The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 2021/04/12.pdf04-12-2021 Page 1 of 4 City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, April 12, 2021 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairperson: Kimberly Keys • Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Natalie Meeks • Commissioners: Lucille Kring, Rosa Mulleady, LuisAndres Perez Dave Vadodaria, Steve White • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment SPECIAL NOTICE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID- 19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act-related provisions of Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. Pursuant to Executive Order N-29- 20, please be advised that Planning Commission members may participate in this meeting remotely. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 and given the current health concerns, members of the public can access the meeting live on-line, with audio and limited video, at www.anaheim.net/planning. Public participation may occur in three ways: (1) members of the public can submit comments electronically for Planning Commission consideration by sending them to planningcommission@anaheim.net or directly to the project planner as indicated on each item below. To ensure distribution to the Planning Commission prior to consideration of the agenda, please submit comments prior to 1:30 p.m. the day of the meeting. Public comments submitted after 1:30 p.m. will be posted to the Planning Commission website the day after the meeting. Email addresses and phone numbers will be redacted; (2) members of the public can provide in-person comments during the Planning Commission meeting in the City Council Chambers. Social distancing measures will be in place, masks are required, and once a participant has made a public comment, the participant will be asked to exit the building; and (3) members of the public can contact the Planning and Building Department at 714-765-5139, the project planner as indicated on each item below, or 04-12-2021 Page 2 of 4 planningcommission@anaheim.net with any questions. A copy of the staff report may be obtained on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, April 8, 2021, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection by contacting the Planning and Building Department at 714-765-5139 during regular business hours, or by contacting the project planner as indicated on each item below. ACCESSIBILITY: If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, in order to observe and/or offer public comment may request such reasonable modification, accommodation, aid, or service by contacting the Building and Planning Department at 714-765-5139 or planningcommission@anaheim.net, no later than 8:00 a.m. on the day of the scheduled meeting. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 04-12-2021 Page 3 of 4 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00155 (DEV2020-00299A) Location: 1150 North Harbor Boulevard, Suite 170 Request: The applicant requests approval of a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for off-premises sale of alcoholic beverages at an existing convenience store in conjunction with a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) ABC License. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Scott Koehm skoehm@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06035 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2020-00449 DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 (DEV2019-00042) Location: 2501-2525 East Ball Road Request: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to construct a new 24-hour convenience market with gas sales and an express carwash with ancillary vacuums, (ii) an associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit off-premises sales of alcoholic beverages, (iii) an administrative adjustment to exceed the maximum permitted wall height along the northerly (residential) property line; and (iv) a tentative parcel map to consolidate three parcels into two lots. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32 (Infill Development). Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Wayne Carvalho wcarvalho@anaheim.net 04-12-2021 Page 4 of 4 Adjourn to Monday, April 26, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 3:00 p.m. April 7, 2021 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 8:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 8:00 de la mañana un día hábil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 12, 2021 SUBJECT: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00155 LOCATION: 1150 North Harbor Boulevard, Suite 170 (Circle K) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Kashmir Singh, and the property owner is Cal-Branson Investment, Inc. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption in conjunction with an upgrade of an existing Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine license to a Type 21 Off-Sale General license at an existing convenience store. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Enviro nmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and approve the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00155. BACKGROUND: The 2,620 square foot Circle K convenience store is within a 13,450 square foot commercial shopping center located on a 1.14-acre property. The property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and the General Plan designates the property for Parks uses. The property is bordered by recreational uses to the east and south, and commercial uses to the north and west across Harbor Boulevard. On March 1, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06095 for this Circle K store to permit t he sale of alcoholic beverages for off- premises consumption. The convenience store has had a license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for the off-premises sale of alcoholic beverages since 1988, but no zoning entitlements were associated with this ABC license. Approval of this conditional use permit brought the use into conformity with the Zoning Code. Subsequent to this approval, ABC notified the applicant that a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity is also required because this property is located within a reporting district with a crime rate above the City average. PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption in conjunction with an upgrade of an existing Type 20 Off-Sale Beer and Wine DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00155 April 12, 2021 Page 2 of 3 license to a Type 21 Off-Sale General license at an existing convenience store. No modifications to the building’s exterior or interior space are proposed. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN): State law limits the issuance of new alcohol sales licenses when a license is requested in a police reporting district with a crime rate above the City average or when there is an overconcentration in the number of ABC licenses within a census tract. A determination of Public Convenience or Necessity is required for this application because this property is located within a reporting district with a crime rate above the City average. State law also states that such restrictions can be waived if the local jurisdiction makes a determination that the proposed business would serve "public convenience or necessity." The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control bases the number of permitted alcohol licenses on the population in the census tract. The subject property is in Census Tract Number 865.01, which has a population of 4,848. This population allows for two off-sale licenses, and there are presently four off-sale licenses in the tract (one of which belongs to the applicant at this Circle K). This census tract is generally bounded by State Route 91 to the north, Harbor Boulevard to the west, Patt Street and Olive Street to the East, and Sycamore Street to the south. This location is within Police Reporting District 1424, which has a crime rate that is 58% above the city average. There have been four calls for service to this location in the last year consisting of one assault, one robbery, one petty theft, and one vandalism. Police Department staff do not consider t he number of calls to this business in the last year exce ssive for a business at this location. The Police Department also analyzes public convenience or necessity requests based on crime statistics within a ¼-mile radius of the subject site. This appro ach provides a complete assessment of crime in the surrounding area and gives an accurate depiction of crime and its relation, if any, to the subject site. This measurement also results in a uniform standard for evaluation of PCN applications, regardless of a project site’s location or the size of a reporting district. The quarter mile radius surrounding this location is 107% above the city average in crime. The attached statement of justification by the applicant indicates that the store will continue to sell prepackaged food beverages. In addition, the applicant agrees to continue to comply with ABC laws and regulations. Staff believes that with the employee training in responsible beverage service, and the recommended conditions of approval relating to restrictions on alcoholic beverage packaging, displays, signage, property maintenance, and on-site consumption, the use would be compatible with the surrounding commercial land uses. Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06095, approved on March 1, 2021, includes conditions of approval such as prohibiting any exterior advertising of alcoholic beverages, prohibiting the sales of alcoholic beverages in 50 milliliter “airplane service” sized bottles, and requir ing ABC LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Dr ugs) training for employees. The same conditions of approval included in this conditional use permit have been included in the draft resolution for this request. DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00155 April 12, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Based on staff’s review and the conditions included in the previously approved conditional use permit and proposed for this permit, staff supports the request for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). The Class 1 exemption consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of the use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and would not cause a significant effect on the environment. The Applicant is requesting a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption. The request pertains to an existing convenience store and does not include any interior or exterior improvements; and, therefore, the proposed project meets the criteria for a Class 1 Exemption. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project would be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: The proposed sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption is a compatible use with the surrounding area. The recommended conditions of approval would ensure that the sale of alcoholic beverages would not have an adverse impact on the surrounding land uses. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Scott Koehm Niki Wetzel, AICP Principal Planner Deputy Director of Planning and Building Attachments: 1. Draft Public Convenience or Necessity Resolution 2. Letter of Request 3. Justification Letter 4. Floor Plan 5. Police Department Memo 6. Photographs PR LA PALMA PARK & STADIUM C-G CARL'S JR. C-G BUSINESS SCHOOL C-G BUSINESS SCHOOL I INDUSTRIAL C-G VACANT C-G VACANTC-G Starbucks RM-4 PARKING LOT PR VACANTC-G PALM MOTOR L ODGE C-G MEDICAL OFFICE C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL C-G VACANT RM-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4 CORAL TREE APTS 17 DU C-G SERVICE STATION C-G AUTO DEALERSHIP C-G PRESCHOOL C-G DEV20 20-0 0299 RETAIL RM-4 (MHP) MOBILEHOME PARK 50 RESIDENTS RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RM-4 OFFICES RM-4 OFFICES PR OFFICES C-G CHURCH C-G CROWN MOTEL PR VACANT RM-4 CHURCH C-G TRAILER PARK 7 RESIDENTS P R S P O R T S F I E L D PR OFFICES N H A R B O R B L V D N S W A N S T N LA PALMA PARK WAY N R A L E I G H S T W VICTOR AVE N H O M E R S T W CA RL KARCHER WAY N R A V E N N A S T W RO MNEYA DR N . E U C L I D S T W. LA PALMA AVE N . E A S T S T E. LA PALMA AVE N . A N A H E I M B L V D N . H A R B O R B L V D 1 1 5 0 North Harb or Boulevard, Suite 170 D E V N o. 202 0-00299A Subject Property APN: 267-131-06 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph ot o: Ma y 2 02 0 N H A R B O R B L V D N S W A N S T N LA PALMA PARK WAY N R A L E I G H S T W VICTOR AVE N H O M E R S T W CA RL KARCHER WAY N R A V E N N A S T W JULIA NN A ST W RO MNEYA DR N . E U C L I D S T W. LA PALMA AVE N . E A S T S T E. LA PALMA AVE N . A N A H E I M B L V D N . H A R B O R B L V D 1 1 5 0 North Harb or Boulevard, Suite 170 D E V N o. 202 0-00299A Subject Property APN: 267-131-06 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph ot o: Ma y 2 02 0 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2021-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2021-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00155 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2020-00299A) (1150 NORTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 170) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00155 to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (“Proposed Project”) at that certain real property located at 1150 North Harbor Boulevard, Suite 170 in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property, approximately 1.14-acres in size, is developed with a 13,450 square foot commercial center, including the 2,620 square foot convenience store. The Property is located within the “Parks” land use designation of the Anaheim General Plan. The Property is also located in the "C-G" General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code ("Code"); and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act -related provisions of Executive Order N- 25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeing to observe and to address the local legislative body; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 the Planning Commission did hold a joint teleconferencing and in-person public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on March 1, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and - 2 - PC2021-*** WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the t ime of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a Determination of Public Convenience o r Necessity No. 2020-00155, does find and determine the following facts: 1. On July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134 establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC"). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an "undue concentration" of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance of a license. For purposes of Section 23958.4, "undue concentration" means the case in which the Property is located in an area where any of the following conditions exist: (a) The Property is located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number of “reported crimes” (as defined in Section 23958.4), as determined from all crime reporting districts within the City of Anaheim. (b) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located. (c) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county. 3. Notwithstanding the existence of the above-referenced conditions, ABC may issue a license if the Planning Commission determines that the "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance. 4. Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to "public convenience or necessity" determinations; and, when the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption is permitted by the Code, said - 3 - PC2021-*** recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. 5. The Property is located within Census Tract No. 865.01 with a population of 4,848 that allows for two off-sale ABC licenses. There are presently four off-sale ABC license s in the tract , including the current license issued for the Property. The Property is located in Police Reporting District No. 1424, which has a crime rate that is 58 percent above the citywide average. The Police Department evaluates these requests based on the crime rate within a one-quarter mile radius of the Property for the subject site. The crime rate within ¼ mile of this Property is 107 percent above the citywide average based upon calls for service. Since the crime rate is above the citywide average, a determination of "public convenience or necessity" is required. 6. The request to permit alcoholic beverage sales for off-premises consumption in conjunction with a convenience store would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the Property is currently developed with a convenience store with a license to permit beer and wine sales for off- premises consumption and the proposed license is compatible with the existing uses in the surrounding area, and; 7. The determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" can be made based on the finding that the license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission guidelines for such determinations and further that the granting of the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolut ion. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00155 and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00155 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. - 4 - PC2021-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 12, 2021. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2021-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 12, 2021, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of April, 2021. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2021-*** - 7 - PC2021-*** EXHIBIT “B” PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00155 (DEV2020-00299A) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total display area in a building. All distilled spirit products shall be placed on shelves behind the cash register or in a locked cabinet. Police Department 2 The business operator shall be responsible to maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted. Police Department 3 The display and sale of airplane service sized bottles of alcohol (approximately 50 milliliters in size) shall be prohibited. Police Department 4 No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department 5 The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these premises. Police Department 6 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours. Police Department 7 The business operator shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the premises. Police Department 8 There shall be no pay to play amusement machines or video game devices maintained upon the premises at any time. Police Department 9 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign on any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. Police Department 10 Managers/Owners shall contact the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program), RBS, or similar certificate training for themselves and register employees. The contact number for ABC is 657-205-3533. Police Department 11 The Petitioner(s) shall post and maintain a professional quality sign facing the premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows: Police Department - 8 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING, NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST The sign shall be at least two feet square with two inch block lettering. The sign shall be in English and Spanish. 12 The convenience market shall be operated in accordance with the Statement of Operations submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation as described in that document shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Request and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 13 The applicant shall encourage the property owner to continuously maintain onsite landscaping to ensure that landscaping is replaced with drought tolerant plants in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. In addition, the applicant shall coordinate with the Anaheim Police Department to address loitering on the property. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division GENERAL CONDITIONS 14 Window signs shall comply with the maximum area allowed by the Zoning Code. At no time shall window signs exceed 20% of the window area. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 15 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 16 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 9 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT litigation, including without limitatio n attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. 17 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 4887 E. La Palma Ave. Ste. 707 Anaheim, CA 92807 T : [714] 695-9300 F : [714] 693-1002 KARAKI WESTERN STATES Engineering, Inc. December 7, 2020 Project Name: Circle K Convenience Store Project Address: 1150 N. Harbor Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801 APN: 267-131-06 LETTER OF REQUEST Kashmir Singh on behalf of Cal-Branson Investment, Inc. is requesting the City of Anaheim to allow Condition Use Permit ABC Type-21 (Off-Sale General) License (previously Type-20 Off-Sale Beer & Wine) License for the existing Circle K Convenience Store at the North East corner of Harbor Blvd. and W.Carl Karcher Way. The improvements proposed to the site remains the same. According to the City of Anaheim Zoning Map the property is located in the General Commercial (C-G). The existing convenience store will have no change to the design of the surrounding areas. It will still provide sale of prepackage food and beverages that will include the off sale of Beer, Wine & Spirits (License Type-21). The C-store will operate 24/7 with approximately 4 employees. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.KARAKIWS.COM February 23, 2021 Mr. Peter Lange Planning Division Manager City of Anaheim Office: 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim CA 92805 T: 714-765-5139 SUBJECT: RE: JUSTIFICATION LETTER FOR FOR TYPE 21 ALCOHOL LICENSE 1150 N. HARBOR AVENUE, STE. 170 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 To whom it may concern: This Justification Letter is for Type -21 Alcohol License application for the project located at 1150 N Harbor Blvd. #170 in the City of Anaheim. The location address is a currently a Circle-K convenience store, and has an existing Type-20 Alcohol license. The existing convenience store will have no change to the design of the surrounding areas. It will still provide sale of prepackage food and beverages that will include the off sale of Beer, Wine & Spirits (License Type-21) Information: # of employees / residents: There will be total 4 for the Convenience Store. Hours of operation: Convenience Store open 24 hours 7days. The convenience store will be required to obtain and comply with the requirements of a license from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (“ABC”). Compliance with the ABC requirements and other measures ensure that the sale of beer, wine, & spirits for offsite consumption at the Property will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. If you have any concerns or questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 714-695-9300 We appreciate the Planning Division’s support of our proposed project and look forward to addressing any questions or concerns the City might have with regard to our project. Sincerely Joseph Karaki Applicant ATTACHMENT NO. 3 WALL LEGEND NOTES AT M PROJECT DATA ZONING CG LAND USE GENERAL COMMERCIAL BLDG SETBACKS EAST (REAR) NORTH (SIDE) SOUTH (SIDE) WEST (FRONT) REQUIRED PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA LOT COVERAGE FLOOR AREA RATIO MAXIMUM HEIGHT PARKING PARKING COMPUTATION PARKING STANDARDS SIZE PROVIDED REGULAR COMPACT HANDICAP LOADING TYPE BIKE/MOTORCYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS USE FORMULA REQUIRED PROVIDED BUILDING DATA BUILDING C-STORE OCCUPANCY TYPE OF CONST NUMBER OF STORY AREA BLDG HEIGHT HANDICAP PARKING REQUIREMENTS FORMULA REQUIRED PROVIDED AREA OF SITE CIRCLE K CONVENIENCE STORE 1150 N. HARBOR BLVD. SUITE #170 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 ABC - TYPE 21 (OFF-SALE GENERAL LICENSE) VICINITY / SITE MAP J I H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 3 4 2 1 DESCRIPTIONNO.BY DATE REVISIONS SUBMITTAL OWNER NAME & ADDRESS PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 1 A B C D E F G H 2 3 4 5 6 J 7 8 109 11 12 13 14 DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: DATEBYNO. DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: SCALE: I JOB No CUP No \ \ D C - 1 \ E n g i n e e r i n g \ _ C u r r e n t P r o j e c t s \ E 8 6 1 1 0 _ C i r c l e K _ A n a h e i m - 1 1 5 0 N H A R B O R B L V D \ C A D \ A - 1 . 0 F L O O R P L A N . d w g CONSULTANT/ SEALS E86110 CAL-BRANSON INVESTMENT CIRCLE K KARAKI CONVENIENCE STORE 1150 N. HARBOR BLVD. SUITE #170 ANAHEIM, CA, CA 92801 Plotted: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 2:03 PM ChristopherTamase 12.07.20 115O N. HARBOR BLVD. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 8+%+0+6;/#2 '(.1142.#0 241,'%6&#6# #ÄSCALE:1 (E) FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" PROJECT SITE ATTACHMENT NO. 4 City of Anaheim INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE To: Peter Lange/Planning Department Case No.: DEV 2020-00299 Circle K 1150 N. Harbor Blvd. #170 Date: January 11, 2021 From: Lieutenant Curtis Faulkner Anaheim Police Department Special Operations Commander Contact: Name: Civilian Investigator Michele Murray Phone: 714-765-1461 Email: mmurray@anaheim.net The Police Department has reviewed the above case. Please see the following comments and conditions for more information: COMMENTS: Public Convenience and Necessity Information: The Police Department has received an I.D.C. Route Sheet for DEV 2020-00299. The request is to upgrade their ABC license from off-sale beer and wine to full alcohol. The location is in Census Tract Number 865.01 which has a population of 4,848. This population allows for 5 on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there are presently 4 licenses in the tract. It also allows for 2 off-sale licenses and there are presently 4 licenses in the tract. This location is within Reporting District 1424 which is 58% above the city average in crime. There have been 4 calls for service to this location in the last year and they consisted of: 1 assault, 1 robbery, 1 petty theft, and 1 vandalism. The ¼ mile radius surrounding this location is 107% above the city average in crime. The calls for service primarily consisted of: 33 drug violations, 41 petty thefts, and 23 simple assaults. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: There is a high transient population that exists in and around this strip center. We recommend the alcohol be located on shelves behind the register or in locked cabinets. The Police Department requests the following conditions be placed on the Conditional Use Permit: 1. The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted. Police Department 2. The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total display area in a building. Police Department ATTACHMENT NO. 5 3. No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department 4. The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these premises. Police Department 5. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours. Police Department 6. Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the premises. Police Department 7. There shall be no pay to play amusement machines or video game devices maintained upon the premises at any time. Police Department 8. There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. Police Department 9. Managers/Owners shall contact the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program), RBS, or similar certificate training for themselves and register employees. The contact number for ABC is 657-205-3533. Police Department 10. The Petitioner(s) shall post and maintain a professional quality sign facing the premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows: NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST The sign shall be at least two feet square with two inch block lettering. The sign shall be in English and Spanish. Police Department Concur: Office of Chief of Police f:\home\mmurray\DEV2020-00299 1150 N Harbor Circle K.doc K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.WESTERNSEC.COM PROJECT: CIRCLE K CONVENIENCE STATION (ABC TYPE-21 OFF-SALE GENERAL LICENSE) PROJECT ADDRESS: 1150 N. HARBOR BLVD., STE.#170, ANAHEIM, CA 90805 PROJECT SITE AERIAL PHOTO (GOOGLE) 5 PROJECT SITE 1 6 4 2 3 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.WESTERNSEC.COM PROJECT SITE PHOTOS 1. PROJECT SITE – NORTHWEST (ALONG W. CARL KARCHER WAY) 2. PROJECT SITE – NORTH (ALONG W. CARL KARCHER WAY) K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.WESTERNSEC.COM 3. PROJECT SITE – WEST (ALONG N. HARBOR BLVD) 4. ADJACENT PROPERTIES - NORTH (COMMERCIAL) K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.WESTERNSEC.COM 5. ADJACENT PROPERTIES - NORTHWEST (COMMERCIAL) 6. ADJACENT PROPERTIES - WEST (COMMERCIAL) K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.WESTERNSEC.COM INTERIOR PHOTOS K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.WESTERNSEC.COM 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 12, 2021 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06035 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2020-00449 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 LOCATION: 2501-2525 East Ball Road APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Anaheim Care LLC represented by Shira Zaghi. The property owner is 5G LLC represented by Morrie Golcheh. This application was originally submitted in September of 2019 with authorization from the previous property owner. The current owner acquired title of the property in April of 2020. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to construct a new 24-hour convenience market with gas sales and an express carwash with ancillary vacuums, (ii) an associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit off-premises sales of alcoholic beverages, and (iii) an administrative adjustment to exceed the maximum wall height along residential properties, and (iv) a tentative parcel map to consolidate three parcels into two lots. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 32, Infill Development ) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06035, Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00148, Administrative Adjustment No. 2020- 00449, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-100. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2020-00449 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 April 12, 2021 Page 2 of 5 BACKGROUND: This item was presented to the Planning Commission for consideration at their January 20, 2021 meeting. At that meeting, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing, took public testimony, closed the public hearing, and voted 6-1 (White – No) to continue the item to a date uncertain. The Planning Commission continued the item to allow the applicant the opportunity to consider an increased wall height along residential properties to the rear (northerly) of the project site, to hold another community meeting, and to submit additional information pertaining to security surveillance, lighting, and fuel deliveries. The Planning Commission also requested to receive information from the City’s Economic Development Department on assistance efforts to relocate existing tenants. The applicant has completed these items and is requesting further Planning Commission consideration on the project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct a new 2,950 sq. ft. convenience store with gas sales, the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption, and an associated 3,100 sq. ft . gas canopy structure with six fuel dispenser islands. A separate 4,381 sq. ft., automated carwash facility with vacuum stalls is proposed to be constructed on the east side of the site. Both the convenience store and carwash buildings would be 20-feet in height. The project also involves the consolidation of three parcels into two for the purpose of constructing the two uses on separate lots, and a 12-foot high wall along the northerly property line separating the commercial property from single-family residential uses. A copy of the January 20, 2021 Planning Commission staff report is provided in Attachment No. 3 which includes a detailed description and land use analysis of the project. The following identifies issues raised by the Planning Commission during their motion to continue and a summary of how each issue was addressed. 1. The developer should host another community meeting to address concerns raised from neighbors and commercial tenants. A community meeting was hosted by the applicant on February 17, 2021 via a Zoom webinar. The applicant provided a list of attendees who had RSVP’d (48) and attended (30) the virtual meeting. A separate list of questions that were raised at the meeting was also submitted (Attachment No. 4) noting that responses to questions were given verbally. 2. The developer should consider a higher wall along the residential properties. An application for a variance was received on January 25, 2021 requesting to permit an increased wall height along the northerly residential property line. Based on further review, it was determined that the request could be processed as an administrative adjustment pursuant to the City’s zoning code as referenced in this report. The proposed 12-foo t high wall would co nsist of a 10 -foot high split -face block wall with two feet of Plexiglas on top as depicted in the wall detail below. The applicant indicates that the residential property owners support the increased height and design of the wall. With this modification, an assessment from Veneklasen Associates (Attachment No. 5), who prepared the acoustical study, concluded that the increased wall height would further reduce sound levels by 0 -3 decibels. The difference in these levels are due to the 9-foot high barrier designed at the exit tunnel on the east side of the building which will already provide reduced noise levels from the carwash blowers . Alt hough the study had concluded that the originall y proposed 8-foot high wall would adequately mitigate noise impacts to the residences, staff supports the administrative adjustment for the increased height. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2020-00449 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 April 12, 2021 Page 3 of 5 The applicant also provided a conceptual landscape plan that proposes intensified landscaping along the proposed 12-foot high wall and residential property line (Attachment No. 6). The plan depicts Podocarpus (Plum Pine) trees which would span the entire length of the northern property line providing a visually screen hedge between the commercial and residential properties. 3. Provide an update as to the assistance from the City’s Community and Economic Development Department. Since the last Planning Commission meeting, the City’s Community and Economic Development Department conducted additional outreach to the commercial tenants with the intention of assist ing them in their relocation efforts. Staff indicates that all of the tenants have been contacted and offered relocation assistance. The tenants have been provided with information on available commercial space in Anaheim. As referenced in Attachment No. 7, two tenants have received grants from the Anaheim Small-Business Grant Program, one tenant has closed their business, and two have signed or are in the process of signing new leases at new Anaheim locations. According to the Economic Development Department, the business owner of the Jagerhaus German Restaurant has entered into a 10-year lease to relocate to 30 S. Anaheim Boulevard in downtown Anaheim. 4. Staff should consider additional conditions to address impacts from new light sources and fuel deliveries. Photometric Studies and Lighting Specifications were submitted to address the potential light and glare impacts to the residents. The studies (Attachment No. 8), demonstrate that the proposed light sources will not have a negative impact on neighboring residents. According to 7-Eleven, the fuel would be delivered every 2-4 days during the busiest times and 5-7 days during average use. There is no set schedule for fuel deliveries as they are automatically scheduled when sensors in the fuel tanks get to certain levels. Refueling usually takes between 25-45 minutes. 5. The developer should provide a security surveillance plan to demonstrate the entire project site will be under surveillance. A security plan with camera surveillance was submitted depicting the proposed location and types of surveillance cameras at both the convenience store/gas station and the express carwash (Attachment No. 9). The security plan for the convenience store depicts exterior cameras surveilling the west and south sides of the store. Staff recommends additional cameras be installed to monitor the driveway area directly behind the convenience store and has included a related condition of approval in the draft resolution. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2020-00449 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 April 12, 2021 Page 4 of 5 Administrative Adjustment: The Planning Director has review authority over Administrative Adjustments, but may refer any application to the Planning Commission for review. Since the conditional use permit must be approved by the Planning Commission, the Planning Director has referred the Administrative Adjustment to the Commission to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the project and to make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The adjustment is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code; 2) The same or similar result cannot be achieved by using provisions in the Zoning Code that do not require the adjustment; and 3) The adjustment will not produce a result that is out of character or detrimental to the neighborhood. In this case, the maximum height requirements for fences and walls may be approved subject to approval of an administrative adjustment. The Anaheim Zoning Code specifies the following: Maximum height requirements for fences, walls, hedges and berms in any required structural setback or yard in any non-residential zone separating any non- residential from an adjacent residential zone where the additional height is required to minimize negative impacts to the residential use. The applicant is request ing an administrative adjustment for the 12 -foot high wall to separate the commercial property from the residences where an eight -foot high had previously been proposed. The applicant has submitted this application and design of the wall at the request of the residential property owners. Staff supports this request as the additional four feet would provide a higher barrier for screening, privacy, and sound attenuation. Further, walls that exceed the maximum Code permitted height have also been granted at other carwash locations in the City that abut residential property. The applicant has submitt ed a petition with signatures in support of the project (Attachment No. 11) as well as a record of outreach and responses from the residential property owners on Hilda Street that abut the project site (Attachment. No. 12). Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32 (In-fill Development). Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in- fill development meeting the conditions described in Section 15332. These conditions include that the proposed project is (a) consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; (b) occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; (d) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and, (e) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The CEQA checklist, attached to this staff report as Attachment 6, provides CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2020-00449 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 April 12, 2021 Page 5 of 5 evidence that the proposed project meets these conditions. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that, as designed and with the proposed conditions imposed, the convenience market and carwash uses would be compatible with the surrounding commercial and residential land uses. The new request to increase the height of the wall between the commercial and residential uses will further minimize potential impacts to the residential property owners. The proposed project is consistent with the General Commercial zoning for the property and will be designed to ensure that vehicular queuing and circulation, parking, and noise generated by the uses do not impact surrounding properties. The market and carwash will provide a convenience to customers to get their vehicle fueled, washed, and to purchase everyday necessities. The conditions of approval relating to the sale of beer and wine and security surveillance will ensure that the uses would not be detrimental to the area. The proposed number of parking spaces would be adequate to serve the proposed uses. Based upon these reasons, staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Wayne Carvalho Niki Wetzel, AICP Contract Planner Deputy Planning and Building Director Attachments: 1. Draft CUP, ADJ, and PCN Resolution 2. Draft SUBPM Resolution 3. January 21, 2021 Planning Commission staff report (with attachments) 4. Community Meeting Feb. 17, 2021 – Q&A Report 5. Barrier Modification Acoustical Assessment 6. Conceptual Landscape Plan 7. Sunkist Plaza Business List – Status Updates 8. Photometric Studies and Lighting Specifications 9. Security Surveillance Plan 10. Wall Exhibit – Cross-section 11. Signatures of Support 12. Hilda Street Neighbor Responses C-G DEV 2019 -0004 2 RETAIL C-G RETAIL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R M -4 F O U R P L E X C-G SERVICE STATION RM-4 THE VIL LAGER APARTMENTS 190 DU RM-4 TRIPLEX RM-4 TRIPLEX O-L MEDICAL OFFICE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S -3 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R M -4 F O U R P L E X RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R M -4 F O U R P L E X RS-3 SIN GLE FA MILY RESIDENCE R M -4 F O U R P L E X RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE E BALL RD S S U N K I S T S T S HILDA ST E RILES CIR E ALKI P L S C A R L S T E WHIDBY LN E OMEGA AVE S S U N B U R S T W A Y S L A R A M I E S T E HILDA PL E CLIFPARK WAY E ALKI PL E. BALL RD S . S U N K I S T S T S . E A S T S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. HOWELL AVE 2 5 0 1 -25 25 East Ball Ro ad D E V N o. 201 9-00042 Subject Property APN: 253-072-18 253-072-19 253-072-14 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph ot o: Ma y 2 01 9 E BALL RD S S U N K I S T S T S HILDA ST E RILES CIR E ALKI P L S C A R L S T E WHIDBY LN E OMEGA AVE S S U N B U R S T W A Y S L A R A M I E S T E HILDA PL E CLIFPARK WAY E ALKI PL E. BALL RD S . S U N K I S T S T S . E A S T S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. HOWELL AVE 2 5 0 1 E a s t B a l l R o a d D E V N o . 2 0 1 9 -0 0 0 4 2 Subject Property APN: 253-072-18 253-072-19 253-072-14 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph ot o: Ma y 2 01 9 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 -1- PC2021-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2021-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06035, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2020-00449 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2019-00042) (2501-2525 EAST BALL ROAD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06035, Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00148, and Administrative Adjustment No. 2020-00449 to construct a new 24-hour convenience market with gas sales and an express carwash wit h ancillary vacuum and a wall that exceeds the maximum height along the northerly residential property line, and an associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit off-premises sales of alcoholic beverages (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project ") on that certain real property located at 2501-2525 West Ball Road in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), pursuant to Section 18.60.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (“Code”); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.86- acres in size and is developed with an approximate 17,000 square foot, 1-story commercial building. The Property is located in the C-G (General Commercial) zone and is, therefore, subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial zones) of the Code. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General Commercial land uses; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newson issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act -related provisions of Executive Order N- 25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeing to observe and to address the local legislative body; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 the Planning Commission did hold a teleconferencing public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 12, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06035, Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00148, and Administrative Adjustment No. 2020-00449 and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code - 2 - PC2021-*** of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 32 – In-fill Development projects) which consists of in-fill development meeting the conditions described in Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines; that is, (a) the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations, (the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (c) the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (d) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (e) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Property is located within an "urbanized area", as that term is defined in Section 15387 of the CEQA Guidelines, and meets the aforementioned conditions and will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06035, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The Proposed Project is an allowable use within the "C-G" Commercial Zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030.010 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" Commercial Zone; and 2. The request to permit the Proposed Project would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area because the conditions of approval contained herein will mitigate any potential impacts to surrounding residential properties. Furthermore, the Proposed Project will improve the aesthetics on the Property and the overall appearance of the project site, and would not have an adverse effect on adjacent residential and commercial uses; and 3. The size and shape of t he site is adequate to allow the full development of the Proposed Project in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area nor to the health and safety of the public because the site can accommodate the parking, traffic flows, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties; and 4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets and adequate parking will be provided to accommodate the future uses; and 5. The granting of the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the Proposed Project would significantly improve the overall appearance of the project site, and is compatible with the surrounding area, subject to compliance with the conditions contained herein; and - 3 - PC2021-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00148, does find and determine the following facts: 1. On July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134 establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC"). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an "undue concentration" of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance of a license. For purposes of Sectio n 23958.4, "undue concentration" means the case in which the Property is located in an area where any of the following conditions exist: (a) The Property is located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number of “reported crimes” (as defined in Section 23958.4), as determined from all crime reporting districts within the City of Anaheim. (b) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located. (c) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale r etail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county. 3. Notwithstanding the existence of the above-referenced conditions, ABC may issue a license if the Planning Commission determines that the "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance. 4. Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to "public convenience or necessity" determinations; and, when the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption is permitted by the Code, said recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alco holic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. 5. The Property is located Census Tract Number 863.06 which has a population of 3,658 people. This population allows for four (4) on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there is presently two (2) licenses in the tract. It also allows for two (2) off-sale licenses and there are presently three (3) licenses in the tract. This location is within Reporting District 1829 which - 4 - PC2021-*** is below the city average in crime. The ¼-mile radius surrounding this location is 30% above the city average in crime. Since the crime rate is above the citywide average, a determination of "public convenience or necessity" is required. 6. The request to permit alcoholic beverage sales for off-premises consumption would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the proposed development of the premises is compatible with the existing uses in the surrounding area. 7. The determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" can be made based on the finding that the license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission guidelines for such determinations and further that the granting of the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for Administrative Adjustment No. 2020-00449 for a 12-foot high combination masonry block/Plexiglas wall along the residential property line may be approved for the following reasons: 1. The adjustment for increased wall height is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code because the wall will provide additional separation and will serve as a barrier between the commercial uses and residential uses. The additional height of the combination wall will help minimize negative impacts to the residential use. 2. The same or similar result cannot be achieved by using provisions in the Zoning Code that do not require the adjustment. The Zoning Code limits walls separating commercially- zoned property from residentially-zoned property to eight feet in height. The application of the adjustment to allow for a 12-foot wall height is permitted through the approval of an administrative adjustment to minimize negative impacts to reside ntial uses . 3. The adjustment will allow for the combination wall comprised of masonry block and a Plexiglas top to adequately screen and minimize impacts between the non-residential and residential uses, and will not produce a result that is out of character or detrimental to the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06035, Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019- 00148, and Administrative Adjustment No. 2020-00449 at the Property, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City - 5 - PC2021-*** of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demo nstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 12, 2021. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2021-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 12, 2021, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of April, 2021. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 7 - PC2021-*** - 8 - PC2021-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06035 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2020-00449 (DEV2019-00042) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS 1 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works, Development Services 2 Prepare and submit a final drainage study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological calculations to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopt ed Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build- out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. The final drainage study shall include calculations for 10, 25 and 100-yr flows for both existing and proposed condition and show that proposed condition flows do not exceed the existing condition flows. Public Works, Development Services 3 Execute a Save Harmless Agreement with the City of Anaheim for any storm drain connections to the City’s storm drain system. The agreement shall be recorded by the applicant on the property prior to the issuance of any permits. Public Works, Development Services 4 Obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works, Development Services 5 Prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for Public Works Development Services Division review upon request. Public Works, Development Services - 9 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 6 Submit a Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/Significant Redevelopment projects. The WQMP shall identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. The Final WQMP shall be subject to the following additional conditions, which have resulted from the review of the Preliminary WQMP for this project: • All DMAs must be clarified in the WQMP narrative and on the WQMP exhibit. For example, the ridgeline labels on south side of the property currently do not follow the DMA boundary. The flow direction of these areas will need to be confirmed in the Final WQMP to ensure all areas of the project are treated by BMP. • Cross section details must match BMP design specifications in the WQMP calculations (e.g., media depth). • Final structural BMPs must be included in Section V and in the O&M Attachment along with identified responsible party for long term operation and maintenance of BMPs. N14/S1 are applicable since drain inlets are proposed onsite. • All structural and non-structural BMPs must be described in the Final WQMP narrative as well as on the WQMP exhibit. This includes, for example, S3 for proper design of the two onsite trash enclosures. • Notice of Transfer of Responsibility shall be provided in the Final WQMP. Public Works, Development Services 7 Submit a Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall address grading and any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works, Development Services 8 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 10 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 9 Record Parcel Map No. 2020-100 pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and in accordance with City Municipal Code. Provide a duplicate photo Mylar of the recorded map to the City Engineer's office. Public Works, Development Services 10 Any/all existing easements in conflict with the proposed buildings shall be abandoned and the abandonment document recorded. Public Works, Development Services 11 Obtain a Right -of-Way Construction Permit (RCP) from the Development Services Division and post a security for construction of all required public improvements within street right-of-way. Public Works, Development Services 12 Provide a certificate from a Registered Civil Engineer certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works, Development Services 13 All site landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AV 1881). Public Works, Development Services 14 That curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red to prohibit parallel parking in the drive aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled on building plans. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 15 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 16 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 17 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 11 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. 18 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 19 The Car Wash shall comply with all state laws and local ordinances for Water Conservation Measures, including Chapter 10.18 of Anaheim Municipal Code and Ordinance relating to Water Reduction provisions. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 20 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 21 Individual water service and/or fire line connections will be required for each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit per Rule 18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules and Regulations. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 22 Applicant shall contact Water Engineering for recycled water system requirements and specific water conservation measures to be incorporated into the building and landscape construction plans. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 23 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 24 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 25 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering - 12 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 26 A Shared Parking Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building. The agreement shall specify the number and location of customer and employee parking available for all uses. Planning and Building Planning Services 27 The managers and/or owners shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning and Building Code Enforcement Division 28 Building shall be equipped with a comprehensive security alarm system (silent or audible) for the following coverage areas: • Perimeter of building and access route protection. • High valued storage areas. • Robbery Panic Alarm at Cashier register(s) Police Department 29 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. Police Department 30 Rooftop address numbers for the police helicopter. Minimum size 4’ in height and 2’ in width. The lines of the numbers are to be a minimum of 6” thick. Numbers should be spaced 12” to 18” apart. Numbers should be painted or constructed in a contrasting color to the roofing material. Numbers should face the street to which the structure is addressed. Numbers are not to be visible from ground level. Police Department 31 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the entrances of parking lots/structures and located in other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’ x 1’ in overall size, with white background and black 2” lettering. Police Department 32 All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C., to assist in removal of vehicles at the property owners/managers request Police Department 33 Closed circuit television (CCTV) security camera system, with the following coverage areas: • Interior entrance to store • Exterior entrance to store • Parking areas Police Department Planning and Building, Planning Services - 13 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT • Fuel pumps • Cashier’s area • Rear of the store and carwash along the residential properties 34 If security cameras are not monitored, signs indicating so should be placed at each camera. Police Department 35 CCTV monitors and recorders should be secured in a separate locked compartment to prevent theft of, or tampering with, the recording. Police Department 36 With advances in technology, digital and wireless CCTV security systems are readily available and highly recommended over older VHS or “Tape” recording systems. Police Department 37 CCTV recordings should be kept for a minimum of 30 days before being deleted or recorded over. Police Department 38 If used, CCTV videotapes should not be recorded over more than 10 items per tape. Police Department 39 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Number should be illuminated during hours of darkness. Police Department 40 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. Police Department 41 Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing device should be installed in solid doors where natural surveillance is compromised. Police Department 42 The locks shall be so constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside doorknob/lever/turn piece. Police Department 43 Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during hours of darkness. Police Department 44 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-site. Police Department - 14 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 45 All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. Police Department 46 Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. Police Department 47 Trees should not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult. Police Department 48 Trash enclosures should not block visibility of doors or windows or be located close enough to the structure to provide access to the roof. Police Department 49 Minimum recommended lighting level in all parking lots is .5 foot- candle maintained, measured at the parking surface, with a maximum to minimum ratio no greater than 15:1. Police Department 50 Whenever possible, open fencing design, such as wrought iron or tubular steel, should be utilized to maximize natural surveillance while enhancing territorial reinforcement. Police Department 51 The following installations should be considered: • Traffic bollards capable of stopping a moving vehicle shall be evenly spaced the front of the convenience store between the structure and parking area. • Locked cages, rooms, or safes (if any). Police Department PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 52 All public improvements shall be constructed by the developer, inspected and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Development Services 53 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works, Development Services 54 Set all Monuments in accordance with the parcel map and submit all centerline ties to Public Works Department. Any monuments Public Works, Development Services - 15 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT damaged as a result of construction shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 55 Fire lanes shall be posted with “No Parking Any Time.” Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 56 Left turns into and out of the site on Ball Road shall be prohibited. Signs marking “No Left Turn”, consistent with the current version of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices shall be installed to regulate this restriction until such time a raised median is installed on Ball Road. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 57 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities, Water Engineering OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 58 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. Police Department 59 The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total display area in a building. Police Department 60 No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department 61 The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these premises. Police Department 62 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours. Police Department 63 Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the premises. Police Department - 16 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 64 There shall be no pay to play amusement machines or video game devices maintained upon the premises at any time. Police Department 65 The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted. Police Department 66 Managers / Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program), RBS, or similar certificate training for themselves and register employees. The contact number for ABC is 657-205-3533. Police Department 67 The Petitioner(s) shall post and maintain a professional quality sign facing the premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows: NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST The sign shall be at least two feet square with two inch block lettering. The sign shall be in English and Spanish. Police Department 68 The car wash shall employ someone to monitor the vacuum area. They shall facilitate and encourage patrons to turn car radios off while vacuuming. This will help alleviate additional noise to the residential area. Police Department 69 In the “Letter of Operation” the applicant states they want the car wash open for a 12 hour period of time, 7:00 a.m. is the earliest they may open. Police Department GENERAL CONDITIONS 70 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): • 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power poles, street lights, and trees. • 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 17 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 71 No public water main or public water facilities shall be installed in private alleys or paseo areas. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 72 No public water mains or laterals allowed under parking stalls or parking lots. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 73 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL listed meter, Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator Register, no equals. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 74 The property owner is responsible to remove and relocate any traffic signal poles and equipment at the intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, if necessary, at the OWNERS expense. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 75 Hours of Operation for the carwash facility shall be restricted to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. seven days a week. Any changes to the facility’s hours of operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 76 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 77 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division - 18 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 78 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded aga inst or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 79 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2021-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2021-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2019-00042) (2501-2525 EAST BALL ROAD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-100 to consolidate three parcels into two parcels for that certain real property located at 2501-2525 West Ball Road, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.86- acres in size and is developed with an approximate 17,000 square foot, 1-story commercial building. The Property is located in the C-G (General Commercial) zone and is, therefore, subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial zones) of the Code. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General Commercial land uses; and WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-100 is proposed in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06035 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00148, now pending, which, together with the Project, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project". WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newson issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act -related provisions of Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeing to observe and to address the local legislative body; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 the Planning Commission did hold a teleconferencing public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on Janu ary 20, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-00100 and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, on April 12, 2021, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"), to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed Tentative Parcel Map 2020-100, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and - 2 - PC2021-*** WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for "projects", as that term is defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of a separate resolution concurrently with but prior in time to this Resolution, this Planning Commission has fo und and determined that the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request to consolidation of lots, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The proposed consolidation from three lots to two, including its design and improvements, and with the conditions imposed herein is consistent with the General Commercial land use designation in the Anaheim General Plan and the development standards contained in the "C-G" General Commercial Zone in that the proposed parcel map will consolidate three lots into two lot s for the purpose of constructing a convenience store with gas and alcohol sales and a new car wash facility. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the proposed zoning and the existing General Plan land use designation. 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and size of the proposed development in that this flat lot is currently developed with a commercial center and is of adequate size to be developed in accordance with the C-G zone development standards. 3. The lot consolidation, with the conditions imposed, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified on the site in that no environmental impacts are anticipated as part of the future development of a convenience store and carwash facility on this property. 4. The lot consolidation, or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, since any new structures and associated site improvements will be constructed on the property in compliance with the conditions imposed and other related Code requirements in that the future development of a convenience store with gas and alcohol sales and a carwash facility will be subject to all City code requirements for demolition and construction. 5. The lot consolidation or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed project site in that the parcel map is conditioned to be submitted for review and approval to the City of Anaheim and the Orange County Surveyor and then shall be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder prior to issuance of building permits; and - 3 - PC2021-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-100, subject to and contingent upon the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 12, 2021. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2021-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 12, 2021, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of April, 2021. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2021-*** - 6 - PC2021-*** EXHIBIT “B” TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 (DEV2019-00042) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO PARCEL MAP APPROVAL 1 Prior to parcel map recordation, the property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate in a signed deed to the City of Anaheim; i) an easement 69-feet in width, measured from the street centerline, along the property frontage on Ball Road; ii) an easement 49-feet in width, measured from the street centerline, along the frontage on Sunkist Street; and iii) the corner cutback dedication at the corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street for road, public utilities, and other public purposes. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 2 All existing structures in conflict with the proposed parcel lines shall be demolished. The developer shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division prior to any demolition work. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 3 The developer shall execute a maintenance covenant with the City of Anaheim in a form that is approved by the City Engineer and the City Attorney for the private improvements including but not limited to private utilities, sewers, drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation, private street lights, etc. in addition to maintenance requirements established in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as applicable to the project. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the parcel map. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 4 The applicant shall execute a Subdivision Agreement and submit security in an amount acceptable to the City Engineer to guarantee construction of the public improvements required herein. Security deposit shall be in accordance to City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The agreement shall be recorded concurrently with the parcel map. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 5 The vehicular access rights to Ball Road and Sunkist Street shall be released and relinquished to the City of Anaheim, except at approved driveways. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 6 The parcel map shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim, Public Works Development Services Division and to the Orange County Surveyor for technical correctness review and approval. Public Works Department, Development Services Division - 7 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 7 The developer shall submit improvement plans for the construction of required public improvements, to the Public Works Development Services Division for review, approval and to determine the bond amounts. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 8 Provide a Monumentation Bond in an amount specified in writing by a Licensed Land Surveyor of Record. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 9 Comply with all applicable requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works Department, Development Services Division GENERAL 10 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decisio n, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 11 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 12 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 20, 2021 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06035 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 LOCATION: 2501-2525 West Ball Road APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Anaheim Care LLC represented by Shira Zaghi. The property owner is 5G LLC represented by Morrie Golcheh. This application was originally submitted in September of 2019 with authorization from the previous property owner. The current owner acquired title of the property in April, 2020. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to construct a new 24-hour convenience market with gas sales and an express carwash with ancillary vacuums, (ii) an associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit off-premises sales of alcoholic beverages, and (iii) a tentative parcel map to consolidate three parcels into two lots. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 32, Infill Development ) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06035, Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00148, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-100. BACKGROUND: The 1.86-acre property is developed with a 1-story, 17,000 square foot commercial building that is currently occupied. The property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone. The General Plan designates this property for General Commercial land uses. The property is surrounded by single family residences to the north, a gas station to the west across Sunkist Street, an office building and single family residences to the south across Ball Road, and the southbound off-ramp from the 57 Orange Freeway to the east. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a new 2,950 sq. ft. convenience store with gas sales, with the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption, and an associated 3,100 sq. ft. gas canopy structure with six (6)-fuel dispenser islands. A separate 4,381 sq. ft., automated carwash facility with vacuum stalls is proposed to be constructed on the east side of the site. Both the convenience store and carwash buildings would be 20-feet in height. The project also involves the consolidation of three parcels into two for the purpose of constructing the two uses on separate lots. ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 January 20, 2021 Page 2 of 9 The consolidation of the lots would occur through the approval of a tentative parcel map and eventual recordation of a Parcel Map. The convenience store and fuel pump canopy would be located on the west side of the site closer to the intersection of Sunkist Street and Ball Road, with the carwash building located east of the convenience store closer to the freeway off-ramp. The site plan below depicts the general layout of the project. SITE PLAN The carwash building is designed in an east -west configuration with queuing lanes on the north (rear) of the building and vacuum stalls on the south (front ) of the building. On-site circulation for the carwash would involve cars proceeding easterly along the south side of the building to access the queuing lanes on the north side. Customers would then circle back into the carwash entry travelling easterly through the carwash tunnel. Once completed, customers would then circle back westerly on the south side of the building and either stop in one of the vacuum stalls or exit the property. Vehicular access to the site would be provided from two driveways on Ball Road and one driveway on Sunkist Street. Access to and from the project site on Ball Road will require a right-turn in/right -turn out traffic movement given the presence of a six lanes of westbound traffic on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements. Access from Sunkist Street would allow for right -turn and left -turn movements. A total of 35 shared parking spaces are proposed for the project site which includes 15 spaces at the convenience market (including 6 spaces allotted from the pump islands), and 20 spaces at the carwash (including 17 vacuum spaces). Proposed hours of operation for the convenience store and gas sales would be 24-hours with carwash hours from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily. There would be 3-5 staff present during the carwash business hours, depending on demand. Employees would park on the east side of the carwash building and in available stalls at the convenience store. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 January 20, 2021 Page 3 of 9 The proposed 20-foot high convenience store and 18-foot high ancillary gas canopy are designed with cement plaster finishes, split face veneer block, an aluminum canopy, and storefront window system. SOUTH ELEVATION (Ball Road) The proposed 20-foot high carwash building is designed with stucco panels, split face block and brick, foam cornices and accents, an aluminum frame glass storefront, and a standing seam metal roof. All signage will require separate review and approval of building permits. A 9-foot high sound wall is designed as part of the building near the tunnel exit as well as an 8-foot high masonry wall along the north property line abutting the single-family homes to mitigate noise impacts from the carwash building. SOUTH ELEVATION (Ball Road) FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit : Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 January 20, 2021 Page 4 of 9 The Municipal Code permits convenience stores, gas sales, off-premises sales of alcohol, and carwash facilities in the C-G zone subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in order to determine compatibility with surrounding land uses. An analysis of on-site circulation, traffic, parking, noise and compatibility, as well as information on community outreach related to the project is described in more detail below. Traffic/Queuing: A Traffic Impact Analysis (Attachment 8) was prepared by Ganddini Group, Inc. to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed project and to identify measures necessary to mitigate potentially significant impacts. The report also included a queuing analysis to identify the queuing demand for the carwash. The traffic study indicates that the project will generate approximately 102 net new trips during the AM peak hour, 124 net new trips during the PM peak hour, and 1,507 net new daily trip s. All intersections in the study area are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project conditions, except for the project’s driveways at Ball Road that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour. These driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only given the presence of a six lanes of westbound traffic on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements. While southbound right turn movements from the Project site experience delay, these southbound right - turning vehicles can queue within the project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. Based on the established thresholds of significance, the project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions. The project would be consistent with the City’s General Plan’s Circulation Element’s goals and policies, and would not result in significant traffic impacts or required mitigation measures. The queuing analysis included surveys during peak traffic generating hours on one weekday and one Saturday at several locations with similar carwash facilities. The 95th percentile queue was calculated for these sites which represents the maximum amount of vehicles stacked behind the carwash tunnel 95 percent of the time or less. Separate empirical data from three existing carwash facilities was obtained with field surveys of drive-thru queuing lanes at 15-minute intervals on a weekday and weekend. The 85th percentile queue was calculated for those sites. The analysis for this project took the average peak hour 95th/85th percentile queue which resulted in four (4) vehicles on a weekday and nine (9) vehicles on a Saturday. The maximum number of vehicles identified was 18 vehicles. A queue of nine (9) vehicles would require 180 feet (9 vehicles x 20 feet per vehicle) of queue length. As designed, the carwash lanes would allow for 33 vehicles with an additional queue area for nine (9) more vehicles without impacting traffic flow on Ball Road. The study concludes that there will be adequate queuing capacity provided for the carwash site. Parking: A total of 35 parking spaces are proposed for the site which includes 15 spaces for the convenience market (including 6 spaces allotted from the pump islands), and 20 spaces for the carwash (including 17 vacuum spaces). Convenience stores with gas sales require four spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. Based on the size of the convenience store, 12 spaces are required. The Municipal Code does not specify parking standards for carwash facilities and requires the submittal of a parking demand study to determine the parking requirement. The parking analysis included in the Ganddini Traffic Analysis contained empirical parking data from three existing carwash facilities, including the Rapids Express Carwash on Tustin Avenue in the City of Orange. Field surveys of parking demand were conducted in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 8:00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 January 20, 2021 Page 5 of 9 PM during a typical weekday and a Saturday. The analysis concluded that the maximum peak demand ranged between 13-20 parked vehicles. The maximum hourly average for the weekday counts was 14.3 parked vehicles with the maximum hourly 85th percentile parking demand of 19.1 during the AM peak period. The Saturday hourly average was 18.0 parked vehicles with the maximum hourly 85th percentile parking demand at 20.4 parked vehicles during the AM peak period. The conclusions of the study indicate the typical parking demand is estimated to be approximately 21 vehicles during peak periods based on the 85th percentile parking demand for the carwash facility. It should be noted that during periods where no vacuum spaces are available, customers will be required to leave the site. A shared parking arrangement between the convenience store and carwash uses will provide sufficient parking for employees and customers including three stalls east of the carwash building, and nine provided at the convenience store. A condition of approval has been included requiring a shared parking agreement be approved prior to issuance of building permits. Based on the parking analysis provided, staff believes that the number of on-site parking spaces is adequate to accommodate the proposed convenience store and carwash uses without impact to the surrounding public streets or properties. Noise: With the proximity of the proposed project to adjacent residential uses immediately north, an acoustical study was prepared by Veneklasen Associates, Inc. (Attachment 7) to determine compliance with the city’s noise standards. The study included an assessment of the existing and future sound levels as caused by traffic, carwash activity, and any mechanical equipment for the convenience store compared to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The analysis assumed an 8- foot high barrier (block wall) along the back property line, a 9-foot high, 25-foot long barrier at the exit of the carwash tunnel near the blowers, a 5-foot shield from future rooftop mechanical equipment on the roof of the convenience store, and cars idling at the carwash queue. Veneklasen prepared the Noise Study based on two interpretations of the Anaheim Municipal Code: 1) Where existing ambient noise levels matches or exceeds the 60 dBA limit established by the ordinance, then a new maximum allowable exterior standard would become 5 dBA above the existing ambient noise level; or 2) Where only noise generated by the future project itself is taken into account and must comply with the 60 dBA requirement established in the Anaheim Municipal Code. For this interpretation, traffic noise has been excluded from the modeling since the project would need to comply with the City’s 60 dBA requirement without the influence of existing noise sources already present at the site. The analysis completed on Interpretation #1 concluded that existing traffic noise along Ball Road is the primary noise source at the property line to the north, and modeled levels are compliant with the City’s requirements. This establishes that the predicted levels as caused by equipment fro m the convenience store and carwash alone (i.e. without traffic contribution from Ball Road) would be less than or equal to 59 dBA at both the first and second floors of the property line to the north. The analysis for Interpretation #2 (project only; no traffic noise included) concluded that noise generated as a result of the proposed project towards all resident’s 1st and 2nd floors meet the maximum Anaheim Municipal Code requirements of 60 dBA. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 January 20, 2021 Page 6 of 9 The Veneklasen study was peer-reviewed by Placeworks, one of the city’s on-call environmental consultants, to review the methodology and analysis and verify Veneklasen’s conclusions. The analysis has been reviewed with final conclusions accepted by Placeworks. Staff believes that the project is designed in a manner that is sensitive to the adjacent residential properties with the required noise mitigation of a new 8-foot high masonry wall along the common property line, a 9- foot high, 25-foot long sound wall at the carwash tunnel exit, and 5-foot high shields from future rooftop equipment on the convenience store. These improvements and sound barriers will minimize noise impacts to levels compliant with city noise standards. Community Outreach. The applicant held a Community Meeting at the Sunkist Public Library back on December 4, 2019 to introduce the proposed project and receive feedback. Over 100 people attended the meeting, many of whom expressed their concerns. The majority of the comments revolved around the loss of the Jagerhaus German Restaurant that has operated at that location for over 40 years. Since the community meeting over a year ago, the applicant has approached homeowners located directly north of the project site to discuss their concerns over the project and has been in negotiations with the business owner of the Jagerhaus to relocate the restaurant. According to the applicant, the owners identified noise and traffic as the primary concerns resulting from the proposed project. They noted the difference between what is the occasional use of the driveway at the rear of the existing commercial center and the proposed uses which would generate more noise and activity. The applicant/owner provides a summary (Attachment 14) of their outreach to their tenants, adjacent neighbors to the north, and to the surrounding community. The summary consists of information and written correspondence between those parties, and the extent of their outreach. It also includes information on the rent roll for the existing commercial center and a letter of support from former Mayor Pro Tem Lucille Kring. During this application review process, staff and the Planning Commission have received numerous inquiries and email correspondence from interested parties on the status and support for the Jagerhaus restaurant (see Attachment 15). Over 500 emails were received before the printing of this report, with the majority requesting that the Planning Commission keep the Jagerhaus Restaurant and other businesses in the center and deny the proposed development. A summary of issues cited in the emails include: • An abundance of convenience stores, gas stations and carwashes in the immediate vicinity and there is no need for similar uses • Putting the small businesses in the current plaza out of business • Traffic congestion already exists; project will create more traffic (safety concern) • Forcing Jagerhaus Restaurant, an Anaheim institution/landmark to close and/or move • Allow Jagerhaus to expand and remodel with an outdoor dining area (bier garten). • Noise and pollution impacts to the residents behind the carwash. • Potential impacts from homelessness/loitering CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 January 20, 2021 Page 7 of 9 Public Convenience or Necessity: State law requires a determination of public convenience or necessity when an alcoholic beverage license is requested for a property located in a police reporting district with a crime rate above the City average or when there is an overconcentration in the number of ABC licenses within a census tract. The Anaheim Police Department indicates that this property is located within Police Reporting District No. 1829, which has a crime rate that is below the citywide average; however, the crime rate within ¼ mile of this property is 30% above the citywide average based upon calls for service. The Police Department also indicates that this property is located within Census Tract No. 863.06 which has a population of 3,658. This census tract allows for two off-sale licenses, and there are presently 3 licenses in the tract. The proposed use requires such a determination as a result of an overconcentration in the number of licenses and above average crime rate. The attached statement of operation for determination of public convenience or necessity by the applicant indicates that the sale of beer and wine would be incidental relative to the range of products offered in the convenience store. The standard condition of approval in the draft resolution would permit the beer and wine display area to be up to 25 percent of the total display area in the building. In addition, the beer and wine will be sold within a convenience market located on major arterial highways. The beer and wine sales are intended to be a convenience to the consumer who visits this location to purchase gasoline and/or other general merchandise within the convenience store. The recommended conditions of approval require monitoring of the site to prevent on-site consumption. The sale of beer and wine is anticipated to be a minor accessory component of the store. Based upon these reasons, staff recommends approval of this application. Tentative Parcel Map: Before the Planning Commission may approve the tentative parcel map, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed consolidation of the property, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim. 2) That the proposed consolidation of the property, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-100, including their design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning and development standards of the “C-G” Commercial Zone. 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development of the proposed project. 4) That the consolidation, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-100, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 5) That the consolidation, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-100, or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6) That the consolidation, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2020-100, or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 January 20, 2021 Page 8 of 9 A tentative parcel map is required to consolidate the three existing lots into two lots. The proposed consolidation would create two new lots that would meet the minimum lot requirements for commercially-zoned properties. By consolidating the lots, the new uses would be located on separate lots and would comply with all development standards in the Commercial zone including setbacks and parking. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed tentative parcel map. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32 (In-fill Development). Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in- fill development meeting the conditions described in Section 15332. These conditions include that the proposed project is (a) consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; (b) occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; (d) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and, (e) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The CEQA checklist, attached to this staff report as Attachment 6, provides evidence that the proposed project meets these conditions. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that as designed and with the proposed conditions imposed, the convenience market and carwash uses would be compatible with the surrounding commercial and residential land uses. The proposed project is consistent with the General Commercial zoning for the property and will be designed to ensure that vehicular queuing and circulation, parking, and noise generated by the uses do not impact surrounding properties. The market and carwash will provide a convenience to customers to get their vehicle fueled, washed, and to purchase everyday necessities. The conditions of approval relating to restrictions on beer and wine packaging, displays, signage, property maintenance and on-site consumption, for the requested license will assure that the use would not be detrimental to the area. The proposed number of parking spaces would be adequate to serve the proposed uses. Based upon these reasons, staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Wayne Carvalho Niki Wetzel, AICP Contract Planner Deputy Planning and Building Director Attachments: 1. Draft CUP and PCN Resolution 2. Draft SUBPM Resolution 3. Development Summary 4. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-060 35, PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 January 20, 2021 Page 9 of 9 5. Tentative Parcel Map 6. Class 32 Infill Exemption Environmental Checklist 7. Acoustical Studies 8. Traffic Impact, Parking and Queuing Analysis 9. Project Narrative 10. Letter of Justification for Carwash 11. Justification for Public Convenience or Necessity 12. Photographs 13. Anaheim Video Walkthrough (original concept) 14. Applicant’s Outreach and Correspondence 15. Correspondence from Interested Parties C-G DEV 2019-00042 RETAIL C-G RETAIL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM - 4 FO U R P L E X C-G SERVICE STATION RM-4 THE VILLAGER APARTMENTS 190 DU RM-4 TRIPLEX RM-4 TRIPLEX O-L MEDICAL OFFICE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS - 3 SI N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RM - 4 FO U R P L E X RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SING L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM - 4 FO U R P L E X RS - 3 SI N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RM - 4 FO U R P L E X RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE E BALL RD S S U N K I S T S T S HILDA ST E RILES CIR E ALKI PL S C A R L S T E WHIDBY LN E OMEGA AVE S S U N B U R S T W A Y S L A R A M I E S T E HILDA PL E CLIFPARK WAY E ALKI PL E. BALL RD S. S U N K I S T S T S . E A S T S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. HOWELL AVE 2501-2525 East Ball Road DEV No. 2019-00042 Subject Property APN: 253-072-18 253-072-19 253-072-14 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2019 E BALL RD S S U N K I S T S T S HILDA ST E RILES CIR E ALKI PL S C A R L S T E WHIDBY LN E OMEGA AVE S S U N B U R S T W A Y S L A R A M I E S T E HILDA PL E CLIFPARK WAY E ALKI PL E. BALL RD S. S U N K I S T S T S . E A S T S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. HOWELL AVE 2501 East Ball Road DEV No. 2019-00042 Subject Property APN: 253-072-18 253-072-19 253-072-14 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2019 PROJECT SUMMARY 7-11 CONVENIENCE MARKET GAS STATION/ RAPIDS EXPRESS CARWASH 2501-2525 E. BALL RD Development Standards C-G Standards Proposed Project Site Area None 1.86 acres, 81,022 sq. ft. (3 parcels) Building Area N/A 2,945 sq. ft. convenience market 4,566 4,381 sq. ft. carwash building 3,100 sq. ft. gas canopy Approx. 10,426 sq. ft. total Floor Area Ratio 0.50 maximum 0.13 Building Height 75 feet If within 150’ of SFR zone: 20-50 feet 1 story (20 feet) 20’-0” (7-11 Market) 17’-6” (Gas Canopy) 20’-0” (Carwash) Landscape Setbacks: Abutting any arterial highway Abutting Freeway off-ramp Abutting Any Residential Zone 15 feet, as measured from the ultimate right-of-way line 10 feet 10 feet, with trees planted on maximum 20-foot centers to provide an effective visual screen between the C-G and Residential zones 15-ft. along Ball Rd. 15-ft . along Sunkist St. 17-ft. at corner 10 feet 10 feet Structural Setbacks Abutting arterial highway Abutting Any Residential Zone 15’ to Ball Rd. 15’ to Sunkist St. 20’ to north (SFR zone) 51’ to north (if 2-stories/greater than 28’ in height) 67’ to Ball Rd. (7-11 Market) 40’ to Ball Rd. (Gas Canopy) 43’ to Ball Rd. (Vacuum Canopy) 31’ to Sunkist St. (Gas canopy) 25’ to Res to north (7-11 Market) 32.62’ to north (Carwash) 60’ to north (Gas canopy) Parking 33 total 12 spaces Gas Station in Conjunction with Accessory Convenience Store: 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA of the convenience store. Up to 50 percent of the pump islands may be counted as parking stalls. Carwash requires Parking Demand Study - 21 req’d) 35 total 15 spaces for 7 -11 Market [8 standard spaces, 1 H/C spaces, plus 12 fuel pump spaces (50% can be counted towards parking) + loading space] 20 total for Carwash 17 vacuum + 3 standard spaces ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 01 - SITE PLAN New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln Saturday, December 5, 2020 N NOT TO SCALE Aerial Photo / Site Plan NOT TO SCALE (Street View E Ball Rd) F F F DISP 2DISP 4 9 DISP 6 10 DISP 1DISP 3DISP 5 1112 78 56 34 12 CANOPY EDGE CANOPY EDGE CA N O P Y E D G E CA N O P Y E D G E SLAB EDGE SLAB EDGE SL A B E D G E SL A B E D G E 24x24 24x24 24x24 3,222 sq ftCOVERAGE 62'-71/2" S.B.155'-91/2" O.A. BUILDING 85' O.A. BUILDING 66 '-3 1 /2 " S .B . 37 ' O . A . B U I L D I N G 32 '-8 1 /2 " S .B . 139'-6" 14'250'-91/2"10'-8"19'-9" 1'-6" 12'16' 5' 15 ' 28 ' - 7 " 29 ' - 9 " 11 ' 3' - 9 " 16 ' 22 ' 10 ' 15 ' 27 ' - 6 " 20 ' - 1 " 10 '-8 1 /2 " 11 ' 30 ' 11 ' - 8 " 10 ' 17'-61/2" 29'-4" 12 ' - 8 " 20 ' - 1 0 " 9' - 1 " 34'-7" 5'4"25' 5' 19'-3"18'-8"24'-51/2"5' 4' - 8 " 9' - 3 " 3' - 6 " 9' - 3 " 25'-6" 10 ' 50' 3' 10 ' 2' 10' 18 ' 8 ' - 6 " 36 '-7 1 /2 " S .B . 1'12'1' 13 ' - 1 0 " 1' - 5 " R 35' R 35' R 15' R 10' R 10' R 25' R 21' R 35' R 10'R 10' R 21' 4,381 sq ft CAR WASH TUNNEL P.O.S. VENDING OFFICE EQUIPMENT VACUUM AREA (17) SPACES 12' O.C. MONUMENT SIGN TRASH EN T R Y EX I T (3) EMPLOYEE PARKINGC-STORETRASH EQUIP. GAS STATION VAC TRX 48" WIDE UNOBSTRUCTED WALKWAY Jo b # : Sc a l e : Da t e : Dr a w n B y : Ch e c k e d B y : Re v . # Da t e D e s c r i p t i o n 07 / 1 6 / 2 0 1 9 1/ 4 " - 1 ' - 0 " Do c u m e n t s p r e p a r e d b y C o r e St a t e s G r o u p a r e t o b e u s e d o n l y fo r t h e s p e c i f i c p r o j e c t a n d s p e c i f i c us e f o r w h i c h t h e y a r e i n t e n d e d . An y e x t e n s i o n o f u s e t o o t h e r pr o j e c t s , b y o w n e r o r a n y o t h e r pa r t y , w i t h o u t t h e e x p r e s s e d , wr i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C o r e S t a t e s Gr o u p i s d o n e a t t h e u s e r ' s o w n r i s k . If u s e d i n a w a y o t h e r t h a n t h a t sp e c i f i c a l l y i n t e n d e d , u s e r w i l l h o l d Co r e S t a t e s G r o u p h a r m l e s s f r o m a l l cl a i m s a n d l o s s e s . LAYOUT #3 FL O O R P L A N L A Y O U T K. Y E R R Y J. T O O K E DISCLAIMER THIS FLOOR PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED WITH THE ASSUMPTION THAT ALL REFRIGERATED EQUIPMENT IS REMOTE-COOLED PER 7-ELEVEN PROTO. THE AOR "ARCHITECT OF RECORD" / EOR "ENGINEER OF RECORD" IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE CONCEPT PLAN COMPANY (CORE STATES GROUP) IF REFRIGERATION DESIGN WILL BE NON-PROTYPICAL SO THAT FLOOR PLAN MAY BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. SE I . 2 7 0 4 9 7- 1 1 # 1 0 4 3 1 4 6 NE C B A L L & S U N K I S T AN A H E I M , C A 9 2 8 0 6 7- E L E V E N , I N C . 32 0 0 H A C K B E R R Y R O A D , I R V I N G , T E X A S 7 5 0 6 3 1043146 ANAHEIM, CA - GROUND UP GENERAL •ROLLER GRILLS 02 •SANDWICH CASE 6' OAC •VAULT DOORS 12 •LOW TEMP DOORS 00 •ICE MERCH DOORS 00 •NOVELTY CASE 01 •BAKERY CASE 01 •SLURPEE BARRELS 08 •FUELING Y •BEER Y •WINE Y •LIQUOR N •FOOD PROGRAM N •COUNTY ORANGE MERCHANDISE •GONDOLA UNITS 36 •END CAPS 05 •LOW WALLS 05 •HIGH WALLS 00 ••TOTAL 46 ••POWER WINGS 00 BACKROOM •OVERHEAD SHELVING 30' •FLOOR SHELVING 33' BUILDING •TOTAL AREA 2,945 SQFT •SALES FLOOR 278 SQFT = 02 PERSONS •MERCHANDISE 1,591 SQFT = 27 PERSONS •BACKROOM 308 SQFT = 02 PERSONS •OFFICE 64 SQFT = 01 PERSONS •RESTROOM 85 SQFT = 00 PERSONS •OCCUPANCY LOAD 32 PERSONS •TRAVEL DISTANCE (<200') 65'-6" •COMMON PATH (<75') 90'-8" •RESTROOMS REQ'D 01 •EXITS REQ'D 02 •DRINKING FOUNTAINS N •REFRIGERATION REMOTE DEVIATIONS •ROOF ACCESS •LARGER ELEC. ROOM FOR ADDITIONAL FUELING PANELS •10' LOW PROFILE CIGARETTE DISPLAY •UNISEX RESTROOM •STAND ALONE LOW TEMP AND ICE APPROVED 07.16.2019 NOT APPROVED LAYOUT INFORMATION WALL TYPES N COOLER VAULT WALL NEW INTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION NEW EXTERIOR WALL (NICHIHA & SIPS) PROTO 2019.01: 02.28 12 7 0 0 H i l l c r e s t R o a d Su i t e 1 9 2 Da l l a s , T X 7 5 2 3 0 21 4 . 3 7 7 . 5 0 6 0 co r e - s t a t e s . c o m GR O U P CO R E S T A T E S , I N C . 70'-0" 43 ' - 0 " 262263 106 842 61 79 846 16 12 17 845 844 843 28 66 84 83 85 58 46 911 19 82 906 84 45 24 5'-8" 4' C A N D Y R A C K 891 2' C A N D Y R A C K 884 4' C A N D Y R A C K 891 76 234234234234234234235237238239245246146 927 927 468 311 SALES POS POS PR O P O S E D G L A Z I N G 7 5 8 4 9 247 332 71 113 297309309 399398 399397399398 399397 77 264 124 267295329330 799 69169 292 176 373374374 172 799 799333143143 167 168 22 105112174250 112 378379 303 70 70 307 377 174 BEVERAGE WALL 4'-1" 925 5' - 0 " 120535 535 119 13 13 266 372 102 851 273 287 327 276 275 288288288288 331 921 65 65360 11 BUN DRAWER 917 74 68 WASTE 916 269275268 290 290290 923 7373 466467467 327 327288288288288 368 369 327 289 288288288288 293 7'-6" 7'-2" 6' - 1 " CONDIMENT ISLAND NOVELTY 281 280 F E M - C H I P S 281 281 MERCHANDISE 28 2 28 3 4' - 7 " 281 281 281191 7'-6" 281 281 3' - 8 " 2 8 2 2 8 3 281 281 281 5'-0" UNISEX 4 7 9 47 7 5'-0" 4' - 6 " 852148148 NEWS 103103 3' - 1 0 " 103103 1 6 ATM FLOORSPINNER:SUNGLASSESGLOVESUMBRELLAS CI G ' S C I G ' S I T P O T P 23 3 53 2 53 3 5 3 5 1 1 7 OFFICE 11 8 4' - 6 " 5'-11" 281 28 2 28 3 3' - 8 " 3' - 8 " 4 7 6 220 220 2 5 8 4 0 14 5 1 4 4 1 4 5 3 3 3 7 5 5 1 5 3 4 23 6 0 2 3'-0" 5 3 0 6 0 0 856 8 3 8 8 3 8 14 5 840 1 4 5 1 4 5 6' - 0 " ELECTRICAL BACKROOM PROPOSED GLAZING 5'-9" 5 1 1 5 1 1 CO2 N2 N2 868 868 3'-2" 8 6 9 8 2 1 ICE 3' - 0 " 855 5 5 281 28 2 28 3 281 281 103 281 281 281 3' - 8 " 7'-6" 864 865866 867 COOLER VAULT 36 ' - 6 " 405 529 627 340 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529 529529 9'-1" 944 944944 935 950 80 4 926 125 821 LOW TEMP653663664 655 656 307 377 A1.00 A 3 . 1 0 02 - BUILDING FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln Saturday, December 5, 2020 S Section N N Elevation S S Elevation W W Elevation E E Elevation 139'-6" 29'-4" 12 ' - 8 " 20 ' - 1 0 " 9' - 1 " 34'-7" 5'4"25' 5'18'-8"24'-51/2"5' 4' - 8 " 9' - 3 " 3' - 6 " 9' - 3 " 25'-6" 4,381 sq ft TUNNEL EXIT 3070 METAL DOOR ACCESSIBLE ALL GENDER RESTROOM UTILITY TRENCH CONVEYOR TRENCH OFFICE / FLIGHT DECK OFFICE / MEZZANINE ACCESS SPIRAL METAL STAIR CARD READER SLANTED STOREFRONT WINDOWS (TYP) MAIN STRUCTURE COLUMN 3070 METAL DOOR 3670 SERVICE DOOR CAR WASH TUNNEL (EQUIPMENT BY CAR WASH MANUFACTURER) EQUIPMENT ROOM WITH MEZZANINE ABOVE BUILT WITH STEEL OPEN GRATES ROOF PROJECTION FULL HEIGHT WIND BREAK SEPARATION WALL TUNNEL ENTRANCE 3070 METAL DOOR (2) PAY STATIONS PRICE BOARD (2) AUTOMATIC GATES FIX WINDOWS 3070 ALUMINUM DOOR WITH GLASS RAIN DOWNSPOUTS (TYP) EDGE OF ROOF PROJECTION 11'-6 H CMU ENCLOSURE WITH A ROLL-UP DOOR AND 3080 DOOR SLANTED STOREFRONT WINDOWS & LOUVERS(TYP) VENDING MEZZANINE ACCESS METAL LADDER DRIVEWAY LIMITS RAIN DOWNSPOUTS (TYP) WASH AREA DRY AREAPREP AREA 9'-0" H CMU SOUND WALL SCE TRANSFORMER CENTRAL VACUUM EQUIPMENT 1 0 0 ' 9 0 ' 6 0 ' 5 0 ' 4 0 ' 3 0 ' 2 0 ' 1 0 ' 0 ' 1 5 0 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 2 0 ' 1 1 0 ' E-C2036 115' DUAL TRANSPORTER 30" BELT E-EM-208-LCD ENTRANCE MODULE W/LCD DISPLAY E-P2007-K BUG, BODY, & BACKEND AUTOPREP ARCH (TRIPLE PRESOAK W/CTA) E-C-MG-Dg-3x10 MOLDED PIT GRATING E-C-SG-Dg-3X10 SOLID PIT GRATING E-P2011 UNDERBODY BLASTER E-M1001-NC-G ALL-IN-ONE EXTREME CLEAN COMBO MODULE-NO CLOTH E-T1001 RAINBOW COAT APPLICATOR KIT E-P-RHL RED HOT LAVA APPLICATOR KIT E-F-RB-2-LR1RAIN BAR 2 ROW W/LADDER RACK BRACKETS E-HW-204 SIMONIZ HOT WAX AND SHINE W/RAIN BAR APP. E-F2016-LG BARE TOMMY ARCH (7) E-B2008 DIRECT MOUNT BLOWER ARCH (15) P-B-BB-3 HORIZONTAL BLOWER BRACE BAR 3' (16) E-B-BP-10-Red BLOWER PRODUCER 10hp E-F2010-K HP RINSE TEARDROP ARCH KIT E-F-RB-4-LR1 RAIN BAR 4 ROW W/ LADDER RACK BRACKETS E-F2036-K FIXED ROCKER BLASTER E-H2005-K FLIPPING WHEEL BLASTER E-F-ICEDTD TURTLE WAX ICE TEARDROP ARCH E-M1001-NC-G ALL-IN-ONE EXTREME CLEAN COMBO MODULE-NO CLOTH E-F-RB-2-LR1 RAIN BAR 2 ROW W/LADDER RACK BRACKETS E-F2001-K CURVED HANGING RINSE KITE-F2010 APPLICATOR ARCH-TEARDROP STYLE E-F2017-2 RINSE WALL RING E-F1007-LM-DB TIRE BLAZE APPLICATOR-LEG MOUNT E-B2009-NC-K DRYING REVERSE HUGGER KIT LADDER-RACK LADDER RACK SYSTEM E-SE-1005-2 RELAX/GO LED LIGHT STAND 1 0 ' 6 ' 2 5 ' - 6 " 1 ' - 6 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 2 ' - 6 " 3 ' 4 ' - 6 " 2 ' 4 ' 2 ' - 8 " 2 ' 5 ' 5 ' 3 ' 3 ' 3 ' 3 ' 3 ' 5 ' 5 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 0 ' 7 0 ' 8 0 ' 5 8 1 O t t a w a A v e . H o l l a n d , M I 4 9 4 2 3 P . 6 1 6 . 4 9 4 . 0 7 7 2 t o m m y c a r w a s h . c o m T o m m y C a r W a s h S y s t e m s C o p y r i g h t 2 0 1 5 A l l R i g h t s R e s e r v e d D a t e : E Q U I P M E N T L A Y O U T D R A W I N G # : T C W - 1 1 R A P I D S E X P R E S S 2 . 1 7 . 1 6 3 '-1 /2 " 10 ' LED WALL PACK LIGHTS GUTTER ACRYLITE ROOF PANELS STEEL BEAMS EXTRUTECH CAR WASH PANELS OFFICE / FLIGHT DECK SLANTED WALL CONVEYOR TRENCH FOOTINGS ROOF ACCESS CAR GATE PAY STATIONTW 17 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 19 '-2 1 /2 " 20 ' 9' FLASHING CAP (TYP) P.O.S. ALUMINUM WINDOWS WITH TEMPERED GLASS HVAC EQUIPMENT BEHIND 3' H PARAPET WALL AUTOMATIC GATE LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT ) CMU SOUND WALL 4" JOINT IN-FILL A BCDHA B TW C F E E 9' FLASHING CAP (TYP) ALUMINUM LOUVERS ALUMINUM PANELS SAME COLOR AS "B" LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT )CMU SOUND WALL 4" JOINT IN-FILL D B TW H BF BE E 19 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 10 ' 20 ' P.O.S. AUTOMATIC GATES RING AND OVERHEAD DOOR BY TOMMY WASH 2" STUCCO SCREED BA FC EG 12 ' 6' 17 '-9 1 /2 " 19 '-2 1 /2 " 9' 7' 4' RING AND OVERHEAD DOOR BY TOMMY WASH SUNBURST W/ 2" STUCCO SCREED LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT ) LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT ) 9' h X 25' L CMU SOUND WALLCLEAR ADA WALKWAY VACUUM CANOPY STALL F BCB EG 10'METAL FRAMED MONUMENT SIGN WITH CONCRETE BASE BUSINESS LOGO/NAME B N SCALE: 1" = 10' Floor Plan SCALE: 1" = 10' Section SCALE: 1" = 10' S Elevation SCALE: 1" = 10' N Elevation SCALE: 1" = 10' E Elevation SCALE: 1" = 10' W Elevation SCALE: 1" = 10' Monument Sign A 26 GA METAL TRIM OVER FOAM TIGER DRYLAC 38/60500 NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 B 30/30 STUCCO COLORTEK RAL 3001 (COLOR) C D STOREFRONT ALUMINUM FRAME LOW-E GLASS METALLIC SILVER E SPLIT - FACED CMU BLOCK RCP BLOCK & BRICK COLOR/STYLE CHARCOAL F METAL DOOR AND FRAME TIMELY CHARCOAL GRAY MATTE DESIGNER'S FOAM NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 26 GA STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF & FASCIA TIGER DRYLAC 38/60500 NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 G ACRYLITE HEATSTOP ACRYLIC ROOF PANEL CLEAR H LIST OF MATERIALS CAR WASH EQUIPMENT POWDER COATED STEEL BY TOMMY WASH - RAL 3001TW 12 ' 6 ' 17 ' - 9 1/ 2 " 19 ' - 2 1/ 2 " 9' 7' 4' RING AND OVERHEAD DOOR BY TOMMY WASH SUNBURST W/ 2" STUCCO SCREED LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) 9' h X 25' L CMU SOUND WALLCLEAR ADA WALKWAY VACUUM CANOPY STALL F BCB EG 03 - MISC SYSTEMS New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln Saturday, December 5, 2020 © 2015 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. Project Name Fixture Type Catalog # 06/09/15 DOE LIGHTING FACTS Department of Energy has verified representative product test data and results in accordance with its Lighting Facts Program. Visit www.lightingfacts.com for specific catalog strings. SMARTTEC™ - LSI drivers feature integral sensor which reduces drive current, when ambient temperatures exceed rated temperature. ENERGY SAVING CONTROL OPTIONS – DIM – 0-10 volt dimming enabled with controls by others. BLS – Bi-level switching responds a 120-277V signal from separate controller or sensor (by others). Low light level decreased to 30% maximum drive current. OCCUPANCY SENSOR (IMS) - Optional internal passive infrared motion sensor activates switching of luminaire light levels. High level light activated and increased to full bright in 1-2 seconds upon detection of motion. Low light level (30% maximum drive current) activated when target zone is absent of motion activity for ~ 2 minutes and ramps down (10-15 sec.) to low level. Sensor located on the front of optical assembly. Sensor optic has a detection cone of approximately 45°. Examples of detection - occurs 30’ out from a 30’ mounting height pole. EXPECTED LIFE - Minimum 60,000 hours to 100,000 hours depending upon the ambient temperature of the installation location. See LSI web site for specific guidance. LEDS - Select high-brightness LEDs in Cool White (5000K) or Neutral White (4000K) color temperature. 70 CRI. DISTRIBUTION/PERFORMANCE - Types 3, FT and 5. Exceptional uniformity creates bright environment at lower light levels. Improved backlight cutoff minimizes light trespass. HOUSING - One-piece, die-formed aluminum, weather-tight housing contains factory prewired driver and field connections. Extruded one-piece EPDM gasketed wiring access door (with safety lanyard) located underneath and utilizes tool-less thumbscrew fastener. OPTICAL UNIT - Clear tempered flat glass lens sealed to aluminum optics housing creates an IP67 rated, sealed optical unit (includes pressure-stabilizing breather). Optical unit is recessed into housing cavity and sealed to the housing with extruded one-piece EPDM gasket. Optical unit lanyard serves dual purposes of safety and provides positive ground between unit and housing. MOUNTING - Tapered rear design allows fixtures to be mounted in a quad pattern without the need for extension arms. Use with 3” reduced drilling pattern on round and square poles. A round pole plate (X4RPP, X5RPP) is required for mounting to round poles. Wall mount available by ordering wall mounting bracket (BKS-XBO-WM-*-CLR). See Accessory Ordering Information chart for all brackets. ELECTRICAL - A terminal block for attachment of incoming primary wiring is supplied. Two- stage surge protection (including separate surge protection built into electronic driver) meets IEEE C62.41.2-2002, Location Category C. Available with universal voltage power supply 120-277VAC (50/60Hz input), and 347-480 VAC. Optional twistlock photocell receptacle is available. Photocell must be ordered separately. DRIVER - Available in SS (Super Saver) and HO (High Output) drive currents (Drive currents are factory programmed). Components are fully encased in potting material for IP65 moisture resistance. Driver complies with IEC and FCC standards. Driver and key electronic components can easily be accessed. OPERATING TEMPERATURE - -40°C to +50°C (-40°F to +122°F). FINISH - Fixtures are finished with LSI’s DuraGrip® polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling. WARRANTY - LSI LED fixtures carry a limited 5-year warranty. PHOTOMETRICS - Please visit our web site at www.lsi-industries.com for detailed photometric data. SHIPPING WEIGHT (in carton) - 39 lbs. / 17.7 Kg LISTING - ETL listed to U.S. and International safety standards. Suitable for wet locations. For a list of the specific products in this series that are DLC listed, please consult the LED Lighting section of our website or the Design Lights website at www.designlights.org. LED AREA LIGHTS - AEROMAXTM MEDIUM (XAMU) US patent 7828456, 7952293, 8002428 and CAN 2693131 & 2701653 and US & Int'l. patents pending Type 3 Type FT Type 5 SS HO SS HO LIGHT OUTPUT - XAMU Lumens (Nominal)# ofLEDS Watts(Nominal) Co o l Wh i t e 13500 16500 12400 15000 14100 17300 13200 15800 12100 14800 11200 12500 139 176 139 176 128 128 128 128Ne u t r a l Wh i t e LED Chips are frequently updated therefore values may increase. This product, or selected versions of this product, meet the standards listed below. Please consult factory for your specific requirements. ARRAFunding Compliant wet location IP65IP67 Fixtures comply with ANSI C136.31-2010 American National Standard for Roadway Lighting Equipment - Luminaire Vibration 3G requirements. Baja Expree Carwash Site XAMU-FT-LED-128-HO-CW-UE-BRZ-IMS WITH 18' 4"X4" POLE The Philips Gardco 161 is an enlarged and enhanced version of the 121, providing performance capability up to that of 400w metal halide, while using considerably less energy. The 161 is designed for mounting heights from 15 to 20 feet, and may make it possible to reduce total pole requirements on a site due to the exceptional performance capability. The 161 style makes it a perfect companion to PureForm site luminaires. The sloped surface ribs of the die cast aluminum housing create a distinctly unique aesthetic element, and perform important functions in the Philips Gardco thermal management system. The high performance LED optical systems produce full cutoff performance, minimizing glare and light trespass. High performance, sleek profile L ED wall mount luminaire. 161 WALL SconcE AVAILABLE Q3 2013 Benefits • Exceptional performance can reduce pole requirements on a site • Motion response and control options available for additional energy savings • Performance equivalent to 400W HID while utilizing significantly less energy Features • Complements the 121 Wall sconce • Perfect companion to Philips Gardco PureForm site & area luminaires • Type 2, 3, and 4 optical distributions available • Full cutoff performance minimizes glare and light trespass © 2015 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. Project Name Fixture Type Catalog # 06/09/15 TYPICAL ORDER EXAMPLE: LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION XAMU FT LED 128 HO CW UE WHT PCR ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION1 (Accessories are field installed) Description LUMINAIRE EPA CHART - XAMU Single D180° D90° T90° TN120° Q90° 1.4 2.8 2.4 4.0 4.0 4.7 Note: House Side Shield adds to fixture EPA. Consult Factory. Prefix FinishColorTemperature XAMU LED 128 CW - Cool White (5000K) NW - Neutral White (4000K) Input Voltage UE - Universal Voltage (120-277) 347-480 - Universal Voltage (347-480V) BLK - Black BRZ - Bronze GPT - Graphite MSV - Metallic Silver PLP - Platinum Plus SVG - Satin Verde Green WHT - White Optional Sensor/OptionsOptional ControlsLightSourceDistribution# ofLEDs SS - Super Saver HO -High Ouput DriveCurrent 3 - Type III 5 - Type V FT - Forward Throw Sensor IMS - Integral Motion Sensor5 Options PCR - Photoelectric Control Receptacle6 Wireless Control System1,2 ((blank) - None PCM - Platinum Control System PCMH - Host/Satellite Platinum Control System GCM - Gold Control System GCMH - Host/Satellite Gold Control System DIM - 0-10 volt dimming (required for satellite fixtures) Stand-Alone Control (blank) - None DIM - 0-10 volt dimming3 (from external signal) BLS - Bi-level Switching4 (from external signal - required 120-277V controls system voltage) Order Number Description Order Number BKA-XBO-EC-6-CLR 6" Extension Arm 382136CLR BKS-XBO-WM-*-CLR Wall Mounting Bracket 382132CLR XAMU-HSS House Side Shield (Black only) 524670BLK7 X4RPP Round Pole Plate for 4" Poles 379967CLR X5RPP Round Pole Plate for 5" Poles 379968CLR PC120 Photocell for use with PCR option (120V) 1225148 PC208-277 Photocell for use with PCR option (208V, 240V, 277V) 1225158 PC347 Photocell for use with PCR option (347V) 1595168 PC480 Photocell for use with PCR option (480V) 12251808 FK120 Single Fusing (120V) FK1209 FK277 Single Fusing (277V) FK2779 DFK208, 240 Double Fusing (208V, 240V) DFK208,2409 DFK480 Double Fusing (480V) DFK4809 FK347 Single Fusing (347V) FK3479 PMOS120 120V Pole-Mount Occupancy Sensor 518030CLR10 PMOS208/240 208V, 240V Pole-Mount Occupancy Sensor 534239CLR10 PMOS277 277V Pole-Mount Occupancy Sensor 518029CLR10 PMOS480 480V Pole-Mount Occupancy Sensor 534240CLR10 FOOTNOTES: 1- For wireless controls information and accessories, see Controls section. 2- Requires a SiteManager and override switch. Not compatible with BLS or IMS option. 3- Not compatible with IMS or BLS option. 4- Not compatible with wireless controls system, DIM or IMS option. 5- Not compatible with wireless controls system, DIM or BLS option. 6- Photocell must be ordered separately. See Accessories. 7- House Side Shields add to fixture EPA. Consult factory. 8- Factory installed PCR option required. See Options. 9- Fusing must be located in the hand hole of pole. 10- To be used in conjunction with any of the PCM/GCM wireless controls systems in fixture. Consult factory. LED AREA LIGHTS - AEROMAXTM MEDIUM (XAMU) DIMENSIONS (shown with PCM/GCM controls) Front View Side View Bottom View 1-9/16"(39 mm) 6-3/8"(161 mm) 35-7/16"(900 mm) 5"(127 mm) 12-3/4"(324 mm) 18-5/16"(465 mm) XAMU HSS - House Side Shield Baja Expree Carwash Site XAMU-FT-LED-128-HO-CW-UE-BRZ-IMS WITH 18' 4"X4" POLE Dimensions Distribution Options Ordering information Prefix Distribution LED Wattage LED Type Voltage Finish Options 161-CWL 161-MR 161-DCC 161-DIM 161-APD 161-APD-MRI 2 Ty pe 2 3 Ty pe 3 4 Ty pe 4 350 mA 70W 64 LEDs 110W 96 LEDs 530 mA 130W 64 LEDs 170W 96 LEDs 700 mA 150W 64 LEDs 220W 96 LEDs CW 5700K NW 4000K WW 3000K UNV 120-277V HVU 3 47-480V 120 208 240 277 347 480 BRP Bronze BLP Black WP White NP Natural OC Optional Color SC Special Color F Fusing 120-277V DL Diffusing Lens PCB1 Button Photocell WS Surface mount conduit feed junction box SPR Surge Protection (120-277V) SPRH Surge Protection (347-480V) 1. Not available in 347-480V. 13.86” 35.2 cm 22.4” 56.89 cm 8.02” 20.37 cm 13.86” 35.2 cm 22.4” 56.89 cm 8.02” 20.37 cm 161 WALL SconcE © 2013 Koninklijke Philips Electronics n.V. All rights reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. Philips Lighting company 200 Franklin Square Drive Somerset, nJ 08873 Phone: 855-486-2216 www.philips.com/luminaires Philips Lighting company 281 Hillmount Road Markham ON, Canada L6C 2S3 Phone: 800-668-9008 www.philips.com/luminaires Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 AVAILABLE Q3 2013 SINGLE USER PALM ARCH AT ENDS OF PARKING SPACES DUAL USER PALM ARCH BETWEEN PARKING SPACES 6" OVERHEAD ALUMINUM TUBING BETWEEN ARCHES ADJUSTABLE CROSS BARS (11'-16') 16'-6'Lx7'-2"Wx4"H FLAT AND LEVEL FLOOR SPACE FOR VACUUM EQUIPMENT 6" SCHEDULE 40 SOLID CORE BURIED PVC PIPE 6" SCHEDULE 40 SOLID CORE BURIED BACKUP PVC PIPE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6" CLEAN OUT BACKUP PIPE STUB UP LOCATION 6" CLEAN OUT 6" CLEAN OUT GENERIC LOCATION OF PRODUCER ROOM F.G. 0' - 0"0' - 2 " 1' - 1"2' - 6" 0' - 6 " 0' - 1 0 " 3' - 4 " 4' - 9 " 6' - 0 " 8' - 1 " 8' - 1 0 " 9' - 5 " 11 ' - 0 " 14' - 1"1' - 10" 1' - 4" 2' - 2" 8' - 4 " 6" OVERHEAD ALUMINUM TUBING 4' LED LIGHT STRAND AIR GUN W/ AIR HOSE WASTE RECEPTACLE CREVICE VACUUM TOOL CLAW VACUUM TOOL MAT RACK 1 1/2"x15' VACUUM HOSE DUAL USER PALM ARCH LED Site LightingLED Wall Sconce Lighting NOT TO SCALE GENERIC CENTRAL VACUUM SYSTEM Point of Sale Vending Area Trash Enclosure Vacuum Area Sound Wall 04 - MATERIALS New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln Saturday, December 5, 2020 PROTOTYPE REFERENCE IMAGE RAL_3001_-_Signal_Red_grande A B C D E F G H LIST OF MATERIALSTW SHADE CLOTH - FABRIC TEXTILENE FR STEEL GRAY CANOPY LIGHT POLES CHARCOAL GRAY MATTE 26 GA METAL TRIM OVER FOAM TIGER DRYLAC 38/60500 NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 30/30 STUCCO COLORTEK RAL 3001 (COLOR) STOREFRONT ALUMINUM FRAME WITH LOW-E GLASS METALLIC SILVER SPLIT - FACED CMU BLOCK RCP BLOCK & BRICK COLOR/STYLE CHARCOAL METAL DOOR AND FRAME TIMELY CHARCOAL GRAY MATTE DESIGNER'S FOAM NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 26 GA STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF & FASCIA TIGER DRYLAC 38/60500 NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 ACRYLITE HEATSTOP ACRYLIC ROOF PANEL CLEAR POWDER COATED STEEL BY TOMMY WASH - RAL 3001 SIGN VACUUM STALLS 100.26100.28TC99.62FL99.76100.20TC99.51FL99.67100.30 100.15TC99.50FL99.60100.10TC99.47FL100.87 101.34100.86100.01TC99.38FL 100.0099.4999.55100.09TC99.40FL 99.55100.1 4 T C 99.4 4 F L 9 9 . 6 0 1 0 0 . 0 2 T C 9 9 . 8 1 T C 1 0 1 . 3 6 1 0 0 . 9 1 101.23 1 0 1 . 0 5 1 0 1 . 3 5 100.74101.20101.31101.05 101.28100.78101.08 101.33 101.08100.67101.26101.11 101.73 1 0 1 . 7 9 1 0 1 . 7 4 1 0 2 . 1 0 101.92101.76 1 0 2 . 0 5 1 0 1 . 7 6 101.75101.7 5 102. 0 4 101.09 100.85 102.01102.25 101.83 101.73 1 0 2 . 0 9 100.04100.34100.34 100.45 100.5299.75100.10100.33 100.19100.28 1 0 0 . 3 5 1 0 0 . 3 6 1 0 0 . 1 6 1 0 1 . 2 7 1 0 1 . 0 7 1 0 0 . 9 8 1 0 1 . 2 7 1 0 1 . 2 8 1 0 1 . 1 8 1 0 0 . 0 6 T C 9 9 . 8 8 T C 9 9 . 7 4 F L 9 9 . 9 3 1 0 0 . 5 5 1 0 0 . 5 7 T C 9 9 . 9 3 F L 1 0 0 . 8 5 1 0 0 . 6 0 T C 1 0 0 . 2 5 F L 1 0 0 . 3 9 1 0 0 . 4 8 T C 1 0 0 . 5 5 1 0 1 . 6 7 1 0 1 . 6 5 1 0 1 . 5 1 1 0 1 . 3 4 1 0 1 . 2 9 1 0 1 . 2 0 1 0 1 . 4 3 1 0 1 . 8 4 1 0 2 . 1 9 1 0 1 . 4 6 1 0 1 . 9 4 1 0 2 . 2 1 1 0 1 . 9 8 1 0 1 . 6 7 1 0 2 . 2 6 1 0 2 . 3 2 1 0 0 . 9 0 1 0 2 . 0 3 1 0 1 . 7 0 1 0 1 . 8 1 1 0 1 . 8 6 1 0 2 . 1 0 1 0 2 . 4 4 1 0 1 . 8 8 1 0 0 . 9 0 T C 1 0 1 . 1 4 T C 1 0 0 . 8 3 F L 1 0 0 . 9 7 1 0 1 . 2 1 1 0 1 . 8 0 1 0 2 . 4 7 1 0 2 . 2 1 T C 1 0 1 . 5 4 F L 1 0 2 . 6 7 T C 1 0 1 . 9 6 F L 1 0 2 . 1 6 1 0 3 . 1 1 T C 1 0 2 . 4 3 F L 1 0 3 . 5 1 T C 1 0 2 . 8 4 F L 1 0 3 . 0 1 1 0 3 . 6 4 1 0 3 . 7 2 T C 1 0 3 . 0 8 F L 1 0 4 . 3 5 T C 1 0 3 . 7 3 F L 1 0 4 . 0 6 1 0 5 . 0 5 T C 1 0 4 . 3 7 F L 1 0 5 . 5 0 T C 1 0 2 . 6 0 1 0 1 . 8 4 1 0 3 . 2 5 1 0 2 . 6 7 1 0 3 . 1 8 1 0 5 . 7 9 1 0 5 . 7 7 1 0 3 . 0 0 1 0 2 . 8 4 101.83 1 0 1 . 9 6 1 0 2 . 2 8 1 0 3 . 9 5 1 0 6 . 5 9 1 0 2 . 8 9 1 0 2 . 6 9 1 0 3 . 0 2 1 0 2 . 3 7 1 0 2 . 5 0 1 0 3 . 3 4 1 0 5 . 6 6 1 0 7 . 4 1 1 0 2 . 3 9 1 0 2 . 3 6 1 0 4 . 5 5 1 0 3 . 3 9 1 0 3 . 2 0 1 0 1 . 9 4 F L 1 0 5 . 8 6 F L 1 0 3 . 0 4 1 0 7 . 3 6 1 0 3 . 4 5 100.52TC 1 0 2 . 1 0 F L 1 0 2 . 5 1 100.16 1 0 3 . 1 9 1 0 6 . 5 0 T C 100.71 1 0 3 . 3 8 1 0 2 . 9 9 1 0 2 . 5 7 100.15 1 0 1 . 8 6 1 0 2 . 5 6 1 0 3 . 8 6 1 0 3 . 0 5 1 0 1 . 8 9 1 0 0 . 9 1 1 0 2 . 6 1 1 0 2 . 3 6 F L 1 0 3 . 2 0 102.19 1 0 3 . 4 6 1 0 2 . 0 1 1 0 2 . 4 0 1 0 3 . 3 6 1 0 2 . 4 5 1 0 2 . 5 0 1 0 6 . 7 3 101.23FL 1 0 5 . 0 2 1 0 1 . 9 4 1 0 3 . 6 5 1 0 2 . 8 5 102.12 1 0 2 . 1 8 1 0 2 . 5 1 1 0 2 . 5 9 1 0 2 . 3 6 1 0 2 . 2 2 1 0 3 . 1 9 1 0 2 . 2 8 1 0 2 . 4 3 1 0 3 . 6 6 1 0 2 . 5 8 1 0 7 . 8 0 1 0 2 . 1 9 F L 1 0 2 . 6 1 1 0 3 . 1 7 1 0 2 . 0 6 F L 1 0 1 . 5 1 F L 1 0 1 . 9 8 1 0 2 . 8 7 1 0 7 . 6 6 1 0 2 . 2 7 1 0 2 . 9 7 1 0 3 . 1 7 1 0 2 . 8 4 1 0 3 . 7 5 99.84FL 1 0 2 . 0 6 1 0 8 . 0 0 1 0 7 . 7 6 1 0 3 . 7 3 1 0 2 . 3 6 99.75 99.9699.71FL 1 0 2 . 2 1 1 0 2 . 5 7 101.94 1 0 1 . 4 2 F L 100.60 100.55101.95 1 0 5 . 6 7 100.92 1 0 7 . 4 5 100.29 1 0 3 . 3 6 1 0 6 . 6 4 1 0 2 . 0 1 1 0 4 . 5 1 99.03 1 0 4 . 8 9 F L 1 0 4 . 5 3 1 0 3 . 9 3 1 0 3 . 4 2 1 0 3 . 1 6 1 0 2 . 1 4 1 0 1 . 8 0 1 0 2 . 0 5 1 0 1 . 9 4 1 0 2 . 3 4 1 0 2 . 0 8 1 0 2 . 1 0 1 0 2 . 2 5 1 0 2 . 3 3 1 0 2 . 3 3 1 0 2 . 3 5 1 0 2 . 9 9 1 0 3 . 7 2 1 0 2 . 8 8 1 0 2 . 9 8 1 0 2 . 1 8 1 0 2 . 9 2 1 0 4 . 0 3 1 0 2 . 9 0 1 0 2 . 6 1 1 0 2 . 1 9 1 0 2 . 0 2 1 0 1 . 7 8 1 0 1 . 6 9 101.71101.82 1 0 2 . 6 5 1 0 1 . 9 5 1 0 2 . 1 0 1 0 5 . 5 0 1 0 6 . 0 8 1 0 6 . 4 5 1 0 2 . 4 8 1 0 7 . 1 3 T C 1 0 6 . 4 9 F L 1 0 7 . 3 3 1 0 2 . 5 2 1 0 2 . 5 1 1 0 2 . 4 2 F L 1 0 3 . 6 6 1 0 2 . 7 5 1 0 2 . 7 3 1 0 7 . 5 2 1 0 5 . 3 9 1 0 2 . 6 2 ∆ 1 0 2 . 2 9 F L ∆ 1 0 2 . 6 3 1 0 2 . 3 7 1 0 1 . 8 1 F L 1 0 1 . 6 7 F L 99.80FL D I S P 2 DISP 4 9DISP 6 10 D I S P 1 DISP 3DISP 5111278 56 3 4 1 2 CANOPY EDGE C A N O P Y E D G E CANOPY EDGE CANOPY EDGE SLAB EDGE S L A B E D G E SLAB EDGE SLAB EDGEN— C R O S S S E C T I O N A - A C R O S S S E C T I O N B - B A T T A C H M E N T N O . 5 CITY OF ANAHEIM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CLASS 32 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS CASE NO.: DEVELOPMENT CASE NO. DEV2019-00042 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP2019-06035 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00148 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2020-100 PROJECT APPLICANT: NAME: Shira Zaghi ADDRESS: 6077 W. Pico Boulevard CITY/ST/ZIP: Los Angeles, CA 90035 E-MAIL:shirazaghi@gmail.com PHONE:(818)280-9062 LEAD AGENCY AND STAFF CONTACT: LEAD AGENCY: City of Anaheim STAFF CONTACT: Andy Uk ADDRESS: 200 S.Anaheim Boulevard CITY/ST/ZIP: Anaheim, CA 92805 E-MAIL:AUk@anaheim.net PHONE:(714) 765-5238 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2501-2525 East Ball Road, Anaheim, CA 92806 APN(s): 253-072-14, 253-072-19, 253-072-18 PROJECT LOCATION: See Figure 1: Project Location ATTACHMENT NO. 6 City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Figure 1: Project Location City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTING: The 1.86-acre site is located at the northeast corner of Sunkist Street and Ball Road. The General Plan designates the Project site for General Commercial land use and it is within the General Commercial “C-G” Zone, the implementation zone for the General Commercial land use designation. Surrounding land uses include single- family residential uses to the north, a gas station to the west across Sunkist Street, a 2-story office building and single-family residential uses to the south across Ball Road, and the southbound off- ramp from the 57 Freeway to the east. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is proposing the demolition of an approximate 17,000 square foot commercial center to construct a new 24-hour convenience market with gas sales and an express car wash with ancillary vacuums (Proposed Project). The project includes an associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit off-premises sales of beer and wine, and a tentative parcel map to consolidate three parcels into two lot. The new 2,950 sq. ft., 20-foot high convenience store would be open 24-hours a day and would include the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption, in addition to typical prepackaged food, beverages, sundries, sales counter area, and area for hot food items. The associated 3,100 sq. ft. gas canopy structure would have six (6)-fuel dispenser islands. The proposed 4,381 sq. ft., 20-foot high express carwash building would incorporate two queuing lanes at the rear (north) of the building and 17 vacuum stalls in front (south) of the building. Figure 2 depicts the site plan of the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project would provide 35 parking spaces, including 12 standard stalls, six (6) parking spaces at the fuel dispenser islands, a loading space and 17 vacuum stalls. Figure 2 shows the site plan of the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project is subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN), and a Tentative Parcel Map, as described in the following section. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Figure 2: Site Plan City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption INFORMATION DEMONSTRATING THAT THE PROJECT SATISFIES THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 15332 OF TITLE 14 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS: 1. Is the project consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations? a. General Plan The General Plan designates the Project site for General Commercial land use. General Commercial land uses include a variety of land uses, including those identified in the Neighborhood Center designation, which are uses that serve the surrounding residential neighborhood or cluster of surrounding residential neighborhoods. For those serving the surrounding neighborhood, Neighborhood Center uses could provide uses such as neighborhood serving food markets, drug stores, restaurants, small hardware stores, childcare centers, health clubs, and other retail and professional uses. Neighborhood Center areas that serve a cluster of neighborhoods could incorporate a mix of commercial uses including the uses identified above plus large grocery stores, appliance stores, neighborhood-serving restaurants, bakeries, banks, specialty shops, and some low intensity civic uses. Areas designated, as General Commercial may, but do not necessarily, serve the adjacent neighborhood or surrounding clusters of neighborhoods. In addition to some of the uses described in the commercial centers, they typically include highway- serving uses such as fast food restaurants, auto-oriented uses such as tire stores, service stations, auto parts stores, and other stand-alone retail uses. The Proposed Project, a 24-hour convenience market with gas sales and an express car wash would fall within the uses that the General Plan considers highway serving and/or auto oriented uses. Therefore, the Proposed Project is consistent with the Project site’s General Plan land use designation. Additionally, Section 4(a) Traffic determined that the Proposed Project would be consistent with the City’s General Plan Circulation Element and its policies relating to LOS and traffic congestion. b. Zoning The Project site is within the General Commercial “C-G” Zone, the Zone, which implements the General Plan’s General Commercial land use designation. Pursuant to Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Code), the intent of the "C-G" Zone is to allow a variety of land uses, including some identified for the Neighborhood Center Commercial “C-NC” Zon e. However, areas designated as "C-G" General Commercial do not necessarily serve the adjacent neighborhood or surrounding clusters of neighborhoods. In addition to some of the uses described in the “C-NC” Zone, properties within the “C-G” Zone typically include highway-serving uses such as fast food restaurants, auto-oriented uses such as tire stores and auto parts stores, and stand-alone retail uses. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption The Proposed Project, a 24-hour convenience market with gas sales and an express car wash, is a permitted use within the “C-G” Zone subject, to approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and the supplemental use regulations in Code Section 18.38.070 (Automobile Services Stations) and 18.38.110 (Convenience Stores). The purpose of the CUP is to ensure that the fuel dispensing and convenience market with beer and wine sales are compatible with surrounding uses, and, that there is proper design and function of the service station in relation to on-site vehicular circulation. The proposed design and operation of the project is consistent with all applicable Code requirements, and with the proposed conditions of approval, staff believes it meets the findings required for approval of a conditional use permit. For instance, the design of the fuel dispenser islands, canopy, and underground storage tanks minimizes the probability of vehicles, including delivery trucks, queueing onto the adjacent streets. In addition, the Proposed Project requires a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, pursuant to Code Section 18.60.220 (Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity) and Section 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code, due to the overconcentration of off-sale licenses within the census tract. There are currently three licenses in the census tract, based on the population size within the census tract, State law requires that any licenses in excess of two licenses requires a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity. The Anaheim Police Department indicates that this property is located within Police Reporting District No. 1829, which has a crime rate that is below the city average. The Anaheim Police Department also analyzes public convenience or necessity requests based on crime statistics within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject site, which has a crime rate that is 30% above the city average. The Applicant has submitted a statement of justification for a determination, which ensures compliance with Alcohol Beverage and Control laws and regulations. Therefore, staff will be recommending approval of the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity. The project includes a Tentative Parcel Map for the consolidation of three existing lots into two lots for the new uses. The new lots will comply with minimum lot size and frontage requirements specified for C-G zones and will have access from public streets. With the approval of the above referenced conditional use permit, determination of public convenience or necessity, and tentative parcel map, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. 2. Is the proposed development located within the City limits on a Project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses? The Project site is 1.86-acres in size, located within the General Commercial “C-G” Zone and surrounded by urban uses. Surrounding land uses include a single-family residential uses to the north, a gas station to the west across Sunkist Street, a 2-story office building and single-family residential uses to the south across Ball Road, and the southbound off- ramp from the 57 Freeway to the east. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption 3. Does the Project site have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species? The existing use at the Project site is an approximate 17,000 square foot commercial center. There is no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species at the Project site. It does not contain suitable habitat for any candidate, sensitive, or special status plant or wildlife species. The Project site does contain existing landscaping that migratory birds could potentially use for breeding and nesting. The Project site contains existing landscaping and site trees that migratory birds could potentially use for breeding and nesting, however the removal of the site trees would follow regulations set forth by the Migratory Birds Treaty Act. 4. Would approval of the project result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality? a. Traffic: This section utilizes the following technical studies in its analysis: • Trip Generation Assessment for the Ball and Sunkist Gas Station and Car Wash, Fehr & Peers, July 31, 2019 (Appendix B) • Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis, Ganddini, August 26, 2020 (Appendix C) The California Natural Resources Agency adopted revised California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines on December 28, 2018. Among the changes to the guidelines was the removal of vehicle delay and Level of Service (LOS) from consideration for transportation impacts under CEQA. The adopted guidelines, evaluates transportation impacts based on a project’s effect on vehicle miles traveled (VMT). These guidelines allowed lead agencies to continue using their current impact criteria until June 30, 2020, or to opt into the revised transportation guidelines. In late 2019, State courts stated that under section 21099, subdivision (b)(2), existing law is that “automobile delay, as described solely by level of service or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment” under CEQA, except for roadway capacity projects. While no longer pertinent under analyzing traffic impacts under CEQA, the Proposed Project does not create a significant impact through LOS or delay as it relates to the City’s General Plan elements. On June 23, 2020, the City of Anaheim City Council adopted the VMT Thresholds of Significance for purpose of analyzing transportation impacts and approved the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines for CEQA Analysis. Based on the City Guidelines, the Proposed Project qualifies under one of the screening thresholds types for determining if a VMT analysis is required. VMT ASSESSMENT AND SCREENING As noted previously, on June 23, 2020, the City adopted the VMT Thresholds of Significance and approved TIA Guidelines, for purposes of analyzing transportation impacts. Per the City’s TIA Guidelines, certain projects that meet specific screening criteria would have a less than significant impact with respect to CEQA Section 15064.3. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Lead agencies can use three project-screening types for project-level assessments. A project only needs to fulfill one of the screening types below to qualify for screening. Type 1: Transit Priority Area Screening. A Transit Priority Area is a half-mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor. Projects located within a Transit Priority Area would have a less than significant VMT impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project has a total floor area ratio of less than 0.75, includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction, is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy, or replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units. Type 2: Low VMT Area Screening. A low VMT-generating area is an area that has a VMT per service population metric that is 15% below the County average. Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area would have a less than significant impact that is absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Other employment- related and mixed-use projects within a low VMT-generating area may also be presumed to have a less than significant impact if the project can reasonably be expected to generate a VMT per service population metric similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area. Type 3: Project Type Screening. Some project types are presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature. Such projects that have a less than significant impact due to their local serving nature include local-serving K-12 schools, neighborhood and community parks, day care centers, certain local-serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet. Additionally, student housing projects on or adjacent to college campuses, community and religious assembly uses, public services, local-serving community colleges, affordable or supportive housing, convalescent and rest homes, senior housing, and projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips. Projects not screened through the steps above shall complete a VMT analysis and forecasting to determine if they would result in a significant VMT impact. Below are VMT thresholds to determine potential VMT impacts: • A project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if the baseline project-generated or cumulative project-generated VMT per service population exceeds 15% below the County of Orange baseline VMT per service population. • The project’s effect on VMT is significant if the baseline or cumulative link-level boundary Citywide VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of access to services by local residents and has the effect of reducing vehicle miles traveled. Specifically, in the City’s guidelines, the following uses would have a less than significant impact due to their local serving nature: • Local serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet, including: o Automobile Washing o Automotive- Service Stations o Convenience Stores The Proposed Project is a local serving Type 3 project. In addition, there is the propensity for patrons to use more than one of these facilities on the same trip, also referred to as internal capture. Therefore, the Proposed Project would be screened from a VMT analysis, and would be considered a less than significant impact on VMT, per the City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis General Plan and Traffic Impact Study Criteria Significance Thresholds The City’s General Plan Circulation Element contains policies relating to LOS and traffic congestion. While the revised CEQA Guidelines prohibit a Lead Agency from using vehicle delay and LOS to evaluate a Proposed Project’s transportation impact under CEQA, the following analysis provides the Proposed Project’s consistency with these policies, as well as the City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies for informational purposes. The City’s Traffic Study Guidelines state that a traffic study is required for a project that meets the following criteria: a) When the AM or PM peak-hour trip generation exceeds 100 vehicle trips from the proposed development. b) Projects on the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Highway System which generate 1,600 Average Daily Trips (ADT) or adjacent to CMP Highway System which generate 2,400 ADT c) Projects that will add 51 or more trips during either AM or PM peak hours to any monitored CMP intersection. d) Any project that proposes variations from the City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. According to the Trip Generation Assessment for the Ball and Sunkist Gas Station and Car Wash memorandum produced by Fehr & Peers on July 31, 2019 (Appendix B), determined that the Proposed Project would produce 108 trips (53 inbound/55 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 96 trips (50 inbound/46 outbound) during the PM peak hour. Therefore, a traffic impact analysis (TIA) was required pursuant to criteria (a), for the Proposed Project. The TIA; Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis, was prepared by Ganddini. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption The City of Anaheim’s General Plan Circulation Element has the following policies relating to LOS and traffic congestion: • Goal 2.1: Maintain efficient traffic operations on City streets and maintain a peak hour level of service not worse than D at street intersections. As shown below on Table 1, the City’s signalized study intersections and significance thresholds for project traffic impacts: TABLE 1 – LOS Significance Thresholds Level of Service Final V/C Ratio Project-Related Increase in V/C C > 0.700 - 0.800 equal to or greater than 0.050 D > 0.800 - 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.030 E,F > 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.010 The City does not have established significant impact thresholds for un-signalized intersections. As such, the TIA uses the Caltrans thresholds of significance for un- signalized intersections. A project traffic impact at an un-signalized intersection is significant if the addition of project-generated trips increases the delay by 10 seconds or more and/or causes Level of Service E or F. Existing Operations: As shown below on Table 2, the study intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Services (D or better) during peak hours for existing conditions. TABLE 2 – Existing Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection Jurisdiction Traffic Control1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C2 or [Delay]3 LOS V/C or [Delay] LOS 2. Sunkist at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.654 B 0.705 C 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.650 [15.5] B 0.721 [16.6] C HCM4 B C 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.605 [12.9] B 0.710 [14.0] C HCM B B 1TS=Traffic Signal 2V/C = Volume Capacity 3Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. 4HCM = Highway Capacity Manual City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Existing Plus Project: As shown below on Table 3, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour (see Table 4): • Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS E) • Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although a forecasted operation at Level of Service E occurs at some of these intersections during the PM peak hour, there is no recommended additional improvements needed for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop-controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the Project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience a delay. These southbound right-turning vehicles can queue within the Project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right-turning vehicles during the PM peak hour is 47.37 feet for the project west driveway and 23.17 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. As shown below on Table 4, based on the established thresholds of significance, the Proposed Project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions. TABLE 3 – Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection Jurisdiction Traffic Control AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or [Delay] LOS V/C or [Delay] LOS 1. Sunkist St at Project Dwy Anaheim CSS [10.2] B [15.0] B 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.666 B 0.723 C 3. Project West Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [20.6] C [45.7] E 4. Project East Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [19.5] C [36.9] E 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.656 [15.6] B 0.730 [16.9] C HCM B C 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.611 [12.9] B 0.725 [14.3] C HCM B B City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Existing Plus Cumulative: As shown below on Table 5, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Cumulative conditions. Opening Year Without Project: As shown below on Table 6, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year Without Project conditions. TABLE 4 – Existing Plus Project Significant Impact Evaluation Signalized Intersections Study Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Without Project With Project Change Significant Impact? Without Project With Project Change Significant Impact? V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS 2. Sunkist at Ball Rd 0.654 B 0.666 B +0.012 No 0.705 C 0.723 C +0.018 No 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd. 0.650 B 0.656 B +0.006. No 0.721 C 0.730 C +0.009 No 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd. 0.605 B .0611 B +0.006 No 0.710 C 0.725 C +0.015 No TABLE 5 – Existing Plus Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection Jurisdiction Traffic Control AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or [Delay] LOS V/C or [Delay] LOS 2. Sunkist at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.654 B 0.705 C 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.650 [15.5] B 0.721 [16.6] C HCM B B 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.605 [12.9] B 0.711 [14.0] C HCM B B City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Opening Year With Project: As shown below on Table 7, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year With Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour. • Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS F) • Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although a forecasted operation at LOS E/F occurs at some of these intersections during the PM peak hour, there is no additional improvements needed for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop-controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the Project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience any delay. These southbound right-turning vehicles can queue within the Project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right-turning vehicles during the PM peak TABLE 6 – Opening Year Without Project Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection Jurisdiction Traffic Control AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or [Delay] LOS V/C or [Delay] LOS 2. Sunkist at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.678 B 0.731 C 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.674 [16.0] B 0.748 [17.5] C HCM B B 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.605 [13.4] B 0.737 [15.0] C HCM B B TABLE 7 – Opening Year with Project Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection Jurisdiction Traffic Control AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour V/C or [Delay] LOS V/C or [Delay] LOS 1. Sunkist St at Project Dwy Anaheim CSS [10.3] B [15.4] C 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.690 B 0.749 C 3. Project West Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [21.6] C [51.2] F 4. Project East Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [20.3] C [40.3] E 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.680 [16.1] B 0.757 [17.8] C HCM B B 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd. Caltrans TS 0.634 [13.4] B 0.752 [15.8] C HCM B B City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption hour is 52.25 feet for the project west driveway and 25.34 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. As shown below on Table 8, the Proposed Project would result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for Opening Year with Project conditions. As presented, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the City’s General Plan’s Circulation Element’s goals and policies. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in significant traffic impacts and no mitigation measures are necessary. b. Noise: This section utilizes the following technical studies in its analysis: • East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study, Veneklasen Associates, Inc., November 25, 2020 (Appendix D.1 and Appendix D.2) Construction - The following construction-related noise analysis conservatively anticipates construction to last approximately five months and divides the construction period into various phases: site preparation, grading, and building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The Proposed Project would generate noise temporarily during these construction activities. Equipment used during construction, including site preparation and building construction would create noise impacts during the construction process. However, these construction noise impacts would be temporary and cease upon completion of construction. Construction activities occurring as part of the Proposed Project would be subject to the limitations and requirements of AMC Section 6.70.010 (Sound Pressure Levels). This section limits noise generated from construction or building repair of any premise within the City during the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Additional work hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works or a Building Official. In addition, construction equipment, fixed or mobile, would be equipped with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers consistent with TABLE 8 – Opening Year with Project Significant Impact Evaluation Signalized Intersections Study Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Without Project With Project Change Significant Impact? Without Project With Project Change Significant Impact? V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS 2. Sunkist at Ball Rd 0.678 B 0.690 B +0.012 No 0.731 C 0.749 C +0.018 No 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd. 0.674 B 0.680 B +0.006. No 0.748 C 0.757 C +0.009 No 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd. 0.628 B .0634 B +0.006 No 0.737 C 0.752 C +0.015 No City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption manufacturer’s standards. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not have any significant noise impacts during construction. Operation – Because the Proposed Project is adjacent to residences immediately north of the Project site, an acoustical study was prepared; East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study. This study was conducted by Veneklasen Associates, Inc. (Veneklasen) The study includes an assessment of the existing and future sound levels as caused by traffic, car wash activity, and any mechanical equipment for the convenience store compared to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. Veneklasen prepared the Noise Study based on two interpretations of the Anaheim Municipal Code; 1) Where existing noise levels, if matches or exceeds the dBA limit, then a new maximum allowable exterior standard would become 5 dBA above the existing ambient noise level or; 2) Where only noise generated by the future project itself is taken into account and must comply with the 60 dBa requirement established in the Anaheim Municipal Code. EXISTING TRAFFIC AND EQUIPMENT SOUND MEASUREMENTS Veneklasen took sound measurements at the Project site to capture existing ambient noise levels on July 15, 2019. As shown below on Table 9, the existing ambient noise measurements. These acoustical measurements were conducted with Brüel & Kjær Type 2270 sound level meters, which conform to ANSI S.14-1961 for Type 1 precision sound level meters and were conducted using Brüel & Kjær Type 4189 microphones. TABLE 9 – Existing Ambient Noise Measurements Location Time Daytime Hour Leq (dBA) S1 1:00 PM 70 S2 68 The noise study Veneklasen does not anticipate a significant variation in the overall level during the evening hours due to the project site’s proximity to Highway 57 and the significant traffic volume along Ball Road. Based on previous measurements completed by Veneklasen, statistical analysis, and traffic patterns, the noise levels would be similar throughout daytime and evening hours. This is primarily due to an increase in free-flowing traffic along Highway 57 during the evening hours, which results in higher noise levels as caused by tire noise. In addition, Veneklasen utilized sound measurements conducted for a previous project at an existing Rapid Express Car Wash. This car wash is located at 2045 North Tustin Street in Orange, California, and the associated sound measurements took place on July 30, 2019. The noise specialist took noise measurements from the blowers, water sprayers, rotating brushes and central vacuum. The noise specialist measured sound levels for each source City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption independently to determine the levels of each piece of equipment to calibrate the computer model. The noise specialist used an NTi XL2 sound level meter to conduct all of the acoustical measurements of the equipment were conducted with, which conforms to ANSI S.14-1961 for Type 1 precision sound level meters. All measurement equipment was field- calibrated before use. As shown below on Table 10, a summary of measured noise levels from the car wash mechanical equipment. TABLE 10 – Car Wash Equipment Noise Measurement Results Equipment Distance, ft Leq (dBA) Blowers 5 101 Water Sprayers 5 85 Rotating Brushes 5 89 Central Vacuum 3 80 NOISE MODELING, ANALYSIS, AND RESULTS From the measurement data and provided specifications, Veneklasen has utilized the Brüel & Kjær Predictor computer software program in order to predict sound levels at various locations around the Project site. Sound exposure due to the proposed building geometry for the car wash and convenience store was modeled based on drawings provided by the Applicant. There is an existing 6-foot wall at the property line, between the Project site and sensitive receptors to the north. In order to improve a shielding effect from noise, the Applicant informed Veneklasen that a new 8-foot wall is proposed. The planned 8-foot wall at the property line, vacuum canopies, the car wash tunnel itself, along with a new 9- foot tall by 25-foot long wall at the car wash tunnel exit were included in the computer model. Inputs for modeling the car wash equipment includes the measured sound level data summarized above in Table 10. Veneklasen also used published sound power data for the two Carrier 48HC-D08 rooftop units scheduled on the roof of the convenience store. Veneklasen utilized Carrier’s published datasheets provided sound power data for this equipment. Noise Analysis with Anaheim Municipal Code Interpretation #1 Existing Noise Levels without Project As shown below in Figure 3, the existing noise levels around the Project site are due to traffic noise only, primarily caused by traffic flow along Ball Road and Highway 57. The first number at each receiver indicates the noise level at 1st floor, while the second number indicates the noise level at the 2nd floor. Since the 2nd floor of sensitive receptors to the north have direct line of sight to the roadway over the barrier, the noise levels as shown are slightly higher than the 1st floor levels. The noise specialist calibrated the sound measurements model to both the completed on- site and the traffic counts for Ball Road. The first number in the rectangle indicates noise City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption level at first floor, and second number the noise level at the second floor. Since the second floor of sensitive receptors to the north have direct line of sight to the roadway over the barrier, the noise levels as shown are slightly higher than the first floor levels. The levels shown represent the highest levels modeled along the property line closest to the convenience store and car wash equipment sources. All modeled levels at sensitive receptors are equal to or lower than the values shown below in Figure 3. Table 11 shown below presents the summarized noise levels. TABLE 11 – Comparison of Modeled Noise Levels with Municipal Code Limits Interpretation #1 Receiver Floor Modeled Existing Level (Traffic Only), dBA Modeled Future Level (Traffic Only + Equipment), dBA Municipal Code Noise Level Criterion, dBA Municipal Code Compliance R1 1st 58 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 63 ≤ 65 Yes R2 1st 57 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 63 ≤ 65 Yes R3 1st 57 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 63 ≤ 65 Yes R4 1st 57 58 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 62 ≤ 65 Yes R5 1st 58 58 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 62 61 ≤ 67 Yes R6 1st 58 58 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 63 62 ≤ 68 Yes R7 1st 59 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 64 64 ≤ 69 Yes R8 1st 60 60 ≤ 65 Yes 2nd 66 66 ≤ 71 Yes City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Figure 3 – Predicted Existing Noise Levels, Traffic Only As can be seen by the results of the model without the project, the existing ambient sound levels as caused by traffic only from Ball Road are 57 to 60 dBA at the first floor and 60 to 66 dBA at the second floor. Pertinent to the Anaheim Municipal Code, this would establish the maximum allowable level as caused by the convenience store and car wash operations to be between 60 to 65 dBA at the first floor and between 65 to 71 dBA at the second floor. Future Noise Levels with the Project Figure 4 depicts the predicted sound levels caused by the proposed convenience store and car wash with planned equipment (vacuums, washers, blowers, rooftop equipment) during operations. Veneklasen’s modeling assumes an 8-foot barrier along the back property line, a 9-foot tall by 25-foot long barrier, at the exit of the car wash tunnel near the blowers and a 5-foot barrier to shield future RTUs at the roof of the convenience store. A summary of the sound levels is also included in Table 11 above. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Figure 4 – Predicted Noise Levels, Traffic Only and Equipment City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption As shown above in Figure 4, and as presented above in Table 11, the car wash and convenience store operation at all receivers for both the 1st and 2nd floors meets minimum established existing ambient noise levels, as shown in Table 9. CONCLUSION OF INTERPRETATION #1 Existing traffic noise along Ball Road is the primary noise source at the property line to the north, and modeled levels are compliant with the City’s requirements. This establishes that the predicted levels as caused equipment from the convenience store and car wash alone (i.e. without traffic contribution from Ball Road) would be less than or equal to 59 dBA at both the first and second floors of the property line to the north. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Noise Analysis with Anaheim Municipal Code Interpretation #2 Figure 5 shows the predicted sound levels, as caused by the proposed convenience store and car wash with planned equipment (vacuums, washers, blowers, rooftop equipment) operational. For this interpretation, traffic noise has been excluded from the modeling since the project would need to comply with the City’s 60 dBA requirement without the influence of existing noise sources already present at the site. The first number at each receiver indicates the noise level at 1st floor, while the second number indicates the noise level at the 2nd floor. Since the 2nd floor of sensitive receptors to the north have direct line of sight over the barrier, the noise levels as shown are slightly higher than the 1st floor levels. The levels shown are representative of the property line closest to the convenience store and car wash equipment sources. All modeled levels at sensitive receptors are equal to or lower than the values shown in Figure 5 and summarized below, in Table 12. Within the design, Veneklasen has assumed an 8-foot tall barrier along the back property line; a 9-foot tall, 25-foot long barrier at the exit of the car wash tunnel near the blowers; a 5-foot barrier to shield from future RTUs at the roof of the convenience store; and, cars idling at the car wash queue as shown in Figure 5. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption . TABLE 12 – Comparison of Modeled Noise Levels with Municipal Code Limits Interpretation #2 Receiver Floor Modeled Future Level (Traffic Only + Equipment), dBA Municipal Code Noise Level Criterion, dBA Municipal Code Compliance R1 1st 52 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 56 ≤ 60 Yes R2 1st 54 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 58 ≤ 60 Yes R3 1st 53 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 59 ≤ 60 Yes R4 1st 52 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 57 ≤ 60 Yes R5 1st 51 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 55 ≤ 60 Yes R6 1st 49 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 55 ≤ 60 Yes R7 1st 46 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 53 ≤ 60 Yes R8 1st 49 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 56 ≤ 60 Yes Figure 5 – Predicted Noise Levels with Equipment City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption CONCLUSION OF INTERPRETATION #2 Noise generated because of the proposed project towards all receivers’ 1st and 2nd floors meet the minimum Anaheim Municipal Code requirements of 60 dBA. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c. Air Quality: This section utilizes the following technical studies in its analysis: • CalEEMod Analysis, City of Anaheim, July10, 2020 (Appendix A) The Proposed Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin, which is a Federal- and State-designated nonattainment area for ozone and particulates. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has established significance thresholds for both construction and operational activities relative to these criteria pollutants. Based on the following analysis, implementation of the project would result in less than significant impacts relative to the daily significance thresholds for criteria air pollutant emissions established by the SCAQMD. Construction - The following construction-related air quality analysis conservatively anticipates construction to last approximately seven months. Construction would occur in year 2020 through year 2021. The construction of the Proposed Project has various phases: site preparation, grading, and building construction, paving, and architectural coating. General construction activities, such as site preparation, grading and commuting to the Project site by construction workers and delivery of construction equipment and building materials would contribute to the emission of air pollutants. All construction activities would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding the control of fugitive dust emissions, and existing City dust suppression practices that minimize dust and other emissions. Such controls include: • Frequent watering of the Project site; • Covering and/or wetting trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose materials off- site; • Street sweeping, as needed, to remove dirt dropped by construction vehicles or mud that would otherwise be carried off by trucks departing the Project site; • Suspending grading and excavation activities in high winds (25 miles per hour [mph] or more); as well as, • Implementation of a traffic control plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities, etc., that would be incorporated into the construction plans. The CalEEMod 2016.3.2 computer model calculated the construction activities required to develop the project would generate pollutant emissions. This analysis considers conservative assumptions, which imply a default equipment mix and a worst-case construction schedule. As shown in Table 13, the model calculates project construction emissions to be below SCAQMD significance thresholds for regional emissions. Based on the above analysis, construction of the Proposed Project would result in less than City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption significant impacts relative to the daily significance thresholds for criteria air pollutant construction emissions established by the SCAQMD. TABLE 13 - REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Construction Activity pounds per day (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Demolition (2020) 2.3 22.3 15.0 >0.1 2.3 1.3 Site Preparation (2020) 1.0 10.0 7.0 >0.1 0.9 0.5 Grading (2020) 1.0 9.8 8.7 >0.1 1.0 0.7 Building Construction (2020) 0.9 9.0 7.6 >0.1 0.6 0.5 Building Construction (2021) 0.8 8.1 7.4 >0.1 0.5 0.4 Paving (2021) 0.8 6.7 7.6 >0.1 0.5 0.4 Architectural Coating (2021) 5.3 1.5 1.8 >0.1 0.1 >0.1 Maximum Emission 5.3 22.3 15.0 >0.1 2.3 1.3 Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No CalEEMod emissions for fugitive dust were adjusted to account for a 61 percent control efficiency associated with SCAQMD Rule 403. Operation – Calculations for mobile source emissions attributed to the Proposed Project utilized the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rate that CalEEMod 2016.3.2 calculates based on the proposed land uses and intensity. The analysis determines the daily VMT rate based on the number of daily trips for each land use and applies a commute percentage and an average trip length, both of which are land use specific values derived from CalEEMod 2016.3.2. These values account for variations in trip frequency and length associated with commuting to and from the Proposed Project. The TIA memorandum (Appendix C) for the Proposed Project provides estimated daily trips associated with the Proposed Project. This analysis calculates the daily VMT rate using the number of daily trips for the respective land use with pass-by reduction (1,888 trips/day). The analysis takes the daily trip value and applies an average trip length derived from CalEEMod 2016.3.2 for the Anaheim region. The analysis projects emission factors specific to the operational year of 2021 based on specific fleet turnover rates and the impact of future emission standards and fuel efficiency standards. The increase in the consumption of fossil fuels to provide power, heat, and ventilation are part of the calculations as stationary point source emissions. The emission factors used in this analysis represent a statewide average of known power producing facilities, utilizing various technologies and emission control strategies. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 calculates area source emissions and includes emissions from natural gas and landscape fuel combustion, consumer products, and architectural coatings (future maintenance). Table 14 shows the Proposed Project’s daily operational emissions included within the CalEEMod 2016.3.2 model and as shown, the operational emissions of Proposed Project would not exceed any SCAQMD emission thresholds; and therefore, would not have any significant air quality impacts during operation. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption TABLE 14 - DAILY OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Operational Emissions Source pounds per day (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources 0.2 >0.1 >0.1 0.0 >0.1 >0.1 Energy Sources >0.1 >0.1 >0.1 >0.1 >0.1 >0.1 Mobile Sources 2.3 10.0 19.0 >0.1 4.1 1.1 Maximum Emission 2.3 10.0 19.0 >0.1 4.1 1.1 Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No CalEEMod emissions modeling files can be found in Appendix A d. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Analysis In September 2010, the SCAQMD CEQA Significance Thresholds GHG Working Group released a recommended threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e for all land use projects. This analysis uses the 3,000 MT/year recommendation as a guideline for the GHG analysis for the project. The Proposed Project would generate GHG emissions from construction equipment, vehicular operation, and utilities usage. The CalEEMod 2016.3.2 computer model calculates annual CO2e emissions that the Proposed Project would produce during construction and operations. Table 15 shows the Proposed Project’s estimated annual emissions of GHGs. The SCAQMD policy for the analysis of GHG construction emissions is to amortize the emissions over a 30-year lifetime. Construction of the Proposed Project would produce approximately 57 MTCO2e, or approximately 2.0 MTCO2e annually over a 30-year period. The total annual operating emissions would be approximately 1,000 MTCO2e per year after accounting for amortized construction emissions. Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Project would result in a less-than-significant impact related to GHG emissions. TABLE 15 - ESTIMATED ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Scenario and Source Annual GHG Emissions (MTCO2e per Year) Construction Emissions Amortized (Direct)/a/ 2 Area Source Emissions (Direct) <1 Energy Source Emissions (Indirect) 59 Mobile Source Emissions 921 Waste Disposal Emissions (Indirect) 19 Water Distribution Emissions (Indirect) 10 Total Emissions(with pass-by reduction) 1,011 Significance Threshold 3,000 Exceed Threshold? No /a/ Based on SCAQMD guidance, emissions summary including 30-year amortization with construction. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption e. Water Quality This section utilizes the following technical studies in its analysis: • Preliminary Hydrologic Report, The Altum Group on September 27, 2019. (Appendix E) • Conceptual County of Orange/Santa Ana Region City of Anaheim Priority Project Water Management Plan, The Altum Group on September 27, 2019. (Appendix F) Grading and construction associated with site work on the Project site would result in temporary disturbance of surface soils, which could potentially result in erosion and sedimentation on Project site, which are major visible water quality impacts attributable to construction activities. Any stockpiles of excavated areas would be susceptible to high rates of erosion from wind and rain and, if not managed properly, could result in increased sedimentation in local drainage ways. The City would require the project to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) MS4 Permit. The NPDES MS4 Permit Program, administered by the City of Anaheim and County of Orange and issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), helps control water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into receiving waters. The project operation must also comply with the NPDES General Construction Permit. The project contractor would be required to comply with Chapter 10.09 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, which prohibits the active or passive discharge or disposal of soil or construction debris into the storm drain. Additionally, the project would be required to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ). Construction activities subject to the Construction General Permit includes clearing, grading, and disturbances to ground such as stockpiling or excavation. The Construction General Permit requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would generally contain a site map showing the construction perimeter, existing and proposed buildings, storm water collection and discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the Project site, and adjacent roadways. The SWPPP must also include project construction features designed to protect against stormwater runoff, known as Best Management Practices (BMPs). Additionally, the SWPPP must contain a visual monitoring program; a chemical monitoring program for “non-visible” pollutants, should the BMPs fail; and a sediment-monitoring plan, should the Project site discharge directly into a water body listed on the 303(d) list for sediment. Section A of the Construction General Permit describes the elements that must be contained in the SWPPP. Incorporation of these policies and ordinances and the requirements contained within would reduce water quality impacts to less than significant. The Applicant has submitted a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) dated September City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption 27, 2019. The City of Anaheim Public Works Department approved the Preliminary WQMP on June 15, 2020. Appendix F contains the approved preliminary WQMP. Once the Applicant receives approval of the Proposed Project, the Applicant will submit a Final WQMP at a future date. Project compliance with existing Codes and Regulations would result in less than significant impacts to water quality. 5. Can the Project site be adequately served by all required utilities and public services? a. Fire Protection: The Proposed Project would incrementally increase demands for fire protection services associated with service calls, inspections, etc. However, the increased demand for fire protection services would be minimal and met with existing fire resources. Additionally, the Proposed Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities. The City provides for additional fire personnel and associated facilities and through its annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program review process. Annually, Fire Department needs would be assessed and budget allocations revised accordingly to ensure that adequate levels of service are maintained throughout the City. The Proposed Project would contribute to the funding of fire services over an extended period, through an increase in tax revenue relative to the Project site’s increase in development intensity. Additionally, building plans submitted for new development on the Project site would be required to comply with fire safety requirements. The Proposed Project impacts to fire services would be less than significant. b. Police Protection: The Proposed Project would incrementally increase demands for police protection services associated with service calls for burglaries, theft, etc. However, the increased demand for police protection services would be minimal and would not result in the need for new or physically altered police protection facilities. Impacts to police services would be less than significant. c. Schools: The Proposed Project is a service station with a convenience store. The Proposed Project would not generate any new students that may require the attendance of the existing schools. Therefore, there would be no impacts to schools. d. Parks: The Proposed Project is a service station with a convenience store. The Proposed Project would not generate new residents that may need recreational and/or leisure use of the existing parks. Therefore, there would be no impacts to parks. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption f. Other Public Facilities: The Proposed Project is a service station with a convenience store. The Proposed Project would not generate new residents that may utilize library facilities in the City. Therefore, there would be no other public facilities impacts. g. Wastewater/Sewer: The Anaheim Public Works Department would serve the Proposed Project for wastewater (sanitary sewer) collection service. The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) treats the wastewater collected within City. The Proposed Project’s sewer conveyance will utilize the same sewer lateral that services the existing development, which ultimately drains to the existing 10” mainline in Ball Road. The City’s sewer masterplan does not identify the existing wastewater facilities as deficient in either “Existing” or “Build-out” conditions. Due to the size of the project, no significant impacts to the existing wastewater infrastructure would occur and the existing wastewater collection facilities have adequate capacity to serve the wastewater generated by the project; and therefore, the impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, due to the amount of wastewater that the project would generate, the impacts to the OCSD treatment facilities would be less than significant. h. Storm Water Drainage: This section utilizes the following technical studies in its analysis: • Preliminary Hydrologic Report, The Altum Group on September 27, 2019. (Appendix E) The hydrology report found that under the existing condition, storm runoff surface flows across the site from the northeast toward the southwest and directly off-site onto East Ball Road. Under the proposed condition, storm runoff will continue to surface flow. However, site grading will be such that the northerly half of the site will tend to direct flows toward the northwesterly side of the property while the southerly half of the site will surface drain in a southwesterly direction. The Proposed Project will develop the Project Site to direct all on-site surface runoff toward planter areas that will serve as shallow basin infiltration BMPs. The Proposed Project will size infiltration BMPs to store the Design Capture Volume (DCV) defined as the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event as required City of Anaheim WQMP requirements where feasible. When storm runoff volumes exceed the DCV, stored runoff will overflow the infiltration basins, leaving the site onto East Ball Road and into a public underground storm drain. Once the project runoff exits the site and enters the public storm drain system, the system will convey the runoff toward the west and into an Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) Facility (E12P01, per Orange County Drainage Facility Base Map, Sheet 14). Underground storm drain facility E12P01 carries flows in a southerly direction, along State College Boulevard, connecting to an OCFCD underground channel (E12) which flows in a southerly direction and empties into the Santa Ana River. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption On-site grading and drainage improvements proposed in conjunction with the Project site work would be required to meet the City’s and OCFCD’s flood control criteria including design discharges, design/construction standards and maintenance features. All new development projects in the City are required to include specific design BMPs to ensure that no storm water runoff generated on site would leave the site without pre-treatment for urban pollutants. The Proposed Project would not alter any drainage pattern in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite. There are no streams or rivers on the site; and, therefore the project would not alter any streams or rivers on the Project site. Erosion and siltation impacts potentially resulting from the Proposed Project would primarily occur during the project’s site preparation and grading phase. Implementation of the NPDES permit requirements, as they apply to the site, would reduce potential erosion, siltation, and water quality impacts. The Proposed Project would have less than significant storm drain impacts. h. Water Supplies: The City of Anaheim receives water from two main sources: the Orange County Groundwater Basin, managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD), and imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). The City pumps groundwater from 18 active wells located within the City, and MWD delivers imported water to the City through seven treated water connections and one untreated connection. According to the City of Anaheim 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), local groundwater has been the least expensive and most reliable source of water supply for the City. The City depends heavily on groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin each year. Based on a baseline demand projection under the 2015 UWMP, the supply of local water that would be required to serve the Proposed Project is adequate. The baseline scenario assumes the implementation of future passive measures affecting new developments, including the Model Water Efficient Landscape, plumbing code efficiencies for toilets, and expected plumbing code for high-efficiency clothes washers. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in a significant deficit in the volume of the local aquifer volume or lower the local groundwater. The project would have less than significant impacts to groundwater supplies. i. Solid Waste Disposal: Assembly Bill 939 requires local jurisdictions to divert at least 50 percent of their solid waste to recycling. As of 2018, the City is diverting approximately 60 percent of its solid waste to recycling. The City is currently diverting waste to the Olinda Alpha Landfill in the City of Brea, which permits the acceptance of approximately 8,000 tons of waste per day. In April 2016, Assembly Bill 1826 requires businesses in California to recycle their organic waste based on the amount generated per week. The Proposed Project’s contribution of solid waste would be minimal and would not significantly affect current landfill operations. The Proposed Project would not have any significant solid waste impacts. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption j. Electricity: k. Natural Gas: l. Telephone Service: m. Television Service: The Project site is located in a built-out, urban setting. Various utility service providers serve the site and the surrounding properties. There are no anticipated significant service or system upgrades required to serve the Proposed Project. Any increase in the demand for public utilities by the Proposed Project would be less than significant. DETERMINATION: I find that the answers given above are adequately supported by the information sources cited following each question and that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 32 – Infill Development Projects) characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions of Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act. Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Date Andy Uk (714) 765-5238 Printed Name, Title Phone Number City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Appendix A – CalEEMod Analysis 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 38.00 Space 0.00 0.00 0 Automobile Care Center 4.85 1000sqft 1.86 4,850.00 0 Convenience Market (24 Hour)6.05 1000sqft 0.00 6,050.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2021Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1047.47 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 2501-2525 East Ball Road South Coast Air Basin, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 1 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Project Characteristics - APU Emission Factor - CO2 Intensity Factor Land Use - Convenenience Market 24 hr = 2,950 sq. ft. convenience store and 3,100 sq. ft. canopy structure. Automobile Care Center = 4,850 sq. ft. Car Wash. Construction Phase - Construction Schedule Provided by Applicant. Demolition - Demoliton assumption provided by Applicant. Grading - Import/Export Soil provided by Applicant. Off-road Equipment - Trips and VMT - Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rates from Traffic Study. Fleet Mix - Consumer Products - Road Dust - Area Coating - Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD RULE #403 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 15.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 20.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 70.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 15.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 664.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 223.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 15,200.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 2 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.34 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.11 1.86 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.14 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 125.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 4.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 4.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 1047.47 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 135.28 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 863.10 203.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 135.28 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 758.45 203.65 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 135.28 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 737.99 203.65 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 3 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 2.2532 23.1630 15.6142 0.0314 1.9532 1.1606 3.1138 0.4640 1.0839 1.4127 0.0000 3,099.353 1 3,099.353 1 0.6486 0.0000 3,115.5683 2021 5.2757 8.1326 7.6039 0.0130 0.2012 0.4461 0.5519 0.0534 0.4104 0.4230 0.0000 1,206.895 2 1,206.895 2 0.3593 0.0000 1,214.436 3 Maximum 5.2757 23.1630 15.6142 0.0314 1.9532 1.1606 3.1138 0.4640 1.0839 1.4127 0.0000 3,099.353 1 3,099.353 1 0.6486 0.0000 3,115.568 3 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2020 2.2532 23.1630 15.6142 0.0314 1.0328 1.1606 2.1935 0.2360 1.0839 1.2733 0.0000 3,099.353 1 3,099.353 1 0.6486 0.0000 3,115.5683 2021 5.2757 8.1326 7.6039 0.0130 0.2012 0.4461 0.5519 0.0534 0.4104 0.4230 0.0000 1,206.895 2 1,206.895 2 0.3593 0.0000 1,214.436 3 Maximum 5.2757 23.1630 15.6142 0.0314 1.0328 1.1606 2.1935 0.2360 1.0839 1.2733 0.0000 3,099.353 1 3,099.353 1 0.6486 0.0000 3,115.568 3 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.72 0.00 25.11 44.07 0.00 7.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 4 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.2440 5.0000e- 005 5.0100e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0107 0.0107 3.0000e- 005 0.0114 Energy 3.3500e- 003 0.0305 0.0256 1.8000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 36.5721 36.5721 7.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 004 36.7895 Mobile 2.3301 9.9541 19.0684 0.0537 4.0921 0.0483 4.1403 1.0948 0.0450 1.1398 5,470.027 9 5,470.027 9 0.3523 5,478.836 2 Total 2.5775 9.9847 19.0990 0.0538 4.0921 0.0506 4.1427 1.0948 0.0474 1.1421 5,506.610 7 5,506.610 7 0.3531 6.7000e- 004 5,515.637 0 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.2440 5.0000e- 005 5.0100e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0107 0.0107 3.0000e- 005 0.0114 Energy 3.3500e- 003 0.0305 0.0256 1.8000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 36.5721 36.5721 7.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 004 36.7895 Mobile 2.3301 9.9541 19.0684 0.0537 4.0921 0.0483 4.1403 1.0948 0.0450 1.1398 5,470.027 9 5,470.027 9 0.3523 5,478.836 2 Total 2.5775 9.9847 19.0990 0.0538 4.0921 0.0506 4.1427 1.0948 0.0474 1.1421 5,506.610 7 5,506.610 7 0.3531 6.7000e- 004 5,515.637 0 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 5 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 9/7/2020 9/18/2020 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/21/2020 10/9/2020 5 15 3 Grading Grading 10/12/2020 11/6/2020 5 20 4 Building Construction Building Construction 11/9/2020 2/12/2021 5 70 5 Paving Paving 2/15/2021 3/5/2021 5 15 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/8/2021 4/2/2021 5 20 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 16,350; Non-Residential Outdoor: 5,450; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 6 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 125 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 77.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 83.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 3.00 2.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 7 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.6734 0.0000 1.6734 0.2534 0.0000 0.2534 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.1525 1.1525 1.0761 1.0761 2,322.312 7 2,322.312 7 0.5970 2,337.236 3 Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.6734 1.1525 2.8259 0.2534 1.0761 1.3295 2,322.312 7 2,322.312 7 0.5970 2,337.236 3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 8 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0629 2.1734 0.4765 5.8800e- 003 0.1345 7.0500e- 003 0.1415 0.0369 6.7400e- 003 0.0436 637.5697 637.5697 0.0477 638.7609 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0642 0.0433 0.4805 1.4000e- 003 0.1453 1.1100e- 003 0.1464 0.0385 1.0200e- 003 0.0396 139.4707 139.4707 4.0100e- 003 139.5710 Total 0.1270 2.2167 0.9569 7.2800e- 003 0.2798 8.1600e- 003 0.2880 0.0754 7.7600e- 003 0.0832 777.0404 777.0404 0.0517 778.3320 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7530 0.0000 0.7530 0.1140 0.0000 0.1140 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 1.1525 1.1525 1.0761 1.0761 0.0000 2,322.312 7 2,322.312 7 0.5970 2,337.236 3 Total 2.1262 20.9463 14.6573 0.0241 0.7530 1.1525 1.9055 0.1140 1.0761 1.1902 0.0000 2,322.312 7 2,322.312 7 0.5970 2,337.236 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 9 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0629 2.1734 0.4765 5.8800e- 003 0.1345 7.0500e- 003 0.1415 0.0369 6.7400e- 003 0.0436 637.5697 637.5697 0.0477 638.7609 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0642 0.0433 0.4805 1.4000e- 003 0.1453 1.1100e- 003 0.1464 0.0385 1.0200e- 003 0.0396 139.4707 139.4707 4.0100e- 003 139.5710 Total 0.1270 2.2167 0.9569 7.2800e- 003 0.2798 8.1600e- 003 0.2880 0.0754 7.7600e- 003 0.0832 777.0404 777.0404 0.0517 778.3320 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9225 9.0637 6.8357 9.3100e- 003 0.5213 0.5213 0.4796 0.4796 902.2494 902.2494 0.2918 909.5446 Total 0.9225 9.0637 6.8357 9.3100e- 003 0.5303 0.5213 1.0516 0.0573 0.4796 0.5369 902.2494 902.2494 0.2918 909.5446 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 10 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0247 0.0167 0.1848 5.4000e- 004 0.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 3.9000e- 004 0.0152 53.6426 53.6426 1.5400e- 003 53.6812 Total 0.0247 0.0167 0.1848 5.4000e- 004 0.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 3.9000e- 004 0.0152 53.6426 53.6426 1.5400e- 003 53.6812 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.2386 0.0000 0.2386 0.0258 0.0000 0.0258 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.9225 9.0637 6.8357 9.3100e- 003 0.5213 0.5213 0.4796 0.4796 0.0000 902.2494 902.2494 0.2918 909.5445 Total 0.9225 9.0637 6.8357 9.3100e- 003 0.2386 0.5213 0.7599 0.0258 0.4796 0.5054 0.0000 902.2494 902.2494 0.2918 909.5445 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 11 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0247 0.0167 0.1848 5.4000e- 004 0.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 3.9000e- 004 0.0152 53.6426 53.6426 1.5400e- 003 53.6812 Total 0.0247 0.0167 0.1848 5.4000e- 004 0.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 3.9000e- 004 0.0152 53.6426 53.6426 1.5400e- 003 53.6812 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7578 0.0000 0.7578 0.4145 0.0000 0.4145 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8527 7.7248 8.0981 0.0120 0.4561 0.4561 0.4355 0.4355 1,151.7011 1,151.7011 0.2184 1,157.159 7 Total 0.8527 7.7248 8.0981 0.0120 0.7578 0.4561 1.2139 0.4145 0.4355 0.8500 1,151.701 1 1,151.701 1 0.2184 1,157.159 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 12 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0339 1.1714 0.2568 3.1700e- 003 0.0725 3.8000e- 003 0.0763 0.0199 3.6300e- 003 0.0235 343.6252 343.6252 0.0257 344.2673 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0493 0.0333 0.3696 1.0800e- 003 0.1118 8.5000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 107.2851 107.2851 3.0900e- 003 107.3623 Total 0.0832 1.2047 0.6264 4.2500e- 003 0.1843 4.6500e- 003 0.1889 0.0495 4.4200e- 003 0.0539 450.9104 450.9104 0.0288 451.6296 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.3410 0.0000 0.3410 0.1865 0.0000 0.1865 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.8527 7.7248 8.0981 0.0120 0.4561 0.4561 0.4355 0.4355 0.0000 1,151.7011 1,151.7011 0.2184 1,157.159 7 Total 0.8527 7.7248 8.0981 0.0120 0.3410 0.4561 0.7971 0.1865 0.4355 0.6220 0.0000 1,151.701 1 1,151.701 1 0.2184 1,157.159 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 13 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0339 1.1714 0.2568 3.1700e- 003 0.0725 3.8000e- 003 0.0763 0.0199 3.6300e- 003 0.0235 343.6252 343.6252 0.0257 344.2673 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0493 0.0333 0.3696 1.0800e- 003 0.1118 8.5000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 107.2851 107.2851 3.0900e- 003 107.3623 Total 0.0832 1.2047 0.6264 4.2500e- 003 0.1843 4.6500e- 003 0.1889 0.0495 4.4200e- 003 0.0539 450.9104 450.9104 0.0288 451.6296 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8568 8.7940 7.3646 0.0113 0.5200 0.5200 0.4784 0.4784 1,096.930 6 1,096.930 6 0.3548 1,105.799 8 Total 0.8568 8.7940 7.3646 0.0113 0.5200 0.5200 0.4784 0.4784 1,096.930 6 1,096.930 6 0.3548 1,105.799 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 14 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.9400e- 003 0.2106 0.0568 5.0000e- 004 0.0128 1.0600e- 003 0.0139 3.6800e- 003 1.0100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 53.0755 53.0755 3.7300e- 003 53.1688 Worker 0.0148 9.9900e- 003 0.1109 3.2000e- 004 0.0335 2.6000e- 004 0.0338 8.8900e- 003 2.4000e- 004 9.1300e- 003 32.1855 32.1855 9.3000e- 004 32.2087 Total 0.0217 0.2206 0.1677 8.2000e- 004 0.0463 1.3200e- 003 0.0477 0.0126 1.2500e- 003 0.0138 85.2610 85.2610 4.6600e- 003 85.3775 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.8568 8.7940 7.3646 0.0113 0.5200 0.5200 0.4784 0.4784 0.0000 1,096.930 6 1,096.930 6 0.3548 1,105.799 8 Total 0.8568 8.7940 7.3646 0.0113 0.5200 0.5200 0.4784 0.4784 0.0000 1,096.930 6 1,096.930 6 0.3548 1,105.799 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 15 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.9400e- 003 0.2106 0.0568 5.0000e- 004 0.0128 1.0600e- 003 0.0139 3.6800e- 003 1.0100e- 003 4.7000e- 003 53.0755 53.0755 3.7300e- 003 53.1688 Worker 0.0148 9.9900e- 003 0.1109 3.2000e- 004 0.0335 2.6000e- 004 0.0338 8.8900e- 003 2.4000e- 004 9.1300e- 003 32.1855 32.1855 9.3000e- 004 32.2087 Total 0.0217 0.2206 0.1677 8.2000e- 004 0.0463 1.3200e- 003 0.0477 0.0126 1.2500e- 003 0.0138 85.2610 85.2610 4.6600e- 003 85.3775 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7705 7.9325 7.2422 0.0113 0.4454 0.4454 0.4098 0.4098 1,097.168 8 1,097.168 8 0.3549 1,106.040 0 Total 0.7705 7.9325 7.2422 0.0113 0.4454 0.4454 0.4098 0.4098 1,097.168 8 1,097.168 8 0.3549 1,106.040 0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 16 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.9100e- 003 0.1911 0.0517 4.9000e- 004 0.0128 4.0000e- 004 0.0132 3.6800e- 003 3.9000e- 004 4.0700e- 003 52.6748 52.6748 3.5800e- 003 52.7642 Worker 0.0138 8.9900e- 003 0.1020 3.1000e- 004 0.0335 2.5000e- 004 0.0338 8.8900e- 003 2.3000e- 004 9.1200e- 003 31.1445 31.1445 8.4000e- 004 31.1655 Total 0.0198 0.2001 0.1537 8.0000e- 004 0.0463 6.5000e- 004 0.0470 0.0126 6.2000e- 004 0.0132 83.8193 83.8193 4.4200e- 003 83.9297 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7705 7.9325 7.2422 0.0113 0.4454 0.4454 0.4098 0.4098 0.0000 1,097.168 8 1,097.168 8 0.3549 1,106.040 0 Total 0.7705 7.9325 7.2422 0.0113 0.4454 0.4454 0.4098 0.4098 0.0000 1,097.168 8 1,097.168 8 0.3549 1,106.040 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 17 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 5.9100e- 003 0.1911 0.0517 4.9000e- 004 0.0128 4.0000e- 004 0.0132 3.6800e- 003 3.9000e- 004 4.0700e- 003 52.6748 52.6748 3.5800e- 003 52.7642 Worker 0.0138 8.9900e- 003 0.1020 3.1000e- 004 0.0335 2.5000e- 004 0.0338 8.8900e- 003 2.3000e- 004 9.1200e- 003 31.1445 31.1445 8.4000e- 004 31.1655 Total 0.0198 0.2001 0.1537 8.0000e- 004 0.0463 6.5000e- 004 0.0470 0.0126 6.2000e- 004 0.0132 83.8193 83.8193 4.4200e- 003 83.9297 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7131 6.6304 6.9921 0.0111 0.3492 0.3492 0.3247 0.3247 1,020.028 0 1,020.028 0 0.2966 1,027.443 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7131 6.6304 6.9921 0.0111 0.3492 0.3492 0.3247 0.3247 1,020.028 0 1,020.028 0 0.2966 1,027.443 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 18 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0830 0.0540 0.6118 1.8800e- 003 0.2012 1.4900e- 003 0.2027 0.0534 1.3700e- 003 0.0547 186.8672 186.8672 5.0300e- 003 186.9929 Total 0.0830 0.0540 0.6118 1.8800e- 003 0.2012 1.4900e- 003 0.2027 0.0534 1.3700e- 003 0.0547 186.8672 186.8672 5.0300e- 003 186.9929 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.7131 6.6304 6.9921 0.0111 0.3492 0.3492 0.3247 0.3247 0.0000 1,020.028 0 1,020.028 0 0.2966 1,027.443 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7131 6.6304 6.9921 0.0111 0.3492 0.3492 0.3247 0.3247 0.0000 1,020.028 0 1,020.028 0 0.2966 1,027.443 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 19 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0830 0.0540 0.6118 1.8800e- 003 0.2012 1.4900e- 003 0.2027 0.0534 1.3700e- 003 0.0547 186.8672 186.8672 5.0300e- 003 186.9929 Total 0.0830 0.0540 0.6118 1.8800e- 003 0.2012 1.4900e- 003 0.2027 0.0534 1.3700e- 003 0.0547 186.8672 186.8672 5.0300e- 003 186.9929 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 5.0522 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 5.2711 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 20 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6100e- 003 3.0000e- 003 0.0340 1.0000e- 004 0.0112 8.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 10.3815 10.3815 2.8000e- 004 10.3885 Total 4.6100e- 003 3.0000e- 003 0.0340 1.0000e- 004 0.0112 8.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 10.3815 10.3815 2.8000e- 004 10.3885 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 5.0522 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Total 5.2711 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 003 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 21 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.6100e- 003 3.0000e- 003 0.0340 1.0000e- 004 0.0112 8.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 10.3815 10.3815 2.8000e- 004 10.3885 Total 4.6100e- 003 3.0000e- 003 0.0340 1.0000e- 004 0.0112 8.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 10.3815 10.3815 2.8000e- 004 10.3885 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 22 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.3301 9.9541 19.0684 0.0537 4.0921 0.0483 4.1403 1.0948 0.0450 1.1398 5,470.027 9 5,470.027 9 0.3523 5,478.836 2 Unmitigated 2.3301 9.9541 19.0684 0.0537 4.0921 0.0483 4.1403 1.0948 0.0450 1.1398 5,470.027 9 5,470.027 9 0.3523 5,478.836 2 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center 656.11 656.11 656.11 878,891 878,891 Convenience Market (24 Hour)1,232.08 1,232.08 1232.08 1,046,475 1,046,475 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1,888.19 1,888.19 1,888.19 1,925,366 1,925,366 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 21 51 28 Convenience Market (24 Hour)16.60 8.40 6.90 0.90 80.10 19.00 24 15 61 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 23 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 3.3500e- 003 0.0305 0.0256 1.8000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 36.5721 36.5721 7.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 004 36.7895 NaturalGas Unmitigated 3.3500e- 003 0.0305 0.0256 1.8000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 36.5721 36.5721 7.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 004 36.7895 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.551391 0.043400 0.201050 0.120272 0.016162 0.005864 0.021029 0.030512 0.002059 0.001866 0.004766 0.000706 0.000924 Convenience Market (24 Hour)0.551391 0.043400 0.201050 0.120272 0.016162 0.005864 0.021029 0.030512 0.002059 0.001866 0.004766 0.000706 0.000924 Parking Lot 0.551391 0.043400 0.201050 0.120272 0.016162 0.005864 0.021029 0.030512 0.002059 0.001866 0.004766 0.000706 0.000924 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 24 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 277.712 2.9900e- 003 0.0272 0.0229 1.6000e- 004 2.0700e- 003 2.0700e- 003 2.0700e- 003 2.0700e- 003 32.6720 32.6720 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.8662 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 33.1507 3.6000e- 004 3.2500e- 003 2.7300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 3.9001 3.9001 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 3.9233 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.3500e- 003 0.0305 0.0256 1.8000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 36.5721 36.5721 7.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 004 36.7895 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 0.277712 2.9900e- 003 0.0272 0.0229 1.6000e- 004 2.0700e- 003 2.0700e- 003 2.0700e- 003 2.0700e- 003 32.6720 32.6720 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.8662 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 0.0331507 3.6000e- 004 3.2500e- 003 2.7300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 3.9001 3.9001 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 3.9233 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.3500e- 003 0.0305 0.0256 1.8000e- 004 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 2.3200e- 003 36.5721 36.5721 7.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 004 36.7895 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 25 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.2440 5.0000e- 005 5.0100e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0107 0.0107 3.0000e- 005 0.0114 Unmitigated 0.2440 5.0000e- 005 5.0100e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0107 0.0107 3.0000e- 005 0.0114 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0277 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.2158 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.7000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 5.0100e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0107 0.0107 3.0000e- 005 0.0114 Total 0.2440 5.0000e- 005 5.0100e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0107 0.0107 3.0000e- 005 0.0114 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 26 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0277 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.2158 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.7000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 5.0100e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0107 0.0107 3.0000e- 005 0.0114 Total 0.2440 5.0000e- 005 5.0100e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0107 0.0107 3.0000e- 005 0.0114 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 27 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:14 PMPage 28 of 28 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 38.00 Space 0.00 0.00 0 Automobile Care Center 4.85 1000sqft 1.86 4,850.00 0 Convenience Market (24 Hour)6.05 1000sqft 0.00 6,050.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2021Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1047.47 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 2501-2525 East Ball Road South Coast Air Basin, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 1 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Project Characteristics - APU Emission Factor - CO2 Intensity Factor Land Use - Convenenience Market 24 hr = 2,950 sq. ft. convenience store and 3,100 sq. ft. canopy structure. Automobile Care Center = 4,850 sq. ft. Car Wash. Construction Phase - Construction Schedule Provided by Applicant. Demolition - Demoliton assumption provided by Applicant. Grading - Import/Export Soil provided by Applicant. Off-road Equipment - Trips and VMT - Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rates from Traffic Study. Fleet Mix - Consumer Products - Road Dust - Area Coating - Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD RULE #403 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 15.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 20.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 70.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 15.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 20.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 664.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 223.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 15,200.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 2 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.34 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.11 1.86 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.14 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 187.00 174.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 247.00 255.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 231.00 226.00 tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 130.00 125.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 4.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 6.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 4.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 8.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 6.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 1047.47 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 135.28 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 863.10 203.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 135.28 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 758.45 203.65 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 135.28 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 737.99 203.65 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 3 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.0447 0.4495 0.3649 6.3000e- 004 0.0244 0.0245 0.0489 7.0500e- 003 0.0228 0.0298 0.0000 56.1298 56.1298 0.0135 0.0000 56.4680 2021 0.0709 0.1916 0.1903 3.2000e- 004 2.3000e- 003 0.0105 0.0128 6.1000e- 004 9.7500e- 003 0.0104 0.0000 27.5058 27.5058 7.2800e- 003 0.0000 27.6878 Maximum 0.0709 0.4495 0.3649 6.3000e- 004 0.0244 0.0245 0.0489 7.0500e- 003 0.0228 0.0298 0.0000 56.1298 56.1298 0.0135 0.0000 56.4680 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.0447 0.4495 0.3649 6.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0245 0.0379 3.8400e- 003 0.0228 0.0266 0.0000 56.1297 56.1297 0.0135 0.0000 56.4679 2021 0.0709 0.1916 0.1903 3.2000e- 004 2.3000e- 003 0.0105 0.0128 6.1000e- 004 9.7500e- 003 0.0104 0.0000 27.5058 27.5058 7.2800e- 003 0.0000 27.6878 Maximum 0.0709 0.4495 0.3649 6.3000e- 004 0.0135 0.0245 0.0379 3.8400e- 003 0.0228 0.0266 0.0000 56.1297 56.1297 0.0135 0.0000 56.4679 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.03 0.00 17.76 41.91 0.00 7.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 4 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0445 1.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2100e- 003 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.2900e- 003 Energy 6.1000e- 004 5.5600e- 003 4.6700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 58.4110 58.4110 1.5700e- 003 4.1000e- 004 58.5726 Mobile 0.4076 1.8432 3.4674 9.9400e- 003 0.7312 8.7000e- 003 0.7399 0.1959 8.1100e- 003 0.2041 0.0000 919.4408 919.4408 0.0570 0.0000 920.8664 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.4518 0.0000 7.4518 0.4404 0.0000 18.4615 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2869 8.5215 8.8084 0.0297 7.4000e- 004 9.7730 Total 0.4528 1.8487 3.4727 9.9700e- 003 0.7312 9.1200e- 003 0.7404 0.1959 8.5300e- 003 0.2045 7.7387 986.3745 994.1132 0.5287 1.1500e- 003 1,007.674 8 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-7-2020 12-6-2020 0.3673 0.3673 2 12-7-2020 3-6-2021 0.2761 0.2761 3 3-7-2021 6-6-2021 0.0632 0.0632 Highest 0.3673 0.3673 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 5 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0445 1.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2100e- 003 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.2900e- 003 Energy 6.1000e- 004 5.5600e- 003 4.6700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 58.4110 58.4110 1.5700e- 003 4.1000e- 004 58.5726 Mobile 0.4076 1.8432 3.4674 9.9400e- 003 0.7312 8.7000e- 003 0.7399 0.1959 8.1100e- 003 0.2041 0.0000 919.4408 919.4408 0.0570 0.0000 920.8664 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.4518 0.0000 7.4518 0.4404 0.0000 18.4615 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2869 8.5215 8.8084 0.0297 7.4000e- 004 9.7730 Total 0.4528 1.8487 3.4727 9.9700e- 003 0.7312 9.1200e- 003 0.7404 0.1959 8.5300e- 003 0.2045 7.7387 986.3745 994.1132 0.5287 1.1500e- 003 1,007.674 8 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 6 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 9/7/2020 9/18/2020 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/21/2020 10/9/2020 5 15 3 Grading Grading 10/12/2020 11/6/2020 5 20 4 Building Construction Building Construction 11/9/2020 2/12/2021 5 70 5 Paving Paving 2/15/2021 3/5/2021 5 15 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/8/2021 4/2/2021 5 20 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 16,350; Non-Residential Outdoor: 5,450; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 7 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 125 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 77.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 83.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 3.00 2.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 8 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 8.3700e- 003 0.0000 8.3700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.3800e- 003 5.3800e- 003 0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e- 003 0.0000 10.6015 Total 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e- 004 8.3700e- 003 5.7600e- 003 0.0141 1.2700e- 003 5.3800e- 003 6.6500e- 003 0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e- 003 0.0000 10.6015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 9 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 3.1000e- 004 0.0111 2.3000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.9211 2.9211 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.9264 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 2.4700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.6426 0.6426 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6431 Total 6.0000e- 004 0.0113 4.7700e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.3700e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 3.7000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.5637 3.5637 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.5695 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 3.7700e- 003 0.0000 3.7700e- 003 5.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e- 004 5.7600e- 003 5.7600e- 003 5.3800e- 003 5.3800e- 003 0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e- 003 0.0000 10.6015 Total 0.0106 0.1047 0.0733 1.2000e- 004 3.7700e- 003 5.7600e- 003 9.5300e- 003 5.7000e- 004 5.3800e- 003 5.9500e- 003 0.0000 10.5338 10.5338 2.7100e- 003 0.0000 10.6015 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 10 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 3.1000e- 004 0.0111 2.3000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.9211 2.9211 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.9264 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 2.4700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.6426 0.6426 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6431 Total 6.0000e- 004 0.0113 4.7700e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.3700e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 3.7000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.5637 3.5637 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.5695 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 3.9800e- 003 0.0000 3.9800e- 003 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.9200e- 003 0.0680 0.0513 7.0000e- 005 3.9100e- 003 3.9100e- 003 3.6000e- 003 3.6000e- 003 0.0000 6.1388 6.1388 1.9900e- 003 0.0000 6.1884 Total 6.9200e- 003 0.0680 0.0513 7.0000e- 005 3.9800e- 003 3.9100e- 003 7.8900e- 003 4.3000e- 004 3.6000e- 003 4.0300e- 003 0.0000 6.1388 6.1388 1.9900e- 003 0.0000 6.1884 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 11 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3707 0.3707 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3710 Total 1.7000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3707 0.3707 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3710 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 1.7900e- 003 0.0000 1.7900e- 003 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.9200e- 003 0.0680 0.0513 7.0000e- 005 3.9100e- 003 3.9100e- 003 3.6000e- 003 3.6000e- 003 0.0000 6.1388 6.1388 1.9900e- 003 0.0000 6.1884 Total 6.9200e- 003 0.0680 0.0513 7.0000e- 005 1.7900e- 003 3.9100e- 003 5.7000e- 003 1.9000e- 004 3.6000e- 003 3.7900e- 003 0.0000 6.1388 6.1388 1.9900e- 003 0.0000 6.1884 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 12 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.7000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3707 0.3707 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3710 Total 1.7000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.3707 0.3707 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3710 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.5800e- 003 0.0000 7.5800e- 003 4.1500e- 003 0.0000 4.1500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.5300e- 003 0.0773 0.0810 1.2000e- 004 4.5600e- 003 4.5600e- 003 4.3500e- 003 4.3500e- 003 0.0000 10.4481 10.4481 1.9800e- 003 0.0000 10.4976 Total 8.5300e- 003 0.0773 0.0810 1.2000e- 004 7.5800e- 003 4.5600e- 003 0.0121 4.1500e- 003 4.3500e- 003 8.5000e- 003 0.0000 10.4481 10.4481 1.9800e- 003 0.0000 10.4976 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 13 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 3.3000e- 004 0.0119 2.4800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 7.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.1487 3.1487 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.1544 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.5000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.7900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9886 0.9886 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9893 Total 7.8000e- 004 0.0123 6.2700e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.8100e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 4.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.1374 4.1374 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 4.1438 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 3.4100e- 003 0.0000 3.4100e- 003 1.8700e- 003 0.0000 1.8700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.5300e- 003 0.0773 0.0810 1.2000e- 004 4.5600e- 003 4.5600e- 003 4.3500e- 003 4.3500e- 003 0.0000 10.4480 10.4480 1.9800e- 003 0.0000 10.4976 Total 8.5300e- 003 0.0773 0.0810 1.2000e- 004 3.4100e- 003 4.5600e- 003 7.9700e- 003 1.8700e- 003 4.3500e- 003 6.2200e- 003 0.0000 10.4480 10.4480 1.9800e- 003 0.0000 10.4976 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 14 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 3.3000e- 004 0.0119 2.4800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 7.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.1487 3.1487 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.1544 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.5000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 3.7900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.9886 0.9886 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9893 Total 7.8000e- 004 0.0123 6.2700e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.8100e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.8600e- 003 4.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.1374 4.1374 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 4.1438 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0167 0.1715 0.1436 2.2000e- 004 0.0101 0.0101 9.3300e- 003 9.3300e- 003 0.0000 19.4048 19.4048 6.2800e- 003 0.0000 19.5617 Total 0.0167 0.1715 0.1436 2.2000e- 004 0.0101 0.0101 9.3300e- 003 9.3300e- 003 0.0000 19.4048 19.4048 6.2800e- 003 0.0000 19.5617 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 15 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3000e- 004 4.1800e- 003 1.0500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9541 0.9541 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9557 Worker 2.6000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.2200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 6.5000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.5784 0.5784 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5788 Total 3.9000e- 004 4.3800e- 003 3.2700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.2000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.5325 1.5325 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.5345 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0167 0.1715 0.1436 2.2000e- 004 0.0101 0.0101 9.3300e- 003 9.3300e- 003 0.0000 19.4048 19.4048 6.2800e- 003 0.0000 19.5617 Total 0.0167 0.1715 0.1436 2.2000e- 004 0.0101 0.0101 9.3300e- 003 9.3300e- 003 0.0000 19.4048 19.4048 6.2800e- 003 0.0000 19.5617 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 16 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3000e- 004 4.1800e- 003 1.0500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9541 0.9541 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9557 Worker 2.6000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 2.2200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 6.5000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.5784 0.5784 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5788 Total 3.9000e- 004 4.3800e- 003 3.2700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 8.9000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.2000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.5325 1.5325 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.5345 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0119 0.1230 0.1123 1.8000e- 004 6.9000e- 003 6.9000e- 003 6.3500e- 003 6.3500e- 003 0.0000 15.4277 15.4277 4.9900e- 003 0.0000 15.5524 Total 0.0119 0.1230 0.1123 1.8000e- 004 6.9000e- 003 6.9000e- 003 6.3500e- 003 6.3500e- 003 0.0000 15.4277 15.4277 4.9900e- 003 0.0000 15.5524 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 17 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.0000e- 005 3.0200e- 003 7.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7527 0.7527 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7539 Worker 1.9000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.6200e- 003 0.0000 5.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.1000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4448 0.4448 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4451 Total 2.8000e- 004 3.1600e- 003 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.1975 1.1975 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.1991 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0119 0.1230 0.1123 1.8000e- 004 6.9000e- 003 6.9000e- 003 6.3500e- 003 6.3500e- 003 0.0000 15.4277 15.4277 4.9900e- 003 0.0000 15.5524 Total 0.0119 0.1230 0.1123 1.8000e- 004 6.9000e- 003 6.9000e- 003 6.3500e- 003 6.3500e- 003 0.0000 15.4277 15.4277 4.9900e- 003 0.0000 15.5524 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 18 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 9.0000e- 005 3.0200e- 003 7.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7527 0.7527 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7539 Worker 1.9000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.6200e- 003 0.0000 5.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.1000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.4448 0.4448 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4451 Total 2.8000e- 004 3.1600e- 003 2.3800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.1975 1.1975 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.1991 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 5.3500e- 003 0.0497 0.0524 8.0000e- 005 2.6200e- 003 2.6200e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 0.0000 6.9402 6.9402 2.0200e- 003 0.0000 6.9906 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.3500e- 003 0.0497 0.0524 8.0000e- 005 2.6200e- 003 2.6200e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 0.0000 6.9402 6.9402 2.0200e- 003 0.0000 6.9906 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 19 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.7100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4900e- 003 3.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.2915 1.2915 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2924 Total 5.6000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.7100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4900e- 003 3.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.2915 1.2915 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2924 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 5.3500e- 003 0.0497 0.0524 8.0000e- 005 2.6200e- 003 2.6200e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 0.0000 6.9402 6.9402 2.0200e- 003 0.0000 6.9906 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.3500e- 003 0.0497 0.0524 8.0000e- 005 2.6200e- 003 2.6200e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 0.0000 6.9402 6.9402 2.0200e- 003 0.0000 6.9906 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 20 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.7100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4900e- 003 3.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.2915 1.2915 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2924 Total 5.6000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.7100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4900e- 003 3.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.2915 1.2915 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2924 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1900e- 003 0.0153 0.0182 3.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5576 Total 0.0527 0.0153 0.0182 3.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5576 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 21 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0957 0.0957 0.0000 0.0000 0.0957 Total 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0957 0.0957 0.0000 0.0000 0.0957 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1900e- 003 0.0153 0.0182 3.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5576 Total 0.0527 0.0153 0.0182 3.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 2.5576 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 22 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0957 0.0957 0.0000 0.0000 0.0957 Total 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0957 0.0957 0.0000 0.0000 0.0957 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 23 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.4076 1.8432 3.4674 9.9400e- 003 0.7312 8.7000e- 003 0.7399 0.1959 8.1100e- 003 0.2041 0.0000 919.4408 919.4408 0.0570 0.0000 920.8664 Unmitigated 0.4076 1.8432 3.4674 9.9400e- 003 0.7312 8.7000e- 003 0.7399 0.1959 8.1100e- 003 0.2041 0.0000 919.4408 919.4408 0.0570 0.0000 920.8664 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center 656.11 656.11 656.11 878,891 878,891 Convenience Market (24 Hour)1,232.08 1,232.08 1232.08 1,046,475 1,046,475 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1,888.19 1,888.19 1,888.19 1,925,366 1,925,366 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 21 51 28 Convenience Market (24 Hour)16.60 8.40 6.90 0.90 80.10 19.00 24 15 61 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 24 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 52.3561 52.3561 1.4500e- 003 3.0000e- 004 52.4817 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 52.3561 52.3561 1.4500e- 003 3.0000e- 004 52.4817 NaturalGas Mitigated 6.1000e- 004 5.5600e- 003 4.6700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 6.0549 6.0549 1.2000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 6.0909 NaturalGas Unmitigated 6.1000e- 004 5.5600e- 003 4.6700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 6.0549 6.0549 1.2000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 6.0909 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.551391 0.043400 0.201050 0.120272 0.016162 0.005864 0.021029 0.030512 0.002059 0.001866 0.004766 0.000706 0.000924 Convenience Market (24 Hour)0.551391 0.043400 0.201050 0.120272 0.016162 0.005864 0.021029 0.030512 0.002059 0.001866 0.004766 0.000706 0.000924 Parking Lot 0.551391 0.043400 0.201050 0.120272 0.016162 0.005864 0.021029 0.030512 0.002059 0.001866 0.004766 0.000706 0.000924 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 25 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 101365 5.5000e- 004 4.9700e- 003 4.1700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 5.4092 5.4092 1.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 5.4414 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 12100 7.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6457 0.6457 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.6495 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.2000e- 004 5.5600e- 003 4.6700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 6.0549 6.0549 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 6.0909 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 101365 5.5000e- 004 4.9700e- 003 4.1700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 5.4092 5.4092 1.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 5.4414 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 12100 7.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6457 0.6457 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.6495 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.2000e- 004 5.5600e- 003 4.6700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 6.0549 6.0549 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 6.0909 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 26 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 40982.5 19.4718 5.4000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 19.5185 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 69212 32.8843 9.1000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 32.9632 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 52.3561 1.4500e- 003 3.0000e- 004 52.4817 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 40982.5 19.4718 5.4000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 19.5185 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 69212 32.8843 9.1000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 32.9632 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 52.3561 1.4500e- 003 3.0000e- 004 52.4817 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 27 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0445 1.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2100e- 003 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.2900e- 003 Unmitigated 0.0445 1.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2100e- 003 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.2900e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 5.0500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0394 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2100e- 003 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.2900e- 003 Total 0.0445 1.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2100e- 003 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.2900e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 28 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 5.0500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0394 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2100e- 003 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.2900e- 003 Total 0.0445 1.0000e- 005 6.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2100e- 003 1.2100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.2900e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 29 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 8.8084 0.0297 7.4000e- 004 9.7730 Unmitigated 8.8084 0.0297 7.4000e- 004 9.7730 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Automobile Care Center 0.456293 / 0.279664 4.4439 0.0150 3.8000e- 004 4.9306 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 0.448139 / 0.274666 4.3645 0.0147 3.7000e- 004 4.8424 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.8084 0.0297 7.5000e- 004 9.7730 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 30 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Automobile Care Center 0.456293 / 0.279664 4.4439 0.0150 3.8000e- 004 4.9306 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 0.448139 / 0.274666 4.3645 0.0147 3.7000e- 004 4.8424 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.8084 0.0297 7.5000e- 004 9.7730 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 31 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 7.4518 0.4404 0.0000 18.4615 Unmitigated 7.4518 0.4404 0.0000 18.4615 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Automobile Care Center 18.53 3.7614 0.2223 0.0000 9.3188 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 18.18 3.6904 0.2181 0.0000 9.1428 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.4518 0.4404 0.0000 18.4615 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 32 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Automobile Care Center 18.53 3.7614 0.2223 0.0000 9.3188 Convenience Market (24 Hour) 18.18 3.6904 0.2181 0.0000 9.1428 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.4518 0.4404 0.0000 18.4615 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 33 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 7/10/2020 8:18 PMPage 34 of 34 2501-2525 East Ball Road - South Coast Air Basin, Annual City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Appendix B – Trip Generation Report 101 Pacifica | Suite 300 | Irvine, CA 92618 | (949) 308-6300 | Fax (949) 859-3209 www.fehrandpeers.com MEMORANDUM Date: July 31, 2019 To: IIan Golech, Golech Group From: Paul Herrmann, P.E. Mae Tamayo Subject: Trip Generation Assessment for the Ball and Sunkist Gas Station and Car Wash OC19-0658 This memorandum documents a trip generation assessment conducted by Fehr & Peers for the proposed gas station, 7-Eleven, and car wash (Project) located at the northeast corner of East Ball Road & Sunkist Street in Anaheim, California. The Project trip generation was estimated and reviewed at the request of the City of Anaheim. This memorandum is organized into the following sections: Project Description, Trip Generation for the Project, Trip Generation for the existing site and net new Trip Generation. Project Description The Project will replace an existing 20,200 square-foot (SF) shopping center with a gas station with 12 vehicle fuel positions, 3,010 SF 7-Eleven convenience store, and 4,480 SF automated car wash facility located at the northeast corner of East Ball Road & Sunkist Street in Anaheim, California. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the Project and existing shopping center were determined using trip generation rates from Trip Generation, 10th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers [ITE], 2017) as approved by the City. Project Trip Generation Estimate Trip generation rates for the Project (ITE Land Use Codes 945 and 948) were used to estimate the number of trips. The ITE trip generation rate for an automated car wash (ITE Land Use Code 948) does not include rates for the AM peak period. In order to estimate the AM peak period trips, empirical data collected from a traffic impact analysis (TIA) for a similar automated car wash was Ilan Golech July 31, 2019 Page 2 referenced1. The car wash PM data presented in this TIA, is higher than the PM ITE trip generation rates, and therefore, the AM data is considered to be a conservative rate. Pass-by reduction rates were determined using the LADOT Transportation Impact Study Guidelines (2016)2. Fehr and Peers applied a 50% pass-by reduction for the gas station with convenience market and 20% pass-by reduction for the automated car wash. A 10% internalization reduction rate was assumed for compatible land uses. It can be assumed that 10% of vehicle trips from the car wash will be users of the adjacent gas station. As presented in Table 1, the Project is expected to generate an estimated net external 1,912 daily trips, including 117 trips (59 inbound/58 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 134 trips (68 inbound/66 outbound) during the PM peak hour. Shopping Center Trip Generation Since the Project will be replacing an existing shopping center, trip generation rates for Shopping Center (ITE Land Use Code 820) from Trip Generation, 10th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers [ITE], 2017) were used to determine the existing trip generation. The existing project square footage was estimated using aerial photos. Given the proximity to the freeway and the local serving uses at the shopping center, Fehr and Peers applied a 50% pass-by reduction for the existing site. As presented in Table 1, the existing shopping center generates net 381 daily trips, including 9 trips (6 inbound/3 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 38 trips (18 inbound/20 outbound) during the PM peak hour. Site Trip Generation Estimate As presented in Table 1, the Project site is expected to generate an estimated net new 1,531 daily trips, including 108 trips (53 inbound/55 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 96 trips (50 inbound/46 outbound) during the PM peak hour. 1 Matt’s Express Car Wash TIA, City of Redlands. Kunzman Associates, Inc., 2014. 2 These rates were derived from the “Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Recommended Practice”, 2003. TA B L E 1 TR I P G E N E R A T I O N E S T I M A T E BA L L R O A D & S U N K I S T S T R E E T G A S S T A T I O N A N D C A R W A S H IT E L a n d Tr i p G e n e r a t i o n R a t e s [ a ] E s t i m a t e d T r i p G e n e r a t i o n La n d U s e U s e S i z e Da i l y T r i p R a t e D a i l y A M P e a k H o u r T r i p s P M P e a k H o u r T r i p s Co d e Ra t e R a t e % I n % O u t R a t e % I n % O u t U n i t T r i p s I n O u t T o t a l I n O u t T o t a l Pr o j e c t Ga s S t a t i o n w i t h C o n v e n i e n c e M a r k e t 9 4 5 1 2 v f p 2 0 5 . 3 6 1 2 . 4 7 5 1 % 4 9 % 1 3 . 9 9 5 1 % 4 9 % p e r v f p 2 , 4 6 5 7 7 7 3 1 5 0 8 6 8 2 1 6 8 Pa s s - b y r e d u c t i o n ( 5 0 % ) -1 , 2 3 3 - 3 9 - 3 6 -7 5 -43 - 4 1 - 8 4 Ne t G a s S t a t i o n w i t h C o n v e n i e n c e M a r k e t T r i p s 1, 2 3 2 3 8 3 7 7 5 4 3 4 1 8 4 Au t o m a t e d C a r W a s h 94 8 4 . 8 4 0 k s f [ b ] [ b ] 14 . 2 5 0 % 5 0 % p e r k s f 94 4 2 9 2 9 5 8 3 5 3 4 6 9 In t e r n a l i z a t i o n r e d u c t i o n ( 1 0 % ) -9 4 - 3 - 3 - 6 -4 - 3 - 7 Ne t A u t o m a t e d C a r W a s h T r i p s w i t h I n t e r n a l i z a t i o n 85 0 2 6 2 6 5 2 3 1 3 1 6 2 Pa s s - b y r e d u c t i o n ( 2 0 % ) -1 7 0 -5 -5 -1 0 -6 -6 -1 2 Ne t A u t o m a t e d C a r W a s h T r i p s 68 0 2 1 2 1 4 2 2 5 2 5 5 0 Pr o j e c t T r i p s T o t a l 1, 9 1 2 5 9 5 8 1 1 7 6 8 6 6 1 3 4 Ex i s t i n g Sh o p p i n g C e n t e r 8 2 0 2 0 . 2 0 0 k s f 3 7 . 7 5 0 . 9 4 6 2 % 3 8 % 3 . 8 1 4 8 % 5 2 % p e r k s f 7 6 3 1 2 7 1 9 3 7 4 0 7 7 Pa s s - b y r e d u c t i o n ( 5 0 % ) -3 8 2 - 6 - 4 - 1 0 - 1 9 - 2 0 - 3 9 Ne t E x i s t i n g C r e d i t 38 1 6 3 9 1 8 2 0 3 8 Ne t N e w E x t e r n a l T r i p s 1, 5 3 1 5 3 5 5 1 0 8 5 0 4 6 9 6 No t e s : a. S o u r c e : I n s t i t u t e o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n E n g i n e e r s ( I T E ) , Tr i p G e n e r a t i o n , 1 0 t h E d i t i o n , 2 0 1 7 , u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d . b. D r i v e w a y c o u n t s a t s i m i l a r l a n d u s e i n C i t y o f R e d l a n d s . M a t t ' s E x p r e s s C a r W a s h T I A , K u n z m a n A s s o c i a t e s , I N C . 2 0 1 4 c. v f p = v e h i c l e f u e l p o s i t i o n d. ks f = 1 , 0 0 0 s q u a r e f e e t e. 1 0 % I n t e r n a l i z a t i o n r e d u c t i o n w a s a s s u m e d f o r c o m p a t i b l e l a n d u s e t y p e f. P a s s - b y r e d u c t i o n s v a l u e s f r o m L A D O T T I S G u i d e l i n e s , 2 0 1 6 . T h e s e r a t e s w e r e d e r i v e d f r o m t h e " T r i p G e n e r a t i o n H a n d b o o k : A n I T E R e c o m m e n d e d P r a c t i c e " , 2 0 0 3 . AM P e a k H o u r P M P e a k H o u r City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Appendix C – Traffic Impact Analysis 2 <UNHIDDEN> prepared by Bryan Crawford Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana, California 92705 714.795.3100 | www.ganddini.com 19-0202 BALL-SUNKIST 7-ELEVEN & CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Anaheim August 26, 2020 3 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis i 19-0202 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Description ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Analysis Scenarios ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology..................................................................................................... 4 Intersection Delay Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 4 Performance Standards .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Need for Improvements ............................................................................................................................................. 5 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Roadway System .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Pedestrian Facilities ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Bicycle Routes .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Transit Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Truck Routes ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 General Plan Context .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Existing (2018) Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................................... 7 Existing ICU/Delay and Level of Service ................................................................................................................ 8 4. PROJECT TRIP FORECASTS ............................................................................................................................. 20 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................................... 20 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ........................................................................................................... 20 5. FUTURE VOLUME FORECASTS ...................................................................................................................... 29 Cumulative Trips ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 Ambient Growth Rate .................................................................................................................................. 29 Other Development ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Analysis Scenario Volume Forecasts .................................................................................................................... 29 Existing Plus Project ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Existing Plus Cumulative .............................................................................................................................. 29 Opening Year Without Project ................................................................................................................... 29 Opening Year With Project ......................................................................................................................... 30 6. FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 48 Existing Plus Project ................................................................................................................................................. 48 Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................................................................................... 48 Operational Impact Evaluation ................................................................................................................... 48 Existing Plus Cumulative ......................................................................................................................................... 48 Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................................................................................... 48 Opening Year Without Project .............................................................................................................................. 49 Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................................................................................... 49 Opening Year With Project .................................................................................................................................... 49 Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................................................................................... 49 Operational Impact Evaluation ................................................................................................................... 49 7. ON-SITE PARKING AND QUEUING ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 56 Municipal Code Off-Street Parking Requirements ............................................................................................ 56 Car Wash Parking Demand Analysis .................................................................................................................... 56 4 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis ii 19-0202 Parking Demand and Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 57 Queuing Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 57 Vacuum Parking Stalls .............................................................................................................................................. 58 8. VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ............................................................................................................... 62 Background ................................................................................................................................................................ 62 VMT Assessment and Screening ........................................................................................................................... 62 9. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 63 Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................................................................ 63 On-Site Parking and Queuing ................................................................................................................................ 63 General Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 63 APPENDICES Appendix A Glossary Appendix B Scoping Agreement Appendix C Volume Count Worksheets Appendix D Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E Parking and Queuing Data 5 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis iii 19-0202 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Existing Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................................................................ 9 Table 2. Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................... 21 Table 3. Other Development Trip Generation ....................................................................................................... 31 Table 4. Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service .............................................................................. 50 Table 5. Existing Plus Project Significant Impact Evaluation ............................................................................... 51 Table 6. Existing Plus Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service....................................................................... 52 Table 7. Opening Year Without Project Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................... 53 Table 8. Opening Year With Project Intersection Levels of Service .................................................................. 54 Table 9. Opening Year With Project Significant Impact Evaluation ................................................................... 55 Table 10. Weekday Vehicle Queue and Parking Demand Survey ........................................................................ 59 Table 11. Saturday Vehicle Queue and Parking Demand Survey ......................................................................... 60 Table 12. Drive Through Car Wash Lane Queuing Analysis ................................................................................. 61 6 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis iv 19-0202 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location Map ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Site Plan .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3. Existing Lane Geometry and Intersection Traffic Controls .................................................................. 10 Figure 4. Existing Pedestrian Facilities ....................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 5. City of Anaheim Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities ....................................................................... 12 Figure 6. City of Anaheim Transit Routes ................................................................................................................. 13 Figure 7. City of Anaheim Truck Route Map ............................................................................................................ 14 Figure 8. City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element ............................................................................... 15 Figure 9. City of Anaheim General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections ...................................................................... 16 Figure 10. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................... 17 Figure 11. Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ................................................... 18 Figure 12. Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .................................................... 19 Figure 13. Project Outbound Trip Distribution .......................................................................................................... 22 Figure 14. Project Inbound Trip Distribution .............................................................................................................. 23 Figure 15. Project Outbound Pass-By Trip Distribution .......................................................................................... 24 Figure 16. Project Inbound Pass-By Trip Distribution .............................................................................................. 25 Figure 17. Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................................... 26 Figure 18. Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .................................................... 27 Figure 19. Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................................................... 28 Figure 20. Other Development Location Map ........................................................................................................... 32 Figure 21. Other Development Average Daily Traffic Volumes............................................................................. 33 Figure 22. Other Development AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................ 34 Figure 23. Other Development PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................. 35 Figure 24. Existing Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes............................................................................. 36 Figure 25. Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................ 37 Figure 26. Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................. 38 Figure 27. Existing Plus Cumulative Average Daily Traffic Volumes ..................................................................... 39 Figure 28. Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes..................... 40 Figure 29. Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................... 41 Figure 30. Opening Year Without Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes .......................................................... 42 Figure 31. Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.......... 43 Figure 32. Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .......... 44 Figure 33. Opening Year With Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ................................................................ 45 Figure 34. Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ................ 46 Figure 35. Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ................ 47 7 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis ES-1 19-0202 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this analysis is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash project and to identify measures necessary to mitigate potentially significant traffic impacts. This report analyzes traffic impacts for the anticipated project opening year in 2021. Although this is a technical report, effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A glossary of terms is provided in Appendix A to assist the reader with terms related to transportation engineering. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at the northeast corner of Sunkist Street and Ball Road in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project involves demolishing the existing 20,200 square feet of commercial retail and replacing it with a gasoline/service station with 12 vehicle fueling positions, convenience market, and an automated car wash. The proposed project is anticipated to be constructed and fully operational by year 2021. EXISTING OPERATIONS The study intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing conditions (see Table 1). PROJECT TRIPS The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 102 net new trips during the AM peak hour, 124 net new trips during the PM peak hour, and 1,507 net new daily trips (see Table 2). FORECAST TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Existing Plus Project: The study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour (see Table 4): Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although these intersections are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour, additional mitigation is not recommended for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience any delay. These southbound right turning vehicles can queue within the project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right turning vehicles during the PM peak hour is 47.37 feet for the project west driveway and 23.17 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. 8 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis ES-2 19-0202 Based on the established operational thresholds, the proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions (see Table 5). Existing Plus Cumulative: The study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Cumulative conditions (see Table 6). Opening Year Without Project: The study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year Without Project conditions (see Table 7). Opening Year With Project: The study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year With Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour (see Table 8): Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS F) Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although these intersections are forecast to operate at Level of Service E/F during the PM peak hour, additional improvements are not recommended for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience any delay. These southbound right turning vehicles can queue within the project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right turning vehicles during the PM peak hour is 52.25 feet for the project west driveway and 25.34 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. The proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for Opening Year With Project conditions (see Table 9). NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS No off-site improvements were identified since the proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for the scenarios analyzed. ON-SITE PARKING AND QUEUING Sufficient off-street parking is provided for both the gasoline station/convenience market and the car wash components of the proposed project. Adequate drive through car wash lane queuing capacity is anticipated to be provided for the project site. The position of the vacuum parking stalls perpendicular to the east-west drive aisle and the car wash tunnel appears to be sufficient, and redesign (such as angled parking of these vacuum parking stalls) does not appear to be necessary. 9 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 1 19-0202 1. INTRODUCTION This section describes the purpose of this analysis, project description, study area, and analysis scenarios. Figure 1 shows the project location map and Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this analysis is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash project and to identify measures necessary to mitigate potentially significant traffic impacts. This report analyzes traffic impacts for the anticipated project opening year in 2021. Although this is a technical report, effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A glossary of terms is provided in Appendix A to assist the reader with terms related to transportation engineering. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at the northeast corner of Sunkist Street and Ball Road in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project involves demolishing the existing 20,200 square feet of commercial retail and replacing it with a 12 fueling position gasoline/service station with convenience market and an automated car wash. The proposed project is anticipated to be constructed and fully operational by year 2021. STUDY AREA Based on the study intersections identified in the approved scoping agreement (Appendix B), the study area consists of the following study intersections within the City of Anaheim and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) jurisdictions: Study Intersections Jurisdiction 1. Sunkist Street (NS) at Project Driveway (EW) City of Anaheim 2. Sunkist Street (NS) at Ball Road (EW) City of Anaheim 3. Project West Driveway (NS) at Ball Road (EW) City of Anaheim 4. Project East Driveway (NS) at Ball Road (EW) City of Anaheim 5. SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Road (EW) California Department of Transportation 6. SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Road (EW) California Department of Transportation ANALYSIS SCENARIOS The following scenarios are analyzed for weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions: Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project Conditions Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions Opening Year Without Project Conditions Opening Year With Project Conditions 110 F i g u r e 1 P r o j e c t L o c a t i o n M a p B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 5 7 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# S i t e 2 1 1 F i g u r e 2 S i t e P l a n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N 3 1 2 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 4 19-0202 2. METHODOLOGY This section discusses the analysis methodologies used to assess transportation facility performance as adopted by the respective jurisdictional agencies. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION METHODOLOGY Analysis of signalized intersections within the City of Anaheim is based on the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The ICU methodology compares the traffic volume using the intersection to the capacity of the intersection. The resulting volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity. The volume-to-capacity ratio is then correlated to a performance measure known as Level of Service based on the following thresholds: Level of Service Volume/Capacity Ratio A ≤ 0.600 B 0.601 to 0.700 C 0.701 to 0.800 D 0.801 to 0.900 E 0.901 to 1.000 F > 1.000 Source: Transportation Research Board, Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Circular No. 212, January 1980. Level of Service is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from Level of Service A (free-flow conditions) to Level of Service F (extreme congestion and system failure). ICU analysis was performed using the Vistro (Version 6.00-03) software. Based on City of Anaheim guidelines1, the ICU analysis utilizes the following parameters: 1,700 vehicles per hour per lane and a total clearance adjustment of 5 percent (i.e., 0.05 added to critical Volume/Capacity). INTERSECTION DELAY METHODOLOGY The technique used to assess the performance of unsignalized intersections and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) facilities is known as the intersection delay methodology based on the procedures contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 6th Edition). The methodology considers the traffic volume and distribution of movements, traffic composition, geometric characteristics, and signalization details to calculate the average control delay per vehicle and corresponding Level of Service. Control delay is defined as the portion of delay attributed to the intersection traffic control (such as a traffic signal or stop sign) and includes initial deceleration, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The intersection control delay is then correlated to Level of Service based on the following thresholds: 1 City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Studies Criteria; date unspecified. 413 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 5 19-0202 Level of Service Intersection Control Delay (Seconds/Vehicle) Unsignalized Intersection A ≤ 10.0 B > 10.0 to ≤ 15.0 C > 15.0 to ≤ 25.0 D > 25.0 to ≤ 35.0 E > 35.0 to ≤ 50.0 F > 50.0 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition). Level of Service is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from Level of Service A (free-flow conditions) to Level of Service F (extreme congestion and system failure). At intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, Level of Service is determined by the average control delay for the overall intersection. At intersections with cross street stop control (i.e., one- or two-way stop control), Level of Service is determined by the average control delay for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane). Intersection delay analysis was performed using the Vistro (Version 6.00-03) software based on default values recommended in the Highway Capacity Manual. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The City of Anaheim has established Level of Service D as the minimum acceptable Level of Service. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) endeavors to maintain a target Level of Service at the transition between Level of Service C and D (maximum 35 seconds of control delay). If an existing facility, or study area intersection for purposes of this analysis, operates at an unacceptable Level of Service, then the existing control delay should be maintained. The lead agency may consult with the California Department of Transportation to determine the appropriate target Level of Service if the maximum 35 seconds of control delay is not feasible. NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS City of Anaheim For signalized study intersections within the City of Anaheim jurisdiction, a project traffic impact is considered to occur in accordance with the following table: Level of Service Final V/C Ratio Project-Related Increase in V/C C > 0.700 - 0.800 equal to or greater than 0.050 D > 0.800 - 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.030 E,F > 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.010 The City of Anaheim has not established operational impact thresholds for unsignalized intersections. As such, the Caltrans thresholds have been utilized for unsignalized intersections. A project traffic operational impact at an unsignalized intersection occurs if the addition of project-generated trips increases the delay by 10 seconds or more and/or causes Level of Service E or F. If a project is forecast to cause an operational traffic impact, feasible improvements that will reduce the impact shall be identified. Improvements can be in many forms, including the addition of lanes, traffic control 514 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 6 19-0202 modification, or demand management measures. If no feasible improvements can be identified for an impacted facility, the impact will remain unavoidable. Caltrans For Caltrans jurisdiction study intersections, a project traffic impact occurs if: The project causes or worsens unacceptable Level of Service at a freeway ramp. 615 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 7 19-0202 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM Figure 3 identifies the lane geometry and intersection traffic controls for Existing conditions based on a field survey of the study area. Regional access to the project area is provided by State Route 57 approximately 0.2 miles east of the project site. The key north-south roadway providing local circulation is Sunkist Street. The key east-west roadway providing local circulation is Ball Road. Sunkist Street is a 4-lane undivided to divided roadway. Sunkist Street is classified as a Secondary Arterial (90 foot right-of-way) in the City of Anaheim General Plan. On-street parking is prohibited immediately adjacent to the project on both sides of the street. Dedicated Class II (marked/on-street) bicycle lanes are provided on Sunkist Street north of the project site at Whidby Lane and south of Ball Road at Omega Avenue. Ball Road is a 4- to 6-lane divided roadway. Ball Road is classified as a Primary Arterial (106 foot right-of-way) in the City of Anaheim General Plan. On-street parking is prohibited immediately adjacent to the project on both sides of the street. Dedicated Class II (marked/on-street) bicycle lanes are planned for Ball Road. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Existing pedestrian facilities in the project vicinity are shown on Figure 4. As shown on Figure 4, pedestrian sidewalks are currently provided along the roadways adjacent to the project site. BICYCLE ROUTES Class II (marked/on-street) bicycle lanes are planned for the project frontage along Ball Road and are provided on Sunkist Street north of the project site at Whidby Lane and south of Ball Road at Omega Avenue. The City’s Master Plan proposes to construct bicycle lanes on Sunkist Street between Omega Avenue and Whidby Lane. The City of Anaheim Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities map is depicted on Figure 5. TRANSIT FACILITIES Figure 6 shows the existing transit routes available in the project vicinity. As shown on Figure 6, OCTA Transit Route 46 runs along Ball Road, with bus stops located within 1/4-mile walking distance from the project site at Ball Road. TRUCK ROUTES Figure 7 shows the designated truck routes as identified in the City of Anaheim General Plan. GENERAL PLAN CONTEXT Figure 8 shows the City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element roadway classifications map. This figure shows the nature and extent of arterial and collector highways that are needed to adequately serve the ultimate development depicted by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The City of Anaheim standard roadway cross-sections are illustrated on Figure 9. EXISTING (2018) TRAFFIC VOLUMES Figure 10 shows the Existing average daily traffic volumes. The Existing average daily traffic volumes have been obtained from the 2019 Annual Traffic Volume Map from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). 716 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 8 19-0202 Existing peak hour traffic conditions are based upon AM peak period and PM peak period intersection turning movement counts obtained in December 2019 during typical weekday conditions when schools were in session. The AM peak period was counted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and the PM peak period was counted between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The actual peak hour within the peak period is the four consecutive 15 minute periods with the highest total volume when all movements are added together. Thus, the weekday PM peak hour at one intersection may be 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM if those four consecutive 15 minute periods have the highest combined volume. Intersection turning movement count worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the Existing AM peak hour and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes. EXISTING ICU/DELAY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE The intersection Levels of Service for Existing conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 1. Existing intersection Level of Service worksheets are provided in Appendix D. As shown in Table 1, the study intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing conditions. 8 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.654 B 0.705 C 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.650 B 0.721 C HCM6 [15.5] B [16.6] C 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.605 B 0.710 C HCM6 [12.9] B [14.0] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) HCM = Highway Capacity Manual TS = Traffic Signal Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. LOS = Level of Service Notes: Caltrans = California Department of Transportation V/C = Volume/Capacity Table 1 Existing Intersection Levels of Service Traffic Control2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Study Intersection Jurisdiction 1 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-02029 F i g u r e 3 E x i s t i n g L a n e G e o m e t r y a n d I n t e r s e c t i o n T r a f f i c C o n t r o l s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 5 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 STOP ST O P ST O P F F F F R T O Traffic SignalStop Sign#-Lane Divided Roadway#-Lane Undivided Roadway E x i s t i n g L a n e R i g h t T u r n O v e r l a p F r e e R i g h t T u r n L a n e Legend#D#U RTOFSTOP 4 D 4 D 4 U 6D4D 6 D 6 D 6 D 6 D S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 0 F i g u r e 4 E x i s t i n g P e d e s t r i a n F a c i l i t i e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 Sidewalk LegendCross WalkBus StopB B B 1 1 F i g u r e 5 C i t y o f A n a h e i m E x i s t i n g a n d P l a n n e d B i c y c l e F a c i l i t i e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 NSource: City of Anaheim S i t e 1 2 F i g u r e 6 C i t y o f A n a h e i m T r a n s i t R o u t e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 NSource: City of Anaheim S i t e 1 3 F i g u r e 7 C i t y o f A n a h e i m T r u c k R o u t e M a p B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 NSource: City of Anaheim S i t e 1 4 F i g u r e 8 C i t y o f A n a h e i m G e n e r a l P l a n C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 NSource: City of Anaheim S i t e 1 5 F i g u r e 9 C i t y o f A n a h e i m G e n e r a l P l a n R o a d w a y C r o s s - S e c t i o n s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 1 0 6 ' t o 1 4 8 ' 53' to 74'Sce n i c E x p r e s s w a y : 4 t o 6 L a n e s D i v i d e d 5 3 ' t o 7 4 ' 1 2 0 ' t o 1 6 6 ' 60' to 83'Res o r t S m a r t s t r e e t : 6 t o 8 L a n e s D i v i d e d 6 0 ' t o 8 3 ' 1 3 0 ' t o 1 4 4 ' 65' to 72'Stadi u m S m a r t s t r e e t : 6 t o 8 L a n e s D i v i d e d 6 5 ' t o 7 2 ' 1 2 0 ' 60' M a j o r A r t e r i a l : 6 L a n e s D i v i d e d 6 0 ' 1 0 6 ' 53'Pr i m a r y A r t e r i a l : 4 t o 6 L a n e s D i v i d e d 5 3 ' 1 0 6 ' t o 1 1 8 ' 5 3 ' t o 5 9 ' H i l l s i d e P r i m a r y A r t e r i a l : 4 t o 6 L a n e s D i v i d e d 9 0 ' 4 5 ' S e c o n d a r y A r t e r i a l : 4 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 5 3 ' t o 5 9 ' 4 5 ' 6 6 ' t o 7 8 ' 3 3 ' t o 3 9 ' H i l l s i d e S e c o n d a r y A r t e r i a l : 4 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 3 3 ' t o 3 9 ' 6 4 ' 3 2 ' C o l l e c t o r S t r e e t : 2 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 3 2 ' 4 2 ' t o 5 4 ' 2 1 ' t o 2 7 ' H i l l s i d e C o l l e c t o r S t r e e t : 2 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 2 1 ' t o 2 7 ' 9 0 ' 4 5 ' C o m p l e t e S t r e e t s C o l l e c t o r : 2 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 4 5 ' Source: City of Anaheim 1 6 F i g u r e 1 0 E x i s t i n g A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 0 1 4 . 0 41.0 5 2 . 0 3 7 . 0 2 4 7 . 9 2 4 9 . 9 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 1 7 F i g u r e 1 1 E x i s t i n g A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 534 1283 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 30174135 5325492021 5 3 1 1 8 7 4 7 3 9 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 7 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 8 5 1 1 6 0 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 8 5 1 1 6 0 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 485 828 1 0 9 1 7 5 6 7 7 6 1 4 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 314 494 1 1 6 2 4 5 0 5 9 6 3 0 7 1 8 F i g u r e 1 2 E x i s t i n g P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 1326 873 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 42459272 2734491512 4 9 1 1 3 4 4 2 2 9 6 1 4 5 9 6 1 8 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 6 7 1 2 3 8 7 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 6 7 1 2 3 8 7 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 407 820 1 2 1 3 4 5 0 1 5 8 0 2 3 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 613 299 1 1 1 1 5 0 9 1 2 0 9 4 3 0 1 9 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 20 19-0202 4. PROJECT TRIP FORECASTS This section describes how project trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment forecasts were developed. The forecast project volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Table 2 shows the project trip generation based on the Trip Generation Assessment for the Ball and Sunkist Gas Station and Car Wash (Fehr & Peers, July 31, 2019) and the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019). These sources combine trip generation forecasts based upon trip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017) and empirical data collected at three existing car wash locations within Orange County. As shown in Table 2, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 102 net new trips during the AM peak hour, 124 net new trips during the PM peak hour, and 1,507 net new daily trips. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Figure 13 and Figure 14 show the forecast outbound and inbound directional distribution patterns, respectively. Figure 15 and Figure 16 show the forecast outbound and inbound directional distribution patterns for pass-by trips, respectively. The project trip distribution patterns are based on review of existing volume data, surrounding land uses, designated truck routes, and the local and regional roadway facilities in the project vicinity. Based on the identified project trip generation and distributions, project average daily traffic volumes have been calculated and shown on Figure 17. AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes expected from the project are depicted on Figure 18 and Figure 19, respectively. 20 % In % Out Rate % In % Out Rate Commercial Retail ITE 820 TSF 62% 38% 0.94 48% 52% 3.81 37.75 Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market ITE 945 VFP 51% 49% 12.47 51% 49% 13.99 205.36 Automated Car Wash [a] Site [a] [a] [a] [a] [a] [a] [a] In Out Total In Out Total Existing Commercial Retail 20.200 TSF 12 7 19 37 40 77 763 - Pass-By Reduction (50% PM)4 -6 -4 -10 -19 -20 -39 -382 Subtotal - Existing 6 3 9 18 20 38 381 Proposed Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market 12 FP 77 73 150 86 82 168 2,465 - Pass-By Reduction (50%)3 -39 -36 -75 -43 -41 -84 -1,233 Automated Car Wash 1 Site 25 24 49 55 54 109 911 - Internal Capture (10%)4 -3 -2 -5 -6 -5 -11 -91 - Pass-By Reduction (20%)3 -4 -4 -8 -10 -10 -20 -164 Subtotal - Proposed 56 55 111 82 80 162 1,888 50 52 102 64 60 124 1,507 Notes: Table 2 Project Trip Generation Trip Generation Rates Land Use Source1 Units2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Rate Trips Generated 3) Pass-by reduction values from Los Angeles Department of Transportation Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, 2016. 4) 10% internal capture reduction assumed for compatible lane uses. Daily Net New Trips 1) Sources: ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017); ### = Land Use Code. [a] Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019). Data from three locations within Orange County. 2) TSF = Thousand Square Feet; VFP = Vehicle Fueling Positions Land Use Quantity Units 2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020221 F i g u r e 1 3 P r o j e c t O u t b o u n d T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 2 0 % 2 0 % 10%35% 5 0 % 3 0 % 8 0 % 3 5 % 2 5 % 5 % 2 0 % 1 0 % Percent From Project Legend10% 2 2 F i g u r e 1 4 P r o j e c t I n b o u n d T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 4 0 % 5 % 25% 3 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 2 0 % 2 0 % 6 0 % 2 0 % Percent To Project Legend10%10% 2 3 F i g u r e 1 5 P r o j e c t O u t b o u n d P a s s - B y T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 3 0 % 3 0 % 40% 4 5 % 2 5 % 7 0 % 2 0 % Percent From Project Legend10%10% 2 4 F i g u r e 1 6 P r o j e c t I n b o u n d P a s s - B y T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 3 0 % 20% 3 5 % 3 5 % 7 0 % Percent To Project Legend10% 5 % 5% 2 5 F i g u r e 1 7 P r o j e c t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 0 . 1 0 . 2 0.5 2 . 0 0 . 2 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 2 6 F i g u r e 1 8 P r o j e c t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 027 80 2 3 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 050 000 2 1 0 0 3 5 3 5 0 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 46 2 6 2 5 3 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 26 2 6 3 0 3 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 10 1 3 5 2 0 0 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 10 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 2 7 F i g u r e 1 9 P r o j e c t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 038 110 3 1 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 060 000 2 7 0 0 4 2 4 2 0 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 64 3 1 3 1 4 4 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 37 3 1 3 8 4 3 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 13 1 5 6 2 6 0 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 13 0 3 1 2 1 3 0 2 8 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 29 19-0202 5. FUTURE VOLUME FORECASTS This section describes how future volume forecasts for each analysis scenario were developed. Forecast study area volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section. CUMULATIVE TRIPS Ambient Growth Rate To account for ambient growth on roadways, existing traffic volumes were increased by a growth rate of two percent (2.0%) per year over two years for Opening Year (2021) conditions. This equates to a total growth factor of 1.04 for Opening Year conditions. The ambient growth rate was conservatively applied to all movements at the study intersections. Other Development To account for trips generated by future development, trips generated by pending or approved other development projects in the City of Anaheim and City of Orange were reviewed in consultation with City of Anaheim Public Works Department staff and added to the study area as appropriate. Table 3 shows the trip generation summary for other development projects. Figure 20 shows the other development location map. There were no pending/approved projects in the City of Orange within the project vicinity that would contribute an appreciable number of trips to the study intersections. The ambient growth accounts for any additional trips generated by other development projects located outside the project vicinity and not specifically listed in this report. Figure 21 shows the forecast average daily traffic volumes for the other development. Figure 22 and Figure 23 show the forecast AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes for trips generated by other developments. ANALYSIS SCENARIO VOLUME FORECASTS Existing Plus Project Existing Plus Project volume forecasts were derived by adding the project generated trips to Existing volumes. Existing Plus Project average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 24. Existing Plus Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 25 and Figure 26. Existing Plus Cumulative Existing Plus Cumulative volume forecasts were derived by adding the other development generated trips to Existing volumes. Existing Plus Cumulative average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 27. Existing Plus Cumulative AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 28 and Figure 29. Opening Year Without Project To develop Opening Year Without Project volume forecasts, Existing volumes were combined with ambient growth and trips generated by other developments. Opening Year Without Project average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 30. Opening Year Without Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown Figure 31 and Figure 32. 29 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 30 19-0202 Opening Year With Project Opening Year With Project volume forecasts were developed by adding project generated trips to the Opening Year Without Project forecast. Opening Year With Project average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 33. Opening Year With Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 34 and Figure 35. 30 Pr o j e c t A d d r e s s In O u t T o t a l I n O u t T o t a l Fa s t - F o o d R e s t a u r a n t w / D r i v e - T h r u ( E x i s t i n g ) 1 . 8 5 6 T S F 2 8 1 9 4 7 2 6 2 6 5 2 6 4 3 Au t o m a t e d C a r W a s h ( P r o p o s e d ) 1 S i t e 2 8 2 1 4 9 5 2 5 6 1 0 8 1 , 9 3 6 0 2 2 2 6 3 0 5 6 1 , 2 9 3 No t e s : An a h e i m E x p r e s s C a r W a s h (D E V 2 1 0 1 7 - 0 0 0 9 9 ) 3 82 1 S S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d To t a l (3 ) S o u r c e : 8 2 1 S o u t h S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d T r i p G e n e r a t i o n A n a l y s i s , K u n z m a n A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . , M a r c h 1 8 , 2 0 1 8 . (1 ) T S F = T h o u s a n d S q u a r e F e e t (2 ) T r i p g e n e r a t i o n f r o m I n s t i t u t e o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n E n g i n e e r s , T r i p G e n e r a t i o n M a n u a l , 1 0 t h E d i t i o n , 2 0 1 7 , a n d G r e e n f o r e s t C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s , RK Engineering Group, Inc., Ju l y 3 1 , 2 0 1 9 . Ta b l e 3 Ot h e r D e v e l o p m e n t T r i p G e n e r a t i o n Tr i p s G e n e r a t e d 2 AM P e a k H o u r P M P e a k H o u r La n d U s e Qu a n t i t y U n i t s 1 Daily Pr o j e c t N a m e ( C a s e N u m b e r ) Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-0202 31 City of AnaheimCity of Anaheim Legend MA I N S T BALL RD Site WAGNER AVE N ST A T E C O L L E G E B L V D SU N K I S T S T E A S T S T SOUTH ST ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Figure 20 Other Development Locaon Map Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-0202 RI O V I S T A S T BA T A V I A S T #Other Development ID in: 57 32 F i g u r e 2 1 O t h e r D e v e l o p m e n t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 0.1 0 . 1 0 . 1 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 3 3 F i g u r e 2 2 O t h e r D e v e l o p m e n t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 0 0 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 000 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 F i g u r e 2 3 O t h e r D e v e l o p m e n t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 0 0 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 000 000 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 3 3 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 3 3 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 2 1 3 0 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 5 F i g u r e 2 4 E x i s t i n g P l u s P r o j e c t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 1 1 4 . 2 41.5 5 4 . 0 3 7 . 2 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 3 6 F i g u r e 2 5 E x i s t i n g P l u s P r o j e c t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 53427 81283 2 3 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 30179135 5325492021 7 4 1 1 8 7 4 7 4 2 5 1 0 3 7 2 0 7 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 46 1 8 7 7 1 6 2 7 3 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 26 1 8 7 7 1 6 3 2 3 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 485 838 1 1 0 4 7 6 1 7 9 6 1 4 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 324 494 1 1 6 5 4 6 0 6 0 6 3 0 7 3 7 F i g u r e 2 6 E x i s t i n g P l u s P r o j e c t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 132638 11873 3 1 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 42465272 2734491512 7 6 1 1 3 4 4 2 3 3 8 1 5 0 1 6 1 8 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 64 1 7 0 2 2 4 1 8 4 4 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 37 1 7 0 2 2 4 2 5 4 3 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 407 833 1 2 2 8 4 5 6 1 6 0 6 2 3 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 626 299 1 1 1 4 5 2 1 1 2 2 2 4 3 0 3 8 F i g u r e 2 7 E x i s t i n g P l u s C u m u l a t i v e A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 0 1 4 . 0 41.1 5 2 . 1 3 7 . 1 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 3 9 F i g u r e 2 8 E x i s t i n g P l u s C u m u l a t i v e A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 534 1283 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 30174135 5325492021 5 3 1 1 8 7 4 7 3 9 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 7 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 8 5 1 1 6 0 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 8 5 1 1 6 0 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 485 828 1 0 9 1 7 5 6 7 7 6 1 4 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 314 494 1 1 6 2 4 5 0 5 9 6 3 0 7 4 0 F i g u r e 2 9 E x i s t i n g P l u s C u m u l a t i v e P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 1326 873 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 42459272 2734491512 4 9 1 1 3 7 4 2 2 9 6 1 4 6 2 6 1 8 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 6 7 4 2 3 9 0 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 6 7 4 2 3 9 0 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 407 820 1 2 1 5 4 5 1 1 5 8 3 2 3 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 614 299 1 1 1 3 5 0 9 1 2 1 1 4 3 0 4 1 F i g u r e 3 0 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h o u t P r o j e c t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 3 1 4 . 6 42.8 5 4 . 2 3 8 . 6 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 4 2 F i g u r e 3 1 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h o u t P r o j e c t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 555 1334 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 31181140 5535712101 5 9 1 2 3 4 4 9 4 0 6 1 0 4 2 2 1 5 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 9 2 5 1 6 6 6 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 9 2 5 1 6 6 6 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 504 861 1 1 3 5 7 8 6 8 0 7 1 5 2 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 327 514 1 2 0 8 4 6 8 6 2 0 3 1 9 4 3 F i g u r e 3 2 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h o u t P r o j e c t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 1379 908 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 44477283 2844671572 5 9 1 1 8 2 4 4 3 0 8 1 5 2 0 6 4 3 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 7 4 1 2 4 8 5 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 7 4 1 2 4 8 5 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 423 853 1 2 6 4 4 6 9 1 6 4 6 2 4 5 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 639 311 1 1 5 7 5 2 9 1 2 5 9 4 4 7 4 4 F i g u r e 3 3 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h P r o j e c t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 4 1 4 . 8 43.3 5 6 . 2 3 8 . 8 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 4 5 F i g u r e 3 4 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h P r o j e c t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 55527 81334 2 3 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 31186140 5535712101 8 0 1 2 3 4 4 9 4 4 1 1 0 7 7 2 1 5 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 46 1 9 5 1 1 6 9 1 3 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 26 1 9 5 1 1 6 9 6 3 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 504 871 1 1 4 8 7 9 1 8 2 7 1 5 2 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 337 514 1 2 1 1 4 7 8 6 3 0 3 1 9 4 6 F i g u r e 3 5 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h P r o j e c t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 137938 11908 3 1 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 44483283 2844671572 8 6 1 1 8 2 4 4 3 5 0 1 5 6 2 6 4 3 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 64 1 7 7 2 2 5 1 6 4 4 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 37 1 7 7 2 2 5 2 3 4 3 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 423 866 1 2 7 9 4 7 5 1 6 7 2 2 4 5 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 652 311 1 1 6 0 5 4 1 1 2 7 2 4 4 7 4 7 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 48 19-0202 6. FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Detailed intersection Level of Service calculation worksheets for each of the following analysis scenarios are provided in Appendix D. EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Intersection Levels of Service The intersection Levels of Service for Existing Plus Project conditions are shown in Table 4. As shown in Table 4, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour: Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although these intersections are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour, additional improvements are not recommended for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience any delay. These southbound right turning vehicles can queue within the project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right turning vehicles during the PM peak hour is 47.37 feet for the project west driveway and 23.17 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. Operational Impact Evaluation Table 5 evaluates the project impact at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions. As shown in Table 5, the proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions. EXISTING PLUS CUMULATIVE Intersection Levels of Service The intersection Levels of Service for Existing Plus Cumulative conditions are shown in Table 6. As shown in Table 6, the study intersections are forecast to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Cumulative conditions. 48 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 49 19-0202 OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT Intersection Levels of Service The intersection Levels of Service for Opening Year Without Project conditions are shown in Table 7. As shown in Table 7, the study intersections are forecast to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year Without Project conditions. OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT Intersection Levels of Service The intersection Levels of Service for Opening Year With Project conditions are shown in Table 8. As shown in Table 8, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year With Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour): Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS F) Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although these intersections are forecast to operate at Level of Service E/F during the PM peak hour, additional improvements are not recommended for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience any delay. These southbound right turning vehicles can queue within the project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right turning vehicles during the PM peak hour is 52.25 feet for the project west driveway and 25.34 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. Operational Impact Evaluation Table 9 evaluates the project impact at the study intersections for Opening Year With Project conditions. As shown in Table 9, the proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for Opening Year With Project conditions. 49 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 1. Sunkist St at Project Dwy Anaheim CSS [10.2] B [15.0] B 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.666 B 0.723 C 3. Project West Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [20.6] C [45.7] E 4. Project East Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [19.5] C [36.9] E 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.656 B 0.730 C HCM6 [15.6] B [16.9] C 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.611 B 0.725 C HCM6 [12.9] B [14.3] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Caltrans = California Department of Transportation PM Peak Hour Table 4 Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service Jurisdiction1Study Intersection Traffic Control2 AM Peak Hour Notes: CSS = Cross Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal V/C = Volume/Capacity Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). LOS = Level of Service HCM = Highway Capacity Manual Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020250 ID Study Intersection V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd 0.654 B 0.666 B +0.012 No 0.705 C 0.723 C +0.018 No 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd 0.650 B 0.656 B +0.006 No 0.721 C 0.730 C +0.009 No 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd 0.605 B 0.611 B +0.006 No 0.710 C 0.725 C +0.015 No Notes: Signalized Intersections AM Peak Hour Table 5 Existing Plus Project Significant Impact Evaluation PM Peak Hour Without Project With Project Change Significant Impact? Without Project With Project (1) V/C = Volume/Capacity (2) LOS = Level of Service Change Significant Impact? Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020251 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.654 B 0.705 C 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.650 B 0.721 C HCM6 [15.5] B [16.6] B 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.605 B 0.711 C HCM6 [12.9] B [14.0] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Table 6 Existing Plus Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service PM Peak Hour Caltrans = California Department of Transportation Study Intersection Jurisdiction 1 Traffic Control2 AM Peak Hour Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). LOS = Level of Service HCM = Highway Capacity Manual Notes: CSS = Cross Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal V/C = Volume/Capacity Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020252 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.678 B 0.731 C 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.674 B 0.748 C HCM6 [16.0] B [17.5] B 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.628 B 0.737 C HCM6 [13.4] B [15.0] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Caltrans = California Department of Transportation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Notes: Table 7 Opening Year Without Project Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection Jurisdiction 1 Traffic Control2 CSS = Cross Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal V/C = Volume/Capacity Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). LOS = Level of Service HCM = Highway Capacity Manual Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020253 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 1. Sunkist St at Project Dwy Anaheim CSS [10.3] B [15.4] C 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.690 B 0.749 C 3. Project West Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [21.6] C [51.2] F 4. Project East Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [20.3] C [40.3] E 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.680 B 0.757 C HCM6 [16.1] B [17.8] B 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.634 B 0.752 C HCM6 [13.4] B [15.8] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Table 8 Opening Year With Project Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection Jurisdiction 1 Traffic Control2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour HCM = Highway Capacity Manual Notes: Caltrans = California Department of Transportation CSS = Cross Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal V/C = Volume/Capacity Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). LOS = Level of Service Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020254 ID Study Intersection V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd 0.678 B 0.690 B +0.012 No 0.731 C 0.749 C +0.018 No 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd 0.674 B 0.680 B +0.006 No 0.748 C 0.757 C +0.009 No 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd 0.628 B 0.634 B +0.006 No 0.737 C 0.752 C +0.015 No Notes: (1) V/C = Volume/Capacity Table 9 Opening Year With Project Significant Impact Evaluation Signalized Intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Without Project With Project Change Significant Impact? Without Project (2) LOS = Level of Service With Project Change Significant Impact? Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020255 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 56 19-0202 7. ON-SITE PARKING AND QUEUING ANALYSIS MUNICIPAL CODE OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS The City of Anaheim Municipal Code Table 42-A lists non-residential off-street parking requirements. Automotive-Service Stations (in conjunction with accessory retail/convenience store) require 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of the convenience store. Up to 50 percent of the pump islands may be counted as parking stalls. The convenience store is 2,945 square feet with six pump islands (12 vehicle fueling positions). The convenience store requires approximately 12 parking spaces with the six pump islands credited as three parking spaces. Thus, the convenience store component of the proposed project requires nine (9) marked parking spaces. Automotive-Washing requires a parking demand study per paragraph 18.42.040.010.0108. CAR WASH PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS The 387 North Tustin Street Drive-Through Queuing and Parking Study (Ganddini Group, Inc., June 11, 2019), contains empirical parking data for three existing car wash facilities. Field observations of parking demand were conducted at the following three existing car wash facility locations: 1. Rapids Express Carwash – 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange CA; 2. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash – 1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana, CA; and 3. Speedie Clean Express Car Wash – 2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana, CA. The number of parked vehicles were observed in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM during a typical weekday (Tuesday, July 10, 2018) and a typical Saturday (July 14, 2018). The observations were conducted using field surveys with technicians on-site. Table 10 and Table 11 exhibit the summaries of the parking demand observations for these three locations from the aforementioned parking study. As shown in Table 10, the Tuesday maximum peak parking demand observed was 20 parked vehicles at the Rapids Express site, 13 parked vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and 17 parked vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average parking demand for the Tuesday counts for the three survey sites is 14.3 parked vehicles throughout various times of the day. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile parking demand is 19.1 parked vehicles during the AM peak period. As shown in Table 11, the Saturday maximum peak parking demand observed was 18 parked vehicles at the Rapids Express site, 21 parked vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and 21 parked vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average parking demand for the Saturday counts for the three survey sites is 18.0 parked vehicles throughout various times during the mid-day peak period. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile parking demand is 20.4 parked vehicles during the AM peak period. The parking count data combined vehicles parked in vacuum station stalls and regular parking stalls. Field observations noted that some vehicles occupying the vacuum station stalls are not vacuuming but are either drying the vehicles or utilizing other amenities in the facility. Therefore, the overall parking demand includes all users of the car wash facility. Assuming the proposed car wash would experience parking demand similar to the three observed sites, the typical peak parking demand is estimated to be approximately 21 vehicles during peak periods based on the highest 85th-percentile parking demand for all users of the car wash facility. 56 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 57 19-0202 PARKING DEMAND AND REQUIREMENTS The gasoline/service station with convenience market component of the proposed project requires nine (9) parking spaces based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code off-street parking requirements. The project proposes to provide nine (9) parking spaces. Thus, sufficient off-street parking is provided for the gasoline/service station with convenience market component of the proposed project. The car wash component of the proposed project requires 21 parking spaces to meet maximum demand observed at three similar car wash facilities. The proposed development provides 24 parking spaces. Thus, sufficient off-street parking is provided for the car wash component of the proposed project. QUEUING ANALYSIS This analysis estimates the drive through car wash lane queuing demand and parking demand for the proposed project based on observations at six existing similar car wash facilities. The City of Anaheim provided data from the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, July 31, 2019). The three existing car wash facilities surveyed in the Greenforest Car Wash study are located at: 1. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash – 1807 Main Street, Santa Ana, CA; 2. Zaroo Express Car Wash – 1205 West 17th Street, Santa Ana, CA; and 3. Santa Ana Express Car Wash – 202 East First Street, Santa Ana, CA. The Greenforest Car Wash study compiled queuing surveys during the peak traffic generating hour on one weekday and one Saturday at the above locations. The 95th-percentile queue was calculated for each site and represents the maximum amount of vehicles stacked behind the car wash tunnel 95 percent of the time or less. The average vehicle length, including headway, was considered 20 feet for queuing purposes. The 387 North Tustin Street Drive-Through Queuing and Parking Study (Ganddini Group, Inc., June 11, 2019), contains empirical queuing data for three existing car wash facilities. Field observations of drive through car wash lane queues were conducted at the following three existing car wash facility locations: 4. Rapids Express Carwash – 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange CA; 5. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash – 1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana, CA; and 6. Speedie Clean Express Car Wash – 2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana, CA. The drive-through vehicular queues were observed in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM during a typical weekday (Tuesday, July 10, 2018) and a typical Saturday (July 14, 2018). The observations were conducted using field surveys with technicians on-site. The 85th-percentile queue was calculated for each site and represents the maximum amount of vehicles stacked behind the car wash tunnel 85 percent of the time or less. Table 10 and Table 11 exhibit the summaries of the queuing length observations for these three locations from the aforementioned parking study. Table 12 shows the results of the queuing analysis for all six locations. As shown on Table 12, the average peak hour 95th/85th percentile queue is four (4) vehicles on a weekday and nine (9) vehicles on a Saturday. A queue of nine (9) vehicles would require 180 feet (9 vehicles x 20 feet per vehicle) of queue length. The site plan shows stacking distance for 33 vehicles spaced 20 feet apart from the car wash tunnel through the loading area between the car wash and northern property boundary, ending at the beginning of the drive-thru lane. Therefore, adequate queuing capacity is anticipated to be provided for the project site. Appendix E includes supporting data provided by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department from the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, July 31, 2019) and the 387 North Tustin Street Drive-Through Queuing and Parking Study (Ganddini Group, Inc., June 11, 2019). 57 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 58 19-0202 VACUUM PARKING STALLS The vacuum parking stalls for the car wash are located on the south side of the car wash tunnel. A 28.58 foot east-west drive aisle extends from the convenience market to the drive-thru lane for the car wash between the vacuum stalls and the south property boundary on Ball Road. The vacuum parking stalls are situated perpendicular to this drive aisle. Since the average peak hour 95th/85th percentile queue is nine (9) vehicles on a Saturday and the car wash provides queuing for 33 vehicles from the car wash tunnel to the beginning of the drive-thru, queuing beyond the drive-thru entrance along the southern property boundary adjacent to Ball Road is not expected to occur. Therefore, the position of the vacuum parking stalls perpendicular to this drive aisle and the car wash tunnel appears to be sufficient, and redesign (such as angled parking of these vacuum parking stalls) does not appear to be necessary. 58 Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 230112 2 31.02.01.72.7 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 332128 3 82.34.02.76.5 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 051345 4 51.74.33.15.0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 032325 2 51.33.72.04.4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 141723 2 71.34.71.76.1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 090537 3 91.07.02.18.4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 1506411 4111.77.33.19.5 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 1 13 0 2 5 11 5 13 2.0 8.7 3.8 12.4 9:00 AM - 9:15 AM 3 12 1 4 8 10 8 12 4.0 8.7 6.5 11.4 9:15 AM - 9:30 AM 2 20 0 6 4 17 4 20 *2.0 14.3 *3.4 19.1 * 9:30 AM - 9:45 AM 0 11 1 3 4 11 4 11 1.7 8.3 3.1 11.0 9:45 AM - 10:00 AM 1 15 1539 3151.79.72.413.2 10:00 AM - 10:15 AM 0 19 0 4 4 11 4 19 1.3 11.3 2.8 16.6 10:15 AM - 10:30 AM 0 14 0 1 7 13 7 14 2.3 9.3 4.9 13.7 10:30 AM - 10:45 AM 1 15 1 5 5 14 5 15 2.3 11.3 3.8 14.7 10:45 AM - 11:00 AM 1 12 1998 9123.79.76.611.1 11:00 AM - 11:15 AM 1 11 0959 5112.09.73.810.4 11:15 AM - 11:30 AM 2 12 2877 7123.79.05.510.8 11:30 AM - 11:45 AM 0 14 1 4 5 13 5 14 2.0 10.3 3.8 13.7 11:45 AM - 12:00 PM 1 14 2 5 6 12 6 14 3.0 10.3 4.8 13.4 12:00 PM - 12:15 PM 1 11 1 7 8 14 8 14 3.3 10.7 5.9 13.1 12:15 PM - 12:30 PM 0 12 3 8 4 13 4 13 2.3 11.0 3.7 12.7 12:30 PM - 12:45 PM 2 10 0 8 4 13 4 13 2.0 10.3 3.4 12.1 12:45 PM - 1:00 PM 0 11 1878 7112.79.05.210.1 1:00 PM - 1:15 PM 2 10 3948 4103.09.03.79.7 1:15 PM - 1:30 PM 1 12 0 9 5 11 5 12 2.0 10.7 3.8 11.7 1:30 PM - 1:45 PM 5 14 1 8 1 15 5 15 2.3 12.3 3.8 14.7 1:45 PM - 2:00 PM 4 14 0 7 6 12 6 14 3.3 11.0 5.4 13.4 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM 6 17 1 7 1 13 6 17 2.7 12.3 4.5 15.8 2:15 PM - 2:30 PM 3 15 1 8 4 12 4 15 2.7 11.7 3.7 14.1 2:30 PM - 2:45 PM 5 16 0 10 1 17 5 17 2.0 14.3 *3.8 16.7 2:45 PM - 3:00 PM 7 12 0 11 1 14 7 14 2.7 12.3 5.2 13.4 3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 3 16 0926 3161.710.3 2.7 13.9 3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 4 15 1 8 3 14 4 15 2.7 12.3 3.7 14.7 3:30 PM - 3:45 PM 2 19 1 7 1 17 2 19 1.3 14.3 *1.7 18.4 3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 2 15 0 7 5 13 5 15 2.3 11.7 4.1 14.4 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 3 15 0177 7153.37.75.812.6 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 6 12 2 4 4 13 6 13 4.0 9.7 5.4 12.7 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 5 13 1 4 1 11 5 13 2.3 9.3 3.8 12.4 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 4 14 0 5 3 13 4 14 2.3 10.7 3.7 13.7 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 6903310 6103.07.35.19.7 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 3 16 2428 3162.39.32.713.6 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 6 14 0748 6143.39.75.412.2 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 3 15 3718 3152.310.0 3.0 12.9 6:00 PM - 6:15 PM 5 17 0 13 2 13 5 17 2.3 14.3 *4.1 15.8 6:15 PM - 6:30 PM 4909012 4121.310.0 2.8 11.1 6:30 PM - 6:45 PM 5 11 1959 5113.79.75.010.4 6:45 PM - 7:00 PM 3 14 1 11 2 13 3 14 2.0 12.7 2.7 13.7 7:00 PM - 7:15 PM 1 17 0 11 0 8 1 17 0.3 12.0 0.7 15.2 7:15 PM - 7:30 PM 4 12 0 12 1 9 4 12 1.7 11.0 3.1 12.0 7:30 PM - 7:45 PM 1 14 0 12 1 12 1 14 0.7 12.7 1.0 13.4 7:45 PM - 8:00 PM 18 4 1 11 2 9 18 *11 7.0 *8.0 13.2 *10.4 18 20 3 13 9 17 2.8 12.3 0.8 6.6 3.6 10.6 5.0 16.0 2.0 9.4 6.0 13.4 Site Average Site 85th Percentile Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking Site Peak Table 10 Weekday Vehicle Queue and Parking Demand Survey (July 10, 2018) Time Period Rapids Express Scrub Bot Express Speedie Clean Express Hourly Peak Hourly Average Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020259 Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 270635 3 71.76.02.76.7 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 5 11 1 10 2 13 5 13 2.7 11.3 4.1 12.4 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 3 12 0 12 3 11 3 12 2.0 11.7 3.0 12.0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 2 11 0 10 1 12 2 12 1.0 11.0 1.7 11.7 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 5 15 2 8 0 10 5 15 2.3 11.0 4.1 13.5 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 4 14 0 10 2 14 4 14 2.0 12.7 3.4 14.0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 6 15 0 10 6 15 6 15 4.0 13.3 6.0 15.0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 3 17 0 6 2 18 3 18 1.7 13.7 2.7 17.7 9:00 AM - 9:15 AM 6 18 1 10 1 13 6 18 2.7 13.7 4.5 16.5 9:15 AM - 9:30 AM 4 16 1 11 3 14 4 16 2.7 13.7 3.7 15.4 9:30 AM - 9:45 AM 4 17 1 10 0 14 4 17 1.7 13.7 3.1 16.1 9:45 AM - 10:00 AM 6 16 3 14 4 15 6 16 4.3 15.0 5.4 15.7 10:00 AM - 10:15 AM 5 14 3 21 3 19 5 21 *3.7 18.0 *4.4 20.4 * 10:15 AM - 10:30 AM 4 16 0 11 1 16 4 16 1.7 14.3 3.1 16.0 10:30 AM - 10:45 AM 5 18 1 12 4 19 5 19 3.3 16.3 4.7 18.7 10:45 AM - 11:00 AM 9 17 2 15 2 15 9 17 4.3 15.7 6.9 16.4 11:00 AM - 11:15 AM 9 18 4 15 4 16 9 18 5.7 16.3 7.5 17.4 11:15 AM - 11:30 AM 9 14 3 15 4 17 9 17 5.3 15.3 7.5 16.4 11:30 AM - 11:45 AM 11 15 5 18 7 21 11 21 *7.7 18.0 *9.8 20.1 11:45 AM - 12:00 PM 9 16 3 19 6 14 9 19 6.0 16.3 8.1 18.1 12:00 PM - 12:15 PM 14 17 1 20 4 15 14 20 6.3 17.3 11.0 19.1 12:15 PM - 12:30 PM 10 15 0 18 5 15 10 18 5.0 16.0 8.5 17.1 12:30 PM - 12:45 PM 6 16 1 9 6 21 6 21 *4.3 15.3 6.0 19.5 12:45 PM - 1:00 PM 15 15 2 12 5 18 15 18 7.3 15.0 12.0 17.1 1:00 PM - 1:15 PM 14 18 5 13 6 19 14 19 8.3 16.7 11.6 18.7 1:15 PM - 1:30 PM 14 18 4 15 7 20 14 20 8.3 17.7 11.9 19.4 1:30 PM - 1:45 PM 22 4 3 16 8 21 22 *21 *11.0 *13.7 17.8 *19.5 1:45 PM - 2:00 PM 21 4 0 15 4 16 21 16 8.3 11.7 15.9 15.7 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM 19 7 2 13 0 20 19 20 7.0 13.3 13.9 17.9 2:15 PM - 2:30 PM 14 3 0 15 2 15 14 15 5.3 11.0 10.4 15.0 2:30 PM - 2:45 PM 17 5 0 14 4 13 17 14 7.0 10.7 13.1 13.7 2:45 PM - 3:00 PM 18 4 2 12 1 15 18 15 7.0 10.3 13.2 14.1 3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 18 2 1 14 5 21 18 21 *8.0 12.3 14.1 18.9 3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 20 5 0 13 3 19 20 19 7.7 12.3 14.9 17.2 3:30 PM - 3:45 PM 17 3 0 13 3 16 17 16 6.7 10.7 12.8 15.1 3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 22 6 3 12 7 17 22 *17 10.7 11.7 17.5 15.5 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 19 2 2 12 0 14 19 14 7.0 9.3 13.9 13.4 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 17 0 4 13 5 20 17 20 8.7 11.0 13.4 17.9 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 18 1 1 16 3 15 18 16 7.3 10.7 13.5 15.7 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 16 3 1 16 5 9 16 16 7.3 9.3 12.7 13.9 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 13 2 2 12 2 11 13 12 5.7 8.3 9.7 11.7 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 13 1 1 15 1 11 13 15 5.0 9.0 9.4 13.8 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 12 0 0 13 1 15 12 15 4.3 9.3 8.7 14.4 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 12 2 2 14 5 16 12 16 6.3 10.7 9.9 15.4 6:00 PM - 6:15 PM 10 0 3 13 3 19 10 19 5.3 10.7 7.9 17.2 6:15 PM - 6:30 PM 9 0 2 14 3 17 9 17 4.7 10.3 7.2 16.1 6:30 PM - 6:45 PM 9 0 3 13 2 11 9 13 4.7 8.0 7.2 12.4 6:45 PM - 7:00 PM 8 0 0 10 1 9 8 10 3.0 6.3 5.9 9.7 7:00 PM - 7:15 PM 7 0 0 12 1 7 7 12 2.7 6.3 5.2 10.5 7:15 PM - 7:30 PM 8008210 8103.36.06.29.4 7:30 PM - 7:45 PM 6018411 6113.76.35.410.1 7:45 PM - 8:00 PM 6 0 0 13 2 12 6 13 2.7 8.3 4.8 12.7 22 18 5 21 8 21 10.7 8.7 1.5 12.9 3.2 15.0 18.0 17.0 3.0 15.4 5.4 19.0 Table 11 Saturday Vehicle Queue and Parking Demand Survey (July 14, 2018) Time Period Rapids Express Scrub Bot Express Speedie Clean Express Hourly Peak Hourly Average Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking Site Peak Site Average Site 85th Percentile Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020260 Peak Hour Queue (85th/95th Percentile, in Vehicles) 4 Peak Hour Queue (85th/95th Percentile, in Vehicles) 9 Notes: Table 12 Drive Through Car Wash Lane Queuing Analysis Scrub Bot Express Car Wash1 (1807 Main Street, Santa Ana)3 Observed Car Wash Location Weekday 2(1205 West 17th Street, Santa Ana) Santa Ana Express Car Wash1 5(202 East First Street, Santa Ana) Zaroo Express Car Wash1 Rapids Express Car Wash2 5(2045 North Tustin Street, Orange) Scrub Bot Express Car Wash2 2(1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana) Speedie Clean Express Car Wash2 6(2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana) Average Peak Queue (1) Source: Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis, RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash2 3(1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana) Speedie Clean Express Car Wash2 6(2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana) Average Peak Queue (2) Source: 387 North Tustin Street Drive-Through Queuing and Parking Study, Ganddini Group, Inc., June 11, 2019. Peak hour queue is 85th percentile. Saturday Observed Car Wash Location Scrub Bot Express Car Wash1 5(1807 Main Street, Santa Ana) Zaroo Express Car Wash1 6(1205 West 17th Street, Santa Ana) Santa Ana Express Car Wash1 14(202 East First Street, Santa Ana) Rapids Express Car Wash2 18(2045 North Tustin Street, Orange) Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020261 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 62 19-0202 8. VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) BACKGROUND The California Natural Resources Agency adopted revised CEQA Guidelines on December 28, 2018. Among the changes to the guidelines was the removal of vehicle delay and Level of Service (LOS) from consideration for transportation impacts under CEQA. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts were to be evaluated based on a project’s effect on vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Lead agencies were allowed to continue using their current impact criteria until June 30, 2020, or to opt into the revised transportation guidelines. In late 2019, State courts stated that under section 21099, subdivision (b)(2), existing law is that “automobile delay, as described solely by level of service or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment” under CEQA, except for roadway capacity projects. While the Proposed Project does not create a significant impact through LOS or delay, for the purposes of this recent court decision, the Proposed Project was also screened for VMT analysis. On June 23, 2020, the City of Anaheim City Council adopted the VMT Thresholds of Significance for purpose of analyzing transportation impacts and also approved the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Analysis. Based on the City Guidelines, the proposed project type is one of the screening thresholds that could be used for determining if a VMT analysis is required. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of access to services by local residents and has the effect of reducing vehicle miles traveled. Specifically in the City’s guidelines, the following uses are presumed to have a less than significant impact due to their local serving nature: Local serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet, including: o Automobile Washing o Automotive- Service Stations o Convenience Stores VMT ASSESSMENT AND SCREENING The Proposed Project consists solely of these uses. Also, there is the propensity for patrons to use more than one of these facilities on the same trip, also referred to as internal capture. Therefore, the Project could be screened from a VMT analysis, and would be considered a less than significant impact on VMT, per the City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis. Please note that the City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis does not preclude the requirements for a LOS analysis, as required by the City’s General Plan. The VMT analysis is used to determine if there is a significant impact under CEQA. However, the LOS analysis is also required to determine if the project conforms with the requirements of the Anaheim General Plan. 62 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 63 19-0202 9. CONCLUSIONS MITIGATION MEASURES No off-site mitigation measure improvements were identified since the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for the scenarios analyzed. ON-SITE PARKING AND QUEUING Sufficient off-street parking is provided for both the gasoline station/convenience market and the car wash components of the proposed project. Adequate drive through car wash lane queuing capacity is anticipated to be provided for the project site. The position of the vacuum parking stalls perpendicular to the east-west drive aisle and the car wash tunnel appears to be sufficient, and redesign (such as angled parking of these vacuum parking stalls) does not appear to be necessary. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS All roadway design, traffic signing and striping, and traffic control improvements relating to the proposed project should be constructed in accordance with applicable engineering standards and to the satisfaction of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. Site-adjacent roadways should be repaired at their ultimate half-section width, including landscaping and parkway improvements in conjunction with development, or as otherwise required by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. On-site traffic signing and striping plans should be submitted for City of Anaheim approval in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans should demonstrate that sight distance standards are met in accordance with applicable City of Anaheim/California Department of Transportation sight distance standards. As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Anaheim should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. 63 Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19‐0202 APPENDICES Appendix A Glossary Appendix B Scoping Agreement Appendix C Volume Count Worksheets Appendix D Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E Parking and Queuing Data Apx - 1 APPENDIX A GLOSSARY Apx - 2 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ACRONYMS AC Acres ADT Average Daily Traffic Caltrans California Department of Transportation DU Dwelling Unit ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS Level of Service TSF Thousand Square Feet V/C Volume/Capacity VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The average 24‐hour volume for a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. For example, Annual Average Daily Traffic is the total volume during a year divided by 365 days. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A point of constriction along a roadway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CONTROL DELAY: The component of delay, typically expressed in seconds per vehicle, resulting from the type of traffic control at an intersection. Control delay is measured by comparison with the uncontrolled condition; it includes delay incurred by slowing down, stopping/waiting, and speeding up. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum sight distance required by the driver of a vehicle to cross or enter the lanes of the major roadway without requiring approaching traffic travelling at a given speed to radically alter their speed or trajectory. Corner sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the pavement to an object height of 36 inches above the pavement in the center of the nearest approach lane. CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for a traffic signal to complete one full cycle of indications. CUL‐DE‐SAC: A local street open at one end only and with special provisions for turning around. Apx - 3 DAILY CAPACITY: A theoretical value representing the daily traffic volume that will typically result in a peak hour volume equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic‐actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI‐MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. Apx - 4 PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENT (PCE): A metric used to assess the impact of larger vehicles, such as trucks, recreational vehicles, and buses, by converting the traffic volume of larger vehicles to an equivalent number of passenger cars. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles. PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. QUEUE: The number of vehicles waiting at a service area such as a traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate. QUEUE LENGTH: The length of vehicle queue, typically expressed in feet, waiting at a service area such as a traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate. SCREEN‐LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SHARED/RECIPROCAL PARKING AGREEMENT: A written binding document executed between property owners to provide a designated number of off‐street parking stalls within a designated area to be available for specified businesses or land uses. SIGHT DISTANCE: The continuous length of roadway visible to a driver or roadway user. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STACKING DISTANCE: The length of area available behind a service area, such as a traffic signal or gate, for vehicle queueing to occur. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through an intersection. STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum distance required by the driver of a vehicle on the major roadway travelling at a given speed to bring the vehicle to a stop after an object on the road becomes visible. Stopping sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the pavement to an object height of 6 inches above the pavement. TRAFFIC‐ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP‐END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination (i.e., each trip has two trip‐ends). A trip‐end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. Apx - 5 TURNING RADIUS: The circular arc formed by the smallest turning path radius of the front outside tire of a vehicle, such as that performed by a U‐turn maneuver. This is based on the length and width of the wheel base as well as the steering mechanism of the vehicle. UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles. Apx - 6 APPENDIX B SCOPING AGREEMENT Apx - 7 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714) 795‐3100 | www.ganddini.com MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TO: David Kennedy | CITY OF ANAHEIM FROM: Bryan Crawford | GANDDINI GROUP, INC. Giancarlo Ganddini | GANDDINI GROUP, INC. DATE: December 13, 2019 SUBJECT: Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope 19‐0202 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this scoping document is to outline the proposed traffic analysis parameters and assumptions for the Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash project for review/concurrence by City of Anaheim staff. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1 shows the project location map. The project site is located at the northeast corner of Sunkist Street and Ball Road in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project involves demolishing the existing 20,200 square feet of commercial retail and replacing it with a 12 fueling position gasoline/service station with convenience market and an automated car wash. The site plan is illustrated on Figure 2. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION Table 1 shows the project trip generation based on the Trip Generation Assessment for the Ball and Sunkist Gas Station and Car Wash, prepared by Fehr & Peers, July 31, 2019 and the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019. Trip generation is shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 102 additional trips during the morning peak hour, 124 additional trips during the evening peak hour, and 1,507 additional daily trips. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the forecast directional distribution patterns of project‐generated trips for outbound and inbound vehicles. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the forecast directional distribution patterns of pass‐by trips for outbound and inbound vehicles. STUDY AREA The study area is proposed to consist of the following six (6) study intersections: Apx - 8 David Kennedy | CITY OF ANAHEIM Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope December 13, 2019 Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope 2 19‐0202 Study Intersections 1. Sunkist Street (NS) at Project Driveway (EW) 2. Sunkist Street (NS) at Ball Road (EW) 3. Project West Driveway (NS) at Ball Road (EW) 4. Project East Driveway (NS) at Ball Road (EW) 5. SR‐57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Road (EW) 6. SR‐57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Road (EW) ANALYSIS SCENARIOS The traffic study shall evaluate the following analysis scenarios for typical weekday morning and evening peak hour conditions: Existing Existing Plus Project Existing Plus Cumulative Opening Year Without Project Opening Year With Project TRAFFIC COUNTS New intersection turning movement counts will collected at the study intersections during the morning peak period (7:00 AM – 9:00 AM) and evening peak period (4:00 PM – 6:00 PM) on a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) while local schools are in session. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The signalized study intersections shall by analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology in accordance with the parameters and impact thresholds prescribed in the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Studies Criteria. The unsignalized study intersections shall be analyzed using the intersection delay methodology and recommended default factors prescribed in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition). Intersections within the jurisdiction of Caltrans will be analyzed utilizing both the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology and the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition). Performance Standards The City of Anaheim has established Level of Service D as the minimum acceptable Level of Service during peak hour conditions. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) endeavors to maintain a target Level of Service at the transition between Level of Service C and D (maximum 35 seconds of control delay). If an existing facility, or study area intersection for purposes of this analysis, operates at an unacceptable Level of Service, then the Apx - 9 David Kennedy | CITY OF ANAHEIM Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope December 13, 2019 Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope 3 19‐0202 existing control delay should be maintained. The lead agency may consult with the California Department of Transportation to determine the appropriate target Level of Service if the maximum 35 seconds of control delay is not feasible. Thresholds of Significance For signalized study intersections, a project traffic impact is considered significant if: The addition of project generated trips is forecast to cause an increase in volume‐to‐capacity of 0.050 or greater when the intersection is operating at Level of Service C. The addition of project generated trips is forecast to cause an increase in volume‐to‐capacity of 0.030 or greater when the intersection is operating at Level of Service D. The addition of project generated trips is forecast to cause an increase in volume‐to‐capacity of 0.010 or greater when the intersection is operating at Level of Service E or F. For unsignalized study intersections, a project traffic impact is considered significant if: The addition of project‐generated trips is forecast to cause or worsen Level of Service E or F and a traffic signal is warranted based on the peak hour volume criteria established in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2014 Edition). The addition of project‐generated trips is forecast to increase the delay at intersections already at Level of Service E or F by 10 seconds or more. For Caltrans jurisdiction study intersections, a project traffic impact is considered significant if: The project causes or worsens unacceptable Level of Service at a freeway ramp. CAR WASH OFF‐STREET PARKING & QUEUEING ANALYSIS The number of off‐street parking spaces required for the car wash shall be evaluated based on the City of Anaheim Municipal Code and parking count data collected on one typical weekday and one typical Saturday at the three locations analyzed in the queuing and parking study for the existing Rapid Express Car Wash located at 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange, CA. A queuing analysis for the car wash shall also be evaluated based on data collected on one typical weekday and one typical Saturday at the three locations analyzed in the queuing and parking study for the existing Rapid Express Car Wash located at 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange, CA and the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019. This provides for data at six total locations. CONCLUSION We appreciate the opportunity to provide this scoping document for your review. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the proposed scope, please contact me at (714) 795‐3100 x 106. Apx - 10 % In % Out Rate % In % Out Rate Commercial Retail ITE 820 TSF 62% 38% 0.94 48% 52% 3.81 37.75 Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market ITE 945 FP 51% 49% 12.47 51% 49% 13.99 205.36 Automated Car Wash ITE 948 TSF [3] [3] [3] [3] [3] [3] [3] In Out Total In Out Total Existing Commercial Retail 20.200 TSF 12 7 19 37 40 77 763 ‐ Pass‐By Reduction (50% PM)4 ‐6 ‐4 ‐10 ‐19 ‐20 ‐39 ‐382 Total 6 3 9 18 20 38 381 Proposed Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market 12 FP 77 73 150 86 82 168 2,465 ‐ Pass‐By Reduction (50%)4 ‐39 ‐36 ‐75 ‐43 ‐41 ‐84 ‐1,233 Automated Car Wash 1 Site 25 24 49 55 54 109 911 ‐ Internal Capture (10%)5 ‐3 ‐2 ‐5 ‐6 ‐5 ‐11 ‐91 ‐ Pass‐By Reduction (20%)4 ‐4 ‐4 ‐8 ‐10 ‐10 ‐20 ‐164 Total 56 55 111 82 80 162 1,888 50 52 102 64 60 124 1,507 Notes: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Rate Trips Generated Land Use Quantity 1) ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017; XXX= Land Use Code 2) TSF = Thousand Square Feet; FP = Fueling Positions Difference 4) Pass‐by reduction values from Los Angeles Department of Transportation Traffic Impact Study Guidelines , 2016. 5) 10% internal capture reduction assumed for compatible lane uses. 3) Source: Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis , RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019. Data from three locations within Orange County. Table 1 Project Trip Generation Trip Generation Rates Land Use Source1 Units2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Units2 Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19‐0202Apx - 11 A p x - 1 2 A p x - 1 3 F i g u r e 3 P r o j e c t O u t b o u n d T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 . S i t e S81K,ST STBALL RD 2 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 .....QW )URP 3URMHFW /HJHQG A p x - 1 4 F i g u r e 4 P r o j e c t I n b o u n d T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 1 S i t e S81K,ST STBALL RD 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 3HUFHQW 7R 3URMHFW /HJHQG10 A p x - 1 5 A p x - 1 6 F i g u r e 6 P r o j e c t I n b o u n d P a s s - B y T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 1 S i t e S81K,ST STBALL RD 0 20 0 3HUFHQW 7R 3URMHFW /HJHQG A p x - 1 7 Bryan Crawford <bryandavidcrawford@gmail.com> RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement PHVVDJHV Giancarlo Ganddini JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP!7XH 'HF DW 30 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! David, A.ached is the proposed scoping agreement previously sent to you by Bryan Crawford from our o.ce. Let us know if you have any quesƟons or comments. Thanks, Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP Principal GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP From: David Kennedy [mailto:'.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 1:34 PM To: ilan Golcheh <LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP> Cc: Giancarlo Ganddini <JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP> Subject: RE: Tra ĸc Scoping Agreement Hi, Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 1 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 18 I am out of the oĸce most of the day. I just got in, but will be in meeƟngs the next few hours. Giancarlo, could you please contact me by email? David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 From: ilan Golcheh <LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 11:23 AM To: David Kennedy <'.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW> Cc: Giancarlo Ganddini <JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP> Subject: Re: Tra ĸc Scoping Agreement 'DYLG +RSH DOO LV ZHOO , MXVW ZDQWHG WR IROORZ XS RQFH DJDLQ VLQFH RXU SURMHFW LV YHU\ WLPH VHQVLWLYH :RXOG \RX SOHDVH JLYH *LDQFDUOR D FDOO WR GLVFXVV WKLV VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW" 7KDQN \RX YHU\ PXFK 'DYLG +LV QXPEHU LV EHORZ Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP Principal GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP 2Q 'HF DW 30 LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! ZURWH Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 2 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 19 'DYLG +RSH DOO LV ZHOO :RXOG \RX SOHDVH IROORZ XS ZLWK *LDQFDUOR LQ UHJDUGV WR WKH WUDIILF VWXG\ VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW" :H ZRXOG UHDOO\ OLNH WR PRYH IRUZDUG DQG VXEPLW DVDS WR WKH FLW\ WR JHW WR RXU KHDULQJ 7KDQN \RX YHU\ PXFK 6LQFHUHO\ ,ODQ *ROFKHK President Golcheh Group $IILOLDWHG ZLWK 3URJUHVVLYH 5HDO (VWDWH '5( /LFHQVH 1XPEHU 6 %HYHUO\ 'U /RV $QJHOHV &$ 6XLWH ,ODQ#*ROFKHK*URXSFRP &HOO 6FUHHQ 6KRW DW 30SQJ! 6LQFHUHO\ ,ODQ *ROFKHK President Golcheh Group $IILOLDWHG ZLWK 3URJUHVVLYH 5HDO (VWDWH '5( /LFHQVH 1XPEHU 6 %HYHUO\ 'U /RV $QJHOHV &$ 6XLWH ,ODQ#*ROFKHK*URXSFRP &HOO 19-0202-Scope.pdf . Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 3 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 20 David Kennedy '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW!7XH 'HF DW 30 7R *LDQFDUOR *DQGGLQL JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! Hi Giancarlo, A couple of comments: Please add ExisƟng plus CumulaƟve scenario. This is in our traĸc impact study guidelines and is required by CEQA. For the trip generaƟon for the express wash, our recent studies are using diīerent numbers based on trip data collected from express car washes within the county. I have aƩached one study which took the average of three car washes in Santa Ana that we have been using for some of the more recent projects. Since the parcel is immediately adjacent to State Route 57, Caltrans will be noƟfied of the project and sent a copy of the environmental document to review, and they will comment on the traĸc study. Therefore, the two Caltrans intersecƟons will require a HCM 6 analysis as well as the ICU analysis for the City. Use Caltrans traĸc impact methodology to determine if there are impacts based on their methodology. I can provide some feedback in this area if this is diĸcult to obtainͲ Caltrans someƟmes isnt forthcoming regarding the impact criteria. For consistency, I would also recommend considering the queueing informaƟon for the same three sample car wash locaƟons in Santa Ana. I have aƩached those as well (I also included the Ɵtle page for referencing). We would like to use the same data set for consistency, however the study did not have parking informaƟon. Trip DistribuƟonͲ OutboundͲ please make NB Sunkist and NB 57 20% each. InboundͲ Add 10% SB on Sunkist, Reduce NB Sunkist to 5%, EB Ball to 25% Inbound Pass ͲbyͲ make Sunkist 5% in both direcƟons Thanks! David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 4 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 21 >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 2 attachments Car Wash Queue Sites.pdf . Trip Gen Car Wash Sites.pdf . Bryan Crawford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ind Regards, Bryan Crawford Senior Transportation Planner GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana, CA 92705 o. 714 795 3100 x 104 c. 714 376 0224 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP ilan Golcheh LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP!7KX 'HF DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! &F *LDQFDUOR *DQGGLQL JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP! %U\DQ +RSH DOO LV ZHOO 3OHDVH JHW WKLV WR WKH FLW\ DVDS ,WV EHHQ D IHZ ZHHNV VLQFH ,YH FRQWUDFWHG ZLWK \RXU WHDP 7KDQN \RX >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ <image001.jpg> GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 5 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 22 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ <image001.jpg> GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ LPDJHSQJ! Kind Regards, Bryan Crawford Senior Transportation Planner GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 104 c. 714 376 0224 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!)UL 'HF DW 30 7R -HUHP\ .LQJ -HUHP\#JDQGGLQLFRP! &$' FKDQJHV >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Kind Regards, Bryan Crawford Senior Transportation Planner GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 6 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 23 Santa Ana, CA 92705 o. 714 795 3100 x 104 >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 2 attachments Car Wash Queue Sites.pdf . Trip Gen Car Wash Sites.pdf . David Kennedy '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW!)UL 'HF DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! HI Bryan, &XPXODWLYH SURMHFWV FDQ EH REWDLQHG IURP $QG\¶V 0DS KWWSDQDKHLPQHW'HYHORSPHQW$FWLYLW\ Thanks David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!)UL 'HF DW 30 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! &F *LDQFDUOR *DQGGLQL JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP! LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! 'DYLG 7KDQNV IRU WKH GLVFXVVLRQ HDUO\ UHJDUGLQJ WKLV SURMHFW DQG SURYLGLQJ WKH OLQN IRU FXPXODWLYH LQIR $WWDFKHG LV WKH UHYLVHG VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW EDVHG RQ \RXU FRPPHQWV DQG RXU GLVFXVVLRQ , OO SURYLGH WKH OLVW RI FXPXODWLYHV IRU UHYLHZ HDUO\ QH[W ZHHN DORQJ ZLWK &LW\ RI 2UDQJH SURMHFWV 7KDQN \RX >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 19-0202-Scope - Revised.pdf . Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!:HG 'HF DW 30 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 7 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 24 'DYLG $WWDFKHG LV WKH OLVW RI RWKHU GHYHORSPHQW WR EH XVHG LQ WKH UHSRUW IRU \RXU UHYLHZ $V \RX FDQ VHH , YH KLJKOLJKWHG ODQG XVH DQG TXDQWLWLHV WKDW ZH GRQ W KDYH LQIRUPDWLRQ IRU &DQ \RX UHYLHZ WKHVH SURMHFWV IRU DSSURYDOUHPRYDODGGLWLRQDO SURMHFWV WR EH DGGHG DQG ILOO LQ WKH PLVVLQJ ODQG XVHTXDQWLW\ LQIRUPDWLRQ RU GLUHFW PH WR WKH DSSURSULDWH SHUVRQ LQ 3ODQQLQJ ZKHUH , FDQ JHW WKLV LQIR" 7KDQN \RX >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 2 attachments OD List.pdf . Orange OD.pdf . David Kennedy '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW!)UL 'HF DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! Hi Bryan, I’ve taken a look at the items. For Noble Ale Works, the expansion replaces an 8,000 sf manufacturing tenant. I don’t have a breakdown of the new SF vs the old SF, but the vast majority of the expansion is for storage and manufacturing, which was essenƟally a net zero in trip generaƟon. So this can be removed from the list. Flamingo is a TI for a new owner, no expansion or change in use, so this can be removed. For the car wash, I aƩached the trip gen memo. In the Orange list, we only need the oĸce CUP, and the parking lot expansion if it generates new trips. I am oī next week and will be back on the 6th. Thanks and Happy New Year. David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Trip Generation Memo-COA comments.pdf . Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 8 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 25 ilan Golcheh LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP!0RQ -DQ DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! %U\DQ +RSH DOO LV ZHOO $Q\ XSGDWHV ZLWK WKH VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW" , QHHG WR VXEPLW DVDS >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ <image001.jpg> GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP From:David Kennedy [PDLOWR'.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW] Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2019 1:34 PM To:ilan Golcheh <LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP> Cc:Giancarlo Ganddini <JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP> Subject:RE: Tra ĸc Scoping Agreement Hi, I am out of the oĸce most of the day. I just got in, but will be in meeƟngs the next few hours. Giancarlo, could you please contact me by email? David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 From:ilan Golcheh <LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP> Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2019 11:23 AM To:David Kennedy <'.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW> Cc:Giancarlo Ganddini <JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP> Subject:Re: Tra ĸc Scoping Agreement David, Hope all is well. I just wanted to follow up once again since our project is very time sensitive. Would you please give Giancarlo a call to discuss this scoping agreement? Thank you very much David. Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 9 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 26 His number is below Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP Principal <image001.jpg> GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ LPDJHSQJ! >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 7ULS *HQHUDWLRQ 0HPR&2$ FRPPHQWVSGI! >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!7XH -DQ DW $0 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! 'DYLG 7KDQN \RX IRU WKLV LQIRUPDWLRQ DQG ZH KDYH XSGDWHG WKH OLVW DQG UHFHLYHG WKH WUDIILF FRXQWV IRU WKH SURMHFW &DQ \RX FRQILUP WKDW WKH UHYLVHG VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW LV DFFHSWDEOH EDVHG RQ WKH UHYLVLRQV PDGH WR LW DIWHU \RXU FRPPHQWV" 7KDQN \RX >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ David Kennedy '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW!:HG -DQ DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! Hi Bryan, The revised scoping with revisions is good. Please ensure the revised trip generaƟon table labels the correct sources for the diīerent land use informaƟon. Thanks >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!7KX -DQ DW $0 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 10 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 27 APPENDIX C VOLUME COUNT WORKSHEETS Apx - 28 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC2465 Thu, Dec 12, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:1 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM Ÿ PM N MD Ż W ( Ź OTHER S OTHER ź NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:120 2 202302 3 1 7:00 AM 5 26 43 165 104 57 35 228 10 74 195 48 990 7:15 AM 12 65 29 147 153 46 47 277 10 83 245 56 1,170 7:30 AM 5603514412955523281294243751,232 7:45 AM 73033137145603829615116242391,158 8:00 AM 6193810412241162861097272371,048 8:15 AM 817301251094116254116827720 976 8:30 AM 71534 9873451521487325829 869 8:45 AM 63335 8064291524047728138 902 VOLUMES 56 265 277 1,000 899 374 234 2,123 80 682 2,013 342 8,345 APPROACH %9% 44% 46% 44% 40% 16% 10% 87% 3% 22% 66% 11% APP/DEPART 598 /838 2,273 /1,651 2,437 /3,410 3,037 /2,446 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 30 174 135 532 549 202 153 1,187 47 390 1,002 207 4,608 APPROACH %9% 51% 40% 41% 43% 16% 11% 86% 3% 24% 63% 13% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.800 0.927 0.885 0.970 0.935 APP/DEPART 339 /533 1,283 /983 1,387 /1,857 1,599 /1,235 0 4:00 PM 8 101 63 71 78 33 50 253 9 77 309 112 1,164 4:15 PM 69849 7411437502066753261341,175 4:30 PM 10 114 73 80 113 36 61 301 11 57 371 139 1,366 4:45 PM 10 123 65 72 112 43 55 262 12 86 344 151 1,335 5:00 PM 11 123 80 60 120 28 74 287 8 79 375 164 1,409 5:15 PM 11 99 54 61 104 44 59 284 11 74 369 164 1,334 5:30 PM 13 129 71 64 130 36 66 276 8 61 316 163 1,333 5:45 PM 11 94 44 71 85 32 58 249 12 66 284 157 1,163 VOLUMES 80 881 499 553 856 289 473 2,118 77 575 2,694 1,184 10,279 APPROACH %5% 60% 34% 33% 50% 17% 18% 79% 3% 13% 60% 27% APP/DEPART 1,460 /2,524 1,698 /1,506 2,668 /3,174 4,453 /3,075 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 42 459 272 273 449 151 249 1,134 42 296 1,459 618 5,444 APPROACH %5% 59% 35% 31% 51% 17% 17% 80% 3% 12% 61% 26% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.903 0.953 0.955 0.960 0.966 APP/DEPART 773 /1,318 873 /788 1,425 /1,680 2,373 /1,658 0 AM 7:15 AM PM 4:30 PM Sunkist Sunkist Ball Ball INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Anaheim 6XQNLVW %DOO Apx - 29 91 1 1TOTAL 2 19 3M 22 AM 0 9 0 2 1 1 2 0 TO T A L 3M AM 1 2 0 A M 3 M T O T A L 2 1 1 1 0 2 2 AM 9 3M 10 1TOTAL 1 11 20 21 99 0TOTAL 11 3M 12 AM 1 9 9 2 9 2 2 9 2 2 1 TO T A L 3M AM $0 $0 $0 0 2 1$ A M 3 M T O T A L 2 2 1 30 30 30 9 2 1 2 1 2 1 AM 9 3M 11 Total 2 0 1112 SunNist SunNist SunNist Ba l l B a l l 3EAK +O8R AimTD LLC 7851,1* 029(0(17 &28176 SunNist Ba l l B a l l SC2 ALL +O8RS Anaheim Apx - 30 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC2465 Thu, Dec 12, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:2 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM Ÿ PM N MD Ż W ( Ź OTHER S OTHER ź NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:;;;0.5;1.5; 3 1 ; 3 1 7:00 AM 0 0 0 89 0 181 0 237 145 0 157 38 847 7:15 AM 000 92 02060251196018838971 7:30 AM 000124019302781960188421,021 7:45 AM 000140022602951830195291,068 8:00 AM 000129020302671810205371,022 8:15 AM 00012501810250155017737925 8:30 AM 00011702190222147014842895 8:45 AM 00011702370249143015357956 VOLUMES 0 0 0 933 0 1,646 0 2,049 1,346 0 1,411 320 7,705 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 36% 0% 64% 0% 60% 40% 0% 82% 18% APP/DEPART 0 /320 2,579 /1,346 3,395 /2,982 1,731 /3,057 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 0 0 485 0 828 0 1,091 756 0 776 146 4,082 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 37% 0% 63% 0% 59% 41% 0% 84% 16% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.897 0.966 0.952 0.956 APP/DEPART 0 /146 1,313 /756 1,847 /1,576 922 /1,604 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 90 0 175 0 302 89 0 372 60 1,088 4:15 PM 000 90 021802271010346421,024 4:30 PM 000 87 020203261210394441,174 4:45 PM 000105022303011180378631,188 5:00 PM 000103021802951060411771,210 5:15 PM 000112017702911050397521,134 5:30 PM 000 62 01490318970368471,041 5:45 PM 000 83 01270279850396531,023 VOLUMES 0 0 0 732 0 1,489 0 2,339 822 0 3,062 438 8,882 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 33% 0% 67% 0% 74% 26% 0% 87% 13% APP/DEPART 0 /438 2,221 /822 3,161 /3,071 3,500 /4,551 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 0 0 407 0 820 0 1,213 450 0 1,580 236 4,706 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 33% 0% 67% 0% 73% 27% 0% 87% 13% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.935 0.930 0.930 0.972 APP/DEPART 0 /236 1,227 /450 1,663 /1,620 1,816 /2,400 0 AM 7:15 AM PM 4:30 PM SR57 SB RamSs SR57 SB RamSs Ball Ball INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Anaheim 65 6% 5DPSV %DOO Apx - 31 00 10 1TOTAL 2221 3M 29 AM 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 TO T A L 3M AM 0 0 A M 3 M T O T A L 2 1 0 1 1 9 AM 0 3M 0 21TOTAL 0 0 0 0 20 10 92 TOTAL 2 122 3M 11 AM 9 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 2 2 TO T A L 3M AM $0 $0 $0 0 0 1$ A M 3 M T O T A L 2 0 30 30 30 1 2 0 1 9 1 0 1 1 AM 0 3M 0 120Total 0 0 0 0 SR- SB Ramps SR- SB Ramps SR- SB Ramps Ba l l B a l l 3EAK +O8R AimTD LLC 7851,1* 029(0(17 &28176 SR- SB Ramps Ba l l B a l l SC2 ALL +O8RS Anaheim Apx - 32 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC2465 Thu, Dec 12, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:3 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM Ÿ PM N MD Ż W ( Ź OTHER S OTHER ź NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 ;1 ;;;;31;31 7:00 AM 71 0 121 0 0 0 0 234 92 0 116 66 700 7:15 AM 88 0 103 0 0 0 0 250 93 0 138 81 753 7:30 AM 103 0 113 0 0 0 0 282 120 0 127 73 818 7:45 AM 88 0 142 0 0 0 0 343 96 0 136 96 901 8:00 AM 64 0 111 0 0 0 0 269 127 0 178 68 817 8:15 AM 59 0 128 0 0 0 0 268 107 0 155 70 787 8:30 AM 51 0 119 0 0 0 0 219 120 0 139 79 727 8:45 AM 60 0 77 0 0 0 0 238 128 0 150 92 745 VOLUMES 584 0 914 0 0 0 0 2,103 883 0 1,139 625 6,248 APPROACH % 39% 0% 61% 0% 0% 0% 0% 70% 30% 0% 65% 35% APP/DEPART 1,498 /625 0 /883 2,986 /3,017 1,764 /1,723 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 314 0 494 0 0 0 0 1,162 450 0 596 307 3,323 APPROACH % 39% 0% 61% 0% 0% 0% 0% 72% 28% 0% 66% 34% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.878 0.000 0.918 0.918 0.922 APP/DEPART 808 /307 0 /450 1,612 /1,656 903 /910 0 4:00 PM 119 0 66 0 0 0 0 251 141 0 313 116 1,006 4:15 PM 153 0 87 0 0 0 0 221 96 0 235 103 895 4:30 PM 154 0 72 0 0 0 0 290 123 0 284 115 1,038 4:45 PM 153 0 82 0 0 0 0 278 128 0 288 95 1,024 5:00 PM 154 0 82 0 0 0 0 250 148 0 340 106 1,080 5:15 PM 152 0 63 0 0 0 0 293 110 0 297 114 1,029 5:30 PM 156 0 96 0 0 0 0 275 109 0 259 99 994 5:45 PM 161 0 83 0 0 0 0 257 105 0 288 66 960 VOLUMES 1,202 0 631 0 0 0 0 2,115 960 0 2,304 814 8,026 APPROACH % 66% 0% 34% 0% 0% 0% 0% 69% 31% 0% 74% 26% APP/DEPART 1,833 /814 0 /960 3,075 /2,746 3,118 /3,506 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 613 0 299 0 0 0 0 1,111 509 0 1,209 430 4,171 APPROACH % 67% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 69% 31% 0% 74% 26% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.966 0.000 0.981 0.919 0.966 APP/DEPART 912 /430 0 /509 1,620 /1,410 1,639 /1,822 0 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Anaheim 65 1% 5DPSV %DOO SR57 NB RamSs SR57 NB RamSs Ball Ball AM 7:30 AM PM 4:30 PM Apx - 33 0000TOTAL 19 0 3M 0 AM 1 1 1 2 22 9 1 9 TO T A L 3M AM 0 0 A M 3 M T O T A L 2 1 1 0 1 0 2 9 AM 19 3M 1 1TOTAL 10 1 1 0000TOTAL 0 3M 0 AM 9 0 1 9 2 2 2 2 1 0 TO T A L 3M AM $0 $0 $0 0 0 1$ A M 3 M T O T A L 2 2 30 30 30 9 9 0 2 2 1 2 0 1 1 2 AM 0 3M 912 99 Total 920 9 120 AimTD LLC 7851,1* 029(0(17 &28176 SR- 1B Ramps Ba l l B a l l SC2 ALL +O8RS Anaheim SR- 1B Ramps SR- 1B Ramps SR- 1B Ramps Ba l l B a l l 3EAK +O8R Apx - 34 APPENDIX D LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS Apx - 35 EXISTING Apx - 36 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AME.pdf Scenario 1 Existing AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.605NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.650SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 B-0.654EB RightICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 37 0.654Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 207100239047118715320254953213517430Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 522519812297385113713334448Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 38 0.654Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.200.110.240.240.050.220.220.160.090.090.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 39 0.650Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 077600109108280485000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 01940027302070121000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467760756109108280485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 40 0.650Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.150.000.000.210.000.390.000.290.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 41 0.605Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3075960450116200004940314Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7714901132910000124079Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3075960450116200004940314Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 42 0.605Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.180.120.000.260.230.000.000.000.000.290.000.18V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 43 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PME.pdf Scenario 1 Existing PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.710NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.721SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C-0.705WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 44 0.705Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 618145929642113424915144927327245942Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 15536574112846238112686811511Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 45 0.705Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.280.290.090.230.230.070.180.180.080.220.220.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 46 0.721Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0158000121308200407000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 03950030302050102000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23615800450121308200407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 47 0.721Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.310.000.000.240.000.360.000.240.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 48 0.710Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43012090509111100002990613Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10830201272780000750153Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43012090509111100002990613Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 49 0.710Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.250.240.000.300.220.000.000.000.000.180.000.36V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 50 EXISTING ‐ CALTRANS Apx - 51 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AME.pdf Scenario 1 Existing AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B12.90.743NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B15.50.757SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 52 0.757Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 081200114108660507000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02030028502170127000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467760756109108280485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 53 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 54 0.00112.500.00155.41308.36284.1895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.004.500.006.2212.3311.3795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0062.500.0086.34194.11175.5450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.500.003.457.767.0250th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0014.240.0015.0018.0215.40d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.420.000.580.890.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.650.000.283.912.10d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0013.590.0014.7214.1013.30d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60919526091952769835c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891727s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.160.000.220.430.40(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.380.380.380.380.480.48g / C, Green / Cycle 232323232929gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 55 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 15.40 0.00 17.47 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.24 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.71 15.00 14.24 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.52 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.757 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.364 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.398 2.187 2.006 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 56 0.743Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3336460488126000005360341Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8316201223150000134085Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3075960450116200004940314Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 57 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 58 119.0962.22178.62136.40269.56143.4895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.762.497.145.4610.785.7495th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 66.1634.5799.2375.78164.4279.7150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.651.383.973.036.583.1950th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BABBCBLane Group LOS 12.199.6412.7211.0420.7914.42d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.440.270.640.520.870.49;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 1.840.270.910.173.860.54d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 10.359.3711.8110.8716.9313.87d1, Uniform Delay [s] 76024357602435618692c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.210.130.310.250.340.19(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.480.480.480.480.390.39g / C, Green / Cycle 292929292323gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 59 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.42 0.00 20.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.04 12.72 0.00 9.64 12.19 Movement LOS B C B B A B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]18.31 0.00 11.51 10.50 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]12.89 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.743 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.361 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.521 2.098 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 60 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PME.pdf Scenario 1 Existing PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B14.00.794NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.60.827SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 61 0.827Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0162600124808440419000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04060031202110105000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23615800450121308200407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 62 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 63 0.00250.450.00161.18293.53274.9995th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0010.020.006.4511.7411.0095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00150.020.0089.55182.69168.5450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.000.003.587.316.7450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0017.820.0013.8518.7216.51d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.770.000.590.880.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.002.750.000.263.732.20d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.070.0013.5914.9914.32d1, Uniform Delay [s] 66021166602116717773c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891712s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.320.000.250.400.37(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.420.420.420.420.450.45g / C, Green / Cycle 252525252727gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 64 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.51 0.00 18.16 0.00 13.85 0.00 0.00 17.82 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 17.62 13.85 17.82 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]16.56 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.827 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.328 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.216 2.246 2.454 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 65 0.794Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 44512520527115000003100635Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11131301322880000770159Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 43012090509111100002990613Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 66 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 67 191.90150.24208.55128.28125.52302.9595th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 7.686.018.345.135.0212.1295th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 107.0683.47119.0771.2769.73189.9450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.283.344.762.852.797.6050th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBBLane Group LOS 16.0212.5614.5511.5313.6119.82d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.610.540.720.490.480.87;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 3.790.891.380.160.553.48d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 12.2311.6713.1711.3713.0616.34d1, Uniform Delay [s] 72923367292336649727c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.280.250.330.230.200.36(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.460.460.460.460.410.41g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282424gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 68 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.82 0.00 13.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.53 14.55 0.00 12.56 16.02 Movement LOS B B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.78 0.00 12.48 13.47 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]14.03 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.794 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.396 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.482 2.493 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 69 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Apx - 70 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/13/2020Report File: C:\...\AMEP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.611NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.656SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C19.50.095SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)4 C20.60.167SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)3 B-0.666EB RightICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 B10.20.032WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopSunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/13/20201 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 71 0.032Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Sunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2301283827534Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6032127134Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 2301283827534Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 100110Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 22007260Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00128300534Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20202 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 72 BIntersection LOS 0.16d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.190.050.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.480.000.000.600.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.100.000.000.020.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAAMovement LOS 10.190.000.008.610.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.030.000.010.010.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20203 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 73 0.666Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 207103742547118717420254953213517930Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5225910612297445113713334458Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 207103742547118717420254953213517930Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 035350021000050Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20204 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 74 0.666Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.200.130.240.240.050.220.220.160.090.090.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/20205 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 75 0.167Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 20.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 32162718770460Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 84074690120Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 32162718770460Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 200010Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3025260450Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 016021851000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20206 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 76 CIntersection LOS 0.27d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0020.65d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0014.710.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.590.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0020.650.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.170.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20207 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 77 0.095Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 19.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 32163218770260Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8408469070Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 32163218770260Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 200010Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3030260250Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 016021851000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20208 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 78 CIntersection LOS 0.14d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0019.47d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.007.760.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.310.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0019.470.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.090.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20209 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 79 0.656Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 079600110408380485000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 01990027602100121000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467960761110408380485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020051301000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202010 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 80 0.656Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.160.000.000.220.000.390.000.290.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202011 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 81 0.611Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3076060460116500004940324Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7715201152910000124081Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3076060460116500004940324Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 010010300000010Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202012 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 82 0.611Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.180.120.000.270.230.000.000.000.000.290.000.19V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202013 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 83 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/13/2020Report File: C:\...\PMEP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.725NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.730SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 E36.90.248SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)4 E45.70.426SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)3 C-0.723WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 B15.00.079WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopSunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/13/20201 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 84 0.079Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Sunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 31087311381326Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 80218310332Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 31087311381326Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 400250Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 27009330Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00873001326Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20202 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 85 BIntersection LOS 0.26d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 14.960.150.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 6.400.000.001.690.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.260.000.000.070.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BABAAMovement LOS 14.960.000.0012.370.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.080.000.010.020.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20203 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 86 0.723Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 618150133842113427615144927327246542Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 15537585112846938112686811611Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 618150133842113427615144927327246542Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 042420027000060Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20204 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 87 0.723Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.280.290.100.230.230.080.180.180.080.220.220.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/20205 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 88 0.426Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 45.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 44241817020640Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 116054260160Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 44241817020640Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 6000100Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3831310540Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 023871671000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20206 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 89 EIntersection LOS 0.69d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAEApproach LOS 0.000.0045.69d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0047.370.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.001.890.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAEMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0045.690.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.430.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20207 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 90 0.248Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 36.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43242517020370Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11606426090Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43242517020370Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 500060Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3838310310Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 023871671000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20208 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 91 EIntersection LOS 0.32d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAEApproach LOS 0.000.0036.86d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0023.170.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.930.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAEMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0036.860.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.250.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20209 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 92 0.730Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0160600122808330407000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04020030702080102000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23616060456122808330407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 026061501300000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202010 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 93 0.730Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.310.000.000.240.000.360.000.240.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202011 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 94 0.725Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43012220521111400002990626Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10830601302790000750157Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43012220521111400002990626Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 013012300000013Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202012 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 95 0.725Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.250.240.000.310.220.000.000.000.000.180.000.37V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202013 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 96 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ‐ CALTRANS Apx - 97 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMEP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B12.90.751NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B15.60.764SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 98 0.764Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 083300115508770507000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02080028902190127000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467960761110408380485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020051301000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 99 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 100 0.00116.920.00159.14309.80285.3695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.004.680.006.3712.3911.4195th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0064.960.0088.41195.23176.4450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.600.003.547.817.0650th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0014.500.0015.2217.9515.33d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.430.000.600.890.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.700.000.303.942.11d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0013.800.0014.9314.0213.21d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60419366041936774840c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891725s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.160.000.230.440.40(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.380.380.380.380.490.49g / C, Green / Cycle 232323232929gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 101 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 15.33 0.00 17.40 0.00 15.22 0.00 0.00 14.50 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.64 15.22 14.50 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.63 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.764 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.367 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.416 2.195 2.018 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 102 0.751Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3336570499126400005360351Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8316401253160000134088Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3076060460116500004940324Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 010010300000010Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 103 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 104 119.1563.48184.86137.05269.36148.7195th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.772.547.395.4810.775.9595th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 66.1935.26102.7076.14164.2782.6250th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.651.414.113.056.573.3050th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BABBCBLane Group LOS 12.199.6712.9011.0620.7714.54d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.440.270.660.520.870.51;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 1.840.270.970.173.860.58d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 10.359.4011.9310.8916.9113.96d1, Uniform Delay [s] 75924347592434618693c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.210.130.310.250.340.20(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.480.480.480.480.390.39g / C, Green / Cycle 292929292323gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 105 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.54 0.00 20.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.06 12.90 0.00 9.67 12.19 Movement LOS B C B B A B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]18.30 0.00 11.58 10.52 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]12.93 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.751 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.368 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.529 2.104 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 106 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMEP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B14.30.811NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.90.837WB ThruHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 107 0.837Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0165200126308570419000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04130031602140105000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23616060456122808330407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 026061501300000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 108 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 109 0.00258.580.00165.49295.26276.5095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0010.340.006.6211.8111.0695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00156.120.0091.94184.02169.6950th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.240.003.687.366.7950th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0018.480.0014.1118.6216.41d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.790.000.600.880.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.003.090.000.283.742.21d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.390.0013.8314.8814.21d1, Uniform Delay [s] 65420966542096724779c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891710s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.320.000.250.400.37(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.410.410.410.410.460.46g / C, Green / Cycle 252525252727gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 110 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.41 0.00 18.06 0.00 14.11 0.00 0.00 18.48 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 17.52 14.11 18.48 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]16.87 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.837 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.332 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.238 2.254 2.468 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 111 0.811Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 44512650539115300003100648Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11131601352880000770162Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 43012220521111400002990626Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 013012300000013Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 112 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 113 195.61155.78218.71131.49123.27306.5795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 7.826.238.755.264.9312.2695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 109.7186.54126.4973.0568.48192.7350th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.393.465.062.922.747.7150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBBLane Group LOS 16.5712.9815.3011.8613.2619.61d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.620.550.750.500.470.88;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 4.010.951.620.170.523.48d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 12.5612.0313.6811.6912.7416.12d1, Uniform Delay [s] 71722997172299660740c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.280.250.340.230.200.36(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.450.450.450.450.420.42g / C, Green / Cycle 272727272525gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 114 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.61 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.86 15.30 0.00 12.98 16.57 Movement LOS B B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.55 0.00 12.95 13.92 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]14.34 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.811 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.404 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.490 2.500 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 115 EXISTING PLUS CUMULATIVE Apx - 116 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMEC.pdf Scenario 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.605NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.650SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 B-0.654EB RightICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 117 0.654Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 207100239047118715320254953213517430Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 522519812297385113713334448Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 118 0.654Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.200.110.240.240.050.220.220.160.090.090.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 119 0.650Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 077600109108280485000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 01940027302070121000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467760756109108280485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 120 0.650Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.150.000.000.210.000.390.000.290.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 121 0.605Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3075960450116200004940314Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7714901132910000124079Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3075960450116200004940314Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 122 0.605Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.180.120.000.260.230.000.000.000.000.290.000.18V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 123 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMEC.pdf Scenario 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.711NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.721SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C-0.705WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 124 0.705Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 618146229642113724915144927327245942Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 15536674112846238112686811511Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 618146229642113724915144927327245942Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030030000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 125 0.705Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.280.290.090.230.230.070.180.180.080.220.220.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 126 0.721Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0158300121508200407000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 03960030402050102000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23615830451121508200407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030120000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 127 0.721Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.310.000.000.240.000.360.000.240.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 128 0.711Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43012110509111300002990614Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10830301272780000750154Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43012110509111300002990614Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020020000001Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 129 0.711Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.250.240.000.300.220.000.000.000.000.180.000.36V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 130 EXISTING PLUS CUMULATIVE ‐ CALTRANS Apx - 131 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMEC.pdf Scenario 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B12.90.743NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B15.50.757SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 132 0.757Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 081200114108660507000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02030028502170127000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467760756109108280485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 133 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 134 0.00112.500.00155.41308.36284.1895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.004.500.006.2212.3311.3795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0062.500.0086.34194.11175.5450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.500.003.457.767.0250th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0014.240.0015.0018.0215.40d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.420.000.580.890.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.650.000.283.912.10d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0013.590.0014.7214.1013.30d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60919526091952769835c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891727s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.160.000.220.430.40(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.380.380.380.380.480.48g / C, Green / Cycle 232323232929gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 135 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 15.40 0.00 17.47 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.24 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.71 15.00 14.24 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.52 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.757 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.364 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.398 2.187 2.006 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 136 0.743Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3336460488126000005360341Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8316201223150000134085Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3075960450116200004940314Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 137 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 138 119.0962.22178.62136.40269.56143.4895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.762.497.145.4610.785.7495th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 66.1634.5799.2375.78164.4279.7150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.651.383.973.036.583.1950th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BABBCBLane Group LOS 12.199.6412.7211.0420.7914.42d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.440.270.640.520.870.49;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 1.840.270.910.173.860.54d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 10.359.3711.8110.8716.9313.87d1, Uniform Delay [s] 76024357602435618692c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.210.130.310.250.340.19(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.480.480.480.480.390.39g / C, Green / Cycle 292929292323gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 139 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.42 0.00 20.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.04 12.72 0.00 9.64 12.19 Movement LOS B C B B A B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]18.31 0.00 11.51 10.50 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]12.89 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.743 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.361 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.521 2.098 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 140 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMEC.pdf Scenario 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B14.00.795NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.60.827SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 141 0.827Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0162900125008440419000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04070031302110105000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23615830451121508200407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030120000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 142 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 143 0.00251.090.00161.53293.53274.9995th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0010.040.006.4611.7411.0095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00150.490.0089.74182.69168.5450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.020.003.597.316.7450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0017.860.0013.8618.7216.51d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.770.000.590.880.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.002.770.000.263.732.20d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.080.0013.6014.9914.32d1, Uniform Delay [s] 66021166602116717773c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891712s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.320.000.250.400.37(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.420.420.420.420.450.45g / C, Green / Cycle 252525252727gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 144 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.51 0.00 18.16 0.00 13.86 0.00 0.00 17.86 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 17.62 13.86 17.86 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]16.58 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.827 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.328 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.216 2.247 2.456 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 145 0.795Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 44512540527115200003100636Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11131301322880000770159Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 43012110509111300002990614Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020020000001Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 146 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 147 192.19150.84208.86128.80125.34303.2295th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 7.696.038.355.155.0112.1395th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 107.2783.80119.2971.5569.64190.1550th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.293.354.772.862.797.6150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBBLane Group LOS 16.0612.6014.5811.5613.5819.80d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.610.540.720.490.480.87;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 3.810.891.390.160.543.48d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 12.2511.7013.2011.4013.0416.32d1, Uniform Delay [s] 72823337282333650728c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.280.250.330.230.200.36(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.460.460.460.460.410.41g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282525gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 148 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.80 0.00 13.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.56 14.58 0.00 12.60 16.06 Movement LOS B B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.76 0.00 12.51 13.50 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]14.05 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.795 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.396 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.483 2.494 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 149 OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT Apx - 150 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMOYWO.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.628NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.674SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 B-0.678EB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 151 0.678Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 215104240649123415921057155314018131Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5426110212309405314313835458Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 215104240649123415921057155314018131Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 152 0.678Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.200.120.250.250.050.230.230.160.090.090.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 153 0.674Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 080700113508610504000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02020028402150126000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1528070786113508610504000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 154 0.674Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.160.000.000.220.000.400.000.300.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 155 0.628Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3196200468120800005140327Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8015501173020000129082Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3196200468120800005140327Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 156 0.628Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.190.120.000.280.240.000.000.000.000.300.000.19V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 157 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMOYWO.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.737NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.748SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C-0.731WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 158 0.731Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 643152030844118225915746728428347744Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16138077112966539117717111911Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 643152030844118225915746728428347744Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030030000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 159 0.731Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.290.300.090.240.240.080.180.180.080.220.220.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 160 0.748Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0164600126408530423000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04120031602130106000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 24516460469126408530423000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030120000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 161 0.748Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.320.000.000.250.000.380.000.250.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 162 0.737Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 44712590529115700003110639Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11231501322890000780160Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 44712590529115700003110639Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020020000001Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 163 0.737Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.260.250.000.310.230.000.000.000.000.180.000.38V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 164 OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT – CALTRANS Apx - 165 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMOYWO.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B13.40.773NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.00.787SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 166 0.787Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 084400118709010527000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02110029702250132000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1528070786113508610504000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 167 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 168 0.00122.200.00169.85315.91289.3395th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.004.890.006.7912.6411.5795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0067.890.0094.36199.96179.4850th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.720.003.778.007.1850th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0015.150.0015.9917.7815.00d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.450.000.630.900.83;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.780.000.364.082.13d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0014.370.0015.6313.7012.87d1, Uniform Delay [s] 58518755851875793861c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891726s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.170.000.230.450.41(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.370.370.370.370.500.50g / C, Green / Cycle 222222223030gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 169 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 17.20 0.00 15.99 0.00 0.00 15.15 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.39 15.99 15.15 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.95 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.787 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.382 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.489 2.212 2.024 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 170 0.773Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3466720508131000005570355Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8616801273280000139089Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3196200468120800005140327Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 171 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 172 130.9367.88196.35149.88275.53146.1095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 5.242.727.856.0011.025.8495th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 72.7437.71110.2583.27168.9481.1750th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.911.514.413.336.763.2550th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BBBBCBLane Group LOS 13.1410.2213.8111.8020.3513.92d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.470.280.690.550.870.50;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 2.130.301.150.203.850.53d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 11.019.9212.6611.6016.5113.39d1, Uniform Delay [s] 73823657382365640717c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.220.130.320.260.350.20(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.460.460.460.460.400.40g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282424gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 173 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]13.92 0.00 20.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.80 13.81 0.00 10.22 13.14 Movement LOS B C B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.85 0.00 12.36 11.22 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]13.39 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.773 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.379 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.560 2.120 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 174 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMOYWO.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B15.00.822NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B17.50.860WB ThruHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 175 0.860Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 17.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0169300130008780435000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04230032502190109000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 24516460469126408530423000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030120000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 176 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 024002400036000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 177 0.00271.440.00174.25306.76284.9695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0010.860.006.9712.2711.4095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00165.840.0096.80192.88176.1350th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.630.003.877.727.0550th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0019.540.0014.5019.1916.60d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.820.000.630.900.83;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.003.720.000.324.282.40d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.830.0014.1914.9114.20d1, Uniform Delay [s] 64620726462072731787c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891711s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.330.000.260.410.38(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.410.410.410.410.460.46g / C, Green / Cycle 242424242828gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 178 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.60 0.00 18.54 0.00 14.50 0.00 0.00 19.54 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 17.90 14.50 19.54 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]17.52 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.860 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.344 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 667 667 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 13.33 13.33 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.299 2.275 2.491 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 179 0.822Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 46313030548119800003220661Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11632601372990000800165Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 44712590529115700003110639Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020020000001Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 180 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 024002400000036Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 181 213.80171.24233.37146.10132.14319.6395th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 8.556.859.335.845.2912.7995th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 122.9095.13137.2981.1773.41202.8450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.923.815.493.252.948.1150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBBLane Group LOS 17.9013.7416.2112.5413.4719.89d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.650.570.770.530.480.88;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 4.571.041.790.190.533.48d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 13.3312.6914.4112.3512.9416.41d1, Uniform Delay [s] 71222827122282672753c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.290.260.340.240.200.37(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.450.450.450.450.420.42g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282626gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 626262626262C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 182 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.89 0.00 13.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.54 16.21 0.00 13.74 17.90 Movement LOS B B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.78 0.00 13.69 14.83 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.03 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.822 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.415 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 667 667 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 13.33 13.33 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.520 2.531 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 183 OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT Apx - 184 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/13/2020Report File: C:\...\AMOYW.pdf Scenario 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.634NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.680SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C20.30.099SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)4 C21.60.175SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)3 B-0.690EB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 B10.30.033WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopSunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/13/20201 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 185 0.033Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Sunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2301334827555Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6033427139Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 2301334827555Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 100110Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 22007260Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.001.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00128300534Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20202 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 186 BIntersection LOS 0.16d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.270.050.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.520.000.000.610.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.100.000.000.020.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAAMovement LOS 10.270.000.008.670.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.030.000.010.010.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20203 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 187 0.690Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 215107744149123418021057155314018631Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5426911012309455314313835478Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 215107744149123418021057155314018631Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 035350021000050Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20204 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 188 0.690Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.210.130.250.250.050.230.230.160.100.100.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/20205 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 189 0.175Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 21.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 32169119510460Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 84234880120Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 32169119510460Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 200010Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3025260450Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.001.041.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 016021851000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20206 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 190 CIntersection LOS 0.27d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0021.59d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0015.560.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.620.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0021.590.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.180.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20207 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 191 0.099Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 20.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 32169619510260Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8424488070Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 32169619510260Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 200010Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3030260250Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.001.041.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 016021851000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20208 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 192 CIntersection LOS 0.14d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0020.27d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.008.180.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.330.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0020.270.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.100.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20209 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 193 0.680Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 082700114808710504000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02070028702180126000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1528270791114808710504000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020051301000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202010 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 194 0.680Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.160.000.000.230.000.400.000.300.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202011 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 195 0.634Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3196300478121100005140337Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8015801203030000129084Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3196300478121100005140337Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 010010300000010Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202012 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 196 0.634Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.190.120.000.280.240.000.000.000.000.300.000.20V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202013 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 197 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/13/2020Report File: C:\...\PMOYW.pdf Scenario 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.752NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.757SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 E40.30.267SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)4 F51.20.460SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)3 C-0.749WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 C15.40.082WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopSunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/13/20201 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 198 0.082Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 15.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Sunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 31090811381379Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 80227310345Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 31090811381379Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 400250Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 27009330Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.001.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00873001326Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20202 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 199 CIntersection LOS 0.26d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.410.150.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 6.680.000.001.770.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.270.000.000.070.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CABAAMovement LOS 15.410.000.0012.730.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.080.000.010.020.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20203 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 200 0.749Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 643156235044118228615746728428348344Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16139188112967239117717112111Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 643156235044118228615746728428348344Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 045420327000060Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20204 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 201 0.749Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.290.310.100.240.240.080.180.180.080.230.230.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/20205 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 202 0.460Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 51.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 44251617720640Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 116294430160Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 44251617720640Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 6000100Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3834340540Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.001.041.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 023871671000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20206 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 203 FIntersection LOS 0.75d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAFApproach LOS 0.000.0051.21d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0052.250.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.002.090.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAFMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0051.210.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.030.020.000.460.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20207 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 204 0.267Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 40.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43252317720370Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11631443090Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43252317720370Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 500060Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3841340310Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.001.041.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 023871671000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20208 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 205 EIntersection LOS 0.34d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAEApproach LOS 0.000.0040.25d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0025.340.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.001.010.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAEMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0040.250.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.030.020.000.270.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20209 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 206 0.757Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0167200127908660423000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04180032002170106000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 24516720475127908660423000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 029071701300000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202010 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 207 0.757Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.330.000.000.250.000.380.000.250.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202011 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 208 0.752Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 44712720541116000003110652Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11231801352900000780163Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 44712720541116000003110652Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 015012500000014Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202012 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 209 0.752Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.260.250.000.320.230.000.000.000.000.180.000.38V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202013 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 210 OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT ‐ CALTRANS Apx - 211 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMOYW.pdf Scenario 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B13.40.780NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.10.794SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 212 0.794Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 086500120109110527000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02160030002280132000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1528270791114808710504000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020051301000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 213 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 214 0.00126.780.00173.68317.25290.3895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.005.070.006.9512.6911.6295th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0070.430.0096.49201.00180.2850th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.820.003.868.047.2150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0015.410.0016.2117.7314.94d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.460.000.650.900.83;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.840.000.384.112.15d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0014.570.0015.8313.6212.79d1, Uniform Delay [s] 58118615811861797865c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891725s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.170.000.240.450.42(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.370.370.370.370.500.50g / C, Green / Cycle 222222223030gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 215 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 14.94 0.00 17.14 0.00 16.21 0.00 0.00 15.41 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.34 16.21 15.41 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]16.06 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.794 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.385 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.505 2.220 2.035 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 216 0.780Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3466830518131300005570366Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8617101303280000139091Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3196300478121100005140337Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 010010300000010Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 217 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 218 131.0669.24201.28150.49275.23151.7895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 5.242.778.056.0211.016.0795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 72.8138.47113.8083.61168.7284.3250th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.911.544.553.346.753.3750th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BBBBCBLane Group LOS 13.1610.2714.0211.8220.3114.04d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.470.290.700.560.870.51;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 2.140.311.230.213.820.56d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 11.029.9612.7911.6216.4913.48d1, Uniform Delay [s] 73823647382364640717c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.220.130.330.260.350.21(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.460.460.460.460.400.40g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282424gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 219 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.04 0.00 20.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.82 14.02 0.00 10.27 13.16 Movement LOS B C B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.83 0.00 12.45 11.24 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]13.43 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.780 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.386 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.567 2.126 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 220 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMOYW.pdf Scenario 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B15.80.833NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B17.80.871WB ThruHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 221 0.871Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 17.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0172000131608910435000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04300032902230109000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 24516720475127908660423000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 029071701300000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 222 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 025002500035000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 223 0.00278.660.00177.48312.24289.0795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0011.150.007.1012.4911.5695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00171.330.0098.60197.12179.2850th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.850.003.947.887.1750th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ACABBBLane Group LOS 0.0020.060.0014.6119.5716.79d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.830.000.640.910.84;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.004.070.000.334.592.53d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.990.0014.2814.9814.26d1, Uniform Delay [s] 64520696452069732788c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891710s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.340.000.260.420.39(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.410.410.410.410.460.46g / C, Green / Cycle 242424242828gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 224 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.79 0.00 18.86 0.00 14.61 0.00 0.00 20.06 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A C A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 18.18 14.61 20.06 Approach LOS A B B C dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]17.84 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.871 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.349 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 700 700 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 12.68 12.68 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.320 2.283 2.506 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 225 0.833Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 46313170560120100003220675Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11632901403000000800169Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 44712720541116000003110652Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 015012500000014Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 226 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 024002400000036Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 227 224.60187.05254.61158.36140.59345.8095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 8.987.4810.186.335.6213.8395th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 130.81103.92153.1487.9878.11223.2750th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 5.234.166.133.523.128.9350th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBCLane Group LOS 18.4714.4117.2213.1513.9520.94d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.650.570.780.520.470.89;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 4.501.061.930.190.513.69d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 13.9813.3615.2912.9613.4317.25d1, Uniform Delay [s] 71522927152292680762c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.290.260.350.240.200.38(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.450.450.450.450.430.43g / C, Green / Cycle 292929292828gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 656565656565C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 228 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]20.94 0.00 13.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.15 17.22 0.00 14.41 18.47 Movement LOS C B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]18.68 0.00 14.44 15.47 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.78 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.833 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.424 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 667 667 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 13.33 13.33 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.528 2.539 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 229 APPENDIX E PARKING AND QUEUING DATA Apx - 230 AT:sl/rk15442.doc JN:2837-2019-01 GREENFOREST CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Anaheim, California Prepared for: Ms. Tricia Knott GREEN JET EXPRESS LLC. 235 West Florence Avenue Inglewood, CA 90301 Prepared by: RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Mohammad “Alex” Tabrizi, PE, TE Jethro Narciso, EIT Michael Torres July 31, 2019 Apx - 231 6-1 6.0 Access, On-Site Circulation and Queuing 6.1 Project Access Access for the site is currently provided as follows: • One inbound/outbound access driveway serving as the west leg of the signalized State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection. This access is currently controlled by the traffic signal and dedicated signal heads at this location; and • One inbound/outbound unsignalized access driveway located immediately south of the signalized State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection. The proposed project is planned to allow one-way on-site circulation with vehicles entering the site at the State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection and exiting the car wash at the south boundary of the site. Access for the proposed project is planned to be provided as follows: • One inbound access driveway serving as the west leg of the signalized State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection; and • One outbound unsignalized access driveway located immediately south of the signalized State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection. 6.2 On-Site Circulation Vehicles enter the project site from the north/main signalized driveway and proceed to access the automated car wash tunnel. Two drive aisles provide storage for vehicles waiting to enter the car wash and use the pay station before merging into a single aisle to access the car wash tunnel. A one-way escape lane is provided for vehicles to by-pass the car wash and exit the site. Vehicles proceed through the car wash tunnel. Upon exiting the car wash tunnel, vehicles may leave the site or proceed to use one of the self-serve vacuum parking stalls. 6.3 Queuing Vehicles may queue on-site while waiting to use the automated pay station and enter the car wash tunnel. Adequate storage space should be provided to ensure vehicles do not queue back onto State College Boulevard. Apx - 232 6-2 RK performed observed traffic counts at three (3) existing car wash facilities to obtain reference data on automated car wash queues. Table 6-1 shows the results of the observed queueing survey during weekday conditions and Table 6-2 shows the observed queuing results on Saturday. TABLE 6-1 Observed Car Wash Queuing - Weekday Observed Car Wash Location1 Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue (Vehicles) Scrub Bot Express Car Wash (1807 Main Street) 3 Zaroo Express Car Wash (1205 W. 17th Street ) 2 Santa Ana Express Car Wash (202 E. First Street) 5 Average 4 1 Weekday observed traffic counts conducted on Thursday, March 14, 2019. TABLE 6-2 Observed Car Wash Queuing - Saturday Observed Car Wash Location1 Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue (Vehicles) Scrub Bot Express Car Wash (1807 Main Street) 5 Zaroo Express Car Wash (1205 W. 17th Street ) 6 Santa Ana Express Car Wash (202 E. First Street) 14 Average 9 1 Saturday observed traffic counts conducted on Saturday, March 16, 2019. Queuing surveys were performed during the peak traffic generating hour observed on both weekday and Saturday conditions. The 95th percentile queue is calculated for each site and represents the maximum amount of vehicles stacked behind the car wash tunnel 95 percent of the time or less. The 95th percentile is typically considered the design queue for which the site should be designed to accommodate traffic. The average vehicle length, including headway, is considered 20 feet for queuing analysis purposes. The proposed site plan provides approximately 120 feet of double lane storage within the ingress drive aisle, from the pay station to the edge of the property line. An additional 47 Apx - 233 6-3 feet of single-lane storage space is provided from the pay stations to the car wash tunnel entrance. The total amount of space for on-site vehicle queuing upon entry is approximately 14 vehicles as shown in the project site plan on Exhibit 1-2; providing enough space for approximately 14 vehicles to wait in line for the car wash tunnel before backing up onto State College Boulevard. Based on the results of the observed queuing surveys, adequate storage space is expected to be provided to accommodate the average observed 95th percentile queue. Even under worst-case observed conditions, the project would be able to accommodate the maximum observed queue of 14 vehicles. Since the project inbound driveway serves as the west leg of the State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection, it is critical that the vehicles do not queue onto State College Boulevard. The vehicle queues should be monitored during car wash operations to ensure the vehicles do not queue onto State College Boulevard. In the event the queue is reaching State College Boulevard, the site operator should make necessary arrangements to stop accepting additional vehicles until the queue can be maintained at a maximum length of 14 vehicles without encroaching onto State College Boulevard. Apx - 234 In Out Total In Out Total Scrub Bot Express Car Wash (1807 Main Street)12 10 22 36 55 91 745 Zaroo Express Car Wash (1205 W. 17th Street )15 13 28 43 37 80 644 Santa Ana Express Car Wash (202 E. First Street)49 49 98 85 70 155 1,344 Average 25 24 49 55 54 109 911 Scrub Bot Express Car Wash (1807 Main Street)996 Zaroo Express Car Wash (1205 W. 17th Street )1,196 Santa Ana Express Car Wash (202 E. First Street)2,460 Average 1,551 64 118 83 In Out Total 229 166 2 Saturday observed traffic counts conducted on Saturday, March 16, 2019. 69 69 111 83 TABLE 4-1 Observed Car Wash Sites Trip Generation Observed Car Wash Location PM Weekday Daily Saturday Conditions2 Weekday Conditions1 68 133 137 1 Weekday observed traffic counts conducted on Thursday, March 14, 2019. AM Weekday Peak Hour Observed Car Wash Location Saturday Daily Saturday Peak Hour AT:sl/RK15422TB JN:2837-2019-01 Apx - 235 In Out Total In Out Total Weekday Trip Generation 25 24 49 55 54 109 911 Saturday Trip Generation 1,551 1 Source: Trip generation data based on observed traffic surveys conducted by RK Engineering Group, March 2019. 83 83 166 Saturday Conditions1 Project Trip Generation Saturday Peak Hour Saturday Daily In Out Total TABLE 4-2 Project Trip Generation Weekday Conditions1 Project Trip Generation Weekday Peak Hour Weekday DailyAMPM AT:sl/RK15422TB JN:2837-2019-01 Apx - 236 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, California 92705 | (714) 795-3100 | www.ganddini.com ORANGE COUNTY RIVERSIDE PALO ALTO June 11, 2019 Mr. Dennis Lee LEEDCO ENGINEERS, INC. 3870 Baldwin Avenue El Monte, CA 91731 RE: Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Study 01-7520 Mr. Dennis Lee: INTRODUCTION Ganddini Group, Inc. is pleased to provide this drive-through queuing and parking study for the proposed Oasis Car Wash project located at 387 North Tustin Street in the City of Orange. City staff has requested an analysis of the drive-through lane queuing length and parking demand based on observations at similar car wash facilities. The estimated peak queuing length and parking demand for the proposed project is formulated based on the highest hourly 85th-percentile queue length and parking demand observed at the similar car wash facilities. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at 387 North Tustin Street in the City of Orange. The project location map is shown on Figure 1. The site is currently occupied by an existing car wash. The project proposes to update the existing “old- fashion” style car wash facility to a modern car wash facility that is equipped with automatic pay stations and a vehicle drying area with vacuum posts. The proposed drive-through lane configuration provides queuing storage for approximately 23 vehicles from the two pay stations to the car wash tunnel entrance. There will be a drying area with 37 parking stalls that are equipped with vacuum posts for vehicle interior cleaning and drying the vehicle exterior after the vehicles have traveled through the wash tunnel, and another 7 standard parking stalls. The project is proposed to have one car wash tunnel that could accommodate approximately 5 vehicles through different stages of the car wash. The car wash is proposed to operate 7 days per week from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. There will be approximately 3 on-site employees. The site plan is illustrated on Figure 2. Appendix A also contains the project site plan. Since the proposed changes will substantially alter project site operations, the City has requested an analysis of the drive-through lane queuing lane demand and parking demand based on observations of other similar car wash facilities with similar modern amenities. CITY PARKING CODE REQUIREMENTS The City of Orange Municipal Code (OMC) Table 17.34.060.B lists several types of car wash facilities, and each type with a different parking requirements. The proposed project is for an automatic, but self-service Apx - 237 Mr. Dennis Lee LEEDCO ENGINEERS, INC. June 11, 2019 Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Study 01-7520 operated car wash facility with minimal on-site employees. The proposed project operational characteristics are different from the list of car wash facilities identified on the OMC; therefore, the City has requested an analysis of the parking demand based on observations of other similar car wash facilities with similar modern amenities. For informational purposes, Table 1 shows the required number of parking spaces calculated for the proposed project based on the following two types of car wash facilities listed in the OMC that have some similarities to, but also some differences from, the proposed project: • Type C Car Wash Facility, Automatic and Full Service (including hand dry) – 1 space per employee for employee parking, and 5 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for dry off area (spaces may be located in open pavement area as long as on-site circulation is not blocked). Auxiliary uses (i.e., office, retail) calculated separately. • Type D Car Wash Facility, Hand Wash and Hand Dry – 2 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for employee parking plus 5 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for dry off area (spaces may be located in open pavement area as long as on-site circulation is not blocked). Auxiliary uses (i.e., office, retail) calculated separately. As shown in Table 1, Type C car wash facility (automatic and full service including hand dry) requires 32 parking spaces, and Type D car wash facility (hand wash and hand dry) requires 39 parking spaces based on City Municipal Code requirements. Since the proposed project provides a drying area with a total of 44 parking spaces (37 vacuum station stalls and 7 standard parking stalls), more than adequate parking supply is forecast to be provided with a surplus of five (5) parking spaces based on the City Municipal Code requirements. OMC Section 17.34.080 Parking Requirements for Bicycle and Motorcycles indicates that 50 square feet of motorcycle parking and one (1) bicycle rack (with locking capabilities for 5 bicycles) is required for the project. SIMILAR CAR WASH SITE OBSERVATIONS AND COUNTS This analysis estimates the drive-through lane queuing demand and parking demand for the proposed project based on observations at three existing similar car wash facilities. These three similar car wash facilities were chosen as survey sites because they are comparable to the proposed project site in terms of the size, site configuration, typical operations, and available amenities. Field observations of drive-through lane queues and parking demand were conducted at the following three existing car wash facility locations: 1. Rapids Express Carwash – 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange CA; 2. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash – 1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana, CA; and 3. Speedie Clean Express Car Wash – 2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana, CA. The drive-through vehicular queues and number of parked vehicles were observed in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM during a typical weekday (Tuesday, July 10, 2018) and a typical Saturday (July 14, 2018). The observations were conducted using field surveys with technicians on-site. ESTIMATED QUEUE LENGTH AND PARKING DEMAND Table 2 and Table 3 summarize the results of the observed drive-through lane vehicular queue and parking demand data collected at the three similar car wash facility locations during a typical Tuesday and a typical Saturday, respectively. The drive-through queue length and parking demand summary in Table 2 and Table 3 present the observed average, 85th-percentile, and peak queue length and parking demand. Apx - 238 Mr. Dennis Lee LEEDCO ENGINEERS, INC. June 11, 2019 Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Study 01-7520 As shown in Table 2, the peak activity at each similar car wash facility were observed to occur intermittently during the late morning time period that coincided with the beginning of a typical work day and the afternoon peak period that coincided with the end of a typical work day. The queuing length and parking demand receded during less active times throughout the day. The peak queue length and parking demand within each 15- minute interval were observed to be sustained for only a few minutes at a time. As shown in Table 2, the Tuesday maximum peak vehicular queue length observed was 18 vehicles at the Rapids Express site, three (3) vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and nine (9) vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average queue for the Tuesday counts for the three survey sites is 7.0 vehicles during the evening peak period. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile queue is 13.2 vehicles during the evening peak period. Figure 3 shows graphical results of the Tuesday average queue, the 85th-percentile queue, and the peak queue for each time period throughout the day. As shown in Table 2, the Tuesday maximum peak parking demand observed was 20 parked vehicles at the Rapids Express site, 13 parked vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and 17 parked vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average parking demand for the Tuesday counts for the three survey sites is 14.3 parked vehicles throughout various times of the day. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile parking demand is 19.1 parked vehicles during the morning peak period. Figure 4 shows graphical results of the Tuesday average parking demand, the 85th-percentile parking demand, and the peak parking demand for each time period throughout the day. As shown in Table 3, the Saturday maximum peak vehicular queue length observed was 22 vehicles at the Rapids Express site, five (5) vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and eight (8) vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average queue for the Saturday counts for the three survey sites is 11.0 vehicles during the afternoon peak period. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile queue is 17.8 vehicles during the afternoon peak period. Figure 5 shows graphical results of the Saturday average queue, the 85th- percentile queue, and the peak queue for each time period throughout the day. As shown in Table 3, the Saturday maximum peak parking demand observed was 18 parked vehicles at the Rapids Express site, 21 parked vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and 21 parked vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average parking demand for the Saturday counts for the three survey sites is 18.0 parked vehicles throughout various times during the mid-day peak period. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile parking demand is 20.4 parked vehicles during the morning peak period. Figure 6 shows graphical results of the Saturday average parking demand, the 85th-percentile parking demand, and the peak parking demand for each time period throughout the day. The parking count data combined vehicles parked in vacuum station stalls and regular parking stalls. The field observation shows that some vehicles occupying the vacuum station stalls are not vacuuming but are either drying the vehicles or utilizing other amenities in the facility. Therefore, the overall parking demand includes all users of the car wash facility. PROJECTED QUEUE LANE AND PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT Assuming the proposed Oasis Car Wash project would experience queuing activity similar to the three survey sites, the typical peak queuing length is estimated to be approximately 18 vehicles from the pay station during peak periods based on the highest 85th-percentile queue length. Since the proposed project provides a vehicular queue storage capacity for approximately 18 vehicles, the drive-through storage capacity is forecast to be adequate. Apx - 239 Apx - 240 Apx - 241 Apx - 242 Proposed Use Component Quantity1 Units2 Parking Spaces Type C Car Wash Facility Automatic & Full Service Employee (6 Spaces)3 EMP 1.0 Space : 1 EMP 3 (including hand dry)3 Wash Tunnel Capacity - Customer Drying 5 Cars 5.0 Space : 1 Cars 25 Auxiliary Use 988 SF 4.0 Space : 1,000 SF 4 32 Type D Car Wash Facility Hand Wash & Hand Dry4 Wash Tunnel Capacity - Employee Drying 5 Cars 2.0 Space : 1 Cars 10 Wash Tunnel Capacity - Customer Drying 5 Cars 5.0 Space : 1 Cars 25 Auxiliary Use 988 SF 4.0 Space : 1,000 SF 4 39 44 +5 (1) (2) (3) (4)City of Orange Municipal Code, Table 17.34.060.B, Type D, Hand Wash & Hand Dry - 2 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for employee parking plus 5 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for dry off area (spaces may be located in open pavement area as long as on-site circulation is not blocked). Auxiliary uses (i.e., office, retail) calculated separately. Total Parking Notes: The car wash tunnel is assumed to be able to fit 5 cars being washed at various stage of the wash cycle. The interior building area (minus the car wash tunnel) is approximately 988 square feet for the auxiliary uses. The number of employees is assumed to be 3 employees. SF = Square Feet; EMP = Employees City of Orange Municipal Code, Table 17.34.060.B, Type C, Automatic & Full Service (including hand dry) - 1 space per employee for employee parking, and 5 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for dry off area (spaces may be located in open pavement area as long as on-site circulation is not blocked). Auxiliary uses (i.e., office, retail) calculated separately. Available Parking Supply, including 37 vacumm station stalls and 7 standard car parking stalls [See Figure 2] Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project C Total Parking D Table 1 Parking Requirement Based on City of Orange Municipal Code Type Parking Code Requirement Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 243 Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking 7:00 AM -7:15 AM 2 3 0 1 1 2 2 3 1.0 2.0 1.7 2.7 7:15 AM -7:30 AM 3 3 2 1 2 8 3 8 2.3 4.0 2.7 6.5 7:30 AM -7:45 AM 0 5 1 3 4 5 4 5 1.7 4.3 3.1 5.0 7:45 AM -8:00 AM 0 3 2 3 2 5 2 5 1.3 3.7 2.0 4.4 8:00 AM -8:15 AM 1 4 1 7 2 3 2 7 1.3 4.7 1.7 6.1 8:15 AM -8:30 AM 0 9 0 5 3 7 3 9 1.0 7.0 2.1 8.4 8:30 AM -8:45 AM 1 5 0 6 4 11 4 11 1.7 7.3 3.1 9.5 8:45 AM -9:00 AM 1 13 0 2 5 11 5 13 2.0 8.7 3.8 12.4 9:00 AM -9:15 AM 3 12 1 4 8 10 8 12 4.0 8.7 6.5 11.4 9:15 AM -9:30 AM 2 20 0 6 4 17 4 20 *2.0 14.3 *3.4 19.1 * 9:30 AM -9:45 AM 0 11 1 3 4 11 4 11 1.7 8.3 3.1 11.0 9:45 AM -10:00 AM 1 15 1 5 3 9 3 15 1.7 9.7 2.4 13.2 10:00 AM -10:15 AM 0 19 0 4 4 11 4 19 1.3 11.3 2.8 16.6 10:15 AM -10:30 AM 0 14 0 1 7 13 7 14 2.3 9.3 4.9 13.7 10:30 AM -10:45 AM 1 15 1 5 5 14 5 15 2.3 11.3 3.8 14.7 10:45 AM -11:00 AM 1 12 1 9 9 8 9 12 3.7 9.7 6.6 11.1 11:00 AM -11:15 AM 1 11 0 9 5 9 5 11 2.0 9.7 3.8 10.4 11:15 AM -11:30 AM 2 12 2 8 7 7 7 12 3.7 9.0 5.5 10.8 11:30 AM -11:45 AM 0 14 1 4 5 13 5 14 2.0 10.3 3.8 13.7 11:45 AM -12:00 PM 1 14 2 5 6 12 6 14 3.0 10.3 4.8 13.4 12:00 PM -12:15 PM 1 11 1 7 8 14 8 14 3.3 10.7 5.9 13.1 12:15 PM -12:30 PM 0 12 3 8 4 13 4 13 2.3 11.0 3.7 12.7 12:30 PM -12:45 PM 2 10 0 8 4 13 4 13 2.0 10.3 3.4 12.1 12:45 PM -1:00 PM 0 11 1 8 7 8 7 11 2.7 9.0 5.2 10.1 1:00 PM -1:15 PM 2 10 3 9 4 8 4 10 3.0 9.0 3.7 9.7 1:15 PM -1:30 PM 1 12 0 9 5 11 5 12 2.0 10.7 3.8 11.7 1:30 PM -1:45 PM 5 14 1 8 1 15 5 15 2.3 12.3 3.8 14.7 1:45 PM -2:00 PM 4 14 0 7 6 12 6 14 3.3 11.0 5.4 13.4 2:00 PM -2:15 PM 6 17 1 7 1 13 6 17 2.7 12.3 4.5 15.8 2:15 PM -2:30 PM 3 15 1 8 4 12 4 15 2.7 11.7 3.7 14.1 2:30 PM -2:45 PM 5 16 0 10 1 17 5 17 2.0 14.3 *3.8 16.7 2:45 PM -3:00 PM 7 12 0 11 1 14 7 14 2.7 12.3 5.2 13.4 3:00 PM -3:15 PM 3 16 0 9 2 6 3 16 1.7 10.3 2.7 13.9 3:15 PM -3:30 PM 4 15 1 8 3 14 4 15 2.7 12.3 3.7 14.7 3:30 PM -3:45 PM 2 19 1 7 1 17 2 19 1.3 14.3 *1.7 18.4 3:45 PM -4:00 PM 2 15 0 7 5 13 5 15 2.3 11.7 4.1 14.4 4:00 PM -4:15 PM 3 15 0 1 7 7 7 15 3.3 7.7 5.8 12.6 4:15 PM -4:30 PM 6 12 2 4 4 13 6 13 4.0 9.7 5.4 12.7 4:30 PM -4:45 PM 5 13 1 4 1 11 5 13 2.3 9.3 3.8 12.4 4:45 PM -5:00 PM 4 14 0 5 3 13 4 14 2.3 10.7 3.7 13.7 5:00 PM -5:15 PM 6 9 0 3 3 10 6 10 3.0 7.3 5.1 9.7 5:15 PM -5:30 PM 3 16 2 4 2 8 3 16 2.3 9.3 2.7 13.6 5:30 PM -5:45 PM 6 14 0 7 4 8 6 14 3.3 9.7 5.4 12.2 5:45 PM -6:00 PM 3 15 3 7 1 8 3 15 2.3 10.0 3.0 12.9 6:00 PM -6:15 PM 5 17 0 13 2 13 5 17 2.3 14.3 *4.1 15.8 6:15 PM -6:30 PM 4 9 0 9 0 12 4 12 1.3 10.0 2.8 11.1 6:30 PM -6:45 PM 5 11 1 9 5 9 5 11 3.7 9.7 5.0 10.4 6:45 PM -7:00 PM 3 14 1 11 2 13 3 14 2.0 12.7 2.7 13.7 7:00 PM -7:15 PM 1 17 0 11 0 8 1 17 0.3 12.0 0.7 15.2 7:15 PM -7:30 PM 4 12 0 12 1 9 4 12 1.7 11.0 3.1 12.0 7:30 PM -7:45 PM 1 14 0 12 1 12 1 14 0.7 12.7 1.0 13.4 7:45 PM - 8:00 PM 18 4 1 11 2 9 18 *11 7.0 *8.0 13.2 *10.4 18 20 3 13 9 17 2.8 12.3 0.8 6.6 3.6 10.6 5.0 16.0 2.0 9.4 6.0 13.4 Site 85th Percentile Time Period Rapids Express Scrub Bot Express Speedie Clean Express Site Average Site Peak Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Parking Summary of Tuesday Queuing Length and Parking Demand Observation (July 10, 2018) Table 2 Hourly Average Queue Parking Hourly Peak Queue Parking Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 244 Figure 3 0 5 10 15 20 25 7: 0 0 A M 7: 1 5 A M 7: 3 0 A M 7: 4 5 A M 8: 0 0 A M 8: 1 5 A M 8: 3 0 A M 8: 4 5 A M 9: 0 0 A M 9: 1 5 A M 9: 3 0 A M 9: 4 5 A M 10 : 0 0 A M 10 : 1 5 A M 10 : 3 0 A M 10 : 4 5 A M 11 : 0 0 A M 11 : 1 5 A M 11 : 3 0 A M 11 : 4 5 A M 12 : 0 0 P M 12 : 1 5 P M 12 : 3 0 P M 12 : 4 5 P M 1: 0 0 P M 1: 1 5 P M 1: 3 0 P M 1: 4 5 P M 2: 0 0 P M 2: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M 3: 0 0 P M 3: 1 5 P M 3: 3 0 P M 3: 4 5 P M 4: 0 0 P M 4: 1 5 P M 4: 3 0 P M 4: 4 5 P M 5: 0 0 P M 5: 1 5 P M 5: 3 0 P M 5: 4 5 P M 6: 0 0 P M 6: 1 5 P M 6: 3 0 P M 6: 4 5 P M 7: 0 0 P M 7: 1 5 P M 7: 3 0 P M 7: 4 5 P M Nu m b e r o f P a r k e d V e h i c l e s Time of the Day Tuesday Hourly Parking Demand Observation Rapids Express Parking Scrub Bot Express Parking Speedie Clean Express Parking Hourly Average Parking Hourly 85th Percentile Parking Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 245 Figure 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 7: 0 0 A M 7: 1 5 A M 7: 3 0 A M 7: 4 5 A M 8: 0 0 A M 8: 1 5 A M 8: 3 0 A M 8: 4 5 A M 9: 0 0 A M 9: 1 5 A M 9: 3 0 A M 9: 4 5 A M 10 : 0 0 A M 10 : 1 5 A M 10 : 3 0 A M 10 : 4 5 A M 11 : 0 0 A M 11 : 1 5 A M 11 : 3 0 A M 11 : 4 5 A M 12 : 0 0 P M 12 : 1 5 P M 12 : 3 0 P M 12 : 4 5 P M 1: 0 0 P M 1: 1 5 P M 1: 3 0 P M 1: 4 5 P M 2: 0 0 P M 2: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M 3: 0 0 P M 3: 1 5 P M 3: 3 0 P M 3: 4 5 P M 4: 0 0 P M 4: 1 5 P M 4: 3 0 P M 4: 4 5 P M 5: 0 0 P M 5: 1 5 P M 5: 3 0 P M 5: 4 5 P M 6: 0 0 P M 6: 1 5 P M 6: 3 0 P M 6: 4 5 P M 7: 0 0 P M 7: 1 5 P M 7: 3 0 P M 7: 4 5 P M Nu m b e r o f Q u e u i n g V e h i c l e s Time of the Day Tuesday Hourly Queue Length Observation Rapids Express Queue Scrub Bot Express Queue Speedie Clean Express Queue Hourly Average Queue Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 246 Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking 7:00 AM -7:15 AM 2 7 0 6 3 5 3 7 1.7 6.0 2.7 6.7 7:15 AM -7:30 AM 5 11 1 10 2 13 5 13 2.7 11.3 4.1 12.4 7:30 AM -7:45 AM 3 12 0 12 3 11 3 12 2.0 11.7 3.0 12.0 7:45 AM -8:00 AM 2 11 0 10 1 12 2 12 1.0 11.0 1.7 11.7 8:00 AM -8:15 AM 5 15 2 8 0 10 5 15 2.3 11.0 4.1 13.5 8:15 AM -8:30 AM 4 14 0 10 2 14 4 14 2.0 12.7 3.4 14.0 8:30 AM -8:45 AM 6 15 0 10 6 15 6 15 4.0 13.3 6.0 15.0 8:45 AM -9:00 AM 3 17 0 6 2 18 3 18 1.7 13.7 2.7 17.7 9:00 AM -9:15 AM 6 18 1 10 1 13 6 18 2.7 13.7 4.5 16.5 9:15 AM -9:30 AM 4 16 1 11 3 14 4 16 2.7 13.7 3.7 15.4 9:30 AM -9:45 AM 4 17 1 10 0 14 4 17 1.7 13.7 3.1 16.1 9:45 AM -10:00 AM 6 16 3 14 4 15 6 16 4.3 15.0 5.4 15.7 10:00 AM -10:15 AM 5 14 3 21 3 19 5 21 *3.7 18.0 *4.4 20.4 * 10:15 AM -10:30 AM 4 16 0 11 1 16 4 16 1.7 14.3 3.1 16.0 10:30 AM -10:45 AM 5 18 1 12 4 19 5 19 3.3 16.3 4.7 18.7 10:45 AM -11:00 AM 9 17 2 15 2 15 9 17 4.3 15.7 6.9 16.4 11:00 AM -11:15 AM 9 18 4 15 4 16 9 18 5.7 16.3 7.5 17.4 11:15 AM -11:30 AM 9 14 3 15 4 17 9 17 5.3 15.3 7.5 16.4 11:30 AM -11:45 AM 11 15 5 18 7 21 11 21 *7.7 18.0 *9.8 20.1 11:45 AM -12:00 PM 9 16 3 19 6 14 9 19 6.0 16.3 8.1 18.1 12:00 PM -12:15 PM 14 17 1 20 4 15 14 20 6.3 17.3 11.0 19.1 12:15 PM -12:30 PM 10 15 0 18 5 15 10 18 5.0 16.0 8.5 17.1 12:30 PM -12:45 PM 6 16 1 9 6 21 6 21 *4.3 15.3 6.0 19.5 12:45 PM -1:00 PM 15 15 2 12 5 18 15 18 7.3 15.0 12.0 17.1 1:00 PM -1:15 PM 14 18 5 13 6 19 14 19 8.3 16.7 11.6 18.7 1:15 PM -1:30 PM 14 18 4 15 7 20 14 20 8.3 17.7 11.9 19.4 1:30 PM -1:45 PM 22 4 3 16 8 21 22 *21 *11.0 *13.7 17.8 *19.5 1:45 PM -2:00 PM 21 4 0 15 4 16 21 16 8.3 11.7 15.9 15.7 2:00 PM -2:15 PM 19 7 2 13 0 20 19 20 7.0 13.3 13.9 17.9 2:15 PM -2:30 PM 14 3 0 15 2 15 14 15 5.3 11.0 10.4 15.0 2:30 PM -2:45 PM 17 5 0 14 4 13 17 14 7.0 10.7 13.1 13.7 2:45 PM -3:00 PM 18 4 2 12 1 15 18 15 7.0 10.3 13.2 14.1 3:00 PM -3:15 PM 18 2 1 14 5 21 18 21 *8.0 12.3 14.1 18.9 3:15 PM -3:30 PM 20 5 0 13 3 19 20 19 7.7 12.3 14.9 17.2 3:30 PM -3:45 PM 17 3 0 13 3 16 17 16 6.7 10.7 12.8 15.1 3:45 PM -4:00 PM 22 6 3 12 7 17 22 *17 10.7 11.7 17.5 15.5 4:00 PM -4:15 PM 19 2 2 12 0 14 19 14 7.0 9.3 13.9 13.4 4:15 PM -4:30 PM 17 0 4 13 5 20 17 20 8.7 11.0 13.4 17.9 4:30 PM -4:45 PM 18 1 1 16 3 15 18 16 7.3 10.7 13.5 15.7 4:45 PM -5:00 PM 16 3 1 16 5 9 16 16 7.3 9.3 12.7 13.9 5:00 PM -5:15 PM 13 2 2 12 2 11 13 12 5.7 8.3 9.7 11.7 5:15 PM -5:30 PM 13 1 1 15 1 11 13 15 5.0 9.0 9.4 13.8 5:30 PM -5:45 PM 12 0 0 13 1 15 12 15 4.3 9.3 8.7 14.4 5:45 PM -6:00 PM 12 2 2 14 5 16 12 16 6.3 10.7 9.9 15.4 6:00 PM -6:15 PM 10 0 3 13 3 19 10 19 5.3 10.7 7.9 17.2 6:15 PM -6:30 PM 9 0 2 14 3 17 9 17 4.7 10.3 7.2 16.1 6:30 PM -6:45 PM 9 0 3 13 2 11 9 13 4.7 8.0 7.2 12.4 6:45 PM -7:00 PM 8 0 0 10 1 9 8 10 3.0 6.3 5.9 9.7 7:00 PM -7:15 PM 7 0 0 12 1 7 7 12 2.7 6.3 5.2 10.5 7:15 PM -7:30 PM 8 0 0 8 2 10 8 10 3.3 6.0 6.2 9.4 7:30 PM -7:45 PM 6 0 1 8 4 11 6 11 3.7 6.3 5.4 10.1 7:45 PM - 8:00 PM 6 0 0 13 2 12 6 13 2.7 8.3 4.8 12.7 22 18 5 21 8 21 10.7 8.7 1.5 12.9 3.2 15.0 18.0 17.0 3.0 15.4 5.4 19.0 Table 3 Summary of Saturday Queuing Length and Parking Demand Observation (July 14, 2018) Time Period Rapids Express Scrub Bot Express Speedie Clean Express Hourly Peak Hourly Average Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Site Average Site 85th Percentile Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking Site Peak Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 247 Figure 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 7: 0 0 A M 7: 1 5 A M 7: 3 0 A M 7: 4 5 A M 8: 0 0 A M 8: 1 5 A M 8: 3 0 A M 8: 4 5 A M 9: 0 0 A M 9: 1 5 A M 9: 3 0 A M 9: 4 5 A M 10 : 0 0 A M 10 : 1 5 A M 10 : 3 0 A M 10 : 4 5 A M 11 : 0 0 A M 11 : 1 5 A M 11 : 3 0 A M 11 : 4 5 A M 12 : 0 0 P M 12 : 1 5 P M 12 : 3 0 P M 12 : 4 5 P M 1: 0 0 P M 1: 1 5 P M 1: 3 0 P M 1: 4 5 P M 2: 0 0 P M 2: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M 3: 0 0 P M 3: 1 5 P M 3: 3 0 P M 3: 4 5 P M 4: 0 0 P M 4: 1 5 P M 4: 3 0 P M 4: 4 5 P M 5: 0 0 P M 5: 1 5 P M 5: 3 0 P M 5: 4 5 P M 6: 0 0 P M 6: 1 5 P M 6: 3 0 P M 6: 4 5 P M 7: 0 0 P M 7: 1 5 P M 7: 3 0 P M 7: 4 5 P M Nu m b e r o f P a r k e d V e h i c l e s Time of the Day Saturday Hourly Parking Demand Observation Rapids Express Parking Scrub Bot Express Parking Speedie Clean Express Parking Hourly Average Parking Hourly 85th Percentile Parking Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 248 Figure 6 0 5 10 15 20 25 7: 0 0 A M 7: 1 5 A M 7: 3 0 A M 7: 4 5 A M 8: 0 0 A M 8: 1 5 A M 8: 3 0 A M 8: 4 5 A M 9: 0 0 A M 9: 1 5 A M 9: 3 0 A M 9: 4 5 A M 10 : 0 0 A M 10 : 1 5 A M 10 : 3 0 A M 10 : 4 5 A M 11 : 0 0 A M 11 : 1 5 A M 11 : 3 0 A M 11 : 4 5 A M 12 : 0 0 P M 12 : 1 5 P M 12 : 3 0 P M 12 : 4 5 P M 1: 0 0 P M 1: 1 5 P M 1: 3 0 P M 1: 4 5 P M 2: 0 0 P M 2: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M 3: 0 0 P M 3: 1 5 P M 3: 3 0 P M 3: 4 5 P M 4: 0 0 P M 4: 1 5 P M 4: 3 0 P M 4: 4 5 P M 5: 0 0 P M 5: 1 5 P M 5: 3 0 P M 5: 4 5 P M 6: 0 0 P M 6: 1 5 P M 6: 3 0 P M 6: 4 5 P M 7: 0 0 P M 7: 1 5 P M 7: 3 0 P M 7: 4 5 P M Nu m b e r o f Q u e u i n g V e h i c l e s Time of the Day Saturday Hourly Queue Length Observation Rapids Express Queue Scrub Bot Express Queue Speedie Clean Express Queue Hourly Average Queue Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 249 21 6 27 44 +17 (1) Notes: The updated floor plan shows approximately 1,464 square feet of gross floor area, minus the car wash tunnel. The auxiliary use of 1,464 square feet x 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet (office use) would be 6 required spaces, as requested by the Ctiy. Parking Supply Adequacy Assessment Based on Estimated Parking Demand Table 4 Parking Analysis Components Estimated Peak Project Parking Demand - Estimate Based on Traffic Counts at Comparable Car Wash Facilities with Similar Operational Characteristics [See Tables 2 and 3] Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Oasis Car Wash Project Parking Spaces Additional Parking Supply Requested by the City for Auxiliary Uses1 Available Parking Supply Provided by the Proposed Oasis Car Wash Project, including 37 vacumm station stalls and 7 standard car parking stalls [See Figure 2] Total Number of Parking Spaces Required for the Proposed Oasis Car Wash Project Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 250 APPENDIX A SITE PLAN Apx - 251 EXIT ONLY LOADING 01 2#4-+0)EXIT ONLY LOADING S H E E T T I T L E P R O J E C T T I T L E NO.DATE DESCRIPTION P R O J E C T N U M B E R S Y N A R C S T U D I O E X P R E S S L Y R E S E R V E S I T S C O M M O N L A W C O P Y R I G H T A N D O T H E R P R O P E R T Y R I G H T S I N T H E S E D O C U M E N T S . T H E S E D O C U M E N T S A R E N O T T O B E R E P R O D U C E D , C H A N G E D , O R C O P I E D I N A N Y F O R M O R M A N N E R W H A T S O E V E R . N O R A R E T H E Y T O B E A S S I G N E D T O A N Y T H I R D P A R T Y W I T H O U T F I R S T O B T A I N I N G T H E E X P R E S S E D W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N A N D C O N S E N T O F S Y N A R C S T U D I O . 2 4 0 0 m a i n s t . s u i t e 2 0 3 . i r v i n e . c a . 9 2 6 1 4 o . 9 4 9 - 5 9 6 - 7 3 6 2 O R A N G E E X P R E S S C A R W A S H 3 8 7 N . T U S T I N S T . O R A N G E , C A 9 2 8 6 7 N A p x - 2 5 2 GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, CA 92705 714.795.3100 | www.ganddini.com City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Appendix D.1 – Noise Study Veneklasen Associates Consultants in Acoustics | Noise | Vibration | AV | IT 1711 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica California 90404 • tel: 310.450.1733 • fax: 310.396.3424 • www.veneklasen.com November 25, 2020 Golcheh Group 1180 Beverly Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90035 Attention: Ilan Golcheh | President Subject: East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study VA Project No. 7431-001 Dear Ilan: Veneklasen Associates, Inc. (Veneklasen) was contracted to perform an acoustical study to evaluate the proposed East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash project in Anaheim, California. This study includes an assessment of the existing and future sound levels as caused by traffic, car wash activity, and any mechanical equipment for the convenience store compared to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. This report documents our findings. A list of acoustical terms and their definitions is presented in Appendix A. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following report contains the results of an acoustical study conducted for the East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash in Anaheim, California. The project consists of a future convenience store and car wash which i ncludes mechanical equipment for the convenience store and washing machines, blowers and sprayers for the car wash tunnel. An exterior area with a vacuum system is also included with a canopy structure. The hours of operation are understood to be Monday through Sunday, 7:00am to 9:00pm for the car wash portion, which generates the most amount of noise at the site. 2.0 NOISE CRITERIA The City of Anaheim Municipal Code establishes a noise ordinance in Chapter 6.70. This ordinance regulates various types of noise sources and establishes sound level limits for those sources. Section 6.70.010 states the following: “No person shall within the City create any sound radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces a sound pressure level at any point on the property line in excess of sixty [60] decibels…read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. Readings shall be taken in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s instructions, using the slowest meter response.” Section 6.70.010 also states the following: “At any point, the measured level shall be the average of three (3) readings taken at two (2) minute intervals. To have valid readings, the levels must be five (5) decibels or more above the levels prevailing at the same point when the source(s) of the alleged objectionable sound are not operating.” Veneklasen has interpreted this language to indicate that if the existing ambient noise level matches or exceeds the 60 dBA limit established by the ordinance, then the new maximum allowable exterior standard would become 5 dBA above the existing ambient noise level. Veneklasen will utilize this interpretation to assess compliance of the future project with the noise ordinance as established by the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 2 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 2 of 10 www.veneklasen.com 3.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC AND EQUIPMENT SOUND MEASUREMENTS Sound measurements were conducted at the proposed project site to capture existing ambient noise levels on July 15, 2019. Shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 below. These acoustical measurements were conducted with Brüel & Kjær Type 2270 sound level meters, which conform to ANSI S.14-1961 for Type 1 precision sound level meters and were conducted using Brüel & Kjær Type 4189 microphones. Figure 1 – Project Site Location Table 1 – Existing Ambient Noise Measurements Location Time Daytime Hour Leq (dBA) S1 1:00 PM 70 S2 68 Veneklasen does not anticipate a significant variation in the overall level during the evening hours due to the project site’s proximity to Highway 57 and the significant traffic volume along Ball Road. Based on previous measurements completed by Veneklasen, statistical analysis, and traffic patterns, we expect the noise levels to be similar throughout daytime and evening hours. This is primarily due to an increase in free-flowing traffic along Highway 57 during the evening hours, which results in higher noise levels as caused by tire noise. In addition, Veneklasen utilized sound measurements conducted for a previous project at an existing Rapid Express Car Wash at 2045 North Tustin Street in Orange, California on July 30, 2019. Measurements were performed on the blowers, water sprayers, rotating brushes and central vacuum. The sound levels for each source were measured independently to determine the levels of each piece of equipment that could be used to incorporate into the computer model. All of the acoustical measurements of the equipment were conducted with an NTi XL2 sound level meter, which conforms to ANSI S.14-1961 for Type 1 precision sound level meters. All measurement equipment was field-calibrated before use. A summary of measured noise levels from the car wash mechanical equipment is shown in Table 2. Table 2 – Car Wash Equipment Noise Measurement Results Equipment Distance, ft Leq (dBA) Blowers 5 101 Water Sprayers 5 85 Rotating Brushes 5 89 Central Vacuum 3 80 Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 3 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 3 of 10 www.veneklasen.com 4.0 NOISE MODELING, ANALYSIS, AND RESULTS From the measurement data and provided specifications, Veneklasen has utilized the Brüel & Kjær Predictor computer software program in order to predict sound levels at various locations around the project site. Sound exposure due to the proposed building geometry for the car wash and convenience store was modeled based on drawings provided by the Client. Traffic counts for local roadways were obtained from the Orange County Transportation Authority. Traffic for the Highway 57 exit ramp were obtained from the California Department of Transportation. The latest traffic counts available for Ball Road were from 2015. Since this does not represent current conditions, Veneklasen modified the modeled counts to align with the measurements completed at the project site. Once the measured and modeled existing sound levels due to traffic noise matched, the project was assessed. There is an existing 6-foot wall between the project site and sensitive receptors to the north. Client informed Veneklasen that a new 8-foot wall is planned to be installed in order to improve the shielding effect. The planned 8-foot wall at the property line, vacuum canopies, the car wash tunnel itself, along with a new 9-foot tall, 25-foot long wall at the car wash tunnel exit were included in the computer model. The measured sound level data summarized in Table 2 was used to model the car wash equipment. Veneklasen also used published sound power data for the two (2) Carrier 48HC-D08 rooftop units scheduled on the roof of the convenience store. Sound power data for this equipment was taken from Carrier’s published datasheet. Lastly, car idling was included for the queue when entering the car wash tunnel. 4.1 Existing Noise Levels Without Project Figure 2 shows the existing noise levels around the project site due to traffic noise only, primarily caused by traffic flow along Ball Road and Highway 57. The first number at each receiver indicates the noise level at 1st floor, while the second number indicates the noise level at the 2nd floor. Since the 2nd floor of sensitive receptors to the north have direct line of sight to the roadway over the barrier, the noise levels as shown are slightly higher than the 1st floor levels. The levels shown are representative of the property line closest to the convenience store and car wash equipment sources. The levels are further summarized in Table 3. Figure 2 – Predicted Existing Noise Levels, Traffic Only. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 4 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 4 of 10 www.veneklasen.com As can be seen by the results of the model without the project, the existing ambient noise levels as caused by traffic only from Ball Road and the Highway 57 exit ramp are 57 to 60 dBA at the 1st floor and 60 to 66 dBA at the 2nd floor. Per Veneklasen’s interpretation of the Municipal Code in section 2.0, this would establish the maximum allowable level as caused by the convenience store and car wash operations to be 60 to 65 dBA at the 1st floor and 65 to 71 dBA at the 2nd floor. 4.2 Future Noise Levels with the Project Figure 3 shows the predicted sound levels as caused by the proposed convenience store and car wash with planned equipment (vacuums, washers, blowers, rooftop equipment) operational. Within the design, Veneklasen has assumed an 8-foot tall barrier along the back property line, a 9-foot tall, 25-foot long barrier at the exit of the car wash tunnel near the blowers, a 5-foot barrier to shield from future RTUs at the roof of the convenience store, and cars idling at the car wash queue as shown in Figure 3. A summary of the sound levels is also included in Table 3. All inputs utilized for the model can be seen within the various appendices at the end of the report. Figure 3 – Predicted Noise Levels, Traffic and Equipment Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 5 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 5 of 10 www.veneklasen.com Table 3 – Comparison of Modeled Noise Levels with Municipal Code Limits Receiver Floor Modeled Existing Level (Traffic Only), dBA Modeled Future Level (Traffic + Equipment + Car Idling), dBA Municipal Code Noise Level Criterion, dBA Municipal Code Compliance R1 1st 58 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 63 ≤ 65 Yes R2 1st 57 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 63 ≤ 65 Yes R3 1st 57 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 63 ≤ 65 Yes R4 1st 57 58 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 62 ≤ 65 Yes R5 1st 58 58 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 62 61 ≤ 67 Yes R6 1st 58 58 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 63 62 ≤ 68 Yes R7 1st 59 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 64 64 ≤ 69 Yes R8 1st 60 60 ≤ 65 Yes 2nd 66 66 ≤ 71 Yes As can be seen within Figure 3 per the modeling as described, resultant level of the car wash and convenience store operation at all receivers for both the 1st and 2nd floors meets minimum Municipal Code requirements established in Section 3.0. Further, this establishes that the sound levels as contributed by the convenience store and car wash equipment by itself, without the contribution of traffic noise along Ball Road, would be less than or equal to 59 dBA at both the 1st and 2nd floors of the property line. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Veneklasen provides the following comments and conclusions regarding the acoustical study for the addition of the convenience store and car wash as it relates to the noise ordinance within the City of Anaheim Municipal Code: • A 9-foot barrier at approximately 25 feet long should be constructed along the tunnel exit as shown in Figure 3. • An 8-foot barrier should be constructed at the back of the property as shown in Figure 3. • A 5-foot barrier wall should be constructed on the roof of the convenience store as shown in Figure 3 to block line-of-sight to the mechanical equipment. This also aids in shielding from traffic noise. • All barrier walls should be constructed out of a solid material (i.e . no holes, openings, or gaps) with a minimum 2-inch thickness. Given the mitigation measures described herein: • The predicted sound levels at both the 1st and 2nd floor sensitive receptors along the property lines of nearest sensitive receptors are in compliance with the noise ordinance established by the City of Anaheim Municipal Code as shown in Table 3. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 6 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 6 of 10 www.veneklasen.com Therefore, this report finds that the impact on the residences will fall within the noise ordinance per the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The noise at the property line to the north is primarily dominated by existing traffic along Ball Road and the Highway 57 ramp, and modeled levels are compliant with the City’s requirements. Furthermore, the anticipated sound levels per Table 3 represent a worst-case scenario of all equipment in operation simultaneously, and the actual sound levels on-site as caused by the convenience store and car wash are anticipated to be lower than those indicated herein. No further mitigation is required for the project, beyond the barrier walls established herein, to comply with the Municipal Code requirements for noise established by the City of Anaheim, as the construction of the tunnel itself and various barrier utilized in the project’s design provide adequate shielding of noise to nearest receptors to comply with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Veneklasen Associates, Inc. Chris Kezon Elias Montoya Senior Associate Associate Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 7 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 7 of 10 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX A – GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS Term Definition Decibel (dB) A unit describing the amplitude of sound in a logarithmic ratio to a reference value. A-weighted Decibels (dBA) A filter applied to sound pressure levels in decibel to simulate the response of the human ear at the threshold of hearing. A-weighting de-emphasizes the low frequency components of a sound similar to the human ear at these levels. This metric has been closely tied to subjective reactions of annoyance to noise, and is used as a noise metric in this and in many other environmental acoustics reports. In this report, all dBA levels reported refer to the sound pressure level, referenced to 20µPa Sound Pressure Level (Lp) The amplitude of sound compared to the reference value of 20µPa. Sound Pressure Level is what we perceive as audible sound. Sound Pressure Level decreases as distance from the source to the receiver increases. Sound Power Level (Lw) The amplitude of sound compared to the reference value of 1pW. Sound Power Level does not vary with distance, and represents the level of sound emitted by a given source. The sound power level is generally used to model the sound pressure level of a source at a given distance or location. Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) The time-weighted average sound or vibration level for a given period of time. Use of this metric allows the observation of the overall sound level for the measurement period. Maximum Sound Level (Lmax) The instantaneous maximum sound or vibration level of an event. The Lmax can occur over very short periods of time, and fluctuates much more than the Leq due to the presence of intermittent events in the noise environment. Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) The time-weighted noise level representing the noise exposure over a 24-hour period. Noise events that occur within the evening hours (7pm to 10pm) are given a +5dB penalty, and noise events that occur within the nighttime hours (10pm to 7am) are given a +10dB penalty, to account for increased sensitivity to noise during these hours. This metric has units of A-weighted decibels, and has been correlated to probability of annoyance. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 8 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 8 of 10 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX B – EQUIPMENT SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Table 4 – Measured Octave Band Sound Pressure Level for Car Wash Equipment, dB Equipment Distance, ft One-Octave Frequency Band in Hz (dB) Leq Global(dBA) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Blowers 5 58 76 87 96 97 95 88 79 101 Water Sprayers 5 51 64 72 79 82 81 79 75 87 Rotating Brushes 5 40 55 68 74 74 75 71 67 89 Central Vacuum (in) 3 60 68 75 84 85 83 78 70 90 Central Vacuum (out) 3 50 57 65 74 72 71 65 57 78 Vacuum Stations 3 45 49 56 63 69 73 70 64 76 Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 9 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 9 of 10 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX C – MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND ESTIMATED CAR IDLING SOUND POWER LEVELS Table 5 – Octave Band Sound Power Level, dB Equipment One-Octave Frequency Band in Hz (dB) Lw Global(dBA) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Carrier 48HC-D08 90.6 84.3 80.2 79.3 77.1 72.2 67.4 63.7 92 Car idling* 71.3 65.6 59.2 57.8 57.9 56.4 54.3 48.8 63 * Data for car idling obtained from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Median value was selected to represent typical conditions. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 10 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 10 of 10 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX D – TRAFFIC COUNTS Table 6 – Traffic Counts for Modeling Roadway Year of Latest Count AADT Ball Road* 2013 52,000 Sunkist Street* Over 10yrs 14,000 Highway 57 Exit Ramp** 2015 16,756 * Obtained from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) ** Obtained from the California Department of Transportation (CADOT) City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Appendix D.2 – Noise Study Veneklasen Associates Consultants in Acoustics | Noise | Vibration | AV | IT 1711 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica California 90404 • tel: 310.450.1733 • fax: 310.396.3424 • www.veneklasen.com November 25, 2020 Golcheh Group 1180 Beverly Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90035 Attention: Ilan Golcheh | President Subject: East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study VA Project No. 7431-001 Dear Ilan: Veneklasen Associates, Inc. (Veneklasen) was contracted to perform an acoustical study to evaluate the proposed East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash project in Anaheim, California. This study includes an assessment of the existing and future sound levels as caused by traffic, car wash activity, and any mechanical equipment for the convenience store compared to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. This report documents our findings. A list of acoustical terms and their definitions is presented in Appendix A. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following report contains the results of an acoustical study conducted for the East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash in Anaheim, California. The project consists of a future convenience store and car wash which i ncludes mechanical equipment for the convenience store and washing machines, blowers and sprayers for the car wash tunnel. An exterior area with a vacuum system is also included with a canopy structure. The hours of operation will be Monday through Sunday, 7am to 9pm. 2.0 NOISE CRITERIA The City of Anaheim Municipal Code establishes a noise ordinance in Chapter 6.70. This ordinance regulates various types of noise sources and establishes sound level limits for those sources. Section 6.70.010 states the following: “No person shall within the City create any sound radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces a sound pressure level at any point on the property line in excess of sixty [60] decibels…read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. Readings shall be taken in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s instructions, using the slowest meter response.” Section 6.70.010 also states the following: “Traffic sounds, sound created by emergency activities and sound created by governmental units or their contractors shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter.” Veneklasen has interpreted this language to indicate that the levels as caused by the project must not exceed 60 dBA during operation, excluding the influence of any existing traffic noise. Based on this interpretation, traffic noise from Ball Road, Sunkist Street and the Highway 57 exit ramp is not included in the modeling. Only noise generated by the future project itself is taken into account and must comply with the 60 dBA requirement established in the Municipal Code. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 2 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 2 of 7 www.veneklasen.com 3.0 EQUIPMENT SOUND MEASUREMENTS Veneklasen utilized sound measurements conducted for a previous project at an existing Rapid Express Car Wash at 2045 North Tustin Street in Orange, California on July 30, 2019. Measurements were performed on the blowers, water sprayers, rotating brushes and central vacuum. The sound levels for each source were measured independently to determine the levels of each piece of equipment that could be used to incorporate into the computer model. All of the acoustical measurements of the equipment were conducted with an NTi XL2 sound level meter, which conforms to ANSI S.14-1961 for Type 1 precision sound level meters. All measurement equipment was field-calibr ated before use. A summary of measured noise levels from the car wash mechanical equipment is shown in Table 1. Table 1 – Car Wash Equipment Noise Measurement Results Equipment Distance, ft Leq (dBA) Blowers 5 101 Water Sprayers 5 85 Rotating Brushes 5 89 Central Vacuum 3 80 4.0 NOISE MODELING, ANALYSIS, AND RESULTS From the measurement data and provided specifications, Veneklasen has utilized the Brüel & Kjær Predictor computer software program in order to predict sound levels at various locations around the project site. Sound exposure due to the proposed building geometry for the car wash and convenience store was modeled based on drawings provided by the Client. There is an existing 6-foot wall between the project site and sensitive receptors to the north. Client informed Veneklasen that a new 8-foot wall is planned to be installed in order to improve the shielding effect. The planned 8-foot wall at the property line, vacuum canopies, the car wash tunnel itself, along with a new 9-foot tall, 25-foot long wall at the car wash tunnel exit were included in the computer model. The measured sound level data summarized in Table 1 was used to model the car wash equipment. Veneklasen also used published sound power data for the two (2) Carrier 48HC-D08 rooftop units scheduled on the roof of the convenience store. Sound power data for this equipment was taken from Carrier’s published datasheet. Lastly, car idling was included for the queue when entering the car wash tunnel. 4.1 Future Noise Levels with the Project Figure 1 shows the predicted sound levels as caused by the proposed convenience store and car wash with planned equipment (vacuums, washers, blowers, rooftop equipment) operational. As described in section 2.0, traffic noise has been excluded from the modeling since the project is to comply with the City’s 60 dBA requirement without the influence of existing noise sources already present at the site. The first number at each receiver indicates the noise level at 1st floor, while the second number indicates the noise level at the 2nd floor. Since the 2nd floor of sensitive receptors to the north have direct line of sight over the barrier, the noise levels as shown are slightly higher than the 1st floor levels. The levels shown are representative of the property line closest to the convenience store and car wash equipment sources. All modeled levels at sensitive receptors are equal to or lower than the values shown in Figure 1. The levels are further summarized in Table 2. Within the design, Veneklasen has assumed an 8-foot tall barrier along the back property line, a 9-foot tall, 25-foot long barrier at the exit of the car wash tunnel near the blowers, a 5-foot barrier to shield from future RTUs at the roof of the convenience store, and cars idling at the car wash queue as shown in Figure 1. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 3 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 3 of 7 www.veneklasen.com A summary of the sound levels is also included in Table 2. All inputs utilized for the model can be seen within the various appendices at the end of the report. Figure 1 – Predicted Noise Levels with Equipment Table 2 – Comparison of Modeled Noise Levels with Municipal Code Limits Receiver Floor Modeled Future Level (Equipment + Car Idling), dBA Municipal Code Noise Level Criterion, dBA Municipal Code Compliance R1 1st 52 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 56 ≤ 60 Yes R2 1st 54 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 58 ≤ 60 Yes R3 1st 53 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 59 ≤ 60 Yes R4 1st 52 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 57 ≤ 60 Yes R5 1st 51 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 55 ≤ 60 Yes R6 1st 49 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 55 ≤ 60 Yes R7 1st 46 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 53 ≤ 60 Yes R8 1st 49 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 56 ≤ 60 Yes As can be seen within Figure 1 and Table 2 per the modeling as described, resultant noise levels of the car wash and convenience store operation at all receivers for both the 1st and 2nd floors meet minimum Municipal Code requirements of 60 dBA per section 2.0. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 4 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 4 of 7 www.veneklasen.com 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Veneklasen provides the following comments and conclusions regarding the acoustical study for the addition of the convenience store and car wash as it relates to the noise ordinance within the City of Anaheim Municipal Code: • A 9-foot barrier at approximately 25 feet long should be constructed along the tunnel exit as shown in Figure 1. • An 8-foot barrier should be constructed at the back of the property as shown in Figure 1. • A 5-foot barrier wall should be constructed on the roof of the convenience store to block line-of-sight to the mechanical equipment as shown in Figure 1. • All barrier walls should be constructed out of a solid material (i.e. no holes, openings, or gaps) with a minimum 2-inch thickness. Given the mitigation measures described herein: • The predicted sound levels at both the 1st and 2nd floor sensitive receptors along the property lines of nearest sensitive receptors are in compliance with the noise ordinance established by the City of Anaheim Municipal Code as shown in Table 2. Furthermore, the anticipated sound levels per Table 2 represent a worst-case scenario of all equipment in operation simultaneously, and the actual sound levels on-site as caused by the convenience store and car wash are anticipated to be lower than those indicated herein. No further mitigation is required for the project, beyond the barrier walls established herein, to comply with the Municipal Code requirements for noise established by the City of Anaheim, as the construction of the tunnel itself and various barrier utilized in the project’s design provide adequate shielding of noise to nearest receptors to comply with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Veneklasen Associates, Inc. Chris Kezon Elias Montoya Senior Associate Associate Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 5 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 5 of 7 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX A – GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS Term Definition Decibel (dB) A unit describing the amplitude of sound in a logarithmic ratio to a reference value. A-weighted Decibels (dBA) A filter applied to sound pressure levels in decibel to simulate the response of the human ear at the threshold of hearing. A-weighting de-emphasizes the low frequency components of a sound similar to the human ear at these levels. This metric has been closely tied to subjective reactions of annoyance to noise, and is used as a noise metric in this and in many other environmental acoustics reports. In this report, all dBA levels reported refer to the sound pressure level, referenced to 20µPa Sound Pressure Level (Lp) The amplitude of sound compared to the reference value of 20µPa. Sound Pressure Level is what we perceive as audible sound. Sound Pressure Level decreases as distance from the source to the receiver increases. Sound Power Level (Lw) The amplitude of sound compared to the reference value of 1pW. Sound Power Level does not vary with distance, and represents the level of sound emitted by a given source. The sound power level is generally used to model the sound pressure level of a source at a given distance or location. Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) The time-weighted average sound or vibration level for a given period of time. Use of this metric allows the observation of the overall sound level for the measurement period. Maximum Sound Level (Lmax) The instantaneous maximum sound or vibration level of an event. The Lmax can occur over very short periods of time, and fluctuates much more than the Leq due to the presence of intermittent events in the noise environment. Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) The time-weighted noise level representing the noise exposure over a 24-hour period. Noise events that occur within the evening hours (7pm to 10pm) are given a +5dB penalty, and noise events that occur within the nighttime hours (10pm to 7am) are given a +10dB penalty, to account for increased sensitivity to noise during these hours. This metric has units of A-weighted decibels, and has been correlated to probability of annoyance. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 6 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 6 of 7 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX B – EQUIPMENT SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Table 3 – Measured Octave Band Sound Pressure Level for Car Wash Equipment, dB Equipment Distance, ft One-Octave Frequency Band in Hz (dB) Leq Global(dBA) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Blowers 5 58 76 87 96 97 95 88 79 101 Water Sprayers 5 51 64 72 79 82 81 79 75 87 Rotating Brushes 5 40 55 68 74 74 75 71 67 89 Central Vacuum (in) 3 60 68 75 84 85 83 78 70 90 Central Vacuum (out) 3 50 57 65 74 72 71 65 57 78 Vacuum Stations 3 45 49 56 63 69 73 70 64 76 Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 7 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 7 of 7 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX C – MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND ESTIMATED CAR IDLING SOUND POWER LEVELS Table 4 – Octave Band Sound Power Level, dB Equipment One-Octave Frequency Band in Hz (dB) Lw Global(dBA) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Carrier 48HC-D08 90.6 84.3 80.2 79.3 77.1 72.2 67.4 63.7 92 Car idling* 71.3 65.6 59.2 57.8 57.9 56.4 54.3 48.8 63 * Data for car idling obtained from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Median value of all vehicle samples was selected to represent typical conditions, and sound power data wa s calculated based on free-field conditions during the measurements performed by USDOT NHTSA. City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Appendix E – Preliminary Hydrologic Report Comment 0001 - PW Subdivisions (MKomaee) Include and show Q10, 25 and 100-yr flows for both existing and proposed condition in the report with the project's grading plans submittal. Comment 0001 - PW Subdivisions (MKomaee) Include and show Q10, 25 and 100-yr flows for both existing and proposed condition in the report with the project's grading plans submittal. 0001 Comment 0002 - PW Subdivisions (AEftekhari) Preliminary Hydrology is approved. Final Hydrology shall be submitted along with the Final Grading Plan submittal and shall contain calculations for 10, 25 and 100-year flows for both existing and proposed conditions. Comment 0002 - PW Subdivisions (AEftekhari) Preliminary Hydrology is approved. Final Hydrology shall be submitted along with the Final Grading Plan submittal and shall contain calculations for 10, 25 and 100-year flows for both existing and proposed conditions. 0002 07/20/2020 15:06:33 PM #[ OTH2019-01220 ] ANAHEIM 7-ELEVEN PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS: I PURPOSE AND SCOPE II DESIGN METHODOLOGY III DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME CALCULATIONS IV RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATIONS V INLET SIZING DATA VI HABITABLE STRUCTURES PROTECTION VII APPENDIX A – REFERENCE MATERIAL I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This report was prepared in support of the Anaheim 7-Eleven Entitlement package application and Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan. The purpose of this report is to discuss the existing drainage pattern and proposed drainage strategy for the project based on County of Orange Local Drainage Manual requirements and size the on-site Infiltration Storage BMPs based on the calculated Design Capture Volume (DCV) defined in the North Orange County NPDES standards. The proposed project is located on the northeast corner of E. Ball Road and Sunkist Street in the City of Anaheim. The adjacent surrounding streets are existing and a public underground storm drain and curb inlet are located on E. Ball Road along the project frontage. The improvements include demolition of an existing 16,500 s.f. building and adjoining parking lot, as well as construction of a car wash, 7-Eleven convenience store and covered gasoline fueling station. II. DESIGN METHODOLOGY AND CALCULATIONS The 1.90 acre project site is developed in its current condition. Under the existing condition, storm runoff surface flows across the site from the northeast toward the southwest and directly off-site onto E. Ball Road. Under the proposed condition, the amount of impervious area will be reduced and storm runoff will continue to surface flow. However, site grading will be such that the northerly half of the site will tend to direct flows toward the northwesterly side of the property while the southerly half of the site will surface drain in a southwesterly direction. The amount of runoff generated under the proposed condition will be less than that under the existing condition. All on-site surface runoff will be directed toward planter areas that will serve as shallow basin infiltration BMPs. The infiltration BMPs will be sized to store the Design Capture Volume (DCV) defined as the 85th percentile, 24 hour storm event as required City of Anaheim WQMP requirements where feasible. An 0.35 acre unpaved potion of the site will be “self-retaining” and will be able to store the DCV volume tributary to its area without the need to surface flow to a separate infiltration BMP. According to City of Anaheim drainage standards, no surface flows generated during the design storm event are permitted to flow over public sidewalks or driveways. Therefore, an on-site private storm drain system will be designed to capture the peak flows generated during the design storm per City of Anaheim drainage requirements and convey them to an available public storm drain system. Since all surface flows are to be directed to infiltration basin BMPs first, and only overflow generated during the design storm will be collected by the on-site storm drain system, sizing of the private storm drain facilities to collect design storm peak flows may be conservative. However, the on-site storm drain system will be sized accordingly in adherence with City standards nonetheless. Private project runoff that exits the site and enters the public storm drain system is conveyed toward the west and into an Orange County Flood Control District (O.C.F.C.D.) Facility (E12P01, per Orange County Drainage Facility Base Map, Sheet 14). Underground storm drain facility E12P01 carries flows in a southerly direction, along State College Boulevard, connecting to an O.C.F.C.D. underground channel (E12) which flows in a southerly direction and empties into the Santa Ana River. According to the City of Anaheim Drainage Manual for Private Drainage Facilities and Flatland Grading Procedures Exhibit C, all private storm drain facilities with drainage areas less than 640 acres and tributary to the Santa River watershed must be designed for the 25-year design storm frequency. Also, the site design must provide protection so that the storm waters generated during the 100 year design storm frequency event can outlet the site providing a minimum freeboard of 1.0 feet in the event that the on-site storm drain facilities are clogged and fail. The proposed development also includes a car wash and gasoline fueling station. The surfaces of the fueling station pad and the car was interior are “self-treating” areas in that the site will be graded so that no storm runoff will be allowed to enter either of those surface areas. Also, improvements will be designed so that no gasoline spills on the filling station pad or water used in the car wash facility will be allowed to leave either area where they could potentially co-mingle with storm flows. All surface drainage from the filling station pad and car wash will be collected in an underground treatment system where flows will ultimately be directed to the public sewer system. Storm water that lands on the canopy and roof of these facilities will remain separate and be included in storage calculations for on-site storm runoff. A project geotechnical report is not available at this preliminary stage in this project, but will be included in the final drainage report. Although available Orange County Infiltration Study Maps showing NRCS Hydrologic Soils Groups show the project to be in an area where Soil Group ‘A’ exist, the Hydrologic Soil Group for the purposes of this report are assumed to be ‘C’ since the existing site is developed and on-site soils are assumed to be overexcavated and compacted. Section III of this report provides calculations and data quantifying the DCV for six separate on-site Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) (1.55 ac.) and the self-retaining area (0.35 ac.) that make up the portions of the site that generate surface runoff. The “self-retaining area” is an unpaved portion of the proposed develop site located at the extreme east end of the site will not generate surface runoff as it will be designed to store the DCV tributary to its area within a shallow depression (4” minimum). See WQMP-Hydro Map included in the Appendix portion of this report. Section IV of this report provides Rational Method calculations quantifying 10 year, 25-year and 100 year frequency peak flows generated on-site for both the existing and proposed conditions. Rational Method calculations formed using Orange County Hydrology Manual and the Study Form based on rainfall data from figure B-3 and the appropriate calculation shown. Section V of this report provides suggest inlet sizing data for grading design consideration and Section VI discusses habitable building protection for storm waters generated during the 100 year frequency storm event. DESIGN CRITERIA The following parameters were used in the preparation of the calculations provided in this report:  Percent Impervious (Existing) 85%  Percent Impervious (Proposed) 83%  Design Capture Storm Depth 0.90” O.C. TGD Figure XVI-1  Project Site Area 1.90 Acres  Point Precipitation Rainfall Data O.C. Hydrology Manual (Fig. B-3) III. DESIGN CAPTURE AND WATER QUALITY CREDITS CALCULATIONS The infiltration BMPs will be sized to store the Design Capture Volume (DCV) defined as the 85th percentile, 24 hour storm event. The DCV is calculated as follows: DCV = C X d X A X 43,560sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft Where: DCV = Design Capture Volume, cu.ft. C = runoff coefficient = (0.75 X imp + 0.15) imp = impervious fraction of drainage area d = storm depth (inches) A = tributary area The DCV has been calculated for each individual on-site Subarea that drains into a structural source control Infiltration Basin. The shallow infiltration basins range in depth from 1.0’- 1.7’ with 2:1 side slopes (See WQMP-Hydro Map included in the Appendix portion of this report.) The Preliminary Geotechnical Report for the project site indicates that infiltration rates on site can be expected to be in the moderately high range with groundwater deeper than 50ft. Runoff stored in an infiltration basin with a maximum depth of 1.5’ would be evacuated via infiltration in 24 hours assuming an infiltration rate of 0.75”/hr which is a relatively low infiltration rate. Therefore, preliminary indications are that evacuation and storage of collected runoff can be achieved easily on the proposed site. IV. RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATIONS & O.C. STUDY FORM EXISTING CONDITION SUBAREA AREA (SQ.FT.) Q25 FLOWRATE (CFS) E1 0.83 2.21 E2 0.59 1.81 E3 0.18 0.63 E4 0.17 0.65 PROPOSED CONDITION SUBAREA AREA Q25 FLOWRATE (CFS) INLET TYPE FLOWRATE CAPTURED (CFS) INLET 1 0.50 1.43 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 1.43 INLET 2 0.25 0.80 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 0.80 INLET 3 0.21 0.69 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 0.69 INLET 4 0.36 1.12 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 1.12 INLET 5 0.14 0.48 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 0.48 INLET 6 0.09 0.37 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 0.37 Alternatively, the Nyloplast 2ft x 2ft Adjustable Hood combination curb opening/grate inlet offers a reduced footprint, is applicable to the curb adjacent design proposed for this project and provides over 5 CFS of capacity assuming 0.4ft maximum head. For private main line storm drains within private property, the minimum pipe diameter shall be 12 inches and connections to existing catch basins in the City Right of Way shall be 15 inches. Sizing of on-site storm drain conduits will be provided during final design. 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 April 29, 2020 Ex i s t i n g O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 10 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y A p r i l 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 10 . 5 Subarea E1 E1 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 C C o m m 1 0 . 5 2 . 6 5 3 6 4 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 1 . 8 2 3 5 3 5 2 7 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 0 Q ‐E1 8. 3 Subarea E2 E2 0 . 5 9 0 . 5 9 C C o m m 8 . 3 3 . 0 3 6 3 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 1 . 4 9 9 4 6 2 8 1 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 8 Q‐E2 6. 6 Subarea E3 E3 0 . 1 8 0 . 1 8 C C o m m 6 . 6 3 . 4 6 2 4 6 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 5 2 6 4 9 1 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 7 Q‐E3 5. 7 Subarea E4 E4 0 . 1 7 0 . 1 7 C C o m m 5 . 7 3 . 7 6 5 8 8 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 5 4 3 6 7 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 3 Q‐E4 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 1 3 Si t e T o t a l 1. 7 7 1 . 9 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 Existing 10 yr Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Ex i s t i n g 1 0 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e E1 E 2 E 3 E 4 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 8 3 0 . 5 9 0 . 1 8 0 . 1 7 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 7 1 0 . 5 0 0 . 1 5 0 . 1 4 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 1 2 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 3 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 2. 6 5 4 3 . 0 3 6 3 . 4 6 2 3 . 7 6 6 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 1. 8 2 4 1 . 4 9 9 0 . 5 2 6 0 . 5 4 4 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 52 7 2 8 1 1 7 0 1 3 0 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 7 7 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 2. 8 4 5 8 1 . 6 2 9 8 1 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 1 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 3 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 April 29, 2020 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 April 29, 2020 Ex i s t i n g O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 25 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y A p r i l 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 10 . 5 Subarea E1 E1 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 C C o m m 1 0 . 5 3 . 1 6 9 6 2 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 2 . 2 0 8 9 7 5 2 7 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 1 Q ‐E1 8. 3 Subarea E2 E2 0 . 5 9 0 . 5 9 C C o m m 8 . 3 3 . 6 2 0 7 8 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 1 . 8 0 9 8 2 8 1 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 0 Q‐E 2 6. 6 Subarea E3 E3 0 . 1 8 0 . 1 8 C C o m m 6 . 6 4 . 1 2 2 2 9 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 6 3 3 3 9 1 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 1 Q‐E3 5. 7 Subarea E4 E4 0 . 1 7 0 . 1 7 C C o m m 5 . 7 4 . 4 7 8 9 4 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 6 5 2 7 7 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 8 Q‐E4 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 1 3 Si t e T o t a l 1. 7 7 1 . 9 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 Existing 25 yr Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Ex i s t i n g 2 5 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e E1 E 2 E 3 E 4 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 8 3 0 . 5 9 0 . 1 8 0 . 1 7 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 7 1 0 . 5 0 0 . 1 5 0 . 1 4 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 1 2 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 3 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 3. 1 7 0 3 . 6 2 1 4 . 1 2 2 4 . 4 7 9 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 2. 2 0 9 1 . 8 1 0 0 . 6 3 3 0 . 6 5 3 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 52 7 2 8 1 1 7 0 1 3 0 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 7 7 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 2. 8 4 5 8 1 . 6 2 9 8 1 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 1 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 8 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 April 29, 2020 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 April 29, 2020 Ex i s t i n g O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 10 0 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y A p r i l 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 10 . 5 Subarea E1 E1 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 C C o m m 1 0 . 5 4 . 0 4 4 5 3 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 2 . 8 6 2 5 3 5 2 7 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 9 Q ‐E1 8. 3 Subarea E2 E2 0 . 5 9 0 . 5 9 C C o m m 8 . 3 4 . 6 2 7 8 3 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 2 . 3 4 4 5 4 2 8 1 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 1 Q‐E2 6. 6 Subarea E3 E3 0 . 1 8 0 . 1 8 C C o m m 6 . 6 5 . 2 7 7 2 9 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 8 2 0 5 1 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 5 Q‐E 3 5. 7 Subarea E4 E4 0 . 1 7 0 . 1 7 C C o m m 5 . 7 5 . 7 3 9 7 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 8 4 5 6 7 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 1 1 4 Q‐E4 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 1 3 Si t e T o t a l 1. 7 7 1 . 9 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 Existing 100 yr Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Ex i s t i n g 1 0 0 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e E1 E 2 E 3 E 4 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 8 3 0 . 5 9 0 . 1 8 0 . 1 7 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 7 1 0 . 5 0 0 . 1 5 0 . 1 4 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 1 2 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 3 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 4. 0 4 5 4 . 6 2 8 5 . 2 7 7 5 . 7 4 0 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 2. 8 6 3 2 . 3 4 5 0 . 8 2 0 0 . 8 4 6 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 52 7 2 8 1 1 7 0 1 3 0 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 7 7 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 2. 8 4 5 8 1 . 6 2 9 8 1 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 1 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 7 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 1 1 4 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 April 29, 2020 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 April 29, 2020 Pr o p o s e d O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 10 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y A p r i l 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 9. 3 Subarea P1 P1 0 . 5 0 . 5 C C o m m 9 . 3 2 . 8 4 4 7 4 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 1 . 1 8 6 7 6 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 4 Q‐P1 7. 7 Subarea P2 P2 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 C C o m m 7 . 7 3 . 1 6 9 7 4 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 6 6 6 5 2 2 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 1 Q‐P2 7. 5 Subarea P3 P3 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 C C o m m 7 . 5 3 . 2 1 7 9 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 5 6 8 9 7 2 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 2 Q‐P3 8. 1 Subarea P4 P4 0 . 3 6 0 . 3 6 C C o m m 8 . 1 3 . 0 7 9 0 8 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 9 3 0 3 9 2 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 9 Q‐P 4 6. 8 Subarea P5 P5 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 C C o m m 6 . 8 3 . 4 0 3 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 4 0 2 7 3 1 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 6 Q‐P 5 5 Subarea P6 P6 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 9 C C o m m 5 4 . 0 5 9 5 1 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 3 1 2 0 1 6 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 0 Q‐P6 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 3 5 Si t e T o t a l 1. 5 5 1 . 9 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 P r o p o s e d 1 0 y r Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Pr o p o s e d 1 0 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e P1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 P 6 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 1 0 . 3 6 0 . 1 4 0 . 0 9 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 4 2 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 7 0 . 3 0 0 . 1 2 0 . 0 7 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 0 9 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 2 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 2. 8 4 5 3 . 1 7 0 3 . 2 1 8 3 . 0 7 9 3 . 4 0 4 4 . 0 6 0 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 1. 1 8 7 0 . 6 6 7 0 . 5 6 9 0 . 9 3 0 0 . 4 0 3 0 . 3 1 2 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 37 0 2 2 0 2 0 5 2 6 0 1 6 0 6 5 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 1. 8 5 1 . 1 1 . 0 2 5 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 3 2 5 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 0 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 April 29, 2020 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 April 29, 2020 Pr o p o s e d O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 25 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y A p r i l 2 9 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 9. 3 Subarea P1 P1 0 . 5 0 . 5 C C o m m 9 . 3 3 . 3 9 4 9 9 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 1 . 4 3 4 3 7 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 6 Q‐P1 7. 7 Subarea P2 P2 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 C C o m m 7 . 7 3 . 7 7 7 8 7 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 8 0 3 3 3 2 2 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 4 Q‐P 2 7. 5 Subarea P3 P3 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 C C o m m 7 . 5 3 . 8 3 4 5 6 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 6 8 5 5 1 2 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 5 Q‐P 3 8. 1 Subarea P4 P4 0 . 3 6 0 . 3 6 C C o m m 8 . 1 3 . 6 7 1 1 1 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 1 . 1 2 2 2 1 2 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 2 Q‐P 4 6. 8 Subarea P5 P5 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 C C o m m 6 . 8 4 . 0 5 3 2 2 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 4 8 4 5 6 1 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 9 Q‐P 5 5 Subarea P6 P6 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 9 C C o m m 5 4 . 8 2 3 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 3 7 3 9 1 6 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 5 Q‐P6 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 3 5 Si t e T o t a l 1. 5 5 1 . 9 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 P r o p o s e d 2 5 y r Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Pr o p o s e d 2 5 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e P1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 P 6 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 1 0 . 3 6 0 . 1 4 0 . 0 9 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 4 2 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 7 0 . 3 0 0 . 1 2 0 . 0 7 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 0 9 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 2 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 3. 3 9 5 3 . 7 7 8 3 . 8 3 5 3 . 6 7 1 4 . 0 5 3 4 . 8 2 4 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 1. 4 3 4 0 . 8 0 3 0 . 6 8 6 1 . 1 2 2 0 . 4 8 5 0 . 3 7 4 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 37 0 2 2 0 2 0 5 2 6 0 1 6 0 6 5 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 1. 8 5 1 . 1 1 . 0 2 5 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 3 2 5 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 5 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 April 29, 2020 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 April 29, 2020 Pr o p o s e d O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 10 0 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y April 29, 2020 Co n c e n t r a t i o n So i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . Notes 9. 3 Subarea P1 P1 0 . 5 0 . 5 C C o m m 9. 3 4 . 3 3 5 8 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 1 . 8 5 7 7 3 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 5 Q‐P1 7. 7 Subarea P2 P2 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 C C o m m 7. 7 4 . 8 3 1 1 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 1 . 0 4 0 3 2 2 2 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 6 Q‐P 2 7. 5 Subarea P3 P3 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 C C o m m 7. 5 4 . 9 0 4 5 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 8 8 7 7 4 2 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 7 Q‐P 3 8. 1 Subarea P4 P4 0 . 3 6 0 . 3 6 C C o m m 8. 1 4 . 6 9 2 9 7 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 1 . 4 5 3 2 9 2 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 3 Q‐P 4 6. 8 Subarea P5 P5 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 C C o m m 6. 8 5 . 1 8 7 7 9 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 6 2 7 5 2 1 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 3 Q‐P 5 5 Subarea P6 P6 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 9 C C o m m 5 6 . 1 8 7 2 8 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 4 8 4 3 6 6 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 1 2 4 Q‐P6 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 3 5 Si t e T o t a l 1. 5 5 1 . 9 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 Proposed 100 yr Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Pr o p o s e d 1 0 0 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e P1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 P 6 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 1 0 . 3 6 0 . 1 4 0 . 0 9 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 4 2 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 7 0 . 3 0 0 . 1 2 0 . 0 7 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 0 9 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 2 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 4. 3 3 6 4 . 8 3 1 4 . 9 0 5 4 . 6 9 3 5 . 1 8 8 6 . 1 8 7 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 1. 8 5 8 1 . 0 4 0 0 . 8 8 8 1 . 4 5 3 0 . 6 2 8 0 . 4 8 4 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 37 0 2 2 0 2 0 5 2 6 0 1 6 0 6 5 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 1. 8 5 1 . 1 1 . 0 2 5 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 3 2 5 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 1 2 4 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 April 29, 2020 V. INLET SIZING DATA Inlet capacity and sizing data is provided for common foundry type grated inlet types placed adjacent to curbs as well as Nyloplast type combination curb opening/grate inlets. The maximum ponding in each case is assumed to be 0.4ft. Inlet type recommendations are provided in this Preliminary Hydrologic Report for use in preparing the Preliminary Grading Design. The actual type of inlet facility will be determine during final design and shown on the Precise Grading Improvement Plan. VI. HABITABLE STRUCTURES PROTECTION The proposed on-site private storm drain design includes the use of storm drain inlets designed to operate with a maximum ponding depth of 0.4’ in a sump condition. Assuming that the proposed storm drain system fails due to clogging, ponding can be expected to occur at driveway entrances where ridge lines are required based on City of Anaheim Grading requirements and at each of the on-site storm drain inlet locations. During a failure of the on-site storm drain system, ponding would reach a maximum elevation of 102.0 at storm drain inlet 1 shown on the Anaheim 7-Eleven Hydrology Map included in the Appendix of this report. The proposed habitable 7-Eleven building is proposed to have a finish floor elevation of 103.10 providing 1.0 feet of freeboard. VII APPENDIX – REFERENCE MATERIAL ORAN G E C O U N T Y ORAN G E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y 1. 0 5 0. 7 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.95 0 . 7 0 . 9 0. 9 0.75 P : \ 9 5 2 6 E \ 6 - G I S \ M x d s \ R e p o r t s \ I n f i l t r a t i o n F e a s a b i l i t y _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 \ 9 5 2 6 E _ F i g u r e X V I - 1 _ R a i n f a l l Z o n e s _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 . m x d FIGUREJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 miles DESIGNED DRAWING CHECKEDBMP04/22/10 DATE JOB NO.9526-E TH THORANGE COUNTY TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ORANGE CO.CARAINFALL ZONES SU B J E C T T O F U R T H E R R E V I S I O N 03 .67 .2 1. 8 Mi l e s 06 1 2 3 Ki l o m e t e r s LEGEND Orange County Precipitation Stations 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches)24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) - Extrapolated City Boundaries Rainfall Zones Design Capture Storm Depth (inches)0.65"0.7 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.10"Note: Events defined as 24-hour periods (calendar days) with gr eater than 0.1 inches of rainfall. For areas outside of available data coverage, professional judg ment shall be applied.XVI-1 City of Anaheim 2501-2525 E. Ball Road DEV2019-00042 Class 32 Exemption Appendix F - Preliminary Hydrologic Report Golcheh Group Table of Contents Page iii Contents Page No. Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance .......... 1 Section II Project Description .................................................................................. 3 Section III Site Description ........................................................................................ 8 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) ...................................................... 11 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs ................................ 27 Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) .......................................................................... 31 Section VII Educational Materials ............................................................................ 32 Appendices A.................. Operation and Maintenance Plan B.................. Infiltration Feasibility C. ................. BMP Site Plan D. ................ BMP Fact Sheets E. ................. Geotechnical Report F. ................. Preliminary Hydrology Report G. ................ Exhibits Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section I Page 1 Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance Provide discretionary or grading/building permit information and water quality conditions of approval, or permit issuance, applied to the project. If conditions are unknown, please request applicable conditions from staff. Refer to Section 2.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) available on the OC Planning website (ocplanning.net). Project Infomation Permit/Application No. (If applicable) OTH2019-01218 Grading or Building Permit No. (If applicable) Address of Project Site (or Tract Map and Lot Number if no address) and APN 2507 E. Ball Rd, Anaheim, CA 92806 Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance applied to this project. (Please list verbatim.) Conditions of Approval have not yet been applied Conceptual WQMP Was a Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan previously approved for this project? N/A Watershed-Based Plan Conditions Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section I Page 2 Provide applicable conditions from watershed - based plans including WIHMPs and TMDLS. Conditions of Approval have not yet been applied Golcheh Group Section II Page 3 Section II Project Description II.1 Project Description Provide a detailed project description including:  Project areas;  Land uses;  Land cover;  Design elements;  A general description not broken down by drainage management areas (DMAs). Include attributes relevant to determining applicable source controls. Refer to Section 2.2 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for information that must be included in the project description. Description of Proposed Project Development Category (From Model WQMP, Table 7.11-2; or - 3): 8. All significant redevelopment projects, where significant redevelopment is defined as the addition of 5,000 or more square feet of impervious surface on an already developed site, and the existing development or redevelopment project falls under another Priority Project Category. If the redevelopment results in the addition or replacement of less than 50 percent of the impervious area on-site and the existing development was not subject to WQMP requirement, the numeric sizing criteria discuss below only applies to the addition or replacement area. If the addition or replacement accounts for 50 percent or more of the impervious area, the Project WQMP requirements apply to the entire development. 9. Retail Gasoline Outlets (RGOs). This category includes RGOs that meet the following criteria: (a) 5,000 square feet or more, or (b) a projected Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 100 or more vehicles per day. Project Area (ft2): 75,465 Number of Dwelling Units: 0 SIC Code: 5541 Project Area Pervious Impervious Area (acres or sq ft) Percentage Area (acres or sq ft) Percentage Pre-Project Conditions 0.29 17% 1.43 83% Post-Project 0.28 16% 1.44 84% Golcheh Group Section II Page 4 Conditions Narrative Project Description: The proposed project is located on the northeast corner of E. Ball Road and Sunkist Street in the City of Anaheim. The improvements include demolition of an existing 16,500 s.f. building and adjoining parking lot, as well as construction of a car wash, 7-Eleven convenience store and covered gasoline fueling station. Drainage Patterns/Connec tions The primary site treatment BMP for the proposed project will be depressed landscaped planter areas that will serve as bio-retention and bio-infiltration BMPs. The BMPs will be sized to capture the Design Capture Volume (DCV), quantified in this report. When the capacity of the on-site BMP systems is exceeded, runoff will exit the southwesterly corner of the site and flow onto E. Ball Road and into an existing public storm drain. Once the project runoff exits the site and enters the public storm drain system, it is conveyed toward the west and into an Orange County Flood Control District (O.C.F.C.D.) Facility (E12P01, per Orange County Drainage Facility Base Map, Sheet 14). Underground storm drain facility E12P01 carries flows in a southerly direction, along State College Boulevard, connecting to an O.C.F.C.D. underground channel (E12) which flows in a southerly direction and empties into the Santa Ana River. The proposed development also includes a car wash and gasoline fueling station. The surfaces of the fueling station pad and the car was interior are “self-treating” areas in that the site will be graded so that no storm runoff will be allowed to enter either of those surface areas. Also, improvements will be designed so that no gasoline spills on the filling station pad or water used in the car wash facility will be allowed to leave either area where they could potentially co-mingle with storm flows. All surface drainage from the filling station pad and car wash will be collected in an underground treatment system where flows will ultimately be directed to the public sewer system. Storm water that lands on the canopy and roof of these facilities will remain separate and be included in storage calculations for on-site storm runoff. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section II Page 5 II.2 Potential Stormwater Pollutants Determine and list expected stormwater pollutants based on land uses and site activities. Refer to Section 2.2.2 and Table 2.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for guidance. Pollutants of Concern Pollutant Check One for each: E=Expected to be of concern N=Not Expected to be of concern Additional Information and Comments Suspended-Solid/ Sediment E N Nutrients E N Heavy Metals E N Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) E N Pesticides E N Oil and Grease E N Toxic Organic Compounds E N Trash and Debris E N Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section II Page 6 II.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Determine if streams located downstream from the project area are potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts. Refer to Section 2.2.3.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for North Orange County or Section 2.2.3.2 for South Orange County. No – See Susceptibility Analysis Santa Ana River Map - Exhibit Appendix Folder Yes – Describe applicable hydrologic conditions of concern below. Refer to Section 2.2.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD).  The portion of the Santa Ana River downstream from the project site is not potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts and therefore hydromodification controls are not required.  The drainage patterns for the proposed site condition are similar to those under the existing condition. However, the proposed condition minimally increases the amount of impervious surface drainage area. A portion of the proposed site will be pervious self mitigating drainage management area. Pre-development Impervious Area = 83% Post Development Impervious Area = 84% Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section II Page 7 II.4 Post Development Drainage Characteristics Describe post development drainage characteristics. Refer to Section 2.2.4 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). The primary site treatment BMP for the proposed project will be depressed landscaped planter areas that will serve as bio-retention and bio-infiltration BMPs. The infiltration BMPs will be sized to capture the Design Capture Volume (DCV), quantified in this report. When the capacity of the on-site infiltration basins is exceeded, runoff will exit the southwesterly corner of the site and flow onto E. Ball Road and into an existing public storm drain. Once the project runoff exits the site and enters the public storm drain system, it is conveyed toward the west and into an Orange County Flood Control District (O.C.F.C.D.) Facility (E12P01, per Orange County Drainage Facility Base Map, Sheet 14). Underground storm drain facility E12P01 carries flows in a southerly direction, along State College Boulevard, connecting to an O.C.F.C.D. underground channel (E12) which flows in a southerly direction and empties into the Santa Ana River. The infiltration BMPs are such that they accept on-site surface runoff through evenly spaced curb openings in order to restrict flow so that only low flows are intercepted in an off-line system design. During high flow scenarios, the infiltration BMP system is bypassed. High flows that bypass the Infiltration BMP system are directed to an on-site drainage collection system designed to capture runoff generated during the 25 year storm event. Flows that exceed the capacity of the online collection system exist the site on to the Public ROW in a manner that is adheres to City of Anaheim standards. II.5 Property Ownership/Management Describe property ownership/management. Refer to Section 2.2.5 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). The property will be privately owned by Golcheh Group. Information regarding the management team is not available at this early stage of the project. Golcheh Group Section III Page 8 Section III Site Description III.1 Physical Setting Fill out table with relevant information. Refer to Section 2.3.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Name of Planned Community/Planning Area (if applicable) N/A Location/Address 2507 E. Ball Road Anaheim, CA 92806 General Plan Land Use Designation General Commercial Zoning General Commercial Acreage of Project Site 1.72 acres Predominant Soil Type Soil Group A (See Soil Group Map in Appendices) III.2 Site Characteristics Fill out table with relevant information and include information regarding BMP sizing, suitability, and feasibility, as applicable. Refer to Section 2.3.2 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Site Characteristics Precipitation Zone 0.90 (See Rainfall Zones Map in Exhibits Appendix) Topography The project site is developed in its current commercial use condition. Grades in the existing and propose conditions will be relatively flat to facilitate vehicular on-site traffic. Curb, gutter and sidewalk exists on Golcheh Group Section III Page 9 the westerly and southerly perimeter and will remain in place. Drainage Patterns/Connections Storm runoff under the existing and proposed condition surface flow across the 1.72 acres site generally from the east toward the west. Under the proposed condition, surface runoff will be directed toward shallow basin infiltration BMPs. Once the Design Capture Volume is exceeded, stored runoff will overflow the infiltration basins, leaving the site. Soil Type, Geology, and Infiltration Properties Soil Type A - Moderate to high infiltration rates are anticipated based on the project Geological Report. (See Report in Appendix) Hydrogeologic (Groundwater) Conditions Depth to groundwater is 50’ based on the North Orange County Mapped Depth to First Groundwater Exhibit (see Exhibit Included in Appendix). The State Water Resources Control Board’s database system (Geotracker), showed no LUST cleanup sites within 250ft of the project site. See Geotracker Report Sheet, Table 2.7 and Worksheet I in Appendix B. Geotechnical Conditions (relevant to infiltration) Moderate to high infiltration rates are anticipated based on the project Geological Report. (See Report in Appendix). In the absence of project specific infiltration test results, an assumed infiltration rate of 0.3 in/hr will be used when calculating estimated drawdown times in the proposed BMP systems. Off-Site Drainage The site is not subject to receiving off-site flows. Storm Runoff on E. Ball Road on the project frontage and Sunkist Street, enter an underground storm drain system on E. Ball Road where they are conveyed toward an O.C.F.C.D. underground facility (E12P01). E12P01 carries storm flow south to its connection with E12, which ultimately empties into Santa Ana River. Utility and Infrastructure Information The project site does not proposed underground storm drain facilities on site. On-site utilities are expected to be limited to private wet and dry services. A public utility easement and several public utilities exist along the project perimeter in the public right of way. Golcheh Group Section III Page 10 Receiving Waters Santa Ana River, Huntington Beach State Park 303(d) Listed Impairments Other Organics Applicable TMDLs None Pollutants of Concern for the Project Suspended Solids, Nutrients, Heavy Metals, Pathogens, Pesticides, Oil and Grease, Toxic Organic Compounds, Trash & Debris Environmentally Sensitive and Special Biological Significant Areas There are no Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) or areas of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) within the project site or within the project’s vicinity. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 11 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) IV. 1 Project Performance Criteria Describe project performance criteria. Several steps must be followed in order to determine what performance criteria will apply to a project. These steps include:  If the project has an approved WIHMP or equivalent, then any watershed specific criteria must be used and the project can evaluate participation in the approved regional or sub- regional opportunities. (Please ask your assigned planner or plan checker regarding whether your project is part of an approved WIHMP or equivalent.)  Determine applicable hydromodification control performance criteria. Refer to Section 7.II- 2.4.2.2 of the Model WQMP.  Determine applicable LID performance criteria. Refer to Section 7.II-2.4.3 of the Model WQMP.  Determine applicable treatment control BMP performance criteria. Refer to Section 7.II-3.2.2 of the Model WQMP.  Calculate the LID design storm capture volume for the project. Refer to Section 7.II-2.4.3 of the Model WQMP. (NOC Permit Area only) Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent LID feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing LID on regional or sub-regional basis? YES NO If yes, describe WIHMP feasibility criteria or regional/sub-regional LID opportunities. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 12 Project Performance Criteria If HCOC exists, list applicable hydromodification control performance criteria (Section 7.II-2.4.2.2 in MWQMP) The portion of the Santa Ana River downstream from the project site is not potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts and therefore hydromodification controls are not required. List applicable LID performance criteria (Section 7.II-2.4.3 from MWQMP) Priority projects must infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire, or biotreat/biofilter, the 85th percentile, 24 hour storm event (Design Capture Volume). List applicable treatment control BMP performance criteria (Section 7.II-3.2.2 from MWQMP) If it is not feasible to meet LID performance criteria through retention and/or biotreatment provided on-site or at a sub- regional/regional scale, then treatment control BMPs shall be provided on-site or off-site prior to discharge to waters of the U.S. Sizing of treatment control BMPs shall be based on either the unmet volume after claiming applicable water quality credits, if appropriate. Calculate LID design storm capture volume for Project. DCV = C X d X A X 43,560sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft Where: DCV = Design Capture Volume, cu.ft. imp = impervious fraction of drainage area = 0.84 d = storm depth (inches) = 0.90 (TGD Fig. XVI-1) C = runoff coefficient = (0.75 X imp + 0.15) = (0.75 X 0.84)+0.15 = 0.78 A = tributary area = 1.72 DCV =0.77 X 0.90 X 1.72 X 43,560/12 = 4,383 c.f. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 13 IV.2. Site Design and Drainage Describe site design and drainage including  A narrative of site design practices utilized or rationale for not using practices;  A narrative of how site is designed to allow BMPs to be incorporated to the MEP  A table of DMA characteristics and list of LID BMPs proposed in each DMA.  Reference to the WQMP “BMP Exhibit.”  Calculation of Design Capture Volume (DCV) for each drainage area.  A listing of GIS coordinates for LID and Treatment Control BMPs. Refer to Section 2.4.2 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). The proposed project site is intended for commercial use and is separated into seven separate Drainage Management Areas (DMAs). Given the relatively small sized of the proposed project area, shallow planter bioretention and bioinfiltration BMPs (INF-3, INF-4, Appendix D) are proposed for six of the seven on-site DMAs as they can provide 100% of the Design Capture Volume needed. DMA 7 (see WQMP BMP Site Plan – Appendix C) is 100% pervious and self-treating with an area of 0.09 acres. The Design Capture Volume for DMA 7 can be calculated as follows: imp = impervious fraction of drainage area = 0.00 C = (0.75 X imp) + 0.15 = (0.75 X 0.00) + 0.15 = 0.15 A = tributary area = 0.09 acres DCV = 0.15 X 0.90 X 0.09 X 43,560 sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft = 44 c.f. Assuming that 1” of depth over the 100% pervious area can be provided, the self-treating volume provided is: A = 0.09 acres = 0.09 X 43,560 s.f. = 3,920 s.f. d(depth) = 1” = 0.083’ Self-treating volume = A X d = 3,920 s.f. X 0.083’ = 325 c.f. Surface runoff in low flow scenarios will be directed to bioretention and bioinfiltration BMPs located around the site perimeter. Runoff that bypasses the off-line BMPs in high flow scenarios will be collected by an on-site storm drain system. According to City of Anaheim drainage standards, no surface flows generated during the design storm event are permitted to flow over public sidewalks or driveways. Therefore, an on-site private storm drain system will be designed to capture the peak flows generated during the 25 year design storm per City of Anaheim drainage requirements and convey them to an available public storm drain system. See the WQMP BMP Site Exhibit in Appendix C. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 15 IV.3 LID BMP Selection and Project Conformance Analysis Each sub-section below documents that the proposed design features conform to the applicable project performance criteria via check boxes, tables, calculations, narratives, and/or references to worksheets. Refer to Section 2.4.2.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for selecting LID BMPs and Section 2.4.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for conducting conformance analysis with project performance criteria. IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls (HSCs) If required HSCs are included, fill out applicable check box forms. If the retention criteria are otherwise met with other LID BMPs, include a statement indicating HSCs not required. Name Included? Localized on-lot infiltration Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top disconnection) Street trees (canopy interception) Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) Green roofs/Brown roofs Blue roofs Impervious area reduction (e.g. permeable pavers, site design) Other: Retention criteria is met by including infiltration BMPs sized to capture the Design Capture Volume. Hydrologic Source Controls (HSCs) are not required as part of this project. IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs Identify infiltration BMPs to be used in project. If design volume cannot be met, state why. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 16 Name Included? Bioretention without underdrains Rain gardens Porous landscaping Infiltration planters Retention swales Infiltration trenches Infiltration basins Drywells Subsurface infiltration galleries French drains Permeable asphalt Permeable concrete Permeable concrete pavers Other: Other: Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 17 The DCV for each of the on-site Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) using Infiltration BMPs are calculated as follows: DMA 1 imp = impervious fraction of drainage area = 0.83 C = (0.75 X imp) + 0.15 = (0.75 X 0.83) + 0.15 = 0.77 A = tributary area = 0.52 acres DCV = 0.77 X 0.90 X 0.52 X 43,560 sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft = 1,258 c.f. DMA 2 imp = impervious fraction of drainage area = 0.78 C = (0.75 X imp) + 0.15 = (0.75 X 0.78) + 0.15 = 0.74 A = tributary area = 0.29 acres DCV = 0.74 X 0.90 X 0.29 X 43,560 sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft = 701 c.f. DMA 3 imp = impervious fraction of drainage area = 0.86 C = (0.75 X imp) + 0.15 = (0.75 X 0.86) + 0.15 = 0.80 A = tributary area = 0.21 acres DCV = 0.80 X 0.90 X 0.21 X 43,560 sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft = 550 c.f. DMA 4 imp = impervious fraction of drainage area = 0.87 C = (0.75 X imp) + 0.15 = (0.75 X 0.87) + 0.15 = 0.80 A = tributary area = 0.38 acres DCV = 0.80 X 0.90 X 0.38 X 43,560 sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft = 993 c.f. DMA 5 imp = impervious fraction of drainage area = 0.82 C = (0.75 X imp) + 0.15 = (0.75 X 0.82) + 0.15 = 0.77 A = tributary area = 0.17 acres DCV = 0.77 X 0.90 X 0.17 X 43,560 sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft = 428 c.f. DMA 6 imp = impervious fraction of drainage area = 0.67 C = (0.75 X imp) + 0.15 = (0.75 X 0.67) + 0.15 = 0.65 A = tributary area = 0.06 acres DCV = 0.65 X 0.90 X 0.06 X 43,560 sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft = 127 c.f. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 18 Bioretention Basin without Underdrain (INF-3) BMP Sizing Based on the DCV for each DMA using a Bioretention Basin (INF-3) BMP, the BMP design volume is calculated as follows: K(design) = 0.3 in/hr (assumed) n(media) = planting media porosity = 0.20 (per BMP guidelines) n(gravel) = gravel porosity = 0.35 d48(drawdown) = K(design) X 4, ft. = 0.3 X 4 = 1.2’ The BMP will be designed with an effective a depth less than or equal to 1.2 ft. deep: 6” ponding 18” planting media (includes 3” top layer of mulch) – n(media) = 0.20 porosity 12” gravel – n(gravel) = 0.35 porosity d(effective) = 6” + 18”(0.20) + 12”(0.35) = 1.15’ < 1.2’ Infiltrating Volume = Infiltrating Area X d(effective) - Each BMP has maximum side slopes of 3:1 - The effective width of all Bioretention BMPs used on site is 6’ (bottom only) DMA 1 Infiltrating Area – 6’ X 215’ = 1,290 s.f. Infiltrating Volume = 1,290 s.f. X 1.15’ = 1,483 c.f. DMA 2 Infiltrating Area – 6’ X 186’ = 1,116 s.f. Infiltrating Volume = 1,116 s.f. X 1.15’ = 1,283 c.f. DMA 4 Infiltrating Area – 6’ X 151’ = 906 s.f. Infiltrating Volume = 906 s.f. X 1.15’ = 1,042 c.f. DMA 5 Infiltrating Area – 6’ X 70’ = 420 s.f. Infiltrating Volume = 420 s.f. X 1.15’ = 483 c.f. DMA 6 Infiltrating Area – 6’ X 26’ = 156 s.f. Infiltrating Volume = 156 s.f. X 1.15’ = 179 c.f. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 19 Bioinfiltration Planter (INF-4) BMP Sizing Based on the DCV for DMA 3 using a Bioinfiltration Planter Basin (INF-4) BMP, the BMP design volume is calculated as follows: The gravel layer is designed with enough depth to provide sufficient bioinfiltration. The gravel layer is designed to drawdown in not less than 48 hours. K(design) = 0.3 in/hr (assumed) n(gravel) = gravel porosity = 0.35 d(gravel) = gravel depth DD(gravel) = gravel draw down, hours = ([d(gravel) X n(gravel)]/K(design)) X 12 Set DD(gravel) = 48 hours and solve for d(gravel): d(gravel) = [DD(gravel) X K(design)]/[n(gravel) X 12] = (48 X 0.3)/(0.35 X 12) = 3.4’ 6” ponding 18” planting media (includes 3” top layer of mulch) – n(media) = 0.20 porosity 3.4’ gravel – n(gravel) = 0.35 porosity d(effective) = 6” + 18”(0.20) + 3.4”(0.35) = 1.99’ - The BMP has maximum side slopes of 3:1 - The effective width of all Bioretention BMPs used on site is 6’ (bottom only) DMA 3 Infiltrating Area – 6’ X 48’ = 288 s.f. Infiltrating Volume = 288 s.f. X 1.99’ = 559 c.f. Drawdown Drawdown time is used as the basis for calculating the volume of each bioretention and bioinfiltration BMP. A infiltration rate of 0.3 in/hr has been assumed for design sizing purposes. Infiltration Infeasibility Screening has been conducted for each BMP used. Please see Table 2.7 and Worksheet I, Appendix B Infiltration Feasibility. IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs If the full Design Storm Capture Volume cannot be met with infiltration BMPs, describe any evapotranspiration and/or rainwater harvesting BMPs included. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 20 Name Included? All HSCs; See Section IV.3.1 Surface-based infiltration BMPs Biotreatment BMPs Above-ground cisterns and basins Underground detention Other: Other: Other: Show calculations below to demonstrate if the LID Design Storm Capture Volume can be met with evapotranspiration and/or rainwater harvesting BMPs in combination with infiltration BMPs. If not, document below how much can be met with either infiltration BMPs, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting BMPs, or a combination, and document why it is not feasible to meet the full volume with these BMP categories. N/A IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs If the full Design Storm Capture Volume cannot be met with infiltration BMPs, and/or evapotranspiration and rainwater harvesting BMPs, describe biotreatment BMPs included. Include sections for selection, suitability, sizing, and infeasibility, as applicable. Name Included? Bioretention with underdrains Stormwater planter boxes with underdrains Rain gardens with underdrains Constructed wetlands Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 21 Vegetated swales Vegetated filter strips Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems Wet extended detention basin Dry extended detention basins Other: Other: Show calculations below to demonstrate if the LID Design Storm Capture Volume can be met with infiltration, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting and/or biotreatment BMPs. If not, document how much can be met with either infiltration BMPs, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting BMPs, or a combination, and document why it is not feasible to meet the full volume with these BMP categories. N/A IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs Describe hydromodification control BMPs. See Section 5 of the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Include sections for selection, suitability, sizing, and infeasibility, as applicable. Detail compliance with Prior Conditions of Approval (if applicable). Hydromodification Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description N/A Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 22 IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs Describe regional/sub-regional LID BMPs in which the project will participate. Refer to Section 7.II- 2.4.3.2 of the Model WQMP. Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs N/A IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs Treatment control BMPs can only be considered if the project conformance analysis indicates that it is not feasible to retain the full design capture volume with LID BMPs. Describe treatment control BMPs including sections for selection, sizing, and infeasibility, as applicable. Treatment Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description N/A Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 23 IV.3.8 Non-structural Source Control BMPs Fill out non-structural source control check box forms or provide a brief narrative explaining if non- structural source controls were not used. Non-Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants N2 Activity Restrictions N3 Common Area Landscape Management N4 BMP Maintenance N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How development will comply) N6 Local Industrial Permit Compliance This project does not propose an Industrial Use. N7 Spill Contingency Plan N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation N11 Common Area Litter Control N12 Employee Training N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks No loading docks are included as part of the on-site design. N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection No catch basins are included in the on-site design. N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots N16 Retail Gasoline Outlets Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 24 IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs Fill out structural source control check box forms or provide a brief narrative explaining if structural source controls were not used. Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable S1 Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage No storm drain facilities are included in the on-site design. S2 Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction The commercial site is limited in size and outdoor material storage will not be required. S3 Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction S4 Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control S5 Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation No slopes over 1ft in height exist on-site. Incorporate requirements applicable to individual priority project categories (from SDRWQCB NPDES Permit) S6 Dock areas No docks will exist on-site. S7 Maintenance bays No maintenance bays will exist on-site. S8 Vehicle wash areas S9 Outdoor processing areas No outdoor food processing areas will be included on-site S10 Equipment wash areas S11 Fueling areas S12 Hillside landscaping No hillsides will exist on-site S13 Wash water control for food preparation areas No outdoor food preparation areas will be included on-site. S14 Community car wash racks Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 25 IV.4 Alternative Compliance Plan (If Applicable) Describe an alternative compliance plan (if applicable). Include alternative compliance obligations (i.e., gallons, pounds) and describe proposed alternative compliance measures. Refer to Section 7.II 3.0 in the WQMP. IV.4.1 Water Quality Credits Determine if water quality credits are applicable for the project. Refer to Section 3.1 of the Model WQMP for description of credits and Appendix VI of the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for calculation methods for applying water quality credits. Description of Proposed Project Project Types that Qualify for Water Quality Credits (Select all that apply): Redevelopment projects that reduce the overall impervious footprint of the project site. Brownfield redevelopment, meaning redevelopment, expansion, or reuse of real property which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants, and which have the potential to contribute to adverse ground or surface WQ if not redeveloped. Higher density development projects which include two distinct categories (credits can only be taken for one category): those with more than seven units per acre of development (lower credit allowance); vertical density developments, for example, those with a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 2 or those having more than 18 units per acre (greater credit allowance). Mixed use development, such as a combination of residential, commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or other land uses which incorporate design principles that can demonstrate environmental benefits that would not be realized through single use projects (e.g. reduced vehicle trip traffic with the potential to reduce sources of water or air pollution). Transit-oriented developments, such as a mixed use residential or commercial area designed to maximize access to public transportation; similar to above criterion, but where the development center is within one half mile of a mass transit center (e.g. bus, rail, light rail or commuter train station). Such projects would not be able to take credit for both categories, but may have greater credit assigned Redevelopment projects in an established historic district, historic preservation area, or similar significant city area including core City Center areas (to be defined through mapping). Developments with dedication of undeveloped portions to parks, preservation areas and other pervious uses. Developments in a city center area. Developments in historic districts or historic preservation areas. Live-work developments, a variety of developments designed to support residential and vocational needs together – similar to criteria to mixed use development; would not be able to take credit for both categories. In-fill projects, the conversion of empty lots and other underused spaces into more beneficially used spaces, such as residential or commercial areas. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section IV Page 26 Calculation of Water Quality Credits (if applicable) N/A IV.4.2 Alternative Compliance Plan Information Describe an alternative compliance plan (if applicable). Include alternative compliance obligations (i.e., gallons, pounds) and describe proposed alternative compliance measures. Refer to Section 7.II 3.0 in the Model WQMP. Golcheh Group Section V Page 27 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs Fill out information in table below. Prepare and attach an Operation and Maintenance Plan. Identify the funding mechanism through which BMPs will be maintained. Inspection and maintenance records must be kept for a minimum of five years for inspection by the regulatory agencies. Refer to Section 7.II 4.0 in the Model WQMP. BMP Inspection/Maintenance BMP Reponsible Party(s) Inspection/ Maintenance Activities Required Minimum Frequency of Activities Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Owner RP will insure that all owners & tenants will be given a copy of the recorded CC&R’s which will contain a section outlining the environmental awareness education materials at the close of escrow. RP shall distribute appropriate materials to owners, tenants and/or occupants via contract language, mailings, website or meeting. Brochures can be requested or downloaded from www.ocwatersheds.com. Brochures and educational articles for RP distribution can also be requested from City Water Quality Engineer. Information to be initially provided to owners & tenants upon sale or lease agreement. Educational materials will be provided to owners and/or tenants annually, thereafter. Activity Restrictions Owner Within the CC&R’s or lease agreement, the following activity restrictions shall be enforced:  Prohibit discharges of fertilizer, pesticides, or animal wastes to streets or storm drains.  Prohibit blowing or sweeping of debris (leaf litter, grass clippings, litter, etc.) into streets or storm Continuous Golcheh Group Section V Page 28 drains.  Keep dumpster lids closed at all times.  Prohibit discharges of paint or masonry wastes to streets or storm drains.  Restrict vehicle washing, maintenance, or repair on the premises designated areas. Common Area Landscape Management & Efficient Landscape Design Owner Landscape Management Includes:  Mitigation of the potential dangers of fertilizer and pesticide usage through the incorporation of an Integrated Pest Management Program (IPM).  Monitor for runoff and efficiency regularly.  Implementation of a water budget.  Irrigation systems shall be automatically controlled and designed, installed, and maintained so as to minimize overspray and runoff onto streets, sidewalks, driveways, structures, windows, walls, and fences.  Use of native and drought tolerant species when replanting Inspected per week. Common Area Litter Control Owner Weekly sweeping and trash pick up as necessary within all project areas and common landscape areas. Daily inspection of trash receptacles to ensure that lids are closed and pick up any excess trash on the ground, noting trash disposal violations by homeowners and reporting the violations to the HOA/RP for investigation. Daily inspection and weekly sweeping and clean-up or as needed Golcheh Group Section V Page 29 Title 22 CCR Compliance Owner  The Sand Oil Separator will be cleaned/emptied by a Licensed Hazardous Waste Transporter.  The waste shall be shipped to a licensed treatment facility Every 90 days or when the unit reaches 25% capacity Spill Contingency Plan Owner  A spill contingency plan must be prepared by the owner for use by the operator.  Operators will be trained with regard to spill prevention, containment, and disposal.  Equipment and material for cleanup of spills will be available on site at all times. Training at first hire and continuous availability of sill management plans, procedures and materials. Underground Storage Tank Compliance Owner Owner shall comply with all County Environmental Health Department regulations dealing with underground storage tanks Continuously Hazardous Material Disclosure Compliance Owner Owner will provide all signage and maintain all records disclosing Hazardous Materials kept on site in accordance with all of the appropriate Orange County agency standards. Continuously Uniform Fire Code Implementation Owner The site will maintain compliance with the Uniform Fire Code. Continuously Contractor/ Employee Training Owner All contractors shall be trained and made aware of this WQMP and operation and maintenance requirements of BMPs. At first hire and annually thereafter for HOA personnel and employees, to include the educational materials contained in the approved Water Quality Management Plan. Golcheh Group Section V Page 30 LID BMP Maintenence Owner Remove obstructions, debris and trash from infiltration system and dispose of properly. Monthly or as needed after storm events Street Sweeping Parking Lot Owner Remove any trash, grass clippings and other debris in the streets, gutters or parking area and near the system perimeter. Dispose of properly. As needed Trash Collection Area Owner Remove any trash and other debris. Weekly Vehicle Vacuum Area Owner Remove any trash and other debris. Weekly Fueling Area Owner Fueling area will be inspected daily to ensure that inlet containment system is not obstructed and that no spills or was water leaves the filling station pump area onto adjacent surfaces Fueling pad inspection will occur daily. Vehicle Wash Areas Owner  Vehicle Wash Area shall be self-contained with roof/overhang  The Vehicle Wash Area will be provided with a sand oil pretreatment clarifier that discharges to the sanitary sewer. Wash area will occur daily Golcheh Group Section VI Page 31 Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) VI.1 BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) Include a BMP Exhibit (Site Plan), at a size no less than 24” by 36,” which includes the following minimum information:  Insert in the title block (lower right hand corner) of BMP Exhibit: the WQMP Number (assigned by staff) and the grading/building or Planning Application permit numbers  Project location (address, tract/lot number(s), etc.)  Site boundary  Land uses and land covers, as applicable  Suitability/feasibility constraints  Structural BMP locations  Drainage delineations and flow information  Delineate the area being treated by each structural BMP  GIS coordinates for LID and Treatment Control BMPs  Drainage connections  BMP details  Preparer name and stamp Please do not include any areas outside of the project area or any information not related to drainage or water quality. The approved BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) shall be submitted as a plan sheet on all grading and building plan sets submitted for plan check review and approval. The BMP Exhibit shall be at the same size as the rest of the plan sheets in the submittal and shall have an approval stamp and signature prior to plan check submittal. See Appendix C, WQMP BMP Site Plan VI.2 Submittal and Recordation of Water Quality Management Plan Following approval of the Final Project-Specific WQMP, three copies of the approved WQMP (including BMP Exhibit, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan, and Appendices) shall be submitted. In addition, these documents shall be submitted in a PDF format. Each approved WQMP (including BMP Exhibit, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan, and Appendices) shall be recorded in the Orange County Clerk-Recorder’s Office, prior to close-out of grading and/or building permit. Educational Materials are not required to be included. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section VII Page 32 Section VII Educational Materials Education Materials Residential Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable Business Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Tips for the Automotive Industry https://h2oc.org/wp- content/uploads/Tips-for-the- Automotive-Industry.pdf Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar Tips for the Home Mechanic Tips for the Food Service Industry Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business https://h2oc.org/wp- content/uploads/Proper-Maintenance- Practices-for-your-Business.pdf Household Tips Other Material Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (North County) Landscape Activity https://h2oc.org/wp- content/uploads/Tips-for-Landscape- and-Gardening.pdf Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (Central County) Pest Control https://h2oc.org/wp- content/uploads/Responsible-Pest- Control.pdf Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (South County) Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System Responsible Pest Control Sewer Spill Tips for the Home Improvement Projects Tips for Horse Care Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section VII Page 33 Tips for Landscaping and Gardening Tips for Pet Care Tips for Pool Maintenance Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and Hardscape Drains Tips for Projects Using Paint Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section VII Appendix A Operation and Maintenance Plan Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group 1. DMA/Structural LID Description DMA BMP Type Narrative Description Location 1 Bioretention Basin (INF-3) Above-ground 6” deep vegetated basin infiltrating flow into soil. Receives Flow directly from DMA . Northerly perimeter at mid-lot 2 Bioretention Basin (INF-3) Above-ground 6” deep vegetated basin infiltrating flow into soil. Receives Flow directly from DMA . Southeasterly perimeter (directly south of car wash facility) 3 Infiltration Planter (INF-4) Above-ground 6” deep vegetated basin infiltrating flow into soil. Receives Flow directly from DMA . Southerly perimeter (directly south of 7-Eleven building) 4 Bioretention Basin (INF-3) Above-ground 6” deep vegetated basin infiltrating flow into soil. Receives Flow directly from DMA . Northwesterly perimeter adjacent to site egress/ingress 5 Bioretention Basin (INF-3) Above-ground 6” deep vegetated basin infiltrating flow into soil. Receives Flow directly from DMA . Southerly perimeter (directly south of gas pump island 6 Bioretention Basin (INF-3) Above-ground 6” deep vegetated basin infiltrating flow into soil. Receives Flow directly from DMA . Westerly perimeter (directly west of gas pump island) Self Treating Area 1” min. deep 100% pervious area along Easterly perimeter Easterly Perimeter contiguous with northerly and southerly perimeter. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Section 2 Personnel, Documentation, and Reporting 2.1 Maintenance Roles and Responsibilities The roles related to O&M of the BMPs are defined as follows:  Facility Owner – The Facility Owner is the party who is ultimately responsible for the functionality of all BMPs. The maintenance agreement (Attachment 2) identifies the facility owner for each BMP, including the timing of any ownership transitions.  Responsible Party – The Responsible Party is the party that shall have direct responsibility for the O&M of the BMPs. This party shall be the designated contact with inspectors and lead maintenance personnel. The Responsible Party shall sign self-inspection reports and any correspondence regarding the verification of inspections and required maintenance. The Responsible Party will establish a system to delegate general inquiries to the appropriate maintenance personnel concerning the operation and maintenance of the BMPs. The Responsible Party reports directly to the Facility Owner and operates and manages the BMPs on the Facility Owner’s behalf.  Designated Emergency Respondent – The Designated Emergency Respondent is the party responsible for directing activities and communications during emergencies such as broken irrigation pipes, landslides, hazardous spill responses etc., that would require immediate response should they occur during off-hours. It is the responsibility of the Designated Emergency Respondent to communicate the emergent situation with the Responsible Party as soon as possible.  Key Maintenance Personnel – Key Maintenance Personnel are the designated lead field manager(s) or supervisor(s) who directly oversee and delegate the maintenance activities, maintain the scheduling, and coordinate activities between all personnel. These tend to change more often than other personnel over time, so their names do not necessarily need to be included in the O&M Plan. However, they must be properly trained as recorded in the training logs (Section 2.2). The table below lists the roles for this project. This table must be updated whenever changes occur. Role Name (Title and Affiliation) Phone Number Address Email Address Facility Owner Ilan Golcheh Golcheh Group (310) 923-2594 1180 S. Beverly Dr., Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90035 Ilan@GolchehGroup.com Responsible Party Ilan Golcheh Golcheh Group (310) 923-2594 1180 S. Beverly Dr., Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90035 Ilan@GolchehGroup.com Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Designated Emergency Respondent To Be Determined 2.2 Qualification and Training Requirements for Personnel Many of the activities presented in this O&M plan can be completed by personnel with basic landscaping and yard maintenance skills and project-specific orientation. However, there are activities that require a more experienced skillset to identify and remediate potential issues that could compromise the functionality of each BMP. The Responsible Party shall exercise discretion in determining the skillset required to complete each task. Activities that can typically be completed by maintenance personnel with basic training and/or qualifications include:  General landscaping activities (pruning, weeding, and raking)  Routine sediment, trash and debris removal;  Filling in minor scour or erosion areas, or replacing rip rap that has become displaced; and  Watering or irrigation, as necessary. Activities that typically require maintenance personnel with specialized qualifications, training, and/or engineering oversight include:  Inspection and/or repair of inflow and outflow structures;  Inspection and/or repair of underground elements;  Large-volume sediment or media removal requiring specialized equipment;  Inspection, diagnosis, and remediation of significant erosion issues potentially compromising function and/or structural stability; and  Spill response and remediation. Maintenance personnel who have identified a potential major issue with any facility should contact the designated key maintenance personnel for the facility immediately. Training must be provided for all personnel performing maintenance tasks on or providing maintenance oversight of structural BMPs. The table below provides the personnel and relevant training topics. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Training Logs contained in Attachment 3 should be used to document training of maintenance personnel. Training Topic Responsible Party Designated Emergency Respondent Key Maintenance Personnel Proper Maintenance of all BMP components X X Identification and clean-up procedures for spills and overflows X X X Safety concerns when maintaining devices and responding to emergency situations X X X 2.3 Maintenance Agreements and Funding Mechanisms Operations and Maintenance will be the responsibility of the owner, who will enter a Covenant and Agreements with City of Anaheim to ensure the ongoing operation, maintenance, funding, transfer and implementation of the project-specific WQMP requirements for perpetuity. 2.4 Record Keeping Requirements Documentation of site conditions, maintenance activities performed, and any other remaining maintenance required is necessary during each inspection/maintenance visit. Inspection and maintenance records shall be retained in an accessible, secure location for the life of the facility, and not less than 10 years. The following documentation mechanisms and procedures have been established for this O&M Plan:  Training Logs: Personnel must document training activities as part of implementing this O&M Plan. Attachment 3 contains a sample training log.  Inspection and Routine Maintenance Logs: Maintenance personnel are required to maintain logs of inspection and maintenance activities. Attachment 4 contain inspection and maintenance logs. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group  Rehabilitative and Corrective Maintenance Log and Reporting: Rehabilitation and corrective maintenance activities should be documented at a degree of detail that is commensurate to the complexity/significance of the activity. Any significant changes to the BMP designs that arise from rehabilitation/corrective maintenance will be documented via an update to the Project WQMP and as-built drawings. Corrective maintenance that does not result in design changes will be documented as a special entry in the maintenance logs to provide pertinent details of that rehabilitative or corrective maintenance activity. An on-site monitoring plan with requirements for documentation is not required. 2.5 Required Permits Associated with Maintenance Activities No additional permits are required in order to implement maintenance activities. 2.6 City Inspections The City of Anaheim may conduct a site inspection to evaluate compliance with the Project WQMP, at any time, in accordance with City of Anaheim Municipal Code 10.09. 2.8 Electronic Data Submittal This document, along with the attachments, shall be provided to the City or in PDF format. Autocad files and/or GIS coordinates of BMPs shall also be submitted to the City/County. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Section 3 Inspection and Maintenance Activities A table identifying the inspection and O&M activities for source control BMPs incorporated into the project is provided in Section 5 in the main body of the Conceptual WQMP document. Table 3.1 contains common maintenance activities and frequencies associated with structural LID BMPs with an explanation of the type of maintenance activities associated with the structural LID BMPs. 3.1 Inspection and Maintenance of Structural LID BMPs The section is organized by type of structural LID BMP with separate tables for each BMP type included in the project. This section identifies categories of activities related to O&M of the BMPs: General Inspections - Evaluations conducted at regularly scheduled intervals to indicate the need for maintenance of structural BMPs. Routine Maintenance Activities – Activities conducted at regularly scheduled intervals to sustain long-term performance of each BMP, including inspections and normal upkeep. Corrective (Major) Maintenance Activities – Includes activities conducted to replace or rehabilitate system components at the end of their usable life as well as activities conducted to resolve major issues that are not anticipated. BMP ID BMP Type Reference Maintenance Table DMA 1 Bioretention Basin INF-3 DMA 2 Bioretention Basin INF-3 DMA 3 Infiltration Planter INF-4 DMA 4 Bioretention Basin INF-3 DMA 5 Bioretention Basin INF-3 DMA 6 Bioretention Basin INF-3 DMA 7 100% Pervious Self Retaining Area Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group INF-3 Bioretention Without Underdrain Activity Frequency GENERAL INSPECTIONS Remove trash and debris Four times per year during wet season, including inspection just before the wet season and within 24 hours after at least two storm events ≥ 0.5 inches. Repair eroded facility areas Inspect and maintain access roads Inspect and resolve areas of standing water Remove minor sediment in facility bottom Provide vector control if needed Identify any needed corrective maintenance that will require site-specific planning or design ROUTINE MAINTENANCE Vegetation Irrigate as recommended by a landscape professional, typically for the first 3 years to establish vegetation As needed Remove undesirable vegetation Four times per year during wet season, including inspection just before the wet season. Reseed or replant areas of thin or missing vegetation Annually Mulch Remove and replace mulch in areas where significant sediment (>1 inch) has accumulated Annually Add an additional 1-2 inches of mulch; replace any mulch that is removed Annually Media Layer Scarify media to promote infiltration while removing mulch Annually Replace top 3-6 inches of media layer and replace vegetation Estimated every 10 years (highly site specific) Replace full depth of media and replace vegetation Estimated every 30 years (highly site specific) Inflow, Underdrain and Outflow Structures Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group INF-3 Bioretention Without Underdrain Activity Frequency Check energy dissipation function and add riprap Four times per year during wet season, including inspection just before the wet season. Inspect inlets and outlets and remove accumulated sediment Four times per year during wet season, including inspection just before the wet season. Flush underdrain As needed Repair structural damage to inlets, outlets, and underdrain As needed CORRECTIVE (MAJOR) MAINTENANCE For the adaptable configuration, utilize results of downtown observations to determine the need for adjustment of the outlet structure (i.e., uncapping closed underdrain) Based on twice-yearly drawdown observations following events 0.5 inch or larger Prepare documentation of issues and resolutions for review by appropriate parties; modify WQMP if needed. Before major maintenance Document major maintenance activities; record modified WQMP and as-built plan set if needed After major maintenance Take photographs before and after from the same vantage point Before and after Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group INF-4 Bioinfiltration/Bioretention With Underdrain Activity Frequency GENERAL INSPECTIONS Remove trash and debris Four times per year during wet season, including inspection just before the wet season and within 24 hours after at least two storm events ≥ 0.5 inches. Repair eroded facility areas Inspect and maintain access roads Inspect and resolve areas of standing water Remove minor sediment in facility bottom Provide vector control if needed Identify any needed corrective maintenance that will require site-specific planning or design ROUTINE MAINTENANCE Vegetation Irrigate as recommended by a landscape professional, typically for the first 3 years to establish vegetation As needed Remove undesirable vegetation Four times per year during wet season, including inspection just before the wet season. Reseed or replant areas of thin or missing vegetation Annually Mulch Remove and replace mulch in areas where significant sediment (>1 inch) has accumulated Annually Add an additional 1-2 inches of mulch; replace any mulch that is removed Annually Media Layer Scarify media to promote infiltration while removing mulch Annually Replace top 3-6 inches of media layer and replace vegetation Estimated every 10 years (highly site specific) Replace full depth of media and replace vegetation Estimated every 30 years (highly site specific) Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group INF-4 Bioinfiltration/Bioretention With Underdrain Activity Frequency Inflow, Underdrain and Outflow Structures Check energy dissipation function and add riprap Four times per year during wet season, including inspection just before the wet season. Inspect inlets and outlets and remove accumulated sediment Four times per year during wet season, including inspection just before the wet season. Flush underdrain As needed Repair structural damage to inlets, outlets, and underdrain As needed CORRECTIVE (MAJOR) MAINTENANCE Prepare documentation of issues and resolutions for review by appropriate parties; modify WQMP if needed. Before major maintenance Document major maintenance activities; record modified WQMP and as-built plan set if needed After major maintenance Take photographs before and after from the same vantage point Before and after Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group 3.2 Emergency Response Plan In some cases, adverse conditions may occur which could be an imminent threat to human or environmental health or severe damage to infrastructure or property. For example, a spill of hazardous substances in the contributing area to a BMP could cause harmful substances to enter the BMP and be released downstream, affecting environmental and public health. Other emergencies could arise related to the stormwater features or water quality protection, such as landsliding, major erosion, or burst pipes in the tributary area. In the event of an actual or suspected hazardous material release, the following plan shall take effect. The primary importance of initial response to an actual or suspected spill will be public safety, control of the source of pollution, and containment of spills that have occurred, as applicable. The table below provides the emergency contact information for hazardous materials spills affecting BMPs. Name Phone When to Report Local Emergency Response (Fire Department) 911 Immediately Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1-877-897-7455 Immediately CalOES State Warning Center 1-800-852-7550 Immediately The first number to call is emergency response (9-1-1), followed by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES), formerly the California Emergency Management Agency (CalEMA). (CalOES) maintains guidance and instructions of what to do in the event of a spill of hazardous substances (http://www.caloes.ca.gov/cal-oes-divisions/fire-rescue/hazardous- materials/spill-release-reporting). This plan is based on the guidance provided by CalOES (CalOES, 2014). 1. If an actual or suspected hazardous material incident exists, maintenance personnel will immediately call 911 and the CalOES State Warning Center (Error! Reference source not found.). 2. The Designated Emergency Respondent and Responsible Party assigned to the facility (from Section 2.1) must also be notified of any actual or potential spill. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group 3. Remediation of contamination in the water quality facility should be handled as a corrective maintenance issue per Section 3.2 of this O&M plan. In the event that a potential spill is identified prior to it reaching the BMPs, the Designated Emergency Respondent will implement an isolation protocol to prevent the spill from entering the BMP. An inflatable plug, Hazmat Plug, or equivalent device as approved by the Designated Emergency Respondent will be installed within the storm drains or catch basins to block upstream flow from reaching and contaminating the BMP. The temporary plug will be an interim measure until the spill is properly maintained and remediated and the Designated Emergency Respondent has determined the risk to the BMP of contamination no longer exists. Similar measures should be taken in the event of a landslide, mudslide, or major erosion within the tributary area of the BMP to prevent sediment from damaging the BMP to the extent possible. 3.3 Vector Control In addition to the inspection and maintenance activities listed in Section 3, all BMPs shall be inspected for standing water on a regular basis. Standing water which exists for longer than 72 hours may contribute to mosquito breeding areas. Standing water may indicate that the BMP is not functioning properly and proper action to remedy the situation shall be taken in a timely manner. Elimination of standing water and managing garbage, lawn clippings, and pet droppings can help decrease the present of mosquitoes and flies in the area. The Orange County Vector Control District may be contacted for more information and support at 714-971-2421 or 949-654-2421 or www.ocvcd.org. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Attachment 1: Photos and Exhibits Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Attachment 2: Maintenance Agreement and Funding Mechanism Documentation Source funding and long term funding will be provided by owner or owner’s agent. Operations and maintenance of the project BMPs shall comply with the actions and schedule listed in Section V of the project Water Quality Management Plan. Funding mechanism agreement will be in place prior to final project approval that will ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural BMPs. This mechanism may be provided either through the local jurisdiction under a maintenance agreement or other mechanism, or by the project proponent. A notarized copy of the funding agreement will be provided in the Final WQMP report. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Attachment 3: Training Log Form Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group TRAINING / EDUCATIONAL LOG Date of Training/Educational Activity: Name of Person Performing Activity (Printed): Signature: Topic of Training/Educational Activity: Name of Participant Signature of Participant For newsletter or mailer educational activities, please include the following information:  Date of mailing:  Number distributed:  Method of distribution:  Topics addressed: If a newsletter article was distributed, please include a copy of it. Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Attachment 4: Inspection and Maintenance Log Form Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group BMP OPERATION & MAINTENANCE LOG ANAHEIM 7-ELEVEN Today’s Date: Name of Person Performing Activity (Printed): Signature: BMP Name or Type (As Shown in O&M Plan) Brief Description of Operation, Maintenance, or Inspection Activity Performed Summary of Notable Observations or Outcomes from Activity [add additional pages, photographs, drawings, notes as needed] Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Attachment 5: Inspection and O&M Checklist (Optional) Guidance: Based on the BMPs present at the site, this checklist is intended to summarize the activities necessary at each frequency. Include more details if desired. Weekly Activities Check Box Selected source control/housekeeping activities (See Section 3.1) Monthly Activities Selected source control/housekeeping activities (See Section 3.1) Quarterly Activities (before wet season, after wet season, plus twice after rain > 0.5 inches) Inspections of selected source control BMPs (See Section 3.1) Inspections and as-needed minor maintenance of all structural treatment and hydromodification BMPs (See Section 3.3) Twice Yearly Activities (during dry weather) Dry weather flow inspections (non-structural source control) (See Section 3.1) Inspection and as-needed maintenance of other selected source control BMPs(See Section 3.1) Annual Activities Self-certification (See Section 2.6) Various source control BMP and housekeeping activities (See Section 3.1) Inspection and maintenance of HSCs (See Section 3.2) Various planned maintenance activities of treatment and hydromodification BMPs, such as vegetation maintenance, minor sediment maintenance, etc. (See Section 3.3) Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Operation and Maintenance Plan Golcheh Group Attachment 6: Vendor O&M Information Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section VII Appendix B Infiltration Feasibility TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT 2-34 December 20, 2013 Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 1 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk for groundwater related concerns? Refer to Appendix VIII (Worksheet I) for guidance on groundwater-related infiltration feasibility criteria. Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 2 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk of increasing risk of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level? (Yes if the answer to any of the following questions is yes, as established by a geotechnical expert): •The BMP can only be located less than 50 feet away from slopes steeper than 15 percent •The BMP can only be located less than eight feet from building foundations or an alternative setback. •A study prepared by a geotechnical professional or an available watershed study substantiates that stormwater infiltration would potentially result in significantly increased risks of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level. Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 3 Would infiltration of the DCV from drainage area violate downstream water rights? Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. Runoff under existing condition drain directly into a public storm drain facility, then into the Santa Ana River. No water rights to this small amount of surface runoff s listed in the South County Permit. Bioretention and Bioinfiltration BMP systems are proposed and have shallow profiles based on design guidance provided in Fact Sheets. The depth to the the seasonally high groundwater is greater than 15 ft (TGD,V111.2). TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT 2-35 December 20, 2013 Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Partial Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 4 Is proposed infiltration facility located on HSG D soils or the site geotechnical investigation identifies presence of soil characteristics which support categorization as D soils? Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 5 Is measured infiltration rate below proposed facility less than 0.3 inches per hour? This calculation shall be based on the methods described in Appendix VII. Provide basis: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 6 Would reduction of over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 7 Would an increase in infiltration over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. The site specific Desktop Geotechnical Study list on-site soils conducive to "moderate to high infiltration rates". The site specific Desktop Geological Study lists the on-site soils as the type that are conducive to moderate to high infiltration rates (fine sand, clayey sand, course sand, gravel) Post development conditions are very similar to predevelopment conditions with the exception that measures are introduced to prevent the DCV from flowing off-site. Biotreatment BMPs are proposed to capture and treat a relatively small Design Capture Volume. Site research indicates no presence of plumes. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT 2-36 December 20, 2013 Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Infiltration Screening Results (check box corresponding to result): 8 Is there substantial evidence that infiltration from the project would result in a significant increase in I&I to the sanitary sewer that cannot be sufficiently mitigated? (See Appendix XVII) Provide narrative discussion and supporting evidence: Summarize findings of studies provide reference to studies, calculations, maps, data sources, etc. Provide narrative discussion of study/data source applicability. 9 If any answer from row 1-3 is yes: infiltration of any volume is not feasible within the DMA or equivalent. Provide basis: Summarize findings of infeasibility screening 10 If any answer from row 4-7 is yes, infiltration is permissible but is not presumed to be feasible for the entire DCV.Criteria for designing biotreatment BMPs to achieve the maximum feasible infiltration and ET shall apply. Provide basis: Summarize findings of infeasibility screening 11 If all answers to rows 1 through 11 are no, infiltration of the full DCV is potentially feasible, BMPs must be designed to infiltrate the full DCV to the maximum extent practicable. Harvest and Use Infeasibility Harvest and use infeasibility criteria include: •If inadequate demand exists for the use of the harvested rainwater. See Appendix X for guidance on determining harvested water demand and applicable feasibility thresholds. •If the use of harvested water for the type of demand on the project violates codes or ordinances most applicable to stormwater harvesting in effect at the time of project application and a waiver of these codes and/or ordinances cannot be obtained. It is noted that codes and ordinances most applicable to stormwater harvesting may change All answers for rows 1-3 are "NO" All answers for rows 4-7 are "NO". TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES VIII-13 December 20, 2013 Worksheet I: Summary of Groundwater-related Feasibility Criteria 1 Is project large or small? (as defined by Table VIII.2) circle one Large Small 2 What is the tributary area to the BMP?A acres 3 What type of BMP is proposed? 4 What is the infiltrating surface area of the proposed BMP?ABMP sq-ft 5 What land use activities are present in the tributary area (list all) 6 What land use-based risk category is applicable?L M H 7 If M or H, what pretreatment and source isolation BMPs have been considered and are proposed (describe all): 8 What minimum separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater applies to the proposed BMP? See Section VIII.2 (circle one) 5 ft 10 ft 9 Provide rationale for selection of applicable minimum separation to seasonally high mounded groundwater: 10 What is separation from the infiltrating surface to seasonally high groundwater?SHGWT ft 11 What is separation from the infiltrating surface to mounded seasonally high groundwater? Mounded SHGWT ft 12 Describe assumptions and methods used for mounding analysis: 13 Is the site within a plume protection boundary (See Figure Y N N/A Commercial Retail, Car Wash Facility, Gas Pumps with paved access and parking. Perimeter planting areas are proposed and a poertion of the site will remain unpaved. 30 20 Berming and separate storm drain catchment facilities are employed to isolate spill and prevent runoff tributary to the proposed gas pump area and car wash facility to flow away from these facilities and into infiltration BMPs. Sand-Oil separators will be used to pretreat runoff from these areas before it can be discharges to the sanitary sewer system. This collection system is to be separate from the on-site storm drain system. The proposed Infiltration BMPs do not inject water below the subsurface and do not receive runoff from land use activities that pose a significant contamination risk (i.e., gas pumps, car wash facilities). Assumptions are based on existing groundwater depth information in the Geotechnical study as well as average fluctuation data from OCWD for the project site. Worst case projections based on similar examples with BMP surface area in the range of 4,000 s.f. and an infiltration rate of 0.85 in/hr were used to estimate a mounding height of 10ft. 1.72 Bioretention Basins without Under- drain and Bioinfiltration Planter 4,176 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES VIII-14 December 20, 2013 Worksheet I: Summary of Groundwater-related Feasibility Criteria VIII.2)? 14 Is the site within a selenium source area or other natural plume area (See Figure VIII.2)?Y N N/A 15 Is the site within 250 feet of a contaminated site?Y N N/A 16 If site-specific study has been prepared, provide citation and briefly summarize relevant findings: 17 Is the site within 100 feet of a water supply well, spring, septic system?Y N N/A 18 Is infiltration feasible on the site relative to groundwater- related criteria?Y N Provide rationale for feasibility determination: Note: if a single criterion or group of criteria would render infiltration infeasible, it is not necessary to evaluate every question in this worksheet. Several resources of information listed in the TGD point to the use of infiltration type systems being feasible. Groundwater depth is reasonably deep, groundwater plumes were not found to be present, and the type proposed only use the surface for infiltration rather than injection type infiltration systems. Groundwater Level is > 50 ft Below Surface Based on Geotechnical Report. Depth to Groundwater does not Constrain Infiltration. GEOTRACKER SITE CONTAMINATION DATA ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYRIVERSIDE COUNTYRIVERSIDE COUNTY ORA N G E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y 1 0 10 3 5 1 0 30 1 0 3 0 10 20 1 0 10 5 50 3 30 3 0 3 0 30 2 0 5 1 0 20 30 50 1 0 3 0 2 0 P : \ 9 5 2 6 E \ 6 - G I S \ M x d s \ R e p o r t s \ I n f i l t r a t i o n F e a s a b i l i t y _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 \ 9 5 2 6 E _ F i g u r e X V I - 2 d _ D e p t h T o G r o u n d w a t e r O v e r v i e w _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 . m x d FIGURE XVI-2dJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.25 miles DESIGNED DRAWING CHECKEDBMP02/09/11 DATE JOB NO.9526-E TH THORANGE COUNTY INFILTRATION STUDY ORANGE CO.CANORTH ORANGE COUNTY MAPPED DEPTH TO FIRST GROUNDWATER SU B J E C T T O F U R T H E R R E V I S I O N Note: Data are not available for South Orange County at this ti me.Source:Sprotte, Fuller and Greenwood, 1980.California Division of Mines and Geology;California Geological Survey !I 02 .55 1. 2 5 Mi l e s 04 8 2 Ki l o m e t e r s LEGEND Depth To First Groundwater Contours City Boundaries OCWD Groundwater Basin Protection Boundary Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section VII Appendix C BMP Site Plan Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section VII Appendix D BMP Fact Sheets TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-28 December 20, 2013 INF-3: Bioretention with no Underdrain Bioretention stormwater treatment facilities are landscaped shallow depressions that capture and filter stormwater runoff. These facilities function as a soil and plant-based filtration device that removes pollutants through a variety of physical, biological, and chemical treatment processes. The facilities normally consist of a ponding area, mulch layer, planting soils, and plants. As stormwater passes down through the planting soil, pollutants are filtered, adsorbed, and biodegraded by the soil and plants. For areas with low permeability native soils or steep slopes, bioretention areas can be designed with an underdrain system that routes the treated runoff to the storm drain system rather than depending entirely on infiltration. Feasibility Screening Considerations x Bioretention with no underdrains shall pass infiltration infeasibility screening criteria to be considered for use. Opportunity Criteria x Land use may include commercial, residential, mixed use, institutional, and subdivisions. Bioretention may also be applied in parking lot islands, cul-de-sacs, traffic circles, road shoulders, and road medians. x Drainage area is ≤ 5 acres, preferrably ≤ 1 acre. x Area available for infiltration. x Soils are adequate for infiltration or can be amended to improve infiltration capacity. Site slope is less than 15 percent. OC-Specific Design Criteria and Considerations □ Placement of BMPs should observe geotechnical recommendations with respect to geological hazards (e.g. landslides, liquefaction zones, erosion, etc.) and set-backs (e.g., foundations, utilities, roadways, etc.) □ Depth to mounded seasonally high groundwater shall not be less than 5 feet. □ If sheet flow is conveyed to the treatment area over stabilized grassed areas, the site must be graded in such a way that minimizes erosive conditions; sheet flow velocities should not exceed 1 foot per second. □ Ponding depth should not exceed 18 inches; fencing may be required if ponding depth exceeds 6 inches to mitigate the risk of drowning. □ Planting/storage media shall be based on the recommendations contained in MISC-1: Planting/Storage Media □ The minimum amended soil depth is 1.5 feet (3 feet is preferred). □ The maximum drawdown time of the planting soil is 48 hours. Also known as: ¾Rain gardens ¾Infiltration planter Bioretention Source: Geosyntec Consultants TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-29 December 20, 2013 □ Infiltration pathways may need to be restricted due to the close proximity of roads, foundations, or other infrastructure. A geomembrane liner, or other equivalent water proofing, may be placed along the vertical walls to reduce lateral flows. This liner should have a minimum thickness of 30 mils. □ Plant materials should be tolerant of summer drought, ponding fluctuations, and saturated soil conditions for 48 hours; native plant species and/or hardy cultivars that are not invasive and do not require chemical fertilizers or pesticides should be used to the maximum extent feasible. □ The bioretention area should be covered with 2-4 inches (average 3 inches) of mulch at startup and an additional placement of 1-2 inches of mulch should be added annually. □ An optional gravel drainage layer may be installed below planting media to augment storage volume. □ An overflow device is required at the top of the ponding depth. □ Dispersed flow or energy dissipation (i.e. splash rocks) for piped inlets should be provided at basin inlet to prevent erosion. Simple Sizing Method for Bioretention with no Underdrain If the Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method described in Appendix III.3.1 is used to size a bioretention area with underdrains, the user calculates the DCV and designs the system with geometry required to draw down the DCV in 48 hours. The sizing steps are as follows: Step 1: Determine the Bioretention Design Capture Volume Calculate the DCV using the Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method described in Appendix III.3.1. Step 2: Determine the 48-hour Ponding Depth The depth of effective storage depth that can be drawn down in 48 hours can be calculated using the following equation: d48 = KDESIGN × 4 Where: d48 = bioretention 48-hour effective depth, ft KDESIGN = bioretention design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) This is the maximum effective depth of the basin below the overflow device to achieve drawdown in 48 hours. Effective depth includes ponding water and media/aggregate pore space. Step 3: Design System Geometry to Provide d48 Design system geometry such that d48 ≥ dEFFECTIVE = (dP + nMdM + nGdG) Where: d48 = depth of water that can drain in 48 hours dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft dP = bioretention ponding depth, ft (should be less than or equal to 1.5 ft) nM = bioretention media porosity dM = bioretention media depth, ft TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-30 December 20, 2013 nG = bioretention gravel layer porosity; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dG = bioretention gravel layer depth, ft Step 4: Calculate the Required Infiltrating Area The required infiltrating area (i.e. measured at the media surface) can be calculated using the following equation: A = DCV / dEFFECTIVE Where: A = required infiltrating area, sq-ft (measured as the media surface area) DCV = design capture volume, cu-ft (see Step 1) dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft (from Step 3) This does not include the side slopes, access roads, etc. which would increase bioretention footprint. Capture Efficiency Method for Bioretention with no Underdrain If BMP geometry has already been defined and deviates from the 48 hour drawdown time, the designer can use the Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs (See Appendix III.3.2) to determine the fraction of the DCV that must be provided to manage 80 percent of average annual runoff volume. This method accounts for drawdown time different than 48 hours. Step 1: Determine the drawdown time associated with the selected basin geometry DD = (dEFFECTIVE / KDESIGN) × 12 in/ft Where: DD = time to completely drain infiltration basin ponding depth, hours dEFFECTIVE ≤ (dP + nMdM + nGdG) dP = bioretention ponding depth, ft (should be less than or equal to 1.5 ft) nM = bioretention media porosity dM = bioretention media depth, ft nG = bioretention gravel layer porosity; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dG = bioretention gravel layer depth, ft KDESIGN = basin design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) Step 2: Determine the Required Adjusted DCV for this Drawdown Time Use the Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs (See Appendix III.3.2) to calculate the fraction of the DCV the basin must hold to achieve 80 percent capture of average annual stormwater runoff volume based on the basin drawdown time calculated above. Step 4: Check that the Bioretention Effective Depth Drains in no Greater than 96 Hours DD = (dEFFECTIVE / KDESIGN) × 12 Where: DD = time to completely drain bioretention facility, hours dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft (from Step 3) KDESIGN = basin design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-31 December 20, 2013 If DDALL is greater than 96 hours, adjust bioretention media depth and/or gravel layer depth until DD is less than 96 hours. This duration is based on preventing extended periods of saturation from causing plant mortality. Step 5: Determine the Basin Infiltrating Area Needed The required infiltrating area (i.e. the surface area of the top of the media layer) can be calculated using the following equation: A = DCV/ dEFFECTIVE Where: A = required infiltrating area, sq-ft (measured at the media surface) DCV = design capture volume, adjusted for drawdown time, cu-ft (see Step 1) dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft (from Step 3) This does not include the side slopes, access roads, etc. which would increase bioretention footprint. If the area required is greater than the selected basin area, adjust surface area or adjust ponding depth and recalculate required area until the required area is achieved. Configuration for Use in a Treatment Train x Bioretention areas may be preceeded in a treatment train by HSCs in the drainage area, which would reduce the required volume of the bioretention cell. x Bioretention areas can be incorporated in a treatment train to provide enhanced water quality treatment and reductions in runoff volume and rate. For example, runoff can be collected from a roadway in a vegetated swale that then flows to a bioretention area. Similarly, bioretention could be used to manage overflow from a cistern. Additional References for Design Guidance x CASQA BMP Handbook for New and Redevelopment: http://www.cabmphandbooks.com/Documents/Development/TC-32.pdf x SMC LID Manual (pp 68): http://www.lowimpactdevelopment.org/guest75/pub/All_Projects/SoCal_LID_Manual/SoCalL ID_Manual_FINAL_040910.pdf x Los Angeles County Stormwater BMP Design and Maintenance Manual, Chapter 5: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/DES/design_manuals/StormwaterBMPDesignandMaintenance.pdf x San Diego County LID Handbook Appendix 4 (Factsheet 7): http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/LID-Appendices.pdf x Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Stormwater Technical Manual, Chapter 4. http://www.laschools.org/employee/design/fs-studies-and- reports/download/white_paper_report_material/Storm_Water_Technical_Manual_2009-opt- red.pdf?version_id=76975850 County of Los Angeles Low Impact Development Standards Manual, Chapter 5: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/wmd/LA_County_LID_Manual.pdf TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-32 December 20, 2013 INF-4: Bioinfiltration Fact Sheet Bioinfiltration facilities are designed for partial infiltration of runoff and partial biotreatment. These facilities are similar to bioretention devices with underdrains but they include a raised underdrain above a gravel sump designed to facilitate infiltration. These facilities can be used in areas where there are no hazards associated with infiltration, but infiltration of the full DCV may not be feasible due to low infiltration rates or high depths of fill. These facilities may not result in retention of the full DCV but they can be used to achieve the maximum feasible infiltration and ET. Feasibility Screening Considerations x Bioinfiltration shall pass infeasibility screening criteria for infiltration BMPs (TGD Section 2.4.2.4) to be considered for use. x Infiltration rates are allowed to be less than 0.3 inches per hour. Opportunity Criteria x Land use may include commercial, residential, mixed use, institutional, and subdivisions. Bioretention may also be applied in parking lot islands, cul-de-sacs, traffic circles, road shoulders, and road medians. x Drainage area is ≤ 5 acres, preferrably ≤ 1 acre. x Area is available for infiltration. x Site slope is less than 15 percent. OC-Specific Design Criteria and Considerations □ Placement of BMPs should observe geotechnical recommendations with respect to geological hazards (e.g. landslides, liquefaction zones, erosion, etc.) and set-backs (e.g., foundations, utilities, roadways, etc.) □ Depth to mounded seasonally high groundwater shall not be less than 5 feet. □ If sheet flow is conveyed to the treatment area over stabilized grassed areas, the site must be graded in such a way that minimizes erosive conditions; sheet flow velocities should not exceed 1 foot per second. □ Ponding depth should not exceed 18 inches; fencing may be required if ponding depth exceeds 6 inches to mitigate the risk of drowning. □ Planting/storage media shall be based on the recommendations contained in MISC-1: Planting/Storage Media □ The minimum amended soil depth is 1.5 feet (3 feet is preferred). □ The depth of gravel below the underdrain elevation must be designed so that the effective depth that would infiltrate in 48 hours is stored in the gravel layer. □ Underdrain should be placed at the top of the gravel drainage layer to facilitate infiltration. Also known as: ¾Rain gardens ¾Infiltration planter Bioretention Source: Geosyntec Consultants TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-15 December 20, 2013 XIV.2. Miscellaneous BMP Design Element Fact Sheets (MISC) MISC-1: Planting/Storage Media Planting and storage media is a critical design element for several common BMP types, including bioretention, bioinfiltration, swales, filter strips, and greenroofs. This fact sheet is intended to be used as referenced from these fact sheets. General Design Criteria x Planting/storage media should be designed to achieve the long term hydraulic design requirements associated with the design of the facility (i.e., design Ksat). x The planting media shall be designed to address pollutants of concern at the design hydraulic capacity. x Bioretention soil shall also support vigorous plant growth. x Planting media should consist of 60 to 80% fine sand and 20 to 40% compost. x Planting media for projects draining to nutrient sensitive receiving water should adhere to recommendations for nutrient sensitive planting media provided below. Sand x Sand should be free of wood, waste, coating such as clay, stone dust, carbonate, etc., or any other deleterious material. All aggregate passing the No. 200 sieve size should be non-plastic. Sand for bioretention should be analyzed by an accredited lab using #200, #100, #40, #30, #16, #8, #4, and 3/8 sieves (ASTM D 422 or as approved by the local permitting authority) and meet the following gradation (Note: all sands complying with ASTM C33 for fine aggregate comply with the gradation requirements below): Sieve Size (ASTM D422) % Passing (by weight) Minimum Maximum 3/8 inch 100 100 #4 90 100 #8 70 100 #16 40 95 #30 15 70 #40 5 55 #100 0 15 #200 0 5 Also known as: ¾Bioretention soil media (BSM) Street-end biofiltration with planting/storage media Source: City of Portland TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-16 December 20, 2013 x Note: the gradation of the sand component of the media is believed to be a major factor in the hydraulic conductivity of the media mix. If the desired hydraulic conductivity of the media cannot be achieved within the specified proportions of sand and compost (#2), then it may be necessary to utilize sand at the coarser end of the range specified in the table above (“minimum” column). Compost Compost should be a well decomposed, stable, weed free organic matter source derived from waste materials including yard debris, wood wastes, or other organic materials not including manure or biosolids meeting standards developed by the US Composting Council (USCC). The product shall be certified through the USCC Seal of Testing Assurance (STA) Program (a compost testing and information disclosure program). Compost quality should be verified via a lab analysis to be: x Feedstock materials shall be specified and include one or more of the following: landscape/yard trimmings, grass clippings, food scraps, and agricultural crop residues. x Organic matter: 35-75% dry weight basis. x Carbon and Nitrogen Ratio: 15:1 < C:N < 25:1 x Maturity/Stability: shall have dark brown color and a soil-like odor. Compost exhibiting a sour or putrid smell, containing recognizable grass or leaves, or is hot (120 F) upon delivery or rewetting is not acceptable. x Toxicity: any one of the following measures is sufficient to indicate non-toxicity: o NH4:NH3 < 3 o Ammonium < 500 ppm, dry weight basis o Seed Germination > 80% of control o Plant trials > 80% of control x Solvita® > 5 index value x Nutrient content: o Total Nitrogen content 0.9% or above preferred o Total Boron should be <80 ppm, soluble boron < 2.5 ppm x Salinity: < 6.0 mmhos/cm x pH between 6.5 and 8 (may vary with plant palette) x Compost for bioretention should be analyzed by an accredited lab using #200, ¼ inch, ½ inch, and 1 inch sieves (ASTM D 422 or as approved by the local permitting authority) and meet the following gradation: Sieve Size (ASTM D422) % Passing (by weight) Minimum Maximum 1 inch 99 100 ½ inch 90 100 ¼ inch 40 90 #200 2 10 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-17 December 20, 2013 x Tests should be sufficiently recent to represent the actual material that is anticipated to be delivered to the site. If processes or sources used by the supplier have changed significantly since the most recent testing, new tests should be requested. x Note: the gradation of compost used in bioretention media is believed to play an important role in the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the media. To achieve a higher saturated hydraulic conductivity, it may be necessary to utilize compost at the coarser end of this range (“minimum” column). The percent passing the #200 sieve (fines) is believed to be the most important factor in hydraulic conductivity. In addition, a coarser compost mix provides more heterogeneity of the bioretention media, which is believed to be advantageous for more rapid development of soil structure needed to support health biological processes. This may be an advantage for plant establishment with lower nutrient and water input. Mulch x Planting area should generally be covered with 2 to 4 inches (average 3 inches) of mulch at the start and an additional placement of 1 to 2 inches of mulch should be added annually. The intention is that to help sustain the nutrient levels, suppress weeds, retain moisture, and maintain infiltration capacity. x For nutrient-sensitive planting/storage media design, inorganic mulch such as gravel, may be used. Planting/Storage Media Design for Nutrient Sensitive Receiving Waters Where the BMP discharges to receiving waters with nutrient impairments or nutrient TMDLs, the planting media placed should be designed with the specific goal of minimizing the potential for initial and long term leaching of nutrients from the media. x In general, the potential for leaching of nutrients can be minimized by: o Utilizing stable, aged compost (as required of media mixes under all conditions). o Utilizing other sources of organic matter, as appropriate, that are safe, non-toxic, and have lower potential for nutrient leaching than compost. o Reducing the content of compost or other organic material in the media mix to the minimum amount necessary to support vigorous plant growth and healthy biological processes. x A landscape architect should be consulted to assist in the design of planting/storage media to balance the interests of plant establishment, water retention capacity (irrigation demand), and the potential for nutrient leaching. The following practices should be considered in developing the media mix design: o The actual nutrient content and organic content of the selected compost source should be considered when specifying the proportions of compost and sand. The compost specification allows a range of organic content over approximately a factor of 2 and nutrient content may vary more widely. Therefore determining the actual organic content and nutrient content of the compost expected to be supplied is important in determining the proportion to be used for amendment. o A commitment to periodic soil testing for nutrient content and a commitment to adaptive management of nutrient levels can help reduce the amount of organic amendment that must be provided initially. Generally, nutrients can be added planting areas through the addition of organic mulch, but cannot be removed. o Plant palettes and the associated planting mix should be designed with native plants where possible. Native plants generally have a broader tolerance for nutrient content, and can be longer lived in leaner/lower nutrient soils. An additional benefit of lower nutrient levels is that native plants will generally have less competition from weeds. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-18 December 20, 2013 o Nutrients are better retained in soils with higher cation exchange capacity (CEC). CEC can be increased through selection of organic material with naturally high CEC, such as peat, and/or selection of inorganic material with high CEC such as some sands or engineered minerals (e.g., low P-index sands, zeolites, rhyolites, etc). Including higher CEC materials would tend to reduce the net leaching of nutrients. o Soil structure can be more important than nutrient content in plant survival and biologic health of the system. If a good soil structure can be created with very low amounts of compost, plants survivability should still be provided. Soil structure is loosely defined as the ability of the soil to conduct and store water and nutrients as well as the degree of aeration of the soil. While soil structure generally develops with time, planting/storage media can be designed to promote earlier development of soil structure. Soil structure is enhanced by the use of amendments with high hummus content (as found in well-aged organic material). In addition, soil structure can be enhanced through the use of compost/organic material with a distribution of particle sizes (i.e., a more heterogeneous mix). Finally, inorganic amendments such as polymer beads may be useful for promoting aeration and moisture retention associated with a good soil structure. An example of engineered soil to promote soil structure can be found here: http://www.hort.cornell.edu/uhi/outreach/pdfs/custructuralsoilwebpdf.pdf o Younger plants are generally more tolerant of lower nutrient levels and tend to help develop soil structure as they grow. Starting plants from smaller transplants can help reduce the need for organic amendments and improve soil structure. The project should be able to accept a plant mortality rate that is somewhat higher than starting from larger plants and providing high organic content. x With these considerations, it is anticipated that less than 10 percent compost amendment could be used, while still balancing plant survivability and water retention. We wish to express our gratitude to following individuals for their feedback on the design of planting/storage media for nutrient sensitive receiving waters in Southern California. Deborah Deets, City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation Drew Ready, LA and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council Rick Fisher, ASLA, City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering Dr. Garn Wallace, Wallace Laboratories Glen Dake, GDML Jason Schmidt, Tree People The guidance provided herein does not reflect the individual opinions of any individual listed above and should not be cited or otherwise attributed to those listed. Selecting Plants for Planting/Storage Media x Plant materials should be tolerant of summer drought, ponding fluctuations, and saturated soil conditions for 48 to 96 hours. x It is recommended that a minimum of three types of tree, shrubs, and/or herbaceous groundcover species be incorporated to protect against facility failure due to disease and insect infestations of a single species. x Native plant species and/or hardy cultivars that are not invasive and do not require chemical inputs should be used to the maximum extent feasible. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-33 December 20, 2013 □ Infiltration pathways may need to be restricted due to the close proximity of roads, foundations, or other infrastructure. A geomembrane liner, or other equivalent water proofing, may be placed along the vertical walls to reduce lateral flows. This liner should have a minimum thickness of 30 mils. □ Plant materials should be tolerant of summer drought, ponding fluctuations, and saturated soil conditions for 48 hours; native plant species and/or hardy cultivars that are not invasive and do not require chemical fertilizers or pesticides should be used to the maximum extent feasible □ The bioinfiltration area should be covered with 2-4 inches (average 3 inches) of mulch at startup and an additional placement of 1-2 inches of mulch should be added annually. □ An overflow device is required at the top of the ponding depth. □ Dispersed flow or energy dissipation (i.e. splash rocks) for piped inlets should be provided at basin inlet to prevent erosion. □ Planting/storage media shall be based on the recommendations contained in MISC-1: Planting/Storage Media □ Ponding area side slopes shall be 3H:1V. Simple Sizing Method for Bioinfiltration If the Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method described in Appendix III.3.1 is used to size a bioinfiltration facility, the user selects the basin geometry and then determines the volume retained. The sizing steps are as follows: Step 1: Select Bioinfiltration Geometry Determine the desired ponding depth (not to exceed 1.5 ft), gravel depth, surface area, and media saturated hydraulic conductivity. A target media hydraulic conductivity of 5 inches per hour is recommended. Step 2: Verify that the Ponding Depth will Draw Down within 48 Hours The ponding area drawdown time can be calculated using the following equation: DDP = (dP / KMEDIA) × 12 Where: DDP = time to drain ponded water, hours dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft (from Step 3) KMEDIA = media design infiltration rate, in/hr (equivalent to the media hydraulic conductivity with a factor of safety of 2; KMEDIA of 2.5 in/hr should be used as a default unless other information is available to support an alternative value.) If the drawdown time exceeds 48 hours, adjust ponding depth and/or media filter rate until 48 hour drawdown time is achieved. Step 3: Verify That Gravel Depth is Designed for 48 Hour Drawdown In order to demonstrate that bioinfiltration systems have been designed to achieve the maximum feasible retention (See Appendix XI), the gravel depth below the underdrains must be designed with a thickness such that it draws down in 48 hours. DDG = ((dG × nG) / KDESIGN) × 12 Where: DDG = time to drain gravel layer, hours TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-34 December 20, 2013 nG = bioretention gravel layer porosity; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dG = bioretention gravel layer depth, ft KDESIGN = bioretention design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) If DDG is less than 48 hours, adjust dG until DDG is at least 48 hours or greater. Step 4: Determine the BMP Area Needed The required infiltrating area (i.e. the surface area of the top of the media layer) can be calculated using the following equation: A = DCV/ dEFFECTIVE Where: A = required infiltrating area, sq-ft (measured at the media surface) DCV = design capture volume, cu-ft (see Step 1) dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft dEFFECTIVE = (dP + nMdM + nGdG) dP = bioretention ponding depth, ft (should be less than or equal to 1.5 ft) nM = bioretention media porosity dM = bioretention media depth, ft nG = bioretention gravel layer porosity; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dG = bioretention gravel layer depth, ft This does not include the side slopes, access roads, etc. which would increase bioretention footprint. If the area required is greater than the selected basin area, adjust surface area or adjust ponding depth and recalculate required area until the required area is achieved. Capture Efficiency Method for Bioinfiltration Option 1: Accounting for Retention plus Biotreatment in Capture Efficiency Calculation To size bioinfiltration facilities using the Capture Efficiency Method, the system should be divided into its retention and biotreatment components and analyzed as a treatment train per instructions in Appendix III.5 Sizing Approaches for Treatment Trains and Hybrid Systems. x Retention Storage: Water stored in gravel below underdrains. x Biotreatment Storage: Water stored in surface ponding and media pore space. 23 The retention component should be analyzed as the first component of the treatment train, and will yield a capture efficiency that is used as an input to the biotreatment sizing approach. The retention component should be sized such that the depth of gravel drains in 48 hours at the design infiltration rate. 23 In South Orange County, the water stored in surface ponding and media pore space may not be less than 0.75 of the remaining DCV that is not retained. This calculation must be checked if a capture efficiency-based method is used. See Section III.7 and Worksheet SOC-1. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-35 December 20, 2013 Option 2: Sizing of Biotreatment Only; Presumptive Approach for Retention Alternatively, bioinfiltration BMPs can be sized accounting for only the capture efficiency of the biotreatment component (See BIO-1: Bioretention with Underdrains for sizing methods). The retention component should be sized such that the depth of gravel drains in 48 hours or greater at the design infiltration rate. This provides presumption that water is infiltrated without quantifying the volume that is infiltrated. It is inherently a conservative sizing method. Configuration for Use in a Treatment Train x Bioinfiltration areas are inherently a treatment train BMP because they include both retention and biotreatment components. x Bioinfiltration areas may be preceded in a treatment train by HSCs in the drainage area, which would reduce the required volume of the bioretention cell. x Bioinfiltration areas can be incorporated in a treatment train to provide enhanced water quality treatment and reductions in runoff volume and rate. Additional References for Design Guidance x CASQA BMP Handbook for New and Redevelopment: http://www.cabmphandbooks.com/Documents/Development/TC-32.pdf x SMC LID Manual (pp 68): http://www.lowimpactdevelopment.org/guest75/pub/All_Projects/SoCal_LID_Manual/SoCalL ID_Manual_FINAL_040910.pdf x Los Angeles County Stormwater BMP Design and Maintenance Manual, Chapter 5: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/DES/design_manuals/StormwaterBMPDesignandMaintenance.pdf x San Diego County LID Handbook Appendix 4 (Factsheet 7): http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/LID-Appendices.pdf x Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Stormwater Technical Manual, Chapter 4: http://www.laschools.org/employee/design/fs-studies-and- reports/download/white_paper_report_material/Storm_Water_Technical_Manual_2009-opt- red.pdf?version_id=76975850 x County of Los Angeles Low Impact Development Standards Manual, Chapter 5: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/wmd/LA_County_LID_Manual.pdf Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section VII Appendix E Geotechnical Report 1076 Broadway, Suite B • El Cajon • California • 92021 • Phone (858) 513-1469 • Fax (858) 513-1609 Email info@thebodhigroup.com • Website www.thebodhigroup.com September 13, 2019 Project No. 9135002 Mr. Max Antono The Altum Group 73-710 Fred Waring Drive Suite 219 Palm Desert, California 92260 Subject: Geotechnical and Geologic Hazard Evaluation 7-Eleven Convenience Store East Ball Road and Sunkist Street Anaheim, California Dear Mr. Antono, We are pleased to submit our Geotechnical and Geologic Hazard Evaluation in support of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for construction of the 7-Eleven Convenience store at the corner of East Ball Road and Sunkist Street in Anaheim, California. This report identifies geotechnical and geologic hazards that have the potential to affect the Project. Respectfully submitted, THE BODHI GROUP, INC. Lee Vanderhurst, P.G. Sree Gopinath Senior Geologist Principal Engineer Distribution: 1) Addressee Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1. Significant Assumptions .......................................................................................................... 4 2. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 5 3. HISTORY ............................................................................................................................................. 6 4. GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1. Local Geology .......................................................................................................................... 7 4.2. Local Structural Geology ......................................................................................................... 7 5. TECTONICS AND SEISMICITY ........................................................................................................ 8 5.1. Local and Regional Faults ........................................................................................................ 8 5.2. Historical Earthquakes ............................................................................................................. 8 6. LANDSLIDES AND SLOPE STABILITY .......................................................................................... 9 7. SOILS AND INFILTRATION ........................................................................................................... 10 8. HYDROGEOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 11 9. DRAINAGE AND FLOODING ......................................................................................................... 12 10. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND IMPACTS......................................................................................... 13 10.1. Seismicity and Ground Motion .............................................................................................. 13 10.2. Ground Rupture ...................................................................................................................... 13 10.3. Liquefaction, Seismically Induced Settlement ....................................................................... 13 10.4. Tsunamis, Seiches, and Dam Failure ..................................................................................... 14 10.5. Subsidence ............................................................................................................................. 14 10.6. Infiltration .............................................................................................................................. 14 10.7. Expansive or Corrosive Soils ................................................................................................. 14 11. IMPACT MITIGATION ..................................................................................................................... 15 11.1. Seismicity and Ground Motion .............................................................................................. 15 11.2. Liquefaction, Seismically Induced Settlement ....................................................................... 15 11.3. Subsidence ............................................................................................................................. 15 11.4. Corrosive Soil ........................................................................................................................ 15 11.5. Infiltration .............................................................................................................................. 15 12. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................................................ 16 12.1. Threshold G-1 a) Fault Rupture ............................................................................................. 16 12.2. Threshold G-1 b) Strong Seismic Ground Shaking ............................................................... 16 12.3. Threshold G-1 c) Seismic Ground Failure ............................................................................. 16 12.4. Threshold G-1 d) Seismic Induced Landsliding .................................................................... 16 12.5. Threshold G-2 Substantial Soil Erosion and Loss of Topsoil ................................................ 16 12.6. Threshold G-3 Unstable Soil (Landslide, Settlement, Lateral Spreading) ............................. 16 12.7. Threshold G-4 Expansive Soil ............................................................................................... 17 12.8. Threshold G-5 Soil Unsuitable for Onsite Sewage Disposal Systems ................................... 17 13. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 18 14. LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 19 15. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 20 Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 ii Figures Figure 1 – Site Location and Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Regional Geology Figure 3 – Regional Fault Map Tables Table 1 – Fault Characteristics for Active Faults in the Region Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Geotechnical and Geologic Hazard Evaluation (Study) identifies geotechnical and geologic hazards that could have potentially adverse effects on the proposed 7-Eleven Convenience Store to be located on the northeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California (Study Area). For this study, we reviewed relevant geologic maps and planning documents published by the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange. In -house resources were also researched. Please note that this evaluation is not intended for design or construction and is being performed to support the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration document for construction of the 7-Eleven Store. A summary of the geology and geologic hazards is provided below. • The geologic units in the Study Area consists of fill and Quaternary Alluvium. The alluvial deposits are underlain at depth by Tertiary-age sedimentary rock. Documentation of the fill compaction was not found in our Study. Accordingly, the fill may require removal and recompaction beneath settlement sensitive improvements. The alluvium is up to 1,400 feet thick in the vicinity and are moderately consolidated however, near the existing ground surface they can be soft and may need remedial earthwork to support structures. • The Study Area is not underlain by an Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone or known potentially active faults. The closest known active faults are the Whittier-Elsinore fault zone (located approximately 7.5 miles northeast of the Study Area) and the Newport Inglewood fault zone (located about 12 miles southwest of the Study Area). The Study Area, like the rest of Orange County, is in a region of local and regional active faults and will be subject to strong ground motion in the event of an earthquake on these faults. • Liquefaction occurs in soft, saturated soil during moderate to severe ground shaking during earthquakes. According to City of Anaheim maps, the Study Area is not in an area with a potential for liquefaction. Site specific geotechnical investigations in the area indicate post liquefaction differential settlement to be less than ¼-inch. • The Study Area is situated in Flood Hazard Zone X which has a low probability for flooding (1% annual chance flood with average depth of less than 1 foot). The Study Area is also located within a dam inundation zone. In the event of an upstream dam failure, flooding could occur in the Study Area. • Tsunami events caused by large offshore earthquakes or submarine landslides or seiches (waves within enclosed bodies of water) will not affect the Study Area due to the elevation above sea level and the freeboard of flood basins (enclosed bodies of water) located nearby. • Landslide hazards have not been mapped in or in the immediate vicinity of the Study Area. The absence of steep or high slopes precludes landslides. • Most of the Study Area is blanketed with soils that range from low to non-expansive in nature. • Potentially corrosive soils are not common in the area. • Infiltration rates will be affected by the site-specific soil conditions. In general, the soils described in the general vicinity should allow stormwater infiltration. The geologic hazards identified above can be mitigated through engineering design in accordance with established State of California, Orange County and City of Anaheim requirements and codes. Geotechnical investigations are recommended to support the design and construction of the convenience store. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 4 1. INTRODUCTION The Bodhi Group has completed a Geotechnical and Geologic Hazards Study (Study) of the northeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street in Anaheim, California (Study Area, Figure 1). This report presents the results of our “desktop” evaluation of the geotechnical and geologic hazards potentially affecting the Study Area. The purpose of our evaluation was to identify geotechnical and geologic conditions or hazards that might affect development of the planned 7-Eleven Convenience Store on the Study Area. No mapping, subsurface exploration or laboratory testing was performed for this Study. The following services were provided. • Reviewed relevant published geologic information including State of California-issued geologic and hazard maps, and the City of Anaheim General Plan. • Reviewed the Conceptual Site Plan for Site #1043146, by Core States Group, dated 2019. • Reviewed and summarized regional and local geology from publicly-available resources and identified potential geotechnical and geologic hazards. • Researched other City and Orange County resources, historical aerial photographs, geotechnical and geological hazards such as faulting, seismicity, and liquefiable soils. • Prepared this technical report that identifies geotechnical and geologic hazards. Included in this report is a location map (Figure 1), a map of the regional and Study Area geology showing distribution of surficial deposits and geologic units (Figure 2); and a map of nearby active faults (Figure 3). 1.1. Significant Assumptions Documentation and data provided by the client or from the public domain, and referred to in the preparation of this study, are assumed to be complete and correct and have been used and referenced with the understanding that the Bodhi Group assumes no responsibility or liability for their accuracy. The conclusions contained herein are based upon such information and documentation. Because Study Area conditions may change and additional data may become available, data reported and conclusions drawn in this report are limited to current conditions and may not be relied upon on a significantly later date or if changes have occurred in the Study Area. Reasonable CEQA-level efforts were made during the Study to identify geologic hazards. “Reasonable efforts” are limited to information gained from information readily-accessible to the public. Such methods may not identify Study Area geologic or geotechnical issues that are not listed in these sources. In the preparation of this report, the Bodhi Group has used the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by a reasonably prudent environmental professional in the same community and in the same time frame given the same or similar facts and circumstances. No other warranties are made to any third party, either expressed or implied. This evaluation is not intended to replace or supplement geotechnical investigations that are required for design or construction of structures. Separate geotechnical investigations should be performed for the design and construction of the 7-Eleven convenience store project. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 5 2. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Study Area is approximately 0.5 acres and is located at the northeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street in Anaheim, California. (Latitude 33.818305 degrees, Longitude -117.880336 degrees). The Study Area is currently occupied by a 16,500 -square foot, single story building and paved parking. Topographically, the Study Area is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 180 feet to 174 feet from east to west relative to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988. Figure 1 depicts the location of the Study Area. The planned project will include demolition of the existing building and construction of a 3,007-square foot 7-Eleven Convenience Store, a canopy covered refueling station, and a 4,840-square foot car wash. Underground tanks and utilities will also be constructed. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 6 3. HISTORY Review of in-house aerial photographs indicate that between 1946 and 1972, the Study Area was used for agriculture. Sometime before 1980, the area had been developed into residential apartment buildings and single-family dwellings. The Study Area, however, remained vacant. There is a possibility that rough grading for the southbound Orange Freeway exit to Ball Road may have resulted in fill being placed on the Study Area. Between 1980 and 1995, the existing structure was constructed on the Study Area. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 7 4. GEOLOGY The City of Anaheim is in the northern portion of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California. The Peninsular Ranges encompass an area that roughly extends from the Transverse Ranges and the Los Angeles Basin, south to the Mexican border, and beyond another approximately 800 miles to the tip of Baja California (Harden, 1998). The geomorphic province varies in width from approximately 30 to 100 miles, most of which is characterized by northwest-trending mountain ranges separated by subparallel fault zones. In general, the Peninsular Ranges are underlain by Jurassic-age metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks and by Cretaceous-age igneous rocks of the southern California batholith. Geologic cover over the basement rocks in the northern portion of the province in Orange County generally consists of Upper Cretaceous-, Tertiary-, and Quaternary-age sedimentary rocks. Figure 2, Regional Geologic Map, shows the regional geology. The Study Area is located within the Central Block of the Los Angeles Basin (Norris and Webb, 1990) which consists of an alluvial filled basin with a 13,000-foot thick accumulation of sediment. Structurally, the Peninsular Ranges are traversed by several major active faults. The Whittier-Elsinore, San Jacinto, and the San Andreas faults are major active fault systems located northeast of the Study Area and the Newport-Inglewood fault located southwest of Anaheim and the Study Area. Major tectonic activity associated with these and other faults within this regional tectonic framework is generally right- lateral strike-slip movement. These faults, as well as other faults in the region, have the potential for generating strong ground motions in the Study Area. Figure 3, Regional Fault map shows the proximity of the Study Area to nearby mapped Quaternary faults. 4.1. Local Geology The geologic units in the Study Area consists of fill and Quaternary Alluvium. Descriptions of the general characteristics of these units are presented below. • Artificial fill – Fill associated with the existing development should be anticipated in the Study Area. The fills are likely relatively shallow and scattered. They were probably used to create drainage to street gutters, backfill of underground utility trenches and as pavement base. The fill is probably composed of reused underlying natural soil and sediments (silty and clayey fine sand) and import construction materials (gravel and pavement base course). Since no records of compaction were found during this Study, the fills should be considered compressible under new foundation or structural fill loads. • Quaternary Alluvium – The alluvium typically consists of moderately consolidated, clayey and silty fine sand, coarse sand and gravel. These deposits typically can reach thicknesses of over 10,000 feet but are likely less in the Study Area as evidenced by the Tertiary aged sediments underlying the nearby hills to the east. Available geotechnical reports in the nearby vicinity (Leighton and Associates, 2013) indicate that the upper portion of the deposits may be compressible and have recommended remedial grading to create a compacted fill mat beneath buildings and structural loads. Heavier structures may require deep foundations. The alluvium does not usually exhibit expansive potential or corrosivity to steel and concrete. Where disturbed by demolition, the alluvium may require recompaction. 4.2. Local Structural Geology The Older Alluvial Plain Deposits are relatively flat lying. There are no known active or potentially active faults within or projecting into the Study Area or nearby vicinity. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 8 5. TECTONICS AND SEISMICITY Anaheim is affected by the boundary between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. The boundary in southern California is characterized by a wide zone of predominantly northwest-striking, right-slip faults that span Peninsular Range and offshore California Continental Borderland Province (from the California continental slope to the coast). Movement on these faults is cut off by the Transverse Ranges creating compression and resulting in thrust faulting. Some of these thrust faults underlie the northern portion of the Los Angeles Basin. The earthquakes on the thrust faults are capable of causing shaking in the Anaheim area. The most active nearby faults based on geodetic and seismic data are the San Andreas, San Jacinto, Whittier-Elsinore, and Newport Inglewood faults. The active and potentially active faults nearest to the Study Area are shown on Figure 3. 5.1. Local and Regional Faults Table 1 summarizes the local and regional fault characteristics for the active faults that will affect the Study area. A Quaternary fault is defined by the State of California (California Geological Survey, 2018) as a fault that shows evidence of movement in the last 1.6 million years. Quaternary (Holocene and Pleistocene) faults can be classified as either active or potentially active faults. Active faults are those Quaternary Holocene faults which have been shown to have ruptured in the last 11,000 years. Potentially active faults are those Quaternary Pleistocene faults which have been shown to have ruptured during the 1.6 million years but not within the last 11,000 years. Potentially active faults have a much lower probability for future activity than active faults. Earthquakes on the faults summarized in Table 1 below will create ground shaking that can affect the study area. Table 1 - Fault Characteristics for Active Faults in the Region Table References USGS, 2009. 5.2. Historical Earthquakes There have been at least 12 earthquakes within 100 kilometers of the Study Area equal to or greater than magnitude 6 since the early 1800’s. None of these earthquakes have caused any reported structural damage in the City of Anaheim. An earthquake having a magnitude 6 or larger is possible on the active faults closer to the Study Area which could cause damage (Ninyo and Moore, 2001). Fault Name Approximate Distance to Study Area (miles) Slip Rate (mm/yr) Fault Length (miles) Estimated Magnitude (Maximum Moment Magnitude [Mw]) Whittier-Elsinore 7.5 3.0 24 6.7 Newport-Inglewood 12 0.6 29 6.9 Chino 15 1.0 13 6.7 San Jacinto 37 12.0 130 6.9 Southern San Andreas Fault Zone 47 27 140 7.4 Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 9 6. LANDSLIDES AND SLOPE STABILITY The Study Area is relatively flat. Landslides and slope stability will not affect the Study Area. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 10 7. SOILS AND INFILTRATION The soils at the site are a mix of silty fine sand, clayey sand, coarse sand and gravel (City of Anaheim, 2002) which suggest a moderate to high infiltration rate. Other factors should be considered in evaluating storm water infiltration feasibility including lateral migration of water and groundwater mounding. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 11 8. HYDROGEOLOGY Groundwater data for the Study Area is based on an Orange County Water District compilation of water levels in 1997 (OCWD, 2015) which indicate the groundwater table is about 50 feet below existing ground elevations at the site. Groundwater elevations will vary with seasonal rainfall and the amount of water being captured by the recharge basins in the Santa Ana River channel northeast of the Study Area. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 12 9. DRAINAGE AND FLOODING The Study Area is within FEMA Flood Zone “X” which indicates a low probability for flooding (1% annual chance of flood with average depth of less than one foot) (City of Anaheim, 2004). Current drainage in the Study area is by sheet flow from the northeast to the southwest corners of the property into street gutters and storm drains. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 13 10. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND IMPACTS This section identifies geologic hazards that may affect proposed development of the Study Area. These hazards include earthquake shaking ground motion; liquefaction; seismically induced settlement; and subsidence, and dam inundation flooding. These hazards can be mitigated through engineering improvements (e.g., ground improvement, ground restraints, or appropriate structure foundation). Site-specific geotechnical investigations should be performed to evaluate the appropriate mitigation measure or combination of measures. 10.1. Seismicity and Ground Motion An active fault is defined by the State Mining and Geology Board as one that has experienced surface displacement within the Holocene epoch, i.e., during the last 11,000 years (California Geological Survey, 2018). The Study Area is subject to potential ground shaking caused by activity along faults located near the Study Area. Ground shaking during an earthquake can vary depending on the overall magnitude, distance to the fault, focus of earthquake energy, and the type of geologic material underlying the area. The composition of underlying soils, even those relatively distant from faults, can intensify ground shaking. Areas that are underlain by bedrock tend to experience less ground shaking than those underlain by unconsolidated sediments such as fill or unconsolidated alluvium. As noted, the Study Area is subject to ground shaking hazards caused by earthquakes on regional active faults. Based on a Probabilistic Seismic Hazards Ground Motion Interpolator provided by the American Society of Civil Engineers (2018), the Study Area (Longitude -117.098107 Latitude 33.126892) is located in a zone where the horizontal peak ground acceleration having a 10 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years is about 0.6 g (where g represents the acceleration of gravity). 10.2. Ground Rupture There are no known active or potentially active faults beneath or projecting into the Study Area. There are no Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones on or projecting toward the Study Area. 10.3. Liquefaction, Seismically Induced Settlement Liquefaction is a phenomenon where the strength and stiffness of a soil is reduced by earthquake or other rapid loading. The relatively rapid loss of soil shear strength during strong earthquake shaking results in temporary, fluid-like behavior of the soil. Soil liquefaction causes ground failure that can damage roads, pipelines, underground cables, and buildings with shallow foundations. Research and historical data indicate that loose granular soils and non-plastic silts that are saturated by a relatively shallow groundwater table are susceptible to liquefaction. For these reasons, there is a low potential for liquefaction at the Study Area due to a deep groundwater table (i.e., at depths of approximately 50 feet). The Study Area is not within a previously mapped Liquefaction Zone (City of Anaheim, 2004). Among the potential hazards related to liquefaction are seismically induced settlement. Seismically induced settlement is caused by the reduction of shear strength due to loss of grain-to-grain contact during liquefaction and may result in dynamic settlement on the order of several inches to several feet. Other factors such as earthquake magnitude, distance from the earthquake epicenter, thickness of the liquefiable layers, and the fines content and particle sizes of the liquefiable layers will also affect the amount of settlement. Geotechnical investigations in the nearby vicinity (Leighton and Associates, 2013) have found Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 14 that seismically induced differential settlement of ¼-inch can be expected in soils similar to the materials underlying the Study Area. 10.4. Tsunamis, Seiches, and Dam Failure A tsunami is a sea wave generated by a submarine earthquake, landslide, or volcanic action. The Study Area’s elevation is too high to be affected by a tsunami. A seiche is a seismic wave in an enclosed body of water such as a lake or bay. The Ball Road Basins, constructed in the Santa Ana River drainage, are located about 1/3-mile northeast of the Study Area. Water levels are approximately 20 feet below the surrounding ground surface which should be sufficient to prevent over-topping due to seiches. An earthquake-induced dam failure or spillway failure on the Prado Dam could result in a severe flood event. The Study Area is within a Dam Inundation Zone (City of Anaheim, 2004). The predicted flooding, however, is 1 foot or less. The US Army Corp of Engineers is planning to raise the Prado Dam 20 feet and improve the spillway which should reduce the potential for dam failure. 10.5. Subsidence Subsidence typically occurs when extraction of fluids (water or oil) cause the reservoir rock to consolidate. Water extraction is minimal in the Study Area and the geologic materials area well consolidated. Subsidence is not a hazard in the Study Area. Settlement of unconsolidated soil (fill, weathered or disturbed Quaternary Alluvium) may occur locally where new loads are imposed on previously uncompacted fill or unconsolidated alluvium. 10.6. Infiltration The soil under the Study Area will likely exhibit moderate to high infiltration rates. On-site storm water infiltration facilities will need to account for variations in infiltration characteristics due to changes in soil type. 10.7. Expansive or Corrosive Soils The soil in the Study Area is expected to have a low expansion potential and low corrosion potential (City of Anaheim, 2004). Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 15 11. IMPACT MITIGATION The impacts summarized above may be mitigated through engineering improvements (e.g., ground improvement, ground restraints, remedial grading or foundation design). Site specific geotechnical investigations are required to recommend the appropriate mitigation measure(s). 11.1. Seismicity and Ground Motion The entire Study Area will be affected by seismicity and ground motion. Mitigation can be accomplished by geotechnical and structural engineering design. Geotechnical investigations should be conducted in accordance with local guidelines and State of California requirements. Most mitigation measures will involve foundation design and/or ground improvement. 11.2. Liquefaction, Seismically Induced Settlement The Study Area may be susceptible to seismically induced settlement or post liquefaction settlement and should be considered during design of structures. Mitigation can be accomplished by ground improvement and/or foundation design. Geotechnical investigations should be conducted in accordance with local guidelines and State of California requirements. 11.3. Subsidence Construction of improvements in areas underlain by alluvium or fill should be designed to withstand settlement of unconsolidated soil. Geotechnical investigations for design of settlement resistant structures should be conducted in accordance with local guidelines and State of California requirements. Mitigation measures typically include ground improvement and/or foundation design. 11.4. Corrosive Soil Corrosive soil should be evaluated by a Corrosion Engineer for recommendations for soil replacement or cathodic protection if needed. 11.5. Infiltration Infiltration potential should be evaluated in accordance with Orange County Technical Guidance Document, (County of Orange, 2013). Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 16 12. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the project will have significant effect on the environment if: G-1: Expose people to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: a) fault rupture, b) seismic shaking, c) seismic ground failure, d) landsliding. G-2: Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of top soil. G-3: Be located in a geologic unit or soil that is unstable (landsliding, settlement, lateral spreading) or that would become unstable as a result of the project. G-4: Be located on expansive soil causing substantial risk to life or property. G-5: Having soils incapable of supporting the use of septic tanks where sewers are not available. 12.1. Threshold G-1 a) Fault Rupture No significant effect. There are no known active or potentially active faults beneath or projecting into the Study Area. 12.2. Threshold G-1 b) Strong Seismic Ground Shaking Less than significant effect. Construction of the structures, parking lots and underground utilities will be required to use seismic resistant designs in accordance with California, County, and City standards and codes. 12.3. Threshold G-1 c) Seismic Ground Failure Less than significant effect. Construction of structures, parking lots and underground utilities will be required to use seismic resistant designs in accordance with California, County, and City standards and codes. 12.4. Threshold G-1 d) Seismic Induced Landsliding Less than significant effect. The Study Area is level and no slopes are planned. 12.5. Threshold G-2 Substantial Soil Erosion and Loss of Topsoil Less than significant effect. The Study Area is covered in hardscape (pavement and buildings). The proposed development will not alter the hardscape coverage. No soil will be exposed to erosion. Since construction will be required to follow City and County standards and code that stipulate protection against temporary and permanent erosion, the impact of erosion and loss of topsoil is less than significant. 12.6. Threshold G-3 Unstable Soil (Landslide, Settlement, Lateral Spreading) Landslide: Less than significant. Landslide prone geologic formations and tall, steep slopes are not present in the Study Area. Settlement: Less than significant. Construction of structures and other settlement prone improvements will need to use designs resistant to passive and post liquefaction differential settlements in accordance with California, County, and City codes and standards. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 17 12.7. Threshold G-4 Expansive Soil Less than significant. Expansive soils are generally not present in the Study Area. 12.8. Threshold G-5 Soil Unsuitable for Onsite Sewage Disposal Systems Less than significant. Good infiltration characteristics and deep groundwater table may allow use of on-Site storm water systems in the Study Area. Underground sewer systems are available for sewage disposal. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 18 13. CONCLUSIONS The conclusions from this Study are listed below. • There are no geologic hazards that cannot be avoided or addressed. • The proposed land uses are compatible with the known geologic hazards. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 19 14. LIMITATIONS This report was prepared in general accordance with current guidelines and the standard-of-care exercised by professionals preparing similar documents near the Study Area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the professional opinions presented in this document. As this report represents a review of existing documentation on geotechnical conditions of the planning areas rather than in-depth on-site investigation, it cannot account for variations in individual site conditions or changes to existing conditions. Please also note that this document did not include an evaluation of environmental hazards. The conclusions, opinions, and recommendations as presented in this document, are based on a desktop analysis of data, some of which were obtained by others. It is our opinion that the data, as a whole, support the conclusions and recommendations presented in the report. The purpose of this study was to evaluate geologic and geotechnical conditions within the planning areas to assist in the preparation of environmental impact documents for the project. Comprehensive geotechnical evaluations, including subsurface exploration and laboratory testing, should be performed prior to design and construction of structural improvements. Any future projects on individual sites in the planning areas will require site-specific geotechnical studies as required by State and City regulations. Desktop Geotechnical Evaluation September 13, 2019 East Ball Road and Sunkist Street, Anaheim, California Project No. 9135002 20 15. REFERENCES American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019, Seismic Design, http:/asce7hazardtool.online. California Department of Conservation, 2008. Ground Motion Interpolator. Online. http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/PSHA/psha_interpolator.html. California Geological Survey, 2010, Fault Activity Map of California, http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/FAM/faultactivitymap.html#. California Geologic Survey, 2010, Geologic Map of California California Geologic Survey, 2018, Earthquake Fault Zones, a Guide for Government Agencies, Property Owners/Developers, and Geoscience Practitioners for Assessing Fault Rupture Hazards in California, Special Publication 42. City of Anaheim, 2004, General Plan, Safety Element, Geologic and Seismic Safety Consideration, City of Anaheim, 2004, Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update, Environmental Impact Report No. 330, SCH # 2003041105. City of Anaheim, 2018, Beach Boulevard Specific Plan, Draft Environmental Impact Report. City of Anaheim/Orange County Water District, 2018, Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 345, Orange County Water District, Ball Road Basin General Plan Amendment & Zone Change, Anaheim CA (Orange County) Development Project No. 2011-00035. Core States Group, 2019, Ball and Sunkist, Conceptual Site Plan, (Site # 1043146) County of Orange, 2013, Technical Guideline Document (TGD) for the Preparation of Conceptual Preliminary and/or Project Water Quality Management Plans. Division of Mines & Geology, 1997, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Orange County California. Historical Aerials, 2019, http://www.historicaerials/viewer.com. 1960 and 1980, accessed 2019. Leighton Consulting, 2013, Geotechnical Exploration and Analysis, Burris Pump Station Project for Orange County Water District, Anaheim, California, Project No. 10064.001. Ninyo and Moore, 2001, City of Anaheim Seismic and Geotechnical Hazard Evaluation, General Plan Update, Anaheim, California, Project No. 203009001. Orange County Water District, 2015, 1997 Depth to Shallowest Groundwater, ocwd.com/media/3652/1997depthstoshallowestgroundwater, pdf. Jennings, C.W. and Bryant, W.A., 2010, Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas: California Geological Survey, California Geological Map Series, Map No. 6): Scale 1:250,000. FIGURES Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Study Area National Geographic, Esri, Garmin, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, Legend Study Area ³ Study Area 0 10050 Feet 1 inch = 100 feet Site Location and Vicinity Map 7-Eleven Convenience Store East Ball Road and Sunkist Street Anaheim, California DATE: 09/2019 FIGURE 1 E. BALL ROAD S U N K I S T S T R E E T Regional Geology 7-Eleven Convenience Store East Ball Road and Sunkist Street Anaheim, California DATE: 09/2019 FIGURE 2 ³ 0 8,0004,000 Feet Study Area ) f a u l t s i n W e s t C o y o t e H i l l s Elsinorefault zone P e r a l t a H i ll s f a u lt El Mo d e n o f a u l t Lo w e r E l y s i a n P a r k t h r u s t Peralta Hills s t r u c t u r e P ue n t e H i l l s b l i n d t h r u s t s y s t e m USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed October 2018., Sources: Esri, Garmin, USGS, NPS National Geographic, Esri, Garmin, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, Study Area Regional Fault Map 7-Eleven Convenience Store East Ball Road and Sunkist Street Anaheim, California DATE: 09/2019 FIGURE 3 ³ Study Area Legend historic Well Constrained !!late Quaternary Inferred late Quaternary Moderately Constrained late Quaternary Well Constrained undifferentiated Quaternary Inferred Study Area 0 8,0004,000 Feet Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section VII Appendix F Preliminary Hydrology Report ANAHEIM 7-ELEVEN PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS: I PURPOSE AND SCOPE II DESIGN METHODOLOGY III DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME CALCULATIONS IV RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATIONS V INLET SIZING DATA VI HABITABLE STRUCTURES PROTECTION VII APPENDIX A – REFERENCE MATERIAL I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This report was prepared in support of the Anaheim 7-Eleven Entitlement package application and Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan. The purpose of this report is to discuss the existing drainage pattern and proposed drainage strategy for the project based on County of Orange Local Drainage Manual requirements and size the on-site Infiltration Storage BMPs based on the calculated Design Capture Volume (DCV) defined in the North Orange County NPDES standards. The proposed project is located on the northeast corner of E. Ball Road and Sunkist Street in the City of Anaheim. The adjacent surrounding streets are existing and a public underground storm drain and curb inlet are located on E. Ball Road along the project frontage. The improvements include demolition of an existing 16,500 s.f. building and adjoining parking lot, as well as construction of a car wash, 7-Eleven convenience store and covered gasoline fueling station. II. DESIGN METHODOLOGY AND CALCULATIONS The project site is developed in its current condition. Under the existing condition, storm runoff surface flows across the site from the northeast toward the southwest and directly off- site onto E. Ball Road. The site will be 1.72 acres under the proposed condition. Proposed site grading will be such that the northerly half of the site will tend to direct flows toward the northwesterly side of the property while the southerly half of the site will surface drain in a southwesterly direction. All on-site surface runoff will be directed toward planter areas that will serve as shallow BioRetention and BioInfiltration BMPs. These BMPs will be sized to store the Design Capture Volume (DCV) defined as the 85th percentile, 24 hour storm event as required City of Anaheim WQMP requirements where feasible. An 0.09 acre unpaved potion of the site will be “self-retaining” and will be able to store the DCV volume tributary to its area without the need to surface flow to a separate Biotreatment or BioInfiltration BMP. According to City of Anaheim drainage standards, no surface flows generated during the design storm event are permitted to flow over public sidewalks or driveways. Therefore, an on-site private storm drain system will be designed to capture the peak flows generated during the design storm per City of Anaheim drainage requirements and convey them to an available public storm drain system. Since all surface flows are to be directed to Biotreatment BMPs first, and only overflow generated during the design storm will be collected by the on-site storm drain system, sizing of the private storm drain facilities to collect design storm peak flows may be conservative. However, the on-site storm drain system will be sized accordingly in adherence with City standards nonetheless. Private project runoff that exits the site and enters the public storm drain system is conveyed toward the west and into an Orange County Flood Control District (O.C.F.C.D.) Facility (E12P01, per Orange County Drainage Facility Base Map, Sheet 14). An underground storm drain facility E12P01 carries flows in a southerly direction, along State College Boulevard, connecting to an O.C.F.C.D. underground channel (E12) which flows in a southerly direction and empties into the Santa Ana River. According to the City of Anaheim Drainage Manual for Private Drainage Facilities and Flatland Grading Procedures Exhibit C, all private storm drain facilities with drainage areas less than 640 acres and tributary to the Santa River watershed must be designed for the 25-year design storm frequency. Also, the site is design to provide protection so that the storm waters generated during the 100 year design storm frequency event can outlet the site providing a minimum freeboard of 1.0 feet in the event that the on-site storm drain facilities are clogged and fail. The proposed development also includes a car wash and gasoline fueling station. The surfaces of the fueling station pad and the car was interior are “self-treating” areas in that the site will be graded so that no storm runoff will be allowed to enter either of those surface areas. Also, improvements will be designed so that no gasoline spills on the filling station pad or water used in the car wash facility will be allowed to leave either area where they could potentially co-mingle with storm flows. All surface drainage from the filling station pad and car wash will be collected in an underground treatment system where flows will ultimately be directed to the public sewer system. Storm water that lands on the canopy and roof of these facilities will remain separate and be included in storage calculations for on-site storm runoff. A project geotechnical report is not available at this preliminary stage in this project, but will be included in the final drainage report. Although available Orange County Infiltration Study Maps showing NRCS Hydrologic Soils Groups show the project to be in an area where Soil Group ‘A’ exist, the Hydrologic Soil Group for the purposes of this report are assumed to be ‘C’ since the existing site is developed and on-site soils are assumed to be overexcavated and compacted. Section III of this report provides calculations and data quantifying the DCV for six separate on-site Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) (1.63 ac.) and the self-retaining area (0.09 ac.). Flowrates generated during the 25 year storm event are calculated and tabulated in this report for each DMA in order to quantify runoff at the point that it reaches the BMPs and drain inlets. The area of the BMPs within each DMA are not included in these calculations as they do not contribute to the peak runoff. The “self-retaining area” is an unpaved portion of the proposed develop site located at the extreme east end of the site that will not generate surface runoff as it will be designed to store the DCV tributary to its area within a shallow depression (1” minimum, 4” maximum). See WQMP-Hydro Map included in the Appendix portion of this report. Section IV of this report provides Rational Method calculations quantifying 10 year, 25-year and 100 year frequency peak flows generated on-site for both the existing and proposed conditions. Rational Method calculations formed using Orange County Hydrology Manual and the Study Form based on rainfall data from figure B-3 and the appropriate calculation shown. Section V of this report provides suggest inlet sizing data for grading design consideration and Section VI discusses habitable building protection for storm waters generated during the 100 year frequency storm event. DESIGN CRITERIA The following parameters were used in the preparation of the calculations provided in this report:  Percent Impervious (Existing) 83%  Percent Impervious (Proposed) 84%  Design Capture Storm Depth 0.90” O.C. TGD Figure XVI-1  Project Site Area 1.72 Acres  Point Precipitation Rainfall Data O.C. Hydrology Manual (Fig. B-3) III. DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME CALCULATIONS The infiltration BMPs will be sized to store the Design Capture Volume (DCV) defined as the 85th percentile, 24 hour storm event. The DCV is calculated as follows: DCV = C X d X A X 43,560sf/ac X 1/12 in/ft Where: DCV = Design Capture Volume, cu.ft. C = runoff coefficient = (0.75 X imp + 0.15) imp = impervious fraction of drainage area d = storm depth (inches) A = tributary area The DCV has been calculated for each individual on-site Subarea that drains into shallow structural source control BioRetention or BioInfiltration Basin. The shallow BMPs have a depth of 6” with 3:1 side slopes (See typical cross sections in the WQMP-Hydro Map included in the Appendix portion of this report.) The Preliminary Geotechnical Report for the project site indicates that infiltration rates on site can be expected to be in the moderately high range with groundwater deeper than 50ft. In the absence of site specific infiltration data, a relatively low infiltration rate of 0.3 in/hr is assumed. Drawdown calculations provided in the Conceptual WQMP for this project are applied to ponded water depth as well as poor space in the media and aggregate that make up each BMP system. IV. RATIONAL METHOD CALCULATIONS & O.C. STUDY FORM EXISTING CONDITION SUBAREA AREA (SQ.FT.) Q25 FLOWRATE (CFS) E1 0.89 2.37 E2 0.52 1.60 E3 0.16 0.56 E4 0.17 0.65 PROPOSED CONDITION SUBAREA AREA Q25 FLOWRATE (CFS) INLET TYPE FLOWRATE CAPTURED (CFS) INLET 1 0.50 1.43 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 1.43 INLET 2 0.25 0.80 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 0.80 INLET 3 0.21 0.69 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 0.69 INLET 4 0.36 1.12 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 1.12 INLET 5 0.14 0.48 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 0.48 INLET 6 0.04 0.17 2’X2’ GRATED SUMP 0.17 Alternatively, the Nyloplast 2ft x 2ft Adjustable Hood combination curb opening/grate inlet offers a reduced footprint, is applicable to the curb adjacent design proposed for this project and provides over 5 CFS of capacity assuming 0.4ft maximum head. For private main line storm drains within private property, the minimum pipe diameter shall be 12 inches and connections to existing catch basins in the City Right of Way shall be 15 inches. Sizing of on-site storm drain conduits will be provided during final design. 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 June 1, 2020 Ex i s t i n g O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 10 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y J u n e 1 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 10 . 5 Subarea E1 E1 0 . 8 9 0 . 8 9 C C o m m 1 0 . 5 2 . 6 5 3 6 4 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 1 . 9 5 5 3 5 5 2 7 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 0 Q ‐E1 8. 3 Subarea E2 E2 0 . 5 2 0 . 5 2 C C o m m 8 . 3 3 . 0 3 6 3 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 1 . 3 2 1 5 6 2 8 1 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 8 Q‐E2 6. 6 Subarea E3 E3 0 . 1 6 0 . 1 6 C C o m m 6 . 6 3 . 4 6 2 4 6 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 4 6 7 9 9 1 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 7 Q‐E3 5. 7 Subarea E4 E4 0 . 1 7 0 . 1 7 C C o m m 5 . 7 3 . 7 6 5 8 8 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 5 4 3 6 7 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 3 Q‐E4 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 1 3 Si t e T o t a l 1. 7 4 1 . 8 7 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 Existing 10 yr Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Ex i s t i n g 1 0 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e E1 E 2 E 3 E 4 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 8 9 0 . 5 2 0 . 1 6 0 . 1 7 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 7 6 0 . 4 4 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 1 3 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 3 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 2. 6 5 4 3 . 0 3 6 3 . 4 6 2 3 . 7 6 6 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 1. 9 5 5 1 . 3 2 2 0 . 4 6 8 0 . 5 4 4 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 52 7 2 8 1 1 7 0 1 3 0 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 7 7 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 2. 8 4 5 8 1 . 6 2 9 8 1 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 1 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 3 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 June 1, 2020 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 June 1, 2020 Ex i s t i n g O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 25 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y J u n e 1 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 10 . 5 Subarea E1 E1 0 . 8 9 0 . 8 9 C C o m m 1 0 . 5 3 . 1 6 9 6 2 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 2 . 3 6 8 6 5 5 2 7 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 1 Q ‐E1 8. 3 Subarea E2 E2 0 . 5 2 0 . 5 2 C C o m m 8 . 3 3 . 6 2 0 7 8 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 1 . 5 9 5 0 7 2 8 1 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 0 Q‐E2 6. 6 Subarea E3 E3 0 . 1 6 0 . 1 6 C C o m m 6 . 6 4 . 1 2 2 2 9 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 5 6 3 0 1 1 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 1 Q‐E3 5. 7 Subarea E4 E4 0 . 1 7 0 . 1 7 C C o m m 5 . 7 4 . 4 7 8 9 4 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 6 5 2 7 7 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 8 Q‐E4 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 1 3 Si t e T o t a l 1. 7 4 1 . 8 7 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 Existing 25 yr Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Ex i s t i n g 2 5 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e E1 E 2 E 3 E 4 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 8 9 0 . 5 2 0 . 1 6 0 . 1 7 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 7 6 0 . 4 4 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 1 3 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 3 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 3. 1 7 0 3 . 6 2 1 4 . 1 2 2 4 . 4 7 9 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 2. 3 6 9 1 . 5 9 5 0 . 5 6 3 0 . 6 5 3 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 52 7 2 8 1 1 7 0 1 3 0 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 7 7 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 2. 8 4 5 8 1 . 6 2 9 8 1 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 1 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 8 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 June 1, 2020 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 June 1, 2020 Ex i s t i n g O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 10 0 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y J u n e 1 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 10 . 5 Subarea E1 E1 0 . 8 9 0 . 8 9 C C o m m 1 0 . 5 4 . 0 4 4 5 3 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 3 . 0 6 9 4 6 5 2 7 0 . 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 9 Q ‐E1 8. 3 Subarea E2 E2 0 . 5 2 0 . 5 2 C C o m m 8 . 3 4 . 6 2 7 8 3 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 2 . 0 6 6 3 8 2 8 1 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 1 Q‐E2 6. 6 Subarea E3 E3 0 . 1 6 0 . 1 6 C C o m m 6 . 6 5 . 2 7 7 2 9 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 7 2 9 3 3 1 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 5 Q‐E3 5. 7 Subarea E4 E4 0 . 1 7 0 . 1 7 C C o m m 5 . 7 5 . 7 3 9 7 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 8 4 5 6 7 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 1 1 4 Q‐E4 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 1 3 Si t e T o t a l 1. 7 4 1 . 8 7 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 Existing 100 yr Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Ex i s t i n g 1 0 0 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e E1 E 2 E 3 E 4 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 8 9 0 . 5 2 0 . 1 6 0 . 1 7 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 7 6 0 . 4 4 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 1 3 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 3 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 10 . 5 8 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 7 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 4. 0 4 5 4 . 6 2 8 5 . 2 7 7 5 . 7 4 0 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 2 1 3 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 8 5 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 0 . 2 1 2 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 3. 0 6 9 2 . 0 6 6 0 . 7 2 9 0 . 8 4 6 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 52 7 2 8 1 1 7 0 1 3 0 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 5 8 0 . 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 7 7 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 2. 8 4 5 8 1 . 6 2 9 8 1 . 0 0 3 1 . 0 0 1 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 7 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 1 1 4 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 June 1, 2020 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 May 31, 2020 Pr o p o s e d O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 10 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y M a y 3 1 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 9. 3 Subarea P1 P1 0 . 5 0 . 5 C C o m m 9 . 3 2 . 8 4 4 7 4 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 1 . 1 8 6 7 6 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 4 Q‐P1 7. 7 Subarea P2 P2 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 C C o m m 7 . 7 3 . 1 6 9 7 4 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 6 6 6 5 2 2 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 1 Q‐P2 7. 5 Subarea P3 P3 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 C C o m m 7 . 5 3 . 2 1 7 9 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 5 6 8 9 7 2 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 2 Q‐P3 8. 1 Subarea P4 P4 0 . 3 6 0 . 3 6 C C o m m 8 . 1 3 . 0 7 9 0 8 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 9 3 0 3 9 2 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 9 Q‐P 4 6. 8 Subarea P5 P5 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 C C o m m 6 . 8 3 . 4 0 3 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 4 0 2 7 3 1 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 6 Q‐P 5 5 Subarea P6 P6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 C C o m m 5 4 . 0 5 9 5 1 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 1 3 8 6 7 6 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 0 Q‐P6 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 3 5 Si t e T o t a l 1. 5 1 . 8 5 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 P r o p o s e d 1 0 y r Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Pr o p o s e d 1 0 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e P1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 P 6 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 1 0 . 3 6 0 . 1 4 0 . 0 4 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 4 2 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 7 0 . 3 0 0 . 1 2 0 . 0 3 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 0 9 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 1 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 2. 8 4 5 3 . 1 7 0 3 . 2 1 8 3 . 0 7 9 3 . 4 0 4 4 . 0 6 0 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 1. 1 8 7 0 . 6 6 7 0 . 5 6 9 0 . 9 3 0 0 . 4 0 3 0 . 1 3 9 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 37 0 2 2 0 2 0 5 2 6 0 1 6 0 6 5 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 1. 8 5 1 . 1 1 . 0 2 5 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 3 2 5 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 8 0 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 May 31, 2020 25 0 7 E . B a l l R o a d , A n a h e i m , C A 9 2 8 0 6 May 31, 2020 Pr o p o s e d O C H y d r o l o g y RA T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y F O R M Pa g e 1 of 1 OR A N G E C O U N T Y ST U D Y N A M E : A n a h e i m 7 ‐ E l e v e n Ca l c u l a t e d b y JR B HY D R O L O G Y M A N U A L 25 ‐ Y E A R S T O R M R A T I O N A L M E T H O D S T U D Y Ch e c k e d b y M a y 3 1 , 2 0 2 0 Co n c e n t r a t i o n S o i l D e v . T t T c I F m F m Q Fl o w P a t h Sl o p e V Hydraulics and Po i n t S u b a r e a T o t a l T y p e T y p e m i n . m i n . i n . / h r . i n . / h r . a v g . T o t a l Le n g t h ft . f t . / f t . f t . / s e c . N o t e s 9. 3 Subarea P1 P1 0 . 5 0 . 5 C C o m m 9 . 3 3 . 3 9 4 9 9 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 1 . 4 3 4 3 7 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 6 6 Q‐P1 7. 7 Subarea P2 P2 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 C C o m m 7 . 7 3 . 7 7 7 8 7 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 8 0 3 3 3 2 2 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 4 Q‐P 2 7. 5 Subarea P3 P3 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 C C o m m 7 . 5 3 . 8 3 4 5 6 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 6 8 5 5 1 2 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 5 Q‐P 3 8. 1 Subarea P4 P4 0 . 3 6 0 . 3 6 C C o m m 8 . 1 3 . 6 7 1 1 1 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 1 . 1 2 2 2 1 2 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 2 Q‐P 4 6. 8 Subarea P5 P5 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 C C o m m 6 . 8 4 . 0 5 3 2 2 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 4 8 4 5 6 1 6 0 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 9 Q‐P 5 5 Subarea P6 P6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 C C o m m 5 4 . 8 2 3 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 1 6 6 1 8 6 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 5 Q‐P6 Se l f T r e a t i n g 0. 3 5 Si t e T o t a l 1. 5 1 . 8 5 Or a n g e C o u n t y R a t i o n a l M e t h o d S t u d y F o r m . x l s x Pa g e 1 P r o p o s e d 2 5 y r Ar e a ( A c r e s ) Pr o p o s e d 2 5 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e P1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 P 6 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 1 0 . 3 6 0 . 1 4 0 . 0 4 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 4 2 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 7 0 . 3 0 0 . 1 2 0 . 0 3 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 0 9 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 1 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 3. 3 9 5 3 . 7 7 8 3 . 8 3 5 3 . 6 7 1 4 . 0 5 3 4 . 8 2 4 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 1. 4 3 4 0 . 8 0 3 0 . 6 8 6 1 . 1 2 2 0 . 4 8 5 0 . 1 6 6 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 37 0 2 2 0 2 0 5 2 6 0 1 6 0 6 5 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 1. 8 5 1 . 1 1 . 0 2 5 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 3 2 5 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 7 9 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 5 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 May 31, 2020 Pr o p o s e d 1 0 0 y r Ca l c u l a t i o n s Va r i a b l e S o u r c e P1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 P 6 A ( a c ) Se e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p ‐ T o t a l A r e a 0. 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 1 0 . 3 6 0 . 1 4 0 . 0 4 Ai ( a c ) P r o j e c t I m p e r v i o u s A r e a 0. 4 2 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 7 0 . 3 0 0 . 1 2 0 . 0 3 Ap ( a c ) P r o j e c t P e r v i o u s A r e a , [ A p = A ‐ A i ] 0. 0 9 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 1 So i l T y p e O C H M : S o i l M a p s h e e t A ( p e r h y d r o l o g y r e p o r t r e a s o n i n g ‐ t y p e C ) CC C C C C De v T y p e U s e K = v a l u e p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 [ c o m m e r c i a l = 0 . 9 0 ] 90 9 09 0 9 0 9 0 9 0 Tt ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 Tc ( m i n ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e D ‐ 1 9. 3 7 . 7 7 . 5 8 . 1 6 . 8 5 I ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , F i g u r e B ‐ 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ I ( t ) = a t ^ b ] ( s e e b e l o w ) 4. 3 3 6 4 . 8 3 1 4 . 9 0 5 4 . 6 9 3 5 . 1 8 8 6 . 1 8 7 Fm ( i n / h r ) p e r O C H M , S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 2 0 8 ap pe r O C H M p a g e C ‐ 1 3 . S e e a t t a c h e d c a l c u l a t i o n [ a p = A i / A t ] 0. 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 0 . 8 3 Fp pe r O C H M , t a b l e C . 2 ( s e e b e l o w ) 0. 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5 Fm A v e r a g e F m = F m A v e r a g e , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n C . 7 ( p a g e : C ‐ 1 3 ) , [ F m = a p * F p ] 0. 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 0 . 2 0 7 5 C pe r O C H M , e q u a t i o n D . 4 , [ C = 0 . 9 0 ] , r u n o f f c o e f f i c i e n t 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 Q ( c f s ) Q = v a l u e ( I ‐ F m ) A , p e r O C H M e q u a t i o n D . 4 [ Q = C I A , Q = C * ( I ‐ F m ) A ] 1. 8 5 8 1 . 0 4 0 0 . 8 8 8 1 . 4 5 3 0 . 6 2 8 0 . 2 1 5 Le n g t h ( f t ) L e n g t h o f D r a i n a g e F l o w , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y M a p 37 0 2 2 0 2 0 5 2 6 0 1 6 0 6 5 Sl o p e ( f t / f t ) A v e r a g e s l o p e , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p , [ H / L ] 0. 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 0 . 0 0 5 He i g h t ( f t ) D i f f e r e n c e i n e l e v a t i o n , S e e P r o p o s e d H y d r o l o g y m a p 1. 8 5 1 . 1 1 . 0 2 5 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 3 2 5 V ( f p s ) M e a n V e l o c i t y , [ V = Q / A ] 0. 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 . 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 1 2 4 Fi g u r e B ‐ 3 Table C.2 Ye a r s a b Soil Gp.Fp 2 5 . 7 0 2 ‐0 . 5 7 4 A 0 . 4 5 7 . 8 7 ‐0 . 5 6 2 B 0 . 3 10 1 0 . 2 0 9 ‐0 . 5 7 3 C 0 . 2 5 25 1 1 . 9 9 5 ‐0 . 5 6 6 D 0 . 2 50 1 3 . 5 2 1 ‐0 . 5 6 6 10 0 1 5 . 5 6 ‐0 . 5 7 3 Pa g e 2 May 31, 2020 V. INLET SIZING DATA Inlet capacity and sizing data is provided for common foundry type grated inlet types placed adjacent to curbs as well as Nyloplast type combination curb opening/grate inlets. The maximum ponding in each case is assumed to be 0.4ft. Inlet type recommendations are provided in this Preliminary Hydrologic Report for use in preparing the Preliminary Grading Design. The actual type of inlet facility will be determine during final design and shown on the Precise Grading Improvement Plan. VI. HABITABLE STRUCTURES PROTECTION The proposed on-site private storm drain design includes the use of storm drain inlets designed to operate with a maximum ponding depth of 0.4’ in a sump condition. Assuming that the proposed storm drain system fails due to clogging, ponding can be expected to occur at driveway entrances where ridge lines are required based on City of Anaheim Grading requirements and at each of the on-site storm drain inlet locations. During a failure of the on-site storm drain system, ponding would reach a maximum elevation of 102.0 at storm drain inlet 1 shown on the Anaheim 7-Eleven Hydrology Map included in the Appendix of this report. The proposed habitable 7-Eleven building is proposed to have a finish floor elevation of 103.10 providing 1.0 feet of freeboard. VII APPENDIX – REFERENCE MATERIAL DISP 2DISP 4 9DISP 6 10DISP 1DISP 3DISP 5111278 563412 4 YD4 YD FF F 4 Y D 4 Y D 100.8799.55 1 0 1 . 7 7 1 0 1 . 8 8 1 0 2 . 4 7 1 0 3 . 6 4 101.95100.89 1 0 4 . 5 1 1 0 7 . 4 5 100.92 E N G I N E E R I N G | P L A N N I N G | S U R V E Y | E N V I R O N M E N T A L 7 3 - 7 1 0 F r e d W a r i n g D r . , S t e . 2 1 9 P a l m D e s e r t , C A 9 2 2 6 0 t . 7 6 0 . 3 4 6 . 4 7 5 0 f . 7 6 0 . 3 4 0 . 0 0 8 9 T h e A l t u m G r o u p . c o m ORAN G E C O U N T Y ORAN G E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y 1. 0 5 0. 7 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.95 0 . 7 0 . 9 0. 9 0.75 P : \ 9 5 2 6 E \ 6 - G I S \ M x d s \ R e p o r t s \ I n f i l t r a t i o n F e a s a b i l i t y _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 \ 9 5 2 6 E _ F i g u r e X V I - 1 _ R a i n f a l l Z o n e s _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 . m x d FIGUREJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 miles DESIGNED DRAWING CHECKEDBMP04/22/10 DATE JOB NO.9526-E TH THORANGE COUNTY TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ORANGE CO.CARAINFALL ZONES SU B J E C T T O F U R T H E R R E V I S I O N 03 .67 .2 1. 8 Mi l e s 06 1 2 3 Ki l o m e t e r s LEGEND Orange County Precipitation Stations 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches)24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) - Extrapolated City Boundaries Rainfall Zones Design Capture Storm Depth (inches)0.65"0.7 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.10"Note: Events defined as 24-hour periods (calendar days) with gr eater than 0.1 inches of rainfall. For areas outside of available data coverage, professional judg ment shall be applied.XVI-1 Conceptual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Anaheim 7‐Eleven Golcheh Group Section VII Appendix G Exhibits ORAN G E C O U N T Y ORAN G E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y P : \ 9 5 2 6 E \ 6 - G I S \ M x d s \ R e p o r t s \ I n f i l t r a t i o n F e a s a b i l i t y _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 \ 9 5 2 6 E _ F i g u r e X V I - 2 a _ H y d r o S o i l s _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 . m x d FIGURE XVI-2aJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 miles DESIGNED DRAWING CHECKEDBMP02/09/11 DATE JOB NO.9526-E TH THORANGE COUNTY INFILTRATION STUDY ORANGE CO.CANRCS HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUPS SU B J E C T T O F U R T H E R R E V I S I O N Source: Soils: Natural Resources Co nservation Service (NRCS)Soil Survey - soil_ca678, Orange County & Western Riverside Date of publication: 2006-02-08 !I 03 .67 .2 1. 8 Mi l e s 05 1 0 2. 5 Ki l o m e t e r s LEGEND City Boundaries Hydrologic Soil Groups A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm P : \ 9 5 2 6 E \ 6 - G I S \ M x d s \ S u c e p t a b i l i t y M a p s _ 2 0 1 0 0 5 0 5 \ 9 5 2 6 E _ S a n t a A n a R i v e r S u s c e p t i b i l i t y _ 2 0 1 0 0 4 3 0 . m x d Cleveland National Forest Sa n B e r n a r d i n o Co u n t y Riverside County South Orange County Ne w p o r t B a y Wa t e r s h e d St a b i l i z e d b y Gr a d e C o n t r o l St r u c t u r e Sa n G a b r i e l - C o y o t e C r e e k Wa t e r s h e d An a h e i m Ba y - Hu n t i n g t o n Ha r b o r Wa t e r s h e d Pe t e r s Ca n y o n Re s e r v o i r Ol i v e Hi l l s Kr a e m e r Ba s i n Ca r b o n Ca n y o n Wa l n u t Ca n y o n Re s e r v o i r Ir v i n e La k e An a h e i m La k e Wa r n e r Ba s i n Mi l l e r Re t a r d i n g Ba s i n Ba r t l e t t Re t a r d i n g Ba s i n Fl e t c h e r Re t a r d i n g Ba s i n SO U T H P A R K PU M P ST A T I O N Vi l l a Pa r k D a m Yo r b a L i n d a Re s e r v o i r So u r c e s : E s r i , D e L o r m e , N A V T E Q , U S G S , I n t e r m a p , i P C , N R C A N , E s r i Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2012FIGURE 3JOBTITLESCALE1" = 12000'DESIGNED DRAWING CHECKEDBMP04/30/10 DATE JOB NO.9526-E TH THORANGE COUNTY WATERSHED MASTER PLANNING ORANGE CO.CASUSCEPTIBILITY ANALYIS SANTA ANA RIVER !I 0 12,000 24,000Feet Su s c e p t i b i l i t y Po t e n t i a l A r e a s o f E r o s i o n , H a b i t a t , & Ph y s i c a l S t r u c t u r e S u s c e p t i b i l i t y Ch a n n e l T y p e Ea r t h ( U n s t a b l e ) Ea r t h ( S t a b i l i z e d ) St a b i l i z e d Ti d e l I n f l u e n c e <= M e a n H i g h W a t e r L i n e ( 4 . 2 8 ' ) Wa t e r B o d y Ba s i n Da m La k e Re s e r v o i r Fo r e s t A r e a s Cl e v e l a n d N a t i o n a l F o r e s t Fe d e r a l L a n d s Am a r u s S a l t M a r s h Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ,USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom,2012SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP UPATE (FEB 2013) Veneklasen Associates Consultants in Acoustics | Noise | Vibration | AV | IT 1711 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica California 90404 • tel: 310.450.1733 • fax: 310.396.3424 • www.veneklasen.com November 25, 2020 Golcheh Group 1180 Beverly Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90035 Attention: Ilan Golcheh | President Subject: East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study VA Project No. 7431-001 Dear Ilan: Veneklasen Associates, Inc. (Veneklasen) was contracted to perform an acoustical study to evaluate the proposed East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash project in Anaheim, California. This study includes an assessment of the existing and future sound levels as caused by traffic, car wash activity, and any mechanical equipment for the convenience store compared to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. This report documents our findings. A list of acoustical terms and their definitions is presented in Appendix A. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following report contains the results of an acoustical study conducted for the East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash in Anaheim, California. The project consists of a future convenience store and car wash which i ncludes mechanical equipment for the convenience store and washing machines, blowers and sprayers for the car wash tunnel. An exterior area with a vacuum system is also included with a canopy structure. The hours of operation are understood to be Monday through Sunday, 7:00am to 9:00pm for the car wash portion, which generates the most amount of noise at the site. 2.0 NOISE CRITERIA The City of Anaheim Municipal Code establishes a noise ordinance in Chapter 6.70. This ordinance regulates various types of noise sources and establishes sound level limits for those sources. Section 6.70.010 states the following: “No person shall within the City create any sound radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces a sound pressure level at any point on the property line in excess of sixty [60] decibels…read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. Readings shall be taken in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s instructions, using the slowest meter response.” Section 6.70.010 also states the following: “At any point, the measured level shall be the average of three (3) readings taken at two (2) minute intervals. To have valid readings, the levels must be five (5) decibels or more above the levels prevailing at the same point when the source(s) of the alleged objectionable sound are not operating.” Veneklasen has interpreted this language to indicate that if the existing ambient noise level matches or exceeds the 60 dBA limit established by the ordinance, then the new maximum allowable exterior standard would become 5 dBA above the existing ambient noise level. Veneklasen will utilize this interpretation to assess compliance of the future project with the noise ordinance as established by the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. ATTACHMENT NO. 7 Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 2 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 2 of 10 www.veneklasen.com 3.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC AND EQUIPMENT SOUND MEASUREMENTS Sound measurements were conducted at the proposed project site to capture existing ambient noise levels on July 15, 2019. Shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 below. These acoustical measurements were conducted with Brüel & Kjær Type 2270 sound level meters, which conform to ANSI S.14-1961 for Type 1 precision sound level meters and were conducted using Brüel & Kjær Type 4189 microphones. Figure 1 – Project Site Location Table 1 – Existing Ambient Noise Measurements Location Time Daytime Hour Leq (dBA) S1 1:00 PM 70 S2 68 Veneklasen does not anticipate a significant variation in the overall level during the evening hours due to the project site’s proximity to Highway 57 and the significant traffic volume along Ball Road. Based on previous measurements completed by Veneklasen, statistical analysis, and traffic patterns, we expect the noise levels to be similar throughout daytime and evening hours. This is primarily due to an increase in free-flowing traffic along Highway 57 during the evening hours, which results in higher noise levels as caused by tire noise. In addition, Veneklasen utilized sound measurements conducted for a previous project at an existing Rapid Express Car Wash at 2045 North Tustin Street in Orange, California on July 30, 2019. Measurements were performed on the blowers, water sprayers, rotating brushes and central vacuum. The sound levels for each source were measured independently to determine the levels of each piece of equipment that could be used to incorporate into the computer model. All of the acoustical measurements of the equipment were conducted with an NTi XL2 sound level meter, which conforms to ANSI S.14-1961 for Type 1 precision sound level meters. All measurement equipment was field-calibrated before use. A summary of measured noise levels from the car wash mechanical equipment is shown in Table 2. Table 2 – Car Wash Equipment Noise Measurement Results Equipment Distance, ft Leq (dBA) Blowers 5 101 Water Sprayers 5 85 Rotating Brushes 5 89 Central Vacuum 3 80 Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 3 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 3 of 10 www.veneklasen.com 4.0 NOISE MODELING, ANALYSIS, AND RESULTS From the measurement data and provided specifications, Veneklasen has utilized the Brüel & Kjær Predictor computer software program in order to predict sound levels at various locations around the project site. Sound exposure due to the proposed building geometry for the car wash and convenience store was modeled based on drawings provided by the Client. Traffic counts for local roadways were obtained from the Orange County Transportation Authority. Traffic for the Highway 57 exit ramp were obtained from the California Department of Transportation. The latest traffic counts available for Ball Road were from 2015. Since this does not represent current conditions, Veneklasen modified the modeled counts to align with the measurements completed at the project site. Once the measured and modeled existing sound levels due to traffic noise matched, the project was assessed. There is an existing 6-foot wall between the project site and sensitive receptors to the north. Client informed Veneklasen that a new 8-foot wall is planned to be installed in order to improve the shielding effect. The planned 8-foot wall at the property line, vacuum canopies, the car wash tunnel itself, along with a new 9-foot tall, 25-foot long wall at the car wash tunnel exit were included in the computer model. The measured sound level data summarized in Table 2 was used to model the car wash equipment. Veneklasen also used published sound power data for the two (2) Carrier 48HC-D08 rooftop units scheduled on the roof of the convenience store. Sound power data for this equipment was taken from Carrier’s published datasheet. Lastly, car idling was included for the queue when entering the car wash tunnel. 4.1 Existing Noise Levels Without Project Figure 2 shows the existing noise levels around the project site due to traffic noise only, primarily caused by traffic flow along Ball Road and Highway 57. The first number at each receiver indicates the noise level at 1st floor, while the second number indicates the noise level at the 2nd floor. Since the 2nd floor of sensitive receptors to the north have direct line of sight to the roadway over the barrier, the noise levels as shown are slightly higher than the 1st floor levels. The levels shown are representative of the property line closest to the convenience store and car wash equipment sources. The levels are further summarized in Table 3. Figure 2 – Predicted Existing Noise Levels, Traffic Only. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 4 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 4 of 10 www.veneklasen.com As can be seen by the results of the model without the project, the existing ambient noise levels as caused by traffic only from Ball Road and the Highway 57 exit ramp are 57 to 60 dBA at the 1st floor and 60 to 66 dBA at the 2nd floor. Per Veneklasen’s interpretation of the Municipal Code in section 2.0, this would establish the maximum allowable level as caused by the convenience store and car wash operations to be 60 to 65 dBA at the 1st floor and 65 to 71 dBA at the 2nd floor. 4.2 Future Noise Levels with the Project Figure 3 shows the predicted sound levels as caused by the proposed convenience store and car wash with planned equipment (vacuums, washers, blowers, rooftop equipment) operational. Within the design, Veneklasen has assumed an 8-foot tall barrier along the back property line, a 9-foot tall, 25-foot long barrier at the exit of the car wash tunnel near the blowers, a 5-foot barrier to shield from future RTUs at the roof of the convenience store, and cars idling at the car wash queue as shown in Figure 3. A summary of the sound levels is also included in Table 3. All inputs utilized for the model can be seen within the various appendices at the end of the report. Figure 3 – Predicted Noise Levels, Traffic and Equipment Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 5 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 5 of 10 www.veneklasen.com Table 3 – Comparison of Modeled Noise Levels with Municipal Code Limits Receiver Floor Modeled Existing Level (Traffic Only), dBA Modeled Future Level (Traffic + Equipment + Car Idling), dBA Municipal Code Noise Level Criterion, dBA Municipal Code Compliance R1 1st 58 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 63 ≤ 65 Yes R2 1st 57 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 63 ≤ 65 Yes R3 1st 57 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 63 ≤ 65 Yes R4 1st 57 58 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 60 62 ≤ 65 Yes R5 1st 58 58 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 62 61 ≤ 67 Yes R6 1st 58 58 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 63 62 ≤ 68 Yes R7 1st 59 59 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 64 64 ≤ 69 Yes R8 1st 60 60 ≤ 65 Yes 2nd 66 66 ≤ 71 Yes As can be seen within Figure 3 per the modeling as described, resultant level of the car wash and convenience store operation at all receivers for both the 1st and 2nd floors meets minimum Municipal Code requirements established in Section 3.0. Further, this establishes that the sound levels as contributed by the convenience store and car wash equipment by itself, without the contribution of traffic noise along Ball Road, would be less than or equal to 59 dBA at both the 1st and 2nd floors of the property line. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Veneklasen provides the following comments and conclusions regarding the acoustical study for the addition of the convenience store and car wash as it relates to the noise ordinance within the City of Anaheim Municipal Code: • A 9-foot barrier at approximately 25 feet long should be constructed along the tunnel exit as shown in Figure 3. • An 8-foot barrier should be constructed at the back of the property as shown in Figure 3. • A 5-foot barrier wall should be constructed on the roof of the convenience store as shown in Figure 3 to block line-of-sight to the mechanical equipment. This also aids in shielding from traffic noise. • All barrier walls should be constructed out of a solid material (i.e . no holes, openings, or gaps) with a minimum 2-inch thickness. Given the mitigation measures described herein: • The predicted sound levels at both the 1st and 2nd floor sensitive receptors along the property lines of nearest sensitive receptors are in compliance with the noise ordinance established by the City of Anaheim Municipal Code as shown in Table 3. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 6 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 6 of 10 www.veneklasen.com Therefore, this report finds that the impact on the residences will fall within the noise ordinance per the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The noise at the property line to the north is primarily dominated by existing traffic along Ball Road and the Highway 57 ramp, and modeled levels are compliant with the City’s requirements. Furthermore, the anticipated sound levels per Table 3 represent a worst-case scenario of all equipment in operation simultaneously, and the actual sound levels on-site as caused by the convenience store and car wash are anticipated to be lower than those indicated herein. No further mitigation is required for the project, beyond the barrier walls established herein, to comply with the Municipal Code requirements for noise established by the City of Anaheim, as the construction of the tunnel itself and various barrier utilized in the project’s design provide adequate shielding of noise to nearest receptors to comply with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Veneklasen Associates, Inc. Chris Kezon Elias Montoya Senior Associate Associate Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 7 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 7 of 10 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX A – GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS Term Definition Decibel (dB) A unit describing the amplitude of sound in a logarithmic ratio to a reference value. A-weighted Decibels (dBA) A filter applied to sound pressure levels in decibel to simulate the response of the human ear at the threshold of hearing. A-weighting de-emphasizes the low frequency components of a sound similar to the human ear at these levels. This metric has been closely tied to subjective reactions of annoyance to noise, and is used as a noise metric in this and in many other environmental acoustics reports. In this report, all dBA levels reported refer to the sound pressure level, referenced to 20µPa Sound Pressure Level (Lp) The amplitude of sound compared to the reference value of 20µPa. Sound Pressure Level is what we perceive as audible sound. Sound Pressure Level decreases as distance from the source to the receiver increases. Sound Power Level (Lw) The amplitude of sound compared to the reference value of 1pW. Sound Power Level does not vary with distance, and represents the level of sound emitted by a given source. The sound power level is generally used to model the sound pressure level of a source at a given distance or location. Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) The time-weighted average sound or vibration level for a given period of time. Use of this metric allows the observation of the overall sound level for the measurement period. Maximum Sound Level (Lmax) The instantaneous maximum sound or vibration level of an event. The Lmax can occur over very short periods of time, and fluctuates much more than the Leq due to the presence of intermittent events in the noise environment. Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) The time-weighted noise level representing the noise exposure over a 24-hour period. Noise events that occur within the evening hours (7pm to 10pm) are given a +5dB penalty, and noise events that occur within the nighttime hours (10pm to 7am) are given a +10dB penalty, to account for increased sensitivity to noise during these hours. This metric has units of A-weighted decibels, and has been correlated to probability of annoyance. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 8 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 8 of 10 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX B – EQUIPMENT SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Table 4 – Measured Octave Band Sound Pressure Level for Car Wash Equipment, dB Equipment Distance, ft One-Octave Frequency Band in Hz (dB) Leq Global(dBA) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Blowers 5 58 76 87 96 97 95 88 79 101 Water Sprayers 5 51 64 72 79 82 81 79 75 87 Rotating Brushes 5 40 55 68 74 74 75 71 67 89 Central Vacuum (in) 3 60 68 75 84 85 83 78 70 90 Central Vacuum (out) 3 50 57 65 74 72 71 65 57 78 Vacuum Stations 3 45 49 56 63 69 73 70 64 76 Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 9 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 9 of 10 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX C – MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND ESTIMATED CAR IDLING SOUND POWER LEVELS Table 5 – Octave Band Sound Power Level, dB Equipment One-Octave Frequency Band in Hz (dB) Lw Global(dBA) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Carrier 48HC-D08 90.6 84.3 80.2 79.3 77.1 72.2 67.4 63.7 92 Car idling* 71.3 65.6 59.2 57.8 57.9 56.4 54.3 48.8 63 * Data for car idling obtained from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Median value was selected to represent typical conditions. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 10 of 10 Month Day, Year; Page 10 of 10 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX D – TRAFFIC COUNTS Table 6 – Traffic Counts for Modeling Roadway Year of Latest Count AADT Ball Road* 2013 52,000 Sunkist Street* Over 10yrs 14,000 Highway 57 Exit Ramp** 2015 16,756 * Obtained from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) ** Obtained from the California Department of Transportation (CADOT) Veneklasen Associates Consultants in Acoustics | Noise | Vibration | AV | IT 1711 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica California 90404 • tel: 310.450.1733 • fax: 310.396.3424 • www.veneklasen.com November 25, 2020 Golcheh Group 1180 Beverly Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90035 Attention: Ilan Golcheh | President Subject: East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study VA Project No. 7431-001 Dear Ilan: Veneklasen Associates, Inc. (Veneklasen) was contracted to perform an acoustical study to evaluate the proposed East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash project in Anaheim, California. This study includes an assessment of the existing and future sound levels as caused by traffic, car wash activity, and any mechanical equipment for the convenience store compared to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. This report documents our findings. A list of acoustical terms and their definitions is presented in Appendix A. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following report contains the results of an acoustical study conducted for the East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash in Anaheim, California. The project consists of a future convenience store and car wash which i ncludes mechanical equipment for the convenience store and washing machines, blowers and sprayers for the car wash tunnel. An exterior area with a vacuum system is also included with a canopy structure. The hours of operation will be Monday through Sunday, 7am to 9pm. 2.0 NOISE CRITERIA The City of Anaheim Municipal Code establishes a noise ordinance in Chapter 6.70. This ordinance regulates various types of noise sources and establishes sound level limits for those sources. Section 6.70.010 states the following: “No person shall within the City create any sound radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces a sound pressure level at any point on the property line in excess of sixty [60] decibels…read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. Readings shall be taken in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s instructions, using the slowest meter response.” Section 6.70.010 also states the following: “Traffic sounds, sound created by emergency activities and sound created by governmental units or their contractors shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter.” Veneklasen has interpreted this language to indicate that the levels as caused by the project must not exceed 60 dBA during operation, excluding the influence of any existing traffic noise. Based on this interpretation, traffic noise from Ball Road, Sunkist Street and the Highway 57 exit ramp is not included in the modeling. Only noise generated by the future project itself is taken into account and must comply with the 60 dBA requirement established in the Municipal Code. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 2 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 2 of 7 www.veneklasen.com 3.0 EQUIPMENT SOUND MEASUREMENTS Veneklasen utilized sound measurements conducted for a previous project at an existing Rapid Express Car Wash at 2045 North Tustin Street in Orange, California on July 30, 2019. Measurements were performed on the blowers, water sprayers, rotating brushes and central vacuum. The sound levels for each source were measured independently to determine the levels of each piece of equipment that could be used to incorporate into the computer model. All of the acoustical measurements of the equipment were conducted with an NTi XL2 sound level meter, which conforms to ANSI S.14-1961 for Type 1 precision sound level meters. All measurement equipment was field-calibr ated before use. A summary of measured noise levels from the car wash mechanical equipment is shown in Table 1. Table 1 – Car Wash Equipment Noise Measurement Results Equipment Distance, ft Leq (dBA) Blowers 5 101 Water Sprayers 5 85 Rotating Brushes 5 89 Central Vacuum 3 80 4.0 NOISE MODELING, ANALYSIS, AND RESULTS From the measurement data and provided specifications, Veneklasen has utilized the Brüel & Kjær Predictor computer software program in order to predict sound levels at various locations around the project site. Sound exposure due to the proposed building geometry for the car wash and convenience store was modeled based on drawings provided by the Client. There is an existing 6-foot wall between the project site and sensitive receptors to the north. Client informed Veneklasen that a new 8-foot wall is planned to be installed in order to improve the shielding effect. The planned 8-foot wall at the property line, vacuum canopies, the car wash tunnel itself, along with a new 9-foot tall, 25-foot long wall at the car wash tunnel exit were included in the computer model. The measured sound level data summarized in Table 1 was used to model the car wash equipment. Veneklasen also used published sound power data for the two (2) Carrier 48HC-D08 rooftop units scheduled on the roof of the convenience store. Sound power data for this equipment was taken from Carrier’s published datasheet. Lastly, car idling was included for the queue when entering the car wash tunnel. 4.1 Future Noise Levels with the Project Figure 1 shows the predicted sound levels as caused by the proposed convenience store and car wash with planned equipment (vacuums, washers, blowers, rooftop equipment) operational. As described in section 2.0, traffic noise has been excluded from the modeling since the project is to comply with the City’s 60 dBA requirement without the influence of existing noise sources already present at the site. The first number at each receiver indicates the noise level at 1st floor, while the second number indicates the noise level at the 2nd floor. Since the 2nd floor of sensitive receptors to the north have direct line of sight over the barrier, the noise levels as shown are slightly higher than the 1st floor levels. The levels shown are representative of the property line closest to the convenience store and car wash equipment sources. All modeled levels at sensitive receptors are equal to or lower than the values shown in Figure 1. The levels are further summarized in Table 2. Within the design, Veneklasen has assumed an 8-foot tall barrier along the back property line, a 9-foot tall, 25-foot long barrier at the exit of the car wash tunnel near the blowers, a 5-foot barrier to shield from future RTUs at the roof of the convenience store, and cars idling at the car wash queue as shown in Figure 1. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 3 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 3 of 7 www.veneklasen.com A summary of the sound levels is also included in Table 2. All inputs utilized for the model can be seen within the various appendices at the end of the report. Figure 1 – Predicted Noise Levels with Equipment Table 2 – Comparison of Modeled Noise Levels with Municipal Code Limits Receiver Floor Modeled Future Level (Equipment + Car Idling), dBA Municipal Code Noise Level Criterion, dBA Municipal Code Compliance R1 1st 52 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 56 ≤ 60 Yes R2 1st 54 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 58 ≤ 60 Yes R3 1st 53 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 59 ≤ 60 Yes R4 1st 52 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 57 ≤ 60 Yes R5 1st 51 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 55 ≤ 60 Yes R6 1st 49 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 55 ≤ 60 Yes R7 1st 46 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 53 ≤ 60 Yes R8 1st 49 ≤ 60 Yes 2nd 56 ≤ 60 Yes As can be seen within Figure 1 and Table 2 per the modeling as described, resultant noise levels of the car wash and convenience store operation at all receivers for both the 1st and 2nd floors meet minimum Municipal Code requirements of 60 dBA per section 2.0. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 4 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 4 of 7 www.veneklasen.com 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Veneklasen provides the following comments and conclusions regarding the acoustical study for the addition of the convenience store and car wash as it relates to the noise ordinance within the City of Anaheim Municipal Code: • A 9-foot barrier at approximately 25 feet long should be constructed along the tunnel exit as shown in Figure 1. • An 8-foot barrier should be constructed at the back of the property as shown in Figure 1. • A 5-foot barrier wall should be constructed on the roof of the convenience store to block line-of-sight to the mechanical equipment as shown in Figure 1. • All barrier walls should be constructed out of a solid material (i.e. no holes, openings, or gaps) with a minimum 2-inch thickness. Given the mitigation measures described herein: • The predicted sound levels at both the 1st and 2nd floor sensitive receptors along the property lines of nearest sensitive receptors are in compliance with the noise ordinance established by the City of Anaheim Municipal Code as shown in Table 2. Furthermore, the anticipated sound levels per Table 2 represent a worst-case scenario of all equipment in operation simultaneously, and the actual sound levels on-site as caused by the convenience store and car wash are anticipated to be lower than those indicated herein. No further mitigation is required for the project, beyond the barrier walls established herein, to comply with the Municipal Code requirements for noise established by the City of Anaheim, as the construction of the tunnel itself and various barrier utilized in the project’s design provide adequate shielding of noise to nearest receptors to comply with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Veneklasen Associates, Inc. Chris Kezon Elias Montoya Senior Associate Associate Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 5 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 5 of 7 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX A – GLOSSARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMS Term Definition Decibel (dB) A unit describing the amplitude of sound in a logarithmic ratio to a reference value. A-weighted Decibels (dBA) A filter applied to sound pressure levels in decibel to simulate the response of the human ear at the threshold of hearing. A-weighting de-emphasizes the low frequency components of a sound similar to the human ear at these levels. This metric has been closely tied to subjective reactions of annoyance to noise, and is used as a noise metric in this and in many other environmental acoustics reports. In this report, all dBA levels reported refer to the sound pressure level, referenced to 20µPa Sound Pressure Level (Lp) The amplitude of sound compared to the reference value of 20µPa. Sound Pressure Level is what we perceive as audible sound. Sound Pressure Level decreases as distance from the source to the receiver increases. Sound Power Level (Lw) The amplitude of sound compared to the reference value of 1pW. Sound Power Level does not vary with distance, and represents the level of sound emitted by a given source. The sound power level is generally used to model the sound pressure level of a source at a given distance or location. Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) The time-weighted average sound or vibration level for a given period of time. Use of this metric allows the observation of the overall sound level for the measurement period. Maximum Sound Level (Lmax) The instantaneous maximum sound or vibration level of an event. The Lmax can occur over very short periods of time, and fluctuates much more than the Leq due to the presence of intermittent events in the noise environment. Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) The time-weighted noise level representing the noise exposure over a 24-hour period. Noise events that occur within the evening hours (7pm to 10pm) are given a +5dB penalty, and noise events that occur within the nighttime hours (10pm to 7am) are given a +10dB penalty, to account for increased sensitivity to noise during these hours. This metric has units of A-weighted decibels, and has been correlated to probability of annoyance. Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 6 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 6 of 7 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX B – EQUIPMENT SOUND LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Table 3 – Measured Octave Band Sound Pressure Level for Car Wash Equipment, dB Equipment Distance, ft One-Octave Frequency Band in Hz (dB) Leq Global(dBA) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Blowers 5 58 76 87 96 97 95 88 79 101 Water Sprayers 5 51 64 72 79 82 81 79 75 87 Rotating Brushes 5 40 55 68 74 74 75 71 67 89 Central Vacuum (in) 3 60 68 75 84 85 83 78 70 90 Central Vacuum (out) 3 50 57 65 74 72 71 65 57 78 Vacuum Stations 3 45 49 56 63 69 73 70 64 76 Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Property Line Noise Study; VA Project No. 7431-001 November 25, 2020; Page 7 of 7 Month Day, Year; Page 7 of 7 www.veneklasen.com APPENDIX C – MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND ESTIMATED CAR IDLING SOUND POWER LEVELS Table 4 – Octave Band Sound Power Level, dB Equipment One-Octave Frequency Band in Hz (dB) Lw Global(dBA) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Carrier 48HC-D08 90.6 84.3 80.2 79.3 77.1 72.2 67.4 63.7 92 Car idling* 71.3 65.6 59.2 57.8 57.9 56.4 54.3 48.8 63 * Data for car idling obtained from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Median value of all vehicle samples was selected to represent typical conditions, and sound power data wa s calculated based on free-field conditions during the measurements performed by USDOT NHTSA. 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 <UNHIDDEN> prepared by Bryan Crawford Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana, California 92705 714.795.3100 | www.ganddini.com 19-0202 BALL-SUNKIST 7-ELEVEN & CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Anaheim August 26, 2020 3 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis i 19-0202 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Description ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Analysis Scenarios ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology..................................................................................................... 4 Intersection Delay Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 4 Performance Standards .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Need for Improvements ............................................................................................................................................. 5 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Roadway System .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Pedestrian Facilities ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Bicycle Routes .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Transit Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Truck Routes ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 General Plan Context .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Existing (2018) Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................................... 7 Existing ICU/Delay and Level of Service ................................................................................................................ 8 4. PROJECT TRIP FORECASTS ............................................................................................................................. 20 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................................... 20 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ........................................................................................................... 20 5. FUTURE VOLUME FORECASTS ...................................................................................................................... 29 Cumulative Trips ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 Ambient Growth Rate .................................................................................................................................. 29 Other Development ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Analysis Scenario Volume Forecasts .................................................................................................................... 29 Existing Plus Project ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Existing Plus Cumulative .............................................................................................................................. 29 Opening Year Without Project ................................................................................................................... 29 Opening Year With Project ......................................................................................................................... 30 6. FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 48 Existing Plus Project ................................................................................................................................................. 48 Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................................................................................... 48 Operational Impact Evaluation ................................................................................................................... 48 Existing Plus Cumulative ......................................................................................................................................... 48 Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................................................................................... 48 Opening Year Without Project .............................................................................................................................. 49 Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................................................................................... 49 Opening Year With Project .................................................................................................................................... 49 Intersection Levels of Service ..................................................................................................................... 49 Operational Impact Evaluation ................................................................................................................... 49 7. ON-SITE PARKING AND QUEUING ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 56 Municipal Code Off-Street Parking Requirements ............................................................................................ 56 Car Wash Parking Demand Analysis .................................................................................................................... 56 4 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis ii 19-0202 Parking Demand and Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 57 Queuing Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 57 Vacuum Parking Stalls .............................................................................................................................................. 58 8. VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ............................................................................................................... 62 Background ................................................................................................................................................................ 62 VMT Assessment and Screening ........................................................................................................................... 62 9. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 63 Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................................................................ 63 On-Site Parking and Queuing ................................................................................................................................ 63 General Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 63 APPENDICES Appendix A Glossary Appendix B Scoping Agreement Appendix C Volume Count Worksheets Appendix D Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E Parking and Queuing Data 5 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis iii 19-0202 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Existing Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................................................................ 9 Table 2. Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................... 21 Table 3. Other Development Trip Generation ....................................................................................................... 31 Table 4. Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service .............................................................................. 50 Table 5. Existing Plus Project Significant Impact Evaluation ............................................................................... 51 Table 6. Existing Plus Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service....................................................................... 52 Table 7. Opening Year Without Project Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................... 53 Table 8. Opening Year With Project Intersection Levels of Service .................................................................. 54 Table 9. Opening Year With Project Significant Impact Evaluation ................................................................... 55 Table 10. Weekday Vehicle Queue and Parking Demand Survey ........................................................................ 59 Table 11. Saturday Vehicle Queue and Parking Demand Survey ......................................................................... 60 Table 12. Drive Through Car Wash Lane Queuing Analysis ................................................................................. 61 6 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis iv 19-0202 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location Map ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Site Plan .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3. Existing Lane Geometry and Intersection Traffic Controls .................................................................. 10 Figure 4. Existing Pedestrian Facilities ....................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 5. City of Anaheim Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities ....................................................................... 12 Figure 6. City of Anaheim Transit Routes ................................................................................................................. 13 Figure 7. City of Anaheim Truck Route Map ............................................................................................................ 14 Figure 8. City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element ............................................................................... 15 Figure 9. City of Anaheim General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections ...................................................................... 16 Figure 10. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................... 17 Figure 11. Existing AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ................................................... 18 Figure 12. Existing PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .................................................... 19 Figure 13. Project Outbound Trip Distribution .......................................................................................................... 22 Figure 14. Project Inbound Trip Distribution .............................................................................................................. 23 Figure 15. Project Outbound Pass-By Trip Distribution .......................................................................................... 24 Figure 16. Project Inbound Pass-By Trip Distribution .............................................................................................. 25 Figure 17. Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................................... 26 Figure 18. Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .................................................... 27 Figure 19. Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................................................... 28 Figure 20. Other Development Location Map ........................................................................................................... 32 Figure 21. Other Development Average Daily Traffic Volumes............................................................................. 33 Figure 22. Other Development AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................ 34 Figure 23. Other Development PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................. 35 Figure 24. Existing Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes............................................................................. 36 Figure 25. Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................ 37 Figure 26. Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ............................. 38 Figure 27. Existing Plus Cumulative Average Daily Traffic Volumes ..................................................................... 39 Figure 28. Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes..................... 40 Figure 29. Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..................... 41 Figure 30. Opening Year Without Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes .......................................................... 42 Figure 31. Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.......... 43 Figure 32. Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .......... 44 Figure 33. Opening Year With Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes ................................................................ 45 Figure 34. Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ................ 46 Figure 35. Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ................ 47 7 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis ES-1 19-0202 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this analysis is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash project and to identify measures necessary to mitigate potentially significant traffic impacts. This report analyzes traffic impacts for the anticipated project opening year in 2021. Although this is a technical report, effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A glossary of terms is provided in Appendix A to assist the reader with terms related to transportation engineering. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at the northeast corner of Sunkist Street and Ball Road in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project involves demolishing the existing 20,200 square feet of commercial retail and replacing it with a gasoline/service station with 12 vehicle fueling positions, convenience market, and an automated car wash. The proposed project is anticipated to be constructed and fully operational by year 2021. EXISTING OPERATIONS The study intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing conditions (see Table 1). PROJECT TRIPS The proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 102 net new trips during the AM peak hour, 124 net new trips during the PM peak hour, and 1,507 net new daily trips (see Table 2). FORECAST TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Existing Plus Project: The study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour (see Table 4): Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although these intersections are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour, additional mitigation is not recommended for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience any delay. These southbound right turning vehicles can queue within the project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right turning vehicles during the PM peak hour is 47.37 feet for the project west driveway and 23.17 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. 8 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis ES-2 19-0202 Based on the established operational thresholds, the proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions (see Table 5). Existing Plus Cumulative: The study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Cumulative conditions (see Table 6). Opening Year Without Project: The study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year Without Project conditions (see Table 7). Opening Year With Project: The study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year With Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour (see Table 8): Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS F) Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although these intersections are forecast to operate at Level of Service E/F during the PM peak hour, additional improvements are not recommended for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience any delay. These southbound right turning vehicles can queue within the project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right turning vehicles during the PM peak hour is 52.25 feet for the project west driveway and 25.34 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. The proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for Opening Year With Project conditions (see Table 9). NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS No off-site improvements were identified since the proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for the scenarios analyzed. ON-SITE PARKING AND QUEUING Sufficient off-street parking is provided for both the gasoline station/convenience market and the car wash components of the proposed project. Adequate drive through car wash lane queuing capacity is anticipated to be provided for the project site. The position of the vacuum parking stalls perpendicular to the east-west drive aisle and the car wash tunnel appears to be sufficient, and redesign (such as angled parking of these vacuum parking stalls) does not appear to be necessary. 9 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 1 19-0202 1. INTRODUCTION This section describes the purpose of this analysis, project description, study area, and analysis scenarios. Figure 1 shows the project location map and Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this analysis is to provide an assessment of traffic operations resulting from development of the proposed Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash project and to identify measures necessary to mitigate potentially significant traffic impacts. This report analyzes traffic impacts for the anticipated project opening year in 2021. Although this is a technical report, effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. A glossary of terms is provided in Appendix A to assist the reader with terms related to transportation engineering. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at the northeast corner of Sunkist Street and Ball Road in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project involves demolishing the existing 20,200 square feet of commercial retail and replacing it with a 12 fueling position gasoline/service station with convenience market and an automated car wash. The proposed project is anticipated to be constructed and fully operational by year 2021. STUDY AREA Based on the study intersections identified in the approved scoping agreement (Appendix B), the study area consists of the following study intersections within the City of Anaheim and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) jurisdictions: Study Intersections Jurisdiction 1. Sunkist Street (NS) at Project Driveway (EW) City of Anaheim 2. Sunkist Street (NS) at Ball Road (EW) City of Anaheim 3. Project West Driveway (NS) at Ball Road (EW) City of Anaheim 4. Project East Driveway (NS) at Ball Road (EW) City of Anaheim 5. SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Road (EW) California Department of Transportation 6. SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Road (EW) California Department of Transportation ANALYSIS SCENARIOS The following scenarios are analyzed for weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions: Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project Conditions Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions Opening Year Without Project Conditions Opening Year With Project Conditions 110 F i g u r e 1 P r o j e c t L o c a t i o n M a p B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 5 7 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# S i t e 2 1 1 F i g u r e 2 S i t e P l a n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N 3 1 2 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 4 19-0202 2. METHODOLOGY This section discusses the analysis methodologies used to assess transportation facility performance as adopted by the respective jurisdictional agencies. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION METHODOLOGY Analysis of signalized intersections within the City of Anaheim is based on the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The ICU methodology compares the traffic volume using the intersection to the capacity of the intersection. The resulting volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity. The volume-to-capacity ratio is then correlated to a performance measure known as Level of Service based on the following thresholds: Level of Service Volume/Capacity Ratio A ≤ 0.600 B 0.601 to 0.700 C 0.701 to 0.800 D 0.801 to 0.900 E 0.901 to 1.000 F > 1.000 Source: Transportation Research Board, Interim Materials on Highway Capacity, Transportation Research Circular No. 212, January 1980. Level of Service is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from Level of Service A (free-flow conditions) to Level of Service F (extreme congestion and system failure). ICU analysis was performed using the Vistro (Version 6.00-03) software. Based on City of Anaheim guidelines1, the ICU analysis utilizes the following parameters: 1,700 vehicles per hour per lane and a total clearance adjustment of 5 percent (i.e., 0.05 added to critical Volume/Capacity). INTERSECTION DELAY METHODOLOGY The technique used to assess the performance of unsignalized intersections and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) facilities is known as the intersection delay methodology based on the procedures contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 6th Edition). The methodology considers the traffic volume and distribution of movements, traffic composition, geometric characteristics, and signalization details to calculate the average control delay per vehicle and corresponding Level of Service. Control delay is defined as the portion of delay attributed to the intersection traffic control (such as a traffic signal or stop sign) and includes initial deceleration, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The intersection control delay is then correlated to Level of Service based on the following thresholds: 1 City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Studies Criteria; date unspecified. 413 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 5 19-0202 Level of Service Intersection Control Delay (Seconds/Vehicle) Unsignalized Intersection A ≤ 10.0 B > 10.0 to ≤ 15.0 C > 15.0 to ≤ 25.0 D > 25.0 to ≤ 35.0 E > 35.0 to ≤ 50.0 F > 50.0 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition). Level of Service is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging from Level of Service A (free-flow conditions) to Level of Service F (extreme congestion and system failure). At intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, Level of Service is determined by the average control delay for the overall intersection. At intersections with cross street stop control (i.e., one- or two-way stop control), Level of Service is determined by the average control delay for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane). Intersection delay analysis was performed using the Vistro (Version 6.00-03) software based on default values recommended in the Highway Capacity Manual. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The City of Anaheim has established Level of Service D as the minimum acceptable Level of Service. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) endeavors to maintain a target Level of Service at the transition between Level of Service C and D (maximum 35 seconds of control delay). If an existing facility, or study area intersection for purposes of this analysis, operates at an unacceptable Level of Service, then the existing control delay should be maintained. The lead agency may consult with the California Department of Transportation to determine the appropriate target Level of Service if the maximum 35 seconds of control delay is not feasible. NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS City of Anaheim For signalized study intersections within the City of Anaheim jurisdiction, a project traffic impact is considered to occur in accordance with the following table: Level of Service Final V/C Ratio Project-Related Increase in V/C C > 0.700 - 0.800 equal to or greater than 0.050 D > 0.800 - 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.030 E,F > 0.900 equal to or greater than 0.010 The City of Anaheim has not established operational impact thresholds for unsignalized intersections. As such, the Caltrans thresholds have been utilized for unsignalized intersections. A project traffic operational impact at an unsignalized intersection occurs if the addition of project-generated trips increases the delay by 10 seconds or more and/or causes Level of Service E or F. If a project is forecast to cause an operational traffic impact, feasible improvements that will reduce the impact shall be identified. Improvements can be in many forms, including the addition of lanes, traffic control 514 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 6 19-0202 modification, or demand management measures. If no feasible improvements can be identified for an impacted facility, the impact will remain unavoidable. Caltrans For Caltrans jurisdiction study intersections, a project traffic impact occurs if: The project causes or worsens unacceptable Level of Service at a freeway ramp. 615 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 7 19-0202 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM Figure 3 identifies the lane geometry and intersection traffic controls for Existing conditions based on a field survey of the study area. Regional access to the project area is provided by State Route 57 approximately 0.2 miles east of the project site. The key north-south roadway providing local circulation is Sunkist Street. The key east-west roadway providing local circulation is Ball Road. Sunkist Street is a 4-lane undivided to divided roadway. Sunkist Street is classified as a Secondary Arterial (90 foot right-of-way) in the City of Anaheim General Plan. On-street parking is prohibited immediately adjacent to the project on both sides of the street. Dedicated Class II (marked/on-street) bicycle lanes are provided on Sunkist Street north of the project site at Whidby Lane and south of Ball Road at Omega Avenue. Ball Road is a 4- to 6-lane divided roadway. Ball Road is classified as a Primary Arterial (106 foot right-of-way) in the City of Anaheim General Plan. On-street parking is prohibited immediately adjacent to the project on both sides of the street. Dedicated Class II (marked/on-street) bicycle lanes are planned for Ball Road. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Existing pedestrian facilities in the project vicinity are shown on Figure 4. As shown on Figure 4, pedestrian sidewalks are currently provided along the roadways adjacent to the project site. BICYCLE ROUTES Class II (marked/on-street) bicycle lanes are planned for the project frontage along Ball Road and are provided on Sunkist Street north of the project site at Whidby Lane and south of Ball Road at Omega Avenue. The City’s Master Plan proposes to construct bicycle lanes on Sunkist Street between Omega Avenue and Whidby Lane. The City of Anaheim Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities map is depicted on Figure 5. TRANSIT FACILITIES Figure 6 shows the existing transit routes available in the project vicinity. As shown on Figure 6, OCTA Transit Route 46 runs along Ball Road, with bus stops located within 1/4-mile walking distance from the project site at Ball Road. TRUCK ROUTES Figure 7 shows the designated truck routes as identified in the City of Anaheim General Plan. GENERAL PLAN CONTEXT Figure 8 shows the City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element roadway classifications map. This figure shows the nature and extent of arterial and collector highways that are needed to adequately serve the ultimate development depicted by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The City of Anaheim standard roadway cross-sections are illustrated on Figure 9. EXISTING (2018) TRAFFIC VOLUMES Figure 10 shows the Existing average daily traffic volumes. The Existing average daily traffic volumes have been obtained from the 2019 Annual Traffic Volume Map from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). 716 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 8 19-0202 Existing peak hour traffic conditions are based upon AM peak period and PM peak period intersection turning movement counts obtained in December 2019 during typical weekday conditions when schools were in session. The AM peak period was counted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and the PM peak period was counted between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The actual peak hour within the peak period is the four consecutive 15 minute periods with the highest total volume when all movements are added together. Thus, the weekday PM peak hour at one intersection may be 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM if those four consecutive 15 minute periods have the highest combined volume. Intersection turning movement count worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the Existing AM peak hour and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes. EXISTING ICU/DELAY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE The intersection Levels of Service for Existing conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 1. Existing intersection Level of Service worksheets are provided in Appendix D. As shown in Table 1, the study intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing conditions. 8 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.654 B 0.705 C 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.650 B 0.721 C HCM6 [15.5] B [16.6] C 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.605 B 0.710 C HCM6 [12.9] B [14.0] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) HCM = Highway Capacity Manual TS = Traffic Signal Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. LOS = Level of Service Notes: Caltrans = California Department of Transportation V/C = Volume/Capacity Table 1 Existing Intersection Levels of Service Traffic Control2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Study Intersection Jurisdiction 1 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-02029 F i g u r e 3 E x i s t i n g L a n e G e o m e t r y a n d I n t e r s e c t i o n T r a f f i c C o n t r o l s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 5 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 STOP ST O P ST O P F F F F R T O Traffic SignalStop Sign#-Lane Divided Roadway#-Lane Undivided Roadway E x i s t i n g L a n e R i g h t T u r n O v e r l a p F r e e R i g h t T u r n L a n e Legend#D#U RTOFSTOP 4 D 4 D 4 U 6D4D 6 D 6 D 6 D 6 D S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 0 F i g u r e 4 E x i s t i n g P e d e s t r i a n F a c i l i t i e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 Sidewalk LegendCross WalkBus StopB B B 1 1 F i g u r e 5 C i t y o f A n a h e i m E x i s t i n g a n d P l a n n e d B i c y c l e F a c i l i t i e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 NSource: City of Anaheim S i t e 1 2 F i g u r e 6 C i t y o f A n a h e i m T r a n s i t R o u t e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 NSource: City of Anaheim S i t e 1 3 F i g u r e 7 C i t y o f A n a h e i m T r u c k R o u t e M a p B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 NSource: City of Anaheim S i t e 1 4 F i g u r e 8 C i t y o f A n a h e i m G e n e r a l P l a n C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 NSource: City of Anaheim S i t e 1 5 F i g u r e 9 C i t y o f A n a h e i m G e n e r a l P l a n R o a d w a y C r o s s - S e c t i o n s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 1 0 6 ' t o 1 4 8 ' 53' to 74'Sce n i c E x p r e s s w a y : 4 t o 6 L a n e s D i v i d e d 5 3 ' t o 7 4 ' 1 2 0 ' t o 1 6 6 ' 60' to 83'Res o r t S m a r t s t r e e t : 6 t o 8 L a n e s D i v i d e d 6 0 ' t o 8 3 ' 1 3 0 ' t o 1 4 4 ' 65' to 72'Stadi u m S m a r t s t r e e t : 6 t o 8 L a n e s D i v i d e d 6 5 ' t o 7 2 ' 1 2 0 ' 60' M a j o r A r t e r i a l : 6 L a n e s D i v i d e d 6 0 ' 1 0 6 ' 53'Pr i m a r y A r t e r i a l : 4 t o 6 L a n e s D i v i d e d 5 3 ' 1 0 6 ' t o 1 1 8 ' 5 3 ' t o 5 9 ' H i l l s i d e P r i m a r y A r t e r i a l : 4 t o 6 L a n e s D i v i d e d 9 0 ' 4 5 ' S e c o n d a r y A r t e r i a l : 4 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 5 3 ' t o 5 9 ' 4 5 ' 6 6 ' t o 7 8 ' 3 3 ' t o 3 9 ' H i l l s i d e S e c o n d a r y A r t e r i a l : 4 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 3 3 ' t o 3 9 ' 6 4 ' 3 2 ' C o l l e c t o r S t r e e t : 2 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 3 2 ' 4 2 ' t o 5 4 ' 2 1 ' t o 2 7 ' H i l l s i d e C o l l e c t o r S t r e e t : 2 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 2 1 ' t o 2 7 ' 9 0 ' 4 5 ' C o m p l e t e S t r e e t s C o l l e c t o r : 2 L a n e s U n d i v i d e d 4 5 ' Source: City of Anaheim 1 6 F i g u r e 1 0 E x i s t i n g A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 0 1 4 . 0 41.0 5 2 . 0 3 7 . 0 2 4 7 . 9 2 4 9 . 9 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 1 7 F i g u r e 1 1 E x i s t i n g A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 534 1283 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 30174135 5325492021 5 3 1 1 8 7 4 7 3 9 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 7 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 8 5 1 1 6 0 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 8 5 1 1 6 0 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 485 828 1 0 9 1 7 5 6 7 7 6 1 4 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 314 494 1 1 6 2 4 5 0 5 9 6 3 0 7 1 8 F i g u r e 1 2 E x i s t i n g P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 1326 873 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 42459272 2734491512 4 9 1 1 3 4 4 2 2 9 6 1 4 5 9 6 1 8 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 6 7 1 2 3 8 7 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 6 7 1 2 3 8 7 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 407 820 1 2 1 3 4 5 0 1 5 8 0 2 3 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 613 299 1 1 1 1 5 0 9 1 2 0 9 4 3 0 1 9 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 20 19-0202 4. PROJECT TRIP FORECASTS This section describes how project trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment forecasts were developed. The forecast project volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Table 2 shows the project trip generation based on the Trip Generation Assessment for the Ball and Sunkist Gas Station and Car Wash (Fehr & Peers, July 31, 2019) and the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019). These sources combine trip generation forecasts based upon trip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017) and empirical data collected at three existing car wash locations within Orange County. As shown in Table 2, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 102 net new trips during the AM peak hour, 124 net new trips during the PM peak hour, and 1,507 net new daily trips. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Figure 13 and Figure 14 show the forecast outbound and inbound directional distribution patterns, respectively. Figure 15 and Figure 16 show the forecast outbound and inbound directional distribution patterns for pass-by trips, respectively. The project trip distribution patterns are based on review of existing volume data, surrounding land uses, designated truck routes, and the local and regional roadway facilities in the project vicinity. Based on the identified project trip generation and distributions, project average daily traffic volumes have been calculated and shown on Figure 17. AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes expected from the project are depicted on Figure 18 and Figure 19, respectively. 20 % In % Out Rate % In % Out Rate Commercial Retail ITE 820 TSF 62% 38% 0.94 48% 52% 3.81 37.75 Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market ITE 945 VFP 51% 49% 12.47 51% 49% 13.99 205.36 Automated Car Wash [a] Site [a] [a] [a] [a] [a] [a] [a] In Out Total In Out Total Existing Commercial Retail 20.200 TSF 12 7 19 37 40 77 763 - Pass-By Reduction (50% PM)4 -6 -4 -10 -19 -20 -39 -382 Subtotal - Existing 6 3 9 18 20 38 381 Proposed Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market 12 FP 77 73 150 86 82 168 2,465 - Pass-By Reduction (50%)3 -39 -36 -75 -43 -41 -84 -1,233 Automated Car Wash 1 Site 25 24 49 55 54 109 911 - Internal Capture (10%)4 -3 -2 -5 -6 -5 -11 -91 - Pass-By Reduction (20%)3 -4 -4 -8 -10 -10 -20 -164 Subtotal - Proposed 56 55 111 82 80 162 1,888 50 52 102 64 60 124 1,507 Notes: Table 2 Project Trip Generation Trip Generation Rates Land Use Source1 Units2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Rate Trips Generated 3) Pass-by reduction values from Los Angeles Department of Transportation Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, 2016. 4) 10% internal capture reduction assumed for compatible lane uses. Daily Net New Trips 1) Sources: ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017); ### = Land Use Code. [a] Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019). Data from three locations within Orange County. 2) TSF = Thousand Square Feet; VFP = Vehicle Fueling Positions Land Use Quantity Units 2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020221 F i g u r e 1 3 P r o j e c t O u t b o u n d T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 2 0 % 2 0 % 10%35% 5 0 % 3 0 % 8 0 % 3 5 % 2 5 % 5 % 2 0 % 1 0 % Percent From Project Legend10% 2 2 F i g u r e 1 4 P r o j e c t I n b o u n d T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 4 0 % 5 % 25% 3 0 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 2 0 % 2 0 % 6 0 % 2 0 % Percent To Project Legend10%10% 2 3 F i g u r e 1 5 P r o j e c t O u t b o u n d P a s s - B y T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 3 0 % 3 0 % 40% 4 5 % 2 5 % 7 0 % 2 0 % Percent From Project Legend10%10% 2 4 F i g u r e 1 6 P r o j e c t I n b o u n d P a s s - B y T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 3 0 % 20% 3 5 % 3 5 % 7 0 % Percent To Project Legend10% 5 % 5% 2 5 F i g u r e 1 7 P r o j e c t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 0 . 1 0 . 2 0.5 2 . 0 0 . 2 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 2 6 F i g u r e 1 8 P r o j e c t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 027 80 2 3 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 050 000 2 1 0 0 3 5 3 5 0 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 46 2 6 2 5 3 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 26 2 6 3 0 3 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 10 1 3 5 2 0 0 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 10 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 2 7 F i g u r e 1 9 P r o j e c t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 038 110 3 1 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 060 000 2 7 0 0 4 2 4 2 0 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 64 3 1 3 1 4 4 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 37 3 1 3 8 4 3 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 13 1 5 6 2 6 0 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 13 0 3 1 2 1 3 0 2 8 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 29 19-0202 5. FUTURE VOLUME FORECASTS This section describes how future volume forecasts for each analysis scenario were developed. Forecast study area volumes are illustrated on figures contained in this section. CUMULATIVE TRIPS Ambient Growth Rate To account for ambient growth on roadways, existing traffic volumes were increased by a growth rate of two percent (2.0%) per year over two years for Opening Year (2021) conditions. This equates to a total growth factor of 1.04 for Opening Year conditions. The ambient growth rate was conservatively applied to all movements at the study intersections. Other Development To account for trips generated by future development, trips generated by pending or approved other development projects in the City of Anaheim and City of Orange were reviewed in consultation with City of Anaheim Public Works Department staff and added to the study area as appropriate. Table 3 shows the trip generation summary for other development projects. Figure 20 shows the other development location map. There were no pending/approved projects in the City of Orange within the project vicinity that would contribute an appreciable number of trips to the study intersections. The ambient growth accounts for any additional trips generated by other development projects located outside the project vicinity and not specifically listed in this report. Figure 21 shows the forecast average daily traffic volumes for the other development. Figure 22 and Figure 23 show the forecast AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes for trips generated by other developments. ANALYSIS SCENARIO VOLUME FORECASTS Existing Plus Project Existing Plus Project volume forecasts were derived by adding the project generated trips to Existing volumes. Existing Plus Project average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 24. Existing Plus Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 25 and Figure 26. Existing Plus Cumulative Existing Plus Cumulative volume forecasts were derived by adding the other development generated trips to Existing volumes. Existing Plus Cumulative average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 27. Existing Plus Cumulative AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 28 and Figure 29. Opening Year Without Project To develop Opening Year Without Project volume forecasts, Existing volumes were combined with ambient growth and trips generated by other developments. Opening Year Without Project average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 30. Opening Year Without Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown Figure 31 and Figure 32. 29 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 30 19-0202 Opening Year With Project Opening Year With Project volume forecasts were developed by adding project generated trips to the Opening Year Without Project forecast. Opening Year With Project average daily traffic volumes are shown on Figure 33. Opening Year With Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 34 and Figure 35. 30 Pr o j e c t A d d r e s s In O u t T o t a l I n O u t T o t a l Fa s t - F o o d R e s t a u r a n t w / D r i v e - T h r u ( E x i s t i n g ) 1 . 8 5 6 T S F 2 8 1 9 4 7 2 6 2 6 5 2 6 4 3 Au t o m a t e d C a r W a s h ( P r o p o s e d ) 1 S i t e 2 8 2 1 4 9 5 2 5 6 1 0 8 1 , 9 3 6 0 2 2 2 6 3 0 5 6 1 , 2 9 3 No t e s : An a h e i m E x p r e s s C a r W a s h (D E V 2 1 0 1 7 - 0 0 0 9 9 ) 3 82 1 S S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d To t a l (3 ) S o u r c e : 8 2 1 S o u t h S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d T r i p G e n e r a t i o n A n a l y s i s , K u n z m a n A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . , M a r c h 1 8 , 2 0 1 8 . (1 ) T S F = T h o u s a n d S q u a r e F e e t (2 ) T r i p g e n e r a t i o n f r o m I n s t i t u t e o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n E n g i n e e r s , T r i p G e n e r a t i o n M a n u a l , 1 0 t h E d i t i o n , 2 0 1 7 , a n d G r e e n f o r e s t C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s , RK Engineering Group, Inc., Ju l y 3 1 , 2 0 1 9 . Ta b l e 3 Ot h e r D e v e l o p m e n t T r i p G e n e r a t i o n Tr i p s G e n e r a t e d 2 AM P e a k H o u r P M P e a k H o u r La n d U s e Qu a n t i t y U n i t s 1 Daily Pr o j e c t N a m e ( C a s e N u m b e r ) Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-0202 31 City of AnaheimCity of Anaheim Legend MA I N S T BALL RD Site WAGNER AVE N ST A T E C O L L E G E B L V D SU N K I S T S T E A S T S T SOUTH ST ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Figure 20 Other Development Locaon Map Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-0202 RI O V I S T A S T BA T A V I A S T #Other Development ID in: 57 32 F i g u r e 2 1 O t h e r D e v e l o p m e n t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 0.1 0 . 1 0 . 1 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 3 3 F i g u r e 2 2 O t h e r D e v e l o p m e n t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 0 0 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 000 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 F i g u r e 2 3 O t h e r D e v e l o p m e n t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 0 0 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 000 000 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 3 3 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 3 3 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 0 0 2 1 3 0 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 0 2 0 2 0 3 5 F i g u r e 2 4 E x i s t i n g P l u s P r o j e c t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 1 1 4 . 2 41.5 5 4 . 0 3 7 . 2 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 3 6 F i g u r e 2 5 E x i s t i n g P l u s P r o j e c t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 53427 81283 2 3 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 30179135 5325492021 7 4 1 1 8 7 4 7 4 2 5 1 0 3 7 2 0 7 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 46 1 8 7 7 1 6 2 7 3 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 26 1 8 7 7 1 6 3 2 3 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 485 838 1 1 0 4 7 6 1 7 9 6 1 4 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 324 494 1 1 6 5 4 6 0 6 0 6 3 0 7 3 7 F i g u r e 2 6 E x i s t i n g P l u s P r o j e c t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 132638 11873 3 1 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 42465272 2734491512 7 6 1 1 3 4 4 2 3 3 8 1 5 0 1 6 1 8 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 64 1 7 0 2 2 4 1 8 4 4 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 37 1 7 0 2 2 4 2 5 4 3 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 407 833 1 2 2 8 4 5 6 1 6 0 6 2 3 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 626 299 1 1 1 4 5 2 1 1 2 2 2 4 3 0 3 8 F i g u r e 2 7 E x i s t i n g P l u s C u m u l a t i v e A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 0 1 4 . 0 41.1 5 2 . 1 3 7 . 1 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 3 9 F i g u r e 2 8 E x i s t i n g P l u s C u m u l a t i v e A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 534 1283 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 30174135 5325492021 5 3 1 1 8 7 4 7 3 9 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 7 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 8 5 1 1 6 0 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 8 5 1 1 6 0 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 485 828 1 0 9 1 7 5 6 7 7 6 1 4 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 314 494 1 1 6 2 4 5 0 5 9 6 3 0 7 4 0 F i g u r e 2 9 E x i s t i n g P l u s C u m u l a t i v e P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 1326 873 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 42459272 2734491512 4 9 1 1 3 7 4 2 2 9 6 1 4 6 2 6 1 8 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 6 7 4 2 3 9 0 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 6 7 4 2 3 9 0 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 407 820 1 2 1 5 4 5 1 1 5 8 3 2 3 6 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 614 299 1 1 1 3 5 0 9 1 2 1 1 4 3 0 4 1 F i g u r e 3 0 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h o u t P r o j e c t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 3 1 4 . 6 42.8 5 4 . 2 3 8 . 6 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 4 2 F i g u r e 3 1 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h o u t P r o j e c t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 555 1334 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 31181140 5535712101 5 9 1 2 3 4 4 9 4 0 6 1 0 4 2 2 1 5 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 9 2 5 1 6 6 6 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 9 2 5 1 6 6 6 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 504 861 1 1 3 5 7 8 6 8 0 7 1 5 2 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 327 514 1 2 0 8 4 6 8 6 2 0 3 1 9 4 3 F i g u r e 3 2 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h o u t P r o j e c t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 1379 908 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 44477283 2844671572 5 9 1 1 8 2 4 4 3 0 8 1 5 2 0 6 4 3 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 7 4 1 2 4 8 5 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 1 7 4 1 2 4 8 5 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 423 853 1 2 6 4 4 6 9 1 6 4 6 2 4 5 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 639 311 1 1 5 7 5 2 9 1 2 5 9 4 4 7 4 4 F i g u r e 3 3 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h P r o j e c t A v e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 5 7 8 . 4 1 4 . 8 43.3 5 6 . 2 3 8 . 8 Vehicles Per Day (1,000's)Legend## 4 5 F i g u r e 3 4 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h P r o j e c t A M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 55527 81334 2 3 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 31186140 5535712101 8 0 1 2 3 4 4 9 4 4 1 1 0 7 7 2 1 5 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 46 1 9 5 1 1 6 9 1 3 2 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 26 1 9 5 1 1 6 9 6 3 2 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 504 871 1 1 4 8 7 9 1 8 2 7 1 5 2 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 337 514 1 2 1 1 4 7 8 6 3 0 3 1 9 4 6 F i g u r e 3 5 O p e n i n g Y e a r W i t h P r o j e c t P M P e a k H o u r I n t e r s e c t i o n T u r n i n g M o v e m e n t V o l u m e s B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 N S i t e SUNKIST STBALL RD 2 1 3 4 5 6 Study Intersection Legend#Project Driveway# 5 7 1 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / P r o j e c t D w y ( E W ) 137938 11908 3 1 2 S u n k i s t S t ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 44483283 2844671572 8 6 1 1 8 2 4 4 3 5 0 1 5 6 2 6 4 3 3 P r o j e c t W e s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 64 1 7 7 2 2 5 1 6 4 4 4 P r o j e c t E a s t D w y ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 37 1 7 7 2 2 5 2 3 4 3 5 S R - 5 7 S B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 423 866 1 2 7 9 4 7 5 1 6 7 2 2 4 5 6 S R - 5 7 N B R a m p s ( N S ) / B a l l R d ( E W ) 652 311 1 1 6 0 5 4 1 1 2 7 2 4 4 7 4 7 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 48 19-0202 6. FUTURE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Detailed intersection Level of Service calculation worksheets for each of the following analysis scenarios are provided in Appendix D. EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Intersection Levels of Service The intersection Levels of Service for Existing Plus Project conditions are shown in Table 4. As shown in Table 4, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour: Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although these intersections are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour, additional improvements are not recommended for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience any delay. These southbound right turning vehicles can queue within the project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right turning vehicles during the PM peak hour is 47.37 feet for the project west driveway and 23.17 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. Operational Impact Evaluation Table 5 evaluates the project impact at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions. As shown in Table 5, the proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for Existing Plus Project conditions. EXISTING PLUS CUMULATIVE Intersection Levels of Service The intersection Levels of Service for Existing Plus Cumulative conditions are shown in Table 6. As shown in Table 6, the study intersections are forecast to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Existing Plus Cumulative conditions. 48 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 49 19-0202 OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT Intersection Levels of Service The intersection Levels of Service for Opening Year Without Project conditions are shown in Table 7. As shown in Table 7, the study intersections are forecast to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year Without Project conditions. OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT Intersection Levels of Service The intersection Levels of Service for Opening Year With Project conditions are shown in Table 8. As shown in Table 8, the study intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service (D or better) during the peak hours for Opening Year With Project conditions, except for the following study area intersections that are forecast to operate at Level of Service E during the PM peak hour): Project West Driveway at Ball Road – #3 (PM peak hour – LOS F) Project East Driveway at Ball Road – #4 (PM peak hour – LOS E) Although these intersections are forecast to operate at Level of Service E/F during the PM peak hour, additional improvements are not recommended for these intersections. The level of service for a cross street stop controlled intersection is based on the average delay for the worst individual movement. Since these driveways are restricted to right turns in/out only with a raised median on Ball Road preventing inbound and outbound left turn movements, southbound right turn movements from the project site are the only turning movements that experience delay, since eastbound and westbound movements do not experience any delay. These southbound right turning vehicles can queue within the project site without contributing to adverse traffic operations on Ball Road. The 95th percentile queue length for these southbound right turning vehicles during the PM peak hour is 52.25 feet for the project west driveway and 25.34 feet for the project east driveway. Thus, stacking for three outbound vehicles is necessary at these driveways and the site plan provides for this. Furthermore, based on intersection geometrics and design, these two project driveways do not meet the all way stop or traffic signal warrant criteria as specified in the California Manual on Uniform Control Devices (2014 Update) by the California Department of Transportation. Operational Impact Evaluation Table 9 evaluates the project impact at the study intersections for Opening Year With Project conditions. As shown in Table 9, the proposed project is forecast to result in no operational traffic impacts at the study intersections for Opening Year With Project conditions. 49 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 1. Sunkist St at Project Dwy Anaheim CSS [10.2] B [15.0] B 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.666 B 0.723 C 3. Project West Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [20.6] C [45.7] E 4. Project East Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [19.5] C [36.9] E 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.656 B 0.730 C HCM6 [15.6] B [16.9] C 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.611 B 0.725 C HCM6 [12.9] B [14.3] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Caltrans = California Department of Transportation PM Peak Hour Table 4 Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service Jurisdiction1Study Intersection Traffic Control2 AM Peak Hour Notes: CSS = Cross Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal V/C = Volume/Capacity Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). LOS = Level of Service HCM = Highway Capacity Manual Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020250 ID Study Intersection V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd 0.654 B 0.666 B +0.012 No 0.705 C 0.723 C +0.018 No 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd 0.650 B 0.656 B +0.006 No 0.721 C 0.730 C +0.009 No 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd 0.605 B 0.611 B +0.006 No 0.710 C 0.725 C +0.015 No Notes: Signalized Intersections AM Peak Hour Table 5 Existing Plus Project Significant Impact Evaluation PM Peak Hour Without Project With Project Change Significant Impact? Without Project With Project (1) V/C = Volume/Capacity (2) LOS = Level of Service Change Significant Impact? Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020251 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.654 B 0.705 C 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.650 B 0.721 C HCM6 [15.5] B [16.6] B 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.605 B 0.711 C HCM6 [12.9] B [14.0] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Table 6 Existing Plus Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service PM Peak Hour Caltrans = California Department of Transportation Study Intersection Jurisdiction 1 Traffic Control2 AM Peak Hour Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). LOS = Level of Service HCM = Highway Capacity Manual Notes: CSS = Cross Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal V/C = Volume/Capacity Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020252 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.678 B 0.731 C 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.674 B 0.748 C HCM6 [16.0] B [17.5] B 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.628 B 0.737 C HCM6 [13.4] B [15.0] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Caltrans = California Department of Transportation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Notes: Table 7 Opening Year Without Project Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection Jurisdiction 1 Traffic Control2 CSS = Cross Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal V/C = Volume/Capacity Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). LOS = Level of Service HCM = Highway Capacity Manual Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020253 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 V/C3 or [Delay]4 LOS5 1. Sunkist St at Project Dwy Anaheim CSS [10.3] B [15.4] C 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd Anaheim TS 0.690 B 0.749 C 3. Project West Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [21.6] C [51.2] F 4. Project East Dwy at Ball Rd Anaheim CSS [20.3] C [40.3] E 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.680 B 0.757 C HCM6 [16.1] B [17.8] B 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd Caltrans TS 0.634 B 0.752 C HCM6 [13.4] B [15.8] B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Table 8 Opening Year With Project Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection Jurisdiction 1 Traffic Control2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour HCM = Highway Capacity Manual Notes: Caltrans = California Department of Transportation CSS = Cross Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal V/C = Volume/Capacity Delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control, LOS is based on overall average intersection delay. For intersections with cross street stop control, LOS is based on average delay of the worst individual lane (or movements sharing a lane). LOS = Level of Service Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020254 ID Study Intersection V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 V/C1 LOS2 2. Sunkist St at Ball Rd 0.678 B 0.690 B +0.012 No 0.731 C 0.749 C +0.018 No 5. SR-57 SB Ramps at Ball Rd 0.674 B 0.680 B +0.006 No 0.748 C 0.757 C +0.009 No 6. SR-57 NB Ramps at Ball Rd 0.628 B 0.634 B +0.006 No 0.737 C 0.752 C +0.015 No Notes: (1) V/C = Volume/Capacity Table 9 Opening Year With Project Significant Impact Evaluation Signalized Intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Without Project With Project Change Significant Impact? Without Project (2) LOS = Level of Service With Project Change Significant Impact? Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020255 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 56 19-0202 7. ON-SITE PARKING AND QUEUING ANALYSIS MUNICIPAL CODE OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS The City of Anaheim Municipal Code Table 42-A lists non-residential off-street parking requirements. Automotive-Service Stations (in conjunction with accessory retail/convenience store) require 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of the convenience store. Up to 50 percent of the pump islands may be counted as parking stalls. The convenience store is 2,945 square feet with six pump islands (12 vehicle fueling positions). The convenience store requires approximately 12 parking spaces with the six pump islands credited as three parking spaces. Thus, the convenience store component of the proposed project requires nine (9) marked parking spaces. Automotive-Washing requires a parking demand study per paragraph 18.42.040.010.0108. CAR WASH PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS The 387 North Tustin Street Drive-Through Queuing and Parking Study (Ganddini Group, Inc., June 11, 2019), contains empirical parking data for three existing car wash facilities. Field observations of parking demand were conducted at the following three existing car wash facility locations: 1. Rapids Express Carwash – 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange CA; 2. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash – 1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana, CA; and 3. Speedie Clean Express Car Wash – 2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana, CA. The number of parked vehicles were observed in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM during a typical weekday (Tuesday, July 10, 2018) and a typical Saturday (July 14, 2018). The observations were conducted using field surveys with technicians on-site. Table 10 and Table 11 exhibit the summaries of the parking demand observations for these three locations from the aforementioned parking study. As shown in Table 10, the Tuesday maximum peak parking demand observed was 20 parked vehicles at the Rapids Express site, 13 parked vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and 17 parked vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average parking demand for the Tuesday counts for the three survey sites is 14.3 parked vehicles throughout various times of the day. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile parking demand is 19.1 parked vehicles during the AM peak period. As shown in Table 11, the Saturday maximum peak parking demand observed was 18 parked vehicles at the Rapids Express site, 21 parked vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and 21 parked vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average parking demand for the Saturday counts for the three survey sites is 18.0 parked vehicles throughout various times during the mid-day peak period. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile parking demand is 20.4 parked vehicles during the AM peak period. The parking count data combined vehicles parked in vacuum station stalls and regular parking stalls. Field observations noted that some vehicles occupying the vacuum station stalls are not vacuuming but are either drying the vehicles or utilizing other amenities in the facility. Therefore, the overall parking demand includes all users of the car wash facility. Assuming the proposed car wash would experience parking demand similar to the three observed sites, the typical peak parking demand is estimated to be approximately 21 vehicles during peak periods based on the highest 85th-percentile parking demand for all users of the car wash facility. 56 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 57 19-0202 PARKING DEMAND AND REQUIREMENTS The gasoline/service station with convenience market component of the proposed project requires nine (9) parking spaces based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code off-street parking requirements. The project proposes to provide nine (9) parking spaces. Thus, sufficient off-street parking is provided for the gasoline/service station with convenience market component of the proposed project. The car wash component of the proposed project requires 21 parking spaces to meet maximum demand observed at three similar car wash facilities. The proposed development provides 24 parking spaces. Thus, sufficient off-street parking is provided for the car wash component of the proposed project. QUEUING ANALYSIS This analysis estimates the drive through car wash lane queuing demand and parking demand for the proposed project based on observations at six existing similar car wash facilities. The City of Anaheim provided data from the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, July 31, 2019). The three existing car wash facilities surveyed in the Greenforest Car Wash study are located at: 1. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash – 1807 Main Street, Santa Ana, CA; 2. Zaroo Express Car Wash – 1205 West 17th Street, Santa Ana, CA; and 3. Santa Ana Express Car Wash – 202 East First Street, Santa Ana, CA. The Greenforest Car Wash study compiled queuing surveys during the peak traffic generating hour on one weekday and one Saturday at the above locations. The 95th-percentile queue was calculated for each site and represents the maximum amount of vehicles stacked behind the car wash tunnel 95 percent of the time or less. The average vehicle length, including headway, was considered 20 feet for queuing purposes. The 387 North Tustin Street Drive-Through Queuing and Parking Study (Ganddini Group, Inc., June 11, 2019), contains empirical queuing data for three existing car wash facilities. Field observations of drive through car wash lane queues were conducted at the following three existing car wash facility locations: 4. Rapids Express Carwash – 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange CA; 5. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash – 1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana, CA; and 6. Speedie Clean Express Car Wash – 2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana, CA. The drive-through vehicular queues were observed in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM during a typical weekday (Tuesday, July 10, 2018) and a typical Saturday (July 14, 2018). The observations were conducted using field surveys with technicians on-site. The 85th-percentile queue was calculated for each site and represents the maximum amount of vehicles stacked behind the car wash tunnel 85 percent of the time or less. Table 10 and Table 11 exhibit the summaries of the queuing length observations for these three locations from the aforementioned parking study. Table 12 shows the results of the queuing analysis for all six locations. As shown on Table 12, the average peak hour 95th/85th percentile queue is four (4) vehicles on a weekday and nine (9) vehicles on a Saturday. A queue of nine (9) vehicles would require 180 feet (9 vehicles x 20 feet per vehicle) of queue length. The site plan shows stacking distance for 33 vehicles spaced 20 feet apart from the car wash tunnel through the loading area between the car wash and northern property boundary, ending at the beginning of the drive-thru lane. Therefore, adequate queuing capacity is anticipated to be provided for the project site. Appendix E includes supporting data provided by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department from the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, July 31, 2019) and the 387 North Tustin Street Drive-Through Queuing and Parking Study (Ganddini Group, Inc., June 11, 2019). 57 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 58 19-0202 VACUUM PARKING STALLS The vacuum parking stalls for the car wash are located on the south side of the car wash tunnel. A 28.58 foot east-west drive aisle extends from the convenience market to the drive-thru lane for the car wash between the vacuum stalls and the south property boundary on Ball Road. The vacuum parking stalls are situated perpendicular to this drive aisle. Since the average peak hour 95th/85th percentile queue is nine (9) vehicles on a Saturday and the car wash provides queuing for 33 vehicles from the car wash tunnel to the beginning of the drive-thru, queuing beyond the drive-thru entrance along the southern property boundary adjacent to Ball Road is not expected to occur. Therefore, the position of the vacuum parking stalls perpendicular to this drive aisle and the car wash tunnel appears to be sufficient, and redesign (such as angled parking of these vacuum parking stalls) does not appear to be necessary. 58 Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 230112 2 31.02.01.72.7 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 332128 3 82.34.02.76.5 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 051345 4 51.74.33.15.0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 032325 2 51.33.72.04.4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 141723 2 71.34.71.76.1 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 090537 3 91.07.02.18.4 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 1506411 4111.77.33.19.5 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 1 13 0 2 5 11 5 13 2.0 8.7 3.8 12.4 9:00 AM - 9:15 AM 3 12 1 4 8 10 8 12 4.0 8.7 6.5 11.4 9:15 AM - 9:30 AM 2 20 0 6 4 17 4 20 *2.0 14.3 *3.4 19.1 * 9:30 AM - 9:45 AM 0 11 1 3 4 11 4 11 1.7 8.3 3.1 11.0 9:45 AM - 10:00 AM 1 15 1539 3151.79.72.413.2 10:00 AM - 10:15 AM 0 19 0 4 4 11 4 19 1.3 11.3 2.8 16.6 10:15 AM - 10:30 AM 0 14 0 1 7 13 7 14 2.3 9.3 4.9 13.7 10:30 AM - 10:45 AM 1 15 1 5 5 14 5 15 2.3 11.3 3.8 14.7 10:45 AM - 11:00 AM 1 12 1998 9123.79.76.611.1 11:00 AM - 11:15 AM 1 11 0959 5112.09.73.810.4 11:15 AM - 11:30 AM 2 12 2877 7123.79.05.510.8 11:30 AM - 11:45 AM 0 14 1 4 5 13 5 14 2.0 10.3 3.8 13.7 11:45 AM - 12:00 PM 1 14 2 5 6 12 6 14 3.0 10.3 4.8 13.4 12:00 PM - 12:15 PM 1 11 1 7 8 14 8 14 3.3 10.7 5.9 13.1 12:15 PM - 12:30 PM 0 12 3 8 4 13 4 13 2.3 11.0 3.7 12.7 12:30 PM - 12:45 PM 2 10 0 8 4 13 4 13 2.0 10.3 3.4 12.1 12:45 PM - 1:00 PM 0 11 1878 7112.79.05.210.1 1:00 PM - 1:15 PM 2 10 3948 4103.09.03.79.7 1:15 PM - 1:30 PM 1 12 0 9 5 11 5 12 2.0 10.7 3.8 11.7 1:30 PM - 1:45 PM 5 14 1 8 1 15 5 15 2.3 12.3 3.8 14.7 1:45 PM - 2:00 PM 4 14 0 7 6 12 6 14 3.3 11.0 5.4 13.4 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM 6 17 1 7 1 13 6 17 2.7 12.3 4.5 15.8 2:15 PM - 2:30 PM 3 15 1 8 4 12 4 15 2.7 11.7 3.7 14.1 2:30 PM - 2:45 PM 5 16 0 10 1 17 5 17 2.0 14.3 *3.8 16.7 2:45 PM - 3:00 PM 7 12 0 11 1 14 7 14 2.7 12.3 5.2 13.4 3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 3 16 0926 3161.710.3 2.7 13.9 3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 4 15 1 8 3 14 4 15 2.7 12.3 3.7 14.7 3:30 PM - 3:45 PM 2 19 1 7 1 17 2 19 1.3 14.3 *1.7 18.4 3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 2 15 0 7 5 13 5 15 2.3 11.7 4.1 14.4 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 3 15 0177 7153.37.75.812.6 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 6 12 2 4 4 13 6 13 4.0 9.7 5.4 12.7 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 5 13 1 4 1 11 5 13 2.3 9.3 3.8 12.4 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 4 14 0 5 3 13 4 14 2.3 10.7 3.7 13.7 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 6903310 6103.07.35.19.7 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 3 16 2428 3162.39.32.713.6 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 6 14 0748 6143.39.75.412.2 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 3 15 3718 3152.310.0 3.0 12.9 6:00 PM - 6:15 PM 5 17 0 13 2 13 5 17 2.3 14.3 *4.1 15.8 6:15 PM - 6:30 PM 4909012 4121.310.0 2.8 11.1 6:30 PM - 6:45 PM 5 11 1959 5113.79.75.010.4 6:45 PM - 7:00 PM 3 14 1 11 2 13 3 14 2.0 12.7 2.7 13.7 7:00 PM - 7:15 PM 1 17 0 11 0 8 1 17 0.3 12.0 0.7 15.2 7:15 PM - 7:30 PM 4 12 0 12 1 9 4 12 1.7 11.0 3.1 12.0 7:30 PM - 7:45 PM 1 14 0 12 1 12 1 14 0.7 12.7 1.0 13.4 7:45 PM - 8:00 PM 18 4 1 11 2 9 18 *11 7.0 *8.0 13.2 *10.4 18 20 3 13 9 17 2.8 12.3 0.8 6.6 3.6 10.6 5.0 16.0 2.0 9.4 6.0 13.4 Site Average Site 85th Percentile Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking Site Peak Table 10 Weekday Vehicle Queue and Parking Demand Survey (July 10, 2018) Time Period Rapids Express Scrub Bot Express Speedie Clean Express Hourly Peak Hourly Average Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020259 Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 270635 3 71.76.02.76.7 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 5 11 1 10 2 13 5 13 2.7 11.3 4.1 12.4 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 3 12 0 12 3 11 3 12 2.0 11.7 3.0 12.0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 2 11 0 10 1 12 2 12 1.0 11.0 1.7 11.7 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 5 15 2 8 0 10 5 15 2.3 11.0 4.1 13.5 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 4 14 0 10 2 14 4 14 2.0 12.7 3.4 14.0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 6 15 0 10 6 15 6 15 4.0 13.3 6.0 15.0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 3 17 0 6 2 18 3 18 1.7 13.7 2.7 17.7 9:00 AM - 9:15 AM 6 18 1 10 1 13 6 18 2.7 13.7 4.5 16.5 9:15 AM - 9:30 AM 4 16 1 11 3 14 4 16 2.7 13.7 3.7 15.4 9:30 AM - 9:45 AM 4 17 1 10 0 14 4 17 1.7 13.7 3.1 16.1 9:45 AM - 10:00 AM 6 16 3 14 4 15 6 16 4.3 15.0 5.4 15.7 10:00 AM - 10:15 AM 5 14 3 21 3 19 5 21 *3.7 18.0 *4.4 20.4 * 10:15 AM - 10:30 AM 4 16 0 11 1 16 4 16 1.7 14.3 3.1 16.0 10:30 AM - 10:45 AM 5 18 1 12 4 19 5 19 3.3 16.3 4.7 18.7 10:45 AM - 11:00 AM 9 17 2 15 2 15 9 17 4.3 15.7 6.9 16.4 11:00 AM - 11:15 AM 9 18 4 15 4 16 9 18 5.7 16.3 7.5 17.4 11:15 AM - 11:30 AM 9 14 3 15 4 17 9 17 5.3 15.3 7.5 16.4 11:30 AM - 11:45 AM 11 15 5 18 7 21 11 21 *7.7 18.0 *9.8 20.1 11:45 AM - 12:00 PM 9 16 3 19 6 14 9 19 6.0 16.3 8.1 18.1 12:00 PM - 12:15 PM 14 17 1 20 4 15 14 20 6.3 17.3 11.0 19.1 12:15 PM - 12:30 PM 10 15 0 18 5 15 10 18 5.0 16.0 8.5 17.1 12:30 PM - 12:45 PM 6 16 1 9 6 21 6 21 *4.3 15.3 6.0 19.5 12:45 PM - 1:00 PM 15 15 2 12 5 18 15 18 7.3 15.0 12.0 17.1 1:00 PM - 1:15 PM 14 18 5 13 6 19 14 19 8.3 16.7 11.6 18.7 1:15 PM - 1:30 PM 14 18 4 15 7 20 14 20 8.3 17.7 11.9 19.4 1:30 PM - 1:45 PM 22 4 3 16 8 21 22 *21 *11.0 *13.7 17.8 *19.5 1:45 PM - 2:00 PM 21 4 0 15 4 16 21 16 8.3 11.7 15.9 15.7 2:00 PM - 2:15 PM 19 7 2 13 0 20 19 20 7.0 13.3 13.9 17.9 2:15 PM - 2:30 PM 14 3 0 15 2 15 14 15 5.3 11.0 10.4 15.0 2:30 PM - 2:45 PM 17 5 0 14 4 13 17 14 7.0 10.7 13.1 13.7 2:45 PM - 3:00 PM 18 4 2 12 1 15 18 15 7.0 10.3 13.2 14.1 3:00 PM - 3:15 PM 18 2 1 14 5 21 18 21 *8.0 12.3 14.1 18.9 3:15 PM - 3:30 PM 20 5 0 13 3 19 20 19 7.7 12.3 14.9 17.2 3:30 PM - 3:45 PM 17 3 0 13 3 16 17 16 6.7 10.7 12.8 15.1 3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 22 6 3 12 7 17 22 *17 10.7 11.7 17.5 15.5 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 19 2 2 12 0 14 19 14 7.0 9.3 13.9 13.4 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 17 0 4 13 5 20 17 20 8.7 11.0 13.4 17.9 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 18 1 1 16 3 15 18 16 7.3 10.7 13.5 15.7 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 16 3 1 16 5 9 16 16 7.3 9.3 12.7 13.9 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 13 2 2 12 2 11 13 12 5.7 8.3 9.7 11.7 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 13 1 1 15 1 11 13 15 5.0 9.0 9.4 13.8 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 12 0 0 13 1 15 12 15 4.3 9.3 8.7 14.4 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 12 2 2 14 5 16 12 16 6.3 10.7 9.9 15.4 6:00 PM - 6:15 PM 10 0 3 13 3 19 10 19 5.3 10.7 7.9 17.2 6:15 PM - 6:30 PM 9 0 2 14 3 17 9 17 4.7 10.3 7.2 16.1 6:30 PM - 6:45 PM 9 0 3 13 2 11 9 13 4.7 8.0 7.2 12.4 6:45 PM - 7:00 PM 8 0 0 10 1 9 8 10 3.0 6.3 5.9 9.7 7:00 PM - 7:15 PM 7 0 0 12 1 7 7 12 2.7 6.3 5.2 10.5 7:15 PM - 7:30 PM 8008210 8103.36.06.29.4 7:30 PM - 7:45 PM 6018411 6113.76.35.410.1 7:45 PM - 8:00 PM 6 0 0 13 2 12 6 13 2.7 8.3 4.8 12.7 22 18 5 21 8 21 10.7 8.7 1.5 12.9 3.2 15.0 18.0 17.0 3.0 15.4 5.4 19.0 Table 11 Saturday Vehicle Queue and Parking Demand Survey (July 14, 2018) Time Period Rapids Express Scrub Bot Express Speedie Clean Express Hourly Peak Hourly Average Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking Site Peak Site Average Site 85th Percentile Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020260 Peak Hour Queue (85th/95th Percentile, in Vehicles) 4 Peak Hour Queue (85th/95th Percentile, in Vehicles) 9 Notes: Table 12 Drive Through Car Wash Lane Queuing Analysis Scrub Bot Express Car Wash1 (1807 Main Street, Santa Ana)3 Observed Car Wash Location Weekday 2(1205 West 17th Street, Santa Ana) Santa Ana Express Car Wash1 5(202 East First Street, Santa Ana) Zaroo Express Car Wash1 Rapids Express Car Wash2 5(2045 North Tustin Street, Orange) Scrub Bot Express Car Wash2 2(1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana) Speedie Clean Express Car Wash2 6(2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana) Average Peak Queue (1) Source: Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis, RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash2 3(1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana) Speedie Clean Express Car Wash2 6(2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana) Average Peak Queue (2) Source: 387 North Tustin Street Drive-Through Queuing and Parking Study, Ganddini Group, Inc., June 11, 2019. Peak hour queue is 85th percentile. Saturday Observed Car Wash Location Scrub Bot Express Car Wash1 5(1807 Main Street, Santa Ana) Zaroo Express Car Wash1 6(1205 West 17th Street, Santa Ana) Santa Ana Express Car Wash1 14(202 East First Street, Santa Ana) Rapids Express Car Wash2 18(2045 North Tustin Street, Orange) Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19-020261 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 62 19-0202 8. VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) BACKGROUND The California Natural Resources Agency adopted revised CEQA Guidelines on December 28, 2018. Among the changes to the guidelines was the removal of vehicle delay and Level of Service (LOS) from consideration for transportation impacts under CEQA. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts were to be evaluated based on a project’s effect on vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Lead agencies were allowed to continue using their current impact criteria until June 30, 2020, or to opt into the revised transportation guidelines. In late 2019, State courts stated that under section 21099, subdivision (b)(2), existing law is that “automobile delay, as described solely by level of service or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment” under CEQA, except for roadway capacity projects. While the Proposed Project does not create a significant impact through LOS or delay, for the purposes of this recent court decision, the Proposed Project was also screened for VMT analysis. On June 23, 2020, the City of Anaheim City Council adopted the VMT Thresholds of Significance for purpose of analyzing transportation impacts and also approved the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Analysis. Based on the City Guidelines, the proposed project type is one of the screening thresholds that could be used for determining if a VMT analysis is required. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of access to services by local residents and has the effect of reducing vehicle miles traveled. Specifically in the City’s guidelines, the following uses are presumed to have a less than significant impact due to their local serving nature: Local serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet, including: o Automobile Washing o Automotive- Service Stations o Convenience Stores VMT ASSESSMENT AND SCREENING The Proposed Project consists solely of these uses. Also, there is the propensity for patrons to use more than one of these facilities on the same trip, also referred to as internal capture. Therefore, the Project could be screened from a VMT analysis, and would be considered a less than significant impact on VMT, per the City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis. Please note that the City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis does not preclude the requirements for a LOS analysis, as required by the City’s General Plan. The VMT analysis is used to determine if there is a significant impact under CEQA. However, the LOS analysis is also required to determine if the project conforms with the requirements of the Anaheim General Plan. 62 Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 63 19-0202 9. CONCLUSIONS MITIGATION MEASURES No off-site mitigation measure improvements were identified since the proposed project is forecast to result in no significant traffic impacts at the study intersections for the scenarios analyzed. ON-SITE PARKING AND QUEUING Sufficient off-street parking is provided for both the gasoline station/convenience market and the car wash components of the proposed project. Adequate drive through car wash lane queuing capacity is anticipated to be provided for the project site. The position of the vacuum parking stalls perpendicular to the east-west drive aisle and the car wash tunnel appears to be sufficient, and redesign (such as angled parking of these vacuum parking stalls) does not appear to be necessary. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS All roadway design, traffic signing and striping, and traffic control improvements relating to the proposed project should be constructed in accordance with applicable engineering standards and to the satisfaction of the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. Site-adjacent roadways should be repaired at their ultimate half-section width, including landscaping and parkway improvements in conjunction with development, or as otherwise required by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. On-site traffic signing and striping plans should be submitted for City of Anaheim approval in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. The final grading, landscaping, and street improvement plans should demonstrate that sight distance standards are met in accordance with applicable City of Anaheim/California Department of Transportation sight distance standards. As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Anaheim should periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory. 63 Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19‐0202 APPENDICES Appendix A Glossary Appendix B Scoping Agreement Appendix C Volume Count Worksheets Appendix D Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E Parking and Queuing Data Apx - 1 APPENDIX A GLOSSARY Apx - 2 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ACRONYMS AC Acres ADT Average Daily Traffic Caltrans California Department of Transportation DU Dwelling Unit ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS Level of Service TSF Thousand Square Feet V/C Volume/Capacity VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The average 24‐hour volume for a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. For example, Annual Average Daily Traffic is the total volume during a year divided by 365 days. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A point of constriction along a roadway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CONTROL DELAY: The component of delay, typically expressed in seconds per vehicle, resulting from the type of traffic control at an intersection. Control delay is measured by comparison with the uncontrolled condition; it includes delay incurred by slowing down, stopping/waiting, and speeding up. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). CORNER SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum sight distance required by the driver of a vehicle to cross or enter the lanes of the major roadway without requiring approaching traffic travelling at a given speed to radically alter their speed or trajectory. Corner sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the pavement to an object height of 36 inches above the pavement in the center of the nearest approach lane. CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for a traffic signal to complete one full cycle of indications. CUL‐DE‐SAC: A local street open at one end only and with special provisions for turning around. Apx - 3 DAILY CAPACITY: A theoretical value representing the daily traffic volume that will typically result in a peak hour volume equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic‐actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI‐MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. Apx - 4 PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENT (PCE): A metric used to assess the impact of larger vehicles, such as trucks, recreational vehicles, and buses, by converting the traffic volume of larger vehicles to an equivalent number of passenger cars. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles. PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. QUEUE: The number of vehicles waiting at a service area such as a traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate. QUEUE LENGTH: The length of vehicle queue, typically expressed in feet, waiting at a service area such as a traffic signal, stop sign, or access gate. SCREEN‐LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SHARED/RECIPROCAL PARKING AGREEMENT: A written binding document executed between property owners to provide a designated number of off‐street parking stalls within a designated area to be available for specified businesses or land uses. SIGHT DISTANCE: The continuous length of roadway visible to a driver or roadway user. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STACKING DISTANCE: The length of area available behind a service area, such as a traffic signal or gate, for vehicle queueing to occur. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through an intersection. STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE: The minimum distance required by the driver of a vehicle on the major roadway travelling at a given speed to bring the vehicle to a stop after an object on the road becomes visible. Stopping sight distance is measured from the driver’s eye at 42 inches above the pavement to an object height of 6 inches above the pavement. TRAFFIC‐ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP‐END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination (i.e., each trip has two trip‐ends). A trip‐end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. Apx - 5 TURNING RADIUS: The circular arc formed by the smallest turning path radius of the front outside tire of a vehicle, such as that performed by a U‐turn maneuver. This is based on the length and width of the wheel base as well as the steering mechanism of the vehicle. UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles. Apx - 6 APPENDIX B SCOPING AGREEMENT Apx - 7 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714) 795‐3100 | www.ganddini.com MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TO: David Kennedy | CITY OF ANAHEIM FROM: Bryan Crawford | GANDDINI GROUP, INC. Giancarlo Ganddini | GANDDINI GROUP, INC. DATE: December 13, 2019 SUBJECT: Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope 19‐0202 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this scoping document is to outline the proposed traffic analysis parameters and assumptions for the Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash project for review/concurrence by City of Anaheim staff. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1 shows the project location map. The project site is located at the northeast corner of Sunkist Street and Ball Road in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project involves demolishing the existing 20,200 square feet of commercial retail and replacing it with a 12 fueling position gasoline/service station with convenience market and an automated car wash. The site plan is illustrated on Figure 2. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION Table 1 shows the project trip generation based on the Trip Generation Assessment for the Ball and Sunkist Gas Station and Car Wash, prepared by Fehr & Peers, July 31, 2019 and the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019. Trip generation is shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 102 additional trips during the morning peak hour, 124 additional trips during the evening peak hour, and 1,507 additional daily trips. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the forecast directional distribution patterns of project‐generated trips for outbound and inbound vehicles. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the forecast directional distribution patterns of pass‐by trips for outbound and inbound vehicles. STUDY AREA The study area is proposed to consist of the following six (6) study intersections: Apx - 8 David Kennedy | CITY OF ANAHEIM Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope December 13, 2019 Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope 2 19‐0202 Study Intersections 1. Sunkist Street (NS) at Project Driveway (EW) 2. Sunkist Street (NS) at Ball Road (EW) 3. Project West Driveway (NS) at Ball Road (EW) 4. Project East Driveway (NS) at Ball Road (EW) 5. SR‐57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Road (EW) 6. SR‐57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Road (EW) ANALYSIS SCENARIOS The traffic study shall evaluate the following analysis scenarios for typical weekday morning and evening peak hour conditions: Existing Existing Plus Project Existing Plus Cumulative Opening Year Without Project Opening Year With Project TRAFFIC COUNTS New intersection turning movement counts will collected at the study intersections during the morning peak period (7:00 AM – 9:00 AM) and evening peak period (4:00 PM – 6:00 PM) on a typical weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) while local schools are in session. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The signalized study intersections shall by analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology in accordance with the parameters and impact thresholds prescribed in the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Studies Criteria. The unsignalized study intersections shall be analyzed using the intersection delay methodology and recommended default factors prescribed in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition). Intersections within the jurisdiction of Caltrans will be analyzed utilizing both the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology and the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition). Performance Standards The City of Anaheim has established Level of Service D as the minimum acceptable Level of Service during peak hour conditions. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) endeavors to maintain a target Level of Service at the transition between Level of Service C and D (maximum 35 seconds of control delay). If an existing facility, or study area intersection for purposes of this analysis, operates at an unacceptable Level of Service, then the Apx - 9 David Kennedy | CITY OF ANAHEIM Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope December 13, 2019 Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven & Car Wash Traffic Study Scope 3 19‐0202 existing control delay should be maintained. The lead agency may consult with the California Department of Transportation to determine the appropriate target Level of Service if the maximum 35 seconds of control delay is not feasible. Thresholds of Significance For signalized study intersections, a project traffic impact is considered significant if: The addition of project generated trips is forecast to cause an increase in volume‐to‐capacity of 0.050 or greater when the intersection is operating at Level of Service C. The addition of project generated trips is forecast to cause an increase in volume‐to‐capacity of 0.030 or greater when the intersection is operating at Level of Service D. The addition of project generated trips is forecast to cause an increase in volume‐to‐capacity of 0.010 or greater when the intersection is operating at Level of Service E or F. For unsignalized study intersections, a project traffic impact is considered significant if: The addition of project‐generated trips is forecast to cause or worsen Level of Service E or F and a traffic signal is warranted based on the peak hour volume criteria established in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2014 Edition). The addition of project‐generated trips is forecast to increase the delay at intersections already at Level of Service E or F by 10 seconds or more. For Caltrans jurisdiction study intersections, a project traffic impact is considered significant if: The project causes or worsens unacceptable Level of Service at a freeway ramp. CAR WASH OFF‐STREET PARKING & QUEUEING ANALYSIS The number of off‐street parking spaces required for the car wash shall be evaluated based on the City of Anaheim Municipal Code and parking count data collected on one typical weekday and one typical Saturday at the three locations analyzed in the queuing and parking study for the existing Rapid Express Car Wash located at 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange, CA. A queuing analysis for the car wash shall also be evaluated based on data collected on one typical weekday and one typical Saturday at the three locations analyzed in the queuing and parking study for the existing Rapid Express Car Wash located at 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange, CA and the Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019. This provides for data at six total locations. CONCLUSION We appreciate the opportunity to provide this scoping document for your review. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the proposed scope, please contact me at (714) 795‐3100 x 106. Apx - 10 % In % Out Rate % In % Out Rate Commercial Retail ITE 820 TSF 62% 38% 0.94 48% 52% 3.81 37.75 Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market ITE 945 FP 51% 49% 12.47 51% 49% 13.99 205.36 Automated Car Wash ITE 948 TSF [3] [3] [3] [3] [3] [3] [3] In Out Total In Out Total Existing Commercial Retail 20.200 TSF 12 7 19 37 40 77 763 ‐ Pass‐By Reduction (50% PM)4 ‐6 ‐4 ‐10 ‐19 ‐20 ‐39 ‐382 Total 6 3 9 18 20 38 381 Proposed Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market 12 FP 77 73 150 86 82 168 2,465 ‐ Pass‐By Reduction (50%)4 ‐39 ‐36 ‐75 ‐43 ‐41 ‐84 ‐1,233 Automated Car Wash 1 Site 25 24 49 55 54 109 911 ‐ Internal Capture (10%)5 ‐3 ‐2 ‐5 ‐6 ‐5 ‐11 ‐91 ‐ Pass‐By Reduction (20%)4 ‐4 ‐4 ‐8 ‐10 ‐10 ‐20 ‐164 Total 56 55 111 82 80 162 1,888 50 52 102 64 60 124 1,507 Notes: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Rate Trips Generated Land Use Quantity 1) ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017; XXX= Land Use Code 2) TSF = Thousand Square Feet; FP = Fueling Positions Difference 4) Pass‐by reduction values from Los Angeles Department of Transportation Traffic Impact Study Guidelines , 2016. 5) 10% internal capture reduction assumed for compatible lane uses. 3) Source: Greenforest Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis , RK Engineering Group, Inc., July 31, 2019. Data from three locations within Orange County. Table 1 Project Trip Generation Trip Generation Rates Land Use Source1 Units2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Units2 Ball‐Sunkist 7‐Eleven Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis 19‐0202Apx - 11 A p x - 1 2 A p x - 1 3 F i g u r e 3 P r o j e c t O u t b o u n d T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 . S i t e S81K,ST STBALL RD 2 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 ..UFHQW )URP 3URMHFW /HJHQG A p x - 1 4 F i g u r e 4 P r o j e c t I n b o u n d T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 1 S i t e S81K,ST STBALL RD 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 3HUFHQW 7R 3URMHFW /HJHQG10 A p x - 1 5 A p x - 1 6 F i g u r e 6 P r o j e c t I n b o u n d P a s s - B y T r i p D i s t r i b u t i o n B a l l - S u n k i s t 7 - E l e v e n & C a r W a s h T r a f f i c I m p a c t A n a l y s i s 1 9 - 0 2 0 2 1 S i t e S81K,ST STBALL RD 0 20 0 3HUFHQW 7R 3URMHFW /HJHQG A p x - 1 7 Bryan Crawford <bryandavidcrawford@gmail.com> RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement PHVVDJHV Giancarlo Ganddini JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP!7XH 'HF DW 30 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! David, A.ached is the proposed scoping agreement previously sent to you by Bryan Crawford from our oĸce. Let us know if you have any quesƟons or comments. Thanks, Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP Principal GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP From: David Kennedy [mailto:'.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 1:34 PM To: ilan Golcheh <LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP> Cc: Giancarlo Ganddini <JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP> Subject: RE: Tra ĸc Scoping Agreement Hi, Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 1 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 18 I am out of the oĸce most of the day. I just got in, but will be in meeƟngs the next few hours. Giancarlo, could you please contact me by email? David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 From: ilan Golcheh <LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 11:23 AM To: David Kennedy <'.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW> Cc: Giancarlo Ganddini <JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP> Subject: Re: Tra ĸc Scoping Agreement 'DYLG +RSH DOO LV ZHOO , MXVW ZDQWHG WR IROORZ XS RQFH DJDLQ VLQFH RXU SURMHFW LV YHU\ WLPH VHQVLWLYH :RXOG \RX SOHDVH JLYH *LDQFDUOR D FDOO WR GLVFXVV WKLV VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW" 7KDQN \RX YHU\ PXFK 'DYLG +LV QXPEHU LV EHORZ Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP Principal GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP 2Q 'HF DW 30 LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! ZURWH Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 2 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 19 'DYLG +RSH DOO LV ZHOO :RXOG \RX SOHDVH IROORZ XS ZLWK *LDQFDUOR LQ UHJDUGV WR WKH WUDIILF VWXG\ VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW" :H ZRXOG UHDOO\ OLNH WR PRYH IRUZDUG DQG VXEPLW DVDS WR WKH FLW\ WR JHW WR RXU KHDULQJ 7KDQN \RX YHU\ PXFK 6LQFHUHO\ ,ODQ *ROFKHK President Golcheh Group $IILOLDWHG ZLWK 3URJUHVVLYH 5HDO (VWDWH '5( /LFHQVH 1XPEHU 6 %HYHUO\ 'U /RV $QJHOHV &$ 6XLWH ,ODQ#*ROFKHK*URXSFRP &HOO 6FUHHQ 6KRW DW 30SQJ! 6LQFHUHO\ ,ODQ *ROFKHK President Golcheh Group $IILOLDWHG ZLWK 3URJUHVVLYH 5HDO (VWDWH '5( /LFHQVH 1XPEHU 6 %HYHUO\ 'U /RV $QJHOHV &$ 6XLWH ,ODQ#*ROFKHK*URXSFRP &HOO 19-0202-Scope.pdf . Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 3 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 20 David Kennedy '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW!7XH 'HF DW 30 7R *LDQFDUOR *DQGGLQL JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! Hi Giancarlo, A couple of comments: Please add ExisƟng plus CumulaƟve scenario. This is in our traĸc impact study guidelines and is required by CEQA. For the trip generaƟon for the express wash, our recent studies are using diīerent numbers based on trip data collected from express car washes within the county. I have aƩached one study which took the average of three car washes in Santa Ana that we have been using for some of the more recent projects. Since the parcel is immediately adjacent to State Route 57, Caltrans will be noƟfied of the project and sent a copy of the environmental document to review, and they will comment on the traĸc study. Therefore, the two Caltrans intersecƟons will require a HCM 6 analysis as well as the ICU analysis for the City. Use Caltrans traĸc impact methodology to determine if there are impacts based on their methodology. I can provide some feedback in this area if this is diĸcult to obtainͲ Caltrans someƟmes isnt forthcoming regarding the impact criteria. For consistency, I would also recommend considering the queueing informaƟon for the same three sample car wash locaƟons in Santa Ana. I have aƩached those as well (I also included the Ɵtle page for referencing). We would like to use the same data set for consistency, however the study did not have parking informaƟon. Trip DistribuƟonͲ OutboundͲ please make NB Sunkist and NB 57 20% each. InboundͲ Add 10% SB on Sunkist, Reduce NB Sunkist to 5%, EB Ball to 25% Inbound Pass ͲbyͲ make Sunkist 5% in both direcƟons Thanks! David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 4 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 21 >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 2 attachments Car Wash Queue Sites.pdf . Trip Gen Car Wash Sites.pdf . Bryan Crawford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ind Regards, Bryan Crawford Senior Transportation Planner GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Santa Ana, CA 92705 o. 714 795 3100 x 104 c. 714 376 0224 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP ilan Golcheh LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP!7KX 'HF DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! &F *LDQFDUOR *DQGGLQL JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP! %U\DQ +RSH DOO LV ZHOO 3OHDVH JHW WKLV WR WKH FLW\ DVDS ,WV EHHQ D IHZ ZHHNV VLQFH ,YH FRQWUDFWHG ZLWK \RXU WHDP 7KDQN \RX >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ <image001.jpg> GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 5 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 22 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ <image001.jpg> GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ LPDJHSQJ! Kind Regards, Bryan Crawford Senior Transportation Planner GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 104 c. 714 376 0224 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!)UL 'HF DW 30 7R -HUHP\ .LQJ -HUHP\#JDQGGLQLFRP! &$' FKDQJHV >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Kind Regards, Bryan Crawford Senior Transportation Planner GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202 Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 6 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 23 Santa Ana, CA 92705 o. 714 795 3100 x 104 >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 2 attachments Car Wash Queue Sites.pdf . Trip Gen Car Wash Sites.pdf . David Kennedy '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW!)UL 'HF DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! HI Bryan, &XPXODWLYH SURMHFWV FDQ EH REWDLQHG IURP $QG\¶V 0DS KWWSDQDKHLPQHW'HYHORSPHQW$FWLYLW\ Thanks David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!)UL 'HF DW 30 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! &F *LDQFDUOR *DQGGLQL JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP! LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! 'DYLG 7KDQNV IRU WKH GLVFXVVLRQ HDUO\ UHJDUGLQJ WKLV SURMHFW DQG SURYLGLQJ WKH OLQN IRU FXPXODWLYH LQIR $WWDFKHG LV WKH UHYLVHG VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW EDVHG RQ \RXU FRPPHQWV DQG RXU GLVFXVVLRQ , OO SURYLGH WKH OLVW RI FXPXODWLYHV IRU UHYLHZ HDUO\ QH[W ZHHN DORQJ ZLWK &LW\ RI 2UDQJH SURMHFWV 7KDQN \RX >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 19-0202-Scope - Revised.pdf . Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!:HG 'HF DW 30 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 7 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 24 'DYLG $WWDFKHG LV WKH OLVW RI RWKHU GHYHORSPHQW WR EH XVHG LQ WKH UHSRUW IRU \RXU UHYLHZ $V \RX FDQ VHH , YH KLJKOLJKWHG ODQG XVH DQG TXDQWLWLHV WKDW ZH GRQ W KDYH LQIRUPDWLRQ IRU &DQ \RX UHYLHZ WKHVH SURMHFWV IRU DSSURYDOUHPRYDODGGLWLRQDO SURMHFWV WR EH DGGHG DQG ILOO LQ WKH PLVVLQJ ODQG XVHTXDQWLW\ LQIRUPDWLRQ RU GLUHFW PH WR WKH DSSURSULDWH SHUVRQ LQ 3ODQQLQJ ZKHUH , FDQ JHW WKLV LQIR" 7KDQN \RX >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 2 attachments OD List.pdf . Orange OD.pdf . David Kennedy '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW!)UL 'HF DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! Hi Bryan, I’ve taken a look at the items. For Noble Ale Works, the expansion replaces an 8,000 sf manufacturing tenant. I don’t have a breakdown of the new SF vs the old SF, but the vast majority of the expansion is for storage and manufacturing, which was essenƟally a net zero in trip generaƟon. So this can be removed from the list. Flamingo is a TI for a new owner, no expansion or change in use, so this can be removed. For the car wash, I aƩached the trip gen memo. In the Orange list, we only need the oĸce CUP, and the parking lot expansion if it generates new trips. I am oī next week and will be back on the 6th. Thanks and Happy New Year. David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Trip Generation Memo-COA comments.pdf . Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 8 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 25 ilan Golcheh LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP!0RQ -DQ DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! %U\DQ +RSH DOO LV ZHOO $Q\ XSGDWHV ZLWK WKH VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW" , QHHG WR VXEPLW DVDS >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ <image001.jpg> GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP From:David Kennedy [PDLOWR'.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW] Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2019 1:34 PM To:ilan Golcheh <LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP> Cc:Giancarlo Ganddini <JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP> Subject:RE: Tra ĸc Scoping Agreement Hi, I am out of the oĸce most of the day. I just got in, but will be in meeƟngs the next few hours. Giancarlo, could you please contact me by email? David Kennedy, P.E. Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department │ Traffic and Transportation (714) 765-4920 From:ilan Golcheh <LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP> Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2019 11:23 AM To:David Kennedy <'.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW> Cc:Giancarlo Ganddini <JLDQFDUOR#JDQGGLQLFRP> Subject:Re: Tra ĸc Scoping Agreement David, Hope all is well. I just wanted to follow up once again since our project is very time sensitive. Would you please give Giancarlo a call to discuss this scoping agreement? Thank you very much David. Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 9 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 26 His number is below Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP Principal <image001.jpg> GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 3DUNFHQWHU 'ULYH 6XLWH 6DQWD $QD &$ o. 714 795 3100 x 101 c. 949 735 9314 ZZZJDQGGLQLFRP >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ LPDJHSQJ! >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ 7ULS *HQHUDWLRQ 0HPR&2$ FRPPHQWVSGI! >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!7XH -DQ DW $0 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! 'DYLG 7KDQN \RX IRU WKLV LQIRUPDWLRQ DQG ZH KDYH XSGDWHG WKH OLVW DQG UHFHLYHG WKH WUDIILF FRXQWV IRU WKH SURMHFW &DQ \RX FRQILUP WKDW WKH UHYLVHG VFRSLQJ DJUHHPHQW LV DFFHSWDEOH EDVHG RQ WKH UHYLVLRQV PDGH WR LW DIWHU \RXU FRPPHQWV" 7KDQN \RX >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ David Kennedy '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW!:HG -DQ DW 30 7R %U\DQ &UDZIRUG EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP! &F LODQ *ROFKHK LODQ#JROFKHKJURXSFRP! Hi Bryan, The revised scoping with revisions is good. Please ensure the revised trip generaƟon table labels the correct sources for the diīerent land use informaƟon. Thanks >4XRWHG WH[W KLGGHQ@ Bryan Crawford EU\DQ#JDQGGLQLFRP!7KX -DQ DW $0 7R 'DYLG .HQQHG\ '.HQQHG\#DQDKHLPQHW! Gmail - RE: Traffic Scoping Agreement https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=62aeb8b5c5&view=pt&search=all... 10 of 13 1/10/2020, 1:25 PM Apx - 27 APPENDIX C VOLUME COUNT WORKSHEETS Apx - 28 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC2465 Thu, Dec 12, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:1 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM Ÿ PM N MD Ż W ( Ź OTHER S OTHER ź NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:120 2 202302 3 1 7:00 AM 5 26 43 165 104 57 35 228 10 74 195 48 990 7:15 AM 12 65 29 147 153 46 47 277 10 83 245 56 1,170 7:30 AM 5603514412955523281294243751,232 7:45 AM 73033137145603829615116242391,158 8:00 AM 6193810412241162861097272371,048 8:15 AM 817301251094116254116827720 976 8:30 AM 71534 9873451521487325829 869 8:45 AM 63335 8064291524047728138 902 VOLUMES 56 265 277 1,000 899 374 234 2,123 80 682 2,013 342 8,345 APPROACH %9% 44% 46% 44% 40% 16% 10% 87% 3% 22% 66% 11% APP/DEPART 598 /838 2,273 /1,651 2,437 /3,410 3,037 /2,446 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 30 174 135 532 549 202 153 1,187 47 390 1,002 207 4,608 APPROACH %9% 51% 40% 41% 43% 16% 11% 86% 3% 24% 63% 13% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.800 0.927 0.885 0.970 0.935 APP/DEPART 339 /533 1,283 /983 1,387 /1,857 1,599 /1,235 0 4:00 PM 8 101 63 71 78 33 50 253 9 77 309 112 1,164 4:15 PM 69849 7411437502066753261341,175 4:30 PM 10 114 73 80 113 36 61 301 11 57 371 139 1,366 4:45 PM 10 123 65 72 112 43 55 262 12 86 344 151 1,335 5:00 PM 11 123 80 60 120 28 74 287 8 79 375 164 1,409 5:15 PM 11 99 54 61 104 44 59 284 11 74 369 164 1,334 5:30 PM 13 129 71 64 130 36 66 276 8 61 316 163 1,333 5:45 PM 11 94 44 71 85 32 58 249 12 66 284 157 1,163 VOLUMES 80 881 499 553 856 289 473 2,118 77 575 2,694 1,184 10,279 APPROACH %5% 60% 34% 33% 50% 17% 18% 79% 3% 13% 60% 27% APP/DEPART 1,460 /2,524 1,698 /1,506 2,668 /3,174 4,453 /3,075 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 42 459 272 273 449 151 249 1,134 42 296 1,459 618 5,444 APPROACH %5% 59% 35% 31% 51% 17% 17% 80% 3% 12% 61% 26% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.903 0.953 0.955 0.960 0.966 APP/DEPART 773 /1,318 873 /788 1,425 /1,680 2,373 /1,658 0 AM 7:15 AM PM 4:30 PM Sunkist Sunkist Ball Ball INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Anaheim 6XQNLVW %DOO Apx - 29 91 1 1TOTAL 2 19 3M 22 AM 0 9 0 2 1 1 2 0 TO T A L 3M AM 1 2 0 A M 3 M T O T A L 2 1 1 1 0 2 2 AM 9 3M 10 1TOTAL 1 11 20 21 99 0TOTAL 11 3M 12 AM 1 9 9 2 9 2 2 9 2 2 1 TO T A L 3M AM $0 $0 $0 0 2 1$ A M 3 M T O T A L 2 2 1 30 30 30 9 2 1 2 1 2 1 AM 9 3M 11 Total 2 0 1112 SunNist SunNist SunNist Ba l l B a l l 3EAK +O8R AimTD LLC 7851,1* 029(0(17 &28176 SunNist Ba l l B a l l SC2 ALL +O8RS Anaheim Apx - 30 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC2465 Thu, Dec 12, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:2 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM Ÿ PM N MD Ż W ( Ź OTHER S OTHER ź NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:;;;0.5;1.5; 3 1 ; 3 1 7:00 AM 0 0 0 89 0 181 0 237 145 0 157 38 847 7:15 AM 000 92 02060251196018838971 7:30 AM 000124019302781960188421,021 7:45 AM 000140022602951830195291,068 8:00 AM 000129020302671810205371,022 8:15 AM 00012501810250155017737925 8:30 AM 00011702190222147014842895 8:45 AM 00011702370249143015357956 VOLUMES 0 0 0 933 0 1,646 0 2,049 1,346 0 1,411 320 7,705 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 36% 0% 64% 0% 60% 40% 0% 82% 18% APP/DEPART 0 /320 2,579 /1,346 3,395 /2,982 1,731 /3,057 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 0 0 485 0 828 0 1,091 756 0 776 146 4,082 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 37% 0% 63% 0% 59% 41% 0% 84% 16% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.897 0.966 0.952 0.956 APP/DEPART 0 /146 1,313 /756 1,847 /1,576 922 /1,604 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 90 0 175 0 302 89 0 372 60 1,088 4:15 PM 000 90 021802271010346421,024 4:30 PM 000 87 020203261210394441,174 4:45 PM 000105022303011180378631,188 5:00 PM 000103021802951060411771,210 5:15 PM 000112017702911050397521,134 5:30 PM 000 62 01490318970368471,041 5:45 PM 000 83 01270279850396531,023 VOLUMES 0 0 0 732 0 1,489 0 2,339 822 0 3,062 438 8,882 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 33% 0% 67% 0% 74% 26% 0% 87% 13% APP/DEPART 0 /438 2,221 /822 3,161 /3,071 3,500 /4,551 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 0 0 0 407 0 820 0 1,213 450 0 1,580 236 4,706 APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 33% 0% 67% 0% 73% 27% 0% 87% 13% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.935 0.930 0.930 0.972 APP/DEPART 0 /236 1,227 /450 1,663 /1,620 1,816 /2,400 0 AM 7:15 AM PM 4:30 PM SR57 SB RamSs SR57 SB RamSs Ball Ball INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Anaheim 65 6% 5DPSV %DOO Apx - 31 00 10 1TOTAL 2221 3M 29 AM 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 TO T A L 3M AM 0 0 A M 3 M T O T A L 2 1 0 1 1 9 AM 0 3M 0 21TOTAL 0 0 0 0 20 10 92 TOTAL 2 122 3M 11 AM 9 2 2 1 1 2 0 0 2 2 TO T A L 3M AM $0 $0 $0 0 0 1$ A M 3 M T O T A L 2 0 30 30 30 1 2 0 1 9 1 0 1 1 AM 0 3M 0 120Total 0 0 0 0 SR- SB Ramps SR- SB Ramps SR- SB Ramps Ba l l B a l l 3EAK +O8R AimTD LLC 7851,1* 029(0(17 &28176 SR- SB Ramps Ba l l B a l l SC2 ALL +O8RS Anaheim Apx - 32 DATE:LOCATION:PROJECT #:SC2465 Thu, Dec 12, 19 NORTH & SOUTH:LOCATION #:3 EAST & WEST:CONTROL:SIGNAL NOTES:AM Ÿ PM N MD Ż W ( Ź OTHER S OTHER ź NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:1 ;1 ;;;;31;31 7:00 AM 71 0 121 0 0 0 0 234 92 0 116 66 700 7:15 AM 88 0 103 0 0 0 0 250 93 0 138 81 753 7:30 AM 103 0 113 0 0 0 0 282 120 0 127 73 818 7:45 AM 88 0 142 0 0 0 0 343 96 0 136 96 901 8:00 AM 64 0 111 0 0 0 0 269 127 0 178 68 817 8:15 AM 59 0 128 0 0 0 0 268 107 0 155 70 787 8:30 AM 51 0 119 0 0 0 0 219 120 0 139 79 727 8:45 AM 60 0 77 0 0 0 0 238 128 0 150 92 745 VOLUMES 584 0 914 0 0 0 0 2,103 883 0 1,139 625 6,248 APPROACH % 39% 0% 61% 0% 0% 0% 0% 70% 30% 0% 65% 35% APP/DEPART 1,498 /625 0 /883 2,986 /3,017 1,764 /1,723 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 314 0 494 0 0 0 0 1,162 450 0 596 307 3,323 APPROACH % 39% 0% 61% 0% 0% 0% 0% 72% 28% 0% 66% 34% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.878 0.000 0.918 0.918 0.922 APP/DEPART 808 /307 0 /450 1,612 /1,656 903 /910 0 4:00 PM 119 0 66 0 0 0 0 251 141 0 313 116 1,006 4:15 PM 153 0 87 0 0 0 0 221 96 0 235 103 895 4:30 PM 154 0 72 0 0 0 0 290 123 0 284 115 1,038 4:45 PM 153 0 82 0 0 0 0 278 128 0 288 95 1,024 5:00 PM 154 0 82 0 0 0 0 250 148 0 340 106 1,080 5:15 PM 152 0 63 0 0 0 0 293 110 0 297 114 1,029 5:30 PM 156 0 96 0 0 0 0 275 109 0 259 99 994 5:45 PM 161 0 83 0 0 0 0 257 105 0 288 66 960 VOLUMES 1,202 0 631 0 0 0 0 2,115 960 0 2,304 814 8,026 APPROACH % 66% 0% 34% 0% 0% 0% 0% 69% 31% 0% 74% 26% APP/DEPART 1,833 /814 0 /960 3,075 /2,746 3,118 /3,506 0 BEGIN PEAK HR VOLUMES 613 0 299 0 0 0 0 1,111 509 0 1,209 430 4,171 APPROACH % 67% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 69% 31% 0% 74% 26% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.966 0.000 0.981 0.919 0.966 APP/DEPART 912 /430 0 /509 1,620 /1,410 1,639 /1,822 0 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com Anaheim 65 1% 5DPSV %DOO SR57 NB RamSs SR57 NB RamSs Ball Ball AM 7:30 AM PM 4:30 PM Apx - 33 0000TOTAL 19 0 3M 0 AM 1 1 1 2 22 9 1 9 TO T A L 3M AM 0 0 A M 3 M T O T A L 2 1 1 0 1 0 2 9 AM 19 3M 1 1TOTAL 10 1 1 0000TOTAL 0 3M 0 AM 9 0 1 9 2 2 2 2 1 0 TO T A L 3M AM $0 $0 $0 0 0 1$ A M 3 M T O T A L 2 2 30 30 30 9 9 0 2 2 1 2 0 1 1 2 AM 0 3M 912 99 Total 920 9 120 AimTD LLC 7851,1* 029(0(17 &28176 SR- 1B Ramps Ba l l B a l l SC2 ALL +O8RS Anaheim SR- 1B Ramps SR- 1B Ramps SR- 1B Ramps Ba l l B a l l 3EAK +O8R Apx - 34 APPENDIX D LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS Apx - 35 EXISTING Apx - 36 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AME.pdf Scenario 1 Existing AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.605NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.650SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 B-0.654EB RightICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 37 0.654Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 207100239047118715320254953213517430Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 522519812297385113713334448Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 38 0.654Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.200.110.240.240.050.220.220.160.090.090.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 39 0.650Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 077600109108280485000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 01940027302070121000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467760756109108280485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 40 0.650Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.150.000.000.210.000.390.000.290.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 41 0.605Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3075960450116200004940314Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7714901132910000124079Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3075960450116200004940314Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 42 0.605Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.180.120.000.260.230.000.000.000.000.290.000.18V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 43 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PME.pdf Scenario 1 Existing PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.710NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.721SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C-0.705WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 44 0.705Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 618145929642113424915144927327245942Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 15536574112846238112686811511Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 45 0.705Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.280.290.090.230.230.070.180.180.080.220.220.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 46 0.721Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0158000121308200407000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 03950030302050102000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23615800450121308200407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 47 0.721Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.310.000.000.240.000.360.000.240.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 48 0.710Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43012090509111100002990613Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10830201272780000750153Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43012090509111100002990613Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 49 0.710Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.250.240.000.300.220.000.000.000.000.180.000.36V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 50 EXISTING ‐ CALTRANS Apx - 51 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AME.pdf Scenario 1 Existing AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B12.90.743NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B15.50.757SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 52 0.757Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 081200114108660507000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02030028502170127000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467760756109108280485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 53 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 54 0.00112.500.00155.41308.36284.1895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.004.500.006.2212.3311.3795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0062.500.0086.34194.11175.5450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.500.003.457.767.0250th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0014.240.0015.0018.0215.40d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.420.000.580.890.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.650.000.283.912.10d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0013.590.0014.7214.1013.30d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60919526091952769835c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891727s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.160.000.220.430.40(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.380.380.380.380.480.48g / C, Green / Cycle 232323232929gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 55 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 15.40 0.00 17.47 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.24 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.71 15.00 14.24 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.52 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.757 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.364 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.398 2.187 2.006 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 56 0.743Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3336460488126000005360341Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8316201223150000134085Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3075960450116200004940314Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 57 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 58 119.0962.22178.62136.40269.56143.4895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.762.497.145.4610.785.7495th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 66.1634.5799.2375.78164.4279.7150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.651.383.973.036.583.1950th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BABBCBLane Group LOS 12.199.6412.7211.0420.7914.42d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.440.270.640.520.870.49;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 1.840.270.910.173.860.54d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 10.359.3711.8110.8716.9313.87d1, Uniform Delay [s] 76024357602435618692c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.210.130.310.250.340.19(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.480.480.480.480.390.39g / C, Green / Cycle 292929292323gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 59 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.42 0.00 20.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.04 12.72 0.00 9.64 12.19 Movement LOS B C B B A B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]18.31 0.00 11.51 10.50 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]12.89 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.743 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.361 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.521 2.098 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 60 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PME.pdf Scenario 1 Existing PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B14.00.794NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.60.827SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 61 0.827Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0162600124808440419000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04060031202110105000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23615800450121308200407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 62 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 63 0.00250.450.00161.18293.53274.9995th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0010.020.006.4511.7411.0095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00150.020.0089.55182.69168.5450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.000.003.587.316.7450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0017.820.0013.8518.7216.51d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.770.000.590.880.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.002.750.000.263.732.20d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.070.0013.5914.9914.32d1, Uniform Delay [s] 66021166602116717773c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891712s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.320.000.250.400.37(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.420.420.420.420.450.45g / C, Green / Cycle 252525252727gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 64 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.51 0.00 18.16 0.00 13.85 0.00 0.00 17.82 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 17.62 13.85 17.82 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]16.56 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.827 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.328 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.216 2.246 2.454 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 65 0.794Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 44512520527115000003100635Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11131301322880000770159Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 43012090509111100002990613Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 66 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 67 191.90150.24208.55128.28125.52302.9595th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 7.686.018.345.135.0212.1295th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 107.0683.47119.0771.2769.73189.9450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.283.344.762.852.797.6050th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBBLane Group LOS 16.0212.5614.5511.5313.6119.82d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.610.540.720.490.480.87;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 3.790.891.380.160.553.48d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 12.2311.6713.1711.3713.0616.34d1, Uniform Delay [s] 72923367292336649727c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.280.250.330.230.200.36(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.460.460.460.460.410.41g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282424gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 68 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.82 0.00 13.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.53 14.55 0.00 12.56 16.02 Movement LOS B B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.78 0.00 12.48 13.47 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]14.03 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.794 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.396 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.482 2.493 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 1: 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 69 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Apx - 70 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/13/2020Report File: C:\...\AMEP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.611NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.656SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C19.50.095SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)4 C20.60.167SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)3 B-0.666EB RightICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 B10.20.032WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopSunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/13/20201 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 71 0.032Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Sunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2301283827534Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6032127134Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 2301283827534Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 100110Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 22007260Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00128300534Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20202 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 72 BIntersection LOS 0.16d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.190.050.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.480.000.000.600.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.100.000.000.020.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAAMovement LOS 10.190.000.008.610.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.030.000.010.010.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20203 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 73 0.666Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 207103742547118717420254953213517930Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5225910612297445113713334458Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 207103742547118717420254953213517930Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 035350021000050Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20204 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 74 0.666Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.200.130.240.240.050.220.220.160.090.090.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/20205 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 75 0.167Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 20.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 32162718770460Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 84074690120Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 32162718770460Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 200010Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3025260450Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 016021851000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20206 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 76 CIntersection LOS 0.27d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0020.65d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0014.710.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.590.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0020.650.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.170.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20207 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 77 0.095Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 19.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 32163218770260Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8408469070Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 32163218770260Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 200010Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3030260250Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 016021851000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20208 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 78 CIntersection LOS 0.14d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0019.47d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.007.760.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.310.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0019.470.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.090.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20209 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 79 0.656Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 079600110408380485000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 01990027602100121000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467960761110408380485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020051301000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202010 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 80 0.656Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.160.000.000.220.000.390.000.290.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202011 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 81 0.611Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3076060460116500004940324Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7715201152910000124081Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3076060460116500004940324Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 010010300000010Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202012 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 82 0.611Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.180.120.000.270.230.000.000.000.000.290.000.19V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202013 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 83 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/13/2020Report File: C:\...\PMEP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.725NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.730SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 E36.90.248SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)4 E45.70.426SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)3 C-0.723WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 B15.00.079WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopSunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/13/20201 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 84 0.079Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Sunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 31087311381326Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 80218310332Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 31087311381326Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 400250Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 27009330Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00873001326Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20202 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 85 BIntersection LOS 0.26d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 14.960.150.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 6.400.000.001.690.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.260.000.000.070.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BABAAMovement LOS 14.960.000.0012.370.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.080.000.010.020.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20203 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 86 0.723Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 618150133842113427615144927327246542Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 15537585112846938112686811611Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 618150133842113427615144927327246542Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 042420027000060Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20204 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 87 0.723Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.280.290.100.230.230.080.180.180.080.220.220.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/20205 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 88 0.426Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 45.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 44241817020640Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 116054260160Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 44241817020640Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 6000100Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3831310540Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 023871671000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20206 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 89 EIntersection LOS 0.69d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAEApproach LOS 0.000.0045.69d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0047.370.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.001.890.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAEMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0045.690.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.430.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20207 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 90 0.248Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 36.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43242517020370Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11606426090Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43242517020370Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 500060Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3838310310Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 023871671000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20208 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 91 EIntersection LOS 0.32d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAEApproach LOS 0.000.0036.86d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0023.170.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.930.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAEMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0036.860.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.250.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20209 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 92 0.730Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0160600122808330407000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04020030702080102000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23616060456122808330407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 026061501300000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202010 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 93 0.730Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.310.000.000.240.000.360.000.240.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202011 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 94 0.725Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43012220521111400002990626Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10830601302790000750157Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43012220521111400002990626Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 013012300000013Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202012 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 95 0.725Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.250.240.000.310.220.000.000.000.000.180.000.37V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202013 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 96 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ‐ CALTRANS Apx - 97 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMEP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B12.90.751NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B15.60.764SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 98 0.764Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 083300115508770507000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02080028902190127000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467960761110408380485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020051301000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 99 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 100 0.00116.920.00159.14309.80285.3695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.004.680.006.3712.3911.4195th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0064.960.0088.41195.23176.4450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.600.003.547.817.0650th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0014.500.0015.2217.9515.33d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.430.000.600.890.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.700.000.303.942.11d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0013.800.0014.9314.0213.21d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60419366041936774840c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891725s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.160.000.230.440.40(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.380.380.380.380.490.49g / C, Green / Cycle 232323232929gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 101 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 15.33 0.00 17.40 0.00 15.22 0.00 0.00 14.50 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.64 15.22 14.50 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.63 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.764 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.367 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.416 2.195 2.018 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 102 0.751Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3336570499126400005360351Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8316401253160000134088Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3076060460116500004940324Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 010010300000010Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 103 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 104 119.1563.48184.86137.05269.36148.7195th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.772.547.395.4810.775.9595th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 66.1935.26102.7076.14164.2782.6250th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.651.414.113.056.573.3050th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BABBCBLane Group LOS 12.199.6712.9011.0620.7714.54d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.440.270.660.520.870.51;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 1.840.270.970.173.860.58d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 10.359.4011.9310.8916.9113.96d1, Uniform Delay [s] 75924347592434618693c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.210.130.310.250.340.20(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.480.480.480.480.390.39g / C, Green / Cycle 292929292323gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 105 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.54 0.00 20.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.06 12.90 0.00 9.67 12.19 Movement LOS B C B B A B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]18.30 0.00 11.58 10.52 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]12.93 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.751 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.368 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.529 2.104 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 106 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMEP.pdf Scenario 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B14.30.811NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.90.837WB ThruHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 107 0.837Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0165200126308570419000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04130031602140105000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23616060456122808330407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 026061501300000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 108 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 109 0.00258.580.00165.49295.26276.5095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0010.340.006.6211.8111.0695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00156.120.0091.94184.02169.6950th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.240.003.687.366.7950th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0018.480.0014.1118.6216.41d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.790.000.600.880.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.003.090.000.283.742.21d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.390.0013.8314.8814.21d1, Uniform Delay [s] 65420966542096724779c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891710s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.320.000.250.400.37(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.410.410.410.410.460.46g / C, Green / Cycle 252525252727gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 110 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.41 0.00 18.06 0.00 14.11 0.00 0.00 18.48 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 17.52 14.11 18.48 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]16.87 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.837 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.332 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.238 2.254 2.468 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 111 0.811Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 44512650539115300003100648Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11131601352880000770162Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 43012220521111400002990626Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 013012300000013Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 112 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 113 195.61155.78218.71131.49123.27306.5795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 7.826.238.755.264.9312.2695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 109.7186.54126.4973.0568.48192.7350th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.393.465.062.922.747.7150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBBLane Group LOS 16.5712.9815.3011.8613.2619.61d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.620.550.750.500.470.88;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 4.010.951.620.170.523.48d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 12.5612.0313.6811.6912.7416.12d1, Uniform Delay [s] 71722997172299660740c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.280.250.340.230.200.36(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.450.450.450.450.420.42g / C, Green / Cycle 272727272525gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 114 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.61 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.86 15.30 0.00 12.98 16.57 Movement LOS B B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.55 0.00 12.95 13.92 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]14.34 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.811 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.404 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.490 2.500 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 2: 2 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 115 EXISTING PLUS CUMULATIVE Apx - 116 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMEC.pdf Scenario 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.605NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.650SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 B-0.654EB RightICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 117 0.654Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 207100239047118715320254953213517430Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 522519812297385113713334448Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 118 0.654Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.200.110.240.240.050.220.220.160.090.090.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 119 0.650Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 077600109108280485000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 01940027302070121000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467760756109108280485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 120 0.650Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.150.000.000.210.000.390.000.290.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 121 0.605Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3075960450116200004940314Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 7714901132910000124079Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3075960450116200004940314Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 122 0.605Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.180.120.000.260.230.000.000.000.000.290.000.18V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 123 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMEC.pdf Scenario 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.711NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.721SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C-0.705WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 124 0.705Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 618146229642113724915144927327245942Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 15536674112846238112686811511Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 618146229642113724915144927327245942Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030030000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 125 0.705Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.280.290.090.230.230.070.180.180.080.220.220.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 126 0.721Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0158300121508200407000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 03960030402050102000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23615830451121508200407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030120000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 127 0.721Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.310.000.000.240.000.360.000.240.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 128 0.711Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43012110509111300002990614Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10830301272780000750154Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43012110509111300002990614Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020020000001Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 129 0.711Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.250.240.000.300.220.000.000.000.000.180.000.36V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 130 EXISTING PLUS CUMULATIVE ‐ CALTRANS Apx - 131 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMEC.pdf Scenario 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B12.90.743NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B15.50.757SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 132 0.757Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 081200114108660507000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02030028502170127000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1467760756109108280485000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 133 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 134 0.00112.500.00155.41308.36284.1895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.004.500.006.2212.3311.3795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0062.500.0086.34194.11175.5450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.500.003.457.767.0250th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0014.240.0015.0018.0215.40d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.420.000.580.890.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.650.000.283.912.10d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0013.590.0014.7214.1013.30d1, Uniform Delay [s] 60919526091952769835c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891727s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.160.000.220.430.40(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.380.380.380.380.480.48g / C, Green / Cycle 232323232929gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 135 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 15.40 0.00 17.47 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.24 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.71 15.00 14.24 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.52 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.757 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.364 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.398 2.187 2.006 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 136 0.743Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3336460488126000005360341Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8316201223150000134085Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3075960450116200004940314Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 137 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 138 119.0962.22178.62136.40269.56143.4895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.762.497.145.4610.785.7495th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 66.1634.5799.2375.78164.4279.7150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.651.383.973.036.583.1950th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BABBCBLane Group LOS 12.199.6412.7211.0420.7914.42d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.440.270.640.520.870.49;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 1.840.270.910.173.860.54d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 10.359.3711.8110.8716.9313.87d1, Uniform Delay [s] 76024357602435618692c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.210.130.310.250.340.19(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.480.480.480.480.390.39g / C, Green / Cycle 292929292323gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 139 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.42 0.00 20.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.04 12.72 0.00 9.64 12.19 Movement LOS B C B B A B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]18.31 0.00 11.51 10.50 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]12.89 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.743 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.361 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.521 2.098 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 140 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMEC.pdf Scenario 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B14.00.795NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.60.827SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 141 0.827Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0162900125008440419000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04070031302110105000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 23615830451121508200407000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030120000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 142 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 143 0.00251.090.00161.53293.53274.9995th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0010.040.006.4611.7411.0095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00150.490.0089.74182.69168.5450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.020.003.597.316.7450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0017.860.0013.8618.7216.51d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.770.000.590.880.82;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.002.770.000.263.732.20d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.080.0013.6014.9914.32d1, Uniform Delay [s] 66021166602116717773c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891712s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.320.000.250.400.37(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.420.420.420.420.450.45g / C, Green / Cycle 252525252727gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 144 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.51 0.00 18.16 0.00 13.86 0.00 0.00 17.86 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 17.62 13.86 17.86 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]16.58 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.827 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.328 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.216 2.247 2.456 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 145 0.795Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 44512540527115200003100636Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11131301322880000770159Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 43012110509111300002990614Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020020000001Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 146 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 147 192.19150.84208.86128.80125.34303.2295th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 7.696.038.355.155.0112.1395th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 107.2783.80119.2971.5569.64190.1550th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.293.354.772.862.797.6150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBBLane Group LOS 16.0612.6014.5811.5613.5819.80d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.610.540.720.490.480.87;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 3.810.891.390.160.543.48d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 12.2511.7013.2011.4013.0416.32d1, Uniform Delay [s] 72823337282333650728c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.280.250.330.230.200.36(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.460.460.460.460.410.41g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282525gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 148 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.80 0.00 13.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.56 14.58 0.00 12.60 16.06 Movement LOS B B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.76 0.00 12.51 13.50 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]14.05 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.795 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.396 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.483 2.494 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 3: 3 Existing Plus Cumulative PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 149 OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT Apx - 150 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMOYWO.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.628NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.674SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 B-0.678EB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 151 0.678Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 215104240649123415921057155314018131Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5426110212309405314313835458Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 215104240649123415921057155314018131Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 152 0.678Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.200.120.250.250.050.230.230.160.090.090.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 153 0.674Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 080700113508610504000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02020028402150126000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1528070786113508610504000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 154 0.674Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.160.000.000.220.000.400.000.300.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 155 0.628Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3196200468120800005140327Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8015501173020000129082Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3196200468120800005140327Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 156 0.628Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.190.120.000.280.240.000.000.000.000.300.000.19V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 157 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMOYWO.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.737NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.748SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C-0.731WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 158 0.731Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 643152030844118225915746728428347744Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16138077112966539117717111911Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 643152030844118225915746728428347744Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030030000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 159 0.731Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.290.300.090.240.240.080.180.180.080.220.220.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 160 0.748Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0164600126408530423000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04120031602130106000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 24516460469126408530423000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030120000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20204 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 161 0.748Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.320.000.000.250.000.380.000.250.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20205 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 162 0.737Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 44712590529115700003110639Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11231501322890000780160Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 44712590529115700003110639Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020020000001Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 163 0.737Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.260.250.000.310.230.000.000.000.000.180.000.38V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 164 OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT – CALTRANS Apx - 165 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMOYWO.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B13.40.773NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.00.787SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 166 0.787Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 084400118709010527000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02110029702250132000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1528070786113508610504000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 167 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 168 0.00122.200.00169.85315.91289.3395th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.004.890.006.7912.6411.5795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0067.890.0094.36199.96179.4850th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.720.003.778.007.1850th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0015.150.0015.9917.7815.00d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.450.000.630.900.83;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.780.000.364.082.13d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0014.370.0015.6313.7012.87d1, Uniform Delay [s] 58518755851875793861c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891726s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.170.000.230.450.41(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.370.370.370.370.500.50g / C, Green / Cycle 222222223030gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 169 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 17.20 0.00 15.99 0.00 0.00 15.15 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.39 15.99 15.15 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.95 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.787 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.382 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.489 2.212 2.024 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 170 0.773Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3466720508131000005570355Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8616801273280000139089Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3196200468120800005140327Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 171 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 172 130.9367.88196.35149.88275.53146.1095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 5.242.727.856.0011.025.8495th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 72.7437.71110.2583.27168.9481.1750th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.911.514.413.336.763.2550th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BBBBCBLane Group LOS 13.1410.2213.8111.8020.3513.92d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.470.280.690.550.870.50;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 2.130.301.150.203.850.53d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 11.019.9212.6611.6016.5113.39d1, Uniform Delay [s] 73823657382365640717c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.220.130.320.260.350.20(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.460.460.460.460.400.40g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282424gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 173 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]13.92 0.00 20.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.80 13.81 0.00 10.22 13.14 Movement LOS B C B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.85 0.00 12.36 11.22 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]13.39 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.773 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.379 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.560 2.120 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 174 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMOYWO.pdf Scenario 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B15.00.822NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B17.50.860WB ThruHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 175 0.860Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 17.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0169300130008780435000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04230032502190109000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 24516460469126408530423000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 030120000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 176 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 024002400036000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 177 0.00271.440.00174.25306.76284.9695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0010.860.006.9712.2711.4095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00165.840.0096.80192.88176.1350th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.630.003.877.727.0550th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0019.540.0014.5019.1916.60d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.820.000.630.900.83;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.003.720.000.324.282.40d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.830.0014.1914.9114.20d1, Uniform Delay [s] 64620726462072731787c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891711s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.330.000.260.410.38(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.410.410.410.410.460.46g / C, Green / Cycle 242424242828gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 178 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.60 0.00 18.54 0.00 14.50 0.00 0.00 19.54 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 17.90 14.50 19.54 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]17.52 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.860 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.344 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 667 667 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 13.33 13.33 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.299 2.275 2.491 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 179 0.822Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 46313030548119800003220661Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11632601372990000800165Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 44712590529115700003110639Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020020000001Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 180 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 024002400000036Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 181 213.80171.24233.37146.10132.14319.6395th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 8.556.859.335.845.2912.7995th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 122.9095.13137.2981.1773.41202.8450th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 4.923.815.493.252.948.1150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBBLane Group LOS 17.9013.7416.2112.5413.4719.89d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.650.570.770.530.480.88;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 4.571.041.790.190.533.48d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 13.3312.6914.4112.3512.9416.41d1, Uniform Delay [s] 71222827122282672753c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.290.260.340.240.200.37(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.450.450.450.450.420.42g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282626gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 626262626262C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 182 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]19.89 0.00 13.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.54 16.21 0.00 13.74 17.90 Movement LOS B B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.78 0.00 13.69 14.83 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.03 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.822 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.415 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 667 667 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 13.33 13.33 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.520 2.531 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 4: 4 Opening Year Without Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 183 OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT Apx - 184 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/13/2020Report File: C:\...\AMOYW.pdf Scenario 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B-0.634NB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B-0.680SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 C20.30.099SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)4 C21.60.175SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)3 B-0.690EB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 B10.30.033WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopSunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/13/20201 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 185 0.033Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Sunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2301334827555Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 6033427139Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 2301334827555Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 100110Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 22007260Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.001.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00128300534Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20202 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 186 BIntersection LOS 0.16d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BAAApproach LOS 10.270.050.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.520.000.000.610.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.100.000.000.020.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] BAAAAMovement LOS 10.270.000.008.670.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.030.000.010.010.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20203 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 187 0.690Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 215107744149123418021057155314018631Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 5426911012309455314313835478Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 215107744149123418021057155314018631Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 035350021000050Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 207100239047118715320254953213517430Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20204 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 188 0.690Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.210.130.250.250.050.230.230.160.100.100.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/20205 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 189 0.175Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 21.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 32169119510460Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 84234880120Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 32169119510460Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 200010Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3025260450Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.001.041.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 016021851000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20206 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 190 CIntersection LOS 0.27d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0021.59d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0015.560.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.620.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0021.590.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.180.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20207 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 191 0.099Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 20.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 32169619510260Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8424488070Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 32169619510260Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 200010Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3030260250Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.001.041.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 016021851000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20208 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 192 CIntersection LOS 0.14d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AACApproach LOS 0.000.0020.27d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.008.180.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.000.330.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAACMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0020.270.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.020.020.000.100.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20209 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 193 0.680Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 082700114808710504000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02070028702180126000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1528270791114808710504000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020051301000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202010 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 194 0.680Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.000.160.000.000.230.000.400.000.300.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202011 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 195 0.634Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 3196300478121100005140337Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8015801203030000129084Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 3196300478121100005140337Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 010010300000010Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202012 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 196 0.634Intersection V/C BIntersection LOS 0.190.120.000.280.240.000.000.000.000.300.000.20V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202013 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 197 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/13/2020Report File: C:\...\PMOYW.pdf Scenario 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C-0.752NB LeftICU 1SignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 C-0.757SB RightICU 1SignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 E40.30.267SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)4 F51.20.460SB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopProject West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)3 C-0.749WB ThruICU 1SignalizedSunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)2 C15.40.082WB RightHCM 6th EditionTwo-way stopSunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW)1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/13/20201 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 198 0.082Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 15.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 1: Sunkist St (NS) at Project Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftThruLeftRightThruTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 31090811381379Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 80227310345Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 31090811381379Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 400250Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 27009330Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.001.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 00873001326Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20202 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 199 CIntersection LOS 0.26d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CAAApproach LOS 15.410.150.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 6.680.000.001.770.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.270.000.000.070.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] CABAAMovement LOS 15.410.000.0012.730.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.080.000.010.020.000.01V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20203 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 200 0.749Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 2: Sunkist St (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0035.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 643156235044118228615746728428348344Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16139188112967239117717112111Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 643156235044118228615746728428348344Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 045420327000060Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.041.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 618145929642113424915144927327245942Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20204 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 201 0.749Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.290.310.100.240.240.080.180.180.080.230.230.03V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --Lead--Lead--Lead--LeadLead / Lag 1,4Auxiliary Signal Groups 447083061025Signal group OverlapPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/20205 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 202 0.460Volume to Capacity (v/c): FLevel Of Service: 51.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 3: Project West Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 44251617720640Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 116294430160Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 44251617720640Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 6000100Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3834340540Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.001.041.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 023871671000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20206 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 203 FIntersection LOS 0.75d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAFApproach LOS 0.000.0051.21d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0052.250.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.002.090.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAFMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0051.210.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.030.020.000.460.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20207 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 204 0.267Volume to Capacity (v/c): ELevel Of Service: 40.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: Intersection 4: Project East Dwy (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruThruLeftRightLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 43252317720370Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11631443090Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 43252317720370Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 500060Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 3841340310Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.041.001.041.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 023871671000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/20208 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 205 EIntersection LOS 0.34d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAEApproach LOS 0.000.0040.25d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.0025.340.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.000.000.000.001.010.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] AAAEMovement LOS 0.000.000.000.0040.250.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.030.020.000.270.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median NoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] Flared Lane FreeFreeStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings 1/13/20209 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 206 0.757Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0167200127908660423000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04180032002170106000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 24516720475127908660423000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 029071701300000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202010 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 207 0.757Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.000.330.000.000.250.000.380.000.250.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202011 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 208 0.752Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: -Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: ICU 1Analysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 44712720541116000003110652Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11231801352900000780163Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 44712720541116000003110652Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 015012500000014Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/13/202012 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 209 0.752Intersection V/C CIntersection LOS 0.260.250.000.320.230.000.000.000.000.180.000.38V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 5.00Lost time [s] 100Cycle Length [s] Intersection Settings 1/13/202013 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 210 OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT ‐ CALTRANS Apx - 211 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\AMOYW.pdf Scenario 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\AME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B13.40.780NB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B16.10.794SB RightHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 212 0.794Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 16.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 086500120109110527000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02160030002280132000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.95600.95601.00000.95600.95601.00000.95601.00000.95601.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 1528270791114808710504000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 020051301000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1467760756109108280485000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 213 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100039000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 214 0.00126.780.00173.68317.25290.3895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.005.070.006.9512.6911.6295th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.0070.430.0096.49201.00180.2850th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.002.820.003.868.047.2150th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoNoYesYesNoCritical Lane Group ABABBBLane Group LOS 0.0015.410.0016.2117.7314.94d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.460.000.650.900.83;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.000.840.000.384.112.15d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0014.570.0015.8313.6212.79d1, Uniform Delay [s] 58118615811861797865c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891725s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.170.000.240.450.42(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.370.370.370.370.500.50g / C, Green / Cycle 222222223030gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 215 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 14.94 0.00 17.14 0.00 16.21 0.00 0.00 15.41 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A B A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 16.34 16.21 15.41 Approach LOS A B B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]16.06 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.794 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.385 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.505 2.220 2.035 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 216 0.780Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 3466830518131300005570366Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8617101303280000139091Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92200.92201.00000.92200.92201.00001.00001.00001.00000.92201.00000.9220Peak Hour Factor 3196300478121100005140337Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 010010300000010Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3075960450116200004940314Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 217 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 021002100000039Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 218 131.0669.24201.28150.49275.23151.7895th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 5.242.778.056.0211.016.0795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 72.8138.47113.8083.61168.7284.3250th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 2.911.544.553.346.753.3750th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group BBBBCBLane Group LOS 13.1610.2714.0211.8220.3114.04d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.470.290.700.560.870.51;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 2.140.311.230.213.820.56d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 11.029.9612.7911.6216.4913.48d1, Uniform Delay [s] 73823647382364640717c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.220.130.330.260.350.21(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.460.460.460.460.400.40g / C, Green / Cycle 282828282424gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 219 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.04 0.00 20.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.82 14.02 0.00 10.27 13.16 Movement LOS B C B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]17.83 0.00 12.45 11.24 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]13.43 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.780 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.386 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 567 567 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 15.41 15.41 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.567 2.126 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project AM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 220 Intersection Analysis Summary 1/9/2020Report File: C:\...\PMOYW.pdf Scenario 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak HourVistro File: C:\...\PME.vistro Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B15.80.833NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)6 B17.80.871WB ThruHCM 6th EditionSignalizedSR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW)5 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID 1/9/20201 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 221 0.871Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 17.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 5: SR-57 SB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoYesNoCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 0172000131608910435000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 04300032902230109000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0.00001.00001.00000.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97200.97201.00000.97200.97201.00000.97201.00000.97201.00001.00001.0000Peak Hour Factor 24516720475127908660423000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 029071701300000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.041.001.041.001.001.00Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 23615800450121308200407000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20202 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 222 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.02.00.00.00.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000010000Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070007000Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Vehicle Extension [s] 025002500035000Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.01.00.00.00.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.03.00.00.00.0Amber [s] 012000120000120000Maximum Green [s] 050050005000Minimum Green [s] --------Lead---Lead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080001000Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20203 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 223 0.00278.660.00177.48312.24289.0795th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.0011.150.007.1012.4911.5695th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 0.00171.330.0098.60197.12179.2850th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 0.006.850.003.947.887.1750th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoYesNoNoYesNoCritical Lane Group ACABBBLane Group LOS 0.0020.060.0014.6119.5716.79d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.000.830.000.640.910.84;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 0.004.070.000.334.592.53d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 0.0015.990.0014.2814.9814.26d1, Uniform Delay [s] 64520696452069732788c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891710s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.000.340.000.260.420.39(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.410.410.410.410.460.46g / C, Green / Cycle 242424242828gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 606060606060C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRCLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20204 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 224 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.00 0.00 0.00 16.79 0.00 18.86 0.00 14.61 0.00 0.00 20.06 0.00 Movement LOS B B B A C A dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]0.00 18.18 14.61 20.06 Approach LOS A B B C dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]17.84 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.871 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]0.00 20.01 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.349 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 700 700 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 12.68 12.68 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 6.320 2.283 2.506 Bicycle LOS D F B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------8-Ring 2 --------------41Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20205 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 225 0.833Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 15.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 6: SR-57 NB Ramps (NS) at Ball Rd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report NoNoNoYesCrosswalk NoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 40.0040.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000vBab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000vBci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000vBco, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000vBdi, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000vBdo, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 46313170560120100003220675Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11632901403000000800169Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.96600.96601.00000.96600.96601.00001.00001.00001.00000.96601.00000.9660Peak Hour Factor 44712720541116000003110652Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 015012500000014Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.041.041.001.041.041.001.001.001.001.041.001.04Growth Factor 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 43012090509111100002990613Base Volume Input [veh/h] Name Volumes 1/9/20206 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 226 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group E[clusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoRest In Walk 010001000000010Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070000007Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 024002400000036Split [s] 0.01.00.00.01.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.0Amber [s] 012000120000000120Maximum Green [s] 050050000005Minimum Green [s] -----------LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 040080000005Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissControl Type Phasing & Timing 8.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern IsolatedCoordination Type 60Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings 1/9/20207 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 227 224.60187.05254.61158.36140.59345.8095th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 8.987.4810.186.335.6213.8395th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] 130.81103.92153.1487.9878.11223.2750th-Percentile 4ueue Length [ft/ln] 5.234.166.133.523.128.9350th-Percentile 4ueue Length [veh/ln] NoNoYesNoNoYesCritical Lane Group BBBBBCLane Group LOS 18.4714.4117.2213.1513.9520.94d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.650.570.780.520.470.89;, volume / capacity Lane *roup Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial 4ueue Delay [s] 4.501.061.930.190.513.69d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.500.500.110.110.110.11k, delay calibration 13.9813.3615.2912.9613.4317.25d1, Uniform Delay [s] 71522927152292680762c, Capacity [veh/h] 158950941589509415891781s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.290.260.350.240.200.38(v / s)Bi Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.450.450.450.450.430.43g / C, Green / Cycle 292929292828gBi, Effective Green Time [s] 2.002.002.002.002.002.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.000.000.000.000.00l1Bp, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.004.004.004.004.004.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 656565656565C, Cycle Length [s] RCRCRLLane Group Lane *roup Calculations 1/9/20208 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 228 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results dBM, Delay for Movement [s/veh]20.94 0.00 13.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.15 17.22 0.00 14.41 18.47 Movement LOS C B B B B B dBA, Approach Delay [s/veh]18.68 0.00 14.44 15.47 Approach LOS B A B B dBI, Intersection Delay [s/veh]15.78 Intersection LOS B Intersection V/C 0.833 Other Modes gBWalk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MBcorner, Corner Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MBCW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ftð/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dBp, Pedestrian Delay [s]20.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 IBp,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.424 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F F F sBb, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 cBb, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]0 0 667 667 dBb, Bicycle Delay [s]30.00 30.00 13.33 13.33 IBb,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 4.132 4.132 2.528 2.539 Bicycle LOS D D B B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 --------------85Ring 2 --------------4-Ring 1 SeTuence 1/9/20209 Scenario 5: 5 Opening Year With Project PM Peak Hour Ball-Sunkist 7-Eleven & Car Wash Version 6.00-03 Generated with Apx - 229 APPENDIX E PARKING AND QUEUING DATA Apx - 230 AT:sl/rk15442.doc JN:2837-2019-01 GREENFOREST CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Anaheim, California Prepared for: Ms. Tricia Knott GREEN JET EXPRESS LLC. 235 West Florence Avenue Inglewood, CA 90301 Prepared by: RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Mohammad “Alex” Tabrizi, PE, TE Jethro Narciso, EIT Michael Torres July 31, 2019 Apx - 231 6-1 6.0 Access, On-Site Circulation and Queuing 6.1 Project Access Access for the site is currently provided as follows: • One inbound/outbound access driveway serving as the west leg of the signalized State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection. This access is currently controlled by the traffic signal and dedicated signal heads at this location; and • One inbound/outbound unsignalized access driveway located immediately south of the signalized State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection. The proposed project is planned to allow one-way on-site circulation with vehicles entering the site at the State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection and exiting the car wash at the south boundary of the site. Access for the proposed project is planned to be provided as follows: • One inbound access driveway serving as the west leg of the signalized State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection; and • One outbound unsignalized access driveway located immediately south of the signalized State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection. 6.2 On-Site Circulation Vehicles enter the project site from the north/main signalized driveway and proceed to access the automated car wash tunnel. Two drive aisles provide storage for vehicles waiting to enter the car wash and use the pay station before merging into a single aisle to access the car wash tunnel. A one-way escape lane is provided for vehicles to by-pass the car wash and exit the site. Vehicles proceed through the car wash tunnel. Upon exiting the car wash tunnel, vehicles may leave the site or proceed to use one of the self-serve vacuum parking stalls. 6.3 Queuing Vehicles may queue on-site while waiting to use the automated pay station and enter the car wash tunnel. Adequate storage space should be provided to ensure vehicles do not queue back onto State College Boulevard. Apx - 232 6-2 RK performed observed traffic counts at three (3) existing car wash facilities to obtain reference data on automated car wash queues. Table 6-1 shows the results of the observed queueing survey during weekday conditions and Table 6-2 shows the observed queuing results on Saturday. TABLE 6-1 Observed Car Wash Queuing - Weekday Observed Car Wash Location1 Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue (Vehicles) Scrub Bot Express Car Wash (1807 Main Street) 3 Zaroo Express Car Wash (1205 W. 17th Street ) 2 Santa Ana Express Car Wash (202 E. First Street) 5 Average 4 1 Weekday observed traffic counts conducted on Thursday, March 14, 2019. TABLE 6-2 Observed Car Wash Queuing - Saturday Observed Car Wash Location1 Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue (Vehicles) Scrub Bot Express Car Wash (1807 Main Street) 5 Zaroo Express Car Wash (1205 W. 17th Street ) 6 Santa Ana Express Car Wash (202 E. First Street) 14 Average 9 1 Saturday observed traffic counts conducted on Saturday, March 16, 2019. Queuing surveys were performed during the peak traffic generating hour observed on both weekday and Saturday conditions. The 95th percentile queue is calculated for each site and represents the maximum amount of vehicles stacked behind the car wash tunnel 95 percent of the time or less. The 95th percentile is typically considered the design queue for which the site should be designed to accommodate traffic. The average vehicle length, including headway, is considered 20 feet for queuing analysis purposes. The proposed site plan provides approximately 120 feet of double lane storage within the ingress drive aisle, from the pay station to the edge of the property line. An additional 47 Apx - 233 6-3 feet of single-lane storage space is provided from the pay stations to the car wash tunnel entrance. The total amount of space for on-site vehicle queuing upon entry is approximately 14 vehicles as shown in the project site plan on Exhibit 1-2; providing enough space for approximately 14 vehicles to wait in line for the car wash tunnel before backing up onto State College Boulevard. Based on the results of the observed queuing surveys, adequate storage space is expected to be provided to accommodate the average observed 95th percentile queue. Even under worst-case observed conditions, the project would be able to accommodate the maximum observed queue of 14 vehicles. Since the project inbound driveway serves as the west leg of the State College Boulevard / Underhill Avenue intersection, it is critical that the vehicles do not queue onto State College Boulevard. The vehicle queues should be monitored during car wash operations to ensure the vehicles do not queue onto State College Boulevard. In the event the queue is reaching State College Boulevard, the site operator should make necessary arrangements to stop accepting additional vehicles until the queue can be maintained at a maximum length of 14 vehicles without encroaching onto State College Boulevard. Apx - 234 In Out Total In Out Total Scrub Bot Express Car Wash (1807 Main Street)12 10 22 36 55 91 745 Zaroo Express Car Wash (1205 W. 17th Street )15 13 28 43 37 80 644 Santa Ana Express Car Wash (202 E. First Street)49 49 98 85 70 155 1,344 Average 25 24 49 55 54 109 911 Scrub Bot Express Car Wash (1807 Main Street)996 Zaroo Express Car Wash (1205 W. 17th Street )1,196 Santa Ana Express Car Wash (202 E. First Street)2,460 Average 1,551 64 118 83 In Out Total 229 166 2 Saturday observed traffic counts conducted on Saturday, March 16, 2019. 69 69 111 83 TABLE 4-1 Observed Car Wash Sites Trip Generation Observed Car Wash Location PM Weekday Daily Saturday Conditions2 Weekday Conditions1 68 133 137 1 Weekday observed traffic counts conducted on Thursday, March 14, 2019. AM Weekday Peak Hour Observed Car Wash Location Saturday Daily Saturday Peak Hour AT:sl/RK15422TB JN:2837-2019-01 Apx - 235 In Out Total In Out Total Weekday Trip Generation 25 24 49 55 54 109 911 Saturday Trip Generation 1,551 1 Source: Trip generation data based on observed traffic surveys conducted by RK Engineering Group, March 2019. 83 83 166 Saturday Conditions1 Project Trip Generation Saturday Peak Hour Saturday Daily In Out Total TABLE 4-2 Project Trip Generation Weekday Conditions1 Project Trip Generation Weekday Peak Hour Weekday DailyAMPM AT:sl/RK15422TB JN:2837-2019-01 Apx - 236 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, California 92705 | (714) 795-3100 | www.ganddini.com ORANGE COUNTY RIVERSIDE PALO ALTO June 11, 2019 Mr. Dennis Lee LEEDCO ENGINEERS, INC. 3870 Baldwin Avenue El Monte, CA 91731 RE: Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Study 01-7520 Mr. Dennis Lee: INTRODUCTION Ganddini Group, Inc. is pleased to provide this drive-through queuing and parking study for the proposed Oasis Car Wash project located at 387 North Tustin Street in the City of Orange. City staff has requested an analysis of the drive-through lane queuing length and parking demand based on observations at similar car wash facilities. The estimated peak queuing length and parking demand for the proposed project is formulated based on the highest hourly 85th-percentile queue length and parking demand observed at the similar car wash facilities. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at 387 North Tustin Street in the City of Orange. The project location map is shown on Figure 1. The site is currently occupied by an existing car wash. The project proposes to update the existing “old- fashion” style car wash facility to a modern car wash facility that is equipped with automatic pay stations and a vehicle drying area with vacuum posts. The proposed drive-through lane configuration provides queuing storage for approximately 23 vehicles from the two pay stations to the car wash tunnel entrance. There will be a drying area with 37 parking stalls that are equipped with vacuum posts for vehicle interior cleaning and drying the vehicle exterior after the vehicles have traveled through the wash tunnel, and another 7 standard parking stalls. The project is proposed to have one car wash tunnel that could accommodate approximately 5 vehicles through different stages of the car wash. The car wash is proposed to operate 7 days per week from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. There will be approximately 3 on-site employees. The site plan is illustrated on Figure 2. Appendix A also contains the project site plan. Since the proposed changes will substantially alter project site operations, the City has requested an analysis of the drive-through lane queuing lane demand and parking demand based on observations of other similar car wash facilities with similar modern amenities. CITY PARKING CODE REQUIREMENTS The City of Orange Municipal Code (OMC) Table 17.34.060.B lists several types of car wash facilities, and each type with a different parking requirements. The proposed project is for an automatic, but self-service Apx - 237 Mr. Dennis Lee LEEDCO ENGINEERS, INC. June 11, 2019 Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Study 01-7520 operated car wash facility with minimal on-site employees. The proposed project operational characteristics are different from the list of car wash facilities identified on the OMC; therefore, the City has requested an analysis of the parking demand based on observations of other similar car wash facilities with similar modern amenities. For informational purposes, Table 1 shows the required number of parking spaces calculated for the proposed project based on the following two types of car wash facilities listed in the OMC that have some similarities to, but also some differences from, the proposed project: • Type C Car Wash Facility, Automatic and Full Service (including hand dry) – 1 space per employee for employee parking, and 5 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for dry off area (spaces may be located in open pavement area as long as on-site circulation is not blocked). Auxiliary uses (i.e., office, retail) calculated separately. • Type D Car Wash Facility, Hand Wash and Hand Dry – 2 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for employee parking plus 5 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for dry off area (spaces may be located in open pavement area as long as on-site circulation is not blocked). Auxiliary uses (i.e., office, retail) calculated separately. As shown in Table 1, Type C car wash facility (automatic and full service including hand dry) requires 32 parking spaces, and Type D car wash facility (hand wash and hand dry) requires 39 parking spaces based on City Municipal Code requirements. Since the proposed project provides a drying area with a total of 44 parking spaces (37 vacuum station stalls and 7 standard parking stalls), more than adequate parking supply is forecast to be provided with a surplus of five (5) parking spaces based on the City Municipal Code requirements. OMC Section 17.34.080 Parking Requirements for Bicycle and Motorcycles indicates that 50 square feet of motorcycle parking and one (1) bicycle rack (with locking capabilities for 5 bicycles) is required for the project. SIMILAR CAR WASH SITE OBSERVATIONS AND COUNTS This analysis estimates the drive-through lane queuing demand and parking demand for the proposed project based on observations at three existing similar car wash facilities. These three similar car wash facilities were chosen as survey sites because they are comparable to the proposed project site in terms of the size, site configuration, typical operations, and available amenities. Field observations of drive-through lane queues and parking demand were conducted at the following three existing car wash facility locations: 1. Rapids Express Carwash – 2045 North Tustin Street, Orange CA; 2. Scrub Bot Express Car Wash – 1807 North Main Street, Santa Ana, CA; and 3. Speedie Clean Express Car Wash – 2035 North Tustin Avenue, Santa Ana, CA. The drive-through vehicular queues and number of parked vehicles were observed in 15-minute intervals from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM during a typical weekday (Tuesday, July 10, 2018) and a typical Saturday (July 14, 2018). The observations were conducted using field surveys with technicians on-site. ESTIMATED QUEUE LENGTH AND PARKING DEMAND Table 2 and Table 3 summarize the results of the observed drive-through lane vehicular queue and parking demand data collected at the three similar car wash facility locations during a typical Tuesday and a typical Saturday, respectively. The drive-through queue length and parking demand summary in Table 2 and Table 3 present the observed average, 85th-percentile, and peak queue length and parking demand. Apx - 238 Mr. Dennis Lee LEEDCO ENGINEERS, INC. June 11, 2019 Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Study 01-7520 As shown in Table 2, the peak activity at each similar car wash facility were observed to occur intermittently during the late morning time period that coincided with the beginning of a typical work day and the afternoon peak period that coincided with the end of a typical work day. The queuing length and parking demand receded during less active times throughout the day. The peak queue length and parking demand within each 15- minute interval were observed to be sustained for only a few minutes at a time. As shown in Table 2, the Tuesday maximum peak vehicular queue length observed was 18 vehicles at the Rapids Express site, three (3) vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and nine (9) vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average queue for the Tuesday counts for the three survey sites is 7.0 vehicles during the evening peak period. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile queue is 13.2 vehicles during the evening peak period. Figure 3 shows graphical results of the Tuesday average queue, the 85th-percentile queue, and the peak queue for each time period throughout the day. As shown in Table 2, the Tuesday maximum peak parking demand observed was 20 parked vehicles at the Rapids Express site, 13 parked vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and 17 parked vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average parking demand for the Tuesday counts for the three survey sites is 14.3 parked vehicles throughout various times of the day. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile parking demand is 19.1 parked vehicles during the morning peak period. Figure 4 shows graphical results of the Tuesday average parking demand, the 85th-percentile parking demand, and the peak parking demand for each time period throughout the day. As shown in Table 3, the Saturday maximum peak vehicular queue length observed was 22 vehicles at the Rapids Express site, five (5) vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and eight (8) vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average queue for the Saturday counts for the three survey sites is 11.0 vehicles during the afternoon peak period. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile queue is 17.8 vehicles during the afternoon peak period. Figure 5 shows graphical results of the Saturday average queue, the 85th- percentile queue, and the peak queue for each time period throughout the day. As shown in Table 3, the Saturday maximum peak parking demand observed was 18 parked vehicles at the Rapids Express site, 21 parked vehicles at the Scrub Bots Express site, and 21 parked vehicles at the Speedie Clean Express site. The maximum hourly average parking demand for the Saturday counts for the three survey sites is 18.0 parked vehicles throughout various times during the mid-day peak period. The maximum hourly 85th-percentile parking demand is 20.4 parked vehicles during the morning peak period. Figure 6 shows graphical results of the Saturday average parking demand, the 85th-percentile parking demand, and the peak parking demand for each time period throughout the day. The parking count data combined vehicles parked in vacuum station stalls and regular parking stalls. The field observation shows that some vehicles occupying the vacuum station stalls are not vacuuming but are either drying the vehicles or utilizing other amenities in the facility. Therefore, the overall parking demand includes all users of the car wash facility. PROJECTED QUEUE LANE AND PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT Assuming the proposed Oasis Car Wash project would experience queuing activity similar to the three survey sites, the typical peak queuing length is estimated to be approximately 18 vehicles from the pay station during peak periods based on the highest 85th-percentile queue length. Since the proposed project provides a vehicular queue storage capacity for approximately 18 vehicles, the drive-through storage capacity is forecast to be adequate. Apx - 239 Apx - 240 Apx - 241 Apx - 242 Proposed Use Component Quantity1 Units2 Parking Spaces Type C Car Wash Facility Automatic & Full Service Employee (6 Spaces)3 EMP 1.0 Space : 1 EMP 3 (including hand dry)3 Wash Tunnel Capacity - Customer Drying 5 Cars 5.0 Space : 1 Cars 25 Auxiliary Use 988 SF 4.0 Space : 1,000 SF 4 32 Type D Car Wash Facility Hand Wash & Hand Dry4 Wash Tunnel Capacity - Employee Drying 5 Cars 2.0 Space : 1 Cars 10 Wash Tunnel Capacity - Customer Drying 5 Cars 5.0 Space : 1 Cars 25 Auxiliary Use 988 SF 4.0 Space : 1,000 SF 4 39 44 +5 (1) (2) (3) (4)City of Orange Municipal Code, Table 17.34.060.B, Type D, Hand Wash & Hand Dry - 2 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for employee parking plus 5 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for dry off area (spaces may be located in open pavement area as long as on-site circulation is not blocked). Auxiliary uses (i.e., office, retail) calculated separately. Total Parking Notes: The car wash tunnel is assumed to be able to fit 5 cars being washed at various stage of the wash cycle. The interior building area (minus the car wash tunnel) is approximately 988 square feet for the auxiliary uses. The number of employees is assumed to be 3 employees. SF = Square Feet; EMP = Employees City of Orange Municipal Code, Table 17.34.060.B, Type C, Automatic & Full Service (including hand dry) - 1 space per employee for employee parking, and 5 spaces per car length of internal car wash tunnel capacity for dry off area (spaces may be located in open pavement area as long as on-site circulation is not blocked). Auxiliary uses (i.e., office, retail) calculated separately. Available Parking Supply, including 37 vacumm station stalls and 7 standard car parking stalls [See Figure 2] Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Project C Total Parking D Table 1 Parking Requirement Based on City of Orange Municipal Code Type Parking Code Requirement Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 243 Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking 7:00 AM -7:15 AM 2 3 0 1 1 2 2 3 1.0 2.0 1.7 2.7 7:15 AM -7:30 AM 3 3 2 1 2 8 3 8 2.3 4.0 2.7 6.5 7:30 AM -7:45 AM 0 5 1 3 4 5 4 5 1.7 4.3 3.1 5.0 7:45 AM -8:00 AM 0 3 2 3 2 5 2 5 1.3 3.7 2.0 4.4 8:00 AM -8:15 AM 1 4 1 7 2 3 2 7 1.3 4.7 1.7 6.1 8:15 AM -8:30 AM 0 9 0 5 3 7 3 9 1.0 7.0 2.1 8.4 8:30 AM -8:45 AM 1 5 0 6 4 11 4 11 1.7 7.3 3.1 9.5 8:45 AM -9:00 AM 1 13 0 2 5 11 5 13 2.0 8.7 3.8 12.4 9:00 AM -9:15 AM 3 12 1 4 8 10 8 12 4.0 8.7 6.5 11.4 9:15 AM -9:30 AM 2 20 0 6 4 17 4 20 *2.0 14.3 *3.4 19.1 * 9:30 AM -9:45 AM 0 11 1 3 4 11 4 11 1.7 8.3 3.1 11.0 9:45 AM -10:00 AM 1 15 1 5 3 9 3 15 1.7 9.7 2.4 13.2 10:00 AM -10:15 AM 0 19 0 4 4 11 4 19 1.3 11.3 2.8 16.6 10:15 AM -10:30 AM 0 14 0 1 7 13 7 14 2.3 9.3 4.9 13.7 10:30 AM -10:45 AM 1 15 1 5 5 14 5 15 2.3 11.3 3.8 14.7 10:45 AM -11:00 AM 1 12 1 9 9 8 9 12 3.7 9.7 6.6 11.1 11:00 AM -11:15 AM 1 11 0 9 5 9 5 11 2.0 9.7 3.8 10.4 11:15 AM -11:30 AM 2 12 2 8 7 7 7 12 3.7 9.0 5.5 10.8 11:30 AM -11:45 AM 0 14 1 4 5 13 5 14 2.0 10.3 3.8 13.7 11:45 AM -12:00 PM 1 14 2 5 6 12 6 14 3.0 10.3 4.8 13.4 12:00 PM -12:15 PM 1 11 1 7 8 14 8 14 3.3 10.7 5.9 13.1 12:15 PM -12:30 PM 0 12 3 8 4 13 4 13 2.3 11.0 3.7 12.7 12:30 PM -12:45 PM 2 10 0 8 4 13 4 13 2.0 10.3 3.4 12.1 12:45 PM -1:00 PM 0 11 1 8 7 8 7 11 2.7 9.0 5.2 10.1 1:00 PM -1:15 PM 2 10 3 9 4 8 4 10 3.0 9.0 3.7 9.7 1:15 PM -1:30 PM 1 12 0 9 5 11 5 12 2.0 10.7 3.8 11.7 1:30 PM -1:45 PM 5 14 1 8 1 15 5 15 2.3 12.3 3.8 14.7 1:45 PM -2:00 PM 4 14 0 7 6 12 6 14 3.3 11.0 5.4 13.4 2:00 PM -2:15 PM 6 17 1 7 1 13 6 17 2.7 12.3 4.5 15.8 2:15 PM -2:30 PM 3 15 1 8 4 12 4 15 2.7 11.7 3.7 14.1 2:30 PM -2:45 PM 5 16 0 10 1 17 5 17 2.0 14.3 *3.8 16.7 2:45 PM -3:00 PM 7 12 0 11 1 14 7 14 2.7 12.3 5.2 13.4 3:00 PM -3:15 PM 3 16 0 9 2 6 3 16 1.7 10.3 2.7 13.9 3:15 PM -3:30 PM 4 15 1 8 3 14 4 15 2.7 12.3 3.7 14.7 3:30 PM -3:45 PM 2 19 1 7 1 17 2 19 1.3 14.3 *1.7 18.4 3:45 PM -4:00 PM 2 15 0 7 5 13 5 15 2.3 11.7 4.1 14.4 4:00 PM -4:15 PM 3 15 0 1 7 7 7 15 3.3 7.7 5.8 12.6 4:15 PM -4:30 PM 6 12 2 4 4 13 6 13 4.0 9.7 5.4 12.7 4:30 PM -4:45 PM 5 13 1 4 1 11 5 13 2.3 9.3 3.8 12.4 4:45 PM -5:00 PM 4 14 0 5 3 13 4 14 2.3 10.7 3.7 13.7 5:00 PM -5:15 PM 6 9 0 3 3 10 6 10 3.0 7.3 5.1 9.7 5:15 PM -5:30 PM 3 16 2 4 2 8 3 16 2.3 9.3 2.7 13.6 5:30 PM -5:45 PM 6 14 0 7 4 8 6 14 3.3 9.7 5.4 12.2 5:45 PM -6:00 PM 3 15 3 7 1 8 3 15 2.3 10.0 3.0 12.9 6:00 PM -6:15 PM 5 17 0 13 2 13 5 17 2.3 14.3 *4.1 15.8 6:15 PM -6:30 PM 4 9 0 9 0 12 4 12 1.3 10.0 2.8 11.1 6:30 PM -6:45 PM 5 11 1 9 5 9 5 11 3.7 9.7 5.0 10.4 6:45 PM -7:00 PM 3 14 1 11 2 13 3 14 2.0 12.7 2.7 13.7 7:00 PM -7:15 PM 1 17 0 11 0 8 1 17 0.3 12.0 0.7 15.2 7:15 PM -7:30 PM 4 12 0 12 1 9 4 12 1.7 11.0 3.1 12.0 7:30 PM -7:45 PM 1 14 0 12 1 12 1 14 0.7 12.7 1.0 13.4 7:45 PM - 8:00 PM 18 4 1 11 2 9 18 *11 7.0 *8.0 13.2 *10.4 18 20 3 13 9 17 2.8 12.3 0.8 6.6 3.6 10.6 5.0 16.0 2.0 9.4 6.0 13.4 Site 85th Percentile Time Period Rapids Express Scrub Bot Express Speedie Clean Express Site Average Site Peak Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Parking Summary of Tuesday Queuing Length and Parking Demand Observation (July 10, 2018) Table 2 Hourly Average Queue Parking Hourly Peak Queue Parking Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 244 Figure 3 0 5 10 15 20 25 7: 0 0 A M 7: 1 5 A M 7: 3 0 A M 7: 4 5 A M 8: 0 0 A M 8: 1 5 A M 8: 3 0 A M 8: 4 5 A M 9: 0 0 A M 9: 1 5 A M 9: 3 0 A M 9: 4 5 A M 10 : 0 0 A M 10 : 1 5 A M 10 : 3 0 A M 10 : 4 5 A M 11 : 0 0 A M 11 : 1 5 A M 11 : 3 0 A M 11 : 4 5 A M 12 : 0 0 P M 12 : 1 5 P M 12 : 3 0 P M 12 : 4 5 P M 1: 0 0 P M 1: 1 5 P M 1: 3 0 P M 1: 4 5 P M 2: 0 0 P M 2: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M 3: 0 0 P M 3: 1 5 P M 3: 3 0 P M 3: 4 5 P M 4: 0 0 P M 4: 1 5 P M 4: 3 0 P M 4: 4 5 P M 5: 0 0 P M 5: 1 5 P M 5: 3 0 P M 5: 4 5 P M 6: 0 0 P M 6: 1 5 P M 6: 3 0 P M 6: 4 5 P M 7: 0 0 P M 7: 1 5 P M 7: 3 0 P M 7: 4 5 P M Nu m b e r o f P a r k e d V e h i c l e s Time of the Day Tuesday Hourly Parking Demand Observation Rapids Express Parking Scrub Bot Express Parking Speedie Clean Express Parking Hourly Average Parking Hourly 85th Percentile Parking Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 245 Figure 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 7: 0 0 A M 7: 1 5 A M 7: 3 0 A M 7: 4 5 A M 8: 0 0 A M 8: 1 5 A M 8: 3 0 A M 8: 4 5 A M 9: 0 0 A M 9: 1 5 A M 9: 3 0 A M 9: 4 5 A M 10 : 0 0 A M 10 : 1 5 A M 10 : 3 0 A M 10 : 4 5 A M 11 : 0 0 A M 11 : 1 5 A M 11 : 3 0 A M 11 : 4 5 A M 12 : 0 0 P M 12 : 1 5 P M 12 : 3 0 P M 12 : 4 5 P M 1: 0 0 P M 1: 1 5 P M 1: 3 0 P M 1: 4 5 P M 2: 0 0 P M 2: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M 3: 0 0 P M 3: 1 5 P M 3: 3 0 P M 3: 4 5 P M 4: 0 0 P M 4: 1 5 P M 4: 3 0 P M 4: 4 5 P M 5: 0 0 P M 5: 1 5 P M 5: 3 0 P M 5: 4 5 P M 6: 0 0 P M 6: 1 5 P M 6: 3 0 P M 6: 4 5 P M 7: 0 0 P M 7: 1 5 P M 7: 3 0 P M 7: 4 5 P M Nu m b e r o f Q u e u i n g V e h i c l e s Time of the Day Tuesday Hourly Queue Length Observation Rapids Express Queue Scrub Bot Express Queue Speedie Clean Express Queue Hourly Average Queue Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 246 Queue Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking 7:00 AM -7:15 AM 2 7 0 6 3 5 3 7 1.7 6.0 2.7 6.7 7:15 AM -7:30 AM 5 11 1 10 2 13 5 13 2.7 11.3 4.1 12.4 7:30 AM -7:45 AM 3 12 0 12 3 11 3 12 2.0 11.7 3.0 12.0 7:45 AM -8:00 AM 2 11 0 10 1 12 2 12 1.0 11.0 1.7 11.7 8:00 AM -8:15 AM 5 15 2 8 0 10 5 15 2.3 11.0 4.1 13.5 8:15 AM -8:30 AM 4 14 0 10 2 14 4 14 2.0 12.7 3.4 14.0 8:30 AM -8:45 AM 6 15 0 10 6 15 6 15 4.0 13.3 6.0 15.0 8:45 AM -9:00 AM 3 17 0 6 2 18 3 18 1.7 13.7 2.7 17.7 9:00 AM -9:15 AM 6 18 1 10 1 13 6 18 2.7 13.7 4.5 16.5 9:15 AM -9:30 AM 4 16 1 11 3 14 4 16 2.7 13.7 3.7 15.4 9:30 AM -9:45 AM 4 17 1 10 0 14 4 17 1.7 13.7 3.1 16.1 9:45 AM -10:00 AM 6 16 3 14 4 15 6 16 4.3 15.0 5.4 15.7 10:00 AM -10:15 AM 5 14 3 21 3 19 5 21 *3.7 18.0 *4.4 20.4 * 10:15 AM -10:30 AM 4 16 0 11 1 16 4 16 1.7 14.3 3.1 16.0 10:30 AM -10:45 AM 5 18 1 12 4 19 5 19 3.3 16.3 4.7 18.7 10:45 AM -11:00 AM 9 17 2 15 2 15 9 17 4.3 15.7 6.9 16.4 11:00 AM -11:15 AM 9 18 4 15 4 16 9 18 5.7 16.3 7.5 17.4 11:15 AM -11:30 AM 9 14 3 15 4 17 9 17 5.3 15.3 7.5 16.4 11:30 AM -11:45 AM 11 15 5 18 7 21 11 21 *7.7 18.0 *9.8 20.1 11:45 AM -12:00 PM 9 16 3 19 6 14 9 19 6.0 16.3 8.1 18.1 12:00 PM -12:15 PM 14 17 1 20 4 15 14 20 6.3 17.3 11.0 19.1 12:15 PM -12:30 PM 10 15 0 18 5 15 10 18 5.0 16.0 8.5 17.1 12:30 PM -12:45 PM 6 16 1 9 6 21 6 21 *4.3 15.3 6.0 19.5 12:45 PM -1:00 PM 15 15 2 12 5 18 15 18 7.3 15.0 12.0 17.1 1:00 PM -1:15 PM 14 18 5 13 6 19 14 19 8.3 16.7 11.6 18.7 1:15 PM -1:30 PM 14 18 4 15 7 20 14 20 8.3 17.7 11.9 19.4 1:30 PM -1:45 PM 22 4 3 16 8 21 22 *21 *11.0 *13.7 17.8 *19.5 1:45 PM -2:00 PM 21 4 0 15 4 16 21 16 8.3 11.7 15.9 15.7 2:00 PM -2:15 PM 19 7 2 13 0 20 19 20 7.0 13.3 13.9 17.9 2:15 PM -2:30 PM 14 3 0 15 2 15 14 15 5.3 11.0 10.4 15.0 2:30 PM -2:45 PM 17 5 0 14 4 13 17 14 7.0 10.7 13.1 13.7 2:45 PM -3:00 PM 18 4 2 12 1 15 18 15 7.0 10.3 13.2 14.1 3:00 PM -3:15 PM 18 2 1 14 5 21 18 21 *8.0 12.3 14.1 18.9 3:15 PM -3:30 PM 20 5 0 13 3 19 20 19 7.7 12.3 14.9 17.2 3:30 PM -3:45 PM 17 3 0 13 3 16 17 16 6.7 10.7 12.8 15.1 3:45 PM -4:00 PM 22 6 3 12 7 17 22 *17 10.7 11.7 17.5 15.5 4:00 PM -4:15 PM 19 2 2 12 0 14 19 14 7.0 9.3 13.9 13.4 4:15 PM -4:30 PM 17 0 4 13 5 20 17 20 8.7 11.0 13.4 17.9 4:30 PM -4:45 PM 18 1 1 16 3 15 18 16 7.3 10.7 13.5 15.7 4:45 PM -5:00 PM 16 3 1 16 5 9 16 16 7.3 9.3 12.7 13.9 5:00 PM -5:15 PM 13 2 2 12 2 11 13 12 5.7 8.3 9.7 11.7 5:15 PM -5:30 PM 13 1 1 15 1 11 13 15 5.0 9.0 9.4 13.8 5:30 PM -5:45 PM 12 0 0 13 1 15 12 15 4.3 9.3 8.7 14.4 5:45 PM -6:00 PM 12 2 2 14 5 16 12 16 6.3 10.7 9.9 15.4 6:00 PM -6:15 PM 10 0 3 13 3 19 10 19 5.3 10.7 7.9 17.2 6:15 PM -6:30 PM 9 0 2 14 3 17 9 17 4.7 10.3 7.2 16.1 6:30 PM -6:45 PM 9 0 3 13 2 11 9 13 4.7 8.0 7.2 12.4 6:45 PM -7:00 PM 8 0 0 10 1 9 8 10 3.0 6.3 5.9 9.7 7:00 PM -7:15 PM 7 0 0 12 1 7 7 12 2.7 6.3 5.2 10.5 7:15 PM -7:30 PM 8 0 0 8 2 10 8 10 3.3 6.0 6.2 9.4 7:30 PM -7:45 PM 6 0 1 8 4 11 6 11 3.7 6.3 5.4 10.1 7:45 PM - 8:00 PM 6 0 0 13 2 12 6 13 2.7 8.3 4.8 12.7 22 18 5 21 8 21 10.7 8.7 1.5 12.9 3.2 15.0 18.0 17.0 3.0 15.4 5.4 19.0 Table 3 Summary of Saturday Queuing Length and Parking Demand Observation (July 14, 2018) Time Period Rapids Express Scrub Bot Express Speedie Clean Express Hourly Peak Hourly Average Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Site Average Site 85th Percentile Parking Queue Parking Queue Parking Site Peak Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 247 Figure 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 7: 0 0 A M 7: 1 5 A M 7: 3 0 A M 7: 4 5 A M 8: 0 0 A M 8: 1 5 A M 8: 3 0 A M 8: 4 5 A M 9: 0 0 A M 9: 1 5 A M 9: 3 0 A M 9: 4 5 A M 10 : 0 0 A M 10 : 1 5 A M 10 : 3 0 A M 10 : 4 5 A M 11 : 0 0 A M 11 : 1 5 A M 11 : 3 0 A M 11 : 4 5 A M 12 : 0 0 P M 12 : 1 5 P M 12 : 3 0 P M 12 : 4 5 P M 1: 0 0 P M 1: 1 5 P M 1: 3 0 P M 1: 4 5 P M 2: 0 0 P M 2: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M 3: 0 0 P M 3: 1 5 P M 3: 3 0 P M 3: 4 5 P M 4: 0 0 P M 4: 1 5 P M 4: 3 0 P M 4: 4 5 P M 5: 0 0 P M 5: 1 5 P M 5: 3 0 P M 5: 4 5 P M 6: 0 0 P M 6: 1 5 P M 6: 3 0 P M 6: 4 5 P M 7: 0 0 P M 7: 1 5 P M 7: 3 0 P M 7: 4 5 P M Nu m b e r o f P a r k e d V e h i c l e s Time of the Day Saturday Hourly Parking Demand Observation Rapids Express Parking Scrub Bot Express Parking Speedie Clean Express Parking Hourly Average Parking Hourly 85th Percentile Parking Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 248 Figure 6 0 5 10 15 20 25 7: 0 0 A M 7: 1 5 A M 7: 3 0 A M 7: 4 5 A M 8: 0 0 A M 8: 1 5 A M 8: 3 0 A M 8: 4 5 A M 9: 0 0 A M 9: 1 5 A M 9: 3 0 A M 9: 4 5 A M 10 : 0 0 A M 10 : 1 5 A M 10 : 3 0 A M 10 : 4 5 A M 11 : 0 0 A M 11 : 1 5 A M 11 : 3 0 A M 11 : 4 5 A M 12 : 0 0 P M 12 : 1 5 P M 12 : 3 0 P M 12 : 4 5 P M 1: 0 0 P M 1: 1 5 P M 1: 3 0 P M 1: 4 5 P M 2: 0 0 P M 2: 1 5 P M 2: 3 0 P M 2: 4 5 P M 3: 0 0 P M 3: 1 5 P M 3: 3 0 P M 3: 4 5 P M 4: 0 0 P M 4: 1 5 P M 4: 3 0 P M 4: 4 5 P M 5: 0 0 P M 5: 1 5 P M 5: 3 0 P M 5: 4 5 P M 6: 0 0 P M 6: 1 5 P M 6: 3 0 P M 6: 4 5 P M 7: 0 0 P M 7: 1 5 P M 7: 3 0 P M 7: 4 5 P M Nu m b e r o f Q u e u i n g V e h i c l e s Time of the Day Saturday Hourly Queue Length Observation Rapids Express Queue Scrub Bot Express Queue Speedie Clean Express Queue Hourly Average Queue Hourly 85th Percentile Queue Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 249 21 6 27 44 +17 (1) Notes: The updated floor plan shows approximately 1,464 square feet of gross floor area, minus the car wash tunnel. The auxiliary use of 1,464 square feet x 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet (office use) would be 6 required spaces, as requested by the Ctiy. Parking Supply Adequacy Assessment Based on Estimated Parking Demand Table 4 Parking Analysis Components Estimated Peak Project Parking Demand - Estimate Based on Traffic Counts at Comparable Car Wash Facilities with Similar Operational Characteristics [See Tables 2 and 3] Parking Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) for the Proposed Oasis Car Wash Project Parking Spaces Additional Parking Supply Requested by the City for Auxiliary Uses1 Available Parking Supply Provided by the Proposed Oasis Car Wash Project, including 37 vacumm station stalls and 7 standard car parking stalls [See Figure 2] Total Number of Parking Spaces Required for the Proposed Oasis Car Wash Project Oasis Car Wash Queuing and Parking Analysis 01-7520Apx - 250 APPENDIX A SITE PLAN Apx - 251 EXIT ONLY LOADING 01 2#4-+0)EXIT ONLY LOADING S H E E T T I T L E P R O J E C T T I T L E NO.DATE DESCRIPTION P R O J E C T N U M B E R S Y N A R C S T U D I O E X P R E S S L Y R E S E R V E S I T S C O M M O N L A W C O P Y R I G H T A N D O T H E R P R O P E R T Y R I G H T S I N T H E S E D O C U M E N T S . T H E S E D O C U M E N T S A R E N O T T O B E R E P R O D U C E D , C H A N G E D , O R C O P I E D I N A N Y F O R M O R M A N N E R W H A T S O E V E R . N O R A R E T H E Y T O B E A S S I G N E D T O A N Y T H I R D P A R T Y W I T H O U T F I R S T O B T A I N I N G T H E E X P R E S S E D W R I T T E N P E R M I S S I O N A N D C O N S E N T O F S Y N A R C S T U D I O . 2 4 0 0 m a i n s t . s u i t e 2 0 3 . i r v i n e . c a . 9 2 6 1 4 o . 9 4 9 - 5 9 6 - 7 3 6 2 O R A N G E E X P R E S S C A R W A S H 3 8 7 N . T U S T I N S T . O R A N G E , C A 9 2 8 6 7 N A p x - 2 5 2 GANDDINI GROUP, INC. 550 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 202, Santa Ana, CA 92705 714.795.3100 | www.ganddini.com Presented by: Anaheim Care, LLC Shira Zaghi ShiraZaghi@Gmail.com 310-266-0325 Property: NEC of Ball Road and Sunkist Avenue Current Property Description: The subject property is located at the Northeast corner of Ball and Sunkist and is situated on approximately 82,000 square feet with a 17,000 square foot structure broken into multiple shop-space tenants. Executive Plan: We intend to demolish the entire structure and create two users on the site which will better utilize the square footage. This plan will provide greater community uses benefitting nearby residents and commuters. A 24-hour operating convenient store will be built on at the corner. Alongside, a drive-through automated car wash will be available for about 11 hours daily. The convenient store will constantly supply 2-4 working employees while the carwash will have 3-5 people working during business hours. The convenience store will occupy 3,062 square feet of building while the car wash will run a 4,000 square foot tunnel. The convenient store will complement a gas station at the hard corner of Ball and Sunkist. With 6 MPDs (containing 12 individual gas pumps), the site will provide an exceptional and time-efficient option for customers with limited traffic to attain a spot at a pump. Off the 57 freeway, a passersby will also find easy access to refuel. The automated car wash on the eastern portion of the site will supply about 17 vacuums. The gas station operator that we intend to bring will build a top-of-the-line gas station with construction costs exceeding $5,000,000 to ensure they can deliver a product allowing the city of Anaheim to thrive. As inherited from the ATTACHMENT NO. 9 previous owners, is substandard and blighted and an eyesore for the community and surrounding neighborhoods. The new development will be clean, modern, state of the art, and maintained and operated to the highest standards. Problems and Solutions: 1. One significant challenge this site encountered was widening of the street per code to 11 ft. from Ball Rd and 4 ft. from Sunkist Ave. Initially we requested multiple variances but we were able to accomplish our layout without a single variance . Instead, the users were instructed to shrink their footprint. 2. Understandably, the City is concerned about the noise created by the carwash. To alleviate this concern, we will build the tunne l in the center of the site at the direction of our noise consultant, Veneklasen and Associates. Even more, we are designing an additional sound mitigating 8 foot wall with expansive landscaping to maintain the neighborhood’s right of quiet enjoyment. Moreover, we are moving the vacuum room inside the tunnel to block the noise. Our blowers which dries the car will have mufflers to quiet the sound. Blowers will be in the middle of the tunnel so the noise does not impact the neighbors. With all these sound mitigation efforts, the neighborhood will enjoy the calm of pre-construction noise levels. Conclusion: In allowing Anaheim Care to build this efficient center, Anaheim will create a useful and beautiful concept at the hard corner of Ball and Sunkist benefitting the neighborhood and city. LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION/ EXPLANATION PROPOSED USE The proposed use is for a new state-of-the-art express exterior car wash located at 2507 East Ball Road, Anaheim. WHAT IS AN EXPRESS EXTERIOR WASH? An express exterior wash is a relatively new type of wash and the fastest growing segment of the car wash industry. Customers stay in their vehicles for the entire wash and their cars are washed and dried by modern wash equipment. The process starts with the customer entering the site and driving up to either an automated pay lane or an attended pay lane. After paying, they enter the wash where a belt transporter carries the vehicle through the tunnel. The vehicle is completely washed and dried inside the tunnel by automated driers before the customer exits. During this process, no employee ever enters a customer vehicle or touches any car. As the customer exits the tunnel, they have the option of leaving the property or using a number of free vacuum stalls. WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF AN EXPRESS WASH? The benefits of an express wash are that they are FAST, FUN, ECONOMICAL and ECO-FRIENDLY. A customer can get their car washed at an express wash in about 5 minutes compared to thirty minutes or more at a conventional full service car wash. The experience of staying in your vehicle and riding through the automated tunnel is fun for the whole family. Additionally, express washes are very economical versus conventional washes. Wash packages range in price from only $5 - $14. Finally, express washes are eco-friendly because we save water through the use of a water reclamation system and we use only non-toxic, biodegradable soaps. SITE SPECIFIC DETAILS: •There are two (2) pay lanes that accept cash, credit or debit card. One lane is attended by a cashier, and the other lane is automated with a pay station; •Customers can purchase a single wash, or join our unlimited wash club. Our wash club allows customers to use the wash as often as they like for one low monthly price (starting at $14.95/mth). This provides an economical way for patrons to wash regularly. •A 140’ modern wash tunnel with high-end stainless steel wash equipment; ATTACHMENT NO. 10 • 18 free vacuum stalls (included with a paid wash) plus 4 employee parking stalls; • A state-of-the-art water reclamation system; • Sound barrier wall as you leave tunnel exit to reduce sound transmission; • An office area and storage area; • One (1) restroom inside office; • Vending area for car wash supplies (towels, air fresheners, etc…); WHY SHOULD THE CITY APPROVE THIS PROJECT? There are several reasons why the City of Anaheim should approve this project. 1. Location: This project is located immediately off of the 57 Freeway. Therefore, it is the natural and logical use for a location abutting a freeway. Cars exiting the freeway can easily turn into the property and get their car washed quickly, before continuing down Ball road. Also, there are no other express washes currently or planned within 1.5 miles of this location and none along this traffic pattern. Thus, this project will positively serve the community and its residents. 2. Popular New Type of Car Wash: Express exterior car washes are becoming very popular and residents love them. Express washes are the fastest growing segment of the car wash industry. The local community appreciates express exterior car washes because they are fast, fun, safe and economical. Compared to traditional washes where you can wait up to 30 minutes, a customer can be in-and-out within 5 minutes. Customers enjoy staying in their car throughout the wash process because it is a fun experience, and it eliminates having strangers in their car near their personal valuables. Finally, express exterior washes are very economical (only $5-$14) depending on the wash package. 3. Environmentally and Water Friendly: Rapids Express is equipped with a state-of-the-art water reclamation system and high tech computers that measure the vehicle so that we don’t waste water unneccessarily. When residents wash their own car at home in the driveway, they use significantly more water and the dirt and oils from their wheels, etc., goes directly into the storm drain system and straight to the ocean. At our car wash, dirty water from vehicles runs through a series of clarifiers where it is cleaned before entering the sewer system. We collect heavy contaminants as well as liquid particulates which are pumped out regularly by an environmental services company, so that such material does not end up in the sewer system. We believe that as compared to customers washing their own vehicles in their driveways, our express wash can save up to 80% in water usage. All wash cleaning materials used are non-toxic, biodegradable and eco-friendly. 4. Quality Project- Rapids Express believes that this project will be very well received by the community and intends to operate this facility for years to come. We intend to build a beautiful project that residents enjoy coming to and feel a significant value when they leave. As a result, we are planning on making a significant investment into the property. Both the wash equipment and vacuum system proposed are top of the line within the car wash industry. Also, the pre-fabricated steel “Tommy” building has a proven track record of being well received by customers and is very efficient. 5. Conforms with City Zoning. The subject property is located within the C-G zoning. A Car Wash is a permitted use with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. ARCHITECTURE Rapids Express intends to build a pre-fabricated steel “Totally Tommy” (www.tommycarwash) building. This building is manufactured by Tommy Car Wash Systems who has been in the manufacturing business for over 40 years. Their building design is proven and very efficient. Customers love the modern design because it feels light, open and very clean. It is similar to a microbrew look inside where everything looks clean and organized. The building itself is very streamlined, long and narrow with two tower elements that break up the lengthy wall planes and provide office and storage space. The ceiling is made of an opaque acrylic material which will let in natural light during daytime hours. This building has been very well received across the county, including our existing facility in Orange, CA. OPERATIONS At Rapids Express, each patron stays in their own car. In under 5 minutes, the patron exits the tunnel with a clean, dry car. Approximately 60% of our patrons will take advantage of one of our eighteen (18) free vacuum stations. Our price points are between $5-$14 depending on the wash package. The hours of operation will be from 7AM to 9PM, seven days per week. Once the facility is closed there will be no employees on site and there will be absolutely no noise coming from the facility. Rapids Express will be operated with 2-4 employees at any given time. Their descriptions are as follows: Greeter/ Pay Station Attendant- this person is located near the automated pay stations and is responsible for assisting with traffic flow, welcoming customers and helping any customer that is having difficulty with an automated pay station. Tunnel Operator- this person is responsible for the operations of the tunnel and making sure that vehicles are entering and exiting the tunnel properly and that the equipment is working correctly. Parking Lot/ Vacuum Attendant- This person is responsible for helping with smooth traffic flow, making sure there is no loud music playing from cars, making sure all trash is picked up, restroom is clean, answering customer questions and making sure vacuums are working properly and are put back in place. The demographic composition of our patrons is approximately 60% women. Women prefer our services over conventional full serve car washes primarily because they do not have to unbuckle their children (if they have them), they do not have 30-45 minutes to wait at a conventional full serve wash, they do not want to spend $15-$20 on a wash, and their groceries, sports equipment, change, electronics and other personal items are never exposed to theft. Rapids Express sells no gas, diesel or other petroleum products or merchandise of any kind. There is no convenience store on premises. However, there are a few vending machines that sell non-alcoholic beverages, towels, air freshener, etc… 7-Eleven Site #1043146 2501 E. Ball Rd. Anaheim, CA 92801 November 25, 2019 Re: Justification for Public Convenience or Necessity Please accept the following responses to the requested Justification for Public Convenience or Necessity 1. 7-Eleven is an internationally recognized brand since 1927 with a mission to make each customer’s day better, make lives easier and simply providing more convenience to the residents of the community. 7-Eleven seeks to be an integral part of the neighborhood and continually evaluates products and services for the needs of the local community. Along with a large variety of everyday product and specific 7-Eleven branded products, the sales of Beer & Wine for off-site consumption have long been a product, which the community has come to recognize, associate and expect with the 7-Eleven brand. Although beer and wine products are just a portion of the good and services, the proposed store will provide, the sales of beer & wine are an essential part of our business model as we strive to provide s project that meets the needs of the community. We have found in development statistics, that the lack of this product being provided in a store location, noticeable decreases sales potential. 2. The proposed project is located in census tract 963.06 and based on information from California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, there are only (2)-Two such facilities located in the boundary of the census tract that hold a type-20 license. One of which is an existing 7-Eleven store located @ 2145 E. Ball Rd, Anaheim. This location currently has a type 20 license, but this site does not provide the service station fueling as does the proposed project we are presenting. The other is a Chevron Service Station located at 1198 S. State College Blvd. We feel that this does not constitute an over concentration in this census tract. 3. The is a residential neighborhood located to both the south and north of the proposed property, along with a major off-ramp to the Orange Freeway to the east. There are 3 schools within a distance of 3,000 feet to the project site; James Guinn Elementary School @ 1,200 feet, Katella High School @ 3,000 feet and Benito Juarez Elementary School @ 4,000 feet away. ATTACHMENT NO. 11 We feel this proposed location does not have a negative impact on the neighborhood and surround schools. Since the site is located on the southern edge of the residential community along with having major freeway exiting along Ball, the typical adult commuter on their way home can purchase a beer & wine product along with other food products so that they do not have to make out of the way or additional stops on their way home. These products are offered as a convenience for these customers, including time efficiency savings, auto fuel consideration, safety probability for consolidation of trip frequencies, etc. 4. Beer and wine sales are not a large portion of the store business by dollar amount, and we are estimating approximately 10-12%. Additional note: if the store does not include beer and wine, experience shows that many customers will do all of their shopping at another location that is selling beer and wine as well. There-fore the overall economic impact on the profitability of the store is significant. 5. 7-Eleven provides a convenient place for commuters and for local residence to pick up food and sundry both on their way to and from their place of business or residence. As a majority of the local homeowners use the Ball Street on and off ramps, convenience is the primary factor that people frequent a 7-Eleven facility. 6. 7-Eleven has extensive training of employees to ensure that these products are sold responsibly, and that no underage customers can purchase age restricted items. 7-Eleven does not allow any such items to be consumed on the premises, no loitering or other behaviors that could have a negative impact on the image of the 7-Eleven or the immediate neighborhood. No pay phones or video games will be installed, and no adult magazines will be sold as these also have negative impacts. 7. The license request is for an off-sale type 20 license for Beer and Wine. This is not an existing license; this will be a new license. View of existing shopping center looking east from Sunkist Street: View of existing shopping center looking north from Ball Road: View of existing shopping center looking northeast from intersection: ATTACHMENT NO. 12 Anaheim Care, LLC owns the strip mall at 2501-2525 E Ball Road in Anaheim. Their plans for development include building a car wash and a 7-Eleven in the space and will be presenting their project to the Anaheim Planning Commission on January 20th. Throughout the planning process, Anaheim Care has focused heavily on how they can help ease the burden of the current tenants and the residents that live behind the land sited for development. In an effort to solicit community input, the developer has hosted a community outreach meeting with nearly 100 people in attendance and knocked on doors of residents to ensure their voices were heard. The support of their neighbors is a top priority. They have offered complimentary car washes to residents, changed the height of the boarding wall to create a sound barrier, and in some cases offered to place higher landscaping, reconfigured their design to ensure the sound does not negatively impact neighbors. In addition, Anaheim Care is determined to remain in good graces with the current tenants and continue their promise of an easy transition. With the Coronavirus pandemic, they have gone above and beyond to ensure the current tenets will not lose their space and can stay in business. They have offered reduced rent, helping tenets brainstorm ideas and find additional spaces, and sent grant information to all the tenants for them to take advantage of. Also, one of Anaheim’s most recognizable restaurants, the Jagerhaus is in this shopping center. Anaheim Care has taken the owner to view multiple properties and offered assistance in starting a new space. They have met with Sandra Sagert to draw perspective from Anaheim Beautiful and she is in support of the project. They also became members of Anaheim Beautiful. In addition, Anaheim Care has partnered with a neighboring Elementary school to construct a nutrition program with the 7-Eleven, to do quarterly workshops teaching the students the importance of nutrition. In an effort to invest in the local community, they have also promised local hires and will ensure Anaheim residents are first in line for qualifying jobs at the incoming 7-Eleven. The approval of this project will bring convenience and benefits to the city. Their efforts have been intentional and well received. They wish to be a great neighbor and help the current tenants find new space when the time comes. ATTACHMENT NO. 14 RE: Anaheim Care, LLC - 2501 -2525 E Ball Road Date: 01/07/2021 This package serves as a demonstration of all they have done to ensure the community concerns were taken into heavy consideration in their planning. Included in this package: -Community Outreach Document: Page 3 - Copy of Survey: Page 9 -Email Exchanges with Community: Page 10 -Notes from Community Door Knocking: Page 19 -Email Exchanges with Sandie: Page 20 -Email Exchange with Sandra Sagert: Page 25 -5G, LLC Rent Roll Worksheet: Page 26 -Letter of Recommendation - Fromer Mayor Pro Tem: Page 27 Community Outreach As a small family-run development group, we aim to establish long lasting connections with the communities we work in. 1.Community Meeting December 4th we hosted a community meeting with the neighbors where we had a chance to hear their concerns, address their worries and make changes wherever possible. We were fortunate to meet a large crowd that night and strived to connect with each one. Overall the main concerns that community members held were the following: o They preferred a Trader Joe’s or Gelsons o Noise o Concerns over gas leak hurting neighboring gardens o 7-Eleven becoming a transient hot spot o The future of Jagerhaus →We patiently answered each question →After the library closed, the dialogue continued to the parking lot where we stayed another couple of hours getting to know the community and making sure they felt heard →We explained to them that the property’s location is not desirable for a grocery store. We have a close connection with major grocers such as Trader Joes, Smart and Final and Grocery Outlet, and they have all rejected this location. →We explained that Veneklassen Associates had performed an extensive sound study on the current sound at the center and the projected sound with our uses. Our development shows an increase of only 1 decibel to the current noise level. Therefore, the difference is negligible. →Through explaining the rigorous California standards to prevent gas leaks, neighbors were sufficiently assuaged that garden-contamination is not a concern. →There is a well-known misconception over 7-Eleven’s appeal of becoming a transient hot-spot. 7-Eleven has implemented many criteria for franchisees to ensure this does not happen. Firstly, franchises are required to employ additional staff specifically assigned to making sure the store is transient free. Moreover, bright lights and soft classical music along the outside perimeter of the store deter people from loitering. →From the overwhelming support that residents showed towards Sandie of Jagerhaus, we knew that finding Jagerhaus a new home would be at the top of our agenda to gain the community’s trust and respect. As we spoke with community members outside the library doors on the night of December 4th, we heard from Anaheim citizens like Donald Fife who reiterated, “If Sandie is happy then we are happy.” 2.Continuing the Relationship →Some people had to leave after the meeting and left me with questions and their email which I followed up within the week. Please see attached email from Paul Zavala as an example of this gesture. He had some questions and I followed up to make sure he felt answered. He appreciated the follow-up and was encouraged by our presentation to see an upgrade from the current aesthetics and vendors of the center. →We also collected email addresses from all the participants that night and shared updates of our development. Attached, please see a response from Rush and Christa Robinson. Like other community members, they were worried about Jagerhaus. After hearing about our outreach with Sandie, they greatly appreciated our efforts. →We have also been sending updates through our progress with the development and hearing feedback throughout the process. 3.Door Knocking the Community →Another component of our outreach included walking through the neighborhood and getting to know the neighbors. •North on Alki and Hilda •South on Riles, Omega and Larke Ellen •West on Cliffpark •East past the 57 freeway to Maverick and Chantilly →As can be imagined, support and opposition ran the spectrum. •There were some who simply did not want change and were happy the way it was. •Others did not want bright lights. We explained to them that the lights will only be pointing to the buildings and not affect any homes. •There were also a significant number of residents who said the center looks old and needs to be up to par with Anaheim standards. •Out of all the feedback we received, the strongest and most passionate was in support of Sandie and Jagerhaus. 4.Contiguous Neighbors on Hilda Street →We sent letters in hand-addressed envelopes to connect and hear their ideas. →On 3-2-2020, we were invited into Mary and Daniel’s home on 1196 Hilda. We chatted for several hours and heard their concerns. 1.They asked for tall trees along the back wall; we happily accepted. 2.They asked for an additional 8 foot wall to run along the backs of their wall; we incorporated that into our site plan 3.They asked for an extra 4 foot plexiglass above the 8 foot wall to further mitigate possible noise. Even though this is over the scope of our responsibility, we want to be as helpful as possible and will be offering this plexiglass as a topper to the 8 foot wall to any home that requests it. 4.They were concerned about traffic flowing off of Sunkist from the rear of the carwash; we changed our carwash layout so that the queuing would line in the rear. We ended our chat at their home with warm hugs and have continued the relationship through email. →On Oct 29, 2020, we walked through Hilda Street to survey the neighbors’ requests for the back wall. •Neighbors appreciated having a chance to speak face to face. •We shared the findings of our sound survey. •Most neighbors were home but wanted time to weigh their options. •We left a survey with a hand-written note for the neighbors who were not home. •One neighbor, who we had met with in the past, again voiced her opposition. She insisted to us to keep the current tenants and layout and build a park with the undeveloped space. At the end of the conversation, she expressed gratitude for the opportunity to vent. We met her again on November 4th to continue the conversation. •Some neighbors were excited for the development. →We followed up with neighbors on Nov. 17, 2020 where we toured the neighborhood again. •Neighbors were encouraged to see us again. •I shared a copy of The Oil and Gas Review with a neighbor who initially expressed concern for gas leakage into his garden at the Decemeber 4th meeting. •The neighbors who responded all wanted their wall to be replaced with an eight foot wall. •We offered upgrading neighbors window to triple pane which they also appreciated. •Some neighbors also asked for some complementary yard work that we have happily accepted. 5.Reaching out to Sandie of Jagerhaus →Knowing we would have to go to infinity and beyond, we understood the sensitivity of the subject, and we can confidently say we have done more for Jagerhaus than we have done for any other tenant in our family’s history of commercial real estate. →We sat with Sandie and heard her story. It was one of strength and hard work. Overlooking every detail from marinating her meat to collecting the fruits for her famous jam, Sandie managed to bring Jagerhaus the powerful reputation it has earned which stretches beyond the borders of California. She explained the reasons why she liked this location, and her apprehension of being on a month to month lease for the past several years. →We scoured available and off-market listings to find those features in a nearby location and assured her that she is not alone. We told her we will walk the course with her till we find a suitable new location. →After speaking with Sandie we were able to compile a list of components she wanted in her new location: Sandie’s Wish List 1.Minimum of 4500 square feet 2.Community meeting room 3.Second generation restaurant 4.Off the freeway 5.Ample Parking 6.Ease of Parking (no high curbs because of customer’s physical limitations) 7.Not near other high parking uses such as grocery store, DMV or other restaurants, sporting arenas, etc. 8.Good visibility 9.Low traffic counts 10.Outdoor patio 11.Within 5-6 miles of current location 12.Looking for below market rates →We started with a list of over 100 sites which we were able to narrow down to the top six which closely matched her wish list. I personally drove her around with my team on two separate occasions. We drove to each, heard her feedback, each location missed something from her wish list. o 1623 West Katella o 2406 East Katella o 2230 East Lincoln Ave o 1110 Western Ave o 1093 N. State College Blvd. o 540 North Euclid (former Marie Calendar’s) →When visiting the former Marie Calendar’s, Sandie showed interest and was drawn to the charm of the building as well as the synergy of being in Anaheim Plaza. However, she was hesitant to take over 9500 square feet of restaurant space (nearly double the current Jagerhaus layout). Using our connections, we were able to secure a Letter of Intent from AutoZone to share the space with her. We also offered our financial resources to help her gain the tenancy. →Ultimately, Sandie passed on the location because she did not feel Jagerhaus would thrive in that setting. →Commissioner Steve White guided us to Anaheim Business Retention. Through the department of business retention, we were able to find a wealth of resources for all our tenants. Amanda Wicker, an analyst who works in the Community and Economic Development Department, compiled a list of available sites based on Sandie’s Wish List and worked together with Sandie. 1.2406-2438 East Katella 2.1199 North Euclid Street 3.676 S. State College Blvd →Amanda also introduced us to Manal Richa, director of the Small Business Development Center, who offered to connect Sandie to restaurant experts that can help evaluate business strategies to enable businesses to survive and thrive. Manal also referred us to grants available for Anaheim’s small businesses. We shared this information with all our tenants and many were able to take advantage of this resource including Jagerhaus. Both Amanda and Manal’s reports of interactions with Sandie are attached to this report. →We recently showed Sandie 30 Anaheim and are working together to make this a reality. We have manifested our earnest desire in helping Sandie in this venture through a Letter of Intent. Sandie is currently constructing a budget to present to us to make this dream a reality. →We have offered Sandie $40,000 to ease her transition. 6.Code Enforcement →In an effort to seek the advice of senior-level advisors, we turned to Planning Commissioners and Council-Members. •Council Member Moreno was concerned over sound levels and possible drainage of Code Enforcement resources. He explained that, even if the sound was according to code, neighbors are still able to bring out officers repeatedly to check and recheck sound levels. •With this information, we turned to Sandra Sagert, president of Code Enforcement. After a detailed presentation of our project, she volunteered strong support for the project. As vice president of Anaheim beautiful, she was pleased and supported the landscape plan. Sandra assured us that from a code enforcement perspective our development would not create extra problems or drain resources. Once an officer is sent out for a sound complaint, that reading will create a precedent and require no further testing despite additional complaints. 7.7-Eleven’s Community Outreach ➔Upon the recommendation of Commissioner Keyes, we turned to 7-Eleven and asked them to construct a nutrition plan with James Guinn, the neighboring elementary school. We have been able to connect to the school and are in the process of launching the following plan. 7- Eleven representatives and Franchisee with knowledge of the 7-Eleven food chain will do quarterly Nutrition Workshops for the school -- either class by class or in a larger setting (school wide presentations in the auditorium) •They will talk about: o Why 7-Eleven decided to focus on a brand new line of healthy item o What types of healthy offerings they have and what healthy benefits they provide (and why that is important) o The benefits of having a local commissary with local food sources from which the salads, sandwiches, fruit cups and veggie medley ▪When school is back in session, COVID is under control and schools allow field trips again, 7-Eleven will coordinate with the school to potentially have field trips to the commissary to show how the food is made with local ingredients from local farms. •Every month, the local Franchise will donate fresh fruit to the school for each class •The 7-Eleven franchisee will sponsor vegetable gardens for each class (providing the seeds and material to build and maintain the garden) •7-Eleven also commits to offering a day each quarter to donating a percentage of their sales to James Guinn. 8.Helping Tenants →In the wake of COVID-19, we extended 20% off all the tenants’ April rent. →Also, with the second wave of stay at home orders, we responded with an additional 10% off another month’s rent. This respite offered breathing space for tenants in the backlash of decreased business. We also constructed payment plans for tenants with financial difficulty and allowed penalty- free extensions for their rental payments. Anaheim Care, LLC 7 Dear Hilda Street Neighbor, Thank you so much for taking part in our neighborhood survey! As we are completing our plans and submitting to the city, we want to include your opinions in our proposal. Please circle an option below: A.I would like my back-wall replaced with a brand new 8 foot wall with a 4 foot plexiglass above it. This wall will be a total of 12 feet high. B.I would like to keep my existing wall and have the developers build an 8 foot adjacent wall with a 4 foot plexiglass. This wall will be a total of 12 feet high. I understand that this double wall might create a hazard for small children and/or be unsanitary. C.I would like the project to add to my existing wall which will raise it to 8 feet and add an additional 4 feet of plexiglass. This wall will be a total of 12 feet high. I understand that developers might use structural beams to reinforce the wall. D.____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Your Name and Address: ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Responses from touring Hilda Street Neighbors on 10.29.20 with Mike and Chris HOUSE #NAME NOTES from visit on 10-29 PREFERENCE ON WALL 4-Nov Notes on visit from 11-17 with Mike V Visiting again on 1/7 1182 Wasn't home. Left a hand written note with wall survey. Received email Heng Schenk (owner) sent an email responding to my letter for his tenant. He would like the wall to be replaced plus 4 foot of plexiglass hengschenk 1184 Wasn't home. Left a hand written note with wall survey. revol21s kduong116 Emailed on 12.21. Texted and left VM on 12.22no response emailed again on 12/29 1186 Wasn't home. Left a hand written note with wall survey. 1188 Eugene Valued education Appreciated sound study said he would side with Bob and Diane liked the idea of triple paned windows likes wall to be replaced remembered shira Did not want to talk too much because of COVID Willing to replace back wall 1190 Bob and Diane McNall Biggest Opposition on block Wants us to keep existing tenants and build a park on undeveloped land need to follow up with sound study I think they can be convinced if we persuade them no additional noise wanted to think it over. Shira and Chris went on 11-4-20 to drop of sound study and 7-Eleven coffee with hand written note from shira. Diane seemed more pleasant and appreciated gesture Weren't home. Left them another wall survey with handwritten note 1192 Fatima Best supporter on block is ok with anthing loves 7-eleven husband drives a mile out to 7-eleven instead of going to liquor store on existing property loves idea of free carwashes ok with anything 1194 Bob Only Mike spoke with him Wants to see sound study wants to think it over remebered Shira from town meeting. Retired…was an engineer for the city. Has cypress trees in back that he would like trimmed by developers. Left him a sound study too. Will be ok with increasing height of wall as long as we help with yardwork. 1196 Daniel and Mary Preferred layout with queing in the front Supported us before but wants to think it over wants to think it over. Daniel was in a zoom meeting but we left him a wall survey. Continued with Mary over a string of emails Ideas Mary offered -Blocking off alley with walls creating an empty space -Annexing 5 feet from the back of our property to widen her backyard -Loves free carwashes -Tall trees -asked for us to erect a topper on east/west walls of her backyard 1198 Mrs. Park and Patrick Very skeptical and want to think it over wants to think it over said they will agree with Daniel and Mary. Like the idea of replacing wall with plexiglass 1185 Laramie Jim McDonald worried about gas impact to garden will get back to me Gave him a Oil and Gas Review on strict laws of CA for gas stations. Seemed convinced. He is ok with wall plus plexiglass next door wasn't home. left wall survey wasn't home. Left wall survey with handwritten note Jim said they both agree to do wall with plexiglass Jim also said it was this neighbor that convinced him. 1/6/2021 Gmail - Marie Callender's @ Anaheim Plaza https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=747c351d74&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%3Ar-5280201933537474442&simpl=msg-a%3Ar81921025…2/2 Sincerely, Ilan Golcheh President Golcheh Group Affiliated with Progressive Real Estate DRE License Number: 01222963 1180 S Beverly Dr. Los Angeles CA 90035 Suite 300 Ilan@GolchehGroup.com Cell: ( 9/10/2020 Gmail - any updates? https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=747c351d74&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1673043195315015381&simpl=msg-f%3A16730431953…1/1 Shira Zaghi any updates? Amanda Wicker <AWicker@anaheim.net>Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:05 PM To: Manal Richa , Shira Zaghi Hi Shira, I spoke with Sandie on the phone regarding the commercial proper 9/2/2020 Gmail - For your review https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=747c351d74&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1671126841090905583&simpl=msg-f%3A16711268410…1/1 Shira Zaghi For your review Sandra Sagert <SSagert@anaheim.net>Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:25 AM To: Shira Zaghi < Good morning, Wanted to thank you for taking the time to set up the zoom mtg and your great presentation and meeting your family! Both personally and professionally I appreciate everything your family is doing to not only bring a beautiful project to our city but trying to also help those businesses relocate and stay within our city. As mentioned in our meeting my only concerns would be to make sure as you construct your project to be ready for vandalism and remove any graffiti right away and after construction while some of your landscaping may take some time to fill over the wall. Also, be cognizant of the large grassy area to the east that abuts the freeway off ramp as trash and debris tend to fly off the freeway and try and avoid trespassers onto your nice landscaping from potential people panhandling off the freeway. We talked about lighting and placing signs about property under surveillance to help deter loitering, trespassing and other potential criminal activity. I can work with your family after construction with trespassing letters to put on file with the city in case you are in need of assistance with trespassers. I love the landscaping and signage as it really blends in with the residential neighborhood! Also as promised below is our city’s webpage on addressing homelessness and all of the programs and projects we have to help our most vulnerable population. https://www.anaheim.net/4991/Addressing-Homelessness Thanks again for sharing your family, project and vision and hoping you and your family have a safe and happy 4th of July! Sandra From: Shira Zaghi Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 1:44 PM To: Sandra Sagert <SSagert@anaheim.net> Subject: For your review Hi Sandra, [Quoted text hidden] Rent roll for 2501 - 2525 E Ball Rd, Anaheim, CA 92806 Address Business Name Year Rent Triple Net CAM Total Due SQ FT Term 2501 His Nibs Liquor 2001 2,600.00$ partial 561 3,161.00$ 3136 month to month 2503 Mechlor Bakery 2003 1,475.00$ No 0 1,475.00$ 1344 month to month 2505 Sunkist Donut 1988 952.00$ No $0 $952.00 1120 month to month 2507 Home Master 2004 600.00$ No 0 600.00$ 1400 month to month 2509 New Look Beauty 2004 975.00$ Yes 150 1,125.00$ 840 month to month 2511 New Look Beauty 2014 1,200.00$ Yes 0 -$ 1120 month to month 2513 Vacant -$ 0 0 0 1120 none 2515 West Way Cleaners 2005 1,232.00$ Yes 380.95 1,612.95$ 1120 month to month 2517 Ace Flowers 2005 1,120.00$ Yes 380.95 1,500.95$ 1120 month to month 2519 - 2525 Jaegerhouse German Rest 2000 5,824.00$ Yes $1,524 $7,347.80 4480 month to month Monthly Base Rent 15,978.00$ 2996.7 17,774.70$ 16800 5G, LLC 1180 S. Beverly Dr. Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90035 Responses from touring Hilda Street Neighbors on 10.29.20 with Mike and Chris HOUSE #NAME Shira, Chris and Mike visited on 10-29 PREFERENCE ON WALL 4-Nov Shira and Mike visited on 11-17 Shira and Chris visited again on 1/7 1182 Wasn't home. Left a hand written note with wall survey. Received email Heng Schenk (owner) sent an email responding to my letter for his tenant. He would like the wall to be replaced plus 4 foot of plexiglass hengschenk 1184 Wasn't home. Left a hand written note with wall survey. revol21s kduong11 Emailed on 12.21. Texted and left VM on 12.22no response emailed again on 12/29 Kyyla and Tri. Did not want to talk in person Emailed me their response revol21s kduong11 They are opposed to the project Their preference for the wall is to have a double wall. Also concerned about sound. Responded to email on 1-8 addressing their concerns 1186 Wasn't home. Left a hand written note with wall survey. Anh Tran wants to keep wall and have it reinforced with blue or white plexiglass topper 1188 Eugene Valued education Appreciated sound study said he would side with Bob and Diane liked the idea of triple paned windows likes wa l to be replaced remembered shira Did not want to talk too much because of COVID Willing to replace back wall Will agree to whatever Bob and Diane decide 1190 Bob and Diane McNall Biggest Opposition on block Wants us to keep existing tenants and build a park on undeveloped land need to follow up with sound study I think they can be convinced if we persuade them no additional noise wanted to think it over. Shira and Chris went on 11-4- 20 to drop of sound study and 7-Eleven coffee with hand written note from shira. Diane seemed more pleasant and appreciated gesture Weren't home. Left them another wall survey with handwritten note More friendly but still opposed. They said they are circulating a petition through neighborhood. They will be ok with reinforcing wall and plexiglass. They have trees in backyard-- need to make sure that we don’t damage them with building wall. They also want us to add triple pane windows to theur kitchen slider and back bedrooms. 1192 Fatima Best supporter on block is ok with anthing loves 7-eleven husband drives a mile out to 7-eleven instead of going to liquor store on existing property loves idea of free carwashes ok with anything Spoke with Sister Nancy. Fatima's husband is Enrique. Fatima-329 1194 Steve Halbert Only Mike spoke with him Wants to see sound study wants to think it over remebered Shira from town meeting. Retired…was an engineer for the city. Has cypress trees in back that he would like trimmed by developers. Left him a sound study too. Will be ok with increasing height of wall as long as we help with yardwork. Steve Halber Spoke to him for about an hour. Good supporter. Likes both uses. OK to reinforce wall. 1196 Daniel and Mary Preferred layout with queing in the front Supported us before but wants to think it over wants to think it over. Daniel was in a zoom meeting but we left him a wall survey. Continued with Mary over a string of emails Ideas Mary offered -Blocking off alley with walls creating an empty space -Annexing 5 feet from the back of our property to widen her backyard -Loves free carwashes -Tall trees -asked for us to erect a topper on east/west walls of her backyard Asked for a phone conference. Appreciates all our efforts to assit. Wants a new wall with plexiglass. Asked for it not to happen during summer months Likes free carwashes. Asked for triple pane windows in the back of her house. Wants us to move her wall toppers to the east and west. Asked for updates as we proceed. Was very impressed with all our efforts to help tenants 1198 Mrs. Park and Patrick Older Korean lady with son Patrick. Very skeptical and want to think it over wants to think it over said they will agree with Daniel and Mary. Like the idea of replacing wall with plexiglass Recovered from Covid. Deciding between reinforcing or new wall. She is concerned from an insurance perspective and wants to confrim with her insurance agent before deciding between new wall vs reinforcing 1185 Laramie Jim McDonald worried about gas impact to garden will get back to me Gave him a Oil and Gas Review on strict laws of CA for gas stations. Seemed convinced. He is ok with wa l plus plexiglass wants new wall plus plexiglass next door wasn't home. left wall survey wasn't home. Left wall survey with handwritten note Jim said they both agree to do wall with plexiglass Jim also said it was this neighbor that convinced him.not home but will side with Jim From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Save Jagerhaus German Restaurant Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 1:19:49 PM I am a long time residence of Anaheim. Please, Please make the right decision and allow this wonderful Family restaurant stay at this location. E Anaheim is in need of nice family style eating establishments. Thanks in advance for making my wish come true. Thanks again for your honest vote ATTACHMENT NO. 15 From: To:Planning Commission Subject:DEV2019-00042 Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 7:07:19 PM Hello, I received a letter about the project stated in this subject line and am very shocked. I have been to Jagerhaus quite a few times since being a permanent resident of Anaheim for just over a year now. One of the reasons we loved the property we closed escrow for was because of the close walking distance to this fabulous restaurant..I am NOT in support of this project and am opposed to what the project entails, as it is not only trying to obliterate a great and long- standing business, but is trying to replace it with businesses that there are already a plethora of in this city, a few being just 3 mins walking distance from the restaurant itself. Jagerhaus is actually an attraction for this city, whether it may seem like it or not. I have many friends and family members who do not live in the city of Anaheim and who have been visiting it for years and continue to. They are of different ethnic backgrounds as well, so this goes to show that THE German restaurant to visit is Jagerhaus. It’s how I heard about the restaurant. I always have a glimpse at the parking lot when passing by, and I’ve only observed the parking lot being packed with friends and family laughing and having a great time when exiting the restaurant. I have met the owner herself of this restaurant and she truly embodies what a passionate business owner should. And it explains why this restaurant had and still had the reputation it does. Please do not follow through with this project. Regards, Olivia From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Jägerhaus restaurant Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 8:22:10 PM Very sorry to hear that the city of Anaheim is even contemplating to further downgrade the city by allowing the site where the Jägerhaus restaurant (and other businesses) are located off Ball road to be removed to add a 7-11 and car wash. I can only say that I have been dining at the Jägerhaus since 1983, and consider it one of the highlights for both the city of Anaheim, and the Southern California area. No offense, but Anaheim does not need another car wash or 7-11 in the city, bottom line, who cares? Keep the establishments that mean something to the city, and that bring patrons into Anaheim to enjoy what other cities do not have. I can only say that I would never patronize a car wash or 7-11 at the site of the Jägerhaus, and I believe that many people, both within and outside of the city of Anaheim, would agree. This is in reference to DEV2019-00042 From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Project Number DEV2019-00042 Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 9:16:42 PM Hello- The city of Anaheim does need yet another 7-11 or car wash. That area is already badly congesed as it is and as a concerned tax paying Anaheim resident this will impact us who live here than anyone who thought this was a good idea. Stop taking small business out of Anaheim. We love Jagerhaus very much and do t want to see it removed only to be replaced by the billionth 7-11. Sincerely, Jenny Romero Anaheim resident since 2009 Sent from my iPhone From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Project Number DEV2019-00042 Date:Sunday, January 10, 2021 4:20:28 PM Importance:High This is to inform all of you that I, in addition to many more neighbors and others who don’t even live in the neighborhood, strongly oppose the proposed plan of placing a carwash/gas station and 7-11 on the subject property. We want the Jagerhaus to remain and include a bier garden (beer garden) to be able to occupy the entire piece of property where it is now located! A new and bigger Jagerhaus would be an asset to the surrounding community and to the City of Anaheim. A welcome change and it would draw a lot of business from the resort area and sports venues. Many people come from south OC, and other surrounding counties (L.A., Riverside, San Bernardino) to enjoy the cuisine and friendliness of the Jagerhaus. This would only add to the pride of the neighborhood and would be a notable “visitor” attraction. By putting a carwash/gas station and 7-11 on that property, it will become a blighted area. There are already far too many carwashes, gas stations, and 7-11’s in this area. It will attract more homeless and undesirable people that will loiter in and around the area. Anaheim is becoming a more dangerous and unsafe area and places like these will only add to the problem! I urge all of you who are involved in this decision, to make the right decision and allow the Jagerhaus to expand on this property. If you lived in our neighborhood and the surrounding ones, I’m sure each of you would not want to see this property become blighted, and very close to your homes, as mentioned above! Thank you for the opportunity to let our voices be heard. Judy Villegas From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc:Planning Commission Subject:STOP another 7-Eleven, Gas Station ad Express Car Wash on Sunkist and Ball Road Date:Sunday, January 10, 2021 4:21:14 PM This is to let you know how opposed I am to allowing another car wash, 7-Eleven, gas station and Express car wash from being built on the corner of Sunkist and Ball Road. We you probably already know there are numerous such businesses within a 5-mile radius as follows: 13 7-Elevens with one only 1/2 mile away 19 gas stations with one right across the street and another 4 about 1/2 mile away 12 car washes with two new Rapid Express on State College just a couple miles away I wonder how you expect all these numerous businesses to be profitable with so many close by. What is going to happen to the property when one or more of these businesses go belly up because they can't be profitable?? The property will probably remain empty for years just like to old Ralphs on Lincoln and Rio Vista and crime will move in. I want the Jagerhaus German Restaurant to be there for many more years. My family started eating there in the 1960s and knew the original owner. Its food is delicious and a place where we run into neighbors and chat for a few minutes. It's a sense of community. Please don't destroy our neighborhood and community. I hope you will consider rejecting project. Thank you Gladys James Anaheim, CA 92806 From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Cc:Wayne Carvalho; Elly Morris Subject:Re: Notice of Planning Commission Meeting - Wed. January 20, 2021 Date:Sunday, January 10, 2021 4:52:03 PM I say leave the property as is, leave HisNibs, Jagerhaus and the other businesses alone. John Buhs Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, January 10, 2021, 4:47 PM, Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> wrote: SEE ATTACHMENT NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, January 20, 2021 5PM From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Sunday, January 10, 2021 7:12:00 PM Hello Mr. Carvalho, I am asking that you and the city panel make the right decision, not to allow the planned car wash and other small businesses to replace the Jagerhaus Restaurant. This restaurant has been there for a long time and is enjoyed by so many people. With people stressing over what’s happening in this world, our country, and locally, please don’t add another thing to the list. Restaurants have closed right and left due to the economy and people are at their wits end. A lot of people have posted that they left CA and when they return to visit, they frequent this restaurant. I will be watching what decision is made with a lot of other people. Please, make the right decision. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:WE HIGHLY OPPOSE THIS PROJECT Date:Sunday, January 10, 2021 9:15:40 PM Sent from my iPhone From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Oppose Date:Sunday, January 10, 2021 10:54:09 PM I oppose to this project. From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Oppose 7/11 on Ball and Sunkist Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 12:55:23 AM I whole heartedly oppose the proposed car wash and 7/11 project. Those are chain retail stores of which there are several already in the neighborhood in question. We need to keep/support our local independent businesses! These businesses have been around for a long time and need to be supported not demolished! This project would be a bad move. Definitely not for the betterment of Anaheim. Keep our small businesses! Sincerely, S. Kirn Anaheim native From:Grace Medina on behalf of David See To:Wayne Carvalho Cc:Elly Morris; Maggie Zaragoza Subject:FW: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 8:48:40 AM From: Diana Gomez <> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 10:11 PM To: David See <DSee@anaheim.net> Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Mr. See, East Anaheim does NOT need another carwash! We already have a new one on State College and Lincoln, one on State College and La Palma, one on Sunkist and Lincoln. What exactly are you trying to do to East Anaheim because beautifying it, does not seem to be on your agenda! You don't see these carwashes on every corner in Irvine, nor Newport Beach! Why? Because they are eye soars! We have more than enough in East Anaheim. I urge you to vote no on the new carwash off of Ball and Sunkist and keep the Jagerhouse! My friends and family in the area feel the same and you will be hearing from them too! Sincerely, Diana Gomez East Anaheim Resident. From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Planning commission public comment Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 9:15:27 AM Hello Mr. Carvalho, as well as the Planning commission, I had already emailed my concerns about the gas station on Sunkist and Ball but I will include another email below. Anaheim has an important cultural history prior to Disneyland that should be protected. Anaheim’s German immigrants were important founders to our city and Jagerhaus is an important cultural relic that visitors to our city can visit. Another ordinary gas station and strip mall would diminish the originality of Anaheim and just make Ball Rd and Sunkist another boring juncture that just invites more crime and vagrancy. Ball Rd was always the exit my family would take to get to Disneyland and seeing Jagerhaus was always a fun reminder of where we were headed and, that we were almost there. Anaheim has been through difficult times but another gas station is not what we need. We need to protect places that are happy and have good memories, not disgusting gas stations. Respectfully, Amy Hammerschlag Resident of Anaheim and former DLR cast member Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos and autocorrect fumbles! On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:47 PM, Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> wrote: SEE ATTACHMENT NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, January 20, 2021 5PM <PC 01 20 2021_Public Notice_DEV2019-00042.pdf> Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos and autocorrect fumbles! From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:RE: Notice of Planning Commission Meeting - Wed. January 20, 2021 Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 9:24:29 AM With the COVID pandemic there is no way in hell I will attend a public meeting. This meeting should be on Zoom. For the record, I am completely against this project. We do not need another convenience store – there are plenty of them & a car wash? Completely unnecessary. Jagerhaus is a classic restaurant and needs to stay ON LOCATION. My vote is NO. Elliott Brender, MD, FACS President & Founder, Surgeons for Cambodia, Inc. Retired Clinical Professor of Surgery, University of California Irvine www.surgeonsforcambodia.org From: Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 4:47 PM To: Planning Commission <PCommision@anaheim.net> Cc: Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net>; Elly Morris <Emorris@anaheim.net> Subject: Notice of Planning Commission Meeting - Wed. January 20, 2021 SEE ATTACHMENT NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, January 20, 2021 5PM This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc:Ryan Del Rosario Juan & Vi’s Grandson; Vi Del Rosario; Michael Villegas; Greg Villegas; Jami, Villegas, Garrison; Planning Commission Subject:Ref: Project Number DEV2019-00042 Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 10:19:47 AM As a concerned & long standing Anaheim resident who lives within walking distance to this location/project.( our 3 children were raised in this neighborhood & graduated from Katella High School) We’re greatly opposed and upset that anyone would even consider building “another” 7-Eleven, Gas Station, or a Car Wash! With a successful Restaurant that’s already in that location that can be expanded? This should be a “no brainer” in expanding the Jagerhaus Restaurant & improving Anaheim. With gasoline cars coming to a end,. Taking most 7-11’s with them,. And 12 CAR WASHES with a 5 mile radius of this project,. Just doesn’t make sense to us. We have many friends, outside of Anaheim that love coming to our house, they’d park their cars at our house & we’d walk to this Restaurant. Let’s expand this Restaurant. That would IMPROVE this location & City. Respectfully, Skip Villegas From: To:planniingcommssion@anaheim.net; Wayne Carvalho Subject:Proposed 7-Eleven, Gas Station & Express Car Wash on corner of Ball and Sunkist in Anaheim Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 10:55:26 AM Our family is opposed to the proposed car wash, gas station, and 7-eleven at this location. Not only is this project not needed in this area, it would be detrimental to our neighborhood’s environment. This proposed project would create a traffic nightmare on Sunkist and Ball. It would increase air, water and noise pollution to our neighborhood, and would be a magnet for a criminal element, especially at night. Please do not approve this project. Thank you. Shirlynn Robin Michael Robin From: To:Planning Commission Cc:sfaessel@anahiem.net Subject:DEV2019-00042 Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 12:21:36 PM To whom it may concern, this email is to let you know my disappointment what the new owners of the property on Ball and Sunkist want to do. A car and 7Eleven is not an option since there is the exact same business close by. It's not fair for the people that live in the neighborhood behind that property. Plus, that intersection and the exit of Ball Rd. off of the 57 fwy only brings more traffic to the area. I live in the neighborhood and I always use Lincoln exit to avoid traffic. Finally, this shopping center has been the home to many businesses that have been part of our community for years. As part of the community of D5 I know residents don't want to see the restaurant go nor do i. so please do not approve the carwash and 7 eleven in that area. It's bad business for the car wash and 7/11 on State College and Ball. we want the current shopping center to stay. Or what are we not Anaheim hills that you will just vote against our will. We deserve respect and as a resident of the local I ask you to consider the residents first and not the new business. Jeanette O. Saldivar From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 1:13:36 PM Dear sirs, I have lived in Southern CA most of my life. It troubles me that every square inch of vacant property around has to be built on. I totally disagree with the building of another convience store and car wash to be put into my handy corner of Ball rd and Sunkist. A favorite and popular German Restrurant ?Jagerhaus? would be put out of business. That?s unacceptable. There?s something to say about keeping some of Anaheim?s historical sites, shops and restaurants. I live in this neighborhood and enjoy being able to walk to the Liquor store ( already there), walk my Grandkids to the donut store or have breakfast, lunch or dinner at the Jagerhaus. That already is a busy corner. We DO N OT need more congestion stopping traffic while leaving the freeway. Please reconsider this proposal. Sincerely, Cindy Fena. From: To:planningcommision@anaheim.net Cc:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Carwash/7-11/Gas Station Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 2:28:29 PM Hello Planning Commission and Mr. Caravalho, I live in the neighborhood close to Ball and Sunkist. And I am writing to let you know that I am not happy with the planned development of a Carwash, 7-11 & Gas Station at that corner. My main concern is the Noise, traffic and congestion at that corner already, and how much more this will create. Also importantly what about the loss of all the established small businesses that are on that corner. The Jagerhaus is a landmark restaurant to a lot of people. Yes the building is an eyesore, and needs updating. I’ve been here in This neighborhood for over 20yrs and some change is good. However in this case yet another Carwash is not the answer for that corner. There is already a Carwash at Lincoln/Sunkist and Ball/Sunkist? Also what about the one that just opened on State College at the former Sizzler site? Seriously Do we really need another Carwash?? I don’t know what the answer is, but developers don’t care about neighborhoods, they care about making money. I have watched this neighborhood go downhill since when I moved here 20yrs. ago. Carwashes are not pretty they are Noisy. Why another 7/11 there is one less than a 1/2 mile away. Which by the way always has sketchy people hanging out in front of it. I’d rather have the ugly building with the nice dry cleaner lady, the Jagerhaus restaurant and the Bakery & liquor store over this Proposed development. Please listen to the people that live in this neighborhood, we pay property taxes here and we have to live here. I’m sure this developer who doesn’t even live around here would want a Noisy Carwash and 7/11 built right behind his house. Would you???? Thank you for your Time, B. Huffman Sent from my iPhone From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Ball and Sunkist Corner Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 3:43:25 PM Mr. Carvalho, My reasons for opposing the proposed project on this corner are: 1. Traffic 2. Traffic 3. Traffic Granted, this corner does need revitalization, but that could be limited to an updated 7-eleven market and improved storefronts. It DOES NOT need a humongous car wash facility when there are so many others in the area. The new one on State College has a much easier in and out. The same for the one on Tustin Avenue in nearby Orange. There is a new jiffy car wash on the corner of Sunkist and Lincoln and Puddles down the street for those who don’t want to dry their own cars. Living in the neighborhood for nearly 50 years, I have seen the increase in traffic on Sunkist just trying to get in and out of our tract. The relatively recent redesign of this intersection made it easier to negotiate a left turn off Sunkist going South. However, entering and exiting from this corner, unless you intend to continue North on Sunkist, is already awkward, inconvenient and possibly dangerous. Adding a car wash in this location would only add to the current situation. Perhaps, a scaled down plan would be more beneficial to this area and to the business owners. Thank you and good luck. Virus-free. www.avast.com From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Do not demolish the Jagerhaus. Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 4:15:35 PM -a new resident of Anaheim. From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:NO to 7-11 project at Ball/Sunkist Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 6:37:14 PM Please share my feedback at the planning meeting. I have lived very near Sunkist and Ball for the last 17 years. I have driven past the current 7-11 and car wash on Ball near State College and there are always homeless people, litter and traffic jams in the lot. I have 2 teenage girls who are afraid to go there. The current businesses at Ball and Sunkist seem to take care to prevent loitering or begging in the parking lot. Those businesses also have plenty of space for traffic and parking. I am an advocate for small businesses and that is what we have at Sunkist and Ball. If we move in a 2nd 7-11 and 2nd Car wash the traffic will be awful at an already busy intersection. There will also be loitering and begging because a business like 7-11 does not care to stop these activities. I know that our property values will drop as these convenience businesses are too much and too close for comfort. Also, new home owners, especially those with young kids, dont care to live so close to these types of businesses where it seems unsafe. For the above reasons I ask that you Please do not approve this project. Best Regards, Valerie Parra From: To:Planning Commission Subject:We need renovation and innovation Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 7:32:27 PM Hello, valued planning commissioner! I hope you are having a wonderful day! I am a senior resident in Anaheim living on Sunkist. I heard there was a dispute regarding Jagerhaus and I wanted to give my 2 cents. The Jagerhaus restaurant is an old fashioned restaurant with, even on the busiest of days, little to no customers. However, this update is what we, the people, need. We don't need some random, barely used german restaurant, we need a shopping center full of fresh groceries, a car wash, and a gas station. That's practical. A random restaurant no one goes to is not. From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Car wash/7-11 Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 7:35:01 PM I strongly oppose the proposed demolition/construction. The area is already saturated with convenience stores and car washes. It would risk financial loss while destroying ongoing businesses at this location. Sent from my iPad From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:7/11 and car wash at Sunkist and Ball Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 8:09:10 PM To City of Anaheim, I have been a long time resident of Anaheim and absolutely treasure Jagerhaus Restaurant. I have recommended the wonderful food to my friends who also enjoyed this restaurant. We are losing too many family owned businesses. Please, please do not place another car wash and 7/11 there. Sincerely, Lynn Tamanaha From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:DEV2019-00042 Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 8:20:54 PM Dear Mr. Carvalho, Hello! I am writing to speak out against the proposed car wash and 7-eleven on the northeast corner of Ball Rd. and Sunkist. We don’t need another car wash. There is one on Ball Road just east of State College. There is another one at Lincoln and Sunkist. And they are building another one on State College across from the Northgate Market where the Sizzler used to be a long time ago. The businesses that are already at Ball and Sunkist are important to the local community. Brian Bogucki Sent from my iPhone From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc:Planning Commission; Stephen Faessel Subject:DEV2019-00042 Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 10:13:27 PM To whom it may concern, Im a district 5 resident and want to to let the planning commission know that I do not agree with the car wash coming into place near ball and Sunkist. there is so many people loosing their jobs and by you approving the carwash there will be a lot of people without jobs as the business in the shopping center may not afford to relocate. For years I've been going to the panaderia, liquor store and the German restaurant. Plus, I use the Ball exit and its very dangerous because everyone seems to always be in a hurry and adding a carwash will only increase the traffic and it will be more dangerous for residents like me to get home. please put residents request first vs the owners interest of making money off of hurting the businesses there. Plus, that said cross street is very busy and dangerous. Stop the approval of the new development. it is not good for nearby residents either. I understand we are not Anaheim Hills but we the residents demand respect and for you to acknowledge our request. Thank you for your time and cooperation Rosa Felix From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:7-11 Ball and Sunkist Project Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 12:24:12 AM Hello, As a local resident that lives walking distance from where the 7-11 project is proposed, I want to express that I am against it. Many small businesses are on that lot and they should not be displaced. Also, we don't need a second gas station across the street, especially as we move towards more renewable energy. Thanks, E. Xiomara Hernandez Anaheim, CA 92806 From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Sunkist & Ball project Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 6:36:30 AM Hello Mr. Carvalho, We are long time Anahiem residents. We love our city. Our son went to Juarez Elementary, Sycamore Jr. High & is now at Anahiem High. Our city has too many convenience stores and car washes especially in the Ball/ State College/ Lincoln area. We don’t need another. We do need neighborhood stores and restaurants that keep our community character like the Jagerhouse & the bakery at Ball & Sunkist. We are opposed to this development project. Please do not approve it. Thank you, Germaine Neumann & Khoi Chau Anaheim 92805 Sent from my iPhone From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Subject:DEV2019-00042 Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 6:45:01 AM To whom it may concern and Wayne Carvalho, I am writing to inform you that I am in opposition of project DEV2019-00042. As a resident of , Anaheim, CA 92806, this project will directly affect my surrounding neighborhood. There is a 7/11 store less than .5 miles down the street from the proposed location and a gas station directly across the street. There is a new express car wash that is in the final stages of being built just down State College Blvd. WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER 7/11, GAS STATION, OR CAR WASH IN THIS VICINITY! All of the shops in the current center on the corner of Ball and Sunkist are locally owned. They are all members of our community and putting them out of business would be wrong. If this project is approved, WE WILL PROTEST and do everything in our power to make sure that the business does not survive. Please reconsider this project proposal and help preserve and protect locally owned businesses in your city. Disneyland already owns a huge portion of Anaheim. The last thing we need are more commercially owned businesses in the city of Anaheim. Again, I beg you to please stop this proposed project and think about the people, rather than the money. Thank you. Sincerely, Leah Ficeli From: To:Planning Commission; Wayne Carvalho Subject:DEV2019-00042 Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 6:55:25 AM Dear Wayne Carvalho and the planning commission team, I am writing this email to inform you of my opposition to Project DEV2019-00042. As a resident of the surrounding community, I can assure you that we do not need another 7/11, car wash, or gas station. There is a gas station directly across the street, with two more just down the road at Ball and State College. Within a 5 mile radius there are THIRTEEN 7/11 stores, NINETEEN gas stations, and TWELVE car washes! We do not need more of any of these. I can tell you that there is only one Jagerhaus and that all of the businesses within the current building are locally owned. I understand that the building is an eye sore, so rebuild it and make it bigger and better so that more locally owned businesses can open there. Whatever you decide to do with the location, just please reconsider making it another commercially owned entity. Save the local businesses whose owners are residents of your lovely city. Thank you for listening and I hope that you reconsider this project. Best Regards, Malone Santino From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Re: Proposed carwash Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 11:57:25 AM Mr. Carvalho I am a resident of the tract of homes at Ball Road and Sunkist Street, which is adjacent to the 2501-2525 E. Ball Road property. I am absolutely NOT in favor a a car wash at this location. I do agree that this entire AREA needs some help from the City of Anaheim, it is absolutely horrible the amount of trash and other debris that is constantly on the freeway onramps and the parkways. Nothing is being done to make this area any better and a Car Wash is absolutely not the answer. There is a car was already there ? Puddles Car Wash just a couple blocks away. There is an eyesore of a building that is vacant next to the AM/PM on the corner, that is what needs to be revamped and leased. I absolutely do not want to look out my bedroom window and see a CARWASH !!!! This is not acceptable in any way. Thank you, Terri Corcoran Anaheim, Ca. 92806 From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Re: Notice of Planning Commission Meeting - Wed. January 20, 2021 Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 12:53:20 PM Attachments:Letter to the City of Anaheim.docx Please see attached for upcoming Planning commission meeting on the 20th. Jim On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:07 PM Jim McDonald > wrote: Wayne; Please see attached letter ref: "2501 - 2525 East Ball Road Project" as provided for the upcoming Planning Commission Meeting on January 20, 2021. Thank you! Jim McDonald On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 4:47 PM Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> wrote: SEE ATTACHMENT NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, January 20, 2021 5PM January 11, 2021 Dear Planning Commission, This letter is in reference to the scheduled public hearing on January 20, 2021 regarding the 2501-2525 East Ball Road planned construction of a new 24-hour convenience market with gas sales and an express carwash with ancillary vacuums. We, Jim and Martha McDonald, are extremely unhappy and disappointed to hear of the plans to build a gas station directly behind our home. We reside in the house directly behind His Nibs located at 2501 East Ball Road. We have resided in this home for over 24 years. Within the last two years, we have invested a substantial amount money in replacing our rear block wall and several features inside our home with no intentions of moving in the near future. We were certainly not expecting that there would be changes to the property behind our home in the magnitude of what is currently proposed. These changes will most certainly impact the noise level, lighting and more important to us, value of our home. We take pride in the home we’ve built in the last 24 years. We moved here because we wanted to be close to family and live in a nice community. Our extended family members live within one to two miles of each other. Our four children attended the nearby schools and worked in the community. We understand that we are only one family, one member of the Anaheim community and one voice. The proposed plans to build a gas station and carwash to replace local small businesses that have been in our community for so many years, seem counter to the promotion of small local business which are the backbone of the community. Currently, there is an existing gas station on the corner of Sunkist and Ball, as well as three gas stations and a carwash on the next block on Ball and State College. It would be acceptable, if the developers invested in renovating the current business. One of the arguments presented by the developers in a prior community meeting was that the Ball road 57 serves as an entrance way to the City of Anaheim leading to Disneyland. The intent being to improve and beautify the off ramp and entrance in to the city. How is this accomplished by adding a carwash, gas station and convenience store? It makes more sense to improve and invest in the current property with the already viable seven plus businesses that exist, one of which is considered an Anaheim landmark and institution. These plans have created stress for our family and our neighbors. We realize we have a choice of staying and putting up with these changes or moving. Moving means selling our home that we love and have invested in time, effort and sweat equity, and accruing closing, selling and moving costs that quite frankly we were not expecting at this point in our lives. As members of the Anaheim community for over 24 years, we are asking that you please not approve these plans. Sincerely, Jim and Martha McDonald From: To:Wayne Carvalho Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 6:40:39 PM Dear Mr. Carvalho, I am a three-year resident of Anaheim and live in Sunkist Gardens on Sunkist and Winston. I am writing in regards to the petition to build yet another car wash and gas station on the NE corner of Sunkist and Ball. Our city is saturated with gas stations and car washes: one short block to the West every single corner has a gas station on it. It is totally unnecessary to add yet another noise making, traffic causing gas station.car wash/vacuum station on this relatively quiet corner. And let's not forget the businesses that have been in that plaza for around 40 years now. Yes, the plaza is tired and could use a facelift, but it does not need to be razed to the ground and yet another unnecessary, polluting, gas station be built. I am very much against this project and voice my strongest concerns that it not be approved. A concerned Anaheim citizen, Lisa Weber Anaheim, CA 92806, USA -- From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Save Jagerhaus German Restaurant Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 8:24:15 PM Mr. Carvalho, I am a property owner at Anaheim and I want to express my opposition to building a 7-Eleven, gas station, and/or car wash at the corner of Ball and Sunkist. There are many reasons that I oppose this suggested use of the Ball/Sunkist corner. 1) There is no need for a 7-Eleven to be built as there is already an existing convenience store in this center. Also there is a 7-Eleven not even one mile away to the west approaching State College Blvd. What is the purpose of opening yet another convenience store when there are so many in the area? 2) A gas station would also be a poor choice for a tenant. There is an Arco station already across the street. Also there are multiple gas stations not even a mile away at State College and Ball Road. What is the purpose of opening another gas station when clean power and electric cars are providing cleaner fuel choices. 3) A car wash is of little interest especially when there are multiple car washes less than a mile away on Ball Road and State College area. We prefer the Jagerhaus German restaurant as it is a nice walk from our house and it has served wonderful food for many years and should have the ability to stay and serve our neighborhood rather than eliminate an easy walk to restaurant. Please remember that these suggested types of retail establishments really don't serve the existing neighborhoods but are built as a convenience for commuters. We don't want any more traffic and noise to affect our neighborhood. Please don't turn the Ball/Sunkist corner into an ugly urbanized drive thru where good mom and pop businesses will be forced out. Respectfully, Donald Toy From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 10:20:14 PM We property owners deserve better than a duplicate car wash and 7-11. Surely there’s some other offer you’ve had for the property at Sunkist and Ball road. Is that the best anaheim can do? We are truly being given the worst of development ideas. The Jagerhaus at least offers some semblance of community, not just a loud pass-through business. Does Anaheim Hills have a car wash on every corner? Doubt it. This planning reminds me of what a previous council did years ago when “developing” Downtown Anaheim. It never came back. Maybe that is the plan. Sent from my iPhone From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Public Comment from Anaheim Resident Kathy Laderman r.e. DEV2019-00042 Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 11:26:01 AM Attachments:Public Comment from Anaheim Resident Kathy Laderman r.e. DEV2019-00042.pdf To: Wayne Carvalho, City of Anaheim Planning City of Anaheim Planning Commission Members From: Kathy Laderman, Anaheim resident and business owner Ref: Project Number DEV2019-00042 Planning Commission Members: I am a resident and homeowner at in Anaheim, three blocks away from the proposed project at 2501-2525 East Ball Road. As it has been described to us, I do not believe it will benefit our community and may, in fact, be detrimental to local businesses and our neighborhood. Some of my key concerns/questions regarding the proposal to raze the current businesses and build a 7-Eleven service station/convenience store and an express car wash: 1) What are the planned hours of the station? The carwash? • What affect will this have on crime and security in the area? • What measures will be in place to prevent parking in the area late at night? • What measures will be in place to prevent parking in the area overnight? 2) It looks in the online plans that the station canopies are high — how tall are they? • Are they installing high-powered LEDs? • What will the light pollution be? • What is the lighting plan? Will they be on 24/7? • What mitigating steps will they be taking to limit light pollution for neighboring residents, both in the houses and in the apartment across the street? 3) Will the carwash be full service or conveyor/unmanned? The architectural diagram is difficult for me to read in detail but it appears they are putting parking spaces behind the carwash — next to the wall and backing up to the houses — presumably for customers to vacuum their vehicles. • Has there been a sound study? • Does the sound study include the decibels from the vacuums? • Multiple vacuums being used at the same time? • What will prevent car wash customers from playing music loudly while they vacuum their cars? • Will the vacuums be on all night? Early in the morning? • What security will be in place to prevent customers — or non-customers — from parking in that area late at night? 4) Living three blocks away, I patronize the existing businesses — especially the Jagerhaus restaurant — by walking to them instead of driving. The businesses located on that corner are the only businesses in the area that are less than a mile from my home. Having attended Anaheim City Planner outreach events, it was my understanding that From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Save the Jagerhaus Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 10:53:37 AM I understand there are plans to develop a car wash and 7-11 on the present site of the landmark Jagerhaus restaurant, even though there are other 7-11s within a few blocks and a large number of car washes in Anaheim as well. The Jagerhaus is a unique landmark in Anaheim history. Any plans for the property must include plans to protect and preserve the Jagerhaus as a restaurant, a business, and a part of Anaheim's history and culture. The restaurant could be rebuilt or remodeled while preserving its place in Anaheim. The surrounding properties should also be respected and protected. LYN JENSEN Freelance Writer P. O. Box 8091 Anaheim, CA 92812 From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Wednesday, January 06, 2021 3:13:35 PM I am disheartened and surprised that you would even think of closing this restaurant. We only have 2 decent restaurants in E.Anaheim. This family oriented business is one of a kind. It is also very reasonably priced for those of us who are retired. It has been a landmark for over 40 years. We do not want or need another 7-11 store. There are already 13 of them available. We also do not need another gas station. There is one right across the street from Jagerhaus. This has been a treasure for over 40 years. It is a family oriented place that is still in business.. As a senior, this is very important to me. . We have at least 12 car washes very close to us. Who needs another one? Jagerhaus can accommodate large groups for wedding receptions, club meetings, large family groups and other organizations. There are no other restaurants in our area that can do this. Please do not disappoint many of us who truly love this restaurant. Barbara Tomey From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Stop 7-11 being built at Sunkist & Ball Road Date:Wednesday, January 06, 2021 5:23:08 PM Mr Carvalho, I am writing to oppose the planned 7-Eleven at Ball/Sunkist. I have been a resident on Hilda St for 6 years and I frequent the shops currently in the Plaza. During this pandemic many family owned businesses are trying to stay above water. As mentioned above I frequent the shops to help fellow family run businesses. I buy most of my daily needs at the liquor store like milk and other dairy products. One of my favorite restaurants is Jagerhaus German Restaurant. Ive been going there for 15 years. During the pandemic I order lunch and dinner to show my support for local culinary establishments. I do not mind paying more for to meals, even though I could fix meals at my house, I want to support the establishments during Covid 19 shutdowns. My business has been slightly effected by the stay at home orders because my business is an essential business. Having a corporation like 7-Eleven will ruin the community Im so proud to call home. Right now I know that buying from family owned businesses will help put money in their pockets not be sent back to a corporate office. The money that stays here is spent in the community to further progress the area. I would welcome a discussion to see what can be done to keep all the small businesses at the Plaza. Thanks Brad Campbell Sent from my iPhone From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc:planningcommisio@anaheim.net Subject:Anaheim Resident Against city plans Date:Wednesday, January 06, 2021 9:26:53 PM Dear Anaheim Planning Committee, My family has been a resident of Anaheim off Ball Rd and Sunkist for 20 + years and we have seen great expansion here in Anaheim. There has been positive growth, but also negative. One of which is the excess commercial gas stations that brings more traffic to Ball Rd. There are NINETEEN gas stations within 5 miles of us. Another 7/11 less than ONE MILE away. TWELVE car washes all within a couple minutes for us local residents. The only reason to put more traffic and another unneeded chain cooperation would be simply for selfish city profit that does not put the residents first. Not to mention all the small business that you would be shutting down and taking business from that have been here for many years off Ball Rd and Sunkist. These are family owned business that are trying to survive during this horrific economy and the struggles that have come with having a business during the pandemic, which you are well aware. Your job is to better the Anaheim Community, not to serve a million dollar cooperation. Please put your community’s needs first. Thank you, Franco Family From:Ted White To:Wayne Carvalho; Niki J. Wetzel; Elly Morris Subject:FW: Ball rd Project Date:Thursday, January 07, 2021 11:41:51 AM Attachments:img20210107 10380965.pdf Public Comment on the Ball/Sunkist project. Ted White Planning & Building Director | City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 714.765.5209 tedwhite@anaheim.net For information on any modified services during the declared Emergency Health Crisis, please click here or visit https://www.anaheim.net/5464/City-Hall-Services-During-Coronavirus. From: lucille.kring@kring.us <lucille.kring@kring.us> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 10:57 AM To: Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim.net> Subject: Ball rd Project Hi Ted, Can you share this letter with Wayne? Thank you for your New Year's wishes. Everything is very quiet and we are healthy. Same wishes to you and your family. Lucille From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Save Jagerhaus German Restaurant Sunkist Plaza Project Date:Thursday, January 07, 2021 8:32:48 PM Good Evening, It was brought to my attention that the city of Anaheim is considering constructing a 7-Eleven, Gas Station, or Carwash, replacing the current Sunkist Plaza. We DO NOT NEED another 7-Eleven nor a Gas Station/ Carwash. Anaheim should invest their money into paving the roads in the surrounding neighborhoods and installing cameras on Sunkist Street by the apartments (North and South). Residents drop off trash on the side of the street and are able to get away with it. They need to be held accountable for their actions. Dumping trash on the streets may result in affecting home values and giving the perception that these actions are okay. If Anaheim wants to do something in the Sunkist Plaza area, they should provide funds to give the plaza a "modern exterior facelift." Closing the Sunkist Plaza and replacing it with a big chain business will affect current business owners. We need to support Anaheim small businesses and should invest money into beautifying the city, removing unnecessary billboards, and reducing crime. Thank you. From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Subject:Sunkist & Ball Road project Date:Thursday, January 07, 2021 8:45:01 PM To whom it may concern: I learned about a project that the City of Anaheim is trying to implement in the corner of Sunkist & Ball Road. If your project is to add another liquor store or 7 Eleven or gas station or car wash, I respectfully say that I am in absolute disagreement. Many families live in the area and having these types of businesses does not attract the right people. I am a proud resident of Anaheim; I live steps away from the corner of Sunkist & Ball Road. The only decent stores in the plaza are the cleaners, flower shop, and Jagerhaus German Restaurant. If the City is looking into investing money in this corner (Sunkist & Ball), I would suggest having businesses that are more youth or family-oriented. Having another gas station? My family does not even feel safe to walk or jog around this corner already due to the liquor store and gas station. Having another 7-Eleven store? Not the best idea. The corner will become more dangerous. Having a car wash? Really; a car wash? We are close to the Anaheim Stadium and Honda Center, this corner should have other restaurants that the youth and family likes. Do not forget we have visitors from other parts of State, nation, and international. We need to protect our children; there are many schools close by. Kids need to be and feel safe in their neighborhood. I truly hope you would reconsider your project to something that will benefit our youth and neighborhood. Respectfully, Pablo Torres (homeowner) From: To:Planning Commission; Wayne Carvalho Subject:Fwd: Project Number DEV2019 –00042 Date:Thursday, January 07, 2021 10:00:35 PM Resending due to missing email ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: M. A. <> Date: Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:57 PM Subject: Project Number DEV2019 –00042 To: planningcommission@anaheim.ne <planningcommission@anaheim.ne>, wcarvalho@anaheim.net <wcarvalho@anaheim.net> To the Planning Commission Department and the City of Anaheim Planning Department. I do not know where people who support this live or what you care about & are familiar with, but us having lived in the city of Anaheim for over 50 years, and in this neighborhood for over 24 years... we are very familiar with the many negative situations that more convenient stores, especially a 7-Eleven, and a gas station, plus a car wash ... will bring to our neighborhood. The negative circumstances are enormous & countless. You can take a look at what happens constantly at other locations and the bad dirty & scary environment it creates— La Palma Avenue and East Street, just to name one location of so many. For the past 5 years, I have personally had to call the city of Anaheim and even Code Enforcment due to the enormous amount of trash gathered by the freeway off ramp at Ball Rd and Sunkist. With the crazy new plan, trash will be even worse than the trash that comes from the elementary schools on Sunkist St. However, trash is the least of the problems. Think logically about the opposite side of the land desired for such a project, think realistically that there are good family homes with very decent hard working people. Everything that is being considered will negatively affect many families & the children. The huge amount of negative will bring excess amounts of noise which will carry over and disturb the peace for so many families. Whoever encouraged the idea, needs to put themselves here & live here, to know how negative things will be. There will be chaos that will come from people playing in & with their cars, loud laughter, arguments and cursing no one should have to hear at any time & especially during hours when residents are in their homes relaxing. If this project is not stopped, we will certainly be looking at more crime and all the side effects to youths at elementary schools nearby. Everyone knows that these are all common and obvious side effect that can’t be ignored. M. Alvarez -- M. A. -- M. A. From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Corner of Sunkist and Ball Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 11:19:50 AM Hello — I am writing to express my family’s opinion about the proposed 7-Eleven Gas Station and express car wash to replace the strip mall on the corner of Ball Road and Sunkist.I have lived in the neighborhood since 1969 and have been appalled at most of the overgrowth in Anaheim. Beginning with the literal destruction of the historic downtown and limited preservation of historic buildings to building apartments , condos and homes on every available square inch (goodbye orange groves, space between homes etc) to now the proposal to add yet another 7- Eleven (really there is one less than a mile away on Ball Road right next to a car wash) and express car wash (one is opening where the Sizzler restaurant was on St. College Blvd (~3 miles) as well as the conversion to an express on Sunkist and Lincoln and the express wash in the Mobil station on the corner of B all and ST. College ). And gas station … there is one on every corner 1 mile away at ST. College and Ball as well as an Arco right across the street from the proposed new gas station. I am sure you are aware of all of that but I am concerned about the people who are serviced by and the business owners who have storefronts in the existing mall … liquor/convenience store, bakery, donut shop, flower shop, cleaners not to mention the family owned Jagerhaus restaurant . Obviously the owner of the property is not interested in fixing up and repairing the existing building but the small business owners have regular loyal customers who will have to find other places to fill their needs — granted some will use the 7- Eleven but our family will not … I urge you and the planning commission to not allow the tear down and build of the proposed gas station etc. Thank you for listening to a concerned citizen. Sincerely, Cynthia R. Smith Anaheim, CA 92806 From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc:"" Subject:Save Jagerhaus German Restaurant Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 11:49:44 AM Hello Wayne: Yes, I agree the strip mall [including HisNibs, deli, donut shop, and the other “mom & pop shops”] could use a new face lift as it shows it’s age…ok with that. However, please consider the density of all the other same business, 7-11’s, carwashes etc., that are in a one mile radius of the strip mall at Ball & Sunkist. Due to the adjacent freeway ingress/egress it’s already a busy, busy area and I personally would recommend to keep the mom & pops thriving in the neighborhood if at all economically possible including the Jagerhaus restaurant [best breakfast in Anaheim]. Thank you and the Planning commission for your consideration. C.L. Gillespie…Local Anaheim resident, 46 years. From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Wayne Carvalho Subject:New business at Sunkist & Ball Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 1:44:43 PM We do not need new businesses at the busy intersection of Ball & Sunkist. We have sufficient convenience markets, including 7-Elevens, and also gas stations right there and nearby. With so much traffic going on and off the 57 Freeway, things get congested enough and could lead to more accidents. Shvonne Stricklen From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Project Number DEV2019-00042 Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 7:06:22 PM Hello, I am a resident of Anaheim and have lived in this area for over 20 years. I object to the development of another 7- Eleven in this area. First, it is not necessary as their are plenty of express car wash, gas station, and 7-Eleven. Also, how can the city force closure of a family owned restaurant that has served the community for decades. This is a perfect example of corporate, wealthy developers and city ambitions stepping on small business owners. I urge you to rethink your development strategy and focus on development on land that is available or perhaps consider closing a big business, i.e. Target, push them out to build this unnecessary development. Thank you, Anabel Romero From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Project Number DEV2019-00042 Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 7:13:24 PM Attention: Wayne Carvalho I am a resident of the city Anaheim and the area where this project is projected to occur for 33 years and I strongly oppose this project to build another 7-Eleven, Car Wash, or Gas Station due to the fact that we have all these services in the areas and within a short distance that one can drive to if needed. We have for many years gone to the Liquor Store in that shopping center to buy needed essentials, have enjoyed a meal at the German Family Owned Restaurant, purchased flowers, etc. This is another example of corporate America pushing out local small businesses for their profit only. There are many other retailers that can be “pushed” out that are not small businesses such as Walmart, Target, Costco, etc but of course the City of Anaheim rather step on small businesses. Also, Mr. Carvalho you are not a resident Anaheim so of course you wouldn’t know the importance of these small businesses to our area. Please highly consider doing away with this project as our neighborhood is not wanting any of these services. Kindly, Janeth Delfin From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Project Number DEV2019-00042 Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 7:18:37 PM Good evening Mr. Carvalho, My name is Andrew Clough and I am a concerned resident of Anaheim regarding the potential development of Project Number DEV2019-00042. I've lived in this city for a large majority of my twenty year life and my grandmother owns the hair salon on the adjacent corner of this proposed project. I've seen and lived with these local residents, consumers, and business owners significantly longer than this project as been considered and the leadership like yourself has even held this position. The people of this town and region of the city are hardworking, taxpaying, law-abiding citizens who do not deserve to have their livelihoods and community ties stripped from them. The even deeper embarrassing component of this proposed project is the shear lack of need. The idea that we need a 20th gas station, 13th car wash, and 14th 7-Eleven within a five mile radius is disgusting and exploitative. The consumers of this town and section are overrun with corporations that steal jobs, exploit workers, and dilute our communities from hard-earned economic dollars. As someone who has graduated with a degree in economics, I would imagine a smart person like yourself understands the idea of group economics. By keeping dollars within the community, those same communities can climb the socioeconomic ladder and give greater growth to our communities than sending those dollars to companies worth billions of dollars. So I suggest on January, 20th, you and your leadership team should reach the conclusion that this project is not only a bad economic and social decision, but is going to leave behind and further set back a hard working community. The government should be in the job of working for the people not for corporations, and that should not be a controversial statement. Sincerely, Andrew Clough From: To:Wayne Carvalho Date:Friday, January 08, 2021 7:38:20 PM Attachments: Very sorry to hear that the city of Anaheim is even contemplating to further downgrade the city by allowing the site where the Jägerhaus restaurant (and other businesses) are located off Ball road to be removed to add a 7-11 and car wash. I can only say that I have been dining at the Jägerhaus since 1983, and consider it one of the highlights for both the city of Anaheim, and the Southern California area. No offense, but Anaheim does not need another car wash or 7-11 in the city, bottom line, who cares? Keep the establishments that mean something to the city, and that bring patrons into Anaheim to enjoy what other cities do not have. I can only say that I would never patronize a car wash or 7-11 at the site of the Jägerhaus, and I believe that many people, both within and outside of the city of Anaheim, would agree. This is in reference to project 2019-00042 detergents, etc..) and car wash ( detergents, additional traffic pollutants from cars constantly driving by along the walls of the residential homes. I may be missing other factors as well. -Potential increase in homelessness in that area due to 7 eleven store and gas station. Homeless people normally hang around these places for easy access to getting stuff from their checks or cashing it out at the 7 eleven stores and also bathroom access. Also they have access to people that get gas so pan handling is easier like the gas stations on ball and state college. I see them all the time asking people at the gas station. -Potentially drive out residents who will be impacted directly or indirectly from this proposal. From my perspective, I believe there are more Cons than Pros for this project and please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Also please feel free to share with me the additional Pros that you see from this proposal other than what I stated above. With these pros please compare it with current state versus future state so there is a visible comparison. I am interested in knowing what I could have overlooked so I can have a better understanding. I sincerely do not approve of this carwash development. It does not make any business sense and can damage the community for years to come. Thank you and have a wonderful weekend! Tri From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Cc:; Subject:Proposed Development at Sunkist/Ball (2501-2525 E. Ball Road) Date:Saturday, January 09, 2021 9:55:26 AM Dear Wayne and the Planning Commission, My wife, Rhonda, and I live at in Anaheim. We are very near to the intersection of Sunkist and Ball, where the proposed development has been communicated to us. We are opposed to the proposal for the following reasons: 1. The current lot houses several small businesses which we frequently use to meet our needs, including Jaeger Haus, New Look hairstyling, the cleaners, His Nibs store, the donut shop and even the shoe repair store before it went out of business. 2. Our understanding is that a car wash business is being considered to replace these businesses a. There is already a car wash business (Puddles) located less than a half mile away on Ball Road b. We use Puddles and won’t be using any new car wash coming to this property 3. There are two elementary schools located on Sunkist, and there is significant foot traffic at that intersection 4. There is significant traffic on Sunkist already. Frequently it is difficult and even dangerous to enter Sunkist by car from Whidby, meaning any new traffic coming to Sunkist/Ball would make it even more dangerous a. There is an apartment complex across the street (on Sunkist and opposite of Whidby), There is not enough parking at the apartments, so those tenants park in our neighborhood (which is a complaint for another time). Those people jaywalk across Sunkist to exit and enter their cars parked on Whidby, meaning their lives would be more endangered with this proposal. 5. We don’t need another 7/11 either. There are already 13 in a 5 mile radius, including 1 less than a mile away and right next to Puddles car wash, believe it or not. 6) There is a gas station right across the street, which we use exclusively, due to its low prices. In fact, I know several people who do business at that Arco from outside the neighborhood due to its low pricing. We won’t be giving a new gas station any of our business. To sum this all up: nobody in the area wants a car wash, 7/11 or a gas station to be put at that location. There must be better choices that can benefit those Anaheim residents that live in the area. In my humble opinion, this is what we pay the planning commission to do: come up with the best plan for the neighboring community. Will you please do that for us? Thank you, Wayne and Committee, for considering our input. Rob and Rhonda White This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended addressee (or authorized to receive for the intended addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply and delete the message. To the extent contractual confidentiality obligations exist, this message and all information transmitted with it are designated "Confidential". From: To:Planning Commission; Wayne Carvalho Subject:Ball & Sunkist, Project Number DEV2019-00042 Date:Sunday, January 10, 2021 12:46:26 PM Hello, we live right around the corner from the mall on the corner of Sunkist and Ball and the last thing we need is another carwash, 7 eleven, or gas station when there are others literally 2,000 feet down Ball Rd. What we do need are the current small family owned businesses that our neighborhood cherishes and frequents often. Thank you, Dave & Monica Gunn and family From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Project Number DEV2019-00042 Public Comment Lockwood Date:Thursday, January 07, 2021 6:38:50 PM Attachments:image.png image.png image.png image.png Posted Notice.pdf 7-Elevens.pdf Gas Stations.pdf Carwashes.pdf Ref: Project Number DEV2019-00042 Wayne, Below are my official reasons why I oppose the intended development on the corner of Ball and Sunkist. Please submit this to the Planning Commission for review. Please see attachments for reference. Thank you in advance And all the work that you do for our great city. Todd Lockwood Anaheim, CA 92806 (714)535-6720 Reasons I oppose We don't need another 7-Eleven, within a 5-mile radius, there are thirteen 7-Elevens, and one is not even a mile away. We don’t need another gas station, within a 5-mile radius; there are nineteen gas stations and one right across the street We don’t need another car wash, within a 5-mile radius there are twelve car wash two new Rapid Express on State Collage just a couple of miles away. Traffic; we already have a problem with traffic on Ball road and Sunkist. The proposed project would increase the traffic considerably. Whidby Lane is two blocks up from Ball road and it is dangerous to exit because it's hard to see cars coming from Ball Road. More traffic would increase this dangerous condition. Noise; the location right next to a Track of houses with only a short brick wall separation. There is a considerable amount of noise that the gas station and carwash produce during the day and even at night when there closed. In the middle of the night, trucks refilling underground fuel tanks and pumping out the wastewater from the carwash. Pollution; The track of houses next door will have increased Pollution from the car emission, gas fumes and toxic wastewater. Entrance to the Anaheim; Ball Road at the 57fwy is a Main artery to the Anaheim Resort district, this property should have something pleasant to Anaheim. Posted Notice; The posted notice on the site blew away shortly after it was installed. Also, the email address for Wayne Carvalho was incorrect, which reads "Wcarvalho@Anaheim.com" not .net as it should have. I believe that the public has not been correctly notified, and if they tried to send an email to Wayne, it would have been received. I’m quite sure you don’t live near this corner or you would be well aware that getting out of local side streets in the morning and evening is a hassle. Adding a second left-turn lane to go West on Ball from Sunkist helped, but having people turn into that center from the left-turn lane off Sunkist is going to be a problem. From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Cc:Stephen Faessel Subject:Reasons against Proposed 7/11, Gas Station and Express Car Wash at Ball and Sunkist Date:Saturday, January 09, 2021 8:45:19 PM Attachments:Leaking underground storage tanks.pdf Wayne and planning commission, 1. Not another 7-Eleven, Gas Station and Car Wash You probably are already well aware that the neighborhoods around this proposed development are opposed to it. You KNOW we don’t need another 7-Eleven or car wash (one of each is a block away), gas station (one is across the street) and there are multiples of these same businesses within a five- mile radius. None of that seemed to matter when a meeting was held for this last year but I am hoping for the Planning Commission to come to their senses. 2. Traffic issues Along with tying up left turns onto Ball, before Covid-19 it was nearly impossible to make a left-turn from nearby side streets to go south on Sunkist during rush hours. Even with reduced traffic due to the pandemic it is challenging. Countless times I’ve ended up turning right, going a few blocks and turning back or continuing out-of-my way to get the 57 from Lincoln rather than Ball because I can’t safely turn left with the traffic. The additional traffic will just exacerbate the problem at all times. In the evening, cars exiting the 57 headed west and from the existing businesses entering or crossing the right-hand turn lane for Sunkist slows traffic. Now it appears it will get substantially worse with entry and exit from these high-usage businesses. Inconvenience from one of the proposed usages might be livable. All three is outrageous. 3. Noise, homelessness and safety The car wash may be closed at night but a gas station and 7-Eleven generate substantially more noise than a typical retail center. Currently the 7-Eleven and gas station area at State College and La Palma attracts the homeless and panhandling and what could be drug-dealing. There is no reason to believe that wouldn’t occur here as well. I just wish this usage was being proposed in the developer’s neighborhood – although I suspect Beverly Hills wouldn’t be entertaining it as Anaheim is. Thank heavens I don’t live on the street backing up to this site but the homes that do will have a reduction in value. 4. Pollution, immediate and long-term Trash, oil, gasoline and underground tank leakage. No to all. Should not even have to spell this out for you but we already have underground gasoline tanks on the other corner. Enough! Of course, the new car wash recycle system and gas station tanks will probably be ok for awhile. They will leak eventually if not immediately. Leaking underground storage tanks pollute land and water. Anyone even checking out all the existing gas station tanks in Anaheim? Attaching an article from the Sierra Club for you. 5. Jagerhaus and existing businesses While not a major consideration for me personally, Jagerhaus is a beloved local establishment. It is representative of Anaheim’s early beginnings with German settlers. This corner should remain restaurants, shops and office. PLEASE don’t allow the proposed usage for this corner!!! Carole Lipinski Anaheim, CA 92806 Charts Fact Sheets and Bibliographies The subsequent sections contain the following information: 1. National Charts Chart One: Backlog of Cleanups at Leaking UST Sites Chart Two: Percentage of Population that Relies on Groundwater for Drinking Water Chart Three: Percentage of Leaking UST Sites Cleaned Up Chart Four: Top States with Lowest Percentage of Sites Cleaned Up Chart Five: State UST Funding, By Rank Chart Six: State UST Funding, By State Chart Seven: State Considers Leaking USTs a Threat to Groundwater Quality 2. Major Karst Aquifers in the United States: Karst aquifers provide 40 percent of the nation’s drinking water that is derived from groundwater. However, this types of aquifers can also be extremely vulnerable to contamination. 3. State Underground Storage Tank Fact Sheets: A description of state UST programs, use of groundwater and contamination of groundwater by related-UST pollutants. 4. Bibliographies National Report State Fact Sheets Major Karst Aquifers in the United States Karst regions contain aquifers that can provide plentiful supplies of groundwater. However, many karst aquifers are also vulnerable to contamination because contamination can move rapidly through the ground and throughout the aquifer. Karst regions comprise 20 percent of our nation’s land surface area and provide 40 percent of the nation’s groundwater that is used for drinking water. Source: U.S. Geological Survey, Karst (Available at http://water.usgs.gov/ogw/karst/) (Last checked on April 8, 2005). State & District Underground Storage Tank Fact Sheets 1. Alaska 14. Iowa 27. Ohio 2. Alabama 15. Kansas 28. Pennsylvania 3. Arkansas 16. Kentucky 29. Rhode Island 4. Arizona 17. Maine 30. South Carolina 5. California 18. Maryland 31. South Dakota 6. Colorado 19. Massachusetts 32. Tennessee 7. Connecticut 20. Michigan 33. Texas 8. District of Columbia 21. Minnesota 34. Virginia 9. Delaware 22. Missouri 35. Vermont 10. Florida 23. Montana 36. Washington 11. Georgia 24. North Carolina 37. Wisconsin 12. Illinois 25. Nebraska 38. West Virginia 13. Indiana 26. New Hampshire Bibliography for National Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report The following citations describe the material used to produce the national report on the status of leaking underground storage tanks. 1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profiles (various) 2. Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials, 2003 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey Results (2003) (Tables 1, 2, 3, and 5) 3. Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials, 2004 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey Results (2004) (Tables 1, 2, 3, and 5) 4. Audrey Grasso, Voicesnews.com, EPA Considers Fine for Newton Oil Spill (2005) 5. Beth Daley, Globe Staff, Report Cites Trace Chemicals in Water (Dec. 16, 2004) 6. City of Santa Monica, Economic & Demographic Profile: Population & Race (2005) 7. Congressional Research Service, MTBE in Gasoline: Clean Air and Drinking Water Issues 98-290 ENR (2004) 8. Dan Benson, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Homeowners File Suit Against Two Firms (Apr. 2, 2000) 9. David Danelski and Jennifer Bowles, Troubled Waters Regulators Struggle to Deal with Fuel Leaks from an Inland Tank Farm (Aug. 12, 2001) 10. Eric Fleichauer, The Decatur Daily News, Parent Wonder If Girl’s Leukemia Linked to Gasoline (2005) 11. Enric Volante, Arizona Daily Star, Leaking Fuel Tanks Foul Soil, Water under Our Feet (Mar. 28, 2004) 12. Environmental Defense, Scorecard.org (2005) (various chemical profiles) 13. Environmental Protection Agency, 40 C.F.R. §§ 141.2 (2004) 14. Environmental Protection Agency, Cleaning Up the Nation’s Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends, EPA 542-R-04-015 (2004) 15. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, Impact of EPA and State Drinking Water Capacity Development Efforts Uncertain, Rpt. No. 2003-P-00018 (2003) 16. Environmental Protection Agency, FY 1996-2004 Semi-Annual End-of-the-Year Reports (1996- 2004) 17. Environmental Protection Agency, National Water Quality Inventory 2000, EPA-841-R-02-001 (2000) 18. Environmental Protection Agency, Opportunity for Targeted Public Health protection through the Underground Storage Tank and Source Water Protection Programs (2004) 19. EPA, Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed Ground Water Rule (2000) 20. Environmental Protection Agency, Report to Congress on a Compliance Plan for the Underground Storage Tank Program, EPA 510-R-00-001 (2000) 21. Environmental Protection Agency, Safe Drinking Water Act, Sec. 1429 Rpt. for Cong. (1999) 22. Environmental Protection Agency, Underground Storage Tanks, Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Trust Fund (Available at http://www.epa.gov/swerust1/ltffacts.htm) 23. Environmental Working Ground, Like Oil & Water, As Congress Considers Legal Immunity for Oil Companies More Communities Go To Court Over MTBE (2005) 24. Erik Olson, Senior Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality of the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives (2005) 25. G. William Page and Harvey Rabinowitz, Groundwater Contamination: Its Effects on Property Values and Cities, 59 J. Am. Planning Assoc. 473 (1993) 26. Hal Bernton, Seattle Times, Gasoline Additive Found in Ground Water at 30 sites, Contamination Risk High in Area; Report says (Oct. 11, 2000) 27. Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, The Effectiveness of Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Programs, 108th Cong, 1st Sess. (2003) 28. Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Land Quality, MTBE Contamination, Roselawn Indiana (Updated 2004) 29. Jake Thompson, Fuel Additive Found in Municipal Wells, Small Amounts of MTBE, Used to Help Gasoline Burn Cleaner, Have Been Detected in a Few Towns in Nebraska and Iowa (Nov. 30, 2003) 30. James Fuller, Daily Herald, How Leaking Tanks Underground Have Affected Barrington (Aug. 20, 2002) 31. Jan Barry, The Record, DEP Widens Underground Tank Checks; Aim is to Guard Aquifers From Gasoline Contamination (Aug. 19, 2004) 32. Jim Doyle and Susan Sward, San Francisco Chronicle, MTBE Leaks A Ticking Bomb Gas Additive Taints Water Nationwide (Dec. 14, 1998) 33. Knight-Tribune News Service, Florida Times Union, Diesel Spills Pose Threat to State’s Drinking Water (Mar. 31, 1998) 34. Letter from Christine Todd Whiteman, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency to The Honorable W.J. “Billy” Tauzin, Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce (May 7, 2003) 35. Lisa Kozleski, Gas Additive MTBE Found in More Wells, All are Within 1,400 Feet of an Exxon Station on Richland Township-Quakertown Border (May 17, 2001) 36. Lisa Kozleski, Two More Wells Tainted by MTBE Milford Twp. Spill Was Found in December as Owner Put in New Tanks (Feb. 8, 2001) 37. Martha Bisacchi, Post-Tribune, New Well Plan May Solve Contamination at School, Morocco’s MtBE-Tainted Water Would be Filtered, New Well Dug if Approved (Dec. 8, 2004) 38. Martha Bisacchi, Post-Tribune, School Water Unsafe To Drink; The U.S. EPA Told Lincoln Elementary Students And Staff The Water Is Contaminated With A Gasoline Additive (Apr. 4, 2002) 39. Mary Bender, The Press-Enterprise, Eastvale: The District Will Have to Ensure Toxic Remnants From Dairies Don’t Harm Students (2005) 40. Melissa Widner, The Rensselaer Republican, MTBE Found in Four DeMotte Business Wells (2005) 41. Meredith Goad, Portland Press Herald, One Fouled Well Sets Off Search; The DEP’s Hunt for the Limits of Contamination Spreads Ever Outward in Tenants Harbor (Jul. 11, 1004) 42. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, RPD Operational Memo. #2 (2004) 43. New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, 44 L.U.S.T.LINE (July 2003) 44. New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, 45 L.U.S.T.LINE (Oct. 2003) 45. New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, 47 L.U.S.T.LINE (June 2004) 46. New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, Summary Report on a Survey of State Experiences with MtBE and Other Oxygenate Contamination at LUST Sites (2003) 47. New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, The Complied Results of the Survey of State Experiences with MtBE and Other Oxygenate Contamination at LUST Sites (2003) 48. Pat Brennan, Orange County Register, Prosecutors Allege MTBE Conspiracy: Reports Showed Problems, but Oil Distributors Allegedly Looked the Other Way. Arco Denies Allegations (Oct. 20, 2000) 49. Rebecca Tsaros Dickson, Concord Monitor, Bill Would Ban MtBE in State; Plan Joins Ban, Gas Reformulation Rules (Mar. 27, 2004) 50. Richard Cockle, The Oregonian, DEQ Will Clean Up Leaking Fuel Tanks (Oct. 12, 2000) 51. Rob O’Dell, North County Times, Buried Fuel Tanks Raise a Host of Concerns in VUSD (2005) 52. Robert Simons, Settlement of an Oil Pipeline Leak with Contaminated Residential Property: A Case Study 24 Real Estate Issues 46 (1999) (See also, Robert Simons, et al., The Effect of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Residential Property Value, 14 J. Real Estate Res. 129 (1999) and Robert Simons, et al., The Effects of LUSTS from Gas Stations on Residential and Commercial Property that is Actually Contaminated, The Appraisal J. (April, 1999) 53. Ted Shelsby, The Sun, Hartford Considers Freeze on New Gas Stations; Gasoline Additive MTBE Found in Wells Near Exxon (July 11, 2004) 54. Ted Shelsby, The Sun, Traces of MTBE Found at More Harford Sites (Oct. 6, 2004) 55. Terry Hillig, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, City Wants Oil Companies to Pay for Contamination Village Runs Plant Solely to Treat Water From Tainted Well; Use of Additive is Now Illegal (Jul. 30, 2001) 56. The Sun, Harford Residents Ask Legislatures to End MTBE Use (Jan. 17, 2005) 57. The Sun, New Rules to Prevent MTBE Leaks Will Go Into Effect Today (Jan 26, 2005) 58. Tom Walsh, The Patriot Ledger, U.S. Geological Survey Maps Seeping Underground Storage Tanks, Well Water in 15 Towns at Risk from Toxic Leaks (Apr. 8, 2000) 59. United States Census Bureau, Annual Estimate of Population for the United States (2004) 60. United States Code of Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. Part 280 (2003) 61. United States Code, 42 U.S.C. section 6991 et seq. (2002) 62. United States Department of Treasury, The Budget for Fiscal Year 2006, Appendix for the Environmental Protection Agency (2005) 63. United States General Accounting Office, Availability of Insurance for Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks, GAO/T-RCED-88-9 (1987) 64. United States General Accounting Office, Drinking Water, Stronger Efforts Essential for Small Communities to Comply with Standards, GAO/RECD-94-40 (1994) 65. United States General Accounting Office, Drinking Water, Information on Quality of Wter Found at Community Water Systems and Private Wells, GAO/RECD-97-123 (1997) 66. United States General Accounting Office, Improved Inspections and Enforcement Would Ensure Safer Underground Storage Tanks, GAO-01-464 (2001) 67. United States General Accounting Office, Safe Drinking Water Act, Progress and Future Challenges in Implementing the 1996 Amendments, GAO/RECD-99-31 (1999) 68. United States General Accounting Office, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, MTBE Contamination From Underground Storage Tanks (2002) 69. United States General Accounting Office, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Recommendations for Improving the Underground Storage Tank Program, GAO-030529T (2003) 70. United States General Accounting Office, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Superfund, Toxics, Risk and Waste Management, Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate, Improved Inspections and Enforcement Would Ensure Safer Underground Storage Tanks, GAO- 02-712T (2002) 71. United States Geological Survey, A National Survey of Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether and other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking-Water Sources: Results of the Random Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Reports 02-4079 (2003) 72. United States Geological Survey, MTBE and Other Volatile Organic Compounds-New Finding and Implication on the Quality of Source Waters Used for Drinking-Water Supplies, FS-105-01 (2001) 73. United States Geological Survey, Natural and Human Factors Affecting Shallow Water Quality in Surficial Aquifers in the Connecticut, Housatonic, and Thames River Basins, Water-Resources Report 98-4042 (1998) 74. United States Geological Survey, Occurrence and Distribution of Methyl tert-Butyl Ether and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions of the United States, 1993-98, Water-Resources Investigation Report 00-4228 (2001) 75. United States Geological Survey, VOCs in Shallow Groundwater in New Residential/Commercial Areas of the United States, 38 Environ. Sci. Technol. 5327 (2004) 76. William Carlsen, The San Diego Tribune, Cover-up Charged on Gas Additive Peril, Court Papers say U.S. Knew of Water-Supply Threat 15 Years Ago (Aug. 20, 2001) 77. William Speed Weed, Gas Leak, 90 Current Science 6 (2005) Bibliography for State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fact Sheets The following citations describe the material used to produce the individual state-by-state fact sheets contained in this document. Figures on the number and percent of a state’s population that uses groundwater for drinking water comes from: Environmental Protection Agency, Safe Drinking Water Act, Sec. 1429 Rpt. for Cong. (1999) Each state’s UST program figures on the average cost per cleanup, number of agency fund staff, types of tanks covered, funding sources, approximate current balance, outstanding claims, expiration of funding mechanisms and program and funding or legislative information comes from: Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials, 2003 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey Results (2003) (Tables 1, 2, 3, and 5) or Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials, 2004 State Financial Assurance Funds Survey Results (2004) (Tables 1, 2, 3, and 5), unless otherwise noted Figures on each state’s population comes from: United States Census Bureau, Annual Estimate of Population for the United States (2004) Figures on the number of backlogged cleanups, state rank for the number of backlogged cleanups, the percent of sites cleaned up, percent above national average, total number of sties in history of the program, total number of active tanks, and total number of emergency cleanups taken from: Environmental Protection Agency, FY 2004 Semi-Annual End-of-the-Year Report (2004) The following citations list sources that the document generally uses to describe the Groundwater and UST Contamination sections of the state-by-state fact sheets. ALASKA 1. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Alaska’s Final 2002/2003 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (2003) 2. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Underground Storage Tank Revolving Loan Fund Annual Report: Fiscal Year 2004 (2005) ALABAMA 1. Alabama Department of Environmental Management, Alabama 2000 Water Quality Report to Congress (2000) 2. Alabama Department of Environmental Management, 2000 Water Quality Report to Congress 305(b) Report (2000) 3. Alabama Department of Environmental Management, Alabama’s 2004 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring & Assessment Report (2004) ARKANSAS 1. Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality, 2002 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (2002) ARIZONA 1. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Draft Arizona’s Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Listing Report (2004) 2. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Impacts to Groundwater Resources in Arizona From Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTS) (2003) 3. Arizona Office of the Auditor General, Performance Audit of the Department of Environmental Quality: Waste Programs Division (2004) 4. United States Geological Survey, Water-Use Trends in the Desert Southwest—1950-2000 (2004) CALIFORNIA 1. Department of Water Resources, California’s Groundwater-Bulletin 118, Update 2003 (2003) 2. Department of Water Resources, Water Facts: Numbering Water Wells in California (2000) 3. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in California’s Economic Vitality (2004) 4. State Water Resources Control Board, 2002 California 305(b) Report on Water Quality (2003) COLORADO 1. Department of Public Health and Environment, Status of Water Quality in Colorado: 2002 (2002) CONNECTICUT 1. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, 2004 Water Quality Report to Congress (2004) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1. 20 DCMR Chapt. 56 (2004) 2. Department of Health, District of Columbia, Environmental Health Administration, DC Underground Storage Tanks Management Website (2005) 3. Department of Health, District of Columbia, LUST Cases for FOIA (April, 2004) (on file with author) 4. Correspondence from District of Columbia Department of Health to Linda Fennell, Environmental Justice Organizer for the Sierra Club regarding the former Shell retail facility at 4107 Alabama Ave., SE, LUST Case ID 90035 5. Environmental Protection Agency, Chillum Gasoline Release Website 6. Department of Health, District of Columbia, Press Release: Department of Health Releases Environmental Test Results Related to Gasoline Storage Tank Spill in Fort Davis Community (2001) 7. Environmental Protection Agency, Fact Sheet: EPA Issues Order to Chevron Inc. (2002) 8. DELAWARE 1. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, 2002 Watershed Assessment Report (305(b)) (2002) 2. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, First Report to the Governor and the General Assembly Regarding Progress of the Delaware Source Water Assessment and Protection Program (2004) 3. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control and Delaware Health and Social Services, The Impact of Known and Suspected Contaminant Sources on Select Public Drinking Water Supplies in Delaware (2002) FLORIDA 1. Department of Environmental Protection, 2000 Florida Water Quality Assessment: 305(b) Report (2000) 2. Department of Environmental Protection, Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: 2004 305(b) Report and 303(d) List Update (2004) GEORGIA 1. Department of Natural Resources, Water Quality in Georgia 2000-2001 (2001) IOWA 1. Department of Natural Resources, Iowa’s Groundwater Basics: Groundwater Use in Iowa (2003) 2. Department of Natural Resources, Methyl tertiary-Butyl Ether (MTBE) Occurrence in Iowa (2000) 3. Department of Natural Resources, Water Quality in Iowa During 1998 and 1999 (2000) ILLINOIS 1. Department of Natural Resources, Critical Trends Assessment Project Summary Report (1994) 2. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Illinois Groundwater Protection Program: Biennial Comprehensive Status and Self-Assessment Report (2004) 3. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Illinois Water Quality Report 2004 (2004) 4. Illinois Water Supply, Illinois State Water Survey (2005) INDIANA 1. Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Indiana Integrated Water Monitoring and Assessment Report 2002 (2002) 2. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in Indiana’s Economic Vitality (2004) KANSAS 1. Kansas Department of Health and Environment, 2004 Kansas Water Quality Assessment (305(b) Report) (2004) 2. Kansas Department of Health and Environment, KDHE Responds to Concerns Over MTBE (2000) 3. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in Kansas’s Economic Vitality (2004) KENTUCKY 1. Kentucky Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet, 2004 Kentucky Report to Congress on Water Quality (2004) MARYLAND 1. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 2000 Maryland Section 305(b) Water Quality Report (2000) MASSACHUSETTS 1. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Industrial Waste Report No. 18 (2002) 2. National Groundwater Association, Ground Water’s Role in Massachusetts’s Economic Vitality (2004) 3. Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, MTBE in Ground and Surface Waters of the NESCAUM Region Attachment II (1999) 4. Paul Squillace, et al., United States Geological Survey, A Preliminary Assessment of the Occurrence and Possible Sources of MTBE in Ground Water of the United States, 1993-94, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-456 (1995) 5. Tom Walsh, The Patriot Ledger, U.S. Geological Survey Maps Seeping Underground Gas Tanks, Well Water in 15 Towns At Risk of Toxic Leaks (2000). 6. United States Geological Survey, Public-Water Supplies in Massachusetts and Rhode Island: Investigation of Processes Affecting Source-Water Quality (1997) MAINE 1. Maine Department of Environmental Protection, 2002 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (2002) 2. Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Historical Oil Contamination Travel Distances in Ground Water at Sensitive Geological Sites in Maine (2002) 3. Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Siting of New Underground Oil & Hazardous Substance Storage Facilities in Relation to Drinking Water Supplies & Significant Ground Water Resources (2001) MICHIGAN 1. Institute of Water Research, Michigan State University, Drinking Water in Michigan—Where do we get it? (Updated 2003) 2. Institute of Water Research, Michigan State University, Michigan’s Drinking Water Resources (Updated 2003) 3. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, 2002 Michigan DEQ Environmental Quality Report (2002) 4. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Remediation and Redevelopment Division, Site Funding Needs Environment and Redevelopment (2003) 5. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, RPD Operational Memo. #2 (2004) 6. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Withdrawals for major Water Uses in Michigan 2001 (2001) MINNESOTA 1. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Profile: Groundwater (2004) 2. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Baseline Water Quality of Minnesota’s Principal Aquifers –Region 6, Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (1999) 3. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) In Minnesota’s Ground Water (1999) MISSOURI 1. Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Missouri Water Quality Report 2002 (2002) 2. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in Missouri’s Economic Vitality (2004) MONTANA 1. Montana Natural Resource Information System, Montana Ground Water Atlas (no date given) NEBRASKA 1. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in Nebraska’s Economic Vitality (2004) 2. Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, 2004 Nebraska Groundwater Quality Monitoring Report (2004) NEW HAMPSHIRE 1. New Hampshire Attorney General, New Hampshire Attorney General Responses to Questions on MTBE (2003) 2. New Hampshire, 2000 Section 305(b) Water Quality Report (2000) 3. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, 2004 Annual Report (2004) 4. Peter W. Heed, New Hampshire Attorney General, New Hampshire Sues Major Oil Companies Over MTBE Pollution (2003) NEW JERSEY 1. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey 2004 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (305(b) and 303(d)) (2004) 2. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey Source Water Assessment Program Statewide Summary (2004) NEW MEXICO 1. New Mexico Environment Department, Source Water Assessment and Protection Program (2000) 2. New Mexico Environment Department, Water Quality and water Pollution Control in New Mexico ~ 2000 (2000) NEW YORK 1. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, New York State Water Quality 2000 (2000) 2. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, New York State Water Quality 2002 (2002) 3. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Remedial Programs Annual Report for State Fiscal Year 2002-03 (2003) NORTH CAROLINA 1. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, [Draft] North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2004 Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Report) (2004) OHIO 1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 2002 305(b) Report Ohio’s Ground Water Quality (2003). 2. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Ohio’s Ground Water Quality 2000 305(b) Report (2000) 3. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Susceptibility Analysis and Proposed Confidence Report Language for the City of Cincinnati-Bolton Wellfield (2004) 4. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Susceptibility Analysis and Proposed Consumer Confidence Report Language for the City of Dayton Miami and Mad River Wellfields (2004) 5. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Susceptibility Analysis and Proposed Consumer Confidence Report Language for the City of Fairfield (2004) 6. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Susceptibility Analysis and Proposed Consumer Confidence Report Language for the City of Hamilton North and South Wellfields (2004) PENNSYLVANIA 1. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, 2002 Pennsylvania Water Quality Assessment 305(b) Report (2002) 2. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Insurance Department, 2003 Annual Report Pennsylvania Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Fund (2003) RHODE ISLAND 1. State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, 2004 Section 305(b) State of the State’s Waters Report (2004) SOUTH CAROLINA 1. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, State of South Carolina Integrated Report for 2004 Part II: Assessment and Reporting (2004) 2. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, South Carolina Risk- Based Corrective Action for Petroleum Releases (2001) 3. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Underground Storage Tank Quarterly Financial Report July 1, 2004 – December 31, 2004 Second Quarter (2004) SOUTH DAKOTA 1. South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources, The 2000 South Dakota Report to Congress 305(b) Water Quality Assessment (2000) 2. South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources, The 2002 South Dakota Report to Congress 305(b) Water Quality Assessment (2002) TENNESSEE 1. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in Tennessee’s Economic Vitality (2004) 2. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, The Tennessee Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Advisory Committee on The Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund (2004). 3. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Important Information About the 2004 UST Law Change (2004) 4. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Tennessee Ground Water 305b Water Quality Report (2002) TEXAS 1. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in Texas’s Economic Vitality (2004) 2. Texas Groundwater Protection Committee, Joint Groundwater Monitoring and Contamination Report – 2003, SRF-056/03 (2004) 3. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, DRAFT 2002 Texas Water Quality Inventory-Groundwater Assessment (2002) 4. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, Texas Water Quality Inventory, 2000 Volume 1 (2002) VIRGINIA 1. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in Virginia’s Economic Vitality (2004) 2. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, 2002 305(b) Water Quality Assessment Report (2004) 3. Virginia Department of Health, Virginia Source Water Assessment Program (1999) VERMONT 1. Vermont Petroleum Cleanup Fund Advisory Committee, Sixteenth Annual Report on the Status of the Petroleum Cleanup Fund (2004) 2. Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, State of Vermont 2004 Water Quality Assessment Report (305B Report) (2004) WASHINGTON 1. James Hagengruber, spokesman-Review, BNSF Shutters Depot, County Wants Leaky Containment Barriers Fixed (Feb. 25, 2005) 2. Karen Dorn Steele, The Spokesman-Review, Departed Industries Left Land Poisoned (Mar. 6, 2005) 3. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in Washington’s Economic Vitality (2004) 4. Revised Code of Washington, Sections 90.76.005 and 90.76.040 (2004) 5. Washington Administrative Code, Sections 173-360-500 and 510. 6. Washington Department of Ecology, 2000 Washington State Water Quality Assessment Section 305(b) Report (2000) 7. Washington Department of Ecology, Occurrence of Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MTBE) in Groundwater at Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites in Washington (2000) 8. Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Health, Report on Groundwater Contamination that Affects Drinking Water in Washington State (1999) WEST VIRGINIA 1. National Ground Water Association, Ground Water’s Role in West Virginia’s Economic Vitality (2004) 2. State of West Virginia Offices of the Insurance Commissioner, May 2004 West Virginia Informational Letter No. 147 (2004) 3. West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Groundwater Programs and Activities Biennial Report to the West Virginia 2004 Legislature (2004) WISCONSIN 1. Jim Krohelski, United States Geological Survey, Uncovering the Quality and Quantity Issues of Wisconsin’s Buried Treasure (2001) 2. United States Geological Survey, Water Use in Wisconsin, 2000, Open File Report 02-356 (2000) 3. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2004 Groundwater Coordinating Council Report to the Legislature (2004) 4. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress 2002 (2002) 5. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress 2004 (2004) From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:7-Eleven, Gas Station & Express Car Wash on the corner of Sunkist/ Ball Rd in Anaheim Date:Monday, January 04, 2021 3:43:04 PM Dear Wayne Carvalho, I'm a resident in the neighborhood behind the corner of Sunkist and Ball Rd. I don't want this construction of the Express car wash, gas station and 7-Eleven to be built. It would increase the already overwhelming traffic congestion at this intersection. Before Covid the traffic getting on and off the 57 freeway would be backed up in both directions. Cars getting on the freeway from Sunkist in the morning are backed up to Wagner a good 1/2 mile away. Coming west from Taft approaching the 57 the cars are backed up to the riverbed. The cars exiting the southbound 57 turning right on Ball would be confronted with cars waiting in line to get into the gas station or car wash. This would undoubtedly lead to increased frustration and possible more collisions. Since there are multiple gas stations, car washes and 7-Elevens within a short distance I don't think there is a need to build more. Please don't let this happen. I think the welfare of the community out ways the profits this venture would make for the investor of this construction. Thank-you, Marianne Jara Anaheim, Ca 92806 From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Sunkist/Ball Rd project Date:Monday, January 04, 2021 5:04:45 PM We'd like to write to you regarding our concern for a new project consisting of another 7- Eleven , gas station and car wash. We already have all of that just down the block on St College and Ball Rd. There is no need for another one at Ball st/Sunkist. The noise level to the residents behind it would be unbearable. On top of that you are basically putting all these small business that have been in the current plaza out of business. They've been there for years! Why would there need to be a replication of what already exist? We have an AM/PM just across the street. Please take into consideration our request NOT to have this new development take place. Thank you for your attention . Residents on Alki Pl behind the plaza. Liz Tran & Stephen Nguyen From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Monday, January 04, 2021 7:00:08 PM I can’t imagine why Anaheim would even consider destroying one of it’s finest and most most treasured restaurants just to add yet another Seven Eleven when there’s a service station and convenience store on the very same corner and another Seven Eleven only one block away at the corner of Ball Road and State College. I am appalled at the very idea of putting a landmark restaurant out of business to entertain the idea. The last thing Anaheim needs is yet another Seven Eleven. It appears that somebody has offered a considerable amount of money to put one of our own to the curb. My Caucasian son applied at the Seven Eleven at the corner of Katella and Harbor when he was just out of high school and the manager told him - and I quote “We don’t hire white boys here.” If you notice not many Americans are employed by this chain. I sincerely urge you to reconsider immediately! Donna Vestre From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:German Jagerhaus on Ball Rd at Sunkist Date:Tuesday, January 05, 2021 9:39:59 AM I am a homeowner living in the Colony District of Anaheim. I am writing to protest to the Planning Commission to NOT turn Anaheim into a ghetto overrun by car washes, 711's and gas stations. What is wrong with you? We residents want a classier city not one that looks bad. We already have too many 711's and car washes. Put them in Anaheim Hills! Cathy Town From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See; Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Subject:Concerned resident Date:Tuesday, January 05, 2021 10:06:10 AM I would like to reach out and express my concern for the Ball Rd. & Sunkist center • We don't need another 7-Eleven, within a 5-mile radius there are thirteen 7-Elevens and one is not even a mile away. • We don’t need another gas station, within a 5-mile radius, there are nineteen gas stations and one right across the street • We don’t need another car wash, within a 5-mile radius there are twelve car wash two new Rapid Express on State Collage just a couple of miles away. Thank you for your time, A concerned resident of Anaheim Monica Mejía S. Mccloud St From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc:Planning Commission Subject:Ball and Sunkist Shopping Center Date:Tuesday, January 05, 2021 10:12:04 AM Mr. Carvalho, I would like to express my opposition to the idea of a 7-11 and car wash at the shopping center at Ball Road and Sunkist in Anaheim, As a local resident I know that is a very busy corner, particularly so during work hours (going to and from.) I purposely avoid that area when I am in the city of Orange and return home due to the traffic. If the purposed car wash and 7-11 are built, I can only imagine the horrendous traffic as well as accidents that will occur. Additionally, before mention of the purposed building on this site, I have often thought of that location as an overlooked possibility for the city. This area could enhance the German connection with the Jagerhaus Restaurant and the Phoenix Club across the street. If Anaheim is a German name and city, why not create that image in this area in which the culture already exists? It seems like a very overlooked opportunity for other German type businesses (German bakeries, clothing/shoes, travel, china, etc.) Thank you for letting me share my opinion. Cathy Lampshire From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Subject:Sunkist and Ball Project Date:Tuesday, January 05, 2021 11:39:14 AM PLEASE keep our neighborhood as it is! Enough is enough!!! From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Tuesday, January 05, 2021 12:03:07 PM Hopefully the owner (Sandie Schwaiger) can withstand Covid!!! Now you be fair and do not betray an outstanding business that has been in Anaheim for years and years! Have you ever had their Apple Pancake with their homemade jam?? Meredith Harris - Homeowner in Anaheim for 58 years!! From: To:Planning Commission Subject:The Proposed Removal Of Jagerhaus Resteraunt Date:Tuesday, January 05, 2021 12:13:29 PM Hello Planning Commission Staff, My name is Leila Ruiz and a resident of Anaheim who lives close to the Jagerhaus establishment. It has come to my attention that the city is trying to remove the restaurant in order to put a car wash and another seven eleven in place of it. I think that this proposal is absolutely ridiculous for a plethora of reasons. The first being that there is already multiple gas stations and seven elevens very close to Jagerhaus with the closest being across the street. The Jagerhaus restaurant is a staple of our community and I find it deeply upsetting that you are trying to take away this family owned business with a chain store that can be found in almost every major street in Anaheim. I hope that you take these comments into consideration and understand why this would be an issue. Thank you for your time and consideration, Leila Ruiz From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Sunkist/ball road Date:Tuesday, January 05, 2021 12:27:25 PM To whom it may concern: This is regarding the possible Project on Sunkist Ball Road. There Are several reasons that this project should not take place. 1) We do not need another 7-Eleven within a 5 mile radius. 2)Another gas station on this corner is crazy. There are several gas stations right around the corner. 3) The noice level of a car wash and the lack of consideration to the home owners right behind car wash. Furthermore, There are numerous car washes within this area. Another one is absurd. 4) We enjoy having the convenience of a small grocery store / liquor right on the corner. Please consider the above when making your decision on the planning for this area. I see no reason whatsoever to put in these type of businesses. Especially since our area already has all 3 of these businesses within such a short distance. Regards, Rhonda White Sent from my iPhone From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Subject:Sunkist and Ball project Date:Tuesday, January 05, 2021 4:09:05 PM PLEASE DO NOT PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT AT SUNKIST AND BALL. Our neighborhood has enough traffic. This project will only increase and add more congestion at this location. We DO NOT NEED or WANT the City of Anaheim Planning Commission to pass this. VOTE …..NO! From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Re: Proposed 7-11 Gas Station/Rapid Express Carwash (2501-2525 E. Ball Rd.) DEV2019-00042 Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:37:19 PM Wayne, Thank you for the update on the subject issue. I'm the Block Watch Captian for the houses at Sunkist and Whidby Ln which is only two blocks for the proposed project. Please provide me any information that will help the neighbor decide if this is a good fit for the neighborhood and I'll pass it along. Also; I'll inform everyone about the up incoming meeting. Thanks Todd Lockwood Anaheim, Ca 92806 Email: On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:26 PM Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> wrote: Interested Parties- Hello, my name is Wayne Carvalho, City’s project planner assigned to the proposed project. I’m responding on behalf of the City of Anaheim’s Planning Services Division as a result of your email correspondence to Councilmember Stephen Faessel on the 7-11 Gas Station and Rapid Express Carwash proposed at 2501-2525 E. Ball Road. I’ve blind copied you to protect the privacy of your email address. You may have received a notice from the developer (Ilan Golcheh, Golcheh Group) referencing a community meeting on Nov. 6, 2019 which had no time or location listed. The community meeting will actually be held on Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019 from 6:00p.m. to 7:00p.m. at the Sunkist Branch Library at 901 S. Sunkist Street. The developer has indicated that a new notice will be sent to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. This meeting will give the developer the opportunity to introduce the scope of the project and receive feedback. Since it’s the city’s practice not to publish or forward personal emails or phone numbers, you are requested to forward an address to me if you would like to receive a notice of the community meeting from the developer, or for any future public hearing. Please forward your address to wcarvalho@anaheim.net especially if you’re uncertain whether you’re within the 500 foot radius of the project site. I will forward your address to the developer to include in his community outreach. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Regards, Wayne Carvalho I Contract Planner City of Anaheim Department of Planning & Building 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor Anaheim CA 92805 (714) 765-4949 THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAWS. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately. Thank you. From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Re: Proposed 7-11 Gas Station/Rapid Express Carwash (2501-2525 E. Ball Rd.) DEV2019-00042 Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 4:45:19 PM Thank you for the info Wayne. We will be unable to attend the meeting as to being out of town. We are totally against a car wash going in at that corner. It just doesn’t make sense with the residential housing behind & the traffic. There is already a car was down the street. Sincerely, Carol Zucchero David Perez Sent from my iPhone On Oct 30, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> wrote: Interested Parties- Hello, my name is Wayne Carvalho, City’s project planner assigned to the proposed project. I’m responding on behalf of the City of Anaheim’s Planning Services Division as a result of your email correspondence to Councilmember Stephen Faessel on the 7-11 Gas Station and Rapid Express Carwash proposed at 2501-2525 E. Ball Road. I’ve blind copied you to protect the privacy of your email address. You may have received a notice from the developer (Ilan Golcheh, Golcheh Group) referencing a community meeting on Nov. 6, 2019 which had no time or location listed. The community meeting will actually be held on Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019 from 6:00p.m. to 7:00p.m. at the Sunkist Branch Library at 901 S. Sunkist Street. The developer has indicated that a new notice will be sent to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. This meeting will give the developer the opportunity to introduce the scope of the project and receive feedback. Since it’s the city’s practice not to publish or forward personal emails or phone numbers, you are requested to forward an address to me if you would like to receive a notice of the community meeting from the developer, or for any future public hearing. Please forward your address to wcarvalho@anaheim.net especially if you’re uncertain whether you’re within the 500 foot radius of the project site. I will forward your address to the developer to include in his community outreach. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Regards, Wayne Carvalho I Contract Planner City of Anaheim Department of Planning & Building 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor Anaheim CA 92805 (714) 765-4949 THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAWS. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately. Thank you. From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: Proposed 7-11 Gas Station/Rapid Express Carwash (2501-2525 E. Ball Rd.) DEV2019-00042 Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 5:00:48 PM Importance:High Mr. Carvalho: Thank you for the information you provided regarding the subject matter. I doubt that I am within the 500 foot radius of the project site, so this begs the question: Is this meeting only for those residents that are within the 500 foot radius or can any neighbors who are interested in this matter attend the meeting? Either way, I would like to would like to receive a notice of the community meeting from the developer, or for any future public hearing. My address is: Anaheim - 92806 Again, thank you for your time. Respectfully, Judy Villegas From: Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> Date: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 1:26 PM To: Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> Cc: Stephen Faessel <SFaessel@anaheim.net>, David Belmer <DBelmer@anaheim.net>, Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim.net>, David See <DSee@anaheim.net> Subject: Proposed 7-11 Gas Station/Rapid Express Carwash (2501-2525 E. Ball Rd.) DEV2019-00042 From:Ted White To:Wayne Carvalho; David See Subject:FW: Ball and Sunkist Date:Thursday, October 31, 2019 11:14:17 AM Another one for the contact list. Ted White Planning & Building Director | City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 714.765.5209 tedwhite@anaheim net www.anaheim net -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Faessel <SFaessel@anaheim net> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:14 PM To: >; Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim net> Cc: >; > Subject: Re: Ball and Sunkist Good afternoon mr Skonberg: Thank you for the note. Like you, I only heard about this proposed project last Thursday morning. By way of response, I’m copying our Planning Director, mr Ted White, as well as my two City Council Aides for their information. I have received a number of notes from neighbors concerned about the project. I’m aware of the property owner of the center has been trying to sell or lease the property for another use for some time. I understand that the current businesses are on a month to month tenancy and the property owner (not the businesses) have done little to improve the center. I’m a regular at the Jaegerhaus and my wife and I have lived in the Wagner-Rio Vista neighborhood for 44 years. I’m working with City Staff to find out where this project is in the planning process. It will likely come before the Planning Commission and depending upon what the developer is asking for, may not come before the City Council. I served on the Planning Commission for seven years and they are the first review for projects of this kind, if any special permits or changes of land use are considered. I heard from your neighbors that a flier has been distributed to the adjoining neighborhood, giving notice of an informational meeting on Wednesday, next week at the Community Center. I encourage you to make sure that you and your neighbors attend and offer your opposition to the developer in person. In the next few days, I’ll find out more details from the City and share what I learn with all the neighbors that have contacted me. I’m am not a fan of this proposed project, that being said, the property owner has significant rights to develop their property. We have to fight this as a community as we did back in 2013 when the water district threatened to lease the Ball Road basin for a huge power plant, do you recall that one? Most respectfully, Steve Faessel District 5 Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 29, 2019, at 3:48 PM, > wrote: > > Councilmen Faessel, > My name is Eugene Paul Skonberg and I live with my wife at . I’m writing you about the redevelopment proposal on the corner of Ball and Sunkist by the Golcheh Group that I am NOT in favor. I’m not in favor because of the added traffic and pollution it would add to a ready existing traffic problem at the corner of Ball and Sunkist caused by the local traffic from the apartments complex’s, local neighborhoods, 4 schools and 3 churches on or near Sunkist and the vehicles exiting the south 57 Freeway heading East on ball. > The location for the redevelopment project location with the 7/11 convenient store/gas station and car wash makes good business planning but with a car wash at Sunkist and Lincoln and with a exiting 7/11 convenient store and the Puddles car wash on Ball near State college make good business sense I wonder. I urge you and the other city council members to give this proposal a closer look at how it will help the people living in and around this area. I’m not much for writing but thank you for taking the time to read my letter. > > Thank you > Eugene Paul Skonerg > > > > > Sent from my iPhone I understand a flier has been distributed to the adjoining neighborhood giving notice of an informational meeting next week. My follow up finds this info is incorrect and a new community meeting will be held on Thursday, Nov 14 from 6 to 7pm at the Sunkist Library. It will be critical that you and your neighbors attend this meeting and express your concerns and opposition to the developer face to face. Incidentally, I’ve lived in the Wagner-Rio Vista neighborhood for 44 years and am very familiar with our East Anaheim neighborhoods. Thanks for the note, I believe you will be contacted by city staff about the 11/14 meeting very soon. Most respectfully, Steve Faessel District 5 Sent from my iPhone On Oct 30, 2019, at 9:24 PM, Suzanne DeVaney > wrote: Hi Steve, When will the city Council discuss and vote on approving the new car wash, gas station and 7-Eleven at Sunkist and Ball in District 5? The Golcheh Group, from Beverly Drive in Los Angeles, sent a letter to nearby residence telling them the car wash would not add more noise to their neighborhood. The Jager house restaurant has been there 40 years and wants to stay. The owner tried to buy the property, but was rejected. My major concern is the safety of the traffic on that corner, Lincoln and Sunkist. It is Already very dangerous. But with a 7-Eleven and and another gas station and a car wash, my fear is that cars will not be able to get by that very busy corner. The letter states Golcheh Group will be hosting a meeting on Nov. 6 at the community center. Has the city already approved this project, or in their an opportunity to be heard? Thanks for leading District 5 Suzanne DeVaney ANAHEIM, CA 92806 From:Ted White To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: Jim McDonald Date:Friday, November 08, 2019 4:59:07 PM Attachments:Jim McDonald.vcf ATT00001.txt Ted White Planning & Building Director | City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 714.765.5209 tedwhite@anaheim net www.anaheim net -----Original Message----- From: Steve Faessel <stevefaessel@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 11:55 AM To: Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim.net>; David See <DSee@anaheim net> Subject: Jim McDonald Please add this resident to the 7-11 car wash contact list. Steve Faessel From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Planning Meeting for Jagerhaus German Restaurant Date:Thursday, December 05, 2019 11:32:10 AM Dear Planning Commission, I am writing to you to show my support for the Jagerhaus German Restaurant. Too many times wonderful institutions are destroyed in the name of progress. The Jagerhaus shouldn’t fall victim to the same fate. I know that a lot of considerations go into planning commissions decisions on such matters, but I just wanted to voice my opinion on the matter. Please vote to save the Jagerhaus. Sincerely, André Vasquez André Vásquez Operations Manager Protech Construction 2790 East Regal Park Drive Anaheim, CA 92806 Direct Ext. (657) 216-1112 Office (714) 982-5151 Fax (714) 982-5150 w www.protechconstruction.com e andre@protechconstruction.com From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Support for Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Thursday, December 05, 2019 12:59:12 PM Good Afternoon, I am writing you today to show my full support for the Jagerhaus Restaurant. This is an established, family-owned restaurant, a landmark in Anaheim, that my family & I frequent quite often. As an Anaheim resident, I believe the City of Anaheim should be supporting local, family-run, small businesses and I am disappointed to learn that there's a possibility that the Jagerhaus (and those other small business that are in the same center) would be replaced by yet another car wash and 7-11. Family-owned businesses are a cornerstone to the community and should not be replaced by chain restaurants, car washes or convenience stores. There is a 7-11 on practically every other corner, there is NOT another Jagerhaus. Please listen to the residents, all the supporters and customers of the Jagerhaus Restaurant and vote against the car wash and 7-11 being developed. Thank you for your time, Kelly Miller Anaheim Resident From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Jägerhaus Date:Thursday, December 05, 2019 2:15:53 PM As seniors living in Cerritos, we have plenty of good restaurants here in town and in our immediate area without having to brave the freeways. But we do have some favorite restaurants that are outside our area and still a relatively easy drive. Jagerhaus is one of them and I hear they are in danger of being re- developed out That is a shame as that is the only restaurant we drive to in Anaheim and I would hate to see it go or have to move. Good established businesses are hard to find and should be cherished. Please consider the patrons of such businesses by keeping the Jagerhaus at it's current location. Jay Miller Cerritos From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Thursday, December 05, 2019 3:00:28 PM Lunch at Jagerhaus with my sister and BIL was the last time I saw my BIL (German!) before he died. Don't give in to the Goleche family Mary Dee From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Keep Jagerhaus Open! Date:Friday, December 06, 2019 1:12:09 AM Don't let this wonderful piece of Anaheim history be destroyed! And for what? A soulless unneeded gas station or carwash? What an absolute shame. - Yolanda Mariscal From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Friday, December 06, 2019 7:40:15 AM I understand there is a motion to possibly allow the Jagerhaus restaurant to be torn down. This restaurant has been an institution for decades and my family and I drive up from South Orange County regularly to visit this wonderful establishment. In fact it’s an annual event for my husband’s birthday, as well as Oktoberfest and other holidays. It’s a one of a kind restaurant and there are too few of those these days. Please do what you can to save this wonderful institution. From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc:Stephen Faessel Subject:Ball/Sunkist development Date:Friday, December 06, 2019 6:30:12 PM I attended the meeting at the Sunkist Library regarding this property and I have some questions. I object to this project because I believe that it will make the traffic problem there worse than it already is. How is a traffic study conducted? Do they just put sensors on the road and count cars? Do they have a way of counting the number of cars that cut through that shopping center when they get tired of waiting to make a right turn onto Sunkist from Ball? Do they count the cars that exit that center onto Sunkist who can't get in the turn lane to get back on eastbound Ball so they drive north to Lizbeth or Oshkosh to make a dangerous u-turn there instead? Businesses can be relocated but the traffic issues need to be addressed. It's a matter of safety. Also, I saw a sign for an upcoming Express Wash being built on St. College just south of Lincoln. Does the man intending to build his carwash on Ball know there will be another like his so close? Thank you for reading my concerns. I hope the planners give serious thought to all the concerns expressed at the meeting. Lynne Watkins From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc: Subject:Golcheh Group Development Plans for Sunkist Plaza Date:Sunday, December 08, 2019 9:55:38 PM Hi, My name is Daisy Chavez and I am a resident of Anaheim's 5th district, residing at . I am writing this to express my concerns about the developmentplans that were unveiled by the Golcheh Group earlier this week at the community meeting.I have resided in this area since 2006. My family initially lived at 2519 East Strong Place inthe 5th district and has resided at the Casa Madrid Apartments since 2013 when we lost ourhome due to foreclosure. When I heard about the plans that Golcheh Group had planned for the Sunkist Plaza, I wasin shock. Not only is it completely unfair to the small businesses that have been establishedin this plaza, but there is absolutely no need for an additional car wash, 7-11 or gas station.Puddles Car Wash has been my go-to hand wash since I have owned a car and I do not seethe need for another car wash in this area, especially if it will drive out the small businessesthat are already there. In addition, if there are plans for a 7-11 or convenience store, thereis already a 7-11 down the block that I already go to AND His-Nibs Liquor is already in theplaza for my "convenience" needs. Finally, there is no need for another gas station whenthere is already an Arco across from the plaza. I am extremely concerned about these plans and hope the developer reconsiders the needsof the residents who will be most affected by this. I struggle with the traffic at thisintersection as it is already, whether it is coming from Ball Road into Anaheim or turningonto Ball at the intersection from Sunkist. Thank you for taking my concerns into account. Kindest Regards, Daisy Chavez Criminology, Law & Society University of California, Irvine '15 From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Closure of Jagerhaus to build a carwash. Date:Monday, December 09, 2019 4:34:56 PM Please don't let this happen! We have been going there for 25 years; I had my wedding reception in their banquet room! There isn't another authentic German restaurant in the area. There are other car washes close by. Having a gas station and convenience store there would create a problem with people using the right turn lane from Ball Rd. west to Sunkist north. That intersection is always busy because of the off and on ramps for the 57 fwy. From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Big NO on the Ball/Sunkist Development! Date:Monday, December 09, 2019 10:14:50 PM Hello! I am 25-year Anaheim resident living off Sunkist and Ball, and I wanted to notify you of my STRONG opposition to the proposed 7-11/gas station/car wash! A business of that nature will increase car traffic at an already difficult intersection, and also attract even more homeless people looking for handouts. We already installed an alarm system on our house during the riverbed debacle, and we have enough homeless walking Sunkist - let's not add to that! Also, what a miserable neighbor for the homes behind it! Noise, smells, bright lights, and who knows what else they will be forced to live with in their literal backyards. And what about the small businesses that have been there for years, and even decades?! Please, Anaheim, support your small businesses! There is already a gas station directly across the street, four more just up the street at St. College, and you drive past another 7-11 and a car wash on your way there! No more! Thank you for your time, and I do hope you will take into consideration the feelings of your Anaheim residents. Kristine Briggs From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc: Subject:COMMUNITY MEETING - Proposed Development at Sunkist/Ball (2501-2525 E. Ball Road) Date:Thursday, April 16, 2020 10:28:12 AM Wayne, My wife, Rhonda, and I live at in Anaheim. We are very near to the intersection of Sunkist and Ball, where the proposed development has been communicated to us. We are opposed to the proposal for the following reasons: 1. The current lot houses several small businesses which we frequently use to meet our needs 2. Our understanding is that a car wash business is being considered to replace these businesses a. There is already a car wash business (Puddles) located less than a half mile away on Ball Road b. We use Puddles and won’t be using any new car wash coming to this property 3. There are two elementary schools located on Sunkist, and there is significant foot traffic at that intersection 4. There is significant traffic on Sunkist already. Frequently it is difficult and even dangerous to enter Sunkist from Whidby, meaning any new traffic coming to Sunkist/Ball would make it even more dangerous a. There is an apartment complex across the street (on Sunkist and opposite of Whidby), There is not enough parking at the apartments, so those tenants park in our neighborhood ( which is a complaint for another time). Those people jaywalk across Sunkist to exit and enter their cars parked on Whidby. To sum this all up: nobody in the area wants a car wash to be put at that location. There must be better choices that can benefit those Anaheim residents that live in the area. Thank you, Wayne, for considering our input. Rob and Rhonda White This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended addressee (or authorized to receive for the intended addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply and delete the message. To the extent contractual confidentiality obligations exist, this message and all information transmitted with it are designated "Confidential". From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Re: Proposed 7-11 Gas Station/Rapid Express Carwash (2501-2525 E. Ball Rd.) DEV2019-00042 Date:Tuesday, August 18, 2020 5:52:25 AM Hello Wayne, Do you have any update with this proposed carwash & 7-eleven on Ball and Sunkist? Most of our neighborhood is really interested in what is going to be done on that property. Thanks for your help Todd Lockwood On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:37 PM Todd Lockwood > wrote: Wayne, Thank you for the update on the subject issue. I'm the Block Watch Captian for the houses at Sunkist and Whidby Ln which is only two blocks for the proposed project. Please provide me any information that will help the neighbor decide if this is a good fit for the neighborhood and I'll pass it along. Also; I'll inform everyone about the up incoming meeting. Thanks Todd Lockwood Anaheim, Ca 92806 Email: On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:26 PM Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> wrote: Interested Parties- Hello, my name is Wayne Carvalho, City’s project planner assigned to the proposed project. I’m responding on behalf of the City of Anaheim’s Planning Services Division as a result of your email correspondence to Councilmember Stephen Faessel on the 7-11 Gas Station and Rapid Express Carwash proposed at 2501-2525 E. Ball Road. I’ve blind copied you to protect the privacy of your email address. You may have received a notice from the developer (Ilan Golcheh, Golcheh Group) referencing a community meeting on Nov. 6, 2019 which had no time or location listed. The community meeting will actually be held on Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019 from 6:00p.m. to 7:00p.m. at the Sunkist Branch Library at 901 S. Sunkist Street. The developer has indicated that a new notice will be sent to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. This meeting will give the developer the opportunity to introduce the scope of the project and receive feedback. Since it’s the city’s practice not to publish or forward personal emails or phone numbers, you are requested to forward an address to me if you would like to receive a notice of the community meeting from the developer, or for any future public hearing. Please forward your address to wcarvalho@anaheim.net especially if you’re uncertain whether you’re within the 500 foot radius of the project site. I will forward your address to the developer to include in his community outreach. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Regards, Wayne Carvalho I Contract Planner City of Anaheim Department of Planning & Building 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor Anaheim CA 92805 (714) 765-4949 THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, From:David See To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: Ball Rd and Sunkist Date:Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:20:58 AM Please add this to your master list. -DS From: Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 6:58 AM To: David See <DSee@anaheim.net> Subject: Ball Rd and Sunkist I am strongly opposed to putting a Seven Eleven and car wash at this corner. It is already a busy corner for those who use Sunkist to access our neighborhoods, and this would make it a total nightmare. Not to mention the noise and disruption for those who live with their houses backed up to that property. And I love Jagerhaus!! I want it to stay! Peggy Dodd Anaheim, CA 92806 From:David See To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: WE DO NOT WANT a noisy Car Wash or a Seven Eleven at Sunkist and Ball Rd. Date:Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:36:30 AM Another one…. From: Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 2:20 PM To: Kimberly Keys <kimberly.keys614@gmail.com>; John Armstrong <jarmst2534@aol.com>; Michelle Lieberman <mlieberman92805@gmail.com>; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White <awhitste@pacbell.net>; David See <DSee@anaheim.net> Subject: WE DO NOT WANT a noisy Car Wash or a Seven Eleven at Sunkist and Ball Rd. Hello, I have lived at Sunkist and Ball for over 30 years. I have frequented the stores at Sunkist and Ball including the donuts shop and Jagerhause and a few of the other businesses from time to time. I feel that there is no need for another car wash or convenience store and am not sure why it is being considered. The additional traffic and noise would not be welcomed and could diminish quality of life as well as property values. Thanks for your consideration. Marvin Gee From:David See To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: Save Jagerhaus! Date:Wednesday, September 09, 2020 12:58:54 PM I assume that you’re still keeping all of these comments in the DEV case file? From: Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2020 11:42 AM To: John Armstrong <jarmst2534@aol.com>; Kimberly Keys <kimberly.keys614@gmail.com>; Michelle Lieberman <mlieberman92805@gmail.com>; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White <awhitste@pacbell.net>; David See <DSee@anaheim.net> Subject: Save Jagerhaus! Dear City Planners, My family has been going to Jagerhaus for over 35 years. Coming from German heritage, we know authentic German food very well and there is no German restaurant that comes closer. We have many family members that come in to the area and specifically request we meet at Jagerhaus. We have spent countless family events there over the years - birthdays, Father's Day, my husband and I even scheduled our wedding rehearsal dinner there almost 25 years ago. Car washes and 7/Elevens are a dime a dozen. There is only one Jagerhaus! From:David See To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 10:27:54 AM Attachments:image002.png They keep a comin’ in. From: Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 9:04 AM To: David See <DSee@anaheim.net> Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist The only reason my family and I come to Anaheim, besides Disneyland, from my town of Santa Ana is to eat at the Jagerhaus. I am sure there are hundreds of others that do the same, come from other cities and spend some money in Anaheim at the Jagerhaus. How many people will come from out of town to spend money in Anaheim at a gas station or 7/11 or car wash when there is already a 7/11 on La Palma and Sunkist and La Palma and St. College and there are gas stations on every corner. There is even a car wash further down Ball about ¼ of a mile. We have friends that come from the Bay Area and all they want is to eat at the Jagerhaus. It will be shameful to lose this institution and you will be shameful people if you let it happen. Do not give in to corporate greed, stand up for the small business owners in this center, have a back bone. You know what this community wants and needs and it is not a noisy car wash and another gas station, you want gas, there is an ARCO on the opposite corner, you can get a soda there too. John Byrd Sales & Service Supervisor eaves Mission Viejo | 24950 Via Florecer | Mission Viejo, CA 92692 eaves Santa Margarita | 111 Via Serena | Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Phone: 949.380.7656 / 949.589.7759 Fax: 949.380.9268 / 949.589.4473 john_byrd@avalonbay.com Please consider the environment before printing. This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is proprietary to AvalonBay Communities, Inc., intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information designated as internal use, confidential, and/or attorney-client privileged work product doctrine information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message are prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify the sender From: To:Planning Commission Cc:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:54:06 PM Dear City of Anaheim Planning Commission, Regarding the plans to turn the land at 2519-2525 E. Ball Rd. into a car wash, convenience store, and gas station, I respectfully submit this message urging you to reject this plan and allow the current businesses to remain. The Jägerhaus restaurant and His-Nibs store have been at this location for many years. The Jägerhaus is an Anaheim staple. It seems unnecessary to displace all the small businesses in this center for a car wash/gas station-anchored center, as both currently exist within a half mile of this location. Having observed traffic at this intersection during typical “rush hour“ periods, it will be significantly worse for this area, not only for residents but commuters and visitors as well. Please consider the small businesses of Anaheim and reject the plan for the new development. Thank you, Christine From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Please keep the Jagerhaus at it"s current location Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:18:33 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Evenstar1 Date: September 13, 2020 at 9:05:14 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Please keep the Jagerhaus at it's current location Hello, I am writing to you as a loyal Jagerhaus customer, please keep the shopping center as it is on Ball Rd. This restaurant is a Gem to the local community and to residents that drive in from other cities for this unique menu and It would be great to keep it where it is. In my opinion another corner for a car wash and gas station placed in a different location would more than likely suit the community. Please help keep this restaurant where it is. Thank You, Michelle Nunez Santa Ana, CA 92706 From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Plea to Spare Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:24:44 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: DAVID MCPHERRIN Date: September 13, 2020 at 2:30:19 PM PDT To: "dhiruhv@gmail.com" <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Subject: Plea to Spare Jagerhaus Restaurant Dear Mr. Vadodaria, I am writing to urge you to vote against the Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. We have been frequent diners at the Jägerhaus Restaurant, located at the above address. We are so pleased to find a unique, local eatery that serves authentic German food, something we’ve always enjoyed from our youth. The owner treats us like family and stops by our table at nearly every visit. We are always impressed at the number of people, often in larger groups, that are seated in abundance around us. Shops and restaurants that offer one-of-a-kind experiences are the backbone of our communities and country. We appreciate the mom-and-pop stores in our own town, Orange, and make it a point to visit our neighbors in Anaheim as well and give them our support so we can enjoy them for a long time, including our kids and grandkids. We have nothing against car washes and convenience stores. They serve us well and are also a part of the community. But to remove a long-time establishment, and a tribute to the area’s German heritage, would be a great loss. In our previous home, in the Bay Area, we had to say “no” to a charter school that wanted to set up shop in the church behind our backyard. We strongly support charter schools and don’t like to decline their desire to settle near us, but the dynamics of the neighborhood would change so much with traffic and congestion it would reduce the quality and potential safety of the area. As with the church, some things are best left alone to continue offering their great value to our community. Please make that the case with Jägerhaus and have the other businesses settle in another location. Thanks very much! Sincerely, David and Tonya McPherrin From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:28:20 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Brittany Collins Date: September 13, 2020 at 10:47:41 AM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Please do not close Jagerhaus. It is a historic gem and somewhere that generations of my family have loved to visit. We do not need another common strip mall to replace such a lovely establishment. From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:40:07 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Bill Freiberger Date: September 12, 2020 at 8:34:26 AM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Jagerhaus Restaurant Dear Mr. Valdodaria, It has come to my attention that the planning commission is reviewing a proposal to change the land usage for the strip mall where the Jagerhaus Restaurant is located. I hope you vote against it. Jagerhuas has been a part of the community for four decades. It's a wonderful restaurant and a fixture of local German culture. The neighborhood doesn't need another car wash or 7-Eleven. It needs wonderful places like Jagerhaus. Thank you for your time and consideration. Bill Freiberger From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:43:04 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Wakkco <> Date: September 11, 2020 at 8:37:04 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist I am e-mailing you requesting that you save the Jagerhaus. As a long time Anaheim resident I believe is preserving these pieces of our beloved cities history. Thank you! Brigid Anderson Sent from my iPhone From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:43:33 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: John Hrbacek Date: September 11, 2020 at 7:12:13 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Please don’t build a car wash at this location. The Jagerhaus is amazing. It would be a huge loss for Anaheim if this were to happen. John Hrbacek 30 year Anaheim resident. Sent from my iPhone From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:43:50 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Christine Long Beach, Ca." Date: September 11, 2020 at 6:49:15 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Hi, I recently I found out that they really were going to tear down the area where the Jagerhouse and build a car wash. I don't understand how or why anyone would want to put up another car wash and leave this great German restaurant out of its plans. The Jagerhouse has been around for many and many of years. Part of many of our traditions. Many family businesses have gone out of business during covenant 19. Please rebuild your little plaza and continue to let them be there. The last thing Orange county needs is another car wash. There's only a few German restaurants in Orange County and it's very sad to see them get pushed out. Please reconsider .... no car wash and let us continue to go there and eat amazing German food. Thank you, Christine Werwee From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:44:13 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Date: September 11, 2020 at 6:27:07 PM PDT To: "dhiruhv@gmail.com" <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist I don’t understand why you would want to replace a unique restaurant with a cookie cutter gas station complex you can find on any corner? What is wrong with you guys? Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:44:31 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Diane Anderseck Date: September 11, 2020 at 6:26:50 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Planners, I am sending this email to voice my support for Jagerhaus restaurant. We support that local restaurant and would like to see it expand to include an exterior eating area. What a great addition to our local area. We don’t want to see the space wasted on a car wash. Please consider this in your planning, especially in this environment where we need more outdoor dining spaces. This is a long term and community loved restaurant. Diane Anderseck From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:45:24 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Dombrey Scrongles Date: September 11, 2020 at 5:14:26 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Please don't let this local treasure be replaced with another chain with no personality or history! From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:46:02 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Heather Sparks > Date: September 11, 2020 at 4:33:38 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Hello, I would love to see this amazing remodel of Jagerhaus. This hidden gem is delicious and this new concept would draw in so many more people. The old strip mall definitely needs a revamp, no question about it. This new redesign would be so sooo soooo much better than another lame car wash and 7-Eleven when there are already so many. It is not often you find an authentic German cuisine spot and hello bier garten!! Can you say Oktoberfest?? Please save this restaurant and make Anaheim an even more desirable place to live and visit. I don’t know how a car wash will draw people in. People want good food, drinks and entertainment and this new exciting design is exactly what we need. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Heather Sparks Sent from my iPhone From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:46:21 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Heather Sparks Date: September 11, 2020 at 4:33:29 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Hello, I would love to see this amazing remodel of Jagerhaus. This hidden gem is delicious and this new concept would draw in so many more people. The old strip mall definitely needs a revamp, no question about it. This new redesign would be so sooo soooo much better than another lame car wash and 7-Eleven when there are already so many. It is not often you find an authentic German cuisine spot and hello bier garten!! Can you say Oktoberfest?? Please save this restaurant and make Anaheim an even more desirable place to live and visit. I don’t know how a car wash will draw people in. People want good food, drinks and entertainment and this new exciting design is exactly what we need. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Heather Sparks Sent from my iPhone From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:46:41 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Shirley Helmer Date: September 11, 2020 at 4:24:17 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist The Jagerhaus is a go to restaurant and should stay. Don’t need another Car Wash, 7Eleven or Gas Station. Listen to the people. Vote to keep the Jagerhaus. Shirley Helmer From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jagerhaus! Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:47:03 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Casteel Date: September 11, 2020 at 3:58:08 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jagerhaus! To whom it may concern, Please do not tear down the Jagerhaus and replace it with a 7-11 / Car Wash! That is the LAST thing this city needs. Especially with the new renovation planned, the Jagerhaus would be an addition worlds above another chain corner store. Anaheim can honor its great German heritage with a beautiful beer garden and restaurant. For whatever it’s worth, I beg your consideration. Please. A concerned Anaheim resident, Michael Casteel From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:47:26 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Kathleen Young Date: September 11, 2020 at 3:38:47 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Mr. Vadodara, please do not approve another eyesore. The restaurant is lovely. Kathleen Young Sent from my iPad From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Jägerhaus Restaurant preservation. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:47:40 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: heather hill Date: September 11, 2020 at 3:37:44 PM PDT To: "dhiruhv@gmail.com" <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Subject: Jägerhaus Restaurant preservation. Orange County hardly has any representation of our original founders—the proposition to demolish Jägerhaus Restaurant, a local beloved treasure, a well-known landmark, and replace it with a strip mall of sorts that will likely, if not definitely, breed questionable patronage is a despicable one, and to be pushing to do so during this unprecedented time of coronavirus, when said establishment has already been hit hard en total, is reprehensible. Our entire community is discussing and strongly opposes this idea— Anaheim residents would appreciate *much more* transparency from its (planning commitees) re: future and/or potential projects of this nature, especially. From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:48:16 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Brian Gillet > Date: September 11, 2020 at 3:23:49 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Dear Mr. Vadodaria, I am all for redevelopment and believe that it infuses new life in tired areas except when that development is at the expense of longtime institutions or at the expense of excising history. The redevelopment plan for a car wash at Ball & Sunkist that would demolish the Jägerhaus would do both. As you must know by now, the Jägerhaus is a German institution that has been around for 40 years. It is a fixture of the neighborhood and one of the few remaining places that pay homage to Anaheim’s German immigrant beginnings. In its 40 years of existence it has also embraced the surrounding Nation community and serves as a meeting place for groups as well. Approving this redevelopment that would essentially eliminate this restaurant and its community outreach is not worth the price. This is the kind of redevelopment that reeks of large money and complete indifference to the long term effect on the community at large. Please do not obliterate this city’s history. If the area is to be redeveloped, the Jägerhaus should be included in any design and redevelopment project. Thank you for your time and consideration, Brian Gillet Anaheim Resident of The Colony 7 From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Support for Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:48:36 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Kelly Miller < Date: September 11, 2020 at 3:20:59 PM PDT To: "dhiruhv@gmail.com" <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Subject: Support for Jagerhaus Restaurant Reply-To: Kelly Miller Good Afternoon, I am writing you today to show my full support for the Jagerhaus Restaurant. This is an established, family-owned restaurant, a landmark in Anaheim, that my family & I frequent quite often. As an Anaheim resident, I believe the City of Anaheim should be supporting local, family-run, small businesses and I am disappointed to learn that there's a possibility that the Jagerhaus (and those other small business that are in the same center) would be replaced by yet another car wash and 7-11. Family-owned businesses are a cornerstone to the community and should not be replaced by chain restaurants, car washes or convenience stores. There is a 7-11 on practically every other corner, there is NOT another Jagerhaus. During this difficult time we're all facing due to the pandemic, my family and I have continued to support Jagerhaus and other family-owned restaurants in our area. We appreciate the hard work and dedication these business owners, families and employees are doing to stay in business. Please listen to the residents, all the supporters and customers of the Jagerhaus Restaurant and vote against the car wash and 7-11 being developed. Thank you for your time, Kelly Miller Anaheim Resident From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Jagerhaus Resturaunt Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:49:20 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Ede Ferrari-D'Angelo" Date: September 11, 2020 at 3:07:08 PM PDT To: "Ede Ferrari-D'Angelo" Subject: Jagerhaus Resturaunt I am writing to share with you that I strongly object to replacing the Jagerhaus Restaurant with a carwash. Jagerhaus has been a landmark and contributor to the community for so many years. Car washes are not about community. The Jagerhaus is about community. Please consider this with great care. -- Ede Ferrari-D'Angelo DTM 2014-16 Toastmasters Board of Directors It Takes a Personal Touch From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:49:39 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Kevin Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:40:01 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist We’ve been eating at this restaurant for the last 20 years. Please don’t tear it down for a car wash. We need people like the owner of this place to continue having businesses in our neighborhoods. Sandy is one of the good ones Sent from my iPhone From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:49:55 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Yolanda Mariscal Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:35:43 PM PDT To: "dhiruhv@gmail.com" <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Please reconsider destroying the Jagerhaus , a beloved rarity, for yet another carwash. The neighborhood does not need an additional carwash. Thank You, Yolanda Mariscal Get Outlook for Android From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jagerhaus Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:50:18 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:26:04 PM PDT To: <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Subject: Save the Jagerhaus Dear Mr. Vadodaria, I am writing to you to voice my objection to demolishing the Jagerhaus restaurant only to be replaced by yet another car wash. I have been dining there with my family for decades. It is the best German restaurant in Southern California. I would be sad to spend my dollars at another restaurant serving German food in a different city or county, and I’m sure you would rather receive the revenue than give it to another locale. Please do not get rid this restaurant in Orange County, it is a treasured favorite. There are dozens of car washes, but no comparable restaurants where I wish to spend my hard earned dollars. Alison Jordan Virus-free. www.avg.com From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:50:39 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Kalix, Paul" Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:24:19 PM PDT To: "'dhiruhv@gmail.com'" <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Please keep the center intact. Please keep the restaurant here. This is important to so many people, including myself. Thank you. Paul Kalix City of Westminster Water Department Supervisor 14381 Olive, Westminster, Ca. 92683 Phone: 714.548.3699 Fax: 714.373.5328 Email: PKalix@Westminster-CA.gov From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: do not replace Jagerhaus restaurant Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:50:57 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Donna Rivera > Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:15:40 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: do not replace Jagerhaus restaurant Dear Mr. Vadodaria, I wish to add my objections to having the wonderful Jagerhaus restaurant replaced by a common car wash! We have been dining there for decades, as it is the best German restaurant in Southern California. I would hate to have to find a different restaurant that serves German food in a different city, as you probably need all the sales tax revenue you can get. Please do not get rid of my favorite restaurant in Orange County. There are dozens of car washes, but no equal restaurants where I can spend my money. Donna Rivera From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:51:30 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: ARLEEN SANCHEZ Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:10:37 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Sent from my iPad Arleen Sanchez From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Jagerhaus Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:51:53 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Micki Olsen Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:00:26 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Jagerhaus As a long time resident of Anaheim, and patron of Jagerhaus our family is completely against the proposal for another car wash, 7eleven... We believe it is in the best interest of Anaheim to support our local business of the Jagerhaus, and go with their full remodel design! Cynthia Olsen Sent from my iPhone From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: do not replace the Jagerhaus restaurant! Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:52:09 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Fran Long Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:00:10 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: do not replace the Jagerhaus restaurant! Dear Mr. Vadordaria, I wish to add my objections to having the wonderful Jagerhaus restaurant replaced by a common car wash! We have been dining there for decades, as it is the best German restaurant in Southern California. I would hate to have to find a different restaurant that serves German food in a different city, as you probably need all the sales tax revenue you can get. Please do not get rid of my favorite restaurant in Orange County. There are dozens of car washes, but no equal restaurants where I can spend my money. Frances M. Long From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:52:30 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Mike Villegas Date: September 11, 2020 at 1:34:55 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist No carwash needed or 7-11..really? We need to help out small businesses and this is one of them!!! Thanks but no thanks From:dh ruhv@gmail.com To:E ly Morr s Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:53:00 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: jami villegas < Date: September 11, 2020 at 1:11:04 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Sent from my iPhone From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:53:39 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Jessica Parris Date: September 11, 2020 at 1:08:19 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Dear Dave, I am writing as a citizen of Anaheim who would like to attest to the value that the Jagerhaus Restaurant has had here in Anaheim. I would also like to add my voice to the chorus of those requesting you NOT approve their removal for a Car Wash, but rather approve their very impressive plan to remodel and add a Biergarten at their existing location. The Jagerhaus is already an Anaheim institution. This remodel would make it yet another beautiful (and tasty) destination within our city for folks from around Orange County. People don’t drive way out of their way for a car wash (especially when you can find one on almost any corner), but they definitely DO make the trip for authentic German food and an fun Biergarten experience. Such project would only further enhance the reputation and contribution of Jagerhaus within the community. Please spare the Jagerhaus and allow them to also flourish and grow as a quintessential Anaheim small business. Thank you for your consideration, Jessica Parris Anaheim Sent from my iPhone From:dhiru vadodaria To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Tuesday, September 22, 2020 3:56:14 PM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: John Aden < Date: Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 9:13 AM Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist To: <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Hello Do you know where 15% off all arrests happen - outside 7-11’s Do you know there has never been an arrest outside the Jagerhaus? Do you know behind our automatic carwash in Buena Park, the homeless sleep and shoot up There are no homeless drug addicts behind Jagerhaus Only memories.....of our parents and grandparents ..taking us there when we were kids Memories of my kids eating there! Do you have any fond memories of a 7-11 visit or a carwash? Anaheim needs memories — Not car washes and 7-11 John A Buena Parm From:dhiru vadodaria To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Jagerhaus Date:Tuesday, September 22, 2020 3:58:56 PM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: William Leo Date: Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:06 PM Subject: Jagerhaus To: dhiruhv@gmail.com <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Dear Dave Vadodria, We have been going to the Jagerhaus on Ball Road for the last twenty plus years. We live in Chino Hills and have had family reunions and other gatherings at the Jagerhaus. Family from out of the area have stayed at hotels in Anaheim to attend our events. The Jagerhaus is an Anaheim treasure which brings folks from out of the area to Anaheim. No one will travel to Anaheim for a carwash or a Seven-Eleven, but they will remember their visit to Anaheim after visiting a unique restaurant in your city. Please remember your city’s citizens, tourists, and visitors who come to Anaheim to eat at the Jagerhaus. Thank You, Bill and Rachel Leo Chino Hills, CA From:dhiru vadodaria To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the J%3%4gerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Tuesday, September 22, 2020 4:00:39 PM ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Regina Kirakozova Date: Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:41 PM Subject: Save the J%3%4gerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist To: dhiruhv@gmail.com <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Please, save the Jagerhaus and neighborhood! Regina Kirakozova Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Tuesday, September 22, 2020 8:15:33 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: dfatboy2001 < Date: September 22, 2020 at 5:28:42 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Save jagerhaus Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone From:dhiruhv@gmail.com To:Elly Morris Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, October 02, 2020 11:20:23 AM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Kevin Brotcke < Date: October 1, 2020 at 10:55:41 PM PDT To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Dear Dave, I'm a local that recently learned that Jägerhaus might be forced to shut down by the planning commission. As a German, I beg you to keep it open. I've lived in many places in the United States, it's very difficult to find authentic German cuisine. Jägerhaus is special and cannot ever be replicated once torn down, it would be a devastating loss to the community. It preserves our German heritage and is a neighborhood pillar. Please keep Jägerhaus open, I don't approve of yet another car wash/gas station/7-eleven that can be easily found everywhere. A concerned citizen, Kevin Brotcke From:Elly Morris To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Wednesday, December 02, 2020 9:16:33 AM See email below which was forwarded to me by Dave Vadodaria. From: dhiruhv@gmail.com <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 7:25 PM To: Elly Morris <Emorris@anaheim.net>; David See <DSee@anaheim.net>; Niki J. Wetzel <NWetzel@anaheim.net> Subject: Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: M Stocker Date: November 19, 2020 at 6:46:27 PM PST To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Please save the Jagerhaus. It has been an institution in Anaheim for as long as I can remember. Sent from my iPhone From:Irma Huitron To:Elly Morris Cc:Niki J. Wetzel; Scott Koehm; Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: 7/11 Carwash (DEV2019-00042) Date:Monday, December 07, 2020 10:47:01 AM Elly and Wayne, see email correspondence received below. Irma From: Grace Medina <GMedina@anaheim.net> On Behalf Of David See Sent: Monday, December 07, 2020 10:41 AM To: Irma Huitron <irmahuitron@anaheim.net>; Scott Koehm <SKoehm@anaheim.net> Subject: FW: 7/11 Carwash From Dave’s inbox… From: B Huffman Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2020 4:55 PM To: David See <DSee@anaheim.net> Subject: 7/11 Carwash I live in the 92806 area where proposed 7/11 & Carwash is slated at the corner of Ball & Sunkist. Please think of the ramifications of that type of business in our area. Noise and congestion is all I can foresee for that corner in the future if that’s what you allow to be built there. There are two Carwashes within that area, a 3rd one is not needed! There’s another 7/11 within walking distance. Seriously does it make sense to bring more of the same? Not to mention the detriment to the livelihoods of the established business in that strip mall. What will happen to them??? Do you even care??? Ok yes the property needs a makeover, but not another 7/11 Gas Station and especially not a Noisy Car wash!!! These business will do nothing to help our community they will only bring it down and make it a less desirable neighborhood. For the sake of our Neighborhood please listen to us!!! We Do NOT want that in our Neighborhood!! We pay a lot of taxes to live here, we should be able to have some say of what goes on here!!! Thank you for your time, B. Huffman Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone From:Niki J. Wetzel To:Wayne Carvalho Cc:Ted White; Elly Morris Subject:FW: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Tuesday, December 08, 2020 8:18:51 AM Hi Wayne, Another comment for Sunkist/Ball. Niki Wetzel, AICP Deputy Director of Planning and Building Planning and Building Department │ Planning Services City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard │ Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Phone (714) 765-5016 Email nwetzel@anaheim.net From: dhiruhv@gmail.com <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 6:49 AM To: Elly Morris <Emorris@anaheim.net>; Niki J. Wetzel <NWetzel@anaheim.net>; Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim.net> Subject: Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: c b Date: December 7, 2020 at 8:25:51 PM PST To: dhiruhv@gmail.com Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Please reconsider the car wash and 7/11. It is a bad business decision since there is already one of each within half a mile. By approving these you will devastate the other businesses. In addition, locating the car wash by an off- ramp will create even more traffic congestion and accidents. You will then need to spend more money on policing these area. Finally, The Jagerhouse has become an iconic restaurant in Anaheim history which travelers who visit Disneyland come to visit. Losing this business will be a mistake for tourism purposes. For all these reasons, please do not approve these two businesses. Angelita Walle Anaheim, CA 92806 (714)356-5059 From:Grace Medina on behalf of David See To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Tuesday, December 08, 2020 9:33:33 AM From Dave’s inbox… From: c b Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 8:26 PM To: David See <DSee@anaheim.net> Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Please reconsider the car wash and 7/11. It is a bad business decision since there is already one of each within half a mile. By approving these you will devastate the other businesses. In addition, locating the car wash by an off- ramp will create even more traffic congestion and accidents. You will then need to spend more money on policing these area. Finally, The Jagerhouse has become an iconic restaurant in Anaheim history which travelers who visit Disneyland come to visit. Losing this business will be a mistake for tourism purposes. For all these reasons, please do not approve these two businesses. Angelita Walle Anaheim, CA 92806 From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Wednesday, December 16, 2020 10:17:21 AM Hello Mr. Carvalho and the esteemed members of the Planning Commission, Jagerhaus is a cultural landmark of Anaheim's heritage and should not be destroyed to make room for another gas station. There is a gas station already on the opposite corner and more further down Ball closer to Disneyland, so there is not a shortage of gas stations. Gas stations create more erratic traffic patterns, increase vagrancy and attract homelessness, and it being so close to a freeway would encourage more criminal activity. While I understand businesses want to profit from the location, as it is so close to the freeway, Jagerhaus is an important cultural landmark to Anaheim and should remain. Anaheim has a strong German heritage and Jagerhaus is a family owned business who has been open for decades to help Anaheim residents and visitors experience German food and culture. Jagerhaus and Phoenix Club are both amazing cultural landmarks and to lose one would be a huge deficit for a meaningless, selfish, and unremarkable gas station. While I understand updating the spaces would be a good thing, removing a restaurant as unique and with so much character from Anaheim only depreciates Anaheim's uniqueness, heritage and personality. Please respect the wishes of the residents and keep Jagerhaus safe! Respectfully, Amy Hammerschlag From:Niki J. Wetzel To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:FW: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Thursday, December 17, 2020 8:54:35 AM Niki Wetzel, AICP Deputy Director of Planning and Building Planning and Building Department │ Planning Services City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard │ Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Phone (714) 765-5016 Email nwetzel@anaheim.net From: dhiruhv@gmail.com <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 5:44 AM To: Elly Morris <Emorris@anaheim.net>; Niki J. Wetzel <NWetzel@anaheim.net>; Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim.net> Subject: Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Gunn, Dave" <> Date: December 16, 2020 at 8:57:19 PM PST To: "dhiruhv@gmail.com" <dhiruhv@gmail.com> Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist I live right around the corner from this restaurant and the last thing we need is another carwash when there is one literally 2,000 feet down Ball Rd. Thank you, Dave Gunn From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:save jagerhaus Date:Monday, January 04, 2021 1:12:46 PM Hello, In my part of Anaheim, there is a small german business called the Jagerhaus. It has been in my area since 1979. It is truly a home restaurant. I have been there numerous times and truly love the atmosphere. Not only does the food really transport you but the people are really nice. When I was in the fifth grade when we had a Christmas around the world project. I decided to do my project on Christmas in Germany. I had to bring in food, and I had no idea where to begin. We visited the Jagerhaus, and they helped me out. They helped me with food, and my entire class loved what they ate. I enjoy going there and enjoy knowing that there is a small business that gives you a taste and touch of the past. Although I am not German, I have enjoyed German food and culture. Anaheim was founded by German Americans and so this is an amazing place that keeps us in touch with the past. I have tried other shops for german food and have not enjoyed it as much as I do at this restaurant. We do not need another 7-eleven, gas station, or car wash. Why have another place where people can go to get smokes or junk food? While teens may not be using these things now or having problems at the moment does not mean you should continue to dangle these things. Another car wash takes away from home life. Yes, it may be faster than washing your car yourself, but it does not mean it is better for the soul. I have fond memories of washing my parent's cars and getting money. I feel like I truly earned it. I cleaned this car, not a machine. I put in the work and was rewarded. Now maybe not everyone wants to do this, but they will never know the accomplishment. They will put it off, then drive through a car wash and be deprived of a new experience. Does my family use car washes? Only my mom. My dad lets me wash his car. It's quick and easy money for me plus, I get to learn to do things by myself. In this twenty-first century, we are so out of touch with the past, our families, and each other. We may THINK we are not, but we really are. The future will be bright, and it comes every day, but if we do not reflect on the past and everything we have, we will miss it. Jagerhaus is an amazing way to remember the beginning of Anaheim and get in touch with one another. It is a way to learn to appreciate other cultures and not just get so caught up in ourselves and what's fast and easy. Sincerely, Parra ORANGE LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL E-MAIL DISCLAIMER This communication and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages attached to it constitute an electronic communication within the scope of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This communication may contain non- public, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). The unlawful interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited under 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable law. From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission Subject:Ball/Sunkist NE Retail Center Re-Development Date:Monday, January 04, 2021 1:22:29 PM Mr. Carvalho and the Anaheim Planning Commission, I reside at , right around the corner from the shopping center located on the NE corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street, which I have been informed is in the process of applying for approval for re-development into a 7-11 convenience store, gas station, and car wash. While I see the need for re-development/improvements of the un-maintained dump of a shopping center, and I do not have any personal feelings against 7-11, gas stations, or car washes, nor do I have any personal feelings to support utilizing public policy to keep existing businesses in place, I do feel that there is extreme redundancy in approving the proposed businesses for this location. As you know from looking at a map, we have dozens of 7-11’s in the area, including one only 2,000 feet away! We have 5 gas stations and a hand carwash also 2,000 feet away. Why would the city think that we need more? Is there anything that the city can do to spur the property owner to seek out businesses which we are lacking? Thanks, Chris Cammarano shortschit@hotmail.com From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Save Jagerhaus! Date:Wednesday, September 09, 2020 2:12:39 PM Dear City Planners, My family has been going to Jagerhaus for over 35 years. Coming from German heritage, we know authentic German food very well and there is no other German restaurant that comes close. We have many family members that come in to the area and specifically request we meet at Jagerhaus. We have spent countless family events there over the years - birthdays, Father's Day, my husband and I even scheduled our wedding rehearsal dinner there almost 25 years ago. Car washes and 7/Elevens are a dime a dozen. There is only one Jagerhaus! From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Proposed Car Wash at Ball/Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 12:32:03 PM Dear City Planners, I am a resident and home owner in Anaheim near the intersection of Ball and Sunkist. Word has gotten around that your committee is considering an upgrade and remodel of the shopping strip located there. A car wash, gas station, and 7-11 has been proposed for that area I am told. I am urging you to please reconsider. The last things we need in this side of town is another car wash, gas station, and 7-11 convenience store! Within a two mile radius from my home, there are already no less than 4 car wash businesses, 7 gas stations, and at least two 7-11 stores. My family and I enjoy eating at the Jagerhaus restaurant as often as possible. It is also my understanding they have a beautiful proposal for a remodeled restaurant and added beirgarten that would be such a great addition to our area. This would not only keep a favorite restaurant in the neighborhood, but it would also draw more of the convention and tourist traffic that frequents the resort area, and also draw some of the beirgarten traffic from Old World in Huntington Beach up into our city. This would create far more revenue for our city than a car wash! Please listen to the residents who live in this area. I travel past this intersection multiple times daily, as do many others. I don't want to see the same old thing I see on every other corner in our city. A beautiful, themed, and upgraded restaurant complex would be delightful. With a location right off the freeway and located so near other businesses that draw visitors, it would be the best choice for our city. Thank you for your consideration, Debra Coleman Anaheim Taxpayer, Consumer, and Resident From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 12:36:43 PM Dear Planners, I am writing with a heartfelt request that you save our beloved Jagerhaus. This fine restaurant has been our go to place for every special family event during the 12 years we have lived here. The food is authentically German, delicious and there is truly nothing like it in SoCal. The staff is generous, fun loving and always makes certain that all diners have a remarkable German experience. During this very difficult time when most of us are unable to travel, Jagerhaus provides that rare opportunity to visit a unique culture while savoring the food and ambiance of Europe. Sadly, Orange County along with much of the United States, is becoming a vast expanse of chain restaurants, stores and motels. Restaurants like Jagerhaus are becoming close to extinct and we all lose something deeply personal when this happens. What better way to celebrate the Bavarian roots of Anaheim than to preserve this legendary restaurant? Thank you so much for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Barbara Bauer From: To:David See Subject:Support for Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 12:43:27 PM Good Afternoon, I am writing you today to show my full support for the Jagerhaus Restaurant. This is an established, family-owned restaurant, a landmark in Anaheim, that my family & I frequent quite often. As an Anaheim resident, I believe the City of Anaheim should be supporting local, family-run, small businesses and I am disappointed to learn that there's a possibility that the Jagerhaus (and those other small business that are in the same center) would be replaced by yet another car wash and 7-11. Family-owned businesses are a cornerstone to the community and should not be replaced by chain restaurants, car washes or convenience stores. There is a 7-11 on practically every other corner, there is NOT another Jagerhaus. During this difficult time we're all facing due to the pandemic, my family and I have continued to support Jagerhaus and other family-owned restaurants in our area. We appreciate the hard work and dedication these business owners, families and employees are doing to stay in business. Please listen to the residents, all the supporters and customers of the Jagerhaus Restaurant and vote against the car wash and 7-11 being developed. Thank you for your time, Kelly Miller Anaheim Resident From: Subject:A PLEA FOR the JAGERHAUS Center! Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 12:46:58 PM Hello City Planners, I grew up in Anaheim, and I grew up eating at Jagerhaus. It has a special place in my family's heart, as we spent many holidays and special occasions there. I understand that there is a development deal on the table that would replace that center with a car wash/gas station, and I OPPOSE this wholeheartedly. I fully SUPPORT Sandie and the Jagerhaus development plans, which would not only expand that family business but also provide a beautiful new dining experience. We have plenty of corners that can become car washes. But we only have ONE Jagerhaus. I'm sure there's a lot of money involved here. I'm sure that the folks wanting to build the car wash/gas station have a great business plan. But please take into consideration the lives of your community, the loss we'd feel if we had to say goodbye to Jagerhaus, and the lives of the folks who run that restaurant. They have been familiar faces for almost my entire life, and now, more than ever, it is so important to support small businesses. Especially those that enrich the lives of the people of Anaheim. PLEASE support Jagerhaus. PLEASE stop this car wash development. The community you serve is counting on you! Taryn Stickrath OC born & raised Supporter of small businesses From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 1:09:09 PM Dear Dave, I am writing as a citizen of Anaheim who would like to attest to the value that the Jagerhaus Restaurant has had here in Anaheim. I would also like to add my voice to the chorus of those requesting you NOT approve their removal for a Car Wash, but rather approve their very impressive plan to remodel and add a Biergarten at their existing location. The Jagerhaus is already an Anaheim institution. This remodel would make it yet another beautiful (and tasty) destination within our city for folks from around Orange County. People don’t drive way out of their way for a car wash (especially when you can find one on almost any corner), but they definitely DO make the trip for authentic German food and an fun Biergarten experience. Such project would only further enhance the reputation and contribution of Jagerhaus within the community. Please spare the Jagerhaus and allow them to also flourish and grow as a quintessential Anaheim small business. Thank you for your consideration, Jessica Parris Anaheim Sent from my iPhone From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Ne ghborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 1:12:11 PM Sent from my iPhone From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 1:35:48 PM No carwash needed or 7-11..really? We need to help out small businesses and this is one of them!!! Thanks but no thanks From: To:David See Subject:do not replace the Jagerhaus restaurant with a car wash! Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 2:02:13 PM Dear Mr. See, I wish to add my objections to having the wonderful Jagerhaus restaurant replaced by a common car wash! We have been dining there for decades, as it is the best German restaurant in Southern California. I would hate to have to find a different restaurant that serves German food in a different city, as you probably need all the sales tax revenue you can get. Please do not get rid of my favorite restaurant in Orange County. There are dozens of car washes, but no equal restaurants where I can spend my money. Frances M. Long From: To:David See Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 2:02:15 PM As a long time resident of Anaheim, and patron of Jagerhaus our family is completely against the proposal for another car wash, 7eleven... We believe it is in the best interest of Anaheim to support our local business of the Jagerhaus, and go with their full remodel design! Cynthia Olsen Sent from my iPhone From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 2:11:31 PM Sent from my iPad Arleen Sanchez From: To:David See Subject:do not replace Jagerhaus restaurant Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 2:17:19 PM Dear Mr. See, I wish to add my objections to having the wonderful Jagerhaus restaurant replaced by a common car wash! We have been dining there for decades, as it is the best German restaurant in Southern California. I would hate to have to find a different restaurant that serves German food in a different city, as you probably need all the sales tax revenue you can get. Please do not get rid of my favorite restaurant in Orange County. There are dozens of car washes, but no equal restaurants where I can spend my money. Donna Rivera From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 2:24:59 PM Please keep the center intact. Please keep the restaurant here. This is important to so many people, including myself. Thank you. Paul Kalix City of Westminster Water Department Supervisor 14381 Olive, Westminster, Ca. 92683 Phone: 714.548.3699 Fax: 714.373.5328 Email: PKalix@Westminster-CA.gov From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jagerhaus Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 2:27:45 PM Dear Mr. See, I am writing to you to voice my objection to demolishing the Jagerhaus restaurant only to be replaced by yet another car wash. I have been dining there with my family for decades. It is the best German restaurant in Southern California. I would be sad to spend my dollars at another restaurant serving German food in a different city or county, and I’m sure you would rather receive the revenue than give it to another locale. Please do not get rid this restaurant in Orange County, it is a treasured favorite. There are dozens of car washes, but no comparable restaurants where I wish to spend my hard earned dollars. Alison Jordan Virus-free. www.avg.com From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 2:34:53 PM Please reconsider destroying the Jagerhaus , a beloved rarity, for yet another carwash. The neighborhood does not need an additional carwash. Thank You, Yolanda Mariscal Get Outlook for Android From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 2:40:26 PM We’ve been eating at this restaurant for the last 20 years. Please don’t tear it down for a car wash. We need people like the owner of this place to continue having businesses in our neighborhoods. Sandy is one of the good ones Sent from my iPhone From:lo To: Subject:Jagerhaus Resturaunt Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 3:07:25 PM I am writing to share with you that I strongly object to replacing the Jagerhaus Restaurant with a carwash. Jagerhaus has been a landmark and contributor to the community for so many years. Car washes are not about community. The Jagerhaus is about community. Please consider this with great care. -- Ede Ferrari-D'Angelo DTM 2014-16 Toastmasters Board of Directors It Takes a Personal Touch From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 3:24:29 PM Dear Mr. See, I am all for redevelopment and believe that it infuses new life in tired areas except when that development is at the expense of longtime institutions or at the expense of excising history. The redevelopment plan for a car wash at Ball & Sunkist that would demolish the Jägerhaus would do both. As you must know by now, the Jägerhaus is a German institution that has been around for 40 years. It is a fixture of the neighborhood and one of the few remaining places that pay homage to Anaheim’s German immigrant beginnings. In its 40 years of existence it has also embraced the surrounding Nation community and serves as a meeting place for groups as well. Approving this redevelopment that would essentially eliminate this restaurant and its community outreach is not worth the price. This is the kind of redevelopment that reeks of large money and complete indifference to the long term effect on the community at large. Please do not obliterate this city’s history. If the area is to be redeveloped, the Jägerhaus should be included in any design and redevelopment project. Thank you for your time and consideration, Brian Gillet Anaheim Resident of The Colony From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Cc: Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 3:34:32 PM Hello planning commissioners! This is a simple email with two points: 1) Jägerhaus is a treasure. It's getting harder and harder to find great Central European cuisine, and here's a fantastic place that my family has loved since moving to Anaheim (A GERMAN NAME!!! Hellooooo!) 16 years ago. Owned and run by an amazing woman, with ties back in Germany, and who visits all the diners and makes them feel at home. Anaheim should embrace keeping Jägerhaus running if for no other reason that supporting the cultural heritage of the city! (But also because it does great business, is well-loved by a zillion regulars, and is just that good a place.) 2) A CAR WASH RIGHT OFF THE 57 WHERE A TON OF TRAFFIC EXITS TO GET TO DISNEYLAND???? I'm sorry. That does not compute. I wouldn't want to be the civil engineer to figure out how to deal with the traffic snafus this will cause...nor the city official negotiating with Disney when Disney can bring up how the city hamstrung the Disney experience for many park-goers. I know you all really, REALLY want to help keep the city going and growing, earning revenue, and creating a better home for our families. Believe me, this car wash will snarl that progress like it will snarl traffic. A better use of that lot? Give the whole thing to Jägerhaus with an improvement loan to create the best German restaurant/cultural experience in all of SoCal--right within a couple minute drive from the resort and conference area! That's progress. :) With all sincerity, and great appreciation you took the time to read this, John Robinson From: To:jaremst2534@aol.com; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 3:36:10 PM Hello: I am Carole S. Chambers. I am a current resident of Placentia, but am an employeeof AESD. My husband and I grew up in Anaheim. I attended Lincoln Elem., Sycamore JHS,and Katella HS; he attended Loara Elem., Trident JHS, and Loara HS. We also have familythat still resides throughout Anaheim. I am writing today to say that the notion of losing Jagerhaus, in its current location, in favorof a car wash is absurd. Anaheim has a sad history of destroying it's historic and culturalbusinesses and spaces and leaving ugly in its place. In recent years, they have done agood job of allowing restoration and buildings that express more of Anaheim's traditionalculture. To allow Jagerhaus to be removed would be one more misstep. The proposal the owners of Jagerhaus have made, of a beautifully updated restaurant andbeer garden on the Ball Road location, would be a much better use of the space than thecar wash that is under consideration. There is a carwash less than 1/2 mile away. Jagerhaus is part of the legacy of that part of Anaheim and is much beloved. I am 61years old - graduated from KHS in 1977. We, (my class at Katella), held one of ourgraduation events at Jagerhaus. Jagerhaus belongs in the space it is currently in. Remodeling/upgrading it and making it yet another destination spot in Anaheim would be amuch more profitable and beautiful addition than a carwash. Thank you for your consideration. Carole Chambers, M.A., CCC-SLPSpeech Language Pathologist, AESDAdjunct Lecturer, CSUF From: To:David See Subject:Jägerhaus Restaurant preservation. Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 3:39:35 PM Orange County hardly has any representation of our original founders—the proposition to demolish Jägerhaus Restaurant, a local beloved treasure, a well-known landmark, and replace it with a strip mall of sorts that will likely, if not definitely, breed questionable patronage is a despicable one, and to be pushing to do so during this unprecedented time of coronavirus, when said establishment has already been hit hard en total, is reprehensible. Our entire community is discussing and strongly opposes this idea—Anaheim residents would appreciate *much more* transparency from its (planning commitees) re: future and/or potential projects of this nature, especially. From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 3:42:29 PM Please Mr. See, do not approve another car wash on this site. Appreciate what your city has in this restaurant. Kathleen Young Sent from my iPad From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; mlieberman9205@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 3:42:32 PM Importance:High This is to inform all of you that I, in addition to many more neighbors and others who don’t even live in the neighborhood, strongly oppose the proposed plan of placing a carwash/gas station and 7-11 on the subject property. We want the Jagerhaus to remain and include a bier garden (beer garden) to be able to occupy the entire piece of property where it is now located! A new and bigger Jagerhaus would be an asset to the surrounding community and to the City of Anaheim. A welcome change and it would draw a lot of business from the resort area and sports venues. Many people come from south OC, and other surrounding counties (L.A., Riverside, San Bernardino) to enjoy the cuisine and friendliness of the Jagerhaus. This would only add to the pride of the neighborhood and would be a notable “visitor” attraction. By putting a carwash/gas station and 7-11 on that property, it will become a blighted area. There are already far too many carwashes and 7-11’s in this area. I urge all of you who are involved in this decision, to make the right decision. If you lived in our neighborhood and the surrounding ones, I’m sure each of you would not want to see this property become blighted, as mentioned above! Thank you for giving us the opportunity to let our voices be heard. Judy Villegas From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Jägerhaus German Restaurant Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 3:43:45 PM Dear Planning Commission, I would like to urge you to carefully consider the car wash/7-11 project that has been proposed at Sunkist and Ball. That portion of Ball is already extremely busy and causes traffic to back up on the overpass as well as on the 57 freeway. I can only imagine how much more traffic will be impacted by automobiles moving in and out of that shopping center for a quick stop at 7-11 as well as backing up, waiting to move through the car wash. Right now, I wouldn't even attempt trying to turn into the center myself except that I love Jägerhaus. I usually take the long way around and come in from Sunkist so that I can avoid the worst of the traffic. I don't think that entrance will even be a viable option for the car wash. It seems that every other corner in Orange County has a car wash on it these days - do we really want that to be what people see in Anaheim? We already lost our downtown area to a grocery store/mini mall and we have virtually nothing left of the city's German heritage. Jägerhaus has been a part of our city for over 40 years and has a strong local following, as well as visitors who come to the resort area. The restaurant is always hopping during the NAMM show, as many of the artists who attend have discovered the restaurant! I love the Biergarten vision that Jägerhaus has for the restaurant and center. If there was a way that this concept could materialize, I think that it would be a boost for our city, just as the Packing District has been to the downtown area. My friends and family always use the Ball exit to get to the Disneyland Resort and pass right by the shopping center at Sunkist. The previous owner did not seem to invest any time or money in the center and it has been an eyesore for a while, so there is nothing there now to invite out-of-towners who have not heard about the restaurant.. An upgrade is just what it needs. Thank you and I hope that something can be done to save the businesses in the center and our city from another car wash. Luckily, I don't live in the area and will choose to avoid Ball/Sunkist entirely if the car wash goes in. Concerned Anaheim resident, - Pat Pat Grimm Anaheim, CA 92806 From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 4:08:09 PM Hello Mr. See, To put it frankly the last thing Anaheim needs is another car wash. There is an opportunity to create something iconic that is not only esthetic but a source of tax revenue. Anaheim is a city full of attractions such as Disneyland, Honda Center, Angel Stadium, to the packing district. A German themed restaurant with bier garden gives another reason for the non-Disney crowd to visit. Top that with the ability to then compete with cities like Huntington Beach with Old World it’s hard for me to see how a car wash would be preferable. As an Anaheim resident who lives near the packing district I’ve seen the amount of business this attraction has brought to the city. If the decision comes down to numbers which option do you think would give the City the higher tax revenue? My Best Heather Saretsky From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 4:24:40 PM The Jagerhaus is a go to restaurant and should stay. Don’t need another Car Wash, 7Eleven or Gas Station. Listen to the people. Vote to keep the Jagerhaus. Shirley Helmer From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 4:34:00 PM Hello, I would love to see this amazing remodel of Jagerhaus. This hidden gem is delicious and this new concept would draw in so many more people. The old strip mall definitely needs a revamp, no question about it. This new redesign would be so sooo soooo much better than another lame car wash and 7-Eleven when there are already so many. It is not often you find an authentic German cuisine spot and hello bier garten!! Can you say Oktoberfest?? Please save this restaurant and make Anaheim an even more desirable place to live and visit. I don’t know how a car wash will draw people in. People want good food, drinks and entertainment and this new exciting design is exactly what we need. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Heather Sparks Sent from my iPhone From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 5:00:34 PM Save the jagerhaus. There's so many carwashes around but no real German beerhouse. Sent from my iPhone From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 5:14:51 PM Please don't let this local treasure be replaced with another chain with no personality or history! From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Please Consider Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 5:42:22 PM Hello all, Let me start by saying thank you for your time. I'm extremely busy myself, but feel strongly that your residents voice should be heard. I'm reaching out to you all in regards to the proposed development on the N/E corner of Sunkist and Ball. This location has quite a few shops, but one in particular stands out amongst them all. The Jagerhause has called this location home for a very long time. The Jaugerhause features authentic German cuisine that showcase the heritage our city was built upon. Sandy has poured her blood, sweat, and tears into her restaurant that we all love. She understands what the residents of Anaheim want has given us all a very special place to celebrate special occasions. She would love to provide a face lift to the center and has rendered drawings of her vision that I'm sure your Planning Commision would approve of. Unfortunately big business is looking to come in and flatten the small businesses we cherish. I sat in a meeting listening to the developers and their grand plans to add another car wash and 7-11 in our city. Why anyone would think we need another car wash and 7-11 is beyond your residents wildest imagination considering you can find both of them less than 2 miles away. I would hope that city would listen to what its residents want in their city. It was loud and clear that your residents want our beloved Jaugerhause to remain in business serving authentic German food. If Sandy's business can survive COVID19, I'm positive you can help her survive big business oppression. Again, thank you for your time and consideration. Thanks, Scott Todd (City of Anaheim resident for 34 years) From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 6:27:43 PM I don’t understand why you would want to replace a unique restaurant with a cookie cutter gas station complex you can find on any corner? What is wrong with you guys? Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 6:27:45 PM Planners, I am sending this email to voice my support for Jagerhaus restaurant. We support that local restaurant and would like to see it expand to include an exterior eating area. What a great addition to our local area. We don’t want to see the space wasted on a car wash. Please consider this in your planning, especially in this environment where we need more outdoor dining spaces. This is a long term and community loved restaurant. Diane Anderseck From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 6:50:01 PM Hi, I recently I found out that they really were going to tear down the area where the Jagerhouse and build a car wash. I don't understand how or why anyone would want to put up another car wash and leave this great German restaurant out of its plans. The Jagerhouse has been around for many and many of years. Part of many of our traditions. Many family businesses have gone out of business during covenant 19. Please rebuild your little plaza and continue to let them be there. The last thing Orange county needs is another car wash. There's only a few German restaurants in Orange County and it's very sad to see them get pushed out. Please reconsider .... no car wash and let us continue to go there and eat amazing German food. Thank you, Christine Werwee From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 7:12:35 PM Please don’t build a car wash at this location. The Jagerhaus is amazing. It would be a huge loss for Anaheim if this were to happen. John Hrbacek 30 year Anaheim resident. Sent from my iPhone From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 7:25:46 PM Mr. See, I’ve had the privilege of calling Anaheim my home since 2009. I purchased my first home here and I’m looking to stay and upgrade, despite commuting to Irvine I’ve seen the area change and I like what I see and read about. One of the things that makes Anaheim special and unique are places like the Jagerhaus. It’s a call-back to Anaheim’s history, it’s a great place to go and feel like your eating with family. I’ve been trying to support them during these times by getting take-out, I would hate to see the Jagerhaus close, especially if the rumors are true and it will be replaced with a rumored car-wash/liquor store/convenience store. There are already enough of those around, we don’t need more of the same. Save the Jagerhaus, let’s keep Anaheim unique and special! Thank you, Greg Alvarez Anaheim, CA 92805 From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; awhiste@pacbell.net; David See Subject:Save Jägerhaus! Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 7:31:31 PM Good evening Planning Commission, Please save Jägerhaus! It brings history, diversity, old world charm and very good food to Anaheim. It is one of our family’s favorite Anaheim destinations (and that takes some doing!) The last thing we need is another car wash! The existing ones are heavily underused as it is! William Jacobson, esq. Anaheim, CA From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 8:37:26 PM > I am e-mailing you requesting that you save the Jagerhaus. As a long time Anaheim resident I believe is preserving these pieces of our beloved cities history. > Thank you! > Brigid Anderson Sent from my iPhone From: To:John Armstrong; kimberley.keys614@gmail.com; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:No to the Redevelopment of 2525 E. Ball Rd. Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 8:47:49 PM Hello, I am a resident of Anaheim and I am opposed to the plans to redevelop the property at 2525 E. Ball Road. The proposal includes a car wash, a 7-Eleven convenience store, and a gas station, all of which are duplicated within twenty seconds' drive of that intersection, with an Arco service station literally across Sunkist Street, four gas stations at S. State College Blvd. and E. Ball Rd, and Puddles Car Wash and a 7-Eleven in the 2000 block of E. Ball Rd. What is not available nearby is the Jägerhaus German Restaurant, Melchor's Bakery, the His- Nibs Liquor Store, and the other businesses in that plaza. These are small businesses owned by families following their American dream of entrepreneurship. In the particular case of the Jägerhaus, it has served as a community gathering place for many years; the banquet room on its western end hosts civic groups, family gatherings (including my own daughter's baptism celebration), and even the occasional political fundraiser. Please use your power as a city planner to put a stop to this redevelopment. Anaheim will be made poorer by substituting in three large chains for the many small businesses. Thank you for your time. David Lieberman Anaheim, CA 92805 From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 9:17:01 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jim Karras Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.94.131. From: To:Steve White; dhiruhv@gmail.com; David See; John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; rmulleady@aol.com Subject:Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 10:08:38 PM Good evening all, I hope this email finds you well; I was made aware of some potential plans for the Jagerhaus restaurant and I wanted to voice my support for the restaurant and the concept they shared on their Facebook page. Anaheim is currently up and coming in the brewery/beer scene and a German beer garden/restaurant would be perfect. It’s a wonderful homage to the city of Anaheim’s German heritage and also to the themed environments the city provides. This particular plan is something I know I would take family members from out of town to see as well. I hope you’re able to consider the plans Jagerhaus is proposing as I think they’d be a great fit for our city. From: To:David See Subject:Save the J%3%4gerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 10:42:25 PM Please, save the Jagerhaus and neighborhood! Regina Kirakozova Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 10:58:23 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Covina, CA 91723 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.156.118.215. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 11:06:03 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Garden Grovr, Ca 92845 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 98.149.102.105. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 11:27:50 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lillian Scott Anaheim, California 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.20.57. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 11, 2020 11:58:42 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tanza Williams Anaheim, CA 92806-5049 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.191.137.108. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:08:20 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Stuart Fricke Anaheim, CA 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.193.136.222. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:28:30 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Adam Duberstein Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.67.101. From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:11:02 AM We don't need another car wash or 7-eleven. We need to save Jagerhaus!!! Ellen Mehlenbacher From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:10:04 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Melinda Sloan Covina, CA 91724 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.118.210.196. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:12:34 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Charles Rogers Tustin, Ca 92780 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.219.56.69. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:18:20 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Germaine Neumann-Chau Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.95.8.88. From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:55:24 AM Planners, I am writing to express our concern that Jagerhaus might be forced to close. We have dined there often during the past ten years and have found it to be unique in Southern California. Not only does it offer authentic German cuisine but also provides a unique and terrific German atmosphere. Family type restaurants are becoming increasingly hard to find in our chain restaurants environment. We always look forward to our Jagerhaus visits and feel it would be a significant loss to the community if it closed. We urge you to preserve this unique establishment. Sincerely, Dave Bauer From: To:David See Subject:Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 8:49:58 AM Dear Mr. See, It has come to my attention that the planning commission is reviewing a proposal to change the land usage for the strip mall where the Jagerhaus Restaurant is located. I hope you vote against it. Jagerhuas has been a part of the community for four decades. It's a wonderful restaurant and a fixture of local German culture. The neighborhood doesn't need another car wash or 7-Eleven. It needs wonderful places like Jagerhaus. Thank you for your time and consideration. Bill Freiberger From: To:David See; Steve White; John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Michelle Lieberman Subject:Save the Jagerhaus Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:02:17 AM Hello Planning Commission, We live in 92805, District 4, and am strongly opposed to the planned carwash/7-11/gas station plan for Sunkist/Ball intersection. My wife and I decided to live and raise our family in Downtown Anaheim because we appreciate the city’s history, enjoy it’s present energy, and believe in the city’s future. Jagerhaus has served the community for over 40 years, and represents an important part of Anaheim’s German Heritage. The plans to redevelop and expand Jagerhaus into a larger experience offer the community and tourists an exciting destination, and the city increased revenue. The Packing District has been a great example of developing new concepts while preserving the history and spirit of our town (and has been a commercial success to boot!). We do not need another gas station/7-11/car wash at that location. Please vote against the car wash/7-11/gas station plan, and support our neighbors at the Jagerhaus! Respectfully, Brian, Melohnie, Everett, & Eleanor DeMers From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:04:04 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Melohnie DeMers Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.91.44.0. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:14:36 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Nancy Edwards Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.250.97. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:16:55 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Mary Jo Vincent Yorba linda, Ca 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.112.152.188. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:48:22 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Linda Newby Anaheim, California 92805-4813 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.183.240. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:54:45 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Ginny Petrilla Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.221.108. From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:SAVE THE JAGERHAUS! Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:55:46 AM Hello all, I am writing to plead for your support in saving the Jagerhaus German Restaurant. Anaheim, Orange County, and most of southern California is gradually losing its cultural heritage sites and giving way to whatever is new, flashy, and purported to turn a quick buck. Anaheim, German in its origin, should not lose a culturally significant restaurant and gathering place to a car wash and a 7/11. We have to do better than that. Jagerhaus has been sharing some impressive ideas for expansion on their Facebook page. I hope that you'll consider the importance of a family-friendly restaurant and gathering place over another car wash and convenience store, of which there are already too many. Thank you for your time and consideration, Ryan Tickle From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:04:12 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kyle Snyder Anaheim, Ca 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.19.247. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:08:02 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Fran Hanley Placentia, Ca 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.77.228.174. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:11:37 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Corey Spencer Stanton, Ca 90680 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.203.74.131. From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Saving the Jagerhaus Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:15:24 AM Hello, my name is Anita Felty. Before I moved to Flagstaff, AZ a decade ago due to school and work, I used to patron the Jagerhaus. My father's family have German heritage, and have even spent time in Germany. I must say, we all love the authenticity and celebration of German culture the Jagerhaus has brought in their food and atmosphere. I still visit this restaurant any chance I get when I am back in Orange County. It is no mystery that German culture is not a common sight in Southern California. But, in turn, Southern California is so very well known for the amalgamations and celebrations of so many many different cultures and heritages. There are few places such as the Jagerhaus, that so frequently and lovingly share their culture and food to so many people of different backgrounds. My mother's family is Native American and Mexican, and have always felt welcome and well-treated in the Jagerhaus. To remove a restaurant like the Jagerhaus merely for another gas station is purely insulting to the spirit of Anaheim and all of Southern California. PLEASE reconsider your plans for the car wash, and allow this wonderful restaurant to continue. For many of us it is more than just walls, it is a family and an experience we most look forward to. -- - Anita Felty From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:22:51 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Norma Brown Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 75.35.219.149. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:24:26 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Richard Lowery Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.113.163.62. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:27:31 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Anthony Esposito Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.91.41.251. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:38:31 AM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jeffrey Petrilla Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.221.108. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 12:44:25 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Erin Longhofer Anaheim, Ca 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.7.144.5. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 1:00:50 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Virginia Gardner Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.191.138.143. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 1:04:52 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kristi Hofstetter Batiste Placentia, CA 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.94.89.254. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 1:04:56 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cathi Hofstetter Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.94.89.254. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 1:39:13 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, David Kolowski Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.141.127. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 2:32:09 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Naomi Goodwin Anaheim, CA 92807-3247 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.254.213.208. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 2:32:10 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Renee Medrano Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 142.129.66.158. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 2:40:03 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, RAMONA SPELLMEYER ANAHEIM, CA 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 68.126.221.253. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 2:41:16 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Warren SPELLMEYER ANAHEIM, CA 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 68.126.221.253. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 2:53:32 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Shannon Pickett Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.241.155.76. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 2:54:28 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Ron Breach Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.240.167.225. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 3:05:15 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Nancy Hubbard Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.215.8. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 3:19:45 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Julie Fort Anaheim, Ca 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.191.39.51. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 3:40:12 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Alissa Clark Anaheim, CA 92804 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 45.17.143.158. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 3:40:18 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jerry Fuentes Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.33.26.6. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:04:10 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lisa Molitor Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.40.65.112. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:30:02 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jennifer Garnant Placentia, CA 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.89.48.106. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:34:23 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Christa Guerena Anaheim, CA 92812 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.59.117. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:34:37 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Mike Bulrice Anaheim, CA 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.206.149.205. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:36:55 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Mathilde Lamb Anaheim, CA 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.59.117. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:44:38 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, GABRIELE KOEHLER ANAHEIM, CA 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.206.149.205. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:49:13 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, PETER LAMB Santa Ana, CA 92701 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.22.167. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:50:37 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Elaine Hoffmann Santa Ana, CA 92706 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.218.198.89. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:53:43 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Daisy Chavez Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.234.114.23. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 4:55:11 PM September 12, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Andre Schotte San Rafael, Ca 94903 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 24.5.111.252. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:02:57 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Robert Cavener Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.150.206.95. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:09:27 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Donna Scales Anaheim, California 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.21.19. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:15:37 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Wanda Fahrenholz Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.33.26.0. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:21:55 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Evelia Barba Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.33.8.112. From: To:David See Subject:SUPPORT FOR JÄGERHAUS Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:24:30 PM One of the best ideas to come to Anaheim is the Jägerhaus Restaurant extension! This is a GREAT idea for Anaheim. Please do NOT move forward with the car wash and instead give a local favorite eatery this beautiful opportunity. YES TO JÄGERHAUS RESTAURANT EXTENSION!! Respectfully, Saul & Suzy Fuentes From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:29:00 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Angela Young La Habra, CA 90631 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 45.51.117.58. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:38:42 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Candice Whiteside Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.250.124.38. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:40:58 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Janet King Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.91.222.221. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:46:51 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tina Steele Brea, Ca 92821 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.219.68.215. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:52:37 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Maura Alarcon Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.140.245. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:53:39 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lori Werstein Laguna Beach, CA 92651 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 98.164.204.2. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:54:19 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Marie Heckman Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.33.23.111. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:05:59 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Matthew Kari Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.196.252. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:18:37 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Eric Tadeja Yorba linda, Ca 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 73.118.196.123. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:19:05 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Amy Merold Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.251.187. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:21:52 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Paul Anderson Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.186.143.135. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:53:34 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Dee Jurkosky Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.120.41.160. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:14:12 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cynthia Beebe Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.33.3.186. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:20:51 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kim Sanchez Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.215.22.194. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:30:20 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Ando Muneno Placentia, California 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.169.162.254. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:56:59 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Josh Merold Anaheim, Ca 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.243.178.15. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:57:03 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Marilyn Castillo Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.91.220.240. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:58:25 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, :Henriette Renaud Anaheim, California 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.234.115.61. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 8:06:08 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Genevieve Yulo Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.77.229.112. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 8:47:30 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kristine Krumes Anaheim, Ca 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 142.129.67.218. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 8:55:08 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Susanne Darcy Orange, California 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.240.78.246. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:03:20 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Danielle Kramer ORANGE, CA 92866-1843 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.112.204. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:16:23 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Michael Pulos Anaheim, Ca 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.65.126.85. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:19:52 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jason Smith Anaheim, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.169.166.121. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:20:02 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Laurie Rhode Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.194.68.31. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:22:54 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Christie Israel Lake forest, Ca 92630 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 68.5.91.126. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:30:32 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tiffani Earnest Orange, Ca 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.22.201. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:32:07 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Barbara Swanson Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.74.243.226. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:59:53 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, JP Zoch Orange, Ca 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.240.67.175. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:12:56 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tricia Enell Orange, CA 92868 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.195.20. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:18:17 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Ryer Pickren Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.186.20.59. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:18:51 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jillian Miyagi Anaheim, California 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.169.169.183. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:41:19 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Nicholas Gorman Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.242.47.84. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:43:37 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Natasha Pejakovich-Elam Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.95.10.28. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:44:32 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Erin Patel Orange, Ca 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.240.76.207. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:53:53 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Rob Kirby Orange, Ca 92967 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.31.231.150. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:09:52 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Natalie Rensink Orange, Ca 92868 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.80.16.206. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:12:47 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Adelaide Butler Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.119.127.28. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:17:01 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Larry Griffin Anaheim, CA 92817 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.17.94. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:20:35 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Joanna Janssen Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.70.218. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:29:13 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kevin Kidney Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.22.216.200. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:29:42 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Sandi Williams Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.242.35.160. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:34:23 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Orange, CA 92683 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 98.149.120.112. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:39:24 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Liz Parker Orange, Ca 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 75.82.241.250. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:42:43 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Sami Naber Fullerton, CA 92835 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.57.21.175. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:44:45 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jennifer Potts FULLERTON, California 92835 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.57.21.175. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:46:38 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Alex Haddad ANAHEIM, CA 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.57.21.175. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:07:48 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, ANDONIA WARD Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.64.63.160. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:28:25 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Dawn Driesbach Orange, CA 92868 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.127.4.155. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:36:15 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Amy Lam Lakewood, California 90712 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.113.144.103. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:57:00 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cindy Calvo Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.190.101.46. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:58:54 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Pam Young Orange, CA 92866-3041 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.77.229.39. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:09:19 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Justin Kawamoto La Verne, CA 91750 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 94.66.12.19. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:13:22 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Sheryl Lambert Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.208.193.76. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:01:12 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Peggy Crawford Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.33.19.63. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:16:13 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Naomi Tapia Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.122.21. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:50:16 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Carolyn Dalton Orange, California 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.98.142. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:52:35 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Ann Miller Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.143.166. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:10:33 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Vanessa Rooke Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.240.64.183. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:20:21 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Colleen Leonard Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.243.137.246. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:22:54 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, stacey stasior Irvine, CA 92618 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.181.75.95. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:51:25 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Amanda Johnson Orange, CA 92868 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.55.102. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:53:23 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Mindy Weiss Anaheim, Ca 92804 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.251.98.136. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:54:19 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Brooke Lamb Orange, Ca 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 67.143.208.89. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:07:58 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, candi bahaner newbury Park, CA 91320 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.157.153.36. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:29:08 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Krystyna Kisting Anaheim, Ca 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.216.226.69. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:38:29 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Danielle Gregorio Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.226.148. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:39:38 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Amanda Sanchez Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.80.37. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:41:24 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Donna Matson Anaheim, California 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.47.47.20. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:44:17 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Matthew Bolen Anaheim, State 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 73.34.17.201. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:53:14 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tami Cahill Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.90.72.144. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:05:12 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jim Herbeck Orange, Ca 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 96.3.203.74. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:19:26 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Trudee Ho Anaheim, Ca 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.42.17. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:20:59 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Katie Beavers Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.192.53.55. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:26:01 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, FRAN JUTZI ORANGE, CA 92868 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.214.152. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:27:02 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Michelle Coberly Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 199.247.103.84. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:28:49 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Paul Turek Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.147.222. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:34:35 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Victor Juan Anaheim, CA 92816 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.2.96.62. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:37:44 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Elizabeth Schroeder Villa Park, Ca 92861 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.240.216.144. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:50:41 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Pat Reeves ANAHEIM, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.232.147. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:51:55 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Helen Picolin ANAHEIM, CA 93808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.232.147. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:53:26 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Sylvia Pio Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 162.192.168.92. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:54:26 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Helga Reeves ANAHEIM, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.232.147. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:13:21 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Victor Dohleman Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 199.247.103.84. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:15:31 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kelly Coutts Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.240.79.252. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:16:35 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Steven Duffin Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.239.127. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:17:05 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Yolanda McDanel-Cornwell Orange, CA 92869-3747 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.23.90. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:23:39 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Becky Deihl Villa Park, Ca 92861 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.89.58.54. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:26:11 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Nicole Webber Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.231.197.13. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:43:30 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Brieana Hnatenko Yorba linda, CA 92887 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.197.128. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:47:14 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Brian Penny Anaheim, California 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.225.253. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:47:42 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Rick Deihl Villa Park, CA 92861 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.89.58.54. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:53:53 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Christine Deihl Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.68.197. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:59:11 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kimberly Otellio Orange, Ca 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.23.90. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:21:02 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kim Violette Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.124.224. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:22:36 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Sandra Fernandez Fullerton, CA 92831 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.249.152.21. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:38:39 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, L Weber anaheim, ca 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 38.95.110.74. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:39:08 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Michal Doesburg Orange, California 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.241.236.65. From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:48:14 AM Please do not close Jagerhaus. It is a historic gem and somewhere that generations of my family have loved to visit. We do not need another common strip mall to replace such a lovely establishment. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:49:44 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jessica Teets Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.79.180. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:55:03 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Carolyn Alley Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.47.44.188. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:57:33 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Michelle Terrazas Orange, Ca 92868 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.91.163.209. From: To:David See Subject:FW: Jagerhaus development Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:08:41 AM Sent via the Samsung Galaxy A10e, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Date: 9/13/20 11:06 AM (GMT-08:00 Subject: Jagerhaus development Dear Dave I am a local resident. I really enjoy the Jagerhouse restaurant. Please do not vote to replace it with a car wash. Convince store. Please vote to let the Jagerhause conceptual plan move forward. Thank you for your consideration, Carolyn Alley Anaheim resident 19 years. Anaheim CA 92806 714)366-7939 Sent via the Samsung Galaxy A10e, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:12:49 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Dee Stelling-Parker frisco, tx 75035 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.48.4.231. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:14:18 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Sarah Schmid Anaheim, Ca 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.64.62.138. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:19:55 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Rhonda Wright Sylmar, CA 91342-3451 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.67.183. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:24:17 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Judy La Magna Anaheim, Ca 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.22.247. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:26:44 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jennifer Shook Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 75.83.56.13. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:28:37 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Karin Shannon Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.131.117.45. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:39:29 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Erik Westenhofer Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.190.101.61. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:41:31 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kathy Williams Anaheim, Ca 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.237.108. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:57:12 AM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jamie Ramos Orange, Ca 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.121.126. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:00:13 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lore Flavell Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.33.15.132. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:11:45 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Celia Rolison Villa Park, CA 92861 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.208.194.222. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:13:18 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Brian Harralson Anaheim, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.228.197. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:15:16 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, GillianMay Lin Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.251.45. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:18:22 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Susanna Riley-Graham Anaheim, Ca 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.30.222. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:20:15 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lee Stevens Brea, California 92821 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.30.156. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:20:18 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Elaine Mouw Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.225.145.10. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:24:37 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Sheila Campbell Anaheim, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.177.188.173. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:24:52 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Diane Turnbaugh Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 162.204.133.129. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:40:30 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kathryn Davis Newport Beach, CA 92660 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.169.230.119. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:41:46 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Andrea Villegas Irvine, Ca 92618 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 24.155.244.82. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:45:49 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Amy Ojima Anaheim, Ca 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.216.224.194. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 12:47:03 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Michelle MacDonald Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.95.11.56. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:02:02 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Linda Lundquist y Anaheim, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.22.233. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:02:05 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Dianne Troge Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.191.136.230. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:03:39 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Michelle Aljilani Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.242.230. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:05:07 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Melissa Leimer Anaheim, Ca 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.77.229.108. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:11:31 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Maha Kosareff Anaheim, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.246.241. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:13:31 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Scott Carri Walnut, Ca 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.156.139.225. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:15:25 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Joanna Doo Anaheim, California 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.64.63.92. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:31:38 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Katheryn Wilson Orange, Ca 92966 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.94.131. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:32:51 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Andrea Horn Walnut, CA 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.156.137.235. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:32:52 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kori Kintsch Ladera Ranch, CA 92694 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 68.4.236.187. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:41:43 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Stephanie Reynolds Lakewood, Ca 90713 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.152.218.32. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:47:12 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Giselle Balanza Walnut, CA 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 24.25.205.77. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:55:25 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cynthia Hicks Orange, Ca 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.85.199. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:04:46 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Thomas Kupfrian Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.185.236. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:07:26 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Janna Brunner Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 64.58.138.98. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:07:57 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Christine Ywakiem Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.91.222.97. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:09:35 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Gabriella Rollins Yorba Linda, ca 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.206.124. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:15:25 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Theresa Lipari Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.22.7. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:16:27 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Timothy Doyle Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.22.7. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:16:42 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Vince Hung Walnut, CA 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 24.205.166.63. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:20:59 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Maggie Hung Walnut, Ca 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 24.205.166.63. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:22:09 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lynn Austin Riverside, California 92506 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 71.95.53.103. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:27:28 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jerome Reynolds Anaheim, Ca. 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.47.44.148. From: To:David See Subject:Plea to Spare Jagerhaus Restaurant Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:32:15 PM Dear Mr. See, I am writing to urge you to vote against the Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. We have been frequent diners at the Jägerhaus Restaurant, located at the above address. We are so pleased to find a unique, local eatery that serves authentic German food, something we’ve always enjoyed from our youth. The owner treats us like family and stops by our table at nearly every visit. We are always impressed at the number of people, often in larger groups, that are seated in abundance around us. Shops and restaurants that offer one-of-a-kind experiences are the backbone of our communities and country. We appreciate the mom-and-pop stores in our own town, Orange, and make it a point to visit our neighbors in Anaheim as well and give them our support so we can enjoy them for a long time, including our kids and grandkids. We have nothing against car washes and convenience stores. They serve us well and are also a part of the community. But to remove a long-time establishment, and a tribute to the area’s German heritage, would be a great loss. In our previous home, in the Bay Area, we had to say “no” to a charter school that wanted to set up shop in the church behind our backyard. We strongly support charter schools and don’t like to decline their desire to settle near us, but the dynamics of the neighborhood would change so much with traffic and congestion it would reduce the quality and potential safety of the area. As with the church, some things are best left alone to continue offering their great value to our community. Please make that the case with Jägerhaus and have the other businesses settle in another location. Thanks very much! Sincerely, David and Tonya McPherrin From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:35:57 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Valerie Lasseter Anaheim, Ca 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 173.31.253.19. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:39:02 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Anne Phu Walnut, CA 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.155.248.89. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:42:17 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Robert Nisle Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.231.200.192. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:45:36 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jan Crocker Placentia, CA 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.27.183. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:45:37 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tina Nelissen Anaheim, Ca 92817 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.21.249.251. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:49:48 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Shelley Ferris Riverside, Ca 92505 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 96.40.185.226. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:54:18 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Joshua Augenstein Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.95.10.109. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:57:12 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tim Miller Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.22.216.225. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 2:59:03 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Joan Crooks Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.255.112.221. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:07:28 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Denise Tomlinson Riverside, California 92509 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 137.25.172.114. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:21:07 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Robert Nelissen Anaheim, Ca 92817 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.21.249.251. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:30:56 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Chris Hiett Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.91.218. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:41:00 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Karen Newsome Anaheim, California 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.91.32.241. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:41:30 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Richard Newsome Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.91.32.241. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:50:09 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Michael & Karen Bianchino Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.243.163. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 4:13:13 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kelly Cokely Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.208.104.170. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 4:14:57 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Scott Cokely Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.208.104.170. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 4:18:16 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Ben Bennett Bullhead City, Arizona 86429 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 67.143.208.146. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 4:20:48 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Robert Alexander Anaheim, Ca 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.91.164.30. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 4:22:11 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Maggie Goodson Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.234.89. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 4:22:24 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cindy Johnson Westminster, CA 92683 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.237.4.77. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 4:25:00 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jeremy Kies Anaheim, CA 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.202.51.46. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 4:40:57 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cynthia Smith Anaheim, CA 92806-5005 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 68.126.221.141. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 4:42:45 PM September 13, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Arlene Highlen Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.228.86. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:02:58 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Neal Ritter Anaheim, California 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 75.33.181.39. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:06:07 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Stephanie Fix Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.191.139.80. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:09:58 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Terry Topinio Anaheim, Ca 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.249.126.218. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:14:18 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Marcia Lichte Garden Grove, CA 92840 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 45.51.15.78. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:14:37 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kara Homolak Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.208.104.61. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:14:38 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jillian Thomas Placentia, Ca 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.89.34.206. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:14:58 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jill Tran Anaheim, Ca 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.89.34.206. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:23:47 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Theresa Preston Anaheim, Ca 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.178.58. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:44:44 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jan Jenks Walnut, CA 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.157.85.47. From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Community Support for Jägerhaus German Restaurant Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 5:55:44 PM Hello all, I hope you are doing well. I am writing to express support for Jägerhaus German Restaurant. As an Anaheim resident, I strongly object to the proposed car wash project that would be built in its place. As an authentic German restaurant, Jägerhaus is a celebration of Anaheim’s history. Our city is becoming increasingly known for its unique dining and beer. Jägerhaus fits right into the food and beer culture of today’s Anaheim while offering meals that would have been enjoyed by the German families who founded our city. It’s easy to see why Jägerhaus is a favorite destination for locals and visitors of all ages. For my own family, this is easily our favorite place to gather and enjoy a meal together. Losing Jägerhaus would be a tragedy for our city. Having it replaced by businesses that don’t reflect the desires of the local community would be extremely unfortunate. Rather than replace this beloved restaurant, Jägerhaus should expand beyond its current footprint to bring its German dining experience to an even larger scale. Please don’t let us lose this local gem. Sincerely, Ryan Sparks From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:06:04 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Peggy Calvert Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.31.231.185. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:07:25 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kyle Prichard Orange, CA 92867-2936 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 75.19.165.113. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:17:10 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Rosie Marta Orange, CA 92866 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.95.106. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:24:19 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Anita Twitchell Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.67.58.210. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:27:59 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Patrick Hanna Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.67.58.210. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:30:47 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Josef Schmid Anaheim, Ca 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.77.229.4. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:35:10 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tracy Perry Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.114.174.3. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:43:38 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lorie Sprague Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.77.76. From: To:John Armstrong; Kimberly Keys; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Save the Jagerhaus Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:14:22 PM Hello, I am writing to the planning commission members tonight to voice my support for saving the Jagerhaus instead of building another carwash in Anaheim. I am a local of Orange County, live in Orange near the Anaheim border and have been visiting Jagerhaus for almost 40 years of my life. It is a community institution, a place for locals and travelers alike to gather, and is important to maintain as a historical site. Anaheim was founded as a German village and to even consider replacing the Jagerhaus with a carwash is unfathomable. Anaheim needs more community gathering places, not less. Please consider approving the Jagerhaus' owners new site plan, which will undoubtedly bring more tax dollars to the city than a carwash. Thank you for your time, Amanda Wortman Orange, CA 92868 From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:36:18 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Donna West Anaheim, Ca 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.32.113.69. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:37:49 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kathryn Miller Cerritos, CA 90703 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.41.199.142. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:39:02 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jay Miller Cerritos, CA 90703 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.41.199.142. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 7:44:30 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Nicholas Virus Villa Park, Ca 92861 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.118.42. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:15:34 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Ronda Glenn Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.183.96. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:20:22 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Peggy Avila Brea, California 92821 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.149.152. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:25:53 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lorraine Hatchell Orange, Ca 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.243.139.14. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:31:40 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Gary & Grace Dresser . Walnut, CA 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 45.50.203.91. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:40:21 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Alexa Kandasamy Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 75.19.164.153. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:42:55 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Christy Rivers orange, ca 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.242.36.106. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:50:13 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Brandi Augenstein Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.95.10.109. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:50:45 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cheryl Smith Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.213.78. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:54:23 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Rebecca Segura Santa Ana, Ca 92706 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.243.192.91. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 8:57:52 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Carmen Mardan Anaheim, Ca 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.184.215. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:04:12 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Linda Burnett Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.211.237. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:04:31 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Bubba Lipscomb Orange, Ca 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.208.193.193. From: To:David See Subject:Please keep the Jagerhaus at it"s current location Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:09:22 PM Hello, I am writing to you as a loyal Jagerhaus customer, please keep the shopping center as it is on Ball Rd. This restaurant is a Gem to the local community and to residents that drive in from other cities for this unique menu and It would be great to keep it where it is. In my opinion another corner for a car wash and gas station placed in a different location would more than likely suit the community. Please help keep this restaurant where it is. Thank You, Michelle Nunez Santa Ana, CA 92706 From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:21:18 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kimberly Kietzke Placentia, CA 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.242.47.16. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:35:06 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Krista Faber Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 50.113.66.105. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:43:21 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Shelley Reyes Anaheim, CA 92804 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.170.85.249. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:52:57 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Donna Heinecke Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.91.32.237. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:26:33 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Holly Tallha Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 162.192.168.114. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:26:44 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Carol Davis Orange, California 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.203.2.22. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:44:33 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Melissa Jones Walnut, Ca 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.157.84.171. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:46:08 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lisa Greenshields Anaheim, CA 92806-2727 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.91.34.164. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:50:10 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Justine Roley Las Vegas, NV 89129 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 68.224.126.111. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:11:02 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Edward Evers Riverside, California 92505 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.153.247.92. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:20:53 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Laurie Palomino Haber Industry, Ca. 91744 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.147.21.188. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 12:25:30 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cheryl Pebley Anaheim, CA 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.202.153. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 12:27:42 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Erin MacDonald Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.236.112. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 12:57:18 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Brad McCown Walnut, California 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.156.141.232. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 1:27:16 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Natisha Moeder Springboro, Oh 45066 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 98.29.125.98. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 3:43:31 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Bonny schumacher newport. Beach, Ca 92660 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 72.194.112.213. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 4:49:39 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Wendy Teegarden las vegas, nevada 89139 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 68.108.79.57. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 7:06:52 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Carlos Cuesta , Anaheim, California 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 158.247.71.38. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 7:36:58 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Debbie Migala Walnut, CA 91789 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 71.80.177.101. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 7:40:02 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jessica Sweet Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.184.198.76. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 7:43:20 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, David Pulcini Brea, California 92821 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 45.51.77.20. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:05:25 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tamara Johnston Tustin, CA 92782 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.79.222.22. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:30:33 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Rachel & William Leo Fullerton, CA 92832 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 67.44.192.38. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:42:41 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Vicki Brigham Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.224.172.138. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:10:16 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Mariann Vlacilek Anaheim, CA 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.231.197.174. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:59:44 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Melanie Woods Chino, CA 91710 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.193.252.185. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:59:46 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Frank Feliz Anaheim, Ca. 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.91.220.142. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:53:09 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Shelley Faerber Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.186.23.65. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:54:27 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Don Fillion Lake elsinore, CA 92532 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.116.210.112. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 11:50:41 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Donavyn Suffel Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 66.27.186.197. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 11:54:39 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Tania Peredo Laguna Beach, California 92651 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 66.27.186.197. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 11:55:16 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Laura Kuntz Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.108.98. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 11:57:04 AM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Laura Orlow-Kojac Placentia, CA 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 216.85.5.244. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 12:04:33 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jim Bell Anaheim, California 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.91.222.138. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 12:04:53 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Elizabeth Gustafson Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.91.36.219. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 12:16:25 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Viktor Lazarev Anaheim Hills, California 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.21.241. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 1:01:57 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Karen Rowley Orange, CA 92865 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.40.67.123. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 1:02:56 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Curt Rowley orange, Ca 92965 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.40.67.123. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 1:21:56 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Gerald Woodward Cerritos, CA 90703 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.41.199.136. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 2:31:52 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kristi De Cew Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.179.252. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 3:10:44 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Ilona Plessney Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 68.109.95.174. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 3:11:53 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Eric Sabato Anaheim, Cailifornia 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.21.250.145. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 3:24:45 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jesus Becerra Anaheim, California 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.169.164. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 4:11:44 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Lauren Parsons . Chino hills, Ca 91709 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.151.240.27. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 4:12:19 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Gary De Cew Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.179.252. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 4:24:18 PM September 14, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Joseph Girtner . Brea, Ca. 92821 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.71.134.128. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 5:08:26 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Emili DeCew Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.179.252. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 5:11:23 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jennifer Reynolds Orange, CA 92865-3819 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 50.113.64.109. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 5:27:56 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cynthia Fitschen Orange, California 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.114.154. From:i To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 5:31:57 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Carol Phillipi Anaheim, California 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.170.198.70. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 5:33:51 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Susan Lindeman Chino, CA 91710 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.151.247.150. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 5:34:40 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Pete Phillipi Orange, California 92868 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.170.198.70. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 5:35:25 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Michelle Salinas Brea, Ca 92823 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.115.175.250. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 5:49:35 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Karen Poindexter La Canada, CA 91011 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 24.205.79.173. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:01:09 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, James Coletta Fullerton, Ca 92833 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.62.73.124. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:04:19 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Vivian Coletta Fullerton, Ca 92833 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.62.73.124. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:25:32 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Dianne Rusk Menifee, Ca 92584 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.145.1.155. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 6:47:20 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Andronikki Berry Huntington Beach, Ca 92649 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.112.198.37. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 7:15:24 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Gema Maleki Anaheim, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.250.126.1. From: To:David See Cc:jarms3534@aol.com; kimberly.key614@gmail.com; mileberman92805@gmail.com; natalieameeks@gmail.com; rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 7:27:51 PM Please! The City of Anaheim would greatly benefit from keeping this LONG time favorite German Restaurant! Anaheim started as a German Colony. It’s a one-of-a-kind restaurant now, but the new expansion plans for the corner of Ball and Sunkist into a unique German restaurant destination for Anaheim is a FANTASTIC idea. The only other city with this type of German restaurant is Old World Village, in Huntington Beach, and that city didn’t begin as a German Colony! It’s even great marketing to publicize Anaheim’s roots. Think about this...NOT one resident around the area of Ball and Sunkist wants an eye-sore car-wash to go into their neighborhood! Please consider this—PLEASE!! Respectfully, Geri Gollenger McGuff Anaheim raised, and Anaheim educated!! Sent from my iPhone From: To:Planning; David See; Planning Commission Subject:Protect Small Businesses! Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 7:35:36 PM I recently became aware of a proposed redevelopment project for the corner of Ball Rd. and Sunkist St. which would remove the existing businesses within that complex. I respect the property owners' right to decide how to best utilize this property. That being said I think it would be a shame for the surrounding community and the City of Anaheim both to lose some of its unique character and also not set an example of promoting small businesses that provide a better sense of community than larger franchise/corporate entities. My understanding is that the redevelopment project would include a car wash, a gas station and a 7-Eleven market. Although every business has a right to be given the opportunity to exist and compete, these are not businesses that are in high need within the community. There is a gas station just across a street from the proposed project. Less than a half mile away, just one major intersection away and less than a two minute drive away; you will find four major gas stations. One of those gas stations has an automated car wash. Right next to another one of those four gas stations you have a by hand car wash. And next to that car wash amongst the strip mall with other local businesses is a 7-Eleven market. So the local neighborhood is really in no need of more of the same. It could be understandable if few of these businesses existed in the area, but this area is already saturated with similar competing businesses. Instead the community would lose local small businesses which have become highly appreciated by the residents not just of the area, but also local residents in surrounding cities that have come to appreciate their services such as Ball Donuts and most notably the Jagerhaus which provides something unique and authentic which isn't commonly found. It really would be a shame to lose the Jagerhaus which is a dining experience that isn't easily replaced, for businesses of which we already have a fairly saturated market in the area. I really hope the city planners take these factors into consideration when making its decision, and add my voice to those that oppose a redevelopment project that would remove the Jagerhaus for a car wash/gas station. Thank you for your consideration in these matters. Christian Aviles Anaheim Resident From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 8:54:18 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Melojean Greenfield Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.176.87. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:31:24 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cesar Cortez Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.185.164.114. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 9:33:37 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Joni Gaynor Anaheim, Ca 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.95.11.72. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:03:45 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kim Vander Dussen Anaheim, California 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.176.60.230. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:14:07 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Phil Anton Redmond, WA 98052-1191 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.229.103.146. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 10:32:56 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Evan Lacey Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.216.224.107. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 14, 2020 11:05:18 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Courtney Burkes Placentia, CA 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.10.171.117. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 4:54:50 AM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, James Dominguez Cerritos, CA 90703 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.145.110.128. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7:36:00 AM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Johanna Puccio Orange, Ca 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.254.215.51. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:12:42 AM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Scott Hutcheson Costa Mesa, CA 92626 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.185.41.122. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:23:57 AM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Megan Hamrock Tustin, CA 92780 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 209.143.176.6. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 10:48:33 AM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Casey Philippi Anaheim, Ca 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.30.174. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:42:16 AM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Christie Contreras Anaheim, California 92804 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 107.77.230.189. From:Steve White To:David See Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11:42:44 AM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: linda bell Date: September 14, 2020 at 12:21:37 PM PDT To: "awhitste@pacbell.net" <awhitste@pacbell.net> Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Dear Sir, My husband & I moved to Anaheim 44 years ago (State College & Ball Road), just down from Jagerhaus. Please do not let another car wash, gas station or convenience store go in at that corner. Jagerhaus is respected & enjoyed by us all. Please rethink this & let it remain where it is. Thank you, Linda Bell Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:Steve White To:David See Subject:Fwd: Save the Jagerhaus! Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:59:53 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Casteel < Date: September 11, 2020 at 3:59:28 PM PDT To: awhitste@pacbell.net Subject: Save the Jagerhaus! To whom it may concern, Please do not tear down the Jagerhaus and replace it with a 7-11 / Car Wash! That is the LAST thing this city needs. Especially with the new renovation planned, the Jagerhaus would be an addition worlds above another chain corner store. Anaheim can honor its great German heritage with a beautiful beer garden and restaurant. For whatever it’s worth, I beg your consideration. Please. A concerned Anaheim resident, Michael Casteel From:Steve White To:David See Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:04:37 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Kevin Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:40:17 PM PDT To: awhitste@pacbell.net Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist We’ve been eating at this restaurant for the last 20 years. Please don’t tear it down for a car wash. We need people like the owner of this place to continue having businesses in our neighborhoods. Sandy is one of the good ones Sent from my iPhone From:Steve White To:David See Subject:Fwd: do not replace the Jagerhaus restaurant with a car wash Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:06:47 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Fran Long Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:01:22 PM PDT To: awhitste@pacbell.net Subject: do not replace the Jagerhaus restaurant with a car wash Dear Mr. White, I wish to add my objections to having the wonderful Jagerhaus restaurant replaced by a common car wash! We have been dining there for decades, as it is the best German restaurant in Southern California. I would hate to have to find a different restaurant that serves German food in a different city, as you probably need all the sales tax revenue you can get. Please do not get rid of my favorite restaurant in Orange County. There are dozens of car washes, but no equal restaurants where I can spend my money. Frances M. Long From:Steve White To:David See Subject:Fwd: Jagerhause Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:07:11 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Steve White <awhitste@pacbell.net> Date: September 15, 2020 at 1:06:53 PM PDT To: See David <dsee@anaheim.net> Subject: Fwd: Jagerhause Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Micki Olsen Date: September 11, 2020 at 2:01:09 PM PDT To: awhitste@pacbell.net Subject: Jagerhause As a long time resident of Anaheim, and patron of Jagerhaus our family is completely against the proposal for another car wash, 7eleven... We believe it is in the best interest of Anaheim to support our local business of the Jagerhaus, and go with their full remodel design! Cynthia Olsen Sent from my iPhone From:Steve White To:David See Subject:Fwd: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:08:01 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: jami villegas < Date: September 11, 2020 at 1:11:47 PM PDT To: awhitste@pacbell net Subject: Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Sent from my iPhone From: To:David See Subject:Jagerhaus Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:10:00 PM Dear Dave See, We have been going to the Jagerhaus on Ball Road for the last twenty plus years. We live in Chino Hills and have had family reunions and other gatherings at the Jagerhaus. Family from out of the area have stayed at hotels in Anaheim to attend our events. The Jagerhaus is an Anaheim treasure which brings folks from out of the area to Anaheim. No one will travel to Anaheim for a carwash or a Seven-Eleven, but they will remember their visit to Anaheim after visiting a unique restaurant in your city. Please remember your city’s citizens, tourists, and visitors who come to Anaheim to eat at the Jagerhaus. Thank You, Bill and Rachel Leo Chino Hills, CA From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 2:35:08 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jon Harmon Anaheim, CA 92804 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 162.206.31.81. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 2:43:43 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Raylene Thornton Orange, CA 92867 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 23.242.42.4. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 4:07:00 PM September 15, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Yvonne Ritter Anaheim, California 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.140.65. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 6:42:28 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Elisabeth Wallace Norco, CA 92860 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.8.28.55. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7:11:58 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Chad Mullen Anaheim, California 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.231.196.15. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7:44:05 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Dustin Shea Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.248.24.43. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8:35:05 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Rex Hall Anaheim, Ca 92806-4206 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.250.126.64. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 9:52:56 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kathleen Nelson Anaheim, California 92802 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.170.214.170. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 15, 2020 10:33:16 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Elizabeth Winkler Stanton, CA 90680 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.30.188.219. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 1:17:14 AM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Paige Gulley Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.60.181.0. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 4:08:20 AM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, William Toman Santa Maria, California 93454 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 98.234.207.176. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 6:59:53 AM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Marnie Barnhart Chino Hills, CA 91709 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.145.200.171. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 9:25:26 AM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kathy Shinomoto Anaheim, Ca 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 147.92.95.174. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 1:44:49 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Mary Prather Villa Park, CA 92861 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.89.48.234. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:30:45 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Cheryl Leising Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 47.34.236.188. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:55:33 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Susan Burk Anaheim, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 108.206.150.58. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:54:52 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Melanie Green Anaheim Hills, California 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.21.3.92. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 3:59:01 PM September 16, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Douglas Green Anaheim Hills, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.21.3.92. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 5:37:58 PM September 17, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Andrea Palombo-Carpenter San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 104.53.42.162. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 5:47:16 PM September 17, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Donnie La Curan Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.88.228.226. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 8:47:13 PM September 17, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Mary Lou Riddlebarger Brea, CA 92821-4355 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.219.71.16. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 10:01:49 PM September 17, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Nicole Geub Westminster, CA 92683 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 98.149.12.171. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 10:03:49 PM September 17, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kelly Murphy Anaheim, CA 92807 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.119.135.36. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 10:09:28 PM September 17, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jeanette Saldivar Anaheim, California 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.20.19. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 16, 2020 11:16:38 PM September 17, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Marita Tiller Wilsonville, OR 97070 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 50.53.197.44. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Thursday, September 17, 2020 5:59:00 PM September 18, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, George Feliz Oceanside, Ca 92057 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 68.6.137.156. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:17:12 PM September 18, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Todd Lockwood Anaheim, CA 92806 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 99.91.221.146. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Thursday, September 17, 2020 9:22:18 PM September 18, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Debbie Zachary Anaheim, Ca 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.216.226.140. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 18, 2020 8:42:18 AM September 18, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Rebecca Lackmann Placentia, CA 92870 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.119.116.28. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 18, 2020 11:01:19 AM September 18, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Kate Schlentz Yorba Linda, CA 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.217.31.63. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 18, 2020 11:05:14 AM September 18, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Greg Schlentz Yorba Linda, Ca 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 66.116.82.168. From: To:John Armstrong; kimberley.keys614@gmail.com; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Please Keep Jagerhaus at its Current Location Date:Friday, September 18, 2020 12:32:41 PM September 19, 2020 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 EastBall Road. Planning CommissionCity of AnaheimCity Hall200 S Anaheim Boulevard1st Floor, Suite 162Anaheim, CA 92805 Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, I have been a regular patron of Jagerhaus since the early 1980's when I worked at the Rockwell facility in Anaheim off of Miraloma Ave. My co-workers and I would lunch there frequently until the Rockwell facility closed in the early 2000's and moved to Huntington Beach. Since then my family has made Jagerhaus a frequent choice for dining in Anaheim, particularly prior to events at the Honda Center or Angel Stadium. Jagerhaus is a landmark and tradition for many residents of Anaheim and throughout Northern Orange County. It would be a sad day for the city and Anaheim residents if they were forced to close or relocate outside of Anaheim. In this difficult time for small businesses, particularly restaurants, is forcing the closing of a decades old dining tradition to be replace by another carwash really in the best interests of Anaheim and Orange County? Carwashes are a dime a dozen providing a generic service one can get in any city at any carwash. Obviously not true of Jaerhaus and the excellent food and atmosphere they provide. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. Thank You, Laurence Lackmann Placentia, CA 92870 From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 18, 2020 3:14:25 PM September 18, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Margaret Erdner Anaheim, CA 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.9.13.6. From: To:jarmst2534@ao.com; kimberley.keys614@gmail.com; Michelle Lieberman; natalieameeks@gmail.com; Rmulleady@aol.com; dhiruhv@gmail.com; Steve White; David See Subject:Save Jagerhaus German Restaurant Date:Friday, September 18, 2020 4:37:32 PM To all concerned, The iconic Jagerhaus German Restaurant deserves to stay where it is. No gas station / car wash should replace it. Small one of a kind businesses is what makes neighborhoods unique. Lover of German Food Ray Kula From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Friday, September 18, 2020 8:16:35 PM September 19, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, MaryAnn DiGiulio DiGiulio Anaheim, California 92801 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.183.218. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, September 21, 2020 10:57:57 AM September 21, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jennifer Maddron Anaheim, CA 92804 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.170.207.35. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 22, 2020 11:59:54 AM September 22, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Carolyn Everett Irvine, California 92620 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.19.242. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 22, 2020 1:42:09 PM September 22, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Alaina Clark Orange, CA 92869 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.58.23.77. From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Tuesday, September 22, 2020 5:31:49 PM Dave can you See Jagerhaus is an important business in our neighborhood. Please save our tastebuds for losing flavors that excite the palate Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Wednesday, September 23, 2020 5:32:32 PM September 24, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Manny Subia Santa Ana, California 92704 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 174.195.201.201. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, September 26, 2020 7:00:11 PM September 27, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Joan Dorsz Yorba linda, Ca 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.224.172.20. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, September 29, 2020 9:28:52 AM September 29, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Sabrina Heyden Rasband Temecula, Ca 92591 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.251.245.183. From: To:David See Subject:Save the Jägerhaus & Neighborhood at Ball & Sunkist Date:Thursday, October 01, 2020 10:56:28 PM Dear Dave, I'm a local that recently learned that Jägerhaus might be forced to shut down by the planning commission. As a German, I beg you to keep it open. I've lived in many places in the United States, it's very difficult to find authentic German cuisine. Jägerhaus is special and cannot ever be replicated once torn down, it would be a devastating loss to the community. It preserves our German heritage and is a neighborhood pillar. Please keep Jägerhaus open, I don't approve of yet another car wash/gas station/7- eleven that can be easily found everywhere. A concerned citizen, Kevin Brotcke From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, October 05, 2020 9:28:48 AM October 5, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Chris Ellerbeck Anaheim, CA 92804 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.43.186. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, October 05, 2020 6:27:10 PM October 6, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jennifer Palean ANAHEIM, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.188.154. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, October 05, 2020 6:27:10 PM October 6, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jennifer Palean ANAHEIM, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.188.154. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Tuesday, October 06, 2020 3:22:50 PM October 6, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Linda Hollinshead Yl, California 92886 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 76.225.147.124. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Saturday, October 10, 2020 12:53:59 AM October 10, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Briana Bell Los Angeles, Ca 90036 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 176.93.185.178. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Thursday, October 22, 2020 2:39:04 PM October 22, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Peter Westenhofer Orange, CA 92868 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.127.128. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, October 5, 2020 9:28:48 AM October 5, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Chris Ellerbeck Anaheim, CA 92804 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 172.90.43.186. From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Date:Monday, October 5, 2020 6:27:10 PM October 6, 2020 Planning Commission City of Anaheim City Hall 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Development Land Use Permit Application No. SUBPM2020-100 for Parcel No.: 25307219 for Property located at 2519-25 East Ball Road. Dear members of the Anaheim Planning Commission, Please accept this written communication as my public testimony before the commission and I respectfully request that it be recorded as a part of the public comment for the specific agenda item at the Commission’s Meeting where this item will be heard before the Commission. I am a customer and regular patron of Jagerhaus Restaurant. It has been a real pleasure for me to enjoy meals at this family-owned Anaheim restaurant which has been a pillar of our community for 35 years. The owners and staff of Jagerhaus provide a unique family friendly environment to enjoy good authentic German food that represents Anaheim’s early history as a haven for German immigrants who settled in this wonderful city so many years ago. Jagerhaus gives back to the community in so many ways. From supporting local community groups, to offering our community an affordable group meeting space and wonderful catering services, Jagerhaus is a local Anaheim treasure which is worthy of our city leaders to recognize and cherish. The many wonderful contributions this family business has made to our community are countless. The plans they have developed to rehab the center are beautiful and would add value and a sense of pride to the neighborhood. We support the current use as amended under their most recent development plan. It is my opinion that there is no need for another convenience store/gas station/car wash in this neighborhood as there are several similar uses located in the adjacent area. Please allow Jagerhaus to remain at its present location and I urge you to not approve any proposed development plan which results in the destruction or displacement of this beloved local community business which has served as an icon of Anaheim for over three decades. Losing this family-owned business would be a travesty not only to the neighborhood, but to all north Orange County. I respectfully request that you do not vote in favor of the applicant’s request for the convenience store/gas station/car wash project. Thank you for considering my request. Sincerely, Jennifer Palean ANAHEIM, CA 92805 -- This e-mail was sent via an email generation form on Safe Form (https://safeform.org) on behalf of the sender regarding Save the Jagerhaus from 70.93.188.154. 1 Wayne Carvalho From:Ted White Sent:Tuesday, November 05, 2019 7:06 PM To:David See; Wayne Carvalho Subject:Fwd: Developer Proposal of the 7 Eleven at Sunkist Plaza- Ball & Sunkist Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Wayne and Dave, A comment on the Ball/Sunkist 7-11 proposal. The respondent provides some substantive comments for the record. TW Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: TreeTop Branch Date: November 1, 2019 at 12:49:17 PM PDT To: Stephen Faessel <SFaessel@anaheim.net> Cc: Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim.net>, Amanda Edinger , Nam Bartash < Subject: Re: Developer Proposal of the 7 Eleven at Sunkist Plaza- Ball & Sunkist Thank you Councilman Faessel for your reply on the matter. I think value is important for any community and neighborhood. I believe in businesses like the Jaegerhaus restaurant where you eat Councilman. I believe that businesses like these in the plaza generate more revenue for the city than the gas station and car wash proposal. The business that are there currently are not failing or going out of business and continue to benefit this community like the Jaegerhaus restaurant that you go to. A value that all surrounding neighborhoods share. Hi Mr. White: I would like to share some of my thoughts regarding this 7 eleven proposal. Below are my thoughts on the proposal, looking at the perspective thru pro and cons: Pro: Facelift to a plaza that needs some improvement. I think everyone would agree on a facelift to the current plaza but changing it to another carwash and gas station is questionable. For this you must ask the question: Does this facelift offer value to the community or surrounding neighborhoods when there are already a carwash a block away and 5 gas stations within a block away? does this 7 eleven proposal really makes sense, business wise? Con: 2 -Loud noise which is yet to be studied with current noise of the off ramp and the vacuums with traffic going along the side of the residential homes. Also people conversation noise and music when they are cleaning their cars using the vacuum and possibly other equipments. What is the actual noise level when you add all those factors that actually defines a car wash? -Congestion on ball and Sunkist in an intersection that is highly congested already -Dangerous intersection of Hilda and Sunkist. Getting out of Hilda street to get onto Sunkist to enter 57 freeway. Currently no traffic light, dangerous already trying to merge onto Sunkist from Hilda st, timing the north and south bound traffic. -No value-added in another gas station and carwash when there are so many within a block away. Will the carwash a block away be impacted financially from this new carwash? How would this benefit the city of Anaheim? At least the other carwash does not affect the residential area due to its location. -Potential pollutants near residential area for gas station. Digging gas tank might impose a danger to residential homes near site if it leaks into soil. What is the environmental impact if a gas station is built or leaks? -Added traffic means added pollution to an area already have high pollution levels due to being next to the freeway and high congestion intersection. Have we measure what is the current pollution levels and add those additional factors with this gas station (fumes, detergents, etc..) and car wash ( detergents, additional traffic pollutants from cars constantly driving by along the walls of the residential homes. I may be missing other factors as well. -Potential increase in homelessness in that area due to 7 eleven store and gas station. Homeless people normally hang around these places for easy access to getting stuff from their checks or cashing it out at the 7 eleven stores and also bathroom access. Also they have access to people that get gas so pan handling is easier like the gas stations on ball and state college. I see them all the time asking people at the gas station. -Potentially drive out residents who will be impacted directly or indirectly from this proposal. From my perspective, I believe there are more Cons than Pros for this project and please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Also please feel free to share with me the additional Pros that you see from this proposal other than what I stated above. With these pros please compare it with current state versus future state so there is a visible comparison. I am interested in knowing what I could have overlooked so I can have a better understanding. Thank you and have a wonderful weekend! Tri Sent from my iPhone On Oct 30, 2019, at 4:59 PM, Stephen Faessel <SFaessel@anaheim.net> wrote: Good afternoon Tri: 3 Thank you for the note and the explanation of your location as it pertains to the proposed project. By way of response, I’m copying our Planning Director, Mr Ted White as well as my two City Council Aides. You will likely receive a note from one of our Planning Staff soon as there was some misinformation listed on the developers note that was distributed to the neighborhood. There is a neighborhood meeting now planned at the Sunkist Library on Thursday, November 14 from 6 to 7 pm, not the date listed on the flier. I’m aware of the property owner of the center has been trying to sell or lease the property for another use for some time. I understand that the current businesses are on a month to month tenancy and the property owner (not the business owners) have done little to improve the center. I’m a regular at Jaegerhaus. You and your neighbors should be certain to attend the 11/14 meeting and express your opposition to the project. This will likely come before the Planning Commission and depending upon what the developer wants to do, may or may not come before the City Council. I served on the Planning Commission for seven years and they are the first review for projects of this kind, if any permits or land use changes are considered. Incidentally, I’ve lived in the Magnet-Rio Vista neighborhood for 44years and am very familiar with our East Anaheim neighborhoods. Thanks for the note, I’ll share what I learn as to the timing of the proposed project as soon as Ivey more intel. Most respectfully, Steve Faessel District 5 Sent from my iPhone On Oct 29, 2019, at 12:51 PM, TreeTop Branch > wrote: Hi Councilman Faessel: My name is Tri Vu and I live at . My home is uniquely situated next to the 57 ball st off ramp and the Sunkist plaza where the proposal for a 7 eleven carwash and Gas station is considered. Currently there is a lot of noise coming from the off ramp already. The sounds of the off ramp is so loud that trucks drive thru and my windows vibrate, sometimes waking up my baby daughter. I can not imagine the additional noise with all the vacuum and traffic based on the layout that is proposed. Also it is already tough to get out of Hilda st to Sunkist 4 in the morning to enter the 57 freeway. There is so much traffic trying to get out of the street with traffic going toward the plaza. I can not imagine the bottleneck the proposed plaza will cause and the danger this poses to residents in my neighborhood whenever they get out of Hilda into Sunkist toward the 57 freeway entrance. There is no light and it is a dangerous intersection that is already at risk of a major accident. I feel like I am between two hard rocks with not much hope if this 7 eleven proposal is approved. I do not approve of the 7 eleven carwash and Gas station proposal. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best Regards, Tri Sent from my iPhone Question Report Report Generated:2/18/2021 9:02 Topic Webinar ID Actual Start Time # Question Community Meeting 250 981 1486 1601 2/17/2021 17:25 122 44 Question Details #Question Asker Name Answer(s) 1 Will this 7-11 be franchised or corporate?Kimberly Keys live answered 2 What is happening to Jeagerhaus?Elliott Brender live answered 3 A 7 eleven and carwash is NOT cleaning up our community Joe Ontiveros 4 Jagerhaus.Elliott Brender live answered 5 Has every opportunity to assist the relocation of the eight small business owners in the Center been exercised ?Joe Ontiveros live answered 6 In addition to this evening's community Webinar, and the meeting at the Sunkist Library in December, 2019, (excluding conversations with the adjacent neighbors regarding sound wall concerns) how many other community outreaches has the developer taken advantage of?Joe Ontiveros live answered 7 Has the Jaegerhaus successfully found a new location ?Joe Ontiveros live answered 8 why not just give the lot a face-lift? new pavement, updated modernized building?Joe Ontiveros live answered 9 Less than 0.4 miles away not to mention a 4.5 minute walk IS already a 7-11 and very popular Drive thru Carwash.Joe Ontiveros 10 Let's be frank but detailed why. How many of you have exited the Freeway during early morning traffic from the 57 to go westbound on ball crossing over Sunkist, its a bloody nightmare. Most of the time the light and traffic has one backed up from Sunkist and ball to the 57 exit, occasonally CHP has someone pulled over, in the parking lot for ticketing in the Jaugerhouse parking stalls, or various spots in the parking lot for traffic citations. How about the residence coming out from the trac area from Alki Place, S Hilda street trying to turn left onto Sunkist (clearly marked KEEP CLEAR) it never is clear and is even been More congested even after the lanes where widened. Its a traffic nightmare not to mention a hazardous turn to get onto Sunkist, so lets think how this will worsen the congestion and accidents as vehicles try and exit the 7 eleven and carwash and trac home residences simultaneouslyare trying to do the same. Let's think about the safety of the CHILDREN in the community Joe Ontiveros 11 Our community has seen 7-11s come into our neighborhoods and quickly become unkempt. I have a concern about how this 7-11 might be well maintained and what measures would be taken to keep it so?Anonymous Attendee live answered 12 Why do we need another car wash? There are plenty in our area! Have seen the one up by Polly`s Pies. Noisy and too busy for our area!!Barbara Hackworth live answered 13 now we're lookiing at sound issues with the classical music? One more source of additional noise? You playing 24/7?Diane McNall Actual Duration (minutes) Asker Email live answered 14 I request that the Sunkist exit be limited to right turn. A left turn onto Sunkist will cause danger to all drivers, accidents, injury and death.SUZANNE DEVANEY 15 If the progress of this project continues to stall, is there a contingency plan?Daniel Olson live answered 16 You had a Noise Consultant testify at the Planning Commission that Plexiglas had the same sound attenuation qualities as a concrete block wall. Please provide the documented proof from an industry recognized authoritative source that supports your claim.Joshua Augenstein live answered 17 cars lined up behind houses and pollution?Diane McNall live answered 18 no positive comments from homeowners. Renters may like it.Diane McNall 19 and the people living on Hilda will never be able to make a left turn onto Sunkist Diane McNall 20 As a way of discouraging loitering and homeless activities at other 7-11's, classical music is being played. How effective is this tactic in discouraging loitering and homeless encampments ?Anonymous Attendee live answered 21 Was the traffic study done during the last year when traffic was much reduced due to COVID lockdown?Anonymous Attendee live answered 22 This is right next to a residential neighborhood. what plans are there to limit or control fuel deliveries to the gas station as well as stock deliveries to the Convenience store?Joshua Augenstein live answered 23 Turning left from Hilda is dangerous, but I see an issue with people leaving the property, turning north on Sunkist and attempting a u-turn to return to Ball Road. Will that be addressed?Anonymous Attendee live answered ATTACHMENT NO. 4 24 We heard that the new drive through car wash on St College across from Northgate Market, built a 10-foot block Sound wall. Additionally, a recent similar car wash on Beach Blvd also had a 10-foot sound wall as well as having all the windows in the adjacent homes retrofitted with high sound suppressing Windows. Will you propose that to mitigate the noise of these adjacent residential neighbors?Joshua Augenstein live answered 25 How is the plexiglas maintained? Won’t it look bad after a few years?Anonymous Attendee live answered 26 We heard that there is contaminated soil condition under that parcel? Is that true? If so, what will you do to clean up the site and is there a report on the condition of the soil.Joshua Augenstein live answered 27 For customers leaving the center on the Sunkist Driveway, turning right (n/b) who eventually wish to actually travel S/b, how will U-turn traffic in the adjacent neighborhoods (all the way up to Wagner intersection) be prevented?Anonymous Attendee live answered 28 Can we have access to this classical music study?Diane McNall There is no official study, this is based off of in store experience. 29 I'm talking about neighbors and clcassical music, not customers Diane McNall live answered 30 noise pollution with cars lined behind houses Diane McNall live answered 31 Could the plan be changed to limit Sunkist exit to right turn? A left turn would be dangerous.SUZANNE DEVANEY live answered 32 How does the community benefit from yet another convenience store and a car wash? The saturation has already been noted time and time again, but why not something more useful to the residents? A Trader Joe’s? Something similar? Talk about a unique opportunity to put something in that would be a huge boost to the community, and be the only thing of it’s kind for miles in every direction Joshua Augenstein live answered 33 can you tell us how many people are present tonight?Diane McNall Hi Diane, we had 45 people registered. There are currently 28 people in attendence. 34 Will there be any traffic management provided on S/b Sunkist to prevent those exiting the center onto Sunkist from attempting to turn Left (across the N/b Sunkist Lane) to get into the Sunkist s/b left turn pocket? Conversely, how will S/b Sunkist drivers be prevented from crossing the N/B Sunkist lane to turn into the Sunkist driveway? Already this is a reverse issue for the ARCO station on the opposite side of the street. Will a U-turn still be allowed on the S/b Sunkist-Ball Road intersec Joshua Augenstein live answered 35 Have any of the current businesses found a new location?Anonymous Attendee All business are in the process at various stages, when approved by the city it will be a few month before the existing center is closed. 36 Perfect plan for an industrial area away from neighors' backyards Diane McNall 37 thank you, Brooke Diane McNall You're welcome. 38 I continue to be concerned about the additional 1500 trips into this property and how it might affect the traffic on an already extremely busy street. Accidents happen daily and the driveway traffic will be beyond the safety threshold of the city’s requirement. How might this be mitigated?Kimberly Keys live answered 39 I can think fo 3 express car washes within 2 miles Diane McNall 40 Will your restrooms be avaible for anyone or just customers?Anonymous Attendee live answered 41 what about the horn echo of cars when people lock there cars to enter the store?Joe Ontiveros live answered 42 Anaheim PD has a 'No Trespassing Letter' program that allows PD to arrest loiterers hanging out at a facility. That program requires the property or business owners to resubmit the letter each year. Will 7-11 and the car wash agree to keeping 'No Trespassing Letters' updated with PD and agree to press charges on loiterers that do end up being arrested? This program has proven highly effective at other properties.Anonymous Attendee live answered 43 Why would you be so sure Anaheim will approve the project? That would assume they would ignore the more than 1000 written community objections to the project.Anonymous Attendee live answered 44 where are the dumpsters going to be located ?Joe Ontiveros live answered Veneklasen Associates Consultants in Acoustics | Noise | Vibration | AV | IT 1711 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica California 90404 • tel: 310.450.1733 • fax: 310.396.3424 • www.veneklasen.com February 5, 2021 Golcheh Group 1180 Beverly Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90035 Attention: Shira Zaghi Subject: East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Barrier Modification Acoustical Assessment Veneklasen Project No. 7431-001 Dear Shira: Veneklasen Associates, Inc. (Veneklasen) provides the following comments for the subject project as it relates to the increase in the barrier wall height at the north property between the proposed gas & wash and the residences to the north and the acoustical impacts associated with the increase: A.Barrier Height Increase. The effective sound barrier height of the wall at the north property line is proposed to increase from 8 feet to 12 feet in height. We have assessed this difference within our acoustical model developed for the project. Our assessment is provided below: Table 1 – Additional sound level reduction provided by 4-foot barrier height increase Receivers Additional Sound Level Reduction R1 to R4 1-3 dB R5 to R8 0-2 dB 1.The reason for the lesser reduction at properties R5 to R8 is due to the already planned 9-foot barrier at the car wash tunnel exit, which provides significant reduction from the blowers. Thus, sound due to operations reaching the property line to the north is already reduced by the time it reaches the 12-foot barrier. B.Barrier Material. The additional material for the sound barrier to extend the height is intended to be a plexiglass material. We understand there is concern regarding the difference between plexiglass and the already planned CMU wall. Veneklasen provides the following comments: 1.In an outdoor, free-field setting, sound energy passing through a barrier (i.e. sound transmitted) is far less significant than sound passing over the top of it (i.e. sound diffracted). Per the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “Usually it is assumed that the sound transmitted through a barrier is negligible relative to that which is diffracted over the top, i.e., the sound transmitted is at least 20 dB below that diffracted”. 2.Veneklasen has calculated the level of sound transmitted for both a 12-foot CMU wall and an 8-foot CMU wall with a 4-foot plexiglass extension. Results have been shown in the table below, which demonstrate that the level of sound transmitted is at least 20 dB below the lowest sound level modeled (46 dBA), which would represent the sound diffracted: Table 2 – Calculated sound level due to sound transmission through barrier vs. over barrier Barrier Condition Sound Level Through Barrier, dBA Sound Level Over Barrier, dBA 12-foot CMU 21 ≥ 46 8-foot CMU + 4-foot Plexiglass 25 ≥ 46 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 Veneklasen Associates East Ball Road Gas & Car Wash; Anaheim, California Barrier Modification Acoustical Assessment; Veneklasen Project No. 7431-001 February 5, 2021; Page 2 of 2 Month Day, Year; Page 2 of 2 www.veneklasen.com If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Veneklasen Associates, Inc. Chris Kezon Senior Associate ATTACHMENT NO. 6 City of Anaheim Community & Economic Development Department Relocation Assistance for Anaheim Businesses located in Sunkist Plaza (2501 - 2525 E Ball Rd, Anaheim, CA 92806) Last Updated: April 5, 2021 Status Updates for Sunkist Plaza Tenants Tenant #: Address: Business Name: Business Type: Year: SQ FT: Contact Name: Status of New Location: Additional Notes: 1 2501 His Nibs Liquor Liquor Store 2001 3,136 Elias In progress - Sent commercial report with available units in Anaheim 2 2507 Home Master Legal and Financial Consulting 2004 1,400 Fadi Mahassel In progress - Sent commercial report with available units in Anaheim Recipient of $10,000.00 Anaheim Small-Business Grant Program. 3 2503 Mechlor Bakery Bakery/Panaderia 2003 1,344 Miguel Gonzalez In progress - Sent commercial report with available units in Anaheim Pending lease in Anaheim Town Square Shopping Center (State College and Lincoln Ave.) 4 2517 Ace Flowers Flower Shop 2005 1,120 Mrs. Kim In progress - Sent commercial report with available units in Anaheim 5 2509 New Look Beauty Beauty Salon 2004 840 Rosalinda In progress - Sent commercial report with available units in Anaheim 6 2505 Sunkist Donut Donut Shop 1988 1,120 Sam Shutdown business operations permanently. 7 2519 - 2525 Jaegerhouse German Resturant Restaurant 2000 4,480 Sandra Schwaiger Signed 10-year lease at 30 S. Anaheim Blvd. Recipient of $10,000.00 Anaheim Small-Business Grant Program. Currently working with assigned business solutions specialist for development on conceptual plans. New location will have a German Deli and restaurant. 8 2515 West Way Cleaners Drycleaning Services 2005 1,120 Sara Song In progress - Sent commercial report with available units in Anaheim ATTACHMENT NO. 7 SL P B CT V B T S P B WM TS P B I C V 10 0 . 8 7 T D C T V B IC V I C V I C V W M IC V IC V WM W MIC V CT V B TS P B IC V IC V I C V 10 1 . 8 8 I C V 10 2 . 4 7 T S P B IC V 10 3 . 6 4 S PB SLPB TSPBSLPB T S P BSLPB S IC V T 4 5 ' C 4 5 '9 0 ' S U N K I S T S T R E E T BA L L R O A D C 5 3 ' 5 5 ' 1 0 8 ' F D B R A S S D I S K W E L L M O N U M E N T , P E R C O R N E R R E C O R D 2 0 1 3 -1 5 0 5 A COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF ANAHEIM N 7 9 % % D 3 8 ' 5 3 ' ' E 1 8 8 . 5 1 ' N 5 3 % % D 2 0 ' 0 7 ' ' E 2 5 8 . 8 8 ' N 5 3 %%D 2 0 '0 7 ''E 7 3 .7 2 ' AP N : 2 5 3 - 0 7 2 - 0 1 8 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2 T R . N O . 6 9 3 1 L O T 3 2 M . B . 3 1 4 - 2 1 - 2 2 T R . N O . 6 9 3 1 L O T 3 9 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2 T R . N O . 6 9 3 1 L O T 3 4 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2 T R . N O . 6 9 3 1 L O T 3 7 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2 T R . N O . 6 9 3 1 L O T 3 5 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2TR. N O . 6 9 3 1LOT 3 0 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2 T R . N O . 6 9 3 1 L O T 3 6 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2 T R . N O . 6 9 3 1 L O T 3 8 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2 T R . N O . 6 9 3 1 L O T 3 3 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2 T R . N O . 6 9 3 1 L O T 3 1 M .B . 3 1 4 -2 1 -2 2TR. N O . 6 9 3 1LOT 2 9 PA R C E L C 6 16 FH F F F LO A D I N G A R E A PA T H O F T R A V E L P A T H O F T R A V E L DI S P 2 DI S P 4 9 DI S P 6 10 DI S P 1 DI S P 3 DI S P 5 11 1 2 7 8 5 6 3 4 1 2 CA N O P Y E D G E CA N O P Y E D G E C A N O P Y E D G E C A N O P Y E D G E SL A B E D G E SL A B E D G E S L A B E D G E S L A B E D G E RA M P 4, 3 8 1 s q f t 3, 1 0 3 s q f t C A N O P Y C O V E R A G E CA R W A S H T U N N E L P. O. S . VE N D I N G OF F I C E EQ U I P M E N T VA C U U M A R E A 12 ' O . C . (1 9 ) S P A C E S SI G N MO N U M E N T TR A S H E N T R Y E X I T EMPLOYEE PARKING (3 ) TR A S H EQ U I P . VA C TR X 48 " W I D E U N O B S T R U C T E D W A L K W A Y 0 Fo o t c a n d l e s c a l c u l a t e d a t g r a d e Scale 1" = 30'6 0 1 20 Il l u m i n a t i o n r e s u l t s s h o w n o n t h i s l i g h t i n g d e s i g n ar e b a s e d o n p r o j e c t p a r a m e t e r s p r o v i d e d t o Cr e e L i g h t i n g u s e d i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h l u m i n a i r e te s t p r o c e d u r e s c o n d u c t e d u n d e r l a b o r a t o r y co n d i t i o n s . A c t u a l p r o j e c t c o n d i t i o n s d i f f e r i n g fr o m t h e s e d e s i g n p a r a m e t e r s m a y a f f e c t f i e l d re s u l t s . T h e c u s t o m e r i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r ve r i f y i n g d i m e n s i o n a l a c c u r a c y a l o n g w i t h co m p l i a n c e w i t h a n y a p p l i c a b l e e l e c t r i c a l , li g h t i n g , o r e n e r g y c o d e . 92 0 1 W a s h i n g t o n A v e , R a c i n e , W I 5 3 4 0 6 h t t p s : / / c r e e l i gh t i n g . c o m - ( 8 0 0 ) 2 3 6 - 6 8 0 0 CR E E G H T IN G L I __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A C O M P A N Y O F ID E A L I N D U S T R I E S , I N C . Layout By: B ill Schubert Date:2/3/2021 Fi l e n a m e : 7 1 1 - 2 1 0 2 0 3 A N C A B R S . A G I Pr o j e c t N a m e : 7 - E l e v e n # 1 0 4 3 1 4 6 S u n k i s t S t . & B a l l R d . A n a h e i m , C A SR 3 4 5 2 5 7- E L E V E N S T OR E Ad d i t i o n a l E q u i p m e n t : (4 ) P D - 1 H 4 B Z S i n g l e h o r i z o n t a l t e n o n s (2 ) X A - S P 2 B L S B a c k l i g h t s h i e l d s (4 ) S S S - 4 - 1 1 - 1 7 - C W - B S - O T - N - B Z 1 7 ' X 4 " X 1 1 g a S q u a r e s t e e l p o l e s ( + 3 ' a f g b a s e ) ** * P r o p o s e d p o l e s m e e t 1 4 0 m p h w i n d z o n e r e q u i r e m e n t s ** * C U S T O M E R T O V E R I F Y O R D E R I N G I N F O R M A T I O N A N D CA T A L O G U E N U M B E R P R I O R T O P L A C I N G O R D E R * * * BO M : C o m p l e t e P a r t D e s c r i p t i o n 1 8 C P Y 2 5 0 - B - D M - F - 1 3 L - U L - W H - 5 7 K - H Z 6 C P Y 2 5 0 - B - D M - F - C - U L - B Z - 5 7 K - H Z 4 X S P L G - D - H T - 4 M E - 2 4 L - 5 7 K 7 - U L - B Z - N 3 X S P W - B - W M - 3 M E - 2 L - 5 7 K - U L - B Z 6 X S P W - B - W M - 3 M E - 4 L - 5 7 K - U L - B Z 4 P D - 1 H 4 B Z 2 X A - S P 2 B L S 4 S S S - 4 - 1 1 - 1 7 - C W - B S - O T - N - B Z 8' B l o c k W a l l MH : 1 6 CP Y 1 3 L CP Y C MH : 1 0 XS P L G - 4 M E MH : 2 0 XS P L G - 4 M E MH : 2 0 XS P L G - 4 M E - B MH : 2 0 MH : 2 0 XS P L G - 4 M E - B MH : 1 2 XS P W 3 M E 2 L MH : 1 2 XS P W 3 M E 4 L XS P W 3 M E 4 L MH : 1 2 MH : 1 2 XS P W 3 M E 4 L 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 7 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 6 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 7 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 5 1 . 1 2 . 3 3 . 6 3 . 5 2 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 5 1 . 2 2 . 5 3 . 7 3 . 1 1 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 7 1 . 2 2 . 4 3 . 7 4 . 6 4 . 4 3 . 6 2 . 2 1 . 1 0 . 8 1 . 3 2 . 8 3 . 7 4 . 8 4 . 0 3 . 3 1 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 1 . 1 2 . 0 4 . 7 5 . 3 6 . 3 6 . 1 5 . 7 4 . 0 1 . 7 1 . 3 2 . 2 5 . 5 5 . 1 6 . 4 5 . 8 6 . 1 3 . 1 1 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 2 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 9 2 . 7 5 . 2 5 . 9 8 . 8 8 . 9 5 . 7 4 . 4 2 . 1 1 . 7 2 . 6 5 . 7 6 . 2 8 . 0 8 . 2 6 . 0 3 . 5 1 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 6 1 . 1 2 . 1 3 . 2 3 . 8 3 . 8 4 . 0 4 . 2 4 . 0 3 . 9 4 . 0 3 . 7 3 . 6 5 . 2 8 . 0 6 . 2 6 . 4 7 . 7 4 . 1 2 . 0 1 . 6 2 . 4 5 . 4 7 . 6 6 . 0 6 . 7 7 . 1 3 . 2 1 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 1 . 0 2 . 4 6 . 0 1 1 . 3 1 3 . 1 1 1 . 6 1 2 . 6 1 3 . 9 1 2 . 2 1 2 . 0 1 3 . 4 1 0 . 9 6 . 9 6 . 1 4 . 5 4 . 1 4 . 0 4 . 3 4 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 8 4 . 5 3 . 6 4 . 2 4 . 0 4 . 6 3 . 7 1 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 6 1 . 5 4 . 4 1 4 . 3 3 2 . 4 3 7 . 4 2 8 . 5 3 3 . 1 3 9 . 0 3 1 . 0 3 0 . 0 3 8 . 2 2 9 . 6 1 3 . 0 5 . 6 3 . 4 3 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 9 3 . 3 2 . 9 2 . 7 3 . 2 3 . 5 3 . 9 4 . 1 3 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 3 1 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 8 1 . 9 6 . 1 2 1 . 2 4 9 . 2 5 6 . 7 4 2 . 4 4 9 . 5 5 8 . 9 4 6 . 2 4 4 . 7 5 7 . 9 4 4 . 5 1 7 . 6 5 . 8 2 . 9 2 . 5 2 . 8 3 . 4 4 . 5 4 . 9 4 . 7 4 . 4 4 . 1 5 . 1 5 . 3 4 . 4 2 . 3 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 2 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 9 2 . 1 6 . 6 2 2 . 4 5 1 . 8 5 9 . 7 4 4 . 7 5 2 . 1 6 2 . 0 4 8 . 7 4 7 . 2 6 0 . 9 4 6 . 7 1 8 . 3 5 . 7 2 . 7 2 . 6 5 . 6 1 2 . 8 1 7 . 9 1 7 . 6 1 1 . 1 8 . 6 7 . 6 9 . 5 7 . 7 4 . 5 2 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 9 2 . 0 5 . 7 1 8 . 2 4 1 . 7 4 7 . 9 3 5 . 5 4 1 . 7 4 9 . 7 3 9 . 0 3 7 . 7 4 9 . 0 3 7 . 5 1 4 . 7 4 . 9 2 . 8 4 . 6 1 6 . 8 7. 0 4 . 0 1 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 2 0 . 3 0 . 6 1 . 1 2 . 0 4 . 3 1 0 . 2 1 9 . 2 2 1 . 8 1 8 . 1 2 0 . 0 2 2 . 8 1 9 . 3 1 9 . 1 2 2 . 5 1 7 . 7 8 . 4 3 . 8 3 . 1 7 . 7 2 5 . 9 7. 4 3 . 9 1 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 2 0 . 3 0 . 8 1 . 7 2 . 6 3 . 6 5 . 3 7 . 5 8 . 0 7 . 6 7 . 5 8 . 2 8 . 1 8 . 0 8 . 4 7 . 2 4 . 7 3 . 4 3 . 4 8 . 2 2 3 . 0 7. 8 4 . 1 1 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 2 0 . 3 0 . 8 2 . 2 4 . 4 3 . 8 4 . 9 5 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 2 3 . 7 4 . 3 6 . 2 5 . 3 5 . 7 5 . 0 5 . 2 4 . 2 3 . 2 6 . 4 1 7 . 9 6. 5 3 . 5 1 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 2 0 . 3 0 . 8 2 . 1 5 . 4 7 . 7 6 . 3 7 . 3 7 . 6 3 . 9 2 . 7 3 . 1 5 . 9 8 . 3 6 . 6 7 . 2 7 . 6 3 . 8 3 . 2 4 . 6 9 . 7 3 . 9 2 . 4 3 . 5 3 . 9 2 . 3 3 . 5 3 . 2 7 . 2 3 . 5 1 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 3 0 . 8 2 . 2 5 . 7 6 . 3 8 . 1 8 . 3 6 . 4 3 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 8 5 . 8 6 . 4 8 . 6 8 . 7 6 . 3 3 . 9 3 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 2 2 . 6 2 . 7 2 . 1 2 . 4 3 . 1 3 . 8 2 . 7 1 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 6 1 . 7 4 . 7 4 . 4 5 . 8 5 . 0 5 . 3 2 . 8 1 . 6 2 . 0 4 . 7 4 . 5 5 . 8 5 . 1 5 . 3 3 . 2 2 . 2 2 . 3 2 . 2 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 8 2 . 2 1 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 Lu m i n a i r e S c h e d u l e Sy m b o l Qt y La b e l Ar r a n g e m e n t Ca l c u l a t i o n S u m m a r y ( F o o t c a n d l e s c a l c u l a t e d u s i n g i n i t i a l l u m e n v a l u e s @ 2 5 ° C ) La b e l Un i t s LM F Lu m . L u m e n s Av g Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Ca l c P t s Fc 4. 4 3 Lu m . W a t t s Pa r t N u m b e r 62.0 0.0 N.A.N.A. Ga s C a n o p y Fc 44 . 5 2 62.0 28.5 1.56 2.18 CP Y 2 5 0 - B - D M - F - C - U L - B Z - 5 7 K - H Z 18 CP Y 1 3 L SI N G L E 1. 0 0 0 12 8 2 5 91 CP Y 2 5 0 - B - D M - F - 1 3 L - U L - W H - 5 7 K - H Z Si t e Fc 5. 6 9 18.3 1.6 3.56 11.44 6 CP Y C SI N G L E 1. 0 0 0 45 2 0 31 2 XS P L G - 4 M E SI N G L E 1. 0 0 0 23 8 0 0 18 4 XS P L G - D - H T - 4 M E - 2 4 L - 5 7 K 7 - U L - B Z - N 2 XS P L G - 4 M E - B SI N G L E 1. 0 0 0 17 4 0 0 18 4 XS P L G - D - H T - 4 M E - 2 4 L - 5 7 K 7 - U L - B Z - N 3 XS P W 3 M E 2 L WA L L M O U N T 1. 0 0 0 24 9 0 19 XS P W - B - W M - 3 M E - 2 L - 5 7 K - U L - B Z 6 XS P W 3 M E 4 L WA L L M O U N T 1. 0 0 0 42 7 0 31 XS P W - B - W M - 3 M E - 4 L - 5 7 K - U L - B Z Si t e Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 5 . 6 9 Ma x i m u m = 1 8 . 3 Min i m u m = 1 . 6 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 3 . 5 6 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 1 1 . 4 4 Ga s C a n o p y Il l u m i n a n c e ( F c ) Av e r a g e = 4 4 . 5 2 Ma x i m u m = 6 2 . 0 Min i m u m = 2 8 . 5 Av g / M i n R a t i o = 1 . 5 6 Ma x / M i n R a t i o = 2 . 1 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln N NOT TO SCALE Site Plan PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Thursday, February 4, 2021 02 - BUILDING FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln Saturday, December 5, 2020 S Section N N Elevation S S Elevation W W Elevation E E Elevation 139'-6" 29'-4" 12 ' - 8 " 20 ' - 1 0 " 9' - 1 " 34'-7" 5'4"25' 5'18'-8"24'-51/2"5' 4' - 8 " 9' - 3 " 3' - 6 " 9' - 3 " 25'-6" 4,381 sq ft TUNNEL EXIT 3070 METAL DOOR ACCESSIBLE ALL GENDER RESTROOM UTILITY TRENCH CONVEYOR TRENCH OFFICE / FLIGHT DECK OFFICE / MEZZANINE ACCESS SPIRAL METAL STAIR CARD READER SLANTED STOREFRONT WINDOWS (TYP) MAIN STRUCTURE COLUMN 3070 METAL DOOR 3670 SERVICE DOOR CAR WASH TUNNEL (EQUIPMENT BY CAR WASH MANUFACTURER) EQUIPMENT ROOM WITH MEZZANINE ABOVE BUILT WITH STEEL OPEN GRATES ROOF PROJECTION FULL HEIGHT WIND BREAK SEPARATION WALL TUNNEL ENTRANCE 3070 METAL DOOR (2) PAY STATIONS PRICE BOARD (2) AUTOMATIC GATES FIX WINDOWS 3070 ALUMINUM DOOR WITH GLASS RAIN DOWNSPOUTS (TYP) EDGE OF ROOF PROJECTION 11'-6 H CMU ENCLOSURE WITH A ROLL-UP DOOR AND 3080 DOOR SLANTED STOREFRONT WINDOWS & LOUVERS(TYP) VENDING MEZZANINE ACCESS METAL LADDER DRIVEWAY LIMITS RAIN DOWNSPOUTS (TYP) WASH AREA DRY AREAPREP AREA 9'-0" H CMU SOUND WALL SCE TRANSFORMER CENTRAL VACUUM EQUIPMENT 1 0 0 ' 9 0 ' 6 0 ' 5 0 ' 4 0 ' 3 0 ' 2 0 ' 1 0 ' 0 ' 1 5 0 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 2 0 ' 1 1 0 ' E-C2036 115' DUAL TRANSPORTER 30" BELT E-EM-208-LCD ENTRANCE MODULE W/LCD DISPLAY E-P2007-K BUG, BODY, & BACKEND AUTOPREP ARCH (TRIPLE PRESOAK W/CTA) E-C-MG-Dg-3x10 MOLDED PIT GRATING E-C-SG-Dg-3X10 SOLID PIT GRATING E-P2011 UNDERBODY BLASTER E-M1001-NC-G ALL-IN-ONE EXTREME CLEAN COMBO MODULE-NO CLOTH E-T1001 RAINBOW COAT APPLICATOR KIT E-P-RHL RED HOT LAVA APPLICATOR KIT E-F-RB-2-LR1 RAIN BAR 2 ROW W/ LADDER RACK BRACKETS E-HW-204 SIMONIZ HOT WAX AND SHINE W/RAIN BAR APP. E-F2016-LG BARE TOMMY ARCH (7) E-B2008 DIRECT MOUNT BLOWER ARCH (15) P-B-BB-3 HORIZONTAL BLOWER BRACE BAR 3' (16) E-B-BP-10-Red BLOWER PRODUCER 10hp E-F2010-K HP RINSE TEARDROP ARCH KIT E-F-RB-4-LR1 RAIN BAR 4 ROW W/ LADDER RACK BRACKETS E-F2036-K FIXED ROCKER BLASTER E-H2005-K FLIPPING WHEEL BLASTER E-F-ICEDTD TURTLE WAX ICE TEARDROP ARCH E-M1001-NC-G ALL-IN-ONE EXTREME CLEAN COMBO MODULE-NO CLOTH E-F-RB-2-LR1 RAIN BAR 2 ROW W/ LADDER RACK BRACKETS E-F2001-K CURVED HANGING RINSE KIT E-F2010 APPLICATOR ARCH-TEARDROP STYLE E-F2017-2 RINSE WALL RING E-F1007-LM-DB TIRE BLAZE APPLICATOR-LEG MOUNT E-B2009-NC-K DRYING REVERSE HUGGER KIT LADDER-RACK LADDER RACK SYSTEM E-SE-1005-2 RELAX/GO LED LIGHT STAND 1 0 ' 6 ' 2 5 ' - 6 " 1 ' - 6 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 2 ' - 6 " 3 ' 4 ' - 6 " 2 ' 4 ' 2 ' - 8 " 2 ' 5 ' 5 ' 3 ' 3 ' 3 ' 3 ' 3 ' 5 ' 5 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 0 ' 7 0 ' 8 0 ' 5 8 1 O t t a w a A v e . H o l l a n d , M I 4 9 4 2 3 P . 6 1 6 . 4 9 4 . 0 7 7 2 t o m m y c a r w a s h . c o m T o m m y C a r W a s h S y s t e m s C o p y r i g h t 2 0 1 5 A l l R i g h t s R e s e r v e d D a t e : E Q U I P M E N T L A Y O U T D R A W I N G # : T C W - 1 1 R A P I D S E X P R E S S 2 . 1 7 . 1 6 3 '-1 /2 " 10 ' LED WALL PACK LIGHTS GUTTER ACRYLITE ROOF PANELS STEEL BEAMS EXTRUTECH CAR WASH PANELS OFFICE / FLIGHT DECK SLANTED WALL CONVEYOR TRENCH FOOTINGS ROOF ACCESS CAR GATE PAY STATIONTW 17 ' - 9 1/ 2 " 19 '-2 1 /2 " 20 ' 9' FLASHING CAP (TYP) P.O.S. ALUMINUM WINDOWS WITH TEMPERED GLASS HVAC EQUIPMENT BEHIND 3' H PARAPET WALL AUTOMATIC GATE LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT ) CMU SOUND WALL 4" JOINT IN-FILL A BCDHA B TW C F E E 9' FLASHING CAP (TYP) ALUMINUM LOUVERS ALUMINUM PANELS SAME COLOR AS "B" LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT )CMU SOUND WALL 4" JOINT IN-FILL D B TW H BF BE E 19 ' - 2 1/ 2 " 10 ' 20 ' P.O.S. AUTOMATIC GATES RING AND OVERHEAD DOOR BY TOMMY WASH 2" STUCCO SCREED BA FC EG 12 ' 6' 17 '-9 1 /2 " 19 '-2 1 /2 " 9' 7' 4' RING AND OVERHEAD DOOR BY TOMMY WASH SUNBURST W/ 2" STUCCO SCREED LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT ) LED SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT ) 9' h X 25' L CMU SOUND WALLCLEAR ADA WALKWAY VACUUM CANOPY STALL F BCB EG 10'METAL FRAMED MONUMENT SIGN WITH CONCRETE BASE BUSINESS LOGO/NAME B N SCALE: 1" = 10' Floor Plan SCALE: 1" = 10' Section SCALE: 1" = 10' S Elevation SCALE: 1" = 10' N Elevation SCALE: 1" = 10' E Elevation SCALE: 1" = 10' W Elevation SCALE: 1" = 10' Monument Sign A 26 GA METAL TRIM OVER FOAM TIGER DRYLAC 38/60500 NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 B 30/30 STUCCO COLORTEK RAL 3001 (COLOR) C D STOREFRONT ALUMINUM FRAME LOW-E GLASS METALLIC SILVER E SPLIT - FACED CMU BLOCK RCP BLOCK & BRICK COLOR/STYLE CHARCOAL F METAL DOOR AND FRAME TIMELY CHARCOAL GRAY MATTE DESIGNER'S FOAM NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 26 GA STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF & FASCIA TIGER DRYLAC 38/60500 NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 G ACRYLITE HEATSTOP ACRYLIC ROOF PANEL CLEAR H LIST OF MATERIALS CAR WASH EQUIPMENT POWDER COATED STEEL BY TOMMY WASH - RAL 3001TW 03 - MISC SYSTEMS New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln Saturday, December 5, 2020 © 2015 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. Project Name Fixture Type Catalog # 06/09/15 DOE LIGHTING FACTS Department of Energy has verified representative product test data and results in accordance with its Lighting Facts Program. Visit www.lightingfacts.com for specific catalog strings. SMARTTEC™ - LSI drivers feature integral sensor which reduces drive current, when ambient temperatures exceed rated temperature. ENERGY SAVING CONTROL OPTIONS – DIM – 0-10 volt dimming enabled with controls by others. BLS – Bi-level switching responds a 120-277V signal from separate controller or sensor (by others). Low light level decreased to 30% maximum drive current. OCCUPANCY SENSOR (IMS) - Optional internal passive infrared motion sensor activates switching of luminaire light levels. High level light activated and increased to full bright in 1-2 seconds upon detection of motion. Low light level (30% maximum drive current) activated when target zone is absent of motion activity for ~ 2 minutes and ramps down (10-15 sec.) to low level. Sensor located on the front of optical assembly. Sensor optic has a detection cone of approximately 45°. Examples of detection - occurs 30’ out from a 30’ mounting height pole. EXPECTED LIFE - Minimum 60,000 hours to 100,000 hours depending upon the ambient temperature of the installation location. See LSI web site for specific guidance. LEDS - Select high-brightness LEDs in Cool White (5000K) or Neutral White (4000K) color temperature. 70 CRI. DISTRIBUTION/PERFORMANCE - Types 3, FT and 5. Exceptional uniformity creates bright environment at lower light levels. Improved backlight cutoff minimizes light trespass. HOUSING - One-piece, die-formed aluminum, weather-tight housing contains factory prewired driver and field connections. Extruded one-piece EPDM gasketed wiring access door (with safety lanyard) located underneath and utilizes tool-less thumbscrew fastener. OPTICAL UNIT - Clear tempered flat glass lens sealed to aluminum optics housing creates an IP67 rated, sealed optical unit (includes pressure-stabilizing breather). Optical unit is recessed into housing cavity and sealed to the housing with extruded one-piece EPDM gasket. Optical unit lanyard serves dual purposes of safety and provides positive ground between unit and housing. MOUNTING - Tapered rear design allows fixtures to be mounted in a quad pattern without the need for extension arms. Use with 3” reduced drilling pattern on round and square poles. A round pole plate (X4RPP, X5RPP) is required for mounting to round poles. Wall mount available by ordering wall mounting bracket (BKS-XBO-WM-*-CLR). See Accessory Ordering Information chart for all brackets. ELECTRICAL - A terminal block for attachment of incoming primary wiring is supplied. Two- stage surge protection (including separate surge protection built into electronic driver) meets IEEE C62.41.2-2002, Location Category C. Available with universal voltage power supply 120-277VAC (50/60Hz input), and 347-480 VAC. Optional twistlock photocell receptacle is available. Photocell must be ordered separately. DRIVER - Available in SS (Super Saver) and HO (High Output) drive currents (Drive currents are factory programmed). Components are fully encased in potting material for IP65 moisture resistance. Driver complies with IEC and FCC standards. Driver and key electronic components can easily be accessed. OPERATING TEMPERATURE - -40°C to +50°C (-40°F to +122°F). FINISH - Fixtures are finished with LSI’s DuraGrip® polyester powder coat finishing process. The DuraGrip finish withstands extreme weather changes without cracking or peeling. WARRANTY - LSI LED fixtures carry a limited 5-year warranty. PHOTOMETRICS - Please visit our web site at www.lsi-industries.com for detailed photometric data. SHIPPING WEIGHT (in carton) - 39 lbs. / 17.7 Kg LISTING - ETL listed to U.S. and International safety standards. Suitable for wet locations. For a list of the specific products in this series that are DLC listed, please consult the LED Lighting section of our website or the Design Lights website at www.designlights.org. LED AREA LIGHTS - AEROMAXTM MEDIUM (XAMU) US patent 7828456, 7952293, 8002428 and CAN 2693131 & 2701653 and US & Int'l. patents pending Type 3 Type FT Type 5 SS HO SS HO LIGHT OUTPUT - XAMU Lumens (Nominal)# ofLEDS Watts(Nominal) Co o l Wh i t e 13500 16500 12400 15000 14100 17300 13200 15800 12100 14800 11200 12500 139 176 139 176 128 128 128 128Ne u t r a l Wh i t e LED Chips are frequently updated therefore values may increase. This product, or selected versions of this product, meet the standards listed below. Please consult factory for your specific requirements. ARRAFunding Compliant wet location IP65IP67 Fixtures comply with ANSI C136.31-2010 American National Standard for Roadway Lighting Equipment - Luminaire Vibration 3G requirements. Baja Expree Carwash Site XAMU-FT-LED-128-HO-CW-UE-BRZ-IMS WITH 18' 4"X4" POLE The Philips Gardco 161 is an enlarged and enhanced version of the 121, providing performance capability up to that of 400w metal halide, while using considerably less energy. The 161 is designed for mounting heights from 15 to 20 feet, and may make it possible to reduce total pole requirements on a site due to the exceptional performance capability. The 161 style makes it a perfect companion to PureForm site luminaires. The sloped surface ribs of the die cast aluminum housing create a distinctly unique aesthetic element, and perform important functions in the Philips Gardco thermal management system. The high performance LED optical systems produce full cutoff performance, minimizing glare and light trespass. High performance, sleek profile LED wall mount luminaire. 161 WALL SconcE AVAILABLE Q3 2013 Benefits • Exceptional performance can reduce pole requirements on a site • Motion response and control options available for additional energy savings • Performance equivalent to 400W HID while utilizing significantly less energy Features • Complements the 121 Wall sconce • Perfect companion to Philips Gardco PureForm site & area luminaires • Type 2, 3, and 4 optical distributions available • Full cutoff performance minimizes glare and light trespass © 2015 LSI INDUSTRIES INC. Project Name Fixture Type Catalog # 06/09/15 TYPICAL ORDER EXAMPLE: LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION XAMU FT LED 128 HO CW UE WHT PCR ACCESSORY ORDERING INFORMATION1 (Accessories are field installed) Description LUMINAIRE EPA CHART - XAMU Single D180° D90° T90° TN120° Q90° 1.4 2.8 2.4 4.0 4.0 4.7 Note: House Side Shield adds to fixture EPA. Consult Factory. Prefix FinishColorTemperature XAMU LED 128 CW - Cool White (5000K) NW - Neutral White (4000K) Input Voltage UE - Universal Voltage (120-277) 347-480 - Universal Voltage (347-480V) BLK - Black BRZ - Bronze GPT - Graphite MSV - Metallic Silver PLP - Platinum Plus SVG - Satin Verde Green WHT - White Optional Sensor/OptionsOptional ControlsLightSourceDistribution# ofLEDs SS - Super Saver HO -High Ouput DriveCurrent 3 - Type III 5 - Type V FT - Forward Throw Sensor IMS - Integral Motion Sensor5 Options PCR - Photoelectric Control Receptacle6 Wireless Control System1,2 ((blank) - None PCM - Platinum Control System PCMH - Host/Satellite Platinum Control System GCM - Gold Control System GCMH - Host/Satellite Gold Control System DIM - 0-10 volt dimming (required for satellite fixtures) Stand-Alone Control (blank) - None DIM - 0-10 volt dimming3 (from external signal) BLS - Bi-level Switching4 (from external signal - required 120-277V controls system voltage) Order Number Description Order Number BKA-XBO-EC-6-CLR 6" Extension Arm 382136CLR BKS-XBO-WM-*-CLR Wall Mounting Bracket 382132CLR XAMU-HSS House Side Shield (Black only) 524670BLK7 X4RPP Round Pole Plate for 4" Poles 379967CLR X5RPP Round Pole Plate for 5" Poles 379968CLR PC120 Photocell for use with PCR option (120V) 1225148 PC208-277 Photocell for use with PCR option (208V, 240V, 277V) 1225158 PC347 Photocell for use with PCR option (347V) 1595168 PC480 Photocell for use with PCR option (480V) 12251808 FK120 Single Fusing (120V) FK1209 FK277 Single Fusing (277V) FK2779 DFK208, 240 Double Fusing (208V, 240V) DFK208,2409 DFK480 Double Fusing (480V) DFK4809 FK347 Single Fusing (347V) FK3479 PMOS120 120V Pole-Mount Occupancy Sensor 518030CLR10 PMOS208/240 208V, 240V Pole-Mount Occupancy Sensor 534239CLR10 PMOS277 277V Pole-Mount Occupancy Sensor 518029CLR10 PMOS480 480V Pole-Mount Occupancy Sensor 534240CLR10 FOOTNOTES: 1- For wireless controls information and accessories, see Controls section. 2- Requires a SiteManager and override switch. Not compatible with BLS or IMS option. 3- Not compatible with IMS or BLS option. 4- Not compatible with wireless controls system, DIM or IMS option. 5- Not compatible with wireless controls system, DIM or BLS option. 6- Photocell must be ordered separately. See Accessories. 7- House Side Shields add to fixture EPA. Consult factory. 8- Factory installed PCR option required. See Options. 9- Fusing must be located in the hand hole of pole. 10- To be used in conjunction with any of the PCM/GCM wireless controls systems in fixture. Consult factory. LED AREA LIGHTS - AEROMAXTM MEDIUM (XAMU) DIMENSIONS (shown with PCM/GCM controls) Front View Side View Bottom View 1-9/16"(39 mm) 6-3/8"(161 mm) 35-7/16"(900 mm) 5"(127 mm) 12-3/4"(324 mm) 18-5/16"(465 mm) XAMU HSS - House Side Shield Baja Expree Carwash Site XAMU-FT-LED-128-HO-CW-UE-BRZ-IMS WITH 18' 4"X4" POLE Dimensions Distribution Options Ordering information Prefix Distribution LED Wattage LED Type Voltage Finish Options 161-CWL 161-MR 161-DCC 161-DIM 161-APD 161-APD-MRI 2 Type 2 3 Type 3 4 Type 4 350 mA 70W 64 LEDs 110W 96 LEDs 530 mA 130W 64 LEDs 170W 96 LEDs 700 mA 150W 64 LEDs 220W 96 LEDs CW 5700K NW 4000K WW 3000K UNV 120-277V HVU 347-480V 120 208 240 277 347 480 BRP Bronze BLP Black WP White NP Natural OC Optional Color SC Special Color F Fusing 120-277V DL Diffusing Lens PCB1 Button Photocell WS Surface mount conduit feed junction box SPR Surge Protection (120-277V) SPRH Surge Protection (347-480V) 1. Not available in 347-480V. 13.86” 35.2 cm 22.4” 56.89 cm 8.02” 20.37 cm 13.86” 35.2 cm 22.4” 56.89 cm 8.02” 20.37 cm 161 WALL SconcE © 2013 Koninklijke Philips Electronics n.V. All rights reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. Philips Lighting company 200 Franklin Square Drive Somerset, nJ 08873 Phone: 855-486-2216 www.philips.com/luminaires Philips Lighting company 281 Hillmount Road Markham ON, Canada L6C 2S3 Phone: 800-668-9008 www.philips.com/luminaires Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 AVAILABLE Q3 2013 SINGLE USER PALM ARCH AT ENDS OF PARKING SPACES DUAL USER PALM ARCH BETWEEN PARKING SPACES 6" OVERHEAD ALUMINUM TUBING BETWEEN ARCHES ADJUSTABLE CROSS BARS (11'-16') 16'-6'Lx7'-2"Wx4"H FLAT AND LEVEL FLOOR SPACE FOR VACUUM EQUIPMENT 6" SCHEDULE 40 SOLID CORE BURIED PVC PIPE 6" SCHEDULE 40 SOLID CORE BURIED BACKUP PVC PIPE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6" CLEAN OUT BACKUP PIPE STUB UP LOCATION 6" CLEAN OUT 6" CLEAN OUT GENERIC LOCATION OF PRODUCER ROOM F.G. 0' - 0"0' - 2 " 1' - 1"2' - 6" 0' - 6 " 0' - 1 0 " 3' - 4 " 4' - 9 " 6' - 0 " 8' - 1 " 8' - 1 0 " 9' - 5 " 11 ' - 0 " 14' - 1"1' - 10" 1' - 4" 2' - 2" 8' - 4 " 6" OVERHEAD ALUMINUM TUBING 4' LED LIGHT STRAND AIR GUN W/ AIR HOSE WASTE RECEPTACLE CREVICE VACUUM TOOL CLAW VACUUM TOOL MAT RACK 1 1/2"x15' VACUUM HOSE DUAL USER PALM ARCH LED Site LightingLED Wall Sconce Lighting NOT TO SCALE GENERIC CENTRAL VACUUM SYSTEM Point of Sale Vending Area Trash Enclosure Vacuum Area Sound Wall 04 - MATERIALS New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln Saturday, December 5, 2020 PROTOTYPE REFERENCE IMAGE RAL_3001_-_Signal_Red_grande A B C D E F G H LIST OF MATERIALSTW SHADE CLOTH - FABRIC TEXTILENE FR STEEL GRAY CANOPY LIGHT POLES CHARCOAL GRAY MATTE 26 GA METAL TRIM OVER FOAM TIGER DRYLAC 38/60500 NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 30/30 STUCCO COLORTEK RAL 3001 (COLOR) STOREFRONT ALUMINUM FRAME WITH LOW-E GLASS METALLIC SILVER SPLIT - FACED CMU BLOCK RCP BLOCK & BRICK COLOR/STYLE CHARCOAL METAL DOOR AND FRAME TIMELY CHARCOAL GRAY MATTE DESIGNER'S FOAM NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 26 GA STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF & FASCIA TIGER DRYLAC 38/60500 NAVAJO WHITE 60+/-5 ACRYLITE HEATSTOP ACRYLIC ROOF PANEL CLEAR POWDER COATED STEEL BY TOMMY WASH - RAL 3001 SIGN VACUUM STALLS 05 - VEHICLE CUEING SYSTEM (1) New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln Saturday, December 5, 2020 N (Overlay) CUE Floor Plan 3,222 sq ftCOVERAGE 10 ' 17 ' - 6 " CUE LINES AT EVERY 20 FEET FOR (10) VEHICLESPRIOR TO TUNNEL ENTRANCE CUE LINES AT EVERY 20 FEET FOR (25) VEHICLESPRIOR TO P.O.S. 4,381 sq ft CAR WASH TUNNEL P.O.S. VENDING OFFICE EQUIPMENT VACUUM AREA (17) SPACES 12' O.C. MONUMENT SIGN TRASH EN T R Y EX I T (3) EMPLOYEE PARKINGC-STORE E BALL RD VAC TRX 48" WIDE UNOBSTRUCTED WALKWAY 06 - VEHICLE CUEING SYSTEM (2) New Automatic Car Wash 2525 E Ball Rd Anaheim CA 92806 USA | AP# 339-161-09 GV Anaheim Site-10.pln Saturday, December 5, 2020 N (Overlay) CUE Floor Plan 0 4'8'16' 3,222 sq ftCOVERAGE 10 ' 17 ' - 6 " CUE LINES AT EVERY 20 FEET FOR (10) VEHICLESPRIOR TO TUNNEL ENTRANCE CUE LINES AT EVERY 20 FEET FOR (25) VEHICLESPRIOR TO P.O.S. 4,381 sq ft CAR WASH TUNNEL P.O.S. VENDING OFFICE EQUIPMENT VACUUM AREA (17) SPACES 12' O.C. MONUMENT SIGN TRASH EN T R Y EX I T (3) EMPLOYEE PARKINGC-STORE E BALL RD VAC TRX 48" WIDE UNOBSTRUCTED WALKWAY T (800) 236-6800 T (800) 473-1234 US: creelighting.com Canada: creelighting-canada.com Rev. Date: V16 03/02/2020 Ordering Information Example: CPY250-B-DM-D-A-UL-SV CPY Series - Version B CPY250® LED Canopy/Soffit Luminaire CPY250 B Product Version Mounting Optic Lumen Package/ Input Power Designator Voltage Color Options CCT Options CPY250 B DM Direct HC Hook & Cord PD Pendant D 0.91" (23mm) Drop Lens F Flat Lens A 60W 13L 91W B 96W C 31W E 145W F 85W UL Universal 120-277V UH* Universal 347-480V - Available with B, E & F input power designators only - Must specify either 34 or 48 voltage with 13L, A and C 34* 347V - Available with 13L lumen package and A & C input power designators only 48* 480V - Available with 13L lumen package and A & C input power designators only BK Black BZ Bronze SV Silver WH White 30K 3000K 40K 4000K 57K 5700K DIM 0-10V Dimming - Control by others - Refer to Dimming spec sheet for details - Can't exceed wattage of specified lumen package/ Input Power Designator HZ Class I, Div. 2 Hazardous Location Certification - Available with DM and PD mounts only - A & C input power designators are available for DM and PD mounts except PD mount with 34 & 48 voltages in Canada - Not available with K or PML options K NSF 2 Certification - Luminaires include NSF certification mark - Available with the DM mount only - Not available with the HZ or PML options PML Programmable Multi-Level - Available with UL voltage only - Refer to PML spec sheet for details Product Description The CPY250® LED Canopy/Soffit Luminaire has an extremely thin profile constructed of rugged cast aluminum. It can be surface mounted easily from below the canopy deck and can be pendant mounted. Direct imaging of the LEDs is eliminated with a highly efficient patterned flat or 0.91" (23mm) drop glass lens. Applications: Petroleum canopies, CNG fueling stations, soffits Accessories Field-Installed Direct Mount Luminaires Canopy Upgrade Kits (18 ga. steel, except where noted) CPY-AP304* - for use with Cree Lighting CAN-304 luminaires, 16 ga. 5052 aluminum XA-BXCCMW – for use with Jet-Philips, 21.60" (549mm) square, white XA-BXCCNW – for use with Elsco Franciscan, 22.06" (560mm) square, white XA-BXCCPW – for use with LSI Dakota or Masters, 22.50" (572mm) square, white XA-BXCCQW – for use with Whiteway Riviera or Rig-A-Lite, 20.60" (523mm)square, white XA-BXCCRW – for use with Elsco Merrit, 18.06" (459mm) square, white XA-BXCCSW – for use with LSI Richmond or Whiteway Civic, 23.00" (584mm) L x 13.00" (330mm) W, white Direct Mount Junction Box/Stem Kit XA-BXCCJBOX – 6.0" (152mm) H x 3/4" (19mm) NPT Stem - Watertight - Rated for feed through 8 (4 in, 4 out) #12 AWC conductors Direct Mount Beauty Plates XA-BXCCBPW – 26.17" (665mm) Beauty Plate Only (18 ga. steel), white XA-BXCCBPB12W – 26.17" (665mm) Beauty Plate (18 ga. steel) w/12" (305mm) Backer Plate (16 ga. steel), white - For use in canopies where deck opening is larger than what is required for mounting the CPY250 luminaire. Maximum deck opening 10.75" x 15" (183mm x 375mm) XA-BXCCBPB16W – 26.17" (665mm) Beauty Plate (18 ga. steel) w/16" (406mm) Backer Plate (16 ga. steel), white - For use in canopies where deck opening is larger than what is required for mounting the CPY250 luminaire. Maximum deck opening 12" x 15" (305mm x 375mm) Pendant Mount Luminaires Pendant Mount Kits XA-PS12KIT* – 5" (127mm) pendant XA-PS18KIT* – 11" (279mm) pendant XA-PS22KIT* – 15" (381mm) pendant - Includes two conduit fittings and 3/4-14 NPT pipe threaded on two ends Hand-Held Remote XA-SENSREM - For successful implementation of the programmable multi-level option, a minimum of one hand-held remote is required Assembled in the U.S.A. of U.S. and imported parts Initial Delivered Lumens: Up to 20,080 Efficacy: Up to 151 LPW CRI: Minimum 70 CRI CCT : 3000K (+/- 300K), 4000K (+/- 300K), 5700K (+/- 500K) Limited Warranty†: 10 years on luminaire/10 years on Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish IP66 Rated (Direct Mount only) Class I, Division 2 Hazardous Location for select models Performance Summary Drop Lens Flat Lens DM Mount Gasket to Sealup to 4.25" (108mm)Canopy Cutout 3/4" (19mm) NPT Conduit Entry Mounts with (4) Supplied Self-Sealing Sheet Metal Screws 0.91"(23mm) Drop Lens 15.0"(382mm)7.2"(183mm) 11.0"(279mm) 2.0" (50mm)Flat Glass Lens † See http://creelighting.com/warranty for warranty terms * Must specify color: BK (Black), BZ (Bronze), SV (Silver) or WH (White) Weight 12.5 lbs. (5.7kg) * 13L lumen package and A & C input power designators utilize a magnetic step-down transformer. For input power for 347 and 480V, refer to the Electrical Data table T (800) 236-6800 T (800) 473-1234 US: creelighting.com Canada: creelighting-canada.com Product Specifications CONSTRUCTION & MATERIALS • Slim, low profile design • Easy mounting and servicing from below the deck • Luminaire housing is constructed of rugged cast aluminum with integral heat sink specifically designed for LED • Flat lens is 0.125" tempered Solite® glass • Drop lens is 0.157" molded borosilicate glass • Direct mount is suitable for use in single or double skin canopies with a minimum 4.0" (102mm) wide panels and a minimum 22 gauge, 0.030" (0.7mm) canopy thickness • Direct mount luminaire mounts directly to the canopy deck with the drilling of a single 2" to 4" (51mm to 102mm) round hole, is secured in place with self-sealing screws that provide a weathertight seal and includes 3/4” (19mm) conduit entry for direct wire feed • Hook and cord mount includes a 3' (0.91m) cord out of the luminaire and is intended to hang from the single hook • Standard pendant mount includes a mounting bracket and a J-Box for customer wiring and is intended to be mounted by 3/4 IP pendant (by others) • Hazardous location pendant mount has a threaded hub which accepts 3/4" NPT conduit (by others) and secures with a 1/4"-20 set screw • Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish features an E-Coat epoxy primer with an ultra-durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. Black, bronze, silver and white are available • Weight: 12.5 lbs. (5.7kg) ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Input Voltage: 120-277V or 347-480V, 50/60Hz, Class 1 drivers • Power Factor: > 0.9 at full load • Total Harmonic Distortion: < 20% at full load • Integral 6kV surge suppression protection standard • When code dictates fusing, a slow blow fuse or type C/D breaker should be used to address inrush current CONTROLS • Continuous dimming to 10% with 0-10V DC control protocol • 10V Source Current: 0.15mA • Use only lighting controls with neutral connection or controls intended for use with LED fixtures • Reference LED Dimming spec sheet for additional dimming information REGULATORY & VOLUNTARY QUALIFICATIONS • cULus Listed • Suitable for wet locations when ordered with DM and DM mount with HZ option. Covered ceiling required only when not used with cULus Listed, wet location junction box or XA-BXCCJBOX accessory • Suitable for damp locations when ordered with HC and PD mounts. Designed for indoor use only • Suitable for wet locations when ordered with PD mount and HZ option • Enclosure rated IP66 per IEC 60529 when ordered with DM mount. Exceptions apply when HZ option is selected • Consult factory for CE Certified products • 6kV surge suppression protection tested in accordance with IEEE/ANSI C62.41.2 • Meets FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class A limits for conducted and radiated emissions • Luminaire and finish endurance tested to withstand 5,000 hours of elevated ambient salt fog conditions as defined in ASTM Standard B 117 • Meets Buy American requirements within ARRA • RoHS compliant. Consult factory for additional details • Class I, Division 2 Hazardous Location rated when ordered with the DM or PD mount and the HZ option. A & C input power designators are available for DM and PD mounts except PD mount with 34 & 48 voltages in Canada. Not available with K or PML options. Rated for Groups A, B, C & D. Bears a T3C (160˚C) temperature classification within a 25˚C ambient • NSF Certified when ordered with DM mount and K option. Not available with HZ or PML options. Refer to http://info.nsf.org/Certified/Food/ for additional details • DLC and DLC Premium qualified versions available. Please refer to https:// www.designlights.org/search/ for most current information • Dark Sky Friendly, IDA Approved when ordered with 30K CCT and Flat Lens (F). Please refer to https://www.darksky.org/our-work/lighting/lighting-for- industry/fsa/fsa-products/ for most current information • CA RESIDENTS WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm – www.p65warnings.ca.gov 1 Lumen maintenance values at 25˚C (77˚F) are calculated per IES TM-21 based on IES LM-80 report data for the LED package and in-situ luminaire testing. Luminaire ambient temperature factors (LATF) have been applied to all lumen maintenance factors. Please refer to the Temperature Zone Reference Document for outdoor average nighttime ambient conditions. 2 In accordance with IES TM-21, Reported values represent interpolated values based on time durations that are up to 6x the tested duration in the IES LM-80 report for the LED. 3 Estimated values are calculated and represent time durations that exceed the 6x test duration of the LED. Electrical Data* Lumen Package/ Input Power Designator System Watts 120-277V System Watts 347-480V; 347/480V Total Current (A) 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V A 60 68 0.51 0.29 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.14 13L 91 102 0.79 0.45 0.39 0.34 0.30 0.21 B 96 96 0.82 0.47 0.40 0.35 0.28 0.20 C 31 33 0.26 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.07 E 145 145 1.22 0.70 0.61 0.53 0.42 0.30 F 85 85 0.72 0.41 0.36 0.31 0.24 0.18 CPY250® LED Canopy/Soffit Luminaire - Version B * Electrical data at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual wattage may differ by +/- 10% when operating between 120-277V or 347-480V +/- 10% CPY Series (Version B) Ambient Adjusted Lumen Maintenance1 Ambient Lumen Package/ Input Power Designator Initial LMF 25K hr Reported2 LMF 50K hr Reported2 LMF 75K hr Estimated3 LMF 100K hr Estimated3 LMF 5˚C (41˚F) A/B/C/E/F 1.03 1.00 0.96 0.93 0.90 13L 1.04 1.01 1.00 0.98 0.97 10˚C (50˚F) A/B/C/E/F 1.02 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.89 13L 1.03 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.96 15˚C (59˚F) A/B/C/E/F 1.02 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.89 13L 1.02 0.99 0.98 0.96 0.95 20˚C (68˚F) A/B/C/E/F 1.01 0.98 0.95 0.91 0.88 13L 1.01 0.98 0.97 0.95 0.94 25˚C (77˚F) A/B/C/E/F 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.90 0.87 13L 1.00 0.97 0.96 0.94 0.93 30˚C (86˚F) A/B/C/E/F 0.99 0.96 0.93 0.90 0.87 13L 0.99 0.96 0.95 0.93 0.92 Operating Temperature Range Lumen Package/ Input Power Designator Direct Mount to Plywood Direct Mount to Sheet Metal/ Suspended Class 1, Division 2 Hazardous Location Direct Mount to Plywood Direct Mount to Sheet Metal/Suspended A -40˚C to +40˚C -40˚C to +45˚C -40˚C to +25˚C 13L/B -40˚C to +35˚C -40˚C to +40˚C C -40˚C to +45˚C -40˚C to +50˚C E -40˚C to +35˚C -40˚C to +40˚C F -40˚C to +40˚C -40˚C to +45˚C WARNING: Exceeding maximum operating temperature may result in thermal foldback T (800) 236-6800 T (800) 473-1234 US: creelighting.com Canada: creelighting-canada.com Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IES LM-79-08 standards. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://creelighting.com/products/outdoor/canopy-and-soffit/cpy-series CPY250® LED Canopy/Soffit Luminaire - Version B * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf DROP LENS CESTL Test Report #: PL08412-001A CPY250-B-**-D-B-UL-**-57K Initial Delivered Lumens: 12,403 120˚120˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚60˚ 30˚30˚ 150˚150˚ 1179 3536 4715 Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane throughhorizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 2357 CPY250-B-**-D-B-UL-**-57K Mounting Height: 15' (4.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 12,860 Initial FC at grade .2 .1 CURB LINE .5 1 52 10 0m 18.3 18.3 18.3 0m0' 6.120' 6.120' 60' 24.480' 24.4 12.240' 12.240' 40'60' 20' 12.2 40' 6.1 20'0'60' 24.4 80'80' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. 45˚ 6.112.2 80' 60' 18.324.4 Drop Lens Distribution Lumen Package/ Input Power Designator 3000K 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 A 7,250 B3 U2 G1 7,600 B3 U2 G1 7,720 B3 U2 G1 13L 11,900 B3 U2 G1 12,800 B3 U2 G1 12,825 B3 U2 G1 B 11,850 B3 U2 G1 12,380 B3 U2 G1 12,860 B3 U2 G1 C 4,210 B2 U2 G1 4,420 B2 U2 G1 4,520 B2 U2 G1 E 19,100 B4 U3 G2 19,600 B4 U3 G2 20,080 B4 U3 G2 F 11,850 B3 U2 G1 12,380 B3 U2 G1 12,860 B3 U2 G1 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf FLAT LENS CESTL Test Report #: PL08165-001C CPY250-B-**-F-B-UL-**-57K Initial Delivered Lumens: 13,040 120˚120˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚60˚ 30˚30˚ 150˚150˚ 1181 3542 4723 Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane throughhorizontal angle of maximum candlepower. 2361 CPY250-B-**-F-B-UL-**-57K Mounting Height: 15' (4.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 12,860 Initial FC at grade CURB LINE .1 .2 .5 1 2 5 10 18.3 18.3 18.3 0m0' 6.120' 6.120' 60' 24.480' 24.480' 12.240' 12.240' 60' 40'60' 20' 12.2 40'20'0'60' 24.4 80'80' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. 0m6.112.218.3 6.124.4 45˚ Flat Lens Distribution Lumen Package/ Input Power Designator 3000K 4000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 A 7,250 B3 U0 G1 7,600 B3 U0 G1 7,720 B3 U0 G1 13L 11,900 B3 U0 G1 12,800 B3 U0 G1 12,825 B3 U0 G1 B 11,850 B3 U0 G1 12,380 B3 U0 G1 12,860 B3 U0 G1 C 4,210 B2 U0 G1 4,420 B2 U0 G1 4,520 B2 U0 G1 E 19,100 B4 U0 G1 19,600 B4 U0 G1 20,080 B4 U0 G1 F 11,850 B3 U0 G1 12,380 B3 U0 G1 12,860 B3 U0 G1 T (800) 236-6800 T (800) 473-1234 US: creelighting.com Canada: creelighting-canada.com © 2020 Cree Lighting, A company of IDEAL INDUSTRIES. All rights reserved. For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. Patent www.creelighting.com/patents. Colorfast DeltaGuard® and CPY250® are registered trademarks, and the CPY250 design is a trademark of Cree Lighting, A company of IDEAL INDUSTRIES. Cree® and the Cree logo are registered trademarks of Cree, Inc. The UL logo is a registered trademark of UL LLC. The NSF logo is a registered trademark of NSF International. The DLC QPL logo and the DLC QPL Premium logo are registered trademarks of Efficiency Forward, Inc. CPY250® LED Canopy/Soffit Luminaire - Version B HC Mount 15.0"(382mm) 15.0"(382mm) 4.3"(109mm) 6.0"(153mm) 8.0"(203mm) PD Mount 15.0"(382mm) 15.0"(382mm) Pendant notincluded 8.0"(203mm) 5.9"(149mm) PD Mount w/HZ Option 15.0"(383mm) 15.0"(382mm) 3.0"(75.5mm) 2.0"(50mm) Flat Glass LensThreaded HubSet-Screw 3/4" NPT ConduitSupplied By Others Lumen Package Weight 2L, 4L, 6L 11.0 lbs. (5.0kg) 8L 11.8 lbs. (5.4kg) US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 XSP Series XSPW™ LED Wall Mount Luminaire featuring Cree TrueWhite® Technology Ordering Information Example: XSPW-B-WM-2ME-2L-30K-UL-BK XSPW B WM Product Version Mounting Optic Lumen Package*CCT Voltage Color Options Options XSPW B WM Wall 2ME Type II Medium 3ME Type III Medium 4ME Type IV Medium 2L 2,490 lumens 4L 4,270 lumens 6L 6,100 lumens 8L 8,475 lumens 30K 3000K - 70 CRI 40K 4000K - 70 CRI 50K 5000K - 90 CRI 57K 5700K - 70 CRI UL Universal 120-277V UH Universal 347-480V 34 347V - For use with P option only BK Black BZ Bronze SV Silver WH White ML Multi-Level - Refer to ML spec sheet for details - Available with UL voltage only P Button Photocell - Not available with ML or PML options - Available with UL and 34 voltages only PML Programmable Multi-Level - Refer to PML spec sheet for details - Available with UL voltage only Product Description The XSPW™ LED wall mount luminaire has a slim, low profile design intended for outdoor wall mounted applications. The rugged lightweight aluminum housing and mounting box are designed for installation over standard single gang J-Boxes and mud ring single gang J-Boxes. The luminaire allows for through-wired or conduit entry from the top, bottom, sides and rear. The housing design is intended specifically for LED technology including a weathertight LED driver compartment and thermal management. Optic design features industry-leading NanoOptic® Precision Delivery Grid™ system in multiple distributions. Applications: General area and security lighting NanoOptic® Precision Delivery Grid™ optic Assembled in the U.S.A. of U.S. and imported parts CRI: Minimum 70 CRI (3000K, 4000K & 5700K); 90 CRI (5000K) CCT: 3000K, 4000K, 5000K, 5700K Limited Warranty†: 10 years on luminaire/10 years on Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish Performance Summary 9.3"(236mm) 12"(305mm) 4.8"(122mm)3.8"(97mm) Multi-Level Sensor location(ordered as an option) Accessories † See http://creelighting.com/warranty for warranty terms Field-Installed Beauty Plate WM-PLT12** - 12" (305mm) Square WM-PLT14** - 14" (356mm) Square - Covers holes left by incumbent wall packs Hand-Held Remote XA-SENSREM - For successful implementation of the programmable multi-level option, a minimum of one hand-held remote is required ** Must specify color * Lumen Package selection codes identify approximate light output only. Actual lumen output levels may vary depending on CCT and optic selection. Refer to Initial Delivered Lumen tables for specific lumen values Rev. Date: VersionB V4 02/25/2020 US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 Product Specifications CREE TRUEWHITE® TECHNOLOGY A revolutionary way to generate high-quality white light, Cree TrueWhite® Technology is a patented approach that delivers an exclusive combination of 90+ CRI, beautiful light characteristics and lifelong color consistency, all while maintaining high luminous efficacy – a true no compromise solution. CONSTRUCTION & MATERIALS • Slim, low profile design • Luminaire housing specifically designed for LED applications with advanced LED thermal management and driver • Luminaire mounting box designed for installation over standard single gang J-Boxes and mud ring single gang J-Boxes • Luminaire can also be direct mounted to a wall and surface wired • Secures to wall with four 3/16" (5mm) screws (by others) • Conduit entry from top, bottom, sides, and rear • Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish features an E-coat epoxy primer with an ultra-durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. Silver, black, white and bronze are available • Weight: 2L, 4L, 6L - 11.0 lbs. (5.0kg); 8L - 11.8 lbs. (5.4kg) ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Input Voltage: 120-277V or 347-480V, 50/60Hz • Power Factor: > 0.9 at full load • Total Harmonic Distortion: < 20% at full load • Integral 10kV surge suppression protection standard • When code dictates fusing, a slow blow fuse or type C/D breaker should be used to address inrush current • Designed with 0-10V dimming capabilities. Controls by others • 10V Source Current: 0.15 mA • Refer to Dimming spec sheet for details • Operating Temperature Range: -40˚C - +50˚C (-40˚F - +122˚F) REGULATORY & VOLUNTARY QUALIFICATIONS • cULus Listed • Suitable for wet locations • Designed for downlight applications only • Enclosure rated IP66 per IEC 60598 • ANSI C136.2 10kV surge protection, tested in accordance with IEEE/ANSI C62.41.2 • Meets FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class A limits for conducted and radiated emissions • Luminaire and finish endurance tested to withstand 5,000 hours of elevated ambient salt fog conditions as defined in ASTM Standard B 117 • Meets Buy American requirements within ARRA • RoHS compliant. Consult factory for additional details • Dark Sky Friendly, IDA Approved when ordered with 30K CCT. Please refer to https://www.darksky.org/our-work/lighting/lighting-for- industry/fsa/fsa-products/ for most current information • DLC and DLC Premium qualified versions available. Please refer to https://www.designlights.org/search/ for most current information • CA RESIDENTS WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm – www.p65warnings.ca.gov XSPW™ LED Wall Mount Luminaire XSPW Series Ambient Adjusted Lumen Maintenance Factors1 Ambient Initial LMF 25K hr Reported2 LMF 50K hr Reported2 LMF 75K hr Estimated3 LMF 100K hr Estimated3 LMF 5˚C (41˚F) 1.03 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 10˚C (50˚F) 1.03 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.92 15˚C (59˚F) 1.02 0.97 0.95 0.93 0.92 20˚C (68˚F) 1.01 0.96 0.95 0.93 0.91 25˚C (77˚F) 1.00 0.96 0.94 0.92 0.90 30˚C (86˚F) 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.91 0.89 35˚C (95˚F) 0.98 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.88 40˚C (104˚F) 0.97 0.93 0.91 0.89 0.87 1 Lumen maintenance values at 25˚C (77˚F) are calculated per IES TM-21 based on IES LM-80 report data for the LED package and in-situ luminaire testing. Luminaire ambient temperature factors (LATF) have been applied to all lumen maintenance factors. Please refer to the Temperature Zone Reference Document for outdoor average nighttime ambient conditions. 2 In accordance with IES TM-21, Reported values represent interpolated values based on time durations that are up to 6x the tested duration in the IES LM-80 report for the LED. 3 Estimated values are calculated and represent time durations that exceed the 6x test duration of the LED. * Electrical data at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual wattage may differ by +/- 10% when operating between 120-277V or 347- 480V +/- 10% Electrical Data* Lumen Package CCT/CRI System Watts Efficacy Total Current (A) 120- 480V 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V 2L 30K/70 CRI 20 125 0.17 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 40K/70 CRI 19 131 0.16 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.04 50K/90 CRI 24 104 0.20 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.05 57K/70 CRI 19 131 0.16 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.04 4L 30K/70 CRI 33 129 0.28 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.07 40K/70 CRI 31 138 0.27 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.09 0.07 50K/90 CRI 40 107 0.34 0.20 0.17 0.16 0.12 0.09 57K/70 CRI 31 138 0.26 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.09 0.07 6L 30K/70 CRI 51 120 0.43 0.25 0.22 0.19 0.14 0.11 40K/70 CRI 47 130 0.40 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.14 0.10 50K/90 CRI 60 102 0.51 0.29 0.25 0.23 0.17 0.13 57K/70 CRI 47 130 0.40 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.14 0.10 8L 30K/70 CRI 77 110 0.65 0.38 0.32 0.28 0.22 0.16 40K/70 CRI 72 118 0.61 0.35 0.31 0.27 0.21 0.15 50K/90 CRI 78 89 0.66 0.37 0.33 0.29 0.22 0.16 57K/70 CRI 71 119 0.60 0.35 0.30 0.26 0.20 0.15 US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 XSPW™ LED Wall Mount Luminaire Type II Medium Distribution Lumen Package 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 2L 2,490 B1 U0 G1 2,490 B1 U0 G1 2,490 B1 U0 G1 2,490 B1 U0 G1 4L 4,270 B1 U0 G1 4,270 B1 U0 G1 4,270 B1 U0 G1 4,270 B1 U0 G1 6L 6,100 B1 U0 G2 6,100 B1 U0 G2 6,100 B1 U0 G2 6,100 B1 U0 G2 8L 8,475 B2 U0 G2 8,475 B2 U0 G2 6,925 B1 U0 G2 8,475 B2 U0 G2 Type III Medium Distribution Lumen Package 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 2L 2,490 B1 U0 G1 2,490 B1 U0 G1 2,490 B1 U0 G1 2,490 B1 U0 G1 4L 4,270 B1 U0 G1 4,270 B1 U0 G1 4,270 B1 U0 G1 4,270 B1 U0 G1 6L 6,100 B1 U0 G2 6,100 B1 U0 G2 6,100 B1 U0 G2 6,100 B1 U0 G2 8L 8,475 B2 U0 G2 8,475 B2 U0 G2 6,925 B1 U0 G2 8,475 B2 U0 G2 Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IES LM-79-08 standards. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://creelighting.com/products/outdoor/wall-mount/xsp-series-wall 2ME CESTL Test Report #: PL12798-001A XSPW-B-**-2ME-8L-40K-UL Initial Delivered Lumens: 8,622 1856 5569 7425 3712 150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPW-B-**-2ME-8L-40K-UL Mounting Height: 15' (4.6) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 8,475 Initial FC at grade 20' 20' 20' 20' 40' 40'40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 24.4 0' 0' 40'12.2 18.3 18.360' 60'60' 80' 80'80' 60' Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 67.5˚ 51 .1 .5 2 .2 CURB LINE 3ME CESTL Test Report #: PL12366-007A XSPW-B-**-3ME-8L-40K-UL Initial Delivered Lumens: 8,543 1411 4232 5643 2821 150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPW-B-**-3ME-8L-40K-UL Mounting Height: 15' (4.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 8,475 Initial FC at grade 20' 20' 20' 20' 40' 40'40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 24.4 0' 0' 40'12.2 18.3 18.360' 60'60' 80' 80'80' 60' Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 60˚ .2 51 .1 .5 2 CURB LINE * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 © 2020 Cree Lighting, A company of IDEAL INDUSTRIES. All rights reserved. For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. Patent www.creelighting.com/patents. Cree®, TrueWhite®, Cree TrueWhite® , the Cree TrueWhite Technology logo and the Cree logo are registered trademarks of Cree, Inc. NanoOptic® and Colorfast DeltaGuard® are registered trademarks, and XSPW™ and Precision Delivery Grid™ are trademarks of Cree Lighting, A company of IDEAL INDUSTRIES. The UL logo is a registered trademark of UL LLC. The DLC QPL logo and the DLC QPL Premium logo are registered trademarks of Efficiency Forward, Inc. XSPW™ LED Wall Mount Luminaire Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IES LM-79-08 standards. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://creelighting.com/products/outdoor/wall-mount/xsp-series-wall 4ME RESTL Test Report #: PL14415-001A XSPW-B-**-4ME-8L-40K-UL Initial Delivered Lumens: 8,763 1936 5809 7745 3872 150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPW-B-**-4ME-8L-40K-UL Mounting Height: 15' (4.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 8,475 Initial FC at grade 20' 20' 20' 20' 40' 40'40' 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 24.4 0' 0' 40'12.2 18.3 18.360' 60'60' 80' 80'80' 60' Position of vertical plane of maximum candlepower. 25˚ CURB LINE .1 .2 .5 1 2 5 Type IV Medium Distribution Lumen Package 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 2L 2,490 B1 U0 G1 2,490 B1 U0 G1 2,490 B1 U0 G1 2,490 B1 U0 G1 4L 4,270 B1 U0 G1 4,270 B1 U0 G1 4,270 B1 U0 G1 4,270 B1 U0 G1 6L 6,100 B1 U0 G2 6,100 B1 U0 G2 6,100 B1 U0 G2 6,100 B1 U0 G2 8L 8,475 B1 U0 G2 8,475 B1 U0 G2 6,925 B1 U0 G2 8,475 B1 U0 G2 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf † See http://creelighting.com/warranty for warranty terms US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 Product Description Designed from the ground up as a totally optimized LED street and area lighting system, the XSP Series delivers incredible efficiency without sacrificing application performance. Beyond substantial energy savings and reduced maintenance, Cree Lighting achieves greater optical control with our NanoOptic® Precision Delivery Grid™ optic when compared to traditional cobra head luminaires. The XSP Series is the better alternative for traditional street and area lighting with quick payback and improved performance. Applications: Multi-lane freeways, express ways, major roads, parking lots, and general area spaces Accessories Field-Installed Backlight Control Shield XA-SP2BLS - Provides 1 mounting height cutoff - Polycarbonate construction - Refer to initial delivered lumen tables for lumen output Bird Spikes XSP-BRDGRDL Shorting Cap XA-XSLSHRT NanoOptic® Precision Delivery Grid™ optic Assembled in the U.S.A. of U.S. and imported parts Initial Delivered Lumens: Up to 23,800 Efficacy: Up to 141 LPW CRI: Minimum 70 CRI CCT: 2700K, 3000K, 4000K, 5000K, 5700K Limited Warranty†: 10 years on luminaire/10 years on Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish Performance Summary XSP Series XSPLG LED Street/Area Luminaire – Large 26.2"(665mm) 5.3"(136mm) 14.5"(368mm) NEMA 7-Pin PhotocellReceptacle Location Utility Label Location Weight 23.4 lbs. (10.6kg) Rev. Date: V6 04/14/2020 * Available with Backlight Shield when ordered with field-installed accessory (see table above) ** Lumen Package codes identify approximate light output only. Actual lumen output levels may vary depending on CCT and optic selection. Refer to Initial Delivered Lumen tables for specific lumen values Ordering Information Example: XSPLG-D-HT-2LG-24L-27K7-UL-SV-N XSPLG D HT N Product Version Mounting Optic Lumen Package**CCT/CRI Voltage Color Options Utility Label/ Receptacle Options XSPLG D HT Horizontal Tenon Asymmetric 2LG* Type II Long 2ME* Type II Medium 3ME* Type III Medium 4ME* Type IV Medium 18L 18,000 Lumens 24L 24,000 Lumens 27K7 2700K, 70 CRI 30K7 3000K, 70 CRI 40K7 4000K, 70 CRI 50K7 5000K, 70 CRI 57K7 5700K, 70 CRI UL Universal 120-277V UH Universal 347-480V BK Black BZ Bronze SV Silver WH White N Utility Label and NEMA® 7-Pin Photocell Receptacle -External wattage label per ANSI C136.15 -7-pin receptacle per ANSI C136.41 -Receptacle leads are factory connected to the driver -Requires photocell or shorting cap (by others) DLI DALI Compatible - Available with UL voltage only - Not available with Q or X options G Small Four Bolt Mounting -Mounts to 1.25" (32mm) IP, 1.66" (42mm) O.D. horizontal tenon J Large Four Bolt Mounting -Mounts to 2" (51mm) IP, 2.375" (60mm) O.D. horizontal tenon Q9/Q8/Q7/Q6/Q5/Q4/Q3/Q2/Q1 Field Adjustable Output -Must select Q9, Q8, Q7, Q6, Q5, Q4, Q3, Q2, or Q1 -Offers full range lumen adjustability -Includes wattage label for setting selected -Refer to pages 8 and 9 for power and lumen values -Luminaire may also be dimmed through 7-Pin receptacle with use of dimming control by others X8/X7/X6/X5/X4/X3/X2/X1 Locked Lumen Output -Must select X8, X7, X6, X5, X4, X3, X2, or X1 -Lumen output is permanently locked to the setting selected -Includes wattage label for setting selected -Refer to pages 8 and 9 for power and lumen values -Dimming is only available through 7-Pin receptacle with use of dimming control by others Symmetric 5SH Type V Short US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 Product Specifications CONSTRUCTION & MATERIALS • Die cast aluminum housing • Tool-less entry • Mounts on 1.25" (32mm) IP, 1.66" (42mm) O.D. or 2" (51mm) IP, 2.375" (60mm) O.D. horizontal tenon (minimum 8" [203mm] in length) and is adjustable +/- 5˚ to allow for fixture leveling (includes two axis T-level to aid in leveling) • Luminaire secures with two 410 stainless steel mounting bolts; optional four point mounting available • Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish features an E-Coat epoxy primer with an ultra-durable black, bronze, silver or white powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion • Weight: 23.4 lbs. (10.6kg) ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Input Voltage: 120-277V or 347-480V, 50/60Hz • Power Factor : > 0.9 at full load • Total Harmonic Distortion: < 20% at full load • Integral 10kV surge suppression protection standard • When code dictates fusing, a slow blow fuse or type C/D breaker should be used to address inrush current • Consult factory if in-luminaire fusing is required • Designed with 0-10V dimming capabilities. Controls by others • 10V Source Current: 0.15mA • Luminaires with DLI option are DALI compatible per IEC 62386 • Operating Temperature Range: -40˚C - +40˚C (-40˚F - +104˚F) REGULATORY & VOLUNTARY QUALIFICATIONS • cULus Listed • Suitable for wet locations • Certified to ANSI C136.31-2001, 3G bridge and overpass vibration standards • Meets CALTrans 611 Vibration testing • ANSI C136.2 10kV surge protection, tested in accordance with IEEE/ANSI C62.41.2 • Meets FCC Part 15, Subpart B, Class A limits for conducted and radiated emissions • Luminaire and finish endurance tested to withstand 5,000 hours of elevated ambient salt fog conditions as defined in ASTM Standard B 117 • Meets Buy American requirements within ARRA • RoHS compliant. Consult factory for additional details • Dark Sky Friendly, IDA Approved when ordered with 27K7 or 30K7 CCTs. Please refer to https://www.darksky.org/our-work/lighting/lighting-for- industry/fsa/fsa-products/ for most current information • DLC and DLC Premium qualified versions available. Please refer to https://www.designlights.org/search/ for most current information. • CA RESIDENTS WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm – www.p65warnings.ca.gov XSPLG LED Street/Area Luminaire – Large 1 Lumen maintenance values at 25˚C (77˚F) are calculated per IES TM-21 based on IES LM-80 report data for the LED package and in-situ luminaire testing. Luminaire ambient temperature factors (LATF) have been applied to all lumen maintenance factors. Please refer to the Temperature Zone Reference Document for outdoor average nighttime ambient conditions. 2 In accordance with IES TM-21, Reported values represent interpolated values based on time durations that are up to 6x the tested duration in the IES LM-80 report for the LED. 3 Estimated values are calculated and represent time durations that exceed the 6x test duration of the LED. * Electrical data at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual wattage may differ by +/- 10% when operating between 120-277V or 347-480V +/- 10% Electrical Data* Lumen Package Optics CCT/ CRI System Watts 120-480V Utility Label Wattage Total Current (A) 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V 18L All All 135 140 1.13 0.65 0.57 0.49 0.39 0.28 24L All All 184 180 1.54 0.89 0.77 0.67 0.54 0.39 XSP Series (XSPLG) Ambient Adjusted Lumen Maintenance1 Ambient Optics Initial LMF 25K hr Reported2 LMF 50K hr Reported2 LMF 75K hr Reported2/ Estimated3 LMF 100K hr Reported2/ Estimated3 LMF 5˚C (41˚F) Asymmetric 1.03 1.02 1.00 0.982 0.962 Symmetric 1.04 1.03 1.03 1.033 1.033 10˚C (50˚F) Asymmetric 1.03 1.02 1.00 0.982 0.962 Symmetric 1.03 1.02 1.02 1.023 1.023 15˚C (59˚F) Asymmetric 1.02 1.01 0.99 0.972 0.952 Symmetric 1.02 1.01 1.01 1.013 1.013 20˚C (68˚F) Asymmetric 1.01 1.00 0.98 0.962 0.942 Symmetric 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.003 1.003 25˚C (77˚F) Asymmetric 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.952 0.932 Symmetric 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.993 0.993 Product Specifications SYNAPSE® SIMPLYSNAP INTELLIGENT CONTROL FOR NON-STREET LIGHTING APPLICATIONS ONLY The XSP Series is compatible with the Synapse® SimplySNAP platform. A highly intuitive connected lighting solution for Site and Area applications only. The system features a reliable and robust self- healing mesh network with a browser-based interface that runs on smartphones, tablets, and PCs. Using a Twist-Lock Lighting Controller and Site Controller, SimplySnap provides: energy productivity, code compliance and a better light experience for non-street lighting installations. SimplySNAP is optimized to create and manage networks for campus wide Area and Site applications which differs from networking requirements for street lighting applications. Synapse Wireless Control Accessories (for Non-Street Lighting Applications only) Twist-Lock Lighting Controller TL7-B2 - Suitable for 120-277V (UL) voltage only - Requires NEMA/ANSI C136.41 7-Pin Dimming Receptacle - Not for use with Q options - Provides On/Off switching, dimming, power metering, digital sensor input, and status monitoring of luminaires - Refer to TL7-B2 spec sheet for details SimplySNAP Central Base Station CBSSW-450-002 - Includes On-Site Controller (SS450-002) and 5-button switch - Indoor and Outdoor rated - Refer to CBSSW-450-002 spec sheet for details Synapse Wireless Sensor WSN-DPM - Motion and light sensor - Control multiple zones - Refer to WSN-DPM spec sheet for details SimplySNAP On-Site Controller SS450-002 - Verizon® LTE-enabled - Designed for indoor applications - Refer to SS450-002 spec sheet for details Building Management System (BMS) Gateway BMS-GW-002 - Required for BACnet integration - Refer to BMS-GW-002 spec sheet for details Outdoor Antennas (Optional, for increased range, 8dB gain) KIT-ANT420SM - Kit includes antenna, 20' cable and bracket KIT-ANT360 - Kit includes antenna, 30' cable and bracket KIT-ANT600 - Kit includes antenna, 50' cable and bracket - Refer to Outdoor antenna spec sheet for details US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IES LM-79-08 standards. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://creelighting.com/products/outdoor/street-and-roadway/xsp-series XSPLG LED Street/Area Luminaire – Large RESTL Test Report #: PL12765-008B XSPLG-D-**-2LG-24L-40K7-UL-**-N w/XA-SP2BLS Initial Delivered Lumens: 17,373 6531 13062 19592 26123150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPLG-D-**-2LG-24L-40K7-UL-**-N w/XA-SP2BLS Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 17,500 Initial FC at grade 80'80' 20' 20' 40' 0m 6.1 6.1 12.2 12.2 40'40'60'60'20' 20'0' 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 0' 40' 30.5 30.5 36.636.642.7 42.7 100'100'120'120'140'140' 18.3 18.3 60' 24.4 24.4 80' 80' 60' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. CURB LINE .5 82.5˚ .2.1 2 2LG RESTL Test Report #: PL12765-007B XSPLG-D-**-2LG-24L-40K7-UL-**-N Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,437 6821 13643 20464 27285150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPLG-D-**-2LG-24L-40K7-UL-**-N Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,600 Initial FC at grade 80'80' 20' 20' 40' 0m 6.1 6.1 12.2 12.2 40'40'60'60'20' 20'0' 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 0' 40' 30.5 30.5 36.636.642.7 42.7 100'100'120'120'140'140' 18.3 18.3 60' 24.4 24.4 80' 80' 60' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. CURB LINE .5 82.5˚ .2.1 2 Type II Long Distribution Lumen Package 2700K 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 18L 17,500 B3 U0 G3 18,100 B3 U0 G3 18,700 B3 U0 G3 18,800 B3 U0 G3 18,800 B3 U0 G3 24L 22,300 B4 U0 G3 23,000 B4 U0 G3 23,600 B4 U0 G3 23,800 B4 U0 G3 23,800 B4 U0 G3 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf Type II Long w/BLS Distribution Lumen Package 2700K 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 18L 12,950 B2 U0 G2 13,400 B2 U0 G2 13,850 B2 U0 G2 13,900 B2 U0 G2 13,900 B2 U0 G2 24L 16,500 B3 U0 G2 17,000 B3 U0 G3 17,500 B3 U0 G3 17,600 B3 U0 G3 17,600 B3 U0 G3 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf 2LG US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 XSPLG LED Street/Area Luminaire – Large Type II Medium Distribution Lumen Package 2700K 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 18L 17,500 B3 U0 G3 18,100 B3 U0 G3 18,700 B3 U0 G3 18,800 B3 U0 G3 18,800 B3 U0 G3 24L 22,300 B3 U0 G3 23,000 B3 U0 G3 23,600 B3 U0 G3 23,800 B3 U0 G3 23,800 B3 U0 G3 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf RESTL Test Report #: PL12765-004B XSPLG-D-**-2ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N w/XA-SP2BLS Initial Delivered Lumens: 17,757 4146 8293 12439 16586150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPLG-D-**-2ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N w/XA-SP2BLS Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 18,200 Initial FC at grade 80'80' 20' 20' 40' 0m 6.1 6.1 12.2 12.2 40'40'60'60'20' 20'0' 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 0' 40' 30.5 30.5 36.636.642.7 42.7 100'100'120'120'140'140' 18.3 18.3 60' 24.4 24.4 80' 80' 60' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. CURB LINE 70˚ 2 .1 .2 .5 Type II Medium w/BLS Distribution Lumen Package 2700K 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 18L 13,475 B1 U0 G2 13,925 B1 U0 G2 14,400 B1 U0 G2 14,475 B1 U0 G2 14,475 B1 U0 G2 24L 17,200 B2 U0 G3 17,700 B2 U0 G3 18,200 B2 U0 G3 18,300 B2 U0 G3 18,300 B2 U0 G3 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf 2ME RESTL Test Report #: PL12765-003B XSPLG-D-**-2ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,168 5230 10461 15691 20922150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPLG-D-**-2ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,600 Initial FC at grade 80'80' 20' 20' 40' 0m 6.1 6.1 12.2 12.2 40'40'60'60'20' 20'0' 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 0' 40' 30.5 30.5 36.636.642.7 42.7 100'100'120'120'140'140' 18.3 18.3 60' 24.4 24.4 80' 80' 60' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. CURB LINE 70˚ 2 .1 .2 .5 Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IES LM-79-08 standards. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://creelighting.com/products/outdoor/street-and-roadway/xsp-series US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IES LM-79-08 standards. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://creelighting.com/products/outdoor/street-and-roadway/xsp-series XSPLG LED Street/Area Luminaire – Large 3ME RESTL Test Report #: PL12765-001B XSPLG-D-**-3ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,083 3861 7722 11583 15445150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPLG-D-**-3ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,600 Initial FC at grade 80'80' 20' 20' 40' 0m 6.1 6.1 12.2 12.2 40'40'60'60'20' 20'0' 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 0' 40' 30.5 30.5 36.636.6 100'100'120'120' 18.3 18.3 60' 24.480' 60' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. CURB LINE .5 62.5˚ 2 100'30.5 .1 .2 RESTL Test Report #: PL12765-002B XSPLG-D-**-3ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N w/XA-SP2BLS Initial Delivered Lumens: 16,503 3284 6569 9853 13138150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPLG-D-**-3ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N w/XA-SP2BLS Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 16,800 Initial FC at grade 80'80' 20' 20' 40' 0m 6.1 6.1 12.2 12.2 40'40'60'60'20' 20'0' 12.218.3 6.1 0m 6.1 12.2 18.324.4 24.4 0' 40' 30.5 30.5 36.636.6 100'100'120'120' 18.3 18.3 60' 24.480' 60' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. CURB LINE .5 62.5˚ 2 100'30.5 .1 .2 Type III Medium Distribution Lumen Package 2700K 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 18L 17,500 B3 U0 G3 18,100 B3 U0 G3 18,700 B3 U0 G3 18,800 B3 U0 G3 18,800 B3 U0 G3 24L 22,300 B3 U0 G3 23,000 B3 U0 G3 23,600 B3 U0 G4 23,800 B3 U0 G4 23,800 B3 U0 G4 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf Type III Medium w/BLS Distribution Lumen Package 2700K 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 18L 12,425 B2 U0 G2 12,850 B2 U0 G2 13,275 B2 U0 G2 13,350 B2 U0 G2 13,350 B2 U0 G2 24L 15,800 B2 U0 G3 16,300 B2 U0 G3 16,800 B2 U0 G3 16,900 B2 U0 G3 16,900 B2 U0 G3 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 4ME RESTL Test Report #: PL12765-005B XSPLG-D-**-4ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,195 3230 6460 9690 12919150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPLG-D-**-4ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,600 Initial FC at grade 0m6.1 18.312.2 30.5 18.3 18.3 24.4 24.4 0m0' 6.120' 6.120' 60' 80' 100' 12.240' 12.240' 60' 40' 18.3 60' 20' 12.2 40' 6.1 20'0'60' 24.4 80' 24.4 80' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. 80' 30.5 30.5 100'100' .1 .2 2 .5 45˚ 120'36.6 CURB LINE RESTL Test Report #: PL12765-006B XSPLG-D-**-4ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N w/XA-SP2BLS Initial Delivered Lumens: 16,941 3230 6460 9690 12919150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPLG-D-**-4ME-24L-40K7-UL-**-N w/XA-SP2BLS Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 17,200 Initial FC at grade 0m6.1 18.312.2 30.5 18.3 18.3 24.4 24.4 0m0' 6.120' 6.120' 60' 80' 100' 12.240' 12.240' 60' 40' 18.3 60' 20' 12.2 40' 6.1 20'0'60' 24.4 80' 24.4 80' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. 80' 30.5 30.5 100'100' .1 .2 2.5 45˚ 120'36.6 CURB LINE Type IV Medium Distribution Lumen Package 2700K 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 18L 17,500 B3 U0 G3 18,100 B3 U0 G3 18,700 B3 U0 G3 18,800 B3 U0 G3 18,800 B3 U0 G3 24L 22,300 B3 U0 G3 23,000 B3 U0 G3 23,600 B3 U0 G3 23,800 B4 U0 G3 23,800 B4 U0 G3 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf Type IV Medium w/BLS Distribution Lumen Package 2700K 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 18L 12,775 B2 U0 G2 13,225 B2 U0 G2 13,650 B2 U0 G2 13,725 B2 U0 G2 13,725 B2 U0 G2 24L 16,300 B2 U0 G2 16,800 B2 U0 G2 17,200 B2 U0 G3 17,400 B2 U0 G3 17,400 B2 U0 G3 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IES LM-79-08 standards. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://creelighting.com/products/outdoor/street-and-roadway/xsp-series XSPLG LED Street/Area Luminaire – Large US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 XSPLG LED Street/Area Luminaire – Large Luminaire EPA Horizontal Tenon Mount – Weight: 23.4 lbs. (10.6kg) Single 2 @ 90˚2 @ 180˚3 @ 90˚4 @ 90˚ Tenon Configuration If used with Cree Lighting tenons, please add tenon EPA with luminaire EPA PD-1H4; PT-1H PD-2H4(90); PT-2H(90)PD-2H4(180); PT-2H(180)PD-3H4(90); PT-3H(90)PD-4H4(90); PT-4H(90) 0.69 1.14 1.38 1.83 2.28 Tenons and Brackets‡ (must specify color) Square Internal Mount Horizontal Tenons (Aluminum) - Mounts to 4" (102mm) square aluminum or steel poles PD-1H4 – Single PD-3H4(90) – 90˚ Triple PD-2H4(90) – 90˚ Twin PD-4H4(90) – 90˚ Quad PD-2H4(180) – 180˚ Twin Wall Mount Brackets - Mounts to wall or roof WM-2L – Extended Horizontal Round External Mount Horizontal Tenons (Aluminum) - Mounts to 2.375"-3" (60-76mm) O.D. round aluminum or steel poles or tenons - Mounts to 3" (76mm), 4" (102mm), 5" (127mm), or 6" (152mm) square pole with PB-1A* tenon PT-1H – Single PT-3H(90) – 90˚ Triple PT-2H(90) – 90˚ Twin PT-4H(90) – 90˚ Quad PT-2H(180) – 180˚ Twin Direct Arm Pole Adaptor Bracket - Mounts to 3-6" (76-152mm) round or square aluminum or steel poles XA-TMDA8 Tenon EPA Part Number EPA PD Series Tenons 0.09 PT Series Tenons 0.10 WM-2L 0.13 XA-TMDA8 0.19 ‡ Refer to the Bracket and Tenons spec sheet for more details * Specify pole size: 3 (3"), 4 (4"), 5 (5"), or 6 (6") for single, double or triple luminaire orientation or 4 (4"), 5 (5") or 6 (6") for quad luminaire orientation RESTL Test Report #: PL14063-001A XSPLG-D-**-5SH-24L-30K7-UL-**-N Initial Delivered Lumens: 21,359 2228 4455 6683 8911150˚ 120˚120˚ 60˚ 90˚90˚ 60˚ 30˚ 150˚ Candlepower Trace: Vertical plane through horizontal angle of maximum candlepower. XSPLG-D-**-5SH-24L-30K7-UL-**-N Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 21,700 Initial FC at grade 0m6.1 18.312.2 30.5 30.5 36.6 36.6 36.6 18.3 18.3 24.4 24.4 0m0' 6.120' 6.120' 60' 80' 100' 100' 12.240' 12.240' 60' 40' 18.3 60' 20' 12.2 40' 6.1 20'0'60' 24.4 80' 24.4 80' Position of vertical planeof maximum candlepower. 80' 30.5 30.5 100'100'120'120' 45˚ 120' 120' 36.6 CURB LINE .1 .2 .5 2 * Initial delivered lumens at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf Type V Short Distribution Lumen Package 2700K 3000K 4000K 5000K 5700K Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 Initial Delivered Lumens* BUG Ratings** Per TM-15-11 18L 14,925 B4 U0 G3 18,100 B4 U0 G3 19,000 B5-U0-G3 19,000 B5 U0 G3 19,000 B5 U0 G3 24L 17,900 B4 U0 G3 21,700 B5 U0 G3 22,800 B5-U0-G3 22,800 B5 U0 G3 22,800 B5 U0 G3 5SH Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IES LM-79-08 standards. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://creelighting.com/products/outdoor/street-and-roadway/xsp-series US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 XSPLG LED Street/Area Luminaire – Large Field Adjustable Output (Q9/Q8/Q7/Q6/Q5/Q4/Q3/Q2/Q1) Option Description: The Field Adjustable Output option enables the street and area luminaire within the XSP Series on this page to be tuned to the exact needs of a particular application through multiple levels of adjustment. When ordered with the Q option, the luminaire will be shipped from the factory at the selected lumen output, will be fully adjustable between the outputs, and will include a wattage label that indicates the wattage of the luminaire at the selected lumen output (Rounded to nearest 10 watts per ANSI C136.15-2015.). Additional dimming functionality is available when a dimming control (by others) is used in the 7-Pin receptacle. Locked Lumen Output (X8/X7/X6/X5/X4/X3/X2/X1) Option Description: The Locked Lumen Output option on this page permanently locks the lumen output on the XSP Series street and area luminaire to the setting selected. When ordered with the X option, the luminaire will be shipped from the factory at the lumen output setting selected, and will include a wattage label that indicates the wattage of the setting selected. When this option is selected, the luminaire output is not able to be adjusted in the field except if a dimming control (by others) is used in the 7-Pin receptacle. † Electrical and lumen data at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual wattage and lumen output may differ by +/-10% when operating between 120-277V or 347-480V +/-10% Q & X Option Power & Lumen Data – 18L Q Option Setting X Option Setting CCT/ CRI System Watts† Label Wattage Lumen Values†Optics Qualified on DLC QPL 120-480V 2LG/2ME/ 3ME/4ME 5SH 2LG w/ BLS 2ME w/ BLS 3ME w/BLS 4ME w/BLS Standard Premium Q9 N/A (Full Power) 27K7 135 140 17,500 14,925 12,950 13,475 12,425 12,775 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 18,100 18,100 13,400 13,925 12,850 13,225 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 18,700 19,000 13,850 14,400 13,275 13,650 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 18,800 19,000 13,900 14,475 13,350 13,725 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 18,800 19,000 13,900 14,475 13,350 13,725 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q8 X8 27K7 128 130 16,700 14,475 12,350 12,850 11,850 12,200 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 17,300 17,500 12,800 13,325 12,275 12,625 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 17,900 18,700 13,250 13,775 12,700 13,075 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 18,000 18,200 13,325 13,850 12,775 13,150 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 18,000 18,200 13,325 13,850 12,775 13,150 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q7 X7 27K7 121 120 16,000 13,875 11,850 12,325 11,350 11,675 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 16,500 16,800 12,200 12,700 11,725 12,050 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 17,100 17,900 12,650 13,175 12,150 12,475 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 17,200 17,500 12,725 13,250 12,200 12,550 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 17,200 17,500 12,725 13,250 12,200 12,550 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q6 X6 27K7 115 120 15,400 13,450 11,400 11,850 10,925 11,250 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 30K7 15,900 16,300 11,775 12,250 11,300 11,600 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 16,500 17,400 12,200 12,700 11,725 12,050 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 16,600 17,000 12,275 12,775 11,775 12,125 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 16,600 17,000 12,275 12,775 11,775 12,125 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q5 X5 27K7 105 110 14,275 12,400 10,575 11,000 10,125 10,425 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 30K7 14,750 14,975 10,925 11,350 10,475 10,775 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 15,300 16,000 11,325 11,775 10,875 11,175 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 15,400 15,600 11,400 11,850 10,925 11,250 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 15,400 15,600 11,400 11,850 10,925 11,250 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q4 X4 27K7 95 100 13,025 11,625 9,650 10,025 9,250 9,500 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 30K7 13,475 14,075 9,975 10,375 9,575 9,825 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 13,975 15,000 10,350 10,750 9,925 10,200 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 14,025 14,700 10,375 10,800 9,950 10,250 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 14,025 14,700 10,375 10,800 9,950 10,250 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q3 X3 27K7 85 90 11,875 10,550 8,800 9,150 8,425 8,675 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 30K7 12,275 12,750 9,075 9,450 8,725 8,950 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 12,725 13,600 9,425 9,800 9,025 9,300 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 12,775 13,300 9,450 9,825 9,075 9,325 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 12,775 13,300 9,450 9,825 9,075 9,325 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q2 X2 27K7 76 80 10,725 9,575 7,925 8,250 7,625 7,825 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 30K7 11,075 11,575 8,200 8,525 7,875 8,075 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 11,475 12,350 8,500 8,825 8,150 8,375 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 11,525 12,100 8,525 8,875 8,175 8,425 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 11,525 12,100 8,525 8,875 8,175 8,425 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q1 X1 27K7 67 70 9,525 8,750 7,050 7,325 6,775 6,950 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 30K7 9,850 10,575 7,300 7,575 7,000 7,200 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 10,200 11,275 7,550 7,850 7,250 7,450 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 10,250 11,000 7,575 7,900 7,275 7,475 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 10,250 11,000 7,575 7,900 7,275 7,475 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH US: creelighting.com (800) 236-6800 Canada: creelighting-canada.com (800) 473-1234 © 2020 Cree Lighting, A company of IDEAL INDUSTRIES. All rights reserved. For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. Patent www.creelighting.com/patents. Cree® and the Cree logo are registered trademarks of Cree, Inc. NanoOptic® and Colorfast DeltaGuard® are registered trademarks, and Precision Delivery Grid™ is a trademark of Cree Lighting, A company of IDEAL INDUSTRIES. The UL logo is a registered trademark of UL LLC. NEMA® is a registered trademark of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. The DLC QPL logo and the DLC QPL Premium logo are registered trademarks of Efficiency Forward, Inc. Synapse® is a registered trademark of Synapse Wireless, Inc. Verizon® is a registered trademark of Verizon Trademark Services LLC. XSPLG LED Street/Area Luminaire – Large Field Adjustable Output (Q9/Q8/Q7/Q6/Q5/Q4/Q3/Q2/Q1) Option Description: The Field Adjustable Output option enables the street and area luminaire within the XSP Series on this page to be tuned to the exact needs of a particular application through multiple levels of adjustment. When ordered with the Q option, the luminaire will be shipped from the factory at the selected lumen output, will be fully adjustable between the outputs, and will include a wattage label that indicates the wattage of the luminaire at the selected lumen output (Rounded to nearest 10 watts per ANSI C136.15-2015.). Additional dimming functionality is available when a dimming control (by others) is used in the 7-Pin receptacle. Locked Lumen Output (X8/X7/X6/X5/X4/X3/X2/X1) Option Description: The Locked Lumen Output option on this page permanently locks the lumen output on the XSP Series street and area luminaire to the setting selected. When ordered with the X option, the luminaire will be shipped from the factory at the lumen output setting selected, and will include a wattage label that indicates the wattage of the setting selected. When this option is selected, the luminaire output is not able to be adjusted in the field except if a dimming control (by others) is used in the 7-Pin receptacle. † Electrical and lumen data at 25˚C (77˚F). Actual wattage and lumen output may differ by +/-10% when operating between 120-277V or 347-480V +/-10% Q & X Option Power & Lumen Data – 24L Q Option Setting X Option Setting CCT/ CRI System Watts† Label Wattage Lumen Values†Optics Qualified on DLC QPL 120-480V 2LG/2ME/ 3ME/4ME 5SH 2LG w/ BLS 2ME w/ BLS 3ME w/ BLS 4ME w/BLS Standard Premium Q9 N/A (Full Power) 27K7 184 180 22,300 17,900 16,500 17,200 15,800 16,300 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 23,000 21,700 17,000 17,700 16,300 16,800 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 23,600 22,800 17,500 18,200 16,800 17,200 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 23,800 22,800 17,600 18,300 16,900 17,400 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 23,800 22,800 17,600 18,300 16,900 17,400 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q8 X8 27K7 174 170 21,600 17,400 16,000 16,600 15,300 15,800 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 22,300 21,000 16,500 17,200 15,800 16,300 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 22,900 22,400 16,900 17,600 16,300 16,700 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 23,000 21,900 17,000 17,700 16,300 16,800 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 23,000 21,900 17,000 17,700 16,300 16,800 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q7 X7 27K7 164 160 20,700 16,700 15,300 15,900 14,700 15,100 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 21,300 20,100 15,800 16,400 15,100 15,500 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 21,900 21,500 16,200 16,900 15,500 16,000 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 22,100 21,000 16,400 17,000 15,700 16,100 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 22,100 21,000 16,400 17,000 15,700 16,100 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q6 X6 27K7 156 160 20,100 16,200 14,875 15,500 14,275 14,675 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 20,700 19,500 15,300 15,900 14,700 15,100 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 21,300 20,800 15,800 16,400 15,100 15,500 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 21,400 20,400 15,800 16,500 15,200 15,600 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 21,400 20,400 15,800 16,500 15,200 15,600 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q5 X5 27K7 143 140 18,500 14,875 13,700 14,250 13,125 13,500 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 19,000 18,000 14,050 14,625 13,500 13,875 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 19,600 19,200 14,500 15,100 13,925 14,300 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 19,700 18,700 14,575 15,200 13,975 14,375 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 19,700 18,700 14,575 15,200 13,975 14,375 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q4 X4 27K7 128 130 17,400 13,975 12,875 13,400 12,350 12,700 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 17,800 16,900 13,175 13,700 12,650 13,000 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 18,400 18,000 13,625 14,175 13,075 13,425 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 18,500 17,600 13,700 14,250 13,125 13,500 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 18,500 17,600 13,700 14,250 13,125 13,500 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q3 X3 27K7 116 120 15,800 12,650 11,700 12,175 11,225 11,525 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 16,200 15,300 12,000 12,475 11,500 11,825 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 16,700 16,300 12,350 12,850 11,850 12,200 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 16,800 15,900 12,425 12,925 11,925 12,275 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 16,800 15,900 12,425 12,925 11,925 12,275 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q2 X2 27K7 103 100 14,325 11,500 10,600 11,025 10,175 10,450 5SH 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME 30K7 14,725 13,900 10,900 11,350 10,450 10,750 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 15,100 14,825 11,175 11,625 10,725 11,025 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 15,300 14,500 11,325 11,775 10,875 11,175 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 15,300 14,500 11,325 11,775 10,875 11,175 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Q1 X1 27K7 91 90 13,075 10,500 9,675 10,075 9,275 9,550 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 30K7 13,450 12,675 9,950 10,350 9,550 9,825 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 40K7 13,825 13,525 10,225 10,650 9,825 10,100 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 50K7 13,925 13,200 10,300 10,725 9,875 10,175 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH 57K7 13,925 13,200 10,300 10,725 9,875 10,175 2LG, 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH Jo b # : Sc a l e : Da t e : Dr a w n B y : Ch e c k e d B y : Re v . # Da t e D e s c r i p t i o n 02 / 1 0 / 2 0 2 1 1/ 4 " - 1 ' - 0 " Do c u m e n t s p r e p a r e d b y C o r e St a t e s G r o u p a r e t o b e u s e d o n l y fo r t h e s p e c i f i c p r o j e c t a n d s p e c i f i c us e f o r w h i c h t h e y a r e i n t e n d e d . An y e x t e n s i o n o f u s e t o o t h e r pr o j e c t s , b y o w n e r o r a n y o t h e r pa r t y , w i t h o u t t h e e x p r e s s e d , wr i t t e n c o n s e n t o f C o r e S t a t e s Gr o u p i s d o n e a t t h e u s e r ' s o w n r i s k . If u s e d i n a w a y o t h e r t h a n t h a t sp e c i f i c a l l y i n t e n d e d , u s e r w i l l h o l d Co r e S t a t e s G r o u p h a r m l e s s f r o m a l l cl a i m s a n d l o s s e s . LAYOUT # A0.03 SE C U R I T Y P L A N I. H E R N A N D E Z T. S E R N A NOTE NO OTHER CAMERAS PLACED ON SITE. ALL SECURITY CAMERAS WILL BE LOCATED ON OR WITHIN THE BUILDING AS SHOWN SE I . 2 7 0 4 9 7- 1 1 # 1 0 4 3 1 4 6 NE C B A L L & S U N K I S T AN A H E I M , C A 9 2 8 0 6 7- E L E V E N , I N C . 32 0 0 H A C K B E R R Y R O A D , I R V I N G , T E X A S 7 5 0 6 3 SECURITY PLAN LEGEND N PROTO 2019.01: 02.28 12 7 0 0 H i l l c r e s t R o a d Su i t e 1 9 2 Da l l a s , T X 7 5 2 3 0 21 4 . 3 7 7 . 5 0 6 0 co r e - s t a t e s . c o m GR O U P CO R E S T A T E S , I N C . 4' C A N D Y R A C K 2' C A N D Y R A C K 4' C A N D Y R A C K SALES POS POS BEVERAGE WALL BUN DRAWERWASTE CONDIMENT ISLAND NOVELTY F E M - C H I P S MERCHANDISE UNISEX NEWS ATM FLOOR SPINNER: SUNGLASSES GLOVES UMBRELLAS CI G ' S C I G ' S I T P O T P OFFICE ELECTRICAL BACKROOM CO2 N2 N2 ICE COOLER VAULT LOW TEMP 15'- 0 " SECURITY CAMERA EXTERIOR SECURITY CAMERA EXTERIOR SECURITY CAMERA SECURITY MONITOR SECURITY MONITOR W/ SEPARATE CAMERA SECURITY CAMERA EXTERIOR SECURITY CAMERA SECURITY CAMERA SECURITY CAMERA EXTERIOR SECURITY CAMERA ATTACHMENT NO. 9 Release 03/2013 Product Specification Sheet Clickit Part Number 3100‐03‐UL10 Product Description H.264 Indoor Mini Dome IP Camera POE splitter included Image Sensor 1/4" VGA CMOS Effective Pixels 640 x 480 Scanning System Progressive Scan Horizontal Resolution n/a550 TVL Minimum Illumination 3 Lux (Color), 0.1 Lux (DSS On) Lens Wide Angle lens 2.1 mm Day & Night S/W Audio Input/output 1 Channel each Audio Compression Format G.711 Power Source 12V DC (DC Jack) Power Consumption (Approx.) 360 mA @ +12V Operating Temperature 0° C ~ 50° C (32° F ~ 122° F) Humidity Range Operating Up to 85% RH (Non-condensing) Dimension Housing - 124 (Φ) x 101.5 (H) mm Dome - 100 (Φ) mm Country of Origin Korea ECCN: 6A003 HTS 8525.80.30 Shipping Weight 5 lbs. Approved FCC, CE, UL ( US and Canadian ) Standard Lead Time 7-10 Business days Product Specification Sheet ClickIt Part Number 4205-WH-DM360 Product Description: 360 IP Indoor Mini Dome Product Description H.264 360° FOV Indoor Mini IP Camera Image Sensor 5 megapixel; Array Format (Active); 1/2.5-inch CMOS Sensor Field of View 360° Angle of View 180° hemisphere Resolution 4MP (2144x1944), 2MP (1488x1360), 1MP (1056x960) 1/4MP(528x480) Frame Rate 10FPS @ 4MP; 15FPS @ 2MP; 15FPS @ 1MP Minimum Illumination 0.02 lux Lens 185° 1.6mm / F2.0 Cabling Cat-5 or better Networking TCP/IP, HTTP, DHCP, DNS, NTP, FTP, SMTP, RSTP, uPNP Storage Built-in Micro SD card slot Power Source POE 802.3af Power Consumption (Approx) 4.032W max Operating Temperature 0 to +40°C (-32 to +104°F) Humidity Range Operating Up to 98% Dimension 108(ø) mm (4.25”) X 55(H) mm (2.17”) Country of Origin United Kingdom ECCN: 6A003 HTS 8525.80.30 Shipping Weight 3 lbs Approved FCC, CE, UL ( US and Canadian ) Product Specification Sheet Clickit Part Number 7705-S08-2-711 Description: HVR, Desktop, 8 Ch. Analog, 2 Ch. IP, 2TB storage, SSD, POS cable Included Product Description SmartCamXi HVR Licensed Analog Channels 8 Licensed IP Channels 2 Compression Format MPEG-4/MJPEG POS Interface Up to 4 registers - 1 DB-25 interface (card end), 4 DB-9 interfaces (register connection) Camera Support Analog and Clickit IP 360 and Clickit IP analytic camera Form Factor Desktop Chassis Processor Intel Motherboard Intel OS Drive Type SSD Storage Space 2 TB Swappable Data Drives No OS ClickIt SmartCamXi Server running Windows 7E Power In Win Power Supply LAN/WAN Connectivity Dual NIC Keyboard and Mouse Yes CD/DVD Writer Yes Country of Origin USA ECCN: 4A994 HTS 8521.90.0000 Shipping Weight 25 Rated FCC, CSA, CE www.americandynamics.net Public View Monitors Professional Series 22˝ W, 26˝ W and 32˝ W displays Features That Make a Difference: • High quality with leading technology • LED backlighting with low power consumption • Supports up to 1920 x 1080 (FHD) resolution • Attractive slim chassis design for retail spaces or other public viewing applications • Built-in camera with motion sensing technology • Camera varifocal lens for easy field of view adjustments • Camera motion triggered actions include: - Activate physical alarm output - Present message (“Recording” or “Welcome”) with flashing or static text - Turn on flashing LED to draw attention to monitor • Auto-shift option to prevent pixel burn-in • Built-in stereo audio speakers • HDMI, DVI and VGA inputs for digital signage applications • 1x CVBS looping, 1x CVBS internal camera output and 1x S-Video input • Support for DC24V input voltage • DC12V output jack available for supplying power to external camera • Monitors include remote control and 24V DC power adapter American Dynamics 22˝, 26˝ and 32˝ Professional Series Public View Monitors (PVM), with integrated color camera, offer an attractive ultra slim chassis design well suited for retail spaces or other public viewing applications. These PVMs are available in both black and white chassis color options to best match retail interiors. Without being obtrusive, the integrated camera points in the direction of oncoming store traffic monitoring every move support of retail loss prevention efforts. These full HD 1080p monitors provide sharp images using either an an integrated PIXIM Seawolf WDR or Sony 1.3 megapixel camera. These cameras include a vari-focal lens to help display the best field of view. The PIXIM Seawolf WDR camera uses a pixel-based imager that adjusts for lighting conditions by pixel. This ensures the best image under difficult lighting conditions such as installation in brightly lit entrances. The Sony 1.3 megapixel camera provides higher resolution of video images (1.3 megapixels) than any analog CCTV providing rich detail of oncoming traffic. In addition, the monitors use edge-lit LED backlighting for added power savings and substantial cost benefits. Unit: mm/in Model A B C D E ADLCD22PPxxxx 511.80/20.15 357.70/14.08 16.50/0.65 80.00/3.15 20.00/0.79 ADLCD26PPxxxx 627.60/24.71 428.05/16.85 24.88/0.98 83.4/3.28 23.4/0.92 ADLCD32PPxxxx 743.6/29.28 494.5/19.47 21.05/0.83 96.4/3.80 36.4/1.43 (1) Monitor includes integrated PIXIM Seawolf WDR camera (2) Monitor includes integrated Sony 1.3MP CMOS camera (A) (C) (D) (E) (B) ADLCD26PPS0B/W1 ADLCD26PPXS0B/W2 ADLCD22PPS0B/W1 ADLCD22PPXS0B/W2 ADLCD32PPS0B/W1 ADLCD32PPXS0B/W2 www.americandynamics.net The trademarks, logos, and service marks displayed on this document are registered in the United States [or other countries]. Any misuse of the trademarks is strictly prohibited and Tyco International Ltd. will aggressively enforce its intellectual property rights to the fullest extent of the law, including pursuit of criminal prosecution wherever necessary. All trademarks not owned by Tyco International Ltd. are the property of their respective owners, and are used with permission or allowed under applicable laws. Product offerings and specifications are subject to change without notice. Actual products may vary from photos. Not all products include all features. Availability varies by region; contact your sales representative. © 2012 Tyco International Ltd. and its respective companies. All rights reserved. AD0269-DS-201208-R01-LT-EN Related Products HDVRADTVR Series VideoEdgeIllustra Cameras Ordering Information Model Numbers Description Monitors ADLCD22PPS0B/W 22˝ W PVM LCD 1920 x 1080 FHD LED, camera (VF2.8~10mm, 1/3˝ PIXIM), IR RC, black/white ADLCD22PPXS0B/W 22˝ W PVM LCD 1920 x 1080 FHD LED, 1.3MP camera (VF3.0~10mm, 1/3˝ Sony), IR RC, black/white ADLCD26PPS0B/W 26˝ W PVM LCD 1920 x 1080 FHD LED, camera (VF2.8~10mm, 1/3˝ PIXIM), IR RC, black/white ADLCD26PPXS0B/W 26˝ W PVM LCD 1920 x 1080 FHD LED, 1.3MP camera (VF3.0~10mm, 1/3˝ Sony), IR RC, black/white ADLCD32PPS0B/W 32˝ W PVM LCD 1920 x 1080 FHD LED, camera (VF2.8~10mm, 1/3˝ PIXIM), IR RC, black/white ADLCD32PPXS0B/W 32˝ W PVM LCD 1920 x 1080 FHD LED, 1.3MP camera (VF3.0~10mm, 1/3˝ Sony), IR RC, black/white Optional Accessories ADMMTLCDWL (supports ADLCD22PPxxxx)Dual pivoting wall mount with lanyard, black ADMNMTLCDWAL (supports ADLCD22PPxxxx & ADLCD26PPxxxx)Articulating arm wall mount with lanyard, black ADMMTLCDPL (supports ADLCD22PPxxxx, ADLCD26PPxxxx & ADLCD32PPxxxx)Ceiling mount with lanyard, black (1.5˝ NPT pole required) ADMMTLCDPWL (supports ADLCD22PPxxxx, ADLCD26PPxxxx & ADLCD32PPxxxx)Ceiling mount with lanyard, white (1.5˝ NPT pole required) Specifications General Panel Size (diagonal)......21.5˝, 26˝ and 32˝ diagonal Backlight Type ...........LED, edge-lit Native Aspect Ratio .......16:9 Native Resolution.........1920 x 1080 Brightness ..............22˝ 250 cd/m2, 26˝ 300 cd/m2, 32˝ 350 cd/m2 Contrast Ratio ...........22˝ 1000:1, 26˝ 3000:1, 32˝ 3000:1 Viewing Angle (H/V).......22˝ 170/160, 26˝ 178/178, 32˝ 178/178 Response Time ..........22˝ 5ms, 26˝ 8ms, 32˝ 6.5ms OSD Language ..........English (US), French (Fr), German, Spanish (Int), Italian, Portuguese (Brazilian), Chinese (Si), Dutch Inputs/Outputs Composite Video Input ....1 BNC input Composite Video Output ...1 BNC passive loop-thru output Camera Video Output .....1 BNC output (internal camera) S-Video Input ...........1 (Y/C) input VGA Input ..............1 15 pin D-Sub Plug & Play Monitor .......DDC compatible (DDC 2B) DVI-D Input .............1 HDMI Input .............1 Alarm Input .............1 TTL input (NO or NC) Audio Input .............Stereo audio input 3.5mm Audio Output ............Stereo audio output 3.5mm Speaker Output ..........3W x2 embedded Cameras Image Sensor ...........1/3˝ PIXIM Seawolf 1/3˝ Sony 1.3 megapixel CMOS Video Standard . . . . . . . . . .NTSC/PAL (using single sensor) TVL ...................PIXIM: 690 HTVL Effective Pixels (H/V) ......PIXIM (758 x 540); Sony (1329 x 1049) Scanning System ........PIXIM: 2:1 Interlace; Sony: Progressive scan S/N Ratio ..............More than 50dB Sync System ............Internal/line lock Minimum Illumination ......PIXIM: 0.1 lux (f/1.2, 50 IRE, 30 fps, CMY) Sony: 0.5 lux Shutter Speed ...........PIXIM: up to 1/30.72 sec Sony: flickerless/auto/manual (1/30 ~ 1/12,000) Lens ..................PIXIM: Vari-focal Auto Iris (2.8-10mm/F1.2) Sony: Vari-focal DC-Iris (3.0-10mm/F1.3) Video Output ............1.0 Vp-p composite, 75ohm Video Video Format............NTSC/PAL auto detect Scaning Frequency .......NTSC: 15750Hz ± 500Hz/60 Hz PAL: 15625Hz ± 500Hz/50 Hz TVL ...................650 Electrical Power Consumption ......22˝ < 35W, 26˝ < 50W, 32˝ < 55W Power Input .............DC 24V/2.7A Power Output for Camera ..12V 0.4A Stand-by ...............< 2W Off Mode ...............< 1W Environment Operating Temperature ....32°F to 104°F (0°C to 40°C) Operating Humidity .......10% to 85% (non-condensing) Storage Temperature ......-4°F to 140°F (-20°C to 60°C) Storage Humidity.........10% to 95% (non-condensing) Mechanical Cabinet ................Metal Color ..................Black/White VESA™................200 x 100 mm; 100 x 100 mm Dimension (H x W x D) Body .................21.5˝ 358 x 512 x 80 mm (14.09 x 20.16 x 3.15 in) 26˝ 430 x 628 x 83 mm (16.93 x 24.72 x 3.27 in) 32˝ 505 x 742 x 97 mm (19.88 x 29.21 x 3.82 in) Shipping Box ..........21.5˝ 502 x 563 x 197 mm (19.76 x 22.17 x 7.76 in) 26˝ 554 x 710 x 505 mm (21.81 x 27.95 x 8.07 in) 32˝ 657 x 887 x 223 mm (25.87 x 34.92 x 8.78 in) Weight Monitor Only (Net).......21.5˝ 6.50 kg (14.33 lb), 26˝ 9.00 kg (19.84 lb), 32˝ 14.00 kg (30.86 lb) Shipping ..............21.5˝ 8.50 kg (18.74 lb), 26˝ 11.00 kg (24.25 lb), 32˝ 17.50 kg (38.58 lb) Regulatory UL/cUL, FCC, RoHS, WEEE, Energy Star, CE Accessories (included) CD (User Guide, Quick Start Guide), DC power adapter, power cords, remote control Battery Backup with Surge Protection for Electronics and Computers 350VA - 750VA APC Back-UPS®- “Floor” Style •Reliable •Energy Efficient •User Friendly The Back-UPS family offers guaranteed power protection for wireless networks, computers, gaming consoles and other electronics in your home or business. Models supply battery backup during outages and unsafe voltage fluctuations, as well as provide protection from damaging surges and spikes. They’re available in 'tower' or 'floor' styles (“floor” style shown in this brochure), and together with a variety of standard features, they are the perfect choice to protect your data and keep you connected. BE350G BE450G BE550G BE650G BE750G 1 4 5 7 APC Back-UPS Features - “Floor” Style 8 Standard on all Back-UPS “Floor” models 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 Product Features: “Battery Backup & Surge” Outlets keep CPU, monitor and another critical device running when the power goes out or fluctuates outside safe levels. “Surge Only” Outlets protect printers, faxes or other equipment without reducing battery capacity (including three power-saving “Controlled” outlets on the BE750G). PowerChute Software lets you use your computer to access additional power protection and management features: • Preserves your work, shuts down system during outages • Restarts your system, minimizing work disruptions • Enables customization of your Back-UPS settings • Monitors and displays power and battery status Data Line Surge Protection guards against surges and spikes traveling over data lines. Combination Power Button/LED Indicator provides visual and audible status of unit. Ultra Efficient Electrical Design, RoHS compliance and all recyclable packaging materials minimize environmental impact and maximize efficiency. Building Wiring Fault Indicator lets you know if there are problems in your building’s wiring. Push Button Circuit Breaker enables quick recovery from overload. Automatic Diagnostic Testing ensures your unit is ready when you need it. 3 Yr Warranty, $75,000 Equipment Protection Policy, free technical phone and online support. 8 10 9 2 APC PowerChute®Personal Edition • Easy to read view of current power conditions. • Displays daily energy consumption and cost of powering your equipment. • Saves money by allowing you to choose an energy management plan that fits your needs. • Prevents data corruption by saving files and shutting down your system during extended power outages or low battery condition. • Monitors system, and logs utility power problems and battery conditions • Allows you to configure Back-UPS options like voltage transfer settings, silencing alarms during night hours, shutdown parameters, energy management features, etc.) • Easy Installation takes the guesswork out of configuration for first-time users with a jargon-free help feature. (USB and serial interface). Easy-to-use auto-shutdown software with power and energy management features 731304258926 14.3 lbs 5.5" x 17.25"x 9.5" 13.0 lbs 3.5“ x 12.0” x 7.0” 731304258940 14.3 lbs 5.5" x 17.25"x 9.5" 13.0 lbs 3.5“ x 12.0” x 7.0” 6 ft cord with right angle plug (NEMA 5-15P) FCC Part 15 Class B, FCC Part 68, UL1778, NOM, TUV, CSA C22.2 No.107.1, Compatible with PowerChute Personal Edition (via USB interface) 731304256601 12.54 lbs 17.8" x 10.2"x 5.94" 10.34 lbs 13.5" x 7.1" x 3.5" Analog phone line, RJ-45 (Fax/Modem/DSL) Network line, RJ-45 (Ethernet 10/100 Base-T) Coax cable (Cable Modem/TV/DSS) 10 total NEMA 5-15R: 5 battery & surge 5 surge only (incl. 3 Controlled outlets) 750 VA / 450 W BE750GBE450GBE650GBE550G Not compatible none FCC Part 15 Class B, FCC Part 68, UL1778, NOM, TUV, UL 497A, UL 498 Analog phone line, RJ-11 (Fax, modem, DSL) 450 VA / 257 W FCC Part 15 Class B, FCC Part 68, UL1778, NOM, TUV, UL 497A, UL 498 Visual (LED status indicators) and audible alarms Sealed, lead-acid, maintenance-free 731304258902 Black 9.6 lbs 5.0” x 7.75” x 14.25” 8.0 lbs 3.5” x 6.25” x 11.0” All outlets protected 5 ft cord with right angle plug (NEMA 5-15P) 120V, 50 or 60 Hz, +/- 3Hz Stepped Approximation to Sine Wave 6 total NEMA 5-15R: 3 battery & surge 3 surge only 115V +/-8%, 50 or 60 Hz +/-1 Hz (auto sensing) 120V, 50 or 60 Hz, +/- 3Hz (auto sensing) 350 VA / 210 W BE350G Battery Physical Surge Protection Input Output External Battery Compatibility FCC Part 15 Class B, FCC Part 68, UL1778, TUV 731304256526 16.5 lbs 5.83" x 17.5"x 10.2" 14.3 lbs 3.54“ x 12.6” x 6.97” 650 VA / 390 W Shutdown S/W Safety FCC Part 15 Class B, FCC Part 68, UL 1778, TUV Certification/ Approvals Data Line AC Power 550 VA / 330 WOutput Capacity Unit Weight Shipping Weight Shipping Dims H x W x D Color Battery Type Alarms Management UPC Code Unit Dims H x W x D Input Conn. Input Volt., Freq Waveform Type 8 total NEMA 5-15R outlets: 4 battery backup & surge 4 surge protection only Output Connections Output-on battery Output-on utility Model No. APC by Schneider Electric 132 Fairgrounds Rd West Kingston, RI 02892 www.apc.com Back-UPS Specifications - “Floor” Style 24 /7 T E C H N I C A L S U P P O R T* 1-888-NETGEAR (638-4327) Email: info@NETGEAR.com ProSafe® 8-port 10/100 Switch with 4-port Power over Ethernet Data Sheet FS108P Affordable Power over Ethernet Switching The ProSafe FS108P provides power and data from a single point, using Power over Ethernet (PoE) over a single Cat-5 cable. The eight Fast Ethernet ports can be used for any 10/100 Mbps link and four of these ports can supply industry-standard IEEE 802.3af power. Advanced auto-sensing algorithm gives power only to 802.3af end devices, so no need to worry about damaging proprietary PoE or non-PoE equipment. In addition, it discontinues the power when PoE devices are disconnected. Easy and reliable, the ProSafe FS108P automatically determines PoE requirements, speed, duplex, and cable type using Auto Uplink™. The affordably priced ProSafe FS108P delivers PoE to any small business network that wants to simplify the installation of wireless access points and IP-based surveillance cameras. These devices are optimally installed on a ceiling or high on a wall, away from most electrical outlets. PoE eliminates the requirement for a dedicated electrical outlet to power these devices. This allows for flexibility in situating devices where AC power is difficult to access and lowers installation costs. Compact and flexible, the ProSafe FS108P is ideal for small business networks that need to inexpensively use PoE to deploy wireless access points and IP-based network surveillance cameras. Flexible Choose to plug in up to eight Ethernet or Fast Ethernet devices and mix in up to four 802.3af IP-based devices like wireless access points or IP-based network surveillance cameras. Place these 802.3af-compliant devices where they belong – high up on walls and ceiling for maximum coverage – or anywhere else you need them. Power and data are carried over standard Cat 5 cabling. Plug and Play The standards-based ProSafe FS108P senses and adjusts for network speed and cabling type automatically, for easy integration into your existing 10/100 Ethernet network. For PoE, the switch automatically detects 802.3af-compliant devices, and supplies power as needed. Front panel LEDs keep you informed of switch and PoE status. Quiet and Compact Engineered for compact convenience, it features a 9-inch, durable metal case that is easily positioned on your desktop or a wall, using the included mounting hardware. The fan-less design quietly integrates with your small office environment. Great Value With data switching and Power over Ethernet integrated into one unit, the FS108P saves space, reduces cables and eliminates the requirement for dedicated electrical outlets – lowering installation costs, simplifying installation of PoE-capable devices, and eliminating the need for electricians or extension cords. All in all, a great benefit for a modest price. FVS318 VPN Firewall FS108P ProSafe Switch WG102 AP WG102 AP Desktop PCs Surveillance Camera Internet Notebook PC with WG511T 108 Mbps Wireless PC Card Notebook PC with WG511T 108 Mbps Wireless PC Card ProSafe 802.11g Wireless Access Point ProSafe 802.11g Wireless Access Point LAN WLAN ProSafe 802.11g Wireless Access Point ProSafe 802.11g Wireless Access Point LAN WLAN * 350 E. Plumeria Drive San Jose, CA 95134-1911 USA 1-888-NETGEAR (638-4327) E-mail: info@NETGEAR.com www.NETGEAR.com Technical Specifications • Network Ports –8 auto speed-sensing 10/100 RJ-45 ports • Network Protocol and Standards –IEEE 802.3i 10BASE-T –IEEE 802.3u 100BASE-TX –IEEE 802.1p priority tags –IEEE 802.3x Flow Control –IEEE 802.3af DTE Power via MDI • Performance Specifications –Forwarding modes: Store-and-forward –Bandwidth: 1.6 Gbps –Network latency: Less than 20 μs for 64-byte frames in store-and-forward mode for 100 Mbps to 100 Mbps transmission –Buffer memory: 96 KB embedded memory per unit –Address database size:1,000 media access control (MAC) addresses per system –Addressing: 48-bit MAC address –Mean time between failures (MTBF): 190,000 hours (~ 21 years) –Acoustic noise: 0 dB • Status LEDs –System: Power, PoE maximum Power –Per port: Link, activity, speed, PoE active, PoE fault • Power Supply –Total power consumption: 44W maximum –Total PoE Power budget: 32W maximum –802.3af power consumption: 32W maximum (Ports 1 – 4) –48V DC, 0.8A power output; plug is localized to country of sale • Physical Specifications –Dimensions (H x W x D): 27 x 235 x 103 mm (1.1 x 9.3 x 4.1 in) –Weight: 0.74 kg (1.7 lb) • Environmental Specifications –Operating temperature: 32˚ to 104°F (0˚ to 40° C) –Storage temperature: 14˚ to 158°F (-10˚ to 70°C) –Operating humidity: 90% maximum relative humidity, non-condensing –Storage humidity: 95% maximum relative humidity, non-condensing –Operating altitude: 10,000 ft (3,000 m) maximum –Storage altitude: 10,000 ft (3,000 m) maximum • Electromagnetic Emissions –CE mark, commercial –FCC Part 15 Class B –VCCI Class B –EN 55022 (CISPR 22), Class B –C-Tick, Class B • Electromagnetic Immunity –EN 55024 • Safety –CE mark, commercial –CE/LVD EN 60950 Warranty –NETGEAR Lifetime Warranty † –2 years for power supply ProSupport Service Packs Available • OnCall 24x7, Category 1 –PMB0331-100 (US) –PMB0331 (non-US) • XPressHW, Category 1 –PRR0331 Package Contents –ProSafe 8-port 10/100 Switch with Power over Ethernet (FS108P) –AC Adapter –Wall-mount kit –Installation guide –Warranty/support information card NETGEAR Related Products –ProSafe 802.11g Wireless Access Point (WG302) –ProSafe 802.11g Wireless Access Point (WG102) –NIC 10/100 Low Profile PCI Network Interface Card (FA311) Ordering Information – North America: FS108PNA – Europe - General: FS108PEU – Europe - UK: FS108PUK – Asia: FS108PAU © 2009 NETGEAR, Inc. NETGEAR, the NETGEAR Logo, NETGEAR Digital Entertainer Logo, Connect with Innovation, FrontView, IntelliFi, PowerShift, ProSafe, ProSecure, RAIDar, RAIDiator, X-RAID, RangeMax, ReadyNAS and Smart Wizard are trademarks of NETGEAR, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. Other brand names mentioned herein are for identification purposes only and may be trademarks of their respective holder(s). Information is subject to change without notice. All rights reserved. *Free basic installation support provided for 90 days from date of purchase. Advanced product features and configurations are not included in free basic installation support; optional premium support available. †Lifetime warranty for product purchased after 05/01/2007. For product purchased before 05/01/2007, warranty is 5 years. D-FS108P-3 ProSafe ® 8-port 10/100 Switch with 4-port Power over Ethernet FS108P Product Specifications and Technical Data Product Specifications and Technical Data Product Specifications and Technical Data45 6 8˝ Display 10˝ Display 19˝ Display 22˝ Display 26˝ Display 32˝ Display Professional Series Performance Series Professional Series - Large Panel Model Number ADLCD08PS2B/W ADLCD10WPS2B/W ADLCD19PS1B/W ADLCD22PPS0B/W ADLCD22PPXS0B/W ADLCD26PPS0B/W ADLCD26PPXS0B/W ADLCD32PPS0B/W ADLCD32PPXS0B/W Cabinet/Color Metal/Black & White Metal/Black & White Metal/Black & White Metal/Black & White Metal/Black & White Metal/Black & White Backlight Type LED LED CCFL LED LED LED Aspect Ratio 4:3 16:9 4:3 16:9 16:9 16:9 Resolution 800 x 600 1024 x 600 1280 x 1024 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 Composite Video Input 1 1 1 1 1 1 Composite Video Output 1 1 1 1 1 1 Internal Camera BNC Output 1 1 1 1 1 1 S-Video Input N/A N/A Mini-din 4 pins Y/C Input Y/C Input Y/C Input VGA Input 1 1 1 1 1 1 DVI-D Input N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 HDMI Input N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 Audio Input (Stereo) RCA x 2 (L/R) RCA x 2 (L/R)3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack Speaker Output N/A N/A N/A 3W x 2 spkrs 3W x 2 spkrs 3W x 2 spkrs DVR Record for Internal Camera Yes - 16GB Micro SD Yes - 16GB Micro SD No No No No Built-In Media Player Yes - 16GB SD Yes - 16GB SD Yes - 16GB SD No No No Text Message Yes - User definable Yes - User definable Yes - User definable Yes Yes Yes Switch Display on Motion Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Camera Specifications 1/3˝ Pixim® Seawolf (WDR) 1/3˝ Pixim Seawolf (WDR) 1/3˝ PIXIM Seawolf (WDR) 1/3˝ Pixim Seawolf (WDR) 1/3˝ 1.3 MP CMOS 1/3˝ Pixim Seawolf (WDR) 1/3˝ 1.3 MP CMOS 1/3˝ Pixim Seawolf (WDR) 1/3˝ 1.3 MP CMOS Power Adapter Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Power Display Input 12V or 24VDC 12V or 24VDC 24VDC 24VDC 24VDC 24VDC Power Output/ External Camera N/A N/A 12VDC 12VDC 12VDC 12VDC Power Consumption <10W <10W <30W <35W <50W <55W Remote Control Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Dimensions (w/o stand) 148 x 236 x 40 mm (5.83 x 9.29 x 1.58 in) 161 x 289 x 37 mm (6.34 x 11.4 x 1.5 in) 440 x 463 x 81 mm (17.32 x 18.23 x 3.2 in) 358 x 512 x 80 mm (14.09 x 20.16 x 3.15 in) 430 x 628 x 83 mm (16.93 x 24.72 x 3.27 in) 505 x 742 x 97 mm (19.88 x 29.21 x 3.82 in) Weight (w/o stand)1.25 kg (2.76 lb)1.50 kg (3.31 lb)8.60 kg (18.96 lb)6.50 kg (14.33 lb)9.00 kg (19.84 lb)14.00 kg (30.86 lb) VESA™ Mount 75 x 75 mm 75 x 75 mm 100 x 100 mm 200 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 200 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 200 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm Compatible Mounts (see legend)2 2 1, 3, 4, 10, 11 1, 3, 4, 10 7, 8, 10 7, 8, 10 Public View Monitors 3” Wall Mount 3” Wall Mount Single Arm Wall Mount Articulating Wall Mount Pivot Mount with Pole Kit Pole Clamp Flat Wall Mount Titlting Wall Mount Ceiling Mount Ceiling Mount Universal Rack Mount 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ADMMWT100B ADMMWT100W ADMMWT75B ADMMWT75W ADMMWTAS100B ADMMWTAS100W ADMMWTAD100B ADMMWTAD100W ADMMWT75PKITB ADMMWT75PKITW AMMPCLB AMMPCLW ADWF2642B ADWT2642B ADCTR3255B ADCTR3255W ADCT75100B ADCT75100W ADRK920B Mounts For more information on the products featured here or on any other American Dynamics product contact your American Dynamics Account Representative Please visit us at www.americandynamics.net All information is correct at the time of printing. Product specifications and availability is subject to change without notice. Certain product names mentioned herein may be trade names and/or trademarks of their companies. AD0300-BR-201404-R02-LT-EN ©2014 Tyco Security Products. All rights reserved. Video Surveillance Monitors Product Specifications and Technical Data Product Specifications and Technical Data Product Specifications and Technical Data1 3 17˝ Display 19˝ Display 19˝ W Display 22˝ W Display 8” Performance 17” Performance 19” Performance 17” Professional 19” Professional 22˝ Display 24˝ Display 32˝ Display 42˝ Display 55˝ Display Performance Series Performance Series Professional Series Professional Series - Large Panel Model Number ADLCD17GB ADLCD19GB ADLCD19WGB ADLCD22GB ADLCD08MB ADLCD17MB ADLCD19MB ADLCD17MPB ADLCD19MPB ADLCD22MPB ADLCD24MPB ADLCD32MPB ADLCD42MPB ADLCD55MPB Cabinet Material/Color ABS Plastic/Black ABS Plastic/Black ABS Plastic/Black ABS Plastic/Black Metal/Black ABS Plastic/Black ABS Plastic/Black ABS Plastic/Black ABS Plastic/Black ABS Plastic/Black Metal/Black Metal/Black Metal/Black Metal/Black Backlight Type CCFL CCFL LED LED LED CCFL CCFL CCFL CCFL LED LED LED LED LED Aspect Ratio 5:4 5:4 16:9 16:9 4:3 5:4 5:4 5:4 5:4 16:9 16:9 16:9 16:9 16:9 Resolution 1280 x 1024 1280 x 1024 1366 x 768 1920 x 1080 800 x 600 1280 x 1024 1280 x 1024 1280 x 1024 1280 x 1024 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 Composite Video Input N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Composite Video Output N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Camera Audio Input (Stereo)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 sets RCA (R/L)2 sets RCA (R/L)2 sets RCA (R/L)2 sets RCA (R/L)2 sets RCA (R/L) S-Video Input N/A N/A N/A N/A Mini-din 4 pins Mini-din 4 pins Mini-din 4 pins N/A N/A N/A Y/C input Y/C input Y/C input Y/C input S-Video Output N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Y/C output Y/C output Y/C output Y/C output VGA Input 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 DVI-D Input 1 1 1 1 N/A N/A N/A DVI to HDMI cable DVI to HDMI cable DVI to HDMI cable 1 1 1 1 HDMI Input N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Audio Input 3.5 mm jack 3.5mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack RCA 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack 3.5 mm jack Speaker Output 1W x 2 spkrs 1W x 2 spkrs 1W x 2 spkrs 1W x 2 spkrs 1W x 2 spkrs 1W x 2 spkrs 1W x 2 spkrs 1W x 2 spkrs 1W x 2 spkrs 1W x 2 spkrs 5W x 2 spkrs 5W x 2 spkrs 5W x 2 spkrs 5W x 2 spkrs Power Adapter Integrated Integrated Integrated Integrated External - 12VDC/3A External - 12VDC/3A External - 12VDC/3A External - 12VDC/3A External - 12VDC/3A External - 12VDC/4.16A External - 24VDC/2.7A External - 24VDC/2.7A External - 24VDC/5.0A External - 24VDC/7.5A Power Output for External Camera N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12VDC/0.4A 12VDC/0.4A 12VDC/0.4A 12VDC/0.4A Power Consumption <30W <30W <30W <30W <7W <22W <23W <26W <28W <32W <40W <55W <90W <160W Dimensions (w/o Stand)358 x 384 x 195 mm (14.09 x 15.12 x 7.68 in) 388 x 422 x 195 mm (15.28 x 16.61 x 7.68 in) 337 x 444 x 172 mm (13.27 x 17.48 x 6.77 in) 373 x 477 x 202 mm (14.7 x 18.78 x 7.95 in) 202 x 176 x 29 mm (7.95 x 6.94 x 1.15 in) 371 x 325 x 54 mm (14.61 x 12.8 x 2.13 in) 419 x 358 x 54 mm (16.5 x 14.09 x 2.13 in) 371 x 325 x 54 mm (14.61 x 12.8 x 2.13 in) 419 x 358 x 54 mm (16.5 x 14.09 x 2.13 in) 513 x 326 x 58 mm (20.2 x 12.83 x 2.28 in) 402 x 571 x 243 mm (15.83 x 22.48 x 9.57 in) 504 x 742 x 230 mm (19.84 x 29.21 x 9.06 in) 645 x 977 x 270 mm (25.39 x 38.46 x 10.63 in) 790 x 1254 x 270 mm (31.10 x 49.37 x 10.63 in) Weight (w/o Stand)3.20 kg (7.05 lb)4.00 kg (8.82 lb)2.25 kg (4.96 lb)3.55 kg (7.83 lb)1.12 kg (2.47 lb)2.7 kg (5.95 lb)3.3 kg (7.28 lb)3.27 kg (7.21 lb)4.04 kg (8.91 lb)3.92 kg (8.64 lb)8.80 kg (19.40 lb)13.60 kg (29.98 lb)21.90 kg (48.28 lb)33.0 kg (72.75 lb) VESA™ Mount 100 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 75 x 75 mm 100 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 200 x 100 mm 100 x 100 mm 400 x 200 mm 200 x 200 mm 400 x 200 mm 200 x 200 mm 600 x 400 mm Compatible Mounts (see legend)1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 4, 5, 8, 11, 13 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12 9, 10, 12 General Purpose Monitors Multiple Input Monitors Comparison Chart 3” Wall Mount Single Arm Wall Mount Articulating Wall Mount Articulating Wall Mount Single Arm Wall Mount 3-Axis Wall Mount Pole Clamp Flat Wall Mount Flat Wall Mount Tilting Wall Mount Tilting Wall Mount Ceiling Mount Ceiling Mount Unistrut Ceiling Mount 3’-5’ Unistrut Ceiling Mount 5’-9’ Unistrut Ceiling Mount 8’-15’ Hard Ceiling Pole Mounts 4’ Universal Rack Mount 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ADMMWT100B ADMMWT100W ADMMWTAS100B ADMMWTAS100W ADMMWTAD100B ADMMWTAD100W ADWA2200B ADWA2200W ADWA1200B ADWA1200W ADMMWTR100B ADMMWTR100W ADMMPCLB ADMMPCLW ADWF2642B ADWF4255B ADWT4255B ADWT2642B ADCTR3255B ADCTR3255W ADCT75100B ADCT75100W ADMUP100B-5 ADMUP100W-5 ADMUP100B-9 ADMUP100W-9 ADMUP100B-15 ADMUP100W-15 ADMHCP100B-4 ADMHCP100W-4 ADRK920B Mounts B = Black W = White Ordering Guide: SCN#Item SF630P Universal Flat Wall Mount for 10-24" LCD Screen, 75/100mm, black ST630P Universal Tilt Wall Mount for 10-24" LCD Screens, 75/100mm, black PA730 Articulating Wall Arm for 10-22" LCD Screens, 75/100mm, 14.46” extension, black LCC-18 LCD Ceiling Mount, Pendant, 18-30", 75/100mm, black LCC-18C LCD Ceiling Mount, Pendant, 18-30", 75/100mm, w/cord cover, black LCC-36 LCD Ceiling Mount, Pendant, 30-48", 75/100mm, black LCC-36C LCD Ceiling Mount, Pendant, 30-48", 75/100mm, w/cord cover, black ACC852 Extension Column Cord Wrap 4 2’ sections, black ACC852W Extension Column Cord Wrap 4 2’ sections, white ACC856 Extension Column Cord Wrap 4 6’ sections, black ACC856W Extension Column Cord Wrap 4 6’ sections, white ACC109 Extension Column Connector, female/female 1,1/2” - 11.5 NPT, black EXT101 1' fixed length, 1-1/2" - 11.5 NPT, sch 40, threaded, notched, black EXT102 2' fixed length, 1-1/2" - 11.5 NPT, sch 40, threaded, notched, black EXT103 3' fixed length, 1-1/2" - 11.5 NPT, sch 40, threaded, notched, black EXT104 4' fixed length, 1-1/2" - 11.5 NPT, sch 40, threaded, notched, black EXT108 8' fixed length, 1-1/2" - 11.5 NPT, sch 40, threaded, notched, black ADJ012018 12"-18" adjustable extension, 1-1/2" - 11.5 NPT sch 40, threaded, notched, 1" increment height adjustment, black ADJ0203 2'-3' adjustable extension, 1-1/2"- 11.5 NPT sch 40, threaded, notched, 1" increment height adjustment, black ADJ0406 4'-6' adjustable extension, 1-1/2" - 11.5 NPT sch 40, threaded, notched, 1" increment height adjustment, black ADJ0810 8'-10' adjustable extension, 1-1/2" - 11.5 NPT sch 40, threaded, notched, 1" increment height adjustment, black CMJ470 Ceiling Plate for 16" joist centers, black ACC550 Unistrut Adapter for Truss Ceiling, w/hardware, black CMJ300 Unistrut and Structured Ceiling Plate, 1-1/2"-11.5 NPT,4"x4", black CMJ310 Unistrut and Structured Ceiling Plate, 1-1/2"-11.5 NPT, 8"x8", black ACC640C Escutcheon Ring (appearance ring), chrome ACC640W Escutcheon Ring (appearance ring), white A-CS777 Universal Adjustable Wall Mount (3-axis), 75/100mm, black A-CSW775E Universal Adjustable Extension Pendent Ceiling Mount, 26.4” to 36.6”, 75/100mm, white A-CSB775E Universal Adjustable Extension Pendent Ceiling Mount, 26.4” to 36.6”, 75/100mm, black Small LCD/PVM Panel Mounts V i d e o S u r v e i l l a n c e SF630P Universal Flat Wall Mount • Fits most 10" to 24" flat panel screens • VESA ®75 and 100 compatible • Ultra-slim design less than an 1” • Screen adapter plate simply hooks onto the wall plate for quick and easy installation • Includes installation hardware • UL listed • Black color A-CS777 Universal Adjustable (3-axis) Wall Mount • Fits most 10” – 23” flat panel screens • VESA ®75 and 100mm compatible • Extends from the wall, 5” • Pan adjustment - unlimited •Tilt adjustment ±90° •Includes installation hardware • Black, silver color LCC SERIES LCD Ceiling Mount • Comes in two adjustable height ranges (in 1" increments): 18"-30" and 36"-48", -5° to +20° adjustable tilt • Portrait or landscape orientation • Ceiling plate included for structural ceilings •Cord management covers with dual cord management channels included with all models ending in "C" • Hardware included •Theft resistant security fasteners • VESA ®75/100 mm compatible •360°swivel action (at time of installation) • UL listed • Black or white ST630P Universal Tilting Wall Mount • Fits most 10" to 24" flat panel screens • VESA ®75 and 100 compatible • One-touch tilt allows adjustment of +15/-5° without the use of tools • Screen adapter plate simply hooks onto the wall plate for quick and easy installation • Includes installation hardware • UL listed • Black color PA730 Articulating Arm •For 10"-22" LCD flat panel screens up to 25 lb • Cable management • VESA ®75/100 compatible • Extends from the wall up to 14.46" •Folds flat to 1.23" • Adjustable pivot points provide tension control •Tilt range ±35° •Pan range 180°swivel +/- 5º of roll • Includes installation hardware • Pre-assembled for quick installation • UL listed •Black color A-CSW775E / A-CSB775E Universal Adjustable Length Ceiling Mount • Fits most 10” – 23” flat panel screens •VESA®75 and 100mm compatible • Adjustable length 26.4” to 36.6” • Adjustable swivel head (pan 180°, tilt ±15°) •Includes installation hardware • Black or white color AVAILABLE IN BLACK AVAILABLE IN BLACK T1577-02 ©2009 ADT Security Services, Inc. FIXED LENGTH EXTENSION CABLES EXTxxx: Fixed Length Extension Columns are constructed of 11/2” 11.5 NPT schedule 40 pipe threaded and notched on both ends for safety locking. Features •Extension column lengths measure 3.5" longer to provide finished drop length for various mounts (i.e. ADJ012018 measures 21.5") •Max Load: 1200 lbs •Black HEIGHT-ADJUSTABLE EXTENSION COLUMNS ADJxxx: The Adjustable Extension Column is compatible with flat panel mounts. This product is for use with single display installations. Features: • 1-1/2" - 11.5 NPT Schedule 40 pipe threaded on both ends. Notched for use with screw to provide safety and security • Height adjustment at 1" increments • Extension column lengths measure 3.5" longer to provide finished drop length for various mounts (i.e. ADJ012018 measures 21.5") • Max Load: 900 lbs • Black WOOD JOISTS OR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE CEILING PLATES CMJ470: The Ceiling Plate can be attached to a finished ceiling (wood joists) or wood beam using the four washer head wood screws included, or a structural ceiling (concrete) using a concrete anchor accessory kit. Features: • Mounts to wood joists or structural concrete ceiling (requires concrete anchor, sold separately) • Unit has 1-1/2"-11.5 NPT fitting for attachment of extension column •CMJ470 for 16" joist centers • Max Load: 300 lbs • Black UNISTRUT ADAPTER FOR TRUSS CEILING ACC550: Used for flat panel applications, allowing assembly weighing upto 250lbs to be mounted below unistrut - includes all hardware. Features: • For use with 1 5/8" x 1 5/8", 12 gauge Unistrut • Unit has 1 1/2" 11.5 NPT fitting for attachment of extension column •Max Load: 250 lbs • Black UNISTRUT AND STRUCTURAL CEILING PLATE CMJ300 & CMJ310: The CMJ300 (4”x 4”) & CMJ310 (8”x 8”) ceiling plates attach to standard 1 5/8” x 1 5/8” unistrut or to a solid structural surface. Features: • Unistrut fittings and attachment hardware not included • Unit has 1-1/2"-11.5 NPT fitting for attachment of extension column • Max Load: 250 lbs •Black ESCUTCHEON RING ACC640C & ACC640W:The Chrome and White Escutcheon Rings visually enhance suspended ceiling installations by covering the hole where extension column passes through ceiling tile. Ring is hinged to open, wrap around 1 1/2" schedule 40 extension column snap into place to cover hole in ceiling tile. Specifications SF630P Dimensions: (W x H x D) 6.02” x 5.75” x 1.0” (15.3 x 14.6 x 2.5 cm) Weight: 1.7 lb (0.8 kg) Shipping weight: 2.5 lb (1.1 kg) Maximum Load Capacity: 80 lb (36.2 kg) ST630P Dimensions: (W x H x D) 5.15” x 6.20” x 1.58” (13.1 x 15.7 x 4.0 cm) Weight: 2.1 lb (0.95 kg) Shipping weight: 2.9 lb (1.3 kg) Maximum Load Capacity: 80 lb (36.2 kg) PA730 Dimensions: (W x H x D) 4.7" - 8.96" x 5.5 x 1.23" - 14.46" (11.9 - 22.8 x 14 x 3.1 - 36.7 cm) Weight: 2.15 lb (1 kg) Shipping weight: 2.82 lb (1.3 kg) Maximum Load Capacity: 25.0 lb (11.4 kg) LCC Series LCC 18-C Dimensions: (W x H x D) 6.33” x 20.26”-33.265” x 6.33” (16.1 x 51.4-84.4 x 16.1 cm) Weight: 5.4 lb (2.4 kg) Shipping weight:7.3 lb (3.3 kg) Maximum Load Capacity: 40 lb (18.1 kg) LCC 36-C Dimensions: (W x H x D) 6.33” x 37.76”-50.76” x 6.33” (16.1 x 95.1-128.9 x 16.1 cm) Weight: 7.4 lb (3.4 kg) Shipping weight: 10.6 lb (4.8 kg) Maximum Load Capacity:40 lb (18.1 kg) A-CS777 Dimensions (W x H xD) 4.45” x 2.87” x 5.04” (113 x 73 x 128 mm) Weight 3.1 lb (1.41 kg) Shipping Weight 3.6 lb (1.64 kg) Maximum Load Capacity 24 lb (11kg) A-CSW775E / A-CSB775E Extension Length 26.4” to 36.6” (670 to 930 mm) VESA plate (W x H)5.2” x 4.7” (132 x 120 mm) Weight 6.6 lb (3.0 kg) Shipping Weight 7.7 lb (3.5 kg) Maximum Load Capacity 20 lb (9kg) Accessories EXTENSION COLUMN CORD WRAP ACC852 Cord Wrap 4 2’ sections, black ACC852W Cord Wrap 4 2’ sections, white ACC856 Cord Wrap 4 6’ sections, black ACC856W Cord Wrap 4 6’ sections, white Features: • Designed to externally route cords along outside of extension column •Sections can be stacked to create longer lengths or cut to desired length EXTENSION COLUMN CONNECTORS ACC109: Extension column connectors are used in flat panel installations to join two extension columns (EXT series) for a total extension of up to 20'. Features: • Security screens included • Max Load: 1200 lbs •Black Corporate: 1300 Bristol Street North, Suite 100 Newport Beach CA 92660 Orange Location: 2045 N. Tustin Street Orange, CA 92865 www.RapidsExpress.com January 22th, 2021 RE: Camera Surveillance To Whom it May Concern, The following are standard surveillance measures that we currently employ at our location in Orange and will be implementing at the subject property at Sunkist/Ball Rd, Anaheim: • Installation of a high definition, state-of-the-art camera surveillance system featuring over 40 HD cameras that will record both the inside of the building as well as whole property outside of the building on the proposed parcel. • Specific emphasis will be placed on camera angles that record along the back of the property between the car wash tunnel and rear wall closest to the adjacent residences in order to dissuade any homelessness or loitering during closed hours. • Actively monitored alarm system by ADT. I am proud to say we have never had any problems at our current location and do not anticipate any here. Our prototype building is designed to have a light and airy feel with lots of windows which also provides the ability to see directly through the tunnel from the front of the property to the back of the property. Compared to the existing improvements, our project will be a significant upgrade with building features and a camera system that will thwart any unwanted after-hour activities that may currently exist at the property. Best Regards, Geoff Von Der Ahe President Rapids Express Car Wash Corporate: 1300 Bristol Street North, Suite 100 Newport Beach CA 92660 Orange Location: 2045 N. Tustin Street Orange, CA 92865 www.RapidsExpress.com January 22th, 2021 RE: Camera System The following is currently Rapids Express’ standard commercial grade camera system installed at every location. The location at Ball & Sunkist in Anaheim will have the following: - Forty (40+) commercial grade cameras 5mp – 8mp high definition o Approx. Fifteen (15) 4k Ultra High Definition 8mp o Approx. Twenty-Five (25) Ultra High Definition 5mp - Outdoor rated and waterproof with daytime and nighttime infrared - Approx. 6 weeks of stored recording Site Plan with Preliminary Camera Layout 1 2 3,4 5, 6, 7, 8 9,10 11 12 13, 14, 15 14 16, 17, 18 19- 24 25 26, 27 28-40 ATTACHMENT NO. 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 11 4/7/2021 Gmail - Variance to accommodate our neighbors' request https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=747c351d74&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1689699935023807960&simpl=msg-f%3A16896999350…1/1 Shira Zaghi <shirazaghi@gmail.com> Variance to accommodate our neighbors' request Diane Mcnall <alwayskake@yahoo.com>Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 9:36 AM To: Shira Zaghi <shirazaghi@gmail.com> We listened to the meeting Wednesday evening and also spoke with commissioner that afternoon. We discussed a 10’ wall with a 2’ plexiglass extension (10 + 2 = 12). This was also brought up at the meeting. We like this idea even better than 8’ with 4’ extension. Please query the neighbors for their input on 10’ idea. Diane and Bob Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad [Quoted text hidden] 4/7/2021 Gmail - Variance to accommodate our neighbors' request https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=747c351d74&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1689747933046272644&simpl=msg-f%3A16897479330…1/1 Shira Zaghi <shirazaghi@gmail.com> Variance to accommodate our neighbors' request TreeTop Branch <revol21st@yahoo.com>Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 10:19 PM To: Shira Zaghi <shirazaghi@gmail.com> Cc: kduong116@yahoo.com Hi Shira: I agree with the two neighbors for the (10+2) wall as long as we make sure the cinder block construction has concrete filled in to maintain the wall’s ten feet height. If we did that it will not collapse and keeps people on both sides of the wall happy. Tri Sent from my iPhone [Quoted text hidden] ATTACHMENT NO. 12 Regardless of our position on the proposed development at 250L-2525 E. Ball Road, we, the below signed residents of Hilda Street directly behind the property, stand in support of the variance that would allow for a ten-foot sound wall with an additional two-foot plexiglass barrier between the development and our property line. NAME A-r )' t,/ u ADDRESS / lg Ll t 11, |J^ f,/- 4/7/2021 Gmail - Variance to accommodate our neighbors' request https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=747c351d74&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1689699935023807960&simpl=msg-f%3A16896999350…1/1 Shira Zaghi <shirazaghi@gmail.com> Variance to accommodate our neighbors' request Diane Mcnall <>Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 9:36 AM To: Shira Zaghi <shirazaghi@gmail.com> We listened to the meeting Wednesday evening and also spoke with commissioner that afternoon. We discussed a 10’ wall with a 2’ plexiglass extension (10 + 2 = 12). This was also brought up at the meeting. We like this idea even better than 8’ with 4’ extension. Please query the neighbors for their input on 10’ idea. Diane and Bob Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad [Quoted text hidden] 4/7/2021 Gmail - Variance to accommodate our neighbors' request https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=747c351d74&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1689747933046272644&simpl=msg-f%3A16897479330…1/1 Shira Zaghi <shirazaghi@gmail.com> Variance to accommodate our neighbors' request TreeTop Branch <>Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 10:19 PM To: Shira Zaghi <shirazaghi@gmail.com> Cc: Hi Shira: I agree with the two neighbors for the (10+2) wall as long as we make sure the cinder block construction has concrete filled in to maintain the wall’s ten feet height. If we did that it will not collapse and keeps people on both sides of the wall happy. Tri Sent from my iPhone [Quoted text hidden] Responses f om tou ng H lda St eet Ne ghbo s on 10.29.20 w th M ke and Ch s HOUSE #NAME Sh ra, Chris and Mike visited on 10-29 PREFERENCE ON WALL 4-Nov Shira and Mike visited on 11-17 Shira and Chris visited again on 1/7 21-Jan 22-Jan 23-Jan 24-Jan 25-Jan 26-Jan 2-Feb 5-Apr 6-Apr 1182 Hen y Schenk Wasn't home. Left a hand w tten note w th wa l su vey. Rece ved ema l Heng Schenk (owne ) sent an ema l espond ng to my lette fo h s tenant. He would l ke the wall to be eplaced plus 4 foot of plex glass Ema led to let them know about the appl cat on fo the va ance --conf med back Ema led to ask f he would app ove 10 2 Emaled M . Scheck to ask f he app oves of 10 2 He wants to ask a ound what othe ne ghbo s th nk. Approves majority vote ema led h m to s gn pet t on Knocked on doo not home 1184 T and Kyyla Wasn't home. Left a hand w tten note w th wa l su vey. Ema led on 12 21. Texted and left VM on 12.22no esponse ema led aga n on 12/29 Kyyla and T . D d not want to talk n pe son Ema led me the esponse They a e opposed to the p oject The p efe ence fo the wa l s to have a double wall. Also conce ned about sound. Responded to ema l on 1-8 add ess ng the conce ns Ema led to let them know about the appl cat on fo the va ance --conf med back Ema led to ask f he would app ove 10 2. Confirmed he wants 10 2 Ema led to elabo ate on the specs of the wall ema led h m to s gn pet t on. Also offe ed to be n a ea tomo ow to phys ca ly s gn and answe quest ons Baby was s ck and asked that I use h s ema l n l eu of s gnatu e 1186 Anh T an Wasn't home. Left a hand w tten note w th wa l su vey. wants to keep wall and have t e nfo ced w th blue o wh te plex glass toppe Called Anh T an App oved New 8 ft wall plus clea plex glass Texted M . T an to ask f he app oves 10 2 Conf med wants 10 2 Knocked on doo not home 1188 Eugene Valued educat on App ec ated sound study sa d he would s de w th Bob and D ane l ked the dea of t ple paned w ndows l kes wall to be eplaced emembe ed sh a D d not want to talk too much because of COVID W ll ng to eplace back wa l W ll a ee to whatev Bob and D ane dec e Called h s daughte , Left vo cema l and sent text. Texted Eugene Spoke to h m. Confirmed he wants 10 2 Knocked on doo not home 1190 Bob and D ane McNa l B ggest Oppos t on on block Wants us to keep ex st ng tenants and bu ld a pa k on undeveloped land need to follow up w th sound study I th nk they can be conv nced f we pe suade them no add t onal no se wanted to th nk t ove . Sh a and Ch s went on 11-4-20 to d op of sound study and 7-Eleven coffee w th hand w tten note f om sh a. D ane seemed mo e pleasant and app ec ated gestu e We en't home. Left them anothe wall su vey w th handw tten note M y T y y a e c culat ng a pet t on th ough ne ghbo hood. They w ll be ok w th e nfo c ng wall and plex glass. They have t ees n backya d-- need to make su e that we don t damage them w th bu ld ng wall. They also want us to add t ple pane w ndows to theu k tchen, sl de and back bed ooms. Ema led D ane. She p ev ously ok'ed the new wall plus plex glass. Let he know that we a e ask ng fo a va ance D ane ema led me to ask f we can change f om 8 4 to 10 2. I esponded that I w ll que y ne ghbo s Ema led D ane to let he know ne ghbo s p efe 10 2 ema led he to s gn pet t on. Also offe ed to be n a ea tomo ow to phys ca ly s gn and answe quest ons Knocked on doo and d d not get an answe 1192 Fat ma R ck Lee Best suppo te on block s ok w th anth ng loves 7-eleven husband d ves a m le out to 7-eleven nstead of go ng to l quo sto e on ex st ng p ope ty loves dea of f ee ca washes ok w th anyth ng Spoke w th S ste , Nancy. Fat ma's husband s En que. Ema led Fat ma. She had al eady suppo ted the dea Ema led Fat ma about 10 2 Ema led R ck Lee @ I also spoke w th h m fo 30 m n and updated on ent ety of p oject. Wants 10 2 ema led h m to s gn pet t on. Also offe ed to be n a ea tomo ow to phys ca ly s gn and answe quest ons Fat ma s gned the pet t on 1194 Steve Halbe t Only M ke spoke w th h m Wants to see sound study wants to th nk t ove emebe ed Sh a f om town meet ng. Ret ed…was an eng nee fo the c ty. Has cyp ess t ees n back that he would l ke t mmed by develope s. Left h m a sound study too. W ll be ok w th nc eas ng he ght of wall as long as we help w th ya dwo k. Steve Halbe Spoke to h m fo about an hou . Good suppo te . L kes both uses. OK to e nfo ce wall. Ema led Steve conf med Ema led Steve about 10 2 Ema led Steve follow up to conf m 10 2 Conf med he wants 10 2 ema led h m to s gn pet t on. Also offe ed to be n a ea tomo ow to phys ca ly s gn and answe quest ons Steve s gned and told me he w ll speak at PC on Mon 1196 Dan el and Ma y P efe ed layout w th que ng n the f ont Suppo ted us befo e but wants to th nk t ove wants to th nk t ove . Dan el was n a zoom meet ng but we left h m a wall su vey. Cont nued w th Ma y ove a st ng of ema ls Ideas Ma y offe ed -Block ng off a ley w th walls c eat ng an empty space -Annex ng 5 feet f om the back of ou p ope ty to w den he backya d -Loves f ee ca washes -Tall t ees -asked fo us to e ect a toppe on east/west wa ls of he backya d Asked fo a phone confe ence. App ec ates all ou effo ts to ass t. Wants a new wall w th plex glass. Asked fo t not to happen du ng summe months L kes f ee ca washes. Asked fo t ple pane w ndows n the back of he house. Wants us to move he wall toppe s to the east and west. Asked fo updates as we p oceed. Was ve y mp essed w th all ou effo ts to help tenants Ema led Ma y Ma y ema led me to ask f we can do 10 2. I esponded that I w ll que y ne ghbo s sent ema l followup to not fy that most ne ghbo s p efe 10 2 amd that we w ll be apply ng fo th s va ance Ma y asked f we could do 10 4. Responded that 8 was pe sound code. 10 was the c ty's ecommendat on we a e go ng 2 feet above c ty's eccomendat on upon he equest. ema led he to s gn pet t on. Also offe ed to be n a ea tomo ow to phys ca ly s gn and answe quest ons Dan el s gned. Ma y showed me he backya d to talk about bu ld ng wall 1198 M s. Pa k and Pat ck Olde Ko ean lady w th son Pat ck. Ve y skept cal and want to th nk t ove wants to th nk t ove sa d they w ll ag ee w th Dan el and Ma y. L ke the dea of eplac ng wall w th plex glass Recove ed f om Cov d. Dec d ng between e nfo c ng o new wall. She s conce ned f om an nsu ance pe spect ve and wants to conf m w th he nsu ance agent befo e dec d ng between new wall vs e nfo c ng Cell Texted Pat ck Called and left vo cema l Not home 1185 La am e J m McDonald wo ed about gas mpact to ga den w ll get back to me Gave h m a O l and Gas Rev ew on st ct laws of CA fo gas stat ons. Seemed conv nced. He s ok w th wall plus plex glass wants new wall plus plex glass Ema led J m w th update He had al eady app oved Texted J m w th update Called and left vo cema l Texted me to conf rm that he wants 10 2 S gned pet t on 1181 S. La am e E c R Gatl n wasn't home. left wa l su vey wasn t home. Left wa l su vey w th handw tten note J m sa d they both ag ee to do wall w th plex glass J m also sa d t was th s ne ghbo that conv nced h m.not home but w ll s de w th J m Texted 9 Called and left vo cema l Texted E c Gatl n to ask f he app oves 10 2 Texted aga n to ask f he wants 10 2 s gned pet ton he was conce ned about how long the back would be exposed. I calld Blake (cont acto ) sa d 2 weeks Wayne Carvalho Planning Commission Regarding the proposed project located at 2501-2525 East Ball Road. I am writing this letter in opposition to the above stated project. I live at As someone who lives in the immediate vicinity of the project, I am hoping that you consider mine and my neighbors’ opinions about the project in its current design. I am all for the development of the property however I think yet another gas station and car wash is a horrible idea for the property. There are already several gas stations and car washes within a very close radius. I do not think it is fair to the existing businesses to let another gas station or car wash be built. I was told at the initial design proposal meeting at Sunkist Library that the car wash would be built with consideration of noise levels and that there will be security cameras as not to allow vagrants around the property. I think these are empty promises. I have never been to a car wash that was quiet. Even if the machinery is noise dampened there would be a dozen car vacuums running, which would disturb the homes along the property line. Also, there are already homeless around the 57 off ramps, I believe that with the 7/11 being there that it would bring them in closer to my neighborhood. I believe with the upcoming development of Anaheim Vibe; it would be a waste to allow this project to proceed in its current form. The cities goal is to give a face to the city of Anaheim and since this property is directly adjacent to that it would be a missed opportunity to continue the improvement to the area. I am asking that you locate businesses like car washes and gas station to the industrial areas of town and promote the development of retail and food locations that would benefit the surrounding neighborhood. Regards, Daniel Tallha LATE CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From:Matthew Kari To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Sunkist & Ball Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 3:37:55 PM Dear Sir, My name is Matthew Kari and I am writing you to please consider the following thoughts. I was born and raised in Buena Park and growing up I remember places like The Japanese Dear Farm, Cars of the Stars, Sambo's, Alfie's Fish&Chips, Sundowner's, and Bob's Big Boy to name a few. At the end of the day I know money makes the decisions.... after all, the city wants their tax revenue. Just once, I'd like to see the little guy win. As I had Children, and they grew up, I would tell them about the above places and that sad to me that there is fewer and fewer places left that resemble them. Please, the last thing we need is another 7-11 and car wash. Not to mention the crime, vagrancy, and pan handling that seems to follow 24 hour conscience stores around. Instead, be an actual HERO and help JAGERHAUS realize their dream project. Thank you for your time and consideration. Warm Regards, Matt Kari 3° Freemason Yorba Linda 469 32° Scottish Rite Anaheim Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail on Android LATE CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From: To:Wayne Carvalho; Planning Commission; Subject:2501-2525 East Ball Road Project Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 5:27:37 PM Hi Wayne, Thank you for your guidance to access Public hearing today. I don't see my input from correspondence, would you mind include my feedback as well. Please hide my personal information(name and email) would like to keep it anonymous. Best Wishes, Lee On Friday, February 12, 2021, 10:20:35 PM PST, wrote: Hi Wayne, It was nice to talk to you on the phone. I personally strongly rejected to use the land behind the house for Gas Station, Car Wash and Convenient Store. Due to following facts: 1. 24hr Convenient Store will draw the different type of crowds to the area which may reduce the safety of neighborhood and increase the chance of nuisance throughout the day. 2. Gas Station chemical leak is unavoidable after long term usage which will cause the backyard fruits and vegetables inedible after pollution. 3. More cars will be drawn to Gas Station and Car Wash which will increase air pollution and dust level. 4. Automat Car Wash machine will generate loud noise in the neighborhood may disrupt peace of rest. Due to the factors above, I am strongly against the approval for the use of land to build Gas Station, Car Wash and Convenient Store and we should keep the serenity of residential area. Please let me know if you need additional information. Best Wishes, Lee (Owner of property on S Hilda Street, Anaheim, CA) LATE CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Preserve Jagerhaus German Restaurant Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 3:33:20 PM Don’t kill a viable small business that our community loves!!! Jagerhaus German Restaurant We love this place and no one needs another car wash in place of a well respected small business. It’s shocking that you’d even consider such a change!!! Sincerely, Tom Pleickhardt LATE CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From:Vern P Nelson To:Planning Commission Subject:Item No. 3 - the proposed project at Sunkist & Ball. Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 2:59:23 PM I hope you will all consider denying all four requests from Anaheim Care LLC tonight; or at the very least require the applicant to provide reasonable RELOCATION FEES to the eight small locally owned businesses that the applicant wants to displace. It would be best if all the requests were denied because the entire project – carwash, 24-hour 7- eleven, and new gas station - are all things that the neighborhood unanimously DOES NOT NEED AND DOES NOT WANT. The traffic, already bad, will get much worse, no matter what the bought-and-paid-for “study” claims. The 24 hour store will be a burden on our already-burdened law enforcement. The carwash will either be a noise nuisance to the neighbors, or else force them to live behind a 12-food wall, both scenarios unacceptable. And it will displace eight longstanding beloved Anaheim businesses, all locally owned, seven of them immigrant-owned, and most of them will disappear (unless they receive sufficient relocation fees), causing more poverty and homelessness. It is especially cruel to do this to businesses who have barely managed to struggle and survive through the Year of Covid – none of them are able to finance a relocation on their own. You are appointed by a Council, and we’ll be telling them the same things – a Council that claims to be for Anaheim neighborhoods and small businesses should either deny this whole bad project, or AT LEAST make this speculator pay relocation fees. Possibility #3 – they should give the businesses another year or two to recover from Covid shutdowns so they can save up themselves for relocation. My arguments in more length are here, if you care. Maybe you should check it out, because hundreds and eventually thousands of Anaheim voters will be reading this in the coming weeks: http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2021/04/jagerhaus-moving-and-golcheh-should-have-to-pay-re- location-to-all-sunkist-plaza-businesses/ Thank you for your consideration Vern Nelson Sent from Mail for Windows 10 LATE CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Fwd: Planning Commission Date:Thursday, April 8, 2021 10:08:39 AM Date: Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Subject: Comments for April 12 Meeting, NE corner Ball Rd/Sunkist St Chairperson Keys and Commission members My name is Joseph Schenk, and I am a retired civil engineer with previous experience as a Public Works official. I have lived (for over 50 years) within half a mile of the proposed development; thus based on my work experience involving many developments (as well as my personal observations), I feel qualified to provide input relative to theappropriateness of the proposed development. I am restricting my comments to the traffic impacts associated with theproposed development. I attended the December 4, 2019 kickoff meetingat the Sunkist Library where the developer introduced the project to the neighborhood. I listened to the Planning Commission discuss the proposed development on January 20, 2021 as well, and I listened to the virtual Community Meeting conducted by the developer on February 13, 2021. As part of the Commission's voluminous agenda packet for the1/20/21 meeting, the developer provided a traffic impact analysis createdby their traffic engineer and this consultant also provided input at the2/13/2021 virtual neighborhood meeting. I have a number of concerns relating to on-site and off-site trafficmovements. The developer's traffic engineer indicated traffic counts obtained in 2019 were used to create the traffic impact report provided to the city. I would agree those counts are more realistic than any counts obtained in the first half of 2020 due to the COVID reduction of vehicular traffic, but what are the current counts compared to 2019? I don't thinkanyone would disagree that the Ball/Sunkist intersection is heavilytrafficked...even after the completion of the city improvements. The City of Anaheim controls the traffic signal at the Ball Rd./Sunkist St. intersection, and the timing has been programmed to control traffic flow and demands. A question I would ask is whether traffic on Ball Rd. in the development area operates in a coordinated mode. I rather doubt that it does, since CALTRANS controls signals at the Rt 57 Freeway off-ramps.And in my experience, the off-ramp controllers do not "talk to" the city'scontrollers. CALTRANS is very concerned that off-ramp traffic does NOTbackup so as to impact flow on the freeway lanes, so in heavy off-rampflows the off-ramp signal allows more vehicles onto Ball Rd. Why do I mention this? Between the southbound Rt 57 off-ramp and NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 approaching the Sunkist St intersection, Ball Rd (in the west bound direction) has 2 dedicated left turn lanes...3 thru lanes and a dedicatedright turn lane onto Sunkist St. The developer's traffic report indicates theoutbound car wash driveway would have a level of service (LOS) in thePM peak of "E". In the 2/13/21 virtual meeting, the developer's trafficengineer alluded to the fact that exiting car wash vehicles would havegaps in traffic flow on westbound Ball Rd allowing safe right turns fromthe development and even allowing access to the left turn lanes at the Ball/Sunkist signal. Does the Planning Commission want to approve this? Access to the development is proposed either from westbound Ball Rd. or northbound Sunkist St. Access for car wash patrons from westbound BallRd should not present an issue, however if a motorist enters the drivewayclosest to the car wash to go to the 7-11 and an on-site exiting queueexists, entrance to the development could be blocked impacting traffic inthe right turn lane on Ball Rd. Should the Ball Rd. driveways bedesignated separately for car wash and service station? Access to the carwash from the Sunkist St driveway will present an on-site circulation issue. There will be opportunity for motorist conflict between those wanting to access the car wash facility and the motorists utilizing the service station/store. Add a fuel delivery truck into the mix and there will be instant congestion (fuel deliveries are scheduled for daylight hours per the7-11 rep speaking at the 2/13/21 meeting). On-site parking requirements should be carefully evaluated. It would beimpractical to consider that the 3 or 4 parking spaces on the east end of the development (for car wash employees?) could be counted towards spaces required for the 7-11 facility. If approved, 2 parcels are to be created from 3 existing parcels. Is this for resale purposes? Conditions of approval should address this possibility. The bottom line, in my opinion, is while the code allows the uses beingproposed, the site does not lend itself to the uses proposed, and theissues can not be mitigated to provide a safe and economically viablebusiness opportunity that would be a credit to the City of Anaheim. Respectively submitted,Joseph Schenk PE From Marlene's Ipad From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Comments on Ball Rd./Sunkist Street DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Date:Thursday, April 8, 2021 10:54:04 AM TO: CHAIRMAN KEYS and COMMISSION MEMBERSPLANNING COMMISSION RE: DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY ON NORTHEAST CORNER OF BALL AND SUNKIST. I live at in Anaheim.....not close enough to be impacted daily by the proposed development, but close enough to be quite concerned for our community if this proposed project is approved. My main concern is that I feel the proposed development is not appropriate for this particular location, and it will potentially create more problems for the city. The intersection was recently ‘redone’, and traffic is still not ‘flowing’ adequately. Point #1. The 7-11 will be a magnet for at least 2 elementary schools and 1 junior high school (whose students will be patronizing the location both before and after school on on foot at peak traffic hours). Besides that, the nearby high school students will be driving to the location before and after school at peak traffic time. It is impossible to access this site from Ball Rd. by eastbound traffic....(you would have to make a left turn at the Ball Rd./Sunkist St. intersection onto Sunkist Street and then make an immediate right turn into the center and risk being rear-ended). It is now and still will be immensely difficult to access the site going southbound on Sunkist St. It will be necessary to make a left hand turn across 2 lanes of traffic.....very close to an intersection, where you also have to navigate cars turning left from eastbound Ball Rd., as well as cars making a right turn from westbound Ball Rd. And this above scenario does not even take into consideration the traffic problems that the nearby 57 freeway entrances/exits create at peak hours when children will be going to and being released from school. In the mornings cars line up on southbound Sunkist St. in order to make a left turn on Ball Rd. to access the freeway. Add to this mix a high school student who is waiting to make a left turn from southbound Sunkist into the center for his/her morning ‘fix’ at 7-11. This could potentially block/restrict access to the intersection turn lane for those cars that are lining up with the intention of making a left turn on Ball Rd. to access the freeway. It is somewhat of a safety issue even now at peak traffic times (when the center has far less traffic than will be the case with these businesses present), and the approval of this project will simply result in more serious safety issues for the city and the community. Do you honestly think that this challenging traffic pattern does not lend itself to a greater possibility of an accident???? NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 Point #2. I feel that the proposed businesses (especially the car wash) are not suitable for this particular location, which is in very close proximity to a housing tract. My husband and I sat in the Staples parking lot across from the Express Wash on Tustin Ave. (We parked right next to Staples and not close to Tustin Avenue.) We rolled down our window, and the noise from the vacuums was VERY LOUD!!!! Fortunately there are no homes near the Tustin location. I’m sorry, but no wall or amount of plexiglass is going to stop such noise in the homes directly behind this location. I feel very sorry for these homeowners Point #3. In addition to the above concerns, I can’t help but be perplexed in seeing a new gas station being constructed from the ground up, when our government is in the process of eliminating fossil fuels. Does this seem logical??? Just wondering????? Point #4. And speaking of ‘overkill’......I have just accessed the Planning Commission Meeting Agenda for March 29th, and I saw that a developer is proposing Express Car Wash north of Lincoln on the west side of State College. What is going on here????? How many is too many????? I know there are a lot of cars, but if these two car washes are approved, there will be at least 6 car washes within a mile radius of our home. Please tell me that car washes and 7-11’s are not going to become like the ‘Anaheim Apartment Craziness’!!!! It’s ironic, but just months ago we were talking about ‘Neighborhood Preservation’!!! I’m guessing that’s a ‘thing of the past’???? In closing, I’m asking every Planning Commissioner to do your job (before approving this project). Take into account the traffic that this development is projected to create, and go to this site and navigate entering/exiting this project from every direction. Please go at ‘peak’ traffic times, otherwise you will not begin to understand the problems that will be created by this scenario. And at the same time take into account the teenage drivers that will be frequenting this site before and after school at peak traffic hours. Then please drive into the tract of nice homes behind the proposed development site and ask yourself if you would buy one of the homes that share the wall with these businesses.....or better yet, how would you feel, and what would you do if you bought your home because of the nice quiet neighborhood location, and then this noisy business moved in? And lastly, ask yourself if it’s possible that this development (in this particular location) because of the uneasy access......just might create more problems for the city than it would be worth. Thank you for your consideration. Joyce M. Schenk From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Fwd: Planning Commission Date:Thursday, April 8, 2021 10:08:39 AM Date: Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Subject: Comments for April 12 Meeting, NE corner Ball Rd/Sunkist St Chairperson Keys and Commission members My name is Joseph Schenk, and I am a retired civil engineer with previous experience as a Public Works official. I have lived (for over 50 years) within half a mile of the proposed development; thus based on my work experience involving many developments (as well as my personal observations), I feel qualified to provide input relative to theappropriateness of the proposed development. I am restricting my comments to the traffic impacts associated with theproposed development. I attended the December 4, 2019 kickoff meetingat the Sunkist Library where the developer introduced the project to the neighborhood. I listened to the Planning Commission discuss the proposed development on January 20, 2021 as well, and I listened to the virtual Community Meeting conducted by the developer on February 13, 2021. As part of the Commission's voluminous agenda packet for the1/20/21 meeting, the developer provided a traffic impact analysis createdby their traffic engineer and this consultant also provided input at the2/13/2021 virtual neighborhood meeting. I have a number of concerns relating to on-site and off-site trafficmovements. The developer's traffic engineer indicated traffic counts obtained in 2019 were used to create the traffic impact report provided to the city. I would agree those counts are more realistic than any counts obtained in the first half of 2020 due to the COVID reduction of vehicular traffic, but what are the current counts compared to 2019? I don't thinkanyone would disagree that the Ball/Sunkist intersection is heavilytrafficked...even after the completion of the city improvements. The City of Anaheim controls the traffic signal at the Ball Rd./Sunkist St. intersection, and the timing has been programmed to control traffic flow and demands. A question I would ask is whether traffic on Ball Rd. in the development area operates in a coordinated mode. I rather doubt that it does, since CALTRANS controls signals at the Rt 57 Freeway off-ramps.And in my experience, the off-ramp controllers do not "talk to" the city'scontrollers. CALTRANS is very concerned that off-ramp traffic does NOTbackup so as to impact flow on the freeway lanes, so in heavy off-rampflows the off-ramp signal allows more vehicles onto Ball Rd. Why do I mention this? Between the southbound Rt 57 off-ramp and NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 approaching the Sunkist St intersection, Ball Rd (in the west bound direction) has 2 dedicated left turn lanes...3 thru lanes and a dedicatedright turn lane onto Sunkist St. The developer's traffic report indicates theoutbound car wash driveway would have a level of service (LOS) in thePM peak of "E". In the 2/13/21 virtual meeting, the developer's trafficengineer alluded to the fact that exiting car wash vehicles would havegaps in traffic flow on westbound Ball Rd allowing safe right turns fromthe development and even allowing access to the left turn lanes at the Ball/Sunkist signal. Does the Planning Commission want to approve this? Access to the development is proposed either from westbound Ball Rd. or northbound Sunkist St. Access for car wash patrons from westbound BallRd should not present an issue, however if a motorist enters the drivewayclosest to the car wash to go to the 7-11 and an on-site exiting queueexists, entrance to the development could be blocked impacting traffic inthe right turn lane on Ball Rd. Should the Ball Rd. driveways bedesignated separately for car wash and service station? Access to the carwash from the Sunkist St driveway will present an on-site circulation issue. There will be opportunity for motorist conflict between those wanting to access the car wash facility and the motorists utilizing the service station/store. Add a fuel delivery truck into the mix and there will be instant congestion (fuel deliveries are scheduled for daylight hours per the7-11 rep speaking at the 2/13/21 meeting). On-site parking requirements should be carefully evaluated. It would beimpractical to consider that the 3 or 4 parking spaces on the east end of the development (for car wash employees?) could be counted towards spaces required for the 7-11 facility. If approved, 2 parcels are to be created from 3 existing parcels. Is this for resale purposes? Conditions of approval should address this possibility. The bottom line, in my opinion, is while the code allows the uses beingproposed, the site does not lend itself to the uses proposed, and theissues can not be mitigated to provide a safe and economically viablebusiness opportunity that would be a credit to the City of Anaheim. Respectively submitted,Joseph Schenk PE From Marlene's Ipad From: To:Planning Commission Subject:Comments on Ball Rd./Sunkist Street DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Date:Thursday, April 8, 2021 10:54:04 AM TO: CHAIRMAN KEYS and COMMISSION MEMBERSPLANNING COMMISSION RE: DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY ON NORTHEAST CORNER OF BALL AND SUNKIST. I live at in Anaheim.....not close enough to be impacted daily by the proposed development, but close enough to be quite concerned for our community if this proposed project is approved. My main concern is that I feel the proposed development is not appropriate for this particular location, and it will potentially create more problems for the city. The intersection was recently ‘redone’, and traffic is still not ‘flowing’ adequately. Point #1. The 7-11 will be a magnet for at least 2 elementary schools and 1 junior high school (whose students will be patronizing the location both before and after school on on foot at peak traffic hours). Besides that, the nearby high school students will be driving to the location before and after school at peak traffic time. It is impossible to access this site from Ball Rd. by eastbound traffic....(you would have to make a left turn at the Ball Rd./Sunkist St. intersection onto Sunkist Street and then make an immediate right turn into the center and risk being rear-ended). It is now and still will be immensely difficult to access the site going southbound on Sunkist St. It will be necessary to make a left hand turn across 2 lanes of traffic.....very close to an intersection, where you also have to navigate cars turning left from eastbound Ball Rd., as well as cars making a right turn from westbound Ball Rd. And this above scenario does not even take into consideration the traffic problems that the nearby 57 freeway entrances/exits create at peak hours when children will be going to and being released from school. In the mornings cars line up on southbound Sunkist St. in order to make a left turn on Ball Rd. to access the freeway. Add to this mix a high school student who is waiting to make a left turn from southbound Sunkist into the center for his/her morning ‘fix’ at 7-11. This could potentially block/restrict access to the intersection turn lane for those cars that are lining up with the intention of making a left turn on Ball Rd. to access the freeway. It is somewhat of a safety issue even now at peak traffic times (when the center has far less traffic than will be the case with these businesses present), and the approval of this project will simply result in more serious safety issues for the city and the community. Do you honestly think that this challenging traffic pattern does not lend itself to a greater possibility of an accident???? NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 Point #2. I feel that the proposed businesses (especially the car wash) are not suitable for this particular location, which is in very close proximity to a housing tract. My husband and I sat in the Staples parking lot across from the Express Wash on Tustin Ave. (We parked right next to Staples and not close to Tustin Avenue.) We rolled down our window, and the noise from the vacuums was VERY LOUD!!!! Fortunately there are no homes near the Tustin location. I’m sorry, but no wall or amount of plexiglass is going to stop such noise in the homes directly behind this location. I feel very sorry for these homeowners Point #3. In addition to the above concerns, I can’t help but be perplexed in seeing a new gas station being constructed from the ground up, when our government is in the process of eliminating fossil fuels. Does this seem logical??? Just wondering????? Point #4. And speaking of ‘overkill’......I have just accessed the Planning Commission Meeting Agenda for March 29th, and I saw that a developer is proposing Express Car Wash north of Lincoln on the west side of State College. What is going on here????? How many is too many????? I know there are a lot of cars, but if these two car washes are approved, there will be at least 6 car washes within a mile radius of our home. Please tell me that car washes and 7-11’s are not going to become like the ‘Anaheim Apartment Craziness’!!!! It’s ironic, but just months ago we were talking about ‘Neighborhood Preservation’!!! I’m guessing that’s a ‘thing of the past’???? In closing, I’m asking every Planning Commissioner to do your job (before approving this project). Take into account the traffic that this development is projected to create, and go to this site and navigate entering/exiting this project from every direction. Please go at ‘peak’ traffic times, otherwise you will not begin to understand the problems that will be created by this scenario. And at the same time take into account the teenage drivers that will be frequenting this site before and after school at peak traffic hours. Then please drive into the tract of nice homes behind the proposed development site and ask yourself if you would buy one of the homes that share the wall with these businesses.....or better yet, how would you feel, and what would you do if you bought your home because of the nice quiet neighborhood location, and then this noisy business moved in? And lastly, ask yourself if it’s possible that this development (in this particular location) because of the uneasy access......just might create more problems for the city than it would be worth. Thank you for your consideration. Joyce M. Schenk From:Amanda Wortman To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Re: site on Sunkist and Ball Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 1:33:18 PM Hello, The last time I wrote the planning commission about this issue (in September), I was merely a local of Orange County, lived in Orange near the Anaheim border and had been visiting Jagerhaus for almost 40 years of my life. Now I am writing as a resident of the neighborhood, after moving near State College and Ball in January. I don't know if this is a done deal, but I am again writing to the planning commission to voice my support for saving the Jagerhaus instead of building another car wash in Anaheim. Jagerhaus is a community institution, a place for locals and travelers alike to gather, and is important to maintain as a historical site. Anaheim was founded as a German village and to even consider replacing the Jagerhaus with a carwash is unfathomable. Anaheim needs more community gathering places, not less. Not only is Jagerhaus an important location in that property, but so are the other businesses, like His Nibs and Melchor Bakery. These businesses are small, immigrant owned and important to the community. To relocate them would cause irreparable damage to these small businesses and they would need to be compensated significantly to even consider this request. Again, the site plan of a car wash, gas station and a 7-11 is terrible and I wouldn't visit any of them. There are many gas stations in 92805, and even one across the street! A 24 hour 7-11 would bring in a criminal element when the area is already dealing with an increase in homelessness and mental illness. And I have never lived anywhere with so many car washes as Anaheim! I really ask the planning commission to reconsider this change to the property on Sunkist and Ball. Thank you for your time, Amanda Wortman Anaheim, CA 92805 NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:RE Planning Commission Public Hearing - April 12, 2021 (Sunkist/Ball 7-11 and Rapids Express Carwash) Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 10:31:54 AM Attachments:my-email-signature-business.jpg Dear Mr Carvalho, The developers that want to put this monstrosity into this location had promised funds for the businesses to relocate. They have reneged on this, offering nothing at all to these small Anaheim-family-owned businesses that are being forced out. Most of these businesses won’t be able to relocate without help. If the variances are granted, please stipulate that the developers make good on their offer to take care of the tenants, all of the tenants. Thank you Kay Jones On Mar 31, 2021, at 2:30 PM, Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> wrote: Interested Parties- Attached is a copy of a Notice of Public Hearing for the April 12, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. The application for the 7-11 convenience store/gas station and Rapids Express carwash that was continued from the January 20, 2021 meeting is on the agenda. Regards, Wayne Carvalho I Contract Planner City of Anaheim Department of Planning & Building 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 Anaheim CA 92805 (714) 765-4949 <Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing on April 12, 2021.pdf> From: To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Re: Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing - April 12, 2021 (Sunkist/Ball 7-11 and Rapids Express Carwash) Date:Saturday, April 10, 2021 12:40:00 PM Hi Wayne, Thank you for the notice. I live adjacent to the development and ask that if the project gets approved, the new wall be built prior to demolition. The demo and construction will likely create a lot of noise and I was told it would take over a year to complete. That's a long time and any methods to further mitigate noise and other disturbances would be appreciated. Thanks, Mary On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, 2:30 PM Wayne Carvalho <WCarvalho@anaheim.net> wrote: Interested Parties- Attached is a copy of a Notice of Public Hearing for the April 12, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. The application for the 7-11 convenience store/gas station and Rapids Express carwash that was continued from the January 20, 2021 meeting is on the agenda. Regards, Wayne Carvalho I Contract Planner City of Anaheim Department of Planning & Building 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor Anaheim CA 92805 (714) 765-4949 NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From:Ryan Sparks To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Ball & Sunkist Feedback Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 1:05:12 PM Hi Wayne, I hope this email finds you well. I am an Anaheim resident and wanted to share feedback on the proposed 7-11 / carwash project at the corner of Ball Rd. and Sunkist St. While I am happy to see new development in our city, it’s disheartening that so many new projects are carwash facilities. I live near Downtown Anaheim and have seen two carwash locations open this past year: Fast 5 Xpress - State College Blvd. & Santa Ana St. Anaheim Express Wash - Lincoln Ave. & Euclid St. I understand the business rationale to create such a facility. However, from a community perspective, it feels like a disservice to residents to allow our city to be flooded with (even more) carwash sites. Hopefully this location can instead be developed into something unique that adds value to our community. Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Ryan Sparks NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From:Ryan Tickle To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:Jagerhaus Restaurant in Anaheim Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 12:13:21 PM Greetings Wayne, I just wanted to send you a short note about the disappointing plans for the property where the Jagerhaus Restaurant sits. The L.A. metroplex, as you are aware, loses cultural gathering places every day to culturally-valueless things like 7-11s and car washes. The Jagerhaus is one of those places where people learn about another culture and celebrate it through language and cuisine. Money always seems to win in the end, but it's a sad commentary on our society's values. Best, Ryan Tickle NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From: To:Wayne Carvalho Cc: Subject:RE: Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing - April 12, 2021 (Sunkist/Ball 7-11 and Rapids Express Carwash) Date:Friday, April 9, 2021 12:02:06 PM 1.86 acre property 2501-2525 E. Ball Road. Comment My name is Steve Halbert. The above property is right behind my house. I reject the building of the car wash on Ball Rd. It will be noisy no matter how hard they work to reduce the noise level. The state requirements are not 0 I know this. I ‘am more so opposed to a rezoning of the property to build residential apartments on that land. I would much prefer the 7-11 gas station project over a transit community of apartments. Recapping. First choice is keeping the existing center with a facelift and adding some improved tenants. Second choice is the project being reviewed. Third choice is apartments. We already have apartments to the west and they park all over our street. Usually we can’t park in front of our own homes. Forget any idea of building apartments on the property. Steve Halbert (City of Anaheim , Water Production Technician Supervisor, retired after 35 years in Anaheim P/U) Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Wayne Carvalho Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 2:30 PM To: Wayne Carvalho Subject: Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing - April 12, 2021 (Sunkist/Ball 7-11 and Rapids Express Carwash) Interested Parties- Attached is a copy of a Notice of Public Hearing for the April 12, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. The application for the 7-11 convenience store/gas station and Rapids Express carwash that was continued from the January 20, 2021 meeting is on the agenda. Regards, Wayne Carvalho I Contract Planner City of Anaheim Department of Planning & Building 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor Anaheim CA 92805 (714) 765-4949 NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 From:Martin McIntosh To:Wayne Carvalho Subject:2501-2525 East Ball Road Project Date:Monday, April 12, 2021 2:28:47 PM I am writing today regarding the 2501-2525 East Ball Road Project. This project will introduce a significant amount of water to the property and we need to be sure that the project will not damage the water table and destroy the percolation beds in the Santa Ana River. This project will also bring major changes to traffic and noise to the area that needs to be studied. The proposed project is a major change to the property, I don’t feel that it would be proper to grant this project an Infill Exemption nor would a NegDec be sufficient. I would like to ask that City require a full EIR for the project. Sincerely, Martin McIntosh Resident - District 5 NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3