Loading...
6476 ORDINANCE NO.6 4 7 6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THAT CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2016-00001 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND GOOD HOPE INTERNATIONAL, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. (DEV2015-00120) (1700 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, Article 2.5 of Chapter 4 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section 65864) of the Government Code of the State of California (herein referred to as the "Statute") authorizes a city to enter into a contract which is called a development agreement in order to establish with certainty what regulations will govern the construction of a development; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the "City Council"), as a charter city, enacted Ordinance No. 4377 on November 23, 1982 (herein referred to as the "Enabling Ordinance"), making the City subject to the Statute; and WHEREAS, pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 65865 of the Statute, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 82R-565 on November 23, 1982 (herein referred to as the "Procedures Resolution"), establishing procedures and requirements for consideration of development agreements by the City upon receipt of an application therefor; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority set forth in the Statute, the Enabling Ordinance and the Procedures Resolution(herein referred to collectively as the "Development Agreement Law") and the City's inherent power as a charter city, the City of Anaheim, on July 26, 2016, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Ordinance No. 6376 approving that certain Development Agreement No. 2016-00001 dated August 18, 2016 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County, California on August 29, 2016 as Instrument No. 2016000409949 (the "Development Agreement") between the City of Anaheim and Good Hope International (the "Developer") with respect to the real property ("Property") depicted and described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference; and WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined herein or in Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement No. 2016-00001 ("Amendment No. 1"), which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference, all capitalized terms shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Development Agreement, as amended. Copies of the Development Agreement are available as a public record in the office of the City Clerk located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California; and 1 WHEREAS, on October 1, 2019, and pursuant to Section 7.5 of the Development Agreement, Developer submitted an application to amend the Development Agreement to extend the Term of the Development Agreement. In response to Developer's request, Amendment No. 1 was prepared; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the "Planning Commission") conducted a public hearing for proposed Amendment No. 1 at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against proposed Amendment No. 1 and concerning all of the prior environmental documentation including the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan , Final Environmental Impact Report No. 311 ("FEIR No. 311"), Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2008-00340 for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ("SEIR No. 340"), and the Addendum to FEIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340, dated April 2016 (herein referred to as the "Addendum), copies of which are on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth, which collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual relating to the proposed amendment and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA Documents"; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of its Resolution No. PC2019-0 4 6 on November 13, 2019, which is incorporated herein by this reference, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 1, and made certain findings that Amendment No. 1 in the form presented at this meeting meets all of the requirements set forth in the Development Agreement Law; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of said Resolution No. PC2019- 0 4 6 summary of evidence, report of findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council did fix the 1 7 day of Dec, 2019, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center, as the place, for a public hearing on proposed Amendment No. 1 and for the purpose of considering the CEQA Documents, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of a resolution concurrently with but prior in time to the introduction of this Ordinance and pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as "CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this City Council, as the "lead agency" under CEQA, has found and determined, based upon a thorough review of proposed Amendment No. 1, and the CEQA Documents, that (i) the CEQA Documents serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for proposed Amendment No. 1 and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA; (ii) none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration have occurred in connection with proposed Amendment No. 1; and (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for Amendment No. 1; and 2 WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 will only extend the Term of the Development Agreement and will not change the land uses or development intensity currently permitted. As such, Amendment No. 1 is a minor change to the Development Agreement and the approval of Amendment No. 1 does not necessitate additional environmental review because it will not result in new or substantially more severe impacts that were not previously evaluated and/or require additional mitigation measures, and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the previously-approved CEQA Documents; and WHEREAS, this City Council, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, including the evidence presented at the Planning Commission meeting and Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2019-0 4 C does find upon review of the land use aspects of Amendment No. 1, as follows: 1. That proposed Amendment No. 1 is consistent with the City's General Plan and with the goals,policies and objectives set forth in the General Plan; 2. That proposed Amendment No.1 is compatible with the uses authorized in and the regulations prescribed for the applicable zoning district; 3. The proposed Amendment No. 1 is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding; 4. The proposed Amendment No. 1 is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; 5. The approval of the Amendment No. 1 constitutes a lawful, present exercise of the City's police power and authority under, is entered into pursuant to, and is in compliance with the City's charter powers and the requirements of the Development Agreement Law. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement No. 2016-00001, in the form presented at this meeting be, and the same is hereby, approved. SECTION 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to attest said Amendment No. 1 for and on behalf of the City. THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 17day of Decembei 2019, and thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 1z day of January , 313d ,cby the following roll call vote: 2020 AYES:Mayor Sidhu and Council Members Faessel , Barnes, Brandman, Kring and O 'Neil NOES:Council Member Moreno ABSENT:None ABSTAIN: None CITY OF ANAHEIM By: II,if J. /A ' 11 ' OF V'E ITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: C "" ' CLERK O THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 1351571A4 4 EXHIBIT "A" DEV NO. 2015-00120 APN: 082-271-10 082-271-09 W DISNEY WAY 131' 73,72' cc 739' 107' CO C 0 CO ctDN 657' O 0 50 ioo v Source: Recorded Tract Maps and/or City GIS. Feet Please note the accuracy is+/-two to five feet. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: THE EAST 660.00 FEET OF THE WEST 720.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 585.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1260 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT SOUTH 0° 13' 22" EAST 15.03 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY SAID POINT BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD 120 FEET WIDE; THENCE SOUTH 0° 13' 22" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 100.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 54' 30" EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL 111.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 13' 22" WEST, PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD 30.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 54' 38" EAST 38.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 13' 22" WEST 84.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FREEDMAN WAY, 60.00 FEET WIDE; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FREEDMAN WAY, SOUTH 89° 54' 30" WEST 134.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 07' 52" A LENGTH OF 23.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT GRANT DEED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECORDED FEBRUARY 11, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19990101952, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL 2: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD 120.00 FEET WIDE AND 60.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, DESIGNATED BY A STAKE MARKED "A", 675 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE NORTH 645 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 22, TO A POINT DESIGNATED BY A STAKE MARKED "B" AT THE JUNCTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 22, WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF LAND FORMERLY OWNED BY H.D. PELHEMUS; THENCE WEST 2640 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22, AND AT A UNIFORM DISTANCE THEREFROM OF 1320 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED BY A STAKE MARKED "C"; THENCE SOUTH 645 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 22 AND AT A UNIFORM DISTANCE THEREFROM OF 2640 FEET TO A POINT DESIGNATED BY A STAKE MARKED "D", 675 FEET DISTANT FROM AND NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE EAST 2640 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22 AND AT A UNIFORM DISTANCE THEREFROM OF 675 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTINUING SAID DESCRIPTION SOUTH 0° 13' 22" EAST 15.03 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 0° 13' 22" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 100.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 54' 30" EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL 111.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 13' 22" WEST, PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD 30.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 54' 38" EAST 38.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 13' 22" WEST 84.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 60.00 FEET OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY 60.00 FEET SOUTH 89° 54' 30" WEST 134.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 07' 52" A LENGTH OF 23.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT GRANT DEED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECORDED FEBRUARY 11, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19990101952, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXHIBIT " B " AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2016-00001 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND,WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: City of Anaheim P.O.Box 3222 200 S.Anaheim Boulevard,Second Floor Anaheim,California 92805 Attn: City Clerk [SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY.] EXEMPT FROM FEES PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE§272383 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2016-00001 by and between CITY OF ANAHEIM and GOOD HOPE INTERNATIONAL AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.2016-00001 This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2016-00001 (this "Amendment No. 1") dated for purposes of identification only as of (the "Date of this Amendment No. 1"), is made and entered into between the CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation and charter city("City"), on one hand and GOOD HOPE INTERNATIONAL, a California corporation("Developer"),on the other hand. RECITALS A. The City and Developer entered into Development Agreement No. 2016-00001, dated as of August 18, 2016 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County, California on August 29, 2016 as Instrument No. 2016000409949 (the "Development Agreement")with respect to the real property("Property") described in the "Legal Descriptions"which are attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. B. In addition to the Property,the parent company of Developer is the owner of the Westin Anaheim Resort located at 1030 W. Katella Ave. Both properties were slated for redevelopment under Anaheim's AAA Four Diamond Hotel Incentive Program, which was established to encourage the development of AAA rated 4-and 5-Diamond hotels within the City's Resort District. C. Subsequent to City Council approval, both the Development Agreement and the development agreement for the Westin Anaheim Resort were the subject of separate referenda. Although Developer originally intended to redevelop the Property prior to the development of the Westin Anaheim Resort, as a result of the referenda,Developer determined to postpone the Project and to first move forward with the Westin Anaheim Resort project, due to its greater priority and benefit to the City. That project is well underway and scheduled to be completed in 2020. D. On November 8, 2018, the City's voters voted in favor of City Measure J, reaffirming the City Council's approval of the Development Agreement. The Development Agreement thereafter went into effect on December 14,2018. E. At the November 8, 2018 election, the voters also approved Measure L, which substantially changed the economic model on which the proposed hotel redevelopments were based, by significantly increasing labor costs at hotels built under public-private partnerships with the City. F. Developer has requested an extension of the Development Agreement to allow the Westin Anaheim Resort to open, reach stabilization, and allow ownership to evaluate the impact of the new economic model imposed by the passage of Measure L, prior to proceeding with the Project. Developer has thus requested the City amend the Basic Term of the Development Agreement, set forth in Section 7.2.1 of the Development Agreement, to extend the existing term of the Development Agreement by 5 years. G. The City and Developer (each, a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties") intend, in this Amendment No. 1,to amend the Development Agreement as stated in Recital F. H. Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 1, all capitalized terms shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Development Agreement. Copies of the Development Agreement are available as a public record in the office of the City Clerk located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard,Anaheim,California. NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The Basic Term set forth Section 7.2.1 of the Development Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following: 7.2.1 Basic Term. The Term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date of this Agreement and shall extend for a period of ten(10)years after the Effective Date,unless extended or earlier terminated as provided herein. SECTION 2. INTEGRATION. Except as expressly provided to the contrary herein, all provisions of the Development Agreement, as amended, remain in full force and effect. The Development Agreement and this Amendment No. 1 are collectively referred to as the"Agreement". The Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions of agreement between the Parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Amendment No. 1 shall take effect upon the date the ordinance of the City Council of the City approving this Amendment No. 1 takes effect. (Signatures shown on following page) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 AS OF THE RESPECTIVE DATES STATED BELOW. "CITY" CITY OF ANAHEIM a municipal corporation and charter city Dated: By: Mayor of the City of Anaheim Mayor Harry S. Sidhu ATTEST CITY CLERK FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM By: Name: Theresa Bass APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROBERT FABELA, CITY ATTORNEY By: Name: Leonie Mulvihill (Signatures continue on following page) "DEVELOPER" GOOD HOPE INTERNATIONAL a California Corporation Dated: By: Mark Chan,Director A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of Orange ) On , before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public,personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies),and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s),or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached,and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of Orange ) On , before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public,personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, THERESA BASS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original Ordinance No. 6476 introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 17th day of December, 2019, and that the same was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 14th day of January, 2020, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: Mayor Sidhu and Council Members Faessel, Barnes, Brandman, Kring, and O'Neil NOES: Council Member Moreno ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of January, 2020. 1 CITY CLE-K OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) Anaheim Bulletin PROOF OF PUBLICATION 2190 S.Towne Centre Place Suite 100 Anaheim, CA 92806 Legal No. 0011354393 714-796-2209 - - - SUMMARY PUBLICATION CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDINANCE NO.6476 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AMENDMENT NO.1 5190168 TO THAT CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.2016-00001 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANA- HEIMANAHEIM,CITY OF/CLERKS OFF AND GOOD HOPE INTERNATIONAL, A CALI- FORNIA CORPORATION, AND AUTHORIZING THE 200 S ANAHEIM BLVD STE 217 MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT FOR AND ANAHEIM, CA 92805-3820 ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. ' I This ordinance approves Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement No. 2016-00001 between the City of Anaheim and Good FILE NO. CAO-#136275-V1 Hope International recorded in the Official Records of Orange County California on August 29, 2016, as Instrument No. 2016000409949 (the "Development Agreement"). Amendment No.1 modifies the AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION opment Agreement to extend the term of the Development Agree- ment by five years,to a total of ten years from the effective date of the Development Agreement. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SS. I,Theresa Bass,City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,do hereby certify that the foregoing is a summary of Ordinance No.6476, which ordi- County of Orange nance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim on the 17th day of December, 2019 and was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Council on the 14th day of January, 2020 by the following roll call vote of the members thereof: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the AYES: Mayor Sidhu and Council Members Faessel,Barnes, County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and Brandman,Kring and O'Neil not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the Anaheim Bulletin, a NOES: Council Member Moreno newspaper that has been adjudged to be a newspaper of ABSENT: None general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, on December 28, 1951, Case ABSTAIN: None No. A-21021 in and for the City of Anaheim, County of The above summary is a brief description of the subiect matter con- Orange, State of California; that the notice, of which the tained in the text of Ordinance No.6476,which has been prepared pur- suant to Section 512 of the Charter of the City of Anaheim. This sum- annexed is a true printed copy, has been published in mary does not include or describe every provision of the ordinance each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in and should not be relied on as a substitute for the full text of the ordi- any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: nance. To obtain a copy of the full text of the ordinance, please contact the 01/23/2020 Office of the City Clerk, (714)765-5166,between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, 11 ` y through Friday. There is no charge for the copy. s0a ds- Publisheu hPd m Bulletin January 23,2020 11354393 I certify(or declare) under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct: Executed at Anaheim, Orange County, California, on Date: January 23, 2020. Signature CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, THERESA BASS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original Ordinance No. 6476 and was published in the Anaheim Bulletin on the 23rd day of January, 2020, pursuant to Section 512 of the City Charter of the City of Anaheim. CITY CLER OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL)