Loading...
PC 1961-1962-138•ati< A RUOUMON or in CITY pLANNINU COMMISSICMOr In CI'T'Y QFAN&UM THA T 1`lf the City Planalnl COFAISSIOU of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Fetid for Variance from SOtMWN PACIFICCompANy, 65 Market street, ,dart Francisco, ornia Owner; Richfield pit Corporation, 645 South Mariposa Avenue, Los sits :,Calif.Ak , Rain real property Situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, state of California, as described in Babibit "A" or as follow .Rat description marked fthibit "A" Incorporated in subject petition and referred to herein as though act forth in full and MMMS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Nall in the City of Anaheim On November 1, 1461 at 2: o'clock F.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required bylawAnd in accordance with the provi- Bions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 13.68, to hear and consider evidence for and against Said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings MuNd recommendations in Connection therewith; and WHUMS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation,gad study made by It- self and in its behalf, and after dine consideration of all evidence and reports offered as said hearing, does find and determinethe following facts: 1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code: Section 1A. .010 to permit the establishment of a storage and distribution outlet of bulk petroleum products in conjunction with a sales office. 2. That there 6 _ _ exceptional ,r extraordinary circumatencee or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the pretty that do net apply generally to the property or class of use in the Same vicinity a nd some. 3. That the requested variance ceSeary for the preservation je _ of of a Substantial Property right possessed by other property to the vicinity and zone, sftd denied to the property in question. 4. That the requested variance materially d0trillOntAl to the public welfare or injurious to the property or Improvements in such vicinity and tons in which the property is located, _.cause the subject property is not adequate to provide for the present installation and the possible future expansion of the proposed use, and because the proposed use 13 an M-2, Meavy Manufarturir , Zone use which is not suitable for the M 1, LA ht Manufacturing, Zane, or compatible with the abutting -1, Our Family Residenital, Zone. 5. That ve-'al opfxasition, in addition to a petitt(,)n of p rate t containing 11 si a tour, was filed against subject petition. A RUOUMON or in CITY pLANNINU COMMISSICMOr In CI'T'Y QFAN&UM THA T 1`lf the City Planalnl COFAISSIOU of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Fetid for Variance from SOtMWN PACIFICCompANy, 65 Market street, ,dart Francisco, ornia Owner; Richfield pit Corporation, 645 South Mariposa Avenue, Los sits :,Calif.Ak , Rain real property Situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, state of California, as described in Babibit "A" or as follow .Rat description marked fthibit "A" Incorporated in subject petition and referred to herein as though act forth in full and MMMS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Nall in the City of Anaheim On November 1, 1461 at 2: o'clock F.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required bylawAnd in accordance with the provi- Bions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 13.68, to hear and consider evidence for and against Said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings MuNd recommendations in Connection therewith; and WHUMS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation,gad study made by It- self and in its behalf, and after dine consideration of all evidence and reports offered as said hearing, does find and determinethe following facts: 1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code: Section 1A. .010 to permit the establishment of a storage and distribution outlet of bulk petroleum products in conjunction with a sales office. 2. That there 6 _ _ exceptional ,r extraordinary circumatencee or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the pretty that do net apply generally to the property or class of use in the Same vicinity a nd some. 3. That the requested variance ceSeary for the preservation je _ of of a Substantial Property right possessed by other property to the vicinity and zone, sftd denied to the property in question. 4. That the requested variance materially d0trillOntAl to the public welfare or injurious to the property or Improvements in such vicinity and tons in which the property is located, _.cause the subject property is not adequate to provide for the present installation and the possible future expansion of the proposed use, and because the proposed use 13 an M-2, Meavy Manufarturir , Zone use which is not suitable for the M 1, LA ht Manufacturing, Zane, or compatible with the abutting -1, Our Family Residenital, Zone. 5. That ve-'al opfxasition, in addition to a petitt(,)n of p rate t containing 11 si a tour, was filed against subject petition. W)W, THE"MM, OR IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission hereby denies VARIAW,11 NO. 14T'� for PERMISSION 7`0 ESTABLISH A STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION OUTLRT OF BULK PETROLEUM PRODUCTS IN CON,11;NCTION WITH A SALM OFFICS, on the ba'.4-is of the aforementioned findings. THE PORBGOIWJ RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 13th (lay of November,1961. CITY OF AN 1M 1, JEAN PAGN Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution we* passed and adopted at meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, hold on November 13,1961 at 2tOO o' Glom P.M., by the following to of the members theroof t AYR $: COMISSIONARS: Allred, Gauer, Pet -ley, Sum-wra. NM,. COMISNICINARS: Marcoux, Mungall, Perry. ASWW-: COWIMOM81 HAPKO(,A, Morris. IN MI WHIA", I have hereunto set my hand this 13th (lay of No r, 1961.