1976/03/02Tile City Council of tlie City of ;z~aheim ~et ir, regular session.
I'~ES£JT: COU~iCIL ~;,'~BE?.C: ~:aywood, Seymour, T'ebley, Cneegas and Thom
, ~ ~ o~ .~,~: ',}one
I~}CiSZ,:T: A~ICTAi~T CITY ~A:~A~Eh: ~,~illiam O. Talley
CITY ATTO~TEY: Alan
DEPUTY CITY C~
.... ~.a~: Linde D. Roberts
POLICE CiIIEE: Harold E. astrup
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Carry O. McRae
ASSIST,~T DIRECTOR, PL~NIFIG: Don !4cDaniel
ZOi~ING SUPERVISOR: Annika Camtalahti
CITY E:.~GIi~I:ER: James P. ~?addox
l,'ayor Thom called the meeting to order amd welcomed tt~ose in attendance
to the Council meeting.
I'i~VOCATIO[,~: heverend Dennis .,.qailey of the l~elodyland }'~otline Center gave the
Invocat ion.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman oohn' Seymour led the ,~ssemb~y' in. the Fledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
PD. OCLAI';ATION: The following proclamation was issued hy ~!ayor Thorn and una. mi-
mously approved by the City Council:
"IiCET -Festival ~7g .... 17eek"- ,'~arch f~ throuc~:~,~ 2], 1~'7~~, ,,
~ir. Gary lilausen accepted the oroclamation on behalf of KCET.
PRLo~',,~A~IO.., Presentation by qtewart c ';oodard, ~resx. cent of the '?.oard of
Trustees, ~.outh.~ Coast Repertory Tl~eatre, of their lQth anniversary ~urochure,
scheduled at this point was made later in the meeting. ?fr, ~.7oodard invited
Council ~:embers to the special performance to be held June 17, ]q76 at wi~ich
time all elected officials of !%range County cities will ~e present.
:4INUTES: '?inutes of the Anaheim City Council ?..egular ?:aeting held January 27,
197(i, were approved, with corrections, on motion by Councii~:oman ~'.aywood,
seconded by Councilman Pebley. Councilman Cneegas abstain~'~,] from voting due to
absence from that meeting ,,~T~ ....
· ~ -.~,...,, i CAT.EI.~,D.
WAIVER OF P.E;J)INC - ORDINANCES .?q?D EE,GOLUTIO:~S; Councilwoman 7la~vood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolu'ticns, and t]mt consent
to the waiver of reading is hereby ~' ~
omven by al~ Council ~"e~'~l;ers unless, after
readln2 of t]~e title, specific request ts ~mdc '.:-~ a ~o,~:mt]. '~c~icr ~or the
rea:ling of such ordinance or resolution. Councilnan Paisley seconded t~e
motion. ~OTIOX U~IANI~OUSLY C,12EIED.
~,F. Ol/l'!~ O~ ........ ~z:/'~n,~5~.oq.., in accordance with the 197.5-76 E. ud~et, v~:-e approvetl.
Cor~pany) ~":~ ~ '.m . .. ~
L_ ~laidinger of Arthur Toun!~ 't Cov. panv pr..sente~ thc report on
thc results of the ?'~anageuen. t Practices .,ludit of the City /ttor~ey's qffice.
'.ie outlined the .~cope of the review conc~,ucted. As a result of the sgudy it was
concluded that the City Attorney's 9ff~ce is providin? adequate support to the
City's operating departments and to the City Council, and their services are
~mll received by those utilizing them. ::e su~:~narized the responsibilities and
functions of the City Attorney's Office and reported that in order to accom-
plisi~ these there are eig1~t professional and si:: clerical personp, el _~n the
~:ffice. The work load is divided into C~vil, Criminal an<:! 7qsucmeanor prosecu-
tions.
'Ir. i'.aidinEer explained that in order to determine the ~oasonab].eness of
the overall expenditure for the City Attorney's operation, t]~cy compared this
~)ffice x.,ith cities of comparable size, iFuntington
terms of officc personnel, while >.~',almim has 1/~ mc~bero, ~u~t:[nFton ~.;each l:as
!I and Zanta Aha 14. Anaheim's ~33,3QQ bud/et is reas~nnL]y clo~e to tlm
otl~ers, I~untington ?,each in. dicatin~ ':232~q3C and Fanta /.l:~;~ ':/:'~q,'33:'~, '[~ v~ew
of the fact that the City Attorney'-: ~ff]ce ~n Anaheim prosecutes ~:'~ o~;m ftatc
law ~,is(~cmeanor cases, as well as t~e fact that
City ila!l.a' AnaheimI California - COUi,'CIL ,'~INUTK% - 'torch 2..I ].9761. 1::30 P.:4.
legal problems in view of the Convention Center and g'tadium, the Arthur Young
Company concludes that the City Attorney's Office is performing in a rsasonably
cost-effective manner in comparsion to these two other cities.
"~r .!aidinger reported that the City
~?ith regard to the facilities, , ."
Attorney's Off~ce is currently located in leased space at a cost of I3.5 cents
per square foot, whereas office space ~n Anah~i:'~ now averages between 6,~ to
cents per square foot. Tt~e Artl~ur Youn[~ ~, Company opinion is that the City
Attorney's facilities in general are sul;standar~t and the City would be well
advised to improve l~oth the layout and general appearance of this office.
review of the compensation pai.:l to position of City ;ttorney III, with the
benchmark for that position indicates that snlarv levels are reasonable.
~r. I:aidinger explained t]mt ;.rthur Youn~ .%~ Company was requested to
address the question as to whet]~.er or not the City Atto:rney is contracting out
sufficient or too nuch of its work to independent firms, however a-s they are
not attorneys, they do not consider themselves to }e in a position to make ::his
evaluation. '~tr..',laidinger diJ c'o~ment that a substantial portion of the legal
work being done for the Redevelopraent ,~g. ency is being contracted out and ti%is
work is clearly within the scope and competence of the CJ.ty Attorney's staff.
7~ assist J~n neasuring the work. load in the City Attorney's Office. the
Arthur Young L Company recon~nends a slr;p].e trac~;ing syster he establfslted wi;ich
will identify the work load and per~';~tt fair allocation of assignments to the
Attorneys. ?]~is would also provi. Je t~,..e, ~.'eans for evaluating performance a.:d a
basis ~or c~st allocation to u,cer
'Ir. Haidinger reported that Anaheim is the only City in !3range County
which prosecutes its own Crate law misde]'~eanor case:3 and does nog utilize
Office of the ]'.~istrict AttorneY. T',~e ;rt]~ur 7oung t, Company recommends tlu~
these State law misdemeano~ prosecutions be transferred to tile
Attorney' Office since the cost to the CJ..ty to prosecute these is approxilaa~.e, lY
$19~q,qO0, although a portion of this is attributable to C~ty ordinance viola-
tions. This idea was reviewed with the ?tare Controller, and he advised the:
this transfer would not affect the tax rate which could ~.:,e levied by the City,
IIr. ~iaidinger recognized 'that there are so~ae benefits which accrue to the Ci:ty
from performing its own State law prosecutions, namely, that t'he City Attorney
feels these are a good training ground for new Attorneys; the convenience
afforded the t'olice Pepartraent in schedulinK and liaison; and that the prosecu-
tions r~lay be more effective and less e:cpensive for the I:oltce Department,
At the conclusion of the presentation, Councilman Pebley r~oted that the
An~Jmim Attorney's Office compares even better with that of the City of Santa
Aa~.a when it is taken into consideration that the City of Anaheim has its own
electrical distribution system, and the legal problems involved therewith take
up a considerable portion of the City Attorney's time,
During discussion, Councilman Sneegas stated that there must be some
benefit to :he citizens of Anaheim in the form of more efficient prosecution
and more local control from the practice of the City A~orney prosecuting all
misdemuanor prosecu'~ions, '
Councilman Seymour pointed out that the ha.~ic .~ssue at stake is that thru
citizens of Anaheim are paying twice for prosecution of State misdemean~or
case.s, lie voiced the opinion that the City of ~naheim should either Be
provided some relief in its tax rate or these cases sl%ould., in fact, be turned
over to the District Attorney's C, ffice for prosecution.
It w~as noted th.at tl~ere is presently no way to compare whether the City
Attorney's Office is more successful in these prosecutions than the District
Attorney's Office,
Chief ,qastrup advised that when these prosecutions are performed b,y .the
City Attorney's C:ffice it does allow t}te Police ,nepartment more local control
in vice and other types of arrests; tl,~t ;,e did not think the City would
receive the sar,e quality of prosecution service currently enjoyed tt~rough the
City Attorney's ,nffice if transferred; that there Js a savings factor .in tire
spent l~y ~fficers at the courts; and that currently many small problems are
handled directly at the City Attorney's ~ffice.
76-164.
City Hal!.; .An. aheimI Cali. fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES -.}.larch 2t 1976t 1;30 P,M.
Councilman Seymour stated .that he concurred with Councilman Sneegas that
he would prefer the City Attorney's Office to continue these prosecutions,
recognizing these benefits, if the County would make some appropriate
reimbursement to the City for performing this work. However, if they are not
amenable to this, because of the sum of money involved, estimated at $75,000 to
$100,000 annually, he felt the Council has no choice but to transfer this
particular activity, as the other cities in the County have done, to the .
District Attorney's Office.
~ir. Watts commented that he has Been aware for some time that his Office
is probably understaffed for performance of both the criminal and civil func-
tions and has been awaiting the presentation of this report for a decision from
the Council as to which way the Office should go.
In response to Councilwoman ~{aywood, lit. Watts .advised that within the
last six to seven years a number of Orange County cities have transferred their
misdemeanor prosecutions to the District Attorney's Office, but he was not
aware of the reasons behind this action. Councilwoman Kaywood requested that
these reasons be investigated.
In reply to Councilman Seymour, Mr. Watts reported that it would be appro-
priate for the City Attorney's Office to contact the Board of Supervisors and
determine whether or not they are willing to allow the City of. Anaheim a Change
in the fines and forfeitures paid by the City to reflect the cost of Anaheim's
prosecuting its own cases. He advised that presently the City's contract with
the County is the same as every other city, all cities in the County paying a
un if otto assessment.
.At the conclusion of discussion, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by
Council~mn Seymour, the City Council received and approved the report from the
Arthur Young & Company on the ~!anagement Audit of the City Attorney's Office
and directed that staff make the appropriate contacts with the County Board of
Supervisors regarding the reimbursement for City prosecution of State
misdemeanor violations with report back to the Council. }.~OTION CARRIED.
VJCPORT - P, ESULTS OF ~,IE M2C;AGE>~NT PRACTICES ;~UDIT - CITY ~AGER'S OFFICE:
(Arthur Young & Company) Mr. Tim Haidinger presented the reports to Council on
the results of the Management Practices Audit of the City }!anager's Office. He
clarified that this review was different from those conducted in other City
Departments in that the investigation was conducted toward determining the
harmer in which the City l~nager~s Office should be reorganized, recognizing
that a number of changes had already taken place.
The recon~endations resulting from the study were reviewed with Council as
follows: that the position of Deputy City ~[anager be established, said posi-
tion being responsible for implementation of the proposed Management by
Objectives System. Job descriptions for the City Manager, Assistant City
l[anager, Deputy City ~anager and Finance Director were included in the report.
A number of functions which previously reported to the City Manager's Office
were recommended for .reassignment in order to reduce the span of control in the
City Manager's Office. !te reported on the recommendation that a long-range
planning committee be formed which would consist of the !,~ayor, Vice ~.!ayor, City
l~lanager, Assistant City Manager and Deputy City Manager. A succession plan for
the City :fanager position was described wherein the Deputy City Manager posi-
tion could be terminated after an interim period (approximately two years) when
the other personnel changes are made. The report further recommended that
personnel in the City Manager's Office be increased by one additional Budget
.~zalys t position.
,On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the
City Council received the report submitted by Arthur Young & Company on the
results of the Management Practices Audit of the City ?ianager~s Office and
directed that the recormmendations contained therein be implemented. I.~oTION
CARRIED.
ALLEGED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CItARGES - COUNCIL}lAN SNEEGAS: Mayor Thom read a
note received from lit. Michael Remington inquiring whether the City Attorney
has yet rendered his opinion, on Councilman Sneegas' alleged conflict of
interest.
76-1K~5
~_itj ..fl..all.,, Anaheim, California - COLqICIL ?~'I/iUTIF, S - ~'rarch 2} lq7.61m' l:3fl
Mr. Watts reported that ,he bas been in contact w~t)~ ~ucene Jacobs' ~)ffice
as they wish to have benefit of their opinion anJ s~bould render an opinion for
the Council in the m, iddle of ~.'a, rch ln76.
The l'ayor recognized Y.r. ?fJ. ct~ael Pemington who veined his disappointment
that the City Attorney and City Council bare, to date, taken no action in ~this
matter when the municipal election is six weeks ,-..way. ~'.n.. disclosed that his
client, The Telephone Taxpayers' ;~ssocJation, is interested in this matter
Being aired and cleared
Mayor Thom stated that he ~,ms concerned by any intimation that he wm's a
part of any cover-up in this matter, lite reiterated that he felt because both
himself and Councilman Sneefms were vying for the sa~e political office, that
he personally should not conduct any hearings on the matter.
Councilman fneegas requested per'mission to adCress the City Councfl as a
citizen of Anaheim and was recognized ~y the ~ayor. i:'la referreJ to the
tion ~ubmitted at the Council neetin~ cf February 2Z,, 1976 (on file ~n t!)e
Office of the City Clerk) which infers that he (Councilmsn "neegas)has 'been
evasive about the lease of the building at !11] ~7orth Tustin ;venue. ~o refute
that allegation, Councilman Snc~Cas dis?laye~ an ~dvertic~e',~.t ~npouncin~~. the
:::eying of his business to the new location which was taken out in a local
paper, together wish a feature article about the move and the business., In
addition, Council'~mn Snee~as noted that on February 5, !976 he had written and
released to the press an announce~ent tl,at a question had Leon raised of his
possible conflict o'f interest due to the location of his business. ~e also
read excerpts from the }{inures of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency meeting of
Augus~ 9~ 1975 and ~aheim City Council meeting of October 7, !975 on which
occasions Councilman 5neegas specifically announced his lease-hold interest in
the proper~y at 1'111 North Tustin Avenue and requested ~ ruling from the City
Atto~ey's Office as to whether or not he could or could .not v,ote on the de,i-
mien pertaining to the storm drain whicl~ was before the Agency/Council at the
time.
In addition, Councilman £neegas contended that if he had wished to
capitalize on redevelopment activities, he would have been in a better pomitiom
to do so had he remaine,q at his former place of business, C85 South 7]ast
Street. ilo showed the comparative distances to the downtown Project Al'phc a.r~a
of his present and former locations on a City map.
In conclusion., Councilman Sneegas stated that he felt 'it will be ex~.~remely
difficult because of she political pressure being exerted on this matter for
the City Attorney's Office to render an impartial decision.
Following Councilman Sneegas~ presentation, 'Councilman Seymour stated :~h:a=
he felt this ~ssue should be ,removed from politics and placed before the ~ppr,~-
priate body for ,same decision. Councilman Seymour thereupon moved that the
City Attorney be dl=ected to take this matter to the State Attorney General's
Office and the County District Attorney's Office for further investigation.
Council~,~man Kaywood seconded the motion. ~OTION CARRIED.
Councilman Sneegas ~'tated that he concurred with the action but questioned
whether all pertinent factual information would be submitted and not jus~t .tb:e
allegat lo ns.
I,t was noted that all pertinent information will be made available for
these invest igations.
Councilman Seymour commented that he felt it incumbent that to the ext~nt
possible this matter be cleared up before election day.
?iESOLUTIO~i ,,0. 762-94 - JUVENILE DIV,.,I,,.~IOij G~.%' On recom~endation of the C]~lef
of rolice, Councilman Seymour offered ~esolution No. 76D~-'94 for adoption,
authorizing the execution of an agreement with the City of garden Grove 'to
participate in the Juvenile J)iversion grant Project.
P, efer to Resolution ]~ook.
A I~ESOLUTIO[; OF T,[.?] CITY COU;~CII, CT TIlL SITY OF ,\i!AI!I]IN ;PPROVI'.~i'.G '"1:i .... ~-~,,e
......... ~t, A~D
CONDITIOUS ~F ;Li ,~C~K';~'IT EF]'?I~t?~ ~l '71~}] CITY OF ,~,] ..... ~
......... ~A,.~.~I.-I fJ;D q'if~ CITY F~F CARDT',~
76-166
~ity i~al!~ Anaheim~ C..alifornia - COUNCIL }'[I!'UJTES'- ~arch 2~ 1Q76~ 1:30 P.:i.
GROVE R!]LATIiIC TO PARTICIPATION IN T/tE JUVEiIILE PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION PROJECT ;CID
~,~E )~YOR ~'ID ~IE CI~ CLE~( TO EXECUTE SAID AG~Et~NT ON BEIIALF OF
Tiie CITY OF
Ioi1 Call Vote:
AYES: COL%~CIL ~ZHBEP. S: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
~.~OES: COUNCIL ~L~RS: None .
~o .... ~: CO~CIL ~.~-~ERS: i~one
The ~'fayor declared Resolution No. 76R-94. duly passed and adopted.
2EC2£S_: I~y general consent the Council took a five-minute recess. (3:~0
,,'-'~..~ ..... C,,~o. ?.',ayor Thom called the meeting to order, all members of the City
~'~ouncil being present. (~:05 P.~.) ~
~JiiiLIC .[E7~ING - VARIAI:CE NO. 2768: Application of Uilliam D. Ehrle for the
following Code waivers to permit establishment of an office in the RS-7200' Zone
on property located 838 South State College Boulevard was submitted together
with application for negative declaration status from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report;
a. Permitted uses.
b. Permitted signing.
Tl~e City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. I'C76-8, recom-
mended that subject project be declared exempt from the requirement to prepare
an environmental impact report and granted Variance No. 2768, in part,
approving waiver "a" for a period of two years and denying waiver "b" subject
to the following conditions:
1.. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a s~rip of land .53 feet in width from the centerline of the street
along State College Boulevard, including a 15-foot radius property line return
for street widening purposes.
2. That the existing structure shall be brought, up to the minimum
standards of the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building, Plumbing,
Electrical, ilousing, Mechanical and Fire Codes, as adopted by the City of
Anaheim.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
i~os. 1 and 2; provided, however, that the signing shall be in accordance with
code standards. '
4. That Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
the cor, unencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to
the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of one year ,
from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning
Commission and/or City Council may grant.
5. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
6. That this variance shall be granted for a time limitation of '~wo (2)
years, subject to review and consideration by the Planning Commission and/or
City Council for an extension of time, upon written request by the petitioner.
7. That the subject variance shall be granted for the petitioner's own
office use only and no portion of the property shall be rented for use by
o the rs.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested by
Councilwoman Kaywood at the City Council meeting of February 10, 1976, and
public hearing scheduled this date.
,'.liss Santalahti described the land uses and zoning surrounding subject
property and briefly described the applicant's proposal. She briefed the facts
submitted to and considered by the City Planning Cor~mission and explained the'
rationale upon which they based their decision. She noted that the Planning
Cot, mission included in their approval of Variance No. 2768, the direction that
an area development plan be initiated so that by the time the two-year period
for which the variance has been granted has expired, the appropriateness, of use
in the area may be determined.
7F,-167
City 7!all. Anaheimm California - COiUUCIL ',rT.~.,~UTEiS ~ o lq76~ 1.:30 ~.'~.
- , ......... i ....... ~ ........... -- i ~, 'flr,cii'~, _.,~' ! ' - ....
The Yn. yor esl:e,.! if t!,.o ~?plicnnt or his agent was present and satisfied
with the recommendations of the City ?!arming Commission.
'irs. George '7. LLrle, 552 fherwood Orive, zknaheim, advised that She was
rcFrasentin[~ her son as ti~e joint partner in the property.
Council~.,or..:an Za~ood adviseF., ti,at following tl~e '~lanning Commission
approval of Variance ~.7o. 276~{, she was advised that there were two offices
being rented out at that location, whereas the variance was approved strictly
for use by .'.'tr. Ehrle and not for rental. She pointed out that this provision
is covered by Condition !~o. 2 of ~he City Planning Commission P. esolution
PC76-~ and was stipulated to by Mr. Ehrle at the Planning Commission hearing.
Mrs. Ehrle advised that her son performs co.unity relations work fo= .the
Covenant Presbyterian Ci~urch and in connection therewith has pe~itted the
Finance Chairman the use of some office space because of the lack of facilities
in the Church. The gentleman using this space has full-time employment else-
where and is not being charged any rental.
;i[rs. Ehrle added that she did not understand why her property has not be~
afforded the same rights as others in the area which have been converted to
office use, that of being able to rent space. She noted that properties ~.
their street and across the street are able to rent; that there is a shopping
center located 200 feet from subject property; and that they are not able to
sell with an ~%IA loan because it is not considered suitable for residential
use, it is considered a business area.
In response to Yrs. Ehrle's question, ?~ayor Thom advised tkat she ~,~oUld
not be denied the right to rent office space provided that the types of
activities to which the space was rented did not cause an undue b~rden on
property or adjacent properties, specifically in ,terms of parking. She
advised that the procedure to follow would be to submit an applicat£on fox
change in the conditions or for a new variance or conditional use permit wt~h
information as to the specific uses of the proposed lessee and this wo~ld
evaluated by the Planning Commission and City Council on its own merits.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to .address the Council either in
favor or in opposition to Variance Uo. 276cq; there being no response, he
declared the hearing closed.
E~.VIRO, II~iTAL_ Ii4PACT REPORT - 7IEGATIV2 DECLARATION: On motion by Council~
Se~°Ux.' seconded by C'~uncilman Shackles,~ tile. 'Ctt~' Council finds that this
project will have no significant effect on the environment and is, th.erefo~e,,,
exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. MOTTON
C AFdlIED.
.,~oOLUl,~,10~c ~ '~ 'I0. 76R-95 : Council~n Seymour offered Resolution ~o.' 76~-05 for
i ~ --
adoption, granting Variance l. lo. 276~, in part, as recOmli~ended by, and subject
to the conditions of, the City Planning Co~ission.
2efer to Resolution .uook.
2oll Call Vote:
"vi'°: COUi~CIL ?,'~.l.I.n. EP.S: i'.aywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneecas and Thom
"~3~'e' CObq~CIL ~3ERe
................ : J.Ton e
;3S:::;T: COUJCIL ~%i. IBEPS: ?~one
Tl~e i'.ayor declared ?~esolution ~'!o. 76R-~5 duly passed nnd adopted.
.I:T~OLUTIO. i :'.O 76P.-96 - GR;JiT DEED COLwEYI',IG CITY-q!.~.iED PP. nFE~'.Ti' -
,~'f, ms'~L :
(Southeast 6°~er of L~ Pal~a .!venue ~nd Je{'ferson ~etreet") Upon report
from the City Attorney that the original deed conveying property to
i~r. Zachandy, ,e~ al~ in exchange for property conveyed to the City at
southeast co.er of Or.ge and l~estern Avenues, Councilman Pebley offered
Resolution '.~o. 76R-96 for adoption.
7~-165 ,
Qity kall, Anaheimt C.a!ifornia -. COUNCIL MINUTES - l{arch 2; 1976! 1;30 P.M.
'iefer to Resolution kook..
:\ ?iJSOLUTION OF TilE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF :~2~AIIEIM AUTiIORIZING
bIRECTi~:G Tile EXECUTION OF A GRAi~T DEED TO F~EPLACE A I,OST DEED. (Etchandy)
,~oll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL ~PJERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
~OES: COL~.~CIL I.~'.DBERS: i~one
~.~,S~.,T: COUNCIL I, Zi'~E~S: Uone
The l~iayor declared Resolution Uo. 76R-96 duly passed and adopted.
2.-~J:~OLUTIOI'~ :70. 76R-97 - REqUIRE>~NTS .~/~D COST ;2'~ALYSIS; UEW CENTP, AL ~ · .v- · -
' ' . IAINT~JAA C~
FACILITY (ARTHUR YOUHG & CO~.~Uf~: Councilman Thom offered Resolution :to. 76R-97
for ~'dopt'ion." -
Refer to Resolution Book·
A FiZSOLUTIOi~ OF ?lIE CITY CO~CIL OF THE CITY OF AI~AHEIM APPROVING ~"HE TERBIS fC~D
C~mw"lOi:S OF Ai~ AG~E~HT WI~{ ARTitUR YOUNG ~'~D COMP~.~ TO PERFO~.~ COJSULTI:'~G
SZi-'.ViCi]S &lID AUTtIORIZING ~tE ~,~YOR ~!D CITY CLE~ TO EXECUTE' SAID AG~E~I'-IT ON
BEiiALF OF THE CITY. (Not to exceed $23,000)
~oll Call Vote:
COUNCIL ~.~MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
COUNCIL }fEMBERS: I!one
COUNCIL }~MBERS:
The }~ayor declared Re~olution No. 76R-97 duly passed and adopted.
F, ESOLUTIOH ~]0 76R-98 - MOttLER DRIVE NO 5 ~2L,EXATION: Pursuant to authority
granted by the Local Ag~ency Formation Com~nission Resolution i'!o.. 76-1&,
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-95 for adoption·
';lefer to Resolution Book·
RESOLUTION OF 2]{E CITY CO~']CIL OF T ~,v .~:AHEIM APPROVING
Ln CITY OF
TIO:~ TO T1!2 CITY OF ~tEIM OF ~IE TERRITORY ~C'~OI~'~ ~;D DESI~ATED ~'~OI~ER DRI~
~:0. 5 .g~i~E~TION. (3.22 acres of uninhabited territory)
~oll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL }~2HBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
'~,? 0 ,i-,~,
...... ~: COUNCIL ~.~MBERS: None
The }!ayor declared Resolution No. 76R-98 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTIOi! :70 76R-99 - ANAHEIM t!ILLS 7TO 16 ;d-L.,~XATION: Pursuant to authority
granted by the Local Agency F'°~ation Co~ission P. esolution .iio. 76-16,
Councilnan Se~our offered Resolution No. 76R-99 for adoption.
2efer to Resolution Book.
A Pl]SOLUTIO.~I OF T!tE CITY CO~ICIL OF T~IE CITY O.F ,~IAHEIM APPROVING TUiE 7LN~IEXA-
TIOU TO TIlE CITY OF ANAIiEIM OF T]iE TERRITORY I%NO',~l AND DESIC~ATED A!IA}IEI}i HILLS
..... 16 A~CIF, XATION. (28·46 acres of uninhabited territory)
2oll Call Vote:
,'\YES: COU.~CIL ~MBEP~: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
~OES; COUNCIL ~.'~MBERS: None
Af~SEiiT: COL~'~CIL ~ERS: ~one
.'.
The ??ayor declared Resolution ~.Io. 76R-99 duly passed and .adopted·
CY~SULTA~ - ~]EDER CONNECTOR TRANSPORTATiOI] STUDY: Joint recommendation from
the Planninc and Community Development Departments that ~he firm of Parsons,
76-169
City,,,, !l ,al% ~ ,~nahei~, California - CODICIL MINUTES - ,'larch ? 1976 I:20, ~.',I.
-rinkerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc., be selected to perfor,~ the study entitled
"Anaheim Intraclty Transportation System- ~!ultimodal Transportation Center and
l~isneyland/Convention Canter to Downtown Feeder - Connector Link" was subr.~itted
for Council approval.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that the official title for the study does not
include the ,~a~aheim Stadium and requested that this be added.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman 7.'.aywood, the
City Council approved the sel'ection of Parsons, Brinkerhoff, r!uade and Douglas~
Inc., to perform the study and directed staff to negotiate a contract with said
firm. ~[OTIOi~ CARRIED.
:iZ~gOLUTIOi; 150. 762-100 - I~STER AGREEliEi.(T UO lO .AiID cu~P~,~'~'?m
..~+o~,.:.~. P?,Q~.EC~S: Councilwoman i[a~ood offe're'~' ~.esolution Yo. 7'6~.-100 fh~-'--
adoption, approving ~ecution of the Local Agency - C~ate ~[aster Agreemen: ~;o,
lO and Cuppl~ent Uo. 1 thereto (improvemeng of Katella ;:venue from Ualnut
Street to the Uest City Limits.
T~
iilefer to Resolution oook.
,% T~ ~ 0 ·
,, ~.EaOL[,TIO,.I OF Tile CITY COUNCIL OF ~-!E CITY OF .~A~TEIM ;.PPilOV~G Ai~D
AU~iO~clZING TIIE EXECUTIOi; OF A LOC~ AGEIICY-STATE MASTER
CITY OF JC~tEIM ~ND THE STATE OF C~IFO~'~IA P~LATING T~ ~DZP~L-AID
SYST~{ PROJECTS IN ~'IE CITY OF JJ~A,{~I~i AI~D I,'~CLUDL~G ~ ~" ~'F
"' ' .... " ' '" ~t,~., CITY., ,A, iIA]II{!]:I CIVIL
XIGiX~ ASSU~NCES.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COLI~CIL }'~MBERS: Kaywood, ~eymour, Pebley~ Sneegas and Tl~om
iIOES: COL~CIL }~[BERS.~ None
ABSZiTT: COL~ICIL ,XiE~ERS: .'.lone
The Nayor declared Resolution No. 76R-100 duly passed and adopted,
~TOP LOSS AND GROUP LIFE I.NSUP~D~CE PROPOSALS: (Councilman Seymour advised' that
he has a' '~0'~ential conflict of 'interest in connection with this matter and
~ould abstain from participating in discussion and/or voting on the issue, on
the advice of the City Attorney.) }tr. Carry McP. ae presented his memorandu~
dated ~farch 2, 1976, recommending that the City Council take the following
actions:
1. Accept the proposal of Northwestern National Life Insurance Company to
prcvide the stop loss insurance effective January 1, 1976 and to provide
cmployee group life insurance (one year guaranteed rate structure) effective
April ~, 1976.
2. Authorize the Assistant City ~anager to sign the applications for the
stop loss and employee group life insurance.
3. Authorize an initial payment to Uorthwestern ~ational Life Insurance
Company of the $2,000 stop loss annual premium and an estimated one mo~.t]~'s
life insurance premium of ~11,000 to secure the coverages on the effective
dates.
4. Appoint the !lal Parker Company, Inc., representinc the Independent
Insurance Agents Association of Anaheim as the broker of record.
Xr. Joe Kerns, vice President of the ~.naheim Police Association, and
>,'r. '~':t,~lley of the A.~..W.E.A. were present and advised that they concur with the
four point recommendation. It was noted that a letter is on file from the
~'~ahein Fire Association also indicating support of the recomr~endation.
~,'r. Kerns added that prior to implementation of any "coordination of
benefits" clause, that the Personnel Department be ~irecte,~ to ~eet and confer
· ~zith the employee groups as to the language of that section.
On ~otton by ~ouncilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council approved the four-point recommendation for stop loss and 7~roup life
insurance, as submitted by the Personnel 9irector. Council. nan Seymour
abstained from voting. ':,qTION CARRIED.
City iiall~ Anaheim~ California - CO~.ICIL MINUTES -}Iarch 2.1 19761 1:30 P,M,
?X:)70.qED I,EASE AGREEI~NT - P~JLTIMODAL GROUP; INC.: At the request .of staff, by
~;ener'al Council consent, the proposed lease of City-oWned property by the
'~ultimodal Group, Inc., was continued. ~
'lE!'~7~f - 7, ICY.CLE TP~AFFIC ON LA PAIA~: In accordance with Councilman Seymour's
request at the meeting of February 24, 1976, in connection with the problem of
~icycle traffic on La Palma, Rio Vista and Sunkist, which was of concern to a
:,u:,ber of gr. Anthony Claret School parents, ~iss Santalahti reported that
evidently l, trs. Yarnovich had investigated the matter and reviewed a con-
struction schedule for Tract Uo. ~866 with the develooer, George Heltzer, and
-~as satisfied that the existing problem would be resolved within a reasonable
len£ti~ ~,f ~ime.
~IL],,~)A?j) - 3100 I~ST LINCOLN AVENUE: (Continued from the meeting of February
?~ 1~7~ pendinE submission of documentation pertaining to the advertising
contract.) The Deputy City Clerk advised that a comnunication dated February 27,
1976, was received from Judge Wisot indicating that the advertising agency
i~: no longer interested in use of this billboard in view of the present situa-
tion, and they will discontinue use and remove same at an early date.
~.': r~ction by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
City Council ordered the billboard located at 3100 West Lincoln Avenue removed
within 30 days (April 1, 1976). MOTION CARRIED.
I!.! BOiID AMO~iT - TRACT SIGNS: Miss Santalahti reported that pursuant to
.Jiscussion held at the Council meeting of February 24, 1976, she had
rev~e~ed the bond requirements and determined that there is a $~.00 bond
rec~r~d to be posted for removal of tract signs and none for billboards. She
a~!z~se~!, that staff has reviewed the matter and has determined that a ~2OO }~ond
provide more encouragement for the developer to remove tract si~s.
.It the conclusion of discussion, it was the consensus of Council opinion
~'~t~ t]~e City. ~.ttorney be directed to prepare a resolution increasing the bond
a-~.o,,~nt for rer,,~oval of tract signs to $200 and that the provisions therefor not
}~e apo!icable to billboards.
o'n"e~"~:.7.' CALEltDAR TT~''!'t°-
............ . ........ : On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman
Peb].ev. , the foil.owing actions were authorized in accordance with the r.e.p, orts
,-.n,.? recor'~.andations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
Calendar ^ '
~ genc~a:
CL?~i.ic ' C~°~' Tile
.~ ~ ,,,.~,~ CITY: ?he following claims were denied and referred to the
insurance, carrier:
a. Claim submitted by Charles A. Schwen for damages purportedly sustained
~tz :: :'_'esult of actions of City Public Utilities workman, on or about Janaury
1~7~
L. Claim submitted by Den-tal-ez ~'~anufac:uring Company, Custom Vacuum
'~ivisio~, for loss purportedly sustained as a result of shut-off of electricity
~y City, on or about ~January 30~ 1976.
c. Clai~ submitted by ilerbert W. Bowen for loss purportedly sumtained a~
a result of overflow of City sewer problem, on or about February 13, 1~76.
;:'~,- ...... , .... .,~.,~b~.,: ~fhe following ~orrespondence was ordered received and filed:
~.. City of Azusa - Resolution ':.~o. 6379 - Urging the National League of
Cities to adopt a resolution requesting federal legislation to correct the
"rate :~queeze" situation in regard to municipal electrical systems and to
provide for preliminary hearings before rare increases are allowed under
,qcction 205 of the Federal Power Act.
b. The Pacific Telephone and Telephone Company - !lotice - ~e Amended
application ~Io. 5.5276 with the PUC.
c. FAC (Alpha) - Minutes - January 27, 1976.
~1. Canyon Area General Planning Task Force - Minutes - February 17, 1.n76.
e. AnaJ-~eim Public Library Board - Itighlights and ~!inutes - January 19,
197~-.
f. Financial and operating reports for the month of January, 1976 for .the
~,nal~cL~ Public Library and Engineering Division.
' ~iO. C,'\RFTED.
76-171
City HallI AnaheimI California - CO~;CIL MIMUTES - }~arch .2.t 1976t 1:30
COP. P. ESPONDENCE - OR~2~;GE COUNTY DIVISION i LEAGUE OF CALIFOPd~IA CITIES:
Correspondence from the Orange County Division, League of California Cities,
describing staffing alternative levels and funding requirements was removed
from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Councilwoman T~.'.ayWood. She advised
that some action is required on the part of Council to indicate their
preference of these alternatives·
Decision was postponed until later in the meeting pending additional
information requested by Councilman Seymour as to the City's dues assessment
from the Intergovernmental Coordinating Council which it has been determined
will be disbanded.
Upon being informed that the City's dues assessment for the
Intergovernmental Coordinating Council was ~5,10~, Councilman ~eymour stated
that if the Council approves Service Level '~o. 3 and required that the League
of Cities take over the activities of the Intergovernmental Coordinatin~
Council, according to the cost breakdown the total charge for the City of
Anaheim would be $5,607.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council indicated they would prefer Service Level ;~lternative ~7o. 3 as sho~,m in
the Orange County Division, League of California Cities description dated
February 17, 1976, with disbandment of the Intergovernmental ~Coordinating
Council and transfer of those activities to the League of California Cities.
~fOTIO'~; CARRIED.
~ooOLUTIOL 1'lOS. 76R-101 AUD 76R-102 Councilman Pabley offered Pesolution los
76~-191 and 76R-102 for adoption in accordance with the reports, recom-
mendations and certifications furnished each Council >{ember and as listed on
the Consent Calendar Agenda:
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTIOi~. UO. 76R-101 - DEEDS OF EASEI.~UT: A RZSOLUTiOI~ CF %U?E CITY COUi'ICIL
OF Ti£E CITY DF ~'~AjlEIM ACCEPTIIiC CERTAI:'~ ~EEDC A]~ID ORDEP. I!IG THEIR PgCORDATION.
(John P. Younkin, e~ ux.; Ross Realty Company; Arthur C, Christensen, et ux.;
Ina V. Cathas, et al.; Alfred R. McDan~el, et ux.; Vera rlanagan Smith; Janet
I.~arie ~itmore; Claude C. Yates; Gregory %Tilliam Liles, et ux.; Good Camaritan
ilospital of O. C.; I~armington Development, Inc.; Lease-All mrangethorpe, a
Calif. Ltd. partnership)
P. ESOLUTION NO. 76R-102 - 170~% ORDER ~'O. 1602: A RESOLUTION OF Tile CITY COUi{CIL
OF TalE CITY OF ~A!IEIM FINDING ;2~D DETER~{I'!Ii~G %fIAT t~J~LIC COIIVEiIIENCE AND
i~ZCESSITY REQUIRE 2qiE COi~STRUCTION A2'ID COHPLETIOi~I OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEi.~NT TO
WIT: START LIGtrf Pd~CONSTRUCTION, fC~AIlEIM CL%~SUE TPACT ~-7~,~ .... , !i~ .... ~h~ CITY OF
~AIIZIM, WOt~% ORDER NO, 1602; APPROVII~G Tile DESI~S, ?LAI!S, PROFILES, DRAI?INGS
Al'ID SPECIFICATIONS FOR TIIE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTIiORIZING TIlE CONSTRUCTION
OF SAID PUBLIC I~PROVE~,'Uf IN ACCORD~2~CE L~ITH SAID PLaY,IS, SPECIFICATIOIIS, ETC.;
AI~D AU~iORIZING AND DIRECTING ~tE CITY CLEPJi TO PUBLISH A iIOTICE INVITING
'SEALED PROPOSALS FOR. Tq{E CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - ?~arch 25,
1976, 2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL }fEMBERS: llaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COIR~CIL ~EMBERS: None
ABSh%IT: COIR~CIL },fEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution l~os. 76R-101 and 76R-102 duly passed
and adopted.
GEU~RAL PL~2-~ A~fENDMENT' NO.. 139 - DATE ~F PUBLIC HEARING: On motion hy Councilman
Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman llaywood, the City Council set General Plan
Amendment No 139 for public hearing on March 23 1976 7'30 P.M. at Fremont
Junior U. igh School. !~TIO~.~ CARRIED.
HO~.~OWNER ~.qZETINCS - LINCOLN ~.D CILBERT APd~A: Councilman Seymour proposed that
meetings take place regarding the property located at the southeast corner of
Lincoln and Gilbert prior to the public hearing on General Plan Amendment
139 which affects this property; participants at said meeting to be the Lincoln
City ilal!.~. AnaheimI California _ COU.'.ICIL MI~tUTES - ,'larCh 2~ lq76, 1:30
and GilLert area homeowners, two members of the City Council, two members of
the Planning Commission, the developer and land owner.
Dy general consent, the Council designated Council Members Thom and
,qay~our to meet with the homeowners and other participants r~garding the prop-
cr~y a~ Lincoln and Gilbert prior to t5e .~{arch 23, 1976 public hearing on
Cenernl Plan Amendment ~'~o. 139·
PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSI.'.,:G BLOCK I',:ALL - UO~.V, ORDER NO. ~65: On the recom-
m. cndation of the City Ensineer, Council.man Thom moved that award of 'Jork ~rder
~o. ~56 be continued one week· Councilman Seymour seconded the motion NOTION
o]~'~'3LUTI.r)i~ NO. 76~-103 - A~.TAP~D OF %~O.~K ORDER ?~0. 772-.,i: In accordance with
.... co:n?erdatior, s of the City Engineer, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No.
7E?-103 for adoption.
.iefer to Resolution Look.
~ ,.: ~qLUiIO~, ()F THE oI~Y COU:ICIL OF TIIE CITY .~F "~ ......
7Of'AL Ai~D A~IAPDING A CONTraCT TO ~IE LO?~ST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR ~IE FUP2~ISi{-
I~]C ~F ~LL PL~C{T, LABOR, SERVICES, ~.~TERIALS .~ID EQUIP~]iiT .... ~D ALL UTILITIES
X~Tl~ 2'~;'SPORTATION, INCLUDING PO~R, ~EL ~ID NATER, ~ID PERFOratING ~L WOOl
~[i~CLSS~.Y TO CONSTRUCT ~']D CO!~LETE ~iE FOLLOI~Si~G PUBLIC IMPROVE}~NT:
GIL.~,~ ST~ET ST~ET IMPROVE~NT, ~OM V~DINA AVENUE ~ !50 ~ET ~/0
,~, V~D !i ~A
A%~'~UZ, ti! %lie CITY OF ~A~I:.~, UORii O~DER NO. 772-A. (Jerry Cross Paving
Co~;'pany, Inc. - $3,430.39)
Xoll Call Vote:
,'.Y-~: COUi~CIL ~-~EP~3ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
~,v,.)':]S: COUi'~CIL ~Z~ERS: None
A3S1X~T: COUNCIL ~MBERS: L'one
· l~... ~.'ayor declared Resolution No. 76R-103 duly passed and adopted.
:%i5OLUTiOi; :i0. 76R-104 - AWARD OF I,~ORK ORDER ~IO. 1261: In accordance with recom-
mendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution
76:~-194 for adopt ion.
Xefer to Resolution Book.
A .q,ESOLUTIO:~ OF %~iE CITY COUi~ICIL OF ~tE CITY OF ~IAt.tEIM ~CCEPTING A SEALED PRO-
PO,qAL ,qSD AWARDING A CONTRACT TO TIlE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR TIlE FUP~IISH-
liIG ~F ALL PLf~,]T, LABOR, SERVICES, }~%TERIALS AND EQUIP}~2';T .M;D ALL UTILITIES
22~D TP~C~SPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, A~ND PERFORMING ALL
:LECESSAP. Y TO CONSTRUCT .~{D COMPLETE ~iE FOLLOR~ING PUBLIC IMPROVEi',~DT: TRACT
'~O. 7569 OFFSITE SEI,~R ACCESS ROAD RECONSTRUCTION, IN TIIE CITY OF ;2~AIIEI}I, 170Pd~
"~"~"'~'~ "~0 1261 (D t'~ Con~racting Company - $6,022 00)
~oll Call VOte:
~,~: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
~()ES: COUNCIL ~MBERS: None
AESZ:'IT: COUNCIL ~-~MBERS: None
The l.~ayor declared Resolution No. 76R-104 duly passed and adopted.
']~d) I; ,L%. ~ CE ~70. 3511: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 2511 for adoption
~,cofer to Ordinance Book.
:~.,~.~,~a nF THE CITY OF ANAtiEIM REPEALING SECTION 1.04.31fi AND ADDING
SZCI~IO:; 1.04.310 TO IIiE 7WIAID~IM ~ruqqlClPAL CODE III ITS PLACE· (Purchasing
Agent - Agencies Served)
qoll Call. Vote:
76-173
City italls,,Anaheim~ ,California - COUNCIL }III~3TES - ~Iarch ,2~ 1976t l:3,q P.iI.
AYES: COUNCIL ~MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and ~om
,'.~OES: COUNC IL }~'~fBERS: ?~one
ABS~.~,; COb~ICIL IZ}fBERS:
Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3511 duly passed and adopted.
,,RDL, A:~uo 'JOS. 3512 AND 3513: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance ~Jos. 3.512 and
3513 for first reading.
OP~DiiL~CE NO. 3512 Ai~ OPd)INAilCE OF ~IE CITY OF ANA~EI,! A,~;'tDI~.~G TITLE 1~ OF
~,n ~IEIM I~NICIP~ CODE RELATING TO ~NING. (71-72-4~. (15), P~-2400)
OPDIN~ICE Y,O. 3513: B2~ ORDIiL%:ICE OF THE CITY OF /C~AIF£IM AI~IDINC TITLE 12 OF
TIlE Af:iAiIEIM MUIIICIPAL CODE P, ELATING TO ZO~'~II,~G. (75-76-13, F,S-A-43,000)
SCAG WO~2SIiOP: Councilwoman Kaywood reported on the $CAG Workshop to ~e held
?'arch 26, 1976 regarding noise elements and new State regulations. She
suggested that Anaheim be represented to state their case for noise mitigation
neasures adjacent to the P~oute 57 Freeway.
~CAG,. 'm~"'IUG~,~ - PgVE?UJE S!I.ARI~,.IG'. Councilwoman Kaywood announced that there will'
be a SCAG Executive Committeemeet~nginWashington, D. C., relative to the.con-,
tinuation of the Federal Revenue Sharing Program. She requested that the City
of Anaheim revenue sharing programs be docunented to be forwarded to SCAG.
~ATIOUAL t%00D Ii~SURAI~CE ACT: Councilman Seymour requested that a history of
events be prepared cataloguing the efforts made by the City of Anaheim to amend
the original Flood Plain Zone :~aps for the City pursuant to the i'Tational Flood
Insurance Act, and further that he be empowered to write to the City's
Congressmen and Senators regarding this problem in preparation for discussions.
to be held while he is in !,~Tashington.
By general consen:, the 'Council concurred with the suggestions proposed by
Councilrmn Seymour.
II~DICAPPED PARI2ING - PEARSON PA~(: Councilman Pebley requested that the three
existing parking spaces on either side of the Lemon Street entrance to Pearson
Park Theatre be converted to two wider spaces and designated for use by the
hand ic ap p ed.
!I;2~DICAP STICiQ~RS: Councilman Sneegas suggested that either the Chamber of
Commerce or some service club in the City undertake a program to distribute
stickers to the handicapped citizens of Anaheim which could be used to identify
their cars so that the Police Department would be able to monitor the user of
parking spaces specifically set aside for the handicapped.
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Sneegas moved to recess to Executive
Session. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. }!OTIO~I CAP, RIED. (~:15
AFTER F~CESS: t~yor Thom called the meeting to order, all ~.embers of the City
Council being present. (4;40 P.M.)
FIVE PERCENT INTERIM SALARY INCREASE- I.B.E.U. ~ A.~.~.E.A. ~ AND ~REPRESENTED
CLASSES: Mayor Thom advised that the Council, in recognition that the negotia--
tions with the A.M.E.A. and I.E.E.W. to date have not been productive, would
like to adopt a posture of good faith, by granting a five percent (5%) interim
wage increase to all Job classifications, represented and unrepresented,
excluding }lanagement classifications (Department and Division lleads), retro-
active to October 17, 1975 when the previous agreement expired. Mayor Thom
stressed that the meet and confer process and negotiations will cOntinue until
agreements are reached and this interim increase is not to be construed as a
se t t !ement.
,,,u~,O,L.U~IO~' NO. 76R-105: Councilman ~om offered Resolution No 76R-105 for
adoption, authorizing a five percent (5%) interim increase to all Job
classifications, represented and unrepresented, excluding Management
classifications, and further authorizing the Accounting Division to do all that
is possible to include this increase on the next payroll check, ,~'farch 12, 1976.
Refer to Resolution Book.
_City }fall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL ?fINUTES - March 2~ 1976~ 1:30
A ~ESOLUTION OF ~IE CITY CObq.TCIL OF T~{E CITY OF ZC]A~IEIM ;I4E'JDIMG ~I..,~D ESTAB-
LISZI;.~G PalTES OF CO}-~E',,.~SATION FOR VARIOUS JOB CLASSES BY GR,~.,,T~JG"' v" A2.] INTERIM
L~C~...~ASE OF FIVE PE~,C~.',~r ~O CLASSIFICATIO~TS ~EPRESE'...ITED BY 7~.!E
....... z~ .... A.o,~. ~IATIO..~, THE II'TTEP3-;ATIOUAL BROT~IER!IOOD OF ELECTRICAL
WORKERS Ai~D CERTAI2.~ ~]REPRESE;~TED EMPLOYEES TO GE ~FFECTIVE OCTOBER 17, 1975.
~oll Call Vo~e:
,--,
i~aywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and ~hom
;Tone
";one
The ~?ayor declared Resolution i'.Io. 76R-105 duly passed and adopted.
'~ayor Thom announced in clOsing that the Council intends to resolve the
i'.:anagencnt and Supervisory class raises as rapidly as possible, however, the
agreements must first be reached ~ith the bargaining units.
ADJOUP..'E'I~T: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Sneegas seconded
the notion. :",OTIOi; CARRIED.
Adjourned: A'45
,\LO~';A ~. ilOUGARD, CITY
Deputy