Loading...
Public Comments Received 04/07/20 Council Meeting_L Item # , , Distributed to majority of pity Council within Jennifer L. Hall 7� hours o� '�i �1����,c, From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mayor and City Council, Theresa Bass Monday, April 6, 2020 5:30 PM Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jordan Brandman; Trevor O'Neil; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Denise Barnes; Stephen Faessel Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; daniel@presidiosc.com; Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Robert Fabela; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Jennifer L. Hall Public Comments -Council Meeting April 7, 2020 PublicCommentCCM040720-Distributed040620_1 (Closed Session).pdf; Pu b l i cCo m me ntCC M 040720_D i stri b u ted 040 620_ 1. pdf Attached you will find a PDF with one (1) public comment related closed session. The second PDF includes two (2) public comments; the first related to unemployment during the crisis, and the second regarding Item No. 17 (Request for Rehearing) on the April 7 Council Agenda. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Theresa Theresa Bass, CMC City Clerk City ofA naheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. #217 Anaheim, CA 92805 Email: tbass , � allaheim.net Phone: (714) 765-5166 1 Fax: (714) 765-4105 Pub!!c Comment From: buddyfitzt Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 1:55 PM To: Public Comment Cc: mgoodman@aclusocal.org; BHamme@aclusocal.org Subject: Anaheim Apr 7 Closed Session Public Comments Attachments: Closed Session Anaheim.pdf Attached Closed Session Comment for April 7, 2020 council meeting. City of Anaheim withholding police criminal killings info. Anaheim City Council Closed Session Comments, April 7, 2020, VIA EMAIL TO:. ubliccomment (i. anaheim,net FROM Home owners Maintaining our Environment .,4,; The purpose of Closed Session Comments is to inform the public of serious matters such as Anaheim Police criminal conduct. Itis understood that the council discussions on such matters are to be secret. However, to keep secret the incidents of police criminal actions from the public is wrong. The closed session calendar has five items on it. Four of the items are kept p completely secret from the public. The American Public has the rights to know the subjects (not the discussions), so they could research the matter and give constructive comments to the council. That is the American way and is not the procedure in other countries that have limited transparency for their citizens. The only closed session item that included basic information was the brutal murder by Anaheim police officers of an innocent Latino young man, Vincent Valenzuela. According to the video, without warning, the Latino, who was washing his clothes at a Laundromat, was beaten then strangled from an illegal chokehold by the Anaheim police officers. The courts awarded the deceased man's family $13.2 million, which the residents of Anaheim must now pay. It is believed one of the other four closed session items that are Dept hidden from the public was the Caucasian Anaheim police officer killing of a young Negro man just before last Christmas. According to the video, the 11uppity" Negro was standing two feet with his back turned in front of the Caucasian Anaheim police officer when he was shot four times in the back. Of interest could be the Freedom of Speech violations by the Anaheim City Council in censoring Closed Session Public Comments. They are not included in the official video or audio recordings of the council meeting, in the "action" minutes of the meeting, or in the meetings' repeated cable TV broadcasts. Item # ID A- Q,\ . Distributed to majority of City Council within Jennifer L. Hall 72 hours of Qijjj__ meetin . From: Sent: To: Cc* C Subject: Attachments: Mayor and City Council, Theresa Bass Monday, April 6, 2020 5:30 PM Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jordan Brandman; Trevor O'Neil; Lucille bring; lose Moreno; Denise Barnes; Stephen Faessel Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; daniel@presidiosc.com; Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Robert Fabela; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Jennifer L. Hail Public Comments -Council Meeting April 7, 2020 PublicCommentCCM040720_Distributed04O620_1 (Closed Session).pdf; Pu b I i cCo m m entCC M040720_D ist ri buted040620_1. pdf Attached you will find a PDF with one (1) public comment related closed session. The second PDF includes two (2) public comments; the first related to unemployment during the crisis, and the second regarding Item No. 17 (Request for Rehearing) on the April 7 Council Agenda. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Theresa Theresa eresa Bass, CMC City Clerk City ofAnaheim 200 S Anaheim Blvd #217 Anaheim, CA 92805 Email: tbass. manaheim.net Phone: (714) 765-51661 Fax: (714) 765-4105 Public Comment From: Pedro Garcia Sent: Monday, April 5, 2020 4:47 PM To: Public Comment Subject: Comments for the meeting Hi my name is Pedro Garcia i am a concerned citizen of Anaheim in district 5. My concern is with the 6.5 million dollars being used to fund visit Anaheim when it appears we will not be having that area even be open due to this crises. Even more so it seems completely inappropriate to not have it be closely monitored. With so many of us out of work. What is the city doing for the unemployed? Sent from my iPad Public Comment From: buddyfitz Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 2:19 PM To: Public Comment Cc: mgoodman@aclusocal.org; BHamme@aclusocal.org Subject: Apr 7, 2020, Council Public Comment Attachments: Apr 7, Public Comment.pdf Attached: April 7, 2020 council meeting public comment with documentation for council members. Clear violations of Free Speech to prevent public comments at Anaheim Council Meetings. Anaheim City Council Comments, April 7, 2020, Agenda Items VIA EMAIL TO. i bliccomment{_= anaheim.net FROM: Home Owners Maintaining our Environment. The current agenda for this council meeting has been inaccessible on the internet to the public. The City of Anaheim is now requiring an unavailable authorization code (see the attached unauthorized 401.2 notice). Past meeting agendas were available while the current agenda and staff reports were not. A demand for rehearing on the Anaheim Dills non -conforming Serrano residential project is to be scheduled at this current meeting agenda. The developer has threatened an expensive lawsuit to be paid by the residence of Anaheim (and not council members). Grounds for the lawsuit are serious misconduct by Council Member Trevor O'Neil and the facts that such horrible projects have routinely been permitted in Latino areas of Anaheim (Pauline Street) but not in the white Anaheim Hills areas. The rehearing must be allowed to prevent the unnecessary legal costs to the City of Anaheim. In the to be agendaize Virus discussion item, Anaheim City Council members being led by their Mayor Hari sh S. Sidue has lowered themselves again by exploiting the National virus Emergency. They are preventing public participation by not allowing verbal comments at their meetings. The ruling of "to male public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise' requires comments to be made "telephonic," which is by voice. Mayor Harish S. Sidue and his cabal on the city council have maliciously interpreted the rule to mean only in writing, not telephonic. As a bare minimum, the city council should have a clerk read the submitted written public comments during the public comments periods at the council meetings. Attached to this public comment are three pages of evidential documents to be handed out to each council member by the City Clerk. City Council Agendas Pant Current Agenda For Agendas & Updates Action Agendas SubscHbe to No Me HTTP Error 401. - Unauthorized You are not authorized to view this page due to invalid authentication headersm Most likely causes: e No authentication protocol (including anonymous) is selected in IIS. o Only integrated authentication is enabled, and a client browser was used that does not supe ort integrated authentication. • Integrated authentication is enabled and the request was sent through a proxy that changed the authentication headers before they reach the web server. The web server is not configured for anonymous access and a required authorization header was not received. ■ The "co nfiguratio n/system.webServer/authorization" configuration section may be explicitly denying the user access. Things you can try: • verify the authentication setting for the resource and then try requesting the resource using that authentication method. • Verify that the client browser supports Integrated authentication. • Verify that the request is not going through a proxy when Integrated authentication is used. Verify that the user is not explicitly denied access in the"configurationfsystem.webServer/a uthorization" configuration section. Create a tracing rule to track failed requests for this HTTP status code. For more information about creating a tracing rule for failed requests, click here. Detailed Error Information: Enable:_ Google. Translate 4/4/2020 ll5 8.5 Deta Red Error- 400.2 - Unauthorised HTTP Error 401,,2,- Unauthorized You are not authorized to view this page due to invalid authentication headersd Most likely causes: • No authentication protocol including anonymous) is selected in IIS. • Only integrated authentication is enabled, and a client browser was used that does not support integrated a uthentication. • Integrated authentication is enabled and the request was sent through a proxy that changed the authentica tion headers before they reach the web server. • The Web server is not configured for anonymous access and a required authorization header- was not receiv ed. • The "configuration/system.webServer/authorization" configuration section may be explicitly denying the use r access. Things you can try: • Verify the authentication setting for the resource and then try requesting the resource using that authentica tion method. * Verify that the client browser supports Integrated authentication. * Verify that the request is not going through a proxy when Integrated authentication is used. Verify that the user is not explicitly denied access in the "configuration/system.webServer/authorization" co nfiguration section. • Create a tracing rule to trach failed requests for this HTTP status code. For more information about creating a tracing rule for failed requests, click here. Detailed Error Information: Module IIS Web Core Requested http://Iocal.anaheim.net: 8o/docs;agend/questys pub/2 Notificati AuthenticateRequest URL 4766/Agenda.htrni on Physical Pa E:\webs\anaheim_net\docs_agend\questys_pub\74766 Handler HTML processed by ASP th \Agenda:html Error Cod Ox80o7OOO5 Logon Meth Not yet determined e od Logon User Not yet determined More Information: This error occurs when the Www -Authenticate header sent to the Web server is not supported by the server config uration. Check the authentication method for the resource, and verify which authentication method the client used. The error occurs when the authentication methods are different. To determine which type of authentication the clien t is using, check the authentication settings for the client. View more information * Microsoft Knowledge Base Articles: * 907773 * '753667 local.anaheim.netldocs—agendlquestys pub/24755/Agenda.html ill Public Participation for City Council Meetings in Response to COVID=19 SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19 On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-10. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-20-20 (superseding the Brown Act -related ,provisions of Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeping to observe and to address the local legislative body. Pursuant to Executive Order N-20-20, please be advised that the Anaheim City Council will participate in meetings telephonically. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Pursuant to Executive N-20-20 and given the current health concerns, members of the public can access meetings lure on-line, with audio and limited video, at www.anf3-heim.r-ie'L)coun'J,ilvideos and on Cable Channel 3. In addition, members of the public can submit comments electronically for City Council consideration by sending them to publiccommentanaheirn.net. To ensure distribution to the City Council prior to consideration of the agenda, please submit comments prior to 3:00 P.M. the day of the meeting. Those comments, as well as any comments received after 3:00 P.M., will be distributed to the City Council and will be made part of the official public record of the meeting. Contact the City Clerk's office at 714-755-5166 or cityclerk anaheim.net with any questions. ACCESSIBILITY: If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1000 (42 U.S.C. sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability -related modification or accommodation, in order to observe and/or offer public comment may request such reasonable modification, accommodation, aid, or service by contacting the City Clerk's Office by telephone at (714) 755-5166 or via email to cityclerk anaheim.net, no later than 8:00 AM on the day of the scheduled meeting. 11:N 1r H 11 1v City Council Agendas Action Agendas Ckv Q)mndiideos r fir. Ire��pm��A View City Council Meetings Live & Archived 2020 Irl CalemTar 2020 City Council Meeting calendar �] Enable Google Translate Jennifer L. Hall From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mayor and City Council, Item # Distributed to majority of City Council within 72 hours of G(SsN\'a meeting. Theresa Bass Friday, April 3, 2020 6:10 PM Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jordan Brandman; Trevor O'Neil; Lucille Kring; Jose Morena; Denise Barnes; Stephen Faessel Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; daniel@ presidiosc.com; Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Robert Fabela; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Jennifer L. Hall Public Comments -Council Meeting April 7, 2020 Pu b l icCom mentCCM 040720_Distri b utedO4O324-1. pdf Attached is one (1) public comment related to Item No. 17 (Request for Rehearing) on the April 7 Council Agenda. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Theresa Theresa Bass, CMC City C'ler'k City afAnaheim 200 S Anaheim Blvd. #217 Anaheim, CA 92805 Email: tb as s ana 1eim.net Phone: (714) 765-5166 1 Fax: (714) 765-4105 1 Public Comment From: Moses Johnson Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 5:25 PM To: Theresa Bass; Chris Zapata; Robert Fabela; John Woodhead; Ted White; Nicholas J. Taylor; Public Comment Subject: Item #17 Council Agenda April 7th -request for rehearing Dear City Clerk, Please send my email to the Mayor and all Council members. Also please confirm receipt. I request that the Council deny the developer's request for rehearing for all the reasons the Council restored the Neighborhood Center on March 1 oth. See my earlier email below. Thanks, Moses Johnson Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sundae, March 8,2020,10:06 PM, Moses Jolinson Nvrote: Dear City Clerk, Please confirm receipt of this email and send it to the Mayor and all Council members. I urge the City Council to repeal General Plan Amendment No. 2017-00515 and rescind Resolution No. 2020-012 to restore the Serrano Center as a Neighborhood Center. Also, to deny the Request for Rehearing filed by the developer. The Zoning Reclassification ordinance was properly rejected by the Council on February I Ith. Thank you. But in order to restore the Serrano Center back to a Neighborhood Center the General Plan also needs to be put back to where it was to begin with. The Council heard from many residents in the surrounding neighborhoods regarding all their objections to this proposed project including evidence that the Serrano Center is a viable commercial center that contains many children -based businesses including a dance school, swim school, daycare center and martial arts academy that serve the surrounding neighborhoods. These businesses provides vital after school activities for children including those from the adjoining Anaheim Hills Elementary School. The adverse impacts on views, air and light to neighboring properties caused by the 3 story condo buildings which are incompatible with the surrounding 2 story neighborhoods and inconsistent with the General Plan. The General Plan discourages development of muti-family developments in existing single-family neighborhoods. The lot is too small (3 acres) for 54 units when 5 acres are required by the Scenic Corridor. Further, to allow buildings to face Serrano Ave. from only 14 feet away from the street is dangerous when a 54 foot setback is required. A car will end up in someone's living room if this is built. The project is too dense and all exits onto Nohl Ranch Road are right only forcing those wanting to head back to the 91 Freeway to make a right onto Carnegie Ave, right on Calle Venado and attempt to make a dangerous left turn onto Serrano Ave. This is a blind curve and the City recently put up a flashing yellow sign to alert drivers of exiting vehicles. Please put an end to this project. Sincerely, Moses Johnson Anaheim, CA 92807 Item # A` . Distributed to majority of City Council within Jennifer L. Hall 72 hours of L �l meeting. From: Theresa Bass Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 10:18 AM To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jordan Brandman; Trevor O'Neil; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Denise Barnes; Stephen Faessel Cc: Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; daniel@presidiosc.com; Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Lisa Hughes; Loretta Day; Jennifer L. Hall Subject: FW: Stop Deployment of Wireless during Quarantine Mayor and City Council, Forwarding the below received from Brigette Gentil regarding a request to impose a "moratorium on "small cells" and other wireless infrastructure permits process and deployment until the COVID-19 emergency is over" Thanks, Theresa From: Brigette Gentil . Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 11:13 PM To: Theresa Bass <TBass@anaheim.net> Subject: Stop Deployment of Wireless during Quarantine Dear Ms. Bass, Dear Mayor & City Council Member, We ask that you impose a moratorium on "small cells" and other wireless infrastructure permits process and deployment until the CDVID-19 emergency is over. The wireless providers are using the CDVID-19 emergency as cover to expand and cement their rapid and virtually unsupervised deployment of harmful wireless infrastructure. Our local leaders should not have to dedicate time and resources to policing Whether the wireless companies are following local and state law, they have far more important things to do. The FCC wireless permit rules allow emergency moratoria. Homeland Security guidelines emphasize that maintenance of existing communications capability is the priority. New construction is not "essential." The CDVID-19 emergency has led to a government shut down of non-essential activity. Hospitals, emergency response and local officials are overwhelmed and they must be allowed to focus on what is indeed "essential". Now is not the time to be dedicating resources to expanding, rather than just maintaining, our networks. The FCC has directly held a local jurisdiction can impose a temporary halt to deployment and permits during emergencies. In the Matter of Accelerating wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers, FCC 18- 111, 33 FCC Rcd 7705, 7784-7785, ¶157 (2018) ('we recognize that there may be limited situations in the case of a natural disaster or other comparable emergency where an express or de facto moratoria that violates section 253(a) may nonetheless be `necessary' to `protect the public safety and welfare' or to `ensure the continued quality of telecommunications services."') Homeland Security has declared that local government is on the forefront and can take control over determining whether to temporarily halt all non-essential activity. Homeland Security guidance documents prioritize maintenance of existing Communications Systems, and do not support "essential" status for new construction. See Homeland Security Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, Identifying Critical Infrastructure During CDVID-19, http s: //www. cis a. 5W ov/identifn -critical-infrastructure-durin,--covid-19 (local control); e- ritical Infrastructure and Ivey Resources Support Annex, ht-il-,://www.fcma.--..o -.df/emerti: encs, /nrf/nrf su 1 art cikr.l)df (focus on "protection, response, recovery, and restoration"). Homeland Security, like the FCC, understands that it is essential in an emergency situations justify focusing on protecting, responding, recovering and restoring of existing systems, but new communications facilities construction is and should be deemed nonessential, and subject to lockdown for so long as we are under emergency conditions. Cities can and should impose a moratorium on deployment in their local area and freeze the permit process until the COVED -19 emergency is over. Sincerely, Brigette Lentil Anaheim, CA 92805 Jennifer L. Hall From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mayor and City Council, Item # _ Pa . Distributed to majority of City Council within 72 hours of �Lq&meeting. Theresa Bass Friday, April 3, 2020 12:37 PM Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jordan Brandman; Trevor O'Neil; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Denise Barnes; Stephen Faessel Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; daniel@presidiosc.com; Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Lisa Hughes; Loretta Day; Jennifer L. Hall; Rudy Emami FW: Stop Deployment of Wireless during Quarantine As follow-up to the email from Brigette Gentil regarding a request to impose a "moratorium on `'small cells" and other wireless infrastructure permits process and deployment until the COVID-19 emergency is over" Please see the below response to Ms. Gentil from Public Works Director Rudy Emami. Thank you, Theresa From: Rudy Emami <REmami anaheim.net> Sent: Friday, April 3, 202010:11 AM To: Cc: Ted White ETedWhiteanaheim.net>; David Belmer <DBelmer - anaheim.net>; Lisa Hughes <LHu hese.- anaheim.net>; Denise Barnes �DBarnes(,_—anaheim.net�; Chris Zapata Cha ata anaheim.net>; Raul Garcia <%arcia1.._Z anaheim.net> Subject: RE: Stop Deployment of wireless during Quarantine Good Morning Ms. Gentil, Thank you for your email below. Councilmember Barnes and the City Manager have asked me to look into this issue and respond on their behalf. While we understand your very valid concerns, the state of California has defined the communications sector as part of the Essential Jobs in the Governor's executive order on COVID-19. I reviewed the link to the defined essential jobs and found multiple sections that do include the installation of new communication facilities as critical. The safety of the public and our employees is our top priority. If the communication companies at their own will choose to continue work at this time, we do ensure they perform their work in a safe manner for our community and the city inspectors that are overseeing the work. elle look for proper detours for pedestrians, traffic control, social distancing and proper use of personal protective equipment. I think we have all experienced the impact the stay home order has had our wireless communication system. I have certainly experienced a change in signal quality on my mobile devices with more people at home using wireless communication to Work and stay in touch with friends and family. It is Vital that we continue to improve our communication infrastructure. If you have any other questions, please give me a call at 714-765-5065. Thank you, Rudy H. Emami, M.S., P.E. Director of Public Works City of Anaheim Department of Public Works 200 south Anaheim Boulevard Suite 276 Anaheim, CA 92805 Office+ (714) 765-5065 Fac+ (714) 765-5225 E-mail+ remamiv�anaheim.net Public Works I Proiect View Finder From: Brigette Lentil Date: April 2, 2020 at 11:12:44 PM PDT To: Denise Barnes <DBames anaheim.net> Subject: Stop Deployment of Wireless during Quarantine Reply -To: Brigette Lentil Dear Ms. Barnes, Dear Mayor & City Council Member, We ask that you impose a moratorium on "small cells" and other wireless infrastructure permits process and deployment until the CDVID-19 emergency is over. The wireless providers are using the CDVID-19 emergency as cover to expand and cement their rapid and virtually unsupervised deployment of harmful wireless infrastructure. Our local leaders should not have to dedicate time and resources to policing whether the wireless companies are following local and state law, they have far more important things to do. The FCC wireless permit rules allow emergency moratoria. Homeland Security guidelines emphasize that maintenance of existing communications capability is the priority. New construction is not "essential." The CDVID-19 emergency has led to a government shut down of non-essential activity. Hospitals, emergency response and local officials are overwhelmed and they must be allowed to focus on what is indeed "essential". Now is not the time to be dedicating resources to expanding, rather than just maintaining, our networks. The FCC has directly held a local jurisdiction can impose a temporary halt to deployment and permits during emergencies. In the Matter of Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers, FCC 18-111, 33 FCC Rcd 7705, 7784-7755, ¶157 (2018) ("We recognize that there may be limited situations in the case of a natural disaster or other comparable 2 emergency where an express or de facto moratoria that violates section 253(a) may nonetheless be `necessary' to `protect the public safety and welfare' or to `ensure the continued quality of telecommunications services.`91) Homeland Security has declared that local government is on the forefront and can take control over determining whether to temporarily halt all non-essential activity. Homeland Security guidance documents prioritize maintenance of existing Communications Systems, and do not support "essential" status for new construction. See Homeland Security Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency, Identifying Critical Infrastructure During CDVID-19, htti-,s:llwww.cisa. ovlidentifw 1nu- critical -infrastructure-during-covid-19 (local control); e - Critical Infrastructure and Ivey Resources Support Annex, htt :11www. felna.. ovl� dfle�-ner� L enc\. /nrf/nrf-sup , o--ciknit df (focus on "protection, response, recovery, and restoration"). Homeland Security, like the FCC, understands that it is essential in an emergency situations justify focusing on protecting, responding, recovering and restoring of existing systems, but new communications facilities construction is and should be deemed nonessential, and subject to lockdown for so long as we are under emergency conditions. Cities can and should impose a moratorium on deployment in their local area and freeze the permit process until the CDVID-19 emergency is over. Sincerely, Bfigette Lentil Anaheim, CA 92805 item # a l � , Distributed to majority of City Council within Jennifer L. Hall 72 hours of From: Theresa Bass Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 1:54 PM To: Jennifer L. Hall Subject: FW: Stop Deployment of Wireless during Quarantine For our records. From: Rudy Emami <REmami@anaheim.net> Sent: Friday, April 3, 20201:05 PM To: patie nce. ha ncock . Cc: Theresa Bass {TBass@anaheim.net>; Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim.net>; David Belmer <DBelmer@anaheim.net>; Mike Lyster EMLyster@anaheim.neta; Chris Zapata <CZapata@anaheim.net>; Lisa Hughes <LHughes@anaheim.net3; Raul Garcia <rgarcia1@anaheim.net>; Annie Mezzacappa <AMezzacappa@anaheim.net> Subject: RE: Stop Deployment of Wireless during Quarantine Good Morning Ms. Hancock, Thank you for your email below. The Mayor asked me to look into this issue and respond on his behalf. While we understand your very valid concerns, the state of California has defined the communications sector as part of the Essential Jobs in the Governor's executive order on COVID-19. I reviewed the link to the defined essential jobs and found multiple sections that do include the installation of new communication facilities as critical. The safety of the public and our employees is our top priority. If the communication companies at their own will choose to continue work at this time, we do ensure they perform their work in a safe manner for our community and the city inspectors that are overseeing the work. We look for proper detours for pedestrians, traffic control, social distancing and proper use of personal protective equipment. I think we have all experienced the impact the stay home order has had our wireless communication system. I have certainly experienced a change in signal quality on my mobile devices with more people at home using wireless communication to work and stay in touch with friends and family. It is vital that we continue to improve our communication infrastructure. If you have any other questions, please give me a call at 714-755-5065. Thank you, Rudy H. Emami, M.S., P.E. Director of Public Works City of Anaheim Department of Public Works 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Suite 276 Anaheim, CA 92805 Office+ (714) 765-5065 Fax+ (714) 765-5225 E-mail+ remamidianaheim.net Public Works I Project View Finder From: Patience Hancock Date: Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:24 PM Subject: Stop Deployment of wireless during Quarantine To: Hon. Harry Sidhu <hsidhu..:'� i anaheim.net> Dear The Honorable Sidhu, Dear Mayor & City Council Member, We ask that you impose a moratorium on "small cells" and other wireless infrastructure permits process and deployment until the CDVID-19 emergency is over. The wireless providers are using the CDVID-19 emergency as cover to expand and cement their rapid and virtually unsupervised deployment of harmful wireless infrastructure. Our local leaders should not have to dedicate time and resources to policing whether the wireless companies are following local and state law, they have far more important things to do. The FCC wireless permit rules allow emergency moratoria. Homeland Security guidelines emphasize that maintenance of existing communications capability is the priority. New construction is not "essential." The CDVID-19 emergency has led to a government shut down of non-essential activity. Hospitals, emergency response and local officials are overwhelmed and they must be allowed to focus on what is indeed "essential". Now is not the time to be dedicating resources to expanding, rather than just maintaining, our networks. The FCC has directly held a local jurisdiction can impose a temporary halt to deployment and permits during emergencies. In the Matter of Accelerating wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers, FCC 18- 111, 33 FCC Rcd 7705, 7784-7785, ¶157 (2 018) ("we recognize that there may be limited situations in the case of a natural disaster or other comparable emergency where an express or de facto moratoria that violates section 253(a) may nonetheless be `necessary' to `protect the public safety and welfare' or to `ensure the continued quality of telecommunications services."') Homeland Security has declared that local government is on the forefront and can take control over determining whether to temporarily halt all non-essential activity. Homeland Security guidance documents prioritize maintenance of existing Communications Systems, and do not support "essential" status for new construction. See Homeland Security Cybers ecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, Identifying Critical Infrastructure During COVID-19, ht p s //www. cisa..ov/identi f`v i n� -critical-infrastructure-during-covid-19 local control); e - Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Support Annex, httil://www.fema.,-,ov/pdf/emergencs,/nrf/nrfmsui-ii)ortm cikr. df (focus on "protection, response, recovery, and restoration"). Homeland Security, life the FCC, understands that it is essential in an emergency situations justify focusing on protecting, responding, recovering and restoring of existing systems, but new communications facilities construction is and should be deemed nonessential, and subject to lockdown for so long as we are under emergency conditions. Cities can and should impose a moratorium on deployment in their local area and freeze the permit process until the COVID-19 emergency is over. Sincerely, Pntipnne TTancnc;k Anaheim, CA 92806 THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAWS. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately. Thank you. item # d1 . Distributed to majority of City Council within Jennifer L. Hall 72 hours �� � � meeting. From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mayor and City Council, Theresa Bass Tuesday, April 7, 2020 11:26 AM Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jordan Brandman; Trevor O'Neil; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Denise Barnes; Stephen Faessel Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; daniel@presidiosc.com; Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Robert Fabela; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Jennifer L. Hall Public Comments -Council Meeting April 7, 2020 Pu bi icCo m mentCCM04072o_D istri butedo4o72o_1.pdf Attached are public comments (10 emails) received as of 11:00 am, April 7, 2020 for council consideration. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Theresa Theresa Bass, CMC City Clerk City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Blvd. #217 Anaheim, CA 92805 Email: tb as s, , anaheim. net Phone: (714) 765-5166 1 Fax: (714) 765-4105 1 Public Comment From: Michelle Schumacher Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 9:40 PM To: Public Comment Subject: TCA - Toll Roads Good evening City Council I am writing to you today to ask for your support in reducing a significant tax on all Orange County residents that often times goes unnoticed. Are you aware that the Transportation Corridor Agency (The "TCA") has taxed OC homeowners to the tune of $706,334,000.00 million since the Agency was established in 1987. This tax comes in the form of Development Fees that are assessed on new residential and commercial properties developed within Orange County. The TCA was formed in 1987 with the explicit purpose of constructing the 73, 241 and 261 Toll Roads. At the time that the TCA was established bonds were issued to pay for construction of these new Toll Roads. The promise made by the TCA at the time was that the debt taken on by the TCA for construction of these new Toll Roads would be pard off through a combination of Development Fees and Tolls collected on the roads by drivers who use the roads. 100% of the debt was to be pard off within 20 years and the Toll Roads were supposed to become Freeways like the rest of the Interstate Highways within our great State of California. As it turns out the TCA has horribly mismanaged their role and has squandered these silent taxes paid for by your constituents. Not only are the 73, 241 and 261 still Toll Roads and not Freeways, but the TCA is still over $4.7 BILLION in debt for construction of these roads — years after the roads were supposed to become free. This is a dereliction of duty and a travesty for Orange County Taxpayers. By the time the bonds are repaid it will cost 11. Billion dollars - the debt is going in the WRONG direction. The TCA recently released a draft a vision Flan - where they are trying to do other things than just pay down the existing bonds and get involved outside thier lane. It is time to cut the head of the snake and have teh TCA solely focus on paying down the bonds, instead of driving up housing and the cost of business in our County with these empty toll roads. Thankfully, the agency CEO who drive up more debt and refinanced the bonds more than a zero dow home in the inland empire will be leaving - its time to get this agencies spending in check and have them focus on real mobility which is paying down the bonds so the congestion free toll roads can be open for all drivers. Thank you Public Comment From: Laguna Streets Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 10:35 PM To: Public Comment; LB City Council Cc: Michelle Schumacher Subject: Public Comment for City Council Meetings Dear City Council Members and Public Comment Record, In preparation for your Tuesday 7 April meetings I am providing two charts showing an economic analysis of the Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Roads project. The chart data comes from the 2013 TCA Bond Issue document (464 pages), the economic analysis considers the life of each bond issue and maturity in that package from 1995 to 2053. The analysis computes the equivalent annualized amount for every bond, revenue, and expense recorded in that document both present and projected: • Bonds Series 1995, 1999, 2013ABC • Bond Debt Service • Developer Impact Fees • operating Expenses • Toll Fee Revenue The first chart shows the total anticipated revenue to cover the actual bond debt service and anticipated expenses for all the bonds. TCA Toll Roads s B orad Analysis Annua['[Zed_ Costs Completed. Toll Road $800 c $700 0 $6UO $rydp, Al I Revenues Lo $400 Debt Service U $300 - $200 3 so Zs F,isca! Year The next chart shows the annualized net revenue after expenses in each year. I TCA Toll Roads Bond Analysis Annualized Net Certs or Gash Flow [WIffions] $60U $4W a $2,00 .RON ,ril�ll� k �l Fiscal Year The charts show the actual revenue income prior to the bond retirement and refinancing in 2013, and the projected revenues anticipated after 2000. Compare the actual revenues to the projected. The actual net revenues prior to 2013 are a realistic measure of future performance. If you believe the projected revenues are suspect notwithstanding the COVID-19 impact and higher toll rates on total toll revenues, if you believe this bond financing is suspicious, if you believe this public debt will NEVER sunset, then investigate the TCA. Respectfully Submitted, Les Miklosy MM Lao -Puna Streets 2 Public Comment From: Michelle Schumacher Sent: Monday, April 61 2420 11:15 PM To: Michelle Schumacher Subject: Public Comments for City Council Meeting Good evening City Council I am writing to you today to ask for your support in reducing a significant tax on all Grange County residents that often times goes unnoticed. Are you aware that the Transportation Corridor Agency (The "TCA") has taxed OC homeowners to the tune of $706,334,000.00 million since the TCA a government Agency was established in 1987. This tax comes in the form of Development Fees that are assessed on new residential and commercial properties developed or remodeled within Grange County. The TCA was formed in 1987 with the explicit purpose of constructing the 73, 241 and 261 Toll Roads. At the time that the TCA was established bonds were issued to pay for construction of these the Toll roads. The promise made by the TCA at the time was that the debt taken on by the TCA for construction of these new Toll Roads would be paid off through a combination of Development Fees and Tolls collected on the roads by drivers who use the roads. 100% of the debt was to be paid off within 30 years and the Toll Roads were supposed to become Freeways like the rest of the Interstate Highways within our great State. As it turns out the TCA has horribly mismanaged their role and has squandered these silent taxes paid for by your constituents. Not only are the 73, 241 and 261 still Toll Roads and not Freeways, but the TCA is still over $4.7 BILLION in debt for construction of these roads. This is a dereliction of duty and a travesty for Orange County Taxpayers. By the time the bonds are repaid it will cost 11 Billion dollars - the debt is going in the WRONG direction and will never be paid down or a major taxpayer bailout required negatively affecting Orange County and the State according to a OC Grand Jury report - the TCA carries 64% of all JPA debt in the OC. The TCA recently released a draft a Vision Plan - the TCA is trying to do other non tolled projects and this is serious mission creep. It is time to have the TCA solely focus on paying down the bonds, instead of driving up housing and the cost of business in our County with these empty toll roads and really get traffic moving by freeing the toll roads. We have OCTA and CalTrans there is no need for this redundant wasteful agency. Tax payers deserve better. The TCA sends Hundreds of Millions of Dollars outside of our state on vendor contracts, if they want Grange County Tax payers to be able to afford the ever increasing tolls they need to be more mindful and keep the money in California. Thank you for your time and please do something to stop the hemorrhage to tax payers in our county with these economically discriminating toll roads. Michelle Public Comment From: Tracy, Mariann CM < mtracy@lagu nabeachcity.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 9.45 AM To: Laguna Streets; Public Comment; City Council Cc: Michelle Schumacher Subject: RE: Public Comment for City Council Meetings Dear Les, Thank you for your email. The Councilmembers have received your message. Mariann 7racy Executive Assistant to the City Manager City of Laguna Beach 595 Forest Avenue Laguna Beach, CA 92651 (949) 497-0393 City Hall office Hours: Monday — Thursday 7:39 a.m. — 5:39 p.m. Every other Friday 7:39 a.m. — 4:30 p.m. Closed alternating Fridays Try the Ask La i—a feature on the City's website to find answers to Frequently Asked Questions 2417 or to submit requests for information. From: Laguna Streets Sent: Monday, April 6, 202010:35 PM To: Anh Pub Comment <publiccomment@anaheim.net>; City CouncilcCityCouncil@lagunabeachcity.net> Cc: Michelle Schumacher Subject: Public Comment for City Council Meetings [NOTICE: This message originated outside of City of Laguna Beach -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments unless you are sure the content is safe.] Dear City Council Members and Public Comment Record, In preparation for your Tuesday 7 April meetings I am providing two charts showing an economic analysis of the Transportation Corridor Agency Toll Roads project. The chart data comes from the 2013 TCA Bond Issue document (464 pages), the economic analysis considers the life of each bond issue and maturity in that package from 1995 to 2053. The analysis computes the equivalent annualized amount for every bond, revenue, and expense recorded in that document both present and projected: 0 Bonds Series 1995, 1999, 2013ABC • Bond Debt Service • Developer Impact Fees 0 Operating Expenses i Toll Fee Revenue The first chart shows the total anticipated revenue to cover the actual bond debt service and anticipated expenses for all the bonds. TCA Toll Roads Bored Analysis Annualized Costs Completed Toll Roads �B+QD c $700 Q � $5,00 Al I Revenues a $400 Debt Service V $300 A $200 . . . . . . . . . . Al so Tbo lb lb 1% 1% 1 A Riscai Year The next chart shows the annualized net revenue after expenses in each year. TCA Toll Roads Fond Analysis Annualized Net Costs or Cash Flow [M[Illons] -$60i Fiscal Year The charts show the actual revenue income prior to the bond retirement and refinancing in 2013, and the projected revenues anticipated after 2000. Compare the actual revenues to the projected. The actual net revenues prior to 2013 are a realistic measure of future performance. If you believe the projected revenues are suspect notwithstanding the COVID-19 impact and higher toll rates on total toll revenues, if you believe this bond financing is suspicious, if you N believe this public debt will NEVER sunset, then investigate the TCA. Respectfully Submitted, Les M i klosy Laguna Streets Public Comment From: Pete van Nuys Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 10:27 AM To: Public Comment Subject: TCA: embarrassment under cover of authority TCA's apparent retreat to "Option 22" and the retirement of their overpaid CEO suggest the agency is facing the reality of its chronic failures. From the outset TCA failed to draft a realistic business plan to understand the wants and financial means of its target market to budget responsibly to manage its internal conflicts to live up to its founding mission. Its Board Members have consistently failed to behave like fiscally responsible civic leaders to tell the truth to Orange County taxpayers. Through orchestrated mission creep TCA has morphed over the years. It's one success has been as cash cow for the OCGOP through direct contributions from its myriad vendors, consultants, and contractors. When the spotlight finally shines on TCA and its board members own up to this boondoggle the blemish on Orange County's reputation will rival that of our infamous bankruptcy, our county equivalent to High Speed Rail. -- Pete van Nuys Public Comment From: Pete van Nuys Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 10:27 AM To: Public Comment Subject: TCA: embarrassment under cover of authority TCA's apparent retreat to "Option 22" and the retirement of their overpaid CEO suggest the agency is facing the reality of its chronic failures. From the outset TCA failed to draft a realistic business plan to understand the wants and financial means of its target market to budget responsibly to manage its internal conflicts to live up to its founding mission. Its Board Members have consistently failed to behave like fiscally responsible civic leaders to tell the truth to Orange County taxpayers. Through orchestrated mission creep TCA has morphed over the years. It's one success has been as cash cow for the OCGOP through direct contributions from its myriad vendors, consultants, and contractors. When the spotlight finally shines on TCA and its board members own up to this boondoggle the blemish on Orange County's reputation will rival that of our infamous bankruptcy, our county equivalent to High Speed Rail. -- Pete van Nuys Public Comment From: Pete van Nuys Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 10:31 AM Subject: Public comments, Anaheim City Council: TCA embarrassment under color of authority TCA's apparent retreat to "option 22" and the retirement of their overpaid CEO suggest the agency is facing the reality of its chronic failures. From the outset TCA failed to draft a realistic business plan to understand the wants and financial means of its target market to budget responsibly to manage its internal conflicts to live up to its founding mission. Its Board Members have consistently failed to behave like fiscally responsible civic leaders to tell the truth to orange County taxpayers. Through orchestrated mission creep TCA has morphed over the years. It's one success has been as cash cow for the OCGOP through direct contributions from its myriad vendors, consultants, and contractors. When the spotlight finally shines on TCA and its board members own up to this boondoggle the blemish on Orange County's reputation will rival that of our infamous bankruptcy, our county equivalent to High Speed Rail. Pete van Nuys Exec. Dir. Orange County Bicycle Coalition ECI, LCI, CSI Public Comment From: Brenda Visconti Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 10:31 AM To: Public Comment Subject: Re: Public Comment Received I'm very concerned with the Gardner's who work here where I live..They are working close to our doors and windows without wearing masks, less than six feet as I just saw this morning, I had my door open, not the screen, waiting for a grocery delivery..I am high risk with this virus and have written to you before regarding these Gardner's who work here. They are doing many yards in many different locations an I can't understand why the management who put us at risk as we are a comr)lex with elderly and handicapped residents..please help us stay safe. ..Brenda Visconti knaheim thank you for your time On Thu. Apr 2, 20209 10:00 AM Public Comment <publiccomment t anaheim.net> wrote: The City is in receipt of your public comment. Your comment will be distributed to the City Council for their consideration and made part of the public record of the City Council meeting. THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAWS. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately. Thank you. Public Comment From: Salas, Diana < dsalas@santa-ana.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2420 10:44 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: Public comments, Anaheim City Council: TCA embarrassment under color of authority Good Afternoon, The following communication pertaining to a council meeting, has been received by the City of Santa Ana COTC staff. Kind Regards, Diana Salas I Support Staff Clerk of the Council Office 120 Civic Center Plaza I Santa Ana, CA 92701 714-647-6520 1 dsalas@santa-ana.org https://gcco2.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?u rl=http/3A% 2F r 2Fwww.sa nta- a na.org%2F&a m p;data=02%7C01%7Cpu bl iccom ment%40a naheim. net%7C5a7ebfdl46ao4b47452808d7d b lb3ed2%7C7 4c3739c502a49c68d212bbc30f56f22%7C1%7C0%7C637218782369893117&a mp;sdata=crJ BY72o7d u uCE %2 BTJTYfCWi j8 MJ 84zQ7 n elz0 j2cCls%3 D &a m p; rese rued=0 https:Hgcco2.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ocvote.com%2F&amp;data=02%7Co1f 7Cpu bl iccom ment%40a na heim. net%7C6a7ebfd 146a04b47452808d7d blb3ed2%7C74c3739c5o2a49c68d212bbc30f56f22%7C 1%7C0%7C637218782369893117&amp;sdata=yw8O2L%2FOXK09Cggg101fdaR7O3 Lr09aPJ%2BpbH juSTM k%3D&a m pares erved=0 This e-mail (and attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such, may, therefore, be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. -----Original Message ----- From: Pete van Nuys Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 202010:31 AM Subject: Public comments, Anaheim City Council: TCA embarrassment under color of authority TCA's apparent retreat to "Option 22" and the retirement of their overpaid CEO suggest the agency is facing the reality of its chronic failures. From the outset TCA failed to draft a realistic business plan to understand the wants and financial means of its target market to budget responsibly to manage its internal conflicts to live up to its founding mission. Its Board Members have consistently failed to behave like fiscally responsible civic leaders to tell the truth to orange County taxpayers. Through orchestrated mission creep TCA has morphed over the yea rs. It's one success has been as cash cow for the OCGOP through direct contributions from its myriad vendors, consultants, and contractors. When the spotlight finally shines on TCA and its board members own up to this boondoggle the blemish on orange County's reputation will rival that of our infamous bankruptcy, our county equivalent to High Speed Rail. Pete van Nuys Exec. Dir. orange County Bicycle Coalition ECI, LCI, CSI Public Comment From: Salas, Diana < dsalassanta-ana.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 10:45 AM To: Public Comment Subject: FW: Public Comments for City Council Meeting Good Afternoon, The following communication pertaining to a council meeting, has been received by the City of Santa Ana CGTC staff. Kind Regards, Diana Salas I Support Staff Clerk of the Council Office 120 Civic Center Plaza I Santa Ana, CA 92701 dsalas�santa-ana.orE_ sw 2020 .. ps� LAMM ANA COW Elio S www.santa-ana.orl ItIQ'S !I" Af O V.0 www.ocvote.com This e-mail (acrd attachments, if any) may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such, may, therefore, be subject to public disclosure unless otherwise exempt under the Act. From: Michelle Schumacher Sent: Monday, April 05, 202011:15 PM To: Michelle Schumacher Subject: Public Comments for City Council Meeting Good evening City Council I am writing to you today to ask for your support in reducing a significant tax on all Grange County residents that often times goes unnoticed. Are you aware that the Transportation Corridor Agency (The "TCA") has taxed GC homeowners to the tune of $7065334,000.00 million since the TCA a government Agency was established in 1987. This tax comes in the farm of Development Fees that are assessed on new residential and commercial properties developed or remodeled within Grange County. The TCA was formed in 19$7 with the explicit purpose of constructing the 73, 241 and 261 Toll Roads. At the time that the TCA was established bonds were issued to pay for construction of these the Toll Roads. The promise made by the TCA at the time was that the debt taken on by the TCA for construction of these new Toll Roads would be paid off through a combination of Development Fees and Tolls collected on the roads by drivers who use the roads. 100% of the debt was to be paid off within 30 years and the Toll Roads were supposed to become Freeways like the rest of the Interstate Highways within our great State. As it turns out the TCA has horribly mismanaged their role and has squandered these silent taxes paid for by your constituents. Not only are the 73, 241 and 261 still Toll Roads and not Freeways, but the TCA is still over $4.7 BILLION in debt for construction of these roads. This is a dereliction of duty and a travesty for Orange County Taxpayers. By the time the bonds are repaid it will cost 11 Billion dollars - the debt is going in the WRONG direction and will never be paid down or a major taxpayer bailout required negatively affecting Orange County and the State according to a OC Grand Jury report - the TCA carries 64% of all JPA debt in the OC. The TCA recently released a draft a vision Plan - the TCA is trying to do other non tolled projects and this is serious mission creep. It is time to have the TCA solely focus on paying down the bonds, instead of driving up housing and the cost of business in our County with these empty toll roads and really get traffic moving by freeing the toll roads. We have OCTA and CalTrans there is no need for this redundant wasteful agency. Tax payers deserve better. The TCA sends Hundreds of Millions of Dollars outside of our state on vendor contracts, if they want Orange County Tax payers to be able to afford the ever increasing tolls they need to be more mindful and keep the money in California. Thank you for your time and please do something to stop the hemorrhage to tax payers in our county with these economically discriminating toll roads. Michelle item # `=- 1 . Distributed to majority of city Council within Jennifer L. Hall 72 hourgs of . From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mayor and City Council, Theresa Bass Tuesday, April 7, 2020 1:02 PM Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jordan Brandman; Trevor O'Neil; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Denise Barnes; Stephen Faessel Justin Clover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; daniel@presidiosc.com; Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Robert Fabela; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Jennifer L. Hall; Lauren Cold Public Comments - Council Meeting April 7, 2020 (2nd Distribution) Pu b l i cCo m me ntCC Mo4o720_ D i stri b utedo4O720_2. pdf Attached is one (1) public comment received as of 1:00 pm, April 7, 2020 for council consideration. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Theresa Theresa Bass, CMC City Clerk City of Anahelm 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. #217 Anaheim, CA 92505 Email: tb ass anaheim. net Phone: (714) 765-5166 1 Fax: (714) 765-4105 Public Comment From: Lauren Gold Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 12:41 PM To: Public Comment Subject: From Linda Newby As we go through this brave new world of rules and restrictions for public safety, I want to complement the staff and services of the City of Anaheim. Be grateful that we all have police, fire, community service, public utilities and neighborhood services working as hard as they can. The lights are on, the water is running and the street services are still being kept up beautifully. In my experience, Anaheim Anytime has been 100% up to their high standards of quickly resolving issues. Our public library has set a platinum standard for the nation of the creative ways our library still can serve those in need of entertainment and a great book or video. Our hard working nonprofits like the Anaheim Family YMCA and Boys and Girls Club are ensuring that children are fed through our fabulous Anaheim Community Foundation and a lot of caring. Our entire city team is to be commended wholeheartedly. We should not take for granted that what we expect to be normally done takes an extraordinary amount of commitment to get done during challenging times. item # Distributed to M majority of City Council rthin r � �,� Jennifer L. Hal! 72 hours of ---- ._ meeting. . From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mayor and City Council, Theresa Bass Tuesday, April 7, 2020 3:06 PM Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Jordan Brandman; Trevor O'Neil; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Denise Barnes; Stephen Faessel Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; daniel@presidiosc.com; Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Robert Fabela; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Jennifer L. Hall Public Comments - Council Meeting April 7, 2020 (3rd Distribution) P u b l i cCo m m e ntCC M 040720_D i stri b uted04072 0_3 . pdf Attached are public comments (5 emails) received as of 3:00 pm, April 7, 2020 for council consideration. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Theresa Theresa Bass, CMC City Clerk City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Blvd #217 Anaheim, CA 92805 Email: tb ass anaheim. net Phone: (714) 765-5166 1 Fax: (714) 765-4105 Public Comment From: Tatiana Munoz Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 2:23 PM To: Public Comment Subject: Corona Virus Mask Hello, Good Afternoon I would like Anaheim City to implement a city wide mandate to wear mask or some type of coverage for nose, mouth. we know asymptomatic can also spread the virus, I think it would help slow down the spread along with the measures already placed. I thank you for all the hard work you. Anaheim, Resident Tatiana Munoz Public Comment From: John Machiaverna <jmac@theboysandgirlsclub.org 3 Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 2:20 PM To: Public Comment Cc: Harry Sidhu; sfaessel@anheim.net; Lucille Kring, Trevor O'Neil; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; John Machiaverna Subject: Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Anaheim -Cypress Honorable Mayor Harry Sidhu, Anaheim Council Members and City Staff, Although i no longer live in the city of Anaheim my heart will always be there. I applaud our city leaders and staff for great leadership and guidance going through what will surely be known as one of the most difficult times in our country's history. We are thankful for the swift decisions that you have made to protect the population and ensure that even our most impacted families in our community will continue to receive services. Although at the present time the Boys & Girls Clubs are not able to serve children we are currently running grab and go food distributions three days a week. In our first two weeks we reached 400 families touching close to 2000 individuals delivering precooked meals, canned goods, nonperishable food items and over 3000 pounds of pasta. We have collaborated with The Raise Foundation, Caterinafs Club and Influence Church. They have all provided food and meals to families that need our help now more than ever. I am happy to inform you that the on July 1, 2020 the Main Clubhouse in Anaheim at Manzanita Park will officially become an accredited Family Resource Center bringing more organizations together providing greater services in the 92501 and surrounding neighborhoods. Thank you for keeping our community safe and providing the resources to The Boys & Girls Clubs of Anaheim assuring we can continue offering high quality programs to our children and their families. Sincerely, John Machiaverna CEO The Boys Girls Clubs of Greater Anaheim -Cypress Public Comment From: Carla Palasigui Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 2:15 PM To: Public Comment Subject: Request to freeze rent increase for Anaheim Attachments: imagel jpeg; ATT00001.txt Hello, Could we request to freeze rent increase for residents in Anaheim at least for a year similar to Las Angeles? A similar request has been posted on your FB page today: FV 'c s� cc = c � C d toO tG3 C� N FV Public Comment From: Jerry Collamer Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 1:44 PM To: Public Comment Subject: time to abolish TCA - NOW! Dear Council, I'm a San Clemente resident. OC resident for 22 -years. For 22 -years we've all experienced the ineptitude of TCA. Their swelling indebtedness. Their lies. Their folly, as a so-called transportation -reducer, when in fact, TCA's 51 -miles of toll roads literally brought freeway congestion to OC, as the venue for accessing open space for south county's master planned development. More development = More traffic. Ironically, TCA limits its ridership through Congestion Pricing? When commuters need traffic relief the most, during peak hours, TCA shuts the door. What relief? The 73 toll road has failed financially from Day -1. This is fact, no matter how TCA cooks their books. The 241, is less of a failure, only because TCA rejiggered their books, recognizing the 73's financial -success -over -promise would never happen, so, TCA lowered the financial bar for the 241. Hence, the 241 became TCA's poster child for success. Basically, just more scarp bookkeeping at TCA. Today, TCA has given -up on their 2 -decade dream / folly of a 241 -South Extension, from Oso Parkway south, DIRECTLY th rough ...San Clemente? Literally, through the middle of San Clemente. Down San Clemente"s throat. Does any rational citizen, from any city in OC, or any city, anywhere in the world, think; paving an underperforming toll road, through the middle of anyone's town, is rational? No. It's absurd. It's abusive. It's stupid. Basically, TCA is crazy. Yet for 2 -decades, TCA has threatened, bullied, panicked, tormented San Clemente's citizenry through TCA's blind, non- stop arrogance. TCA should be immediately terminated. Its Headquarter doors bolted shut, turning TCA's scant remaining services over to OCTA. There is no reason, for TCA going forward. None. And I haven't even mentioned TCA's elephant in the room: its out of control, ballooning debt load, to the 10's of Billions and growing exponentially. Abolish TCA Now. End the madness. Bring sanity back to OC's traffic relief dilemma by Abolishing TCA Now, putting OC traffic solutions into the hands of experts. Not TCA. Abolishing TCA is decades overdue. Do it now, for the good of OC. Thank you, Jerry Collamer San Clemente Ca 92672 Public Comment From: Kenneth Batiste Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 2:59 PM To: Public Comment Subject: april 7 comments Given honor to God and all of the members of the council that are serving God, Our world, our nation, are going through very uncertain times where the results are crucial and uncertain times. We will get through this crisis because we trust in God ,we trust not trusting in our federal or local government. Again our city council has shown how there is no limit to the corruption this mayor and his merry people will commit. This Mayor never missed an opportunity to keep on robbing the residents of Anaheim even in a time of crisis. So because of this I am giving the mayor the name of "Harry robbing the hood" along with his band of merry men and "little John " is Faessel, with Iring, O'Neil, and Brandon. They will do whatever this mayor want or tell them to do, just like when the mayor on a hot mic when they thought it was off telling Faessel how to vote. That right Council Faessel lost a lot of respect from the people of people who learn about this telling sign that Faessel is bought and pay for. For the money and not the residents. They have done it again last week when the Newsome from the state send our taxes money to help with this corona emergency. Out of 15 million dollars he and his merry men gave another private RESORT company 6.5 million to hold on to until this corona situation is over. While the convention center employees go unpay along with the employees of hotels that are part of the resort community that don't belong to Disney. 6 Y2 million to a company that fought measure L the living wage against putting money into employees hands for them and theirs childrens. That in the past i believe even contribute to the campaigns of some of the present city council. What was the big HURRY Harry that only after 15 hours you call a emergency meeting to hurry and wait. That couldn't wait for the regular meeting 5 days later to discuss what should be done and given the council less than 1 day to read. Corrupution at it best is quick and fast before people and this company does nothing really for the residents but the Resort community of Disney that paid 52.4 billion in 2017 for Fox. Next he will give SOAR 10 million because they are going broke also without normal stream of Disney money, Residents pay attention because maybe because we don't pay attention this is happening. We are going through a world problem and is HOMELESSNESS a world problem and don't you think when they cry out to God he tell them revenges are mine. Sports people we trusted that ours people in government where doing the right thing and now we find they only were pretending to be handling the problem. The mayor gave 250 thousands to Anaheim first his private non profit of chamber of congress, Next he gove the chamber of congress 450 thousands dollars. Next he gave the police union president a 17 % raise paid for by the residents of Anaheim which nearly cost about 400 thousands and now he giving visit Anaheim 6 1/2 million. Item # � • Distributed to majority of City Council within Public Comment 72 hours o n t, r-neetin. From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mayor and Council, Jennifer L. Hall on behalf of Public Comment Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:00 PM Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes (DBarnes@anaheim.net); 'Jordan Brandman'; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; Daniel Fierro (daniel@presidiosc.com); Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; 'Arianna Barrios'; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward-; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Robert Fabela; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Mike Lyster; Theresa Bass Phone Comment - Pam Holsinger Pam Holsinger provided a comment by phone on Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 4:55 P.M., as follows: Any funding coming to the City to address current issues should go to the people to help with desperate situations and not be provided to special interests. Ms. Holsinger did not provide any contact information. Sincerely, jenniferf. HaCC cmc As s1S taint Cit T Clerk Office of the City Clerk City of Anaheiin 714-765-5166 Item # ak . Distributed to majority of City Council within Public Comment 72 hours meeting. From: Jennifer L. Hall on behalf of Public Comment Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 6:15 PM To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; 'Jordan Brandman'; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil Cc: Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; Daniel Fierro (daniel@presidiosc.com); Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; 'Arianna Barrios'; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Robert Fabela; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Mike Lyster; Theresa Bass Subject: FW: Public Comments for April 7th,2020 Spm From: Annemarie Randle-Trejo Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 5:14 PM To: Public Comment <publiccomment@anaheim.net> Subject: Public Comments for April 7th,20205pm Mayor Sidhu and Council Memebrs, My name is Annemarie Randle-Trejo school board trustee for the Anaheim Union High School District. First and foremost while I am grateful for the opportunity to post remarks to all of you I find it difficult This method t is unable to truly relay or emote a true essence of the message from constituents. Communication is always key and while we may not like some remarks from citizens it is their right to address the council. I urge you all to allow the public to call in or at the very least have the clerk read the comments. This would add transparency and allow those listening in to hear and understand public views. Please consider these alternatives. It was my understanding at the last council meeting many constituents Were very concerned or skeptical of the 6,5 million that was earmarked for advertising. while we are all understanding that sacrifices and hard decisions have to be made to aide the community. Many do not understand or think it appropriate (including me) at this time to pay money to advertise. I gave you my remarks for the prior meeting and feel all of those communications from the prior meeting should be posted as well.. Many people in the community are struggling and are waiting in line for food. I think you can draw the parallel. I would also like to say that the efforts of the Anaheim Union High School district to feed our families has been on going and steadfast. We have some days given out over 11,000 meals per day. We have several sites across the city and our food service employees are our heroes as well. I also need to point out the efforts of the AUHSD . we've been promoting the CENSUS 2020 since last year. I am pleased to hear that the city numbers are promising and would life to acknowledge and thank the hard work of our AUHSD staff and community partners. If we all work together we can receive the needed dollars and services for the entire Anaheim community. Thank you item # 0`1l _. Distributed to majority of City Council within Public Comment 72 houro of `� `_?. ��_ meeting. From: Jennifer L. Hall on behalf of Public Comment Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 8:13 PM To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; 'Jordan Brandman'; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil Cc: Justin Glover; Salvador Figueroa; Nam Bartash; Amanda Edinger; Daniel Fierro (daniel@presidiosc.com); Samantha Saenz; Annie Mezzacappa; 'Arianna Barrios'; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Sarah Bartczak; Marisol Ramirez; Chris Zapata; Gregory Garcia; David Belmer; Robert Fabela; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Mike Lyster; Theresa Bass Subject: FW: Public Comment Received From: Brenda Visconti Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 8:11 PM To: Public Comment <publiccomment@anaheim.net> Subject: Re: Public Comment Received Thank you so much for your time in helping to relieve our fears during this horrid time.. I've just heard on the radio that O.C. has just ordered 10,000 masks..Will a percentage of these be allotted for residents who are at risk, who reside here, otherwise on social security an dissability?? I believe even two a month would be beneficial for seniors as they could get most of their errands done in those two days they would have their masks..giving them out at the grocery stores they shop would be a win win situation for both the protection of the person an the store..if we are to help our medical people than we must keep people healthy..we who cannot afford shopping on line an delivery, MUST go out, especially if we live alone as I do, whereby the grocery store ... it's the only place I absolutely have to go to... Please think on this and let me know how this will be handled so I may reassure those around..thank you again for your time an effort on helping this city through what I believe is it's worst time in history..bless you all Brenda Visconti On Tue, Apr 7, 2020, 10:31 AM Public Comment <i.-)ubliccomment: � i anaheim.net> wrote: The City is in receipt of your public comment. Your comment will be distributed to the City Council for their consideration and made part of the public record of the City Council meeting. THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAWS. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately. Thank you.