Loading...
87-379RESOLUTION NO. 87R-379 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2907. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive an application for a conditional use permit with a waiver of certain provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code from JERAL D. STANLEY AND DORTHEAL E. STANLEY, 236 South Ash Street, Anaheim, CA 92805, owners on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: LOT 86 OF TRACT NO. 1565 AS PER MAP SHOWN IN BOOK 49, PAGES 20 TO 24 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing upon said application at the City Hail in the City of Anaheim, notices of which public hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of ali evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. PC87-135 denying Conditional Use Permit No. 2907; and WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law, an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion, caused the review of said Planning Commission action at a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public hearing, the City Council did hold and conduct such public hearing and did give ail persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard and did receive evidence and reports, and did consider the same; and WHEREAS, the City Council does find, after careful consideration of the action of the City Planning Commission and ail evidence and reports offered at said public hearing before the City Council, that ali of the conditions and criteria set forth in Section 18.05.050.050 of the Anaheim Municipal Code are not present for the following reasons: 1. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; and 2. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare; and 3. That the granting of the conditional use permit would be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, said application requests a waiver of the following provision(s) of the Anaheim Municipal Code: SECTIONS 18.06.050.0212 - MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AND 18.41.066.050 (13 required; 3 proposed) AND WHEREAS, the City Council does further find, after careful consideration of the action of the Planning Commission and ali evidence and reports offered at said public hearing before the City Council regarding said requested waiver(s), that all of the conditions set forth in Section 18.06.080 of the Anaheim Municipal Code are not present, and that the aforesaid waiver(s) should be denied, for the following reasons: 1. That the variance(s) will cause an increase in traffic congestion in the immediate vicinity and adversely affect adjoining land uses; and 2. That the granting of the variance(s) will be detrimental to the peace, health, safety or general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that, for the reasons hereinabove stated, the action of the City Planning Commission denying said conditional use permit be, and the same is hereby, affirmed and that the request of the applicant to permit office use of a residential structure with a waiver of certain provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, denied. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the time within which rehearings must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section 1.12.100 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and the time within which judicial review of final decisions must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Anaheim City Council Resolution No. 79R-524. -2- THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 8th day of September, 1987. MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM BG/jb 2060L 102387 -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the ioregoing Resolution No. 87R-379 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 8th day of September, 1987, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Hunter, Kaywood and Bay NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle and Pickler ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim .signed said Resolution No. 87R-379 on the 8th day of September, 1987. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 8th day of September, 1987. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 87R-379 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on September 8, 1987.