88-362 RESOLUTION NO. 88R-362
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 3827.
WHEREAS, after a request for variance by JACK NOSEK, et
al., 1206 W. Ash Avenue, Fullerton, California 92633, owner, and
THOMAS MAURER & ASSOCIATES, ATTENTION: RICK CRANE, 150 E1 Camino
Real, No. 200, Tustin, California 92680, agent, was received, a
the Zoning Administrator of the City of
due and proper notice, a result of which
denied covering the following described
public hearing before
Anaheim was held upon
Variance No. 3827 was
property:
THE LAND REFERRED TO iN THIS REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, AND IS
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE WESTERLY 74 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 195 FEET OF THAT
PORTION OF LOT 11 OF THE MILES RANCHO, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 4, AT PAGE 7
OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT,
332.35 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT;
THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 9' 15" WEST 1318.71 FEET, MORE
OR LESS, TO A POINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 11;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT, 174
FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON A DIRECT LINE
1318.71 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID LOT 174 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion, caused
the review of said Planning Commission action at a public hearing
noticed and held as prescribed by law and, as a result thereof,
the City Council does hereby make the following findings:
1. That there no special circumstances applicable to the
property which do not apply to other property in the same vicinity
and zone.
2. That strict application of the zoning code does not
deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in
the same vicinity and zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that said Variance be, and the same is hereby,
denied.
BE IT FURTttER RESOLVED that the time within which
rehearings must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section
1.12.100 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and the time within which
judicial review of final decisions must be sought is governed by
Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Anaheim City
Council Resolution No. 79R-524.
THE
City Council of
1988.
FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
the City of Anaheim this 20th day of September,
MAYOR O~F THE~CI~T OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
JLW:fm
2748L
092188
-2-
CLERK
S%ATE OF CB~LIFO~IA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ~NAJ{EIM )
I, LEONORA N. S0flL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 86R-362 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 20th day of September, 1988, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Pickler and Bay
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSEi~T: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood
~qD i FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 88R-362 on the 28th day of September, 1988.
iN WITNESS WMEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal
of the City of Anaheim this 28th day of September, 1988.
CITY CLEP~K OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, ~EONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 88R-362 duly passed and
adopted by the Anaheim City Council on September 20, 1988.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF AN~A{EIM