Public Comments Received 06/23/2020 Council MeetingFrom:
To: Public Comment
Cc:
Subject: Closed Session Comment for June 23 Anaheim Council Meeting
Date: Saturday, June 20, 2020 4:47:34 PM
Attachments: Closed Session Comment,pdf
Attached Closed Session Comment,
Anaheim City Council Closed Session Comments, June 23, 2020,
VIA EMAIL TO. publiecomment(&,anaheim.net
FROM: Home Owners Maintaining our Environment
The corrupt Anaheim Council has little concern for the people of Anaheim.
?-
As the City of Anaheim faces BANKRUPTCY, the council only actions in
order to postpone the eventuality of BANKRUPTCY are to reduce city workers
that provides needed services to the residents of Anaheim.
There are, however, real options available to both increase services to
Anaheim citizens while reducing costs. These would be instead of the council's
plans to lay off workers. These real options are being used presently by over
twenty other Orange County cities that have improved services while significantly
reducing costs. Unfortunately, the Anaheim council members concerns are for
themselves, not for the people of Anaheim. Therefore, they will never consider
doing for Anaheim what the many other OC cities have accomplished.
It is well known that the Anaheim Police and the Anaheim fire Departments
are the worst in Orange County and are the most expensive per capita.
The City of Anaheim can greatly improve its Police service to the higher level
of other OC cities and save up to $40 million a year in doing so.
The City of Anaheim can greatly improve its fire services to the higher level
of other OC cities and save up to $15 million a year in doing so.
Over twenty other OC cities use the Orange County Sheriff Department for
police services and the Orange County Fire Authority for fire services at huge
increases in services with significant reductions in cost.
The BIG PROBLEM is that the members of the Anaheim City Council
receives up to $80,000 a year in political support from the Anaheim Police and Fire
Unions (AKA Associations). They would never receive that money if the OC
Sheriff and Fire Authority provide the services to the residents of Anaheim.
THE ANAHEIM COUNCIL MEMBERS WILL ALWAYS DECIDE TO
RECEIVE THE $80.000 FOR THEMSELVES, AND LET ANAHEIM GO
BANKRUPT, INSTEAD OF SAVING ANAHEIM $55 MILLION A YEAR,
From:
To:
Public Comment
Cc:
Subject:
Public Agenda Comment June 23 meeting
Date:
Thursday, June 18, 2020 10:52:26 PM
Attachments:
Agenda Comments June 23.pd
Attached Agenda Public Comment for June 23 Anaheim Council Meeting.
It is noticed that hundreds of duplicate letters are being sent in for public comments
by Disneyland puppet organizations. The reasons why appears to be in order to keep
the few good comments from ever being read.
Also interesting is that thousands of Disneyland workers, who are collecting
unemployment benefits more than their Disneyland slave pay of under $15 per hour,
do not want to return to work at Disneyland. They are using the danger of cool D-1 9
as an excuse.
The City of Anaheim, the Disneyland puppet organizations, and Disneyland labor
unions, are giving out false information that the $600 federal bonus unemployment
pay will stop at the end of July (see Anaheim Blog article, reopening of Disneyland)..
That information is incorrect. The $600 a week extra unemployment plus the CA
State amounts are for the full 39 weeks.
Anaheim wants the hotel taxes and the union do not collect union dues with
Disneyland closed. But the extra $600 a week is equal to 40 hours at $15 an hour,
more than the many Disney workers' base pay.
Anaheim Council Public Comments, June 23, 2020, Agenda Items #1, #19, & #209
4D
VIA EMAIL TO: publiecommentnaanaheimnet
FROM: Home Owners Maintaining our Environment
the corrupt Anaheim City Council is continuing deception of Anaheim
residents. Following items must be acknowledged in order to prevent bankruptcy:
1. As the budget agenda, items #1, #19, & #20 indicate, Anaheim is not in a
fiscal emergency, ANAHEIM IS PENDING BANKRUPTCY
2. The city council is attempting to falsely indicate that Anaheim
BANKRUPTCY is caused only by the COVID-19 situation. The primary
causes are Anaheim's city owned property. and rebate giveaways to
financially benefit council members*
"IV
3. The two options Anaheim has to avoid BANKRUPTCY is to have a gate tax
of 5% on Disneyland, and other Anaheim attractions, or turn Anaheim into
the DRUG CAPITAL of Southern California by allowing up to twenty
taxable MARIJUANA OUTLETS in Anaheim.
4. At the June 9, 2020 council meeting, Mayor Sidhu and Council members
Kring and Brandman, all voted ' YES on a proposal to allow the taxable
MARIJUANA OUTLETS in Anaheim.
5. Mayor Sidhu 22 year-old son who lives with him is supposed to be an expert
on drug usage and has connections with major drug dealers that could
finance the installation of twenty MARIJUANA OUTLETS in Anaheim.
6. Much later at the June 9, 2020 meeting, Mayor Sidhu illegally ordered the
City Clerk to change one of his agenda item votes. The City Clerk would be
committing a crime should that change appears on the meeting minutes.
7. At the Anaheim Hills Fourth of July parade prior to the Last Anaheim
council election, Sidhu illegally wore the uniform of an US ARMY OFFICER
(for financial gain) and rode in an open military vehicle. The sponsors of the
parade, the Disneyland Chamber of Commerce (AKA Anaheim), falsely
made known that Sidhu was a helicopter pilot in the First Gulf War. It is
estimated that hundreds of Anaheim Hills voters, who now know that Sidhu
never served in the military, would like to change their votes for mayor.
*Many present and past Anaheim councilmembers have questionable
increases in their personal wealth from serving on the Anaheim City Council.
Examples are Tom Tait with his promoting of the $500 million California
Adventure rebate to Disneyland, and Sidhu in the 2012 $156 million hotel rebate,
Public Comments Distributed to the Anaheim City Council
June 23, 2020 Council Meeting
Updated 3:00 P.M. —Wednesday, June 24, 2020
From:
To:
Public Comment
Cc:
Subject:
Public Agenda Comment June 23 meeting
Date:
Thursday, June 18, 2020 10:52:26 PM
Attachments:
Agenda Comments June 23.pd
Attached Agenda Public Comment for June 23 Anaheim Council Meeting.
It is noticed that hundreds of duplicate letters are being sent in for public comments
by Disneyland puppet organizations. The reasons why appears to be in order to keep
the few good comments from ever being read.
Also interesting is that thousands of Disneyland workers, who are collecting
unemployment benefits more than their Disneyland slave pay of under $15 per hour,
do not want to return to work at Disneyland. They are using the danger of cool D-1 9
as an excuse.
The City of Anaheim, the Disneyland puppet organizations, and Disneyland labor
unions, are giving out false information that the $600 federal bonus unemployment
pay will stop at the end of July (see Anaheim Blog article, reopening of Disneyland)..
That information is incorrect. The $600 a week extra unemployment plus the CA
State amounts are for the full 39 weeks.
Anaheim wants the hotel taxes and the union do not collect union dues with
Disneyland closed. But the extra $600 a week is equal to 40 hours at $15 an hour,
more than the many Disney workers' base pay.
Anaheim Council Public Comments, June 23, 2020, Agenda Items #1, #19, & #209
4D
VIA EMAIL TO: publiecommentnaanaheimnet
FROM: Home Owners Maintaining our Environment
the corrupt Anaheim City Council is continuing deception of Anaheim
residents. Following items must be acknowledged in order to prevent bankruptcy:
1. As the budget agenda, items #1, #19, & #20 indicate, Anaheim is not in a
fiscal emergency, ANAHEIM IS PENDING BANKRUPTCY
2. The city council is attempting to falsely indicate that Anaheim
BANKRUPTCY is caused only by the COVID-19 situation. The primary
causes are Anaheim's city owned property. and rebate giveaways to
financially benefit council members*
"IV
3. The two options Anaheim has to avoid BANKRUPTCY is to have a gate tax
of 5% on Disneyland, and other Anaheim attractions, or turn Anaheim into
the DRUG CAPITAL of Southern California by allowing up to twenty
taxable MARIJUANA OUTLETS in Anaheim.
4. At the June 9, 2020 council meeting, Mayor Sidhu and Council members
Kring and Brandman, all voted ' YES on a proposal to allow the taxable
MARIJUANA OUTLETS in Anaheim.
5. Mayor Sidhu 22 year-old son who lives with him is supposed to be an expert
on drug usage and has connections with major drug dealers that could
finance the installation of twenty MARIJUANA OUTLETS in Anaheim.
6. Much later at the June 9, 2020 meeting, Mayor Sidhu illegally ordered the
City Clerk to change one of his agenda item votes. The City Clerk would be
committing a crime should that change appears on the meeting minutes.
7. At the Anaheim Hills Fourth of July parade prior to the Last Anaheim
council election, Sidhu illegally wore the uniform of an US ARMY OFFICER
(for financial gain) and rode in an open military vehicle. The sponsors of the
parade, the Disneyland Chamber of Commerce (AKA Anaheim), falsely
made known that Sidhu was a helicopter pilot in the First Gulf War. It is
estimated that hundreds of Anaheim Hills voters, who now know that Sidhu
never served in the military, would like to change their votes for mayor.
*Many present and past Anaheim councilmembers have questionable
increases in their personal wealth from serving on the Anaheim City Council.
Examples are Tom Tait with his promoting of the $500 million California
Adventure rebate to Disneyland, and Sidhu in the 2012 $156 million hotel rebate,
From:
To: Public Comment
Subject: COVID Disney reopening concerns
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 3:12:24 PM
Dear Council members,
Please, hear me. I have worked for Disney for over ten years. I truly enjoy what I do but I genuinely feel that Disney is attempting to open
much too soon considering everything. If the notice on their website tells guests that there is an inherent risk when visiting the park for a
day or two, what does that mean for me being there in the same environment for 40 hours a week? Here are a few of my concerns
specifically:
How do I social distance between Parking to get to the property?
We are crammed into small busses and driven 10 minutes then hop onto a Backstage shuttle to location across the entire park (some open
air, some not).
How will Security check my bag after touching everyone who came before me?
I then open the door, that everyone else touches repeatedly.
Clocking in on shared indoor computer. Getting multiple assignments throughout the day on the same computer
We change positions every 30 minutes or less. How will I rotate positions with everything we touch
We share ride consoles with buttons that must be held with 10, 20, or 30 people in a day
We Open gates touched by multiple people
We share Intercoms that are held up to the ear and face multiple times in a position and countless throughout the day
How will I evacuate a guest off of an attraction while social distancing when it breaks down
How do a Check restraints from six feet away, some ride don't even have six feet available if the Cast member tried
How do I accurately check someone's height to verify that they meet the requirements from six feet away
If I'm closer and check their height and they sneeze or cough on me (this happens ALOT)
When guest becomes upset that their child too short or some other event and droplets fall in my eyes from their mouths
How do I help a passed out guest or cast member form 6 feet away
How do I Call 911
The kitchens are extremely Close quarters
The stores are small enclosed spaces
Some backstage offices that I would be required to enter are the size of a closet
How do I account and protect myself for my fellow cast member's health choices when they not on property and they don't take the
virus seriously
How will I Take a break in an undersized break room
Some Indoors
Some Outdoors
Both impossible to get 6 feet away when people will not be wearing masks at that time
How many masks will I be given in a day when working outdoors and sweating profusely in the summer
Before we closed there was an Oversight on hand washing most people still weren't washing their hands
When a guest sees my fear and coughs intentionally in my face
My life will be put in continuous danger over the guest's 3 minutes of enjoyment on a ride
Tell me,
When I feel the weight of symptoms become heavy on me
Tell me,
When I'm given a test to find this deadly crowned demon
Tell me,
When results show LVID positive
Tell me,
When the hospital admits me
Tell me,
When I see my family for the last time
Tell me,
When I'm moved to the crowded ICU
Tell me,
When there aren't enough ventilators
Tell me,
When my lungs are scarred permanently
Tell me,.
When the clots turn fatal
Tell me,
When medical measures weren't enough
Tell me,
When my family can't be there in my final breaths
Tell me,
Who will attend my funeral
Tell me,
Who will take care of my children
Tell me,
Who will support my spouse
Tell me,
Who will comfort my parents
Tell me,
What good is money if I'm dead
Sincerely,
A concerned Cast Member
From:
Trac
To:
Gregory Garcia; Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor)
Subject:
Protections for the Residents of Anaheim
Date:
Wednesday, June 17, 2020 7:46:36 PM
Mayhor Sidhu, City Manager Greg Garcia and Councilmembers,
I am appalled at the actions of the Orange County Board of Supervisors in order to open businesses more quickly and I am
looking for the City of Anaheim to step in.
We have increasing numbers of COVID-19 infections in Anaheim and no signs of that turning around just yet. We've seen
what is happening in other areas where restrictions have been lifted prematurely. The fact that Orange County Supervisors
have decided to do away with the requirement to wear masks is disgusting. I'd like to know what Anaheim is doing to protect
its residents?
Until a vaccine or a cure for COVID-19 is discovered, cloth face masks are the most important tool we
currently have to fight the pandemic. This is a small sacrifice to make for the greater good. Unless
individuals have health conditions that don't allow them to easily wear a mask, folks should be required to
wear a mask anytime they are out in public -- relying on people to do the right thing obviously isn't
working.
At this time, it seems that the City of Anaheim has chosen to be a follower when it comes to COVID-19 response. A city
of our size, with the tourism we see in our city... "following" is unacceptable. The City of Irvine has done their part to
protect their residents -- what is the City of Anaheim doing to protect us?
Orange County deserves better. Anaheim deserves better.
Tracy Noiazco - Anaheim Resident
- Mobile
From: Edgar Arellan
To: MTakayusaPanaheim. net; Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno;
Lucille Kring; Trevor 0"Neil; AHAinfo@)anaheim.net
Subject: More affordable housing in Anaheim
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 5:00:24 AM
Attachments: image.png
Please bring up methods in which Anaheim can more intentionally build housing that is affordable, rather than
"attainable" for discussion tomorrow.
Last week, 2 more luxury above average income "attainable" projects were approved without any dedicated
affordable housing allocation within approved project. Both project developers instead "contributed" to a
temporary senior housing assistance program rather than committing to provide affordable housing. Why is this
loophole being upheld as satisfactory to meet affordable housing requirements?
Temporary housing assistance for the elderly does not equal affordable housing. This is especially true if elders
cannot find affordable housing to further stretch their temporary housing assistance.
The current RHNA housing allocation for above moderate income is double that which is remaining for all the
other income categories combined. Do something to satisfy the remaining 2906 units. You are allowing the rate
of luxury housing to outpace the housing needs of local Anaheim residents by more than 2 times .
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner - District 2
Low In r7omo
Above,
Mo- 40( a to
in N N
4TInAfflolow
TOTAL
9107
RH NA
CUN*W" F,er mkta
ft - rift IltsmW-fove
r1VV
01twil,11111110
1000M
NkwAgan
Ob)octhv 1"ued
Issued, RN"
CA"gory
kw I. -Year
!o -r 9-Y"r 20119
2014-20-19 Nlmahm
Object1vto
Pisnnft
Ptannhng Joufforn yowl
16 years) (2 yolus to
12 years to
P*ftd
Pedod
04410)
C0111PNIVI
Wry Low
Inc0aw
12
-1 4;1
124
Low In r7omo
Above,
Mo- 40( a to
in N N
4TInAfflolow
TOTAL
9107
367
1 C
1
1038
36
0
so
3 5 'r -1
2 510 1 0 &- 946
5.702 units 4, 158 un Its 1,001 U111ts
7t182 14 461,1 0 310P
7.477 imll- 20"t UM1616 246 units
From: Edgar Arellano
To: Public Comment; Harry Siclhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Will you commit to support Anaheim resident housing needs?
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 12:57:50 AM
Attachments: image.png
Hello councilmembers,
Why are you approving even more luxury (aka "attainable") housing when we are over bloated with above
moderate income housing?
It is shameful that this council, mayor, and city manager would approve of the projects this past tuesday
without demanding more affordable housing.
The current RHNA housing allocation for above moderate income is double that which is remaining for all the
other income categories combined. Do something to satisfy the remaining 2906 unit. You are allowing the rate
of luxury housing outpace the housing needs of local Anaheim residents by more than 2 times.
Do Better,
Low 1111.1-04TIA-)
RNNA
Guartkniod,
Permkts
B-ring
Romair*V
111'C'mm
AllcaWo- n
0 b'- 4
Wued
Issued RMA
--kauft-
. od
Calnery,
k -K O-YOOF
for 8-yow
201.9
204-2019 A110091M
01b)"ClIve
Plonning
01wrft'(2
lemontyllw)
;16 V"rs) VWS to
(2 y"I
13 31 -UO
PS MCA
Porto
conv* CO
COMPWO)
Wry LOW
In
1 256
5 3
4"3
124 1326.
I..
� 11
Low 1111.1-04TIA-)
9C-? )6- 7
10
1 ? 1 7$6
modt"I aft
1038 36
0
50 96.8
14
Incoll-my
Above
Moderate
2 501
946
71182 0,681)
13 31 -UO
TOTAL
5^70.2 tin Its 4,3518 unli-s
1,001 units
70477tinlI .iunits".
246 units
From: Edgar Arellano
To: MTakayusaC@anaheim.net; Public Comment ' ; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Trevor il; -0"N AHAinfo@anaheim.net
-eli -
Subject: Re: More affordable housing in Anaheim
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 5:19:44 PM
Attachments: image.png
They are discussing having virtual meetings right now. However, they did not acknowledge my public comment.
How do they intend to hold a public comment during virtual meetings when they aren't acknowledging comments
right now.
On Wed,, Jun 17 2020 5:00 AM Edgar Arellano wrote:
Please bring up methods in which Anaheim can more intentionally build housing that is affordable, rather than
"attainable" for discussion tomorrow.
Last week, 2 more luxury above average income "attainable" projects were approved without any dedicated
affordable housing allocation within approved project. Both project developers instead "contributed" to a
temporary senior housing assistance program rather than committing to provide affordable housing. Why is this
loophole being upheld as satisfactory to meet affordable housing requirements?
Temporary housing assistance for the elderly does not equal affordable housing. This is especially true if elders
cannot find affordable housing to further stretch their temporary housing assistance.
The current RHNA housing allocation for above moderate income is double that which is remaining for all the
other income categories combined. Do something to satisfy the remaining 2906 units. You are allowing the rate
of luxury housing to outpace the housing needs of local Anaheim residents by more than 2 times .
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner - District 2
RNNA
Q"ttlftd
po
p0mits
Rs"InIng
Rvfvwtlul�u
lncoin4 AMOC-40on
0
I"6
wd
ftsu*d
RHNA
0 ulondftd
Category lof year
for 6-Yoor
2019
2014-2019
All"Im,
ObWi iv P,o
Planning
Plawome
1-c- Uffe- "t VW)
16 yllmrs)
(2 VMS to
(2 yeam to
POrlad
P-oriod
wmowto)
COMPF-6141
Valy LOW
1256
83
41
124 1.132
Ind
007
367
.10
121 786
FA 14,F 41 Ii +-4
1x036
36
0
IQ me ��.
1
Ab*v*j
to a JI't a I a
3,872
948
11162 (4,6611 �31 31,
Ire
TOTAL.
5,702- units
4.358 w-11tv,
1+001 Un"s
TATI unlfttC21,9�06 un s" 2" unkb
From: Edgar Arellano
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Anaheim leadership failure
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 6:40:37 AM
Why are so many city department leads, as well as city officials like yourselves, refusing to
support anti -racist work.?
Are you afraid to publicly take a stand against white supremacy.?
Anaheim became more dangerous for long time locals due to your decisions to continue
approving monies to be spent on police equipment this past City Council meeting.
Why does the Library look like a residual warzone with those barricades? You are forcing
people to walk/roll on the road and gutter along the Santa Ana side of the Police department
due to the same barricade equipment. This is a violation of the ADA, and yet more evidence
that you'd sacrifice public safety to be ready to uphold some faux law & order.
Several community members are documenting instances where city leaders have refused to
either acknowledge the structure of white supremacy that pervades our city, we've notice that
they also refuse to take active steps to begin dismantling it. There needs to be more action to
address the lack of equity in our current Anaheim leadership. The current leaders are failing
and the lack of confidence grows with your refusal to listen to constituent concerns.
Do better,
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner, District 2
From: Edgar Arellano
To: Public Comment; Harr) Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Lucille Krin- ; lose
Moreno; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Anaheim police state
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2020 5:13:03 PM
Rode my bike past Anaheim Central Public Library and noticed that the barriers are still up,
the same ones the city & PD used to create an unnecessary buffer zone around the library &
PD station.
It not only looks tacky, ridiculous, militarized, and generally unfriendly, it also violates ADA
laws by blocking access to the sidewalk. Why is our PD blatantly violating the law to uphold a
faux sense of law & order around the PD bldg?
you are denying the public to safely use the sidewalk to uphold the safety of a building.
Do better
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner
District 2
From: Cameo Rose
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Tremor o"Neil
Subject: Malcolm Harsch/ Robert Fuller
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 10:16:40 AM
I'm asking you to use whatever power you have to bring attention, investigation and justice
for the heinous deaths of Malcolm Harsch and Robert Fuller.
These men did not know each other. They lived in different towns. Both of them were found
HUNG FROM A TREE, ten days apart, May 31, 2020 and then June 10, 2020.
They were hung from a tree til they died, and the sheriffs department found " no foul play".
The story was put in a file cabinet and filed away.
The families have been trying to draw attention to their cases.
This was a racist, hate crime. Not a person that was under arrest and "accidentally" killed.
These were two men that were heinously and horribly killed like it's 1940. They were
tortured and killed because of the color of their skin. As simple as that.
These men deserve justice. The murderers need to be caught. What if this was your child?
These people could kill again. Investigations need to be opened for both cases before there
is another person found hung from a tree.
With murders like this taking place, California needs overhaul in their police, sheriff, and
justice system. Don't tell me you understand, and change takes time. Californians are being
hung from trees, this is an EMERGENCY.
WE NEED CHANGE NOW.
You will be held accountable, whether you do something or nothing. YOU now know about
these crimes, and you have power to DO SOMETHING. I've done what I can, I TOLD YOU,
now you do what YOU can.
Concerned citizen,
Mrs. Maldonado
Stockton, CA 05205
From: Scarlette Almero
To: Public Comment
Subject: Re: Automatic reply: Change for City of Anaheim
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:22:46 AM
Mayor ..City Council
I submitted a comment to the city council..June 9 2020 -talking about recommendations where
to start in ALL this social upheaval / unrest..I mentioned
Retraining police ... making sure our city is safe..& that schools are safe..& ALL STUDENTS
have the same opportunity to learn to have a productive future -as a start to bring social
JUSTICE & EQUALITY to ANAHEIM..I do not know how I could forget OUR
HOMELESS.Ahis SADLY is a major problem in Anaheim..many need health
Services both medical & mental -as well as access to good nutrition & adequate housing ... Here
is the BOTTOM LINE Anaheim City Council..
When EACH ANAHEIM RESIDENT HAS
ADEQUATE.. FOOD.. CLOTHING.. S H ELTER.. EDUCATION & A JOB.Ahen this truly will
be a TERRIFIC CITY TO LIVE..WORK& PLAY IN..AS OUR CITY LEADERS ..IT IS UP
TO YOU TO ENACT POLICIES& LEAD BY EXAMPLE TO MAKE THIS POSSIBLE -NO
BETTER TIME THEN NOW TO GET STARTED TO MAKE THIS A REALITY..TALK IS
TOO EASY ... WE NEED POSITIVE ACTIONS ... other cities across this nation are addressing
these same issues..so as OUR ANAHEIM LEADERSHIP.. PLEASE DISCUSS a little
But Positive REFORM ACTIONS will get the CHANGES THIS CITY NEEDS
ACCOMPLISHED
THANKS FOR READING & CONSIDERING MY ISSUES
Scarlette Almero
LONG time Anaheim resident
& home owner since 1992
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, 12:49 PM Public Comment <Public Qommentaanaheim. net> wrote:
The City is in receipt of your public comment. Your comment will be distributed to
the City Council for their consideration and made part of the public record of the
City Council meeting.
From: Judy Woo
To:
Subject: General Public Comment #MeToo #StoppingDomesticViolenceCan"tWait
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2020 9:20:36 AM
The following is a general public comment for all the public agencies included in this email:
Our community's leadership has undermined the trust and confidence of our residents and
survivors of domestic violence when they public posted the home addresses of victims on the
Internet. Our community can no longer effectively work with Kern County, other counties, or
other cities across the State of California while our mayor, city manager, city attorney., and
city council are under investigation for serious crimes trying to cover up these violations. They
have violated our code of ethics, our values, and our laws. Where's the accountability? I am
signing the petition calling for the resignation of Karen Goh, Christian Clegg, and Virginia
Gennaro. They cannot effectively represent our community and work with leaders across the
state. Please help us end this long nightmare for our community so our city can work with
other cities and counties for positive change across the state. Thank you.
Attachments - 3 Pages
** FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY %*
EASE NUMBER
Occur Date Span
Occur Time Span
Report Date
106/04
ReportTime
Foilow-up Report
F
03/01/2016 thru
0 9: 00 ; 00 thru
/2 0201
9: 09 : 00
INVOLVED PERSON FX -1 Victirn M Witness n Suspect I r-1 Person of Interest F-1 C#)er I r_1 M issiriq Person
Code
ple of Offense or incident
MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES - obstruction of justice, fraud, destruction/alteration of
A r r frve Date
Arrive T me
Eyes
1 nc i dent
Location
Address
RtntoSvc Dt
RtntoSvc. Tm
L I
Agency Code
A
State Zip Code
Code
(7
(b)(C (b) (7
Address
NARMTIVE //UPDATED// J= 4 2020 9:09AM 11111p ly 4� 1111111
On O�/16/2020 at approximately 1000 hours, I Special Aqen` .(b)(6),(b)(7)c interviewed
about concerns that staff and/or elected officials of the City of Bakersfield were providing false
p Code Country
A'6
statements, concealing, and/or destroying records records relevant to an ongoing law enforcement
Driver's License Number
investigation about a survivor of violent crime with a confidential address. Between 3/16/2020 and 6/4/202U
Social Security#
was provided with copies of emails between� t �and (b)(6), (b)(7)c (b)(6),;(b)(7)c at th7_
INVOLVED PERSON FX -1 Victirn M Witness n Suspect I r-1 Person of Interest F-1 C#)er I r_1 M issiriq Person
INVOLVED PERSON F1 victim F1 Witness � Suspect I RX Person of 10eres.t F1 Other I F1 M ii!ssing Person
No. N a rr e (last, first, middle)
Alias
Date of Birth / Age
Sex Race Height Weight
Eyes
Hair
Ginny
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
(b)(G), (b)(7)c
L I
Address
(b)(6)
City
State Zip Code
Code
(7
(b)(C (b) (7
Address
cft.atei
p Code Country
A'6
State
Driver's License Number
State
Social Security#
Nationality
Country of Birth
Home Phone
(b)(6)i (b)(7)c
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
Scars, Ma rks, Tattoos / Ot he r
Arrested
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
NCI C Number
Scars, Marks, Tattoos / Other
Arrested
Citation Number
NCIC dumber
Work Phone
0
Employer
Employer City
State E �mpl oye r Zip
I
rnployer
Employer City
I hh�
State
Employer Zip
Employer Country
I I
INVOLVED PERSON F1 victim F1 Witness � Suspect I RX Person of 10eres.t F1 Other I F1 M ii!ssing Person
INVOLVED PERSON M Victi m rl Witness M Su spec I nX Pe rson of I n to res t rl Other I Missinq Person
No. Name (last, first, middle)
Alias
Date of Birth / Age
Sex Race lHeight Weight Eyes Had
Sex I flace lHeight I Weight I Eyes Ha it
2 Gennaro, Vitrginia
Ginny
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
(b)(G), (b)(7)c
Address
(b)(6)
City
State Zip Code
Code
(7
(b)(C (b) (7
country
State I Z-1 P Code
L=
Driver's License Number
State
Social writ Nationality
Cou ntry of Birth
Home Phone
B
Home Phone
B
(b)(6)i (b)(7)c
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
Scars, Ma rks, Tattoos / Ot he r
Arrested
Citation Number
NCI C Number
Work Phone
NCI C Number
Work Phone
0
0
Employer
Employer City
State E �mpl oye r Zip
Employer Country
INVOLVED PERSON M Victi m rl Witness M Su spec I nX Pe rson of I n to res t rl Other I Missinq Person
Officer Names/Slqnature / 04 Date Supervisor Date Approved
2020-06-04 (b)(6) , (b)(7)c 2020-06-04
Distribution� 1:1 1 nvestigazi c n s 1:1 AUSA 1:1 Loca I Prosecutor RO Other
Case Status; RX Open F1 Closed 17 Unfounded
4* FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY **
No.
Name (last, first, middle)
Alias
Date of Birth / Age
Sex I flace lHeight I Weight I Eyes Ha it
Goh, Karen
Address
City
)c
State I Z-1 P Code
L=
Country
Driver's License Number
State
SOCIal SSC Ur:t Nat I ona I i ty
Country of Birth
Home Phone
B
(b)(6)i (b)(7)c
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
Scars, Darks, Tattoos / Other
Arrested
Citation Number
NCI C Number
Work Phone
0
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
Employer
Employer City
-A
State kmployerZip 'Employer
Coun"
P
Officer Names/Slqnature / 04 Date Supervisor Date Approved
2020-06-04 (b)(6) , (b)(7)c 2020-06-04
Distribution� 1:1 1 nvestigazi c n s 1:1 AUSA 1:1 Loca I Prosecutor RO Other
Case Status; RX Open F1 Closed 17 Unfounded
4* FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY **
**FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ar*
INVOLVED PERSON F-1 victim F1 Witness M Suspect I MY� Person of Intevest rl Other I F1 Missing Person
INVOLVED PERSON F1 Victim F1 Witness F-1 Suspect I n Person of Interest n Other IF] Mis5i.nq Person
No.
Marne (last,first,middle)
Alias
Alias
dace IH eight I' Wei g ht Eyes Hair
Date of Birth / Age
Sex, Race Height Weight r
Drimakisjulie
4
Clegg, Christian
I
j
NCIC Number
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
KLQ
Driver's License Number State
Address
Nationality
ity"
C C 'y
Horne Phone
State I Z -i p Code
Country
Country
Driver's License Number
State
0
So al Security #
Nation Ifty
Nationallfty
ountry of Birth
Home Phone
Work Phone
El
(b
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
imployer
Employer Ci
Scars, M ar ks, Tattoos Other
Arrested. Citation Number
Citation Number
NCIC Number
Work Phone
Work Phone
E]
Employer
-(b)(6), (b)(7)c
Em p loye r City
(b)(6). (b)(7)c
State Employer Zi p
(b)(6),
Employer Country
INVOLVED PERSON F1 Victim F1 Witness F-1 Suspect I n Person of Interest n Other IF] Mis5i.nq Person
INVOLVED PERSON F'j Vi ctim r-1 Witn e 5s r-1 Su s pect I nx P ef s o n of Interest F1 Other I F1 MIs sinq Person
No.
Name (last, first, middle)
Alias
Date of Birth / AgeSex
dace IH eight I' Wei g ht Eyes Hair
Date of Birth / Age
Cate of Bill I Age
5
Drimakisjulie
It
Gorales, And ra e
I
j
NCIC Number
Address city State dip Code Country
6i
KLQ
Driver's License Number State
Social Security #
Nationality
Country of Birth
Horne Phone
B
State
te
State Zip Code
Country
I
State
S o-rja I Seco r iltyANationaliLy
Scars, Marks, Tattoos/ Other Arrested Citation Number NCIC
Number
Work Phone
El
imployer
Employer Ci
State Employer Zip
E m p1l oyer Co u ntry
INVOLVED PERSON F'j Vi ctim r-1 Witn e 5s r-1 Su s pect I nx P ef s o n of Interest F1 Other I F1 MIs sinq Person
VEHICLE M StoIen F1 Darnaged r-1 Recovered I r-1 Suspect f-1 Other F1 Govt F1 Evidence
No..
Name (last, first, middle)
1 State Reg Yr
Alias
Model
Date of Birth / Age
Cate of Bill I Age
Sex Race Height Weight Eyes
Value
6
J6
Gorales, And ra e
ISI lei
NCIC Number
NCIC Number
R/O Address
KLQ
I State
Zip Code
cess
(b)(6)r (b)(7)c
City
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
State
te
State Zip Code
Country
Driver's License Number
State
S o-rja I Seco r iltyANationaliLy
Country of Birth
Home Phone
Scars, Marks, Tattoos /Other
Arrested
Citation Number
NCIC Number
Work Phone
E]
Emp I oye r
Employer C Ity
(b)(6), (b)(7)c
State I Employer zip Employer Country
=(b)(6). (b)(7Lc___j
VEHICLE M StoIen F1 Darnaged r-1 Recovered I r-1 Suspect f-1 Other F1 Govt F1 Evidence
VEHICLE rl S to le n rml Da rn a qed F-1 Recovered I r-1 Suspect M Other F-11 Govt rl Evidence
No.
License No
1 State Reg Yr
Make
Model
Veh Yr
Value
Value
Name (last, first, middie)
Color
ISI lei
NCIC Number
NCIC Number
R/O Address
City
I State
Zip Code
Country
VEHICLE rl S to le n rml Da rn a qed F-1 Recovered I r-1 Suspect M Other F-11 Govt rl Evidence
PROPERTY r-1 Stolen F'j Damaged F-II Recovered I r-1 Suspect F-II Found F-II Other F-II Govt F-II Evidence F1 Weapon
No.
License No
State
E:
Reg Yr
Mak e
Model
Veh Yr
Value
c
R/O Name (last, first, middle)
Color
VIN
NCIC Number
Zip Code
RIO Address 'City
State
Zip Code Coun"
PROPERTY r-1 Stolen F'j Damaged F-II Recovered I r-1 Suspect F-II Found F-II Other F-II Govt F-II Evidence F1 Weapon
Officer Names/Si nature / I'D# Date Supervisor Date Approved
2020-0.6-04 (b)(6), (b)(7)c .2020-06-04
Distribution; R Investigations 1:1 AUSA 1:1 Loca I Prosecutor F-1 RO F-1 Other
Case Status.- RX Open F1 Closed F ]Unf o u n-ded
4* FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
No.
Type Make
Ivalue
Model
Color
D
Owner Name (last, first, middle)
Serjal Number
NCIC Number
Address
City
tate
Zip Code
Cry uritry
Officer Names/Si nature / I'D# Date Supervisor Date Approved
2020-0.6-04 (b)(6), (b)(7)c .2020-06-04
Distribution; R Investigations 1:1 AUSA 1:1 Loca I Prosecutor F-1 RO F-1 Other
Case Status.- RX Open F1 Closed F ]Unf o u n-ded
4* FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
**FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY " Narrative Continuation
at the City of Bakersfield. The computer forensic lab confirmed the authenticity of the emails dated
ff 1,61TISM
1/1.8/2017 with the subject "Home Address - " The emails are an exchan e bet�'Wy J. " I I nd
sate a"t Home 10a C: ip an t
City of BakersfiIL eld staff ask and receive a copy of
identification card.
During the course of the investigation, we interviewe M -P IJUM. arid
The investigation found a concerted effort by andUt the City of f3akeraf ield to
jorovide false tatements to investigators, Kern County employeeaqL,a*n.6uperxor Court officials.
-&
1, (b)(7)c a confidential informant with the City of Bakersfield confirmed nd
(b)(6), (b)(7)c attempted to destroy records and, *rovide false statements in an atteTn3t to conceal
'o
miaconcfucE7_—afizqor tortious acts. Agent sked o call former Ueputy City
Attorney for the City of Bakersfield an as} quest.v.n,s about hiEs, Wr.gW..ction of 81
confidential address and who at the city was aware of articipation in the Safe at Rome
at
tem CeM -11; 1-0 CID 11
faMlo
program the victim's call at approximately 17:11 Pacific time and the call was
submitted that: card? preferred to
r 11 icer he
I It- 030re t
recorded by Officer he call lasted approximately 12 minutes.
During this call r. P el
pi Weillf iL has beeii crulte aWh_1 I don't remember when exactly you first
the Safe at: Hie Identification] or we had this conversation ox-igina-1-1y; that was years ago (umj; I know it
has come up at different- times frim l and that you raised the issue several times but, as fax- as specifically
wha t (um) we dj_ d wl th i L; I know tha t (uml F I don I L recall that t we di d anything wl th I t hones tly; I think
we communicated to everyone that: (uml that was involved that that: (home] address was subject to limitations
and [urn] (urn) there was supposed to be sensitivity in how it was used, used only In particular situations
that were designated in the lawfum] so (um) yeah I don't have specific recollLt-ction of conversations that
we had at the time we first received your address, I know that we, I know that we clearly articulated it, I
know to community development was obviously the holder of that Information through your purchase of the
house fum] , and so I think they were aware of thLt,, situation as far as I urs days toad and [um) I am sure the
clerk was as I recall because there were some, I think you had submitted some- public records requests, if I
remember correctly, um, so yeah 1, 1 don'thave a specific recall of conversations or what: was done to make
sure it was protected but I know that we made it very clear, we renderstoadthe issue and made It vexy clear
to notice the projects we wox-ked with th you know it is supposed to be only utilized in certain
oituat-lons" - or words to that effect. IL
indicated that "Ginny'"' had been briefed and was aware of conf idential address
Wfil
and asked if had reached out to her for assistance. F1,01T611MME on to say " I think you
definitely should, if the (city) manager hasn-t done so already, derin-itely reachout to Gfinny, I me -an.
obviously (uml, IrvLt, been gone for almost a gear and know that the issue was ongoing, you know, that you
ri IS went n! �to n
.raised this several times over the course of }ears, '.,mj I wouldn't know why that was posted or how that
�'ux_ Z zec
tint at effec
was pasted or an y of that or words t L
The investigation .has concluded that Ve3r:".. af ield city attorney) and (b)(6)(b)(7)c
Saar
(Bakersfield city staff) hard knowledge o' participation in the Safe at Home program as of
January 2017 and encouraged other cit staff to d troy records and deceive law enforcement, court, and
8tate personnel about the posting of staff
on Bakersfield's municipal website .
The investigate61 Q Noing to determine J_Lf_ _i1q71L_Wn'r Vice Mayor
c
37 ouncilmember [is Mitt r AW and City Manaqer committed any offences .
STA TUS//UNUEFS INVESTIGATION//
0 ffi-ce r N a n-ies/S I g nate re / I M Date Supervisor Date Approved
2020-06-04 2020-06-C4
CASE NUMBER ** FOR OFFICIAL US E ONLY * *
Theresa Bass
From:
MFnews
Sent:
Thursday, June 18, 2020 8:26 PM
To:
City Clerk
Subject:
Fireworks
To: Anaheim City Counsel,
Please Ban all fireworks this year in particular. Why would you allow any fireworks to tie up all the Police and
Fire Departments for weeks. It's not just the 4th of July it's starting now. Bombs are going off everywhere and
at all times of the day and mostly at night. Personally I have some health problems very similar to (tinnitus) and
need my sleep. I have bombs going off all around me late at night I OP.M. through 2-3 A.M.
How are we able to know when to call the Police because of bombs and if they respond there is are people
everywhere people are lighting off what you call safe and sane fireworks? Haven't you learned anything from
all the riots and evil going on around use. You are no better than the so called media that is promoting this type
of behavior and those terrorist groups like Antivia. and BLM.
How can Police and Fire Department be able to do their jobs when you allow fireworks to distract them in part
of our good city of Anaheim. This year in this environment you must stop the use of fireworks in our city. The
Police and Fire Departments agree with me and say it's not in their control. They have told me they wish more
people would speak out to our city counsel about this. You are endangering the lives of all the people that live
in Anaheim.
The bottom line is, what is the up side to having fireworks legal in Anaheim?
Please put a stop to this madness and keep the city peaceful.
Thank You for your consideration in this matter.
A concerned citizen. of Anaheim
Everything west of the 55 is good? Does that mean no fireworks East of the 55 and a war zone of unsafe and
insane fireworks from the 55 to like Western. Ave. or city limits. Where do they come up with the idea
fireworks are safe and sane?
Talk about sanity, am I insane to think that fireworks are serve as a cover for people to test their m8O's, little
home made bombs and even big bombs in this current environment. With all the riots and looting that's being
going on I can foresee more people shooting guns in the air only to come down and if your lucky enough to win
the lottery, well maybe someone will end up with the not so lucky bullet landing on their head or second prize
have one come through the roof of your home or car. Maybe even random shootings by these organized
domestic terrorists.
Just had a short conversation with two officers down the street and three firemen, they all agreed with my
thoughts RE: fireworks and told me they wish more people like me would go the city council meeting and
request them to put a stop the fireworks. One fireman said
I worry about someones roof catching fire while people are in the house and not be aware their house is on
fire
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
Public Comment
From: Cameo Rose
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 8:28 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor), Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes, Jordan
Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Re: new ammo
Good day,
I am strongly recommending "less lethal" or "non lethal" ammo for the police force in addition to the other
solutions (defunding)you have been working on. These rubber bullets and other safer ideas should be what is
used on criminals by police, 100% of the time. Even when someone is violent, like with hostages and such,
shoot to kill should never be the solution. In Canada and other countries, people are talked down.
i know we are very upset at police for shooting protesters with rubber bullets, I'm not ok with it either, they
should not be doing that to protesters.
What I'm suggesting is when an officer or safety patrol really feels they are in danger, rubber bullets (or
something similar) is what you have as your weapon, not lead ones.
We can't trust them ( the police) with bullets and as a completely non violent person, I think part of the
defending conversation should be, why are we killing and taking an eye for an eye in the first place?
Why don't we stop killing as our criminal solution, and STOP the action in a way we have NEVER THOUGHT
OF BEFORE.
can see a lot of gun lovers hating this idea because of the second amendment.lf people want to say, they use
their guns to "protect and not kill", then let's put our money and our vote where our mouth is and use a different
kind of ammo.
The second amendment says "a well regulated militia", well why can't we arm that militia with guns that do not
kill.
Isn't the point we stop the crime, no one said it had to be through death. You can see that a perpetrator can be
taken down in more creative ways, without loss of life for the officer or the "criminal"'.
Please research " non lethal" and "less lethal" weaponry and ammo.
** I can't take full credit for this idea, my husband inspired me. The pointless killings made my husband rethink
his weapons ( which like I said, I'm non violent and never supported weapons in the first place. I hate guns ),
and he started looking for "less lethal" and "non lethal" ammo, because he actually doesn't want to kill anyone.
Let's realize, our current system is working as it was intended, to kill and imprison anyone that isn't white. I am
suggesting an alternative no one has brought to the table, because one loss of life is too many.
In order to move forward as a critical thinking society, we have to accept, if what we are doing is harmful, WE
HAVE TO CHANGE IT.
Please, consider and share my idea with others.
Please implement this idea into regular and standard use, not just for peaceful protesters.
This is all I can do. Now do YOUR part.
Thank you.
A concerned citizen and voter,
Cameo Maldonado
Public Comment
From:
Jamie Reeves
Sent:
Friday, June 19, 2020 8:03 PM
To:
Jamie.
Subject:
Police
It is absolutely imperative that we defund the police. It is absolutely imperative that both no knock, and quick knock
warrants are completely outlawed. It is absolutely imperative that police misconduct investigations be done by a party
not within, or sympathizing with the police department. It is absolutely imperative that we demilitarize the police. It is
absolutely imperative that SWAT teams don't exist. It is absolutely imperative we do not bring military tactics of police
forces into the homes of people. It is absolutely imperative that we defund the police.
It is absolutely imperative that you stop learning all you know about police presence from police chiefs and police
officers. It is absolutely imperative that you listen to the Black community. It is absolutely imperative that you know that
they will not want to talk to you. It is absolutely imperative that you know that they will not trust you. It is absolutely
imperative that you then work harder to understand. Police are violent. There is no ifs, ands, or buts. The presence of
police is violence. The tactics of police are violence. Your enabling of police is violence. It is absolutely imperative that
you are not violent towards your constituents. It is absolutely imperative that you serve your constituents.
Serve the people you were elected to represent. Do good for the people you were elected to represent. Defund the
police for the people you were elected to represent.
Jamie Reeves
Public Comment
From: Juliet Johnson
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:56 AM
Subject: COVID 19. Release Elderly, Immunocompromised, and Nonviolent Prisoners NOW
To the Anaheim City Council:
I've just been made aware of the DIRE circumstances for prisoners and am writing you to plead for the release of elderly,
immuno -compromised, and nonviolent prisoners, especially those on outdated marijuana charges. our governments are
failing us. It is heartbreakingly clear how urgently we need to defunct the police and reallocate funding for the
rehabilitation of these citizens, and provide jobs, housing, and healthcare. It is unacceptable to let our people die of
preventable illnesses in prison. Not only is this unacceptable from a HUMAN RIGHTS position, but this also endangers
the staff at prisons, their families, and thus the rest of the population. The physical infrastructure and ecological well-
being of our state has long been crumbling, and I would love to see my taxes go towards providing former prisoners with
jobs improving these conditions, instead of imprisoning and torturing and murdering them. The entire criminal justice
system needs to be torn down and rebuilt with a model of care and rehabilitation. our governments are killing us. You
need to change, now.
Sincerely,.
Juliet Johnson
Santa Barbara, CA 93105
Jennifer L. Hall
From: Loretta Day
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 8:23 AM
To: Gregory Garcia; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Lucille
Kring; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Trevor O'Neil
Cc: Theresa Bass; Jennifer L. Hall; Lauren Torres; Lisa Hughes; Amanda Edinger; Annie
Mezzacappa; Cynthia Ward; Daniel Fierro; Helen Myers; Justin Glover; Karen Romero
Estrada; Maria Gonzalez; Marisol Ramirez; Nam Bartash; Samantha Saenz; Sarah Bartczak
Subject: FW: Tuesday Agenda
For Mayor and Council consideration.
From: Gloria MaaE
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 5:15 PM
To: Council <council@anaheim.net>
Subject: Tuesday Agenda
Mayor and council,
I support Anaheim PIS and support investing as much as possible to maintain our level of officers if not increase
it.
I do not support any official backing of BLM. The BLM movement peaceful protests are blurred by the hate on
display throughout our city and country. We should NEVER support hate.
Lastly, all emails in support or against any Anaheim issue should not be considered if not from a resident or
business of Anaheim.
Thank you,
Gloria Ma'ae
Public Comment
From: Mases Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 735 AM
To: Public Comment; Theresa Bass; Gregory Garcia; Linda Andal; Gretchen R. Beatty
Subject: Items 1, 20, and 30 on Council agenda June 23, 2020
Dear City Clerk,
Please distribute to the City Council and confirm that you received this email.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
Due to the unprecedented, multifaceted COVID-19 response, including the shutdown of
our local economy, the City is facing a revenue shortfall over the next year.
The City reports they are considering LAYING OFF City staff and/or reducing public
services, and may take both actions. Public works services will be adversely affected and
there will be more cuts to many other municipal services.
The crippling impact to the City's budget will impact residents, businesses and City
workers. The same City workers who have been on the front lines throughout this crisis
working tirelessly to protect and serve our City's residents will be facing layoffs, and the
community will be hit by cuts to essential services.
Job cuts will not only hurt essential City workers and their families but will adversely affect
their lives as well. The City will cut planners, public works engineers, prosecutors and
other essential local government workers and the core services they deliver. This means
delayed repairs to streets and sidewalks, and limited hours for parks and senior centers,
just to name a few of the core services under threat.
The stakes are too high.
The City should support critical local services and the City workers that provide them.
Council policymakers face a formidable task building the City's budget for the coming
year. While I know there will be tough decisions about how to allocate funds to best
position the City's recovery, one thing is clear: City workers are essential, both to our
safety and to our recovery.
City workers are the engine of our City, and the recovery from the COVID-1 9 crisis starts
with them.
The road to recovery will be long and hard but it will be even longer if we let our City
workers go instead of harnessing their vital economic and social strengths. Providing
funding for City workers is not optional — it is a necessity if we want a vibrant City services
and strong economy.
Please do not layoff City employees. Find another way to balance the budget.
We will work with you to find creative new ways to balance the budget.
Moses Johnson, Acting President AFSCME/MAC
0a
Public Comment
From:
Hadee Makda
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:55 AM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Budget; Resolution 10 and 11
Dear Anaheim City Council,
I demand to see more discussions regarding the police budget, policy changes within the police department, and
4
the role of police unions in this city (the presentation at today's city council meeting is a good first step, albeit a
small one) The APD budget must absolutely be decreased as it currently is 42% of our general fund. This is a
ridiculous number to anyone who ponders the number. Please consider this before next year's budget is adopted
today.
I also want to state that I am disgusted by Mayor Sldhu's statement from the June 9th city council meeting
where he would only vote for a resolution that included "All Lives Matter" instead of "Black Lives Matter".
Of course all lives matter, Mayor Sidhu, but the fact of the matter is that they unfortunately do not in today's
society. Therefore, the whole premise of the BLM movement is to advocate for the recognition that black lives
should matter, too. Black people in this country have been marginalized for hundreds of years, and people who
say "all lives matter" are just trying to direct attention away from the very real issues black people have been
facing for centuries.
In addition, I urge you to support Resolution 10 since we should be making it easier for released prisoners to
return to the workforce. It is extremely difficult for people with criminal records to find a job, and we should be
working to allow them to reintegrate into society after they have served their time. This is the most humane
approach.
Finally, I am urging you to support Resolution 11 as it will help our lower income residents support themselves.
Everyone should have access to fair housing, so it is imperative that these residents receive the information that
will help guide them to these opportunities. By the looks of the staff report, FHCOC seems the most cost-
effective and valuable option between the two Programs with its focus on Orange County, higher goal of walk-
in clinics, more languages offered, and $ 10,000 difference in requested funds.
Thank you Council Members Barnes and Moreno for your commitment to improving our city.
Best,
Hadee Makda
District 6
Public Comment
From: Nicole Octavio
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11.40 AM
To: Public Comment
Hello Mayor Sidhu and City Council Members,
I'm Nicole Octavio. I'm a 18 year old constituent who has lived in Anaheim my entire life. I would like to submit
commentary in support of approving and/or increasing the budget for policies that would better our communities,
specifically Black people and people of color.
Item 10, which concerns the Prison to Employment Initiative Agreement, approves grant funds with a maximum of
$900,000 for two years. Seeing as the total police budget for FY 2019/2020 was over $170 million, Anaheim's City
Council can and should divest more funds into rehabilitating and hiring former prisoners. Please consider raising this
maximum and continuing to support this initiative.
I also would like to voice my support of Item 11, the agreement with OC Fair Housing council, and my eagerness to see
the amount raised. I'm very concerned with advocacy for affordable housing in this area.
As an avid protestor and supporter of the Black Lives Matter initiative, I am eager to hear more about Anaheim's new
policing policies, and your statements on Black Lives Matter and peaceful protesting.
Thank you for your consideration.
Kind regards,
Nicole Octavio
Public Comment
From: TemaeJimenes
Sent: Tuesday, June Z3'2O2O1133AM
To; Harry Sidhu(Mayo0;Jose Moreno; Jordan 8randman; Denise Barnes; Lucille Khng;
Trevor D'NeU;Stephen Faesse|
Cc: Annie Mezzacappa;Justin Glover; Helen Myers; Cynthia Ward; Salvador Figueroa;
Samantha Saenz;Amanda Edinger; Nam Bartash; Sarah Bartczak; Mariso| Ramirez
Gregory Garcia; Sandra Sagert;Jorge Cisneros; Public Comment
Subject: Item #10 -Strong Support -Approve the Prison to Employment Initiative Subcontractor
Agreement
Good morning,
We are in strong support of item #10 Approve the Prison to Employment Initiative Subcontractor Agreement with
the City of Santa Ana to receive grant funds, in an amount not to exceed $900,000, for the provision of work
experience and occupational training, for the contract period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2022; and authorize
the City Manager, or designee, to execute and administer the agreement and any future modifications.
This initiative will beanasset tothe City ofAnaheim and help the residents torehabilitate and break the cycle they are
in. It is imperative to have programs that encourage rehabilitation for non-violent offenders so that they may become
productive members of society. This initiative will do just that. We urge a yes vote on this item. Thank you!
Have ogreat day,
Tamara Jimenez
Community Relations Manager
Lighthouse
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This message is protected under the Federal regulations governing Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient
Records, 42 C.F.R. Part 2, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Actofl996("H|PAA"),45[.F.R.Pts.
160 & 164 and cannot be disclosed without written consent unless otherwise provided for in the regulations. The
Federal rules prohibit any further disclosure of this information unless a written consent is obtained from the person to
whom it pertains. The Federal rules restrict any use of this information to criminally investigate or prosecute any alcohol
or drug abuse patient. If you are not the intended recipient,, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:22 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Item 10 in Consent Calendar
Yes!
These are the types of programs that will help our community rise out of detrimental decisions. Public safety
improves when more community programs like these are implemented. The availability of options to recent
inmates will discontinue recidivism & their propensity to commit crime.
More please
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:31 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Siclhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Items 14 & 15 in consent calendar
Yes,
More of these kinds of improvements for our people to navigate our own city.
May I suggest that the sidewalk begin to be widened as well to better cater to our students & community
members who use the sidewalk throughout the day.
Meanwhile the majority of our city is built to cater to motor vehicle based travel which are really used heavily
10%-20% of the day, during noncovid times.
More please.
- Edgar
Public Comment
From:
Robert Acosta
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:15 AM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Comments Regarding the City Fiscal Emergency
Dear Council Members:
My name is Robert Acosta. 1 have been an employee of the City of Anaheim for 18 years.
love this city, the community, the people, the amenities, ... and my job.
We are one of the best cities in California and perhaps in the United States.
So, let's keep it that way.
Part of keeping our city in great shape is the work that the city employees do day -in and day -out.
I am acutely aware of the financial situation the city is facing.
agree with almost all of the solutions that I have heard that have been proposed or implemented.
However, I am afraid that if you institute layoffs, you will adversely affect the greatness of our City.
would like to propose some ALTERNATIVES TO LAYOFFS:
1. Find out if any contracted work can be done in house. If so, terminate those contracts, and assign jobs
to city employees.
2. Implement furloughs across the board. For example, everyone without exception gets furlough for
one week or seven (7) days.
3. Stop all salary increases for the next three years for everyone in the City including City Management,
Police, and Fire Department.
4. Immediately implement a 3% salary reduction across the board. Everyone without exception gets a 3%
salary cut.
5. Encourage those who can stay and work from home, to continue doing that (so they can save on gas
and time as well as on car maintenance) and to take a 5% pay cut (which it is an additional 2% above
the 3% mentioned above).
G. Encourage those who are within a couple of years from retirement to consider retiring right now.
7. Incentivize those who are older than 60 but not within a couple of years from retirement, to retire
right now with a retirement package such as $25,000 incentive.
8. Incentivize any employee who is not within retirement age, to leave the city and take a small
separation financial package. For example offer them $50,000.
Let's keep the City of Anaheim thriving' We, the employees of the City are willing to make some sacrifices. Let's work
together. NO LAYOFFS.
Thank you,
1
Robert Acosta
Integrated Resources Planner II
Anaheim Public Utilities
Public Comment
From: Kay Lee
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:22 AM
To: Public Comment
Cc: Kay Lee
Members of the Anaheim City Council,
I have been working with City of Anaheim last 30 years, which was grateful and happy with wonderful co-
workers.
I ask that the city does not layoff any employees. All of us have been working hard for living. Under this kind
of unexpected situation, layoff means struggling with how to survive. One more thing to ask you, as a single
female employee, too much pay -cut (I am so sorry that it might sound too selfish), however, it gives me worry
and anxiety for my future.
Please look into this kind of mental frustration, also.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Kay Lee
GIS System Technician 11
Finance Department I GIS Central
200 South Anaheim Boulevard I Suite 143
Anaheim, CA 92805
Office: (714) 765-4172
FAX: (714) 765-4199
E-mail: klee@anaheim.net
Public Comment
From: Maribel Palmer
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:50 AM
To. Public Comment
Subject: Public Comment- Item#20
urge Council not to layoff City employees. Instead looking at alternative cost savings such as lowering expenses and
implementing City wide furloughs as a last alternative.
Thank you,
Maribel
Public Comment
From: Emily Chao
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 8-.00 AM
Subject: Please act now.
Please act now to confront and strategically disassemble modem systemic
white supremacy and anti -black racism and their lingering historic effects.
Please criminalize anti -black racism.
Please process all police corruption, brutality, and racism cases without ball.
Please get a reparations for Black slavery Act passed.
Please add blatant historic and systemic modem anti -black racism, white
supremacy, and privilege into public school k-12 curriculum. Please include in
historic education the Black massacres and Black lynching stories with the
alleged accusations that sparked them. Please include the long term
psychological and social impacts and their connection to internal bias.
Please.
Emily
Public Comment
From:
Julia McGowan
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 8:39 PM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Black Lives Matter
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Julia McGowan, and. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim
community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health
must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown
residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and
some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the
2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community
development. The funds that the city has budgeted for law enforcement and incarceration should be redirected
into COVID- 19 relief, affordable housing, education, healthcare, community centers, updating infrastructure,
and community -led organizations.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department
killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of
arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher
than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer
money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to
surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to
improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned
community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Julia McGowan
From:
JASPAL SINGH BASSI
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Public Comment- Black Lives Matter
Date:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:13:27 AM
As I am sure you are aware, the murder rate of Anaheim PD is one of the 8 in the nation that
exceeds the national murder rate. Another is Santa Ana and I will be submitting a similar
comment to their city council. This means that 25% of the police departments that murder
more people on average than all criminals in the United States are here in Orange County.
By mere definition these murders disproportionately affect Black and Brown individuals
due to the structural racism that plagues police departments across this nation. This is
not only despicable and loathsome, but it is absolutely INHUMANE! Despite these statistics,
cities across the nation, including Anaheim, have vastly increased budgets for police
departments in recent years.
The police department continues to discriminate against and dehumanize Brown and Black
individuals here in Anaheim, and that is no more apparent than when one takes a look at the
city's homeless population. Homelessness here in Anaheim and across Orange County has
skyrocketed in the last decade, with Black and Brown individuals comprising the majority of
those unhoused. These individuals are victim to continuous searches, racial profiling, and
often have their encampments destroyed at the hands of police. They have to pick up and
relocate whatever belongings they managed to save, and move to another location where they
wait for the police to come in and destroy their community all over again. Clearly, this is not
properly addressing this major public health crisis. This is just one of the many examples of
how police continue to discriminate against the Black and Brown community.
As a future medical professional, as a resident of Orange County, as A FELLOW HUMAN
BEING, I demand that you assess the policies and procedures you have in place at Anaheim
PD. The police department as we know it must be defunded and more money needs to be
placed towards training social workers, housing stability for those without homes, drug abuse
and rehabilitation services, food security, and more. The police department as we know it must
be reconstructed as a much smaller and less frequently utilized unit. Now more than ever is the
time to start thinking in the long term about the social injustices here in Anaheim and to begin
extinguishing their effects on the Black community! Black Lives Matter!
-Jaspal Singh Bassi
Public Comment
From:
pau|inehernandez
Sent:
Tuesday, June Z3'2O2O112OAM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Anaheim PD
Black Lives Matter. Minority Lives Matter. Victims Lives Matter. My one and only experience I've had with Anaheim
PD left me traumatized and forced me to look for alternatives, rather than call 911 and depend on strangers to help me.
In late 2018, 1 made my first 911 call. I had been in a heavily emotionally and physically abusive relationship and one day
my ex boyfriend showed up to my home without my consent and began to punch, kick, and choke me, which I told the
911 responder. The 911 responder spoke to me in such a degrading way and made me feel as if I was the one that had
done something wrong for getting beat up. Anaheim PDthen took 3Ominutes for 3officers toshow up, arrest myex,
and explain to me about 15 feet away from him that "feelings change" and "'restraining orders are a long process" and
made sure to ask me multiple times if I knew ""these charges would go on his record and he"s a minor" when we were
both 17years old atthe time and hewould beturning 18soon. These are not the people vveshould trust tokeep our
children and neighbors safe. Anaheim Police Department must be defunded and officers and workers with multiple
complaints must be removed from the force, rather than praised and promoted. You have the power to change this!
Help the people.
Public Comment
From:
andrew conde
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9-.43 AM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Police Brutality.
Hi,.
My name is Andrew Conde. I am an Air Force veteran. Also I suffer from a mental condition.
That I am still trying to recover from after my Brutal arrest mentally and physically. I was
peacefully protesting about 3 weeks ago. And was arrested at gunpoint while leaving peacefully.
4 Anaheim PD plain clothed officers jumped out of a white mini- van in the middle of an
intersection. Did not identify themselves. I debate whether or not officer Curiel drew his tater or
gun on me for no reason. I had no weapons at all.. When I said that he had to identify him self he
pointed to the little "POLICE" patch on body armor. Which I could not see because of his raised
arms pointing a gun at me. This is how people die. What if I truly did not realize who he was?
My friend & I were then told that they picked us out of the crowd because we were launching
mortars at a helicopter ... thats damn near terrorism.
While handcuffed in one of your interrogation rooms I was intimidated and beaten by badge
number "87 while handcuffed. Seeing as how he was not wearing a name tag or rank and not
telling me who he was after he beat me. He elbowed me in the back while I was sitting in a chair
in handcuffs subdued by two Jailers. Is throwing elbows into peoples spines while handcuffed
taught in the police academy? I was also choked by him. I then cried because I already have a
fractured vertebrae in my spine and it sent nerve pain throughout my body after taking an elbow
to my back by badge number "87. He then stood outside of the door and made fun of me as I
cried. Officer "J. Pratt" took a report on the misconduct that had just happened. All the while
mocking me. Please watch the video.
We were told we were going to cited and released for hours starting at 8:00 pm. Then thrown
into a jail cell. Told we were going to be released "when the paperwork was finished". By
am we were finally told were going to be released at 5 -.3 0 am. I went out and peacefully
protested. I had a gun drawn on me, beaten by badge "87 while handcuffed in A anaheim police
department interrogation room, and j ailed without cause and not told when we were going to be
released. I feel as though I have been tortured by your police department.
This is not how you garner support for the police department. Those officers that participated in
this entire escapade are the ones who give good cops a bad name. This all happened because I
was peacefully protesting.
Sent from my Phone
Public Comment
From:
andrew conde
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9-.46 AM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Police Brutality.
Hi,.
My name is Andrew Conde. I am an Air Force veteran. Also I suffer from a mental condition.
That I am still trying to recover from after my Brutal arrest mentally and physically. I was
peacefully protesting about 3 weeks ago. And was arrested at gunpoint while leaving peacefully.
4 Anaheim PD plain clothed officers jumped out of a white mini- van in the middle of an
intersection. Did not identify themselves. I debate whether or not officer Curiel drew his tater or
gun on me for no reason. I had no weapons at all.. When I said that he had to identify him self he
pointed to the little "POLICE" patch on body armor. Which I could not see because of his raised
arms pointing a gun at me. This is how people die. What if I truly did not realize who he was?
My friend & I were then told that they picked us out of the crowd because we were launching
mortars at a helicopter ... thats damn near terrorism.
While handcuffed in one of your interrogation rooms I was intimidated and beaten by badge
number "87 while handcuffed. Seeing as how he was not wearing a name tag or rank and not
telling me who he was after he beat me. He elbowed me in the back while I was sitting in a chair
in handcuffs subdued by two Jailers. Is throwing elbows into peoples spines while handcuffed
taught in the police academy? I was also choked by him. I then cried because I already have a
fractured vertebrae in my spine and it sent nerve pain throughout my body after taking an elbow
to my back by badge number "87. He then stood outside of the door and made fun of me as I
cried. Officer "J. Pratt" took a report on the misconduct that had just happened. All the while
mocking me. Please watch the video.
We were told we were going to cited and released for hours starting at 8:00 pm. Then thrown
into a jail cell. Told we were going to be released "when the paperwork was finished". By
am we were finally told were going to be released at 5 -.3 0 am. I went out and peacefully
protested. I had a gun drawn on me, beaten by badge "87 while handcuffed in A anaheim police
department interrogation room, and j ailed without cause and not told when we were going to be
released. I feel as though I have been tortured by your police department.
This is not how you garner support for the police department. Those officers that participated in
this entire escapade are the ones who give good cops a bad name. This all happened because I
was peacefully protesting.
Sent from my Phone
Public Comment
From:
matt ma risca I
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1032 AM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Police
My name is Matthew Mariscal and I'm 22 years old. I've lived in anaheim my entire life and I'm a tax payer- which
means, you all work for me (the public.) I am a resident of District 4. Luckily for us, Bring has been termed out. The
Anaheim PD is notoriously one of the most violent PD's in America. Yet, for its size, the city of anaheim is one of the
safest places to live. So why is there such a disparaging correlation between crime and police abuse. We need everyone
that works for the city of anaheim to realize something: You are ALL public employees. You work for the public. For too
long, we've asked for Nick Bennallack to be fired and arrested off Anaheim PD for killing FOUR people. He is a murderer.
Tell us why his coworkers call him "Buckshot". Is it because he is trigger happy? The public is waking up and we are tired
of the lip service you politicians pay us. elle DEMAND that Anaheim PD Swat officer Nick Bennallack be fired and
arrested. We demand that Anaheim PD de -militarize. There is NO reason a group of peaceful protestors should be met
with military grade weaponry. None what so ever. There is no reason why government agents (aka the police) should be
able to carry weapons of war on OUR streets. Streets that WE- the public- pay for. There is NO reason why people who
work honest jobs should be extorted, through taxation, in order to fund LITERAL MURDERERS, like Bennnellack and the
rest of Anaheim PD. Taxation is theft, period.
Public Comment
From:
Jenna Santa Maria
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:18 AM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Police instruction
Hello!
My name is Jenna Santa Maria. I live in Anaheim Hills. I think with everything that is going on, the city of Anaheim should
have the police make videos of how citizens should interact with the police and the police with the citizens so everyone
knows what they have the right to. Interacting with the police shouldn't be a mystery.
Thank you,
Jenna Santa Maria
Public Comment
From:
Damar Valentin
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:36 AM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
CANCEL RENT
Dear Mayor Harry,
Since the Coronavirus pandemic broke out in mid-March, laying bare the toxic effects of a system that has for
far too long dominated our society, turning healthcare into profit -driven businesses, hoarding profits at the
expense of underpaid and undervalued workers, favoring profit over human lives and exposing inequalities. The
ability to get your life back together after this pandemic will depend on your race, gender, class, age and
geography. I'm sure you are fully aware that the majority of Anaheim residents are being disproportionately
affected by the pandemic. Anaheim residents are getting hit with Coronavirus at far higher rates than other OC
cities. This is no surprise considering that many of the residents within Anaheim tend to have lower -incomes,
higher rates of people working in essential jobs and are of Hispanic/latinx ethnicity. Because of the state of
emergency lockdown, many of the residential tenants are struggling to feed their families, to obtain healthcare,
and to pay their bills. They have had no source of income for the past 3/4 months. As a result, many of our
residential tenants are facing evictions at eviction protection program is not enough,
es I the end of this month. An ev' '
you must cancel rent for 3 months for all residential tenants. Moreover, you must also bring relief to landlords
and homeowners as well. If it is in your heart, I plead that you listen to the residents and take action.
Sincerely,
Damar Valentin
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:03 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Item 4 in Consent Calendar
Happy to see that the Orangewood corridor will be Rehabilitated. It is an important Bicycle route that connects
the Ponderosa Library Community to the Santa Ana River Trail, as well as the other Shopping destinations near
there.
Please require Bicycle & Pedestrian improvements to better serve the community to travel that area. Many are
not able to access a motor vehicle not only due to lack of funds, but also due to the fact that the majority of the
residents in that area are children or young adults!
We need to stop building our city to cater to young professional adults, and instead make sure that we are
ensuring that our own children are able to travel & explore our wonderful city & region.
Onward!
Edgar Arellano
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:13 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Item 5 in Consent Calendar
Hello council members,
Please consider implementing some sort of policy that will continue to uphold a slow street atmosphere to the
Anaheim Resort Area.
While the reality of a congested corridor is a problem, widening not only induces demand, but also creates
dangerous driving conditions by enabling speeding through design.
I hope that this project along Katella is more visionary in protecting & enabling human level interactions rather
than appeasing to drivers that want to speed through this vital corridor.
There is a Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan that you have been putting energy into the past year. These
widening projects only serve to diminish the impacts from interventions that may save lives & encourage
economic development in the area.
Please consider the potential for speeding in this 35mph corridor
Public Comment
From: William Camargo
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12-25 PM
To: Edgar Arellano
Cc: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Re: Item 9 In Consent Calendar
wow just that wtf :/
Sent from my iPhone
a On Jun 231 2020, at 12:20 PM, Edgar Arellano
a
wrote:
a
> No!
> why are we allowing for the Police department to continue the very illegal & immoral practice of civil forfeiture.
> These types of practices are exactly what has contributed to the deterioration of community trust in the Police
Department.
> Right now! of all the times, our people will suffer & rage if the Police Department is allowed to steal our property
through civil forfeiture.
> Is this practice being privatised & commodified? why does K.I.F Investigations, LLC need to be involved? was there an
RFP issued?
> Refute this Item & vote NO
1
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:20 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Item 9 In Consent Calendar
No!
Why are we allowing for the Police department to continue the very illegal & immoral practice of civil
forfeiture.
These types of practices are exactly what has contributed to the deterioration of community trust in the Police
Department.
Right now! of all the times, our people will suffer & rage if the Police Department is allowed to steal our
property through civil forfeiture.
Is this practice being privatised & commodified? Why does MY Investigations, LLC need to be involved?
Was there an RFP issued?
Refute this Item & vote NO
Public Comment
From: Pat D
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:58 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Today's Council meeting
Good morning
While very disappointed that our city is doing nothing to accommodate public comments, live in the room
while you are making decisions that impact all of us for a great deal of time, I offer the following:
Looking at a very lengthy agenda I'd like to make comments on several items:
On the budget workshop.
Our budget is a mess you need to look at redirecting law enforcement resources from public safety to provide
resources to the community members and programs that provide foundational services to our community. These
include housing, mental health, support services that all need increased revenue. Staffing cuts would be very
difficult at this time. Quality of life is not enhanced by inflated PD budget. Their grants are targeted. Recent
salary increases didn't help our bottom line.
You need to identify revenue streams which should include gate taxes and fees that tourists could and should
cover.
Item 8
Forgive monthly rent -what a great idea, but wait it's for a golf course! How about our families who are in
desperate need of help. Your rent subsidy program might make you feel good but it is not a long term solution
nor adequate. We need permanent rents subsidies and affordable housing.
Item 26
1 am in support of the Black Lives Matter resolution. Unfortunately it was slow in coming.
Item 29
In the COVID update I hope there's discussion of the honesty the city needs to use in reporting numbers.
Misrepresenting the fact that our numbers are growing attributing them only because of testing is dishonest.
Masks are now a reality and I am hoping that code enforcement or other oversight groups will be given the
authority to oversee the requirement of masks for businesses and individual compliance. They need to create a
plan for education and citing when lack of compliance. Businesses will suffer if there's not clarity that it's a
requirement and if not done and further shutdown occurs, our economy will once again be tanked.
Item 32 and any zoning amendments
Any residential developments must include low and very low income units. Why do you continue ignore
RHNA goals and give away these opportunities create housing stood most in need?
Any zoning maps changed are another place you could include a requirement for low and very low income
housing. There must be inclusion in any and all building projects. The pittance level buyouts are unforgivable,
giving away land and livable opportunities for the majority of our community.
Finally I do expect before the next meeting the city will have established a method for call-in live participation
for comments. Those of us who are risk of COVID- 19 due to health complications will not be able to be a live
participant any time soon. I also find the e-mails are inefficient, likely unread, and not giving folks the
opportunity to hear how people are thinking. In addition you each should be on video so that we can see your
level of focus and participation.
Thank you
Pat Davis
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos.
Public Comment
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Petition to
545 PM Mon Jun 22
Done
AA
Q Search Nextdoor
Nancy Graner
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 539 AM
Public Comment
Illegal Fireworks Petition
i nextdoor.com
Nancy Grainer
Anaheim - Founders/Westmont - 7 Jun
Petition to Stop Illegal Fireworks in The City of Anaheim. Request signs should be
posted throughout Anaheim stating there are Fines ranging from $1000 - $3000
for those individuals or groups with illegal fireworks in the city of Anaheim.
Choose one-.
* Yes 84%
0 No 16%
Posted in General to 18 neighborhoods
I
742 votes
70%
Nancy Graner
Open Heart V
Open Mind
Be Humble
Be Kind
Public Comment
From: DAVID DU RAN
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:59 AM
To: Public Comment
Cc: Kelly Aviles; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Lucille Kring; Stephen
Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jose Moreno; Jordan Brandman; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: RE: Public Comment(s)
Please know that the council's neglect to comply with the Brown. Act is being documented and reported. for the
past several city council meetings the public has been denied public comment. Instead, the council has meet in
secret and not in compliance with Brown Act regulations. according to the Brown Act, calling in from an
undisclosed location is unacceptable, not using necessary and available technology so the public can participate
through public comments in unacceptable, hearing Lucille Kring admit that she was on the "wrong phone"
during a city council meeting demonstrates non compliance.
The residents deserve better! I DEMAND that the corruption, lack of transparency, and Brown Act non
compliance stop immediately.
Making decisions and the spending of residents and taxpayer funds without public input and/or proper
transparency, is unacceptable, corrupt, and unlawful.
Mayor Sidhu demonstrates on a regular basis that he does not care about the residents; unless, they contribute to
his campaign. He also practices racial discrimination against other city council members through his often
successful efforts to silence the council person elected to represent the constituents that elected them.
With "leadership" of this type/practice, Anaheim residents, like myself, are very upset with the ongoing
corruption and unlawful practices of the sitting Mayor and city council.
If there is a city council person willing to step forward to publically absolve themselves of these alleged
charges, please make yourself known; otherwise, we the residents are only left with the perception and/or reality
that some or all of the city council is unlawful and corrupt.
Please immediately provide the proper technology or process to allow and/or give residents a clean and safe
location at city council and/or the access to technology where the council and the public can visually see the
council and have access to visually and/or via phone call, participate real time, during city council meetings
during the COVID- 19 pandemic.
David L. Duran
Orange County, California
cell:
email:
Breach of confidentiality & accidental breach of confidentiality
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the
named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If
you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
Public Comment
From: Nancy Graner
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:17 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Petition to Stop Illegal Fireworks in Anaheim
We are asking the city to post signs all over Anaheim about fines for illegal fireworks.
VOTE YES ON THE PETITION
https://nextdoor. compost/ 150944506?init_source=copy_link_share
Sent from Yahoo Mail for Wad
Public Comment
From: Nancy Graner
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:12 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Petition to Stop Illegal Fireworks in Anaheim
We are asking the city to post signs all over Anaheim about fines for illegal fireworks. If this
link does not work, I have attached a screenshot from this week with more than 700 Yes
votes.
Nextdoor
By Nextdoor
Stay in the know with Nextdoor, the neighborhood hub.
Additionally, we are in no -way satisfied with the temporary mechanical signs that the city
will remove whenever they see fit. Again, we want permanent signage stating "Illegal
Fireworks are Not Allowed in Anaheim - $1000 - $3000 Fine."
Sent from Yahoo Mail for Wad
Public Comment
From:
Jennifer L. Hall
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12-42 PM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Phone Message for Council
Mayor and Council,
A caller left the following message for your consideration:
June 27 is former Mayor Curt Pringle's birthday and she would like the City to recognize him as a great leader and wish
him a Happy Birthday. She hoped he could return to the political realm and believed he would serve well as the Mayor
of Los Angeles.
She believes Anaheim is doing will under Mayor Sidhu's leadership and she is working to eliminate corruption and
racketeering in Los Angeles.
Jennifer.C.Hall, caqc
Assistant City Clerk
r
Office of the City Clerk
City of Anaheim
714-765-5166
From: Public Comment
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor
o"Neil
Cc: Ted White; Amanda Edinger; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios(aria nna(a)communicationslab.com); Cynthia
Ward; Daniel Fierro (daniel(apresidiosc.com); David Belmer; Gregory Garcia; Helen Myers; Justin Glover; Karen
Romero Estrada; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Marisol Ramirez; Nam Bartash; Robert Fabela; Samantha Saenz;
Sarah Ba rtcza k; Theresa Bass
Subject: FW: Letters on Items 22-24 on Anaheim City Council Agenda for 6.23.2020
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:29:00 PM
Attachments: Ltr Item 23 Mixed -Use Development on Lincoln-Loara 23.6.2020.pdf
Ltr Item 22 GP Amendment -1619 W. Lincoln 6.23.2020.pdf
Ltr Item 24 Densitv Bonus Revisions 6.23.2020. Ddf
From: Cynthia Guerra<cynthiag@ken nedycommission.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:27 P M
To: Public Comment <publiccomment@anaheim.net>; City Clerk <cityclerk@anaheim.net>
Cc: Cesar C<cesarc@l<ennedycommission.org>; Ugochi Nicholson
<unicholson@publiclawcenter.org>; eembree@clsocal.org
Subject: Letters on Items 22-24 on Anaheim City Council Agenda for 6.23.2020
Hi,
Please find attached the comments regarding today's Anaheim City Council meeting (6.23.2020):
• Item 22: A 115 Unit, Attached Single -Family Residential Development at the
Northeast Corner of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Street (Second Reading)
• item 23: Mixed -Use Development at the Southwest Corner of Avenue Lincoln
and Loara Street (Second Reading)
• Item 24: zoning Code Amendment to Update Chapter 18.52 (Density Bonuses)
of the Zoning Code
Please confirm receipt of this email and let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you for all your help.
Thank you,
Cynthia Guerra
Cynthia Guerra
The Kennedy Commission
Community Organizer
June 23, 2020
M � _ � i � �,
I&A k"TA E 0&`WMX4111ftT,NWd
Mayor Harry Sidhu and Councilmembers www.kennedycommission.org
Anaheim City Council 17701 Cowan Ave., Suite 200
200 South Anaheim Boulevard Irvine, CA 92614
949 250 0909
Anaheim, CA 92805 Fax 949 263 0647
Re: ITEM 22: General Plan Amendment NO. 2019-00527 Reclassification NO. 2019-00320
Conditional Use Permit NO. 2019-06009 Tentative Tract MAP NO. 19017
Dear Mayor Sidhu and Councilmembers,
The Kennedy Commission (the Commission) is a broad coalition of residents and community
organizations that advocates for the production of homes affordable for families earning less than
$20,000 annually in Orange County. Formed in 2001, the Commission has been successful in
partnering and working with jurisdictions in Orange County to create effective policies that have
led to the production of new homes affordable to low 'income working families.
We are writing to express our opposition of the proposed approval and rezoning of 7.17 -acre site
located at 1619, 1631, and 1699 west Lincoln Avenue and an adjacent City -owned parcel as
proposed. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing industrial and commercial buildings
on the site, rezone the site, and construct 115 attached, market rate single-family residences
using the RM3.5 zone development standards. The proposed project would include 27 buildings
with 3 to 5 units per building, which would be comprised of 30 two-bedroom units and 85 three-
bedroom units. Our letter and its objections were reviewed and made part of the record as part of
public comments at hearings by the Anaheim Planning Commission on its April 14, 2020
meeting and by the City Council on its June 9, 2020 meeting. We request that the Council make
specific findings of consistency with its General Plan, Housing Element, and the CA Surplus
Land Act in considering this action item. Our objection continues to be based two main issues;
Lack of Sites to Meet Affordable Housing Remaining Need and Rezoning of Sites
The development proposes a rezoning of sites to allow residential development that is
inconsistent with the General Plan and Housing Element goals to meet housing needs at
all income levels in Anaheim. The proposal fails to provide incentives and land use
zoning for affordable housing to meet the City's sole remaining housing needs, the lower
income categories. None of the units are proposed as affordable housing to help meet the
City's remaining RENA needs at the low, very low, and extremely low income levels.
1 of 3
As highlighted in the City of Anaheim's April 2019 Housing Element Progress Deport
that was submitted to the California Housing and Community Development, the City has
a deficit of affordable housing. The City has permitted over 7,477 housing units during
the current Housing Element period and only 245 have been in the affordability level of
low and very low. The vast majority of the housing units, 7,182 have been approve at
moderate and above moderate income levels. with only a year left in the planning period
and with the City lacking site capacity for its remaining affordable housing needs, it is
imperative that the City of Anaheim prioritize affordable housing on the few remaining
opportunity sites and in new sites being rezoned and being incentivized for housing
development. In addition, by providing these generous incentives and rezoning the City
is facilitating development without considering the objectives of the Density Bonus law,
which is to increase affordable housing in housing development. These wholesale land
use changes are inconsistent with the General Plan and Housing Elements objectives and
are circumventing Density Bonus law, as an affordable housing tool.
We request that a minimum of 15% of the new residential units be made affordable
to low, very low and extremely low-income families. Alternately, a more appropriate
in lieu fee should be calculated to address affordable housing off site based on
comparable costs. Any fees should be dedicated exclusively to develop the affordable
housing needed for lower income families.
The CA Surplus Land Act Requires that Surplus Land Be offered for Affordable Housing
or open Space
The westerly parcel along Euclid Street is a vacant City -owned parcel that was formerly a
Caltrans right-of-way, and the easterly parcel along Lincoln Avenue is a Successor
Agency (formerly Redevelopment Agency) owned parcel. The CA Surplus Land Act,
Cal. Gov. Code, § 54220, et seq., requires that when a local agency wishes to dispose of
land it no longer requires, the agency must send a written offer to sell or lease the
property to certain entities for affordable housing or park purposes. In adopting the Act,
the California Legislature declared, "housing is of vital statewide importance to the
health, safety, and welfare of the residents of this state and ... provision of a decent
home and a suitable living environment for every Californian is a priority of the highest
order," and thus "surplus government land, prior to disposition, should be made available
for that purpose." Cal. Gov. Code, § 54220(a). Specifically, the Act requires that a local
2 of 3
agency disposing of surplus land must send a "written offer to sell or lease for the
purpose of developing low and moderate -income housing" to local public agencies and,
upon request, to individuals or organizations certified by the state to "own, construct,
acquire, or rehabilitate a housing development"
Conclusion
We ask that the City of Anaheim not approve the General Plan Amendment without addressing
affordable housing needs for low, very low and extremely low families in Anaheim. We also
request for a formal disposition of the agency owned land in a manner that complies with the
Surplus Land Act by, at a minimum, offering a priority to sell, lease or use the land for
affordable housing. The City needs to prioritize its City owned land to create much needed
affordable housing. In considering the rezoning and the transfer of public land the City must
make specific findings of consistency with its Housing Element and the CA Surplus Land Act.
Lower-income families in Anaheim are likely to bear the brunt of the economic impacts of the
present and expanding health crisis with significant numbers of workers expected to lose their
jobs and find themselves unable to pay for high rent, health care, and other necessities. This is a
crucial time to continue investing in affordable housing development. We urge you to approve
new housing developments in a way that will help the City of Anaheim meet housing needs and
Housing Element goals in and equitable manner. With growing concerns about housing and
economic insecurity— we believe that the City can prioritize the development of affordable
homes that residents desperately will need, during and after this crisis.
The Kennedy Commission thanks you for your partnership and all your ongoing efforts to
improve quality of life and expand affordable housing options for residents in Anaheim.
If you have any questions please contact Cesar Covarrubias at cesarcgkennedycommission.org
Sincerely,
Cesar Covarrubias
Executive Director
3 of 3
June 23, 2020 0
www.kennedycommission.org
17701 Cowan Ave., Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
949 250 0909
Mayor Harry Sidhu and City Council Members
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92805
RE: Item 23- Mixed -Use Development at the Southwest Corner of Lincoln Avenue and
Loara Street (Second Reading)
Dear Mayor Sidhu and City Council Members:
The Kennedy Commission (the Commission) is a broad based coalition of residents and
community organizations that advocates for the production of homes affordable for families
earning less than $20,000 annually in Orange County. Formed in 2001, the Commission has
been successful in partnering and working with Orange County jurisdictions to create effective
housing and land -use policies that has led to the new construction of homes affordable to lower
income working families.
As the Council conducts its second reading of the mixed-use development located at the
southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street, the Commission urges the Council
to revise the project to include a minimum of 15% affordable units that are available to
low, very low and extremely low-income families. The City is currently accepting only a
voluntary developer's contributions of $300,000.1 If the City is unwilling to require the
inclusion of affordable units in the proposed development, then it should require a more
appropriate in lieu fee to build affordable housing off site based on comparable costs. In
addition, any fee collected in lieu of the needed affordable housing should be directed to the
construction of the affordable housing not being built by the developer.
The City's 2019 Annual Housing Element Progress Report for the 2014-2021 planning period
illustrates the urgent need for affordable housing for Anaheim residents and the disproportionate
production of above moderate income units. For the 2014-2021 Housing Element planning
period, the City has a Regional Housing Deeds Assessment (RHNA) of 1,256 very love- and 907
low-income households. To -date, the City has built 124 or 10% of the 1,256 very low-income
units and 121 or 13% of the 907 low-income units.2 However, for the above moderate -income
units, the City outperformed and exceeded the RHNA by constructing 7,182 or 287% of the
2,501 above moderate -income RHNA.3 While 948 above moderate units were added in 2019,
only 53 units total were added at the very low and low income levels. with a remaining RHNA
need of 1,950 lower income homes, it is important the City prioritize the development of
new affordable homes and adopt a mixed -income housing ordinance to encourage the
development of affordable homes for lower income households in the City.
I City of Anaheim's City Council Agenda Item 23 staff Report, p. 1, June 2020.
z City of Anaheim's 2019 Annual Housing Element Progress Report, p. 2, April 2020.
3 City of Anaheim's 2019 Annual Housing Element Progress Report, p. 3, April 2020.
Mayor Harry Sidhu and City Council Members
June 23, 2020
The Council must keep in mind that a new, and likely larger, RHNA allocation will be issued for
the City when the new cycle begins in 2021. If the City continues to prioritize the development
of above moderate housing at the expense of housing for low income families, it will have a
difficult time finding sites to meet its current and its new RHNA requirements. This is especially
true for housing opportunity sites that the City has identified as suitable for affordable housing.
For example, in 2019 the City approved a 20 -acre market -rate residential development in the
Residential Opportunity Overlay Zone, depleting the capacity of the City meet its remaining
housing needs for lower income households. A multi -prong affordable housing strategy
should be developed in the City that includes implementing effective housing policies and
programs (i.e., mixed income ordinance, especially in the Platinum Triangle and rent
stabilization) and adopting an updated Affordable Housing Strategic Plan (AHSP) that
provides specific goals in the construction of affordable homes,
The Commission looks forward to partnering with the City to increase affordable home
opportunities for lower income households in the City, especially as the City works to address
the impact of COVID-19 on the housing security of residents. Please keep us informed of any
updates and meetings regarding strategies to increase affordable homes for lower income
households in the City. If you have any questions, please free to contact me at (949) 250-0909 or
cesarc@kennedycommission.org.
Sincerely,
Cesar Covarrublas
Executive Director
Page 2 of 2
June 23, 2020
www.kennedycommission.org
17701 Cowan Ave.,, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92614
Mayor Harry Sidhu and City Council Members 949 250 0909
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92805
RE: Item 24- Zoning Code Amendment to Update Chapter 18.52 (Density Bonuses) of the
Zoning Code
Dear Mayor Sidhu and City Council Members:
The Kennedy Commission (the Commission) is a broad based coalition of residents and
community organizations that advocates for the production of homes affordable for families
earning less than $20,000 annually in Orange County. Formed in 2001, the Commission has
been successful in partnering and working with Orange County jurisdictions to create effective
housing and land -use policies that has led to the new construction of homes affordable to lower
income working families.
As the City considers the amendments to Anaheim's Density Bonus Ordinance, we request
that the City examine the current and proposed density bonus incentives, its land use
application, and desired outcomes. The City's current Density Bonus Ordinance has been
ineffective in providing policy direction and incentives to create much needed affordable housing
in the City. As highlighted in the City of Anaheim's April 2019 Housing Element Annual
Progress Report for the 2014-2021 planning period that was submitted to the California Housing
and Community Development, the City has a deficit of affordable housing and a surplus in above
market production of housing. The City has permitted over 7,477 housing units during the
current Housing Element period and only 145 total have been in the affordability level of low
and very low. The vast majority of the housing units, 7,332 have been approved at moderate and
above moderate income levels. To -date, the City has outperformed and exceeded their above
moderate -income RHNA requirement constructing 7,182 or 287% of the 21,501 required. 1
Meanwhile, only 124 or 10% of the 1,256 very low-income units and 121 or 13% of the 907 low-
income units have been approved in the C ity. 2 With a remaining total RHNA need of 1,950
lower income homes, it is important the City effectively encourage the development of
affordable homes for lower income households.
The proposed Density Bonus should not merely be updated to address statutory changes. Instead,
amendments should be examined in relationship to development opportunity sites available and
the cities current zoning and development priorities. Thus, far the City has granted re -zonings,
change in land use, increases in densities and development incentives without a direct correlation
to creating opportunities for affordable housing to meet the City's housing needs or
implementing its Density Bonus ordinance. With only a year left in the planning period and with
the City lacking site capacity for its remaining affordable housing needs, it is imperative that the
City of Anaheim prioritize affordable housing on the few remaining opportunity sites and in new
sites being rezoned and being incentivized for housing development. The Council must keep in
I City of Anaheim's 2019 Annual Housing Element Progress Report, p. 3, April 2020.
2City of Anaheim's 2019 Annual Housing Element Progress Report, p. 2, April 2020.
Mayor Harry Sidhu and City Council Members
June 23, 2020
mind that a new and likely larger RHNA allocation will be issued for the City when the new
cycle begins in 2021. If the City continues prioritizing the development of above moderate
housing at the expense of low income housing it will have a difficult time finding sites to meet
its current and its new RHNA requirements.
By providing these generous incentives and rezoning, the City is facilitating development
without considering the objectives of the Density Bonus law which is to increase affordable
housing development. These wholesale land use changes and specific plan zoning that give away
development incentives and density increases are inconsistent with the General Plan and Housing
Elements objectives and are circumventing the Density Bonus law as an affordable housing tool.
The proposed amendments need to address the following:
• How will the proposed changes ensure that density bonus is effective with the
current zoning and land use priorities of the City of Anaheim?
• How will the density bonus changes capture affordable housing opportunities that
are being circumvented by rezones and specific plan zoning that gives density and
incentives without regards to density bonus objectives?
In addition, the City should also consider policies implemented by other cities, like the City
of Irvine and the City of Santa Ana which have both adopted an inclusionary housing
policy that has resulted in robust production of affordable housing. By giving market -rate
developers the option of choosing between making a percentage of their market -rate housing
projects affordable and, alternatively, paying an in -lieu fee, these cities have been able to exceed
Anaheim's production of affordable housing in their respective cities. For example, the City of
Irvine has produced a total of 2,000 units at the very low and low affordability level,' while the
City of Santa Ana has produced 957 units at these affordability levels.' The inclusionary housing
would create a fund that is available to subsidize affordable housing projects, which makes these
projects more competitive when applying for state funds and tax credits.
The Commission looks forward to partnering with the City to increase affordable home
opportunities for lower income households in the City, especially as the City works to address
the impact of COVID- 19 on the housing security of residents. Please keep us informed of any
updates and meetings regarding strategies to increase affordable homes for lower income
households in the City. If you have any questions, please free to contact me at (949) 250-0909 or
cesarcgkennedycommission.org.
Sincerely,
Cesar Covarrubias
Executive Director
3 City of Irvine's 2018 Annual Housing Element Progress Report, March 2019.
4 City of Santa Ana's 2019 Annual Housing Element Progress Report, March 2020.
Page 2 of 2
From: Angel W.
Subject: BLM
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 10:34:57 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is A. Wade, and I am a resident of Oklahoma. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them Were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that Would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
A. Wade
From: City Clerk
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Krina; Trevor
o"Neil
Cc: Amanda Edinger; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios(arianna0communicationslab.com); Cynthia Ward; Daniel
Fierro (danieMpresidiosc.com); David Belmer; Gregory Garcia; Helen Myers; Justin Glover; Karen Romero
Estrada; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Marisol Ramirez; Nam Bartash; Robert Fabela; Samantha Saenz; Sarah
Bartczak; Theresa Bass
Subject: FW: Mayor Sidhu and Anaheim City Clerk
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:58:00 PM
From: Kathy Legal Agency
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:32 PM
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor) <HSidhu@anaheim.net>; City Clerk <cityclerk@anaheim.net>
Subject: Mayor Sidhu and Anaheim City Clerk
Mayor Sidhu,
I saw your resolution against racial injustice today when a friend called me and told me what
you wrote. I read it and I am happy you have made it a point to put this on your agenda to
acknowledge BLACK LIVES MATTER in this way. The American anger went global
because racism is a global problem just as COVID-19 is a global problem. Thank you for
addressing racism and bigotry in our society and commit to fully participate in our goal to
achieve freedom, equality and justice for all Americans. Knowing that all lives do matter we
are paying more attention to the wrong doings that have been done to black people and know
we must correct this.
I have a great amount of respect for what you have done today.
Thank you-
From: Jackie Perez
To: Jordan Brandman; Stephen Faessel; Harry Sidhu (mor); Denise Barnes; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kr[ng; Trevor
O"Neil; Public Comment
Subject: Resolution Against Racial Injustince
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:49:40 PM
Good Evening Anaheim City Council,
As a resident of Anaheim's district two, I want to express my profound disappointment with
this entire council's handling of the resolution against racial injustice and Black Lives Matter. I
was astounded by the ridiculousness of the conversation during the council meeting tonight.
The council missed a huge opportunity to discuss the matters that are important to this
community. It was an incredible waste of time. The residents of this city do not care to hear
about the anniversary of the death of Mr. Brandman's mother, we don't care that you didn't
read the notes because you used an ipad for the conference call.... and we certainly don't care
about all the drama that led up to this resolution.
What we wanted to hear was how Anaheim's "leadership" would stand up against racial
injustice! You failed to demonstrate your commitment to the resolution, and actually
showed us the opposite of what the resolution called for. Let me make it clear that the
residents of Anaheim don't care about symbolic resolutions, we want to see action! This
council needs to do better!! Waaaaay better!! What are you going to do about systematic
racism? You can't even acknowledge the city's racist past or review the budget or
policies to address the needs of the movement.
Mayor Sidhu, I am disappointed that you did not accept Mr. Moreno's amendments to the
resolution. It is clear that Mr. Moreno is the only member of this council that understands what
the racial injustice and BLM movement is about. The protestors that went to the streets of
Anaheim would be proud of Mr. Moreno's attempt to educate the council. I agree with Mr.
Moreno's comments on white supremacist tendencies. The member who called out that she is
of Italian descent and therefore can't be a white surpremaist is a joke and a disgrace to the
people who deal with racism every day. I urge all of the members of this council to educate
yourselves on the matters of systemic racism because you clearly do not understand what is
happening right now. You don't have to be white to be racist, and as leaders of this city you
need to do better in understanding what is happening. I beg that the leadership of this city does
better in meeting the moment and the urgency of the situation.
Mr. Brandman, as my rep of district 2 1 was extremely disappointed that you just wanted to
"get on, with the vote" rather than listen to the discussion. It was incredible that you were
screaming like a child on this call. You didn't answer Mr. Moreno's questions and didn't
propose anything better. You gave me the impression that this matter is not important to you
and that you simply don't want to think about it further to propose something better. You and
Mr. Sidhu simply gave up on listening because you did not want to have the difficult
conversation about racism and white supremacy. It's not enough to just say that you "stand
with BLM " it's more than that. As my representative, I will hold you to a higher standard and
expect you to educate yourself what this moment calls on from our leaders.
To the rest of the council that sat complicit and silent... shame on you. You failed your city as
well by staying quiet. Did you not see the hundreds of protesters out on the city for weeks?
Does that not mean anything to you? I assume that you are sitting on this council because you
care about the community, yet you said nothing about the biggest national movement
happening in our country right now.
And to everyone.... for the love of god... please learn how to mute your phones when you are
not speaking. Please make an attempt to be on an actual computer (not an 1pad) when you are
on such an important meeting so that you are able to fully participate. Council members,
please pay attention during the call. How is it that a regular resident like myself can
understand the amendments, motions, 2nds but you guys were so confused on what was going
on. I lost count of how many times things had to be repeated because the Mayor and other
members didn't understand what was being voted on.
I hope that this email makes you all re-evaluate your inept response to the moment. Feel free
to contact me if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Jackie Perez
Cell:
From: Lesley Valle
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:16:26 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is [YOUR NAME], and I am a resident of [YOUR NEIGHB ORHOOD/Dl STRICT]. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our
concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
[YOUR NAME]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR EMAIL]
[YOUR PHONE NUMBER]
From:
Brianne Ellsworth
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Anaheim City Council meeting comments
Date:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:47:21 PM
Dear Council Members,
My main concerns today are regarding police funding, my adamant opposition of militarizing the police, systemic racism in education
and the dire need for additional community services.
I'd like to thank Council Member Denise Barnes for acknowledging the hundreds of emails sent earlier this month regarding increasing
Anaheim's police budget, unlike Council Member Trevor O'Neil who claims to be in support of making our city safe through increasing
police spending, particularly during the coronavirus. I have yet to understand how militarizing our police benefits our community at any
time, let alone now. Instead, we need increased funding for programs that help address food insecurity, homelessness, mental illness,
employment and rental assistance. Mr. O'Neil you say that you are committed to reducing crime through neighborhood watches so
perhaps you can take this passion and start a program that offers training and education for residents so that we can create active
neighborhood watches, perhaps with the support of police that take the time to get to know the community they are intended to protect.
Our educational system must be revised immediately so that it includes education regarding racism and LGBTQIA rights from a
historical and modern standpoint. This means reviewing what is being taught and who authors the curriculum. It is imperative that we
widen our scope of history so that is not only told from a white persons limited perspective. It must include perspectives of Black
Americans, Indigenous Peoples and the Gay Community, as well as reading assignments written by people from these diverse
backgrounds.
thank you for your time.,
Brianne Ellsworth
Anaheim Resident - District I
From:
8lisba Sasba
To:
City Clerk
Subject:
Letter toCity Council
Date:
ruesday, June 23, 20202:54:55pIVI
Attachments:
Letter to City of Anaheim.pdf
Dear City Councilmembersl
Please find attached a letter for your review and Public Comment at the next City Council
Meeting. The Orange County Sheriff has resumed eviction lockouts. This places many in the
City at risk. Community Legal Aid of SoCal, Heart LA, and the Public Law Center request you
urge the Board of Supervisors and the Orange County Sheriff to postpone these lockouts.
A|ishsSsska | Supervising Attorney, Housing Unit
Community Legal Aid So[e|
2101N.Tustin Ave, Santa Ana, C49I7O5
------------------------------------------
714-571-5250 Direct 714-571-5270 Fax
asaska@dsocaiorg |
LEW
June 231 2020
ll►:19a► T;1II
City of Anaheim
200 South Anaheim Blvd., First Floor
Anaheim, CA 92505
Email: cityclerk@anaheim.net
Dear Councilmembers:
The undersigned legal services organizations write to urge you to protect your most vulnerable residents and
request that the County Board of Supervisors ask the orange County Sheriff's Department suspend the pending
155 evictions that were set to start June 11 2020 for the duration of the State of Emergency relating to COVID-19
and an additional thirty days following the termination of the State of Emergency. California remains in a state
of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the number have grown substantially, with more than two
million cases nationwide. The County of orange recently reported approximately 10,595 cumulative cases of
COVI D-19, 175 active cases, and 259 deaths from COVI D-19.1 Despite efforts to reopen and relax rules governing
the face coverings in public, the increase in cases and deaths, should cause the City of Anaheim pause, especially
in light of those who are amid eviction and at risk of homelessness. The City must not countenance a result.
Our organization provides critical legal services to low-income communities, which includes, but is not limited
to, tenant counseling and eviction defense and we each advocate for the rights of low-income tenants. We serve
clients and communities to ensure equal access to the justice system for people who could not otherwise afford
attorneys.
In previous correspondence with the Board of Supervisors, we explained that suspending the enforcement of
eviction orders is not only critical for protecting public health, but that it is within the powers of the Board of
Supervisors to do s0.2 Suspending the enforcement of eviction orders will ensure that families do not become
homeless when they are legally required to shelter in place and will reduce the risk of exposure for your
deputies. In Orange County, there are already close to 7,000 unsheltered individuals.
On April 5, 2020, the Judicial Council adopted a rule that effectively stays all eviction proceedings and judicial
foreclosure proceedings throughout the State of California and continues all eviction trials, for a period
extending after the end of the State of Emergency. The rule applies regardless of the reason for the eviction. On
'See O.C. COVID-19 Grange County Case Counts, available at Iattps:lloccovidl 9.ochealthinfo.com/co_ronavirus-in-ac
(current data posted as of June 22, 2020).
2 CA Gov. Code § 25303 ("The Board of Supervisors is responsible for supervising `the official conduct of all county
officers, and officers of all districts and other subdivisions of the County... "'). See also .Brewster v. Shasta Cty., 275 F.3d
8031 809-10 (9th Cir. 2001) (establishing an affirmative duty of the Board of Supervisors to supervise the conduct of all
county official including the sheriff so long as the supervision does not interfere with the investigation of a crime.)
3 Latest Point in Time Count Finds Almost 7000 Homeless People in Orange County, available at
https.%/www.latimes. com/socal/daily-pilot/news/tn-ddpt-me-pit-conn t-resul ts-20190424-story. html
June 101, 2020, the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court suspended a planned vote to repeal the
emergency rule after August 3, 2020.4 Accordingly, the emergency rules related to evictions and judicial
foreclosures are still in effect.
The Judicial Council's emergency rules and the heightening public crisis arising out of the COVID-19 pandemic
protect Californians from eviction for newly filed and pending actions, but leaves unresolved the status of
people against whom a court had already issued an eviction order. The fate of these households is in your
hands, and they are just as in need of protection from the public health crisis as the households who will be
protected by the Judicial Council's rule.
Accordingly, we urgently request that you agree to suspend enforcement of any and all pending eviction orders,
unless they are directly related to a protective order (e.g., a TRS] issued by a court related to domestic violence
and/or elder dependent abuse), during the State of Emergency and at least ninety days thereafter.
We ask that you please inform us by date/time of your position, by emailing or calling Ugochi Anaebere-
Nicholson, at unicholson@publiclawcenter.org, or at 714-541-1010 x 280, Dianne Prado, at dianne@heartla.org
or at 323-043-44301, or Kate Marr, at kmarrclsocal.org or at 714-571-5218 .
Sincerely,
/s/ % '4"dwM-
Ugochi Anaebere-Nicholson
Directing Attorney, Housing and Homelessness Prevention Unit
Public Law Center
0
Dianne Prado
Executive Director
Housing Equality & Advocacy Resource Team
V-(
Kate Marr
Executive Director
Community Legal Aid SoCa I
4 Chief Justice Suspends Mote on Eviction, Foreclosure Emergency Rules, available at
https://newsroom.courts.ca_.gov/news/
chief-'ustice-sus ends-vote-on-eviction-foreclosure-emer enc -rules (last visited
June 12, 2020.)
From:
ASTA President
To:
Loretta Day; Public Comment
Subject:
Black Lives Matter Resolution
Date:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:42;11 PM
Attachments:
PR -- Racial & Social Justice-pd
Mr. Mayor and City Council,
Please see the attached press release from the Anaheim Secondary Teachers Association
regarding social justice and the Black Lives Matter movement. We call on the City of
Anaheim to make the same commitment to address institutional racism and take action to
bring equity and access to all people in our community. We look forward to our city J wining
the cause.
Sincerely,
Grant Schuster
President
Anaheim Secondary Teachers Association
ANAHEIM SECONDARY
lj� TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
@ASTAAnaheim I #WeAreASTA
H�J.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 06/11/2020
ASTA Supports Teachers & Students in Fight for Equality
Association Announces Launch of Racial & Social Justice Committee
Anaheim, CA: The Executive Board of the Anaheim Secondary Teachers Association
(ASTA) stands behind the students and teachers that have been on the frontlines of
the demonstrations in support of George Floyd and others that have experienced
racial injustice and/or police brutality. We are proud of all the educators that are
continuously mentoring, counseling, parenting and coaching our students during this
national crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. ASTA members have always gone out of
their way to provide more than just an excellent educational experience for students,
they have provided community leadership.
However, we are committed to do more. We can and must do more to practice
inclusivity. We can and must do more to become aware of our unconscious biases to
gain broader perspectives of other's lives and experiences. We can and must do more
to facilitate conversations about culture and race that shed a light on discriminatory
practices. We can and must do more because the institutionalized racism that exists in
the United States extends beyond the justice system. It lingers in all aspects of
American life, and neither teacher unions nor the education system are exempt from
its impacts.
As we move forward to expand our conversations about racial and social justice,
ASTA would like to announce the creation of an ASTA Racial & Social Justice
Committee to help facilitate future dialogue and actions centered on equity and access
in education and in our school community. We stand in solidarity with our black
community. #BlackLives Matter
About ASTA: Anaheim Secondary Teachers Association is a group of unionized
educators working in Anaheim Union High School District. For more information, visit
our website (www.ASTAAnaheim.org) or follow us on social media (@ASTAAnaheim).
rNwIffiffilyffinalffil
50 S. Anaheim Blvd., Suite 300, Anaheim CA 1 (714) 399-1882 1 www.ASTAAnaheim.ofg
From: Lesley Valle
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor)
Subject: Defund The Police
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:24:30 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Lesley, and I am a resident of the West District. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Lesley
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Cherish Sally
Public Comment
DISNEYLAND SHOULD NOT OPEN
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:36:31 PM
DISNEYLAND SHOULD NOT OPEN
Hello,
I am a cast member at Disneyland and I feel unsafe coming back to work. It is extremely unsafe with the second
wave. PLEASE RECONSIDER. Disneyland isn't essential.
Sent from my Whone
From:
Daniel Duenas
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Please DO NOT approve the Disney re -open
Date:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:45:08 PM
Mayor Sidhu & City Council Members of Anaheim,
I thank you for your leadership and active response to both a global pandemic and a national cry for equality. My
hope is to find support for myself and fellow Disneyland Resort employees (Cast Members).
I request that you reject the Disneyland Resort's proposal to re -open the Parks come 17 July, 2020.
Although there are means to control certain variables with Guests, the Resort currently does not have the ability to
offer sufficient assurance that the work environment will be safe for their staff.
The proposals offered to Union Representatives is unsatisfactory and the environment doesn't accommodate:
-Social Distancing in Break Spaces
-Access to sufficient cleaning supplies in Break Spaces
-On-site testing for Cast Members
-On-site temperature checks for Cast Members
There are a number of High -Risk individuals who work at the Resort. Add that to the number of Cast Members who
live with High -Risk individuals and we put, quite literally, thousands of lives at risk.
I understand that people want this season to end, but pretending the Covid- 19 Pandemic is over by opening a theme
park won't make it a reality. It will simply push back our efforts even further.
Council, please, I implore you to think of the lives and well-being of all the individuals that live in Anaheim. The
individuals that will have to interact with people from all over the world, 40+ hours a week, and expose themselves
to a deadly virus— for what? A cartoon mouse's birthday?
Best Regards,
Victor Daniel Duenas
District 4 Resident of Anaheim
From:
Corina Aguilar
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Please read
Date:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:49:41 PM
Hello Council members!
Hope you guys are having a great day.
My name is Corina Aguilar. I'm writing because Officer Nick Bennallack took
four love ones away from four different families. We want Nick Bennallack to
pay for his actions. We don't want to see another family get hurt by this
man. He does not deserve to serve and protect the city of Anaheim he does
not deserve to wear that badge. He is making our good officers look bad.
Please help the Ramirez family and three other families get JUSTICE!
Clean Anaheim Police Department out. Let are good officers shine and our
Sick officers pay their for their actions.
Not all officers are bad but there are some who became mentally ill or has
let their anger and pass experience get the best of them. Those sick officers
has destroyed families.
Below is the petition we are asking everyone to sign. We ask you to please
be open your hearts and understand where we are coming from.
Anaheim Police Officer Nick Bennallack, who is now on the SWAT team,
cherishes his image as a real tough gunslinger — he and his colleagues like
to refer to him as "Nick BUCKSHOT Bennallack." However, some us us call
him "Backshot," for his tendency to shoot his victims while their back is
turned. We are just now learning about his fourth victim, Daniel Ramirez,
April 4, 2019.
One of the tensest moments of my wife's life was when her oldest son — in a
case of completely mistaken identity —was held at riflepoint by this trigger -
happiest of Anaheim policemen, until the cops realized they had the wrong
guy.
That was around 2014, when Backshot had already killed two young men.
The first was 30 -year-old Filipino -American father Bernie Villegas, who got
Anaheim cops nervous when they heard he was walking around his
apartment complex with a gun ... which turned out to be a b -b gun, a
birthday present for his son. Well, Officer Nick took care of that worry, by
shooting good old happy-go-lucky Bernie in the back five times, without a
warning. That was in January 2012. Bernie's family failed to prevail in
court, and this was BEFORE the District Attorney began issuing reports, so
nothing to link to there.
But six months later Nick messed with the wrong family, the wrong mother,
when he shot unarmed, 25 -year-old Manuel Diaz twice, in the butt and the
back of the head. Nick CLAIMED to have thought the fleeing young man's
cell phone was a gun. This was Anaheim's penultimate police killing (of
eight mostly Latino young men in twelve months, mostly unarmed) that led
to the riots of 2012 and some modest reforms. (They killed Joel Acevedo
the next night.)
The DA at the time, Tony Rackauckas, ALWAYS managed to find every
police killing justified, but Manuel's mother Genevieve Huizar took it to court
with the aid of ace civil rights attorney Dale Galipo, and in 2017 a civil jury
reached a finding of " excessive force" against Bennallack for Manuel's
killing (and awarded her an insultingly modest sum.) No consequences
were forthcoming for "Backshot."
Some time around 2015 or so there were a lot of protesters out in front of an
Anaheim City Council meeting — probably something to do with us trying to
get district elections — so they thought they'd better get a bunch of cops out
front to keep order, and one of them was Backshot Bennallack. I'd probably
had a couple of drinks, when I turned my back to the cop and taunted him,
"Don't shoot me now, Nick!" Probably a foolhardy thing to do, but it's fun to
look back on.
I didn't know at the time that he had also recently shot and killed an
ACTUAL ARMED MAN in Sept. 2014, alleged armed robber Steen Thomas
Parker (right) outside of a Fry's Electronics. Assuming the police's story
was true and the DA's investigation was honest (always two huge if's) this
old guy actually was firing at the cops from his SUV. Still The Patch got
Parker's age at 43 when it was actually 65, so who knows.
And NOW we hear, a year after the fact, about Bennallack's FOURTH
killing, April 4 of 2019. 1 had missed the story back then about a guy
"barricaded in an attic" shot fatally while coming down the stairs, but it turns
out that was Backshot striking again, and the victim was another 30 -year old
father, Daniel Robert Ramirez III. (still waiting for a picture)
And Dale Galipo, who won the excessive force verdict in the Manuel Diaz
case, and last year won a whopping $13.2 million verdict against Anaheim
for the choking death of Vincent Valenzuela, is representing Ramirez' family
in the wrongful death suit — complaint here.
It was early one morning in West Anaheim (north Harcourt Street) and Irvine
cops were up here executing a search warrant for some stolen guitars and
amps. According to the Times story, the Irvine cops arrested two men at
the house on outstanding warrants, and on hearing sounds from a garage
attic called Anaheim PD for backup. Two men were in the attic and refused
to come down until tear gas was deployed up there. One came down
peacefully and was taken into custody. Then Daniel also came down
peacefully, as ordered... and Bennallack shot him multiple times.
Why? Anaheim police told the Times they thought they heard someone in
the attic " make verbal statements they would shoot officers." But NOW
Anaheim cops have body cameras, and it appears the two men in the attic
were only asking NOT to be shot. And they were unarmed. When the
press writes that "it's not clear that Ramirez was the suspect" for the alleged
guitar theft, that means he wasn't. Accused of nothing, unarmed, Daniel
Ramirez was shot multiple times by Nick "Backshot" Bennallack while
complying with orders and coming down from the attic, and then was denied
medical care long enough to bleed to death.
It's been over a year with no DA report which also feeds suspicions. We'll
have more details in the coming months, as the attorney Dale Galipo shares
them with us. But it's long past time that repeat killers like Nick Bennallack
should no longer be policemen. It's time to clean house, Anaheim!
**We will march again for Daniel Robert Ramirez III on July 18 at 2pm
Daniel was a very caring and loving man and he was violently taken from us
by police brutality. He left behind a beautiful daughter that he loved dearly.
#BernieVillegas
#ManuelDiaz
#SteenThomasParker
Please come join us in our March to get justice for Daniel.
#nojusticenopeace
Sent from my Whone
From: Stephanie Wade
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public Comments for Tonight"s 6/23 Council Meeting Re: Items 26 and 27
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:39:55 PM
{ apologize for submitting these comments aolate. { hope they can boread into the record of
tonight's council meeting (RE: Items 26 and 27).
Dear Mayor Sidhu and Council Members,
Thank you for receiving my comments. I only moved to Anaheim in Anaheim in April of 2020, so
less than ayear but am, nevertheless very proud to call it myhome. But |have written to you to
say that the pride we feel for the city will be far better placed if you succeed in passing both of
Mayor Sidhu's resolutions this evening. And while I am greatly in sympathy with the
resolution commending the community's peaceful protests, I am more concerned that we pass the
clear indication of our su,pport for African Americans by passing the Black Lives Matter. As a white
person, and as a student of history, I applaud the council, in advance, for taking this small but
important step towards healing America's original and still present sin. The past, as they say, isn't
even past and progress is only about catching up to the present. Black Lives Matter! Say it
Pronouns: She, Her, Hers
Stephanie Wade
Resident ofDistrict 3
Anaheim, CA
From: Itzel Valle
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Stop the violence
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:08:39 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is itzel , and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you.
From: Edgar Arellano
To: Public Comment; Harr) Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Lucille Krin- ; lose
Moreno; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: You"re Violating our rights!
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:17:02 PM
Your decision last week to approve the acquisition of surveillance technology equipments for
the Anaheim PD is in direct violation of US Law.
It is embarrassing that you are voicing statements of support for "change" yet you will
continue to approve direct affronts to our community calls for change.
It is embarrassing that you continue to be hoodwinked by PD to continue giving them
unnecessary equipment, staff, and bloated salaries.
It is embarrassing that you cannot find ways to slip out of their exploitation of our budget &
City.
It is so incredibly embarrassing that you may fear a spike in crime & violence with less PD
activity; across the nation PD unions have bemoaned budget cuts &'threatened" with less
police engagement as a bargaining tool.
The same fear of crime & violence is being used to violate our 4th & 5th amendment rights.
The PD must be proud to gain another tool to show off as it violates our rights as US citizens.
in Carpenter v. USA. httl2s-://www.supremecourt.gov/oipinions/1712df/16-4O2—h3l5.pd
A majority of the Court has already recognized that individuals have a reasonable
expectation of privacy in the whole of their physical movements. Allowing government access
to cell -site records which "hold for many Americans the 'privacies of life,' " Riley v.
California, 573 U. S. —, --contravenes that expectation. In fact, historical cell -site
records present even greater privacy concerns than the GPS monitoring considered in Jones:
They give the Government near perfect surveillance and allow it to travel back in time to
retrace a person's whereabouts, subject only to the five-year retention policies of most
wireless carriers.
I demand that you recall your vote & decline the continued overenforcement & violation of
our community.
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner
District 2
Public Comments Distributed to the Anaheim City Council
June 23, 2020 Council Meeting
Updated 3:00 P.M. —Wednesday, June 24, 2020
From:
Elle Parsons
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
1*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date:
Friday, June 19, 2020 11:21:16 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Elle Parsons, and I am a resident of your district. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Elle Parsons
Sent from my iPhone
From: Gabriella Cuevas
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Change MUST COME
Date: Friday, June 19, 2020 11:11:58 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Gabriella Cuevas, and I am a resident of CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Gabriella Cuevas
From:
Jamie Reeves
To:
Jamie,
Subject:
Public Safety
Date:
Thursday,, June 18, 2020 10:30:36 PM
Hello,
I am writing today to vouch for how imperative it is that we defund the police. We need to view public safety in a
way that does not make Black, LGBTQ+, low income people unsafe.
Sincerely,
Jamie Reeves
From: Molly Johnson
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund Anaheim Police, Invest in Community Health
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2020 6:25:01 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Molly Johnson and I am writing today to urge you to reduce funding for and limit
the reach of the police in Anaheim and adopt a budget that prioritizes community wellbeing.
We should be investing in community services, social programs, narrowing income inequality,
and other forms of public safety that treat the causes of harm in communities.
These past weeks, our nation has been gripped by protests calling for rapid and meaningful
reevaluation of the role of policing in our communities and an end to endemic police brutality
against Black Americans. The police as an institution are broken; they do little to prevent
crime and do more harm than good to the communities they are supposed to serve. I believe
that changes will begin by defunding law enforcement and investing in community programs
and infrastructure.
It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately
affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5" that will use $ 10000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Thank you,
Molly Johnson
From:
Daniel Salgado
Subject:
Defunding the police
Date:
Thursday, June 18, 2020 11:10:04 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Daniel and I am a resident of District 3. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Daniel Salgado
From: Denise M
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: REQUEST FOR REALLOCATION OF FUNDING FOR ANAHEIM PD
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2020 10:17:47 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Denise Rodney, and I am a resident of Anaheim, C.A. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Denise Rodney
Sent from my lPhone
From: Pauldean Piere
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: A Simple Request
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2020 9:36:12 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Pauldean Tamras Piere, and I am a resident of Fountain Valley, CA. I hope that you are well. I am
writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a
radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in
Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
I hope that you have a great day.
Thank you,
Pauldean Tamras Piere
fountain valley ca, 92708
From: Kirsten W
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Trevor o"Neil
Subject: Anaheim Police Budget
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 10:42:16 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Kirsten Wong, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and
some of the most ►well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-
2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -
related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than
the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money
on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be
halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police
vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during
a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Kirsten Wong
From: Alex
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: The problems at hand
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 6:47:10 PM
My name is Alexander Hwang. I am a resident of Los Angeles. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become abundantly
apparent that a major shift in our concept of policing and community health must
occur at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would needlessly spend
$700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality
protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the
council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. I
recommend that the money instead be invested in creating programs that benefit and
enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Thank you,
Alexander Hwang
From: Alyssa
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund 12
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 6:33:45 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Alyssa Parungao, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Alyssa Parungao
From: Pauldean Piere
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: A Simple Request
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 10:38:56 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Pauldean Tamras Piere, and I am a resident of Fountain Valley, CA. I hope you are well. I am writing in
deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in
our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
I hope you have a great day.
Thank you,
Pauldean Tamras Piere
fountain valley, ca 92708
From: Olivia Russ
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: I write not as a resident of your city, but as a concerned citizen of the US
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 9:45:23 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Olivia Russ, and I am a resident of Murrieta, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Olivia Russ
From: arianna fuentes
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Take Initiative! Police Reform Is NEEDED
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 8:28:18 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Arianna, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim, 3rd District, community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Arianna Fuentes
Anaheim 92805 CA
From: Carly Conrad
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Policing budget
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 6:46:20 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Campbell, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Campbell
Sent from my iPhone
From: Brenda Tais Ochoa
To: Public Comment; Denise Barnes; Harry Sidhu (Mayor; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Krina; Stephen
Faessel; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Police Violence
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:17:57 PM
My name is Brenda Ochoa and I am a resident of [Anaheim Union District. I am
writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has
become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim
has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come
to an end.
From: Jamie Reeves
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defunding the Police
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:31:53 PM
Hello Anaheim City Council,
We need to change the way we view public safety, and move away from the era of policing. The modern law
enforcement system is directly bred out of the slave patrols in the early 1700s.
The attempts to reform, or improve, the racist institution of policing may never be sufficient, and therefore I am
calling to defund to police.
I would also like to ask you what you are personally doing to reduce police brutality, and if you are on the boat to
defund the police?
Sincerely,
Jamie Reeves
From: Susie Lee
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Redistribute funds from Anaheim PD into local community services, public transit, and education
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 7:59:19 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Susie Lee, and I am a resident of Anaheim, CA. The fact that Anaheim's 2019-
2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community
development is appalling and unacceptable. I demand that the city council not approve
"Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance
technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance
be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to
improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, I demand you invest that money in creating programs that
benefit and enrich the community. It is time for the elected members of our community to
rightfully fulfill their duties. Redistribute the money; serve your community; protect your
community or forfeit your positions.
Sincerely,
Susie Lee
From: Mario Revolori
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund Police
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 7:12:08 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Mario Revolori and I am a resident of Los Angeles but was barn and raised in Anaheim, CA. I am
writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a
radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in
Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Mario Revolori
From: ana montano
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: HEY LISTEN UP
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 6:55:42 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Ana Montano, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Ana Montano
Sent from my iPhone
From: Jonathan Mendivil
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: ACAS!
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:27:10 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jonathan, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Jonathan Mendivil
Sent from my iPhone
From: Giovanna Pacheco
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:41:06 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Giovanna Pacheco, and I am a resident of Anaheim, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of
the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Giovanna Pacheco
Sent from my iPhone
From: Jay Cazel
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police Dept, Tax the Rich and Fund a "New Deal" for your Residents
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:47:46 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jim,
I live and work in Anaheim and I implore you to defund the police department SIGNIFICANTLY this fiscal year
and get on a path to replacing the police force entirely. These millions of dollars could and should go directly to
programs that better the lives of your residents. In addition TAX your rich corporations and residents, create jobs
with that money to fix up your community, to provide mental health care and substance use harm reduction/
treatment, fix the streets, free food and activity programs for kids, parks, helping the elderly live independantly.
Unarmed workers in their own neighborhoods trained in deescalation, mental healthcare and first aid, more city
employed paramedics to respond to medical emergencies and car accidents (that are not employees of a company
out to make a profit,) enough jobs with fair wages for your poor residents plus real funded programs for those who
dont fit into the job market due to mental or other disability will literally solve all the problems that police respond
to. I don't wanna hear it about gangs. The police are the biggest armed gang in our city, they are costing us lives and
tens of millions of dollars each year. They do not have the support or respect of your constituency because they have
lost it, or in the case of poor people, black people and people of color —failed to ever earn it. I urge you to defund
the Walnut Creek Police Department effective this quarter. See further information below.
Thanks for reading,
Jim
My name is Jim, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim
community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must
take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents
and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of ant' -police brutal' I
survel I brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Jim
Anaheim Resident
From: Pauldean Piere
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police NOW
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 9:28:56 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Pauldean Tamras Piere, and I am a resident of Fountain Valley, CA. I hope you are well. I am writing in
deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in
our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
I hope you have a great day.
Thank you,
Pauldean Tamras Piere
fountain valley ca, 92708
From: Andrew Guerrero
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Please Reconsider Budget
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:08:56 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Andrew Guerrero, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern
for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical
shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end. In the instances where I felt police might be of service, I was only further
victimized. The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the
largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments
in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development. Anaheim is the 9th most violent
police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people
during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of
arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD
and is 74% higher than the average for police in California. I demand that the city council not
approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to
surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use
$10000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that
benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic. I am calling on our
elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned
community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Thank you
Andrew Guerrero
Anaheim Ca 92801
From: Edgar Arellano
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Please add to next council agenda
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 11:53:21 PM
Hello councilmembers,
I'm writing you again to demand that you reconsider your decisions this past Tuesday to
approve further funds for police equipment. With predicted loss of revenues, it is prudent that
you save on frivolous expenditures. You approved —$850,000 on equipment that will be used
to terrorize and/or abuse our community, as seen in the recent decade punctuated with unrest
while our city grew our police force to "Pre -recession levels".
Please bring back up for discussion, 1) the scope of the use of the surveillance equipment. 2) if
there were RFPs issued for equipment/services 3) reductions to the police budget for
reallocations to other budget items, particularly those that will help us navigate our city out of
COVID 19 impacts. Defund the police.
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner District 2
From, MARTHA SALAZAR.
To: Public Comment; Stephen Fae:ssel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Boandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
KrinuZcevor O2Neil
Subject: renoopreountas
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 9:58:39 PM
Attn: Miembmadel Cono|io
Porque aprobaron tanto dinero para que nos espIen sudepartarnento de policia?
Yomeposondeobumivoayustedeales miguendandodemoaiododinempara queaiguencon sus vio|ooionesde
nuestraoomunidod.
Les opmbomn3ohos!!Tombienoomo$75O.00Oentiempoaquea000upaahorroryinverUren|000munidod.
(]uenos vobenefidar3a�oadee|usodeeste equipopara espior?Por favor enm6henomdonde eataesohuoque
nopuedenabumordel umodeaucepao)dadpara eapiar.Mas bien'porfavor reohooemuvotopara apmboreste
gostoexcesivo.
Aporte.noeotoydeacuerdoqueapmbamnqueusen$1OO'000para que|opo|ioiapuedeumar1Omamcarmm.No
mossepasanmenejondocomoondanenoarrerae.Para queocupontanto como?
Enestootiempommejormevieronaponerahomarrodoe|dinoroquepuedan.eapooia|menuaaivaser umodopara
obusardenuestnacomunidad.Yobostacon dodestanto dinema|opo|ioieaihanuanidotantahistoriedeobumar
nuostna comunidad.
Martha Salazar
ReoidenteyNegmciame'Distrito 2
From: Philys Og
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu(Mayor); Ste®hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: Anaheim community refuse to remain silent
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 5:27:38 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Philys Og and I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has
become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the
local level. Police violence in Anaheim has affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end. Now.
The US does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of the
most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Did you know that Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police
Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed? Is this something
you are aware of? If so why stand by and let this continue to happen? Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths
caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve `Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
DO SOMETHING. We as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further
terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Philys Cog
From: Jessie Beadnell
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; lose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: 33 citizens in 13 years
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 4:56:53 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jessica Beadnell. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of
policing and community health must take place at the local level.
Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and
that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on the elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We refuse
to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize the community.
Thank you,
Jessica Beadnell
From: Briana Sundlie
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Urgent
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 4:54:57 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Briana, and I am a resident of Los Alamitos, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Briana Sundlie
Los Alamitos, CA 90720
Sent from my iPhone
From: Julia Kitlinski-Hong
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Nei l
Subject: defunding the Anaheim police
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 3:37:48 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Julia Kitlinski-Hong, and I am a resident of Orange County. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that
a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local
level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents
and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Thank you,
Julia
From: Shacihayegh Baghbaderani
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu CMayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: URGENT
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 2:38:07 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Lydia and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Lydia Walters
From: Alison Ton
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: URGENT
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 2:25:57 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Alison Ton and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Alison Ton
From: Samantha B.
To: Public Comment
Subject: Re: Public Comment Received
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 1:23:27 PM
Thank you for your response.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:53 PM Public Comment cpubliccomment &,anaheim.net> wrote:
The City is in receipt of your public comment. Your comment will be distributed to
the City Council for their consideration and made part of the public record of the
City Council meeting.
From:
Samantha B.
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Funding for Education, Not the Police!
Date:
Monday, June 15, 2020 12:53:48 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Samantha Brugman and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern
for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical
shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community programs.
Please remember that as a citizen of this world, the youth of my generation look to you as an
example of what to do in times of need. You have to opportunity to foster the minds of young
adults in a positive way! Fund education and housing instead of giving to the police
department!
Sincerely,
Samantha Brugman
Resident of Anaheim for 16 Years
High School Student
From: Jerry Hernandez
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police!
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 12:20:23 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jerry Hernandez and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Jerry Hernandez
From: Liza Miller
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: DEFUND POLICE
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 11:29:51 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Liza Miller. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has
become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the
local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Liza Miller
From: Micah Bradshaw
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 10:26:57 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Micah Bradshaw and I am a resident of Anaheim, Ca. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Micah Bradshaw
Sent from mylPhone
From: Amanda Graff
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: Defund Anaheim Police
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 9:10:51 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Amanda Graff, and I am a concerned, out of state citizen. This past week, our
nation has been gripped by protests calling for rapid and meaningful reevaluation of the role of
policing in our communities and an end to endemic police brutality against Black Americans. I
believe that changes will begin by defending law enforcement and investing in community
programs and infrastructure.
Police presence has been proven time and time again to be ineffective at protecting the citizens
of the community. Often, police presence results in the death of a person of color, and
particularly Black Americans. I am outraged by the incompetence of city officials and their
lack of attention to the police department's use of excessive force against the people,
especially POC. Police have terrorized the community for too long, and I am asking that you
put a stop to it.
Research shows that a living wage., access to holistic health services and treatment,
educational opportunity, and stable housing are far more successful at promoting community
safety than police or prisons (Source: Popular Democracy). The funds that Anaheim has
budgeted for law enforcement and incarceration should be redirected into COVID- 19 relief,
affordable housing, education, healthcare, community centers, addiction treatment, and
community -led organizations. Anaheim would be better served by dedicating resources to
programs that are more effective at promoting safety and social equity than policing and
incarceration.
Ask yourself what side of history you want to be on. I hope that you choose the side of the
people.
Black Lives Matter,
Amanda Graff
Indivisible Mass Coalition, Inc.
Director, Congressional District 7
From: Pauldean Piere
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 9:10:39 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Pauldean Tamras Piere, and I am a resident of Fountain Valley, CA. I hope you are well. I am writing in
deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in
our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
I hope you have a great day.
Thank you,
Pauldean Tamras Piere
fountain valley, ca 92708
From: alfasa
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police
Date: Monday, June 15, 2020 2:37:57 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jasper Dwyer, and I am a resident of Irvine, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Jasper Dwyer
From: Jessica Arredondo
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 10:05:46 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jessica Arredondo, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern
for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical
shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end. The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we
have the largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police
departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8
million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development. Anaheim is the
9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department
killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since
20141 the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD,
and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California. I demand that
the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer
surveillance technology of ant' -police brutal' projects
money on survel I brutality protests and that any future pr '
related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5"
that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating
programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic. I am
calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community. Thank you, Jessica
From: Face
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 9:41:28 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Dylan (Amos, and I am a resident of Santa Ana. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Santa Ana, CA 92703
Sent from my iPhone
From: Saga Darnell
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Caring for Community
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 8:36:16 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Saga Darnell. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has
become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the
local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on elected officials to stop criminalizing community members. This concerned community refuses to
remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize this community.
Thank you,
Saga Darnell
From: Audrey Saye
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Change Starts NOW
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 7:56:29 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Audrey and I am here to uplift the voices of the #BLACKLIVE SMATTER and
urge you to consider taking steps to address racism and police brutality in Anaheim.
I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become
more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take
place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development. How can this be? How can we
continue to allocate our budget like this, especially in the midst of a global pandemic? Now,
more than ever, the need for community health care resources is evident. We cannot ignore
this, we must address this head-on and create long-term change. Health comes first-- and right
now, this country is hurting. Will you help heal this country?
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5" that will use $ 10000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community. Together we can and will make a difference.
Thank you,
Audrey Sayer
From: Jamie Reeves
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: Rethinking Police Budget
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 6:59:43 PM
Hello Local Officials,
I am asking for the complete and total defunding of the police. I am asking for you to halt using taxpayer dollars,
provided by me and my neighbors, to sponsor a force that makes my Black neighbors live in fear.
I want our city to adopt a new model of public safety- one that serves not only our white populations, but our black
and POC communities as well. Please care for our Black communities, and do your part! Speak up! Make change!
Do anything!
Signed,
Jamie Reeves
From: Breanon Kratzer
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: It is time for CHANGE
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 6:23:19 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Breanon Kratzer, and I am a resident of Santa Ana, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of
the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Breanon Kratzer
Santa Ana CA, 92706
From: Jessica Salas
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund Anaheim Police
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 5:56:19 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jessica Salas, and I am a 17 year old resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of
the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Jessica Salas
Stanton, CA 90680
Sent from mylPhone
From: Jessica Mc Adams
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: End police brutality!!!!!
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 5:52:28 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jessica Mc Adams, and I am a resident of Aliso Viejo, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health
of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Jessica Mc Adams
Aliso Viejo CA 92656
Sincerely,
Jessica Mc Adams
From: Sydney Walters
To: Public Comment
Subject: No on Resolution 5,19 & 30
Date: Sunday,, June 14, 2020 12:36:01 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Sydney and I am close friends with residents in your district. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that
a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local
level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents
and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Francisco PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in
California, according to a 2017 study by the ACLU.
WE DEMAND that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that
any future projects related to surveillance be halted. We also DEMAND that the council not
approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. We DEMAND
that the city council not approve "Resolution 30" proclaiming the continuing existence of a
local emergency regarding civil unrest, which will continue to criminalize peaceful
i2rQtestors. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
We are calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
In solidarity with friends,
Sydney
From:
Subject: Time to stop picking your asses and do something
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 12:10:33 PM
I am a resident of Anaheim City and I am calling for the abolition of Anaheim Police.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California. I
demand that the $800,000 you're considering being put into funding the police be destributed.
To restate: I demand you abolish the police force and redistribute these finances to other
programs such as healthcare, child care, housing, education, etc.
Sincerely,
Black Lives Matter
From: Brittany Searnster
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund Anaheim Police
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 11:35:01 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Brittany Searnster, and I am a resident of Yorba Linda I am writing in deep concern for the health of
the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Brittany Seamster
Sent from my iPhone
From: Sarah
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Heal our communities
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 11:30:31 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Sarah Doppler,
and I am a resident of Golden Gate, Emeryville CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global.
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Sarah Doppler
Emeryville California
From: Maidaly Quong
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: INVEST IN OUR COMMUNITY
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 11:19:42 AM
I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It
has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim
has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to
an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have
the largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized
police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community
development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016,
Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and
nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths
caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is
74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend
$700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police
brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I
also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to
improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that
benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members.
We as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to
further terrorize our community.
From: Lexi Bennett
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: WE MUST REDISTRIBUTE FUNDS
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 9:25:10 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Alexa Bennett, and I am a resident of Long Beach. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Alexa. Bennett
From: Hannah Kong
To: Public Comment
Subject: No on Resolution 5,19 & 30
Date: Sunday,, June 14, 2020 9:00:02 AM
My name is Hannah Kong and I am a resident of Central Anaheim. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that
a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local
level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents
and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Francisco PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in
California, according to a 2017 study by the ACLU.
WE DEMAND that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that
any future projects related to surveillance be halted. We also DEMAND that the council not
approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. We DEMAND
that the city council not approve "Resolution 30" proclaiming the continuing existence of a
local emergency regarding civil unrest, which will continue to criminalize peaceful
protestors. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
We are calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Hannah Kong
From:
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Please Defund the Police Dept!
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2020 2:03:00 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Emilie Pichot. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has
become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the
local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
If Minneapolis City Council can do it, we can!
Emilie Pichot
From: Leila Etemad
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 11:23:09 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Leila Etemad, and I am a resident of Novato, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Leila Etemad
Novato, CA 94949
From: Diana Guevara
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Resident Comment re: Resolutions 5, 19 etc
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 10:29:56 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Diana Guevara and I am a resident of Anaheim Hills. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Respectfully,
Diana Guevara
Anaheim Hills, CA 92808
From: Shannon woo
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: [*** DEFUND POLICE
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 7:25:13 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Shannon Woo, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Shannon Woo
Anaheim, CA 92804
From: Brandon Pu
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Reduce Funding for the Police
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 5:29:28 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Brandon Pu, and I am a resident of Buena Park. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Brandon Pu
Buena Park, CA 90620
From: lizzybedodd99
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Nei l
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 3:50:04 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:<br >
<br >
My name is Elizabeth Dodd and I am a resident of Hughson, CA. I am writing in deep concern
for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical
shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.<br >
<br >
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.<br >
<br >
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
<br >
<br >
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5" that will use $ 10000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.<br >
<br >
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.<br >
<br >
Elizabeth Dodd<br >
Sent from my MetroPCS 4G LTE Android Device
From: Ashley Arechiga
To: Public Comment
Subject: No on Resolution 5,19 & 30
Date: Saturday, June 13,, 2020 3:15:14 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Ashley Arechiga and I am a resident of District 4 of Anaheim. I am writing in
deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear
that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the
local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown
residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Francisco PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in
California, according to a 2017 study by the ACLU.
WE DEMAND that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that
any future projects related to surveillance be halted. We also DEMAND that the council not
approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. We DEMAND
that the city council not approve "Resolution 30" proclaiming the continuing existence of a
local emergency regarding civil unrest, which will continue to criminalize ceful
protestors. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
We are calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Ashley Arechiga
From: Katy Gerber
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: Defund Anaheim PD and Reallocate Funds to Community Support Services
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 3:13:26 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Katy Gerber and I have been a resident of Anaheim all my life. I am writing in deep concern for the
health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of
policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately
affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I demand justice for Daniel Ramirez who was killed last year by Anaheim Policeman Nick Bennallack. This is the
FOURTH police sanctioned murder this officer has committed without punishment or justice for his victims. Fire
this officer and you will remove a danger to our community.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Katy Gerber
From: Qj Sandler
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund Anaheim PD
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 1:37:50 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become
more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take
place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Thank you,
DJ Sandler
From: Alexander York
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Demilitarize the police force
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 12:57:45 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Alexander York, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Alexander York
From: Selena Matranga
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: HELP US REFUND POLICE TODAY RIGHT NOW AND FOREVER
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 11:56:00 AM
My name is Selena Matranga, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in
deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become
more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an
end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have
the largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized
police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community
development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016,
Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and
nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths
caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is
74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend
$700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police
brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I
also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to
improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that
benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members.
We as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to
further terrorize our community.
Selena Matranga
From: Matthew Berman
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 11:21:06 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Matthew Berman, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Matthew Berman
From: Samantha Verza
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 10:58:31 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is [YOUR NAME], and I am a resident of [YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD/CITY]. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our
concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that rnust come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
[YOUR NAME]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR EMAIL]
[YOUR PHONE NUMBER]
Sent from my 1Phone
From: Kion Noori
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Demanding Justice
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 10:35:13 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Kion, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Kion Noori
Anaheim, CA
From: Elise Cruz
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: To whom it may concern
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 10:09:30 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Elise and I am a resident of Fullerton. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Elise Cruz
Fullerton, 92832
Sent from my 1Phone
From: MaWane Do
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: If you care about your citizens, you need to do this!
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 9:37:02 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is MJ, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health
of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our
concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in
Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an
end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
From: Waight Audrey
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: IMPORTANT - DEFUND THE POLICE
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 9:34:19 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Audrey Waight, and I am a resident of Fullerton, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Audrey Waight
Fullerton, CA 92832
From: Pauldean Piere
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 8:19:27 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Pauldean Tamras Piere, and I am a resident of Fountain Valley, CA. I hope you are doing well. I am
writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a
radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in
Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
I hope you have a great day.
Pauldean Tamras Piere
fountain valley, ca 92708
From: Kiana Butler
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Concern for the Community
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 6:46:15 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Kiana Butler, and I am a resident of Anaheim Hills. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Kiana Butler
Anaheim, Ca 92807
From: dafnieee
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: My request for a reallocation of budgets/funds
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2020 3:30:24 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Riza Dafnie and I am a resident all the way from the Philippines and though I'm
miles away, I'm hoping you will still take time to address my concerns and hear me out. I am
writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more
than clear that a radical shift in the concept of policing and community health must take place
at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, the US has the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 201.4, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5" that will use $ 10000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on the elected officials to stop criminalizing the community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Sincerely,
Riza Dafnie Pionilla
From: Natalia Sabin
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; .Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Tremor o"Neil
Subject: Reallocate Police Budgets
Date: Friday, .June 12, 2020 10:57:01 PM
My name is Natalia Sabin, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more
than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health
must tape place at the local lever. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an
end.
The united States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have
the largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized
police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community
development.
.Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016,
Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and
nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths
caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is
74% higher than the average for police in California.
demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend
$700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police
brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. 1
also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to
improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that
benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members.
We as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to
further terrorize our community.
Natalia Sabin Anaheim, CA 92805
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Steil a and I am an ally to the Anaheim community. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that rntwL come to an end.
TheUnited Stales does not have a national healthcarc system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police d"rtmems in the world, Anaheim is no diff4Lnt: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153-8 million to law onfbrerment and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S, From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 401 of them were. unarmed- Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 740/4 higher than the
average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution I T' that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use S 100,000 to improve 10 police
vchicles. Instead, invest that money in creating prograins that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic -
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing out community memben- We as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Stella "Lago" Jones
Theylthcm or SheAer
Couple, Family, individual Therapist
Brave Space, LLC
httpt;://gce02..qafelink.9.protection-outiot)k-comP?
uri=htV/,,3A`/`2F`/`2Fv,-Arn•.bravespacellc. com%2F&data=02%700I %7CPubl iccommejit/AOanaheim.net`/`7Cd I cOcae I 7d8544249fD9O8d8Of3fbaaf/.7C74c3739r5O2a49c68d2 I 2bbc3Of56f22%7C I %7CO'/. 7C63 72 76 1 13 68827 5942&ajiip ;sdata=qj.SLu7UJloyaMmdSdOuN 8A'/.2Fk`/*2BGJ I FyXA5B I X7NnZ2 Ow'/63 D& reserved=O
front desk p
direct line
fax
The confidentiality of electronic communications cannot be guaranteed. This email may contain Protected Health information [PHI], PHI is personal and sensitive information related to a person's health care. It is being sent to you after appropriate authorization from the patient or under circumstances that do not require patient
authorization. You, the recipient, are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. Re -disclosure without additional patient consent or as permitted by law is prohibited- Unauthorized disclosure or failure to maintain confidentiality could subject you to penalties described in federal and state laws. This transmission is
intended only for those to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged. confidential, or protected by taw. All others are hereby notified that receipt of this message does not waive any applicable privilege or exemption from disclosure and that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
prohibited. Ifyou have received this communication in mor, please notify us immediately and shred this documentation.
From: Yuko Christine Shimura
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Efforts to Defund the Police
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 5:54:20 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Yuko Shimura, and I am a resident of Anaheim Hills, Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the
health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of
policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately
affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Yuko Shimura
Anaheim Hills, 92807
From: Maia Kaimakliotis
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: WHERE TO PUT YOUR MONEY AFTER DEFUNDING/DEMILITARIZING YOUR POLICE
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 4:31:43 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Maia Kaimakliotis, and I am a resident of New York City. I am writing in deep concern for the health of
the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
MAIA KAIMAKLIOTIS
NY 10002
From, Jocelyn Garcia
To: Public Comment
oo Stephen Fae:ssel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Boanzmxm; Jose Moreno; Trevor l]Neil; Lucille Kctu
Subject: oecreasepmicepumg/no
zmmm' Friday, June 12' 2020 3:1e51 PM
Dear Mayor Sidhuand Council Members,
yWyname ioJocelyn Garcia, and |amwriting onbehalf ofmyself and the citizens of
Anaheim. | live in Central Anaheim, CA. The deaths of/\hrnaud /\rbery' Breonno Taylor,
and George Floyd have called attention tolongstanding racial tensions inthis country and
police brutality against black people and other POC. As you may know, Mayor Garcetti
recently stated he would cut funding to LAPD by t least $150 million. We C8|| OD the City of
Anaheim to re -allocate a portion of its budget away from police programs and take steps to
eliminate police violence.
Although the recent killings occurred far from Anaheim, Anaheim has its own history of
police violence. Many of us remember the summer of 2012, when two unarmed men,
Manuel Diaz and Joel Acevedo were killed bVOfficers Nick BenD@||8Ckand Kelly Phillips Of
the Anaheim Police Department in two separate incidents. In 2017, the ACLU ranked
Anaheim P[}the 9th deadliest force in the co for its record ofofficer-involved
shootings. And iD2018'Anaheim police officers Sean St@y08t8Sand Kevin Pedersen shot
8tE|iUthPeDQ|Oz8Nava more than 70 times before killin ,@Dincident that you
remarked at the time was "disturbing."
The officers involved in these shootings must face consequences for their actions. In the
case of Manuel Diaz, it took a total of four years and an appeal to the Supreme Court to
rule that Officer Benn8||@ckused excessive force and award the amount Ofdamages tOthe
Diaz family. Even then, Officers Bennallack and Phillips faced no consequences for their
actions and remain active in the Anaheim PD. What does it say when the people we trust to
protect our streets, are responsible for taking innocent lives? To its credit, the City
fired Officer Pedersen and placed Officer St@V0@t8SoAadministrative leave in light Ofthe
2018 incident. But this is not enough. We are not satisfied with retroactive justice. The City
of Anaheim has to act to prevent violence from happening in the first place.
First, wedemand that the City reduce police funding. |nthe FY2O2O/2O21 Proposed
Budget, approximately 42%Ofour budget will be dedicated tDlaw enforcement. Allocating Q
larger portion of these funds to efforts in education, homelessness, affordable housing, and
mental health would greatly improve quality of life and reduce inequality in our
neighborhoods. By focusing on these preventative measures, we will uplift our
communities, see reduced crime, and diminish the need for police intervention.
8eoond, we must restructure law enforcement governance. In pertiou|er, we want to
diminish the role of police unions' which repeatedly stand by officer misconduct and actively
hinder efforts to oversee them. Furthermore, it should be required that if an officer commits
a single act of misconduct they are immediately released from duty pending review of the
incident. Ifthe incident i8substantiated they should b8fired (NOT placed ODdesk duty) and
should not beable tobarehired byanother department.
Finally, we Urge VDU to 8UppOrtthe to minimize police violence. We
call onAnaheim to:
Ban Chokaho[doand Strangleholds
Require De-escalation
Require Exhausting Other Means Before Shooting
Ban Shooting otMoving Vehicles
Implement Use ofForce Continuum
Require Comprehensive Reporting
Mayor Sidhu and Council Members, let us not be on the wrong side of history and instead
make Anaheim a model for other cities to follow. We demand that you address these
concerns in this month's city council meetings, and work to ensure the safety of all our
Beet'
From: Erin Alexandra
To: Public Comment
Subject: No on Resolution 5, 19 & 30
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 3:16:27 PM
My name is Erin White and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the
health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in
our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Francisco PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in
California, according to a 2017 study by the ACLU.
WE DEMAND that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that
any future projects related to surveillance be halted. We also DEMAND that the council not
approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. We DEMAND
that the city council not approve "Resolution 30" proclaiming the continuing existence of a
local emergency regarding civil unrest, which will continue to criminalize peaceful
protestors. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
We are calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Erin White
From: Joshua Kaduthodil
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Regarding Defunding the Police
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 1:54:52 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Joshua Kaduthodil, and I am a resident of New Jersey concerned about Anaheim. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our
concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that rnust come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Joshua Kaduthodil
From: Danielle B
To: Public Comment
Subject: No on Resolution 5,19 & 30]
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 12:55:28 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Danielle Brown and I am a resident of Anaheim, CA. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that
a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local
level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents
and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Francisco PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in
California, according to a 2017 study by the ACLU.
WE DEMAND that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that
any future projects related to surveillance be halted. We also DEMAND that the council not
approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. We DEMAND
that the city council not approve "Resolution 30" proclaiming the continuing existence of a
local emergency regarding civil unrest, which will continue to criminalize ceful
protestors. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
We are calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Danielle Brown
From: Mary Pham
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the police
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 12:45:31 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Mary-linh Phan and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Mary-linh Pham
From: Kaitlin Doolittle
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: DEFUND Anaheim PD NOW!
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 2:29:57 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Kaitlin, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Kaitlin D.
From: Nick DAndrea
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Concerns regarding public safety
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:33:47 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Nick, and I am a resident of District 6 of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end. The United States does not have a national healthcare
system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police
departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development. Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in
the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40%
of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD,
NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money
on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be
halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police
vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a
global pandemic. I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Nick D'Andrea
Anaheim, CA 92808
From: Kristen Bedard
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:28:23 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Kristen Bedard and I am a resident of Huntington Beach, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the
health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of
policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately
affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Kristen Bedard
HB, CA 92646
From: Alejandro Navarro
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Policing Concerns
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:13:47 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Alejandro Navarro, and I am a resident of Garden Grove, Ca. I am writing in
deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear
that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the
local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown
residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Alejandro Navarro
garden grove Ca
From: Tina Chavez
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: Balance the budget
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:02:43 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Tina Chavez, and I am a resident of the part of Orange the neighbours Anaheim. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our
concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve the Resolution that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Tina Chavez
92865
From: Ashley B
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:08:05 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Ashley Barbee, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Ashley Barbee
Anaheim 92805
From: Jamie Reeves
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Police Concerns
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 9:14:44 PM
Hello Anaheim City Council,
I am calling for the defending of the police.
Defunding the Police > Police Reform
The way to reduce police violence is to reduce the scope, size, and role of police
in our communities.
Why would we continue to throw money away at something we already know is not working?
We need those resources in schools, toward our health, and for our futures.
Signed,
Jamie Reeves
From: Layla Jahanshahi
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: DIVEST ANAHEIM PD INVEST IN YOUR COMMUNITY
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 9:12:27 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Layla Jahanshahi, and I am a resident of Huntington Beach, orange county. I am
writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more
than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place
at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Layla Jahanshahi
HB, CA, 92646
con]
From: Ibrahim Bharoocha
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Healthcare and Police violence
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:58:20 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Ibrahim , and I am a resident of Santa Clara 95051 Crosby ct. I am writing in deep concern for the
health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of
policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately
affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Ibrahim
95051 ca
From: Erin Averill
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Is this thing on? Stop spying on people!
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:56:42 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Erin Averill, and I am a resident of Aliso Viejo. I am writing in deep concern for
the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical
shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Erin Averill
From: Ammy Jurado
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: DEFUND THE POLICE
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:39:05 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Ammy, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Ammy
Sent from mylPhone
From: Adelaide Denton
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: It needs to stop
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:30:15 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Adelaide, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
- Adelaide
From:
Kristina Phan
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
No on 19, 5, and 30
Date:
Thursday, June 11, 2020 7:05:53 PM
Dear Anaheim city council,
My name is Kristina Phan and I am an Anaheim, CA resident. I'm concern with the
status of the communities in Anaheim, given the radical shift in our concept of policing
and community health must take place at the local level. Police brutality must end.
Police violence that disproportionately affects Black and Brown residents must end.
With the largest militarized police departments in the world, the political figures in the
United states ACTIVE choose to spend more money on policing citizens instead of
educating, supporting, and healing them. Anaheim is no different; with $153.8 million
was given to law enforcement when only $1 million is given to community
development. Why is that?
Even with the large amount given to law enforcement, Anaheim is the ninth most
violent police department in the Us from 2003-2016. Out of the 33 people killed by
the Anaheim Police Department, 40% of them were unarmed. According to the ACLU,
the rate of arrest -related deaths in Anaheim exceeds that of NYPD and LAPD since
2017. Therefore, the city council CANNOT approve Resolution 19 that plans to spend
more on surveillance and policing. The council CANNOT approve Resolution 5 that
will use more money for police vehicles. We CANNOT approve Resolution 30 that
continues to criminalize peaceful protestors, which impeeds on our first amendment
rights to peacefully assemble. These funds can be reallocated to community services
and programs, we need more than just $1 million to improve the health status of our
community.
Thank you for your time and consideration,
Kristina -Phan
From: Paul Schmidt
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Trevor o"Neil
Subject: Request to Defund the Police Department and Invest in the Livelihood of Communities of Color
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 6:21:13 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Paul Schmidt, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and
some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-
2020 budget allocated $163.3 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -
related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than
the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money
on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be
halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police
vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during
a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Best,
Paul Schmidt
From: James Davidson
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Trevor o"Neil
Subject: Plea to Redirect Police Department Money to Education and Social Services
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2520 5:11:49 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jim Davidson, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and
some of the most ►well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-
2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -
related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than
the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money
on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be
halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police
vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during
a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Best,
Jim Davidson
From: Kirsten
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: A Citizen"s Voice - Please Listen
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 5:21:20 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Kirsten Mattingly, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than
clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take
place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the
largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police
departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated
$153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016,
Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly
40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by
Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than
the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests
and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the
council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police
vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We
as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further
terrorize our community.
Kirsten Mattingly
Anaheim, CA 92804
From: Nathan Barone
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Please Defund the Police and Invest In Communities of Color
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 5:13:21 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Nathan Barone, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Best,
Nathan Barone
From: Christopher Espidio
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the police
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:58:27 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Christopher Espidio, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Christopher Espidio
Sent from my'lPhone
From: christol2her espidio
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the policd
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:55:26 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Christopher Espidio, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Christopher Espidio
Sent from my lPhone
From: Sally Lucchesi
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Tremor o"Neil
Subject: Anaheim Needs to Change!
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:45:48 PM
To the Anaheim city Council:
My name is sally Lucchesi, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than
clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take
place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the
largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police
departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated
$153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010,
Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly
40% of them were unarmed. since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by
Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than
the average for police in California.
demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests
and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the
council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police
vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. we
as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further
terrorize our community.
Sally Lucchesi
Theresa Bass
From: Emily Santos
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 521 PM
To: City Attorney; City Clerk; City Manager; Denise Barnes; -Finance Administration; Harry
Sidhu (Mayor); Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Stephen Faessel; Trevor
O'Neil
Subject: DEMAND RESTRUCTURING
Hello,
My name is Emily Santos. I am a resident of Anaheim, CA and I am emailing to demand the
restructuring of our city budget, so as to prioritize more social services for our community, and to
drastically minimize spending on Police. It is unconscionable that 1/3 to 1/2 of the city's budget is
going to the police department.
This does not align with the values that I have as your constituent and I demand that you and other
city officials work together to draft and approve a budget that diverts funds from the police
department and reallocates them directly to benefit those in need.
Defending the police and restructuring the budget is an absolute necessity now more than ever.
Police perpetuate a pattern of excessive violence and force, especially directed towards Black
People and their communities. The police refuse to hold their own accountable and this is
unacceptable.
We are in the middle of a global pandemic that has killed 100,000 Americans and more than 40
million people have filed for unemployment. Healthcare workers are without proper equipment and
essential workers are not being fairly compensated or protected for the great work they do. We
don't need more police, we need more social safety nets. Funds intended for police would be better
off being sorted to initiatives that
Enrich our public schools and students
Provide more affordable housing and mental health care initiatives
Protect and bolster our parks
Support small businesses struggling due to COVID- 19
Provide cheaper and cleaner modes of public transportation
Our nation is grieving the deaths of Black Americans that were murdered at the hands of police
officers who have yet to be held accountable. While the police department has more funding than it
knows what to do with, we have communities who desperately need funding and every day they
don't receive it their quality of life worsens. Thousands have died who did not need to. You have
the ability to change this, so do it.
Email ID:
�)incereiy,
Emily Santos
From: Madeline Knopf
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Funding Concerns
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:36:36 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Madeline, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Madeline Knopf
Anaheim, CA
From: Milly Chi
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: LESSEN THE POLICE BUDGET PLEASE
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 2:54:03 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Milly Chi, and I am a resident of Buena Park, CA, bordering on the city of
Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It
has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately
affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Milly Chi
Milly Chi
Pronouns: she/her/hers
Pitzer College '22 1 B.A. Asian American Studies & Organizational Studies
From: lade
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Human Rights Over Dead Bodies
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 2:04:27 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jade Stonerock, and I am a resident of Mission Viejo. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that
a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local
level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents
and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Thank you for your time,
Jade Stonerock
From: Emmalee Horn
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the police
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 1:56:27 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Emmalee, and I am a resident of Southern california. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Emmalee Horn
Theresa Bass
From: Arsal Bokhari
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 5:20 PM
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring;
Stephen Faessel; Trevor O'Neil; City Attorney; City Manager; City Clerk; _Finance
Administration
Subject: Proper Representation Needed!!!
Hello,
My name is Arsal Bokhari. I am a resident of Anaheim, CA and I am emailing to demand the restructuring of our city
budget, so as to prioritize more social services for our community, and to drastically minimize spending on Police. It is
unconscionable that 113 to 1/2 of the city's budget is going to the police department.
This does not align with the values that I have as your constituent and I demand that you and other city officials work
together to draft and approve a budget that diverts funds from the police department and reallocates them directly to
benefit those in need.
Defunding the police and restructuring the budget is an absolute necessity now more than ever. Police perpetuate a
pattern of excessive violence and force, especially directed towards Black People and their communities. The police
refuse to hold their own accountable and this is unacceptable.
We are in the middle of a global pandemic that has killed 100,000 Americans and more than 40 million people have filed
for unemployment. Healthcare workers are without proper equipment and essential workers are not being fairly
compensated or protected for the great work they do. We don't need more police, we need more social safety nets.
Funds intended for police would be better off being sorted to initiatives that
Enrich our public schools and students
Provide more affordable housing and mental health care initiatives Protect and bolster our parks Support small
businesses struggling due to CO'VID-19 Provide cheaper and cleaner modes of public transportation
Our nation is grieving the deaths of Black Americans that were murdered at the hands of police officers who have yet to
be held accountable. While the police department has more funding than it knows what to do with, we have
communities who desperately need funding and every day they don't receive it their quality of life worsens. Thousands
have died who did not need to. You have the ability to change this, so do it.
Email ID
Sincerely,
Arsal Bokhari
From: farmental
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Community Concern
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 12:09:44 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:<br >
<br >
My name is Cheri Anuenta, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for
the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical
shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Cheri Armenta
Anaheim
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S 10+, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone
From: Andre Luu
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the police and save a life
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 12:00:00 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Andre Luu , and I am a resident of Garden Grove. I am writing in deep concern
for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical
shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Andre Nguyen Luu
Garden Grove 92841 CA
From: Litzi Guerrero
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Concerned Resident
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:45:47 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Litzi Guerrero, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Litzi Guerrero
Theresa Bass
From: sam crane >
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 8:26 PM
To: Public Comment; City Clerk
Subject: Defund the Police and Reallocate Funds
Anaheim,
I am urging you to take long-lasting action in response to the police brutality and systemic racism
that has defined our country's culture. We know better, let's do better. I'm calling on you to
defend the police and re -allocate those funds to community services that will serve communities of
color and all communities as well as prevent crime. This funding will also help allow communities
develop new models of non- c arc eral/non -punitive justice (restorative justice). Once the police have
been defended, I call on you to implement checks (psych evaluations, determiners of subconscious
racism, requiring de-escalation, ban on chokeholds, etc) on our public safety people to ensure they
behave in a way that keeps everyone safe.
Best,
Sam Crane
ps- To be clear the Anaheim PD doesn't need more money for security surveillance or stingrays.
From: Anne Nguyen
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:14:21 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Anne Nguyen, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Anne Nguyen
Sent from my lPhone
From: Damaris Santana
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu(Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor o"Neil
Subject: Stand Up for the Community
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:08:59 AM
Dear Anaheim city council:
My name is Damaris, and I'm originally from Walnut, CA but now reside in NYC. I am
writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has
become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
In 2007, I was a student at Cal State Fullerton and witnessed the unspeakable acts of
hate on our campus. Nooses were hung in our campus auad4 the day after we had a large
number of high school "inner-city" students for a 'Day in College,' event. This was
traumatic to experience, but deeply hurtful knowing nothing was done to remedy that
despicable act of hatred, especially when Fullerton/OC is known for its KKK chapters
and racism. Think about haw that reflects on the area rou pledge to serve.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the
largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police
departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated
$153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
How does one rationalize this disparity?
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010,
Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly
40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by
Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than
the average for police in California.
demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests
and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the
council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police
vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We
as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further
terrorize our community.
This is your chance to be a leader and a voice for change.
DAMARIS SANTANA
From, Samuel Juliano
To: Public Comment
oo Stephen Fae:ssel; Denise Barnes,; Jordan Boanzmxm; Jose Moreno; Lucille KrLa/ZuevogZNeil
Subject: oecreasepmicepumg/no
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:04:34 AM
Dear Mayor Sidhuand Council Members,
yWVname iSSam Juliano, and |@Olwriting On behalf Ofmyself and the citizens OfAnaheim.
I live iD[TustiU`CA].The deaths of Ahm8Ud Arbery.BreoDD8Taylor, and George Floyd
have called attention to longstanding racial tensions in this country and police brutality
against black people and other POC. As you may know, Mayor Garcetti recently stated he
would cut funding to LAPD by at least $150 million. We call on the City of Anaheim to re-
allocate a portion of its budget away from police programs and take steps toeliminate
police violence.
Although the recent killings occurred far from Anaheim, Anaheim has its own history of
police violence. Many of us remember the summer of 2012, when two unarmed men,
Manuel Diaz and Joel Acevedo were killed bmOfficers Nick Benn@U@Ckand Kelly Phillips Of
the Anaheim Police Department in two separate incidents. In 2017, the ACLU ranked
Anaheim P[) the 9th deadliest force in the co for its record ofoffioepinvo|ved
shootings. And in2018,Anaheim police officers Sean St@yDl8teSand Kevin Pedersen shot
@tBiUthPeD@|OZ@Nava more than 70 times before killin '8Dincident that you
remarked at the time was "disturbing."
The officers involved in these shootings must face consequences for their actions. In the
case of Manuel Diaz, it took a total of four years and an appeal to the Supreme Court to
rule that Officer Bennallack used excessive force and award the amount of damages to the
Diaz family. Even then, Officers Bennallack and Phillips faced no consequences for their
actions and remain active in the Anaheim PD. What does it say when the people we trust to
protect our streets, are responsible for taking innocent lives? To its credit, the City fired
Officer Pedersen and placed Officer St@y08te8ODadministrative leave iDlight Dfthe 2018
incident. But this is not enough. We are not satisfied with retroactive justice. The City of
Anaheim has toact toprevent violence from happening inthe first place.
First, wedemand that the City reduce police funding. |nthe FY 2020/2021 Proposed
Budget, approximately 42%Ofour budget will be dedicated tDlaw enforcement. Allocating @
larger portion of these funds to efforts in education, homelessness, affordable housing, and
mental health would greatly improve quality oflife and reduce inequality in our
neighborhoods. By focusing on these preventative measures, we will uplift our
communities, see reduced crime, and diminish the need for police intervenition.
Second, we must restructure law enforcement governance. In particular, we want to
diminish the rode of police unions, which repeatedly stand by officer misconduct and actively
hinder efforts to oversee them. Furthermore, it should be required that if an officer commits
a single act of misconduct they are immediately released from duty pending review of the
incident. If the incident is substantiated they should be fired (JOT placed on desk duty) and
should not be able to be rehired by another department.
Finally, we urge you to support the 8 Can't Wait Initiative to minimize police violence. We
call on Anaheim to;
i
•
•
Ban Chokeholds and Strangleholds
Require De-escalation
Require Exhausting other Means Before Shooting
Ban shooting at Moving Vehicles
Implement Use of Force continuum
Require comprehensive Reporting
Mayor Sidhu and council Members, let us not be on the wrong side of history and instead
make Anaheim a model for other cities to follow. We demand that you address these
concerns in this month's city council meetings, and work to ensure the safety of all our
citizens.
Best,
[Sam Juliano]
From: Supriya Patel
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund Anaheim PD
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:48:25 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Supriya, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Black Lives Matter,
Supriya Patel
From: Amanda Mohammed
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Banning the Use of Rubber Bullets
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:40:59 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Amanda Mohammed, and I am a resident of Santa Barbara California, which is a couple of hours away
from Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more
than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level.
Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an
end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global.
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Amanda Mohammed
Santa Barbara,
Sent from my iPhone
From: Anthony Rizo
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund APD!
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:08:22 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jose Rizo, and I am a resident of East Anaheim in District 5. 1 am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that
a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local
level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents
and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars
of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any
future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve
"Resolution 5 that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that
money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Jose Rizo
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
From: Albanie NierenberQ
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: I urge you to DEFUND THE POLICE.
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 9:49:02 AM
Dear City Leadership,
My name is Albanie, and I am a concerned citizen. This past week, our nation and community have been gripped
by protests calling for an end to racism and anti -Blackness and a complete overhaul in our approach to criminal
justice in America. I am demanding that our voices be heard, and that real change be made to the way this city
allocates its resources..
The fact that the police force encompasses over 895 million dollars of the county's general fund is shameful and
unproductive. Research shows that a living wage, access to holistic health services and treatment, educational
opportunity, and stable housing are far more successful at reducing crime than police or prisons (Source: Popular
Democracy).
There is not just a need for police reform, but police defunding and abolition, because the entire structure of the
police force is inherently corrupt and ineffective. The average police recruit spends 58 hours learning how to shoot
and only 8 hours learning how to de-escalate (Source: Campaign Zero). They are not trained or equipped to react
to the vast majority of crises. Phillip McHarris (doctoral candidate focusing on race), argues that we must work
towards a reality in which healthcare workers and emergency response teams handle substance abuse, domestic
violence, homelessness, or mental health cases. Policies to "improve the police" are not enough, as there's no
evidence that implicit bias training or community relations initiatives help with reducing the abuses of policing (The
Nation). We need to reimagine public safety to prioritize alternatives to conflict rather than defaulting to violence.
I demand the immediate freezing of budget increases to the police force, cancelling of cadet classes,
demilitarization of our forces, and reallocation of funds from police to community -led health and safety
strategies.
Please do not vote to increase police funding. Do not be complicit in the disproportionate targeting of people of
color. Propose and vote to expand on its current efforts in healthcare, affordable housing, and restorative justice.
We demand a budget that supports community wellbeing, rather than empowers the police forces that tear them
apart.
It is your duty to represent your constituents. I am urging you to revise the Santa Clara County budget for the next
fiscal year, and to fund the police. We can be a beacon for other cities to follow if only we have the courage to
change.
Thank you for your time,
Albanie Nierenberg
From: Pauldean Piere
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: Defund the Police
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 9:14:25 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Pauldean Tamras Piere, and I am a resident of Fountain Valley. I am writing in deep concern, for the
health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of
policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately
affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you for your time,
Pauldean Tamras Piere
From: Jericho Fulgencio
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Tremor o"Neil
Subject: Divest and Reinvest Police Funds for 2020/2021 budget
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 7:10:22 AM
To the Anaheim city council:
My name is Jericho Fulgencio, and I am a resident of Anaheim, California. I am
writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has
become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the
largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police
departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated
$153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010,
Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly
40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by
Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than
the average for police in California.
demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests
and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the
council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police
vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We
as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further
terrorize our community.
Jericho Fulgencio
From: Kazka Reitz McCrU
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor 0"Neil
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2020 7:07:20 AM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Kazimiera Mccray, and I am a resident of [YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD/CITY]. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our
concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that rnust come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Kazimiera Mccray
From: Nancy Mendez
To: Public Comment
Subject: No on Resolution 5, 19 & 30
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 10:21:48 PM
Dear Anaheim City Council:
My name is Nancy and I am a resident of the City of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern
for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical
shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead., we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Francisco PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in
California, according to a 2017 study by the ACLU.
WE DEMAND that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that
any future projects related to surveillance be halted. We also DEMAND that the council not
approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. We DEMAND
that the city council not approve "Resolution 30" proclaiming the continuing existence of a
to-cal-emh will
srgency regarding riyil unrest, �Yhic continue to criminatiz-Q-nea-c-dul
protestors. Instead invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
We are calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Nancy Mendez
From: William Nguyen
To: Public Comment
Subject: Anaheim Council - Public Comment No on Resolution 5,19 & 30
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 9:26:20 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
[SUBJECT:No on Resolution 5,19 & 30]
My name is William Nguyen and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for
the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical
shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must
come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Francisco PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in
California, according to a 2017 study by the ACLU.
WE DEMAND that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that
any future projects related to surveillance be halted. We also DEMAND that the council not
approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. We DEMAND
that the city council not approve "Resolution 30" proclaiming the continuing existence of a
local emergency regarding civil unrest, whichwillcontinue to criminaliz ceful
protestors. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
M Redirecting
We are calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
William Nguyen
UCLA c/o 2016 1 Psychobiology & International Development Studies I Evolutionary Medicine
From: Kelly Rivard
To: Public Comment
Subject: Allocation of Funding
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 9:05:46 PM
Hello,
From my understanding, Anaheim is planning on reducing the budget of community development by 20% and
increasing the amount spent on the police, specifically security surveillance. I urge you to reconsider, as spending on
community development is crucial to improving the lives of Anaheim citizens. Decreasing this spending would
hinder the education, jobs, and quality of life of many. Further, I urge you to allocate some of the present funding
that is for the police to community development. The fact that the budget for developing Anaheim's community is
less than one percent of the budget for Anaheim's police is worrisome and seems rather disproportionate.
Sincerely,
Kelly Rivard
Sent from my Whone
From: sam crane
To: Public Comment; Ci ly Clerk
Subject: Defund the Police and Reallocate Funds
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 8:26:36 PM
Anaheim,
I am urging you to take long-lasting action in response to the police brutality and
systemic racism that has defined our country's culture. We know better, let's do
better. I'm calling on you to defund the police and re -allocate those funds to
community services that will serve communities of color and all communities as
well as prevent crime. This funding will also help allow communities develop new
models of non- c arc eral/non-punitive justice (restorative justice). Once the police
have been defunded, I call on you to implement checks (psych evaluations,
determiners of subconscious racism, requiring de-escalation, ban on chokeholds,
etc) on our public safety people to ensure they behave in a way that keeps everyone
safe.
Best,
Sam Crane
ps- To be clear the Anaheim PD doesn't need more money for security surveillance
or stingrays.
From: Edgar Arellano
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stel2hen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Kring; Trevor O"Neil
Subject: No confidence in Anaheim City Council
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 6:42:43 PM
Hello Councilmembers,
I am disappointed and embarrassed at your actions last night. After fake performances of
solidarity with protestors, you all still refused to take action to begin the defunding of
Anaheim Police Department. Even worse, your body approved to further risk our privacy for
an exorbitant fee, further equipped the bloated police department with unnecessary tools, and
ultimately wasted this moment to hold the department accountable as requested by our
community.
It is frustrating that Resolution 5 was approved. $ 100,000 is a huge fee to improve 10 vehicles,
was an RFP issued? Where is the transparency in the budgeting process? The fact that these
cars were sitting in storage provided more public safety than their inevitable use on the streets.
Today June 10 1 witnessed, as usual, a PD squad car speeding down Katella Ave. between
Euclid & Clementine. I recorded dashcam evidence of several instances in which speeds of
—50+ were erratically driven by an officer in Squad Car "313" - on roof, 26313 - on bumper,
1541556 - plates. They constantly sped up past the speed limit only to slam on brakes at every
red since the corridor is designated for 35 mph speeds. There is no point in acquiring
equipment that is used dangerously and reckless enough to increase wear & tear leading to
increased maintenance costs.
This is not the only instance in which PD sets dangerous driving conditions by speeding ahead
of traffic, which other drivers take as a cue to travel at high speed. In the wake of previous
protests, I recall officers speeding through bedroom communities without cause. For these
reasons, among others related to bloated budgets for increased militarization, i am deeply
concerned with your lack of judgment in approving this wasteful resolution.
Additionally, I fear that our community privacy steps closer & closer to unwarranted searches.
I demand that you rescind your votes in favor of resolution 19. This equipment is a direct
threat to our 4th amendment & 5th amendment rights. The ACLU continues to condemn the
abuse of for-profit contracts to overrule citizens privacy rights as afforded by the 4th and 5th
amendment. There is no accountability nor transparency in the APD's use of this technology
equipment, and they actively refuse inquiries due to non -disclosure agreements. The answers
provided during the council meeting were not satisfactory in the slightest, the doubt was loud
in the ways which staff, the city manager, & police chief avoided the privacy violation
questions. If PD is reckless with their squad cars, then I have no confidence in their ability to
have good judgement in using the "stingray" surveillance technology.
Talk is cheap. Grow a spine and support your constituents against the tyranny of our police
state & police union. Defund the police, or at the very least restrict the police union influence
on your vote. I have no confidence in the current city council body, the mayor, and the actions
to uphold white supremacy to further suppress our community.
Do better,
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner, District 2
From:
Samuel Sanchez
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Defund Anaheim Pd
Date:
Wednesday, June 10, 2020 6:03:49 PM
Why is Anaheim only putting 1 million back into the community
From:
Martin Perez
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
No on resolution 5, 19, and 30H
Date:
Wednesday, June 10, 2020 3:48:04 PM
My name is Martin perez. and I am a resident of Anaheim, California. I am writing in deep
concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that
a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local
level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents
and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest
military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the
world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law
enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim
Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were
unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of
LAPD, NYPD, and San Francisco PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in
California, according to a 2017 study by the ACLU.
WE DEMAND that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000
dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that
any future projects related to surveillance be halted. We also DEMAND that the council not
approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. We DEMAND
that the city council not approve "Resolution 30" proclaiming the continuing existence of a
local emergency regarding civil unrest, which will continue to criminalize peaceful
protestors. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
We are calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a
concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our
community.
Martin Perez
Public Comment
From: Kristine Biscocho
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 3:51 PM
To: Public Comment; Stephen Faessel; Jordan Brandman; Lucille Kring; Denise Barnes;
Trevor O'Neil; Jose Moreno; Harry Sidhu (Mayor)
Subject: Please invest money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community
instead of further funding the police
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Kristine Biscocho, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of
the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing
and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately
affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and
some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the
2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department
killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of
arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher
than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 1.9" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer
money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to
surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to
improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned
community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Kristine Biscocho
Anaheim Hills, CA 92805
Public Comment
From: borvorithy Uong
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 11:56 PM
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name its Borvorithy Uong and I am a resident of Burbank, CA. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black
and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of
the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed 33
people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I
also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead,
invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community refuse
to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Borvorithy Uong
Public Comment
From: Alec Manning
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2020 1:30 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: [*** INSERT UNIQUE SUBJECT LINE ***]
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Alec Manning, and I am a resident of Yorba Linda. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health
must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents
and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of
the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010, Anaheim Police Department killed 33
people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. l
also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead,
invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community refuse
to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
[YOUR NAME]
[YOUR ADDRESS]
[YOUR EMAIL]
[YOUR PHONE NUMBER]
Sent from my iPhone
Public Comment
From: Pauldean Piere
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:39 AM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: A Simple Request
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Pauldean Tamras Piere, and I am a resident of Fountain Valley, CA. I hope that you are well. I am writing in
deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our
concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has
disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of
the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010, Anaheim Police Department killed 33
people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. l
also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead,
invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. we as a concerned community refuse
to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Pauldean Tamras Piere
fountain valley, ca 9270E
Public Comment
From: Alyssa
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 2;49 AM
To: Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil; Stephen Faessel; Jose Moreno; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Public Comment
Subject: COMMUNITY OUTREACH
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Alyssa Santana and I am a resident of Garden Grove. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the
greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and
community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black
and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of
the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010, Anaheim Police Department killed 33
people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. l
also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead,
invest that money in cheating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. we as a concerned community refuse
to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Alyssa Santana
Sent from my iPhone
Public Comment
From:
Jamie Reeves
Sent:
Monday, June 22,2O2O12-46AM
To;
Jamie. J^
Subject:
Defund Anaheim PID
Hello,
|amwriting today because | believe itisofupmos importance that vvedefundthe police. VVeshould adopt asafer and
more comprehensive interpretation of public safety. I ask for this because I would like to see a permanent and total end
to police violence, and the mere presence of police is in itself, violence.
Signed,
Public Comment
From:
Jamie Reeves
Sent:
Saturday, June ZO\ZOZO8�ZPM
To;
Jamie.��
Subject:
Defund
It is necesary to defund police in order to create a safer community for all Americans. I know it may be scary to
dismantle apolice department inyour little frame ofreality, but itisscarier that police regularly terrorize and murder
citizens.
Public Comment
From: Emmett Brock
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 2-50 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Hold Anaheim Accountable
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Emmett Brock and I am a resident of Orange County. I am writing in deep concern for the
health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our
concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in
Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military
budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is
no different: the 2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to
community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police
Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed.
Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD,
and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of
taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future
projects related to surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5"
that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs
that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned
community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Emmett Brock
Public Comment
From:
JenniferGahbav
Sent:
Monday, June 22,2O2OS-58AM
To;
Public Comment
Subject:
Justice
It's not okay to cut 20% of the Community service budget . The APID is not Beneficial for the people . Community's need
effective support . Community services make a huge difference in education and bring out positives from low income
people to better themselves . Negative reinforcements will make matters worse . The economy is going downhill ,
peoples mental health is at risk. There's injustice left and right . Low income community's have hit rock bottom due to
the economy recession . The people need effective services that actually make a positive difference .
Sent from myiPhone
Public Comment
From: Erdice
Sent: Monday, June 22,2O2O12�43PM
To; Public Comment
Subject: City Council Meeting 6/23
ltisextremely important that police funding NOT becut. Crime happens. Wecurrently donot have enough police to
cover the city properly; with lower tax dollars coming in because of closures mandated by the coronavirus, | know that
vvecannot add positions. It will become more difficult for our law enforcement officers to arrest people because of
attitudes as criminals see what they can get away with (civil disobedience by protesters). | respect and appreciate our
police department. They need your SUPPORT. Incidentally, |donot know any police officer personally All lives matter.
We may look different on the outside, but we are the same inside. Everyone wishes to be treated with respect. Safety is
paramount for all.
PatPeb|ey, Anaheimn,California 92OO1
Sent from myiPhone
Public Comment
From: Alicia Gis
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12-.04 PM
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring;
Stephen Faessel; Trevor O'Neil; City Attorney; City Manager; City Clerk; _Finance
Administration; Public Comment
Subject: Anaheim Budget Priorities
Hello Mayor Sidhu & City Council Members,
My name is Alicia Gibbs and I am an Anaheim resident. Anaheim residents understand that there will be budget
shortfalls due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but we urge you not to cut a penny from our community services. As you are
planning the 2020/2021 budget we urge you to focus any cuts to the budget on the Anaheim Police Department (APD).
The past APD budgets have taken around 42% of Anaheim's general fund that was too much in the past and it is surely
too much going forward. our 2020/2021 budget needs to be restructured to prioritize and increase funding for
programs that assist with homelessness, education, and health.
We need to use our budget to uplift our communities, not criminalize them. According to a 2017 ACLU report on the
Anaheim PD in 2009 and in 2010 36% of all homicides were at the hands of Anaheim officers. Many of the people who
have been killed by APD were unarmed, some even shot in the back as they were running for their lives. How is this a
wise use of our budget? I realize APD has made progress, according to the recently implemented Police Review Board
Annual Report they only killed one person in 2019, (let's get to 0). But, some of the same officers called out in the ACLU
report are still working for APD and our Anaheim budget is paying their salaries. officer Mick Bennallack is still with the
APD after being named in the ACLU report as an officer involved with multiple fatal shootings. Most recently, since the
report, in April 2019, this officer killed a suspect who appeared to be surrendering in body camera footage. How is
Bennallack still working as an officer, and again, I ask, how is this a wise use of our budget?
Thank you,
Alicia Gibbs
Public Comment
From: Tev|orPreU
Sent: Monday, June 22,2O2O139PM
To; Public Comment
Subject: Budget Considerations
I understand the City's budget will have to be adjusted in response to the significant impact of the economic shutdown
resulting from the coronavirus pandemic. | urge you not layoff City employees asthey are the backbone ofthe City's
ability to continue providing public service to Anaheim citizens and visitors. Please focus your efforts on reducing costs
in other areas and preserve the positions of your dedicated and loyal City staff.
Thank you,
Toy.o-Pms||
Business Information Systems Analyst U|
/._If Anaheim Police Department
0: (714) 765-1828
425 S. Harbor Blvd.
NAHEIM Anaheim, CA 92805
Public Comment
From: Lucia X
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1-54 PM
Subject: Defund the police!
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Lucia. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more
than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police
violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of
the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.5 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed 33
people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I
also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles. Instead,
invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. we as a concerned community refuse
to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Lucia
Public Comment
From: Mases Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 735 AM
To: Public Comment; Theresa Bass; Gregory Garcia; Linda Andal; Gretchen R. Beatty
Subject: Items 1, 20, and 30 on Council agenda June 23, 2020
Dear City Clerk,
Please distribute to the City Council and confirm that you received this email.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
Due to the unprecedented, multifaceted COVID-19 response, including the shutdown of
our local economy, the City is facing a revenue shortfall over the next year.
The City reports they are considering LAYING OFF City staff and/or reducing public
services, and may take both actions. Public works services will be adversely affected and
there will be more cuts to many other municipal services.
The crippling impact to the City's budget will impact residents, businesses and City
workers. The same City workers who have been on the front lines throughout this crisis
working tirelessly to protect and serve our City's residents will be facing layoffs, and the
community will be hit by cuts to essential services.
Job cuts will not only hurt essential City workers and their families but will adversely affect
their lives as well. The City will cut planners, public works engineers, prosecutors and
other essential local government workers and the core services they deliver. This means
delayed repairs to streets and sidewalks, and limited hours for parks and senior centers,
just to name a few of the core services under threat.
The stakes are too high.
The City should support critical local services and the City workers that provide them.
Council policymakers face a formidable task building the City's budget for the coming
year. While I know there will be tough decisions about how to allocate funds to best
position the City's recovery, one thing is clear: City workers are essential, both to our
safety and to our recovery.
City workers are the engine of our City, and the recovery from the COVID-1 9 crisis starts
with them.
The road to recovery will be long and hard but it will be even longer if we let our City
workers go instead of harnessing their vital economic and social strengths. Providing
funding for City workers is not optional — it is a necessity if we want a vibrant City services
and strong economy.
Please do not layoff City employees. Find another way to balance the budget.
We will work with you to find creative new ways to balance the budget.
Moses Johnson, Acting President AFSCME/MAC
0a
Public Comment
From: Kayla Saunders
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:18 AM
To: Public Comment
Hello City Council,
I'm Kayla Saunders. I would like to submit commentary in support of approving and/or increasing the budget
for policies that would better our communities, specifically Black people and people of color.
Item 101 the Prison to Employment Initiative Agreement, approves grant funds with a maximum of $900,000
for two years. Seeing as the total police budget for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 was over $170 million, Anaheim's
City Council can and should divest more funds into rehabilitating and hiring former prisoners. Please consider
raising this maximum and continuing to support this initiative.
As an avid protestor and supporter of the Black Lives Matter initiative, I am eager to hear more about
Anaheim's new policing policies, and your statements on Black Lives Matter and peaceful protesting.
Thank you for your consideration.
Kind regards,
Kayla Saunders
Public Comment
From:
Marlene Alcantar
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:50 AM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Budget
Council,
I am an Anaheim resident, have been for almost all of my life, and I am extremely concerned at the decisions
that have been made in regards to the budget and community funds in this city. Rather than reappropriating
money from other, over -inflated, and unnecessary budgets (e.g. the police budget) you instead chose to cut
funds to essential community programs, potentially ending youth support systems and laying off YOUR part-
time workers during a PANDEMIC (who are already taken advantage of and treated poorly with stagnant
wages, no benefits, and non-union labor practices).
You prioritize policing our communities rather than providing the services necessary for them to thrive and
prosper. Our youth in particular need these services; many of them come from working-class families and do
not have access to any other programs other than those we provide. I think that this council needs to seriously
get their priorities straight.
And I am not going to even get started on how you prioritize Disney and other tourist businesses over your own
community.
Sincerely,
A concerned, irritated, and fed up Anaheim resident
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:56 AM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Comments for 2PM Closed Session today 6-23-2020
Hello Councilmembers and Labor Negotiators,
Please place a moratorium on any decisionmaking that would increase expenditures for our city budget. There
has yet to be an accepted proposed budget to mitigate COVID 19 impacts to revenues. This is not the time to
make decisions that will create undue burden to the budgeting process, particularly as it pertains to clarity in
providing adequate funds to support our community to endure through these turbulent times.
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner
District 2
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:55 AM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Comments for 3PM Workshop - Proposed Fiscal Year 2020/21
Hello Councilmembers,
Please continue conversations to reallocate monies from the Police department to other budget areas.
It is irresponsible to continue allocation more than a third of the budget to an already bloated department. Why
are we discontinuing any Community & Econ Development? That will be needed the most!
Please consider having the Police department incur the full or more than 75% of the projected $75,000,490
COVID related reductions.
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our economic recovery
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our public health recovery
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our regional wealth development
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our community support services, particularly those that
will be crucial to the development of our youth
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our public trust of government
Honestly, having the police department take the full reductions makes the budget look much healthier and will
aid Anaheim in becoming a World Class destination again.
PS World Class cities take care of their own citizens.
City Administration 5%
Finance, 4%
4%
City AIttorney 3%
City Clerk, 1%
Human Resources , 1%
City cauncil j 1'e"S
C onvenlion, Sports and
Entertainment,. O.ILIL%
Community Services., 12%
Corner unity Economic
Development 0.001�}
Planning &
B I d i 8%
,
ui ng, or
P'u b I i c Works, 7%: M
PLiblic Utilities i%
City AdMin, stratiron 5-%
Frances, 141'a
nce. 4%
Ay Attorney7,3%
y
pityD ity Clerk, I
ity
H u
, Ma 17 1%
uman Resources .
CityCoun,cil 0.50% M
-Convention, -Sports. and
Entertainment., 0.11%
Community Services 13%
-Corn mnu nity a n d Economic
Development 034'1',':. Planning &
Building, 8%
P u b 11,1C
Works,
8%
Public Utilities I JL%
Pal is
Fire & Rescue ,
Poli
Fire & Rescue
Public Comment
From: Megan Mitchell
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12-55 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Ensuring community safety
To the Anaheim City Council:
I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a.
radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in
Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of
the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010, Anaheim Police Department killed 33
people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California.
am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members and to decrease police budget. The
money that goes towards policing would better serve the community by funding mental health services, education, and
social services.
Thank you for your time.
Public Comment
From:
Shelbi
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:06 PM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
General Comment
To the members of Anaheim's City Council the proposed budget for 2020/2021 shows that 65% of the funds
would be allocated into "keeping us safe" as the budget calls it otherwise known as police and fire departments.
65%. When voters are calling for defunding the police that is because of numbers like this. If we took any
percent of that huge number and put that back into the community, into education, into supporting fair housing
practices, into food banks, into mental health resources, any program that benefits the community directly crime
would go down and that would be keeping us safe. If we took 10-20% of that budget it would be life changing
for more than just the 409 sworn in police officers on staff. It would be beneficial in the long run for the city
and residents as more children would get better education, better living conditions, better access to health care.
Poverty is why crime happens and throwing money at a band-aid isn't going to stop the infection. We are not
asking to abolish the police but know we are aware of the ridiculously high amount of this city's budget is going
into one small part of what makes a city functional. Know we are aware of who is voting for this inane
proposal. And lastly know we will keep those who vote for it accountable.
Thank you for your time. Sincerely resident and voter.
Public Comment
From:
Jamey Stambler
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11.47 AM
To:
Public Comment
Cc:
Jamey Stambler
Subject:
Please DO NOT LAYOFF City Employees
Dear City Council,
I work for Anaheim Public Utilities in the Integrated Resources Department and I am emailing to urge the Anaheim City
Council to do everything in your power to not layoff city employees. Since the start of the COVID-19 crisis, employees
have worked diligently to mitigate the impacts to the City of Anaheim. If not for our important work the financial and
social outlook would likely be far worse than it is currently.
Laying off staff instead of finding alternative measures is a short term solution that could have extremely negative
longer-term consequences. For many departments, mine included, the amount of work we have has not decreased as a
result of the crisis, but actually increased. Cutting staff would almost surely cause the remaining staff to be
overburdened and cause expensive mistakes to be made. once the current crisis begins to abate it will be even more
imperative to have staff on hand in the departments that may have seen their work decrease during this period. We
need trained personnel that can meet this need so that the City can get back on its feet rapidly. It is expensive and time-
consuming to rehire staff, and if that staff needs to be trained that only exacerbates the issue further.
Please strive to find alternative methods to get the City through this trying time so that employees that have worked
arduously for this City can remain employed, provide for their families, and help quicken the City's ascension out of this
crisis.
Thank you for your time,
Jamey Stambler
Integrated Resources Planner II
Anaheim Public Utilities
Public Comment
From: Katherine Rosecrance
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:07 AM
Subject: Police are not protecting Anaheim residents
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Katherine, and I am a 2nd year medical student at UCI and resident of Orange County. I am writing
in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. A deliberate shift in our concept of policing
and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim disproportionately affects
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end. Policing has always been and clearly continues to be
a public health crisis.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget and
some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the
2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths
caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California. The rate of deaths committed by Anaheim PD exceeds the rate of murder committed by
non -police officers. It is clear that Anaheim PD is doing more harm than good for our community.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,00,0 dollars of taxpayer
money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to
surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to
improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in. creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned
community refuse to remain silent on the use of policing to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Katherine Rosecrance
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
Public Comment
From: Alex Murillo
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10.52 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public Comment for City Council Meeting June 23rd, 2020 -Alexandra
To whom it concerns,
I was born and raised in Anaheim and still live here. Though I have always had respect for the APD, in general the police
department in America is making it very hard to find reasons to respect them. As a person of color, we need
improvements, we need more than words, we need actions. I have a full time job but I also have a part-time job working
in Anaheim with the Y not because I need the money but because working with children and help improving the
community of Anaheim means a lot to me. I am a product of after school programs and having a single mother work to
care for me and my siblings, if it wasn't for those after school programs, I wouldn't be the person I am today. I ask that
you please please, when it comes to budgeting, to give the most attention to the programs that would benefit our
families and kids. With programs like the YMCA do so much already with what they have, I can only imagine what they
could do with more help financially. I know this is long and won't be read aloud but I hope someone is reading this and I
hope someone who has a chance to make a change please, consider the future of this city and how you can improve it.
1 also recommend if money still goes to ADP that some goes towards yearly anti -racism and de-escalation training.
Thank you for your time.
-Alexandra
Public Comment
From: Kayla Saunders
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:18 AM
To: Public Comment
Hello City Council,
I'm Kayla Saunders. I would like to submit commentary in support of approving and/or increasing the budget
for policies that would better our communities, specifically Black people and people of color.
Item 101 the Prison to Employment Initiative Agreement, approves grant funds with a maximum of $900,000
for two years. Seeing as the total police budget for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 was over $170 million, Anaheim's
City Council can and should divest more funds into rehabilitating and hiring former prisoners. Please consider
raising this maximum and continuing to support this initiative.
As an avid protestor and supporter of the Black Lives Matter initiative, I am eager to hear more about
Anaheim's new policing policies, and your statements on Black Lives Matter and peaceful protesting.
Thank you for your consideration.
Kind regards,
Kayla Saunders
Public Comment
From:
Marlene Alcantar
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:50 AM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
Budget
Council,
I am an Anaheim resident, have been for almost all of my life, and I am extremely concerned at the decisions
that have been made in regards to the budget and community funds in this city. Rather than reappropriating
money from other, over -inflated, and unnecessary budgets (e.g. the police budget) you instead chose to cut
funds to essential community programs, potentially ending youth support systems and laying off YOUR part-
time workers during a PANDEMIC (who are already taken advantage of and treated poorly with stagnant
wages, no benefits, and non-union labor practices).
You prioritize policing our communities rather than providing the services necessary for them to thrive and
prosper. Our youth in particular need these services; many of them come from working-class families and do
not have access to any other programs other than those we provide. I think that this council needs to seriously
get their priorities straight.
And I am not going to even get started on how you prioritize Disney and other tourist businesses over your own
community.
Sincerely,
A concerned, irritated, and fed up Anaheim resident
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:56 AM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Comments for 2PM Closed Session today 6-23-2020
Hello Councilmembers and Labor Negotiators,
Please place a moratorium on any decisionmaking that would increase expenditures for our city budget. There
has yet to be an accepted proposed budget to mitigate COVID 19 impacts to revenues. This is not the time to
make decisions that will create undue burden to the budgeting process, particularly as it pertains to clarity in
providing adequate funds to support our community to endure through these turbulent times.
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner
District 2
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:55 AM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Comments for 3PM Workshop - Proposed Fiscal Year 2020/21
Hello Councilmembers,
Please continue conversations to reallocate monies from the Police department to other budget areas.
It is irresponsible to continue allocation more than a third of the budget to an already bloated department. Why
are we discontinuing any Community & Econ Development? That will be needed the most!
Please consider having the Police department incur the full or more than 75% of the projected $75,000,490
COVID related reductions.
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our economic recovery
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our public health recovery
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our regional wealth development
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our community support services, particularly those that
will be crucial to the development of our youth
A heavily budgeted Police department will not aid in our public trust of government
Honestly, having the police department take the full reductions makes the budget look much healthier and will
aid Anaheim in becoming a World Class destination again.
PS World Class cities take care of their own citizens.
City Administration 5%
Finance, 4%
4%
City AIttorney 3%
City Clerk, 1%
Human Resources , 1%
City cauncil j 1'e"S
C onvenlion, Sports and
Entertainment,. O.ILIL%
Community Services., 12%
Corner unity Economic
Development 0.001�}
Planning &
B I d i 8%
,
ui ng, or
P'u b I i c Works, 7%: M
PLiblic Utilities i%
City AdMin, stratiron 5-%
Frances, 141'a
nce. 4%
Ay Attorney7,3%
y
pityD ity Clerk, I
ity
H u
, Ma 17 1%
uman Resources .
CityCoun,cil 0.50% M
-Convention, -Sports. and
Entertainment., 0.11%
Community Services 13%
-Corn mnu nity a n d Economic
Development 034'1',':. Planning &
Building, 8%
P u b 11,1C
Works,
8%
Public Utilities I JL%
Pal is
Fire & Rescue ,
Poli
Fire & Rescue
Public Comment
From: Megan Mitchell
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12-55 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Ensuring community safety
To the Anaheim City Council:
I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a.
radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in
Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some of
the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010, Anaheim Police Department killed 33
people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California.
am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members and to decrease police budget. The
money that goes towards policing would better serve the community by funding mental health services, education, and
social services.
Thank you for your time.
Public Comment
From:
Shelbi
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:06 PM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
General Comment
To the members of Anaheim's City Council the proposed budget for 2020/2021 shows that 65% of the funds
would be allocated into "keeping us safe" as the budget calls it otherwise known as police and fire departments.
65%. When voters are calling for defunding the police that is because of numbers like this. If we took any
percent of that huge number and put that back into the community, into education, into supporting fair housing
practices, into food banks, into mental health resources, any program that benefits the community directly crime
would go down and that would be keeping us safe. If we took 10-20% of that budget it would be life changing
for more than just the 409 sworn in police officers on staff. It would be beneficial in the long run for the city
and residents as more children would get better education, better living conditions, better access to health care.
Poverty is why crime happens and throwing money at a band-aid isn't going to stop the infection. We are not
asking to abolish the police but know we are aware of the ridiculously high amount of this city's budget is going
into one small part of what makes a city functional. Know we are aware of who is voting for this inane
proposal. And lastly know we will keep those who vote for it accountable.
Thank you for your time. Sincerely resident and voter.
Public Comment
From:
Jamey Stambler
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11.47 AM
To:
Public Comment
Cc:
Jamey Stambler
Subject:
Please DO NOT LAYOFF City Employees
Dear City Council,
I work for Anaheim Public Utilities in the Integrated Resources Department and I am emailing to urge the Anaheim City
Council to do everything in your power to not layoff city employees. Since the start of the COVID-19 crisis, employees
have worked diligently to mitigate the impacts to the City of Anaheim. If not for our important work the financial and
social outlook would likely be far worse than it is currently.
Laying off staff instead of finding alternative measures is a short term solution that could have extremely negative
longer-term consequences. For many departments, mine included, the amount of work we have has not decreased as a
result of the crisis, but actually increased. Cutting staff would almost surely cause the remaining staff to be
overburdened and cause expensive mistakes to be made. once the current crisis begins to abate it will be even more
imperative to have staff on hand in the departments that may have seen their work decrease during this period. We
need trained personnel that can meet this need so that the City can get back on its feet rapidly. It is expensive and time-
consuming to rehire staff, and if that staff needs to be trained that only exacerbates the issue further.
Please strive to find alternative methods to get the City through this trying time so that employees that have worked
arduously for this City can remain employed, provide for their families, and help quicken the City's ascension out of this
crisis.
Thank you for your time,
Jamey Stambler
Integrated Resources Planner II
Anaheim Public Utilities
Public Comment
From: Katherine Rosecrance
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:07 AM
Subject: Police are not protecting Anaheim residents
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Katherine, and I am a 2nd year medical student at UCI and resident of Orange County. I am writing
in deep concern for the health of the greater Anaheim community. A deliberate shift in our concept of policing
and community health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim disproportionately affects
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end. Policing has always been and clearly continues to be
a public health crisis.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget and
some of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the
2019-2020 budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths
caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average for
police in California. The rate of deaths committed by Anaheim PD exceeds the rate of murder committed by
non -police officers. It is clear that Anaheim PD is doing more harm than good for our community.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,00,0 dollars of taxpayer
money on surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to
surveillance be halted. I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to
improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in. creating programs that benefit and enrich the
community.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned
community refuse to remain silent on the use of policing to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Katherine Rosecrance
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
Public Comment
From: Alex Murillo
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10.52 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public Comment for City Council Meeting June 23rd, 2020 -Alexandra
To whom it concerns,
I was born and raised in Anaheim and still live here. Though I have always had respect for the APD, in general the police
department in America is making it very hard to find reasons to respect them. As a person of color, we need
improvements, we need more than words, we need actions. I have a full time job but I also have a part-time job working
in Anaheim with the Y not because I need the money but because working with children and help improving the
community of Anaheim means a lot to me. I am a product of after school programs and having a single mother work to
care for me and my siblings, if it wasn't for those after school programs, I wouldn't be the person I am today. I ask that
you please please, when it comes to budgeting, to give the most attention to the programs that would benefit our
families and kids. With programs like the YMCA do so much already with what they have, I can only imagine what they
could do with more help financially. I know this is long and won't be read aloud but I hope someone is reading this and I
hope someone who has a chance to make a change please, consider the future of this city and how you can improve it.
1 also recommend if money still goes to ADP that some goes towards yearly anti -racism and de-escalation training.
Thank you for your time.
-Alexandra
Public Comment
From: Pat D
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:58 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Today's Council meeting
Good morning
While very disappointed that our city is doing nothing to accommodate public comments, live in the room
while you are making decisions that impact all of us for a great deal of time, I offer the following:
Looking at a very lengthy agenda I'd like to make comments on several items:
On the budget workshop.
Our budget is a mess you need to look at redirecting law enforcement resources from public safety to provide
resources to the community members and programs that provide foundational services to our community. These
include housing, mental health, support services that all need increased revenue. Staffing cuts would be very
difficult at this time. Quality of life is not enhanced by inflated PD budget. Their grants are targeted. Recent
salary increases didn't help our bottom line.
You need to identify revenue streams which should include gate taxes and fees that tourists could and should
cover.
Item 8
Forgive monthly rent -what a great idea, but wait it's for a golf course! How about our families who are in
desperate need of help. Your rent subsidy program might make you feel good but it is not a long term solution
nor adequate. We need permanent rents subsidies and affordable housing.
Item 26
1 am in support of the Black Lives Matter resolution. Unfortunately it was slow in coming.
Item 29
In the COVID update I hope there's discussion of the honesty the city needs to use in reporting numbers.
Misrepresenting the fact that our numbers are growing attributing them only because of testing is dishonest.
Masks are now a reality and I am hoping that code enforcement or other oversight groups will be given the
authority to oversee the requirement of masks for businesses and individual compliance. They need to create a
plan for education and citing when lack of compliance. Businesses will suffer if there's not clarity that it's a
requirement and if not done and further shutdown occurs, our economy will once again be tanked.
Item 32 and any zoning amendments
Any residential developments must include low and very low income units. Why do you continue ignore
RHNA goals and give away these opportunities create housing stood most in need?
Any zoning maps changed are another place you could include a requirement for low and very low income
housing. There must be inclusion in any and all building projects. The pittance level buyouts are unforgivable,
giving away land and livable opportunities for the majority of our community.
Finally I do expect before the next meeting the city will have established a method for call-in live participation
for comments. Those of us who are risk of COVID- 19 due to health complications will not be able to be a live
participant any time soon. I also find the e-mails are inefficient, likely unread, and not giving folks the
opportunity to hear how people are thinking. In addition you each should be on video so that we can see your
level of focus and participation.
Thank you
Pat Davis
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos.
Public Comment
From:
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8.59 PM
To: Public Comment
Cc:
Subject: Public Hearings Comments June 23, 2020
Attachments: Public Hearings June 23, 2020.pdf
Attached is the Public comment for each of the Public Hearings, Agenda items # 30. 31. & 32.
Once again, the un-American actions of the City of Anaheim will quash our FREEDOM of SPEECH
by attempting to legalize public hearings without the public present.
Anaheim Council Public Hearing Comments for June 23, 2020,
For Each Public Hearing, Agenda Items # 30, 31 & 32
VIA EMAIL TO: publiecommentLaanaheim.net
FROM: Home Owners Maintaining our Environment
:'jj
It is outrageous to have Public Hearings without first allowing public
speakers the rights to be present at the hearing and listen to the opening hearing
presentations, p
rior to the public comments session. Without thepublic allowed
to speak by phone or in person, the Public HearinLys would not be public or le al.
Having the Public Hearing Comments made in writing prior to the
Anaheim council meeting is ridicules. At the start of a legitimate Public
Hearing, the moving party gives their arguments before the Public Comments.
Based on those opening arguments, if given or not, indications for comments are
made if the matter is to benefit the City of Anaheim, or only to benefit the
moving parties and the financial wealth* of the council members.
At the beginning of a legitimate Public Hearing, each voting council
member must disclosed by law to the public if they had prior contact and
discussions with the moving party concerning the matter of the Public Hearing.
This state law was made to alert the public of the possibilities of secret future
bribes, kickbacks, or other deals being made to entice a favorable vote from a
council member. When all the council members are able to state they did not
meet with any of the moving parties, the public can be assured that the hearing
matter should be taken as a whole to benefit the City of Anaheim. That would
make taking the time to speak at a Public Hearing almost unnecessary.
Therefore, Comments must be made during the Hearing, not prior in writing.
Another indication of corruption is why there were three Public Hearings
scheduled all at once for the present and possible last council meeting where the
public are not allowed to be present. These three Public Hearings should be
continued to the council meeting on. July 14, 2020 or later, that may be open to
the public,
*Past Anaheim councilmembers had questionable increases in their
personal wealth from serving on the Anaheim City Council. Examples are Tom
Tait with his promoting the 1998 $500 million rebate of our tax money to
Disneyland for California Adventure, and the current mayor in the 2012 hotel
rebate deal of about $156 million for his fellow countryman, a Mr. Patel,
Jennifer L. Hall
From: Loretta Day
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 8:23 AM
To: Gregory Garcia; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Kring; Lucille
Kring; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Trevor O'Neil
Cc: Theresa Bass; Jennifer L. Hall; Lauren Torres; Lisa Hughes; Amanda Edinger; Annie
Mezzacappa; Cynthia Ward; Daniel Fierro; Helen Myers; Justin Glover; Karen Romero
Estrada; Maria Gonzalez; Marisol Ramirez; Nam Bartash; Samantha Saenz; Sarah Bartczak
Subject: FW: Tuesday Agenda
For Mayor and Council consideration.
From: Gloria MaaE
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 5:15 PM
To: Council <council@anaheim.net>
Subject: Tuesday Agenda
Mayor and council,
I support Anaheim PIS and support investing as much as possible to maintain our level of officers if not increase
it.
I do not support any official backing of BLM. The BLM movement peaceful protests are blurred by the hate on
display throughout our city and country. We should NEVER support hate.
Lastly, all emails in support or against any Anaheim issue should not be considered if not from a resident or
business of Anaheim.
Thank you,
Gloria Ma'ae
From:
Loretta Day
To:
Gregory Garcia; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Krina; Lucille Krina; Harry Sidhu (Mayor);
Stephen Faessel; Trevor o"Neil
Cc:
Lauren Torres; Theresa Bass; .Jennifer L. Hall; Lisa Hughes; Amanda Edinger; Annie Mezzacappa; Cynthia Ward;
Daniel Fierro; Helen Myers; Justin Glover; Karen Romero Estrada; Maria Gonzalez; Marisol Ramirez; Nam
Bartash; Samantha Saenz; Sarah Bartczak
Subject:
FW: An opportunity for Recovery in Anaheim
Date:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:01:49 PM
Attachments:
Anaheim Resort User Fee 6.22.2020.pdf
Importance:
High
Mayor and council members — please see the attached for your consideration.
From: Helen Myers <HMyers@anaheim.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:47 AM
To: Loretta Clay <LDay anahelm.net>
Subject: FW: An Opportunity for Recovery in Anaheim
From: William Taormina
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:23 AM
To: Helen Myers <HMyersC@anaheim.net>
Subject: Re: An opportunity for Recovery in Anaheim
Helen
Please read this and give it to the entire city council. I have been trying to get traction on this
for three years. When we adopt this we can raise over $25mm per year.
Thank you for your service!
Bill Taormina
On Mon. Jun 22, 2020 at 2:59 PM Helen Myers <HHMMv, ers .anaheim.net> wrote:
Hello Friends, Neighbors, and Residents of Anaheim,
Like many communities, Anaheim is dealing with a shortfall in our City budget due to the
economic disruption of Covid- 19. A gap of $75MM to $100MM stands between Anaheim
City Hall and the ability to provide the world-class services that residents, business partners,
and visitors have come to expect from us. Cutting services is not acceptable. on the other
hand, Anaheim does not raise money on the backs of our taxpayers. We just don't.
Unlike other communities, Anaheim is uniquely positioned to face the challenge.
We are uniquely positioned to overcome our budget crisis thanks to the economic strength
of millions of visitors who enjoy Anaheim's warm hospitality every year, visitors who will
return when it is safe to do so. We enjoy the skills of highly qualified professional staff
searching every municipal couch cushion for loose change as we speak. Anaheim also
enjoys a legendary partnership with the private business sector, combining the strength of
City Hall with the creativity of entrepreneurs. Most importantly, Anaheim is also led by 7
elected officials that we feel certain are able to set aside the issues that have divided us so
far, and work together for the greater good of Anaheim's people.
Thinking outside the box is what Anaheim does best. We call it, "The Anaheim Way."
For decades, Anaheim has hosted tens of millions of visitors every year, with hotel taxes
paid by those visitors providing about one fourth of our General Fund revenues, after
expenses reflecting long-term investments in the Resort made by Anaheim taxpayers. Until
now, those visitors have offered a huge return on our investment, helping to cover some of
our daily expenses, in addition to funding bond payments covering past Resort
improvements.
Industry experts tell us that long-distance visitors will not be returning in great numbers for
some time, and our Resort patrons will be coming from the surrounding region for day -trips.
This means Anaheim will support visitors with the same services and amenities,
as well as our obligation for Resort improvements, while collecting far less in taxes without
hotel stays.
The ideal solution seems to be devising a way for those day trips to translate to revenue,
covering the loss of overnight stays without reaching into the pockets of our residents and
local businesses. This has been discussed in the past, with news media reporting an
"admission fee" for entertainment tickets, including theme parks and sports venues, has
shown to be very popular with residents. These proposals have always been rejected by the
City Council for a variety of reasons before voters could weigh in.
In the early 1990s an admissions tax of $1 per person was considered, to prevent cutting
core services during a $20MM budget shortfall. Instead, City leaders imposed a tax on
utility bills, burdening Anaheim residents through an essential service rather than ask a
minimal contribution based on a luxury expenditure. That choice cost leaders their seats in
elected office.
We owe it to Anaheim stakeholders to consider every opportunity to correct the budget
deficit we face, while preserving services provided by City staff. Those services translate
directly to quality of life for our residents, and property values for those who invest in
Anaheim.
If the City Council does not work with business partners to create an agreeable solution, it
is certain that an outside group will force the issue through a citizen initiative and special
election, likely without the input of those whose patrons will be contributing the fee.
As Council members, we often disagree, sometimes passionately. We are likely to disagree
about whether to place a new "Local Services Premium" of minimal cost on entertainment
admission prices onto the November ballot. Even if we agree to this purpose, we are likely
to have different views regarding which entities might be exempted from such an effort, to
protect those who would be harmed by increased cost to their patrons, and we are certain to
disagree on how the funds may be spent. It is also possible that voters may reject such a
proposition.
What is certain is that the idea merits consideration, which can only be done in an open and
public meeting of your elected leaders. On Tuesday, June 23rd, we expect to raise this
subject during the Council Communications portion of our meeting, where we trust our
colleagues will step up with the support needed to place an item on an upcoming agenda for
discussion.
We hope we can bring all stakeholders in for a lively debate, to craft a revenue stream that
is agreeable to all involved, rather than imposing a measure on the private sector from the
ballot box. We want to invite discussion with residents, businesses, our non-profit groups,
educators, and our professional staff, to identify the expenditures you feel are most
important to preserve and direct funds to those key areas. We want to find tools to protect
new revenue streams from being diverted to special interests, and ensure fair and equitable
distribution of funds, so that all 6 Council districts enjoy the benefits of funding, with the
leaders you have chosen to represent your area having the last word on projects and
programs in each area.
Most of all, we need to hear from you.
Denise Barnes
Anaheim City Council Member
West Anaheim District I
DBames(&,Anaheim.net
Dr. Jose Moreno
Anaheim City Council Member
Central District 3
imoreno .anaheim.net
If you do not wish to receive emails from us in the future, please reply with unsubscribe
and we will immediately comply with your request.
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH
IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL,
AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAWS. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately.
Thank you.
1
DRAFT AS OF 6/22/2020
Anaheim Resort User Fee (ARUF)
Mission statement: Via the voluntary collection of a small one time user fee for
each resort hotel guest, and, sports or entertainment venue ticket. The ARUF will
generate a sustainable income stream separate from the Anaheim General Fund
to be invested and disbursed by an appointed commission of stakeholders to
directly benefit the resort worker community, enhance the quality of life for all
local citizens, support our fire and police departments, fund a permanent solution
for affordable housing and a cure for homelessness in and around the city of
Anaheim.
Aspects of the ARUF:
1) This is nota "tax" and will absolutely not impact the profitabilitX of
any resort -related business.
2) Resort and entertainment stakeholders will collect these funds on
behalf of aself-appointed Quality of Life Commission (QOLC)
composed of a diverse cross section of Anaheim citizens and
business owners.
3) The ARUF would be based on a "one time per person per visit" fee.
Upon hotel checkout, $1.00 would be collected from each resort
visitor. For example: Say a family of five visits the resort for a week.
When they check out there will be a one-time charge on their hotel bill
of $5.00. Also, this $1.00 user fee would be applied to every ticket to
P�
any professional sports or entertainment event at any city -owned
venue.
4) ARUF funds will be electronically deposited into a secured trustee
account that would NOT be a part of the City's General Fund. These
funds will be held in trust and dispersed via a formal protocol of the
privately controlled Quality of Life Commission.
5) To cover any cost of administration and oversight, stakeholders will
retain 3% of the funds they collect.
6) The QOLC will be composed of 12 members. All QOLC appointees
must reside in, own property in, or be employed by a business in
Anaheim. Appointees will be chosen from both representative
geographic areas in the city and other relevant stakeholder groups.
a) City Council District One Appointment -
b) City Council District Two Appointment -
c) City Council District Three Appointment -
d) City Council District Four Appointment -
e) City Council District Five Appointment -
f) City Council District Six Appointment -
g) City Council Mayor's Appointment -
h) Business Sector Appointment -
i) Faith Based Appointment -
j) Education Based Appointment -
k) Anaheim Community Services Appointment -
I) QOLC Executive Director -
3
7) The QOLC will initially have one full time Executive Director and one
full time Assistant Director. Staff salaries and headcount will grow at a
pace tied to the demand for services. All staff costs and other
overhead will be funded from the revenues received from the ARUF
via an annual budget.
8) Distribution of the ARUF funds will be done via a formal application
process. Applications will be accepted from pre -approved 501 C-3
organizations that are based in and around Anaheim.
9) ARUF funds may be used for the following types of need fulfillment:
a) Capital Projects that require " seed funding" wherein the ARUF
funds would be used as Zero Interest short term loans, bridge
financing, construction deposits, etc. all to be paid back over an
agreed upon period of time.
b) Zero Interest Loans for rental deposits to enable families to
procure apartments and move out of motels and/or
overcrowded apartments and into more dignified and
permanent housing alternatives.
c) Zero Interest Loans for down payments to purchase vehicles to
be used for Transportation to and from work.
d) Zero Interest Loans for College Tuition, Continuing Education,
or Job Skills Enhancement.
e) Zero Interest Loans for Emergency Medical Situations.
f) Grants for Non -Profit organizations to establish and operate
Continuing Technical Education and Job Skills Enhancement
Programs.
g) Grants for Non -Profit organizations to establish and operate Job
Training and Job Enhancement Programs.
h) Grants for Non -Profit organizations to establish and operate
Neighborhood Clean-up Programs.
i) Grants for Non -Profit organizations to establish and operate
Drug Treatment programs.
j) Grants for Non -Profit organizations to establish and operate
both Youth and Adult Recreational and After School Programs.
k) Grants or Zero Interest Loans for Non -Profit organizations to
establish and operate sustainable solutions for Homelessness
with a special focus on funding the development and operation
of:
i) Emergency Shelters
ii) Transitional Housing
iii) Permanent Supportive Housing
iv) Affordable Housing
10) The QOLC will meet monthly in the Gordon Hoyt Conference
Center at City Hall West from 6:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. Meetings will
feature a typical agenda along with guest speakers and reports from
experts in the relevant field of interest.
9
11) No funding of any political candidate or political initiative will be
paid from ARUF funds. However, the QOLC may use ARUF funds to
issue direct mail or other forms of advertising/promotion in order to
educate the general public about the QOLC and the important
projects and organizations it is funding.
12) The QOLC will issue Monthly Activity and Financial Reports online.
As a courtesy, the QOLC will issue an Annual Report to the Anaheim
City Manager that describes the funds collected and how said funds
were disbursed for the benefit of the citizens of Anaheim.
For More Information Please Contact:
William C. "Bill" Taormina
CEO & Founder - Clean City, Inc.
Cell/Text
From: Public Comment
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Krina; Trevor
0"Neil
Cc: Amanda Edinger; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios(arianna0communicationslab.com); Cynthia Ward; Daniel
Fierro (daniel(@presidiosc.com); David Belmer; Gregory Garcia; Helen Myers; Justin Glover; Karen Romero
Estrada; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Marisol Ramirez; Nam Bartash; Robert Fabela; Samantha Saenz; Sarah
Bartczak; Theresa Bass
Subject: FW: Action Required!
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:02:00 PM
-----Original Message -----
From: Jenny Valle
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:02 PM
To: Public Comment <publiccomment@a anaheim.net>
Subject: Action Required!
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Jenny Valle, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40%a of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. we as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Jenny Valle
From: Public Comment
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Krina; Trevor
0"Neil
Cc: Amanda Edinger; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios(arianna0communicationslab.com); Cynthia Ward; Daniel
Fierro (daniel(@presidiosc.com); David Belmer; Gregory Garcia; Helen Myers; Justin Glover; Karen Romero
Estrada; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Marisol Ramirez; Nam Bartash; Robert Fabela; Samantha Saenz; Sarah
Bartczak; Theresa Bass
Subject: FW: City of Anaheim Employees
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:21:00 PM
_----Original Message---_y-
From: Ana Lilia Camacho
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:20 PM
To: Public Comment <publiccomment@a anaheim.net>
Subject: City of Anaheim Employees
To whom it may concern,
This email is to urge the City of Anaheim's City Manager to NOT lay off its city employees but find another way to
balance the budget.
A concern City of Anaheim Resident.
Ana Camacho
From: Public Comment
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille Krina; Trevor
0"Neil
Cc: Amanda Edinger; Annie Mezzacappa; Arianna Barrios(arianna0communicationslab.com); Cynthia Ward; Daniel
Fierro (daniel(@presidiosc.com); David Belmer; Gregory Garcia; Helen Myers; Justin Glover; Karen Romero
Estrada; Kristin Pelletier; Lisa Hughes; Marisol Ramirez; Nam Bartash; Robert Fabela; Samantha Saenz; Sarah
Bartczak; Theresa Bass
Subject: FW: What are you going to do??
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:27:00 PM
-----Original Message -__--
From: Emily Yates
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:27 PM
Subject: What are you going to do??
To the Anaheim City Council:
My name is Emily and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern for the health of the greater
Anaheim community. It has become more than clear that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community
health must take place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected Black and
Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have the largest military budget, and some
of the most well -funded and militarized police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020
budget allocated $153,8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2016, Anaheim Police Department killed
33 people during the process of arrest, and nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related
deaths caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, NYPD, and San Fran PD and is 74% higher than the average
for police in California.
I demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend $700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on
surveillance technology of anti -police brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted.
I also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $ 100,000 to improve 10 police vehicles.
Instead, invest that money in creating programs that benefit and enrich the community especially during a global
pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members. We as a concerned community
refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Emily Yates
Sent from my iPhone
From: Jazmin Tapia
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno; Lucille
Krina; Tremor o"Neil
Subject: Reallocate egregious police budgets towards education, social services, and dismantling racial injustice
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 10:29:12 AM
To the Anaheim city council:
My name is Jazmin, and I am a resident of Anaheim. I am writing in deep concern
for the health of the greater Anaheim community. It has become more than clear
that a radical shift in our concept of policing and community health must take
place at the local level. Police violence in Anaheim has disproportionately affected
Black and Brown residents and that must come to an end.
The United States does not have a national healthcare system. Instead, we have
the largest military budget, and some of the most well -funded and militarized
police departments in the world. Anaheim is no different: the 2019-2020 budget
allocated $153.8 million to law enforcement and only $1 million to community
development.
Anaheim is the 9th most violent police department in the U.S. From 2003-2010,
Anaheim Police Department killed 33 people during the process of arrest, and
nearly 40% of them were unarmed. Since 2014, the rate of arrest -related deaths
caused by Anaheim PD exceeds that of LAPD, TPD, and San Fran PD and is
74% higher than the average for police in California.
demand that the city council not approve "Resolution 19" that would spend
$700,000 dollars of taxpayer money on surveillance technology of anti -police
brutality protests and that any future projects related to surveillance be halted. I
also demand that the council not approve "Resolution 5" that will use $100,000 to
improve 10 police vehicles. Instead, invest that money in creating programs that
benefit and enrich the community especially during a global pandemic.
I am calling on our elected officials to stop criminalizing our community members.
We as a concerned community refuse to remain silent on the use of technology to
further terrorize our community.
Thank you,
Jazmin Tapia
Public Comments Distributed to the Anaheim City Council
June 23, 2020 Council Meeting
Updated 3:00 P.M. — Tuesday, June 23, 2020
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:43 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Resolution 31 comments
Yes.
We are long overdue to adhere to California Law & CalTrans guidelines to measure & consider VMT when
approving new developments.
Several of the designs that you have recently approved continue the provision of amenities for Single
Occupancy Vehicle use. There has been little to no improvements to connect to transit, or to increase access to
safe & efficient use of people powered transportation (active transportation).
We need to build our city to better support the movement of our community within the city. The current street
conditions instead provide space for people to speed through our community.
- Edgar
Public Comment
From:
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8.59 PM
To: Public Comment
Cc:
Subject: Public Hearings Comments June 23, 2020
Attachments: Public Hearings June 23, 2020.pdf
Attached is the Public comment for each of the Public Hearings, Agenda items # 30. 31. & 32.
Once again, the un-American actions of the City of Anaheim will quash our FREEDOM of SPEECH
by attempting to legalize public hearings without the public present.
Anaheim Council Public Hearing Comments for June 23, 2020,
For Each Public Hearing, Agenda Items # 30, 31 & 32
VIA EMAIL TO: publiecommentLaanaheim.net
FROM: Home Owners Maintaining our Environment
:'jj
It is outrageous to have Public Hearings without first allowing public
speakers the rights to be present at the hearing and listen to the opening hearing
presentations, p
rior to the public comments session. Without thepublic allowed
to speak by phone or in person, the Public HearinLys would not be public or le al.
Having the Public Hearing Comments made in writing prior to the
Anaheim council meeting is ridicules. At the start of a legitimate Public
Hearing, the moving party gives their arguments before the Public Comments.
Based on those opening arguments, if given or not, indications for comments are
made if the matter is to benefit the City of Anaheim, or only to benefit the
moving parties and the financial wealth* of the council members.
At the beginning of a legitimate Public Hearing, each voting council
member must disclosed by law to the public if they had prior contact and
discussions with the moving party concerning the matter of the Public Hearing.
This state law was made to alert the public of the possibilities of secret future
bribes, kickbacks, or other deals being made to entice a favorable vote from a
council member. When all the council members are able to state they did not
meet with any of the moving parties, the public can be assured that the hearing
matter should be taken as a whole to benefit the City of Anaheim. That would
make taking the time to speak at a Public Hearing almost unnecessary.
Therefore, Comments must be made during the Hearing, not prior in writing.
Another indication of corruption is why there were three Public Hearings
scheduled all at once for the present and possible last council meeting where the
public are not allowed to be present. These three Public Hearings should be
continued to the council meeting on. July 14, 2020 or later, that may be open to
the public,
*Past Anaheim councilmembers had questionable increases in their
personal wealth from serving on the Anaheim City Council. Examples are Tom
Tait with his promoting the 1998 $500 million rebate of our tax money to
Disneyland for California Adventure, and the current mayor in the 2012 hotel
rebate deal of about $156 million for his fellow countryman, a Mr. Patel,
Public Comments Distributed to the Anaheim City Council
June 23, 2020 Council Meeting
Updated 3:00 P.M. — Tuesday, June 23, 2020
Public Comment
From: Edgar Arellano
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:46 PM
To: Public Comment; Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan
Brandman; Lucille Kring; Jose Moreno; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Item 32 comments
Please bring up methods in which Anaheim can more intentionally build housing that is affordable, rather than
"attainable" for discussion tomorrow.
Last council meeting, 2 more luxury above average income "attainable" projects were approved without any
dedicated affordable housing allocation within approved project. Both project developers instead "contributed"
to a temporary senior housing assistance program rather than committing to provide affordable housing. Why is
this loophole being upheld as satisfactory to meet affordable housing requirements?
This is one of the projects mentioned last meeting and there is still no mention of affordable housing allocation
within the project.
Temporary housing assistance for the elderly does not equal affordable housing. This is especially true if elders
cannot find affordable housing to further stretch their temporary housing assistance.
The current RHNA housing allocation for above moderate income is double that which is remaining for all the
other income categories combined. Do something to satisfy the remaining 2906 units. You are allowing the rate
of luxury housing to outpace the housing needs of local Anaheim residents by more than 2 times .
Edgar Arellano
Resident & business owner - District 2
swir
RHN' 0+1 il'i'll! clint'l j Rom
Re Ir 111i t s Act r u V f %
A
II 040C I I ve RHNA ou*r~
Income I Issued
fo
(of &Y64ir r 8,Yow 2012 2014,2 01 All;=Mlori
C&Wgo,ry
in (2 y"rs to
p1m. In In 1.1tim" lewont Y*Wj If Y"r$
rid pof, I od CorM"bu) complVe'l
VWY Low
83 43 124 IRS
0�
Lm intome
786
24r
P4..Q.cw,a,te
1 338
36
a
50 m
t 4'1
n (_ of i
Above
PA4 d -o# to
, 1
.812
948
7,18-2 4:0, 1)
1 Ci
100
TOTAL
5.702 units
4,356 unNs
I tool Wft
T1471 11flit. 2,906 unit sk
units
0�
Public Comment
From: Pat D
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:58 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Today's Council meeting
Good morning
While very disappointed that our city is doing nothing to accommodate public comments, live in the room
while you are making decisions that impact all of us for a great deal of time, I offer the following:
Looking at a very lengthy agenda I'd like to make comments on several items:
On the budget workshop.
Our budget is a mess you need to look at redirecting law enforcement resources from public safety to provide
resources to the community members and programs that provide foundational services to our community. These
include housing, mental health, support services that all need increased revenue. Staffing cuts would be very
difficult at this time. Quality of life is not enhanced by inflated PD budget. Their grants are targeted. Recent
salary increases didn't help our bottom line.
You need to identify revenue streams which should include gate taxes and fees that tourists could and should
cover.
Item 8
Forgive monthly rent -what a great idea, but wait it's for a golf course! How about our families who are in
desperate need of help. Your rent subsidy program might make you feel good but it is not a long term solution
nor adequate. We need permanent rents subsidies and affordable housing.
Item 26
1 am in support of the Black Lives Matter resolution. Unfortunately it was slow in coming.
Item 29
In the COVID update I hope there's discussion of the honesty the city needs to use in reporting numbers.
Misrepresenting the fact that our numbers are growing attributing them only because of testing is dishonest.
Masks are now a reality and I am hoping that code enforcement or other oversight groups will be given the
authority to oversee the requirement of masks for businesses and individual compliance. They need to create a
plan for education and citing when lack of compliance. Businesses will suffer if there's not clarity that it's a
requirement and if not done and further shutdown occurs, our economy will once again be tanked.
Item 32 and any zoning amendments
Any residential developments must include low and very low income units. Why do you continue ignore
RHNA goals and give away these opportunities create housing stood most in need?
Any zoning maps changed are another place you could include a requirement for low and very low income
housing. There must be inclusion in any and all building projects. The pittance level buyouts are unforgivable,
giving away land and livable opportunities for the majority of our community.
Finally I do expect before the next meeting the city will have established a method for call-in live participation
for comments. Those of us who are risk of COVID- 19 due to health complications will not be able to be a live
participant any time soon. I also find the e-mails are inefficient, likely unread, and not giving folks the
opportunity to hear how people are thinking. In addition you each should be on video so that we can see your
level of focus and participation.
Thank you
Pat Davis
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos.
Public Comment
From:
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8.59 PM
To: Public Comment
Cc:
Subject: Public Hearings Comments June 23, 2020
Attachments: Public Hearings June 23, 2020.pdf
Attached is the Public comment for each of the Public Hearings, Agenda items # 30. 31. & 32.
Once again, the un-American actions of the City of Anaheim will quash our FREEDOM of SPEECH
by attempting to legalize public hearings without the public present.
Anaheim Council Public Hearing Comments for June 23, 2020,
For Each Public Hearing, Agenda Items # 30, 31 & 32
VIA EMAIL TO: publiecommentLaanaheim.net
FROM: Home Owners Maintaining our Environment
:'jj
It is outrageous to have Public Hearings without first allowing public
speakers the rights to be present at the hearing and listen to the opening hearing
presentations, p
rior to the public comments session. Without thepublic allowed
to speak by phone or in person, the Public HearinLys would not be public or le al.
Having the Public Hearing Comments made in writing prior to the
Anaheim council meeting is ridicules. At the start of a legitimate Public
Hearing, the moving party gives their arguments before the Public Comments.
Based on those opening arguments, if given or not, indications for comments are
made if the matter is to benefit the City of Anaheim, or only to benefit the
moving parties and the financial wealth* of the council members.
At the beginning of a legitimate Public Hearing, each voting council
member must disclosed by law to the public if they had prior contact and
discussions with the moving party concerning the matter of the Public Hearing.
This state law was made to alert the public of the possibilities of secret future
bribes, kickbacks, or other deals being made to entice a favorable vote from a
council member. When all the council members are able to state they did not
meet with any of the moving parties, the public can be assured that the hearing
matter should be taken as a whole to benefit the City of Anaheim. That would
make taking the time to speak at a Public Hearing almost unnecessary.
Therefore, Comments must be made during the Hearing, not prior in writing.
Another indication of corruption is why there were three Public Hearings
scheduled all at once for the present and possible last council meeting where the
public are not allowed to be present. These three Public Hearings should be
continued to the council meeting on. July 14, 2020 or later, that may be open to
the public,
*Past Anaheim councilmembers had questionable increases in their
personal wealth from serving on the Anaheim City Council. Examples are Tom
Tait with his promoting the 1998 $500 million rebate of our tax money to
Disneyland for California Adventure, and the current mayor in the 2012 hotel
rebate deal of about $156 million for his fellow countryman, a Mr. Patel,