Loading...
1978/05/0978-544 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May. 9~ 1978~ l:3p. P.~ PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour COUNCIL MEMBERS: None CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts FINANCE DIRECTOR: George Ferrone PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: Thornton Piersall PLANNING DIRECTOR: Ron Thompson CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddox ASSISTANT UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Ed Alario Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. INVOCATION: Reverend George Brown, Melodyland Hotline Center, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman William I. Kott led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 119: CINCO DE MAYO FIESTA JUNIOR AND SENIOR QUEENS: Miss Marisela Barrios and Miss Dora Lopez, Cinco de Mayo Junior and Senior Queens, respectively, were intro- duced to the Council and presented with flowers, Big "A" frames and proclamations congratulating them on their achievements. 119: PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Seymour and unanimously author~ed by the City Council: "Medical~Assistance Week in Anaheim" - ~y 15-21, 1978 "Poppy Days" - May ]9 and 20, 1978 American Legion "Poppy Days" May 19 and 20, 1978 VFW "Hire A Veteran Week" May 7-14, 1978 "Police Week in Anaheim" May 14-20, 1978 "Municipal Clerk's Week" May 14-20, 1978 MINUTES: Approval of minutes was deferred to the next regular meeting. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Roth moved to waive the reading, in full, of all ordinances and resolutions and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $4,726,183.70, in accordance with the 1977-78 Budget, were approved° 78-545 ~itv Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 197.~, 1:30 P.M. 123: FIRST AMENDMENT TO COOPERATION AGREEMENT NO. 3 WITH THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY: In accordance with recommendation submitted by the Executive Director indicating approval of an amendment is necessary to provide 1) that the Agency will advance funds for the public improvements to the City; 2) that the Agemcy, rather than the City, will acquire the necessary property; and 3) to allow for increased costs anticipated in construction of the improvements, Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 78R-278 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 78R-278: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A "FIRST AMENDMENT TO COOPERATION AND REIM- BURSEMENT AGREEMENT" WITH THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-278 duly passed and adopted. 123/161/155: COOPERATION AGREEMENT NO. 7 WITH THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 78R-279 for adoption authorizing execution of Cooperation Agreement No. 7 to design, construct and install certain public improvements described as follows: sewer and water lines to support realigned Lincoln Avenue, City Hall improvements and Senior Citizen housing project; widen- ing of Broadway from Anaheim Boulevard to Philadelphia; electrical improvements along Lincoln Avenue not previously covered by Cooperation Agreement NOo 5; traffic signal installation at Harbor Boulevard and Elm; improvements pursuant to agreement with Alan Clendenen at Cypress and Vine Streets. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 78R-279: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO BE OF BENEFIT TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ALPHA PROJECT AREA AND DETERMINING THAT NO OTHER REASONABLE MEANS OF FINANCING SUCH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE AVAILABLE TO THE COMMUNITY; CONSENTING TO THE PAYMENT BY THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY OF THE NET COST OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; CERTIFYING AS TO THE COMPLETION AND REVIEW OF T~ INITIAL STUDY AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT THEREFOR BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE AGENCY. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-279 duly passed and adopted. 160: VOLUNTARY COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROGRAM WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE: In accordance with recommendations submitted by the Purchasing Agent, Councilman Overholt offered Resolution No. 78R-280 for adoption authorizing the Purchasing Agent to contract with the County of Orange for participation in the cooperative purchasing program through June 30, 1983. Refer to Resolution Book. 78-5z~ 6 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, !.;30 P,M. RESOLUTION NO. 78R-280: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE VOLUNTARY COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROGRAM FOR POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL M~MBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-280 duly passed and adopted. !50: APPROPRIATION FROM TITLE III FOR IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: On motion by Councilman Kott, seconded by CouncilmEn Roth, the City Council appropriated the sum of $1,300 from Title III, Older Americans Act, to the Recreation Division, Senior Citizen Program Budget, Account No. 10-276-17, for the purpose of finalizing the building improvements at the Senior Citizens Center. MOTION CARRIED. 164: CERRITOS AVENUE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT (WORK ORDER ~O. 13-4309-735-16-0000): On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council authorized the substitution of Irvine Pipeline for Valentine Construction as subcontractor for the Griffith Company on the Cerritos Avenue storm drain improve- ment project located east of Lewis Street. MOTION CARRIED. 145: CONCURRENCE WITH COUNTY RESOLUTION REGARDING LAKEVIEW AVENUE: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 78R-281 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO 78R-281: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONCURRING IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE RESOLUTION DECLARING A PORTION OF LAKEVIEW AVENUE, A COUNTY HIGHWAY, DURING CONSTRUCTION OF SAID AVENUE PURSUANT TO SECTION 1700 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-281 duly passed and adopted. 173: LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY .(SOIL AND MATERIAL TESTINGS: In accordance with recommendation from the City Engineer, Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 78R-282 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO, 78R-282: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A LICENSE AGREE~iENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (North of Lincoln Avenue, east of South Atchison Street.) 78-5A7 C__it¥ Hall, ANaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P,M, Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-282 duly passed and adopted. 123/131: COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH CALTRANS FOR IMPROVEMENT AND SUBSEQUENT RELINQUISHMENT OF STATE ROUTE 72 .(ANAHEIM BOULEVARD): Report from the City Engineer recommending approval of the proposed District Agreement No. 3432 for reconstruction by the City and relinquishment by the State of Route 72, Anaheim Boulevard from Route 91 Freeway to Cerritos Avenue, including that portion of Harbor Boulevard between Anaheim Boulevard and the Route 91 Freeway, was submitted. The Mayor recognized Mrs. Diann Marsh, 321 North Philadelphia Street, Anaheim, who read a prepared statement setting forth the following reasons for opposition to this proposal: 1) that it would deprive Anaheim of revenue due to withdrawal of State maintenance funds; 2) that it would create a discontinuous highway; 3) that it would cause substantial impact on the surrounding area; 4) that further research regarding the effects of traffic, noise, air pollution, cultural resources is necessary; 5) because of concern that this is being done for the purpose of circumnavigating the State's A-95 review. Mrs. Marsh requested that the City Council include in their resolution a pledge to submit any changes in Anaheim Boulevard to the standard A-95 review and to withhold any demolition until this process is completed. Mr. Maddox responded to these comments that the proposal is primarily a relinquish- ment, and there is no change proposed to the physical character of the street at this time. This agreement w~l provide that the City put the street in a state of good repair, rather than the State, and the City will receive the sum of $380,000 to accomplish same. This amount, in his opinion, is more than sufficient to complete the necessary work. Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 78R-283 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO,, 78R-283: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH T~E STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE IMPROVEMENT OF STATE ROUTE 72 (ANAHEIM BOULEVARD) AND SUBSEQUENT RELINQUISHMENT THBREOF TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (District Agreement No. 3432) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIl MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-283 duly passed and adopted. 78-5~8 City ~all, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES M~. 9, 1978, 1:30 P,M, 175: RENEWAL OF LICENSE AGREEMENT - BARRE/VILLA PARK RIGHT-OF-WAY: In accordance with the recommendation submitted by the Utilities Director, Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 78R-284 for adoption authorizing renewal of the License Agreement with Southern California Edison Company for a 66 kV line for a period ending May 14, 1983, with an annual payment of $47. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 78R-284: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A RENEWAL OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR A 66 kV LINE WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (BARRE/VILLA PARK RIGHT-OF-WAY). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-284 duly passed and adopted. 106: SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR 1978-79 CITY AND FEDERAL GENERAL REVEN"~. SHARING BUDGETS: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the City Council adopted the schedule for public hearings on the proposed Federal General Revenue Sharing and 1978-79 City Budgets to be held June 13 and June ZO, 1978, respectively. MOTION CARRIED. 105: APPOINTMENT TO HOUSING COMMISSION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD: Notice was given to Council Members of one vacancy on the Housing Commission (Tenant Commissioner), term ending June 30, 1981, and one vacancy on the Community Services Board, term ending June 30, 1980. Councilwoman Kaywood stated that she felt it would be advisable for the entire City Council to meet with the potential appointees before making a decision, and thereupon moved that both of these matters be continued to the May 16, 1978 meeting to allow time for such meeting. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. Mayor Seymour voiced concern that the City Council not require citizens desiring appointment to a board or commission to "parade" themselves before the City Council at a Tuesday meeting. In response to Councilman Kott's inquiry as to the reason for the continuance, inas- much as he was prepared to nominate Mrs. Patricia Bayley for the Housing Commission vacancy this date, Councilwoman Kaywood indicated that she wished to have some additional time in which to contact the potential appointees and meet with them on an informal basis. Councilman Roth explained that he would also vote favorably for appointment of Mrs. Bayley this date and would second the nomination. He noted that if Council- woman Kaywood is seeking a full Council decision, he would not be available for the May 16, 1978 meeting. Vote was taken on the foregoing motion to continue. Councilman Kott voted "No". MOTION CARRIED. 78-549 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P,M~ Councilman Roth was requested by Mayor Seymour to submit his preference for the Charter Revision appointments, in writing, so that the Council might be aware of his preference next week when these appointments are considered. 175/153: REPORT ON TRAINING OF CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVES: Report on employee training in Customer Service was requested by Council at the April 25, 1978 Council meeting when a resolution to provide premium pay for employees temporarily upgraded to the position of New Business Representative was submitted. Mayor Seymour noted that he has reviewed the report submitted which does describe in some detail the current training policies of the Customer Service Division; however, his concern when this report was originally requested was the number of complaints he had received regarding an improper attitude on the part of some on-line people dealing with the public. While the report submitted does describe the current training program, Mayor Seymour stated he is still not satisfied that conditions are going to change because these t~aining procedures have been reduced to paper. He noted that he is still seeking a response as to how conditions will improve so that the customers of the Anaheim Utility are treated as well as they might be by a private utility company. Mr. Ed Alario advised that in the past eight months he was aware of only three complaints relating to a discourteous attitude. He assured Council that it is not the policy of the Utilities Department to treat customers in this manner, and this behavior will certainly not be tolerated. He requested that if any more cases are brought to Council's attention, that he be made aware of them so that he might take the appropriate action. He reminded Council that this situation often arises with people who are in a delinquent status with their bill and, consequently, the utilities have been turned off and they are, therefore, more likely to be very emotional. Mr. Alario explained that'they intend to request an appropriation in the coming year's budget for installation of a 10-channel tape to be utilized to record the telephone conversations which would remind the employees the conversations are being taped, and also enable the department to verify complaints. In addition, he explained that they intend to conduct intensive quarterly training programs, not only for Customer Service representatives, but also for people in the field who deal directly with customers. Mayor Seymour stated that if the Utility Department is coming forth with some kind of improved public relations training program, as mentioned by Mr. Alario, that would satisfy his concerns that steps are being taken in the right direction. Councilman Kott suggested that in lieu of installation of tape recording devices, which he personally considered to be a waste of money, instead, the Customer Service representatives be required to give their names when answering calls. MOTION: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the report submitted on training for Customer Service representatives was ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED. 153: PREMIUM PAY FOR TEMPORARY UPGRADE - NEW BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE.: Report from the Personnel Director (continued from the meeting of April 25, 1978) 78-550 ~it¥ Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M, recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution which would add an upgrade pay provision to the class of New Business Representative, was submitted. It was explained that this position must be filled at all times, and in those instances where the regular supervisor is gone, this resolution would permit another employee ten~orarily assuming these supervisorial duties to be compensated for same. Councilman Kott indicated that he could not vote favorably on this recommendation in view of the "tight belt" budget. Mayor Seymour indicated he would not vote favorably either, as he felt the Council should first see the level of service delivered for which they are being asked to pay. It was noted in answer to Councilman Roth, that the annual cost of the upgrade pay provision is estimated at $174. Councilwoman Kaywood noted that she has not received any complaints of the nature discussed under the previous item in the four years she has been on the Council and thereupon offered Resolution Noo 78R-285 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Bobk. RESOLUTION NO. 78R-285: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 77R-688, WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR JOB CLASSES REPRESENTED BY THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 47, TO PROVIDE PREMIUM PAY FOR EMPLOYEES TEMPORARILY UPGRADED TO THE JOB CLASS OF NEW BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood and Roth Kott and Seymour None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-285 duly passed and adopted. 139: SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITION 2 CLEAN WATER: (Continued from the Council meeting of May 2, 1978, for report from Councilman Roth regarding the position taken by the County Sanitation District on Proposition 2 scheduled on the June 6,1978 ballot.) The City Clerk reported that Councilman Roth advises the Sanitation Districts have not taken any position on this issue. In response to Councilman Kott's inquiry as to how this proposed legislation would benefit the citizens of Anaheim, Councilwoman Kaywood explained that there is a federal Clean Water Program whereby it is mandated that by 1982 every river, stream, ocean or other waterway shall be swimmable and fishable. The sewage treatment and water reclamation projects to effectuate this clean water program are extremely expensive. The federal government will fund up to 75% of the cost, but the 25% in the State of California will fall either entirely to local govern- ments or, by passage of Proposition 2, be split in half with the State of California paying 12~%. Councilwoman Kaywood, thereupon, moved that the Anaheim City Council go on record as being in support of Proposition 2. Councilman Overbolt seconded the motion. 78-5~1 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote on the motion was requested by the Mayor. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Roth and Seymour Kott None Councilman Kott explained that his "No" vote reflects his opinion that the numbers given do not "add up". 180: AUDIT REPORT - WORKERS COM]PENSATION CLAIM PROGRAM SUBMITTED BY MIKEN ASSOCIATES, INC,: Report dated January 31, 1978 prepared by Miken Associates, Inc. was previously submitted to the Council and continued to this date from the meetings of April 25 and May 2, 1978. MOTION: Motion to receive and file the report was made by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood. Under discussion, Councilman Kott pointed out to Council Members that in his review of the report submitted, the following points were of concern to him: 1) Miken Associates, Inc. was hired to perform an objective audit of the City's Workers Compensation Claims program; however, they also performed an audit of the City's third party claims actions, apparently at no charge to the City, but also without authorization; 2) when he attempted to contact the individual whose name appears on the report, Mr. Ken Savage, he was informed that he had left Miken Associates, Inc. and now works for the firm of Warren, McVeigh and Griffin, who have also performed in some capacity as consultants for the City; 3) the fact that Miken Associates, Inc., as a Delaware Corporation, should have registered with the Secretary of State's Office as a foreign corporation, but has apparently failed to do so. In response to concerns voiced by both Council Members Kott and Seymour regarding a possible conflict of interest situation in that Mr. Ken Savage previously worked with Miken Associates and is now a partner with Warren~ McVeigh and Griffin, Mr. Savage explained that Warren, McVeigh and Griffin are Risk'Management Consultants, and that previous to his merger with them did not have the expertise to investigate claims procedures. Therefore, on a number of occasions they did refer their clients to Miken and Associates for this type of consultation. It seemed a logical progression for Warren, McVeigh and Griffin to attempt to cover that gap in ~heir areas of expertise. In answer to Councilman Kott's comment regarding the fact that Miken and Associates, Inc. is not registered in the State of California, Mr. Hopkins stated that there is a requirement that they register with the Secretary of State's Office and receive a certificate as a foreign corporation. There is also a penalty provided in the Corporations' Code which could be imposed by the Secretary of State for each day business is done without a valid certificate. The Code further provides that such a corporation could not bring a lawsuit in the courts of the State of California. However, Mr. Hopkins stated, in his opinion, the contractual relationship between Miken Associates, Inc. and the City would still be binding, despite the fact that they failed to obtain the certificate. 78-552 City Hal!, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M, Councilman Seymour stated that he took exception to the report in that it appears to place the responsibility for administration of this program with Mr. Ferrone, who only recently came on board, and did recognize the situation and seek to do something about it. He questioned who the responsible party would be for moni- toring and maintaining a relationship with R. L. Kautz to assure that the City was receiving the services contracted for during the 2-year period previous. Mr. Talley stated that he, as City Manager, would have to accept the ultimate responsibility for this program. He noted that when he took over the City Manager position, on reading the management reports there was no notice of any such problem. At this period in time there had just been a change in Council Policy to minimize costs by going self-insured, and by setting up a program of working with departments, as opposed to the claim administrator. There was, in this program, a division of responsibilities which he did not recognize at that time, However, he noted that in the first full year of budget under his administration he had recommended the City enter into a risk management program with a first step being review of where the City is by a consultant, and as a further step in this progression, the Council has agreed to establish positions of Risk Manager and Safety Officer. Councilman Seymour stressed that his primary concern with the audit report is the finding on Page 5, which notes that the first employer's report, which should optimally be submitted within 48 hours, in the vast majority of cases reported it took 10 days or longer for the City departments to submit these reports. This situation persisted for a 2-year period. He inquired as to where the simple management techniques were to monitor and control this situation. He stated it was apparent to him from the audit report that "no one was minding the store". He particularly found fault with the fact that 1) the employer's reports were not submitted within 48 hours; 2) that sufficient funds were not maintained in a trust account to cover the claims; 3) that creditors (medical providers, in this case) were not treated in a more respectable fashion, i.e., by paying their bills on time; 4) that someone was not monitoring the company handling the claims to insure that the City was receiving the service for which it contracted, instead of allow- ing R. L. Kautz and Company to handle over 800 claims per month, instead of the 400 to 600 claims per month they should have been handling. Mayor Seymour summarized that he is disgusted with the level of competence demon- strated in the administration of this program, particularly because it is a major program amounting to an excess of $2 million dollars in claims. Mr. Talley felt it unfair to categorize this program in that fashion, inasmuch as it has not been on a $2 million dollar level for the entire 2-year period, but as it was recognized that costs were rising, the audit was recommended. The problem was addressed at the completion of the 1976-77 fiscal year when several meetings were called to review the situation and it was noted that there was no clear desig- nation of authority in the program, but, rather, many departments were working on different aspects of risk management. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that in the Arthur Young and Company Management Audit for which consultation the City paid over one-half million dollars, the risk management program was established as being of secondary importance in the report on Personnel Department dated March 11; 1975. 78-5~3 Qity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M, Roll call vote on the foregoing motion to receive and file the audit report was requested by Councilman Kott. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, and Roth Kott and Seymour None MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: By general consent, the Council recessed for ten minutes. (3:10 p.m.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present. (3:20 p.m.) 176: PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT NO., 77-18A: In accordance with application filed by the Public Works Director, public hearing was held on proposed abandon- ment of a public alley located between Claudina and Philadelphia Streets from 200 feet, more or less, to 621 feet, more or less, south of Lincoln Avenue, pur- suant to Resolution No. 78R-242, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. Report of the City Engineer was submitted recommending unconditional approval of said abandonment. The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held April 10, 1978, recommended Abandonment No. 77-18A be approved. Mayor Seymour asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman Kott, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council ratified the determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 5, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 78R-286 for adoption approving Abandonment No. 77-18A. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 78R-286: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF AN UN-NAMED PUBLIC ALLEY LOCATED WITHIN THE BLOCK FORMED BY LINCOLN AVENUE, PHILADELPHIA STREET BROADWAY AND CLAUDINA STREET (ABANDONED.) ' Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-286 duly passed and adopted. 78-5f4 City Hall, A~a~eim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P,M, 104: PUBLIC HEARING - STREET LIGHT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1.977-1: To consider objections to the improvement or to the assessment of the proposed Street Light Assessment District 1977-1 along and upon North Street, Lenz Drive and Spring Street in Tract No. 1404. Report from~e Public Works Director was presented recommending that the Street Lighting Assessment District No. 1977-1 for Tract No. 1404 be established with the beginning of the assessment period on October 1, 1978. Mayor Seymour asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mrs. Dorothy Cullen, 828 Lenz Drive, Anaheim, voiced her opposition to the place- ment of one of the proposed street lights between two driveways at 828 and 832 Lenz Drive inasmuch as this is a double driveway with no grass area in between, making it a large concrete area. She felt that the location of the street light there would make it useable as a public playground encouraging children to con- gregate. She requested this light pole be eliminated or moved. Further, Mrs. Cullen advised that many of her neighbors were surprised that they had chosen the ornamental street light, for which they are required to pay some assessmen~ rather than the safety lights. She further indicated that she personally was not opposed to paying for these street lights, but that she knew of other people who had signed the petition not being aware that they were agreeing to paying for the lights. She also submitted a plot plan she had prepared indicating placement of the lights and how this might affect her neighborhood. Because of some confusion as to the amount of assessment per house for the 5-year period, Mr. Bob Herr, representing the City Engineering Department, explained that the entire cost for street lighting maintenance during this period would be $3,423 plus 10% for administration, totaling $3,765, which amounts to a $25.97 cost per individual parcel per year, or approximately $125 total for the 5-year period. Mrs. Adele Cisneros, 832 Lenz Drive, Anaheim, also indicated that the double drive- way situation with the street light would cause problems and suggested this street light be moved to a drainway area on the same side of'the street. There being no further persons who wished to speak, Mayor Seymour closed the public hearing. At the conclusion of the discussion, after reviewing the plot plan showing place- ment of the street lights, Councilman Kott moved that the placement of the street lights be adjusted so that the light proposed to be located in front of 828 Lenz Drive be moved to the drainway area on the same side of the street, but to the south. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 78R-287 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO, 78R-287: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING THAT THERE WAS NOT A MAJORITY PROTEST AGAINST STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1977-1, TRACT NO. 1404. 78-55 5 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES.- May 9, !978, .!:30 P~M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-287 duly passed and adopted. MOTION: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council established the date of October 1, 1978 as the beginning of the assess- ment period for Street Light Assessment District No. 1977-1. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 78R-288 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 78R-288: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC- TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHT- ING IN TRACT NO. 1404, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 10-4870-621-55-6992; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CON- STRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITy CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened June 29, 1978 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-288 duly passed and adopted. 116: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - "BLUE RIBBON" COMMITTEE: Mr. John Flocken, 1320 South Hacienda Street, Anaheim, member of the Economic Development Blue Ribbon Committee, stated that he was sent by the Committee to address the Council and request that they approve the proposed by-laws for the Anaheim Economic Develop- ment Corporation, as submitted, and subsequent to that, and contingent upon approval, that they take under advisement the appointment of two members to the Board of Directors of said corporation. In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, it was pointed out that a pro forma budget in the amount of $104,000 was approved in concept, and that the budget actually established will be based on performance objectives. Councilman Roth summarized that at the last Blue Ribbon Committee meeting a change was made to the proposed by-laws which deleted two appointees coming from the City Manager's Office. These two City representatives would still be involved but their role was changed from that of directorship to membership on the Advisory Board. He stressed that this leaves out of the total ofnine members ok the Board of Directors, two members to be appointed by the City Council. Councilman Roth 78-556 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P,M. addressed his concern to the remaining Council Members that if the $104,000 is only anticipated to be seed money, and this Board of Directors will be handling sums much larger than that, for which the Anaheim City Council will hold the ultimate responsibility, then how will the Council be assured there are adequate safeguards to control the use of these funds. He added that he does support the concept 100% and thinks it is a very viable program. Mr. Talley explained that the original concept for this corporation called for 20% of the funding to come from the Redevelopment Agency and 80% from Manpower funds. He suggested that the desired controls might require an extremely detailed contract that would be post-audited for any City-originated funds. Mayor Seymour suggested that perhaps the experience the City has had with the Anaheim Visitor and Convention Bureau would allay Councilman Roth's fears, inas- much as they have operated successfully with City Council approval of a budget which called for expenditures of one-half million dollars per year, and the City Council has no voting rights on the Board of Directors of the V & C Bureau. In further answer to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Flocken explained that two members proposed to be appointed by the City Manager's Office were removed from the Board of Directors and placed on the Advisory Committee primarily because of concerns regarding clear definition of conflict of interest on the part of these parti- cipants. He also recalled the names of the members of the Blue Ribbon Committee and advised that the by-laws proposed were unanimously recommended by that Committee for Council approval. Councilman Kott questioned Section "K" relating to a provision that, without meeting, action taken by written consent of all members of the Board shall have the same force and effect as unanimous vote of the Directors; and Section "N" regarding conflict of interest provisions. Following brief discussion, it was determined that Section "K" does contain some ambiguities and could use clarification as to whether or not the consent is being given only for the meeting or for the action itself and City Attorney Hopkins suggested this be amended. ' Mr. Flocken explained that Section "N" requires that each Director on the Board will understand and sign a conflict of interest statement. In addition, Mr. Hopkins noted that Government Code Section 1090 prohibits a member of any govern- mental body from having an interest in a contract being acted upon by the govern- ing board of that public entity and this could also be spelled out more clearly in the by-laws. Councilman Kott summarized that he supports the concept of the Economic Development Corporation, but he indicated he would be opposed to the use of City tax funds for such a program and would also oppose the housing of the corporation in City offices. He thought it should be a separate and distinct entity. Councilman Overholt also indicated support for the concept under discussion, but stated that he would be absolutely opposed to the form in which it is presented in the by-laws. He voiced the opinion that this corporation would come as close to 78-557 City Hall,..Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M, being an arm of the City as anything could be, and, therefore, with a beginning budget of $104,000 and the potential of spending much larger sums of money, he felt it sheer foolishness for the Anaheim City Council to even consider appoint- ment of two individuals to a nine-member board. He stressed that the funds will be going into this Economic Development Corporation by reason of the City of Anaheim. Since it is the City Council which is responsive and sensitive to the electorate, with respect to what this corporation does, he felt that the Council, by relin- quishing the right of appointment of any less than four members to the Board, would be abrogating their responsibility to the public. He further voiced concern over many inconsistencies contained in the proposed by-laws which, in his opinion, also represented risks to the City. He recommended that the Board be restructured and that four members of same be appointed by the City Council; four appointed from the private sector; and then these eight members elect the ninth person. In con- clusion, Councilman Overholt suggested that the action approving these by-laws be postponed until the City Attorney's Office reviews the by-laws, and also looks at the question of balance on the governing board, as the check and balance needs to be built into the corporation board from its inception. Mayor Seymour responded that he appreciated Councilman Overholt's concern that there be absolute certainty that the corporation board will carry out the taxpayers' interests and could not agree more. However, he again pointed out that this corpor- ation board is the same vehicle used over the past decade in the V & C Bureau very successfully. He felt the safeguards for the Council would be implemented by close review of the budget and financial auditing. With respect to four appointed members on the board, Mayor Seymour stated that he would be satisfied with two members as adequate, inasmuch as he felt any appointments would be political in nature and he would prefer to keep politics out of this board. He stated he was totally opposed to the concept that the City Manager's Office appoint two members, as was earlier proposed. Councilman Overholt agreed that he would not support appointments by the City Manager's Office either, but disagreed that there is anything wrong with political appointments, defining that he meant appointments made by the entire Council, the five members of the Council agreeing on four individuals whom they feel will best represent the people. The appointees from the Chamber of Commerce would represent the business community and the one from the Board of Realtors would represent the realtors. Councilman Overholt remarked that he felt the funding situation of this proposed corporation would be somewhat different from the V & C Bureau in that they would be empowered to seek different types of funding, whereas the V & C Bureau receives funding through the City. Councilman Roth again stressed that he wants safeguards which will assure him several years from now that all of the funds entrusted to the corporation have been properly spent and all are accounted for. He pointed out that these are federal funds with many strings attached, and the City Council retains the responsibility for their use. MOTION: At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Overholt moved that the proposed-- structure of the Board of Directors of the Economic Development Corporation be amende to include four appointees from the City Council, three appointees from the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce, one from the Board of Realtors, and one mem- ber to be elected by the eight so appointed, making up a nine-member board; and that 78-558 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M. the by-laws be reviewed in light of this amendment and returned with appropriate changes to the Council for approval. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. At Mayor Seymour's suggestion, since he felt the Blue Ribbon Committee had already done their utmost to provide what they felt should be in the by-laws, the foregoing motion was amended to reflect that Councilman Overholt and the City Attorney would review the by-laws and bring proposed changes in same back to the Council for approval. Councilman Roth agreed to second the motion as amended. Councilman Kott remarked that he felt it is the duty of the Anaheim City Council to see that this corporation is properly administered and vowed that he, for one, would be willing to withhold the funds in the event that he feels something is amiss. Vote was taken on the foregoing motion. MOTION CARRIED. 170: EVALUATION OF SLOPE FAILURES - WESTRIDGE TRACT - REPORT FROM PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING COMPANY: Mr. Ron Thompson submitted a report from Pacific Soils Engineering Company regarding the Westridge tract, and in addition, a joint status report from Planning and Public Works dated May 3, 1978. Mr. Thompson explained that it is the opinion of both Public Works and Planning Departments that they con- cur with the evaluation made by Pacific Soils Engineering Company. In addition, it is staff's opinion that the slopes and grading in the Westridge area conformed to the approved grading plans and City ordinances in effect at the time they were originally constructed and inspected. Mr. Thompson reported that the Planning and Public Works staff will continue to work with affected homeowners to obtain solu- tions to individual slope failure and irrigation problems. Mrs. Jan Hall, 545 Tumbleweed Road, Anaheim, stated that she appreciated the tremen- dous amount of work which went into the Pacific Soils Engineering Company report. They did identify all of the problems and have presented each affected homeowner with a report. She indicated that the concern of everyone in the Westridge area now is that the slopes be restored safely, and that some control over this project be instituted. In this connection, she suggested that the City require the purchase of permits by contractors restoring the slopes so that inspections can be made to insure these are restored properly. Mrs. Hall pointed out that this safeguard is necessary, in that many small, private contractors are making overtures to the homeowners to perform this restoration work. She also noted that the situation will not be relieved if only one or two homeowners repair slopes, k is a total problem, and if all of them are not repaired, there will be a general failure once again. In response to Councilman Kott's query regarding cor~ent in the Pacific Soils Report indicating there is still concern as to whom is responsible, Mr. Thompson noted it is necessary for staff to continue to work with affected homeowners to obtain solutions to their individual slope failure problems. The problems and causes are varied, and he noted some might be attributed to lack of maintenance, others, to too much maintenance, failure to take care of gophers, etc. Additional discussion was held regarding substandard irrigation piping utilized on Lots 13 through 16 in Tract No. 7567, during which Mr. Thompson explained that this problem was discovered some time after the installation, only because of report from a former employee of Omega Landscaping Company indicating that 13 lots were installed 78-559 City ~11, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May...9, 1978, 1:30 P.M. with Schedule 20 piping, rather than Schedule 40, as called for. He explained that his staff is working with the City Attorney's Office to utilize the bonds still held against this tract to replace the substandard piping. At the conclusion of discussion, Mrs. Hall expressed her thanks to the Council and staff for the tremendous job they had done in this situation and, in particular, for the assistance and consideration given the homeowners. MOTION: Councilman Seymour moved to receive and file the report from Pacific Soils Engineering Company and to direct that permits be required for regrading and restora- tion of the slopes; said permits to be issued by the City at the cost of the contractor performing this work; and that adequate and complete inspections of the restored slopes be made. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: By general consent, the Council recessed for five minutes. (4:40 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present. (4:45 P.M.) 169: INSTALLATION OF REFLECTIVE AND NON-REFLECTIVE RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS: In accordance with the recommendation submitted by the City Engineer, Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution Nos. 78R-289 and 78R-290 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO, 78R-289: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED UP TO THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON TH~ 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 1978, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF REFLECTIVE AND NON-REFLECTIVE RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 17-4309-776-16-0000. RESOLUTION NO, 78R-290: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQURE THE CONSTRUC- TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: INSTALLATION OF REFLECTIVE AND NON-REFLECTIVE RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 17-4309-776-16-0000; APPROVING THE DESIGNS. PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUC- TION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened June 8, 1978 - 2:00 P.M.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 78R-289 and 78R-290 duly passed and adopted. 156: POLICE HELIPORT ADDITION: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, the award of Account No. 10-4804-987-09-0000, Anaheim Police Heliport Addition was continued to the meeting of May 16, 1978, in accordance with the request of the Engineering Division, Public Works Department. MOTION CARRIED. 78-560 ~_.its~ H_~all, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 9, 1978~ 1:30 P.M. 167: REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL ASSESSMENT - CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS: Mr. Otto Korver, 1110 South Robertson Boulevard, Los Angeles, California, representing Dave Gange, who forwarded the original request for waiver of traffic signal assessment fees (Council Policy No. 214) in connection with a church to be built at Nohl Ranch and Royal Oaks Roads, stated that they were informed very few traffic lights have been installed in conjunction with churches, and their church seeks to enjoy this same privilege. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that the instances in which the Council ~waived traffic signal assessment requirements in the past related to moving of a school across the street and completion of a building program, both of which cases would not generate any additional measurable traffic. She felt that this particular situation, in which an entirely new church is being built, is not analogous. It was reported by Mr. Paul Singer, Traffic Engineer, that this particular signal would be installed along with an already approved AHFP cooperative project to be under construction by August of this year between Villa Real and Imperial Highway on Nohl Ranch Road. Mayor Seymour voiced the opinion that the Council should hold firm to its policy that waivers not be grante~ except in those instances where an addition or improvement to an existing church property is being built, which will not cause any measurable increase in traffic. MOTION: Councilman Seymour thereupon moved that the waiver of Council Policy No. 214 relating to assessment of traffic signal fees, submitted by Mr. Dave Gange on behalf of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, be denied. Councilwoman Kas~ood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 176: ABANDONM]~NT NO. 76-9A EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Dr. and Mrs. E. Charles Hendricks for an extension of time to abandon a portion of a dedicated public street commonly known as MacDuff Street located south of Stonybrook Drive, east of Dale Avenue, was submitted together with report from the City Engineer recommending unconditional approval of said extension of time. Mrs. Hendricks was recognized by the Mayor, and in response to Councilman Kott, advised that she has submitted plans for curb and gutter installation, and lot line adjustment plat to reflect uneven distribution of property; and has ready for submittal a signed hold-harmless agreement and Covenant Not to Sue. Councilwoman Kas~ood offered Resolution No. 78R-291 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO, 78R-2~1: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT NO. 76-9A. 78-561 City Hall, An~aheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL M~MBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-291 duly passed and adopted. 108: APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION PERMIT - CITY OF HOPE: Application for Solicitation Permit from the City of Hope for door-to-door solicitation of funds to benefit medicine and science from June 11 to June 18, 1978, was presented. The City Clerk advised that the organizers verbally reported this date that they are projecting they will raise $5,000 in the City of Anaheim with expenditures of $450, and that the figures shown on the application form related to goals and expenditures throughout all of Southern California. With this additional informa- tion, the City Attorney and Business License Division have no objection to granting of a permit in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code Section 7.32. MOTION: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council approved Solicitation Permit for City of Hope to conduct door-to-door solicitation of funds during the period June 11 to June 18, 1978. MOTION CARRIED. 178: REPORT - ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT BOARD ACTIVITIES: Mr. Gus Lenain presented the Orange County Water District annual report and offered to answer any questions Council might have. In addition, he invited Council Members and the Press to attend a tour of Orange County Water District facilities from the Prado Dam to the Fountain Valley facility on Friday, June 2, 1978, from 9:00 A.M. to about 1:30 P.M. In response to Councilwoman Kaywood's query regarding the desalting plant (Water Factory No. 21), Mr. Lenain explained that this facility is currently producing 50 million gallons per day, which they are pumping back into underground storage. Regarding water rates for the next twelve months, Mr. Lenain remarked that the MW]) is now taking excess water from the Kern River as a supplement to that which is supposed to come from the North, and also to help reduce a flood stage in the San Joaquin Valley. This may prove less costly because the distance is shorter and there is less pumping. However, Mr. Lenain stated that with energy costs as high as they are, water rates will most likely continue to rise. Councilman Kott commented that in conversations with Mr. Lenain, he had ascertained that there actually is another line from bfw-D located somewhere about the freeway and Weir Canyon which could be used to fulfill some of the capacities for which the Diemer Intertie is proposed, 'and at less cost, since its location would not require the amount of energy to distribute water, which the Diemer Intertie will require. Mr. Lenain described that in the pipeline which comes across the Canyon at approxi- mately Coal Canyon, there is a "T" in the line and a crawl hole for inspection of the line which crosses the River. He advised that while he was working for the City, he learned from Mr. Diemer that all that would be necessary to convert this line would be to purchase a "T" and set it crossways on top of the existing "T" to take 78-562 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M, connection from this line, placing a blank flange at the other end. He stated that he believed water pressures would be better at that point, and it would not be necessary to pump as much water as it would from the Intertie. Mr. Lenain stated that there is also a useable connection, which was purchased from the Nohl Ranch at the time land was purchased~ and it is located in the PeraltaHills district. Mr. Lenain summarized that the biggest problem with all of the MWD pipelines is that many cities, aside from Anaheim, use them as reservoirs because they have no storage capacity. He voiced the opinion that this will also be the situation with the Diemer Intertie. He noted, also, that the MWD is thinking of purchasing back from the City of Anaheim that section of Number 2 East line for which the City paid, roughly three-quarters of a million dollars. He was of the opinion that should th~ City sell this back to the MW-D, it would be wise to take that money and invest it back into the water system. (]ouncilman Kott pointed out to the Members of the Council that they had voted for an expenditure of $3 million dollars for the Diemer Intertie, whereas it appeared strange to him that City staff was not aware of the fact that there are other underground facilities availab]e that would have served the same purpose without the (~ity making that expenditure. MOTION: At the conclusion of discussion, on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, the Orange County Water District Board's annual report was ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED° 129: PUBLIC FIREWORKS DISPLAY PERMIT: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the application for Public Fireworks Display Permit filed by Walt Disney Productions to allow discharge of fireworks at Disneyland on May 27 and 28, 1978 at 8:30 P.M. and 10:30 P.M.; and from June 17 through September 9, 1978 at 9~00 F.M.; and on December 31, 1978 at Midnight, was approved, as recommended !~y ~he Fire Marshall~ MOTION CARRIED. CORRECTION OF ZONING DESIGNATION: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 78R-292 for adoption amending Resolution No. 78R-42 to correct the zoning designation shown for Reclassification No. 77-78-31 from RM-1200 to RM-2400o Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 78R-292: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NOr 78R-42 APPROVING ZONING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 77-78-31, NUNC PRO TUNC. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-292 duly passed and adopted. TERMINATION OF PROCEEDINGS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-9 AND VARIANCE NO. 2394: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution Nos. 78R-293 and 78R-294 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 78-563 Qit¥ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M~ RESOLUTION NO. 78R-293: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH ZONING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-9 AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 72R-359 NULL AND VOID. RESOLUTION NO~ 78R-294: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 2394 AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 72R-360 NULL AND VOID. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos, 78R-293 and 78R-294 duly passed and adopted. ~QUEST FOR EVENING MEETING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. NO. 1785, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The City Clerk submitted correspondence received this date from Mrs. Billie L. Byrd, 121 MacArthur Manor, Anaheim, 92805, requesting that the City Council consider conducting the public hearing on Order to Show Cause for Revocation of Conditional Use Permit No. 1785 during the evening hours. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the City Council determined to schedule public hearing on Order to Show Cause why Conditional Use Permit No. 1785 should not be revoked on May 30, 1978 at 7:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED° CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda: 1. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed. a. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission - Minutes of April 19 and 26, 1978. b. 105: Project Area Committee Minutes of April 11, 1978. c. 105: Golf Course Advisory Commission - Minutes of April 26, 1978. 2, 108: DINNER-DANCING PLACE AND PUBLIC DANCE HALL PERMITS: The following permits were approved in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police: a~ Dinner-Dancing Place Permit for The Drawbridge Inn, 950 Ox Road, to allow dancing Sunday through Saturday, from 7:00 P.M. to 2:00 A.M. (Arthur Maige, applicant.) b. Dinner-Dancing Place Permit for The Tartan Drum Restaurant, 524 North Magnolia, to allow dancing Monday through Sunday, from 8:00 P.Mo to 1:00 A.M. (Gerald Dale, applicant.) 78-564 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M. c. Public Dance Hall Permit for the Coronado Lounge, 1274 South Magnolia, for dan<lng Tuesday through Monday, 10:00 A.M. and 2:00 A.M., without admission charge. (Michael Mastrosimone, applicant.) MOT]ON CARRIED. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: Councilman Roth offered Resolution Nos. 78R-295 through 78R-301, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with the reports, recommenda- tions and certifications furnished each Council Member, and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 78R-295: A RESOLUTION OF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING DEEDS OF EASEMENT AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Ball Road 863, Ltd.; William D. Procopio; .Jefferson Lee Eckels, et al; William L. Kyle, et ux; Elma Spaulding; Afton Reinert, et ux; Archie B. Hanlen, et ux; Village Center Apts.) 129: RESOLUTION NO 78R-296: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING THE NECESSITY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 39576.5 TO CONTRACT FOR THE CI~TING AND REMOVAL OF ALL RANK GROWTH AND WEEDS, AND REMOVAL 0¥ RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT UPON ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY OR ANY PUBLIC STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALLING FOR BiDS THEREON, AND AU%HORIZ- lNG PUBLICATION OF NOTICE THEREFOR, ACCOUNT NO. 10-4380-202-10. (1978-1979) (Bids to be opened May 25, 1978 - 2:00 P.M.) 144: RESOLUTION NO. 78R-297: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: EUCLID STREET STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, RIVERSIDE FREEWAY TO LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANA}~IM, A.H.F.P. NO. 836, ACCOUNT NO. 13-4309-737-16-0000; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZ- ING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened 5une 8, 1978 - 2:00 P.M.) 170: RESOLUTION NO. 78R-298: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTHWEST O~ OWENS DRIVE AND NORTH OF MOHLER DRIVE, EAST OF COUNTRY HILL ROAD. 170: RESOLUTION NO. 78R-299: A RESDLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN ADJACENT PARCELS PURSUANT TO LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT MARKED EXHIBIT "A" AND ATTACHED HERETO ON PERALTA HILLS DRIVE IN TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM. i76: RESOLUTION NO..,... 78R-300: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTS. (Public hearing to be held May 30, 1978, 3:00 P.M.) 176: RESOLUTION NO 78R-301: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON A CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET AND FIXING A DATE FOR A HEARING THEREON. (Public hearing to he held May 30, 1978, ~:O0 P.M.) 78-565 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ma.y 9~ 1978~ 1:30 ~M~ Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 78R-295 through 78R-301, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. 170: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SUNBURST DEVELOPMENT, INCo: At the request of Mayor Seymour, this item was removed from the above Consent Calendar, as he wished to disclose that he is in the process of purchasing property in the particular development and would, therefore, abstain from discussion and voting on the matter. Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 78R-302 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO, 78R-302: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTHEAST OF VIA SABIA, WHICH IS WEST OF ANAHEIM HILLS ROAD. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott and Roth NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-302 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3854: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3854 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 3854: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL ZONE RELATING TO ZONING. (72-73-51(23), RS-HS-22,000(SC)) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3854 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3855: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 3855 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 3855: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-55(6), CL) 78-566 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 9~ 1978, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3855 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3856: Councilman Overholt offered Ordinance No. 3856 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 3856: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (77-78-49, CL) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3856 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NOS, 3857 THROUGH 3861: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance Nos. 3857 through 3861, both inclusive, for first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 3857: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.420 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTED TO FACILITATE STREET SWEEPING. ORDINANCE NO. 3858: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SUBSECTIONS .1010 AND .1020 RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS. ORDINANCE NO 3859: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69(84), ML) ORDINANCE NO, 3860: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-30(8), RS-7200(SC)) ORDINANCE NO, 3861: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-46(8), (RS-HS-10,O00(SC)) 142: CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE COUNCIL WORK DISCUSSION: Mr. Overholt introduced the subject, indicating it was his understanding each of the Council Members was to nominate two possible appointees to the Charter Review Committee this date, and each of thmse nominees would then be appointed by a majority vote of the entire Council. He suggested, because of the necessity to have any proposed Charter revi- sions ready for the ballot by the 1st of August, that the Council be prepared to accomplish these appointments at the next meeting, May 16, 1978. 78-567 City Hall, Anaheim, .California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M, Councilman Roth advised that he would not be in attendance at the next meeting but, so as not to delay the Council, would submit his two nominees, in writing, to the City Clerk. Mayor Seymour reviewed that the Charter Review Committee would be asked 1) to conduct a review of the entire city Charter; 2) to research and investigate a potential change governing campaign contributions and expenditures; 3) to carry forth any subsequent charge given them by the City Council. Councilman Roth added to this that the City Council itself was to meet and try to make a decision on the question of extending City Council membership from five to seven people, and the method of electing a Mayor; and if the Council could not come to terms on these matters, they would then charge the Charter Review Committee to include same in their deliberations. The City Council determined, by general consent, they would present nominations and make appointments to the Charter Review Committee on May 16, 1978, and in addition, the Council would hold their first work session on Monday, June 5, 1978 at 3:00 P.M. (place to be later determined by the City Clerk.) 114: LIAISON COMMITTEE REPORT: Mr. Overholt reported to fellow Council Members that he had participated in his first Liaison Committee Meeting this date, with the Mayor, Stadium Director and City Manager. The meeting was largely devoted to bringing himself up to date on the Rams negotiations, since he has been charged by the Mayor with being informed in this particular area. It was announced that the next Liaison Committee meeting, which would deal with HACMAC, will be held Friday, May 12, 1978, and the Liaison Committee Members would be Councilwoman Kaywood and Mayor Seymour. 148: RESIGNATION - ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIl.: Councilwoman Kaywood submitted a letter received from Mrs. Pat Kenworthy indicating resignation of her position as alternate to the Orange County Health Planning Council, because she is moving from the area. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the resignation of Mrs. Pat Kenworthy as alternate to the Orange County Health Planning Council was accepted, with regrets, and a vacancy declared. MOTION CARRED. 148: SCAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEES: For Council Members' choices and information, Councilwoman Kaywood submitted a list of SCAG Policy Advisory Committees and appointments, noting Mayor Seymour's name on the Economic Development Committee. 166: POLITICAL SIGNS ON UTILITY POLES: Councilwoman Kaywood noted that she is still aware of many (both old and new) political campaign signs still posted on City utility poles. She urged that the City Council adopt a regulation that any candidate for an office representing any portion of Anaheim, not just local municipal elections, be required to post sufficient bond so that political signs would be removed at the candidates's expense. 78-568 City Hal~..1, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES May 9, 1~78, ...1:30 P,M. City Attorney Hopkins explained that he has researched this subject and the City Manager's Office has conducted a survey, indicating that where there is a prohi- bition against posting of signs, the courts have held this an unconstitutional impairment of free speech rights. The courts have, further, held that an absolute prohibition on the posting of signs of any kind may be allowed, provided there is a good reason, i.e., possible injury to the utility linemen from nails on the poles. He explained that they are continuing with this research and would present a report to Council at the May 16, 1978 meeting. 175: ARTICLE IN ANAHEIM BULLETIN REGARDING SUNDESERT PROJECT: At the request of Councilman Kott, Mr. Ed Alario, Assistant Utilities Director, clarified that Mr. Hoyt's statement, which was misquoted in the Anaheim Bulletin article, was to the effect that, in fact, the generation project continues past the study phase, and the City decides to withdraw from same, the City would then receive the funds back which were expended during the study phase; if, however, the pro- ject is cancelled for any reason or does not proceed, these funds would not come back to the City. 132: TRASH STRIKE: Councilman Kott noted that he had received several calls from citizens regarding the on-going trash strike, and in particular, one individual suggested that the contract between the trash disposal companies and the union recognize one another so that the matter might be settled by arbitration. He asked whether the City has any control over the trash disposal companies and their relationship with the unions. Mr. Hopkins replied that the City has no control over labor relations policies of the trash disposal companies; that would be a private matter subject to National Labor Relations Board action. The City could not mandate such requirement on the trash disposal companies. Additionally, Mr. Thornton Piersall reported that staff has been discussing with both trash contractors a proposal to make refunds to the users for those collections never made, and a recommendation will be presented to the City Council at their next meeting. Mr. Piersall further summarized that the strike is still on; however, it is believed that a majority of the strikers have returned to work and the union is intending to call for a vote on the final offer. 105: ATTENDANCE AT BOARD AND COMMISSION MEETINGS BY APPOINTED MEMBERS: Councilman Kott called attention to an anonymous note placed in his mail regarding the late arrival of Commissioner Linn at Planning Commission meetings. He suggested that the Council request the Zoning Supervisor to present attendance records for the Planning Commissioners over the past twelve months so that the City Council might utilize this information in making decisions which are in the best interests of the City and those who utilize the Planning Commission. Mayor Seymour advised that he shared Councilman Kott's concern on this issue and suggested this matter be discussed by the Council Liaison Committee and the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Commission involved prior to the entire Council making any decisions. He advised that his personal feelings on the matter are that, so long as the work of the Commission is not being damaged or hindered, then some amount of flexibility should be allowed. 78-569 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M. Mayor Seymour, thereupon, asked the City Clerk to furnish for the Council the attendance records of all Boards and Commissions, inasmuch as he felt it appropriate at this juncture for the Council to review the functions of these groups, and where necessary, pull them together or, if no longer needed, dissolve them. He would propose to use the Council Liaison Committee to initiate some thinking on these Boards and Commissions, and then bring the matter to the full Council for decision. 114: PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE STATE - COUNCILMAN ROTH: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, Councilman Roth was granted permission to leave the state for 90 days. MOTION CARRIED~ 142: CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE NOMINATIONS: Councilman Roth announced that the two nominees whose names he will give to the City Clerk for action by the City Council next week in his absence are: Mr. Jack Ward, 1736 Greenleaf, Anaheim and Mr. Gaylen Compton, 2304 East Cliffpark, Anaheim. 148: ORANGE COUNTY LEAGUE OF CITIES SELECTION OF AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSIONER: Mayor Seymour advised that at the upcoming Thursday evening meeting of the Orange County League of Cities, am appointment will be made to the Airport Land Use Commission and he would seek concurrence from the remainder of the Council on his ballot choice, Virginia Farmer, from the City of Placentiao He explained that to his knowledge, Mrs. Farmer would make a good representative for the City of Anaheim, inaamuch as she has taken a position of opposition to the Chino Hills Airport proposal and/or any furtherance of study or research activity on the same. Councilwoman Kaywood noted that Mrs. Farmer is an experienced planner. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Kott, the Anaheim City Council determined they would concur with Mayor Seymour's vote for Virginia Farmer as the Orange County League of Cities Selection Committee appointment to the Airport Land Use Commission. MOTION CARRIED. 174: PROPOSED CETA LEGISLATION: With regard to pending federal legislation regarding the CETA program (House Resolution No. 11086 and Senate Bill 2570), rewriting CETA re-enactment legislation, which asks that local agencies pick up such costs as retirement and unemployment benefits, which would have to be paid for out of local funds, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 78R-303 for adoption urg~g that this legislation be amended in those areas which would adversely affect the City and local jurisdictions. (Said resolution is recommended by the Orange County League of Cities.) Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 78R-303: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM URGING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION REGARDING RE-ENACTMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ACT (CETA). Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 78R-303 duly passed and adopted. 78-570 Qit¥ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 9, 1978, 1:30 P.M. 148: REPORT ON CONSORTIUM CITIES MEETING MAY 5, 1978: Councilman Seymour reported that he had attended the Consortium Cities Meeting last Friday at which SCAG and League of California Cities dues were discussed. Written reports of the meeting were previously distributed to each Council Member. Councilman Roth commended the Consortium Cities en the action taken, stating he felt it to be in the right direction. ADJOURNMENT: On motion by Councilman Kott, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the Anaheim City Council adjourned to Wednesday, May 10, 1978, 3:30 P.M., Central Library, Multi-purpose Room, for a joint meeting with the Library Board. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5:50 P.M.