AHA-2020/11/10 ANAHEIM HOUSING AUTHORITY
REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 10, 2020
The Anaheim Housing Authority regular meeting of November 10, 2020 was called to order
telephonically at 5:16 P.M. in joint session with the Anaheim City Council, pursuant to Brown Act
related provisions of Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-29-20 in response to COVID-19
(superseding the related provisions stated in Executive Order N-25-20), The meeting notice,
agenda, and related materials were duly posted on November 5, 2020.
PRESENT: Chairman Harry Sidhu and Authority Members Stephen Faessel, Denise
Barnes, Jordan Brandman, Jose F. Moreno, Lucille Kring, and Trevor
O'Neil (all via teleconference).
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Jim Vanderpool, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and
Secretary Theresa Bass.
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA:
Secretary Theresa Bass announced staff requested the removal of Item Nos. 01 and 02 from
the agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Six electronically submitted public comments related to Housing Authority Item Nos. 01 and 02.
—See Appendix.
CONSENT CALENDAR: At 5:20 P.M., the consent calendar was considered.
MOTION: Authority Member Faessel moved to approve the consent calendar as presented, in
accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each Housing Authority
member and as listed on the consent calendar, seconded by Authority Member O'Neil. ROLL
CALL VOTE: AYES —7 (Chairman Sidhu and Authority Members Faessel, Barnes, Brandman,
Moreno, Kring, and O'Neil). NOES —0. Motion carried.
A123 1. Approve a Negotiation Agreement with Retirement Housing Foundation, in substantial
form, for development at 113 and 119 N. Philadelphia Street and 280 E. Lincoln Avenue
for a term of 180 days with three 30-day optional extensions; authorize the Executive
Director of the Housing Authority, or designee, to execute and administer the agreement;
and determine that the agreement is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional
environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines,
Section 15061(b)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
Item No. 01 removed at the request of staff;no action taken.
Anaheim Housing Authority Minutes of November 10,2020
Page 2 of 2
2. Approve a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Anaheim and Anaheim Ballet to allow
A123 the parties to cooperatively identify and evaluate potential relocation sites for the ballet
and/or the feasibility of the ballet acquiring the site it currently occupies (Cultural Arts
Building); and authorize the Executive Director of the Anaheim Housing Authority, or
designee, to execute and administer the agreement (Related to Council Item No. 12).
Item No. 02 removed at the request of staff; no action taken.
AHA177 3. Approve minutes of the Housing Authority meeting of October 27, 2020.
ADJOURNMENT:
With no further business to conduct, Chairman Sidhu adjourned the meeting of the Anaheim
Housing Authority at 5:21 P.M.
Respectfully-submitted,
ijo
Th4resa)3ass, CMC
Secretary,Anaheim Housing Authority
Public Comment
From: Brian DeMers
Sent: Monday, November 9, LULU 4:58 PM
To: Public Comment
Cc: Harry Sidhu (Mayor); Stephen Faessel; Denise Barnes; Jordan Brandman; Jose Moreno;
Lucille Kring; Trevor O'Neil
Subject: Oppose the sale of Cultural Arts Center (Anaheim Ballet)
Council members and city leaders,
Please vote against the proposed sale of the Cultural Arts Center at 280 E Lincoln Ave, home of the Anaheim Ballet, on
the agenda for 11/10.
Our residents, council members, mayors, and city staff have done tremendous work to revitalize Downtown Anaheim
and highlight the rich history of our city.
While much of this work has included restoration and preservation of historic homes and buildings (i.e. The Packing
House, Kramer building, Mills Act homes, etc), we have also seen redevelopment of large areas for "mixed" use (Alexan
CtrCity, Harbor Lofts, etc).
The most successful projects from, from my simple point of view, have been those that maintain the integrity and story
of the existing structures.
To redevelop this site into high-density housing (over 80 units/acre) would rob Downtown Anaheim of its history and its
culture.
If redevelopment is necessary, or more revenue is needed from this site, please explore ways to revitalize as another
anchor in our growing downtown. It is walking distance to the Packing District, Pearson Park, and Center Street, and
would be well positioned for cultural festivals and events.
I am proud to live in Anaheim, and I'm proud of what our leaders and our community have done to create the city we
have today. Please do not sell our culture and our history. It should remain with the city and the residents for the future.
- Brian DeMers, Resident
S Olive St, District 3
Jennifer L. Hall
From: Loretta Day
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 6:58 PM
To: Theresa Bass
Cc: Jennifer L. Hall; Lauren Torres
Subject: Fwd: Housing Authority Item Council Agenda 11/10/2020
FYI
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Keith Olesen
Date: November 9, 2uzu at e:z�:zzs vm ra 1
To: "Harry Sidhu (Mayor)" <HSidhu@anaheim.net>, Stephen Faessel <sfaessel@anaheim.net>,
Lucille Kring <LKring@anaheim.net>, Trevor O'Neil <toneil@anaheim.net>, Jordan Brandman
<jbrandman@anaheim.net>, Denise Barnes <dbarnes@anaheim.net>, Jose Moreno
<JMoreno@anaheim.net>
Cc: Loretta Day <LDay@anaheim.net>, Council <council@anaheim.net>
Subject: Housing Authority Item Council Agenda 11/10/2020
Dear Mayor and City Council
I'm writing to urge you to oppose the item on your agenda under the Anaheim Housing
Authority. This involves the agreement to sell city owned property located and 113 and 119 N.
Philadelphia and 280 E Lincoln (Cultural Arts Building). There are several reasons to oppose
this proposal. The building itself is one of the very, very few remaining buildings left from old
Anaheim. As such it should be treasured, not destroyed.
The historic nature of the building is not, however, the only reason this project should not go
forward. The proposal is far too dense (100 units on 1.15 acres or 87 dwelling units per acre) and
is in a part of the city that is already burdened by decades of high density housing. The aging
infrastructure cannot handle the increase in residential density and there is no stated plan to
improve it in the near future.
In addition the parcel is within close proximity to already existing affordable housing projects
and is located in a part of the city that is already home to the lowest income levels in the city.
These neighborhoods and the rental properties within them need attention, not more high density
rental housing. The property has served the community as a senior center, a community meeting
facility, and currently as home to the Anaheim Ballet.
It should continue with this and/or similar uses and not converted to housing.
Thank you for your consideration.
Keith Olesen
Anaheim 92805
Jennifer L. Hall
From: Loretta Day
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 8:30 AM
To: Theresa Bass
Cc: Jennifer L. Hall; Lauren Torres
Subject: FW: Proposed sale of Cultural Arts Center and adjacent park
From: Lis Sos
Sent: Monday, November U9, LULU /:31 PM
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor) <HSidhu@anaheim.net>; Jose Moreno <JMoreno@anaheim.net>; sfaessel@anahaiem.net;
Jordan Brandman <JBrandman@anaheim.net>; Denise Barnes <DBarnes@anaheim.net>; Trevor O'Neil
<TONeil@anaheim.net>; Iring@anaheim.net; Loretta Day <LDay@anaheim.net>
Subject: Proposed sale of Cultural Arts Center and adjacent park
To: City Council Members:
This email is to make known my opposition of selling the Cultural Arts Center and adjacent park space to an
affordable housing developer. I believe that tearing down a historical arts space for housing developing
purposes is not the direction we want to go in as a city. In addition, placing 100 residential units in a space of
1.15 acres is creating density issues that are not needed within our downtown area.
I know we want to attract more walking pedestrian traffic, but how about letting Anaheim residents know about
the events that are happening to attract pedestrian traffic first? I have been in Anaheim for 5 years now and
knowing what is going on within downtown is a hit and miss where I have to purposefully hunt down
information. I have lived in Long Beach and Fullerton that have revived various areas within their limits and
their coordination was seamless in letting residents know what is going on. I do not know what is happening
within Anaheim where someone cannot coordinate this aspect to let people know what is happening in this
area? When things are flop because a lack of know how in this aspect it looks as if all was done to attract to
events, and that there is no interest. Let's tighten the ship and get to working with what we have so far, and see
what has worked in similar cities around us.
As a mother of an avid artist and supporter of the arts and community programs I believe the use of
this building is better suited for youth activities, senior programs, and attracting artists within the area.This
project is not something we need more of.
Thank you for your attention and I hope you make a decision that benefits the residents of our city by rejecting
this proposal.
Lisette Sosa
Ananeim, Lti yZZSU�
Public Comment
From: Loretta Day
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 9:59 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: FW: Anaheim Cultural Arts Center
Third email re: CCM 11/10, Cultural Arts Center
From: LTORGERSON(
Sent: Tuesday, November 1U, LULU 9:53 AIVI
To: Denise Barnes <DBarnes@anaheim.net>; Harry Sidhu (Mayor) <HSidhu@anaheim.net>; Jordan Brandman
<JBrandman@anaheim.net>; Jose Moreno <JMoreno@anaheim.net>; Lucille Kring <LKring@anaheim.net>; Stephen
Faessel <SFaessel@anaheim.net>; Trevor O'Neil <TONeil@anaheim.net>
Cc: Loretta Day <LDay@anaheim.net>
Subject: Anaheim Cultural Arts Center
Dear Mayor Sidhu and City Council Members,
My husband Larry and I would like to strongly discourage you from selling this property to a developer who
will tear down the historic building and build an incredibly dense housing project. Here are our main objections,
although, frankly, you all should be aware of these points already:
1) The project is WAY too dense for this small piece of property. Period.
2) Parking and traffic is already an issue. This will exacerbate it.
3) The 92805 zip code already has more than its fair share of low income housing. Find a piece of city property
that is like valued in an area where they DO NOT have their fair share of low income housing. Low income
families should have the opportunity to live anywhere in the city, not just 92805.
4) There are only three historic public buildings left in this immediate area - the Kraemer Bldg., the Carnegie
Library, and the Anaheim Cultural Arts Center, formerly the original Parish Hall of Zion Lutheran Church.
There is no good reason to demolish yet another piece of Anaheim's history.
5) The location of the Anaheim Ballet is crucial to its mission, to provide an opportunity for disadvantaged
youth to participate in a fine arts program of music and dance. If you take the program out of this neighborhood,
it will decrease the chances that these youth will be able to access the program.
Do the right thing - deny this project at this location. Thank you for your consideration.
Dinah Torgerson
Ananelm
Public Comment
From: Loretta Day
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 2:40 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: FW: Anaheim Cultural Center/Anaheim Ballet
From: Audrey Mammo
Sent: Tuesday, November 1U, LULU 1:4/ NIVI
To: Harry Sidhu (Mayor) <HSidhu@anaheim.net>; Jose Moreno <JMoreno@anaheim.net>; Stephen Faessel
<SFaessel@anaheim.net>; Jordan Brandman <JBrandman@anaheim.net>; Denise Barnes <DBarnes@anaheim.net>;
toniel@anaheim.net; Iring@anaheim.net; Loretta Day <LDay@anaheim.net>
Subject: Anaheim Cultural Center/Anaheim Ballet
Dear Anaheim City Council Members,
It has come to my attention that there has been a proposal to have the Anaheim Cultural center/Anaheim Ballet
to be removed and replaced by a small low cost housing area.This greatly saddens me. I have been a resident of
Anaheim for 30+ years.I have gone to school here, Raised my family here and have done a countless number of
fundraising for the various organizations my children were involved in. I have so many friends who have
benefited from the services the ballet company offers. Such as low cost or scholarship programs to help the kids
who are unable to pay the tuition. I have friends whose children now attend as well. I also have friends who still
send in a donation every year, showing just how grateful to have been a part of such a wonderful organization.
The ballet company has served as a stepping stone and gateway to a career in dance or college scholarships for
so many here in Anaheim.. Their program does such a great service to our community. It would be a shame to
lose such a great program that services our children and seniors in Anaheim.
It seems to me that as large as this city is, there has to be some other city property that would be able to
facilitate this project. perhaps West Anaheim. The city has very few historical buildings left in the downtown
area, it would be a shame to lose yet another. I have often enjoyed looking at this building and its great
architecture from the park across the street. as well as so many of the community who live here in the Colony.
In recent times and a little further into our pandemic I have also found great comfort and happiness
enjoying watching the students take their ballet classes outside during these turbulent times.
In closing I hope the council will take a deeper look into other sites that can facilitate this request and save one
of our only historical buildings here in downtown. Not to mention a great service to our community!
Audrey Cl;ark
Hon. Shirley McCracken, Retired
Anaheim, UA 92801
Hon. Mayor & Council Members
Anaheim City Hall
Anaheim, CA 92805
Re: Anaheim Ballet
Dear Mayor and Council members,
November 7, 2020
In the late nineties after a serious fiscal challenge earlier, Anaheim was enthusiastically
working to make Anaheim a "great city" that supported a balance of business, enter-
tainment, sports and the arts. Symphonies, bands and theater wwere brought to parks.
Schools increased program in the arts. The Anaheim Arts Council was a vital organiza-
tion working on an Anaheim Cultural plan.
At a county -wide arts festival, a ballet company performed at South Coast Plaza and I
with Anaheim Arts Council members met Larry Rosenberg, the ballet director. Larry
shared two messages ... the ballet was looking for a new home and his experience as a
dance judge for Disneyland he was familiar with talented but untrained Anaheim dancers.
We came back to share the message with Mayor, Council and staff. Thus evolved a
request to the ballet company and school to come to Anaheim with an offer of classroom
space in exchange for services to youth and the community of Anaheim. Their supporters
in South County did not welcome the move.
For over two decades Anaheim Ballet has trained hundreds of young people from
Anaheim and from other nations. It not only provides support for the Anaheim
community but receives international recognition of Anaheim through the dancers
produced and the choreography of Sarma Rosenberg
Even in a fiscally difficult time, please do what you can to feed the spirit of the
community which the arts do.
Hon. Shirley McCracken, Retired.