RES-2019-050 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-0 5 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE CIRCULATION
ELEMENT, MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, AND PAVEMENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M (M2)PROGRAM
WHEREAS,the City of Anaheim("City")desires to maintain and improve the streets
within its jurisdiction, including those arterials contained in the Master Plan of Arterial
Highways ("MPAH")and
WHEREAS, the City had endorsed a definition of and process for, determining
consistency of the City's Circulation Element with the MPAH,and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted a General Plan Circulation Element which does
not preclude implementation of the MPAH within its jurisdiction,and
WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a resolution biennially informing the
Orange County Transportation Authority("OCTA")that the City's Circulation Element isin
conformance with the MPAH and whether any changes to any arterial highways of said
Circulation Element have been adopted by the City during Fiscal Years(FY)2017-18 and FY
2018-19,and
WHEREAS, the City is required to send biennially to the OCTA all recommended
changes to the City's Circulation Element and the MPAH for the purposes of re-qualifying
for participation in the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs;
WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a resolution biennially certifying that the
City has an existing Mitigation Fee Program that assesses traffic impacts of new development
and required new development to pay a fair share of necessary transportation improvements
attributable to the new development; and
WHEREAS, the City is required to meet eligibility requirements and submit
eligibility verification packages to OCTA in order to remain eligible to receive M2 funds;
and
WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt and update a Pavement Management Plan
(PMP), using the required format, regarding the status of road pavement conditions and
implementation of the PMP on a biennial basis; and
WHEREAS, the City is required to provide a plan that manages the preservation,
rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing
overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs necessary
to improve paved roads.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of
Anaheim, does hereby inform OCTA that:
a) The arterial highway portion of the City's Circulation Element is in
conformance with the MPAH.
b) The City attests that no unilateral reduction in through lanes has been made
on any MPAH arterials during FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19.
c) The PMP is in conformance with the PMP Submittal Template provided in
the Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines.
d) The City hereby adopts a PMP and has provided an updated PMP report,
using the required format, to OCTA.
e) The Public Works Director,City Engineer or designee is authorized to sign
the PMP certification form.
f) The City reaffirms that the City Council concurs with the existing
Mitigation FeeProgram per Resolution 2015-213, as set forth in Exhibit"A," attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council
of the City of Anaheim this 4 th day of June, 2019,by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Sidhu and Council Members Kring, Barnes,
Brandman, Faessel, and O'Neil
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Moreno
ABSTAIN: None
C /.F ANAHEI
halk A 114
f7•/OR OF ' PT c' •111`AHEIM
ATTEST:
K O HE CITY OF ANAHEIM
122845.2
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, THERESA BASS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the
original Resolution No. 2019-050 adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim
City Council held on the 4th day of June, 2019 by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: Mayor Sidhu and Council Members Kring, Barnes, Brandman, Faessel, and O'Neil
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Council Member Moreno
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of June, 2019.
LERK OF HE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
Exhibit A
Department of Public Works
Proposed Fee Schedule-FY 2015116
Proposed
. Rate FY 15h6
L sERVIPE FEES
Rabe
'A. Plan Checking&Engineering $145 Jhr. {
B. Construction Inspection
Regular $127 /hr. •
Overtime $146 /hr.
C. T.V.Sewer Inspection S2 hrs.minimum) $200 /hr.
1
D. Survey
2-Person Crew $222 /hr.
s
•
3-Person Crew $333 /hr.
E. Real property Services Sat Plan Check&Engineering rate) $145 /hr. '
F. Consultant Services At Contract Rate
G. Clerical $66 '/hr. {
H. Sidewalk Waiver $293 ea, •
I.. Final Map Docurnents $ 4 . /sheet
J. Plans and Specifications Actual Cost {
Mailing Fee $22.28 •
2 SERVICE FEE DEPOSITS .
:A. Traffic Studies
1 Less than 100 Peak Trips $2,175 1
2 100-250 Peak Trips . ' $4,350
3 Over 250 Peak Trips 0 $7,250
B.•Traffic Sinai Splan check&Inspection) $6,000 1
:
•
C.. Design Studies:
a •1 Sewer/Hydrology ' $1,900
2 Right-of-Way Sketches $500. :
3 Specific Plan Reviews $500 '
4 Misc.Technical Reviews . $2,000
5 Sewer Studies/Reviews . i
a. Minor $4,500
b. Major $7,300
D. Plan Checking 3 Inspection
• 1 Tracts-Single Family($10;000 minimum) $750 /lot 1
-Multi-Family($10,000 minimum) $300 /unit
2 Parcel Maps(Tap only)- $5,000
3 Lot Line Adjustment $2,500
4 Improvement Plans . 1
a. Street/Storm Drain $10 /if
'`Minimum.Deposit ' $41500
b. Sewer . $11 /If ;
Minimum.Deposit $3,500 '
} 5 Minor Grading4(no buiidin$pad) $1,000
6 Flatland Grading Plan: '$5,000 1
7 Hallside Grading Plan:
a. Less than 100 cy $3,000 .
b. 100-10,000 cy 0 $5,800'' 1
c. 10,001-100,000 cy $7,700 • ,
1
Department of Public Works
Proposed Fee Schedule - FY 2015/16
Proposed
Rate FY 15/16
d. 100,001 - 1,000,000 cy $12,100
e. Over 1,000,000 cy $16,500
8 Reversion to Acreage $1,200 •
9 Certificate of Compliance $1,100
10 Certificate of Correction $500
E. Technical Real Property Review $1,500
F. Deed Preparation/Processing $800 {
G. Abandonment $2,500
H. Encroachment $1,600
I. NPDES Water Quality Mgmt Plans $1,900 ,
J. Permit Inspection Deposit(formerly excavation deposits) '
1 Single Family-driveway approach $145 min.
2 Single Family-sidewalk $0 {
3 Commercial-driveway approach $800 min.
4 Commercial-sidewalk $450 min.
5 Industrial-driveway approach $600 min.
6 Industrial-sidewalk $450 min.
7 Misc.Commercial/Industrial $900 min.
8 Water/Electrical Service $900 min.
9 Sewer Laterals $900 min. :
10 Groundwater Monitoring(annual) $600 ea.
11 Groundwater Install./Destruction $300 ea.
12 Telecommunications Master Plan $3,800 i
'Fee 110 and it 1(Monitoring requires a 4-hr.min.deposit at the regular
construction inspection rate. :
(Instaliationtdestniction requires a 3-hr.min.deposit) ?
13 Lane Closure $100 /day
3 IMPACT FEES
A. Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees:
1 Single Family $2,029 /unit 1
2 Multi Family $1',297 /unit •
3 Hotel/Motel Room $1,474 /unit
4 Office $3.87 /gsf .
5 Retail/Commercial $5.50 /gsf .
6 Industrial $1.42 /gsf :
7 Peak Hour Trip End $1,285 /trip I
B. Sewer Connection Fee($250 min) $350 /acre
C. Sewer Impact Fees(West Anaheim)
Zone A Zone B Zone 6 Zone D
: 1 Single Family(per unit) $1,322 $2,222 $1x600 $356
2 Multi-Family(per unit) $1,322 $2,222 $1,600 $358
3 Corridor Residential(per unit) $1,322 $2,222 $1,600 $356
4 Mobile Home(per unit) $1,322 $2.222 $11600 $356
5 Hotel/Motel(per unit) $444 $747 $537 $119
` 6 Mixed Use Residential(per unit) $1,322 $2,222 $1,600 $356
7 Mixed Use Non-Residential $614 $1,033 $745 $164 :
8 Commercial(per 1,000 sf of gfa) $614 $1,033 $745 $164 .
9 Industrial(per 1,000 sf of gfa) $430 $724 $521 $116 :
2
Department of Public Works
Proposed Fee Schedule FY 2015/16
Proposed
Rate FY 15/16
— 10 Institutional(per 1,000 sf of gra) $369 $620 $446 $101
11 Quasi Public/Recreational $35 $60 $42 $9 1
D. Sewer Impact Fees(East Anaheim) 4
Zone A Zone B tone C Zone D ,
1 Single Family(per unit) :
Estate $787 $1,101 $0 $0 :
2 Multi-Family(per unit)
Low-medium $0 $1,296 $0l0
3 Mobile Home(per unit) $0 $0 $0 $0
4 Hotel/Motel(per unit) $0 $0 $0 $0 s
5 Commercial Spar 1t00osfa $0 $0 $0 $o i
6 .Industrial(per f1,000 8f) $0 $0 $0 $0 ,i
7 Institutional(pr 1,000 sf) $0 $0 $0 $0
E. Sewer Impact Feet(Central Anaheim)
• Zone A Zone B Zone C Zone.D
I Single Family(per unit) $2,235 $1,864 $21130 $21218
2 Multi-Family(Fier unit) $2,235 $1,864 $21130 $23218 .
3 Corridor.F\esidential(per unit) $21235 • $1,864 $2130 $21218 I
4 Mobile Home(per unit) $844 $702 $805 $838
5 Hotel/Motel(pr unit) . • $631 $527 $602 $628 1
6 Mixed Use Residential.(per unit) • $1,287 $1,073 $1,226 $11278 1
7 Mixed Use Note-Residential $878 $730 , $835 $870
8 Commercial(Iier.1,000 sf of Fifa) $876 $730 $835 $870 1
9 Industrial(per 1,000 sfof pfa) $613 $511 $584 $613 1
10 Institutional(per 1,904 sf of$fa) $525 $439 $501 $509 I
11 Quasi Public/Recreational $50 • $41 • $47 - $50
F. Sewer Assessment Areas: • {
1 Mohler Drive •$1,988 /acre+lateral •
2 Martella Larie . $6,913 /acre+Iateral ,
3 Eucalyptus.Drie(East) • $211016 /acre+lateral {
_.. 4 Eucalyptus Drive(West) $211016 /acre+lateral
5 Timken Canon $16,715 /acre+)eteral
6 Timken Road . ' ' $7,462 /acre+iater l 1
7 Peralta Hills Drive $1,149 /aore+lateral
8 Country gill Road $3,088 /acre+lateral.
9 Lincoln.Ava-Westem St. $1.1911 Rot 1
10 Clementine St:Elrri St. $26,105 /acre 1
11 Coffman St.-Cypress St. • $123890 /acre •
G. Storm Drain Impact Fees(Anaheim Resort Area&South Central :
Anaheirp); j
• 1 Single Family . $191080 /net acre
2 Multiple Family $24,298 /net acre
• 3 Mobile Home $27,812 /net acre
4 Hotel/Motel,Commercial/Recreationai&Industrial $34,769 /net acre
H. Storm Drain Impact Fees(Drainage District 27; not applicable to
platinum Triangle Mixpd Use Ovelqy Zone);
1 Slnple Family $28,599 /net acre
: 2 Multiple Fami $35,161 /net acre
3 Mobile $41,705 /net acre
3
Department of Public Works
Proposed Fee Schedule - FY 2015116
Proposed
Rate FY 15/16
— 4 Hotel/Motel,Commercial/Recreational&Industrial $52,132 /net acre
I. Storm Drain Assessment Areas: '
1 Anaheim Canyon Industrial $2,000 /acre
(initially established by 77R-801)
2 Monte Vista $3,552 /acre
(Initially estabished by 77R-601)
3 Lakeview Avenue $2,436 /acre
(Initially established by 78R-726)
4 Clementine Street $1,200 /acre t
(Initially established by 78R-726)
5 Savana Street $3,575 /acre
(Initially established by 87R-197)
6 Howell Avenue-Sunclair Street $3,262 /acre •
;
(Initially established by 87R-198)
7 Weir Canyon $6,751 /acre
finitely established by 87R-509) {
8 Orangewood Avenue $2,563 /acre
(Initially established by 89R-226)
9 Orannefair Lane-Commercial Street $9,230 /acre :
(Initleliy established by 89R-292)
10 Rivera M. H. Park/Fujishi9e Prop $6,347 /acre
(initially established by 90R-65) i
11 Lemon $7,150 /acre
(Initially established by 93R-149)
1 SUPPLEMENTAL FEES-PLATINUM TRIANGLE PROJECT AREA
A. Traffic Impact Fees .
1 Condominium $3,702.00 /du
2 Apartment $5,015.00 /du I
3 Office $12.00 /gsf
4 Commercial $50.00 /gsf ,
5 Industrial $3.00 /gsf
B. Storm Drain Impact Fees"
1 Single Family $110,888 /net acre
2 Multiple Family $110,868 /net acre i.
'
3 Moble Home $110,868 /net acre
4 Hotel/Motel,Commercial, Recreational and Industrial $110,868 /net acre
1)Applicable to Platinum Triangle Mixed Use overlay zone
C. Sewer Impact Fees i
1 All Land Uses $840 /1,000 gsf'
1)Gross floor building area development greater than 0.4 floor area ratio
D. Arterial Highway Beautification i
1 All Land Uses $18,619 /,gross acre
4
Department of Public Works
Proposed Fee Schedule- FY 2015116
Proposed
Rate FY 15/18
5 PERMIT FEES
A. Right-of-Way Construction:
1 Public Agencies/Public Utility $122
2 Public Utility Annual Blanket permtt $510
3 Single Family(residential) $68
4 Commercial/industrial $245
B. Grading:
1 Flatland $140 '.
2 Hillside $164
C. Transportation'
1 Annual Permit $90 ea.
2 Single Trip $16 ea.
'as authorized by Caltrans and the CA Vehicle Code.
D. Permit Time Extension 6016 of the original perms fee
¢ COPY FEES
:A. Copies(8 1/2"x 11")and(8 1/2"x 141 $0.10 /page
�B. Prints from Laser Fiche(8.1112"x 11")and(11"x 17") $0.75 /pacge.
:C. Copies(11"x 1 T) p0.25 /page
'D. Copies(18"x 24")and(24"x 361 $2 /sheet
E. Prints from Laser Fiche(18"x 24")and(24"x 36") $2 /sheet
F. Standard Detail Book $15 lea.
G. Santiago Landslide(Executive Summar) $11 lea.
H. Compact Discs(w/case) $10 /ea. f
Key. cy =cubic yard
ea, each
gsf =gross square foot
hr. =hour
If =linear foot
min. =minimum
sf =square foot
acre+lat=acre+lateral
du =dwelling unit
5
Planned Roadway
Network
1,41L.„...... ..„:„._., ____.
,---Ai. /01
.
_.. U \
-1111111ifirt.401torit ____,.! air,P1 ,.,,,..„.\ r,,,,.....Je..,
wensinim... •a 1.1--.., 40. --.7.-
r limilsawilliftww--- \v.
- 11/36104111-4111011.11N --;_m„.....„___,r),.....,,- / .11 t. j\C)
i ''''' r \NIIPIAelliiii.NM/
/
1— ,... a 1-1 1111111 pf. i
,e.... f 1 1 i - '��` "pis
. ; f V Roadway Classifications
_ `0, I - - /' Complete Streets Collector
air _� .
Scenic Expressway
Resort Smartstreet
D Stadium Area Smartstreet
y Major Arterial Freewray/rallroad
i Primary Arterial •
I Future Passenger Rail
M --------- Hillside Primary Arterial Grade Separations
rro Collector Street j City Boundary
- Hillside Collector Street . Sphere-of-Influence
Secondary Arterial
Hillside Secondary Arterial
Adopted:May 25.2004 Passenger&Commuter Rail
Revised:March 17,2016
\M/ 0 0 2 Right-of-Way Reserve City of Anaheim
Miks
General Plan Program
Figure C-1 Page C-8
Due to the size of the Pavement Management Plan 2019
Update, only the summarized report is attached.
The entire report (approximately 500 pages) including
attachments can be viewed at the Public Works Engineering
Counter at City Hall during normal business hours.
Attachment 3
City of Anaheim
2019 Pavement Management Plan Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Anaheim (City) performs biennial updates of its Pavement Management
Plan (PMP) to assist policy makers in making decisions for street maintenance as
well as complying with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)'s
Measure M2 Program where the City must biennially adopt and update a PMP. This
report summarizes findings from the 2019 PMP Update.
The City owns and maintains approximately 581.73 centerline miles of pavements,
which includes 156.57 centerline miles of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways
(MPAH) streets (AHS network) and 425.16 miles of local streets (LSS network). Per
OCTA's PMP certification program, all MPAH streets must be inspected at least once
every two years, and local streets must be inspected every six years. For the 2019
update, both the MPAH (AHS) streets and local streets were inspected.
The City monitors pavement conditions by collecting pavement distresses in
compliance with ASTM D6433-111 and as outlined by OCTA in the "Countywide
Pavement Management Plan Guidelines", Chapter 22. Table 1 below summarizes the
network's Pavement Condition Index (PCI) breakdown by functional classification.
Table 1: Network PCI Breakdown
Functional Pavement Area Centerline Average PCI (weighted by area)
Class (sf) Mileage 2017 2019
MPAH (AHS) 54,421,192 156.57 74 71
Local (LSS) 83,828,818 425.16 70 67
Total 138,250,010 581.73 72 69
The 2019 weighted average (by area) PCIS of the City of Anaheim is 69, a three-
point decrease since 2017. Overall, 43.4 percent of the City's street network area is
in either "Very Good" or "Good" condition, approximately 24.4 percent are in "Fair"
condition, and 32.2 percent are in either "Poor" or "Very Poor" condition.
The OCTA Measure M Regional Capacity Program (Project 0) - which provides
Measure M2 grant funding for arterial, intersection, and freeway/arterial
1 ASTM. "ASTM D6433-11."Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Inspections.
2 OCTA. "Pavement Management Plan Guidelines." Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines
Manual. January 2017
3 The weighted average PCI is a result of multiplying the area of each street section by the PCI of that section,
totaling all sections together and then dividing by the total of the network areas or functional classification.
!NCE 1
•
tliA1lEI City of Anaheim
2019 Pavement Management Plan Update
improvements, includes an incentive for successful implementation of a PMP. The
incentive is a 10 percent reduction in local matching fund requirements if either of
the following conditions apply:
a) Show measurable improvement of paved street conditions during the
previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average
system improvement of one PCI point with no reduction in the overall
weighted (by area) average PCI in the MPAH or local street categories;
or -
b) Have street pavement conditions for the overall network during the previous
reporting period within the highest 20 percent of the scale for street
pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No.3, defined as a
PCI of 75 or higher.
The City's PCI does not meet the requirements as noted in the preceding
paragraphs by neither improving the network condition nor maintaining the PCI
above 75 as required by OCTA. The City will therefore not be eligible for the 10
percent reduction in local matching fund requirements for the next 2-year cycle.
Utilizing the StreetSaver PMP software, the following budget scenarios were
performed as part of this report.
Scenario 1: City's Budget ($15.3 Million to $18.1 Million per year) -
At the City's current funding level, the network PCI will decrease from 69 to
62 and the deferred maintenance will increase from $303.6 million to $408.3
million by fiscal year (FY) 2025/26.
Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 69 ($30 Million per year) - The result
shows that the City will need to spend approximately $30 million per year
over the next seven years to maintain the network PCI at 69. Additionally,
deferred maintenance will decrease to $287.1 million by the end of the
analysis period.
Scenario 3: Improve PCI to 70 ($33 Million per year) - At
approximately $33 million per year, the City will be able to increase the
network PCI to 70 by 2021 and maintain it at 70 until the end of the analysis
period. Furthermore, the deferred maintenance will decrease to $262.3
million.
1
ViA1U1N
® City of Anaheim
2019 Pavement Management Plan Update
Conclusion
Based on the pavement condition, the City has not met OCTA's requirements for
receiving a 10 percent reduction in the local matching fund. Furthermore, Scenario
1 illustrates that the City's current annual funding level is inadequate and the
network PCI will continue to decrease over the next seven years.
Recommendations
NCE recommends that the City consider the following:
• Pavement Budget
o NCE recommends that the City should implement a paving program of
approximately $33 million per year (Scenario 3) as it will improve the
City's network condition to 70 in 2021 and allow the City to be eligible
for the 10 percent reduction in local matching fund from OCTA.
• Pavement Maintenance Strategies
o NCE recommends that the City consider alternative treatments such as
Full-depth reclamation (FDR) and cold-in-place recycling (CIR) which
are alternatives to reconstruction and conventional overlays. These
treatments could potentially offer cost savings of approximately 20 to
30 percent compared to traditional treatments.
• Re-inspection Strategies
o In order to continue monitoring the street network and be in compliant
with OCTA Measure M2 requirements, it is recommended that MPAH
(AHS) streets continue to be inspected every two years and residential
(LSS) streets at least every six years.
• M&R Decision Tree
o It is crucial to review and update the M&R treatment strategies and
associated unit costs annually to reflect new construction techniques/
costs so that the budget analysis results can continue to be reliable
and accurate. Note that unit costs have increased approximately 20
percent between 2017 and 2019.
• Additional Funding
o NCE recommends that the City take full advantage of SB-1 and
actively pursue additional pavement funding sources if feasible.
`!NCE 3