The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 2017/08/07 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: AUGUST 7, 2017 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 LOCATION: 1921-1931 East Wright Circle (Brewheim Brewing Company) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The agent is Phillip Schwartze of the PRS Group. The applicant is Brewheim Brewing Company represented by Dan Ward and William Camacho. The property owner is Finn Holdings, LLC. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements to permit alcoholic beverage manufacturing (a brewery) within an existing industrial building: (i) a Conditional Use Permit to allow a tasting room that exceeds 750 square feet; and, (ii) a Parking Variance to permit fewer parking spaces than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (Code). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolutions, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919 and Variance No. 2017-05093. BACKGROUND: On July 10, 2017, the Planning Commission reviewed a request from the applicant to permit a 16,601 square foot brewery within an existing 22,945 square foot industrial building. The brewery would have a 2,379 square foot tasting room and 1,676 square foot outdoor patio. The request included an Administrative Adjustment to permit fewer parking spaces than required by the Code; and, a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit on and off-premises sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages. The Commission continued its deliberation of the item to the August 7, 2017 Commission meeting in order to allow time for the applicant to meet with the surrounding community to discuss concerns related to the proposed project. The proposed brewery would be located in the Platinum Triangle within the Industrial Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The General Plan designates the property for Mixed Use land uses. Surrounding land uses include a self- storage facility to the north, industrial uses to the east and south, the Stadium Lofts Condominium Community (Stadium Lofts) to the southeast across Wright Circle, and the Jefferson Platinum Triangle Apartment Community to the west, which is under construction. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 August 7, 2017 Page 2 of 9 Prior to the July 10, 2017 Commission meeting, Staff received four emails from Stadium Lofts residents which were included as attachments to the Planning Commission staff report. Additionally, during the Commission meeting, five members of the public and the Commission raised several concerns about the project. These issues related primarily to potential noise concerns; however, other concerns included lighting, privacy, traffic, and parking. The Commission continued the hearing to the August 7, 2017 meeting so that the applicant and staff could further review these issues. Additionally, the Planning Commission directed the applicant to meet with the residents at Stadium Lofts. To address these concerns, the applicant met with the residents from Stadium Lofts on Thursday, July 20 at the Brewheim Brewing Company location. Thirteen Stadium Lofts residents attended. In addition, staff was also present to provide technical assistance. The applicant has made several changes to the project based on the comments received prior to and at the Commission meeting and from the discussion at the community meeting. The applicant is proposing to reduce the size of the outdoor patio from 1,676 square feet to 1,000 square feet and the interior tasting room from 2,379 square feet to 2,120 square feet. The Code permits a brewery with a 1,000 square foot patio by right; however, a tasting room that is over 750 square feet requires a conditional use permit. The applicant is also proposing to reduce its hours of operation and incorporate architectural features on the outdoor patio to reduce potential noise impacts. The proposal section below further describes these changes. Due to the reduction in the size of the proposed outdoor patio area and interior tasting room, there is a reduced parking demand. As a result, the property owner proposes to accommodate parking on site without the originally proposed valet parking. Although the site can accommodate more valet parking than standard parking because valet parking spaces can be stacked, the removal of valet parking would remove noise impacts that may be associated with patrons waiting for their cars, or issues with patrons parking off-site because they do not want to use valet. As previously proposed, the Code required 99 spaces for the proposed brewery and adjacent industrial tenant. To accommodate these uses, the applicant was proposing a combination of 84 standard and valet parking spaces. This is a 16% deviation from Code required parking, which is subject to the approval of an Administrative Adjustment. With the smaller tasting room and outdoor patio, the Code requires 84 parking spaces for the brewery and adjacent industrial tenant. To accommodate these uses, the applicant is proposing 61 parking spaces (no valet). This is a 28% deviation from the Code required parking and is subject to the approval of a Parking Variance. An analysis to support this Parking Variance follows later in this report. The proposed project requires a Type 23 (Small Beer Manufacturer- Brew Pub or Microbrewery) license, which authorizes a brewery with an accessory tasting room. The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) issues this license. Following the July 10, 2017 Commission meeting, City staff clarified with ABC that a Determination of Public Convenience and Necessity for on and off premises sales of alcohol would not be required for a Type 23 License. Staff has subsequently removed the Determination of Public Convenience and Necessity from the list of requested/required entitlements. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 August 7, 2017 Page 3 of 9 PROPOSAL: Other than the changes described above, the applicant has not made any other changes to the proposed brewery. The applicant is continuing to propose a 16,601 square foot brewery within an existing industrial building. The adjacent 6,344 square foot industrial tenant would continue to occupy the remaining space in the 22,945 square foot industrial building. The brewery would include a beer storage and manufacturing room; retail area; restrooms; 2,120 square foot tasting room; and a 1,000 square foot outdoor patio. The sale of beer for both on and off-premises consumption would be limited to the product brewed on-site. The proposed tasting room would be located within the building and the outdoor patio area would include seating, a fire pit, and landscaping to serve as a green screen surrounding the outdoor patio to address privacy and noise concerns. A grain silo would be located near the front entrance of the tasting room. Access to the outdoor patio would be through the tasting room. Due to the reduction in size of the proposed outdoor patio area and interior tasting room, there is a reduced parking demand. Conceptual Rendering (Outdoor Patio) Brewing operations would involve five employees with the potential to increase to ten after several years of operations. The tasting room would also include five to ten employees. The applicant has indicated that peak operation of the manufacturing and tasting room would not overlap and therefore it would be unlikely that more than ten employees would be on site at any time. The applicant is not proposing a kitchen or any type of on-site food preparation. Any food trucks provided on site would park at the rear of the building. The applicant has not changed the requested hours of operation for beer manufacturing. However, the applicant has reduced the hours of operation for the tasting room and the outdoor patio. The following table shows the previous and proposed hours of operation. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 August 7, 2017 Page 4 of 9 Use Original Hours Proposed Hours Sunday-Thursday Friday & Saturday Sunday-Thursday Friday & Saturday Tasting Room 10 am - Midnight 10 am - Midnight Noon – 10 pm Noon to Midnight Outdoor Patio 10 am – Midnight 10 am – Midnight Noon – 9 pm Noon – 9 pm Beer Manufacturing 6 am – 2 pm 6 am – 2 pm 6 am – 2 pm 6 am – 2 pm Site Plan Industrial Tenant – Not a part CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 August 7, 2017 Page 5 of 9 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Property owners within the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone may develop their properties in accordance with the Overlay Zone or the underlying base zone, which, in this case, is the Industrial Zone. The property owner is electing to improve and operate the subject property under the Industrial Zone. The Code permits Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing by right in the Industrial Zone. The Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing use class consists of establishments that produce or manufacture alcoholic beverages of all types. Businesses under this use class may sell alcohol produced or manufactured on the alcoholic beverage manufacturer’s licensed premises for On-Sale or Off-Sale consumption. Typical uses include breweries, distilleries and wineries. Tasting rooms may be included in conjunction with the manufacturing. A Conditional Use Permit is required if the tasting room is over 750 square feet and/or if an outdoor patio that exceeds 1,000 square feet. Therefore, a Conditional Use Permit is required for this request because the applicant is proposing a 2,120 square foot tasting room. Staff does not anticipate that the addition of the larger tasting room would adversely affect the adjoining land uses, if the business owner operates the use in a responsible manner and in compliance with the recommended conditions of approval. These conditions include typical Police Department conditions for similar uses, such as requiring that there shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. ABC LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training would be required for employees. In addition, the conditions of approval require the brewery to cease the sale of beer 30 minutes prior to closing and limit the use of the outdoor patio to 9:00 p.m. to reduce the potential for noise impacts upon adjacent residential uses. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 August 7, 2017 Page 6 of 9 Although not being requested at this time, any future indoor entertainment, including live music, would require approval of a separate Entertainment Permit. Through the permit review process, staff would have the ability to require certain protections to ensure that the music does not disturb any nearby residents. Any outdoor entertainment proposed in the future would be significantly limited and only allowed up to four times a year through the issuance of a Special Event Permit. Similar to an Entertainment Permit, a Special Even Permit could include restrictions to ensure that such entertainment does not disturb surrounding properties. Any outdoor entertainment in excess of the four events permitted by the Special Event Permit would require a Conditional Use Permit. Based on the resident meeting and the modifications made by the applicant, staff believes that the applicant has addressed many of the original concerns regarding the project. The draft resolution includes revised conditions of approval to address these concerns and capture the modifications made by the applicant. Recommended conditions of approval include:  The tasting room shall close at 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on Friday and Saturday. Alcohol sales shall cease 30 minutes prior to the closing of the tasting room.  The outdoor patio shall close at 9:00 p.m. daily.  There shall be no entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted on the premises at any time unless the property owner/tenant has obtained proper permits from the City of Anaheim.  The property owner/tenant shall provide adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings. Lighting shall be of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. Traffic generated by the proposed project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and would not create a significant traffic impact. Therefore, staff does not anticipate that the proposed project would impose undue burden on the local streets and highways. Staff confirmed these assumptions through its review of a Trip Generation Memorandum submitted by the applicant. The memo indicated that the proposed use would not result in an excess of 100 vehicle trips. The City’s Traffic Study Guidelines state that a traffic study is required when staff expects a project’s trip generation to exceed 100 vehicle trips in the a.m. or p.m. peak hour. In this case, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition, estimates that the project would generate 60 vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour. The applicant has indicated that peak operations would occur between 4:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook estimates that the previous industrial use would generate 17 p.m. peak hour trips; therefore, the proposed use would result in an increase of 43 vehicle trips. The proposed project would generate traffic well below the City’s Traffic Study threshold of 100 vehicle trips and therefore, a traffic study is not required. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 August 7, 2017 Page 7 of 9 The proposed brewery is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan because it would contribute to the vitality of the Platinum Triangle as “a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities. Based on the above factors, staff believes that the proposed use would be compatible with the surrounding area and recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Parking Variance: Before the Planning Commission may approve a parking variance, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off- street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use; 2) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; 3) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; 4) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use; and 5) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The Code establishes the parking demand for the project by combining all existing and proposed uses. The Code requires 84 parking spaces for the property, including the proposed project, as shown in the following table. In addition, the table shows the proposed staggered hours of operation. The applicant has indicated that peak demand for the tasting room and outdoor patio would occur between 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. During this peak demand period, there would be no demand for parking for the beer manufacturing and little or no parking demand for the other industrial tenant. Without the industrial tenant and the alcohol beverage manufacturing, the demand for parking would be 53 spaces, which the property could accommodate with the 61 parking spaces available on-site. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 August 7, 2017 Page 8 of 9 Use Code Required Parking Proposed Floor Area Spaces Required Hours of Operation Sunday- Thursday Friday & Saturday Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing 1.55 spaces/1,000 s.f.* 13,526 s.f. 21 6 a.m. to 2 p.m. 6 a.m. to 2 p.m. Tasting Room 17 spaces/1,000 s.f. 2,120 s.f. 36 Noon to 10 p.m. Noon to Midnight Outdoor Patio 17spaces/ 1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f. 17 Noon to 9 p.m. Noon to 9 p.m. Industrial Tenant** 1.5 spaces/1,000 s.f. 6,344 s.f. 10 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. (Mon- Fri) 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. (Sat & Sun) 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. (Mon- Fri) 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. (Sat & Sun) TOTAL 84 * May include 10 percent office space. **Adjacent industrial tenant will be leased by Brewheim beginning August 2018, to be used for additional alcohol beverage manufacturing space. Furthermore, since the project is located within the Platinum Triangle, it is within walking distance to several planned and recently constructed residential developments. The applicant states that the unique urban environment and the increase in rideshare services such as Uber and Lyft reduces the reliance of customers on vehicles to access the brewery. Based on the above information, staff believes that the number of parking spaces proposed would be adequate to accommodate the proposed brewery without impact to the surrounding public streets or properties. Staff is recommending conditions of approval to ensure the successful management of the on-site parking such as the requirement for, adequate lighting and directional signs to the parking facilities. Staff received five new emails in support of the proposed brewery and one new email in opposition. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 August 7, 2017 Page 9 of 9 CONCLUSION: The applicant has designed the proposed establishment of the brewery and tasting room primarily for the commercial production of beer for off-site distribution to retail customers and restaurants. The tasting room and outdoor patio account for only a portion of the business which will serve visitors and residents in the Platinum Triangle area. However, based on concerns from the nearby residents, the applicant has agreed to reduce the outdoor patio and interior tasting room in order to address some of the concerns raised by the residents. The revised operations and recommended conditions of approval would ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Because the nature of the use is primarily beer manufacturing with an accessory component of retail sales and beer tasting, staff believes it is compatible with the surrounding industrial uses, and recommends approval of the request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Lindsay Ortega Jonathan E. Borrego Contract Planner, Lilley Planning Group Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution 2. Revised Letter of Operation 3. Parking Variance Justification 4. Police Memorandum 5. Complete Plan Set 6. Public Correspondence 7. Community Meeting Email 8. Community Meeting Flyer 9. July 10, 2017 Planning Commission Staff Report I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BJEFFERSON PLATINUMTRIANGLE APARTMENTS I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BMIXED USE I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BMAGNOLIAPARK I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BTILE STORE ITILE STORE I (P T M U ) K a t e l l a S u b -A r e a B J E F F E R S O N P L A T I N U M T R I A N G L E A P A R T M E N T S I (PTMU)KatellaSub-Area BBANK I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BPARK VIRIDIAN APTS I (PTMU)OfficeSELFSTORAGEFACILITY I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BRETAIL I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)KatellaSub-Area BINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)KatellaSub-Area BINDUSTRIAL S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E W R IGH T CIR S A U B U R N W A Y S C A M P T O N A V E E WRIGHT CIR S R I G N E Y W A Y E. KATELLA AVE S . L E W I S S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S . S U N K I S T S T S . A N A H E I M B L V D S . H A S T E R S T E. GENE AUTRY WAY S .D O U G L A S S R D S . C L E M E N T I N E S T 1 9 2 1 -1931 East Wright Circle D E V N o. 2017-00051 Subject Property APN: 082-261-10 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16 S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E W R IGH T CIR S A U B U R N W A Y S C A M P T O N A V E E WRIGHT CIR S R I G N E Y W A Y E. KATELLA AVE S . L E W I S S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S . S U N K I S T S T S . A N A H E I M B L V D S . H A S T E R S T E. GENE AUTRY WAY S .D O U G L A S S R D S . C L E M E N T I N E S T 1 9 2 1 -1931 East Wright Circle D E V N o. 2017-00051 Subject Property APN: 082-261-10 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2017-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2017-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2017-00051) (1921-1931 EAST WRIGHT CIRCLE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve (i) Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919 to permit the establishment of a brewery, to include a tasting room and outdoor patio area and the on and off-premises sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages within an existing industrial building; and (ii) Variance No. 2017-05093 to permit fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code (herein referred to collectively as the "Proposed Project") at 1921-1931 East Wright Circle in the City of Anaheim (the "Premises"), on that certain real property generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.38-acres in size and developed with an existing industrial building. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for “M-U” Mixed Use land uses. The Property is located in the “I” Industrial Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone. Generally, the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") supersede the regulations of the underlying zone, i.e., that of the “I” Industrial. However, the provisions of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) do not apply to parcels that have been, or are proposed to be, developed entirely under the “I” Industrial Zone; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 10, 2017, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith, and the Planning Commission continued the item to the August 7, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 7, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919 and Variance No. 2017-05093, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA - 2 - PC2017-*** Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919, does find and determine the following: 1. The proposed request to permit a brewery and tasting room with on and off-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages located in an existing industrial business complex is an allowable use within the "I" Industrial Zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.10.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.10 (Industrial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "I" Industrial Zone. 2. The proposed request to permit a brewery and tasting room with on- and off-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the Property is currently developed with an industrial building and the proposed use of the Property as a brewery and tasting room is compatible with the residential and industrial uses in the surrounding area, subject to compliance with the conditions of approval contained herein. 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because the Property is currently improved with an industrial building, no expansion to the building is proposed, and sufficient parking will be provided on the property based on the staggered hours of operation and a peak parking demand of 53 spaces for the proposed use. 4. The traffic generated by permitting the brewery and tasting room with on- and off- premises consumption of alcoholic beverages would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the Property are consistent with the permitted businesses within the surrounding industrial business complex. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919, under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval for the use and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim. - 3 - PC2017-*** WHEREAS, based upon information contained in the letter of operation prepared by the applicant, as well as City staff observations at the site, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for Variance No. 2017-05093 to permit less parking spaces than required by the Code should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces. (84 spaces required; 61 on-site spaces proposed) 1. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the all uses on the Property than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such uses under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such uses. Based on operating hours of the uses on site, the proposed parking will be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed brewery and tasting room as the peak hours of operation will not occur at the same time, and the uses will only overlap for a 2 hour non-peak period. The brewery use is classified as an “alcohol manufacturing with accessory on- and off-site consumption” and alcohol manufacturing use requires 21 spaces per code; however, manufacturing hours of operation would cease regularly at 2:00 p.m. and would only require a maximum of 10 spaces to accommodate 5-10 brewing employees during this time. The tasting room hours are requested from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sunday to Thursday, 12:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday; however, the applicant has indicated that peak demand would occur between 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.; therefore, during peak demand for the tasting room would be 53 spaces and would be accommodated by the 61 on-site parking spaces. 2. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the Property because the proposed number of on-site parking spaces is sufficient to accommodate the needs of the brewery and tasting room, which, through information provided by the applicant regarding hours of operation and peak usage, is determined to be adequate to serve the needs of the proposed and existing uses on site; 3. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the proposed number of parking spaces on-site will be sufficient to accommodate the parking demands for uses proposed which have been described to maintain non conflicting peak operating hours; 4. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use because adequate ingress and egress points are provided at the front of the Property and parking is proposed at the rear of the property; and 5. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the proposed use can accommodate all parking demands on site with the available parking as the uses will operating during opposite peak hours and parking is proposed at the rear of the property; and - 4 - PC2017-*** WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919 and Variance No. 2017-05093, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the conditions of approval, as they relate to the uses permitted under Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919 and Variance No. 2017-05093 are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval that relate to the uses permitted under Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919 and Variance No. 2017-05093 may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other ap plicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. - 5 - PC2017-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 7, 2017. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on August 7, 2017, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of August, 2017. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2017-*** - 7 - PC2017-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05093 (DEV2017-00051) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 1 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modi ficat ions, relocations, or abandonments of exist ing water services, backflow equi pment, and fire lines, shall be coo rdinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of t he Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 2 The building shall be equipped with an alarm system (silent or audible). Police Department 3 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678 Police Department 4 Final landscape plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director or his/her designee. Landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the business. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services 5 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. Police Department OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 6 That ongoing during project operations, vehicle deliveries including loading and unloading shall be performed on site. Delivery vehicles shall not block any part of the public right of way. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 7 Building plans shall show conformance with the current version of Engineering Standard Detail 470 pertaining to parking standards. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 8 The business shall not be operated in such a way as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. Police Department 9 Any and all security officers provided shall comply with all State and Police Department - 8 - PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Local ordinances regulating their services, including, without limitation, Chapter 11 .5 of Division 3 of the California Business and Profession Code. (Section 4.16.070 Anaheim Municipal Code) 10 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department. Such measures shall deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. Police Department 11 Managers, owners, and wait staff need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training. The contact number is 714- 558-4101. Police Department 12 There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. Police Department 13 Signs shall be posted inside all patio doors stating "No alcoholic beverages allowed past this point." Police Department 14 Door(s) shall be kept closed at all times during the operation of the premises except in cases of emergency. Police Department 15 The tasting room shall close at 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on Friday and Saturday. Alcohol sales shall cease 30 minutes prior to the closing of the tasting room. Police Department 16 The outdoor patio area shall close at 9:00 p.m. daily. Police Department 17 Subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premise (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the Business and Professions Code. Police Department 18 There shall be no entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted on the premise at any time unless the proper permits have been obtained from the City of Anaheim. Police Department 19 The brewery shall be operated in accordance with the Statement of Operations submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation as described in that document shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Request and to ensure compatibility Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 9 - PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT with the surrounding uses. INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX 20 The owner of the Property shall be responsible for maintaining the Property in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings making up the subject Property shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 21 The property owner/tenant shall provide adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings. Lighting shall be of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. Police Department 22 No required parking area shall be fenced-off or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage uses. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division GENERAL 23 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 10 - PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 24 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 25 The subject Property shall be developed, used and maintained substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division BREWHEIM BREWING CO. 1931 E. Wright Circle, Anaheim, CA 92806 www.brewheim.com Page | 1 Wednesday, July 26, 2017 Brewheim Letter of Operations Planned Operations Description The intended operation for Brewheim Brewing Company is a production brewery intentionally designed for off-site sales and distribution. The intended purpose for Brewheim is to be a company that represents the diversity and culture of Anaheim and provide a spot for interaction and friendship via the tasting room and patio. Listed are details pertinent to the operation of the brewhouse. ● The building is 22,945 square feet where 13,526 square feet will be dedicated to manufacturing. Currently, the building is shared with one more tenant. Starting August 2018, Brewheim will take over the adjacent tenant’s space. This will add 6,344 square foot for final product cold storage and dry storage. The tasting room is allocated at 2,120 square feet adjacent to an exterior patio of 1,000 square feet. ○ Note: Across all reports and impact studies, the base assumption is taking the entire building area into consideration. ● Planned hours of operation. ○ Production: ■ Monday – Friday: 6 AM to 2 PM ○ Tasting Room: ■ Sunday – Thursday: 12 PM – 10 PM ■ Friday – Saturday: 12 PM – 12 AM ■ Daily: Outdoor patio will be closed at 9 PM. ● Building Improvements ○ Production brewhouse that will be have the capability of producing 930 gallons of beer (wort) every four hours. ○ Process start from steeping grain with hot water in the main production floor via a brewhouse vessel called a Mash & Lauter Tun. It them gets boiled using steam as a heat source on another brewery vessel called a kettle. The wort is then transferred to fermentation vessels that are sized at 1860 gallons (double batch) and 2,790 gallons (triple batch). ○ Utilities needed to support this process are a steam boiler, water filtration, process glycol chiller, CO2, compressed air, and adequate drainage. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 BREWHEIM BREWING CO. 1931 E. Wright Circle, Anaheim, CA 92806 www.brewheim.com Page | 2 ○ First year production goal is set at 2,000 BBL/yr or 62,000 gallons by way of the tasting room and local distribution. ○ Fifth year production goal is is at 19,000 BBL/yr or 589,000 gallons mostly through distribution channels by way of cans, kegs, and small bottle releases. ○ The square footage of the building will support fifth year production numbers prior to needing additional square footage to support production expansion by taking down additional real estate. ● Personnel Management ○ Brewheim will proudly hire local talent to further the company’s identity and roots in Anaheim. ○ Employee Utilization: ■ Production: ● Monday – Friday: 6 AM to 2 PM ○ Maximum 10 production and management staff. ■ Tasting Room ● Monday – Thursday: 12 PM – 10 PM ○ Maximum 10 tasting room and management staff ● Friday – Saturday: 12 PM – 12 AM ○ Maximum 10 tasting room and management staff ● Sunday: 12 PM – 10 PM ○ Maximum 10 tasting room and management staff ○ Note: Personnel loading will vary due to peak hours and demand of each function. ■ Production ● Peak production hours are from 8 AM to 1 PM ■ Tasting Room ● Peak production hours are from 4 PM to 9 PM ● Community Involvement ○ Brewheim has been in open communication with residents immediately adjacent to the Brewery ■ Based on the concerns July 10th hearing date and the July 20th resident meeting hosted on-site at Brewheim, the following concerns have been addressed with the following design modifications. ● Reduced the Patio from 1,676 square feet to 1,000 square feet. BREWHEIM BREWING CO. 1931 E. Wright Circle, Anaheim, CA 92806 www.brewheim.com Page | 3 ● Installing a landscaped Green screen in the exterior to address privacy and noise concerns. ● Adding a Patio cover adequate to assist with noise mitigation. ● Low lighting and indirect lighting are be specified for outdoor lighting needs to address neighbors’ concerns of light pollution. ● All parking and food trucks will be placed at the rear of the building. ● Utilities to food trucks will be provided so the trucks will not be running their engines. ● Reduced the interior tasting room size to meet the parking requirements for tasting room use. ● Hours of operation are reduced to 10 PM Sunday through Thursday back from the original 12 AM originally requested. ● Patio will be closed at 9 PM. Original request was to close the patio when the tasting room closes. ○ As soon as the production brewery is open and the tasting room is available, Brewheim will be an active participant on Anaheim community non-profit and public events. ○ The tasting room will be designed to be pet and family friendly. ○ The tasting room will be an immediate venue for private gatherings. ○ The brand identity identifies itself to being an all-inclusive, socially welcoming environment. -Page 1- PARKING JUSTIFICATION LETTER Revised 12/2015 Why do I need a parking variance? The Anaheim Municipal code includes regulations on the minimum number of parking spaces required to serve various types of uses or businesses. For example, a typical office building is required to have 4 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. By contrast, a medical office building is required to have 6 parking spaces for the same 1,000 square feet of floor area. These requirements are based on industry standards. A parking variance is required when the number of parking spaces on a property does not meet the number of parking spaces required by the municipal code. For example, if an industrial building that was originally intended to be used for warehouse with few employees is converted to a church with large congregation, but has peak hours opposite of the surrounding industrial uses, a variance can take these circumstances into account. Date: 7/26/2017 To: City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 From: Brewheim Brewing Company 1931 E Wright Circle Anaheim CA 92086 RE: PARKING JUSTIFCATION LETTER FOR: BREWHEIM BREWING COMPANY LOCATED AT 1931 E WRIGHT CIRCLE ANAHEIM CA 92086 Introduction The purpose of this parking justification letter is to determine the parking demand for a Production Brewery. The City of Anaheim Municipal Code’s parking requirement for the proposed use is 84 stalls based on the attached parking tabulation for the entire property. The property has 61 stalls available. Operational Characteristics The project consists of a Production Brewery by day (6 AM to 2 PM) and a tasting room in the afternoon/ evening (12 PM to 10 PM with 12 AM closures Fridays and Saturdays). The building is in an industrial zone with close proximity to residential units and entertainment venues within the Platinum Triangle. ATTACHMENT NO. 3A Other characteristics of the project include: Characteristic Description Total Building Square Footage: 22,945 Total Building Square Footage to be used: 16,601 No. of Chairs: (restaurants/ churches/schools only) NA No. of staff and/or students: 10 Max no. of people at the facility at one time 10 Days of Operation: Manuf: Monday – Friday. Tasting Room: Monday - Sunday Hours of Operation: Manuf: 6 AM to 2 PM. Tasting Room: 10 AM to 12 AM (close 10 AM Monday – Thursday). Patio to be closed at 9 PM every day. Peak Hours of Operation: Manuf: 8 AM to 1 PM Tasting Room: 4 pm to 9 pm Off-site Parking Permit/ Agreement? ☒ No o Yes, see attachment Proposed Parking Demand at Project Site Counts of proposed parking utilization based on the required parking counts used by each functional area. Note: Manufacturing hours are from 6 Am to 2 Pm Monday through Friday. The tasting room opens from 12 noon to 10 pm (or midnight Friday and Saturday). For very few hours, uses for both tasting room and manufacturing rarely overlap. When they do overlap, either use would be during non-peak hours. Other Circumstances Other circumstances exist at the project site and/or the proposed use that further reduces the parking demand and includes: Circumstance Available? Description Site Served by Public Transportation? Yes Bus Stop State College – Howell 0.12 Miles away & Katella – State College 0.16 Miles away. Anaheim Resort Transport (ART) network stop 0.16 miles away. Carpool/Vanpool Program Available to Employees? Bike Racks Available at the Project site? Yes Bike Racks will be provided on-site Other Circumstances? Yes § Shuttle Service: Brewheim is within a block of the Anaheim Resort Transportation Network (ART) stop, which handles shuttle service between tourist attraction venues, destination and tourism support facilities such as hotels and entertainment venues. § Pedestrian Traffic • High density of existing and planned residential within walking distance. • Walking distances from large parking facilities such as the stadium. § Ride Share: Another trend is the pervasive use of ride share programs such as Uber or Lyft. § Public Transportation: The Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) provides three bus stops on the corner of Katella and College and two bus stops between Katella and Auburn Way, which are all one block away from the brewery. Analysis Due to the disproportionate under-utilization of personnel loading needed to operate a production brewery during manufacturing hours of 6 AM to 2 PM, the actual parking situation lends to a surplus of available parking spaces to accommodate the secondary function of the brewery, which is the tasting room. Since the tasting room operates mostly when the production area is closed, this opens almost every parking stall for the public to utilize. Per strict compliance for parking the building is required to have a total of 84 parking spots. • 13,526 Square feet of manufacturing, at 1.55 parking spots per 1,000 square feet requires 21 parking spots. • Adjacent tenant occupies 6,344 Square Feet of Warehouse Space. At 1.55 parking spots per 1,000 square feet, this requires 10 parking spots. • At maximum, 10 employees are needed to support brewing operations during the hours of 6 AM to 2 PM. • No guests or day traffic is anticipated other than normal operations such as delivery services and business-related site visits as production brewing operations is closed to the public. • Most of the space used in a production brewery is the storage of raw materials, finished product, and fermentation space which requires little personnel resources to manage. • Daily, starting at noon, the tasting room will be open to the public. There will be an overlap of two hours where production and tasting room will be operating at the same time. o Tasting room traffic and personnel resources will be light between noon to 2 pm. This kind of traffic is what is experienced by similar production brewery tasting rooms in the area such as Noble Ale Works, Bottle Logic, Bruery, etc. o The total allocation for tasting room is set at 53 parking stalls (2,120 sqft at 17 stalls per 1,000 sqft plus 1,000 square feet of patio space.) Certification I certify that the above information and statements contained herein, are in all respects true and correct. Respectfully, Signature: Date: 7/24/2017 PARKING TABULATION Address Business Name Use Unit Size (sq. ft.) Parking Ratio (spaces/1,000 sq. ft) Parking Required 1931 E Wright Circle Brewheim Brewing Co. Manufacturing 13,526 1.55 21 1931 E Wright Circle Brewheim Brewing Co. Tasting Room 3,120 17 36 1931 E Wright Circle Brewheim Brewing Co. Outdoor Patio 1,000 17 17 1921 E Wright Circle Best Moving Co. Warehouse 6,344 1.55 10 BREWHEIM BREWING CO. 1931 E. Wright Circle, Anaheim, CA 92806 www.brewheim.com Wednesday, July 26, 2017 Brewheim Brewing Company 1931 E Wright Street Anaheim CA 92806 Subject: CUP2017-05919: Brewheim – 1931 E. Wright Circle Parking Justification Memo This memo summarizes the parking justification for the proposed occupancy of 22,945 square- feet (SF) of a currently vacant warehouse space. Project Location and Description 1931 and 1921 East Wright Circle is one contingent, stand-alone tilt-up building designed to house two separate warehouse tenants. For the purposes of this report, the building will be referred to as 1931 E. Wright Circle as Brewheim Brewing Company will be the sole tenant. The intended operation for Brewheim Brewing Company (Brewheim) is a small Craft Beer Manufacturing Facility or Type 23 facility per the California State Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) Board. Since a tasting room is a permitted accessory component to production, Brewheim will install a tasting room on site. As currently proposed, the building will then be developed to accommodate 13,526 SF of Brewery Manufacturing, 6,344 SF of Warehousing of Raw Materials and Finished Production, and 2,120 SF of Tasting Room. Additionally, a 1,000 SF patio is planned to sit adjacent to the Tasting Room. No food or kitchen facilities will be built within the premises. ATTACHMENT NO. 3B BREWHEIM BREWING CO. 1931 E. Wright Circle, Anaheim, CA 92806 www.brewheim.com Parking Calculations Required Parking Brewery SQFT Parking Counts per 1,000 SQFT Required Parking Tasting Room 1,125 17 19 Bar 322 17 5 Storage/ Event space 673 17 11 Manufacturing 13,526 1.55 21 Warehouse 6,344 1.55 10 Accessory Areas 955 0 - Total Interior 22,945 67 Patio Total 1,000 17 17 Total Needed 84 Standard Stalls 61 Spaces 73% of Required Parking Plan Description of Use Manufacturing Use (6 AM to 2 PM) 30.80 Spaces Tasting Room Use (12 PM to 12 AM) 53.04 Spaces BREWHEIM BREWING CO. 1931 E. Wright Circle, Anaheim, CA 92806 www.brewheim.com Production Brewing and Tasting Room Parking & Justification The demand for daytime brewing operations is minimal. • Typical hours for brewers start at 6 AM and complete at 2 PM (Brewer’s shift). o Brewing operations will require 5 employees and may ramp up to 10 employees after several years of operations. • Typical hours for tasting room start at 12 PM and end at 10 PM from Sunday through Thursday and 12 PM to 12 AM Fridays and Saturdays, which will be covered in two separate shifts. o Tasting room personnel will consist of an employee density between 5 to 10 personnel to support heavy operations. o Tasting room peak hours of operations range from 4 pm to 9 pm. Per strict compliance for parking the building is required to have a total of 84 parking spots. • 13,526 Square feet of manufacturing, at 1.55 parking spots per 1,000 square feet requires 21 parking spots. • Adjacent tenant occupies 6,344 Square Feet of Warehouse Space. At 1.55 parking spots per 1,000 square feet, this requires 10 parking spots. • At maximum, 10 employees are needed to support brewing operations during the hours of 6 AM to 2 PM. • No guests or day traffic is anticipated other than normal operations such as delivery services and business-related site visits as production brewing operations is closed to the public. • Most of the space used in a production brewery is the storage of raw materials, finished product, and fermentation space which requires little personnel resources to manage. • Daily, starting at noon, the tasting room will be open to the public. There will be an overlap of two hours where production and tasting room will be operating at the same time. o Tasting room traffic and personnel resources will be light between noon to 2 pm. This kind of traffic is what similar production brewery tasting rooms experience in the surrounding area such as Noble Ale Works, Bottle Logic, and Bruery. BREWHEIM BREWING CO. 1931 E. Wright Circle, Anaheim, CA 92806 www.brewheim.com o The total allocation for tasting room is set at 53 parking stalls (2,120 sqft at 17 stalls per 1,000 sqft plus 1,000 square feet of patio space.) o Other factors to take into consideration that will alleviate the parking situation are the following: § Shuttle Service: Brewheim is within a block of the Anaheim Resort Transportation Network (ART) stop, which handles shuttle service between tourist attraction venues, destination and tourism support facilities such as hotels and entertainment venues. § Pedestrian Traffic • High density of existing and planned residential within walking distance. • Walking distances from large parking facilities such as the stadium. § Ride Share: Another trend is the pervasive use of ride share programs such as Uber or Lyft. § Public Transportation: The Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) provides three bus stops on the corner of Katella and College and two bus stops between Katella and Auburn Way, which are all one block away from the brewery. Conclusion Due to the disproportionate under-utilization of personnel loading needed to operate a production brewery during manufacturing hours of 6 AM to 2 PM, the actual parking situation lends to a surplus of available parking spaces to accommodate the secondary function of the brewery, which is the tasting room. Since the tasting room operates mostly when the production area is closed, this opens every parking stall on-site for the public to utilize. City of Anaheim INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE To: Lindsay Ortega/Planning Department Case No.: DEV 201 7-000511CUP 2017-05919 Brewheim Date: From: 1921-1931 E. Wright Cr. June 6, 2017 Lieutenant Brian McElhaney Anaheim Police Department Vice , Narcotics and Criminal Intelligence Section Commander Contact: Name: S.P.S.R. Michele Irwin Phone : 714-765 -1461 Email: mmirwin @ anaheim.net The Police Department has reviewed the above case. Please see the following comments and conditions for more information: COMMENTS: The Police Department has received an I.D .C . Route Sheet for DEV 2017 -000 51/CUP 2017-05919 . The applicant is requesting to permit a new brewery with outdoor patio . This location is within Census Tract Number 863.03 which has a population of 6,212 . This population allows for 7 on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there are presently 22 licenses in the tract. It also allows for 3 off-sale licenses and there are presently 5 licenses in the tract. This location is within Reporting District 2027 which is below the city average in crime. There have been no calls for service to this location in the last year. The y.; mile radius surrounding this location is also below the city average in crime . The calls for service primarily consisted of: 8 grand theft autos , 15 petty thefts, 8 auto burglaries and 9 commercial burglaries . RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. 2. The Police Department requests the following conditions be placed on the Conditional Use Permit: Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the Police Department licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. The business shall not be operated in such a way as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or Police Department welfare. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 3. Any and all security officers provided shall comply with all State and Local ordinances regulating their Police Department services, including, without limitation, Chapter 11 .5 of Division 3 of the California Business and Profession Code. (Section 4 .16.070 Anaheim Municipal Code) 4. Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department. Police Department Such measures shall deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. 5. Managers, owners, and wait staff need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and Police Department obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training. The contact number is 714-558-4101 . 6. There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. Police Department 7. Signs shall be posted inside all patio doors stating "No alcoholic beverages allowed past this Police Department point. " 8. Door(s) shall be kept closed at all times during the operation ofthe premises except in cases of Police Department emergency. 9. Hours of operation shall be limited to 12 midnight for the tasting room and 9:00 p.m. for the outside Police Department patio area. 10 . That subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premise (bar) type Police Department license nor shall the establishment be operated as a publ i c premise as defined in Section 23039 of the Business and Professions Code . II. There shall be no entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted on the premise at any time Police Department unl ess the proper permits have been obtained from the City of Anaheim . Co ncu r: --ft.4---:f::FP"':'!:"r----,--- M~ DLM ;k', C. f:\home\mmirwin\CUP\2017-D0051 DE V 1921-31 E Wright Cr Brewheim .doc PROJECT ORIGINAL DATE:REVISIONS:NO.DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE:STAMP:SHEET NUMBER: A L L I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S A N D P L A N S I N D I C A T E D O R R E P R E S E N T E D B Y T H E D R A W I N G A R E O W N E D B Y A N D T H E P R O P E R T Y O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E , A N D W E R E C R E A T E D , E V O L V E D A N D D E V E L O P E D F O R U S E O N A N D I N C O N N E C T I O N W I T H T H E S P E C I F I E D P R O J E C T . N O N E O F S U C H I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S O R P L A N S S H A L L B E U S E D B Y O R D I S C L O S E D T O A N Y P E R S O N , F I R M O R C O R P O R A T I O N F O R A N Y P U R P O S E W H A T S O E V E R W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . F I L I N G T H E S E D R A W I N G S O R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S W I T H A N Y P U B L I C A G E N C Y I S N O T P U B L I C A T I O N O F S A M E A N D N O C O P Y I N G , R E P R O D U C T I O N O R U S E T H E R E O F I S P E R M I S S I B L E W I T H O U T T H E C O N S E N T O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . 07-24-17 CUP SUBMITTALHAUCK ARCHITECTURE ronson ct., ste.f, san diego, ca 858.384.7795921114888 p:info@hauckarchitecture.com e:http://www.hauckarchitecture.com 31127 8345 mt lic. #arc-arc-lic-ca lic.#c 2008004390 mo lic.#a-11500 wa lic. #407077 pa lic. #ra---98187 fl lic.#ar -62855 az lic.#-16066 1931 E. WRIGHT CIRCLE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 PROPOSED SITE PLAN - NO VALET A1a 19 2 1 & 1 9 3 1 E . W R I G H T C I R C L E (N ) 1 S T O R Y B R E W E R Y 22 , 9 4 5 S . F . 19 5 1 E . W R I G H T C I R C L E 19 1 0 & 1 9 1 1 E . W R I G H T C I R C L E PR O P O S E D O V E R A L L S I T E P L A N - N O V A L E T SC A L E : 1 " = 2 0 ' - 0 " 0 10 20 N PARKING PROVIDED STANDARD PARKING SPACES = 61 SPACES (72.6% OF REQUIRED) LO A D I N G D O C K NE W 1 , 0 0 0 S . F . P A T I O A R E A AN D N E W L A N D S C A P I N G EX I S T I N G L A N D S C A P E AR E A S T O B E R E W O R K E D PR O P E R T Y L I N E 1 8 3 . 0 5 ' N 7 9 ° 2 3 ' 3 1 " W P R O P E R T Y L I N E 2 8 4 ' S 0 0 ° 1 2 ' 2 3 " E PR O P E R T Y L I N E 2 0 4 . 5 ' N 8 9 ° 4 7 ' 3 7 " E P R O P E R T Y L I N E 7 7 . 6 7 ' N 0 0 ° 1 2 ' 2 3 " W 13 . 8 1 ' D15 ° 4 9 ' 4 6 " R = 5 0 ' P R O P E R T Y L I N E 3 0 . 0 2 ' PRO P E R T Y L I N E 8 7 . 8 9 ' D0° 5 0 ' 5 4 " R = 5 9 2 9 . 5 8 ' 8'- 0 " M I N VA N A C C E S S I B L E EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E B L O C K TR A S H E N C L O S U R E T O R E M A I N EX I S T I N G P O W E R PO L E T O R E M A I N ( 1 3 ) 8 ' - 6 " X 1 8 ' - 0 " P A R K I N G S P A C E S ( 9 ) 8 ' - 6 " X 1 8 ' - 0 " P A R K I N G S P A C E S (2 4 ) 8 ' - 6 " X 1 8 ' - 0 " PA R K I N G S P A C E S SE E A D A P A R K I N G N O T E S T H I S SH E E T F O R M O R E I N F O R M A T I O N 1 8 ' - 0 " M I N . NO T E : T H E S E S P A C E S A R E N O T P A R T OF T H I S P R O J E C T O R P A R C E L A N D AR E N O T T O B E U S E D T O M E E T PA R K I N G R E Q U I R E M E N T S . NO T E : A L L P A R K I N G S T A L L S SH A L L B E D O U B L E S T R I P E D P E R CIT Y O F A N A H E I M E N G I N E E R I N G ST A N D A R D 4 7 0 . N 1 0 ° 3 6 ' 2 9 " E EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E V G U T T E R T O R E M A I N 1 8 ' - 0 " 9'- 0 " LO A D I N G D O C K ( 3 ) 8 ' - 6 " X 1 8 ' - 0 " P A R K I N G S P A C E S EX I S T I N G D R I V E W A Y T O R E M A I N NE W G R A I N S I L O EX I S T I N G ± 6 ' - 0 " W C O N C R E T E WA L K T O R E M A I N EX I S T I N G P O W E R PO L E T O R E M A I N EX I S T I N G E A S E M E N T 6 4 ' - 0 " D E D I C A T E D R I G H T O F W A Y HA T C H E D A R E A I N D I C A T E S R E Q U I R E D S I T E DIS T A N C E A R E A T O B E C L E A R O F A N Y VIS U A L O B S T R U C T I O N 2 4 " I N H E I G H T R50 ' - 0 " DED I C A T E D R I G H T O F W A Y 9 0 ' - 1 0 " R O W T O N E A R E S T S T A L L 25 ' - 0 " 2- W A Y D R I V E A I S L E EX I S T I N G C H A I N L I N K G A T E TO R E M A I N EX I S T I N G C H A I N L I N K G A T E TO R E M A I N EX I S T I N G C M U B L O C K WA L L T O R E M A I N 8'- 6 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 6 " 18 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 6 " 18 ' - 0 " 25 ' - 0 " 2- W A Y D R I V E A I S L E 22 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " EX I S T I N G C H A I N L I N K G A T E TO R E M A I N EX I S T I N G F I R E H Y D R A N T TO R E M A I N EX I S T I N G P O W E R P O L E TO R E M A I N EX I S T I N G D O U B L E D E T E C T O R CO N N E C T I O N EX I S T I N G F I R E S E R V I C E C O N N E C T I O N EX I S T I N G W A T E R M E T E R S T O R E M A I N EX I S T I N G G A S M E T E R EX I S T I N G B A C K FL O W D E V I C E PARKING CALCULATION - PROVIDEDPARKING CALCULATION - REQUIRED ADA PARKING NOTES 1.G.C. TO PROVIDE NEW ADA PARKING SIGN AT ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING LOCATIONS.2.ONE IN EVERY EIGHT ACCESSIBLE SPACES, BUT NOT LESS THAN ONE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE WITH MINIMUM 8 FT. WIDE ACCESS AISLE ON THE PASSENGER SIDE AND DESIGNATED AS VAN ACCESSIBLE PER CODE 1129.3 AND 1129B.4.3.THE WORDS "NO PARKING" IN WHITE AND MIN. 12" HIGH SHALL E PAINTED ON THE GROUND WITHIN THE WIDTH OF THE ACCESS AISLE PER 1129B.3.4.IN EACH ADA PARKING SPACE, G.C. TO PROVIDE A BUMPER OR CURB SHALL BE PROVIDED AND LOCATED TO PREVENT ENCROACHMENT OF CARS OVER THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF WALKWAYS PER 1129.B.3.5.THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ARE NOT COMPELLED TO WHEEL OR WALK BEHIND PARKED CARS OTHER THAN THEIR OWN PER 1129.B.3.6.A SIGN SHALL BE POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE AT EACH ENTRANCE TO OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES OR IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM EACH ACCESSIBLE SPACE STATING "UNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES PARKING IN DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE..." 1 0 ' - 0 " PU B L I C U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 10 ' - 0 " PU B L I C U T I L I T Y EA S E M E N T EX I S T I N G G A S M E T E R 1 0 ' - 0 " PU B L I C U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T 3 . 8 8 ' 31 . 5 ' N 8 9 ° 4 7 ' 3 7 " E S 0 0 ° 1 2 ' 2 3 " E 2 5 ' - 0 " 2 - W A Y D R I V E A I S L E 1 2 ' - 6 " IN G R E S S / E G R E S S EA S E M E N T SID E S E T B A C K 1 0 ' - 0 " (5 ) 2 2 ' - 0 " x 8 ' - 0 " P A R A L L E L S P A C E S EX I S T I N G F I R E S E R V I C E V A L V E SID E S E T B A C K 10 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 6 " IN G R E S S / E G R E S S E A S E M E N T EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E TO R E M A I N 50 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E V G U T T E R T O R E M A I N P R O P E R T Y L I N E 2 6 0 . 7 8 ' N 0 0 ° 1 2 ' 2 3 " W BREWERY TASTING ROOM:1,125 S.F. @ 17/1,000 = 19.125 BAR:322 S.F. @ 17/1,000 = 5.47 BARREL/EVENT:673 @ 17/1,000 = 11.41 PATIO:1,000 S.F. @ 17/1,000 = 17.0 MANUFACTURING:13,526 S.F. @ 1.55/1,000 = 20.96 ADJACENT TENANT :6,344 S.F. @ 1.55/1,000 = 9.83 TOTAL:22,945 S.F.= 83.795 (84)NOTE: ACCESSORY AREAS NOT INCLUDED. (3 ) 9 ' - 0 " X 1 8 ' - 0 " PA R K I N G S P A C E S (1 ) 9 ' - 0 " X 1 8 ' - 0 " AD A S P A C E (3 ) 9 ' - 0 " X 1 8 ' - 0 " PA R K I N G S P A C E S AT T A C H M E N T NO. 5 PROJECT ORIGINAL DATE:REVISIONS:NO.DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE:STAMP:SHEET NUMBER: A L L I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S A N D P L A N S I N D I C A T E D O R R E P R E S E N T E D B Y T H E D R A W I N G A R E O W N E D B Y A N D T H E P R O P E R T Y O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E , A N D W E R E C R E A T E D , E V O L V E D A N D D E V E L O P E D F O R U S E O N A N D I N C O N N E C T I O N W I T H T H E S P E C I F I E D P R O J E C T . N O N E O F S U C H I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S O R P L A N S S H A L L B E U S E D B Y O R D I S C L O S E D T O A N Y P E R S O N , F I R M O R C O R P O R A T I O N F O R A N Y P U R P O S E W H A T S O E V E R W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . F I L I N G T H E S E D R A W I N G S O R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S W I T H A N Y P U B L I C A G E N C Y I S N O T P U B L I C A T I O N O F S A M E A N D N O C O P Y I N G , R E P R O D U C T I O N O R U S E T H E R E O F I S P E R M I S S I B L E W I T H O U T T H E C O N S E N T O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . 07-24-17 CUP SUBMITTALHAUCK ARCHITECTURE ronson ct., ste.f, san diego, ca 858.384.7795921114888 p:info@hauckarchitecture.com e:http://www.hauckarchitecture.com 31127 8345 mt lic. #arc-arc-lic-ca lic.#c 2008004390 mo lic.#a-11500 wa lic. #407077 pa lic. #ra---98187 fl lic.#ar -62855 az lic.#-16066 1931 E. WRIGHT CIRCLE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 FLOOR PLAN -1931 E. WRIGHT CIRCLE A2 FL O O R P L A N - 1 9 3 1 E . W R I G H T C I R C L E SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " 0 2 4 8 N EX I S T I N G ME N TA P R O O M 1, 1 2 5 S . F . EX I S T I N G OF F I C E 1 EX I S T I N G OF F I C E 2 MA N U F A C T U R I N G 13 , 5 2 6 S . F . EX I S T I N G WA R E H O U S E 6, 3 4 4 S . F . PA T I O 1, 0 0 0 S . F . EX I S T I N G HA L L W A Y PROJECT NAME:BREWHEIM BEER MAKERS PROJECT ADDRESS: 1931 E. WRIGHT CI.ANAHEIM, CA 92806 ZONE:BLPD-REDEVLP-SUBD BUILDING AREA:22,945 S.F.LEASE AREA:16,601 S.F.OCCUPANCY: F-2, A-2 CONSTRUCTION TYPE:III-B, SPRINKLEREDPROJECT INFORMATION PARKING CALCULATION - REQUIREDSQUARE FOOTAGE ANALYSIS (1931 E WRIGHT)BREWERY TASTING ROOM:= 3,410 S.F. (16%)MANUFACTURING:= 13,191 S.F.ADJACENT TENANT:= 6,344 S.F.BUILDING TOTAL:= 22,945 S.F.BREWERY PATIO:= 1,676 S.F. EX I S T I N G C U R B EX I S T I N G WO M E N EX I S T I N G RR EX I S T I N G RR EX I S T I N G ST A F F 8'H F E N C E W I T H D E N S E CL I M B I N G V E G E T A T I O N WO O D B E N C H FIR E P I T NE W CE L L A R NE W BR E W H O U S E BO I L E R GR A I N CO L D B O X YE A S T ST A F F R R EX I S T I N G S I D E W A L K TO R E M A I N EX I S T I N G P A R K I N G TO R E M A I N 21 ' - 4 " 19 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 1 0 " 8 9 ' - 6 " HA T C H E D A R E A I N D I C A T E S EX I S T I N G W A R E H O U S E T E N A N T , NO T A P A R T O F B R E W E R Y GR A I N S I L O NE W CE L L A R 2 10 ' - 8 " 1 5 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 5 8 ' - 2 " 6 ' - 6 " 1 4 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 1 0 " 3 1 ' - 4 " 4 5 ' - 0 " 2 8 ' - 3 " OF F I C E RE T A I L A R E A 9 ' - 4 " 4 6 ' - 1 0 " 1 7 ' - 8 " 20 ' - 0 " 82 ' - 0 " 35 ' - 1 " 48 ' - 0 " 9" 18 ' - 2 " 2 2 ' - 7 " 2 5 ' - 5 " 40 ' - 7 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 24 ' - 6 " 2 2 ' - 4 " 6 ' - 0 " 67 ' - 6 " BREWERY TASTING ROOM:1,125 S.F. @ 17/1,000 = 19.125 BAR:322 S.F. @ 17/1,000 = 5.47 BARREL/EVENT:673 @ 17/1,000 = 11.41 PATIO:1,000 S.F. @ 17/1,000 = 17.0 MANUFACTURING:13,526 S.F. @ 1.55/1,000 = 20.96 ADJACENT TENANT :6,344 S.F. @ 1.55/1,000 = 9.83 TOTAL:22,945 S.F.= 83.795 (84)NOTE: ACCESSORY AREAS NOT INCLUDED. CH I L L E R RE T A I L CO L D B O X PR I V A T E EV E N T R O O M 67 3 S . F . BA R 32 2 S . F . 11 ' - 6 " ME N WO M E N 5 ' - 0 " 44 ' - 9 " D.G . P A T I O FO L D I N G D O O R SY S T E M XE R I S C A P I N G XE R I S C A P I N G XE R I S C A P I N G PROJECT ORIGINAL DATE:REVISIONS:NO.DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE:STAMP:SHEET NUMBER: A L L I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S A N D P L A N S I N D I C A T E D O R R E P R E S E N T E D B Y T H E D R A W I N G A R E O W N E D B Y A N D T H E P R O P E R T Y O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E , A N D W E R E C R E A T E D , E V O L V E D A N D D E V E L O P E D F O R U S E O N A N D I N C O N N E C T I O N W I T H T H E S P E C I F I E D P R O J E C T . N O N E O F S U C H I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S O R P L A N S S H A L L B E U S E D B Y O R D I S C L O S E D T O A N Y P E R S O N , F I R M O R C O R P O R A T I O N F O R A N Y P U R P O S E W H A T S O E V E R W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . F I L I N G T H E S E D R A W I N G S O R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S W I T H A N Y P U B L I C A G E N C Y I S N O T P U B L I C A T I O N O F S A M E A N D N O C O P Y I N G , R E P R O D U C T I O N O R U S E T H E R E O F I S P E R M I S S I B L E W I T H O U T T H E C O N S E N T O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . 07-24-17 CUP SUBMITTALHAUCK ARCHITECTURE ronson ct., ste.f, san diego, ca 858.384.7795921114888 p:info@hauckarchitecture.com e:http://www.hauckarchitecture.com 31127 8345 mt lic. #arc-arc-lic-ca lic.#c 2008004390 mo lic.#a-11500 wa lic. #407077 pa lic. #ra---98187 fl lic.#ar -62855 az lic.#-16066 1931 E. WRIGHT CIRCLE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -1931 E. WRIGHT CIRCLE A3 SO U T H ( F R O N T ) E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " 0 2 4 8 NO R T H ( R E A R ) E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " 0 2 4 8 EX I S T I N G T O R E M A I N , N O C H A N G E WE S T ( S I D E ) E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " 0 2 4 8 EX I S T I N G T O R E M A I N , N O C H A N G E EA S T ( S I D E ) E L E V A T I O N SC A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " 0 2 4 8 EX I S T I N G D O W N S P O U T TO R E M A I N EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E WA L L S T O R E M A I N EX I S T I N G R O O F A C C E S S LA D D E R T O R E M A I N EX I S T I N G D O O R S T O RE M A I N EX I S T I N G L O A D I N G R A M P TO R E M A I N EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E WA L L S T O R E M A I N EX I S T I N G D O O R S T O RE M A I N EX I S T I N G D O O R T O RE M A I N EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E WA L L S T O R E M A I N NE W P A T I O F E N C E PE R P L A N NE W G R A I N S I L O PE R P L A N NE W P A T I O F E N C E P E R PL A N NE W G R A I N S I L O P E R PL A N EX I S T I N G D O W N S P O U T TO R E M A I N EX I S T I N G C O N C R E T E WA L L S T O R E M A I N EX I S T I N G D O O R S TO R E M A I N 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 4 ' - 0 " ± 2 4 ' - 0 " ± 2 9 ' - 1 " NE W W A L L O P E N I N G F O R DO O R S P E R P L A N 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " PROJECT ORIGINAL DATE:REVISIONS:NO.DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE:STAMP:SHEET NUMBER: A L L I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S A N D P L A N S I N D I C A T E D O R R E P R E S E N T E D B Y T H E D R A W I N G A R E O W N E D B Y A N D T H E P R O P E R T Y O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E , A N D W E R E C R E A T E D , E V O L V E D A N D D E V E L O P E D F O R U S E O N A N D I N C O N N E C T I O N W I T H T H E S P E C I F I E D P R O J E C T . N O N E O F S U C H I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S O R P L A N S S H A L L B E U S E D B Y O R D I S C L O S E D T O A N Y P E R S O N , F I R M O R C O R P O R A T I O N F O R A N Y P U R P O S E W H A T S O E V E R W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . F I L I N G T H E S E D R A W I N G S O R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S W I T H A N Y P U B L I C A G E N C Y I S N O T P U B L I C A T I O N O F S A M E A N D N O C O P Y I N G , R E P R O D U C T I O N O R U S E T H E R E O F I S P E R M I S S I B L E W I T H O U T T H E C O N S E N T O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . 07-24-17 CUP SUBMITTALHAUCK ARCHITECTURE ronson ct., ste.f, san diego, ca 858.384.7795921114888 p:info@hauckarchitecture.com e:http://www.hauckarchitecture.com 31127 8345 mt lic. #arc-arc-lic-ca lic.#c 2008004390 mo lic.#a-11500 wa lic. #407077 pa lic. #ra---98187 fl lic.#ar -62855 az lic.#-16066 1931 E. WRIGHT CIRCLE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 EXTERIOR RENDERING A4 TA S T I N G R O O M P A T I O PROJECT ORIGINAL DATE:REVISIONS:NO.DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET TITLE:STAMP:SHEET NUMBER: A L L I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S A N D P L A N S I N D I C A T E D O R R E P R E S E N T E D B Y T H E D R A W I N G A R E O W N E D B Y A N D T H E P R O P E R T Y O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E , A N D W E R E C R E A T E D , E V O L V E D A N D D E V E L O P E D F O R U S E O N A N D I N C O N N E C T I O N W I T H T H E S P E C I F I E D P R O J E C T . N O N E O F S U C H I D E A S , D E S I G N S , A R R A N G E M E N T S O R P L A N S S H A L L B E U S E D B Y O R D I S C L O S E D T O A N Y P E R S O N , F I R M O R C O R P O R A T I O N F O R A N Y P U R P O S E W H A T S O E V E R W I T H O U T T H E W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . F I L I N G T H E S E D R A W I N G S O R S P E C I F I C A T I O N S W I T H A N Y P U B L I C A G E N C Y I S N O T P U B L I C A T I O N O F S A M E A N D N O C O P Y I N G , R E P R O D U C T I O N O R U S E T H E R E O F I S P E R M I S S I B L E W I T H O U T T H E C O N S E N T O F H A U C K A R C H I T E C T U R E . 07-24-17 CUP SUBMITTALHAUCK ARCHITECTURE ronson ct., ste.f, san diego, ca 858.384.7795921114888 p:info@hauckarchitecture.com e:http://www.hauckarchitecture.com 31127 8345 mt lic. #arc-arc-lic-ca lic.#c 2008004390 mo lic.#a-11500 wa lic. #407077 pa lic. #ra---98187 fl lic.#ar -62855 az lic.#-16066 1931 E. WRIGHT CIRCLE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 EXTERIOR RENDERING A5 VI E W F R O M N E I G H B O R I N G C O N D O S 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Patrick Hartson <patrickhartson@yahoo.com> Sent:Sunday, July 30, 2017 4:11 PM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:Brewheim Project Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi, I am a resident at the Stadium Lofts next to the proposed site of Brewheim off of State College and Katella. I know there are a few residents that are apposed to the brewery moving in, but my wife and I are in full support. I love the idea! I look at it as a perk of living there! Walking distance to a brewery, yes please! I know there’s some concern about rowdy crowds and everything else that comes along with it, but I’ve frequented Bottle Logic, and I’ve frequented the Bruery in Placentia, and many other breweries, and the environments their couldn’t be further from what these people are fearing. I feel that the nay sayers are fearing a dive bar, but Brewheim isn’t going to be that. We’ll hopefully be welcoming Breheim to the neighborhood real soon! I can’t wait to take my in‐laws there when they fly in next! Patrick Hartson ATTACHMENT NO. 6A 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Michael Espinoza <michael.espinoza@rockwellcollins.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 01, 2017 8:02 AM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:Anaheim Brewheim Project Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Dear Lindsay Ortega, I am writing to you today in regards of the Anaheim Brewheim Project. My Name is Michael Espinoza and I have owned my unit for the past seven years at the Stadium Lofts I want to inform you that I am in full support of this project and I am happy that something will be built that will bring the community together and deter the homeless from setting up camp. I have no issues with the hours of operations since the side that I live on overlooks a 24 hour AM-PM/gas station. In other words, my neighbors and I have no issues with the noise that a brewery would bring because we encounter a high amount of noise from the busy street of Katella, the nomad homeless people wondering Katella at all hours of the night and the traffic that occurs at the gas station/AM-PM. From my experience, breweries have only encourage community growth and city revenue. I'm pretty sure that Brewheim will not attract the wrong type of crowd because they will not run their establishment like a liquor store/dive bar. If there is anything that I can do, please do not hesitate and let me know. Best regards, Michael Espinoza 1 Lindsay Ortega From:David Mejia <dmx0177@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:33 PM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919; Admin Adjustment No. 2017-00406 Ms. Ortega: I am a resident of the Stadium Lofts at 1801 E. Katella Ave. I am writing to support the aforementioned permit of a brewery. I feel this permit will enhance the neighborhood and surrounding areas. I live in the area of the proposed brewery and I am not worried about any conflicts as I'm sure the brewery will be managed properly. I am emailing as I will not be in town to attend the council meeting. Thank you. David Mejia 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Nicholas Gumina <nick.gumina@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, July 20, 2017 7:04 PM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:1921-1931 East wright circle Brewheim Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hello I am writing this email in support of the proposed brewery. I believe having a business open later and more people in the area will lead to a safer neighborhood and less homeless presence. Nick Gumina Stadium lofts resident 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Sunita Townsen-Gumina <sunitagt@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, July 20, 2017 6:59 PM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:Brewheim Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hello, I wanted to voice my support for the Brewheim project at 1921-1931 wright circle. Honestly I think more people are in favor of the project than opposed, they just aren't saying anything because they're okay with it. I know that's where I am, but figured I would send an email in support anyway. The craft beer community in Anaheim is growing and I have thoroughly enjoyed the fruits of their labor. I live in the Stadium Lofts community and regularly visit breweries throughout the city and I am all for adding another one. If I need to provide any more information for my support to be considered please let me know. Thank you, Sunita Townsen-Gumina 714-200-3766 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Anthony Pulsifer <tjpulsifer3@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 02, 2017 10:15 AM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:Support of Brewheim project Hello, Sending a quick note to express my support of the proposed Brewheim project. This would be a nice addition to the community. I have been a home owner at the Stadium Lofts for 8 years now and this project supports the vision of the Platinum Triangle as a whole. It will also do a decent job of keeping the homeless away. Currently, there are homeless people that have set up shop in the back of the 1931 building and this will push them out. Sincerely, Anthony Pulsifer Sent from my iPhone 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Jason Takamatsu <jasontbase-email@yahoo.com> Sent:Friday, July 28, 2017 9:44 AM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:Conditional User Permit No. 2017-05919 and Variance No. 2017-05093 (DEV2017-00051) Concern Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged I have a concern about the increase in traffic that would occur during peak times as people living in the area are returning home. Wright Circle is more of an ALLEY and the limited parking that is available, it does not make sense to have a transit customer based business for the area as opposed to a commercial/warehouse business. People not familiar or ignoring signage are making an ILLEGAL left turn onto State College, even though the sign is Posted Right Turn ONLY, will only increase the possibility of an accident when you add alcohol to the equation. Also our gate for our parking structure is constantly broken with just the Angles Fans illegally parking in our parking structure, and now you are going to allow people who cannot find parking to illegally park and damage our parking structure seven days a week. Thank you ATTACHMENT NO. 6B 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Lindsay Ortega Sent:Wednesday, July 19, 2017 9:26 AM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:Community Meeting - Brewheim Brewing Company Attachments:Community Meeting - Brewheim.pdf Hello All, Thank you so much for participating in the Planning Commission hearing for the Brewheim Brewing Co. Conditional Use Permit request. Given the comments provided and the Planning Commission’s direction, Brewheim Brewing Co would like to invite all of you to their location to discuss potential solutions to the noise and privacy concerns raised. Please join us at Brewheim Brewing Co. located at 1921‐1931 E. Wright Circle on Thursday, July 20th at 5:30 p.m. Please share this with anyone else you think may be interested in attending. We look forward to seeing you there. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you, Lindsay Ortega Contract Planner Planning and Building Department City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard│ Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Office (714) 765-4934 E-mail LOrtega@anaheim.net ATTACHMENT NO. 7 BREWHEIM BREWING COMPANY MEETING Location: 1931 E. Wright Circle TIme: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 5:30 PM Purpose: Open discussion of Brewheim Brewery project. Contact Brewheim: Dan Ward - Co-Founder Dan@Brewheim.com Eric Ferguson - Co-Founder Eric@Brewheim.com Contact City Of Anaheim: Lindsay Ortega - Contract Planner Planning and Building Department City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard│ Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 LOrtega@anaheim.net714-765-4934 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 10, 2017 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2017-00406 DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2017-00136 LOCATION: 1921-1931 East Wright Circle (Brewheim Brewing Company) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The agent is Phillip Schwartze of the PRS Group. The applicant is Brewheim Brewing Company represented by Dan Ward and William Camacho. The property owner is Finn Holdings, LLC. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of the following entitlements: 1) A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to permit a brewery with a 2,379 square foot tasting room and 1,676 square foot outdoor patio within an existing industrial building; 2) An Administrative Adjustment to permit fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code; and, 3) A Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit on and off-premises sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolutions, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05919, Administrative Adjustment No. 2017-00406, and Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2017- 00136. BACKGROUND: This 1.38-acre property is developed with a 22,945 square foot industrial building. The property is located in the Platinum Triangle within the Industrial Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The General Plan designates the property for Mixed Use land uses. Surrounding land uses include a self-storage facility to the north, industrial uses to the east and south, the Stadium Lofts Condominium Community to the southeast across Wright Circle, and the Jefferson Platinum Triangle Apartment Community to the west, which is under construction. ATTACHMENT NO. 9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919, ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2017-00406 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2017-00136 July 10, 2017 Page 2 of 8 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to establish a 16,601 square foot brewery within an existing industrial building. The remaining space in the building would continue to be occupied by a 6,344 square foot existing industrial tenant. The brewery would include a beer storage and manufacturing room; retail area; restrooms; 2,379 square foot tasting room; and a 1,676 square foot outdoor patio. The sale of beer for both on and off-premises consumption would be limited to the product brewed on-site. The proposed tasting room would be located within the building and the outdoor patio area would include seating, a fire pit, and new grain silo. The applicant is not proposing a kitchen or any type of on-site food preparation. Rendering (Outdoor Patio) The requested hours of operation for beer manufacturing would be from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. daily. The hours of operation requested for the tasting room would be from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. daily. However, the applicant has indicated that the typical hours for the tasting room would be from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., with peak operating hours occurring between 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The outdoor patio would close by 9:00 p.m. daily. Brewing operations would involve five employees with the potential to increase to ten after several years of operations. However, even at peak production capabilities, production would require a maximum of eight employees per shift. The tasting room would include 5 to 10 employees. The applicant has indicated that peak operation of the manufacturing and tasting room would not overlap and therefore it would be unlikely that more than 10 employees would be on site at any time. The brewery would utilize the existing on-site parking to accommodate the use; however, due to a deficit in the required parking spaces, the applicant is proposing a free valet service to ensure that the property can accommodate parking for the proposed brewery. A valet booth would be CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919, ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2017-00406 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2017-00136 July 10, 2017 Page 3 of 8 stationed near the entrance to the brewery, easily visible to patrons as they drive up to the brewery. The applicant has indicated that they have not yet determined whether the valet operations will be conducted by an employee or if they will contract with a professional valet company. A draft condition of approval requires that the applicant submit a valet plan for review and approval by the Planning Department and Police Department prior to operation of the tasting room. Site Plan CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919, ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2017-00406 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2017-00136 July 10, 2017 Page 4 of 8 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit and Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this Zoning Code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Property owners within the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone may develop their properties in accordance with the Overlay Zone or the property’s underlying base zone which, in this case, is the Industrial Zone. The property owner is electing to improve and operate the subject property under the Industrial Zone. The Zoning Code permits Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing by right in the Industrial Zone. The Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing use class consists of establishments that produce or manufacture alcoholic beverages of all types. Businesses under this use class may sell alcohol produced or manufactured on the alcoholic beverage manufacturer’s licensed premises for On-Sale or Off-Sale consumption. Typical uses include breweries, distilleries and wineries. Tasting rooms may be included in conjunction with the manufacturing. A CUP is required if the tasting room is over 750 square feet and/or if an outdoor patio that exceeds 1,000 square feet which is why a CUP is being requested in this instance. The proposed brewery includes a 2,379 square foot tasting room and a 1,676 square foot patio. A Type 23 (Small Beer Manufacturer- Brew Pub or Micro-brewery) license, which authorizes a brewery with an accessory tasting room, would be required from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). In addition, State law requires a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) when a property for which an ABC license is requested is located in a police reporting district with a crime rate above the City average, or when there is an over-concentration in the number of licenses within a Census Tract. In this case, a PCN request is needed because the number of existing alcohol sales licenses in this Census Tract exceeds CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919, ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2017-00406 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2017-00136 July 10, 2017 Page 5 of 8 typical limits based on population. The proposed brewery is located within Census Tract No. 863.03, which has a population of 6,212 residents. This population allows for seven on-sale licenses. There are presently 22 licenses within the tract. State law also allows for three off-sale licenses. There are presently five licenses in the tract. The high concentration of licenses in the tract is due to the location of the property within the Platinum Triangle, which is home to a large number of entertainment venues and food and beverage establishments. Although there is a high concentration of alcohol sales licenses in the area, the crime rate within ¼ mile of this property is below the city average. Calls for service within this area primarily consisted of petty theft, grand theft auto, auto burglary, and commercial burglary. These types of crime are not typically considered alcohol-related. The location is within Police Reporting District No. 2027, which has a crime rate that is below the citywide average. There have been no calls for service to this location in the last year. Staff does not anticipate that the addition of the proposed use at this location would contribute to an increase in crime if the business owner operates in a responsible manner and in compliance with the recommended conditions of approval. These conditions include typical Police Department conditions for similar uses, such as requiring that there shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required, ABC LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training for employees, as well as limiting the use of the outdoor patio to 9:00 p.m. to reduce the potential for noise impacts upon adjacent residential uses. The proposed brewery is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan because it would contribute to the vitality of the Platinum Triangle as “a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities. Although not being requested at this time, any future indoor entertainment, including live music, would require approval of a separate Entertainment Permit. Through the permit review process, staff would have the ability to require certain protections to ensure that the music does not disturb any nearby residents. Any outdoor entertainment proposed in the future would be significantly limited and only allowed up to four times a year through the issuance of a Special Event Permit. Similar to an Entertainment Permit, a Special Even Permit could include restrictions to ensure that such entertainment does not disturb surrounding properties. Based on these factors, staff believes that the proposed use would be compatible with the surrounding area and recommends approval of the CUP. Administrative Adjustment: The applicant requests an Administrative Adjustment to permit fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code. Administrative adjustments are waivers of certain development standards as specified within the Zoning Code. Code permits a deviation of 20% or less from code requirements if certain conditions exist. The Planning Director has review authority over Administrative Adjustments, but may refer any application to the Planning Commission for review. Since the Planning Commission must approve the CUP and the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, the Planning Director has referred the Administrative Adjustment to the Commission to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the project and to make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919, ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2017-00406 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2017-00136 July 10, 2017 Page 6 of 8 1) The adjustment is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code; 2) The same or similar result cannot be achieved by using provisions in the Zoning Code that do not require the adjustment; and 3) The adjustment will not produce a result that is out of character or detrimental to the neighborhood. The Zoning Code establishes the parking demand for the project by combining all existing and proposed uses. The Zoning Code requires 99 parking spaces for the property, including the proposed project, as shown in the table below. There are 59 parking spaces available on-site. In order to address the parking deficit, the applicant is proposing to provide free valet parking services, which will be able to accommodate an additional 25 parking spaces, resulting in 84 parking spaces; a deviation of 16% of the Zoning Code requirements. Patrons of the brewery would drop their vehicle off at the front kiosk located near the entrance and a valet driver would park the vehicle in the parking spaces locate near the rear of building. Use Zoning Code Requirement Proposed Floor Area (s.f.) Spaces Required Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing 1.55 spaces/1,000 s.f. May include 10 percent office space 13,191 21 Alcoholic Beverage Tasting Room 17 spaces/1,000 s.f. 2,379 40 Outdoor Seating 17spaces/1,000 s.f. 1,676 28 Other Industrial Tenant 1.5 spaces/1,000 s.f. 6,344 10 TOTAL 99 The alcohol beverage manufacturing use requires 21 spaces per the Zoning Code; however, manufacturing hours of operation would typically cease at 2:00 p.m. and would only require a maximum of 8 spaces to accommodate 8 employees at full manufacturing capacity. The applicant is proposing to operate the tasting room from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m.; however, the applicant has indicated that peak demand would occur between 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Therefore, during peak demand for the tasting room, there would be no demand for parking for the other industrial tenant of the building. Without the industrial tenant and the alcohol beverage manufacturing, the demand for parking would be 68 spaces, which the property could accommodate with its 84 standard and valet parking spaces combined. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919, ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2017-00406 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2017-00136 July 10, 2017 Page 7 of 8 Furthermore, since the project is located within the Platinum Triangle, it is within walking distance to several planned and recently-constructed residential developments. The applicant states that the unique urban environment and the increase in rideshare services such as Uber and Lyft reduces the reliance of customers on vehicles to access the brewery. As a condition of approval, the applicant will be required to financially participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network, which operates the ART (Anaheim Resort Transit) busses. As a result, there may be the opportunity for Brewheim patrons to access the brewery using ART. In addition, there is an existing ART stop at the corner of State College Boulevard and Katella Avenue, which is in close proximity to the proposed brewery. Based on the above information, staff believes that the number of parking spaces proposed would be adequate to accommodate the proposed brewery without impact to the surrounding public streets or properties. Staff is recommending conditions of approval to ensure the successful management of the on-site parking such as the requirement for free valet service, adequate lighting, directional signs to the parking facilities, and participation in the ART transit program. Community Input: Staff received four emails from residents of the nearby Stadium Loft Condominium community, which are included as attachments to this report. The residents cited concerns regarding criminal activity, traffic, noise impacts to the units located closest to the proposed brewery tasting room and outdoor patio, as well as concerns about whether the proposed use is appropriate at the location. Staff has carefully considered the concerns of the residents and conditions of approval were added to the draft resolution to address some of the concerns and minimize any potential negative impacts to the surrounding area. Recommended conditions of approval include:  Hours of operation shall cease at 12 midnight for the tasting room and 9:00 p.m. for the outside patio area.  There shall be no entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted on the premises at any time unless the proper permits have been obtained from the City of Anaheim (the Entertainment Permit and Special Event Permit processes are described in more detail on page 5 above).  Adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. With respect to traffic concerns, the applicant submitted a Trip Generation Memorandum indicating that the proposed use would not result in an excess of 100 vehicle trips. The City’s Traffic Study Guidelines state that a traffic study is required when a project’s trip generation is expected to exceed 100 vehicle trips in the a.m. or p.m. peak hour. In this case, the Trip CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05919, ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2017-00406 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2017-00136 July 10, 2017 Page 8 of 8 Generation Memorandum estimates that the project would generate 60 vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour. The applicant has indicated that peak operations would occur between 6:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. The previous industrial use would have been expected to generate 17 p.m. peak hour trips; therefore, the proposed use would result in an increase of 43 vehicle trips. This estimate is based upon the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition. The proposed project would generate traffic well below the City’s Traffic Study threshold of 100 vehicle trips and therefore, a traffic study is not required. Traffic generated by the proposed project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and would not create a significant traffic impact and is therefore not anticipated to impose undue burden on the local streets and highways. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: The applicant has designed the proposed establishment of the brewery and tasting room primarily for the commercial production of beer for off-site distribution to retail customers and restaurants. The tasting room and outdoor patio account for only a portion of the business which will serve visitors and residents in the Platinum Triangle area. The recommended conditions of approval would ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Because the nature of the use is primarily beer manufacturing with an accessory component of retail sales and beer tasting, staff believes it is compatible with the surrounding industrial uses, and recommends approval of the request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Lindsay Ortega Jonathan E. Borrego Contract Planner, Lilley Planning Group Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit, Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, and Administrative Adjustment Resolution 2. Letter of Operation 3. Conditional Use Permit Justification Letter 4. Parking Mitigation Plan and Administrative Adjustment Justification 5. Parking Plan Exhibit 6. Police Memorandum 7. Complete Plan Set 8. Public Correspondence 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Johnny Garcia <johnjoe51@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, August 04, 2017 8:49 AM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:Brewheim Project Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged To whom it may concern- I just wanted to take the time to provide feedback on this proposed project. I live at the stadium lofts on the first floor and am in total favor of this project. I believe it will increase community interactivity as well as provide a more community feel rather than the office buildings that currently exist. Its location, plans for patio, walls and parking are all perfectly in line with what i believe will limit noise and traffic congestion on our street. I am 100% in favor of this project. Please feel free to email or call if you need any further info from me. -- Thanks, Johnny Garcia (714)507-0631 johnjoe51@gmail.com www.linkedin.com/in/johnnygarcia 1801 E Katella Ave. Unit 1055 Anaheim CA 92805 NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 2 1 Lindsay Ortega From:jt white <jwhite081285@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, August 05, 2017 5:44 PM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:1921-1931 East Wright Circle Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hello Lindsay, I am a tenant at the Anaheim Stadium Lofts next to where the new Brewery would be located. I have attended one of the recent meetings with my girlfriend regarding some of the concerns that some tenants may have. It has been brought to my attention that I should reach out to give my two cents for why I believe we need this Brewery. I see that one of the main issues that was brought up by certain residents would be the parking. I can assure you this will not be an issue, I'm sure you all have done your due diligence in regards to this. Another issue was the fact that a small amount of individuals, seem to believe that the patio should close at 7 pm. I wouldn't be truly honest if I did not point out that this is a tad hypocritical to an extent. My particular building for instance, has a noise/pool area rule that we must evacuate all social areas of the complex by 10 pm, M‐Th and 11 pm on Friday and Saturday. It is to my understanding that it was proposed to have the patio close at 9 pm. This seems to be more than fair, considering our pool closure hours are to remain open an hour, to two hours longer than this of the business at hand. To me this issue is null and void, given the circumstances. Lastly on this issue, I'd like to mention that most of us don't even get home until 7 pm maybe later. So my opinion, if not made clear in the previous paragraphs, is I am definitely for this business going forward. The last argument was made by a certain individual at the meeting that "what if 1000 people showed up one night"...it is clear to me that some people either A) do not want anything out there regardless of what the business is because of fear of change. (Which is to be expected) or B) they have no clue what a Brewery is and continuously refers to this business as a "bar" which is almost a slap in the face to people who enjoy micro brews. Again, this is solely my opinion and my opinion alone. But I want to also let you guys know that you are not alone. There are many of us that want this. We only hope that those who have issues with this, will learn to come around. Not to veer off track a bit, but we do have a strip club in walking distance. This Brewery however will our community good, and hopefully help with the ongoing theft and issues we have been having. Thank you for taking the time to read this over. One of your supporters, Jeremy White Unit 1049 Sent from my iPhone 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Michael Schafer <mschafer1023@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, August 04, 2017 9:00 AM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:Brewheim Project Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hello, Just wanted to put in my two cents about the Brewery being proposed near where I live (stadium lofts). I think it's overall a fabulous idea. I also think they should be able to stay open well past 7:30 pm (to at least 9:30 or 10:00). If our building is allowing the pool and rec center to be open until late, then I think any noise coming from the brewery will pale in comparison to the noise we hear from pool parties. Places like these are the reason many of us choose to live in location like the Stadium Lofts. I think the more restaurants, shops, entertainment we have that are walkable, the more our property values and quality of life will increase. Thank you. Michael Schafer Stadium Loft Resident 1 Lindsay Ortega From:Mari <mperalez@scico.com> Sent:Thursday, August 03, 2017 4:51 PM To:Lindsay Ortega Subject:1921-1931 East Wright Circle Attachments:PT Lofters Brewheim Support.PNG; Parking1.jpg; parking2.jpg; Lighting.jpg Dear Lindsay, As a follow-up to the July 20th Community Meeting, I am writing in my support For Brewheim in the proposed location at 1921-1931 East Wright Circle. I would like to reiterate my stance of a few of the key issues; parking, outside patio, and security. During our conversations, some residents have stated that parking may be an issue as Stadium Lofts' garage does not contain much visitor parking. I have been counting visitor parking spaces available in the garage since the July 20th meeting, and have found that at least 20 visitor spaces are available during the 5-9pm on average. Yesterday was an Angel's game and our HOA meeting, easily the busiest time as not all home owners live in the lofts, and even then, during the 5-9pm hours, there were at least 10-15 spaces available and street parking. I have attached photos. (Reference photo "Parking1" and "Parking2") The outside patio has brought up concerns regarding noise and light. Some have asked that the outside patio be closed earlier than 9PM. Please consider that our pool area and interior courtyards have a closing time of 10PM Monday - Thursday and 11PM on Friday and Saturday. Why should a business that is across the street from the Lofts be held at a higher standard than that of our interior areas? That also doesn't consider the ambient noises of Disney Fireworks, trains, Angel Games and other activities at the stadium, etc. When thinking of the noise levels produced by a small social gathering, it is hard to fathom that they would be louder than the other activities already going on. Especially at 9pm when the fireworks go off and the trains run at the same time. Also, Brewheim stated that they will also be putting up some type of barrier between the outdoor patio and stadium lofts to hinder the noise, to which I believe will be sufficient enough to alleviate the noise concern. In addition to noise, lighting had be a concern of some residents. Brewheim insisted that they will have no direct lighting pointing towards stadium lofts. With no direct light and large trees hindering sight lines to the patio area, lighting should not be an issue. Please note, the street lights outside of the stadium lofts make a large impact. (Reference Photo "Lighting") It is also worth noting, that because that area currently becomes a dark, eerie corner at night, it attracts transients and others wanting to hide what they are doing. I have witnessed many loitering around that part at night and early mornings. NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 2 2 With the security cameras and lighting, I would hope that will help increase the security of our neighborhood as well as give an inviting space for our neighborhood to join together, strengthening the sense of community. Our community is dire need of that casual home away from home where neighbors of the surrounding apartment communities can get together and get to know one another. Neighbors becoming familiar strangers is what heightens security and a sense of community. Given the fast growth of this area, we need to set the sense of community before it gets to populated to do so. Thank you for your time and for considering my feedback. Mari Peralez long time resident of Stadium Lofts PS I have attached an image from our PT Lofter's facebook group (Stadium Loft residence Discussion Page) that references support for the brewery with the discussed changes from the July 10th and July 20th meetings. (Reference image "PT Lofters Brewheim Support") -- Mari Peralez | Designer The Island Company | www.VisitCatalinaIsland.com Irvine Office: 4 Park Plaza, STE 420, Irvine CA 92614 Island Office: 150 Metropole AVE, Avalon, CA 90704 Office: 310.510.2000 ext. 1239 | Mobile: 657.217.7710 mperalez@scico.com 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: AUGUST 7, 2017 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05887 LOCATION: 2620 West Orange Avenue (Iglesia De Dios Israelita Church) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The owner and applicant is Iglesia De Dios Israelita, Inc., represented by Martin Gomez. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to permit and retain an existing church within an office building. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05887. BACKGROUND: The 0.33-acre property is developed with a two story office building. The property is located within the "C-G" General Commercial zone and the General Plan designates the property for Low-Medium Density Residential land uses. Surrounding land uses include Maxwell Elementary School to the north across Orange Avenue, automotive repair to the east, a retail and office building to the south, and single-family residential land uses to the west. The church was established at this location in July 2016, without prior approval of a CUP, nor the building permits needed to legally allow several interior improvements to the building. Shortly thereafter, staff received a complaint from a neighbor and informed the owner of the property and the church operator that a CUP was required to permit a church and that building permits were required for the interior modifications to the office building. In October 2016, the applicant submitted an application for a CUP. Since that time, the City has received multiple noise complaints about the church from the adjacent neighborhood and the Code Enforcement case remains active and open, pending a determination on this application. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05887 August 7, 2017 Page 2 of 6 On July 10, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this CUP request and received testimony from several residents in the adjacent neighborhood. The residents raised concerns relating to privacy, noise, and construction without permits. The Planning Commission continued the hearing to the August 7 meeting to allow the applicant to meet with the neighboring residents and attempt to resolve their concerns. Staff facilitated a meeting between church representatives and residents on July 20, 2017. Several residents attended the meeting and discussed their privacy and noise concerns in detail. The church representatives stated that they understood the concerns and would manage their activities to minimize the potential noise and privacy impacts, as well as continue to work with the City to obtain the necessary building permits. However, there was not a clear agreement reached to address these issues to the satisfaction of both parties. Building Division staff visited the site on July 27, 2017, and recommended that several items relating to proper emergency escape (means of egress) for an assembly use be addressed prior to commencement of any further services. Other items that need to be addressed include electrical repair, permitting the existing commercial kitchen, and permitting all other alterations made to the building. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to permit and retain a 3,664 square foot church with a 1,248 square foot sanctuary located on the second floor of a two-story office building. The applicant also proposes to pave and re-stripe the existing parking lot. The ground floor would continue to be occupied by the chiropractic business, but the massage therapy business would be moving out. As described below, the church intends to relocate the existing sanctuary to the first floor once the suite is vacated. The church offers services on Saturdays at 9:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m., and 7:00 p.m. A bible study is offered at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesdays and Fridays. There is a shared parking agreement with the property to the south, located at 625 South Magnolia Avenue, and the applicant proposes to provide church parking on both properties. The applicant states that the 7:00 p.m. Saturday service is the most well-attended, with approximately 75 persons present. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05887 August 7, 2017 Page 3 of 6 Site Plan Church representatives have indicated that one of the ground floor tenants (massage therapy business) will be moving out in the next 30-60 days, and it is their intent to move the sanctuary to the ground floor to help alleviate some of the potential impacts on neighboring properties. The applicant believes that this could be accomplished within six months. Accordingly, the existing massage therapy tenant would vacate their ground floor suite, and the chiropractic business would remain. The church would construct a sanctuary on the first floor comparable in size to that existing on the second floor. The second floor sanctuary would be leased out to a new tenant, and church offices and Sunday school rooms would occupy the remaining portion of the second floor. The applicant has indicated that all doors would remain closed and the balcony would only be used for access to the restrooms (which have an exterior door only). Parking would not likely increase because the new sanctuary would be similar in size, and no additional services or programs would be conducted. Should a parking impact occur, staff has provided recommended conditions as described below to address any potential parking issues. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05887 August 7, 2017 Page 4 of 6 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Community and Religious Assembly uses are permitted in the General Commercial Zone subject to approval of a conditional use permit to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area. Parking: The 2620 West Orange Avenue and 625 South Magnolia Avenue properties have a combined total of 52 parking spaces provided on site. The Zoning Code does not specify a parking standard for Community and Religious Assembly uses, but allows parking to be determined by a Parking Letter or Parking Study that identifies the actual parking demand of the church. The applicant submitted an analysis of the existing church’s parking demand in conjunction with the adjacent uses in the Letter of Request included with the CUP application. The applicant also conducted on-site parking counts during church services. As shown in the table below, the applicant surveyed the properties and observed 75 percent of the parking spaces occupied. Staff conducted a separate site visit and verified the information provided. Date Service Peak Parking Demand Saturday, June 3 9:00 a.m. 29 Saturday, June 3 2:00 p.m. 38 Saturday, June 3 7:00 p.m. 39 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05887 August 7, 2017 Page 5 of 6 Code Enforcement has not received any complaints from the surrounding residents or business owners regarding overflow parking into the adjacent neighborhoods or commercial centers. Staff received a letter from the adjacent property owner to the south, confirming the shared parking agreement between 625 South Magnolia Avenue and the church property. Based on the parking counts provided by the applicant and those conducted by staff, the non-conflicting service hours with other uses sharing parking, and the lack of parking-related complaints, staff believes that the church would have sufficient parking spaces available and would not impose an undue burden on the adjacent commercial and residential uses. To ensure that there will be no future parking impacts on the surrounding area, staff recommends the following conditions of approval which are included in the attached draft resolution: (i) any increase in parking demand beyond the current parking supply shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, and (ii) a school use or child daycare, other than Wednesday or Saturday Bible studies, shall not be permitted without prior approval of a conditional use permit. Noise and Privacy: The church sanctuary is located on the second floor of an office building located approximately 100 feet from the nearest single family residence to the west; the “Youth Room” is located approximately 80 feet from the nearest residence. The City has received noise complaints dating back to the church’s opening in July 2016, relating to construction activity and worship services. Neighbors have also cited concerns with view intrusion, car horns, door slamming, amplified music, and children outdoors. Following the community meeting held on July 20, 2017, City staff toured the church and neighboring properties to further observe the proximity of the homes, potential view intrusion, and noise buffering opportunities. Staff observed that the views from the second story balcony to the adjacent residential properties were limited and only impacted the property at 602 Kenmore Street. There is a row of large Ficus trees planted along the property line separating the adjacent homes from the church property; however, these trees have been trimmed in a manner that reduces their effectiveness as a privacy screen. Staff believes that allowing the Ficus tree canopies to broaden along this property line would provide sufficient screening of the neighbor’s backyard, thus alleviating the existing privacy issue. Staff also believes that planned relocation of the sanctuary downstairs would further reduce potential noise and privacy impacts. Staff believes that recommended conditions of approval would mitigate noise impacts and ensure that the use operates in a manner compatible with surrounding office, commercial, and residential uses. These conditions include:  Milestones to ensure that permits are obtained for all unpermitted work, change of occupancy, and that the sanctuary is relocated downstairs within eight months;  Requiring that the existing Ficus trees along the west property line be allowed to grow to provide adequate screening between the properties;  Requiring all church doors to remain closed at all times;  Prohibit the use of sound amplification equipment other than small system for the pastor to deliver sermons;  Allow the Planning and Building Director to modify the church operations should an issue arise;  Prohibiting public gathering on the second floor balcony and parking lot; and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05887 August 7, 2017 Page 6 of 6  Requiring a six month compliance review (with notice provided to the surrounding neighborhood) to ensure that the church is operating in a responsible manner consistent with all conditions of approval, and that adequate construction progress has been made to relocate the sanctuary to the first floor. As noted above, staff is recommending an eight month period to allow the applicant to complete construction. With these conditions included in the draft resolution, staff believes the church could operate in a manner to minimize any potential noise and privacy impacts on the adjacent residential properties to the west. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the existing church would be compatible with the surrounding land uses. The number of on-site parking spaces are adequate to serve the church and adjacent commercial uses based on the actual parking demand observed for the properties. Conditions of approval have been included to ensure that the church would operate in a compatible manner regarding any potential noise or privacy impacts and that sufficient parking is provided. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of this request, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Letter of Request (Applicant) 3. Letter of Response (Applicant) 4. Letter from Adjacent Property Owner 5. Plans 6. Photos 7. Correspondence R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E C-GAUTOREPAIRSERVICE TMATIE LOU MAXWELLELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOFFICESMAGNOLIAUNIFIEDSCHOOLDISTRICT RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2S.F.R. TMAGNOLIA ACRESAPARTMENTS40 DU RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2S.F.R. RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE TRELIGIOUS USE C-GOFFICESANDCHURCH C-GRETAIL RS-2S.F.R. RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE TSINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCERS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2S.F.R. RS-2S.F.R. RS-2S.F.R. TRELIGIOUSUSE RM-3S.F.R. RS-2S.F.R. RM-3ATRIUM GARDENAPARTMENTS51 DU RM-3STANFORDAPARTMENTS RM-3VILLA CAPRIAPARTMENTS RM-3VILLA CAPRIAPARTMENTSRM-3MAGNOLIA POINTAPARTMENTS S M A G N O L I A A V E W ORA NGE AV E W W EST HAV EN DR S K E N M O R E S T W RU NYON P L W ORA NG E AV E S A R O N S T W K EYS L N S S Y L V A N S T S V E R O N A S T W ROVEN AVE S S Y L V A N S T S K E N M O R E S T S V E R O N A S T W. BALL RD W. LINCOLN AVE W. BRO ADWAY S . D A L E A V E W. ORANGE AVE S . M A G N O L I A A V E S . B R O O K H U R S T S T S . B E A C H B L V D W. LINCOLN AVE S . B E A C H B L V D 2 6 2 0 Wes t Orange Avenue D E V N o. 2016-00104 Subject Property APN: 126-191-22 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16 S M A G N O L I A A V E W ORA NGE AV E W W EST HAV EN DR S K E N M O R E S T W RU NYON P L W ORA NG E AV E S A R O N S T W K EYS L N S S Y L V A N S T S V E R O N A S T W ROVEN AVE S S Y L V A N S T S K E N M O R E S T S V E R O N A S T W. BALL RD W. LINCOLN AVE W. BRO ADWAY S . D A L E A V E W. ORANGE AVE S . M A G N O L I A A V E S . B R O O K H U R S T S T S . B E A C H B L V D W. LINCOLN AVE S . B E A C H B L V D 2 6 2 0 Wes t Orange Avenue D E V N o. 2016-00104 Subject Property APN: 126-191-22 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2017-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2017-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05887 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2016-00104) (2620 WEST ORANGE AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05887 to permit and retain an existing community and religious assembly use (the "Proposed Project") for premises located at that certain real property at 2620 West Orange Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.33-acres in size and is currently developed with a two-story office building. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Low-Medium Density Residential land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was scheduled before the Planning Commission at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 10, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith, and the Planning Commission continued the item to the August 7, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2017-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05887, does find and determine the following: 1. The proposed request to permit and retain a church in an existing office building is an allowable use within the "C-G" General Commercial Zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone. 2. The conditional use permit, subject to compliance with the conditions imposed, will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area because the Property is developed with an office and there are a sufficient amount of parking spaces to accommodate the parking demand for the church. 3. The size and shape of the Property is adequate to allow the full operation of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health, safety and general welfare because the facility is located within an office building with a sufficient number of on-site parking spaces being provided, adequate vehicle circulation is provided on site, and compliance with the conditions of approval contained herein will ensure that the church does not have an adverse impact on the adjacent residential uses. 4. The traffic generated by the use would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets to accommodate the use. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05887 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. - 3 - PC2017-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05887, and further contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05887 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of August 7, 2017. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2017-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on August 7, 2017 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of August, 2017. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2017-*** - 6 - PC2017-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05887 (DEV2016-00104) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 There shall be no sound amplification within the church facility, other than a microphone for the pastor to conduct services. There shall be no drums, and no use of air horns or other similar noise-making devices. All doors shall remain closed at all times to prevent noise impacts to surrounding uses. Should any noise related issues occur as a result of the church operation, the Planning and Building Director may require the church to modify its activities until such time that noise issues have been adequately addressed. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 2 Sufficient parking for all uses located at the subject property and 625 South Magnolia Avenue shall be maintained at all times, so that the uses will not cause any parking impacts to surrounding uses. Should the parking demand exceed the existing parking supply, or otherwise be determined as insufficient, the Planning and Building Director may require a modification to the church operations until such time that parking issues have been adequately addressed. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 3 Bible studies shall occur on Wednesdays and Saturdays only as described in the letter of operation. This facility shall not be used as a private daycare, nursery, elementary, junior and/or senior high school. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 4 The existing Ficus trees along the west property line shall be maintained and allowed to grow to ensure that adequate screening is provided adjacent to the single-family homes on the west side of the subject property. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 5 Before and after church services, church employees shall ensure that attendees do not congregate or use the second story balcony or parking lot for gathering in order to minimize any impacts on the adjacent residential neighborhood. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 6 The facility shall operate in accordance with the Letter of Operation submitted as part of the application; all other areas shall be accessory to the sanctuary and shall not be used concurrently with the sanctuary. Any changes to the facility’s operation described in the Letter of Operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Building Director to determine substantial conformance with said letter and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 7 - PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 7 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the property owner shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning and Building Department, Code Enforcement Division 8 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 9 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 10 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 11 Within 30 days of the date of this resolution, the applicant shall secure the services of a licensed architect or other qualified design professional to prepare plans for all unpermitted work and any other proposed improvements, including the building’s change of occupancy, relocation of the sanctuary to the first floor, and parking lot paving and restriping. The first floor sanctuary shall be comparable in size to the existing second floor sanctuary so as to not create a larger assembly area that could significantly increase the parking demand. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 12 Within 90 days of the date of this resolution, all necessary plans and documentation for unpermitted and proposed improvements, including the relocation and the building’s change of occupancy of the sanctuary to the first floor and the parking lot paving and restriping, shall be submitted for to the Building Division, demonstrating that the church use complies with all applicable requirements of the California Building and Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 8 - PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Fire Codes. A parking lot paving and restriping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. 13 Within 150 days of the date of this resolution, the applicant shall obtain all applicable building permits for unpermitted and proposed improvements, including the building’s change of occupancy and relocation of the sanctuary to the first floor. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 14 Within six months from the date of approval, the project shall be scheduled for Planning Commission review as a noticed Reports and Recommendations item to ensure construction progress and compliance with all conditions of approval. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 15 Within 240 days of the date of this resolution (approximately eight months), the applicant shall have completed all work and obtained all necessary building permit inspections and approvals, including final inspections, and a certificate of occupancy for all work described in the prior conditions of approval. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division Iglesia De Dios Israelita, Inc. 2620 W. Orange Ave, Anaheim, Ca Development Application Letter of Request - 6.5.17 This letter is to inform the City of Anaheim that our church organization is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to conduct religious services at 2620 W. Orange Ave, Anaheim, Ca. We have recently purchased the property and where informed that it was able to conduct services but soon realized that a permit was not in place and the current minor changes that have been done need to be permitted. We have not conducted any further work and would like to get all items permit in the ﬂoor plan as attached. We intend to conduct weekly church services during non business hours. Project Proposal: We would like to get all current items that have been constructed permitted and a CUP to conduct services on the second ﬂoor of the property. We do not intent to expand or add any additional construction simply permit what has been done and get all items up to code. Parking: - Parking stalls will be double striped according to City of Anaheim Engineering Standard 470. - Two ADA parking stalls will be provided and are demonstrated on ﬂoor plan and will comply with Caltrans Standard Plan A90A, accessible parking stall design, striping, and required signage. Floor 1: Unit 2 Massage Service Square Footage: 1,832 sqft Floor 1: Unit 1 Chiropractor Square Footage: 1,832 sqft Floor 1: Total SQFT: 3,664 sqft Floor 2: Church GFA: 1,248 sqft (Sanctuary Floor Area / General Meeting Area) Floor 2: Total Sqft: 3,664 sqft Total Parking required: Church 1 x 30sqft = 42 Massage: 4 Required per room = 4 Chiropractor Ofﬁce: 4 Required per service room = 4 Total Parking Required: 50 Total Parking Provided: 52* - Based on shared parking agreement - Includes 2 ADA Parking spaces Parking Evaluation Done week of 5.15.17 - ALL PARKING AREA AND VEHICLES Wednesday's 7pm-9pm, - Small Bible Study - 24 Vehicles Friday's 7pm-9pm, - Small Bible Study - 25 Vehicles Saturday 9am-2pm - 29 Vehicles 3pm-6pm - 38 Vehicles 7pm-9pm - 39 Vehicles ATTACHMENT NO. 2 Church Operation Details: 1.Operations: Religious Worship Services, Christian teachings based on the bible, women's gatherings, Mens gatherings, children's gatherings and family gatherings. All during the established service times. 2.Hours of Operations: 1.Wednesday's 7pm-9pm, - Small Bible Study 2.Friday's 7pm-9pm, - Small Bible Study 3.Saturday 9am-9pm - 9am-2pm Full Service, 3pm-6pm Full Service & 7pm-9pm Leadership Service 3.Number of employees: 0 - all volunteer, church member base. 4.Tenants: 1.1st Floor Ste #2, Amazing Massage - Operations: 8am to 7pm M-Sun - Everyday 2.1st Floor Ste #1, Daily Health Care Chiropractor: 11am - 5pm M-F - Church does not amplify sound using a large scale professional PA system. - Music is NOT ampliﬁed it is acoustic - Ministry time by the pastor does use a microphone with two small 10' speakers for in room purposes NOT a large scale professional PA system. Community: Neighbors: - Housing located approximately 240ft from proposed sanctuary 625 S Magnolia: - Details of Business Property located next to use in which parking is share: 1. Anaheim Soccer Association: Ofﬁce Hours: 6pm - 8pm Monday to Saturday, Closed Sunday 2. Best Magic Costume Shop: Retail Store Hours: Monday to Friday: 10am - 6:30pm, Saturday 10am - 5pm, Closed Sunday 3. Initial Contract: Embroidery Shop - Ofﬁce Hours: Monday to Friday: 10am - 6pm Times Church Mission Statement: Iglesia De Dios (Israelita), Inc. has been organized to operate exclusively for religious purposes within the scope of Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of the Iglesia de Dios (Israelita) is to spread the moral and religious values according to the Holy Scriptures, as well as its precise interpretation regarding to the Church of God, just as it was originally established. Thank you for your consideration Pastor Martin Gomez, Iglesia De Dios (Israelita), Inc Iglesia De Dios Israelita, Inc. 2620 W. Orange Ave, Anaheim, Ca Development Application - Response Letter July 31, 2017 This letter is in response to CUP development application for Iglesia De Dios Israelita, Inc. Please note all adjustments and proposed modiﬁcations along with how the church is handling and will continue to handle all community and neighbor concerns. City Code & Corrections: - Building and safety concerns are being made and corrected Parking: No additional parking demand with relocation of sanctuary to 1st ﬂoor. - Parking stripping is scheduled to be completed with in 30 days - Parking will be ﬁrst taken at the 625 S Magnolia parking shared stalls to assist with the foot trafﬁc to and from cars for the neighbor's noise concerns. Sanctuary Relocation Area of Usage: Floor 2: Current Church GFA: 1,248 sqft (Sanctuary Floor Area / General Meeting Area) - Second ﬂoor Unit #3 will be leased out to a qualiﬁed commercial tenant for business purposes once relocation has been done of Sanctuary area to 1st Floor - No additional parking demand is expected as current unit #2 will no longer require parking stalls on a weekly basis. - All service times proposed will remain the same but be promptly ended by 8pm and be out of the premises by 9pm, before noise ordnance hours to allow for continued noise control for neighbors. Floor 1: Proposed Unit #2, Church Sanctuary Proposed relocation, total sqft 1,248. - Like to Like Swap - Proposed Sanctuary relocation area to be the same sqft (1,248) and ﬂoor plan as 2nd ﬂoor area. - 6-8 Months relocation time frame for church to be fully operational and in code compliance and permit approvals for 1st Floor sanctuary usage. Actions Taken By The Church to Facilitate Community Concerns: 1. For over 6 months, commencing at the beginning of the citation for noise and permit violation the church has in fact: - Stoped ALL construction and any modiﬁcation and or maintenance of the building per city ruling - Stoped ALL ampliﬁed music, community has acknowledged the noise reduction since doing so. - Planted 8 NEW trees/vegetation that are currently growing and will assist in the privacy concerns of the neighbors ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Actions Taken By The Church to Facilitate Community Concerns: (cont) - Allowing ALL trees to grow fully to - Policies and Procedures have been put in placed and been administered by the church leadership to assist in foot trafﬁc, safety and noise concerns of the neighbors - Adjusted Sunday gardening and premises cleaning hours to not begin any work on premises before 10am - Adjusted ALL service times to end promptly by 8pm and be out of the premises by 9pm, before noise ordnance hours to allow for continued noise control for neighbors. - 625 S Magnolia: - Buiness owners and property owners have agrreed to the continue support of our church and parking needs. Church Mission Statement: Iglesia De Dios (Israelita), Inc. has been organized to operate exclusively for religious purposes within the scope of Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of the Iglesia de Dios (Israelita) is to spread the moral and religious values according to the Holy Scriptures, as well as its precise interpretation regarding to the Church of God, just as it was originally established. Thank you for your assistance & consideration Pastor Martin Gomez, Iglesia De Dios (Israelita), Inc ATTACHMENT NO. 4 scale 1"=30' 2620 W Orange Ave, Anaheim California 92804 In S M a g n o l i a A v e 113'-5"125'39 ' - 3 " R25 ' 10 9 ' - 1 1 " 77 ' 263'-5" 94 ' - 9 " 11 7 ' - 2 " 10 ' - 3 " 47 ' 6' - 6 " 41'-11" 11 0 ' - 8 " 15'-8"26'-3" 55'-6" 7' - 1 0 "14 ' - 1 " 48' 71'-7" 9 ' - 6 " 5' 9' - 6 " 5' 150' 14 Parking Spaces 10 P a r k i n g S p a c e s 12 P a r k i n g S p a c e s (1 A D A P a r k i n g S p a c e ) Two Story Building (1 A D A P a r k i n g S p a c e ) 18' 8' - 6 " 24' Property Line Property Line Property Line Access Orange Ave Out In 12 P a r k i n g S p a c e s 40'-3" 4 3 ' - 5 " 3 0 ' - 6 " 203'-6" 37 ' - 8 " 44'-9" 23 ' - 5 " 59'-6"27 ' - 5 " 28 ' - 9 " 37'-6"59'-9" 5'-6" 5' 12'-2"76'-7" 3,664 Sf Each Floor 7,328 Sf Total 24' 1 7 ' - 1 " 2' 60' ATTACHMENT NO. 5 Ch u r c h G F A A r e a : Sa n c t u a r y : 1 , 2 4 8 s q f t * *f l o o r a r e a o f s a n c t u a r y / g e n e r a l m e e t i n g s p a c e Di n n i n g R o o m : 5 4 8 s q f t Yo u t h R o o m : 2 2 3 s q f t Of f i c e : 1 0 1 s q f t Ki d s R o o m # 1 : 1 0 1 s q f t Ki d s R o o m # 2 : 1 1 2 s q f t Ki t c h e n : 2 7 2 s q f t La d i e s R o o m : 1 3 0 s q f t Me n s R o o m : 2 6 0 s q f t To t a l F l o o r 2 S q f t : 3 , 6 6 4 s q f t Un i t 1 C h i r o p r a c t o r G F A S q u a r e F o o t a g e : 5 7 4 s q f Un i t 2 M a s s a g e S e r v i c e G F A S q u a r e F o o t a g e : 5 2 8 s q f ATTACHMENT NO. 6 1 Elly Morris From:Laura Dent <coolscience@me.com> Sent:Thursday, July 20, 2017 1:19 PM To:Nicholas J. Taylor Subject:Noise Nuisance - Medical building 2620 Orange Ave. Dear Nick, I have looked at the Anaheim building codes and I have several concerns about the Medical Building at 2620 Orange Ave. There is the constant noise of large groups of people arriving and leaving, sermons, speaking in tongues and singing on some week days and nights, Friday night and all morning and night Saturday. There is amplified music played (rehearsal ?) on other days and the pastor leads clean up crews and noisy gardeners and does heavy construction on other days of the week. Of course churches are good for people and the community. I love our neighborhood and our neighbors, nearby residences, businesses and churches. I am catholic and many of our neighbors are religious. I know we have two lovely churches on the corner across the street that do a lot of good work for the community. St Paul’s Presbyterian Church and Magnolia Baptist Church and we have several other churches in close proximity. The problem is that this building was built and planned as a two story medical building with offices and parking spaces for that function. It was not designed as a church. The people in our neighborhood expect this business building to have daytime operating hours and a quiet daily business atmosphere. This is what we expected when we moved into our homes and it is unfair to force us to live with this loss of peace and quiet. Instead we have a constant noise nuisance and people looking into our yards and homes taking away our privacy. The new owners have altered the second floor with out permits and are doing non licensed work. We have been complaining to the “church”, the city of Anaheim and the police about this for more than a year. They have remodeled the medical offices into an assembly hall. Have they already remodeled a kitchen? The building is very close to residences. It is less than 100 feet to the closest dwelling and was not built to be a church. , There is relatively no sound barrier between the second floor of this building and the surrounding neighborhood other than than a few trees. Isn’t this in violation of Anaheim building code which requires religious assembly to take place on the ground floor of buildings and be 200 feet away from residences? Major and ongoing construction is done at late and early hours of the night and day by the pastor of the church and other members. Interior walls appear to have been torn down and built up using electric saws, hammers and electric sanders. Doors, windows and restrooms have been installed noisily without permits. Have the American with disabilities Act accommodations been taken into consideration with these remodels? Have fire safety provisions in accordance for a large assembly of people been installed? There is a single narrow staircase. Are there fire sprinklers? The children are allowed to play in the parking lot as if it were a playground are they being properly supervised?. This building and place is not appropriate for a church. Remodeling the inside into an assembly hall by moving walls does not make it so. ATTACHMENT NO. 7 2 Code Violations- I have looked at the Anaheim building code documents and it appears the “church” is doing or have done things that are in violation of building code, environmental impact rules and Anaheim planning codes. 1. Construction code violations. 2. Regulations of amplified sound violations. 3. Environmental impacts. EIR 4. Building code for church operating on ground floor. 5. Parking and tree planting codes. 1. Construction without a permit. According to the meeting with the planning committee no permits have been requested or granted but construction and our complaints about construction noise have been going on for more than a year. From Anaheim building permit document- https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/730 Before a structure in the City of Anaheim can be built, constructed, enlarged, altered,repaired, moved, improved, removed, converted or demolished, a permit for that work is required. This includes single-family homes, multi-unit residential buildings and commercial buildings. It also includes, but not limited to, signs, fences, patio covers,pools, hot tubs and ponds. Please refer to the 2013 California Building Code, Section105 for additional information. Some examples of construction activity that require a permit include: • Construction of new Buildings • Construction of Tenant Improvements ******• Additions and remodels = added restroom or remodeled door to restroom • Installation of signs • Upgrade or replace electric service panels • Add, replace or move outlets, lights, switches or other electrical equipment • Add, replace or move registers, ducts or mechanical equipment- I am not sure if this was done. • Add, replace or move plumbing lines or plumbing fixtures • ***• Demolition- I have heard a lot of this • Patio Covers, Enclosures and Decks • Pools and Spas • Retaining walls supporting a surcharge • Block walls over 7’high • ***• Accessory structures - dry wall installation ****• Re-roofs - working on roof • Re-pipes • Water heater and water softener change-outs *****• Window and door change-outs - changed out windows and doors ******• Drywall replacement- stack of drywall *******• Repairs of damaged areas *******• Stucco and siding- redone with windows 3 This list gives examples of some of the type of work that require permits. There are other work types that may require permits that are not on this list. If you are unsure if your project requires a permit, please call the Building Division at (714) 765-5153 + 0 to assist you in making a determination. 2. Noise of all kinds at all hours of the day and night. Numerous noise complaints have been sent from our neighbors to the church, the police and the planning office for more than a year. Anaheim building codes http://library.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/?f=templates&fn=default.htm 6.72.020 REGULATION OF AMPLIFIED SOUND. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter 6.70 of this code, it shall be unlawful for any person to use or operate, or cause to be used or operated, within the City of Anaheim any sound-amplifying equipment in a fixed or movable position, or mounted upon any vehicle, except when used or operated in compliance with the following provisions: .010 In all residential zones and within two hundred feet of any boundary thereof, no sound-amplifying equipment shall be operated or used for commercial purposes, except sound-amplifying equipment may be used for commercial purposes upon a moving vehicle between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. to announce the presence of such vehicle in an area or location for commercial purposes; provided that such sound-amplifying equipment shall not be used during periods that the vehicle is stopped, parked or otherwise in a stationary position.. .020 In all residential zones and within two hundred feet of any boundary thereof, no sound-amplifying equipment shall be operated or used for noncommercial purposes between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. of the following day. .030 In all non-residential zones, except such portions thereof as may be included within two hundred feet of the boundary of any residential zone, the operation or use of sound-amplifying equipment for commercial purposes is prohibited between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. of the following day. .040 In all non-residential zones, except such portions thereof as may be included within two hundred feet of the boundary of any residential zone, the operation or use of sound-amplifying equipment for noncommercial purposes is prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. of the following day. .050 Sound emanating from sound-amplifying equipment shall not be audible to a person of normal hearing acuity within an enclosed building (other than a building within which the sound emanate) at a distance in excess of two hundred feet from the sound-amplifying equipment. .060 In no event shall the sound-amplifying equipment be unreasonably loud, raucous, jarring or disturbing to a person of normal sensitiveness within the area of audibility, or disturb the peace or quiet of any neighborhood. .070 It shall be unlawful for any person to operate or use any sound-amplifying equipment within, upon or adjacent to the premises of any hospital, school, or publicly owned or operated arena, stadium, convention center or auditorium, while in use, in a manner which disturbs, disrupts or interferes with the conduct of any event, business or activity of any nature then occurring within such building or premises. Nothing contained in this subsection shall be deemed to prohibit any conduct which is otherwise prohibited by California Penal Code Sections 302 or 403, or any other provision of State law. (Ord. 4059 § 1 (part); October 9, 1979; Ord. 5781 § 1; September 25, 2001; Ord. 5941 § 1 (part); September 14, 2004.) 6.72.030 DEFINITIONS. 4 .010 The word "person," as used herein, shall include the singular and the plural, and shall also mean and include any person, firm, corporation, association, club, partnership, society or any other form of association or organization. .020 The words "sound-amplifying equipment," as used herein, shall mean any device for the amplification of the human voice, music or any other sound. .030 The word "zone," as used herein, shall mean the zoning designation given to any public or private property pursuant to the provisions of Title 18 of this Code. Any public or private street, alley or other right-of- way shall be deemed to have the same zoning designation as the public or private property immediately contiguous to such street, alley or right-of-way. Where the property on each side of a street, alley or right-of- way bears a different zoning designation, each such zoning designation shall be deemed to extend to the centerline of such street, alley or right-of-way. .040 Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to permit or authorize any activity or sound level which is otherwise prohibited by any provision of State law.(Ord. 4059 § 1 (part); October 9, 1979; Ord. 5941 § 1 (part); September 14, 2004.) 6.72.050 PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS. The first violation of this chapter by any person occurring within any twelve-month period shall be punishable as an infraction in accordance with applicable provisions of the California Penal Code and the California Government Code. The second and all subsequent violations of this chapter by such person occurring within any twelve-month period shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. (Ord. 5941 § 1 (part); September 14, 2004.) 3. Night time glare in our backyard and home from bright lights on building. Noise from people screaming, speaking in tongues, singing, giving sermons. Car exhaust, large assembly and kitchen fire hazards, building not used as planned, accumulative effects. http://local.anaheim.net/docs_agend/questys_pub//MG49619/AS49658/AS49661/AI49690/DO49692/DO_4969 2.PDF http://www.anaheim.net/932/EIR-No-330-Volume-I-FEIR Home City Hall Departments Planning & Building Planning & Zoning General Plan Environmental Impact Report EIR No. 330 Volume I: FEIR EIR No. 330 Volume I: Final EIR (General Plan and Zoning Code Update) Cover and Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Introduction 3. Environmental Setting 4. Project Description 5.1 Aesthetics - increased nighttime illumination 5.2 Air Quality - increased traffic and car exhaust 5.3 Biological Resources 5.4 Cultural Resources 5.5 Geology and Soils 5.6 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 5.7 Hydrology and Water Quality 5.8 Land Use and Relevant Planning 5 5.9 Mineral Resources 5.10 Noise - The evaluation of noise impacts associated with a proposed project includes: • Reviewing existing ambient noise levels, including modeling and field monitoring in the project area; • Determining the noise impacts associated with the development of the General Plan and Zoning Code update; • Determining the long-term noise impacts on proposed development within the proposed General Plan area; and, • Determining the long-term noise impacts from project-related traffic. 5.11 Police and Fire- The proposed General Plan and Zoning Code Update would increase the overall demand on fire and police protection services in the City of Anaheim. Future growth in accordance with the General Plan and Zoning Code Update are expected to create the typical range of fire service calls, including structure fires, garbage bin fires, car fires, and electrical fires. 5.12 Population and Housing - does’t add jobs 5.13 Public Services and Facilities 5.14 Recreation 5.15 Traffic and Circulation 6. Cumulative Impacts - future impacts of changing building to church - 6.1 OVERVIEW Section 15355 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines defines cumulative impacts as: "...two or more individual effects which when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts." 7. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 8. Alternatives 9. Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes 10. Growth Inducing Impacts - The purpose of a General Plan is to guide growth and development in a community. Accordingly, the General Plan is premised on a certain amount of growth taking place. Orange County, as well as the entire Southern California region, has experienced dramatic growth the past two decades and this trend is expected to continue into the next century. The focus of the General Plan, then, is to provide a framework in which the growth can be managed and to tailor it to suit the needs of the community and surrounding area. 11. Impacts Found Not to be Significant 12. Organizations and Individuals Contacted 13. Report Preparation Personnel 14. Bibliography 4. On page 17 of building code for Anaheim. Groups and Religious assembly needs a conditional permit and must occur on the ground floor. Community & Religious Assembly C GF P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit Required N=Prohibited 6 GF=Ground Floor Commercial 5. Are these codes being met? Parking 0.333 space per fixed seat, or 29 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA, whichever results in a greater number of spaces, plus 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for office use, plus, if a kitchen facility is provided, 0.02 space per person for the maximum capacity figure of the assembly area determined by the City Fire Department; if other types of ancillary uses other than a Sunday school are included, a parking demand study may be required. trees planted 010 Preventing Structural Damage. Trees that have a shallow root system that may damage nearby structures, such as foundations, walls and sidewalks, shall be avoided. A root barrier at least twenty-four (24) inches deep shall be used for any tree planted less than five (5) feet from sidewalks, paved areas, and other structures potentially subject to root damage. .030 Annoying Flowers and Fruits. Trees or other plants that produce flowers or fruit shall not be placed where the flowers or fruit will cause a nuisance or hazard. .040 Shrub Height. Shrubs and similar plants near driveways shall be selected and maintained so as not to exceed three (3) feet in height within seven (7) feet from the adjacent public right-of-way unless a greater height is approved by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager if he or she determines that the plant material does not impact line-of-sight visibility of an adjacent fence or wall. 1 Elly Morris From:Nicholas J. Taylor Sent:Monday, August 07, 2017 7:30 AM To:Elly Morris Subject:Item 3 - 2620 W. Orange From: Grant Hier [mailto:ghier@lcad.edu] Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 5:33 PM To: Jonathan Borrego <JBorrego@anaheim.net>; Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net>; David See <DSee@anaheim.net> Subject: Hier_Please Consider Dear Sirs: In your original recommendation to the Planning Commission to grant a conditional permit for 2620 West Orange you wrote that you believe that “…conditions of approval would mitigate noise impacts and ensure that the use operates in a manner compatible with surrounding office, commercial, and residential uses” and that “The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05887 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim…” The residents being negatively impacted by the constant disruptions at this location very strongly believe these assumptions are patently false. We urge you to re-consider the following points, on which all of the surrounding residents from several surrounding streets are in agreement: NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 2  12’ hedges will not sufficiently block views from all windows affected  12’ hedges will not sufficiently block noise from balcony.  Hedges and/or balcony enclosures will not stop: a. people’s voices from the parking lot immediately adjacent to several homes  even casual voices carry over the wall that separates the property from homes nearby, and churchgoers are often excited and shouting, and the children boisterous. This noise travels directly into our homes. Recordings confirm this. b. the slamming of doors from cars parked 10 feet from multiple back yards — there are 22 spaces that are far too close to our yards. c. the chirping of car alarms being set and unlocked before and after services (especially the 9 am services where arrivals begin far earlier with people bringing food and set up early, and after the 7 pm services with people often lingering until wall past 10 pm and at times 11 pm. Police reports and recordings confirm this. d. the blaring of car alarms that go off during services Due to these realities, weekend activities at that location have unfairly caused—and we fear will continue to unfairly cause—suffering for nearby residents, greatly diminishing our quality of life. We feel, to a person, that you should not just recommend against, but very strongly recommend against any church activites at this site. As with so many other points of contention in this case, these seeking the permit have denied these points, but we have documentation extant taken by multiple parties. Indeed, the same complains are coming from dozens of people who have offered written or verbal testimony that this is true.  No fewer than eight households, including some not on Kenmore, have expressed objections to the use of that building as a church because of the ongoing disruption (some of these objections you have not seen, on neighborhood email threads).  We are teachers and community volunteers. We love children and have taught them. We love community gatherings, and have helped to organize them, and have for decades. o As such, we know that controlling students after school and adults after meetings is impossible to do sufficiently in regards to the situation we have here with the abutting of the parking lot to homes. Those objecting to allowing the permits include, among others: 3 â an environmental scientist working for the government â a homemaker â a businesswoman â a city building inspector â a high school science teacher â a professor and former newspaper and magazine editor â a career nurse â an elementary school teacher â a business executive and college instructor â a writer and actor â a former investigative journalist and reporter (for OC Register, LA Times, LA Weekly, etc.) and college lecturer â a retired corporate executive To a person, they all adamantly object to that space being used as a church, have expressed that their health and the peace of the neighborhood continues to be disturbed, despite the recent efforts of the church to be quieter. A summary of their claims on record: â that they “feel like prisoners in their own home” â that they “have lost their days of rest” each and every weekend â that the church has repeatedly lied about construction (and multiple parties have audio and visual evidence to prove this) â that the church has lied about when they make noise ( and multiple parties have audio and visual evidence to prove this) â that these actions have been allowed to continue for more than a year now—and that fact has unfairly caused them to suffer We are unanimous in our position that: â such disruptions should be stopped immediately, and certainly not be allowed to continue, much less for another 9 months or more while permits are being approved, much less having those permits be approved and thereby allowing the harm to Anaheim residents to continue indefinitely. â there would be far more harm caused by allowing the permits than by denying them. The greater good is to not allow a permit or even a conditional use permit, or any exemptions to the public protections in place. â even if permits are granted and construction is allowed to block noise and sightlines, there is no way to control the excessive noise from church goers arriving and leaving during Saturday services, which are the most disruptive. You MUST NOT allow Saturday services to continue: there are three services each Saturday, with people arriving all day long from early morning to late evening, with 70+ attendees 4 leaving late at night. This is a great burden on the residents nearby, and has caused suffering for more than a year now. We can not tolerate additional Saturday disruptions. It is grossly unfair to the residents. â this is simply not a good place for a church to be located. Thank you for considering these points in you deliberations. Sincerely, Grant Hier -- G R A N T H I E R PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH + CREATIVE WRITING LAGUNA COLLEGE OF ART + DESIGN GREAT ART MATTERS 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: AUGUST 7, 2017 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05925 LOCATION: 1105 East Katella Avenue (Parallel Apartment Community) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is The Wolff Company and the property owner is Platinum Vista Apartments, L.P, represented by Mason Williams. The agent is Outdoor Dimensions, represented by Michele Kazerooni. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a coordinated sign program for the Parallel apartment community. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 11, Accessory Structures) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05925. BACKGROUND: The proposed coordinated sign program is for the 389-unit Parallel apartment community, located on a 4.12-acre property in the Platinum Triangle. The General Plan designates the property for Mixed Use land uses and the property is within the “I” Industrial Zone and the “PTMU” Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The City Council approved the apartment community in 2014 through a development agreement in accordance with the PTMU Overlay Zone. The development is currently under construction. Surrounding land uses include industrial businesses to the north and apartments to the west, east, and south across Katella Avenue. PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a coordinated sign program for the Parallel apartment community. Two wall signs, one projecting sign, four address signs, and one leasing center sign, all of which are building mounted, are proposed as part of the coordinated sign program. The following site plan and elevations identify the proposed sign locations. The signs reflect and complement the architecture of the buildings that they identify. The complete sign program is included as Exhibit C to the Draft Resolution. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05925 August 7, 2017 Page 2 of 5 SITE PLAN Address 1 Address 2 Building ID 1 Projecting Sign Address 3 Address 4 Building ID 2 Leasing Center CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05925 August 7, 2017 Page 3 of 5 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: The PTMU Overlay Zone requires applicants to submit a coordinated sign program to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of the first sign permit. Residential uses in the PTMU Overlay Zone are subject to the same sign code requirements as all other multiple-family residential zones. These requirements permit one sign per frontage. The Code permits two signs per frontage if the applicant proposes the signs as entry monument signs on opposite sides of main driveway/pedestrian entrance. The wall signs cannot exceed a maximum sign area of 20 square feet. Monument signs cannot exceed a maximum height of four feet. If the coordinated sign program meets these Code requirements, Staff can approve it administratively. Sign Location Type Height Width Area Building ID 1 Faces Katella Avenue, Center of Building South Elevation Wall 3.5 ft. 10 ft. 35 sq. ft. Building ID 2 Faces South Betmore Lane at corner of Katella Avenue, West Elevation Wall 3.5 ft. 10 ft. 35 sq. ft. Projecting Sign Faces Katella Avenue, South Elevation Wall Two-Sided 10.3 ft. 3.6 ft. 37 sq. ft. Each Side Address 1 & 2 Faces Katella Avenue, One on each Corner of Building, South Elevation Wall 1 ft. 1.95 ft. 1.95 sq. ft. Address 3 Faces South Betmore Lane at corner of Katella Avenue, West Elevation Wall 1 ft. 1.95 ft. 1.95 sq. ft. Address 4 Faces South Betmore Lane to the right of the vehicle entrance, West Elevation Wall 1 ft. 1.95 ft. 1.95 sq. ft. Leasing Center Above Leasing Office in vehicle parking area Wall 1.4 ft. 7.125 ft. 35 sq. ft. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05925 August 7, 2017 Page 4 of 5 However, in order to provide design flexibility within the Platinum Triangle, if a project cannot meet these requirements, the applicant may submit the coordinated sign program, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. In the case of the Parallel apartment community, staff believes that providing design flexibility for the coordinated sign program would be appropriate due to the configuration of the buildings and project. The standard multi-family residential sign code requirements are not well suited to identify a large-scale development project with multiple buildings, located on separate parcels; and, therefore, necessitating a more comprehensive sign program to distinguish the community. Before the Planning Commission may approve the conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which the Code authorizes a conditional use permit; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. In addition, the Planning Commission must also make the following findings specific to approval of a coordinated sign program: 1) Signs shall complement the architecture of the buildings on the same property and provide a unifying element along the streetscape; and 2) The size, scale and style of signs shall be internally consistent and consistent with the scale of the buildings located on the same property and the surrounding land uses. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05925 August 7, 2017 Page 5 of 5 The proposed coordinated sign program for Parallel is consistent with and complementary to the apartment community’s size, massing and overall aesthetics. The applicant has submitted signs designed with high quality materials, a contemporary style and complementary exterior colors and finishes. The applicant has submitted sign sizes consistent with the scale of the buildings. The signs would provide a unifying and identifying element along the streetscape. The proposed signs are on private property and any illumination of the signs would not spill over the property lines. As a result, the signs would not adversely affect any adjoining land uses or future growth and development in the area. Additionally, the signs would serve as the necessary means of identification for visitors, deliveries, and emergency vehicles to the 389- unit apartment complex. Overall, the implementation of a coordinated sign program would provide project identification, improved visibility and cohesive design elements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 11 – Accessory Structures) which consist of construction, or placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: The applicant has proposed signs that are tasteful, complement the apartment community’s design and architecture, and consistent with the scale of the surrounding buildings. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Christine Saunders Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Development Summary 3. Sign Program I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area ADEV2017-00061Parallel Apartments I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area AINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVivere Lofts Apartments I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BMAGNOLIAPARK I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area AKatella Grand Apartmen ts I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVivere Flats Apartments I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BPARK VIRIDIAN APTS I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT I (PTMU)OfficeIND. FIRMS I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area ACoral Tre ePark I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BCore Apartments I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area AINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area AVACANT I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area AOFFICE E KATELLA AVE S B E T M O R L N E MASON LN S A U B U R N W A Y S M A R K E T S T S W E S T S I D E D R E W R IGH T CIR E.K A T E L L A A V ES. H A R B O R B L V D S . L E W I S S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S . H A S T E R S T S . A N A H E I M B L V D S . S U N K I S T S T E. GENE AUTRY WAY S .D O U G L A S S R D W.KATELLA AVE 1 1 0 5 Ea st Katella Avenue D E V N o. 2017-00061 Subject Property APN: 082-261-36 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 16 E KATELLA AVE S B E T M O R L N E MASON LN S A U B U R N W A Y S M A R K E T S T S W E S T S I D E D R E WRIGHT CIR E.K A T E L L A A V ES. H A R B O R B L V D S . L E W I S S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S . H A S T E R S T S . A N A H E I M B L V D S . S U N K I S T S T E. GENE AUTRY WAY S .D O U G L A S S R D W.KATELLA AVE 1 1 0 5 Ea st Katella Avenue D E V N o. 2017-00061 Subject Property APN: 082-261-36 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Photo:May 2016 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2017-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2017-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05925 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2017-00061) (1105 EAST KATELLA AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05925 to conditionally permit a coordinated sign program in association with the Parallel apartment community at 1105 East Katella Avenue in the City of Anaheim (the Property"). The Property is generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 4.12-acres, is developed with a new residential apartment community. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Mixed Use land uses. The Property is located in the “I” Industrial Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone and the property owner has the option to develop the property in accordance with either the “I” Industrial Zone or the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone; and WHEREAS, the Property has been developed in accordance with the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"). Subsection .010 of Section 18.20.150 (Signs) of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Code requires that a "coordinated sign program" be submitted to the Planning Department and must address the following: (1) Signs shall complement the architecture of the building and provide a unifying element along the streetscape; (2) The size, scale, and style of signs shall be internally consistent, and consistent with the scale of the buildings of which they are a part; and (3) Wall signs for ground floor uses shall be placed between the doorway and the upper façade, and shall be located at approximately the same height as all other ground floor wall signs to create a unifying, horizontal pattern. WHEREAS, signs for residential uses developed in accordance with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone shall also be subject to the requirements of Section 18.44.070 (Signs in Residential Zones) of Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the Code; and if said signs do not conform to these requirements, per Section 18.44.055 (Coordinated Sign Program) of Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the Code, the coordinated sign program shall be subject to the approval