PC 2017/05/01
City of Anaheim
Planning Commission
Agenda
Monday, May 1, 2017
Council Chamber, City Hall
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California
Chairperson: Mitchell Caldwell
Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Paul Bostwick
Commissioners: Jess Carbajal, Bill Dalati, Grant Henninger,
Michelle Lieberman, John Seymour
Call To Order - 5:00 p.m.
Pledge Of Allegiance
Public Comments
Public Hearing Items
Commission Updates
Discussion
Adjournment
For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the
agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary.
A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building
Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff
report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on
Thursday, April 27, 2017, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a
majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than
writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection
in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard,
Anaheim, California, during regular business hours.
You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following
e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net
05-01-2017
Page 2 of 5
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications,
Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations,
Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission
action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written
form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City
Clerk.
The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for
public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by
the City Clerk of said hearing.
If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council
at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M.
Public Comments
This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the
exception of public hearing items.
05-01-2017
Page 3 of 5
Public Hearing Items
ITEM NO. 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05888
(DEV2016-00075)
Location: 1431 East La Palma Avenue
Request: To permit a bed and breakfast inn with indoor
entertainment and dining for guests, including the on-site
consumption of alcoholic beverages, within an existing
historic home.
Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission
will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 31
(Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation)
Categorical Exemption.
This item was continued from the April 17, 2017 Planning
Commission meeting.
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Amy Vazquez
avazquez@anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05654D
(DEV2013-00005D)
Location: 5522 East La Palma Avenue
Request: To amend a conditional use permit to allow a
new wall-mounted electronic readerboard sign for an
existing performance art theater located within a multi-
tenant commercial and industrial complex (Chance
Theater).
Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission
will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 11
(Accessory Structures) Categorical Exemption.
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Lindsay Ortega
lortega@anaheim.net
05-01-2017
Page 4 of 5
ITEM NO. 4
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05908
(DEV2017-00021)
Location: 2211 East Orangewood Avenue
Request: To permit a coordinated sign program to allow
signs larger than permitted by the Zoning Code in
association with The George apartment community
currently under construction.
Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission
will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 11
(Accessory Structures) Categorical Exemption.
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Scott Koehm
skoehm@anaheim.net
Adjourn to Monday, May 15, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.
05-01-2017
Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at:
2:00 p.m. April 27, 2017
(TIME) (DATE)
LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK
SIGNED:
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all
members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national
origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative
formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in
implementation thereof.
Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary
aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification,
accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in
person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139,
no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting.
La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos
los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen
nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal.
Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos
apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de
Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y
reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo.
Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios
auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha
modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad
ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714)
765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 1, 2017
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05888
LOCATION: 1431 East La Palma Avenue
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Wayne
Coffey with Taharoa Tourism. The agent representing the applicant is Rachel
Holborn with RE/MAX North Orange County.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to
permit a bed and breakfast inn with indoor dining, on-site consumption of alcoholic
beverages and entertainment for guests within an existing historic home.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under
the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 31, Historical Resource
Restoration/Rehabilitation), and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05888.
BACKGROUND: This 1-acre property is developed with a 3,860 square foot
historic home that was constructed in 1926. The property is located in the “RS-2”
Single-Family Residential zone and the General Plan designates this property for
Low-Density Residential land uses. The property is surrounded by single-family
residences to the north, east and west and a church to the south across La Palma
Avenue.
This hearing was continued from the April 17, 2017 Planning Commission meeting
in order for the item to be re-noticed. Two letters of opposition were submitted in
response to the original project proposal that included a request to allow outdoor
entertainment and a parking variance. A neighboring resident also attended the
hearing and expressed concerns related to the same project elements. In response to
the neighbors’ input, the applicant has revised the request by deleting the outdoor
events. Since the request for outdoor events was deleted, the parking provided now
exceeds the Code required number of spaces and a parking variance is no longer
needed.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05888
May 1, 2017
Page 2 of 5
PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to convert a historic home into a bed and breakfast inn
with indoor dining, on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages and entertainment for guests.
The interior of the 3,860 square foot home would be remodeled to accommodate a commercial
kitchen, accessible restroom, new dining area, and restrooms for each of the four guest rooms on
the second floor. The first floor would also include a game room, lobby, dining room, entry
room, and porch. An automated fire sprinkler system would also be installed as required by the
Fire Department. The exterior of the home would be upgraded with new materials that match the
existing historical features. The carport located in the western portion of the rear yard would be
remodeled to accommodate the manager’s office and living quarters. Entertainment would be
provided for guests in the indoor dining room on Friday and Saturday from 7:00 p.m. to 10 p.m.
The Zoning Code requires 13 parking spaces based on the number of bedrooms, employees and
visitors and 31 Code-compliant parking spaces would be provided as illustrated below.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05888
May 1, 2017
Page 3 of 5
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional
use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the
following conditions exist:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by this code;
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow
the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to
either the particular area or health and safety;
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed,
if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the
City of Anaheim.
Bed and breakfast inns with on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages require approval of a
conditional use permit in this zone to determine compatibility with surrounding land uses. In
order to apply for a conditional use permit for a bed and breakfast the following must apply:
The bed and breakfast inn shall be located in a building of residential design
having a minimum livable floor area of 2,000 square feet, excluding any garage
area.
The historic home is 3,860 square feet.
An owner, manager, proprietor or caretaker of the property shall reside on the
subject premises at all times.
The manager will reside on-site in the proposed accessory dwelling unit
located on the property.
The bed and breakfast inn shall be located on an arterial highway.
La Palma Avenue is designated as a Primary Arterial in the Circulation
Element of the General Plan.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05888
May 1, 2017
Page 4 of 5
The bed and breakfast inn shall be located in a single-family residence deemed
by the City to be of architectural and/or historical significance, and that complies
with all provisions of the California Building Standards Code as adopted by the
City.
On May 18, 2010, the City Council adopted the Citywide Historic Preservation
Plan. The plan includes a list of “Historically Significant Structures.”
Historically Significant Structures are those which have been determined to be
a characteristic part of the historic built environment, but not located within
one of Anaheim’s four designated historic districts. To qualify as a
Historically Significant Structure, a historic survey of the property must be
completed to determine if the structure is at least fifty years old. In addition,
the structure must meet be associated with a local, regional or national history,
a significant person, a particular style of architecture, or be a significant visual
feature of the City. The condition of the property, as seen from the street, must
also appropriately reflect the integrity of the era of the property’s historical
significance as outlined in the U.S. Secretary of Interior’s Standards for
Rehabilitation. Staff completed a historic survey and a physical inspection of
the property and the City Council determined that the property met the
requirements outlined above and designated the home as a “Historically
Significant Structure” on October 18, 2016.
The applicant is requesting approval of on-premises sales and consumption of alcoholic
beverages. A Type 80 (Bed and Breakfast Inn - General) license would be required from the
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). The license would authorize the
sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits to registered guests of the establishment for consumption
on the premises.
Staff does not anticipate that the addition of alcoholic beverage sales at this location would
contribute to an increase in crime if the bed and breakfast inn is operated in a responsible
manner and in compliance with the recommended conditions of approval. These conditions
include typical Police Department conditions for similar uses, such as requiring ABC LEAD
(Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training for employees and limiting the
consumption of alcoholic beverages to registered guests.
The applicant has reached out to the neighbors by walking the neighborhood and describing the
proposed project. The applicant and staff also contacted the speaker who attended the April
17th Planning Commission meeting and informed her of the modified request. Since the
outdoor events and entertainment are no longer a part of this application, she is supportive of
the request to permit a bed and breakfast inn.
As previously mentioned, staff inspected the existing building and the City Council deemed it
to be historically significant. The proposed bed and breakfast inn would be located on an
arterial highway and a manager would reside on-site at all times. The requirements listed above
also provide a distinction between a bed and breakfast inn and a short term rental (or “STR”),
which is a prohibited use in the City.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05888
May 1, 2017
Page 5 of 5
Staff believes the bed and breakfast inn would be consistent with the character of the
surrounding residential neighborhood if the business is operated in a responsible manner and in
compliance with the recommended conditions of approval. These conditions include the
following: prohibiting outdoor events and entertainment, installing proper lighting in the
parking lot, requiring that the manager or innkeeper to be on the premises at all times, limiting
the hours for indoor entertainment, and restricting any amplified music or sound. Based on
these factors, staff believes that the proposed use would be compatible with the surrounding
area and recommends approval of the conditional use permit.
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the
effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e.,
Class 31 –) which consist of consists of projects limited to maintenance, repair, stabilization,
rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation, or reconstruction of historical resources
in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of
Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitation, Restoring, and
Reconstructing Historic Buildings , and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15331 of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on
the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
CONCLUSION: The applicant has modified the request in response to the concerns of the
neighbors and outdoor events are not being proposed at this time. The proposed bed and
breakfast inn is a compatible use with the surrounding area. The recommended conditions of
approval would ensure that the sale of alcoholic beverages would only be served to guests of
the inn and would not have an adverse impact on the surrounding land uses. Staff recommends
approval of this request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Amy Vazquez Jonathan E. Borrego
Contract Planner Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution
2. Letter of Request
3. Photographs
4. Site Plan
5. Floor Plan
6. Letters of Opposition
7. Historic Survey
RS-2SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE
RM-4APTS6 DU
RM-4DAY CARE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
TRELIGIOUS USE
RM-4TRIPLEX
RM-4APTS9 DU
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RM-4WOODSTOCK TERRACEAPTS44 DU
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RM-4APTS7 DU RM-4APTS8 DU
RM-4 APTS12 DU
C-GRETAIL
RM-4APTS6 DU
RM-4LA CUESTACONDOMINIUM36 DU
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
TEDISON ELEMENTARYSCHOOL
RM-4 ACACIA EMERALD APARTMENTS
TRELIGIOUS USE
R
S
-
2
S
I
N
G
L
E
F
A
M
I
L
Y
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
C-GMEDICAL OFFICE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
TRELIGIOUS USE
E LA PALMA AVE
N A C A C I A S TN L I B
E R T Y L N
N
A
N
N
A
D
R
N W A
N D A
D R
N
H
A
W
T
H
O
R
N
S
T
N B O D E N D R
N
B
U
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
S
T
E W I L H E L M I N A S T
E FOREST LN
E DEL MAR LN
E. LA PALMA AVE
E .L I N C O L N A V E
E. ORANGETHORPE AVE
N
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
E . B R O A D W A Y
N . S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D
N .
A N A H E I M
B L V D
N . S U N K I S T S T
1 4 3 1 Ea st La Palma Ave nue
D E V N o. 2016-00075
Subject Property APN: 073-333-37
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16
E LA PALMA AVE
N A C A C I A S T
N L I B
E R T Y L N
N
A
N
N
A
D
R
N W A
N D A
D R
N
H
A
W
T
H
O
R
N
S
T
N B O D E N D R
N
B
U
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
S
T
E W I L H E L M I N A S T
E FOREST LN
E DEL MAR LN
E. LA PALMA AVE
E .L I N C O L N A V E
E. ORANGETHORPE AVE
N
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
E . B R O A D W A Y
N . S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D
N .
A N A H E I M
B L V D
N . S U N K I S T S T
1 4 3 1 Ea st La Palma Ave nue
D E V N o. 2016-00075
Subject Property APN: 073-333-37
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2017-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2017-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05888 AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2016-00075)
(1431 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05888 to permit a
bed and breakfast inn with indoor dining, on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages and
entertainment for guests within an existing historic home (the “Proposed Project”) for certain
real property located at 1431 East La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the approximately 1-acre Property is developed with a 3,860 square foot
historic home. The Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Low-Density Residential
land uses. The Property is located within the “RS-2” Single-Family Residential Zone. As such,
the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.04
(Single-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did provide notice of the April 17, 2017 public
hearing as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures)
of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith. The Planning
Commission continued this item to the May 1, 2017 meeting in order re-notice the item due to a
modification to the Proposed Project, and did hold a public hearing at said meeting at 5:00 p.m.
in the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the
preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the
Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 31 –
Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) which consists of projects limited to
maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation, or
reconstruction of historical resources in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s
Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving,
Rehabilitation, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings , and that, therefore, pursuant to
Section 15331 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not
- 2 - PC2017-***
cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05888, does find and
determine the following facts:
1. The proposed request to permit a bed and breakfast inn with indoor dining, on-site
consumption of alcoholic beverages and entertainment for guests within an existing historic
home is an allowable use within the "RS-2" Single-Family Residential Zone under subsection
.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.04 (Single-Family Residential Zones) of the Code, subject to a
conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "RS-2" Single-Family
Residential Zone.
2. The Proposed Project, under the conditions imposed, are compatible with the
existing uses in the surrounding area because the existing historic structure would be retained
and remodeled, the bed and breakfast inn is located on an arterial highway, and no outdoor
entertainment is proposed on the premises.
3. The size and shape of the site for the Proposed Project, under the conditions
imposed, is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because the project will adhere to all
required development standards in the “RS-2” Single Family Residential zone.
4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because
access to the property would be provided from and arterial highway only and La Palma Avenue
is designed to accommodate any traffic increase generated by the bed and breakfast inn.
5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05888, under the conditions
imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as
the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval
for the use and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05888 and (ii) the conditions of approval set forth in
Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to
be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No.
2016-05888 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City
- 3 - PC2017-***
of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in
accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of
approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i)
equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii)
the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant
progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of
this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of May 1, 2017. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter
18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 4 - PC2017-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 1, 2017, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1st day of May, 2017.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2017-***
- 6 - PC2017-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05888
(DEV2016-00075)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
1 Sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption shall be made
to bed and breakfast inn guests only. Police Department
2 Managers/Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on
Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training for themselves and
register employees. The contact number is 714-558-4101.
Police Department
3 The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with lighting
of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible
the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the
parking lot. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall
not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring
businesses.
Police Department
4 The bed and breakfast inn shall be operated in accordance with the
Statement of Operations submitted as part of this application. Any
changes to the business operation as described in that document shall
be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to
determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Request and to
ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
5 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area over
which they have control in an orderly fashion through the provision
of regular maintenance of the property, including landscaping and
irrigation, and the removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or
marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control
of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of
being applied.
Planning and Building
Department,
Code Enforcement
Division
6 No outdoor banquets, events or entertainment shall be permitted on
the premises.
Planning and Building
Department,
Code Enforcement
Division
7 Indoor entertainment shall occur no later than 10:00 p.m. on Fridays
and Saturdays.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
- 7 - PC2017-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
8 There shall be no amplified music or sound for the indoor
entertainment.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
9 A manager or innkeeper shall be present at all times during operation
of the bed and breakfast inn.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
10 The gates adjacent to La Palma Avenue shall remain open during
regular operating hours and for late night guest arrivals and
departures to avoid any vehicular back-up on La Palma Avenue.
Public Works
Department,
Traffic Engineering
Division
11 All driveways located on the project site shall maintain a minimum
width of 12 feet.
Public Works
Department,
Traffic Engineering
Division
12 An accessible parking space with sufficient path of travel shall be
installed and maintained on the property in compliance with the
California Building Code.
Public Works
Department,
Traffic Engineering
Division
13 All maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration,
preservation, conservation and reconstruction of the historically
significant home shall comply in a manner consistent with the
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties and Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitation, Restoring
and Reconstructing Historic Buildings.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
GENERAL CONDITIONS
14 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the
issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building
permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all
charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or
may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
15 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred
to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
- 8 - PC2017-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees
concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or
determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to
determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition
attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to
include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded
against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or
litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs,
liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with
such proceeding.
Division
16 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department
and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
cgm+foster
A N Z I A R E G I S T E R E D A R C H I T E C T S
CGM + Foster Architects Ltd | ph +64 4 3856751 | PO BOX 16019 Wellington | www.cgmf.co.nz | ARCHITECTURE + URBAN DESIGN
1
Project Description – Development Application
11th October 2016
Project: La Palma House
Location: 1431 E. La Palma Ave, Anaheim, CA
Project Description:
This project proposes converting a residential house into a boutique bed and breakfast. Building
works are mostly interior. Works include:
Extending the Ground Floor kitchen to where there is currently a covered porch, creating a
commercial Kitchen.
Extending porch area
Adding an Accessible Bathroom to GF to service new dining area
Replacing x2 doors on Ground Floor
Adding ensuites to the Level 1 bedrooms.
Onsite parking
New materials will match existing (weatherboard cladding, new timber door joinery, etc). Overall the
boutique accommodation will result in a general ‘upgrade’ of the external appearance of the building,
without affecting any existing historical features.
Days of Operations and Staff:
It is anticipated the following staff with involved in the day to day running of the B&B:
o 1 x Manager,
o 5 x Dining Staff
o 2 x Back of House Staff
It is anticipated the dining area will provide a full alcoholic beverage service and an alcohol
licence will be applied for.
The facility would be staffed 24 hours on site.
No speakers will be used externally on the facility
Low key dinner entertainment would take place indoors with up to 5 performers, it will take
place between 7-10 pm on Fridays or Saturdays for Bed and Breakfast guests.
Bed & Breakfast Facilities:
The minimum liveable floor are is over 200sqFt.
A Manager will be on site at all times.
Signage will be a maximum of 50sqFt, it will not be illuminated, and it will complement the
style and historic nature of the dwelling.
No cooking facilities will be permitted in any guest rooms.
We are looking to extend the operation to include a full dining area on the ground floor,
servicing in house guests only.
The B&B is located on an arterial route.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
cgm+foster
A N Z I A R E G I S T E R E D A R C H I T E C T S
CGM + Foster Architects Ltd | ph +64 4 3856751 | PO BOX 16019 Wellington | www.cgmf.co.nz | ARCHITECTURE + URBAN DESIGN
2
Square Footage:
The SF is largely unchanged. The kitchen extension is into an existing porch area, so technically is
within the building platform. Refer to site plans A2000 and A2010 for further SF analysis.
Traffic:
Gates shall remain open during operating hours to negate any on-street congestion.
Fire:
We will install an automated fire sprinkler system.
If you have a query relating to this please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
emma macann
architect : cgm+foster : 04 385 6751
SIDEWALKLA PALMA AVE
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
2
9
3
'
-
1
1
"
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
2
3
6
.
3
4
'
PROPERTY LINE 157.04'
PROPERTY LINE 132.04'
(
E
)
G
A
R
A
G
E
(
2
c
a
r
)
(
E
)
C
A
R
P
O
R
T
(
E
)
C
A
R
P
O
R
T
(E) LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
(
E
)
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
(
E
)
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
(E) DRIVEWAY(E) DRIVEWAY (E) LANDSCAPE
(
E
)
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
(
E
)
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
PL 23'-0"
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
5
0
'
-
0
"
75'14'-4"41'
(
E
)
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
(
E
)
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
(E) ADJACENT RESIDENCE
42'-10
1
2"
58'
1
2
8
'
-
1
1
3
4
"
1
0
9
'
-
4
1
2
"
10'
N
E
W
C
A
R
P
A
R
K
N
G
1
1
1
0
0
9
0
8
0
7
0
5
0
6
8'-6"18'Maintain and trim trees at boundary e
d
g
e
f
o
r
v
i
s
u
a
l
privacy
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
12'-412"14'-4"
H
O
U
S
E
24'-6"18'
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
21
2
2
2
3
2
4
22'
8'-6"
B&B SIGNAGE
12'
1
9
2
0
2
5
2
6
2
7
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
C
A
R
P
A
R
K
L
O
A
D
I
N
G
Z
O
N
E
D
I
N
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
L
I
V
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
D
I
N
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
K
I
T
C
H
E
N
P
O
R
C
H
B
A
T
H
G
A
M
E
R
O
O
M
20'
9
'
1
6
'
-
8
3
4
"
20'20'
20'20'
10'-8"8'-6"
1
:
1
2
1
:
1
2
1
0
'
1
2
'
1
0
'
27'-9"Gates to remain open during businesshours - Gates to be manually operatedoutside of business hours
c
g
m
+
f
o
s
t
e
r
A
N
Z
I
A
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
5
3
2
4
C
G
M
+
F
o
s
t
e
r
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
L
t
d
|
p
h
+
6
4
4
3
8
5
6
7
5
1
|
P
O
B
O
X
1
6
0
1
9
W
e
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
n
|
w
w
w
.
c
g
m
f
.
c
o
.
n
z
|
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
E
+
U
R
B
A
N
D
E
S
I
G
N
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
C
L
I
E
N
T
D
W
G
D
A
T
E
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
#
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
:
S
C
A
L
E
@
A
r
c
h
C
D
R
A
W
N
:
C
H
K
D
:
D
W
G
:
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
I
S
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
L
E
F
O
R
T
H
E
S
E
T
T
I
N
G
O
U
T
O
F
T
H
E
W
O
R
K
S
,
T
H
E
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
G
O
F
A
L
L
D
I
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
S
A
N
D
L
E
V
E
L
S
O
N
S
I
T
E
,
A
N
D
T
H
E
R
E
P
O
R
T
I
N
G
O
F
A
N
Y
D
I
S
C
R
E
P
A
N
C
I
E
S
T
O
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
I
O
R
T
O
C
O
M
M
E
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
O
F
W
O
R
K
.
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
N
Z
B
C
&
N
Z
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
T
H
I
S
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
A
N
D
D
E
S
I
G
N
R
E
M
A
I
N
S
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
F
C
G
M
+
F
o
s
t
e
r
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
L
t
d
.
D
O
N
O
T
S
C
A
L
E
F
R
O
M
T
H
I
S
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
2
6
.
0
4
.
2
0
1
7
G
:
\
C
G
M
+
F
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
\
2
0
1
6
\
1
6
3
1
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
H
o
u
s
e
L
A
\
3
0
0
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
\
3
5
0
D
D
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
V
4
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
H
o
u
s
e
1
4
3
1
E
.
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
A
v
e
,
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
C
A
T
a
h
a
r
o
a
T
o
u
r
i
s
m
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
S
i
t
e
P
l
a
n
1
/
1
6
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
e
m
a
f
1
6
3
1
A
2
0
1
0
R
3
2
6
.
0
4
.
1
7
SCALE =Proposed Site Plan1/16" = 1'-0"011,602 SF2ND FLOOR:3,860SF HABITABLE FLOOR AREA:2,258 SF PROPOSED - MAIN BUILDING:FIRST FLOOR:NO. OF STORY: 2 STORIESNO. OF BEDROOM: 4 BEDROOMSNO. OF BATHROOM: 5 BATHROOM PARKING TABULATION:0.8 x bedroom numbers = 4 carparks0.25 x employee numbers = 1 carparksTotal req. 13 carparksTotal carparks available = 22 8 spaces per 1,000 SF of Cafe GFA = 8 c
a
r
p
a
r
k
s
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
4
FI
E
L
D
V
E
R
I
F
Y
(E) KITCHEN
UP
(E) FAMILY ROOM (E) BEDROOM #1
(E) BATH
(E) ENTRY
(E) STORE
(E) LAUNDRY
(E) LIVING ROOM(E) GAME ROOM
(E)
DINING
ROOM
12'-1"36'-1"
(E)48'-2"
FIELD VERIFY
(E
)
5
6
'
-
2
"
FI
E
L
D
V
E
R
I
F
Y
(E
)
4
4
'
-
2
"
FI
E
L
D
V
E
R
I
F
Y
(E)48'-2"
FIELD VERIFY
29'-8"13'-3"5'-3"
(E) PORCH
12'-1"36'-1"
KITCHEN
UP
ACCESSIBLE
ENTRY (AS IS)
12'-1"43'-6"
(E)55'-7"
FIELD VERIFY
(E
)
5
6
'
-
2
"
FI
E
L
D
V
E
R
I
F
Y
(E
)
4
4
'
-
2
"
FI
E
L
D
V
E
R
I
F
Y
(E)48'-2"
FIELD VERIFY
29'-8"13'-3"5'-3"
LOBBY
SS
W
o
r
k
b
e
n
c
h
Oven
7'-5
1
4"
F
r
e
e
z
e
r
(E)
DINING
ROOM
Dining Area
(E) LIVING ROOM(E) GAME ROOM
(E) PORCH
PORCH
15
'
-
4
"
12
'
-
8
"
5'
5'
7'-5
1
4"
03
4000A
01
4010A
01
4000A
03
4010A
04
4000A
02
4010A
02
4000A
04
4010A
03
4000A
04
4000A
NEW PORCH
27'-6"
13
'
-
1
1 2"
Overbench
commercial
dishwahser
Fo
o
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Ov
e
r
h
e
a
d
B
e
a
m
Zo
n
e
4'
-
8
"
BATH
(E) BATH
3'
-
1
0
"
9'
-
6
"
2 Tub S/S prep
sink
1 Tub scullery with
greasetrap under
Mop sink
Handwash sink
Store
(E)
PORCH
Ov
e
r
h
e
a
d
B
e
a
m
Extraction hood
over
SS prep bench
with fridge under
Hobs
Deep
Fryer
Store
Fridge
13
'
-
6
1 2"
1:12
1:12
Accessible Ramp
cgm+foster A N Z I A R E G I S T E R E D A R C H I T E C T S 5324
CGM + Foster Architects Ltd | ph +64 4 3856751 | PO BOX 16019 Wellington | www.cgmf.co.nz | ARCHITECTURE + URBAN DESIGN
PROJECT
CLIENT
DWG
DATE REVISION
PROJECT #
REVISION
DATE:
SCALE @ Arch C
DRAWN:
CHKD:
DWG:
ADDRESS
THE BUILDER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SETTING
OUT OF THE WORKS, THE CHECKING OF ALL
DIMENSIONS AND LEVELS ON SITE, AND THE
REPORTING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE
ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK.
WORKS TO COMPLY WITH NZBC & NZ STANDARDS
COPYRIGHT OF THIS DRAWING AND DESIGN REMAINS
THE PROPERTY OF CGM + Foster Architects Ltd.
DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING
07.04.2017
G:\CGM + F PROJECT\2016\1631 La Palma House LA\300 Design Documentation\350 DD Developed Design\La Palma Developed Design- Standard V4
La Palma House
1431 E. La Palma Ave, Anaheim CA
Taharoa Tourism
Floor Plans
1/8" = 1'-0"
em
af
1631
A3000
R2
07.04.17
SCALE =
Ground Floor - Demolition
1/8" = 1'-0"01 SCALE =
Ground Floor - Proposed
1/8" = 1'-0"02
Conditional Use Permit
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
DN
(E) BEDROOM #
2
(
E
)
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
#
3
(
E
)
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
#
4
(
E
)
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
#
5
(E) BEDROOM
#
6
(
E
)
B
A
T
H
(
E
)
B
A
T
H
(
E
)
B
A
T
H
(E) DECK44'-2"12'-1"
3
6
'
-
1
"
44'-2"
4
8
'
-
2
"
DN
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
#
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
#
2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
#
3
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
#
4
44'-2"
1
2
'
-
1
"
3
6
'
-
1
"
44'-2"
4
8
'
-
2
"
E
N
S
U
I
T
E
S
T
O
R
E
E
N
S
U
I
T
E
E
N
S
U
I
T
E
E
N
S
U
I
T
E
(
E
)
D
E
C
K
8'-1
1
4"7'-11"11'-6"14'-5"
1
3
'
-
2
"
7
'
-
7
"
1
3
'
-
6
"
0
3
4
0
0
0
A
0
1
4
0
1
0
A
0
1
4
0
0
0
A
034010A
0
4
4
0
0
0
A
0
2
4
0
1
0
A
0
2
4
0
0
0
A
0
4
4
0
1
0
A
SCALE =Level 1 - Demolition1/8" = 1'-0"01
c
g
m
+
f
o
s
t
e
r
A
N
Z
I
A
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
5
3
2
4
C
G
M
+
F
o
s
t
e
r
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
L
t
d
|
p
h
+
6
4
4
3
8
5
6
7
5
1
|
P
O
B
O
X
1
6
0
1
9
W
e
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
n
|
w
w
w
.
c
g
m
f
.
c
o
.
n
z
|
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
E
+
U
R
B
A
N
D
E
S
I
G
N
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
C
L
I
E
N
T
D
W
G
D
A
T
E
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
#
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
:
S
C
A
L
E
@
A
r
c
h
C
D
R
A
W
N
:
C
H
K
D
:
D
W
G
:
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
I
S
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
L
E
F
O
R
T
H
E
S
E
T
T
I
N
G
O
U
T
O
F
T
H
E
W
O
R
K
S
,
T
H
E
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
G
O
F
A
L
L
D
I
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
S
A
N
D
L
E
V
E
L
S
O
N
S
I
T
E
,
A
N
D
T
H
E
R
E
P
O
R
T
I
N
G
O
F
A
N
Y
D
I
S
C
R
E
P
A
N
C
I
E
S
T
O
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
I
O
R
T
O
C
O
M
M
E
N
C
E
M
E
N
T
O
F
W
O
R
K
.
W
O
R
K
S
T
O
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
N
Z
B
C
&
N
Z
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
T
H
I
S
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
A
N
D
D
E
S
I
G
N
R
E
M
A
I
N
S
T
H
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
O
F
C
G
M
+
F
o
s
t
e
r
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
L
t
d
.
D
O
N
O
T
S
C
A
L
E
F
R
O
M
T
H
I
S
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
2
7
.
0
1
.
2
0
1
7
\
\
1
9
2
.
1
6
8
.
1
.
6
6
\
c
g
m
f
d
a
t
a
\
C
G
M
+
F
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
\
2
0
1
6
\
1
6
3
1
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
H
o
u
s
e
L
A
\
3
0
0
D
e
s
i
g
n
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
\
3
5
0
D
D
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
-
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
V
3
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
H
o
u
s
e
1
4
3
1
E
.
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
A
v
e
,
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
C
A
T
a
h
a
r
o
a
T
o
u
r
i
s
m
F
l
o
o
r
P
l
a
n
s
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
e
m
a
f
1
6
3
1
A
3
0
1
0
R
S
C
A
L
E
=
L
e
v
e
l
1
-
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
0
2
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
From:shopper12-misc@yahoo.com
To:Amy K. Vazquez
Subject:Proposed B&B 1431 E La Palma Ave
Date:Wednesday, April 05, 2017 11:42:06 AM
Ms Vazquez,
I am against the proposed project of a Bed and Breakfast at 1431 E La Palma Ave because of the
outdoor events and entertainment.
We are a very close knit residential area and my house is already filled with (foreign) music every
week. A bed and breakfast does not have a need to provide alcohol and entertainment; the parking is
not adequate and the requirements should not have been waived; I have already experienced hearing
disruptive live music from that address. The parking is awful in our neighborhood due to the fact that
housing is so expensive. The only way to afford a house is by people putting multiple families in a home
or renting out every room in their house. This triples if not quadruples the number of cars per home.
With that comes the noise pollution of disruptive behavior, consistently honking car horns and littering.
Cars are parked too close to intersections; horns are honking every time someone gets in/out of their
car plus car alarms going off; I've even witnessed people opening their car doors and shoveling their
fast food trash onto the street (more than once). Heck, my neighbors can't even quiet down a barking
dog within 20 minutes or grocery shop without bringing home a shopping cart.
The proposed project would only add to the already steady demise of our area. Housing, Code
Enforcement, and the Police do nothing without a heads up. Filling out the paperwork and waiting two
weeks for a response is a terrible process, and we could all be calling the police weekly over things that
should be common sense and common courtesy - so we don't. This disrespect for city code and the
lack of enforcement makes the proposed B&B fuel for the flame. In fact, it doesn't sound like a bed
and breakfast at all. If they want to house the number of people their parking allows, feed them
breakfast, and provide shuttles to city attractions then that's fine. But if you want to drink, entertain,
and house more people/cars then you have room for then, of course, don't bend the rules for this
disaster waiting to happen.
Sadly, this is not the neighborhood or city I grew up in anymore and I don't see it recovering. Adding a
B&B with alcohol and entertainment when the location is surrounded by people's homes is beyond
thoughtless. I hope the Planning Commission will detail this very carefully and not provide the police
with just another place that causes them grief. Seriously, why go through the expense and trouble if
ultimately our complaints may shut it down.
Pam
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
From:ESME VILLEGAS
To:Amy K. Vazquez
Subject:Question regarding a city project in my neighborhood
Date:Monday, April 10, 2017 10:31:55 AM
Good morning Amy,
My name is Esmeralda and my parents own the house behind the property 1431 East La Palma Ave.
They are concern about the project building in that property. Their main concern is the fence that
divides my parents house and the project property the fence is to small and anyone could jump over
at any time. The other concern is the big tree in the property. My mom has called the city before
and they said the owner of the house is in charge of cutting it. We did speak to the previous owner
and his response was if it falls in your house I have liability. The tree branches reach over my parents
house. My parents have lived in the property for over 25 years and they are just concern.
Thank you,
Esmeralda Villegas
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
State of California The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Christine Nguyen, Planning Dept. Date Sept. 2016
Page 1 of 5 *Resource Name or #: The DeSombre House
P1. Other Identifier: 1431 East La Palma Avenue
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County: Orange
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.)
*b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Date: T ; R ; ¼ of ¼ of Sec ; M.D. B.M.
c. Address: 1431 East La Palma Avenue City: Anaheim Zip: 92805
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
e. Other Locational Data: Parcel 1: The South one (1) acre of the West two (2) acres of Lot 24 of Golden State Tract No. 2; Parcel 2: That
portion of Lot 24 of Golden State Tract No. 2 beginning at a point on the centerline of North Street (now La Palma Ave.) distance Westerly 529.32
feet from the intersection of the centerline of Acacia Street and North Street (now La Palma Ave.) as said intersection existed on October 19,
1959; thence North 0 degrees 48 minutes 10 seconts West 246.63 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said Lot 24 a distance of 25 feet
to said centerline of North Street (now La Palma Ave.); thence South parallel with Acacia Street 246.63 feet to the centerline of North Street (now
La Palma Ave.); thence West along said centerline of North Street (now La Palma Ave.) 25 feet to the point of beginning. / APN #073-333-37
*P3a. Description:
This two-story, Neoclassical Revival style single family residence is framed in wood and clad in wide clapboard siding. The side
gabled roof is clad in composition shingle and features eave returns and closed eaves articulated with paired brackets. A brick
chimney rises near the center on the west façade. Fenestration consists of double-hung, mostly nine-over-one wood sash, double-
hung windows flanked in some places by nonoriginal plastic shutters. The top of each side façade, below the apex of the gable,
features a semicircular louvered attic vent that also serves a decorative purpose.
The primary façade is dominated by a central double-height “temple front” consisting of a pedimented front gable carried on Ionic
columns. The temple front overlaps a one-story porch with a classical balustrade on the roof spanning the width of the façade,
which is also carried on shorter Ionic columns at the corners and flanking the front steps. The porch is approached by a broad
flight of steps, now covered in nonoriginal tile. A sunroom glazed with multilight paired casement windows lies at the east end of
the porch on the southeast corner of the house The front door and sidelights are surmounted by a shallow segmental-arched fan
light. A lattice screen at the west end of the porch may be an early feature. [See Page 3, continuation sheet]
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 Single Family Residence
*P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5b. Description of Photo: (View,
date, accession #)
Front façade, view looking north
August 2016
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: Historic
Prehistoric Both
1926(f) Orange County Property
Tax Assessment Record
*P7. Owner and Address: (and
phone number)
Kirk W. & Martha A. Wheeler,
Trustees
1431 E. La Palma Ave.
Anaheim, CA 92805
*P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,
and address)
Jane K. Newell, Heritage Svs. Mgr
City of Anaheim
Jennifer Trotoux, ARG
*P9. Date Recorded: August 2016
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive survey (Anaheim survey for listing as a Historically Significant Structure)
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") none
*Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record
Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record
Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (List):
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
State of California The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 2 of 5 *NRHP Status Code
*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) The DeSombre House
B1. Historic Name: The DeSombre House
B2. Common Name: 1431 East La Palma Avenue
B3. Original Use: Single Family Residence B4. Present Use: Single Family Residence
*B5. Architectural Style: Neoclassical Revival
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Constructed in 1926, per Orange County
Property Tax Assessment Records; Building permits issued: Reroof (1959); Sewer connection (1978); Reroof (1983); Rewire and
upgrade electrical system (1997); Replace electrical panel (2001); Reroof (2003).
*B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Outbuildings at the rear include large sheds at the northwest corner, a small house (c. 1920 with
extensive additions and alterations) behind the main residence; and a detached two-car garage (1926 with additions) to the east.
B9a. Architect: unknown b. Builder: unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Architecture; Agricultural Development Area: Anaheim
Period of Significance: 1926 Property Type: Single Family Residence Applicable Criteria: 1, 3
This single family residence was originally associated with an Anaheim family citrus farm, but the house itself is by no means
typical of such properties. The property reveals historical information about the patterns of Anaheim’s agricultural plots outside of
the city limits in the early 20th century since it was built as the centerpiece of a citrus ranch. More importantly, the house is one of
the largest and most intact historic residences of 1920s Anaheim, and perhaps the leading example extant in the city today; it may
also be among the best examples of its type and style throughout Orange County. It is eligible for designation as a Historically
Significant Structure under Criterion 1 for its association with Anaheim’s agricultural period (1890-1955) and under Criterion 3 as a
significant example of Neoclassical style architecture, a rarity in Anaheim at this scale. Most Anaheim houses exhibiting this level
of architectural pretension were constructed prior to the turn of the 20th century, and all but a small number of these have been
lost to later development.
The family-owned groves and farms of Anaheim were typically five acres in size with a small residence located close to the road
frontage and the groves or fields stretching behind the house. When the orchards were removed in the post-agricultural period
(generally after the 1950s), the lands were typically subdivided for
residential development and the original grove house became a part
of the fabric of a newer neighborhood. In this case, the property
contains an unusually grand house that remains on a parcel of
substantial size (one acre), appropriate to the scale of the house.
The agricultural acreage, now lost, was ten acres, or twice what was
typical in Anaheim.
The property retains its historic integrity in terms of location, setting,
design, materials, and workmanship. The historic feeling and
association are also intact due to the lack of alterations to the
residence and the generous parcel on which it remains.
Located northeast of the original Anaheim Colony, Golden State
Tract No. 2 consisted of 240 acres of unimproved land purchased
over several years by Jacob Stern, then subdivided in 1906 into
twenty-four ten-acre lots marketed as potential citrus ranches. Jacob
Stern (b. 1859) emigrated from Germany in 1884 and established the
Stern & Goodman general store in Fullerton in 1889 with his cousin,
Joseph Goodman. They opened their second store in Anaheim in
1892, and operated five stores in Orange County by 1900. By 1904
Jacob Stern moved to Los Angeles and entered the real estate
business. [Per “Jacob Stern,” Los Angeles from the Mountains to the
Sea, 1921]
(See Page 3, continuation sheet)
B12. References: The DeSombre House: Orange Blossoms Into
Art by Lawrence Macaray (Anaheim, 1994); Anaheim & Orange
County directories; Orange County Tax Assessment Records;
Orange County Grantor/Grantee Index; Grant Deeds; Articles &
obituaries published in local newspapers; Aerial photographs; U.S.
Census records, California Voter Registration, California Death
Index, Family Trees, etc. from Ancestry.com.
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Nguyen, Planning Dept.
*Date of Evaluation: September 2016
State of California The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Page 3 of 5 *Resource Name or # The De Sombre House
Recorded by: Jane K. Newell & Jennifer Trotroux Continuation Update
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
P3a Description (Continued from Page 1)
The level of decoration and refinement of materials seen in the interior is somewhat above that of the average 1920s house in
Anaheim, but it still reflects the house’s status and use as a farmhouse, albeit larger and grander than usual. The layout is
centered about an entrance hall with an original L-shaped staircase with the end of the balustrade spiraling about the newel post.
The flooring of ceramic tile was added on top of the original oak floors, which otherwise are intact throughout the first floor. The
living room lies to the left (west) and the dining room the right (east). Both rooms have coved ceilings. The kitchen is accessed
through a butler’s pantry, off of which also lies a large breakfast room to the east (right) with fenestration matching that of the front
sun room. A back hall separates the stairhall from the laundry room/service porch, and also gives access to a small den situated at
the north end of the living room on the northwest corner of the house. The second floor contains four bedrooms located at the
corners of the plan and a smaller bedroom (with an early linoleum floor covering) on the north side. The upstairs hall has a
generous door on the south side at the front of the house to access to the roof of the porch, which functions as a deck.
The exterior has very high historic integrity, with the only significant change being the addition of plastic shutters. The interior of the
house has seen limited alterations, such as the loss of some plaster walls (replaced with drywall) and the remodeling of the kitchen
and bathrooms. The powder room on the main floor retains original fixtures.
A circular driveway and a number of large date palm trees in the front of the property appear to be historic landscape features.
Two outbuildings date to the period of its construction, but have been altered. They do not maintain enough historic integrity to
convey significant information about the property in terms of its role as a farmhouse or as an example of the Neoclassic style of
architecture.
B10 Significance (Continued from Page 2)
On December 4, 1906 Jacob and Sarah Stern sold Lots 4-14 and Lots 18-24 of the Golden State Tract No. 2 to the Anaheim Land
Syndicate of Los Angeles. The Syndicate sold to William Hackett of Los Angeles the 10-acre Lot 23 on December 10, 1908 and
the “West two acres of lot 24” on March 8, 1910. A week later, on March 15, 1910, William and Louisa Hackett sold the combined
parcel to George J. Shoenhair, also of Los Angeles.
Five months later, on August 22, 1910, George J. and Mabel Shoenhair sold the unimproved property to George H. Croot, of San
Diego. Two years later, on September 17, 1912, George H. and Anna Croot (now living in Iowa Falls, Iowa) granted the property
back to George J. Shoenhair.
On February 2, 1914, W.E. and Nova Lee DeSombre purchased the unimproved 10-acre Lot 23 and the west two acres of Lot 24
from George J. and Mabel Shoenhair. William Ernest DeSombre (b. 1867), a native of Wisconsin, served in the Spanish-
American War in 1898. He attended the University of Chicago, graduating in 1901 with a Bachelor’s degree in Philosophy. Soon
after he re-enlisted in the U.S. Army, served in World War I and retired with the rank of Major in July 1920. [Per William
DeSombre’s obituary, Santa Ana Register, 3/3/1930] In 1908 he met and married Nova Lee Thornton (b. 1873, Texas) and they
had one son, William Ernest Jr. (1912-1926). The family relocated frequently as William DeSombre moved up the ranks. By
1911, the new Captain in the Coast Artillery Corps. was stationed at Fort Hagler in Washington. While there, David W. McDannald
of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce boasted that he persuaded William DeSombre to buy a permanent home in Orange
County (per “Booster Talks Bring Many to Reside,” Santa Ana Register, 11/23/1923). There’s no evidence that the DeSombres
spent any time in Anaheim before William’s retirement from the military in 1920, which was also the first year that taxes were paid
on a $360 improvement to the property, indicating that a small house or bungalow (possibly the “summer house” at the back of the
property) had been completed. Tax records indicate that the DeSombres were instead investing in their 11-acre Valencia orange
grove and outbuildings (assessed values jumped from $1,000 with no improvements in 1918 to $1,955 with $900 improvements in
1920 for the grove). The Orange County Tax Assessment Records indicate that a new dwelling assessed at $2,000 was
constructed on the two-acre parcel in 1926. This house, one of the few residences in Anaheim constructed in the Neoclassical
style, was constructed on North Street (now La Palma Ave.) in the Anaheim Rural Delivery Route No. 3. From 1946 through 1953,
when the area was annexed to the City of Anaheim, the county address was 13351 La Palma Ave. Following his retirement from
the military, William DeSombre quickly adapted to the role of citrus rancher, serving as a director of the Anaheim Co-Operative
Orange Association packing house from 1920 until his death in 1930. He also taught mathematics at Fremont School from 1925-
1930. Following the death of William DeSombre on March 1, 1930, Nova Lee DeSombre became the sole owner of the property.
On October 10, 1934 Nova Lee DeSombre sold ten-acre Lot 23 set with orange trees to George W. Candee. George Woodrow
Candee and his wife, Phyllis, defaulted on the mortgage in 1936 and the orange grove reverted back to Nova Lee.
Nova Lee DeSombre continued to operate the citrus ranch until Frank and Belle Marony and George and Marie Sattler purchased
Lot 23 and the north one acre of the west two acres of Lot 24 on June 24, 1938. This left Nova Lee with the house on the
remaining one-acre parcel. (See Page 4, continuation sheet)
State of California The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Page 4 of 5 *Resource Name or # The De Sombre House
Recorded by: Jane K. Newell & Jennifer Trotroux Continuation Update
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
B10 Significance (Continued from Page 3)
On July 25, 1938 Nova Lee granted the house and the south one acre of the west two acres in Lot 24 to her widowed sister,
Pauline Campbell (b. 1868, Texas), who owned the property next door at 1441 E. La Palma Ave. Nova Lee DeSombre passed
away on October 21, 1938 and was buried with her husband and son in Loma Vista Memorial Park in Fullerton.
On January 30, 1941 Pauline Campbell granted the property to her unmarried sister, Nina Thornton. Nancy “Nina” Thornton (b.
1870, Texas) moved from Texas to Anaheim in 1938, following the death of Nova Lee, to assist Pauline Campbell by occupying
and caring for the DeSombre House. Before her death on April 13, 1947, Pauline Campbell also granted to Nina Thornton the
property at 1441 E. La Palma Ave..
Nina Thornton granted the property to her nephew, R.F. Campbell on July 7, 1947. On December 24, 1947 she also granted him
the westerly twenty-five feet of the property at 1441 E. La Palma Ave. Roy Francis Campbell (b. 1888, Texas) was the only son of
Pauline and John Campbell. He joined his widowed mother in Anaheim in 1933, finding work with C.L. Swope Liquors on West
Center St. In 1937 he married Billie Elizabeth Hill (b. 1903, New Mexico) and the couple moved to 907 N. Helena St. In 1940 Roy
became foreman for Cal-Juices and later plant superintendent for Real Gold Citrus Products. By 1945 the couple had moved into
the DeSombre house to help his mother, Pauline Campbell, and aunt, Nina Thornton, care for both properties. Nina Thornton lived
with her nephew and his wife until 1959, when her ill health forced her into a convalescent hospital, where she died on June 28,
1963. The property at 1431 E. La Palma Ave. had remained in the DeSombre/Campbell/Thornton families for 45 years.
On October 5, 1959 Roy and Billie Campbell sold the property to Leslie I. and Hildred J. Ferrell. Leslie Ivan Ferrell (b. 1904), a
California native, met and married Hildred Jean Williams (b. 1901, South Dakota) in 1927 in Long Beach. The couple opened the
Ferrell Pharmacy in 1928 in Los Angeles, selling it to Mission Cut-Rate Drug Stores in 1932. After managing the Mission
Pharmacy in Long Beach from 1932-1936, the Ferrells joined Hildred’s married sister, Carrie Rogers, in Anaheim. In partnership
with Paul V. McCoy of Santa Ana, they opened a McCoy Drug Co. store at 100 W. Center St., which they operated through 1951.
The Ferrells were very active in community organizations, including the Anaheim Altrusa Club, Goodwill Industries, American Red
Cross, and Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. They also frequently hosted political meetings and fundraisers in the DeSombre
House, with guests including Anaheim Mayor Charles Pearson, Richard Nixon, Thomas Kuchel, Ronald Reagan, Walter Knott, and
John and Pilar Wayne. A veteran of World War II, Leslie Ferrell died on February 4, 1975 and Hildred Ferrell died on January 15,
1984.
Following the death of Hildred Ferrell in 1984, the property was inherited by her sister, Carrie K. Rogers, who owned the property
next door at 1441 E. La Palma Ave.
On April 30, 1985 Carrie Rogers sold the property to Lawrence R. and Kathleen L.Macaray. Lawrence Richard Macaray was born
in 1921 in Orange County and raised in Anaheim, where he graduated from Anaheim Union High School in 1938. In 1943 he
married Kathleen Louise Vincent (b. 1924, South Dakota) in Ainsworth, Nebraska, where Lawrence was serving in the U.S. Army
during World War II. The couple had two children, David and Peggy. [Per Macaray Family Genealogy, Anaheim Heritage Center]
Lawrence Macaray taught drawing and painting at El Camino College for 25 years and in 1994 self-published a book about the
DeSombre House.
The Macarays sold the property on June 22, 1995 to Kirk and Martha Wheeler. Kirk William Wheeler (b. 1952), a California native,
married Martha Anne Kozlowski in Los Angeles on October 20, 1979 (per the California Birth and Marriage Indexes). On
December 21, 2015 the property was placed in the Wheeler Family Revocable Trust.
[See Page 5, continuation sheet]
State of California The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
Page 5 of 5 *Resource Name or # The De Sombre House
Recorded by: Jane K. Newell & Jennifer Trotroux Continuation Update
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
B10 Significance (Continued from Page 4)
1938 Aerial View: 1431 E. La Palma Ave. - original 12-acre parcel (including 11-acre orange grove) outlined in red
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 1, 2017
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05654D
LOCATION: 5522 East La Palma Avenue (Chance Theater)
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Casey Long, representing
Chance Theater and the property owner is Frome Developments Omega, LLC.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to
permit the installation of a wall-mounted electronic readerboard sign for an existing
performance art theater.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically
exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (Class 11, Accessory Structures) and approving Conditional Use Permit
No. 2013-05654D.
BACKGROUND: The 8.8-acre property is developed with a 124,930 square foot
industrial complex and is located in Development Area 1(Industrial Area) of the
"SP 2015-1" Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan zone. The General Plan designates the
property for Industrial land uses. The site was formerly located in the Northeast
Area Specific Plan and in the Scenic Corridor Overlay zone, which previously
prohibited the use of electronic readerboards. When the Anaheim Canyon Specific
Plan was adopted in 2016, the Scenic Corridor Overlay zone was amended to
exclude properties located within the SP2015-1 Specific Plan. Surrounding land
uses include a retail center to the east, industrial uses to the west, an office building
to the north across La Palma Avenue, and the Santa Ana River to the south.
Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654 was approved by the Planning
Commission in 1999 to allow a live performance theater. In 2013, the Commission
approved an amendment to the conditional use permit and a determination of public
convenience or necessity to allow the relocation of the theater to a larger unit on the
same property, including the ability to serve alcoholic beverages to theater patrons.
In 2014, the Commission approved a third amendment to permit the expansion of
the live performance theater and a variance to permit less parking than required by
the Zoning Code.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05654D
May 1, 2017
Page 2 of 3
PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a wall-mounted LED electronic readerboard
sign on the north-facing elevation of the movie theater building. The sign would be set back
approximately 90 feet from La Palma Avenue and would replace an existing unpermitted
marquee readerboard of a similar size. The proposed LED screen would take the place of the
existing marquee sign and is proposed to be 3 feet, 4 inches tall and 7 feet, 6 inches wide. The
LED screen would display images of performances theater show times and events. The sign is
not intended to capture the attention of vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways given its size and
distance from La Palma Avenue. The electronic readerboard sign would operate between the
hours of 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve an amendment to a
conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all
of the following conditions exist:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by this code;
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the
particular area or health and safety;
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the
area; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if
any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
The Zoning Code allows “marquee” or “electronic readerboard” signs for certain types of uses,
including theaters, subject to approval of a conditional use permit. However, the Code only
includes provisions for freestanding electronic readerboard signs, with no provisions for wall-
mounted electronic readerboard signs. If a use is not authorized or mentioned in any zone
throughout the City, and the Director of Planning and Building has determined that the use does
not fit into an existing use class, the use may be authorized by conditional use permit. The
Director of Planning and Building has determined that the proposed wall-mounted electronic
readerboard-type sign qualifies as an unlisted use, which can be allowed by conditional use
permit.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05654D
May 1, 2017
Page 3 of 3
The sign is designed to enhance the performance art experience of theater patrons. The
electronic readerboard sign is designed to display performance art images visible to theater
patrons similar to the existing manual marquee that the readerboard is meant to replace. The
sign would not be readily visible to vehicular traffic on La Palma Avenue or any sensitive land
uses. Staff also believes that the proposed size, scale and location are appropriate for the
theater. The attached draft resolution includes conditions of approval which prohibits general
advertising of goods and services on the sign. An additional condition of approval limits use of
the sign between 9:00 a.m. and midnight.
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the
effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e.,
Class 11 – Accessory Structures) which consist of construction, or replacement of minor
structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional
facilities, including but not limited to on-premises signs, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section
15311 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a
significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions
of CEQA.
CONCLUSION: The proposed wall-mounted electronic readerboard sign for Chance Theater
would enhance the experience of the patrons of the center in a manner that is compatible with
the surrounding businesses in the vicinity. The proposed size and location of the sign would
have limited visibility from La Palma Avenue and would be appropriate for the site. Therefore,
staff recommends approval of this request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Lindsay Ortega Jonathan E. Borrego
Contract Planner Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution
2. Request Letter
3. Plans
4. Photo Simulations/Site Photographs
5. Last Amended CUP Resolution (PC2014-051)
SP 2015-1DA1DEV 2013-00005DINDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA5SERVICE STATION
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5BANK
SP 2015-1DA1ANAHEIMHILLSHEALTHPLAZA SP 2015-1DA1CANYONOFFICECENTER
SP 2015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA6SANTA ANA RIVER
SP 2015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA1CANYONOFFICECENTER
SP 2015-1DA5CINEMACITYTHEATER
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
E LA PALMA AVE
E. LA PALMA AVE
E .S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
E. ORANGETHORPE AVE
E.S A N T A A N A CANYON RD
E .L A P A L M A A V E
5 5 2 2 Ea st La Palma Ave nue
D E V N o. 2013-00005D
Subject Property APN: 346-451-31
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16
E LA PALMA AVE
E. LA PALMA AVE
E .S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
E. ORANGETHORPE AVE
E.S A N T A A N A CANYON RD
E .L A P A L M A A V E
5 5 2 2 Ea st La Palma Ave nue
D E V N o. 2013-00005D
Subject Property APN: 346-451-31
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2017-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2017-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05654 TO PERMIT A WALL-MOUNTED
ELECTRONIC READERBOARD SIGN
AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2013-00005D)
(5522 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, on March 25, 2013, and subject to certain conditions of approval, the
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the "Planning
Commission"), by its Resolution No. PC2013-030, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-
05654 (herein referred to as the "Original CUP") to permit a live performance theater at 5522
East La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, and (2)
determined that the public convenience or necessity will be served by the issuance by the
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC") of a Type 69 (Special On-Sale
Beer and Wine Theater) license (herein referred to as "Public Convenience or Necessity No.
2013-00095" or the "Original PCN"); and
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2013 and subject to certain conditions of approval, the
Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2013-087, approved Conditional Use Permit No.
2013-05654B to amend the Original CUP to change the operation of the theater from a Type 69
(Special On-Sale Beer and Wine Theater) license to a Type 64 (Special On-Sale General Theater)
license; and
WHEREAS, on June 30, 2014 and subject to certain conditions of approval, the
Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2014-051, approved Conditional Use Permit No.
2013-05654C to amend the Original CUP to permit the expansion of a live performance theater in
conjunction with Variance No. 2014-04969 to permit fewer off-street parking spaces than
required by the Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, the Original CUP, Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654B, and
Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654C shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CUP".
The conditions of approval which were the subject of the CUP shall be referred to herein
collectively as the "Previous Conditions of Approval"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning
Commission") did receive a verified petition to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654
(herein referred to as “Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654D”) to permit a wall-mounted
electronic readerboard sign (the "Proposed Project") for an existing performance art theater to be
located on an existing building located at 5522 East La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
- 2 - PC2017-***
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 8.8 acres in size and is currently developed
with as an industrial park with four buildings. The Anaheim General Plan designates the
Property for Industrial land uses. The Property is located within the Anaheim Canyon Specific
Plan (SP 2015-1) area. As such, the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards
described in Chapter 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1) of the Anaheim
Municipal Code (the “Code”); and
WHEREAS, the Proposed Project is a use not expressly authorized or permitted in the
Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan Area and is also not authorized or mentioned in any zone
throughout the City. Pursuant to the authority conferred upon the Planning Director by Section
18.66.040 (Approval Authority) of Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Code and,
specifically, paragraph .0201 of Subsection .020 (Unlisted Uses Permitted), the Planning
Director has found and determined that the Proposed Project does not fit into an existing use
class, as provided in subsection .020 (Inclusion of Specific Uses) of Section 18.36.020
(Classification of Uses), but may be authorized by conditional use permit until such time as the
Code is amended to include such a use; and
WHEREAS, May 1, 2017, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the
Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code
to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-
05654D, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, as the "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act
(Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning
Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those
generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 11 – Accessory Structures) which consists of
the construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing
commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to on-premise signs,
and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15311 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations,
the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654D, does find
and determine the following:
1. The proposed request to permit a wall-mounted "electronic readerboard" sign, as
defined in Subsection .430 of Section 18.44.030 (Definitions) of Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the
Code, in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan (SP 2015-1) area is an unlisted use for which a
conditional use permit is authorized under .0201 of Subsection .020 (Unlisted Uses Permitted) of
Section 18.66.040 of the Code.
2. The proposed request to permit a wall-mounted electronic readerboard sign for an
existing performance art theater would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the Property is
- 3 - PC2017-***
developed as an industrial complex, the sign is setback approximately 90 feet from La Palma
Avenue, and the surrounding properties consist of commercial and industrial land uses.
3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the
proposed electronic readerboard sign in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the
health, safety and general welfare of the public because the Proposed Project will comply with
all development standards in the SP 2015-1 zone.
4. The traffic generated by permitting the wall-mounted "electronic readerboard" sign
would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to
carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the property
would not change and the proposed electronic readerboard sign will not increase traffic in the
vicinity.
5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654D under the conditions
imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
The facility has operated in this location since 1999 and has proven to be a compatible use in the
area. The addition of an electronic readerboard sign in the same location where the existing
manual readerboard is located would be consistent and compatible with surrounding uses.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this
Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654D,
contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference(the "Revised Conditions of Approval").
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, effective upon the effective date of this
Resolution, the Revised Conditions of Approval hereby amend and replace the Previous
Conditions of Approval in their entirety. All references to the conditions of approval for the
Original CUP, Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654A, Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-
05654B, Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05654C, and Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-
05654D, shall be to the Revised Conditions of Approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B,
which shall control and govern the Original CUP, as amended by Conditional Use Permit No.
2013-05654D.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of
this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
- 4 - PC2017-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting
of May 1, 2017. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2017-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 1, 2017, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1st day of May,
2017.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 6 - PC2017-***
- 7 - PC2017-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05654D
(DEV2013-00005D)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
1 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim
Police Department to Police Department deter unlawful conduct of
employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and
movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbances to the
neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or
leaving the premises.
Police Department,
Planning &
Research Unit
2 No required parking area shall be fenced-off or otherwise enclosed for
outdoor storage uses.
Planning
Department,
Code Enforcement
Division
3 The trash enclosure shall be maintained in a location acceptable to
the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division, and in
accordance with approved plans on file with said Department.
Public Works
Department, Streets
and Sanitation
4 Performances shall not begin before 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
5 The theater shall be limited to a maximum of 210 seats. Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
6 The performances shall be limited to theatrical dramas, comedies,
musicals and plays. Activities at this business shall not trigger a
requirement for a sex-oriented business permit, as set forth in
Chapter 18.54 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
7 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type,
including advertising directed Police Department to the exterior from
within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic
beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which
are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this
condition.
Police Department,
Planning &
Research Unit
- 8 - PC2017-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
8 Any and all security officers provided shall comply with all State and
Local ordinances regulating their Police Department services,
including, without limitation, Chapter 11.5 of Division 3 of the
California Business and Profession Code. (Section 4.16.070
Anaheim Municipal Code).
Police Department,
Planning &
Research Unit
9 Applicant shall not share any profits, or pay any percentage or
commission to a promoter or any other person, based upon monies
collected as a door charge, cover charge, or any other form of
admission charge, including minimum drink orders, or the sale of
drinks.
Police Department,
Planning &
Research Unit
10 The number of persons attending the event shall not exceed the
maximum occupancy load as determined by the Anaheim Fire
Department. Signs indicating the occupant load shall be posted in a
conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the
room. (Section 25.114(a) Uniform Fire Code).
Police Department,
Planning &
Research Unit
11 All entertainers and employees shall be clothed in such a way as not
to be in violation of Section 7.16.060 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code.
Police Department,
Planning &
Research Unit
12 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent
area under the control of the business owner shall be removed or
painted over within 24 hours of being applied.
Planning
Department, Code
Enforcement
Division
13 All activities related to the use shall occur indoors, except as may be
permitted by an authorized Special Event Permit.
Planning
Department, Code
Enforcement
Division
14 No outside storage of equipment/furniture shall be permitted.
Planning
Department, Code
Enforcement
Division
15 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable
from the street. Number shall be illuminated during hours of
darkness. Front and rear entrance doors shall be numbered with the
same address numbers or suite number of the business. The address
number shall be a minimum height of four inches.
Police Department,
Planning &
Research Unit
- 9 - PC2017-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
16 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and
grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of
sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly
visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during
the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all
person, property, and vehicles on-site. All exterior doors shall have
their own light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas
at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or
about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons
exiting the building.
Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
SIGN CONDITIONS
17 The sign display shall be limited to displays of images related to
performances at the theater, events, and showtimes, with a minimum
10 second duration of an image. The sign shall not be used for
general adverstising of good and services.
Planning and
Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
18 The wall-mounted electronic readerboard sign display shall only be
operated between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m.
Planning and
Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
19 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above
shall be prominently displayed on plans submitted for permits. For
example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with
prior to the issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans
submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to grading
permits, final maps, street improvement plans, water and electrical
plans, landscape irrigation plans, security plans, parks and trail plans,
and fire and life safety plans, etc.
Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
20 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively
referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any
and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees
to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the
Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts
or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to
determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition
attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to
include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded
against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or
Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
- 10 - PC2017-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other
costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection
with such proceeding.
21 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the
issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building
permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all
charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or
may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
22 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by
the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department, and as conditioned herein.
Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
Creating a more compassionate, connected and creative Orange County
CHANCE THEATER
@ BETTE AITKEN theater arts CENTER
5522 E. La Palma Ave.
Anaheim, CA 92807
(888) 455-4212
www.ChanceTheater.com
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 3309
Orange, CA 92857
EIN: 11-3679644
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Scott B. Well, Chair
Larry Cripe, Vice-Chair
Andy Lamb, Treasurer
Mary Kay Fyda-Mar, Immed Past Chair
Bette Aitken
Martin Benson
Robert Berman
Susan Bowman
Susie Dittmar
Bruce Goodrich
Sandra Graham
Elizabeth Jones
Casey Long
Guy W. Marr
Rachelle Menaker
Oanh Nguyen
Terry Schomburg
Laurie Smits Staude
Georgia Well
RESIDENT ARTISTS
Oanh Nguyen*, Artistic Director
Casey Long*, Managing Director
Erika C. Miller*, Development Director
Masako Tobaru*, Technical Director
Bebe Herrera*, Production Manager
Teodora Ramos*, Master Carpenter
Jeff Hellebrand*, Box Office Associate
Jocelyn A. Brown*, Assoc Artistic Director
Jennifer Ruckman*, Literary Manager
Courtny Greenough*, Company Manager
Marc Sanford*, Assoc House Manager
Alex Bueno*
Rachel Oliveros Catalano
Sherry Domerego
Robert Foran
Laura M. Hathaway*
Robyn Manion
James McHale
Karen O’Hanlon
Sarah Pierce
Nicole Schlitt
Bill Strongin*
Kelly Todd*
Karen Webster*
*Artistic Council
City of Anaheim
Planning & Building
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
1st Floor
Anaheim, CA 92805
RE: LED leaderboard for Chance Theater
Chance Theater, located at 5522 E. La Palma Ave., is planning to install an LED
leaderboard marquee to promote productions and events happening at the facility.
We plan to have the marquee running from 9am to 12am on a regular basis.
The plans for the marquee are included with this letter. If you need any additional
information, please contact Managing Director Casey Long at (714) 900-3284.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Casey Long
Managing Director
Chance Theater
casey@chancetheater.com
(714) 900-3284 direct
(888) 455-4212 main
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
NTS NTS
Elevation
Total Sign Square Feet: 25.4NTS
LED Screen. Frame size: 90.7 in. wide x 40.3 in. tall with display being 88.2 in. wide x 37.8 in. tall.
Pitch size: 10mm, Color: Full color, Character height: 37.8 in., Max character: 14, Module matrix: 3Row x 7Column = 21 modules.
Pixel marix: 91 x 224, Number of pixels: 21504, Number of LEDs: 21504, Estimated weight: 125 lbs., Max power usage: 1032 watts.
Sign Details
Site Map
ARTWORK DISCLAIMER
Chance Theatre
22121
TJ
Kim
4.17.2017
22121_LED Screen.ai
2017/Chance Theatre
<>
REVISIONS
CLIENT APPROVAL
DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL
PROJECT MANAGER APPROVAL
FILE INFORMATION
1 of 1
LED
VIDEO SCREEN
BUILDING FRONTAGE 414 FT.
19’-5”
7’-6.7”PROPOSED SIGN LOCATION
40
.
3
”
90.7”
3
’
-
4
.
3
”
9
’
13
’
-
8
”
5522 E. LA PALMA AVE.
ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92807
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
AT
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
NO
.
5
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 1, 2017
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05908
LOCATION: 2211 East Orangewood Avenue
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Lyon-
Integral Anaheim Owner, LLC, represented by Ashley Liddiard.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow
a coordinated sign program for The George apartment community.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the
California Environmental Quality Act (Class 11, Accessory Structures) and approving
Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05908.
BACKGROUND: The General Plan designates this property for Mixed Use land
uses. The property is within the “I” Industrial Zone and the “PTMU” Platinum
Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The City Council approved the 340-unit “George”
apartment community in 2013 through a development agreement in accordance with
the PTMU Overlay Zone. The applicant began construction of the parking structure
and apartments in 2016. The applicant anticipates occupancy of the first units in July
2017 and completion in January 2018. Surrounding land uses include the Angel
Stadium parking lot to the north and east, vacant land entitled with the LT Platinum
Center project to the west, and Golden Road Brewery (under construction) to the south
across Orangewood Avenue.
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to
allow a coordinated sign program for the for the 340-unit apartment community. The
applicant proposes five building mounted wall signs and one monument sign as part of
the coordinated program. The details of the sign program are provided in Exhibit C of
the attached Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution. Exhibit C is part of a larger
sign package that includes smaller signs like directional signs, directories, fire lane
signs, etc. While shown on the plans, these signs are permitted by right and not a part
of this coordinated sign program request.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05908
May 1, 2017
Page 2 of 5
PROPERTY LOCATION
The sign locations proposed by the applicant are identified in the site plan below:
Roof and Wall Signs
A and B
Wall Signs
C and D
Wall Sign F
Monument Sign G
Leasing Sign E Dupont Drive
Or
a
n
g ew
o
o
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05908
May 1, 2017
Page 3 of 5
The roof sign was designed by the applicant to mimic sign architecture found in traditional
baseball stadiums and would be installed above the roof with elevated rafters. The wall signs
proposed by the applicant are to identify the project from Orangewood Avenue and the
surrounding properties. The leasing sign is a wall sign mounted above the entry to the leasing
center. The monument sign is located at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Dupont
Drive. The applicant has proposed this sign to direct motorists to the apartments. The applicant
has designed the proposed signs to reflect and complement the architecture of the building and
the surrounding buildings in the Platinum Triangle.
CORNER OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE AND DUPONT DRIVE
Sign Location Type Height Width Area
A Faces Angel Stadium parking
lot and 57 Freeway
Roof 3.25 ft. 23 ft. 75 sq. ft.
B Faces Angel Stadium parking
lot and 57 Freeway
Wall 1.25 ft. 14.6 ft. 18 sq. ft.
C Northeast Corner of building
Faces Angel Stadium
Wall 2 ft. 13.3 ft. 27 sq. ft.
D Northeast Corner of building
Faces Angel Stadium
Wall 2 ft. 13.3 ft. 27 sq. ft.
E Fronts Dupont Drive Wall 2.75 ft. 14.5 ft. 40 sq. ft.
F Southwest corner building
Faces Orangewood/Dupont
Intersection
Wall 2 ft. 13.3 ft. 27 sq. ft.
G Orangewood/Dupont
Intersection
Monument 10 ft.
8.25 ft. 82.5 sq. ft.
Sign copy is
33.75 ft.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05908
May 1, 2017
Page 4 of 5
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
The PTMU Overlay Zone requires that the applicant submit a coordinated sign program to the
Planning Department prior to the issuance of the first sign permit. Residential uses in the PTMU
Overlay Zone are subject to the same sign code requirements as all other multiple-family
residential zones. The Code permits one sign per frontage or two signs per frontage if the
applicant proposes monument wall signs, located on opposite sides of main driveway/pedestrian
entrance. These signs may have a maximum sign area of 20 square feet and a maximum height of
four feet for monument signs. If the coordinated sign program meets these Code requirements,
staff can approve the signs through a ministerial approval. However, in order to provide design
flexibility within the Platinum Triangle, if a project cannot meet these requirements, the Planning
Commission may approve the coordinated sign program subject to the approval of a conditional
use permit. In the case of The George apartment community, staff believes that design flexibility
with regards to the coordinated sign program would be appropriate due to the location of the
project. The standard multi-family residential sign code requirements are not well suited to
identify a large-scale development project therefore necessitating a more comprehensive sign
program to seamlessly distinguish the community.
Before the Planning Commission can approve the conditional use permit, it must make a finding
of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by this code;
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the
particular area or health and safety;
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the
area; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if
any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
In addition, the Planning Commission must also make the following findings specific to approval
of a coordinated sign program:
1) Signs shall complement the architecture of the buildings on the same property and
provide a unifying element along the streetscape; and
2) The size, scale and style of signs shall be internally consistent and consistent with
the scale of the buildings located on the same property and the surrounding land
uses.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05908
May 1, 2017
Page 5 of 5
The proposed signs were designed to be in proportion with the architecture and size of the
approved building. The roof sign compliments a similar sign over the main entrance to Angel
Stadium, tying it into the baseball theme. Rafter signs such as this one have been approved in
the city for residential development where appropriate, including the Uptown Village, the
Broadway Arms, and Carnegie Plaza buildings. The proposed wall signs are designed to provide
improved visibility to motorists and the monument sign is intended as a directional sign into the
community. This proposal is consistent with other coordinated sign programs recently approved
in the Platinum Triangle including the Axis office development also on Orangewood east of this
project which has similarly sized monument signs, and the Jefferson Platinum Triangle
apartment project on Katella Avenue. The implementation of this coordinated sign program
would better serve The George apartment community by providing project identification,
improved visibility and cohesive design elements. The sizes of the signs would be consistent
with the scale of the building and surrounding buildings, provide a unifying and identifying
element along the streetscape and would not adversely affect adjoining land uses or future
growth and development in the area. Additionally, the signs would serve as the necessary means
of identification for visitors, deliveries, and emergency vehicles to the 340-unit apartment
complex. Overall, the implementation of a coordinated sign program would provide project
identification, improved visibility and cohesive design elements. Therefore, staff recommends
approval of this request.
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the
effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e.,
Class 11 – Accessory Structures) which consist of construction, or placement of minor structures
accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, and that,
therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the
proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
CONCLUSION: The proposed signs would complement the apartment community’s design
and architecture, are appropriately designed, and are consistent with the scale of the surrounding
buildings. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Scott Koehm Jonathan E. Borrego
Senior Planner Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution
2. Letter of Request/Justification
3. Plans
I (PTMU)Stadium District Sub-Area CDEV 2017-00021George Apartments
I (PTMU)Gateway DistrictSub-Area BGATEWAY APARTMENT
C-G (PTMU)OrangewoodPARKING LOT
PR (PTMU)Stadium DistrictSub-Area AANGEL STADIUMOF ANAHEIM
I (PTMU)Stadium District Sub-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)Stadium District Sub-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)Stadium District Sub-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)OrangewoodINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)OrangewoodBREWERY
I (PTMU)OrangewoodINDUSTRIAL
PR (PTMU)Stadium DistrictSub-Area AANGEL STADIUMOF ANAHEIM
E ORANGEWOOD AVE
D U P O N T D R
S D U P O N T D R
E. KATELLA AVE
S . H A S T E R S T
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. CHAPMAN AVE
E. GENE AUTRY WAY S .D O U G L A S S
R DE. HOWELL AVE
2 2 1 1 Ea st Orangewood Avenue
D E V N o. 2017-00021
Subject Property APN: 083-273-01
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16
E ORANGEWOOD AVE
D U P O N T D R
S D U P O N T D R
E. KATELLA AVE
S . H A S T E R S T
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. CHAPMAN AVE
E. GENE AUTRY WAY S .D O U G L A S S
R DE. HOWELL AVE
2 2 1 1 Ea st Orangewood Avenue
D E V N o. 2017-00021
Subject Property APN: 083-273-01
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2017-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2017-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2017-05908 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2017-00021)
(2211 EAST ORANGEWOOD AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05908 to
conditionally permit a coordinated sign program in association with The George apartment
community at 2211 East Orangewood Avenue in the City of Anaheim (the Property"). The
Property is generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein
by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 3.8-acres, is currently under
construction with a new residential apartment community consisting of 340 dwelling units. The
Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Mixed Use land
uses. The Property is located in the “I” Industrial Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use
(PTMU) Overlay Zone and the property owner has the option to develop the property in
accordance with either the “I” Industrial Zone or the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU)
Overlay Zone; and
WHEREAS, the Property has been developed in accordance with the development
standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay
Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"). Subsection .010 of Section 18.20.150
(Signs) of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Code
requires that a "coordinated sign program" be submitted to the Planning Department and must
address the following:
(1) Signs shall complement the architecture of the building and provide a unifying
element along the streetscape;
(2) The size, scale, and style of signs shall be internally consistent, and consistent with
the scale of the buildings of which they are a part; and
(3) Wall signs for ground floor uses shall be placed between the doorway and the upper
façade, and shall be located at approximately the same height as all other ground floor wall signs
to create a unifying, horizontal pattern.
WHEREAS, signs for residential uses developed in accordance with the Platinum
Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone shall also be subject to the requirements of Section
18.44.070 (Signs in Residential Zones) of Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the Code; and if said signs do
not conform to these requirements, per Section 18.44.055 (Coordinated Sign Program) of
Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the Code, the coordinated sign program shall be subject to the approval
- 2 - PC2017-***
of a conditional use permit and the required findings in 18.66.060 (Findings) of Chapter 18.66
(Conditional Use Permits) of the Code and the additional findings listed above.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on May 1, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of
the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate
and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the
preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the
Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 11 –
Accessory Structures) which consists of the "construction, or replacement of minor structures
accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities. Section
15311 of the CEQA Guidelines provides examples of projects that qualify for an exemption from
the provisions of CEQA. The example that is applicable to the Proposed Project is for on-
premise signs The Proposed Project fits within that example and, pursuant to Section 15311 of
the CEQA Guidelines, will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05908, does find and
determine the following facts:
1) That the signs complement the architecture of the buildings on the same
property and provide a unifying element along the streetscape; and
2) The size, scale and style of signs are internally consistent, and consistent with
the scale of the buildings located on the same property and the surrounding
land uses.
3) That there will not be any signs for ground floor uses as the project includes
only residential uses.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05908, does find and
determine the following facts:
- 3 - PC2017-***
1. The proposed request to permit a coordinated sign program at the premises is
subject to a conditional use permit authorized under Section No. 18.44.055.040 of Chapter 18.44
(Signs) of the Code.
2. The proposed conditional use permit, as conditioned herein, would not adversely
affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located because the signs will be of a quality design that is internally consistent and
complement the architecture of the buildings within the apartment community;
3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development
of the proposed project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and
safety because the proposed signs will be internally consistent and located out of any line-of-
sight areas.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed project will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area there will be
no traffic generated by this use.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not
be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed
project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval for the use
and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05908, contingent upon and subject to the conditions
of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under
Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05908 in order to preserve the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete
conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code.
Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director
upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the
original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and
(iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or
approved development.
- 4 - PC2017-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of
this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of May 1, 2017. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter
18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2017-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 1, 2017, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1st day of May, 2017.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 6 - PC2017-***
- 7 - PC2017-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05908
(DEV2017-00021)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SIGN PERMITS
1 Any future signs for the apartment community shall be in
substantial conformance with the coordinated sign program. All
new signs must be reviewed and approved by Planning
Department staff.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
2 Any future signs for the apartment community that do not comply
with the Zoning Code may be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director, provided that the signs are in substantial
conformance with the coordinated sign program.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
3 No sign shall be permitted within line-of-sight triangles located at
street intersections or driveways adjacent to streets.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
4 No sign shall be permitted within the Public Right of Way.
Public Works
Department,
Development Services
Division
GENERAL CONDITIONS
5 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of
the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building
permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all
charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or
may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
6 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively
referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from
any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against
Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
- 8 - PC2017-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the
proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to
the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or
validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s
indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to,
damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by
Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including
without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and
expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such
proceeding.
7 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
- 9 - PC2017-***
EXHIBIT “C”
COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05908
(DEV2017-00021)
THE GEORGE – JUSTIFICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Brand Overview
In 1857, George Hansen played a major role in founding Anaheim, the prosperous, city of kindness, as we now know it. As a nod to
‘The Father of Anaheim’, we branded our new Anaheim apartment community ‘The George’ and carefully selected the brand font
and colors to applaud the close proximity of Angel’s baseball stadium, showing support for our local team.
Tertiary Project ID Sign – Sign Type A-3
The Tertiary Project ID sign has been designed in line with the proposed signage package, to complement the surrounding
community of Anaheim. Deep, rich earthy tones are accompanied with bold lettering, chosen to flatter branding and signage of the
adjacent Angel Stadium. These sensitive color and font selections remain the same throughout the signage package to keep a
consistent and uniformed look. Although daring fonts and colors have been chosen, the proposed sign has been correctly
proportioned in elevation to ensure that it is unobtrusive and sensitive to the Platinum Triangle area.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Featuring elevated rafters, the tertiary project ID sign gives a nod to the history and long standing tradition of American Baseball
scoreboards found in ballparks across the United States. Rafters are a common feature in stadiums and can also be found at the
Angel Stadium entrance sign that reads ‘Angel Stadium’. The proposed rafters elevate the sign for the building to ensure easy
identification, during daylight and when lit at night.
Production and installation will be in accordance with the most current California laws to ensure the proposed sign will be
structurally sound, not detrimental to health and safety of the area.
An addition of ‘Luxury Leasing’, sign type A-20 identifies the use of The George, assisting visitors with way finding and easing
traffic flow.
Leasing Identification Sign – Sign Type A-21
The Leasing Identification Sign to the exterior of the building is hugely important for identification purposes and easing
surrounding traffic. In aiding with the identification of the building, visitors and passersby are easily guided. The proposed addition
is compliant with the signage package design where constant fonts and colors are used.
Bid Document 12-16-16The George apartments 1 Revised: 3-7-17ATTACHMENT NO. 3
NORTH
19
.
2
19
.
3
A-
1
1
.
1
A-12.1 A-12.2
A-
1
2
.
3
A-
1
2
.
4
A-
1
2
.
5
A-
7
.
3
A-
8
.
3
A-
3
.
1
A-
2
0
.
1
A-
8
.
2
A-
8
.
1
A-
9
.
5
A-7.1 A-7.2 A-4.3 A-4.2 A-19.1
A-
4
.
1
A-9.4 A-1.1
A-
5
.
1
A-
1
3
.
1
A-
2
1
.
1
A-
1
6
.
1
A-
1
7
.
1
A-
1
6
.
2
A-
1
7
.
2
A-
1
5
.
1
A-
1
5
.
2
A-5.2
A-
9
.
2
A-
1
8
.
2
A-18.1
A-
9
.
1
A-
9
.
3
A-
6
.
1
A-
1
0
.
1
Ex
t
e
r
i
o
r
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
”
=
6
0
’
-
0
”
1
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-LP.1 12-16-16A-Series Signage Location PlanA-3.1 Sign TypeLocationSignageGroupA Series - Sign Type Summary No. Sign Types Quantities A-1 Primary Project Identification Sign 1 A-2 Secondary Project Identification Sign 1 A-3 Tertiary Project Identification Sign 1 A-4 Building Address 3 A-5 Parking Regulation Sign 2 A-6 Stop Sign 1 A-7 Fire Lane Sign 3 A-8 Wayfinding Directory Sign 3 A-9 Wayfinding Entry Sign 5 A-10 Building Entry Directory 1 A-11 Fire Door Sign 1 A-12 Misc Identification Sign 5 A-13 Vehicular Directional Sign 1 A-14 Pedestrian Entry Sign 7** A-15 Vehicular Control Sign 2 A-16 Resident Move-In Sign 2 A-17 Trash Loading Sign 2 A-18 ADA Path of Travel Sign 2 A-19 Apartment Identification Sign 3 A-20 Tagline Identification Sign 1 A-21 Leasing Identification Sign 1 **Precise locations to be determined in field by owner representative.A-Series - Site Signage Legend Sign Location
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Dateremoved from scope 1 3-7-17 – Removed A-2 from scope
APARTMENT HOMES
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-1.1 12-16-16Sign Type A-1 Primary Project Identification Sign
Pa
r
t
i
a
l
W
e
s
t
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
g
n
A
-
1
.
1
(
w
i
t
h
S
i
g
n
A
-
1
9
.
1
s
h
o
w
n
)
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
1 3-7-17 – Added Arrow
LU
X
U
R
Y
L
E
A
S
I
N
G
LUXURY LEASING
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
to
p
fr
o
n
t
-
s
i
d
e
a
s
i
d
e
De
t
a
i
l
V
i
e
w
s
Sc
a
l
e
:
3
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
7'
-
6
"
7'
-
6
"
10
'
-
0
"
8'
-
3
3
/
1
6
"
6'
-
8
7
/
8
"
2'
-
1
1
3
/
4
"
1'
-
1
"
ty
p
.
4'
-
6
1
/
4
"
3/
4
"
t
y
p
.
1'
-
3
1
/
4
"
1'
-
1
0
"
2'
-
7
"
3"3"
9
3
/
1
6
"
9
3
/
1
6
"
9"
4'
-
8
1
/
2
"
Sign Type A-1 - Primary Project ID Sign Double sided, poured in place concrete monument sign with board formed wood grain finished body, 1/2” painted acrylic arrow pin-mounted 1/4“ off body with studs and spacers, and internal conduit to pans for illumination. 2” deep, fabricated, painted, .090 aluminum sign pans with flush push-thru sign white acrylic logo, and halo illumination. Pans to be mounted 1 1/2” off 3“ deep, fabricated aluminum panels mounted to concrete body. Color Monument Body Board Formed Concrete*Aluminum Panels P3 Sign Pans P1 Studs & Spacers P3 Note Precise location to be determined in field by Lyon Development.*Sample to be provided by Lyon Development Front Side B Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"2
te
x
t
o
n
p
a
n
e
l
el
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
u
i
t
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-1.2 12-16-16Sign Type A-1 Primary Project Identification Sign
eq
u
a
l
eq
u
a
l
8"
8"
1'
-
2
"
1 3-7-17 – Added Arrow
LU
X
U
R
Y
L
E
A
S IN G
in
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
s
p
a
c
e
1'
-
5
"
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-3.1 12-16-16Sign Type A-3 Tertiary Project Identification Sign
Pa
r
t
i
a
l
E
a
s
t
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
g
n
A
-
3
.
1
(
w
i
t
h
A
-
2
0
.
1
s
h
o
w
n
)
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-3.2 12-16-16Sign Type A-3 Tertiary Project Identification Sign
fr
o
n
t
sideSign Type A-3 - Tertiary Project ID Sign 10” deep, fabricated, internally illuminated, face-lit, painted, .1/8” wall aluminum logo. Logo to be mounted to rooftop with architectural supports, support design and fabrication to be verified through engineering specifications. Color Faces of Logo P1 Edges of Logo P2 Architectural Supports P2 Note Precise location to be determined in field by Lyon Development.
De
t
a
i
l
V
i
e
w
s
Sc
a
l
e
:
3
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
1'
-
4
"
3'
-
4
"
22
'
-
1
1
"
1'
-
5
"
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
Pa
r
t
i
a
l
W
e
s
t
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
g
n
A
-
1
9
.
1
(
w
i
t
h
S
i
g
n
A
-
1
.
1
s
h
o
w
n
)
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-19.1 12-16-16Sign Type A-19 Apartment Identification Signin available space in available space
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-19.2 12-16-16Sign Type A-19 Apartment Identification Sign
Pa
r
t
i
a
l
N
o
r
t
h
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
g
n
A
-
1
9
.
2
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
th
e
w
o
r
d
“
G
E
O
R
G
E
”
o
n
w
i
n
d
o
w
b
e
l
o
w
in
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
s
p
a
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-19.3 12-16-16Sign Type A-19 Apartment Identification Sign
in
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
s
p
a
c
e
Pa
r
t
i
a
l
E
a
s
t
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
g
n
A
-
1
9
.
3
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
in available space
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-19.4 12-16-16Sign Type A-19 Apartment Identification SignSign Type A-19 - Apartment Identification Sign “George”: 5” deep, fabricated, painted, .090 aluminum, reverse-pan channel, halo-lit, logo. Logo to be pin-mounted off face of building with studs & spacers, studs & spacers to be painted to match building face. “The”: 3 1/2” deep, fabricated, painted, .090 aluminum, reverse-pan channel, halo-lit, logo. Logo to be pin-mounted off face of building with studs & spacers, studs & spacers to be painted to match building face. Color Copy P1 Studs & Spacers To match wall surface behind Note Precise location to be determined in field by Lyon Development.Sign Fabricator to provide lighting test with Lyon & The Design Factor to ensure proper lighting is achieved prior to completion of sign type. Lighting needs to be completed in such a way that it is most visible at night but does not enter into any apartment.
De
t
a
i
l
V
i
e
w
s
-
T
y
p
i
c
a
l
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
2
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
fr
o
n
t
side
13
'
-
4
5
/
8
"
2'
-
0
"
9
1
/
4
"
Pa
r
t
i
a
l
E
a
s
t
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
g
n
A
-
2
0
.
1
(
w
i
t
h
S
i
g
n
A
-
3
.
1
s
h
o
w
n
)
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
LU
X
U
R
Y
L
E
A
S
I
N
G
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-20.1 12-16-16Sign Type A-20 Tagline Identification Sign
in
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
s
p
a
c
e
in available space
LU
X
U
R
Y
L
E
A
S
I
N
G
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-20.2 12-16-16Sign Type A-20 Tagline Identification SignSign Type A-20 - Tagline Identification Sign 3 1/2” deep, fabricated, painted, .090 aluminum, reverse-pan channel, halo-lit, logo. Logo to be pin-mounted off face of building with studs & spacers, studs & spacers to be painted to match building face. Color Copy P5 Studs & Spacers To match wall surface behind Note Precise location to be determined in field by Lyon Development.Sign Fabricator to provide lighting test with Lyon & The Design Factor to ensure proper lighting is achieved prior to completion of sign type. Lighting needs to be completed in such a way that it is most visible at night but does not enter into any apartment.
De
t
a
i
l
V
i
e
w
s
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
2
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
fr
o
n
t
side
1'
-
3
1
/
2
"
14
'
-
7
1
/
4
"
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title Date
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
A-21.1 12-16-16Sign Type A-21 Leasing Identification Sign
Pa
r
t
i
a
l
W
e
s
t
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
g
n
A
-
2
1
.
1
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
in
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
s
p
a
c
e
in
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
s
p
a
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Sheet Number Revision Sheet Title DateSign Type A-21 - Leasing Identification Sign “George”: 5” deep, fabricated, painted, .090 aluminum, reverse-pan channel, halo-lit, logo. Logo to be pin-mounted off face of building with studs & spacers, studs & spacers to be painted to match building face. “The”: 3 1/2” deep, fabricated, painted, .090 aluminum, reverse-pan channel, halo-lit, logo. Logo to be pin-mounted off face of building with studs & spacers, studs & spacers to be painted to match building face. Color Copy P2 Studs & Spacers To match wall surface behind Note Precise location to be determined in field by Lyon Development.
De
t
a
i
l
V
i
e
w
s
Sc
a
l
e
:
1
/
2
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
fr
o
n
t
side
4'
-
9
"
11
"
2'
-
9
"
14
'
-
6
"
A-21.2 Sign Type A-21 Leasing Identification Sign
26
4
3
2
L
a
s
A
l
t
u
r
a
s
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
L
a
g
u
n
a
H
i
l
l
s
,
C
A
9
2
6
5
3
Ph
.
(
9
4
9
)
3
6
0
-
5
7
5
0
F
x
.
(
9
4
9
)
6
4
3
-
2
8
6
3
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
@
c
o
x
.
n
e
t
w
w
w
.
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
.
b
i
z
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
12-16-16
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.