Loading...
1976/01/2076-3~ City l!all, Anaheim; California - COU~,~CIL ~I,R,%F,q - J~nuarv 20, ]nT&, I:~Q ''" The City Council of the City of Anabeip met in regular session. P~ESC7'~T: COUIICIL I'.~ZMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom ABS£qT: COU!~CIL ~MBERS: Sneegas PRESEt:T: ASSISTANT CITY ~.'~ANAGER: !,Til]iam O. Talley ASSISTANT CITY ;,%TORNEY: William I~opkins DEPUTY CITY ATTO~$EY: Frank ~. Lo~y, Jr. DEPUTY CITY CLEPdP: Linde D. Roberts ST~IU>;-CONVE.~TION CE~-ITE%-COLF OIRECTOR: T. F. Lte~ler PL~iNI~IG DIRECTOR: Ponald Thompson ZO~'~II~G SUPERVI:~;OR: Annika Santalaht~ CITY E~'~GI~IEER: 3a~es P. ~{addox :.{ayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting· I~'IVOCATIOY.,~: ]leverend Gordon $1oan of the Yelodvland ]!otline Center ?ave the Invocat ion. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Calvin L. Peb]ey led the ~.sser,~bly in the ?lec~ge of AlleFiance to the Flag. I>ITRODUCIIO.~.I Ai.:.D PRLSE'!TFATION~ I~ISS A~NAHEIM .~976: Yran Mauck of the Yo~en's Division, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, introduced %-'iss CF~ristine Eriel, >~iss Anahei~ I976. Mayor Thom presented ~iss };riel with roses, an attache case and a 7~t? "A" symbol on behalf of the City Council and invited her to address the meeting. Miss Briel thanked the Council and summarized the ~oals she has set for herself as Miss Anaheim. RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: ; Resolution of Congratulations for ~"r. ~,ichard ~7. Gay on the occasion of his retirement after 46 years and 1~ months at the Bank of ;.merica, .Anaheim l~ain Office, was unanimously autborized by the Council. RESOLUTIOi'~ OF COMDOLEMCE: ~ Resolutior of Condolence for the family of Peece F. Hall, Senior Accountant at the Anaheim Stadium and Convention Center, was unanimously authorized .by the City Coupcil. ~.~I]iUTES. Yinutes of the Anaheim City Council Pe?ular Ueettn? held ?)ecer~.er ? · , 1~75, were approved subject to typographical corrections and the following amendment to the ."~inutes of ?:ovember 4, ]975 was authorized, on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour: ". ,.a charge of ~.PA per barrel and providin~ for an audit to substantiate the cost increase (~.q;~ per · . ~,A,~RI . barrel) by January 31, 1976" Councilman Sneegas absent >~OTION C P ~. WAIVER ,DF READING - ORDI~t~'tCES .~ND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Ka~vwood moved to waive the readin8 in full of all ordinances and resolution, s, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council ~.~embers unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made %y a Council ..'..'er-Set ~_or the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. Councilman Sneegas absent. ~.TIO~ ~qLA~,.:IT.~OUSLY CARRI?,D. REPORT - FIP.;~f.:CIAL DE}iANDS AGAI~:~ST THE CITY: Demands agaipst the City ~.n the amount of $756,865.76, in accordance with the 1975-76 Budget, were approved. PRELIMIT.~AP.Y ANALYSIS - CONCESSIONAIRES - ANAHEIM STADIbT{: Pursuant to the adjourned regular meetin~ held January 15, 1976, at which the five potential concessionaires presented proposals, ~Ir. Talley submitted a preliminary analysis prepared by members of the City '~!anager's Office, together with 7~.'~r. Liecler, of the three types of fee arranFements which were presap, ted that date. This analysi~ give the advantages and disadvantages of each, co~pared under a model pro forma using information supplied by the concessionaires to establish the City's re~urn at various income levels. In sum~,ary staff bas concluded that there are two concession~ires which merit further consideration, Interstate United Volume Services, Inc., and Szabo Foods, Inc., and the~v could not satisfy themselves that either offer from these two firms was of moro 7 F~- n q C~ity HallI Anaheim! California - COU';CIL Y.I~.~UTt].S - January 29! 1076.1 l:2q ~.',. benefit to the City. Staff recommended they be permitted an opportunity to ne~'otiate with these two concessionaires and return in approx~r~ately four w~eks with one reco~nendation for the Council. Councilman Pebley moved that the City staff be instructed to continue negotiations with Interstate United 'Volume Cervices, Inc., and Szabo Foodm, Inc., with regard to the contract for Anaheim Stadium concessions. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. Councilman ~nee?as absent. CARRIT~D. ~fr. Talley submitted a report dated January 20, leTg, describing the status o~ implementation of Arthur Young ~ Company recom~mendations in various City ?)epartnents for Council information. }~r. Talley reported that they intend to sukr~it these reports on a periodic basis to keep ~iouncil aware of the steps ~in~ taken towar~ these goals. During the B~d,~et ~a]~in~ process, the Arthur Young & Company recommendations will be discussed with each Department ~lead as to whether or not full implementation has beep achievect. If not, as part of the Wana~ement by Objectives Program for the fo]lowin? fiscal year, methods to achieve the further recomr~endations wJ]] be presented, or a suF. sequent report will be provided on any recommendation which a Department ]lead feels stronFly should not be implemented. action was taken by the City Council. ~.O.~%.TIQ,~.. Dt'~ .S3 129.4.: Mr. Talley reported, that the Le?islative ilul]etin in.~.icates the Senate Committee on Governmental Or?anization on January 13, 1~76 has passed CB 129A, which relates to compulsory and bindinK arbitration for puklic safety personnel. Ile advised that the League of California Cities ]:as ur?ed that all cities stress opposition to this proposed bill inasmuch as it would take from the city councils their prerogative to set salaries and bud?ets, thereby turning them over to arbitration. On motion by Councilwoman 'Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seyp~our, thc City Council authorized letters be prepared for the ~ayor's sifnature to be forwarded to the State Senators indicating the Anahei~ City Council's position of opposition to ~B 1294. Councilman ~neecas absent. ~OTI07~ CJRRILF~. RESOLUTIOll NO. 76R-o4 - A~lPIDY. E-~T TO a~pr£.,~m~,~ ... ~. ....... _ ................... ~. ..... ..~..~ ~ $OUTI~ER:.~ ¢:ALIFOR~:IA EDISO:~. (For ,, park purposes, north side of Freed..v, an :.Tay, east of Fotel t~ay.) Counc~l:~an S~ymour offered Resolution ~:o. ?6P-2Z~ for adoption, with amendment to line ?.5 to reflect the date of February ?~, 1979. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTI~'~ CITY OF ~oll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL ~BERS: Kaywood, ~eymour, Pebley and Tl~or? UOES: COL2.ICIL ~.~MBERS: Sneegas Aoo,..~i: CO~CIL }%i~ERS: ::one , T';te Mayor declared Resolution '~o. 76P,-2&. duly passed an(] adopted. PROPOSED CiiA~]GES TO CIIAPTER 1.04 OF ~.'.:E A:~AiIEI}: ?,~?~ICIPAL CODE: ~'r. Lowry reported on various changes proposed to the ;.nalteir '~:unicipal Code as summarized in his memorandum dated January !2, 1076 which were requeste,:~ by the City Manager's Office and City Council. For convenience these cban?es have been incorporated into one ordinance, ti~ reviewe~l the than?es propose~{ which include: 1) renamin~ of Development Cervices Department to Planning Depart- ment and Redevelopment Department to Community D~velopr~ent qepart.~ent; 2) removal of Data Processing frm.~ the Finance Director's nffice an,:] placmpent under the City Manager; 3) removal of Flectrtcal Inspectors from ~tility Director's Office and placement in the F, uildin? '~ivision; 4) authorization for Data ?rocessin~ '-IanaF~er to obligate the City for softwar~ not to 5) authOrization for all commissions formed by Charter or ordinance to receive 76-40 C_ity_!lall; Anaheim; ..California- COIP'~CIL MINUTES -January 20, 1976~ 1:30 P.?% $25 expense allowance; .','5) the design~ation of the Plsnnin~ Director as Chief Building Inspector of the City. :{r. Lowry reported that since the time of preparation of the ordinance the Assistant City Manager has requested Item .~os. 4 and 6 above be deleted from this ordinance and considered separately at a later date. In addition, the Co!f Course Advisory Commission which was established by resolution requires a resolution for enactment of the expense allowance, which has been prepared anJ also subr:itted at this time. Council discussion ensued re~ardinF the proposed expense allowances, comments in the news media, and comments by some commissioners that they woul~I prefer no~ to receive any stipend or honorarium. Councilwoman l.iaywood suF.~ested it r~ight be better to give recognition to those servinF, on com- missions in some other way. Councilman Seymour stated that although he was originally in favor of providing these small allowances,~ which in no way measure up to the value of the time contributed by the commissioners, on second thought it m. igt~t appear to be inconsistent with the emphasis on economy and cuttin~ back which has been stressed to the City Department Heads. tle therefore voiced the opinion that the expense reimbursement situation should remain as it is. ..qayor Thom stated that he feels awarding, the expense allowance to the City Flanning Commission and Community Development Com~..ission only is discriminatory and arbitrary and that if the other commissions are not to receive any stipend then it should be eliminated from these t~o boards as well. Additional Council discussion was held durinc which Council 7. fembers Seymour and Xaywood voiced the opinion that they felt the stipend for the two- commissions as presently constituted is justified because these are the two commissions who devote an extraordinary amount of time to carry out their responsibility, much the same as the City Council }~.embers must devote. Councilman Seymour remarked that the City is fortunate in that there are so many dedicated citizens of considerable talent and caliber who consider it a privilege ~o serve on the various boards and commissions. Consequently he voiced the opinion that some form of reco.m.~ition for their service would be more appropriate. Councilman Seymour indicated however he would agree to deleting these allowances for the Planning and Community Redevelopment Commissions if the expense allowance for Council ~fembers were also deleted, which would have to be accomplished by amending the City Charter. At the conclusion, of discussion, Councilman Pebley moved that the expense allowance for the Planning an.-~. Community Redevelopment Commission remain as currently established; and further that the revision to Section 1..0Z~.345 be deleted from this proposed ordinance thereby tabling the subject of authorization for reimbursement of all other boards and commissions. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. Councilman Thom voted "no", Councilman Sneegas absent. MOTION CARRIED. OPYDINAilCE ,.'~O. 3497; Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance Uo. 3&97 for first reading, as amended. :~? ',qRDIIliANCE OF ~.{E CITY COUNCIL OF TUE CITY OF A:~AIIEI?~. r!EPEALI~':G SECTIONS 1.04.110; 1.04.130; 1.04.160; 1.04.190; 1.OZl..20O; 1.04.2A0; 1.0~.3]..~; 1.OZ~.56q Al-ID ADDING NEq~7 SECTIONS 1.04.110; 1.04.130; 1.04.160; 1.0&,lq0; 1.04.310; 1.0&-.345 A~ID 1.04.560 IN ?.]'iEIR PLACE PERTAI:,;I:..IC TO CITY'S OFFICERS ~%7D DEPARTmeNTS. REQUEST - PE?CIISSION TO SELL BEER - INTE?i.~ATION;]~ RUGBY ?'~.TCII: Request of Mr. Larry Sierk on behai'f of the An~J~eim Chamber of Co~erce for 'permission to sell beer at Glover Stadium and in the La Palma Recreation Center durin~ the Intez~ational Eugby ~.~atch, January 31, 1976, was submitted for Council con- sideration. ~',!r. tIopkins advised that Chapter 7.16.050 of the Anaheim Municipal Code makes it unlawful to consume intoxicating beverase on any public street, park, alley, etc., and technically the Council cannot waive the provisions of an ordinance. 76-41 c_ity._.Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUI,;CIL ~.~I:~UTES - January ................... , ~.{ayor Thom directed, with concurrence of the other Council ~'embers, that a letter be forwarded to Mr. Sierk advising him that the Council is not empowered to waive Chapter 7.16.05~ of the Anaheim :,{unicipal Code ~nd therefore the request must be denied. JOI.~,:T ,fEETING - LIB~RAKY BOARD: Request of Mr. l,:illia.~ Griffit!~, on be}~alf of ti~e Library Board, for a J~int meeting with the ;:naheir.~ City Council on Friday, February 6, 1976, was submitted. The Council 7,{embers indicated they would be able to meet with t}te Librarv ~oard on Wednesday, February 4, 1976 at 3:00 P.:.~. GRi]Ei*U-3ELT IMPL~'IENTATION PL~d'~, PHASE II: Phase II of the Santa Ama P. iver/Santiago Creek Greenbelt Implementation Plan, identification of recreationally oriented facilities and ope]~, space areas, was submitted to~'ether with recommendation from the Planning Department that the City Council approve said plan in accordance with the recom~.endation of the ~a~ta Ana Kiver/Saptia?o Creek Greenbelt Commission. (The plan itself was posted in the Council Chamber. ) Mr. Thompson reported that this plan was prepared under the direction of the Anaheim Citizens Greenbelt Committee. ~e advised that another plan indicating ownership, estimated development costs and responsibilities for operation and maintenance would be forthcoming during the month, of February. ~,~r. Donald Fears, representing the Anaheim Citizens Greenbelt Committee, advised that they are in concurrence with the recomr,:~endation for approval of the Phase II Implementation Plan. On motion by Councilwoman ~iaywood, seconded by Councilman. Seymour, the City Council approved Phase II of the Implementation Plan in accordance with the recommendation of the Santa Ana River/Santiago Creek Greenbelt Commission. Councilman Sneegas absent· MOTION CARRIED. D~,_IG,.~A~IO~.., - tiEALTH SYSTEMS PLA~N'~.ING AGEI~CY FOR OR~C,.~G~o CO~',TTY ?.tr. Pobert Thomas, Orange County Administrative Officer, gave a detailed presentation regarding their application for designation as the Health System, s Planning. Agency for Orange County~ citing as reasons for their designation, that it is a function of government to plan and provide health services; that they already have the capabilities to provide the data processing and plannin? necessary; and that they are accountable directly to the public. At the conclusion of his presentation, ~..'r. Tho,.as sub'mitted a copy of the County's application for designation as the Orange County :~-iealth Systems ~]an- ning Agency, dated January 7, 1976 (on file in the ~,ffice of the City Clef!). !3uring the question and answer period, in response to the City Council, ?.Ir. Thomas explained that their agency would provide for extra resources a~,d contributions to the program in the form of ~P..6,DO0 worth of in-kind support directly to this effort, plus the number of staff hours involved; that theJ.r plan would provide for 20 city councilmen to be represented on sub-area advisory councils; and that a budget is proposed within the application which illustrates the cost of the operation. In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, ?.{r. Thomas replied that he felt there was an advantage to Joint applieation for this designation together with the Orange County Iiealth Planning Council, as this would retain those experienced individuals who have been workinF with the Council in the program., but that he did not foresee any possibility that this would happen. '~:r. Bill Daly and Mr. Stan ?~atek, representing the C~ran?e County i:ealth Planning Council, presented additional informational m. aterials, inc!udinc pews- paper articles and letters of endorsement, in support of their desir, nation as the ilealth Systems Planning Agency. It was reiterated that they l~ave received endorsement from 92 public and private agencies. In response to Mayor Thom, Mr. Matek advised that the U. ealth }~]anninE Council has received funds from the ilospital Council of fouthern California for the past two years and a prorata share from the ~i'ational Council for health insurance corporations which allocates funds to all health planning a~encies in 76-4 2 City t[all, Anaheim, California- COU~:CIL ~,fI>~3TES - ,I,,aDuqry 2n 1976 1:3~ ~" _ .... ,, , . , ~; ~, ~ -' · · the United States· Previously they have received funding from the County Fovernment as well, but this has been discontinued. At the conclusion of discussion, Yayor Thom advised that the Council not prepared to consider endorsement of the County of OranF~e or affirmation of ~hcir previous endorsement of the ]i~ealth Planning Council. this date, but would take the materials and presentation under advisement and decision would be reached after perusal of same· }~r. ~..'atek advised that he would fo~-,~ard complete applications for the ~]esi~ation prepared by the Health Planning Council. !',,?o further action was taken by the City Council at this time. .. .... =,oS: By general consent, the City Council recessed for ten minutes. (2:55 ~,F~R RECESS: Yayor Thom called the meeting to order, all l','~embers of the City Council being present with the exception of Council ~embers Pebley and £neeras. (3:05 C:'.]~';TINUED PUBLIC i~ARING - CONDITIONAL USE P~.m~.IT ,~O. 15o2 (E.I T', '~;0- 152): ?,pplication of Texaco-Anaheim ltills~ Inc., for Conditional Use Permit Uo. ]562 to const~ct a public equestrian center on P.S-.A-43,000 (SC) zoned property at the southerly co~er of Serrano Avenue and Hidden Canyon Voad, together with '"'.I.2. }~o. 152, was continued to the meeting, of February 3, 1976, at the request of the applicants, on motion by Councilwoman ::aywood, seconded by Councilman ge~our. Council ?.~emhers Pebley and gu,etas absent CARRIEI). Councilman Pebley returned to the Council C::~amber. (3:07 ~UBLIC ilEARI,'..iG - ~rr"CLASSIFICATIO>i' ~..,O 75-76-15 )i~D .... AP. I32.,CI.., ~TO 27.57 Application of John P. and ~-~aureen 5~. Younkin for a change in zone fro~ ~S-/.- 43,000 (0) to .°.2~-1200 (0) and the follow'in,.-. Code waivers to construct a ]]2- unit apartment complex on the south side of Frontera Street~ east of Par],: Vista Street, was submitted together with application for negative declaration status from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report.; a. ~faximum building height. b. ~.'?inimu. m floor area. c. Required site screening. (iTithdrm~n~.) The City .Planning Commission, pursuant to ~.esolution ?:~o. PC75-265, reco~- ~.ended that subject project be declared exempt fro~., the required, cut to prepare an environmental impact report and further approves Reclassification ~':o. 75-76-15, subject to the followin~ conditions: 1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 51 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Front,re Street for street widening purposes· 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Front,re Street, including preparation of improvement plans and 'h~stallation of all improver~ents such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street ~radinc and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work, shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that street liFhtinc facilities along Frontera Street and Jackson Avenue shall be installed as r~quired by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and for~ satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the C.~ty to guarantee the install_etlon of the above-mentioned requirements. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of the sum of 60¢ per front foot alo~.g Frontera Street and J~ckson Avenue for tree planting purposes. 4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public 17orks. 7 (:,-z, ~ City ,~all~ ~ms]~eim~ CalifQrnia - COUNCIL ~,:I:~TES - Januar7 20t 1976t 1:30 ]'.',~. 5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to cormence~,~ent of structural framing.:. 6. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded fro~.~ view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. 7. That subject property shall be served by underf,.round utilities. q. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 9. In the event that subject property is to he divided for the purpose of sale, lease or financing, a parcel map to record the approved division of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City of ,~:naheir~ and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 10. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anahef. m the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees, as ~etermined to be appro- :~riate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the buildin~ per- ~"~.:it is issued. 11. That appropriate water assessn~ent fees, as determined by the T':.irector of ~ub!ic Utilities, shall be paid to the City of ~'.paheim prior to the issuance of a building permit. 12. That the owner(s) of subject property s?~all pay to the City of Anaheim a proportionate share of the expense previous].y incurred by the City of Anahei?~. for the acquisition of right-of-way and street improve~.ents in connection with the improvements to Jackson Avenue, said proportionate share beinR 24.357'~ of the total costs and amountin~ to , . ~C3 331 0,'.3 for right-of-way acquisition and ~3,947.97 for the street improve~.'.~ents, or a total of ~7,279.~5 as the propor- tionate share, as stipulated to by the petitioner, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay drainaFe rein~burse::'ent fees of $~44.35 per acre to the City of Dmaheim prior to approval of a ~radin? plan or, in the event no gradinf~ plan is required, prior to issuance of a buildinf~ permit. 14. t~rior to the introduction of an ordinance rezonJ, n~ subject property Condition l~os. 1, 2, 3, and 9, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provi- sions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council r~ay ~rant. 15. That Condition Uos. 4, 6, 7, and 8, above-mentioned, shall be cor~?lied with prior to final building and zoning,'~ inspections. ?he City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution '!,?o. PC75-296, ~rantea Variance I~o. 2757 in part, waiver "c" havin[~ been ~,~ithdrawn for a total number of 1O°o units, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this Variance is granted subject to the co~_pletion of :Z. eclassification ]~o. 75-76-15, now pending. 2. That this Variance is granted subject to the termination of Conditional Use Permit ~:~o. 1125 on the subject property. 3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accorc!ance with plans and speclfica~ions on file with the City of £maheir:~ marked E~ibit :7os. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; provided, ho~ever, that this Variance is granted for a lOS-unit apartment complex; that site screening shall be provided on the southerly portion o~ the subject property in conformance with Code require- ments, as stipulated to by the petitioner; t. hat four dwellin~ units shall be deleted from. the proposed development and replaced by additional par~cing spaces, as stipulated to by the petitioner; and that the easterly drive cut on the southerly portion of subject property shall be aligned with the central drive cut on the north side of Jackson Street, subject to the approval of the City Traffic l:ngineer, as stipulated to by the petitioner. :.'~iss Santalahti briefed the surrounding land uses and zoning and the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Co.?m~ssion. She advised that at the Planning Commission level the petitioner stipulated to removal of four dwelling units to provide additional parkin~ spaces on the northerly portion of the property and consequently the t~lannin~ Commission approval was for 108 units. 7:~e ~'~'~ayor asked if the applicant or his a?ent was present and satisfied ~.,zith uhe recommendations of the City PlannipF Co~,~mission. 7~-A4 City iiall~.. Anahe. im~ California - C, OU'.,~CIL >.~I,"IUTES -January '20~ .1.976~ 1 ?4r. David Stone of IPS, 10~5.. Yorth ~l..'ain Str~,et, Suite 7o. D, Orance, /;'enl'_ for the Applicant, advised they were in full concurrence with the City ?laDnJnF Co~..n~ission recommendations and conditions. The ~layor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either ~n favor or in opposition; there being no response, he declared t!~e l~earing closed. Councilwoman i,laywood questioned whether the rer,~oval of the four units as stipulated to and installation of parking on the nortl~erly portion eliminates the need to cross the street for parkir, g at this project, to which ~iss Santal~9/~ti replied that the Code requirer~ent is that the enclosed spaces be within 200 feet and this project already meets that requirement without additional parking spaces. ,.)~-%~.AL T~m^,~.~ REPORT - ]'~EGATIVE Se~our, seconded by Councilman t'ebley, the City Council finds that this project will have no si~ificant ~effect on the environnent and. is, therefore, ~_~empt from the requirement to prepare an eDviron?~ental impact report. Councilman Sneegas absent. ~-DTIO!.~ CARP. lED. '":UJSOLUTIO3: :,?O. 76~1-25: Councilman geymour offered '~esolut~on ~:'c. 76P-25 for adoption, authorizing the preparstion of the necessary ordinance,.c!,,angin.,~.the zone as requested, subject to the conditions recomP, ended by the City FlannJ.nf: C ommi s s i on.. ':lefer to i:esolution 7took. '~ :':'2SOLUTIO"i OF ~tE CITY ~,. '711AT TITLE 18 OF '!lIE A~l~a:,I,:-:~ ,"~,~ICIP)2, C~'T T ~ ...... T~ .... ~,~.,_ Oi,,.,~ OULO T~E. ,..'T'~"~C.I~D, ,., · (75-76-1 .~,-1.~oo (o)) ~o].1 Call Vote: :',YES: COUi~CIL iqZMBEtlS: ![aywood, 5eSq'~.our, Pebley and Thom ':~OES: COU>;CIL ~.rLAB~..R~: The ?fayor declared 2esolution ~;o. 76~.-25 duly passod and adopted. ., :,SOLUTIO.':; v ,: ..... '~ ) 76R-26 Councilnan Seymour offered Reso].ution 77o. 76,.,.,-26 for adoption, granting Variance l;o. 2757 subject to the conditions reconmended by the City Planning (',or, mission. Refer to Resolution Aook. :':oll ~ ~,all Vote; AYES; COUNCIL ~,,~:~BI',R~ Kaywood, Seymour, ~'' ' S: Pebley and Tho~ 7.:0i:~, COU:~'CIL ~ ' '" ABSEL:T COU,.~IL ~.I,~.,.,~..S. Sneegas The }~ayor declared Resolution i,!o. 76P-26 duly passed and adonted. TE~NATIO~; - CONDITIOI:;AL USE PE?2[IT ?",O. 1125: Subnitted by John P. Younkin for termination of Conditional Use Permit i:.o. 1].25, previously granted to establish a convalescent hospital with adjoining "cottage type" minimum care ~mit~, Jp. accordance with the Planning Comr, ission~s conditions of approval for Reclassification ~:7o. 75-76-15 and Variance 7/o. 2757. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to %esolution ::,~o. ]'C75-267, terminated Conditional Use Permit ;','o. ] 125. 'Jo further action was taken by the City Council. ;" '" A. nsheim~ California - COU?~CIL ~'TINUT£S - Januarx, 20~., 1976~ 1'30 ~ it ~_,, al~! ~ ......................... . . . ...... TRACT NO. 8082 - FINAL FLOOR PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND SOUND ATTENUAT,ION MFASURES - FIliAL ~%P: (Reclassification ~.',o. 70-71-99) Developer, Pacesetter ~!o~es, Inc.; tract located on both sides of Fairmont Boulevard, north of Santa Ama Canyon ~load; containing 45 RS-5000 zoned lots. >'?iss Santalahti reported that the final floor plans, elevations and plans for sound attenuation measures were reviewed by the City Planning Commission at their January 19, 1976 meeting and determined to be identical with those ~reviously sub~.itted for Tract ~Tos. 8080 and 80~1. Consequently, they were approved by the City Plannin~ Cor~mission. -~eport from the City Engineer recommepds aporoval of Final ~',ap, Tract 7io. %,~82, reporting that said map conforms substantially with the tentative ~ap previously approved; that bond has been. pointed and required fees paid. In response to Councilman Seymour's question regarding ~,zhether or not Tract ?!os. 8080 and 8081 were approved prior or subsequent to adoption of Council Policy i~o. 542, IIiss Santalahti replied that these were approvec], prior to the adoption of that policy however at that period of time a contrition was routinely imposed upon the tentative tracts with essentially the saree re~uire- ~.~ent as the policy. ,Pn r,~otion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour, tT~e City Council approved the final floor plans, elevations and sound attenuation ?easures as submitted; further, proposed Tract ~io. ~0.B2, together ~;ith its design and improvement, was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and final map therefore was approved by the City Council, as recormnended by the City Engineer. Councilwoman Kaywood voted "no". Councilman Sneegas .absent. ?.~OTIO>~ CARRIED. F%iAL ?t~\P~ TRACT ~O. 8633: ~?eveloper, Car~ine Esposito; tract located on the northwest corner of Peralta [iills Drive and Cerro Vista l.:ay; containin~ six RS-HS-43,000 zoned lots. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond ~as been fo~,arded to the City Attorney for approval an~ required fees paid. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, propose~] Tract ~.~o. $633, together with desi~ and improve~ent, was found to be consistent with the City's Ceneral Plan and final map therefor was approved_ by the City Council, as recommended by the City Engineer. Councilman ?neegas absent. ~..~OT!Oi~ CARRIED. ..~?!~iCIAL. ~..qVE.'NT P.E..R~'~IT - DE_L...TACO: >~iss Santalahti reported that on investigation __ in connection with a tent recently erected at the northeast corner of Tadmar Avenue and 7.~uclid Street, it was ascertained that this was being use~t for seating purposes for the Del Taco fast-food restaurant located at 430 South !]uclid during remodeling of their existing facilities. The man.age~:ent has been advised that a special event permit x,zould be required but the application has not been received. She reported that she has contacted the four City Depart- ments involved in the Special Event Permit procedure and they advised it would .~_erely be a matter of this co~mpany submitting certain types of information. It is therefore recommended that a Special !~ve~.~t Parr.~it for a period not to exceed 30 days be granted. ,qn motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman !!aywood, the City Council approved a special event permit for a temporary tent to be erected and utilized for the purposes herein described by the Del Taco Pestaurant, South Euclid Street for a period mot to exceed 30 ~].ays from tl~is date (axpirins February 19, 1976). Csuncil~man Sn. eegas absent. ::OTIO~ CAR.PlED. UPD~I'i,'G OF STP~ET LIGI~ING - 1S00 F~LOCK OF ,~I~,~TICI,~:,,.~R .,OAD: ]'ursuant to direction given at the City Council meeting of December 30, 1075, for report regarding updating of street lightin~ in the 1800 block of C]~anticleer ~oad, recommendation was submitted from the Utilities 7]irector that the trees be trim-ed on this street and that a ne~ Z~lO0 lumen mercury vapor street light be installed at the east end of Chanticleer qoad on the existing power pole. The estimated cost for the work recommended is $,',26.23. 7 ~-4 6 City ]/.'all,_ Ana~b. eim.! California - CCUT?CIL ~I.~UT.:.,~, - ,January: 2q ~ 1976 ~..1: 30 P.". 3n motion by Councilman ?ebl'ey, seCOnded by CoUncilr;an ~]esm~our, the C~ty Council authorized the updatinc of the street li?,htinc and tree trir0'~min~ on tl~e 1800 block of Chanticleer qoad, as recommended by the Utilities Director. Councilman Sneegas absent· .~.~OTIC:~ CARFIED. ' ,.~_O.I~,~.~ CALE:~T~D. AR ITID{S: On motion by Councilman .q:~.yr~our, seconded by Council?-~an Pebley, the following actions ~,~ere authorized in accordance v?ith the repert reco-~-endations furnished each COuncil ~.~ember and as listed on the Consent Calendar ~ ~enda: 1. CLAIM AGAINST TIIE CITY: The followin? clnim ~:as denied and referred insurance carrier: a. Claim submitted hy Jesus Sanchez P. arez and ~;aria T~artinez T~varez for ~rongful death purport~dly~ resulting~ from unlawfully ~aintaine.d ~.~uy wire on pole m,~ed by the City of Anaheim, on or about ~qctober .o · ".~.~, 1975. ,,,..,'.r,,,,.,~,oPO~D~,.IC~:,. T~.m followiug correspondence ~,~as orc~ered received and fil~cd: a. Orange County ~.;osquitc .,~batenent ~istrict - "?.inures - Oecember 1975. b. Cultural Arts Cot~.ission - ?[inutes - ~,ecember 11, 1975. c. Financial and operating reports for the mo~,th of December ].975 for Arts Section and Customer Service Division· d. Before the PUC - Application of Greyhound Lines, !nc., for an order authorizing, a statex~ide increase in intrastate passencer fares and express rates and Greyhound Lines, Inc., Las Vegas-Tonopah-v. ano Stage Line, Inc., ()range Lelc Stages, a corporation, Peerless Stages, Inc,, and Vaca Valley t',us Lines for an order authorizing a statewide increase in interline express rates. Council:nan ~neegas~ . absent . "~:OTIO'~; r.]g. RP. IED. ,~S~LUT!O:~ ,',O~. 76,-,. ~ Ai~D .~..~.-,,.8'. Councilwoman. ;;a~,~ood offered ~esolution ;:c.~. 76!",-27 and 76P,-28 for adoption in accordance with the reports, reco~,~:;endat~ons amd certification furnished each Council :'?ember add as listed on the Consent Calendar A~enda. '~efer to Peso!ution l;ook. ]iESOLUTIOU ::IO. 76R-27 - DEEDS ,n.,F EASE~fEi,iT: ~, ~7. SOLUTIO~I OF 2]~E CI?f COU~ICIL 9F mil~ CITY OF ~.~AHEI?~ ACCEPTI~G CERTAI~I PE~D,, ;2.~g ' ~o ,.., ~'e~Tn:,, (C. :Iornan Pulliam; Vexaco~ Ventures, Inc. & Jnaheiv. 'Zills, Inc.; Lottie ~olz and Anna Bolz; J. Arthur Development ?,orp.; Teon. ard Vargas Provencio) r. EEOLUTIO].~ ];O. 761-28 - FINAL ~CCEPTA?'.?CE~ T,7OlIr. ~%OER ZO. 762-A: A r~F T~!E CITY COUi~C!L OF ~'IE CITY C.F .~2TAI!EIT-[ FI~ALLY ,:~CCEPT!UG T~iE CO?U'LETIOT{ ,.'VID TIlE ~Fd~ISi{I~G OF ~L PL~T, L~OR, SERVICZE, }fATEPIALS ;TTD ~IOUIP~5~].TT ,'~,.TTD ALL !Fl!LIT!ES ~21D TR~'.~SPORTATIO~ I!TCLUDIi~G PO~.~P., ~J]]L A~TD ~TAT':~]~., 'A~'iD TIiE )L~,TCE OF 7'.LL ?IOPC( i;ECESSAEY TO CO?~STRUCT A~TD rOT[~ETE 'lq.~]] FOLLOVI;.TG PUBLIC : ~ '~ ~ ~.I .ITEL LOOP DETECTOR ~'.,Tq~ IMPROVE]~I, IT, TO ~,TIT PU,.C~.AS /'2~D ~ELIVERY' OF 251TM G '~ODUL:]S Af.;D O~'.:E (1) DETECTOR LOOP F~QUE::.~CY ?ERST ?~TEg., I7,: ':~iE CITY OF ~fOPJ.L OP~DER ~O. 762-A. (Canoga Controls Corporation) 2oll Call Vote: · - Ceymour Pebley and Tlio~ AYES · COIY...~CIL I.~MBEP. S: ilaywood, ,., , . dOitS: COUi'~CIL >~EMBERS: 'Tone ABSE]'..:T: COUi~TCIL ?~MBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared P. esoluticn i'7os. 76'.!-27 and 76P.-28 duly 'passed and adopted. L;OPC-[ ORDER l,~O. 2095 - EASTRIDGE,..., P/ZSERVOIR: ~>n recomr~endation of the. C~,~.ty :;ngineer, on motion by Councilwoman ~2aywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, award of contract for 1,7ork Order :'.io. 2095 x~as continued pendinc approval of a reimbursement agreement between the City and Ana]~eim i'!ills, Inc. Council,~mn ,qnee ~as ab sent '.[OTIOTi C;HRRIED ~:, · · City ~.al~.l, Anaheim, Calif.o~ia - COUNCIL_.YINUTES - J.anuary 20 qCSOLUTION ~'~0. 762.-2.0 - AL'APd) .DF UOR.K OPal)ER :Y). 99~5: !n accordance with recom- ~"~endations of the City Engineer, Co~cilman Pebi'ey" offered Pesolution for adoption. lefer to Xesolution 7;ook. ,\ ?ESOLUTIO]~ OF TIIE CITY COUiiCIL OF TIiE CITY OF ,,C;AI!EI:.! ACCEPTING A ~EALED ]'R~o POSAL ,.CID AWNING A CONTRACT TO THE LOI.~ST KESPOITEIELE EIDDER FOR Tile ~I~IIE';i- ll[G OF JgL PL~C,IT, L~OR, SERVICES~ r,~TERIALS ,a'[D []QUIPT~]Z'iT .~%[D Z.LL UTILITIUS ,:W.[D fR~iSPOFJfATION, !N~UDINC POI,~R, ~EL ..,?iD i'IATER, ArID ]~EPFOEYlNG ALL ,IOPd[ ]iECLSSARY TO CONSTP~CT A;_;D CO~I, ETE TIIE FOLLO!..iI[iG FUBLIC IHPROVE?'~i[T: POLICE ];UiLDIi[G CO)~PLETION OF gECO>ID FLOOR, 425 SOUTH 7IARZOR. BOULEVAPrJ, ITI Tile CITY Af~AXEIi. I, IfO~i O~ER NO 9995 (Arrow Luilders, g19 985 00) qoll Call Vote; ,,~: .... c' COUNCIL ....... ..':~.,~,~o~,.,.,o.~"° · i:laywood, Seymour, ?ebl. ey and Thor. -,?OCS ' ~ '" ,~OU-CIL · ;.DDEi;T: COUNCIL ~%:.~ZR$: ~neegas The >~ayor declared Resolution ilo. 76:~-29 duly passed and adopted. ~3072:1 ORDER i;O. 794 - PLAY .'..']QUIPHENT~ ',~'IZA~iITA PARK: The Assistant City ::~anacer recormnended that this work order be held over and that a model of the proposed play equipment or some additional information be provided inasmuch as this is a purchase in the amount of $18,800 from a single source, _~{agnum Contractors ?.ervice being the only supplier of this type of product. In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, .'~.,~r. Talley advised that he would also request information from the supplier regarding the cost for fire proofinE of this play equipment. ~XIRCliASE OF EQTIIP~,'~NT - POLICE STATIO.N L'AGONS: r.'.'.r. Talley reported on informal. bids received for the purchase of four intermediate and three full-sized station wagons for the Police Department and advised that Santa .-~na Do,:i~e is t;~.e low bidder when the trade-in allowances are ca].culated. }it therefore recommended acceptance of the low bid as follows: ;;id 7;0. 3019 - Santa Aha Dodge, $38,308.02, includin~ tax and less trade- ins ($5,300.00). On motion by Councilman ?ebley, seconded by Councilwoman ]l~v~,:ood, the ].o':.:,' bid of Santa /ma Dodge was accepted and purchase authorized in the a~ount of .~33,00o.0=,~ ~ including tax and trade-in allowances. Councilman Snee?~as absent. ' ~.C;TIO;"I (',AR?,IED. ?URCI~ASE ,.,'F 2QUIP>fi~NT - PLATFO~c,{ SCALE: The Assistant City ~anger reported on infoz~al bids received for the purchase of a platform scale (install,ed complete) for the Electrical Division and recommended acceptance of the low bi:t as follows: ~ ' * including tax :;id .,o. 3024- Western Scale, ¢:,,nabezm.- g6,.~63.18, . '.?,~t ~otion by Councilrmn 3eymour, seconcte~ by Councilwo,man ;(,~,,ooJ,. ti~e low ]~i~J of T.:estern Scale was accepted and purc~mse authorized in the amount of ";',,363.15, including tax. Councilman £neegas absent. ~OTiO~? CAPRIED. O'~OINA,'ICZ ;cOS. 3495 .,CID 3496: Councilwoman llaywood offered Ordinance 'Tos. 3/,,95 and 3496 for adoption. Paler to Ordinance !look. I~RDI';L\;'TCE 7'fO 3495' "' · · ,',., qRDI;.L'~2~CE OF ~iE CITY ~F A,~A.:".;~I,'~ '~'""~"'~ING TITLE ]./~, r.:'iTA'"r;TER 14.32 ,OF Tile ANAItEIM ?,U;;ICIPAL C~Dr',.,,.. .~., ~.Y..,:\D,'"",I'"',..; C ~,.,.,,,.,,: ,, ., . .,r' ""' "" "'" "' """ ' 14 .32. /~. ?,'~.. ..... " ,,~:,,,TRICT.~D '"'"' 2 :',,~ ~.,\I,~i~;C TO PAPJ~i.',;C ..... -,. FACILITATE,:',TEE:,, .... S~;EEFI;;G ....~",~ ........ .,, ,.~ ~,,:Sn~'-,'e.,:~,.~, - .... ' ...... O" STREETS DESIC';ATED -T .... .x. ? .. TO 3 ,.,'i:,L 7;.:, ; 0>,, . ~'''r' ''~ ~t~ ...... ~, BY ,¢DDiNG SECTIOI;S ]4.3~..d90 AND City iial,l.~t Anaheim~ California - COUr.~CIL .'..~NUTES - January,, 20 1076~ 1.:30 14.32.410 P~,'RTAIL'I?'!G.. TO ]~API'.I:,~C .~ESTRIC~ED ......... ~'O FAC!LITATTM, .~,~,~.,~~ ....w f~]EPIiW-, C,Y ~.T, Di'~ESDAYS, ;[OURS ,~'~D STrC:,ZTS ~-,elG~AT..D-, ?~', . :!oll Call Vote: ..%%E~' ' ~'.COUNCIL ' ~ ~ ~ J'~]''~[]]~':'S ' ~ ~ ~l~ ' i[aB~ood, ,..>eymour,° Pabley and Thom ..~OES: (.',,qUi.~CIL ?E,X[3E!.'.S: 'i Ions ABSEI!T' COUNCIL ~.~ =w~,¢. . . ~Mo ....... Snee gas The i.~ayor declared (Prdinance ~,os. 34!)5 and 3z~96 duly passed and adopted. .%':,DI~A..~C~., EO. 3498: Councilman Thom offered ~rdinap~ce '!o. 3498 for first r cad in g. C.-iLIFOR?.IIA STATZ i.:;'IGHI~IAY CO~9..~ISSIOI~ - '.IOUTZ 57 FEZ?Z~AY: Councilwoman ]iaywood reported that she has been given time on the i~ighway Corrnission 4zen~!a on Friday, January 23, 1976 to testify regarding the ?oute 57 Freeway sound attenuation and site screening problems and that Supervisor Ralph .Clark wi]i utilize five minutes of the time she has been. allotted to indicate his support for prompt resolution of the matter. ~:{~kI~I .PEP~4IT TO ~ffER FOR CO~-~STEUCTIO?! PURPOSES - ,.,~:.,~,',~ ~'~LLS PROPEPTY: coUncii~mman ,la~o'od r~ported thli' the contractor for the Santa Ana '.~iver Interceptor Sewer will need perr~ission to enter across the Shorb ~'Yells property by February 1, 1976. She reported that this is the location approved by Public !7orks Department for the sewer alignment. Due to the critical time fra~e~ Councilwoman Kay,od thereupon moved that an interim, permit to enter across the ~]horb Wells property for construction purposes of the ........ nra ;ma ~iver Interceptor Sewer be granted, subject to further documentation to be presented for Council action. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. Councilman Sneegas absent. >IOTI0.J CARRIED. COUNTY SN:~ITATIOi'~ DISTRICT - i]XPEi;SE ALLOI~TAI~CES FOP, CO~.9.(ISSION!~.RS: Councilwoman Kaywood discussed the $50 compensation and expense allowance currently provided for Sanitation District Directors for ~.onthly meetings. She advised that a revision of the Health and Safety Code permits payment to the Directors for r~ore than one meetin? per month, either on the basis of one meeting per district per month or for each special meetip~ called. She requested Council comment on the matter so that she ~fght report their position, at the next meeting. Following brief consideration, because of the discussion and actJ..on takem earlier in the meeting resarding expense allowances for City of Anaheim Boards and Commissions, the City Council declined to take an official position on the ;,~atter. Mayor Thom favored the approval of additional payment as this improves attendance at the meeting; Councilman Seymour was opposed and Councilman Pabley felt that the current $50 compensation should be designated to cover two meetinss per month, CITY ~IPLOYEZ§~ L,LOOD EAi~X ?ROGRA~.[: l.,:~ayor Thom introduced a letter received from _ ,i i __ ~ 1__~ ,11~ the Orange County Chapter of the American !{.ed Cross congratulating% the City employees on a very successful blood bank program and specifically commending -members of the City Personnel Department for their cooperation in helping, the iled Cross achieve 103.71!~ of the quota. AD~JOUP~>_~IENT:_ _ Councilman ?ebley moved to adjourn to Uednesday, January 21, 1976, 7:30 P.iI. at the Management Control Center. Coun. cil~,~an Seymour seconded the ~otion. Councilman Sneegas absent ~OTIO~.i CARRI,~D. Adjourned: 3:40 P.M. ALONA M. HOUGARD, CITY CLERK Deputy