1965/03/04IM, TE:
PI&.C E:
PRESIDING
OFFICER:
MINUTES
ANAHEIM STADIUM COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Thursday, March 4, 1965 - 1:30 P. M.
Anaheim City Hall, City Council Conference Room
Rector L. Coons, Shairman
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Coons.
ROLL CALL:
Pre se nt:
AL~.O ..PRESENT
Rector L. Coons
Charles Currier
Dick Glover
Paul Hughes
Harry Knisely
Absent:
Thomas Fo Liegler, Stadium Manager
Alan Watts, Deouty City Attorney
Joe Conner, Anaheim Drag Raceway
Jack Boettner, Los Angeles Times
Phil Hanf, Anaheim Bulletin
None
Chairman Coons introduced the recently appointed Stadium and Convention Manager,
Mr. Thomas F. Liegler, to the Commissioners and told them that Mr. Liegler was
Assistant Business Manager of the Houston Colt 45's for the past three years.
During his tenure there he was instrumental in the designing and engineering of
the Houston Dome and also assisted in the planning of the Convention Center in
Houston. Chairman Coons advised the Commission that Mr. Liegler's capacity is
that of a Department Head and all matters pertinent to the Stadium and Convention
Center will be channeled through his office to the Commission.
Mr. L&egler stated that he is looking forward to the challenge in Anaheim and
working with the City Council and Stadium Commission in making the Anaheim
Stadium the finest in the country. His office at 2000 State College Boulevard
will be temporarily in the trailer there until facilities are available in the
Stadium.
Anaheim Drag Raceway Proposal
Mr. Conner continued with his presentation of the Anaheim Drag Raceway proposal
by explaining certain additional gratuities to the area in the event the drag
strip is accepted° Among thes~ he said, were several charity races to be run
each year for the purpose of building up public relations in regard to automoOzze
racing. The five charities to be benefited would be decided by a Board of
Directors consisting of local prominent people selected for this sole purpose.
Attendance at these major events is expected to fill the parking lot to capacity.
Anaheim Stadium Commission ~[inutes March 4, 1965
Anaheim Dra Racewa Pro ~osal (cont)
Mr. Conner went on to explain that when drag racing started, it was for the
participants and they were charged a fee to race their cars to pay for the
necessary insurance. Now it is a spectator sport and it is felt that the pro-
posed 1/8 mile track will be more attractive to the spectators than the
1/4 mile track since they will be able to see the whole show from start to
finish. He further advised that shortly the majority of the tracks will probably
be 1/8 mile tracks because the hazards of greater speeds attained are forcing
znsurance companies to require that either the tracks be shortened or the horse-
power cut down, the latter of which would be less favorable with participants
and spectators.
According to Mro Conner, the Valet Parking figures were not included on the
proposal since this was an attractive income source added for baseball and
football and not proposed for drag racing. He added that by utilizing all the
space not occupied by concessions and restroom facilities under the grandstand,
every inch of the property could be used for parking for the Stadium, including
the drag strip itself which could be used for busses, employee parking, etc.
In regard to charging for parking for the drag races, Mr. Conner had explained
that in addition to the admission charge, there is a pit pass fee, but initial
parking per car is free at all the race tracks such as is proposed. Mr. Coons
advised him that such a policy would be unfair to other tenants and Mr. Liegler
asked Mr. Conner to what degree he anticipated attendance would change per event.
Mr. Conner replied he didn't know since it hadn't been tried, but that when
admission charges had been raised at various tracks, it was proven that for the
first two or three months the crowds dropped off. He said he would hate to
~tnstigate such a policy, however, since they intend to park the cars and have
the spectators admitted through a turnstile, the parking fee could probably be
introduced.
Mr. Liegler asked if the track intended to operate the parking a~4 concession
facilit, ies, to which Mr. Conner explained that because of the age group associated
with drag racing, they wouldn't want to be forced to have a concessionaire
assigned that would insist on enforcing his contract in respect to the sale of
alcoholic beverages. However, he did agree that his organization would be open
to negotiation on both concession and parking rights.
Mr. Conner informed the Commission that auto racing has b~nma +.he senond ~.~est
spectator sport in the United States and that they feel they can organize
auto racing in this area and edunate teenagers in the sport, giving them a place
to race their cars safely rather than on public streets. In addition, neatness
in the attire of the track officials and employees will be emphasized, thereby
setting a good example. Cheating of participants is kept to a minimum by rigid
penalties imposed by the American Hot Rod Association for infractions of rules.
Ir, ~espect to the noise factor, Mr. Conner advised that the services of Redel, Inc.
had been employed to take sound tests the previous week in the residential area
surrounding the drag strip in Long Beach and the only sound obtained was that
of the normal background noises. He said that in contrast to oval track racing,
there is no noise in the pits due to warming up since gasoline for the dragsters
costs $25 to run 1/~ mile so the cars are pushed to the starting line to conserve
fuel. During the race the most cars to be raced at one time would be four, with
one to two engines each, for only a few seconds. In Mr. Conner's opinion, noise
was no factor due to the natural sound barriers surrounding the proposed track site.
Anaheim Stadium Commission Minutes March 4, 1965
Anaheim Drag Racew~a.y_proo~ (cont)
In conclusion, Mr. Conner stated that although the money committed for the
promotion of the AnaheLm Drag Raceway is available now, he doubted if it would
be if they had to wait until the completion of the Stadium to get the track
into operation. He advised that ~e City ~f Anaheim could receive a substantial
return b~ween now ar~ April, 1,966 by constructi~g the drag strip as soon as
possible. Chairman Coons agreed that Mr. Co~er had a good point, however, the
complications and problems of insurance, hazards, interference with construction,
etc. would have %o be thoroughly studied before such a determination could be
made.
Mr. Conner ar~uounced that the President of the American Hot Rod Association,
an attorney in 'Kansas City, would be present next week to answer any additional
q~estions the Commissioners might have and left the meeting at this time.
The Commissionconcurred that, the Anaheim Drag Raceway proposal ?~d very good
possibili',;ies an~ requested Mr. Liegler to investigate the problems involved
in the track's construction and operatlon during the completion of the Stadium.
The Commission discussed going to the winter nationals of the Hot ROd Association
being held near Bakersfield on Sunday, March 7, 1965. Commissioners Coons,
Currier and Knisely said that they would try to attend this event and report
bac~ on their observations.
GommLssi. oner Currier left, ~he meeting at this time to attend another scheduled
meeting.
Concession Contract
Mr. ALan Watts, Deputy City Attorney advised the Commission that he had received
more pressure from the Ministerial Association about the hawking of beer, in the
stands. Discussion ensued wherein it was pointed out that beer is vended in the
stands at all but one of the major league stadiums. The consensus was that there
is sufficient built=in control in the concession contract through the Angels,
the Commission, the fans az~ the Concessionaire, whose liquor license would be
subject to revocation and who probably would not even open the stands or hawk
beer in sections containing large youth groups if notified in advance. Mr. Liegler
pointed ou~ that the problem is not the vending in the stands, but rather the
after.th of a person drinking too much beer, over which the Concessionaire has
no control.
Therefore, it was felt that the Concessionaire should not be prohibited by
his contract to hawk beer in the stands and the following motion was made by
Commissioner Hughes, seconded by Commissioner Knisely, and carried:
MOTION
The Stadium Commission recommends to the City Council that the concession
contract with Automatic Canteen not prevent the hawking of beer in the
grandstands.
Due to other scheduled meetings, Commissioner Glover a~ Mr. Liegler left the
meeting at this time.
Anaheim Stadium Commission Minutes March 4, 1965
Concession Contrac~
Mr. Watts announced that he planned to present the amended Concession Agreement
to the City Council on Tuesday, March 9, 1965, for approval. Commissioner Hughes
made the following motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Knisely and carred:
MOTION:
The Stadium Commission recommends to the City Council that the amer~ded draft
of the A~or~atz~ Canteen Concession Agreement be approved per attached copy.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:30 P. Mo
Respectfully submitted,
Betty ~. Wilson, Secretary