PC 2018/04/16
City of Anaheim
Planning Commission
Agenda
Monday, April 16, 2018
Council Chamber, City Hall
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California
• Chairperson: Bill Dalati
• Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Michelle Lieberman
• Commissioners: John Armstrong, Jess Carbajal, John Gillespie,
Kimberly Keys, Steve White
• Call To Order - 5:00 p.m.
• Pledge Of Allegiance
• Public Comments
• Public Hearing Items
• Commission Updates
• Discussion
• Adjournment
For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the
agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary.
A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building
Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff
report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on
Thursday, April 12, 2018, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority
of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally
exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning
and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
California, during regular business hours.
You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following
e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net
04-16-2018
Page 2 of 6
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications,
Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations,
Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission
action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written
form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City
Clerk.
The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public
hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City
Clerk of said hearing.
If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council
at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M.
Public Comments
This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the
exception of public hearing items.
04-16-2018
Page 3 of 6
Public Hearing Items
ITEM NO. 2
VARIANCE NO. 2018-05105
(DEV2018-00021)
Location: 515 West Katella Avenue
Request: The applicant requests a variance to permit
two wall signs on adjacent elevations on an existing,
recently remodeled hotel (Wyndham Garden Anaheim,
formerly Ramada Plaza Anaheim).
Environmental Determination: The Planning
Commission will consider whether the proposed action is
Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section
15311, Class 11 (Accessory Structures).
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Elaine Thienprasiddhi
ethien@anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05943
(DEV2017-00111)
Location: 3191 East La Palma Avenue
Request: For a conditional use permit to allow a new
brewery within an existing industrial building; the
brewery will include beer manufacturing and retail sales,
a tasting room, banquet hall, and mural visible from the
public right-of-way.
Environmental Determination: The Planning
Commission will consider whether the proposed action is
Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section
15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities).
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Nick Taylor
njtaylor@anaheim.net
04-16-2018
Page 4 of 6
ITEM NO. 4
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05957
(DEV2018-00015)
Location: 195 West Center Street Promenade
Request: For a conditional use permit to allow a
restaurant, bar with alcoholic beverage sales for on-site
consumption, and live entertainment in conjunction with
a new nightclub to be located within an existing
commercial building.
Environmental Determination: The Planning
Commission will consider whether the proposed action is
Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section
15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities).
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Nick Taylor
njtaylor@anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 5
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2005-00008G
(DEV2013-00034A)
Location: 1404 East Katella Avenue
Request: To amend the Development Agreement
between the City of Anaheim and PT Metro, LLC for the
A-Town Metro Project to add a term extension milestone
at the seven and one-half year mark.
Environmental Determination: The Planning
Commission will consider whether the Addendum No. 4
to the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, along with
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321, together with other
previously approved environmental documentation,
serves as the appropriate environmental documentation.
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Scott Koehm
skoehm@anaheim.net
04-16-2018
Page 5 of 6
ITEM NO. 6
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00519
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00311
MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2018-00674
(DEV2018-00020)
Location: Citywide
Request: A City-initiated request to: (i) receive a City
Council directed parks needs assessment document; (ii)
amend the General Plan to reflect the results and
recommendations from park needs assessment
document, update General Plan information on existing
park facilities including additions due to new and
planned development, and amend General Plan land
use designations for park properties owned by the City
of Anaheim from existing land use designations to the
Parks land use designation; and, (iii) reclassify park
properties owned by the City of Anaheim from the zones
that the park properties are currently within to the Public
Recreation (PR) Zone.
Environmental Determination: The Planning
Commission will consider whether the proposed action is
exempt from the requirements to prepare additional
environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section
15060(c)(2).
Resolution No. ______
Resolution No. ______
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Charles Guiam
cguiam@anaheim.net
Adjourn to Monday, April 30, 2018 at 5:00 p.m.
04-16-2018
Page 6 of 6
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at:
4:50 p.m. April 11, 2018 (TIME) (DATE)
LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK
SIGNED:
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all
members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin
in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative
formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation
thereof.
Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids
or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification,
accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person
at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later
than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting.
La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos
los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen
nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal.
Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos
apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de
Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y
reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo.
Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios
auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación,
ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en
persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139,
antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: APRIL 16, 2018
SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 2018-05105
LOCATION: 515 West Katella Avenue (Wyndham Garden Anaheim)
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Kenneth Pang with
Creative Design Associates and the property owner is Steven Hsu.
REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a variance to permit two wall signs
on adjacent elevations on an existing hotel.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from
further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) under Class 11 (Accessory Structures) of the State CEQA Guidelines, and
approve Variance No. 2018-05105.
BACKGROUND: The Wyndham Garden Anaheim hotel, which was formerly the
Ramada Plaza Anaheim, is located on the subject one-acre property. The site is
located within the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan (ARSP) and designated for Commercial-Recreation land uses by the
General Plan. Surrounding land uses include a vacant parcel to the north; the Hyatt
House hotel to the south, across Katella Avenue; the Hotel Indigo to the east; and a
commercial center to the west.
The property owner recently remodeled the subject Wyndham Garden Anaheim
Hotel, including significant changes to the exterior architecture. The hotel, before the
remodel, had one wall sign advertising the Ramada Plaza at the top of the west
elevation, facing Harbor Boulevard. The property owner recently replaced this sign
with a new Wyndham Garden sign. The hotel also has a monument sign along the
Katella Avenue street frontage; the sign face was modified to reflect the new hotel
brand.
PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes a second wall sign, to be located on the south
elevation, immediately above the porte cochere. The new sign would include a logo
and the text “Wyndham Garden Hotel.” The maximum letter height would be 24
inches and the sign would be 110 square feet in area.
VARIANCE NO. 2018-05105
April 16, 2018
Page 2 of 5
Aerial View
West Elevation with Existing Sign
Proposed
Sign
Existing
Sign
7 – 8 foot
building
separation
VARIANCE NO. 2018-05105
April 16, 2018
Page 3 of 5
Partial South Elevation with Proposed Sign Location and
Showing Proximity of Adjacent Hotel
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Before the Planning Commission may approve a variance, it
must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions
exist:
1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other properties under
identical zoning classification in the vicinity;
2) That, because of special circumstances, shown above, strict application of the Zoning
Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning
classification in the vicinity.
The ARSP permits a hotel at a midblock location to have up to two signs, if the signs are on
opposite building elevations. Based on the ARSP, the hotel would be allowed to add an
additional wall sign on the east elevation. No changes are requested for the existing wall sign
that is located on the west elevation. A variance is required for the proposed wall sign because it
is proposed on the south building elevation, which is adjacent to the elevation that already
includes a wall sign.
7 – 8 feet
VARIANCE NO. 2018-05105
April 16, 2018
Page 4 of 5
The applicant submitted the attached letter of justification indicating that he is requesting the
variance because installing a second sign on the opposite (east) elevation, as permitted by the
Code, would be ineffective since the adjacent hotel would block the sign’s visibility. Staff
reviewed the applicant’s letter of justification and staff concurs with the applicant. Staff believes
that the Planning Commission can make the required findings to support a variance for the
proposed sign.
The subject hotel and adjacent hotel to the east are both older buildings that predate the ARSP,
and are legal-nonconforming with respect to side setbacks. A new hotel built under today’s
standards would have a setback of ten feet from the property line, such that there would be 20
feet of separation between the two hotels. In the existing condition, the two buildings are about
seven to eight feet apart. A Code-compliant sign placed on the east elevation of the subject hotel
would not be visible from Katella Avenue, due to the hotel to the east, and would not serve its
intended purpose.
Additionally, the subject hotel is situated similar to a corner lot since the commercial retail center
to the west is single-story construction, such that the majority of the hotel’s west building
elevation is visible from the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue. In the ARSP,
a hotel on a corner parcel may have up to four signs, with one sign on each elevation. The
applicant is not requesting an increase in the number of permitted signs, but rather that the City
permit an additional wall sign on the south building elevation which is visible from the public
right of way.
Staff believes that there are special circumstances applicable to this property due to the close
proximity of the hotel’s east building elevation to the adjacent building, which is of similar size
and massing. This site condition would make a code compliant sign ineffective, as it would not
be visible from the street. Staff also believes that the proposed sign on the south elevation would
add visual interest to the building façade and provide additional wayfinding for guests of the
hotel.
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the
effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within the Class 11, Accessory
Structures, Categorical Exemption. Class 11 consists of construction, or placement of minor
structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial or institutional facilities including on
premise signs. The proposed project is a request to permit two signs for a hotel. Pursuant to
Section 15300.02 (c) and 15311 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no
unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a
significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt
from the provisions of CEQA.
VARIANCE NO. 2018-05105
April 16, 2018
Page 5 of 5
CONCLUSION: As indicated in this staff report, Staff believes that there are special
circumstances applicable to this property that are sufficient to justify the applicant’s request for a
sign variance to permit a new wall sign on the south building elevation.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Elaine Thienprasiddhi Irma Huitron
Senior Planner Acting Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Draft Variance Resolution
2. Variance Justification Letter
3. Photographs
4. Sign Plan
SP 92-2DEV 2018-00021WYNDHAMGARDENINN
SP 92-2DA1RIVIERAMOTEL
SP 92-2DA1SPRINGHILL SUITES BY MARRIOTT
SP 92-1DA1CANDY CANE INN
SP 92-1DA1ABC MART
SP 92-1DA17-11MARKET
SP 92-2DA1PORTOFINO INN & SUITES
SP 92-2DA1AMERICA'S BEST VALUEINN & SUITES
SP 92-2DA1LITTLE BOYBLUE MOTEL
SP 92-2DA1ISLANDERINN &SUITES
SP 92-2DA1SUPER 8MOTEL
SP 92-1DA5ANAHEIM PLAZAHOTEL
SP 92-1DA3AGARDENWALK PARKING STRUCTURE
SP 92-2DA1RESIDENCE INN MARRIOTT
SP 92-1DA1ANAHEIM DESERTPALMS HOTEL
SP 92-2DA1RED LION HOTEL
SP 92-1DA1CALIFORNIA ADVENTURE
SP 92-1DA1CALIFORNIA ADVENTURE
SP 92-1DA5ANAHEIM PLAZAHOTEL
SP 92-2DA1CASTLE INN& SUITES
SP 92-2DA1VACANT
SP 92-2DA1ANAHEIM RESORTRETAIL CENTER
SP 92-2DA1HOLIDAY INNEXPRESS ANAHEIM
SP 92-2DA1HYATT HOUSE HOTEL
SP 92-2DA1IHOP
SP 92-1DA4PARKING LOT
SP 92-1DA4PARKING LOT
SP 92-1DA5GARDENWALK
SP 92-2DA1SHERATON PARKHOTEL
W KATELLA AVE
S H A R B O R B L V D
W. KATELLA AVE
S . H A R B O R B L V D
S . L E W I S S T
W. ORANGEWOOD AVES. N I N T H S T
S . W A L N U T S T
S . H A S T E R S T
E. KATELLA AVE
S . A N A H E
I M B L V D
E. GENE AUTRY WAYS. C L E M E N T I N E S T
5 1 5 W e st K a t e l la Avenue
D E V N o . 2 0 1 8-00021
Subject Property APN: 082-271-05
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Photo:Ma y 2 016
W KATELLA AVE
S H A R B O R B L V D
W. KATELLA AVE
S . H A R B O R B L V D
S . L E W I S S T
W. ORANGEWOOD AVES. N I N T H S T
S . W A L N U T S T
S . H A S T E R S T
E. KATELLA AVE
S . A N A H E
I M B L V D
E. GENE AUTRY WAYS. C L E M E N T I N E S T
5 1 5 W e st K a t e l la Avenue
D E V N o . 2 0 1 8-00021
Subject Property APN: 082-271-05
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Photo:Ma y 2 016
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2018-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING
VARIANCE NO. 2018-05105 AND MAKING
CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2018-00021)
(515 WEST KATELLA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the
“Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for Variance No. 2018-05105 to permit
two wall signs on adjacent elevations on an existing hotel, at a certain real property located at
515 West Katella Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as
generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the
“Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately one acre, is developed with a
hotel (Wyndham Garden Anaheim). The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for
Commercial Recreation land uses. The Property is located within the boundaries of the
Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) of the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan (ARSP) area and is subject to the zoning and development standards set forth in Section
18.116.060 (Development Density Areas – Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development
Area 1)) and Section 18.116.070 (Uses – Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development
Area 1)) of Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and
Development Standards) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on April 16, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Variance No.
2018-05105 (the "Proposed Project"), and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the
preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is
within that class of projects (i.e., Class 11 – Accessory Structures) which consists of
construction, or placement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial or
institutional facilities including on premise signs, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15311
of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the
environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
- 2 - PC2018-***
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to proposed Variance No. 2018-05105, does find and determine the
following:
SECTION NO. 18.116.160.060 Business Identification Wall Sign – Hotel/Motel
(For buildings at mid-block locations, signs shall be
located on non-adjacent building elevations; two
signs are proposed on adjacent building elevations)
1. The subject hotel and adjacent hotel are both older buildings that predate the ARSP,
and they are legal-nonconforming with respect to side setbacks. A new hotel built under today’s
standards would have a setback of ten feet from the property line, such that there would be 20
feet of separation between buildings; and
2. The strict application of the Zoning Code would deprive the Property of privileges
enjoyed by other properties under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity of the
Property since, in the existing condition, the two buildings are about seven to eight feet apart,
such that a Code-compliant sign placed on the east elevation of the subject hotel would not be
visible from Katella Avenue and would not serve its intended purpose; and
3. The hotel is located next to a single-story commercial retail center at the corner of
Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue, such that the majority of the hotel’s west building
elevation is visible from the intersection. This condition provides the hotel with the
characteristics of a corner property. In the ARSP, a hotel on a corner parcel may have up to four
signs, with one sign on each elevation.
and;
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Variance No. 2018-05105, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval
described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to
preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance
with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be
amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing
is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the
modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant
progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
- 3 - PC2018-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this
permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of
the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
April 16, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 4 - PC2018-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 16, 2018, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of April, 2018.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2018-***
- 6 - PC2018-***
EXHIBIT “B”
VARIANCE NO. 2018-05105
(DEV2018-00021)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively
referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from
any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against
Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision
of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the
proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to
the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity
of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification
is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or
costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit,
claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and
other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in
connection with such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
2 The subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with the plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim
by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
3 Approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed
request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim
Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and
Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or
findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any
other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
4 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of
the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building
permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all
charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or
may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
-Page 1-
JUSTIFICATION FOR
VARIANCE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING SERVICES DIVISION
Revised 10/2009
Sections 18.74.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code requires that before any variance
may be granted by the Planning Commission, the following shall be shown:
1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including
size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other
property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; and
2. That, because of such special circumstances, strict application of the zoning
code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under
identical zoning classification in the vicinity.
In order to determine if special circumstances exist, and to assist the Planning Commission
to arrive at a decision, please provide a letter of justification to answer each of the following
questions regarding the property for which a variance is sought, as fully and completely as
possible. The letter should list each code section for which a variance is required including
a brief description of the requirement. Justification must be provided for each separate
variance request.
1. Identify any special physical characteristics of the property such as shape,
topography, location or surroundings that cause the requested development to not
meet zoning codes.
The property currently meets zoning code, but we would like to request installing a sign on
the south (Katella Ave) façade since there is no sign on that main street there currently.
Current code per Table 116-S under 18.116.160 SIGN REGULATIONS of the zoning code
will allow us to place a sign only on the east façade which faces no streets and is blocked
entirely by the Hotel Indigo next door; it would be a sign without function and no visibility.
Since we cannot functionally put a 2nd sign on the eastern façade, we ask that we be able to
relocate the 2nd sign to the Katella Façade where it will be visible and can serve a purpose
instead.
There is currently no building sign on the Katella façade facing Katella Ave. This makes it
difficult for visitors and guests to find the hotel. Allowing the installation of a sign on Katella
Ave, will limit confusion and aid wayfinding for guests and visitors to the hotel.
Futhermore a sign on Katella facade will provide additional architectural visual interest to
the façade and contributes to a more beautiful project for the city of Anaheim.
2. Do other properties in the vicinity have the same type of physical characteristics
as this property? If so, please identify a few of them.
No other properties in vicinity are noted to have the unique characteristics exhibited on
our property.
CITY OF ANAHEIM JUSTIFICATION FOR A VARIANCE OR CODE WAIVER
Page 2 of 2
3. Identify any other neighboring properties that have the same type of
improvement that you are requesting.
Both the Hyatt House (1800 S Harbor Blvd) and Springhill Suites (1801 S Harbor Blvd)
across the street from the Wyndham Garden Hotel appear to have 4 building signs minimum
each while the Wyndham Garden Hotel only has 1 building sign. This puts our hotel at a
disadvantage in comparison to our neighbors.
4. Identify the cause of the special characteristics of the site that limits the ability to
comply with code requirements (e.g. natural slope of the land, placement of other
structures).
Placing a 2nd sign on non-adjacent building elevations doesn’t make sense for this project
location. There is a sign on the west façade (facing Harbor Blvd). Current code per Table
116-S under 18.116.160 SIGN REGULATIONS of the zoning code will allow us to place a
sign only on the east façade which faces no streets and is blocked entirely by the Hotel
Indigo next door; it would be a sign without function and no visibility. Since we cannot
functionally put a 2nd sign on the eastern façade, we ask that we be able to relocate the 2nd
sign to the Katella Façade where it will be visible and can serve a purpose instead.
Also given that the property to the West is a single story retail center, the hotel has, in
reality, the characteristics of a corner property; it can be seen from Harbor Blvd and from
Katella Ave. Per Table 116-S, corner property hotels can have up to 4 signs. Both the Hyatt
House (1800 S Harbor Blvd) and Springhill Suites (1801 S Harbor Blvd) across the street
from the Wyndham Garden Hotel appear to have 4 building signs minimum each while the
Wyndham Garden Hotel only has 1 building sign. This puts our hotel at a disadvantage in
comparison to our neighbors.
See the Parking Variance handout for variances relating to parking spaces.
********
WYNDHAM GARDEN ANAHEIM SITE PHOTO BOARD
515 W. KATELLA, ANAHEIM, CA 92802
SOUTH FACADE (KATELLA FACADE)WEST FACADE (HARBOR FACADE)
PARKING LOT FACADE (INTERIOR EAST FACADE)
SOUTH NEIGHBOR - HYATT HOUSE SOUTHWEST NEIGHBOR - SPRINGHILL SUITES
KATELLA FACADE WITH HOTEL INDIGO
EAST FACADE CONDITION ABUTTING HOTEL INDIGO
A
B
C
D
E
F G
N
A
D
FG C
E
B
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
We
s
t
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
AT
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
NO. 4
We
s
t
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
Existing:
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: APRIL 16, 2018
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05943
LOCATION: 3191 East La Palma Avenue (Brewery X)
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Scott Pennington of
Brewery X and the property owner is Ken Lester of CALCO, LLC.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) to permit a brewery within an existing industrial building. The brewery will
include beer manufacturing, retail sales of beer for off-premises consumption, a
tasting room, outdoor patio, a banquet room/flex space, and a wall mural on the front
elevation of the building.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt
under the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15301 (Class 1, Existing
Facilities), and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05943.
BACKGROUND: This 4.29-acre property is developed with a 76,824 square foot
industrial building. The property is located in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan
Development Area 1 (Industrial Area). The General Plan designates the property for
Industrial land uses. Surrounding land uses include industrial land uses to the east
and west, an Orange County Water District reservoir to the north, and a business
park across La Palma Avenue to the south.
PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to establish a brewery within the existing
76,824 square foot industrial building. The brewery would consist of an
approximately 47,000 square foot production brewery with ancillary offices and
storage areas, 7,000 square foot tasting room, 1,000 square foot patio, 5,000 square
foot “flex space” that can be used as a private banquet room or additional tasting
room area, and a 2,500 square foot merchandise retail area. The proposed hours of
operation for the tasting room would be 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. daily, and the
production brewery would operate from 4:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. daily. The parking
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05943
April 16, 2018
Page 2 of 5
lot would be restriped to meet all City standards for parking space dimensions, circulation, and
sight triangle visibility. A total of 242 parking spaces would be provided on site. A more detailed
description of the project is provided below.
Floor Plan
Production Brewery: The brewery would consist of all equipment necessary to operate a
production brewery, including cold and dry storage areas, employee offices, and a break room. Up
to 15 brewery employees would work shifts at off-peak hours, from 4:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. daily.
Typical delivery hours would be between 4:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. in vehicles as large as an 18-
wheel truck and trailer using an existing truck well at the rear of the building.
Tasting Room, Outdoor Patio, and Retail Areas: The tasting room and patio would have live
music approximately two to three times per week, beginning no earlier than 6:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday, and 11:00 a.m. on weekends. Music would cease at least a half hour prior to
closing. These areas would have a staff of 5-10 employees. Though no in-house food service is
proposed at this time, there would be a designated food truck staging area adjacent to the outdoor
patio. There would also be a retail area selling Brewery X merchandise such as hats, apparel,
packaged beer, and other brewery-related items.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05943
April 16, 2018
Page 3 of 5
Banquet Hall/Tasting Room Flex Space: The flex space would be used for both private events,
such as company parties and holiday parties with up to 250 guests, or as additional tasting room
area open to the public when not reserved. The flex space hours would coincide with the tasting
room hours on the weekends and after 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. A removable roof is
proposed for this area to create a unique indoor/outdoor experience. Events in the flex space may
include amplified or live music that would occur during the specified hours for the outdoor patio,
or when the roof and all exterior doors are closed.
Mural: Wall murals are proposed on the front (south) elevation of the building with a theme
consisting of brewing history, equipment, and ingredients, with examples shown below. No
business advertisements are proposed in conjunction with the murals.
Typical Wall Murals
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a CUP, it must make a
finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a CUP is authorized by this
Zoning Code;
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow
the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either
the particular area or health and safety;
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed,
if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the
City of Anaheim.
The Zoning Code requires a CUP in this zone to permit a brewery with a tasting room, banquet
hall, and mural in order to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. The Zoning Code permits
breweries with accessory tasting rooms without the need for a CUP in most commercial and
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05943
April 16, 2018
Page 4 of 5
industrial zones in the City; however, a CUP is required in this case because the tasting room
exceeds the 750 square foot size limitation allowed by right in the Industrial zone. There is no
size limitation for breweries in DA-1 of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan.
The applicant is requesting approval of on and off-premises sales and consumption of beer. A
Type 23 (Small Beer Manufacturer) license, which authorizes a brewery, would be required from
the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). This request does not require
a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity.
The crime rate in this Reporting District is 46 percent above the city average and there were four
calls for service at this location in the past year. In the quarter mile radius surrounding the subject
property, the crime rate is below the city average and calls for service primarily consisted of petty
theft, and vandalism. Staff does not anticipate that the addition of beer sales and on-site
consumption at this location would contribute to an increase in crime if the business is operated
in a responsible manner and in compliance with the recommended conditions of approval. These
conditions include typical Police Department conditions, such as requiring a security plan, ABC
LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training for employees, and limitations on the
hours of operation and entertainment as described below.
The proposed uses are compatible with the surrounding land uses, would complement existing
uses within the Anaheim Canyon, including the existing Bottle Logic Brewery and tasting room
located across La Palma Avenue approximately 1,500 feet away, and would not have a
detrimental impact on adjacent land uses or adversely affect development within the area, subject
to compliance with the conditions of approval mentioned above. Brewery X would add to the
collection of unique breweries located in the general vicinity. This brewery would further
implement the Brew City initiative, which began in March 2014 when the City Council adopted
an ordinance permitting breweries and manufacturing of other alcoholic beverages in commercial
and industrial zones. The “Brew City” ordinance was an extension of the Mayor’s Regulatory
Relief Task Force’s larger efforts to brand Anaheim as a place where new and existing businesses
can open more quickly and with less “red tape” as compared to other cities in the region.
To ensure that this project does not cause any disturbances to the surrounding properties, staff
recommends conditions of approval that would restrict outdoor noise to ambient music only
during typical hours of operation for the surrounding businesses. Staff believes amplified music
outdoors would not have any adverse impacts outside of typical weekday business hours, given
that the surrounding properties consist of industrial and Orange County Water District reservoir
land uses. The proposal for live entertainment would require approval of a separate Entertainment
Permit. Through the Entertainment Permit review process, staff would have the ability to require
certain protections to ensure that the music does not disturb any nearby businesses. Any outdoor
festivals proposed in the future would be limited and only allowed up to four times a year through
the issuance of a Special Event Permit. Similar to an Entertainment Permit, a Special Event
Permit could include restrictions to ensure that such entertainment does not disturb surrounding
properties. Any outdoor events in excess of the four events permitted by the Special Event Permit
would require a CUP. Lastly, Traffic Engineering staff recommended a condition of approval
that requires any event in the flex space to begin outside of the 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. window on
weekdays to ensure that there are no traffic impacts during this peak traffic hour.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05943
April 16, 2018
Page 5 of 5
The Zoning Code requires 242 parking spaces during the p.m. peak hours if the flex space is used
as a banquet room operating at its maximum proposed capacity of 250 guests. Since there are 242
parking spaces proposed, adequate parking would be provided to accommodate the proposed
uses. The applicant has proposed limited hours for the flex space to ensure that there are no
potential traffic impacts during the weekday peak traffic periods. Accordingly, Planning and
Traffic staff recommend conditions of approval that would allow a maximum of 250 guests in the
banquet room and limit the hours of operation of the flex space to after 6:00 p.m. Monday through
Friday.
The proposed artistic mural would enhance the existing front elevation of the existing concrete
tilt-up building and complement the proposed entry façade improvements, which include a grain
silo and signage. As shown in the image above, the mural would consist of brewery-related
images such as grain silos and agricultural scenes. No business advertising is proposed on the
murals. Based on these factors, staff believes that the proposed use and murals would be
compatible with the surrounding area and recommends approval of the CUP.
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the
effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within the Class 1, Existing
Facilities, Categorical Exemption. Class 1 consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor
alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion
of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. The proposed project is a request to
permit a brewery within an existing industrial building. As such, the proposed project meets the
criteria for a Class 1 categorical exemption. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and 15301 of Title
14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the
proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and,
therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
CONCLUSION: The proposed brewery, tasting room, mural, and banquet hall would provide a
valuable amenity to the neighborhood and complement existing nearby businesses within the
Anaheim Canyon business district. The recommended conditions of approval would ensure that
the sale and consumption of beer and limitations on outdoor music would be compatible with
surrounding land uses. In addition, an adequate supply of parking and appropriate parking
management would be provided to serve the proposed use. Staff recommends approval of this
request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Nick Taylor Irma Huitron
Associate Planner Acting Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution
2. Letter of Operation
3. Police Memorandum
4. Project Plans
SP 2015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA4SERVICESTATION
SP 2015-1DA1BUSINESS PARK
SP 2015-1DA1SUBSTATION
SP 2015-1DA5AGRI-CULTURE
DA6O.C.F.C.D.
SP 2015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA5CARLS JR
DA6O.C.F.C.D.
SP 2015-1DA5STERLINGBUSINESSCOMPLEX
SP 2015-1DA5STERLINGBUSINESSCOMPLEX
SP 2015-1DA5STERLINGBUSINESSCOMPLEX
SP 2015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
E L A P A L M A A V E
N
S
H
E
P
A
R
D
S
T
E . M I R A L O M A A V E
E . L A P A L M A A V E
N
.
T
U
STIN
A
V
E
N
.
B
L
U
E
G
U
M
S
T
N
.
M
I
L
L
E
R
S
T
N . R I O V I S T A S T
3 1 9 1 E a s t L a Palma Ave
D E V N o . 2 0 1 7-00111
Subject Property APN: 345-081-05
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Photo:Ma y 2 016
E L A P A L M A A V E
N
S
H
E
P
A
R
D
S
T
E . M I R A L O M A A V E
E . L A P A L M A A V E
N
.
T
U
STIN
A
V
E
N
.
B
L
U
E
G
U
M
S
T
N
.
M
I
L
L
E
R
S
T
N . R I O V I S T A S T
3 1 9 1 E a s t L a Palma Ave
D E V N o . 2 0 1 7-00111
Subject Property APN: 345-081-05
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Photo:Ma y 2 016
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2018-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05943 AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2017-00111)
(3191 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05943 to
conditionally permit the establishment and operation of a brewery to include ancillary offices,
tasting room, outdoor patio, live entertainment, on and off-premises sales and consumption of
beer, banquet hall, and a mural visible from the public right-of-way at 3191 East La Palma
Avenue in the City of Anaheim (the Property"). The Property is generally depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 4.29 acres, is developed with an
existing industrial building. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the
Property for “I-L” Industrial land uses. The Property is located in the Anaheim Canyon Specific
Plan, Development Area 1 (Industrial Area); and
WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05943 has been requested to
conditionally permit the sale of beer for on- and off-premises consumption in
conjunction with a brewery, and to permit a banquet hall, with live entertainment
at the Property. Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05943 shall be referred to herein as the
“Proposed Project”; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on April 16, 2018, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and
to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the
preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the
Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 –
Existing Facilities) which consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing,
licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical
equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that
existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the
CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment
and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
- 2 - PC2018-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05943, does find and
determine the following facts:
1. The proposed request to permit a brewery with tasting room to include an outdoor
patio, a banquet hall, live entertainment, on and off-premises sales and consumption of alcoholic
beverages and a mural visible from the public right-of-way, "ACSP DA-1" Anaheim Canyon
Specific Plan Development Area 1 under Section 18.120.040 (Uses) of Chapter 18.120
(Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and
the zoning and development standards of the "ACSP DA-1" Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan
Development Area 1.
2. The uses proposed under Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05943, under the
conditions imposed, are compatible with the existing industrial uses in the surrounding area.
3. The size and shape of the site for the uses proposed under Conditional Use Permit No.
2017-05943 are, under the conditions imposed, adequate to allow the full development of the
proposed uses in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety
because the Project will adhere to all required land use standards.
4. The traffic generated by the uses proposed under Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-
05943, under the conditions imposed, will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and
highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by
this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets.
5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05943, under the conditions
imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as
the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval
for the use and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05943, subject to the conditions of approval set forth
in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Extensions for further
time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of
the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning
Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies
the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code,
- 3 - PC2018-***
and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or
approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of
this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of April 16, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter
18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 4 - PC2018-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 16, 2018, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of April, 2018.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2018-***
- 6 - PC2018-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05943 AND
(DEV2017-00111)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
1 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the property owner/developer
shall provide a note on plans indicating that:
a) All coatings and solvents will have a volatile organic
compound (VOC) content lower than required under Rule
1113 (i.e., super compliant paints).
b) All architectural coatings shall be applied either by (1) using a
high-volume, low pressure spray method operated at an air
pressure between 0.1 and 10 pounds per square inch gauge to
achieve a 65 percent application efficiency; or (2) manual
application using a paintbrush, hand-roller, trowel, spatula,
dauber, rag, or sponge, to achieve a 100 percent applicant
efficiency.
c) The construction contractor shall also use precoated/natural
colored building materials, where feasible.
The Building Division shall verify compliance during normal
construction site inspections. (AQ-4 MMRP No. 312)
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Division &
Building Division
2 The developer/owner shall submit a set of improvement plans for
Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in
determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to
the project prior to the issuance of any permit.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
3 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection
and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted
to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities
Department.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
4 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the
street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets
and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault
will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water
system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water
Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner
fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information
shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water
Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
- 7 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
5 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines,
as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing
water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated
and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim
Public Utilities Department.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
6 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current
Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or
fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if
continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no
longer needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs
to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
7 The Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim
(i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water meters and
fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire
hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement
for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of
the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on
the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s
standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include
language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any
special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including
but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete,
decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged
during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water
facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement and maintenance of
all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the
responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master
CC & Rs for the project.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
8 The developer/owner shall submit to the Public Utilities Department
Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow
rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project.
This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the
existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any
off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall
be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility
Rates, Rules, and Regulations.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
9 Building plans shall show conformance with the current version of
Engineering Standard Detail 473 pertaining to driveway spacing and
distance from public ROW to nearest parking space, subject to the
approval of the City Engineer. Subject property shall thereupon be
developed and maintained in conformance with said plans.
Public Works,
Development Services
- 8 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
10 Building plans shall show conformance with the current version of
Engineering Standard Detail 470 pertaining to parking standards.
Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in
conformance with said plans.
Public Works,
Development Services
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS
11 Owner shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the
water service connection(s) serving the property, above ground and
behind the property line and building setback in accordance with
Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
12 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of
Anaheim an easement 60 feet in width from the centerline of La
Palma Avenue.
Public Works,
Development Services
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
13 The Owner shall be responsible for restoring any special surface
improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-way,
public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited
to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls,
decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during
any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities.
Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface improvements
shall be included in the recorded Master C, C & R’s for the project
and the City easement deeds.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
14 The business shall not be operated in such a way as to be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare.
Police Department
15 Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent
area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over
within 24 hours of being applied.
Police Department
16 Any and all security officers provided shall comply with all State and
Local ordinances regulating their services, including, without
limitation, Chapter 11.5 of Division 3 of the California Business and
Profession Code. (Section 4.16.070 Anaheim Municipal Code)
Police Department
17 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim
Police Department. Such measures shall deter unlawful conduct of
employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and
movement of persons and vehicles, and prevent disturbances to the
nearby businesses.
Police Department
- 9 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
18 Managers, owners, and wait staff need to call the Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education
on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training. The contact number is
714-558-4101. A similar program may be used as long as it is
certified and must be renewed.
Police Department
19 There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase
required. Police Department
20 Signs shall be posted inside any patio doors leading outside the fenced
patio stating “No alcoholic beverages allowed past this point.”
Police Department
21 Tasting Room and Flex Space hours of operation shall be: 11 a.m. to
12 midnight daily, and shall comply with any other hour restrictions
stated in this document.
Police Department
22 All entertainment must end 30 minutes prior to closing. This includes
the banquet/event room. Police Department
23 Subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public
premise (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a
public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the Business and
Professions Code.
Police Department
24 Events in the banquet/event room must have food catered by a
restaurant or food truck with the appropriate caterer’s permit.
Police Department
25 Petitioner shall not share any profits, or pay any percentage or
commission to a promoter or any other person, based upon monies
collected as a door charge, cover charge, or any other form of
admission charge, including minimum drink orders, or the sale of
drinks.
Police Department
26 Outdoor events will require a “Special Event Permit” with four events
allowed per year.
Police Department
27 Flex Space private events are limited to 250 guests and 11 employees,
or any other combination of guests and employees that meet the
parking requirements established in the Zoning Code, so as not to
exceed 94 parking spaces.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
28 Amplified music or live entertainment shall be not begin earlier than
6:00 p.m. on weekdays or 11:00 a.m. on weekends, and shall cease
not later than one half hour prior to closing. Amplified music is
subject to approval of a separate Entertainment Permit.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
- 10 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
Division
29 The business shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of
Operation submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the
business operation as described in that document shall be subject to
review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial
conformance with the Letter of Operations and to ensure compatibility
with the surrounding uses.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
30 Ongoing during project operations, beer manufacturing operations
shall cease at 3:00 p.m. All trips related to the manufacturing
operations (employees leaving or arriving, deliveries, etc.) shall not
occur after 3:00 p.m.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
31 Ongoing during project operations, the “flex space” shall not be used
as additional tasting room on any weekday, prior to 6:00 p.m.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
32 Ongoing during project operations, the “flex space,” if used as a
special event space, shall not have the event begin or end between the
hours of 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., so as to not generate any vehicle
trips between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
33 Ongoing during project operations, vehicle deliveries, including
loading and unloading, shall be performed on site. Delivery vehicles
shall not block any part of the public right of way.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
GENERAL CONDITIONS
34 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new
and existing public water facilities (e.g. fire hydrants, service laterals,
meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.):
• 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs,
power poles, street lights, and trees.
• 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other
utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground
facilities.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
35 No public water mains or laterals shall be allowed under parking
stalls or parking lots.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
36 All new water service connections shall be made on the existing 12-
inch cast iron water main in La Palma Avenue. No new connections
shall be allowed on the existing 36-inch water transmission main.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
- 11 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
37 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the
issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building
permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all
charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or
may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
38 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred
to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all
claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees
concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or
determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to
determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition
attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to
include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded
against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or
litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs,
liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with
such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
39 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department
and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
March 28, 2018
Brewery X, Letter of Operations
Planned Operations Description
The project site, 3191 E. La Palma, is approximately 4.3 acres and has an existing 76,824 square foot industrial
building. The existing parking lot will be restriped for 244 total parking spaces. The primary intended use is a
production brewery with tasting room and outside patio, as well as a flexible area that can be used as additional
tasting room area or a banquet hall for private events. An attached floor plan sho ws the layout of the production
brewery and offices, barrel storage, outdoor patio, flex space, and retail merchandise area. A silo for the brewery
operation will be located on the exterior of the building. BREWERY X will be a type 23 facility per the Cali fornia
State Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) board.
Production Brewery: BREWERY X operations include brewing quality craft beer for offsite sales distribution, as
well as onsite sales in the tasting room. The operations area will include 46,609 square feet of area comprised
manufacturing area, storage, lobby, brewery offices, and employee break room. Beer Manufacturing will start at
4:00 am and conclude at 3:00 pm, daily (Brewer Shift). BREWERY X will manufacture craft beer by milling,
mashing, boiling, and fermenting, by use of a 15BBL brewhouse with approximately 10-30 fermentation vessels
ranging in size from 30BBL to 240BBL. BREWERY X’s goal will be able to produce up to 100,000 barrels of beer per
year. Our immediate 5-year plan includes a production run rate of 20,000 barrels in year one and up to 100,000
barrels in year five. The equipment that is needed to support the brewery process are a steam boiler, water
filtration, process glycol chiller, C02, compressed air and drainage. Production is predicate d on demand of local,
regional, national, international distribution demand as well as onsite/tap room demand. Brewing operations would
involve 5-8 employees with the potential to increase to 10-15 after several years of operations. All product not sold
in the Tasting Room will be sold and transported via a transportation company. Delivery trucks will be utilized for
raw materials as well as finished goods. The site currently has one (1) in-ground truck well. The truck well can
accommodate a full size 18-wheeler truck & trailer, as well as smaller trucks for logistical purposes for sales
distribution and raw material deliveries and departure. Hours for delivery are 4:00 am to 2:00 pm. All trips related
to the manufacturing operations (employees leaving or arriving, deliveries, etc.) shall not occur after 3:00pm .
Tasting Room: The tasting room consists of 7,126 square feet of space and is where patrons can enjoy Brewery
X beers brewed on-site and have food purchased from food trucks that would occasionally be staged at the rear of
the building. The Tasting Room would periodically have live music approximately 2-3 times a week from hours of
11 a.m. to 12 midnight. Non-alcoholic drink options for visitors will be available and sales of beer for both on and
off-premises consumption would be limited to the product brewed on site. BREWERY X intends to have games,
personal interactive environments, and activities for visitor's entertainment in the Tasting Room area. Additionally,
the tasting room will be an engaging, interactive environment meant to educate and share history of beer brewing
as well as offer an inviting, comfortable, peaceful venue to enjoy craft beers. The Tasting Room will also have TVs,
interactive displays, and a themed environment with adequate sound system for live and recorded music. Tasting
Room hours will be 11 am to 12 midnight, daily. The tasting room personnel will c onsist of 5 - 10 personnel to
support peak demands. The peak operations of the manufacturing and the tasting room have minimum hours of
operation overlap and it is anticipated that no more than 6-12 employees would be onsite at any given time.
BREWERY X is committed to the safety of its visitors and will have designated ride share options such as Lyft &
Uber drop off/pick up station at front of building outside the main entry door. Public Transportation provided by
The Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) provides bus stops along the La Palma Ave corridor, there is a bus
stop .01 mile or 1-2-minute walk to the brewery.
Outside Patio: The Outside Patio will be 990 sq. ft. located at the rear of the building and available for patrons
who want to extend their visit by being outside and overlooking the water view provided by the Anaheim Water
Treatment plant at the rear of the building. The patio will have lighting, outdoor furniture, and a fire pit. The patio
would periodically have live music which would begin Monday through Friday at 6:00 p.m. and end a half hour
prior to closing. On weekends music could begin at 11:00 am and end a half hour prior to closing.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Banquet Hall/Tasting Room Flex Space: The Flex Space will be 5,030 square feet located on the north side of
the building adjacent to the outside area and tasting room. The Flex Area will be used for private events (company
functions, special events, holiday periods, etc.). Private events would be for a maximum of 250 guests served by
12 employees or less. The area will have the ability to have live or recorded music. A section of the roof may be
removed or ability to be openable to create an outdoor feeling and experience. It will have the ability to have
closed doors to create a private event area. Operation hours will be as scheduled per event between the hours of
11:00 am to 12:00 am, the same as the Tasting Room. The “flex space” shall not be used as additional tasting
room on any weekday, prior to 6:00pm. Any amplified music will occur during the specified lived entertainment
hours for the tasting room, or when the roof is closed and all doors to the exterior of the building are closed.
Ongoing during project operations, the “flex space”, if used as a special event space, shall not have the event
begin or end between the hours of 4:00pm and 6:00pm, so as to not generate any vehicle trips during 4:00pm and
6:00pm.
Retail: There will be a 2,500 square foot retail area adjacent to the Tasting Room for BREWERY X P.O.S.
merchandise (hats, apparel, reach in coolers, growlers, brewery history displays, etc.). Retail area hours will mirror
the Tasting Room's hours.
Mezzanine: The existing building includes a second story mezzanine above the existing first floor office space.
The stairs will be walled off to prohibit access to this area. Brewery X does not intend to use or sublease this area
at this time.
Exterior Improvements: BREWERY X will improve the street scene of E. La Palma Ave, Anaheim by enhancing
the exterior facade. As indicated on the rendering, Brewery X intends to enhance the La Palma Ave street side of
the building with a mural and an architecturally integrated, illuminated signage consisting of a large "X" that would
be approximately 25' high (85 sq. ft. of surface space per code) - (see elevation rendering). There will be additional
signage on the front of building at approximately 4' high as indicated on the r endering (total of 55 sq. ft. of letter
surface space per code). Brewery X will also be installing one grain Silo on La Palma Ave on the west side of the
building. The mural artist for the enhancements will be by Penwal Industries’ design and creativity de partment. The
theme and concept of the murals will be consistent with the CUP exhibits submitted. The theme will be consistent
with Brewery history, equipment, ingredients, and the overall theme of the brewery industry. Please know that
extensive effort and costs will be spent to enhance an otherwise unbecoming building both inside and outside.
The BREWERY X team consists of industry professionals and successful business entrepreneurs. Brewery X intends
to hire local talent and partner with the community about the process of beer manufacturing by use of tours and
educational Q&A opportunities. The team will consist of management leadership, accounting, administration,
sales/marketing, HR, & brewers. Two of the team members are active police officers for the LAPD and Hawthorne
police departments. Another member of the Brewery X team owns
Penwal Industries, a turnkey design/build construction company that creates world class environments and has
worked on many projects in Anaheim. We estimate to immediately employ 8-10 team members, not all of which
will be onsite staff, for year 1. This number may shrink or grow depending on the needs of the business.
The BREWERY X environment will be engaging by ways of live/recorded music, games, outside area, themed
events as well as philanthropic events. Brewery X's team members are very active philanthropists with deep roots
in the local and surrounding cities. Locally, the owners are active in over 20 local philanthropies. One example is
'Operation Progress'; two of Brewery X's team members are founding members of this organization. The goal is to
create advantages and opportunities with success for the city's disadvantaged adults, kids and families within the
community. Their one-of-a-kind program has grown into an ecosystem of opportunity guiding students from
elementary school through college graduation. Philanthropy involvement includes: Watts Bears, 77th Street
Foundation, Operation Progress, Painted Turtle, Strive, All Eagles Oscar
City of Anaheim
INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
To: Nick Taylor/Planning Department
Case No.: DEV 2017-0011l1CUP 2017-05943
Brewery X
Date:
From:
3191 E. La Palma Avenue, Bldg. 251
March 28,2018
Lieutenant Brian McElhaney
Anaheim Police Department
Vice, Narcotics and Criminal Intelligence Section Commander
Contact: Name: Civilian Investigator Michele Irwin
Phone: 714-765-1461
Email: mmirwin@anaheim.net
The Police Department has reviewed the above case. Please see the following comments and
conditions for more information:
COMMENTS:
The Police Department has received an LD.C. Route Sheet for DEV 2017-001111CUP
2017-05943. The applicant is requesting to permit a brewery with a tasting room, banquet
room, and outdoor patio.
This location is within Census Tract Number 117.14 which has a population of 499. This
population allows for 0 on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there are
presently 7 licenses in the tract. It also allows for 0 off-sale licenses and there are
presently 3 licenses in the tract.
This location is within Reporting District 1432 which is 46% above the city average in
crime. There have been 6 calls for service to this location in the last year and they
consisted of: 4 burglary alarms, and 2 trespasses.
The l;4 mile radius surrounding this location is below the city average in crime. The calls
for service primarily consisted of: 18 petty thefts, 7 vandalisms, 3 auto thefts, and 3
simple assaults.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1.
The Police Department requests the following conditions be placed on the Conditional
Use Permit:
The business shall not be operated in such a way as
to be detrimental to the public health, safety, or Police Department
welfare.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
2. Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises
or on any adjacent area under the control of the Police Department
licensee shall be removed or painted over within
24 hours of beine a pplied.
3. Any and all security officers provided shall comply
with all State and Local ordinances regulating their Police Department
services, including, without limitation, Chapter 11.5
of Division 3 of the California Business and
Profession Code. (Section 4.16.070 Anaheim
Municip al Code)
4. Security measures shall be provided to the
satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department. Police Department
Such measures shall deter unlawful conduct of
employees and patrons, promote the safe and
orderly assembly and movement of persons and
vehicles, and prevent disturbances to the nearby
businesses.
5. Managers, owners, and wait staff need to call the
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and Police Department
obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and
Drugs Program) Training. The contact number is
714-558-4101. A similar program may be used as
long as it is certified and must be renewed.
6. There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor
minimum purchase required. Police Department
7. Signs shall be posted inside all patio doors stating
"No alcoholic beverages allowed past this point." Police Department
8. Hours of operation shall be: 11am to 12 midnight
Saturday and Sunday, and 6pm to midnight Police Department
Monday thru Friday. This includes the
banq uet/event room.
9. All entertainment must end a Y2 hour prior to
closing. This includes the banquet/event room. Police Department
10. That subject alcoholic beverage license shall not
be exchanged for a public premise (bar) type Police Department
license nor shall the establishment be operated as
a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the
Business and Professions Code.
11. Events in the banquet/event room must have food
catered by a restaurant with a caterer's permit. Police Department
12. Petitioner shall not share any profits, or pay any
percentage or commission to a promoter or any Police Department
other person, based upon monies collected as a
door charge, cover charge, or any other form of
admission charge, including minimum drink
orders, or the sale of drinks.
13.
14.
Individual signs shall be posted at all doors
leading to the outside stating "No alcohol allowed Police ~epartment
ast this oint."
Outdoor events will require a "Special Event
Permit" with four events allowed per year. Police Department
Concur: ----J<--~--O-+.:..---l---_+----
f:\home\mmirwin\CUP\2017-00111 DEV 3191 E La Palma Ave Brewery X.doc
N
O
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
N
O
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
N
O
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
N
O
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
NO
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
T
h
e
s
e
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
o
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
f
P
e
n
w
a
l
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
A
n
y
r
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
o
r
u
s
e
a
r
e
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
c
o
n
s
e
n
t
o
f
P
e
n
w
a
l
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
2
0
0
6
A
l
l
R
i
g
h
t
s
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
B
R
E
W
E
R
Y
X
-
0
1
4
2
2
3
1
"
=
5
0
'
3
-
2
2
-
1
8
4
2
2
3
-
B
R
E
W
E
R
Y
X
T
.
N
.
X
X
PARKING LAYOUT (DIMENSION)
DRAWING #1
PARKING LAYOUT (DIMENSION)
SCALE: 1"=50'
LA PALMA AVENUE
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
CONC. WALKWAY
LANDSCAPEDRIVEWAY
SIDEWALKSIDEWALK
TR
U
C
K
W
E
L
L
29 REGULAR PARKING 8'-6"x18'-0"
16
R
E
G
U
L
A
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
6
"
x
2
2
'
-
0
"
15 REGULAR PARKING 8'-6"x18'-0"
36
R
E
G
U
L
A
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
6
"
x
1
8
'
-
0
"
36
R
E
G
U
L
A
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
6
"
x
1
8
'
-
0
"
12
R
E
G
U
L
A
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
6
"
x
1
8
'
-
0
"
6
A
N
G
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
6
"
x
1
8
'
-
0
"
19 ANGLE PARKING 8'-6"x18'-0"
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
17 ANGLE PARKING 8'-6"x18'-0"
27 ANGLE PARKING 8'-6"x18'-0"
7 ADA 9'x18'-0"
BREWERY X
3191 E. LA PALMA AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92806
FO
O
D
T
R
U
C
K
PA
R
K
I
N
G
LANDSCAPE
B
r
e
w
e
r
y
X
,
I
N
C
.
3
1
9
1
E
.
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
,
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
6
B
r
e
w
e
r
y
X
(1) GRAIN
SILO
SEE SHT. BREWERY X-03
FOR BUILDING DETAIL
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
PE
R
P
E
N
D
I
C
U
L
A
R
/
R
E
G
U
L
A
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
:
1
4
4
AN
G
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
(
A
L
L
A
T
6
0
°
)
:
8
6
PA
R
A
L
L
E
L
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
:
5
AD
A
:
7
TO
T
A
L
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E
:
2
4
2
UBER
PICK UP
EX
I
S
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
RI
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
EX
I
S
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
R.
O
.
W
.
CI
T
Y
O
F
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
CA
N
Y
O
N
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
PL
A
N
(
O
P
T
I
O
N
B
)
TYP. ANGLE PARKING STALL
TYP. PERPENDICULAR
PARKING STALL
2'2'
4" LINE
(TYP.)
17
A
N
G
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
6
"
x
1
8
'
-
0
"
8 R
E
G
U
L
A
R
PA
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
6
"
x
2
2
'
-
0
"
8 R
E
G
U
L
A
R
PA
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
6
"
x
2
2
'
-
0
"
5 REGULAR
PARKING 8'-6"x22'-0"
4
P
A
R
A
L
L
E
L
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
0
"
x
2
2
'
-
0
"
1
P
A
R
A
L
L
E
L
PA
R
K
I
N
G
8
'
-
0
"
x
2
2
'
-
0
"
TYP. PARALLEL
PARKING STALL
18
'
8'-6"
1
8
'
8'-6"
2'2'
4" LI
N
E
(TYP
.
)
4" LINE
(TYP.)
22
'
8'
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE (PER
STANDARD DETAIL 115-B) NO
OBSTRUCTIONS
20
'
-
4
"
WASTE
CONTAINER
ORGANIC
COLLECTION
CART/BIN
CMU BLOCK
WASTE
ENCLOSURE
19
5
'
-
0
.
3
5
"
261'-9.22"
10
2
'
-
9
.
3
8
"
8
2
'
-
2
.
9
8
"
33
3
'
-
1
1
.
9
2
"
31
4
'
-
4
.
0
3
"
29
4
'
-
7
.
6
0
"
31
3
'
-
1
1
.
9
2
"
24'
24
'
24
'
25
'
-
1
1
"
48'-7.2753"
84
'
-
1
"
38
'
-
7
"
18'-6"
51
'
44
'
-
5
"
2
6
'
-
6
"
29'-8"
20'
-
1
"
24'
24'
22'30
'
10
'
19
'
-
3
"
20
'
18
'
28'-4"
18'-8"
53
'
43
'
LANDSCAPE
15'
37
'
-
6
"
R15'
30'
23'
-
7
"
8'
22
'
RIGHT AWAY
EXISTING
SIGN REMOVE 60
'
NO PARKING
30
'
18
'
30
'
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
4 223 NTS 2 -7-1 8 B REWERY X-03T.N.X X4223-BREWERY XBREWERY X 3191 E. LA PALMA AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92806 LA PALMA STREET ELEVATION DRAWING #3Brewery X, IN C .3 1 9 1 E. LA PALMA AVENUE ,A NAHEIM, CA 9280 6 Th ese ori g ina l conce p ts an d d esi g n are t h e so l e p ro p ert y of Brewer y X, Inc. An y re p ro d uctions or use ar e p rohibited without the writte n c onsent of Penwa l In d ustries,I nc.C o py ri g ht 2006 All Ri g hts Reserved.B rewer y X
(1
)
GR
A
I
N
S
I
LO
AR
E
A
S
I
G
N
S
I
Z
E
P
E
R
C
O
D
E
:
B :
(9 ) SQ
.
F
T
.
R:
(8 ) S
Q
.
F
T
.
E:
(6 ) S
Q
.
F
T
.
W:
(
1
3)
S
Q
.
F
T
.
E:
(6 ) SQ
.
F
T
.
R:
(8 ) SQ
.
F
T
.
Y:
(5 ) SQ
.
F
T
.
L ET
T
E
R
X
=
(85
) SQ
.
F
T
.
NO
T
E
:
3
0
2
S
Q
.
F
T
.
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
P
E
R
C
O
D
E
TO
T
A
L
P
R
O
P
OS
E
D
LE
T
T
E
R
=
(
14
0
)
SQ
.
F
T.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: APRIL 16, 2018
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05957
LOCATION: 195 West Center Street Promenade (Decades Bar & Grill)
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Randy Carillo of Rock of
the 80s, LLC and the property owner is Shaheen Sadeghi of Center of the Universe,
LLC.
REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to allow a
restaurant, bar with alcoholic beverage sales for on-site consumption, and live
entertainment in conjunction with a new bar and nightclub to be located within an
existing commercial building.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under
the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and
approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05957.
BACKGROUND: The restaurant and bar would occupy a 4,673 square foot
commercial suite within Center City at the northeast corner on Lemon Street and
Center Street Promenade. The property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial
and Downtown Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The General Plan designates this property
for Mixed Use land uses. Surrounding the property are commercial uses to the north
south east and west.
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
(ABC) Type 47 (On Sale General – Eating Place) license to permit the sale and
consumption of alcohol within the proposed bar and nightclub. A full service menu
would be available at all times. The bar and nightclub would operate Monday to
Wednesday from 10:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Thursday from 10:30 a.m. to 12:00 a.m.,
Friday and Saturday from 10:30 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., and Sunday from 10:30 a.m. to
12:00 a.m. Entertainment would include live bands, karaoke, DJs, and background
music seven days a week and would cease no later than 30 minutes prior to closing.
The entertainment would consist primarily of cover bands playing music from the
70s, 80s, and 90s, catering to a demographic of 30 years old and up. The applicant
proposes to construct an entry vestibule to minimize noise impacts to the
surrounding area, as well as other noise attenuation to the satisfaction of staff.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05957
April 16, 2018
Page 2 of 4
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional
use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the
following conditions exist:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by this code;
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow
the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to
either the particular area or health and safety;
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed,
if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the
City of Anaheim.
Conditional Use Permit: The Zoning Code requires a conditional use permit for bars and
nightclubs within the Downtown Mixed Use Overlay Zone in order to determine compatibility
with surrounding land uses. Staff believes the alcohol sales and entertainment in conjunction
with a full service restaurant would be not be detrimental to the surrounding businesses or
properties and would provide a convenience to area customers if the applicant operates the
business in a responsible manner and in compliance with the recommended conditions of
approval. These conditions include closing the bar and nightclub at 10 p.m. on Sunday,
prohibiting minors, under 21 years old, in the facility after 9:00 p.m., prohibiting any exterior
advertising of alcoholic beverages, requiring a separate Entertainment Permit to allow
entertainment and amplified music, and requiring ABC LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol
and Drugs) training for employees. There would be sufficient parking available in the Center
City parking structures through an existing license agreement between the property owner and
the Community and Economic Development Department. Further, the applicant proposes to
minimize potential noise impacts by installing sound attenuation measures, including an entry
vestibule to address potential concerns from the nearest resident, which are located
approximately 270 feet to the south on Lemon Street. All doors and windows would be required
to remain closed during live entertainment, and no live entertainment would be allowed on the
exterior patio.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05957
April 16, 2018
Page 3 of 4
Center City Vision: The Community Development Department has been instrumental in helping
the Anaheim community define the vision for downtown, as expressed in the Anaheim General
Plan. The City envisions a vibrant downtown area that includes high quality residential
development, thriving commercial activity, a pedestrian-friendly environment, and a unique
architectural identity that reflects the historic character of the Anaheim Colony Historic District.
The downtown area, which has been recently rebranded as “Center City”, is envisioned to be a
recognizable urban city center and a public place that is dense, livable, active, and diverse, while
capitalizing on existing infrastructure, new and existing amenities, historic features, and a mix of
residential/commercial and civic uses. These land use principles are also summarized in the
Anaheim General Plan Community Design Element and the Greater Downtown Guide for
Development. Center City is envisioned as a vibrant commercial area, but has been lacking
businesses that generate nighttime activity. The proposed bar and nightclub would activate
Center City in the nighttime and fulfill this need that has been absent for many years. Based on
these factors, staff believes that the proposed use would be compatible with the surrounding area
and recommends approval of the conditional use permit.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05957
April 16, 2018
Page 4 of 4
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the
effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within the Class 1, Existing
Facilities, Categorical Exemption. Class 1 consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor
alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no
expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. The proposed project is a
request to allow on-site sales and consumption of alcohol and live entertainment in conjunction
with a new restaurant and bar in an existing building tenant space that a previous restaurant
occupied. As such, the proposed project meets the criteria for a Class 1 categorical exemption.
Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations,
there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would
anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is
categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
CONCLUSION: The proposed alcohol for on-premise consumption and live entertainment in
conjunction with the proposed restaurant and bar would implement the Center City vision
described in the Anaheim General Plan Community Design Element and the Greater Downtown
Guide for Development. The recommended conditions of approval would ensure that the use
would not have an adverse impact on the surrounding land uses. Staff recommends approval of
this request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Nick Taylor Irma Huitron
Associate Planner Acting Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution
2. Letter of Request
3. Police Department Memorandum
4. Photographs
5. Site Plan and Floor Plan
6. Correspondence
C-G (DMU)DEV 2018-00015PARKING STRUCTURERETAIL
RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
C-GRETAIL
O-LOFFICES
C-G (DMU)MUSEUM
C-GCITY HALL
C-G (DMU)ANAHEIM ICE
C-G (DMU)OFFICES
C-G (DMU)RETAIL
C-G (DMU)RETAIL
C-G (DMU)CITY HALL
C-G (DMU)POST OFFICE
C-G (DMU)PARKING LOT
C-G (DMU)PARKING STRUCTURERETAIL
C-G (DMU)MIXED USE
C-G (DMU)MIXED USE95 DU
C-G (DMU)OFFICES
C-G (DMU)RETAILC-G (DMU)MIXED USE
C-G (DMU)RETAILC-G (DMU)MIXED USE
C-G (DMU)RETAILC-G (DMU)MIXED USE
C-G (DMU)RETAIL C-G (DMU)RETAIL
C-G (DMU)RETAIL
C-G (DMU)RETAIL
C-G (DMU)RETAIL
O-LCITY HALL
C-G (MU)MORTUARY
C-GSERVICE STATION
I (MU)APARTMENTS
C-GRELIGIOUS USE
C-G (DMU)ANAHEIM ICE
C-G (SABC)RELIGIOUS USERM-3 (SABC)DUPLEXRM-4RELIGIOUS USE
W B R O A D W A Y
S
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
W L I N C O L N A V E
E B R O A D W A Y
S
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
W O A K S T
S
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
S
C
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
E
S
T
E C E N T E R S T
N
C
L
A
U
D
I
N
A
S
T
N
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
W C E N T E R S T R E E T P R O M E N A D E
S
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
E . L I N C O L N A V E
N
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
W . B R O A D W A Y
N
.
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
N
.
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
E .B R O A D W A Y
S.
M
A
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R
A
V
E
W .LIN C O L N A V E
S
.
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
E . B R O A D W A Y
1 9 5 W e st Ce n t e r S t r e et Promenade
D E V N o . 2 0 1 8-00015
Subject Property APN: 037-011-54037-011-56037-011-57037-011-55
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Photo:Ma y 2 016
W B R O A D W A Y
S
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
W L I N C O L N A V E
E B R O A D W A Y
S
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
W O A K S T
S
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
S
C
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
E
S
T
E C E N T E R S T
N
C
L
A
U
D
I
N
A
S
T
N
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
W C E N T E R S T R E E T P R O M E N A D E
S
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
E . L I N C O L N A V E
N
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
W . B R O A D W A Y
N
.
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
N
.
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
E .B R O A D W A Y
S.
M
A
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R
A
V
E
W .L I N C O L N A V E
S
.
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
E . B R O A D W A Y
1 9 5 W e st Ce n t e r S t r e et Promenade
D E V N o . 2 0 1 8-00015
Subject Property APN: 037-011-54037-011-56037-011-57037-011-55
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Photo:Ma y 2 016
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2018-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2018-05957 TO PERMIT A TYPE 47 (ON-SALE GENERAL – EATING PLACE)
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2018-00015)
(195 WEST CENTER STREET PROMENADE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning
Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05957
to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages under a Type 47 (On-Sale General – Eating Place)
license issued by the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (herein
referred to as "ABC") for on-premises consumption in conjunction within a proposed restaurant,
bar, and nightclub with live entertainment located at 195 West Center Street Promenade, in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California. The proposed restaurant is located
within an existing commercial building on real property generally depicted on the map attached
hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05957 shall be referred to herein
collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and
WHEREAS, the Property is part of a 2.66-acre commercial retail building and parking
structure, which is located within the "MU" Mixed Use land use designation of the Anaheim
General Plan. The Property is located in the underlying “C-G” General Commercial Zone and
the "DMU" Downtown Mixed Use Overlay Zone and is subject to the zoning and development
standards contained in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) and 18.30 (Downtown Mixed Use
Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on April 16, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional
Use Permit No. 2018-05957 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in
connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, as the "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act
(Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning
Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those
generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the
repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities,
involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this
determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and
is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
- 2 - PC2018-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05957, does find
and determine the following:
1. The proposed request to permit the sale of alcohol for on-premises consumption and
live entertainment in conjunction with a proposed restaurant and bar in a commercial building is
an allowable use within the "C-G" General Commercial Zone under subsection .010 of Section
18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) and Subsection .020 of Section
18.30.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.30 (Downtown Mixed Use Overlay Zone) of the Code, subject to
a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General
Commercial and “DMU” Downtown Mixed Use Overlay Zone.
2. The Proposed Project would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the use of a
portion of the Property as a restaurant, bar and nightlub with incidential alcohol sales for on-site
consumption and live entertainment is compatible with the existing uses within the commercial
building and uses in the surrounding area, subject to the conditions of approval shown below.
3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the
Proposed Project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and
general welfare of the public because the Property is currently improved with a commercial retail
building and parking structure and no expansion to the building is proposed.
4. The traffic generated by permitting the sale of alcohol for on-premises consumption
and live entertainment in conjunction with a proposed restaurant and bar would not impose an
undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the
area because the traffic generated by the restaurant and nighclub would not conflict with peak
daytime hours of the surrounding office and retail uses in the vicinity.
5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05957 under the conditions
imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05957, contingent upon and subject to the conditions
of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
- 3 - PC2018-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B
attached hereto are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the
Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05957 in order to preserve the health, safety
and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to
complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the
Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning
Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies
the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code,
and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or
approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of
this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting
of April 16, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 4 - PC2018-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 16, 2018, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of April,
2018.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2018-***
- 6 - PC2018-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05957
(DEV2018-00015)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1 The bar, restaurant and nightclub shall be operated in accordance with
the Letter of Operation submitted as part of the application. Any
changes to the business operation described in the Letter of Operation
shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to
determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Operation and to
ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Live entertainment
shall be subject to a separate Entertainment Permit.
Planning and
Building Department
2 Sound attenuation shall be provided to minimize impacts on
surrounding residents and businesses to the satisfaction of the Planning
and Building Director and the Chief of Police. All doors and windows
shall remain closed when there is any live entertainment or amplified
sound.
Planning and
Building Department
Police Department
3 The restaurant, bar and nightclub shall become a 21 and over only
venue after 9:00 p.m. Proper identification shall be checked by
security staff at the door.
Police Department
4 Entertainment shall stop 30 minutes prior to closing each day of the
week.
Police Department
5 Entertainment provided shall not be audible beyond the area under the
control of the licensee.
Police Department
6 Entertainment of any kind shall not be allowed in the outdoor patio
area.
Police Department
7 Parking within the adjacent parking structure shall be on a pre-pay
system and the gate open for exit on evenings with entertainment.
Police Department
8 There shall be no outside promoters used. Police Department
9 Bottle Service is not allowed. Police Department
10 At all times when the premise is open for business, the premise shall
be maintained as a bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu
containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant.
Police Department
- 7 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
11 Parking lots, driveways, circulation areas, aisles, passageways,
recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings, shall be provided with
enough lighting to illuminate and make clearly visible the presence of
any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and
provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and
vehicles onsite.
Police Department
12 There shall be no exterior advertising of any kind or type, including
advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or
indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages.
Police Department
13 Hours of Operation shall be: Monday – Wednesday to 9:00 p.m.,
Thursday to midnight, Friday and Saturday to 2:00 a.m., and Sunday
to 10:00 p.m.
Police Department
14 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim
Police Department to prevent disturbances to the nearby
neighborhood.
Police Department
15 A security plan shall be submitted to the Police Department for review
and approval prior to opening. The Plan shall be kept on file.
Police Department
16 The business shall not employ or permit any persons to solicit or
encourage others, directly or indirectly, to buy them drinks in the
licensed premises under any commission, percentage, salary, or other
profit-sharing plan, scheme or conspiracy. (Section 24200.5 Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act)
Police Department
17 Managers / Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage
Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs
Program) Training for themselves and service employees. The number
is 714-558-4101.
Police Department
18 Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent
area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over
within 24 hours of being applied.
Police Department
19 The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the
area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as
depicted.
Police Department
20 The maximum occupancy shall not exceed 275 persons. Signs
indicating the occupant load shall be posted in a conspicuous place on
an approved sign near the main exit from the room. (Section 25.114(a)
Uniform Fire Code)
Police Department
- 8 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
21 The door(s) and windows shall be kept closed any time there is
entertainment except in cases of emergency. Said door(s) not to
consist solely of a screen or ventilated security door.
Police Department
22 The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises shall
be prohibited.
Police Department
23 The business owner shall patrol the area under their control in an effort
to prevent the loitering of persons about the premises.
Police Department
24 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to
the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion
through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or
debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any
adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or
painted over within 24 hours of being applied.
Planning and
Building Department,
Code Enforcement
Division
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
25 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and
its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to
individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all
claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees
concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or
determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to
determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition
attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to
include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded
against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or
litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs,
liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with
such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
26 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the
issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits
for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall
result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the
revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
27 The subject Property shall be developed, used and maintained
substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to
the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with
the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
DECADES BAR & GRILL
195 Center Street Promenade
Anaheim, CA 92805
County of Orange
(714) 235-8851
www.decadesoc.com
Rock of the 80’s, LLC
prepared December, 2017
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Decades Bar & Grill
Decades will be a unique and upbeat destination for patrons wanting a dining experience
like no other. Guests will be transported to an era where they can relive their youth or
experience fun times of decades past; enjoying the music, art, and flair of different
decades of music and style. During the day, business people and families will be able to
enjoy amazing reasonably priced food in an upscale environment. On select weekend
evenings, patrons will get to listen to and dance to amazing bands like Berlin, Missing
Persons, English Beat, Wild Cherry, A Flock of Seagulls, Tiffany, and many others. We
will also have very popular cover bands like Flux Capacitor and Total Recall as well as
great DJ’s playing tunes from the 70’s, 80’s, and 90’s. It will not uncommon to see the
likes of world famous personality, Richard Blade and his wife spinning music and
hanging out at Decades. Our key demographic for evening entertainment is 30 and
above. Our business focus has proven extremely successful in bringing bands that bring
fun and good times without the problems experienced at other venues.
Decades will add even more fun and flair to the Anaheim Promenade Experience. We
will act as an anchor that will bring even more foot traffic to the Promenade. We will help
create an environment where patrons will also visit other businesses for their unique
offerings. We believe we will be a synergistic partner for other businesses and residents
in the area.
Key points:
Experience:
o Our founder has over 24 years of business experience:
14 years with the Walt Disney Company:
Location Supervisor
Test and Adjust team for new attractions
Special Operations
Over 10 years experience in restaurant and retail ownership /
operations including 6 years as a founder and partner in 3
successful 80’s Bars:
Concept and development lead
Management of construction and buildout for all locations
General Manager of Operations
Hours of operation:
o Mon. - Wed. 10:30 am - 9:00 pm
o Thur. 10:30 am - 12:00 am
o Fri. / Sat. 10:30 am - 2:00 am
o Sun. 10:30 am - 12:00 am
Food:
o A blend of health conscious American and mixed cuisine.
Environment:
o Establish high end decor while including paintings, pictures, and video
clips of pop icons, movies, and reminders of decades past.
o Music and videos of relevant eras.
o Energetic staff members that engage our guests providing a memorable
experience.
Entertainment:
o Mon. - Wed.
10:30 am - Closing: Background music and selected quotes
from popular movies and personalities.
o Thur.
10:30 am - 8:00 pm: Background music and selected quotes from
popular movies and personalities.
8:00 pm - Closing: Karaoke
o Fri. / Sat.
10:30 am - 8:00 pm: Background music and selected quotes from
popular movies and personalities.
8:00 pm - Closing: Bands, DJ, or background music.
o Sun.
10:30 am - 8:00 pm: Background music and selected quotes from
popular movies and personalities.
8:00 pm - Closing: Bands, DJ, or background music.
Good neighbor measures and good business practices:
o Decades promotes a fun and safe atmosphere. Our restaurant attracts
family oriented guests, and business professionals during the day and a
mature crowd on select entertainment evenings.
o Our landlord who is also the city’s development partner for the area fully
supports our concept. He believes Decades will make a positive impact
for the businesses and residents of the Promenade and surrounding
area.
o Our location formerly had successful restaurants/bars with live
entertainment, that helped maintain customers during evening hours for
the other businesses. We have spoken with other tenants in the area
who are very excited to see Decades open. They believe we will help
revitalize their evening business.
o Decades will have high levels of employee staffing to ensure high levels
of service and guest satisfaction.
o A Senior Manager will always be on duty.
o Due to our customer demographics and the focus of our entertainment
model, our business will not have the issues other venues attract.
o On nights with Karaoke, live entertainment, or DJ, only adults over the
age of 21 will be permitted after 9 pm.
o We will be charging a cover charge only on Fri. and Sat. evenings after
7:00 pm.
o Our kitchen will remain open until 1 hour before closing every day even
on entertainment nights.
o Patio dining will be open during regular business hours, except during
hours of scheduled entertainment.
o During entertainment hours, our fenced in patio area will be available to
guests to have a quieter area to socialize. Volume levels will be
monitored by our security staff.
o Our sound and lighting system is world class. Through intelligent design
we are employing directional sound placement in order to keep outside
sound at a reasonable level.
o We have a well known and skilled sound engineer on staff who has
already began to analyze and create measures to help mitigate outside
sound. We are even removing the existing ceiling tiles to create a pocket
to dampen sound.
o We are also exploring modern noise reduction techniques on the interior
of the location.in order to reduce exterior volume.
o Our managers, bartenders, servers, and security staff are trained to
promote responsible alcohol consumption and promote the welfare of our
guests. They are also required to have Responsible Beverage Service
Certification.
o We will work with services like UBER and LYFT to seek promotions and
discounts for guests.
o On nights with entertainment we will have a full security staff. Our
security guards are employees of Decades and are all trained and
appropriately licensed and regulated by the State of California Bureau of
Security and Investigative Services. Additionally, all security personnel
are required to possess “Responsible Beverage Service
Certification.” Current records of certificates and training for security staff
members are kept on premise. These documents will be made available
for immediate review by the Anaheim Police Department and Community
Development Department.
o While most restaurants with bars have 1 security guard for every 100
guests, we average 1 security guard for every 50 guests. Additionally,
security staff arrives at 7:00 pm. A security guard will also be stationed
outside the front door to monitor incoming guests.
o All management and security personnel will have 2 way radios and
earpieces to ensure reliable communication. We promote a safe
environment for our guests and employees. Our goal is to be proactive in
identifying and addressing potential issues before they evolve.
o For 30 minutes before and 30 minutes after closing, security personnel
shall be stationed outside the premises to assist and encourage patrons
to leave safely.
o Hand-held capacity counters shall be used by staff at the entrance at all
times during entertainment hours.
o Security staff will take “Reasonable Steps” to discourage and correct
objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance on the sidewalks and
immediate areas surrounding the business if directly related to the
patrons of Decades.
o We conduct an operations and security debrief with our staff at the end of
the evening for continual improvement and efficiency.
o In order to enhance safety and security, high-definition security cameras
are positioned in the interior and exterior of the restaurant.
o During entertainment hours, all exterior doors and windows will be closed
except to allow ingress or egress of patrons, or in case of emergencies.
Doors will be equipped with 10 second self-closers in order to mitigate
sound.
o Decades intends to remain fully compliant with all local, state, and federal
regulations. The owners wish to ensure a safe and enjoyable environment
for employees and guests alike.
City of Anaheim
INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
To: Nick Taylor/Planning Department
Case No.: DEV 2018-00015
Decades Bar & Grill
195 W. Center Street Promenade
Date: March 1, 2018
From: Lieutenant Brian McElhaney
Anaheim Police Department
Vice, Narcotics and Criminal Intelligence Section Commander
Contact: Name: Civilian Investigator Michele Irwin
Phone: 714-765-1461
Email: mmirwin@anaheim.net
The Police Department has reviewed the above case. Please see the following comments and
conditions for more information:
COMMENTS: Public Convenience and Necessity Information:
The Police Department has received an I.D.C. Route Sheet for DEV 2018-00015. The
applicant is a restaurant/lounge with a Type 47 full alcohol, live entertainment, DJ,
karaoke, and dancing.
The location is in Census Tract Number 873 which has a population of 10,413. This
population allows for 11 on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there are
presently 20 licenses in the tract. It also allows for 6 off-sale licenses and there is
presently 5 licenses in the tract.
This location is within Reporting District 1625 which is 262% above the city average in
crime. There has been 1 call for service to this location in the last year and it was for
trespassing.
The ¼ mile radius surrounding this location is 304% above the city average in crime.
The calls for service primarily consisted of: 97 petty thefts, 40 vandalisms, 26 auto
burglaries, and 26 drug abuse violations.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
The Police Department requests the following conditions be placed on the Conditional
Use Permit:
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
No. Timing Condition Responsible
Department
1.
Decades will become a 21 and over only venue
after 9:00pm. ID will be checked at the door. Police Department
2.
Entertainment shall stop ½ hour prior to closing
each day of the week. Police Department
3.
Entertainment provided shall not be audible
beyond the area under the control of the
licensee.
Police Department
4.
Entertainment of any kind shall not be allowed in
the patio area. Police Department
5.
Parking shall be on a pre-pay system and the
gate open for exit on evenings with
entertainment.
Police Department
6.
There shall be no outside promoters used.
Police Department
7.
Bottle Service is not allowed.
Police Department
8.
At all times when the premise is open for
business, the premise shall be maintained as a
bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu
containing an assortment of foods normally
offered in such restaurant.
Police Department
9.
There shall be no exterior advertising of any kind
or type, including advertising directed to the
exterior from within, promoting or indicating the
availability of alcoholic beverages.
Police Department
10.
Parking lots, driveways, circulation areas, aisles,
passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous
to buildings, shall be provided with enough
lighting to illuminate and make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises
during the hours of darkness and provide a safe,
secure environment for all persons, property,
and vehicles onsite.
Police Department
11.
Hours of Operation shall be: Monday –
Wednesday to 9:00pm, Thursday to midnight,
Friday and Saturday to 2:00am, and Sunday to
10:00pm.
Police Department
12.
Security measures shall be provided to the
satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department to
prevent disturbances to the nearby
neighborhood.
Police Department
13.
A security plan shall be submitted to the Police
Department for review and approval prior to
opening. The Plan shall be kept on file.
Police Department
14.
The business shall not employ or permit any
persons to solicit or encourage others, directly or
indirectly, to buy them drinks in the licensed
premises under any commission, percentage,
Police Department
salary, or other profit-sharing plan, scheme or
conspiracy. (Section 24200.5 Alcoholic Beverage
Control Act)
15.
Managers / Owners need to call the Department
of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD
(Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs
Program) Training for themselves and service
employees. The number is 714-558-4101.
Police Department
16.
Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises
or on any adjacent area under the control of the
licensee shall be removed or painted over within
24 hours of being applied.
Police Department
17.
The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for
maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the
premises over which they have control, as
depicted.
Police Department
18.
The maximum occupancy shall not exceed 275
persons. Signs indicating the occupant load
shall be posted in a conspicuous place on an
approved sign near the main exit from the room.
(Section 25.114(a) Uniform Fire Code)
Police Department
19.
The door(s) and windows shall be kept closed
any time there is entertainment except in cases
of emergency. Said door(s) not to consist solely
of a screen or ventilated security door.
Police Department
20.
The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption
off the premises shall be prohibited. Police Department
21.
Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their
control in an effort to prevent the loitering of
persons about the premises.
Police Department
Concur:
Office of Chief of Police
f:\home\mmirwin\CUP\2018-00015 DEV 195 W Center Street Promenade Decades.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
W. SANTA ANA ST.
W. ELM ST
W. BROADWAY
W. CENTER ST. PROMENADE
W. OAK ST.
LINCO
L
N
A
V
E
N.
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
.
S.
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
.
N.
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
.
SCALE
1/16” = 1’T1VICINITY MAP
BUILDING INFORMATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
SCOPE OF WORK
SHEET INDEX
PARKING DATA:
SHEET NUMBER
BUSINESS OWNER:
SH
E
E
T
T
I
T
L
E
SI
T
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
DELTA REASON DATE
CO
V
E
R
S
H
E
E
T
GE
N
E
R
A
L
I
N
F
O
SI
T
E
P
L
A
N
T1 - COVER SHEET / GENERAL INFO / SITE PLAN
A1-E - FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING
A1-D - FLOOR PLAN - DEMO
A1-P - FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED
PH-1 - PHOTO SHEET
A.P.N. _____________
OCCUPANCY GROUP: B
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B
NUMBER OF STORIES: 1
SPRINKLERS: YES
UNIT AREA (EXISTING): 5 ,285 S.F.
PROPOSED T.I. AREA: 350 S.F.
OWNERS ARE PROPOSING THE APPROVAL THE
APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
NEW BAR & GRILL TO BE NAMED
“DECADES BAR & GRILL”.
THE C.U.P. WILL COVER
- BEER, WINE & SPIRITS,
- LIVE ENTERTAINMENT (UP TO 10 PC. BANDS)
- SINGLE LIVE PERFORMER
- DJ / KARAOKE
- DANCING
- STAGE
THERE WILL BE MINOR T.I. IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS
REMOVAL OF NON-BEARING WALL(S) & CEILING
AREAS. THIS WILL BE DONE TO GIVE THE INTERIOR
OF THE BUSINESS A MORE OPEN, UPDATED AND
PLEASING AMBIANCE FOR OUR CLIENTS THAT THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM WILL BE PROUD OF AND ENJOY
FOR YEARS TO COME.
MINOR ELECTRICAL, REFINISHING OF
BATHROOMS, AS WELL AS INTERIOR PAINTING AND
FINISHING. AN ADDITIONAL EXIT DOOR(S) WILL BE
INSTALLED FOR EMERGENCY EGRESS AND A
VESTIBULE/BUFFER AREA WILL BE ADDED TO REDUCE
NOISE LEAKING OUT TO THE SIDEWALK/ENTRANCE
AREA AS WELL AS A STAGE AND “GREEN ROOM”.
THERE WILL BE NO CHANGES TO THE KITCHEN
AND/OR PREP AREAS. OWNERS WILL BE SUBMITTING
PLANS TO THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT
FOR INSPECTION AND APPROVAL.
**
**
BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
:
1
DATE: 02/03/2018
SCALE: AS NOTED
JOB #:
DRAWN BY: JAD
2
3
4
5
SITE PLAN
APPLICABLE BUILDING STANDARDS:
2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC)
2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (TITLE 24, PART 6)
2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)
2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC)
2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC)
2016 CALGREEN STANDARDS
D E S I G N E R:
JACK DEROSAS
2404 E. KATELLA AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92867
D
E
C
A
D
E
S
B
A
R
&
G
R
I
L
19
5
W
E
S
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
S
T
.
PR
O
M
E
N
A
D
E
AN
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
DECADES BAR & GRIL
195 WEST CENTER ST.
PROMENADE
ANHEIM, CA
S.
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
.
W. OAK ST.
W. CENTER ST. PROMENADE
ADJACENT MULTI-LEVEL PARKING
STRUCTURE TO BE USTILIZED
EXIST.MULTI-LVLPARKINGSTRUCTURE
ACCESSIBLE (ADA)PARKING IS PROVIDEDON THE GROUND LEVELOF THE EXISTING MULITI-LEVELPARKING STRUCTURE
EXIST.STAIRS &ELEVATOR(S)FORPARKINGSTRUCTURE
EXIST.
PATIO
SIDEWALK
WALKWAY
TURFTURF
TUR
F
SIDEWALK
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
21
’
-
0
6
”
9
’
-
0
6
”
11
6
’
-
0
6
”
17
8
’
-
0
6
”
29
’
-
0
6
”
PARKING
DRIVEWAY
PR
O
J
E
C
T
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
SCALEFLOOR PLAN - EXISTING
L E G E N D D OOR SC HEDULE
- ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNAGE (See Notes)
1/4” = 1’ 0”
3°/7° ENTRY DOOR w/PANIC BAR
3°/7° H.C. DOOR w/PRIVACY LOCK , w/LEVER LOCK / SELF CLOSER
3°/7° H.C. DOOR w/PRIVICY LOCK
/7° H.C. DOOR w/PRIVICY LOCK
/7° H.C. DOOR w/PRIVICY LOCK
A
B
C
SHEET
OF S HEETS
BUSINES S O WNER:
SH
E ET
T
I
T
L
E
SI
T
E
L
O
C
A
TI
O
N
F
L
OO
R
P
L
A
N
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
:
DAT E:
SC ALE: AS NOTED
JOB #:
DRAWN BY: JAD
A1-E
- ADA ACCESSABLE SEATING
30” X 48” MIN.
1 PER 20 SEATS
D E S I G N E R:
JACK DEROSAS
2404 E. KATELLA AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92867
(714) 561-2059
- EXIST. WALL
NOTE: - ALL DOORS WILL HAVE A MAX 1/2” THRESHOLD
N OTE: - A LL DOOR HARDWARE SHALL BE 34” MINIMUM AND 44” MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR[2013 CBC 11B-404.2.7]
- DOOR HANDLES, LOCKS AND OTHE R OPERABLE PARTS SHALL BE
- DOOR HARDWARE SHALL BE A MIN. OF 34” AND A MAX. OF 44”
ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR.
BE OPERABLE WITH ONE HAND AND NOT REQ UIRE RIGHT GRASPING,
PINCHING, OR TWIS TING OF THE WRIST AN D THE FORCE TO ACTIVATE
OPERA BLE PARTS SHA LL BE 5 POUNDS MAX. [2013 CBC 11B-404.2.7]
[2013 CBC 11B-404.2.3]
D
E
C
A
D
E
S
B
A
R
&
G
R
I
L
19
5
W
E
S
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
S
T
.
PR
O
M
E
N
A
D
E
AN
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
DECADES BAR & GRIL
195 WEST CENTER ST.
PROMENADE
ANHEIM, CA
PATIO
AREA
FO
L
D
D
O
W
N
CH
A
N
G
I
N
G
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
FOLD DOWNCHANGING STATION
3
0
”
3
0
”
39”
60
”
R
60
”
R
115’-08”
9’-08”
16
’
-
0
6
”
12
’
-
0
5
”
18
’
-
0
8
”
12’-00”73’-03”27’-05”3’
8’-06”18’-00”15’-06”8’-03” 8’-03”39’-06”
OFFICEELECTRICAL
ROOM
UTILITYROOM WALK-INREFRIDGE.WALK-INFREEZR
KITCHENAREA 1 KITCHENAREA 2
(E) WOMENS
MAIN BAR
MAIN BARAREA
(E) MENS
KITCHENAREA 3
KITCHENAREA 4
48
’
-
0
4
”
39”
SERVER
STATION
SCALEFLOOR PLAN - DEMO
L E G E N D
1/4” = 1’ 0”
SHEET
OF S HEETS
BUSINES S O WNER:
SH
E ET
T
I
T
L
E
SI
T
E
L
O
C
A
TI
O
N
F
L
OO
R
P
L
A
N
DE
M
O
BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
:
DAT E:
SC ALE: AS NOTED
JOB #:
DRAWN BY: JAD
A1-D
- DEMO WALL
D E S I G N E R:
JACK DEROSAS
2404 E. KATELLA AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92867
(714) 561-2059
- PROP. WALL
- EXIST. WALL
NOTE: - ALL DOORS WILL HAVE A MAX 1/2” THRESHOLD
N OTE: - A LL DOOR HARDWARE SHALL BE 34” MINIMUM AND 44” MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR[2013 CBC 11B-404.2.7]
- DOOR HANDLES, LOCKS AND OTHE R OPERABLE PARTS SHALL BE
- DOOR HARDWARE SHALL BE A MIN. OF 34” AND A MAX. OF 44”
ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR.
BE OPERABLE WITH ONE HAND AND NOT REQ UIRE RIGHT GRASPING,
PINCHING, OR TWIS TING OF THE WRIST AN D THE FORCE TO ACTIVATE
OPERA BLE PARTS SHA LL BE 5 POUNDS MAX. [2013 CBC 11B-404.2.7]
[2013 CBC 11B-404.2.3]
WALLS
TO BE
DEMO’D
D
E
C
A
D
E
S
B
A
R
&
G
R
I
L
19
5
W
E
S
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
S
T
.
PR
O
M
E
N
A
D
E
AN
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
DECADES BAR & GRIL
195 WEST CENTER ST.
PROMENADE
ANHEIM, CA
PATIO AREA
FO
L
D
D
O
W
N
CH
A
N
G
I
N
G
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
FOLD DOWNCHANGING STATION
3
0
”
3
0
”
39”
60
”
R
60
”
R
115’-08”
9’-08”
16
’
-
0
6
”
12
’
-
0
5
”
18
’
-
0
8
”
12’-00”73’-03”27’-05”3’
8’-06”18’-00”15’-06”8’-03” 8’-03”7’-00”32’-00”
STORAGE
ELECTRICALROOM
UTILITY
ROOM
WALK-IN
REFRIDGE.WALK-INFREEZR
KITCHENAREA 1 KITCHENAREA 2
(P)SERVICEBAR
(E) WOMENS
MAIN BAR
MAIN BARAREA
VESTIBULE
SOUNDBUFFER
DINING
AREA
(E) MENS
KITCHENAREA 3
48
’
-
0
4
”
8’
39”
SCALEFLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED
L E G E N D D OOR SC HEDULE
- ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNAGE
1/4” = 1’ 0”
3°/7° DOUBLE TEMPERED GLAZED
ENTRY DOORS w/PANIC BAR
3°/7° TEMPERED GLASS ENTRY DOOR w/PANIC BAR
3°/68 PRIVACY DOOR w/PUSH PLATE & INSIDE HANDLE
TO REMAIN UNLOCKED AT ALL TIMES
3°/68 PRIVACY DOOR w/LEVER LOCK
36/68 MAN DOOR w/LOCK
3°/68 MAN DOOR w/PANIC BAR
3°/7° H.C. DOOR w/PRIVACY LOCK , w/LEVER LOCK / SELF CLOSER
A
B
C
D
E
F
SHEET
OF S HEETS
BUSINES S O WNER:
SH
E ET
T
I
T
L
E
SI
T
E
L
O
C
A
TI
O
N
F
L
OO
R
P
L
A
N
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
1
BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
:
DAT E: 03-11-2018
SC ALE: AS NOTED
JOB #:
DRAWN BY: JAD
A1-P
1 PER 20 SEATS
D E S I G N E R:
JACK DEROSAS
2404 E. KATELLA AVE.
ORANGE, CA 92867
(714) 561-2059
- PROP. WALL
- EXIST. WALL
NOTE: - ALL DOORS WILL HAVE A MAX 1/2” THRESHOLD
N OTE: - A LL DOOR HARDWARE SHALL BE 34” MINIMUM AND 44” MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR[2013 CBC 11B-404.2.7]
- DOOR HANDLES, LOCKS AND OTHE R OPERABLE PARTS SHALL BE
- DOOR HARDWARE SHALL BE A MIN. OF 34” AND A MAX. OF 44”
ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR.
BE OPERABLE WITH ONE HAND AND NOT REQ UIRE RIGHT GRASPING,
PINCHING, OR TWIS TING OF THE WRIST AN D THE FORCE TO ACTIVATE
OPERA BLE PARTS SHA LL BE 5 POUNDS MAX. [2013 CBC 11B-404.2.7]
[2013 CBC 11B-404.2.3]
D
E
C
A
D
E
S
B
A
R
&
G
R
I
L
19
5
W
E
S
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
S
T
.
PR
O
M
E
N
A
D
E
AN
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
DECADES BAR & GRIL
195 WEST CENTER ST.
PROMENADE
ANHEIM, CA
OCCUPANCY
TOTAL
AREA SF OCC#
UTILITY RM
KITCHEN
BAR AREA
BATHROOMS
FOYER
DINING
TEMP. STAGE AREA
GREEN RM
PATIO
159.5
825
1368
384
56
1,451.5
351
78
612.5
5,285
4
6
105
8
4
92
7
5
41
275
PATIO AREA
FO
L
D
D
O
W
N
CH
A
N
G
I
N
G
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
FOLD DOWNCHANGING STATION
STAGERAILING
3
0
”
3
0
”
39”
60
”
R
60
”
R
115’-08”
9’-08”
16
’
-
0
6
”
12
’
-
0
5
”
18
’
-
0
8
”
12’-00”73’-03”27’-05”3’
8’-06”18’-00”15’-06”8’-03” 8’-03”7’-00”32’-00”
(P)TEMPORARYSTAGE
STORAGE
ELECTRICALROOM
UTILITYROOM WALK-INREFRIDGE.
14 X 30AREA
DAYTIMEDINING
-EVENINGDANCE FLOOR
WALK-INFREEZR
KITCHENAREA 1 KITCHENAREA 2
(P)SERVICEBAR
(E) WOMENS
MAIN BAR
MAIN BARAREA
VESTIBULESOUNDBUFFER
DININGAREA
(E) MENS
KITCHENAREA 3
(P)
GRNRM
48
’
-
0
4
”
7’.00”
10
’
-
0
6
”
25
’
-
0
6
”
8’
39”
E
X
I
T
EXIT
EX
I
T
EX
I
T
E
X
I
T
E
X
I
T
1
Elly Morris
From:Rocelle Fernandez <rocellefernandez@yahoo.com>
Sent:Sunday, April 08, 2018 11:51 AM
To:Nicholas J. Taylor
Subject:Night club by Anaheim Promenade
Hello,
I live close by this area. I have seen drunk drivers hit the Arco gas station sign on Broadway and Anaheim. Putting a
nightclub near the center street area would bring more of these type of weekend partiers. This is not downtown
Fullerton and I don't want to see crowds of drunks driving around our area. I have a friend that lives in the new
Alexan The Aspect apartment complex in Fullerton right next to the In Cahoots club. Every I think Saturday or Sunday
they have Mexican Club music and the other days Country music. One of those days a group of Hispanic man were
kicked out of the club. They returned and open fired outside right by her patio towards In Cahoots. On country night
the crowd leaves trash around the area and just act like loud drunks. I don't want that crowd here. I have seen
people get in horrible accidents by my street on Olive and Lincoln because they run the red light. I have only lived
here for about 2 years and have seen 3 accidents and 2 deaths. One was a motorcycle who was hit. Anaheim has
gotten better a long the years and I've lived in the city for 10 years. We could do more improvements but let's not go
backwards.
Sent from my iPhone
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: APRIL 16, 2018
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2005-00008
LOCATION: The property is located at 1404 East Katella Avenue and consists of
approximately 43.1-acres generally located west of State College Boulevard between
Katella Avenue and Gene Autry Way (referred to as “A-Town”).
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is PT
Metro, LLC, and the applicant’s representative is Donna Mathiasen (collectively
referred to as the “Applicant).
REQUEST: The Applicant is requesting an amendment to Amended and Restated
Development Agreement No. 2005-00008 (“Development Agreement”) to amend the
Exhibit “G” Term Extension Milestones relative to the timing and completion of
residential units within the 5-year and 7.5-year anniversary periods.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt
the attached resolution recommending approval to City Council of Amendment No.
1 to the Development Agreement for the A-Town Project to modify the project
milestones in Exhibit “G”, and determining that this modification is not a substantial
change that requires subsequent environmental review as Subsequent Environmental
Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, along
with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321, together with other previously approved
environmental documentation, remain relevant and informative.
BACKGROUND: In October 2005, the City Council approved Development
Agreement No. 2005-00008 for the A-Town Metro Project, a 43-acre mixed-use
development located between Katella Avenue and Gene Autry Way, west of State
College Boulevard, near the center of the Platinum Triangle. When originally
approved, the A-Town Metro Project was entitled for up to 2,681 residential units;
150,000 square feet of commercial uses; two public parks; and, a network of local
streets.
In October of 2015, the City Council approved Amended and Restated Development
Agreement No. 2005-00008 (“Development Agreement”), which revised and
renamed the previously approved A-Town Metro Project to the A-Town Project. The
Development Agreement allows the construction of a mixed-use development
consisting of between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000 and 50,000
square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets.
Figure No. 1, on the following page, shows the general layout and conceptual
development of the A-Town Project.
A-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
April 16, 2018
Page 2 of 6
Figure No. 1: A-Town Project General Layout and Conceptual Development
Development Underway
The Applicant has proceeded with development of the A-Town Project since the approval of the
Development Agreement in 2015. These actions include the recordation of Tract Map No.
17703; rough grading the site; street improvements for Westside Drive, Market Street, and
portions of Meridian Street; backbone utility installations; and construction of the 400-unit
apartment project in Development Area A, with completion anticipated in August 2018.
Final Site Plan Applications – Development Areas G and H
In addition to construction of the apartment project in Development Area A, the Applicant has
submitted Conceptual Development Review applications for Development Areas G and H in
March of 2018, as part of the Final Site Plan Application processes for the residential
development of both sites. Together, the total number of residential units proposed in
Development Areas G and H, exceed 150 units and will most likely yield over 200 units,
conservatively. Staff anticipates that the Planning Commission will review the Final Site Plan
Applications for Development Areas G and H in late 2018 or early 2019.
A-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
April 16, 2018
Page 3 of 6
Street Dedications / Acquisition and Funding Agreement
As part of the A-Town Project, including both the original (2005) and amended (2015) plans,
street dedications have been required and were dedicated by the property owner to allow for the
ultimate improvements of Katella Avenue, State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way per the
Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan. The dedications are subject to reimbursement pursuant
to the A-Town Project’s Acquisition and Funding Agreement with the City of Anaheim
Community Facilities District No. 08-1 (“CFD”). Potentially, $1,355,153.73 in reimbursement
for right-of-way dedications could be due to the property owner from the City as certain
conditions of the agreement are met.
PROPOSAL: The Development Agreement includes Term Extension Milestones that allow for
extensions of the term of the Development Agreement, based on the delivery of various project
improvements, residential units and commercial ground floor space. These milestones and term
extensions provide for the development of the A-Town Project over a 20-year period. These
Term Extension Milestones are Exhibit “G” of the Development Agreement, which is included
as Attachment 3 to this report, and below in Table No. 1.
The Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Development Agreement to amend the Exhibit
“G” Term Extension Milestones relative to the timing and completion of residential units within
the 5-year term and subsequent 5-year extension periods. The request would modify the
milestones required by the 5-year Anniversary Date and create a new 7.5-year Anniversary Date.
The milestones would continue to permit the development of the A-Town Project over a 20-year
period, if the Applicant meets the subject milestones. The proposed Exhibit “G” is included as
Attachment 4 to this report and in Table No. 1 on the following page. Table No. 1 compares the
existing and proposed milestones. The text in underlined bold italic print in Table No. 1
indicates change from existing development agreement.
In conjunction with the Applicant’s proposed amendment to the Development Agreement, and at
the City’s request, the parties are willing to amend the A-Town Project’s Acquisition and
Funding Agreement to phase reimbursement to the property owner by the City for right-of-way
dedication. Under the existing Acquisition and Funding Agreement, reimbursement is due to the
Applicant upon completion of work and submission of a complete and valid payment request
under the assumption the entire property would develop in one phase. The City has requested
that the Applicant agree to amend the Acquisition and Funding Agreement to phase payment for
right-of-way dedications on Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard in correspondence with
development phases and property’s revenue generation into the Community Facilities District
triggered by the issuance of a building permit. The proposed amendment to the Acquisition and
Funding Agreement would allow the City to pay the phased reimbursement amounts
incrementally with the issuance of building permits for Development Areas B, C, D and E. This
phased approach would align the payment made to the developer with the timing that would
generate the necessary revenue from the property tax assessment to finance the payment. The
City Council will concurrently consider the proposed amendment to the Development
Agreement and the Acquisition and Funding Agreement. The Planning Commission will make a
recommendation to the City Council on its approval of the proposed amendment to the
Development Agreement. The proposed amendment to the Acquisition and Funding Agreement
is not under the purview of the Commission.
A-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
April 16, 2018
Page 4 of 6
Table No. 1: Term Extension Milestones Comparison (Existing vs. Proposed)
Anniversary
Date
Existing Term Milestones Proposed Term Milestones
5-Year
A-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
April 16, 2018
Page 5 of 6
Anniversary
Date
Existing Term Milestones Proposed Term Milestones
10-Year
(continued)
Compliance with the milestones
will enact a 5-year extension to the
term of the development
agreement.
Compliance with the milestones
will enact a 5-year extension to the
term of the development
agreement.
15-Year
A-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
April 16, 2018
Page 6 of 6
2. The proposed Development Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the
regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district(s) in which the project is and
will be located; and
3. The proposed Development Agreement is compatible with the orderly development of
property in the surrounding area; and
4. The proposed Development Agreement is not otherwise detrimental to the health and
safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
Staff believes that the A-Town Project and the proposed amendment to the Development
Agreement meets the requirements listed above and therefore, recommends approval of the
amended Development Agreement. Additionally, staff believes the proposed amendment to the
Development Agreement will serve to provide surety for the developer based on their current
construction schedule and include benefits to the City, including financial flexibility for the
Platinum Triangle CFD and associated reimbursement schedule for payment of right-of-way
dedications for the A-Town Project.
Environmental Impact Analysis: In conjunction with its approval of the Development
Agreement, City Council determined that Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for
the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, along with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No.
321, together with other previously approved environmental documentation, were the appropriate
environmental documentation for the approval of the Development Agreement. Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission determine that this aforementioned documentation
remains relevant and informative for the proposed amendment to the Development Agreement in
that the proposed amendment is not a substantial change that requires subsequent environmental
review. Attachment 6 provides further analysis to support this conclusion.
CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached
resolution recommending that the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Development
Agreement for the A-Town Project with the proposed term extension milestones.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
G. Scott Koehm Irma Huitron
Senior Planner Acting Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution
2. Draft Development Agreement Ordinance
3. Term Extension Milestones Exhibit “G” (Existing Development Agreement)
4. Term Extension Milestones Exhibit “G” (Proposed Amended Development Agreement)
5. Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2005-00008
6. Environmental Impact Analysis
I (PTMU)DEV 2013-00034A
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BBANK
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BSERVICE STATION
I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area CSOUTHERN CALIFORNIAGAS COMPANYOFFICES
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BRETAIL
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BMIXED USEI (PTMU)Katella Su b-Area ARESTAURANT
I (PTMU)Katella Su b-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)Katella Su b-Area BPARKVIRIDIAN
I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area BJEFFERSON STADIUM PARK
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BANAHEIM APARTMENTCOMMUNITIES
I (PTMU)Katella Su b-Area AKATELLAGRAND
I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area CINDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)OfficeRETAIL
I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)Katella Su b-Area AINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area AINDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area AINDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area AINDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area AINDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)Katella Su b-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)Gen e AutrySub-Area AVACANT
I (PTMU)Katella Su b-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)Katella Su b-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT
I (PTMU)Katella Su b-Area BA-TOW N METRO
E KATELLA AVE
E GENE AUTRY WAY
S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D
E PARK STS
W
E S T
S
I D E D R
S U N I O N S T
S SANTA CRUZ ST
E MERIDIAN ST
GE NE AUTRY WAY
S M A R K E T S T
E S TA N F O R D C T
S B E T M O R L N
GENE AUTRY WAY
E. KATELLA AVE
E. CERRITOS AVE
S
.
L
E
W
I
S
S
T
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
S . H A S T E R S T S .D O U G L A S S
R D
S . S U N K I S T S T
S . C L E M E N T I N E S T
1 4 0 4 E a s t K a t e lla Avenue
D E V N o . 2 0 1 3 -00034A
Subject Property APN: 232-121-28 232-121-30 to 232-121-39
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Photo:Ma y 2 016
E KATELLA AVE
E GENE AUTRY WAY
S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V DE PARK STS
W
E S T
S
I D E D R
S U N I O N S T
S SANTA CRUZ ST
E MERIDIAN ST
GE NE AUTRY WAY
S M A R K E T S T
E S TA N F O R D C T
S B E T M O R L N
S A U B U R N W A Y
S C A M
P T O N A V E
S A
N
AHEIM W
AY
S M E T R O D R
GENE AUTRY WAY
R I G N E Y W A Y
E. KATELLA AVE
E. CERRITOS AVE
S
.
L
E
W
I
S
S
T
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
S . H A S T E R S T S .D O U G L A S S
R D
S . S U N K I S T S T
S . C L E M E N T I N E S T
1 4 0 4 E a s t K a t e lla Avenue
D E V N o . 2 0 1 3 -00034A
Subject Property APN: 232-121-28 232-121-30 to 232-121-39
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Photo:Ma y 2 016
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
-1- PC2018-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND
RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2015-00008 BY
AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND PT METRO,
LLC, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
(DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2015-00008)
WHEREAS, on October 20, 2015, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted
Ordinance No. 6345 approving that certain Amended and Restated Development Agreement No.
2005-00008, dated October 27, 2015 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County
California on November 13, 2015 as Instrument no. 2015000586936 (the "Development
Agreement") between the City of Anaheim and PT METRO, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company ("Owner") with respect to that certain real property located at 1404 East Katella
Avenue and consisting of approximately 43.1-acres generally located west of State College
Boulevard between Katella Avenue and Gene Autry Way (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, Section 2 of the Development Agreement provides for a 5-year term with up
to three 5-year extension terms provided that development milestones have been achieved; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 19 of the Development Agreement, Owner has
requested that the development milestones be modified relative to the timing and completion of
residential units within the 5-year and 7.5-year anniversary of the Development Agreement. In
response to Owner's request, the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement
attached hereto as Attachment No. 1 and incorporated herein by this reference has been prepared
in response to Owner's request; and
WHEREAS, pursuant City Council Resolution No. 82R-565 (the “Procedures
Resolution”), which was adopted by the City Council on November 23, 1982, the Planning
Commission shall provide a recommendation to the City Council with regard to Amendment No. 1
to the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA
Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents; and
-2- PC2018-***
WHEREAS, the revisions to the term extension milestones associated with the
Development Agreement will not extend the term of the Development Agreement or increase
unit count, but simply will serve to provide flexibility within the existing term for construction
milestones. As such, Amendment No. 1 is a minor change to the Development Agreement.
Therefore, the approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement does not
necessitate additional environmental review because it will not result in new or substantially
more severe impacts that were not previously evaluated and/or require additional mitigation
measures, and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time FSEIR No. 339
was certified and its subsequent addenda were approved that triggers the need for the preparation
of subsequent environmental review. The analysis in FSEIR No. 339 included anticipated build-
out contemplated by the Development Agreement. FSEIR No. 339, together with Mitigation
Monitoring Plan No. 321 and all supporting and subsequent environmental documentation
remain relevant and retain informational value as to the A-Town Project; and
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2018, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with
the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony
concerning the contents of Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement and to investigate
and make findings in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments (if any) of all persons desiring to be heard, the Planning Commission considered all
factors relating to Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the action taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of
and based upon all of the testimony, evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine that proposed Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Development Agreement
No. 2015-00008, in the form presented at this meeting, meets all of the standards and
requirements set forth in Resolution No. 82R-565 (the “Procedures Resolution”), which was
adopted by the City Council on November 23, 1982, that is:
1. The proposed Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated
Development Agreement No. 2015-00008 is consistent with the General Plan of the
City of Anaheim and with the goals, policies, programs and objectives specified in
the General Plan;
-3- PC2018-***
2. The proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated
Development Agreement No. 2015-00008 is compatible with the uses authorized
in, and the regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district(s) in which the
Property is located;
3. The proposed Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated
Development Agreement No. 2015-00008 is compatible with the orderly
development of property in the surrounding area in that it is in conformance with
and implements the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone
requirements; and
4. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 is not
otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
BE IT FURTHER RESOVED that the Planning Commission does hereby determine
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2015-00008 is a
modification is not a substantial change that requires subsequent environmental review as
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion
Project, along with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321, together with other previously approved
environmental documentation, remain relevant and informative
BE IT FURTHER RESOVED that the Planning Commission does hereby recommend
that the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to Amendment and Restated Development
Agreement No. 2015-00008, in the form presented at this meeting.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
April 16, 2018.
___
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
-4- PC2018-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 16, 2018, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of April, 2018.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
127387/LHM
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
[ATTACHED]
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City Council
City of Anaheim
c/o City Clerk
P.O. Box 3222
Anaheim, California 92805
____________________________________________________________________________
(SPACE ABOVE LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY.)
EXEMPT FROM FEES PURSUANT TO
CALIFORNIA GOVERNTMENT CODE §27383
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2005-00008
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AND
PT METRO, LLC
____________________________________
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2005-00008
This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT No. 2005-00008 (this “Amendment No. 1"), dated for purposes of identification
only as of this day of , 2018 (the "Date of Amendment"), is made and
entered into by and between the CITY OF ANAHEIM, a charter city and municipal
corporation, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of
California (hereinafter "CITY"), and PT METRO, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(referred to herein as "OWNER").
RECITALS
A. On October 20, 2015, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Ordinance No.
6345 approving that certain Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2005-
00008, dated October 27, 2015 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County
California on November 13, 2015 as Instrument no. 2015000586936 (the "Development
Agreement") with respect to that certain real property described in the Legal Description
of the Property attached hereto as Attachment No. 1 and incorporated herein by this
reference. All such terms in this Amendment No. 1 shall have the meanings ascribed to
such terms in the Development Agreement unless otherwise defined in this Amendment
No. 1. Copies of the Development Agreement are available as a public record in the
office of the City Clerk located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California.
B. The Term of the Development Agreement commenced on the Development Agreement
Date and shall extend for a period of five (5) years thereafter, unless extended or earlier
terminated as provided in the Development Agreement. Thereafter, the Term of the
Development Agreement shall be automatically extended for up to three (3) additional
five (5) year periods provided that development milestones described in Exhibit G are
timely achieved.
C. OWNER has requested that the development milestones set forth in Exhibit G be
modified relative to the timing and completion of residential units within the 5-year and
7.5-year anniversary periods.
D. CITY and OWNER (each a "Party" and jointly, the "Parties") intend, in this Amendment
No. 1, to approve the OWNER's request to amend Exhibit G.
NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES,
COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Section 2.2 of the
Development Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
"2.2 The term (hereinafter called "Term") of this Development Agreement shall be that period of
time during which this Development Agreement shall be in effect and bind the parties hereto.
The Term shall commence on the Development Agreement Date and shall extend for a period of
five (5) years thereafter, unless extended or earlier terminated as provided herein. Thereafter, the
Term of this Development Agreement shall be automatically extended for up to two (2)
additional two and one half (2 ½) year periods followed by two (2) additional five (5) year
periods provided that the development milestones described in Exhibit G are timely achieved.
Owner shall submit proof of compliance with the project milestones shown in Exhibit G prior to
the expiration of each period set forth therein. The Planning Director shall determine if the
project milestones have been met, and will inform the City Council of the extension of the
Development Agreement."
SECTION 2. AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Exhibit G is deleted
in its entirety and replaced with new Exhibit G attached hereto as Attachment No. 2 and
incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 3. INTEGRATION. Except as expressly provided to the contrary herein, all other
provisions of the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The
Development Agreement and this Amendment No. 1 shall hereinafter be collectively referred to
as the "Agreement". The Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions of agreement
between the Parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the Parties
with respect to the subject matter hereof.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Amendment No. 1 shall take effect upon the date the
ordinance approving this Amendment No. 1 takes effect.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AGREEMENT NO. 1 AS OF THE RESPECTIVE DATES SET FORTH BELOW.
Dated:
"CITY"
CITY OF ANAHEIM,
a municipal corporation and charter city
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
THERESA BASS, ACTING CITY CLERK
By:
Acting City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROBERT FABELA, CITY ATTORNEY
By:
Leonie H. Mulvihill
Deputy City Attorney
Dated:
“OWNER”:
PT METRO, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company
By: Lennar Homes of California, Inc.,
a California corporation,
Its sole member
By:__________________________
Ryan Gatchalian
Vice President
127372v3/LHM
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the
individual who signed the document to which this
certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California )
)
County of )
On ________________, before me,
[date] [here insert name and title of the officer]
personally appeared
[here insert name(s) of signer(s)]
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity/ies, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is
true and correct.
Witness my hand and official seal.
(Signature) (Seal)
Attachment No. 1
Legal Description of the Property
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
ALL OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE, LOTS A, B, MARKET STREET, BRYANT
STREET, GRANVILLE DRIVE, TRIAD STREET, UNION STREET, MERIDIAN LANE,
METRO DRIVE, PARK LANE AND WESTSIDE DRIVE OF TRACT NO. 16859 AS SHOWN
ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 892, PAGES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY.
Attachment No. 2
[ATTACHED]
EXHIBIT "G"
TERM EXTENSION MILESTONES
1) Milestones to be Completed by the fifth (5th) anniversary of the date of the Authorizing
Ordinance In Order to Receive the First 2.5-Year Extension of the Development Agreement Term:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2005-00008 BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND PT METRO, LLC
AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATED THERETO;
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND THE
CITY CLERK TO ATTEST SAID AGREEMENT FOR AND ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY.
WHEREAS, On October 20, 2015, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted
Ordinance No. 6345 approving that certain Amended and Restated Development Agreement No.
2005-00008, dated October 27, 2015 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County
California on November 13, 2015 as Instrument No. 2015000586936 (the "Development
Agreement") between the City of Anaheim and PT Metro, LLC ("Owner") with respect to that
certain real property located at 1404 East Katella Avenue and generally depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A and legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto, with both
exhibits incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 19 of the Development Agreement, and in March 2018,
PT Metro, LLC submitted an application to amend the development milestones set forth in
Exhibit G to the Development Agreement. Specifically "Owner" has requested that the
development milestones be modified relative to the timing and completion of residential units
within the 5-year and 7.5-year anniversary of the Development Agreement. In response to
Owner's request, Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement No.
2015-00008 ("Amendment No. 1"), which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated
herein by this reference, was prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
conducted a public hearing on Amendment No. 1, at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on
April 16, 2018, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, and considered
information presented by City Staff and evidence for and against the proposed Amendment No.
1; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the adoption of its Resolution No. PC2018-
__________on April 16, 2018, which is incorporated herein by this reference, recommended that
the City Council approve Amendment No. 1, and made certain findings that Amendment No. 1
in the form presented at this meeting meets all of the requirements set forth in Resolution No.
82R-565 (the “Procedures Resolution”), which was adopted by the City Council on November
23, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing on Amendment No. 1 at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on ____________, 2018, at 7:00 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law; and
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA
Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 revises the term extension milestones associated with the
Development Agreement; will not extend the term of the Development Agreement or increase
unit count; and serves to provide flexibility within the existing term for construction milestones.
As such, Amendment No. 1 is a minor change to the Development Agreement. Therefore, the
approval of Amendment No. 1 does not necessitate additional environmental review because it
will not result in new or substantially more severe impacts that were not previously evaluated
and/or require additional mitigation measures, and there is no new information of substantial
importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of
reasonable diligence at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified and its subsequent addenda were
approved that triggers the need for the preparation of subsequent environmental review. The
analysis in FSEIR No. 339 included anticipated build-out contemplated by the Development
Agreement. FSEIR No. 339, together with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321 and all
supporting and subsequent environmental documentation remain relevant and retain
informational value as to the project contemplated in the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, after careful consideration of the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council does hereby
find and determine, with respect to the request for the proposed Amendment No. 1, that all of the
conditions and criteria for the approval of said Amended and Restated Development Agreement
are present as follows:
1. The Development Agreement as amended by Amendment No. 1
is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim and with the goals,
policies, programs and objectives specified in the General Plan;
2. The Development Agreement as amended by Amendment No. 1
is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the
applicable zoning district(s) in which the Property is located;
3. The Development Agreement as amended by Amendment No. 1
is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area in
that it is in conformance with and implements the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use
Overlay Zone requirements; and
4. The Development Agreement as amended by Amendment No. 1
is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
That Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2015-
00008, in the form presented at this meeting be, and the same is hereby, approved.
SECTION 2.
That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to
attest said Amendment No. 1 for and on behalf of the City.
THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Anaheim held on the ____ day of ______________, 2018, and thereafter
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the ____ day of
______________, 2018, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF ANAHEIM
By: ________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
ACTING CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
127386
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT "C"
[To be Inserted]
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBIT "G"
TERM EXTENSION MILESTONES
1) Milestones to be Completed by the fifth (5th) anniversary of the date of the Authorizing
Ordinance In Order to Receive the First 2.5-Year Extension of the Development Agreement
Term:
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
5
Environmental Impact Analysis
When an environmental impact report (EIR) has been certified, the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires subsequent or supplement environmental review
only when one or more of the following events has occurred:
(1) substantial project changes are proposed that require major
revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new or substantially
increased significant environmental effects; (2) substantial changes
in the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken
require major revisions of the EIR due to new or substantially
increased significant environmental effects; or (3) new information
of substantial importance to the project that was not known and
could not have been known at the time the previous EIR was adopted
becomes available showing a new or substantially increased
significant environmental effects.
(Pub. Resources Code, § 21166; CEQA Guidelines, § 15162 [emphasis added].)
These thresholds are not present, and the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated
Development Agreement Development Agreement (the “Project”) is sufficiently analyzed under
the existing Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) No. 339 and its associated
Addenda. In particular, the total number of Project units has not changed, the length of the overall
A-Town Project buildout has not changed, and both the circulation and site plan have remained
the same since the Planning Commission and City Council last reviewed the A-Town
Project. Additionally, there is no new information of substantial importance to the A-Town Project
that was not known and could not have been known previously. (See Pub. Resources Code, §
21166; CEQA Guidelines, § 15162.) Therefore, the analysis in FSEIR No. 339 included
anticipated build-out of the approved A-Town Project. FSEIR No. 339, together with Mitigation
Monitoring Plan No. 321 and all supporting and subsequent environmental documentation remain
relevant and retain informational value as to the A-Town Project. (Friends of the College of San
Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College District (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937.) The
revisions to the term extension milestones associated with the Amended and Restated
Development Agreement for the A-Town Project will not extend the term of the Amended and
Restated Development Agreement or increase unit count, but simply will serve to provide
flexibility within the existing term for construction milestones. As such, Amendment No. 1 is a
minor change to the Development Agreement. Therefore, the approval of Amendment No. 1 to
the Amended and Restated Development Agreement does not necessitate additional environmental
review because it will not result in new or substantially more severe impacts that were not
previously evaluated and/or require additional mitigation measures, and there is no new
information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with
the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified and its subsequent
addenda were approved that triggers the need for the preparation of subsequent environmental
review.
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 6
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: APRIL 16, 2018
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00519
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00311
MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2018-00674
LOCATION: Citywide
REQUEST: This is a City-initiated request to:
a) Receive a City Council-directed parks needs assessment document, the
“Anaheim Parks Plan”;
b) Amend the Green Element of the General Plan to implement a
recommendation from the Anaheim Parks Plan to create new park categories
and update park facility statistics; and, update figures within the Land Use,
Circulation and Green Elements of the General Plan to reflect existing park
facilities that have been added since the last comprehensive update of the
General Plan; and,
c) Reclassify park properties owned by the City of Anaheim from the zones
that the park properties are currently within to the Public Recreation (PR)
Zone.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission,
receive the Anaheim Parks Plan; and, by adopting the attached resolutions,
determine that the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Reclassification
is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to
Sections 15060(c)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines; and recommend City Council
approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 and Reclassification No.
2018-00311.
BACKGROUND: In 2004, the City comprehensively updated its General Plan,
Zoning Code, and related maps. Since that time, the City has amended the General
Plan, Zoning Code, and related maps on an as-needed basis as the result of staff’s
periodic review of the documents, based on policy direction from the City Council,
and as a result of specific development projects.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00519, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00311, AND
MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2018-00674
April 16, 2018
Page 2 of 5
On February 28, 2017, the Anaheim City Council approved funding for the Community Services
Department to prepare a park needs assessment, referred to as the “Anaheim Parks Plan,” to
evaluate the City’s park system; provide recommendations for the provision of parks and facilities
and improvement of the existing park assets; and, assess current conditions and park maintenance.
As part of the Anaheim Parks Plan preparation process, Community Services staff enlisted the
assistance of representatives from other city departments by forming a technical advisory
committee (consisting of staff from various City departments), a steering committee (made up of
representatives from nonprofit recreation providers), school districts, the county of Orange, the
disabled community and others. Stakeholders representing user sports groups, had input, as did the
general community though a series of council district meetings and an opinion survey concerning
various aspects of the park system. The City received nearly 7,000 survey responses online or at
community events between April 22 and Sept. 23, 2017. Additionally, staff reviewed recreational
standards and guidelines from various city and industry providers to determine how Anaheim’s
parks compare to others in nearby cities and on a national level. As a result, the Anaheim Parks
Plan includes recommendations that will assist in guiding the improvement of the park system until
the year 2025, contingent upon funding.
The Parks Commission reviewed the draft Anaheim Parks Plan at its meeting on April 11, 2018 and
recommended City Council approval of the document. Staff anticipates that the City Council will
review the Anaheim Parks Plan document at its meeting on May 8, 2018. The Council’s review of
the associated proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Reclassification, which are further
described below, would occur at a meeting subsequent to the Council’s review of the Anaheim Park
Plan document. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Reclassification are under the
purview of the Planning Commission; the Anaheim Parks Plan document is not. Therefore, Staff is
requesting that Planning Commission “receive” the Anaheim Parks Plan document and make
recommendations to Council on the related General Plan Amendment and Zone Reclassification.
PROPOSAL: Staff is proposing amendments to the Green Element of the City's General Plan to
reflect recommendations from the Anaheim Parks Plan. In addition, staff is proposing updating
figures within the Land Use, Circulation and Green Elements of the General Plan to reflect to reflect
existing park facilities that the City has added since the last comprehensive update of the General
Plan. Finally, the staff is proposing a Zone Reclassification to provide consistency between existing
parks and their Zone classifications. Below is a summary of the recommended changes.
General Plan Amendment
Staff is proposing to amend three General Plan Elements: the Land Use, Circulation and Green
Elements. Amendments to the Green Element reflect a recommendation from the Anaheim Parks
Plan to revise the General Plan to create new park categories and update existing park facility
statistics. The proposed changes would update Figure LU-4 (Land Use Plan) of the Land Use
Element, Figure C-5 (Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities) of the Circulation Element, Figure G-
1 (Green Plan) of the Green Element, Figure G-4 (Existing Park Facilities) of the Green Element,
and Table G-1 (Existing Park Acreages and Facilities) of the Green Element.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00519, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00311, AND
MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2018-00674
April 16, 2018
Page 3 of 5
In addition, the proposed General Plan Amendment would designate all existing park properties
owned by the City of Anaheim that are not within the "Parks" land use designation to said
designation. The Parks land use designation allows for active and passive recreational uses such as
parks, trails, athletic fields, interpretive centers and golf courses. Subject sites that the General Plan
Amendment would designate for Parks land use include Center City Park, located east of City Hall
and southeast of the Downtown Community Center; and all other park properties that the City has
developed since the 2004 Comprehensive General Plan Update and are not currently designated for
Parks by the General Plan. The General Plan Amendment also includes minor corrections and
clarifications to General Plan text and figures to more accurately represent the City’s park resources
due to technological improvements in mapping and/or other available information.
Exhibit A of Attachment 2 provides existing and proposed figures for Figure LU-4 (Land Use Plan)
of the Land Use Element and Figure C-5 (Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities) of the
Circulation Element. In addition, Exhibit A also provides a redline version of the Green Element of
the General Plan, where more comprehensive changes have been made to reflect the
recommendation from the Anaheim Parks Plan to create new park categories and update existing
park facility statistics. Exhibit B of Attachment 2 depicts the 19 specific properties that the
proposed General Plan Amendment would change to the Parks land use designation or make minor
corrections to Park land use designations. Staff is not proposing revisions to the General Plan for
any potential future park development. The proposed amendments are limited to city-owned park
properties.
Zone Reclassification
The City implements the General Plan Parks land use designation through either the Public
Recreation (PR) Zone or the Semi-Public (SP) Zone. The proposed Zone Reclassification would
reclassify all City-owned park properties to the Public Recreational (PR) Zone if said properties are
not currently within the PR Zone. The proposed reclassification includes Center City Park, located
east of City Hall and southeast of the Downtown Community Center among 52 other City park
facilities that the City’s Zoning Map does not currently classify within the PR zone.
The intent of the PR Zone is to establish for the benefit of the health, safety and general welfare of
the citizens of Anaheim and its visitors, a zone to preserve, regulate and control the orderly use and
enjoyment of City-owned properties and facilities and adjacent private property. The
reclassification also includes minor corrections to the City’s Zoning Map to represent more
accurately the City’s park resources due to technological improvements in mapping and or other
available information. Exhibit A of Attachment 3 indicates the specific properties that the proposed
Zone Reclassification would reclassify to the PR Zone. Staff is not proposing any Zone
Reclassifications for potential future park development.
ANALYSIS: Before the Planning Commission can recommend approval of a General Plan
Amendment to the City Council, it must make the following findings:
a) The proposed amendment maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan;
b) The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience or welfare of the City;
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00519, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00311, AND
MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2018-00674
April 16, 2018
Page 4 of 5
c) The proposed amendment would maintain the balance of land uses within the City; and
d) If the amendment is to the General Plan Land Use Map, the subject property is physically
suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access,
physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding
land uses.
The proposed General Plan Amendment meets the above findings because all proposed land use
changes are for properties currently being used as park land. The Anaheim Parks Plan contains
guiding principles to fully evaluate the park system, maintain the standard of at least two acres of
parks per 1,000 residents; encourage health; promote safety; enhance passive and active recreation;
and, promote environmental responsibility. The proposed General Plan Amendment would
implement each of these guiding principles. This ultimately benefits Anaheim residents and all
users of Anaheim park facilities. Preserving park land with the proposed General Plan Amendment
continues to maintain the balance of land uses within the City and complements surrounding land
uses. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment.
Before the Planning Commission can recommend approval of a Zone Reclassification to the City
Council, it must make the following findings:
a) The proposed reclassification is consistent with the General Plan's land use designation for
the subject sites.
b) The proposed reclassification is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper
development of the subject sites and is compatible with the surrounding uses.
c) The proposed reclassification of the subject sites does properly relate to the zone and
permitted uses established in close proximity to the subject sites and to the zones and their
permitted uses generally established throughout the community.
The proposed Zone Reclassification is consistent with the property’s General Plan land use
designation. As described previously, the PR Zone implements the General Plan Parks land use
designation. In addition, all of the proposed Zone Reclassifications are for properties owned by the
City of Anaheim that are currently parks and/or associated park facilities, such as community
centers. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed Zone Reclassification.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine
that these actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section
15060(c)(2) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. These actions are exempt because the
amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Code will not result in a direct or reasonably
foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The sites that staff is requesting to be
designated "Parks" in the General Plan and/or reclassified in the Zoning Code to the Public
Recreational (PR) Zone are existing park sites. Therefore, the proposed action will not result in
identifying any additional or new sites as proposed or preferred park sites. Nothing in the proposed
actions commits the City to constructing specific new parks or any improvements to existing parks.
All future uses and/or park improvements will be conditioned on CEQA compliance on a project-
by-project basis pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15004(b)(2), which will be coordinated with
the existing planning, review and project approval processes.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00519, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00311, AND
MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2018-00674
April 16, 2018
Page 5 of 5
CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Reclassification to the City Council, as both would
preserve City-owned parks and park facilities. Additionally, the proposed amendments to the Green
Element of the General Plan are a result of recommendations from the Anaheim Parks Plan, a joint
effort between the Department of Community Services, the Planning and Building Department, and
representatives from the community. Finally, the proposed changes to the General Plan figures and
Zoning Map will update these planning resources to reflect the existing park uses rather than non-
park facilities, so that future development of park land and surrounding properties can be
appropriately analyzed. Because no new potential facilities are being identified and changes to land
use designations and/or zoning classifications preserve existing park land uses, staff believes that
the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Reclassification maintains compatibility with
surrounding land uses and recommends approval by the Planning Commission to the City Council.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Charles Guiam Irma Huitron
Assistant Planner Acting Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Planning for Parks - Draft
2. Draft Resolution – GPA2018-00519
3. Draft Resolution – RCL2018-00311
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Anaheim Parks Plan
2
DRAFT 4,11 2018
T
a
b
l
e
o
f
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
- Table of Contents
Team Acknowledgments
Executive Summary
Introduction
Where We Were
What We Heard
Survey Results
Where We Are
Parks and People
Park Acreage Standards
Currnet Park Maps
Where we are going
Guiding Principles and Objectives
General Plan Upadte
10-minute Walk Campaign
Park and Facility Needs and Recommendations
Park Maintenance and Safety
Infrastructure Needs
Funding Opportunities
Overall Recommendations
Closing Statement
Appendices
4
6
8
9
10
12
16
17
18
22
23
25
30
40
47
49
54
55
56
Anaheim Parks Plan
3
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Ta
b
l
e
o
f
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
4
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Team AcknowledgmentsAnaheim Parks Plan
James Vanderbilt
City Council Member At Large
Denise Barnes
City Council, Member District 1
Stephen Faessel
City Council Member, District 5
Sandra Sagert
Community Preservation Manager,
Anaheim Beautiful
Charlotte Clement
Assistant Director Facilities & Planning,
Anaheim Elementary School District
Nathan Zug
Magnolia Baptist Church
Anaheim Religious Community Council and
Love Anaheim
Sylvia Jarvi
At large
John Machiaverna and Mayra Martin
Boys and Girls Club
Judith Deen
Community Gardens
Dr. Cynthia Smith
Program Director
Creative Identity
Mark Richard Daniels
Commissioner
Cultural and Heritage Commission
Kelly Soemantoro and Maria Minaglia
Orange County Health Care Agency
Natalia Gaerlan
Senior Project Manager, Orange County Parks
Kathleene Sandoval and Stefany Urreg
Commissioners
Youth Commission
Cindy Leinart
Property Manager
Orange County Water District
Ronald Lebs
Assistant Superintendent of Facilities & Planning
Orange Unified School District
Nichole Rupp
Commissioner
Parks and Recreation Commission
Rick Martens and Debbie Jauch
YMCA
Larry Pasco
Acting Director
Pamela Galera
Principal Project Planner and Landscape Architect
Richard Mayer
Part Time Principal Project Planner
Sjany Larson-Cash
Community Services Manager
T
e
a
m
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
m
e
n
t
s
65 Express
65 Plus Senior
65+League
70 Softball
Anaheim Futbol Club
Anaheim Hills Little League
Anaheim Pony Baseball
Anaheim Pop Warner
Anaheim Senior 75+
Anaheim Soccer Association
Best Soccer League
Canyon Hills Soccer
Canyon PSA
City of Yorba Linda
East Anaheim Little League
Fairmont Preparatory Academy
Miracle League
North Anaheim Little League
North Orange County Youth Soccer Premier
League
OC Batbusters
Orange Canyon Girls Softball
Orange County Community Youth Soccer
League
PLA Sports
Surf City/PGF
United All Stars
Parks and Recreation Commission
Cultural and Heritage Commission
Youth Commission
Senior Commission
Community Services Staff
Stakeholder Sports Organizations (Met on November 13,2017)
Commissions
Workgroup
Steering Committee (Met on November 1, 2017 and Feburary 15, 2018)
Anaheim Parks Plan
5
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Bianca Alcock
Code Enforcement Supervisor
Gus Gonzalez
Senior Planner
Charles Guiam
Assistant Planner
Anaheim Sporn
Community Services Superintendent
Carlos Urquiza
Community Services Supervisor
Jane Newell
Library Services Manager
JJ Jimenez
Associate Project Planner
Kimberly Kelemen
Community Services Superintendent
Naomi Gruenthal
Associate Project Planner
Rob Gomes and Jose Canedo
Park Services Superintendents
Craig Friesen
Police Lieutenant
David Mori
Design Services Manager
David Suarez
Operations Superintendent
Julie Lyons
Fleet & Facility Services Manager
Marco Lucero
Administrative Analyst
Chris Carter
GIS Manager
Luke Smude
IT Project Manager
Andy Nogal
Senior Project Manager
Mike Lyster
Chief Communications Officer
Erin Ryan
Communications Specialist
Greg Garcia
Acting Assistant City Manager
Rick Barrett, LEED AP
MIG
Principal
CJ Davis
MIG
Project Manager
Andrew Kanzler
Resource Program Specialist II
And a special thanks goes to Brent Dennis, former Director, Anaheim Community Services Department; Alan Hudak, former Anaheim Park Services Superintendent; Stacy
Michalak, former Anaheim Community Services Supervisor; and Jeff Dickman, Orange County Flood Control District for their participation in the development of this document.
Te
a
m
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
m
e
n
t
s
Police Public Works
Planning Finance
Community and Economic Development City Administration
Anaheim Parks Plan ConsultantPublic Utilities
Special Thanks
City of Anaheim Internal Staff Technical Advisory Committee
Community Services (Met on September 27, 2017 and Feburary 14, 2018)
Anaheim Parks Plan
6
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Executive Summary
On Feb. 28, 2017, the Anaheim City Council
approved funding for the Community Services
Department to prepare a park needs assessment
to evaluate the City’s park system. This assessment
evaluates park conditions and maintenance
practices and provides recommendations for new
parks and facilities.
To complete the assessment, now known as the
Anaheim Parks Plan, staff enlisted the assistance
of representatives from other city departments
through a technical advisory committee (consisting
of staff from various City departments), a steering
committee (made up of representatives from
nonprofit recreation providers), school districts,
the county of Orange, the disabled community
and others. Stakeholders representing user sports
group, had input, as did the general community
though a series of council district meetings and an
opinion survey concerning various aspects of the
park system.
Nearly 7,000 survey responses were received
online or at community events between April 22
and Sept. 23, 2017. Additionally, staff reviewed
recreational standards and guidelines from various
city and industry providers to determine how
Anaheim’s parks compare to others in nearby cities
and on a national level.
As a result, recommendations have been
developed which will assist in guiding the
improvement of the park system until the year
2025, contingent upon funding. The assessment
also recommends that the City implement the
10-Minute Walk Campaign, as developed by the
Trust For Public Land, the National Recreation and
Parks Association and the Urban Land Institute, to
insure that all residents can access a park or open
space area within a 10-minute walk (essentially
one-half mile) from their residence. The City of
Anaheim General Plan currently defines “park
deficient” areas as properties outside a half
mile radius from a park. Implementation of the
10-minute walk will require close cooperation with
the seven school districts within the City as school
campuses were included into the radii used to
determine the 10-minute walk coverage.
While the City’s park standard of two acres of parks
per 1,000 residents remains the same, the types
of park categories within the park system have
expanded. Previously, the system was composed of
neighborhood parks, community parks and special
use parks, which included mini-parks. Based upon
the types of facilities that have actually been built
over the years, staff is recommending that the
park categories be expanded. The expanded park
categories will now include pocket parks, mini-
parks, neighborhood parks, community parks,
nature parks, recreation center parks and special
use parks and will be included in a future general
plan update. These changes are recommended
so that the various park types are more easily
understood by park users.
The Anaheim Parks Plan followed several guiding
principles and objectives which were developed
and approved by the advisory committees.
Guiding Principles
• Fully evaluate existing park system
• Maintain the standard of at least two acres of
parks per 1,000 residents
• Encourage health
• Promote safety
• Enhance passive and active recreation
• Promote environmental responsibility
• Follow existing policies and add new ones as
appropriate
Objectives
• Enhance and expand park system
• Higher priority to maintenance
• Connect with nature and enhance appreciation
• Enhance the urban forest
E
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
PARKS DIVISION MISSION STATEMENT:
To enrich the quality of life of individuals, families, and the community by providing excellent parks, trails, and
recreational facilities through outstanding customer service, sustainable environmental practices, and strong
employee development and commitment.
Anaheim Parks Plan
7
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Recommendations
The following recommendations were formulated
based on the guiding principles, objectives, survey
input, stakeholder input and analysis of the park
system.
1. Execute more facility joint-use agreements
with the seven school districts within
Anaheim
2. Create sports complexes
3. Execute lease agreements with other
public agencies.
4. Pursue funding opportunities and increase
park development fees
5. Acquire private land for park development
6. Redesign existing parks to expand uses
a. Plant trees
b. Create access for all users
7. Enhance park maintenance
8. Determine the specific criteria for the
inclusion of restrooms in parks
9. Allow for use of high school community
swimming pools and plan for a new aquatic
center
10. Update the general plan as needed
a. Add new park categories to the green
element of the general plan.
b. Protect parkland by ensuring that all
parks are zoned open space parks
11. Complete a community services strategic
plan
Ex
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Anaheim Parks Plan
8
DRAFT 4,11 2018
The City of Anaheim’s park system has an extensive
history, going back to the early 1920s with the
development of the first Anaheim park. With the
approval of this Parks Plan the City will have 63
parks, totaling nearly 700 acres with more parks
planned for the future.
Because much of the park system was developed
in the latter part of the 20th century, the system
has aged and needs upgrading to replace
deteriorated or inefficient infrastructure. The
Anaheim Parks Plan evaluated existing and
planned amenities and considers redesign and
redevelopment efforts to meet new public needs.
This evaluation identified park deficient areas
citywide, and by city council district, to determine
if and where new parks should be provided.
Additionally, maintenance practices and
procedures have been reviewed to ensure the
condition of facilities are maintained to the highest
standard possible for the safety and security of the
general public.
For the almost 100 years the park system has
been serving the public, Anaheim has been
known as a prime provider of parks and open
space. The purpose of the Anaheim Parks Plan
is to determine what the current needs are and
develop an approach to meet those needs. It is
intended that this document serves as a guide for
improvement and to establish practices enabling
the City to continue ensuring the best delivery of
service to the public as possible. As practical, this
document should be reviewed and updated every
10 years to ensure the parks system remains in the
best possible condition for Anaheim residents and
visitors.
Additionally, this document should be the
foundation for the recommendations and future
improvements identified in the executive summary
including development of a new strategic plan for
the Anaheim Community Services Department.
The document should also be consulted
when determining locations of new parks and
identification of new facilities within specific parks,
and to verify that new and improved parks meet
the guiding principles and objectives for Anaheim
Parks. Finally, all future park enhancements should
include the recommended maintenance and
infrastructure improvements identified in this plan.
- Introduction
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Parks are where kindness thrives and are a
vital component to making communities more
resilient. I’m hindered to join my colleges as
we work to advance park access for all.
-Mayor Tom Tait
9
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan
Wh
e
r
e
w
e
W
e
r
e
- Where We Were
The Anaheim park system began with the
development of the first park in the city, City Park.
Dedicated in 1923, City Park was later renamed
Pearson Park in 1960, after former mayor, Charles
A. Pearson. That park was followed in 1939 by La
Palma Park. Since the development of those two
parks, the park system has grown to 61 parks, with
more being planned for the future.
Early on, the City’s general fund supplied most of
the funding for park acquisition and development
but as the City grew, that reliance shifted to grant
funding from the state and federal government
and to developer fees from the State’s 1975
Quimby Act. In addition, State of California
voters have passed several bond act funding
initiatives for park projects and federal programs
such as federal revenue sharing, the Community
Development Block Grant program and Land and
Water Conservation Fund provided some parkland
acquisition development funding. The majority of
funding for capital projects are from residential
developer impact fees required by the City’s Park
Dedication Ordinance.
As early as 1954, the City established a
developer fee of $25 per dwelling to finance
the acquisition and development of park and
recreational facilities. By 1968 that fee amount
was determined to be insufficient to finance the
park system. In response, the Park Dedication
Ordinance was approved by the City Council to
implement the State’s Quimby Act legislation
and establish a reasonable fee to provide for new
parks. The fee was based upon a formula that
essentially considered the cost of park acquisition
and development, and the applicable city park
standard of parkland acres divided by 1,000
residents.
Throughout its history, the department has
created citizen committees to assist staff in the
development of future plans for parks. Amongst
other things, the staff and citizen committees
developed park master plans, standards for facility
development and provided input on where the
parks should be located throughout the City. One
of the first committees was the 1959 Citizen’s
Advisory Committee, which recommended that the
City establish a standard of one acre of parks per
1,000 residents for neighborhood and community
parks. Standards vary from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction. At the time the Anaheim park standard
was established, the county of Orange and the
state of California had park standards of four park
acres per 1,000 residents.
Many of Anaheim’s parks are located next
to schools. In 1968, a citizen committee
recommended that the park standard be changed
to 1.5 acres of parks per 1,000 residents and that
wherever possible, parks should be located next
to schools. Effectively, when combined with school
fields, the standard could be increased to 4 acres
of shared school/parks per 1,000 residents while
preserving Anaheim’s standard of 1.5 acres of
parks per 1,000 population.
By 1976, the City raised its park acreage standard
to 2 acres of parks per 1,000 residents, which is the
current park to resident standard for the City.
Between the 1950s and the early 1980s, the City’s
park system grew rapidly. With the development of
school/park projects through joint-use agreements
with the various school districts, the City made the
most of combining athletic fields to provide multi-
use sports facilities for the public. Unfortunately,
subsequent years changed that scenario. Schools
began seeing greater attendance, requiring
year-round school and school expansion to
accommodate increased enrollments. Fields
that had been opened for community uses were
returned to school use under the terms of the joint-
use agreements. Concerns regarding the safety
of the school children during school hours were
raised which prompted some districts to fence
their properties, in some cases separating fields
and eliminating existing joint use capability. As a
result, some fields are no longer available, which
increased the demand for community sports field
areas.
In 1997, the Community Services Department
completed a strategic plan, addressing
issues within the department and providing
recommendations toward their resolution.
During the Anaheim Parks Plan process it was
evident that the information contained in the
1997 strategic plan was still relevant but needed
updating to reflect the ever changing conditions in
Anaheim.
Many of the City’s 63 parks were developed in
the mid-to-late 20th century, during Anaheim’s
main growth period. As the park system and the
infrastructure age, upgrades need to be made to
prevent the deterioration of existing facilities.
Over the years, irrigation systems have been
replaced, restrooms rebuilt, security and ball
field lighting upgraded, and children’s play areas
revitalized, but much more remains to be done.
Unfortunately due to the heavy use of these
facilities, many require replacement or upgrade. In
addition, related electrical, storm drain, hardscape
and other infrastructure also need replacement
or upgrades to ensure they remain useful to our
residents and visitors.
Anaheim Parks Plan
10
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- What We Heard
W
h
a
t
W
e
H
e
a
r
d
In order to reach the community, the Anaheim
Community Services Department, in conjunction
with the City’s Communications Office, recently
designed a new look for “Andy Anaheim,” a
long-time City logo, which depicted Andy in
several costume images. These included Andy as
a park ranger, a baseball player, a soccer player
and a friend of the trees. These logos were used
on various public outreach campaigns to obtain
information from the public about how they use
their local parks.
Community input was vital to the development
of the Anaheim Parks Plan. In order to obtain that
input, an outreach program was developed to
solicit community feedback. The program included
a branding tag line entitled “Planning for Parks,
Share Your Vision.” This tagline provided the
public with a recognizable brand to headline a
public opinion survey. The survey was comprised
of nine questions designed to provide information
needed for the report. The survey period ran
from April 22, 2017 to Sept. 23, 2017, with almost
7,000 responses collected. Those responses
were tabulated and the information provided was
considered in the final recommendations for the
report.
In addition to the online survey process, the
community outreach effort included staff and
Project SAY (Save a Youth) volunteers collecting
survey responses from event participants at
summer concerts and movie nights at Pearson
and Ronald Regan Parks, the W.A.N.D. Western
Barbeque at Twila Reid Park and at neighborhood
district meetings and other events. Approximately
one-half of the survey responses were generated at
these events.
Several groups assisting staff in developing
the Anaheim Parks Plan provided additional
opinions and direction. These included the
City Council Working Group, made up of three
council members and their aides, staff from the
Community Services Department and the City
Manager’s Office; a Technical Advisory Committee
made up of staff from other City departments; and
a steering committee comprised of representative
facility users, outside providers and the
community-at-large. The acknowledgment section,
page 4, provides a listing of committee members.
Staff also solicited input from stakeholders (facility
users) through the six city council district meetings.
Additionally, staff evaluated parks plans from other
jurisdictions, researched national park guidelines
to determine facility needs, and considered
City demographic changes since the last time a
strategic plan was prepared in 1997.
The information compiled through these efforts
was used to develop the Anaheim Parks Plan.
11
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan
Wh
a
t
W
e
H
e
a
r
d
Anaheim Parks Plan
12
DRAFT 4,11 2018
In order to assess the needs of the community, the Department prepared an opinion survey providing questions for park users and others concerning City
parks. The survey was available online in English and Spanish on the City’s webpage and at numerous public events and meetings from April 22 (Earth Day)
through Sept. 23, 2017. During that time, 6,897 surveys were collected. The survey consisted of nine questions to assess the wants and needs of people using
the parks. The questions and general responses to each are below:
- What We Heard: Survey Results
W
h
a
t
W
e
H
e
a
r
d
:
S
u
r
v
e
y
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
Question 1 -
In my neighborhood, parks are:
Question 2 -
How often do you use Anaheim parks or
facilities?
Based on this graph, 73% of survey respondents
used Anaheim parks at least once per month.
Most people taking the survey (62%) felt the
number of parks in their neighborhood was about
right.
Too Many
2%
Weekly
39%
Monthly
19%
Daily
15%
6-7 times a year
10%Less than 6
times a year
9%
I don’t use them
8%
Too Few
36%
About Right
62%
Question 3 -
What parks do you visit?
Each “Andy” represents 50 visits to each park, results rounded up to the nearest 50
Pearson Park
Ronald Reagan Park
La Palma Park
Peralta Park
Boysen Park
Maxwell Park
Modjeska Park
Ponderosa Park
Eucalyptus Park
John Marshall Park
Juarez Park
Oak Canyon Park
and Nature Center
Brookhurst Park
Anaheim Parks Plan
13
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Question 4 -
What’s most important at a park?
Question 5 -
What would you like to see more of?
Wh
a
t
W
e
H
e
a
r
d
:
Su
r
v
e
y
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
B
a s e b a l l a n d Softball
F
i
e
l
d
s
C o m m u n i t y Cent
e
r
s
S e n i o r C enters
D o g Parks
D o g P arks
V o l l e y b all Cou
r
t
s
N a t i v e plants
P i c k leball
B a s k e t b all Co
u
r
t
s
G y m n a sium
s
E x e r c i s e Statio
n
s
G y m n a sium
s
S o c c e r a n d F ootball
F
i
e
l
d
s
S e n i o r C enters
O p e n S p a c e and T
r
a
i
l
s
V o l l e y b a ll Court
s
W a t e r Play
B a s k e t b a ll Court
s
L i g h ting
T e n n i s Courts
E x e r c i s e Statio
n
s
S w i m m i ng Po
ols
P i c n i c F acilitie
s
S k a t e Areas
O p e n S p a c e and T
r
a
i
l
s
P i c k l eball
S o c c e r a n d F ootball
F
i
e
l
d
s
P l a y g r o u n d s and T
o
t
L
o
t
s
B
a s e b a l l a n d S oftball
F
i
e
l
d
s
P i c n i c F acilitie
s
S p e e d S o ccer Fie
l
d
s
P u b l i c Art
T r e e s a n d L andsc
a
p
i
n
g
C o m m u n i ty Cent
e
r
s
P l a y g r o u n d s and T
o
t
L
o
t
s
T e n n i s Courts
W a t e r Play
R e s t r ooms
S w i m m i ng Po
ols
R e s t r ooms
S k a t e Areas
As can be seen by the survey results, the needs of the community are varied, but basic park facilities such as restrooms, playgrounds and tot lots, and picnic
facilities rank as the high demand needs.
Restrooms, playgrounds and tot lots, picnic
facilities, trees and landscaping, and park lighting
were high demand needs. This might indicate a
desire for family, comfort, safety and beauty at
Anaheim parks.
12%10%9%7%7%6%6%6%
3.7%
5%
5%5%5%4%3%3%3%3%1%
5.5%
4.5%
3.6%
5.8%
4.7%
3.7%
5.4%
4.4%
0.3%
5.5%
4.4%
3.5%
5.3%
4.2%
5.2%
4.1%
4.9%
4.1%
4.8%
4%
4.7%
3.7%
Active Use
Passive Use
Anaheim Parks Plan
14
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Question 7 -
Do you feel safe at Anaheim parks?
Question 6 -
What is the condition of your local park?
Excellent
City
Wide
City
Wide
Good
Fair
Poor
City Council
Districts
City Council
Districts
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
Not Safe
Somewhat
Safe
Safe
Very
City-wide, 62% of the survey respondents
felt the condition of their local park was
either excellent or good. On a district
by district basis, at least 50% of the
respondents thought their park was in
excellent or good condition. It was also
apparent that many respondents felt
conditions could be improved.
Park safety was a significant concern of
many survey respondents while 56% of the
respondents City-wide thought the parks
were very safe or safe. On a district by
district basis, results indicated the parks
had safety concerns to be addressed.
Results from City Council Districts 1, 2,
and 4 indicated that more than 50% of the
respondents felt the parks were unsafe.
W
h
a
t
W
e
H
e
a
r
d
:
S
u
r
v
e
y
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
- What We Heard: Survey Results
17%13%
11%
16%14%18%
34%
30%36%29%
37%37%
46%38%
35%38%44%36%37%
17%
34%
18%13%16%
11%12%
3%
10%
20%13%
12%
20%16%
34%
20%
34%
44%38%44%41%44%42%
26%30%28%26%32%
17%
26%
20%13%
22%
10%11%
5%
12%
Anaheim Parks Plan
15
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Wh
a
t
W
e
H
e
a
r
d
:
Su
r
v
e
y
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
Question 9 -
What Anaheim City Council District do you live in?
Survey Question #8 -
Anything else you’d like to share about a specific Anaheim park?
Originally, this particular question was intended to provide an option for a survey responder to identify something they felt was needed at the park that was not
covered by the other survey questions. While there were responses concerning the need for various park improvements or how much they liked Anaheim parks,
a significant number of responses dealt with overall issues concerning the homeless, park security and safety, restroom conditions and the need for additional
park supervision (i.e. Park Rangers, more maintenance staff presence etc.). Recommendations to address these issues are included in the Anaheim Parks Plan.
8%5%
13%9%
11%
13%
8%
I don’t live in
Anaheim
I don’t
know ?33%
1
2 3
4
5 6
This map shows the percentages of respondents by City Council
District. As previously indicated this survey was available online and
at various City sponsored events and activities.
Anaheim Parks Plan
16
DRAFT 4,11 2018
The 2010 U.S. Census indicated the city of
Anaheim had 336,265 residents. In 2016, the
citizens of Anaheim voted to divide the city into
six separate districts. Using the 2010 Census
population figures, each district had approximately
56,000 residents.
The City has a current standard of two acres of
parks per 1,000 residents. The City’s current park
acreage consists of 689.2 acres. When that figure
is applied against the City open space standards,
the standard is being exceeded citywide by 15.07
acres. On a district by district level this is not the
case. With the exception of City Council District 6,
the other five districts do not meet the two acres of
parks per 1,000 residents.
Looking to the future, the Anaheim Parks Plan was
developed to identify how additional parkland
might be obtained to offset the deficit by district
and provide additional parkland to meet the
needs of future residents. The Anaheim Planning
Department and California State University
Fullerton Center of Demographic Research were
requested to provide a population projection
to the year 2025 that could determine how that
population would compare to the two acres of
parks per 1,000 resident standard. That population
statistic is projected to be 367,390 or an increase
of 31,025 residents over the 2010 population.
Potential new parks and open space opportunities
were then evaluated throughout the city. These
were restricted to public and quasi-publicly
owned properties, as those may be more readily
available to acquire for park use through joint-
use and similar types of agreements, without
the expense of purchasing privately owned
properties. Additionally, within the City, there are
very few privately owned vacant parcels where
acquisition makes sense. While there are publicly
owned vacant properties, many of those are being
proposed for low to moderate income housing,
which is also a significant need within the City.
After reviewing the public and quasi-public
lands it was determined that the potential for
developing new parks and open space citywide
could be as much as 1152.3 acres. These potential
areas primarily consist of Southern California
Edison utility rights-of-way, Orange County
Water District and Orange County Flood Control
District properties, and undeveloped City owned
properties under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim
Community Services, Utilities and Public Works
Departments. Additional sites include athletic
fields and facility upgrades to those belonging to
the Anaheim Union High School District and the
Orange Unified School District. The table below
shows the application of the City parks standard to
the 2025 projected population.
If the potential 1152.3 acres were actually acquired
and constructed as parks, the city open space
to resident ratio would be 3.1 acres of parks per
1,000 residents based on projected population in
2025.
While not counted in the City’s open space
standard, there are large parcels of Orange County
and State of California parks and open spaces that
total an additional 2,642 acres in the eastern part
of the City. Additionally there are many miles of
trails belonging to the county along the Santa Ana
River and to the City in the East Anaheim area.
These facilities are largely undeveloped, except
for Yorba Regional Park, and have limited public
access.
Residents have a variety of different resources to
meet their parkland needs. City parks generally
have active sports fields and smaller neighborhood
parks that are used for picnicking or children’s play.
National, state or county parks typically have more
habitat and open space and are used for hiking
and camping. Private parks may be located within
a housing development or apartment complex
and are available only to the residents of that
development.
All housing development projects, including
single-family homes and apartment communities,
are required to provide onsite private and common
open space to serve the needs of its residents
under zoning regulations. For single-family homes,
these can include onsite private open space
or shared large outdoor common open space.
Apartment communities can include private patios
and balconies as well common amenities ranging
from open courtyards, pools, tot lots, community
rooms, etc. These private amenities are seen as an
extension of parks since they also serve to promote
resident healthy living and improved quality of life.
- Where We Are: People and Parks
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
:
P
e
o
p
l
e
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
s
Year Population Park Acres Acres/1,000
2010 336,265 689.2 2.05
2025 367,390 744.8 2.02
(57.18)
An additional 57.18 acres of parks are needed to
meet the projected 2025 population.
Projected Parks Needs 2025
POPULATION
336,265
CURRENT CITY OF ANAHEIM PARK ACREAGE 687.6 ACRES
1 2 3
4
5 6
17
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan
In 2008, the California State Legislators enacted
the Statewide Park Program. This program defined
underserved communities as those having a park
to resident ratio of less than 3 acres of parks
per 1,000 residents. This is important because
it identifies areas where surrounding population
density may overwhelm limited park space. The
State of California did not identify Anaheim as
being one of the underserved communities, largely
because the county and state properties are
considered with the City parks as a whole.
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
:
Pe
o
p
l
e
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
s
- Where We Are: People and Parks
Anaheim Parks Plan
18
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where we are: Park Acreage Standards
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
:
P
a
r
k
A
c
r
e
a
g
e
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
As indicated earlier, the city of Anaheim has an
adopted acreage standard for the provision of
park area of 2 acres of parks per 1,000 residents.
Unfortunately, this is lower than neighboring cities,
and the county unincorporated areas. Examples
of the nearby park acreage standards based on
number of acres of parks per 1,000 residents are
depicted below.
There are opportunities for the City to exceed the
acreage standard though the acquisition of open
space on public and quasi-public properties. As
the City is approaching build out, changing the 2
acres of parks per 1,000 residents standard does
not appear feasible. To do so would require a
revision to the City’s park dedication ordinance,
which could significantly increase developer
fees for residential development. The City can
exceed it’s acreage standard without increasing
the standard and the attendant costs by working
with other agencies and purchasing properties as
opportunities are presented.
Other types of standards and guidelines reviewed
were those of the National Recreation and Parks
Association (NRPA) and the Trust for Public
Land (TPL) “2017 Park Facts.” Both of these
organizations have identified guidelines that refer
to the provision of park and recreation facilities.
When reviewing these guidelines, it is important
to note that these are only meant to serve as a
guide. Implementation of the numbers indicated
may be prohibitive and unrealistic for some, each
jurisdiction needs to determine what is most
appropriate for them. Appendix A contains a
spreadsheet indicating Anaheim’s existing facilities
and how they compare with the TPL national
averages.
The city selected the TPL national averages as
these are recognized industry standards and are
evaluated yearly on a national basis.
City of La Habra Park Standard
Orange County Parks Standard City of Brea Standard
Surrounding Cities Park Standards
City of Fullerton Standard
City of Anaheim Standard City of Westminister Park Standard
1,000
RESIDENTS 2
ACRES
Park Area
1,000RESIDENTS
1,000
RESIDENTS 3
ACRES
Park Area
2.5
ACRES
Park Area
1,000
RESIDENTS
Park Area
5
ACRES
1,000RESIDENTS
Park Area
4
ACRES
1,000
RESIDENTS
Park Area
3
ACRES
Anaheim Parks Plan
19
DRAFT 4,11 2018
The City of Anaheim currently has several different
categories of parks. These categories include neighborhood
parks, community parks, mini-parks and special use
facilities. Of the 63 parks presently in the system, there are
nine community parks, 23 neighborhood parks, 19 mini-
parks and 12 special use facilities. The following maps show
the locations of the existing parks and facilities in the City
of Anaheim, and the locations of neighboring city parks that
are within Anaheim’s immediate vicinity.
Anaheim Parks Plan
20
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are - Current Parks Map
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
:
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
s
M
a
p
$
&$
'
$
'$
#
'
'
$
$
'
'
$
"'
"'
'
&
'
'
'
"
'
#
$
'
'''"
"
'
"
"&
&
#
"
$
#
#
'
'
#
'
&
&
$
'
&
&
'
&
"
!
^
^
^
!
!
§¨5
§¨5
|91
|91
|57
|57
|55
|241|91
W E S
T E R
N A V E
B E A C H B L V D
H A R
B O
R B L V D
S U N K I
S T S T
S U N K I
S T S T
ORA NG E AVE
E M I R A L O M A A V E
E SA NTA ANA CA NYON RD
S E U C
L I D S T
W B ROADWAY
E BALL RD
W KATEL LA AVE
E L A P A L M A A V E
E N O H L R A N C H R D
N T U S T I N A V E
E S E R R A N O A V E
S
E
A
S
T
S
T
S S T A T E C
O L L E G E B L V D
N E U C
L I D S T
W BAL L RD
S W A L N
U T S T
N
E
A
S
T
S
T
S B R
O O K H U R S T S T
S L E W
I S S T
E CANYON RIM RD
CER RITOS AVE
E ORA NGETH ORPE AVE
E R I V E R D A L E A V E
N I M P E R
I A L H W Y
CRES CENT AVE
S N
I N T H S T
S
W
E
I
R
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
S M
A G N O
L I A A V E E S A N T A A N A S T
N L A
K
E V I E W A V E
N
M
I
L
L
E
R
S
T
S H
A S T E
R S T
N B R O
O
K H U
R S T S T
S G I L
B E R T S T
E ORA NG EWOOD AVE
N A C
A C I A S T
S I M P E R I A L H W Y
E P A R K L N
E CH AP MA N AVE
N D A
L E A V E
S FAIRM
ONT BLVD
E CROWTHER AVE
E O AK C ANYON DR
N J
E F F
E R S O N S T
K N O
T T A V E
S
M
A
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R A
V
E
N P L A C E N T I A A V E S R
I C H
F I E L D R D
W C HAPM AN AVE
N
G
L
A
S
S
E
L
L
S
T
N Y
O
RB
A LIN
D
A BLV
D
S
N
O
H
L
R
A
N
C
H
R
D
S
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
N S A N T I A G O B L V D
N L E
M O N S T
BAL L RD
N K E L L O G G D R
S M E A T S A V E
N O H L R A N C H R D
LI NCO LN AVE
N T H E C I T Y D R
N
F
A
I
R
M
O
N
T
B
L
V
D
W ORAN GEW OOD AVE
E L A P A L M A A V E
N D A
L E A V E
W CHAPM AN AVE
S O U T H S T
W C E RRITOS AVE
E O R A N G E T H O R P E A V E
W CRE SCENT AVE
E ORA NG E TH ORPE AVE
31
37
15
18
29
206
53
40
11
1
25
39
61
33
4847
13 16
4
24
46
21
10
23
51
55
60
17
45 5042
8
22
43
2
5
32
28
49
63
19
58
44
35
62
57
14
34
26
41
9
12
36
52
30
38
7
3 27
59
54
56
4185
Park Types
"Commu nity (9)
$Mini (10)
#Natur e (6)
'Neigh borh ood (23)
&Pocke t (9)
^Recre atio n Center (3)
!Special U se (3)
City Boundary
°0 1 2
Miles
Existing Park s & Facilities
April 11, 2018
23 Pearson Park49Pelanconi Park48Peralta Canyon Park6Peter Marshall Park42Pioneer Park35Ponderosa Park45Rio V i sta Park47Riverdale Park63Ronald Re agan Park60Roosevelt Park18Ross Park20Sage Park4Schweitze r Park14Stoddard Park61Sycamore Park2Twila Re i d Park56Walnut Canyon Reservoi r33Walnut Grove Park3West Anahe i m Youth Ce nte r17Willow Park52Yorba Park
19 Founders' Park26Friendship Plaza Park29George Washi ngton Park1Hansen Park50Imperialpark9John Marshal l Park43Juarez Park30Julianna Park22La Pal ma Park39Lincoln Park25Little Pe opl e 'S Park37Magnolia Park21Manzanita Park5Maxwell Park41Miraloma Park13Modjeska Park55Oak Canyon Nature Ce nte r53Oak Park46Olive Hi l ls Park16Palm Lane Park34Paul Re vere Park
44 Anaheim Coves54Anaheim Hil l s El e me ntary School58Anaheim We tlands Park11Barton Park38Boysen Park8Brookhurst Park62Canyon Ri m Park10Chaparral Park12Circle Park31Citrus Park32Colony Park28Colony Square36Coral Tre e Park24Cottonwood Park57Deer Canyon Park7Delphi Park27Downtown Communi ty Ce nter & Gymnasi um59East Anahe i m Communi ty Ce nter & Gymnasi um40Edison Park15Energy Fie l d Park51Eucalyptus Park
Figure 1.0
21
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
s
M
a
p
$
&$
'
$
'$
#
'
'
$
$
'
'
$
"'
"'
'
&
'
'
'
"
'
#
$
'
'''"
"
'
"
"&
&
#
"
$
#
#
'
'
#
'
&
&
$
'
&
&
'
&
"
!
^
^
^
!
!
§¨5
§¨5
|91
|91
|57
|57
|55
|241|91
WES
TER
N AVE
BEACH BLVD
HAR
BO
R BLVD
SUNKI
ST ST
SUNKI
ST ST
ORANGE AVE
E MIRALOMA A V E
E SANTA ANA CA NYON RD
S EUC
LID ST
W BROADWAY
E BALL RD
W KATELLA AVE
E LA PALM A A V E
E N O H L R A N C H R D
N T U S T I N A V E
E S E R R A N O A V E
S
E
A
S
T
S
T
S STATE C
OLLEGE BLVD
N EUC
LID ST
W BALL RD
S WALN
UT ST
N
E
A
S
T
S
T
S BR
OOKHURST ST
S LEW
IS ST
E CANYON RIM RD
CERRITOS AVE
E ORANGETHORPE AVE
E R I V E R D A L E A V E
N I M P E R
I A L H W Y
CRESCENT AVE
S N
INTH ST
S
W
E
I
R
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
S M
AGNO
LIA AVEE SANTA ANA ST
N L A
K
E V I E W A V E
N
M
I
L
L
E
R
S
T
S H
ASTE
R ST
N BRO
O
KHU
RST ST
S GIL
BERT ST
E ORANGEWOOD AVE
N AC
ACIA ST
S I M P E R I A L H W Y
E PARK LN
E CHAPMAN AVE
N DA
LE AVE
S FAIRM
ONT BLVD
E CROWTHER AVE
E OA K C ANYON DR
N J
E F F
E R S O N S T
KNO
TT AVE
S
M
A
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R A
V
E
N PLACENTIA AVE S R
I C H
F I E L D R D
W CHAPMAN AVE
N
G
L
A
S
S
E
L
L
S
T
N Y
O
RB
A LIN
D
A BLV
D
S
N
O
H
L
R
A
N
C
H
R
D
S
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
N S A N T I A G O B L V D
N LE
MON ST
BALL RD
N K E L L O G G D R
S M E A T S A V E
N O H L R A N C H R D
LINCOLN AVE
N THE CITY DR
N
F
A
I
R
M
O
N
T
B
L
V
D
W ORANGEWOOD AVE
E L A P A L M A A V E
N DA
LE AVE
W CHAPMAN AVE
SOUTH ST
W CERRITOS AVE
E ORANGETHORPE AVE
W CRESCENT AVE
E ORA NG E THORPE AVE
31
37
15
18
29
206
53
40
11
1
25
39
61
33
4847
1316
4
24
46
21
10
23
51
55
60
17
45 5042
8
22
43
2
5
32
28
49
63
19
58
44
35
62
57
14
34
26
41
9
12
36
52
30
38
7
327
59
54
56
4185
Park Types
"Community (9)
$Mini (10)
#Nature (6)
'Neighborhood (23)
&Pocket (9)
^Recreation Center (3)
!Special Use (3)
City Boundary
°012
Miles
Existing Park s & Facilities
April 11, 2018
23 Pe arson Park49Pelanconi Park48Peralta Canyon Park6Peter Marshall Park42Pioneer Park35Ponderosa Park45Rio V i sta Park47Riverdale Park63Ronald Reagan Park60Roosevelt Park18Ross Park20Sage Park4Schweitzer Park14Stoddard Park61Sycamore Park2Twila Rei d Park56Walnut Canyon Reservoi r33Walnut Grove Park3West Anahe i m Youth Cente r17Willow Park52Yorba Park
19 Founde rs' Park26Friendship Pl aza Park29George Washington Park1Hansen Park50Imperialpark9John Marshal l Park43Juarez Park30Julianna Park22La Pal ma Park39Lincoln Park25Little Pe opl e'S Park37Magnolia Park21Manzanita Park5Maxwell Park41Miraloma Park13Modjeska Park55Oak Canyon Nature Ce nte r53Oak Park46Olive Hi l ls Park16Palm Lane Park34Paul Revere Park
44 Anahe im Coves54Anaheim Hi ll s El eme ntary School58Anaheim We tlands Park11Barton Park38Boysen Park8Brookhurst Park62Canyon Ri m Park10Chaparral Park12Circle Park31Citrus Park32Colony Park28Colony Square36Coral Tre e Park24Cottonwood Park57Deer Canyon Park7Delphi Park27Downtown Communi ty Ce nte r & Gymnasi um59East Anahe i m Communi ty Ce nte r & Gymnasi um40Edison Park15Energy Fi e l d Park51Eucalyptus Park
$
&$
'
$
'$
#
'
'
$
$
'
'
$
"'
"'
'
&
'
'
'
"
'
#
$
'
'''"
"
'
"
"&
&
#
"
$
#
#
'
'
#
'
&
&
$
'
&
&
'
&
"
!
^
^
^
!
!
§¨5
§¨5
|91
|91
|57
|57
|55
|241|91
WESTER
N AVE
BEACH BLVD
H A R B O R B L V D
S U N K I
S T S T
S U N K I S T S T
ORANGE AVE
E M I R A L O M A A V E
E SANTA ANA CA NYON RD
S E U C L I D S T
W BROADWAY
E BALL RD
W KATELLA AVE
E L A P A L M A A V E
E N O H L R A N C H R D
N T U S T I N A V E
E S E R R A N O A V E
S
E
A
S
T
S
T
S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D
N E U C L I D S T
W BALL RD
S W A L N
U T S T
N
E
A
S
T
S
T
S B R O O K H U R S T S T
S L E W
I S S T
E CANYON RIM RD
CERRITOS AVE
E ORA NGETHORPE AVE
E R I V E R D A L E A V E
N I M P E R I A L H W Y
CRESCENT AVE
S N
I N T H S T
S
W
E
I
R
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
S MAGNOLIA AVE E S A N T A A N A S T
N L A K E V I E W A V E
N
M
I
L
L
E
R
S
T
S H A S T E R S T
N B R O O K H U R S T S T
S GILBERT ST
E ORANGEWOOD AVE
N A C A C I A S T
S I M P E R I A L H W Y
E P A R K L N
E CHAPMAN AVE
N DA
LE AVE
S FAIRMONT BLVD
E CROWTHER AVE
E OAK C ANYON DR
N J E F F E R S O N S T
KNOTT AVE
S
M
A
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R A
V
E
N P L A C E N T I A A V E S R I C H F I E L D R D
W CHAPMAN AVE
N
G
L
A
S
S
E
L
L
S
T
N YORBA LIN
D
A BLVD
S
N
O
H
L
R
A
N
C
H
R
D
S
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
N S A N T I A G O B L V D
N L E M O N S T
BALL RD
N K E L L O G G D R
S M E A T S A V E
N O H L R A N C H R D
LINCOLN AVE
N T H E C I T Y D R
N
F
A
I
R
M
O
N
T
B
L
V
D
W ORANGEWOOD AVE
E L A P A L M A A V E
N DA
LE AVE
W CHAPMAN AVE
S O U T H S T
W CERRITOS AVE
E O R A N G E T H O R P E A V E
W CRESCENT AVE
E ORA NGETHORPE AVE
31
37
15
18
29
206
53
40
11
1
25
39
61
33
4847
13 16
4
24
46
21
10
23
51
55
60
17
45 5042
8
22
43
2
5
32
28
49
63
19
58
44
35
62
57
14
34
26
41
9
12
36
52
30
38
7
3 27
59
54
56
4185
Park Types
"Community (9)
$Mini (10)
#Nature (6)
'Neigh borhood (23)
&Pocket (9)
^Recreation Center (3)
!Special U se (3)
City Boundary
°012
Miles
Existing Parks & Facilities
April 11, 2018
23 Pearson Park49Pelanconi Park48Peralta Canyon Park6Peter Marshall Park42Pioneer Park35Ponderosa Park45Rio Vi sta Park47Riverdale Park63Ronald Reagan Park60Roosevelt Park18Ross Park20Sage Park4Schweitzer Park14Stoddard Park61Sycamore Park2Twila Reid Park56Walnut Canyon Reservoir33Walnut Grove Park3West Anaheim Youth Center17Willow Park52Yorba Park
19 Founders' Park26Friendship Plaza Park29George Washi ngton Park1Hansen Park50Imperialpark9John Marshall Park43Juarez Park30Julianna Park22La Palma Park39Lincoln Park25Little People'S Park37Magnolia Park21Manzanita Park5Maxwell Park41Miraloma Park13Modjeska Park55Oak Canyon Nature Center53Oak Park46Olive Hil ls Park16Palm Lane Park34Paul Revere Park
44 Anaheim Coves54Anaheim Hills Elementary School58Anaheim We tlands Park11Barton Park38Boysen Park8Brookhurst Park62Canyon Rim Park10Chaparral Park12Circle Park31Citrus Park32Colony Park28Colony Square36Coral Tree Park24Cottonwood Park57Deer Canyon Park7Delphi Park27Downtown Community Center & Gymnasium59East Anahei m Community Center & Gymnasi um40Edison Park15Energy Field Park51Eucalyptus Park
$
&$
'
$
'$
#
'
'
$
$
'
'
$
"'
"'
'
&
'
'
'
"
'
#
$
'
'''"
"
'
"
"&
&
#
"
$
#
#
'
'
#
'
&
&
$
'
&
&
'
&
"
!
^
^
^
!
!
§¨5
§¨5
|91
|91
|57
|57
|55
|241|91
WESTERN AVE
BEACH BLVD
H A R B O
R B L V D
S U N K I S T S T
S U N K I
S T S T
ORANGE AVE
E M I R A L O M A A V E
E SANTA ANA CA NYON RD
S E U C L I D S T
W BROADWAY
E BALL RD
W KATELLA AVE
E L A P A L M A A V E
E N O H L R A N C H R D
N T U S T I N A V E
E S E R R A N O A V E
S
E
A
S
T
S
T
S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D
N E U C L I D S T
W BALL RD
S W A L N U T S T
N
E
A
S
T
S
T
S BR
OOKHURST ST
S L E W I S S T
E CANYON RIM RD
CERRITOS AVE
E ORA NGETHORPE AVE
E R I V E R D A L E A V E
N I M P E R I A L H W Y
CRESCENT AVE
S N I N T H S T
S
W
E
I
R
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
S MAGNOLIA AVE E S A N T A A N A S T
N L A
K E V I E W A V E
N
M
I
L
L
E
R
S
T
S H A S T E R S T
N BROOKHURST ST
S GILBERT ST
E ORANGEWOOD AVE
N A C
A C I A S T
S I M P E R I A L H W Y
E P A R K L N
E CHAPMAN AVE
N DALE AVE
S FAIRM
ONT BLVD
E CROWTHER AVE
E OA K C AN YON DR
N J E F F
E R S O N S T
KNOTT AVE
S
M
A
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R A
V
E
N P L A C E N T I A A V E S R I C H F I E L D R D
W CHAPMAN AVE
N
G
L
A
S
S
E
L
L
S
T
N YO
RBA LIN
D
A BLVD
S
N
O
H
L
R
A
N
C
H
R
D
S
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
H
I
L
L
S
R
D
N S A N T I A G O B L V D
N L E M O N S T
BALL RD
N K E L L O G G D R
S M E A T S A V E
N O H L R A N C H R D
LINCOLN AVE
N T H E C I T Y D R
N
F
A
I
R
M
O
N
T
B
L
V
D
W O RANGEWOOD AVE
E L A P A L M A A V E
N DALE AVE
W CHAPMAN AVE
S O U T H S T
W CERRITOS AVE
E O R A N G E T H O R P E A V E
W CRESCENT AVE
E ORANGETHORPE AVE
31
37
15
18
29
206
53
40
11
1
25
39
61
33
4847
13 16
4
24
46
21
10
23
51
55
60
17
45 5042
8
22
43
2
5
32
28
49
63
19
58
44
35
62
57
14
34
26
41
9
12
36
52
30
38
7
3 27
59
54
56
4185
Park Types
"Commu nity (9)
$Mini (10)
#Nature (6)
'Neighborhood (23)
&Pocket (9)
^Recreatio n Center (3)
!Special U se (3)
City Boundary
°012
Miles
Existing Parks & Facilities
April 11, 2018
23 Pearson Park49Pelanconi Park48Peralta Canyon Park6Peter Marshall Park42Pioneer Park35Ponderosa Park45Rio Vista Park47Riverdale Park63Ronald Re agan Park60Roosevelt Park18Ross Park20Sage Park4Schweitzer Park14Stoddard Park61Sycamore Park2Twila Reid Park56Walnut Canyon Reservoir33Walnut Grove Park3West Anaheim Youth Center17Willow Park52Yorba Park
19 Founders' Park26Friendship Plaza Park29George Washington Park1Hansen Park50Imperialpark9John Marshall Park43Juarez Park30Julianna Park22La Palma Park39Lincoln Park25Little Pe ople 'S Park37Magnolia Park21Manzanita Park5Maxwell Park41Miraloma Park13Modjeska Park55Oak Canyon Nature Center53Oak Park46Olive Hills Park16Palm Lane Park34Paul Revere Park
44 Anaheim Coves54Anaheim Hill s El eme ntary School58Anaheim Wetlands Park11Barton Park38Boysen Park8Brookhurst Park62Canyon Rim Park10Chaparral Park12Circle Park31Citrus Park32Colony Park28Colony Square36Coral Tree Park24Cottonwood Park57Deer Canyon Park7Delphi Park27Downtown Communi ty Center & Gymnasium59East Anahe im Community Center & Gymnasium40Edison Park15Energy Fiel d Park51Eucalyptus Park
Anaheim Parks Plan
22
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are: Current Parks Map
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
:
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
s
M
a
p
§¨5
§¨5
|91
|91
|57
|57
|55
|241|91§¨¦5
§¨¦5
|91
|91
|57
|57
|55
|241|91
Key Features
City of Anaheim Parks
Orange County Parks
State Parks
Adjacent City Parks
Potential Park Sites
Schools
City Boundary
Parks within Anaheim
and Immediate Vicinity
City of Anaheim
GIS Central
November 29, 2017 4185
0 0.25 0.5
Miles °
Figure 2.0
23
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan
§¨5
§¨5
|91
|91
|57
|57
|55
|241|91§¨¦5
§¨¦5
|91
|91
|57
|57
|55
|241|91
Key Features
City of Anaheim Parks
Orange County Parks
State Parks
Adjacent City Parks
Potential Park Sites
Schools
City Boundary
Parks within Anaheim
and Immediate Vicinity
City of Anaheim
GIS Central
November 29, 2017 4185
0 0.25 0.5
Miles °
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
:
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
P
a
r
k
s
M
a
p
Anaheim Parks Plan
24
DRAFT 4,11 2018
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
G
u
i
d
i
n
g
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
a
n
d
P
l
a
n
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
- Where We Are Going: Guiding Principles and Plan Objectives
In the formation of the Anaheim Parks Plan,
staff the technical committee, and the steering
committee agreed to follow certain guiding
principles.
Guiding Principles
• Fully evaluate existing park system
• Park or open space within a 10-minute
walk of all residents
• Inclusive and barrier free park access
• Park amenities
• Maintain the standard of at least 2 acres of
parks per 1,000 residents
• Encourage health
• Promote safety
• Enhance passive and active recreation
• Promote environmental responsibility
• Follow existing policies and add new ones as
appropriate
Plan Objectives
From these guiding principles, the following
objectives were established and incorporated into
the Anaheim Parks Plan:
Enhance and Expand Park System
To accomplish this objective, the City should:
• Strive to have all residents located within a
10-minute walk from a park
• Redesign/redevelop existing park facilities
to better serve the changing needs of the
community
• As possible, develop buildings, such as
resource centers and community centers, as
multi-use facilities
• Where practical, develop or redevelop athletic
fields for dedicated sports uses.
• Acquire and/or build parks
• Vacant city-owned parkland
• Vacant city-owned properties
• Properties owned by other public, school
and utility agencies
• Acquire and develop private property
Give Higher Priority to Maintenance
To accomplish this objective, the City should:
• Obtain additional funding for annual
reoccurring repair and improvement of parks
• Supplement current maintenance with
additional part-time city employees
• Replace outdated restroom buildings and
playgrounds
• Restore and staff additional park maintenance
yards
Connect with Nature and Enhance Appreciation
To accomplish this objective, the City should:
• Connect the public with nature through
the promotion of trails and habitat friendly
landscaping
• Through interpretive outreach, enhance the
appreciation of nature by developing or
improving interpretive facilities and signage
Enhance the Urban Forest
To accomplish this objective, the City should:
• Consider planting new native and other
interesting tree species in parks to increase the
urban forest
• Consider drought tolerant, low maintenance
and native park landscaping
25
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: General Plan UpdateAnaheim Parks Plan
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
In evaluating the park needs of the City, staff
determined that the existing park categories, as
described in the Green Element of Anaheim’s
General Plan¹, should be updated to include
additional categories to better reflect the types
of parks provided by the City. As such, staff
is recommending the addition of three new
categories: the pocket park, the nature park and
the recreation center park. The new categories and
those currently in the system are described below
and are reflected on the improvement matrix,
Appendix B.
Existing Park Categories
The City of Anaheim currently has several different
categories of parks. These categories include
neighborhood parks, community parks, mini-parks
and special use facilities. Of the 63 parks presently
in the system, there are nine community parks, 23
neighborhood parks, 19 mini-parks and 12 special
use facilities. The following describes each of the
park categories:
Pocket Park (new category)
This is a “walk to “ park of less than one acre. It
has no restroom or parking, with no specific service
radius. It serves the immediate area surrounding
the park. Generally providing passive recreational
uses, pocket parks can include picnic facilities,
landscaping, artworks, a children’s play area,
court sports, or other improvements planned
through community involvement. There are no
programmed activities at this type of park.
Mini-parks
Mini-parks which are presently included in the
system as special use parks, are less than 5 acres
in size and provide an opportunity to develop
recreational facilities in areas where larger sized
land parcels are not available. Occasionally, small
lots or parcels may be available after residential
development occurs that could provide the
opportunity to develop a small children’s play
area or picnic facilities in an area that would not
normally have a park. While mainly passive in
nature, depending on the size of the mini-park,
active uses such as hard-courts, volleyball courts,
picnic shelters and other improvements can be
included in the facility. Obviously, the larger the
mini-park, the more amenities can be provided.
Mini-parks typically don’t have restrooms or
parking spaces as these facilities are generally
located close to where the users live. The service
radius of a mini-park is up to one-quarter of a mile.
There are 12 mini-parks in Anaheim.
Neighborhood Parks
A neighborhood park is between 5 and 14 acres
and has a service radius of one-half mile from
the park. Amenities at neighborhood parks are
usually determined through a public participation
processes which can result in a large variety of
facilities including such things as family picnic and
barbecue areas, children’s play areas, paved hard-
court areas, one or more unlighted athletic fields,
and restrooms. Because of demand, the athletic
fields were developed as multi-use fields, usually
a softball field with a soccer overlay. This is not a
hard and fast rule as some neighborhood parks
also have amenities found in larger parks.
Neighborhood parks are considered “walk to”
parks, meaning they are within walking distance
of the residents they serve. Off-street parking
areas are generaly provided for a limited number
of vehicles. Often times these parks are located
next to elementary or middle schools to capitalize
on using the school field areas in conjunction
with the park fields to maximize open space for
the community. Facilities have often been shared
through joint-use agreements with the local school
district. There are 23 neighborhood parks in
Anaheim.
Community Parks
A community park is a much larger park, ranging
from 15 to 50 acres, and serves a much broader
area. For example, Anaheim’s largest community
park is Brookhurst Park at approximately 27 acres.
Amenities at community parks are also determined
largely through public participation. Because of
the broader service radius, the community park
is intended to serve broader needs. Typically,
a community park service radius is up to two
miles from the park. Amenities included at these
parks include those of the neighborhood park,
but on a larger basis, and may contain multiple
lighted athletic fields, large community centers or
recreation buildings and other major recreation
amenities. As with neighborhood parks, the
athletic fields are typically multi-use, with softball
fields being the primary use with a soccer overlay.
There can also be amenities serving a citywide
purpose, such as outdoor theaters, swimming
pools, tennis courts, and similar activities.
Because these parks serve a broader audience,
primary access is by vehicle, although as the parks
are generally located at or near the intersections
of major streets, pedestrian and bicycle access is
also designed for easy access to the park. As with
the neighborhood parks, wherever it was possible
the community parks were located adjacent to
or near middle or high-school facilities to take
advantage of joint-use opportunities. There are
nine community parks in the park system.
Nature Park (new category)
Typically, these are passive oriented recreational
facilities. Each facility is different but will likely have
an off-street parking area, restrooms, open space,
trails and native landscaping. An interpretive
center or signage may also be amenities provided
at this facility to highlight the importance of natural
resources in Anaheim.
1. Anaheim General Plan, May 2004, Green Element, pages
Anaheim Parks Plan
26
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Recreation Center Park (new categry)
This type of facility is a stand-alone recreation
building serving a broad spectrum of the
community. These are programmed buildings or
facilities that can include senior citizen centers,
youth activity facilities, gymnasiums, classrooms
and community programs. These buildings
are 10,000 square feet or greater in size. These
facilities also will have large, off street parking to
accommodate the many program participants.
Family Resource Centers will be included in this
category if a stand along building. There is no
identified service radius for this type of facility.
Special Use Facility
This type of park provides facilities associated with
singular or special uses not occurring with other
facilities. This could include community gardens,
cultural or historic facilities, skate parks, swimming
pool or sports complexes serving the entire city.
These facilities can be stand alone or incorporated
with other recreational uses. As necessary, parking
and other amenities are provided to accommodate
users.
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
- Where We Are Going: General Plan Update
27
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
10
-
M
i
n
u
t
e
W
a
l
k
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
- Where We Are Going: 10-Minute Walk CampaignAnaheim Parks Plan
The Trust for Public Land, the National Recreation
and Park Association and the Urban Land Institute
have developed a campaign establishing the goal
that all Americans should live within a 10-minute
walk of a park or open space. Anaheim, along with
133 other American cities and mayors, has become
a proponent of the 10-minute walk and has
developed a plan to accomplish that goal using
a combination of existing parks, proposed new
parks and school facilities throughout the City. This
plan would require the cooperation of schools and
other government jurisdictions with the City, and
would require the development of joint-use and
other agreements and financing to improve park
access for Anaheim residents.
This program is very important because it
promotes an easy way for people to exercise.
According to an article entitled, “10 Surprising
Benefits Of: A 10-Minute Walk,” by Christa
Avampato¹, in the publication, “Wise Bread,” a
10-Minute Walk can accomplish 10 things.
A 10-minute walk can:
1. Promote heart health
2. Improve brain function
3. Ease depression
4. Improve bone health
5. Burn calories
6. Help you breathe easier
7. Increase mindfulness
8. Reduce stress
9. Improve gait and balance
10. Reduce pain
The Trust for Public Land indicates only 65% of
urban Americans have a park within a 10-minute
walk (or half-mile) of home. By investing in parks
and open spaces and embracing the 10-minute
walk campaign, cities can work to improve the
overall health of their constituency and stay ahead
of increasing public demands for recreational uses.
Residents who live within a 10-minute walk of a
park enjoy a number of additional benefits such as
improved air quality from additional trees in parks.
Similarly, air temperatures are lower in and around
parks because of the urban forest and tree cover
within parks.
In addition, people who reside within a 10-minute
walk of a park, enjoy a more immediate connection
to nature, improved views, are more physically
active, and are less dependent on automobiles
to get to their local park. Also, a recent CNN
report² (April 17, 2017) stated that people who live
near parks enjoy longer lifespans and have fewer
diseases. Studies have also indicated an increase in
land and home values that are in close proximity to
parks and open space.
1. Christa Avampato is the Director of Product Development for Patron Manager and a health education and art advocate. She contributes articles to Wise Bread, the Washington Post,
Huffington Post, The Motley Fool and Royal Media Brothers Publication.
2. CNN Live TV report “Living near nature linked to longer lives”, by Morgan Monella, Special to CNN, Monday April 17, 2017.
Anaheim Parks Plan
28
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: 10-Minute Walk Campaign (2017)
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
1
0
-
M
i
n
u
t
e
W
a
l
k
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
(
2
0
1
7
)
Figure 3.0 indicates areas of the City within a 10-minute walk (1/2 mile) of a park.
§¨¦5
|57
|55
|91
|57
|91
|241
§¨¦5
|91
Key Features
Owned By
City of Anaheim Parks
Orange County Parks
State Parks
City Boundary
Existing Parks within Anaheim
4185
0 0.25 0.5
Miles °
1/2 Mile Radius
City of Anaheim
GIS Central
January 31, 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan
29
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
10
-
M
i
n
u
t
e
W
a
l
k
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
(
2
0
1
7
)
§¨¦5
|57
|55
|91
|57
|91
|241
§¨¦5
|91
Key Features
Owned By
City of Anaheim Parks
Orange County Parks
State Parks
City Boundary
Existing Parks within Anaheim
4185
0 0.25 0.5
Miles °
1/2 Mile Radius
City of Anaheim
GIS Central
January 31, 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan
30
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: 10-Minute Walk Campaign (Potential Buildout)
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
1
0
-
M
i
n
u
t
e
W
a
l
k
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
(
P
B
)
§¨¦5
|57
|55
|91
|57
|91
|241
§¨¦5
|91
Existing and Proposed Parks
within Anaheim and Immediate
Vicinity
4185
0 0.25 0.5
Miles °
City of Anaheim
GIS Central
February 01, 2018
Key Features
City of Anaheim Parks
Orange County Parks
State Parks Adjacent
City Parks
Proposed Park Sites
Schools
City Boundary
10 Minute Walk = 1/2 Mile Buffer
City of Anaheim Parks
Orange County Parks
State Parks Adjacent
City Parks
Proposed Park Sites
Schools
Figure 4.0 indicates how the 10-minute walk can be accomplished using properties owned by the
City, School Districts and various public and quasi-public jurisdictions.
Anaheim Parks Plan
31
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
10
-
M
i
n
u
t
e
W
a
l
k
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
(
P
B
)
§¨¦5
|57
|55
|91
|57
|91
|241
§¨¦5
|91
Existing and Proposed Parks
within Anaheim and Immediate
Vicinity
4185
0 0.25 0.5
Miles °
City of Anaheim
GIS Central
February 01, 2018
Key Features
City of Anaheim Parks
Orange County Parks
State Parks Adjacent
City Parks
Proposed Park Sites
Schools
City Boundary
10 Minute Walk = 1/2 Mile Buffer
City of Anaheim Parks
Orange County Parks
State Parks Adjacent
City Parks
Proposed Park Sites
Schools
Radius
Adjacent City Parks
Anaheim Parks Plan
32
DRAFT 4,11 2018
As the city of Anaheim is nearing buildout,
the ability to develop new parks becomes
more difficult due to the lack of available land.
It becomes necessary for the City to look at
alternatives to provide sufficient recreational
facilities for the enjoyment of its residents.
Thirty-two of Anaheim’s parks were constructed
prior to 1980. While new improvements and
rehabilitation have taken place at each site,
many parks are still in need of irrigation system
upgrades, restroom, concession or other building
renovation or replacement and other facility
improvements.
Neighborhoods have changed and so have the
recreation needs of those using the parks. For
example, softball and baseball fields are still
important activities, but in some areas of the city,
may not be as important as those for soccer field
use. Many softball fields were developed with
soccer field overlays. This practice is no longer as
viable because both soccer and softball experience
year round play. Mounded and rolling hills within
some parks may be better used if redeveloped for
more active uses. Although landscaping is valued
by the community, active recreation is also in very
high demand.
To assist City staff in determining facility needs
for the residents of Anaheim, a public opinion
survey was developed for community input. The
top survey response was for restrooms, followed
closely by trees, playgrounds, picnic facilities
and lighting. Soccer and football field areas
rated higher than softball and baseball fields.
Community centers finished considerably above
senior centers and gymnasiums. Additional
information regarding the survey results can be
found under the What We Heard section.
Restrooms
Restrooms were the highest ranked
facility indicated on the opinion
survey. Currently the City parks
system has 59 restrooms, including
those in onsite park buildings.
Many are in need of renovation or
replacement. The City Council recently authorized
funding to refurbish eight park restrooms to
improve the condition of the buildings. Associated
with restrooms are concerns about homelessness,
security, sanitation and privacy. Various designs
are under consideration to improve restroom
conditions. Sink placement, types of toilet facilities,
lighting, floor surfacing, air freshening, restroom
stalls and doors and other items are being
reviewed for restroom enhancement.
National averages indicate for a city of Anaheim’s
size as many as 26.6 restrooms per 100,000
people could be needed. That would equate to 89
restrooms among Anaheim’s parks.
Recommendation:
The cost for new restrooms ranges from
$250,000 to $500,000, depending on
design and a prefabricated or a build-in-
place structure. As most neighborhood
parks and community parks have one or
more restrooms, an evaluation of each park
must be made to determine if more than
one restroom is needed. Staff recommends
that restrooms are not placed in pocket
parks or mini-parks. The need for restrooms
has been identified for Pelanconi, Barton,
Lincoln, Imperial and Palm Lane parks. These
facilities should be priorities for restroom
development. Additional restrooms should be
considered for community parks only having
one restroom facility in the park. This would
include Ronald Reagan, Modjeska, La Palma
and Peralta parks. As a point of clarification,
La Palma and Peralta parks have restrooms
within the community buildings at the parks,
but those are not readily available to park
patrons at those parks because of proximity
or being unavailable for general park use. As
new facilities develop, restrooms should be
included with the project developments.
Trees, Landscaping and Native Plants
Trees and landscaping were ranked
second in the opinion survey
regarding features people would like
to see more of in Anaheim parks.
One of the proposed objectives in
the Anaheim Parks Plan is to increase
the urban forest by planting new and interesting
tree species in the parks. Because of the heavy
use parks receive, newly planted trees should be
a minimum size of 15 gallon, with 24“ box trees
preferred. In certain cases, especially where a
visual statement is needed, a 36” box tree may be
appropriate. While the larger trees may be slower
growing, it is not practical to put in tree varieties
smaller than the 15 gallon as the smaller trees are
targets for vandalism. Flowering trees or those with
interesting structure or bark patterns should be
considered where possible.
Tree and landscape plantings should be evaluated
on a park by park basis. Plantings should be
clustered to develop groves or define areas within
the parks without disrupting security lighting or
areas of play. Tree plantings should be located
away from hardscape to avoid problems with
roots and branch breakage. Landscape plantings
should be designed to create visual interest,
minimize sightline disruption and prevent hiding
opportunities.
In the early years when Anaheim parks were
first conservation areas, parks were considered
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Needs & Recommendations
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Restroom
Facilities 59 34 93 89
Existing Potential
Additions Total TPL
National Average +
Anaheim Parks Plan
33
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Needs & Recommendations
miniature arboretums, as the tree species varied
and many had numbered identification posts at
the base of the trees. These posts corresponded to
park maps that were available to the public. In this
manner, park visitors could become familiar with
tree species used in the parks and possibly use in
their home landscapes.
Consideration should be given to using native, low
maintenance and drought tolerant plantings. These
could be in demonstration gardens, on slopes
and other areas prone to erosion, or other areas
where reduced water consumption is desired. As
with the tree plantings, native plantings should be
identified so the general public knows what the
plant materials are.
Native plant material use in the parks was rated
in the upper one-third of responses to the survey
questions. Many homeowners have begun using
native plant materials in their gardens. These
provide habitat value, encourage birds and
butterflies, and create a connection to nature.
While not all natives are drought tolerant, many are
and can save water.
There are no national averages reported by TPL for
tree, landscape or native planting but these items
did rank high with public interest on the survey.
Recommendation:
Trees cost between $75 and $500 based on
species. Other landscape costs, including
native landscape, will vary in price and will be
based on specific design considerations. All
parks should be evaluated for tree and other
landscaping improvements.
Children’s Play Areas
Most of Anaheim’s neighborhood
and community parks have children’s
play areas. These play areas are
heavily utilized and are among the
most popular improvements in the
parks. The City is in the process of
updating the older play areas. Since 2011, the City
has partnered with the community and nonprofit
organization, KaBOOM!, to replace play areas
at Willow, Stoddard, Schweitzer, Edison, Lincoln,
Modjeska, Twila Reid, Imperial, John Marshall and
Pearson parks. In addition, the redevelopment of
Barton and Julianna parks will bring new play areas
to those parks by 2019.
Currently there are at least 12 play areas requiring
renovation. These facilities are between 16 and 30
years old. In some cases, replacement playground
parts are no longer available and playground
pieces have been removed or closed to public
use. Parks needing replacement play areas are
identified in the park maintenance and safety
section on page 47.
Because of the heavy use at the children’s play
areas, continual inspection is needed to insure
safety for our youngest residents. As the play areas
age, parts deteriorate and need replacement. This
is an ongoing need.
An item mentioned by many in the survey was
the need for shade in the play areas. Several of
the parks have trees that provide at least partial
shade to the play spaces (Willow and Little
People’s parks). Recently, the City has started
using shade toppers in several of the more recent
park play area renovations (Reagan, Sage and
Sycamore parks). All new play area installations
or renovations, as well as existing play areas,
should include a shade element. Because of fall
zones around the various play equipment pieces,
some play areas may not be candidates for shade
topper installations. Each play area where shade is
needed should be evaluated to determine if it can
be retrofitted for shade toppers. If shade toppers
cannot be installed, additional shade trees should
be considered.
National averages indicate that there is a need for
as many as 23 children’s play areas per 100,000
people. That would equate to 72 play areas in
Anaheim. Currently the City has 51 children’s play
areas.
The Park Maintenance Section on Infrastructure
Needs addresses playground area refurbishments
and replacement projects. As new park
developments occur throughout the City,
play areas should be considered with those
developments.
Recommendation:
Children’s play areas are an important part
of the park system. A play area that needs to
be rehabilitated immediately is Brookhurst
Park. Because this is a large project, costs
are estimated to be between $1 million to
$1.5 million. Play area replacements at the
other parks are estimated to cost $200,000 to
$350,000.
Picnic Facilities and Shelters
Picnic facilities are some of the most
heavily used amenities at Anaheim
parks. Types of picnic facilities include
individual and family picnic areas
where individuals or large groups
use tables for small parties or eating.
These tables are generally scattered about the
park. Group picnic areas include multiple tables
for large gatherings concentrated in certain areas
of the park. Picnic shelters are generally used at
group picnic areas unless designed for individual
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Children’s
Play Areas 51 6 57 77
Existing Potential
Additions Total TPL
National Average +
Anaheim Parks Plan
34
DRAFT 4,11 2018
or small group use. Examples of both are common
within the park system. Most group picnic areas
are located in the larger neighborhood or in
community parks and are reserved for activities
by permit to ensure the facility is available for the
event.
TPL reported no national average date for picnic
shelters.
Recommendation:
Picnic tables cost approximately $2,000 to
$2,500 to purchase and install if the picnic
table slab is available. If no slab is available,
the table and slab will cost between $3,000
and $4,000 each. Costs for shelter usually
range from $95,000 to $250,000 depending
on size and the development preparations
needed (i.e. water, electricity, foundations,
etc). Picnic shelters should be incorporated
into new park developments. Additional
consideration should be given to adding
group picnic shelters at existing community
parks.
Community Buildings
Community buildings are always
in demand. Providing facilities
for classroom and recreation
programming, public meetings,
banquets, wedding venues and more,
the buildings serve as a social hub for
many of our residents. These are usually more than
10,000 square feet in size and can accommodate
large groups of people. Often the building has a
senior citizen component and may be coupled with
a gymnasium or other feature.
The City has three main community center
facilities.
• Brookhurst Community Center located at
Brookhurst Park has extensive senior citizen
and class activity programming, meeting and
banquet rooms.
• The Downtown Anaheim Community Center
and Gymnasium consists of two large buildings
adjacent to the City Hall complex. The
community center has a senior citizen wing,
meeting and banquet rooms, classrooms and
social service offices for the community. A large
gymnasium, with a teen center and boxing ring
workout area, completes the facility. Between
the two buildings is an open grass area with
shaded outdoor fitness stations.
• The East Anaheim Community Center and
Gymnasium is located in a complex, which
also includes the East Anaheim Police Station
and the East Anaheim Branch Library. The
community center offers programmed activities
and meeting space for the community, while
the gymnasium offers youth programming and
gymnasium activities including basketball and
volleyball courts and other activities.
Community centers ranked in the upper one-third
of the opinion survey, while senior citizen centers
and gymnasiums were ranked in the bottom third
of the survey. This disparity may be because the
City’s large recreational building units are mainly
multi-use and located in the same general area.
The city also has other centers that are related
to community center use but on a somewhat
smaller scale. These include the West Anaheim
Youth Center and Gymnasium, Ponderosa Park
Community Center and Gymnasium, the Manzanita
Park Family Resource Center, the Martin Recreation
Center at La Palma Park, the Miraloma Park Family
Resource Center, the Pinney Recreation Center,
Oak Canyon Nature Center and the Citrus Park
Center. Overall, the City has 11 community center
facilities including the small scale centers.
National averages indicate five community building
facilities per 100,000 people. That would equate to
13.4 community center facilities in Anaheim.
Recommendation:
At present, the community center facilities are
relatively evenly distributed throughout the
City. As the Platinum Triangle area continues
to grow, staff should consider building a new
community for area residents to use. Several
parks have community centers as a part of
their master plans. Sycamore Park has a
senior center proposed at the north end of
the park. Modjeska Park has a community
center planned for the large open space
area on Nutwood Street. Pioneer Park has
a community center proposed in the open
play area on Underhill Avenue. Reagan Park
has a proposed community center, but staff
is assessing whether or not the proposed
location can accomodate a building.
While additional centers may be needed in
the future, it appears there may be higher
priorities to consider before developing
another center. The estimated cost to build
is between $10 million and $15 million and
would likely take the shape of a family
resource center in west Anaheim.
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Needs & Recommendations
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Community
Building
Facilities
11 6 17 13.4
Existing Potential
Additions Total TPL
National Average +
Anaheim Parks Plan
35
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Needs & Recommendations
Water Play and Splash Pad Facilities
Survey respondents identified water
play as an important feature they
would like to see more of at our
parks. During planning meetings for
proposed park projects, many of our
youth expressed a desire for these
features as well. The City currently has a splash pad
at Miraloma Park with another under construction
at Ponderosa Park. Water play and splash pads
have broad based appeal because of Anaheim’s
warm climate, few swimming facilities within the
City, and the distance from the ocean or other
swim areas.
There is a national average of 1.5 per 100,000
people. That would equate to five splash pads.
Recommendation:
While the cost of developing water play
or splash pads facilities is high at $400,000
to $500,000 per splash pad, they can
accomodate a lot of user activity in a small
area. In addition to Miraloma and Ponderosa
parks, another water play facility is planned
for Chaparral Park with the intent to develop
several more throughout the City.
Public Art
Public art in the parks is a high
interest indicated in the Park survey.
Many parks have public art installed
as a part of the facility. Examples
include the Madame Modjeska statue
at Pearson Park, the Fountain of the
Arts in the Pearson Park Amphitheater Plaza, the
murals at Citrus and Manzanita parks, the sculpture
at Colony Park, the George Washington Park rose
garden trellis, and the mosaics at Paul Revere
and Ponderosa parks. Artwork adds a visual and
cultural interest to the park environments. It also
provides a unique blend between man-made
beauty and the natural beauty of the parks.
TPL has no reported national data for the provision
of public art in parks.
Recommendations:
The cost to implement public art will vary
based on the piece of art being installed.
The intent of the art would be to reflect the
surrounding neghborhood. Art should be
considered on an opportunity basis.
Swimming Facilities
A need identified by staff and of
medium interest to the community is
the need for more swimming pools
and or a swim complex. Swimming
programs are important because
they teach swimming skills and
water safety. The need for swimming facilites
is intensified during the summer months when
temperatures are at their highest.
Presently, the only municipal pool in the City is
at Pearson Park. In 1978, the original Pearson
Park Plunge was demolished and a new pool
built on the southwest area of the park. For many
years, City programming of this new pool was
supplemented with City scheduled swim programs
at many of the high school pools in the City. While
City-offered swim programs continue at Canyon
High School in east Anaheim, there are no longer
public swim programs at the other high schools
in the City. This is because of the Orange Unified
School District curriculum swim programs and wear
and tear on the facilities.
National averages indicate that there are as many
as 2.4 pools per 100,000 people. That would
equate to eight pools in Anaheim.
Recommendation:
This deficiency could be reduced by utilizing
pools at the various high schools. The joint-
use agreements could include the eight
high school pools. The City may need to
do cost sharing or some other financial
participation to make this proposal work. The
costs associated with the pool uses would
vary depending upon the amount of use
but it is anticipated that public participation
could average 1,000 to 2,100 people per
pool during summer use periods. The cost
to operate a summer program at a high
school pool is estimated to be approximately
$100,000, plus actual facility maintenance
costs. Should the city be required to provide
improvements to a pool as a part of the
negotiations for pool use, those costs would
be determined on a case by case basis.
In addition to the pools at the high schools,
the City should consider developing a swim
complex that could involve year round use
and accommodate competitive private swim
as well as public program opportunities. The
cost to build a swim complex will vary by site
and if property would need to be acquired.
Based on information from an aquatic facility
designer, a conventional city pool could cost
$1.2 million to $2 million, a small indoor
competition or institutional pool complex
would cost between $2.5 million and $4.5
million. A large competition or institutional
facility would cost between $9.5 million and
$14 million. Other features would increase
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Splash
Pads 2 4 6 5
Existing Potential
Additions Total TPL
National Average +
Swimming
Pool
Facilities
1 7 8 8
Existing Potential
Additions Total TPL
National Average +
Anaheim Parks Plan
36
DRAFT 4,11 2018
some of the costs depending on the type of
improvement.
Athletic Fields
Staff also consulted with the
organized sports groups to
determine athletic field needs. At
a meeting with the primary field
users, the overwhelming interest
are for more athletic fields including
a sports complex. Soccer field use continues
to be the greatest need. They also requested
more dedicated field use rather than playing on
multipurpose fields. Currently many of Anaheim’s
fields are multi-use with softball being a primary
use with a soccer field overlay.
Better and additional athletic field lighting was
also a high demand. The most recent field to be
lighted was Canyon Rim Park in 2008. Many of
the park field lighting systems have been in place
for more than 20 years. While the existing ball
field lights are regularly maintained, the lighting is
expensive to operate and replacement light bulbs
are increasingly unavailable because of technology
improvements. Because of the age of many
systems, light poles are nearing life expectancy
and will require replacement.
The desired lighting moving forward is LED
because of its efficiencey and installation. LED
lights provide better light distribution with
minimal overspill into adjacent areas. It is also less
expensive to operate. In addition, LED light poles
require less maintenance over time. For example,
the City’s older light poles have been subjected to
ground moisture and corrosion because the base
of the pole was mounted flush with the ground.
Best practices show that poles should be mounted
on a raised concrete base, eliminating contact
with the moist ground. All new ball field lighting
installations and replacements should use the new
LED light and pole technologies.
The sports groups also requested increased
parking enforcement to restrict RV and similar
vehicles from taking parking spaces all day and
into the night. Additional parking or availability
at Boysen, John Marshall, Pioneer, Riverdale and
Palm Lane parks is a high priority.
The sports groups also have concerns about the
concession buildings. Many are more than 25 years
old. With the exception of the Yorba and Pioneer
park concessions, sports groups constructed the
buildings through long-term agreements with the
City. Due to their age and use, the structures are
deteriorating and in need of renovation. This has
presented problems as the groups traditionally
renovate their buildings with volunteer labor. The
City’s building division is requiring that the groups
have insurance and publicly bid the projects
using prevailing wage provisions instead of their
volunteer efforts. The groups do not have the
funding available to meet those requirements.
Sports have become so popular at the City’s
fields that they occur year round. This increases
the fields’ wear and tear. The sports groups have
suggested using artificial turf instead of natural
turf, as well as the development of both soccer and
softball and baseball sports complexes to reduce
the field deficiency and wear and tear on facilities.
The groups also suggested using the high school
and middle school fields to reduce the demand on
City fields. The City used to schedule the school
fields for organized play, but because of problems
with overuse, trash removal, vandalism and other
issues, the Anaheim Union High School District
stopped City scheduling of the facilities. The
sports groups felt the district and City should work
together to develop a school sports complex on
one or more of the campuses.
It should be noted that the City programs sporting
activities at the Anaheim Elementary School
District school fields. These uses are in addition
to the park athletic fields. Using the elementary
school fields in conjunction with the City fields
allows staff to schedule 128 fields across the City.
Presently, they can accommodate 54,299 youth
and 26,275 adult participants for soccer and
softball field games.
Unfortunately, there are not enough field areas
to accommodate the demand. There is currently
a waiting list for 12 sports organizations and
over the past three years, staff has not accepted
adult soccer team applications. Thirty-one sports
organizations were turned away from field usage
during that time period. Each of these sports
organizations are comprised of many teams.
The stakeholders also suggested more park
maintenance and park ranger staff be available to
supervise the parks. Irrigation systems frequently
need repair and line breaks may go unnoticed
for several days. As a result, there may be field
downtime due to the irrigation repairs. More
supervision could decrease downtime, minimizing
field disruption.
The city currently has 40 soccer and football
fields and 48 softball and baseball fields. National
averages for soccer fields indicates that a city
of Anaheim’s size should have 17.6 soccer fields
per 100,000 people or approximately 59 fields.
There are no national averages for football fields.
National averages for softball and baseball fields
suggest there is a need for 17.6 fields per 100,000
people or 59 for Anaheim. Most of these fields
are considered to be multi-purpose fields. The
multipurpose field has been the Anaheim model
for the park system. However, it is also one that the
sports group stakeholders have requested the City
reevaluate. Staff believes that the development
of sports complexes with designated facilities will
relieve the pressure on the other athletic field
usage, improving facility scheduling.
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Needs & Recommendations
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Anaheim Parks Plan
37
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Needs & Recommendations
Recommendations:
Athletic field activities are a significant form
of recreation in the city of Anaheim. City
fields receive considerable use and since
most sports are no longer seasonal, there is
limited opportunity to take fields out of play
for renovation. Consequently, wear patterns
develop in the turf, which makes maintenance
and user play difficult. As Anaheim is facing
buildout, there are limited opportunities for
the acquisition and development of new field
areas. Additionally, the sports groups have
requested that there be more dedicated field
uses (i.e. soccer fields only for soccer; softball
fields only for softball) with minimal reliance
on field overlay as is the current practice.
New parks using public and quasi-public lands
will not satisfy athletic field needs. While
adding open space and other recreational
opportunities to the park system, large parcel
acquisitions capable of field development are
generally not available.
The City should direct its efforts to the
development of a sports complex at La Palma
Park. This would involve redevelopment of
the west side of the park to include three
soccer fields and other amenities, and the
development of the area north of Glover
Stadium into additional fields. Parking,
lighting and other improvements should be
included. This 19.1 acre project is estimated
to cost approximately $22 million. This could
be divided into two phases. Phase one
development of the west side of the park is
estimated to cost $10.4 million. Phase two
would Include acquisition of the three parcels
and development of the property north of
Glover Stadium and is estimated to cost $11.9
million.
Next, the City should enter into long term
joint-use agreements to schedule the use
of the field areas and other recreational
amenities at the high school and middle
schools in the Anaheim Union High School,
Orange Unified School and Placentia–
Yorba Linda School Districts. Making these
school fields available for public use would
significantly reduce the field demands for
the City. The fields could be used during
off-school use hours. Lighting and field
improvement costs vary by school and the
number of fields used. The City will also
likely need to take some of the operation and
maintenance responsibilities associated with
the improvements and scheduled activities.
These costs need to be determined and
would be subject to negotiations concerning
which fields might become available.
The City should also re-evaluate the existing
fields in the park system to consider updating
ball field lights to determine which could be
turned into dedicated baseball and softball
fields, and lighting currently unlit fields to
increase availability. Again, these costs would
vary by facility and are not a part of this
evaluation. Costs to install lighting systems
on a typical multi-use field are estimated
between $350,000 and $400,000 per field.
While likely part of the joint-use agreements
to be negotiated with the Anaheim Union
High School District, the City should consider
the project that has been planned for the
redevelopment of the Magnolia High School
athletic fields. In 2005, the City proposed to
redevelop the fields to better accommodate
use by the school and the community. As
proposed, the plan would include field
lighting, irrigation and turf upgrades, a
restroom and other improvements at an
estimated cost of $5 million. Unfortunately,
the project did not proceed after the initial
planning efforts due to a lack of agreement
between the City and school district.
The City has proposed other athletic field
developments for some of the Orange
Unified School District facilities including
redeveloping the fields at Canyon High
School, El Rancho Middle School and the
Crescent Elementary School/Peralta Park
complex. The estimated costs for this project
are $3.75 million.
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Soccer/
Football
Facilities
40 23 66 59
Existing Potential
Additions Total TPL
National Average +
Baseball/
Softball
Facilities
48 40 83 59+
Anaheim Parks Plan
38
DRAFT 4,11 2018
The Canyon High School project would
include redeveloping the school’s turf,
irrigation and sports facilities to improve
school and community usage. Field
lighting, restroom, accessibility and other
improvements would also be a part of the
project. The estimated cost for this project is
$1.88 million.
The El Rancho Middle School project consists
of enhancing the soccer and track infield
and baseball field at the school by providing
sports lighting, turf, irrigation and electrical
upgrades to improve school and community
use. This project is estimated to cost
approximately $1.5 million.
Staff should continue to evaluate scheduling
and use trends to accommodate facility use
needs to the greatest extent possible. The
City is currently in negotiations to purchase
Orange County Water District property at Ball
Road and the Santa Ana River. The 19-acre
property will provide for the development
of four lighted ballfields, as well as other
amenities to serve the community. The cost to
acquire and develop the property is estimated
at $25 million.
Skate Parks
Skate parks were in the lower one-
third of community responses on the
public opinion survey, yet they have
been a frequently requested facility.
The City currently has skate parks at
Brookhurst, Miraloma, Palm Lane, Ponderosa and
Schweitzer parks. A grant-funded skate park at
Manzanita Park is soon to be under construction
as a design-build project. Another skate park, the
Logan Wells Memorial Skate Zone, is subject to
fundraising and is proposed for the East Anaheim
Gymnasium facility.
National averages indicate that based on a city of
Anaheim’s size there could be as many as .4 skate
parks per 100,000 people. That would equate to
1.3 skate parks in Anaheim.
Recommendation:
The costs to develop a skate park will vary
by site. It is estimated these costs could
range from a low of $150,000 -$700,000 per
skate park depending on site conditions and
improvements. Beyond the construction of the
Manzanita Park skate park and Logan Wells
skate park, staff is considering additional
skating amenities at Brookhurst Park.
Dog Parks
The City recently opened two dog
parks at La Palma and Olive Hills
parks. A third park is proposed at
Maxwell park. Both dog parks are
heavily used and approximately 1.3
acres in size with separate large and small dog
areas. La Palma dog park was renovated in late
2017 after having received such heavy use that
large areas of grass were worn away, leaving only
dirt. The renovation reduced the grass areas and
replaced it with decomposed granite, which is
better for maintenance. Even with the heavy usage
at both of these parks and many requests for new
dog parks, the public opinion survey did not rank
dog parks high (less than 4 percent) in the survey
results. Based upon the requests from throughout
the City and the usage experienced at these two
parks, staff believes more dog parks are necessary.
At least one dog park per council district should be
considered.
National averages indicate as many as 1.3 dog
parks per 100,000 people. That would equate to
4.3 dog parks in Anaheim.
Recommendation:
Dog parks are very popular. With the success
of the first two parks, staff believes there
should be a dog park in each council district.
While that is less than the national average, it
is a good goal to obtain. Well designed and
functional dog parks are estimated to cost
approximately $1 million each.
Tennis Courts
Tennis courts have also been a
frequent request from the community.
The City has six courts at Pearson
Park, 14 courts at Boysen Park and
six at Olive Hills Park. The courts
at Pearson and Boysen parks are lighted; those
at Olive Hills Park are unlit. A concessionaire
operates the courts at Boysen Park and use is
available by membership or on a pay-to-play basis.
As with the pools and the athletic fields, the City
previously scheduled tennis court uses at Anaheim
high schools but now only schedules special
tournament events. The courts are not scheduled
for general public use at any of the Anaheim Union
High School District campuses or the two other
high school districts in the City.
National averages indicate as many as 18 tennis
courts per 100,000 people. That would equate to
60 tennis courts in Anaheim.
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Needs & Recommendations
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Skate
Park
Facilities
6 3 9 1.3
Existing Potential
Additions Total TPL
National Average +Dog Park
Facilities 2 2 4 4.3
Existing Potential
Additions Total TPL
National Average +
Tennis
Court
Facilities
26 88 114 60
Existing Potential
Additions Total TPL
National Average +
Anaheim Parks Plan
39
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Needs & Recommendations
Recommendation:
Utilize existing high school courts throughout
the City. The joint-use agreement could also
include the use of 114 high school tennis
courts. The City has previously scheduled
use at Loara and Magnolia high school courts
and has discussed court use at Canyon High
School with Orange Unified School District.
Loara has night lighting but may require
renovation. New lighting could be installed
at Magnolia and Canyon high school’s
courts. Costs per court to light would be
approximately $20,000 per court. To build
a new court, the cost is estimated between
$80,000 and $110,000 per court depending
upon site conditions.
Community Gardens
Community Gardens were not
included as a response item in the
general survey. This is because
community gardens are not a current
responsibility of the Community
Services Department. The City
Manager’s Office currently oversees the program.
The Community Services Department will help
identify sites and can provide some support for
constituents using the gardens.
Currently there are four community gardens in the
City. These are located in west Anaheim (Common
Ground), central Anaheim (Wig Wag), south
Anaheim (at Ponderosa Park) and east Anaheim
(adjacent to Sycamore Park).
There are no TPL reported national average
available for community gardens
Recommendation:
Continue to assist community organizers and
the City Manager’s Office in the provision of
community gardens.
New Parks and Open Space
Development
Appendix B provides a matrix of the
potential capital improvements for
both existing parks and for new park
areas that might be developed for
new open space opportunities. While
some areas may have institutional or
other developmental constraints, such as Southern
California Edison transmission line right-of-ways,
or properties with terrain or accessibility issues,
planning for these areas should consider the park
system deficiencies identified in this report to the
extent possible. Amenities such as picnic facilities,
restrooms and children’s play areas should be
considered with each development, as well as
parking and walking trails where appropriate. As
with all developments, funding will be needed to
facilitate the development and future operation of
the areas.
Summary
Pages 32 through 39 address park and facility
needs and provide recommendations for meeting
those needs. This will require resources, both in
land and funding, to provide for the development
of new or replacement improvements. Staff
should continually evaluate the existing system to
see if needs are being met. The survey and other
public input received during the planning process
assisted staff with the identification of those
needs should be periodically reviewed to ensure
needs are being addressed.
Even with the addition of potential facilities
deficiencies will still exist. It will be incumbent
upon staff to continually review community needs
to determine if the deficiencies related to lack of
facilities, as indicated by the community, affect
the department’s service delivery. As possible,
those deficiencies should be addressed.
The needs contained in this plan are not unusual
and are typical for most park systems. Restrooms,
children’s play areas, picnicking facilities and
athletic sports fields are fairly consistent needs
for most jurisdictions. Community centers, swim
and water play facilities, landscaping and similar
amenities are likewise consistent needs found
here and elsewhere. It is the intent of this plan to
provide the recommendations necessary to meet
those needs specifically addressed in this section
and overall at the conclusion of this document.Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
&
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Anaheim Parks Plan
40
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Cost Summary
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Facility Cost Summary
Each equals $200,000
Items are listed by community preference
Restrooms Fitness Zones
$250,000 to $500,000
(per comfort station)
$200,000 to $300,000
(based 10 stations and shade)
$150,000 to $250,000
(based on 1 acre park)
$5 million to $15 million
(Based on 15,000 s.f. building)$300,000 to $500,000
(each)
$50,000 to $100,000
(Based on 1 acre park)
$50,000 to $150,000
(Per shelter)
$400,000 to $500,000
(each)
$150,000 to $200,000
(based on 1 acre park)
$50,000 to $200,000
(based on 1 acre park)
$25,000 to $100,000
(each)
Trees and Landscaping Community Centers
Children’s Play Areas
Native PlantsPicnic Facilities
Water PlayLighting
Public ArtTrails and Open Space
Soccer and Football Fields
Swimming Facilities
$5 million to $15 million
(based on indoor facility)
$2.5 million to $5 million
(10,000 s.f. building)
$2.5 million to $5 million
(10,000 s.f. building)
$150,000 to $250,000
(each)
$50,000 to $75,000
(each)
Basketball Courts
Senior Centers
Gymnasiums
Anaheim Parks Plan
41
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park and Facility Cost Summary
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
Pa
r
k
a
n
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Skate Areas
Dog Parks
Tennis Courts
Speed Soccer Fields
Pickleball Court
$300,000 to $700,000
(each)
$300,000 to $1 million
(each)
$80,000 to $100,000
(each)
$80,000 to $100,000
(each)
$100,000 to $200,000
(based outdoor facility)
$300,000 to $500,000
(each)
$50,000 to $75,000
(each)
Baseball and Softball Fields
Volleyball Courts
Active Use
Passive Use
Anaheim Parks Plan
42
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park Maintenance and Safety
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
One of the core objectives determined by
feedback from the community, the steering and
technical advisory committees and City staff, is to
give higher priority to maintenance. The objective
is broken down into four main objectives which are:
1. Supplement contract maintenance
operations with additional part-time City
employees
2. Restore and staff an additional park
maintenance yard
3. Obtain additional funding for annual
reoccurring repair and improvements of
parks
4. Replace outdated restroom buildings
The objectives were determined because of their
vital importance to insuring Anaheim parks remain
vibrant and receive the necessary funding and
attention of decision makers who allocate funding.
Planning for Parks Survey Results
Survey respondents were asked to rank the
condition of the Anaheim parks they most
frequently visited. The survey results rated
Anaheim parks in the following way:
Survey respondents were also asked to express
their feeling of general safety in Anaheim parks,
Respondents rated this category in the following
way:
Survey results indicate that most people feel
satisfied in the categories of park safety (56
percent rated very safe/safe) and the level of park
maintenance (62 percent rated excellent/good)
in Anaheim parks. However, public sentiment
expressed in the comment portion of the survey,
as well as recent public dialogue in City Council
meetings and other public forums, bolster the
opinion that more attention in these areas is
warranted.
This is especially true as both of the subject areas
are closely related, and a common thread shared
in the opinions of safety and maintenance is
that a greater visibility of City employees in our
parks is desired by the community. To provide
some historical context on the subject of park
maintenance, it is beneficial to provide some
background on how the maintenance of parks has
evolved through the years.
Park Maintenance
Park Maintenance History
Since the creation of parks in Anaheim, beginning
with Anaheim’s first park, City Park, later renamed
Pearson Park, maintenance functions were
performed by City staff. Throughout the years
as our park system grew, the diverse duties
and maintenance tasks required a sizable City
maintenance staff with a large fleet of vehicles and
equipment necessary to address the needs.
During the late 2000s the City faced significant
budgetary challenges and revenue shortfalls. Staff
researched best practices from other California
cities that contracted out their park maintenance
function to determine a direction which would
insure that the City’s parks were well maintained,
but with a reduction in cost. Various cost reduction
strategies were considered and the privatization of
park maintenance operations occurred.
Turf maintenance was first contracted out, followed
by the remaining maintenance functions such as
irrigation repair, trash and litter removal, shrub
and planter maintenance, chemical application
and restroom maintenance. Prior to privatization,
restroom maintenance had been performed by full-
time staff. However due to the poor quality of the
restroom maintenance performed by contract staff,
this function was brought back in-house and is
currently being performed by part-time staff. Eight
full-time employees were retained to oversee the
contracted maintenance functions, perform special
projects, provide support for special events,
and support the daily workload of the remaining
functions that were not contracted out.
Today’s Park Maintenance Operation
In the current blend of the City’s park maintenance,
the majority of the work is carried out by
contracted services and supplemented by nine full-
time field employees and 28 part-time laborers.
Within this model the City is divided into four
maintenance sectors, with each sector consisting
of a number of parks that are geographically
arranged together. The sectors are listed below
with their corresponding parks.
Good
42%
Fair
26%
Excellent
20%
Poor
12%
Not Safe
10%
Very Safe
18%
Somewhat
Safe
34%
Safe
38%
Anaheim Parks Plan
43
DRAFT 4,11 2018
• Brookhurst Sector
Barton, Brookhurst, Brookhurst Community
Center, Brookhurst Skate Park, Chaparral,
Energy, Hansen, John Marshall, Maxwell,
Modjeska, Palm Lane, Peter Marshall,
Ponderosa, Ross, Schweitzer, Stoddard,
Twila Reid and Willow
• La Palma Sector
Colony Square, Downtown Community
Center, Downtown Skate Park, Founders,
George Washington, Glover, Julianna,
La Palma, Manzanita, Martin Recreation
Center, Pearson, Pearson Pool, Pearson
Tennis Courts, Sage and Swan Parking Lot
• Boysen Sector
Anaheim Coves, Boysen, Central Yard,
Citrus, Colony, Cottonwood, Edison,
Juarez, Lincoln, Little Peoples, Pioneer, Rio
Vista, Tree Yard and Walnut Grove
• Peralta Sector
Canyon Rim, Deer Canyon, Equestrian
Trails, Eucalyptus, Fairmont Site, Imperial,
Oak, Oak Canyon Nature Center, Olive
Hills Tennis Courts, Pelanconi, Peralta,
Pinney Recreation Center, Riverdale,
Ronald Reagan, Roosevelt, Sycamore,
Wetlands and Yorba
Each Sector is named after the community park
which is the location of a crew quarters staffed
by two full-time employees, a park maintenance
supervisor, a park maintenance worker and
approximately 6 to 8 part-time laborers. Under
the direction of the supervisor at each sector, City
staff perform various tasks which are not included
in the park maintenance contractor’s area of
responsibility. These areas include but are not
limited to: restroom maintenance, playground
maintenance, fire clearance, special event support
and special projects. The supervisor and park
maintenance worker also work closely with the
contractor through an inspection process to ensure
contractor compliance with the park landscape
maintenance specifications (See Attachment XX).
These improvements are to be followed by the
contractor per the agreements approved by City
Council.
The nature of the majority of our park maintenance
which is now being performed by an outside
contractor is radically different than the “in-
house” park maintenance staff who had formerly
performed all of the landscape maintenance in City
parks for many decades. The largest difference
is the number of hours actually spent in parks by
contract personnel when compared to City staff.
Since contract staff perform specific landscape
maintenance duties for a private “for profit”
business, their approach to the workload is to
perform the duties per the contract specifications
as quickly as possible to increase profit margins
for the company. In contrast, this approach is
different than using City staff to perform the work
because in most cases, City staff had many diverse
duties which made them more visible in parks and
available to the public to address complaints and
provide an additional layer of security for park
patrons.
Costs
When the privatization of maintenance was
completed in Fiscal Year 2010/11, the City was
able to save in excess of $2.9 million. However,
with escalating costs now borne by the firms
who provide the maintenance of our parks, such
as an increase in the minimum wage, required
healthcare and other miscellaneous employment
benefits, costs for contracted park maintenance
have increased since the park privatization began.
Concurrently, during the same time period, labor
and burden rates for City staff have also increased
along with other operational costs such as
equipment and supplies.
As part of the Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget process,
the Finance Department evaluated the estimated
cost of contracted park maintenance with the
estimated cost of in-house staff maintenance
should City staff be brought back to replace
contracted services. The analysis shows an annual
savings of $4.4 million using contracted services.
Objective #1
Alternative Maintenance Plans
While contracted park maintenance services
achieve a significant savings when compared
to the use of in-house staff, one of the distinct
downsides is not having as many City staff in our
parks on a daily basis. Before the privatization
of our park maintenance function, the city
significantly benefited from having a greater
number of City staff in our parks on a consistent
basis. This City’s presence was important to our
residents and provided a sense of security to
park patrons, as well as the capability to provide
more detail to maintenance functions and address
complaints in a more timely fashion.
Following the privatization of park maintenance
functions, some residents have requested that the
City return to a scenario in which park maintenance
is performed by City employees due to the
perception that park conditions would significantly
improve. However, the City’s current park
landscape maintenance contractor has performed
well and is complying with the terms of the
contract to successfully perform the basic duties
such as mowing, trash and litter pick up, shrub
bed maintenance, tree trimming under 15 feet
and irrigation repair. It should be noted that most
of the negative input received from park users
regarding park conditions related to vandalism and
abuse of facilities, overused sports fields, missing
plant material or sparse turf conditions, and
criminal activity. These are not the responsibility of
the contractor unless the repair of damages related
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
Pa
r
k
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
Anaheim Parks Plan
44
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park Maintenance and Safety
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
to these items is directed by City staff. However,
funding for repair and improvement of park
deficiencies has not been consistently allocated in
annual Community Services budgets.
Recently, there has been significant discussion
by City Council on the subject of increasing the
number of City staff in our parks. The desire has
been communicated by the public, particularly by
those who regularly use our parks. To accomplish
the goal of more staff in parks, a few specific plans
should be considered. The Anaheim Parks Plan
below addresses Tenet #2: supplement contract
maintenance operations with additional part-
time City employees, as described in the report’s
objective to give higher priority to maintenance.
Additional part-time staff combined
with contracted services
A hybrid plan using part-time labor to supplement
contracted forces could be implemented which
would provide an additional level of service to
our parks, which would provide closer supervision
and enhanced quality control. In this scenario, all
large community size parks would be staffed with
part-time laborers throughout the day who will also
be assigned selected smaller satellite parks. This
concept could function in the following way:
Tasks
• Supplement daily contracted labor and other
detailed tasks not covered by contract
• Additional trash and litter pickup
• Staff could function as park ambassadors by
interacting with the public
• Clean and check amenities such as signs,
drinking fountains, hydration stations, trash
receptacle lids, railings, water features, etc.
• Report and document graffiti
Staffing
• M-F: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. shift
One person per community park, with a total
of eight laborers
• M-F: 1p.m. to 5 p.m. shift
One person per community park, with a total
of eight laborers
• Sat. and Sun.: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. shift
One person per community park, with a total
of eight laborers
Costs
• $756,000 - Annually for 24 part-time laborers,
each costing $31,500 annually
• $18,000 - Annually for tools, supplies and
equipment
• $150,000 - One-time purchase of six trucks
• $54,000 - Annual truck rent for six trucks
Total first year costs: $978,000
Total ongoing costs after first year: $828,000
The work would be accomplished by having
designated staff responsible for specific parks
which would be visited each day on a rotating
basis to perform the tasks described above. There
are a total of eight main community park locations
with 53 satellite parks planned throughout the
City. The following is a list of community parks and
the accompanying satellite parks that would be
maintained in this scenario:
• Brookhurst:
John Marshall, Peter Marshall,
Chaparral
• Maxwell:
Twila Reid, Hansen, Schweitzer
• Modjeska:
Barton, Palm Lane, Stoddard, Energy,
Ross, Ponderosa, Willow, Circle
• Boysen:
Juarez, Walnut Grove, Paul Revere,
Citrus, Colony, Cottonwood,
Little Peoples
• Pioneer:
Anaheim Coves, Edison, Miraloma,
Lincoln, Rio Vista
• La Palma:
George Washington, Manzanita,
Sage, Founders, Pearson
• Peralta:
Yorba, Pelanconi, Riverdale, Olive Hills
Tennis/Dog, Eucalyptus, Imperial
• Reagan:
Sycamore, Wetlands, Deer Canyon,
Canyon Rim, Anaheim Hills Elementary
School, Oak Park, Roosevelt
The above scenario would improve customer
service and also provide an additional level of
responsiveness to address complaints received
from the public in a more timely fashion.
Objective #2
Restoration of Modjeska Park
maintenance crew
Another potentially significant staffing
improvement would be the restoration of a park
maintenance crew that once staffed the now
vacant park maintenance office at Modjeska Park.
As part of the reduction strategies in the early
2000s, two full-time park maintenance employees
and several part-time laborers were eliminated
when the Modjeska Park crew yard was closed and
the responsibilities were consolidated into one
maintenance yard at Brookhurst Park. Since that
time, our park system has steadily expanded with
more facilities creating the need for additional
service. Additionally, due to an increase in crime,
vandalism, and other unlawful activities, many of
our parks in the west and central areas of Anaheim
now require additional maintenance. Because of
these reasons, the restoration of the Modjeska
crew should be considered so that the needs
Anaheim Parks Plan
45
DRAFT 4,11 2018
of our park system can be met in a more timely
fashion.
The restoration of this crew would have a positive
ripple effect and enable the parks division
to redistribute part-time labor more evenly
throughout the City, to provide better response
time and increased efficiencies for such tasks as
restroom cleaning, playground maintenance,
repairs of damage to facilities due to vandalism
and special tasks. The extra staff would also
provide a more visible presence at our parks
particularly in the west and central portions of the
City.
Below are the estimated costs of restoring the
Modjeska crew quarters including staff salaries,
burden and vehicles. The Anaheim Parks Plan
addresses Tenet #4: restore and staff an additional
park maintenance yard in west Anaheim, as
described in the report’s objective to give higher
priority to maintenance.
First year start Up:
Staffing
• $140,500: Park field supervisor
• $128,330: Park maintenance worker
• $125,000: 4 part-time laborers
• $100,000: 4 one-time vehicle purchases
• $36,000: 4 annual vehicle rents
• $25,000: Tools, supplies and equipment
Total first year costs: $554,830*
Total ongoing costs after first year: $454,830
annually
*Excludes one time vehicle purchase during first
year
Objective #3
Additional Funding for Needed
Maintenance and Repair
The contracting out of many park maintenance
services has led to a decrease in the level of City
staff that were regularly present in our parks.
The loss of the ability to have staff in our parks
to quickly address emergencies, instances of
vandalism and report criminal activity has been
sorely missed. However, the significant cost
savings realized when privatization began has
saved the City a significant amount of funding.
Many maintenance functions such as mowing
cannot be performed competitively by City staff
due to the high cost of the leased equipment
necessary to perform the maintenance functions
combined with the high burden rate that municipal
employees have attached to their salaries. At
this time our contractors are performing well
and fulfilling the contract specifications per the
agreements executed between them and the City.
However, although the maintenance contracts
allow for a contract contingency to be used at the
discretion of City staff for the repair of vandalism,
additional plant material to replace old plants
that have outlived their normal life expectancy, or
plant areas void of plants due to normal wear and
tear, current funding levels do not include funding
for these tasks. The aesthetic appearance of our
parks suffer due to the inability of our contract
staff to adequately address the needs of our parks,
and in some cases, this budget shortfall reflects
negatively on our contractors and also City staff.
To adequately address the needs of our parks
system in such areas as additional plant material
needs, repair, fencing, sports field material (brick
dust), funding for field renovations, and other more
specialized contract services, additional funding of
$360,000 should be allocated to the Community
Services park operations budget. This item
addresses Tenet #4: Obtain additional funding for
annual reoccurring repair and improvements of
parks, as described in the report’s objective to give
higher priority to maintenance.
Objective #4
Park Restrooms
Park restrooms have been a subject of input from
survey respondents as well as the public at large
during public forums and City Council meetings.
In Fiscal Year 2016/17 additional part-time labor
was allocated to perform a second restroom
cleaning on park restrooms. Additionally, all
park restrooms were comprehensively evaluated
by the Public Works and Community Services
departments to determine the specific needs to
improve the functionality and aesthetics of each
restroom building. Seven restroom buildings
were determined to be in need of complete
replacement at a cost of $3.3 million. The
remainder of the restroom buildings were assigned
a cost for the needed improvements. The cost for
the improvements to the 25 restroom buildings
was determined to be $1.7 million. In December
of 2016, the City Council allocated $535,000 in
additional funding to complete the renovations on
the first seven restroom buildings. The funding
needed to renovate the remaining 18 restroom
buildings is $1.2 million. This item addresses
Tenet #4: Replace outdated restroom buildings, as
described in the report’s objective to give higher
priority to maintenance.
Tree Trimming
Survey participants identified trees as important
features in our parks. Anaheim is fortunate to have
many large, mature trees within our older parks,
which greatly enhance the park experience by
providing shade and aesthetic appeal. A well-
balanced tree maintenance program provides
sufficient funding for the needed trimming of trees,
the removal of dead, diseased or dangerous trees,
and also funding for the addition of new trees to
replace trees lost due to removal.
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
Pa
r
k
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
Anaheim Parks Plan
46
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park Maintenance and Safety
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
Currently, annual funding for park tree trimming
allows trees to be trimmed approximately every
9.2 years: the desired frequency for park tree
trimming is 5 years. Due to the inadequate
funding ($100,000) which currently exists in the
Parks Division’s budget for annual tree trimming,
many large trees suffer breakage during wind
events which require funding to be spent on storm
clean-up activity or for necessary tree removals.
The annual tree trimming funding spent on storm-
related damage has steadily increased throughout
the years, which reduces the funding available
for regular tree trimming. Additionally, allocated
funding has not kept up with the increasing costs
of tree trimming. In July 2016, Anaheim’s tree
trimming costs increased by 7 percent further
reducing the current tree maintenance schedule.
Additional funding for park tree trimming, should
be increased by an additional $100,000 to more
adequately address tree issues and provide for
a higher standard of care for park trees, which
are an important component of the City’s urban
forest. This increase in funding would double the
current park tree trimming budget and increase
the frequency of park tree trimming to a 5 year
average trim cycle. This funding will help to
maintain a safe and healthy urban forest, revitalize
parks and neighborhoods, decrease the cost of
emergency corrective pruning or removals and
improve the health of the tree population which
are an integral component of our park system.
Safety
As previously mentioned, the subject of park safety
is closely linked to well-maintained parks. Studies
have shown that park users feel safer in parks that
have finely manicured planters that are filled with
plant material, sports fields with thick, green turf,
with restrooms that are clean and free of graffiti.
Park users also feel a sense of safety when there
is a presence of City staff, such as park rangers
or park maintenance personnel. The addition of
maintenance staff as outlined in proposals I and II
above will aid in providing more staff members in
our parks.
Security Lighting
Many park users and residents who reside adjacent
or nearby Anaheim’s parks have conveyed that
our parks are dimly lit, which conveys a feeling
that parks are not safe at night. Although recent
security lighting upgrades have been performed
in some parks, lighting systems in many parks are
outdated and not energy efficient. A park security
lighting survey conducted by the Public Works
Department’s Facility Maintenance Division has
determined the following needs in Anaheim parks.
Location/Park Total $1,000 per
Barton Park 7 $7,000
Boysen Park N/E Restroom & Grounds 49 $49,000
Brookhurst Park Restrooms & Grounds 21 $21,000
Canyon Rim Park Grounds 30 $30,000
Chaparral Park Restroom & Grounds 17 $17,000
Citrus Park Grounds 8 $8,000
Colony Park Grounds 19 $19,000
Edison Park Restroom & Grounds 10 $10,000
Energy Field Park Grounds 12 $12,000
Eucalyptus Park Restroom & Grounds 29 $29,000
Hansen Park Restroom & Grounds 6 $6,000
Imperial Park Grounds 2 $2,000
John Marshall Park Restroom & Grounds 22 $22,000
Juarez Park Restroom & Grounds 6 $6,000
Juliana Park Grounds 5 $5,000
La Palma Park Restroom & Grounds 14 $14,000
Lincoln Park Grounds 5 $5,000
Manzanita Park Recreation Building & Restroom 10 $10,000
Maxwell Park West Restroom & Grounds 1 $1,000
Modjeska Park Restroom & Grounds 23 $23,000
Pearson Park Restroom & Grounds 71 $71,000
Pelanconi Park Grounds 3 $3,000
Peralta Park Restroom & Grounds 46 $46,000
Peter Marshall Park Restroom & Grounds 7 $7,000
Pioneer Park Restroom & Grounds 4 $4,000
Ponderosa Park Recreation Building 9 $9,000
Rio Vista Park Restroom & Grounds 9 $9,000
Riverdale Park Restroom & Grounds 7 $7,000
Ronald Reagan Park Restroom & Grounds 50 $50,000
Roosevelt Park 14 $14,000
Ross Park 19 $19,000
Sage Park Restroom & Grounds 14 $14,000
Stoddard Park Restroom & Grounds 15 $15,000
Sycamore Park Restroom & Grounds 23 $23,000
Twila Reid Park Rec & Restroom Building 4 $4,000
Walnut Grove Park Restroom & Grounds 8 $8,000
Willow Park Restroom & Grounds 5 $5,000
Yorba Park Restroom & Grounds 6 $6,000
Grand Total 610 $610,000
Location/Park Total $500 per
Stoddard Park Restroom & Grounds 2 $1,000
Sycamore Park Restroom & Grounds 2 $1,000
Grand Totals 4 $2,000
Park LED Light Upgrades
Pole Replacement
Anaheim Parks Plan
47
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Park Surveillance Cameras
Parks have historically required a significant police
response based on calls for service and officers
conducting self-initiated activity. In response to
requests from members of the public, the APD
began working with local community partners in
2014 to research innovative programs in other
jurisdictions that helped law enforcement agencies
to better monitor and reduce the crime occurring
in local parks. In 2016 the City Council approved
the Anaheim Police Department Overt Surveillance
Camera Project which targeted the installation
of cameras in three Anaheim parks. In 2017
cameras were installed in Maxwell, Twila Reid, and
Brookhurst parks. Viewing stations were installed
at Anaheim Police dispatch and the Anaheim
Police substation in west Anaheim where specially
trained staff monitor the video feeds. Individuals
monitoring the camera system have the ability to
control cameras remotely to follow events as they
occur, initiate one-way audio communication with
people in controlled areas, and save incidents of
interest for permanent storage. The three parks
were selected based on a review of calls for service
and crime statistics including recent homicides and
community related complaints.
The camera system will assist in creating a safer
environment by reducing crime through the rapid
identification of individuals involved in criminal
behavior. Cameras will deter crime by providing
around-the-clock monitoring capabilities and
the ability to capture video evidence for use in
the prosecution of criminal suspects. At this time
the camera project is being treated as a pilot
project. The three parks will be closely monitored
throughout 2018 and a determination will be made
on the potential expansion of the project to other
parks.
Homelessness
One of the key concerns raised by the community
during the public survey input process was the
homeless presence in the parks. Public complaints
have been expressed about the homeless and
their inappropriate use of the park restrooms,
long-term use of parking spaces by RVs and
other vehicles to the exclusion of use by other
patrons, the appearance of drug use and other
criminal activities and a general feeling of unsafe
conditions. Many indicated that they no longer
visit Anaheim parks because they are afraid to take
their families to the facilities and instead go to
parks in nearby cities.
While these are very real concerns to many
residents, the homeless have every right to be in
the parks, as do all other patrons. They do not
have a right to engage in abhorrent activities nor
do they have the right to vandalize park property.
The Anaheim Municipal Code provides rules and
regulations concerning the use of parks and other
public spaces. These rules are posted on signs
at most parks, especially those where specific
issues are covered by the municipal code. All park
users must abide by these rules or be subject to
enforcement by authorities. It is important to note
that even if a sign does not post an applicable
municipal code, ignorance of the law is not an
excuse. Violators are still subject to enforcement
by authorities.
Increased park supervision by City park
maintenance staff, the City park rangers and the
Anaheim Police Department will assist in making
the parks safer for public use. The Community
Services Department is requesting additional part
time maintenance and park ranger staffing to
provide more supervision and a greater presence
in the parks. The Department should continue to
implement ordinance signage as individual park
conditions warrant it.
Park Rangers
The Anaheim Park Ranger Program provides the
community the opportunity to enjoy a safe and
enjoyable park environment through positive
community relations. The Park Ranger Program
meets this mission by providing the link between
park patrons and the Community Services
Department with service, safety and integrity. Park
Rangers patrol over 68 locations including parks
and community facilities within the city limits.
During weekdays three park rangers and one
supervisor are assigned to patrol during the hours
of 10:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and four park rangers
and one supervisor from 4:00 p.m. to 11:30 p.m.
On weekends, depending upon the season and
activities, five to seven park rangers patrol with one
to two supervisors from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m.
Patrols may change due to seasonal attendance
in parks. Park rangers patrol all of the City’s parks,
in addition to community centers, family resource
centers, gymnasiums, elementary schools and
skate parks. Park rangers conduct perimeter,
interior and foot patrols at these locations ensuring
safety of patrons and inspecting of City property
and equipment, as well as advising patrons of
City policies and ordinances. Other Park Ranger
responsibilities include locking the 41 park
restrooms and 27 trail and access gates on a
nightly basis.
Monthly, park rangers perform an average of
4,300 patrols which include approximately
45,000 contacts with the public, 90 public
assists, interception of 260 alcohol violations and
intervention of over 100 illegal vendors.
Park rangers are not peace officers and do not
have weapons or citing powers. Their job is to
observe park activities and many times, act as
park ambassadors to the public. They will also
request that park patrons refrain from unauthorized
activities. Should the need arise, they are in radio
contact with the Anaheim Police Department and
other emergency services and provide assistance
to them as necessary.
In addition to their normal day to day duties, park
rangers also provide assistance throughout the
year at citywide special events such as the annual
Fall Festival and Halloween Parade, Cinco De
Mayo Fiesta, Concerts in the Parks, fourth of July
celebration, tree lighting events, Grand Opening
ceremonies and during performances at Pearson
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
Pa
r
k
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
Anaheim Parks Plan
48
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Park Maintenance and Safety
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
P
a
r
k
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
Park Amphitheater. Additionally, park rangers are
also assigned to provide support during disaster
events such as fires, floods and earthquakes
in addition to providing 24-hour patrols of the
City’s natural parks during Red Flag Warnings for
potential fires.
In the event that additional resources were
identified for the expansion of the park ranger
program those resources would be used to add
additional patrol areas in the City. This will allow
the program to increase the number of park
rangers on patrol as well as increasing the number
of patrols of parks and community facilities per
patrol shift. Park rangers would have the ability
to spend more time at facilities and provide more
direct contact with community members, providing
an additional layer of feeling safe by patrons in our
parks and facilities.
Private Security Patrols
The City has recently contracted with a private
security company to conduct patrols in selected
parks, the program is a four-month pilot program.
At this time the security company is patrolling five
parks; Twila Reid, Boysen, Maxwell, Schweitzer
and La Palma, but will be directed to other parks
as determined by City staff. The patrols are
conducted each evening beginning at 6 p.m.
and concluding at 2 a.m. The security company
focuses on insuring that park rules are followed
and that patrons leave parks each evening by
10:30 at park closing. The security company
works closely with the police department and the
Code Enforcement Division as needed to address
issues that arise during each patrol. Written
reports are submitted to City staff following
each security officer’s patrol to document what is
witnessed on a nightly basis. This pilot program
will be assessed after the initial four-month term
and a determination will be made on the future
continuation of the patrols, which could include an
expansion of the program.
Code Title # Staff Hours Days Total Hours FTE STEP Rate H-Total Burden B-Total Total
922 Park Ranger Weekday 1 6 260 1,560 0.75 9 $15.89 $24,788.40 40.51%$10,041.78 $34,830.18
922 Park Ranger Weeknight 1 8 260 2,080 1.00 8 $15.13 $31,470.40 40.51%$12,748.66 $44,219.06
922 Park Ranger Weekend Day 1 7 104 728 0.35 9 $15.89 $11,567.92 40.51%$4,686.16 $16,254.08
922 Park Ranger Weekend Night 1 8 104 832 0.40 8 $15.13 $12,588.16 50.51%$6,358.28 $18,946.44
Total 10,400 $173,409.60 $34,880.08 $114,249.76
Section: 4276
Activity: adding one patrol area (1 ranger to each shift)
Work Hours/Dollars
Other Expenses
Supplies (ranger bag) 7,415 $1,000.00
Uniforms 7,416 $300.00
Auto Rent 9,311 $5,353.00
Auto Rent 9,315 $2,041.00
New Vehicle $30,000.00
Total $38,694.00
Total Labor and Operating - $152,943.76
Park Ranger Estimate to Add a Patrol Area Per Day
49
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan - Where We Are Going: Infrastructure Needs
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
N
e
e
d
s
Most park users rate the appearance of parks
based on well-maintained turf, mature trees
and shrub areas. Needed additional funding
for the improvement the basic aesthetic needs
pertaining to the landscaping of Anaheim’s parks
was discussed in Objective 3 of the previous
section. However, park infrastructure is in need
of additional funding as well. The infrastructure
needs are categorized individually in this section.
Drinking Fountains
Park drinking fountains are heavily used and
unfortunately also suffer from occurrences of
frequent vandalism. Many existing park drinking
fountains are worn out and do not function
properly, and suffer from a lack of replacement
parts when repairs are necessary. Facility
maintenance services conducted a survey of
needed drinking fountain replacements which is
shown below.
Irrigation Booster Pumps
Irrigation systems in individual parks depend on
booster pumps that help increase the pressure for
watering which occurs during the nighttime hours.
Without these booster pumps, irrigation systems
do not function to their full capability and water is
not applied evenly. This is particularly important
for large sports turf areas. Inadequate irrigation
application due to malfunctioning booster
pumps results in turf that has pockets of dry areas
combined with areas of complete saturation.
This is particularly amplified during the summer
months where higher temperatures require that
irrigation systems function as designed. Many of
our existing booster pumps are old, unreliable,
and replacement parts are not readily available.
This has resulted in extended periods of time
where parks have gone without operating booster
pumps which has resulted in the loss of turf. The
Facility Maintenance Division has conducted an
inventory of needed park booster pumps and
has determined that approximately $320,000 in
funding is needed for the replacement of selected
pumps.
It is also recommended an additional $15,000
would be needed for temporary back up pumps to
be used to reduce downtime during actual pump
replacements.
Location/Park # of Fountains $5,000 per
Anaheim Coves 2 $10,000
Boysen Park 1 $5,000
Chaparral Park 1 $5,000
Edison Park 2 $10,000
Energy Field Park 1 $5,000
John Marshall Park 1 $5,000
Juliana Park 1 $5,000
La Palma Park 1 $5,000
Little People's Park 1 $5,000
Manzanita Park 1 $5,000
Maxwell Park 1 $5,000
Oak Canyon Nature Park 1 $5,000
Palm Lane Park 1 $5,000
Pearson Park 2 $10,000
Pelanconi Park 1 $5,000
Ponderosa Park 1 $5,000
Reagon Park 2 $10,000
Riverdale Park 1 $5,000
Ross Park 2 $10,000
Schweitzer Park 2 $10,000
Stoddard Park 1 $5,000
Twila Reid Park 2 $10,000
Washington Park 1 $5,000
Founders Park (Wolfe-Stoffell House)2 $10,000
Grand Total 32 $160,000
Drinking Fountain Replacements
Anaheim Parks Plan
50
DRAFT 4,11 2018
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
N
e
e
d
s
- Where We Are Going: Infrastructure Needs
Playgrounds
Many existing park playgrounds are in need of
upgrades to insure that all playground equipment
complies with National Playground Safety
Standards which govern height allowances, fall
zones, and other safety related items to insure that
users are well protected. Many park playgrounds
have been replaced by the KaBOOM! program
through funding donated by the Disneyland
Resort. However, many park playgrounds are still
in need of equipment replacement and upgrades.
The following table ranks the playgrounds in
priority order for needed improvements with
estimates for each park site.
Location/Park Install Year
Edison Park 2011
Stoddard Park 2012
Modjeska Park (5-12 area only)2013
Schweitzer Park 2013
John Marshall Park 2014
Twila Reid Park (two south lots only)2015
Lincoln Park 2016
Imperial Park 2017
Willow Park 2017
Pearson Park 2018
Barton Park 2018
Julianna Park 2019
Location/Park Install Year Cost
Brookhurst Park 1987 $1,000,000
Boysen Park (south lot)1992 $200,000
Canyon Rim Park 1992 $250,000
Citrus Park 1994 $250,000
Riverdale Park
(partial - south area 2 towers + spring toys)
1995 $200,000
Eucalyptus Park 1997 $200,000
Peralta Park 1998 $325,000
George Washington Park 2000 $250,000
Peter Marshall Park 2001 $300,000
Ross Park 2001 $200,000
Cottonwood Park 2001 $200,000
La Palma Park
(equipment has been removed only a swing remains)
$300,000
Yorba Regional Park $300,000
Grand Total $3,975,000
Location/Park Install Year Cost
Twila Reid Park (north lot)2004 $200,000
Maxwell Park 2005 $200,000
Walnut Grove Park 2005 $300,000
Chaparral Park 2006 $200,000
Riverdale Park (north area 5-12 yr. play tower)2007 $200,000
Rio Vista Park 2007 $250,000
Juarez Park (2-5 play tower)2007 $200,000
Modjeska Park (2-5 play tower)2007 $200,000
Little People’s Park 2007 $200,000
Grand Total $1,950,000
Playground in Immediate Need of Replacement
Playgrounds that will Need Replacement in 5-10 Years
KaBOOM! Playgrounds - Recently Repaired
51
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan- Where We Are Going: Infrastructure Needs
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Fencing
Existing chain link fencing, which includes
baseball backstops, was inventoried by Parks
Division management staff. Small repairs due to
vandalism are performed as needed, however
a large portion of park fencing is in need of
replacement due to age. The following tablez
shows the park locations where significant
quantities of chain link fencing is needed for
replacement.
Location/Park Backstops Ball Diamond
Sideline/Dug Out
Fencing
Ballfields
1 Boysen Baseball $ 60,000 $ 15,000 1
2 Boysen Softball $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
3 Boysen T-Ball $ 10,000 $ 8,000 1
4 Brookhurst Baseball $ 60,000 $ 15,000 1
5 Brookhurst Softball/LL #1 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
6 Brookhurst Softball /#2 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
7 Canyon Rim $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
8 Chaparral $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
9 Edison $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
10 Eucalyptus $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
11 John Marshall $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
12 Juarez $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
13 La Palma $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
14 Lincoln $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
15 Maxwell #1 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
16 Maxwell #2 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
17 Modjeska $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
18 Palm Lane $ 15,000 $ 8,000 1
19 Pearson $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
20 Peralta #1 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
21 Peralta #2 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
22 Peralta #3 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
23 Pioneer Softball $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
24 Pioneer Field of Dreams $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
25 Ponderosa $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
26 Rio Vista $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
27 Riverdale $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
28 Ross $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
29 Sage $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
30 Schweitzer $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
31 Stoddard $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
32 Sycamore $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
33 Ronald Reagan #1 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
34 Ronald Reagan #2 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
35 Twila Reid $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
36 Willow $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
37 Yorba #1 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
38 Yorba #2 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
39 Yorba #3 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 1
Grand Total $845,000 $396,000 39
Ballfield Diamond Fencing and Back Stop Repair/Replacement
Costs
Anaheim Parks Plan
52
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Funding Opportunities
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Of course funding for these infrastructure
improvements is always a question. For capital
improvements, the department has relied on
several funding sources. State Park Bond Act and
similar state funding sources have provided monies
for acquisition, development and rehabilitation.
So have Federal Revenue Sharing, Community
Development Block Grants and Land and Water
Conservation Funds. Many of these funding
sources were competitive and many no longer
exist. As a main funding source, developer impact
fees from the Quimby Act enabled Park Dedication
Ordinance are used to develop the new parks and
expand existing improvements to provide better
service to the public. As the City builds out, these
fees will eventually end. The department uses its
general fund allocation to primarily support the
operational and maintenance obligations of the
department. Consequently, there has been little
general fund monies available to support new
park acquisition and development or replacement
of a deteriorating infrastructure. New revenue
streams need to be identified to facilitate a rebirth
to the parks system and provide for long term
maintenance and facility rehabilitation.
The Community Services Department retained
the services of Blais and Associates, a professional
grant management company, to assist the
department in identifying potential funding
sources for the various types of projects in the
Anaheim Parks Plan. Below is the summarized
information, with the complete report attached
as appendix C. Several other potential funding
sources not included with the Blais report are also
discussed.
Additionally if approved by the voters in June
2018, funding is potentially available from the SB
5 Bond Measure entitled, The California Drought,
Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and
Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018. SB 5 would
provide both competitive and non-competitive
project funding opportunities. Specific criteria for
this grant program has not been completed at the
writing of this document. If approved by the voters
in June 2018, this could provide an important
funding source for Anaheim Parks in the near
future.
Summarized, funding opportunities are as follows:
1. The city of Anaheim Park In-Lieu Fees-
These are fees assessed developers with
the construction of residential dwelling
units in the City. Required by Anaheim’s
Park Dedication Ordinance, developers
must pay fees for each residential unit,
based upon the type of unit, or under
certain conditions provide developed
parks to serve the future residents of
their development. At buildout, which
is estimated to be 2040, it is anticipated
an additional 21,511 residential units
will be built in Anaheim. In March 2017,
a Development Impact Fee Justification
Study was prepared by David Taussig and
Associates and presented to City Council
to address increases in City development
impact fees. That study recommended
that existing park in-lieu fees be revised
from the current rates based upon several
residential unit types to a single overall
fee per unit. That fee was proposed to be
$21,790 per unit, regardless of residential
type. That fee, if approved by City Council
will provide approximately $469 million
to be used for future park acquisition
and development.
Typically, park in-lieu fees are due when
a subdivision tract is recorded or
building permits are issued for residential
development. Fees collected at that
time can be accumulated and expended
towards the acquisition and development
of parks or recreation facilities which could
be available for public use at or soon after
resident move-in.
The City Council has approved an optional
fee deferral program that enables a
developer to defer fee payment until
project completion or Certificates of
Occupancy are issued. If a developer takes
advantage of the deferral, it could delay
the park development for an indeterminate
time period. This fee deferral program
should be reevaluated to determine if it is
still warranted.
2. Baseball Tomorrow Fund- provides funding
for incremental programming and facilities
for youth baseball and softball programs.
Generally, funds are awarded for capital
expenditures, with an average project
award of $40,000. A 50 percent match is
required per project.
3. Safe Places To Play- For soccer project
development in underserved communities.
Provides funding for artificial turf, lighting,
irrigation and sports court development.
There is a 50 percent matching fund
requirement with specific criteria for
various aspects of development.
4. KaBOOM! grants- For children’s play area
development. There are several grants
available under the KaBOOM! program
including working with KaBOOM! and
corporate partners; a build it yourself
program with funds to be used for
purchase of playground equipment; and
creative play grants where KaBOOM! and
funding partners plan and develop play
areas within specific geographical and
organizational parameters during specific
times of the calendar year. The city of
Anaheim has used this funding source in
the past. Funding for each project varies as
does the matching requirement.
Anaheim Parks Plan
53
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
5. SB1 Local partnership Program- A
competitive state grant program that
funds the construction of improvements
to the state highway or local road system
that funds many types of transportation
oriented projects, including improvements
to bicycle or pedestrian safety or mobility
with an extended useful life. The city of
Anaheim is within Category lll (population
300,000 to 699,999) which has a maximum
funding requirement of $2 million.
6. Land and Water Conservation Fund- A
Federal program administered by the
state. The purpose of the program is to
acquire and develop outdoor recreation
projects meeting one of more of the
priorities listed in the State of California
Outdoor recreation Plan (SCORP).There is
a maximum funding amount of $3 million
and a 50 percent matching requirement.
7. Active Transportation Program- A State
program providing competitive funding
for, among other things, new and/or
improvements to bikeways and walkways
for non-motorized users, recreational trails
and trailheads facilitating trail linkages or
connectivity to non-motorized corridors
and conversion of abandoned railroad
corridors to trails and other bicycle,
walking oriented programs. Maximum
funding is $240 million with no match
required.
8. Highway Safety Improvement Grant- This
is a competitive state program providing
funding for pedestrian oriented safety and
bike lane development projects. Project
funding levels range from $100,000
minimum to $10 million maximum. There is
a match requirement of 10 percent.
9. Environmental Enhancement and
Mitigation Grant Program- This is a state
competitive grant program providing
funding to mitigate environmental
impacts caused by new or modified state
transportation facilities. Types of projects
funded under this program include trail
projects, acquisition or enhancement
of resource lands to mitigate the loss of
resource lands within or near transportation
improvements, roadside recreational
amenities and others. Projects are funded
from several categories: urban forestry,
resource lands and mitigation projects
beyond the scope of the lead agency.
Project awards are generally limited to
$500,000. Acquisition projects may be
awarded up to $1million. There is no match
requirement.
10. Habitat Conservation Funds- A state
competitive grant program that provides
funding to protect natural resources,
acquire and develop wildlife corridors and
trails and develop nature interpretation
programs that bring urban residents into
park and wildlife areas. Projects include
acquisition or development of trails,
wetlands habitat and nature interpretation
activities. There is no minimum or
maximum funding limit, but the state
recommends the grant request not exceed
$200,000 per project. There is a dollar for
dollar matching requirement.
11. Recreational Trails Program- This is a state
competitive grant program funding both
non-motorized and motorized recreational
trails and trail related facilities. Projects
include the acquisition and development
or improvement of easements and
fee simple title for trails, trailsides
and trailheads for non-motorized and
motorized projects. There is a $50,000
minimum to a maximum of $1.5 million for
project applications. There is a 12 percent
matching requirement.
12. The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB)-
This is a state organization that provides
funding for a multitude of project
categories. Projects include the acquisition
and development of lands and water for
recreation purposes and the preservation
of wildlife habitat. Because of the varied
types of grants available from this funding
source, projects should be discussed
directly with WCB representatives before
beginning the application process.
13. Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program- CDBG funds are
federal funds allocated to jurisdictions to
improve low to moderate income areas.
The jurisdiction is allocated an amount
based upon its low to moderate income
population. Funding can be used for a
variety of projects including acquisition and
development or improvement of parks and
recreational facilities.
14. Community Services Department
Neighborhood Improvement Fund- This
is a general fund allocation available to
fund small projects within the Anaheim
neighborhoods. Projects such as individual
security lights and similar small items can
be funded through this program.
15. Anaheim General Fund- In the past,
largely because of other priorities, the
grantsmanship of the staff and the park
in-lieu fee collection, the Anaheim general
fund has not been extensively used for
park acquisition or development. Typically,
the yearly general fund allocation received
by the Community Services Department
offsets much of the programming,
operation and maintenance activities
Anaheim Parks Plan
54
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Funding Opportunities
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
and personnel required to provide the
community with park, recreation, library
services.
16. General Obligation and Revenue Bonds-
The key difference between these two
potential funding sources are that general
obligation bonds are issued for projects
where the bond is backed by the credit
and taxing power of the issuing jurisdiction
rather than revenue from a specific project.
No assets are used as collateral. This type
of bond requires a two-thirds approval
vote by the electorate to approve the
bond. Funds are to be used for capital
development and cannot be used for
operation and maintenance or non-fixed
equipment purchases.
Revenue Bonds are those bonds backed
by the revenue generated by the specific
project financed by the bond. As such
once the project is completed and in
operation, revenue generated by the
project retire the bond debt. Because this
bond does not result in tax generation, it
does not require a vote of the public.
17. Sale of vacant or undeveloped City
open space- Currently the City has
approximately 48 acres of vacant or
undeveloped open space. While these
properties are included in the overall open
space expansion plan for the City, it may
make sense to consider the sale of some of
these properties with the proceeds going
to either purchase new parks in more park
deficient areas or develop new facilities
to accommodate need. This should be
evaluated on a case-by case-basis.
18. Anaheim Community Foundation- The
foundation was created to develop
effective partnerships with numerous
agencies that serve those who cannot
easily help themselves. A nonprofit 501(c)3
organization, its mission is to receive,
invest and distribute funds, property and
other resources to promote the provision
of public parks, recreation and community
services in the city of Anaheim. This
organization can work with the City to
fundraise for specific projects outside the
normal city budget process. Designated
donations given to the Foundation can
provide grants or seed monies to facilitate
development of programs and special
projects to benefit the community. The
Foundation is capable of fundraising for
large scale projects through the donation
process.
Anaheim Parks Plan
55
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Wh
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Anaheim Parks Plan
56
DRAFT 4,11 2018
- Where We Are Going: Overall Recommendations
W
h
e
r
e
W
e
A
r
e
G
o
i
n
g
:
O
v
e
r
a
l
l
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
Throughout this plan there are recommendations
made to alleviate the identified issues. It is
important to note that implementation of these
recommendations will take time, resources and
staffing to complete. The Anaheim Parks Plan
is a review of park related concerns and does
not reflect on other concerns within the city of
Anaheim. To keep pace with projected population
increase it is essential the park system grow
appropriately.
Because the City is nearing buildout, resources
are scarce and available privately owned parcels
are few or designated for other uses, a reliance on
the sports facilities provided by the school districts
within Anaheim city limits would be a necessity
if needs were to be met. In order to meet the
recreational needs of the community, the following
recommendations are presented;
1. Execute additional joint use agreements
with the seven school districts within the
City to implement facility scheduling to
reduce user conflicts.
Education administrative authorities within
city limits that serve our residents:
• Orange County Department of Education
• Anaheim Elementary School District
• Anaheim Union High School District
• Centralia Elementary School District
• Magnolia School District
• Orange Unified School District
• Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School
District
• Savanna Elementary School District
• North Orange County ROP
• Buena Park School District
• Garden Grove Unified School District
2. Build sports complexes to meet the
increased athletic field needs of the
community
3. Execute lease and/or use agreements with
the various quasi–public and public entities
for the improvement of their vacant or
under utilized properties for recreational
uses.
4. Pursue existing and new funding
opportunities, including an increase in the
Park In-Lieu Development Impact Fee.
Explore rescinding the park fee deferral
program for non affordable housig projects
5. Acquire and develop privately owned land
for park purposes.
6. Redesign or redevelop existing parks to
improve use of facilities.
• Encourage new tree and landscape
plantings to beautify parks. Use drought
tolerant, low maintenance but interesting
and colorful plant species.
• Follow the department’s Americans with
Disabilities Act Transition Plan to ensure
access for all users in City parks.
7. Implement the recommendations included
under the Park Maintenance and Safety
Section which:
• Provide for increased park maintenance
and park ranger staffing.
• Continue pilot program for the use of
park surveillance cameras in three City
parks.
• Address park infrastructure needs such
as restrooms, security lighting, drinking
fountains, irrigation booster pumps,
playgrounds and chain link fencing
issues.
• Establish or reestablish new crew
maintenance yards to facilitate increased
park maintenance staff levels.
8. Determine the criteria necessary to include
restrooms in parks. This would establish
which park types have restrooms and those
that do not.
9. Facilitate, through scheduled
programming, community use of the
existing swimming pools at the high
schools in Anaheim. Additionally, build an
aquatic center complex to accomodate
year round use, programming and other
activities.
10. Update the Anaheim City General Plan.
• Update the green element of the general
plan to incorporate the new categories
of park facilities.
• Protect and retain existing parkland by
amending the General Plan designation
of existing parkland that is currently
designated for uses other than parks and
open space.
11. Complete a new Strategic Plan for the
Anaheim Community Services Department
and commit to updates every 10 years.
57
DRAFT 4,11 2018
Anaheim Parks Plan
Cl
o
s
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
The Anaheim Parks Plan is a document that will
serve as a guide to assist the Community Services
Department with direction for the continued
acquisition, development and rehabilitation of new
parks and facilities until the year 2025.
It will also provide staff direction to give a higher
priority to maintenance to ensure that Anaheim’s
park system remains vibrant and receives the
necessary funding and attention of decision makers
who allocate funding.
An extensive outreach and review process
was used to assist in the development of
recommendations for proceeding in the future. It
is anticipated the Plan will provide the direction
needed to fulfill those recommendations.
- Closing Statement
Anaheim Parks Plan: Appendix A
Anaheim Community Services
April 11, 2018
DR
A
F
T
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
/
F
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
B
a
s
e
b
a
l
l
S
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
B
a
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
V
o
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
P
i
c
k
l
e
B
a
l
l
T
e
n
n
i
s
S
k
a
t
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
c
g
o
l
f
H
o
r
s
e
s
h
o
e
S
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
P
o
o
l
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
'
s
P
l
a
y
A
r
e
a
B
o
c
c
e
B
a
l
l
F
i
t
n
e
s
s
Z
o
n
e
s
S
p
l
a
s
h
P
a
d
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
T
a
b
l
e
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
M
u
l
t
i
U
s
e
T
r
a
i
l
H
e
a
d
B
B
Q
F
i
r
e
R
i
n
g
D
o
g
P
a
r
k
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
C
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
A
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
S
t
a
d
i
u
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
Teen Center Historic Facility Recreation Room Family Resource Center Youth Center Accessibility Center Interpretive amenity/signage GymnasiumsLibrary On-site Parking
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
2
(
1
L
)
*
1
L
2
L
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
De
l
p
h
i
2
L
11
Ha
n
s
e
n
1
M
a
x
w
e
l
l
2
L
*
3
(
2
L
)
1
1
21
1
Pe
t
e
r
M
a
r
s
h
a
l
l
1
Sc
h
w
e
i
t
z
e
r
1
*
1
1
1
1
11
Tw
i
l
a
R
e
i
d
2
L
*
1
L
3
1
4
1
1
21
We
s
t
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
Y
o
u
t
h
C
e
n
t
e
r
1111
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
T
o
t
a
l
7
1
7
2
0
3
0
2
1
4
0
6
0
1
0
1
00
1
1
4
0
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
8
5
L
1
1
Da
l
e
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
1
8
4
6
L
1
1
Fl
o
o
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
1
Ma
x
w
e
l
l
11
1
Or
a
n
g
e
v
i
e
w
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
6
6
L
1
1
SC
E
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
r
o
m
s
o
u
t
h
c
i
t
y
l
i
m
i
t
t
o
n
o
r
t
h
c
i
t
y
l
i
m
i
t
Sc
h
w
e
i
t
z
e
r
L
Se
q
u
o
i
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
O
W
11
Tw
i
l
a
R
e
i
d
11
1
We
s
t
e
r
n
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
L
3
L
4
6
L
1
1
2
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
3
5
1
2
6
4
0
2
3
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
2
0
01
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
5
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
1
0
6
8
2
8
4
3
2
3
2
1
4
1
8
0
3
2
1
01
1
5
4
0
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
1
0
0
6
1
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
1
Building Uses
Sp
o
r
t
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
L=
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
*=
s
o
c
c
e
r
/
f
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
u
s
e
f
i
e
l
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
DR
A
F
T
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
/
F
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
B
a
s
e
b
a
l
l
S
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
B
a
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
V
o
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
P
i
c
k
l
e
B
a
l
l
T
e
n
n
i
s
S
k
a
t
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
c
g
o
l
f
H
o
r
s
e
s
h
o
e
S
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
P
o
o
l
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
'
s
P
l
a
y
A
r
e
a
B
o
c
c
e
B
a
l
l
F
i
t
n
e
s
s
Z
o
n
e
s
S
p
l
a
s
h
P
a
d
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
T
a
b
l
e
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
M
u
l
t
i
U
s
e
T
r
a
i
l
H
e
a
d
B
B
Q
F
i
r
e
R
i
n
g
D
o
g
P
a
r
k
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
C
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
A
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
S
t
a
d
i
u
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
Teen Center Historic Facility Recreation Room Family Resource Center Youth Center Accessibility Center Interpretive amenity/signage GymnasiumsLibrary On-site ParkingBuilding Uses
Sp
o
r
t
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Ba
r
t
o
n
1*
1
Ch
a
p
a
r
r
a
l
1*
1
2
1
11
1
Ci
r
c
l
e
1
Jo
h
n
M
a
r
s
h
a
l
l
2*
2
(
1
L
)
1
1
1
11
Mo
d
j
e
s
k
a
2
(
1
L
)
*
1
L
1
L
1
1
1
11
1
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
T
o
t
a
l
6
0
5
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
2
10
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ba
r
t
o
n
11
1
1
Ch
a
p
a
r
r
a
l
1
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
/
P
o
l
a
r
i
s
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
2
L
1
L
4
1
Jo
h
n
M
a
r
s
h
a
l
l
L
Lo
a
r
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
L
2
L
4
4
8
L
1
1
1
M
a
g
n
o
l
i
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
2
L
2
L
2
L
4
8
L
1
1
1
Mo
d
j
e
s
k
a
L1
1
1
1
OC
F
C
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
C
r
e
s
c
e
n
t
B
a
s
i
n
1
OC
F
C
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
e
a
s
t
o
f
T
i
g
e
r
W
o
o
d
s
OC
F
C
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
D
a
d
M
i
l
l
e
r
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
Sa
v
a
n
n
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
L
2
L
2
L
9
8
L
1
1
1
SC
E
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
f
r
o
m
B
r
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
t
o
E
u
c
l
i
d
1
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
6
4
7
2
2
0
4
2
4
0
0
0
3
2
0
3
1
0
00
6
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
1
2
4
1
2
2
6
1
4
2
4
0
0
0
3
6
0
3
1
2
10
9
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
3
0
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
2
L=
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
*=
s
o
c
c
e
r
/
f
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
u
s
e
f
i
e
l
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
DR
A
F
T
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
/
F
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
B
a
s
e
b
a
l
l
S
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
B
a
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
V
o
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
P
i
c
k
l
e
B
a
l
l
T
e
n
n
i
s
S
k
a
t
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
c
g
o
l
f
H
o
r
s
e
s
h
o
e
S
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
P
o
o
l
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
'
s
P
l
a
y
A
r
e
a
B
o
c
c
e
B
a
l
l
F
i
t
n
e
s
s
Z
o
n
e
s
S
p
l
a
s
h
P
a
d
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
T
a
b
l
e
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
M
u
l
t
i
U
s
e
T
r
a
i
l
H
e
a
d
B
B
Q
F
i
r
e
R
i
n
g
D
o
g
P
a
r
k
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
C
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
A
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
S
t
a
d
i
u
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
Teen Center Historic Facility Recreation Room Family Resource Center Youth Center Accessibility Center Interpretive amenity/signage GymnasiumsLibrary On-site ParkingBuilding Uses
Sp
o
r
t
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
An
a
h
e
i
m
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
Ci
t
r
u
s
11
1
1
1
Co
l
o
n
y
1
1
Co
l
o
n
y
S
q
u
a
r
e
Fo
u
n
d
e
r
s
'
P
a
r
k
11
1
1
Fr
i
e
n
d
s
h
i
p
P
l
a
z
a
Ge
o
r
g
e
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
2
1
Ju
l
i
a
n
n
a
11
1
La
P
a
l
m
a
1L
*
1
L
1
1
14
2
2
1
1
Li
t
t
l
e
P
e
o
p
l
e
'
s
11
1
M
a
n
z
a
n
i
t
a
1*
1
1
2
1
111
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
1L
*
1
L
2
6
L
1
1
2
21
1
1
1
Ro
s
s
1L
*
1
L
2
1
1
1
Sa
g
e
1*
1
1
1
1
11
Wi
l
l
o
w
1*
1
1
1
1
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
T
o
t
a
l
6
2
4
8
4
0
6
1
0
0
1
1
3
0
1
0
11
01
1
3
4
1
3
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
0
1
0
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ce
n
t
e
r
C
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
An
a
h
e
i
m
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
L
1
L
2
L
7
L
1
1
1
La
P
a
l
m
a
3L
2
L
1
1
1
1
1
1
M
a
n
z
a
n
i
t
a
1
Pa
u
l
i
n
e
a
n
d
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
1
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
2
OC
F
C
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
R
a
y
m
o
n
d
B
a
s
i
n
1
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
4
1
4
0
0
2
7
1
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
00
2
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
1
0
3
8
8
4
2
1
3
2
0
0
2
1
3
0
4
0
11
01
1
5
5
1
3
3
1
2
2
2
3
1
1
0
2
0
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
3
L=
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
*=
s
o
c
c
e
r
/
f
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
u
s
e
f
i
e
l
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
DR
A
F
T
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
/
F
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
B
a
s
e
b
a
l
l
S
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
B
a
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
V
o
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
P
i
c
k
l
e
B
a
l
l
T
e
n
n
i
s
S
k
a
t
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
c
g
o
l
f
H
o
r
s
e
s
h
o
e
S
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
P
o
o
l
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
'
s
P
l
a
y
A
r
e
a
B
o
c
c
e
B
a
l
l
F
i
t
n
e
s
s
Z
o
n
e
s
S
p
l
a
s
h
P
a
d
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
T
a
b
l
e
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
M
u
l
t
i
U
s
e
T
r
a
i
l
H
e
a
d
B
B
Q
F
i
r
e
R
i
n
g
D
o
g
P
a
r
k
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
C
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
A
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
S
t
a
d
i
u
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
Teen Center Historic Facility Recreation Room Family Resource Center Youth Center Accessibility Center Interpretive amenity/signage GymnasiumsLibrary On-site ParkingBuilding Uses
Sp
o
r
t
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Bo
y
s
e
n
2(
1
)
L
*
3
L
2
L
2
1
4
L
2
31
Co
t
t
o
n
w
o
o
d
1
En
e
r
g
y
F
i
e
l
d
1
2
1
Pa
l
m
L
a
n
e
1*
1
1
1
Pa
u
l
R
e
v
e
r
e
11
1
Po
n
d
e
r
o
s
a
1L
*
1
L
1
1
1
1
21
1
1
1
1
1
St
o
d
d
a
r
d
1*
1
1
11
Wa
l
n
u
t
G
r
o
v
e
11
1
1
1
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
T
o
t
a
l
5
3
5
1
4
1
4
2
0
0
0
9
0
2
1
3
00
8
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Av
o
n
D
a
k
o
t
a
1
11
En
e
r
g
y
F
i
e
l
d
Pa
l
m
L
a
n
e
1
1
Po
c
k
e
t
p
a
r
k
s
n
e
a
r
P
a
u
l
R
e
v
e
r
e
1
SC
E
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
1
St
o
d
d
a
r
d
LL
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
5
3
5
1
4
0
1
4
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
1
3
00
9
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
2
2
0
0
1
1
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
4
L=
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
*=
s
o
c
c
e
r
/
f
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
u
s
e
f
i
e
l
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
DR
A
F
T
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
/
F
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
B
a
s
e
b
a
l
l
S
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
B
a
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
V
o
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
P
i
c
k
l
e
B
a
l
l
T
e
n
n
i
s
S
k
a
t
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
c
g
o
l
f
H
o
r
s
e
s
h
o
e
S
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
P
o
o
l
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
'
s
P
l
a
y
A
r
e
a
B
o
c
c
e
B
a
l
l
F
i
t
n
e
s
s
Z
o
n
e
s
S
p
l
a
s
h
P
a
d
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
T
a
b
l
e
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
M
u
l
t
i
U
s
e
T
r
a
i
l
H
e
a
d
B
B
Q
F
i
r
e
R
i
n
g
D
o
g
P
a
r
k
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
C
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
A
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
S
t
a
d
i
u
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
Teen Center Historic Facility Recreation Room Family Resource Center Youth Center Accessibility Center Interpretive amenity/signage GymnasiumsLibrary On-site ParkingBuilding Uses
Sp
o
r
t
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
An
a
h
e
i
m
C
o
v
e
s
11
2
Co
r
a
l
T
r
e
e
1
1
Ed
i
s
o
n
1*
1
2
1
1
1
Ju
a
r
e
z
1*
1
1
21
1
1
Li
n
c
o
l
n
1*
1
1
1
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
1
Mi
r
a
l
o
m
a
11
1
1
1111
Pi
o
n
e
e
r
1*
1
2
1
1
2
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
1*
3
2
11
1
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
T
o
t
a
l
5
0
7
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
4
1
2
00
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Al
o
e
G
r
e
e
n
s
1
2
Al
o
e
P
r
o
m
a
d
e
Ba
l
l
R
o
a
d
B
a
s
i
n
4L
1
11
Ja
c
a
r
a
n
d
a
1
Ka
t
e
l
l
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
L
2
L
1
L
4
2
8
L
1
1
1
Li
n
c
o
l
n
111
OC
W
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
B
a
s
i
n
OC
W
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
M
i
l
l
e
r
B
a
s
i
n
1
Pi
o
n
e
e
r
1L
11
OC
W
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
P
l
a
c
e
n
t
i
a
B
a
s
i
n
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
L
SC
E
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
a
n
d
C
e
r
r
i
t
o
s
SC
E
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
f
r
o
m
L
e
w
i
s
t
o
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
So
u
t
h
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
1
6
L
1
1
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
1
8
6
L
1
1
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
8
2
3
1
2
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
3
0
0
1
6
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
1
3
2
1
0
1
2
4
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
1
3
0
4
2
5
0
0
1
1
6
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
2
2
0
0
3
1
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
5
L=
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
*=
s
o
c
c
e
r
/
f
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
u
s
e
f
i
e
l
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
DR
A
F
T
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
/
F
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
B
a
s
e
b
a
l
l
S
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
B
a
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
V
o
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
P
i
c
k
l
e
B
a
l
l
T
e
n
n
i
s
S
k
a
t
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
c
g
o
l
f
H
o
r
s
e
s
h
o
e
S
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
P
o
o
l
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
'
s
P
l
a
y
A
r
e
a
B
o
c
c
e
B
a
l
l
F
i
t
n
e
s
s
Z
o
n
e
s
S
p
l
a
s
h
P
a
d
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
T
a
b
l
e
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
M
u
l
t
i
U
s
e
T
r
a
i
l
H
e
a
d
B
B
Q
F
i
r
e
R
i
n
g
D
o
g
P
a
r
k
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
C
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
A
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
S
t
a
d
i
u
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
Teen Center Historic Facility Recreation Room Family Resource Center Youth Center Accessibility Center Interpretive amenity/signage GymnasiumsLibrary On-site ParkingBuilding Uses
Sp
o
r
t
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
An
a
h
e
i
m
H
i
l
l
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
2
L
11
An
a
h
e
i
m
We
t
l
a
n
d
s
Ca
n
y
o
n
R
i
m
1*
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
De
e
r
C
a
n
y
o
n
1
Ea
s
t
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
21
1
1
Eu
c
a
l
y
p
t
u
s
1*
1
1
1
1
1
1
Im
p
e
r
i
a
l
1
1
Oa
k
C
a
n
y
o
n
N
a
t
u
r
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
2
11
Oa
k
P
a
r
k
Ol
i
v
e
H
i
l
l
s
6
1
1
Pe
l
a
n
c
o
n
i
Pe
r
a
l
t
a
C
a
n
y
o
n
/
C
r
e
s
c
e
n
t
E
l
em
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
2
L
*
3
L
1
1
1
2
2
11
1
Ri
v
e
r
d
a
l
e
1*
1
1
1
1
1
Ro
n
a
l
d
R
e
a
g
a
n
2L
*
2
L
1
1
1
2
1
1
Ro
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
1*
1
1
1
L
1
2
1
1
Wa
l
n
u
t
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Yo
r
b
a
3L
*
3
L
1
11
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
T
o
t
a
l
1
1
0
1
4
6
4
0
6
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
10
01
1
5
3
1
0
2
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
1
1
1
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ca
n
y
o
n
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1L
2
L
1
L
6
6
L
1
1
1
Ea
s
t
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
-
L
o
g
a
n
W
e
l
l
s
S
k
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
1
El
R
a
n
c
h
o
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1L
1
Es
p
e
r
a
n
z
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1L
2
L
1
L
6
8
L
1
1
1
Fa
i
r
m
o
n
t
a
n
d
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
i
m
S
i
t
e
Fa
i
r
m
o
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
/
O
S
a
n
t
a
A
n
a
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
Go
l
f
c
o
u
r
s
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
n
e
x
t
t
o
f
i
r
e
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
9
Im
p
e
r
i
a
l
1
1
No
h
l
R
a
n
c
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
e
a
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
1
1
Ol
i
v
e
H
i
l
l
s
2
Pe
r
a
l
t
a
/
C
r
e
s
c
e
n
t
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
2L
1
SC
E
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
S
a
n
t
a
A
n
a
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
Se
r
r
a
n
o
a
n
d
N
o
h
l
R
a
n
c
h
11
1
1
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
L
1
Wa
l
n
u
t
C
a
n
y
o
n
S
i
t
e
Yo
r
b
a
U
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
S
i
t
e
2L
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
5
4
4
1
2
1
2
1
4
2
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
2
00
4
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
1
6
4
1
8
1
8
5
2
2
0
2
0
0
1
9
0
2
0
12
01
1
9
3
1
1
2
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
1
3
2
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
6
L=
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
*=
s
o
c
c
e
r
/
f
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
u
s
e
f
i
e
l
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
DR
A
F
T
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
/
F
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
B
a
s
e
b
a
l
l
S
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
B
a
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
V
o
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
P
i
c
k
l
e
B
a
l
l
T
e
n
n
i
s
S
k
a
t
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
D
i
s
c
g
o
l
f
H
o
r
s
e
s
h
o
e
S
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
P
o
o
l
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
'
s
P
l
a
y
A
r
e
a
B
o
c
c
e
B
a
l
l
F
i
t
n
e
s
s
Z
o
n
e
s
S
p
l
a
s
h
P
a
d
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
T
a
b
l
e
s
P
i
c
n
i
c
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
M
u
l
t
i
U
s
e
T
r
a
i
l
H
e
a
d
B
B
Q
F
i
r
e
R
i
n
g
D
o
g
P
a
r
k
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
C
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
A
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
S
t
a
d
i
u
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
Teen Center Historic Facility Recreation Room Family Resource Center Youth Center Accessibility Center Interpretive amenity/signage GymnasiumsLibrary On-site ParkingBuilding Uses
Sp
o
r
t
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
4
0
6
4
2
2
1
1
5
3
2
6
6
1
4
1
5
1
0
8
2
29
12
6
0
1
5
2
3
6
2
5
2
1
4
4
4
1
1
4
4
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
2
6
1
6
1
9
7
2
7
8
8
8
3
0
0
7
8
0
1
3
4
5
02
2
3
1
0
1
3
1
1
0
0
6
2
0
0
1
4
1
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
T
o
t
a
l
6
6
2
2
6
1
9
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
4
9
1
4
8
5
9
0
2
1
6
34
14
8
3
1
6
2
4
9
3
6
2
1
4
1
0
6
1
1
1
8
5
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
p
e
r
T
P
L
a
n
d
L
A
C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
r
k
N
e
e
d
s
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
59
8
4
6
4
6
0
1
1
8
7
7
5
4
8
9
**
S
o
f
t
b
a
l
l
a
n
d
b
a
s
e
b
a
l
l
t
a
b
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
**
*
T
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
h
a
v
i
n
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
d
a
t
a
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
e
n
i
o
r
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
s
i
m
i
l
ar
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
59
*
*
13***
L=
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
*=
s
o
c
c
e
r
/
f
o
o
t
b
a
l
l
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
u
s
e
f
i
e
l
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
Anaheim Parks Plan: Appendix B
Anaheim Community Services
April 11, 2018
DR
A
F
T
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ac
r
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
an
d
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ac
r
e
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
a
r
k
Ca
t
e
g
o
r
y
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
O
w
n
e
r
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
2
6
.
6
2
6
.
6
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Re
n
o
v
a
t
e
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
n
o
r
t
h
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
a
n
d
c
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
s
t
a
n
d
,
a
d
d
sm
a
l
l
b
a
c
k
s
t
o
p
s
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
a
r
e
a
,
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
,
ex
p
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
e
x
p
a
n
d
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
k
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
w
i
t
h
a
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
th
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
s
a
d
l
a
n
d
s
s
k
a
t
e
a
r
e
a
.
City of Anaheim
De
l
p
h
i
3
.
9
3
.
9
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
a
n
d
c
o
n
c
e
s
s
i
o
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
.
City of Anaheim
Ha
n
s
e
n
3
.
5
3
.
5
M
i
n
i
Savanna School District
Ma
x
w
e
l
l
2
4
.
5
2
4
.
5
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
D
o
g
P
a
r
k
,
a
d
d
a
f
i
t
n
e
s
s
z
o
n
e
a
n
d
s
p
l
a
s
h
p
a
d
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
,
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
f
i
e
l
d
l
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
d
d
F
a
m
i
l
y
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
re
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
m
o
v
e
t
h
e
S
p
e
n
c
e
r
H
o
u
s
e
.
SCE, Magnolia School District
Pe
t
e
r
M
a
r
s
h
a
l
l
4
.
8
3
.
0
M
i
n
i
R
e
m
o
v
e
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Magnolia School District
Sc
h
w
e
i
t
z
e
r
8
.
5
8
.
5
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
L
i
g
h
t
F
i
e
l
d
.
Magnolia School District
Tw
i
l
a
R
e
i
d
2
3
.
9
2
3
.
9
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
A
d
d
a
f
i
t
n
e
s
s
z
o
n
e
,
s
p
l
a
s
h
p
a
d
a
n
d
F
a
m
i
l
y
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
Savanna School District
We
s
t
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
Y
o
u
t
h
C
e
n
t
e
r
2
.
9
2
.
9
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ad
d
F
a
m
i
l
y
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
City of Anaheim
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
7.
5
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
Da
l
e
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
14
.
5
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
Fl
o
o
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
0
.
3
P
o
c
k
e
t
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Orange County Flood Control District
Or
a
n
g
e
v
i
e
w
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
8.
0
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
SC
E
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
r
o
m
s
o
u
t
h
c
i
t
y
l
i
m
i
t
t
o
n
o
r
t
h
ci
t
y
l
i
m
i
t
38
.
3
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Southern California Edison
Se
q
u
o
i
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
O
W
2
.
4
M
i
n
i
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
City of Anaheim
We
s
t
e
r
n
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
22
.
0
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
To
t
a
l
98
.
6
1
8
9
.
8
To
t
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
1
0
)
5
6
,
4
6
8
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
1
.
7
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
2
5
)
60
,
1
8
5
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
(
2
0
2
5
)
3
.
2
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
1
DR
A
F
T
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ac
r
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
an
d
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ac
r
e
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
a
r
k
Ca
t
e
g
o
r
y
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
O
w
n
e
r
Ba
r
t
o
n
4
.
6
4
.
6
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
F
u
l
l
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
8
.
City of Anaheim
Ch
a
p
a
r
r
a
l
9
.
7
9
.
7
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
u
i
l
d
a
s
p
l
a
s
h
p
a
d
a
t
t
h
e
f
o
r
m
e
r
w
a
d
i
n
g
p
o
o
l
.
City of Anaheim
Ci
r
c
l
e
0
.
2
0
.
2
P
o
c
k
e
t
City of Anaheim
Jo
h
n
M
a
r
s
h
a
l
l
13
.
9
1
3
.
9
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Re
p
l
a
c
e
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
a
n
d
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
r
o
o
m
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
p
i
c
n
i
c
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
f
i
e
l
d
li
g
h
t
s
.
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
City of Anaheim
Mo
d
j
e
s
k
a
21
.
8
2
1
.
8
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Re
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
,
o
p
e
n
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
y
a
r
d
,
a
d
d
f
i
t
n
e
s
s
zo
n
e
,
a
d
d
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
,
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
.
City of Anaheim
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
OC
F
C
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
e
a
s
t
o
f
T
i
g
e
r
W
o
o
d
s
0.
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Orange County Flood Control District
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
/
P
o
l
a
r
i
s
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
6.
2
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
Lo
a
r
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
22
.
3
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
22
.
0
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
OC
F
C
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
D
a
d
M
i
l
l
e
r
G
o
l
f
Co
u
r
s
e
0.
5
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Orange County Flood Control District
OC
F
C
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
C
r
e
s
c
e
n
t
B
a
s
i
n
10
.
3
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Orange County Flood Control District
Sa
v
a
n
n
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
SC
E
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
f
r
o
m
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
t
o
E
u
c
l
i
d
20
.
0
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Southern California Edison
To
t
a
l
50
.
2
1
3
2
.
2
To
t
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
1
0
)
5
5
,
6
8
2
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
0
.
9
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
2
5
)
59
,
4
2
8
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
(
2
0
2
5
)
2
.
2
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
2
DR
A
F
T
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ac
r
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
an
d
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ac
r
e
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
a
r
k
Ca
t
e
g
o
r
y
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
O
w
n
e
r
An
a
h
e
i
m
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
an
d
G
y
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
2.
7
6
.
7
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ne
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
a
n
d
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
s
k
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
.
City of Anaheim
Ci
t
r
u
s
1
.
8
1
.
8
M
i
n
i
A
d
d
a
f
i
t
n
e
s
z
o
n
e
,
m
o
r
e
p
i
c
n
i
c
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
o
r
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
Cit y of Anaheim
Co
l
o
n
y
0
.
9
0
.
9
P
o
c
k
e
t
Cit y of Anaheim
Co
l
o
n
y
S
q
u
a
r
e
0
.
2
0
.
2
P
o
c
k
e
t
Cit y of Anaheim
Fo
u
n
d
e
r
s
'
1.
1
1
.
1
M
i
n
i
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
S
h
a
d
e
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
8
.
Cit y of Anaheim
Fr
i
e
n
d
s
h
i
p
P
l
a
z
a
0
.
7
0
.
7
P
o
c
k
e
t
Cit y of Anaheim
Ge
o
r
g
e
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
1
.
7
1
.
7
M
i
n
i
Cit y of Anaheim
Ju
l
i
a
n
n
a
0
.
6
0
.
6
M
i
n
i
F
u
l
l
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
9
.
City of Anaheim
La
P
a
l
m
a
1
6
.
3
2
5
.
3
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
s
o
c
c
e
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
,
a
n
d
f
u
l
l
s
p
o
r
t
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
t
o
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
.
City of Anaheim
Li
t
t
l
e
P
e
o
p
l
e
'
s
1.
1
1
.
1
M
i
n
i
City of Anaheim
Ma
n
z
a
n
i
t
a
6
.
3
6
.
3
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
s
k
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
,
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
City of Anaheim
Pe
a
r
s
o
n
1
8
.
9
1
8
.
9
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Re
n
o
v
a
t
e
f
i
e
l
d
l
i
g
h
t
s
,
s
t
a
d
i
u
m
,
l
a
g
o
o
n
s
,
a
m
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
,
a
n
d
p
o
o
l
.
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
tr
a
i
l
e
r
w
i
t
h
g
r
e
e
n
r
o
o
m
a
n
d
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
r
o
o
m
s
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
d
i
s
p
l
a
y
o
f
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
st
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
.
A
d
d
t
w
o
p
i
c
k
e
l
b
a
l
l
c
o
u
r
t
s
n
e
a
r
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
.
A
d
d
s
h
a
d
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
an
d
p
i
c
n
i
c
a
r
e
a
.
City of Anaheim
Ro
s
s
5
.
1
7
.
2
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
s
o
c
c
e
r
f
i
e
l
d
s
i
n
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
Y
M
C
A
t
o
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
,
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
in
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
City of Anaheim
Sa
g
e
7
.
9
7
.
9
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
City of Anaheim
Wi
l
l
o
w
8
.
7
8
.
7
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
n
g
l
e
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
,
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
.
City of Anaheim
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
An
a
h
e
i
m
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
8
.
4
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
OC
F
C
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
R
a
y
m
o
n
d
B
a
s
i
n
4.
9
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Oran g e Count y
Pa
u
l
i
n
e
a
n
d
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
0.
8
P
o
c
k
e
t
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Anaheim
To
t
a
l
74
.
0
1
1
3
.
2
To
t
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
1
0
)
5
5
,
6
8
1
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
1
.
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
2
5
)
61
,
8
5
3
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
(
2
0
2
5
)
1
.
8
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
3
DR
A
F
T
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ac
r
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
an
d
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ac
r
e
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
a
r
k
Ca
t
e
g
o
r
y
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
O
w
n
e
r
Bo
y
s
e
n
2
4
.
7
2
4
.
7
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
n
e
w
p
a
r
k
m
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
/
o
r
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
fi
e
l
d
s
.
City of Anaheim
Co
t
t
o
n
w
o
o
d
0
.
4
0
.
4
P
o
c
k
e
t
Cit y of Anaheim
En
e
r
g
y
F
i
e
l
d
3.
0
3
.
0
M
i
n
i
R
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
o
l
a
r
f
i
e
l
d
a
n
d
e
x
p
a
n
d
u
s
e
.
Cit y of Anaheim
Pa
l
m
L
a
n
e
6
.
2
6
.
2
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
A
d
d
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
,
f
i
t
n
e
s
s
z
o
n
e
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
.
Cit y of Anaheim
Pa
u
l
R
e
v
e
r
e
0
.
5
0
.
5
P
o
c
k
e
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
v
o
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
t
o
D
G
.
Cit y of Anaheim
Po
n
d
e
r
o
s
a
9
.
1
9
.
1
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
Cit y of Anaheim
St
o
d
d
a
r
d
9
.
8
9
.
8
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
Cit y of Anaheim
Wa
l
n
u
t
G
r
o
v
e
2.
9
2
.
9
M
i
n
i
Cit y of Anaheim
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Av
o
n
D
a
k
o
t
a
1.
0
P
o
c
k
e
t
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
,
y
o
u
t
h
c
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
F
a
m
i
l
y
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
City of Anaheim
Po
c
k
e
t
p
a
r
k
s
n
e
a
r
P
a
u
l
R
e
v
e
r
e
0.
1
P
o
c
k
e
t
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
City of Anaheim
SC
E
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
2.
5
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Southern California
To
t
a
l
56
.
6
6
0
.
2
To
t
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
1
0
)
5
6
,
1
5
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
1
.
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
2
5
)
59
,
5
8
4
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
(
2
0
2
5
)
1
.
0
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
4
DR
A
F
T
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ac
r
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
an
d
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ac
r
e
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
a
r
k
Ca
t
e
g
o
r
y
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
O
w
n
e
r
An
a
h
e
i
m
C
o
v
e
s
2
3
.
0
2
3
.
0
N
a
t
u
r
e
OCWD, SCE, OCFCD
Co
r
a
l
T
r
e
e
0.
4
0
.
4
P
o
c
k
e
t
City of Anaheim
Ed
i
s
o
n
7.
4
7
.
4
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
City of Anaheim
Ju
a
r
e
z
8.
8
8
.
8
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
L
i
g
h
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
,
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
m
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
.
City of Anaheim
Li
n
c
o
l
n
3
.
9
3
.
9
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
a
n
d
a
d
d
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
City of Anaheim
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
0
.
8
0
.
8
P
o
c
k
e
t
City of Anaheim
Mi
r
a
l
o
m
a
1
.
3
1
.
3
M
i
n
i
City of Anaheim
Pi
o
n
e
e
r
1
3
.
6
1
3
.
6
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
,
a
d
d
a
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
.
City of Anaheim
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
9.
6
9
.
6
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
f
i
e
l
d
s
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
a
n
d
a
d
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
City of Anaheim
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Al
o
e
G
r
e
e
n
s
1.
2
M
i
n
i
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
n
e
w
p
a
r
k
w
i
t
h
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
'
s
p
l
a
y
a
r
e
a
,
p
i
c
n
i
c
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
fe
a
t
u
r
e
.
Developer Built Park
Al
o
e
P
r
o
m
a
d
e
0.
6
P
o
c
k
e
t
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
n
e
w
p
a
r
k
w
i
t
h
a
r
t
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
.
Developer Built Park
Ba
l
l
R
o
a
d
B
a
s
i
n
19
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
O
C
W
D
f
o
r
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
s
o
c
c
e
r
o
r
a
q
u
a
t
i
c
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
w
i
t
h
an
A
n
a
h
i
e
m
R
i
v
e
r
w
a
l
k
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Developer Built Park
Ja
c
a
r
a
n
d
a
1.
1
P
o
c
k
e
t
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
n
e
w
p
a
r
k
w
i
t
h
o
f
f
l
e
a
s
h
d
o
g
a
r
e
a
,
b
o
c
c
e
b
a
l
l
,
f
i
t
n
e
s
s
z
o
n
e
a
n
d
pi
c
n
i
c
a
r
e
a
.
Developer Built Park
Ka
t
e
l
l
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
2
3
.
1
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
OC
W
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
L
a
P
a
l
m
a
B
a
s
i
n
4.
1
N
a
t
u
r
e
A
d
d
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
p
a
t
h
s
a
n
d
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
Orange County Water District
OC
W
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
M
i
l
l
e
r
B
a
s
i
n
12
.
4
N
a
t
u
r
e
A
d
d
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
p
a
t
h
s
a
n
d
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
Orange County Water District
OC
W
D
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
P
l
a
c
e
n
t
i
a
B
a
s
i
n
5.
1
N
a
t
u
r
e
A
d
d
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
p
a
t
h
s
a
n
d
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
Orange County Water District
SC
E
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
a
n
d
Ce
r
r
i
t
o
s
1.
9
M
i
n
i
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
Southern California Edison
SC
E
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
f
r
o
m
L
e
w
i
s
t
o
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
9.
1
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
d
d
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
p
a
t
h
s
a
n
d
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
Southern California Edison
So
u
t
h
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
0
.
4
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
J
r
.
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
3
.
0
Li
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Anaheim Union High District
To
t
a
l
68
.
8
1
6
9
.
8
To
t
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
1
0
)
5
5
,
9
0
4
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
1
.
2
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
2
5
)
66
,
7
9
8
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
(
2
0
2
5
)
2
.
5
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
5
DR
A
F
T
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ac
r
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
an
d
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ac
r
e
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
a
r
k
Ca
t
e
g
o
r
y
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
O
w
n
e
r
An
a
h
e
i
m
H
i
l
l
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
3
.
0
3
.
0
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
Orange Unified School Distrist
An
a
h
e
i
m
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
7
.
6
7
.
6
N
a
t
u
r
e
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
.
City of Anaheim
Ca
n
y
o
n
R
i
m
9.
0
9
.
0
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
.
City of Anaheim
De
e
r
C
a
n
y
o
n
1
3
3
.
5
1
3
3
.
5
N
a
t
u
r
e
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
t
o
S
a
n
t
a
A
n
a
c
a
n
y
o
n
r
o
a
d
,
b
i
k
e
p
a
t
h
.
City of Anaheim
Ea
s
t
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
G
y
m
6
.
1
6
.
1
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
t
h
e
L
o
g
a
n
W
e
l
l
s
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
S
k
a
t
e
z
o
n
e
.
City of Anaheim
Eu
c
a
l
y
p
t
u
s
1
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
L
i
g
h
t
e
x
i
s
i
t
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
.
City of Anaheim
Im
p
e
r
i
a
l
8
.
2
8
.
2
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
A
d
d
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
a
n
d
v
o
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
c
o
u
r
t
.
City of Anaheim
Oa
k
3
.
5
3
.
5
N
a
t
u
r
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
.
City of Anaheim
Oa
k
C
a
n
y
o
n
N
a
t
u
r
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
60
.
9
6
0
.
9
N
a
t
u
r
e
N
e
w
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
i
v
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
.
City of Anaheim
Ol
i
v
e
H
i
l
l
s
10
.
5
1
0
.
5
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
d
d
p
i
c
k
e
l
b
a
l
l
,
a
n
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
r
a
m
p
.
City of Anaheim
Pe
l
a
n
c
o
n
i
1
7
.
7
1
7
.
7
N
a
t
u
r
e
P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
,
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
,
p
i
c
n
i
c
a
n
d
l
o
o
p
t
r
a
i
l
w
i
t
h
f
o
o
t
b
r
i
d
g
e
.
City of Anaheim
Pe
r
a
l
t
a
C
a
n
y
o
n
1
9
.
3
1
9
.
3
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Re
p
l
a
c
e
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
r
o
o
m
,
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
o
r
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
p
l
a
y
,
a
n
d
a
d
d
an
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
i
c
n
i
c
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
.
City of Anaheim
Ri
v
e
r
d
a
l
e
8
.
0
8
.
0
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
A
d
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
City of Anaheim
Ro
n
a
l
d
R
e
a
g
a
n
1
5
.
8
1
5
.
8
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
O
p
e
n
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
y
a
r
d
.
City of Anaheim
Ro
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
1
.
8
1
.
8
M
i
n
i
City of Anaheim
Sy
c
a
m
o
r
e
10
.
0
1
0
.
0
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
L
i
g
h
t
e
x
i
s
i
t
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
.
City of Anaheim
Wa
l
n
u
t
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
3
.
1
3
.
1
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
City of Anaheim
Yo
r
b
a
1
3
.
0
1
9
.
0
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
E
x
p
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
t
o
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
p
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
.
OC Parks
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Ca
n
y
o
n
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
2
0
.
2
Li
g ht
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
a
j
o
i
n
t
u
s
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
g
y
m
a
n
d
p
o
o
l
.
Orange Unified School Distrist
Cr
e
s
c
e
n
t
M
i
d
d
l
e
a
n
d
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
1
3
.
3
R
e
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
e
,
l
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
Orange Unified School Distrist
El
R
a
n
c
h
o
7
.
5
Li
g ht
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
a
j
o
i
n
t
u
s
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
g
y
m
.
Orange Unified School Distrist
Es
p
e
r
a
n
z
a
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
3
1
.
3
Li
g ht
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A
d
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
.
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
a
j
o
i
n
t
u
s
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
g
y
m
a
n
d
p
o
o
l
.
Placentia/Yorba Linda School District
Fa
i
r
m
o
n
t
a
n
d
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
i
m
S
i
t
e
1
1
.
6
N
a
t
u
r
e
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
City of Anaheim
Fa
i
r
m
o
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
/
O
S
a
n
t
a
A
n
a
C
a
n
y
o
n
2
.
3
M
i
n
i
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
City of Anaheim
Go
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
n
e
x
t
t
o
f
i
r
e
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
15
.
6
N
a
t
u
r
e
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
City of Anaheim
No
h
l
R
a
n
c
h
e
a
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
6
.
0
N
a
t
u
r
e
N
e
w
p
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
r
i
d
i
n
g
,
h
i
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
b
i
k
e
p
a
t
h
s
,
n
a
t
i
v
e
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
.
City of Anaheim
SC
E
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
S
/
O
S
a
n
t
a
A
n
a
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
23
.
8
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
E
q
u
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
t
a
g
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
.
Southern California Edison
Se
r
r
a
n
o
a
n
d
N
o
h
l
R
a
n
c
h
3
.
8
M
i
n
i
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
City of Anaheim
Wa
l
n
u
t
C
a
n
y
o
n
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
a
n
d
v
i
s
t
a
4
.
8
N
a
t
u
r
e
N
e
w
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
City of Anaheim
To
t
a
l
34
1
.
0
4
8
7
.
1
To
t
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
1
0
)
5
6
,
3
8
0
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
6
.
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
2
5
)
59
,
5
4
2
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
(
2
0
2
5
)
8
.
2
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
6
DR
A
F
T
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
4/11/2018
Pa
r
k
o
r
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
a
m
e
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ac
r
e
s
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
an
d
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ac
r
e
s
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
a
r
k
Ca
t
e
g
o
r
y
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
O
w
n
e
r
Ci
t
y
T
o
t
a
l
68
9
.
2
1
1
5
2
.
3
To
t
a
l
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
3
3
6
,
2
6
5
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
2
.
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
0
2
5
)
3
6
7
,
3
9
0
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
/
1
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
(
2
0
2
5
)
3
.
1
Anaheim Parks Plan: Appendix C
Anaheim Community Services
April 11, 2018
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
-1- PC2018-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVE AND ADOPT
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00519
(DEV2018-00020)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Council (“City Council”) did adopt the Anaheim General
Plan by Resolution No. 69R-644, showing the general description and extent of possible future
development within the City; and
WHEREAS, by adoption of Resolution No. PC2004-95 on May 25, 2004, the City
Council adopted a comprehensive update to the General Plan for the City of Anaheim
(collectively, the "2004 General Plan Update"); and
WHEREAS, in February 2017, the City Council approved funding for the preparation of
a park needs assessment, referred to as the “Anaheim Parks Plan,” to evaluate the City’s park
system; make recommendations for the provision of parks and facilities and improvements to
existing park assets; and, assess current park conditions and maintenance; and
WHEREAS, The City's Parks Commission reviewed a draft of the Anaheim Parks Plan at
its meeting on April 11, 2018 and recommended City Council approval of the document. Staff
anticipates that the City Council will review the Anaheim Parks Plan document at its meeting on
May 8, 2018; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director has therefore initiated General Plan Amendment No.
2018-00519, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as
if set forth in full, to amend text within the Green Element of the General Plan consistent with
the recommendations of the Anaheim Parks Plan; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 also proposes to amend "Figure
LU-4: Land Use Plan” of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to re-designate City-owned
park properties to the "Parks" land use designation and update the designation of other park
facilities, as shown on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 would specifically change the
General Plan land use designation to “Parks” for properties shown in Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 also proposes to amend "Figure
C-5: Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities” of the Circulation Element of the General Plan to
re-designate City-owned park properties to into "Parks" land use designation as shown on
Exhibit A; and
-2- PC2018-***
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 also proposes to amend "Figure
G-1: Green Plan” of the Green Element of the General Plan to re-designate City-owned park
properties to the "Parks" land use designation, as shown on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 also proposes to amend "Figure
G-4: Existing Park Facilities” of the Green Element of the General Plan to update existing park
facilities due to new and planned development, as shown on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 proposes to amend "Table G-1:
Existing Park Facilities” of the Green Element of the General Plan to update existing park
facilities and amenities due to new and planned development, as shown on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic
Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on April 16, 2018, at 5:00 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to consider General Plan Amendment No. 2018-
00519; hear and consider evidence for and against General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519,
and related actions; and, to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA
Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's
Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this Planning Commission determines that these actions are
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15060(c)(2) of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations. These actions are exempt because the amendments to the
General Plan and Zoning Code will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect
physical change in the environment. The sites that staff is requesting to be designated for "Parks"
land use in the General Plan and/or reclassified in the Zoning Code to the Public Recreational
(PR) Zone are existing park sites. Therefore, the proposed action will not result in identifying
any additional or new sites as proposed or preferred park sites. Nothing in the proposed actions
commits the City to constructing specific new parks or any improvements to existing parks. All
future uses and/or park improvements will be conditioned on CEQA compliance on a project-by-
project basis pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15004(b)(2), which will be coordinated with
the existing planning, review and project approval processes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation
and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does hereby find:
1. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 maintains the
internal consistency of the General Plan, because there would be no change to the Goals and
Policies of the General Plan.
-3- PC2018-***
2. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 would not be
detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the
proposed amendment to the Anaheim General Plan does not relate to any development project,
and any future projects would be subject to the Zoning Code requirements.
3. That the properties to be re-designated by proposed General Plan Amendment
No. 2018-00519 are physically suitable to accommodate existing park facilities, including but
not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility
with surrounding land uses because the proposed amendment is designed to complement existing
land use designations.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the
City of Anaheim approve and adopt General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519 in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of an ordinance
reclassifying the properties affected by General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00519.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
April 16, 2018.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
-4- PC2018-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 16, 2018, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of April, 2018.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
127403 / LM
-5- PC2018-***
EXHIBIT “A”
Ho
l
d
e
r
S
t
Kn
o
t
t
A
v
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
Be
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
Da
l
e
S
t
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
A
v
e
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
S
t
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
Mu
l
l
e
r
S
t
La Palma Ave
Crescent Ave
Lincoln Ave
Broadway
Orange Ave
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Chapman Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Nu
t
w
o
o
d
S
t
9t
h
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Le
w
i
s
S
t
Lo
a
r
a
S
t
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
Do
u
g
l
a
s
s
R
d
S
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
Disney Way
Gene Autry Way
W
e
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
O
li
v
e
S
t
E
a
s
t
S
tS o u t h S t
V e r m o n t A v e
S a n t a A n a S tBroadwayLincolnAve
S y c a m o r e S tNorthSt
Ball Rd
Wagner Ave
South St
La Palma Ave
Romneya Dr
Orangethorpe Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Le
m
o
n
S
t
Ra
y
m
o
n
d
A
v
e
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Ac
a
c
i
a
A
v
e
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
P l a c e n t i a A v e
Su
n
k
i
s
t
S
t
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
S
t
Crowther Ave
O r a n g e t h o r p e A v e
M i r a l o m a A v e
L a P a l m a A v e
R
e
d
G
u
m
S
t
K
r
a
e
m
e
r
B
l
v
d
M
ill
e
r
S
t
T
ustinA
ve
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
L
a
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
Ke
l
l
o
g
g
D
r
Esp er an z a R dOrangethorpeAve
La Palma Ave
ImperialHwy
Sa
n
t
i
a g o B l
M e a t s A v e
I m p e r i a l H w y
NohlRanch R d
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
Fairm
ontBlvd
C a n y o n RimRd S e r
r a n o A v e
W
eir
C
a
n
yonRd
O a k C a nyon D r
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
B
l
u
e
G
u
m
S
t
Cerritos A v e
|ÿ241
|ÿ91|ÿ90
|ÿ55
|ÿ57
|ÿ91
§¨¦5
Romneya Dr A
n
a
h
e
i
m
H
ill
s
R
d
R
R R
R
R
R
R
k
")!(SP
Land Use Plan
Figure LU-4 Page LU-13
City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
Note: Land Use Map includes Anaheim's Sphere of Influence.
Commercial
Regional
General
Neighborhood Center
Commercial Recreation
Residential
Corridor (0-13.0 du/ac)
Medium (0-36.0 du/ac)
Low Medium (0-18.0 du/ac)
Low Medium Hillside (0-6 du/ac)
Low (0-6.5 du/ac)
Estate (0-1.5 du/ac)
R
Office
High
Low
Industrial
Institutional
School
Open Space
Parks
Water
Railroad
Non-Residential Mixed-Use
Mixed-Use
General Park Location
General School Location")
!(P
S
City Boundary
Intermodal Transportation Centerk
Sphere-of-Influence
Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: December 19, 2017
0 1 20.5 Miles
ExistingEXHIBIT "A"
Ho
l
d
e
r
S
t
Kn
o
t
t
A
v
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
Be
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
Da
l
e
S
t
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
A
v
e
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
S
t
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
Mu
l
l
e
r
S
t
La Palma Ave
Crescent Ave
Lincoln Ave
Broadway
Orange Ave
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Chapman Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Nu
t
w
o
o
d
S
t
9t
h
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Le
w
i
s
S
t
Lo
a
r
a
S
t
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
Do
u
g
l
a
s
s
R
d
S
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
Disney Way
Gene Autry Way
W
e
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
O
li
v
e
S
t
E
a
s
t
S
tS o u t h S t
V e r m o n t A v e
S a n t a A n a S tBroadwayLincolnAve
S y c a m o r e S tNorthSt
Ball Rd
Wagner Ave
South St
La Palma Ave
Romneya Dr
Orangethorpe Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Le
m
o
n
S
t
Ra
y
m
o
n
d
A
v
e
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Ac
a
c
i
a
A
v
e
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
P l a c e n t i a A v e
Su
n
k
i
s
t
S
t
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
S
t
Crowther Ave
O r a n g e t h o r p e A v e
M i r a l o m a A v e
L a P a l m a A v e
R
e
d
G
u
m
S
t
K
r
a
e
m
e
r
B
l
v
d
M
ill
e
r
S
t
T
ustinA
ve
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
L
a
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
Ke
l
l
o
g
g
D
r
Esp er an z a R dOrangethorpeAve
La Palma Ave
ImperialHwy
Sa
n
t
i
a g o B l
M e a t s A v e
I m p e r i a l H w y
NohlRanch R d
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
Fairm
ontBlvd
C a n y o n RimRd S e r
r a n o A v e
W
eir
C
a
n
yonRd
O a k C a nyon D r
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
B
l
u
e
G
u
m
S
t
Cerritos A v e
|ÿ241
|ÿ91|ÿ90
|ÿ55
|ÿ57
|ÿ91
§¨¦5
Romneya Dr A
n
a
h
e
i
m
H
ill
s
R
d
R
R R
R
R
R
R
k
")!(SP
Land Use Plan
Figure LU-4 Page LU-13
City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
Note: Land Use Map includes Anaheim's Sphere of Influence.
Commercial
Regional
General
Neighborhood Center
Commercial Recreation
Residential
Corridor (0-13.0 du/ac)
Medium (0-36.0 du/ac)
Low Medium (0-18.0 du/ac)
Low Medium Hillside (0-6 du/ac)
Low (0-6.5 du/ac)
Estate (0-1.5 du/ac)
R
Office
High
Low
Industrial
Institutional
School
Open Space
Parks
Water
Railroad
Non-Residential Mixed-Use
Mixed-Use
General Park Location
General School Location")
!(P
S
City Boundary
Intermodal Transportation Centerk
Sphere-of-Influence
Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: April 16, 2018
0 1 20.5 Miles
Proposed
IA
IA
k
k
Ho
l
d
e
r
S
t
Kn
o
t
t
A
v
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
Be
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
Da
l
e
S
t
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
A
v
e
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
S
t
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
Mu
l
l
e
r
S
t
La Palma Ave
Crescent Ave
Lincoln Ave
Broadway
Orange Ave
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Chapman Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Nu
t
w
o
o
d
S
t
9t
h
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Le
w
i
s
S
t
Lo
a
r
a
S
t
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
Do
u
g
l
a
s
s
R
d
S
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
Disney Way
Gene Autry Way
W
e
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
O
li
v
e
S
t
E
a
s
t
S
tS o u t h S t
V e r m o n t A v e
S a n t a A n a S tBroadwayLincolnAve
S y c a m o r e S tNorthSt
Ball Rd
Wagner Ave
South St
La Palma Ave
Romneya Dr
Orangethorpe Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Le
m
o
n
S
t
Ra
y
m
o
n
d
A
v
e
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Ac
a
c
i
a
A
v
e
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
P l a c e n t i a A v e
Su
n
k
i
s
t
S
t
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
S
t
Crowther Ave
O r a n g e t h o r p e A v e
M i r a l o m a A v e
L a P a l m a A v e
R
e
d
G
u
m
S
t
K
r
a
e
m
e
r
B
l
v
d
M
ill
e
r
S
t
T
ustinA
ve
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
L
a
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
Ke
l
l
o
g
g
D
r
Esperan z a R dOrangethorpeAve
La Palma Ave
ImperialHwy
S a n t i a g o B l
M e a t s A v e
I m p e r i a l H w y
NohlRanch R d
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
Fair
m
ontBlvd
C a n y o n RimRd S e r r a n o A v e
W
eir
C
a
n
yonRd
O a k C a nyon D r
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
B
l
u
e
G
u
m
S
t
Cerritos A v e
|ÿ241
|ÿ91|ÿ90
|ÿ55
|ÿ57
|ÿ91
§¨¦5
Romneya Dr A
n
a
h
e
i
m
H
ill
s
R
d
Existing and PlannedBicycle Facilities
Figure C-5 Page C-33
0 1 20.5 Miles City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
School
City Boundary
Park-and-RideIA
Transit Stationk
Existing
Class I Bike Path
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route
Off Road Trail
Planned
Class I Bike Path
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route
Off Road Trail
Class I Regional Bike Path
Parks/Open Space
Sphere-of-Influence
Existing
IA
IA
k
k
Ho
l
d
e
r
S
t
Kn
o
t
t
A
v
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
Be
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
Da
l
e
S
t
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
A
v
e
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
S
t
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
Mu
l
l
e
r
S
t
La Palma Ave
Crescent Ave
Lincoln Ave
Broadway
Orange Ave
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Chapman Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Nu
t
w
o
o
d
S
t
9t
h
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Le
w
i
s
S
t
Lo
a
r
a
S
t
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
Do
u
g
l
a
s
s
R
d
S
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
Disney Way
Gene Autry Way
W
e
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
O
li
v
e
S
t
E
a
s
t
S
tS o u t h S t
V e r m o n t A v e
S a n t a A n a S tBroadwayLincolnAve
S y c a m o r e S tNorthSt
Ball Rd
Wagner Ave
South St
La Palma Ave
Romneya Dr
Orangethorpe Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Le
m
o
n
S
t
Ra
y
m
o
n
d
A
v
e
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Ac
a
c
i
a
A
v
e
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
P l a c e n t i a A v e
Su
n
k
i
s
t
S
t
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
S
t
Crowther Ave
O r a n g e t h o r p e A v e
M i r a l o m a A v e
L a P a l m a A v e
R
e
d
G
u
m
S
t
K
r
a
e
m
e
r
B
l
v
d
M
ill
e
r
S
t
T
ustinA
ve
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
L
a
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
Ke
l
l
o
g
g
D
r
Esperan z a R dOrangethorpeAve
La Palma Ave
ImperialHwy
Sa
n
t
i
a g o B l
M e a t s A v e
I m p e r i a l H w y
NohlRanch R d
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
F
air
m
ontBlvd
C a n y on RimRd S e r r a n o A v e
W
eir
C
a
n
yonRd
O a k C a nyon D r
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
B
l
u
e
G
u
m
S
t
Cerritos A v e
|ÿ241
|ÿ91|ÿ90
|ÿ55
|ÿ57
|ÿ91
§¨¦5
Romneya Dr A
n
a
h
e
i
m
H
ill
s
R
d
Existing and PlannedBicycle Facilities
Figure C-5 Page C-33
0 1 20.5 Miles City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
School
City Boundary
Park-and-RideIA
Transit Stationk
Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: April 16, 2017
Existing
Class I Bike Path
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route
Off Road Trail
Planned
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route
Off Road Trail
Class I Regional Bike Path
Parks/Open Space
Sphere-of-Influence
Class I Bike Path
Proposed
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-i
Green Element
INTRODUCTION: THE GREENING OF ANAHEIM .................................................................. 1
A Unique, Comprehensive Plan .................................................................................... 1
Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1
Relationship to Other Elements .................................................................................... 2
Achieving the Vision ................................................................................................... 2
THE GREEN PLAN: INTEGRATING OPEN SPACE AMENITIES ................................................ 3
Plan Objectives ........................................................................................................... 3
Plan Description ......................................................................................................... 3
Policy Foundation ....................................................................................................... 4
CONSERVING NATURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................... 7
Goals and Policies ...................................................................................................... 7
Hillside Development and Grading ........................................................................... 7
Ridgelines, Views and Vistas .................................................................................... 8
Utility Easements ................................................................................................... 9
Recreational Water Uses ......................................................................................... 9
Water Conservation .............................................................................................. 11
Groundwater Protection ....................................................................................... 13
Storm Water and Urban Runoff Management .......................................................... 14
Emissions Reduction............................................................................................. 18
Reducing Vehicle Work Trips ................................................................................ 19
Expanding Transit Trips ........................................................................................ 19
Sound Land Use Planning ..................................................................................... 20
Efficient, Clean-burning Public Transit .................................................................... 21
Educating the Public ............................................................................................. 22
Conservation of Biological Resources ..................................................................... 23
Energy Conservation ............................................................................................ 27
Waste Management and Recycling ......................................................................... 28
Building Performance Standards ............................................................................ 29
ENHANCING PARKS AND RECREATION PROGRAMS ....................................................... 31
Park Types ........................................................................................................... 3231
Park Planning Areas .............................................................................................. 3533
Park Needs .......................................................................................................... 4139
Recreation Programs and Trends ............................................................................ 4139
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-ii | Revised April 2018May 2004
Goals and Policies ................................................................................................ 4240
Adequate Supply of Parks ................................................................................. 4240
Broad Range of Recreational Opportunities ......................................................... 4341
Park Safety, Maintenance and Rehabilitation ........................................................ 4442
Community Outreach ....................................................................................... 4543
IMPROVING TRAILS TO CONNECT ANAHEIM .............................................................. 4745
Equestrian, Riding and Hiking Trails Plan ................................................................. 4745
Components of the Plan: Trails Hierarchy ................................................................ 4846
Goals and Policies ................................................................................................ 5250
Completing the Trail System.............................................................................. 5250
BEAUTIFYING THE CITY: PUBLIC LANDSCAPING AND STREET TREES ........................... 5351
Goals and Policies ................................................................................................ 5452
Public Landscaping and Street Trees .................................................................. 5452
List of Figures
Figure G-1 Green Plan ..................................................................................... 5
Figure G-2 Groundwater Protection Zone ........................................................ 15
Figure G-3 Mineral Resource Map ................................................................... 25
Figure G-4 Existing Park Facilities ................................................................ 3735
Figure G-5 Equestrian, Riding and Hiking Trails Plan ..................................... 4947
List of Tables
Table G-1: Existing Park Acreages and Facilities ................................................. 3937
Table G-2: Inventory of Existing & Planned Trails ............................................... 4846
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-1
Introduction:
The Greening of Anaheim
A UNIQUE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
he Green Element combines Anaheim’s Conservation, Open Space, Parks,
Recreation and Community Services Elements into a single, comprehensive plan
to add more green areas throughout the City and protect and enhance its natural
and recreational resources. The Green Element’s philosophy is broad and inclusive. It
seeks not only to preserve, but also to conserve. This includes vital natural resources
such as water, energy, air, and wildlife. The Green Element also includes goals and
policies for landscaping, enhancing the City’s corridors and its identity. By combining
three elements into one comprehensive plan, the City recognizes that open space,
conservation and parks are part of an integrated network of green resources.
PURPOSE
Anaheim‘s “green” resources include the
vast open space and habitat areas that
frame the eastern edge of the City, the
various natural resources that protect
and enhance our quality of life, the
numerous park and recreation areas and
trails that serve all of our residents, and
the landscaped edges that distinguish
Anaheim’s diverse communities and
transportation corridors. The purpose of
the Green Element is to build upon this
network of resources to create a
greener, more beautiful Anaheim. The
City and its residents are already proud
of its open space amenities, but it
recognizes the need to add more local
parks, trail networks and landscaping.
T
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-2 | Revised April 2018May 2004
The Green Element is unique in that it combines two required elements of the General
Plan – Open Space and Conservation – with an optional, but important Element – Parks,
Recreation and Community Services. Realizing the importance of landscaping as a
unifying ingredient in enhancing community image, a landscape component is also
included in the Green Element.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS
The Green Element is intimately related to at least three other elements of the General
Plan: Land Use, Economic Development and Community Design. The Land Use
Element designates appropriate areas for open space and recreation. A quality system of
parks and well-landscaped corridors supports the Economic Development Element goals
and policies that promote economic activity and support local businesses. Enhanced
gateways and landscaped edges help to define neighborhoods and districts, thereby
supporting the goals of the Community Design Element.
Like parks and recreation facilities, libraries and other community serving facilities
provide important community amenities for the residents of Anaheim. These vital
components of the Community Services Department are addressed in the Public Services
and Facilities Element.
ACHIEVING THE VISION
The major goals of the Anaheim Vision, related to the Green Element, include:
Improved landscaping and enhancement of boulevards and public rights-of-way;
Preservation of open space, ridgelines, public scenic vistas and specimen trees;
Provision for more parks and community centers; and
Enhanced trail network connecting City and County open space and regional trail
systems.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-3
The Green Plan: Integrating
Open Space Amenities
PLAN OBJECTIVES
he overriding purpose of the Green Element is to combine all of Anaheim’s open
space, conservation, recreation and landscaping resources into one
comprehensive, integrated document. Rather than separate these components,
the Green Element recognizes their interrelationship and builds upon it with the inclusion
of a “Green Plan,” as seen in Figure G-1. The objectives of the Green Plan are to:
Expand public parks and open space amenities;
Improve the City’s trail and bicycle network for local and regional connections;
Beautify arterial corridors with landscape plans, edge treatments and gateways; and
Use existing opportunities, such as easements, vacant land and the Santa Ana River
to expand accessible open space and recreation opportunities.
PLAN DESCRIPTION
The Green Plan uses a variety of open space opportunities and resources to create a
unified vision for a more beautiful, healthy city. As seen in Figure G-1, tThe Green Plan
considers not only existing parks and open space, but also potential recreational
opportunities, such as schools, utility easements, water uses, and vacant land. It also
identifies opportunities to enhance the appearance of existing areas through enhanced
community edges and City entryways. The emphasis of the Green Plan is not only to
make spatial connections throughout the City through parks, trails, open space and
landscaping but also to create connections between policies and plans that help the City
conserve its natural and cultural resources such as water, energy and historic districts.
T
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-4 | Revised April 2018May 2004
POLICY FOUNDATION
Like the Land Use Plan graphically displays the policy foundation of the Land Use
Element and other land use related policies of the General Plan, the Green Plan is
provided at the beginning of this Element to depict much of the policy foundation of the
Green Element and to display the locations of various “green” resources and
opportunities that contribute to making Anaheim a greener, more beautiful and healthy
community.
$+
$+
$+
$+
$+
$+
$+
$+
Ho
l
d
e
r
S
t
Kn
o
t
t
A
v
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
Be
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
Da
l
e
S
t
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
A
v
e
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
S
t
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
Mu
l
l
e
r
S
t
La Palma Ave
Crescent Ave
Lincoln Ave
Broadway
Orange Ave
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Chapman Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Nu
t
w
o
o
d
S
t
9t
h
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Le
w
i
s
S
t
Lo
a
r
a
S
t
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
Do
u
g
l
a
s
s
R
d
S
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
Disney Way
Gene Autry Way
W
e
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
O
li
v
e
S
t
E
a
s
t
S
tS o u t h S t
V e r m o n t A v e
S a n t a A n a S tBroadwayLincolnAve
S y c a m o r e S tNorthSt
Ball Rd
Wagner Ave
South St
La Palma Ave
Romneya Dr
Orangethorpe Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Le
m
o
n
S
t
Ra
y
m
o
n
d
A
v
e
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Ac
a
c
i
a
A
v
e
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
P l a c e n t i a A v e
Su
n
k
i
s
t
S
t
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
S
t
Crowther Ave
O r a n g e t h o r p e A v e
M i r a l o m a A v e
L a P a l m a A v e
R
e
d
G
u
m
S
t
K
r
a
e
m
e
r
B
l
v
d
M
ill
e
r
S
t
TustinA
ve
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
L
a
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
Ke
l
l
o
g
g
D
r
Esperan z a R dOrangethorpeAve
La Palma Ave
ImperialHwy
S a n t i a g o B l
M e a t s A v e
I m p e r i a l H w y
NohlRanch R d
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
Fair
m
ontBlvd
C a n y o n RimRd S e r r a n o A v e
W
eir
C
a
n
yonRd
O a k C a nyon D r
M
e
t
r
o
li
n
k
B
l
u
e
G
u
m
S
t
Cerritos A v e
|ÿ241
|ÿ91|ÿ90
|ÿ55
|ÿ57
|ÿ91
§¨¦5
Romneya Dr A
n
a
h
e
i
m
H
ill
s
R
d
")!(SP
Green Plan
City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
Figure G-1 Page G-5
0 1 20.5 Miles
*Residential areas outside half-mile radius ofNeighborhood or Community Park or quarter- mile radius of a Mini Park.
Public Parks
Open Space
Golf Course
Public Schools
Water Uses
Groundwater Protection Zone
City Boundary
Sphere-of-Influence
Riding/Hiking, Pedestrian and Mountain Bike Trail
Park Deficiency Areas*
General Park Location(P
General School Location)S
Cultural Facilities$
Existing
Ho
l
d
e
r
S
t
Kn
o
t
t
A
v
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
Be
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
Da
l
e
S
t
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
A
v
e
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
S
t
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
Mu
l
l
e
r
S
t
La Palma Ave
Crescent Ave
Lincoln Ave
Broadway
Orange Ave
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Chapman Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Nu
t
w
o
o
d
S
t
9t
h
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Le
w
i
s
S
t
Lo
a
r
a
S
t
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
Do
u
g
l
a
s
s
R
d
S
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
Disney Way
Gene Autry Way
W
e
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
O
li
v
e
S
t
E
a
s
t
S
tS o u t h S t
V e r m o n t A v e
S a n t a A n a S tBroadwayLincolnAve
S y c a m o r e S tNorthSt
Ball Rd
Wagner Ave
South St
La Palma Ave
Romneya Dr
Orangethorpe Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Le
m
o
n
S
t
Ra
y
m
o
n
d
A
v
e
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Ac
a
c
i
a
A
v
e
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
P l a c e n t i a A v e
Su
n
k
i
s
t
S
t
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
S
t
Crowther Ave
O r a n g e t h o r p e A v e
M i r a l o m a A v e
L a P a l m a A v e
R
e
d
G
u
m
S
t
K
r
a
e
m
e
r
B
l
v
d
M
ill
e
r
S
t
TustinA
ve
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
L
a
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
Ke
l
l
o
g
g
D
r
Esperan z a R dOrangethorpeAve
La Palma Ave
ImperialHwy
Sa
n
t
i
a g o B l
M e a t s A v e
I m p e r i a l H w y
NohlRanch R d
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
F
air
m
ontBlvd
C a n y on RimRd S e r r a n o A v e
W
eir
C
a
n
yonRd
O a k C a nyon D r
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
B
l
u
e
G
u
m
S
t
Cerritos A v e
|ÿ241
|ÿ91|ÿ90
|ÿ55
|ÿ57
|ÿ91
§¨¦5
Romneya Dr A
n
a
h
e
i
m
H
ill
s
R
d
")!(SP
Green Plan
City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
Figure G-1 Page G-5
0 1 20.5 Miles
*Residential areas outside half-mile radius ofNeighborhood or Community Park or quarter- mile radius of a Mini Park.
Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: April 16, 2018
Public Parks
Open Space
Golf Course
Public Schools
Water Uses
Groundwater Protection Zone
City Boundary
Sphere-of-Influence
Riding/Hiking, Pedestrian and Mountain Bike Trail
Park Deficiency Areas*
General Park Location(P
General School Location)S
Cultural Facilities$
Proposed
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-6 | Revised April 2018May 2004
This page intentionally left blank
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-7
Conserving Natural
Resources
onserving natural resources is a fundamental part of the Green Element, and a
required element of the General Plan. This section addresses the Green
Element’s goal of using natural resources wisely and promoting sustainable
growth and development. By placing this section within the Green Element, the City of
Anaheim recognizes that conservation and preservation of natural resources is the
backbone of a City’s efforts to protect and enhance the environment. Future
development should be balanced with the need to preserve the natural environment in
order to ensure that current and future generations are able to enjoy the benefits of this
important resource.
This section addresses the important concerns of water conservation, water quality, air
quality, biological resources, energy conservation, and waste mana gement and recycling.
GOALS AND POLICIES
Natural Open Space
A vital component of the Green Element is the comprehensive and long-range
preservation and enhancement of open space areas. This includes open space for habitat
preservation, outdoor recreation and water uses. Although most of the western,
northern and southern areas of Anaheim are built out and adjoin other cities, the Hill and
Canyon Area contains a significant amount of open space and abuts major open space
resources, including the Chino Hills State Park, the Cleveland National Forest and the
Santa Ana River. Another vital component of the Green Element are the existing and
planned trails that connect these valuable resources, as discussed later in the Element
(see Figure G-6 for trail locations).
Hillside Development and Grading
Natural slopes are one of the primary aesthetic resources in the Hill and Canyon Area.
Hillsides, which are visible throughout the area, create a dramatic backdrop for
surrounding residential neighborhoods and help define the character of the area.
C
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-8 | Revised April 2018May 2004
Development on hillsides within the Hill and Canyon Area, where land use designations
permit, requires careful siting, grading, and design in order to minimize exposure to
hazards and to maintain and enhance the scenic quality of the area.
The Public Works Department regulates and processes applications for grading permits.
Development plans must follow the guidelines of the Land Development and Resources
Code and Zoning Code regarding grading, excavations and fills and specimen tree
removal, and must include an erosion and sediment control plan.
GOAL 1.1:
Maintain strict standards for hillside grading to preserve environmental and aesthetic
resources.
Policies:
1)Require that infill hillside development minimize alteration of the natural
landforms and natural vegetation.
2)Limit grading to the amount necessary to provide stable areas for structural
foundations, street rights-of-way, parking facilities, and other intended uses.
3)Minimize import/export associated with grading.
4)Grading for infill projects should be kept to an absolute minimum, with
developments following the natural contours of the land, and prohibited in
steep slope areas.
Ridgelines, Views and Vistas
Views and vistas in Anaheim are important visual
amenities. From most areas of Anaheim, the
contours of the Hill and Canyon Area and the
Santa Ana Mountains are visible. Other scenic
amenities such as golf courses and the Santa
Ana River also provide visual relief from the built
environment and are important visual amenities
and landmarks.
GOAL 2.1:
Preserve views of ridgelines, natural open space and other scenic vistas wherever
possible.
Policies:
1)Control infill development on visually significant ridgelines, canyon edges
and hilltops through sensitive site planning and appropriate landscaping to
ensure development is visually unobtrusive.
Scenic view looking northeast across the
SR-241 toll road.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-9
2)Encourage development that preserves natural contours and views of existing
backdrop ridgelines or prominent views.
3)Site parks, nature centers and trails to take advantage of natural vistas.
4)Encourage future development and public improvements to maximize private
and public views of golf course fairways.
Utility Easements
The City of Anaheim continues to expand its trail and open space system by using the
land under Southern California Edison (SCE) power lines. The concept is to use utility
easements as a landscaped open space amenity for the City and integrate them into the
City trail system.
Three pPower line easements are mapped onconsidered for the Green Plan (Figure G-1)
with the ultimate goal of improving them to provide trails for recreation, bicycle and
pedestrian uses. Linkages to existing parks, open space and other trail systems are also
being considered.
GOAL 3.1:
Actively plan for the use of utility easements as recreational trails and open space
amenities.
Policies:
1)Coordinate with Southern California Edison to pursue the implementation of
recreational and open space amenities on utility easements.
Recreational Water Uses
The Santa Ana River flows into Anaheim from the northeast and hugs the northeastern
edge of the City as it moves south to the ocean. The Santa Ana River Trail connects
with Orange County’s riding and hiking trails and follows the river as it moves south to
the ocean in Huntington Beach. In addition, Carbon Creek flows through the City from
the northeast to the southwest and could become a recreational and visual amenity.
Several water basins along the Santa Ana River are used for recreation purposes:
Anaheim Lakes, the Miller Retarding Basin and the Five Coves area, which is located
north of Ball Road along the western side of the river.
As opportunities for acquiring lands for future open space and recreational resources in
the City are limited, the City will continue to look for new ways to utilize these areas
along the Santa Ana River and Carbon Creek to provide additional resources and to
provide more links from surrounding development to these waterways.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-10 | Revised April 2018May 2004
GOAL 4.1:
Maximize the recreational and scenic potential of existing reservoirs, b asins and
waterways.
Policies:
1) Support the County of Orange to continue in their efforts to upgrade and
maintain the Santa Ana River Trail.
2) Work with the County of Orange and the Orange County Water District to
maintain and improve the recreational and scenic resources of the Anaheim
Lakes and Five Coves areas and other appropriate water resource areas,
including retarding basins and reservoirs.
Water Conservation
Anaheim normally pumps most of its drinking water
(between 65% to 70%) from the local groundwater basin,
and purchases the remainder from the Metropolitan
Water District of Southern California, which obtains its
water from the Colorado River and the State Water
Project in northern California. The Lenain Filtration Plant,
the only City-owned facility of its type in the County,
filters incoming Colorado River water provides up to 15
million gallons of drinking water per day for Anaheim
residents.
Managing Water Resources – Orange County’s major
river – the Santa Ana River – flows through Anaheim on
its way to the ocean and places the City in a key position
of responsibility to manage its water resources. The river
plays a vital role in recharging the groundwater basin. Several retention basins formed
by levees along the river help to replenish the water table. The Orange County Water
District (OCWD) has the responsibility for managing and conserving the groundwater
basin; it uses approximately 750 acres of the Santa Ana
Riverbed between Katella Avenue and Imperial Highway
for ponding imported water from the Metropolitan Water
District and natural flows of the river.
OCWD owns two large spreading basins, Anaheim Lake
and Warner Basin. The Kraemer Water Conservation
Basin, along with the Miller Retarding Basin, provides
more recharge capabilities. Northeast of the Riverside
(SR-91) Freeway the alluvial soil is considered highly
suitable for groundwater replenishment.
The City of Anaheim has a long history
in supplying its own high quality water:
1879 - Citizens voted to begin their
own water utility.
1928 - City was one of 13 cities to
form the Metropolitan Water
District (MWD).
1942 - City began purchasing
imported water from the
Colorado River Aqueduct.
Introduction to Santa Ana River
Watershed: The Santa Ana River
Watershed is the largest in Orange
County, covering 153.2 square miles.
The river begins almost 75 miles away
in the San Bernardino Mountains,
crossing central Orange County before
emptying into the Pacific Ocean. The
Orange County portion of the
watershed includes portions of the
cities of Anaheim, Brea, Huntington
Beach, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana,
Villa Park, and Yorba Linda.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-11
Conservation Efforts – The City of Anaheim is actively involved in resource management.
The municipal utility operates its own state-of-the-art Lenain Filtration Plant, and has a
long history of promoting wise use of its water and energy resources. As one of the
original signatories to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding Urban
Water Conservation in California, Anaheim Public Utilities implements the MOU’s Best
Management Practices – fourteen proven water conservation measures.
Water Conservation
Anaheim provides water conservation, groundwater protection and water efficiency
programs. Its many commercial and residential water efficiency programs are linked to
the City website where customers can ask questions or sign up for Anaheim’s many
Advantage Services programs. Anaheim’s award-winning annual Water Awareness
Campaign reaches out to the entire community with its valuable water conservation
message.
Anaheim also maintains a number of
educational and incentive programs and
drought-tolerant landscaping examples aimed
at promoting water conservation. These
include water conservation partnership
programs with public schools, the Home
Gardener’s Water Conservation Program, the
rebate program that rewards customers for
replacing old fixtures with water efficient ones,
and the Waterwise Demonstration Garden, to
name a few.
One of the water conservation challenges
facing Anaheim is balancing the desire to
maintain historical landscaping patterns with
the need to provide more water-efficient
alternatives. This dilemma will necessitate
determining under what circumstances and in
what locations certain drought-tolerant
landscaping is appropriate.
GOAL 5.1:
Continue Anaheim’s water conservation efforts to ensure that all City facilities are water
efficient.
Policies:
1)Continue to inspect, maintain and enhance City facilities relative to their
water use.
The Waterwise Demonstration Garden, which
borders the Amtrak Anaheim Station, lends
identity and prominence to the station.
Designed to illustrate the beauty of waterwise
landscaping, the plants were selected for their
contrast in colors, textures and shapes. The
garden includes a water-efficient irrigation
system as well.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-12 | Revised April 2018May 2004
2) Continue inter-departmental coordination of water use and conservation
policies to improve City-facility water use.
3) Specify and install water-conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings in public
facilities such as parks, community centers, and government buildings.
4) Continue and expand Anaheim’s water rebate program.
GOAL 5.2:
Continue and expand Anaheim’s educational outreach and incentives programs aimed at
water conservation.
Policies:
1) Continue to educate the public through the award-winning annual Water
Awareness Month Campaign.
2) Continue to offer all Anaheim public and private schools the opportunity to
participate in the Water Conservation Poster Contest.
3) Continue to encourage landscape projects employing water efficient
irrigation.
4) Maximize opportunities to install local or regional groundwater recharge
facilities.
Water Quality
The Greening of Anaheim depends on a reliable and clean water supply. Since the City
receives almost three-fourths of its drinking water from local groundwater, it is critical to
protect this vital resource. The groundwater recharge area, located in an area that
extends north and east of the Orange (SR-57)/Riverside (SR-91) Freeway interchange, to
the Riverside Freeway and Imperial Highway interchange, is critically important because
this area accounts for two-thirds of the total groundwater recharge that occurs in all of
Orange County.
In order to protect current and future groundwater resources, the City has established a
Groundwater Protection Zone for the recharge area (Figure G-2). The purpose of the
zone is to allow the City to develop a multi-faceted approach to protecting Anaheim’s
drinking water from contamination. The primary emphasis will be to provide educational
outreach materials to inform businesses and residents how to properly manage materials
and waste.
The City also has responsibilities to address the issues associated with storm water and
urban runoff pollution. The Clean Water Act requires cities to develop Surface Water
Quality Programs to reduce the pollution from urban runoff. Businesses and
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-13
homeowners also have certain rights and responsibilities for the proper disposal of toxic
and environmentally degrading materials such as oil, paints, solvents and litter. The City
publishes brochures for citizens to keep them informed on responsible management of
waste. In addition, a Water Quality Management Plan is required of all new development
to minimize pollutants in runoff.
Groundwater Protection
Groundwater protection is a Federal, State, county and city issue. It concerns local
drinking water quality and standards, source water protection, and hazardous materials
control. Administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Federal Safe
Drinking Water Act sets the standards which regional and local water districts
implement. The Public Utilities Department of the City of Anaheim, one of the County’s
many Community Water Systems, gets most of its supply from groundwater and
therefore, has a vital interest in its protection.
Anaheim’s Public Utilities Department regularly conducts Source Water Assessments for
all of its wells. This included an inventory of Possible Contaminating Activities (PCAs),
which are types of activities that could contaminate drinking water sources if a release
were to occur. It was determined that the recharge area has the greatest potential for
causing widespread contamination of the groundwater basin. In order to inform
businesses and residents in the recharge area of the importance of groundwater
protection, the City will develop and distribute educational materials that describe
techniques to properly manage materials and waste to prevent negative impacts to the
groundwater supply.
GOAL 6.1:
Develop a Groundwater Protection Management Program to ensure the quality of
groundwater drinking supplies.
Policies:
1)Develop and disseminate educational materials that describe the importance
of protecting groundwater and management techniques for the proper
storage and disposal of materials and waste.
2)Include groundwater protection educational outreach efforts with Anaheim
Fire Department hazardous materials and waste inspections.
3)Continue to coordinate groundwater protection efforts with the Orange
County Water District, neighboring cities and other relevant agencies.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-14 | Revised April 2018May 2004
Storm Water and Urban Runoff Management
Related to the issue of groundwater protection is the issue of minimizing the effects of
storm water and urban runoff pollution (SWURP). Not only does storm water runoff
affect local groundwater, it has the potential to impact neighboring jurisdictions and the
region. Unlike sewage, which goes to treatment plants, urban runoff flows untreated
through the storm drain system. Anything thrown, swept or poured into the street,
gutter or a catch basin (the curbside openings that lead into the storm drain system) can
flow directly into channels, creeks, bays and ocean. The problem is particularly acute
during heavy rains, but can be a problem at any time due to the improper disposal of
products associated with business, industry, restaurants, and home, garden and
automotive maintenance.
Management of storm water runoff is a federal requirement mandated by the Santa Ana
Region of the California State Water Resources Control Board. All cities in Orange
County are required to incorporate watershed protection principles into their General
Plans and related documents. As one of Orange County’s most populous cities and
bordering its largest river, the City of Anaheim plays a key role in this process.
The Clean Water Act requires permitting under the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES). The County of Orange serves as the principal permittee
while the Orange County Flood Control District and all incorporated municipalities are
co-permittees. The mandate requires the development and implementati on of 12
distinct programs, to the “Maximum Extent Practical,” which are intended to prevent and
reduce pollution from urban runoff and storm water as these sources are considered
significant contributors of pollutants to waters of the United States. This includes, but is
not limited to, illegal discharges and illicit connections to storm drains, runoff from
construction sites, restaurants, outdoor storage sites and industrial areas.
GOAL 7.1:
Reduce urban run-off from new and existing development.
Policies:
1)Ensure compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act requirements for
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, including
developing and requiring the development of Water Quality Management
Plans for all new development and significant redevelopment in the City.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-16 | Revised April 2018May 2004
This page intentionally left blank
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-17
2) Continue to implement an urban runoff reduction program consistent with
regional and federal requirements, which includes requiring and encou raging
the following:
Increase permeable areas and install filtration controls (including grass
lined swales and gravel beds) and divert flow to these permeable areas to
allow more percolation of runoff into the ground;
Use natural drainage, detention ponds or infiltration pits to collect
runoff; and,
Prevent rainfall from entering material and waste storage areas and
pollution-laden surfaces.
3) Cooperate with surrounding jurisdictions and the County of Orange to
provide adequate storm drainage facilities.
4) Require new development and significant redevelopment to utilize site
preparation, grading and best management practices that provide erosion
and sediment control to prevent construction-related contaminants from
leaving the site and polluting waterways.
5) Coordinate with appropriate Federal, State, and local resource agencies on
development projects and construction activities affecting waterways and
drainages.
6) Provide public education information and outreach materials regarding
proper materials handling practices to assist residents and businesses in
complying with surface water quality regulations and to increase awareness
of potential impacts to the environment resulting from improper containment
or disposal practices.
Air Quality
The greening of Anaheim depends on clean air. As
one of the largest cities in the State, Anaheim has an
important role to play in promoting clean air. With
resort destinations of international, national and
regional appeal, Anaheim generates many vehicle trips.
Traversed by three major freeways and dozens of
regional arterials, the City is the site of major vehicular
traffic flows. Furthermore, as a major employment
center, the City has a net in-flow of commuters.
Sources Of Air Pollution
Combustion —primarily from
automobile engines; the largest
source of air pollution
Natural sources—oil seeps,
vegetation, windblown dust
Evaporation of organic liquids—
used in coating and cleaning
processes
Abrasion – primarily between
tires and roadways
Industrial processes and
construction – windblown fumes
and particulate matter
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-18 | Revised April 2018May 2004
Since the largest single source of air pollution is from motor vehicles, efforts to control
emissions from cars and trucks would go a long way towards cleaner air. This approach
is multi-faceted: adopting clean-burning fuels; improving traffic flows; and encouraging
mass transit. Efficient land use planning can also reduce air pollution by reducing vehicle
trips. Promoting mixed use and multi-use development, providing accessible retail
centers, and improving pedestrian links to commercial and recreation areas can help
reduce dependence on automobiles.
Background – The Air Quality Management District (AQMD) is the air pollution control
agency for all of Orange County and the urban portions of Los Angeles, Riverside and
San Bernardino Counties. It prepares an Air Quality Management Plan every three years,
following its mandate from the Federal Clean Air Act.
Anaheim’s Clean Air Programs – The City has been taking proactive measures through a
series of clean air programs like The Anaheim Resort Transit Fleet. With millions of
visitors per year needing to get from place to place, the City, along with the Anaheim
Transportation Network, has purchased electric buses and trams along with propane
trolleys to move visitors to and from major tourist amenities.
Emissions Reduction
Reducing emissions is a public and private responsibility. The City of Anaheim’s Public
Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Services Division has the mission of
improving the transportation infrastructure and traffic flows. Its Intelligent
Transportation Systems inform motorists through changeable message signs directing
them to the less congested roadways and available parking. The Scoot Adaptive Traffic
Control System examines real-time traffic conditions to optimize traffic signal timing.
GOAL 8.1:
Reduce locally generated emissions through improved traffic flows and construction
management practices.
Policies:
1)Reduce vehicle emissions through traffic flow improvements, such as traffic
signal synchronization, Intelligent Transportation Systems, the Scoot
Adaptive Traffic Control System, and related capital improvements.
2)Regulate construction practices, including grading, dust suppression,
chemical management, and encourage pre-determined construction routes
that minimize dust and particulate matter pollution.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-19
Reducing Vehicle Work Trips
An important way to reduce vehicle trips is to bring different types of land uses together
in mixed-use or multi-use developments. Rather than single-use areas separating
housing from retail and office uses, the City has targeted key areas for a concentration of
different uses that bring people closer to shopping, recreation, entertainment and
employment. For example, the City is planning for such a mix of uses in The Platinum
Triangle and the Downtown. A place which provides window shopping, restaurants,
convenience retail, office development, and accessible parking all within comfortable
walking distances can keep people from using their cars.
The most land-efficient use of space is vertical mixed-use, where different uses occur on
different levels of the same building. Horizontal mixed-use development can combine
different uses within the same property or adjacent properties. Either way, the key idea
is convenience and choices for the visitor or resident. A mixed-use center cannot only
provide housing but also convenience retail, offices and recreation. Restaurant and other
service-oriented retail uses can be provided within business parks and light industrial
areas for the benefit of workers.
GOAL 9.1:
Reduce single-occupancy vehicle trips
Policies:
1) Encourage alternative work schedules for public and private sector workers.
2) Encourage development of new commercial and industrial projects that
provide on-site amenities that help to lesson vehicle trips such as on-site day
care facilities, cafeterias, automated teller machines and bicycle storage
facilities.
3) Encourage use of vanpools and carpools by providing priority parking
through the project design process.
4) Encourage bicycle and pedestrian travel by improving the City’s trail and
bikeway master plan and by providing convenient links between the trail
system and desired destinations.
5) Encourage the development of commercial, office and residential uses in
appropriate mixed-use and multiple use settings.
Expanding Transit Trips
The City of Anaheim is already well-served by public transit, but is continuing to work for
greater ridership. The Commuter Services Office, operated by the Public Works
Department, provides information to walkers, cyclists, bus and rail users, and car and
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-20 | Revised April 2018May 2004
vanpoolers. Sound land use planning complements this comprehensive approach to
public transit. The City is also encouraging mixed-use and higher density development in
the vicinity of Metrolink stops and transit corridors. In addition, carefully placed and
well-marked transit stops exist near all major tourist amenities.
GOAL 10.1:
Improve the efficiency and ridership of public transit within the City.
Policies:
1) Continue to expand the convenience and quality of local transit service.
2) Provide convenient connections and shuttle services from commuter rail
stations to employment centers and entertainment venues.
3) Work with public transit providers to ensure that transit stops are safe,
comfortable and convenient.
4) Continue multi-faceted efforts to inform the public about transit
opportunities, scheduling and benefits.
5) Provide convenient first/last mile bicycle and pedestrian connections to
transit stops.
Sound Land Use Planning
One of the challenges facing Anaheim is the development of
successful commercial retail centers in strategic areas accessible
to nearby residents and employees. This will help to reduce
traffic congestion and air pollution at the same time. The
problem has not been a lack of commercial uses; in fact, the
City has an ample supply of land designated for such uses. The
challenge is to attract quality retail centers. With the attractive shopping alternatives
located in nearby cities, many residents have used their cars to travel to other retail
destinations.
The solution does not lie in designating more land for commercial uses, but rather to
make those areas, as desired by the City, become thriving and vibrant commercial activity
areas. The primary strategies include consolidating commercial uses into strategic
locations, particularly at the intersections of arterial corridors; encouraging new
residential development along arterial corridors that bring new residents and income to
areas served by commercial locations; utilizing various economic development and
redevelopment tools and incentives; and providing carefully-tailored design guidelines
which produce the type of quality development, mix of uses and pedestrian amenities
which will attract repeat business.
Please reference the
Economic Development
Element for additional
policies regarding retail
leakage.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-21
Another strategy for reducing vehicle trips is “transit oriented development” (TOD) – the
provision of higher density, mixed-use development near major rail and transit stops.
These developments are designed to encourage easy access to transit and shopping
opportunities minimizing the need for a private car. With two Metrolink Stations,
planned Bus Rapid Transit access, among other transit alternatives, the City has ample
opportunities to incorporate transit-oriented design.
GOAL 11.1:
Encourage land planning and urban design that support alternatives to the private
automobile such as mixed-use, provision of pedestrian and bicycle amenities, and transit-
oriented development.
Policies:
1)Encourage commercial growth and the development of commercial centers
in accordance with the Land Use Element.
2)Encourage mixed-use development in accordance with the Land Use
Element.
3)Encourage retail commercial uses in or near residential areas and
employment centers to lessen vehicle trips.
4)Encourage higher densities and mixed-use development in the vicinity of
major rail and transit stops.
5)Encourage a diverse mix of retail uses within commercial centers to
encourage one-stop shopping.
6)Locate new public facilities with access to mass transit service and other
alternative transportation services, including rail, bus, bicycles and pedestrian
use.
7)Provide everyday opportunities to connect with nature through the
promotion of trails, bicycle routes, and habitat friendly landscaping.
Efficient, Clean-burning Public Transit
The City of Anaheim has taken innovative steps to encourage the use of electric and
other alternative fuel vehicles. With several major tourist destinations, the City provides
alternative fuel shuttle service for visitors. The electric transportation program has
received an award from the Air Quality Management District in the area of Innovative
Transportation Projects and, with increasing numbers of visitors to The Anaheim Resort,
will continue to contribute to air quality improvements.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-22 | Revised April 2018May 2004
GOAL 12.1:
Continue to be a county leader in the use of electric and alternative fuel vehicles.
Policies:
1)Continue and expand the program to convert City vehicle fleets to alternative
fuel and/or electric power.
2)Continue the City’s program of providing a clean fuel Resort Transit Fleet.
3)Continue to work with Anaheim businesses to assist with fleet conversion to
alternative fuels.
4)Work with the U.S. Department of Energy to achieve a Clean City
designation for the City of Anaheim.
Educating the Public
Anaheim has made great strides in educating the public about air quality, energy
conservation and public transit. Its City website has informative and easy to use links to
commuter services, and tips for saving electricity and conserving water.
This community education effort is supplemented by school outreach programs that aim
to teach students about protecting the environment and saving resources. Air quality
planning, however, is a complex, ongoing effort, subject to Federal, State and regional
laws and regulations, and one that Anaheim will continue to address in the future.
GOAL 13.1:
Expand citizen and business outreach programs relating to policies that improve air
quality.
Policies:
1)Continue to update and improve the City’s transit programs and
informational resources – both web-based and print media.
2)Disseminate air quality educational materials to residents, businesses and
schools.
Biological Resources
An important part of the Green Element includes natural open space that is home to
native plant and animal species. Although much of Anaheim is built out, significant open
space areas exist in the eastern portion of the City, like Deer Canyon and Oak Canyon,
where protecting biological resources is an important task. In addition, several major
parks of regional and statewide interest – the Chino Hills State Park and the Cleveland
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-23
National Forest, are adjacent to the City and are home to a variety of plant and animal
species.
Conservation of Biological Resources
The area generally south of the Riverside (SR-91) Freeway and east of the Orange (SR-
55) Freeway falls within one of the most innovative and significant habitat protection
plans in California – the Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP). The Orange
County Central-Coast Sub-regional NCCP was approved in July of 1996. It consists of
37,000 acres covering portions of several cities and unincorporated areas, contains
twelve habitat types and covers 39 sensitive plant and animal species.
The City will continue to support regional planning efforts to conserve biological
resources within and adjacent to the City. In addition, future development in the
easternmost portion of the City should be sensitively integrated with the adjoining habitat
areas.
GOAL 14.1:
Conserve natural habitat and protect rare, threatened and endangered species.
Policies:
1) Support efforts to preserve natural habitat through continued participation in
the Natural Communities Conservation Plan.
GOAL 14.2:
Support educational outreach programs related to habitat resources and conservation
efforts.
Policies:
1) Encourage and support regional efforts to educate the public about habitat
resources and conservation efforts.
GOAL 14.3:
Ensure that future development near regional open space resources will be sensitively
integrated into surrounding sensitive habitat areas.
Policies:
1) Require new development to mitigate light and glare impacts on surrounding
sensitive habitat and open space areas, where appropriate.
Mineral Resources
The California Geological Survey provides information about California’s non-fuel
mineral resources. The primary focus of the Mineral Resources Project is to classify
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-24 | Revised April 2018May 2004
lands throughout the State that contain regionally significant mineral resources as
mandated by State Law. According to the California Geological Survey, parts of East
Anaheim, Anaheim Canyon, and Hill and Canyon Areas are identified as being within a
Mineral Resource Zone, Class 2 (MRZ-2). Lands within this zone are determined to
have a high potential for significant mineral deposits. The City of Anaheim has three
sectors identified as containing mineral resources of regional significance. These sectors
are shown on Figure G-3, Mineral Resource Map.
Sector D – aggregate-sand and gravel deposits located between Orangethorpe
Avenue and La Palma Avenue.
Sector E – aggregate-sand and gravel deposits located at the southwest corner of the
intersection of Miraloma Avenue and North Lakeview Avenue.
Sector F – aggregate-sand and gravel deposits located in the Warner Basin near the
intersection of La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue.
The three sites listed above are developed with industrial uses; therefore, their practical
value as mineral resources is somewhat limited.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-26 | Revised April 2018May 2004
This page intentionally left blank
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-27
Energy Conservation: Green Power and Saving
Electricity
The City has made great strides in energy conservation. Since 1894, the City has
operated its own electric utility, which offers the lowest electricity rates in Orange
County. The City’s growing energy conservation programs and outreach efforts are
numerous and the City’s website offers practical advice on making homes more energy
efficient.
City facilities and some of Anaheim’s largest businesses voluntarily reduce energy
demand during peak use hours (2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.). The City maintains a 12,000-
square foot solar array on top of the Anaheim Convention Center as well as emergency
generators to maintain energy supply during interruptions in service.
Energy Conservation
As the second largest city in the County and the only one that owns its own public
utilities, Anaheim has long recognized its special role in promoting energy conservation.
The Anaheim Public Utilities Department has taken the lead in educating the public –
both residents and businesses – on efficient energy use. Energy conservation is a
comprehensive process, involving efficient use of appliances, new technologies, building
design and construction, and the City will continue to regard it as a major policy goal.
Anaheim’s energy conservation efforts are consistent with national and State programs.
The United States Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency have
long sponsored conservation efforts such as the Energy Star Program that encourages
superior energy efficiency by residents and businesses. Many jurisdictions have enrolled
in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP), which provides incentives for
builders who attain energy savings 30 percent above the National Model Energy Code.
GOAL 15.1:
Continue to lead the County in energy conservation programs, practices and community
outreach.
Policies:
1)Continue to maintain and update energy conservation programs and
information provided on the City’s website.
GOAL 15.2:
Continue to encourage site design practices that reduce and conserve energy.
Policies:
1)Encourage increased use of passive and active solar design in existing and
new development (e.g., orienting buildings to maximize exposure to cooling
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-28 | Revised April 2018May 2004
effects of prevailing winds and locating landscaping and landscape structures
to shade buildings).
2) Encourage energy-efficient retrofitting of existing buildings throughout the
City.
3) Continue to provide free energy audits for the public.
Waste Management and Recycling
On average, Americans produce over four pounds of trash per day. As available space in
and for landfills grows scarcer, cities all over the country have been mandated to manage
waste more efficiently.
Waste Management and Recycling
The City’s program – Recycle Anaheim – consists
of an automated trash collection program along
with a broader recycling and yard waste collection
system. The Public Works Department also
offers information on disposal and collection of
hazardous waste, enclosure design and additional
disposal services.
In addition, the City, in partnership with the
California Integrated Waste Management Board,
has identified Anaheim Canyon as a regional
Recycling Market Development Zone (RMDZ).
The RMDZ program diverts waste from
California landfills by stimulating recycling
businesses. The program provides assistance,
such as information and low interest loans, to
companies in Anaheim Canyon that use recycled goods to manufacture finished
products. Statewide, the program serves 70 cities and over 700,000 customers.
GOAL 16.1:
Continue to monitor and improve the Anaheim Recycle program.
Policies:
1) Continue educational outreach programs for Anaheim’s households,
businesses, and schools on the need for recycling solid waste.
2) Provide adequate solid waste collection and recycling for commercial areas
and construction activities.
The City of Anaheim has made great
strides in reducing solid waste through
its Recycle Anaheim program. In
collaboration with its private contractor,
the City provides an automated,
curbside solid waste collection and
recycling system for its residents.
Anaheim’s recycling program uses
color-coded barrels for waste disposal:
green for recyclables, brown for yard
waste and black for other trash.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-29
Green Development Practices
The City has taken a leading role in promoting environmentally friendly, energy-efficient
and sustainable development by integrating its policies related to conservation, open
space, parks and recreation and landscaping into a comprehensive Green Element. By
further establishing and implementing policies on “green building” design and
construction, the City serves as a model for incorporating
policies in the General Plan rather than applying them on
an ad-hoc project basis.
Building construction can have a significant impact on the
environment. With careful and sensitive design, new
construction can have a positive environmental effect.
The principles of “Green Building Codes,” promulgated
by the U.S. Department of Energy, include designing for:
Energy efficiency – building orientation and siting can save energy by using
renewable resources such as solar and wind power. For example, locating major
windows and building openings away from maximum sun exposure but towards
prevailing winds can significantly cool a building.
Environmental impact – site design can reduce storm water run-off and landscaping
can conserve water, improve aesthetics and cool buildings;
Resource conservation – selection of efficient building materials, installing energy -
saving products and reducing construction waste saves money;
Indoor air quality – proper ventilation standards reduce the potential for exposure to
noxious materials and improve occupants’ health; and
Community issues – mixed use development and other development where buildings
are sited near transit stops, public facilities, shopping and residences reduce reliance
on automobiles; the provision of comfortable pedestrian amenities and bicycle
storage facilities promote alternatives to the car.
Building Performance Standards
Green building practices and standards are a relatively recent phenomenon, but are
becoming widespread nationally. Concerns over the unpredictability of energy prices and
supplies have given the movement even more impetus. Energy efficient buildings not
only save users on utility bills, but also satisfy several community goals at once – air
quality, water conservation, urban runoff, and solid waste reduction.
“Green buildings” are
environmentally-sound and
resource efficient. They promote
use of renewable energy - solar
and wind - and reduce waste.
Through careful design, green
buildings reduce energy costs
and fit sensitively into the
community’s infrastructure.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-30 | Revised April 2018May 2004
GOAL 17.1:
Encourage building and site design standards that reduce energy costs.
Policies:
1) Encourage designs that incorporate solar and wind exposure features such as
daylighting design, natural ventilation, space planning and thermal massing.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-31
Enhancing Parks and
Recreation Programs
he City of Anaheim provides a wide variety of parks and recreation facilities.
Although State law does not require a Parks and Recreation Element, Anaheim
recognizes the importance of including such an element in its General Plan.
The Vision
The City owns and operates nearly 50 63 parks and special use facilities totaling almost
700 689.2 acres and two 18-hole golf courses. Park facilities include neighborhood,
communitylocal and special use parks. Local
parks include pocket, neighborhood, and
community parks while special use parks include
mini parks, nature centers, recreation centers
and other special use facilities. Regional parks,
owned and operated by the County of Orange,
provide other prominent park opportunities in
and adjacent to Anaheim.
Despite this vast system of parks and
recreational facilities, additional needs for new
facilities are evident and are discussed below.
Areas for enhancement include:
Providing more neighborhood and
community parks throughout Anaheim;
Providing more community centers and cultural facilities, especially for teens and
seniors; and,
Providing more lighted and practice athletic fields and indoor recreational
facilities, such as gymnasiums, in all areas of the City to meet current and future
needs.
T
Originally named City Park, Pearson Park in
the Anaheim Colony Historic District
provides a wide range of passive and active
recreational opportunities and is home to the
Pearson Park Amphitheater.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-32 | Revised April 2018May 2004
PARK TYPES
Parks come in all shapes and sizes, from small pocket parks to large regional parks.
Below is a description of the types of parks found in the City.
Local Parks – Pocket, Neighborhood, and
Community Parks
Pocket Parks
This is a “walk to“ park facility of less than one acre generally serving the immediate area
surrounding the park. It has no restroom or parking. Pocket parks generally provide
passive recreational uses such as picnic facilities, landscaping, and public art, however
active uses such as a children’s play area, court sports, or other
amenities can be planned through public participation. There are no
programmed activities in this type of park facility.
Neighborhood Parks
This is a “walk to” park facility of 5 to 14 acres with a park service radius
of one-half mile generally serving residents within walking distance. Off -
street parking areas are generally provided for a limited number of
vehicles. Amenities at neighborhood parks are usually determined
through a public participation process which can result in a large variety
of facilities including family picnic or barbeque areas, children’s play
areas, paved hard-court areas, one or more unlighted athletic fields, and
restrooms. Neighborhood parks are often located next to elementary or
middle schools to maximize open space for the community through
shared joint-use agreements with local school districts.
This is the most common type of park in Anaheim. These are parks to
which people walk or bike and are located within the neighborhood they
serve. They are typically 5 to 15 acres in size and have a service radius
of one-half mile. Neighborhood parks are located on separate properties
and provide amenities determined through public participation, often
including picnic areas, unlighted athletic fields, tot lots, court games,
passive green space, restrooms, recreation and neighborhood center
buildings and off-street parking. If possible, these are located adjacent to elementary or
middle schools to facilitate joint-use with local school districts.
Community Parks
This is a “walk to“ or “drive to” park facility. It is an activity oriented park
facility of 15 to 50 acres in size. It is a programmed facility designed to
serve the recreation needs of neighborhoods and broader areas of the
City. It has a service radius of up to two miles. Amenities are determined
Stoddard Park, one of the several
Neighborhood Parks located in Central
Anaheim, includes sports fields for
soccer and softball, children’s play areas,
picnic facilities and a recreation center
Long before the Angels moved to
Anaheim from Los Angeles, La Palma
Park was home to the first professional
baseball team in Anaheim. Today, it
provides a multitude of recreational uses
for Anaheim residents and nearby
employees.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-33
largely through public participation and can include those of the neighborhood park type,
but on a larger basis, and may contain multiple lighted athletic fields, large community
centers or recreation buildings, and other major recreation amenities. Community parks
are often located next to middle or high-school facilities to maximize open space for the
community through shared joint-use agreements with local school districts.These parks
serve several neighborhoods and have a service radius of up to 2 miles, which is about
the same service radius as a high school. Their size ranges from 15 to 50 acres,
providing similar and larger amenities than a neighborhood park including lighted ball
fields, basketball courts, tennis courts, and community centers or large recreation
buildings. Due to their larger size, community parks are designed for vehicular as well as
pedestrian access. When possible, these parks are also located adjacent to middle or
high schools to facilitate joint-use of the athletic facilities at the schools.
Special Use Parks and Facilities
Mini-Parks
This is a “walk to“ park facility of less than 5 acres in size
with a service radius up to a quarter-mile from the park.
Amenities depend on the size of the park and usually do not
have restrooms or parking amenities. Passive uses are
typically implemented, however active uses can be included
dependent on the size of the park. Often called pocket
parks, these are the smallest type of park and are usually less
than five acres in size. They often consist of passive
recreational uses (although basketball, children’s play areas and other active uses can be
included), provide little to no parking and serve a relatively small area. George
Washington Park, Walnut Grove Park, Cottonwood Park, Little People’s Park and Juliana
Park are examples of this type of park.
Nature Centers Park or Specialized Recreation Centers
This is a passive oriented recreational facility. Each facility is different but will likely have
an off-street parking area, restrooms, open space, trails and native landscaping. An
interpretive center or signage may also be amenities provided at nature parks to highlight
the importance of natural resources in Anaheim.These facilities serve a specialized,
Citywide need and tend to focus on one particular activity, such as a nature center or
natural area, or tennis or golf complex.
Recreation Center
This type of facility includes one or more standalone recreation buildings serving a broad
spectrum of the community. These are programmed buildings or facilities that can
include senior citizen centers, youth activity facilities, gymnasiums, classrooms and
community serving programs. These buildings are 10,000 square feet or greater in size
George Washington Park provides
nearby Colony residents with a park
facility that reflects the historic
character of the area.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-34 | Revised April 2018May 2004
and will have large, off street parking to accommodate the many program participants.
There is no identified service radius for this type of facility.
Special Use Facility
Special use facilities are associated with singular or special uses not occurring with other
facility types. This could include community gardens, cultural or historic facilities, skate
parks, swimming pool or sports complexes serving the entire city. These facilities can be
standalone or incorporated with other recreational uses. Parking and other amenities are
provided as necessary.
Regional Parks
Regional parks are typically 50 acres or larger and have a wide range of amenities to
attract a broad range of users and interests within and beyond the City limits. For such
large-scale parks, service radii and standards can vary but they generally serve a
population of between 50,000 to 100,000 people up to 30 miles away. There are a
number of regional park facilities, operated by the County of Orange, located in,
adjacent to, or near Anaheim. These facilities include:
Yorba Regional Park – 166 acres in the eastern portion of Anaheim along the north
side of the Santa Ana River
Featherly Regional Park – 150 acres outside of the City limits north of the Riverside
(SR-91) Freeway with camping, amphitheatre and nature trails
Weir Canyon Regional Park – proposed park encompassing 2,100 acres near the
proposed southerly extension of Weir Canyon Road in the City of Orange’s sphere -
of-influence
Santiago Oaks Regional Park – 135 acres along Santiago Creek in the City of
Orange
Regional Trails – nearly 30 miles of hiking, biking and equestrian trails, the longest of
which is the over 10 mile-long Santa Ana River Trail; the majority of the other trails
are located in the hilly areas in eastern Anaheim.
State-Owned Open Space
The State has acquired approximately 4,000 acres as an addition to the Chino Hills State
Park. The area is known for its Tecate Cypress forest, of which the trees are one of the
last remaining stands in the world. It also has an important wildlife connection which
enables wildlife to traverse from the south side of the SR-91 Freeway into Chino Hills
State Park.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018May 2004 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-35
PARK PLANNING AREAS
Planning parks for a city of Anaheim’s size and diversity is a challenge. For planning
purposes, the City has traditionally been divided into three Park, Recreation and
Community Service Areas (PRCS): West Anaheim, located west of Euclid Street; Central
Anaheim, situated east of Euclid Street and west of the Santa Ana River; and East
Anaheim, located east of the Santa Ana River (see Figure G-4, Existing Park Facilities).
The criteria used to determine these planning areas include: geographic barriers, land
use patterns, census areas, and high school attendance boundaries.West Anaheim is
comprised of Districts 1 and 2, Central Anaheim is comprised of Districts 3 and 4, and
East Anaheim is comprised of Districts 5 and 6.
Anaheim’s Existing Facilities
As shown in Figure G-4, Anaheim currently owns or operates a wide variety of parks and
recreation facilities, totaling approximately 700689.2 acres. These include:
Local Parks
9 Pocket Parks
23 Neighborhood parks
9 Community Parks
Special Use Parks and Facilities
6 Nature Parks
3 Recreation Centers
•10 Mini-Parks
3 Special Use Facilities
24 neighborhood parks
11 community parks
8 mini-parks
5 nature centers
3 specialized recreation centers
These parks feature passive uses such as picnic tables,
barbecue facilities, and tot lots as well as active uses such
as ball fields and tennis courts.
East Anaheim
Much of East Anaheim’s parks are located in passive
parklands. Two nature-oriented park areas, Oak Canyon
Nature Center and the Deer Canyon Park Preserve (58 and
130 acres respectively), account for a significant portion of
the parkland in East Anaheim. The area also contains
several lighted soccer/football fields and softball fields and
The Deer Canyon Park Preserve
provides a valuable scenic wildlife
and passive recreational resource
for East Anaheim residents.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-36 | Revised April 2018May 2004
the Anaheim Hills Golf Course.
West Anaheim
Most of this area’s parks adjoin existing elementary schools. They
contain active community uses such as soccer fields, softball fields and
tot lots. Two of the largest active recreational parks in Anaheim,
Brookhurst Park and Twila Reid Park, are found here. West Anaheim is
also home to one of the two Anaheim skateboard parks and the Dad
Miller Golf Course.
Central Anaheim
This part of Anaheim has more parks than any other, partly because it is
the oldest and most intensely developed part of the City. The three
oldest parks in the City, Pearson, La Palma and Boysen, are found here.
Several of the parks in this area reflect the historic character and
traditions of the Anaheim Colony, the historic heart of Anaheim.
The Dad Miller Golf Course was
named for H.G. "Dad" Miller who
was a pioneer for golf in Anaheim.
Located adjacent to the historic
Anaheim Train Station, Citrus Park
provides volleyball and basketball
courts, barbeques and a children’s
play area.
")
#*
")#*
#*
!(#*
#*
!(
!(
")
")
")
!(
!(!(
#*
!(
#*
")
#*
#*
")
#*
#*
#*
")
!(
!(#*
#*
#*
!(
!(
")
#*
#*
!(
#*
#*
!(!(
!(
#*
!(
")
#*
!(
#*
#*
")#*
!(
Ho
l
d
e
r
S
t
Kn
o
t
t
A
v
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
Be
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
Da
l
e
S
t
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
A
v
e
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
S
t
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
Mu
l
l
e
r
S
t
La Palma Ave
Crescent Ave
Lincoln Ave
Broadway
Orange Ave
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Chapman Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Nu
t
w
o
o
d
S
t
9t
h
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Le
w
i
s
S
t
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
Do
u
g
l
a
s
s
R
d
S
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
Disney Way
Gene Autry Way
W
e
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
O
l
i
v
e
S
t
E
a
s
t
S
tS o u t h S t
V e r m o n t A v e
S a n t a A n a S tBroadwayLincolnAve
S y c a m o r e S tNorthSt
Ball Rd
Wagner Ave
South St
La Palma Ave
Romneya Dr
Orangethorpe Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Le
m
o
n
S
t
Ra
y
m
o
n
d
A
v
e
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Ac
a
c
i
a
A
v
e
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
P l a c e n t i a A v e
Su
n
k
i
s
t
S
t
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
S
t
Crowther Ave
O r a n g e t h o r p e A v e
M i r a l o m a A v e
L a P a l m a A v e
R
e
d
G
u
m
S
t
K
r
a
e
m
e
r
B
l
v
d
M
ill
e
r
S
t
T
ustinA
ve
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
L
a
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
Ke
l
l
o
g
g
D
r
Esperan z a R dOrangethorpeAve
La Palma Ave
ImperialHwy
S a n ti
a g o B l
M e a t s A v e
Im p e r i a l H w y
NohlRanch R d
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
Fairm
ontBlvd
C a n y on RimRd S e r
r a n o A v e
W
eir
C
a
n
yonRd
O a k C a nyon D r
M
e
t
r
o
li
n
k
|ÿ241
|ÿ91|ÿ90
|ÿ55|ÿ57
|ÿ91
§¨¦5
B
l
u
e
G
u
m
S
t
Cerritos A v e
1
2
34
66
8
910
11
13
15
16 1820
22
23
12
2
4
56
8 910
11
12
15 16
17
18
13
1
2
3
5
7
8 14
9
17
10
11
21
4
19
1 24
5
7
3
Lo
a
r
a
S
t
Romneya Dr A
n
a
h
e
i
m
H
ills
R
d
7
14
Existing Park Facilities
City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
Figure G-4 Page G-35
Central Anaheim Park Facilities 1. Downtown Community Center (Acres N/A) 2. Boysen (24.6 Acres) 3. Citrus (2.4 Acres) 4. Colony (0.2 Acres) 5. Cottonwood (1.0 Acres) 6. Edison (7.5 Acres) 7. Energy Field (3.0 Acres) 8. Juarez (9.5 Acres) 9. Julianna (1.5 Acres)10. La Palma (21.0 Acres)11. Lincoln (5.1 Acres)12. Little Peoples (1.5 Acres)13. Manzanita (7.5 Acres)14. Palm Lane (7.0 Acres)15. Pearson (19.0 Acres)16. Pioneer (15.3 Acres)17. Ponderosa (9.0 Acres)18. Rio Vista (12.8 Acres)19. Ross Park (5.5 Acres)20. Sage (8.6 Acres)21. Stoddard (9.4 Acres)22. Walnut Grove (3.0 Acres)23. George Washington (3.0 Acres)24. Willow (8.8 Acres)
East Anaheim Park Facilities 1. Anaheim Wetlands (5.0 Acres) 2. Canyon Rim (5.5 Acres) 3. Deer Canyon (130.0 Acres) 4. Eucalyptus (10.0 Acres) 5. Fairmont (7.5 Acres) 6. Imperial (7.5 Acres) 7. Nohl Ranch (4.5 Acres) 8. Oak (4.0 Acres) 9. Oak Canyon Nature Center (58.0 Acres)10. Olive Hills (10.7 Acres)11. Pelanconi (27.0 Acres)12. Peralta (21.4 Acres)13. Riverdale (8.5 Acres)14. Roosevelt (2.3 Acres)15. Sycamore (8.0 Acres)16. Toyon (16.0 Acres)17. Walnut Canyon (3.0 Acres)18. Yorba Ballfields (16.0 Acres)
West Anaheim Area Park Facilities 1. Barton (4.8 Acres) 2. Brookhurst (27.0 Acres) 3. Chaparral (10.0 Acres) 4. Delphi (3.0 Acres) 5. Hansen (7.0 Acres) 6. John Marshall (16.0 Acres) 7. Maxwell (23.2 Acres) 8. Modjeska (23.5 Acres) 9. Peter Marshall (5.0 Acres)10. Reid (27.2 Acres)11. Schweitzer (11.5 Acres)
Special Use Park(
Neighborhood Park*
Community Park)
City Boundary
0 1 20.5 Miles
Sphere-of-Influence
Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: March 8, 2016
Existing
Ho
l
d
e
r
S
t
Kn
o
t
t
A
v
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
Be
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
Da
l
e
S
t
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
A
v
e
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
S
t
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
Mu
l
l
e
r
S
t
La Palma Ave
Crescent Ave
Lincoln Ave
Broadway
Orange Ave
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Chapman Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Nu
t
w
o
o
d
S
t
9t
h
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Le
w
i
s
S
t
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
Do
u
g
l
a
s
s
R
d
S
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
Disney Way
Gene Autry Way
W
e
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
O
l
i
v
e
S
t
E
a
s
t
S
tS o u t h S t
V e r m o n t A v e
S a n t a A n a S tBroadwayLincolnAve
S y c a m o r e S tNorthSt
Ball Rd
Wagner Ave
South St
La Palma Ave
Romneya Dr
Orangethorpe Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Le
m
o
n
S
t
Ra
y
m
o
n
d
A
v
e
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Ac
a
c
i
a
A
v
e
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
P l a c e n t i a A v e
Su
n
k
i
s
t
S
t
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
S
t
Crowther Ave
O r a n g e t h o r p e A v e
M i r a l o m a A v e
L a P a l m a A v e
R
e
d
G
u
m
S
t
K
r
a
e
m
e
r
B
l
v
d
M
ill
e
r
S
t
T
ustinA
ve
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
L
a
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
Ke
l
l
o
g
g
D
r
Esperan z a R dOrangethorpeAve
La Palma Ave
ImperialHwy
S a n ti
a g o B l
M e a t s A v e
I m p e r i a l H w y
NohlRanch R d
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
Fairm
ontBlvd
C a n y o n RimRd S e r
r a n o A v e
W
eir
C
a
n
yonRd
O a k C a nyon D r
M
e
t
r
o
l
i
n
k
|ÿ241
|ÿ91|ÿ90
|ÿ55|ÿ57
|ÿ91
§¨¦5
B
l
u
e
G
u
m
S
t
Cerritos A v e
Lo
a
r
a
S
t
Romneya Dr A
n
a
h
e
i
m
H
ills
R
d
9
35
31
3
19
25
20
22
4
2 21
23713
12
22
18
16
19
114
10
16
10
12
32
8
11
15
2120
2
1
1
8
9
17
24
11
23
7
17
27
5
13
18
1
6
3
2
28
5
6
26
7
10
12
14
4
6
8 9
13
14
15
29
30
Existing Park Facilities
City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
Figure G-4 Page G-35
Central Anaheim Park Facilities 1. Anaheim Downtown Community Center and Gymnasium 2. Boysen 3. Citrus 4. Colony 5. Colony Square 6. Cottonwood 7. Energy Field 8. Founders' Park 9. Friendship Plaza 10. Julianna 11. La Palma 12. Little People's 13. Manzanita 14. Palm Lane 15. Paul Revere 16. Pearson 17. Ponderosa 18. Ross 19. Sage 20. Stoddard 21. Walnut Grove 22. George Washington 23. Willow
East Anaheim Park Facilities 1. East Anaheim Community Center and Gymnasium 2. Anaheim Hills Elementary School 3. Anaheim Coves 4. Anaheim Wetlands 5. Canyon Rim 6. Coral Tree 7. Deer Canyon 8. Edison 9. Eucalyptus 10. Imperial 11. Juarez 12. Lincoln 13. Magnolia 14. Miraloma 15. Oak Park 16. Oak Canyon Nature Center
West Anaheim Area Park Facilities 1. West Anaheim Youth Center 2. Barton 3. Brookhurst 4. Chaparral 5. Circle 6. Hansen 7. John Marshall 8. Maxwell 9. Modjeska 10. Peter Marshall 11. Schweitzer 12. Twila Reid 13. Delphi
City Boundary
0 1 20.5 Miles
Sphere-of-Influence
Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: April 16, 2016
17. Olive Hills 18. Pelanconi 19. Peralta Canyon 20. Pioneer 21. Rio Vista 22. Riverdale 23. Ronald Reagan 24. Roosevelt 25. Sycamore 26. Walnut Canyon Reservoir 27. Yorba 28. Chino Hills State Park 29. Weir Canyon Regional Park 30. Yorba Regional Park 31. Fairmont Park 32. Nohl Ranch Park
Note: See Table G-1 for park facility informationincluding facilty type and acreage,
Proposed
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-38 | Revised April 2018May 2004
This page intentionally left blank
GREEN ELEMENT
City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-39
TABLE G-1: EXISTING PARK ACREAGES AND FACILITIES
Acres
Type
of
Park
Sports Facilities RECREATION FACILITIES Additional Park & Recreation Facilities
Soccer/
Football Baseball
Formal
Softball Basketball Volleyball Handball Tennis Skateboard Shuffleboard Horseshoe
Children's
Play Area
Exercise
Course
Swimming
Pool
Picnic
Facilities
Fire
Ring Concession
Amphitheater/
Stadium
Rec. Bldg./
Community Center*** Hiking Adjacent Schools
WEST ANAHEIM
1 Barton 4.8 N 1 1 1 Barton Elementary School
2 Brookhurst 27.0 C 2 (1L) 1L 2L 1 Y 1 T 1 CC/Senior Gauer ES/Brookhurst JHS
3 Chaparral 10.0 N 1 1 2L 1 T Y RC
4 Delphi 3.0 S 2 1
5 Hansen 7.0 N 1 1 1 T Y Hansen Elementary School
6 John Marshall 16.0 C 2 2 1 1 1 T,S RC John Marshall Elementary School
7 Maxwell 23.2 C 2 (1L) 3 (2L) 1 1 T 1 SC (Therapeutic) Maxwell Elementary School
8 Modjeska 23.5 C 2 (1L) 1L 1L 1 1 T,S Y 1 RC Francis Scott Key Elementary School
9 Peter Marshall 5.0 N 1 1 1 T Peter Marshall Elementary School
10 Twila Reid 27.2 C 1L 1L 2 3 4 1 Disc Golf T,S RC Twila Reid Elementary School
11 Schweitzer 11.5 N 1 1 1 1 1 T 1 Schweitzer Elementary School
Subtotal 158.2
CENTRAL ANAHEIM
1
Downtown Community
Center N/A N/A CC
2 Boysen 24.6 C 3(1)L 1L 2 (1L) 2 2 T 1 RC Roosevelt Elementary School
3 Citrus 2.4 M 1 1 T,S
4 Colony 0.2 M T
5 Cottonwood 1.0 M 1 T
6 Edison 7.5 N 1 1 1 T RC Edison Elementary School
7 Energy Field 3.0 N 2 (P) 2T, 2S (P)
8 Juarez 9.5 N 1 1 1 T 1 RC Juarez Elementary School
9 Julianna 1.5 M 1 1 1 1 T,S
10 La Palma 21.0 C 1L 1L 1 T,S 2 Stadium NC
11 Lincoln 5.1 N 1 1 1 T Lincoln Elementary School
12 Little Peoples 1.5 M 1 1 T,S
13 Manzanita 7.5 N 1 1 1 2 T,S NC
14 Palm Lane 7.0 N 1 1 1 T Palm Lane Elementary/Ball JHS
15 Pearson 19.0 C 1L 1L 2 6L 1 1 T,2S Amphitheater NC
16 Pioneer 15.3 C 1 1 2 T,S RC Sunkist Elementary School
17 Platinum Triangle Park 7.1 N(U) 1L
18 Ponderosa 9.0 N 1L 1L 1 1 3 2 T NC
19 Rio Vista 12.8 N 1 1 2 T 1 RC Rio Vista Elementary School
20 Ross 5.5 N 1L 1L 2L 1 T,S Ross Elementary School
21 Sage 8.6 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 T 1 RC
22 Stoddard 9.4 N 1 1 2 T RC Stoddard Elementary School
23 Walnut Grove 3.0 M 2 1 1 T,S
24 George Washington 3.0 M 2
25 Willow 8.8 N 1 1 1 1 T
Subtotal 193.3
EAST ANAHEIM
1 Anaheim Wetlands 5.0 S Y
2 Canyon Rim 5.5 N 1 1 1 1 1 T,S RC Canyon Rim Elementary School
3 Deer Canyon Park Preserve 130.0 S T Y
4 Eucalyptus 10.0 N 1 1 1L 1 T,S RC
5 Fairmont 7.5 N(U)
6 Imperial 7.5 N 1 T,S Imperial Elementary School
7 Nohl Ranch 4.5 S(U)
8 Oak 4.0 S T
9 Oak Canyon 58.0 S 1 SC (Interpretive) Y
10 Olive Hills 10.7 S 6 Nohl Ranch Elementary School
11 Pelanconi 27.0 S T Y
12 Peralta 21.4 C 2L 3L 1L 1L 1 T,2S 1 RC/NC Crescent Primary/Intermediate School
13 Riverdale 8.5 N 1 1 1 1 T,S
14 Roosevelt Park 2.3 M
15 Sycamore 8.0 N 1 1 1L 1L 1 T,2S RC
16 Toyon 16.0 C 2L 2L 1L 1 1 T,2S RC
17 Walnut Canyon 3.0 S(U)
18 Yorba Ballfields 16.0 S 3L 3L 1 T 1
Subtotal 344.9
GRAND TOTAL 696.4
Facilities: Park Types: Recreation Buildings/Community Centers:
L - Lighted S - Picnic Shelter T - Picnic Table M - Mini Park C - Community Park U - Undeveloped Park CC - Community Center (larger than 10,000 square feet) SC - Special Use Center
Y- Yes (P) - Proposed N - Neighborhood Park S – Specialized Use/Recreation/Nature Centers NC - Neighborhood Center (smaller than 10,000 square feet) RC - Recreation Center
* Does not include City operated, used and/or programmed facilities at schools.** Total does not include Canyon Rim Park site and Toyon Park site.
*** Does not include stand-alone community centers, which include the Downtown Community Center, the West Anaheim Youth Center (proposed) and the East Anaheim Community Center.
Redlined Table G-1
1 of 3
Table G-1: Existing Park Acreages and Facilities
Soccer/
Football
Soccer/
Football (New)Baseball Baseball (New)Formal Softball Softball (New)Basketball
Outdoor
Basketball
(New)
Volleyball Volleyball
(New)Handball Pickleball
(New)Tennis Tennis (New)Skateboard Skate Facility
(New)
WEST ANAHEIM (DISTRICT 1 & 2)District
1 West Anaheim Youth Center 1 2.9 RC Yes
1 2 Barton Barton 2 4.8 4.6 N N Yes 1 1*1 1
2 3 Brookhurst Brookhurst 1 27.0 26.6 C C Yes 2 (1L)2 (1L)*1L 1L 2L 2L 1 1 Y 1
3 4 Chaparral Chaparral 2 10.0 9.7 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 2L 2
5 Circle 2 0.2 P Yes
5 6 Hansen Hansen 1 7.0 3.5 N M Yes 1 1
6 7 John Marshall John Marshall 2 16.0 13.9 C N Yes 2 2*2 2(1L)1 1 1
7 8 Maxwell Maxwell 1 23.2 24.5 C C Yes 2 (1L)2L*3 (2L)3 (2L)
8 9 Modjeska Modjeska 2 23.5 21.8 C C Yes 2 (1L)2 (1L)*1L 1L 1L 1L 1 1
9 10 Peter Marshall Peter Marshall 1 5.0 4.8 N M Yes 1 1
11 11 Schweitzer Schweitzer 1 11.5 8.5 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 1 1 1 1
10 12 Twila Reid Twila Reid 1 27.2 23.9 C C Yes 1L 2L*1L 1L 2 3
4 13 Delphi Delphi 1 3.0 3.9 S SU No 2 2L
Subtotal 158.2 148.8
CENTRAL ANAHEIM (DISTRICTS 3 & 4)
1 1 Downtown Community Center Anaheim Downtown Community Center and Gymnasium 3 N/A 2.7 N/A RC Yes 1
2 2 Boysen Boysen 4 24.6 24.7 C C Yes 3(1)L 2(1)L*1L 3L 2 (1L)2L 2 2 14L
3 3 Citrus Citrus 3 2.4 1.8 M M Yes 1 1 1
4 Colony 3 0.9 P Yes
4 5 Colony Colony Square 3 0.2 0.2 M P Yes
5 6 Cottonwood Cottonwood 4 1.0 0.4 M P Yes
6 Edison Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 7.5 N 1 1
7 7 Energy Field Energy Field 4 3.0 3.0 N M Yes
8 Founders' Park 3 1.1 M Yes
9 Friendship Plaza 3 0.7 P Yes
8 Juarez Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 9.5 N 1 1
9 10 Julianna Julianna 3 1.5 0.6 M P Yes 1 1 1 1
10 11 La Palma La Palma 3 21.0 16.3 C C Yes 1L 1L*1L 1L
11 Lincoln Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 5.1 N 1 1
12 12 Little Peoples Little People's 3 1.5 1.1 M M Yes 1 1
13 13 Manzanita Manzanita 3 7.5 6.3 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 1 1
14 14 Palm Lane Palm Lane 4 7.0 6.2 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 1
15 Paul Revere 4 0.5 P Yes 1
15 16 Pearson Pearson 3 19.0 18.9 C C Yes 1L 1L*1L 1L 2 2 6L 6L
16 Pioneer Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 15.3 C 1 1
17 Platinum Triangle Park 7.1 N(U)1L
18 17 Ponderosa Ponderosa 4 9.0 9.1 N N Yes 1L 1L*1L 1L 1 1 3 1
19 Rio Vista Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 12.8 N 1 1
20 18 Ross Ross 3 5.5 5.1 N N Yes 1L 1L*1L 1L 2L 2
21 19 Sage Sage 3 8.6 7.9 N N Yes 1 1* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
22 20 Stoddard Stoddard 4 9.4 9.8 N N Yes 1 1*1 1
23 21 Walnut Grove Walnut Grove 4 3.0 2.9 M M Yes 2 1 1 1
24 22 George Washington George Washington 3 3.0 1.7 M M Yes
25 23 Willow Willow 3 8.8 8.7 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 1 1
Subtotal 193.3 130.6
EAST ANAHEIM (DISTRICTS 5 & 6)
1 East Anaheim Community Center and Gymnasium 6 6.1 RC Yes
2 Anaheim Hills Elementary School 6 3.0 SU No 2L
3 Anaheim Coves 5 23.0 NAT (UC)Yes
1 4 Anaheim Wetlands Anaheim Wetlands 6 5.0 7.6 S NAT Yes
2 5 Canyon Rim Canyon Rim 6 5.5 9.0 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 1 1 1 1
6 Coral Tree 5 0.4 P No
3 7 Deer Canyon Park Preserve Deer Canyon 6 130.0 133.5 S NAT Yes
8 Edison Edison 5 7.5 7.4 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 2
4 9 Eucalyptus Eucalyptus 6 10.0 10.0 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 1L 1
5 Fairmont 7.5 N(U)
6 10 Imperial Imperial 6 7.5 8.2 N N Yes
7 Nohl Ranch 4.5 S(U)
11 Juarez Juarez 5 9.5 8.8 N N Yes 1 1*1 1
12 Lincoln Lincoln 5 5.1 3.9 N N Yes 1 1*1 1
13 Magnolia 5 0.8 P No
14 Miraloma 5 1.3 M Yes 1
8 15 Oak Oak Park 6 4.0 3.5 S NAT Yes
9 16 Oak Canyon Oak Canyon Nature Center 6 58.0 60.9 S NAT Yes
10 17 Olive Hills Olive Hills 6 10.7 10.5 S N Yes 6 6
11 18 Pelanconi Pelanconi 6 27.0 17.7 S NAT Yes
12 19 Peralta Peralta Canyon 6 21.4 19.3 C C Yes 2L 2L*3L 3L 1L 1 1L 1
20 Pioneer Pioneer 5 15.3 13.6 C N Yes 1 1*1 1
21 Rio Vista Rio Vista 5 12.8 9.6 N N Yes 1 1*1 3
13 22 Riverdale Riverdale 6 8.5 8.0 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 1 1
16 23 Ronald Reagan 6 16.0 15.8 C C Yes 2L 2L*2L 2L 1L 1 1 1
14 24 Roosevelt Park Roosevelt 6 2.3 1.8 M M Yes
15 25 Sycamore Sycamore 6 8.0 10.0 N N Yes 1 1*1 1 1L 1 1L 1L
16 Toyon Changed to Ronald Regan Park 16.0 C 2L 2L 1L 1
17 26 Walnut Canyon Walnut Canyon Reservoir 6 3.0 3.1 S(U)SU Yes
18 27 Yorba Ballfields Yorba 6 16.0 13.0 S N Yes 3L 3L*3L 3L
28 Chino Hills State Park 650.0 STA No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
29 Weir Canyon Regional Park 210.7 REG No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
30 Yorba Regional Park 125.4 REG No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
5 31 Fairmont Park 7.5 7.5 N(U)N(U)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
7 32 Nohl Ranch Park 4.5 4.5 S(U)SU(U)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Subtotal 344.9 1407.8
GRAND TOTAL 696.4 1687.2
[(New) Indicates newly updated information]Park Types:
[Green highlights indicate additional facilities or new data from last related general plan update.]M - Mini-Park C - Community ParkU - Undeveloped Park U - Undeveloped Park
[Yellow highlights indicate name changes and other minor changes from last related general plan update.]N - Neighborhood Park S - Specialized Use / Recreation / Nature Centers
[Red highlights indicate decreases in facilities since last general plan update.]Local Parks: P- Pocket Park N - Neighborhood Park C - Community Park
[Red strickouts indicate removal from or relocation in Table G-1]Special Use Parks and Facilities: M - Mini-Park NAT - Nature Park RC - Recreation Center SU - Special Use Facility
Other Parks: REG - Regional Park STA - State-Owned Space UC - Under Construction U - Undeveloped Park
* Does not include City operated, used and/or programmed facilities at schools.
** Total does not include Canyon Rim Park site and Toyon Park site.
*** Does not include stand-alone community centers, which include the Downtown Community Center, the West Anaheim Youth Center (proposed) and the East Anaheim Community Center.
Acres (New)Type of Park Type of Park
(New)
Maintained By
City (New)
Sports Facilities
WEST ANAHEIM
CENTRAL ANAHEIM
EAST ANAHEIM
Acres
Redlined Table G-1
2 of 3
RECREATION FACILITIES Additional Park & Recreation Facilities
Shuffleboard Disc Golf (New)Horseshoe Horseshoe (New)Swimming Pool Swimming Pool
(New)
Children's Play
Area
Children's Play
Area (New)Exercise Course Fitness Zones
(New)
Splash Pads
(New)Picnic Facilities Picnic Tables
(New)
Picnic Shelters
(New)Hiking Multi Use Trail
Head (New)BBQ (New)Fire Ring Fire Ring (New)Dog Park
(New)
Restrooms
(New)Concession Concession
(New)
Amphitheater /
Stadium
Amphitheater
(New)Stadium (New)
WEST ANAHEIM (DISTRICT 1 & 2)
West Anaheim Youth Center 1
Barton 1 Y
Brookhurst 1 1 T Y Y 4 1 1
Chaparral 1 1 T Y Y Y 1 1
Circle 1 Y Y
Hansen 1 1 T Y Y Y
John Marshall 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y 1
Maxwell 1 1 1 1 T Y Y Y 2 1 1
Modjeska 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y Y 1 1 1
Peter Marshall 1 1 T Y Y
Schweitzer 1 1 T Y Y 1 1 1
Twila Reid 3 1 4 4 1 1 Disc Golf T,S Y 1 Y 2
Delphi 1 1 1
CENTRAL ANAHEIM (DISTRICTS 3 & 4)
Anaheim Downtown Community Center and Gymnasium 1 2
Boysen 2 2 T Y Y 3 1 1
Citrus 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y
Colony 1 Y 1
Colony Square T
Cottonwood 1 1 T Y
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 1 T
Energy Field 2 (P)1 2T, 2S (P) Y 2 Y 1
Founders' Park 1 1
Friendship Plaza
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 1 T 1
Julianna 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y
La Palma 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y 1 4 2 2 Stadium 2
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 1 T
Little People's 1 1 T,S Y 1
Manzanita 2 2 T,S Y 1 Y 1
Palm Lane 1 1 T Y
Paul Revere 1 1 Y Y
Pearson 1 1 1 1 T,2S Y 2 Y 2 1 Amphitheater 1 1
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 2 T,S
Ponderosa 2 1 1 1 T Y Y 2
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 2 T 1
Ross 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y 1
Sage 1 1 T Y Y 1 1 1
Stoddard 2 1 T Y Y 1
Walnut Grove 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y 1
George Washington 2 2 Y 1
Willow 1 1 T Y Y 1
EAST ANAHEIM (DISTRICTS 5 & 6)
East Anaheim Community Center and Gymnasium 2
Anaheim Hills Elementary School Y 1 1
Anaheim Coves 1 1 Y 2
Anaheim Wetlands Y Y
Canyon Rim 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y 1
Coral Tree 1 Y 1 Y
Deer Canyon T Y Y Y 1
Edison 1 1 1 T Y Y 1
Eucalyptus 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y 1
Imperial 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y Y
Juarez 1 1 T Y Y 2 1 1
Lincoln 1 1 T Y 1
Magnolia 1 Y
Miraloma 1 1 1 Y Y 1
Oak Park T Y Y
Oak Canyon Nature Center Y Y 2 1 1
Olive Hills Y 1 1
Pelanconi T Y Y Y Y
Peralta Canyon 1 1 T,2S Y 2 Y 2 1 1
Pioneer 2 2 1 T,S Y 1 Y 2
Rio Vista 2 2 T Y Y 1 1 1
Riverdale 1 1 T,S Y 1 Y Y 1
Ronald Reagan 1 1 T,2S Y 2 Y Y 1
Roosevelt
Sycamore 1 1 T,2S Y 2 Y Y 1
Changed to Ronald Regan Park 1 T,2S
Walnut Canyon Reservoir Y
Yorba 1 1 T Y 1 1 1
Chino Hills State Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Weir Canyon Regional Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Yorba Regional Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Fairmont Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Nohl Ranch Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Facilities:
L - Lighted S - Picnic Shelter T - Picnic Table
Y- Yes P - Proposed
Redlined Table G-1
3 of 3
Rec. Bldg./
Community
Center***
Community Center
(New)
Senior Center
(New)
Teen Center
(New)
Historic Facility
(New)
Recreation Room
(New)
Family Resource
Center (New)
Youth Center
(New)
Accessibility Center
(New)
Interpretive amenity /
signage Gymnasiums Library On-site Parking Adjacent Schools
WEST ANAHEIM (DISTRICT 1 & 2)
West Anaheim Youth Center 1 1 1 Y
Barton Barton Elementary School
Brookhurst CC/Senior 1 1 1 Y Gauer ES/Brookhurst JHS
Chaparral RC 1 Y
Circle
Hansen Hansen Elementary School
John Marshall RC 1 Y John Marshall Elementary School
Maxwell SC (Therapeutic)1 Y Maxwell Elementary School
Modjeska RC 1 Y Francis Scott Key Elementary School
Peter Marshall Peter Marshall Elementary School
Schweitzer Y Schweitzer Elementary School
Twila Reid RC 1 Y Twila Reid Elementary School
Delphi Y
CENTRAL ANAHEIM (DISTRICTS 3 & 4)
Anaheim Downtown Community Center and Gymnasium CC 1 1 1 1 1 Y
Boysen RC Y Roosevelt Elementary School
Citrus 1 Y
Colony
Colony Square
Cottonwood
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 RC Edison Elementary School
Energy Field
Founders' Park 1 1 Y
Friendship Plaza
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 RC Juarez Elementary School
Julianna
La Palma NC 1 1 Y
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 Lincoln Elementary School
Little People's
Manzanita NC 1 1 Y
Palm Lane Palm Lane Elementary/Ball JHS
Paul Revere
Pearson NC 1 Y
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 RC Sunkist Elementary School
Ponderosa NC 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y
Moved Below, Within Districts 5 & 6 RC Rio Vista Elementary School
Ross Y Ross Elementary School
Sage RC Y
Stoddard RC 1 Y Stoddard Elementary School
Walnut Grove
George Washington
Willow
EAST ANAHEIM (DISTRICTS 5 & 6)
East Anaheim Community Center and Gymnasium 1 1 1 Y
Anaheim Hills Elementary School Y
Anaheim Coves Y
Anaheim Wetlands
Canyon Rim RC 1 Y Canyon Rim Elementary School
Coral Tree
Deer Canyon Y
Edison RC Y Edison Elementary School
Eucalyptus RC 1 Y
Imperial Imperial Elementary School
Juarez RC 1 1 Y Juarez Elementary School
Lincoln Y Lincoln Elementary School
Magnolia
Miraloma 1 1 1 Y
Oak Park
Oak Canyon Nature Center SC (Interpretive)1 Y
Olive Hills Y Nohl Ranch Elementary School
Pelanconi Y
Peralta Canyon RC/NC 1 1 Y Crescent Primary/Intermediate School
Pioneer RC Y Sunkist Elementary School
Rio Vista RC 1 Rio Vista Elementary School
Riverdale Y
Ronald Reagan RC 1 Y
Roosevelt
Sycamore RC 1 Y
Changed to Ronald Regan Park RC
Walnut Canyon Reservoir
Yorba Y
Chino Hills State Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Weir Canyon Regional Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Yorba Regional Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Fairmont Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Nohl Ranch Park N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Recreation Buildings/Community Centers:
CC - Community Center (larger than 10,000 square feet)
NC - Neighborhood Center (smaller than 10,000 square feet)
SC - Special Use Center
RC - Recreation Center
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-40 | Revised April 2018May 2004
This page intentionally left blank
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-41
Additional City-Owned or Operated Facilities
In addition to the variety of parks identified above, the City is also home to a variety of
City-owned or operated recreational facilities. These include:
H.G. “Dad” Miller Golf Course – a 107-acre, 18-hole course with clubhouse and
driving range
Anaheim Hills Golf Course – a 174-acre, 18-hole course with driving range and club
house; located adjacent to the Oak Canyon Nature Center
Anaheim Tennis Center – a city owned, privately operated facility adjacent to Boysen
Park
PARK NEEDS
One of the primary goals of the Green Element is to ensure the adequate provision of
park facilities for the current and future residents of Anaheim. As the City approaches
build-out and its projected 2030 population of nearly 400,000, acquiring and
developing new parkland and meeting Anaheim’s current standard of two acres of
parkland per 1,000 residents will pose significant challenges. To offset some of these
demands, local school districts will continue to provide additional recreation
opportunities through formal and informal joint use agreements with the City.
As land becomes increasingly scarce, new and creative ways to accomplish this goal will
need to be implemented. Through the Green Plan (Figure G-1), Green Element policies,
and their implementation, the City of Anaheim will continue its tradition of meeting the
park and recreation needs of its residents.
The Green Plan: Park Deficiency Areas
One of the key features of the Green Plan (Figure G-1) is the identification of Park
Deficiency Areas. Park Deficiency Areas reflect those areas that, due to population
pressures and limited park opportunities, are underserved by recreational facilities and
includes residential areas that are located outside of a one -half mile radius of
Neighborhood and Community Parks or one-quarter mile radius of a Mini Park.
Community Parks have a service radius of two miles and also serve Neighborhood Park
functions within a one-half mile radius. any park facility. These areas are based on needs
established in the last update of the Parks and Recreation Elementfrom the 2018
Anahiem Parks Plan, demographic changes since the last update, and future land use and
employment trends described in the Land Use Element.
RECREATION PROGRAMS AND TRENDS
Recreation programs encompass all the organized recreational activities and self-
improvement courses sponsored by the City of Anaheim for people from pre -school age
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-42 | Revised April 2018May 2004
to the senior years. They are located throughout the City at parks, community centers
and local schools. These include:
Programs for Pre-Schoolers – These include the Tiny Tots program, tumbling classes,
dance, science, storytelling and arts and crafts. They are offered at limited times in a few
areas.
Programs for Elementary School Children – These constitute the majority of the City
programs and are often offered in conjunction with school activities. These programs
include sports and athletics, arts and crafts, story theatre, dance, self-improvement
courses and special events.
Teen Programs – This is a crucial age group to serve. The key element of this program
has been teen clubs, oriented towards junior high students. Other programs include
excursions, self-improvement classes, sports camps and athletic programs.
Adult Programs – Adult programs include a wide variety of fitness programs, self-
improvement classes, softball leagues, tennis, soccer, volleyball and table tennis
activities. Also included are a wide variety of subjects including computer classes,
academic preparation, language courses, science, health and safety-related courses. The
amount and type of classes offered depend on instructor availability, availability of
classrooms, demand and scheduling constraints.
Senior Citizen Programs – The City of Anaheim offers a full range of senior citizen
recreation and human resources programs. The programs are offered at senior and
community centers.
GOALS AND POLICIES
Adequate Supply of Parks
The City currently maintains park dedication standards that require new development to
ensure that two acres of parkland will be developed for each 1,000 residents added by
the proposed development. Depending upon the magnitude of the residential
development, the dedication may be in the form of direct dedication of improved land,
the payment of fees in lieu of dedication, or a combination of both. The City has a park
dedication ordinance, and park dedication fees are adjusted annually. While serving as
important amenities for future development, private parks and open space amenities are
not counted toward meeting park fee credits.
To supplement its own recreational facilities, the City has also entered into joint-use
agreements with local school districts. School facilities such as gymnasiums, play
equipment, sports fields, swimming pools and classrooms play a very important role in
meeting residents’ recreation needs and are available to the public as a result of these
agreements. City golf courses, regional parks, neighboring cities’ facilities and other
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-43
specialized facilities, including the Angel Stadium of Anaheim, the Arrowhead Pond o f
Anaheim, Disneyland, Disney’s California Adventure, Disney Ice and the Anaheim
Convention Center, also fill more specialized commercial recreation needs.
GOAL 18.1:
Provide sufficient indoor and outdoor park, recreation and community service
opportunities for existing and future residents and employees.
Policies:
1) Maintain a Citywide standard of at least two acres of parkland per thousand
residents.
2) Locate neighborhood parks within walking distance of the surrounding
neighborhood.
3) Locate parks adjacent to schools, where possible, to facilitate joint-use of
publicly owned land and facilities.
4) Design new facilities to serve as many compatible, overlapping uses as
possible such as baseball/softball outfields also serving as soccer fields.
5) Develop a network of at least one 10,000 square-foot multi-use, indoor
facility (e.g., gymnasium) per 25,000 residents.
6) Continue to provide a variety of park types and facilities, especially dedicated
sports fields and practice fields, that serve the diverse needs of Anaheim’s
neighborhoods.
7) Encourage development of park and community service facilities in areas of
high employment concentrations to serve workers and residents alike.
8) Consider acquiring properties adjacent to schools, properties available on an
opportunity basis, or excess freeway rights-of-way, when available, for park
purposes.
Broad Range of Recreational Opportunities
In a city as large as Anaheim, there is a wide range of recreational interests. In its many
parks, the City provides facilities for both organized sports and more passive uses such
as picnicking and barbecuing. Being a city with many young families and children, after
school programs, large sports fields, practice field areas and aquatic programs are in
high demand. But the City also contains a large adult population with specialized
recreation needs that include cultural programs, arts and crafts, and community events.
The design and re-design of parks is, therefore, an on-going process, and the
programming of recreational opportunities relies on using best management practices.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-44 | Revised April 2018May 2004
The key is to stay connected with residents and use pro-active planning to anticipate
changing needs.
GOAL 19.1:
Provide a broad range of recreation programs including fee and non -fee based sports
activities, cultural programs, arts and crafts and Citywide events.
Policies:
1)Provide a wide variety of recreational facilities – in both active and passive
areas of parks to satisfy diverse needs and activities.
2)Design and redesign parks to reflect the latest recreational features,
responsive to population trends and community needs.
3)Continue to ensure responsive management practices that include staff
training, efficient scheduling, and coordination with other City departments.
4)Tailor recreation programs to serve the community and include specialized
populations, such as pre-school and elementary school children, teens,
senior citizens, families, young adults and those with special needs.
5)Develop non-traditional approaches to provide supplementary services and
programs where facility deficiencies exist (e.g., mobile programs, street
events, entertainment, storefront operations).
6)Continue to develop public/private partnerships to expand recreational
programs and opportunities.
7)Encourage the development of recreation programs aimed at serving the
needs of businesses and employees within Anaheim.
8)Provide disability access to all park and recreation facilities.
Park Safety, Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Parks are among the most highly desired amenities that a city can provide, and their
enjoyment depends, in large measure, on attention to detail. First and foremost, they
must be safe places to enjoy for all members of the community. This means that facilities
and equipment must be well maintained, that landscaping is carefully planned and
maintained with security in mind, that organized activities are well supervised, and that
ample lighting exists for authorized night use.
GOAL 20.1:
Vigorously maintain and upgrade Anaheim’s parks and recreation facilities to better serve
the needs of residents and workers.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-45
Policies:
1) Continue to promote safety through active ordinance enforcement, risk
management reviews, improved signage, park security programs and
neighborhood park stewardship and community-based safety programs.
2) Continue to improve and maintain proper lighting in park facilities and fields
without undue glare impacts on adjoining residential areas.
3) Reduce potential for injury by careful selection of equipment and timely
repair of facilities.
4) Continue to conduct safety reviews of each park on a regular basis.
5) Convert underutilized areas within existing parks to better meet the needs of
the community.
6) Continue to conduct regular reviews of existing public parks to determine
maintenance needs, funding priorities, and long-term rehabilitation costs.
7) Reduce potential for vandalism through continued police patrols,
neighborhood watch programs, stewardship programs and public outreach.
Community Outreach
A strong parks and recreation program is one that involves the community in its
evaluation and programming. It has long been a goal of the City of Anaheim to involve
all potential users in the effective planning and implementation of its parks and recreation
program. The City periodically updates the parks and recreation and community services
sections of the General Plan and conducts Citywide needs assessments as addressed in
the Community Services Strategic Plan.
GOAL 21.1:
Conduct periodic and comprehensive community outreach efforts to improve our park
and recreation facilities.
Policies:
1) Gather and evaluate community input on parks, recreation facilities and
programs on a regular schedule.
2) Reevaluate design improvements, equipment and amenities of all City parks
as part of the periodic updating of the Green Element.
3) Involve park users and citizens in the evaluation of park design through
community workshops, design charettes and evaluation forms and surveys.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-46 | Revised April 2018May 2004
4) Pursue efforts to communicate in different languages with, and understand
the needs of, the City’s culturally diverse park users.
5) Continue to create a greater sense of stewardship for parks within each
neighborhood and community through active public involvement (e.g., “Kids
for Parks,” public meetings, booster and service clubs) and volunteerism.
6) Maintain active outreach efforts between public and private agencies to
provide a broad array of services and programs.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-47
Improving Trails to Connect
Anaheim
n important part of the City’s recreation program is its system of trails and
bikeways. This system provides residents with connections to parks, natural
open space, community facilities and the regional network of trails and bikeways.
EQUESTRIAN, RIDING AND HIKING TRAILS PLAN
The City of Anaheim updated its Equestrian,
Riding and Hiking Trails Plan with the adoption of
its Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Element in 1992. This represented a continuation
and modification of the 1976 Trails Element of
the General Plan. The current Master Plan [Figure
G-5] shows the general alignment and
classification of present and future trails,
establishes a trail hierarchy, sets forth
development standards for each class of trails, and
outlines an implementation program. It delineates
approximately 46 miles of trails for hikers,
equestrians, pedestrians and mountain bikers.
While trails are discussed in the Green Element,
bikeways are addressed in the Circulation Element.
There are five primary goals of the trail system as
described in the Master Plan:
Provide a mix of trails to accommodate short,
medium and long rides or hikes;
Link parks and other public uses and facilities together, wherever feasible;
A
The Weir Canyon Trail is one of the many
Anaheim trails that connect Anaheim
residents to nature and to other recreational
opportunities.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-48 | Revised April 2018May 2004
Link to regional trails in Orange and Riverside Counties as well as to the Cleveland
National Forest and Chino Hills State Park;
Implement the trail system at all planning levels to ensure appropriate dedication and
improvement of rights-of-way; and
Take advantage of existing rights-of-way, wherever possible, for trail development
(i.e. flood control channels, railroad rights-of-way, and powerline easements).
Most of the trails to be completed are in the eastern portion of the Hill and Canyon
Area. There are a number of gaps in the existing trails system due to difficult terrain,
intervening development or lack of necessary dedication. It is important to fill these gaps
since they prevent completion of trail loops and give an incremental, incomplete
character to the trail system and greatly reduce its convenience. An inventory of planned
trails is provided in Table G-3.
TABLE G-2: INVENTORY OF EXISTING & PLANNED TRAILS
No. Name
Length
(miles) No. Name
Length
(miles)
1 Santa Ana Canyon 6.93 13 Oak Canyon 1.94
2 Lakeview 0.23 14 Hidden Canyon 2.39
3 Crescent 0.44 15 Weir Canyon 3.68
4 Pelanconi 0.47 16 East Hills 1.29
5 Mohler Drive 0.23 17 Savi Canal 0.84
6 Country 0.68 18 Anaheim Hills 1.14
7 North Loop 0.25 19 Nohl Ranch 1.16
8 Rainbow 0.61 20 Four Corners 4.14
9 Hummingbird 0.51 21 Santa Ana River 10.30
10 Imperial 0.23 22 Oak Canyon – East 0.58
11 Walnut Canyon Reservoir 1.56 23 Ridgeline 1.80
12 Fairmont 1.61 24 Golf Course Trail 2.89
TOTAL 45.9
The Master Plan will be extended to areas east of Weir Canyon Road providing direct
links to the Cleveland National Forest trail network via the Coal Canyon and Santiago
Trails and to the Riverside County riding and hiking trails via the Santa Ana River Trail.
COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN: TRAILS HIERARCHY
The Equestrian, Riding and Hiking Trails Plan is comprised of the following components:
Regional Trails – These include major trails that are included in the Orange County
General Plan, including the Santa Ana River Trail, developed to County standards.
Ho
l
d
e
r
S
t
Kn
o
t
t
A
v
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
A
v
e
Be
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
Da
l
e
S
t
Ma
g
n
o
l
i
a
A
v
e
Gi
l
b
e
r
t
S
t
Br
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
Mu
l
l
e
r
S
t
La Palma Ave
Crescent Ave
Lincoln Ave
Broadway
Orange Ave
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Chapman Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Nu
t
w
o
o
d
S
t
9t
h
S
t
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
Di
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Le
w
i
s
S
t
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
Do
u
g
l
a
s
s
R
d
S
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
Disney Way
Gene Autry Way
W
e
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
O
li
v
e
S
t
E
a
s
t
S
tS o u t h S t
V e r m o n t A v e
S a n t a A n a S tBroadwayLincolnAve
S y c a m o r e S tNorthSt
Ball Rd
Wagner Ave
South St
La Palma Ave
Romneya Dr
Orangethorpe Ave
Eu
c
l
i
d
S
t
Le
m
o
n
S
t
Ra
y
m
o
n
d
A
v
e
Ha
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Ac
a
c
i
a
A
v
e
St
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
P l a c e n t i a A v e
Su
n
k
i
s
t
S
t
Ri
o
V
i
s
t
a
S
t
Crowther Ave
O r a n g e t h o r p e A v e
M i r a l o m a A v e
L a P a l m a A v e
R
e
d
G
u
m
S
t
K
r
a
e
m
e
r
B
l
v
d
M
ill
e
r
S
t
TustinA
ve
Va
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
L
a
k
e
v
i
e
w
A
v
e
Ke
l
l
o
g
g
D
r
Esperan z a R dOrangethorpeAve
La Palma Ave
ImperialHwy
Sa
n
t
i
a g o B l
M e a t s A v e
I m p e r i a l H w y
NohlRanch R d
Santa Ana Canyon Rd
Fair
m
ontBlvd
C a n y o n RimRd S e r r a n o A v e
W
eir
C
a
n
yonRd
O a k C a nyon D r
M
e
t
r
o
li
n
k
|ÿ241
|ÿ91|ÿ90
|ÿ55|ÿ57
|ÿ91
§¨¦5
B
l
u
e
G
u
m
S
t
Cerritos A v e
Lo
a
r
a
S
t
Romneya Dr A
n
a
h
e
i
m
H
ill
s
R
d
2 1
32
4 20 10 18
1 9
1
3
1
1
24
9
17
2 0
24
14
1
4
7
8
5
6
2 0
1 6
22
1 1
2 1 1
15
1
5
2 3
12
Equestrian, Riding andHiking Trails Plan
City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
Figure G-5 Page G-47
City Boundary
0 1 20.5 Miles
Trail Study Area
Feeder
Backbone
Regional
Sphere-of-Influence
Feeder Trail Overlay
Note:
Trails shown of this plan are either existing or planned.
Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: March 8, 2016
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-50 | Revised April 2018May 2004
This page intentionally left blank
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-51
Backbone Trails – These are major links in the overall City trail system. They provide
access out of local areas to the trail system as a whole and, as such, will generally
receive priority for trail capital improvements funded out of the City’s budget or
through grants. Backbone trails may also be dedicated and developed by individual
developers, as conditioned by the City.
Feeder Trails – These are public trails that serve a local purpose, usually in an
equestrian-oriented neighborhood. While not as critical as the backbone trail
system, feeder trails do serve an important role as short loops.
Feeder trail systems are required to be dedicated in connection with development of
properties along the trail route. Private trails are not shown on the Equestrian,
Riding and Hiking Trails Plan map (Figure G-5). Where private trails exist, they
should remain under private ownership. Future private trails should be designed and
laid out to link with the public trails system.
Feeder Trail Overlay – This specifies areas where feeder trails for primarily equestrian
uses should be dedicated and improved as development occurs, but where precise
trail routes have not yet been mapped.
Trail Heads – These are major nodes where resting and staging facilities are
provided. Such amenities can include parking, hitching posts, water, picnic facilities,
shade trees, trail markers and informational postings and bulletin boards.
Trail Loops – These are the basis of the trail system in the Master Plan. The idea is
to provide varying lengths of trail loops that allow riders to return to their point of
departure without requiring them to double back during their trip.
Varied Trail Segments – Trail segments should vary in terrain, difficulty and
surrounding environment to provide users with a varied and interesting trail options .
Some trails run along urban streets with access to shopping and community facilities,
offering an alternative to the car or sidewalks. Other trails link, circle or run through
open, scenic and natural areas.
Expanded Trail System east of Weir Canyon – The trail system will be expanded in the
area east of Weir Canyon Road as the area develops. This provides direct links to
the Chino Hills State Park and Cleveland National Forest trail network, and links to
Riverside County’s riding and hiking trails via the Santa Ana River Trail.
Trail Study Areas – A number of trail study areas have been identified on Figure G-5 that
depict potential trail locations that connect residents with recreational opportunities,
schools and activity centers such as Downtown, Anaheim Canyon, The Anaheim Resort
and The Platinum Triangle. The locations of these study areas are based on existing
utility easements, railroad rights-of-way and flood control channels. Although they are
mapped, the feasibility of their implementation has yet to be determined. Analysis of
these study areas will need to look at potential intergovernmental or joint use
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-52 | Revised April 2018May 2004
agreements, allowable trail uses, physical obstacles such as road crossings or existing
development that interrupt trail connections, ownership constraints, and funding issues
to determine their feasibility.
GOALS AND POLICIES
Completing the Trail System
Although the City is largely built-out, there is significant development that will continue
in the eastern portion of Anaheim and focused areas in central and western Anaheim,
and the trail system will be completed as those areas develop. In addition, existing gaps
in the system need to be filled to provide the most complete and convenient trail system
possible. Beyond the planning of the system, the challenge will be to devise the best
possible program for constructing, upgrading and maintaining the system. Currently,
trail dedication and development exactions are the primary method of implementing the
Equestrian, Riding and Hiking Trails Plan. Coordination with regional bodies and filling
in trail gaps within existing public rights-of-way will also help complete the system.
GOAL 22.1:
Complete the Equestrian, Riding and Hiking Trails Plan by closing gaps in the existing
network of trails.
Policies:
1) Obtain dedication, acquisition and development of trail rights-of-way to City
standards in order to complete the trail network shown on the Green Plan
and Equestrian, Riding and Hiking Trails Plan.
2) Ensure that the trail system’s completion provides a mix of short, medium
and long rides or hikes.
3) Link the trail system, where feasible, with existing or future parks and other
appropriate public areas.
4) Link the trail system with Orange and Riverside Counties’ regional trails and
with those in the Cleveland National Forest and Chino Hills State Park.
5) Expand the trail system by incorporating trails and trail stops within public
and quasi-public rights-of-way.
6) Expand the trail system by working with the County of Orange to incorporate
a hiking and biking trail along Carbon Creek.
7) Coordinate with the Orange County Water District and Regional Water
Quality Control Board to expand uses within water basins to include trails
and trail access.
8) Require homeowners associations to provide trail maintenance, repairs and
insurance, where appropriate in private developments.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-53
BEAUTIFYING THE CITY: Public
Landscaping and Street Trees
ne of the major goals of the Green Element is to beautify the City. Because the
image of the City is often experienced from an automobile traveling along major
corridors, a well-designed program of corridor landscaping and neighborhood
street trees can reinforce an attractive community image.
Cities have long realized the key role that public landscaping, including its ongoing
maintenance plays in their image. Some cities even have a City flower and an adopted
landscape palette, but few go so far as to include a landscaping component as part of
their General Plan. By including such a component in its Green Element, the City is
taking a comprehensive approach to landscape planning as a key ingredient in the
beautification of Anaheim.
This section also reinforces the role of
landscaping to enhance the community’s
image as described in the goals and policies
of the Community Design Element. The
Green Element helps provide a strong
unifying City image through policies that
support theme landscaping and street trees.
The plan supports the City’s Urban
Forestry Program, whose goal is to
maintain, enhance and expand the City’s
stock of trees. In addition, the Green
Element is consistent with the City’s many
corridor master plans. One of the goals of
the Green Element is to address the landscape gaps along the major corridors and
enhance City entryways and community edges with landscape improvement
recommendations.
O
A landscaped median and parkway along
Romneya Drive provide an aesthetically pleasing
entryway into the area anchored by the Anaheim
Campus of the North Orange County Community
College District.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-54 | Revised April 2018May 2004
In addition to creating a more aesthetically pleasing environment, landscape programs
can also improve environmental quality, reduce energy costs, and enhance the pedestrian
experience – all important goals of the Anaheim General Plan. For example, the
inclusion of canopy trees in corridor landscape programs can provide many such
benefits. They provide shade, which reduces exposure to ultraviolet light and cools
roadways, sidewalks and ambient air temperatures. By reducing temperatures, they
provide comfortable walking areas and reduce energy costs for shaded buildings.
Furthermore, canopy trees can store rainfall on their leaves and branches, reducing
overland water flow and subsequent stormwater runoff.
GOALS AND POLICIES
Public Landscaping and Street Trees
Anaheim devotes major funding to public landscaping, including medians, parkway
maintenance and street trees. The Urban Forestry Section of the Community Services
Department maintains street trees in residential, commercial and industrial areas and
maintains the Official Trees Specie List, which consists of the 25 most commonly found
parkway trees within Anaheim. The Tree Power Program, funded by the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department, provides free shade trees to private property owners with the goal
of reducing demand for electricity. The non-profit Community ReLeaf Anaheim
coordinates community partnership tree plantings within the City’s right-of-way. The
City has attained the status of “Tree City USA” every year since 1984 by the National
Arbor Day Fund and maintains a database of the condition and location of its over
70,000 public trees.
Because landscaping along public rights-of-way is one of the most effective methods of
improving community appearance and creating pleasant pedestrian-friendly
environments, the City has also made it a major aesthetic and
capital improvement priority. Since the City is framed and
traversed by major arterial corridors, it is imperative that the City
creates a Citywide landscape plan at major entry points, key
intersections and corridors, where visibility is the greatest.
Powerline easements that intersect with these corridors should also be landscaped to
soften the visual impacts of the powerlines from these corridors and to provide visible
access points to those easements that are designated as open space connections on the
Green Plan (Figure C-1).
Major stretches of corridors in the City are already beautifully landscaped; the goal is to
expand this program throughout the City. Combined with efforts to underground
utilities and provide unifying streetscape elements, the City will be recognized for its
attractive and well-designed arterial corridors.
Please reference the Community
Design Element, Enhanced Arterial
Corridors, for detailed design policies.
GREEN ELEMENT
Revised April 2018 City of Anaheim General Plan | Page G-55
GOAL 23.1
Continue to improve and expand the City’s comprehensive tree programs.
Policies:
1) Preserve mature street trees where practical.
2) Evaluate and potentially modify parkway standards where appropriate.
3) Evaluate current standards to provide larger openings and wells, where
practical, for tree placement to accommodate future growth and to mitigate
potential damage to sidewalks and infrastructure.
4) Continue to pursue a variety of funding sources for the acquisition,
accelerated maintenance and possible replacement of street trees.
5) Continue to strengthen neighborhood and community identity by using tree
species consistent with the City’s Official Tree Specie List.
6) Continue to identify neighborhoods in need of additional parkway trees and
plant them as funding becomes available.
GOAL 23.2:
Complete the City’s comprehensive program of corridor landscaping, including
entryways, medians, and parkways, to strengthen the identity of major corridors and the
City as a whole.
Policies:
1) Develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive landscape program for
corridors in need of landscaping improvements.
2) Adopt landscape themes that give special identity to each corridor and
reinforce the City’s overall image.
3) Develop specialized landscape and design treatment for key entryways,
intersections and powerline easements identified on the Green Plan, in
accordance with the Community Design Element.
4) Develop guiding policies for accommodating drought-tolerant landscaping
(xeriscaping) where it is considered appropriate.
(Res. 2017-081, May 23, 2017)
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Page G-56 | Revised April 2018May 2004
This page intentionally left blank
-6- PC2018-***
EXHIBIT “B”
APN: 12829201(City Owned)
PARK CIR
Park Name: CIRCLE PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 4020 FeetPark Type: POCKET
EXHIBIT "B"
Residen tial-Medium
APN : 12 829201(C ity Ow ned)
PARK CIR
Park Name: CIRCLE PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Existing General Plan 0 4020 FeetPark Type: POCKET
Residen tial-Medium
Parks
APN : 12 829201(C ity Ow ned)
PARK CIR
Park Name: CIRCLE PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Proposed General Plan 0 4020 FeetPark Type: POCKET
APN : 03 712319(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 03 730105(C ity Ow ned)
K
R
O
E
G
E
R
S
T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
W A T E R S T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 5025 Feet
Residen tial-Medium
Residen tial-LowMedium
APN : 03 712319(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 03 730105(C ity Ow ned)
K
R
O
E
G
E
R
S
T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
W A T E R S T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Existing General Plan 0 7035 Feet
Residen tial-Medium
Residen tial-LowMedium
Parks
APN : 03 712319(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 03 730105(C ity Ow ned)
K
R
O
E
G
E
R
S
T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
W A T E R S T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Proposed General Plan 0 7035 Feet
APN : 255 07611(C ity Ow ned)
L I N C O L N A V E
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY SQUARE
Park Type: Pocket ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 2512.5 Feet
Parks
Mixed Use
Residen tial-Medium
APN : 255 07611(C ity Ow ned)
E
M
I
L
Y
S
T
L I N C O L N A V E
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY SQUARE
Park Type: Pocket ¯Existing General Plan 0 3015 Feet
Parks
Mixed Use
Residen tial-Medium
APN : 255 07611(C ity Ow ned)
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: COLONY SQUARE
Park Type: Pocket ¯Proposed General Plan 0 2512.5 Feet
APN : 356 54110(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 652102(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 650101(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 657101(C ityOwned)
APN : 35 654106(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 356 15110(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 558130(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 560134(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 354 20118(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 654104(C ity Ow ned)APN : 35 654109(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 638137(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 647217(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 615109(C ity Ow ned)
APN:35657 102 (CityOwned)
APN : 08 560158(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 560173(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 647201(C ity Ow ned)
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
N O H L RANCHR
D
CANYONRIMRD
S E R R A N O
A V E
WEIR CANYON R D
FAIRMONTBLVD
Park Name: DEER CANYON PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 0.20.1 MilesPark Type: NATURE
Parks
Residen tial-LowMedium Hillside
Residen tial-LowMedium
Water
Residen tial-Low
School
Open Space
APN : 35 657101(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 657102(C ity Ow ned)
CANYON RIM RD
S E R R A N O A V E
Park Name: DEER CANYON PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Existing General Plan 0 0.10.05 MilesPark Type: NATURE
Parks
Residen tial-LowMedium Hillside
Residen tial-LowMedium
Water
Residen tial-Low
School
Open Space
APN : 35 657101(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 35 657102(C ity Ow ned)
CANYON RIM RD
S E R R A N O A V E
Park Name: DEER CANYON PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Proposed General Plan 0 0.10.05 MilesPark Type: NATURE
APN : 12 945231(C ity Ow ned)
B A Y L E S S S T
AUDRE DR
N I N T H S T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: ENERGY FIELD PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 10050 Feet
Railroad
Pu blic-Institutional
Residen tial-MediumResidential-Low
Water
Open Space
APN : 12 945231(C ity Ow ned)AUDRE DR
N I N T H
S T
B A Y L E S S S T
STONEMAN
P
L
PACIFIC CT
H A M P S T E A D S T
LASTER AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: ENERGY FIELD PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing General Plan 0 13065 Feet
Railroad
Pu blic-Institutional Residen tial-Medium
Open Space
Residen tial-Low
Water
Parks
APN : 12 945231(C ity Ow ned)AUDRE DR
B A Y L E S S S T
N I N T H S T
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: ENERGY FIELD PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed General Plan 0 10050 Feet
APN : 25 509207(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 25 509205(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 25 509204(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 25 509206(C ity Ow ned)
W
E
S
T
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: FOUNDERS' PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 8040 Feet
School
Residen tial-Low
APN : 25 509207(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 25 509205(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 25 509204(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 25 509206(C ity Ow ned)
D
W
Y
E
R
D
R
W
E
S
T
S
T
S Y C A M O R E S T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: FOUNDERS' PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing General Plan 0 10050 Feet
School
Residen tial-Low
Parks
APN : 25 509207(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 25 509205(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 25 509204(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 25 509206(C ity Ow ned)
D
W
Y
E
R
D
R
W
E
S
T
S
T
S Y C A M O R E S T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: FOUNDERS' PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed General Plan 0 10050 Feet
APN : 25 350101(C ity Ow ned)
A N N I K A S T
G R A N I T E C I R
NYON AVE
OSHKOSH AVE
HILDA PL
S U N K I S T S T
AMES AVE
VERMONT AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JUAREZ PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 17085 Feet
Pu blic-Institutional
Parks
School
Residen tial-Low
APN : 25 350101(C ity Ow ned)
A N N I K A S T
J A S P E R C I R
G R A N I T E C I R
S I E T P L
S U N K I S T S T
A M B R I D G E S T
P E R E G R I N E P L
C H A U C E R S T
V A L E A V E
NYON AVE
HILDA PL
OSHKOSH AVE
AMES AVE
VERMONT AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JUAREZ PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing General Plan 0 230115 Feet
Parks
School
Residen tial-Low
APN : 25 350101(C ity Ow ned)
A N N I K A S T
J A S P E R C I R
G R A N I T E C I R
S I E T P L
S U N K I S T S T
A M B R I D G E S T
P E R E G R I N E P L
C H A U C E R S T
V A L E A V E
NYON AVE
HILDA PL
OSHKOSH AVE
AMES AVE
VERMONT AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JUAREZ PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed General Plan 0 230115 Feet
APN : 126 04116(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 126 04117(C ity Ow ned)
M A G N O L I A A V E
BROADWAY
ROWLAND AVE
BRIDGEPORT AVE
ORANGE AVE
SKYWOOD PL
R E N O A K S T
T R O J A N S T
S H E R R I L L S T
D O Y L E
D R
K E N M O R E S T
R U N Y O N P LSHIELDS
D
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MAXWELL PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 320160 Feet
Residen tial-Low
Parks
OpenSpace
School
Pu blic-Institutional
Residen tia l-Corridor
Water
Residen tial-Medium
Residen tial-LowMedium
APN : 126 04117(C ity Ow ned)
D A L E A V E
BROADWAY
V E L A R E S T
WESTHAVEN DR
ACADEMY AVE
M A G N O L I A A V E
ORANGE AVE
ROWLAND AVE
B RIDGEPORT AVE
V I C K I L N
S H E R R I L L S T
T R O J A N S T
D
O
Y
L
E
D R
G A I N S T
A R O N S T
K E N M O R E S T
TOLA AVE
S Y L V A N S T
S H I E L D S
D R
V E R O N A S T
S C O T T L N
SEREN O PL
TROJAN PL
R E N O A K S T
ROVEN AVE
R U N Y O N PL
B E N W O O D D R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MAXWELL PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing General Plan 0 430215 Feet
Residen tial-Low
Parks
OpenSpace
Pu blic-Institutional
School
Residen tia l-Corridor
Water
Residen tial-Medium
Residen tial-LowMedium
APN : 126 04117(C ity Ow ned)
D A L E A V E
BROADWAY
V E L A R E S T
WESTHAVEN DR
ACADEMY AVE
M A G N O L I A A V E
ORANGE AVE
ROWLAND AVE
B RIDGEPORT AVE
V I C K I L N
S H E R R I L L S T
T R O J A N S T
D
O
Y
L
E
D R
G A I N S T
A R O N S T
K E N M O R E S T
TOLA AVE
S Y L V A N S T
S H I E L D S
D R
V E R O N A S T
S C O T T L N
SEREN O PL
TROJAN PL
R E N O A K S T
ROVEN AVE
R U N Y O N PL
B E N W O O D D R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MAXWELL PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed General Plan 0 430215 Feet
APN : 34 439203(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 34 439204(C ity Ow ned)
SU
NSHINE W
AY
M I R A L O M A A V E
MIRALOMA WAY
F
A
S
H
I
O
N
L
N
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MIRALOMA PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 9045 Feet
Ind ustrial
Residen tial-Medium
APN : 34 439203(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 34 439204(C ity Ow ned)
MIRALOMA WAY
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
A
V
E
SU
NSHINE W
AY
M I R A L O M A A V E
F
A
S
H
I
O
N
L
N
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MIRALOMA PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing General Plan 0 12060 Feet
Ind ustrial
Residen tial-Medium
Parks
APN : 34 439203(C ity Ow ned)APN : 34 439204(C ity Ow ned)
MIRALOMA WAY
L
A
W
R
E
N
C
E
A
V
E
SU
NSHINE W
AY
M I R A L O M A A V E
F
A
S
H
I
O
N
L
N
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MIRALOMA PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed General Plan 0 12060 Feet
APN : 08 558130(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 558136(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 558137(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 558128(C ity Ow ned)
S E R R A N O A V E
Park Name: OAK CANYON NATURE CENTER Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 400200 FeetPark Type: NATURE
Residen tial-Low
Water
Parks
Residen tial-LowMedium Hillside
Residential-Estate
APN : 08 558136(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 558137(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 558128(C ity Ow ned)
S E R R A N O A V E
Park Name: OAK CANYON NATURE CENTER Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Existing General Plan 0 400200 FeetPark Type: NATURE
Residen tial-Low
Water
Parks
Residen tial-LowMedium Hillside
Residential-Estate
APN : 08 558136(C ity Ow ned)
APN:08558 137 (CityOwned)
APN : 08 558128(C ity Ow ned)
S E R R A N O A V E
Park Name: OAK CANYON NATURE CENTER Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Proposed General Plan 0 400200 FeetPark Type: NATURE
APN : 08 249214(C ity Ow ned)APN : 08 249215(C ity Ow ned)
I R I S S T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PAUL REVERE PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 3015 Feet
Parks School
Residen tial-Medium
APN : 08 249214(C ity Ow ned)APN : 08 249215(C ity Ow ned)
I R I S S T
GUINIDA LN
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PAUL REVERE PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Existing General Plan 0 4020 Feet
School
Residen tial-Medium
ParksAPN: 08 249214(C ity Ow ned)APN : 08 249215(C ity Ow ned)
I R I S S T
GUINIDA LN
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PAUL REVERE PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Proposed General Plan 0 4020 Feet
APN : 36 309217(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 36 324231(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 36 303401(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 36 325101(C ity Ow ned)
A V E N I D A B E R N A R D O NORTH
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
BE
R
N
A
R
D
OSOUTH
T A B L E R O C K P L
HONEYWOODLN
SUNCREST RD
A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A
CALLE CANADA
WESTRIDGE RD
SMOKERIDGE TER
WESTRIDGE CIR
S I L V E R B R O O K
D R
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: PELANCONI PARK
Park Type: Nature ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 370185 Feet
NeighborhoodCenter
Residen tial-LowMedium Hillside
Parks
Residen tial-Low APN : 36 324231(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 36 303401(C ity Ow ned)
A V E N I D A B E R N A R D O NORTH
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
BE
R
N
A
R
D
OSOUTH
T A B L E R O C K P L
HONEYWOODLN
SUNCREST RD
A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A
CALLE CANADA
WESTRIDGE RD
SMOKERIDGE TER
WESTRIDGE CIR
S I L V E R B R O O K
D R
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: PELANCONI PARK
Park Type: Nature ¯Existing General Plan 0 370185 Feet
NeighborhoodCenter
Residen tial-LowMedium Hillside
Parks
Residen tial-Low
APN : 36 324231(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 36 303401(C ity Ow ned)
A V E N I D A B E R N A R D O NORTH
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
BE
R
N
A
R
D
OSOUTH
T A B L E R O C K P L
HONEYWOODLN
SUNCREST RD
A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A
CALLE CANADA
WESTRIDGE RD
SMOKERIDGE TER
WESTRIDGE CIR
S I L V E R B R O O K
D R
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: PELANCONI PARK
Park Type: Nature ¯Proposed General Plan 0 370185 Feet
APN : 08 302055(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 302041(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 302036(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 302060(C ity Ow ned)
S U N K I S T S T
S H A K E S P E A R E S T
M I L T O N S T
UNDERHILL AVE
SYCAMORE ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PIONEER PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 19095 Feet
School
Residen tial-Low
Parks
APN : 08 302055(C ity Ow ned)APN : 08 302036(C ity Ow ned)
S U N K I S T S T
S H A K E S P E A R E S T
UNDERHILL AVE
M I L T O N S T
SYCAMORE ST
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: PIONEER PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing General Plan 0 200100 Feet
School
Residen tial-Low
Parks
APN : 08 302055(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 08 302036(C ity Ow ned)
S U N K I S T S T
S H A K E S P E A R E S T
UNDERHILL AVE
M I L T O N S T
SYCAMORE ST
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: PIONEER PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed General Plan 0 200100 Feet
APN: 23316111(C ity O w ned)
APN : 13 735313(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 13 735314(C ity Ow ned)
ORANGEWOOD AVE
H A S T E R S T
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
BLUE BELL PL
V
E
R
N
S
T
BLUEBELL AVE
CLIFFWOOD AVE
WILKEN WAY
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PONDEROSA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 19095 Feet
School
Residen tial-Low
Parks
Residen tial-LowMedium
Residen tial-Medium
APN: 23316111(C ity O w ned)
ORANGEWOOD AVE
H A S T E R S T
J E T T Y D R
M O U N T A I N
V I E W
A V
E
V E R N S T
S P R A G U E L N
BLUEBELL AVE
CLIFFWOOD AVE
WILKEN WAY
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PONDEROSA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing General Plan 0 260130 Feet
SchoolResidential-Low
Parks
Residen tial-LowMedium
Residen tial-Medium
APN: 23316111(C ity O w ned)
ORANGEWOOD AVE
H A S T E R S T
J E T T Y D R
M O U N T A I N
V I E W
A V
E
V E R N S T
S P R A G U E L N
BLUEBELL AVE
CLIFFWOOD AVE
WILKEN WAY
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PONDEROSA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed General Plan 0 260130 Feet
APN : 26 832105(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 26 801314(C ity Ow ned)
DUTCH AVE
K I N G S L E Y S T
B A R B A R A S T
A L I C E S TJEANINE W A Y
P A R K V I S T A
S T
B E T H C I R
C O N N I E C I R
GREENHEDGE AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: RIO VISTA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 225112.5 Feet
Residen tial-Medium
Residen tial-LowMedium
School
Parks
Residen tial-Low
APN : 26 832105(C ity Ow ned)
G L E N D O N S T
R I O
V I S T A S T
Q U E E N S B U R Y S T
P A R K
V I S T A
S T
DUTCH AVE
MARDI GRAS AVE
K I N G S L E Y S T
J E A N I N E W A Y
J E A N I N E D R
CARNIVAL AVE
A L I C E W A Y
B E T H S T
B A R B A R A S T
A L I C E S T
P L A N T A T I O N P L
C O N N I E C I R
B E T H C I R
GREENHEDGE AVE
JACKSON AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: RIO VISTA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing General Plan 0 300150 Feet
Residen tial-Medium
Residen tial-LowMedium
School
Parks
Residen tial-Low
APN : 26 832105(C ity Ow ned)
G L E N D O N S T
R I O
V I S T A S T
Q U E E N S B U R Y S T
P A R K
V I S T A
S T
DUTCH AVE
MARDI GRAS AVE
K I N G S L E Y S T
J E A N I N E W A Y
J E A N I N E D R
CARNIVAL AVE
A L I C E W A Y
B E T H S T
B A R B A R A S T
A L I C E S T
P L A N T A T I O N P L
C O N N I E C I R
B E T H C I R
GREENHEDGE AVE
JACKSON AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: RIO VISTA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed General Plan 0 300150 Feet
APN : 09 062209(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 090 01104(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 090 58119(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 090 01103(C ity Ow ned)
N I N T H S T
WAKEFIELD AVE
M A R G I E L N
G A I L L N
N E V I S C T
W A V E R L Y D R
FLIPPEN WAY
F L I P P E N D R
E I L E E N D R
B A Y L E S S S T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: STODDARD PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 230115 Feet
Residen tial-Medium
Parks
NeighborhoodCenter School
Residen tial-LowMedium
Residen tial-LowWater
Gene ra l Com m ercial
APN : 09 062209(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 090 58119(C ity Ow ned)
PALMA VISTA ST
N I N T H S T
W A K E F I E L D A V E
F L I P P E N D R
N E V I S C T
STELLA AVE
DUDLEY AVE
L O A R A S T
L I N D A L O A L N N O R M A L N
M A R G I E L N
FLIPPEN WAY
RICKY AVE
G A I L L N
E I L E E N D R
AMARITA LN W A V E R L Y D R
B A Y L E S S
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: STODDARD PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing General Plan 0 310155 Feet
Residen tial-Medium
Parks
NeighborhoodCenter School
Residen tial-LowMedium
Residen tial-LowWater
Gene ra l Com m ercial
APN : 09 062209(C ity Ow ned)
APN : 090 58119(C ity Ow ned)
PALMA VISTA ST
N I N T H S T
W A K E F I E L D A V E
F L I P P E N D R
N E V I S C T
STELLA AVE
DUDLEY AVE
L O A R A S T
L I N D A L O A L N N O R M A L N
M A R G I E L N
FLIPPEN WAY
RICKY AVE
G A I L L N
E I L E E N D R
AMARITA LN W A V E R L Y D R
B A Y L E S S
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: STODDARD PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed General Plan 0 310155 Feet
APN : 35 104229(C ity Ow ned)
P
U
L
L
M
A
N
S
T
L A P A L M A A V E
YORBALINDABLVD
C R Y S T A L D R
Park Name: YORBA REGIONAL PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 200100 FeetPark Type: NEIGHBORHOOD
GeneralCommercial
Ind ustrial
Parks
Water
Residen tial-Low
Open Space
APN : 35 104229(C ity Ow ned)
P
U
L
L
M
A
N
S
T
L A P A L M A A V E
YORBALINDABLVD
C R Y S T A L D R
Park Name: YORBA REGIONAL PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Existing General Plan 0 200100 FeetPark Type: NEIGHBORHOOD
GeneralCommercial
Ind ustrial
Parks
Water
Residen tial-Low
Open Space
APN : 35 104229(C ity Ow ned)
P
U
L
L
M
A
N
S
T
L A P A L M A A V E
YORBALINDABLVD
C R Y S T A L D R
Park Name: YORBA REGIONAL PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Proposed General Plan 0 200100 FeetPark Type: NEIGHBORHOOD
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
M
I
T
O
W
A
Y
P
H
I
L
A
D
E
L
P
H
I
A
S
T
B R O A D W A Y
C E N T E R S T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
Park Name: ANAHEIM DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY CENTERAND GYMNASIUM Taxroll Parcels
03701438
03701432
03710126
03710127
03710124
03710125
03710103
03710104
03710123
03710122
03710121
03710120
03710119
03710118
03710117
03710129
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 16080 FeetPark Type: Recreation Center
Mixed Use
Residen tial-Medium
Office-Low
GeneralCommercial
Residen tial-LowMedium
Residen tial-LowPublic-Institutional
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
M
I
T
O
W
A
Y
B R O A D W A Y
P
H
I
L
A
D
E
L
P
H
I
A
S
T
C E N T E R S T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
Park Name: ANAHEIM DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY CENTERAND GYMNASIUM Taxroll Parcels
Parks Boundary
03701438
03701432
03710126
03710127
03710124
03710125
03710103
03710104
03710123
03710122
03710121
03710120
03710119
03710118
03710117
03710129
¯Existing General Plan 0 16080 FeetPark Type: Recreation Center
Mixed Use
Residen tial-Medium
Office-Low
GeneralCommercial
Residen tial-LowMedium
Residen tial-Low
Parks
Pu blic-Institutional
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
M
I
T
O
W
A
Y
B R O A D W A Y
P
H
I
L
A
D
E
L
P
H
I
A
S
T
C E N T E R S T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
Park Name: ANAHEIM DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY CENTERAND GYMNASIUM Taxroll Parcels
Parks Boundary
03701438
03701432
03710126
03710127
03710124
03710125
03710103
03710104
03710123
03710122
03710121
03710120
03710119
03710118
03710117
03710129
¯Proposed General Plan 0 16080 FeetPark Type: Recreation Center
GENE AUTRY WAY
UN
I
O
N
S
T
APN: 23212121 Taxroll Parcels
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 13065 Feet
Mixed Use
Parks
GENE AUTRY WAY
UN
I
O
N
S
T
APN: 23212121 Taxroll Parcels
¯Existing General Plan 0 13065 Feet
Mixed Use
GENE AUTRY WAY
UN
I
O
N
S
T
APN: 23212121 Taxroll Parcels
¯Proposed General Plan 0 13065 Feet
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 3
- 1 - PC2018-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING RECLASSIFICATION NO.
2018-00311 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2018-00020)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning
Commission") did receive a City-initiated petition to rezone or reclassify all City-owned park
properties in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as depicted on the
maps attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference from existing zones
to the “PR" Public Recreation Zone, which reclassifications are designated as "Reclassification
No. 2018-00311", for the purpose preserving City-owned park land for the enjoyment of
Anaheim Residents. Reclassification No. 2018-00311 is proposed in conjunction with General
Plan Amendment 2018-00519, now pending, which shall be referred to herein collectively as the
"Proposed Project"; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA
Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on April 16, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this Planning Commission determines that the Proposed
Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15060(c)(2) of
Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The Proposed Project is exempt because the
amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Code will not result in a direct or reasonably
foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The sites that staff is requesting to be
designated for "Parks" land use in the General Plan and/or reclassified in the Zoning Code to the
Public Recreational (PR) Zone are existing park sites. Therefore, the proposed action will not
result in identifying any additional or new sites as proposed or preferred park sites. Nothing in
the proposed actions commits the City to constructing specific new parks or any improvements
to existing parks. All future uses and/or park improvements will be conditioned on CEQA
compliance on a project-by-project basis pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15004(b)(2),
which will be coordinated with the existing planning, review and project approval processes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation
and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
- 2 - PC2018-***
1. The proposed reclassification of the existing City-owned park properties
from existing zones, to the "PR" Public Recreation Zone is consistent with the General Plan's
Parks land use designation for the subject sites.
2. The proposed reclassification of City-owned park properties is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the subject sites and is compatible
with the surrounding uses.
3. The proposed reclassification of the subject sites does properly relate to the
zone and permitted uses established in close proximity to the subject sites and to the zones and
their permitted uses generally established throughout the community.
and;
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, on the basis of the above findings and
determinations, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Reclassification No. 2018-00311
to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to rezone and
reclassify the subject sites into the "PR" Public Recreation Zone, contingent upon and subject to
approval by the City Council of General Plan Amendment 2018-00519, now pending, and that
the City Council adopt an ordinance reclassifying the Property in accordance with
Reclassification No. 2018-00311.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or
a commitment by the City to rezone, the subject sites; any such rezoning shall require an
ordinance of the City Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied
by the City Council at its sole discretion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
April 16, 2018.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 3 - PC2018-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 16, 2018, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of April, 2018.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
127404 / LM
- 4 - PC2018-***
EXHIBIT “A”
APN:35104232(City Owned)
APN: 35104233(City Owned)ESPERA
N
Z
A
R
D
YORBA LINDA BLVD
L A P A L M A A V E
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: ANAHEIM WETLANDS PARK
Park Type: Nature ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 400200 Feet
EXHIBIT "A"
T
RS-3
O-L
OS
C-G
APN:35104232(City Owned)
APN: 35104233(City Owned)ESPERA
N
Z
A
R
D
YORBA LINDA BLVD
L A P A L M A A V E
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: ANAHEIM WETLANDS PARK
Park Type: Nature ¯Existing Zoning 0 400200 Feet
T
RS-3
O-L
C-G
PR
APN:35104232(City Owned)
APN: 35104233(City Owned)ESPERA
N
Z
A
R
D
YORBA LINDA BLVD
CRYS
T
A
L
D
R
L A P A L M A A V E
Park Name: ANAHEIM WETLANDS PARK Taxroll Parcels
Parks Boundary
¯Proposed Zoning 0 400200 FeetPark Type: Nature
APN: 12821312(City Owned)
AG
A
T
E
S
T
CHATEAU AVE
CRONE AVE
NU
T
W
O
O
D
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: BARTON PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 10050 Feet
RS-2
T
APN: 12821312(City Owned)
AG
A
T
E
S
T
CHATEAU AVE
CRONE AVE
NU
T
W
O
O
D
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: BARTON PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 10050 Feet
RS-2
T
PR
APN: 12821312(City Owned)
AG
A
T
E
S
T
CHATEAU AVE
CRONE AVE
NU
T
W
O
O
D
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: BARTON PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 10050 Feet
APN: 23404101(City Owned)
APN: 23403107(City Owned)
ST
A
T
E
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
B
L
V
D
A
V
O
C
A
D
O
S
T
RE
S
E
D
A
S
T
VERMONT
A
V
E
WAGNER AVE
NO
R
D
I
C
A
S
T
HUKEE AV
E
NORMAN A
V
E
L
I
M
E
S
T
NYON AVE
W
A
Y
S
I
D
E
S
T
GARY PL
PAT PL
NYON PLTYROL PL
CORTNEY PL TURIN AVE
NORMAN PL
TYROL AV
E
ARIZONA
P
L
B
A
R
N
E
T
T
S
T
CORTNEY
W
A
Y
M
C
C
L
O
U
D
S
T
FLORIDA
P
L
CALIFORN
I
A
P
L
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: BOYSEN PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 375187.5 Feet
RM-2
RS-3
T
RM-3
RS-2
APN: 23404101(City Owned)
APN: 23403107(City Owned)
ST
A
T
E
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
B
L
V
D
A
V
O
C
A
D
O
S
T
RE
S
E
D
A
S
T
VERMONT
A
V
E
WAGNER AVE
NO
R
D
I
C
A
S
T
HUKEE AV
E
NORMAN A
V
E
L
I
M
E
S
T
NYON AVE
W
A
Y
S
I
D
E
S
T
GARY PL
PAT PL
NYON PLTYROL PL
CORTNEY PL TURIN AVE
NORMAN PL
TYROL AV
E
ARIZONA
P
L
B
A
R
N
E
T
T
S
T
CORTNEY
W
A
Y
M
C
C
L
O
U
D
S
T
FLORIDA
P
L
CALIFORN
I
A
P
L
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: BOYSEN PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing Zoning 0 375187.5 Feet
RM-2
RS-3
PR
RM-3
RS-2
T
APN: 23404101(City Owned)
APN: 23403107(City Owned)
ST
A
T
E
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
B
L
V
D
A
V
O
C
A
D
O
S
T
RE
S
E
D
A
S
T
VERMONT
A
V
E
WAGNER AVE
NO
R
D
I
C
A
S
T
HUKEE AV
E
NORMAN A
V
E
L
I
M
E
S
T
NYON AVE
W
A
Y
S
I
D
E
S
T
GARY PL
PAT PL
NYON PLTYROL PL
CORTNEY PL TURIN AVE
NORMAN PL
TYROL AV
E
ARIZONA
P
L
B
A
R
N
E
T
T
S
T
CORTNEY
W
A
Y
M
C
C
L
O
U
D
S
T
FLORIDA
P
L
CALIFORN
I
A
P
L
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: BOYSEN PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed Zoning 0 375187.5 Feet
APN: 07113037(City Owned)
APN: 07113034(City Owned)
APN: 07113033(City Owned)
APN: 07113038(City Owned)
BR
O
O
K
H
U
R
S
T
S
T
GI
L
B
E
R
T
S
T
CRESCENT AVE
VALDINA AVE
GRAMERCY AVE
AL
A
M
O
S
T
MO
R
A
G
A
S
T
G R E E N A C R E AV E
S E Q U O I A
A V E
VE
N
T
U
R
A
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: BROOKHURST PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 325162.5 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
C-G
T
PR
APN: 07113037(City Owned)
APN: 07113034(City Owned)
APN: 07113033(City Owned)
APN: 07113038(City Owned)
BR
O
O
K
H
U
R
S
T
S
T
GI
L
B
E
R
T
S
T
CRESCENT AVE
VALDINA AVE
GRAMERCY AVE
AL
A
M
O
S
T
MO
R
A
G
A
S
T
G R E E N A C R E AV E
S E Q U O I A
A V E
VE
N
T
U
R
A
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: BROOKHURST PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing Zoning 0 325162.5 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
C-G
PR
T
APN: 07113037(City Owned)
APN: 07113034(City Owned)
APN: 07113033(City Owned)
APN: 07113038(City Owned)
BR
O
O
K
H
U
R
S
T
S
T
GI
L
B
E
R
T
S
T
CRESCENT AVE
VALDINA AVE
GRAMERCY AVE
AL
A
M
O
S
T
MO
R
A
G
A
S
T
G R E E N A C R E AV E
S E Q U O I A
A V E
VE
N
T
U
R
A
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: BROOKHURST PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed Zoning 0 325162.5 Feet
APN: 36539103(City Owned)
APN: 36539105(City Owned)
APN: 36539105(City Owned)
APN: 08560134(City Owned)
APN: 08560175(City Owned)
APN: 08560174(City Owned)
APN: 08560158(City Owned)
APN: 08560173(City Owned)
T H E H I G H L A N D S
HIGHCREST DR
SER
R
A
N
O
A
V
E
M A
R G A R E T
D R
D
O
H
E
N
Y
C
T
CANYONRIMRD
M O U N T V A L E
C T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: CANYON RIM PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 250125 Feet
RS-2
RM-2
RH-3
T
RS-3
SP 87-1
APN: 36539103(City Owned)
APN: 36539105(City Owned)
APN: 36539105(City Owned)
APN: 08560134(City Owned)
APN: 08560175(City Owned)
APN: 08560174(City Owned)
APN: 08560158(City Owned)
APN: 08560173(City Owned)
T H E H I G H L A N D S
HIGHCREST DR
SER
R
A
N
O
A
V
E
M A
R G A R E T
D R
D
O
H
E
N
Y
C
T
CANYONRIMRD
M O U N T V A L E
C T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: CANYON RIM PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 250125 Feet
RS-2
RM-2
T
RS-3
SP 87-1
RH-3 PR
APN: 36539103(City Owned)
APN: 36539105(City Owned)
APN: 36539105(City Owned)
APN: 08560134(City Owned)
APN: 08560175(City Owned)
APN: 08560174(City Owned)
APN: 08560158(City Owned)
APN: 08560173(City Owned)
T H E H I G H L A N D S
HIGHCREST DR
SER
R
A
N
O
A
V
E
M A
R G A R E T
D R
D
O
H
E
N
Y
C
T
CANYONRIMRD
M O U N T V A L E
C T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: CANYON RIM PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 250125 Feet
APN: 12810101(City Owned)
BROADWAY
E L M A V E
EU
C
L
I
D
S
T
VE
L
V
A
P
L
FA
N
N
S
T
F
L
O
R
E
T
T
E
S
T
TEDMAR AVE
FA
L
C
O
N
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: CHAPARRAL PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 210105 Feet
RS-2
O-L
RS-4
T
C-G
APN: 12810101(City Owned)
BROADWAY
E L M A V E
EU
C
L
I
D
S
T
VE
L
V
A
P
L
FA
N
N
S
T
F
L
O
R
E
T
T
E
S
T
TEDMAR AVE
FA
L
C
O
N
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: CHAPARRAL PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 210105 Feet
RS-2
O-L
RS-4
PR
C-G
T
APN: 12810101(City Owned)
BROADWAY
E L M A V E
EU
C
L
I
D
S
T
VE
L
V
A
P
L
FA
N
N
S
T
F
L
O
R
E
T
T
E
S
T
TEDMAR AVE
FA
L
C
O
N
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: CHAPARRAL PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 210105 Feet
APN: 12829201(City Owned)
PARK CIR
Park Name: CIRCLE PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 4020 FeetPark Type: POCKET
RM-4
APN: 12829201(City Owned)
PARK CIR
Park Name: CIRCLE PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Existing Zoning 0 4020 FeetPark Type: POCKET
RM-4
PR
APN: 12829201(City Owned)
PARK CIR
Park Name: CIRCLE PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Proposed Zoning 0 4020 FeetPark Type: POCKET
APN: 03715015(City Owned)
APN: 03715013(City Owned)
APN: 03715011(City Owned)
APN:03715005(City Owned)
V
I
N
E
S
T
CENTER S
T
BROADWA
Y
K
R
O
E
G
E
R
S
T
A
T
C
H
I
S
O
N
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: CITRUS PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 15075 Feet
RM-2SP 90-2
RS-3
C-G
I
RM-3
RM-4
APN: 03715015(City Owned)
APN: 03715013(City Owned)
APN: 03715011(City Owned)
APN:03715005(City Owned)
V
I
N
E
S
T
CENTER S
T
BROADWA
Y
K
R
O
E
G
E
R
S
T
A
T
C
H
I
S
O
N
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: CITRUS PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 15075 Feet
RM-2
SP 90-2
RS-3
C-G
I
RM-3
RM-4
PR
APN: 03715015(City Owned)
APN:03715013(City Owned)
APN: 03715011(City Owned)
APN: 03715005(City Owned)
BROADWA
Y
V
I
N
E
S
T
CENTER S
T
K
R
O
E
G
E
R
S
T
A
T
C
H
I
S
O
N
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: CITRUS PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 15075 Feet
APN: 03712319(City Owned)
APN: 03730105(City Owned)
K
R
O
E
G
E
R
S
T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
WATER ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 5025 Feet
RM-4
RM-3
APN: 03712319(City Owned)
APN: 03730105(City Owned)
K
R
O
E
G
E
R
S
T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
WATER ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Existing Zoning 0 5025 Feet
RM-4
RM-3
PR
APN: 03712319(City Owned)
APN: 03730105(City Owned)
K
R
O
E
G
E
R
S
T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
WATER ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Proposed Zoning 0 5025 Feet
APN: 25507611(City Owned)
LINCOLN A
V
E
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY SQUARE
Park Type: Pocket ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 2512.5 Feet
RM-4
C-G
APN: 25507611(City Owned)
LINCOLN A
V
E
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COLONY SQUARE
Park Type: Pocket ¯Existing Zoning 0 2512.5 Feet
RM-4
PR
C-G
APN: 25507611(City Owned)
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: COLONY SQUARE
Park Type: Pocket ¯Proposed Zoning 0 2512.5 Feet
APN: 03627027(City Owned)
VERMONT
A
V
E
C
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
C
I
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COTTONWOOD PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 6030 Feet
RS-2
SP 92-2 T
APN: 03627027(City Owned)
VERMONT
A
V
E
C
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
C
I
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COTTONWOOD PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Existing Zoning 0 6030 Feet
SP 92-2 T
RS-2
PR
APN: 03627027(City Owned)
VERMONT
A
V
E
C
O
T
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
C
I
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: COTTONWOOD PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Proposed Zoning 0 6030 Feet
APN: 35654110(City Owned)
APN: 35652102(City Owned)
APN: 35650101(City Owned)
APN: 35657101(CityOwned)
APN: 35654106(City Owned)
APN: 35615110(City Owned)
APN: 08558130(City Owned)
APN: 08560134(City Owned)
APN: 35420118(City Owned)
APN: 35654104(City Owned)APN: 35654109(City Owned)
APN: 35638137(City Owned)
APN: 35647217(City Owned)
APN: 35615109(City Owned)
APN:35657102 (CityOwned)
APN: 08560158(City Owned)
APN: 08560173(City Owned)
APN: 35647201(City Owned)
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
N O H L RANCH
R
D
CANYONRIMRD
S E R R A N O
A V E
WEIR CANYON RD
FAIR
M
O
NTBLVD
Park Name: DEER CANYON PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 0.20.1 MilesPark Type: NATURE
O-L
RH-3
RS-2
RS-3
C-G
RM-2
RM-3
RH-2
T
OS
PR
SP 87-1
SP 88-1
SP 88-2
APN: 35654110(City Owned)
APN: 35652102(City Owned)
APN: 35650101(City Owned)
APN: 35657101(CityOwned)
APN: 35654106(City Owned)
APN: 35615110(City Owned)
APN: 08558130(City Owned)
APN: 08560134(City Owned)
APN: 35420118(City Owned)
APN: 35654104(City Owned)APN: 35654109(City Owned)
APN:35638137(City Owned)
APN: 35647217(City Owned)
APN: 35615109(City Owned)
APN:35657102 (CityOwned)
APN: 08560158(City Owned)
APN: 08560173(City Owned)
APN: 35647201(City Owned)
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
N O H L RANCH
R
D
CANYONRIMRD
S E R R A N O
A V E
WEIR CANYON RD
FAIR
M
O
NTBLVD
Park Name: DEER CANYON PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Existing Zoning 0 0.20.1 MilesPark Type: NATURE
O-L
RS-2
RS-3
C-G
RM-2
RM-3
RH-2
T
SP 88-1
OS
PR
SP 87-1
SP 88-2
RH-3
APN: 35654110(City Owned)
APN: 35652102(City Owned)
APN: 35650101(City Owned)
APN: 35657101(CityOwned)
APN: 35654106(City Owned)
APN: 35615110(City Owned)
APN: 08558130(City Owned)
APN: 08560134(City Owned)
APN: 35420118(City Owned)
APN: 35654104(City Owned)APN: 35654109(City Owned)
APN:35638137(City Owned)
APN: 35647217(City Owned)
APN: 35615109(City Owned)
APN:35657102(City Owned)
APN: 08560158(City Owned)
APN: 08560173(City Owned)
APN: 35647201(City Owned)
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
N O H L RANCH
R
D
CANYONRIMRD
S E R R A N O
A V E
WEIR CANYON RD
FAIR
M
O
NTBLVD
Park Name: DEER CANYON PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Proposed Zoning 0 0.20.1 MilesPark Type: NATURE
APN: 07078102(City Owned)
APN: 07080127(City Owned)
MA
G
N
O
L
I
A
A
V
E
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: DELPHI PARK
Park Type: Special Use ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 13065 Feet
I
APN: 07078102(City Owned)
APN: 07080127(City Owned)
MA
G
N
O
L
I
A
A
V
E
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: DELPHI PARK
Park Type: Special Use ¯Existing Zoning 0 13065 Feet
I
PR
APN: 07078102(City Owned)
APN: 07080127(City Owned)
MA
G
N
O
L
I
A
A
V
E
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: DELPHI PARK
Park Type: Special Use ¯Proposed Zoning 0 13065 Feet
APN: 26717112(City Owned)
BA
X
T
E
R
S
T
WARRENTON AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: EDISON PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 13065 Feet
RS-3
T
RM-4
APN: 26717112(City Owned)
BA
X
T
E
R
S
T
WARRENTON AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: EDISON PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 13065 Feet
RS-3
PR
RM-4
T
APN: 26717112(City Owned)
BA
X
T
E
R
S
T
WARRENTON AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: EDISON PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 13065 Feet
APN: 12945231(City Owned)
BA
Y
L
E
S
S
S
T
AUDRE DR
NI
N
T
H
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: ENERGY FIELD PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 10050 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
T
APN: 12945231(City Owned)
BA
Y
L
E
S
S
S
T
AUDRE DR
NI
N
T
H
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: ENERGY FIELD PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 10050 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
PR
T
APN: 12945231(City Owned)AUDRE DR
BA
Y
L
E
S
S
S
T
NI
N
T
H
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: ENERGY FIELD PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 10050 Feet
APN: 35825104(City Owned)
APN: 35825105(City Owned)
APN: 35825102(City Owned)
APN: 35825103(City Owned)
APN: 35825101(City Owned)
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
CAMIN
O
M
A
N
Z
A
N
O
Q
U
I
N
T
A
N
A
D
R
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
B
A
R
C
A
CIRCULO
R
O
B
E
L
A
V
E
NID
A
V
E
R
A
C
R
UZ
VIA
A
L
I
S
T
A
CALLE
P
A
N
T
A
N
O
F
AIR
M
O
N
T
BLV
D
P
A
S
E
O
D
E
J
U
A
N
CALLE
J
A
I
M
E
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
C
I
E
N
E
G
A
P A S E O L A R E D O
P
A
S
E
O
M
A
D
E
R
O
P
A
S
E
O
R
I
O
B
L
A
N
C
O
CAMIN
O
C
O
R
R
E
R
VIA R
I
B
A
Z
O
P
A
S
E
O
R
I
O
M
O
R
E
N
O
C
I
E
L
I
T
O
L
I
N
D
O
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: EUCALYPTUS PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 260130 Feet
RS-2
RS-3
C-G
T
RH-3
APN: 35825104(City Owned)
APN: 35825105(City Owned)
APN: 35825102(City Owned)
APN: 35825103(City Owned)
APN: 35825101(City Owned)
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
CAMIN
O
M
A
N
Z
A
N
O
Q
U
I
N
T
A
N
A
D
R
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
B
A
R
C
A
CIRCULO
R
O
B
E
L
A
V
E
NID
A
V
E
R
A
C
R
UZ
VIA
A
L
I
S
T
A
CALLE
P
A
N
T
A
N
O
F
AIR
M
O
N
T
BLV
D
P
A
S
E
O
D
E
J
U
A
N
CALLE
J
A
I
M
E
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
C
I
E
N
E
G
A
P A S E O L A R E D O
P
A
S
E
O
M
A
D
E
R
O
P
A
S
E
O
R
I
O
B
L
A
N
C
O
CAMIN
O
C
O
R
R
E
R
VIA R
I
B
A
Z
O
P
A
S
E
O
R
I
O
M
O
R
E
N
O
C
I
E
L
I
T
O
L
I
N
D
O
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: EUCALYPTUS PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 260130 Feet
RS-2RS-3
C-G
PR
APN: 35825104(City Owned)
APN: 35825105(City Owned)
APN: 35825102(City Owned)
APN: 35825103(City Owned)
APN: 35825101(City Owned)
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
B
A
R
C
A
Q
U
I
N
T
A
N
A
D
R
CIRCULO
R
O
B
E
L
CAMIN
O
M
A
N
Z
A
N
O
A
V
E
NID
A
V
E
R
A
C
R
U
Z
CALLE
P
A
N
T
A
N
O
VIA
A
L
I
S
T
A
CALLE
J
A
I
M
E
P
A
S
E
O
D
E
J
U
A
N
F
AIR
M
O
N
T
BLV
D
P A S E O L A R E D O
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
C
I
E
N
E
G
A
P
A
S
E
O
M
A
D
E
R
O
P
A
S
E
O
R
I
O
B
L
A
N
C
O
CAMIN
O
C
O
R
R
E
R
VIA R
I
B
A
Z
O
P
A
S
E
O
R
I
O
M
O
R
E
N
O
C
I
E
L
I
T
O
L
I
N
D
O
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: EUCALYPTUS PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 260130 Feet
APN: 25509207(City Owned)
APN: 25509205(City Owned)
APN: 25509204(City Owned)
APN: 25509206(City Owned)
W
E
S
T
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: FOUNDERS' PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 8040 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
RS-1
APN: 25509207(City Owned)
APN: 25509205(City Owned)
APN: 25509204(City Owned)
APN: 25509206(City Owned)
W
E
S
T
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: FOUNDERS' PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 8040 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
RS-1
PR
APN: 25509207(City Owned)
APN: 25509205(City Owned)
APN: 25509204(City Owned)
APN: 25509206(City Owned)
W
E
S
T
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: FOUNDERS' PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 8040 Feet
APN: 25507301(City Owned)
APN: 25507611(City Owned)
LINCOLN
A
V
E
P
H
I
L
A
D
E
L
P
H
I
A
S
T
E
M
I
L
Y
S
T
CYPRESS
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: GEORGE WASHINGTON PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 9045 Feet
T
SP 90-2C-G
RM-3
RS-3
APN: 25507301(City Owned)
APN: 25507611(City Owned)
LINCOLN
A
V
E
P
H
I
L
A
D
E
L
P
H
I
A
S
T
E
M
I
L
Y
S
T
CYPRESS
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: GEORGE WASHINGTON PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 9045 Feet
T
SP 90-2C-G
RM-3
RS-3
PR
APN: 25507301(City Owned)
P
H
I
L
A
D
E
L
P
H
I
A
S
T
E
M
I
L
Y
S
T
CYPRESS
S
T
LINCOLN A
V
E
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: GEORGE WASHINGTON PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 9045 Feet
APN: 36343102(City Owned)
S
C
O
U
T
T
R
L
IM
P
E
R
I
A
L
H
W
Y
C A M I N O P I N Z O N
NOHL RANCH RD
M O U N T A I N L O O P TRL
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: IMPERIAL PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 200100 Feet
T
RH-3
RM-3
RM-2
RS-2
APN: 36343102(City Owned)
S
C
O
U
T
T
R
L
IM
P
E
R
I
A
L
H
W
Y
C A M I N O P I N Z O N
NOHL RANCH RD
M O U N T A I N L O O P TRL
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: IMPERIAL PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 200100 Feet
T
RM-3
RM-2
RS-2
PRRH-3
APN: 36343102(City Owned)
S
C
O
U
T
T
R
L
IM
P
E
R
I
A
L
H
W
Y
C A M I N O P I N Z O N
NOHL RANCH RD
M O U N T A I N L O O P TRL
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: IMPERIAL PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 200100 Feet
APN: 27210203(City Owned)
APN: 27210201(City Owned)
APN: 27210202(City Owned)
APN: 07240002(City Owned)
A N A H E I M S H O R E S D R
LA PALMA AVE
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
S
T
MA
P
L
E
S
T
HO
L
L
Y
S
T
GLEN AVE
FALMOUTH AVE
CO
L
U
M
B
I
N
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JOHN MARSHALL PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 200100 Feet
RS-2
RM-2
RM-3
T
APN: 27210203(City Owned)
APN: 27210201(City Owned)
APN: 27210202(City Owned)
APN: 07240002(City Owned)
A N A H E I M S H O R E S D R
LA PALMA AVE
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
S
T
MA
P
L
E
S
T
HO
L
L
Y
S
T
GLEN AVE
FALMOUTH AVE
CO
L
U
M
B
I
N
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JOHN MARSHALL PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 200100 Feet
RS-2
RM-2
RM-3
PR
T
APN: 27210203(City Owned)
APN: 27210201(City Owned)
APN: 27210202(City Owned)
APN: 07240002(City Owned)
A N A H E I M S H O R E S D R
LA PALMA AVE
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
S
T
MA
P
L
E
S
T
HO
L
L
Y
S
T
GLEN AVE
FALMOUTH AVE
CO
L
U
M
B
I
N
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JOHN MARSHALL PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 200100 Feet
APN: 25350101(City Owned)
AN
N
I
K
A
S
T
GR
A
N
I
T
E
C
I
R
NYON AVE
OSHKOSH AVE
HILDA PL
SU
N
K
I
S
T
S
T
AMES AVE
VERMONT AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JUAREZ PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 17085 Feet
RS-2
RS-3 T
APN: 25350101(City Owned)
AN
N
I
K
A
S
T
GR
A
N
I
T
E
C
I
R
NYON AVE
OSHKOSH AVE
HILDA PL
SU
N
K
I
S
T
S
T
AMES AVE
VERMONT AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JUAREZ PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 17085 Feet
RS-2
RS-3
T
PR
APN: 25350101(City Owned)
AN
N
I
K
A
S
T
GR
A
N
I
T
E
C
I
R
NYON AVE
OSHKOSH AVE
HILDA PL
SU
N
K
I
S
T
S
T
AMES AVE
VERMONT AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JUAREZ PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 17085 Feet
APN: 26716203(City Owned)
APN: 26716122(City Owned)
APN: 26716210(City Owned)
PA
T
T
S
T
JULIANNA ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JULIANNA PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 5025 Feet
I
T
RM-4
APN: 26716203(City Owned)
APN: 26716122(City Owned)
APN: 26716210(City Owned)
PA
T
T
S
T
JULIANNA ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JULIANNA PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 5025 Feet
I
PR
RM-4
APN: 26716203(City Owned)
APN: 26716122(City Owned)
APN: 26716210(City Owned)
PA
T
T
S
T
JULIANNA ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: JULIANNA PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 5025 Feet
APN: 26714101(City Owned)
LA PALMA AVE
HA
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
Z
E
Y
N
S
T
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
D
I
C
K
E
L
S
T
H
E
L
E
N
A
S
T
PA
R
R
Y
A
V
E
LAPALMAPARK
WAY
JULIANNA ST
VICTOR AVE
HO
M
E
R
S
T
SW
A
N
S
T
AN
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: LA PALMA PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 240120 Feet
I
C-G
RS-2
T
RM-4
PR
RM-3
APN: 26714101(City Owned)
LA PALMA AVE
HA
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
Z
E
Y
N
S
T
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
D
I
C
K
E
L
S
T
H
E
L
E
N
A
S
T
PA
R
R
Y
A
V
E
LAPALMAPARK
WAY
JULIANNA ST
VICTOR AVE
HO
M
E
R
S
T
SW
A
N
S
T
AN
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: LA PALMA PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing Zoning 0 240120 Feet
I
C-G
RS-2
T
PR
RM-4
RM-3
APN: 26714101(City Owned)
LA PALMA AVE
HA
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
Z
E
Y
N
S
T
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
D
I
C
K
E
L
S
T
H
E
L
E
N
A
S
T
PA
R
R
Y
A
V
E
LAPALMAPARK
WAY
JULIANNA ST
VICTOR AVE
HO
M
E
R
S
T
SW
A
N
S
T
AN
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: LA PALMA PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed Zoning 0 240120 Feet
APN: 03725308(City Owned)
APN: 03725307(City Owned)
BROADWA
Y
W
A
Y
S
I
D
E
P
L
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: LINCOLN PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 13065 Feet
RS-2
TRM-4
C-G
RM-3
APN: 03725308(City Owned)
APN: 03725307(City Owned)
BROADWA
Y
W
A
Y
S
I
D
E
P
L
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: LINCOLN PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 13065 Feet
RS-2
PR
RM-4
C-G
RM-3
T
APN: 03725308(City Owned)
APN: 03725307(City Owned)
BROADWA
Y
W
A
Y
S
I
D
E
P
L
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: LINCOLN PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 13065 Feet
APN: 03620613(City Owned)
APN: 03620604(City Owned)
APN: 03620605(City Owned)
APN: 03620603(City Owned)APN: 03620602(City Owned)
APN: 03620612(City Owned)
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
ELM ST
C
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: LITTLE PEOPLE'S PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 5025 Feet
T
C-G
RM-3
RM-4
I
APN: 03620613(City Owned)
APN: 03620604(City Owned)
APN: 03620605(City Owned)
APN: 03620603(City Owned)APN: 03620602(City Owned)
APN: 03620612(City Owned)
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
ELM ST
C
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: LITTLE PEOPLE'S PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 5025 Feet
T
C-G
PR
RM-3
RM-4
I
APN: 03620613(City Owned)
APN: 03620604(City Owned)
APN: 03620605(City Owned)
APN: 03620603(City Owned)APN: 03620602(City Owned)
APN: 03620612(City Owned)
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
ELM ST
C
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: LITTLE PEOPLE'S PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 5025 Feet
APN: 08226104(City Owned)
WRIGHT CIR
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MAGNOLIA PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 4020 Feet
IAPN: 08226104(City Owned)
WRIGHT CIR
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MAGNOLIA PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Existing Zoning 0 4020 Feet
I
PR
APN: 08226104(City Owned)
WRIGHT CIR
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MAGNOLIA PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Proposed Zoning 0 4020 Feet
APN: 07304039(City Owned)
RA
L
E
I
G
H
S
T
REED AVE
RA
L
S
T
O
N
S
T
RA
V
E
N
N
A
S
T
CITR
O
N
L
N
RI
V
I
E
R
A
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MANZANITA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 19095 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
C-G
T
APN: 07304039(City Owned)
RA
L
E
I
G
H
S
T
REED AVE
RA
L
S
T
O
N
S
T
RA
V
E
N
N
A
S
T
CITR
O
N
L
N
RI
V
I
E
R
A
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MANZANITA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 19095 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
C-G
PR
APN: 07304039(City Owned)
RA
L
E
I
G
H
S
T
REED AVE
RA
L
S
T
O
N
S
T
RA
V
E
N
N
A
S
T
CITR
O
N
L
N
RI
V
I
E
R
A
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MANZANITA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 19095 Feet
APN: 12604116(City Owned)
APN: 12604117(City Owned)
MA
G
N
O
L
I
A
A
V
E
BROADWAY
ROWLAND AVE
BRIDGEPORT AVE
ORANGE AVE
SKYWOOD PL
RE
N
O
A
K
S
T
TR
O
J
A
N
S
T
SH
E
R
R
I
L
L
S
T
D O Y L E
D R
KE
N
M
O
R
E
S
T
R U N Y O N P LSHIELDS
D
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MAXWELL PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 320160 Feet
RS-2
T
RM-4
C-G
APN: 12604116(City Owned)
APN: 12604117(City Owned)
MA
G
N
O
L
I
A
A
V
E
BROADWAY
ROWLAND AVE
BRIDGEPORT AVE
ORANGE AVE
SKYWOOD PL
RE
N
O
A
K
S
T
TR
O
J
A
N
S
T
SH
E
R
R
I
L
L
S
T
D O Y L E
D R
KE
N
M
O
R
E
S
T
R U N Y O N P LSHIELDS
D
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MAXWELL PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing Zoning 0 320160 Feet
RS-2
T
RM-4
C-G
PR
APN: 12604116(City Owned)
APN: 12604117(City Owned)
MA
G
N
O
L
I
A
A
V
E
BROADWAY
ROWLAND AVE
BRIDGEPORT AVE
ORANGE AVE
SKYWOOD PL
RE
N
O
A
K
S
T
TR
O
J
A
N
S
T
SH
E
R
R
I
L
L
S
T
D O Y L E
D R
KE
N
M
O
R
E
S
T
R U N Y O N P LSHIELDS
D
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MAXWELL PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed Zoning 0 320160 Feet
APN: 34439203(City Owned)
APN: 34439204(City Owned)
S
U
N
S
H
I
N
E
W
A
Y
MIRAL
O
M
A
A
V
E
MIRALOMA WAY
F
A
S
H
I
O
N
L
N
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MIRALOMA PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 9045 Feet
RM-4
I
APN: 34439203(City Owned)
APN: 34439204(City Owned)
S
U
N
S
H
I
N
E
W
A
Y
MIRAL
O
M
A
A
V
E
MIRALOMA WAY
F
A
S
H
I
O
N
L
N
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MIRALOMA PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 9045 Feet
RM-4
I
PR
APN: 34439203(City Owned)
APN: 34439204(City Owned)
S
U
N
S
H
I
N
E
W
A
Y
MIRAL
O
M
A
A
V
E
MIRALOMA WAY
F
A
S
H
I
O
N
L
N
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MIRALOMA PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 9045 Feet
APN: 12861101(City Owned)
APN: 12834210(City Owned)
WOODWORTH RD
DA
L
L
A
S
D
R
NU
T
W
O
O
D
S
T
EM
P
I
R
E
S
T
CASTLE AVE
CHALET AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MODJESKA PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 210105 Feet
RS-2
T
RM-4
RS-3 APN: 12861101(City Owned)
APN: 12834210(City Owned)
WOODWORTH RD
DA
L
L
A
S
D
R
NU
T
W
O
O
D
S
T
EM
P
I
R
E
S
T
CASTLE AVE
CHALET AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MODJESKA PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing Zoning 0 210105 Feet
RS-2
PR
RM-4
RS-3
T
APN: 12861101(City Owned)
APN: 12834210(City Owned)
WOODWORTH RD
DA
L
L
A
S
D
R
NU
T
W
O
O
D
S
T
EM
P
I
R
E
S
T
CASTLE AVE
CHALET AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: MODJESKA PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed Zoning 0 210105 Feet
APN: 08558130(City Owned)
APN: 08558136(City Owned)
APN: 08558137(City Owned)
APN: 08558128(City Owned)
S E R R A N O A V E
Park Name: OAK CANYON NATURE CENTER Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 400200 FeetPark Type: NATURE
RS-2
RS-3
RM-3
RH-2
T
PR
APN: 08558130(City Owned)
APN: 08558136(City Owned)
APN: 08558137(City Owned)
APN: 08558128(City Owned)
S E R R A N O A V E
Park Name: OAK CANYON NATURE CENTER Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Existing Zoning 0 400200 FeetPark Type: NATURE
RS-2
RS-3
RM-3
RH-2
PR
T
APN: 08558130(City Owned)
APN: 08558136(City Owned)
APN: 08558137(City Owned)
APN: 08558128(City Owned)
L
O
Y
O
L
A
D
R
G
R
I
N
N
E
L
L
S
T
S E R R A N O A V E
C
A
L
L
E
V
E
N
A
D
O
CAMINO
G
R
A
N
D
E
L
E
H
I
G
H
D
R
SWARTHMO
R
E
D
R
P R I N C E T O N A V E
RUTG
E
R
S
D
R
V
A
S
S
A
R
C
I
R
K E N T U C K Y A V E
W I L L I A M S C
I
R
C
A
MIN
O
VIS
T
A
G E O R G E T O W N C I R
W
A
L
N
U
T
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: OAK CANYON NATURE CENTER
Park Type: Nature ¯Proposed Zoning 0 500250 Feet
APN: 36524101(City Owned)
NOHL RANCH RD
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: OAK PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 10050 Feet
RS-3
T
RM-3
OS
APN: 36524101(City Owned)
NOHL RANCH RD
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: OAK PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 10050 Feet
RS-3
PR
T
RM-3
OS
APN: 36524101(City Owned)
NOHL RANCH RD
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: OAK PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 10050 Feet
APN: 36138102(City Owned)
R A N C H
G A T E R D
W I N D M I L L L N
N O H L R A N C H R D
NOHL C A N Y O N R D
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: OLIVE HILLS PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 18090 Feet
RH-3
RM-2
C-G
T
APN: 36138102(City Owned)
R A N C H
G A T E R D
W I N D M I L L L N
N O H L R A N C H R D
NOHL C A N Y O N R D
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: OLIVE HILLS PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 18090 Feet
RH-3
RM-2
C-G
PR
T
APN: 36138102(City Owned)
R A N C H
G A T E R D
W I N D M I L L L N
N O H L R A N C H R D
NOHL C A N Y O N R D
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: OLIVE HILLS PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 18090 Feet
APN: 12919103(City Owned)
APN: 12917108(City Owned)
LO
A
R
A
S
T
PALAIS RD
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PALM LANE PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 13065 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
T
APN: 12919103(City Owned)
APN: 12917108(City Owned)
LO
A
R
A
S
T
PALAIS RD
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PALM LANE PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 13065 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
T
PRAPN: 12919103(City Owned)
APN: 12917108(City Owned)
LO
A
R
A
S
T
PALAIS RD
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PALM LANE PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 13065 Feet
APN: 08249214(City Owned)APN: 08249215(City Owned)
IR
I
S
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PAUL REVERE PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 3015 Feet
RM-4APN: 08249214(City Owned)APN: 08249215(City Owned)
IR
I
S
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PAUL REVERE PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Existing Zoning 0 3015 Feet
RM-4
PRAPN: 08249214(City Owned)APN: 08249215(City Owned)
IR
I
S
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PAUL REVERE PARK
Park Type: Pocket ¯Proposed Zoning 0 3015 Feet
APN: 03427001(City Owned)
SYCAMOR
E
S
T
A L B E R T A S T
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
J
A
N
S
S
S
T
H
E
L
E
N
A
S
T
CYPRESS
S
T
P
I
N
E
W
A
Y
LINCOL
N
A
V
E
C
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
E
S
T
ADELE ST
P
I
N
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PEARSON PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 250125 Feet
C-G
RS-1
RS-2
O-L
RM-4
RS-3
TAPN: 03427001(City Owned)
SYCAMOR
E
S
T
A L B E R T A S T
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
J
A
N
S
S
S
T
H
E
L
E
N
A
S
T
CYPRESS
S
T
P
I
N
E
W
A
Y
LINCOL
N
A
V
E
C
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
E
S
T
ADELE ST
P
I
N
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PEARSON PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing Zoning 0 250125 Feet
C-G
RS-1
T
RS-2
O-L
RM-4
RS-3
PRAPN: 03427001(City Owned)
SYCAMOR
E
S
T
A L B E R T A S T
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
J
A
N
S
S
S
T
H
E
L
E
N
A
S
T
CYPRESS
S
T
P
I
N
E
W
A
Y
LINCOL
N
A
V
E
C
L
E
M
E
N
T
I
N
E
S
T
ADELE ST
P
I
N
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PEARSON PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed Zoning 0 250125 Feet
APN: 36309217(City Owned)
APN: 36324231(City Owned)
APN: 36303401(City Owned)
APN: 36325101(City Owned)
A V E N I D A B E R N A R D O NORTH
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
B
E
R
N
A
R
D
O
SOUTH
T A B L E R O C K P L
HONEYWOOD LN
SUNCREST RD
A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A
CALLE CANADA
WESTRIDGE RD
SMOKERIDGE TER
WESTRIDGE CI
R
S I L V E R B R O O K
D R
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: PELANCONI PARK
Park Type: Nature ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 370185 Feet
RS-2
T
C-G
RH-3
RM-3
APN: 36309217(City Owned)
APN: 36324231(City Owned)
APN: 36303401(City Owned)
APN: 36325101(City Owned)
A V E N I D A B E R N A R D O NORTH
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
B
E
R
N
A
R
D
O
SOUTH
HONEYWOOD LN
SUNCREST RD
A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A
CALLE CANADA
WESTRIDGE RD
SMOKERIDGE TER
WESTRIDGE CI
R
S I L V E R B R O O K
D R
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: PELANCONI PARK
Park Type: Nature ¯Existing Zoning 0 370185 Feet
RS-2
PR
C-G
RH-3
RM-3
T
APN: 36309217(City Owned)
APN: 36324231(City Owned)
APN: 36303401(City Owned)
APN: 36325101(City Owned)
A V E N I D A B E R N A R D O NORTH
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
B
E
R
N
A
R
D
O
SOUTH
HONEYWOOD LN
SUNCREST RD
A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A
CALLE CANADA
WESTRIDGE RD
SMOKERIDGE TER
WESTRIDGE CI
R
S I L V E R B R O O K
D R
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: PELANCONI PARK
Park Type: Nature ¯Proposed Zoning 0 370185 Feet
APN: 35907105(City Owned)
PI
N
N
E
Y
D
R
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
BERGH DR
GERDA D
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PERALTA CANYON PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 260130 Feet
O-L
RS-2T
RH-3RH-1
APN: 35907105(City Owned)
PI
N
N
E
Y
D
R
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
BERGH DR
GERDA D
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PERALTA CANYON PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing Zoning 0 260130 Feet
O-L
RS-2
T
RH-3RH-1
PR
APN: 35907105(City Owned)
PI
N
N
E
Y
D
R
S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
BERGH DR
GERDA D
R
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PERALTA CANYON PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed Zoning 0 260130 Feet
APN: 08302055(City Owned)
APN: 08302041(City Owned)
APN: 08302036(City Owned)
APN: 08302060(City Owned)
SU
N
K
I
S
T
S
T
SH
A
K
E
S
P
E
A
R
E
S
T
MI
L
T
O
N
S
T
UNDERHILL AVE
SYCAMORE ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PIONEER PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 19095 Feet
T
RS-2
APN: 08302055(City Owned)
APN: 08302041(City Owned)
APN: 08302036(City Owned)
APN: 08302060(City Owned)
SU
N
K
I
S
T
S
T
SH
A
K
E
S
P
E
A
R
E
S
T
MI
L
T
O
N
S
T
UNDERHILL AVE
SYCAMORE ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PIONEER PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 19095 Feet
PR
RS-2
T APN: 08302055(City Owned)
APN: 08302041(City Owned)
APN: 08302036(City Owned)
APN: 08302060(City Owned)
SU
N
K
I
S
T
S
T
SH
A
K
E
S
P
E
A
R
E
S
T
MI
L
T
O
N
S
T
UNDERHILL AVE
SYCAMORE ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PIONEER PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 19095 Feet
APN: 23316111(City Owned)
APN: 13735313(City Owned)
APN: 13735314(City Owned)
ORANGEWOOD AVE
HA
S
T
E
R
S
T
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
BLUEBELL PL
V
E
R
N
S
T
BLUEBELL AVE
CLIFFWOOD AVE
WILKEN WAY
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PONDEROSA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 19095 Feet
RS-2
T
RM-4
C-G
RM-3
APN: 23316111(City Owned)
APN: 13735313(City Owned)
APN: 13735314(City Owned)
ORANGEWOOD AVE
HA
S
T
E
R
S
T
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
BLUEBELL PL
V
E
R
N
S
T
BLUEBELL AVE
CLIFFWOOD AVE
WILKEN WAY
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PONDEROSA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 19095 Feet
RS-2
PR
RM-4
RM-3
T
APN: 23316111(City Owned)
APN: 13735313(City Owned)
APN: 13735314(City Owned)
ORANGEWOOD AVE
HA
S
T
E
R
S
T
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
BLUEBELL PL
V
E
R
N
S
T
BLUEBELL AVE
CLIFFWOOD AVE
WILKEN WAY
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: PONDEROSA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 19095 Feet
APN: 26832105(City Owned)
APN: 26801314(City Owned)
DUTCH AVE
KI
N
G
S
L
E
Y
S
T
BA
R
B
A
R
A
S
T
AL
I
C
E
S
T
JE
A
N
I
N
E
W
A
Y
P A R K
V I S T A
S T
BE
T
H
C
I
R
CO
N
N
I
E
C
I
R
GREENHEDGE AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: RIO VISTA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 225112.5 Feet
RS-2
RM-2
RS-3
RM-4
T
APN: 26832105(City Owned)
APN: 26801314(City Owned)
DUTCH AVE
KI
N
G
S
L
E
Y
S
T
BA
R
B
A
R
A
S
T
AL
I
C
E
S
T
JE
A
N
I
N
E
W
A
Y
P A R K
V I S T A
S T
BE
T
H
C
I
R
CO
N
N
I
E
C
I
R
GREENHEDGE AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: RIO VISTA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 225112.5 Feet
RM-2
RS-3
RM-4
RS-2
PR
T
APN: 26832105(City Owned)
APN: 26801314(City Owned)
DUTCH AVE
KI
N
G
S
L
E
Y
S
T
BA
R
B
A
R
A
S
T
AL
I
C
E
S
T
JE
A
N
I
N
E
W
A
Y
P A R K
V I S T A
S T
BE
T
H
C
I
R
CO
N
N
I
E
C
I
R
GREENHEDGE AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: RIO VISTA PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 225112.5 Feet
APN: 35457110(City Owned)
APN: 35457111(City Owned)
APN: 35438140(City Owned)
R U N N I N G S P R I N G S D R
F
L
I
N
T
R
I
D
G
E
W
A
Y
WIN
DS
O
N
GDR
P A R K G L E N P L
B I R C H T R E E LN
L A D Y F E R N L N
WEIR
CANYON
R
D
A L P I N E C T
SUNNYWALK LN
BRIARROSE LN
S
E
D
O
N
A
L
N
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: RONALD REAGAN PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 330165 Feet
SP 88-1
SP 88-2
APN: 35457110(City Owned)
APN: 35457111(City Owned)
APN: 35438140(City Owned)
R U N N I N G S P R I N G S D R
F
L
I
N
T
R
I
D
G
E
W
A
Y
WIN
DS
O
N
GDR
P A R K G L E N P L
B I R C H T R E E LN
L A D Y F E R N L N
WEIR
CANYON
R
D
A L P I N E C T
SUNNYWALK LN
BRIARROSE LN
S
E
D
O
N
A
L
N
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: RONALD REAGAN PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing Zoning 0 330165 Feet
SP 88-1
SP 88-2
PR
APN: 35457110(City Owned)
APN: 35457111(City Owned)
APN: 35438140(City Owned)
R U N N I N G S P R I N G S D R
F
L
I
N
T
R
I
D
G
E
W
A
Y
WIN
DS
O
N
GDR
P A R K G L E N P L
B I R C H T R E E LN
L A D Y F E R N L N
WEIR
CANYON
R
D
A L P I N E C T
SUNNYWALK LN
BRIARROSE LN
S
E
D
O
N
A
L
N
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: RONALD REAGAN PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed Zoning 0 330165 Feet
APN: 35416119(City Owned)
C A R N A T I O N W A Y
M
O
N
T
E
V
I
S
T
A
R
D
B A U E R R D
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: ROOSEVELT PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 8040 Feet
O-L
RS-3
T
SP 90-1
APN: 35416119(City Owned)
C A R N A T I O N W A Y
M
O
N
T
E
V
I
S
T
A
R
D
B A U E R R D
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: ROOSEVELT PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 8040 Feet
O-L
RS-3
PR
SP 90-1
APN: 35416119(City Owned)
C A R N A T I O N W A Y
M
O
N
T
E
V
I
S
T
A
R
D
B A U E R R D
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: ROOSEVELT PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 8040 Feet
APN: 03404265(City Owned)
APN: 03405354(City Owned)
W
E
S
T
S
T
C L A R E D G E D R
L
O
M
I
T
A
S
T
YVONNE PL
LI
D
O
L
N
LA
G
U
N
A
S
T
HE
R
M
O
S
A
D
R
R E D O N D O
D R
LA E N T R A D A C I R
LIDO PL
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: SAGE PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 230115 Feet
RM-4
RS-1
RS-3
C-G
RM-3
RS-2
APN: 03404265(City Owned)
APN: 03405354(City Owned)
W
E
S
T
S
T
C L A R E D G E D R
L
O
M
I
T
A
S
T
YVONNE PL
LI
D
O
L
N
LA
G
U
N
A
S
T
HE
R
M
O
S
A
D
R
R E D O N D O
D R
LA E N T R A D A C I R
LIDO PL
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: SAGE PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 230115 Feet
RM-4
RS-1
C-G
RM-3
RS-2
PR
APN: 03404265(City Owned)
APN: 03405354(City Owned)
C L A R E D G E D R
L
O
M
I
T
A
S
T
LI
D
O
L
N
YVONNE PL
LA
G
U
N
A
S
T
HE
R
M
O
S
A
D
R
RE
D
O
N
D
O
D
R
LA E N T R A D A C I R
W
E
S
T
S
T
LIDO PL
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: SAGE PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 240120 Feet
APN: 12601219(City Owned)
B E L
A I R
S T
BR
O
D
E
R
S
T
RI
D
G
E
W
A
Y
S
T
BAYWOOD AVE
ACADEMY AVE
FLOY
D
A
V
E
LA
X
O
R
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: SCHWEITZER PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 18090 Feet
RS-2
T
RM-4
APN: 12601219(City Owned)
B E L
A I R
S T
BR
O
D
E
R
S
T
RI
D
G
E
W
A
Y
S
T
BAYWOOD AVE
ACADEMY AVE
FLOY
D
A
V
E
LA
X
O
R
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: SCHWEITZER PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 18090 Feet
RS-2
T
RM-4
PR
APN: 12601219(City Owned)
B E L
A I R
S T
RI
D
G
E
W
A
Y
S
T
BAYWOOD AVE
ACADEMY AVE
FLOY
D
A
V
E
LA
X
O
R
E
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: SCHWEITZER PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 19095 Feet
APN: 09062209(City Owned)
APN: 09001104(City Owned)
APN: 09058119(City Owned)
APN: 09001103(City Owned)
NI
N
T
H
S
T
WAKEFIELD AVE
MA
R
G
I
E
L
N
GA
I
L
L
N
NE
V
I
S
C
T
WA
V
E
R
L
Y
D
R
FLIPPEN WAY
FLI
P
P
E
N
D
R
EIL
E
E
N
D
R
BA
Y
L
E
S
S
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: STODDARD PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 230115 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
C-G
T
APN: 09062209(City Owned)
APN: 09001104(City Owned)
APN: 09058119(City Owned)
APN: 09001103(City Owned)
NI
N
T
H
S
T
WAKEFIELD AVE
MA
R
G
I
E
L
N
GA
I
L
L
N
NE
V
I
S
C
T
WA
V
E
R
L
Y
D
R
FLIPPEN WAY
FLI
P
P
E
N
D
R
EIL
E
E
N
D
R
BA
Y
L
E
S
S
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: STODDARD PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 230115 Feet
RS-2
RM-4
C-G
PR
T
APN: 09062209(City Owned)
APN: 09001104(City Owned)
APN: 09058119(City Owned)
APN: 09001103(City Owned)
NI
N
T
H
S
T
WAKEFIELD AVE
MA
R
G
I
E
L
N
GA
I
L
L
N
NE
V
I
S
C
T
WA
V
E
R
L
Y
D
R
FLIPPEN WAY
FLI
P
P
E
N
D
R
EIL
E
E
N
D
R
BA
Y
L
E
S
S
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: STODDARD PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 230115 Feet
APN: 35410201(City Owned)
APN: 35420118(City Owned)APN: 35420123(City Owned)
MONTE VIS
T
A
R
D
K E N N E D Y R D
BAUER
R
D
O L D
S P R I N G S
R
D
D
R
E
A
M
S
T
CARNA
T
I
O
N
W
A
Y
BASIL
ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: SYCAMORE PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 225112.5 Feet
O-L
C-G
T
RS-3
SP 88-1
APN: 35410201(City Owned)
APN: 35420118(City Owned)APN: 35420123(City Owned)
MONTE VIS
T
A
R
D
K E N N E D Y R D
BAUER
R
D
O L D
S P R I N G S
R
D
D
R
E
A
M
S
T
CARNA
T
I
O
N
W
A
Y
BASIL
ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: SYCAMORE PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 225112.5 Feet
O-L
C-G
T
RS-3
SP 88-1
PR
APN: 35410201(City Owned)
APN: 35420118(City Owned)APN: 35420123(City Owned)
MONTE VIS
T
A
R
D
K E N N E D Y R D
BAUER
R
D
O L D
S P R I N G S
R
D
D
R
E
A
M
S
T
CARNA
T
I
O
N
W
A
Y
BASIL
ST
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: SYCAMORE PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 225112.5 Feet
APN: 07991417(City Owned)
APN: 07915005(City Owned)
WE
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
E
HA
Y
W
A
R
D
S
T
WESTH
A
V
E
N
D
R
PA
R
K
V
I
E
W
S
T
ORANGE AVE
WE
S
T
H
A
V
E
N
C
I
R
STONYBROOK DR
HA
L
L
I
D
A
Y
S
T
ROME AVE
BRIDGEPORT AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: TWILA REID PARK
Park Type: Community ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 330165 Feet
RM-2
C-G
RS-2
RS-4
RS-3
T
RM-4
O-L
APN: 07991417(City Owned)
APN: 07915005(City Owned)
WE
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
E
HA
Y
W
A
R
D
S
T
WESTH
A
V
E
N
D
R
PA
R
K
V
I
E
W
S
T
ORANGE AVE
WE
S
T
H
A
V
E
N
C
I
R
STONYBROOK DR
HA
L
L
I
D
A
Y
S
T
ROME AVE
BRIDGEPORT AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: TWILA REID PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Existing Zoning 0 330165 Feet
RM-2
C-G
RS-2
RS-4
RS-3
PR
RM-4
O-L
T
APN: 07991417(City Owned)
APN: 07915005(City Owned)
WE
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
E
HA
Y
W
A
R
D
S
T
WESTH
A
V
E
N
D
R
PA
R
K
V
I
E
W
S
T
ORANGE AVE
WE
S
T
H
A
V
E
N
C
I
R
STONYBROOK DR
HA
L
L
I
D
A
Y
S
T
ROME AVE
BRIDGEPORT AVE
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: TWILA REID PARK
Park Type: Community ¯Proposed Zoning 0 330165 Feet
SE
R
R
A
N
O
A
V
E
CANYONRIMRD
CO
L
U
M
B
U
S
D
R
DR
A
K
E
D
R
JOLIE
T
C
I
R
LIVIN
G
S
T
O
N
W
A
Y
PEA
R
Y
W
A
Y
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: WALNUT CANYON PARK
Park Type: Special Use ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 210105 Feet
APN: 36539201 (City Owned)
RS-2
RM-2
T
RS-3
RM-3
SP 87-1
SE
R
R
A
N
O
A
V
E
CANYONRIMRD
CO
L
U
M
B
U
S
D
R
DR
A
K
E
D
R
JOLIE
T
C
I
R
LIVIN
G
S
T
O
N
W
A
Y
PEA
R
Y
W
A
Y
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: WALNUT CANYON PARK
Park Type: Special Use ¯Existing Zoning 0 210105 Feet
APN: 36539201 (City Owned)
RS-2
RM-2
PR
RS-3
RM-3
T
SE
R
R
A
N
O
A
V
E
CANYONRIMRD
CO
L
U
M
B
U
S
D
R
DR
A
K
E
D
R
JOLIE
T
C
I
R
LIVIN
G
S
T
O
N
W
A
Y
PEA
R
Y
W
A
Y
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: WALNUT CANYON PARK
Park Type: Special Use ¯Proposed Zoning 0 210105 Feet
APN: 36539201 (City Owned)
APN: 23417120(City Owned)
VERMONT
A
V
E
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: WALNUT GROVE PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 11055 Feet
RS-2
T
RM-3
RM-4
C-G
APN: 23417120(City Owned)
VERMONT
A
V
E
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: WALNUT GROVE PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Existing Zoning 0 11055 Feet
RS-2
T
C-G
RM-4
PR APN: 23417120(City Owned)
VERMONT
A
V
E
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
L
E
M
O
N
S
T
Taxroll Parcels
Parks BoundaryPark Name: WALNUT GROVE PARK
Park Type: Mini ¯Proposed Zoning 0 11055 Feet
APN: 25008219(City Owned)
APN: 25008218(City Owned)
BRAND
E
A
V
E
LO
A
R
A
S
T
AR
D
E
N
S
T
CRONE AVE
RICHARD PL
AL
V
Y
S
T
ALOMAR AVE
SO
N
Y
A
P
L
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: WILLOW PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯May 2017 Aerial 0 15075 Feet
RS-2
T
APN: 25008219(City Owned)
APN: 25008218(City Owned)
BRAND
E
A
V
E
LO
A
R
A
S
T
AR
D
E
N
S
T
CRONE AVE
RICHARD PL
AL
V
Y
S
T
ALOMAR AVE
SO
N
Y
A
P
L
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: WILLOW PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Existing Zoning 0 15075 Feet
RS-2
T
PR
APN: 25008219(City Owned)
APN: 25008218(City Owned)
BRAND
E
A
V
E
LO
A
R
A
S
T
AR
D
E
N
S
T
CRONE AVE
RICHARD PL
AL
V
Y
S
T
ALOMAR AVE
SO
N
Y
A
P
L
Taxroll Parcels
Park BoundaryPark Name: WILLOW PARK
Park Type: Neighborhood ¯Proposed Zoning 0 15075 Feet
APN: 35104229(City Owned)
P
U
L
L
M
A
N
S
T
L A P A L M A A V E
YORBA LINDA BLVD
C R Y S T A L D R
Park Name: YORBA REGIONAL PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 200100 FeetPark Type: NEIGHBORHOOD
T
RS-3
C-G
I
O-L
OS
APN: 35104229(City Owned)
P
U
L
L
M
A
N
S
T
L A P A L M A A V E
YORBA LINDA BLVD
C R Y S T A L D R
Park Name: YORBA REGIONAL PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Existing Zoning 0 200100 FeetPark Type: NEIGHBORHOOD
C-G
T
RS-3
PR
I
O-L
APN: 35104229(City Owned)
P
U
L
L
M
A
N
S
T
L A P A L M A A V E
YORBA LINDA BLVD
C R Y S T A L D R
Park Name: YORBA REGIONAL PARK Taxroll Parcels
Park Boundary
¯Proposed Zoning 0 200100 FeetPark Type: NEIGHBORHOOD
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
M
I
T
O
W
A
Y
P
H
I
L
A
D
E
L
P
H
I
A
S
T
BROADWA
Y
CENTER S
T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
Park Name: ANAHEIM DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY CENTERAND GYMNASIUM Taxroll Parcels
03701438
03701432
03710126
03710127
03710124
03710125
03710103
03710104
03710123
03710122
03710121
03710120
03710119
03710118
03710117
03710129
¯May 2017 Aerial 0 16080 FeetPark Type: Recreation Center
O-L
T
C-G
SP 90-2
RS-3
RM-4
RM-3
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
M
I
T
O
W
A
Y
P
H
I
L
A
D
E
L
P
H
I
A
S
T
BROADWA
Y
CENTER S
T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
Park Name: ANAHEIM DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY CENTERAND GYMNASIUM Taxroll Parcels
03701438
03701432
03710126
03710127
03710124
03710125
03710103
03710104
03710123
03710122
03710121
03710120
03710119
03710118
03710117
03710129
¯Existing Zoning 0 16080 FeetPark Type: Recreation Center
O-L
C-G
SP 90-2
RS-3
RM-4
PR
RM-3
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
M
I
T
O
W
A
Y
P
H
I
L
A
D
E
L
P
H
I
A
S
T
BROADWA
Y
CENTER S
T
M
E
L
R
O
S
E
S
T
Park Name: ANAHEIM DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY CENTERAND GYMNASIUM Taxroll Parcels
03701438
03701432
03710126
03710127
03710124
03710125
03710103
03710104
03710123
03710122
03710121
03710120
03710119
03710118
03710117
03710129
¯Proposed Zoning 0 16080 FeetPark Type: Recreation Center
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.