Loading...
1977/01/0477-1 City Hall, Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January. 4~ 1977.~ 9:30 A.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session for the purpose of conducting a work session on the Third Year Redevelopment Block Grant Budget. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour (arrived 9:45 a.m.), Kott, Roth and Thom COUNCIL M~MBERS: None CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Norman Priest HOUSING DIRECTOR: Rosario Mattessich NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION COORDINATOR: Gus Duran CO~UNITY SERVICES MANAGER: Bill Vasquez Mayor Thom called the meeting to order at 9:35 a.m. CO~MUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT BUDGET - THIRD YEAR: Prior to the meeting a report had been submitted to Council dated December 7, 1976, setting forth three alternative Budget plans labeled "A", "B" and "C". Mr. Priest advised that be- cause of the lengthy review' process, it is necessary to designate one of these Plans at this time for submission to the clearing house although it may still be amended at the two public hearings to be held subsequent to this date. Mr. Mattessich outlined the basic differences in the three Budget Plans indicating that Plan "A" leans heavily toward the Housing Program, Plan "B" has the least amount for housing and most for public improvements, while Plan "C" is the most balanced both in terms of housing and public improvements. Because of the interest demonstrated at the last public hearing relative to a Community Center, Mr. Bill Vasquez briefly reported on some of the findings in a survey he had conducted of such facilities in neighboring cities. It was noted that there is an allocation of $130,000.00 from the Second Year Community Development Block Grant Program for a Community Center and any expen- diture plan set forth in the third year would be an addi'tion to these funds. Additional discussion addressed the size, physical features, layout, location and services to be provided within the proposed Community Center. The fact that an interim facility, to be developed within Project Alpha area had been con- sidered was introduced, but the Council was somewhat reluctant to spend the amount of money under consideration on an interim facility. It was reported that the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department had initially discussed utilization of this capital in a joint project with the Anaheim Union High School District to build two combination gymnasium and multi-purpose rec- reational centers at two junior high school properties (sites suggested were Fremont and Sycamore Junior High Schools). Under this proposal, the joint facility would serve as a junior high school gymnasium during school hours and a Community Center after school hours. The capital to be forwarded from Community Development Block Grant Funds would be matched by the School District. It was stressed that this suggestion is in very premature form but if the Council wishes, the idea could be explored further. 77-2 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES -.January 4.~ 1977, 9:30 P.M. There has been further discussion regarding the possible utilization of the George Washington School, should the School District decide to remove all educational pro- grams from that facility, however, to date no definite decision has been made by the School Board. In response to the idea of converting the George Washington School over to this purpose, Councilman Seymour expressed the concern shared by some Membera of the Council that if, in fact, the City does have success in its housing and preservation efforts, then these restored areas will provide homes for young families and will again generate a school age population. He stressed that he had a real concern that the George Washington School remain operative, at least until the Neighborhood Preservation Program can be assessed to determine whether it is increasing the number of younger families in the area.' Toward this end, he indicated his willingness to meet with the Anaheim Elementary School District and Councilman Seymour thereupon moved that Mr. Priest be directed to communicate with the Anaheim Elementary School Board asking them to meet with the City Council sometime within the next 30 days to discuss this situation. Councilwoman Kaywood.seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Richard Vargas, Chairman of the Community Services Advisory Board, commented that the proposals to utilize existing school property or to build adjacent to schools would not provide a facility within the time frame the Council promised they would have an answer for the youth (January 14, 1977), who are primarily interested in a Community Facility which would serve as a youth drop-in center. He suggested the Council discuss some type of interim program and what the opportunities are for conversion of an existing structure to this use. The alternative plan of building two facilities he felt was out of the question since the decision has not even been made as to where the first one would be built. He pointed out that neither Sycamore nor Fremont Junior High Schools are within the Community Development Block Grant target area. In reference to a youth drop-in function for the Community Center, he felt that close prox- imity to any school area should be strongly reconsidered in light of the fact that part of the function would be counseling of youths with psychiatric and drug problems and further that with only a part time facility, i.e., being restricted to after school hours, certain planned programs which would normally occur during the school day could not be carried forward. Although it was stressed that there has not been any decision in detail as to the specific size or make-up of the community facility itself, some discussion was held regarding the fact that the $130,000.00 currently allocated would not be sufficient and a budget for this facility should more likely approach the neighborhood of $500,000.00. Modifications of the three alternative Budget Plans presented were discussed. MOTION: At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Seymour commented that he felt Plan "C" appears to be the most reasonable approach to take as it con- tinues the efforts begun a year ago and at the same time, although completion of the Community Center under Plan "C" would require matching funds from other sources, it adds $120,000.00 to the current allocation bringing it up to $250,000.00 total at this point. Councilman Seymour thereupon moved that Plan "C" be adopted in principle for the Third Year Community Development Block Grant Program and authorized staff to draft the Third Year Application accordingly. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the'motion. MOTION CARRIED. 77-3 Ci~ty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977, 9:30 A.M. >Ir. Vargas recalled that the Community Services Board had directed a letter to the Council asking that they not approve either Plan "A", "B" or "C" and that the Council look at one item, the multi-purpose center. In view of the action taken by the Council, Mr. Vargas extended an invitation for a Council represen* tative to attend their meeting on Thursday, January 13, 1977, and explain the situation to the Community Services Board Members. Mayor Thom indicated that he or another Council Member would be present. LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS ACT GRANTS: On report from the City Manager that the following action would not affect the City Council's ability to approve award of contract bids, on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council authorized the City Manager to sign offers of grants for the follow- ing Local Public Works Capital Development and Investment Act Grants: Modjeska Community Center, Gaymont storm drain, alley reconstruction, Barrier Free Anaheim Project, Lincoln Avenue landscaping. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council authorized the City Manager and Finance Director to sign the authorized signature card for payment vouchers on letters of credit in connec- tion with the Local Public Works Capital Development and Investment Act Grants. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess to Executive Session, Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (10:55 a.m.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order all Council Members being present (11:24 a.m.). ADJOURi~NT: Councilman Kott moved to adjourn. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 11:25 A.M. / LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK 77-4 ~ity Hall~ ~naheim., California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4~ 1977, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in re~gular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom COUNCIL ME~ERS: None CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts STADIUM, CONVENTION CENTER, GOLF COURSE DIRECTOR: Tom Liegler FIRE CHIEF: James Riley CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR - PLANNING: Phil P. Schw~rtze ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR - ZONING: Annika Santalahti TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Paul Singer Mayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance to the Council Meeting. INVOCATION: Reverend Dennis Bailey of the Melodyland Hotline Center gave the invocatiOn. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman John Seymour led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 1977 DISNEYLAND AMBASSADRESS: Mrs. Mary Jones introduced Miss Susan Donald, the 1977 Disneyland Ambassadress, to the City Council. Mayor Thom presented Miss Donald with an attache case and flowers. ORANGE COUNTY REVENUE SHARING FUNDS (RIVERDALE PARK): Supervisor Ralph Clark pre- sented a check in the amount of $116,600 from Orange County revenue sharing funds ~o~ the County's share in acquisition of 8.8 acres of Riverdale Park. Mayor Thom accepted the check on behalf of the City with thanks. MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Roth, minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meetings held October 19, 1976 and November 2, 1976, and the adjourned regular meeting held October 13, 1976 were approved. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to waive the'reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DE~tA_NDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $560,074.92 in accordance with the 1976-77 Budget were approved. FIRE TRAINING FACILITY GOVERNING BOARD: Noting receipt of a communication from Fire Chief Riley dated~December 27, 1976 requesting that the City Council designate one ~ of their membership to serve on the governing board of the"Anaheim-Garden Grove-Orange. Fire Training Facility Authority", P~yor Thom nominated Council Member Kott to serve in this position. 77-5 City .H~ll, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4. 1977,1:90 P,M. Councilwoman Kaywood indicated her concern since it is imperative that they move ahead quickly that Councilman Kott might not have sufficient time to serve on this authority.~ Councilman Kott indicated he was agreeable to serve in this.capacity. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Kott, the Anaheim City Council designated Council Member Kott to serve on the governing board of the "Anaheim- Garden Grove-Orange Fire Training Facility Authority". To this motion, Councilwoman Kaywood voted "No". MOTION CARRIED. ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT - CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES: On motion by Councilman Roth, Seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council accepted the pro- posal from McDaniel and Associates for consulting engineering services in the amount of $5,400 for alley reconstruction projects under Local Public Works and Capital Investment Program, and authorized the City Attorney to prepare an agreement therefor. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONP~NTAL ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES - AMENDMENT: Mr. Lowry reported on the recom- mended amendments to the City of Anaheim Environmental Assessment Guidelines and forms which were necessitated for continued consistency with the intent and requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act, including recommendation that Council increase EIR filing fees and add a $25.00 filing fee for negative declarations in order to cover the advertising costs for the latter, which, heretofore, were not incurred ~y the City. In response to Councilman Roth, Mr. Lowry explained that these amendments are state mandated, and the $25,00 negative declaration filing fee should cover the additional costs of publication, Councilman Roth stated that he objects to local and city governments4quietly accept- ing, carte blanche, state-mandated regulations which cause additional costs and staff burden at the local level. Councilman Seymour offered Resolution Nos. 77R-1 and 77R-2 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 77R-1: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O¥ ANAHEIM ADOPTING AMENDED GUIDELINES FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970 AS AMENDED JANUARY 1, 1977. RESOLUTION NO. 77R-2: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF ~MAHEIM AMEND- ING RESOLUTION NO. 73P-210 ESTABLISHING FEE SCHEDULES =OR ZONING APPLICATIONS AND APPEkLS. Roll Call Vote: AYES: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Thom NOES: None ABSTAINED: Roth ABSENT: None' The biayor declared Resolution Nos, 77R-1 and 77R-2 duly passed and adopted. 77-6 ~it¥...Hall,..Aoaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ January .4, 1977, 1:30 P~M. ANAHEIM STADIUM FOOD SERVICE: Mr. Tom Liegler reported on the proposed first amendment to the 5-year agreement with Szabo Food Service for total operation of the food and beverage concessions at the Anaheim Stadium. He explained that follow- ing a series of meetings between the California Angels, Szabo Food Service and City staff, the proposed addAndum to the original agreement was prepared and provides,for changes in operation of the Stadium Club only; namely, that the facility be renovated at a cost of $90,000, said sum to be forwarded to the City by the concessionaire and amortized at $10,000 per year from the operations account for the next nine years.. The City would provide $50,000 in funds already accrued through the original agree- ment and set aside for Stadium Club improvements. Samples of materials to be used in the renovation and redecorating project were dis- played, as well as artist's renderings of the completed decor. Both Mr. Havice of Szabo Food Service and Mr. Red Patterson, representing the California Angels, briefly addressed the Council expressing an optimistic outlook for the coming season. Because of concerns pointed out by Councilman Kott that the provision in the agreement calling for the sum set forth to be deposited in a bank having a "main branch" in the City of Anaheim, particularly that this would severely limit the banks eligible to accept this deposit, it was agreed to strike the word "main" from the two places it appears in the subject amendment. Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 77R-3 for adoption authorizing execution of thc amendment with the change set forth above. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO, 77R-3: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROV- ING THE TE~MS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH SZABO FOOD SERVICE, INC. OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO T}~ FOOD SERVICE CONCESSION AT THE ANAHEIM STADIUM. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kay-wood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom None None Tha Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-3 duly passed and adopted. REVISED AGENDA PROCESS: On joint recommendation from the City Manager and City Clerk indicating that following a 90-day trial period, the revised agenda process appears to have accomplished the desired objective of curtailing items being brought to the Council at the last minute , on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded' by Councilwoman Kaywood, the revised agenda process was adopted as Council policy, and the City Clerk authorized to amend Council Policy No. 106 to read as follows: "It is the policy of the City Council that only those items scheduled for Tuesday Council meetings which are in the Office of the City Clerk by 5:00 P.M. the Wednesday preceding said meeting will be considered by the City Council at said meeting. 77-7 Ci~.y H~ll,. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUT~.S -J. anuarv 4. 1977, 1:30 P-M- Public inquiries and requests requiring departmental reports, and Council action, will be scheduled at the earliest meeting after receipt of reports by the City Clerk's Office. Only those departmental items which are in the Office of the City Manager prior to 5:00 P.M. on the Wednesday preceding the Tuesday Council meeting will be .considered by the City Council. It is the policy of the City Council that all future public hearings before the City Council be scheduled at 3:00 P.M. City Council Meetings are scheduled to commence at 1:30 P.M. .In general, Council Agendas are to be structured in the following manner: 1. Call to Order 4. 2. Invocation 5. 3. Pledge of Allegiance 6. 7. Consent Calendar Departmental Reports Requests Public Hearings It is the policy of the Council that the time period of 1:30 to 3:00 shall be held open for Departmental Reports, and that at 3:00, or as promptly thereafter as possible, the Public Hearings will commence. Matters set on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one Roll Call vote provided, however, that when any member of the Council, Staff or Citizen wishes that a matter be heard separately, it may be taken off the Consent Calendar as determined by the City Council. In the event that the City Council determines that any public hearing should be held in the evening, it may set such public hearing for an evening meeting." MOTION CARRIED. AGREEb~NT - CROW/PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 77R-4 for adoption authorizing an agreement with Crow/Pacific Development Corporation regarding reimbursement costs for special water facilities - Tract No. 9313. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 77R-4: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND CROW/PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RE REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR SPECIAL WATER FACILITIES, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSEN%: COUNCIL b~MBERS: COUNCIL P~EMBERS: COUNCIL MEM]~ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-4 duly passed and adopted. 77-8 City Hall, AnaheimL California - COUp. CIL MIN.UTES - January CITY MANAGEb~NT CONFERENCE - JANUARY 7 AND 8, 19.7~: Councilman Seymour stated that he had recently been informed the City Management Seminar scheduled for Thursday, January 6 at the Anaheim Convention Center is to be followed by a department head conference on Friday, J~nuary 7, and Saturday, January 8, which would be conducted outside of the City with overnight accommodations afforded for City employees attend- ing. Councilman Seymour recalled that the City Council of the City of Anaheim has set an example by spending less money for meals, hotels, travel, etc., than any other city council in Orange County, and that this planned seminar would be contrary to the policy of thrift and economy so established. Consequently, he coul~ not condone it unless it is to be held within the City of Anaheim. He made reference to use of the Anaheim Convention Center which has the facilities to accommodate this type of meet- ing. MOTION: Councilman Seymour'thereupon moved that the City Manager be instructed to cancel the reservations at the Kellogg West Education Center in Pomona and not to conduct the two-day City Management Seminar outside of City of Anaheim facilities. Councilman Kott seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Talley responded that he certainly would comply with Council's directive; that this seminar was set forth as a budgeted item in the 1976-77 Budget and has been conducted in the past and, therefore, it was his understanding that this practice was in conformance with Council policy. Mr. Talley pointed out that the cost to the City was for the use of Kellogg West Education Center, which is a State educa- tional facility, and was scheduled in order to disseminate information regarding the budget process to be used in preparation of the 1977-78 Budget. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out the memo of September 1976, which listed these dates, not sudden of secret. CHARTER AMENDMENT: The City Clerk re~orted that pursuant' to Government Code Section- 34464, the certificate of Ratification by Electors of the City of Anaheim of Amendments to the City Charter at the November 2, 1976 election was recorded in Orange County on December 28, 1976; accepted and filed by the Secretary of State on December 27, 1976, becoming effective that date; and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. PAC APPO%NTMENT: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council clarified that Mr. Larry King's ~election to the Project Area Committee at the Council Meeting of December 21, 1976 was to replace Darwin Stockwell, rather than Marguerite Lee, with term ending June 30, 1978. MOTION CARRIED. BICYCLE LANES - NO PARKING ORDINANCE (LINCOLN AVENUE AND SUNKIST STREET): Report · from the Traffic Engineer dated December 28, 1976, recommending that City Ordinance No. 3596 prohibiting parking in bicycle lanes on Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street be retained, was submitted for Council consideration. Adoption of Ordinance No. 3634 was continued to this date from the meeting of December 21, 1976, pending this report. Ordinance 3634, upon adoption, would permit no vehicle parking at any time in marked bicycle lanes. Mr. Singer gave a verbal report on the survey conducted in other communities to determine their parking restrictions in relation to bicycle lanes. It was ascertained~ that there is a multiple mix of parking restrictions ranging from no restrictions at all through daylight restrictions, to no parking at all. Mr. Singer stressed that introducing marked bicycle lanes along City streets asumes an obligation to safety, and that in order to meet the safety standards set forth by the State of California, the lanes should be marked for no parking at any time. He explained the difficulties of introducing bicycle traffic into City streets and the major causes of accidents. 77-9 City Ha%l, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINb~rES -January 4? 1977,, 1:30 P.M-. Mr. Robert R. Heydon, 874 South Sunkist Street (who had previously forwarded corres- pondence to the Council dated December 20, 1976), Mrs. Alyce Whieldon and Mrs. Laura Skile, all Anaheim residents living on Sunkist Street who would be affected by the proposed parking restrictions, were recognized by the Mayog and each addressed their concerns to the Council, chiefly being that they have insufficient room in their, driveways or on their'property fo? parking of ~heir own'and visitors vehicles, and while they are not opposed to the bicycle lanes per se, they do feel that it is unfair to deny residents use of the curbside parking in front of their homes. It was further pointed out that during Little League season the parking p~oblem would be compounded because of the activities in the nearby park. Mr. Robert Cox, (no address given) also indicated he was in favor of bicycle lanes, but not restricted parking. Following discussion between Council Members and the Traffic Engineer, during which he outlined the alternatives open to the Council, Councilman Seymour suggested a compromise position of prohibiting parking on the west side of Sunkist Street only from 7:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. daily, and leaving the lane on the east side of the street as is, thereby allowing the residents to use the east side for parking. At the conclusion of discussion, by general consent, the City Council directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 3596 and an ordinance establishing no parking from 7:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. daily on the west side of Sunkist Street, and retaining Lincoln Avenue east to the Santa Ana Riverbed in a no-parking zone. RECESS: By general consent, the Council recessed for ten minutes. (3:00 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present. (3:10 P.M.) CONTINUED PUBLIC }{EARING - VARIANCE NO. 2860: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the continued public hearing on Variance No. 2860, submitted by Dew Construction Company to permit the outdoor storage of boats on P~(SC) zoned property located at 4640 East La Palma Avenue was further continued to the meeting of January 11, 1977. MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT NO 75-15A: Application of A. Shipkey, Edwin E. Kettler and William O. Corn to abandon Palm Street between Ball Road and Harbor Boulevard was submitted, together with application for exemption status from the requirement to prepare an EIR. (Said matter continued from the meetings of October 12 and November 2, 1976 at the request of the applicants) Report was submitted from the City Engineer dated September 16, 1976 reporting that the project was found to be categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR under the provisions of Section 3.01, Class 5, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirement for an EIR and, further, recommending that said abandonment request be denied. The Mayor asked if the applicants wished to address the Council. 77-10 City Ha.!l,~.Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES.- ~anuarv 4.~.1977, %:30 ¥~M. Mr. William O. Corn, 5162 Princeton Avenue, Westminster, one of the three owners of subject property, reported that they have, over a lengthy period of time, developed a plan for use of their property as a recreational vehicle park and motel. However, the development plans call for the west edge of the property to provide the access street, and it would be difficult to locate driveways on the western edge of the property because of the proximity of Palm Street to the corner of Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road. Closure of Palm Street would allow development of subject property. to a better use. He advised that American Land Title Company will give fee simple title to the property located within the roadway, once abandoned, to the adjacent property owners. They have made agreements with owners of property on Harbor Boulevard, and it is felt that the County's need for access to their Harbor Boulevard facility could be resolved through a land trade. Mr. Art Shipkey, 420 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, stated that he felt the resolution of the County access problem is in the hands of the County and may be resolved, if they would come up with a reasonable plan which is also acceptable to him. However, at this point he is ~ot sure but that what the County wants is more thao he is able or will- ing to give. If an acceptable access solution to the County facility could be worked, out, Mr. Shipkey stated he would then be agreeable to abandonment of his portion of~the property only. Mr. Steve Solyer, representing the County of Orange, indicated that he has discussed the situation with Mr. Shipkey and some ideas were reviewed; however, the County, at this point, does not have a firm alternative for access should the street be abandoned. Mr. Solyer explained that the County building on Harbor and Palm Streets has several different functions, one of them being the wmights and measures calibrat- ing station, to which it is necessary that large trucks gain access. He concluded that the County, as a property owner, should have some guarantee that they would receive the abandoned right-of-way to their facility. The County is not opposed to the abandonment, nor to the project, but wishes to first see their problem resolved. There being no further persons who wished to speak, Mayor Thom closed the public hearing. Following brief Council discussion, on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council continued decision on Abandonment No. 75-15A for a period of 60 days to the Council Meeting of March 1, 1977, to allow time for the property owners to work out a solution to the County's access problem. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARIN~ .- RECLASSIFICATION NO, 76%.77-2 (READVERTISED), .~IR NO, 178, TENTATIVE. TRACT NO. 9425: Application from the estate of Adolph A. Schutte, care of Alan Talt, for a change in zone from RS-A-43,000 to RS-5000 to establish a 106-1ot subdivision on property located at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street was submitted, together with EIR No. 178. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-255, recommended EIR No. 178 be certified as being in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act with the inclusion of some consideration for recreational space and, further, recommended approval of Reclassification No. 76-77-2~Readvertised), subject to the following conditions: 77-11 City Hall, Anaheim, California - CO.UNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977, 1:30 p.oM. 1o That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim. 3. That the property owner(s) shall grant a minimum 30-foot wide ingress and egress easement to the southeast portion of the parcel at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, and said easement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder concurrently with final tract map recordation. 4. That development of subject property shall be in accordance with Council Policy No. 542 pertaining to sound attenuation for residential developments. 5. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 6. That Condition No. 4, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Miss Santalahti reported that it is recommended this public hearing and the next item scheduled on the agenda, a public hearing on Reclassification No. 76-77-29, be considered together, as these actions affect adjacent properties. She briefed the Planning staff report submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission for both Reclassification Nos. 76-77-2 (Readvertised) and 76-77-29. In response to Council questions, Miss Santalahti noted that the property which is the subject of Reclassification No. 76-77-29 has not had a recorded parcel map filed, and is an illegal lot. If the City approved Tract No. 9425 without taking some action on this adjacent parcel, that would create a non-conforming situation. With this in mind, the Planning Commission felt that the adjacent property should be considered at this time and initiated Reclassification No. 76-77-29. Because access to that parcel would be restricted to an easement through Tract No. 9425, a similar land use (RS-5000 dwelling units) was considered appropriate. Although the parcel has been discussed earlier as a potential service station site, Miss Santalahti explained that it is not standard service station size and the establishment of that use would require a conditional use permit. Mayor Thom opened the public hearing on both Reclassification Nos 76-77-2 and 76-77-29. ' Mr. Jim Christensen, 1208 Deerpark, Fullerton, explained, in z'esponse to Councilwoman Kaywood, that the drainage situation has been resolved by a condition imposed upon Tract No. 9425. His firm will participate through reimbursement agreement with the developers of the mob~lehome park as they were the first to proceed and were required to install the drain. (The following portion of the minutes is transcribed verbatim from a tape recording of the meeting,as was later requested by Councilman Seymour, from remarks made by Mr. Christensen.) 77-12~ City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977, 1:30 P.M. "Number two, the lot on the corner, in regards to Mr. Talt's lot, we had produced evidence and given them and submitted them the record wherein they had received certified letters from us, certified letters from the City indicating that there was to be a zone change on his propert~ telling him that it would be now zone changed to RS-5000; that he also recognizes and the City has it on record for years that he has no ingress or no egress to that lot from Ball Road or from Sunkist Avenue. He has been told oveC and over agai~ we have warned him about it and yet he gave authorization for the annexation of this area and the zone change for this particular thing in the general letter to us which we submitted and the attorneys submitted, to the Planning Commission which showed that we did indeed have the right to have that property zoned. We recognize we could not leave that parcel out. We have told Mr. Talt in the very beginning when we bought the property and approached him that there was going to be a problem with it. He has steadfastly said I don't care, I have got my property there and it has been there and it is going to stay there, and we said, well something is going to have to be done with it, it won't just stay there, it will have to be changed and so forth. So finally the Planning Commission did initiate under their own volition, a hearing to change the zone on that. He was duly notified by us, we gave copies to the staff and to the attorney of the notification so he knows all about it, still to this day, has never said anything about it one way or the other." Mr. Paul Singer reported on the proposed location of the bicycle trails within Tract No. 9425 which would be developed'off-street and adjacent to the sidewalk from Ball Road almost to Cerritos Avenue. He commented on the relative safety problems encountered when an off-street bike lane traverses onto a street and that there is difficulty especially with traffic turning right. Councilman Seymour reiterated that the safest possible location for a bicycle lane, notwithstanding the traffic meshing problems at the intersections, is still off-street and removed from the traffic right-of-way, and that this tract provides an excellent opportunity to accomplish this type of bike trail, for at least a portion of the route. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to be heard on either Reclassification No. 76-77-2 (Readvertised) or 76-77-29 and there being no response he declared the public hearing closed. ' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 178 - CERTIFICATION: EIR No, 178, having been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the City Planning'Commission to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environ- mental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such information and belief does hereby certify on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, that EIR No. 178 with the inclusion of some consideration for recreational space is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guide- lines. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Seymour instructed the City Clerk to include in the minutes of this public hearing a verbatim transcript of all comments made by Mr. Christensen re- garding his attempts to contact Mr. Talt. Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 77R-5 for adoption authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Reso- lution Book. 77-13 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 77R-5: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM F!NDINC AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CH,~NGED. (76-77-2 (Readvertised), RS-5000) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-5 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO. 9425: Owner, Estate of A. J. Shutte, c/o Alan Talt; Tract located at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street; containing 106 proposed RS-5000 zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, the proposed subdivision, Tentative Map Tract No. 9425, together with its design and improve- ment was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the City Council approved the tentative map subject to the following conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission: 1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9425 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 76-77-2. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the west property line separating lot Nos. 46 through 65 from Sunkist Street. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall; plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following install- ation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. 6. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 7. That street names shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to approval of a final tract map. 76-14 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977, 1:30 P.M. 8. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 9. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is, satisfactory to the City Engineer. This shall include a storm drain to be constructed in Sunkist Street from Cerritos Avenue northerly to subject tract as required by the City Engineer. 10. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject, to completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim. 11. That the City Council reserves the right to delete or amend the assumption of landscape maintenance in the event Council policy changes. 12. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy. 13. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural framing. ~ 14. That the property owner(s) shall grant a minimum 30-foot wide ingress and egress easement to the southeast portion of the parcel at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street and said easement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and then be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 15. That development of subject property shall be in accordance With Council Policy No. 542 pertaining to sound attenuation for residential projects. To this motion, Councilwoman Kaywood voted "No". MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 76-77-29: Application initiated by the City Planning Commission, for a change in zone from County A1 to City of Anaheim RS-5000 on property located on the southeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street was submitted together with application for negative declaration status from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-256, recommended that subject project be declared exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR and further recommended approval of Reclassification No. 76-77-29, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Sunkist Street and 53 feet in width from the eenterline of the street along Ball Road for street widening purposes. 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road and Sunkist Street including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements such as curb~ and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenent work, shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer ~nd in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Ball Road and Sunkist Street shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance with skandard ~pecifications 77-15 C_j_~)' Hall, Anaheim, Californ[a - COU};CiL MINUTES - January 4, t977~ 1:30 P.M. on file in the Office of the Director of Public Utilities; or that a bond, certificate of deposit,, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of sixty cents (60¢) per front foot along Ball Roa4 and Sunkist Street for tree planting purposes. 4. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 5. That drainage of subject property shall be ~isposed of in a manner satis- factory to the City Engineer. 6. That the owner of subject property shalJ pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreaticn in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 7. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim. 8. That development of subject [roperty shall be in accordance with Council Policy No. 542 pertaining to sound attenuation for residential uses. 9. In the event subject property is to be divided for the purpose of sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map, ~ record the approved division of subject property, be submitted to and approv~ by the City of Anaheim and then be re- corded in the Office of the O~ange County Recorder. 10. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Con- dition No. 7, above-mentioped shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolutiop ~nall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are com~li.ed with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City ]ouncil may grant. 11. That Condition Nom. 1, 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. That Condition Nos. 4, 5 and 8, abov~mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. The public hearing on Reclassification No. 76-77-29 was held jointly with Reclass- ification No. 76-77-2, see previous item for comments. ENVIROX%IENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council finds that this project will have no significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an e~vironmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Se'ymour offered Resolution No. 77R-6 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission, and subject to the conditions set forth by the City Planning Commission. Refer to ResoJution Book. 77-16 City Ha!l~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 77R-6: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING ~YD DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (76-77-29, RS-5000) Roll Call Vote: AyEs: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-6 duly passed and adopted. EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS (DRAINAGE FACILITY FOR TRACT NOS. 7567 AND 926~): The recommendation of the City Attorney, that the City Council adopt a resolu- tion determining the necessity for and directing the acquisition by eminent domain of real property for drainage purposes in the Peralta Hills area adja- cent to Crescent Drive, was submitted together with written request from Mr. Jacque R. Grigry, 5128 East Crescent Drive, Peralta Hills, Anaheim, 92807, be heard on this matter. Mr. Grigry was recognized by the Mayor and stated that he wished a one week postponement of the item due to the fact that he did not have legal counsel with him and his Attorney had some points which he wished to raise. He felt there should be some further negotiations. Mr. John Dawson, special Counsel retained by the City to prosecute the eminent domain action, explained that because of the necessity of installing this storm drain before any sizable rain, the City must initiate eminent domain proceedings on all those properties which have not heretofore been dedicated and furthermore obtain a writ of immediate possession. He remarked that neither of these actions, however, would preclude his ability to conduct additional negotiations with the property owners. The first step he intends to take is to obtain a new appraisal for the property in an attempt to conduct the proceedings on as fair and reasonable a basis as possible. Mr. Grigry remained unconvinced that this rush to install the drain is necessary and basically objected because of the trees which he would lose. Councilwoman Ka~ood pointed out for the record that the City has been involved in acquisition of property for this storm drain for about 6 years now, and the route chosen is the natural water course which makes a great deal of sense. Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 77R-7 for adoption. Refer to Resolu- tion Book. RESOLUTION NO. 77R-7: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF REAL PROPERTY FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES. 77-17 .City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977~ 1:30 Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-7 duly passed and adopted. HILL AND CANYON MUNICIPAL ADVISORY COb~ITTEE: Report to the City Council from the Planning Department dated December 28, 1976, on the establis-hment of the proposed Citizens Advisory Committee was submitted. Following a brief discussion with input by both Mrs. Mary Dinndorf and Mrs. Janice Hall, residents of the Canyon area and members of the Canyon General Planning Task Force, it was deter- mined that the City Council would directly appoint 10 of the members, the remain- ing 5 to be selected from among the officers of established homeowner groups in the Hill and Canyon area. Staff was directed to begin obtaining lists of such officers. Council indicated that they were interested in obtaining a wide geographically based representation on this Committee. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council established the Hill and Canyon Municipal Advisory Committee to be made up of a total of 15 members who are qualified electors of the City of Anaheim, living in the Hill and Canyon area, all of said members to be appointed by the Council, including one ad hoc member from the City Council and one from the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council disbanded the Canyon General Planning Task Force with much appre- ciation for their efforts. MOTION CARRIED. PILOT PAPER RECYCLING PROGRAM: A report on the status of the Pilot Paper Re- cycling Program was submitted for Council information only. Councilwoman Kaywood commented on the correspondence received from the Anaheim Union High School District relative to the City's entrance into this program and stressed that at no time did she, as a supporter of this program,ever have in mind the City's taking away a fund-raising activity from other groups. On the contrarv, her goal and concern is conservation of trees and solid waste disposal. She suggested that groups interested in paper recycling could work together to find a mutually acceptable arrangement for paper collection. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council accepted the report submitted by the Sanitation Inspector and urged that all volunteer groups interested in paper recycling work together with the City's pilot recycling program to resolve the problem of pick up of newspaper for recycling. To this motion, Councilman Roth abstained. Councilman Kott voted "No". MOTION CARRIED. & [ 77-18 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977, 1:30 P.M. CITY-OWNED PROPERTY - 721 NORTH EUCLID: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council continued discussion of City-owned property located at 721 North Euclid, said item to be scheduled for the next available regular meeting, once the appraisal report has been received. MOTION CARRIED. WORK ORDER NO. 875 - SIGNS FOR BICYCLE LANES: Because of the Council's action earlier in this meeting, directing the City Attorney to prepare two revised ordinances governing parking in bicycle lanes, the City Engineer recommended the award of Work Order No. 875 be continued to the meeting of January 11, 1977. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman K6tt, the City Council continued award of Work Order No. 875 to January 11, 1977, as recommended by the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. BID NO. 3146 - PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - PASSENGER VEHICLES: On report and recom- mendation of the Purchasing Agent and Mechanical Maintenance Superintendent, Council- man Seymour moved to accept the quotation from McCoy Ford Company for two 4£door compact sedans in the amount of $9,479.00, including tax, and the quotation of Santa Ana Dodge for one 4-door intermediate sedan and one 4-door station wagon in the amount of $10,220.09, including tax. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. BID NO. 3177 - REPOWERING OF FIRE PUMPER NO. 6616: In response to Councilman Kott'~'-~ question regarding the recommendation to Repower Fire Pumper No. 6616, Fire Chief Riley explained that with this sum of $14,151.18 to repower the pumper which was recently acquired at a cost of $28,000.00, the City will gain a useable fire engine with another 15 years of service, whereas a new unit would cost $86,000.00. On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Kott, the City Council author- ized Repowering of Fire Pumper No. 6616 to diesel by acceptance of the bid from Lawless Detroit Diesel in the amount of $14,151.18, including tax, to perform the conversion. MOTION CARRIED. SOLICITATION PERMIT - AMERICAN NATIONAL VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION: Request of Mr. Robert Harte, American National Volleyball Association, to discuss the denial of their application for solicitation of Charity Funds within the City of Anaheim on November 23, 1976, was continued from the meeting of December 28, 1976, to this date. Mr. Harte, 7201 Garden Grove Boulevard, Garden Grove, Vice President of the American National Volleyball Association, outlined their position and their activities in the County, indicating that they are a major employer of young people; that they are now recruiting to develop Youth Volleyball Leagues and hope to prepare a strong National Volleyball Team. They wish to solicit for the purpose of selling tickets to exhibition volleyball matches, both door to door and by telephone. Both Mayor Thom and Councilwoman Kaywood explained to Mr. Harte that the many complaints received by the Council regarding door-to-door solicitation has led them to deny r&quests for door-to-door solicitation. 77-19 £.ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977, 1:30 P.M. Following discussion, it was ascertained that the American National Volleyball Association is a non-profit corporation, and as such could sell tickets within the City by obtaining a business license. Furthermore, it was noted that the organization would ~lso be eligible for waiver of the business license fee be- cause of its non-profit status. In conclusion, the American National Volleyball Association was directed to proceed in this manner and the Council tool~ no further action on the Solicitation Permit ROOM TAX PENALTY - QUALITY INN: Mr. Harold Berlo, Jr., General Manager of the Quality Inn, 616 Convention Way, addressed the Council to appeal'a tax penalty assessment against their firm in the amount of $6,246.16, as set forth in his communication dated December 17, 1976. Mr. Berlo explained that in June of 1975, the pa>~ent for the previous month was miscalculated, that this was due to clerical error and they acknowledge the tax liability in the amount of $6, 272.99. However, they wish to appeal the penalty assessed against them since this was due to clerical error. There was no intent to defraud and they were unaware of the deficit until the City Auditor uncovered same. At the conclusion of Mr. Berlo's presentation and discussion, Council indicated they would be agreeable to working out some acceptable method of payments for the penalty, however, they would not be agreeable to waiver of the penalty inas- much as it would create precedents which would make it difficult for the City to enforce the Ordinance. On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council denied the request for waiver of penalty imposed on the Quality Inn in accor- dance with Anaheim Municipal Code Section 3.04.210. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1636 - REQUEST FOR REHEARING: On motion by Council- woman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the request submitted by Harry Knisely, Attorney, for a rehearing to consider modification of a condition of approval imposed upon Conditional Use Permit No. 1636, which permitted construction of an 80-unit motel on property located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Easy Way, was denied. To this motion Council Members Seymour and Roth voted "No". MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 2252 - EXTENSION OF TIME: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the request of Josephine B. Lopez for an extension of time to permit a roof sign on property located at 3136 "B" West Lincoln Avenue was approved retroactive to August 27, 1976, and expiring August 27, 1978. MOTION CARRIED. LIBRARY SITE - HILL AND CANYON BRANCH: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council authorized employment of Gunn, Landa, Rose, Uhl and Associates, to conduct a feasibility analysis of the proposed Hill and Canyon Branch Library site in an amount of $10,500.00, as recommended by the Library Board. Councilman Roth abstained from voting on the motion, stating that he had not received sufficient information on the feasibility requirements and was not convinced that the employment of this firm would benefit the project to the extent of the proposed expenditure. MOTION CARRIED. 77-20 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977, 1:20 P.M. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Thom, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda: 1. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claim was ordered denied and referred to the City's self-insurance administrator: a. Claim submitted by Dorothy Savage for damages purportedly sustained as a re- suit of a fall on sidewalk adjacent to the parking lot at Anaheim. Convention Center on or about October 30, 1976. 2. ~SEMENT DEVICES PERMIT: Amusement Devices Permit for Vic Meghrouni's Arcade, 1196 West Katella, to allow approximately 20 arcade pieces, including pong games and pinball machines, was granted in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police (Victor Armen Meghrouni, Applicant). 3. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed: a. Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Resolution urging the State to reject current draft California Transportation Plan - Policy Element. b. City of Garden Grove, Resolution No. 5208-76, establishing an inflation assistance plan for single-family, homeowner-occupied residences. c. City of Livingston, Resolution No. 76-58, regarding the 'illegal alien problem. d. Monthly reports for October, 1976 - Library and for November, 1976, - Library and Treasurer. e. Library Board minutes of June 21, October 18, and November 15, 1976. f. Community Redevelopment Commission minutes of December 15, 1976. RESOLUTION NOS. 77R-8 AND 77R-9: Councilman Kott offered Resolution Nos. 77R-8 and 77R-9 for adoption in accordance with the reports, recommendations and certifi- cations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 77R-8: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Nalco Chemical Co.; Nalco Chemical Co.; Orange County Flood Control District, Harbors, Beaches and Parks; Rafael Ramirez, et ux.; Enriqueta Salazar) RESOLUTION NO. 77R-9; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC Ib~ROVEMENT, TO WIT: EAST STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, 208' N/O TO 158' S/O CRESTBROOK PLACE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 798-B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened January 27, 1977, 2:00 P.M.) 77-21 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4, 1977, 1:~0 P.M Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 77R-8 and 77R-9 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3638: Mr. Jim Webb, representing the Pacific Telephone Company, briefly addressed the Council voicing his concerns regarding th~ potential difficulties which might be presented because of this ordinance to telephone repair trucks while making emergency service calls during the evening hours. Mr. Hopkins replied in response to these concerns that it would appear such situations would be accommodated in the proposed ordinance. Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3638 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 3638: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ~MENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 32, OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 14.32.205 TO RESTRICT HOURS OF PARKING OF COMMERCIAL TYPE VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3638 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3639: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3639 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINkNCE NO. 3639: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-118(6) CL) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEb~ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3639 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3640: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No 3640 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ' ORDINANCE NO. 3640: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3632, NUNC PRO TUNC, RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-44(18) - adds Tract No. 9136) 77-22 .City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 4., 1977, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: COUNCIL M~MBERS: Seymour ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3640 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3641: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3641 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 3641: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-23, CL) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3641 duly passed and adopted. SANTA ANA RIVER/SANTIAGO CREEK GREENBELT: Councilwoman Kaywood, noting that the Parks and Recreation Commission has received copies of the Greenbelt Imple- mentation Plan and are in concurrence with same, as is the City staff, voiced the opinion that since time is of the essence, it would be appropriate for the Council to take an action. On motion by Councilwoman Ka~ood, seconded by Councilman Kott~ the Anaheim City Council approved the Santa Aha River/Santiago Creek Greenbelt Implementation Plan as submitted. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to adjourn. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5:40 P.M. LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK