88-308 RESOLUTION NO. 88R-308
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 3802.
CITY
WHEREAS, after a request for variance by CHANDER P.
SHARMA AND VENU SHARMA, 3356 West Ball Road, Anaheim, California
92804, owners, and DEVELOPERS' ENGINEERS, ATTN: GARY PERKINS,
1401 N. Batavia, Suite 104, Orange, California 92667, agent, to
permit a two (2)-story, twenty-nine (29)-foot high, single-family
residence, was received, a public hearing before the Zoning
Administrator of the City of Anaheim was held upon due and proper
notice, a result of which Variance No. 3802 was granted covering
the following described property:
Parcel 3 in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, as shown on a map filed in Book
223, Pages 32 and 33 of Parcel Maps, in the office of
the County Recorder of said County.
Reserving therefrom: a non-exclusive easement for
ingress, egress, public utilities and incidental
purposes over those portions of said Parcel 3 of said
Parcel Map shown as "Private Drive" on said Parcel
Map; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion, caused
the review of said Planning Commission action at a public hearing
noticed and held as prescribed by law and, as a result thereof,
the City Council does hereby make the following findings:
1. That the applicant failed to present evidence that there
are special circumstances applicable to the property which do not
apply to other property in the same vicinity and zone.
2. That the applicant failed to present evidence that
strict application of the zoning code would deprive the property
of privileges enjoyed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone.
the City
denied.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE
of Anaheim that said
IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Variance be, and the same is hereby,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the time within which
rehearings must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section
1.12.100 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and the time within which
judicial review of final decisions must be sought is governed by
Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Anaheim City
Council Resolution No. 79R-524.
City Council of
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
the City of Anaheim this 26th day of July, 1988.
'i ANAHEIM
~YOR OF TH~ CITifY O
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
JLW: fm
2662L
072888
CLEFoK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 88R-308 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 2oth day of July, 1988, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Pickler
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Bay
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Ana~eim signed said
Resolution No. 88R-308 on the 2nd day of August, 1988.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ~mve hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 2nd day of August, i988.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Ana[~eim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 88R-308 duly passed and
adopted by the Anaheim City Council on July 26, 1988.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM