88-177RESOLUTION NO. 88R-177
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY (IN3NCIL OF THE c±'rf OF ANAheIM
APPRDVING AN APPLICATION FOR A
OF 1980, AM~qDED 1983, AND ~ZING THE ~1'1%[ MANAgeR TO
WHEREAS, Activities and Programs under Title I of the C~L,,~nity
Devel~L~_nt Act of 1980, amended 1983, have been duly considered and
appropriate public hearings have been conducted; and
WHEREAS, such solicitation of public opinion has resulted in a "Final
Statement of C~m.~r~ity Development ~bjectives and Projected Use of
Funds"; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby gives assurance that tb~ City of
Anaheim will c~uly with all laws, regulations, and executive orders
as more particularly set forth in that certain D~partment of Housing
Urban Development document entitled "Certifications," a o~py of which
is attacbmd b~reto as Exhibit "A" and rode a part b~-reo~ as thoug~
fully set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the city of
Anaheim, hereby approves the "Final Statement of C~,~.~nity Development
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" as the Application for the
Fourteenth Year funding under Title I of the Housing and C~m~nity
Development Act of 1980, amended 1983.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city Manager of the City of Anaheim
be, and he is hereby, authorized to execute and file said Apglication
for a Cc~m~nity Development Block Grant pursuant to the Housing and
C~m,~nity Devel~nt Act of 1980, amended 1983.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is a~u~roved and adopted by the city Council
of the City of Anaheim this 3rd day of May, 1988.
~.CITY c~4f OF THE c£'l%~ OF ANAhEiM
S'iATL OF CALiFORJqIA )
~OON2Y OF OF~qGE ) ss.
CITY OF /kNAHE±M )
i, l~qN lq. SAUVAGEAU, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 88R-177 was introduced and adopted
at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City oi
Anaheim nei~ on the 3rd day o£ May, l~O, by the following vote of the members
thereol:
AYEb:
COUNCIL MEP~BERS: Enrle, Hunter, Kaywood, and Bay
NOES: CO[INCi~ MENBERS: None
COUNCIL MEF~B~iKS: Pickier
AJqD I FORTHER certify tttat the Mayor or the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. g6R-177 on tile 4th day of May, 19~.
l. iq WITNESS WItE~iEOF, i have hereunto set my trend and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 4th day of May, 1988.
ASSISTkNT CiTYCLFRtK OF CITY OF A/q~dfEIM
l, AIqN M. SAOVAGkLAU, Assistant City Clerk of the City or Anaheim, do hereay
certify ttmt the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 88R-177, duly
passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on May 3, 1988.
EXHIBIT A
The Grantee Certifies that:
(a) It possesses legal authority to make a wz~nt sukmtission and to execute a
C~uL~utity development and housing program;
(b)
Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a
r~solution, motion or similar action authorizing the person identified as
the official representative of the Wz~ntee to submit the final statement
authorizing the person identified as the official repr~m~_ntative of the
grantee to act in connection with the suhnission of the final statement
and to provide such ~dd~tional information as may be required;
(c) Prior to sukmdm~ion of its final statement to }RJD, the grantee has:
met the Citizen participation rec~]~rements of 570.302(a) (2) and has
provided citizens with:
ae
the estimate of the amount of CDBG funds proposed to be used
for activities that will benefit persons of low and moderate
its plan for minimizing displacement of persons as a result of
activities assis~a~ with CDBG funds and to assist persons
acbm]ly displaced as a result of such activities;
prepared its final statement of C~L,L~rtity devel~L~nt objectives
and projected use of funds in aocordance with 570.301(a) (3) and
rode the final statmm~nt available to the public;
(d) It is following a detailed citizen participation plan which:
provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular
e~phasis on participation by persons of iow and moderate income who
are residents of slt~ and blighted areas and of ar~ in which
funds are proposed to be used, and provides for participation of
residents in low and moderate inczm~ neighborhoods as defined by
the local jurisdiction;
provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local
meetings, information, and records relating to the grantee's
proposed use of funds, as :r~q3]'~'~"ed by ~ regulations of the
Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under tb~ Act;
provides for technical assistance to groups representative of
persons of low and moderate incc~e that request such assistance in
developing proposals with the level and type of assistance to be
determined by the grantee;
1
provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and to respond
to proposals and questions at all stages of the c~L~lnity
development program, including at least the develop, Lent of needs,
the review of pzuposed activities, and review of program
performance, which hearings shall be held after adequate notioe, at
times and locations convenient to potential or actual
beneficiaries, and with aoccmm~datic~ for the handicapped;
provides for a timely written answer to written c~laints and
grievances, within 15 working days where practicable;
identifies how the meeds of non-English speaking residents will be
met in the case of public hearings where a significant number of
non-English speaking residents can be r~onably expected to
participate;
(e) The grant will be conducted and administered in c~liance with:
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
Title VI of the civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352; 42
U.S.C. &2000d et seq.); and
Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-284; 42
U.S.C. &3601 et seq.);
It will affirmatively further fair housing;
It has developed its final stat~nent of projected use of funds so as to
give maxim/m f~ible priority to activities which benefit low and
moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums
or blight; (the final stat~nt of projected use of funds may also include
activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other
c~m~nity devel~ent needs having a particular urgency because existing
conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of
the c~L~,unity, and other financial resources are not available); except
that the a99=egate use of CDBG funds received under section 106 of the Act
and, if applicable, under section 108 of the Act, during the 1988-89 ,
program year(s) (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two,
or three consecutive years), shall principally benefit persons of low and
moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 60 percent of
such funds are used for activities that benefit such persons during such
period;
It has developed a c~m~nity develu~,~nt plan, for the period specified in
paragraph (g) above, that identifies c~m,unity development and housing
needs and specifies both short and long-term c~mL~nity devel~/t
objectives that have been developed in accordance with the primary
objective and requir~nents of the Act;
It is following a current housing assistance plan which has been approved
by HUD;
2
(J)
(k)
(1)
It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public i~provem~nts
assis~ in whole or in part with funds provided under sectic~ 106 of the
Act or with amounts resulting f~,~L, a guar~r~ under section 108 of the
Act by assessing any amount against pk~arties owned and occupied by
persons of low and moderate inoc~e, including any fee chaz~ed or
assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public
funds received under section 106 of the Act are ~ to pay the
proportion of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital
costs of such public i~pr~ve~=_nte that are finanoed f~LL revenue
sources other than under Title I of the Act; or
for purposes of assessing any amount against pzu~erties owned and
occupied by persons of moderate inoc~e, the grantee certifies to
the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under section
106 of tb~ Act to c~ly with the ~ of subparagr~ (1)
above;
Its notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures concerning
lead-based paint will c~,~ly with &570. 608; and
It will cc~ply with the other provisions of the Act and with other
applicable laws.
3
EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED ST~r~ENT OF OC~9{UNA'rY DEVELOI~M~qT
OB/E~i~AVES AND I~DJE~£~3 USE OF FUNE~
OVERALL GOALS
%he proposed 1988-89 Cxmm~,~nity Devel~l~,~nt Block Grant (CDBG) Program for the
City of Anaheim will undertake activities f£~, the perspective of meeting the
primary objective of Title 1 of the Housing and C~t,~mtnity Develo~L~-nt Act of
1974, as amended, which is the devel~,~nt of viable urban c~m~nlties by
providing decent housing, a suitable enviror~ent and e~ econc~nic
opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. OJmm~n%ity
Development Block Gr~nt funded activities will meet the standard of one of the
three broad nstionsl objectives. Tnese objectives are that the activities
(1) benefit low ard model~ate inc~ne persons, (2) aid in the prevention or
elimination of slums and blight and, (3) are designed to meet the CU~Lm~ity
development needs having a particular urgency which pose a serious or inm~diate
threat to the health or welfare of the c~,u~,~nity.
The major need in revitalizing neighborhoods in Anaheim is to improve housing
and other physical conditions. The ho~sing and neighborhood improvements which
will be funded through the 1988-89 CDBG entitlement grant will be concentrated
OBIECTIVES
1. Housing and Neighborhood I~prove~_nts in Targeted Areas
The central area of Anaheim has b~en designated as the location of the four
CDBG Target areas which are: Central City, Citron, South Anaheim, and
Patrick Henry. The long term objective for the four areas is to preserve
neighborhoods, rehabilitate housing, z~a~ve substar~rd housing, preserve
historic ho~sing structures, remove physical barriers to the handicapped in
housing units, and provide for public i~provements, park development,
neighborhood facilities and related public service programs necessary to
stabilize or revitalize neighborhoods. %~e short term objectives and goals
are to concentrate on rehabilitation of existing housing, c~,~lete or
initiate needed park improv~nents, recreational and neigtlborhood facilities
and public work (i.e., construction of storm drains, street recon-
struction), market rehabilitation loans for rental units tied to Section 8
(Housing Assistance Program) participation, ard to continue code
enforcement activities in the CDBG Target Ar~m~. The City of Anaheim's
1988-89 Cc~,L~nity Development Block Grant Progra~ will reflect a continued
concentra~ effort of manpower and resources to meet the P~c~s of persons
The following housing improvement programs will be continued in the four Target
Areas:
CDBG funded rehabilitation loans for eligible owner-occupant households in
the ta/~et areas
Owner-investor rehabilitation loans to benefit low and moderate income
renters
1
Housing improvement incentives which include rebates and tool rental
assistance
Infill housing incentives designed to encourage owners of dilapidated
housing units to build replacement housing units to be rode available to
low income residents
The following activities will be implemented in each respective Target Area for
neighborhood enhanc~nent:
Central City Neighborhood Target Area:
Improvements to George Washington Ccmmm~nity Cente~ which includes handicap
access on west side, landscaping improvements, installatic~ of autc~atic
double entry doors with panic bars and security improv~ents to reception
area
Reconstruction of restroc~s at west side of Pearson Park
South Anaheim Neighborhood Target Area:
A h~an and social service study in t_he Jeffrey-Lynne apartment area and
funds towards cost of implementation of rec~L,L~_ndations
2. Citywide A~tivities
The majority of substam~d housing is located in the four CDBG Target
Ar~m~ but substaDdmrd housing does exist in neighborhoods thrc~t the
city on a spot basis. Low interest rehabilitation loans will be made
available to low and moderate income persons on a citywide basis. First
priority in processing loan applications will be given to those persons
residing in the Target Ar~.
Cleanup campaigns will continue to be implemented as a public service in
the CDBG Taz~et Ar~. ~ese campaigns consist of providing large trash
b/ns strategically placed to encourage general cleanup and beautification
efforts by Anaheim residents. The Neighborhood Improv~ent Program of
Anaheim (NIPA) will receive an allocation of $50,000 to be used for
salaries and other administrative costs. NIPA is a neighborhood based
nonprofit organization whose purpose is to encourage and facilitate private
and public reinvestment in the apa~,~nt al~ near Manzanita Park in the
Patrick Henry Target Area. A small allocation is eamarked for the Orange
County Council on A~ing to provide federally mandated cm~m~an service to
elderly residents in long-term care facilities throughout the County.
Anaheim Interfaith Shelter, Inc., a local c~mLunity based nonprofit
organization whose purpose is to provide shelter to homeless families, was
allocated a grant to cover operational costs. The Orange County Center for
Health is to receive the second part of their original request for funds, a
grant of $50,000, to acquire a facility to provide child care services to
mildly ill children of low income residents. H~pe House, Inc., has been
allocated a small grant of $4,000 to help defray ~_rational costs while
providing alcohol and drug rehabilitation servioes to youth. Additionally,
a grant in the amount of $67,000 to expand oarrent youth outreach services
in the South Anaheim Target Area, specifically, the Jeffrey-Lynne
Family Services.
Graffiti l%s~oval Services will continue to provide its service in the CDBG
Target Ar~, as will Code Enforcement inspections.
Activities to affirmatively further fair housing will be provided by the
Orange County Fair Ho~sing Council throug~ a contractual agreement with the
city. An allocation of $54,500 has been earmarked for this purpose.
1988-89 FUNDING ALLOCATION
~ne entitlement grant allocation for the CDBG program year beginning July 1,
1988, that tb~ city of Anaheim will receive fr~ the Department of Housing and
Urban Development is $2,205,000.
Proposed activities were reoa~m~nded during public hearings and meetings held
by the O~m~nitywide CDBG Citizen Participation C~lu~ttee. Funding c~m~,~t~ents
were made at an Anaheim city Council public hearing.
ASSESSM~qT OF RELATIONSHIP
Attachment A is an assessment of the relationship of the use of funds to the
C~nity Develo~_nt objectives identified in Final Statem~J~t for 1987-88 as
well as to the broad national objectives. Activities proposed for funding fr~n
the 1988-89 grant are described in the following section.
3
PROPOSED PROGRAM AcrlvrrY
Below is a ~ of the housing, neighborhood improv~m~_nt and public service
activities which will be funded by the 1988-89 C~,~nity Develui~nt Block
Grant:
HOUSING, Rf~ABII/TA_TION & PRES~a{vATIC~q ACTIVi'iu ~-~:
$1,276,000
1. Loan subsidies, deferred loans, housing
incentives, including rehab service costs ......... $875,000
2. Code Enforcement ................................... 251,000
3. Relocation services ............................ .... 150,000
I~JBLIC $~RVICE ACTEvrr~FS AND ~PIf~gT IDANS/GRANTS:
$ 303,000
Library Book~obile ................................. $ 35,000
2. Graffiti Removal Services .........................
3. Neighborhood I/~provementProgramofAnaheim .......
4. O.C. Council on Aging .............................
5. Anaheim Interfaith Shelter ........................
6. O.C. Center for Health ............................
7. Hope House ........................................
8. Turning Point Family Services .....................
9. Neighborhocd Council Cleanup Ca~aigns ............
30,000
50,000
7,000
40,000
50,000
4,000
67,000
20,000
NEIGHBOrhOOD/PARK //~PROVf]~f~FI~:
$ 155,000
1. WashintonCenter Improv~m~_nts ...................... $ 25,000
2. Jeffrey-LynneAreaHuman & Social Service
Study/Implementation ............................. 50,000
3. Pearson Park RestroomReconstruction ............... 80,000
$ 227,000
1. General Management & Overhead Costs ................ $172,500
2. Fair Housing ~tivities ............................ 54,500
CITIZ~ PARTICIPATION:
$ 45,000
$ 199,000
$2,205,000
4
ASTAC~H~T A
RELATIONSHIP OF USE OF ~ TO O2~R~JN~'I'~ DEV~PMENT OB/E~I'~VES
IN THE FINAL STAT~I~ENT
The City of Anaheim's C~L~nity Devel~L~nt Block Grant Pro~£~in for 1986/87 and
1987/88 were undertaken with the intent of meeting the following national
objectives: prevention or elimination of slum~ and blight; and principally
benefiting low and moderate inccme households t~ the activities
undertaken. ~ target areas, as described in the Final Statement of 1987/88,
are retained in an effort to concentrate manpower and resources to revitalize
deteriorating neighborhoods and to meet the needs of residents in those areas.
The following housing improvement prr~£~n~ were implem~ne~ or continued in the
four CDBG Target Areas:
CDBG funded rehabilitation loans for eligible households in the target
areas (also Citywide on a spot basis)
Owner-investor rehabilitation loans to benefit iow and moderate income
renters (also Citywide)
Deferred loans (also citywide)
Rebates for housing i~provements (Tal~et Areas only)
Tool rental assistance program for hc{ne i~provement projects of iow and
moderate income hc~eowners (Target Areas only)
Infill/new construction technical assistance to property owners who wish to
demolish older, dilapidated structures and reconstruct newer housing units
to be occupied by low and moderate income tenants
The housing i~provement programs are intended to conserve the housing stock and
meet the objective of principally benefiting low and moderate income residents,
in t_he Target Areas and Citywide throu~ spot rehabilitation of housing. The
city of Anaheim recognizes that although the majority of substardard housing is
located in the Target Areas, substandard housing unite are found sprinkled
throughout the City on a spot basis.
Various public works projects were implemented. These projects met two
objectives: benefit to areas in which the majority of households were low or
moderate incomes, and contributed to the prevention or elimination of blight.
Neighborhood i~provement activities i~plem~nted in low/moderate income areas
were as follows:
1
CENTRAL CITY NEIG~9OIH~OOD TARc~'i' AREA
AcccmEJlished in 1986/87:
Vine Street Storm Drain design, c~,~leted
Little People's Park redevel~Ia~_nt design, Cu,~leted
Senior Citizen Center elevator installation, o~,~leted
Olive Street reconstruction frc{n Broadway to Santa Aha Street, c~LEuleted
Intend to accomplish in 1987/88:
In~provements to George Washington Center inc],~ng restrc~ renovation,
security lighting, installation of fire alarm~, underway
R~develcpment of Little People's Park, undezway
Design work for Day Care Center (City owned lot on Parry Street), RFP
Vine Street Storm Drain construction, underway
Senior citizen Center expansion design, underway
C-'rD~)N NEIGHBORHOOD ~m' AREA
Acc~,~Jlished in 1986/87:
South Street sidewalk construction (South Street at Citron Street),
c~leted
Santa Ana Street sidewalk construction (just east of Janss), completed
Ellsworth Street reconstruction, c~,~leted
West Street Storm Drain construction (West at Vineyard), c~leted
Citron Street Storm Drain construction (Cypress Street to T,incoln Avenue),
c~,~leted
Intend to acc~LEJlish in 1987/88:
New Citron Park study/design
New Citron Park development
SOUTH ANAHEI~ NEIGHBORHOOD TAI~I' AREA
Accomplished in 1986/87
Goodhue/Walnut Storm Drain design, c~L~leted
Intend to acc~L~lish in 1987/88
Ponderosa Park ballfield lights i~provements, under design
Ponderosa Park security lights installation, under design
Goodhue/Walnut Storm Drain construction, underway
Ponderosa Park Volleyball court comstruction, underway
PATRICK H~NRY NEIGHBORHOOD ~r AREA
Intend to accomplish in 1987/88:
Redevelopment of Manzanita l~ark including activities building expansion,
play area construction, picnic area improvements, underway
NIPA Area streetscape design
I~pl~mentation of Tiez~d Study rec~,,e_ndations to include rehabilitation of
multifamily units and some street impr~v~_nts
Code enforcement activities and graffiti r~m~val servioes oontinued in
1987-88. Other services funded in 1987-88 and targeting_ to benefit 10w and
moderate ~ residents incl~ed: youth outreach workers in the Central City
and Patrick Henry Target Ar~m provided under contractual aw£~sm~n~t with
Turning Point Family Services to work with high risk youth; the Neighborhood
I~prowm~nt Program of Anaheim which c~ncentrates its efforts at working with
tenant groups and apartment owner associations with the goal of i~pr~ving the
f~evy Chase apa~L~nt area neighborhood in the Patrick Henrf Target Area; the
L~hrary Bookmobile provides outreach library services to residents in low
income neighborhoods. Cleanup campaigns were re-i~plemented as a public
service in the Target Area neighborhoods to encourage pride of ownership and
beautification; Catholic Social Services provides information and referral
services, emergency food, translations and other social services in low income
neighborhoods in the Target Am=mm. The Orange County Center for Health
received an award of $30,000 as a portion of their request to provide child
care services to mildly ill children of low inccm~ residents.
The Orange County Fair Housing Council was allocated $40,000 for 1986-87 and
$52,000 for 1987-88 to provide services which affirmatively further fair
housing for Anaheim residents.
No new objectives were developed during the program y~mr. Once all projects
and activities are c~leted, the objectives for 1986-87 and 1987-88 prow£~m
years will have been met.
3