Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PC 2020/10/26
10-26-2020 Page 1 of 5 City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, October 26, 2020 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairperson: Kimberly Keys • Chairperson Pro-Tempore: John Armstrong • Commissioners: Michelle Lieberman, Natalie Meeks, Rosa Mulleady, Dave Vadodaria, Steve White • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment SPECIAL NOTICE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act-related provisions of Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20, please be advised that Planning Commission members will participate in this meeting remotely. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 and given the current health concerns, members of the public can access the meeting live on-line, with audio and limited video, at www.anaheim.net/planning. In addition, members of the public can submit comments electronically for Planning Commission consideration by sending them to planningcommission@anaheim.net or directly to the project planner as indicated on each item below. To ensure distribution to the Planning Commission prior to consideration of the agenda, please submit comments prior to 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Those comments, as well as any comments received after 3:00 p.m., will be distributed to the Planning Commission members and will be made part of the official public record of the meeting. Contact the Planning and Building Department at 714-765-5139, the project planner listed below, or planningcommission@anaheim.net with any questions. A copy of the staff report may be obtained on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, October 22, 2020, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection by contacting the Building and Planning Department at 714-765-5139 or planningcommission@anaheim.net during regular business hours. 10-26-2020 Page 2 of 5 ACCESSIBILITY: If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, in order to observe and/or offer public comment may request such reasonable modification, accommodation, aid, or service by contacting the Building and Planning Department at 714-765-5139 or planningcommission@anaheim.net, no later than 8:00 a.m. on the day of the scheduled meeting. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. 10-26-2020 Page 3 of 5 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06068 (DEV2020-00083) Location: 555 North Euclid Street Request: The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit to construct a new 2,500 square foot coffee shop with a drive-through lane and outdoor patio. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Wayne Carvalho wcarvalho@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650B VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957B (DEV2020-00169) Location: 1952 West La Palma Avenue Request: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: (i) to amend a previously-approved Conditional Use Permit to modify plans for an existing baseball field on the Servite High School campus; and (ii) to amend a previously-approved Variance to permit 50-foot high fencing and 60-foot high poles around the existing baseball field where the Transition zone allows a maximum fence height of 8 feet. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Sophia Tatlyan statlyan@anaheim.net 10-26-2020 Page 4 of 5 ITEM NO. 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06069 (DEV2020-00087) Location: 1440 South Anaheim Boulevard Request: An appeal of the Planning Director’s approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit to permit paid and unpaid public parking spaces within the existing parking lot of the Anaheim Indoor Marketplace. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Peter Lange PLange@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, November 9, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. 10-26-2020 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 12:15 p.m. October 22, 2020 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: OCTOBER 26, 2020 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06068 LOCATION: 555 North Euclid Street APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The property owner is Anaheim Place Partners, L.P. represented by the applicant Joe Haupt of Spectrum Development Group Inc. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to construct a new 2,500 square foot Starbucks coffee shop with a drive-through lane and outdoor patio. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 3, New Construction) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06068. BACKGROUND: This 0.79-acre property is the site of a former 6,600 square foot Chase Bank building that was located at the southwest corner of Euclid Street and Crescent Avenue. The building was recently demolished to allow for the construction of the new Starbucks building. The property is located in the "C-G" General Commercial Zone, and the General Plan designates the property for Mixed Use land uses. Surrounding land uses include a new Chase Bank building and apartments to the south, the Anaheim Plaza commercial center to the east across Euclid Street, and commercial uses to the north across Crescent Avenue. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06068 October 26, 2020 Page 2 of 5 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 2,500 square foot Starbucks coffee shop with a drive-through lane and a 300 square foot outdoor patio area. Even though a seating plan is not shown on the floor plan, it is estimated that approximately 40 seats can be accommodated in the dining area. Access to the site would be provided from driveways adjacent to Euclid Street and Crescent Avenue, as well as through the shared parking lot south of the project site. The drive-through lane is designed to circulate counterclockwise around the coffee shop and provide vehicular stacking to accommodate up to 12 vehicles. If needed, queuing for an additional 1 to 2 vehicles could be accommodated through the parking area without impacting parking or on-site circulation. A detailed development summary is included as Attachment 1 to this report. Proposed Site Plan CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06068 October 26, 2020 Page 3 of 5 The building is designed with cement plaster finishes in off-white and mint green colors with cultured stone concrete tile veneers in neutral grey tones, metal canopies, and an aluminum storefront. Renderings here show the colors and design of the north and east elevations of the building which front both streets (also see rendering in Attachment 7). Proposed East Elevation (Euclid Street) The coffee shop would operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for both the café and the drive-through with up to eight employees per shift. Proposed North Elevation (Crescent Avenue) FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this Code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The purpose of the conditional use permit is to ensure proper design and function of the drive- through lane and that vehicular circulation does not impact surrounding properties. The drive- through lane would be accessible from Euclid Street to the east, as well as Crescent Avenue to the north through existing driveways. The drive-through lane would be separated from the street right-of-way by a 15-foot landscape setback along both arterial highways. Directional signage would be placed at key locations on-site, including a sign at the end of the drive-through lane and painted “keep clear” zones. The drive-through speaker would use technology that monitors CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06068 October 26, 2020 Page 4 of 5 ambient noise levels and decreases its volume when ambient noises are low (i.e., evening and early morning). The drive-through lane has a 12-vehicle capacity and is designed to minimize the probability of vehicles queueing onto Crescent Avenue and Euclid Street. A Queuing Study (Attachment 5) was submitted by the applicant and the study provides historical data collected from queuing studies at similar Starbucks locations within the past five years, including a Queuing Study for the Starbucks location at the southeast corner of State College Boulevard and Placentia Avenue in the City of Anaheim. The study concluded that the typical peak queue expected for this site would be 10-12 vehicles. A peak of 12 vehicles was observed intermittently between 8:00 a.m. and 8:45 a.m. The peak 85th percentile, which is estimated at 10.4 vehicles, would occur more frequently than the site peak and is within the queuing capacity of the proposed project. As noted above, the drive-through lane would have enough stacking distance for 12 vehicles, with room for another 1 to 2 vehicles directly outside the drive-through lane in the parking areas. Based on the above data and site design, staff believes that the proposed use would be compatible with the surrounding area and would minimize impacts to street traffic and on-site circulation. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit. The subject parcel is part of a larger commercial center owned and operated by the property owner. The property is also occupied with a new Chase Bank building, an existing 60,000 square foot, six-story office building, and a 17-unit senior apartment complex. All of these uses are located south of the Starbucks site and within the area bounded by Euclid Street, Crescent Avenue, Fairhaven Street and Westmont Drive. Sufficient parking would be provided for all of the uses in the block in a shared 174-space parking lot, as well as a new 90 space surface parking lot proposed on the south side of Westmont Drive. A parking analysis (Attachment 8) was prepared and the analysis concluded that adequate parking for all of the uses would be provided during each phase of off-site street improvements on Crescent Avenue and Euclid Street, construction of the surface parking lot, and development of the Starbucks project. The project complies with all development standards in the General Commercial zone, including maximum building height, floor area ratio, landscape and structural setbacks, and parking. Based on the coffee shop’s floor area, 28 parking spaces are required by Code. The project would provide 32 parking spaces, including two handicap spaces and two electric vehicle (EV) spaces. No variances are requested as part of this application. Community Outreach: The property manager of the apartment complex that shares the site with the other commercial uses on the block held a comprehensive project update meeting with the residents last year before the construction of the new Chase Bank building to give them a vision of the overall project. The applicant/property owner has been in on-going contact with these residents over the last year and have had no issues. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new small structures or facilities. In urbanized areas, this exemption applies to commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet. The proposed project is a 2,500 sq. ft. coffee shop with drive-through lane CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06068 October 26, 2020 Page 5 of 5 and 300 sq. ft. outdoor patio area; and, therefore, this exemption is applicable. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: The proposed drive-through coffee shop is consistent with the goals of the property’s General Commercial zoning, which includes neighborhood serving commercial uses. The drive-through lane is designed to minimize impacts to surrounding uses and to ensure proper on and off-site traffic flow. Additionally, the proposed number of parking spaces would be adequate to accommodate this drive-through and dine-in coffee shop. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Wayne Carvalho Niki Wetzel, AICP Contract Planner Deputy Planning and Building Director Attachments: 1. Development Summary 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 3. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations 4. Applicant’s Letter of Request 5. Queuing Study 6. Photographs 7. Colored Rendering 8. Parking Analysis C-G(MU)DEV2020-00083PARKING LOT C-GRETAIL C-GANAHEIM PLAZA(NORTH) C-GANAHEIM PLAZASHOPPING CENTER RM-4GLENCREST APTS31 DU C-G (MU) VACANT C-GANAHEIM PLAZASHOPPING CENTER C-G (MU) FAIRHAVEN HEIGHTS SENIOR CITIZEN APTS17 DU C-G (MU)PARKING LOT R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E N E U C L I D S TW CRESCENT AVE N M A N O R S T W WESTMONT DR N F A I R H A V E N S T N P A R K W O O D S T W. LA PALMA AVE W. BROADWAY W. W. LINCOLN AVE N . H A R B O R B L V D N . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . L O A R A S T W. ROMNEYA DR W.LINCOLNAVE W. LINCOLN AVE 555 North Euclid Street DEV No. 2020-00083 Subject Property APN: 072-211-45072-211-22 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2019 N E U C L I D S TW CRESCENT AVE N M A N O R S T W WESTMONT DR N F A I R H A V E N S T N P A R K W O O D S T W. LA PALMA AVE W. BROADWAY W. W. LINCOLN AVE N . H A R B O R B L V D N . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . L O A R A S T W. ROMNEYA DR W.LINCOLNAVE W. LINCOLN AVE 555 North Euclid Street DEV No. 2020-00083 Subject Property APN: 072-211-45072-211-22 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2019 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY DRIVE-THRU STARBUCKS (CUP2020-06068) DEV2020-00083 Development Standard CG Zone Standards Proposed Project Land Use 2,500 sq. ft. Drive-thru Starbucks restaurant building 300 sq. ft. outdoor dining area Site Area N/A Planning Info 0.71 ac/34,292 sq. ft. Building Height 75’ except 20’ S/B for 1 story (20’) from R zone 51’ S/B for 2 story (28’) from R zone (RS-2, west of Fairhaven) 23’-4” Landscape Setbacks 15’ from Arterial 10’ abutting residential w/trees 20’OC 0’ abutting non-residential 15’-0” to East (Euclid St.) 15’ to North (Crescent Ave.) 10’ to West (Fairhaven St.) 4’-8” to South (Apartments) 0’ to South (parking lot) Structural Setbacks 15’ from Arterial 20’ from Any Residential Boundary 0’ from Any Non-Residential Interior 37’-5” to East (Euclid St.) 28’-10” to North (Crescent Ave.) 92’-9” to West (Fairhaven St.) 94’-8” to South (Apartments/parking lot) FAR 0.50 0.08 (2,500 sq. ft.) Parking Restaurant - General +/- 20 seats 5.5/1000 >20 seats 10/1000 2,500 sq. ft. + 300 sq. ft. patio 2,800 sq. ft. @ 10/1000 28 spaces required 32 spaces (includes 2 disabled stalls, 2 EV stalls) +11 in queuing lane+1 loading space ATTACHMENT NO. 1 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2020-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06068 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2020-00083) (555 NORTH EUCLID STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06068 to permit the construction of a coffee shop with a drive-through lane (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project") on that certain real property located at 555 North Euclid Street in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.79 acres in size and is currently vacant (formerly occupied with a bank building). The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Mixed Use land uses; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act-related provisions of Executive Order N- 25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeing to observe and to address the local legislative body; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 the Planning Commission did hold a teleconferencing public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 26, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06068 and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission also finds and determines that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, - 2 - PC2020-*** Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new small structures or facilities. In urbanized areas, this exemption applies to commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet. The proposed project is a 2,500 square foot coffee shop that would include a drive-through lane, a take- out window, and a 300 square foot outdoor patio area; and, therefore, this exemption is applicable. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06068, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The Proposed Project is an allowable use within the "C-G" Commercial Zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030.010 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone; 2. The Proposed Project will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the Proposed Project has been designed to be compatible with surrounding commercial and residential uses, all traffic flows will be provided from an arterial highway, the one story building will be in scale with the surrounding uses, and a landscape buffer will be provided around the drive-through lane; 3. The size and shape of the site for the Proposed Project is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety because the Proposed Project has been designed to comply with all Code requirements including building height, floor area ratio, landscape and structural setbacks, parking and landscaping; 4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site is consistent with typical commercial businesses that would be permitted as a matter of right within the C-G (General Commercial) zone; and 5. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly - 3 - PC2020-*** declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06068, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06068 is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06068 constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 26, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a resolution of the City Council in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2020-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on October 26, 2020, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 26th day of October, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2020-*** - 6 - PC2020-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06068 (DEV2020-00083) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 1 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 2 The final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted for review and approval to Public Works Development Services Division and comply with the most current requirements of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant Redevelopment projects, identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 3 Prepare and submit a final drainage study, including supporting Q10, Q25, and Q100 hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. No offsite run-off shall be blocked during and after grading operations or perimeter wall construction. The Final Drainage Report shall demonstrate that the overall site post-development storm event run-off shall be less than or equal to the overall site existing pre-development storm event run-off for each watershed and that the proposed building structures and basement(s), if any, shall be flood protected. Finish floor elevations shall be 1-ft. minimum above the 100-year, 24 hour event water surface elevation. The Study shall be based upon and reference the latest edition of the Orange County Hydrology Manual and the applicable City of Anaheim Master Plan of Drainage for the project area. All drainage sub-area boundaries per the Master Plan for Drainage shall be maintained. Run-off shall not be diverted and any proposed improvements shall prevent downstream properties from becoming flooded. The Final Drainage report shall address the drainage velocity on the new on-site Public Works Department, Development Services Division - 7 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT improvements and potential impacts to the existing drainage system. Also, the plans shall show that all concentrated flow shall be contained within an approved drainage device and preserve the existing flows and manner drainage is conveyed downstream. Any inlets in sump condition shall be designed to capture Q25 and a secondary emergency outlet for the sump condition is required to provide a minimum of 1-ft. freeboard between the maximum water surface elevation and minimum finish floor elevation. The emergency outlet must direct overflows to either an adequate downstream street or natural conveyance system. 4 Submit a detailed Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 5 All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 6 The existing maintenance covenant shall be amended and approved by the City Attorney’s Office. The covenant shall include provisions for maintenance of new/modified private facilities and private utilities, including compliance with the project’s approved Water Quality Management Plan and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance responsibilities shall include parkway landscaping and irrigation, private utilities, private drives, WQMP BMPs, etc. The covenant shall be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 7 A Cross-Lot Drainage Agreement is required to be executed, approved by the City and recorded by the applicant on the properties for cross-lot drainage if one does not exist already. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 8 All conflicting utilities must be relocated in accordance with the utilities’ Owners’ requirements at the developers’ expense and all necessary permits must be secured prior to any utility relocation. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 9 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division - 8 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 10 The applicant shall provide Planning Department staff with a status update on the available parking supply for all uses within the block during the construction phase of the Starbucks project and off-site street improvements. This includes confirming adequate parking for the office building, bank building, and apartment complex will be provided as referenced in the Phased Parking Analysis submitted with this application. Should any deviation/shortfall to the Parking Analysis occur, restrictions on leasable commercial space in the office tower may be required until such time adequate parking is provided. Planning Department, Planning Services Division PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 11 The developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees required under the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 12 The existing utility easement through the site and in conflict with proposed improvements, shall be quitclaimed and a new easement recorded. Recorded easement documents shall be provided prior to building permit issuance. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 13 The existing emergency access easement shall be adjusted where in conflict with proposed improvements. Easement shall be coordinated with Anaheim Fire Department. Recorded easement documents shall be provided prior to building permit issuance. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 14 Provide a Pad Certification from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 15 The developer shall submit street improvement plans, obtain a right of way construction permit, and post a security (Performance, Labor & Materials Bonds, Storm Drain Maintenance) in an amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney for the construction of all required off-site and public improvements within the City street right of way of Fairhaven Street, Crescent Avenue and Euclid Street. Improvements shall conform to City of Anaheim Public Works requirements, approved WQMP, latest adopted City Standard 160-A, approved traffic study requirements, and as approved by the City Engineer. The street improvement plans shall include all traffic related improvements adjacent to the project site. These plans will show both sides of all streets adjacent to the property, including all driveways, utility installations, traffic signal modifications, signing and striping, and all other required offsite work. The entire street shall be repaved Public Works Department, Development Services Division - 9 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT from edge of new gutter to street centerline due to the number of utility cuts for the utilities that will serve this development and due to the deteriorated condition of the street. 16 Developer shall be responsible for any required utility relocations to accommodate the street widening and any utility relocation shall be in conformance with the pertinent Public Utility requirements, standards, and permits. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 17 All Landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881). Public Works Department, Development Services Division 18 Parkway landscaping, curb adjacent is required. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 19 Coordination, as necessary, with the neighboring properties will be required during the street widening work. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 20 The legal property owner shall voluntarily irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim, for road, public utilities and other public purposes, the right-of-way easements 9-feet along Crescent Avenue. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 21 The project driveway on Crescent Ave shall be restricted to right-turn in/out only. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted showing R1-1 (STOP) sign, R3-5(R) (RIGHT-TURN-ONLY) sign, STOP pavement legend, and right-turn arrow pavement legend for northbound approach at Project driveway/Crescent Ave intersection. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 22 Fire lanes shall be posted with “No Parking Any Time.” Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 23 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division - 10 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 24 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 25 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 26 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 27 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 28 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 29 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 30 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division - 11 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 31 Individual water service and/or fire line connections will be required for each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit per Rule 18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 32 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): • 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power poles, street lights, and trees. • 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 33 All required on-site Water Quality Management Plan, sewer, storm drain, public right of way, and street improvements shall be completed, operational, and are subject to review and approval by the Construction Services Inspector. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 34 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 35 Record Drawing Plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Public Works, Development Services Division. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 36 The developer shall improve Euclid Street, Crescent Avenue and Fairhaven Street in compliance with City Standard Detail 160-A, approved Traffic Study, and as required and approved by the City Engineer. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 37 That curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red to prohibit parallel parking in the drive aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled on building plans. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 38 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division - 12 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 39 Building shall be equipped with a comprehensive security alarm system (silent or audible) for the following coverage areas: • Perimeter of building and access route protection. • High valued storage areas. Police Department 40 A Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, shall be filed and returned to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department front counter. Police Department 41 Closed circuit television (CCTV) security camera are recommended, with the following coverage areas: • Lobby Entrances, interior and exterior • Dining Areas • Building perimeter • Parking lot • Drive-thru • Cashier’s areas • Manager’s Offices covering safes If security cameras are not monitored, signs indicating so should be placed at each camera. CCTV monitors and recorders should be secured in a separate locked compartment to prevent theft of, or tampering with, the recording. CCTV recordings should be kept for a minimum of 30 days before being deleted or recorded over. If used, CCTV videotapes should not be recorded over more than 10 items per tape. Police Department 42 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Number should be illuminated during hours of darkness. Police Department 43 Rooftop address numbers shall be provided for the police helicopter. Minimum size 4’ in height and 2’ in width. The lines of the numbers are to be a minimum of 6” thick. Numbers should be spaced 12” to 18” apart. Numbers should be painted or constructed in a contrasting color to the roofing material. Numbers should face the street to which the structure is addressed. Numbers are not to be visible from ground level. Police Department 44 All exterior doors shall have adequate security hardware, such as deadbolt locks. Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing device should be installed in solid doors where natural surveillance is compromised. The locks shall be so constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside doorknob/lever/turn piece. Police Department 45 Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and Police Department - 13 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT under vulnerable windows. Trees should not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult. 46 Signage shall be provided, stating, “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the entrances of parking lots and located in other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’ x 1’ in overall size, with white background and black 2 inch lettering. Police Department 47 All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C., to assist in removal of vehicles at the property owners/managers request. Police Department OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 48 Vehicle deliveries including loading and unloading shall be performed onsite. Delivery vehicles shall not block any part of the public right-of-way. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 49 Should the vehicle queue reach Crescent Avenue or Euclid Street, staff members shall be positioned at or shall position directional signage/directional cones at the end of the on-site queue near the entrances to direct traffic. This measure shall be implemented for a short timeframe, as needed, until the queue dissipates. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 50 Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during hours of darkness. Police Department 51 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-site. Minimum recommended lighting level in parking lots is .5 foot-candle maintained, measured at the parking surface, with a maximum to minimum ratio no greater than 15:1. Police Department 52 All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. Police Department 53 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division - 14 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 54 The facility shall operate in accordance with the Letter of Operation submitted as part of the application. Any changes to the facility’s operation described in the Letter of Operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Building Director to determine substantial conformance with said letter and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. This includes the designation of Mobile Order Pick-Up (MOP) parking spaces in the parking lot. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 55 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning Department, Planning Services Division GENERAL CONDITIONS 56 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to building permits, grading permits, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, and fire and life safety plans, etc. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 57 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 58 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 15 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 59 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division EUCLID STREET CR E S C E N T A V E N U E LOADING PL ( N 8 9 ° 0 6 ' 0 3 " W 1 5 5 . 3 ' ' ) (W 4 4 ° 2 2 ' 1 7 " W 3 4 . 8 3 3 3 ' ' ) 139. 4792' 45 . 0 5 ' N8 9 ° 3 7 ' 1 2 " W - 9 8 . 5 ' 5.01' N8 9 ° 3 8 ' 1 6 " W - 1 4 8 . 9 2 ' 184. 23' N. FAIRHAVEN ST. 7'X 5 0 ' S . V . T . 7'X 5 0 ' S . V . T . 7'X50' S.V.T.7'X50' S.V.T. 25'X25' S.V.T. T T E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E W W W W W W W W W W W W LANDCADD 1987 2" G LANDCADD 1987 LANDCADD 1987 LANDCADD 1987 LANDCADD 1987 LANDCADD 1987 LANDCADD 1987 LANDCADD 1987 LANDCADD 1987LANDCADD 1987 LANDCADD 1987 12 " G 2" G 3"G 2"G 3"G[ 12 " G 2"G2"G LANDCADD 1987 3,988 SF NO P A R K I N G FUT U R E CLE A N A I R / VA N P O O L / E V PROPOSED USE: COFFEE SHOP ZONING: G-C GENERAL COMMERCIAL BUILDING HEIGHT: 23'-6" EXISTING CHASE BANK COFFEE SHOP 2,500 SF 9 4 5 11 2 1 ZONING: G-C USE: GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING: G-C USE: GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING: RS-2 USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Sheet Name MA R K RE V I S I O N DA T E Sheet Number Project Number Seal KGL18003 76 East Mitchell Drive Phoenix, AZ 85012 (602)457-5757 CU P S I T E P L A N S U B M I T T A L 3/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 0 CU P S I T E P L A N 2 N D S U B M I T T A L 6/ 0 3 / 2 0 2 0 CU P S I T E P L A N 3 R D S U B M I T T A L 7/ 3 1 / 2 0 2 0 CU P S I T E P L A N 4 T H S U B M I T T A L 9/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 0 SP-1 SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SITE PLAN SP-1 1 PROJECT SITE - - ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CONCRETE CURB AT DRIVE-THRU AISLE DRIVE-THRU WINDOWLANDSCAPE CANOPY 29'-6"34'-6" 64'-0" 16 ' - 6 " 16 ' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 41 ' - 6 " 64'-0" 37 ' - 0 " 4' - 6 " 41 ' - 6 " LANDSCAPE MENU BOARD & ORDER POINT PRE-MENU BOARD S.E.S. GAS METER 7' - 6 " 2' - 9 " CANOPY CANOPY CANOPY 7' - 6 " BIKE RACK ENTRY ENTRY SERVICE DOOR 3' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 2' - 9 " 16 ' - 6 " 18'-9"2'-9"16'-6"2'-9"23'-3" CANOPY 2 FLOOR PLAN 1 FLOOR PLAN (GREY SHELL) Sheet Name MA R K RE V I S I O N DA T E Sheet Number Project Number Seal KGL18003 76 East Mitchell Drive Phoenix, AZ 85012 (602)457-5757 CU P S I T E P L A N S U B M I T T A L 3/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 0 C D AAE AACE ABE A C D B AC BA A C A A B B A CA C EEEA EEE A A BA B B A C A B T.O. WALL 6'-0" 8"X8"X16" CMU BLOCK W/ CEMENT PLASTER FINISH TO MATCH BUILDING STEEL POST STEEL RAFTER - DARK GRAY GATE LATCH T.O. WALL 6'-0" B.O. RAFTER 8'-0"STEEL POST - DARK GRAY STEEL FRAME - DARK GRAY STEEL ANGLE AROUND GATE FRAME - DARK GRAY 1 12" 18 GA. GALV. METAL DECKING - DARK GRAY B.O. RAFTER 8'-0" METAL DECKING, WELD TO RAFTERS - DARK GRAY 6' - 0 " MAINTAIN 3" CLR. FROM BTM OF GATE AND FIN. FLOOR. 34"Ø CANE BOLT 4" MIN. EMBEDMENT METAL DECKING, WELD TO RAFTERS - DARK GRAY 8"X8"X16" CMU BLOCK W/ CEMENT PLASTER FINISH TO MATCH BUILDING 9'-4" 16 ' - 0 " TRASH BIN METAL DECK ROOF ABOVE A A TRASH BIN STEEL FRAME - DARK GRAY MAINTAIN 3" CLR. FROM BTM OF GATE AND FIN. FLOOR. 6"5'-6"2'-0" 6" THK. CONCRETE APRON 10 ' - 0 " 3'-0" WD. MAN GATE 4" RAISED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3'-0" WD. MAN GATE 12" = 1'-0" SLOPE MIN. LINE OF 4" RAISED CONCRETE SIDEWALK BEYOND 34"Ø CANE BOLT 4" MIN. EMBEDMENT D AA A C EEAABABBA A C B B A A A B A EEE CC A A A C CAC C E BA A B A A B 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS & EXTERIOR 3 NORTH ELEVATION 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 4 WEST ELEVATION 2 EAST ELEVATION A B C D Sheet Name MA R K RE V I S I O N DA T E Sheet Number Project Number Seal KGL18003 76 East Mitchell Drive Phoenix, AZ 85012 (602)457-5757 CU P S I T E P L A N S U B M I T T A L 3/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 0 CU P S I T E P L A N 2 N D S U B M I T T A L 6/ 0 3 / 2 0 2 0 5 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATIONPLAN E Anaheim Place Partners, L.P. Spectrum Development Group 4 Venture, Suite 110 Irvine, CA 92618 April 11, 2020 Mr. Wayne Carvalho Contract Planner City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Re: Drive Thru Coffee Shop 555 N. Euclid Letter of Request Dear Mr. Carvalho Anaheim Place Partners, L.P. provides this letter to request consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction and operation of a drive thru coffee shop at 555 N. Euclid. The subject site was formerly occupied by an 11,000 square-foot bank building which has since been demolished. Chase Bank occupied that bank building and then relocated to a new building in our property located to the south of the subject site. Completion of this project will complete a major redevelopment of the overall site bounded by Fairhaven, Euclid, Crescent, and Westmont. We believe this exciting new development will provide a new neighborhood amenity and bring high quality development to a vacant site. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this matter. Warm Regards, Joe Haupt Spectrum Development Group on behalf of Anaheim Place Partners, L.P. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUING STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED DRIVE-THROUGH STARBUCKS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM Prepared for: Spectrum Development Group Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 765 The City Drive, Suite 200 Orange, California 92868 June, 2020 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUING STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED DRIVE-THROUGH STARBUCKS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................ 1 DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUING ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... 3 Queuing Data Collection and Observations .............................................................................. 3 Projected Queue Requirements for the Proposed Project ........................................................ 5 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1 – Project Site Plan .......................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 – Summary of Drive-Through Queuing Data Collection .................................................... 4 Drive-Through Queuing Study - 1 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. SWC Euclid St and Crescent Ave, Anaheim June, 2020 DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUING STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED DRIVE-THROUGH STARBUCKS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared to evaluate the drive-through queuing needs for a proposed drive-through Starbucks on the southwest corner of the intersection of Euclid Street and Crescent Avenue in the City of Anaheim. The City has requested that a queuing study be conducted to determine the adequacy of drive-through facilities for the proposed project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located the southwest corner of the intersection of Euclid Street and Crescent Avenue. There is an existing Chase Bank building on the project site that will be relocated to a new building within the same property. The applicant proposes to construct a 2,500-square-foot drive-through Starbucks in place of the existing building to be relocated. The project site would have an on-site parking supply of 30 parking spaces. A copy of the project site plan is provided on Figure 1. The project site currently has two driveways: one right-in-right-out only driveway along Euclid street, located approximately 100 feet south of Crescent Avenue; and one full-movement driveway along Crescent Avenue, located approximately 95 feet west of Euclid Street. The project plan proposes to reuse these two driveways. The opening to the drive-through lane would be located at the southwest corner of the building. The drive-through lane would wrap around the south, east, and north sides of the building, and would be approximately 230 feet long from the opening of the drive-through lane to the pick-up window, providing queuing for 10 to 12 vehicles, assuming 20 to 24 feet per vehicle. If needed, additional queuing for an additional 1 to 2 vehicles directly outside the drive-through lane could be accommodated through the parking areas on site, without disrupting parking or site circulation. Drive-Through Queuing Study - 3 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. SWC Euclid St and Crescent Ave, Anaheim June, 2020 DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUING ANALYSIS Queuing Data Collection and Observations City staff has requested an analysis of the adequacy of the Starbucks drive-through lane queuing capacity. Due to the COVID-19 “Stay-at-Home” Order, new queuing data was not collected, as the data would be skewed and would not reflect typical drive-through conditions. With concurrence from City staff, however, historic data collected at similar Starbucks locations from previous queuing studies within the past five years were used for this analysis. Kimley-Horn collected existing queuing data at five comparable Starbucks drive-through locations in Los Angeles County and Orange County. Drive-through observations and counts were conducted at the following Starbucks sites: -Northeast corner of Puente Avenue and Francisquito Avenue, Covina -Southwest corner of Citrus Avenue and Rowland Street, Covina -Southeast corner of Rosecrans Avenue and Normandie Avenue, Gardena -Southwest corner of Tustin Avenue and Chapman Avenue, Orange -Northeast corner of Goldenwest Street and McFadden Avenue, Westminster Additional Starbucks queuing data, collected in September 2019, was derived from an approved study in the City of Anaheim. This approved study included existing queuing data from a drive- through Starbucks location at the southeast corner of State College Boulevard and Placentia Avenue. These sites were selected for queuing data collection because of the site characteristics that are similar to the proposed project, e.g.: ·A Starbucks store with a drive-through lane; ·Located in Southern California; ·Located at or near the intersection of a primary (four lanes or more) arterial; ·Located within one mile of a freeway interchange. The drive-through activity at the five data collection sites was observed on a typical weekday, from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM, during the peak demand period. The drive-through activity at the additional data collection site in Anaheim was observed on a typical weekday, from 6:40 AM to 7:35 AM, during the peak demand period. The results of the observations are summarized on Table 1. The data summary on this table presents the observed average queue, peak queue, and the 85th percentile queue for the observed morning peak periods. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUING DATA COLLECTION Average All Sites Site Average 7:00-7:15 AM 6.5 5.6 7.6 n/a n/a 7.7 6.8 7:15-7:30 AM 6.7 7.8 8.8 10.8 9.3 5.3 8.1 7:30-7:45 AM 7.6 7.1 7.3 10.0 12.0 n/a 8.8 7:45-8:00 AM 8.4 6.1 8.1 11.2 7.2 n/a 8.2 8:00-8:15 AM 8.2 7.8 7.6 13.3 11.5 n/a 9.7 8:15-8:30 AM 8.0 7.2 7.0 12.6 11.0 n/a 9.2 8:30–8:45 AM 8.8 8.9 n/a 14.1 12.2 n/a 11.0 8:45-9:00 AM 8.7 9.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.1 Site Peak 7:00-7:15 AM 7 10 n/a 16 10 11 10.8 7:15-7:30 AM 8 11 9 14 12 7 10.2 7:30-7:45 AM 10 9 10 10 12 8 9.8 7:45-8:00 AM 10 8 10 14 8 n/a 10.0 8:00-8:15 AM 12 10 11 15 13 n/a 12.2 8:15-8:30 AM 8 11 11 16 14 n/a 12.0 8:30–8:45 AM 9 11 n/a 15 13 n/a 12.0 8:45-9:00 AM 9 11 n/a 14 6 n/a 10.0 Site 85th %-ile 2 7:00-7:15 AM 8 8 n/a n/a n/a 10.4 8.8 7:15-7:30 AM 8 10 10 n/a 9.8 7 9.0 7:30-7:45 AM 9 8 9 10.45 12 n/a 9.7 7:45-8:00 AM 10 7 9.4 n/a 8.4 n/a 8.7 8:00-8:15 AM 10 9 10 n/a 12.4 n/a 10.4 8:15-8:30 AM 7 11 10 n/a 12.3 n/a 10.1 8:30–8:45 AM 8 10 n/a n/a 13 n/a 10.3 8:45-9:00 AM 8 11 n/a n/a n/a n/a 9.5 1 Source:Queuing and parking study for proposed Starbucks at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Magnolia in the City of Anaheim (Albert Grover and Associates, 2020) 2 85th percentile = The queue will be less than the queue shown 85% of the time. Summary of Starbucks Drive-Thru Queuing Data Queue Summary Covina (Puente) Covina (Citrus)Gardena Orange Westminster Anaheim1 Drive-Through Queuing Study SWC Euclid St and Crescent Ave, Anaheim - 4 -Kimley-Horn and Asociates, Inc. June, 2020 Drive-Through Queuing Study - 5 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. SWC Euclid St and Crescent Ave, Anaheim June, 2020 The peak activity at each site was observed to occur intermittently, with an ebb and flow pattern throughout the morning peak, with periods of lower queuing activity between the peaks. The following vehicle movement and queuing observations of the operations at the study locations were made: ·The peak queues and occasional spillovers outside the drive-through lane opening were observed to ebb and flow, to last briefly, and to clear quickly (within 30 to 60 seconds). ·Some customers were observed to pull into the site; evaluate the wait time, based on the vehicle queue; and choose to park and go into the building, rather join the existing queue. ·Vehicles arriving from different site entrances come together on-site at the drive- through area, and then merge into the queue, taking turns in the same manner in which vehicles merge from two lanes to one. ·In almost all cases during the peak times, the queue vehicles filled the drive-through lane, with no gap between the order board and the pick-up window, thus fully using the capacity of the drive-through lane. The order process is typically shorter than the pick- up and pay process, so the area between the order board and the pick-up window is typically fully occupied by the queue. ·The Starbucks standard is to process a vehicle from the order board through the pick-up window in 45 seconds. On occasion, a more-than-average delay at the order board was observed to occur (i.e., due to a large order, or indecisiveness on the part of the customer) and would briefly hold up the movement of the queue, sometimes causing the remainder of the queue to extend beyond the drive-through lane opening. When the vehicle at the order board finished the order and pulled forward, the remaining cars in the queue would once again move through the order and pick-up process at the normal pace, and the gap between the order board and the pick-up window would fill in. Projected Queue Requirements for the Proposed Project Assuming the proposed Starbucks would experience similar queuing activity as the studied sites, the typical peak number of queued vehicles is estimated to be 10 to 12 during the morning peak period, with brief periods of spillover beyond the drive-through opening, for an observed peak of up to 12 vehicles; and less than this throughout the remainder of the day. However, it should be noted that this peak of 12 vehicles was observed intermittently between 8:00 AM and 8:45 AM. The peak 85th percentile, which is estimated to be 10.4 vehicles, would occur more frequently than the site peak and is within the sufficient queuing capacity of the proposed project. Drive-Through Queuing Study - 6 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. SWC Euclid St and Crescent Ave, Anaheim June, 2020 The proposed project’s drive-through lane would have enough stacking distance for 12 vehicles, and room for another 1 to 2 vehicles directly outside the drive-through lane in the parking areas, depending on the direction of approach and entry to the site. During the peak queuing times, the vehicle queue may extend beyond the drive-through lane itself and into the parking area surrounding the building for a short period of time. Vehicles queued along the south and west sides of the building could temporarily block access to a portion of the row of parking in those areas. Employees should be instructed to park in these parking spaces nearest the drive-through opening, leaving the remainder of the site parking readily available for customers. CONCLUSIONS ·The project site is located the southwest corner of the intersection of Euclid Street and Crescent Avenue in the City of Anaheim. The project parcel is currently developed with an existing Chase Bank building that will be relocated to the south within the same property. ·The applicant proposes to construct a 2,500-square-foot drive-through Starbucks in place of the existing building to be relocated. ·The project site would have an on-site parking supply of 30 parking spaces. ·The proposed drive-through queuing lane would be approximately 230 feet in length – enough distance for 10 to 12 vehicles to queue. ·Drive-through queuing data collection and analysis shows that the typical peak queue expected at the project site would be 10 to 12 vehicles, with brief periods of spillover beyond the drive-through opening for an observed peak of up to 12 vehicles. However, it should be noted that this peak of 12 vehicles was observed intermittently between 8:00 AM and 8:45 AM. ·The peak 85th percentile, which is estimated to be 10.4 vehicles, would occur more frequently than the site peak and is within the sufficient queuing capacity of the proposed project. ·Additional on-site queuing would accommodate an additional 1 to 2 vehicles directly outside the drive-through lane could be accommodated through the parking areas on site, without disrupting parking or site circulation. Project Site Project Site: Looking Southwest from Intersection of Euclid/Crescent ATTACHMENT NO. 6 Project Site: Looking Northwest from Euclid Street Project Site: Looking South from Crescent Avenue Project Site: Looking East from Fairhaven Street ATTACHMENT NO. 7 Parking Summary Tabulation by Phase Revised 6/9/2020 505, 545, 555 N Euclid, Anaheim Phase 1 PRESENT New Bank Open/Old Bank Closed/ROW Work Not Complete/Auxiliary Lot Not Complete Parking Required Use Notes/Permit Number # of Stalls 505 N. Euclid Full Occupancy 215 505 N. Euclid (Occupancy Limitation)Occupancy Limit per 6/27/2018 Letter, 13,329 Sq. Ft. Vacant (41) 545 N. Euclid - New Chase Bank Open on TCO BLD2018-01507 16 555 N. Euclid - Old Chase Bank Demolished per BLD2019-05032 0 Total Parking Required 190 Parking Provided Parcel 1 (505 N. Euclid)125 Parcel 2 (545 N. Euclid) 18 Parcel 4 (555 N. Euclid) 69 Total Parking Provided 212 Variance of Parking Required vs Provided - Surplus/(Shortfall)22 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 Phase 2 June 2020- Sept 2020 New Bank Open/Old Bank Closed/ROW In Progress & Aux Lot In Progress Parking Required Use Notes/Permit Number # of Stalls 505 N. Euclid Full Occupancy 215 505 N. Euclid (Occupancy Limitation)Occupancy Limit per 6/27/2018 Letter, 13,329 Sq. Ft. Vacant (41) 545 N. Euclid - aka New Chase Bank Open on TCO BLD2018-01507 16 555 N. Euclid - Old Chase Bank Demolished per BLD2019-05032 0 Total Parking Required 190 Parking Provided Parcel 1 (505 N. Euclid)125 Parcel 2 (545 N. Euclid) 18 Parcel 4 (555 N. Euclid) 69 Parcel 4 (555 N. Euclid) Stall Loss Due To RCP2019-16372 (28) Total Parking Provided 184 Variance of Parking Required vs Provided - Surplus/(Shortfall)(6) Phase 3 Oct 2020-Jan 2021 Auxiliary Lot Complete - Reduce Office Building Vacancy Restriction Parking Required Use Notes/Permit Number # of Stalls 505 N. Euclid Full Occupancy 215 505 N. Euclid (Occupancy Limitation)Occupancy Limit per 6/27/2018 Letter, 13,329 Sq. Ft. Vacant (41) 545 N. Euclid - aka New Chase Bank Open on TCO BLD2018-01507 16 555 N. Euclid - Old Chase Bank Demolished per BLD2019-05032 0 Total Parking Required 190 Parking Provided Parcel 1 (505 N. Euclid)125 Parcel 2 (545 N. Euclid) 18 Parcel 4 (555 N. Euclid) 69 Parcel 4 (555 N. Euclid) Stall Loss Due To RCP2019-16372 (28) Auxiliary Mariposa Parking Lot GRA2016-03175/RCP2017-12927 91 Total Parking Provided 275 Variance of Parking Required vs Provided - Surplus/(Shortfall)85 Phase 4 Jan 2021-May 2021 Coffee Shop Under Construction Parking Required Use Notes/Permit Number # of Stalls 505 N. Euclid Full Occupancy 215 505 N. Euclid (Occupancy Limitation)Occupancy Limit per 6/27/2018 Letter, 13,329 Sq. Ft. Vacant (41) 545 N. Euclid - aka New Chase Bank Open on TCO BLD2018-01507 16 555 N. Euclid - Old Chase Bank Demolished per BLD2019-05032 0 Total Parking Required 190 Parking Provided Parcel 1 (505 N. Euclid)125 Parcel 1 (Stall Loss)Due to new Xformer (1) Parcel 2 (545 N. Euclid) 18 Parcel 4 (555 N. Euclid) 69 Auxiliary Mariposa Parking Lot GRA2016-03175/RCP2017-12927 91 Parcel 4 (555 N. Euclid)Temporary Loss due to Coffee Shop Construction (69) Total Parking Provided 233 Variance of Parking Required vs Provided - Surplus/(Shortfall)43 FINAL All Uses Complete Parking Required Use Notes/Permit Number # of Stalls 505 N. Euclid Full Occupancy 215 545 N. Euclid - aka New Chase Bank Open on TCO BLD2018-01507 16 555 N. Euclid - New Coffee Shop DEV2020-00083 28 Total Parking Required 259 Parking Provided Parcel 1 (505 N. Euclid)Includes Perm Loss of 1 Stall d/t Xformer 124 Parcel 2 (545 N. Euclid) 18 Parcel 4 (555 N. Euclid) 33 Auxiliary Mariposa Parking Lot GRA2016-03175/RCP2017-12927 91 Total Parking Provided 266 Variance of Parking Required vs Provided - Surplus/(Shortfall)7 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: OCTOBER 26, 2020 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650B VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957B LOCATION: 1952 West La Palma Avenue (Servite High School) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Cynthia DeVito representing the property owner, Servite High School. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of an amendment to a previously-approved Conditional Use Permit to modify the orientation of an existing baseball field at Servite High School, and an amendment to a previously-approved Variance to construct 50-foot high fencing, supported by 50 to 60-foot high poles, in the Transition zone which allows a maximum fence height of eight feet. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), and approving an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650B and Variance No. 2013-04957B. BACKGROUND: The subject 15.32-acre property is developed with the Servite High School campus and includes four single family residences on Keystone Street which were approved for demolition to provide for construction of an aquatics center in 2014 (as discussed further below). The zoning for the property is “T” (Transition) for the main campus and “RS-2” (Single Family Residential) for four residential properties along Keystone Street. The General Plan designates the school property for School land uses and the four residential properties for Residential Low Density land uses. The campus is surrounded by single family homes on all four sides. PRIOR ZONING ENTITLEMENTS: The following zoning entitlements have been approved for the high school campus: • Conditional Use Permit No. 922: to permit the expansion of an existing private high school was approved by the Planning Commission in 1967. • Conditional Use Permit No. 3880: to permit a school expansion for a maximum of 850 students with less parking than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (Code) was approved by the Planning Commission in 1996. This permit was amended in 2002 to permit the construction of a new employee parking lot. • Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05104: to permit three additional modular classroom buildings was approved by the Planning Commission in 2007. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650B AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957B October 26, 2020 Page 2 of 6 • Conditional Use Permit 2012-05650 and Variance 2013-04957: to permit the reorientation of the existing baseball field, construct a new team room, storage room, concession stand, bleachers and a 30- foot high fence along the right and left field edges, which are the subject of amendment in this entitlement request, was approved by the Planning Commission in 2014. Conditional Use Permit 2012-05650 and Variance 2013-04957 also permitted the demolition of four single family homes and construction/operation of an aquatics center which was subsequently amended in 2016 to allow for a lesser side setback than required by Code. PROPOSAL: The existing baseball field is located in the southwest corner of the property, highlighted in green on the site plan. The baseball diamond is located in the southeast corner of the field, with the baseball mound facing a southeast direction. The applicant proposes to amend the previously-approved CUP, which permitted reorientation of the baseball field, to retain the baseball field it its existing orientation and location. Upon further consideration, plans to reorient the baseball field, and related site plan revisions have been abandoned. The applicant proposes to erect 50-foot high netting surrounding the existing baseball field. The netting would start behind the left-field foul line, wrap around home plate, and continue behind the entire right-field foul line. The netting would be supported by a total of seven poles ranging from 50 feet to 60 feet in height. Two 60-foot high load poles would be erected behind home base, located 21 feet from the property line abutting single family homes to the south. Three 50-foot high net poles and one 55-foot high load pole would support the netting behind the right-field foul line, adjacent to the track and field to the east. One 55-foot load pole would support netting along the left-field foul line located approximately 40 feet from single family homes to the south. Site Plan CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650B AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957B October 26, 2020 Page 3 of 6 The baseball field is typically used from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., June through January, to accommodate practices and general physical education. During the baseball season, from February through April, the field may be used between 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays. No changes to the hours of operation for the baseball field are proposed. The netting would remain in place all year long to protect students and staff utilizing the track and field to the east, as well as the surrounding homes to the south. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve an amendment to a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; General Simulation CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650B AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957B October 26, 2020 Page 4 of 6 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Code requires approval of an amendment to the conditional use permit if a substantial modification to the previously-approved project and/or changes to the approved conditions of approval is proposed. The purpose of the conditional use permit amendment is to ensure that the proposed changes would be compatible with the surrounding uses. The proposed amendment to retain the baseball field in its existing orientation would not have adverse impact on the adjoining land uses since the baseball field orientation is an existing permitted condition. The existing baseball field is accessory to the existing school, and there are no changes proposed to the existing buildings or vehicular access points. No additional traffic would be generated. Staff recommends approval of applicant’s request to amend the conditional use permit. Variance: The Planning Commission may grant the requested variance amendment upon a finding that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; 2) That, because of special circumstances shown above, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. According the applicant, Servite High School has been responsible for mitigating property damage and personal safety issues relating to baseball activities. The existing-30 foot high chain link fence does not adequately provide sufficient protection to surrounding single family residential properties from damage related to foul balls. Damage to automobiles, windows and roofs have been prevalent. Personal safety is also a motivating factor to increase the height of the existing fence. The safety of students, visitors and faculty utilizing the adjacent track field is also at risk due to the field’s close proximity to the existing baseball field. To address these personal safety issues, Servite High School restricts baseball practices from occurring simultaneously with track and field events; however, off-setting hours is time consuming and an inefficient use of the facility. The applicant hired a netting company with experience in netting projects at professional baseball stadiums. Based on their professional experience, the fencing company designed netting to prevent injuries to the students and faculty, and to prevent property damage for the neighbors adjacent to the baseball field. The existing 30-foot high chain link fence and score board are currently visible to surrounding properties, and the proposed higher netting and poles would create a larger visible area. Due to its orientation on the north side of the residential properties, the netting would not block light or cast a shadow on adjacent residential properties. In addition, the netting is designed to allow light to permeate through so as to minimize shadowing over the baseball field. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650B AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957B October 26, 2020 Page 5 of 6 Photo Simulation Looking North from Catalpa Avenue The proposed 50 to 60-foot high baseball field fencing and supporting load poles are taller than the eight foot fence height permitted by Code in the Transition Zone. The request to increase the height beyond eight feet is to ensure the protection of individuals and property from stray foul balls hit during games and practices. Staff believes that the findings exist for the granting of the requested fence height variance due to the unique circumstance created by the school’s location amid a residential neighborhood. Allowing taller safety screening would reduce the physical impacts of a baseball diamond on adjacent properties and ensure the safety of students and staff. Due to this unique circumstance, staff recommends approval of the fence variance request. Neighborhood Outreach: The applicant mailed out letters to nine neighbors located on Catalpa Avenue (the neighbors adjacent to the baseball field), informing the residents of the fencing being proposed around the baseball field. The letter provided an overview of the project and included a site plan and a photo simulation. No concerns over the potential visual impact of the fencing was expressed, and one neighbor expressed a concern regarding the efficiency of the proposed netting and indicated that the fencing may not be tall enough to achieve 100% effectiveness. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within the Class 3 (New Construction) Categorical Exemption. Class 3 consists of the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures, including fences. The proposed project is a request for approval of a variance to permit the construction of 50 to 60-foot high netting around the Servite High School baseball field. As such, the proposed project meets the criteria for a Class 3 categorical exemption. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650B AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957B October 26, 2020 Page 6 of 6 CONCLUSION: The proposed development is consistent with the goals and policies of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code. Servite High School is an asset to the community. Supporting academic and sports programs through the proposed baseball field design to minimize impacts on the surrounding neighborhood is a benefit. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and variance amendment requests. Prepared by, Submitted by, Sophia Tatlyan Niki Wetzel, AICP Assistant Planner Deputy Planning and Building Director Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Site Plan 3. Fence Plan 4. Variance Justification 5. Simulations and Site Photographs TDEV 2020-00169(CUP 3745)SERVITEHIGH SCHOOL TPRESCHOOL RM-4LA HACIENDAAPTS9 DU RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SFR RM-3ANAHEIM SHORES CONDOS137 DU RM-2ATTACHED CONDOS64 DU W LA PALMA AVE W CATALPA AVE N F A I R V I E W S T N W I C H I T A S T N C H I P P E W A A V E N K E Y S T O N E S T W DOGWOOD AVE W DOGWOOD AVE W. LA PALMA AVE N . E U C L I D S T N . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . L O A R A S T W. ROMNEYA DR 1952 West La Palma Avenue DEV No. 2020-00169 Subject Property APN: 072-131-12 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2019 W LA PALMA AVE W CATALPA AVE N F A I R V I E W S T N W I C H I T A S T N C H I P P E W A A V E N K E Y S T O N E S T W DOGWOOD AVE W DOGWOOD AVE W FALMOUTH AVE W. LA PALMA AVE N . E U C L I D S T N . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . L O A R A S T W. ROMNEYA DR 1952 West La Palma Avenue DEV No. 2020-00169 Subject Property APN: 072-131-12 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2019 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2020-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650 AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2020-00169) (1952 WEST LA PALMA AVENUE) WHEREAS, on March 9, 1967, and subject to certain conditions of approval, the Anaheim Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "Planning Commission"), by its Resolution No. PC67-42, did approve Conditional Use Permit No. 922 to permit the expansion of an existing private school on that certain real property located at 1952 West La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim, generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on September 8, 1988, the Anaheim Zoning Administrator, by its Resolution No. ZA88-53, approved Variance No. 3833 to permit an existing patio cover with waiver of minimum structural setback; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 1996, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC96-30, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3824 to permit a baseball storage room at an existing private high school; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 1996, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC96-119, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3880 to permit a new 2-story classroom addition and remodel an existing classroom building in conjunction with an existing private school with waivers of maximum structural height and minimum number of parking spaces. On September 23, 2002, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2002-142, approved an amendment to this permit to construct a new parking lot on two adjoining single family residential zoned lots; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 1999, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC99-181, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 4154 to permit a freestanding electronic readerboard sign in conjunction with an existing private high school; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2006, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2006-60, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05104 to permit two modular classroom buildings in conjunction with the existing private high school. On August 20, 2007, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2007-101, approved an amendment to this permit to permit an additional modular classroom building; and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2014, and subject to certain conditions of approval, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2014-018, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05104 and Variance No. 2013-04957 (the "Original Project") to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements and to expand the existing Servite High School campus to include the demolition of four single family - 2 - PC2020-*** homes, construction of a new aquatics center and parking lot, reorientation of the existing baseball field with 30-foot high fencing and 10-foot high block walls, relocation of the music and weight room buildings, replacement lighting for the track and football field, and consolidation of the five parcels along Keystone Street into the main school campus property and Variance No. 2013-04957 to permit a reduced front yard setback along Keystone Street, fencing that is higher than permitted by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the “Code”), and less parking than required by the Code at the subject Property. The conditions of approval which were the subject of the Original Project shall be referred to herein as the "Previous Conditions of Approval"; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016 the Planning Commission by its Resolution, approved an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 and Variance No. 2013-04957, designated as "Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A" and “Variance No. 2013-04957A”, to modify plans for a proposed aquatic center on four residential lots on the west side of the (along Keystone Street) Servite High School campus with a side yard setback less than permitted by the Code at the subject Property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified petition to approve an amendment to the Original Project, designated as “Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-2650B” and “Variance No. 2013-04957B” to retain the existing baseball field orientation on the Servite High School campus and to construct 50-foot high fencing, supported by 50 to 60-foot high poles, where the Transition zone allows a maximum fence height of 8 feet; (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 15.3 acres in size and is developed with the Servite High School campus. The zoning for the high school campus is “T” Transition for the main campus and “RS-2” Single Family Residential for the aquatic center along Keystone Street. The General Plan designates the school property for School and Low Density Residential land uses. As such, the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapters 18.04 (Single Family Residential Zone) and 18.14 (Public and Special Purpose Zones) of the Code; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act-related provisions of Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeing to observe and to address the local legislative body; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 the Planning Commission did hold a teleconferencing public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 26, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650B, Variance No. 2013-04957B and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred - 3 - PC2020-*** to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 3 – New Construction or Conversion of small structures) which consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-2650B, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit the proposed Project is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under subsection .010 of Sections 18.04.030 and 18.14.030 (Educational Institutions–General) of the Code. 2. The proposed Project will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the Proposed Project has been designed to be compatible with surrounding residential uses and conditions of approval have been included herein to reduce or eliminate and potential adverse impacts. 3. The size and shape of the site for the proposed Project is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety because the site can accommodate the parking, traffic, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties. 4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the vehicular circulation is designed to minimize impacts on the surrounding properties. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650B under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Variance No. 2013-04957B, does find and determine that the required findings for approval of a variance to allow the 50-foot high fence supported by 50 to 60-foot high poles can be made because: SECTION NO.18.46.110.020.030 Permitted Wall and Fence Height. (8 feet required, 50-60 feet proposed) - 4 - PC2020-*** 1) There are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity because unique circumstances apply to the property due to the unique circumstance created by the school’s location amid a residential neighborhood. 2) That, because of the special circumstances identified above, strict application of the Zoning Code would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Allowing a taller screening structure will reduce the physical impacts of a baseball diamond on adjacent properties and increase the safety of students and staff. WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-2650B and Variance No. 2013-04957B contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which these entitlements are applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or - 5 - PC2020-*** findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 26, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on October 26, 2020, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 26rd day of October, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2020-*** - 7 - PC2020-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650B AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957B (DEV2020-000169) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 1 The owner shall submit detailed lighting plans demonstrating light levels (horizontal and vertical) along adjacent residential property lines. Light levels that exceed 2.0 footcandles at any portion of a residential property line shall trigger the following offers: • Servite High School shall provide an offer to fund blinds, shutters or other means acceptable to the homeowners to block spillover light from entering ballfield-facing windows. This offer shall be made to the homeowners 60 days prior to and payment made at least 30 days prior to the first lighting of the field. A homeowner’s refusal to accept payment shall not be considered Servite’s failure to accomplish this mitigation requirement. Any written documentation pertaining to this mitigation measure shall be provided to the Planning Department. • The mitigation payment shall not exceed $2,000 per impacted residences. • This mitigation applies to the following addresses, or as revised pursuant to the final lighting plans: 930, 924, 920, 914 and 910 N. Keystone and 1939 W. Catalpa Avenue. • After initial completion, each luminaire and shields affixed on the pole shall be situated and adjusted so that lighting levels on residential property lines are minimized and are compliance with the final detailed lighting plans submitted to the City. After the appropriate burn-in time for the lights, Servite High School shall take measurements to confirm these levels have been achieved and submit same to the Planning Department. MM Aesthetics 1 Planning Department 2 Servite High School shall program evening use of the aquatic center and baseball field so that lights are turned off by 7:00 p.m. and 9:30 p.m., respectively, consistent with the Event Management Plan. Planning Department 3 Any necessary address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Numbers should be visible during hours of darkness. Police Department 4 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be Police Department - 8 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678 5 The rear doors of the premises shall be numbered with the same address numbers or suite number of the business. Minimum height of 4 inches is recommended. Police Department 6 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. Police Department 7 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 8 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Di vision of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 9 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use if necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 10 Trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Said storage areas shall be designed, located and screened so as not to be readily identifiable from adjacent streets or highways. The walls of the storage areas shall be protected from graffiti opportunities by the use of plant materials such as minimum 1-gallon size clinging vines planted on maximum 3-foot centers or tall shrubbery. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. Public Works-Streets and Sanitation Division GENERAL CONDITIONS 11 The maximum school enrollment shall not exceed 950 students. Planning Department - 9 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 12 The school shall be operated in accordance with the two parking studies, prepared by the IBI Group and The Planning Center, and the Parking Management Plan, prepared by the applicant, that were submitted as part of this application. Any changes to these plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with these documents to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning Department 13 Access to the aquatic complex and sports fields shall be from the interior campus only. Planning Department 14 Adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. Police Department 15 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 16 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 17 All new and/or existing landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning Department 18 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department 19 The Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning Department - 10 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 20 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department FH FH FH FHFH FH KB KB F I R E L A N E EX I S T I N G BL D G EX I S T I N G B L DG EX I S T I N G B L DG EX I S T I N G BL DG EX I S T I N G B L DG EX I S T I N G BL DG EX I S T I N G C O VE R E D AR E A 30 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 1 0 7 / 8 " 84 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 4 ' - 4 3 / 8 " 2 5 0 ' - 0 " 2 5 2 ' - 0 1 / 4 " PA R K I N G AR E A B - 5 5 S P A C E S 2 S T O R Y EX IS T I N G CR B L D G 18 ' - 8 " 1 2 1 ' - 0 " 3 0 ' - 0 " 3 2 8 ' - 0 " 50 ' - 0 " F E N C E 12 ' - 0 " F E N C E S T A R T S HE R E 16 ' - 0 " F E N C E S T A R T S HE R E 20 ' - 0 " F E N C E S T A R T S HE R E 6' - 0 " H . C . L . F E N C I N G ON L Y 6' - 0 " H . C . L . F E N C I N G WI T H 6 ' H I G H C M U O N NE I G H B O R P R O P E R T Y SI D E S T A R T S H E R E 8' - 0 " H . C . L . F E N C I N G DU G O U T BU L L P E N 1 8 8 ' - 0 " PU L L B A C K P O L E LO A D P O L E S LO A D P O L E LO A D P O L E PU L L B A C K P NE T T I N G P O L E 30 0 ' - 5 1 / 8 " 4 1 ' - 2 5 / 8 " 2 1 ' - 0 " 5 6 ' - 0 " CONTROL JOINT, SEE DETAIL 2B/SP-11EXPANSION JOINT, SEE DETAIL 2A & 2C/SP-11 TOP OF CLEAN-OUT, SEE DETAIL 3/SP-11CJEJTOP OF SLOT DRAIN, SEE DETAIL 3/SP-11 TSD TCO SURGE CHAMBER ACCESS COVER, SEE DETAIL 5/SP-6 S C AHOSE BIBB, SEE DETAIL 7/SP-10 HBACCESSIBLE LIFT, SEE DETAIL 2/SP-8 AL C OLD WATER CWSLOPE DIRECTION TO DRAINSL .WATER LEVEL W LTOP OF DECK TD T OP OF FINISH FLOOR TF FINVERT ELEVATION I .E.POINT OF CONNECTION P.O.C.STORM DRAIN S DTRENCH DRAIN, SEE DETAILTR CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE LANDSCAPE PERMANENT ASPHALT PAVING PAINTED WARNING STRIPES ON ASPHALT PAVING FIRE LANE, PAINTED RED CURB ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PAINTED P N TGALVANIZEDGVPERMEABLE CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE DECOMPOSED GRANITE - DG PAVERS TYPE I APPROX. SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINEP1P2P3P4P5- I P5- II P A V E R S T Y P E I I P6 P7 FIRE HYDRANT F HFENCE STATION MARK A#AREA DRAIN, SEE CIVIL SHEETS AD C ATCH BASIN, SEE CIVIL SHEETS CB K NOX BOX K B AREAS VAN PROVIDED MIN. REQ.SPACESTABLE 11B-208.2 PARKING SPACES CALCULATION 1 0 2 50 212227 2 NOTE:344 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PER MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND INITIAL STUDY FOR: SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL.363 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED.DATE:ISSUESHEET TITLEPROJECTAny reproduction or distribution for any prupose other than authorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensions shall have precedence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of any variations from the dimensions and conditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group for approval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHKD' BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:SHEET NUMBERPRIME CONSULTANTSUB CONSULTANTSEALCLIENTCOPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:ISSUES A 1 BCDE 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6ABCDEibigroup.com1952 West La Palma Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 SUB CONSULTANTS:IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110 Irvine CA 92612 tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 As indicated CAMPUS SITE PLAN126668EW07/22/14 A1001SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL TM/OW1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim,CA 92801SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL A1 0 0 1 Sc a l e : 1 " = 4 0 ' - 0 " 1 00 - S i t e _ P l a n NSITE LEGEND AP P R O X . S C O P E P F W O R K NO.ISSUANCE STATUS DATE ASK REVISIONS 75 ' - 0 " PU L L B A C K P O L E LO A D P O L E ATTACHMENT NO. 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 A A B B C C D D 5075 Flightline Drive Kingman, AZ 86401 This structural system and details are proprietary and the exclusive product of WEST COAST Netting, Inc. No part of these drawings shall be reproduced, copied or used without the knowledge and written consent of WEST COAST NETTING, INC. Office (928) 692-1144 Fax (928) 692-1501 Toll Free: (800) 854-5741 www.westcoastnetting.com MARK DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE: SHEET TITLE: DATE: SCALE: SIZE: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO.: DRAWING NO.: SHEET: 3/24/2020 Detail Servite High School 1 / 60 D ECR 2 OF 2 22'-0" 38'-0" 35'-0" 20'-0" 19'-6"17'-0" P2'-6"P2'-6" 60'-0" 55'-0" 20" .5" Wall Steel Pipe 18" .375" Wall Steel Pipe 20" .5" Wall Steel Pipe 24" .5" Wall Steel Pipe Pullback Pole X 2ea.Load Pole X 2ea. 188'-0" 121'-0" 75'-0" 30'-0" Pullback Pole, 60' Pullback Pole, 60' Load Pole, 55' Load Pole, 55' Dugout D u g o u t Netting 50' High X 480' Layout SCALE 1 / 300 Wall Detail NOT TO SCALE 5'-0" OC Hilti EyeboltCable 140'-0" 14'-6" Netting Pole X 3ea. B u l l p e n Batting Cage Netting Pole, 50' 25'-0" 25'-0" 50'-0" 16'-0" 20'-6"18'-0" 18" .5" Wall Steel Pipe 14" .375" Wall Steel Pipe P2'-6" ATTACHMENT NO. 3 1952 W. LA PALMA AVE, ANAHEIM, CA 92801 | SERVITEHS.ORG | 714-774-7575 | INFO@SERVITEHS.ORG July 24, 2020 City of Anaheim Planning Department Re: Permit # BLD2020-02577 To Whom It May Concern, We are in the midst of applying for a permit (permit # referenced above) that would allow Servite High School to erect a netting system around our baseball field facility. We recently were told by the Planning Department that changes needed to be made that would decrease the height of the original netting design from 50 feet to 30 feet which, in effect, would negate the reasons for this project. Background Over the years, Servite High School has had problems with mitigating property damage and personal safety issues relating to baseball related activities. The existing chain-link fencing, which stood approximately 30 feet and extended from 1st base around to 3rd base, did very little to protect neighborhood property (i.e. automobiles, windows, roofs) from foul balls and virtually nothing to insure personal safety for those inhabiting the adjacent track and main field facilities to the East. There are many foul balls and line drives that find their way on to the track and main field that become inherently deadly because of the speed at which the baseballs travel or the height from which they fall. We consider it to be so dangerous that we do not allow main field or track activities at the same time as baseball games nor do we allow baseball batting practice when the main field or track is in use. Having to manage our facility in this way is extremely tedious and time-consuming not to mention inefficient. With this netting project, it is the school’s intent to mitigate all of the issues mentioned above and to do so with a solution that is effective and not cost prohibitive. Solution We were introduced to a company named West Coast Netting (WCN) who has done major league professional baseball stadium netting projects and has practical industry knowledge. They were made aware of the problems I outlined above and our motivations to get them corrected. After much discussion, they came back with a design that they believe would mitigate a substantial amount of risk involved with our current baseball field layout. Their suggestion was a 50-foot netting rig as outlined in the design that was in fact approved by the Engineering Department. As the experts in this industry, I whole-heartedly accept WCN’s recommendation as being valid and necessary and believe this is what we need to reduce our risk to the lowest level possible. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Summary Our previous fence height was 30 feet and prove to be ineffective for the most part. We spend anywhere from $3,000 to $5,000 per year to repair neighborhood property and we have had a few personal injuries related to baseball related foul balls. Truth be told, we have been lucky in the personal injury area but as we all know, it only takes one-time and we will have a tragedy. Given the above, I am respectfully requesting that you approve the 50-foot high netting design so that we can actually realize the benefits of safety and reduced liability that this layout has to offer. Original 30-feet is conditioned under Resolution No PC2014-018. Section 18.46.110.030 states maximum fence height from 6feet permitted; now 8to 30 feet high. Respectfully submitted, James M. Welch CPA ‘79 Vice President of Finance & Operations (NEW) FH WE I G H T P A V I L I O N PE RM I T # B L D 2 0 1 5 - 0 4 1 1 8 MO D U L A R C L A S S R O O M B L D G PE RM I T # B L D 2 0 1 5 - 0 5 4 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DATE:ISSUESHEET TITLEPROJECTAny reproduction or distribution for any prupose other than authorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensions shall have precedence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of any variations from the dimensions and conditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group for approval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHKD' BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:SHEET NUMBERPRIME CONSULTANTSUB CONSULTANTSEALCLIENTCOPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:ISSUES A 1 BCDE 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6ABCDEibigroup.com1952 West La Palma Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 SUB CONSULTANTS:IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110 Irvine CA 92612 tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 1" = 50'-0"ON SITE PHOTO S126668EW09/08/20 A1010SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL TM/OW1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim,CA 92801SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 A1 0 1 0 Sc a l e : 1 " = 5 0 ' - 0 " 1 00 - O n S i t e P h o t o M a p NO.ISSUANCE STATUS DATEATTACHMENT NO. 5 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11121314151617DATE:ISSUESHEET TITLEPROJECTAny reproduction or distribution for any prupose ot her than authorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensions shall have preced ence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of any vari ations from the dimensions and conditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings sha ll be submitted to IBI Group for approval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHKD' BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:SHEET NUMBERPRIME CONSULTANTSUB CONSULTANTSEALCLIENTCOPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:ISSUES A 1 BCDE 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6ABCDEibigroup.com1952 West La Palma Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 SUB CONSULTANTS:IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110 Irvine CA 92612 tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 1" = 50'-0"OFF SITE PHOTO S126668EW09/09/20 A1011SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL OW/TM1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim,CA 92801SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL A1 0 1 1 Sc a l e : 1 " = 5 0 ' - 0 " 1 00 - O f f S i t e P h o t o M a p 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NO. ISSUANCE STATUS DATE DATE:ISSUESHEET TITLEPROJECTAny reproduction or distribution for any prupose ot her than authorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensions shall have preced ence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of any vari ations from the dimensions and conditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings sha ll be submitted to IBI Group for approval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHKD' BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:SHEET NUMBERPRIME CONSULTANTSUB CONSULTANTSEALCLIENTCOPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:ISSUES A 1 BCDE 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6ABCDEibigroup.com1952 West La Palma Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 SUB CONSULTANTS:IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110 Irvine CA 92612 tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 3D CAMPUS 1 2 6668 EW 09/09/20 A1012SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL OW/TM1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim,CA 92801SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL NO. ISSUANCE STATUS DATE 1 1 1 2 2 A E RI A L 2 1 AE R I A L 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: OCTOBER 26, 2020 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06069 LOCATION: 1440 South Anaheim Boulevard APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Michael Lederer. The property owner is Lederer-Anaheim LTD. REQUEST: To consider an appeal of the Planning Director’s approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP) to permit paid and unpaid parking spaces within the existing parking lot of the Anaheim Indoor Marketplace. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and uphold the Planning Director’s approval of Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06069. BACKGROUND: The 14-acre site is developed with a 136,525 square foot retail shopping center named the Anaheim Indoor Marketplace (AIM) which has been operating since 1990. The property is designated by the General Plan as General Commercial and is within the “C-G” General Commercial Zone. The property is surrounded by industrial properties to the north and east, the former American Sports Center and industrial uses to the south across Cerritos Avenue, and retail uses and a mobile home park to the west across Anaheim Boulevard. The AIM is occupied with general retail, dining, automotive retail sales, automotive servicing, an indoor entertainment area including a taping studio and stage for concerts, an indoor and outdoor recreational facility with arcade recreational devices, and a recreational hockey rink and soccer field. The site contains approximately 1,170 parking spaces. Access to the site consists of two driveways, approximately thirty five feet wide, along Anaheim Boulevard and one 35-foot wide driveway along Cerritos Avenue. PROPOSAL: The applicant requests to designate 624 parking spaces of the existing 1,170 parking spaces for nonpaid and paid parking as overflow from neighboring businesses and future residents in the Avanti condominium project across Anaheim Boulevard (currently under construction). The AMC requires 546 parking spaces and 1,170 parking spaces are provided, resulting in a surplus of 624 parking spaces. The applicant is not proposing to designate a certain area of the parking lot for paid parking only; however, signs would be posted and a parking attendant would be on premises CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06069 October 26, 2020 Page 2 of 4 during the hours of operation to would direct patrons to either the non paid or paid parking spaces depending on the business of the driver. A parking fee would not be collected for patrons visiting the AIM, including customers who are attending special events, but a parking fee would be collected for persons who are conducting business offsite or residents who live nearby. APPEAL: The proposed MCUP was evaluated by staff and duly noticed to property owners and tenants within a 500 foot radius of the property. At the completion of the review process, the Planning Director’s designee made the findings to approve the MCUP and issued an administrative approval letter on July 6, 2020. Staff subsequently received a letter of appeal from a community member on July 14, 2020, which fell within the 10 day appeal period. The appeal stated that if 624 parking spaces were intended for both nonpaid and paid parking, then the remaining 546 parking spaces would not be sufficient for the administrative staff, vendors and customers of the AIM. The letter of appeal identified that interior areas of the AIM had been modified and that the existing uses, such as the soccer field, banquet facility, and retail car dealer, require a higher parking demand. The letter further states that the American Sports Center, the medical center, and construction crews who are working on a neighboring hotel project have been using the AIM parking lot for overflow parking and that AIM management has been charging parking fees without a permit. In addition, the appellant also expressed concerns regarding the driveways and fire lanes being blocked and that various special events are being held throughout the year, such as carnivals, festivals, and fairs, which takeaway a certain number of parking spaces that were intended to be used for AIM vendors and customers. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06069 October 26, 2020 Page 3 of 4 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Before the Planning Commission may approve an appeal of a minor conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The property has a Zoning Classification of “C-G” General Commercial, and the Anaheim Municipal Code (Code) permits the establishment of an “Automotive-Public Parking” lot through the processing of a MCUP. The property is developed with a 136,525 square foot retail shopping center which has multiple commercial uses consisting of retail, dining, recreational, and automotive sales and service, all of which were entitled under separate Conditional Use Permits or were permitted by right. The parking for each use was calculated separately through individual use permits in the past, but the Code currently requires a parking ratio of 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for a “Large Commercial Center.” The Code requires 546 parking spaces and the AIM has 1,170 onsite parking spaces, resulting in a surplus of 624 spaces. Per the operational plan provided by the applicant, the parking spaces would not be marked specifically for either paid or unpaid parking; rather, there would be parking attendants onsite who would direct the driver to a specific parking space based on the intended business of that driver. The site also contains different uses which may operate at different hours of the day which would reduce the chance that the parking lot would be filled to capacity at any one point of time. As long as the applicant adequately manages the operation of the AIM parking lot, staff does not believe that there would be any parking-related impacts pertaining to access or circulation throughout the site or any impacts to the neighboring community. The Code Enforcement Division received a complaint from a community member pertaining to renting parking spaces without the appropriate permits. Through the processing of this request, the current violation pertaining to renting parking spaces would be resolved pending the outcome of this MCUP request. Prior to this current violation, City records indicate that no parking-related complaints were received by Code Enforcement staff. Approval of a Special Event Permit is required for occasional onsite events including, but not limited to, carnivals, circuses, or holiday season events. During the review of the Special Event Permit, the number of parking spaces required to accommodate temporary structures and parking for event patrons would be evaluated to determine whether the AIM would have adequate parking during the event, and proposed circulation routes would also be evaluated to ensure that circulation CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06069 October 26, 2020 Page 4 of 4 throughout the site would not be impacted. To ensure that occasional onsite events would not adversely impact parking for AIM vendors and customers, staff has included the following conditions of approval in the draft resolution: A minimum of 546 parking spaces shall be provided for Anaheim Indoor Marketplace employees, vendors, and customers at all times. Any surplus parking spaces (i.e., above 546 parking spaces) may be used for paid or unpaid parking for surrounding businesses and residents. The property owner shall obtain a Special Event Permit (SEP) for any temporary outdoor event proposed on the property. The SEP application shall specify the number of onsite parking spaces being occupied by the event (for both temporary structures and event patrons), the number of surplus spaces available for surrounding businesses and residents, and the number of parking spaces remaining for the employees, vendors, and AIM customers (which shall not be less than 546 spaces). Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities). Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The proposed Project is to designate 624 of the 1,170 existing parking spaces as both paid and nonpaid parking at the AIM. The Project scope will not result in the removal or addition of parking spaces nor will the site be altered. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the request to permit both paid and unpaid parking spaces for businesses and residents surrounding the AIM property would not result in an impact on either the parking supply or circulation on the site. Based on the stated justification, staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Planning Director’s approval of Minor Conditional Use Permit 2020-06069. Prepared by, Submitted by, Peter Lange Niki Wetzel, AICP Contract Planner Deputy Planning and Building Director Attachments: 1. Draft CUP Resolution 2. Site Plan 3. Project Description 4. Letter of Appeal 5. Site Photos C-G (SABC)DEV 2020-00087ANAHEIM MARKETPLACEINDOOR SWAP MEET C-G (SABC)OFFICES I (SABC)INDUSTRIAL I (SABC)RETAIL I (SABC)OFFICES RM-3.5 (SABC)ANAHEIM BUSINESS PARK I (SABC)INDUSTRIAL I (SABC)INDUSTRIAL I (SABC)RELIGIOUS USE I (SABC)RELIGIOUS USE I (SABC) INDUSTRIAL I (SABC) INDUSTRIAL I (SABC) INDUSTRIAL I (SABC)INDUSTRIAL C-G (SABC)RESTAURANT I (SABC) INDUSTRIAL I (SABC) INDUSTRIAL T (SABC)RETAIL T (MHP)GOLDEN SKIESMOBILE HOME PARK C-G (SABC)AUTO DEALERSHIP S A N A H E I M B L V D E CERRITOS AVE E PALAIS RD W CERRITOS AVE E E. BALL RD S . L E W I S S T W. BALL RD E. KATELLA AVE S . A N A H E I M B L V D E. CERRITOS AVE S . H A R B O R B L V D W. KATELLA AVE E. GENE AUTRY WAY S . D I S N E Y L A N D D R S .S U N K I S T S T S . C L E M E N T I N E S T 1440 South Anaheim Boulevard DEV No. 2020-00087 Subject Property APN: 082-130-16 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2019 S A N A H E I M B L V D E CERRITOS AVE E PALAIS RD W CERRITOS AVE E E. BALL RD S . L E W I S S T W. BALL RD E. KATELLA AVE S . A N A H E I M B L V D E. CERRITOS AVE S . H A R B O R B L V D W. KATELLA AVE E. GENE AUTRY WAY S . D I S N E Y L A N D D R S .S U N K I S T S T S . C L E M E N T I N E S T 1440 South Anaheim Boulevard DEV No. 2020-00087 Subject Property APN: 082-130-16 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2019 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 -1- PC2020-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND ADOPTING MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06069 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2020-00087) (1440 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06069 to permit paid and unpaid parking spaces within the existing parking lot of the Anaheim Indoor Marketplace (AIM) (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project") on that certain real property located at 1440 South Anaheim Boulevard in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 14 acres in size and is currently developed with a 133,200 square foot commercial building for an indoor retail marketplace. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General Commercial land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Building Director’s designee approved the Project on July 6, 2020; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2020, a letter of appeal was submitted to the Planning Department expressing concerns pertaining to the amount of onsite parking and onsite circulation issues; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act-related provisions of Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeing to observe and to address the local legislative body; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 the Planning Commission did hold a teleconferencing public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 12, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06073 and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and -2- PC2020-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features. The project proposes to designate existing parking spaces as bath paid and nonpaid parking at the Anaheim Indoor Marketplace (AIM). The PropoProject will not result in the removal or addition of parking spaces nor will the site be altered and as such, the project will not cause a significant effect on the environment pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06069, does find and determine the following: 1. The Proposed Project is an allowable use within the "C-G" Commercial Zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030.010 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to approval of a minor conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone. 2. The Proposed Project complies with the provisions of the “C-G” General Commercial zone and Chapter 18.08.070 of the AMC and, under the conditions imposed would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is located because the number of parking spaces provided onsite would continue to support all of the commercial land uses of the commercial retail center. 3. The size and shape of the site for the Proposed Project is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety. 4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area in that the project scope does not involve any improvements which could increase traffic as the project would be to designate existing surplus parking spaces as both nonpaid and paid parking. The project would not result in any changes to the parking layout or footprint of the commercial building; therefore, no onsite parking or circulation impacts would impact the neighboring area. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim since the proposed use will not result in the removal or expansion of existing parking spaces. Therefore, the health and safety of the neighboring community will not be impacted by the Proposed Project. WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. -3- PC2020-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06069, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06069 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 26, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -4- PC2020-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on October 26, 2020, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 26h day of October, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -5- PC2020-*** EXHIBIT “A” DEV NO. 2020-00087 -6- PC2020-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06069 (DEV2020-00087) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT GENERAL CONDITIONS 1 Overnight parking may be allowed for a maximum of 72 hours to provide temporary overflow parking for the neighboring businesses and residents. The paid parking shall operate in accordance with the Letter of Operation submitted as part of the application. Any changes to the operation described in the Letter of Operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Building Director to determine substantial conformance with said letter and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning Services Division 2 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-site. Minimum recommended lighting level in parking lots is .5 foot-candle maintained, measured at the parking surface, with a maximum to minimum ratio no greater than 15:1. Planning Services Division 3 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Services Division 4 All new and/or existing landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning Services Division 5 A minimum of 546 parking spaces shall be provided for Anaheim Indoor Marketplace employees, vendors, and customers at all times. Any surplus parking spaces (i.e., above 546 parking spaces) may be used for paid or unpaid parking for surrounding businesses and residents. Planning Services Division -7- PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 6 The property owner shall obtain a Special Event Permit (SEP) for any temporary outdoor event proposed on the property. The SEP application shall specify the number of onsite parking spaces being occupied by the event (for both temporary structures and event patrons), the number of surplus spaces available for surrounding businesses and residents, and the number of parking spaces remaining for the employees, vendors, and AIM customers (which shall not be less than 546 spaces). Planning Services Division 7 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Services Division 8 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Services Division 9 The subject Property shall be developed, used and maintained substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Services Division, and as conditioned herein. Planning Services Division I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' I''I I'''' ss·�· I' 'I''I I''I I'' I''I ' '' I''I I '' I'' I''I I '''' '' I''I I'' I' ' f I''r-b ''I ' '' ' '· -, 14'10 5. ANAHEIM BL VV EXISTING RESTAURANT ZONE 11CL11 COMMERCIAL l l EXISTING PARKING LOT NO CHANGE 160'-0" ½ f 250•-o· P ROPE RIT Y P ,lo,lelilrf LIME CA51NET5i_ !54 STALLS SI STALLS !54 STALLS SI STALLS f-- t- SI STALLS SI STALLS t- t- 51 STALLS <I& STALLS f-- t- !50 STALLS ,4'I srALl,5 t- t- <l'I STAU.S '4'1 S1AIJ,S t- t- <l'I STAU.S <l'I STAU.,5 f-- f-- <l'I STALLS jl5 STALLS :l5 STAU.S :l5 STAU.S 29 s'rAl..l'.s :l5 STAU.S _, r------7I II I ) 25• 1. a I t;il 22:1·--1· _ _,-"\ , 21 STALLS _ ... _ _._ ... .__.__ � Q;/GAj< P�li5 --'--..... _ ..... _ _, __ ._ -... -V -- -- -- ------ ---�--1 ,r I,� ,-1 � ==-p� I le5' �'\� .•• --1111aEG ---l -----tei L----------------,,1=...., ....}S'._JJ: I i --' !I I I I ,i! •. I o,J-1 !I D 1: lo,Jo,,i I IL.,-,!l''f-, � � I � -IPJ-11 I"'!!! I I NN 'I �mRE 18 ,,.,., I!1PMTS ,--�.-----,-"""'" I' i""""' 5TOla: i 1 5fGlll!Ei ; .ii 11 ,_ -� I ..... (E/ SOCCER PLAY�II I I I I I .-----, ' 2 I r=,· I 50' ili...;r 4'/00GG<R.... �., I ,.,.,,.,.,./ ,--- w z � ( I � -I \, -4'1-�E .1 ili?'hl0' '½'. I ,_ � .. w.. <>.. PRO.E;T "( "'-l14 I� 1; ½ �lJ� � �I / / / .... ' • ''"" NORTH ENTRY ....... PROPERTY INFORMATION: 14 ,... �a..._�AP.N., 401-412-22 - -LEGAL DESCRIPTION, TRACT 2"122 LOT 61 EXISTING RETAIL BUILDING 199,200 SQ. FT FULLY SPRINKLERED ENTRY � 11 / � � ....,.,, / � I ., �g � li! � ' � 2e,•i�! ... !,---I - I Pi--H-H--Siq1-11• L! - -2e' H-I � 20's-' { Iii Hi6ifl -I GRQ55-1',,....-• BM. ', itu :z -------"-� 100'� --= I I I I I JI I l I ----j� �!}-i: "' I-I -' ¥l D! ... IR I I :w I I 10 I ' i D!' 'D.. � .1''' / 50lJ'Tl! re.r RESTROOMS r �t= I LN I 11 STALLS I< STAU.S 1q STAU.S lq STAU.S 20 STAU.S CERRITOS v� ENTRY •2 v .... v .... O□ AVENUE t=! -� I---.. ENTRY II� •s � �22 ST/ILLS 22 $T,OUS 22 pT"¥-5 22 ST/ILLS 22 ,STAl,LS '' !��1! !;i:j 1 l 11- ---,----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I I I \ 5 T E F 1- A N 1"=40'-0" !TABULATION:! AREAS: TOTAL EXISTING INDOOR BUILDING INDOOR RESTAURANT AND EATING AREA OUTDOOR EATING AREA NET AREAS: RETAIL 133,200-7,688 INDOOR & OUTDOOR RESTAURANT PARKING REQUIRED: 133,200 SQ. FT. 7,688 SQ. FT. 3,316 SQ. FT. = 125,521 SQ. FT. = 11,004 SQ. FT. = 502 STALLS = 44 STALLS 546 STALLS RETAIL: 125,521 / 1,000 x 4 RESTAURANT: 11,004/1,000 x 4 TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING PARKING PROVIDED: 1,170 STALLS BALL 1W � SITE CERRITOS ST. � VICINITY MAP REVISIONS DATE w () <( 0....I> a.....I LI)I- Ill ow ::E co� - SJ0:: w <( J: <(::E <( ()::E � �w ·w" J: Cl) J: 0:: <( O<( w z "'"z z <( "It <( 5 � WW c2 () <( <( 0....1>Cl a. --' LO z 1- I l l o-w '<:: coI-,� "" N<( .... - a, w 0:: w <( Cl) <( J: " ::E <( '-' 1-() w -, 0:: ::E z � 0 -<( -Ow ·w0 J: Cl) J: I-<( O<( :::J z "It z 0 <( � <( a. �,,,,� .,jj1•!�'E.O ARc.":--� .. .. ,,,,�,�,.,,,,,,,"4,�'7_1,-,;::-:;.. . ,�1• r".'. 8-........ ,-.�-:. ... .t'':l'' 0�€:""---;..�.,;;. fl "o<?' -x�.,,_ 1 � ,,,; -� ·� �...., ,:, -1 I,:: �(!) ,ol � !*i No. C 16997 �i*�. I� '%_ i � � � I ,:-" .,._ .,,-.. .,, � �:c-· Q .... �. ... � o,... �<,S).-:-1:.·· 09-30-'t,,�,,-l �'l' � <( z I w co w (9 0::: 0 w (9 1,, -:.-;,.t r;,,,,,,,,,,,,11,,1fCJl':'i,, 1'' �.::-•, .. ,,, OF' CA\.\ ,,,, 6� IO ,,,,,,,,,11,111111 ':,, \ lfir11our -.iE-1 ����WI <t (!)II-LL 'z f-w�0 ID W1-"t::>-W CX) ::'2:Ulllz!:::: M =iw....J<C :r:: � l:::�<C>-� I-0) C'\J (J)U�IT'<( 0 r,,... Z o:::(..') .,...-LO -<CQ'.'z� u ;:j;:1:0;;- � O QI-Wl'--r:: QJ -����UJ Q. CX)N - " : (I) I-1--c 0 ~ x-z -,r U...O)<( �QLLOrfLL I-Q<(LL @�0 1--=iz Io Eu □o_o I- _ Cl lL�Wo:::U) -W<( iU Ct:0oo;.2{!)-<J.)WW[Y :5 I Z I-coc_o_l-Z o::: Z (..') (J)Q VJ Cw �w O:::w�o_ I'\ ••(.')o_O::'.U ..., Ust_,,. =oz0 <( CO ·o >-�w cw "-'"' EZ-a:ic1-_,. w C\I <((/) o::t:: LL a. I I c....::::i o_a::: 0 C\J W :::'2:....J....J LL � <( LO I'-O�::ia::: ...... LO uw:r:: >-...... -U (/J LL-rn """ <Cw lfl1-� oIZ:::::J o_ •-z I-0 LL W ...__..-a:::u <Cw';;: X (IJ��Qw " � � z -ma:::o -W::::,<(W 3:u o__o__L_ -<( 5 LL Q;l �Ct'.OCl::::r:: wzo..0 w lfl<CI, Ct'. Ullflwa:::O..I, I lfl LL 2=2::::J3:� PROJECT NO: 110:302 CAD DWG FILE: G,I DRAWN BY: 6'B CHECKED BY: G,B DRAWING SCALE: 05-l"l-lB SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN SHEET SP 1 OF 2 EXCESS PARKING : 642 STALLS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 Anaheim Indoor Marketplace – Public Parking Lot Letter of Request BACKGROUND The Anaheim Indoor Marketplace (Marketplace), located at 1440 S. Anaheim Blvd, opened in 1990 and has grown to become Orange County’s largest indoor swap meet. The 136,525 sq. ft. facility is home to over 200 specialty shops ranging from electronics to jewelry. The Marketplace also offers restaurants, dance classes, arena soccer, and special events in a family-friendly environment. The commercial shopping center provides a surplus of parking with 1,170 parking spaces available to their tenants and customers. As a member of the Anaheim community, the property owner has offered the Marketplace parking lot for various City and charitable uses, including, but not limited to: 1.Parking for City of Anaheim street and intersection widening projects, including a request from the City to allow Turner Construction to utilize 400 of the excess available parking spaces for several months. 2.Staging for an Anaheim Police Department homeless outreach event. 3.Permitting the Orange County Transit Authority vehicles to park on the lot during wait times. 4.Permitting food banks to stage weekly food distribution to low-income families. Over the last few years, the property owner has seen an increase in use of the Marketplace parking lot by visitors of adjacent businesses and on-going events. As this unauthorized parking use has continued to grow, the property owner sought to ensure ample and easily accessible parking for his Marketplace tenants and patrons, while also recognizing an opportunity to provide a needed service to the adjacent businesses that have limited or inconveniently located parking. As such, the property owner began charging non-customers a fee to utilize the excess parking spaces. This allows the property owner to dictate the location of overflow parking, as well as monitor parking lot use to ensure his tenants and customers have available and convenient parking. Parking demand by non-Marketplace customers is expected to increase as the nearby residential and hotel projects near completion. Currently, construction workers for these projects park without authorization on the Marketplace parking lot. Existing Operations Marketplace Hours: Wednesday - Monday: Open 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Tuesday: Closed ATTACHMENT NO. 3 P a g e | 2 2400 E. Katella, Suite 800|Anaheim|CA|www.sagecrestplanning.com Security: The Marketplace has a modern surveillance system, which includes over 100 video cameras. In addition, six (6) security guards patrol the interior and exterior of the facility, including the parking lot. PROJECT REQUEST The property owner is requesting a conditional use permit to allow for the conversion of the excess parking available at his commercial shopping center for use as a public parking lot. The existing 136,525 sq. ft. commercial shopping center currently provides 1,170 parking spaces, while the Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) only requires 546 parking spaces for the mix of commercial uses located at the site, resulting in an excess of 624 parking spaces. Proposed Public Parking Lot Operations In order to manage the parking supply as a result of non-customers utilizing the Marketplace parking lot, and to offer what is clearly a much needed service to surrounding businesses and community, the applicant proposes to charge a fee for parking at the commercial shopping center. Patrons of the Marketplace will continue to park free of charge, but the 624 excess parking spaces will be made available to paid parking. This will provide much desired nearby parking for the various surrounding uses while allowing the property owner to ensure ample parking for his tenants and customers. The Marketplace anticipates that most parking patrons will utilize the lot for daytime parking only, such as visitors to the nearby sports center. However, overnight parking would be permitted for up to 72 hours. An overnight parking pass must be purchased in advance and posted on the vehicle’s dashboard. Vehicles parking overnight would need to vacate the premises by 10 AM the day their pass expires. For example, a vehicle that purchases a three-night pass would arrive on Friday and vacate the premises by 10 AM Monday. Signage will be posted to identify the areas available for public parking and a parking fee will be collected by an attendant. Security guards will patrol the parking lot. The parking revenue will allow the owner to offset the immense security expense already incurred by the need to place additional guards on the lot to protect the spaces from being occupied by unauthorized persons. PARKING ANALYSIS The AMC requires large commercial retail centers to provide 4 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area (AMC Chapter 18.42.040, Table 42-A). Restaurant uses within retails centers are also parked at four (4) parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area so long as 40% or less of the gross floor area is devoted to restaurant uses. In total, the Marketplace has 136,525 sq. ft. of gross floor area, which includes 133,200 sq. ft. of interior space. Restaurant uses range from grab-and-go snack vendors to sit-down restaurants and occupy 11,004 sq. ft. (or 8% of gross floor P a g e | 3 2400 E. Katella, Suite 800|Anaheim|CA|www.sagecrestplanning.com area) within the Marketplace, far less than the 40% threshold. Therefore, the ratio of four (4) parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. is applicable to the shopping center in determining the parking requirement. Using this metric, it was determined that the commercial shopping center requires 546 parking spaces and the commercial shopping center provides 1,170 parking spaces, resulting in an excess of 624 parking spaces. Type of Use Size Code Requirement Required Parking Retail Uses 125,521 sq. ft. 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area 502 parking spaces Restaurant Uses 11,004 sq. ft. (8% of GFA) 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. (less than 40% of gross floor area) 44 parking spaces Total Required 546 parking spaces Total Provided 1,170 parking spaces Total Excess 624 excess parking spaces ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Kitchen/Restaurant Ordering Area and Indoor Seating Additional Indoor Seating ATTACHMENT NO. 5 Typical Store Typical Store Outdoor Area (Tented and Gated) Outdoor Area (Facing Building) Soccer Fields (Adjacent to Patio) Parking Lot (Facing AIM) Parking Lot (Facing Adjacent Property to the West) Adjacent Property (Facing Northwest) Adjacent Property (Facing North) Adjacent Property (Facing East) Adjacent Property (Facing South) Adjacent Property (Facing South) Adjacent Property (Facing Southwest) Adjacent Property (Facing West) Adjacent Property (Facing West) Adjacent Property (Facing West) 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item.