RES-1989-064RESOLUTION NO. 89R-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 88-1 AND
THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RELATING
THERETO HERETOFORE ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
RESOLUTION NOS. 88R-69 AND 88R-70, RESPECTIVELY
WHEREAS, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter
18.93 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the City Council of the City
of Anaheim has heretofore adopted its Resolution No. 88R-69
approving Specific Plan No. 88-1 ("Specific Plan") and Resolution
No. 88R-70 approving Zoning and Development Standards
("Standards") relating to Specific Plan No. 88-1; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing upon
said application, notice of which hearing was given in the manner
required by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after due consideration of all
evidence, testimony and reports offered at said public hearing
does hereby find with respect to said proposed amendment that:
1. The property covered by the specific plan has unique site
characteristics including topography, location and surroundings
which will be enhanced by the special land use and developments
standards of the specific plan;
2. The plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the
General Plan and with the purposes, standards and land use
guidelines therein;
3. The specific plan will result in development of a
desirable character which will be compatible with existing and
proposed development in the surrounding area;
·
and
The specific plan contributes to a balance of land uses;
5. The specific plan respects environmental and aesthetic
resources consistent of economic realities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim that Specific Plan No. 88-1 as approved by
Resolution No. 88R-69, and the Zoning and Development Standards
Relating to Specific Plan No. 88-1 for Sycamore Canyon as approved
by Resolution No. 88R-70, be, and the same are hereby, amended by
amending the development standards for Development Area 3 as set
forth in Section 6.4.1 of said Specific Plan No. 88-1 to read as
follows:
"Development Area 5. Area to be developed for attached
multiple-tamely housing (see Exhibit 25). Ail standards
of the "RM-5000 (SC)" Zone (Chapter 18.51) shall apply
except as provided below:
a ·
Required Site Screening - Except as otherwise
provided herein, a solid decorative type
masonry wall, landscaped earthen berm, or any
combination thereof, totalling not less than
six (6) feet in height, shall be provided along
and immediately adjacent to the site boundary
line of any multi-family development abutting
any freeway, expressway, or any RS
(Residential, Single-Family), or commercial
zone boundary or any alley abutting any such
boundary. The height of any such wall and/or
berm shall be measured from the highest
finished grade level of the building pad of the
dwelling units located nearest any such
abutting boundary. The Planning Director shall
review and approve plans for solid fences
adjacent to any public street in cases where
views could be obstructed.
However, in conditions where a grade separation
between any arterial highway and property line
occurs at a minimum of six (6) feet and a
minimum setback of twelve (12) feet exists
between the multiple-family development and
conditions as stated above, an open decorative
type wail is permitted in order to allow and
preserve view opportunities.
b ·
Maximum Height - Within one hundred fifty (150)
feet of any single-family residential zone, the
maximum height of any building other than
detached one-family dwellings may be two (2)
stories, not to exceed twenty-six (26) feet.
C ·
Structural Setback Requirements - Abutting any
expressway or arterial highway there shall be
provided a landscaped building setback of not
less than twenty-five (25) feet.
d ·
Yard Requirements - Any building wail
containing a main entrance of a window opening
onto a habitable space which faces a street
shall have a yard having a minimum depth of
five (5) feet. Second story elements may
project into these setbacks.
e ·
Streets - Streets other than main entry streets
shall be minimum of twenty (20) feet wide.
022789 -2-
f ·
Minimum Building Site Area - The minimum
building site shall be tWo thousand seven
hundred (2,700) square feet.
Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling - The minimum
livable floor area of any multi-family one
bedroom unit shall be not less than seven
hundred (700) square feet.
h ·
Recreation-Leisure Area - The minimum
recreational-leisure space requirement will be
seven hundred (700) square feet per dwelling
unit.
i ·
Parking - Not less than one and one-half (1.5)
Off-street parking spaces for each bachelor
unit; and not less than two and one-half (2.5)
parking spaces for each one bedroom or larger
unit less than 1,225 square feet in floor
area. For units greater than 1,225 square feet
in floor area, which gain access from a private
street, the minimum requirement shall be 3.5
spaces per unit. One (1) parking space per
dwelling unit shall be covered. Of the total
required spaces noted above, one-half (0.S)
space per dwelling unit shall be reserved for
guest parking.
j ·
Required Location and Type of Wall - A four (4)
foot high wood split rail fence shall border
the northern side of the ten (10) foot wide
equestrian and hiking trail adjacent to the
southerly boundary of the Development Area (The
Summit boundary)."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, except as expressly amended
herein, Resolution Nos. 88R-69 and 88R-70 and Specific Plan No.
88-1 shall remain in full force and effect.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 28thday of February, 1989.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF-ANAHEIM
JLW:lm
2954L
CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 89R-64 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 28th day of February, 1989, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle, Pickler, Kaywood and Hunter
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 89R-64 on the 1st day of March, 1989.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal
of the City of Anaheim this 1st day of March, 1989.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 89R-64 duly passed and adopted
by the Anaheim City Council on February 28, 1989.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM