RES-1989-365
RESOLUTION NO. 89R-_~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR CLASSIFICATIONS
DESIGNATED AS SUPERVISORY
WHEREAS. the need exists to establish rates of compen-
sation for cer.tain Supervisory classifications; and
WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Anaheim does
find that establishing rates of compensation for these
Supervisory classifications is in the best interests of the City
of Anaheim.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim as follows:
Section 1.
Classifications listed in Section 2 of this resolution
s ha 11 be allocated to ranges providing annual compensation
according to the salary structure listed below:
r
RANGE MINIMUM MIDPOINT CONTROL
CROO $ 22.779 $ 28.474 $ 31.321
CR01 23.918 29.898 32.888
CR02 25.114 31.393 34.532
CR03 26.370 32.963 36.259
CR04 27.689 34.611 38.072
CR05 29.074 36.342 39.976
CR06 30.527 38.159 41.975
CR07 32.054 40.067 44.074
CR08 33.656 42.070 46.277 \~ ,)II. .',
CR09 35.339 44. 174 48.591
CR10 37.106 46.383 51.021
CR11 38.962 48.702 53.572
CR12 40.910 51.137 56.251
CR13 42.955 53.694 59.063
CR14 45.103 56.379 62.017
CR15 47.358 59.198 65.118
CR16 49.726 62.158 68.374
CR17 52.213 65.266 71.793
CR18 54.823 68.529 75.382
CR19 57.564 71.955 79.151
CR20 60.442 75.553 83.108
CR21 63.465 79.331 87.2'64
CR22 66.638 83.298 91.628
CR23 69.970 87.463 96.209
CR24 73.469 91.836 101.020
CR25 77.142 96.428 106.071
CR26 80.999 101.249 111.374
CR27 85.049 106.311 116.942
CR28 89.302 111.627 122.790
CR29 93.766 117.208 128.929
CR30 98.454 123.068 135.375
CR31 103.377 129.221 142.143
CR32 108.546 135.682 149.250
Section 2.
The basic compensation plan for all officers and
employees of the City of Anaheim designated as Supervisory who
are now employed or will in the future be employed in any of the
classifications listed below shall be allocated to the following
salary ranges effective September 29. 1989.
Classification
Assistant Parking Lot Manager
Box Officer Treasurer
Chief Utilities Systems Operator
Community Services Supervisor
Computer Operations Supervisor
Construction Inspection Supervisor
Convention Center Facility Services Supervisor
Crime Statistics Supervisor
Data Control Supervisor
Deputy Fire Marshal
Emergency Services Coordinator
Energy Services Manager
Engineering Contracts Administrator
Golf Course Superintendent
Housing Operations Coordinator
Housing Rehabilitation Coordinator
Job Training Program Supervisor
Planning Graphics Supervisor
Principal Accountant
Principal Civil Engineer
Principal Electrical Engineer
Principal Traffic Engineer
Principal Water Engineer
Public Utilities Communications Officer
Public Utilities Generation Supervisor
Public Utilities Inform~tion Services Supervisor
Recreation Supervisor
Senior Citizens Servioes Supervisor
Support Services Supervisor
Systems Project Manager
Section 3.
Salar~ Range
X CROB
X CR06
XU CR16
X CR06
XU CR07
XU CR11
XU CROB
X CR09
XU CR07
XF CR13
X CR12
X CR17
X CR15
XU CR10
X CROB
X CROB
X CROB
X CR10
X CR12
X CR15
X CR1B
X CR15
X CR15
X CR10 'l\\I ,1#" ..
XU CR16
X CR06
X CR06
X CR06
X CR06
X CR15
The following classifications are obsolete and shall be
deleted from the city's classification system:
Classification
Assistant Parking Lot Coordinator
Community Services Center Director
Senior Citizens Center Director
Salary Range
X SR03
X SR03
X SR03
Section 4.
Employees working in classifications listed in Section
2 of this resolution shall receive a supervisory package of
eight percent (8%). The employee shall have the choice of
receiving the supervisory package in City-paid contribution to
the Public Employees Retirement System. or the equivalent amount
in deferred compensation or additional earnings.
Employees working part-time in classifications listed
in Section 2 of this Resolution shall receive ~ supervisory
package of one percent (1%) in additional earnings.
Section 5.
Employees in the classifications listed in Section 2 of
this resolution shall be covered by the following pay policies
effective September 29. 1989. To the extent that these policies
are inconsistent with any other City of Anaheim Personnel Rules.
the terms of these policies shall prevail. All reference to
salary adjustments contained in thisJsection shall be contingent
upon funding based upon annual discretionary budgetary
appropriations by the City Council.
5.1 Pax Plan Implementation/Structure Adjustment
A. Incumbents Below Range Minimum
An employee. whose current salary is
below the minimum of the range for
his/her job classification. will be
placed at the minimum rate of the range.
8. Incumbents Above Control Point
-~!i(\ ,;1, - "
An employee. whose current salary is
above the control point for the range of
their classification. shall not be
eligible for an increase until the
employee's salary is less than the
control point for the range.
5.2 Salary Structure AdJustment
At such time as the salary structure is adjusted.
incumbent employees shall be eligible to receive
up to the percent of the structure adjustment,
based upon satisfactory performance. not to exceed
control point.
If an incumbent employee's performance is less
than satisfactory, the Executive Manager may
extend the annual structure adjustment date up to
six (6) pay periods for reconsideration of the
salary increase. based upon satisfactory
performance. The review date may only be extended
once.
5.3 Merit Increases
Once each year~ in addition to the annual
structure adjustment~ an incumbent employee shall
be eligible to receive an increase between 0-5%
based upon satisfactory performance. Under no
circumstances shall this increase take the
employee beyond the control point for the range of
their position. Employees in classifications
listed in Section 2 of this resolution arc
eligible to receive a merit incr~ase calculated on
a prorated basis beginning after completion of
thirteen (13) complete biweekly pay periods in the
classification.
If an incumbent employee's performance is less
than satisfactory~ the Executive Manager may
extend the merit review date up to six (6) pay
periods for reconsideration of the merit increase~
based upon satisfactory performance. The merit
review date may only be extended once.
5.4 Non-Cumulative Merit Adjustment
As approved by City Council under separate
resolution~ an employee who reaches the control
point for his/her salary range shall be eligible
for a non-cumulative merit adjustment~ based upon
outstanding/superior performance. Specific elig-
ibility criteria and administrative policies shall
be provided under such separate resolution.
5.5 Hiring Pay Policy
I~ ~ ~
Newly hired employees shall be compensated at any
rate of the range up to the midpoint for their job
classification as authorized by the appointing
authority. When economic conditions~ unusual
employment conditions, or exceptional qualifi-
cations of a candidate for employment indicate a
higher rate would be in the City's best interests~
the City Manager may authorize hiring at a higher
rate in the range but this higher rate cannot
exceed the control point.
5.6 Promotion
An employee who is promoted to a job class listed
in this resolution shall be placed at the minimum
of the new range or at a salary in the range which
provides a 15% pay increase~ as long as it does
not exceed the control point.
5.7 Demotion
A. An employee rejected during the probationary
period shall be returned to the classification
in which they had regular status and to their
former salary level. unless the reasons for the
failure to complete probation would be cause
for dismissal from City service.
8. An employee. who takes a voluntary demotion to
their former job classificati~n shall be placed
at a rate which returns the employee to their
former salary status.
C. An employee. who takes a voluntary demotion to
any other job classification may be placed at a
rate which does not provide an increase in
salary. The rate of pay shall be determined by
the Executive Manager.
5.8 Probationary Employees
Employees ~n classifications listed in Section 2
of this resolution shall serve a probationary
period of twenty-six (26) complete biweekly pay
periods. A probationary employee will be eligible
to receive an increas~ between 0-5% upon
completion of thirteen (13) complete biweekly pay
periods. based upon satisfactory performance. A
probationary employee will be evaluated again.
based upon a performance evaluation. prior to
completion of the probationary period. but will
not be eligible for an additional increase. A
probationary employee will be eligible to receiv. ~,
the annual structure adjustment.
5.9 Reduction in Pay
An employee may receive a reduction in salary on
the basis of unsatisfactory work performance or
conduct.
5.11 Reclassification
A. An incumbent. who is reclassified with his/her
position to a job class at a higher range. will
be considered to be promoted and covered under
those provisions and may be eligible for a
salary increase of up to 5% at the end of
thirteen (13) complete biweekly pay periods.
based upon a satisfactory performance
evaluation.
8. An incumbentr who is reclassified with his/her
position to a job class with no change in
ranger will retain their rate of pay.
C. An incumbent. who is reclassified with his/her
position to a job class at a lower range. shall
retain their rate of pay in the new range. If
the current rate is higher than the new range
control point. the employee shall remain there
until such time as the rate i~ less than the
control point of the range for the position.
5.12 Provisional Appointments
Employees provisionally appointed to supervisory
job classes shall be eligible to serve in this
capacity no longer than thirteen (13) complete
biweekly pay periods. For purposes of computing
the appropriate pay rate they shall be considered
promoted.
5.13 Upgrade
Employees temporarily upgraded to a managementr
supervisory or professional job classification
shall receive a 5% increaser not to exceed control
pointr or the minimum rate of the salary ranger in
accordance with current upgrade provisions.
5.14 Payment of Premium Pay Under Certain Conditions
Managementr supervisory and professional employees
may be compensated for overtime work authorized .y ~
the appropriate executive manager at the rate of
one-and-one-half times their regular hourly rate
of pay provided that such employees have been
assigned by the appropriat. executive manager to
perform work normally performed by emp~oyees in
non-exempt job classes.
S~ction 6.
Employees hired to work on a part-time basis in any of
the classifications listed in Section 2 of this Resolution will
be compensated at the rate of pay established for the full-time
classification in Section 2.
Section 7.
The letter "X" preceding a salary range number
indicates that employees working in that job class are exempt
from overtime provisions as provided in Personnel Rule 6.
Premium Pay. The letter "FUr or "un preceding a salary range
indicates that employees upgraded to that job class shall be
paid premium pay as provided in Personnel Rule 6. Premium Pay.
Section 8.
The regular hourly rate of pay for employees working in
job classes listed in this Resolution shall be computed as
provided in Personnel Rule 5. Hours of Work and Pay Day.
Section 9.
Employees required to speak. read and/or write in
Spanish or other languages as well as English ~s part of the
regular duties of their position will be compensated at the rate
of forty dollars ($40) per biweekly pay period in addition to
their regular pay.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the effective date of this
Resolution shall be September 29. 1989.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Counci 1 this 22nd day of August . 1989.
~~--
ATTEST:
....._~f.L21..~~ m............._._._...._.....
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
!\~ .> '.
$..r1.~Cil'YOFANAHEiM
931/VK
CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 89R-365 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 22nd day of August, 1989, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle, Pickler, Kaywood and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 89R-365 on the 23rd day of August, 1989.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 23rd day of August, 1989.
~~ 7(S:~
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 89R-365 duly passed and
adopted by the Anaheim City Council on August 22, 1989.
~AJLS'~
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM