The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 2018/10/15 City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, October 15, 2018 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairperson: Jess Carbajal • Chairperson Pro-Tempore: John Gillespie • Commissioners: John Armstrong, Bill Dalati, Kimberly Keys, Michelle Lieberman, Steve White • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, October 11, 2018, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 10-15-2018 Page 2 of 5 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 10-15-2018 Page 3 of 5 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05981 (DEV2018-00096) Location: 1910 and 1921 South Union Street Request: To permit a coordinated sign program in association with the Jefferson at Stadium Park Phases A & B apartment communities. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15311, Class 11 (Accessory Structures). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 (DEV2017-00094) Location: 3534 - 3538 West Savanna Street Request: To approve the following land use entitlements: (i) amend the General Plan land use designation from Low-Medium Density Residential to Mid Density Residential; (ii) a Zoning Reclassification from the RM-4 (Multiple-Family Residential) to the RM- 3.5 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone; (iii) a conditional use permit to permit the construction of 19 attached single-family residential units with modified development standards; and (iv) a tentative tract map to establish a 1-lot, 19-unit condominium subdivision. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act. Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net 10-15-2018 Page 4 of 5 ITEM NO. 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 (DEV2015-00121) Location: 201 East Broadway Request: To permit and retain an existing church, performing arts theater, restaurant with sales of beer and wine for on-site consumption, accessory retail store, and off-site parking (River Church). Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00155 (DEV2018-00103) Location: Citywide Request: A City-initiated amendment to Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to clarify location, permitting, and operational requirements for emergency shelters and provide regulatory relief in the event of a “Declaration of a shelter crisis” as defined by California Government Code Section 8698(d). Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15060(c)(2). Motion Project Planner: Susan Kim skim@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, October 29, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. 10-15-2018 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 1:00 p.m. October 10, 2018 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2018 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05981 LOCATION: 1910 and 1921 South Union Street (Jefferson Edge and Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park Apartment Communities) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Jefferson Stadium Park LLC, represented by Chris Livoni. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a coordinated sign program for the Jefferson Edge and Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park apartment communities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 11, Accessory Structures) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05981. BACKGROUND: In 2016, the City Council approved a Development Agreement for the Jefferson at Stadium Park project, which has been subsequently renamed “Jefferson at Platinum Park.” This project consists of 1,079 dwelling units, 14,600 square feet of commercial development, and a 1.1-acre public park, developed in three phases on an 11.32-acre property in the Platinum Triangle. The first two phases are currently under construction and consist of the 371-unit Jefferson Edge and 376-unit, Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park apartment communities. Jefferson Rise includes 12 live/work units. The subject conditional use permit pertains to these two apartment communities. The General Plan designates the entire Jefferson Platinum Park project site for Mixed Use Urban Core land uses. The property is within the “I” Industrial Zone and the “PTMU” Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone. Land uses surrounding the Jefferson Edge and Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park apartment communities include Lennar’s A-Town development site to the north across Gene Autry Way; industrial land uses to the west; the future park site, offices and apartments to the south; Phase III of the Jefferson at Stadium Park apartment project directly to the east; and, Angel Stadium further to the east across State College Boulevard. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05981 October 15, 2018 Page 2 of 5 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a coordinated sign program for the Jefferson Edge and Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park apartment communities. The proposed signs do not include business identification signs for the ground floor live/work units at Jefferson Rise. The applicant will submit signs for these businesses, once the applicant has identified tenants. Additionally, the applicant will submit signs for Phase III of the Jefferson at Platinum Park project with the construction of the third phase. As shown in the table below, and the following site plan, the applicant proposes a coordinated sign program. The signs for Jefferson Edge at Platinum Park would consist of a projecting wall sign for the Leasing Center and two building identification (ID) wall signs. The signs for Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park consist of a Building ID projecting wall sign and a Leasing Center wall sign. The following table and site plan identify the proposed sign types and locations. The complete sign program, including sign renderings, is included as Exhibit C to the Draft Resolution. SIGN TABLE Sign Description Location Type Height Width Area A EDGE Leasing Center Faces S. Union Street, Above Leasing Office, adjacent to guest parking area Wall (Projecting) 6.5 ft. 1.5 ft. 9.8 sq. ft. B EDGE Building ID Faces Gene Autry Way at corner of S. Union Street, East Elevation Wall 16 ft. 5 ft. 80 sq. ft. C EDGE Building ID Faces Gene Autry Way, East Elevation Wall 17 ft. 4 ft. 68 sq. ft. D RISE Building ID Faces Gene Autry Way, North Elevation Wall (Projecting) 21 ft. 5 ft. 105 sq. ft. E RISE Leasing Center Faces Gene Autry Way at corner of S. Union Street, North Elevation Wall 4.5 ft. 1.5 ft. 6.8 sq. ft. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05981 October 15, 2018 Page 3 of 5 SITE PLAN FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: The PTMU Overlay Zone requires applicants to submit a coordinated sign program to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of the first sign permit. Residential uses in the PTMU Overlay Zone are subject to the same sign code requirements as all other multiple-family residential zones. These requirements permit one sign per frontage. The wall signs cannot exceed a maximum sign area of 20 square feet. If the coordinated sign program meets these Code requirements, Staff can approve it administratively. However, in order to provide design flexibility within the Platinum Triangle, if a project cannot meet these requirements, the applicant may submit the coordinated sign program, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. In the case of the Jefferson Edge and Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park apartment communities, staff believes that providing design flexibility for the coordinated sign program would be appropriate due to the configuration of the buildings and project. The standard multi-family residential sign code requirements are not well suited to identify a large-scale development project with multiple buildings, located on separate parcels; and, therefore, necessitating a more comprehensive sign program to distinguish the community. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05981 October 15, 2018 Page 4 of 5 Before the Planning Commission may approve the conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which the Code authorizes a conditional use permit; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. In addition, the Planning Commission must also make the following findings specific to approval of a coordinated sign program: 1) Signs shall complement the architecture of the buildings on the same property and provide a unifying element along the streetscape; and 2) The size, scale and style of signs shall be internally consistent and consistent with the scale of the buildings located on the same property and the surrounding land uses. The proposed coordinated sign program for Jefferson Edge and Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park apartment communities is consistent with and complementary to the apartment communities’ size, massing and overall aesthetics. The applicant has submitted signs designed with high quality materials, a contemporary style and complementary exterior colors and finishes. The applicant has submitted sign sizes consistent with the scale of the buildings. The signs would provide a unifying and identifying element along the streetscape. The proposed signs are on private property and any illumination of the signs would not spill over the property lines. As a result, the signs would not adversely affect any adjoining land uses or future growth and development in the area. Additionally, the signs would serve as the necessary means of identification for visitors, deliveries, and emergency vehicles to the 371-unit Jefferson Edge and 376-unit Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park apartment complexes. Overall, the implementation of a coordinated sign program would provide project identification, improved visibility and cohesive design elements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05981 October 15, 2018 Page 5 of 5 Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within the Class 11, Accessory Structures, Categorical Exemption. Class 11 consists of construction or placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including on-premises signs. Although the proposed coordinated sign program is for a residential development, staff believes that the impacts of the sign program, within the PTMU Overlay Zone, would be the same as those for other signs that fall within the Class 11 Categorical Exemption. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: The applicant has proposed signs that are tasteful, complement the Jefferson Edge and Jefferson Rise at Platinum Park apartment communities’ design and architecture, and consistent with the scale of the surrounding buildings. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor Susan Kim Associate Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Development Summary I (PTMU)DEV2018-00096Gene Autry Sub-Area BJEFFERSON STADIUM PARK I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area AVACANT I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area AVACANT I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area CINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area CSOUTHERN CALIFORNIAGAS COMPANYOFFICES I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area BJEFFERSON STADIUM PARK I (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area AANAVIA APARTMENTS O-L (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area AOFFICES O-L (PTMU)GatewaySub-Area AOFFICES O-L (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area AOFFICES O-L (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area AOFFICESO-L (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area AOFFICES I (PTMU)OfficeOFFICES I (PTMU)OfficeOFFICES I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIALI (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL O-L (PTMU)OfficeVACANT E GENE AUTRY WAY S U N I O N S T E ARTISAN CT S SANTA CRUZ ST GENE AUTRY WAY S U N I O N S T G E N E A U T R Y W A Y S J A C A R A N D A S T E. KATELLA AVE E. CERRITOS AVE S . H A S T E R S T E. CHAPMAN AVE S . L E W I S S T S . S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D S .D O U G L A S S R D W. DISNEY WAY 1 9 1 0 a n d 1 9 2 1 So u t h Un i o n St re e t D E V N o . 2 0 1 8 -0 0 09 6 Subject Property APN: 083-293-01083-293-02083-293-04 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Pho to:May 20 16 E GENE AUTRY WAY S U N I O N S T E ARTISAN CT S SANTA CRUZ ST GENE AUTRY WAY S U N I O N S T G E N E A U T R Y W A Y S J A C A R A N D A S T E. KATELLA AVE E. CERRITOS AVE S . H A S T E R S T E. CHAPMAN AVE S . L E W I S S T S . S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D S .D O U G L A S S R D W. DISNEY WAY 1 9 1 0 a n d 1 9 2 1 So u t h Un i o n St re e t D E V N o . 2 0 1 8 -0 0 09 6 Subject Property APN: 083-293-01083-293-02083-293-04 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Pho to:May 20 16 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2018-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05981 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2018-00096) (1910 & 1921 SOUTH UNION STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05981to conditionally permit a coordinated sign program in association with the Jefferson Rise and Jefferson Edge at Platinum Park apartment communities at 1910 & 1921 South Union Street in the City of Anaheim (the Property"). The Property is generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 11.32-acres, with two phases under construction of a new three-phase residential mixed use apartment community. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Mixed Use land uses. The Property is located in the “I” Industrial Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone and the property owner has the option to develop the property in accordance with either the “I” Industrial Zone or the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone; and WHEREAS, the Property has been developed in accordance with the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"). Subsection .010 of Section 18.20.150 (Signs) of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Code requires that a "coordinated sign program" be submitted to the Planning Department and must address the following: (1) Signs shall complement the architecture of the building and provide a unifying element along the streetscape; (2) The size, scale, and style of signs shall be internally consistent, and consistent with the scale of the buildings of which they are a part; (3) Wall signs for ground floor uses shall be placed between the doorway and the upper façade, and shall be located at approximately the same height as all other ground floor wall signs to create a unifying, horizontal pattern. WHEREAS, signs for residential uses developed in accordance with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone shall also be subject to the requirements of Section 18.44.070 (Signs in Residential Zones) of Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the Code; and if said signs do not conform to these requirements, per Section 18.44.055 (Coordinated Sign Program) of Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the Code, the coordinated sign program shall be subject to the approval of a conditional use - 2 - PC2018-*** permit and the required findings in 18.66.060 (Findings) of Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Code and the additional findings listed above; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 15, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 11 – Accessory Structures) which consists of the "construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities. Section 15311 of the CEQA Guidelines provides examples of projects that qualify for an exemption from the provisions of CEQA. The example that is applicable to the Proposed Project is for on-premise signs. The Proposed Project fits within that example and, pursuant to Section 15311 of the CEQA Guidelines, will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05981, does find and determine the following facts in support of the proposed coordinated sign program: 1) That the signs complement the architecture of the buildings on the same property and provide a unifying element along the streetscape. 2) The size, scale and style of signs are internally consistent, and consistent with the scale of the buildings located on the same property and the surrounding land uses. 3) There will not be any signs for ground floor uses as the project includes only residential uses. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05981, does find and determine the following facts: - 3 - PC2018-*** 1. The proposed request to permit a coordinated sign program at the premises is subject to a conditional use permit authorized under Section No. 18.44.055.040 of Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the Code. 2. The proposed conditional use permit, as conditioned herein, would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the signs will be of quality design that is internally consistent and complements the architecture of the buildings within the apartment community; 3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because the proposed signs will be internally consistent and located out of any line-of-sight areas. 4. The traffic generated by the proposed project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area there will be no traffic generated by this use. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval for the use and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim. and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05981, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05981in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. - 4 - PC2018-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2018-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on October 15, 2018, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of October, 2018. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2018-*** - 7 - PC2018-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05981 (DEV2018-00096) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SIGN PERMITS 1 Any future signage for the apartment community shall be in substantial conformance with the coordinated sign program. All new signs must be reviewed and approved by Planning Department staff. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 2 Any future signage for the apartment community that does not comply with the Code may be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director, provided that the signs are in substantial conformance with the coordinated sign program. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 3 No sign shall be permitted within the line-of-sight triangle. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 4 No sign shall be permitted within the public right-of-way. Public Works Department, Development Services GENERAL CONDITIONS 5 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 6 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 8 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. 7 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 9 - PC2018-*** EXHIBIT “C” COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05925 (DEV2017-00061) Ea s t E l e v a t i o n V i e w - U n i o n S t r e e t Sc a l e : 1 / 6 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” We s t E l e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 6 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” This rendering and design is the property of CA Signs and its use is restricted to the original project for which it was prepared. Any reproduction, publication or reuse by any method, in whole or in part, by others is prohibited without the written consent of CA Signs and is a violation of the law and is subject to legal recourse.Important note regarding digital colors shown: The colors represented on the layouts/drawings are only representations For actual samples of any displayed color or combination thereof, please contact your sales representative.Drawn by: Kat Date: 07/10/18Project: JPI Revision D a t e : 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 8 Ref: Jefferson Park - Edge ConceptsDate:By:Client Approval: as submitted as noted resubmit 10280 Glenoaks Boulevard Pacoima, CA 91331-1604 Telephone: 818•899•1888 www.casigns.com Layout A Si g n T y p e : A Si g n T y p e : B Si g n T y p e : C 2 No r t h E l e v a t i o n V i e w - G e n e A u t r y W a y Sc a l e : 1 / 6 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” So u t h E l e v a t i o n V i e w - A r t i s a n W a y Sc a l e : 1 / 6 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” EX H I B I T " C " A L E A S I N G B L A D E X 1 L E A S I N G B L A D E X 1 B W A L L I D S I G N X 1 W A L L I D S I G N X 1 C W A L L I D S I G N X 1 W A L L I D S I G N X 1 This rendering and design is the property of CA Signs and its use is restricted to the original project for which it was prepared. Any reproduction, publication or reuse by any method, in whole or in part, by others is prohibited without the written consent of CA Signs and is a violation of the law and is subject to legal recourse.Important note regarding digital colors shown: The colors represented on the layouts/drawings are only representations For actual samples of any displayed color or combination thereof, please contact your sales representative.Drawn by: Kat Date: 07/16/18Project: JPI Revision D a t e : Ref: Jefferson Park - Edge ConceptsDate:By:Client Approval: as submitted as noted resubmit 10280 Glenoaks Boulevard Pacoima, CA 91331-1604 Telephone: 818•899•1888 www.casigns.com Layout A.1 To p V i e w - L o c a t i o n s Si d e V i e w Si g n T y p e : A Sc a l e : 1 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 1’ - 6 ” 6 ’ - 6 ” 1’ - 1 6 ” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , pa i n t e d M P 5 9 6 4 7 B l a c k . 1/ 2 ” t h i c k p u s h - t h r o u g h i l l u m i n a t e d l e t t e r s . Co p y o n b o t h s i d e s o f b l a d e . as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout B Date: 07/10/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 0 7 / 2 5 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . El e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 4” t u b i n g & m o u n t i n g p l a t e Fr o n t V i e w ( f a c i n g s t r e e t ) Sc a l e : 1 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 1’ - 6 ” 2A as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout C Date: 07/10/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w Si g n T y p e : B Sc a l e : 1 / 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 5’ - 0 ” 1 6 ’ - 0 ” 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , pa i n t e d M P 5 9 6 4 7 B l a c k . 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d , ha l o - i l l u m i n a t e d l o g o . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e El e v a t i o n V i e w - E a s t Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 2 1/ 2 ” t h i c k p u s h - t h r o u g h i l l u m i n a t e d l e t t e r s . Co p y o n b o t h s i d e s o f b l a d e . B as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout D Date: 07/10/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . 3 Fr o n t V i e w Si g n T y p e : C Sc a l e : 1 / 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 4’ - 0 ” 1 7 ’ - 0 ” El e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , pa i n t e d M P 5 9 6 4 7 B l a c k . 4” d e e p c h a n n e l l o g o . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e 4” d e e p c h a n n e l l e t t e r s . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e c Fr o n t V i e w - S i g n T y p e A - I l l u m i n a t e d l e a s i n g s i g n On U n i o n S t r e e t Sc a l e : N T S as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Ex t e r i o r R e n d e r i n g s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout A Date: 08/02/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w - S i g n T y p e B - I l l u m i n a t e d w a l l m o u n t e d s i g n On c o r n e r o f U n i o n S t r e e t & G e n e A u t r y W a y Sc a l e : N T S as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Ex t e r i o r R e n d e r i n g s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout B Date: 08/02/18 Drawn by: Kat 2 Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w - S i g n T y p e C - I l l u m i n a t e d w a l l m o u n t e d s i g n On c o r n e r o f G e n e A u t r y W a y Sc a l e : N T S as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Ex t e r i o r R e n d e r i n g s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout C Date: 08/02/18 Drawn by: Kat 2 Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . No r t h E l e v a t i o n V i e w - G e n e A u t r y W a y Sc a l e : 1 / 3 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” Si g n T y p e : D as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - R i s e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout A Date: 07/10/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 4 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Ea s t E l e v a t i o n V i e w - P r i v a t e S t r e e t Sc a l e : 1 / 3 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” Si g n T y p e : E 2 So u t h E l e v a t i o n V i e w - A r t i s a n W a y Sc a l e : 1 / 3 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - R i s e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout A.1 Date: 07/16/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . We s t E l e v a t i o n V i e w - U n i o n S t r e e t Sc a l e : 1 / 3 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” D L E A S I N G B L A D E X 1 M A I N I D B L A D E X 1 This rendering and design is the property of CA Signs and its use is restricted to the original project for which it was prepared. Any reproduction, publication or reuse by any method, in whole or in part, by others is prohibited without the written consent of CA Signs and is a violation of the law and is subject to legal recourse.Important note regarding digital colors shown: The colors represented on the layouts/drawings are only representations For actual samples of any displayed color or combination thereof, please contact your sales representative.Drawn by: Kat Date: 07/16/18Project: JPI Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 4 / 1 8 Ref: Jefferson Park - Rise ConceptsDate:By:Client Approval: as submitted as noted resubmit 10280 Glenoaks Boulevard Pacoima, CA 91331-1604 Telephone: 818•899•1888 www.casigns.com Layout A.2 E LE A S I N G S I G N 2 5’ - 0 ” 2 1 ’ - 0 ” 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d SW 7 0 4 7 - P o r p o i s e 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d , ha l o - i l l u m i n a t e d l o g o . Lo g o o n b o t h s i d e s o f b l a d e . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e Fr o n t V i e w Si g n T y p e : D Sc a l e : 3 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” El e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” This rendering and design is the property of CA Signs and its use is restricted to the original project for which it was prepared. Any reproduction, publication or reuse by any method, in whole or in part, by others is prohibited without the written consent of CA Signs and is a violation of the law and is subject to legal recourse.Important note regarding digital colors shown: The colors represented on the layouts/drawings are only representations For actual samples of any displayed color or combination thereof, please contact your sales representative.Drawn by: Kat Date: 07/10/18Project: JPI Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 4 / 1 8 Ref: Jefferson Park - Rise ConceptsDate:By:Client Approval: as submitted as noted resubmit 10280 Glenoaks Boulevard Pacoima, CA 91331-1604 Telephone: 818•899•1888 www.casigns.com Layout B 4” t u b i n g & m o u n t i n g p l a t e 1/ 2 ” t h i c k t r a n s l u s c e n t w h i t e pu s h - t h r o u g h i l l u m i n a t e d l e t t e r s . 3D as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - R i s e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout C Date: 07/19/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 3 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w Si g n T y p e : E Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ” El e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 1’ - 6 ” 4 ’ - 6 ” 2” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d SW 7 0 4 7 - P o r p o i s e 1/ 4 ” t h i c k w a t e r j e t c u t a l u m i n u m l e t t e r s . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e 4 3 / 1 6 ” 4 4” E as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - R i s e Ex t e r i o r R e n d e r i n g s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout D Date: 08/02/18 Drawn by: Kat 4 Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 4 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w On c o r n e r o f G e n e A u t r y W a y & U n i o n S t r e e t Sc a l e : N T S Si g n T y p e D Il l u m i n a t e d b l a d e s i g n Si g n T y p e E No n - i l l u m i n a t e d l e a s i n g s i g n and E DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY PROPOSED COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM Development Standard Residential Sign Standards Maximum Number of Signs per Frontage 1 sign per frontage (2 signs are permitted per frontage if the signs are proposed as entry monument wall signs on opposite sides of main driveway/pedestrian entrance) Maximum Area 20 square feet (sq. ft.) Sign Description Location Type Height Width A EDGE Leasing Center Faces S. Union Street, Above Leasing Office, adjacent to guest parking area Wall (Project ing) 6.5 ft. 1.5 ft. B EDGE Building ID Faces Gene Autry Way at corner of S. Union Street, East Elevation Wall 16 ft. 5 ft. C EDGE Building ID Faces Gene Autry Way, East Elevation Wall 17 ft. 4 ft. D RISE Building ID Faces Gene Autry Way, North Elevation Wall (Project ing) 21 ft. 5 ft. E RISE Leasing Center Faces Gene Autry Way at corner of S. Union Street, North Elevation Wall 4.5 ft. 1.5 ft. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 18.20.150 SIGNS. .010 Coordinated Program. A coordinated sign program is required to be submitted to the Planning Department, per the requirements of subsection 18.44.050 (Coordinated Sign Program), prior to the issuance of the first sign permit and shall address the following: .0101 Signs shall complement the architecture of the building and provide a unifying element along the streetscape. .0102 The size, scale, and style of signs shall be internally consistent, and consistent with the scale of the buildings of which they are a part. .0103 Wall signs for ground floor uses shall be placed between the doorway and the upper facade, and shall be located at approximately the same height as all other ground floor wall signs to create a unifying, horizontal pattern. .020 Applicability of Other Regulations. The provisions in Chapter 18.44 (Signs) shall apply to projects within the PTMU Overlay Zone except as listed below. Residential uses shall be subject to the requirements of Section 18.44.070 (Signs in Residential Zones). .0201 Awning signs and projecting signs are permitted for buildings with ground floor commercial uses. .0202 Thematic elements, three-dimensional objects or non-habitable structures, such as a gateway, tower, sculpture, spire and similar architectural features to entertain pedestrians, are permitted. 18.44.055 COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM. .010 A coordinated sign program shall be submitted to the Planning Department in connection with the following projects: .0101 A multiple-occupancy site consisting of two (2) or more tenant spaces; .0102 Any separately identifiable building group; .0103 A neighborhood or community shopping center; .0104 Any other site containing at least forty thousand (40,000) square feet of land area; and .0105 Any project for which a coordinated sign program is specifically required by the provisions of the applicable zone, or conditions of approval of a zoning entitlement. .020 The Planning Director shall approve the coordinated sign program if all signs within the coordinated sign program comply with the provisions of this chapter, if any of the signs proposed require approval of a conditional use permit, the entire coordinated sign program shall be submitted as conditional use permit. .030 For a site on which a more restrictive sign program has been adopted, the provisions contained in the coordinated sign program shall take precedence over the signage requirements of the applicable zone. .040 In addition to the provisions contained above, the following shall also apply to the area described as the Platinum Triangle, as described in the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan: .0401 If any of the signs in the proposed coordinated sign program do not comply with the requirements of this chapter, said coordinated sign program shall be subject to the approval of a conditional use permit and the required findings in 18.66.060 and the following additional findings: .01 Signs shall complement the architecture of the buildings on the same property and provide a unifying element along the streetscape; and .02 The size, scale and style of signs shall be internally consistent and consistent with the scale of the buildings located on the same property and the surrounding land uses. (Ord. 6351 § 23; December 15, 2015.) 18.44.070 SIGNS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES. No sign shall be erected, installed or maintained in any residential zone, except as permitted in this section. .010 Identification Signs. Within multiple-family residential zones, one lighted or unlighted, double-faced identification sign of a maximum of twenty (20) square feet in area, identifying any on-site use(s) permitted in the zone in which the property is located is allowed. When frontage on more than one street exists, one (1) such sign may be permitted on each additional street frontage. Such signage may be placed on the building below the roof level or on a monument type sign, not exceeding four (4) feet in height and not closer than seven (7) feet to any public right-of-way. The maximum number of signs per street frontage may be increased to two (2), provided such signs are incorporated into entry monument walls placed on opposite sides of a main driveway or pedestrian entrance. Information directing interested people to a leasing office may be incorporated into the identification sign, provided that such information shall not exceed one-third (1/3) of the sign face. .020 Other Signs. Directional signs and nameplates are allowed pursuant to Section 18.44.110, public utility signs and other signs are required by law pursuant to Section 18.44.140, political signs are allowed pursuant to Section 18.44.210, and other temporary signs are allowed pursuant to other sections of this chapter. .030 Noncommercial Messages. This chapter does not prohibit the display of a noncommercial message on a temporary sign that has a sign area of less than twenty (20) square feet. (Ord. 5920 § 1 (part); June 8, 2004: Ord. 6031 § 39; August 22, 2006.) Ea s t E l e v a t i o n V i e w - U n i o n S t r e e t Sc a l e : 1 / 6 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” We s t E l e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 6 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” This rendering and design is the property of CA Signs and its use is restricted to the original project for which it was prepared. Any reproduction, publication or reuse by any method, in whole or in part, by others is prohibited without the written consent of CA Signs and is a violation of the law and is subject to legal recourse.Important note regarding digital colors shown: The colors represented on the layouts/drawings are only representations For actual samples of any displayed color or combination thereof, please contact your sales representative.Drawn by: Kat Date: 07/10/18Project: JPI Revision D a t e : 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 8 Ref: Jefferson Park - Edge ConceptsDate:By:Client Approval: as submitted as noted resubmit 10280 Glenoaks Boulevard Pacoima, CA 91331-1604 Telephone: 818•899•1888 www.casigns.com Layout A Si g n T y p e : A Si g n T y p e : B Si g n T y p e : C 2 No r t h E l e v a t i o n V i e w - G e n e A u t r y W a y Sc a l e : 1 / 6 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” So u t h E l e v a t i o n V i e w - A r t i s a n W a y Sc a l e : 1 / 6 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” EX H I B I T " C " AT T A C H M E N T N O . 3 A L E A S I N G B L A D E X 1 L E A S I N G B L A D E X 1 B W A L L I D S I G N X 1 W A L L I D S I G N X 1 C W A L L I D S I G N X 1 W A L L I D S I G N X 1 This rendering and design is the property of CA Signs and its use is restricted to the original project for which it was prepared. Any reproduction, publication or reuse by any method, in whole or in part, by others is prohibited without the written consent of CA Signs and is a violation of the law and is subject to legal recourse.Important note regarding digital colors shown: The colors represented on the layouts/drawings are only representations For actual samples of any displayed color or combination thereof, please contact your sales representative.Drawn by: Kat Date: 07/16/18Project: JPI Revision D a t e : Ref: Jefferson Park - Edge ConceptsDate:By:Client Approval: as submitted as noted resubmit 10280 Glenoaks Boulevard Pacoima, CA 91331-1604 Telephone: 818•899•1888 www.casigns.com Layout A.1 To p V i e w - L o c a t i o n s Si d e V i e w Si g n T y p e : A Sc a l e : 1 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 1’ - 6 ” 6 ’ - 6 ” 1’ - 1 6 ” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , pa i n t e d M P 5 9 6 4 7 B l a c k . 1/ 2 ” t h i c k p u s h - t h r o u g h i l l u m i n a t e d l e t t e r s . Co p y o n b o t h s i d e s o f b l a d e . as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout B Date: 07/10/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 0 7 / 2 5 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . El e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 4” t u b i n g & m o u n t i n g p l a t e Fr o n t V i e w ( f a c i n g s t r e e t ) Sc a l e : 1 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 1’ - 6 ” 2A as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout C Date: 07/10/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w Si g n T y p e : B Sc a l e : 1 / 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 5’ - 0 ” 1 6 ’ - 0 ” 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , pa i n t e d M P 5 9 6 4 7 B l a c k . 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d , ha l o - i l l u m i n a t e d l o g o . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e El e v a t i o n V i e w - E a s t Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 2 1/ 2 ” t h i c k p u s h - t h r o u g h i l l u m i n a t e d l e t t e r s . Co p y o n b o t h s i d e s o f b l a d e . B as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout D Date: 07/10/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . 3 Fr o n t V i e w Si g n T y p e : C Sc a l e : 1 / 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 4’ - 0 ” 1 7 ’ - 0 ” El e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , pa i n t e d M P 5 9 6 4 7 B l a c k . 4” d e e p c h a n n e l l o g o . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e 4” d e e p c h a n n e l l e t t e r s . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e c Fr o n t V i e w - S i g n T y p e A - I l l u m i n a t e d l e a s i n g s i g n On U n i o n S t r e e t Sc a l e : N T S as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Ex t e r i o r R e n d e r i n g s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout A Date: 08/02/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w - S i g n T y p e B - I l l u m i n a t e d w a l l m o u n t e d s i g n On c o r n e r o f U n i o n S t r e e t & G e n e A u t r y W a y Sc a l e : N T S as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Ex t e r i o r R e n d e r i n g s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout B Date: 08/02/18 Drawn by: Kat 2 Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w - S i g n T y p e C - I l l u m i n a t e d w a l l m o u n t e d s i g n On c o r n e r o f G e n e A u t r y W a y Sc a l e : N T S as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - E d g e Ex t e r i o r R e n d e r i n g s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout C Date: 08/02/18 Drawn by: Kat 2 Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . No r t h E l e v a t i o n V i e w - G e n e A u t r y W a y Sc a l e : 1 / 3 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” Si g n T y p e : D as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - R i s e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout A Date: 07/10/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 4 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Ea s t E l e v a t i o n V i e w - P r i v a t e S t r e e t Sc a l e : 1 / 3 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” Si g n T y p e : E 2 So u t h E l e v a t i o n V i e w - A r t i s a n W a y Sc a l e : 1 / 3 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - R i s e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout A.1 Date: 07/16/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . We s t E l e v a t i o n V i e w - U n i o n S t r e e t Sc a l e : 1 / 3 2 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” D L E A S I N G B L A D E X 1 M A I N I D B L A D E X 1 This rendering and design is the property of CA Signs and its use is restricted to the original project for which it was prepared. Any reproduction, publication or reuse by any method, in whole or in part, by others is prohibited without the written consent of CA Signs and is a violation of the law and is subject to legal recourse.Important note regarding digital colors shown: The colors represented on the layouts/drawings are only representations For actual samples of any displayed color or combination thereof, please contact your sales representative.Drawn by: Kat Date: 07/16/18Project: JPI Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 4 / 1 8 Ref: Jefferson Park - Rise ConceptsDate:By:Client Approval: as submitted as noted resubmit 10280 Glenoaks Boulevard Pacoima, CA 91331-1604 Telephone: 818•899•1888 www.casigns.com Layout A.2 E LE A S I N G S I G N 2 5’ - 0 ” 2 1 ’ - 0 ” 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d SW 7 0 4 7 - P o r p o i s e 4” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d , ha l o - i l l u m i n a t e d l o g o . Lo g o o n b o t h s i d e s o f b l a d e . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e Fr o n t V i e w Si g n T y p e : D Sc a l e : 3 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” El e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” This rendering and design is the property of CA Signs and its use is restricted to the original project for which it was prepared. Any reproduction, publication or reuse by any method, in whole or in part, by others is prohibited without the written consent of CA Signs and is a violation of the law and is subject to legal recourse.Important note regarding digital colors shown: The colors represented on the layouts/drawings are only representations For actual samples of any displayed color or combination thereof, please contact your sales representative.Drawn by: Kat Date: 07/10/18Project: JPI Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 4 / 1 8 Ref: Jefferson Park - Rise ConceptsDate:By:Client Approval: as submitted as noted resubmit 10280 Glenoaks Boulevard Pacoima, CA 91331-1604 Telephone: 818•899•1888 www.casigns.com Layout B 4” t u b i n g & m o u n t i n g p l a t e 1/ 2 ” t h i c k t r a n s l u s c e n t w h i t e pu s h - t h r o u g h i l l u m i n a t e d l e t t e r s . 3D as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - R i s e Co n c e p t s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout C Date: 07/19/18 Drawn by: Kat Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 3 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w Si g n T y p e : E Sc a l e : 1 / 8 ” = 1 ” El e v a t i o n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 / 4 ” = 1 ’ - 0 ” 1’ - 6 ” 4 ’ - 6 ” 2” d e e p f a b r i c a t e d c a b i n e t , fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d SW 7 0 4 7 - P o r p o i s e 1/ 4 ” t h i c k w a t e r j e t c u t a l u m i n u m l e t t e r s . Fa c e & r e t u r n s p a i n t e d MP 6 4 2 2 S P H i - H i d e W h i t e 4 3 / 1 6 ” 4 4” E as s u b m i t t e d By : Da t e : as n o t e d r e s u b m i t Cl i e n t A p p r o v a l : Pr o j e c t : J P I Re f : J e f f e r s o n P a r k - R i s e Ex t e r i o r R e n d e r i n g s 10 2 8 0 G l e n o a k s B o u l e v a r d Pa c o i m a , C A 9 1 3 3 1 - 1 6 0 4 Te l e p h o n e : 8 1 8 • 8 9 9 • 1 8 8 8 ww w . c a s i g n s . c o m Layout D Date: 08/02/18 Drawn by: Kat 4 Revision D a t e : 1 0 / 0 4 / 1 8 Th i s r e n d e r i n g a n d d e s i g n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f C A S i g n s a n d i t s u s e i s r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e o r i g i n a l p r o j e c t f o r w h i c h i t wa s p r e p a r e d . A n y r e p r o d u c t i o n , p u b l i c a t i o n o r r e u s e b y a n y m e t h o d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , b y o t h e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d wi t h o u t t h e w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C A S i g n s a n d i s a v i o l a t i o n o f t h e l a w a n d i s s u b j e c t t o l e g a l r e c o u r s e . Im p o r t a n t n o t e r e g a r d i n g d i g i t a l c o l o r s s h o w n : T h e c o l o r s r e p r e s e n t e d o n t h e l a y o u t s / d r a w i n g s a r e o n l y ti o n t h e r e o f , p l e a s e c o n t a c t y o u r s a l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e . Fr o n t V i e w On c o r n e r o f G e n e A u t r y W a y & U n i o n S t r e e t Sc a l e : N T S Si g n T y p e D Il l u m i n a t e d b l a d e s i g n Si g n T y p e E No n - i l l u m i n a t e d l e a s i n g s i g n and E 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2018 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 LOCATION: 3534-3538 West Savanna Street APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Chris Segesman with Bonanni Development and the property owner is the Ronald Lacher. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following zoning entitlements: 1) A General Plan Amendment to amend the land use designation from Low-Medium Density Residential to Mid Density Residential; 2) A Zoning Reclassification from the RM-4 (Multiple-Family Residential) to the RM-3.5 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone; 3) A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a 19-unit, attached single family residential project with modified development standards; 4) A Tentative Tract Map to permit a 1-lot, 19 unit subdivision for condominium purposes. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolutions, determining that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act, and approving General Plan Amendment No. 2017- 00518, Reclassification No. 2018-00314, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951, and Tentative Tract Map No. 18152. BACKGROUND: This 0.78-acre property consists of two parcels, is located in the “RM-4” Multiple Family Residential zone and is developed with two detached single- family homes. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 October 15, 2018 Page 2 of 8 The site is designated for Low-Medium Density Residential land uses by the General Plan. Surrounding uses include condominiums to the north across Savanna Street, apartments and duplexes to the west, apartments to the south, and condominiums to the east. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to demolish the two existing single family homes and construct 19 attached, single-family residences using the RM 3.5 zone development standards. The units would be in five, 3-story buildings with an approximate height of 37 feet. There would be a 3-plex building with front doors and patios fronting on Savanna Street east of the driveway, a 3- plex building to the south, and a duplex building south of that building, all oriented east-west. There would also be a 5-plex building west of the driveway with a north-south orientation, with garage doors fronting the main entry drive-aisle. A 6-plex building with an east-west orientation would be at the rear of the property. All units would have two bedrooms with 2.5 baths, and would contain 1,268 to 1,272 square feet of living area. Each unit would be three levels with garages and a den or office on the first level, a great room, kitchen, and half-bath on the second level, and two bedrooms with bathrooms on the third level. Each unit would have a two-car garage. A total of 38 garage spaces and seven open guest spaces are proposed, for a total of 45 on-site parking spaces; two more than the minimum number of Code required spaces. The applicant would be required to improve the right-of-way with an eight-foot parkway and a four-foot sidewalk. Six-foot high block walls would be constructed along the interior property lines adjacent to existing apartment and condominium complexes. Site Plan N GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 October 15, 2018 Page 3 of 8 As shown in the rendering below, the homes would have a Spanish-style architecture with stucco walls, a stone veneer band along the base of the buildings, tile roof, and balconies with wrought- iron railings. View from Savanna Street looking southwest A total of 5,931 square feet of recreational area is proposed; this area would include a children’s play area, barbeque and picnic table. Though some units have private patios, all Code compliant recreation-leisure area is provided entirely within the common areas. A detailed Development Summary is provided as Attachment No. 1 to this report. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Following is staff’s analysis and recommendation for each requested entitlement action: General Plan Amendment: The Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan is the guide for the City’s future development. It designates the distribution and location of specific land uses and addresses the permitted densities for each land use designation. The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment in order to redesignate the property from Low-Medium Density Residential to Mid Density Residential land uses. Before the Planning Commission may approve a General Plan Amendment, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The proposed amendment maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan; 2) The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; 3) The proposed amendment would maintain the balance of land uses within the City; and GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 October 15, 2018 Page 4 of 8 4) If the amendment is to the General Plan Land Use Map, the subject property is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. Staff believes that consideration of a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the site to a higher density residential land use is appropriate. The current Low-Medium Density Residential designation allows up to 18 dwelling units per acre. The project site is adjacent to properties with existing multiple-family land uses and includes a mix of Low-Medium and Medium Density Residential General Plan designations in the vicinity. Staff believes that the requested Mid Density Residential land use designation would be compatible with these surrounding residential designations. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested General Plan Amendment. The Land Use Element describes the Mid Density Residential designation as providing for the development of a quality multiple-family living environment with design amenities, such as private open space or recreation areas. The permitted density range is from zero to 27 dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed project would have a density of 24.3 dwelling units per acre. The proposed modification to the General Plan also supports the following General Plan policies intended to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs: o Goal 1.1: Preserve and enhance the quality and character of Anaheim’s mosaic of unique neighborhoods. o Goal 2.1: Continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. o Goal 4.1: Promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding land uses. o Goal 6.1: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in Anaheim through strategic infill development and revitalization of existing development. Reclassification: The two properties are zoned Multiple Family Residential “RM-4,” which is not consistent with the existing Low-Medium land use designation. Further, the project includes a General Plan Amendment to Mid Density Residential as described above, and the implementing zone would be Multiple-Family Residential “RM-3.5.” Accordingly, the applicant has proposed to reclassify the property and staff supports this request because the proposed RM-3.5 zone would comply with the proposed Mid Density Residential land use designation. Conditional Use Permit: With the proposed Reclassification, the project would be subject to the “RM-3.5” Multiple Family Residential zoning requirements. In this zone, development standards, including setback and building separation requirements, may be modified as part of a conditional use permit when it is determined that the modifications serve to achieve a high quality project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. Before the Planning Commission may approve the conditional use permit for a planned unit development, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 October 15, 2018 Page 5 of 8 1) The uses within the project are compatible; 2) New buildings or structures related to the project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area, provided the existing buildings conform with the provisions of this title; 3) Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate; 4) The project is consistent with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; 5) The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area; 6) The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; 7) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The project complies with all development standards of the RM-3.5 Zone with the exception of certain setback requirements. The applicant is requesting to modify the interior setback and setbacks between buildings. Setbacks for projects in the RM-3.5 Zone may be modified in conjunction with a conditional use permit when it is determined that the modifications promote increased pedestrian activity, provide for a unified street frontage, ensure privacy and light for residential uses, provide for public spaces, and promote compatibility with existing development. This proposed project includes modifications to the following development standards in the RM- 3.5 zoning district: Setback RM-3.5 Zone Standards Proposed Project Interior 20 feet 14- 24 feet Building to Building (3-story to 3-story) 25-40 feet 16 – 24 feet Interior Setback: The applicant is requesting a 14-foot building setback along the southern property line and a 15-foot setback along the western and eastern property lines, where a 20-foot setback is required for three story structures. The intent of the 20-foot setback along the interior property lines is to ensure that adequate separation and landscaping protects adjacent uses from the proposed use. Staff believes the request for the modification of the interior setback requirement is justified because the property abuts other multiple-family residential land uses. In addition, the new condominium buildings would be constructed adjacent to existing carports and driveways which exist on the west and south sides of the property. The project would meet or exceed the minimum landscape setback requirement in most areas, with the exception of the encroachment of a handicap parking space adjacent to the west property line, and would include a masonry wall to provide a buffer; therefore, sufficient separation between adjacent uses would still be met despite the reduced setbacks. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the requested interior setback modification request. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 October 15, 2018 Page 6 of 8 Building to Building Setback: The Zoning Code requires a 40-foot separation between three-story buildings with parallel walls that are designated as “primary” walls. Primary walls are building walls that contain an entrance and/or windows opening into living areas. The setbacks required between the buildings are intended to ensure privacy and light for residential uses, provide for public spaces, and promote compatibility with existing development. The proposed project would provide reduced building-to-building setbacks as shown in the table below. The three-story buildings separated by drive aisles would require a setback modification, but would have adequate separation to ensure a quality living environment. The units with main entries facing each other would feature a well-landscaped area and private porches, and would have an attractive landscaped paseo for access to the front doors. The elevations would be enhanced and articulated with quality design features; therefore, staff believes that the modified separations between buildings are justified because the proposed setbacks would allow for the efficient layout of buildings on the property while ensuring a quality living environment. Building to Building Setback Requirement (feet) Setback Proposed (feet) (*) Modification A to C 40 57 A to D 40 33* A to E 25 27 B to A 40 48 B to C 40 24* B to D 40 71 C to D 40 16* D to E 40 24 Tentative Tract Map: Before the Planning Commission may approve the tentative tract map, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed subdivision of the Property, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim, and more particularly with the "Mid Density Residential" land use designation proposed as part of General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518, now pending. 2) That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, including their design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning and development standards of the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential Zone proposed as part of Reclassification No. 2018-00314, now pending, with the exception of the reduced setbacks being proposed in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951. 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Proposed Project. 4) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 October 15, 2018 Page 7 of 8 5) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18152 or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. A tentative tract map is proposed to create a 1-lot condominium subdivision for the 19 “airspace” condominium units. All common areas, including driveways, recreational areas, paseos and sidewalks would be owned and maintained by the homeowner’s association. The proposed density of 24.3 dwelling units per acre is permitted under the Mid Density Residential land use designation which allows up to 27 dwelling units per acre. In addition, the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and will not conflict with easements acquired by the public. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the tentative tract map request. Correspondence Received: Staff received three letters of opposition from other residents in the neighborhood pertaining to the proposed project (see Attachment No. 15). The neighbors expressed concerns about adding more units in the neighborhood, safety issues in the street, and lack of parking in the neighborhood. Environmental Impact Analysis: An Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project and to identify necessary mitigation pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The IS/MND was circulated to public agencies and interested parties on September 20, 2018, for a 20-day comment period. No comment letters were received as a result of the public notification. Mitigation measures have been identified in the IS/MND and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 356, attached to this report. These mitigation measures are related to biological resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, tribal cultural resources, geology/soils, and noise. The mitigation measures are being recommended to the Planning Commission as conditions of approval in the attached draft resolution for the approval of the proposed project. With implementation of these measures, the IS/MND concluded that project impacts will be reduced to levels considered less than significant and there would be no remaining potentially significant adverse impacts related to the project. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 October 15, 2018 Page 8 of 8 CONCLUSION: Staff has carefully considered the proposed project and believes that it is designed in a manner that will provide a quality living environment for its future residents and is compatible with the surrounding land uses. In addition, the proposed project meets the goal to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. Staff recommends approval of the proposed request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor David See Associate Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Development Summary 2. Draft MND Resolution 3. Draft General Plan Amendment Resolution 4. Draft Reclassification Resolution 5. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 6. Draft Tentative Tract Map Resolution 7. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 8. Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 356 9. Letter of Request 10. General Plan Amendment Justification Letter 11. Conditional Use Permit Justification Letter 12. Project Plans 13. Tentative Tract Map 14. Renderings 15. Correspondence RM-4DEL AMOAPARTMENTS134 DU RM-4DEL AMOAPARTMENTS134 DU C-GSELF STORAGE FACILITY C-GRETAIL RM-3APARTMENTS8 DU RM-3WATER PUMP RM-4VILLA MIMOSAAPTS18 DU C-GNURSING HOMECARE FACILITY RM-4L'ABRI APTS18 DU RM-4LA COSTAAPTS30 DU RM-2CONDOMINIUMS/TOWNHOUSES RM-4SAVANNAVILLAAPARTMENTS28 DU C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL RM-2CONDOS10 DU RM-4DEV2017-00094SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE RM-3APTS8 DU RM-4SUMMERSET APARTMENTS20 DU O .C .F .C .D . RM-4APTS12 DU RM-4CASA PACIFICA APARTMENTS70 DU TVACANT O.C.F.C.D. RM-4VILLA SAVANNAAPARTMENTS86 DU RM-4VILLA SAVANNAAPARTMENTS86 DU R M -2 C O N D O M I N I U M S / T O W N H O U S E S RM-2TOWNHOMES RM-4CONDOMINIUMS/TOWNHOUSES RM-4SAVANNAAPTS18 DU RM-4VILLA REGINAAPTS22 DURM-2TOWN-HOMES RM-2TOWN-HOMES RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4FOURPLEX T S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E C-GRESTAURANT C-GMEDICAL OFFICE O-LCONVALE-SCENTHOSPITAL TMEDICAL OFFICES TSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-2TOWN-HOMES18 DU RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S - 2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RM-3Duplex RM-3DUPLEX RM-3DUPLEX RM-3DUPLEX RM-3DUPLEX S K N O T T A V E W SAVANNA ST S M A R I A N W A Y M O U N T W A T E R M A N D R W MARIAN WAY W ROME AVE S W. BALL RDS. K N O T T A V E W. ORANGE AVE . CERRITOS AVE S . B E A C H B L V D .BALL RD W. CERRITO S AVE S . B E A C H B L V D 3 5 3 4 -3 5 3 8 We s t S a va n n a S t r e e t D E V N o . 2 0 1 7 -0 0 09 4 Subject Property APN: 134-425-16134-425-17 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Pho to:May 20 16 B U E N A P A R K B U E N A P A R K S K N O T T A V E W SAVANNA ST S M A R I A N W A Y M O U N T W A T E R M A N D R W MARIAN WAY W ROME AVE S W S A V A N N A S T S A R C W A Y W. BALL RDS. K N O T T A V E W. ORANGE AVE . CERRITOS AVE S . B E A C H B L V D .BALL RD W. CERRITO S AVE S . B E A C H B L V D 3 5 3 4 -3 5 3 8 We s t S a va n n a S t r e e t D E V N o . 2 0 1 7 -0 0 09 4 Subject Property APN: 134-425-16134-425-17 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Pho to:May 20 16 B U E N A P A R K B U E N A P A R K ATTACHMENT NO. 1 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Development Standard Proposed Project RM-3.5 Standards Site Area 0.78 acres --- Density 24.3 du/ac 27 du/ac max. (based on proposed Mid Density Residential General Plan land use designation) Lot Area 33,841 square feet 30,400 square feet Lot Width 158 feet 70 feet Floor Area 2-bed: 1,268-1,272 sq. feet 2-bed: 825 sq. ft. minimum Lot Coverage 35% 50% maximum Front Landscape Setback 15’-2” to 16’-6” 15 feet Interior Setback 14’-0 ½” 15 feet* Building to Building setback 16’-1” varies* 25-40 feet (3-story)* Building Height 36’-7” feet, 3stories 40 feet, 3 stories Parking 45 spaces 43 spaces * May be modified by CUP [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 -1- RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017- 05951, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 (DEV2017-00094) (3534-3538 WEST SAVANNA STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518, Reclassification No. 2018-00314, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951, and Tentative Tract Map No. 18152 to demolish two existing single-family residences and construct 19 single-family attached residences with modified development standards (the " Proposed Project"), for that certain real property located at 3534-3538 West Savanna Street in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.78 acres in size and is currently developed with two single-family residences. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Low-Medium Density Residential land uses. The Property is located in the “RM- 4” Multiple-Family Residential Zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Project is to construct 19 single-family attached residences with modified development standards subject to approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951 by the Planning Commission pursuant to Sections 18.06.030 (Uses), of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple- Family Residential Zones) of the Code; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518 is to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from Low-Medium Density Residential to Mid Density Residential; and WHEREAS, Reclassification No. 2018-00314 is to reclassify the property from the “RM- 4” Multiple-family Residential Zone to the “RM-3.5” Multiple-family Residential Zone; and WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 18152 proposes a 1-lot subdivision for 19 condominiums; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA -2- Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on September 20, 2018 and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard., Anaheim, California; at the Anaheim Public Library, Central Library at 500 West Broadway, Anaheim, California; and, the Ponderosa Joint Use Library at 240 East Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim, California. Copies of said document were also available for purchase; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMP No. 356"). A complete copy of MMP No. 356 is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City intends and desires to use the Mitigated Negative Declaration as the environmental documentation required by CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on October 15, 2018, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Code, to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, based upon a thorough review of the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including MMP No. 356 and the comments received to date and the responses prepared, the Planning Commission, based upon a thorough review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and related documents and the evidence received concerning the Mitigated Negative Declaration, does find and determine as follows: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual and, together with MMP No. 356, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project; -3- 2. That it has carefully reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) prior to acting upon the Proposed Project; 3. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMP No. 356 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the evidence received to date, does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) and find and determine as follows: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual and, together with MMP No. 356, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project; 2. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMP No. 356 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission; 3. That the Planning Commission approve and adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP No. 356; and 4. That the Planning Commission authorize and direct City staff to file with the Clerk of the County of Orange a Notice of Determination in accordance with Section 15075(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. -4- THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on October 15, 2018, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of October, 2018. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 -5- EXHIBIT “B” -6- -7- -8- -9- -10- [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 3 - 1 - PC2018-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVE AND ADOPT PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2017-00518 (DEV2017-00094) (3534-3538 WEST SAVANNA STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan Amendment ("General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518") for certain real property commonly known as 3534-3538 West Savanna Street in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), for the purpose of allowing the applicant to construct 19 attached, single-family residences ; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.78 acres in size and is located in the "RM-4" Multiple-Family Residential Zone and the regulations contained in Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply. The Property is designated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan for "Low-Medium Density Residential" uses; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518 proposes to amend "Figure LU-4: Land Use Plan” of the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan to re-designate the Property designated as "Low-Medium Density Residential" to "Mid Density Residential" land uses; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518 is proposed in conjunction with a request (i) for approval of Reclassification No. 2018-00314 to reclassify the property from the “RM-4” Multiple-family Residential Zone to the “RM-3.5” Multiple-family Residential Zone; (ii) for approval of a conditional use permit to permit a 19-unit, attached single family residential project with modified development standards, which is designated as "Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951", and (iii) for approval of a tentative tract map to permit a 1-lot, 19 unit attached single-family residential subdivision of the Property for condominium purposes, which is designated as "Tentative Tract Map No. 18152". General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518, Reclassification No. 2018-00314, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951, Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, and the Project shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and - 2 - PC2018-*** WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on September 20, 2018 and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard., Anaheim, California; at the Anaheim Public Library, Central Library at 500 West Broadway, Anaheim, California; and, the Ponderosa Joint Use Library at 240 East Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim, California. Copies of said document were also available for purchase; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on October 15, 2018, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to consider the Addendum and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does hereby find: 1. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518 maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan, as the proposed modifications to the General Plan are consistent with Goals 1.1, 2.1, 4.1 and 6.1 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to preserve and enhance the quality and character of Anaheim’s mosaic of unique neighborhoods, to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities, to address the City’s diverse housing needs, and to promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding neighborhoods. 2. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518 would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the proposed amendment to the Anaheim General Plan would result in residential development opportunities. 3. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518 would maintain the balance of land uses within the City because the proposed amendment would provide quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs and would be consistent with the existing Low-Medium and Medium Density Residential designations for the neighboring properties to the north, south, east, and west. - 3 - PC2018-*** 4. That the Property to be re-designated by proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518 is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses because the project is designed to integrate into the surrounding neighborhood. and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Anaheim approve and adopt General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518 in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2018-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on October 15, 2018, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of October, 2018. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2018-*** - 6 - PC2018-*** EXHIBIT “B” [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 4 - 1 - PC2018-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00314 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2017-00094) (3534-3538 WEST SAVANNA STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to rezone or reclassify that certain real property located at 3534-3538 West Savanna Street in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") from the "RM-4" Multiple-Family Residential Zone to the “RM- 3.5” Multiple-Family Residential Zone, which reclassification is designated as Reclassification No. 2018-00314; and WHEREAS, the Property is currently developed with two single-family residences and is located in the "RM-4" Multiple-Family Residential Zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Low-Medium Density Residential land uses; and WHEREAS, Reclassification No. 2018-00314 is proposed in conjunction with a request (i) for approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518 to redesginate the property from Low-Medium Density Residential to Mid Density Residential; (ii) for approval of a conditional use permit to permit a 19-unit, attached single family residential project with modified development standards, which is designated as "Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951", and (iii) for approval of a tentative tract map to permit a 1-lot, 19 unit attached single-family residential subdivision of the Property for condominium purposes, which is designated as "Tentative Tract Map No. 18152". General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518, Reclassification No. 2018-00314, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951, Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, and the Project shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, on October 15, 2018, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"), to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Reclassification No. 2018-00314 to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for "projects", as that term is defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; and - 2 - PC2018-*** WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on September 20, 2018 and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard., Anaheim, California; at the Anaheim Public Library, Central Library at 500 West Broadway, Anaheim, California; and, the Ponderosa Joint Use Library at 240 East Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim, California. Copies of said document were also available for purchase; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. Reclassification of the Property from the "RM-4" Multiple-Family Residential Zone to the “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential Zone is consistent with the Property’s proposed Mid Density Residential land use designation in the General Plan, now pending. 2. The proposed reclassification of the Property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community and is compatible with the adjacent properties to the north, south, east and west, which are developed with multiple-family residential homes. 3. The proposed reclassification of the Property does properly relate to the zone and its permitted uses locally established in close proximity to the Property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community in that surrounding properties located within the boundaries of the City of Anaheim include multiple family residential uses within the “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential Zone. and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. - 3 - PC2018-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Reclassification No. 2018-00314 to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to rezone and reclassify the Property into the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential Zone and recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance reclassifying the Property in accordance with Reclassification No. 2018-00314. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the Property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole discretion. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2018. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on October 15, 2018, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of October, 2018. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2018-*** [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 5 - 1 - PC2018-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVE AND ADOPT PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951 (DEV2017-00094) (3534-3538 WEST SAVANNA STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951 to permit the construction of a 19-unit attached, single-family residential project with modified development standards, i.e., a reduction in the interior and building-to-building setback requirements of the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential Zone, for that certain real property located at 3534-3538 West Savanna Street in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951 is proposed in conjunction with (i) a request to amend "Figure LU-4: Land Use Plan” of the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan to re-designate the Property designated as "Low-Medium Density Residential" to "Mid Density Residential" land uses, which amendment to the General Plan is designated as "General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518", (ii) for approval of Reclassification No. 2018-00314 to reclassify the property from the “RM-4” Multiple-family Residential Zone to the “RM-3.5” Multiple-family Residential Zone and (iii) for approval of a tentative tract map to permit a 19-unit attached, single-family residential subdivision of the Property, which is designated as "Tentative Tract Map No. 18152". General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518, Reclassification No. 2018- 00314, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951, and Tentative Tract Map No. 18152 shall be referred to herein collectively as the “Proposed Project”; and WHEREAS, single family, attached dwelling development within the "RM-3.5" Single- Family Residential Zone is subject to the approval by the Planning Commission of a conditional use permit pursuant to Subsection .010 of Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development). Pursuant to subsection .030 of Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development), the minimum setbacks set forth in Section 18.06.090 of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple- Family Residential Zones) may be modified in order to achieve a high quality project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. If approved, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951 will permit the reduction in interior and building-to-building setback requirements of the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential Zone; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.78 acres in size and is currently improved with two single family residences. The Property is located in the "RM-4" Multiple-Family Residential Zone, which is a zone under the Zoning Code. The Property is designated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan for "Low-Medium Density Residential" uses; and - 2 - PC2018-*** WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on September 20, 2018 and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California; at the Anaheim Public Library, Central Library at 500 West Broadway, Anaheim, California; and, the Ponderosa Joint Use Library at 240 East Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim, California. Copies of said document were also available for purchase; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 15, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection .030 (Modification of Other Standards) of Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development), this Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, including the plans submitted by the applicant, does hereby find and determine the following facts with respect to Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951: 1. The uses within the Project are compatible with the surrounding land uses; 2. New buildings or structures related to the Project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area. Said existing buildings conform with the provisions of the Zoning Code; 3. Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate; 4. The Project is consistent with any adopted design guidelines applicable to the Property and the Project; - 3 - PC2018-*** 5. The size and shape of the site proposed for the Project is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area; 6. The traffic generated by the Project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; 7. The Project complies with the General Plan and will comply with the zoning for the Property. 8. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Anaheim approve and adopt Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951, contingent upon and subject to: (1) the adoption by the City Council of (i) a resolution approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518, (ii) Reclassification No. 2018-00314 and (iii) a resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, all of which entitlements are now pending; (2) the mitigation measures set forth in MMP 356, and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 4 - PC2018-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on October 15, 2018, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of October, 2018. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2018-*** - 6 - PC2018-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05951 (DEV2017-00094) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 1 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works, Development Services 2 Prepare and submit a final drainage study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works, Development Services 3 The Owner shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works, Development Services 4 The owner shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for Public Works Development Services Division review upon request. Public Works, Development Services 5 Submit Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant Redevelopment projects. identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. Submit three (3) copies and a plan checking deposit to the Public Works/Development Services for consideration and approval. Public Works, Development Services 6 Submit a Preliminary Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall address grading and any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works, Development Services - 7 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 7 That the Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 8 Prior to issuance of any demolition or building permits, if clearing and/or construction activities would occur during the raptor or migratory bird nesting season (February 15 to August 15), the Applicant and/or its contractor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds up to 14 days before construction activities. The qualified biologist shall survey the construction zone and a 500-foot buffer surrounding the construction zone to determine whether the activities taking place have the potential to disturb or otherwise harm nesting birds. Surveys shall be repeated if project activities are suspended or delayed for more than 15 days during nesting season. If active nest(s) are identified during the preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall establish a 100-foot no-activity setback for migratory bird nests and a 250-foot setback for raptor nests. No ground disturbance should occur within the no-activity setback until the nest is deemed inactive by the qualified biologist. Details of compliance shall be provided in conjunction with or on plans submitted for permits. MM-1 Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 9 Prior to issuance of any demolition or building permits, the project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor and archeologist during construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor(s) must be approved by the tribal representatives and will be present on-site during the construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed. The archeologist will monitor grading activities and must complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs completed by both the archaeologist and the tribal monitor must be submitted to the Planning Division on a weekly basis in order to determine compliance with the mitigation measure. In the unlikely event that remains are uncovered by construction crews, all excavation and grading activities shall be halted and the Anaheim Police Department would be contacted (the Department would then contact the County Coroner). This is a standard condition under California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b). MM-2 Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 10 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit draft Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that are prepared by an authorized professional for review and approval by the City Engineer, Public Works, Traffic Division - 8 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Planning Director, and City Attorney, which will generally provide for the following: a. A requirement that residents shall use designated parking area, including garages, only for the parking of vehicles. b. A provision that parking garages are subject to inspection by the Association or City of Anaheim staff. c. A provision requiring that proposed amendments to the CC&Rs shall be submitted for review to the City Engineer, Planning Director or designee, and shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to the amendment being valid. d. A provision that the City is a third-party beneficiary to the CC&Rs and has the right, but not the obligation, to enforce any of the provisions of the CC&Rs relative to common area and utility maintenance, Water Quality Management Plan, and internal parking. 11 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, excluding model homes, the final map shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and the Orange County Surveyor for technical review and that all applicable conditions of approval have been complied with and then shall be filed in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works, Development Services 12 That a private water system with separate water service for fire protection, irrigation, and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 13 Per California Water Code, Division 1, Chapter 8, Article 5, Section 537- 537.5) as amended by Senate Bill 7, water submetering shall be furnished and installed by the Owner/Developer and a water submeter shall be installed to each individual unit. Provisions for the ongoing maintenance and operation (including meter billing) of the submeters shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 14 That all backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 15 That all requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 9 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 16 That all existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 17 The Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC & Rs for the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 18 That the Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 19 That a private water system with separate water service for fire protection, irrigation, and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 20 Per California Water Code, Division 1, Chapter 8, Article 5, Section 537- 537.5) as amended by Senate Bill 7, water submetering shall be furnished and installed by the Owner/Developer and a water submeter shall be installed to each individual unit. Provisions for the ongoing maintenance and operation (including meter billing) of the submeters shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 21 That all backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 10 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. 22 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 23 During final plan check prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit the project must comply with all the design and construction- related actions in the site specific Geotechnical Report prepared by Strata- Tech. These design requirements will be confirmed by the City Engineer during the final plan check prior to the issuance of any building permit. In addition, the Applicant must remove and re-compact the underlying soils and provide additional slab and foundation support in order to address potential liquefaction risks. The removal and re-compaction of the underyling soil will be confirmed by the building inspector, the City Engineer, and a representative of Strata-Tech prior to the framing phase of the project’s construction. The recommendations and requirements of the Strata-Tech study must be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. MM-3 Planning and Building Department, Building Division & Public Works Department, Development Services PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 24 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Numbers shall be visible during hours of darkness. Police Department 25 All public improvements shall be constructed by the developer, inspected and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Development Services 26 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works, Development Services 27 Set all Monuments in accordance with the final map and submit all centerline ties to Public Works Department. Any monuments damaged as a result of construction shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works, Development Services 28 Prior to final building and zoning inspections, all required WQMP items shall be inspected and operational. Public Works, Development Services 29 Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections, the property owner/developer shall execute and record with the Orange County Recorder an unsubordinated declaration of Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to run with the land, satisfactory to the City Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which restricts the installation of vehicle gates across the project driveways or access roads as the site design does not allow any such gates to conform to City of Public Works, Traffic Engineering - 11 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 pertaining to gate set back distance, turnaround area, guest phone, separate lane for guest access, and minimum width for ingress/egress as required by the Fire Department. Should gates be desired in the future, an amendment to the CC&R’s approved by the City Engineer, Planning Director and the City Attorney's office and recorded. Gates, if any, shall comply with the current version of City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 30 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 31 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 32 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities Water Engineering ON-GOING DURING PROJECT GRADING, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS 33 Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Police Department 34 The Owner shall be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-way, public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface improvements shall be included in the recorded Master C, C & R’s for the project and the City easement deeds. Public Utilities Water Engineering 35 During the demolition phase, the Applicant, and the contractors, must adhere to all requirements governing the handling, removal, and disposal of asbestos-containing materials, lead paint, underground septic tanks, and other hazardous substances and materials that may be encountered during demolition and land clearance activities. The City’s Inspector will ensure compliance by inspecting the site during the demolition phase. Any contamination encountered during the demolition, grading, and/or site preparation activities must also be removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable laws prior to the issuance of any building permit. MM-4 Planning and Building Department, Building Division - 12 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 36 10 days prior to the start of the demolition phase, the City Inspector shall ensure that the contractors use construction equipment that includes working mufflers and other sound suppression mechanisms as a means to reduce machinery noise. The Inspector must inspect the equipment prior to the start of the demolition phase. MM-5 Planning and Building Department, Building Division GENERAL 37 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): • 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power poles, street lights, and trees. • 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 38 No public water main or public water facilities shall be installed in private alleys or paseo areas. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 39 No public water mains or laterals allowed under driveways, parking stalls, or parking lots. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 40 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL listed meter, Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator Register, no equals. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 41 Water service for the development shall be master-metered. No public water main shall be allowed on site. Submetering shall be furnished and installed by the Owner/Developer and a water submeter shall be installed to each individual unit as required by California Water Code per Condition of Approval No. 444 above. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 42 All new services shall be connected to the existing 8-inch ductile iron water main in Savanna Street. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 43 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 44 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to grading permits, final maps, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, security plans, parks and trail plans, and fire and life safety plans, etc. Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 13 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 45 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 46 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 47 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning Department, Planning Services Division [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 6 - 1 - PC2018-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 (DEV2017-00094) (3534-3538 WEST SAVANNA STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 18152 to establish a 1-lot, 19-unit attached residential subdivision for that certain real property located at 3534-3538 West Savanna Street Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 18152 is proposed in conjunction with a request (i) to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to re-designate the Property designated as "Low-Medium Density Residential" to "Mid Density Residential" land uses, which amendment to the General Plan is designated as General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518, and (ii) for approval of Reclassification No. 2018-00314 to reclassify the property from the “RM-4” Multiple-Family Residential Zone to the “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential Zone, (iii) for approval of a conditional use permit to permit construction of 19 attached single family residences with modified development standards, which is designated as "Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951". General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518, Reclassification No. 2018-00314, Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05951, and Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.78 acres in size and is currently improved with two single family residences. The Property is located in the "RM-4" Multiple-Family Residential Zone, which is a zone under the Zoning Code. The Property is designated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan for "Low-Medium Density Residential" uses; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on September 20, 2018 and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California; at the Anaheim Public Library, Central Library at 500 West Broadway, - 2 - PC2018-*** Anaheim, California; and, the Ponderosa Joint Use Library at 240 East Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim, California. Copies of said document were also available for purchase; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 15, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this Planning Commission finds and determines and recommends that the City Council also find and determine that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures attached to that concurrent Resolution and contained in MMP 356 and that the City Council approve and adopt MMP 356; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, does find and determine and recommends that the City Council so find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim, and more particularly with the "Mid Density Residential" land use designation proposed as part of General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518, now pending. 2. That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning and development standards of the "RM-4" Multiple Family Residential Zone and the regulations contained in Chapter 18.34 (Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone) of the Code. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Proposed Project. 4. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified. 5. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. - 3 - PC2018-*** 6. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Anaheim approve Tentative Tract Map No. 18152, contingent upon and subject to: (1) the adoption by the City Council of (i) a resolution approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00518; an ordinance approving Reclassification No. 2018-00314, all of which entitlements are now pending; the mitigation measures set forth in MMP 356; and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. - 4 - PC2018-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2018. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Section 17.08.104 of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October 15, 2018, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of October, 2018. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2018-*** - 6 - PC2018-*** EXHIBIT “B” TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18152 (DEV2017-00094) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP 1 The legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim, for road, public utilities and other public purposes, the right-of- way easements 32 feet from the centerline of Savanna Street. Public Works, Development Services 2 Prior to final map approval, all existing structures shall be demolished. The developer shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division. Public Works, Development Services 3 Prior to final map approval, all lots shall be assigned street addresses by the Building Division. Public Works, Development Services 4 The vehicular access rights to Savanna Street shall be released and relinquished to the City of Anaheim, except at approved street openings. Public Works, Development Services 5 The developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees required under the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services 6 The developer shall submit improvement plans, for the construction of required public improvements, to the Public Works Development Services Division for review, approval, and to determine the bond amounts. Public Works, Development Services 7 The final map shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim, Public Works Development Services Division and to the Orange County Surveyor for technical correctness review and approval. Public Works, Development Services 8 The developer shall execute a maintenance covenant with the City of Anaheim in a form that is approved by the City Engineer and the City attorney for the private improvements including but not limited to private utilities, drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation, private street lights, etc. in addition to maintenance requirements established in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as applicable to the project. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Public Works, Development Services 9 The applicant shall execute a Subdivision Agreement and submit security in an amount acceptable to the City Engineer to guarantee construction of the public improvements required herein. Security deposit shall be in accordance to City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The agreement shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Public Works, Development Services - 7 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 10 Provide a Monumentation bond in an amount specified in writing by a Licensed Land Surveyor of Record. Public Works, Development Services 11 Comply with all applicable requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services 12 The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnities”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnities to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnities concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnities and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnities in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 13 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to grading permits, final maps, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, security plans, parks and trail plans, and fire and life safety plans, etc. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 14 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 15 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET PAGE 1 INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF ANAHEIM SAVANNA TOWNHOMES 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2017-00094 LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT 200 ANAHEIM BOULEVARD ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 90220 REPORT PREPARED BY: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 2211 SOUTH HACIENDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 107 HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA 91745 SEPTEMBER 7, 2018 ANAH 003 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET PAGE 2 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET PAGE 3 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT NAME: Savanna Townhomes. PROJECT ADDRESS: 3534-3538 Savanna Street. APPLICANT: Mr. Chris Segesman, Bonanni Development. 5500 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120, Huntington Beach, California 92649. CITY AND COUNTY: Anaheim, Orange County. DESCRIPTION: The City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, in its capacity as the Lead Agency, is reviewing a request by Bonanni Development to subdivide an existing 33,841 square-foot (0.78- acre) site located at 3534-3538 Savanna Street. The subdivision will allow for the construction of 19 three- story townhome units totaling 24,204 square feet of building floor area. A total of 5,931 square feet of common open space and 10,584 square feet of landscaping (31%) will be provided. The project will provide 45 total parking spaces. Each unit will be equipped with a two-car garage for a total of 38 enclosed parking spaces. Seven additional parking spaces will be reserved for guests. Access to the site will be provided by a 24-foot wide driveway located along the south side of Savanna Street. FINDINGS: The environmental analysis provided in the attached Initial Study indicates that the proposed project will not result in any potentially significant environmental impacts. For this reason, the City of Anaheim determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed project. The following findings may also be made based on the analysis contained in the attached Initial Study: ● The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. ● The proposed project will not have the potential to achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. ● The proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, when considering planned or proposed development in the City. ● The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly. Nicholas Taylor, Associate Planner Date CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET PAGE 4 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET PAGE 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................... 7 1.1 Purpose of the Initial Study ................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Initial Study’s Organization ................................................................................................... 8 2.0 Project Description ........................................................................... 9 2.1 Project Overview .................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Project Location ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 13 2.5 Discretionary Actions........................................................................................................... 22 3.0 City of Anaheim Environmental Checklist Form ............................... 25 3.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................. 31 3.2 Agriculture & Forestry Resources ........................................................................................ 34 3.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................................ 37 3.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................................................ 47 3.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................... 51 3.6 Geology & Soils .................................................................................................................... 57 3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................. 64 3.8 Hazards & Hazardous Materials ......................................................................................... 68 3.9 Hydrology & Water Quality ................................................................................................. 74 3.10 Land Use & Planning ........................................................................................................... 83 3.11 Mineral Resources .............................................................................................................. 88 3.12 Noise .................................................................................................................................... 90 3.13 Population & Housing ........................................................................................................ 101 3.14 Public Services ................................................................................................................... 104 3.15 Recreation .......................................................................................................................... 108 3.16 Transportation ................................................................................................................... 110 3.17 Tribal Cultural Resources .................................................................................................. 126 3.18 Utilities .............................................................................................................................. 129 3.19 Mandatory Findings of Significance .................................................................................. 136 4.0 Conclusions .................................................................................... 141 4.1 Findings ...............................................................................................................................141 4.2 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program ....................................................................141 5.0 References ..................................................................................... 147 5.1 Preparers ............................................................................................................................ 147 5.2 References .......................................................................................................................... 147 Appendix .................................................... Provided under a separate cover CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET PAGE 6 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET INITIAL STUDY ● SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION PAGE 7 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY The City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, in its capacity as the Lead Agency, is reviewing a request by Bonanni Development to subdivide an existing 33,841 square-foot (0.78-acre) site located at 3534-3538 Savanna Street. This project site currently consists of two parcels (APNs: 134-252-16 and 134- 252-17). The subdivision will allow for the construction of 19 three-story townhome units totaling 24,204 square feet of building floor area. A total of 5,931 square feet of common open space and 10,584 square feet (31%) of landscaping will be provided. The project will provide a total of 45 parking spaces. Each unit will include a garage that will contain two enclosed spaces. Guest parking will consist of seven parking spaces. Access to the site will be provided by a 24-foot wide driveway located along the south side of Savanna Street.1 The project Applicant is Mr. Chris Segesman, Bonanni Development, 5500 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120, Huntington Beach, California 92649. The City of Anaheim is the designated Lead Agency for the proposed project and will be responsible for the project’s environmental review.2 The construction of the proposed project will require the approval of a Tentative Tract Map (TTM No. 18152), a General Plan Amendment (GPA), a Zoning Reclassification (RCL), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The aforementioned discretionary actions, together with the proposed development, are considered to be a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).3 As part of the proposed project's environmental review, the City of Anaheim authorized the preparation of this Initial Study.4 Although this Initial Study was prepared with consultant support, the analysis, conclusions, and findings made as part of its preparation fully represent the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Anaheim, in its capacity as the Lead Agency. The primary purpose of CEQA is to ensure that decision-makers and the public understand the environmental impacts of the proposed project and that decision-makers have considered such impacts before making a decision on the project. Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, purposes of this Initial Study include the following: ● To provide the City information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR), mitigated negative declaration, or negative declaration; ● To facilitate the project's environmental assessment early in the design and development of the project; ● To eliminate unnecessary EIRs; ● To determine the nature and extent of any impacts associated with the proposed project; and, ● To enable modification of the project to mitigate adverse impacts of the project. 1 Begovich Architects. Site Plan. Plan dated May 1, 2018. 2 California, State of. California Public Resources Code. Division 13, Chapter 2.5. Definitions. as Amended 2001. §21067. 3 California, State of. Title 14. California Code of Regulations. Chapter 3. Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. as Amended 1998 (CEQA Guidelines). §15060 (b). 4 California, State of. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines § 15050. As Amended. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET INITIAL STUDY ● SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION PAGE 8 Based on the results of this Initial Study, the City has determined, that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental document for the project's environmental review pursuant to CEQA. This Initial Study and the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be forwarded to responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and the public for review and comment. 1.2 INITIAL STUDY’S ORGANIZATION The following annotated outline summarizes the contents of this Initial Study: ● Section 1 Introduction, provides the procedural context surrounding this Initial Study's preparation and insight into its composition. ● Section 2 Project Description, provides an overview of the existing environment as it relates to the project area and describes the proposed project's physical and operational characteristics. ● Section 3 Environmental Analysis, includes an analysis of potential impacts associated with the proposed project's construction and the subsequent operation. ● Section 4 Findings, indicates the conclusions of the environmental analysis and the Mandatory Findings of Significance. In addition, this section also includes the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). ● Section 5 References, identifies the sources used in the preparation of this Initial Study. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 9 SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, in its capacity as the Lead Agency, is reviewing a request by Bonanni Development to subdivide an existing 33,841 square-foot (0.78-acre) site located at 3534-3538 Savanna Street. This project site currently consists of two parcels (APNs: 134-252-16 and 134- 252-17) and is occupied by two older single-family units. The subdivision will allow for the construction of 19 three-story townhome units totaling 24,204 square feet (71.5% of the site) of building floor area. A total of 5,931 (17.5% of the site) square feet of common open space and 10,584 square feet (31% of the site) of landscaping will be provided. The project will provide a total of 45 parking spaces that will include 38 enclosed spaces (two spaces in each garage) and seven guest parking spaces. Access to the site will be provided by a 24-foot wide driveway that will connect with the south side of Savanna Street.5 The project is described in greater detail in Section 2.4. 2.2 PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located in the southwestern portion of the City of Anaheim. The City of Anaheim is located approximately 21 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and 6.3 miles northwest of Santa Ana. Anaheim is bounded by the cities of Buena Park, Fullerton, Placentia, and Yorba Linda to the north; the cities of Orange, Garden Grove, Stanton, Cypress, and unincorporated Orange County to the south; the Santa Ana Mountains to the east; and the City of Buena Park to the west.6 Major physiographic features in the area include the Puente-Chino Hills, located approximately two miles to the north of the City, and the Santa Ana Mountains, which extend along the City’s eastern boundary. Regional access to the City is provided by the Riverside Freeway (SR-91), the Orange Freeway (SR-57), the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5), and the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55).7 The project site is located along the south side of Savanna Street. The site’s legal addresses are 3534-3538 Savanna Street. Major streets located in the vicinity of the project site include Knott Avenue, located 534 feet to the east; Ball Road, located 1,000 feet to the south; Orange Avenue, located 0.32 mile to the north; and Valley View Street, located 0.86 mile to the west of the site. The location of the City of Anaheim in a regional context is shown in Exhibit 2-1. An area wide map is shown in Exhibit 2-2. Finally, a vicinity map is shown in Exhibit 2-3. 5 Begovich Architects. Site Plan. Plan dated May 1, 2018. 6 Quantum GIS. Southern California Cities Shapefile. 7 Google Earth. Site accessed on April 18, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 10 EXHIBIT 2-1 REGIONAL MAP SOURCE: QUANTUM GIS No r t h Project Site CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 11 EXHIBIT 2-2 AREA WIDE MAP SOURCE: QUANTUM GIS Project Site No r t h CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 12 EXHIBIT 2-3 VICINITY MAP SOURCE: QUANTUM GIS Project Site No r t h Buena Park CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 13 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project area is located in the midst of a residential neighborhood located in the southwestern portion of the City. The following land uses and development are located near the project site: ● North of the project site. Savanna Street extends along the north side of the project site. Apartment complexes and other high density residential development occupy the frontage along the north side of Savanna Street. ● South of the project site. Apartments are located adjacent to the project site to the south. Single- family residential units are located southwest of the project site along Marian Way. ● East of the project site. Townhouses are located adjacent to the project site to the east. Knott Avenue is located 534 feet further east of the site. ● West of the project site. Apartments are located west of the project site.8 Marian Way is located 190 feet further west of the site.9 The site is currently occupied by two single-family units. An aerial photograph is provided in Exhibit 2-4. 2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.4.1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project involves the construction of 19 new, three-story townhome units within a 0.78-acre (33,841 square feet) site. The project’s implementation will require the demolition of the existing structural improvements that occupy the site. These two units total approximately 4,000 square feet. The project elements are described below: ● Project Site. The 0.78-acre project site currently consists of two parcels (APNs: 134-252-16 and 134-252-17). The project site has a maximum lot depth (north to south) of 213 feet and a maximum lot width (east to west) of 158 feet. The proposed project will have a density of 24.35 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) and a lot coverage of 35 percent. The project’s overall lot coverage was calculated by taking the total building footprint (11,821 square feet) and dividing that number by the project site’s total land area. The site’s southern, eastern, and western boundaries will be enclosed by a new six-foot high concrete block wall.10 ● Townhome Units. The project will include the construction of 19 three-story townhome units with a total floor area of 24,204 square feet. These 19 townhome units will be distributed through five separate buildings (referred to herein as Buildings A-E). 8 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Site Survey. The site visit was conducted on April 5, 2018. 9 Google Earth. Site accessed on April 18, 2018. 10 Begovich Architects. Site Plan. Plan dated May 1, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 14 EXHIBIT 2-4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SOURCE: GOOGLE EARTH Project Site No r t h Savanna St Ma r i a n W a y CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 15 Building A will consist of five units; Building B will total six units; Building C will contain two units; Building D will consist of three units; and Building E will total three units. The townhome units will have a maximum height of 36 feet and 7 inches. A total of two floor plan options will be offered: Plan 1A and Plan 1B. Of the total number of units that will be provided, 14 will consist of Plan 1A units and five will consist of Plan 2B units. Each floor plan will feature two bedrooms, though Plan 1A units will have a total floor area of 1,276 square feet while Plan 1B units will have a floor area of 1,268 square feet. These units will be equipped with double-paned windows, central air conditioning, and solid core doors.11 ● Open Space and Landscaping. A total of 5,931 square feet of common open space will be provided. Various amenities, such as a barbeque area and a tot lot, will be provided. In addition, approximately 10,584 square feet of landscaping will be installed translating into approximately 31 percent of the total site area.12 ● Parking and Access. A total of 45 parking spaces will be provided. Each unit will include a two- car garage for a total of 38 enclosed parking spaces. In addition, a total of seven guest parking spaces will be provided. Access to the project site will be provided by a 24-foot wide driveway located on the south side of Savanna Street. An internal drive aisle ranging in width from 20 to 30 feet will facilitate internal circulation.13 The proposed project is summarized in Table 2-1, which is shown below. The proposed site plan is provided in Exhibit 2-5 and the building elevations are provided in Exhibits 2-6 through 2-10. Table 2-1 Project Summary Table Project Element Description Site Area 33,841 sq. ft. (0.78 acres) Total Number of Units 19 Total Building Floor Area 24,204 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 36 ft. and 7 in.; three stories maximum Project Density 24.35 du/acre Lot Coverage 35 percent Number of Floor Plan 1A Units 15 Number of Floor Plan 1B Units 4 Floor Plan 1A Floor Area 1,276 sq. ft. Floor Plan 1B Floor Area 1,268 sq. ft. Common Open Space 5,931 sq. ft. Landscaping 10,584 sq. ft (31.2% of site) Parking 45 parking spaces: 38 garage spaces and 7 guest spaces Source: Begovich Architects. Site Plan. Plan dated May 1, 2018. 11 Begovich Architects. Site Plan. Plan dated May 1, 2018. 12 Ibid.. 13 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 16 EXHIBIT 2-5 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SOURCE: BEGOVICH ARCHITECTS No r t h CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 17 EXHIBIT 2-6 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS SOURCE: BEGOVICH ARCHITECTS CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 18 EXHIBIT 2-7 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS SOURCE: BEGOVICH ARCHITECTS CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 19 EXHIBIT 2-8 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS SOURCE: BEGOVICH ARCHITECTS CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 20 EXHIBIT 2-9 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS SOURCE: BEGOVICH ARCHITECTS CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 21 EXHIBIT 2-10 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS SOURCE: BEGOVICH ARCHITECTS CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 22 2.4.2 CONSTRUCTION CHARACTERISTICS The construction of the phase for the proposed project would take approximately 11 months to complete. The key construction phases are outlined below: ● Demolition. The existing on-site improvements and buildings will be demolished and removed during this phase. This phase will take one month to complete. ● Site Preparation. The project site will be readied for the construction of the proposed project. This phase will take approximately one month to complete and will involve the removal of trees, pavement, a clearing/grubbing of the site. ● Grading. The project site will be graded and trenched during this phase. This phase will take one month to complete. The site will be over excavated approximately three feet and these soils will be re-compacted. ● Construction. The 19 townhome units will erected during this phase. This phase will take approximately five months to complete. ● Paving. This phase will involve the paving of the site. This phase will take approximately one month to complete. ● Landscaping and Finishing. This phase will involve the planting of landscaping and the completion of the on-site improvements. This phase will take approximately two months to complete. 2.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS A Discretionary Action is an action taken by a government agency (for this project, the government agency is the City of Anaheim) that calls for an exercise of judgment in deciding whether to approve a project. The proposed project will require the approval of the following discretionary actions: ● The approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the site’s land use designation from Low-Medium Density to Mid Density; ● The approval of a Zoning Reclassification from RM-4 (Multiple-Family Residential) to RM-3.5 (Multiple-Family Residential); ● The approval of a Tentative Tract Map (TTM No. 18152) for a one lot subdivision for 19 units; ● The approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow residential development within the RM- 3.5 Zone. The CUP will also allow for a modification of the required interior, side, and building to building setback standards; CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 23 ● The approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 2 ● PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 24 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET INITIAL STUDY ● SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 25 CITY OF ANAHEIM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Form Revision Date: 11/15/2016 CASE NO.: Development Project No. 2017-00094. SITE ADDRESS: 3534-3538 Savanna Street. PROJECT NAME: Savanna Townhomes. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Anaheim, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162, Anaheim, CA 92805. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Nicholas Taylor, Associate Planner. Email: NJTaylor@anaheim.net. Phone: (714) 765-4323. PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT SPONSOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS: The project Applicant is Mr. Chris Segesman, Bonanni Development, 5500 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120, Huntington Beach, California 92649. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The project site’s General Plan land use designation is Low- Medium Density. Project Site No r t h Savanna St Ma r i a n W a y CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET INITIAL STUDY ● SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 26 ZONING: The project site is zoned RM-4 (Multiple-family residential). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, in its capacity as the Lead Agency, is reviewing a request by Bonanni Development to subdivide an existing 33,841 square-foot (0.78-acre) site located at 3534-3538 Savanna Street. This project site currently consists of two parcels (APNs: 134-252-16 and 134-252-17). The subdivision will allow for the construction of 19 three-story townhome units totaling 24,204 square feet of building floor area. A total of 5,931 square feet of common open space and 10,584 square feet (31%) of landscaping will be provided. The project will provide a total of 45 parking spaces. Each unit will include a garage that will contain two enclosed spaces. Guest parking will consist of seven parking spaces. Access to the site will be provided by a 24-foot wide driveway located along the south side of Savanna Street. PROJECT SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: The project area is located in the midst of a residential neighborhood located in the southwestern portion of the City. The following land uses and development are located near the project site: ● North of the project site. Savanna Street extends along the north side of the project site. Apartment complexes and other high density residential development occupy the frontage along the north side of Savanna Street. ● South of the project site. Apartments are located adjacent to the project site to the south. Single-family residential units are located southwest of the project site along Marian Way. ● East of the project site. Townhouses are located adjacent to the project site to the east. Knott Avenue is located 534 feet further east of the site. ● West of the project site. Apartments are located west of the project site.14 Marian Way is located 190 feet further west of the site.15 The site is currently occupied by two single-family units totaling approximately 4,000 square feet. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED: The project would require various ministerial approvals such as building permits, grading permits, occupancy permits, and a permit to connect to the City’s water and sewer lines. The project would also be required to submit a Notice of Intent to comply with the General Construction Activity NPDES Permit to the State Water Resources Control Board. 14 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Site Survey. The site visit was conducted on April 5, 2018. 15 Google Earth. Site accessed on April 18, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET INITIAL STUDY ● SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 27 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.  Aesthetics  Agriculture & Forestry Resources  Air Quality  Biological Resources  Cultural Resources  Geology & Soils  Greenhouse Gas Emissions  Hazards & Hazardous Materials  Hydrology & Water Quality  Land Use & Planning  Mineral Resources  Noise  Population & Housing  Public Services  Recreation  Transportation & Circulation  Tribal Cultural Resources  Utilities/Service Systems  Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation:  I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.  I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.  I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.  I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET INITIAL STUDY ● SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 28  I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. ____________________________________ _________________ Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Date ____________________________________ _________________ Printed Name/Title Phone No. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET INITIAL STUDY ● SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 29 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 2) A list of “Supporting Information Sources” must be attached and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the Narrative Summary for each section. 3) Response Column Heading Definitions: A). Potentially Significant Impact is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. B). Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact”. The mitigation measures must be described, along with a brief explanation of how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. C). Less Than Significant Impact applies where the project creates no significant impacts, only Less Than Significant impacts. D). No Impact applies where a project does not create an impact in that category. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one proposed (e.g., the project falls outside of a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 4) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to a tiering, program EIR, Master EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Section 15062(c)(3)(D)). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET INITIAL STUDY ● SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 30 c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated”, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 5) Incorporate into the checklist any references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., the General Plan, zoning ordinance). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 6) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and, b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 31 3.1 AESTHETICS Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.1.A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X 3.1.B. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway or local scenic expressway, scenic highway, or eligible scenic highway? X 3.1.C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X 3.1.D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X 3.1.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. The project’s implementation will not result in a loss of scenic views. Major physiographic features in the area include the Puente-Chino Hills, located approximately two miles to the north of the City, and the Santa Ana Mountains, which extend along the City’s eastern boundary.16 There are no available views of the Puente-Chino Hills or the Santa Ana Mountains available from the project site, Savanna Street, or Marian Way. Views of these scenic vistas are restricted since the existing streetscape and development obstructs the line-of-sight between the project site, Savanna Street, Marian Way, and the aforementioned mountains. The field survey that was conducted as part of this Initial Study confirmed the absence of views of the Puente-Chino Hills and the Santa Ana Mountains from the project area. Since the project’s implementation will not result in any loss of scenic vistas, no impacts will occur. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. B. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway or local scenic expressway, scenic highway, or eligible scenic highway? No Impact. According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the closest scenic highway is a four-mile segment of SR-91 from SR-55 to just east of the City of Anaheim’s corporate boundaries.17 The project site is located approximately 11 miles southwest of the scenic portion of SR- 91.18 The project site is not located within the City’s Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone and will not be subject to the development standards outlined for new development proposed within the 16 Google Earth. Website accessed April 19, 2018. 17 California Department of Transportation. Official Designated Scenic Highways. www.dot.ca.gov. Site accessed on April 19, 2018. 18 Google Earth. Site accessed on April 19, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 32 aforementioned corridor.19 Furthermore, the project’s construction will be restricted to the designated project site. As a result, no impacts to trees, rock outcroppings, and/or historic buildings located along the designated portion of SR-91 will occur and no mitigation is required. C. Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? No Impact. The project site is underutilized and is presently occupied by older single-family units. The site’s General Plan land use designation is Low-Medium Density. This land use designation 0.78- acre site can support up to 14 dwelling units (based on a ratio of 18 du/0.78 acres). The first single- family unit is a Craftsman style home while the second is a typical California Bungalow. Neither of these two units are of historic value (refer to Section 3.5). Both residential units are in a poor state of repair and the site’s parkway along the Savanna Street frontage is also poorly maintained. Once complete, the 19 townhome units will improve the visual appearance of the site and the surrounding areas by introducing newer architecture, articulated facades, neutral exterior colors, and drought tolerant landscaping. The project’s density of 24.35 du/acre is below the maximum permitted density of 28 du/acre allowed within the RM-4 zone. In addition, the project will have a lot coverage of 35 percent, which is less than the 55 percent allowed under the underlying zone. The project’s overall lot coverage was calculated by taking the total building footprint (11,821 square feet) and dividing that number by the project site’s total land area. Thus, the project’s size and density will be consistent with the requirements established for the RM-4 zone. Furthermore, the proposed project will be consistent with the size and massing of the surrounding land uses. The project site is located within a multiple- family residential neighborhood. The surrounding multiple-family units generally consist of two stories and have various heights ranging from 17 feet to 31 feet. Since the project’s implementation will improve the visual character and quality of the area, no impacts will result and no mitigation is required. D. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day- or night-time views in the area? Less than Significant Impact. Exterior lighting can be a nuisance to adjacent land uses that are sensitive to this lighting. This nuisance lighting is referred to as light trespass which is typically defined as the presence of unwanted light on properties located adjacent to the source of lighting. There are light sensitive residential uses located north, south, east, and west of the project site. Future sources of light emanating from the project site include vehicular headlights, interior lighting, and exterior lighting including street lamps and wall packs. The proposed project will be required to adhere to Section 18.42.090.030 of the City’s municipal code, which states the following: ● Lighting of Parking Areas Adjoining Residential Premises. Any lights provided to illuminate such parking areas shall be so arranged and directed as to reflect the light away from adjoining residential premises and shall not exceed a height of 12 feet. The City may require adjustments to the light fixture shielding at the time of final inspection to satisfy this requirement. 19 City of Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.18 – Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. Site accessed on April 19, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 33 The proposed project, like all new developments in the City, would be subject to the aforementioned regulations. Glare is related to light trespass and is defined as visual discomfort resulting from high contrast in brightness levels. Glare-related impacts can adversely affect day or nighttime views. As with lighting trespass, glare is of most concern if it would adversely affect sensitive land use or driver’s vision. The exterior façade surfaces will consist of non-reflective materials, such as stucco. However, the individual units will be equipped with energy efficient windows. The energy-efficient window and glazing systems that will be used for the project will dramatically reduce energy consumption because of lower heat loss, less air leakage, and warmer window surfaces. These windows feature double or triple glazing and specialized transparent coatings that will reduce or eliminate reflective glare. As a result, no significant glare-related impacts are anticipated. Nighttime glare and illumination has the potential to result in potentially significant impacts to sensitive receptors. The project site is located along a residential street and is located in close proximity to light sensitive uses. Many sources of light contribute to the ambient nighttime lighting conditions. These sources of nighttime light include street lights, security lighting, wall packs, vehicular headlights, and interior lighting. The proposed project will not introduce nighttime lighting that could potentially impact nearby sensitive receptors. As indicated previously, the closest sensitive receptors are the residential units abutting the property to the east, west, and south. These residential units will not be exposed to spillover lighting during the evening hours because the project will be in compliance with Section 18.42.090.030 of the City’s Municipal Code. As a result, the project’s potential impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 3.1.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Typically, aesthetic impacts are site-specific. As indicated in the previous sections, the proposed project will not restrict scenic views along the adjacent roadways, damage or interfere with any scenic resources or highways, degrade the visual character of the project sites and surrounding areas, or result in significant light and glare impacts; therefore, no cumulative impacts will occur as part of the proposed project’s implementation and no mitigation is required of the proposed project. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 34 3.2 AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY RESOURCES Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.2.A Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X 3.2.B Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? X 3.2.C Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined in Public Resources Code §4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X 3.2.D Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X 3.2.E Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X 3.2.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. According to the California Department of Conservation, the project site does not contain any areas of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance.20 The project site is located within a largely developed area of the City and there are no areas in close proximity to the project site that are classified as “Prime Farmland.” The project site is occupied by two single-family homes. In addition, the project site is located in the midst of a residential neighborhood. Since the implementation of the proposed project will not involve the conversion of prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance to urban uses, no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. 20 California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. Important Farmland in California 2014. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2014/ora14.pdf. Site accessed on April 19, 2018. The 2016 FMMP does not include Orange County: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2016/. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 35 B. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act Contract? No Impact. The project site is currently zoned as RM-4 (Multiple-family Residential).21 As indicated in the City’s Zoning Code, agricultural uses consisting of the growing of field crops, trees, vegetables, fruits, berries, and nursery stock are permitted within the RM-4 zone. However, the raising of animals for commercial purposes is not permitted within the RM-4 zone.22 The project’s implementation will require a Zoning Reclassification from RM-4 to RM-3.5 for consistency with the proposed General Plan designation of Mid Density Residential. The site is presently occupied by two single-family units and there are no ongoing agricultural activities located within either property. According to the California Department of Conservation Division of Land Resource Protection, the project site is not subject to a Williamson Act Contract.23 Thus, no impacts on existing Williamson Act Contracts or land zoned for agricultural use will result from the proposed project’s implementation and no mitigation is required. C. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section §12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section §4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section §51104(g))? No Impact. The western portion of the City of Anaheim and the project site are located in the midst of an urban area and no forest lands are located within the City. However, the eastern portion of the City is located adjacent to Chino Hills State Park as well as the Cleveland National Forest. The project’s construction will be restricted to the designated project site and will not extend into or otherwise affect the Chino Hills State Park or the Cleveland National Forest. Moreover, the project site is currently occupied by two single-family units and no timberland resources are located on-site. Therefore, no impacts on forest land or timber resources will result and no mitigation is required. D. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. No forest lands are located within the vicinity of the project site, which is in the western portion of the City. The eastern portion of the City is located adjacent to Chino Hills State Park and the Cleveland National Forest. The project’s construction will be restricted to the project site and will not extend into or otherwise affect the Chino Hills State Park or the Cleveland National Forest. As a result, no loss or conversion of forest lands will result from the proposed project’s implementation and no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. 21 City of Anaheim Zoning Map. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 22 City of Anaheim Municipal Code. Section 18.36.040.010. Site accessed April 19, 2018. 23 California Department of Conservation. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/WA/2012%20Statewide%20Map/WA_2012_8x11.pdf. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 36 E. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment that, due to their location or nature, may result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or the conversion of forest land to a non-forest use? No Impact. The project would not involve the disruption or damage of the existing environment that would result in a loss of farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use because the project site is not located in close proximity to forest land or farmland. As a result, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed project and no mitigation is required. 3.2.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Typically, agriculture and forestry impacts are site-specific. The analysis determined that there are no agricultural or forestry resources in the project area and that the implementation of the proposed project would not result in any impacts on these resources. As a result, no cumulative impacts on agriculture or forestry resources will occur and no mitigation is required of the proposed project. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 37 3.3 AIR QUALITY Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.3.A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X 3.3.B. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X 3.3.C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X 3.3.D. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X 3.3.E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X 3.3.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has established quantitative thresholds for short-term (construction) emissions and long-term (operational) emissions for the following criteria pollutants: ● Ozone (O3) is a nearly colorless gas that irritates the lungs, damages materials, and vegetation. Ozone is formed by photochemical reaction (when nitrogen dioxide is broken down by sunlight). ● Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless toxic gas that interferes with the transfer of oxygen to the brain and is produced by the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels emitted as vehicle exhaust. ● Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are a yellowish-brown gas, which at high levels can cause breathing difficulties. NOx is formed when nitric oxide (a pollutant from internal combustion processes) combines with oxygen. ● Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, pungent gas formed primarily by the combustion of sulfur- containing fossil fuels. Health effects include acute respiratory symptoms and difficulty in breathing for children. ● PM10 and PM2.5 refers to particulate matter less than ten microns and two and one-half microns in diameter, respectively. Particulates of this size cause a greater health risk than larger-sized particles since fine particles can more easily cause irritation. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 38 Projects in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) generating construction-related emissions that exceed any of the following emissions thresholds are considered to be significant under CEQA: ● 75 pounds per day of reactive organic compounds; ● 100 pounds per day of nitrogen oxides; ● 550 pounds per day of carbon monoxide; ● 150 pounds per day of PM10; ● 55 pounds per day of PM2.5; or, ● 150 pounds per day of sulfur oxides. A project would have a significant effect on air quality if any of the following operational emissions thresholds for criteria pollutants are exceeded: ● 55 pounds per day of reactive organic compounds; ● 55 pounds per day of nitrogen oxides; ● 550 pounds per day of carbon monoxide; ● 150 pounds per day of PM10; ● 55 pounds per day of PM2.5; or, ● 150 pounds per day of sulfur oxides. A. Would the project conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Anaheim is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which includes a 6,600 square-mile area within Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles County, Riverside County, and San Bernardino County. Air quality in the SCAB is monitored by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) at various monitoring stations located throughout the area.24 Measures to improve regional air quality are outlined in the SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP).25 The most recent 2016 AQMP was adopted in 2017 and was jointly prepared with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).26 The AQMP will help the SCAQMD maintain focus on the air quality impacts of major projects associated with goods movement, land use, energy efficiency, and other key areas of growth. Key elements of the 2016 AQMP include enhancements to existing programs to meet the 24- hour PM2.5 Federal health standard and a proposed plan of action to reduce ground-level ozone. The primary criteria pollutants that remain non-attainment in the local area include PM2.5 and Ozone. Specific criteria for determining a project’s conformity with the AQMP is defined in Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The Air Quality Handbook refers to the following criteria as a means to determine a project’s conformity with the AQMP:27 24 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final 2016 Air Quality Plan, Adopted March 10, 2017. 25 Ibid 26 Ibid. 27 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. April 1993. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 39 ● Consistency Criteria 1 refers to a proposed project’s potential for resulting in an increase in the frequency or severity of an existing air quality violation or its potential for contributing to the continuation of an existing air quality violation. ● Consistency Criteria 2 refers to a proposed project’s potential for exceeding the assumptions included in the AQMP or other regional growth projections relevant to the AQMP’s implementation.28 In terms of Criteria 1, the proposed project’s long-term (operational) airborne emissions will be below levels that the SCAQMD considers to be a significant impact (refer to the analysis included in the next section where the long-term stationary and mobile emissions for the proposed project are summarized in Table 3-2). The project would also conform to Consistency Criteria 2 since the project’s construction emissions would be below the thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD (the project’s construction emissions are summarized in Table 3-1). The proposed project would also conform to Consistency Criteria 2 since it would not exceed the housing, population, and employment assumptions presented in the 2016 AQMP. According to the AQMP, the SCAG region is projected to see a 12 percent growth in population, 16 percent growth in housing units, 23 percent growth in employment, and eight percent growth in vehicle miles traveled between 2012 and 2031. The SCAG region is expected to add two million new residents through the year 2031. Furthermore, the proposed project will not conflict with the regional population forecast presented in the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS prepared by SCAG. According to the RTP/SCS Demographics and Growth Forecast Appendix, the City of Anaheim is expected to add approximately 58,100 new residents through the year 2040.29 As indicated previously, the project site’s land use designation permits up to 18 du/acre. Therefore, if the site were developed according to the maximum allowable density, the site would be occupied by 14 units. These 14 units could support an estimated 47 residents. The build-out of the site was contemplated in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. However, the increase in density for this site has not been accounted for in the 2016 RTP since the City had originally designated the Craftsman unit located at 3534 West Savanna Street (the eastern portion of the project site) as a structure of historical interest.30 Nevertheless, the project site is located within the West Anaheim redevelopment project area. The City has identified this area for revitalization and additional infill opportunities in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. In addition, the project complies with the following general plan goals and policies calling for redevelopment of underutilized parcels: ● Facilitate new residential development on vacant or underutilized infill parcels. ● Promote the assembly of parcels to allow for more efficient development patterns wherever adjacent neighborhoods are not adversely impacted. 28 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. April 1993. 29 Southern California Association of Governments. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy 2016- 2040. Demographics & Growth Forecast. April 2016. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 30 City of Anaheim Planning Department. List of Historic Structures. List revised on June 14, 2016. List accessed on April 19, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 40 ● Preserve single-family neighborhoods and encourage residential development that promotes home ownership. The proposed project could add approximately 64 new residents based on the average household size of 3.38 persons per household identified in the 2010 census. The potential increase in population has not been accounted for by SCAG. However, the implementation of the proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies outlined in the Land Use Element and Housing Element. Furthermore, the approval of the project will assist the City in meeting their RHNA goal. In addition, the project’s operational emissions are well within the emissions projections identified in the 2016 AQMP. As shown in Table 3-5 of the Final 2016 AQMP, the future 2031 daily operational emissions with the estimated population, employment, and VMT growth projections are estimated to be: 345 tons per day of VOCs; 214 tons per day of NOx; 1,188 tons per day of CO; 18 tons per day of Sox; and 65 tons per day of PM2.5. The project’s operational emissions would be well within the emissions projections estimated in the AQMP. Since the proposed project would not be in violation of either Consistency Criteria, the project’s potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. B. Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less than Significant Impact. Construction Emissions. The entire construction period for the proposed project is expected to last for approximately 11 months to complete (refer to Section 2.4.3) and would include demolition, grading, site preparation, construction of the 19 new townhome units, and the finishing of the project (pavement areas, painting, and planting of landscaping). The analysis of daily construction and operational emissions was prepared utilizing the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod V.2016.3.2). The assumptions regarding the construction phases and the length of construction followed those identified herein in Section 2.4.3. As shown in Table 3-1, daily construction emissions are not anticipated to exceed the SCAQMD’s significance thresholds. Table 3-1 Estimated Daily Construction Emissions Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Demolition (on-site) 2.29 22.67 14.89 0.02 1.34 1.21 Demolition (off-site) 0.06 0.24 0.62 -- 0.15 0.04 Total Demolition 2.35 22.91 15.51 0.02 1.49 1.25 Site Preparation (on-site) 1.71 19.48 7.88 0.01 2.95 1.94 Site Preparation (off-site) 0.03 0.02 0.35 -- 0.09 0.02 Total Site Preparation 1.74 19.50 8.23 0.01 3.04 1.96 Grading (on-site) 1.41 16.03 6.60 0.01 2.52 1.64 Grading (off-site) 0.03 0.02 0.35 -- 0.09 0.02 Total Grading 1.44 16.05 6.95 0.01 2.61 1.66 Building Construction (on-site) 2.27 15.98 13.48 0.02 0.91 0.88 Building Construction (off-site) 0.08 0.28 0.72 -- 0.18 0.05 Total Building Construction 2.35 16.26 14.20 0.02 1.09 0.93 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 41 Table 3-1 Estimated Daily Construction Emissions Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Paving 0.91 9.17 8.90 0.01 0.52 0.48 Paving 0.06 0.04 0.58 -- 0.14 0.03 Total Paving 0.97 9.22 9.48 0.01 0.66 0.51 Architectural Coatings (on-site) 2.98 1.83 1.84 -- 0.12 0.12 Architectural Coatings (off-site) 0.01 0.01 0.13 -- 0.03 -- Total Architectural Coatings 2.99 1.84 1.97 -- 0.15 0.12 Maximum Daily Emissions 3.00 22.92 15.51 0.02 3.04 1.96 Daily Thresholds 75 100 55o 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod V.2016.3.2. (the worksheet are included herein in Appendix A) As indicated previously, the project site is located in a non-attainment area for ozone and particulates, the project will be required to adhere to all SCAQMD regulations related to fugitive dust generation and other construction-related emissions. According to SCAQMD Regulation 403, all unpaved demolition and construction areas shall be regularly watered up to three times per day during excavation, grading, and construction as required (depending on temperature, soil moisture, wind, etc.). Watering could reduce fugitive dust by as much as 55 percent. Rule 403 also requires that temporary dust covers be used on any piles of excavated or imported earth to reduce wind-blown dust. In addition, all clearing, earthmoving, or excavation activities must be discontinued during periods of high winds (i.e. greater than 15 mph), so as to prevent excessive amounts of fugitive dust. Finally, the contractors must comply with other SCAQMD regulations governing construction equipment idling and emissions controls. The aforementioned SCAQMD regulations are standard conditions required for every construction project undertaken in the City as well as in the cities and counties governed by the SCAQMD. Operational Emissions. The long-term air quality impacts associated with the proposed project include mobile emissions from vehicular traffic; area emissions from cleaning products and the operation of landscaping equipment; and off-site stationary emissions associated with the off-site energy generation and consumption (natural gas). The analysis of long-term operational impacts summarized in Table 3-2, also used the CalEEMod computer model developed for the SCAQMD. The analysis summarized in Table 3-2 indicates that the operational (long-term) emissions will be below the SCAQMD's daily emissions thresholds. Table 3-2 Estimated Operational Emissions in lbs/day Emission Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area-wide (lbs/day) 0.45 0.01 1.57 -- -- -- Energy (lbs/day) -- 0.08 0.03 -- -- -- Mobile (lbs/day) 0.11 0.14 1.46 -- 0.51 0.13 Total (lbs/day) 0.58 0.24 3.07 -- 0.52 0.15 Daily Thresholds 55 55 55o 15o 15o 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod V.2016.3.2. (the worksheet is included herein in Appendix A) CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 42 Since the cumulative air quality emissions are under the thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD, the potential air quality impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. C. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less than Significant Impact. Cumulative Emissions. According to the SCAQMD, a cumulative air pollution impact is an adverse health effect, risk, or nuisance from exposure to pollutants released into the air from multiple air pollution sources.31 The proposed project is residential in nature and no heavy trucks will be travelling to and from the site once the project is occupied. These trucks operate using diesel fuel, which produces diesel particulate matter (DPM). Future truck drivers visiting the site during the project’s construction must adhere to Title 13 - §2485 of the California Code of Regulations, which limits the idling of diesel powered vehicles to less than five minutes. Adherence to the aforementioned standard condition will minimize odor impacts from diesel trucks. In addition, the project’s construction contractors must adhere to SCAQMD Rule 403 regulations, which significantly reduce the generation of fugitive dust. Adherence to Rule 403 Regulations and Title 13 - §2485 of the California Code of Regulations will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant and no mitigation is required. D. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than Significant Impact. Most vehicles generate carbon monoxide (CO) as part of the tail-pipe emissions and high concentrations of CO along busy roadways and congested intersections are a concern. The areas surrounding the most congested intersections are often found to contain high levels of CO that exceed applicable standards and are referred to as hot-spots. Three variables influence the creation of a CO hot-spot: traffic volumes, traffic congestion, and the background CO concentrations for the source receptor area. Typically, a CO hot-spot may occur near a street intersection that is experiencing severe congestion (a LOS E or LOS F) where idling vehicles result in ground level concentrations of carbon monoxide. However, within the last decade, decreasing background levels of pollutant concentrations and more effective vehicle emission controls have significantly reduced the potential for the creation of hot-spots. The SCAQMD stated in its CEQA Handbook that a CO hot-spot would not likely develop at an intersection operating at LOS C or better. Since the Handbook was written, there have been new CO emissions controls added to vehicles and reformulated fuels are now sold in the SCAB. These new automobile emissions controls, along with the reformulated fuels, have resulted in a lowering of both ambient CO concentrations and vehicle emissions. 31 SCAQMD. White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/Environmental-Justice/cumulative-impacts-working-group/cumulative- impacts-white-paper.pdf. Report dated August 2003. Site accessed July 18, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 43 A Traffic Impact Study dated May 10, 2018 was prepared for the project by K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. (this report is provided in Appendix G). According to the study, it is estimated that the project would generate approximately 86 net new daily trips, with six net new trips during the morning (AM) peak hour and six net new trips during the evening (PM) peak hour.32 As noted in Section 3.16.2.A, the intersection of Savanna Street and Knott Avenue will continue to operate at a LOS A with the inclusion of the project’s traffic.33 Since the intersection of Savanna Street and Knott Avenue will continue to operate at a LOS A with the inclusion of the project, the likelihood of a CO hot-spot developing at this intersection is considered remote. Therefore, no impacts with respect to the creation of CO hot-spots will occur. Sensitive receptors refer to land uses and/or activities that are especially sensitive to poor air quality and typically include homes, schools, playgrounds, hospitals, convalescent homes, and other facilities where children or the elderly may congregate.34 These population groups are generally more sensitive to poor air quality. Sensitive receptors abut the project site to the east, west, and south and include both residential and non-residential sensitive receptors such as John Beat Park, located 600 feet to the northwest and the Park Anaheim Health Care Center, located 675 feet to the southeast. These nearby sensitive residential receptors are shown in Exhibit 3-1. The SCAQMD requires that CEQA air quality analyses indicate whether a proposed project will result in an exceedance of localized emissions thresholds or LSTs. LSTs only apply to short-term (construction) emissions at a fixed location and do not include off-site or area-wide emissions. The pollutants that are the focus of the LST analysis include the conversion of NOx to NO2; carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from construction; PM10 emissions from construction; and PM2.5 emissions from construction. For purposes of the LST analysis, the receptor distance used was 25 meters. Based on the analysis of LST impacts summarized above in Table 3-3, the potential impacts will be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Table 3-3 Local Significance Thresholds Exceedance SRA 17 for 1-Acre Sites (the site is 0.78 acres) Emissions Project Emissions (lbs/day) Type Allowable Emissions Threshold (lbs/day) and a Specified Distance from Receptor (in meters) 25 5o 100 200 500 NO2 22.92 Construction 81 83 98 123 192 CO 15.51 Construction 485 753 1,128 2,109 6,841 PM10 3.04 Construction 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 1.96 Construction 3 4 9 22 85 32 Refer to Table 3-12 in the Traffic Impact Analysis presented in Section 3.16. 33 Ibid. 34 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Appendix 9. As amended 2017. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 44 EXHIBIT 3-1 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS MAP SOURCE: QUANTUM GIS Project Site Park Anaheim Health Care Center John Beat Park CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 45 E. Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD has identified those land uses that are typically associated with odor complaints. These uses include activities involving livestock, rendering facilities, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting activities, refineries, landfills, and businesses involved in fiberglass molding.35 The project is a proposal to construct 19 townhome units. As designed, the proposed project will not be involved in any of the aforementioned odor-generating activities. Given the nature of the intended use (19 residential townhome units), no operational impacts related to odors are anticipated with the proposed project. Potential truck drivers visiting the site (construction and deliveries) must adhere to Title 13 - §2485 of the California Code of Regulations, which limits the idling of diesel powered vehicles to less than five minutes. Adherence to the aforementioned standard condition will minimize odor impacts from diesel trucks. In addition, the project’s construction contractors must adhere to SCAQMD Rule 403 regulations, which significantly reduce the generation of fugitive dust. Adherence to Rule 403 Regulations and Title 13 - §2485 of the California Code of Regulations will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant and no mitigation is required. 3.3.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Other developments approved by the City of Anaheim were also taken into consideration. Based on information published by the City’s Planning Department, there are three other development projects located within a five-mile radius affecting the study intersections. These three related projects are as follows: a 5,270 square feet medical office building specializing in outpatient care located at 3350 West Ball Road; a 2,558 square feet Taco Bell with Drive-Through located at 3270 West Lincoln Avenue; and a 22-unit single-family residential development located at 3319-3321 West Lincoln Avenue.36 The combined operational emissions from the proposed project and the three related projects will still be below the thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD (the CalEEMod worksheets for the cumulative emissions are provided in the Appendix). The four projects’ cumulative operational emissions are listed below. These emissions are compared to the thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD for the designated criteria pollutants. ● Reactive Organic Gasses (ROG). Estimated operational emissions: 4.53 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 55 pounds per day. ● Nitric Oxide (NOx). Estimated operational emissions: 13.58 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 55 pounds per day. ● Carbon Monoxide (CO). Estimated operational emissions: 27.10 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 550 pounds per day. 35 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Appendix 9. As amended 2017. 36 K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Study. Report dated February 22, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 46 ● Sulfur Dioxide (SO2). Estimated operational emissions: 0.07 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 150 pounds per day. ● Particulate Matter (PM10). Estimated operational emissions: 5.33 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 150 pounds per day. ● Particulate Matter (PM2.5). Estimated operational emissions: 1.56 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 55 pounds per day. As stated above, the cumulative emissions from the four related projects (including the proposed project) will be below the thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. As a result, less than significant cumulative air quality impacts will occur and no mitigation is required of the proposed project. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 47 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.4.A. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X 3.4.B. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X 3.4.C. Have a substantial adverse effect on Federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X 3.4.D. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory life corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X 3.4.E. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X 3.4.F. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? X 3.4.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. A review of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Biodiversity Database (CNDDB) Bios Viewer for the Anaheim Quadrangle indicated that out of a total of 25 native plant and animal species, six are either threatened or endangered. These species include the western yellow-billed cuckoo; the coastal California gnatcatcher; quino checkerspot butterfly; Gambel’s watercress; California black rail; and the Swainson’s hawk.37 The proposed project will not have an 37 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Bios Viewer. https://map.dfg.ca.gov/bios/?tool=cnddbQuick. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 48 impact on the aforementioned species since there is no suitable riparian or native habitat located within, or in the vicinity of, the project site. These species typically require wetland or riparian habitat with native vegetation and access to bodies of water. An additional search was conducted using the California Native Plant Society’s Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants to ascertain any rare or endangered plant species which may occur in the Anaheim Quadrangle. The search yielded five results. The following five plants have been identified in the Anaheim Quadrangle: southern tarplant, chaparral sand-verbena, Parish’s brittlescale, Coulter’s goldfields, and the San Bernardino aster.38 None of these plants were encountered during the site survey. As indicated previously, the only vegetation that is present on-site consists of non-native introduced species typically used as ornamental landscaping. As a result, no impacts on any candidate, sensitive, or special status species will result from development of the proposed project, and no mitigation is required. B. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The field survey indicated that there are no wetlands or riparian habitat present on-site or in the surrounding areas. This conclusion is also supported by a review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Mapper.39 In addition, there are no designated “blue line streams” located within the project area. As a result, no impacts on natural or riparian habitat will result from the proposed project’s implementation. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required. C. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on Federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. As indicated in the previous subsection, the project site and the adjacent developed properties do not contain any natural wetland and/or riparian habitat.40 As a result, the proposed project will not impact any protected wetland area or designated blue-line stream and no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. 38 California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program. 2018. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 39 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. https://www.fws.gov/Wetlands/data/Mapper.html. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 40 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 49 D. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory life corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The site is surrounded by development and lacks suitable riparian habitat.41 Furthermore, the site contains no natural hydrological features. Constant disturbance (noise and vibration) from vehicles travelling on the adjacent roadways limit the site’s utility as a migration corridor. However, the project will require the removal of all of the existing trees located on-site. Although the trees that will be removed would be replaced as part of the project’s landscaping plan, a mitigation measure is required to protect any potential nesting avian species that may be in the site’s trees that would be subject to removal: Mitigation Measure No. 1 (Biological Resources). Prior to issuance of any demolition or building permits, if clearing and/or construction activities would occur during the raptor or migratory bird nesting season (February 15 to August 15), the Applicant and/or its contractor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds up to 14 days before construction activities. The qualified biologist shall survey the construction zone and a 500-foot buffer surrounding the construction zone to determine whether the activities taking place have the potential to disturb or otherwise harm nesting birds. Surveys shall be repeated if project activities are suspended or delayed for more than 15 days during nesting season. If active nest(s) are identified during the preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall establish a 100-foot no- activity setback for migratory bird nests and a 250-foot setback for raptor nests. No ground disturbance should occur within the no-activity setback until the nest is deemed inactive by the qualified biologist. Details of compliance shall be provided in conjunction with or on plans submitted for permits. The above mitigation would reduce the impact to levels that are less than significant by ensuring there are no nesting birds present on-site should construction commence between the months of February and August. E. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less than Significant Impact. Chapter 13.12 –Street Trees serves as the City’s tree preservation ordinance. Trees located within the public right-of-way are considered property of the City. There is one street tree located along the south side of Savanna Street. This tree will likely be removed to accommodate the new driveway apron. Section 13.12.060 states that any street tree removed shall be replaced if a replacement is deemed possible. The replacement species shall be selected in accordance with the Official Tree Species List and Tree Master Plan. In addition, Section 13.12.080.020 will also apply. According to the aforementioned section, no person shall cut, trim, prune, plant, remove, spray, or in any other manner interfere with any street tree within the City of Anaheim without first having secured written permission from the Director of Community Services or his or her designee. Therefore, the project Applicant will also be required to obtain written permission from the Director of Community 41 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Site Survey. The site visit was conducted on April 5, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 50 Services prior to the removal of the street tree. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. F. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The proposed project will not impact an adopted or approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan because the proposed project is located in the midst of an urban area. The construction and operation of the proposed project will not affect any designated Orange County Significant Ecological Area (SEA) since the proposed development will be restricted to the project area. Therefore, no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. In addition, the project site is many miles west and will not affect the Chino Hills State Park or the Cleveland National Forest. 3.4.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Typically, impacts to biological resources are site-specific. The analysis determined that the proposed project will not involve any incremental loss or degradation of protected habitat. As a result, no cumulative impacts will occur and no mitigation is required of the proposed project. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 51 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.5.A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? X 3.5.B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? X 3.5.C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X 3.5.D. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X 3.5.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? Less than Significant Impact. Historic structures and sites are defined by local, State, and Federal criteria. A site or structure may be historically significant if it is locally protected through a local general plan or historic preservation ordinance. A site or structure may be historically significant according to State or Federal criteria even if the locality does not recognize such significance. The State, through the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), maintains an inventory of those sites and structures that are considered to be historically significant. Finally, the U.S. Department of Interior has established specific Federal guidelines and criteria that indicate the manner in which a site, structure, or district is to be defined as having historic significance and in the determination of its eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.42 To be considered eligible for the National Register, a property’s significance may be determined if the property is associated with events, activities, or developments that were important in the past, with the lives of people who were important in the past, or represents significant architectural, landscape, or engineering elements.43 State historic preservation regulations include the statutes and guidelines contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Public Resources Code (PRC). A historical resource includes, but is not limited to, any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript, that is historically or archaeologically significant. The State regulations that govern historic resources and structures include Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064.5(a) and 15064.5(b). According to Section 5024.1(c) of the State Public Resources Code: 42 U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. National Register of Historic Places. http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov. 2010. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 43 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 52 (c) A resource may be listed as an historical resource in the California Register if it meets any of the following National Register of Historic Places criteria: (1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage. (2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. In addition, California law protects Native American burials, skeletal remains, and associated grave goods regardless of the antiquity and provides for the sensitive treatment and disposition of those remains. CEQA, as codified at PRC Sections 21000 et seq., is the principal statute governing the environmental review of projects in the State. A Sacred Lands File Search was conducted for the project. The results of which came back negative (refer to the letter prepared by the NAHC which is shown in Appendix B). The City of Anaheim adopted a comprehensive Citywide Historic Preservation Plan in 2010. This plan was prepared for the City by Architectural Resources Group and was adopted by the City Council in May of 2010. Additionally, the City maintains a list of historic districts, structures within those districts, and structures of historical interest. The Craftsman style home located at 3534 West Savanna Street (the eastern portion of the project site) is listed as a structure of historical interest.44 Structures of Historical Interest includes properties outside of established historic districts that have been identified by interested individuals or groups, by City staff, through windshield survey, or through any other process that identifies groups of buildings or individual buildings for further study based on their age, building type, style, etc. The list is a tool for identifying potential historic districts and Historically Significant Structures, but it may also encourage preservation as it identifies any properties that are resources for understanding the City’s historic built environment. A building, structure, or object that is over fifty (50) years old and possesses sufficient historic integrity may be added to the list of Structures of Historical Interest with the approval of the Executive Director of the Community Development Department.45 The list consists of buildings that are a good example of an identifiable architectural style and buildings that are associated with the residential, institutional, industrial, or commercial development of Anaheim or the region. At the department’s discretion, structures of less than 50 years old may be added as well if they are exceptionally interesting or significant and merit tracking. Updates to the list will be approved by the Executive Director of the Community Development Department. 44 City of Anaheim Planning Department. List of Historic Structures. List revised on June 14, 2016. List accessed on April 19, 2018. 45 City of Anaheim Community Development Department. Citywide Historic Preservation Plan. Plan dated May 2010. Site accessed on April 19, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 53 Structures on this list may be eligible for certain City incentive programs to assist with their rehabilitation if they have the potential to become historically significant structures.46 Since the project site is occupied by a structure that is listed as a structure of historical interest, the Applicant will be required to undergo the demolition review process. The demolition review process has been established to preserve Anaheim’s cultural and architectural history. In order to comply with the demolition review process, the Applicant must perform the following tasks prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. File a 60-day “Notice of Intent to Demolish” application with the Anaheim Building Division. Once the application is received, it will be forwarded to the Historic Preservation program staff as well as appropriate organizations and interested individuals. 2. Post a “Notice of Intent to Demolish” on the property. 3. Offer the building to any individual or organization that would relocate and preserve it. Interested parties have 60 days from the posting date of the “Notice of Intent to Demolish” to develop a plan to preserve the structure either on site or at an appropriate new location. If no alternative is identified as being acceptable to the property owner after the 60-day notice period expires, a demolition permit may be issued. The aforementioned craftsman style unit that occupies the site is obsolete and performing the renovations necessary to improve the unit’s appearance as well as bring the unit up to current state and local building codes may affect the integrity of the building. Adherence to the City’s historic preservation guidelines will ensure potential impacts remain at levels that are less than significant. B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The City of Anaheim (and the greater Los Angeles Basin) was previously inhabited by the Gabrieleño-Kizh people, named after the San Gabriel Mission, and the Juaneno. The Gabrieleño-Kizh tribe has lived in this region for around 7,000 years.47 Before European contact, approximately 5,000 Gabrieleño-Kizh people lived in villages throughout the Los Angeles Basin.48 Archaeological sites are often located along creek areas, ridgelines, and vistas.49 A Sacred Lands File Search was conducted for the project on June 19, 2018. The results of which came back negative (refer to the letter prepared by the NAHC which is shown in Appendix B). Formal Native American consultation was provided in accordance with AB-52. AB-52 requires a lead agency to begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with 46 City of Anaheim Community Development Department. Citywide Historic Preservation Plan. Plan dated May 2010. Site accessed on April 19, 2018. 47 City of Anaheim Community Development Department. Citywide Historic Preservation Plan. Plan dated May 2010. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 48 Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Garden. Tongva Village Site. http://www.rsabg.org/tongva-village-site-1. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 49 McCawley. The First Angelinos, the Gabrieleño Indians of Los Angeles County. 1996. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 54 the geographic area of the proposed project, if the tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that geographic area and the tribe requests consultation. AB-52 consultation letters were sent to a total of 22 individuals presenting various branches of the Gabrieleño, Juaneño, Kumeyaay, and Serrano. The specific tribal contacts are included in Appendix B, which is provided under a separate cover. The tribal representative of the Gabrielino- Kizh indicated on July 18, 2018 that the project site is situated in an area of high archaeological significance. As a result, the following mitigation is required: Mitigation Measure No. 2 (Cultural Resources). Prior to issuance of any demolition or building permits, the project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor and archeologist during construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor(s) must be approved by the tribal representatives and will be present on-site during the construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed. The archeologist will monitor grading activities and must complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs completed by both the archaeologist and the tribal monitor must be submitted to the Planning Division on a weekly basis in order to determine compliance with the mitigation measure. In the unlikely event that remains are uncovered by construction crews, all excavation and grading activities shall be halted and the Anaheim Police Department would be contacted (the Department would then contact the County Coroner). This is a standard condition under California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b). Adherence to the abovementioned mitigation will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant since the tribal monitor would possess a level of familiarity of tribal resources that exceeds that of a typical archaeologist. C. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less than Significant Impact. There are no cemeteries located in the immediate area that would be affected by the proposed project. Forest Lawn Cemetery located 2.3 miles to the northwest in the City of Cypress is the closest cemetery to the project site.50 The proposed project is not likely to disturb any on-site burials due to the level of disturbance that has occurred in order to accommodate the former development. Notwithstanding, in the unlikely event that remains are uncovered by construction crews, all excavation and grading activities shall be halted and the Anaheim Police Department would be contacted (the Department would then contact the County Coroner). This is a standard condition under California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b), which states: 50 Google Earth. Site accessed April 19, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 55 “In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the coroner of the county in which the human remains are discovered has determined, in accordance with Chapter 10 (commencing with (b) Section 27460) of Part 3 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the Government Code, that the remains are not subject to the provisions of Section 27491 of the Government Code or any other related provisions of law concerning investigation of the circumstances, manner and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative, in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. The coroner shall make his or her determination within two working days from the time the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, notifies the coroner of the discovery or recognition of the human remains. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American, or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission.” In addition, Title 14; Chapter 3; Article 5; Section 15064.5 of CEQA would apply in terms of the identification of significant archaeological resources and their salvage. Therefore, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. D. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? No Impact. The project site is developed with two single-family units. As a result, there are no rock formations or other unique geological features present on-site. No paleontological resources or geologic features are anticipated to be encountered during the project’s construction phase due to the recent age (Holocene) of the soil. The soils that underlie the project area are alluvial soils. The alluvial deposits are typically quaternary-aged (from two million years ago to the present day) and span the two most recent geologic epochs, the Pleistocene and the Holocene.51 As a result, no impacts to paleontological resources will occur and no mitigation is required. 3.5.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The potential environmental impacts related to cultural resources are site-specific. Furthermore, the analysis herein determined that the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts on cultural resources. A Sacred Lands File Search was conducted for the project. The results from the Sacred Lands File Search came back negative. The City of Anaheim adopted a comprehensive Citywide Historic Preservation Plan in 2010. This plan was prepared for the City by Architectural Resources Group and was adopted by the City Council in May of 2010. Additionally, the City maintains a list of historic districts, structures within those districts, and structures of historical interest. The Craftsman style home located at 3534 West Savanna Street (the eastern portion of the project site) is listed as a 51 United States Geological Survey. What is the Quaternary? http://geomaps.wr.usgs.gov/sfgeo/quaternary/stories/what_is.html. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 56 structure of historical interest.52 Since the project site is occupied by a structure that is listed as a structure of historical interest, the Applicant will be required to undergo the demolition review process. The demolition review process has been established to preserve Anaheim’s cultural and architectural history. In order to comply with the demolition review process, the Applicant must perform the following tasks prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. File a 60-day “Notice of Intent to Demolish” application with the Anaheim Building Division. Once the application is received, it will be forwarded to the Historic Preservation program staff as well as appropriate organizations and interested individuals. 2. Post a “Notice of Intent to Demolish” on the property. 3. Offer the building to any individual or organization that would relocate and preserve it. Interested parties have 60 days from the posting date of the “Notice of Intent to Demolish” to develop a plan to preserve the structure either on site or at an appropriate new location. If no alternative is identified as being acceptable to the property owner after the 60-day notice period expires, a demolition permit may be issued. The aforementioned craftsman style unit that occupies the site is obsolete and performing the renovations necessary to improve the unit’s appearance as well as bring the unit up to current state and local building codes may affect the integrity of the building. As a result, no cumulative impacts will occur and no additional mitigation is required of the proposed project. 52 City of Anaheim Planning Department. List of Historic Structures. List revised on June 14, 2016. List accessed on April 19, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 57 3.6 GEOLOGY & SOILS Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.6.A. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: . Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. . Strong seismic ground–shaking? . Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? . Landslides? X 3.6.B. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X 3.6.C Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X 3.6.D. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (2010), creating substantial risks to life or property? X 3.6.E. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X 3.6.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Strong seismic ground–shaking? Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Landslides? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The City of Anaheim is located in a seismically active region. Earthquakes from several active and potentially active faults in the Southern California region could affect the project site. In 1972, the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Zoning Act was passed in response to the damage sustained in the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake.53 The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act's main purpose is to prevent the construction of buildings used for human occupancy on the surface trace of active faults.54 A list of cities and counties subject to the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake 53 California Department of Conservation. What is the Alquist-Priolo Act. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/ap/Pages/main.aspx. Site accessed on April 19, 2018 54 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 58 Fault Zones is available on the State’s Department of Conservation website. The City of Anaheim is not on the list.55 As a result, there are no known faults located within the City’s corporate boundaries that may be subject to a fault rupture hazard. A preliminary geotechnical investigation dated October 8, 2017 was prepared for the project by Strata- Tech, Inc (this study is presented in Appendix C, which is provided on a separate cover). According to the report, the nearest fault is the Coyote Hills Fault, located approximately 5.1 miles to the north. The Newport-Inglewood located six miles to the southwest and the Whittier-Elsinore Fault 14 miles to the north are considered causative with regard to seismicity at the site. In addition, the Elysian Park Thrust fault is located within two miles north east from the site. The principal seismic hazard to the subject property and proposed project is strong ground shaking from earthquakes produced by local faults. It is likely that the subject property will be shaken by future earthquakes produced in Southern California. Secondary effects such as surface rupture, lurching, lateral spread or flooding are not considered probable.56 Surface ruptures are visible instances of horizontal or vertical displacement, or a combination of the two. The proposed project will be constructed in compliance with the 2016 Building Code, which contains standards for building design to minimize the impacts from fault rupture. Therefore, the potential impacts resulting from fault rupture are anticipated to be less than significant. The potential impacts in regards to ground shaking would also be considered to be less than significant. The intensity of ground shaking depends on the intensity of the earthquake, the duration of shaking, soil conditions, type of building, and distance from epicenter or fault. The proposed project will be constructed in compliance with the 2016 Building Code, which contains standards for building design to minimize the impacts from ground shaking. Other potential seismic issues include ground failure and liquefaction. Ground failure is the loss in stability of the ground and includes landslides, liquefaction, and lateral spreading. The project site is located in an area that is subject to liquefaction (refer to Exhibit 3-2). According to the United States Geological Survey, liquefaction is the process by which water-saturated sediment temporarily loses strength and acts as a fluid. Essentially, liquefaction is the process by which the ground soil loses strength due to an increase in water pressure following seismic activity. Even though the site is located within an area that is subject to liquefaction, the liquefaction potential for the project site is considered to be low.57 Nevertheless, the following recommendation was provided in the Geotechnical Report prepared by Strata-Tech, Inc:58 Mitigation Measure No. 3 (Geology & Soils). The project must comply with all the design and construction-related actions in the site specific Geotechnical Report prepared by Strata-Tech. These design requirements will be confirmed by the City Engineer during the final plan check prior to the issuance of any building permit. In addition, the Applicant must remove and re-compact the 55 California Department of Conservation. Table 4, Cities and Counties Affected by Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones as of January 2010. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/ap/Pages/affected.aspx. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 56 Strata-Tech, Inc. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation. Report dated October 8, 2017. 57 Ibid. 58 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 59 underlying soils and provide additional slab and foundation support in order to address potential liquefaction risks. The removal and re-compaction of the underyling soil will be confirmed by the building inspector, the City Engineer, and a representative of Strata-Tech prior to the framing phase of the project’s construction. The recommendations and requirements of the Strata-Tech study must be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Implementation of the above-mentioned mitigation will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant. Lastly, the project site is not subject to the risk of landslides (refer to Exhibit 3-2) because there are no hills or mountains within the vicinity of the project site. Lateral spreading is a phenomenon that is characterized by the horizontal, or lateral, movement of the ground. Lateral spreading could be liquefaction-induced or can be the result of excess moisture within the underlying soils. Liquefaction induced lateral spreading would not affect the proposed development because the project must be in compliance with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, which identifies building standards for seismic-related construction requirements that have been promulgated by the State of California. Therefore, lateral spreading caused by liquefaction would not affect the project. The underlying soils are not prone to shrinking and swelling (refer to Section 3.6.2.D). As a result, the potential impacts in regards to liquefaction and landslides are less than significant and no additional mitigation is required. B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant Impact. A preliminary geotechnical investigation dated October 8, 2017 was prepared for the project by Strata-Tech, Inc. (this study is presented in Appendix C, which is provided on a separate cover). According to the report, artificial fill soils were encountered in sample borings between one to three feet below ground surface (BGS).59 Native soils consisted of clean to silty, fine grained sand, sandy, clayey silt, and silty, sandy clay to the maximum depth explored, 50 feet.60 The site is, and will continue to be level and no slope failure or landslide impacts are anticipated to occur. Once operational, the project site would be paved over and landscaped, which would minimize soil erosion. In addition, the Applicant will be required to adhere to the construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. Stormwater Runoff Program which includes the City of Anaheim. This program includes the County of Orange, the cities of Orange County, and the Orange County Flood Control District. The construction BMPs identified in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual are applicable for all projects located within Orange County.61 These construction BMPs are grouped into the following categories: ● Erosion control, which focuses on preventing soil from being eroded by stormwater and potentially discharged from the construction site; 59 Strata-Tech, Inc. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation. Report dated October 8, 2017. 60 Ibid. 61 Orange County Public Works. Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. Report dated December 2012 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 60 EXHIBIT 3-2 SEISMIC HAZARDS MAP SOURCE: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION No r t h Project Site CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 61 ● Sediment control, which focuses on preventing eroded soil from being discharged from the construction site; ● Wind erosion control, which protects the soil surface and prevents the soil particles from being detached by wind; ● Tracking control, which prevents or reduces the amount of sediment that is tracked to paved areas from unpaved areas by vehicles or construction equipment; ● Non-stormwater management, which limits or reduces potential pollutants at their source before they are exposed to stormwater; and, ● Waste management and materials pollution control, which practices that limit or reduce or prevent the contamination of stormwater by construction wastes and materials.62 The City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program coordinator and inspector is responsible for ensuring compliance with the County requirements. As a result, the potential impacts regarding soil erosion are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. C. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. As indicated previously, artificial fill soils were encountered in sample borings between one to three feet below ground surface (BGS).63 Native soils consisted of clean to silty, fine grained sand, sandy, clayey silt, and silty, sandy clay to the maximum depth explored, 50 feet.64 The underlying soils are not capable of supporting the proposed project. Therefore, the project Applicant will be required to adhere to the mitigation measure presented in subsection 3.6.2.A. The site is, and will continue to be level and no slope failure or landslide impacts are anticipated to occur. Once operational, the project site will be paved over and landscaped, which will minimize soil erosion. Furthermore, no soil erosion will occur during the project’s construction since the project Applicant will be required to adhere to the construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the County’s Construction Runoff Guidance Manual, which are applicable for all projects located within Orange County. Lateral spreading is a phenomenon that is characterized by the horizontal, or lateral, movement of the ground. Lateral spreading could be liquefaction induced or can be the result of excess moisture within the underlying soils. 62 Strata-Tech, Inc. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation. Report dated October 8, 2017. 63 Ibid. 64 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 62 Liquefaction induced lateral spreading will not affect the proposed residential development because the project will be constructed in compliance with all pertinent State Building Code regulations. In addition, the mitigation provided in subsection 3.6.2.A will address potential impacts related to liquefaction. As stated in the geotechnical report, the near surface soils have a low to very low expansion potential. Soils that exhibit certain shrink swell characteristics become sticky when wet and expand according to the moisture content present at the time. Since the soils have a low shrink-swell potential, lateral spreading resulting from an influx of groundwater is unlikely and the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant. In addition, the project’s implementation will not require significant grading and excavation (grading will extend not more than three feet below ground water (BGS) surface). Therefore, the likelihood of encountering groundwater is considered to be less than significant. Groundwater was encountered in the borings at approximately 16.5 feet.65 The soils that underlie the project site are not prone to subsidence. Subsidence occurs via soil shrinkage and is triggered by a significant reduction in an underlying groundwater table, thus causing the earth on top to sink.66 No groundwater will be drained to accommodate the construction of the proposed project. In addition, the project will not result in the direct extraction of groundwater located below ground surface (BGS). Therefore, the likelihood of on- site subsidence is considered to be remote. As a result, the potential impacts are anticipated to be less than significant with the implementation of the mitigation identified in the previous subsection and no additional mitigation is required. D. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less than Significant Impact. The near surface soils have a low to very low expansion potential.67 The mitigation presented throughout this Section (3.6) will minimize potential seismic impacts. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. E. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. No septic tanks will be used as part of proposed project. However, septic tanks may be present on-site due to the age of the existing structures. Any potential septic tanks located BGS will be removed. The project will be connected to the existing sanitary sewer system. As a result, no impacts associated with the use of septic tanks will occur as part of the proposed project’s implementation and no mitigation is required. 65 Strata-Tech, Inc. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation. Report dated October 8, 2017. 66 Subsidence Support. What Causes House Subsidence? http://www.subsidencesupport.co.uk/what-causes-subsidence.html. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 67 Strata-Tech, Inc. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation. Report dated October 8, 2017. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 63 3.6.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Typically, impacts to geology and soils are site-specific. The analysis herein determined that the proposed project would not result in significant impacts related to ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, soil erosion, lateral spreading, or subsidence. As a result, no cumulative impacts will occur and no mitigation is required for the proposed project. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 64 3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.7.A. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X 3.7.B. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X 3.7.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS A. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less than Significant Impact. The State of California requires CEQA documents to include an evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, or gases that trap heat in the atmosphere. GHG are emitted by both natural processes and human activities. Examples of GHG that are produced both by natural and industrial processes include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The accumulation of GHG in the atmosphere regulates the earth's temperature. Without these natural GHG, the Earth's surface would be about 61°F cooler.68 However, emissions from fossil fuel combustion have elevated the concentrations of GHG in the atmosphere to above natural levels. The SCAQMD has established multiple draft thresholds of significance. These thresholds include 1,400 metric tons of CO2E (MTCO2E) per year for commercial projects, 3,000 MTCO2E per year for residential projects. Table 3-5 summarizes annual greenhouse gas (CO2E) emissions from the proposed project. Carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO2E, is a term that is used for describing different greenhouses gases in a common and collective unit. As indicated in Table 3-5, the CO2E total for the project is 171 MTCO2E, which is below the aforementioned thresholds. The project’s construction would result in a generation of 190 MTCO2E per year. When amortized over a 30 year period, these emissions decrease to 6.34 MTCO2E per year. These amortized construction emissions were added to the project’s operational emissions to calculate the project’s true GHG emissions. As shown in the table, the project’s total operational emissions would be 177 MTCO2E per year, which is still below the threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E per year for residential projects. The aforementioned estimate of operational GHG emissions do not take into account the two single family residences that occupy the site. When taking the existing two residences into account, the net increase in GHG emissions will be less. 68 California, State of. OPR Technical Advisory – CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review. June 19, 2008. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 65 Table 3-5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Source GHG Emissions (Tons/Year) CO2 CH4 N2O CO2E Long-Term – Area Emissions 0.32 -- -- 0.32 Long-Term - Energy Emissions 84.66 -- -- 84.87 Long-Term - Mobile Emissions 65.32 -- -- 65.41 Long-Term - Waste Emissions 1.77 0.10 -- 4.39 Long-Term – Water Emissions 15.41 0.03 -- 16.46 Long-Term - Total Emissions 167.49 0.14 -- 171.48 Total Construction Emissions 189.32 0.03 -- 190.32 Construction Emissions Amortized Over 30 Years 6.34 Total Operational Emissions with Amortized Construction Emissions 177.82 MTCO2E Significance Threshold 3,000 MTCO2E Source: CalEEMod.V.2016.3.2 (the worksheet is included herein in Appendix A) The GHG emissions estimates reflect what a 19-unit townhome of the same location and description would generate once fully operational. The type of activities that may be undertaken once the project is operational have been predicted and accounted for in the model for the selected land use type. It is important to note that the project is an “infill” development, which is seen as an important strategy in combating the release of GHG emissions. Infill development provides a regional benefit in terms of a reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) since the project is consistent with the regional and State sustainable growth objectives identified in the State’s Strategic Growth Council (SGC).69 Infill development reduces VMT by recycling existing undeveloped or underutilized properties located in established urban areas. When development is located in a more rural setting, such as further east in the desert areas, employees, patrons, visitors, and residents may have to travel farther since rural development is often located a significant distance from employment, entertainment, and population centers. Consequently, this distance is reduced when development is located in urban areas since employment, entertainment, and population centers tend to be set in more established communities. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. B. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD has established multiple draft thresholds of significance. These thresholds include 1,400 metric tons of CO2E (MTCO2E) per year for commercial projects, 3,500 69 California Strategic Growth Council. http://www.sgc.ca.gov/Initiatives/infill-development.html. Promoting and enabling sustainable infill development is a principal objective of the SGC because of its consistency with the State Planning Priorities and because infill furthers many of the goals of all of the Council’s member agencies. Site accessed on April 20, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 66 MTCO2E per year for residential projects, 3,000 MTCO2E per year for mixed-use projects, and 7,000 MTCO2E per year for industrial projects. In addition, an initial threshold of 10,000 MTCO2E per year for industrial projects was established in 2008. As shown in Table 3-5, the project’s construction would result in a generation of 190 MTCO2E per year. When amortized over a 30 year period, these emissions decrease to 6.34 MTCO2E per year. These amortized construction emissions were added to the project’s operational emissions to calculate the project’s true GHG emissions. As shown in the table, the project’s total operational emissions would be 177 MTCO2E per year, which is still below the threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E per year for residential projects. The City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department prepared a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan dated July 2015 that identifies steps residents and business owners can take to reduce their GHG emissions. The proposed project will be consistent with the following solutions: ● Replace older appliances, electronics and lighting with ENERGY STAR compliant devices. The project’s implementation will be constructed in accordance with Title 24 of California Code of Regulations as well as the California Green Building Code. ● Use energy-saver light bulbs, such as compact fluorescents or LED Bulbs. The project’s implementation will be constructed in accordance with Title 24 of California Code of Regulations as well as the California Green Building Code. ● Upgrade heating and cooling systems with energy efficient systems, including a programmable thermostat. The project’s implementation will be constructed in accordance with Title 24 of California Code of Regulations as well as the California Green Building Code. ● Plant drought tolerant trees and landscaping in the yard to shade your home and provide significant energy savings. The project will include drought tolerant landscaping pursuant to the City’s landscaping requirements. In addition, the Green Element of the General Plan contains numerous policies aimed at reducing GHG emissions. The proposed project will be consistent with the following policies: ● Ensure compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act requirements for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, including developing and requiring the development of Water Quality Management Plans for all new development and significant redevelopment in the City. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan dated May 29, 2018 and a Preliminary Hydrology & Hydraulics Study dated May 29, 2018 were prepared for the project by DMS Consultants, Inc. pursuant to Title 10 of the City’s Municipal Code (these reports are provided in Appendix D). According to the Hydrology Report and WQMP, the project will include the use of a StormTech MC-3500 stormwater chamber, catch basins, permeable pavers, and two hydrodynamic separators.70 These post-construction BMPs will filter out contaminants of concern, allow runoff to percolate into the ground, and will also result in the controlled discharge of excess runoff off-site. 70 DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Study. Report dated May 29, 2018; and, DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Report dated May 29, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 67 ● Require new development and significant redevelopment to utilize site preparation, grading and best management practices that provide erosion and sediment control to prevent construction-related contaminants from leaving the site and polluting waterways. The discharge of contaminated runoff from construction will be minimized since the Applicant will be required to adhere to the construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. The construction BMPs identified in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual are applicable for all projects located within Orange County.71 The project Applicant would also be required to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) pursuant to General Construction Activity NPDES regulations since the project would connect to the City’s MS4. The SWPPP would contain additional construction BMPs that would be the responsibility of the project Applicant to implement. Furthermore, the Applicant would also be required to submit a Notice of Intent to comply with the General Construction Activity NPDES Permit to the State Water Resources Control Board. ● Regulate construction practices, including grading, dust suppression, chemical management, and encourage pre-determined construction routes that minimize dust and particulate matter pollution. The project’s contractors will be required to adhere to SCAQMD Rule 403 regulations, which govern the release and mitigation of fugitive dust. As indicated previously, the operation of the proposed project will result in an incremental increase in GHG emissions though these operational GHG emissions will be below SCAQMD thresholds of significance. The proposed project will result in the generation of 177 MTCO2E per year. The proposed project will not introduce any conflicts with adopted initiatives that are designed to control future GHG emissions. The project is an “infill development” and is seen as an important strategy in reducing regional GHG emissions. As a result, the impacts related to conflicts with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 3.7.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS As indicated in the preceding analysis, the project’s GHG emissions are below thresholds considered to represent a significant impact. 71 Orange County Public Works. Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. Report dated December 2012. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 68 3.8 HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.8.A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X 3.8.B. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X 3.8.C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X 3.8.D. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X 3.8.E. For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X 3.8.F. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X 3.8.G. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X 3.8.H. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X 3.8.I. Would the project include a new or retrofitted stormwater treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g., water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment wetlands, etc.), the operation of which could result in significant environmental effects (e.g., increased vectors and noxious odors) X 3.8.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less than Significant Impact. The project site is not located on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List Site Cleanup (Cortese List).72 In 72 CalEPA. DTSC’s Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup (Cortese List). http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 69 addition, the project site is not identified on any Leaking Underground Storage Tank database (LUST).73 A search through the California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s Envirostor database indicated that the project site was not included on any Federal or State clean up or Superfund lists.74 The United States Environmental Protection Agency’s multi-system search was consulted to determine whether the project site is identified on any Federal Brownfield list; Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) List; Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Treatment, Storage, and Disposal (TSD) Facilities List; and/or Federal RCRA Generators List. The project site was not identified on any of the aforementioned lists.75 The project’s construction will require the use of diesel fuel to power the construction equipment. The diesel fuel would be properly sealed in tanks and would be transported to the site by truck. No other hazardous materials would be used during the project’s construction phase. Due to the nature of the proposed project (a 19-unit townhome development), no hazardous materials beyond what is typically used in a household setting for routine cleaning and maintenance would be used once the project is occupied. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. B. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. In order to accommodate the construction of the project, the Applicant must demolish the existing buildings that occupy the site. Lead based paint and asbestos containing materials may be present in the flooring, walls, roof materials, dry wall, etc. due to the age of the buildings present on-site. In addition, septic tanks may be present on-site due to the age of the existing single-family units. Any septic tanks encountered on-site may have the potential to leak if not properly handled. As a result, the project’s contractors must be familiar with SCAQMD Rule 1166 (Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Decontamination of Soil) and SCAQMD Rule 1403 (Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities). Furthermore, the following mitigation is required: Mitigation Measure No. 4 (Hazards & Hazardous Materials). The Applicant, and the contractors, must adhere to all requirements governing the handling, removal, and disposal of asbestos-containing materials, lead paint, underground septic tanks, and other hazardous substances and materials that may be encountered during demolition and land clearance activities. The City’s Inspector will ensure compliance by inspecting the site during the demolition phase. Any contamination encountered during the demolition, grading, and/or site preparation activities must also be removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable laws prior to the issuance of any building permit. 73 California State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=anaheim,ca. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 74 CalEPA. Envirostor. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/mapfull.asp?global_id=&x=- 119&y=37&zl=18&ms=640,480&mt=m&findaddress=True&city=anaheim. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 75 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Multisystem Search. Site accessed April 20, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 70 Due to the nature of the proposed project (a 19-unit townhome development), no hazardous materials will be used on-site beyond those which are used for routine cleaning and maintenance. The project’s construction will require the use of diesel fuel to power the construction equipment. The diesel fuel will be properly sealed in tanks and will be transported to the site by truck. No other hazardous materials will be used during the project’s construction phase. Therefore, the project’s implementation will result in less than significant impact with mitigation. C. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. There is one school located within one-quarter of a mile from the project site. Ronda Rae Preschool is located approximately 600 feet southeast of the project site. The Applicant will remove all of the buildings located within the project site. During these activities, lead and/or asbestos containing materials may be encountered. The handling, removal, and disposal of the aforementioned items are governed by State and Federal regulations. In addition, the project’s contractors must be familiar with SCAQMD Rule 1166 and Rule 1403. Due to the nature of the proposed project (a 19-unit townhome development), no hazardous materials beyond what is typically used in a household setting for cleaning and maintenance would be used once the project is occupied. The project will not require the use of chemicals or materials that require oversight of Department of Toxic Substances Control, Environmental Protection Agency, Fire Department, SCAQMD, or Regional Water Quality Control Board. The existing single-family units that occupy the site likely contain lead based paint or asbestos containing materials. Since the implementation of the proposed project will require the demolition of these existing units, asbestos and lead may be encountered during demolition. Therefore, SCAQMD Rule 1403-Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities will also apply. In addition, the mitigation presented in the previous subsection will also be required. Adherence to the mitigation identified in the previous subsection will ensure impacts remain at levels that are less than significant. Therefore, the project’s implementation will result in less than significant impact with mitigation. D. Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. The “Cortese List,” also referred to as the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List or the California Superfund List, is a planning document used by the State and other local agencies to comply with CEQA requirements that require the provision of information regarding the location of hazardous materials release sites. California Government Code section 65962.5 requires the California Environmental Protection Agency to develop and update the Cortese List on annually basis. The list is maintained as part of the DTSC's Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program referred to as EnviroStor. A search of the Envirostor Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List website was completed to identify whether the project site is listed in the database as a Cortese site. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 71 The site was not identified on the list.76 Therefore, no impacts will result with the implementation of the proposed project and no mitigation is required. E. For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Less than Significant Impact. The project site is located within two miles of the Joint Forces Joint Forces Training Base in Los Alamitos.77 The project site is located within the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ), the FAR Part 77 zone, and height restriction zone for the Joint Forces Training Base.78 The proposed townhome units will have a maximum height of less than 37 feet. Therefore, the proposed project will not penetrate the airport’s 100:1 slope. Essentially, the proposed project will not introduce a building that will interfere with the approach and take off of airplanes utilizing the aforementioned airport. Furthermore, the project site is not located within the aforementioned airport’s 60 Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) boundaries. The proposed project will be 36 feet in height and will be exempt from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) lighting requirements per FAA AC 70/7460-1L – Obstruction Marking and Lighting with Change. According to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) tower lighting requirements, all structures exceeding 200 feet above ground level (AGL) must be appropriately marked with tower lights or tower paint. In addition, the Federal Communications Commission governs monitoring requirements. As a result, the proposed project will not present a safety or noise hazard related to aircraft or airport operations at a public use airport to people residing or working in the project area. Therefore, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. F. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The project site is not located within two miles of a private use airport or helipad. Therefore, no impacts will result with the implementation of the proposed project and no mitigation is required. G. Would the project impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. At no time will Savanna Street be completely closed to traffic. All construction staging must occur within the project area. As a result, no impacts are associated with the proposed project’s implementation and no mitigation is required. 76 CalEPA. DTSC’s Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - Site Cleanup (Cortese List). http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 77 Toll-Free Airline. Orange County Public and Private Airports, California. http://www.tollfreeairline.com/california/losangeles.htm. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 78 Orange County Airport Land Use Commission. Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Joint Forces Training Base, Los Alamitos. Amended 2015. http://www.ocair.com/commissions/aluc/archive/2015/2015-07-16/item1.pdf. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 72 H. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wild lands fire, including where wild lands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wild lands? No Impact. As indicated previously, the project site and the adjacent properties are urbanized and there are no areas of native or natural vegetation found within the vicinity of the project area. The project site is located outside of the City’s WildFire Protection Area, or any areas where there is natural vegetation that may represent a significant wildfire risk.79 As a result, no risk from wildfire is anticipated with the approval and subsequent implementation of the proposed project and no impacts will occur. I. Would the project include a new or retrofitted stormwater treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g., water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment wetlands, etc.), the operation of which could result in significant environmental effects (e.g., increased vectors and noxious odors)? Less than Significant Impact. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan dated May 29, 2018 and a Preliminary Hydrology & Hydraulics Study dated May 29, 2018 were prepared for the project by DMS Consultants, Inc. pursuant to Title 10 of the City’s Municipal Code (these reports are provided in Appendix D). According to the Hydrology Report and WQMP, the project will include the use of a StormTech MC-3500 stormwater chamber, catch basins, permeable pavers, and two hydrodynamic separators.80 The Stormtech MC-3500 stormwater chamber will be installed below-ground surface (BGS). This chamber consists of a polypropylene corrugated chamber (resembling a tube-like structure), impermeable liners, and a stone bottom.81 Other BMPs include Eco-Stone Permeable Pavers and hydrodynamic separators. The Eco-Stone Permeable Pavers allow surface runoff to percolate through small openings, where surface runoff will be filtered via a crushed gravel base. Lastly, excess surface runoff that accumulates within the landscaped areas will drain into yard drain inlets. From there, runoff will be conveyed to the hydrodynamic separators via new six-inch storm drains.82 Runoff processed by the hydrodynamic separators will pass through filter screens which will remove trash and debris. This filter screen will also allow sediment to be removed and sink to the bottom of the separators in special sediment chambers. Filtered runoff will then be expelled from the separators through an outlet pipe. The operation of the aforementioned BMPs will not result in significant environmental effects such as increased vectors or odors since the WQMP includes maintenance guidelines for every BMP recommended in the Plan. Adherence to the maintenance instructions outlined in the WQMP will ensure that no impacts regarding vectors or odors will occur. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 79 City of Anaheim General Plan. Figure S-5-Fire Protection Areas Map. Plan adopted May 2004. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 80 DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Report dated May 29, 2018. 81 Ibid. 82 DMS Consultants, Inc. WQMP Plot Plan. Plan dated April 2, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 73 3.8.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The potential impacts related to hazardous materials are site specific. Furthermore, the analysis herein also determined that the implementation of the proposed project will not result in any significant impacts related to hazards and/or hazardous materials. As a result, no significant cumulative impacts related to hazards or hazardous materials will result from the proposed project’s implementation and no additional mitigation is required relative to cumulative hazards. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 74 3.9 HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.9.A. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X 3.9.B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X 3.9.C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? X 3.9.D. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X 3.9.E. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X 3.9.F. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X 3.9.G. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X 3.9.H. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X 3.9.I. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X 3.9.J. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X 3.9.K. Substantially degrade water quality by contributing pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling, or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? X 3.9.L. Substantially degrade water quality by discharge which affects the beneficial uses (i.e., swimming, fishing, etc.) of the receiving or downstream waters? X CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 75 Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.9.M. Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? X 3.9.N. Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post- construction activities? X 3.9.O. Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? X 3.9.P. Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? X 3.9.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less than Significant Impact. The project’s construction and subsequent occupation will not violate any water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, or otherwise degrade surface or groundwater quality. Construction activities such as site preparation and grading may have the potential to result in the discharge of sediment, oils, residual diesel fuel, rubbish, or other contaminants of concern into the local streets and/or stormwater infrastructure. The discharge of contaminated runoff from construction will be minimized since the Applicant will be required to adhere to the construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. The construction BMPs identified in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual are applicable for all projects located within Orange County.83 These construction BMPs are grouped into the following categories: ● Erosion control, which focuses on preventing soil from being eroded by stormwater and potentially discharged from the construction site; ● Sediment control, which focuses on preventing eroded soil from being discharged from the construction site; ● Wind erosion control, which protects the soil surface and prevents the soil particles from being detached by wind; ● Tracking control, which prevents or reduces the amount of sediment that is tracked to paved areas from unpaved areas by vehicles or construction equipment; 83 Orange County Public Works. Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. Report dated December 2012. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 76 ● Non-stormwater management, which limits or reduces potential pollutants at their source before they are exposed to stormwater; and, ● Waste management and materials pollution control, which practices that limit or reduce or prevent the contamination of stormwater by construction wastes and materials.84 The City’s NPDES program coordinator and inspector is responsible for ensuring compliance with the County requirements. As a result, the potential construction impacts are considered to be less than significant and no separate mitigation is required. The project Applicant would also be required to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) pursuant to General Construction Activity NPDES regulations since the project would connect to the City’s MS4. The SWPPP would contain additional construction BMPs that would be the responsibility of the project Applicant to implement. Furthermore, the applicant would also be required to submit a Notice of Intent to comply with the General Construction Activity NPDES Permit to the State Water Resources Control Board. Title 10–Public Services and Utilities, Chapter 10.09–National Pollution Discharge Elimination System of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code regulates the discharge of stormwater within the City. This code regulates facility operations of development and redevelopment projects to comply with the current “Municipal NPDES” permit requirements. According to the aforementioned code section, an Applicant is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prior to the issuance of a grading permit, building permit and/or conditional use permit for any new development or significant redevelopment. The mandatory WQMP must include Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Treatment Control BMPs. Inclusion of the post-construction BMPs identified in the mandatory WQMP will filter out contaminants of concern (oil, grease, debris, leaves, etc). Once constructed, the project will not introduce polluted runoff into the existing storm drain system. In addition, the project will not create excess runoff that will exceed the capacity of the existing storm water drainage system. The project site in its current state is dominated by pervious surfaces. Following construction, the percentage of pervious surfaces on-site will be 31 percent. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan dated May 29, 2018 and a Preliminary Hydrology & Hydraulics Study dated May 29, 2018 were prepared for the project by DMS Consultants, Inc. pursuant to Title 10 of the City’s Municipal Code (these reports are provided in Appendix D). According to the Hydrology Report and WQMP, the project will include the use of a StormTech MC-3500 stormwater chamber, catch basins, permeable pavers, and two hydrodynamic separators.85 The Stormtech MC- 3500 stormwater chamber will be installed below-ground surface (BGS). This chamber consists of a polypropylene corrugated chamber (resembling a tube-like structure), impermeable liners, and a stone bottom.86 The Stormtech MC-3500 chamber will have a storage capacity of 1,780 cubic feet of runoff. 84 DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Report dated May 29, 2018. 85 Ibid. 86 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 77 These chambers are used for storage and no infiltration will occur since the underground detention will utilize an impermeable liner to store the required detention volume. Other BMPs include Eco-Stone Permeable Pavers and hydrodynamic separators. The Eco-Stone Permeable Pavers allow surface runoff to percolate through small openings, where surface runoff will be filtered via a crushed gravel base. Lastly, excess surface runoff that accumulates within the landscaped areas will drain into yard drain inlets. From there, runoff will be conveyed to the hydrodynamic separators via new six-inch storm drains.87 Runoff processed by the hydrodynamic separators will pass through filter screens which will remove trash and debris. This filter screen will also allow sediment to be removed and sink to the bottom of the separators in special sediment chambers. Filtered runoff will then be expelled from the separators through an outlet pipe. Even though the project’s implementation will result in a reduction of pervious surfaces, the post- construction BMPs will allow excess runoff to be filtered and percolate into the ground. As a result, the potential operational impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. B. Would the project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less than Significant Impact. The grading that will occur will not extend to the depths where groundwater may be encountered. As indicated in the geotechnical report summarized in Section 3.6, groundwater was encountered in borings at a depth of 16.5 feet. Grading and excavation will not extend greater than three feet BGS. As a result, no dewatering will occur as part of the proposed project’s construction. Therefore no direct construction related impacts to groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge activities will occur. The project will continue to be connected to the City’s water lines and will not result in a direct decrease in underlying groundwater supplies. Furthermore, the project’s contractors will be required to adhere to the applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the construction site. Adherence to the required BMPs will restrict the discharge of contaminated runoff into the local storm drain system. As a result, the impacts are anticipated to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. C. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? No Impact. The project’s construction will be restricted to the designated project site and the project will not alter the course of any stream or river that would lead to on- or off-site siltation or erosion. The Carbon Creek is the closest body of water to the project site. This creek is located 420 feet to the north of the project site and is channelized at this location for flood control.88 Once implemented, the 87 DMS Consultants, Inc. WQMP Plot Plan. Plan dated April 2, 2018. 88 Google Earth. Website accessed April 20, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 78 proposed project will change the site’s drainage characteristics. A majority of the project site is covered over in pervious surfaces. Currently, stormwater runoff either percolates into the ground, or is discharged off-site into local storm drains. Following construction, 31 percent of the site will consist of pervious surfaces. Nevertheless, the project will not lead to an increased amount of runoff that would exceed the capacity of the local stormwater infrastructure. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan dated May 29, 2018 and a Preliminary Hydrology & Hydraulics Study dated May 29, 2018 were prepared for the project by DMS Consultants, Inc. pursuant to Title 10 of the City’s Municipal Code (these reports are provided in Appendix D). According to the Hydrology Report and WQMP, the project will include the use of a StormTech MC-3500 stormwater chamber, catch basins, permeable pavers, and two hydrodynamic separators.89 These post- construction BMPs will filter out contaminants of concern, allow runoff to percolate into the ground, and will also result in the controlled discharge of excess runoff off-site. As a result, no impacts related to off-site erosion or siltation will occur. In addition, the Applicant will be required to adhere to the construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. Stormwater Runoff Program which includes the City of Anaheim. This program includes the County of Orange, the cities of Orange County, and the Orange County Flood Control District. Since runoff will be contained on-site during the project’s construction and occupation, no off-site erosion will occur and no mitigation measures are required. D. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? No Impact. The project’s construction will be restricted to the designated project site and the project will not alter the course of any stream or river that would lead to on- or off-site flooding. The Carbon Creek is the closest body of water to the project site. This creek is located 420 feet to the north of the project site and is channelized at this location for flood control.90 Once implemented, the proposed project will change the site’s drainage characteristics. A majority of the project site is covered over in pervious surfaces. Currently, stormwater runoff either percolates into the ground, or is discharged off- site into local storm drains. Following construction, 31 percent of the site will consist of pervious surfaces. Nevertheless, the project will not lead to an increased amount of runoff that would exceed the capacity of the local stormwater infrastructure. Since runoff will be contained on-site during the project’s construction and occupation, no off-site erosion or flooding will occur and no mitigation measures are required. 89 DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Study. Report dated May 29, 2018; and, DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Report dated May 29, 2018 90 Google Earth. Website accessed April 20, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 79 E. Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less than Significant Impact. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan dated May 29, 2018 and a Preliminary Hydrology & Hydraulics Study dated May 29, 2018 were prepared for the project by DMS Consultants, Inc. pursuant to Title 10 of the City’s Municipal Code (these reports are provided in Appendix D). According to the Hydrology Report and WQMP, the project will include the use of a StormTech MC-3500 stormwater chamber, catch basins, permeable pavers, and two hydrodynamic separators.91 Other BMPs include Eco-Stone Permeable Pavers, hydrodynamic separators, and yard drain inlets. Therefore, the project’s implementation will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems; or provide additional sources of polluted runoff. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. F. Would the project otherwise substantially degrade water quality? No Impact. The proposed project will be constructed in compliance with Chapter 10.09 of the City’s Municipal Code. Chapter 10.09 is responsible for implementing the NPDES and MS4 stormwater runoff requirements. Furthermore, the project’s contractors will be required to implement the construction BMPs identified in the Orange County Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. As a result, no other impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. G. Would the project place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. According the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance maps obtained for the City of Anaheim, the proposed project site is located in Flood Zone X.92 This flood zone has an annual probability of flooding of less than 0.2 percent and represents areas outside the 500-year flood plain. Thus, properties located in Zone X are not located within a 100-year flood plain.93 As a result, no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. H. Would the project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. According the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance maps obtained for the City of Anaheim, the proposed project site is located in Flood Zone X.94 This flood zone has an annual probability of flooding of less than 0.2 percent and represents areas outside the 500-year 91 DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Report dated May 29, 2018. 92 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA Flood Map. https://map1.msc.fema.gov/idms/IntraView.cgi?KEY=4145033&IFIT=1. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 93 FEMA. Flood Zones, Definition/Description. http://www.fema.gov/floodplain-management/flood-zones. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 94 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA Flood Map. https://map1.msc.fema.gov/idms/IntraView.cgi?KEY=4145033&IFIT=1. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 80 flood plain. Thus, properties located in Zone X are not located within a 100-year flood plain.95 As a result, no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. I. Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the Hazard Mitigation Plan that was prepared for the City, the project site is located within the dam inundation area of the Prado Dam. The potential impacts regarding dam inundation are no greater for the project site than for the surrounding areas. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. J. Would the project expose people or structures to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. A seiche in the Carbon Creek is not likely to happen due to the current level of channelization and volume of water present. In addition, the project site is located inland approximately eight miles from the Pacific Ocean and the project site would not be exposed to the effects of a tsunami.96 As a result, no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. K. Substantially degrade water quality by contributing pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling, or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project consists of 19 townhome units. No hazardous materials other than those that are widely available and used in a household or commercial setting will be used on-site. The project does not include any outdoor work areas, loading areas, or delivery areas. In addition, vehicular maintenance will be prohibited. Nevertheless, the vehicles that will travel to and from the site may release fluids and other contaminants of concern that could have a detrimental effect on the surrounding environment. These contaminants of concern will be intercepted by the post- costruction BMPs and the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant. Therefore, no mitigation is required. L. Substantially degrade water quality by discharge which affects the beneficial uses (i.e., swimming, fishing, etc.) of the receiving or downstream waters? Less than Significant Impact. As indicated previously, the project will include the use of a StormTech MC-3500 stormwater chamber, catch basins, permeable pavers, and two hydrodynamic separators.97 These post-construction BMPs will filter out contaminants of concern, allow runoff to percolate into the ground, and will also result in the controlled discharge of excess runoff off-site. Therefore, no 95 FEMA. Flood Zones, Definition/Description. http://www.fema.gov/floodplain-management/flood-zones. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 96 Google Earth. Website accessed April 20, 2018. 97 DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Study. Report dated May 29, 2018; and, DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Report dated May 29, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 81 contaminated runoff will be discharged off-site once the project is occupied. In addition, the Applicant will be required to adhere to the construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. Stormwater Runoff Program which includes the City of Anaheim. This program includes the County of Orange, the cities of Orange County, and the Orange County Flood Control District. Since runoff will be contained on-site during the project’s construction and occupation, no discharge of polluted runoff will occur and no mitigation measures are required. Lastly, the Carbon Creek is the closest body of water to the project site. This creek is located 420 feet to the north of the project site and is channelized at this location for flood control.98 M. Potentially impact stormwater runoff from construction activities? Less than Significant. Construction activities such as site preparation and grading may have the potential to result in the discharge of sediment, oils, residual diesel fuel, rubbish, or other contaminants of concern into the local streets and/or stormwater infrastructure. The discharge of contaminated runoff from construction will be minimized since the Applicant will be required to adhere to the construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. The construction BMPs identified in the Construction Runoff Guidance Manual are applicable for all projects located within Orange County.99 These construction BMPs are grouped into the following categories: ● Erosion control, which focuses on preventing soil from being eroded by stormwater and potentially discharged from the construction site; ● Sediment control, which focuses on preventing eroded soil from being discharged from the construction site; ● Wind erosion control, which protects the soil surface and prevents the soil particles from being detached by wind; ● Tracking control, which prevents or reduces the amount of sediment that is tracked to paved areas from unpaved areas by vehicles or construction equipment; ● Non-stormwater management, which limits or reduces potential pollutants at their source before they are exposed to stormwater; and, ● Waste management and materials pollution control, which practices that limit or reduce or prevent the contamination of stormwater by construction wastes and materials.100 98 Google Earth. Website accessed April 20, 2018. 99 Orange County Public Works. Construction Runoff Guidance Manual. Report dated December 2012. 100 DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Report dated May 29, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 82 The City’s NPDES program coordinator and inspector is responsible for ensuring compliance with the County requirements. As a result, the potential construction impacts are considered to be less than significant and no separate mitigation is required. The project Applicant would also be required to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) pursuant to General Construction Activity NPDES regulations since the project would connect to the City’s MS4. The SWPPP would contain additional construction BMPs that would be the responsibility of the project Applicant to implement. Furthermore, the Applicant would also be required to submit a Notice of Intent to comply with the General Construction Activity NPDES Permit to the State Water Resources Control Board. Implementation of the BMPs outlined in the SWPPP and the County’s Construction Runoff Guidance Manual will prevent the discharge of sediment and other contaminants of concern off-site during the project’s construction phase. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. N. Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post-construction activities? Less than Significant Impact. As indicated previously, the project will include the use of a StormTech MC-3500 stormwater chamber, catch basins, permeable pavers, and two hydrodynamic separators.101 These post-construction BMPs will filter out contaminants of concern, allow runoff to percolate into the ground, and will also result in the controlled discharge of excess runoff off-site. Therefore, no contaminated runoff will be discharged off-site once the project is occupied. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. O. Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? Less than Significant Impact. The post-construction BMPs that are included in the WQMP will facilitate the percolation of runoff into the ground. In addition, these BMPs will also result in the detention and controlled discharge of runoff off-site into the local storm drains. As a result, the project will not produce volumes of runoff that will lead to any environmental impacts and the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant. Thus, no mitigation is required. P. Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? No Impact. As stated throughout the section, runoff will either percolate into the ground, or will be discharged in a controlled manner into the local stormwater infrastructure. As a result, no erosion will occur and no mitigation is necessary. 3.9.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Impacts related to hydrology and water quality are typically site-specific. The analysis determined that the implementation of the proposed project would not result in any impacts related to water and hydrology impacts. As a result, no cumulative impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. 101 DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Study. Report dated May 29, 2018; and, DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Report dated May 29, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 83 3.10 LAND USE & PLANNING Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.10.A. Physically divide an established community? X 3.10.B. Conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X 3.10.C Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X 3.10.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project physically divide an established community? No Impact. The project area is located in the midst of a residential neighborhood located in the southwestern portion of the City. The following land uses and development are located near the project site: ● North of the project site. Savanna Street extends along the north side of the project site. Apartment complexes and other high density residential development occupies frontage along the north side of Savanna Street. ● South of the project site. Apartments are located adjacent to the project site on the south side. Single-family residential units are located southwest of the project site along Marian Way. ● East of the project site. Townhouses are located adjacent to the project site on the east. Knott Avenue is located 534 feet further east of the site. ● West of the project site. Apartments are located west of the project site.102 Marian Way is located 190 feet further west of the site.103 The granting of the requested entitlements and subsequent construction of the proposed project will not result in any expansion of the use beyond the current boundaries. As a result, the project will not lead to any division of an existing established neighborhood and no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. 102 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Site Survey. The site visit was conducted on April 5, 2018. 103 Google Earth. Website accessed on April 18, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 84 B. Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less than Significant Impact. The project site is zoned RM-4 (Multiple-family residential). In addition, the project site’s General Plan land use designation is Low-Medium Density. The project site’s zoning and general plan land use designations are shown in Exhibit 3-3 and Exhibit 3-4, respectively. The project’s implementation will require the approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA) from Low-Medium Density to Mid Density; the approval of a Zone Reclassification from RM-4 (Multiple-Family Residential) to RM-3.5 (Multiple-Family Residential); the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to permit residential development within the RM-3.5 zone and to allow for modified development; and, the approval of a Tentative Tract Map (TTM No. 18152) for a one lot subdivision for 19 units. Table 3-6 depicts the proposed project’s conformity with the City’s RM-4 zoning standards. Table 3-6 The Project Conformity with the City’s Zoning Standards Description City Requirements Project Element Conforms? Minimum Lot Width 70 feet 158 feet Yes Maximum Building Height 40 feet or 3 stories 36 ft. 7 in., 3 stories max Yes Minimum Floor Area 825 sq. ft. (2-bedroom) 1,268-1,276 sq. ft Yes Maximum Lot Coverage 55% 35% Yes Minimum Required Setbacks 15 street, 15 interior, 40 between buildings Up to 15 feet 2 inches for street, up to 15 feet for interior setback, and up to 16 feet 1 inch for setbacks between buildings Yes* Minimum Recreation-Leisure Space 3,800 sq. ft 5,931 sq. ft Yes Parking Required 43 spaces 45 spaces Yes Source: City of Anaheim Municipal Code. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 *= This project element conforms to the City’s requirements with the approval of the CUP to modify the setback standards. The proposed project would change the General Plan Land Use designation to the Mid Density Residential designation, which provides for a wide range of residential uses, including detached, small- lot single-family homes, attached single-family homes, patio homes, zero lot line homes, duplexes, and townhouses. This category is implemented by the RM-1, RM-2, RM-3, and RM-3.5 zones. The permitted density range is from zero up to 27 dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed project would reclassify the property to RM-3.5 Multiple-Family Residential Zone. The intent of the "RM-3.5" Zone is to provide an attractive, safe, and healthy environment with multiple-family units with a minimum building site area per dwelling unit of one thousand six hundred (1,600) square feet. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 85 EXHIBIT 3-3 ZONING MAP SOURCE: CITY OF ANAHEIM Project Site Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 86 EXHIBIT 3-4 GENERAL PLAN MAP SOURCE: CITY OF ANAHEIM Project Site Proposed GP Designation Existing GP Designation CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 87 As indicated in the Table, the project will comply with the City’s development standards with the exception of the minimum interior, side, and building to building setbacks, which are allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The approval of the aforementioned discretionary actions will ensure that potential land use impacts remain at levels that are considered to be less than significant. Therefore, less than significant impacts will occur upon implementation of the proposed project and no mitigation is required. C. Would the project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. The proposed project will not impact an adopted or approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan because the proposed project is located in the midst of an urban area. The construction and operation of the proposed project will not affect any designated Orange County Significant Ecological Area (SEA) since the proposed development will be restricted to the project area. In addition, the project site is many miles west of and will not affect the Chino Hills State Park or the Cleveland National Forest. Therefore, no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. 3.10.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Typically, land use and planning impacts are considered to be site-specific. The analysis determined that the proposed project will not result in any significant land use impacts. As a result, no cumulative land use impacts will occur as part of the proposed project’s implementation and no mitigation is required for cumulative land use or planning impacts. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 88 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.11.A. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? X 3.11.B. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? X 3.11.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. The project site is not located in a Significant Mineral Aggregate Resource Area (SMARA) nor is it located in an area with active mineral extraction activities. A review of California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources well finder indicates that there are no wells located in the vicinity of the project site.104 In addition, according to SMARA, study area maps prepared by the California Geological Survey, the project site is located within Mineral Resources Zone (MRZ) 4.105 Areas located within MRZ 4 are classified as areas where available information is inadequate for assignment to any other MRZ zone.106 As indicated previously, the site is occupied by two single-family units. There are no active mineral extraction activities occurring on-site or in the adjacent properties. As a result, no impacts to mineral resources will occur and no mitigation is required. B. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. As previously mentioned, no mineral, oil, or energy extraction and/or generation activities are located within the project area. Moreover, the proposed project will not interfere with any resource extraction activity. Therefore, no impacts will result from the implementation of the proposed project and no mitigation is required. 104 California, State of. Department of Conservation. California Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources Well Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/#close. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 105 California, State of. Department of Conservation. Mineral Land Classification Map for Los Alamitos Quadrangle. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/pubs/sr/SR_143/PartIII/Plate_3-17.pdf. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 106 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 89 3.11.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The potential impacts on mineral resources are site-specific. Furthermore, the analysis determined that the proposed project would not result in any impacts on mineral resources. As a result, no cumulative impacts will occur and no project mitigation is required relative to cumulative impacts on mineral resources. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 90 3.12 NOISE Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.12.A. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X 3.12.B. Exposure of people to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X 3.12.C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above noise levels existing without the project? X 3.12.D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X 3.12.E. For a project located with an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X 3.12.F. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X 3.12.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project result in the exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than Significant Impact. Noise levels may be described using a number of methods designed to evaluate the "loudness" of a particular noise. The most commonly used unit for measuring the level of sound is the decibel (dB). Zero on the decibel scale represents the lowest limit of sound that can be heard by humans. The eardrum may rupture at 140 dB. In general, an increase of between 3.o dB and 5.o dB in the ambient noise level is considered to represent the threshold for human sensitivity. Noise levels may also be expressed as dBA where an “A” weighting has been incorporated into the measurement metric to account for increased human sensitivity to noise. The A-weighted measurements correlate well with the perceived nose levels at lower frequencies. Noise may be generated from a point source, such as a piece of construction equipment, or from a line source, such as a road containing moving vehicles. Noise may be generated from a point source, such as a piece of construction equipment, or from a line source, such as a road containing moving vehicles. The ambient noise environment within the project area is dominated by traffic noise emanating from Savanna Street. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 91 A Westward Digital Sound Level Meter Model: 5URG5 (Type 2 meter) was used to conduct the noise measurements. The meter was performed using a slow response setting, with an “A” weighting. The meter’s height above the ground surface was five feet. A series of 100 discrete noise measurements were recorded along the project site’s northern property line. The duration of each measurement period was 15 minutes. The results of the survey are summarized in Table 3-7. The measurements were taken on a Thursday morning at 10:30. The median ambient exterior noise level (L50) was 50.5 dBA at the measurement location. The L50 represents the noise level that is exceeded 50 percent of the time (half the time the noise level exceeds this level and half the time the noise level is less than this level). As shown in Table 3-7, the average ambient noise level was 54.4 dBA. Table 3-7 Noise Measurement Results Noise Metric Noise Level (dBA) Location 1 - Northern End of the Site L50 (Noise levels <50% of time) 50.5 dBA L75 (Noise levels <75% of time) 61.8 dBA L90 (Noise levels <90% of time) 67.1 dBA L99 (Noise levels <99% of time) 68.5 dBA Lmin (Minimum Noise Level) 43.3 dBA Lmax (Maximum Noise Level) 73.1 dBA Average Noise Level 54.4 dBA Source: Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. The existing ambient noise environment is conducive for residential development. The average ambient noise level of 54.4 dBA is within the “Normally Acceptable” range established for multiple-family residential developments (refer to Exhibit 3-5).107 Therefore, no post-construction mitigation is required. Section 18.40.090 – Sound Attenuation for Residential Developments of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code establishes an exterior noise level of 65 dBA for single and multiple-family development. The section requires mitigation to attenuate exterior noise levels for residential developments involving the construction of two or more dwelling units, or residential subdivisions resulting in two (2) or more parcels, and located within six hundred (600) feet of any railroad, freeway, expressway, major arterial, primary arterial or secondary arterial. According to the Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan, Knott Avenue is classified as a primary arterial. The project site is located within 600 feet of Knott Avenue. Despite the site’s proximity to a major arterial, the average ambient noise level along the site’s northern property line was 54.4 dBA at the time of the recording. A traffic noise prediction model was operated for the nearest segment of Savanna Street to determine the projected noise exposure levels from traffic noise. The noise prediction model utilizes a number of independent variables to predict LDN (the average 24-hour day and nighttime noise level), including existing traffic volumes, nature of the ground surface (defined as hardscape or softscape), roadway grade, and the receptor distance from the roadway centerline. The traffic noise levels are depicted using noise “contours” that define the traffic noise levels within the contour. 107 City of Anaheim General Plan. Noise Element Figure N-2-Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure. Plan dated May 2004. Site accessed on April 20, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 92 EXHIBIT 3-5 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE EXPOSURE Source: City of Anaheim General Plan CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 93 The noise prediction model indicated that the project would be located within the 66 Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) dBA noise contour. Therefore, the project site would be within the “Conditionally Acceptable” range established for multiple-family residential developments.108 However, this noise would be reduced by the building’s shell, the inclusion of double-paned windows, and central air conditioning. The existing ambient noise environment can support the proposed project. In addition, the proposed project will conform to the following policies outlined in the Noise Element of the City’s General Plan: ● Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing, revising or reviewing development proposals. The existing average noise levels adjacent to the site are 54.4 dBA. As shown in Exhibit 3-5, the project site is within the “Normally Acceptable” range established for multiple-family residential developments. In addition, the neighborhood consists of residential units and no noise generating activities took place at the time of the site survey. ● Discourage the siting of sensitive uses in areas in excess of 65 dBA CNEL without appropriate mitigation. The existing ambient noise levels average 54.4 dBA along the project site’s northern property line. ● Enforce standards to regulate noise from construction activities. Particular emphasis shall be placed on the restriction of the hours in which work other than emergency work may occur. Discourage construction on weekends or holidays except in the case of construction proximate to schools where these operations could disturb the classroom environment. Mitigation has been provided in subsection 3.12.2.D that will ensure the project’s compliance with this policy. ● Require that construction equipment operate with mufflers and intake silencers no less effective than originally equipped. Mitigation has been provided in subsection 3.12.2.D that will ensure the project’s compliance with this policy. Future sources of noise will include noise from vehicles travelling to and from the project site; interior noise; and noise emanating from the parking lot and common open space area. Noise generated within the parking lot and common open space areas would include people shouting/laughing, which averages 64.5 dBA; car door slamming, which averages 62.5 dBA; car idling, which averages 61 dBA; car starting, which averages 59.5 dBA; and people talking, which averages 41 dBA. All of these averages were taken at a distance of 50 feet from the source. This information is based on actual parking lot noise measurements taken by Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Noise from the aforementioned sources will be attenuated by the six-foot tall concrete wall that will be installed along the site’s eastern, southern, and western property lines. An additional six-foot tall wall is located east of the project site along the adjacent property’s western property line. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 108 City of Anaheim General Plan. Noise Element Figure N-2-Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure. Plan dated May 2004. Site accessed on April 20, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 94 B. Would the project result in the exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than Significant Impact. The nearest land uses that may potentially be impacted from ground borne vibration and noise (primarily from the use of heavy construction equipment) are the residential units that abut the site to the east, south, and west. The noisiest phases of construction are anticipated to be 89 dBA at a distance of 50 feet as measured from the noise source (i.e. the location of the construction equipment). The construction activities will be concentrated in the interior of the site where the building demolition and the erection of the new housing units will occur. The construction noise levels will decline as one moves away from the noise source. This effect is known as spreading loss. In general, the noise level adjustment that takes the spreading loss into account calls for a 6.0 dBA reduction for every doubling of the distance beginning with the initial 50-foot distance. Mitigation has been provided in Subsection 3.12.2.D to alleviate potential noise impacts generated during the project’s construction phase. The background vibration velocity level in residential areas is usually around 50 vibration velocity level (VdB). The vibration velocity level threshold of perception for humans is approximately 65 VdB. A vibration velocity of 75 VdB is the approximately dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels for many people. Sources within buildings such as operation of mechanical equipment, movement of people, or the slamming of doors causes most perceptible indoor vibration. Construction activities may result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the types of equipment, the characteristics of the soil, and the age and construction of nearby buildings. The operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Buildings located in the vicinity of the construction site respond to these vibrations with varying results ranging from no perceptible effects, low rumbling sounds and discernible vibrations at moderate levels, and actual building damage at the highest levels. Ground vibrations associated with construction activities using modern construction methods and equipment rarely reach the levels that result in damage to nearby buildings though vibration related to construction activities may be discernible in areas located near the construction site. A possible exception is in older buildings where special care must be taken to avoid damage. Table 3-8 summarizes the levels of vibration and the usual effect on people and buildings. The U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) has guidelines for vibration levels from construction related to their activities, and recommends that the maximum peak-particle- velocity (PPV) levels remain below 0.05 inches per second at the nearest structures. PPV refers to the movement within the ground of molecular particles and not surface movement. Vibration levels above 0.5 inches per second have the potential to cause architectural damage to normal dwellings. The U.S. DOT also states that vibration levels above 0.015 inches per second (in/sec) are sometimes perceptible to people, and the level at which vibration becomes an irritation to people is 0.64 inches per second. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 95 Table 3-8 Common Effects of Construction Vibration Peak Particle Velocity (in/sec) Vibration Effects on Humans Vibration Effects on Buildings <0.005 Imperceptible No effect on buildings 0.005 to 0.015 Barely perceptible No effect on buildings 0.02 to 0.05 Level at which continuous vibrations begin to annoy occupants of nearby buildings No effect on buildings 0.1 to 0.5 Vibrations considered unacceptable for persons exposed to continuous or long-term vibration. Minimal potential for damage to weak or sensitive structures 0.5 to 1.0 Vibrations considered bothersome by most people, however tolerable if short-term in length Threshold at which there is a risk of architectural damage to buildings with plastered ceilings and walls. Some risk to ancient monuments and ruins. 1.0 to 2.0 Vibrations considered unpleasant by most people. U.S. Bureau of Mines data indicates that blasting vibration in this range will not harm most buildings. Most construction vibration limits are in this range. >3.0 Vibration is unpleasant Potential for architectural damage and possible minor structural damage Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Typical levels from vibration generally do not have the potential for any structural damage. Some construction activities, such as pile driving and blasting, can produce vibration levels that may have the potential to damage some vibration sensitive structures if performed within 50 to 100 feet of the structure. The reason that normal construction vibration does not result in structural damage has to do with several issues, including the frequency vibration and magnitude of construction related vibration. Unlike earthquakes, which produce vibration at very low frequencies and have a high potential for structural damage, most construction vibration is in the mid- to upper- frequency range, and therefore has a lower potential for structural damage. Various types of construction equipment have been measured under a wide variety of construction activities with an average of source levels reported in terms of velocity levels as shown in Table 3-9. Although the table gives one level for each piece of equipment, it should be noted that there is a considerable variation in reported ground vibration levels from construction activities. The data in Table 3-9 does provide a reasonable estimate for a wide range of soil conditions. Based on Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA, May 2006), a vibration level of 102 VdB (vibration decibels, or 0.5 inches per second [in/sec]) (FTA, May 2006) is considered safe and would not result in any construction vibration damage. In general, the townhome units will be located between 30 and 39 feet from the adjacent sensitive receptors. Thus, construction of the townhome units would take place a minimum of 30 feet from the nearby residential uses. No pile driving equipment would be used during the project’s construction and no significant grading would be required to accommodate the project. Therefore, the proposed project will not generate any significant vibration impacts. The project’s construction will require the use of a jackhammer to break up the concrete driveway that extends along the east side of the project site. The presence of the existing concrete wall located along within the CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 96 adjacent property will help attenuate the noise and vibration emanating from the jackhammer. In addition, the peak particle velocity will be below the 0.5 inches per second threshold discussed above. Once operational, the proposed project will not generate excessive ground-borne noise because the project will not require the use of equipment capable of creating ground-borne noise. The project will be required to adhere to all pertinent City noise control regulations. In addition, the cumulative traffic associated with the proposed project will not be great enough to result in a measurable or perceptible increase in traffic noise (it typically requires a doubling of traffic volumes to increase the ambient noise levels to 3.0 dBA or greater). Adherence to the construction and post-construction mitigation provided in the previous subsection will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant. C. Would the project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less than Significant Impact. A traffic noise prediction model was operated for the nearest segment of Savanna Street to determine the projected noise exposure levels from traffic noise. The noise prediction model utilizes a number of independent variables to predict LDN (the average 24-hour day and nighttime noise level), including existing traffic volumes, nature of the ground surface (defined as hardscape or softscape), roadway grade, and the receptor distance from the roadway centerline. The traffic noise levels are depicted using noise “contours” that define the traffic noise levels within the contour. The noise prediction model indicated that the project would be located within the 66 Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) dBA noise contour. Therefore, the project site would be within the “Conditionally Acceptable” range established for multiple-family residential developments.109 However, this noise would be reduced by the building’s shell, the inclusion of double-paned windows, 109 City of Anaheim General Plan. Noise Element Figure N-2-Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure. Plan dated May 2004. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 Table 3-9 Vibration Source Levels for Typical Construction Equipment Construction Equipment PPV @25 ft. (inches/sec.) Vibration (VdB) @ 25 ft. Pile Driver (impact) Upper range 1.58 112 Typical 0.644 104 Pile Drive (Sonic) Upper range 0.734 105 Typical 0.170 93 Clam Shovel Drop 0.202 94 Large Bulldozer 0.089 87 Caisson Drilling 0.089 87 Loaded Trucks 0.076 86 Jackhammer 0.035 79 Source: Noise and Vibration During Construction CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 97 and central air conditioning. When adding the additional peak hour traffic from the proposed project (six PM peak hour trips), the LDN for Savanna Street will remain unchanged (66 dBA). The overall increase in ambient noise level would not be readily apparent to an individual with normal hearing. This typically requires a doubling of traffic volumes to generate a change in ambient noise volumes of between 3.0 and 5.0 dBA. Therefore, the traffic noise impacts resulting from the proposed project’s occupancy are deemed to be less than significant. In addition, the project will not result in the exposure of nearby residents to the generation of excessive ground-borne noise due to the nature of the proposed use (no heavy machinery or equipment are anticipated to be in operation once the project is complete). The proposed project’s future residents will be required to adhere to all pertinent City noise regulations. Future sources of noise will include noise from vehicles travelling to and from the project site; interior noise; and noise emanating from the parking lot and common open space area. Noise generated within the parking lot and common open space areas would include people shouting/laughing, which averages 64.5 dBA; car door slamming, which averages 62.5 dBA; car idling, which averages 61 dBA; car starting, which averages 59.5 dBA; and people talking, which averages 41 dBA. All of these averages were taken at a distance of 50 feet from the source. This information is based on actual parking lot noise measurements taken by Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Noise from the aforementioned sources will be attenuated by the six-foot tall concrete wall that will be installed along the site’s eastern, southern, and western property lines. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. D. Would the project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. As indicated previously, the nearest noise sensitive receptors are the residential units that abut the project site to the east, west, and south. Noise levels associated with various types of construction equipment are summarized in Exhibit 3-6. The noise levels are those that would be expected at a distance of 50 feet from the noise source. Composite construction noise is best characterized in a study prepared by Bolt, Beranek, and Newman. The noisiest phases of construction are anticipated to be 89 dBA at a distance of 50 feet as measured from the noise source (i.e. the location of the construction equipment). The construction activities will be concentrated in the interior of the site where the building demolition and the erection of the new housing units will occur. The homes located along the project site’s eastern property line lie within a 50-foot distance of the construction activity. The demolition of the existing residence and the removal of the concrete driveway will be the predominant source of noise during the demolition phases. The construction of the new units in the eastern portion of the site will also be within 50 feet of the existing homes to the east. Therefore, the highest noise level to reach these sensitive receptors is approximately 89 dBA. Since the project’s construction will likely result in excessive noise levels, the following mitigation is required: Mitigation Measure No. 5 (Noise). The City Inspector shall ensure that the contractors use construction equipment that includes working mufflers and other sound suppression mechanisms as a means to reduce machinery noise. The Inspector must inspect the equipment prior to the start of the demolition phase. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 98 Compactors (Rollers) Front Loaders Backhoes Tractors Scrapers, Graders Pavers Trucks Concrete Mixers Concrete Pumps Cranes (Movable) Cranes (Derrick) Pumps Generators Compressors Pneumatic Wrenches Jack Hammers Pile Drivers Vibrators Saws 70 80 90 100 EXHIBIT 3-6 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS Source: Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning Ea r t h M o v i n g E q u i p m e n t Eq u i p m e n t P o w e r e d b y I n t e r n a l Co m b u s t i o n E n g i n e s Impact Equipment Ma t e r i a l s Ha n d l i n g Eq u i p m e n t Other Equipment St a t i o n a r y Eq u i p m e n t dBA dBA dBA dBA CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 99 Mitigation Measure No. 6 (Noise). The Applicant must notify residents in the area regarding construction times and local contact information. This notice must be placed along the north side of the project site approximately 10 days prior to the start of demolition and shall include the name and phone number of the local contact person residents may call to complain about noise. The City Inspector will verify that the notice has been placed along the north side of the site prior to the start of demolition. Upon receipt of a complaint, the contractor must respond immediately by reducing noise via available reasonable means, and to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. In addition, all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City’s Planning and Building Department. Mitigation Measure No. 7 (Noise). The Applicant shall ensure that the contractors conduct demolition and construction activities between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on weekdays and 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturdays, with no construction permitted on Sundays or Federal holidays. Mitigation Measure No. 5 calls for the use of sound suppressing equipment. For example, a typical excavator will produce noise levels of around 80.5 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. In the quietest configuration, with improved exhaust and intake muffling, fan disengaged, and three sound panels around the engine, the overall level was reduced to 71.5 dBA at a distance of 50 feet.110 Furthermore, regular maintenance of construction equipment will ensure noise levels do not increase over time. The proposed on-site improvements will not require extensive excavation and therefore will not cause extensive noise. Adherence to the mitigation outlined above will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant. Furthermore, the construction noise impacts will cease once construction is complete. The existing six foot wall that separates the project site and the units to the east will further reduce anticipated noise levels. According to Caltrans, an eight inch thick concrete block wall will attenuate noise levels by as much as 34 dBA as long as the line of sight between the noise source and the receptor is blocked by the aforementioned wall.111 E. For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The project site is located within two miles of the Joint Forces Joint Forces Training Base in Los Alamitos.112 The site is not located within the airport’s 60 CNEL boundaries.113 As a result, the proposed project’s implementation would not expose future visitors and residents to excess aircraft noise and no impacts will occur. Therefore, no mitigation is required. 110 Laborers’ Health and Safety Fund of North America. Controlling Noise on Construction Sites. https://www.lhsfna.org/LHSFNA/assets/File/bpguide%202014.pdf 111 California Department of Transportation. Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Report dated September 2013. 112 Toll-Free Airline. Orange County Public and Private Airports, California. http://www.tollfreeairline.com/california/losangeles.htm. Site accessed on April 20, 2018 113 Orange County Airport Land Use Commission. Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Joint Forces Training Base, Los Alamitos. Amended 2015. http://www.ocair.com/commissions/aluc/archive/2015/2015-07-16/item1.pdf. Site accessed on July 17, 2018 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 100 F. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The project site is not located within two miles of a private use airport or helipad. Therefore, no impacts will result with the implementation of the proposed project and no mitigation is required. 3.12.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS According to the City, there are three related projects located within the vicinity of the project site. The number of trips that will be added to the adjacent roadways by the proposed project as well as by the related projects will not result in a doubling of traffic volumes. In addition, the related projects are not located in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project. The separation of the four projects (including the proposed project) will eliminate the concentration of noise generating activities that would result in an increase in cumulative noise levels and no additional mitigation is required. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 101 3.13 POPULATION & HOUSING Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.13.A. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X 3.13.B. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X 3.13.C. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere X 3.13.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No Impact. Growth-inducing impacts are generally associated with the provision of urban services to an undeveloped or rural area. Growth-inducing impacts are described below: ● New development in an area presently undeveloped and economic factors which may influence development. The site is currently occupied by two single-family units. In addition, the site is located in the midst of an urban area. ● Extension of roadways and other transportation facilities. The project will utilize the existing roadways and sidewalks. The new driveway that will be provided will only serve the project and its future residents. ● Extension of infrastructure and other improvements. The project will utilize the existing infrastructure, though new utility lines will be installed. The installation of these new utility lines will not lead to subsequent development. ● Major off-site public projects (treatment plants, etc.). The project is a proposal to construct 19 townhome units on a 0.78-acre lot. The project’s increase in demand for utility services can be accommodated without the construction or expansion of landfills, water treatment plants, or wastewater treatment plants. ● The removal of housing requiring replacement housing elsewhere. The site is occupied by two market rate housing units that will be replaced by 19 new residential units. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 102 ● Additional population growth leading to increased demand for goods and services. The project will result in a potential population increase of up to 68 new persons. This incremental increase in the City’s population will lead to an increase in demand for municipal services, though the payment of all required development impact fees will help alleviate the marginal increase in demand. ● Short-term growth-inducing impacts related to the project’s construction. The project will result in temporary employment during the construction phase. The proposed project is an infill development that will utilize existing roadways and infrastructure. The new utility lines that will be provided will not extend into undeveloped areas and will not result in unplanned growth. According to the Growth Forecast Appendix prepared by SCAG for the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), the City of Anaheim is projected to add a total of 58,100 new residents through the year 2040.114 The potential population increase that is attributable to the proposed project is approximately 68 persons based on the average ratio of 3.38 persons per household identified in the 2010 U.S. Census. Therefore, the proposed project will not result in substantial unplanned population growth. As a result, no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. B. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Less than Significant Impact. The project site is currently occupied by two market rate housing units. These existing units will be demolished in order to accommodate the construction of the 19 new townhome units. The project will involve the construction of 19 new market-rate housing units that will replace the existing two market rate units that will be demolished. As a result, no mitigation is required. C. Would the project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Less than Significant Impact. The project site is currently occupied by two market rate housing units. These existing units will be demolished in order to accommodate the construction of the 19 new townhome units. The proposed project will displace an estimated seven individuals based on the ratio of 3.38 persons per household identified in the 2010 U.S. Census. The project Applicant will not be required to provide replacement housing since the units that occupy the site are market rate units. As a result, less than significant impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. 3.13.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The analysis of potential population and housing impacts indicated that no significant impacts would result upon the proposed project’s implementation. The potential population and employment growth that would result with the implementation of the four cumulative projects (including the proposed 114 Southern California Association of Governments. Growth Forecast. Regional Transportation Plan 2016-2040. Adopted on April 7, 2016. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 103 project) is not a significant factor in relation to population and employment projections calculated for the City in the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS. Moreover, these projects will utilize existing infrastructure including sewer and water lines, roadways, and storm drains. In addition, there will be no citywide net loss in housing. As a result, no cumulative impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 104 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.14.A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives in fire protection services? X 3.14.B. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives in police protection services? X 3.14.C. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives in school services? X 3.14.D. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives in parks? X 3.14.E. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives in other public facilities? X 3.14.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection services? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Anaheim Department of Fire and Rescue provides fire protection services in Anaheim. The Operations Division is the largest division in the Anaheim Fire and Rescue. Under the direction of the Operation's Deputy Chief, the Division employs seven Battalion Chiefs, approximately 200 Suppression Personnel, an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Coordinator, CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 105 a registered nurse EMS Educator, and a senior secretary. Field Operations handles approximately 30,000 emergency incidents a year including fire suppression, rescue, medical aid, and other calls for service. Operation Division manages all major emergency responses and staffs ten engine and six truck companies in 11 Fire Stations. In addition, the Operations Division is responsible for insuring that all personnel are Hazardous Material's First Responder trained, and for maintaining one of Orange County's Type 1 Hazmat Units and a Type I Urban Search & Rescue Team. The training and safety section is also managed by the Operations Division as well as the Type 3 Wildland Interface engines.115 The closest first response station to the project site is the Twila Reid Station No. 11, located 0.92 mile northeast of the site along Orange Avenue. The Department of Fire and Rescue will review the development plans to ascertain the nature and extent of any additional measures that may be required to meet any Fire Code requirements. As stated in Section 3.13.2.C, an estimated seven individuals currently reside on-site based on the average ratio of 3.38 persons per household identified in the 2010 U. S. Census. The project is anticipated to result in a net increase of 61 persons over the existing conditions (68 new residents overall). The proposed project would not place additional demands on fire services since the project is designed with more modern structures. In addition, the project Applicant will be required to pay all pertinent development impact fees. The proposed project will involve the removal of two existing older units that will be replaced by newer units that are in conformance with current building and safety code requirements. In addition, the proposed project is located on an infill property and it will not involve any obstructions or changes to the surrounding public street system. As a result, the proposed project will not affect the response times of the Twila Reid Station No. 11.116 Finally, AFD representatives indicated that the project will not impact response times or capacity. As a result, the potential project’s impacts are less than significant and no mitigation is required. B. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection? Less than Significant Impact. Law enforcement services are provided by the Anaheim Police Department (APD). The APD employs sworn officers, support staff, and a Reserve Officer Detail. Officers operate out of four stations and the City is divided into four service districts (West, Central, South, and East).117 The project site is located in the western district and is served by the APD’s West Station, which is located 1.27 miles to the northeast along the east side of Beach Boulevard. As stated in Section 3.13.2.C, an estimated seven individuals currently reside on-site based on the ratio of 3.38 persons per household identified in the 2010 U.S. Census. The project is anticipated to result in an increase of 61 persons over the existing conditions. 115 City of Anaheim Department of Fire & Rescue. Operations. http://www.anaheim.net/678/Operations. Site accessed April 23, 2018. 116 Telephone communication with Mr. Todd Rudaitis, Inspector with the Anaheim Fire Department. Phone call took place on August 8, 2018. 117 City of Anaheim General Plan. Public Services and Facilities Element. Plan adopted May 2004. Site accessed on April 23, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 106 The proposed project will place an incremental demand on the Department’s services. The APD has reviewed the site plan and has made a number of requirements that have been incorporated directly onto the development plan specifications. These include pre-wiring all of the units for alarm systems, clearing identifying unit addresses both from ground level and from the air, secure doors with deadbolt locks, wide angled peep-holes mounted on or near the doors, adequate security lighting, and ensuring that landscaping and design measures promote defensible space. These requirements are identified directly on-to the site plan and are recommended conditions of approval for the proposed project. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. C. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for school services? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Anaheim is served by eleven school districts that oversee 49 elementary schools, 10 junior high schools, and 14 high schools within City’s boundaries. These public schools currently educate well over 100,000 students and offer additional educational opportunities and facilities to the community at large. The project site is located within the attendance boundaries of the Savanna Elementary School District and the Anaheim Union High School District (AUHSD).118 The closest elementary school to the project site is Hansen Elementary School, located 0.28 mile to the southeast along the east side of Knott Avenue; the closest middle school to the project site is Orangeview Junior High School, located 0.33 mile to the north along the north side of Orange Avenue; lastly, the closest high school is Western High School, located one-half mile to the northeast of the project site along the north side of Orange Avenue.119 To determine the number of students that would be created by the proposed project, a generation rate derived from the Final Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 330 SCH #2003041105 prepared by the Planning Center was used. The EIR was adopted on May 25, 2004. The student generation rates for single-family units are 0.406 for elementary schools, 0.144 for middle schools, and 0.240 for high schools.120 Using these rates, the project has the potential to result in eight elementary school students, three middle school students, and five high school students. The rates for single-family were chosen since they were the most conservative and represented a worst-case scenario. According to the 2010 U.S. Census, approximately 22 percent of the City’s population is aged 5 to 19. Assuming 22 percent of the 68 new residents are school-aged, the project may result in up to 15 new students. The project Applicant will be required to pay all applicable school development fees. Mandatory payment of school impact fees will reduce the potential impacts to levels that are less than significant and no mitigation is required. 118 Anaheim Union High School District. AUHSD Boundaries. http://anaheimuhsd.cyberschool.com. Site accessed on April 23, 2018 119 Google Earth. Website accessed April 20, 2018. 120 The Planning Center. Final Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report No. 330 SCH #2003041105. The EIR was certified on May 25, 2004. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 107 D. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project will include 5,931 square feet of common open space. Various amenities will be provided such as a tot lot and a barbeque area. The inclusion of these amenities and common open space will alleviate the increase in demand for parks and recreational services. In addition, the City of Anaheim requires residential developers to pay an in-lieu park development fee. The payment of this fee will allow the City to conduct regular maintenance or construct/expand new or existing facilities. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. E. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other governmental services? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project has the potential to add an estimated 68 new residents to the City. This increase alone will not require the expansion or construction of new governmental facilities such as libraries and parks since the Applicant is required to pay development impact fees to offset a potential increase in demand for City services that is within the growth boundaries identified in the General Plan and based on zoning designations. The payment of all mandatory development fees will reduce potential governmental service impacts to levels that are less than significant and no mitigation is required. 3.14.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The four cumulative projects (including the proposed project) will lead to an increase in demand for police and fire services. This increase in demand may significantly impact both departments; however, the payment of development fees will ensure both departments have adequate resources to accommodate the additional demand. The payment of all school impact fees will allow the designated school districts to use the fees to alleviate any potential burdens related to an increase in school enrollments. As a result, no cumulative public service impacts are anticipated and no project-related mitigation is required. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 108 3.15 RECREATION Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.15.A. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X 3.15.B. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X 3.15.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less than Significant Impact. The Parks Division of the Community Services Department is responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of 57 parks in Anaheim. These 57 parks encompass 800 acres of parkland.121 The closest park to the project site is Hansen Park, located 0.40 mile to the southeast of the project site.122 As indicated in Section 3.14.2.D, the proposed project will include 5,931 square feet of common open space. Various amenities will be provided such as a tot lot and a barbeque area. The inclusion of these amenities and common open space will alleviate the increase in demand for parks and recreational services. In addition, the City of Anaheim requires residential developers to pay an in-lieu park development fee pursuant to Government Code Section 66477(a), which states: “The legislative body of a city or county may, by ordinance, require the dedication of land or impose a requirement of the payment of fees in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition to the approval of a tentative map or parcel map” The payment of this fee will allow the City to conduct regular maintenance or construct/expand new or existing facilities. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less than Significant Impact. The project will include recreational facilities consisting of 5,931 square feet of common open space, a tot lot, and a barbeque area. These amenities will be restricted for 121 City of Anaheim Parks & Facilities. Parks & Facilities. https://www.anaheim.net/916/Parks-Facilities. Site accessed April 23, 2018. 122 Google Earth. Site accessed April 24, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 109 residents and their guests. In addition, these project features will be restricted to the designated project site and no outside areas will be disturbed to accommodate the installation of the aforementioned amenities. Furthermore, the subsequent increase in usage of City parks and recreational services will not be enough to result in a deterioration of park and recreational services since the developer will be required to pay park development fees. The payment of the in-lieu park fee will allow the City to construct/expand new or existing facilities. Therefore, less than significant impacts will result and no mitigation is required. 3.15.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS A total of two of the four cumulative projects will not have an impact on parks and recreational services. These two projects are commercial in nature (Taco Bell and medical office) and will not result in direct population growth. However, the remaining two projects: the proposed project and the 22-unit Lincoln Cottages will result in an incremental demand on local parks and recreational facilities. Despite the addition of the two residential projects, the payment of all pertinent park development fees will reduce potential cumulative recreation impacts to levels that are less than significant and no mitigation is required of the project. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 110 3.16 TRANSPORTATION Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.16.A. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to, intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? X 3.16.B. Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X 3.16.C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in the location that results in substantial safety risks? X 3.16.D. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? X 3.16.E. Result in inadequate emergency access? X 3.16.F. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X 3.16.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS According to the "Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies" of the City of Anaheim, Intersection Capacity Calculations is based on the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Per City's Growth Management Element requirements, a volume/capacity ratio of 0.90 (Level of Service D) shall be the lowest acceptable Service Level at intersections following implementation of mitigation measures. Mitigation measures sufficient to bring intersections and roadway segments to the acceptable service levels must be identified. A. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to, intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Less than Significant Impact. A Traffic Impact Study dated May 10, 2018 was prepared for the project by K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. (this report is provided in Appendix F). In compliance with the scoping agreement approved by the City of Anaheim, this study includes the following scenarios: CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 111 ● Existing Conditions; ● Existing Conditions plus Project; ● Opening Year (2020); ● Opening Year plus Project (2020); ● General Plan Build-out (2035); and, ● General Plan Build-out plus Project (2035). The project site is situated at 3534 and 3538 West Savanna Street. Savanna Street is an east-west residential collector with one lane in each direction. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The nearest intersection at Savanna Street and Knott Avenue is controlled by traffic signals. Based on the approved scoping agreement, AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts were performed at the intersection of Savanna Street and Knott Avenue on January 25, 2018. Existing traffic volumes and lane configuration are illustrated in Exhibit 3-7.123 Traffic data can be found in Appendix B of the traffic study. This Traffic Study has been approved by the City of Anaheim. Complying with the guidelines, the intersection analysis is performed using SYNCHRO software and the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Table 3-10 shows existing traffic conditions of studied intersections. All studied intersections are currently operated at level of service "A.”124 The analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix C of the traffic study. Table 3-10 Existing Conditions Intersection AM Peak ICU AM Peak LOS PM Peak ICU PM Peak LOS 1. Savanna St at Knott Ave 0.556 A 0.538 A Trip generation represents the amount of traffic attracted and produced by the project development. Based upon the recommendations from "Trip Generation" 10th edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), project related trip generation rates are shown in Table 3-11. Table 3-11 Trip Generation Rate LAND USE UNIT Daily AM Peak PM Peak Total IN OUT Total IN OUT Multi-family Housing (Mid-Rise) (221) Dwelling Unit 5.44 0.36 21% 79% 0.44 61% 39% Single-Family Detached Housing (210) Dwelling Unit 9.44 0.19 25% 75% 0.99 63% 37% 123 K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Study. Report dated May 10, 2018. 124 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 112 EXHIBIT 3-7 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME & LANE CONFIGURATION SOURCE: K2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 113 The proposed developments are expected to have a NET increase of two inbound and four outbound trips in the AM peak hour, four inbound and two outbound trips in the PM peak hour, and 86 daily trips.125 The projected trips associated with the project are provided in Table 3-12. Table 3-12 Project Trip Generation LAND USE UNIT Quantity AM Peak PM Peak Daily Total IN OUT Total IN OUT Multi-family Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) Dwelling Unit 19 7 2 5 8 5 3 105 Single-Family Detached Housing (210) Dwelling Unit -2 -1 0 -1 -2 -1 -1 -19 NET TRIPS 6 2 4 6 4 2 86 Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the proposed project. Directional orientation is largely influenced by the geographical location of the site, among many other factors. The trip distribution pattern for the project is illustrated on Exhibit 3-8. The traffic assignment to and from the project site has been based upon the results of trip generation, trip distribution, and access layouts. Exhibit 3-9 illustrates the traffic assignment of the proposed project for the AM and PM peak hours.126 Traffic volumes of the existing condition plus project traffic are shown in Exhibit 3-10. The project's level of significance of traffic impact under existing conditions for the AM and PM peak hour are shown in Table 3-13. All studied intersections will maintain level of service "A" for the existing conditions plus project.127 Table 3-13 Existing Conditions Plus Project Intersection AM Peak ICU AM Peak LOS PM Peak ICU PM Peak LOS 1. Savanna St. at Knott Ave. 0.559 A 0.539 A 2. Project Driveway 9.5 seconds A 8.9 seconds A Traffic conditions prior to completion of the proposed development is estimated by applying an annual growth rate of one percent over existing traffic counts for year 2020 conditions plus traffic generated by other developments. Traffic volumes for the pre-project completion are illustrated in Exhibit 3-11. 125 K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Study. Report dated May 10, 2018. 126 Ibid. 127 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 114 EXHIBIT 3-8 TRIP DISTRIBUTION SOURCE: K2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 115 EXHIBIT 3-9 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT SOURCE: K2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 116 EXHIBIT 3-10 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLUS PROJECT SOURCE: K2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 117 EXHIBIT 3-11 OPENING YEAR PLUS OTHER DEVELOPMENTS TRAFFIC VOLUME SOURCE: K2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 118 EXHIBIT 3-12 OPENING YEAR PLUS OTHER DEVELOPMENTS PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME SOURCE: K2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 119 Table 3-15 Opening Year Conditions Plus Project Intersection AM Peak ICU AM Peak LOS PM Peak ICU PM Peak LOS 1. Savanna St. at Knott Ave. 0.569 A 0.550 A 2. Project Driveway 9.5 seconds A 8.9 seconds A Based on the projection data furnished by the Planning Department, General Plan build-out conditions are illustrated in Exhibit 3-13. The level of services for AM and PM peak hours are shown in Table 3-16. Table 3-16 General Plan Build-out Level of Service Intersection AM Peak ICU AM Peak LOS PM Peak ICU PM Peak LOS 1. Savanna St. at Knott Ave. 0.728 C 0.538 A Traffic volumes for General Plan Build-out conditions plus project are illustrated in Exhibit 3-14. The level of services for AM and PM peak hours are shown in Table 3-17. Table 3-17 General Plan Build-out Plus Project Level of Service Intersection AM Peak ICU AM Peak LOS PM Peak ICU PM Peak LOS 1. Savanna St. at Knott Ave. 0.732 C 0.539 A 2. Project Driveway 9.6 seconds A 8.8 seconds A In accordance with the City's guidelines, the threshold of significant traffic impact on an intersection is shown in Table 3-18. Table 3-18 Threshold of Significant Impact LOS Final V/C Ratio Project-Related Increase In V/C C > 0.700 - 0.800 ≥ 0.050 D > 0.800 - 0.900 ≥ 0.030 E, F > 0.900 ≥ 0.010 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 120 EXHIBIT 3-13 GENERAL PLAN BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC VOLUME SOURCE: K2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 121 EXHIBIT 3-14 GENERAL PLAN BUILD-OUT PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME SOURCE: K2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 122 The traffic impacts of the project at the study intersection of Savanna Street and Knott Avenue under various scenarios are shown in Table 3-19. The project will not result in a significant impact for any of the study scenario.128 Therefore, no mitigation measures are required and the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant. Table 3-19 Project Impact Analysis Scenario Pre-Project Conditions Post Project Conditions Project- Related Increase in V/C Significant Impact LOS ICU LOS ICU AM PEAK Existing + Project 0.556 A 0.559 A 0.003 NO Opening + Project 0.567 A 0.569 A 0.002 NO GP Build-out + Project 0.728 C 0.732 C 0.004 NO PM PEAK Existing + Project 0.538 A 0.539 A 0.001 NO Opening + Project 0.549 A 0.550 A 0.001 NO GP Build-out + Project 0.538 A 0.539 A 0.001 NO B. Would the project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? No Impact. The proposed project is consistent with the requirements and procedures outlined in the current Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP). The CMP requires that a traffic impact analysis be conducted for any project generating 2,400 or more daily trips, or 1,600 or more daily trips for projects that directly access the CMP Highway System (HS). It should be noted that the two thresholds described above are intended for establishing the CMP based study scope, and are not the CMP’s criteria for determining significant traffic impacts of a development project. Per the CMP, a significant impact is identified if the project causes the CMP facility to operate worse than a LOS E, and increases the ICU value by more than 0.10 if the CMP facility operates at LOS F with the project. The traffic resulting from the project’s occupation will not generate more than 1,600 trips, decrease any intersection’s LOS to an LOS E or worse, or increase an ICU value by more than 0.10. As a result, no impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. 128 K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Study. Report dated May 10, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 123 C. Would the project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in the location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The project site is not located within an approach or take-off aircraft safety zone for the Joint Forces Training Base (refer to Section 3.12.2.E). As a result, no impacts are anticipated and no mitigation is required. D. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? Less than Significant Impact. A Traffic Impact Study dated May 10, 2018 was prepared for the project by K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. (this report is provided in Appendix F). Street parking is allowed on Savanna Street and at project frontage. Site access appears safe and corner sight distance is adequate. The site consists of alleyways at least 24 feet wide connecting all buildings. Adequate setbacks are provided to ensure parking maneuvers be contained on site without affecting traffic on the public street. On-site circulation appears efficient and safe without bottleneck.129 The intersection of Knott Avenue and Savanna Street is signalized. Therefore, the project will not introduce future residents and guests to a dangerous intersection. Furthermore, the project will not introduce equipment or vehicles (such as trucks, etc.) that are incompatible with the surrounding roadways since the project will be residential in nature. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant. E. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. The project would not affect emergency access to any adjacent parcels. At no time will any local streets or parcels be closed to traffic. As a result, the proposed project’s implementation will not result in any impacts and no mitigation is required. F. Would the project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? No Impact. The project site is in close proximity to the Knott Avenue/Savanna Street stop. This stop is utilized by Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Line 25. This bus stop will not be impacted by the proposed project. Furthermore, the proposed project will not significantly affect patrons. There are no bicycle lanes located along Knott Avenue or Savanna Street. In addition, the project will not impact pedestrian facilities since the project will not remove the existing sidewalks. As a result, no impacts will result from the proposed project’s implementation and no mitigation is required. 3.16.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Other developments approved by the City of Anaheim within a five-mile radius of the project site were also taken into consideration. According to the City, there are three related projects located within the vicinity of the project site. The number of trips that will be added to the adjacent roadways by the proposed project as well as by the related projects will not result in a deterioration of any study 129 K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Impact Study. Report dated May 10, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 124 intersection’s level of service. In addition, the related projects are not located in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project. The number of trips that will be generated by the three related projects is shown in Table 3-20. Exhibit 3-15 illustrates traffic volumes generated by other development projects for study intersections. Table 3-20 Cumulative Projects Project Information Location AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Proposed 5,270 sq.ft. single story medical office 3350 W Ball Road 11 3 15 5 13 18 183 Taco Bell with Drive-Through (2,558 sf) 3270 W Lincoln Avenue 52 50 103 43 41 84 1205 Lincoln Cottages (22-unit single-family residences) 3319-3321 W Lincoln Avenue 2 6 8 6 4 10 120 The proposed project is expected to have a net increase of two inbound and four outbound trips in the AM peak hour, four inbound and two outbound trips in the PM peak hour, and 86 net daily trips. The addition of the project’s trips with the trips produced by the related projects listed above will not result in a degradation of any of the study intersection’s level of service. As a result, the cumulative impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 125 EXHIBIT 3-15 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS TRAFFIC VOLUME SOURCE: K2 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 126 3.17 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.17.A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? X 3.17.B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section §5024.1. In applying criterial set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section §5021.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? X 3.17.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resources, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? Less than Significant Impact. A Tribal Resource is defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 and includes the following: ● Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following: included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1. ● A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 127 paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. ● A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. ● A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 21083.2, or a “non-unique archaeological resource” as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 21083.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it conforms to the criteria of subdivision (a). A Sacred Lands File Search was conducted for the project. The results of which came back negative (refer to the letter prepared by the NAHC which is shown in Appendix B). Formal Native American consultation was provided in accordance with AB-52. AB-52 requires a lead agency to begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project, if the tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that geographic area and the tribe requests consultation. AB-52 consultation letters were sent to a total of 22 individuals presenting various branches of the Gabrieleño, Juaneño, Kumeyaay, and Serrano. The specific tribal contacts are included in Appendix B, which is provided under a separate cover. The tribal representative of the Gabrieleño- Kizh indicated that the project site is situated in an area of high archaeological significance. As a result, Mitigation Measure Number 2 was included in Section 3.5 to address potential impacts to cultural resources. This mitigation calls for the use of monitors during ground disturbance activities, which are defined as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis that will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed. In the unlikely event that remains are uncovered by construction crews, all excavation and grading activities shall be halted and the Anaheim Police Department would be contacted (the Department would then contact the County Coroner). This is a standard condition under California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b). With the implementation of this mitigation measure, tribal cultural impacts will be reduced to levels that are considered to be less than significant and no additional mitigation is required. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 128 B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resources, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section §5024.1. In applying criterial set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section §5021.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Less than Significant Impact. A Sacred Lands File Search was conducted for the project. The results of which came back negative (refer to the letter prepared by the NAHC which is shown in Appendix B). Formal Native American consultation was provided in accordance with AB-52. AB-52 requires a lead agency to begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project, if the tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that geographic area and the tribe requests consultation. AB-52 consultation letters were sent to a total of 22 individuals presenting various branches of the Gabrieleño, Juaneño, Kumeyaay, and Serrano. The specific tribal contacts are included in Appendix B, which is provided under a separate cover. The tribal representative of the Gabrieleño-Kizh indicated that the project site is situated in an area of high archaeological significance. As a result, Mitigation Measure Number 2 was included in Section 3.5 to address potential impacts to cultural resources. This mitigation calls for the use of monitors during ground disturbance activities, which are defined as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing, or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis that will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed. In the unlikely event that remains are uncovered by construction crews, all excavation and grading activities shall be halted and the Anaheim Police Department would be contacted (the Department would then contact the County Coroner). This is a standard condition under California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b). With the implementation of this mitigation measure, tribal cultural impacts will be reduced to levels that are considered to be less than significant and no additional mitigation is required. 3.17.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The analysis determined that there would not be any impacts related to tribal cultural resources. As a result, no significant cumulative impacts will occur as part of the implementation of the proposed project and no additional project-related mitigation is required. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 129 3.18 UTILITIES Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3.18.A. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X 3.18.B. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X 3.18.C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X 3.18.D. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X 3.18.E. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? X 3.18.F. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? X 3.18.G. Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X 3.18.H. Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to electricity? X 3.18.I. Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to natural gas? X 3.18.J. Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to telephone service? X 3.18.K. Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to television service/reception? X 3.18.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Less than Significant Impact. Sewage is collected by City collector facilities and conveyed to trunk sewers owned and maintained by the Orange County Sanitation District, which then treats the sewage at regional facilities. The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) is responsible for safely collecting, treating, and disposing the wastewater generated by 2.5 million people living in a 479 square-mile area of central and northwest Orange County.130 The OCSD’s system includes approximately 58o miles of 130 Orange County Sanitation District. History. https://www.ocsd.com/about-us/general-information/history. Site accessed April 23, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 130 sewer lines and two treatment plants located in the Cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. Through these facilities, OCSD collects, conveys, treats, and/or reclaims approximately 23o-million gallons of wastewater generated daily in its service area. Wastewater from the City's local conveyance system is then conveyed to the OCSD trunk sewers and treated at the OCSD Plant No. 2 located in Huntington Beach. The OCSD Revenue Area 3 serves the City of Buena Park, La Habra, Garden Grove, Anaheim, Cypress, La Palma, Stanton, Los Alamitos, Westminster, and Fountain Valley. All sewage flow from Revenue Area 3 is collected and treated at Treatment Plant No. 2, which is located at 22212 Brookhurst Street, Huntington Beach. The estimated average daily effluent received at Plant No. 2 is 127 million gallons (mgd). This facility currently has a total primary treatment capacity of 168 mgd, with an average daily treatment of approximately 127 mgd. Therefore, there is approximately 41 mgd of excess primary treatment capacity at OCSD Plant No. 2. Plant No. 2 also has 90 mgd of secondary treatment capacity. Table 3-22 indicates the future wastewater generation in gallons per day. According to Table 3-22, the proposed project is expected to generate approximately 4,940 gallons of sewage per day, well within the daily average totals for the Huntington Beach treatment plant. Table 3-22 Wastewater (Effluent) Generation (gals/day) Use Unit Factor Generation Proposed Project 19 dwelling units 260 gals/dwelling unit 4,940 gals/day Source: Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts The project Applicant will install a new six-inch sewer line to accommodate the increase in effluent. From there, the new sewer lines will connect to an existing eight-inch sewer line located within Savanna Street. This sewer line will ultimately discharge effluent into the districts' trunk sewer located within Knott Avenue. Therefore, the existing sewer line has sufficient capacity to accommodate the projected flows. Adequate sewage collection and treatment are currently available at the Huntington Beach treatment plant. Therefore, project implementation will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements and the impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. B. Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Anaheim will continue to provide water for the project site. The City receives untreated surface water from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). This water is conveyed to the Lenain Water Treatment Plant, which has a treatment capacity of 15 million gallons per day. The City is presently taking steps to increase the capacity of the aforementioned plant. A Facilities Master Plan was prepared for the City in 2016. This plan contains recommended improvements that will increase the plant’s capacity to 22 million gallons per day.131 The plan to expand the plant’s capacity was not created as a response to the project, but rather a response to a citywide need. 131 City of Anaheim. Rehabilitation and Expansion of Lenain Water Treatment Plant: Final Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration. Report dated April 20, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 131 As indicated previously, wastewater from the City's local conveyance system is then conveyed to the OCSD trunk sewers and treated at the OCSD Plant No. 2 located in Huntington Beach. The estimated average daily effluent received at Plant No. 2 is 127 million gallons (mgd). This facility currently has a total primary treatment capacity of 168 mgd, with an average daily treatment of approximately 127 mgd. Therefore, there is approximately 41 mgd of excess primary treatment capacity at OCSD Plant No. 2. Plant No. 2 also has 90 mgd of secondary treatment capacity. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than Significant Impact. Once constructed, the project will not introduce polluted runoff into the existing storm drain system. In addition, the project will not create excess runoff that will exceed the capacity of the existing storm water drainage system. The project site in its current state is dominated by pervious surfaces. Following construction, the percentage of pervious surfaces on-site will be 31 percent. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan dated May 29, 2018 and a Preliminary Hydrology & Hydraulics Study dated May 29, 2018 were prepared for the project by DMS Consultants, Inc. pursuant to Title 10 of the City’s Municipal Code (these reports are provided in Appendix D). According to the Hydrology Report and WQMP, the project will include the use of a StormTech MC- 3500 stormwater chamber, catch basins, permeable pavers, and two hydrodynamic separators.132 Even though the project’s implementation will result in a reduction of pervious surfaces, the post- construction BMPs will allow excess runoff to be filtered and percolate into the ground. As a result, the potential operational impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. D. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less than Significant Impact. A Final Urban Water Management Plan dated June 2016 was prepared for the City by Arcadis U.S., Inc. The City currently serves water to an area of approximately 49.3 square miles (31,560 acres). The City’s service area includes approximately 1.4 square miles (three percent of the total service area) of water bodies. The City’s service area excludes several small areas inside City limits serviced by other water purveyors and includes areas outside of City limits (between Brookhurst and Gilbert Streets). The City’s current major water system facilities consist of eight import connections to Metropolitan (one untreated water and seven treated water connections), 18 active wells, one 920-million gallon (MG) reservoir for untreated water, one 15-million gallons per day (MGD) water treatment plant, 13 treated water reservoirs with 38.75 MG of total storage capacity, permanent chlorination facilities at various sites, nine booster pump stations, approximately 752 miles of water mains and approximately 7,800 fire hydrants.133 132 DMS Consultants, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Report dated May 29, 2018. 133 Arcadis Design & Consultancy. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. Plan dated June 2016. Site accessed on April 23, 2018. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 132 As indicated in the City’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, the City will have adequate supply to accommodate demand for the years 2020, 2025, and beyond.134 The City will also have enough supplies to accommodate demand through multiple dry years as well.135 Table 3-21 shows the amount of water that will be consumed by the proposed project. According to Table 3-21, the proposed project is projected to consume 9,063 gallons of water on a daily basis. The project will connect to an existing eight-inch water line located along Savanna Street. The existing water supply facilities and infrastructure will be able accommodate this additional demand. In addition, the proposed project will be constructed in compliance with the 2016 California Green Building Code (Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations). More specifically, the project must comply with Division 5.3, Water Efficiency, and Conservation, which mandates the inclusion of water efficient fixtures such as faucets, toilets, showers, and water efficient landscaping. As a result, the impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. E. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less than Significant Impact. As indicated previously, wastewater from the City's local conveyance system is then conveyed to the OCSD trunk sewers and treated at the OCSD Plant No. 2 located in Huntington Beach. The estimated average daily effluent received at Plant No. 2 is 127 million gallons (mgd). This facility currently has a total primary treatment capacity of 168 mgd, with an average daily treatment of approximately 127 mgd. Therefore, there is approximately 41 mgd of excess primary treatment capacity at OCSD Plant No. 2. Plant No. 2 also has 90 mgd of secondary treatment capacity. Thus, the project’s implementation would not require the expansion of existing wastewater treatment facilities or the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities. A Sewer Study was prepared for the project by DMS Consultants, Inc. According to the study, the project will have a total peak flow of 0.032 cubic feet per second.136 The existing eight inch sewer line can accommodate the project’s flows. As a result, less than significant impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. 134 Arcadis Design & Consultancy. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. Plan dated June 2016. Site accessed on April 23, 2018. 135 Ibid. 136 DMS Consultants, Inc. Sewer Study for Tract 18152 3435-3538 Savanna Street, Anaheim, California. Report dated December 19, 2017. Table 3-21 Water Consumption (gals/day) Use Unit Factor Generation Proposed Project 19 dwelling units 477 gals/dwelling unit 9,063 gals/day Source: California Home Building Foundation CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 133 F. Would the project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? Less than Significant Impact. The City contracts with Republic Services for waste collection. Solid waste generated by the project will be transferred to the Olinda Alpha Landfill near Brea or to the Puente Hills Transfer Station/Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). The Olinda Landfill has a maximum permitted daily refuse of 8,000 tons and is expected to be closed by the year 2030.137 An estimated 7,200 to 7,300 tons of solid waste is disposed at the Olinda landfill on a daily basis.138 The remaining daily capacity is approximately 700 tons (1,400,000 pounds). The Puente Hills Transfer Station/MRF is able to accept 4,440 tons per day of solid waste. As shown in Table 3-23, the proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 228 pounds of waste per day. As shown in Table 3-23, the amount of solid waste produced by the project will total an estimated 228 pounds per day. The amount of solid waste produced by the project is not significant and will be accommodated by the aforementioned landfills and transfer stations. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. G. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. The proposed use, like all other development in the City, would be required to adhere to all pertinent ordinances related to waste reduction and recycling. As a result, no impacts on the existing regulations pertaining to solid waste generation would result from the proposed project’s implementation and no mitigation is required. H. Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to electricity? Less than Significant Impact. Table 3-24 below provides an estimate of electrical consumption for the proposed project. As indicated in the table, the project is estimated to consume approximately 123,849 kilowatt (kWh) per year (or 10,317 kWh per month) of electricity. Table 3-24 Estimated Annual Energy Consumption Project Consumption Rate Total Project Consumption Proposed Project (assumes 19-units) Electrical Consumption 6,518 kWh/unit/year 123,849 kWh/year total Source: Southern California Edison. 137 Orange County. County of Orange Waste and Recycling, Olinda Fact sheet. http://oclandfills.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=30447. Site accessed on April 23, 2018 138 Ibid. Table 3-23 Solid Waste Generation (lbs/day) Use Unit Factor Generation Proposed Project 19 dwelling units 12 lbs/day/dwelling unit 228 lbs./day Source: City of Los Angeles. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 134 It is important to note that the project will include energy efficient fixtures. In addition, the energy consumption rates do not reflect the more stringent 2016 California Building and Green Building Code requirements. The proposed project will be in accordance with the City’s Building Code and with Part 6 and Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. On January 12, 2010, the State Building Standards Commission adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code (Code) which became effective on January 1, 2011. The California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (Title 24) became effective to aid efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. Title 24 now requires that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant‐emitting finish materials. The 2016 version of the standards became effective as of January 1, 2017. The 2016 version address additional items such as clean air vehicles, increased requirements for electric vehicles charging infrastructure, organic waste, and water efficiency and conservation. The California Green Building Standards Code do not prevent a local jurisdiction from adopting a more stringent code as state law provides methods for local enhancements. The proposed project will conform to all pertinent energy conservation requirements. All of the light fixtures and appliance will be EnergyStar® rated. As a result, the impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. I. Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to natural gas? Less than Significant Impact. Table 3-25 below provides an estimate of natural gas consumption for the proposed project. As indicated in the table, the project is estimated to consume approximately 6,137 therms per year of natural gas. Table 3-25 Estimated Annual Natural Gas Consumption Project Consumption Rate Total Project Consumption Proposed Project (assumes 19-units) Natural Gas Consumption 323 therms/unit/year 6,137 therms/year total Source: Southern California Gas Company. It is important to note that the project will include energy efficient fixtures. In addition, the energy consumption rates do not reflect the more stringent 2016 California Building and Green Building Code requirements. The proposed project will be in accordance with the City’s Building Code and with Part 6 and Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. As a result, the impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. J. Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to telephone service? Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project will require continued telephone service from AT&T and/or other telecommunication providers. The existing telephone lines on Savannah Street will be utilized to provide service to the proposed project. Thus, impacts on communication systems are anticipated to be less than significant. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 135 K. Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to television service/reception? Less than Significant Impact. Multiple providers including Directv, AT&T U-verse, Dish, Spectrum, and Cox offer television service throughout the City. These providers will be able to accommodate any increase in costumers. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 3.18.2 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS The potential impacts related to utility capacities are site-specific. Furthermore, the analysis herein also determined that the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts on local utilities. The ability of the existing sewer lines, water lines, and other utilities to accommodate the projected demand from future related projects will require evaluation on a case-by-case basis. As a result, no cumulative impacts on utilities will occur and no mitigation is required. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 136 3.19 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Section Description of Issue Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X 3.19.1 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The following findings can be made regarding the Mandatory Findings of Significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the results of this environmental assessment: A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The proposed project would not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment since the project’s air quality emissions would be below the thresholds of significance outlined by the SCAQMD. In addition, no hazardous waste or materials would be used on-site beyond those chemicals that would be used for routine cleaning and maintenance. The project’s implementation will require the removal of two existing single-family units. Asbestos containing materials and/or lead based paint (ACM/LBP) may be present within the two structures due to their age. As a result, mitigation (Mitigation Measure No.4) was provided that will preclude the exposure of nearby residents to ACM/LBP. No impacts to protected species or habitat would result with the implementation of the proposed project. Mitigation (Mitigation Measure No. 1) was provided that would minimize potential construction impacts to nesting avian species. A Sacred Lands File Search was conducted and the results came back negative. Furthermore, tribal consultation was provided in accordance with AB-52. The tribal representative from the Gabrieleño-Kizh indicated CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 137 that the project site is situated in an area of high archaeological significance. Therefore, mitigation (Mitigation Measure No.2) was provided in Section 3.5.2.B herein to address the risk of encountering tribal resources. Furthermore, the best management practices identified in the preliminary WQMP will filter out contaminants of concern present in stormwater runoff. The addition of project trips will not negatively impact any local intersection. Lastly, the project will include energy and water efficient appliances and fixtures. The implementation of the required mitigation measures for biological (Mitigation Measure No. 1) and cultural resources (Mitigation Measure No. 2), geology/soils (Mitigation Measure No. 3), hazards and hazardous materials (Mitigation Measure No. 4), and noise (Mitigation Measure No. 5 and No. 6) would reduce potential impacts to levels that are considered to be less than significant. B. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less than Significant Impact. According to the City, there are three related projects located within the vicinity of the project site. Typically, aesthetic impacts are site-specific. As indicated previously, the proposed project will not restrict scenic views along the adjacent roadways, damage or interfere with any scenic resources or highways, degrade the visual character of the project sites and surrounding areas, or result in significant light and glare impacts; therefore, no cumulative impacts will occur with respect to aesthetics as part of the proposed project’s implementation and no mitigation is required of the proposed project. The analysis of agriculture and forestry impacts determined that there are no agricultural or forestry resources in the project area and that the implementation of the proposed project would not result in any impacts on these resources. As a result, no cumulative impacts on agriculture or forestry resources will occur and no mitigation is required of the proposed project. The combined operational emissions from the proposed project and the three related projects (a 5,270 square feet medical office building specializing in outpatient care located at 3350 West Ball Road; a 2,558 square feet Taco Bell with Drive-Through located at 3270 West Lincoln Avenue; and a 22-unit single-family residential development located at 3319-3321 West Lincoln Avenue) will still be below the thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD (the CalEEMod worksheets for the cumulative emissions are provided in the Appendix). The four projects’ cumulative operational emissions are listed below. These emissions are compared to the thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD for the designated criteria pollutants. ● Reactive Organic Gasses (ROG). Estimated operational emissions: 4.53 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 55 pounds per day. ● Nitric Oxide (NOx). Estimated operational emissions: 13.58 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 55 pounds per day. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 138 ● Carbon Monoxide (CO). Estimated operational emissions: 27.10 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 550 pounds per day. ● Sulfur Dioxide (SO2). Estimated operational emissions: 0.07 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 150 pounds per day. ● Particulate Matter (PM10). Estimated operational emissions: 5.33 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 150 pounds per day. ● Particulate Matter (PM2.5). Estimated operational emissions: 1.56 pounds per day; threshold of significance: 55 pounds per day. As stated above, the cumulative emissions from the four related projects (including the proposed project) will be below the thresholds of significance established by the SCAQMD. As a result, less than significant cumulative air quality impacts will occur and no mitigation is required of the proposed project. The potential impacts in regards to biological and cultural resources and geology and soils are site specific. In addition, the project’s GHG emissions are below thresholds considered to represent a significant impact. The potential impacts related to hazardous materials, land use and planning, and mineral resources are site specific. Furthermore, the three related projects as well as the proposed project would be required to adhere to the City’s low impact development requirements and must take steps to eliminate the discharge of contaminated runoff. The number of trips that will be added to the adjacent roadways by the proposed project as well as by the related projects will not result in a doubling of traffic volumes. In addition, the related projects are not located in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project. The separation of the four projects (including the proposed project) will eliminate the concentration of noise generating activities that would result in an increase in cumulative noise levels and no additional mitigation is required. The analysis of potential population and housing impacts indicated that no significant impacts would result upon the proposed project’s implementation. The potential population and employment growth that would result with the implementation of the four cumulative projects (including the proposed project) is within the population and employment projections calculated for the City by SCAG. Moreover, these projects will utilize existing infrastructure including sewer and water lines, roadways, and storm drains. In addition, there will be no citywide net loss in housing. As a result, no cumulative impacts will occur and no mitigation is required. The four cumulative projects (including the proposed project) will lead to an increase in demand for police and fire services. This increase in demand may significantly impact both departments; however, the payment of development fees will ensure both departments have adequate resources to accommodate the additional demand. The payment of all school impact fees will allow the designated school districts to use the fees to alleviate any potential burdens related to an increase in school CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 139 enrollments. As a result, no cumulative public service impacts are anticipated and no project-related mitigation is required. A total of two of the four cumulative projects will not have an impact on parks and recreational services. These two projects are commercial in nature (Taco Bell and medical office) and will not result in direct population growth. However, the remaining two projects: the proposed project and the 22-unit Lincoln Cottages will result in an incremental demand on local parks and recreational facilities. Despite the addition of the two residential projects, the payment of all pertinent park development fees will reduce potential cumulative recreation impacts to levels that are less than significant and no mitigation is required of the project. Other developments approved by the City of Anaheim were also taken into consideration. Based on information available through the Planning Department, other development projects within a five-mile radius affecting the study intersections are listed in Table 3-20. The location map of these other development projects are illustrated on Exhibit 3-15. Exhibit 3-17 illustrates traffic volumes generated by other development projects for study intersections. The proposed project is expected to have a net increase of two inbound and four outbound trips in the AM peak hour, four inbound and two outbound trips in the PM peak hour, and 86 net daily trips. The addition of the project’s trips with the trips produced by the related projects listed above will not result in a degradation of any of the study intersection’s level of service. As a result, the cumulative impacts are considered to be less than significant and no mitigation is required. The analysis determined that there would not be any impacts related to tribal cultural resources. As a result, no significant cumulative impacts will occur as part of the implementation of the proposed project and no additional project-related mitigation is required. Finally, the analysis herein also determined that the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts on local utilities. The ability of the existing sewer lines, water lines, and other utilities to accommodate the projected demand from future related projects will require evaluation on a case-by-case basis. In conclusion, the project’s impacts have been mitigated and the project’s impacts would be limited and not cumulatively considerable. C. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Daytime and nighttime light and glare from both the proposed project would not contribute any significant impacts since the project must comply with Section 18.42.090.030 of the City’s municipal code. The project’s operational air quality impacts would be less than significant. However, the project’s construction would have the potential to result in particulate matter emissions which may affect the adjacent sensitive receptors. Therefore, project contractors would be responsible for maintaining compliance with SCAQMD’s mandatory Rule 403 regulations, which significantly reduce the generation of fugitive dust. In addition, future truck drivers must adhere to Title 13 - §2485 of the California Code of Regulations, which limits the idling of diesel powered vehicles to less than five minutes. Adherence to the aforementioned standard condition will CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 3 ● ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 140 minimize odor impacts from diesel trucks. Adherence to Rule 403 Regulations and Title 13 - §2485 of the California Code of Regulations will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant. No hazardous waste or materials will be used on-site. The project’s contracts will be required to adhere to all applicable regulations governing the removal, handling, transport, and disposal of lead based paint and/or asbestos containing materials. The analysis contains a specific mitigation measure (Mitigation Measure No.4) dealing with the removal of ACM/LBP. Adherence to the construction noise mitigation provided in the preceding analysis would prevent the exposure of sensitive receptors to excess noise. Lastly, the addition of the project’s traffic would not result in a deterioration of any intersection’s level of service or the creation of a CO hot-spot. As a result, the potential impacts are considered to be less than significant with adherence to the required mitigation measures. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 4 ● CONCLUSIONS PAGE 141 SECTION 4 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 FINDINGS The Initial Study determined that the proposed project is not expected to have significant adverse environmental impacts. The following findings can be made regarding the Mandatory Findings of Significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the results of this Initial Study: ● The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. ● The proposed project will not have the potential to achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. ● The proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. ● The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly or indirectly. ● A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program will be required. 4.2 MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code states that findings must be adopted by the decision- makers coincidental to the approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. These findings shall be incorporated as part of the decision-maker’s findings of fact, in response to AB-3180. In accordance with the requirements of Section 21081(a) and 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code, the following additional findings may be made: ● A mitigation reporting or monitoring program will be required; ● Site plans and/or building plans, submitted for approval by the responsible monitoring agency, shall include the required standard conditions; and, ● An accountable enforcement agency or monitoring agency shall be identified for the mitigations adopted as part of the decision-maker’s final determination. Project Description – The City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, in its capacity as the Lead Agency, is reviewing a request by Bonanni Development to subdivide an existing 33,841 square- foot (0.78-acre) site located at 3534-3538 Savanna Street. The subdivision will allow for the construction of 19 three-story townhome units totaling 24,204 square feet of building floor area. A total of 5,931 square feet of common open space and 10,584 square feet of landscaping (31%) will be provided. The project will provide 45 total parking spaces. Each unit will be equipped with a two-car garage for a total of 38 enclosed parking spaces. Seven additional parking spaces will be reserved for CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 4 ● CONCLUSIONS PAGE 142 guests. Access to the site will be provided by a 24-foot wide driveway located along the south side of Savanna Street. The project also includes the following approvals: 1. Applicant – The project Applicant is Mr. Chris Segesman, Bonanni Development, 5500 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120, Huntington Beach, California 92649. 2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing – Any Mitigation Measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent/timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental quivalency/timing shall be borne by the Applicant. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City’s adopted fee schedule. 3. Timing – This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur because routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance. 4. Responsibility for Monitoring – Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. 5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures – The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this mitigation monitoring program will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the Applicant in January of each year stating how compliance with the subject measures(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction,” the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring. Monitoring will be discontinued after construction is completed. 6. Building Permit – For purposes of this mitigation monitoring program, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building. The monitoring and reporting on the implementation of these measures is identified in Table 4-1 provided on the following pages. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 4 ● CONCLUSIONS PAGE 143 TABLE 4-1 MITIGATION-MONITORING PROGRAM Measure & No. Timing Responsible for Monitoring Completion Biological Resources Mitigation Measure No. 1 (Biological Resources). Prior to issuance of any demolition or building permits, if clearing and/or construction activities would occur during the raptor or migratory bird nesting season (February 15 to August 15), the Applicant and/or its contractor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds up to 14 days before construction activities. The qualified biologist shall survey the construction zone and a 500-foot buffer surrounding the construction zone to determine whether the activities taking place have the potential to disturb or otherwise harm nesting birds. Surveys shall be repeated if project activities are suspended or delayed for more than 15 days during nesting season. If active nest(s) are identified during the preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall establish a 100-foot no-activity setback for migratory bird nests and a 250- foot setback for raptor nests. No ground disturbance should occur within the no-activity setback until the nest is deemed inactive by the qualified biologist. Details of compliance shall be provided in conjunction with or on plans submitted for permits. Prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits. Planning & Building Department Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure No. 2 (Cultural Resources). Prior to issuance of any demolition or building permits, the project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor and archeologist during construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor(s) must be approved by the tribal representatives and will be present on-site during the construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed. The archeologist will monitor grading activities and must complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs completed by both the archaeologist and the tribal monitor must be submitted to the Planning Division on a weekly basis in order to determine compliance with the mitigation measure. In the unlikely event that remains are uncovered by construction crews, all excavation and grading activities shall be halted and the Anaheim Police Department would be contacted (the Department would then contact the County Coroner). This is a standard condition under California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b). Prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits. Planning & Building Department CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 4 ● CONCLUSIONS PAGE 144 TABLE 4.1 MITIGATION-MONITORING PROGRAM Measure & No. Timing Responsible for Monitoring Completion Geology & Soils Mitigation Measure No. 3 (Geology & Soils). The project must comply with all the design and construction-related actions in the site specific Geotechnical Report prepared by Strata-Tech. These design requirements will be confirmed by the City Engineer during the final plan check prior to the issuance of any building permit. In addition, the Applicant must remove and re-compact the underlying soils and provide additional slab and foundation support in order to address potential liquefaction risks. The removal and re-compaction of the underyling soil will be confirmed by the building inspector, the City Engineer, and a representative of Strata-Tech prior to the framing phase of the project’s construction. The recommendations and requirements of the Strata-Tech study must be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. During final plan check prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. Chief Building Official and the City Engineer Hazards & Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure No. 4 (Hazards & Hazardous Materials). The Applicant, and the contractors, must adhere to all requirements governing the handling, removal, and disposal of asbestos-containing materials, lead paint, underground septic tanks, and other hazardous substances and materials that may be encountered during demolition and land clearance activities. The City’s Inspector will ensure compliance by inspecting the site during the demolition phase. Any contamination encountered during the demolition, grading, and/or site preparation activities must also be removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable laws prior to the issuance of any building permit. Duirng the demolition phase. Chief Building Official Noise Mitigation Measure No. 5 (Noise). The City Inspector shall ensure that the contractors use construction equipment that includes working mufflers and other sound suppression mechanisms as a means to reduce machinery noise. The Inspector must inspect the equipment prior to the start of the demolition phase. 10 days prior to the start of the demolition phase. Chief Building Official CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 4 ● CONCLUSIONS PAGE 145 TABLE 4.1 MITIGATION-MONITORING PROGRAM Measure & No. Timing Responsible for Monitoring Completion Mitigation Measure No. 6 (Noise). The Applicant must notify residents in the area regarding construction times and local contact information. This notice must be placed along the north side of the project site approximately 10 days prior to the start of demolition and shall include the name and phone number of the local contact person residents may call to complain about noise. The City Inspector will verify that the notice has been placed along the north side of the site prior to the start of demolition. Upon receipt of a complaint, the contractor must respond immediately by reducing noise via available reasonable means, and to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. In addition, all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City’s Planning and Building Department. 10 days prior to the start of the demolition phase. Chief Building Official and Planning Department Mitigation Measure No. 7 (Noise). The Applicant shall ensure that the contractors conduct demolition and construction activities between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on weekdays and 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturdays, with no construction permitted on Sundays or Federal holidays. Throughout the construction period. Chief Building Official & Planning Department CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET SECTION 4 ● CONCLUSIONS PAGE 146 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET APPENDIX ● PAGE 147 SECTION 5 REFERENCES 5.1 PREPARERS Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning 2211 South Hacienda Boulevard, Suite 107 Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 (626) 336-0033 Marc Blodgett, Project Manager Bryan Hamilton, Project Planner Liesl Sullano, Project Planner 5.2 REFERENCES Bugliarello, et. al., The Impact of Noise Pollution, Chapter 127, 1975. California Administrative Code, Title 24, Energy Conservation, 1990. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Diversity Database, 2011. California Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazards Mapping Program, 2012. California Department of Parks and Recreation, California Historical Landmarks, 2011. California Office of Planning and Research, California Environmental Quality Act and the CEQA Guidelines. California, State of California Public Resources Code Division 13, The California Environmental Quality Act. Chapter 2.5, Section 21067 and Section 21069.1998. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, 2010. Anaheim, City of. Anaheim General Plan. Anaheim, City of. Zoning Ordinance. Southern California Association of Governments, Population, Housing and Employment Projections, 2016. South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Management Plan, 2016. U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2010 U.S. Census. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET APPENDIX ● PAGE 148 U.S. Geological Survey, Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region - An Earth Science Perspective, USGS Professional Paper 1360, 1985. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET APPENDIX ● PAGE 149 APPENDICES PROVIDED UNDER A SEPARATE COVER CITY OF ANAHEIM ● MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ● PAGE 1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF ANAHEIM SAVANNA TOWNHOMES 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2017-00094 LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT 200 ANAHEIM BOULEVARD ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 90220 REPORT PREPARED BY: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 2211 SOUTH HACIENDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 107 HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA 91745 OCTOBER 1, 2018 ANAH 003 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ● PAGE 2 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ● PAGE 3 Terms and Definitions: 1. Property Owner/Developer – The project Applicant is Mr. Chris Segesman, Bonanni Development, 5500 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120, Huntington Beach, California 92649. 2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing – Any Mitigation Measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent/timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental quivalency/timing shall be borne by the Applicant. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City’s adopted fee schedule. 3. Timing – This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur because routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance. 4. Responsibility for Monitoring – Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. 5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures – The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this mitigation monitoring program will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the Applicant in January of each year stating how compliance with the subject measures(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction,” the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring. Monitoring will be discontinued after construction is completed. 6. Building Permit – For purposes of this mitigation monitoring program, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building. SAVANNAH TOWNHOMES MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF ANAHEIM ● MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ● PAGE 4 The monitoring and reporting on the implementation of these measures is identified in the Table provided below and on the following pages. Measure & No. Timing Responsible for Monitoring Completion Biological Resources Mitigation Measure No. 1 (Biological Resources). Prior to issuance of any demolition or building permits, if clearing and/or construction activities would occur during the raptor or migratory bird nesting season (February 15 to August 15), the Applicant and/or its contractor shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting birds up to 14 days before construction activities. The qualified biologist shall survey the construction zone and a 500-foot buffer surrounding the construction zone to determine whether the activities taking place have the potential to disturb or otherwise harm nesting birds. Surveys shall be repeated if project activities are suspended or delayed for more than 15 days during nesting season. If active nest(s) are identified during the preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall establish a 100-foot no-activity setback for migratory bird nests and a 250- foot setback for raptor nests. No ground disturbance should occur within the no-activity setback until the nest is deemed inactive by the qualified biologist. Details of compliance shall be provided in conjunction with or on plans submitted for permits. Prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits. Planning & Building Department Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure No. 2 (Cultural Resources). Prior to issuance of any demolition or building permits, the project Applicant will be required to obtain the services of a qualified Native American Monitor and archeologist during construction-related ground disturbance activities. Ground disturbance is defined as activities that include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation, and trenching, within the project area. The monitor(s) must be approved by the tribal representatives and will be present on-site during the construction phases that involve any ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed. The archeologist will monitor grading activities and must complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs completed by both the archaeologist and the tribal monitor must be submitted to the Planning Division on a weekly basis in order to determine compliance with the mitigation measure. In the unlikely event that remains are uncovered by construction crews, all excavation and grading activities shall be halted and the Anaheim Police Department would be contacted (the Department would then contact the County Coroner). This is a standard condition under California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b). Prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits. Planning & Building Department CITY OF ANAHEIM ● MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ● PAGE 5 Measure & No. Timing Responsible for Monitoring Completion Geology & Soils Mitigation Measure No. 3 (Geology & Soils). The project must comply with all the design and construction-related actions in the site specific Geotechnical Report prepared by Strata-Tech. These design requirements will be confirmed by the City Engineer during the final plan check prior to the issuance of any building permit. In addition, the Applicant must remove and re-compact the underlying soils and provide additional slab and foundation support in order to address potential liquefaction risks. The removal and re-compaction of the underyling soil will be confirmed by the building inspector, the City Engineer, and a representative of Strata-Tech prior to the framing phase of the project’s construction. The recommendations and requirements of the Strata-Tech study must be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. During final plan check prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. Chief Building Official and the City Engineer Hazards & Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure No. 4 (Hazards & Hazardous Materials). The Applicant, and the contractors, must adhere to all requirements governing the handling, removal, and disposal of asbestos-containing materials, lead paint, underground septic tanks, and other hazardous substances and materials that may be encountered during demolition and land clearance activities. The City’s Inspector will ensure compliance by inspecting the site during the demolition phase. Any contamination encountered during the demolition, grading, and/or site preparation activities must also be removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable laws prior to the issuance of any building permit. Duirng the demolition phase. Chief Building Official Noise Mitigation Measure No. 5 (Noise). The City Inspector shall ensure that the contractors use construction equipment that includes working mufflers and other sound suppression mechanisms as a means to reduce machinery noise. The Inspector must inspect the equipment prior to the start of the demolition phase. 10 days prior to the start of the demolition phase. Chief Building Official Mitigation Measure No. 6 (Noise). The Applicant must notify residents in the area regarding construction times and local contact information. This notice must be placed along the north side of the project site approximately 10 days prior to the start of demolition and shall include the name and phone number of the local contact person residents may call to complain about noise. The City Inspector will verify that the notice has been placed along the north side of the site prior to the start of demolition. Upon receipt of a complaint, the contractor must respond immediately by reducing noise via available reasonable means, and to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. In addition, all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City’s Planning and Building Department. 10 days prior to the start of the demolition phase. Chief Building Official and Planning Department CITY OF ANAHEIM ● MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM SAVANNA TOWNHOMES ● 3534-3538 SAVANNA STREET MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ● PAGE 6 Measure & No. Timing Responsible for Monitoring Completion Mitigation Measure No. 7 (Noise). The Applicant shall ensure that the contractors conduct demolition and construction activities between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on weekdays and 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturdays, with no construction permitted on Sundays or Federal holidays. Throughout the construction period. Chief Building Official & Planning Department 5500 Bolsa Avenue Suite 120, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 | Tel: (714) 892‐0123 | www.bonannidevelopment.com Bonanni Development plans to develop and construct 19 Townhomes at the existing on what is currently 3538 W Savanna Street and 3534 W Savanna Street in Anaheim using the RM‐3.5 zoning standards. All 19 townhomes will be three‐story in height and consist of 2 bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms. Each unit will have a two‐car side‐by‐side garage and den located on the bottom floor. This project will be built in one phase and we plan to start construction summer of 2019. ATTACHMENT NO. 9 -Page 1- JUSTIFICATION FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING SERVICES DIVISION Revised 4/2008 The Planning Commission shall submit a recommendation for approval to the City Council only if it makes all of the following findings: 1. The proposed amendment maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan; 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; 3. The proposed amendment would maintain the balance of land uses within the City; and 4. If the amendment is to the Land Use Plan Map (Figure LU-4), the subject property is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. Please submit a letter addressing the following questions regarding your application to amend the General Plan. Complete, accurate and thoughtful answers are required to demonstrate the appropriateness of the requested amendment. A. Identify the General Plan elements proposed to be amended. Indicate if it is text or map amendment. The following is a list of General Plan elements. X Land Use  Circulation  Green  Growth Management  Public Services and Facilities  Safety  Noise  Economic Development  Community Design  Housing B. Please describe the proposed amendment. a. Create a Mid Density (up to 27 du/ac) Residential Designation C. Why is an amendment proposed? a. To allow a residential project that has a higher density than allowed under the current General Plan designation. D. Which existing General Plan Goals and/or Policies support the proposed amendment? a. As housing demand and land values continue to rise in Orange County, the Land Use Plan identifies new areas for infill residential development that can be developed without compromising the integrity of Anaheim’s single-family neighborhoods. By strategically placing multiple-family development in appropriate areas coupled with additional guidance provided by the Community Design Element aimed at ensuring a quality multiple-family development that aims to create diverse housing opportunities for Anaheim’s equally diverse population. ATTACHMENT NO. 10 CITY OF ANAHEIM JUSTIFICATION FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Page 2 of 2 E. How will the proposed amendment improve the surrounding neighborhood and the City as a whole? a. It will provide a new revitalized living environment synergistic with the surrounding area as well as provide greater housing opportunity for both new families and young professionals alike. F. If the amendment includes a change to the Land Use Plan Map (Figure LU-4), please indicate how the subject property is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to access, topography and provision of utilities. a. The subject property contains a flat landscape suitable for 19 townhomes with street frontage that can accommodate both a smooth entrance and exit for the homeowners on the property as well as visitors. This project will fall in line with the surrounding uses of the neighboring properties who are all able to be served from a utility perspective. G. If the amendment includes a change to the Land Use Plan Map (Figure LU-4), please indicate how the change will affect the property’s compatibility with adjacent land uses. a. The property will maintain adjacent land use design guidelines to produce a positive effect in the surrounding building fabric. With multiple-family housing to both the right, left, and behind our property, our project establishes and maintains a well-balanced community. 5500 Bolsa Avenue Suite 120, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 | Tel: (714) 892‐0123 | www.bonannidevelopment.com Bonanni Development plans on creating a revitalized look to Savanna Street by facilitating the area with a new residential development on two underutilized infill parcels. As housing demand and land values continue to rise in Orange County, the Land Use Plan identifies new areas for infill residential development that can be developed without compromising the integrity of Anaheim’s single‐family neighborhoods. By strategically placing multiple‐family development in appropriate areas coupled with additional guidance provided by the Community Design Element aimed at ensuring a quality multiple‐family development creates diverse housing opportunities for Anaheim’s equally diverse population. These 19 new townhomes will blend with the surrounding land uses while creating an atmosphere of forward development and value to the area. The site proposed is more than adequate for the proposed use and will be able to satisfy all necessary needs of both the new homeowners and the neighbors alike. The proposed development contains open space for the community as well as parking that exceeds the city guidelines. According to our research of the area is clear that this new development also will in no way burden the highways and surrounding areas with a heavy flow of traffic. We feel that this development inhibits positive growth in the community and will be a welcomed addition to the city of Anaheim; all while providing a high‐quality loving environment for our residents that they can be proud of. ATTACHMENT NO. 11 8 / 1 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 3 : 8 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 28'-0" 40'-0"40'-0" ﬁ r e d e p t . h a m m e r h e a d t u r n - a r o u n d ﬁ r e d e p t . h a m m e r h e a d t u r n - a r o u n d ﬁre dept. hammerhead turn-around 2 8 ' - 0 " 8 5 ' - 6 " 2 8 ' - 0 " c o m m o n o p e n s p a c e : 3 1 3 s f c o m m o n o p e n s p a c e : 1 , 0 3 8 s f c o m m o n o p e n s p a c e : 2 , 9 2 2 s f c o m m o n o p e n s p a c e : 2 9 2 s f c o m m o n o p e n s p a c e : 2 1 4 s f c o m m o n o p e n s p a c e : 1 , 1 5 2 s f 1 5 15 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 c u r b r a m p p e r g r d ' g c u r b r a m p p e r g r d ' g c u r b r a m p p e r g r d ' g c u r b r a m p p e r g r d ' g Site plan based on parcel map dimensions onlyArchitect assumes no responsibility for its accuracyAll dimensions to be veriﬁed by certiﬁed survey scale: 1"=10'ConceptualSite Plan: Scheme 1.1 n o t e s 1 . A l l a b o v e g r o u n d u t i l i t i e s s h a l l b e l o c a t e d o u t s i d e o f s t r e e t s e t b a c k s a n d b e p r o p e r l y s c r e e n e d 2 . A l l p r o p o s e d d r i v e w a y s , s i g h t d i s t a n c e v i s a b i l i t y f o r s i g n s , l a n d s c a p i n g s h a l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d p e r S t d . D e t a i l 1 1 5 - B 3 . A l l d r i v e w a y s s h a l l h a v e a m i n . g r a d e o f 1 0 % 4 . P a r k i n g d e s i g n , i n c l u d i n g d i s a b l e d p e r s o n ' s p a r k i n g s h a l l c o n f o r m t o S t d . D e t a i l s 4 3 6 & 4 7 0 5 . L a n d s c a p e c l e a r a n c e s i n p u b l i c r i g h t - o f - w a y s h a l l c o n f o r m t o S t d . D e t a i l 5 3 0 6 . P r o v i d e 1 - t r e e f o r e v e r y 2 0 - f e e t o f f r o n t a g e , c o n s i s t e n t w i t h S e c . 1 8 . 4 6 . 0 3 0 f o r t o t a l o f m i n . 8 - t r e e s 7 . A l l c o n s t r u c t i o n t o c o n f o r m t o 2 0 1 6 C B C & 2 0 1 6 C R C 8 . R - 3 u n i t s o c c u p a n c y p e r C B C S e c . 1 0 1 . 2 & C R C S e c . R 3 0 2 . 2 f o r t o w n h o u s e s U p r i v a t e g a r a g e s o c c u p a n c y p e r C B C S e c . 3 1 2 . 1 9 . T y p e V - B c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h s p r i n k l e r s p e r N F P A 1 3 D ( T a b l e R 3 0 2 . 1 ( 2 ) t o t l o t A D A u n i t 1 A D A u n i t 2 patio patio patio t r a s h t r u c k a c c e s s n o t e s 1 . M i n i m u m w i d t h s : 2 0 ' c l e a r o f a n y g r o u n d l e v e l o r v e r t i c a l o b s t r u c t i o n 2 . M i n i m u m v e r t i c a l c l e a r a n c e : 1 4 ' - 6 " c l e a r a n c e ( o p e n t o s k y ) 3 . M i n i m u m c o r n e r c u t o f f s o r r a d i u s : 1 7 ' - 6 " i n s i d e r a d i u s & 3 7 ' - 6 " o u t s i d e r a d i u s 4 . C C R ' S / H O A : P l a n m u s t b e ﬁ l e d w i t h t h e C C R ' s f o r t h e H O A s o t h a t e a c h u n i t o w n e r i s a w a r e o f p l a c e m e n t o f t h e i r t r a s h c o n t a i n e r s f o r c o l l e c t i o n s e r v i c e s 5 . R e s i d e n t i a l b a r r e l s : S c h a e f e r , M o d e l U S D 9 5 ( 2 8 " W x 3 0 . 5 " D x 4 6 . 5 " H ) site plan legend1. 6'-0" high concrete block wall2. 3'-0" high concrete block wall3. 4'-0" wide natural color concrete walk4. natural color concrete driveway5. stamped concrete pavers6. common landscape area - HOA maintained7. 12" wide vine planter - HOA maintained8. private patio w/concrete - owner maintained9. common cluster mail boxes per USPS approval 10. common open space w/BBQ/tables/tr e l l i s 11. common open space: children's play12. 2-trash barrels per unit at collection d a y 13. 2-trash barrels per unit in garage14. line of 2nd ﬂoor or deck projection15. accessible route of travel16. 1-hr rated unit separation wall17. 8'x10' bulk item removal area w/conc. p a v e r s h o u s i n g a c c e s s i b i l i t y n o t e s : 2 0 1 6 C B C C h a p t e r 1 1 A 1 . A c c e s s i b l e s c o p e o f w o r k f o r p r i v e t l y f u n d e d h o u s i n g s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d f o r n e w l y - c o n s t r u c t e d c o v e r e d m u l t i - f a m i l y d w e l l i n g s w / 4 - o r m o r e d w e l l i n g u n i t s w / n o e l e v a t o r p e r C B C S e c . 1 1 0 2 A . 1 . 2 2 . A t l e a s t 1 0 % b u t n o t l e s s t h a n o n e u n i t s h a l l b e a c c e s s i b l e a n d a d a p t a b l e U n i t # 2 & U n i t # 3 a r e p r o p o s e d A D A u n i t s a . P r i m a r y e n t r y s h a l l b e o n a c c e s s i b l e r o u t e b . A t l e a s t 1 - p o w d e r r o o m o r b a t h s h a l l b e l o c a t e d o n p r i m a r y e n t r y l e v e l c . A l l r o o m s l o c a t e d o n p r i m a r y e n t r y l e v e l s h a l l b e s e r v e d b y a c c e s s i b l e r o u t e 3 . C o m m o n u s e a r e a s s h a l l b e s e r v e d b y a c c e s s i b l e r o u t e 4 . A c c e s s i b l e r o u t e b e t w e e n p r i m a r y e n t r y o f A D A u n i t & p a r k i n g / p u b l i c s t r e e t a . 4 ' - 0 " w i d e s i d e w a l k b . 5 % m a x . s l o p e i n d i r e c t i o n o f t r a v e l c . 2 % m a x . c r o s s s l o p e & a t c h a n g e o f d i r e c t i o n , l o a d i n g a i s l e s & l a n d i n g s A c c e s s i b l e r o u t e o f t r a v e l 1 0 35 6 8 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 133 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 89 1 4 1 4 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 14 1414 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1616 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 ﬁ r e d e p a r t m e n t n o t e s M i n . r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r ﬁ r e a c c e s s r o a d s 1 . M i n i m u m w i d t h s : a . 2 0 ' c l e a r o f a n y g r o u n d l e v e l o r v e r t i c a l o b s t r u c t i o n b . 2 4 ' w h e n p r o v i d i n g a c c e s s t o c a r p o r t s o r o p e n s p a c e s 2 . M i n i m u m v e r t i c a l c l e a r a n c e : 1 4 ' c l e a r a n c e ( o p e n t o s k y ) 3 . M i n i m u m c o r n e r c u t o f f s o r r a d i u s : a . 1 7 ' - 6 " r a d i u s w h e r e 2 0 ' w i d e a c c e s s w a y i s p r o v i d e d . R e f e r t o S t d . 1 0 6 4 . T u r n - a r o u n d a r e a s : a . H a m m e r h e a d o r T - t u r n - a r o u n d a r e a s m u s t h a v e a m i n . l a n e w i d t h o f 2 8 ' . b . T o p o f T w i l l b e 8 0 ' l o n g , 4 0 ' o f f c e n t e r i n e a c h d i r e c t i o n 5 . W e i g h t : A l l a c c e s s w a y s m u s t b e d e s i g n e d t o c a r r y t h e w e i g h t o f a 7 0 , 0 0 0 l b ﬁ r e a p p a r a t u s 6 . P r i o r t o c o m m e n c e m e n t o f s t r u c t u r a l f r a m i n g , ﬁ r e h y d r a n t s s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d a n d c h a r g e d a s r e q u i r e d a n d a p p r o v e d b y t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t 7 . F i r e h y d r a n t s s h a l l m e e t m i n . F i r e D e p a r t m e n t S p e c i ﬁ c a t i o n s a n d R e q u i r e m e n t s f o r s p a c i n g , d i s t a n c e t o s t r u c t u r e a n d a v a i l a b l e ﬁ r e ﬂ o w 8 . E m e r g e n c y v e h i c u l a r a c c e s s s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h F i r e D e p a r t m e n t S p e c i ﬁ c a t i o n s a n d R e q u i r e m e n t s F i r e D e p t . h a m m e r h e a d t u r n - a r o u n d 3 3 3 3 6 6 3 36"gate 6 7'x50'drivewayline of sighttriangle7'x50'drivewayline of sighttriangle2 236"gate36"gate36"gate S i t e P l a n A - 1 . 1 1 7 3 3 3 p o l i c e d e p t . n o t e s S e c u r i t y M e a s u r e s : 1 . R e s i d e n t i a l b l d g s . / u n i t s s h a l l b e p r e - w i r e d f o r f u t u r e i n s t a l l a t i o n o f a n a l a r m s y s t e m A d d r e s s i n g : 1 . E a c h i n d i v i d u a l b u i d l i n g a n d u n i t s h a l l b e c l e a r l y m a r k e d w i t h i t s a p p r o p r i a t e b u i l d i n g n u m b e r a n d a d d r e s s . T h e s e s h o u l d b e p o s i t i o n e d s o t h a y a r e e a s i l y v i e w e d f r o m v e h i c u l a r a n d p e d e s t r i a n p a t h w a y s t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o m p l e x . M a i n b u i l d i n g n u m b e r s s h o u l d b e a m i n . h e i g h t o f 1 2 " a n d i l l u m i n a t e d d u r i n g t h e h o u r s o f d a r k n e s s . 2 . A d d r e s s n u m b e r s s h a l l b e p o s i t i o n e d s o a s t o b e r e a d i l y r e a d a b l e f r o m t h e s t r e e t . N u m b e r s s h o u l d b e i l l u m i n a t e d d u r i n g h o u r s o f d a r k n e s s . 3 . R o o f t o p a d d r e s s n u m b e r s f o r t h e p o l i c e h e l i c o p t e r . M i n . s i z e 4 ' i n h e i g h t a n d 2 ' i n w i d t h . T h e l i n e s o f t h e n u m b e r s a r e t o b e m i n i m u m o f 6 " t h i c k . N u m b e r s s h o u l d b e s p a c e d 1 2 " t o 1 8 " a p a r t . N u m b e r s s h o u l d b e p a i n t e d o r c o n s t r u c t e d i n a c o n t r a s t i n g c o l o r t o t h e r o o f i n g m a t e r i a l . N u m b e r s s h o u l d f a c e t h e s t r e e t t o w h i c h t h e s t r u c t u r e i s a d d r e s s e d . N u m b e r s a r e n o t t o b e v i s i b l e f r o m g r o u n d l e v e l . D o o r s : 1 . A l l e x t e r i o r d o o r s t o h a v e a d e q u a t e s e c u r i t y h a r d w a r e , e . g . d e a d b o l t l o c k s . 2 . T h e l o c k s s h a l l b e s o c o n s t r u c t e d t h a t b o t h t h e d e a d b o l t a n d d e a d l o c k i n g l a t c h c a n b e r e t r a c t e d b y a s i n g l e a c t i o n o f t h e i n s i d e d o o r k n o b / l e v e r / t u r n p i e c e . 3 . W i d e - a n g l e p e e p h o l e s o r o t h e r v i e w i n g d e v i c e s h o u l d b e d e s i g n e d i n t o a l l d w e l l i n g - u n i t f r o n t d o o r s a n d a l l s o l i d d o o r s w h e r e e x t e r i o r v i s i b i l i t y i s c o m p r o m i s e d . L i g h t i n g : 1 . M o n u m e n t s i g n s a n d a d d r e s s e s s h a l l b e l i g h t e d d u r i n g h o u r s o f d a r k n e s s . 2 . A d e q u a t e l i g h t i n g o f p a r k i n g l o t s a n d a s s o c i a t e d c a r p o r t s , c i r c u l a t i o j n a r e a s , a i s l e s , p a s s a g e w a y s , r e c e s s e s , a n d g r o u n d s c o n t i g u o u s t o b u i l d i n g s s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d w i t h l i g h t i n g o f s u f f i c i e n t w a t t a g e t o p r o v i d e a d e q u a t e i l l u m i n a t i o n t o m a k e c l e a r l y v i s i b l e t h e p r e s e n c e o f a n y p e r s o n o n o r a b o u t t h e p r e m i s e s d u r i n g t h e h o u r s o f d a r k n e s s a n d p r o v i d e a s a f e , s e c u r e e n v i r o n m e n t f o r a l l p e r s o n s , p r o p e r t y a n d v e h i c l e s o n - s i t e . L a n d s c a p i n g : 1 . L a n d s c a p i n g s h a l l b e o f t h e t y p e a n d s i t u a t e d i n l o c a t i o n s t o m a x i m i z e o b s e r v a t i o n w h i l e p r o v i d i n g t h e d e s i r e d d e g r e e o f a e s t h e t i c s . S e c u r i t y p l a n t i n g m a t e r i a l s a r e e n c o u r a g e d a l o n g f e n c e a n d p r o p e r t y l i n e s a n d u n d e r v u l n e r a b l e w i n d o w s . S h r u b b e r y o r g r o u n d c o v e r s h o u l d n o t g e n e r a l l y e x c e e d t h r e e f e e t i n h e i g h t a n d t r e e b r a n c h e s s h o u l d n o t d e s c e n d b e l o w s i x f e e t f r o m t h e g r o u n d . 2 . T r e e s s h o u l d n o t b e p l a n t e d c l o s e e n o u g h t o t h e s t r u c t u r e t o a l l o w e a s y a c c e s s t o t h e r o o f , o r s h o u l d b e k e p t t r i m m e d t o m a k e c l i m b i n g d i f f i c u l t . F e n c i n g / A c c e s s C o n t r o l : 1 . P e r i m e t e r f e n c i n g s h o u l d b e u t i l i z e d w h e n e v e r p o s s i b l e t o e n h a n c e t e r r i t o r i a l r e i n f o r c e m e n t a n d c r e a t e d e f e n s i b l e s p a c e . I t s h o u l d b e a n o p e n d e s i g n , u t i l i z i n f m a t e r i a l s s u c h a s w r o u g h t i r o n o r t u b u l a r s t e e l t o m a i n t a i n n a t u r a l s u r v e i l l a n c e . 2 . P e d e s t r i a n a n d v e h i c u l a r a c c e s s c o n t r o l s h o u l d b e c o n s i d e r e d t o h e l p p r e v e n t u n w a n t e d e n t r y . N O G A T E S P R O P O S E D . 3 . D e c o r a t i v e p a v e r s s h o u l d b e u s e d a t a l l v e h i c u l a r a c c e s s p o i n t s t o e n h a n c e t e r r i t o r i a l r e i n f o r c e m e n t . L i n e o f S i g h t / N a t u r a l S u r v e i l a n c e : 1 . D o o r w a y s , a l c o v e s , e t c . , s h o u l d n o t b e r e c e s s e d t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t a p l a c e i s c r e a t e d f o r a p e r s o n t o s t a n d a n d g o u n o b s e r v e d . P a r k i n g L o t s / S t r u c t u r e s : 1 . M i n i m u m r e c o m m e n d e d l i g h t i n g l e v e l i n a l l p a r k i n g l o t s i n 0 . 5 f o o t - c a n d l e m a i n t a i n e d , m e a s u r e d a t t h e p a r k i n g s u r f a c e , w i t h a m a x i m u m t o m i n i m u m r a t i o n o g r e a t e r t h a n 1 5 : 1 . bbq swingsslide g u e s t s p a c e 4 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' g u e s t s p a c e 5 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' U n i t # 6 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 1 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 7 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 0 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 8 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 9 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y B l d g . B Unit #1 8 Plan 1A:2- b d r 1,276 s f 3-stor y U n i t # 5 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y Unit #1 9 Plan 1A:2- b d r 1,276 s f 3-stor y Unit #1 7 Plan 1A:2- b d r 1,276 s f 3-stor y Unit #1Plan 1A:2-bdr1,276 sf3-story a c c e s s i b l e p a r k i n g s t a l l g u e s t s p a c e 1 9 ' x 1 9 ' v a n a c c e s s i b l e l o a d i n g a i s l e B l d g . C B l d g . D Bldg. E g u e s t s p a c e 7 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' U n i t # 3 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y B l d g . A a d a p t a b l e p o w d e r r m a t a c c e s s i b l e u n i t s o n l y U n i t # 2 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y a d a p t a b l e p o w d e r r m a t a c c e s s i b l e u n i t s o n l y U n i t # 4 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 2 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 3 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 4 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 5 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 6 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y g u e s t s p a c e 6 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' 7'-0" g u e s t s p a c e 2 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' g u e s t s p a c e 3 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' 1 7 ' - 6 " R 24'-0"driveway 30'-0" 2 ' 62'-2" 62'-2" 41'-5" 2 ' 3 0 ' - 0 " 2 4 ' - 0 " 3 0 ' - 0 " 2 ' 1 6 ' - 1 " 2'30'-0"15'-0" 1 0 3 ' - 1 0 " 18'-10" 1 8 ' - 0 " 3 0 ' - 0 " 124'-1" 3 0 ' - 0 " 2 4 ' - 0 " 2 ' 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " d r i v e w a y d r i v e w a y 1 7 ' - 6 " R 8'-6" 14" 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 6 ' - 0 " 15'-5 12" 1 1 2 ' - 1 " 24" 8'-0" 12'-0" 1 8 ' - 0 " 30'-0" driveway 7'-4 12"8'-0"14'-8" 28" 5'-0"4'-0"6'-0" 16'-7 12"16'-6 12"20'-1"15'-2 12"7'-0"50'-0"15'-4 12"10'-0" R 10'-0" R 24'-2 12" 4'-4"16'-3 12" 18'-3" 15'-1" 15'-2 12" 1 4 ' - 6 " 1 4 ' - 0 1 2 " 4 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 5'-0"4'-0"8'-6"8'-6" 9'-0"8'-0" 1 9 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 6 " 14'-2" 5'-0"20" 20"8'-6"5'-0" 16'-6"45'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0"22'-0" clear open to sky 9 ' - 6 " 9 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 1 3 ' - 5 " 9 " 5 ' - 0 " 4'-0" p r o p e r t y l i n e 2 1 3 . 5 4 ' p r o p e r t y l i n e 2 1 3 . 6 4 ' property line 158.35' property line 158.54' Savanna Street e x i s t i n g b l d g . 20'-0"8'-0"4'-0"32'-0"parkwaysidewalkparkwaysidewalk d e v e l o p m e n t s u m m a r y d e n s i t y 1 , 7 8 1 s q . f t . / u n i t : 1 9 - u n i t s s i t e a r e a 3 3 , 8 4 1 s q . f t . ( . 7 8 a c r e s ) d e v e l o p m e n t s t a n d a r d p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t R M - 3 . 5 z o n e s t a n d a r d s 3 0 , 4 0 0 s q . f t . 1 , 6 0 0 s q . f t . / u n i t : 2 1 . 1 5 - u n i t s b u i l d i n g h e i g h t 3 6 ' - 7 " ( 3 - s t o r y b l d g . ) 4 0 ' - 0 " o r 3 - s t o r i e s f l o o r a r e a s i t e c o v e r a g e 5 0 % ( 1 6 , 9 2 0 s q . f t . ) 3 5 % ( 1 1 , 8 2 1 s q . f t . ) r e c r e a t i o n - l e a s u r e a r e a t o t a l c o m m o n : 5 , 9 3 1 s q . f t . ( 3 1 2 s q . f t . / u n i t ) 9 ' - 0 " m i n . d i m e n s i o n s @ B l d g . B : * r e q u i r e s 1 0 % a d m i n . a d j u s t m e n t S a v a n n a S t . ( f r o n t ) s e t b a c k a b u t t i n g p u b l i c s t r e e t : 1 5 f e e t 1 5 ' - 2 " i n t e r i o r s e t b a c k * C U P s t d s . m o d i f i c a t i o n 3 - s t o r y p r i m a r y w a l l s : 2 0 f e e t * 1 5 ' - 0 " : 3 - s t o r y B l d g . A p r i m a r y w a l l s * 1 4 ' - 0 " : 3 - s t o r y B l d g . B p r i m a r y w a l l s p a r k i n g 1 9 x 2 . 2 5 / u n i t : 4 3 - s p a c e s g u e s t p a r k i n g : ( 0 . 2 5 ) s p a c e / d w e l l i n g u n i t = 5 - s p a c e s ( 1 9 ) 2 - c a r g a r a g e s : 3 8 - s p a c e s o n - s i t e o p e n g u e s t s p a c e s : 7 - s p a c e s t o t a l p a r k i n g s p a c e s : 4 5 - s p a c e s s e t b a c k s b e t w e e n b l d g s . * C U P s t d s . m o d i f i c a t i o n 3 - s t o r y p r i m a r y w a l l s : 4 0 f e e t * 2 0 ' - 0 " : B l d g . B t o B l d g . C p r i m a r y w a l l s * 1 3 ' - 5 " : B l d g . C t o B l d g . D p r i m a r y w a l l s * 2 0 ' - 0 " : B l d g . D t o B l d g . E p r i m a r y w a l l s p l a n 1 A ( 1 4 - u n i t s ) : 1 , 2 7 6 s q . f t . ( 2 - b d r m s ) p l a n 1 B ( 5 - u n i t s ) : 1 , 2 6 8 s q . f t . ( 2 - b d r m s ) t o t a l ( 1 9 - u n i t s ) : 2 4 , 2 0 4 s q . f t . 2 - b e d r o o m u n i t s : 8 2 5 s q . f t . s i t e l a n d s c a p e a r e a 3 1 . 2 % ( 1 0 , 5 8 4 s q . f t . ) i n d i c a t e s c o m m o n r e c r e a t i o n - l e a s u r e a r e a w / m i n . d i m . 1 0 ' - 0 " 2 7 5 s q . f t . / u n i t = 5 , 2 2 5 s q . f t . l o t w i d t h 1 5 8 . 3 5 ' 7 0 . 0 0 ' l a n d s c a p e p o r t i o n o f s e t b a c k : 5 f e e t A T T A C H M E N T N O . 1 2 9 / 1 3 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 3 : 8 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 trash truck hammerhead turn-around 20'-0"29'-0" t r a s h t r u c k h a m m e r h e a d t u r n - a r o u n d t r a s h t r u c k h a m m e r h e a d t u r n - a r o u n d 2 5 ' - 0 " 2 5 ' - 0 " 25'-0" S o l i d W a s t e M a n a g e m e n t P l a n A - 1 . 2 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 3 Site plan based on parcel map dimensions onlyArchitect assumes no responsibility for its accuracyAll dimensions to be veriﬁed by certiﬁed survey scale: 1"=10'ConceptualSite Plan: Scheme 1.1 t r a s h t r u c k a c c e s s n o t e s 1 . M i n i m u m w i d t h s : 2 0 ' c l e a r o f a n y g r o u n d l e v e l o r v e r t i c a l o b s t r u c t i o n 2 . M i n i m u m v e r t i c a l c l e a r a n c e : 1 4 ' - 6 " c l e a r a n c e ( o p e n t o s k y ) 3 . M i n i m u m c o r n e r c u t o f f s o r r a d i u s : 1 7 ' - 6 " i n s i d e r a d i u s & 3 7 ' - 6 " o u t s i d e r a d i u s 4 . C C & R ' S / H O A : P l a n m u s t b e ﬁ l e d w i t h t h e C C R ' s f o r t h e H O A s o t h a t e a c h u n i t o w n e r i s a w a r e o f p l a c e m e n t o f t h e i r t r a s h c o n t a i n e r s f o r c o l l e c t i o n s e r v i c e s 5 . R e s i d e n t i a l b a r r e l s : S c h a e f e r , M o d e l U S D 9 5 ( 2 8 " W x 3 0 . 5 " D x 4 6 . 5 " H ) s i t e p l a n l e g e n d 1 . 6 ' - 0 " h i g h c o n c r e t e b l o c k w a l l 2 . 3 ' - 0 " h i g h c o n c r e t e b l o c k w a l l 3 . 4 ' - 0 " w i d e n a t u r a l c o l o r c o n c r e t e w a l k 4 . n a t u r a l c o l o r c o n c r e t e d r i v e w a y 5 . s t a m p e d c o n c r e t e p a v e r s 6 . c o m m o n l a n d s c a p e a r e a - H O A m a i n t a i n e d 7 . 1 2 " w i d e v i n e p l a n t e r - H O A m a i n t a i n e d 8 . p r i v a t e p a t i o w / c o n c r e t e - o w n e r m a i n t a i n e d 9 . c o m m o n c l u s t e r m a i l b o x e s p e r U S P S a p p r o v a l u n i t # 1 1 1 2 u n i t # 1 0 1 2 unit #18 12unit #19 12unit #17 12 u n i t # 1 6 1 2 u n i t # 1 4 1 2 u n i t # 1 5 1 2 u n i t # 5 u n i t # 4 u n i t # 3 u n i t # 2 12 unit #1 u n i t # 6 u n i t # 7 u n i t # 8 u n i t # 9 1 7 1 0 . c o m m o n o p e n s p a c e w / B B Q / t a b l e s / t r e l l i s 1 1 . c o m m o n o p e n s p a c e : c h i l d r e n ' s p l a y 1 2 . 2 - t r a s h b a r r e l s p e r u n i t a t c o l l e c t i o n d a y 1 3 . 2 - t r a s h b a r r e l s p e r u n i t i n g a r a g e 1 4 . l i n e o f 2 n d ﬂ o o r o r d e c k p r o j e c t i o n 1 5 . a c c e s s i b l e r o u t e o f t r a v e l 1 6 . 1 - h r r a t e d u n i t s e p a r a t i o n w a l l 1 7 . 8 ' x 1 0 ' b u l k i t e m r e m o v a l a r e a w / c o n c . p a v e r s T r a s h t r u c k h a m m e r h e a d t u r n - a r o u n d 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 13 1 3 1 3 t r a s h t r u c k r o u t e : e n t e r t r a s h t r u c k r o u t e : l e a v e u n i t # 1 3 1 2 u n i t # 1 2 1 2 bbq swingsslide g u e s t s p a c e 4 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' g u e s t s p a c e 5 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' U n i t # 6 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 1 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 7 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 0 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 8 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 9 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y B l d g . B Unit #1 8 Plan 1A:2- b d r 1,276 s f 3-stor y U n i t # 5 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y Unit #1 9 Plan 1A:2- b d r 1,276 s f 3-stor y Unit #1 7 Plan 1A:2- b d r 1,276 s f 3-stor y Unit #1Plan 1A:2-bdr1,276 sf3-story a c c e s s i b l e p a r k i n g s t a l l g u e s t s p a c e 1 9 ' x 1 9 ' v a n a c c e s s i b l e l o a d i n g a i s l e B l d g . C B l d g . D Bldg. E g u e s t s p a c e 7 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' U n i t # 3 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y B l d g . A a d a p t a b l e p o w d e r r m a t a c c e s s i b l e u n i t s o n l y U n i t # 2 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y a d a p t a b l e p o w d e r r m a t a c c e s s i b l e u n i t s o n l y U n i t # 4 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 2 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 3 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 4 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 5 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 6 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y g u e s t s p a c e 6 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' 7'-0" g u e s t s p a c e 2 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' g u e s t s p a c e 3 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' 1 7 ' - 6 " R 24'-0"driveway 30'-0" 2 ' 62'-2" 62'-2" 41'-5" 2 ' 3 0 ' - 0 " 2 4 ' - 0 " 3 0 ' - 0 " 2 ' 1 6 ' - 1 " 2'30'-0"15'-0" 1 0 3 ' - 1 0 " 18'-10" 1 8 ' - 0 " 3 0 ' - 0 " 124'-1" 3 0 ' - 0 " 2 4 ' - 0 " 2 ' 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " d r i v e w a y d r i v e w a y 1 7 ' - 6 " R 8'-6" 14" 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 6 ' - 0 " 15'-5 12" 1 1 2 ' - 1 " 24" 8'-0" 12'-0" 1 8 ' - 0 " 30'-0" driveway 7'-4 12"8'-0"14'-8" 28" 5'-0"4'-0"6'-0" 16'-7 12"16'-6 12"20'-1"15'-2 12"7'-0"50'-0"15'-4 12"10'-0" R 10'-0" R 24'-2 12" 4'-4"16'-3 12" 18'-3" 15'-1" 15'-2 12" 1 4 ' - 6 " 1 4 ' - 0 1 2 " 4 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 5'-0"4'-0"8'-6"8'-6" 9'-0"8'-0" 1 9 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 6 " 14'-2" 5'-0"20" 20"8'-6"5'-0" 16'-6"45'-0" 3'-0" 3'-0"22'-0" clear open to sky 9 ' - 6 " 9 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 1 3 ' - 5 " 9 " 5 ' - 0 " 4'-0" p r o p e r t y l i n e 2 1 3 . 5 4 ' p r o p e r t y l i n e 2 1 3 . 6 4 ' property line 158.35' property line 158.54' Savanna Street e x i s t i n g b l d g . 20'-0"8'-0"4'-0"32'-0"parkwaysidewalkparkwaysidewalk s o l i d w a s t e m a n a g e m e n t p l a n t y p i c a l b u i l d i n g d e t a i l r e s i d e n t i a l b a r r e l s : S c h a e f e r , M o d e l U S D 9 5 2 8 " w i d e x 3 0 . 5 " d e e p x 4 6 . 5 " h i g h d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " u p 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 2 8 " 1 8 " 2 8 " 1 8 " 2 8 " 1 8 " 2 8 " 30.5" 2 n d ﬂ o o r a b o v e 1 2 " p l a n t e r 2 n d ﬂ o o r a b o v e 2 n d ﬂ o o r a b o v e 2 8 " 1 8 " 2 8 " 30.5" a r c h i t e c t u r a l p r o j e c t i o n a b o v e : 1 6 " 20'-0" trash truck access road clear to sky 20'-0" trash truck access road clear to sky ( 2 ) t r a s h b a r r e l s ( 2 ) t r a s h b a r r e l s ( 2 ) t r a s h b a r r e l s 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " B l d g . A : P l a n 1 A ( 1 , 2 7 6 s f ) A - 2 . 1 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 0 3 ' - 1 0 " 2'-6"30'-0"2'-0"1'-2"1'-4"32'-0" 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 4 " 1'-4" 1 0 3 ' - 1 0 " First Fl o o r P l a n : 1 4 8 s f / u n i t Secon d F l o o r P l a n : 5 8 2 s f / u n i t d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h d w r e f r i g d n . e a t i n g c o u n t e r w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k d w r e f r i g d n . w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k e a t i n g c o u n t e r d w r e f r i g d n . e a t i n g c o u n t e r w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k d w r e f r i g d n . e a t i n g c o u n t e r w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k d w r e f r i g d n . e a t i n g c o u n t e r w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h a d a p t a b l e p o w d e r r m a t a c c e s s i b l e u n i t s o n l y d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h a d a p t a b l e p o w d e r r m a t a c c e s s i b l e u n i t s o n l y d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " B l d g . A : P l a n 1 A ( 1 , 2 7 6 s f ) A - 2 . 2 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 0 3 ' - 1 0 " 30'-0"2'-0"1'-4"1'-4" 1 ' - 4 " Third F l o o r P l a n : 5 5 4 s f / u n i t d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t wal k - i n m.cl o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " be d r m 2 11' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9'0" c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g Roof Pl a n ( 5 : 1 2 s l o p e ) s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 Bldg. A: West-Entry Side Elevation 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"36'-7"top platetop of slab top plate 2nd ﬂoor 3rd ﬂoor top platebldg. height e n t r y d o o r w / w i n d o w p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / g r i d s e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e vinyl windoww/plasterfoam trim p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r inset vinylslider w/grids deco.w.i.guardrail@ deck plaster foamtrim A - 2 . 3 B l d g . A : E l e v a t i o n s stoneveneerdeco.vents d e c o . p l a s t e r c h i m n e y v i n y l w i n d o w w / d e c o . w . i . p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s d e c o . w o o d p l a n t s h e l f d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 Bldg. A: East-Driveway Elevation 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"36'-7"top platetop of garage curb top plate 2nd ﬂoor 3rd ﬂoor top platebldg. height r o l l - u p g a r a g e d o o r w / g l a s s p a n e l s e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m deco. plasterfoam corbel i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / g r i d s d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m A - 2 . 4 B l d g . A : E l e v a t i o n s s t o n e v e n e e r d e c o . p l a s t e r c h i m n e y p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s deco.woodtrellis deco.vents p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 Bldg. A: Sout h - S i d e E l e v a t i o n B l d g . A : N o r t h - S a v a n n a S t . E l e v a t i o n 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 36'-7" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e 2 n d ﬂ o o r 2 n d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e bldg. height bldg. height e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r exteriorplaster s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r A - 2 . 5 B l d g . A : E l e v a t i o n s s t o n e v e n e e r stoneveneer p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l plaste r f a s c i a w/dec o . f o a m plaste r c o r b e l deco.woodtrellis C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " B l d g . B : P l a n 1 A ( 1 , 2 7 6 s f ) A - 3 . 1 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 20'-8"1" 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 2 4 ' - 5 " 2'-6"30'-0"2'-0"20'-8"1" 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 ' - 4 " 1'-4" 1 2 4 ' - 5 " 1'-2"1'-4"32'-0"First Floor Plan: 148 sf/unit Second Floor Plan: 582 sf/unitden/ofﬁce8'10"x11'0"up 2-car garage20'0"x20'0"9'0" clg 9'0" clg trashtrash d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g trashtrash d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h d w r e f r i g dn. e a t i n g c o u n t e r walk-inpantrypwd g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8'0" clg 8'0" clg d e c k d w r e f r i g d n . e a t i n g c o u n t e r w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k dwrefrigdn.walk-inpantrypwdgreat rm14'4"x21'0"kitchen10'0"x14'2"up gasf.p.9'0" clg 9'0" clg8'0" clg 8'0" clgdeckeating counter d w r e f r i g d n . w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k e a t i n g c o u n t e r d w r e f r i g d n . e a t i n g c o u n t e r w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k d w r e f r i g d n . e a t i n g c o u n t e r w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " B l d g . B : P l a n 1 A ( 1 , 2 7 6 s f ) A - 3 . 2 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 20'-8"1" 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 2 4 ' - 5 " 30'-0"2'-0"1'-4" 1 ' - 4 " 1'-4"Third Floor Plan: 554 sf/unit dryerwasherbath 2walk-incloset walk-inm.closet m.bedroom11'0"x14'2"bedrm 211'0"x11'4"twhdn.9'0" clg9'0" clg m.bath9'0" clg9'0" clg 9'0" clg 9'0" clg d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g dryerwa s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h dn. 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m.bath 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9'0" clg d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g Roof Plan (5:12 slope) s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 Bldg. B: South-Entry Side Elevatio n 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"36'-7"top platetop of slab top plate 2nd ﬂoor 3rd ﬂoor top platebldg. height e n t r y d o o r w / w i n d o w p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / g r i d s e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e vinyl windoww/plasterfoam trim p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r inset vinylslider w/grids deco.w.i.guardrail@ deck plaster foamtrim A - 3 . 3 B l d g . B : E l e v a t i o n s stoneveneerdeco.vents d e c o . p l a s t e r c h i m n e y v i n y l w i n d o w w / d e c o . w . i . p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s d e c o . w o o d p l a n t s h e l f d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 Bldg. B: North-Driveway Elevation 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"36'-7"top platetop of garage curb top plate 2nd ﬂoor 3rd ﬂoor top platebldg. height r o l l - u p g a r a g e d o o r w / g l a s s p a n e l s e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / g r i d s d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m A - 3 . 4 B l d g . B : E l e v a t i o n s s t o n e v e n e e r d e c o . p l a s t e r c h i m n e y p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s deco.vents p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 Bldg. B: East- S i d e E l e v a t i o n B l d g . B : W e s t - S i d e E l e v a t i o n 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 36'-7" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e 2 n d ﬂ o o r 2 n d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e bldg. height bldg. height e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r exteriorplaster s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r A - 3 . 5 B l d g . B : E l e v a t i o n s s t o n e v e n e e r stoneveneer p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l plaster f a s c i a w/deco. f o a m plaster c o r b e l C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " B l d g . C : P l a n 1 B ( 1 , 2 6 8 s f ) A - 4 . 1 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 4 1 ' - 5 " 1'-4" 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 ' - 4 " 4 1 ' - 5 " 1'-4"30'-0"2'-0" 1'-4"30'-0"12"12" 1 ' - 4 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 ' - 4 " 4 1 ' - 5 " 1'-4"30'-0"12"12" F i r s t F l o o r P l a n : 1 4 8 s f / u n i t S e c o n d F l o o r P l a n : 5 7 1 s f / u n i t d w r e f r i g d n . p w d l i v i n g k i t c h e n u p g a s f . p . d i n e pantry d w r e f r i g d n . p w d l i v i n g k i t c h e n u p g a s f . p . d i n e pantry d w r e f r i g d n . p w d l i v i n g k i t c h e n u p g a s f . p . d i n e pantry d e n / o f ﬁ c e 2 - c a r g a r a g e u p t r a s h t r a s h d e n / o f ﬁ c e 2 - c a r g a r a g e u p t r a s h t r a s h Thir d F l o o r P l a n : 5 5 1 s f / u n i t b a t h m a s t e r c l o s e t m a s t e r b e d r o o m b e d r o o m 2 d n . W D m . b a t h b a t h m a s t e r c l o s e t m a s t e r b e d r o o m b e d r o o m 2 d n . W D m . b a t h Roo f P l a n ( 5 : 1 2 s l o p e ) s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 B l d g . C : N o r t h - E n t r y S i d e E l e v a t i o n Bldg. C: South-Driveway Elevati o n 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p o f s l a b t o p p l a t e 2 n d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e bldg. height 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"36'-7"top platetop of slab top plate 2nd ﬂoor 3rd ﬂoor top platebldg. height e n t r y d o o r w / w i n d o w p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r A - 4 . 2 B l d g . C : E l e v a t i o n s s t o n e v e n e e r p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l v i n y l w i n d o w w / d e c o . w . i . d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / g r i d s roll-up garagedoor w/glasspanels s-proﬁle conc.tile rooﬁng5:12 slope vinyl windoww/plaster foamplant-on exteriorplaster p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l inset vinylwindow w/grids d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r s t o n e v e n e e r p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 B l d g . C : E a s t - S i d e E l e v a t i o n Bldg. C: W e s t - S i d e E l e v a t i o n 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 36'-7" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e 2 n d ﬂ o o r 2 n d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e bldg. height bldg. height s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l deco. pl a s t e r foam c o r b e l A - 4 . 3 B l d g . C : E l e v a t i o n s s t o n e v e n e e r s t o n e v e n e e r p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " B l d g . D : P l a n 1 B ( 1 , 2 6 8 s f ) A - 5 . 1 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 F i r s t F l o o r P l a n : 1 4 8 s f / u n i t S e c o n d F l o o r P l a n : 5 7 1 s f / u n i t 1 ' - 4 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 4 " 6 2 ' - 4 " 1'-4"30'-0"2'-0" d e n / o f ﬁ c e 2 - c a r g a r a g e u p t r a s h t r a s h d e n / o f ﬁ c e 2 - c a r g a r a g e u p t r a s h t r a s h d e n / o f ﬁ c e 2 - c a r g a r a g e u p t r a s h t r a s h 1 ' - 4 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 4 " 6 2 ' - 4 " 1'-4"30'-0"2'-0" d w r e f r i g d n . p w d l i v i n g k i t c h e n u p g a s f . p . d i n e pantry d w r e f r i g d n . p w d l i v i n g k i t c h e n u p g a s f . p . d i n e pantry d w r e f r i g d n . p w d l i v i n g k i t c h e n u p g a s f . p . d i n e pantry s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " B l d g . D : P l a n 1 B ( 1 , 2 6 8 s f ) A - 5 . 2 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 4 " 6 2 ' - 4 " 1'-4"30'-0"12"12" b a t h m a s t e r c l o s e t m a s t e r b e d r o o m b e d r o o m 2 d n . W D m . b a t h b a t h m a s t e r c l o s e t m a s t e r b e d r o o m b e d r o o m 2 d n . W D m . b a t h b a t h m a s t e r c l o s e t m a s t e r b e d r o o m b e d r o o m 2 d n . W D m . b a t h T h i r d F l o o r P l a n : 5 5 1 s f / u n i t R o o f P l a n ( 5 : 1 2 s l o p e ) s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 B l d g . D : S o u t h - E n t r y S i d e E l e v a t i o n e n t r y d o o r w / w i n d o w p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / g r i d s e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r s - p r o f i l e c o n c . t i l e r o o f i n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r s t o n e v e n e e r p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s v i n y l w i n d o w w / d e c o . w . i . d e c o . v e n t s d e c o . w o o d p l a n t s h e l f d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s d e c o . p l a s t e r c h i m n e y 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p o f s l a b t o p p l a t e 2 n d f l o o r 3 r d f l o o r t o p p l a t e bldg. height A - 5 . 3 B l d g . D : E l e v a t i o n s C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 B l d g . D : N o r t h - D r i v e w a y E l e v a t i o n e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r r o l l - u p g a r a g e d o o r w / g l a s s p a n e l s s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / g r i d s d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m s t o n e v e n e e r p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s d e c o . p l a s t e r c h i m n e y d e c o . v e n t s p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p p l a t e 2 n d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e bldg. height A - 5 . 4 B l d g . D : E l e v a t i o n s C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 Bldg. D: Wes t - S i d e E l e v a t i o n B l d g . D : E a s t - S i d e E l e v a t i o n s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l s t o n e v e n e e r p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m deco. pl a s t e r foam c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r s t o n e v e n e e r p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l s-proﬁle conc.tile rooﬁng5:12 slope 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"36'-7"top platetop of garage curb top plate 2nd ﬂoor 3rd ﬂoor top platebldg. height 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p p l a t e 2 n d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e bldg. height A - 5 . 5 B l d g . D : E l e v a t i o n s C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " B l d g . E : P l a n 1 A ( 1 , 2 7 6 s f ) A - 6 . 1 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 30'-0" 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 1 0 " 6 2 ' - 4 " 1'-4"32'-0" 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 1 0 " 6 2 ' - 4 " 1'-2"2'-6"2'-0" 1 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 4 " F i r s t F l o o r P l a n : 1 4 8 s f / u n i t S e c o n d F l o o r P l a n : 5 8 2 s f / u n i t d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h d w r e f r i g d n . e a t i n g c o u n t e r w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k d w r e f r i g d n . w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k e a t i n g c o u n t e r d w r e f r i g d n . e a t i n g c o u n t e r w a l k - i n p a n t r y p w d g r e a t r m 1 4 ' 4 " x 2 1 ' 0 " k i t c h e n 1 0 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " u p g a s f . p . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g 8 ' 0 " c l g d e c k d e n / o f ﬁ c e 8 ' 1 0 " x 1 1 ' 0 " u p 2 - c a r g a r a g e 2 0 ' 0 " x 2 0 ' 0 " 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g t r a s h t r a s h s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " B l d g . E : P l a n 1 A ( 1 , 2 7 6 s f ) A - 6 . 2 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 5 : 0 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 1'-4"30'-0"12"12" 1 ' - 4 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 8 " 1 " 2 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 4 " 6 2 ' - 4 " T h i r d F l o o r P l a n : 5 5 4 s f / u n i t d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g d r y e r w a s h e r b a t h 2 w a l k - i n c l o s e t w a l k - i n m . c l o s e t m . b e d r o o m 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 4 ' 2 " b e d r m 2 1 1 ' 0 " x 1 1 ' 4 " t w h d n . 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g m . b a t h 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g 9 ' 0 " c l g R o o f P l a n ( 5 : 1 2 s l o p e ) s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 5 : 0 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 B l d g . E : N o r t h - S a v a n n a S t . E l e v a t i o n 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p o f s l a b t o p p l a t e 2 n d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r bldg. height e n t r y d o o r w / w i n d o w p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / g r i d s e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r d e c o . w . i . g u a r d r a i l @ d e c k A - 6 . 3 B l d g . E : E l e v a t i o n s s t o n e v e n e e r d e c o . p l a s t e r c h i m n e y v i n y l w i n d o w w / d e c o . w . i . p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s d e c o . v e n t s d e c o . w o o d p l a n t s h e l f d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e 2-car garageden great rm m.bedrm 2 n d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e t o p o f s l a b kitchen m.closetbedrm 2 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1" 3 r d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e Building Section s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 B l d g . E : S o u t h - D r i v e w a y E l e v a t i o n 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p p l a t e 2 n d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e bldg. height r o l l - u p g a r a g e d o o r w / g l a s s p a n e l s e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / g r i d s d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m A - 6 . 4 B l d g . E : E l e v a t i o n s s t o n e v e n e e r p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s d e c o . p l a s t e r c h i m n e y d e c o . v e n t s p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e s c a l e : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 / 1 4 / 1 8 BONANNI DEVELOPMENT5500 BOLSA AVE #120HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649714-892-0123BEGOVICH Architectskaz@begovich-haug.com310-701-7152 S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 1 9 - u n i t C o n d o m i n i u m P r o j e c t 3 5 3 4 - 3 5 3 8 S a v a n n a S t r e e t A n a h e i m , C A r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 Bldg. E: West-Side El e v a t i o n B l d g . E : E a s t - S i d e E l e v a t i o n 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 9'-1" 36'-7" 36'-7" t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p o f g a r a g e c u r b t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e 2 n d ﬂ o o r 2 n d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r 3 r d ﬂ o o r t o p p l a t e t o p p l a t e bldg. height bldg. height e x t e r i o r p l a s t e r exteriorplaster s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e s - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e r o o ﬁ n g 5 : 1 2 s l o p e i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w i n s e t v i n y l w i n d o w w / p l a s t e r f o a m p l a n t - o n p l a s t e r f o a m t r i m plasterfoam trim d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . p l a s t e r f o a m c o r b e l d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r d e c o . w o o d s h u t t e r A - 6 . 5 B l d g . E : E l e v a t i o n s s t o n e v e n e e r stoneveneer p l a s t e r f a s c i a w / d e c o . f o a m p l a s t e r c o r b e l plaster fasciaw/deco. foamplaster corbel deco.woodtrellis C o l o r & M a t e r i a l B o a r d L e g e n d R o o f t i l e E a g l e R o o ﬁ n g S - p r o ﬁ l e c o n c . t i l e C a p i s t r a n o 3 1 2 4 H i l o S u n s e t E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( ﬁ e l d ) O m e g a 1 0 W h i t e E x t e r i o r p l a s t e r ( t r i m s / i n s e t s ) O m e g a 2 0 I v o r y D e c o . w o o d t r e l l i s + f r o n t d o o r B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 1 6 E a r t h C h i c o r y D e c o . s h u t t e r s B e h r P a i n t s Q E - 3 9 W i l l o w L e a f S t o n e v e n e e r E l D o r a d o S t o n e P a g o s a S p r i n g s - S t a c k e d S t o n e e x i s t i n g s i n g l e f a m i l y h o m e # 3 e x i s t i n g s i n g l e f a m i l y h o m e # 1 e x i s t i n g s i n g l e f a m i l y h o m e # 2 e x i s t i n g m u l t i - f a m i l y p r o j e c t e x i s t i n g m u l t i - f a m i l y p r o j e c t e x i s t i n g m u l t i - f a m i l y p r o j e c t o p e n s p a c e 4 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' o p e n s p a c e 5 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' U n i t # 6 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 1 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 7 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 0 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 8 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 9 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y B l d g . B Unit #18Plan 1A:2-bdr1,276 sf3-storyUnit #19Plan 1A:2-bdr1,276 sf3-story Unit #17Plan 1A:2-bdr1,276 sf3-story a c c e s s i b l e p a r k i n g s t a l l o p e n s p a c e 1 9 ' x 1 9 ' v a n a c c e s s i b l e l o a d i n g a i s l e B l d g . C Bldg . D Bldg. E o p e n s p a c e 7 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' U n i t # 5 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y Unit #1Plan 1A:2-bdr1,276 sf3-story Unit #3Plan 1A:2-bdr1,276 sf3-storyBldg. Aadaptablepowder rmataccessibleunitsonly Unit #2Plan 1A:2-bdr1,276 sf3-storyadaptablepowder rmataccessibleunitsonly U n i t # 4 P l a n 1 A : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 7 6 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 2 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y U n i t # 1 3 P l a n 1 B : 2 - b d r 1 , 2 6 8 s f 3 - s t o r y Unit # 1 4 Plan 1B:2- b d r 1,268 s f 3-st o r y Unit # 1 5 Plan 1B:2- b d r 1,268 s f 3-st o r y Unit # 1 6 Plan 1B:2- b d r 1,268 s f 3-st o r y o p e n s p a c e 6 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' o p e n s p a c e 2 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' o p e n s p a c e 3 8 ' 6 " x 1 8 ' PROPO S E D S A V A N N A TOWNH O M E P R O J E C T Savanna Street S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 19-unitCondominiu m P r o j e c t 3534-3538 Sav a n n a S t r e e t Anaheim, CA A d j a c e n t P r o p e r t y P l a n s c a l e : 1 " = 5 0 ' 1 B 2 A 2 l i n e - o f - s i g h t line-of-sight r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 18'-10" 8 5 ' - 0 " a p p r o x w a l l + w i n d o w s 1 1 5 ' - 0 " a p p r o x w a l l + w i n d o w s 1 1 9 ' - 0 " a p p r o x w a l l + w i n d o w s S a v a n n a T o w n h o m e s 19-unitCondominiu m P r o j e c t 3534-3538 Sav a n n a S t r e e t Anaheim, CA L i n e - o f - s i g h t s c a l e : 1 / 1 6 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 r e v i s i o n 1 : 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 8 r e v i s i o n 2 : 5 - 0 1 - 2 0 1 8 2-car garage great rm bedrmbath2nd ﬂoor top platetop platetop of slab 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"3rd ﬂoor top plate 1 8 ' - 1 0 " 8 5 ' - 0 " a p p r o x . 2-car garage great rm bedrmbath2nd ﬂoor top platetop platetop of slab 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"3rd ﬂoor top plate 1 8 ' - 1 0 " 1 1 5 ' - h o m e # 2 ( 1 1 9 ' - h o m e # 3 ) - 0 " a p p r o x . Bldg. B: Line - o f - S i g h t S e c t i o n A - A Bldg. B: Line - o f - S i g h t S e c t i o n B - B s e c o n d ﬂ o o r : l i n e - o f - s i g h t 1 5 d e g r e e s p r o p o s e d 6 ' h i g h b l o c k w a l l s i n g l e f a m i l y h o m e # 1 p r o p o s e d 6 ' h i g h b l o c k w a l l t h i r d ﬂ o o r : l i n e - o f - s i g h t 1 5 d e g r e e s s e c o n d ﬂ o o r : l i n e - o f - s i g h t 1 5 d e g r e e s t h i r d ﬂ o o r : l i n e - o f - s i g h t 1 5 d e g r e e s s e t b a c k s e t b a c k s i n g l e f a m i l y h o m e # 2 / # 3 p r o p o s e d p r i v a c y v e g e t a t i o n : 2 4 " b o x A f r i c a n S u m a c t r e e 2 5 ' - 3 0 ' h i g h p r o p o s e d p r i v a c y v e g e t a t i o n : 2 4 " b o x A f r i c a n S u m a c t r e e 2 5 ' - 3 0 ' h i g h ATTACHMENT NO. 14 1 Nicholas J. Taylor From:jonathan mcgrauth <jonathan_mcgrauth@yahoo.com> Sent:Friday, September 21, 2018 4:44 PM To:Nicholas J. Taylor Subject:Development Project No. 2017-00094 Afternoon Mr. Taylor, I am against turning a two single family residence into a 19 unit complex. At the moment parking in the area is already difficult due to the non enforcement of the current apartment complex located across the street to verify that family sizes do not exceed the amount allowed. Already we are seeing residents park on Mt. Waterman Drive and walking over to West Savannah Street. I fear that cramming even more people in that area will hurt the value of my property. Is there a formal process to abide too to speak at the Public Hearing on 15 October or is it just an open session? Thank you. Jonathan McGrauth 760-979-6015 Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone ATTACHMENT NO. 15 1 Nicholas J. Taylor From:Jenny Ngo <ngodjen@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 02, 2018 5:37 PM To:Nicholas J. Taylor Subject:Comments on Savanna Townhomes Project No. 2017-00094 Good Afternoon Mr. Nick Taylor, My name is Jennie Ngo and I am a residence at address 839 S. Marian Way, Anaheim, CA 92804. I have concerns/comments regarding the proposed townhome complex which will be built on 3534 W Savanna Street. There are many apartment buildings on Savanna street. At this time, We already don’t have enough parkings for residences on Marian way since people from the apartments park in front of our houses. The new townhomes will have 19 units with two bedrooms in each units. However, there are only two assigned parkings for each unit. Do you agree with me that each unit might have at least four people and there will be four cars for each unit? So where can the two extra cars be parked? I also worry about the safety on Savanna street. In late afternoon to evening, people just park their cars in middle of the street, turn on emergency lights and block the street. This situation indicates the lack of parkings. With 19 additional units, there will be more people access Savanna street, the street is already hard to get through. Mr. Nick Taylor, please consider our safety and parkings when making decisions regarding Savanna Townhomes project. Would you please let me know how my neighbors can raise their concerns and how our voice can be heard? We are very worry. I appreciate that you read my comments. Thank you very much. Have a great day. Sincerely, Jennie Ngo N E W C O R R E S P O N D E N C E - I T E M N O . 3 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2018 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 LOCATION: 201 East Broadway (River Church) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is River Church represented by Rob Owen. The property owner is Favorday, also represented by Rob Owen. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to permit and retain an existing church, performing arts theater, restaurant with sales of beer and wine for on-site consumption, accessory retail store, and off-site parking within an existing performing arts theater building. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05840. BACKGROUND: The 1.06-acre property is developed with a 48,873 square foot performing arts theater building. The property is located within the "C-G" General Commercial zone and the General Plan designates the property for General Commercial land uses. Surrounding land uses include a City-owned parking structure (CarPark 1) and community center to the north, the Boys & Girls Club to the east, single-family residential land uses across Broadway to the south, and a vacant three story office building (Willdan Building) to the west. In 1980, Planning Commission approved CUP No. 2144 to permit a performing arts theater with 2,500 “theater in the round” seats. In 2003, Commission approved an amendment to the CUP to allow church services as an accessory use to the existing performing arts theater. The amendment permits up to two church services on Sundays and use of the theater for other church activities during the remainder of the week, for up to a total maximum of 120 days of use per calendar year. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 October 15, 2018 Page 2 of 7 The City provided 650 parking spaces for the performing arts theater and accessory church services and activities, in CarPark 1 under the terms and conditions of a recorded parking lease with the City. The CUP requires the church and performance theater to operate under a valid parking lease with the City for CarPark 1. The parking lease expired on May 31, 2015. The River Church purchased the property and established the operation of a primary church use on October 13, 2015. Since the CUP only permits a church as an accessory use to the performing arts theater and the parking lease has expired, the church has been operating out of compliance with the CUP. This CUP application was considered by the Planning Commission on January 22, 2018 and was continued to a date uncertain at the request of the applicant to allow for additional time to finalize the project description and parking license agreement with the City. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to permit and retain a church as the primary use of the existing 2,500-seat performing arts theater, with the following allocation of building areas:  Main Assembly: 23,460 square feet  Restaurant: 3,287 square feet  Bookstore: 437 square feet  Playground Room: 1,783 square feet  TV Studio: 2,325 square feet  Office: 116 square feet  Classrooms: 3,918 square feet The church is presently offering two services on Sunday and is requesting approval to continue these services. Services would continue to start at 9:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. with Sunday School in the classrooms and indoor playground room available during the services. The applicant also requests approval to add a third service at 4:00 p.m. on Sundays in the future. The applicant also requests the following accessory uses (peak parking demand indicated in the parking study for each use is also provided for reference):  Administrative activities Monday through Saturday for up to 10 staff members (10 parking spaces).  Use of the classrooms or lobby for group meetings with up to 150 people, such as evening devotionals, intercessory prayer meetings, Bible seminars, or civic group meetings from 7:00 p.m. 11:00 p.m., Monday through Friday; and from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Saturdays (100 parking spaces).  Emergency prayer and counseling offered daily, 24 hours a day, for up to 20 people (10 parking spaces).  A bookstore would operate from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., on Sundays (No additional parking spaces). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 October 15, 2018 Page 3 of 7  The River Café (Café) would be open from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily, with seating for up to 115 people. The Café would serve breakfast, lunch, and dinner and would sell beer and wine for on-site consumption (33 parking spaces).  Friday evening events such as group meetings, bible study, drama classes, choir practice, etc., for up to 300 people from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. (200 parking spaces).  Use of the Multi-Purpose room as a sound-stage for a television talk show Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. for up to 10 people (6 parking spaces).  Use of the Arena as a performing arts and conference center, as well as for other various events, up to two times per month. A seven day prayer chain would also occur once a year from 6:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. each day during the event.(753 parking spaces, plus any additional determined to be necessary for events that occur outside the arena).  Site Plan FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 October 15, 2018 Page 4 of 7 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Zoning Code classifies churches as a Community and Religious Assembly use, and permits said uses in the General Commercial Zone, subject to approval of a conditional use permit to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area. Staff’s main focus for the proposed use is regarding the off-site parking, as described and analyzed below. In addition, approval of the sale of beer and wine for on-site consumption at the River Café also requires approval of a conditional use permit. The analysis of the proposed beer and wine sales follows the parking analysis. Staff has determined that no other accessory uses require additional analysis. The proposed TV broadcasting studio is permitted by right without a live audience. The classrooms and playground are accessory to the church; no school use is proposed at this time. Parking: The Zoning Code requires a parking demand study to determine the appropriate number of parking spaces for Community and Religious Assembly uses. The City hired LSA Associates to prepare a parking demand study. The study analyzed parking under the assumption that the City would provide parking for the church in several City-owned parking structures through a parking license agreement. The church has been operating for the past two years without a license agreement and has been using volunteer staff to direct church patrons to park in the City-owned structures. The City has negotiated the terms of a license agreement with the church. This agreement is pending City Council approval and is attached for the Planning Commission’s information. Terms are not within the purview of the Planning Commission. The license agreement would provide for an initial term of ten years, with options for two extensions of five years each. Parking for Sunday services would be provided by 450 spaces in CarPark 1, and the balance (303 spaces) in CarPark 2. Any overflow parking would be provided in CarPark 3. Disabled persons or oversized vehicles will be able to park in the Willdan lot (see map below). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 October 15, 2018 Page 5 of 7 PARKING LOCATION MAP The parking demand study concluded that the peak parking demand would occur on Sunday during regular church services and that the proposed church would require 753 parking spaces. The study determined that the City’s parking structures have sufficient capacity to accommodate the church parking demand, but recommended that there be a minimum of 90 minutes between the end of one service and start of the next service to avoid a parking deficiency due to the overlap of demand created by services being too close together. The church currently has two service times at 9:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m.; however the church proposes to add a third service at 4:00 p.m. Each church service lasts two hours each. Additional recommendations provided by the parking demand study included requiring trained traffic control staff on Sundays and requiring approval of a permitting process for use of the arena for large events outside of normal operations. With the recommendations indicated in the parking study, staff believes the church and other accessory uses can operate without impacts to the surrounding area. Staff has included these recommendations in the draft conditions of approval. Further, staff recommends a condition requiring that the applicant execute a parking license agreement with the City to utilize 753 parking spaces during peak parking demand hours on Sundays, as well as any parking needed CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 October 15, 2018 Page 6 of 7 for the proposed accessory uses, as described in the parking study. Should the applicant fail to execute a license agreement within 90 days, the CUP would be null and void. Staff recommends an administrative review for the twice-a-month events and the seven day Prayer Chain. Staff recommends that an application for Substantial Conformance be submitted for staff review, and that any event occurring outside the building would require a Special Event Permit. Sale of Alcoholic Beverages for On-Site Consumption: The Zoning Code permits sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages in the General Commercial Zone, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in order to determine compatibility with surrounding land uses. The subject site is located in Census Tract Number 873.00, which has a population of 10,413. Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) permits 11 on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses in proportion to the size of the population in the tract. There are presently 20 licenses in the tract and additional licenses may be allowed subject to ABC approval. Typically on-sale licenses associated with a restaurant are allowed by ABC even though the total number of licenses exceeds the number permitted in the census tract. ABC also allows for six off-sale licenses and there are presently five licenses in the tract. The subject site is within Reporting District 1625, which is 262% above the city average in crime. There have been five calls for service to this location in the last year. The calls for service consisted of: one burglary alarm, one vandalism, one medical aide, one public event, and one suspicious circumstances. The ¼ mile radius surrounding this location is 302% above the city average in crime. The calls for service primarily consisted of: 121 petty thefts, 40 vandalisms, 24 drug violations, 24 simple assaults, and 21 vehicle thefts. The attached draft resolution contains recommended conditions of approval to mitigate potential impacts to surrounding residential properties. Some of these conditions include:  Alcohol service shall be limited to the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. daily  No exterior advertising of alcoholic beverages  The alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premise (bar) type license  The restaurant premise shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant  Managers/Owners/Employees shall obtain LEAD training  Restaurant doors shall be kept closed at all times  Off-premise consumption shall be prohibited Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). This class consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of the use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and would not cause a significant effect on the environment. The existing performing arts theater/church meets these criteria. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 October 15, 2018 Page 7 of 7 to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions recommended, staff believes that the existing church would be compatible with the surrounding land uses. The number of parking spaces provided through the parking license agreement for off-site parking would be adequate to serve the church and accessory uses. Conditions of approval have been included in the draft resolution to ensure that the church would operate in a compatible manner with the surrounding civic and residential uses. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of this request, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor David See Associate Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Letter of Request, October 2018 3. LSA Parking Analysis 4. Floor Plan 5. Photos 6. Draft Copy of the Parking License Agreement C -G D E V 2 0 1 5 -0 0 1 2 1 R I V E R C H U R C H C-GRETAIL RM-4FOURPLEX RM-3FOURPLEXC-G (DMU)CITY HALL R M -4 P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E C -G C I T Y H A L L O -L C I T Y H A L L O -L O F F I C E S I (S A B C ) F A R M E R S P A R K I (S A B C ) R E S T A U R A N T / B R E W E R Y C -G (M U ) M O R T U A R Y C -G (S A B C ) P A R K I N G L O T R M -4 (S A B C ) A P A R T M E N T S 1 6 D U R M -4 (S A B C ) A P A R T M E N T S 1 6 D U C -G (S A B C ) S F R C -G S E R V I C E S T A T I O N I (M U ) A P A R T M E N T S I R E S T A U R A N T S C-G (DMU)MUSEUM R M -4 B O Y S A N D G I R L S C L U B R M -4 (S A B C ) 7 D U R M -4 (S A B C ) A P T S R M -4 (S A B C ) A P T S 1 9 D U R M -4 (S A B C ) A P T S9 D U R M -4 (S A B C ) A P T S 1 2 D U R M -4 (S A B C ) A P T S 1 2 D U R S -2 O F F I C E S R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 O F F I C E S R M -4APT S 1 4 D U R M -4SFR R M -4 F O U R P L E X R M -4APT S6 D U R M -3 C O N D O S R M -3 C O N D O S R M -3APT S4 D U R M -3 N U R S I N G H O M E R M -3 A P T S -1 2 D U S P 9 0 -2 -P C L 4 1 4 S C O N D O M I N I U M S / T O W N H O U S E S R M -3 T R I P L E X C -G D O W N T O W N C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R C -G P A R K I N G L O T C -GRETA I L C -G P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R EC-G K R A E M E R B U I L D I N G A P T S R M -4 P A R K I N G L O T R M -4PAR K R M -4 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R M -4PAR K R M -4PAR K RM-3DUPLEX I I N D U S T R I A L R M -4 D U P L E X R M -4APT S7 D U R M -4 D U P L E X R M -4 F O U R P L E X R M -4 D U P L E X R M -4SFR R M -4 D U P L E X R M -4 A P T S 1 2 D U E B R O A D W A Y S A N A H E I M B L V D S A N A H E I M B L V D S O L I V E S T E C E N T E R S T S P H I L A D E L P H I A S T S C L A U D I N A S T W E L M S T S M I T O W A Y S . E A S T S T E . L I N C O L N A V E N . E A S T S T W . B R O A D W A Y E . B R O A D W A Y N . H A R B O R B L V D N . A N A H E I M B L V D S.M A N C H E S T E R A V E S . A N A H E I M B L V D W .LI N C O L N A V E 2 0 1 East Broadway D E V N o. 2015-00121 Subject Property APN: 037-014-29 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Photo:May 2016 E B R O A D W A Y S A N A H E I M B L V D S A N A H E I M B L V D S O L I V E S T E C E N T E R S T S P H I L A D E L P H I A S T S C L A U D I N A S T W E L M S T S M I T O W A Y S . E A S T S T E . L I N C O L N A V E N . E A S T S T W . B R O A D W A Y E . B R O A D W A Y N . H A R B O R B L V D N . A N A H E I M B L V D S.M A N C H E S T E R A V E S . A N A H E I M B L V D W .LI N C O L N A V E 2 0 1 East Broadway D E V N o. 2015-00121 Subject Property APN: 037-014-29 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Photo:May 2016 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2018-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2018-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2015-00121) (201 EAST BROADWAY) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05840 to permit and retain an existing church, performing arts theater, restaurant with sales of beer and wine for on-site consumption, accessory retail store, and off-site parking (the "Proposed Project") for premises located at that certain real property at 201 East Broadway, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.33-acres in size and is currently developed with a 43,873 square foot performing arts theater and church building. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General Commercial land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was scheduled before the Planning Commission at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 29, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith. The Planning Commission continued the item to the January 22, 2018 meeting, and subsequently continued the item to a date uncertain. A duly noticed public hearing was scheduled before the Planning Commission on October 15, 2018; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2018-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05840, does find and determine the following: 1. The proposed request to permit and retain an existing church in a performing arts theater building is an allowable use within the "C-G" General Commercial Zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone. 2. The conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area because the Property is developed with performing arts theater building and there are a sufficient amount of off-site parking spaces to accommodate the parking demand for the church through a parking license agreement with the City. 3. The size and shape of the Property is adequate to allow the full operation of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health, safety and general welfare because the facility is located within a performing arts theater building and a sufficient number of off-site parking spaces and adequate vehicle circulation are provided. 4. The traffic generated by the use would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets to accommodate the use and traffic control measures will be implemented to ensure that traffic impacts do not occur in and around the project site. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05840 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. - 3 - PC2018-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05840, and further contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05840 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2018. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2018-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on October 15, 2018 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of October, 2018. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2018-*** - 6 - PC2018-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05840 (DEV2015-00121) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 A minimum of 90 minutes shall be provided between the end of one church service and the start of another. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 2 Group meetings of up to 150 participants may be held from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and Satuday, 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. except during Planning Commission or City Council meetings. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 3 Group meetings of up to 300 participants may be held on Friday evenings from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 4 Up to two large events per month, that occur wholly within the building, may be authorized by City staff for up to 2,500 people and an anuual week-long event consisting of church services offered from 7:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. These large events are subject to the availability of parking as determined by the Community and Economic Development Director, and subject to Planning Director determination of substantial conformance upon verification that there are no conflicting events scheduled within the vicinity. The applicant shall provide an Administrative Substantial Conformance application and applicable fee for said event not less than 30 days prior to the event. Any event that includes activities outside the building shall be subject to approval of a Special Event Permit, and limited to no more than four events per calendar year. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 5 The applicant shall provide parking management services from a licensed parking operator during ingress and egress of church services. Qualifications of parking operators shall be at the discretion of the Public Works Department and/or the Police Department. Any traffic control shall be provided by the Anaheim Police Department. All parking management services and traffic control shall be provided at the expense of the applicant. Public Works and Police Departments 6 The applicant shall execute a parking license agreement with City allowing it to utilize parking spaces within City-owned structures within 90 days of the date of this approval or Conditional Use Permit No. 2015- 05840 shall be null and void. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 7 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 7 Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05840 shall be null and void if the Parking License Agreement is ever terminated, unless the applicant demonstrates adequate parking is provided in accordance with the Parking Study prepared by LSA Associates, dated June 2018, at alternative locations and the subject Conditional Use Permit is amended and approved by the Planning Commission. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 8 The facility shall operate in accordance with the applicant’s Letter of Operation and Parking Study prepared by LSA Associates, dated June 2018, submitted as part of the application. Any changes to the facility’s operation described in the Letter of Operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Building Director to determine substantial conformance with said letter and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. The use shall cease if the parking license agreement is terminated or expires. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 9 Traffic and parking generated by the church shall be compatible with surrounding uses. The applicant shall make every reasonable effort to prevent patrons from parking in adjacent residential neighborhoods. In the event of any incompatiblities, the applicant shall work with staff to resolve the issues. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 10 A letter requesting termination of Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2144 and 2003-04762 shall be submitted to the Planning Department. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 11 Sales, service, and consumption of beer and wine shall be permitted only between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. each day of the week. Police Department 12 There shall be no exterior advertising of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Police Department 13 That subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premise (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the Business and Professions Code. Police Department 14 At all times when the restaurant is open for business, it shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant. Police Department 15 Parking lots, driveways, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings, shall be provided with enough lighting to illuminate and make clearly visible the presence of any person Police Department - 8 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles onsite. 16 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department to prevent disturbances to the nearby neighborhood. Police Department 17 The business shall not employ or permit any persons to solicit or encourage others, directly or indirectly, to buy them drinks in the licensed premises under any commission, percentage, salary, or other profit-sharing plan, scheme or conspiracy. (Section 24200.5 Alcoholic Beverage Control Act) Police Department 18 Managers / Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training for themselves and service employees. The number is 714-558-4101. Police Department 19 The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted. Police Department 20 The number of persons shall not exceed the maximum occupancy load as determined by the Anaheim Fire Department. Signs indicating the occupant load shall be posted in a conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the room. (Section 25.114(a) Uniform Fire Code) Police Department 21 The door(s) shall be kept closed at all times during the operation of the business except in cases of emergency. Said door(s) not to consist solely of a screen or ventilated security door. Police Department 22 The Petitioner(s) shall post and maintain a professional quality sign facing the premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows: NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST The sign shall be at least two feet square with two inch block lettering. The sign shall be in English and Spanish. Police Department 23 The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises shall be prohibited. Police Department 24 Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons about the premises. Police Department - 9 - PC2018-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 25 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the property owner shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning and Building Department, Code Enforcement Division Amd Police Department 26 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 27 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 28 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 29 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division ATTACHMENT NO. 2 June 2018 PARKING ANALYSIS RIVER ARENA 201 EAST BROADWAY CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2015-00121 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 June 2018 PARKING ANALYSIS RIVER ARENA 201 EAST BROADWAY CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2015-00121 Submitted to: City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, California 92805 Prepared by: LSA 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 553-0666 Project No. AHM1504 P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Statement of Purpose .................................................................................................................................... 1 Background .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ........................................................................................................................................ 4 PARKING REQUIRED BY CODE ................................................................................................................ 5 PARKING PROVIDED BY PREVIOUS LEASE AGREEMENT ......................................................................... 5 EXISTING PARKING SUPPLY .................................................................................................................... 6 EXISTING SUNDAY PARKING OPERATION ............................................................................................... 7 Single Church Service ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Two Church Services ...................................................................................................................................... 9 RECOMMENDED PARKING OPERATION ............................................................................................... 10 EXISTING PARKING DEMAND ............................................................................................................... 12 FUTURE PARKING DEMAND ................................................................................................................. 14 FUTURE PARKING DEMAND: INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF CHURCH SERVICES ................................ 16 FUTURE PARKING DEMAND: WEEKDAYS AND SATURDAY ................................................................... 17 PARKING SUPPLIED TO CHURCH .......................................................................................................... 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................. 19 Additional Sunday Services .......................................................................................................................... 19 Administrative Parking Spaces ..................................................................................................................... 20 Group Meetings and Activities ..................................................................................................................... 20 Saturday Church Activities and Group Meetings ......................................................................................... 21 Emergency Prayer and Counseling .............................................................................................................. 21 Bookstore ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 River Café ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 Sound Stage/Multipurpose Room ............................................................................................................... 22 Occasional Leasing as Conference/Performing Arts Center ........................................................................ 22 CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................... 23 APPENDIX A: Parking Accumulation Data P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» ii FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location ....................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2: Existing Sunday Parking Operation.......................................................................................... 8 Figure 3: Recommended Sunday Parking Operation ........................................................................... 11 TABLES Table A: Municipal Code Parking Requirements .................................................................................... 6 Table B: Sunday Maximum Observed Parking Demand ....................................................................... 13 Table C: Church Parking Demand ......................................................................................................... 14 Table D: Projected New Sunday Parking Demand ................................................................................ 15 Table E: Projected Sunday Parking Demand with the 11:00 AM–1:00 PM Church Service ................ 16 Table F: Projected Sunday Parking Demand with Recommended 9:00 AM, 12:30 PM, and 4:00 PM Church Services ....................................................................................................... 17 Table G: Projected Saturday Parking Demand ..................................................................................... 17 Table H: Weekday Parking Commitments ............................................................................................ 18 P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 1 INTRODUCTION Statement of Purpose The River Church (Church) is currently operating at the River Arena (Arena) at 201 East Broadway in the downtown portion of Anaheim (City), in an area marketed as “Center City.” The Church has filed a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application to allow the Church to operate as the primary tenant of the Arena. The purpose of this analysis is to determine the parking demand associated with the operation of the Church and whether sufficient nearby parking supply is available now and in the future to support the use. Utilizing field observation and empirical data, LSA evaluated the existing Church operation. From this information, LSA projected parking demand associated with the future operation of the Church, as it is described in the CUP application. This analysis compares existing and future parking supply and demand. The analysis also considers ongoing and future development plans for the greater Center City area. Topics addressed in this analysis include: • Estimates of the parking demand generated by a typical Church service, • Availability of existing off-street parking to accommodate Church parking demand, • Availability of future off-street parking to accommodate Church parking demand, and • Church parking operations. Background The River Arena was originally approved by CUP No. 2144 in 1980 as a performing arts theater. After approving several extensions, in 1985 the Planning Commission approved an amendment to the CUP to revise the previously-approved plans. The 48,873-square foot-theater was constructed in 1986 and named the Freedman Forum. The 2,500-seat theater is designed as a “theater in the round” with a stage that can rotate 360 degrees in a circular motion in either direction during show time activities. The theater includes dressing rooms, storage, utility rooms, rehearsal rooms, restrooms and a restaurant. The theater was approved with a waiver of the minimum number of parking spaces and constructed with no on-site parking supply. The theater has been reliant upon off-site parking provided in adjacent City-owned parking facilities under various executed parking agreements between the building owner/operator and the City. In 2003, CUP No. 2144 was amended to allow a church use in conjunction with the existing performing arts theater. Approval of the amendment included the following two conditions, as well as a number of other conditions of approval, which are included in Resolution No. PC2003-136: 1. That all church activities shall continue to be in compliance with the terms and conditions of the parking lease between the City and Moving On Entertainment dated December 31, 1986, as it may be amended from time to time, pertaining to the use of the City-owned structure. 2. That the church shall be accessory to the live performance theater as approved under CUP No. 2144. Said church use shall be limited to one hundred twenty (120) calendar days per year and the hours of operation shall be consistent with the above-referenced parking lease. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 2 Current River Church use of the facility is not in compliance with CUP No. 2144 because the church use is now the primary use of the facility. River Church has also been operating without a valid lease agreement for various City-owned parking facilities, although the Church and the City have been negotiating lease terms. Figure 1 (Project Location) illustrates the project location in relation to the off-site parking serving Center City near the Arena. All of the parking lots highlighted on Figure 1 are owned and managed by the City. All of the Center City parking structures (including Car Park 4 on Center Street Promenade and Car Parks 5, 6, and 7 on Broadway, not shown on figure) are conditioned to be available to all members of the public after 5:00 p.m. on weekdays and all day on weekends. It should be noted that non-resident areas of Car Parks 5 and 6 limit parking to 2 hours. However, this analysis focuses on the parking lots identified in Figure 1 and described below. Car Park 1 is immediately opposite 42nd Street from the Arena. Car Park 2 is located on the north side of Center Street, approximately 800 feet from the Arena. Marked crosswalks provide a path from Car Park 2 to the south side of Center Street. From there, the most direct walking path to the Arena is along a service road west of Car Park 1. Under the current setting, Car Park 1 and Car Park 2 are considered the primary parking supply for the Church. In addition, the Church uses the surface parking lot of the adjacent “Willdan Building,” located at the northeast corner of Broadway and Anaheim Boulevard, for handicap parking. Church users are instructed not to use the surface parking lot adjacent to the Downtown Anaheim Community Center (referred to in this report as the “Community Center lot”). In June 2015, the City commissioned a review of Center City parking, including a pool of 1,797 parking spaces in surface parking lots and in structured parking. This report utilizes some of the data collected and analyzed in the previous report, but builds on the previous effort with additional emphasis on Sunday parking conditions. This report also focuses on large parking facilities that can efficiently facilitate the surge in parking demand associated with an event such as a church service. The facilities analyzed are within walking distance of River Church. The future supply of parking for the Church may change as a result of City plans for Center City, which include development of the Willdan Building lot and the Community Center lot. When those lots are developed, parking currently accommodated in the lots will need to shift to other City- owned or operated parking facilities. To accommodate this future condition, this report considers the parking resources of Car Park 3, which is located west of Anaheim Boulevard, on Center Street Promenade, approximately 900 feet from the Arena. A marked crosswalk at a traffic signal- controlled intersection connects Car Park 3 with the east side of Anaheim Boulevard. From there, a clear walking path is provided through the City Hall campus. As described later in this report, Church parking could be accommodated within Car Park 1, Car Park 2, and Car Park 3 as opposed to the current use of Car Park 1, Car Park 2, and the Willdan Building lot. FIGURE1 I: \ A H M 1 5 0 4 \ G \ P r o j e c t L o c a t i o n . c d r ( 8 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 ) Project LocationRiver Arena SO U R C E : G o o g l e E a r t h FE E T 20 0 10 0 0N ANAHEIM B L V D ANAHEIM B L V D OLIVE S T OLIVE S T C E N T E R S T C E N T E R S T BROADWAY BROADWAY PHILADE L P H I A S T PHILADE L P H I A S T CLAUDIN A S T CLAUDIN A S T L I N C O L N A V E L I N C O L N A V E 4 2 N D S T 4 2 N D S T LE G E N D - E n t r a n c e t o P a r k i n g L o t Ca r P a r k 2 Ca r P a r k 2 Ca r P ar k 1 Ca r Pa r k 1 Wi l l d a n Lo t Wi l l d a n Lo t Ca r P a r k 3 Ca r P a r k 3 Co m m u n i t y Ce n te r L o t Co m m u n i t y Ce n t e r L o t Pr o j e c t Si t e Pr o j e c t Si t e P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 4 Project Description The Church is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a church as the primary use, with the performing arts venue as an accessory use with no on-site parking and all parking to be provided off-site. This conditional use permit (CUP2015-05840) would supersede and replace CUP NO. 2144. The Church’s request has been modified to be consistent with the findings of this Parking Analysis. Details of the request include: • Up to three services in the Arena between 7:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. on Sunday with proposed start times of 9:00 a.m., 12:30 p.m., and 4:00 p.m.; • Use of the classrooms, lobby, or Arena for evening devotionals, intercessory prayer meetings, Bible seminars, or civic group meetings of up to 150 people from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through Friday (except during Planning Commission or City Council meetings); • Use of the classrooms, lobby, or Arena for church activities or group meetings of up to 150 people from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., on Saturday; • Emergency prayer and counseling of church members and local citizens 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; • A bookstore, which would operate concurrently with other events in the Arena; • The River Café (Café); which would be open from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday through Sunday and serve breakfast, lunch, and dinner with seating for up to 115 people; • Use of the multipurpose room as a sound stage and set for a television talk show anticipated to be taped two or three times a month during daytime hours (8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.); • Occasional use of the Arena as a conference center for up to 500 attendees from 7:00 p.m. to midnight Wednesday evenings and up to 300 attendees from 6:00 p.m. to midnight Friday evenings; and, • Occasional leasing of the Arena as a performing arts and conference center by Special Event permit if the number of attendees exceeds the use described above. The Church’s pending CUP application states that the following parking will be needed to accommodate the Church: • 753 parking spaces for Church services from 7:00 a.m. to 12 a.m., on Sundays; • 10 parking spaces for employees and administrative functions from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday; • 100 parking spaces for civic group meetings from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday; P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 5 • 10 parking spaces for church members or the general public daily; • 33 parking spaces Monday through Saturday and 50 parking spaces on Sunday for the Café from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; • 333 parking spaces for use of the Arena or classrooms from 7:00 p.m. to 12 a.m., Wednesday evening; • 200 parking spaces for use of the Arena or classrooms from 6:00 p.m. to 12 a.m., Friday evening; and • 6 parking spaces for a multipurpose room on Friday between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. PARKING REQUIRED BY CODE Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) Section 18.42.040 establishes off-street parking requirements for various land uses. Recent revisions to the AMC state that community and religious assembly require a parking demand study and default parking rates are not provided. At the time the application was filed, however, the AMC required community and religious assembly uses to provide 0.333 parking space per fixed seat or 29 spaces per 1,000 square feet (sf) of gross floor area, whichever is higher. Additional parking spaces were required for office uses (4 spaces per 1,000) or if a kitchen facility is provided (0.02 space per person for the maximum capacity figure of the assembly area determined by the City Fire Department). This parking analysis states the estimated parking demand for the project based on the AMC rates at the time the application was filed, and also presents the parking demand study specified in the current AMC. When operating independent of the Arena, the River Café could generate parking demand as a general restaurant with more than 20 seats. Other ancillary uses, such as the bookstore and classrooms used as community meeting space, would require additional parking demand according to the municipal code. Table A displays the AMC parking requirement for each element of the project and potential parking requirement for simultaneous use of all project elements. As Table A shows, the AMC parking requirement for the Arena is 1,005 parking spaces. PARKING PROVIDED BY PREVIOUS LEASE AGREEMENT The 2003 amendment to the original CUP associated with the performing arts center permitted the operation of a church at the Arena with a lease agreement for 450 parking spaces in Car Park 1 and 150 parking spaces in Car Park 2, for a total of 600 off-site parking spaces during Sunday services. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 6 Table A: Municipal Code Parking Requirements Land Use Parking Space Rates Per Anaheim Municipal Code §18.42.040 Project Parking Requirements Size Unit Required Parking Spaces Arena 0.333 spaces per fixed seat or 29 spaces per 1,000 sf of gross floor area, whichever is greater 2,500 Seats 833 River Café 0.02 spaces per person for the maximum capacity of the assembly area 2,500 Seats 50 Independent of Arena 10 spaces per TSF 3.287 TSF 33 Recording Studio 2.5 spaces per TSF 2.325 TSF 6 Bookstore 4 spaces per TSF 0.437 TSF 2 Office 4 spaces per TSF 0.116 TSF 0 Meeting Space (Classrooms) 0.333 spaces per fixed seat or 29 spaces per 1,000 sf of gross floor area, whichever is greater 3.918 TSF 114 TOTAL 1,005 sf = square feet TSF = thousand square feet EXISTING PARKING SUPPLY Car Park 1 has a total of 406 spaces that are available to the general public. Car Park 1 has two entrances from 42nd Street. The west entrance provides access to 57 parking spaces of which 26 spaces are reserved for City employees, 10 spaces are reserved for vehicles displaying handicap parking placards, 4 spaces are reserved for electric vehicles, 1 space is reserved for 20-minute parking, and 16 spaces are open to visitors. The east entrance provides access to 462 parking spaces on four levels, of which 87 are reserved for City employees, carpools, and other reserved uses. Of the 519 total spaces in Car Park 1, 406 parking spaces are available to the general public and 113 spaces are reserved for employees (15 general public spaces and 5 employee spaces are reserved for handicapped, electric vehicle and 20-minute parking). It is speculated that otherwise reserved parking spaces may have been made available to the previous church to achieve the 450 spaces that were leased in connection with CUP No. 2144. Car Park 2 has a total of 476 spaces available to the general public. Car Park 2 has an entrance off Center Street. This parking structure has a total of 613 parking spaces. Of the 87 parking spaces on the ground floor, 21 spaces are marked “reserved,” 13 are designated for vehicles displaying handicap parking placards, 8 are reserved for vanpools, and 1 is a motorcycle parking space. The second floor holds 99 parking spaces. The third, fourth, and fifth floors hold 111 parking spaces each, and the sixth floor holds 94 parking spaces. While the sixth floor has no markings indicating the public should not park there, it is almost entirely occupied by vehicles leasing storage space from the City; therefore, these spaces on the sixth floor are not included in the 476 parking spaces available to the general public. Car Park 3 has a total of 422 parking spaces available to the general public (not including gated parking areas, permit parking, or motorcycle spaces). Car Park 3 has entrances from Center Street Promenade and Oak Street. At this time, free parking is provided on weekends on the upper levels of this lot. Of the 56 parking spaces on Level 1, 12 are for retail parking only, 6 are designated for P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 7 vehicles displaying handicap parking placards, and 5 are reserved for electric vehicles. Level 2 has 92 vehicle parking spaces and 11 motorcycle parking spaces. Of the 92 vehicle parking spaces, 44 are restricted to permit or carpool parking, 3 are designated for vehicles displaying handicap parking placards, and 8 are large enough for oversized vehicles. Level 3 has 98 regular parking spaces, 5 electric vehicle spaces, 4 handicap placard spaces, and 2 oversized vehicle spaces. Level 4 has 102 regular spaces, 4 handicap placard spaces, and 3 oversized vehicle spaces. Level 5 has 107 regular spaces and 8 oversized vehicle spaces. The Community Center lot provides 101 parking spaces available to the general public for parking for the Downtown Anaheim Community Center and Senior Center. This lot is accessed from Center Street and provides a total of 131 parking spaces. Of these, 12 are reserved for vehicles displaying handicap parking placards and 18 are reserved for City vehicles. The Willdan Building lot las 43 total parking spaces, of which 6 are reserved for vehicles displaying handicap parking placards; however, during services at the River Church, access to this lot is controlled and all of the parking spaces are limited to vehicles displaying handicap parking placards. EXISTING SUNDAY PARKING OPERATION In December 2015, LSA visited the site during arrivals and departures to and from Sunday services to observe parking operation, impacts to the street system, use of handicap parking, and time required for ingress and egress. LSA’s observations also helped differentiate Church parking demand from other uses (e.g., Packing House). In March 2016 the Church began offering two Sunday services and LSA visited the site in March 2016 and October 2016 to observe the turnover of parking spaces. Observations made when a single service was offered indicated the potential peak parking demand that a Church service could have as the Church’s congregation continues to grow and are presented in the parking demand section following. Single Church Service When parking data was collected in December 2015, the Church held one church service from 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on Sunday. Doors to the Arena opened around 10:15 a.m., but congregants began arriving as early as 9:00 a.m. The Church utilized its collection of volunteers known as the “Traffic Team” to help direct vehicles to Car Park 1. Members of the Traffic Team also directed vehicles away from the surface parking lot west of the Arena (i.e., the Willdan Building lot) unless the vehicle displayed a handicap placard. Some members of the Traffic Team were in place by 9:15 a.m., with all locations staffed by 10:15 a.m. Figure 2 illustrates the location of Traffic Team volunteers and identifies the first locations staffed and subsequent locations staffed. From 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., the Traffic Team had volunteers on Broadway and on 42nd Street. Vehicles arriving from the west were directed from Broadway to 42nd Street along Claudina Street. Vehicles arriving from the east were directed from Broadway to 42nd Street along Philadelphia Street. The volunteer on 42nd Street directed vehicles away from the west entrance to Car Park 1 when the parking accessible from that entrance was full. This person also coordinated the flow of westbound and eastbound traffic into the parking structure to reduce conflict between the two streams of traffic and increase the efficiency of the operation. When traffic along Claudina Street began backing up to Broadway, this stream of traffic was given preference to enter Car Park 1 to FIGURE2 I: \ A H M 1 5 0 4 \ G \ E x i s t i n g S u n d a y P a r k i n g . c d r ( 8 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 ) Ex i s t i n g S u n d a y P a r k i n g O p e r a t i o n River Arena SO U R C E : G o o g l e E a r t h FE E T 20 0 10 0 0N ANAHEIM B L V D ANAHEIM B L V D OLIVE S T OLIVE S T C E N T E R S T C E N T E R S T BROADWAY BROADWAY PHILADE L P H I A S T PHILADE L P H I A S T CLAUDIN A S T CLAUDIN A S T L I N C O L N A V E L I N C O L N A V E 4 2 N D S T 4 2 N D S T Pr o j e c t Si t e Pr o j e c t Si t e Ca r P a r k 2 Ca r P a r k 2 Ca r Pa r k 1 Ca r Pa r k 1 Wi l l d a n Lo t Wi l l d a n Lo t Ca r P a r k 3 Ca r P a r k 3 Co m m u n i t y Ce n t e r L o t Co m m u n i t y Ce n t e r L o t LE G E N D - E n t r a n c e t o P a r k i n g L o t - F i r s t V o l u n t e e r L o c a t i o n s ( 9 : 0 0 a . m . ) - S e c o n d V o l u n t e e r L o c a t i o n s ( 1 0 : 0 0 a . m . ) P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 9 prevent interference with through traffic on Broadway. For the majority of the 9:00 a.m. hour, arrivals were intermittent and no queue formed at the entrance of Car Park 1. From 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., the Traffic Team had additional volunteers at the corners of Anaheim Boulevard/Broadway and Olive Street/Center Street, and across from the Car Park 2 entrance. Volunteers were also stationed on the roof of Car Park 1 to signal when the structure was full. Traffic into the Church was steady at this time and a queue was constantly present at the entrance to Car Park 1. The queue did not appear to interfere with traffic on Broadway. Starting around 10:00 a.m., some vehicles began to park in Car Park 2 on their own, although the Traffic Team did not actively begin directing vehicles into Car Park 2 until 10:15 a.m. At 10:25 a.m., the volunteer at Claudina Street/Broadway was still directing vehicles to 42nd Street. However, by 10:30 a.m., Car Park 1 was full and vehicles were discouraged from entering. Both eastbound and westbound streams of traffic were directed to continue straight until they reached Broadway, then directed along either Anaheim Boulevard or Olive Street to Center Street and Car Park 2. When Car Park 1 was full, the volunteer at the corner of Anaheim Boulevard/Broadway switched his sign to direct vehicles to turn left (northbound) on Anaheim Boulevard to Center Street. The Church service began at 11:00 a.m. Vehicles associated with the service were fully parked by 11:30 a.m. Although the volume of inbound vehicles is high, efforts by the Traffic Team to manage the operation seemed to work, resulting in less driver confusion and a more orderly flow of traffic. About 5 minutes before the end of services at 1:00 p.m., the first people to leave the Church service emerged from the Arena and began walking to the parking lots. Heavy flows of people out of the Arena lasted for about 0.5 hour after the end of the service, although some people chose to visit in front of the Arena entrance for more than an hour after the end of services. The Traffic Team placed volunteers on 42nd Street to direct vehicles out of Car Park 1. The volunteers stopped traffic exiting from the eastern driveway to allow vehicles to exit from the western driveway and directed all vehicles exiting the western driveway to Philadelphia Street. A steady stream of cars was observed exiting Car Park 1 for 50 minutes after the end of services. After that time, vehicles left Car Park 1 sporadically. Two Church Services Beginning in March 2016, the Church has held two services, one at 9:00 a.m. and the other at 12:00 p.m. While the first service is ongoing, the Traffic Team attempts to direct early arrivals to Car Park 2 using signage at Anaheim Boulevard/Broadway, signage and personnel at the entrance to Car Park 1, and signage, personnel, and traffic cones at Philadelphia Street/Broadway. Heavy flows of people were observed to exit the Arena shortly after 11:00 a.m. As people exited, Traffic Team members on Broadway and on Center Street reminded vehicles to stop for pedestrians in the crosswalks. Vehicles were discouraged from approaching Car Park 1 until approximately 11:15 a.m. People exited the Arena and doors were closed to people arriving for the second service until 11:30 a.m. While waiting for doors to open, pedestrians lined up along sidewalks on both Broadway and 42nd Street. By 11:40 a.m., neither Car Park 1 nor Car Park 2 had a standing queue of vehicles waiting to exit the structure, although vehicles continued to exit. The heaviest inbound flow for the second service occurred around 11:50 a.m. At this time, vehicle flows were heavy into both Car Park 1 and Car P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 10 Park 2. Car Park 1 was full and closed to inbound traffic by 12:00 p.m. Latecomers continued to enter Car Park 2 for some time. RECOMMENDED PARKING OPERATION The efforts of the Church’s Traffic Team reduce driver confusion, which in turn reduces unpredictable driver behavior on City streets and reduces the potential for collisions. Additionally, without the Church asserting control over and organizing the parking operation, queues would likely affect traffic on Broadway. Regardless of the intentions of the actions, however, LSA cannot recommend that a private individual stand within the public right-of-way to direct traffic, nor can a private organization place traffic control devices within public right-of-way. If the orderly flow of traffic requires temporary closure of public roads and/or traffic control at uncontrolled intersections, then Anaheim Police Department Traffic Control officers or City-trained civilian contractors should perform those duties. The City has procedures for events requiring temporary traffic control and could manage ingress and egress for Church services. Having the City manage traffic control would have the added benefit of being coordinated with the parking needs of other Center City uses. During special events (such as the Tinkerbell Half Marathon), and as the parking supply and demand shifts from existing to future conditions, City management of traffic control would be able to appropriately adjust the parking facilities being used for each service. As an alternative to City-managed traffic control, parking facilities could not be used for back-to- back Church services and control of traffic would need to avoid encroaching on the public right-of- way. If a single service is offered or services are spaced at least 2 hours apart, the Church’s Traffic Team may be able to direct traffic without encroaching on the public right-of-way. First, a sandwich board could be placed at the west entrance to Car Park 1 (consistent with applicable sign ordinance provisions) when the 57 spaces there are full. Second, to reduce the conflict between eastbound and westbound vehicles at the entrance to Car Park 1, the volunteer at the intersection of Olive Street/Broadway should direct vehicles north to Center Street and Car Park 2 at all times, not just after Car Park 1 is full. Figure 3 illustrates the recommended placement of City traffic control or volunteers and the direction they would be guiding congregants. To reduce conflicts with vehicles arriving from multiple directions, it is recommended that vehicles be directed to different parking lots based on the direction of travel. Event personnel at the intersections of Anaheim Boulevard/Center Street, Olive Street/Center Street, and Olive Street/Broadway could direct vehicles either to Car Park 2 or Car Park 3 while other personnel at the intersections of Anaheim Boulevard/Broadway and Claudina Street/Broadway direct vehicles to Car Park 1. If Car Park 1 fills, then these last two would switch signs and also direct vehicles to the other lots. Splitting the traffic flow and directing vehicles to both parking structures parks vehicles faster and reduces conflict entering Car Park 1, which reduces the need for someone to direct traffic on 42nd Street. The person waiting on the roof of Car Park 1 could serve an additional function compared to the existing parking operation. Currently, this person indicates to the person on 42nd Street when the roof is full and the person on 42nd Street discourages additional vehicles from entering. If additional vehicles are inside the structure, they have to turn around and exit. Instead, the person on top of FIGURE3 I: \ A H M 1 5 0 4 \ G \ R e c o m m e n d e d S u n d a y P a r k i n g . c d r ( 8 / 3 1 / 2 0 1 7 ) Re c o m m e n d e d S u n d a y P a r k i n g O p e r a t i o n River Arena SO U R C E : G o o g l e E a r t h FE E T 20 0 10 0 0N ANAHEIM B L V D ANAHEIM B L V D OLIVE S T OLIVE S T C E N T E R S T C E N T E R S T BROADWAY BROADWAY PHILADE L P H I A S T PHILADE L P H I A S T CLAUDIN A S T CLAUDIN A S T L I N C O L N A V E L I N C O L N A V E 4 2 N D S T 4 2 N D S T Pr o j e c t Si t e Pr o j e c t Si t e Ca r P a r k 2 Ca r P a r k 2 Ca r Pa r k 1 Ca r Pa r k 1 Wi l l d a n Lo t Wi l l d a n Lo t Ca r P a r k 3 Ca r P a r k 3 Co m m u n i t y Ce n t e r L o t Co m m u n i t y Ce n t e r L o t LE G E N D - E n t r a n c e t o P a r k i n g L o t - V o l u n t e e r L o c a t i o n s - S i g n D i r e c t i o n - S i g n D i r e c t i o n i f C a r P a r k 1 i s F u l l P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 12 Car Park 1 could wait until the first vehicle enters the roof deck, then walk down the structure while counting the cars in line to park. The roof deck holds 133 vehicles, so once this person reaches the structure entrance, they would know the precise number of vehicles that could still enter. If this person were in radio communication with other personnel at Claudina Street/Broadway, he or she could coordinate when to flip the sign and direct vehicles to continue east on Broadway to Olive Street. If multiple services are held, special consideration must be given to the turnover period. Inbound vehicles should not be directed to a parking lot where the majority of occupants are trying to exit. The efficiency of both ingress and egress deteriorates when vehicles wait in the aisle to exchange a parking space. It would be most efficient to direct vehicles arriving for the second service into a parking lot that was not used for the first service. For example, if Car Park 1 and Car Park 3 were the primary lots used for the first service, inbound vehicles for the second service could be directed to Car Park 2. Vehicles traveling south on Anaheim Boulevard would be directed east on Center Street, and vehicles traveling east on Broadway could be directed to Olive Street and then approach Car Park 2 from westbound Center Street. After a sufficient number of vehicles have exited Car Park 1 (30 to 45 minutes), eastbound Broadway traffic could be directed to Car Park 1 along Claudina Street or Philadelphia Street. EXISTING PARKING DEMAND LSA coordinated with an independent third-party data collection firm, National Data and Surveying Services, Inc. (NDS), to collect parking accumulation data at Car Park 1 and Car Park 2 on a typical weekday morning (7:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.), a Saturday morning (7:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.), and on a Sunday (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). Parking accumulation data was collected at Car Park 3 and the Community Center parking lots on Sunday (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). Spot surveys were collected in Car Park 1 on a weekday afternoon and evening to confirm parking availability. Appendix A contains a summary of the collected data. In addition, this study utilizes data from the June 2015 Parking Management Plan for the Center City: MAKE Building (referred to in this study as the “MAKE Building Parking Management Plan”). On June 15, 2015, this plan was reviewed in conjunction with the Planning Commission’s approval of a conditional use permit and parking variance for the MAKE Building (Development Project No. 2015-00029). The variance allowed the MAKE Building to construct and to operate with no on-site parking and to rely on off-site parking, including the Willdan lot, Car Park 1 and Car Park 3, subject to a condition of approval that the availability of parking for this building was to be operated in accordance with the MAKE Building Parking Management Plan. Appendix A provides detailed data regarding the availability parking spaces in Car Park 1, 2 and 3 on a typical weekday and Saturday. Parking surveys conducted for Car Park 1 found at least 121 parking spaces available on a weekday and at least 292 parking spaces available on a Saturday. Parking surveys conducted for Car Park 2 found at least 247 parking spaces available on a weekday and at least 380 parking spaces available on Saturday. Parking surveys conducted for Car Park 3 found at least 405 parking spaces available on Saturday. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 13 Sunday parking demand was observed to be considerably higher for both Car Parks 1 and 2 than on weekdays or Saturday due to Church parking. During Church services on the surveyed Sunday, all parking areas in Car Park 1 were occupied by a car except for two handicap spaces, two 20-minute parking spaces, and two spaces on the top floor. Similarly, all parking spaces were filled on the first three floors and all but two parking spaces were filled on the fourth floor of Car Park 2. Church parking was not observed to currently affect Car Park 3. On the observed Sunday, all parking spaces in the Community Center lot were full between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m., with up to two additional vehicles parked in drive aisles. This parking demand may be partly affected by Church parking demand, as a few groups were directly observed to park in the Community Center lot and walk toward the Arena. In addition, demand from handicap placard vehicles exceeded the five designated spaces in the Willdan Building lot. Approximately 20 vehicles displaying handicap placards were observed in that lot. When parking data was collected in December 2015, a Sunday Farmers Market was held at the Packing District from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and the website for the Farmers Market directed people to park either at the Packing District or Car Park 1. (In May 2016, the Farmers Market moved to Fridays.) Prior to 10:00 a.m., only two cars that may have been attributable to the Farmers Market were observed by the parking surveyors to park in Car Park 1. The occupants of these cars were observed walking toward the crosswalk at Anaheim Boulevard/Broadway in the direction of the Farmers Market. Between 10:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., Car Park 1 was essentially full. As Table B shows, more vehicles were parked in Car Park 1 at 2:00 p.m. than between 3:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., which may show use of Car Park 1 by latecomers to the Farmers Market or other uses. Higher parking demand at 2:00 p.m. could also result if exiting the Church and parking structures requires more than 30 minutes. However, based on observation, LSA believes Farmers Market patrons are not a major contributor to parking demand in Car Park 1 between 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Table B: Sunday Maximum Observed Parking Demand Car Park 1 (519 Total Spaces) Car Park 2 (613 Total Spaces) Total (1,132 Spaces) Parked Available Parked Available Parked Available Before Church (8:00 AM–9:00 AM) 115 404 203 410 318 814 During Church (11:00AM–12:00PM) 513 6 538 75 1,051 81 2:00 PM 264 255 285 328 549 583 3:00 PM–6:00 PM 141 378 206 407 347 785 7:00 PM–10:00 PM 117 402 206 407 323 809 As described above, not all of the vehicles parked within Car Park 1 and 2, the Willdan Building lot and the Community Center lot may be attributed to the Church. Some Farmers Market patrons may be attributed to parking demand in Car Park 1. In addition, City vehicles are parked overnight in Car Park 1 and some non-Church vehicles (including stored vehicles in leased spaces) may be attributed to parking demand in Car Park 2. Table B shows the number of vehicles parked in Car Park 1 and 2 before the arrival of congregants, during Church services, and after the end of Church services. Because parking spaces reserved for specific purposes (i.e., City vehicles, City employees, and P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 14 carpool) on weekdays were used by visitors on weekends, the total parking supply for each structure is shown. In order to calculate the total number of vehicles attributable to Church congregants, the maximum number of vehicles observed in each section of the parking lots was compared to the number of vehicles parked in those sections prior to the observed arrival of Church vehicles. For Car Park 1, the comparison count was taken at 8:00 a.m. For Car Park 2, the comparison count was taken at 9:00 a.m. Table C shows this calculation of estimated Church parking demand. Although subsequent observations of Church operations with two Church services seemed to indicate some Church patrons had parked in the Community Center lot, on the day data was collected, no Church patrons were directly observed parking in the Community Center lot. Table C: Church Parking Demand Maximum Cars Parked Estimated Church Demand Before Church During Church Car Park 1 115 513 398 Car Park 2 203 538 335 Car Park 31 N/A N/A N/A Willdan 0 20 20 TOTAL 318 1,071 753 1 No Church patrons were believed to park in this structure in the existing condition. Therefore, parking data was not collected. N/A = Not Applicable As Table C shows, the total Sunday parking demand for the Church is approximately 398 vehicles in Car Park 1, 335 vehicles in Car Park 2, and 20 handicap placard vehicles in the Willdan Building surface lot, for a total of 753 vehicles. This demand is lower than the Church’s estimate of 850–900 parking spaces, and the AMC requirement for 833 parking spaces for the Arena, but higher than the previous parking lease for 600 spaces. Parking capacity in Car Park 1 and 2 was sufficient to satisfy the parking demand generated by the Church; however, during a single Church service, 93 percent of available parking spaces in these lots were occupied. FUTURE PARKING DEMAND Center City is rapidly evolving and the City has committed some of the currently available parking spaces for known future projects. For example, expansion of the Packing District, which is currently underway, will affect demand for parking within Center City. In the longer term, both the Willdan lot and Community Center lot are slated for eventual development. This would affect parking both by reducing parking supply and potentially increasing parking demand. This section examines prior commitments of parking supply and estimates future parking conditions resulting from the relocation of parked vehicles from the Willdan lot and Community Center lot to other Center City parking facilities. These conditions focus on Sunday, when the Church would have its highest parking demand. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 15 For the purposes of this analysis, the Willdan lot parking demand (for the Church and other users) is presumed to relocate to Car Park 1 and the Community Center lot parking demand (for the Church and other users) is presumed to relocate to Car Park 2. When the Willdan lot closes, handicap parking for the Church could be relocated to the west side of the Car Park 1 ground floor. Increased off-site parking demand for the Packing District is presumed to be accommodated in Car Park 3, which is connected to the Packing District by a trolley service. Surveys of existing Sunday parking demand were collected at the Willdan lot and the Community Center lot. Table D presents the highest observed parking demand during various periods of the day. The lunchtime period represents parking demand when the Church holds services. The 2:00 p.m. period represents parking demand at the conclusion of Church services. Table D also presents the anticipated off-site parking demand for the Packing District expansion. This value was derived by applying Urban Land Institute Shared Parking time-of-day factors to the peak parking demand for the MAKE Building, which is under construction. Off-site parking estimates for the MAKE Building also presume that Sunday parking demand will be about 75 percent of Saturday parking demand. Table D shows that the known changes coming to Center City could increase parking demand by up to 224 spaces during the lunchtime period, when Church services are currently held. Table D: Projected New Sunday Parking Demand Willdan Lot Community Center Lot Packing District Expansion Total Morning 26 30 0 56 Lunch 46 132 46 224 2:00 PM 27 77 38 142 3:00 PM–6:00 PM 17 69 64 150 7:00 PM–10:00 PM 14 28 68 110 Table B disclosed the existing Sunday parking demand in Car Park 1 and Car Park 2. Table E restates this data, reflecting the effects of the closure of the Willdan lot and the Community Center lot. Table E also shows the future parking demand in Car Park 3. This calculation combines existing observed Sunday parking demand in Car Park 3 and the increased off-site parking demand for the Packing District. Table E shows that relocating parking demand in the Willdan lot to Car Park 1 and relocating parking demand in the Community Center lot to Car Park 2 would exceed the parking supply in Car Park 1 and Car Park 2 during the lunchtime period when the Church holds services. This shortfall could be avoided if the lease that currently occupies the top floor of Car Park 2 is terminated when the Community Center lot closes, or if Car Park 3 is included in the parking supply being considered for Church parking. It should be noted that use of Car Park 3 is included in the draft parking lease agreement between the City and the Church. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 16 Table E: Projected Sunday Parking Demand with the 11:00 AM–1:00 PM Church Service Car Park 1 (519 Total Spaces) Car Park 2 (613 Total Spaces) Car Park 3 (422 Public Spaces) Total (1,554 Spaces) Parked Available Parked Available Parked Available Parked Available Before Church 141 378 233 380 63 359 437 1,117 During Church 559 -40 670 -57 197 225 1,426 128 2:00 PM 291 228 362 251 184 238 837 717 3:00 PM–6:00 PM 158 361 275 338 196 226 629 925 7:00 PM–10:00 PM 131 388 234 379 153 269 518 1,036 Table E, includes the 2:00 p.m. shoulder period after the single Church service. The data collected showed lingering demand for parking spaces at the beginning of the 2:00 p.m. hour, which was about 1 hour after the conclusion of the Church service. As mentioned previously, direct observation of parking operations was made before and after Church services at the Arena. Vehicles were observed inbound for more than 1 hour prior to the start of single Church services. The Arena requires 30 minutes for congregants to exit after a service, and a steady stream of vehicles was observed exiting Car Park 1 for 50 minutes after services. Observations of residual parking demand and the time required to empty and fill the Arena indicate that care should be taken when planning the turnover of parking spaces between services. FUTURE PARKING DEMAND: INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF CHURCH SERVICES As indicated in the CUP application, the church is requesting to hold two additional services with proposed times of 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., 12:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. As the congregation grows, the parking demand for each of these services could grow to match the observed parking demand for the single Church service. Table C indicated this potential parking demand is 753 parking spaces. Analysis of Table B shows that the residual Church parking demand 1 hour after the conclusion of services (i.e., 2:00 p.m. after the single 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. service) is approximately 200 vehicles. These values can be applied to the total parked and available parking spaces disclosed in Table E to calculate future parking demand with no Church services or future parking demand with the proposed Church services at 9:00 a.m., 12:30 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. Table F presents this future parking demand with the increase in the number of Church services and 90 minutes between each service to reduce the interaction between parking demand for one service and another. As Table F shows, it is possible for the parking supply within Center City to accommodate three services if appropriate time is scheduled between services. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 17 Table F: Projected Sunday Parking Demand with Recommended 9:00 AM, 12:30 PM, and 4:00 PM Church Services No Service (1,554 Total Spaces) With Services (1,554 Total Spaces) Parked Available Parked Available Before Church (8:00 AM) 437 1,117 437 1,117 First Service (9:00 AM–11:00 AM 673 881 1,426 128 Second Service (12:30 PM–2:30 PM 637 917 1,390 164 3:00 PM 629 925 829 725 Third Service (4:00 PM–6:00 PM 629 925 1,382 172 7:00 PM–10:00 PM 518 1,036 518 1,036 FUTURE PARKING DEMAND: WEEKDAYS AND SATURDAY Tables E through F illustrate the parking supply during Sundays. Table G shows the projected parking demand on Saturdays. The values in Table G derive from empirical data of parking demand and imputed parking demand based on observed peak utilization. Similar to the discussion of future parking demand above, Table G accounts for the expansion of the Packing District and the potential closure of the Willdan Lot and Community Center Lot. Table G shows that within Car Park 1, Car Park 2, and Car Park 3, the future peak utilization is forecast to be about half of the available spaces, which is similar to the conclusions of the Make Building Parking Management Plan. Table G: Projected Saturday Parking Demand Car Park 1 (519 Total Spaces) Car Park 2 (613 Total Spaces) Car Park 3 (422 Public Spaces) Total (1,554 Spaces) Parked Available Parked Available Parked Available Parked Available Morning 8:00 AM–10:00 AM 117 402 260 353 125 297 502 1,052 Lunch 11:00 AM–1:00 PM 146 373 359 254 217 205 722 832 Afternoon 2:00 PM–4:00 PM 170 349 419 194 235 187 824 730 Dinner 5:00 PM–6:00 PM 155 364 411 202 263 159 829 725 Evening 7:00 PM–10:00 PM 220 299 346 267 266 156 832 722 P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 18 On weekdays, parking demand in these three parking structures is driven primarily by City government. However, Center City has several businesses and residential developments that rely on the City’s shared parking resources. The City manages their parking facilities and keeps track of the parking obligations for each facility through parking lease agreements. Within the 519 parking spaces in Car Park 1, the City maintains an agreement for 18 parking spaces to be leased to Willdan Building employees. The City has also determined that 40 parking spaces are set aside for City-owned vehicles and 200 parking spaces are set aside for City employees (113 spaces are marked for City vehicles or employees). After 5:00 p.m., demand for parking spaces by City employees is greatly reduced on most days. Parking demand in Car Park 1 is affected by visitors to City Hall. Empirical data collected on a typical weekday found the maximum parking demand to be 341 parking spaces. However, two Mondays a month the City holds Planning Commission meetings and two Tuesdays a month the City holds City Council meetings. Both events generate parking demand by City employees and the general public. Attendance at both types of meetings is highly variable, sometimes being nominal and sometimes spilling over from the Council Chambers to additional seating set up in the lobby. The City has established leases for 363 parking spaces within Car Park 2. Of these, 97 parking spaces are leased for residential use, 155 are leased for nearby businesses, and 111 are leased for business use on a month-to month basis. The City has also set aside 70 parking spaces for City employees. On the ground floor, 36 parking spaces are marked “reserved.” Car Park 3 has parking spaces set aside for City-owned vehicles and City employees on levels A and B of the structure, to which there is gated access. Within the public parking spaces analyzed in this report, the City has established leases for 203 parking spaces with nearby offices and retail. The lease agreements specify time-of-day and not all leases obligate parking spaces for the entire day. In addition to the gated parking levels, the City has determined that 40 parking spaces are set aside for City-owned vehicles and 100 parking spaces are set aside for City employees within the publicly accessible parking levels. Of these 343 obligated parking spaces, 59 are marked for permit or carpool parking. Table H shows weekday parking demand based on the City’s tracking of contractual commitments with various Center City parking users as described above. As Table H shows, more parking spaces are available after 7:00 p.m., when the demands for parking spaces from City government and business users is reduced. Table H: Weekday Parking Commitments Car Park 1 (519 Total Spaces) Car Park 2 (613 Total Spaces) Car Park 3 (422 Public Spaces) Total (1,554 Spaces) Demand Available Obligated Available Obligated Available Obligated Available Before 7:00 PM 341 178 433 180 343 90 1,117 437 After 7:00 PM 238 281 208 405 102 320 548 1,006 Note: Unavailable parking number is the higher of obligated parking leases, reserved spaces, or observed demand. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 19 PARKING SUPPLIED TO CHURCH The draft parking lease agreement (dated March 1, 2018) between the Church and the City specifies that: • Licensee shall have the right to use up to 10 parking spaces in Car Park 1, Monday through Sunday, for use by Licensee’s employees/administrative personnel. • Licensee shall have the right to use up to 100 parking spaces on a first-come, first-served basis, Monday through Saturday except during Planning Commission or City Council meetings, for use by Licensee’s Permittees. • Licensee shall have the right to use up to 333 parking spaces on Wednesday evenings, 7:00 p.m. to midnight, for use by Licensee’s Permittees. • Licensee shall have the right to use up to 200 parking spaces on Friday evenings, 6:00 p.m. to midnight, for use by Licensee’s Permittees. • Licensee shall have the right to use up to 753 parking spaces in the Parking Facilities on Sundays, 7:00 a.m. to midnight, for use by Licensee’s Permittees, with priority for parking in the following order: Car Park 1, Car Park 2, and Car Park 3. Use of the Willdan Lot shall be limited to Licensee’s Permittees with a valid disabled person placard or plate issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles, or oversized vehicles. The need for additional parking supply above and beyond the leased parking spaces (i.e., emergency prayer and counseling, bookstore, and Café) would have to be acquired by individual patrons at market rate from the available pool of public parking spaces. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This section will consider each of the points requested by the Church in its application and will discuss them individually. Additional Sunday Services The Church’s application requests that the CUP be amended to permit up to three services on Sunday using the 2,500-seat Arena. Proposed service times are 9:00 a.m., 12:30 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. As discussed above, the Church generated demand for 753 parking spaces on the day of observation. Increasing the number of services could reduce this parking demand per service in the short term. However, in the long term, demand could return to 753 parking spaces for one or more of the services. The analysis summarized in Table E shows that for future parking conditions, the exclusive use of Car Park 1 and Car Park 2 may not be possible. The future accommodation of Church parking demand will require the inclusion of Car Park 3 in the potential parking supply. Inclusion of Car Park 3 in the potential parking supply becomes all the more necessary when considering the logistics of turning over parking spaces to accommodate multiple Church services. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 20 Ingress and egress from the Arena and parking lots serving the Arena requires time. Because of the number of people and parking spaces involved, more time is required for ingress and egress than a typical neighborhood church. Observations before and after services revealed that congregants begin slowly arriving 2 hours before the start of services, with a steady flow of vehicles beginning 1 hour before the service begins. Vehicles require almost 1 hour to exit the parking lot. Unless services are spaced 2 hours apart, it is likely that vehicles arriving for the second service would not be able to quickly find an available parking space. As described in the Recommended Parking Operation section, accommodation of multiple events would be best achieved by directing vehicles arriving for the second service into a parking lot not fully occupied by first-service vehicles. This will require use of Car Parks 1, 2, and 3. If control of the flow of traffic requires temporary closure of public roads or traffic control of an uncontrolled intersection, then Anaheim Police Department Traffic Control officers or City-trained civilian contractors should provide traffic control. Even with careful control of vehicle flow and parking operations, a minimum spacing of Church services is needed to allow people to fully exit and enter the Arena. Observations of Church services show that 30 minutes are required to fully exit the 2,500-seat Arena. Observations of Church services also indicate that approximately 1 hour is needed for the orderly arrival of patrons. Analysis provided in Table F shows that a future parking deficiency would not occur with minimum spacing of 90 minutes between services. Therefore, it is recommended that a minimum of 90 minutes separate the end of one Church service and the start of another. Recommendation: Additional Sunday services can be accommodated in the future if given the flexibility to use available parking spaces within Car Parks 1, 2, and 3. A minimum of 90 minutes should be provided between the end of one service and the start of another, as currently proposed by the Church. Administrative Parking Spaces The Church’s application requests that 10 parking spaces be designated for Church employees in Car Park 1 or Car Park 2 between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. As shown in Tables G and H, Car Park 1 has sufficient vacant parking spaces to accommodate this request (even after closure of the 42-space Willdan lot). This request for 10 parking spaces in Car Park 1 is included in the draft parking lease agreement. Recommendation: Sufficient parking is available to accommodate this request. Group Meetings and Activities The Church’s application requests use of the classrooms, lobby, or Arena for up to 150 attendees between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Those parking spaces would be used by those attending public evening devotionals, intercessory prayer meetings, Bible seminars, or evening civic group meetings, such as Alcoholics Anonymous. Based on an average vehicle occupancy of 1.5 persons per vehicle observed for similar types of group activities, 150 attendees is anticipated to generate demand for 100 parking spaces. As shown P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 21 in Tables G and H, Car Park 1 has sufficient available parking spaces to accommodate this request on typical evenings; however, occasional high demand for parking generated by Planning Commission and City Council meetings may mean that sufficient parking would not be available some Monday and Tuesday nights. This request for 100 parking spaces is included in the draft parking lease agreement with an exception for Planning Commission and City Council meeting dates. Recommendation: Permit civic group meetings from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, except during Planning Commission or City Council meetings, on the condition that meetings be limited to 150 attendees without a special use permit. Saturday Church Activities and Group Meetings The Church’s application requests use of the Arena between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., Saturday for up to 150 attendees of church activities or group meetings. Based on an average vehicle occupancy of 1.5 persons per vehicle observed for similar types of group activities, 150 attendees is anticipated to generate demand for 100 parking spaces. As shown in Table G, Car Park 1 has sufficient available parking spaces to accommodate this request throughout the day. The draft parking lease agreement includes 100 parking spaces on Saturday evenings. During the daytime hours, attendees would acquire parking on a first-come/first-served basis. Recommendation: Permit church activities and group meetings from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Saturday, on the condition that meetings be limited to 150 attendees without a special use permit. Emergency Prayer and Counseling The Church’s application states an intent to maintain a 24-hour operation on site for services such as grief counseling, suicide prevention, and protection from physical abuse. This operation is not anticipated to generate a significant amount of parking demand and available parking could be acquired on a first-come, first-served basis. Recommendation: This request would not affect parking. Bookstore The Church’s application states an intent to operate a bookstore concurrent with other events being held in the Arena. This use would be ancillary to Arena use and would serve the same people already at the Arena. The bookstore would likely not generate its own, or additional, parking demand. Table A shows that the bookstore would be expected to generate demand for two parking spaces per the AMC. Tables F, G, and H show that sufficient parking supply is available each day of the week to accommodate this demand. Recommendation: Sufficient parking is available to accommodate this request. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 22 River Café The Church’s application states an intent to operate a 3,287 sf café with seating for up to 115 people daily from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The Café would serve breakfast, lunch, and dinner. This use would generate additional parking demand. Even on Sunday, when the Café would serve congregants who are already at the Arena, the Café has the potential to extend their stay and thus affect total parking demand. On Sundays, the Café could generate parking demand at a rate of 0.02 spaces per person for the maximum capacity of the assembly space, which equates to 50 parking spaces. On weekdays and Saturday, as a general restaurant with more than 20 seats, the Café would require 10 parking spaces per 1,000 sf. As such, 33 parking spaces would be required. Table F shows a minimum of 128 parking spaces projected to be available on Sunday, even with three services with 90 minutes between services, which is sufficient to accommodate the café. Table G shows a minimum of 299 parking spaces projected to be available on Saturday, which is sufficient to accommodate the potential 33 parking space demand of the Café. Table H shows a minimum of 178 parking spaces to be available on a weekday, which is sufficient to accommodate the potential 33 parking space demand of the Café. Recommendation: Sufficient parking is available to accommodate this request. Sound Stage/Multipurpose Room The Church’s application seeks approval to use the multipurpose room as a sound stage and set for a television talk show anticipated to be taped two or three times a month during daytime hours. As shown in Table A, parking demand for the studio is anticipated to be six parking spaces. The draft parking lease agreement includes 10 parking spaces in Car Park 1 for use by Church employees and administrative personnel. Even if the six parking spaces required for the sound stage are additive, Tables G and H, show Car Park 1 has sufficient vacant parking spaces to accommodate this request (even after closure of the 42-space Willdan lot). Recommendation: Sufficient parking is available to accommodate this request. Occasional Leasing as Conference/Performing Arts Center The Church’s application seeks approval to hold public events in the 2,500-seat Arena that could be scheduled between 7:00 p.m. and midnight on Wednesday, or from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. Friday evenings. Whereas the Church was found to generate demand for 753 or greater parking spaces, the average vehicle occupancy for a family-centric church is generally higher than the average vehicle occupancy for a performing arts center or auditorium. The AMC parking requirement for the 2,500-seat Arena is 833 parking spaces. Satisfying this level of parking demand would require use of both Car Park 1 and Car Park 2. However, Car Park 2 serves the Anaheim Community Center, which could hold public events during the same hours as requested by the Arena. In consideration of this and the known future commitments regarding parking, it is not certain that sufficient parking supply will remain during all of the times considered for special events. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 23 Sufficient parking may be available in Car Parks 1 and 2 to accommodate use of the Arena in the evenings, but potential parking conflicts with other approved uses prevent a commitment of those parking spaces without detailed knowledge of the parking needs of other uses at the time of proposed events. The request for 500 attendees in the Arena (333 parking spaces based on an average vehicle occupancy of 1.5 persons per vehicle observed for similar types of group activities) from 7:00 p.m. to midnight on Wednesday evenings is included in the draft parking lease agreement. The request for 300 attendees in the Arena (200 parking spaces based on an average vehicle occupancy of 1.5 persons per vehicle observed for similar types of group activities) from 6:00 p.m. to midnight on Friday evenings is included in the draft parking lease agreement. Table H shows sufficient capacity in Car Park 1 to accommodate this lease. With a guaranteed supply of 333 parking spaces on Wednesday evening and 200 parking spaces on Friday evening, there would not be concern regarding conflict with other Center City uses. However, the parking spaces being leased would not be sufficient to accommodate full use of the Arena. Recommendation: Permit occasional use of the Arena as a conference center from 7:00 p.m. to midnight Wednesday evenings on the condition that events be limited to 500 attendees. Permit occasional use of the Arena as a conference center from 6:00 p.m. to midnight Friday evenings on the condition that events be limited to 300 attendees. Consider public events in the 2,500-seat Arena on a case-by-case basis through a special use permit for events that exceed 150 attendees on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, or Saturday; 300 attendees on Friday; or 500 attendees on Wednesday. CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS This study provides an estimated parking demand for 753 parking spaces for the 2,500-seat Arena during current Sunday Church services. Each of the proposed multiple Church services could require this amount of parking spaces as the congregation grows. This study also identifies that future off- street parking conditions will likely require use of Car Parks 1, 2, and 3 to satisfy the parking demand for the Church and proposed ancillary uses. Observations of parking operation led to a few comments that were included in the report. After reviewing the application, existing parking conditions, and future parking conditions, LSA makes the following recommendations: • The City should consider termination of the lease of the top parking deck of Car Park 2 at the time the Community Services parking lot is closed. • Additional Sunday services, as requested by the applicant, can be accommodated in the future if given the flexibility to use available parking spaces within Car Parks 1, 2, and 3. • A minimum of 90 minutes should be provided between the end of one service and the start of another, as currently proposed by the Church. • Maintain the draft lease agreement provision of 10 parking spaces in Car Park 1 Monday through Sunday. • Permit civic group meetings from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, except during Planning Commission or City Council meetings, on the condition that meetings be limited to 150 attendees without special use permit. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» 24 • Emergency prayer and counseling, the bookstore, and the sound stage could be accommodated in Car Park 1, 2 and 3 without impacting other users of the parking structure. • Sufficient parking is available in Car Park 1 to accommodate the River Café. • Maintain the draft lease agreement provisions of 333 parking spaces from 7:00 p.m. to midnight on Wednesday and permit occasional use of the Arena as a conference center on the condition that events be limited to 500 attendees. • Maintain the draft lease agreement provisions of 200 parking spaces from 6:00 p.m. to midnight on Friday and permit occasional use of the Arena as a conference center on the condition that events be limited to 300 attendees. • Approve public events in the 2,500-seat Arena that exceed 150 attendees on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, or Saturday; 300 attendees on Friday; or 500 attendees on Wednesday on a case-by- case basis through a special use permit. • Traffic control during ingress and egress of Church services would be best provided by Anaheim Police Department Traffic Control officers or City trained civilian contractors. • Based on observations of traffic flow for Church services, parking operations could be improved by: ○ Placing a sandwich board at the west entrance to Car Park 1 when the 57 parking spaces there are full; ○ Having volunteers at the intersections of Anaheim Boulevard/Center Street, Olive Street/ Center Street, and Olive Street/Broadway direct vehicles toward Car Park 2 to reduce conflict entering Car Park 1; ○ Ensuring that no volunteers stand within the public right-of-way; ○ Having the volunteer on the roof deck of Car Park 1 count vehicles within the structure once the first vehicle parks on the roof deck, then place a sandwich board indicating the lot is full when 133 vehicles have entered; and communicating by radio between volunteers at Car Park 1, the intersection of Claudina Street/Broadway, and the intersection of Anaheim Boulevard/Broadway. P ARKING A NALYSIS J UNE 2018 R IVER A RENA C ITY OF A NAHEIM , C ALIFORNIA P:\AHM1504\Parking Analysis 8 RLSO.docx «06/08/18» APPENDIX A PARKING ACCUMULATION DATA Lo c a t i o n : Pa r k i n g L o t s Day:Tuesday Ci t y : An a h e i m Date:12/1/2015 LE V E L 0 2 L E V E L 0 3 L E V E L 0 4 L E V E L 0 5 L E V E L 0 6 HC R e g u l a r H C V a n p o o l Re g R e s e r v e d H C R e g H C R e s e r v e d V a n p o o l M o t o r c y c l e R e g R e g R e g R e g R e g Sp a c e s 3 2 5 Sp a c e s 4 4 2 1 6 7 8 1 99 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 4 6 1 3 7: 0 0 1 0 1 7: 0 0 41 4 5 5 4 0 69 3 3 1 9 5 1 8 9 32 0 8: 0 0 2 0 2 8: 0 0 43 4 5 7 6 0 74 3 8 1 8 4 9 8 9 33 3 9: 0 0 2 1 3 9: 0 0 43 4 5 7 6 0 81 4 3 1 7 4 8 8 7 34 1 10 : 0 0 2 0 2 10 : 0 0 43 4 4 7 8 0 94 4 9 1 9 4 8 8 5 36 1 11 : 0 0 2 0 2 11 : 0 0 39 1 5 5 7 8 0 89 5 3 1 7 4 9 8 4 36 6 12 : 0 0 2 1 3 12 : 0 0 37 9 6 7 8 0 84 5 6 2 7 4 7 8 5 36 6 GR O U N D LE V E L A LE V E L 1 A LEVEL 3B Em p l o y e e V i s i t o r H C E V R e s e r v e d 2 0 M i n u t e s M o t o r c y c l e R e g u l a r E m p l o y e e Re s e r v e d Ci t y P o o l c a r s On l y C i t y C a r p o o l Pa r k i n g O n l y Vi s i t o r R e g u l a r Re s e r v e d Pa r k i n g O n l y Vi s i t o r H C 20 M i n u t e s Pi c k U p Re g u l a r C i t y C a r p o o l R e g u l a r Sp a c e s 2 6 1 6 1 0 4 1 65 2 0 1 0 5 32 6 9 4 3 1 7 4 1 59 4 1 3 3 5 1 9 7: 0 0 25 9 1 4 0 0 39 2 0 7 1 3 21 7 5 2 0 49 0 20 213 8: 0 0 26 1 5 1 4 0 0 51 2 0 7 1 5 35 7 7 2 0 42 0 19 242 9: 0 0 25 1 4 4 4 0 0 62 2 0 6 1 10 5 8 9 11 2 0 47 1 19 293 10 : 0 0 26 1 6 5 4 0 0 65 2 0 6 1 10 6 3 1 7 1 2 3 1 45 1 20 315 11 : 0 0 26 1 6 5 3 1 1 65 2 0 4 1 14 6 5 2 1 9 2 0 42 1 19 315 12 : 0 0 21 1 6 6 4 0 1 50 1 9 4 0 11 6 0 1 8 8 2 0 21 1 20 262 14 : 0 0 21 1 6 2 4 0 59 9 5 2 28 6 0 1 0 3 6 2 0 63 1 23 341 20 : 0 0 20 1 6 1 3 0 60 5 5 0 28 1 1 2 2 1 0 3 0 40 0 14 238 Pr e p a r e d b y N a t i o n a l D a t a & S u r v e y i n g S e r v i c e s PA R K I N G S T U D Y TI M E AN A H E I M C I V I C CE N T E R P A R K I N G L O T TO T A L TI M E CE N T E R S T P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TO T A L LE V E L 0 1 TI M E CI T Y H A L L P U B L I C P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TOTAL GR O U N D L E V E L B LE V E L 1 B LE V E L 2 B L E V E L 2 A Lo c a t i o n : Pa r k i n g L o t s Day:Saturday Ci t y : An a h e i m Date:12/5/2015 LE V E L 0 2 L E V E L 0 3 L E V E L 0 4 L E V E L 0 5 L E V E L 0 6 HC R e g u l a r H C V a n p o o l Re g R e s e r v e d H C R e g H C R e s e r v e d V a n p o o l M o t o r c y c l e R e g R e g R e g R e g R e g Sp a c e s 3 2 5 Sp a c e s 4 4 2 1 6 7 8 1 99 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 4 6 1 3 7: 0 0 0 0 0 7: 0 0 25 2 1 6 6 0 0 30 0 9 49 8 7 23 3 8: 0 0 0 0 0 8: 0 0 25 1 8 5 6 0 0 28 3 9 49 8 7 23 0 9: 0 0 0 0 0 9: 0 0 25 1 4 6 7 0 0 29 3 9 43 8 7 22 3 10 : 0 0 0 0 0 10 : 0 0 22 1 9 6 7 0 0 25 4 9 39 8 7 21 8 11 : 0 0 0 0 0 11 : 0 0 26 2 1 6 7 0 0 27 4 9 39 8 7 22 6 12 : 0 0 0 0 0 12 : 0 0 26 2 1 5 7 0 0 29 2 9 38 8 7 22 4 GR O U N D LE V E L A LE V E L 1 A LEVEL 3B Em p l o y e e V i s i t o r H C E V R e s e r v e d 2 0 M i n u t e s M o t o r c y c l e R e g u l a r E m p l o y e e Re s e r v e d Ci t y P o o l c a r s On l y C i t y C a r p o o l Pa r k i n g O n l y Vi s i t o r R e g u l a r Re s e r v e d Pa r k i n g O n l y Vi s i t o r H C 20 M i n u t e s Pi c k U p Re g u l a r C i t y C a r p o o l R e g u l a r Sp a c e s 2 6 1 6 1 0 4 1 65 2 0 1 0 5 32 6 9 4 3 1 7 4 1 59 4 1 3 3 5 1 9 7: 0 0 10 6 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 0 4 1 2 1 0 1 31 0 20 90 8: 0 0 11 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 0 4 1 3 1 0 0 33 0 20 95 9: 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 8 0 6 1 4 3 0 0 33 0 20 113 10 : 0 0 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 0 8 0 6 1 4 3 0 0 33 0 16 115 11 : 0 0 14 1 3 0 0 0 0 20 0 8 0 5 1 4 2 0 0 33 0 16 116 12 : 0 0 13 1 3 0 0 0 0 19 0 7 0 5 1 3 2 0 0 33 0 18 114 Pr e p a r e d b y N a t i o n a l D a t a & S u r v e y i n g S e r v i c e s PA R K I N G S T U D Y TO T A L TI M E TI M E TI M E AN A H E I M C I V I C CE N T E R P A R K I N G L O T TO T A L TOTAL LE V E L 0 1 CE N T E R S T P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E CI T Y H A L L P U B L I C P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E GR O U N D L E V E L B LE V E L 1 B LE V E L 2 B L E V E L 2 A Project #:15-1085 Day:Saturday City:Anaheim Date:4/4/2015 TIME Regular HC Regular HC Vanpool TOTAL Spaces 37 3 2 42 10:00 AM 2 0 0 2 11:00 AM 4 0 0 4 12:00 PM 7 0 0 7 1:00 PM 13 0 0 13 2:00 PM 17 0 0 17 3:00 PM 15 0 0 15 4:00 PM 9 0 0 9 5:00 PM 13 0 0 13 6:00 PM 20 0 0 20 7:00 PM 19 0 0 19 8:00 PM 18 0 0 18 9:00 PM 20 0 0 20 10:00 PM 13 0 0 13 11:00 PM 9 0 0 9 12:00 AM 3 0 0 3 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services PARKING STUDY EDD LOT Pr o j e c t # : 15 - 1 0 8 5 Day:Saturday Ci t y : An a h e i m Date:4/4/2015 Re g u l a r El e c t r i c Ve h i c l e Pa r k i n g O n l y Ut i l i t i e s Ve h i c l e P o o l Se c u r i t y Ve h i c l e O n l y Re s e r v e d H C R e g u l a r Ov e r s i z e d Ve h i c l e Mo t o r c y c l e R e g u l a r Of f i c e Pa r k i n g EV P a r k i n g On l y HC R e g u l a r H C V a n p o o l R e g u l a r Ca r p o o l Pa r k i n g Ov e r s i z e d Ve h i c l e HC M o t o r c y c l e R e g u l a r H C R e g u l a r H C V a n p o o l Ov e r s i z e d Ve h i c l e EV P a r k i n g On l y RegularOversized VehicleHC R e g u l a r Oversized Vehicle Sp a c e s 4 3 4 10 1 7 2 99 4 44 1 3 4 2 42 31 9 3 97 3 1 3 5 102 3 4 106 8 641 10 : 0 0 A M 38 4 8 0 0 0 8 1 0 12 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 91 11 : 0 0 A M 38 4 8 0 0 0 9 1 0 10 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 95 12 : 0 0 P M 38 4 8 0 0 0 9 1 0 15 0 1 2 0 15 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 105 1: 0 0 P M 38 4 8 0 0 0 11 1 0 16 0 2 2 0 20 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 116 2: 0 0 P M 38 4 8 0 0 0 10 1 0 17 0 0 2 0 25 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 119 3: 0 0 P M 35 4 8 0 0 0 41 1 0 14 0 1 1 0 26 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 145 4: 0 0 P M 33 4 8 0 0 0 41 1 0 15 0 2 1 1 25 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 145 5: 0 0 P M 33 4 8 0 0 0 41 1 0 15 0 2 1 1 23 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 145 6: 0 0 P M 33 4 8 0 0 0 39 1 0 16 0 2 1 1 15 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 138 7: 0 0 P M 33 4 8 0 0 0 38 1 0 14 0 2 1 1 16 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 132 8: 0 0 P M 33 4 8 0 0 0 37 1 0 17 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 135 9: 0 0 P M 33 4 8 0 0 0 37 1 0 13 0 1 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 128 10 : 0 0 P M 33 4 8 0 0 0 37 1 0 9 0 0 1 0 12 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 111 11 : 0 0 P M 33 4 8 0 0 0 37 1 0 10 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 109 12 : 0 0 A M 33 4 8 0 0 0 37 1 0 7 0 1 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 105 No t e s : Re s t r i c t e d P a r k i n g A r e a C i t y o f A n a h e i m V e h i c l e d i s p l a y i n g P u r p l e H a n g T a g O n l y i n L e v e l s A & B o n l y 2- h r m a x i m u m p a r k i n g f o r l e v e l s 1 & 2 o n l y TOTAL Pr e p a r e d b y N a t i o n a l D a t a & S u r v e y i n g S e r v i c e s PA R K I N G S T U D Y LO T 2 TI M E LE V E L 2 LE V E L 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 LE V E L B ( U t i l i t y V e h i c l e s O n l y ) LE V E L A LE V E L 1 Pr o j e c t # : 15 - 1 0 8 5 Day:Saturday Ci t y : An a h e i m Date:4/4/2015 GR O U N D LE V E L A LE V E L 1 A LEVEL 3B Em p l o y e e V i s i t o r H C E V R e s e r v e d 2 0 M i n u t e M o t o r c y c l e R e g u l a r E m p l o y e e Re s e r v e d Ci t y P o o l c a r s On l y C i t y C a r p o o l Pa r k i n g O n l y Vi s i t o r R e g u l a r Re s e r v e d Pa r k i n g O n l y Vi s i t o r H C 20 M i n u t e Pi c k - U p Regular C i t y C a r p o o l R e g u l a r Sp a c e s 26 16 10 4 1 65 20 10 5 32 69 43 17 4 1 59 4 133 519 10 : 0 0 A M 11 4 0 2 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 19 0 5 65 11 : 0 0 A M 11 5 1 1 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 19 0 5 66 12 : 0 0 P M 12 11 2 1 0 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 21 0 5 76 1: 0 0 P M 11 11 2 1 0 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 5 5 0 0 19 0 6 76 2: 0 0 P M 12 10 2 2 0 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 6 5 0 0 21 0 6 80 3: 0 0 P M 12 12 2 3 0 0 11 0 5 0 5 0 6 5 0 0 20 0 6 87 4: 0 0 P M 13 9 0 1 0 0 12 0 5 0 5 0 7 2 0 0 22 0 11 87 5: 0 0 P M 13 9 0 1 0 0 8 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 23 0 7 73 6: 0 0 P M 12 12 0 1 0 0 10 0 5 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 23 0 7 77 7: 0 0 P M 12 15 0 1 0 0 20 0 5 0 4 0 5 1 0 0 23 0 7 93 8: 0 0 P M 13 16 1 0 0 0 26 0 5 0 6 0 4 1 0 0 24 0 7 103 9: 0 0 P M 13 16 0 0 0 0 38 0 5 0 6 0 4 1 0 0 24 0 7 114 10 : 0 0 P M 11 11 0 0 0 0 24 0 5 0 5 0 4 1 0 0 24 0 7 92 11 : 0 0 P M 11 4 0 0 0 0 10 0 5 0 4 0 3 1 0 0 24 0 9 71 12 : 0 0 A M 8 3 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 23 0 13 65 PA R K I N G S T U D Y Pr e p a r e d b y N a t i o n a l D a t a & S u r v e y i n g S e r v i c e s LO T 3 TI M E GR O U N D L E V E L B LE V E L 1 B LE V E L 2 B L E V E L 2 A TOTAL Lo c a t i o n : Pa r k i n g L o t s Day:Sunday Ci t y : An a h e i m Date:12/6/2015 LE V E L 0 2 L E V E L 0 3 L E V E L 0 4 L E V E L 0 5 L E V E L 0 6 HC R e g u l a r H C V a n p o o l Re g R e s e r v e d H C R e g H C R e s e r v e d V a n p o o l M o t o r c y c l e R e g R e g R e g R e g R e g Sp a c e s 3 2 5 Sp a c e s 4 4 2 1 6 7 8 1 99 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 4 6 1 3 7: 0 0 0 0 0 7: 0 0 25 1 5 4 6 0 0 27 2 9 33 8 4 20 5 8: 0 0 0 0 0 8: 0 0 25 1 5 4 6 0 0 27 2 9 33 8 4 20 5 9: 0 0 0 0 0 9: 0 0 23 1 5 6 4 0 0 27 2 9 33 8 4 20 3 10 : 0 0 3 1 4 10 : 0 0 25 1 6 6 7 0 0 27 2 9 33 8 4 20 9 11 : 0 0 3 2 5 11 : 0 0 44 2 1 6 6 8 0 99 1 1 1 9 4 3 3 8 4 50 6 12 : 0 0 3 2 5 12 : 0 0 44 2 1 6 5 8 0 99 1 1 1 1 0 9 4 7 8 4 53 4 13 : 0 0 3 2 5 13 : 0 0 44 2 1 5 7 8 0 98 1 1 1 1 0 8 4 9 8 4 53 5 14 : 0 0 2 0 2 14 : 0 0 24 1 9 6 7 8 0 28 3 1 4 3 3 5 8 4 28 5 15 : 0 0 0 0 0 15 : 0 0 19 9 6 7 8 0 21 2 15 3 5 8 4 20 6 16 : 0 0 0 0 0 16 : 0 0 19 1 0 6 7 7 0 22 2 13 3 5 8 4 20 5 17 : 0 0 0 0 0 17 : 0 0 22 6 6 7 8 0 22 2 13 3 5 8 4 20 5 18 : 0 0 0 0 0 18 : 0 0 21 1 1 6 7 8 0 18 3 12 3 5 8 4 20 5 19 : 0 0 0 0 0 19 : 0 0 21 1 2 6 7 8 0 18 3 12 3 5 8 4 20 6 20 : 0 0 0 0 0 20 : 0 0 21 1 2 6 7 8 0 18 3 12 1 2 8 4 18 3 21 : 0 0 0 0 0 21 : 0 0 25 1 3 6 7 8 0 25 3 12 1 2 8 4 19 5 22 : 0 0 0 0 0 22 : 0 0 25 1 3 6 7 8 0 23 3 12 1 2 8 4 19 3 GR O U N D LE V E L A LE V E L 1 A LEVEL 3B Em p l o y e e V i s i t o r H C E V R e s e r v e d 2 0 M i n u t e s M o t o r c y c l e R e g u l a r E m p l o y e e Re s e r v e d Ci t y P o o l c a r s On l y C i t y C a r p o o l Pa r k i n g O n l y Vi s i t o r R e g u l a r Re s e r v e d Pa r k i n g O n l y Vi s i t o r H C 20 M i n u t e s Pi c k U p Re g u l a r C i t y C a r p o o l R e g u l a r Sp a c e s 2 6 1 6 1 0 4 1 65 2 0 1 0 5 32 6 9 4 3 1 7 4 1 59 4 1 3 3 5 1 9 7: 0 0 8 3 0 1 0 0 21 0 6 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 32 0 22 99 8: 0 0 8 7 0 1 0 0 33 0 6 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 32 0 22 115 9: 0 0 11 1 1 0 1 0 0 65 1 2 4 0 24 2 2 4 2 0 0 34 0 23 213 10 : 0 0 26 1 6 3 1 0 0 65 2 0 1 0 5 32 6 9 2 5 6 1 0 38 0 22 339 11 : 0 0 26 1 6 3 2 0 0 65 2 0 1 0 5 32 6 9 4 3 1 7 2 0 53 4 1 1 5 482 12 : 0 0 26 1 6 1 0 3 0 0 65 2 0 1 0 5 32 6 9 4 3 1 7 3 0 58 4 1 2 9 510 13 : 0 0 20 1 6 5 3 0 0 65 2 0 1 0 5 32 6 9 4 1 1 7 3 0 59 4 1 3 1 500 14 : 0 0 20 1 2 4 3 0 0 56 1 4 6 4 23 3 2 1 6 6 0 0 32 1 35 264 15 : 0 0 16 9 2 2 0 0 25 0 6 0 6 3 7 5 0 0 33 0 23 137 16 : 0 0 16 9 2 2 0 0 30 0 6 0 6 2 7 5 0 0 33 0 23 141 17 : 0 0 13 1 0 0 2 0 0 37 0 6 0 4 1 5 2 0 0 32 0 20 132 18 : 0 0 12 1 1 0 1 0 0 33 0 6 0 4 1 4 1 0 0 32 0 18 123 19 : 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 0 30 0 7 0 3 1 5 2 0 0 32 0 18 117 20 : 0 0 8 11 0 0 0 0 30 0 7 0 3 1 5 2 0 0 32 0 18 117 21 : 0 0 10 6 0 1 0 0 20 0 7 0 2 1 3 2 0 0 32 0 18 102 22 : 0 0 10 6 0 0 0 0 17 0 7 0 2 1 3 2 0 0 32 0 18 98 Pr e p a r e d b y N a t i o n a l D a t a & S u r v e y i n g S e r v i c e s PA R K I N G S T U D Y TI M E TO T A L TI M E CI T Y H A L L P U B L I C P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TOTAL GR O U N D L E V E L B LE V E L 1 B AN A H E I M C I V I C CE N T E R P A R K I N G L O T LE V E L 2 B LEVEL 2A TI M E CE N T E R S T P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TO T A L LE V E L 0 1 Lo c a t i o n : Wi l l d a n L o t , C o m m u n i t y C e n t e r L o t & C a r P a r k 3 Day:Sunday Ci t y : An a h e i m Date:3/13/2016 Le v e l A Re g H C I l l e g a l R e g H C Ci t y V e h i c l e On l y Il l e g a l GA T E D R e g Pe r m i t Pa r k i n g IV P a r k i n g O v e r s i z e d M o t o r c y c l e H C R e g 2 H o u r s Pe r m i t Pa r k i n g Ca r p o o l H C O v e r s i z e d M o t o r c y c l e R e g E U P a r k i n g H C O v e r s i z e d R e g O v e r s i z e d H C R e g O v e r s i z e d Sp a c e s 3 7 6 43 1 0 1 1 2 1 8 13 1 G A T E D 3 2 1 5 2 1 1 6 4 3 3 1 6 2 8 3 8 1 1 9 8 5 4 2 1 0 2 3 4 1 0 7 8 4 9 3 6 6 7 7: 0 0 11 1 0 12 6 0 1 3 0 19 7 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 2 3 0 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 1 85 1 1 6 8: 0 0 23 3 0 26 17 0 1 3 0 30 7 1 1 3 0 0 0 2 4 9 6 9 0 1 2 3 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 1 100 1 5 6 9: 0 0 37 6 1 44 32 2 1 3 0 47 7 3 1 5 0 0 0 3 4 1 6 9 9 0 1 2 3 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 1 117 2 0 8 10 : 0 0 37 6 1 44 71 12 1 5 0 98 7 4 1 5 0 0 0 3 4 2 5 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 9 0 0 4 1 148 2 9 0 11 : 0 0 37 6 3 46 85 10 1 5 0 11 0 7 6 1 4 0 0 0 2 4 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 2 6 8 0 0 0 9 0 0 4 1 169 3 2 5 12 : 0 0 34 6 0 40 10 1 12 1 8 1 13 2 7 6 1 5 0 0 0 2 4 2 9 1 5 1 3 2 4 2 7 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 6 1 189 3 6 1 13 : 0 0 37 6 0 43 10 1 12 1 8 1 13 2 7 8 1 5 0 0 0 2 4 3 3 1 5 1 5 2 5 2 7 2 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 7 1 205 3 8 0 14 : 0 0 37 6 1 44 10 1 12 1 8 1 13 2 7 8 1 4 2 0 0 4 4 3 3 1 5 1 5 1 5 2 6 2 0 0 1 1 8 0 0 7 1 199 3 7 5 15 : 0 0 24 3 0 27 52 8 1 5 2 77 7 8 1 4 2 0 0 4 4 2 4 1 3 1 6 1 5 2 5 6 0 0 1 1 9 0 0 7 1 184 2 8 8 16 : 0 0 14 1 0 15 44 9 1 4 2 69 7 8 9 0 0 0 2 4 1 8 1 1 1 2 1 5 2 5 3 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 5 1 154 2 3 8 17 : 0 0 9 0 0 9 42 8 1 5 1 66 6 5 3 0 0 0 2 4 1 5 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 9 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 1 135 2 1 0 18 : 0 0 15 0 0 15 22 o 1 3 1 36 6 4 3 0 0 0 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 1 122 1 7 3 19 : 0 0 14 0 0 14 15 0 1 3 0 28 7 4 3 0 0 0 1 4 1 4 8 1 1 1 2 2 3 8 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 4 1 116 1 5 8 20 : 0 0 13 0 0 13 10 0 1 3 0 23 8 4 2 1 0 0 1 4 7 5 1 1 0 1 2 2 9 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 1 92 1 2 8 21 : 0 0 11 0 0 11 8 0 1 3 0 21 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 4 5 5 0 1 2 1 6 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 1 57 8 9 22 : 0 0 4 0 0 4 8 0 1 3 0 21 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 3 2 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 1 35 6 0 No t e s : Le v e l A w a s g a t e d a l l d a y Grand Total Pr e p a r e d b y N a t i o n a l D a t a & S u r v e y i n g S e r v i c e s PA R K I N G S T U D Y Le v e l 3 Le v e l 4 Level 5 Ca r P a r k 3 Sub Total Le v e l 1 Le v e l 2 Su b To t a l Ti m e Wi l l d a n L o t Su b To t a l Co m m u n i t y C e n t e r L o t A T T A C H M E N T N O . 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 ATT 6 ‐ Parking License Agreement ‐ River Church 101018 1 PARKING LICENSE AGREEMENT (RIVER ARENA) This Parking License Agreement (River Arena) (the “Parking Agreement”), dated for identification only as of October 1, 2018, is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation and charter city (the “City”), and RIVER CHURCH USA INCORPORATED, a California nonprofit corporation, doing business as the “River Church” (the “Licensee”). City and Licensee are individually referred to herein as a “Party” and jointly as the “Parties.” RECITALS A. City controls and operates four parking facilities in close proximity to the River Arena: “CarPark 1” located at 201 S. Philadelphia; “CarPark 2” located at 235 E. Center Street; “CarPark 3” located at 125 Center Street Promenade; and an outdoor parking lot located behind the building at 290 S. Anaheim Boulevard (the “Willdan Lot”). CarPark 1, CarPark 2, CarPark 3, and the Willdan Lot are hereinafter referred to individually as a “Parking Facility” and collectively as the “Parking Facilities.” The Parking Facilities are identified on the Map attached hereto as Exhibit A. The “Community Center Lot” is identified on the Map for information purposes only and such lot is not a Parking Facility for purposes of this Parking Agreement. B. Licensee is the occupant of real property located at 201 E. Broadway in the City of Anaheim, California and commonly known as the “River Arena.” The River Arena is identified as the “Project Site” on the Map attached hereto as Exhibit A. Licensee is affiliated with the owner of the River Arena, Favorday, a California non‐profit corporation. The River Arena includes a 2,500 seat theater along with ancillary offices, meeting rooms and amenities but no on‐site parking. Licensee desires to obtain the non‐exclusive right to utilize the Parking Facilities (as defined below) for off‐site parking on a non‐exclusive basis and on such terms and conditions as provided in this Parking Agreement. C. On October 6, 2003, pursuant to Resolution No. PC2003‐136, the City’s Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2003‐04762 to allow a church use at 201 E. Broadway in conjunction with the theater pursuant to several conditions of approval, including, but not limited to an agreement between the City and the applicant pertaining to use of the City‐owned parking structures. D. Licensee applied to the City for a conditional use permit, identified as Conditional Use Permit No. 2015‐05840 (“CUP No. 2015‐05840”). CUP No. 2015‐05840 was approved by the City’s Planning Commission on _____________, 2018 pursuant to Resolution No. PC2018‐___. ATTACHMENT NO. 6 2 E. In connection with the Planning Commission’s consideration of CUP No. 2015‐05840, the Planning Commission will also consider certain “conditions of approval” which include conditions relating to this Parking Agreement along with certain traffic control and parking conditions. F. The City and Licensee desire to set forth the terms and conditions by which Licensee may utilize the Parking Facilities (as defined below) to provide parking for Arena Visitors. NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Definitions. “Adjustment Date” refers to the date during the Initial Term on which the License Fee is adjusted to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index pursuant to Section 4.2 below. “Arena Visitors” means, collectively, Licensee and Licensee’s congregation members, employees, volunteers, contractors, guests, invitees, and any person visiting the River Arena. “Bookstore” means the bookstore within the River Arena and operated concurrent with other activities at the River Arena. “CarPark 1” refers to the parking facility located at 201 S. Philadelphia. “CarPark 2” refers to the parking facility located at 235 E. Center Street. “CarPark 3” refers to the parking facility located at 125 Center Street Promenade. “City” means the City of Anaheim, a municipal corporation and charter city. “Commencement Date” is defined in Section 3.2. “Conditions of Approval” refer to the conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission for CUP No. 2015‐05840. “CUP No. 2015‐05840” means the Conditional Use Permit approved by the Anaheim Planning Commission on ___________, 2018 pursuant to Resolution No. PC2018‐___. “Director” means the Director of the City of Anaheim’s Community and Economic Development Department. “Effective Date” means the date on which the Parking Agreement is signed by both Parties after the Planning Commission’s approval of CUP No. 2015‐05840 and the City Council’s approval of this Parking Agreement. The Effective Date may precede the Commencement Date. 3 “Emergency Prayer/Counseling” means the Licensee’s program providing on‐site, 24‐ hour, Monday through Sunday, emergency prayer and counseling services. “Extension Negotiation Period” means the period during which the Parties may negotiate a new License Fee pursuant to Section 3.3 below as a result of Licensee’s exercise of its option to extend the term of this Parking Agreement. “Extension Term” refers to one of the five‐year terms which may be added to the Initial Term at the option of Licensee pursuant to Section 3.3 below. “Index” means the Consumer Price Index – Los Angeles‐Anaheim‐Riverside – All Urban Consumers – All Items (1982‐1984=100), as published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Initial Term” means the term of this Parking Agreement which begins on the Commencement Date and continues for ten years from the Commencement Date. “License” means the license granted by the City to River Church USA Incorporated and Arena Visitors pursuant to Section 2 below. “Licensee” means River Church USA Incorporated, a California nonprofit corporation, doing business as the “River Church.” “License Fee” means the fee to be paid by Licensee to the City for the use of the Parking Facilities as set forth in Section 4 below. “License Term” means the time during which the License is in effect, which includes the Initial Term, any Extension Term, and any renewal or holdover thereof. “Multipurpose Room‐Sound Stage” means the use of the multipurpose room within the River Arena as a sound stage and set for a television talk show. “Friday Evening Events” means group meetings, bible study, drama classes, choir practice, and other church related events occurring in the lobby, classrooms, and/or the theatre on Fridays between 6 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. “Option Notice” means a notice delivered to the City by Licensee to exercise an option to extend the License Term pursuant to Section 3.3 below. “Parking Agreement” means this agreement between the City and Licensee. “Parking Facilities” means “CarPark 1” located at 201 S. Philadelphia; “CarPark 2” located at 235 E. Center Street; “CarPark 3” located at 125 Center Street Promenade; and an outdoor parking lot located behind the building at 290 S. Anaheim Boulevard 4 (the “Willdan Lot”). A reference to a “Parking Facility” is a reference to one of the Parking Facilities. “Parking Operator” means the third‐party vendor selected by City to operate and maintain the Parking Facilities. As of the Commencement Date, SP Plus Corporation, doing business as Central Parking serves as the Parking Operator. “River Arena” means all physical improvements on property located at 201 E. Broadway, Anaheim, including a 2,500 seat theater with ancillary offices, meeting rooms, and amenities. “River Café” means the approximate 3,287 square foot café within the River Arena. “Saturday Activities” mean activities at the River Arena occurring on Saturdays consistent with the mission of Licensee, including group meetings, prayer meetings, drama classes, choir practice, bible study, and other church related activities. “Special Event” refers to activities conducted at the River Arena which require a written request to the City and/or issuance of a Special Use Permit by the City of Anaheim, as set forth in CUP No. 2015‐05840. “Sunday Services” means church services and assemblies within the theatre at the River Arena occurring on Sundays, along with ancillary uses of the River Arena by Arena Visitors. “Willdan Lot” refers to the outdoor parking lot located behind the building at 290 S. Anaheim Boulevard. 2. Grant of License Subject to and upon the terms, provisions and conditions hereinafter set forth in this Parking Agreement, and in consideration of the duties, covenants and obligations of the Licensee hereunder, City hereby grants to Licensee for the benefit of Licensee and Arena Visitors a non‐exclusive license, in common with other authorized users, to enter the Parking Facilities solely for the purpose of vehicular parking for Licensee and Arena Visitors, together with a non‐exclusive license necessary for Licensee and Arena Visitors to gain vehicular and pedestrian access to and from the Parking Facilities (the “License”) and for no other purposes without the prior written approval of City. 3. Term and Termination 3.1. Effective Date. This Parking Agreement shall become effective and bind the Parties on the date that it is signed by the Parties after the Planning Commission’s approval of CUP No. 2015‐05840 and the City Council’s approval of this Parking 5 Agreement. The Effective Date may precede the Commencement Date described in Section 3.2 below. 3.2. License Term; Commencement Date. The term of this License (the “License Term”) shall commence on the first day of the month following both: (i) the expiration of the statute of limitations for challenging the Planning Commission’s approval (or, in the case of an appeal, the City Council’s approval) of CUP No. 2015‐05840; and (ii) the approval of this Parking Agreement by the City Council, unless the last of those dates takes place on the first day of the month, in which case the License Term shall commence on that first day of the month (the “Commencement Date”). The initial term of the License Term shall be for a period of ten (10) years from the Commencement Date (the “Initial Term”), unless sooner terminated or extended pursuant to the terms hereof. Except as otherwise specifically stated in this License, references to the “License Term” shall include the Initial Term and any extension, renewal or holdover thereof. A “License Year” is a period of twelve (12) consecutive calendar months commencing on the Commencement Date and annually thereafter during the License Term. 3.3. Option to Extend License Term; License Fee Determination. Licensee shall have two (2) option(s) to extend the License Term for a period of five (5) years each (each an “Extension Term”), provided that at the time of such election and at the expiration of such existing term Licensee is not then in an uncured default under any of the terms of provisions of the Parking Agreement. Licensee shall exercise each option by giving written notice of Licensee’s intent to exercise its option to City at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the expiration of the then current License Term (an “Option Notice”). The Parties shall have ninety (90) days after City receives the Option Notice in which to agree on the License Fee to be paid by Licensee during the Extension Term (the “Extension Negotiation Period”). If the Licensee and the City, acting through its Director, agree on the License Fee for the Extension Term during the Extension Negotiation Period, and provided that the agreed on License Fee is not less than the then existing License Fee, the Director and Licensee shall immediately execute a “Memorandum Confirming License Fee for Extension Term” reflecting the agreed upon License Fee. If the Licensee and the Director tentatively agree on a License Fee for the Extension Term that is less than the then current License Fee, such reduced License Fee shall be subject to approval by the City Council which may approve, disapprove, or otherwise set the License Fee for the Extension Term in its sole and absolute discretion. If the Licensee and Director are unable to agree on the License Fee for the Extension Term within the Extension Negotiation Period, then within ten (10) days after the expiration of the Extension Negotiation Period, Licensee may request the Director to submit to the City Council the consideration and final determination of the License Fee for the Extension Term. The Director shall timely submit that request to the City Council and reasonably identify the Parties’ differences. The City Council shall, acting in is sole 6 and absolute discretion, shall thereafter determine the License Fee to be proposed to Licensee. If Licensee accepts the City Council’s proposed License Fee, (i) that License Fee shall become the License Fee for the Extension Term and (ii) the Director and Licensee shall immediately execute a “Memorandum Confirming License Fee for Extension Term” reflecting that License Fee. If Licensee does not agree to the License Fee proposed by the City Council, the License shall expire at the end of the then current License Term. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Parking Agreement, if Licensee timely delivers an Option Notice to the City, but Licensee and the City do not reach agreement on the License Fee for the Extension Term during the Extension Negotiation Period, the then current License Term shall not expire until the later of (i) the date otherwise established by this Parking Agreement or (ii) sixty days after the City Council makes its License Fee Determination. 3.4. Termination. (a) The City, acting through the Director, shall have the right to: (i) immediately terminate the License and all other rights granted to Licensee herein in the event that Licensee suffers an Event of Default (as such term is hereinafter defined in Section 13), subject to the cure provisions of Section 13.1 and/or (ii) immediately terminate the License and all other rights granted to Licensee herein in the event that CUP No. 2015‐05840 is revoked or terminated. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon receipt of the Director’s notice of termination as provided in this Section 3.4(a), Licensee shall have the right to appeal the Director’s determination directly to the City Council. While that appeal is pending, this License shall remain in effect. (b) The City, acting through the City Council, shall have the right to terminate the License and all other rights granted to Licensee herein, without cause and in City Council’s sole and absolute discretion, upon giving Licensee, no earlier than one year after the Commencement Date, not less than 360 days’ advance written notice of City’s intention to terminate this License Agreement (c) Nothing in this Agreement, including the provisions of Section 3.4, is intended to be a waiver of any claims or defenses otherwise available to either Party under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000. 4. License Fee; Parking Charges in Arrears. 4.1. License Fee. From and after the Commencement Date, Licensee shall pay to City during the License Term, a monthly License Fee of $7,000 (the “License Fee”), provided, however, that such License Fee shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2. The first License Fee payment shall be delivered no later than three (3) days 7 following the Commencement Date. All subsequent License Fees to be paid by Licensee to City shall be paid in advance on the first day of each calendar month. License Fee payments shall be made payable to the City of Anaheim and delivered to: City of Anaheim c/o Department of Community and Economic Development Attention: Fiscal Manager 201 S. Anaheim Blvd., 10th Floor Anaheim, CA 92805 4.2. Adjustment of License Fee. The License Fee set forth in Section 4.1 shall be adjusted on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Commencement Date (that is, the beginning of License Year 6 of the License Term) (the “Adjustment Date”). The License Fee will be adjusted to reflect the percentage increase, if any (but not any decrease) in the Index from the final Index published before the Commencement Date through the final Index published before the Adjustment Date. City shall notify Licensee of the adjustment to the License Fee, in writing, as soon as reasonably possible. Licensee acknowledges that the amount of such increase and written notice thereof may not be available until sometime after the Adjustment Date. Therefore, Licensee shall continue to make monthly License Fee payments to City of the License Fee in the amount of $7,000 until written notice of the newly calculated License Fee is received by Licensee. No later than ten (10) days following receipt by Licensee of such written notice, Licensee shall pay to City the amount of the increase reflected in such written notice for each calendar month from the Adjustment Date to the date of receipt by Licensee of such written notice. 4.3. Payment of Unpaid Parking Charges in Arrears; Resolution. Beginning on the Commencement Date, Licensee shall pay to City, in addition to and at the time of payment of the monthly License Fee as provided in Section 4.1, the sum of $119,000 (the “Unpaid Parking Charge Amount”) in monthly installments of $4,666.66 until the Unpaid Parking Charge Amount is fully paid. For each month beginning October 1, 2018 until the Commencement Date, the balance due to the City from Licensee of the Unpaid Parking Charge shall be increased by $7,000. Payment of the Unpaid Parking Charge Amount (including any additional amounts accruing on and after October 1, 2018), shall constitute full and complete satisfaction of all unpaid parking charges and fees due and owing to the City or its agencies, related to the Licensee’s use (or use by Arena Visitors) of the Parking Facilities occurring prior to the Commencement Date. 5. Parking Usage and Allocation of Parking Spaces. 5.1. Employees/Administrative Personnel Parking. In addition to any other parking provided in this Section 5, Licensee shall have the right to use up to 10 parking spaces in CarPark 1, Monday through Sunday, for use by Licensee’s employees/administrative personnel. 8 5.2. Friday Evening Events. Licensee shall have the right to use up to 200 parking spaces on Fridays, from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., in CarPark 1 and CarPark 2, for use by Arena Visitors attending Friday Evening Events. 5.3. Saturday Activities. (a) Licensee shall have the right to use up to 100 parking spaces on Saturdays, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., in CarPark 1 and CarPark 2, for use by Arena Visitors attending Saturday Activities. (b) Arena Visitors attending Saturday Activities from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. may elect to use Parking Facilities as provided in Section 5.5. 5.4. Sunday Services. Licensee shall have the right to use up to 753 parking spaces on Sundays from 7:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. for use by Arena Visitors attending religious services at the River Arena for Sunday Services. (a) Priority of Parking Facilities for Sunday Services. The parking spaces for Sunday Services are provided in the following prioritized order: (1) Subject to Section 6.2 and to the extent available, an Arena Visitor with: (i) a valid disabled person placard or plate issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles; or (ii) oversized vehicles, shall have first priority parking in the Willdan Lot; (2) 450 parking spaces in CarPark 1, accessed from the east entrance; (3) the balance of the parking spaces necessary to accommodate the Licensee’s 753 space Sunday parking requirements to be provided on the second, third, fourth, and fifth floors of CarPark 2; (4) to the extent that Licensee’s Sunday parking requirements are not accommodated as provided in (a) through (c) above, the balance of the parking spaces necessary to accommodate the Licensee’s Sunday parking requirements shall be provided in the licensed area of CarPark 3. (b) Time Between Services. To allow for efficient parking management, the time between Sunday services shall be no less than 90 minutes. In the event that the use of one or more of the Priority Facilities by the general public on a Sunday results in fewer parking spaces being available to Arena Visitors than are allocated by this Section 5.4, the City shall provide parking spaces in one or more other City‐owned parking facilities within reasonable walking distance to the River Arena. 9 5.5. First‐Come/First‐Served Parking. For the following activities, Arena Visitors may park in Parking Facilities on a first‐come/first‐served basis on the same terms, conditions, and parking charges as imposed on other public patrons utilizing those Parking Facilities: (a) Saturday Activities from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; (b) Emergency Prayer/Counseling; (c) Patronizing the Bookstore; (d) Patronizing the River Café; and (e) Participating in Multipurpose Room‐Sound Stage activities, small group, youth, and prayer meetings, and incidental church activities. 6. Special Event; Relocation; Unavailability; General Administration. 6.1. Parking Related to Special Events. In conjunction with a written request for a Special Event, Licensee may request the use of one or more of the Parking Facilities for parking and City may grant, conditionally grant, or deny such request acting in its sole and absolute discretion. Parking for a a Special Event must be requested by Licensee a minimum of thirty (30) days in advance. If less than 30 days’ advance notice is given by Licensee, City may, but shall not be obligated to, consider Licensee’s request. Licensee will be charged an additional per vehicle fee at a rate to be determined by City acting in its sole and absolute discretion, provided that such charge shall in no event exceed the average maximum daily posted parking rate at the City’s gated parking facilities in the Center Street Promenade area. 6.2. Existing License to Use Willdan Lot/Permanent Relocation of Willdan Lot Parking Spaces. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that its use of the Willdan lot is subordinate and subject to that certain MOU and License Agreement for Office and Program Space for the Chrysalis Employment Program dated as of July 19, 2018 (the “MOU”) such that the City may restrict Licensee’s use of the Willdan Lot to the extent necessary to ensure the MOU’s “licensee” has adequate parking as provided in the MOU. In addition, Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the City contemplates that the Willdan Lot may be conveyed and/or developed for another use during the License Term and Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the Willdan Lot will thereafter no longer be available as a Parking Facility for purposes of this Parking Agreement. In the event that the Willdan Lot is no longer available as a Parking Facility, the City shall reallocate the displaced parking spaces to other Parking Facilities, with priority to CarPark 2 and then, in second priority, to CarPark 3. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that because CarPark 2 and CarPark 3 are parking garages, the City makes no warranty or representation that the re‐allocated parking spaces will be able to accommodate 10 oversized vehicles or that CarPark 2 and/or CarPark 3 will have an equivalent number of replacement disabled parking spaces. 6.3. Planned Temporary Reallocation. The City contemplates that parking spaces within CarPark 1 or CarPark 2 may occasionally be needed in connection with a non‐ Licensee sponsored event in or around Anaheim City Hall that may result in the temporary non‐availability of the maximum number of parking spaces as provided in Sections 5.2, 5.3 and/or 5.4. In the event that the City determines to provide parking for such non‐Licensee sponsored weekend events within CarPark 1 or CarPark 2, such that the maximum number of parking spaces as provided in Sections 5.2, 5.3 and/or 5.4 are not available, the City shall reallocate the displaced parking spaces, giving priority first to any unaffected Priority Facility, then to the third floor CarPark 3 and, lastly to one or more other City‐owned parking facilities within reasonable walking distance to the River Arena. City shall provide not less than 30 days’ advance written notice of any reallocation. 6.4. Unavailability of a Parking Facility. (a) Temporary Unavailability. If the City requires the closure of any portion of a Priority Parking Facility on a temporary basis in order to (a) address an emergency or other unforeseen event, (b) perform its obligations under this License, or (c) to repair and maintain such Priority Parking Facility so that Licensee is unable to fully use, in a commercially reasonable manner, the License granted to Licensee, City shall (i) provide Licensee with as much prior notice as is practical under the circumstances, but, except in case of emergency, at least 24 hours, (ii) use commercially reasonable efforts to complete its work as expeditiously as reasonably possible and to restore Licensee’s use of the affected Priority Parking Facility, and (iii) City will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide substitute parking spaces in other Parking Facilities (any such substitute or alternate space shall hereinafter be called a “Substitute Space”). To the extent parking spaces within a Priority Parking Facility are not available for the reasons described in this Section 6.4(a), then the License Fee shall abate with respect to any such unavailable parking spaces on a pro rata basis; provided, however, that to the extent City provides Licensee with Substitute Spaces, then the License Fee shall not abate. This Section 6.4(a) does not apply to closure resulting from damage caused by fire or other casualty as set forth in Section 6.4(b). (b) Damage and Destruction. If a material portion of a Priority Parking Facility is damaged or destroyed by fire or any other identifiable event of a sudden, unexpected or unusual nature and the City fails to repair the portion of the Priority Parking Facility so damaged or destroyed within 11 thirty (30) days following such damage or destruction, or if such damage cannot be reasonably be substantially repaired within thirty (30) days following the date of such damage or destruction, then Licensee shall have the right thereafter to terminate this License. 6.5. Ungated Parking Facilities; Future Access following Gating. CarPark 1 and CarPark 2 are currently ungated parking structures that serve both members of the general public at no charge and commercial tenants/licensees utilizing parking spaces on a fee basis. In the event that City elects, in its sole discretion, to install gates and/or otherwise restrict access to CarPark 1 and/or CarPark 2, City shall provide Licensee with sufficient validations, access codes, or keys in order to reasonably accommodate the Permitted Licensee’s use of CarPark 1 and/or CarPark 2. The License granted for CarPark 1 and CarPark 2 shall be for use of unreserved parking spaces (that is, parking spaces that are available to the general public). Once gated, only the parking spaces accessed by way of such gate(s) at CarPark 1 and/or CarPark 2 shall be licensed for use to Licensee and Arena Visitors. 6.6. Access to Existing Gated Parking Facility (CarPark 3). The licensed area of CarPark 3 is accessed and exited by way of an automated gate system. If CarPark 3 is to be used pursuant to this License, City shall provide Licensee with sufficient validations, access codes, or keys in order to reasonably accommodate the use of CarPark 3 in the event that there are insufficient parking spaces in CarPark 1, CarPark 2, and the Willdan Lot. Only the parking spaces above Level 3 accessed by way of the gate for CarPark 3 are licensed for use to Licensee and Arena Visitors. 6.7. Use of City’s Parking Operator. Licensee shall enter into a contract to utilize City’s Parking Operator to provide parking management services on Sundays and for all Special Events. Licensee shall contract with the Anaheim Police Department to provide traffic control services on Sundays and for Special Events if so required by the Anaheim Police Department. In no event shall Licensee, the Parking Operator, the City, or any other persons collect an entry or exit fee from Arena Visitors for parking at a Parking Facility, except as (1) provided in Section 5.5 for first‐come/first‐served parking, or (2) agreed to in advance and in writing by the Parties in the case of a Special Event. 6.8. Parking Rules. Use of the Parking Facilities is conditioned on Licensee and Arena Visitors’ abiding by all posted parking rules and regulations prescribed from time to time and for the orderly operation and use of the Parking Facilities. Licensee shall use reasonable efforts to ensure that Arena Visitors comply with such rules and regulations, including restrictions placed on parking in spaces designated as: (i) reserved for persons with disabilities, (ii) reserved for City personnel or otherwise marked as “reserved” for employees of a designated business entity; or (iii) reserved for carpool vehicles. 6.9. Compliance with CUP. Use of the Parking Facilities is conditioned on Licensee’s compliance with CUP No. 2015‐05840 and the Conditions of Approval thereto. 12 6.10. Prohibition from Interfering with Parking Use by Non‐Arena Visitors. Licensee is prohibited from restricting or attempting to restrict access to, and use of, a Parking Facility by persons that are not Arena Visitors. Examples of such prohibited interference includes, but are not limited to, the posting of signs indicating that parking within a Parking Facility is “only” for or limited to Arena Visitors. 7. Condition and Maintenance of the Parking Facilities. 7.1. Condition of the Parking Facilities. Licensee acknowledges that Licensee has examined the condition of the Parking Facilities and agrees to use the Parking Facilities in an “AS IS” condition, with no warranty or representation by City as to the physical condition of the Parking Facilities or any security provided thereon. All persons entering the Parking Facilities under this Parking Agreement do so at their own risk. 7.2. Maintenance of the Parking Facilities. City shall maintain the Parking Facilities in a clean, orderly, well‐maintained, and lighted condition, consistent with the condition of similar parking structures in Downtown Anaheim. 7.3. Security Measures. Licensee acknowledges that City makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the security of the Parking Facilities or the need for, or propriety of, any security measures at the Parking Facilities. Licensee further acknowledges that City shall have no obligation whatsoever to provide guard service or any other security measures. Licensee expressly assumes all responsibility for the protection and security of Licensee, Arena Visitors, and their respective property within the Parking Facilities from any and all acts of any third party during Licensee’s designated hours of use. Licensee shall have the option, but not the obligation, to provide onsite security services in the Parking Facilities during the times of their use by Arena Visitors provided that such onsite security service coordinates with the City’s Parking Operator and the City’s then existing security service along with providing the City with proof on insurance and a written indemnification in favor of the City consistent with provisions of Sections 11 and 12, respectively, in such form as approved by the City Attorney. 8. Signage and FF&E. Licensee shall not (i) make any changes, alterations, improvements or additions to the Parking Facilities, or (ii) place any furniture, fixtures, and equipment (collectively, the “FF&E”) in or on the Parking Facilities unless approved in advance by the City, which approval shall be granted, withheld, or conditioned in City’s sole and absolute discretion. Licensee may request permission for Licensee created signage to be erected in conjunction with a Special Event, which request City may grant, conditionally grant, or deny acting in its sole and absolute discretion. In the event that City grants a request, such signage shall be erected, installed and removed immediately at the conclusion of the Special Event, by the City’s Parking Operator, at the expense of Licensee. 13 During the License Term and thereafter, Licensee shall have no ownership interest in the Parking Facilities or any changes, alterations, improvements, and additions thereto. All FF&E that are made, constructed or placed in or on the Parking Facilities by the City, and all changes, alterations, improvements, and additions thereto, shall be owned by and be considered the property of City. Upon termination of the Parking Agreement, Licensee shall have no ownership interest in any of the FF&E (if any) in or on the Parking Facilities. 9. Taxes. City shall be solely responsible for the payment of any and all real property taxes, impositions, or similar charges levied against the Parking Facilities, excluding, however, any possessory interest taxes relating to Licensee’s use of the Parking Facilities. If Licensee’s rights under this Parking Agreement create a possessory interest of Licensee in and to one or more Parking Facility, then such possessory interest may be subject to property taxation. In the event of such taxation, Licensee, not City, shall be responsible for the payment of such taxes. Licensee acknowledges that this Section shall constitute disclosure of the possibility of the taxation of Licensee’s interest, as said notice is contemplated by Section 107.6 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of State of California. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no property rights in the Parking Facilities, or right of possession thereof, is granted by this Parking Agreement. 10. Assignment and Subletting. The License granted by this Parking Agreement is personal to Licensee and any assignment of this Parking Agreement by Licensee, voluntarily or by operation of law, shall be considered a default under this Parking Agreement, unless Licensee has obtained the prior written consent of City. The City’s consent shall not be unreasonably withheld by City if the assignee’s use of the River Arena is within the permitted scope of CUP No. 2015‐05840. Otherwise, City’s consent may be withheld in City’s sole and absolute discretion. 11. Indemnities. Irrespective of any insurance carried by Licensee for the benefit of City, and notwithstanding any other provision of this Parking Agreement to the contrary, Licensee shall defend, indemnify, assume all responsibility for, and hold the City, its officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to herein with City as the “Indemnified Parties”), harmless from, all claims, demands, damages, defense costs or liability of any kind or nature (including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs) relating to Licensee or Arena Visitor's use of the Parking Facilities or the implementation of this Parking Agreement for or any damages to property or injuries to persons, including accidental death, which may be caused by any of the Licensee’s activities under this Parking Agreement, whether such activities or performance thereof be (i) by the Licensee, or (ii) by Arena Visitors or agents, and whether such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Parking Agreement. The Licensee shall not be liable for that portion of such claims from property damage or bodily injury occasioned by the 14 sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties or by City’s failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this Parking Agreement. Notwithstanding the City’s agreement to enter into this Parking Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or be responsible for making a determination regarding whether or not the Parking Facilities or the use of the Parking Facilities by the Licensee is permitted under the ADA. Licensee agrees to indemnify, defend (at City’s option) and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any and all claims, demands, defense costs, liability expense, or damages of any kind or nature arising out of or in connection with an allegation from Licensee or Arena Visitors that the Parking Facilities violate the ADA. 12. Insurance. Without limiting the City’s right to indemnification, it is agreed that Licensee shall secure prior to commencing any activities under this Parking Agreement, and maintain during the Term, insurance coverage as follows: (a) Workers’ Compensation Insurance to the extent required of Licensee by California statutes and Employee’s Liability Coverage in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000); (b) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, or Commercial General Liability Insurance, including coverage for Contractual Liability, Personal Injury Liability, Products/Completed Operations Liability, Broad‐Form Property Damage and Independent Contractor’s Liability, in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, combined single limit, written on an occurrence form; and (c) Comprehensive Automobile Liability coverage, including ‐ as applicable ‐ owned, non‐owned and hired autos, in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, combined single limit, written on an occurrence form. The Director, with the consent of the City’s Risk Manager, is hereby authorized to reduce or waive the requirements set forth above in the event the Director determines that such reduction or waiver is in City’s best interest. Each insurance policy shall contain the following provision or its equivalent: This insurance shall not be canceled, materially limited in scope or coverage, or non‐renewed until after thirty 30 days’ prior written notice has been given to the City Clerk of the City of Anaheim at 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. 15 Each insurance policy, excepting policies for workers’ compensation, shall contain the two (2) following provisions or their equivalents: It is agreed that any insurance or self‐insurance maintained by the City of Anaheim shall apply in excess of and not contribute with insurance provided by this policy. The City of Anaheim and its officials, agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers are added as additional insureds as respects operations and activities of, or on behalf of the named insured, performed under contract with the City of Anaheim. Prior to the Effective Date, Licensee shall deliver to City (i) insurance certificates confirming the existence of the insurance required by this Parking Agreement, and including the applicable clauses referenced above, and (ii) endorsements to the above‐required policies, which add to these policies the applicable clauses referenced above. Such endorsements shall be signed by an authorized representative of the insurance company and shall include the signatory’s company affiliation and title. Should it be deemed necessary by the City, it shall be the Licensee’s responsibility to see that the City receives documentation, acceptable to the City, which sustains that the individual signing such endorsements is indeed authorized to do so by the insurance company. Also, the City has the right to reasonably request that Licensee provide City copies of any insurance policies required under this Parking Agreement, which request shall be reasonably honored by Licensee within a reasonable time. In addition to any other remedies the City may have if the Licensee fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, the City may, at its sole option: (i) Obtain such insurance and bill Licensee the amount of the premium paid by City for such insurance. Licensee agrees to pay any such bill within three business days upon receipt of a bill, or; (ii) Terminate this Parking Agreement, if such failure continues for 10 business days following City’s notice of the same to Licensee. Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies the City may have and is not the exclusive remedy for the Licensee’s failure to maintain insurance or secure appropriate endorsements. The requirements of this Section shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the Licensee may be held responsible for payment of damages to persons or property resulting from the Licensee’s use of the Parking Facilities or Licensee’s obligations under this Parking Agreement. 16 13. Defaults. 13.1. Events of Default of Licensee. The failure by Licensee to observe or perform any of the covenants or provisions of this Parking Agreement to be observed or performed by Licensee shall constitute an Event of Default hereunder, where such failure shall continue for a period of five days after written notice thereof is received by Licensee from City; provided, however, that it shall not be deemed an Event by Default by Licensee if Licensee shall commence to cure such failure within such five (5) day period and thereafter diligently prosecute such cure to completion. 13.2. City’s Remedies. Subject to Section 3.4(a) above, if there occurs an Event of Default by Licensee, in addition to any other remedies available to City at law or in equity, City shall have the option to terminate this Parking Agreement and all rights of Licensee hereunder. 13.3. Licensee’s Remedies. If there occurs an Event of Default by City, in addition to any other remedies available to Licensee at law or in equity, Licensee shall have the option to terminate this Parking Agreement and all rights of City hereunder. 14. Notices. All notices hereunder must be in writing and, unless otherwise provided herein, shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, overnight courier or telecopy and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of (i) if mailed, five days after the date of posting by the United States post office, or (ii) if sent by personal delivery or overnight courier, upon receipt by the person to receive such notice. Notices shall be addressed as follows (or to any other mailing address which the Party to be notified may designate to the other Party by such notice; should City or Licensee have a change of address, the other Party shall immediately be notified as provided in this Section 14 of such change): To City: City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Attention: City Clerk With copies to: City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Attention: City Attorney and City of Anaheim 201 S. Anaheim Boulevard Suite 1003 17 Anaheim, California 92805 Attention: Director of Community and Economic Development To Licensee: River Church USA Incorporated 12437 Lewis Street, Suite 102 Garden Grove, CA 92840 Attention: Daniel Darling, Executive Pastor With copies to: Tim Paone Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92612 15. Miscellaneous Provisions. 15.1. Attorney’s Fees. City and Licensee agree that in the event of litigation to enforce this Parking Agreement or terms, provisions and conditions contained herein, to terminate this Parking Agreement, or to collect damages for a default hereunder, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred in connection with such litigation. 15.2. Nondiscrimination. Licensee agrees not to discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of sex, color, race, creed, religion, marital status, handicap, ancestry, or national origin in its activities hereunder. To the extent this Parking Agreement provides that Licensee offer accommodations or services to the public, such accommodations or services shall be offered by Licensee to the public on fair and reasonable terms. 15.3. Waiver. Inaction by City or Licensee with respect to a default hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such default. The waiver by either City or Licensee of any default hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. 15.4. Time of the Essence. Time is hereby expressly declared to be the essence of this Parking Agreement and of each and every term, covenant and condition hereof which relates to a date or a period of time. 15.5. Relationship of Parties. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed by the Parties, nor by any third party, as creating the relationship of principal and agent, City and tenant, partnership or joint venture between the Parties. 15.6. Remedies Cumulative. The remedies given to City and Licensee herein shall be cumulative and are given without impairing any other rights given City or Licensee by statute or law now existing or hereafter enacted and the exercise of any one (1) remedy 18 by City or Licensee shall not exclude the exercise of any other remedy. Nothing in this Parking Agreement is intended nor does it constitute a relinquishment or waiver of a Party’s rights to seek judicial redress under State or federal law. 15.7. Effect of Invalidity. If any term or provision of this Parking Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Parking Agreement, or the application of its terms and provisions to persons and circumstances other than those to which it has been held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Parking Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 15.8. Successors and Assigns. This Parking Agreement and the covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and shall apply to the successors and assigns of City and to the permitted successors and assigns of Licensee, and all references to City or Licensee shall be deemed to refer to and include all permitted successors and assigns of such Party. 15.9. Entire Agreement. This Parking Agreement, including Exhibit A, contains the entire agreement of City and the Licensee with respect to the matters covered hereby, and no agreement, statement or promise made by either City or Licensee which is not contained herein, shall be valid or binding. No provision of this Parking Agreement may be amended, modified, or added except by an agreement in writing signed by City and Licensee. 15.10. Authority. Each individual of City and Licensee affixing his or her signature to this Parking Agreement represents and warrants by such signature that he or she has full legal authority to bind his or her respective party to all of the terms, conditions and provisions of this Parking Agreement, that his or her respective party has the full legal right, power, capacity and authority to enter into this this Parking Agreement and perform all of its provisions and obligations, and that no other approvals or consents are necessary in connection therewith. Licensee shall, at City’s request, deliver a certified copy of its governing board’s resolution or certificate authorizing such execution. 15.11. Conflicts of Interest. No member, official or employee of City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Parking Agreement, nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to this Parking Agreement which affect his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested. 15.12. No Personal Liability No member, official, employee or agent of City shall be personally liable to Licensee, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Licensee or Licensee’s successors, or on any obligation under the terms of this Parking Agreement. Likewise, no 19 member, official, employee or agent of Licensee shall be personally liable to City, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by Licensee or for any amount which may become due to City or City’s successors, or on any obligation under the terms of this Parking Agreement. 15.13. Controlling Law; Venue. This Parking Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Parties consent to the jurisdiction of the California courts with venue in Orange County. 15.14. Captions. The captions set forth herein are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the interpretation of this Parking Agreement or limit or amplify any of its terms or provisions. All references to “days” in this Parking Agreement shall be construed to mean calendar days unless otherwise expressly provided and all references to “business days” shall be construed to mean days on which national banks are open for business. 15.15. No Obligation to Third Parties. Execution and issuance of this Parking Agreement shall not be deemed to confer any rights upon, directly, indirectly or by way of subrogation, nor obligate either of the parties hereto to, any person or entity other than City and Licensee. 15.16. City Approvals and Actions through Director. The Director shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to this Parking Agreement. Whenever a reference is made herein to an action or approval to be undertaken by the City, the Director is authorized to act, unless this Parking Agreement specifically provides otherwise or the context should otherwise require. The Director shall have the authority to issue interpretations, waive provisions, and/or enter into certain amendments of this Parking Agreement on behalf of City so long as such actions do not materially or substantively change the uses of the Parking Facilities permitted under this Parking Agreement or cause the City to incur costs. 15.17. Counterparts. This Parking Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which counterparts taken together shall be deemed to be but one original. Signature pages may be separated from counterparts and attached to a copy of this Parking Agreement in order to form a single physical document containing the signatures of both Parties. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signatures on next page.] 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY AND LICENSEE HAVE EXECUTED THIS PARKING AGREEMENT AS OF THE RESPECTIVE DATES SET FORTH BELOW. Date: ATTEST: OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK By: Linda Andal City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By: Leonie Mulvihill, Deputy City Attorney IV LEIBOLD MCCLENDON & MANN By: David H. Mann, Special Counsel “CITY” CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation and charter city By: Mayor Date: “LICENSEE” RIVER CHURCH USA INCORPORATED, a California nonprofit corporation By: Daniel Darling, Executive Pastor ACKNOWLEDGEMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of ) On ________________, before me, [date] [here insert name and title of the officer] personally appeared [here insert name(s) of signer(s)] who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity/ies, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. Witness my hand and official seal. (Signature) (Seal) Capacity claimed by signer: (This section is OPTIONAL.) ☐ Individual ☐ Corporate Officer(s): ☐ Partner(s): ☐ General ☐ Limited ☐ Attorney-in-fact ☐ Trustee(s) ☐ Guardian/Conservator ☐ Other: Signer is representing: (name of person(s) or entity(ies)) Attention Notary: Although the information requested below is OPTIONAL, it could prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to an unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document: MUST BE ATTACHEDTO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages: Date of Document: DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other than Named Above: Exhibit A – Page 1 EXHIBIT A MAP 1 Elly Morris From:Nicholas J. Taylor Sent:Monday, October 15, 2018 7:37 AM To:Elly Morris Cc:David See Subject:FW: Conditional Use Permit N: 2015-05840 (DEV2015-00121) Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Elly, Correspondence for River Church. Nick Taylor Associate Planner Planning and Building Department City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard │ Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Office (714) 765-4323 E-mail NJTaylor@anaheim.net From: María Jesús Sánchez <msanchez0879@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 7:22 AM To: Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Subject: Conditional Use Permit N: 2015‐05840 (DEV2015‐00121) Good morning Mr. Taylor I hope you had a wonderful weekend. My name is Maria. I’m writing this letter regarding the Conditional Use Permit for River Arena. I would like to review some fact and share with you information about our services. Based on the census data (link attached) and because I am very involved with the social service in the city of Anaheim and have verified in person that families need more social support. Young people more attention and free crime alternatives to have fun. I’m writing and sending you some photos of all the activities that take place at 201 E. Broadway. Anaheim AC. Since River Arena opened its doors It has been done health fairs, back to school, turkey operation, free toys, The community only has to stand in line to receive and enjoy the services and gifts that River prepares with much love. Knowing that not all families can put a turkey on the table on Thanksgiving Day. That many families have more than one child and it is difficult to buy a backpack and school supplies. On Christmas not all families can have gifts to open. Is hard to buy gifts when you have more than 3 kids Not counting the families that have received dental and medical attention for not having health insurance. The percentage of Hispano Latino in Anaheim is 53.6% of the population. River Arena is part of that percentage and we are here to serve that percentage. Im writing this letter to you and I will be NEW CORRESPONDENCE - Item No. 4 2 present so that you consider granting the permits so that we can continue operating and serving the community Sincerely María Sánchez https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/anaheimcitycalifornia/PST045217 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/anaheimcitycalifornia/PST045217 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2018 SUBJECT: ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00155 LOCATION: Citywide APPLICANT: City of Anaheim REQUEST: This is a City-initiated amendment to Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Code) allowing Emergency Shelters to clarify location, permitting and operational requirements for Emergency Shelters and provide regulatory relief during a “shelter crisis” as declared by City Council resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission, by motion, determine that this action is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines under Section 15060(c)(2) and recommend to the City Council that the attached draft ordinance for Zoning Code Amendment No. 2018-00155 be approved. BACKGROUND: In 2007, the Governor of California signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 2 (Cedillo) which amended the California Government Code related to local planning for Emergency Shelters. This legislation requires cities and counties to allow Emergency Shelters in a suitable zone without the need for a discretionary permit, such as a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The public commonly refers to these areas as the “SB-2” Zone. On February 7, 2012, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 6234 allowing Emergency Shelters to be located within the Industrial (I) Zone and certain development areas of the Northeast Area Specific Plan. Ordinance No. 6234 also created provisions for co-locating shelters with Religious and Community Assembly uses, such as churches, and established separation, facility and operations plan requirements for Emergency Shelters. Ordinance No. 6234 codified these standards in Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) of the Zoning Code (see Attachment No. 2). In 2016, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, and rescinded the Northeast Area Specific Plan. As part of the Council’s actions, the Council replaced the permitted locations for Emergency Shelters within the Northeast Area Specific Plan with Development Areas (DA) 1 and 2 of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. ZCA2018-00155 October 15, 2018 Page 2 of 7 In May 2017, the County of Orange opened the first phase of the Bridges at Kraemer, a 200-bed Emergency Shelter located in Anaheim Canyon, at 1000 N. Kraemer Place, generally north of the 91 freeway and west of Kraemer Boulevard. The County anticipates completing the second phase in late 2018. Since this is a County-owned shelter, the project was exempt from the City’s Zoning Code. However, if the shelter were required to comply with the Zoning Code, it would not meet the City’s 1,000-foot separation requirement between Emergency Shelters and property designated for residential land use by the General Plan. However, the 91 freeway provides a barrier between the subject homes and the Emergency Shelter, which may have justified a modification in this separation requirement. On September 12, 2017, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017-140, declaring a public health and safety state of emergency related to the homeless, homelessness and homeless encampments. The resolution directed City staff to take immediate action to provide needed shelter and services for the homeless in our community, and to address unlawful activity within the City and along the Santa Ana River Trail. Subsequently, on August 14, 2018, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-118 declaring a shelter crisis pursuant to Section 8698 et seq. of the California Government Code Section. The Council adopted this resolution in order to participate in the State’s Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP). Although the City of Anaheim had previously adopted Resolution No. 2018-140 with regard to homelessness, Resolution No. 2018-118 contains specific language and text required to participate in HEAP. In light of the adoption of both resolutions, the City Council has declared that there is a “Shelter Crisis,” which is a condition that is not exclusive to the City of Anaheim. On August 6, 2018, the City received a Conceptual Development Review application for a 200- bed shelter proposed on East La Palma Avenue between Miller Street and Tustin Avenue. The application was filed by the applicant in an effort to alleviate and respond to the “Shelter Crisis.” The Code requires approval of a CUP for any Emergency Shelter with over 50 beds; therefore, the proposed project (currently under review) would typically come before the Planning Commission for its discretionary review. However, the Code currently prohibits an Emergency Shelter in the proposed location due to its proximity to residential uses. Additionally, on September 7, 2018, , the City and the Salvation Army commenced negotiations for the potential development of both a temporary and permanent Emergency Shelter on South Lewis Street, between Cerritos Avenue and Ball Road. While negotiations are not yet finalized, the parties are discussing a two-phased approach that would consist of a 200 bed temporary facility that would transition to a permanent facility that would have up to 400 beds. The proposed project would also be subject to Planning Commission review for the approval of a CUP. Although conceptual at this point, the potential exists that either the temporary or the permanent facilities may not be able to comply with all of the Facility and Operations Plan requirements of Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters). These requirements are very specific and, in certain cases, may not reflect what is needed or required to operate in a manner that addresses the need in a state of a Shelter Crisis, while simultaneously minimizing potential impacts to surrounding properties. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. ZCA2018-00155 October 15, 2018 Page 3 of 7 PROPOSAL: Through staff’s review of the above proposals, as well as numerous other public inquiries regarding the City’s “SB-2 Zone,” staff has identified several recommended amendments to Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) that would make the Code section easier to understand and implement. In addition, staff is recommending the option of allowing modifications to the Separation, Facility and Operations Plan requirements of this Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) by CUP in the event of a Shelter Crisis, as declared by a City Council resolution. Finally, the proposed Zoning Code Amendment would require the submittal of an Operations Plan concurrent with the submittal of a CUP, for all projects requiring a CUP. If a project does not require a CUP, the Operations Plan would continue to be required prior to the operation of the facility. For context and background, CUPs are subject to review by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing using the recently expanded 500 foot radius for mailed notices. Planning Commission decisions may be appealed to the City Council. ANALYSIS: Staff is proposing to modify certain sections of Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) to clarify location, permitting and operational requirements for Emergency Shelters as well as provide regulatory relief in the event of a declaration of a Shelter Crisis. The paragraphs below summarize these changes: Location: The proposed amendment clarifies that the City only permits Emergency Shelters on parcels: 1. Designated by the General Plan for Industrial land use; and, 2. Within the Industrial (I) Zone or Development Areas 1 and 2 of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-01 (SP2015-01) Zone. The proposed amendment does not change the locations where the Code permits Emergency Shelters; it just makes this section easier to understand by focusing on the locations where the Code permits Emergency Shelters rather than describing a mix of permitted and prohibited locations. Staff does not recommend allowing a property owner to request a modification of these requirements. Staff conducted substantial outreach prior to the Council’s adoption of Ordinance No. 6234 to recommend shelters in industrial areas; any expansion of the permitted locations should be subject to additional, comprehensive outreach. Separation: The proposed amendment reorganizes and outlines the separation requirements for Emergency Shelters. The following continue to be prohibited locations for an Emergency Shelter: 1. Parcels within 300 feet, measured from the property line, from any other Emergency Shelter, 2. Parcels within 1000 feet, measured from the property line, from any property designated for residential use by the Anaheim General Plan, including any mixed-use designation that permits residential uses, 3. Parcels within 1000 feet, measured from the property line, from any public or private school serving a minor population, any day-care center and any assisted-living facility. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. ZCA2018-00155 October 15, 2018 Page 4 of 7 However, the proposed amendment would allow for modification of these separation requirements subject to the approval a CUP and only during periods of time in which the City Council has declared a Shelter Crisis. Approval: The proposed amendment clarifies, but does not change, the permitting process for the three types of Emergency Shelters below. All three types of Emergency Shelters must also meet the City’s Location, Separation, Facility and Operations Plan requirements for Emergency Shelters, except where the Code permits a modification of the Separation, Facility and Operations Plan requirements by CUP. 1. A single Emergency Shelter housing up to 50 occupants, or a combination of multiple shelters with a combined capacity not to exceed 50 occupants, shall be a permitted use. 2. Religious and Community Assembly Uses may establish on site Emergency Shelters for up to 50 occupants without the need to amend an existing conditional use permit or apply for a new conditional use permit. 3. Any other Emergency Shelter shall be subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit consistent with Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits). Facility: The proposed amendment reorganizes and streamlines the facility requirements for Emergency Shelters. For instance, the proposed amendment combines duplicative requirements for storage areas. All Emergency Shelters continue to be required to comply with Title 15 (Buildings and Housing) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. The proposed amendment would allow the City to modify the following requirements through the approval of a CUP in the event of a Shelter Crisis: 1. Exterior lighting. Exterior lighting plans shall be provided for the entire outdoor area of the site and shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Building and Police Departments. 2. Waiting area. A client waiting area shall be provided and contain a minimum of 10 square feet per bed provided at the facility. The waiting area shall be in a location not adjacent to the public right of way, shall be visually separated from public view by a minimum 6-foot tall screening of mature landscaping or by a minimum 6-foot tall decorative masonry wall, and shall provide shade and protection from the elements. 3. Any outdoor storage, including, but not limited to, items brought on-site by clients for overnight stays, shall be screened from public view. Any outdoor storage areas provided shall be screened from public view by a minimum 6-foot tall wall screened by landscaping or by a minimum 6-foot tall decorative masonry wall. 4. A minimum of one toilet shall be provided for every eight beds per gender. 5. A minimum of one shower shall be provided for every eight beds per gender. 6. A private shower and toilet facility shall be provided for each area designated for use by individual families. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. ZCA2018-00155 October 15, 2018 Page 5 of 7 7. Kitchen facilities and dining hall or designated dining area shall be provided for the preparation and serving of meals for clients and staff. In addition, the facility may provide the following services; however, these services must be in a designated area separate from sleeping areas: 1. Indoor and outdoor recreation facilities. 2. A counseling center for job placement and/or educational, legal, or mental and physical health services. 3. Laundry facilities to serve the clients at the shelter. 4. Other similar facilities and services geared towards the needs of homeless clients. Allowing the modification of the above requirements by CUP would allow flexibility in times when the City is experiencing a Shelter Crisis and may provide opportunities for more creative solutions to providing shelter in these instances. As part of the CUP application, staff would request the applicant provide justification for why any of the above listed facility requirements should be modified. Operations Plan: The proposed amendment would require submittal of an Operations Plan concurrent with the submittal of a CUP application. The Code currently requires submittal of the Operations Plan prior to facility operations. Submitting an Operations Plan with the CUP application would help staff to evaluate its recommendation for the approval of an Emergency Shelter and allow the Operation Plan to be part of the conditions of approval for the CUP. In the event that a CUP is not required for an Emergency Shelter, the Operations Plan would continue to be required prior to facility operation. The Planning and Building Director and Police Chief, or their designee, would review and approve the Operations Plan. The Director or Chief may require that the Operations Plan address specific needs of the facility. The approved Operations Plan must remain active throughout the life of the facility. The Code amendment does not change the review of the Operations Plan, just the timing. The amendment would permit modifications to the minimum requirements of the Operations Plan. Similar to the other modifications, this modification would be subject to the approval of a CUP. The Code amendment does not change, but does rearrange and clarify the minimum requirements of the Operations Plan, which are as follows: 1. Stays at the facility shall be provided on a first-come first-served basis. The facility shall be open 24 hours a day; however, clients shall only be admitted to the facility only between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Clients must check out of the facility by 8:00 a.m. but may remain on the premises to avail themselves of other services offered. Clients must check in daily and have no guaranteed bed for the next night. 2. Maximum length of stay. A person’s maximum length of stay at the facility shall not exceed 180 days in a 365 day period. 3. Alcohol and narcotics use and consumption are prohibited both within the facility and on the property. ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. ZCA2018-00155 October 15, 2018 Page 6 of 7 4. Staffing. A minimum of one (1) staff member per fifteen (15) beds shall be on active duty when the facility is open. 5. Security and safety. Twenty-four (24) hour a day security shall be provided. Security and safety shall be addressed for both on and off-site needs, including provisions to address the separation of male/female sleeping areas as well as any family areas within the facility. 6. Loitering control. Measures regarding off-site controls to minimize the congregation of clients in the vicinity of the facility. 7. Management for outdoor areas. A system for daily admittance and discharge procedures, including monitoring for waiting areas, shall be developed to minimize disruption to nearby land uses. 8. Staff training. A staff training program shall be maintained that provide adequate knowledge and skills necessary to assist clients in obtaining permanent shelter and income. 9. Communications. A communication and outreach plan shall be developed to maintain good communication and response to operational issues which may arise from the neighborhood, City staff, or the general public. 10. Client eligibility. A screening program to determine client eligibility is required. The facility shall also utilize the Orange County region’s current Homeless Management Information System. 11. Counseling services. Provision of or links to counseling services are encouraged. Identify and describe the counseling programs to be provided as well as procedures that will be used to refer clients to outside assistance agencies. An annual report to the City on this activity is required. 12. Litter control. Litter and trash removal attributable to the clients within the vicinity of the facility shall be provided on a continual basis. By providing flexibility in the above requirements, during a time of Shelter Crisis, an Emergency Shelter may have more latitude to operate more efficiently according to the specific needs of each facility and the population it will serve. Findings: Prior to its approval of a CUP, the Code requires the Planning Commission to make the following findings: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a CUP is authorized; 2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. ZCA2018-00155 October 15, 2018 Page 7 of 7 5. That the granting of the CUP under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. In addition to the above findings, prior to the approval of any modifications to the Separation, Facility or Operations Plan requirements for an Emergency Shelter, the proposed amendment would require the Commission to make the additional findings that: 1. The City Council has declared a Shelter Crisis. 2. Strict compliance with the requirements of this Separation, Facility and Operation Plan requirements of Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) would prevent, hinder, or delay the City’s participation in the Homeless Emergency Aid Program and/or the mitigation of the effects of a Shelter Crisis. Environmental Analysis: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the proposed Code amendment is exempt from the CEQA under Section 15060(c)(2) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The Code amendment is exempt because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The development of any future Emergency Shelters will be subject to CEQA at the time of the review of each proposed shelter. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the proposed amendments to the existing ordinance will clarify location, permitting and operational requirements for Emergency Shelters and provide regulatory relief and reasonable opportunities for flexibility during periods of a declared “Shelter Crisis.” The proposed changes would facilitate the development of Emergency Shelters that will provide adequate services to the homeless population while maintaining existing standards that protect sensitive uses. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Zoning Code Amendment. Prepared and submitted by, Susan Kim Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. Existing Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING CHAPTER 18.38 (SUPPLEMENTAL USE REGULATIONS) OF TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO EMERGENCY SHELTERS AND FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS TO PREPARE ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION PER CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES, SECTION 15060(C)(2) BECAUSE IT WILL NOT RESULT IN A DIRECT OR REASONABLY FORESEEABLE INDIRECT PHYSICAL CHANGE IN THE ENVIRONMENT. WHEREAS, in 2007, the Governor of California signed into law Senate Bill No. 2 (2007- 2008, Reg.Sess.) (“SB 2”), which amended the California Government Code related to local planning for Emergency Shelters. This legislation required cities and counties to allow Emergency Shelters in a suitable zone without the need for a discretionary permit, such as a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, on February 7, 2012, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6234 allowing Emergency Shelters to be located within the Industrial (I) Zone and certain development areas of the Northeast Area Specific Plan. Ordinance No. 6234 also created provisions for co-locating shelters with Religious and Community Assembly uses, such as churches, and established separation, facility and operations plan requirements for Emergency Shelters. Ordinance No. 6234 codified these standards in Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) of the City’s Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, in 2016, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, and rescinded the Northeast Area Specific Plan. As part of the Council’s actions, the Council replaced the permitted locations for Emergency Shelters within the Northeast Area Specific Plan with Development Areas (DA) 1 and 2 of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 2017, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017-140, declaring a public health and safety state of emergency related to the homeless, homelessness and homeless encampments. The resolution directed City staff to take action to provide needed shelter and services for the homeless in our community, and to address unlawful activity within the City and along the Santa Ana River Trail; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2018, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-118 declaring a shelter crisis in accordance with Government Code Section 8698 et seq. (a “Shelter Crisis”) in order to participate in the State’s Homeless Emergency Aid Program (HEAP) established by Senate Bill No. 850 (2017-2018, Reg.Sess.); and ATTACHMENT NO. 1 -2- WHEREAS, in light of the adoption of Resolution Nos. 2017-140 and 2018-118, the City Council has declared that there is a Shelter Crisis, which is a condition that is not exclusive to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the City’s police power, as granted broadly under Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has the authority to enact and enforce ordinances and regulations for the public peace, morals and welfare of the City of Anaheim (the "City") and its residents; and WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim desires to now update and amend Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) of the City’s Zoning Code to clarify the location, separation, and approval process for Emergency Shelters and to allow modifications to some standards during a declared Shelter Crisis to better allow the City to combat homelessness and create a continuum of shelter and service options for those living without shelter in the community; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that this ordinance is a matter of citywide importance and necessary for the preservation and protection of the public peace, health, safety and/or welfare of the community and is a valid exercise of the local police power and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local laws and requirements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”) and the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the “State CEQA Guidelines”), the City is the “lead agency” for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2), because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that this ordinance is a matter of citywide importance and necessary for the preservation and protection of the public peace, health, safety and/or welfare of the community and is a valid exercise of the local police power and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local laws and requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. TEXT OF AMENDMENT That Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) of Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended and restated to read in full as follows: -3- 18.38.125 EMERGENCY SHELTERS. An Emergency Shelter, as defined in Section 50801(e) of the California Health and Safety Code, shall comply with all of the following provisions: .010 Location. An Emergency Shelter that meets the Separation, Approval, Facility and Operations Plan requirements of this Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) may locate on any parcel: .0101 Designated by the General Plan for Industrial land use; and, .0102 Within the Industrial (I) Zone or Development Areas 1 and 2 of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-01 (SP2015-01) Zone. .020 Separation. An Emergency Shelter is prohibited on parcels that meet any of the criteria below, unless approved through the approval of a conditional use permit consistent with Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits) and subsection 18.38.125.060 (Additional Findings Required). .0201 Parcels within 300 feet, measured from the property line, from any other Emergency Shelter, .0202 Parcels within 1000 feet, measured from the property line, from any property designated for residential use by the Anaheim General Plan, including any mixed-use designation that permits residential uses, .0203 Parcels within 1000 feet, measured from the property line, from any public or private school serving a minor population, any day-care center and any assisted-living facility. .030 Approval. The following shall be the approval process for an Emergency Shelter that meets the Location, Separation, Facility and Operations Plan requirements of this Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters): .0301 A single Emergency Shelter housing up to 50 occupants, or a combination of multiple shelters with a combined capacity not to exceed 50 occupants, shall be a permitted use. .0302 Religious and Community Assembly Uses may establish on site Emergency Shelters for up to 50 occupants without the need to amend an existing conditional use permit or apply for a new conditional use permit. .0303 Any other Emergency Shelter shall be subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit consistent with Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits). .0304 The Separation, Facility and Operations Plan requirements of this Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelters) may be modified through the approval of a conditional use permit consistent with Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits) and subsection 18.38.125.060 (Additional Findings Required). .040 Facility. All Emergency Shelters shall comply with Title 15 (Buildings and Housing) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and the following requirements, which may be modified through the approval of a conditional use permit consistent with Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits) and subsection 18.38.125.060 (Additional Findings Required): -4- .0401 Exterior lighting. Exterior lighting plans shall be provided for the entire outdoor area of the site and shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Building and Police Departments. .0402 Waiting area. A client waiting area shall be provided and contain a minimum of 10 square feet per bed provided at the facility. The waiting area shall be in a location not adjacent to the public right of way, shall be visually separated from public view by a minimum 6-foot tall screening of mature landscaping or by a minimum 6-foot tall decorative masonry wall, and shall provide shade and protection from the elements. .0403 Any outdoor storage, including, but not limited to, items brought on-site by clients for overnight stays, shall be screened from public view. Any outdoor storage areas provided shall be screened from public view by a minimum 6-foot tall wall screened by landscaping or by a minimum 6-foot tall decorative masonry wall. .0404 A minimum of one toilet shall be provided for every eight beds per gender. .0405 A minimum of one shower shall be provided for every eight beds per gender. .0406 A private shower and toilet facility shall be provided for each area designated for use by individual families. .0407 Kitchen facilities and dining hall or designated dining area shall be provided for the preparation and serving of meals for clients and staff. .0408 The facility may provide the following services; however, these services shall be in a designated area separate from sleeping areas: .01 Indoor and outdoor recreation facilities. .02 A counseling center for job placement and/or educational, legal, or mental and physical health services. .03 Laundry facilities to serve the clients at the shelter. .04 Other similar facilities and services geared towards the needs of homeless clients. .050 Operations Plan. An Operations Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Building Director and Police Chief, or their designee, prior to the operation of the Emergency Shelter, or in the case of a conditional use permit, as part of the application for said permit. The Operations Plan may be required to address additional specific needs as identified by the Director or Chief. The approved Operations Plan shall remain active throughout the life of the facility. At a minimum, the Operations Plan shall contain provisions addressing the following, which may be modified through the approval of a conditional use permit consistent with Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits) and subsection 18.38.125.060 (Additional Findings Required): .0501 Stays at the facility shall be provided on a first-come first-served basis. The facility shall be open 24 hours a day; however, clients shall only be admitted to the facility only between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Clients must check out of the facility by 8:00 a.m. but may -5- remain on the premises to avail themselves of other services offered. Clients must check in daily and have no guaranteed bed for the next night. .0502 Maximum length of stay. A person’s maximum length of stay at the facility shall not exceed 180 days in a 365 day period. .0503 Alcohol and narcotics use and consumption are prohibited both within the facility and on the property. .0504 Staffing. A minimum of one (1) staff member per fifteen (15) beds shall be on active duty when the facility is open. .0505 Security and safety. Twenty-four (24) hour a day security shall be provided. Security and safety shall be addressed for both on and off-site needs, including provisions to address the separation of male/female sleeping areas as well as any family areas within the facility. .0506 Loitering control. Measures regarding off-site controls to minimize the congregation of clients in the vicinity of the facility. .0507 Management for outdoor areas. A system for daily admittance and discharge procedures, including monitoring for waiting areas, shall be developed to minimize disruption to nearby land uses. .0508 Staff training. A staff training program shall be maintained that provide adequate knowledge and skills necessary to assist clients in obtaining permanent shelter and income. .0509 Communications. A communication and outreach plan shall be developed to maintain good communication and response to operational issues which may arise from the neighborhood, City staff, or the general public. .0510 Client eligibility. A screening program to determine client eligibility is required. The facility shall also utilize the Orange County region’s current Homeless Management Information System. .0511 Counseling services. Provision of or links to counseling services are encouraged. Identify and describe the counseling programs to be provided as well as procedures that will be used to refer clients to outside assistance agencies. An annual report to the City on this activity is required. .0512 Litter control. Litter and trash removal attributable to the clients within the vicinity of the facility shall be provided on a continual basis. .060 Additional Findings Required. Before the approval authority, or City Council on appeal, may approve modifications to the requirements of this Section through the approval of a conditional use permit consistent with Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits), it must make a finding of fact, by resolution or written decision, that the evidence presented shows that the following conditions exists: -6- .0601 That the City Council has declared that a shelter crisis exists pursuant to California Government Code Section 8698 et seq., as the same may be amended from time to time; .0602 That strict compliance with the requirements of this Separation, Facility and Operation Plan requirements of this Section would prevent, hinder, or delay the City’s participation in the Homeless Emergency Aid Program established by Senate Bill 850 (2017- 2018 Reg. Sess.) and/or the mitigation of the effects of a Shelter Crisis. SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. The City Council of the City of Anaheim hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, term or word of this ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the City Council that it would have adopted all other portions of this ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any such portion as may be declared invalid. If any section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one (or more) section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase had been declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be printed once within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Anaheim. -7- SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after its final passage. THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the ____ day of ______________, 2018, and thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the ____ day of ______________, 2018, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ANAHEIM By: __________________________________ MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: ______________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 129876/LM 10/8/2018 Chapter 18.38 SUPPLEMENTAL USE REGULATIONS xx http://library.amlegal.com/alpscripts/get-content.aspx 1/2 Print Anaheim Municipal Code 18.38.125 EMERGENCY SHELTERS. An Emergency Shelter shall comply with all of the following provisions: .010 Maximum Occupancy. A single Emergency Shelter housing up to 50 occupants, or a combination of multiple shelters with a combined capacity not to exceed 50 occupants, shall be a permitted use on any parcel within the I (Industrial) Zone or the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-01 (SP2015-01) Zone, excluding properties within Development Areas 3, 4, 5 or 6; however, emergency shelters shall not be permitted in either zone on parcels designated by the General Plan for any residential use, including mixed- use residential. Any other Emergency Shelter in the “I” Industrial Zone or the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-01 (SP2015-01) Zone shall be subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit consistent with Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits). Religious institutions located within the “I” Industrial Zone may establish on site Emergency Shelters for up to 50 occupants without the need to amend an existing conditional use permit or apply for a new conditional use permit, regardless of current combined capacity with any existing Emergency Shelters currently in operation, subject to the minimum development standards contained in this Section. .020 Stays at the facility shall be provided on a first-come first-served basis. The facility shall be open 24 hours a day; however, clients shall only be admitted to the facility only between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Clients must check out of the facility by 8:00 a.m. but may remain on the premises to avail themselves of other services offered. Clients must check in daily and have no guaranteed bed for the next night. .030 Maximum length of stay. A person’s maximum length of stay at the facility shall not exceed 180 days in a 365 day period. .040 Alcohol and narcotics use and consumption are prohibited both within the facility and on the property. .050 Separation of uses. A minimum distance of 300 feet, measured from the property line, shall be maintained from any other Emergency Shelter. A minimum distance of 1000 feet, measured from the property line, shall be maintained from any property designated for residential use by the Anaheim General Plan, including any mixed-use designation that permits residential uses, any public or private school serving a minor population, any day-care center and any assisted-living facility. .060 Staffing. A minimum of one (1) staff member per fifteen (15) beds shall be on active duty when the facility is open. .070 Bicycle racks or bicycle lockers shall be provided by the facility. .080 Exterior lighting. Exterior lighting plans shall be provided for the entire outdoor area of the site and shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Police Departments. .090 Waiting area. A client waiting area shall be provided and contain a minimum of 10 square feet per bed provided at the facility. The waiting area shall be in a location not adjacent to the public right of way, shall be visually separated from public view by a minimum 6-foot tall screening of mature landscaping or by a minimum 6-foot tall decorative masonry wall, and shall provide shade and protection from the elements. .100 Outdoor storage. Any outdoor storage, including, but not limited to, items brought on-site by clients for overnight stays, shall be screened from public view. Any outdoor storage areas provided shall be screened from public view by a minimum 6-foot tall wall screened by landscaping or by a minimum 6-foot tall decorative masonry wall. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 10/8/2018 Chapter 18.38 SUPPLEMENTAL USE REGULATIONS xx http://library.amlegal.com/alpscripts/get-content.aspx 2/2 .110 Facility improvements. All facility improvements shall comply with Title 15 (Buildings and Housing) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and shall also comply with the following requirements: .1101 A minimum of 1 toilet for every 8 beds per gender. .1102 A minimum of 1 shower for every 8 beds per gender. .1103 Private shower and toilet facility for each area designated for use by individual families. .1104 Kitchen facilities and dining hall or designated dining area shall be provided for the preparation and serving of meals for clients and staff. .120 The facility may provide the following services in a designated area separate from sleeping areas: .1201 Indoor and outdoor recreation facilities. .1202 A counseling center for job placement and/or educational, legal, or mental and physical health services. .1203 Laundry facilities to serve the clients at the shelter. .1204 Client storage areas for the storage of bicycles or other personal items. .1205 Other similar facilities and services geared towards the needs of homeless clients. .130 Operations Plan. An Operations Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director and Police Chief, or their designee, prior to the operation of the Emergency Shelter. The Plan may be required to address additional specific needs as identified by the Director or Chief. The approved Operations Plan shall remain active throughout the life of the facility. At a minimum, the Plan shall contain provisions addressing the following: .1301 Security and safety. Twenty-four (24) hour a day security shall be provided. Security and safety shall be addressed for both on and off-site needs, including provisions to address the separation of male/female sleeping areas as well as any family areas within the facility. .1302 Loitering control. Measures regarding off-site controls to minimize the congregation of clients in the vicinity of the facility. .1303 Management for outdoor areas. A system for daily admittance and discharge procedures, including monitoring for waiting areas, shall be developed to minimize disruption to nearby land uses. .1304 Staff training. A staff training program shall be maintained that provide adequate knowledge and skills necessary to assist clients in obtaining permanent shelter and income. .1305 Communications. A communication and outreach plan shall be developed to maintain good communication and response to operational issues which may arise from the neighborhood, City staff, or the general public. .1306 Client eligibility. A screening program to determine client eligibility is required. The facility shall also utilize the Orange County region’s current Homeless Management Information System. .1307 Counseling services. Provision of or links to counseling services are encouraged. Identify and describe the counseling programs to be provided as well as procedures that will be used to refer clients to outside assistance agencies. An annual report to the City on this activity is required. .1308 Litter control. Litter and trash removal attributable to the clients within the vicinity of the facility shall be provided on a continual basis. (Ord. 6234 § 2 (part); February 28, 2012: Ord. 6358 § 4; February 9, 2016.) 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item.