1977/06/287 7- 7 2 6
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28_, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William T. Hopkins
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon Hoyt
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: Thornton Piersall
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Norm Priest
POLICE CHIEF: Harold Bastrup
PARKS, RECREATION AND ARTS DIRECTOR: James Ruth
STREETS & SANITATION SUPERINTENDENT: William Lewis
ACCOUNTING OFFICER: Ron Leege
ASSISTANT PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: David Hill
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR - ZONING: Annika Santalahti
Mayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Reverend Paul Keller of the First Presbyterian Church gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman William Kott led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
PRESENTATION: The Mayor presented Mr. Leege, Accounting Officer, with a plaque
from the Municipal Finance Officer's Association citing the City's excellence in
financial reporting. Anaheim was amongst the 288 municipalities in the United
States out of 2,231 whose annual financial reports were reviewed and selected
for the award. Mr. Leege accepted on behalf of the City and the Finance Department.
MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Thom, minutes of
the Anaheim City Council regular meetings held April 19 and May 17, 1977 were
approved subject to typographical corrections on the meeting of April 19, 1977.
MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Roth, the May 10, 1977
minutes (page 77-540) were changed to correct a clerical error to accurately
reflect the Planning Commission's recommendations relative to EIR No. 197.
MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading, in full, of all ordinances and resolutions and that consent
ko the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after
reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the read-
ing of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION
UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $548,428.52, in accordance
with the 1976-77 Budget, were approved.
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
77-727
123: TLC VAN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COUNCIL (CDC): City Manager, William Talley, explained that pursuant to the
terms of the June 18, 1977 agreement with the CDC, an amendment was necessary
to provide additional services in the form of maintenance and a driver for one
of the vans in the amount of $1,500, which amount could not be met by the CDC,
thus requiring the City to bear this expense.
Discussion followed between Council and staff relative to the use of the vehicles,
wherein Executive Director of Community Development, Norm Priest, explained
priority use for the vehicles was 1) transportation to nutrition sites under the
TLC program; 2) senior citizen's programs; and 3) other uses. The use did not have
to be confined to the TLC program, but could be used for other senior citizen
groups or other groups in off-hours with expenses to be borne accordingly.
Councilman Roth commented that he had made a visit to the TLC site at the Salvation
Army Headquarters and was very impressed with what he saw. He considered it to be
one of the best uses of federal funds and wholeheartedly endorsed the program.
~rt~e Mayor stressed his concern over ancillary uses of the vans and emphasized he
did not want the TLC program touched or infringed upon in any way. He wanted it
clearly understood that program was a first priority.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 77R-452 for adoption, as recommended
in memorandum dated June 22, ]977 from Executive Director, Norm Priest. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-452: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~'I
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE
COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COI~CIL, INC.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-452 duly passed and adopted.
153: CREATION OF NEW CLASS OF DATA CONTROL ANALYST: Councilman Kott questioned
the City Manager relative to the MDS Program and the need for a supervisor,
as requested in memorandum dated June 22, ].977 from the Personnel Department. He
wanted to know to what extent additions would continue and how they affected the
City's profits.
Mr. Talley explained that the creation of Data Control Analyst as a new class was
deemed necessary from a study made by the Personnel Department regarding duties
and classifications of the City, and it was part of a continuing review by that
Department over all jurisdictions under the City's pay plan. Personnel and AMEA
determined that the duties included more than the present position title encompassed.
Because it was a higher rate of pay, it would reduce the profit that the City was
recovering from MDS. T~e objective of the MDS contract was to provide data
77-728
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
processing services to a number of cities in such a manner that the City could
keep data processing costs at approximately $200,000 less, due to the shar-
ing of a central processing unit, as opposed to owning the computer. The proposal
was a minor decrease in the City's overall costs recovery, but the $200,000 goal
was a realistic one. He was also advised by MDS that they were entirely satis-
fied with the service provided by the City arid were looking to add new cities to
the contract. They would also prefer that the City Council grant policy direction
relative to a long range commitment.
The Mayor stated he had no quarrel with the recommendation of the analyst at the
salary schedule proposed, but did have a personal quarrel with the entire EDP
system. Therefore, he could not support the proposal for that reason. He would
never be satisfied until cost comparisons were obtained to confirm that the City
could perform at less than the private sector. He apologized to the employee
involved, but would not go along with any proposal involving Data Processing until
that exercise was accomplished.
Mr. Talley clarified that the information the Mayor previously requested was agreed
to be provided in fiscal 1977-78. He also confirmed for Councilman Kott that
there would be additional increases or employees in the program; however, with
concurrent increases in the MDS contract to the City, the net effect being a
reduction in Anaheim's expenses and not an increase. Councilman Roth offered
Resolution No. 77R-453 for adoption, as recommended in memorandum dated June 22,
1977 from the Personnel Department. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-453: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76R-680 AND ESTABLISHING THE NEW JOB CLASS OF DATA CONTROL
ANALYST. (effective July 8, 1977)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour and Roth
Kott and Thom
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-453 duly passed and adopted.
153: ADJUSTMENT OF STREET CLEANING SUPERVISOR'S SALARY SCHEDULE: Councilman
Kott asked how the study was initiated relative to the proposed salary adjustment
schedule.
Mr. Talley explained that the audit performed by Arthur Young & Company stipulated
that the City review all classifications within a two-year period. As part of this
continuing review, Personnel studied every job position in the City and in those
instances where the duties and responsibilities were not equitably compensated,
they were now making changes to provide for this compensation.
Assistant Personnel Director Dave Hill stated that the Street Cleaning Supervisor
position had not been reviewed for a number of years. He further explained that
originally the position began as Supervisor of Motor Sweeper Operators but, as a
result of growth, sewer and storm drain cleaning responsibilities had been assigned
77-729
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
to that functional area, along with additional yard equipment and attendant
manpower. It had increased to the point where the street cleaning function at
the Claudina Yard was as responsible as the street maintenance function at tbe
Valley Yard.
Councilman Seymour questioned if it would not be wiser to bring all such cases
together at one time, rather than individually, since appropriate bargaining units
would have to be sought in each case. He questioned why the matter had not become
part of the bargaining function.
Mr. Hill explained that essentially it had become part of the bargaining process,
but the items presented were those the City and employee association believed to
be in the best interest to implement now. Many had not been resolved and those
would appear in the City's demands and also employee organization requests later
in the Summer and into the Fall. The items being brought to the Council, in the
opinion of the Personnel Department, should not wait for the Meet and Confer
process.
Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 77R-454 for adoption, as recommended in
memorandum dated June 22, 1977 from the Personnel Director. Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-454: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76R-734 AND ADJUSTING THE SALARY SCHEDULE OF THE STREET
CLEANING SUPERVISOR. (effective June 24, 1977)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-454 duly passed and adopted.
153: SALARY ADJUSTMENT FOR PARK EQUIPMENT SERVICE WORKER: Councilwoman Kaywood
offered Resolution No. 77R-455 for adoption, as recommended in memorandum dated
June 22, 1977, from the Personnel Director. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-455: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76R-680 AND ESTABLISHING A NEW RATE OF PAY FOR PARK
EQUIPMENT SERVICE WORKER. (effective July 8, 1977)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-455 duly passed and adopted.
174.123: PARTICIPATION IN JUVENILE DIVERSION/TREATMENT PROGRAM WITH GARDEN GROVE
AND STANTON: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 77R-456 for adoption, as
recommended in memorandum dated June 21, 1977, from the Chief of Police. Refer to
Resolution iBook.
77-730
C~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-456: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT DATED MAY 25,
1976, WITH THE CITIES OF GARDEN GROVE AND STANTON RELATING TO PARTICIPATION IN A
JUVENILE DIVERSION/TREATMENT PROGRAM; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (extending term to
September 30, 1977)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COIYNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-456 duly passed and adopted.
123: INCREASING RATES AND EXTENDING TERMS WITH JAYCOX AND ANAHEIM DISPOSAL
COMPANY: Mr. Thornton Piersall, Public Works Director, stated that after an audit
by the Audit Division, he was making a recommendation to increase rates for collec-
tion and disposal of garbage, rubbish and waste material, as outlined in his memoran-
dums dated June 21, 1977, with both Jaycox and Anaheim Disposal Company, and extending
the term of the present agreement with both contractors to June 30, 1982. Coupled
with the Jaycox proposal was a recommendation (Item b) to create a differential
in single- and multiple-family units served by bin service, reflective of an action
tbe Council took some months prior, effective September 1, 1977. ~
Mr. Piersall further stated that, as with the previous contracts, the proposed
amendments were fair and represented continued good service to the customers of
the City of Anaheim.
Mr. Piersall also explained that in concert with the foregoing recommendations,
he was implementing in the program an increase in the commercial sanitation rates.
This action reflected a substantial increase for commercial establishments to
ensure equitable treatment with industrial customers who were being billed directly
by contractors. The increase in commercial would generate revenue to offset the
differential being recommended in the residential rates.
Mr. Piersall explained for Councilman Seymour that the commercial rates, which
were falling behind in terms of equity, were being set within fifty-cents or one
dollar of industrial rates.
Discussion followed between Councilman Seymour and staff wherein it was confirmed
that the proposed recommendation put commercial and industrial customers on the
par, and the benefactor would be the apartment units.
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 77R-457 through 77R-459, both inclusive,
for adoption, as recommended in memorandums dated June 21, 1977, from the Director
of Public Works. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-457: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE,
RUBBISH AND WASTE MATERIAL BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND WARREN W. JAYCOX.
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
77-73]
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-458: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF RUBBISH AND
WASTE MATERIAL BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND C. V. TAORMINA, DBA ANAHEIM DISPOSAL
COMPANY, (now known as ANAHEIM DISPOSAL, INC., a California Corporation).
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-459: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ESTABLISHING SANITATION CHARGES.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 77R-457 through 77R-459, both inclusive duly
passed and adopted. '
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, a policy of provid-
ing differential rates between single- and multiple-family units, effective
September 1, 1977, was approved. MOTION CARRIED.
123: HELTZER ENTERPRISES, AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS, BAXTER
STREET AND LA PALMA AVENUE (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 74-75-23): Councilman Kott offered
Resolution No. 77R-460 for adoption, as recommended in memorandum dated June 21, 1977,
from the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-460: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION COSTS; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Heltzer Enterprises -
Brookvale)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-460 duly passed and adopted.
128 AND 152: INCREASE IN ADVANCE EXPENSE ACCOUNT: In answer to Councilman Kott,
City Manager Talley explained that the intent of the account for advance expenses,
last modified in April, 1968, was to prevent employees from having to advance their
own funds for City costs. At the time, in-town conferences and meetings~were not
included, so presently employees were spending their own money and, subsequently,
requesting expense reimbursement. Also proposed to be included were Vice and
Narcotics expense reimbursements and special purpose advance tuition payments.
Currently, the $2,500 fund was being turned over every ten days. The proposal to
increase the account to $5,000 was intended to cut the work involved in half~
Discussion followed between Council and staff wherein Councilman Kott voiced his
opinion that the $2,500 limit was sufficient, and a hardship would not be created
if an employee had to initially pay for modest within-City expenses and, subse-
quently, be reimbursed accordingly.
77-732
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - J~na 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M._
Mr. Talley thereupon explained the reasons why he considered the proposal to be
more cost effective.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 77R-461 for adoption as recommended in
memorandum dated June 22, 1977 from the City Manager. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-461: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ESTABLISHING A REVOLVING FUND AND AUTHORIZING THE ADVANCE THEREFROM OF FUNDS FOR
EXPENSES FOR CITY PERSONNEL WHO ARE REQUIRED TO BE AWAY FROM THE CITY ON CITY
BUSINESS OR TO ATTEND CONFERENCES, OR TO CONDUCT CITY BUSINESS WITHIN THE CITY;
AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 68R-185.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kott
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-461 duly passed and adopted.
153: LANDSCAPE CLASSIFICATION STUDY: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded
by Councilman Roth, a copy of a letter to the AMEA from the Personnel Director dated
June 20, 1977, implementing the landscape portion of the Classification Study, was
ordered received and filed, as recommended in memorandum dated June 21, 1977 from
the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Talley noted that the anticipated increased cost of the foregoing action would
be $19,932 per year.
123: SELF-INSURANCE LIABILITY PROGRAM, CLAIMS, ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION
AGREEMENT: Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 77R-462 for adoption as recom-
mended in memorandum dated June 22, 1977 from the City Attorney. Refer to Resolu-
tion Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-462: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH CARL WARREN & CO. AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. (term ending
June 30, 1978)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-462 duly passed and adopted.
152 AND 167:
EFFECTIVE DATE FOR CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 214 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL
COST SHARING POLICY: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman
Kott, the effective date of Council Policy No. 214, Traffic Signal Cost Sharing
Policy, adopted by the Council on June 14, 1977 was made effective July 1, 1977,
and all sums collected from developers from June 14, 1977 to present would be
refunded accordingly as recommended in memorandum dated June 27, 1977 from the
City Attorney. MOTION CARRIED.
77-733
City Hall., Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - .June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Hopkins confirmed for Councilwoman Kaywood that no projects submitted prior to
the new policy would be affected by that policy.
105: APPOINTMENTS TO COMMISSIONS, BOARDS AND COMMITTEES: Due to expiration of
terms or vacancies, the City Council made the following appointments to the various
City Commissions, Boards and Committees.
PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Seymour,
appointment of two members to the Project Area Committee expiring June 30, 1978 was
continued one week for consideration of additional names. MOTION CARRIED.
PLANNING COMMISSION: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Kott,
Mr. Paul King was reappointed to the Anaheim City Planning Commission for the ensuing
term ending June 30, 1981o MOTION CARRIED.
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION: Relative to the appointment of a representative
from the City Council to the Park and Recreation Commission, City Attorney Hopkins
stated that in connection with an inquiry, it was noted from previous records that
a conflict existed between the Anaheim Municipal Code (Section 13.04.010) and the
City Charter (Section 902). The Charter stated that members of the Council were
considered to be paid officers of the City. Inasmuch as the appointment to the
Park and Recreation Commission involved a paid officer, he recommended that particular
section of the Code be eliminated and the section pertaining to ex-officio members
be amended to add a member of the City Council. He stressed it was particularly
important with respect to the Maddy Local Appointive List Act because it required
the City Clerk to make a posting, and further recommended that it be corrected to
avoid future problems. He also recommended that the Council direct his office to
eliminate the three-year term limit as no term would be required for ex-officio
members.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Attorney
was directed to amend Section 13.04.010 of the Anaheim Municipal Code to eliminate
the conflict with City Charter Section 902, and to reflect a Council Member as an
ex-officio member, without vote, to the Park and Recreation Commission. Councilman
Kott voted "No". MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, Councilwoman Kaywood
was reappointed ex-officio member to the Park and Recreation Commission, representing
the City Council, for the term ending June 30, 1980, or coincidental to her term
of office. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, Mr. Hal Tolar was
reappointed to the Park and Recreation Commission, representing the Planning Commis-
sion, for the term ending June 30, 1980, or coincidental to his term. MOTION
CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, Jo Ann Barnett,
representing the Anaheim Union High School District, was reappointedto the Park
and Recreation Commission for the term ending June 30, 1980. MOTION CARRIED.
LIBRARY BOARD: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mrs..
Jean McClain was appointed to the Library Board to fill the unexpired term of Amin
David, ending June 30, 1978. MOTION CARRIED.
77-734
City Hall, Anaheim, (',alifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - .June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, Mrs. Elizabeth
Schultz was reappointed to the Library Board for the ensuing term ending June 30,
1981. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Earl Dahl
was reappointed to the Library Board for the ensuing term ending June 30, 1981.
MOTION CARRIED.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: Mayor Thom stated that since Manuel Mendez
was a valuable asset to the City's Community Redevelopment Commission, as well as
a professional architect and Mexican-American, he was interested in replacing
Mr. Mendez, due to his resignation, with another Mexican-American, a professional
engineer and a long time resident of Anaheim, Mr. Rudy Valenzuela.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, Rudy Valenzuela
was appointed to the Community Redevelopment Commission to fill the unexpired
term of Manuel Mendez, ending June 30, 1980. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. James Morris
and Mr. Stewart Moss were reappointed to the Community Redevelopment Commission
for the ensuing terms ending June 30, 1981. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman
Kaywood, Mr. Ken Keesee, Mr. Richard Haynie, and Mr. Dale Stanton were reappointed
to the Public Utilities Board for the ensuing terms ending June 30, 1981. MOTION
CARRIED.
COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman
Seymour, Mrs. Janice Billings was appointed to the Community Services Board to
fill the unexpired term of Esther Unger, ending June 30, 1978. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, Mr. Steve Jimenez
was appointed to the Community Services Board to fill the unexpired term of
Richard Vargas, ending June 30, 1979. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, Mrs. Margaret
Sullivan, Mr. Harry Bayley, and Mrs. Teresa Salas were reappointed to the Community
Services Board for the ensuing terms ending June 30, 1981. MOTION CARRIED.
RESIGNATION - COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded
by Councilman Roth, resignation of Angle Luna from the Community Services Board was
accepted. MOTION CARRIED.
ANAHEIM HOUSING COMMISSION: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Council-
woman Kaywood, Mr. Edward Gardner was reappointed to the Housing Commission (tenant)
for the term ending June 30, 1979, and Mrs. Stella Sandoval was reappointed to the
Housing Commission for the term ending June 30, 1981. MOTION CARRIED.
Relative to'the vacancy on the Housing Commission due to the appointment of Mr.
Robert Linn to the Planning Commission, Councilman Seymour stated that one of the
responsibilities in carrying out the Housing Program was going to necessitate the
77-735
C~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - CObqqCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
rewriting of Building Codes as they were affected in the older neighborhoods. In
essence, this would mean a liberalization of the Codes; while they would assure
safety from hazards of fire and the like, they would not be as stringent as for new
construction. Thus, when rehabilitating older neighborhoods, the necessity to tear
down and build over would be precluded. He, therefore, recommended that Mr. Homer
Wallace, previous Chief Building Inspector for the City being very knowledgeable
pertinent to Building Codes, be appointed to the Housing Commission.
The Mayor stated that while he did not disagree, he was going to recommend, in place
of Mr. Linn, a person who was involved with the Elementary School District as a
Principal, Mr. Robert Gasio. He personally wanted to have that type of representation
on the Commission and considered it to be more critical than the thrust of Councilman
Seymour's recommendation because of prior concerns expressed by Council. Also,
because Mr. Gasio worked for the Anaheim City School District, no problem was
anticipated relative to the time needed to devote to the Commission.
Councilman Roth suggested that since it was the intent of the Council to solicit
applications from the community, that the matter be continued for 10 days to await
receipt of additional applications from which to chose.
It was the Mayor's opinion that ample time had been given to consideration of
appointees and he thereupon moved that Robert Gasio be appointed to the Housing
Commission to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Robert Linn, for the term ending
June 30, 1979. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
139: SB 1081 - LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded
by Councilman Thom, support of SB 1081 was approved providing enabling legislation
to set the location of a Liquified Natural Gas facility in the Oxnard area, pursuant
to the requested report dated ,June 27, 1977 from the Intergovernmental Relations
Office. Councilwoman Kaywood abstained. MOTION CARRIED.
156: AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 909, POLICE DEPARTMENT MICROWAVE RELAY COMMUNICATIONS
TOWER: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 77R-463 for adoption awarding a con-
tract in accordance with the recommendations of the City Engineer. Refer to Resolu-
tion Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-463: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE
BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIP-
MENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND
PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: MICROWAVE RELAY COMMUNICATIONS TOWER, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
WORK ORDER NO. 909. (Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. - $155,855 -
only bidder)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-463 duly passed and adopted.
77-736
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - .lune 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
160: PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT, BID NO. 3249, RE-POWERING OF TWO FIRE PUMPERS: On
motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the low bid of
Carmenita Ford was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $19,348.80,
including tax, as recommended by the Purchasing Agent in his memorandum dated
June 20, 1977. MOTION CARRIED.
160: PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT, BID NO. 3260, STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR YORBA SUBSTATION:
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the low bid of
Coast Iron and Steel Company was accepted and purchased authorized in the amount
of $16,385.48, including tax, as recommended by the Purchasing Agent in his memo-
randum dated .June 20, 1977. MOTION CARRIED.
148: ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded
by Councilman Seymour, reconfirmation of the appointment of William F. Daly as repre-
sentative to the Assembly of Delegates to the Orange County Health Planning Council
was approved. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, reconfirmation
of Patricia Kenworthy as alternate representative to the Assembly of Delegates to
the Orange County Health Planning Council was approved. MOTION CARRIED.
108: REQUEST FOR REFUND OF A PORTION OF BUSINESS LICENSE FEE, FANTASY STUDIOS:
Request submitted by Fantasy Studios for a refund of a portion of business license
fee paid for modeling studio establishment located at 1209 West Lincoln Avenue.
Another communication dated June 23, 1977 was also received requesting refund of
a portion of business license fee paid for public bath and massage establishment
licenses.
Mr. Gene Kloempken, Fantasy Studios, ]209 West Lincoln Avenue, referred to his
letters of June 8 and 23, 1977 requesting a refund of a portion of business license
fees paid for modeling, public bath and massage licenses. Although he was completely
in unison with the Council and the City relative to the $25 regular business license
fee, he considered the three fees on his establishment of $250, $100 and $300, re-
spectively, to be non-applicable and unjustified because license fees were for the
purpose of starting a business and nothing else. That was his reason for protesting
the levying of such fees.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, request of Fantasy
Studios for refund of a portion of business license fees paid for model, public
bath and massage licenses was denied. MOTION CARRIED.
108: ROOM TAX AUDIT, HOWARD WEEKLY CORPORATION AND VILLAGE INN INVESTORS: Request
by Cecil Wright, to discuss room tax audit of Village Inn, 1911 East Center Street,
Casa Cordova, 3360 West Lincoln Avenue, Casa Monterey, 2748 West Lincoln Avenue,
and Casa Valencia, 2630 West Lincoln Avenue.
Mr. Wright, 60 Pleasant Street, Orange, requested a 30-day continuance of the
matter wherein he would use that time to work with staff in connection with
problems he saw in the assessment and, as well, requested a waiver of the fee
for the continuance, if any, in view of the large amount of assessment the City
was requesting.
77-737
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
In answer to Councilman Kott, Miss Santalahti explained that the zoning for the
four parcels of land involved was commercial which would not permit residential
development.
Mr. Bill Erickson, 301 East North Street, spoke as a friend of the Council but
wished to elaborate on the injustice of the Bed Tax penalty as he viewed it. He
explained that since a wholesale change in the City administration had been en-
countered, neither the City Attorney, City Manager or a member of the present
Council was responsible for the original inception of the tax. He maintained that
a miscarriage of justice had been created inasmuch as no other entity in Anaheim
had been encumbered with the same tax. Records also indicated that tremendous
amount of monies were collected yearly and were an important factor in the City's
Fiscal Budget. Mr. Erickson then briefed the Council on monies collected and
penalties assessed from 1972 through 1976 as well as other facts relative to the
Bed Tax. In conclusion, Mr. Erickson stated although he was not speaking for any
organization nor did he know the principles involved in the subject matter, he was
asking for proper deliberation on the fairness of whatever the Council's decision
would be. He also implored the Council to investigate the possibilities of a fair
and just evaluation of the present Bed Tax penalty with a subsequent correction of
the situation.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the request of
Cecil Wright to discuss Room Tax Audit of the Village Inn, Casa Cordova, Casa
Monterey and Casa Valencia was continued to July 26, 1977, subject to a $25
continuance fee. MOTION CARRIED.
105 AND 175: PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD: Recommendations regarding revisions of retail
electric and water rates.
As Secretary of the Public Utilities Board, Utilities Director Gordon Hoyt, briefed
the Council on his extensive report dated June 27, 1977 with attachments, Exbibit
Nos. 1 through 8 (on file in the City Clerk's Office) and outlined the three alterna-
tives proposed: (1) Case III-A (Exhibit 1) Rate Program recommended by the Public
Utilities Board (PUB) -- 7 percent electric rate increase, suspension of monthly
cash transfer from the Electric Utility to the General Fund for Fiscal 1977-78,
suspension of monthly cash transfer in 1977-78 from the Water Utility. (2) Case VI
(Exhibit 2) Rate program recommended to the Board by Mr. Joseph White -- 9 percent
electric rate increase, suspension of monthly cash transfer from the Electric to
the General Fund for Fiscal 1977-78. (3) Case III (Exhibit 3) Rate program recom-
mended to the Board by the Utilities Director -- 6.7 percent electric rate increase
on July 1, 1977 with the need for additional increases August 1 and November 1, 1977,
including transfers to the General Fund from the Electric Utility commencing March 1,
1978 and an automatic fuel cost adjustment (FCA) to adjust rates automatically every
month according to how much the Southern California Edison Company missed its estimate
of the FCA factor that month.
Discussion followed relative to questions posed by Councilwoman Kaywood in which
Mr. Hoyt explained the ramifications of the three proposals on the amount of
revenue each would produce and emphasized that in every case, additional increases
would have to be imposed during the year in order to achieve the revenues necessary
77-738
C~ty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - J~ne 28, 1977~ 1:30 P.M.
to balance the Budget. Mr. Hoyt proceeded to explain the simple Fuel Cost Adjustmen!
modification factor (Exhibit 8) and the program around which it was designed in
order to establish a balanced account with a range of between $200,000 and $700,000.
As long as the amount remained within that range relative to Edison's monthly estimate,
the retail rate could be held the same and no adjustment would have to be made. The
Utilities Department was not trying to excise more money from customers than budgeted,
but it was a device being used to keep the cost of electricity equalized to that on
which the Budget was based. It could be brought back to Council periodically, but
the only problem was time lag.
It was Councilman Seymour's opinion that the proposal would implement automatic
increases with no deliberation and n~ one would be held responsible or accountable
for such action.
Councilman Kott thereupon posed several questions relative to the delay proposed
in transfers to the General Fund as well as inequities in the rates charged between
small commercial users, residential users and industrial users.
Mr. Hoyt first explained that sufficient cash would not be available to make transfers
to the General Fund until approximately March of 1978 since a cash flow problem would
exist until a month or so after the increase would take effect in November, but would
improve greatly by the end of the fiscal year.
Mr. Talley expressed concern tbat under this proposal, if anything came up toward the.._
end of the year and the electric utility could not provide the entire amount, then
the unappropriated reserve would have to be used. If another drought was experience~
or an increase in assessed value or sales tax activity was not realized, those three
major revenue sources would be affected.
Relative to the inequities in rates as expressed by Councilman Kott, Mr. Hoyt personally
agreed and explained that was the thrust of Mr. White's proposal as opposed to across-
the-board increases. He then explained what would occur to the rate of return to the
Utility Department's proposal and stated that if they were able to reduce increases
in any area, they would recommend this reduction for commercial customers in approxi-
mately November; however, that would still be following Southern California Edison's
rates and the rate regulation policy of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). The
small commercials under the PUC rate formula would end up by paying more than their
fair share of rate of return. He wanted that reduced and when they had the oppor-
tunity to reduce rates last December, the reduction occurred in the small commercial
and residential because those were the areas where relief was needed.
Councilman Kott questioned the City Attorney relative to the frequent reference to
the cost of Edison wherever appropriate. He wanted to know the City Attorney's
opinion regarding the Charter Amendment wherein the cost of service was mentioned
relative to electric rates.
Mr. Hopkins indicated that further study would have to be made to ascertain to what
extent it would apply.
77-739
~ity Hall., Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION: Councilman Seymour offered a resolution adopting Case III-A without
any automatic increase and with transfers to the General Fund to commence the
last quarter of the calendar year (October 1977).
Before a vote was taken, Utilities Director Hoyt stated that under the recommended
rate proposal (Case III-A), 'the department would not be able to pay their bills and
additional rate increases would be necessary--23.3 percent more revenue was needed
to support the Budget and his proposal (Case III) was the first step along the way.
He also clarified for Councilman Seymour that the Department's recommendation re-
flected no difference in rates from Edison's, while the Board's recommendation in
the residential class was 5 percent under Edison, small commercial 1 or 2 percent,
and the large commercial/small industrial was 2 percent over Edison rates, down to
equal~of those rates. The very large industrials were slightly less than Edison. He
conceded, however, that the Department could live with any one of the three recom-
mendations proposed as long as it was recognized that additional rate increases
would be periodically instituted. The additional increases, clarified by Mr. Hoyt
for Councilman Seymour, were dependent upon what the PUC would do, whatever would
transpire on negotiations on the price squeeze, and a possible refund from Edison.
Mr. Joseph White, 809 West Broadway, conceded that relative to transfers to the
General Fund, it would be irresponsible to ignore what was going to be approved
in the Budget later in the meeting. If monies were to be transferred, then it
would be more prudent to transfer $200,000 a month and not wait 3 or 4 months
when it would be more difficult to do so. However, one point with which he was
not satisfied relative to transfers to the General Fund, rather than cutting taxes,
he preferred to have them remain the same and instead keep utility rates down since
these could be taken as a tax deduction.
Mr. White then compared the vote on Proposition A with that of Measure E passed
on November 2, 1976, setting rates which went into effect the first of the year.
In his opinion, this measure was being ignored as if it never passed. He then
read aloud excerpts from the Amendment to the Charter (Article XII -- Section 1221)
emphasizing its simple-to-understand language and the mandate it gave to the Council
relative to the establishment of utility rates. It was clear that the Charter stated
everyone was to pay a fair share and, therefore, that was the way it should be. Thus,
his proposal was the only way to proceed. He reiterated, however, that transfer of
funds be voted into the Budget. His proposal should be leveled out to make certain
that rate of return and cost of service was correct. Although it needed more study,
he considered it to be a step in the right direction. He also recommended eliminating
tbe old policy of going by Edison; either the City should run the business or get
out of it.
The Mayor then questioned Mr.. Hoyt and Mr. White as to whether the proposed rate
based on cost of service included a $2,565,000 transfer to the General Fund.
Discussion followed between Mr. Hoyt and the Mayor wherein Mr. Hoyt explained that
sufficient money was not going to be realized from any of the proposals to carry
the Budget; however, they were all in strict accordance with the Charter and any
one of them by the end of the fiscal year with subsequent changes could end up
with equalization of rate of return from the various classes.
77-740
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. %~ite interjected that what Mr. Hoyt meant by subsequent changes were rate
increases throughout the year.
Further Council discussion with Mr. %~ite revolved around the consequences of
his proposal, at the conclusion of which, the Mayor stated he favored Mr. ~]ite's
recommendation because of its attempt to correct inequities rather than across-the-
board increases. He disagreed in a philosophical sense with the inclusion of a
transfer to the General Fund of $2,565,000 as be considered this to be levying of
a tax through the rate structure and at some point he wanted to see that amount
split off and called a tax so the taxpayer could take it as a deduction.
Relative to Measure E t~ which she wrote the opposing argument, Councilwoman Kaywood
maintained the impacts of such a measure should have been known before it was placed
on the ballot because it was of such a comp]ex nat,re, and at the time, the cost was
unknown. She questioned Mr. Hoyt as to whether or not the exact cost of service
had yet been ascertained.
Mr. Hoyt stated that the Marshall and Stevens Study was scheduled to be completed
this month at which time a number would be available that would represent their
~nvestment.
At the request of Councilman Roth, Mr. John Flocken, 1320 Hacienda, President of
the Chamber of Commerce, explained that the Chamber's position supported the actions
of the Public Utilities Board in their reco~nendation that Plan III-A be instituted
at 7 percent across-the-board.
Speaking for the commercial/industrial users, 75 percent of all electricity went to
that segment and if it were not for that consumption, the utility would not be in
such a favorable position. Up until two years ago, the commercial/industrial users
were approached by Edison and the Gas Company to sell gas and electricity to them
and better rates were offered to bring about an increase in their consumption.
That fact fostered the favored rate schedule and the business community could not
be held responsible for any inequities that anyone felt existed within the structure
of those rates.
Speaking for himself, Mr. Flocken strongly supported the idea of the transfer of
funds being called a tax which he considered to be a benefit to all. Homeowners
could deduct their bills from their Federal Income Tax and businessmen could deduct
them as a cost of doing business.
Councilman Kott stated that although he respected Mr. Flocken's opinions, and while
the industrial community was a valuable and necessary asset to Anaheim, be felt
that more of anything that was used in a subsidized fashion, the more expensive
it would be to those who carried it. He was of the opinion that the industrial
community should at least pay for the cost of energy rather than making a profit.
Mr. Flocken concluded that relative to conservation, while water, electricity, gaso-
line and natural gas should be conserved, the capital of the country and the taxpayers'
money should also be conserved both at the local, county, state and national level as~
this too was a resource.
77-741
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARTION - ELECTRICAL RATES: On motion
by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council finds
that this activity will have no significant effect on the environment and is exempt
from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report, as recommended by
the Planning Department. Councilman Kott voted "No". MOTION CARRIED.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION - WATER RATES: On motion by
Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council finds that
this activity will have no significant effect on the environment and is exempt
from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report, as recommended
by the Planning Department. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION: Councilman Thom offered an alternate resolution recommending the
adoption of Case VI, Mr. White's proposal, relative to electrical rates. The
resolution failed to carry by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kott and Thom
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour and Roth
A vote was then taken on the resolution previously proposed by Councilman Seymour
adopting Case III-A with amendments as articulated. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-464: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AMENDING THE RATES, RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC
ENERGY AS ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 71R-478 AND AMENDED BY CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NOS. 73R-25, 73R-373, 73R-531, 74R-75, 74R-630, 75R-243, 75R-344, 75R-345,
76R-41, 76R-377, 76R-528 AND 76R-817.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour and Roth
Kott and Thom
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R~464 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 77R-465 for adoption reaffirming existing
water rates. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-465: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
REAFFIRMING THE EXISTING WATER RATES.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-465 duly passed and adopted.
77-742
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - .June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
RECESS: By general consent, the City Council recessed for five minutes. (3:55 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Council Members being
present with the exception of Councilman Kott. (4:00 P.M.)
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2930: Application by Ray and Estelle Spehar
and Marcia Ann Halligan, to construct a commercial shopping center on CL(SC) and
RM-1200(SC) zoned property located northeast of the intersection of Imperial Highway
and La Palma Avenue, with code waivers of:
a) minimum structural setback
b) minimum landscaping
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC77-99 reported that
the Planning Director has determined that the proposed activity falls within
the definition of Section 3.01, Class 4, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines
to the requirement for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR and, further, recom-
mended that Variance No. 2930 be denied.
The action of the City Planning Commission was appealed by the Applicant and a
public hearing scheduled for .June 7, 1977; public hearing continued from June 7,
1977 at the Applicant's request and a request to withdraw the appeal was filed
by the Agent on June 23, ]_977.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council ratified the determination
of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within the definition
of Section 3.01, Class 4, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for
an environmental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to file an EIR. Councilman Kott Temporarily absent. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, withdrawal of
appeal on Variance No. 2930 by the Applicant was approved and the action of the
Planning Commission sustained. Councilman Kott temporarily absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilman Kott returned to the Council Chamber. (4:02 P.M.)
PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT NO. 76-18A: In accordance with application filed by
Mr. and Mrs. Richard C. Maertz, public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of
a portion of an existing public utility easement to permit a swimming pool to be
constructed at 2428 South Redwood Street, pursuant to Resolution No. 77R-410, duly
published in the Anaheim Bulletin and notices posted in accordance with law.
Report of the City Engineer dated May 27, 1977 was submitted, recommending approval
of the proposed abandonment unconditionally.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no response,
he declared the public hearig closed.
77-743
C__i..t7 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman
Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council ratified the determination
of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within the definition
of Section 3.01, Class 5, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirement for
an environmental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to file an EIR. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 77R-466 for adoption approving Abandonment
No. 76-18A as recommended by the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-466: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT. (Public
Utility Easement 76-18A - 2428 South Redwood Street)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-466 duly passed and adopted.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - 1977-78 PROPOSED GENERAL REVENUE SHARING BUDGET: (con-
tinued from June 14 and 21, 1977) The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak relative
to the proposed General Revenue Sharing Budget.
Ms. Irma Rodriquez, Chairperson, Orange County Human Relations Commission (HRC),
211 West Santa Ana Boulevard, Santa Ana, submitted to Council and read aloud a
communication dated June 28, 1977 (on file in the City Clerk's Office), the main
thrust of which alleged certain deficiencies in the City's Affirmative Action
Program relative to the recruitment of females and minorities. It was also stated
that Anaheim recently received correspondence dated June 6, 1977 from HUD pointing
out areas of non-compliance in the City's Affirmative Action Program as well as the
possibility that the City might face similar compliance reviews from other Federal
funding agencies which provided Anaheim with revenues totaling approximately $9
million.
In answer to Mr. Talley's statement that the letter from HUD was one of thousands
sent out annually on Grant Applications, Mr. James Sanchez, Executive Director for
HRC, emphasized that the communication had more import than a normal request,
especially in the area of Affirmative Action. The point was to make the City
Council aware of the City's standing and that Affirmative Action and equal employ-
ment opportunities did not exist fully in Anaheim and much needed to be done to
work toward implementation.
Further discussion followed, wherein both Ms. Rodriquez and Mr. Sanchez clarified
questions posed by Councilman Kott relative to the matter with regard to qualified
candidates and the procedures and practices which they (HRC) considered to be the
most essential element to Affirmative Action.
City Manager Talley, in answer to Councilman Kott, explained that in recent meetings
with department heads, an enhanced capability in Affirmative Action was recommended,
but the continuing problem revolved around the fact that when the labor force started
77-744
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINI'/I'I.].~ .- June 28, 1977, l:3f) l'.~l.
out unbalanced, promotional opportunities had to be ~:onsidered thus making it
difficult to reach outside. It was an issue which must be addressed an~l overall
efforts would be increased. The letter submitted to the Council in answ(~r to
the referenced June 6, 1977 letter was in connection with the Community Develop-
ment Block Grant Program and Mr. Talley had no doubt that they intended to comply.
He expected that HUD would continue to monitor the City's program, but to indicate
that was anything but common when Federal funds were involved, would be leaving an
incorrect impresssion. He also emphasized that his office was not contacted relative
to the matter wherein he would have provided information regarding the exten(ted
hiring freeze that had taken place in the City, as well as an understandin..~. ,~f the
financial problems under which the City was laboring.
At the conclusion of ft~rther discussion between Co~cil, staff and the rep~'esentatives
of HRC, the Mayor stressed that he did not want Federal funds held up because of
non-compliance. Relative to Councilwoman Kaywood's reference to the Budget message
wherein it was pointed out that recruitment of an Affirmative Action Assistant was
scheduled to begin shortly, the Mayor maintain~d the key was to have a competent
and skilled recruiter, skilled in the recruitment of women and minorities.
In the absence of any other Council comment to the contrary, Mr. Talley accepted
the Mayor's emphasis on recruiting as Council Policy; that would also be the admin-
istration's policy on recruiting efforts. The entire program had to be enforced
all the way through to the final hire of the qualified female or minority applicant.
There being no further persons who wished to speak, the Mayor closed the public
hearing.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the 1977-78 Proposed
General Revenue Sharing Budget was approved. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - 1977-78 PROPOSED RESOURCE ALLOCATION PLAN (BUDGET):
(continued from June 7, 14 and 21, 1977) The Mayor asked if anyone wished to
be heard relative to the proposed Budget.
The City Clerk read into the record a letter dated Jnne 27, 1977 from Mr. Jim
Townsend, Chairman of the Telephone Taxpayers Committee, at the request of Mr.
Townsend, the essence of which supported the proposed "pay-as-you-go" type of
financing for construction of a new City Hall and further urged the Council to
adopt the same methods when considering future capital improvements.
Two additional statements dated June 28, 1977 (on file in the City Clerk's Office)
were read aloud by Mary Dinndorf, 131 La Paz Street, Member of COAL, and Pat
Kenworthy, 824 Ken Way, League of Women Voters.
The COAL statement urged the Council to maintain the City's current tax rate of
95 cents per $100 of assessed evaluation in order not to deprive its citizens of
needed services, as well as capital improvements, and listed four of the main reasons
which were instrumental in COAL's recommendation.
The League's statement addressed itself to property taxes wherein, following a two
year study, they adopted at convention the position that: "The League of Women
Voters of California supports an equitable, broad-based local property tax, easy
and economical to administer, producing adequate revenue, with limitations on the
types of services it finances."
City Hall, Anaheim, Cal£fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - .June 28, ~977, 1:30 P.M.
77-745
Mrs. Eleanor Bay, 2148 West Grayson, explained that she had served on the
Citizen's Capital Improvement Committee (CCIC) and when they first met in May,
1976, were charged with investigating the needs of the City of Anaheim, establish-
ing priorities and finding financing for them. However, the City had no money
for such things. Speaking for the Public Works Subcommittee for the now dissolved
CCIC, she stated the need for capital improvements in that department alone were
appalling and every year's delay brought about added increases in cost. She then
cited the minuscule decrease in her tax bill last year brought about by a lO-cent
cut and pointed out that the proposed 8-cent cut would save 53 cents a month. She
did not want to lose one service or one improvement for such a small decrease and
urged approval of the proposed 1977-78 Budget as submitted.
Mrs. Jan Hall, 545 Tumbleweed Road, stated that the small homeowner and taxpayer
were not in favor of any more tax cuts if such cuts meant a decrease in services.
She had been before the Council several times relative to the need for services
in the Canyon, but was told no money was available to provide needed public works,
traffic lights, police protection or the like. The Cost/Benefit Study in the
Canyon area showed that the Canyon was penalized the greatest in the tax cut
instituted in 1976-77. There were 3,000 more residents in the area this year with
an additional 3,000 expected during the coming year. She was concerned over the
preparedness of the City to serve those people just as residents in the downtown
area and stressed that the time had come to face the responsibility of providing
services equally for all taxpayers, since a tax cut would not accomplish that goal.
After further elaboration on some of the problems experienced in the Canyon due
to the lack of equal services, she urged the Council to accept the Budget as pre-
sented and stop proposing additional tax cuts that would shortchange the residential
taxpayer.
Mr. Joe White, 809 West Broadway, referring to Mr. Townsend's letter previously
read by the City Clerk, stated that he had opposed Mr. Townsend three times since
1961 relative to a City Hall; Mr. White being for, and Mr. Townsend against. Al-
though he (White) had criticized the design of a City Hall, if Mr. Townsend was
now ready to accept the building of a City Hall under any conditions, Mr. White
stressed that ground should be broken and construction begun immediately before
Mr. Townsend changed his mind.
The Mayor asked if any other members of the public wished to speak; there being no
response, he closed the public hearing.
Councilman Seymour, responding to Mrs. Dinndorf, Bay, and Hall, stated that since
1974 the Council had provided two branch libraries, as well as parks, and park land
was continuing to be developed in the Santa Ana Canyon. Relative to a library in
the Canyon area, one would be constructed as soon as the population justified such
construction, which was expected to occur within three to four years.
Relative to capital improvements and $40 million in storm drains which Mrs. Bay
indicated needed to be expended, this undertaking should not be expected to come
from General Tax Revenue, but such projects were normally constructed with bonding
or some type of Federal Grant. The General Fund or property taxes had not been
used for those purposes in the past.
77-746
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - ,lune 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
Relative to reduction in services, Councilman St)ymour explained that what he
suggested would not bring about any reduction in services. To clarify bis point,
he asked Police Chief Bastrup if there was anything in the Budget that would
correct the Police response time to a satisfactory rate in the Canyon.
Police Chief Harold Bastrup first stated that emergency responses in the Canyon
were made within three or four minutes while other types could take as mut'h as
an hour. He confirmed, however, that there was nothing in the proposed Budget
that would improve the situation relative to the amount of money he was proposing
to spend in the 1977-78 Budget.
Councilman Seymour continued that the type of Budget cuts he was recommending had
no effect on lowering of services in staff. He reminded Mrs. Hall that each time
traffic lights were requested in the Canyon, none had been denied by the Council.
Relative to parkway and street maintenance, Thornton Piersall, Public Works Director,
at the request of Councilman Seymour, explained that in the proposed Budget, he had
readjusted a position and added a new sweeper which would bring about better sweeping
service in the Canyon area.
Councilman Seymour was adamant in the fact that he was not convinced that the average
citizen did not want his property tax cut and pointed to the outcry which followed
Budget approval last year, leading to a ]O-cent rate reduction after the Budget was
adopted. He also took issue with the idea espoused by Mr. White, Mrs. Hall and the
Mayor earlier that if a utility rate tax was created, it could be taken as a tax
deduction. He stated that such an assumption was incorrect and invalid since only
businesses were able to do so, not the personal property taxpayer. He agreed that
utility rates and property taxes should be separated and that was the intent when
he proposed Ballot Measure E. He maintained that if the Council had the courage
to trim the proposed budget, they could achieve a significant property tax reduction.
He reiterated his previously proposed concept whereby no more property tax dollars
would be taken this year than last and, further, that the Council consider a policy
in the future that those tax dollars only be allowed to be increased based upon the
cost of living index, as well as population growth within the City. To achieve the
initial objective of taking no more tax dollars, he referred to the submitted list
which he requested of the City Manager, "Suggested Property Tax Reduction Areas."
There were certain significant items, however, which he felt should remain in the
Budget. Councilman Seymour had already ascertained in his analysis that 3 out of 4
of the items mentioned by Mrs. Dinndorf should not be eliminated. The items he did
not want to be reduced were as follows: (1) miscellaneous police capital equip-
ment; (2) Fire Department overtime; (3) Police Department capital equipment; (4)
electrical inspection/construction inspection; (5) employee benefits services
program; (6) employee relations program; (7) library film account and (8) Brookhurst
Community Building equipment.
He also recommended eliminating the City newsletter in order to be able to enjoy
other things in the Budget which, in his opinion, seemed to be critical. Also, if
for some reason the increase in the assessed valuation should be 5 percent instead
of the predicted possibile 16 percent, then the applicable tax rate would be
applied. If 16 percent, however, the tax rate would be 85 cents if his motion
carried. If it was a 20 percent increase, then he suggested an even further re-
duction.
~ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
77-747
MOTION: Councilman Seymour moved to approve the proposed 1977-78 Budget eliminating
those items as suggested in the list he requested from the City Manager, excluding
the seven foregoing items.
Before any action was taken on the motion, Councilwoman Kaywood contended that the
City needed more funds to operate with, not the expedient political move of cutting
taxes, and emphasized that the present 95-cent rate was fourth lowest in the County.
She then stated some figures she worked out on what the proposed reduction would
amount to relative to a $40,000 to $100,000 home. On a $40,000 home, the 93-cent
tax rate as proposed in the Budget would save a total of only 14 cents a month, and
on an 85-cent rate as proposed by Councilman Seymour, 69 cents a month. These
pennies, however, amounted to very big dollars for businessme~ but nothing that
made sense when talking about homeowners, many of whom were on a fixed or low income.
She explained that all year long she heard the concern over police protection not
being provided in the City and the cost to restore six additional officers was
approximately $137,800. Mr. Talley interjected that this amount would be for six
additional patrol officers the Police Chief could use in high crime rate areas
working as a team, including necessary equipment. Councilwoman Kaywood stressed
that prevention would be wiser and cheaper than the subsequent cure and she con-
sidered this to be a very valid item to restore in the Budget.
Relative to Affirmative Action and the testimony previously given that the City
could stand to lose $9 million, Councilwoman Kaywood stated, in her opinion, the
$25,000 directed toward this program was a very vital expenditure.
Councilwoman Kaywood then verbalized her additional concerns: (1) conversion of
street lights to mercury vapor, an item eliminated from last year's budget; cost
would have been $50,000, this year $52,100 for a fewer number of conversions.
Also, a savings of 25 percent in wattage per unit could be realized, thus saving
more energy. Therefore, in reality the cut was more expensive. The longer items
were deferred and postponed, the higher the costs.
(2) Reserves--it appeared the City had an approximate one-month reserve. If so,
what effect would that have relative to the City's bond rating and, as well, if
no transfers were made from Utilities to the General Fund for a half-year, what
effect would that have on the interest rate charged the City?
(3) An allocation of $100,000 for the Economic Development Program would be
inconsistent with reducing expenses and services, as industry looks for amenities.
(4) Concern over department heads and their employees because of the work load
as a result of the hiring freeze.
(5) Concern over employees who work in the City Hall building because of the unsafe
working conditions borne out by two structural analyses.
(6) The effect a lower property tax rate would have on the City's Revenue Sharing
Program.
(7) Credibility of the City applyJ_ng for grants considering its low unemployment
figures. A cut in the tax rate inferred the City did not need the funds. Thus,
she was concerned over the resultant effect this might have since the City benefitted
greatly from these funds in the past year,especially in the Parks and Recreat!on
Program.
77-748
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
(8) Resultant effect of a tax cut on the tax increment for redevelopment.
(9) There was no contingency for emergencies.
(10) Fire fighters were reduced by three positions, yet one fire station was
added, along with an expensive paramedics program.
(11) Preventive street maintenance was not b~,ing performed at an acceptable level;
no longer performing preventive maintenance [t~ utilities.
Councilwoman Kaywood also stated that she would be in favor of four issues of the
newsletter during the year as a communication device between the City and the
citizenry, not as a political expediency, and with all five Council Members in
accord on the format and content.
In concluding, Councilwoman Kaywood agreed with Councilman Seymour that the City
had a fine record and one of which they could be proud. She wanted to see it
continue as a number-one City, and not relegated to second-class status.
Councilman Roth stated that, in general, he supported the Budget as proposed at
the 93 cent tax rate. He felt, however, that the 16 percent increase in assessed
valuation might be low and the City should adjust accordingly. Although he
was a strong supporter in reduction in property taxes, he was accepting the Budget
as proposed for two reasons: (1) a City Hall was badly needed and had to be built
on the proposed pay-as-you-go basis; (2) relative to the long discussion on utilities
and attendant costs, there was too much uncertainty regarding additional transfers of
Utility funds to the General Fund. Thus, he did not want to regress and put the
City in a bind, financially.
Councilman Roth concluded that the average homeowner in the City of Anaheim was
gleaning a great amount of services and value for a nominal expenditure in property
taxes although they perhaps were not aware that only approximately 10 percent of
those taxes were actually going to the City. He reiterated his support of the
proposed Budget at the 93-cent tax rate.
Councilman Kott concurred with Councilwoman Kaywood and Councilman Roth and con-
sidered the Budget to be a good program. The only item pending, however, was the
finalization of the Visitor and Convention Bureau (V & C) Budget, and he wanted
that portion continued for a week or more since another meeting was scheduled with
the V & C for Tuesday, July 5, 1977 to discuss and confirm their needs. He stated
that the 93-cent tax rate was most acceptable and considered it to be realistic.
Mayor Thom was highly supportive of the proposed Budget at the 93-cent tax rate.
He stated he was proud of the track record established since 1974 and the "belt
tightening" procedure instituted in the past two years which, in his opinion, had
been extremely beneficial and a desperately needed exercise for the City to have
experienced; i.e., the position freeze on new hires and the tax reduction last year.
He had supported those moves vigorously and if he had to go through the same pro-
cedures again at the same points in time, he would support them in the same way.
Although he would like to see a reduction in property taxes again, he did not feel
that such a reduction would be significant or meaningful to the average Anaheim
citizen.
77-749
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
Relative to positions for the coming fiscal year, they were not increasing
significantly although he felt there should be upward movement because posi-
tions were needed to upgrade service in areas where complaints had been re-
ceived, particularly in law enforcement although there were other areas. He
conceded, however, that even if service was quadrupled, the City would perhaps
still get complaints.
Relative to the new Management by Objectives (MBO) Program for the coming year,
he viewed the Budget document as a step in that direction. Although he did not
completely endorse the document itself, the administration needed it as a step
to install an MBO goal in the City. He was viewing it in the light of waiting
to see how the Resource Allocation Plan correlated with the MBO objective in
order to bring about more efficiency. He reiterated his support of the Budget
as proposed with the verbalized and articulated corrections in the Budget message.
He agreed with Councilman Kott relative to the V & C allocation in postponing
that portion until there was an opportunity to discuss their defined program with
them.
Tbe Mayor stated that since there was no second to Councilman Seymour's motion
to adopt the proposed Budget eliminating those items furnished in the list he
requested of the City Manager reducing the property tax rate, a new motion was
necessary.
Councilman Roth thereupon moved to adopt the 1977-78 Resource Allocation Plan
as proposed, with a 93-cent tax rate. Councilman Kott seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken, it was confirmed that the V & C Budget allocation
could be set at a later date.
City Manager Talley indicated there were a number of actions the Council should
take in connection with adoption of the Budget and referred first to the list of
Summary of Changes to the Resource Allocation Plan (on file in the City Clerk's
Office) additional copies of which he provided to the Council in order to be
certain the list included the actions the Council wanted to include. The final
actions would then be to authorize or ratify actions previously taken on current
salaries which extended some departments over their budget as well as allowing a
transfer of $200,000 to make liability insurance payments. He asked that the items
on the list as follows be included in the motion made by Councilman Roth:
PROGRAM NAME
Community Promotion (Funds to be set aside but no
document provided covering disbursement
until finalized with V & C.)
DOLLAR CHANGE
$18,622
Intergovernmental Relations
$14,017
Public Information (4 issues of newsletter or similar
document) $25,000
Legal Administration
$24,500
Elections/Annexations
($54 ,ll5)
77-750
_City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCII. MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
PROGRAM NAME
City Treasury
Mail & Delivery Services
Building Processing & Regulation
Construction Inspection
Library Administration
Canyon Brancb Library Construction
Traffic Safety - Enforcement, Inspection, Regulation
($28,000 for crossing guards, which was the only new
DOLLAR CHANGE
$95,000
$ 5,000
$28,992
$23,321
$25,000
$10,000
Microwave Relay Tower
Community Services
Street Cleaning
Solid Waste Disposal
Stadium Maintenance
Miller Golf Driving Range
1963 Municipal Improvement "B"
Information System Processing
Utility Dispatching
Redevelopment
Housing Assistance
TOTAL
item on the list, and $3,000 for portable truck scales)S31,000
$115,855
$20,000
$22,774
$1Ol,8OO
$70,000
$40,000
$415
$2,500
$11,961
$21,100
$12,600
$705,342
A vote was taken on the foregoing motion which included the items delineated
above at a 93-cent tax rate and carried by the following vote.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour
MOTION CARRIED.
77-751
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Talley stated that included in revenues was an approximate 21 percent increase
in electric light and power rates. However, Council prerogative during the year
would determine whether or not those rates would be in effect. No water rate
sales were included although there was a 10 percent increase in the preliminary
budget which would be adjusted back to no rate increase.
Mr. Talley pointed out that on golf green fees, there was an approximate 12.5
percent increase. Although no resolution would be presented, he wanted the
Council to be aware that revenues also included that amount. Approved earlier
in the meeting were residential and commercial sanitation rates. Also for clarifi-
cation purposes, Mr. Talley explained that the Budget also included new agreements
between the City and the Redevelopment Agency and Housing Authority for full re-
covery of costs, which revenues were in the Budget, and resolutions would be presented
at a later date.
Mr. Talley then prefaced the proposal of five resolutions with correlating statements
for informational purposes.
Resolution 1, 2 and 3, each proposed the establishment of new job classifications.
He noted the Intergovernmental Relations Coordinator was a title change only, to
Intergovernmental Relations Manager which was more descriptive of the position, and
Affirmative Action Coordinator title to Affirmative Action Outreach Recruiter.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution Nos. 77R-467 through 77R-469, both inclusive,
for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-467: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ESTABLISHING NEW JOB CLASSIFICATIONS AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76R-682.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-468: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ESTABLISHING NEW JOB CLASSIFICATIONS AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76R-736.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-469: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ESTABLISHING NEW JOB CLASSIFICATIONS AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76R-312.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 77R-467 through 77R-469, both inclusive, duly
passed and adopted.
Resolution 4 was proposed to replace the City's Science Advisor Program, consisting
of a one-year agreement for developing certain Data Processing Services and other
technical services to the Library and the Police Departments. Mr. Talley confirmed
for Councilman Kott that the contract for the City's present Science Advisor would
not be renewed.
Councilman Kott questioned the proposed agreement which would cost approximately
$50,000. It was his opinion the department heads should know what they needed
without the necessity of a study.
77-752
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Talley first explained approximately $10,000 of the needed funds would (~ome
from the National Scien~'e Foundation. He further explained that the five-year
Data Processing program previously presented to the Council was analyzed and
some of the areas where long-range planning was in order were identified. These
areas needed to be developed whether or not inside or outside Data Processing
services were utilized.
Further discussion followed wherein Assistant City Manager, William Hopkins, ex-
plained that although the departments knew what their needs were, they needed
assistance not available in-house, just as when plans and specifications are
needed to be developed before going out to bid on a particular item. He further
explained that although the departments had previously initiated such a program,
no specific analysis was conducted as to exactly what would be involved in the
total program.
The Mayor reiterated his previous opposition on similar items involving Data Pro-
cessing and stated he could not support the proposed resolution.
Mr. Talley stated that the proposal represented a $6,400 decrease and would provide
services that were required.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 77R-470 for adoption. Refer to Resolu-
tion Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-470: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH C. DON MC GREGOR FOR DATA
PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour and Roth
Kott and Thom
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-470 duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 5 required an expression of Council Policy on the ability to provide
greater latitude in the administration and use of traffic controls as well as cross-
ing guards and, as previously explained, the net effect increased the Budget by
$28,000 which was included in the prior motion on the Budget.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 77R-471 for adoption. Refer to Resolu-
tion Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-471: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 6773.
Roll Cal. 1 Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COLrNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-471 duly passed and adopted.
77-753
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ 1977~ 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Talley stated that the final two actions were merely for ratification and
informal recognition purposes.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, appropriation
of $200,000 for the City's General Liability Insurance Binder with Continental
Insurance Brokers as recommended in memorandum dated June 22, 1977 from the
City Manager was ratified. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Roth, appropriation of
$796,400 from the General Fund Unappropriated Reserve to various other accounts
as listed in memorandum dated June 28, 1977 from the City Manager was approved.
MOTION CARRIED.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman
Kott, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and
recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
Calendar Agenda:
1. 118: CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred
to the City's insurance carrier or the self-insurance administrator:
a. Claim submitted by Dorothy J. Mercer for personal injuries purportedly sustained
as a result of a slip and fall accident in the public restroom of the Anaheim
Municipal Golf Course on or about May 16, 1977.
b. Claim submitted by Diana Turner for property damages purportedly sustained as
a result of a tree branch striking vehicle on or about May 9, 1977.
c. Claim submitted by Douglas M. Walters for personal injuries purportedly sustained
as a result of actions by Anaheim Police Officers on or about March 24, 1977.
d. Claim submitted by Thomas Pearson III for personal injuries purportedly sus-
tained as a result of actions by the crossing guard at Gilbert and Orange on or
about May 24, 1977.
e. Claim submitted by Robert S. Prager for property damages purportedly sustained
as a result of a traffic accident caused by the City's signal lights on or about
May 21, 1977.
f. Claim submitted by Southern California Gas Company for property damages
purportedly sustained during removal of a stump by City equipment on or about
May 27, 1977.
g. Claim submitted by Tony Baca for personal injuries purportedly sustained as
a result of tripping on a sidewalk at or near 121 South Anaheim Boulevard on or
about April 11, 1977.
h. Claim submitted by D. B. Investments for property damages purportedly sus-
tained by a City-owned vehicle on or about May 18, 1977.
77-754
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed:
a. 175: Monthly reports for January, February and March, 1977 and seconded
revision of August through December 1976 - Customer Service Division.
b. 105: Public Utilities Board - Minutes of May 5, 19 and 26, 1977.
c. 105: HACMAC - Minutes of June 7, 1977.
d. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission - Minutes of June 15, 1977.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOS. 77R-472 THROUGH 77R-476: Councilman Kott offered Resolution Nos.
77R-472 through 77R-476, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with the reports,
recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member and as listed on
the Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-472: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Donald R. Bates; Richard
A. Herman II, et ux.; Anaheim National Bank; Patrick L. Daniel, et ux.; Atlantic
Richfield Company; Richard J. Broderick, et ux.; V. I. Hotel Corp.; Edith B. Risner)
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-473: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC-
TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: ORANGETHORPE PARK STREET
IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 810-A; APPROVING THE DESIGNS
PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF;
AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids
to be opened July 21, 1977, 2:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-474: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC-
TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: SEWER LINE INSTALLATION,
N/O LINCOLN, BETWEEN EMILY AND CLAUDINA, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO.
1711; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF. (Bids to be opened July 14, 1977, 2:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-475: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Ai~AHEIM
FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES,
MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: PHASE I DEVELOPMENT FOR CANYON SITE #1, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 882. (Goodman & Peloquin, Inc.)
77-755
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977~ 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-476: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN TWO ADJACENT PARCELS PURSUANT TO LOT
LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT MARKED EXHIBIT "A" AND ATTACHED HERETO ON BAYLESS STREET
AND KATELLA AVENUE.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 77R-472 through 77R-476, both inclusive, duly
passed and adopted.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: The following actions taken by the City Planning
Commission at their meeting held June 6, 1977, pertaining to the following
applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration.
On motion by Councilman Kott, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council
authorized the actions pertaining to the following environmental impact require-
ments as recommended by the City Planning Commission and took no further action
on the following applications (Item Nos. 1 tbrough 11):
1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS: The City Planning
Commission recommends to the City Council that the subject projects in the
following listed zoning applications be declared exempt from the requirement
to prepare an Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act:
Conditional Use Permit No. 1712 Conditional Use Permit No. 1713
Variance No. 2942
2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: The Planning Director
has determined that the proposed activities in the following listed zoning appli-
cations fall within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1 and 14, of the City
of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and
are, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR:
Conditional Use Permit No. 1711
Variance No. 2943
3. VARIANCE NO. 2942: Submitted by Julius C. Molina, to permit an existing
illegal triplex on RS-7200 zoned property located at 321 West Vermont Avenue
with certain code waivers.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-121 granted Variance No. 2942 in
part.
4. VARIANCE NO. 2943: Submitted by Michael T. and Jeralynn J. De Frank, to
expand a single-family residence on CL zoned property located at 3347 West Ball
Road with code waiver of prohibited non-conforming structural expansion.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-122 granted Variance No. 2943.
77-756
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIl. MINUTES - .June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1711: Submitted by Ana-Park, Inc., to expand a
private school on M1 zoned property located at the southeast corner of Mable
Street and Loara Street.
City Planning Commissiot~ Resolution No. PC77-123 granted Conditional Use Permit
No. 1711.
6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1712: Submitted by Dunn Properties, to permit a
recreational facility on proposed CL zoned property located at the southeast side
of Woodland Drive, west of Magnolia Avenue.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-124 granted Conditional Use Permit
No. 1712.
7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1713: Submitted by Lana Corporation, to permit an
outdoor storage facility for recreational vehicles, boats, trailers, etc., on a
temporary basis, on CL zoned property located on the south side of La Palma Avenue,
west of Harbor Boulevard with certain code waivers.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-119 denied Conditional Use Permit
No. 1713.
8. VARIANCE NO. 2599 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Kenneth Keesee for an
extension of time to Variance No. 2599 to establish an automobile leasing agency
with code waiver of permitted uses on ML zoned property located at 1922-1930
South Anaheim Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission granted a two-year extension of time to Variance No.
2599, retroactive to May 13, 1977, to expire May 13, 1979.
9. VARIANCE NO. 2800 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Robert and Elizabeth
De John, for an extension of time to Variance No. 2800 to permit an ex~sting
garage conversion with code waiver of minimum number of enclosed parking spaces
on RS-7200 zoned property located at 2823 Alden Place.
The City Planning Commission granted a one-year extension of time to Variance No.
2800, retroactive to May 10, 1977, to expire May 10, 1978.
10. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1225 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Joan
Hamilton for an extension of time for a child care center in an apartment
complex on RM-1200 zoned property located at 2130 West Crescent Avenue.
The City Planning Commission approved a five year extension of time to Conditional
Use Permit No. 1225, retroactive to April 20, 1977, to expire April 20, 1982.
11. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1545 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Dr. Robert
E. Grosse, for an extension of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 1545 to construct
a veterinary hospital with certain code waivers on proposed CL(SC) zoned property
located on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, west of Fairmont Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission approved a two-year extension of time to Conditional
Use Permit No. 1545, retroactive to June 23, 1976, to expire June 23, 1978.
MOTION CARRIED.
77-757
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
VARIANCE NO. 2485 - REQUEST FOR TERMINATION: Submitted by James E. Hundley,
to terminate Variance No. 2485 to permit a mini-warehouse with certain code
waivers on ML zoned property located northwest of the intersection of the
Orange and Riverside Freeways.
Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 77R-477 for adoption terminating Variance
No. 2485 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-477: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 2485 AND DECLARING
RESOLUTION NO. PC73-65 NULL AND VOID.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-477 duly passed and adopted.
VARIANCE NO. 2525 - REQUEST FOR TERMINATION: Submitted by H. K. Fender, to
terminate Variance No. 2525 to establish a mini-warehouse with waiver of
minimum required number of parking spaces on ML zoned property located on
the east side of Brookhurst Street, north of Crescent Avenue.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 77R-478 for adoption terminating
Variance No. 2525 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-478: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 2525 AND DECLARING
RESOLUTION NO. PC73-158 NULL AND VOID.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-478 duly passed and adopted.
VARIANCE NO. 2926, TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9721 AND EIR NO. 198: Submitted by Jawfing
Investments, for a 45-1ot, 44-unit, RS-HS-22,000 subdivision on property located
on the northeast and southwest sides of Fairmont Boulevard, south of Santa Ana Canyon
Road, with code waiver of requirement that all lots rear on an arterial highway.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC77-115, having considered
EIR No. 198 for the proposed development of 44-lots on the 25.1 acres located approxi-
mately 2,050 feet south of the centerline of Santa Ana Canyon Road finds that (a)
potential project-generated individual and cummulative adverse impacts have been re-
duced to an insignificant level due to the equestrian-type estates and, (b) the sub-
Ject EIR conforms to the City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environ-
mental Quality Act, recommends to the City Council that they certify said EIR No.
198 as being in compliance with said Environmental Quality Act, and further, approved
Variance No. 2926.
77-758
_City Ha_ll~ Anaheim, ~]alifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
Miss Santalahti interjected that the developer had submitted a further revision
of the Tract Map beyond that which was presented to HACMAC; however, involving
the same number of lots. HACMAC indicated there were several streets w~th ]3
percent grades, and the Fire Chief had recommended less than 13 percent maximum,
12 percent for short runs. The revised map complied with Fire Department recom-
mendations, and they approved the additional revision today.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked if there was any way to reduce the grading without the
necessity for another hearing.
Mr. Rick King of Ron Martin Associates, representing Boulevard Development explained
that after the previous meeting they again met with HACMAC and submitted a revised
plan with what they understood were HACMAC's concerns, basically lot frontage of
90-foot minimum which they gave and retention of as many trees as possible which
they were trying to do. The proposal was finally endorsed but some members voted
with reservations citing the need for Fire Department review. They looked at the
possibility of additional grading, but instead came up with some interesting con-
cepts in terms of planning using retaining walls rather than cutting slopes even
though this involved additional expense to the developer. As a consequence, they
approximately balanced the grading by increasing the fill and decreasing some of
the slopes. The majority of the site was 4 percent with 12 percent on short runs.
In his opinion, the change did not necessitate going back for a revised EIR. All
roads were down to a maximum grade of 12 percent and that was only in a couple of
sections. Subsequently, the Fire Department approved their revisions and they had
now complied with all recommendations.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CERTIFICATION: EIR No. 198 having been reviewed by
the City staff and recommended by the City Planning Commission to be in compliance
with City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality
Act, the City Council acting upon such information and belief does hereby certify,
on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, that EIR No. 198
is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City and State
Guidelines. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the proposed
subdivision, Tentative Map, Tract No. 9721, together with its design and improvement
was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan, and the City Council approved
said Tentative Map, subject to the petitioner eliminating one lot, specifically lot
line between Lots 11 and 12, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9721 is granted subject to the
approval of Reclassification No. 72-73-51.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each
subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval.
3. ~at in accordance with City Council policy, an open decorative wall shall be
constructed at the top of slope near the northeast property line on Lot Nos. 1 and
44, said wall separating portions of said lots and Fairmont Boulevard. Reasonable .....
landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented
portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall; plans for
said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent
of Parkway Maintenance; and following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim
shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping.
~ity Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28~ .!977~ 1:30 P.M.
77-759
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved
by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
6. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted
to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of
the final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and
restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
7. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the City
Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of
the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the articles of incorporation,
bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to insure maintenance of common
property and buildings, and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to
protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project.
8. That street names shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to
approval of a final tract map.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees, as determined to be appropriate by
the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
10. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to
the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site sufficient grading is
required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading will be permitted
between October 15th and April 15th unless all required off-site drainage facilities
have been installed and are operative. Positive assurance shall be provided the
City that such drainage facilities will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary
right-of-way for off-site drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or
the City Council shall have initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs
of which shall be borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading
operations. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient
to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties through said property
to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be functional
throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the property to the ultimate
point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final building inspections or occupancy
permits. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the
developers of said property upon their request.
11. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be con-
ducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from
this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from
or flowing through this project.
12. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary street name
signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
13. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay appropriate drainage assessment
fees to the City of Anaheim as determined by the City Engineer prior to approval of
a final tract map.
77-760
C__ity H~all,_Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - .lune 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
14. That final specific plot, floor and elew~tion plans shall be submitted to the
Planning Commission and/or C~ty Council for review and approval, prior to the
issuance of building permits.
15. In accordance with the requirements of Section 18.02.047 pertaining to the
initial sale of residential homes in the City of Anaheim Planning Area "B", the
seller shall provide each buyer with written information concerning the Anaheim
General Plan and the existing zoning within 300 feet of the boundaries of subject
tract.
16. That the petitioner eliminates one lot, specifically, the lot line between
Lot~ i1 and 12.
MOTION CARRIED.
FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 9524: Developer, Sunburst Development; Tract located north
of Canyon Rim Road and Via Arboles, west of Fairmont Boulevard containing 40
RS-HS-22,000 proposed zoned lots.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Kott, the proposed subdivision,
together with its design and improvement, was found to be consistent with the City's
General Plan, and the City Council approved Final Map, Tract No. 9524, subject to
two conditions, as recommended by the City Engineer in his memorandum dated June 22,
1977. Councilman Seymour abstained. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 77R-479 for adoption. Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-479: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACCEPTING AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION MADE TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IN
CONNECTION WITH TRACT NO. 8456.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-479 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Seymour explained that he abstained as he did on previous occasions
due to a potential conflict of interest.
172: ORDINANCE NO. 3727: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3727 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3727: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING TITLE 14,
CHAPTER 14.48 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING A NEW TITLE 14,
CHAPTER 14.48 IN ITS PLACE AND STEAD. (through truck routes)
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
77-761
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3727 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3728: Councilman Kott offered Ordinance No. 3728 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3728: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (76-77-7, RM-1200)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3728 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3729: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 3729 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3729: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIMMUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (76-77-39, CL)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3729 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3730: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3730 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3730: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (76-77-25, RS-7200)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3730 duly passed and adopted.
77-762
~ity Hall_n_Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 287 1977, 1:30 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 3731: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 3731 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3731: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (76-77-47, RM-1200)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3731 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NOS. 3732 THROUGH 3734: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance Nos.
3732 through 3734 for first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 3732: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-46(4), RS-HS-10,O00,
Tract No. 9466)
ORDINANCE NO. 3733: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-55(5), GL)
ORDINANCE NO. 3734: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-9(7), CL)
139: SUPPORT OF SB 428: Councilwoman Kaywood urged support of SB 428 which would
tighten the Child Pornography Law which, in her opinion, should be termed, Child
Abuse Law. By general Council consent, staff was directed to support SB 428 in
the most appropriate manner.
114: COMMENTS ON ADOPTION OF 1977-78 BUDGET: Councilman Seymour expressed his
dismay over adoption of the Budget as presented and reminded the Council at the
time they ran for office, they promised fiscal conservatism and expounded how
much they were going to save the taxpayer. When the time came to vote in taxes,
however, a $135 million Budget was adopted.
Councilman Kott responded that he promised fiscal conservatism but as he stated
at a prior meeting, he wanted to see where money could be saved and Councilman
Seymour showed where it could not be saved.
Councilman Seymour explained that the list he presented specifically outlined
where Budget cuts could be made to directly save taypayer dollars.
Councilman Kott emphasized that was not what people wanted. He considered his
vote to be a Conservative one and although he would prefer a zero tax base, such
was not possible,and the people realized they had to pay for government. In his
opinion, and as the record would show, around Orange County, the City was well run
and a good Budget was adopted that would prove itself through the year.
119: PUBLICITY ON VACANCIES ON BOARDS~ COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES OF THE CITY:
Councilman Roth thanked and commended both the Public Information Officer and
press for the publicity given vacancies on City boards, commissions and committees
77-763
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 28, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
and solicitation of applications to fill these vacancies from the community.
He was also pleased with the response received which indicated there were many
people in the community interested in working for the benefit of the community
at large. He especially reiterated his thanks to the press for their excellent
cooperation.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Seymour moved to adjourn to Wednesday, June 29, 1977,
at 2:00 P.M. Councilman Kott seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 6:01 P.M.
LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK