PC 2018/08/20 - 11 - PC2018 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
21 Owner shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the
water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line in
accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering
Division requirements.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
22 Curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red to prohibit parallel
parking in the drive aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled
on building plans.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
23 Ongoing during project operation, refueling tanker trailers shall not block
any portion of the public right of way.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
24 Managers/Owners shall call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage
Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs
Program) Training for themselves and register employees. The contact
number is 714-558-4101.
Police Department
25 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type,
including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or
indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of
alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall
constitute a violation of this condition.
Police Department
26 The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total
display area in a building.
Police Department
27 Sales of alcoholic beverages shall be made to customers only when the
customer is in the building.
Police Department
28 The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the
consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these
premises.
Police Department
29 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area
under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within
24 hours of being applied.
Police Department
30 Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to
prevent the loitering of persons around the premises.
Police Department
- 12 - PC2018 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
31 There shall be no amusement machines or video game devices
maintained upon the premises at any time.
Police Department
32 The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the
area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted.
Police Department
33 No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building
or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building.
Police Department
34 The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with lighting of
sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance
and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot. Additionally, the
position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of
any neighboring residences.
Police Department
35 The Petitioner(s) shall post and maintain a professional quality sign
facing the premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows:
NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING
NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST
The sign shall be at least two feet square with two inch block lettering.
The sign shall be in English and Spanish.
Police Department
GENERAL
36 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and
existing water facilities (e.g. service laterals, meters, meter boxes,
backflow devices, etc.):
• 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power
poles, street lights, and trees.
• 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other
utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground
facilities.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
- 13 - PC2018 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
37 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and
its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to
individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims,
actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this
permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or
made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or
validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s
indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages,
fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of
suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and
other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in
connection with such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
38 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing
of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the
final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project,
whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in
the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the
approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
39 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and
which plans are on file with the Planning Department.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
22485 La Palma Avenue #202
Yorba Linda, CA 92887
Tel: (714) 920-9643
Fax: (714) 917-0250
www.cjccorp.com
Project Description
________________________________________________________________________
Date:April 27, 2017
Project Address:76 Station / 7-11 Convenience Store
206 S. Euclid Street
Anaheim, CA.
Project Description:
Demolition of the existing gas station with snack/mechanic shop building and
development of property new state of the art service station which, will provide a variety
of services to consumers within the City of Anaheim residence, businesses and visitors.
This Service station offers a 2,400 square foot 7-11 Convenience Store with a sale of
ancillary food such as coffee, prepackaged and prepared pastries, candies, soft drinks,
beer, wine, etc.,typically offered at convenient stores.In addition,7-11 C-Store offers
hot dogs,hamburger, pizza and other sandwiches which are prepared at the facility “TO
GO” food.
The facility will provide unleaded fuel to cars through six (6) fueling dispensers under
canopy at the center of the lot for vehicles. Fueling hours of operation are 24 hrs/day 365
days/year.
The Convenience Store will have a Minimum of 2 employees at each shift and will
operate 24 hours a day,365 days a year.Beer and wine will be sold from 6:00 am to 2:00
am daily or as approved by the City of Anaheim and Alcoholic Beverage Control.
Site Design
The site has been designed to create smooth traffic flow throughout the facility. There
are (2)modified existing ingress/egress to the site from Euclid Street and Broadway.
Two existing ingress/egress points closest to intersection will be eliminated.The fueling
canopy/islands have been placed in an angle for the traffic to be able to make an easy
access to the fueling dispensers.
The existing underground tanks are to remain in place and are located such that the tanker
trucks will be able to enter the site from Broadway access and exit into Euclid Street
egress by dropping fuel to underground tank fills on the right hand side of the truck.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
22485 La Palma Avenue #202
Yorba Linda, CA 92887
Tel: (714) 920-9643
Fax: (714) 917-0250
www.cjccorp.com
The fuel delivery is typically scheduled at the least active time of business. The tanks
will have a capacity of 40,000 gallons of fuel, of which 20,000 gallon will be dedicated to
the most demanding fuel (Unleaded 87),10,000 gallons to Unleaded 91 and 10,000
gallons to Diesel.This volume will reduce the amount of fuel delivery to the site, as well
as provide enough fuel inside the underground tanks to allow fuel delivery during the
least demanding time of the day.
The applicant has explored a variety of layouts as to the placement of the building and
fueling islands and have determined that this layout will provide the best flow of traffic
and circulation
Currently there are 12 parking spaces that are being proposed along with 12 fueling
spaces at the dispenser islands.Pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code,one space must be
provided for every 250 sq. ft.of gross floor area for retail facilities therefore 12 spaces
are required.
Architecture
The 7-11 C-Store building architecture has been designed to complement adjacent
businesses.76 / 7-11 anticipates the architecture of the building will be a tremendous
compliment to this corner property.
The architecture of the building encompasses different elevation roof line throughout the
frontage and side of the building with cornice trim and stacking stone façade columns.
The entrance of the building has been designed with a larger tower to create a grand
entrance to the building.
The canopy has also been designed to match the new proposed convenience store
building with equal architectural treatments and colors.
The colors of the building and canopy will be earth-tone colors to complement and match
the surrounding properties.
If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call.
Sincerely,
CJC Design, Inc.
Fred Cohen
Principal
22485 La Palma Avenue #202
Yorba Linda, CA 92887
Tel: (714) 920-9643
Fax: (714) 917-0250
www.cjccorp.com
Variance Justification
________________________________________________________________________
Date: April 27, 2017
Project Address: 76 Station / 7-11 Convenience Store
206 S. Euclid Street
Anaheim, CA.
Landscape setback variance is hereby requested due to the shape and lot size of the
property. City of Anaheim ordinance requires 15’-0” landscaping along the frontage
roads. Due to the additional ROW required (approximately 7’) along Euclid street,
additional landscaping will impose and undue burden on the traffic flow and circulation
of traffic throughout the site.
In addition to above city of Anaheim ordinance requires 24 inches box evergreen trees to
be placed at twenty feet on center along interior property line. The proposed building is
located on zero feet setback which is allowed however the requirement cannot be met.
Adequate landscaping and trees have been provided where possible along interior of the
property lines.
Adequate landscaping will be provided and installed to provide aesthetically pleasing
property for the corner without interrupting the traffic flow throughout the site.
We hereby request granting this variance as it has been granted through many other
facilities throughout the city of Anaheim such as Arco at corner of Brookhurst & Ball.
If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call.
Sincerely,
CJC Design, Inc.
Fred Cohen
Principal
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
4
C L
CL
CJ
C
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
I
n
c
.
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
INIT.DATEDESCRIPTIONAPP'DDATE
I
h
e
r
e
b
y
c
e
r
t
i
f
y
t
h
a
t
:
1
.
T
h
e
s
e
p
l
a
n
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
m
y
s
u
p
e
r
v
i
s
i
o
n
:
2
.
T
h
e
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
s
h
o
w
n
h
e
r
e
o
n
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
d
i
v
e
r
t
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
f
r
o
m
i
t
s
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
d
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m
c
o
u
r
s
e
o
r
o
b
s
t
r
u
c
t
t
h
e
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
o
f
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
:
S
H
E
E
T
O
F
S
I
T
E
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
:
S
C
A
L
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
D
A
T
E
E
X
P
.
D
A
T
E
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
:
O
W
N
E
R
O
R
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
:
S
O
I
L
S
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
BENCH MARK:
D
A
T
E
D
A
T
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
:
D
A
T
E
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
P
.
W
.
/
C
I
T
Y
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
D
A
T
E
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
M
A
N
A
G
E
R
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
:
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
M
A
N
A
G
E
R
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
F
O
R
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
O
N
L
Y
:
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
P
P
R
O
V
A
L
:
NO.
R
O
N
I
E
L
.
D
E
M
A
-
A
L
A
1
2
/
3
1
/
1
7
2
6
0
S
.
E
U
C
L
I
D
,
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
2
M
R
S
M
D
C
BASIS OF BEARIN
G
:
d
'
z
n
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
A
S
N
O
T
E
D
120 130 140 150E U C L I D S T R E E T
P
L
1
2
0
1
3
0
1
4
0
1
5
0
120 130 140 150
P
L
E U C L I D S T R E E TINIT.DATEDESCRIPTIONAPP'DDATE
I
h
e
r
e
b
y
c
e
r
t
i
f
y
t
h
a
t
:
1
.
T
h
e
s
e
p
l
a
n
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
m
y
s
u
p
e
r
v
i
s
i
o
n
:
2
.
T
h
e
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
s
h
o
w
n
h
e
r
e
o
n
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
d
i
v
e
r
t
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
f
r
o
m
i
t
s
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
d
o
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m
c
o
u
r
s
e
o
r
o
b
s
t
r
u
c
t
t
h
e
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
o
f
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
:
S
H
E
E
T
O
F
S
I
T
E
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
:
S
C
A
L
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
D
A
T
E
E
X
P
.
D
A
T
E
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
:
O
W
N
E
R
O
R
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
:
S
O
I
L
S
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
BENCH MARK:
D
A
T
E
D
A
T
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
:
D
A
T
E
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
P
.
W
.
/
C
I
T
Y
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
D
A
T
E
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
M
A
N
A
G
E
R
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
:
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
M
A
N
A
G
E
R
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
F
O
R
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
O
N
L
Y
:
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
P
P
R
O
V
A
L
:
NO.
USE ONLY
FOR CITY
R
O
N
I
E
L
.
D
E
M
A
-
A
L
A
1
2
/
3
1
/
1
7
2
6
0
S
.
E
U
C
L
I
D
,
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
2
M
R
S
M
D
C
BASIS OF BEARI
N
G
:
d
'
z
n
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
A
S
N
O
T
E
D
R
O
W
R
O
W
C L
CO2
CL
CJ
C
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
I
n
c
.
ELEVEN
-ELEVEN
CJ
C
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
I
n
c
.
CJ
C
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
I
n
c
.
C L
CL
CJ
C
D
e
s
i
g
n
,
I
n
c
.
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
SITE PHOTOS
Figure 1: Looking northeast from Euclid Street/Broadway intersection
Figure 2: Looking east from Euclid Street
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
Figure 3: Looking east from Euclid Street
Figure 4: Looking north from Broadway
Figure 5: Looking southwest toward intersection
Figure 6: Looking South toward Broadway
PROJECT SUMMARY
7-ELEVEN/76 GAS STATION (260 S. EUCLID ST.)
Development Standards C-G
Standards
Proposed Project
Site Area
None 0.52 acres
Building Area
N/A 2,400 sq. ft.
Floor Area Ratio
0.50 maximum 0.11
Building Height 75 feet
20’-4” Canopy
19’-6” Convenience Market
8’-6” trash enclosure cover
Landscape Setbacks:
Abutting any arterial highway
15 feet, as measured from the
ultimate highway right-of-way
line as designated on the
Circulation Element of the
General Plan
10-foot setback along Broadway
3-foot setback along Euclid St.
Structural Setbacks:
Abutting arterial highway
Same as Landscape Setback
110’ to Euclid (Market)
70’ setback to Broadway (Market)
23’-6” to Euclid (Canopy)
18’ to Broadway (Canopy)
Structural Setbacks:
Abutting Any Non-Residential Interior
Site Boundary Lines
None 0’ to east; 5’ to north
Parking 10 spaces
In Conjunction with Accessory
Retail/Convenience Store:
4 spaces per 1,000 square feet
of GFA of the convenience
store. Up to 50 percent of the
pump islands may be counted as
parking stalls.
16 spaces
9 standard spaces, 1 H/C space, plus
12 fuel pump spaces (50% can be
counted towards parking)
+ loading space
Signs
Monument
Wall
Canopy
8’ high, 80 SF
1/bldg. frontage, 20 SF ea.
1/St. frontage, 20 SF ea.
8’ high; 78 SF
1 @16 SF, 2 @12 SF
1/St. frontage @ 7.5 SF
Plan dated rec’d 5/14/18
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: AUGUST 20, 2018
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05958
LOCATION: The project site is located at 1041 and 1065 North Pacificenter Drive
and 1081 North Tustin Avenue; and, consists of approximately 14.68-acres located at
the southwest corner of Tustin Avenue and La Palma Avenue (Link OC).
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is PC
Center Acquisitions LLC and Pac Center Acquisitions II LLC, represented by Scott
Peterson. The agent for this project is Phil Schwartze of the PRS Group.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to
permit a coordinated sign program, consisting of monument signs, pylon signs, wall
signs, and a freeway-oriented sign, for a mixed-use development within the Transit
Oriented (DA-3) Area of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. SP2015-1 (ACSP).
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from
further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) under Class 11 (Accessory Structures) of the State CEQA Guidelines, and
approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05958.
BACKGROUND: The subject 14.68-acre project site is located within DA-3 of the
ACSP. The General Plan designates this property for Mixed-Use land use.
Commercial uses are located to the south and east of the project site; apartments and
industrial uses are located to the west across the Metrolink train tracks, and
commercial and industrial uses are located to the north, across La Palma Avenue.
The property is immediately adjacent to the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station.
The project site includes office and commercial uses and a parking lot for users of
the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink station.
In March 2018, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit for a
mixed-use project consisting of 406 apartments in two residential buildings and
5,000 square feet of new commercial space over four properties. The residential
component of this project includes two five-story apartment buildings that wrap
around parking structures. One building has 192 residential units and the other has
214 apartment units. The approved project also included a new 5,000 square foot
commercial building at the corner of La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue. In
addition, the applicant recently renovated the existing commercial buildings to match
the approved, but not constructed, commercial building and compliment the future
residential buildings.
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 2 of 11
PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a freeway-oriented pylon sign, monument signs,
and building wall signs within the Link OC mixed-used development. The intent of this
coordinated sign program is to unify the signs under one theme and create a cohesive
commercial and residential sign program. The following is a description of the proposed signs:
1. The applicant is proposing a corner monument sign to serve as the major brand
identification for the campus. This sign would consist of freestanding letters located at
the corner of La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue. The sign would be of aluminum
construction and illuminated with either ground mounted lights or internal illumination.
Corner Monument
2. The applicant proposes monument identification signs along both arterial street frontages
to serve as identification for tenants located deep with the mixed-use campus. The
following photo shows a mockup of this type of sign. The applicant prepared the mock-
up to demonstrate the scale and complementary design of the proposed signs.
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 3 of 11
Monument Identification Sign
3. The applicant proposes four new entry monument signs to replace the existing entry
monument signs for the Pacificenter property. The applicant is proposing vertical signs
in place of the existing horizontal signs. The applicant would install the signs on either
side of the Pacificenter Street entrances on La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue. The
photo below shows a mock-up of the proposed sign. The applicant prepared the mock-up
to provide a comparison between the existing sign and the proposed sign.
Entry Monument Sign
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 4 of 11
4. The applicant is proposing two install new tenant monument signs. These signs would
replace the existing monument signs for Taco Bell and Carl’s Jr.
Tenant Monument Sign
5. The applicant is proposing one residential tenant monument sign on La Palma Avenue
between Pacificenter Drive and the railroad. This sign design is identical to the tenant
monument signs described above and will advertise the residential building on La Palma
Avenue.
Residential Tenant Sign
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 5 of 11
6. The applicant is proposing one monument sign for the existing office building. The sign
would be located interior to the project and identify tenants in the office building. This
sign would be located at the internal Pacificenter Street intersection. The applicant would
construct the monument signs described above from an aluminum cabinet with push
through tenant names and illuminated channel letters.
Office Tenant Sign
7. The applicant is proposing one freeway oriented pylon sign adjacent to the 91 Freeway.
This sign would serve as the primary identification for the campus and increase the
visibility of the Anaheim Canyon Metrolink Station. At 53 feet high, this sign would be
the same height as the existing freeway-oriented sign for the Jerome’s Furniture business.
This sign would include five sign panels for the major tenants of the Link OC
development and Metrolink. The images below show a rendering of the sign as viewed
from the eastbound 91 Freeway and the tenant panels. The sign would include push
through illuminated tenant names and illuminated “LINK OC” channel letters.
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 6 of 11
Photo simulation of pylon sign as seen from the 91 Freeway
Pylon Sign
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 7 of 11
8. The applicant is requesting four wall signs for the two residential buildings approved
earlier this year. These signs would identify the two buildings and include the project or
building name. The signs would be internally located and include colors that complement
the building.
Residential Wall Signs
In addition to the signs described above, the applicant is also proposing wall signs for the
existing and proposed commercial buildings. The size and locations of these additional signs
would comply with the Zoning Code. Staff is recommending a condition of approval in the
attached resolution requiring the applicant to design any additional signs in substantial
conformance with the coordinated sign program. Approval of these signs will be subject to staff
approval.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit
for a coordinated sign program, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows
that all of the following conditions exist:
1) Signs shall complement the architecture of the buildings on the same property and
provide a unifying element along the streetscape; and
2) The size, scale and style of signs shall be internally consistent and consistent with the
scale of the buildings located on the same property and the surrounding land uses.
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 8 of 11
The applicant has recently renovated the commercial buildings at the Link OC campus with
cohesive architectural elements and landscape design. The applicant has proposed signs
designed with a contemporary style that is consistent with the recently renovated buildings and
the future commercial and residential buildings within the campus. The proposed coordinated
sign program would enhance the mixed-use campus by providing project identification,
improved visibility and design elements. The sign program would also provide a consistent and
cohesive design along the street and replace existing signs that are of different styles and do not
maintain a consistent theme. The following graphics and images depict the recent architectural
renovations and the complementary sign program.
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 9 of 11
The size of the monument signs are consistent with the scale of the buildings within the complex,
which will include the future five-story residential buildings. The following graphics
demonstrates the scale of the signs in relation to the buildings and includes a comparison to a
similar coordinated sign program approved in 2016 for the Axis office complex in the Platinum
Triangle.
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 10 of 11
To demonstrate that these signs would be in appropriate scale with the buildings the applicant
prepared mock-ups of the proposed signs. Staff visited the site with the applicant and sign
contractor while these signs where held in place, and observed that they were compatible with
the scale of the buildings and landscaping.
The design of the pylon sign is also in scale with the buildings and existing pylon sign on the
neighboring property.
LINK OC COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
August 20, 2018
Page 11 of 11
Environmental Review: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the
proposed project are typical of those generated within the Class 11 – Accessory Structures
Categorical Exemption. Class 11 consists of the construction or replacement of minor structures
accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities. These
structures include but are not limited to on-premises signs. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and
15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in
respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the
environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
CEQA.
CONCLUSION: The proposed signs complement the architecture of the newly renovated
commercial buildings and the approved residential buildings, and are consistent with the scale of
the surrounding buildings and signs. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
G. Scott Koehm Susan Kim
Senior Planner Principal Planner
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution
2. Link OC Sign Program
3. Letter of Justification
SP 2 015-1DEV 2018-0001 6OFFICES
SP 2 015-1DA3EXTENDEDSTAYAMERICA
SP 2 015-1DA3THE CROSSINGCONDOS132 DU
R A I L R O A D
M E T R O L I N K A N A H E I M
C A N Y O N S T A T I O N
R A I L R O A D
SP 2 015-1DA1GENERAL ELECTRICOFFICES
SP 2 015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2 015-1DA1INDUSTRIAL
SP 2015-1DA1RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA1SERVICE STATION
SP 2015-1DA3OFFICES
SP 2015-1DA3OFFICESSP 2 015-1DA3INDUSTRIAL
SP 2 015-1DA3Fast Food Re stau rant
SP 2 015-1DA3Retail SP 2015-1DA3Fast Food Restaurant
SP 2015-1DA3Retail
SP 2015-1DA3Retail
N T U S T I N A V E
E LA PALMA AVE
N
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
R
N P A C I F I C E N T E R D R
E . M I R A L O M A A V E
N
.
T
U
S
TI
N
AVE
E.R I V E R D A L E A V E
E .L A P A L M A AVE
N
.
M
I
L
L
E
R
S
T
N
.
K
R
A
E
M
E
R
B
L
V
D
E . L A P A L M A A V E
1 0 4 1 a n d 1 0 6 5 N o r t h P a c if i Ce n t e r D r iv e a n d 1 0 7 1 N o r t h T u st i n A ve n u e
D E V N o . 2 0 1 8 -0 0 0 1 6
Subject Property APN: 345-181-18345-181-05345-181-08345-181-09345-181-12345-181-03
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Ph oto :Ma y 2 01 6
N T U S T I N A V E
E LA PALMA AVE
N
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
R
N P A C I F I C E N T E R D R
E . M I R A L O M A A V E
N
.
T
U
S
TI
N
AVE
E.R I V E R D A L E A V E
E .L A P A L M A AVE
N
.
M
I
L
L
E
R
S
T
N
.
K
R
A
E
M
E
R
B
L
V
D
E . L A P A L M A A V E
1 0 4 1 a n d 1 0 6 5 N o r t h P a c if i Ce n t e r D r iv e a n d 1 0 7 1 N o r t h T u st i n A ve n u e
D E V N o . 2 0 1 8 -0 0 0 1 6
Subject Property APN: 345-181-18345-181-05345-181-08345-181-09345-181-12345-181-03
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Ph oto :Ma y 2 01 6
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2018-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05958
AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2018-00016)
(1041 AND 1065 NORTH PACIFICENTER DRIVE
AND 1081 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning
Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-
05958 to permit a coordinated sign program, consisting of monument signs, pylon signs, wall
signs, and a freeway-oriented sign, for a proposed mixed-use development, (herein referred to
as the "Proposed Project") for premises located at 1041 and 1065 North Pacificenter Drive
and 1081 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 14.68 acres in size and is currently
developed with four commercial buildings and a parking lot serving the adjacent Anaheim
Canyon Metrolink Station. The Property is located in the Transit Oriented Area (Development
Area 3) of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan (“SP 2015-1, DA 3”) and is subject to the
zoning and development standards of Chapter 18.120 Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No.
2015-1 (SP 2015-1) Zoning and Development Standards. The Anaheim General Plan
designates the Property for Mixed Use land uses; and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2018 the Anaheim Planning Commission approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05911 to permit a mixed-use project consisting of 406
apartments in two residential buildings and 5,000 square feet of new commercial space over
four properties on the Proposed Project site; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on August 20, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., and notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against
proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05958, and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to
as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to
as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the
"lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the
Proposed Project; and
- 2 - PC2018-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed
Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 11 – Accessory Structures) construction, or
replacement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial,
or institutional facilities, including but not limited to on-premises signs, and that, therefore,
pursuant to Section 15311 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a
significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-
05958, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the signs complement the architecture of the buildings on the same
property and provide a unifying element along the streetscape; and
2. The size, scale and style of signs will be internally consistent, and
consistent with the scale of the buildings located on the same property and the surrounding
land uses.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05958,
does find and determine the following facts:
1. The proposed request to permit a coordinated sign program at the Premises is
subject to a conditional use permit authorized under Section No. 18.44.055.040 of Chapter
18.44 (Signs) of the Code.
2. The proposed project, as conditioned herein, would not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be
located because the signs a will be internally consistent and complement the architecture of
the buildings within the campus;
3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to
the health and safety because the proposed signs will be internally consistent and located out
of any line-of-sight areas adjacent to the public right-of-way.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed project will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area there will
be no traffic generated by this use.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will
not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the
proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval
for the use and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
- 3 - PC2018-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff
report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there
other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission
expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after
due consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does
hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. No. 2018-05958, contingent upon and subject to
the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of
the property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05958 in order to preserve the health,
safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time
to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of
the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the
Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established
that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies
with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward
establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of
this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's
compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such
condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of
any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained,
shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes
approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any
other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or
findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance,
regulation or requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of August 20, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures
and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 4 - PC2018-***
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on August 20, 2018 by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of August, 2018.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2018-***
- 6 - PC2018-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05958
(DEV2018-00016)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING/SIGN PERMITS
1 Sign Construction Plans shall be submitted to the Building Division for
review and approval. All proposed signs, including their foundation and
overhangs, shall be placed outside of the ultimate public right-of-way
and outside of existing and proposed easements. Proposed signs shall not
block the pedestrian path of travel and shall not conflict with WQMP
BMPs nor drainage facilities.
Public Works
Department,
Development Services
Division
2 The owner/developer shall submit a copy of the Caltrans Encroachment
Permit for On-Premise Advertising Displays, Arcades, Awnings, and
Marquees (Permit Code AD) for any proposed signs visible from The 91
Riverside Freeway if required by Caltrans.
Public Works
Department,
Development Services
Division
3 For the sign to be placed on Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 99-129, the
applicant shall demonstrate compliance with all the requirements
specified on the “Limited, Non-Exclusive Easement Agreement (Entry
Monument Sign)” recorded on June 19, 2018 as Instrument No.
2018000224115 of Official Records of Orange County.
Public Works
Department,
Development Services
Division
4 The following minimum clearances shall be provided between water
facilities and proposed signs:
10 feet of clearance from existing public water mains.
10 feet of clearance from all other existing or proposed water
facilities (e.g. fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes,
backflow devices, etc.).
Public Utilities
Department,
Water Engineering
GENERAL
5 Any future signs for the mixed-use campus or individual tenants must be
in substantial conformance with the coordinated sign program. All new
signs must be reviewed and approved by Planning Department staff.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
6 Any future signs for the mixed-use campus or individual tenants that do
not comply with the Code may be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director, provided that the signs are in substantial conformance
with the coordinated sign program.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
7 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the
issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for
this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result
in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the
revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
- 7 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
8 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and
its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to
individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims,
actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this
permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or
made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or
validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s
indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages,
fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs
of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees
and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in
connection with such proceedings.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
9 The business premises shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
petitioner, which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as
conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
10 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and
its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to
individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims,
actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this
permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or
made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or
validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s
indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages,
fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs
of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees
and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in
connection with such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department;
City Attorney’s Office
11 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and
which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned
herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PROPERTY OWNER
HINES
4000 MACARTHUR BLVD STE 110
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
PROGRAM DESIGNER
JB3D
731 N. MAIN STREET
ORANGE, CA 92868
714.744.2300
714.744.8061 fax
ANAHEIM, CA • SIGN PROGRAM
(1035 - 1091 N TUSTIN AVE)
LINK OC
TU
S
T
I
N
A
V
E
LA PAL
M
A
A
V
E
ME
T
R
O
L
I
N
K
91 FRWY
06.21.18
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
I
G
N
T
Y
P
E
M
A
X
.
H
E
I
G
H
T
M
A
X
.
W
I
D
T
H
M
A
X
.
S
I
G
N
A
R
E
A
1 2 3 4.
1
4.
2
4.
3
5 6a 6b
S
I
G
N
-
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
A
G
E
1.
0
2.
0
3.
0
4.
0
4.
0
4.
0
5.
0
6.
0
6.
1
Co
r
n
e
r
M
o
n
u
m
e
n
t
Py
l
o
n
Mo
n
u
m
e
n
t
I
d
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
S
i
g
n
Se
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
S
i
g
n
Te
r
t
i
a
r
y
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
S
i
g
n
En
t
r
y
M
o
n
u
m
e
n
t
Pa
d
T
e
n
a
n
t
M
o
n
u
m
e
n
t
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
T
e
n
a
n
t
M
o
n
u
m
e
n
t
4’
-
5
”
53
’
-
0
”
20
’
-
0
”
5’
-
0
”
5’
-
0
”
3’
-
0
”
15
’
-
0
”
6’
-
3
”
6’
-
3
”
M
A
X
.
Q
U
A
N
T
I
T
Y
1 1 2
1
s
i
g
n
to
t
a
l
pe
r
t
e
n
a
n
t
’
s
st
o
r
e
el
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
4 2 1
S
I
G
N
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
Gr
o
u
n
d
Gr
o
u
n
d
Gr
o
u
n
d
On
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
On
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
On
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Gr
o
u
n
d
Gr
o
u
n
d
Gr
o
u
n
d
20
’
-
9
”
21
’
-
0
”
6’
-
6
”
Va
r
i
e
s
Va
r
i
e
s
Va
r
i
e
s
3’
-
4
”
13
’
-
0
”
13
’
-
0
”
LOGOS ALLOWED Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesPERMIT REQUIRED Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesILLUMINATIONPERMITTEDYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes Yes
92
s
q
f
t
1,
5
7
5
s
q
f
t
13
0
s
q
f
t
75
%
o
f
le
a
s
e
d
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
x
2
75
%
o
f
le
a
s
e
d
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
x
2
75
%
o
f
le
a
s
e
d
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
x
1
50
s
q
f
t
40
s
q
f
t
40
s
q
f
t
SI
G
N
A
G
E
O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
PAGE 0.1 LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
06
.
2
1
.
1
8
DESCRIPTIONSI
G
N
T
Y
P
E
MA
X
.
H
E
I
G
H
T
MA
X
.
W
I
D
T
H
MA
X
.
S
I
G
N
A
R
E
A
7
8
9
10
11
SI
G
N
-
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
A
G
E
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
Office Monument
Building Sign A
Building Sign B
Building Fin A
Building Fin B
Bike Path
Vehicle Directional
*EXISTING NON CONFORMING SIGNS TO REMAIN.
ALL NEW SIGNS TO ABIDE BY SIGN PROGRAM.
10’-4”
44’-0”
37’-0”
35’-0“
30’-0”
7’-6”
5’-8“
MA
X
.
Q
U
A
N
T
I
T
Y
1
2
2
N/A
N/A
SI
G
N
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
Ground
Building
Building
Ground
Ground
5’-8”
9’-0“
10’-0”
6’-0”
6’-0”
17“
26.5”
LO
G
O
S
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
PE
R
M
I
T
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
IL
L
U
M
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
PE
R
M
I
T
T
E
D
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
60 sqft
396 sqft
370 sqft
210 sqft
180 sqft
2.25 sqft
12 sqft
SIGNAGE OVERVIEW
PAGE 0.2
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM06.21.18
SIGN FAMILY PAGE 0.3 LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
2
.
P
Y
L
O
N
3
.
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
7.
O
F
F
I
C
E
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
6.
T
E
N
A
N
T
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
11. DIRECTIONAL
5.
E
N
T
R
Y
MO
N
U
M
E
N
T
1.
C
O
R
N
E
R
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
AP
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
H
O
M
E
S
TENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME
06
.
2
1
.
1
8
*H
O
T
E
L
&
T
R
A
I
N
PA
N
E
L
S S
UB
J
E
C
T
TO
T
B
D
T
E
R
M
S
PAGE 0.4
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
SITE RENDERING
06.21.18
PAGE 0.5
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
EXISTING ARCHITECTURE
06.21.18
UNIT
GEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN
OTISGEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN
9
1
R
I
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
F
W
Y
E
.
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
TUSTIN AVE
N
U
E
B.N.S.F R.R.
TRASH
TRASH
TRASH
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
8
'
-
6
"
T
Y
P
.
PAGE 0.6
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PLANNING
N
5
6B
6A
1.1 3.2
6A 5
2
1 CORNER MONUMENT
2 PYLON
3 MONUMENT ID
5 ENTRY MONUMENT
6A TENANT MONUMENT
6B RESIDENTIAL MONUMENT
7 OFFICE MONUMENT
8 BUILDING WALL
9 BUILDING FIN
10 BIKE PATH (locations tbd)
11 DIRECTIONAL
0 50' 100' 150'
06.21.18
UNIT
GEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN
OTISGEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN
9
1
R
I
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
F
W
Y
E
.
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
TUSTIN AVE
N
U
E
B.N.S.F R.R.
TRASH
TRASH
TRASH
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
8
'
-
6
"
T
Y
P
.
11
PAGE 0.7
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PLANNING
N 1 CORNER MONUMENT
2 PYLON
3 MONUMENT ID
5 ENTRY MONUMENT
6A TENANT MONUMENT
6B RESIDENTIAL MONUMENT
7 OFFICE MONUMENT
8 BUILDING WALL
9 BUILDING FIN
10 BIKE PATH (locations tbd)
11 DIRECTIONAL
0 50' 100' 150'
8791189
06.21.18
ST-5.1PLANNING
PAGE 0.8
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
3/32” = 1’
5’ 10’
APPROX. 93’ FROM TUSTIN CENTER LINE
06.21.18
SIGHT DISTANCE
TRIANGLE
+/-
+/-
SIDEWA
L
K
CURB
SIGN
TUSTIN
ST-5.2
PAGE 0.9
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
3/32” = 1’ APPROX. 80’ FROM TUSTIN CENTER LINE
5’ 10’
PLANNING
06.21.18
SIGHT DISTANCE
TRIANGLE
+/-
+/-
SIDEWA
L
K
CURB
SIGN
TUSTIN
PROPERT
Y
L
I
N
E
+/-
ST-5.3
PAGE 0.15
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
3/32” = 1’
5’ 10’
APPROX. 90’ FROM LA PALMA CENTER LINE
06.21.18
PLANNING
SIGHT DISTANCE
TRIANGLE
+/-
+/-
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
C
U
R
B
SIGN
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
ST-5.4
PAGE 0.16
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
3/32” = 1’
5’ 10’
APPROX. 83’ FROM LA PALMA CENTER LINE
06.21.18
PLANNING
+/-
+/-
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
C
U
R
B
SIGN
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
T
U
S
T
I
N
T
U
S
T
I
N
T
U
S
T
I
N
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
PAGE 0.19
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM06.21.18 *ALL SIGNS SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH PEDESTRIAN PATH OF TRAVEL AND RESIDE OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
PUBLIC
WORKS
= FOOTPRINT OF SIGN
(INCLUDES FOUNDATION,
FOOTING & OVERHANGS)
5.1
5.2
6A.1
3.1
1.1
3.2
5.3
6A.25.4
6B.1
GRADING PLAN
1
1
'
+
/
-
10'+/-
10'+/-
7'+/
-
17
'
+
/
-
17
'
+
/
-
2
0
'
+
/
-
20
'
+
/
-
17
'
+
/
-
7.1
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
PAGE 0.20
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PUBLIC
WORKS
*ON-PREMISE DISPLAY FALLS OUTSIDE
OF CALTRANS JURISDICTION
2.1
GRADING PLAN
*PYLON SIGN AND FOOTINGS SHOULD
RESIDE OUTSIDE OF DETENTION BASIN
BI
K
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
06.21.18
PO
W
E
R
UNI
T
OTISGEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN7'-9" CAB HEIGHT100' MAX. TRAVEL
OTISGEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN7'-9" CAB HEIGHT100' MAX. TRAVEL
19
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
8
'
-
6
"
T
Y
P
.
R
E
F
.
D
W
R
E
F
.
D
W
REF
.
DW
R
E
F
.
D
W
R
E
F
.
D
W
R
E
F
.
D
W
REF
.
DW
R
E
F
.
D
W
R
E
F
.
D
W
R
E
F
.
D
W
REF
.
DW
R
E
F
.
D
W
R
E
F
.
D
W
OTIS GEN
2
3500
L
B
/
2
0
0
F
P
M
5'-0"
P
I
T
14'-1
1
"
O
V
E
R
R
U
N
7'-9"
C
A
B
H
E
I
G
H
T
100'
M
A
X
.
T
R
A
V
E
L
REF
.
DW
RE
F
.
DW
R
E
F
.
D
W
R
E
F
.
D
W
REF.
DW
SE
T
B
A
C
K
SE
T
B
A
C
K
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
1
0
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
8
'
-
9
"
5
'
-
0
"
6
'
-
4
"
34
'
-
1
1
"
37
'
-
1
"
1
0
'
-
0
"
1
2
'
-
9
"
PL
A
Z
A
A
R
E
A
T5
T6
T4
6
'
-
4
"
34
'
-
1
1
"
37
'
-
1
"
1
0
'
-
0
"
1
2
'
-
9
"
PL
A
Z
A
A
R
E
A
1
0
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
8
'
-
9
"
5
'
-
0
"
PO
W
E
R
UNI
T
OTISGEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN7'-9" CAB HEIGHT100' MAX. TRAVEL
OTISGEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN7'-9" CAB HEIGHT100' MAX. TRAVEL
19
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
8
'
-
6
"
T
Y
P
.
R
E
F
.
D
W
REF
.
DW
17
'
-
9
"
17
'
-
9
"
1
1
'
-
2
"
10
'
-
8
"
7'-
1
"
R
E
F
.
D
W
8'
-
6
"
1
8
'
-
0
"
R
E
F
.
D
W
REF.
DW
REF.
DW
R
E
F
.
D
W
REF.
DW
COATS
L.
R
E
F
.
D
W
RE
F
.
DW
16
'
-
0
"
REF.
DW
COATS
L.
REF
.
DW
R
E
F
.
D
W
R
E
F
.
D
W
REF.
DW
RE
F
.
DW
R
E
F
.
D
W
RE
F
.
DW
OTISGEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN7'-9" CAB HEIGHT100' MAX. TRAVEL
P
O
W
E
R
U
N
I
T
OTISGEN23500 LB / 200 FPM5'-0" PIT14'-11" OVERRUN7'-9" CAB HEIGHT100' MAX. TRAVEL
DE
L
I
V
E
R
I
E
S
SU
-
3
0
T
R
U
C
K
TU
R
N
I
N
G
R
A
D
I
U
S
REF.
DW
19
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
19
'
-
0
"
1
9
'
-
0
"
2
5
'
-
0
"
8
'
-
6
"
8
'
-
6
"
6'-3"
6'-1"
5'-3"
5'-4"
18
'
-
0
"
1
5
'
-
9
"
1
1
'
-
1
0
"
1
1
'
-
1
"
8
'
-
6
"
8
'
-
6
"
8
'
-
6
"
1
8
'
-
0
"
T
Y
P
.
8'
-
6
"
TY
P
.
0N 50' 100' 150'
SCALE: 1" = 50'
9
1
R
I
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
F
W
Y
B.N.S.F R.R.
OVERALL SITE PLAN
E
.
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
TUSTIN AVE
N
U
E
PACIF
I
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
R
I
V
E
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
R
I
V
E
B.N.S.F R.R.
MOVE-IN AREASU-30 TRUCKDESIGN RADIUS
OCTA & A.R.T TRANSIT STOPSU-40 DESIGN RADIUS
NOTE: ALL PARKING SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED PERANAHEIM STANDARD DETAIL #470 & #471 WITH 4" LINESUSING WHITE OR YELLOW TRAFFIC BEARING PAINT.
EXIST. METROLINK PLATFORM
EXISTING 94,518 SQ. FT.4-STORY OFFICE BLDG.
5,000 SQ. FT.RETAIL PAD
NOTE: ALL PARKING SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED PERANAHEIM STANDARD DETAIL #470 & #471 WITH 4" LINESUSING WHITE OR YELLOW TRAFFIC BEARING PAINT.
TRASH
TRASH
TRASH
MMMM MMMMMMMM MMMMMMM MMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMM
NOTE: 'M' DESIGNATES THE SEVENTY (70)REQUIRED METROLINK PARKING STALLS.
(2) MOVE-IN AREASSU-30 TRUCKDESIGN RADIUS
RESIDENT DELIVERIESSU-30 TRUCK DESIGNRADIUS
RESIDENT DELIVERIESSU-30 TRUCK DESIGNRADIUS
EXIST.RETAIL
EXIST.RETAIL
EXIST.RETAIL
EXIST.RETAIL
EXIST.RETAIL
EXIST.RETAIL
EXIST.HOTEL
SITE A
LOT 1 - 2.475 AC
192 UNITS
SEE SHEET A-2.0 FOR MORE INFO
SITE B
LOT 2 - 2.786 AC
214 UNITS
SEE SHEET A-6.0 FOR MORE INFO
PM 87-446-1
2.46 AC
5,000 SQ. FT. RETAIL PAD
SEE SHEET R-1.0 FOR MORE INFO
LOT 3 - 4.03 AC
PM 87-446-3
1.22 AC.
LOT 4 - 1.708 AC
SEMI-TRUCK TURN STUDY
NOTE:MOVE-INS/LOADINGAREA RESERVED FORREAR ACCESSEDVEHICLES ONLY. SIDEACCESSED VEHICLESPROHIBITED.
MMM
MMMMMMM M M MM
12'X20'LOADING
LEASING
CLUB/FITNESS
M
O
V
E
-
I
N
LEASING
CLUB/FITNESS
PROPOSED MULTI-USE BIKEPATH TO BE CONSTRUCTEDBY THE LINK OC DEVELOPERPER THE AMC AND ANAHEIMCANYON SPECIFIC PLAN.
16'-0" DEDICATION FOR 12'-0"SHARED MULTI-USE PATH ATPARKING AREA
PAGE 0.21
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
6A.2
7.1
5.3
5.4
6B.1
1.1
3.1
3.2
6A.1
5.2
5.1
2.1
PUBLIC
WORKS
ALTA PLAN
06.21.18
PAGE 0.22
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM06.21.18
5.1 5.2
PUBLIC WORKS
*ALL SIGNS SHALL RESIDE A MINIMUM OF 12” BEHIND ROW
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 10’ CLEARANCE FROM PUBLIC WATER MAINS
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 5’ CLEARANCE FROM ALL OTHER EXISTING WATER FACILITIES
PAGE 0.23
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
6A.1 3.1
PUBLIC WORKS
06.21.18
*ALL SIGNS SHALL RESIDE A MINIMUM OF 12” BEHIND ROW
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 10’ CLEARANCE FROM PUBLIC WATER MAINS
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 5’ CLEARANCE FROM ALL OTHER EXISTING WATER FACILITIES
MIN. 12” BEHIND ROW
MIN. 12” BEHIND ROW
PAGE 0.24
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
1.1 3.2
PUBLIC WORKS
06.21.18
*ALL SIGNS SHALL RESIDE A MINIMUM OF 12” BEHIND ROW
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 10’ CLEARANCE FROM PUBLIC WATER MAINS
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 5’ CLEARANCE FROM ALL OTHER EXISTING WATER FACILITIES
MIN. 12” BEHIND ROW
PAGE 0.25
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
6A.2 5.3
PUBLIC WORKS
06.21.18
*ALL SIGNS SHALL RESIDE A MINIMUM OF 12” BEHIND ROW
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 10’ CLEARANCE FROM PUBLIC WATER MAINS
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 5’ CLEARANCE FROM ALL OTHER EXISTING WATER FACILITIES
MIN. 12” BEHIND ROW MIN. 12” BEHIND ROW
PAGE 0.26
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
5.4 6B.1
PUBLIC WORKS
06.21.18
*ALL SIGNS SHALL RESIDE A MINIMUM OF 12” BEHIND ROW
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 10’ CLEARANCE FROM PUBLIC WATER MAINS
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 5’ CLEARANCE FROM ALL OTHER EXISTING WATER FACILITIES
MIN. 12” BEHIND ROW
MIN. 12” BEHIND ROW
PAGE 0.27
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
7.1
PUBLIC WORKS
06.21.18
*ALL SIGNS SHALL RESIDE A MINIMUM OF 12” BEHIND ROW
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 10’ CLEARANCE FROM PUBLIC WATER MAINS
*ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A 5’ CLEARANCE FROM ALL OTHER EXISTING WATER FACILITIES
MIN. 12” BEHIND ROW
PAGE 1.0
SIGN TYPE 1
CORNER MONUMENT
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
PURPOSE To serve as identification for the shopping center.
MAXIMUM NUMBER One.
ORIENTATION Facing intersection of La Palma & Tustin Ave.
SIGN COPY Project name.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Single-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Width: 20'-9"
Height: 4'-5"
Graphic Area: 92 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Smooth, durable, non-weathering sign. All hardware shall be
of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Ground mounted up lights or internal illumination.
LOGO Permitted.
COLORS Silver, orange & dark grays.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
20'-9"
4'-5"
06.21.18
*REPLACES EXISTING
PAGE 1.1
SIGN TYPE 1
CORNER MONUMENT
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM06.21.18
AREA - EXCEEDS THE MAX BY 26 SQFT
WIDTH - EXCEEDS THE MAX BY 10’9”
HEIGHT - WITHIN THE ALLOWED
WE FEEL A MAX WIDTH OF 10’ DOES NOT ALLOW FOR
ADEQUATE IDENTIFICATION OF THE SHOPPING CENTER ON
THE CORNER OF SUCH A LARGE INTERSECTION.
FABRICATED ALUM LETTERS WITH ENGINEERED
INTERNAL STRUCTURE AS REQUIRED
PAGE 1.2
SIGN TYPE 1
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM06.21.18
PAGE 2.0SIGN TYPE 2 PYLON
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
&
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PU
R
P
O
S
E
T
o
s
e
r
v
e
a
s
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
c
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
i
t
s
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
.
MA
X
I
M
U
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
O
n
e
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
Al
o
n
g
9
1
f
r
e
e
w
a
y
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
r
a
i
n
t
r
a
c
k
s
.
OR
I
E
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
P
e
r
p
e
n
d
i
c
u
l
a
r
t
o
9
1
f
r
e
e
w
a
y
.
SI
G
N
C
O
P
Y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
a
n
d
u
p
t
o
f
o
u
r
t
e
n
a
n
t
n
a
m
e
s
.
B
r
a
n
d
n
a
m
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
f
o
w
h
i
c
h
m
a
k
e
s
s
i
g
n
a
p
p
e
a
r
t
o
b
e
a
n
a
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
e
m
e
n
t
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
®
a
n
d
T
M
a
r
e
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
SI
D
E
S
D
o
u
b
l
e
-
s
i
d
e
d
.
M
A
X
.
S
I
G
N
A
R
E
A
&
S
I
Z
E
W
i
d
t
h
:
2
1
'
-
0
"
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
5
3
-
0
"
G
r
a
p
h
i
c
A
r
e
a
:
4
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
SI
G
N
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
m
o
o
t
h
,
d
u
r
a
b
l
e
,
n
o
n
-
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
.
(
c
a
b
i
n
e
t
s
i
g
n
s
w
i
t
h
t
r
a
n
s
l
u
c
e
n
t
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
p
a
r
e
n
t
b
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
)
.
A
l
l
h
a
r
d
w
a
r
e
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
o
f
n
o
n
f
e
r
r
o
u
s
m
e
t
a
l
s
.
IL
L
U
M
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
l
y
i
l
l
u
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
i
n
a
m
a
n
n
e
r
t
h
a
t
l
i
g
h
t
s
o
n
l
y
t
h
e
s
i
g
n
c
o
p
y
.
I
l
l
u
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
i
g
n
b
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
i
s
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
s
o
a
s
n
o
t
t
o
c
a
u
s
e
g
l
a
r
e
t
o
m
o
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
.
E
x
p
o
s
e
d
n
e
o
n
a
n
d
e
x
p
o
s
e
d
r
a
c
e
w
a
y
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
n
a
m
e
b
e
f
a
c
e
-
l
i
t
a
n
d
e
d
g
e
o
f
s
i
g
n
c
a
b
i
n
e
t
t
o
b
e
l
i
t
w
i
t
h
s
o
f
t
g
l
o
w
i
n
g
l
i
g
h
t
.
LO
G
O
P
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
f
o
r
5
m
a
j
o
r
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
.
LE
T
T
E
R
S
T
Y
L
E
Ne
u
t
r
a
T
e
x
t
CO
L
O
R
S
S
i
l
v
e
r
,
o
r
a
n
g
e
,
w
h
i
t
e
&
d
a
r
k
g
r
a
y
s
.
S
e
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
e
x
a
c
t
f
i
n
i
s
h
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
.
06
.
2
1
.
1
8
*H O TEL & TRAI N PANEL S S UBJE C T TO TBD TERM S *NEW SIGN5'-6"21'-0"13'-6"
HE
I
G
H
T
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
D
F
R
O
M
T
O
P
O
F
CU
R
B
I
N
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
53
'
-
0
"
PAGE 2.1SIGN TYPE 2 PYLON
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
&
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
06
.
2
1
.
1
8
IL
L
U
M
I
N
A
T
E
D
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
L
E
T
T
E
R
S
PU
S
H
T
R
H
U
I
L
L
U
M
I
N
A
T
E
D
A
C
R
Y
L
I
C
T
E
N
A
N
T
N
A
M
E
S
RE
M
O
V
A
B
L
E
A
L
U
M
T
E
N
A
N
T
P
A
N
E
L
S
FA
B
R
I
C
A
T
E
D
A
L
U
M
C
A
B
I
N
E
T
W
I
T
H
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
E
D
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
A
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
PAGE 2.2SIGN TYPE 2 PYLON SITE STUDY LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
S I G NA
G
E
W
I
T
H
I
N
C
L
OS
E
P
R
O XI
M
I
T
Y
O
F
P
R
O P
OS
ED
P
Y
L
ON
06
.
2
1
.
1
8
80
0
’
+
/
-
WE
S
T
B
O
U
N
D
1,
4
0
0
’
+
/
-
EA
S
T
B
O
U
N
D
PAGE 2.3SIGN TYPE 2 PYLON SIGHT DIAGRAM LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
06
.
2
1
.
1
8
5’+/-48'-0"+/-EXISTING PYLON
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
Y
L
O
N
91
F
R
E
E
W
A
Y
NE
W
P
Y
L
O
N
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
H
E
I
G
H
T
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
1”
=
3
0
’
PAGE 2.4SIGN TYPE 2 PYLON NIGHT WESTBOUND LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
06
.
2
1
.
1
8
PAGE 2.5SIGN TYPE 2 PYLON DAY EASTBOUND LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
06
.
2
1
.
1
8
PAGE 3.0
SIGN TYPE 3
MONUMENT ID
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PURPOSE To serve as identification for the shopping center and
its tenants.
MAXIMUM NUMBER Two
LOCATION Qty 1 along Tustin Ave & La Palma Ave.
ORIENTATION Perpendicular to street.
SIGN COPY Project Name and up to five tenant names.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Double-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Width: 6'-6"
Height: 20’-0"
Graphic Area: 80 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Smooth, durable, non-weathering sign. (cabinet signs with
translucent or transparent backgrounds are not permitted). All
hardware shall be of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Internally illuminated in a manner that lights only the sign copy.
Illumination of sign background is prohibited. Lighting shall be
designed so as not to cause glare to motorists. Exposed neon and
exposed raceways are prohibited. Project name be face-lit and
edge of sign cabinet to be lit with soft glowing light.
LOGO Tenant logos not permitted.
LETTERSTYLE Neutra Text
COLORS Silver, orange, white & dark grays.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
6'-6"
6'-4"
2'-5"
20’-0"
*NEW SIGN
06.21.18
AREA - EXCEEDS THE MAX BY 70 SQFT
WIDTH - WITHIN THE ALLOWED
HEIGHT - EXCEEDS THE MAX BY 12’
WE FEEL THE MAX HEIGHT OF 8’ DOES
NOT ALLOW ADEQUATE DISPLAY AREA
FOR THE 5 MAJOR TENANTS OF THE
SHOPPING CENTER.
PAGE 3.1
SIGN TYPE 3
MONUMENT ID
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
FABRICATED ALUM CABINET WITH ENGINEERED
STRUCTURAL AS REQUIRED
ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS
PUSH TRHU ILLUMINATED ACRYLIC TENANT NAMES
REMOVABLE ALUM TENANT PANELS
06.21.18
PAGE 3.2
SIGN TYPE 3
FULL SIZE MOCK-UP PHOTOS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
SIGN HEIGHT ALLOWS MOTORISTS TO
SEE CAMPUS TENANTS OVER HEAVY TRAFFIC
06.21.18
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
TENANT NAME
TENANT NAME
TENANT NAME
TENANT NAME
TENANT NAME
2121 - 2190 Towne Centre Place / 2390 E. Orangewood Ave
60'-0"+/-
15'-0"
20'-0"
70'-0"+/-
AD
J
A
C
E
N
T
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
AD
J
A
C
E
N
T
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
06.21.18
SIGN TYPE 3
SIXE COMPARISON
LINK OC MIXED-USE VS AXIS OFFICE PARK
PAGE 3.3
PAGE 4.0
SIGN TYPE 4
TENANT ON BUILDING ID
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PURPOSE To identify business names occupying a storefront.
MAXIMUM NUMBER One per tenant’s building elevation. (storefront, back or side if an end unit)
LOCATION Mounted to building face via architectural rail system. (see architectural
drawings for rail details) Locations on building indicated on page 4.1, 4.2 & 4.3.
ORIENTATION Parallel to wall toward street, parking lot or pedestrian area.
SIGN COPY One business name and or logo per location.
SIDES Single-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE 4.1 Primary
Height: 5’-0” Maximum
Max Area: 75% of leased store front x 2
4.2 Secondary
Height: 5’-0” Maximum
Max Area: 75% of leased store front x 2
4.3 Tertiary
Height: 3’-0” Maximum
Max Area: 75% of leased store front x 1
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Individual letters and logos only. Creative cabinet signs or cloud signs
allowed. Tenant is permitted to mount directly to structural mounting system
or base align business name to structural mounting system. Structural
mounting system is intended to preserve architectural features/materials.
ILLUMINATION Internally illuminated, halo-lit letters & reverse pan channel letters with
exposed neon allowed. Timer is required.
LOGO Permitted. Must be approved by the Center Owner.
LETTERSTYLE Logo typefaces. Lettering must be approved by the Center Owner.
COLORS Tenant logo colors or colors that compliment center architecture. Subject to
landlord review & approval.
All mount point locations to be verified on site prior to fabrication.
06.21.18
PAGE 4.1
SIGN TYPE 4
TENANT ON BUILDING ID
BUILDING A
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST EAST
4.1 PRIMARY
4.2 SECONDARY
4.3 TERTIARY
12" MARGIN BETWEEN LEFT & RIGHT CANOPY EDGE TYPICAL ALL TENANT SIGNS
24” MARGIN BETWEEN LEFT & RIGHT BUILDING EDGE TYPICAL ALL TENANT SIGNS
EQ
EQ
TENANT SIGNS CENTERED VERTICALLY ON ARCHITECTURE TYPICAL ALL WALL MOUNTED SIGNS
06.21.18
23'-6"
75% = 17’-8”
70% = 16’-5”
PAGE 4.2
SIGN TYPE 4
TENANT ON BUILDING ID
BUILDING B
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
EAST
WEST
NORTH SOUTH
4.1 PRIMARY
4.2 SECONDARY
4.3 TERTIARY
24” MARGIN BETWEEN LEFT & RIGHT BUILDING EDGE TYPICAL ALL TENANT SIGNS
12" MARGIN BETWEEN LEFT & RIGHT CANOPY EDGE TYPICAL ALL TENANT SIGNS
TENANT SIGNS CENTERED VERTICALLY ON ARCHITECTURE TYPICAL ALL WALL MOUNTED SIGNS EQ
EQ
06.21.18
PAGE 4.3
SIGN TYPE 4
TENANT ON BUILDING ID
BUILDING C
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
4.1 PRIMARY
4.2 SECONDARY
4.3 TERTIARY
WEST
EAST
NORTHSOUTH
12" MARGIN BETWEEN LEFT & RIGHT CANOPY EDGE TYPICAL ALL TENANT SIGNS
24” MARGIN BETWEEN LEFT & RIGHT BUILDING EDGE TYPICAL ALL TENANT SIGNS
TENANT SIGNS CENTERED VERTICALLY ON ARCHITECTURE TYPICAL ALL WALL MOUNTED SIGNS
EQ
EQ
06.21.18
PAGE 5.0
SIGN TYPE 5
ENTRY MONUMENT
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PURPOSE To serve as identification for the shopping center and
its tenants.
MAXIMUM NUMBER 4 (2 at each driveway)
LOCATION Flanking main driveways off La Palma Ave and Tustin Ave.
ORIENTATION 45 degrees to street facing driveway.
SIGN COPY Project Name.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Single-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Width: 3'-4"
Height: 15'-0"
Graphic Area: 15 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Smooth, durable, non-weathering sign. (cabinet signs with
translucent or transparent backgrounds are not permitted). All
hardware shall be of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Project name be face-lit and edge of sign cabinet to be lit with
soft glowing light.
LOGO Project logo permitted.
LETTERSTYLE Neutra Text
COLORS Silver, orange, white & dark grays.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
15'-0"
40"
06.21.18
*REPLACES EXISTING
PAGE 5.1
SIGN TYPE 5
ENTRY MONUMENT
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM06.21.18
AREA - WITHIN THE ALLOWED
WIDTH - WITHIN THE ALLOWED
HEIGHT - EXCEEDS THE MAX BY 7’
WE FEEL THE MAX HEIGHT OF 8’ DOES
NOT ALLOW ADEQUATE IDENTIFICATION
TO INCOMING SHOPPING CENTER
GUESTS.
FABRICATED ALUM CABINET WITH ENGINEERED
STRUCTURAL AS REQUIRED
ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS
PAGE 5.2
SIGN TYPE 5
FULL SIZE MOCK-UP PHOTOS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM06.21.18
PAGE 6.0
SIGN TYPE 6a
TENANT MONUMENT
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PURPOSE To serve as identification for primary tenants at shopping center.
MAXIMUM NUMBER Two
LOCATION Qty 2 along Tustin Ave & Qty 1 along La Palma Ave.
ORIENTATION Perpendicular to street.
SIGN COPY Tenant name or logo.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Double-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Width: 10'-0"
Height: 5’-10"
Graphic Area: 24 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Smooth, durable, non-weathering sign.
(cabinet signs with translucent or transparent
backgrounds are not permitted). All hardware shall
be of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Internally illuminated in a manner that lights only
the sign copy. Illumination of sign background is
prohibited. Lighting shall be designed so as not to
cause glare to motorists. Exposed neon and exposed
raceways are prohibited.
LOGO Color tenant logos permitted.
LETTERSTYLE Tenant Font
COLORS White & dark grays for the monument. Logo colors will vary.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
TENANT NAME
S
TR
E
E
T
S
ID
E
6A TENANT CONDITION
10'-0"
5'-10"
*REPLACES EXISTING
06.21.18
S
TR
E
E
T
S
ID
E
PAGE 6.1
SIGN TYPE 6b
TENANT MONUMENT
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
PURPOSE To serve as identification for apartment homes.
MAXIMUM NUMBER One
LOCATION Qty 1 along La Palma Ave.
ORIENTATION Perpendicular to street.
SIGN COPY Project name/logo.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Double-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Width: 10'-0"
Height: 5'-10"
Graphic Area: 24 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Smooth, durable, non-weathering sign.
(cabinet signs with translucent or transparent
backgrounds are not permitted). All hardware shall
be of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Internally illuminated in a manner that lights only
the sign copy. Illumination of sign background is
prohibited. Lighting shall be designed so as not to
cause glare to motorists. Exposed neon and exposed
raceways are prohibited.
LOGO Project logo.
LETTERSTYLE Project font
COLORS Silver, orange & dark grays.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
APARTMENT HOMES
6B RESIDENTIAL CONDITION
10'-0"
5'-10"
*NEW SIGN
06.21.18
PAGE 6.2
SIGN TYPE 6b
TENANT MONUMENT
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM06.21.18
SCALE: 3/16” = 1’
AREA - WITHIN THE ALLOWED
WIDTH - WITHIN THE ALLOWED
HEIGHT - WITHIN THE ALLOWED
FABRICATED ALUM CABINET WITH
ENGINEERED STRUCTURAL AS REQUIRED
ILLUMINATED PUSH THRU ACRYLIC
GRAPHICS
REMOVABLE ALUM TENANT
PANEL
PAGE 6.3
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM06.21.18
SIGN TYPE 6
PAGE 7.0
SIGN TYPE 7
OFFICE MONUMENT
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
PURPOSE To serve as identification for the office building.
MAXIMUM NUMBER One.
ORIENTATION Parallel to N. Pacificenter Drive in front of office building.
SIGN COPY Project name & tenant names.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Single-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Width: 5'-8"
Height: 10'-4"
Graphic Area: 60 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Concrete base with smooth, durable, non-weathering sign
components. All hardware shall be of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Ground mounted up lights or internal illumination.
LOGO Permitted.
COLORS Silver, orange & dark grays.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
10'-4"
5'-8"
06.21.18
PAGE 8.0
SIGN TYPE 8
BUILDING SIGN
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
PURPOSE To serve as identification for residential buildings.
MAXIMUM NUMBER One per sites A & B.
ORIENTATION Parallel to building face.
SIGN COPY Project or building name.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Single-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Site A
Width: 9'-0"
Height: 44'-0"
Graphic Area: 396 sq. ft.
Site B
Width: 10'-0"
Height: 37'-0"
Graphic Area: 370 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Smooth, durable, non-weathering sign components.
All hardware shall be of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Internal illumination permitted.
LOGO Permitted.
COLORS Project or building colors.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 6
(+10'-1")
(+20'-2")
(+30'-3")LEVEL 4
LEVEL 5(+40'-4")
(+50'-5")
"
1
-
'
0
1
1
0
'
-
1
"
1
0
'
-
1
"
"
1
-
'
0
1
"
1
-
'
0
1
"
8
-
'
2
1
ROOF(+94'-0")
88
'
-
4"
MAX. HT.(+88'-4")
SITE A
SITE B
06.21.18
PAGE 9.0
SIGN TYPE 9
BUILDING FIN
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
PURPOSE To serve as identification for residential buildings.
MAXIMUM NUMBER One per sites A & B.
ORIENTATION Parallel to face of architectural fin.
SIGN COPY Project or building name.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Double-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Site A
Width: 6'-0"
Height: 35'-0"
Graphic Area: 210 sq. ft.
Site B
Width: 6'-0"
Height: 30'-0"
Graphic Area: 180 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Smooth, durable, non-weathering sign components.
All hardware shall be of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Internal illumination permitted.
LOGO Permitted.
COLORS Project or building colors.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
SITE A
SITE B
06.21.18
PAGE 10.0
SIGN TYPE 10
BIKE PATH
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
PURPOSE To serve as identification for bicycle path.
.
MAXIMUM NUMBER n/a
LOCATION Adjacent to bike path. See construction documents for exact
locations.
ORIENTATION Perpendicular to bike path.
SIGN COPY See exhibit.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Double-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Width: 17"
Height: 7'-6"
Graphic Area: 2.25 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Smooth, durable, non-weathering sign components.
All hardware shall be of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Not permitted.
LOGO Not permitted.
COLORS Silver, white & dark grays.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
7'-6"
17"
06.21.18
PAGE 11.0
SIGN TYPE 11
VEHICLE DIRECTIONAL
ELEVATION & SPECIFICATIONS
PURPOSE To provide vehicular direction throught the center.
.
MAXIMUM NUMBER n/a
LOCATION Adjacent to drive aisles. See construction documents for exact
locations.
ORIENTATION Perpendicular to drive aisles.
SIGN COPY Tenant names using project font.
Brand names and info which makes sign appear to be an
advertisement, such as ® and TM are prohibited.
SIDES Double-sided.
MAX. SIGN AREA & SIZE Width: 2’-2 1/2"
Height: 5'-8"
Graphic Area: 12 sq. ft.
SIGN CONSTRUCTION Smooth, durable, non-weathering sign components.
All hardware shall be of nonferrous metals.
ILLUMINATION Ground illumination permitted.
LOGO Not permitted.
COLORS Silver, white & dark grays.
See construction documents for exact finish details.
LINK OC SIGN PROGRAM
TENANT
NAME
TENANT
NAME
TENANT
NAME
TENANT
NAME5'-8"
26 1/2"
06.21.18
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: AUGUST 20, 2018
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857A
LOCATION: 924 – 926 S. Beach Boulevard and 2961 W. Ball Road
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Robert
M. McElroy.
REQUEST: The applicant requests to amend a previously approved conditional use
permit (CUP) for a recently constructed carwash facility. The amendment would
delete a condition of approval pertaining to a requirement to retrofit windows, for
sound attenuation purposes, at an existing motel adjacent to the subject property.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, approving the deletion of Condition No. 43 for CUP2016-
05857 and determining that this request is categorically exempt from further
environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
under Class 1 (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
BACKGROUND: In July 2016, the Planning Commission approved Resolution
No. PC2016-058 approving CUP2016-05857 to allow the construction of a new
carwash facility. The CUP included alterations to two legal nonconforming
freestanding signs and a variance to allow fewer parking spaces than required by the
Zoning Code. The approximately 1.06-acre project site is located north and east of
the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ball Road with approximately 37 feet
of frontage on the east side of Beach Boulevard and 221 feet of frontage on the north
side of Ball Road.
The carwash facility began operating in July 2018. Prior to the construction of the
carwash, a 28-unit motel, a 2,200 square-foot retail building and an 800 square-foot
four-car garage occupied the site. Vehicles access the site directly from Ball Road
via two existing driveways and indirectly from Beach Boulevard through the
adjacent automotive service station property located to the south and west of the
project site. There currently is a reciprocal access and use agreement between the
two properties that Planning Commission required as a condition of approval of the
CUP for the carwash facility.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-005857A
August 20, 2018
Page 2 of 6
The project site is located in the “C-G” (General Commercial) zone and designated for
Neighborhood Center land uses by the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include the Travel
Inn Motel to the north, an automotive service station to the west and south, commercial uses to
the east, south (across Ball Road) and west (across Beach Boulevard). The project site is also
located within the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan area, which Planning Commission will review
in fall 2018. The draft specific plan designates the subject site for commercial land use.
In conjunction with the CUP application, the applicant submitted a noise and vibration impact
analysis that recommended the replacement of windows at the Travel Inn Motel, located at 920 S.
Beach Boulevard and immediately adjacent to the north of the project site. To attenuate the noise
and vibration from the carwash, the analysis recommended replacement of 14 of the motel’s
windows with double-paned or dual-glazed windows with a sound transmission class (STC)
rating of 32 or higher. The analysis recommended replacement of seven windows on first floor
and seven on second floor. The analysis, which was a pre-construction study of the carwash’s
potential noise impacts, determined that the carwash dryers, located to the northwest of the
carwash tunnel exit, directly affect these windows. Attachment 11 – Site Photos shows the
location of the windows in relation to the carwash dryers. The applicant subsequently submitted a
supplemental technical memorandum recommending, in lieu of the 14 replacement windows, the
construction of a noise barrier consisting of an eight-foot high concrete block wall with seven feet
of transparent Plexiglas material along the northwesterly property line. Based on the supplemental
technical memorandum, staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt this
supplemental recommendation.
Prior to the public hearing before the Planning Commission on the CUP to allow the carwash
facility, staff received a letter of opposition to the project from Peter Liu, the owner of the Travel
Inn Motel (Attachment 4). In the letter and at the public hearing, Mr. Liu raised concerns
regarding the potential noises impacts of the carwash tunnel for motel guest, citing that his
business would suffer because of the carwash, which is located approximately five feet from the
motel building. At the public hearing for the CUP, the Planning Commission added Condition No.
43 as a “good neighbor” policy to the proposed resolution, requiring the replacement of the 14
windows along the southerly side of Mr. Liu’s motel in addition to the noise barrier at the
property line. Condition No. 43 states:
“The applicant shall fund the cost incurred by the owner of the motel immediately
adjacent to and north of the subject property to retrofit those 14 motel room
windows (7 on the first floor and 7 on the second floor located immediately above
the 7 first floor windows) located between the westerly exit of the automotive
washing tunnel along the southerly facade of the hotel towards Beach Boulevard.
The retrofitting shall consist of double -paned or dual -glazed windows with STC -
32 or higher. This condition may be satisfied by the applicant obtaining and
delivering to the Planning Director a letter from the owner of the motel confirming
that the applicant has provided funds to the owner of the motel sufficient to pay for
the window retrofitting, regardless of whether the work of retrofitting has been
performed or completed.”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-005857A
August 20, 2018
Page 3 of 6
“The Planning Director is authorized to waive the applicant's compliance with this
condition and deem this condition satisfied and of no further force and effect upon
an evidentiary showing by the applicant that its best efforts to fund the window
retrofitting have been declined, refused or ignored by the owner of the motel after
repeated and exhaustive attempts over a reasonable period of time.”
As noted in the applicant’s statement of facts (Attachment 10), the owner of the carwash facility
(Mr. Robert McElroy) contacted Mr. Liu on several occasions and provided Mr. Liu with two
certified letters in an attempt to satisfy Condition No. 43 (Attachment 5). Subsequently, Mr.
McElroy received a letter from Mr. Liu’s attorney requesting the replacement of 24 windows and
the motel’s lobby door (Attachment 6). Staff provided a response letter to Mr. Liu’s attorney
clarifying that Mr. McElroy is only responsible for funding the replacement of 14 windows as
required by Condition No. 43 (Attachment 7). Staff’s response letter also provided Mr. Liu with a
14-day period in which to advise Mr. McElroy of Mr. Liu’s election to replace the 14 windows
and make reasonable accommodations to allow the Mr. McElroy to complete the work in a timely
manner, or to accept a cash payment for the cost of the 14 windows. The letter concluded that
failure to advise Mr. McElroy within the 14-day period could result in the waiver of the condition.
Mr. Liu contacted staff within the 14-day period in an attempt to resolve the issue. During this
time, Mr. McElroy obtained several bids from window contractors to cover the cost of replacing
the 14 windows. After reviewing the bids and verifying that the windows and work to be
completed met the requirements of Condition No. 43, staff determined that Mr. McElroy or Mr.
Liu could complete the window replacements for $9,794.75 (Attachment 8). Mr. McElroy
subsequently met with Mr. Liu to present him with a check for this amount in an attempt to
resolve the issue. According to Mr. McElroy, Mr. Liu requested the replacement of 21 windows
or $20,000 to cover the costs. Unable to reach an agreement with Mr. Liu, Mr. McElroy requested
a hearing with the Planning Commission to consider the deletion of Condition No. 43, citing that
Mr. Liu has been uncooperative and unreasonable in his requests to resolve this issue. Ideally, Mr.
McElroy preferred to have his contractor, while on site for the carwash project, facilitate or
oversee the window replacement, which would have been both practical and cost effective.
Unfortunately, as reported by Mr. McElroy, Mr. Liu’s lack of cooperation and requests for a
scope of work significantly exceeding what is required in Condition No. 43 prevented this from
occurring.
Mr. McElroy has also provided updated noise level measurements of the carwash facility’s
operations (Attachment 12). Now that construction is complete, these measurements reflect actual
conditions and the implementation of all required noise attenuation measures, with the exception
of the window replacements. The measurements demonstrate that the noise impacts from the
operation of the carwash facility are negligible to the surrounding uses, including Mr. Liu’s
business.
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests that the Planning Commission delete Condition No. 43 of
Resolution No. PC2016-058, which requires that the applicant fund the cost incurred by the
owner of the adjacent motel to the north of the subject property to replace 14 motel room
windows consisting of double -paned or dual -glazed windows with STC -32 or higher along the
southerly facade of the motel.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-005857A
August 20, 2018
Page 4 of 6
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Before the Planning Commission may amend a CUP, it must
make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized
by this code;
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth
and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular
area or health and safety;
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon
the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
The Planning Commission found and determined that it could make the above findings in its
approval of the CUP. The analysis below is specific to the proposed deletion or modification of
Condition No. 43.
Anaheim General Plan Noise Element. By way of general background, the City has adopted a
Noise Element in its General Plan, which incorporated the State Interior and Exterior Noise
Standards. Single-family and multi-family residences are normally acceptable with exterior noise
environments of up to 65 decibels. Interior noise levels within residential structures are acceptable
up to 45 decibels. Hotels and motels are normally acceptable when the interior noise
environments are up to 45 decibels. The General Plan does not have established exterior noise
standards for hotels and motels.
Anaheim Municipal Code (Code) Noise Ordinance. The City has the authority to set land use
noise standards and place restrictions on private activities that generate excessive or intrusive
noise. The Code limits sound levels for stationary sources of noise radiated for extended periods
from any premises in excess of 60 decibels at the property line. However, in order for a noise to
be considered objectionable, the increase in sound from the objectionable noise source must be
five decibels or more above the levels prevailing at the same point when the source of the alleged
objectionable sound are not operating.
As previously stated, the applicant provided updated post-construction noise level measurements
for the carwash facility that reflect the implementation of all noise attenuation measures, with the
exception of the window replacements. LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) conducted the updated
measurements on August 1, 2018 to supplement the noise and vibration impact analysis and
supplemental technical memorandum, which LSA prepared. LSA conducted the exterior noise
level measurements near the northern property line of the carwash facility site, between the motel
units and the 15-foot high sound attenuation wall. The noise level measurements included the
ambient noise with and without the carwash in operation. Ambient noise sources include traffic
noise on Beach Boulevard and Ball Road as well as window air conditioning units from the first
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-005857A
August 20, 2018
Page 5 of 6
and second floor of the motel units. LSA did not conduct noise level measurements of the interior
of the motel rooms because LSA could not obtain access. The results of the exterior noise level
measurements are as follows:
Criteria Exterior Noise
Level
Average ambient noise level without carwash 64.3 decibels
Average ambient noise level with carwash 66.8 decibels
Increase in ambient noise levels with carwash 2.5 decibels
The increase in ambient noise levels with the carwash in operation is 2.5 decibels. The Code
states that to have a valid reading that is considered objectionable, the noise levels must be five
decibels or more above the levels prevailing at the same point when the source of the alleged
objectionable sound are not operating. Further, this noise increase is less than the three decibels
threshold of human perceptibility (as described in the findings of the updated noise measurement
results by LSA), meaning that the increase in ambient noise level would not be perceptible to the
human ear in an outdoor environment. Based on the analysis provided by LSA, the exterior noise
impacts from operation of the carwash facility are negligible given that the existing ambient
noises levels.
Although, LSA did not conduct noise level measurements of the interior of the motel rooms, staff
assumes that the noise impacts from the carwash facility alone would be minimal given the
existing ambient noise environment. Finally, the carwash facility operates daily from 7:00 a.m. to
9:00 p.m., thereby reducing nighttime noise impacts to motel guests during non-operating hours
and times when ambient noise from traffic and other area sources is reduced.
Based on the information presented above, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve the applicant’s request to delete Condition No. 43 of Resolution No. PC2016-058. Staff
believes that the Commission can make the required findings of fact, including the finding that
the carwash facility will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses.
In the alternative, the Commission could modify Condition No. 43 to require the applicant’s
tender of a specified amount that Mr. Liu may use to replace all or some of the windows. If the
Commission pursues this option, staff recommends the Commission cap this amount (e.g., not to
exceed $5,000, which amount approximates the average of the bids obtained by the applicant and
staff to replace 14 windows). In addition, if the Commission pursues this alternative, staff
recommends the language specify that the applicant would satisfy this condition by offering
payment to Mr. Liu. If Mr. Liu refuses to accept payment within a limited number of days of it
being offered, the condition should be considered waived on its own terms. Below is a draft
modified Condition No. 43, which the Commission may wish to consider. This condition would
replace the existing Condition No. 43 in its entirety.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-005857A
August 20, 2018
Page 6 of 6
“The applicant shall tender to the owner of the motel immediately adjacent to and
north of the subject property _______________ (e.g. $5,000), which amount
reflects the cost to retrofit all or a portion of the 14 motel room windows located
between the westerly exit of the automotive washing tunnel along the southerly
facade of the hotel towards Beach Boulevard. The Planning and Building Director
is authorized to waive the applicant's compliance with this condition and deem this
condition satisfied and of no further force and effect upon an evidentiary showing
by the applicant that its best efforts to fund the window retrofitting have been
declined, refused or ignored by the owner of the motel.”
Environmental Review: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the
proposed deletion of a condition of approval are typical of those generated within the Class 1 –
Existing Facilities Categorical Exemption. Class 1 consists of the of the repair, maintenance,
and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or
no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. Pursuant to Section
15300.02 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual
circumstances in respect to the proposed condition of approval for which staff would anticipate a
significant effect on the environment. Therefore, this request is categorically exempt from the
provisions of CEQA.
CONCLUSION: The proposed deletion or modification of Condition No. 43 of Resolution No.
PC2016-058 pertaining to a requirement to retrofit windows at an existing motel adjacent to the
subject property for sound attenuation purposes will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses.
Staff recommends either the deletion or modification of the condition with the language above.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Gustavo N. Gonzalez Susan Kim
Senior Planner Principal Planner
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution
2. Resolution No. PC2016-058
3. Staff Report (July 11, 2016), including project plans, noise study, memo and Class 32 Checklist
4. Correspondence from Mr. Liu
5. Correspondence from Mr. McElroy to Mr. Liu
6. Correspondence from Mr. Liu’s Attorney
7. Correspondence from City to Mr. Liu’s Attorney
8. Window Replacement Estimate
9. Letter of Request
10. Applicant’s Statement of Facts
11. Site Photos
12. Updated Noise Measurement Results
C-GDEV 2016-00010A(CUP 4120)CAR WASH
C-GSERVICE STATION
C-GRETAIL
C-GRETAIL
C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL
TRELIGIOUS USE
RM-4FRENCH COUNTRYAPARTMENTS33 DU
R S -2
S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E
C-G (MHP)TRAILS END MOBILEHOME PARK
C-GRETAIL
C-GPICK YOUR PARTAUTO RECYCLER
C-GRETAIL
C-GRETAIL
C-GRETAIL
C-GTRAVEL INN MOTEL
C-GSHADOW PARK INN & SUITES
RM-4LYNROSE MANORAPARTMENTS72 DU
RM-4COBBLESTONEAPARTMENTS30 DU
RM-4COBBLESTONEAPARTMENTS34 DU
C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL
R S -2
S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E
C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL
R S -2
S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E
C-GAPARTMENTS
C-GROBIN HOOD MOTEL
C-GARAB AMERICANCOMMUNITY CENTER
C-GSAHARA MOTEL
C-GANAHEIM LODGE
W BALL RD
S
B
E A C
H
B L V
D
S B E A C H B L V D
S
G
A Y M
O N
T
S T
W LY NR OS E DR
W D E V O Y D R
W. BALL RD
W. ORANGE AVE
S . D A L E A V E
. CERRITO S AVE
S . K N O T T A V E
S . M A G N O L I A A V E
S . W E S T E R N A V E
2 9 6 1 W e s t B a ll Ro a d
D E V N o . 2 0 1 6 -0 0 0 1 0 A
Subject Property APN: 126-261-04
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Ph oto :Ma y 2 01 6
W BALL RD
S
B
E A C
H
B L V
D
S B E A C H B L V D
S
G
A Y M
O N
T
S T
W LY NR OS E DR
W D E V O Y D R
W. BALL RD
W. ORANGE AVE
S . D A L E A V E
. CERRITO S AVE
S . K N O T T A V E
S . M A G N O L I A A V E
S . W E S T E R N A V E
2 9 6 1 W e s t B a ll Ro a d
D E V N o . 2 0 1 6 -0 0 0 1 0 A
Subject Property APN: 126-261-04
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Ph oto :No ve m be r 20 17
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2018-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857A AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2016-00010A)
(924-926 SOUTH BEACH BOULEVARD AND 2961 WEST BALL ROAD)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
did receive a verified petition to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857 (“CUP2016-
05857A”) to delete a condition of approval pertaining to a requirement to retrofit windows at an
existing motel adjacent to the subject property for sound attenuation purposes (herein referred to
collectively as the "Proposed Project") for the premises located at 2961 West Ball Road in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.06-acres in size and is developed with 4,992
square-foot carwash facility with 26 self-serve vacuum stations/parking stalls. The Land Use
Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Neighborhood Center land
uses. The Property is located within the "C-G" General Commercial Zone. As such, the
Property is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (General
Commercial Zone) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, on July 11, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., and subject to certain conditions of approval,
the Planning Commission, by Resolution No. PC2016-058, approved Conditional Use Permit
No. 2016-05857 (herein referred to as the “Original CUP”) to 1) allow the construction of a new
car wash facility and to permit alterations to two legal nonconforming freestanding signs; and, 2)
a variance to allow fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on August 20, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and
to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the
preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the
Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 –
Existing Facilities) which consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing,
licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical
- 2 - PC2018-***
equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that
existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the
CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment
and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857A, does find
and determine the following facts:
1. The proposed request to delete a condition of approval pertaining to a requirement
to retrofit windows at an existing motel adjacent to the subject property for sound attenuation
purposes is allowed within the "C-G" General Commercial Zone under Section 18.08.030 (Uses)
of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the
zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone.
2. The use under Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857A, under the conditions
imposed, is compatible with the existing uses in the surrounding area because the noise impacts
from operation of the carwash facility are negligible given that the existing ambient noises levels
without the carwash in operation already exceed the noise standards established by the General
Plan and Municipal Code, and also are higher than the noises levels of the carwash alone. Further,
the increase in ambient noise levels with the carwash in operation would be 2.5 decibels. The
Noise Code states that to have a valid reading that is considered objectionable, the noise levels
must be five decibels or more above the levels prevailing at the same point when the source of the
alleged objectionable sound are not operating. This noise increase is less than the 3 decibels
threshold of human perceptibility, meaning that the increase in ambient noise level would not be
perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. In addition, it can also be assumed that
the noise impacts from the carwash facility alone would be minimal given the existing ambient
noise environment.. Finally, the carwash facility operates daily from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.,
thereby reducing nighttime noise impacts to motel guests during non-operating hours and times
when ambient noise from traffic and other area sources is reduced.
3. The size and shape of the site for the use under Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-
05857A is, under the conditions imposed, adequate to allow the full development of the use in a
manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because the carwash
facitlity on the Property will adhere to all required land use standards.
4. The traffic generated by the use under Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857A,
under the conditions imposed, will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways
designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use
will not increase due to the modification of the condition.
5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857A, under the conditions
imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as
the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval
for the use and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
- 3 - PC2018-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857A, and (ii) the conditions of approval set forth
in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to
be a necessary prerequisite to the use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-
05857A in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of
Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in
accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of
approval may be amended by the Planning and Building Director upon a showing of good cause
provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the
condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated
significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, effective upon the effective date of this
Resolution, the Revised Conditions of Approval hereby amend the Previous Conditions of
Approval and hereby replace the Previous Conditions of Approval in their entirety. All
references to the conditions of approval for the CUP shall be to the Revised Conditions of
Approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B, which shall control and govern the CUP, as
amended by Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of
this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
- 4 - PC2018-***
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of August 20, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and
may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on August 20, 2018, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of August, 2018.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2018-***
- 6 - PC2018-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857A
(DEV2016-00010A)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
1 An Encroachment Permit from Caltrans shall be obtained for the pole
sign fronting the Caltrans right-of-way on Beach Boulevard.
Public Works
Development Services
2
The applicant shall submit to the Public Works Department,
Development Services Division for review and approval a Water
Quality Management Plan that conforms with current Orange County
Guidelines and Requirements as well as the City’s WQMP Review
Checklist. Said WQMP shall:
Address Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) such
as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability,
minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating
reduced or “zero discharge” areas, and conserving natural areas.
Incorporate applicable Routine Source Control BMPs.
Incorporate Treatment Control BMPs.
Describe the long-term operation and maintenance, identifies the
responsible parties, and funding mechanisms for the Treatment
Control BMPs.
Public Works
Development Services
3
The project’s Final Grading, Soils, and Drainage Reports shall be
submitted for review and approval to the Development Services
Division.
Public Works
Development Services
4
The property owner shall submit project improvement plans that
incorporate the required drainage improvements and the mechanisms
proposed in the approved Final Drainage Report. No off site run-off
shall be blocked during and after grading operations or perimeter wall
construction. Finish floor elevations shall be 1-ft. minimum above water
surface elevations of 100-year event.
Public Works
Development Services
5
The final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted
for review and approval to Public Works Development Services and
comply with the most current requirements of the Orange County
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP).
Public Works
Development Services
6
The applicant shall demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under
California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with
Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI)
Public Works
Development Services
- 7 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the
subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge
Identification (WDID) Number. The applicant shall prepare and
implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of
the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for
City review upon request.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
7 Prior to the issuance of a building permit and under the circumstances
where the owner/applicant elects to have vehicular access to its property
over and across that certain adjacent property upon which an automotive
service station is now located to and from Beach Boulevard, the
owner/applicant shall enter into an unsubordinated easement agreement
with the owner of said adjacent property, providing for said vehicular
access over and across said adjacent property to and from Beach
Boulevard. The unsubordinated easement agreement shall be in a form
satisfactory to the City Attorney and approved by the Director of the
Planning and Building Department and the Director of Public Works
prior and as a condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit
and following approval thereof shall be recorded in the Official Records
of the County of Orange. A copy of the recorded easement agreement
shall then be submitted to the Planning Division of the Planning and
Building Department.
Planning Services
Division
8 Final detailed landscape and irrigation plans submitted for Planning
staff review and approval shall reflect the site plan as approved by the
Planning Commission. If no Beach Boulevard access is provided, then
the western portion of the site adjacent to Beach Boulevard shall be
planted with decorative landscaping to deter loitering in this area to the
satisfaction of Planning and Police Department staff.
Planning Services
Division
9 Trash enclosures should not block visibility of doors or windows or be
located close enough to the structure to provide access to the roof. Police Department
10 That a private water system with separate water service for fire
protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans
submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
11 That a private water system with separate water service for fire
protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans
submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
- 8 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
12 That all backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of
the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets
and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will
have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water
system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water
Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully
screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be
specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and
Cross Connection Control Inspector.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
13 That all requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire
lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of
existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be
coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the
Anaheim Public Utilities Department.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
14 That all existing water services and fire services shall conform to
current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service
and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if
continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no
longer needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to
upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
15 That the Car Wash shall comply with all state laws and local ordinances
for Water Conservation Measures, including Chapter 10.18 of Anaheim
Municipal Code and Ordinance relating to Water Reduction provisions.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
16 That the developer/owner shall submit to the Public Utilities
Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum
fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the
project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the
existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-
site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be
done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates,
Rules, and Regulations.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
17 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property
owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to
establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system
plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related
technical drawings and specifications.
Public Utilities,
Electrical
Engineering
18 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate in a signed deed
to the City of Anaheim an easement 60-feet in width from the centerline
of Ball Road for road, public utilities, and other public purposes.
Public Works
Development
Services
- 9 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
19 The developer shall submit street improvement plans, obtain a right of
way construction permit, and post a security (Performance and Labor &
Materials Bonds) for the construction of all required public
improvements within the City street right of way of Ball Road.
Public Works
Development Services
20 An Encroachment Permit from Caltrans shall be obtained for all work
performed in Caltrans right-of-way within Beach Boulevard.
Public Works
Development Services
21 The legal property owner shall submit an application for a Subdivision
Map Act Certificate of Compliance to the Public Works Department,
Development Services Division. A Certificate of Compliance or
Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall be approved by the City
Surveyor and recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder
prior to issuance of a building permit for the new car wash construction.
Public Works
Development Services
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTION
22
All required on-site Water Quality Management Plan and public right of
way improvements shall be completed, operational, and are subject to
review and approval by the Construction Services Inspector.
Public Works
Development Services
23 An 8-foot high concrete block wall with 7 feet of transparent material
on top of the wall shall be installed on the north property line as
described in the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis memorandum
(dated June 9, 2016) prepared by LSA Associates.
Planning Services
Division
24 Owner shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the
water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line
and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department
Water Engineering Division requirements.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
25
Curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red to prohibit parallel
parking in the drive aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled on
building plans.
Public Works
Traffic Engineering
26
Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to
the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as
shown on the approved utility service plan.
Public Utilities,
Electrical
Engineering
27
Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit
payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees.
Public Utilities,
Electrical Engineering
28 Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize
observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security
planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines.
Police Department
29 Trees should not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy Police Department
- 10 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult.
30 Building shall be equipped with a comprehensive security surveillance
camera and alarm system (silent or audible) for the following coverage
areas:
• High value storage area
• Cash/Coin machine/room
Police Department
31 Whenever possible, open fencing design, such as wrought iron or
tubular steel, should be utilized to maximize natural surveillance while
enhancing territorial reinforcement.
Police Department
32 Minimum recommended lighting level in all parking lots is .5 foot-
candle maintained, measured at the parking surface, with a maximum to
minimum ratio no greater than 15:1.
Police Department
33 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the entrances of parking
lots/structures and located in other appropriate places. Signs must be at
least 2’ x 1’ in overall size, with white background and black 2”
lettering.
Police Department
34 All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per
22658(a) C.V.C., to assist in removal of vehicles at the property
owners/managers request.
Police Department
35 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL listed
meter, Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator Register, no
equals.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
36 That the developer/owner shall provide the Planning Department with
detailed plans for a decorative vehicular gate in accordance with City
Standard Detail No. 475 to secure the parking/vacuum area at close of
business to prevent unauthorized parking and overnight camping.
Planning Services
Division
37 That the developer/owner shall work with Planning staff on determining
a final color scheme for the exterior façade of the automotive washing
tunnel.
Planning Services
Division
38 Parking lot striping shall be provided, per City Standard Detail No. 470.
Disabled parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with the
Americans Department with Disabilities Act and City Standard Detail
No. 436-G.
Planning Services
Division
- 11 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
39 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds
contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient
wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of
darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person,
property, and vehicles on-site. All exterior doors shall have their own
light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to
make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises
and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building.
Addresses shall be well lighted during hours of darkness. Minimum
recommended lighting level in all parking lots is .5 foot-candle
maintained, measured at the parking surface, with a maximum to
minimum ratio no greater than 15:1.
Planning Services
Division
40 Landscaping shall be provided around the above ground large meter or
fire service to shield from view of street.
Planning Services
Division
41 All plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior
of the building shall be fully screened by architectural devices and/or
appropriate building materials. Said information shall be specifically
shown on the plans submitted for building permits.
Planning Services
Division
42 Landscaping shall be provided around the trash enclosure and HVAC
equipment enclosure.
Planning Services
Division
CONDITION DELETED
ON-GOING DURING PROJECT OPERATIONS
44 The fabric canopies of the proposed canopy structures shall be
perpetually maintained and replaced as needed to ensure that the
carwash facility maintains a high quality appearance.
Planning Services
Division
45 Should the vehicle queue reach Ball Road, staff members shall be
positioned at the end of the on-site queue area near the Ball Road
entrance to direct traffic and prevent the queue from spilling onto Ball
Road. This measure shall be implemented for a short timeframe, as
needed, until the queue dissipates.
Public Works
Traffic Engineering
46 All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall
adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate
illumination for persons exiting the building.
Police Department
- 12 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
47 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds
contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient
wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of
darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person,
property, and vehicles on-site.
Police Department
48 Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during hours of
darkness. Police Department
49 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from
the street. Number should be illuminated during hours of darkness.
Police Department
50 The parking/vacuuming area shall be secured at close of business to
prevent unauthorized parking and overnight camping. Police Department
51 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent
area under the control of the property owner shall be removed or painted
over within 24 hours of being applied.
Code Enforcement
52 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the premises in an
orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and
removal of trash or debris.
Planning Services
Division/Code
Enforcement
53 All automotive washing employees shall be required to park on the
subject property.
Planning Services
Division
54 The use of the vacuum equipped stalls shall not be limited to customers
vacuuming their cars.
Planning Services
Division
55 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for
outdoor storage.
Planning Services
Division
56 The car wash facility shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of
Operation submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the
business operation as described in the Letter of Operation shall be
subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine
substantial conformance with the Letter of Operation and to ensure
compatibility with the surrounding uses. The facility shall operate from
7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. seven days a week. All wash equipment and
vacuums will be shut off at the end of the day 9:00 p.m. The hours of
operation may be modified subject to prior review and approval by
Planning staff.
Planning Services
Division
- 13 - PC2018-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
GENERAL
57 Any future modification to the approved site plans for access from
Beach Boulevard shall be reviewed and approved by Caltrans, the
Director of Planning and Building, and the Director of Public Works to
determine substantial conformance with the approved site plans and to
ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses and traffic patterns.
Planning Services
Division
Public Works
Traffic Engineering
58 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and
its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to
individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims,
actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review,
set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this
permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or
made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality
or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s
indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages,
fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs
of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees
and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in
connection with such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
59 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the
issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits
for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall
result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the
revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
60 The business premises shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
petitioner, which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as
conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: JULY 11, 2016
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071
LOCATION: 924 – 926 South Beach Boulevard and 2961 West Ball Road
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The agent is Phillip Schwartze,
representing the applicant, Anaheim Express Wash LLC. The property owner is
Chia Chin Liu.
REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following: 1) a conditional use
permit to allow the construction of a new car wash facility and to permit alterations
to two legal nonconforming freestanding signs; and, 2) a variance to allow fewer
parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically
exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 32 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the State
CEQA Guidelines, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857 and
Variance No. 2016-05071.
BACKGROUND: The approximately 1.06-acre project site is located north and
east of the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ball Road with approximately
37 feet of frontage on the east side of Beach Boulevard and 221 feet of frontage on
the north side of Ball Road. The site is developed with a 28-unit motel, a 2,200
square-foot retail building, an 800 square-foot four-car garage and two existing
legal nonconforming freestanding pole signs, one on Beach Boulevard and one on
Ball Road. The site is currently accessed directly from Ball Road via three existing
driveways and indirectly from Beach Boulevard through the adjacent automotive
service station property located to the south and west of the project site. There
currently is no reciprocal access agreement between the two properties.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071
July 11, 2016
Page 2 of 7
The project site is located in the “C-G” (General Commercial) zone and is designated for
Neighborhood Center land uses by the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include motel uses to
the north, an automotive service station to the west and south, commercial uses to the east, south
(across Ball Road) and west (across Beach Boulevard). The project site is also located within the
Beach Boulevard Specific Plan area, which is anticipated to be adopted in fall 2017. The draft
land use plan of the specific plan designates the subject site for commercial land uses.
PROPOSAL: The project entails the demolition of the existing buildings and the construction of
a new 4,992 square-foot self-service express car wash facility. A combination of mid-century
modern and contemporary architectural design is proposed for the new building, which includes
slanted rooflines, glass elements and a combination of plaster and aluminum façades.
Three interior queuing aisles would provide space for up to 21 vehicles with a separate pay station
for each aisle. A total of 26 self-serve vacuum stations are also proposed. The proposed canopy
structures would accommodate the vacuum equipment, provide shade and be constructed of a
metal structure with a fabric canopy.
A total of 26 parking spaces are proposed to accommodate the parking needs of the car wash
which, as further described below, is less than required by the Zoning Code. New eight-foot high
block walls would completely enclose the north and east portions of the project site where the
property interfaces with two adjacent motels to the north and a retail center to the east. In
addition, a seven-foot high Plexiglas screen will be added above the new eight-foot high block
wall along the northerly property line to the west of the car wash tunnel to screen the façade of the
abutting motel property and provide additional sound attenuation. Finally, the applicant is
proposing to restore and relocate the two existing freestanding signs along Ball Road and Beach
Boulevard.
The proposed hours of operation are from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., seven days a week. Three to
five employees per shift are proposed, depending on demand. The first shift would be from 7:00
a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and the second shift would be from 2:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. A detailed
description of the proposed hours and the estimated demand for parking spaces is provided in the
applicant’s Letter of Operation (Attachment 2). Access to the site from Ball Road is proposed
via two ingress and egress driveways along this street frontage. Because Beach Boulevard is a
state highway, access to Beach Boulevard is under the purview of Caltrans (District 12).
Caltrans is presently reviewing the feasibility of allowing a new driveway opening on Beach
Boulevard. As previously described, the property does not currently maintain a driveway from
Beach Boulevard but does enjoy access from that street via the service station to the south. The
applicant is desirous of obtaining a new driveway opening from Beach Boulevard; however, due
to the uncertainty of Caltrans’s determination, the applicant is requesting Planning Commission
consideration of three different site plan alternatives. With respect to circulation, staff analyzed
the three proposed site plans and concluded that all plans provide adequate circulation and would
not negatively impact surrounding properties or the existing street circulation pattern. The three
alternatives are described below.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071
July 11, 2016
Page 3 of 7
Site Plan A: This applicant-preferred option proposes to allow direct ingress and egress access
to the project site from Beach Boulevard via a new driveway apron, which would require
approval from Caltrans (Attachment 3).
SITE PLAN A
Site Plan B: This option proposes to allow egress and ingress access from Beach Boulevard
through the adjacent automotive service station property and would require a reciprocal access
agreement between these two adjoining properties (Attachment 4). The applicant has initiated
discussions with the adjacent property owner but no agreement allowing reciprocal access has
been agreed to or executed.
SITE PLAN B
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071
July 11, 2016
Page 4 of 7
Site Plan C: This option proposes to completely restrict access from Beach Boulevard and
would only allow access from Ball Road. This is the applicant’s least preferred alternative. The
westerly flag portion of the property would be landscaped (Attachment 5).
SITE PLAN C
ANALYSIS: The following is staff’s analysis of the project:
Conditional Use Permit: Automotive washing facilities are permitted subject to the approval of a
conditional use permit. The purpose of the conditional use permit is to ensure proper design and
function of the car wash facility, and also ensure that the vehicular circulation and car wash
operations do not impact surrounding properties. Staff carefully considered the potential impacts
of the proposed car wash improvements on surrounding properties, including circulation, noise,
vehicle stacking and parking.
To address potential concerns related to noise impacts to the adjacent motel to the north, the
applicant submitted a noise and vibration impact analysis (Attachment 13) which concluded that
the operational noise from the automotive washing facility, including the dryers inside the west
end of the wash tunnel, will comply with the maximum 60 decibel sound level permitted by
Zoning Code. In addition, the vacuums will not be used while the facility is closed between 9:00
p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Finally, an eight-foot-high concrete block wall is proposed to be constructed
between the project site and the adjacent motel, with seven feet of transparent Plexiglas
screening installed on top of the wall to further attenuate noise impacts in the area.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071
July 11, 2016
Page 5 of 7
The facility would provide three stacking lanes with a capacity of seven vehicles per lane, for a
total stacking capacity of 21 vehicles. The applicant indicates that the proposed stacking lanes
are adequate for the proposed use based on the wash cycle time of the equipment as described in
the applicant’s Letter of Operation (Attachment 2). Staff has reviewed the proposed stacking lane
configuration and does not anticipate any circulation issues with the proposed operation.
The proposed project would significantly improve the overall appearance of the property and
would address a number of longstanding community concerns regarding the property’s
maintenance, loitering and security issues related to the former motel. Staff anticipates that the
proposed project will have a positive community impact as it will dramatically improve the
appearance of the intersection and result in a significant positive investment in the area.
Given the ongoing review by Caltrans of the applicant’s request for an additional driveway along
Beach Boulevard, and the uncertainty of the adjacent property owner’s willingness to establish a
reciprocal access agreement between the automotive service station property and the subject site,
staff recommends that a condition of approval allowing future modifications for access from
Beach Boulevard to be reviewed and approved by staff. This would allow sufficient flexibility to
redesign the access from Beach Boulevard in any scenario involving Caltrans and/or the adjacent
automotive service station property without requiring the Planning Commission’s review and
approval. As such, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the three proposed
site plans to allow the applicant sufficient flexibility to implement the project in a timely manner.
Legal Nonconforming Freestanding Signs: The applicant is proposing to restore and maintain
two existing freestanding nonconforming pole signs along Beach Boulevard and Ball Road
(Attachment 9). The signs would be relocated along both street frontages from their current
locations to accommodate a required six to ten-foot right-of-way dedication and street
improvements along both street frontages. No other freestanding signs are proposed.
The signs are approximately 40 feet and 20 feet in overall height and approximately six feet and
12 feet in overall width, with the larger sign to be located along Beach Boulevard. The Zoning
Code requires that all new freestanding business signs be limited to low-scale, monument-type
signs not exceeding eight feet in height. However, the code also permits nonconforming signs to
continue, provided that any structural change or alteration that requires a building permit shall be
subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The existing signs would not be increased in
height or size and would be restored to resemble their original character and appearance.
Although staff generally does not support the retention of legal nonconforming pole signs, the
signs proposed to be retained possess a unique “Googie” style design that would be consistent
with proposed architectural elements of the car wash facility and are reflective of the historical
design character of the Beach Boulevard corridor. The restoration and relocation of the signs
would also bring the signs closer to conformity with the Sign Code by eliminating several of the
sign cabinet boxes, removing the signs from the ultimate public right-of-way area and retrofitting
the signs with higher quality illuminated channel letters. Therefore, staff is supportive of the
request.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071
July 11, 2016
Page 6 of 7
Parking Variance: Parking for the project site is required as follows:
Use Size Ratio Required
Automotive-Washing 4,992 sq.ft. 5.5 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. of GFA
+ 5 spaces for drying area. 27 + 5
Total Spaces Required: 32
Total Spaces Provided: 26
The applicant submitted a letter of operation (Attachment 2) to determine the number of spaces
needed for this project. The letter concludes that 26 parking spaces are adequate to meet the
demands of the project based on the proposed operation of the use, including the low number of
employees and the self-service nature of the facility. In order to count the vacuum equipped stalls
as parking spaces, staff has included a condition that these stalls not be limited to customers
vacuuming their cars. Staff has also included a condition requiring that employees park on-site.
Based on the conclusions in the letter of operation, staff recommends approval of the requested
parking variance. In addition, staff is currently analyzing the potential modification and
reduction of required off-street parking spaces for a number of uses, including automotive-
washing facilities, which could result in the project complying with future off-street parking
requirements.
Environmental Impact Analysis: The project’s potential environmental impacts have been
evaluated and staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the development
qualifies for a Class 32 “Infill Development Projects” exemption allowed under California
Environmental Quality Act. In order to support this determination, staff prepared an
environmental checklist and determined that the project would not result in any significant
effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. In reaching this conclusion, staff
determined that the subject property is less than five acres in size and surrounded by urban uses;
has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; and, can be adequately served
by all required utilities and public services. Based on these findings, the project does not meet
the minimum thresholds that would suggest the potential for the project to cause a significant
effect on the environment.
CONCLUSION: The proposed project would represent a significant improvement in the
overall appearance, operation, and security of the site. The new automotive washing facility,
including the proposed refurbished non-conforming signs, would be compatible with the
surrounding commercial uses. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the conditional use
permit and variance requests.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Lisandro Orozco Jonathan E. Borrego
Planner Planning Services Manager
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071
July 11, 2016
Page 7 of 7
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution
2. Letter of Operations and Justifications
3. Site Plan A
4. Site Plan B
5. Site Plan C
6. Landscape Plans
7. Elevations
8. Floor Plans
9. Signs
10. Development Summary
11. Site Photographs
12. Class 32 Environmental Checklist
13. Noise and Vibration Study
C-G
LYNDY'S
MOTEL
C-G
RETAIL
C-G
RESTAURANT
T
RELIGIOUS
USE
C-G
SAHARA MOTEL
C-G
RESTAURANT
C-G
SERVICE
STATION
C-G
SHADOW PARK INN
& SUITES
C-G (MHP)
TRAILS INN MOBILEHOME PARK
RM-4
COBBLESTONE
APARTMENTS
34 DU
C-G
RETAIL
C-G
ROBIN HOOD MOTEL
RM-4
COBBLESTONE
APARTMENTS
30 DU
RM-4
S.F.R.
C-G
APARTMENTS
C-G
AUTO SALVAGE YARD
C-G
ANAHEIM LODGE
RS-2
S.F.R.
C-G
RETAIL
C-G
RETAIL
C-G
RETAIL
RM-4
LYNROSE MANOR
APARTMENTS
72 DU
RS-2
S.F.R.
C-G
TRAVEL INN
MOTEL
C-G
RETAIL
C-G
RETAIL
RS-2
S.F.R.
RM-4
LYNROSE MANOR
APARTMENTS
72 DU
C-G
RETAIL
C-G
RETAIL
C-G
RETAIL
W BALL RD
S
B
E
A
C
H
B
L
V
D
S
B
E
A
C
H
B
L
V
D
S
G
A
Y
M
O
N
T
S
T
W LYNROSE DR
W. BALL RD
W. ORANGE AVE
S.
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
. CERRITOS AVE
S.
K
N
O
T
T
A
V
E
S.
M
A
G
N
O
L
I
A
A
V
E
S.
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
E
924 - 926 South Beach Boulevard and 2961 West Ball Road
DEV No. 2016-00010
Subject Property APN: 126-261-04
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:
June 2015
W BALL RD
S
B
E
A
C
H
B
L
V
D
S
B
E
A
C
H
B
L
V
D
S
G
A
Y
M
O
N
T
S
T
W LYNROSE DR
W. BALL RD
W. ORANGE AVE
S.
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
. CERRITOS AVE
S.
K
N
O
T
T
A
V
E
S.
M
A
G
N
O
L
I
A
A
V
E
S.
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
A
V
E
924 - 926 South Beach Boulevard and 2961 West Ball Road
DEV No. 2016-00010
Subject Property APN: 126-261-04
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:
June 2015
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2016-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2016-00010)
(924-926 SOUTH BEACH BOULEVARD AND 2961 WEST BALL ROAD)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning
Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857 and
Variance No. 2016-05071 for the demolition of an existing motel, garage and retail building and
the construction of an automotive washing facility, and to permit the alteration of two legal
nonconforming signs, with fewer parking spaces than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code
(the "Code") (collectively, the "Proposed Project") for premises located at 924-926 South Beach
Boulevard and 2961 West Ball Road in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated
herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.06-acres in size and is developed with 2,200
square feet of retail space, an 800 square foot four-car garage, a 12,256 square foot motel, large
surface parking areas and two existing legal nonconforming pylon signs along Beach Boulevard
and Ball Road. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for
Commercial-Neighborhood Center land uses. The Property is located within the "C-G" General
Commercial Zone. As such, the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards
described in Chapter 18.08 (General Commercial Zone) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on July 11, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project, including, specifically,
Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857 and Variance No. 2016-05071, and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA
Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
- 2 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is
within that class of projects which consist of in-fill development meeting the conditions
described in Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. Specifically, the Proposed Project (a) is
consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies
and is consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (b) is no more than five
acres in size substantially surrounded by urban uses, (c) has no value as a habitat for endangered,
rare or threatened species, (d) would not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air
quality, or water quality, and (e) the Property can be adequately served by all required utilities
and public services. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, the
Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the request to permit the Project on the Property does find and
determine the following facts:
1. The proposed request to construct an automotive washing facility is an allowable
use within the "C-G" General Commercial Zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030.010
(Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit
and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone; and
2. The proposed request to permit the demolition of existing buildings, and the
construction of an automotive washing facility would not adversely affect the adjoining land
uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the
Proposed Project entails a complete renovation of the Property which will improve the aesthetics
of the improvements on the Property and the overall appearance of the project site, and would
not have an adverse effect on adjacent residential and commercial uses; and
3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the
Proposed Project in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety
because the site can accommodate the parking, traffic flows, and circulation without creating
detrimental effects on adjacent properties; and
4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project would not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the
traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the
surrounding streets and adequate parking will be provided to accommodate the future uses; and
5. The granting of the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the health
and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the Proposed Project would
significantly improve the aesthetics of the buildings and the overall appearance of the project site
is compatible with the surrounding area, subject to compliance with the conditions contained
herein; and
- 3 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine under and
pursuant to subsection .020 of Section 18.56.060 (Nonconforming Signs) of the Code with
respect to the request to permit the relocation and alteration of two of the existing legal non-
conforming signs, as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file with the Planning
and Building Department, as follows:
1. The proposed modifications do not increase the height or area of the sign copy for
either of the two signs and will bring the two signs closer into conformity with the Code; and
2. The proposed modifications will improve the aesthetics of the two signs; and
3. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if
any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, based upon a parking justification letter submitted by the applicant, the
Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for Variance No. 2016-
05071 to allow fewer parking spaces than required by the Code should be approved for the
following reasons:
SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces.
(32 spaces required; 26 spaces proposed)
1. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-
street parking spaces to be provided for the all uses on site than the number of such spaces
necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such uses under the normal and reasonably
foreseeable conditions of operation of such uses. A parking justification letter was prepared by
the applicant, determining that the proposed number of parking spaces within the Property is
sufficient to accommodate all future uses on site; and
2. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of
the Property because the proposed number of parking spaces within the Property is sufficient to
accommodate all future uses on site, as determined by the parking justification letter; and
3. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate
vicinity of the proposed use because the proposed number of parking spaces within the Property
is sufficient to accommodate all future uses on site, as determined by the parking justification
letter; and
4. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic
congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use because the
project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the property and are designed to allow
for adequate on-site circulation; and
- 4 - PC2016-***
5. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular
ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of
the proposed use because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points that are
designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and, therefore, will not impede vehicular ingress
to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the
Property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05857 and Variance No. 2016-05071, contingent
upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to
the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval
may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with
conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning and Building Director upon a showing
of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and
purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant
has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this
permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of
the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
- 5 - PC2016-***
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
July 11, 2016. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 11, 2016, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 11th day of July, 2016.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 6 - PC2016-***
- 7 - PC2016-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071
(DEV2016-00010)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
1 An Encroachment Permit from Caltrans shall be obtained for the pole
sign fronting the Caltrans right-of-way on Beach Boulevard.
Public Works
Development Services
2 The applicant shall submit to the Public Works Department,
Development Services Division for review and approval a Water
Quality Management Plan that conforms with current Orange County
Guidelines and Requirements as well as the City’s WQMP Review
Checklist. Said WQMP shall:
• Address Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) such
as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability,
minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating
reduced or “zero discharge” areas, and conserving natural areas.
• Incorporate applicable Routine Source Control BMPs.
• Incorporate Treatment Control BMPs.
• Describe the long-term operation and maintenance, identifies the
responsible parties, and funding mechanisms for the Treatment
Control BMPs
Public Works
Development
Services
3 The project’s Final Grading, Soils, and Drainage Reports shall be
submitted for review and approval to the Development Services
Division.
Public Works
Development
Services
4 The property owner shall submit project improvement plans that
incorporate the required drainage improvements and the mechanisms
proposed in the approved Final Drainage Report. No offsite run-off shall
be blocked during and after grading operations or perimeter wall
construction. Finish floor elevations shall be 1-ft. minimum above water
surface elevations of 100-year event.
Public Works
Development
Services
5 The final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted
for review and approval to Public Works Development Services and
comply with the most current requirements of the Orange County
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP).
Public Works
Development
Services
- 8 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
6 The applicant shall demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under
California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with
Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI)
submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the
subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge
Identification (WDID) Number. The applicant shall prepare and
implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of
the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for
City review upon request.
Public Works
Development
Services
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
7 Prior to the issuance of a building permit and under the circumstances
where the owner/applicant elects to have vehicular access to its property
over and across that certain adjacent property upon which an automotive
service station is now located to and from Beach Boulevard, the
owner/applicant shall enter into an unsubordinated easement agreement
with the owner of said adjacent property, providing for said vehicular
access over and across said adjacent property to and from Beach
Boluevard. The unsubordinated easement agreement shall be in a form
satisfactory to the City Attorney and approved by the Director of the
Planning and Building Department and the Director of Public Works
prior and as a condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit
and following approval thereof shall be recorded in the Official Records
of the County of Orange. A copy of the recorded easement agreement
shall then be submitted to the Planning Division of the Planning and
Building Department.
Planning Division
8 Final detailed landscape and irrigation plans submitted for Planning
staff review and approval shall reflect the site plan as approved by the
Planning Commission. If no Beach Boulevard access is provided, then
the western portion of the site adjacent to Beach Boulevard shall be
planted with decorative landscaping to deter loitering in this area to the
satisfaction of Planning and Police Department staff.
Planning Division
9 Trash enclosures should not block visibility of doors or windows or be
located close enough to the structure to provide access to the roof. Police Department
10 That a private water system with separate water service for fire
protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans
submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
11 That a private water system with separate water service for fire
protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans
submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
- 9 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
12 That all backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of
the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets
and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will
have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water
system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water
Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully
screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be
specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and
Cross Connection Control Inspector.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
13 That all requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire
lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of
existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be
coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the
Anaheim Public Utilities Department.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
14 That all existing water services and fire services shall conform to
current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service
and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if
continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no
longer needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to
upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
15 That the Car Wash shall comply with all state laws and local ordinances
for Water Conservation Measures, including Chapter 10.18 of Anaheim
Municipal Code and Ordinance relating to Water Reduction provisions.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
16 That the developer/owner shall submit to the Public Utilities
Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum
fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the
project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the
existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-
site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be
done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates,
Rules, and Regulations.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
17 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property
owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to
establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system
plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related
technical drawings and specifications.
Public Utilities,
Electrical
Engineering
18 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate in a signed deed
to the City of Anaheim an easement 60- feet in width from the
centerline of Ball Road for road, public utilities, and other public
purposes.
Public Works
Development
Services
- 10 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
19 The developer shall submit street improvement plans, obtain a right of
way construction permit, and post a security (Performance and Labor &
Materials Bonds) for the construction of all required public
improvements within the City street right of way of Ball Road.
Public Works
Development
Services
20 An Encroachment Permit from Caltrans shall be obtained for all work
performed in Caltrans right-of-way within Beach Boulevard.
Public Works
Development
Services
21 The legal property owner shall submit an application for a Subdivision
Map Act Certificate of Compliance to the Public Works Department,
Development Services Division. A Certificate of Compliance or
Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall be approved by the City
Surveyor and recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder
prior to issuance of a building permit for the new car wash construction.
Public Works
Development
Services
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTION
22 All required on-site Water Quality Management Plan and public right of
way improvements shall be completed, operational, and are subject to
review and approval by the Construction Services Inspector.
Public Works
Development
Services
23 An 8-foot high concrete block wall with 7 feet of transparent material
on top of the wall shall be installed on the north property line as
described in the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis memorandum
(dated June 9, 2016) prepared by LSA Associates.
Planning Division
24 Owner shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the
water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line
and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department
Water Engineering Division requirements.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
25 Curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red to prohibit parallel
parking in the drive aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled on
building plans.
Public Works
Traffic Engineering
26 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to
the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as
shown on the approved utility service plan.
Public Utilities,
Electrical
Engineering
27 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit
payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees.
Public Utilities,
Electrical
Engineering
28 Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize
observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security
planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines.
Police Department
29 Trees should not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy
access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult. Police Department
- 11 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
30 Building shall be equipped with a comprehensive security surveillance
camera and alarm system (silent or audible) for the following coverage
areas:
• High value storage area
• Cash/Coin machine/room
Police Department
31 Whenever possible, open fencing design, such as wrought iron or
tubular steel, should be utilized to maximize natural surveillance while
enhancing territorial reinforcement.
Police Department
32 Minimum recommended lighting level in all parking lots is .5 foot-
candle maintained, measured at the parking surface, with a maximum to
minimum ratio no greater than 15:1.
Police Department
33 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the entrances of parking
lots/structures and located in other appropriate places. Signs must be at
least 2’ x 1’ in overall size, with white background and black 2”
lettering.
Police Department
34 All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per
22658(a) C.V.C., to assist in removal of vehicles at the property
owners/managers request.
Police Department
35 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL listed
meter, Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator Register, no
equals.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
36 That the developer/owner shall provide the Planning Department with
detailed plans for a decorative vehicular gate in accordance with City
Standard Detail No. 475 to secure the parking/vacuum area at close of
business to prevent unauthorized parking and overnight camping.
Planning Division
37 That the developer/owner shall work with Planning staff on determining
a final color scheme for the exterior façade of the automotive washing
tunnel.
Planning Division
38 Parking lot striping shall be provided, per City Standard Detail No. 470.
Disabled parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with the
Americans Department with Disabilities Act and City Standard Detail
No. 436-G.
Planning Division
39 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds
contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient
wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of
darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person,
property, and vehicles on-site. All exterior doors shall have their own
light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to
Planning Division
- 12 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises
and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building.
Addresses shall be well lighted during hours of darkness. Minimum
recommended lighting level in all parking lots is .5 foot-candle
maintained, measured at the parking surface, with a maximum to
minimum ratio no greater than 15:1.
40 Landscaping shall be provided around the above ground large meter or
fire service to shield from view of street. Planning Division
41 All plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior
of the building shall be fully screened by architectural devices and/or
appropriate building materials. Said information shall be specifically
shown on the plans submitted for building permits.
Planning Division
42 Landscaping shall be provided around the trash enclosure and HVAC
equipment enclosure. Planning Division
ON-GOING DURING PROJECT OPERATIONS
43 The fabric canopies of the proposed canopy structures shall be
perpetually maintained and replaced as needed to ensure that the
carwash facility maintains a high quality appearance. Planning Division
44 Should the vehicle queue reach Ball Road, staff members shall be
positioned at the end of the on-site queue area near the Ball Road
entrance to direct traffic and prevent the queue from spilling onto Ball
Road. This measure shall be implemented for a short timeframe, as
needed, until the queue dissipates.
Public Works Traffic
Engineering
45 All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall
adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate
illumination for persons exiting the building.
Police Department
46 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds
contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient
wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of
darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person,
property, and vehicles on-site.
Police Department
47 Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during hours of
darkness. Police Department
48 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from
the street. Number should be illuminated during hours of darkness.
Police Department
- 13 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
49 The parking/vacuuming area shall be secured at close of business to
prevent unauthorized parking and overnight camping. Police Department
50 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent
area under the control of the property owner shall be removed or painted
over within 24 hours of being applied.
Code Enforcement
51 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the premises in an
orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and
removal of trash or debris.
Planning
Division/Code
Enforcement
52 All automotive washing employees shall be required to park on the
subject property. Planning Division
53 The use of the vacuum equipped stalls shall not be limited to customers
vacuuming their cars. Planning Division
54 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for
outdoor storage. Planning Division
55 The car wash facility shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of
Operation submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the
business operation as described in the Letter of Operation shall be
subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine
substantial conformance with the Letter of Operation and to ensure
compatibility with the surrounding uses. The facility shall operate from
7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. seven days a week. All wash equipment and
vacuums will be shut off at the end of the day 9:00 p.m. The hours of
operation may be modified subject to prior review and approval by
Planning staff.
Planning Division
GENERAL
56 Any future modification to the approved site plans for access from
Beach Boulevard shall be reviewed and approved by Caltrans, the
Director of Planning and Building, and the Director of Public Works to
determine substantial conformance with the approved site plans and to
ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses and traffic patterns.
Planning Division
Public Works
Traffic Engineering
57 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and
its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to
individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims,
actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review,
set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this
permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or
made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality
or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s
indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages,
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
- 14 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs
of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees
and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in
connection with such proceeding.
58 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the
issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits
for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall
result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the
revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and
Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
59 The business premises shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
petitioner, which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as
conditioned herein.
Planning and
Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
Anaheim Express Car Wash
Operations
June 30th, 2016
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
OVERVIEW
THE CAR WASH INDUSTRY IS IN A STATE OF TRANSFORMATION. THE TYPICAL FULL-SERVICE CAR
WASHES USUALLY INVOLVE LONG WAIT TIMES AND HIGH OPERATIONAL COSTS INCLUDING NUMEROUS
EMPLOYEES. THE NEW EXPRESS CAR WASH MODEL PROVIDES A SPEED AND VALUE PROPOSITION FOR
THE CUSTOMER. UTILIZING THIS APPROACH, A CLEAN, SHINY CAR CAN BE PRODUCED IN 2 MINUTES OR
LESS. THE EXPRESS CAR WASH UTILIZES TECHNOLOGICALLY IMPROVED CAR WASH EQUIPMENT TO
QUICKLY PRODUCE A CLEAN CAR IN AN ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY LOCALE WITH MINIMAL
EMPLOYEES.
ANAHEIM EXPRESS CAR WASH WILL OPERATE A PROFESSIONAL AND MODERN EXPRESS CAR WASH AT
BEACH BOULEVARD AND BALL ROAD IN ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA. THE CAR WASH WILL
WRAP AROUND A CHEVRON STATION THAT IS AT THE CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION. THE BUSINESS
WILL OPERATE IN A TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED, HIGH SPEED AND AUTOMATED CAR WASH TUNNEL.
IT WILL UTILIZE THE MOST ADVANCED CAR WASH EQUPMENT IN THE INDUSTRY. THE STATE-OF-THE-
ART FACILITY WILL HAVE 3 PAY STATIONS, 26 SELF-VACUUM SPACES AND WILL COMPLETE WASHES IN 2
MINUTES OR LESS.THE CUSTOMERS WILL REMAIN IN THEIR VEHICLES THROUGHOUT THE PAYMENT AND
CAR WASH PROCESS AND WILL HAVE THE OPTION TO UTILIZE FREE VACUUMS EITHER BEFORE OR AFTER
THE CAR WASH. CAR WASHES WILL BE SOLD TO THE CUSTOMERS DIRECTLY AT THE POINT OF SALE
AUTOMATED PAY STATIONS. THE PAY STATIONS ALLOW CUSTOMERS TO CHOOSE THE SERVICES THAT
THEY WANT. THE MENU WILL OFFER A VARIETY OF WASH PACKAGES WITH PRICES RANGING FROM $6
TO $15. THESE AUTOMATED KIOSKS WILL PROVIDE FAST AND EFFICIENT POINT OF SALE SERVICE
RESULTING IN A SEAMLESS TRANSACTION. A LARGE 140 ft WASH TUNNEL WITH STATE-OF-THE-ART
TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT WILL PROVIDE A CLEAN, DRY AND SHINY CAR IN 2 MINUTES OR LESS. THE
FREE VACUUM SERVICE WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ALL CUSTOMERS. VENDING MACHINES WILL BE
AVAILABLE TO PROVIDE CAR DETAILING SUPPLIES AND BEVERAGES. THE CAR WASH WILL HAVE 3 TO 5
EMPLOYEES ON SITE DURING OPERATING HOURS (7:00 AM TO 9:00 PM).
The number of employees working at any time is dependent on how busy the car wash is.
More employees will be working during the hours that the car wash is expected to be operating
at or near full capacity. Full-time employees will work 2 shifts, either from 7:00 am to 2:00 pm
or from 2:00 pm to 9:00 pm. Part-time employees will be utilized to fill in during the busier
periods. The employees will park in the vacuum spaces. Based off industry standards, it is
expected that 60% of the customers will utilize the free vacuums for a period of approximately
10 minutes per car. Thus, on average each hour during a busy period, 72 cars will utilize the
vacuums for 10 minutes each. This represents vacuum utilization of approximately 50% and
consequently, provides more than adequate parking for the employees.
FROM AN ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVE, THE CAR WASH EXPECTS TO RECYCLE AT LEAST 80% OF THE
WATER UTILIZED DURING THE WASH PROCESS. THE OVERALL OBJECTIVE OF ANAHEIM EXPRESS CAR
WASH WILL BE TO PROVIDE THE HIGHEST QUALITY OF CLEAN CARS AND CUSTOMER SERVICE IN A
WARM AND ENVIRONMENTALLY
FRIENDLY ATMOSPHERE IN A TIMELY MANNER.
The equipment package that will be utilized will be Motor City equipment, we
expect that 120 cars will be able to be washed in a hour at an average conveyor
speed. It is expected that each wash will take 2 minutes or less. The important
factor in why we are building a 140 foot tunnel is that as many as 6 cars can be in
the tunnel at once being washed. Thus, even though each car may take 2 minutes
to complete a single car wash, there can be numerous cars in the tunnel at once at
various stages of the wash process.
Thus, in all possible scenarios we believe that the queue space is more than
adequate. Even if the maximum peak hour trips increases, we believe that we can
comfortably wash 120 cars per hour and thus, even then only possibly utilize only
a small portion of the available queue space. In addition, we have viewed
numerous car washes and have not seen any with more than 20 queue spaces
CAR WASH TRIPS
THE CONCLUSIONS REACHED IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS ARE THE RESULT OF ANALYSIS BY NOT
ONLY THE ANAHEIM EXPRESS CAR WASH PERSONNEL BUT ALSO INCLUDE SIGNIFICANT INPUT FROM
2 CAR WASH INDUSTRY-WIDE EXPERTS THAT HAVE PROVIDED EXPERTISE AND WORKED WITH
NUMEROUS EXPRESS CAR WASHES IN CALIFORNIA AND ARIZONA.
AFTER EXPERIENCING VARIOUS GROWTH STAGES OF THE BUSINESS WITHIN THE FIRST COUPLE OF
YEARS, IT IS EXPECTED THAT THE CAR WASH VOLUME WILL STABILIZE AT APPROXIMATELY 20,000 CARS
PER MONTH. THE NUMBER OF CARS WASHED IN A PERIOD IS PRIMARILY INFLUENCED BY THE TRAFFIC
COUNT OF THE ROADS ON WHICH THE CAR WASH IS LOCATED, THE DENSITY OF THE POPULATION,
THE PROXIMITY OF ANY COMPETITION AND THE WEATHER PATTERNS. IN ADDITION, IT WAS NOTED
THAT TYPICALLY THE BUSIEST DAYS WERE SATURDAY, FRIDAY AND SUNDAY AND THAT THE PEAK HOURS
FOR ALL DAYS WERE FROM 10:00 AM TO 2:00 PM. THERE ALSO MIGHT BE A SLIGHT PEAK FROM 6:00
PM TO 7:00 PM. TAKING INTO ACCOUNT ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED FACTORS, THE BUSINESS
ANTICIPATES THAT THE MAXIMUM PEAK HOUR TRIPS WOULD APPROXIMATE 90 TRIPS PER HOUR.
THOUGH THE NUMBER OF TRIPS TO THE LOCATION DURING A DAY OR MONTH IS SIGNIFICANT, IT IS
NOT ANTICIPATED THAT THESE TRIPS WILL INCREASE THE OVERALL TRAFFIC ON BEACH BOULEVARD
AND BALL ROAD. THE TRAFFIC TO THE TYPICAL CAR WASH IS USUALLY NOT DESTINATION BASED BUT
RATHER IS USUALLY MORE OF AN IMPULSE DECISION. THUS, THE CAR WASH WILL DIVERT TRAFFIC OFF
OF BEACH AND BALL RATHER THAN ADD TO THE OVERALL TRAFFIC COUNTS OF THESE STREETS. IT IS
ANTICIPATED THAT THE MAJORITY OF PROSPECTIVE CUSTOMERS WILL NOTICE THE CAR WASH WHILE
RUNNING OTHER ERRANDS AND MAKE AN IMPULSE DECISION TO QUICKLY GET THEIR CAR CLEANED.
CONSEQUENTLY, THE CAR WASH IS NOT EXPECTED TO INCREASE THE OVERALL TRAFFIC.
GOALS
1) TO OWN AND OPERATE AN EXTREMELY EFFICIENT EXPRESS CAR WASH PROVIDING A VALUABLE
SERVICE FOR CUSTOMERS AND RESULTING IN A PROFITABLE BUSINESS VENTURE.
2) TO WASH OVER 22,000 CARS PER MONTH BY THE END OF THE FIRST YEAR.
3) ACHIEVE AN AVERAGE TICKET PRICE OF AT LEAST $8.00 PER CAR.
4) ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A COST STRUCTURE THAT IS REASONABLE FOR THIS BUSINESS
MODEL.
5) CREATE A BUSINESS MODEL THAT IS ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY SUCH THAT MOST OF THE
WATER IS RECYCLED.
6) REFINE THE OPERATIONAL PRACTICES SO THAT THE BUSINESS MAY FUNCTION AS A
STANDARDIZED, REPEATABLE AND EFFICIENT PROCESS.
KEYS TO SUCCESS
1) LOCATION - ANAHEIM EXPRESS CAR WASH WILL BE LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF BEACH
BOULEVARD AND BALL ROAD IN ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA. BEACH BOULEVARD IS AN EXTREMELY
BUSY STREET AND THE TRAFFIC COUNT FOR THIS INTERSECTION IS APPROXIMATELY 74,000
CARS PER DAY. THE CAR WASH WRAPS AROUND A CHEVRON STATION THAT IS LOCATED AT THE
CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION. THE BUSINESSES OF THE CAR WASH AND GAS STATION WILL
COMPLEMENT EACH OTHER AND RESULT IN ADDED REVENUES FOR BOTH BUSINESSES. IN
ADDITION, THE AREA IS VERY DENSELY POPULATED.
2) COMPETITION – NO OTHER COMPARABLE EXPRESS CAR WASH IS LOCATED WITHIN A THREE
MILE RADIUS, RESULTING IN A UNIQUE VALUE PROPOSITION FOR THIS CAR WASH.
3) CAR WASH EXPERIENCE – THE CAR WASH ENVIROMENT WILL BE AN INVITING, CLEAN AND
FRIENDLY ATMOSPHERE. THE TUNNEL AND THE RELATED EQUIPMENT WILL BE STATE OF THE
ART, RESULTING IN A QUICK, CLEAN CAR WASH. AUTOMATED KIOSKS WILL PROVIDE FAST AND
EFFICIENT POINT 0F SALE SERVICE RESULTING IN A SEAMLESS PROCESS.
4) MANAGEMENT – THE MANAGEMENT TEAM HAS SIGNIFICANT EXPERIENCE IN BUSINESS START-
UPS, COST CONTROL, OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND LONG-RANGE GROWTH STRATEGIES.
THEY HAVE ALSO PARTNERED WITH JIM RAFFERTY, THE OWNER AND HEAD CONSULTANT FOR
THE CAR WASH MARKETING GROUP. JIM HAS OVER 18 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN THE CAR
WASH INDUSTRY AND HAS OPENED NUMEROUS EXPRESS CAR WASHES IN BOTH ARIZONA AND
CALIFORNIA. MR. RAFFERTY WILL PLAY A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN ALL ASPECTS OF THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THIS CAR WASH.
LOCATION AND FACILITIES
1) LOCATION - THE CAR WASH IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF BEACH BOULEVARD AND BALL
ROAD IN ANAHEIM CALIFONIA. AT THE CORNER OF THIS VERY BUSY INTERSECTION IS A
CHEVRON STATION AROUND WHICH THE CAR WASH IS LOCATED. THESE TWO BUSINESSES
COMPLEMENT ONE ANOTHER AND WILL ENHANCE THE REVENUES OF THE OTHER BUSINESS.
2) CAR WASH TUNNEL – THE CARS WILL BE WASHED IN A NEW, FULLY AUTOMATED 140 FOOT
TUNNEL WHICH WILL INCLUDE STATE OF THE ART EQUIPMENT, RESULTING IN A QUICK,
QUALITY WASH FOR CUSTOMERS. CARS WILL BE ABLE TO BE LOADED ONTO THE CONVEYOR
EVERY 20 SECONDS AND THE CAR WASH SHOULD TAKE NO MORE THAN 2 MINUTES.
3) VACUUMS AND PAY STATIONS – THE STATE OF THE ART FACILITY WILL INCLUDE THREE
AUTOMATED PAY STATIONS AND 26 SELF-SERVICE VACUUM STATIONS. THE VACUUM SYSTEM
IS DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN CONSISTENT SUCTION STRENGTH REGARDLESS OF HOW MANY
VACUUM STALLS ARE BEING USED.
4) VENDING MACHINES – VENDING MACHINES WILL ALLOW CUSTOMERS TO PURCHASE VARIOUS
SELF-DETAILING PRODUCTS AND BEVERAGES, THUS PROVIDING ADDED REVENUES FOR THE
BUSINESS.
PROJECT BUDGET
- THE OVERALL BUDGET FOR THE PROJECT IS $7.3M. THIS PRICE INCLUDES THE ACQUISITION OF
THE LAND, DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW TUNNEL,
STATE OF THE ART EQUIPMENT AND VACUUMS WITH CANOPIES.
- THE DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT FOR THIS LOCATION IS APPROXIMATELY 74,000 CARS WHICH
REPRESENTS A VERY SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC FLOW.
- THE CAPTURE RATE FOR THE FIRST YEAR IS ASSUMED TO BE 1%. CAPTURE RATES USUALLY
RANGE FROM .75% TO 1.5%.
- THERE IS NO SIGNIFCANT COMPETITOR WITHIN A THREE MILE RADIUS.
- THE AVERAGE REVENUE IS EXPECTED TO BE IN EXCESS OF $8 PER CAR. CAR WASHES WILL BE
OFFERED AT $6.00 $10.00 AND $15.00. IT IS ANTICPATED THAT SLIGHTLY GREATER THAN HALF
OF THE CAR WASHES WILL BE AT THE $6.00 LEVEL. IN ADDITION, VARIOUS TYPES OF MONTHLY
PASSES WILL BE OFFERED AT ALL PRICE LEVELS.
- THE OVERALL PROJECTED RESULTS ARE BASED ON CONSERVATIVE ASSUMPTIONS WHICH
APPEAR TO BE VERY REASONABLE CONSIDERING THE DEMPGRAPHICS OF THE AREA, THE
PROPOSED BUSINESS MODEL AND OTHER CAR WASHES IN SIMILAR AREAS.
SUMMARY
ANAHEIM EXPRESS CAR WASH WILL PROVIDE A MUCH NEEDED SERVICE IN AN IDEAL GEOGRAPHICAL
AREA. THIS EXPRESS CAR WASH MODEL WILL GIVE THE CUSTOMER A QUICK CAR WASH AND A CLEAN
CAR AT A REASONABLE PRICE. UTILIZING STATE OF THE ART EQUIPMENT, THE CUSTOMER WILL BE ABLE
TO BE IN AND OUT OF THE CAR WASH IN A FEW MIINUTES. IN ADDITION, THE CUSTOMER HAS THE
OPTION TO VACUUM HIS CAR EITHER BEFORE OR AFTER THE CAR WASH. THE POSITIVE ASPECTS OF
THIS LOCATION INCLUDE SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC COUNTS, A DENSELY POPULATED AREA, LIMITED
COMPETITION AND A NEIGHBORING GAS STATION WHICH SHOULD COMPLEMENT THE BUSINESS OF
THE CAR WASH. FINALLY, THIS BUSINESS WILL ALSO POSITIVELY IMPACT THE ENVIRONMENT BY
RECYCLING MORE THAN 80% OF THE WATER UTILIZED.
Justification for Waiver/Variance
City of Anaheim
Automated Car Wash Parking Lot
924 S. Beach Blvd.
1. The Anaheim Municipal Code, has established that the proposed use, an
automated car wash, in this particular zone classification, is permitted subject to
the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. No specific parking requirement is
listed for this particular use, therefore a waiver of AMC 18.74.060 is requested.
2. The proposed use, contains a combination parking lot and vacuum service area,
which will not adversely impact the neighbors due to its passive nature.
3. There are a number of similar land uses, in Anaheim, in similar zones that have
proven the use is compatible with the surrounding area and that the vacuum area
adequately serves as parking for all the car wash customers.
4. The size and shape of the property is ideally suited for this land use. The
property is sufficient in size to accommodate any anticipated growth in business.
5. The shape of the property provides for easy ingress/egress.
6. The building and operation of the car wash will not adversely impact the health or
safety of the citizens of Anaheim.
7. The daily traffic, as well as the peak hour traffic, for this land use will be well
within the guidelines for the utilization of the adjoining streets. Compared to other
permitted uses in the zone, this land use will generate less traffic on a daily and
peak hour basis.
8. Approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit, with attendant conditions, will
not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the citizens of Anaheim. This
is a land use that will assist the businesses and citizens.
Prepared by
Phillip R. Schwartze
Agent for the landowner and applicant.
Justification for Conditional Use Permit
924 South Beach Blvd.
Automated Car Wash
1. The Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) provides for car wash and ancillary facilities
in a Commercial Area subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The
property is zoned and General Planned for Commercial Uses.
2. The existing building on the site, an old motel, is functionally obsolete. An
automated car wash is ideally suited for this site. There is easy access from Ball
Road and Beach Blvd. The proposed location is adjacent to non-residential uses.
The proposed hours of operation will primarily be weekend and weekdays and
early evenings.
3. The proposed building site has more than sufficient parking to accommodate the
limited number of workers as well as automobile stacking lanes for patrons in line
to utilize the facility.
4. The patrons have more than sufficient on-site parking for their detailing needs
while also accommodating the employee/ staff parking for the automated car
wash. Traffic generated will normally be in the “non-peak” hours. No large trucks
will access the site, hours of operation will be mostly opposite the neighboring
uses and no noise, dust, vibration or lighting will impact the neighbors.
5. Re-use of this building location will provide a good neighboring relationship to the
existing surrounding uses while eliminating an existing use that has caused
Police problems. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will provide a
needed facility in an ideal location with no impacts to the neighbors or
businesses.
Prepared by
Phillip R. Schwartze – Agent for owner
BEACH BLVD.
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
3
BEACH BLVD.
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
A
L
T
B
A
-
2
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
E
X
P
R
E
S
S
W
A
S
H
9
2
6
S
B
e
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
4
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
B
y
:
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
W
a
s
h
L
L
C
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
4
BEACH BLVD.
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
A
L
T
C
A
-
3
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
E
X
P
R
E
S
S
W
A
S
H
9
2
6
S
B
e
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
4
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
B
y
:
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
W
a
s
h
L
L
C
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
5
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH 926 S Beach Blvd Anaheim, CA 92804 Developed By:Anaheim Express Wash LLC FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS A-6
SO
U
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
WE
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH 926 S Beach Blvd Anaheim, CA 92804 Developed By:Anaheim Express Wash LLC FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS A-7
NO
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
EA
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH 926 S Beach Blvd Anaheim, CA 92804 Developed By:Anaheim Express Wash LLC 3D IMAGES A-8
AE
R
I
A
L
V
I
E
W
F
R
O
M
W
E
S
T
AE
R
I
A
L
V
I
E
W
F
R
O
M
E
A
S
T
VI
E
W
F
R
O
M
W
E
S
T
-
C
A
R
W
A
S
H
E
X
I
T
L
A
N
E
VI
E
W
F
R
O
M
E
A
S
T
-
C
A
R
W
A
S
H
E
N
T
R
Y
L
A
N
E
S
ST
R
E
E
T
V
I
E
W
F
R
O
M
B
E
A
C
H
B
L
V
D
.
ST
R
E
E
T
V
I
E
W
F
R
O
M
B
A
L
L
R
D
.
F
R
O
M
W
E
S
T
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH 926 S Beach Blvd Anaheim, CA 92804 Developed By:Anaheim Express Wash LLC FLOOR PLANS A-4
EQ
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
P
L
A
N
CA
R
W
A
S
H
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
TR
A
S
H
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
P
L
A
N
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH 926 S Beach Blvd Anaheim, CA 92804 Developed By:Anaheim Express Wash LLC ROOF PLANS A-5
:HVW$QDKHLP6WUHHW
/RQJ%HDFK&DOLIRUQLD
3KRQH
)DFVLPLOH
ZZZVXSHULRUVLJQVFRP
3URMHFW
$FFRXQW0DQDJHU
'HVLJQHU
6FDOH
'HVLJQ1R
'DWH
3DJH
5HJ1R
5HYLVLRQV
7KLVLVDQRULJLQDOXQSXEOLVKHGGUDZLQJFUHDWHG
E\6XSHULRU(OHFWULFDO$GYHUWLVLQJ,QF,WLV
VXEPLWWHGIRU\RXUDSSURYDO,WLVQRWWREHVKRZQ
WRDQ\RQHRXWVLGHRI\RXURUJDQL]DWLRQQRULVLW
WREHUHSURGXFHGFRSLHGRUH[KLELWHGLQDQ\
IDVKLRQ7KHFKDQJLQJRIFRORUVVL]HVPDWHULDOV
RULOOXPLQDWLRQPHWKRGGRHVQRWDOWHUWKHGHVLJQ
2ZQHUVKLSRIWKLVGHVLJQLVKHOGE\6XSHULRU
(OHFWULFDO$GYHUWLVLQJ,QF$XWKRUL]DWLRQWRXVH
WKLVGHVLJQLQDQ\IDVKLRQPXVWEHREWDLQHGLQ
ZULWLQJIURP6XSHULRU(OHFWULFDO$GYHUWLVLQJ,QF
1RWH 7KH&RORUVGHSLFWHGKHUHDUHDJUDSKLF
UHSUHVHQWDWLRQ$FWXDOFRORUVPD\YDU\
6HHFRORUVSHFLILFDWLRQV
6($F
2I
$GGUHVV
)25-2%&+(&. '$7(
$FFW0JU
$FFW0JU
$FFW0JU
'HVLJQ
3URGXFWLRQ
$33529$/6
)25&216758&7,21 '$7(
)25,167$//21/< '$7(
$6127('
&<17+,$/,0$
$1$+(,0(;35(66
&$5:$6+
6%HDFK%OYG :%DOO5G
$QDKHLP&D
5 SO UHY³&DU:DVK´
OD\RXWRQDOOVLJQV
5 SO UHYSHU&/
5 SO UHORFDWHVLJQ(
5 SO DGGH[LVWVLJQOD\RXW
RQ6LJQ%
3O
· µ
$
%
·[·YLVLELOLW\
WULDQJOH
·[·YLVLELOLW\
WULDQJOH
%(
$
&
+
%
/
9
'
:%$//52$'
&/
6,*1/2&$7,213/$1 (1/$5*('9,(:
6&$/( µ ·µ
[·YLVLELOL
7KLVLVDQ
RDQ7K
RULJLQDOX
Q
S
X
E
EOLVKHGG
U
D
Z
L
Q
J
F
U
H
D
W
H
G
E
\
6
X
S
H
U
L
R
WHW
VK HGHGGGUDZUDZZLQZLQJJ
F
U
H
FUH D
VKHKHGGGGGGUGU DZZL QJLQJFJFUHHD GE\6XS
HSSSSSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHHHHHHH6DW
VK
DW
V
Z JF DWWHHDWHG
EOOL VEL K HGEOLVK
WHHGG E \\\666XX SSHHHUUL R
WHHGG EE \\\66X6X S HSHUUL
HGWHG \E \\66 X6X SS HUH RULRU(OHFWUL
F
D
O
(OHFWULF(OHFWUFWUL FDOWURUU((O F WURRUU((O F WRRU(U (O HF W
RVV7
RRRRRRRR
DWHGDWDWDWWHHDWHGWWW
R
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
Y
,QF
,
W
L
V
V
X
E
P
L
W
W
H
G
I
R
U
\
R
X
U
D
S
S
U
R
Y
D
O
J,QF,WWJ,
LV
V
V&/&
,WLVQRW
W
R
WR
W
EHVKRZQ
W
R
D
DQ\RQHR
X
W
V
L
G
H
R
I
\
R
\R\QHQHRRXRXWV LGHGH RIRI\\\R
\R\RQ HQHRRX WVWVLGLG HRHRII\I \R\RR
\R\
V
R
W V GH
R
I
\UJDQL]DWL
RDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWLDWLDWLDWLDWLDWLWWDDQQRUJDQL]DJDQL]]D WW RJDQL]]DDWWL RJDQ]L]D LRWRQQRULV
L
W
W
R
E
H
U
H
S
U
R
G
X
EH
U
H
S
EH
U
H
S
UHSSURRGH
LVLWW
R Q QQ R U L VV LWW WW R E HH U S
RQQ QQRR U L VV LWW WW R E HH U S
QR QQ R LU VLV LW WW RW ER HEH U HS
G
R
U
H
[
K
L
E
L
W
H
G
L
Q
D
Q
\
I
D
V
K
L
R
Q
GXFHGFR
S
L
H
G
R
U
H
[
SLHGR
G
RURR [
SX
RW
EEEEEEEE
RXURUJDQ
L
]
DRUJJJJJJJJJJJJJRRXRXUURRUUJJ DDQQ L
RXURUJDQ
L
]
D
X U R U JJ DQXURRJDQXURJJDQ
GX
LR
SU
7KHFKDQ
J
L
Q
J
R
I
F
R
O
R
U
V
RUVVLRUV
V
L
]
H
V
P
D
W
H
U
L
D
O
V
R
U
L
O
O
X
P
L
R V
V
UV
V
V
V
V L]VL]HVHV
P
P DWDWHUULDOVDOV R
VLVL]]HVHVPVPDPDW HUWHULDLD OVVRRR
PD
LOOXPLQLOOXPQ
UV
U L O OXX PULOOXXP QULOXOXPQ
RUV
V
FK
RQ
P
H
W
K
R
G
G
R
H
V
Q
R
W
D
O
W
H
U
KRGGRHV
VVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Q P HRQ
P
H
W
Q P H W KK RRGGG GG RRHH V Q RRRW D OWWHH
Q P H W KK RRGGG GG RRH VHV QQ RRW DD OWWH
Q P H KHWKRK GRGG RG HRH V Q R WRW D WHOWH
RI
W
K
L
V
G
H
V
L
J
Q
L
V
HUWKHGH
V
L
J
Q
2
Z
Q
H
U
V
K
L
S
R
I
W
K
L
V
ZQHUV
WKH
G
H
V
L
J
WKH
G
H
V
J
KL
GHHVL JQ ZQ U
JQK
WWKKRI
VLJJJJ
U W K HH GH V J
K
HUU W K HH GH
K
U W KHKH GH
K
DHHDDD
LOOXPLQDW
L
R
Q
P
H
W
LQDWLQLQLQLQLLQLQPLQPLQPLPLQPLQDDDPLQPLQDDPPLQLQDQDLQLQDDWPPQDQDLQLQLLQDWQDWLQLQLQLQLLQLQQDWQDWLQLQLQQDWQDWQDWQDWQDWQDQQQQQQDWQDWQLQQDWQDWQLQDWDWQQDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWDWLDWLDWLDWLWLWLWLWLWLWLWWLWLRWLWLRWLRWLRWLRWLR
LO O XXPPP LQQ DDWWL RR Q PP
LOOXPLQDW
L
R
Q
P
H
W
LOOX P QOXPPLQQ D W LRLR Q P
O X PP LQQ D W LLRR Q P
O X PP QLQ D LRWRL QQ P
WHUW
KHOGE\6
X
S
H
U
L
R
U
(
O
ULRU
(
O
H
F
W
(OHFWULFDO
U(OHFW
\6X
U
(
O
H
F
W
\6X
U (OHFFW ULFULFD O(OHH FWUWULFFDODOO
6
WHF(OLU
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
,
Q
F
$$$$
,QF,QF
$GGG YYHH UW L V L Q JJJ QQ F
$GGG Y HHUUW L V L JJ QQ F
G$G YG HYH UW VWL L JJ J ,Q FQ,QF,QQ F,QF,QFQ,QFQ $$$$$$$XWKRUL]D
W
L
R
Q
W
R
X
V
H
W
K
L
V
G
H
V
L
J
Q
L
Q
D
Q
\
I
D
V
K
L
R
Q
IDVK
LQ
D
Q
\
QLQDQ\DDQ\\IDDQD\QQRQQQ
LQ
D
QDQD
WKRUL]DWL
R
RRRRRRLRRLRLRLRLRLRLL
VKLVGHVL
WWKK RU$XWKRUL]K RUUL ]D W L R QQ W R X VVHH W KKLKL VV GG HHHVV LJJ Q L Q D \
W K RU L ]D W LRR Q WRR X VVHH W KKLK V GG HHVV LJJ Q L Q D \
K RU ]UL DD LW QRQ RWR VX HVH W KWK VKL GVGHG VHV JLJ Q LQ Q D \
$XWKRUL]XWK$$XXWWKK RRU$XWKRUL]$X$$XX WK R$$$XX WK R$X$X WK R
RXWX
PXVWEHR
E
W
D
L
Q
H
G
EWDLQHG
L
Q
Z
HG
L
Q
Z
U
L
W
L
Q
J
I
U
R
P
6
X
S
H
U
L
R
U
(
O
H
ZHGLQZ
P
L H
SHULRU(UUUUHUHUULULULULHUHUULULULULULHUHU RRULRULRHUHUULRULRLLRLRRRHUHULRLRLRRRHUHURRRHUHUHURRRHURRRRHUHURRHRRHHRRHHHH UURRUURRUUHUHURRRHUHUUURRUUHUHU UUHHU UUU(U(HUHUHH U(U(HH U(U((U((((((((O(O
HGHG
LRU
(
O
H
LRRU
(
O
H
G L Q ZZ UL WW L Q JJ II URR PP 666 XXSSS H U L R U (O
G L Q ZZUUL WW LQQ JJIIUIURR PP 666 X SXSS H LRR U (O
G QL ZQZ WUL LW JQ IJ URI PRP 66 XSX6SS H L UR (O
ZL
H
G
L
Q
Z
PP
U
(
O
H
F
W
U
L
F
D
O
(O(O(O(OH(OH(O(O(O(O(O(O(OH(OHOO((H FFU
(
O
H
F
W
U
(H F W U LFF D O(H F W ULLFFDD O(H FWF LFUF OD
LRU
(
O
H
F
W
U
((((O(O((O(O(O(OLRRU((O H FLRU
(
O
H
F
W
U
LRRU
(
O
H
R (O FR(OHR(O LFFWULWFWF $GYHUWLVL
Q
J
,
Q
F
FQ,QF,Q,LWLWLGYHUWLVLQ
J
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJQJQJQQJQJQJQJQJQJQQQQ
$$$G YY HH UWWLWL V L Q JJ ,QQ F
$$G$G Y HYHUUWWLWL V L Q JJ ,QQ F
$$G$YY HH WLUW VWL QVL JJ Q,Q FF
ATTACHMENT NO. 9
:HVW$QDKHLP6WUHHW
/RQJ%HDFK&DOLIRUQLD
3KRQH
)DFVLPLOH
ZZZVXSHULRUVLJQVFRP
3URMHFW
$FFRXQW0DQDJHU
'HVLJQHU
6FDOH
'HVLJQ1R
'DWH
3DJH
5HJ1R
5HYLVLRQV
7KLVLVDQRULJLQDOXQSXEOLVKHGGUDZLQJFUHDWHG
E\6XSHULRU(OHFWULFDO$GYHUWLVLQJ,QF,WLV
VXEPLWWHGIRU\RXUDSSURYDO,WLVQRWWREHVKRZQ
WRDQ\RQHRXWVLGHRI\RXURUJDQL]DWLRQQRULVLW
WREHUHSURGXFHGFRSLHGRUH[KLELWHGLQDQ\
IDVKLRQ7KHFKDQJLQJRIFRORUVVL]HVPDWHULDOV
RULOOXPLQDWLRQPHWKRGGRHVQRWDOWHUWKHGHVLJQ
2ZQHUVKLSRIWKLVGHVLJQLVKHOGE\6XSHULRU
(OHFWULFDO$GYHUWLVLQJ,QF$XWKRUL]DWLRQWRXVH
WKLVGHVLJQLQDQ\IDVKLRQPXVWEHREWDLQHGLQ
ZULWLQJIURP6XSHULRU(OHFWULFDO$GYHUWLVLQJ,QF
1RWH 7KH&RORUVGHSLFWHGKHUHDUHDJUDSKLF
UHSUHVHQWDWLRQ$FWXDOFRORUVPD\YDU\
6HHFRORUVSHFLILFDWLRQV
6($F
2I
$GGUHVV
)25-2%&+(&. '$7(
$FFW0JU
$FFW0JU
$FFW0JU
'HVLJQ
3URGXFWLRQ
$33529$/6
)25&216758&7,21 '$7(
)25,167$//21/< '$7(
$6127('
&<17+,$/,0$
$1$+(,0(;35(66
&$5:$6+
6%HDFK%OYG :%DOO5G
$QDKHLP&D
5 SO UHY³&DU:DVK´
OD\RXWRQDOOVLJQV
5 SO UHYSHU&/
5 SO UHORFDWHVLJQ(
5 SO DGGH[LVWVLJQOD\RXW
RQ6LJQ%
3O
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$1111111$$$((((,,,,,,00001111111111$$$$$$$$$$((((((((,,,,,,,0000000
((((;;;;;;;;33333333355 666666666((((((((((;;;;;;;;;;3333333333555555555(((((((((6666666666666666666666666
·
µ
·
µ
·
µ
·
µ
·
µ
·
µ
$1$+(,0
(;35(66
·µ
·µ
·
µ
µ
µ
(;326('1(212167$5%25'(5
$/80,1805$,6('%25'(5:,7+
:+,7((;326('1(21,1)5217
(;,67,1*&$%,1(7
(;,67,1*&$%,1(7
&+$11(/3/$48( &,5&/( 3$,17('
5(' :+,7(%25'(5
(;326('%8/%6/(',//80,1$7('
3$,17('$/80,180'(&25$7('$&&(17
3$,17(':+,7(67((/5281'3,3(
6833257
)$&(/,7/('6,//80,1$7('&+$11(/
%25'(5 /(77(56
)$&(/,7/('6,//80,1$7('&+$11(/
/(77(56
)$&(/,7/('6,//80,1$7('&+$11(/
/(77(56
3$,17(':+,7(67((/5281'3,3(
6833257
5(752),7(;,67,1*'28%/(6,'(')5((67$1',1*6,*1
6&$/( µ ·µ
·
µ
·
µ
·
µ
·µ
(;,67,1*'28%/(6,'(')5((67$1',1*6,*1
6&$/( µ ·µ
·
ö
µ
´$
µ
·
µ
´:
µ
$
+++++++$$$$$$$$$$5555555555 $$$$$$$$$66666666++++++++++$$$$$$$$$$6666666666++++++++++&$5:$6+
µ
&+$11(/
·
µ
666666666++++++666666666+++++++++6+++++++++++7,1*&$%
/,7/('6
325777
(;,6
$&(
+++++++++++++++++
7(6
1(71(
·
µ
·
·
´$´
´:
µ
$$$$$$$$$$$$++++++++(((
555555555(((((((6666666
$+($$$$$$$$$+++++++++((((((($+(
5(555555555(((((((((666665(6
000000000
66666666666666
00000000000
6666666666666666
µ
(;32
$/
:+
(
)
7KLVLVDQ
R
U
L
J
L
Q
D
O
X
Q
S
X
E
O
L
V
K
H
G
G
U
D
Z
L
Q
J
F
U
H
D
W
H
G
E
\
6
X
S
H
U
L
R
U
(
O
H
FWULFDO
QDOXQSX
E
O
L
V
K
H
G
G
U
D
Z
L
Q
J
F
U
H
D
W
H
G
E
F
·
·
(
JLQJLQ XQXQ
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
,
Q
F
,
W
L
V
V
X
E
P
L
W
W
H
G
I
R
U
\
R
X
U
D
S
S
U
R
Y
D
O
VLQJ,QF
,
W
L
V
V
X
E
P
L
W
W
H
G
I
FFFFFFF FJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ J,QF
\
WLV EPL
&+$11(/3/&+$11(/3/$48$
5(' 5
,WLVQRW
W
R
E
H
V
K
R
Z
Q
W
R
D
Q
\
R
Q
H
R
X
W
V
L
G
H
R
I
\
R
X
U
R
U
J
D
Q
L
]
D
W
L
R
Q
Q
RULVLWWR
E
H
U
H
S
U
R
G
X
F
H
G
F
R
S
L
H
G
R
U
H
[
K
L
E
L
W
H
G
L
Q
D
Q
\
I
D
V
K
L
R
Q
KRZQWRD
Q
\
R
Q
H
R
X
W
V
L
G
H
R
I
\
R
X
U
R
U
HSURGXFH
G
F
R
S
L
H
G
R
U
H
[
K
L
E
L
W
H
G
GGGGGGGG GGGGG XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXGXXFHG
U
HG KLELWHG
3//$48( &,5$48( &,5&/(&/(
5(' :+,7(%25'(55(' :+,7(%25'(
))$&( /$&)
VKVK ZQZQ
7KHFKDQ
J
L
Q
J
R
I
F
R
O
R
U
V
V
L
]
H
V
P
D
W
H
U
L
D
O
V
R
U
L
O
O
X
P
L
Q
D
W
L
R
Q
P
H
W
K
R
G
GRHVQR
W
D
O
W
H
U
W
K
H
G
H
V
L
J
Q
2
Z
Q
H
U
V
K
L
S
R
I
W
K
L
V
G
H
V
L
J
Q
L
V
QJ
R
I
F
R
O
R
U
V
V
L
]
H
V
P
D
W
H
U
L
D
O
V
R
U
L
O
O
X
DOWHUWKH
G
H
V
L
J
Q
2
Z
Q
H
U
V
K
L
S
R
I
W
K
GGGGGGG HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHGHWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWKKKKKKKKKKKKKKWKKHG
RPH
2ZQ
'(5(5
$&(/,7/('6,//$&(/,7/('6,//$80,1$80,
/(7(7/(77(567(567
LQLQ RIFRIF
KHOGE\6
X
S
H
U
L
R
U
(
O
H
F
W
U
L
F
D
O
6XSHULRU
(
O
H
F
W
U
L
F
D
O
HOGHOG
U(O
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
,
Q
F
$GYH
$XWKRUL]D
W
L
R
Q
W
R
X
V
H
W
K
L
V
G
H
V
L
J
Q
L
Q
D
Q
\
I
D
V
K
L
R
Q
WRXVHW
K
L
V
G
H
V
L
J
Q
L
Q
D
Q
\
I
D
V
K
L
R
Q
VVVV GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGVGHHHHHHHHHHHWWWWWWWWWWHWWKLV
XW
DQ\IDV
PXVWEHR
E
W
D
L
Q
H
G
L
Q
Z
U
L
W
L
Q
J
I
U
R
P
6
X
S
H
U
L
R
U
(
O
H
F
W
U
L
F
D
O
PXVWEHR
E
W
D
L
Q
H
G
ULFDO
XP
WEHREW
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
,
Q
F
HHHHHHHHH UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU WWWWWWWWHUW$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$G$G$GYH UWLVLQJ
:HVW$QDKHLP6WUHHW
/RQJ%HDFK&DOLIRUQLD
3KRQH
)DFVLPLOH
ZZZVXSHULRUVLJQVFRP
3URMHFW
$FFRXQW0DQDJHU
'HVLJQHU
6FDOH
'HVLJQ1R
'DWH
3DJH
5HJ1R
5HYLVLRQV
7KLVLVDQRULJLQDOXQSXEOLVKHGGUDZLQJFUHDWHG
E\6XSHULRU(OHFWULFDO$GYHUWLVLQJ,QF,WLV
VXEPLWWHGIRU\RXUDSSURYDO,WLVQRWWREHVKRZQ
WRDQ\RQHRXWVLGHRI\RXURUJDQL]DWLRQQRULVLW
WREHUHSURGXFHGFRSLHGRUH[KLELWHGLQDQ\
IDVKLRQ7KHFKDQJLQJRIFRORUVVL]HVPDWHULDOV
RULOOXPLQDWLRQPHWKRGGRHVQRWDOWHUWKHGHVLJQ
2ZQHUVKLSRIWKLVGHVLJQLVKHOGE\6XSHULRU
(OHFWULFDO$GYHUWLVLQJ,QF$XWKRUL]DWLRQWRXVH
WKLVGHVLJQLQDQ\IDVKLRQPXVWEHREWDLQHGLQ
ZULWLQJIURP6XSHULRU(OHFWULFDO$GYHUWLVLQJ,QF
1RWH 7KH&RORUVGHSLFWHGKHUHDUHDJUDSKLF
UHSUHVHQWDWLRQ$FWXDOFRORUVPD\YDU\
6HHFRORUVSHFLILFDWLRQV
6($F
2I
$GGUHVV
)25-2%&+(&. '$7(
$FFW0JU
$FFW0JU
$FFW0JU
'HVLJQ
3URGXFWLRQ
$33529$/6
)25&216758&7,21 '$7(
)25,167$//21/< '$7(
$6127('
&<17+,$/,0$
$1$+(,0(;35(66
&$5:$6+
6%HDFK%OYG :%DOO5G
$QDKHLP&D
5 SO UHY³&DU:DVK´
OD\RXWRQDOOVLJQV
5 SO UHYSHU&/
5 SO UHORFDWHVLJQ(
5 SO DGGH[LVWVLJQOD\RXW
RQ6LJQ%
3O
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$1111111$$$((((,,,,,,00001111111111$$$$$$$$$$((((((((,,,,,,,0000000
((((;;;;;;;;33333333355 666666666((((((((((;;;;;;;;;;3333333333555555555(((((((((6666666666666666666666666
$1$+(,0
(;35(66
$$$$$$$$$$5555555555 $$$$$$$$$66666666+++++++++$$$$$$$$$$6666666666++++++++++&$5:$6+
·
µ
·
µ
·
µ
·
µ
·
õ
µ
·
µ
·µ
·µ
·
µ
5(752),7(;,67,1*'28%/(6,'(')5((67$1',1*6,*1
6&$/( µ ·µ
µ
´$
µ
µ
´:
µ
%
µ
&+$11(/
öµ
ô
µ
(;326('1(212167$5%25'(5
$/80,1805$,6('%25'(5:,7+
:+,7((;326('1(21,1)5217
&$%,1(7
&$%,1(7
&+$11(/3/$48( &,5&/( 3$,17('
5(' :+,7(%25'(5
(;326('%8/%6/(',//80,1$7('
3$,17('$/80,180'(&25$7('$&&(17
3$,17(':+,7(67((/5281'3,3(
6833257
)$&(/,7/('6,//80,1$7('&+$11(/
%25'(5 /(77(56
)$&(/,7/('6,//80,1$7('&+$11(/
/(77(56
)$&(/,7/('6,//80,1$7('&+$11(/
/(77(56
3$,17(':+,7(67((/5281'3,3(
6833257
·
µ
·
µ
·
µ
·µ
(;,67,1*'28%/(6,'(')5((67$1',1*6,*1
6&$/( µ ·µ
·
µ
666666666++++++666666666+++++++++6+++++++++++,1(7
/,7/('6
325257777
&$%
$&(
+++++++++++++++++
7(6
·
µ
·
·
´$´
´:
µ
$$$$$$$$$$$++++++++(((
555555555(((((((6666666
$+($$$$$$$$$+++++++++((((((($+(
5(555555555(((((((((666665(6
000000000
66666666666666
00000000000
6666666666666666
öµ
(;32
$/
:+
&
)
µ
7KLVLVDQ
R
U
L
J
L
Q
D
O
X
Q
S
X
E
O
L
V
K
H
G
G
U
D
Z
L
Q
J
F
U
H
D
W
H
G
E
\
6
X
S
H
U
L
R
U
(
O
H
FWULFDO
HG
E
\
6
X
S
H
U
L
R
U
(
O
H
F
W
U
L
F
D
O
F·
µ
·
(
DWHG
DQ LJLQDO
X
LJLQDO
X
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
,
Q
F
,
W
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
,
Q
F
,
W
L
V
FFFFFFF FJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ J,QF
VXEPLVVXEPPLWWHGIRU
\
R
X
U
D
EPLWWHG
\RXU
D
S
S
U
R
Y
D
O
\
WLV EPL
&+$11(/3/&+$11(/3/$48$
5(' 5
,WLVQRW
W
R
E
H
V
K
R
Z
Q
W
R
D
Q
\
R
Q
H
R
X
W
V
L
G
H
R
I
\
R
X
U
R
U
J
D
Q
L
]
D
W
L
R
Q
Q
RULVLWWR
E
H
U
H
S
U
R
G
X
F
H
G
F
R
S
RQQRULV
L
W
W
R
E
H
U
H
S
U
R
G
X
F
H
G
F
R
S
L
H
G
GGGGGGGG GGGGG XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXGXXFHG
U
RUH[KLEL
W
H
G
L
Q
D
Q
\
HGRUH[K
\
I
D
V
K
L
R
Q
HG KLELWHG
\RXURUJD
3//$48( &,5$48( &,5&/(&/(
5(' :+,7(%25'(55(' :+,7(%25'(
))$&( /$&)
WWR
7KHFKDQ
J
L
Q
J
R
I
F
R
O
R
U
V
V
L
]
H
V
P
D
W
H
U
L
D
O
V
R
U
L
O
O
X
P
L
Q
D
W
L
R
Q
P
H
W
K
R
G
GRHVQR
W
D
O
W
H
U
W
K
H
G
H
V
L
J
Q
2
Z
Q
PHWKRGG
R
H
V
Q
R
W
D
O
W
H
U
W
K
H
G
H
V
L
J
Q
2
Z
GGGGGGG HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHGHWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWKKKKKKKKKKKKKKWKKHG
RPHRQ
P
H
W
K
R
G
G
R
H
V
Q
R
W
D
O
W
H
U
W
K
H
G
H
V
L
J
Q
2
Z
Q
H
U
V
K
L
S
R
I
W
K
L
V
G
H
V
L
J
Q
L
V
2ZQHUV2ZQ
OVRULOOX
P
L
Q
D
W
L
R
Q
'(5(5
$&(/,7/('6,//$&(/,7/('6,//80,1$80,
/(7/(77(567(56
FK KHOGE\6
X
S
H
U
L
R
U
(
O
H
F
W
U
L
F
D
O
DOHUWLVLQJ
,
Q
F
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
$XWKRUL]D
W
L
R
Q
W
R
X
V
H
W
K
L
V
G
H
V
L
J
Q
L
Q
D
Q
\
I
D
$XWKRUL]D
W
L
R
Q
W
R
X
V
H
W
K
L
V
G
H
V
L
J
Q
L
Q
VVVV GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGVGHHHHHHHHHHHWWWWWWWWWWHWWKLV
XW
DQ\
I
D
V
K
L
R
Q
DQ\IDV
PXVWEHR
E
W
D
L
Q
H
G
L
Q
Z
U
L
W
L
Q
J
I
U
R
P
6
X
S
H
U
L
R
U
(
O
H
F
W
U
L
F
D
O
P6XSHULR
U
(
O
H
F
W
U
XP
LQHGLQZ
U
L
W
L
Q
$GYHUWLVL
Q
J
WLVLQJHHHHHHHHHUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUWWWWWWWWHUW$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$G$G$GYH WLVLQJ,Q
F
WLVLQJ,Q
F
WWWWWWWWWUWLVLQJ
PROJECT SUMMARY
Development Standard C-G
Standards
Proposed Project
Site Area None 1.06 acres
Building Height 50 feet 37’6”
Landscape Setbacks:
Abutting arterial highway
15 feet, as measured from the
ultimate highway right-of-way
line as designated on the
Circulation Element of the
General Plan
• 15-foot setback abutting
Ball Road
• 15-foot setback abutting
Beach Boulevard
Structural Setbacks:
Abutting arterial highway
Same as Landscape Setback
119-foot setback along
Ball Road
Landscape Setbacks:
Abutting local street Same as Landscape Setback -foot setback along
Beach Boulevard
Structural Setbacks:
Abutting Any Non-Residential Interior
Site Boundary Lines
None West Interior Boundary: 66 feet
South Interior Boundary: 55.19 feet
Parking 34 26
ATTACHMENT NO. 10
S
I
T
E
P
H
O
T
O
S
A
-
0
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
E
X
P
R
E
S
S
W
A
S
H
9
2
6
S
B
e
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
4
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
B
y
:
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
W
a
s
h
L
L
C
V
i
e
w
F
r
o
m
B
a
l
l
R
o
a
d
A
e
r
i
a
l
V
i
e
w
F
r
o
m
S
o
u
t
h
A
e
r
i
a
l
V
i
e
w
F
r
o
m
N
o
r
t
h
A
e
r
i
a
l
V
i
e
w
View From Beach Blvd.View From Beach Blvd.
V
i
e
w
o
f
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
View From Ball Road
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
1
1
CITY OF ANAHEIM
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
CLASS 32 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS**
CASE NO.: DEV2016-00010
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05857
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05071
PROJECT APPLICANT: Robert M. McElroy
Anaheim Express Wash LLC
1840 Park Newport, Unit 308
Newport Beach, CA 92660
robertmmcelroy@gmail.com
PROJECT ADDRESS: 924 – 926 South Beach Boulevard and 2961 West Ball Road
APN(s): 126-261-04
PROJECT LOCATION:
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTING: This 1.06-acre property is developed with a 2,200
square-foot retail building, an 800 square-foot four-car garage, and a 12,256 square-foot motel with 28
units and is located in the “C-G” General Commercial. The General Plan designates the property for
ATTACHMENT NO. 12
Neighborhood Commercial land uses. Surrounding land uses include motels to the north and commercial
centers to the west, south, and east.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project entails the demolition of the existing motel, garage and retail
building and the construction of a new 4,992 square-foot self-service express automotive washing facility.
A combination of mid-century modern and contemporary architectural design is proposed for the new
building, which includes slanted rooflines, glass elements and a combination of plaster and aluminum
façades. Three interior queuing aisles will provide space for up to 21 vehicles with a separate pay station
for each aisle. A total of 26 self-serve vacuum stations are also proposed. The proposed canopy structure
would accommodate the vacuum equipment, provide shade and be constructed of a metal structure with a
fabric canopy.
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Center
ZONING: “C-G” General Commercial
INFORMATION DEMONSTRATING THAT THE PROJECT SATISFIES THE CONDITIONS
DESCRIBED IN SECTION 15332 OF TITLE 14 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS:
1. Is the project consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general
plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations?
The proposed automotive washing facility is consistent with the goals and objectives of the
General Plan by significantly improving the overall appearance of the property and address a
number of community concerns that have been raised by residents in the adjacent residential
neighborhoods regarding property maintenance, trash, loitering and security issues that spill into
the surrounding neighborhood. Staff anticipates that the proposed project will have a positive
impact on the quality of life in the adjacent neighborhood.
2. Is the proposed development located within the City limits on a project site of no more than five
acres substantially surrounded by urban uses?
The 1.06-acre property is located in the City of Anaheim and is currently developed with a motel
and a commercial retail building. Surrounding land uses include motels to the north and
commercial centers to the west, south, and east.
3. Does the project site have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species?
The project site is currently developed with commercial uses and has no habitat value for
endangered, rare or threatened species.
4. Would approval of the project result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air
quality, or water quality?
a. Traffic:
Construction - There would be a temporary minor increase in traffic due to construction vehicles
during the construction phase. However, this impact would be temporary. No significant impacts
would occur.
Operation - The proposed project consists of the establishment of a new automotive washing
facility on an existing commercial site. The City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines state that a
traffic study is required when a project is expected to generate 100 or more new vehicle trips in
the morning or evening peak hour. Based on a letter of operation prepared by the applicants, the
new automotive washing facility is estimated to generate a maximum of 90 new peak hour trips.
As such, a traffic study was not required. Neither roadway segments nor immediately
surrounding intersections are anticipated to be significantly impacted as a result of the additional
trips from the Proposed Project.
b. Noise:
Construction - The Project is anticipated to generate temporary noise during construction
activities. Equipment used during construction could create noise impacts through the duration of
the construction process. However, these impacts are temporary and would cease upon
completion of construction. Chapter 6.70 of the City’s noise ordinance exempts construction
noise between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Adherence to the
City Noise Ordinance would result in no significant impacts.
Operation - The Project is an automotive washing facility that has the potential to generate noise
impacts that exceed the City’s Noise Ordinance thresholds, resulting from the use of the tunnel
vacuum and drying equipment. The applicant has submitted a noise and vibration study that
determined the tunnel vacuum and drying equipment will meet the City’s noise ordinance with
construction of a noise barrier consisting of an eight-foot high concrete block wall with seven feet
of transparent plexiglass material along the northwesterly property line. As such, no significant
impacts would occur.
c. Air Quality:
The Project site is located within SoCAB which is characterized by relatively poor air quality and
is a Federal- and State-designated nonattainment area for O3, PM10 and PM2.5 (US EPA 2012).
SCAQMD has established significance thresholds for both construction and operational activities
relative to these criteria pollutants. Based on the following analysis, implementation of the
Project would result in less than significant impacts relative to the daily significance thresholds
for criteria air pollutant construction emissions established by the SCAQMD.
Construction – The construction will consist of a new 4,992 square-foot self-service express
automotive washing facility with a total of 26 self-serve vacuum stations. General construction
activities, can contribute to air pollutants. All construction activities would comply with
SCAQMD Rule 403 (SCAQMD 2005) regarding the control of fugitive dust emissions, and
existing City dust suppression practices that minimize dust and other emissions. Such controls
include frequent watering of the site, the covering and/or wetting of trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil
or other loose materials off-site, street sweeping, as needed, to remove dirt dropped by
construction vehicles or mud that would otherwise be carried off by trucks departing the site,
suspending grading and excavation activities in high winds (25 miles per hour [mph] or more) as
well as implementation of a traffic control plan to minimize traffic flow interference from
construction activities, etc., that would be incorporated into the construction plans.
Construction is anticipated to last four months and completed in three phases: demolition,
grading, and building construction (which consists of building construction, paving, and
architectural coating).
Pollutant emissions resulting from Project construction activities were calculated using the
CalEEMod model. Construction emissions are based on conservative assumptions, which imply
a default equipment mix and a worst-case construction schedule. As shown in Table 1, entitled
“Project-Related Construction and Operational Emissions,” the incremental increase in emissions
from Project construction activities fall well below SCAQMD significance thresholds for regional
emissions.
Operation - The Project’s incremental increase in regional emissions resulting from operation of
the Project would not exceed any SCAQMD thresholds. Mobile source emission calculations
utilize the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rate calculated by CalEEMod, based on the specific
proposed land use and intensity. The daily VMT rate is based on the number of daily trips for
each land use and applied to a commute percentage and an average trip length, both of which are
land use specific values derived from CalEEMod. These values account for variations in trip
frequency and length associated with commuting to and from the Project. Emission factors
specific to the buildout year are projected based on SoCAB-specific fleet turnover rates and the
impact of future emission standards and fuel efficiency standards. The increase in the
consumption of fossil fuels to provide power, heat, and ventilation was considered in the
calculations as stationary point source emissions. Future fuel consumption rates are estimated
based on land use specific energy consumption rates. The emission factors used in this analysis
represent a State-wide average of known power producing facilities, utilizing various
technologies and emission control strategies, and do not take into account any unique emissions
profile. At this time, these emission factors are considered conservative and representative. Area
source emissions were calculated by CalEEMod and include emissions from natural gas and
landscape fuel combustion, consumer products, and architectural coatings (future maintenance).
As shown in Table 1, the operational emissions pollutant concentrations resulting from Project
operation would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, air quality impacts would be less
than significant.
Table 1 Project-Related Construction and Operational Emissions
Mass Daily Thresholds (pounds per day)
VOC NO x CO SO 2 PM10 PM 2.5
Construction Emissions
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
2016 Project Emissions 2 4.15 2.9 43.8 0.36 0.27
Exceed Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Operational Emissions
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Project Emissions 1.24 1.24 6.04 12.38 0.88 0.25
Exceed Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source of emissions: CalEEMod 2013.2.2
Source of thresholds: SCAQMD
Regional emissions refer to the ambient conditions surrounding the site. Therefore, pollutant
emissions associated with construction of the Project would be less than significant.
Operational related impacts are typically associated with emissions produced from Project-
generated vehicle trips. Based on the Project’s anticipated compliance with SCAQMD Rule
403 and the scale of development, it is anticipated that no significant impacts would occur to
existing air quality standards.
d. Water Quality:
Grading and construction associated with site work on the project site would result in temporary
disturbance of surface soils, which could potentially result in erosion and sedimentation on site,
which are major visible water quality impacts attributable to construction activities. Any
stockpiles of excavated areas would be susceptible to high rates of erosion from wind and rain
and, if not manage properly, could result in increased sedimentation in local drainage ways.
The Project must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) MS4 Permit. The NPDES MS4 Permit Program, which is administered in the
project area by the City of Anaheim and County of Orange, issued by the Santa Ana Regional
Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), helps control water pollution by regulating point
sources that discharge pollutants into receiving waters. Project operation must also comply with
the NPDES General Construction Permit.
The contractor would be required to comply with Chapter 10.09 of the Anaheim Municipal Code,
which prohibits the active or passive discharge or disposal of soil or construction debris into the
storm drain. Additionally, the Project would be required to obtain coverage under the General
Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction
General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ). Construction activities subject to the Construction
General Permit includes clearing, grading, and disturbances to ground such as stockpiling or
excavation. The Construction General Permit requires implementation of a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would generally contain a site map showing
the construction perimeter, existing and proposed buildings, storm water collection and discharge
points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the site, and
adjacent roadways.
The SWPPP must also include project construction features designed to protect against
stormwater runoff, known as Best Management Practices (BMPs). Additionally, the SWPPP
must contain a visual monitoring program; a chemical monitoring program for “non-visible”
pollutants, should the BMPs fail; and a sediment monitoring plan, should the site discharge
directly into a water body listed on the 303(d) list for sediment. Section A of the Construction
General Permit describes the elements that must be contained in the SWPPP. Incorporation of
these policies and ordinances and the requirements contained within would reduce project
impacts to less than significant.
5. Can the project site be adequately served by all required utilities and public services?
a. Fire Protection, b. Police Protection:
The construction of the automotive washing facility would not generate additional demand on
police or fire services. Building plans submitted for new development on the project site would be
required to comply with fire safety requirements. Additionally, development of the project site
would not result in the need for new or physically altered police or fire protection facilities.
Impacts to police and fire services would be less than significant.
c. Schools, d. Parks, e. Other Public Facilities:
The Proposed Project would include the construction of a new automotive washing facility. The
commercial use will not have an impact on school services, park services or other public
facilities, including the Anaheim Public Library system.
f. Wastewater/Sewer:
The Project would be served by the Anaheim Public Works Department for wastewater (Sanitary
Sewer) collection service. The Project is located within a developed area and there is an existing
Public wastewater (Sanitary Sewer) main adjacent to the Project site. The project would be
required to connect to this existing wastewater (Sanitary Sewer) line. The existing wastewater
facilities are not identified as deficient in the “Existing” condition in the latest Combined Central
Anaheim Area Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers. Due to the small size of the project, there is no
reasonable possibility that this project will result in that deficiency being triggered, and no
significant impacts on existing wastewater infrastructure would occur. Existing facilities would
be adequate to serve the wastewater collection requirements of the Project. Impacts to wastewater
treatment facilities (OCSD) would be less than significant.
g. Storm Water Drainage:
On-site grading and drainage improvements proposed in conjunction with the proposed site work
would be required to meet the City’s and Orange County Flood Control District’s flood control
criteria including design discharges, design/construction standards and maintenance features. All
new development projects in the City are also required to include specific design Best
Management Practices to ensure that no stormwater runoff generated on site would be allowed to
leave the site without pre-treatment for urban pollutants. The Project would not alter any drainage
pattern in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite. The Project
would not involve an alteration of the course of a stream or river. Erosion and siltation impacts
potentially resulting from the project would, for the most part, occur during the Project’s site
preparation phase. Implementation of the NPDES permit requirements, as they apply to the site,
would reduce potential erosion, siltation, and water quality impacts. Less than significant impacts
would occur.
h. Water Supplies:
The City of Anaheim receives water from two main sources: the Orange County Groundwater
Basin, which is managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD), and imported water
from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). Groundwater is pumped
from 18 active wells located within the City, and imported water is delivered to the City through
seven treated water connections and one untreated connection.
According to the City of Anaheim 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), local
groundwater has been the least expensive and most reliable source of water supply for the City.
The City depends heavily on the groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin each
year. The Project includes the construction of a new automotive washing facility in an existing
commercial property. Due to the similar size of the project, the supply of local water needed to
support the use is not substantial. Therefore, the production rates of local wells would not be
significantly impacted. The Project would also result in similar amounts of impervious surfaces
than what currently exist on the site. Therefore, the development would not result in a significant
deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table. Less than significant
impacts to groundwater supplies would occur.
i. Solid Waste Disposal:
Assembly Bill 939 requires local jurisdictions to divert at least 50 percent of their solid waste into
recycling. As of 2012, the City is diverting approximately 65 percent of its waste into recycling.
Waste from the City is currently being diverted to the Olinda Alpha Landfill in the City of Brea
and the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in the City of Irvine. Combined, the two landfills accept
approximately 23,500 tons of waste per day, or over seven million tons annually. The project’s
contribution of solid waste would be minimal and would not significantly impact landfill
operations. No significant impacts would occur.
j. Electricity: k. Natural Gas: l. Telephone Service: m. Television Service:
The Project site is located in a built-out, urban setting. The site and the surrounding commercial
properties are fully served by various utility service providers. There are no anticipated
significant service or system upgrades needed to serve the proposed commercial use. Any
increase in demand for these services would be considered to be less than significant.
** Authority: See Public Resources Code Section 21083 and Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations.
DETERMINATION:
I find that the answers given above are adequately supported by the information sources cited following
each question and that the effects of the Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects
(i.e., Class 32 – Infill Development Projects) characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions
of Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The Project will not cause a
significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement for the
preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act.
7/1/16
Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Date
Gustavo N. Gonzalez, AICP, Senior Planner (714) 765-4671
Printed Name, Title Phone Number
April 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
ATTACHMENT NO. 13
April 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
Submitted to:
Anaheim Express Wash, LLC
924-926 Beach Boulevard
Anaheim, California 92610
Prepared by:
LSA Associates, Inc.
20 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92614
(949) 553-0666
Project No. AEW1601
________________________________________________
Tung-chen Chung, PhD INCE Board Certified
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 1
METHODOLOGY RELATED TO THE NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ....................................... 1
CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUND ....................................................................................................... 4
MEASUREMENT OF SOUND ............................................................................................................. 4
PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NOISE ............................................................................................ 5
SETTING ............................................................................................................................................... 6
PROJECT IMPACTS ........................................................................................................................... 12
MITIGATION MEASURES ................................................................................................................ 21
LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION ........................................................................ 21
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................... 22
FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Location Map .............................................................................................................. 2
Figure 2: Site Plan .................................................................................................................................. 3
TABLES
Table A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms ............................................................................................. 7
Table B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources ................................................................... 7
Table C: Land Use Compatibility for Exterior Community Noise ......................................................... 8
Table D: Human Response to Different Levels of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration ........................ 9
Table E: Ground-Borne Vibration and Noise Impact Criteria.............................................................. 11
Table F: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria ............................................................................... 12
Table G: Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria ................................................... 12
Table H: RCNM Default Noise Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors ................................. 13
Table I: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction Equipment .................................................... 16
Table J: Summary of Construction Equipment and Activity Vibration ............................................... 17
Table K: Decibel Readings on Air One Profiler Dryers (dBA) ............................................................ 18
Table L: Decibel Readings on Proto-Vest Dryers with Silencer Package (dBA) ................................ 18
Table M: Decibel Readings on Ryko Car Washes (dBA) .................................................................... 19
APPENDIX
A: MOTOR CITY WASH WORKS DRYER NOISE DECIBEL LEVEL READINGS
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» ii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
μin/sec micro-inches per second
μPa micro-Pascals
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
City City of Anaheim
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
dB Decibels
dBA A-weighted decibels
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
ft foot/feet
FTA Federal Transit Administration
HP Horsepower
HVAC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
Hz Hertz
in/sec
L50
L90
inches per second
median noise level
noise level exceeded 90 percent of the time
Ldn day-night average noise level
Leq equivalent continuous sound level
Lmax maximum instantaneous noise level
LSA LSA Associates, Inc.
LV velocity in decibels
PPV
project
peak particle velocity
proposed car wash facility
RCNM Roadway Construction Noise Model
RMS root-mean-square (velocity)
STC Sound Transmission Class
VdB vibration velocity decibels
VMS variable message sign
Vref reference velocity amplitude
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 1
INTRODUCTION
This noise impact analysis has been prepared to evaluate the potential noise impacts and mitigation
measures associated with the proposed car wash facility (project) on the north side of West Ball Road
and on the east side of Beach Boulevard in the City of Anaheim (City), County of Orange, California.
This report is intended to satisfy the City’s requirement for a project-specific noise impact analysis by
examining the short-term and long-term impacts on adjacent uses and by evaluating the effectiveness
of mitigation measures incorporated as part of the project designs.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is located north of West Ball Road and east of Beach Boulevard. The project
proposes a car wash facility that includes a car wash (wet) tunnel and a covered canopy for pay
stations.
Once the specified wash is selected and paid for, the automobile will be taken into the wash tunnel.
The cycle includes a complete wash of the outside portions of the automobile. The automobile will
then be taken on the same platform to the second cycle in the wash tunnel, where the car will go
through a series of dryers. While their automobile is in the tunnel, the customer will be able to go
through the car wash lobby and watch their car go through the drying process. The lobby also will
offer restrooms and vending machines containing snacks and soft drinks. Once the drying process is
complete, the customer will exit the lobby to retrieve their automobile and drive away. The tunnel
includes a station to vacuum the interior of the automobile, a station to detail the interior, and a
station for window cleaning. These stations are set up “assembly style” where each station will have a
minimum of two car wash staff members providing each individual service. As the car wash gets
busier, more staff members will be added to each station.
The car wash proposes to be open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. 7 days a week for the full-service car wash
and 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for the automatic wash service. A security guard will be provided
on site 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
The project site is surrounded by commercial uses. No residential uses are located to the south across
West Ball Road. One motel (Travel Inn) is located to the north/northwest of the project site,
approximately 70 feet (ft) from the nearest dryers inside the proposed wash tunnel. Figure 1 shows
the project location. Figure 2 shows the project site plan.
METHODOLOGY RELATED TO THE NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The evaluation of noise impacts associated with the proposed project includes the following:
Determine the short-term construction noise impacts on off-site noise-sensitive land uses
Determine the short-term construction vibration impacts on off-site noise-sensitive uses
Determine the long-term stationary source noise impacts on off-site noise-sensitive uses
Determine the required mitigation measures to reduce short-term and long-term noise and
vibration impacts, if necessary
SOURCE Bing Maps:
FEET
200010000
N
FIGURE1
Project Location
I:\AEW1601\G\Location.cdr (4/12/2016)
Anaheim Express Wash
PROJECT
LOCATION
B
E
A
C
H
B
L
V
D
.
B
E
A
C
H
B
L
V
D
.
FE
E
T
50
25
0N
FIGURE2 Site Plan
I:
\
A
E
W
1
6
0
1
\
G
\
S
i
t
e
P
l
a
n
.
c
d
r
(
4
/
1
2
/
2
0
1
6
)
Anaheim
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
W
a
s
h
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 4
This noise impact analysis utilizes the City’s noise standards, including the City’s Noise Element,
Municipal Code, and Zoning Ordinance, as thresholds against which potential noise impacts are
evaluated.
CHARACTERISTICS OF SOUND
Sound is increasing in the environment and can affect quality of life. Noise is usually defined as
unwanted sound. Noise consists of any sound that may produce physiological or psychological
damage and/or interfere with communication, work, rest, recreation, and sleep. To the human ear,
sound has two significant characteristics: pitch and loudness. Pitch is generally an annoyance, while
loudness can affect the ability to hear. Pitch is the number of complete vibrations, or cycles per
second, of a wave, resulting in the tone’s range from high to low. Loudness is the strength of a sound
and describes a noisy or quiet environment; it is measured by the amplitude of the sound wave.
Loudness is determined by the intensity of the sound waves, combined with the reception
characteristics of the human ear. Sound intensity refers to how hard the sound wave strikes an object,
which in turn produces the sound’s effect. This characteristic of sound can be precisely measured
with instruments. The analysis of a project defines the noise environment of the project area in terms
of sound intensity and its effect on adjacent sensitive land uses.
MEASUREMENT OF SOUND
Sound intensity is measured through the A-weighted (dBA) scale to correct for the relative frequency
response of the human ear. That is, an A-weighted noise level de-emphasizes low and very high
frequencies of sound similar to the human ear’s de-emphasis of these frequencies. Unlike linear units,
such as inches or pounds, decibels (dB) are measured on a logarithmic scale representing points on a
sharply rising curve.
For example, 10 dB are 10 times more intense than 1 dB, 20 dB are 100 times more intense, and
30 dB are 1,000 times more intense. Thirty decibels represent 1,000 times more acoustic energy than
1 dB. The decibel scale increases as the square of the change, representing the sound pressure energy.
A sound as soft as human breathing is about 10 times greater than 0 dB. The decibel system of
measuring sound gives a rough connection between the physical intensity of sound and its perceived
loudness to the human ear. A 10-dB increase in sound level is perceived by the human ear as only a
doubling of the loudness of the sound. Ambient sounds generally range from 30 dBA (very quiet) to
100 dBA (very loud).
Sound levels are generated from a source, and their decibel level decreases as the distance from that
source increases. Sound dissipates exponentially with distance from the noise source. For a single
point source, sound levels decrease approximately 6 dB for each doubling of distance from the
source. This drop-off rate is appropriate for noise generated by stationary equipment. If noise is
produced by a line source, such as highway traffic or railroad operations, the sound decreases 3 dB
for each doubling of distance in a hard site environment. Line source noise, when produced within a
relatively flat environment with absorptive vegetation, decreases 4.5 dB for each doubling of
distance.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 5
There are many ways to rate noise for various time periods, but an appropriate rating of ambient noise
affecting humans also accounts for the annoyance effects of sound. Equivalent continuous sound level
(Leq) is the total sound energy of time-varying noise over a sample period. However, the predominant
rating scales for human communities in the State of California are the Leq and community noise
equivalent level (CNEL) or the day-night average level (Ldn) based on dBA. CNEL is the time-
varying noise over a 24-hour period, with a 5 dBA weighting factor applied to the hourly Leq for
noises occurring from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. (defined as relaxation hours) and 10 dBA weighting
factor applied to noise occurring from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (defined as sleeping hours). Ldn is
similar to the CNEL scale but without the adjustment for events occurring during the evening hours.
CNEL and Ldn are within 1 dBA of each other and are normally exchangeable. The noise adjustments
are added to the noise events occurring during the more sensitive hours.
Other noise rating scales of importance when assessing the annoyance factor include the maximum
noise level (Lmax), which is the highest exponential time-averaged sound level that occurs during a
stated time period. The noise environments discussed in this analysis are specified in terms of
maximum levels denoted by Lmax for short-term noise impacts. Lmax reflects peak operating conditions
and addresses the annoyance aspects of intermittent noise.
Another noise scale often used together with the Lmax in noise ordinances for enforcement purposes is
noise standards in terms of percentile noise levels. For example, the L10 noise level represents the
noise level exceeded 10 percent of the time during a stated period. The L50 noise level represents the
median noise level. Half the time the noise level exceeds this level, and half the time it is less than
this level. The L90 noise level represents the noise level exceeded 90 percent of the time and is
considered the background noise level during a monitoring period. For a relatively constant noise
source, the Leq and L50 are approximately the same.
Noise impacts can be described in three categories. The first is audible impacts, referring to increases
in noise levels noticeable to humans. Audible increases in noise levels generally refer to a change of
3 dB or greater, since this level has been found to be barely perceptible in exterior environments. The
second category, potentially audible, refers to a change in the noise level between 1 and 3 dB. This
range of noise levels has been found to be noticeable only in laboratory environments. The last
category is changes in noise level of less than 1 dB, which are inaudible to the human ear. Only
audible changes in existing ambient or background noise levels are considered potentially significant.
PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NOISE
Physical damage to human hearing begins at prolonged exposure to noise levels higher than 85 dBA.
Exposure to high noise levels affects the entire system, with prolonged noise exposure in excess of
75 dBA increasing body tensions and thereby affecting blood pressure and functions of the heart and
the nervous system. In comparison, extended periods of noise exposure above 90 dBA would result in
permanent cell damage. When the noise level reaches 120 dBA, a tickling sensation occurs in the
human ear even with short-term exposure. This level of noise is called the threshold of feeling. As the
sound reaches 140 dBA, the tickling sensation is replaced by the feeling of pain in the ear. This is
called the threshold of pain. A sound level of 160 to 165 dBA will result in dizziness and loss of
equilibrium.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 6
The ambient or background noise problem is widespread and generally more concentrated in urban
areas than in outlying, less developed areas.
Table A lists definitions of acoustical terms; Table B shows common sound levels and their noise
sources; and Table C shows land use compatibility for exterior community noise, as recommended by
the California Department of Health, Office of Noise Control.
SETTING
Existing Sensitive Land Uses in the Project Area
Sensitive receptors include residences, schools, hospitals, and similar uses that are sensitive to noise
(e.g., hotels and motels). One motel is located to the north/northwest of the project site, with the
nearest guest rooms approximately 70 ft from the dryers inside the proposed wash tunnel. These
nearest noise-sensitive guest rooms would be potentially affected by the noise generated during
construction and operation on site.
Overview of the Existing Noise Environment
The primary existing noise sources in the project area are transportation facilities. Traffic on West
Ball Road, Beach Boulevard, and other local streets is the dominant source contributing to the
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity.
Noise from motor vehicles is generated by engine vibrations, the interaction between the tires and the
road, and the exhaust system. Noise levels on and in the vicinity of the project site will change as a
result of the proposed project. Potential noise impacts associated with the project include temporary
construction noise and long-term operational noise (e.g., the dryers inside the proposed wash tunnel).
Vibration
Vibration refers to ground-borne noise and perceptible motion. Ground-borne vibration is almost
exclusively a concern inside buildings and is rarely perceived as a problem outdoors where the
motion may be discernible, but there is less adverse reaction without the effects associated with the
shaking of a building. Vibration energy propagates from a source through intervening soil and rock
layers to the foundations of nearby buildings. The vibration then propagates from the foundation
throughout the remainder of the structure. Building vibration may be perceived by occupants as the
motion of building surfaces, the rattling of items on shelves or hanging on walls, or a low-frequency
rumbling noise. The rumbling noise is caused by the vibration of walls, floors, and ceilings that
radiate sound waves. Annoyance from vibration often occurs when the vibration exceeds the
threshold of perception by 10 dB or less. This is an order of magnitude below the damage threshold
for normal buildings.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 7
Table A: Definitions of Acoustical Terms
Term Definition
Decibel, dB A unit of level that denotes the ratio between two quantities that are proportional to power; the
number of decibels is 10 times the logarithm (to the base 10) of this ratio.
Frequency, Hz Of a function periodic in time, the number of times that the quantity repeats itself in one second (i.e.,
number of cycles per second).
A-Weighted Sound Level,
dBA
The sound level obtained by use of A-weighting. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low
and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of
the human ear and correlates well with subjective reactions to noise.
All sound levels in this report are A-weighted, unless reported otherwise.
L02, L08, L50, L90 The fast A-weighted noise levels that are equaled or exceeded by a fluctuating sound level 2 percent,
8 percent, 50 percent, and 90 percent of a stated time period, respectively.
Equivalent Continuous
Noise Level, Leq
The level of a steady sound that, in a stated time period and at a stated location, has the same A-
weighted sound energy as the time-varying sound.
Community Noise
Equivalent Level, CNEL
The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight, obtained after the addition
of 5 decibels to sound levels occurring in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and after the
addition of 10 decibels to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
Day/Night Noise Level,
Ldn
The 24-hour A-weighted average sound level from midnight to midnight, obtained after the addition
of 10 decibels to sound levels occurring in the night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
Lmax, Lmin The maximum and minimum A-weighted sound levels measured on a sound level meter, during a
designated time interval, using fast time averaging.
Ambient Noise Level The all-encompassing noise associated with a given environment at a specified time, usually a
composite of sound from many sources at many directions, near and far; no particular sound is
dominant.
Intrusive The noise that intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative
intrusiveness of a sound depends upon its amplitude, duration, frequency, and time of occurrence
and tonal or informational content as well as the prevailing ambient noise level.
Source: Handbook of Acoustical Measurement and Noise Control (Harris 1991).
Table B: Common Sound Levels and Their Noise Sources
Noise Source
A-Weighted Sound
Level in Decibels Noise Environments Subjective Evaluations
Near jet engine 140 Deafening 128 times as loud
Civil defense siren 130 Threshold of pain 64 times as loud
Hard rock band 120 Threshold of feeling 32 times as loud
Accelerating motorcycle at a few feet away 110 Very loud 16 times as loud
Pile driver, noisy urban street, heavy city traffic 100 Very loud 8 times as loud
Ambulance siren, food blender 95 Very loud
Garbage disposal 90 Very loud 4 times as loud
Freight cars, living room music 85 Loud
Pneumatic drill, vacuum cleaner 80 Loud 2 times as loud
Busy restaurant 75 Moderately loud
Near freeway auto traffic 70 Moderately loud Reference level
Average office 60 Quiet ½ as loud
Suburban street 55 Quiet
Light traffic, soft radio music in apartment 50 Quiet ¼ as loud
Large transformer 45 Quiet
Average residence without stereo playing 40 Faint ⅛ as loud
Soft whisper 30 Faint
Rustling leaves 20 Very faint
Human breathing 10 Very faint Threshold of hearing
0 Very faint
Source: Compiled by LSA Associates, Inc., 2015.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 8
Table C: Land Use Compatibility for Exterior Community Noise
Land Use Category
Noise Range (Ldn or CNEL), dB
I II III IV
Passively used open spaces 50 50–55 55–70 70+
Auditoriums, concert halls, amphitheaters 45–50 50–65 65–70 70+
Residential–low-density single family, duplex, mobile homes 50–55 55–70 70–75 75+
Residential–multifamily 50–60 60–70 70–75 75+
Transient lodging–motels, hotels 50–60 60–70 70–80 80+
Schools, libraries, churches, hospitals, nursing homes 50–60 60–70 70–80 80+
Actively used open spaces–playgrounds, neighborhood parks 50–67 – 67–73 73+
Golf courses, riding stables, water recreation, cemeteries 50–70 – 70–80 80+
Office buildings, business, commercial, and professional 50–67 67–75 75+ –
Industrial, manufacturing, utilities, agriculture 50–70 70–75 75+ –
Source: California Department of Health, Office of Noise Control 1976.
Noise Range I – Normally Acceptable: Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings
involved are of normal conventional construction, without any special noise insulation requirements.
Noise Range II – Conditionally Acceptable: New construction or development should be undertaken only after a
detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made, and needed noise insulation features are included in the
design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning, will
normally suffice.
Noise Range III – Normally Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new
construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and
needed noise insulation features included in the design.
Noise Range IV –Clearly Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken.
CNEL = community noise equivalent level
dB = decibel
Ldn = day-night average level
Typical sources of ground-borne vibration include construction activities (e.g., blasting, pile driving,
and operating heavy-duty earthmoving equipment), steel-wheeled trains, and occasional traffic on
rough roads. Problems with both ground-borne vibration and noise from these sources are usually
localized to areas within approximately 100 ft from the vibration source, although there are examples
of ground-borne vibration causing interference out to distances greater than 200 ft (Federal Transit
Administration [FTA] 2006). When roadways are smooth, vibration from traffic, even heavy trucks,
is rarely perceptible. For most projects it is assumed that the roadway surface will be smooth enough
that ground-borne vibration from street traffic will not exceed the impact criteria.
Ground-borne noise is not likely to be a problem because noise arriving via the normal airborne path
will usually be greater than ground-borne noise.
Ground-borne vibration has the potential to disturb people and damage buildings. Although it is very
rare for train-induced ground-borne vibration to cause even cosmetic building damage, it is not
uncommon for construction processes (e.g., blasting and pile driving) to cause vibration of sufficient
amplitudes to damage nearby buildings (FTA 2006). Ground-borne vibration is usually measured in
terms of vibration velocity, either the root-mean-square (RMS) velocity or peak particle velocity
(PPV). The RMS is best for characterizing human response to building vibration, and PPV is used to
characterize potential for damage. Decibel notation acts to compress the range of numbers required to
describe vibration. Vibration velocity level in decibels is defined as
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 9
Lv = 20 log10 [V/Vref]
where Lv is the vibration velocity in decibels (VdB), “V” is the RMS velocity amplitude, and “Vref” is
the reference velocity amplitude, or 1 x 10-6 inches per second used in the United States. Table D
illustrates human response to various vibration levels, as described in the Transit Noise and Vibration
Impact Assessment (FTA 2006).
Table D: Human Response to Different Levels of Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration
Vibration
Velocity
Level
Noise Level
Human Response
Low-
Frequency1
Mid-
Frequency2
65 VdB 25 dBA 40 dBA Approximate threshold of perception for many humans. Low-frequency
sound usually inaudible; mid-frequency sound excessive for quiet sleeping
areas.
75 VdB 35 dBA 50 dBA Approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly
perceptible. Many people find transit vibration at this level unacceptable.
Low-frequency noise acceptable for sleeping areas; mid-frequency noise
annoying in most quiet occupied areas.
85 VdB 45 dBA 60 dBA Vibration acceptable only if there are an infrequent number of events per
day. Low-frequency noise unacceptable for sleeping areas; mid-frequency
noise unacceptable even for infrequent events with institutional land uses
(e.g., schools and churches).
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA 2006). 1 Approximate noise level when the vibration spectrum peak is near 30 Hz. 2 Approximate noise level when the vibration spectrum peak is near 60 Hz.
dBA = A-weighted decibels
FTA = Federal Transit Administration
Hz = Hertz
VdB = vibration velocity decibels
Factors that influence ground-borne vibration and noise include the following:
Vibration Source: Vehicle suspension, wheel types and condition, railroad track and roadway surface,
railroad track support system, speed, transit structure, and depth of vibration source
Vibration Path: Soil type, rock layers, soil layering, depth to water table, and frost depth
Vibration Receiver: Foundation type, building construction, and acoustical absorption
Among the factors listed above, there are significant differences in the vibration characteristics when
the source is underground compared to at the ground surface. In addition, soil conditions are known
to have a strong influence on the levels of ground-borne vibration. Among the most important factors
are the stiffness and internal damping of the soil and the depth to bedrock.
Experience with ground-borne vibration indicates (1) vibration propagation is more efficient in stiff,
clay soils than in loose, sandy soils; and (2) shallow rock seems to concentrate the vibration energy
close to the surface and can result in ground-borne vibration problems at large distances from a
railroad track. Factors (e.g., the layering of the soil and the depth to the water table) can have
significant effects on the propagation of ground-borne vibration. Soft, loose, sandy soils tend to
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 10
attenuate more vibration energy than hard, rocky materials. Vibration propagation through
groundwater is more efficient than through sandy soils.
Thresholds of Significance
Based on Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
Appendix G, Public Resource Code Sections 15000–15387, a project will normally have a significant
effect on the environment related to noise if it will substantially increase the ambient noise levels for
adjoining areas or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community in which it
is located. The applicable noise standards governing the project site are the noise criteria listed in the
City’s Municipal Code and Noise Element of the General Plan.
City of Anaheim Noise Element. The City has adopted a Noise Element in its General Plan (City of
Anaheim, May 2004), which incorporated the State Interior and Exterior Noise Standards in its Table
N-3. Single-family and multifamily residences are normally acceptable in exterior noise environments
up to 65 dBA CNEL. Interior noise levels within residential structures are acceptable up to 45 dBA
CNEL. Hotels and motels are normally acceptable when the interior noise environments are up to 45
dBA CNEL. No exterior noise standards are established for hotels and motels. For the purposes of
this noise impact analysis, hotels and motels with outdoor active use areas (e.g., balconies) exposed to
noise levels exceeding 65 dBA CNEL would need to be mitigated.
City of Anaheim Municipal Code Noise Ordinance. The City has incorporated the following
measures in the City’s Municipal Code to control loud, unnecessary, and unusual noises. The City has
the authority to set land use noise standards and place restrictions on private activities that generate
excessive or intrusive noise. The applicable standards for these activities are specified in the City
Municipal Code. The Municipal Code limits sound levels for stationary sources of noise radiated for
extended periods from any premises in excess of 60 dB at the property line. Sound created by
construction or building repair of any premises within the City is also exempt from the applications of
the Municipal Code during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Traffic sounds, sound created by
emergency activities, and sound created by governmental units are exempt from the applications of
the Municipal Cod
Vibration Impact Criteria
The criteria for environmental impact from ground-borne vibration and noise are based on the
maximum levels for a single event.
Federal Transit Administration. The vibration standards included in the FTA Transit Noise and
Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA, May 2006) are used in this analysis for ground-borne vibration
impacts on human annoyance, as shown in Table E. The criteria presented in Table E account for
variation in project types as well as the frequency of events, which differ widely among projects. It is
intuitive that when there will be fewer events per day, it should take higher vibration levels to evoke
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 11
Table E: Ground-Borne Vibration and Noise Impact Criteria
Land Use Category
Ground-Borne Vibration Impact
Levels (VdB re 1 µin/sec)
Ground-Borne Noise Impact
Levels (dB re 20 µPa)
Frequent1
Events
Infrequent2
Events
Frequent1
Events
Infrequent2
Events
Category 1: Buildings where low ambient
vibration is essential for interior operations.
65 VdB3 65 VdB3 –4 –4
Category 2: Residences and buildings
where people normally sleep.
72 VdB 80 VdB 35 dBA 43 dBA
Category 3: Institutional land uses with
primarily daytime use.
75 VdB 83 VdB 40 dBA 48 dBA
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA 2006). 1 Frequent events are defined as more than 70 events per day. 2 Infrequent events are defined as fewer than 70 events per day. 3 This criterion limit is based on levels that are acceptable for most moderately sensitive equipment (e.g., optical
microscopes. Vibration-sensitive manufacturing or research will require detailed evaluation to define the acceptable
vibration levels. Ensuring lower vibration levels in a building often requires special design of the HVAC systems and
stiffened floors. 4 Vibration-sensitive equipment is not sensitive to ground-borne noise.
μin/sec = micro-inches per second
μPa = micro-Pascals
dB = decibels
dBA = A-weighted decibels
FTA = Federal Transit Administration
HVAC = heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning
VdB = vibration velocity decibels
the same community response. This is accounted for in the criteria by distinguishing between projects
with frequent and infrequent events, in which the term “frequent events” is defined as more than 70
events per day.
The criteria for environmental impact from ground-borne vibration and noise are based on the
maximum levels for a single event. Table F lists the potential vibration building damage criteria
associated with construction activities, as suggested in the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact
Assessment (FTA 2006).
FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 102 VdB (equivalent to 0.5 inch per second
[in/sec] in PPV) (FTA, May 2006) is considered safe for buildings consisting of reinforced concrete,
steel, or timber (no plaster), and would not result in any construction vibration damage. For a
nonengineered timber and masonry building, the construction building vibration damage criterion is
94 VdB (0.2 in/sec in PPV). The PPV values for building damage thresholds referenced above are
also shown in Table G, taken from the Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual
(California Department of Transportation [Caltrans] 2013), which included additional building
definition and vibration building damage thresholds.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 12
Table F: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria
Building Category PPV (in/sec) Approximate LV (VdB)1
Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber (no plaster) 0.50 102
Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.30 98
Nonengineered timber and masonry 0.20 94
Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 90
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA 2006). 1 RMS vibration VdB re 1 µin/sec.
µin/sec = inches per second
FTA = Federal Transit Administration
in/sec = inches per second
LV = velocity in decibels
PPV = peak particle velocity
RMS = root-mean-square
VdB = velocity in decibels
Table G: Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria
Structure and Condition
Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Transient
Sources1
Continuous/Frequent
Intermittent Sources2
Extremely fragile historic buildings, ruins, and ancient monuments 0.12 0.08
Fragile buildings 0.20 0.10
Historic and some old buildings 0.50 0.25
Older residential structures 0.50 0.30
New residential structures 1.00 0.50
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.00 0.50
Source: Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans 2013). 1 Transient sources create a single isolated vibration event (e.g., blasting or drop balls).
2 Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-seat
equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment.
Caltrans = California Department of Transportation
in/sec = inches per second
PPV = peak particle velocity
PROJECT IMPACTS
Construction Noise
Short-term noise impacts would be associated with excavation, grading, and erecting of buildings on
site during construction of the proposed project. Construction-related short-term noise levels would
be higher than existing ambient noise levels currently in the project area but would no longer occur
once construction of the project is completed.
Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during the construction of the proposed project.
The first type involves construction crew commutes and the transport of construction equipment and
materials to the site for the proposed project that would incrementally increase noise levels on access
roads leading to the site. Table H lists typical construction equipment noise levels recommended for
noise impact assessments, based on a distance of 50 ft between the equipment and a noise receptor,
taken from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 13
Table H: RCNM Default Noise Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors
Equipment Description
Impact
Device?
Acoustical
Usage
Factor
Spec. 721.560
Lmax at 50 ft
(dBA, slow)
Actual Measured
Lmax at 50 ft
(dBA, slow)
No. of Actual
Data Samples
(Count)
All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85 N/A 0
Auger Drill Rig No 20 85 84 36
Backhoe No 40 80 78 372
Bar Bender No 20 80 N/A 0
Blasting Yes N/A 94 N/A 0
Boring Jack Power Unit No 50 80 83 1
Chain Saw No 20 85 84 46
Clam Shovel (dropping) Yes 20 93 87 4
Compactor (ground) No 20 80 83 57
Compressor (air) No 40 80 78 18
Concrete Batch Plant No 15 83 N/A 0
Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 85 79 40
Concrete Pump Truck No 20 82 81 30
Concrete Saw No 20 90 90 55
Crane No 16 85 81 405
Dozer No 40 85 82 55
Drill Rig Truck No 20 84 79 22
Drum Mixer No 50 80 80 1
Dump Truck No 40 84 76 31
Excavator No 40 85 81 170
Flat Bed Truck No 40 84 74 4
Front-End Loader No 40 80 79 96
Generator No 50 82 81 19
Generator (< 25 kVA, VMS Signs) No 50 70 73 74
Gradall No 40 85 83 70
Grader No 40 85 N/A 0
Grapple (on backhoe) No 40 85 87 1
Horizontal Boring Hydraulic Jack No 25 80 82 6
Hydra Break Ram Yes 10 90 N/A 0
Impact Pile Driver Yes 20 95 101 11
Jackhammer Yes 20 85 89 133
Man Lift No 20 85 75 23
Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram) Yes 20 90 90 212
Pavement Scarifier No 20 85 90 2
Paver No 50 85 77 9
Pickup Truck No 40 55 75 1
Pneumatic Tools No 50 85 85 90
Pumps No 50 77 81 17
Refrigerator Unit No 100 82 73 3
Rivit Buster/Chipping Gun Yes 20 85 79 19
Rock Drill No 20 85 81 3
Roller No 20 85 80 16
Sand Blasting (single nozzle) No 20 85 96 9
Scraper No 40 85 84 12
Sheers (on backhoe) No 40 85 96 5
Slurry Plant No 100 78 78 1
Slurry Trench Machine No 50 82 80 75
Soil Mix Drill Rig No 50 80 N/A 0
Tractor No 40 84 N/A 0
Vacuum Excavator (Vac-Truck) No 40 85 85 149
Vacuum Street Sweeper No 10 80 82 19
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 14
Table H: RCNM Default Noise Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors
Equipment Description
Impact
Device?
Acoustical
Usage
Factor
Spec. 721.560
Lmax at 50 ft
(dBA, slow)
Actual Measured
Lmax at 50 ft
(dBA, slow)
No. of Actual
Data Samples
(Count)
Ventilation Fan No 100 85 79 13
Vibrating Hopper No 50 85 87 1
Vibratory Concrete Mixer No 20 80 80 1
Vibratory Pile Driver No 20 95 101 44
Warning Horn No 5 85 83 12
Welder/Torch No 40 73 74 5
Source: Highway Construction Noise Handbook (FHWA 2006).
dBA = A-weighted decibels
FHWA = Federal Highway Administration
ft = foot/feet
HP = horsepower
kVA = kilovolt-amperes
Lmax = maximum instantaneous noise level
N/A = Not Applicable
RCNM = Roadway Construction Noise Model
Spec. = Specification
VMS = variable message sign
(RCNM; FHWA 2006). As shown in Table H, there will be a relatively high single-event noise
exposure potential at a maximum level of 81 dBA Lmax with trucks passing at 50 ft. However, the
projected construction traffic will be small when compared to the existing traffic volumes on Beach
Boulevard and West Ball Road, and associated long-term noise-level changes will not be perceptible.
Therefore, short-term construction-related worker commutes and equipment transport noise impacts
would not be substantial.
The second type of short-term noise impact is related to noise generated during excavation, grading,
and construction on site. Construction is performed in discrete steps, each of which has its own mix of
equipment and, consequently, its own noise characteristics. These various sequential phases would
change the character of the noise generated on site. Therefore, the noise levels vary as construction
progresses. Despite the variety in the type and size of construction equipment, similarities in the
dominant noise sources and patterns of operation allow construction-related noise ranges to be
categorized by work phase.
Typical maximum noise levels range up to 90 dBA Lmax at 50 ft during the noisiest construction
phases. The site preparation phase, which includes excavation and grading of the site, tends to
generate the highest noise levels because earthmoving machinery is the noisiest construction
equipment. Earthmoving equipment includes excavating machinery such as backfillers, bulldozers,
draglines, and front loaders. Earthmoving and compacting equipment includes compactors, scrapers,
and graders. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or
two minutes of full-power operation followed by three or four minutes at lower-power settings.
Construction of the proposed project is expected to require the use of heavy-duty construction
equipment (e.g., scrapers, bulldozers, and water and pickup trucks). This equipment would be used on
the project site. Based on the information in Table H, the maximum noise level generated by each
scraper on the proposed project site is assumed to be 84 dBA Lmax at 50 ft from the scraper. Each
bulldozer would also generate 82 dBA Lmax at 50 ft. The maximum noise level generated by water
and pickup trucks is approximately 75 dBA Lmax at 50 ft from these vehicles. Each doubling of the
sound sources with equal strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Assuming there would be two
scrapers (84 dBA + 84 dBA = 87 dBA), two bulldozers (82 dBA + 82 dBA = 85 dBA), and two
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 15
water/pickup trucks (75 dBA + 75 dBA = 78 dBA) operating at the same time, and that each piece of
construction equipment operates at some distance from the other equipment, the worst-case combined
noise level during this phase of construction would be 90 dBA Lmax (87 dBA + 85 dBA + 78 dBA =
90 dBA) at a distance of 50 ft from the active construction area.
The closest existing noise sensitive receivers in the vicinity of the project area are motel rooms that
are approximately 50 ft to the north/northwest of the project site. These closest sensitive receptors
may be subject to short-term noise reaching 90 dBA Lmax, generated by construction activities near
the project boundary. However, because there are no outdoor active use areas (e.g., balconies or
decks) associated with the motel directly adjacent to the project site, no noise exposure impacts would
occur to the guests of the motel. Other noise sensitive uses farther away from the project site would
experience lower construction noise from the project construction activities. Compliance with the
hours specified in the City’s Municipal Code regarding construction activities will result in a less than
significant noise impact on adjacent sensitive land uses.
Construction Vibration Building Damage Potential. Ground-borne noise and vibration from
construction activity would be mostly low to moderate. Bulldozers and other heavy-tracked
construction equipment generate approximately 87 VdB of ground-borne vibration when measured at
25 ft, based on the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA, May 2006). This range of
ground-borne vibration levels would dissipate with distance from the project site and would not result
in any human annoyance at the nearest motel, which is approximately 50 ft from the project
construction activity, and definitely would not cause any damage to the motel buildings 50 ft from the
project site. As shown in Tables F and G, it would take a minimum of 90 VdB (or 0.12 in/sec PPV) to
cause any potential building damage to the adjacent motel.
As shown in Table F, FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 102 VdB (equivalent to
0.5 in/sec in PPV) (FTA 2006) is considered safe for buildings consisting of reinforced concrete,
steel, or timber (no plaster), and would not result in any construction vibration damage. For a
nonengineered timber and masonry building, the construction vibration damage criterion is 94 VdB
(or 0.2 in/sec in PPV). Table I further shows the PPV values at 25 ft from the construction vibration
sources and vibration levels (in terms of VdB) at 25 ft from construction vibration sources.
The project site is bounded by an existing motel to the north, West Ball Road to the south, an existing
gas station to the west, and commercial uses to the east (across an alley). None of these buildings are
within 25 ft of the project construction area. For motel or other commercial buildings adjacent to the
project site, which belong to the category of modern commercial buildings in Table G, it would take a
vibration level of more than 2 in/sec PPV (or 114 VdB) from a transient source to potentially result in
any building damage for modern commercial buildings. Even for a continuous/frequent intermittent
source, the vibration damage potential threshold is 0.5 in/sec (or 102 VdB) from a transient source.
Table I shows that none of the construction activities anticipated on the project site would result in a
vibration level that would reach 2 in/sec PPV (or 114 VdB) from a transient source or 0.5 in/sec PPV
(or 102 VdB) from a continuous/frequent intermittent source. Therefore, no building damage to
existing buildings in the project vicinity would occur as a result of the project construction.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 16
Table I: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction Equipment
Equipment
Reference PPV/LV at 25 ft
PPV (in/sec) LV (VdB)1
Pile Driver (Impact), Typical 0.644 104
Pile Driver (Sonic), Typical 0.170 93
Vibratory Roller 0.210 94
Hoe Ram 0.089 87
Large Bulldozer2 0.089 87
Caisson Drilling 0.089 87
Loaded Trucks 0.076 86
Jackhammer 0.035 79
Small Bulldozer 0.003 58
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA 2006). 1 RMS vibration velocity in decibels (VdB) re 1 µin/sec.
2 Equipment shown in bold is expected to be used on site.
µin/sec = micro-inches per second
ft = feet/foot
FTA = Federal Transit Administration
in/sec = inches per second
LV = velocity in decibels
PPV = peak particle velocity
RMS = root-mean-square
VdB = vibration velocity in decibels
Construction Vibration Human Annoyance Potential. Bulldozers and other heavy-tracked
construction equipment generate approximately 87 VdB of ground-borne vibration when measured at
25 ft, based on the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA, May 2006). This level of
ground-borne vibration exceeds the threshold of human perception, which is around 65 VdB.
Construction vibration, similar to vibration from other sources, would not have any significant effect
on outdoor activities (e.g., those in the outdoor gathering areas at the motel to the north/northwest).
Vibration levels from standard construction equipment are shown below for various pieces of
construction equipment that are expected to be used on the project site:
Large dozers, front-end loaders, grader, and backhoe (87 VdB at 25 ft)
Loaded trucks (86 VdB at 25 ft)
Jackhammers and forklift (79 VdB at 25 ft)
Based on the following formula for vibration transmission (FTA, May 2006),
LvdB (D) = LvdB (25 ft) - 30 Log (D/25)
a vibration level at 50 ft is 9 VdB lower than the vibration level at 25 ft. Vibration at 100 ft from the
source is 18 VdB lower than the vibration level at 25 ft. Vibration at 200 ft from the source is 27 VdB
lower than the vibration level at 25 ft.
Table J lists the projected vibration level from various construction equipment expected to be used on
the project site to the sensitive uses in the project vicinity. For typical construction activity, the
equipment with the highest vibration generation potential is the large dozer, which would generate
87 VdB at 25 ft. With the vibration attenuation through distance divergence, the vibration from
project construction would be reduced to (87 - 9 =) 78 VdB (or 0.04 in/sec) or lower at the nearest
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 17
Table J: Summary of Construction Equipment and Activity Vibration
Equipment/Activity
Vibration Level (VdB)
At 25 ft
Distance
Attenuation
Intervening Buildings/
Sound Walls1
Maximum
Vibration Level
Travel Inn to the north/northwest, 50 ft
Large dozers,2 front-end loaders, grader, and
backhoe
87 9 0 78
Loaded trucks 86 9 0 77
Jackhammers and forklift 79 9 0 70
Source: Compiled by LSA Associates, Inc. (2016). 1 Intervening buildings/sound walls put weight on the transmission path and provide a damping effect on vibration. No
damping effect was assumed as a worst-case scenario. 2 Large dozers represent the construction equipment with the highest vibration potential that would be used on site. Other
equipment would result in lower vibration compared to that of large dozers.
ft = foot/feet
FTA = Federal Transit Administration
VdB = vibration velocity decibels
motel buildings north/northwest of the project site, which is 50 ft from the nearest on-site
construction activity. Therefore, the vibration level from the project construction would not exceed
the vibration threshold for human annoyance at the nearest sensitive-use building to the
north/northwest (i.e., the Travel Inn).
Traffic Noise
The proposed project (i.e., a car wash facility) is not a noise-sensitive use. Therefore, no significant
traffic noise impact on the proposed use would occur. In addition, traffic associated with the proposed
project would contribute to less than 5 percent of the total traffic volume to Beach Boulevard and
West Ball Road and would not result in any measurable increase in traffic noise along these two
roads, where the project traffic enters and leaves the project site. Therefore, no significant off-site
traffic noise impact would occur.
Car Wash Dryers Noise
Among the proposed car wash facility operating components, the dryers would be the highest noise-
generating component. Other components would generate noise levels that are at least 10 dBA lower
than the dryers. Therefore, the following focuses on the potential dryer noise and associated
mitigation measures, if required.
Air One Profiler Dryer. The proposed car wash facility has included sample noise readings from Air
One Profiler Dryers that would be placed at the west end and inside the wash tunnel. Table K shows
the noise level readings at the source and at 5 ft increments (readings straight out from the source).
These readings are with all three profiler producers in the “on” position. A figure showing the noise
readings’ dropoff is included in Appendix A. Based on these readings, dryer noise at a distance of
70 ft from the dryer would be approximately 78 dBA Lmax.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 18
Table K: Decibel Readings on Air One Profiler Dryers (dBA)
Machine 5 ft 10 ft 15 ft 20 ft 25 ft 30 ft 35 ft 40 ft
Air One Profiler Dryer 97 94 93 90 88 85 84 83
Source: Motor City Wash Works
dBA = A-weighted decibel
ft = feet/foot
LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) has conducted noise impact analyses for other car wash facilities. The
following discusses the dryer noise evaluated for these car wash facilities.
Proto-Vest Dryer with Silencer. Noise levels from the Proto-Vest dryers measured at various
distances from the car wash tunnel are listed in Table L. All of these measurements are based on the
listed machines in a building with doors open and were taken from the exit end of the (wet wash
tunnel) bay.
Table L: Decibel Readings on Proto-Vest Dryers with Silencer Package (dBA)
Machine 10 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft
Windshear InBay – (2) 25 hp dryer 88.0 82.0 78.4 76.0 74.0 72.4
Windshear – 30 hp dryer 76.9 70.9 67.4 64.9 63.0 61.5
Windshear II – (2) 30 hp dryer 88.0 81.9 78.4 75.4 74.0 72.5
TopShot – 30 hp dryer 76.9 70.9 67.4 64.9 63.0 61.5
TopShot II – (2) 30 hp dryer 88.0 81.9 78.4 75.9 74.0 72.5
SideShot – 15 hp dryer 74.5 68.5 64.9 62.4 60.5 59.0
SideShot II – 30 hp dryer 76.9 70.9 67.4 64.9 63.0 61.5
90N/90XS – 15 hp dryer 74.5 68.5 64.9 62.4 60.5 59.0
U325/90NU/90XSU – 30 hp dryer 76.9 70.9 67.4 64.9 63.0 61.5
Source: Proto-Vest, Inc.
dBA = A-weighted decibel
ft = feet/foot
hp = horsepower
These noise levels are generally in line with the noise levels measured by LSA at The Car Spa in the
City of Irvine (Culver Boulevard and Deerfield Avenue). As the measurement results for the Irvine
car wash facility showed, vacuum with pump noise generated 64 dBA Lmax at 50 ft and 56 dBA Lmax
at 80 ft (behind a 5-ft-high wall). Pressured water spray generated 66 dBA Lmax at 50 ft (inside the
tunnel) and 63 dBA Lmax at 100 ft. The dryer inside the wash tunnel generated 74 dBA Lmax at 50 ft
(inside the tunnel), 68 dBA Lmax at 75 ft (inside the tunnel), and 57 dBA Lmax at 100 ft. When
measured outside the tunnel at 60 ft from the exit end, these noise levels would be reduced to levels
similar to or lower than those listed in Table L. Noise associated with high pressure blow-dry
operations generated 78 dBA Lmax at 50 ft and 55 dBA Lmax at 80 ft (behind a 5-ft-high wall). Based
on Table L, the highest noise level generated by Proto-Vest Car Wash’s machine is approximately
60.2 dBA Lmax at 70 ft.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-2016-for PDF.doc «04/12/16» 19
Ryko Dryer. Noise levels from Ryko Car Wash’s equipment measured at various distances from the
car wash machine are listed in Table M, based on LSA’s previous noise study on a Redlands car wash
facility. These measurements were taken with a Bruel & Kaer Model 2230 Sound Level Meter with a
Bruel & Kaer Model 1624 Octave Filter Set attached. All of these measurements are based on the
listed machines in a building with doors open and were taken from the exit end of the (wet wash
tunnel) bay.
Table M: Decibel Readings on Ryko Car Washes (dBA)
Machine 10 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft
SoftGloss XS with Thrust Pro Dryer 84.0 80.0 74.0 71.0 69.0 64.0
SoftGloss XS with On Board Dry 81.5 77.4 73.2 69.5 65.4 61.2
SAW with Thrust Pro Dryer 84.0 80.0 74.0 71.0 69.0 64.0
SAW with On Board Dry 81.5 77.5 72.9 68.4 65.5 61.3
Monarch II-HI with Thrust Pro Dryer 84.0 80.0 74.0 71.0 69.0 64.0
Monarch II-HI with On Board Dry 82.0 77.9 74.0 69.8 66.0 62.5
US-2001 with Thrust Pro Dryer 84.0 80.0 74.0 71.0 69.0 64.0
US-2001 with On Board Dry 79.5 75.5 70.9 67.2 63.5 59.6
VT-2000 with Thrust Pro Dryer 80.5 76.3 72.5 68.3 64.5 61.5
Contour with Thrust Pro Dryer 84.0 80.0 74.0 71.0 69.0 64.0
Contour with On Board Dry 74.2 70.1 66.2 62.5 58.4 54.3
Venture with Thrust Pro Dryer 84.0 80.0 74.0 71.0 69.0 64.0
Venture with On Board Dry 74.2 70.1 66.2 62.5 58.4 54.3
Source: Ryko Car Washes
dBA = A-weighted decibel
ft = feet/foot
These noise levels are generally in line with the noise levels measured by LSA at The Car Spa at
Culver Boulevard and Deerfield Avenue in the City of Irvine. As the measurement results for the
Irvine car wash facility show, the vacuum with pump noise generated 64 dBA Lmax at 50 ft and
56 dBA Lmax at 80 ft (behind a 5-ft-high wall). Pressured water spray generated 66 dBA Lmax at 50 ft
(inside the tunnel) and 63 dBA Lmax at 100 ft. The dryer inside the wash tunnel generated 74 dBA
Lmax at 50 ft (inside the tunnel), 68 dBA Lmax at 75 ft (inside the tunnel), and 57 dBA Lmax at 100 ft.
When measured outside the tunnel at 60 ft from the exit end, these noise levels would be reduced to
levels similar to or lower than those listed in Table M. Noise associated with high-pressure blow-dry
operations generated 78 dBA Lmax at 50 ft and 55 dBA Lmax at 80 ft (behind a 5-ft-high wall). Based
on Table M, the highest noise level generated by Ryko Car Wash’s machine is approximately
62.7 dBA Lmax at 70 ft.
Based on the above discussion, it seems the Air One Profiler dryers would generate 15 to 18 dBA
higher noise compared to the Proto-Vest and Ryko dryers used at other car wash facilities. For a
conservative impact analysis, this noise impact analysis uses the noise levels generated by Air One
Profiler dryers.
Existing motel rooms to the north/northwest (approximately 70 ft from the dryers inside the car wash
tunnel) would receive noise attenuation from distance divergence (compared to the noise level
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-4-13-2016-for PDF.doc «04/14/16» 20
measured at 50 ft) and partial shielding from the car wash tunnel structure (assuming the windows are
not directly exposed to the dryers).
Therefore, the maximum noise level that would be experienced at the adjacent motel rooms from the
car wash/dryer operation of the proposed car wash facility would be up to 78 dBA Lmax. This range of
noise levels would exceed the City’s maximum exterior noise limits for residential uses (60 dBA from
7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). Because it is not anticipated that there will be car wash use during nighttime
hours (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.), no car wash operational noise would occur during those hours.
Because there are no outdoor living areas (e.g., balconies or decks) associated with the motel that
would be directly exposed to the car wash noise, no outdoor active use areas would experience
significant noise impacts. Traffic on Beach Boulevard generates steady ambient noise with maximum
noise levels higher than the noise associated with the proposed car wash facility. With the prevailing
ambient noise higher than potential noise from the proposed car wash facility, any significant noise
impacts are not expected to occur at adjacent land uses. Therefore, no significant car wash noise
impacts are expected for the motel to the north and northwest of the project site.
Typical sound level reduction of buildings in a warm climate (e.g., Southern California) is 12 dBA
with windows open and 24 dBA with windows closed (Protective Noise Levels, United States
Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] 550/9-79-100, November 1978). Based on the project’s site
plan, the closest motel rooms adjacent to the dryers inside the wash tunnel on the project site are more
than 70 ft from the proposed dryers at the car wash facility. The maximum interior noise levels inside
the motel rooms, attributable to the car wash operations, would be reduced to 66 dBA Lmax or lower
with windows open and 54 dBA Lmax or lower with windows closed. The interior noise level with
windows closed scenario is below the typical residential use interior noise levels of 65 dBA Lmax that
should not be exceeded at any time. However, if the dryers were to operate for more than 15 minutes
in any hour, they could exceed the noise level of 50 dBA that should not be exceeded inside the motel
rooms. When this scenario would occur, windows for motel rooms that are directly exposed to the
proposed car wash tunnel should be upgraded to have a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 32
(STC-32) or higher. All double-paned/dual-glazed windows would meet such minimum STC rating.
Motel rooms that would be potentially exposed to noise levels that would result in the interior noise
level to exceed 45 dBA include 14 guest rooms (7 on the first floor and 7 on the second floor) on the
western end of the motel to the north/northwest of the proposed wash tunnel. With the windows
providing sufficient exterior-to-interior noise attenuation, no significant interior noise impacts would
occur for neighboring motel uses as a result of the proposed car wash operations.
Long-Term Ground-Borne Noise and Vibration from Vehicular Traffic
Because the rubber tires and suspension systems of buses and other on-road vehicles provide
vibration isolation and reduce noise, it is unusual for on-road vehicles to cause ground-borne noise or
vibration problems. When on-road vehicles cause such effects as the rattling of windows, the source
is almost always airborne noise. Most problems with on-road vehicle-related noise and vibration can
be directly related to a pothole, bump, expansion joint, or other discontinuity in the road surface.
Smoothing the bump or filling the pothole will usually solve the problem. The proposed project
would have roads with smooth pavement and would not result in significant ground-borne noise or
vibration impacts from vehicular traffic.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-4-13-2016-for PDF.doc «04/14/16» 21
The proposed car wash facility, including the dryers, would not result in substantial groundborne
vibration, and would not cause any building damages or human annoyance at the adjacent motel.
No significant vibration impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required.
MITIGATION MEASURES
Construction Noise
Construction activities will be restricted within the City to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., and are
prohibited on Sundays and federal holidays.
The following measures can be implemented to reduce potential construction noise impacts on nearby
sensitive receptors:
During all site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction
equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with
manufacturers’ standards.
The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is
directed away from sensitive receptors nearest to the project site.
The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest
practical distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors
nearest to the project site during all project construction.
Construction contractors shall provide the Building Division a name and phone number of a
contact person in the event that noise levels become disruptive. The name and phone number
shall also be posted on site, informing the public who to contact. The Building Division shall
monitor compliance.
Traffic Noise and Vibration
No mitigation is required.
Car Wash Noise and Vibration
The following mitigation is required if the proposed car wash dryers would be operating for more
than 15 minutes in any hour during the operational periods:
Double-paned or dual-glazed windows with STC-32 or higher would be required for motel rooms
that are directly exposed to the car wash dryers noise, which include 14 rooms (7 on first floor
and 7 on second floor) on the western portion of the motel to the north/northwest of the wash
tunnel.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-4-13-2016-for PDF.doc «04/14/16» 22
LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
With implementation of the identified mitigation measures, potential short-term and long-term noise
impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance.
REFERENCES
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2004. Transportation-Related Earthborne
Vibrations (Caltrans Experiences) Technical Advisory, Vibration. TAV-04-01-R201. January
23.
Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Appendix G,
Public Resource Code Sections 15000–15387. 2016.
———. 2013. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. September.
City of Anaheim, 2006. Municipal Code. April 25 (last revision).
———. 2004. Noise Element of the General Plan. May.
———. 2006. Highway Construction Noise Handbook. Roadway Construction Noise Model,
FHWA-HEP-06-015. DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-06-02. NTIS No. PB2006-109012. August.
Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2006. Office of Planning and Environment. Transit Noise and
Vibration Impact Assessment. FTA-VA-90-1003-06. May.
Harris, Cyril M., editor. 1991. Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, Third
Edition.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1978. Protective Noise Levels, Condensed
Version of EPA Levels Document, EPA 550/9-79-100. November.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
A PRIL 2016
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANAHEIM EXPRESS WASH
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
P:\AEW1601\Noise-4-13-2016-for PDF.doc «04/14/16»
APPENDIX A
MOTOR CITY WASH WORKS
DRYER NOISE DECIBEL LEVEL READINGS
97
D
B
a
94
D
B
a
93
D
B
a
90
D
B
a
88
D
B
a
30
F
e
e
t
25
F
e
e
t
20
F
e
e
t
15
F
e
e
t
10
F
e
e
t
5
F
e
e
t
NO
I
S
E
L
E
V
E
L
R
E
A
D
I
N
G
S
A
T
S
O
U
R
C
E
A
N
D
A
T
5
F
O
O
T
I NC
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
-
R
E
A
D
I
N
G
S
S
T
R
A
I
G
H
T
O
U
T
F
R
O
M
S
O
U
R
C
E
R EA
D
I
N
G
S
A
R
E
W
I
T
H
A
L
L
3
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
R
P
R
O
D
U
C
E
R
S
I
N
"ON
"
P
O
S
I
T
I
O
N
DR
Y
E
R
N
O
I
S
E
L
E
V
E
L
R
E
A
D
I
N
G
S
85
D
B
a
35
F
e
e
t
84
D
B
a
40
F
e
e
t
83
D
B
a
6/9/16 (P:\AEW1601\NoiseMEMO6-2016.doc)
L S A A S S OC IA T ES , INC .
20 EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE 200
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614
949.553.0666 TEL
949.553.8076 FAX
BERKELEY
CARLSBAD
FORT COLLINS
FRESNO
PALM SPRINGS
PT. RICHMOND
RIVERSIDE
ROCKLIN
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:DATE:DATE:DATE: June 9, 2016
TO:TO:TO:TO: Jeremy Levine, Anaheim Express Wash LLC
FROM:FROM:FROM:FROM: Tony Chung, Ph.D.
SUBJECT:SUBJECT:SUBJECT:SUBJECT: Car Wash Dryer Noise Mitigation at Anaheim Express Wash
LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) prepared a Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis (LSA, April 2016) for
the proposed Anaheim Express Wash in the City of Anaheim, California (City). The City requested
that noise mitigation be implemented on the project site and not on the adjacent property. Therefore,
the following mitigation measure proposed by the Project Applicant is evaluated and has been
confirmed that it would reduce the operational noise from the car wash facility, including the dryers
inside the wash tunnel, at the motel guest rooms to meet the interior noise requirements.
• An 8-foot-high concrete block wall will be constructed along the property line between
the project site and the adjacent motel, Travel Inn, with 7 feet of transparent material
installed on top of the concrete block wall.
This is effectively a 15-foot-high noise barrier (see attached schematic design in attachment A) that
will block the direct line-of-sight between the car wash dryers and any receiver at the property line
between the project site and the adjacent Travel Inn, and provide sufficient noise attenuation for a
receiver standing along the property line to meet the City’s 60 dBA noise level requirement for sound
generating sources.
The transparent material can be consisted of acrylic, plexiglass, or any other material that meets the
minimum requirement of 4 pounds per square feet (lbs/sq. ft.). Attachment B lists the weight versus
thickness comparison for plexiglass for your information. It is estimated that plexiglass with a
thickness of 0.705 inches will meet the density requirements for an effective noise barrier use.
Attachment A: Schematic Design of Sound Wall along the Northern Property Line.
Attachment B: Sample Plexiglass Weights per Square Foot versus thickness.
6/9/16 (P:\AEW1601\NoiseMEMO6-2016.doc) 2
L S A A S S OC IA T ES , INC .
ATTACHMENT A
NOISE BARRIER SCHEMATIC DESIGN
6/9/16 (P:\AEW1601\NoiseMEMO6-2016.doc) 4
L S A A S S OC IA T ES , INC .
ATTACHMENT B
SAMPLE DATA FOR WEIGHT VERSUS THICKNESS FOR
PLEXIGLASS
NEW CORRESPONDENCE
ITEM NO. 3
1
Elly Morris
From:Amanda <aedinger@sbcglobal.net>
Sent:Sunday, July 10, 2016 8:00 PM
To:Planning Commission
Cc:Jonathan Borrego
Subject:924-926 Blvd/Anaheim Express Car Wash
Anaheim Planning Commissioners,
Tomorrow's Planning Commission meeting contains an item pertaining to a car wash at the corner of
Beach and Ball. The developer is requesting to revitalize the old Lyndy's Motel signs in connection
with the project. I have been in contact with the Planning Department as well as the agent for the
developer, Mr. Schwartze, stating my objection to the use of the old signs.
I am a member of the Beach Blvd Specific Plan Committee and we have spent much time and effort
discussing the theme and vision for Beach Blvd. The old motel signs carry significant negative
connotations for many as they represent the persistent crime, prostitution and drug use that has and
continues to be pervasive along Beach Blvd. The Lyndy's sign is not a qualifying business that we are
proud of. The purpose of the Beach Blvd Plan should be to move us forward toward the future and I
believe these signs keep us in the troubled past.
In addition to the negative imagery, the Lyndy's sign on Beach Blvd. is 40 feet tall and the Ball Road
sign is 20 feet tall. Both signs are large and are substantially taller than what would be allowable
under current statute. I ask that the Commission delay recommendation pertaining to the signs to a
later date to either be decided by the Commission or alternatively for the final design to be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Department. The developer has expressed that they are willing to meet
with the community to receive input on the best sizing and design for the sign. We would like the
opportunity to take the developer up on his offer.
Thank you,
Amanda Edinger
1
Elly Morris
From:jodie mosley <jodiemosley@yahoo.com>
Sent:Sunday, July 10, 2016 8:59 PM
To:Amanda; Planning Commission
Cc:Jonathan Borrego
Subject:Re: 924-926 Blvd/Anaheim Express Car Wash
I would like to add that the future zoning for the current businesses on Beach have been planned to be a mix of
residential and commercial. No current signage that exists now will be used in the future. Thus the integrity of
the consistency will be marred. Please note if there is to be a theme in the future, a new "beach" theme would be
a nice direction, as highway 39, Beach blvd., is historically known as a direct street to the beach. And makes
more sense, than trying to resurrect old signs we are fighting to improve and moderize.
Thank you
Jodie Mosley
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Amanda
<aedinger@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Anaheim Planning Commissioners,
Tomorrow's Planning Commission meeting contains an item pertaining to a car wash at the corner of
Beach and Ball. The developer is requesting to revitalize the old Lyndy's Motel signs in connection
with the project. I have been in contact with the Planning Department as well as the agent for the
developer, Mr. Schwartze, stating my objection to the use of the old signs.
I am a member of the Beach Blvd Specific Plan Committee and we have spent much time and effort
discussing the theme and vision for Beach Blvd. The old motel signs carry significant negative
connotations for many as they represent the persistent crime, prostitution and drug use that has and
continues to be pervasive along Beach Blvd. The Lyndy's sign is not a qualifying business that we are
proud of. The purpose of the Beach Blvd Plan should be to move us forward toward the future and I
believe these signs keep us in the troubled past.
In addition to the negative imagery, the Lyndy's sign on Beach Blvd. is 40 feet tall and the Ball Road
sign is 20 feet tall. Both signs are large and are substantially taller than what would be allowable
under current statute. I ask that the Commission delay recommendation pertaining to the signs to a
later date to either be decided by the Commission or alternatively for the final design to be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Department. The developer has expressed that they are willing to meet
with the community to receive input on the best sizing and design for the sign. We would like the
opportunity to take the developer up on his offer.
Thank you,
Amanda Edinger
1
Elly Morris
From:Jonathan Borrego
Sent:Monday, July 11, 2016 1:17 PM
To:Lisandro Orozco; Gustavo Gonzalez
Cc:Elly Morris
Subject:FW: Car Wash on Tonight's Agenda
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
Please make sure this one is brought to the Commission’s attention too.
From: Esther Wallace [mailto:eswall@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 1:12 PM
To: planingcommission@anaheim.net
Cc: Jonathan Borrego
Subject: Car Wash on Tonight's Agenda
I am writing to express my concern over the signage proposed for the car wash on
tonight's Planning Commission agenda. My concern is the 40 ft. sign.
At the car wash site there is a 20 ft. sign on Ball Road but there is a 40 ft. sign on
Beach Blvd. I am not happy about the 40 ft. sign. We will be getting new signage
when the Beach Blvd. Renewal plan goes into action now to be approved next year. I
do not want to see a 40 ft. sign at that site. If this is approved, some of the new
businesses will want a 40 ft. sign when they are approved and built. We have been
told since there was already a 40 ft. sign there, the car wash owner has a right to
have one also. That might be so if everything would be status quo but we will be in a
transition time soon when I would hope we would be getting more modified signs to
fit the character of the planned thorough way which is undetermined at this
time. The signage was never presented at my WAND meeting when the plans were
given to us.
The motels already want glitzy signs - some with flashing lights. If the car wash
business will be so good, which is repeated several times in the lengthy 88 page write
up, why does he need such a high and glitzy sign also. We are trying to change the
character of Beach Blvd. so that no evidence of its racy past is evident in the
future. Somehow there should be a statement in the CUP that this sign will need to
meet the requirements of the planned signage which is yet to be determined. I do
not want this sign to be the stimulus for future signage.
NEW CORRESPONDENCE
ITEM NO. 3
2
Parking spaces will also be at a premium at busy times when it is possible for 120 cars
to go through the car wash. How long will people take to wipe off windows, chrome,
hubcaps etc. plus vacuum and clean out their cars while some of course will not do
this at all. With five employees who must park their cars on the premises that leaves
only 21 spaces for cars to vacuum.
With two ingress/outgress places on Ball Road, where does the public bus load and
unload passengers? As to noise factor, add in the noise of the vacuums
running. When the Vault was added, we were aware of the apartments behind the
carwash area and the Vault did not have air conditioning so their windows will be open
all summer. How will they be affected?
I would appreciate your consideration to these points in your deliberation's this
evening since I am unable to attend the meeting.
Esther Wallace
WAND Chairman
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
April 4, 2018
Law Offices of Edmund C. Hoy
2627 Mission Street, Suite 1
San Marino, CA 91108
RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2016-05857
ANAHEIM EXPRESS CARWASH – 926 S. BEACH BOULEVARD
Dear Mr. Hoy,
The City of Anaheim received a copy of your letter dated February 14, 2018 and
addressed to Mr. McElroy, the owner of the new Anaheim Express Carwash
(project) located at 2961 West Ball Road. The letter erroneously states that condition
43 of Resolution No. PC2016-058 under Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2016-05857
"reflects the City of Anaheim’s minimum requirement to partially alleviate and/or
abate sounds and other noises" from the project and makes requests of Mr. McElroy
beyond the requirements of the CUP.
As a point of clarification, the replacement of 14 windows along the southerly side of
Mr. Liu’s motel and adjacent to the project site were not required for the project to
comply with the City’s Noise Code. As noted in the noise study addendum provided
by LSA Associates, Inc. (dated June 9, 2016) and the CUP’s environmental analysis,
it was determined that the construction of a new 15-foot-high noise barrier along
northerly property line of Mr. McElroy’s property would effectively minimize noise
impacts in compliance with the Noise Code. While not necessary to meet the
minimum requirements of the Noise Code, at its meeting of July 11, 2016 the
Planning Commission added condition 43 (condition) as a “good neighbor” policy to
the adopted resolution, requiring the replacement of the 14 windows along the
southerly side of Mr. Liu’s motel. Based on the adopted resolution, Mr. McElroy is
not required to provide any additional improvements to Mr. Liu’s property beyond
those required by the condition, which states:
“The applicant shall fund the cost incurred by the owner of the motel
immediately adjacent to and north of the subject property to retrofit those 14
motel room windows (7 on the first floor and 7 on the second floor located
immediately above the 7 first floor windows) located between the westerly
exit of the automotive washing tunnel along the southerly facade of the hotel
towards Beach Boulevard. The retrofitting shall consist of double -paned or
dual -glazed windows with STC -32 or higher. This condition may be satisfied
by the applicant obtaining and delivering to the Planning Director a letter
from the owner of the motel confirming that the applicant has provided funds
to the owner of the motel sufficient to pay for the window retrofitting,
regardless of whether the work of retrofitting has been performed or
completed.”
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
The condition further states:
“The Planning Director is authorized to waive the applicant's compliance with this
condition and deem this condition satisfied and of no further force and effect upon an
evidentiary showing by the applicant that its best efforts to fund the window retrofitting
have been declined, refused or ignored by the owner of the motel after repeated and
exhaustive attempts over a reasonable period of time.”
As noted in the correspondence from Mr. McElroy to Mr. Liu (see enclosures), Mr. McElroy has
contacted Mr. Liu on several occasions and attempted to satisfy the condition. To avoid any
further delays to the project’s completion, please advise Mr. McElroy, within 14 days of the date
of this letter, of your election to have Mr. McElroy replace the 14 windows with double -paned
or dual -glazed windows with STC -32 or higher and make reasonable accommodations to allow
the work to be completed in a timely manner, or to make a cash payment for the cost of the 14
windows with double-paned or dual-glazed windows with a rating of at least STC-32. While it is
the City’s hope that Mr. Liu will state his preference within the 14-day period so that this matter
may be concluded in a manner that would seem to benefit your client, failure to advise Mr.
McElroy within the 14-day period will result in the City’s waiver of the condition.
If you would to meet with City staff and Mr. McElroy to discuss this issue further, please contact
Lisandro Orozco, Planner, at (714) 765-5381 or lorozco@anaheim.net to schedule a time to
meet.
Sincerely,
David Belmer
Planning and Building Director
Enclosures
cc: Robert McElroy, Anaheim Express Carwash, 926. S. Beach Blvd, Anaheim, CA 92804
Ping Li Lui, Travel Inn Motel, 920 S. Beach Blvd, Anaheim, CA 92804
(Contractor)Delivery
(Dealer)Pick-Up
(Home Owner)Install
DATE
Shipping Address:
Job Name:
Tel No.:PO#:
Email:Deliver, Pick-Up, Install Pick-Up
Glass
Width Height Type Ex Trim White Other Type Type Pattern
1 68 45 1/2 XO RETRO X LOW E N N $510.00 14 $7,140.00
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Total 14
7,140.00$
624.75$
O X x x 2,030.00$
9,794.75$
Slides LEFT to RIGHT Double Ended Horizontal Slider 4,897.37$
Single Hung (Vertical Slider)Slides RIGHT to LEFT 4,897.38$
Buyer's Acceptance: Date:
Seller's Approval:Date:
Customer:
Address:
City & Zip:
Sales Taxes
Window/Size
7/17/2018
STC RATING
Anaheim Express Car Wash
Terra-Nova Windows Inc.
Line TotalUnit
Price QtyComments
2961 W Ball Rd
Anaheim CA
714-915-9622
Window/Type Grids or Blinds
6164 River Crest Drive. Riverside CA 92507
Tel. 888-713-9997 Fax 951-602-6096
Email: retrofitvinylwindows@gmail.com web site: www.retrofitvinylwindows.com
Item Colors
Subtotal
Installation
New Balance
Total
Deposit
Discount
X O
SH
o
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
PURCHASE ORDER AGREEMENT
PO:
Sales Person:
Tel: (951) 653-0632
Fax: (951) 653-0671
1. Quotes: All quotes are ONLY valid 30 days from the date of offer. Prices are subject to change without notice.
o instalación. NO habra reembolso para ordenes confirmadas y pagadas.
y diseño.
Buyer's Acceptance: Date:
3. Especificaciones de Orden: Los clientes son responsables de confirmar que toda la información de su orden este corecto, esto incluye el tipo de vidrio, marco, rejilla,
1. Presupuestos: Todos los presupuestos solo son validos 30 dias desde la fecha de la oferta. Los precios estan sujetos a cambio sin previo aviso.
2. Condiciónes de Pago: Para todos las ordenes, se requiere un deposito de 50% del importe total. Saldo a pagar en su totalidad en el momento de recojer /entrega,
4. Inspection Codes: Please check city inspection codes before placing an order with Terra Nova Windows Inc. Terra Nova windows Inc will not be held responsible for
any specific code requirements by city or state.
5. Reviewing Purchase: Clients are responsible for inspecting their items from any visual defects at the time of pick up or delivery. Customer must inform
Terra Nova Windows Inc of any defects within 3 days of delivery, pick up, or installtion. After 3rd day, the customer is considered to have approved the merchandise,
within his or her satisfaction, thus waiving all claims against Terra Nova Windows Inc.
6. Deliveries: There will be a 10% surcharge for delivery if an order is less than $1,000.00 within 30 miles.
6. Entregas: Habra un 10% de recargo a entregas que son menos de $1,000.00 y dentro de 30 millas.
4. Codigos de Inspección: Por favor verifique codigos de inspección de su ciudad antes de realizar una orden con Terra Nova Windows Inc. Nosotros no nos hacemos
responsables de los requisitos de codigo especificados por ciudad o estado.
5. Revisión de Ventanas: Los clientes son responsables de inspecciónar sus productos de cualquier defecto visual en el momento del recojo o entrega. El cliente
tiene hasta 3 dias desde la entrega, recojo, o instalación para informar a Terra Nova Windows Inc de cualquier defecto. Despues del tercer dia, el producto es considerado
aprovado y dentro de la satisfacción del cliente, con lo cual renuncia todo reclamo contra Terra Nova Windows Inc.
cost to be paid same day installation is completed. NO refunds for orders confirmed and payed.
2. Payment Terms: For all orders, there is a required 50% deposit from the total amount. Balance to be paid in full at the time of pickup/ delivery, or installation
3. Order Specification: Clients are responsible to confirm that all the information on the order is correct, including glass type, framing, grid style and pattern.
6164 River Crest Dr.
Riverside, CA 92507
Mr. Gustavo Gonzalez
Senior Planner
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, Ca. 92805
Mr. Gonzalez,
The Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim approved a permit for the demolition of a motel and
the construction of a car washing facility at 926 S. Beach Boulevard in July 2016. The Planning
Commission added Condition 43 as a “Good Neighbor Policy” requiring the replacement of 14 windows
along the southern side of the adjacent hotel. The purpose of this communication is to request that
Condition 43 be deleted as the hotel owner has been uncooperative, combative and exceptionally
greedy as the car wash owners attempted to comply with Condition 43. In addition, any additional
potential noise from the car wash had already been addressed in the construction process such that
new windows were unnecessary. Your consideration in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Robert M. McElroy
Anaheim Express Car Wash
ATTACHMENT NO. 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 10
SITE PHOTOS
Figure 1: Looking north from Ball Road
Figure 2: Looking north from Ball Road
ATTACHMENT NO. 11
Figure 3: Looking north at Ball Road entrance
Figure 4: Carwash tunnel exit and block wall with Plexiglas noise barrier
Figure 5: Carwash tunnel exit and block wall with Plexiglas noise barrier
Figure 6: Carwash Tunnel Exit
1
Gustavo Gonzalez
From:Jeremy Levine <jslland@aol.com>
Sent:Wednesday, August 01, 2018 4:51 PM
To:Gustavo Gonzalez; Lisandro Orozco; David Belmer; Bob McElroy Car Wash Partner;
Leonie Mulvihill
Subject:Fwd: Anaheim Express Wash (AEW1801) - Noise Level Measurement Results
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jason Lui <Jason.Lui@lsa.net>
Date: August 1, 2018 at 3:57:40 PM PDT
To: "Jeremy Levine (jslland@aol.com)" <jslland@aol.com>
Cc: "Bob McElroy Car Wash Partner (robertmmcelroy@gmail.com)" <robertmmcelroy@gmail.com>,
Amy Fischer <Amy.Fischer@lsa.net>, JT Stephens <JT.Stephens@lsa.net>, Daniel Kaufman
<Daniel.Kaufman@lsa.net>
Subject: Anaheim Express Wash (AEW1801) ‐ Noise Level Measurement Results
Hi Jeremy,
Below are the results of the noise levels measurements.
LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) conducted noise measurements on August 1, 2018 at The Travel Inn Motel
(920 South Beach Boulevard) in the City of Anaheim. Noise level measurements were conducted
subsequent to the April 2016 Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis and June 2016 Car Wash Dryer Noise
Mitigation at Anaheim Express Wash Memorandum for the Anaheim Express Wash Project prepared by
LSA.
Noise level measurements were conducted near the northern property line of the Anaheim Express Car
Wash between the motel units and the 15 ft high wall. A Larson Davis Model 831 ⅓ octave integraƟng
sound level meter (ANSI Type 1), set to A‐weighting and slow response, was used to conduct the noise
level measurements. Noise level measurements included the ambient noise with and without the car
wash in operation. Ambient noise sources include traffic noise on Beach Boulevard and Ball Road as well
as window air‐conditioners from the first and second floor motel units. The noise levels from the car
wash alone were calculated by subtracting the measured sound energy of the ambient noise level
without the car wash in operation from the measured sound energy of the ambient noise level with the
car wash in operation.
The table below provides the results of noise level measurements. As shown in the table, the average
ambient noise level without the car wash was 64.3 dBA Leq and the average ambient noise level with the
car wash was 66.8 dBA Leq. The calculated car wash noise level is 63.2 dBA Leq, which is lower than the
ambient noise level of 64.3 dBA Leq. In addition, the increase in ambient noise levels with the car wash in
operation would be 2.5 dBA. This noise increase is less than the 3 dBA threshold of perceptibility and the
increase in ambient noise level would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment.
Noise Level Measurement Results
ATTACHMENT NO. 12
2
Ambient Noise Level
without Car Wash Location Start Time
Duration
(Minutes)
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
1 A few feet west of gap between wall and car
wash 10:26 AM 2:17 59.1
2 Near gap between wall and car wash 10:43 AM 1:48 64.5
3 Near gap between wall and car wash 10:45 AM 3:14 66.3
4 Approximately 80 ft east of Beach Blvd 11:17 AM 1:01 63.1
5 Approximately 80 ft east of Beach Blvd 11:21 AM 2:00 64.1
6 A few feet west of gap between wall and car
wash 11:56 AM 2:26 65.8
Average Noise Level 64.3
Ambient Noise Level
with Car Wash Location Start Time
Duration
(Minutes)
Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
1 A few feet west of gap between wall and car
wash 10:16 AM 4:16 67.3
2 Near gap between wall and car wash 10:29 AM 11:23 66.8
3 10‐15 feet west of gap between wall and car
wash 11:09 AM 2:56 65.1
4 A few feet west of gap between wall and car
wash 11:36 AM 15:02 67.6
Average Noise Level 66.8
Car Wash Only Noise Level 63.2
Increase in Ambient Noise Level (dBA)2.5
Jason Lui | Senior Noise Specialist
LSA | 20 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
– – – – – – – – – – –
949-553-0666 Tel
Website
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.