1976/03/3076-228
City Hall! AnaheimI California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March ~0! 1976~ 1530 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in reEular session.
PRESENT; COUNCIL MEMBERS; Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
ABSEI~: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
FRESENT; CITY MANAGER; Keith A, Murdoch
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY; Alan R. Watts
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Malcolm Slaughter
DEFUTY CITY CLERK: Linde D. Roberts
UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon W. Hoyt
FLA~NING DIRECTOR: Ronald Thompson
STADIUM-CONVENTION CENTER-GOLF DIRECTOR: T. F. LieEler
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti
HOUSING DIRECTOR: Rosario Mattessich
PARKS, RECREATION AND THE ARTS DIRECTOR: James D. Ruth
pERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry O. McRae
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
D~yor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance
to the Council meetin§.
I~OCATION: Reverend Will Smith of the Melodyland Hotline Center gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman John Seymour led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
PROCLA}~TIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Thom and
unanimously approved by the City Council:
"Meals on Wheels Week" - May 9 through 15, 1976.
"Angel Town, California" - April 4 through 10, 1976.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION: A Resolution of Appreciation unanimously adopted
by the City Council was presented to Richard L. Horn by Mayor Thom for donation
of his four-wheel drive jeep :ruck to the City of Anaheim for use as a Police
Emergency Vehicle.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting held
January 30, 1976, were approved, on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by
Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINAIiCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Sneegas moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent
to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after
reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the
reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Seymour seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the
amount of $765,737.00, in accordance with the 1975-76 Budget, were approved.
TOUR COORDINATOR PROGRAM (STADIUM-CONVENTION CENTER-GOLF COURSES): Proposal was
presented by Mr. Liegler for establishment of the position of Tour Coordinator
and installation of a revenue producing tour program. The City Manager's
Office reviewed the program and recommended approval. To insure maximum
revenue potential, it is felt the program should begin almost immediately to
coincide with the baseball season and consequently the City Manager's Office
agreed to allow the Stadium-Convention Center-G01f Director to spend $5,000
during the current fiscal year to provide for a three-month test period, prior
to the beginning of the 1976-77 fiscal year.
Mr. Liegler introduced Miss Cathe Birk who was instrumental in formulation
of this proposal, and she briefly addressed the Council.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City
Council approved the proposal submitted by the Stadium-Convention Center-Coif
Director to establish, effective immediately, a revenue producinE tour program
and to create an additional full-time position in the Stadium-Convention'
76-229
City Hall~ Anaheimt California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30! 1976! 1:,30 P.M.
Center-Golf Department of Tour Coordinator; said activities to be initiated on
a trial basis with review in 90 days. MOTION CARRIED.
MODIFIED ~40RK SCHEDULE - PARKI RECREATION AND THE ARTS DEPARTMENT; Recom-
mendation from James D. Ruth, to initiate a modified work schedule for clerical
personnel at the Park, Recreation and the Arts Department Office, which would
enable this Department to expand operating hours from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m..,
Monday through Saturday, was submitted for Council approval.
Mr. Ruth reported that this proposal has been discussed with both the
Personnel Department and the A.M.E.A. and that it is proposed to be initiated
on a trial basis with evaluation and report to the Assistant City Manager and
City Council at the conclusion of this period.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council approved implementation of the modified work schedule for clerical
personnel in the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department, effective April 2,
1976, for a trial period of 120 days, as proposed by the Director of said
Department. MOTION CARRIED.
STATUS REPORT - BICYCLE TRAILS; In response ko Councilwoman Kaywood's request at
the meeting of March 16, 1976, for report on the status of bike trails,
Mr. Ruth explained that a final copy of the Anaheim Bike Trails Plan was
received from Recreation Land Planners on March 22, 1976 and considerable staff
time will be required for preparation of the evaluation. They currently esti-
mate this will take 30 to 45 days but will attempt to expedite the matter.
Councilman Seymour was assured that grant money allocated for bicycle
trails would not be lost due to'the delay.
REVISED BUDGET FORMAT: Mr. Talley presented an overview of the revisions pro-
posed in the format for presentation of the 1976-77 Budget with comparisons to
the format currently used. Mr. Talley reported that these changes are the
first in a series over the next three years which will facilitate conversion to
a Management by Objectives approach to budgeting, and will permit measurement
and evaluation of each program element in the various City Departments.
At the conclusion of the presentation and discussion of the modified
budget format, Council generally indicated agreement with the changes proposed.
ALLEGED PROPOSITION NINE VIOLATIONS - VOTE COMMITTEE: Mayor Thom recognized
Mr. Bill Ehrle who read a prepared statement charging that the VOTE Committee
is in violation of Proposition Nine for failure to have placed a financial
statement on file by March 4, 1976. Copies of his prepared statement were made
available to City Council Members, City Attorney and press.
In response to the Mayor, the Deputy City Clerk reported that to date, no
financial statement has been filed for the period ending March 4, 1976 by the
VOTE Committee.
Mayor Thom felt the charges were serious and warranted investigation.
The City Attorney advised that it is within his purview to enforce this
provision of Proposition Nine and consequently it would be appropriate that he
look into the allegations presented. He advised he would report back in about
one week,
Mayor Thom requested that Mr. Ehrle be supplied with a copy of the City
Attorney's findings in this matter.
Mrs. Pat Bayley, 801 North Loara, Apartment No. 224, stated that she is
not committed to any candidate, but she wishes to register a protest against
the time spent from the past several Council meetings and again today on this
current subject, when the Council should be handling City business.
Mr. Alan Orsborn, 560 Peralta HiIls Drive, Anaheim, 92807, echoed
Mrs. Bayley's remarks and urged that instead of political rhetoric, the Council
Chamber be graced with integrity and the meeting conducted in a manner which is
exemplary to the youth of the community.
76-230
C.ity Hall; Anaheim~ .Cal..if0rnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30; 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
PUBLIC ~iEARINC - ABANDONMENT HO. 75-9A: In accordance with application filed by
Lynn E. Thomsen, public hearing wa~ held on the proposed abandonment of a
public utility easement located at the north side of Carleton Circle, west of
Dwyer Drive, pursuant to Resolution No. 76R-111, duly published in the Anaheim
Bulletin and notices thereof posted in accordance with law.
Report of the City Engineer was also submitted recommending unconditional
approval of said abandonment.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no
response, he declared the hearing closed,
RESOLUTION NO. 76K-139~ Councilman Seymour offered Resolution Mo. 76R-I3~ for
adoption, approving Abandonment No. 75-9A.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF ~E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION
f~ND ABAndONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. (75-9A)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-139 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC t~ARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-25 AND VARIANCE NO. 2783: Applica-
tion of D & T Leasing for a change in zone from CL and RS-A-43,000 to .~fL and
the following Code waiver to expand an existing manufacturing facility located
at 2144 West Ball Road, was submitted together with application for negative
declaration status from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact
report:
a. Minimum required landscaping.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-38, recom-
mended that subject project be declared exempt from the requirement to prepare
an environmental impact report and further recommended that Reclassification
No. 75-76-25 be approved, subject to the following conditions.
1. That sidewalks shall be installed along Ball Road as required by the
City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file
in the Office of the City Engineer.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road for street lighting purposes.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60 cents per front foot along Ball Road for tree planting purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hYdrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framing.
6. That :he number and location of driveway accesses to Ball Road and the
traffic circulation pattern shall be subject to the approval of the Traffic
Engineer, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
7. That the use of the subject property shall be limited to the
manufacture of golf carts or similar industrial electric and gas-powered
vehicles and related wheel and accessory equipment.
8. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 2 and 6, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the
City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
9. That Condition Nos. ! and 4, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-39, granted
Variance No. 2783 in part, approving waiver for "0" feet of landscaping within
76-231
City Hall, Aha. helm; California - COUNCIL M.IN. UTES- ~{.arch 30~... 1976~ 1:3,0 P.~,.
the required se:back area adjacent :o the planned highway right-of-way provided
however, that said required 10-feet of landscaping shall be provided elsewhere
on the property, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 75-76-25, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with the plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit No. 1 and 2; provided, however, that precise landscaping plans shall be
submitted for Planning Commission approval prior to the issuance of a building
permit, said plans to show 10 feet of landscaping adjacent to the front of the
buildings, as stipulated to by the petitioner; and, further, that the number
and location of the proposed driveway accesses to Ball Road and the traffic
circulation pattern shall be submitted to the Traffic Engineer for approval, as
stipulated to by the petitioner.
The Deputy City Clerk reported on correspondence received from Fred and
Suzanne Miller, adjacent property owners, dated March 25, 1976.
Miss Santalahti described the location of subject property, surrounding
zoning and land uses, and briefed the evidence from the Planning staff report
submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present and wished to
address the Council.
Mr. Davis Taylor, 406 Fernhill Lane, Anaheim, displayed a rendering of the
proposed plant expansion. He advised that they will continue the same
architectural design and structure as on the existing plans. He reviewed the
planter areas proposed in accordance with the landscaping plans which have been
submitted. He advised that they will remove the existing older residential
structure on subject property.
Mr. Taylor referred to the three stipulations imposed by the Planning Com-
mission on the approval of this petition and noted that two of these stipula-
tions, relating to the number of driveways and planter areas have been met by
his firm; they have agreed to a reduction from 7 to 4 driveways and have sub-
mit ted landscaping plans for the planter areas. He stated that the third
stipulation, limiting the use permitted to the manufacture of golf carts or
similar industrial electric and gas powered vehicles and related wheel and
accessory equipment places them in a difficult position inasmuch as there are
very few golf cart manufacturers in the Country and lending institutions are
unwilling to grant construction loans for facilities with such severe limita-
tions. He requested that Council grant the ML zoning in accordance with the
list of 17 uses permitted on the remaining portion of the property (as shown in
City Council Resolution No. 69R-311).
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, Miss Santalahti explained that the
City Planning Commission rationale for the strict limitation of use was because
of their overall concern that the site was not suitable for certain industrial
uses. This particular use was acceptable and they therefore felt this was the
one way to restrict the use of the property to Taylor-Dunn.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone wished to address the Council, either in favor
or in opposition to the proposed reclassification and variance.
Mrs. Suzanne Miller, owner of the adjacent property, indicated no
objections to the construction proposed, but requested, for the purposes of
privacy and protection, that the Taylor-Dunn Corporation be required to con-
struct a six-foot block wall adjacent to their property line. She noted that
there is a residential structure to the rear of her property which she and her
husband may occupy at some future time, and they would require the block wall
for privacy. She also requested that a limitation be placed on the expansion
of the building so that there will be sufficient parking spaces in the future.
The Mayor asked if anyone else either in favor or in opposition wished to
address the Council; there being no response, be declared the hearing closed.
Mr. Davis Taylor advised that they plan to erect an eight-foot chain-link
fence to separate their property from Mrs. Miller's parcel and offered this in
76-232
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30~ 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
place of the six-foot ?ioc~: wal_~ requested. }.Ir. Taylor also noted that
Mrs. Miller's property Js zoned CL.
At the conclusion of Council discussion, it was determined appropriate
that the applicant erect the eight-foot chain-link fence and install wooden
slats in said fence to resolve the visual intrusion problem into the adjacent
parcel. Mr. Taylor agreed with this solution.
ENVIRO~fENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
'§"eymour, second'~d by Councilwoman ~a'ywood, the City Council finds that this
project will have no significant effect on the environment and is, therefore,
exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. ~'.IOTION
CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 7_6.R-!.40: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-140 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission with amendment to Condition Nos. 7 and 9 to read as follows:
7. That the applicant file deed restrictions permitting only the
following uses:
1. Architectural, engineering, research and tenting firm~ and
laboratorles.
2. Bakery, wholesale.
3. Bottling plants.
4. Garment manufacture.
5 · Laundry.
6. Mail order f~rm.
7. Motion picture studios, laboratories and film processing.
8. Newspaper establishments.
9. Photo-engraving, photo-copying, photo-processing and blue
printing.
10. Printing establishments.
11. Radio broadcasting studio or station.
12. Shoe manufacture.
13. Telephone exchange, studios, offices and equipment buildings.
14. Television broadcasting studio or station.
15. Wholesale business, storage buildings and warehouses.
16. The manufacture of golf carts or similar industrial electric and
gas powered vehicles and related wheel and accessory equipment.
17. Other uses as may be approved by the City Council.
9. That Condition Nos. i and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections; and further provided that the
owners of subject property shall construct an eight-foot chain-link fence with
wooden slats along the westerly property line except in the front -~etback.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETEP~{INL~C
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM 'AUNICIPAL CODE PJ~LATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT T~tE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CRANCED. (75-76-25,
~L)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL M~MBERS: !~ywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL M]ZMBERS: l,lone
ABSENT: COUNCIL TfEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-140 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-141: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-141 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2783 in part, subject to the conditions recom-
mended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TlIE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO.
2783.
76-233
City Hallt Anaheimt Califor.n. ia - C. OUNCIL MINUTES -Hatch 30; 1976t 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES; COUNC IL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL }fEMBERS: Hone
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-141 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC REARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-21; Application initiated by the
Anaheim Planning Commission for a chan~e in zone from CL to CO on property
located at the southwest corner of Ball Road and Empire Street, was submitted
together with application for exemption status from the requirement to prepare
an environmental, impact report.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-37, reported
that the Planning Director has determined the proposed activity falls within
the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to
the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to file an environmental impact
report and further recommended unconditional approval of Reclassification ~io.
75-7 6-21.
Miss Santalahti reviewed the location and murrounding land uses and zoning
of subject property.
There were no Council questions.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor
or in opposition to the proposed reclassification; there being no response, he
declared the hearing closed.
F2IVIROL~fENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman
Sneegas, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council ratified the
determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within
the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to
the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to file said environmental impact
report. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-142; Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 76R-142 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, changing the
zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A PJ~SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERHIND]G
TitAT TITLE 18 OF ~tE ANAHEIM ~CUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SIIOULD BE
AHYANDED A~D THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SIIOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-21,
CO)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-142 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC. HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION Ii0. 75-76-26 AND CONDITIONAL USE PEP~iIT
1,375 (READVERTISED).' Application by Anaheim Memorial Hospital Association for a
change in zone from RS-7200 to CO (Parcels A & B) to allow expansion of an
existing hospital parking lot located north of La Palma Avenue, east of Euclid
Street, was submitted together with application for exemption status from the
requirement to prepare an environmental impact report.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-40, reported
that the Planning Director has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 11, of the City of Anaheim Guide-
lines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare said report, and further
76-234
Ci_ty Hal~le Anaheime California - COUNCIL MINWTES -March 30; 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
recommended approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-26, subject to the following
cond it ions:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street
along La Palms Avenue for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along La
?alma Avenue, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of
all improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, ~treet sradin~ and
paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work, shall be complied with
as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; that street lighting
facilities along La Palms Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director
of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file in the Office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an
amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the
City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
3. That a modified cul-de-sac shall be provided at the terminus of
Hermosa Drive subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
4. That the owner(s) shall initiate abandonment proceedings for La Palma
Circle and for the cul-de-sac at the easterly end of Hermosa Drive.
5. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by :his resolution shall become null and void by action of the
City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
6. That Condition Nos. 3 and 4, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-41, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 1375, readvertised, subject to the following
condit ions;
1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion
of Reclassification No. 75-76-26, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
No. 1.
Miss Santalahti briefed the surrounding land uses and zoning and advised
that the applicant intends to increase the number of parking spaces to 737
total; site screening from adjacent residential properties would be provided
with a 6-foot block wall reduced to 30 inches in ~he front setback; landscaping
will be provided in a 25-foot wide planter area on La Palma Avenue with a
minimum 10-foot wide planter adjacent to the interior property lines.
There were no Council questions.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the
Counc il.
Mr. Randy Bosch 'of Dan Rowland and Associates, 1000 West La Palma,
Architects for the Hospital Association, advised that although they had met
parking requirements for the office and adm~nistration building in addition to
the hospital use, since that time, due to increased occupancy of the building
and its designation as a base hospital for the County Paramedics System, the
parking area is insufficient. Therefore the Hospital Association has made this
application to rezone these two parcels, to be used for parking purposes. In
addition they will relocate the main driveway to align with Lido Street, south
of La Palma Avenue to ease traffic congestion further.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either in
favor or in opposition; there being no response, he declared the hearing
clos ed.
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT: On motion by Councilman
Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council ratified the
determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within
the definition of Section 3.01, Class 11, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to
the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
76-235
City Halls Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30~ 1976t 1:30 P.M.
categorically exempt from the requirement to file an environmental impact
report. MOTION CARRIED.
2ESOLUTIO:~ NO. 76R-143: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 76R-143 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, chan~ing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City PlanninE
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDI~G A~D DETERMININC
THAT TITLE 18 OF TI~E A~AIIEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATI~;G TO ZONING StlOULD BE
A~IE~ED AND TtlAT TIlE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-26,
CO)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES; COUNCIL MEMBERS; Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, £neegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL ~EMBERS: None
ABSENT; COUNCIL ME~BERS; None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-143 duly passed and adopted.
P. ESOLUTION NO. 76R-144: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 76R-144 for
adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1375, readvertised, subject to
the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU~!CIL OF Tt[E CITY OF AC~At{EL'{ GRANTING COI~DITIOI:AL
USE PEP~{IT NO. 1375.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL ME~'iBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Eneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL ~MBERS: None
ABSE~Ff: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ?~one
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-lA4 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - AMEND}~NT TO HOUSING ASSISTanCE GOALS: To consider amendments
to the Housing Assistance Goals contained in the Housing Assistance Plan of the
City's First-Year Community Development Block Grant Application.
Mr. Mattessich explained that the proposed amendment would increase the
City's Section 8 Housing Assistance Goals in the First-Year Application from
200 units new construction and 300 units existing construction to 400 and 600
units respectively, with the following percentage breakdown: elderly - 300;
large families - 50; other families - 250.
?Ir. Mattessich offered to answer any questions Council or the public might
have.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council relative to the
proposed amendments to the First-Year Housing Assistance Goals; there being no
response, he declared the hearing closed and announced that a second public
hearing on this matter would be held April 6, lq76, 2:30 P.>!.
R~tEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 54-55-12~ (READVERTISED~: Application of Robert
E. and Richard S. Bentley was resubmitted for deletion of two conditions
contained in the City Council resolution and ordinance approving CL zoning for
property on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, between La Plaza and Cemetery
Road as follows:
1. That there be no entrances on Cemetery Road.
2. That that portion of Lot No. 4 used for parking purposes shall be
fenced along Cemetery Road with a three-foot ornamental fence to enclose the
parking area.
76-236
City llallI Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MI~HITES - March 3~; 1976; l:3,q
Tile City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution bio. PC76-10, recom-
mended denial of the requested changes and conditions.
Public hearing was held before the City Council on February 17, 1976, at
~ich time, pursuant to Resolution ~Io. 76R-6&, the City Council upheld the City
Planning Commission recommendation of denial and also ratified the deter-
mination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within the
definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the
requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from :he requirement to file an environmental impact
report.
On February 24, 1976, the City Council granted a rehearing subject to pay-
ment of a $50 fee to defray publication costs and public hearing was scheduled
this date.
Mr. Robert Bentley, 433 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, submitted a plan
(labeled Exhibit "A") indicating that he proposes to retain the existing chain-
link fence located on the portion of his property adjacent to Cemetery Road,
and to install concrete footings along the rest of the fence where there are
none currently. In addition, he proposes to install 5 tree wells, 15 feet
apart, and plant 15-gallon eucalyptus trees along this property line.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Mrs. Howard Stanton, 1498 East Birch Street, Anaheim, reiterated that her
concern is that this fence not be removable as this has caused difficulties for
the adjacent residents in the past. (The applicant's plot plans were shown and
explained to Hrs. Stanton.)
Mayor Thom explained that the chain-link fence with footings would be a
permanent installation and this, together with the tree wells would effectively
block ingress and egress to Cemetery Road from Mr. Bentley's property.
Mrs. Stanton further requested that a sign be posted at the corner of
Lincoln Avenue and Cemetery Road indicating that Cemetery Road is not a through
street and further that a "no parking" sign be posted for Cemetery Road. She
described the difficulties encountered with vehicles using Cemetery Road and
the alley.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being
no response, he declared the hearing closed.
By general consent, the City Council concurred that it would be
appropriate to post both "not a through street" and "no parking" signs on
Cemetery Road and directed staff to proceed with such signing.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-145: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 76R-145 for
adoption, amending Resolution No. 4264 to indicate that the plan submitted and
marked Exhibit "A" is deemed to meet Condition No. 2 originally set forth in
said resolution, i.e., for this purpose, the chain-link fence is construed to
be an "ornamental fence".
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETEP, HI~IING TiiAT TI~E
PLANS SUBMITTED AND MARKED EXHIBIT "A" gRE DEEMED TO HEET CO}IDITION NO. 2
ORIGINALLY SET FORTH II~ RESOLUTION NO. 4264 OF RECLASSIFICATION NO. 54-55-12.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSEI~: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The }~yor declared Resolution No. 76R-l&5 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINanCE NO. 3520: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance ~Io. 3520 amending
Ordinance No. 963 for first reading.
76-237
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California.- COUNCIL MINUTES - ~,~eh 30.1 1~761 1:3~ P.M.
A~2 ORDINANCE OF FIE CITY OF A~At~IM A~IBIMC ORDINANC~ l. lO. ~g3 IN RELATI6T~ TO
RECLASSIFICATION 54-55-12 BY C}iaJqGING CONDITION NO. 3 TIIEREOF PERTAINING TO
ZONI.~G.
RECONSIDERATION~ S0.LICITATION PE~fIT - tLdNDS OF GOD HINISTRY: Request of
Reverend R. H, Hands, The }lands of God '~ini's'tr'y,'Inc., 617 Lincoln Boulevard,
Venice, Cali~ornia, 90291, for reconsideration of the City Council's denial of
permit for door-to-door solicitation, originally considered February 24, 1976,
was submitted.
Reverend Hands addressed :he Council describing the charac:er of their
work as entirely religious and not charitable and that they work primarily with
rehabilitated drug addicts who have been converted. He explained that their
solicitation approach involves no pressure but rather the distribution of
religious literature, for which a small dona:ion is requested. The largest
donation generally received is 25¢. Reverend Hands stated that as a truly
religious organization, ~hey feel ~he Constitution permits them the freedom to
practice and share their beliefs.
Mayor Thom explained that because of the reaction of the citizens of
Anaheim to door-to-door solicitation, it has been the general policy of the
Council to deny permits to organizations which are not local, (local defined as
housed within the City of Anaheim or a local chapter of an organization in the
City).
Mr. Watts agreed with Reverend Ilands that to the extent his organization
wishes to pass out religious literature, they need no permit of any type fro~
this City. However, to the extent that they request donations therefor, it is
his opinion that the group does need a solicitation permit.
Councilman Sneegas offered a motion to approve the requested solicitation
permit for The Hands of God Ministry, Inc., however, said motion died for lack
of a second.
By general consent, the Council upheld their previous position, denying a
permit for door-to-door solicitation to The fiends of God Hinistry, Inc.
FI%]A/~CIAL SUPPORT - CINCO DE .MAYO FIESTA: Request of Margarita L. Maes, for
financial assistance from the City for the Cinco de Mayo Fiesta to be held
~fay 1 and 2~ 1976, in La Palma Park, was submitted together with memorandum
from the City Attorney's Office recommending said request be denied.
Mr. Watts explained that the reason for this recommendation from his
Office is that the event is privately sponsored and, further, because a
religious service is planned in conjunction with the Fiesta.
Council Members however pointed out that the City has assisted such
privately sponsored events as the Halloween Parade and Pacific States Band
Review and felt that the rationale in this situation is similar, that it is a
community promotional event which attracts a large number of individuals to the
City and is an advertisement of the community.
Mr. Uatts responded that on this basis, if Council desires to provide
financial assistance, this should be accomplished by entering into a contract
agreement with the Fremont Junior High School Title I Program Committee
sponsoring the Fiesta, indicating that the funds be used for certain specific
purposes and including a proviso that no portion of the funds would be used
toward any part of the religious activity.
Councilman Thom moved that the City Attorney's Office be directed to
prepare a contract agreement with Fremont Junior High School Title I Committee,
to provide a maximum of $1,500 from Community Promotional Funds to be used for
specific expenses of the Cinco de Mayo Fiesta, to be outlined in said agree-
ment. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
By general consent, Council Members also indicated they would be agreeable
to providing further assis:ance in the form of printing flyers, brochures,
etc., by the Cityls Printing and Duplicating Division.
RECESS: The Council recessed for ten minutes. (4:00 P.H.)
76-238
City HallI Anaheim; California - COUNCIL ?{INUTES - March 301 !9761 1:30. P.){.
AFTER RECE§§: Mayor Thom called the meetin§ to order, all Members of the City
Council being present. (~:10 P.M.)
PROPOSED AGREEME~IT - CITIZF2.~S RECREATION ASSOCIATION~ INC.: Consideration of the
proposed agreement with the Citizens Recreation Association, Inc., submitted by
Harry Barnes was continued to the meeting of April 6, 1976, on motion hy
Councilwoman ¥~ywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour. ~IOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Seymour lef: the Council Chamber. (4:11
FINAL MAPI TRACT NO. 7587: Developer, Anaheim Hills, Inc.; tract located south
of Serrano Avenue, southwesterly of ~{i~den Canyon Road; .containing 34 proposed
RS-HS-22,000 zoned lots.
The City Engineer reported that said final map conforms substantially with
the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been forwarded to the City
Attorney for approval and required fees paid. The City Engineer therefore
recommended approval of said final map, subject to the following conditions,
with Condition ~']o. 1 being completed prior to the City Clerk's certification of
the map:
1. That the petitioner shall make some provision acceptable to the City
Council for the landscaping and maintenance of the slopes within and/or created
by the development of this property as required in the original conditions of
Tract No. 7587.
2. That the southerly 30 feet of Avenlda Santiago be improved to full
roadway width on private property and maintained as a private roadway until
such time as annexation to a city.
3. That the petitioner enter into a Special Facilities Agreement with the
City of Anaheim l~'ater Division for Tract No. 7587 prior to the City providing
utilit les service.
Mr. James Barisic, representing Anaheim }~ills, Inc. indicated that said
conditions were acceptable.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman ]~aywood, the
proposed subdivision, together with its design and improvement, was found to be
consistent with the City's General Plan, and the City Council approved Final
Map, Tract No. 7587 as recommended by the City Engineer. Councilman Seymour
temporarily absent. MOTION CARRIED.
CONSENT CALEndAR ITP{S: On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman
Pebley, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports
and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
Calendar Agenda:
1. CLAIMS AGAIMST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to
the insurance carried:
a. Claim submitted by Karen S. Killingbeck for fatal injuries sustained
by her husband and property damage suffered purportedly as a result of
condition at interseCtion of Orangethorpe Avenue and Lakeview Avenue, on or
about December 20, 1975.
b. Claim submitted by Glen duBruyne for damages purportedly sustained as
a result of actions of agent of Anaheim Police Department, on or about
February 28, 1976.
c. Claim submitted by Michael Scherer for losses purportedly sustained as
a result of welding operation on City vehicle by City of Anaheim personnel, on
or about March 2, 1976.
2. CORRES~O~IDENCE; The following correspondence was ordered received and
filed'.
a. School Traffic Safety Committee - Minutes - March 11, 1976.
b. Anaheim Public Library Board - Highlights/Minutes - February 17, 1976.
c. PAC (Alpha) Committee - Minutes - March 9, 1976.
d. Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission - Minutes - February 19, ]~76.
(Councilwoman Kaywood requested these be corrected to show she was present at
the meet lng.)
r
76-230
City }IalltAnaheim~ California - COUi'ICIL MINUTES -}.{arch 3fl~ 1976~ 1:3~ P.M.
e. Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission/Cultural Arts Commission -
}{inures (Joint ~eettng) - February 11, 1976.
f. Financial and operating reports for the month of February 1076 for the
City Treasurer~ Public Library and Engineering Division.
g. OCTD Board of Directors ~eeting -M~nutes -March 19, 1976.
3. CHANCE ORDER NO~ l~..!~P/Z. ORDER NO. 2286: Change Order No. 1, Work Order
No. 2286 (Utilities Service Center Phase IV), increase of $9,632.75, bringing
the total contract price to $246,472.75, was authorized.
Councilman Seymour temporarily absent. ~-~OTION CARRIED.
Councilman Seymour returned to the Council Chamber. (4:15 P.M.)
GAMING PRI~4ISES PERMIT: Application for Gaming Premises Permit submitted by
Martin M. Gertler, Regency Anaheim, 1253 West Lincoln Avenue, for a social and
recreation card room with 20 tables was removed from the Consent Calendar a~
the request of Mr. James Spring, 820 North Patton Street, Santa Aha, Attorney
for Mr. Gertler.
Mr. Spring requested notwithstanding ~he recommendation of the Chief of
Police for denial, that the Council consider ~ranting the permit as requested
on the basis that there is a card room in operation in the City of Anaheim
which is identical to the operation proposed by Mr. Gertler.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City
Council denied the Gaming Premises Permit Application submitted by Regency
Anaheim, 1253 West Lincoln Avenue, in accordance with the recor~r~endation of the
Chief of Police. MOTION CARRIED.
In response to Mr. Spring's request for a reason of this denial, two
Council Members indicated that they based their decision on the recommendation
of the Chief of Police ~ich is, in turn, based upon his determination that the
grantin5 of this application would be contrary to the general welfare and best
interests of the citizens of Anaheim.
RESOLUTION i~OS. 76R-146 AND 76R-147: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution
:~os. 76R-146 and 76R-147 for adoption in accordance with the reports, recom-
mendations and certifications furnished each Council Member and as listed on
the Consent Calendar Agenda.
Refer to Resolution Hook.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-146 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO~CIL
OF %/{E CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTinG CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING TtlEIR RECOP. DATION.
(American National Properties, Inc.; Joel B. Goldberg; Ghazi J. and ~aJan J.
~ustafa; Proland AG; Five Coves; Gene A. Albin, Sr., et ux.; Franklin L. Brown,
et ux.; John F. Vogel, Jr., et ux.; Edna R. Kahlen, et al.; Joe R. Ojeda, et
al.;Jacqueline R. Ferreira; David L. Proctor; et ux.; Olive ?~. Irwin; George F.
Itaney, et ux.)
PdZSOLUTION NO. 76R-147 - ENCROACHMENT PERI-~IT NO. 75-7E; A EESOLUTION OF TIiE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CO}~DITIONS OF AN
ENCROACI~NT PERMIT AND AUTHORIZI~,:G TIlE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID
ENCROACHMENT PER}fIT %~TH ROBERT UA~E k~IITEtlEAD (75-7E). (Encroachment upon a
portion of an existing 8-foot public utility easement at 617 South Valley
Street)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL I,[EMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-146 and 76R-147, duly
passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-148 - AUTHORIZATION TO OBTAIN CRIMINAL HISTORY INFOP~QkTION:
In accordance with report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman
Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-148 for adoption.
76-240
City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - ~larch 30t 1976t 1;30 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTIIORIZING TItE CHIEF
OF POLICE TO OBTAIN STATE SU~MARY CRIMINAL ItISTORY INFORMATION FROM TIlE
ATTORNEY GENEPJkL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR DISSEMINATION TO DESICNATED
CITY OFFICIALS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COLR~CIL ~MBERS: Ymywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COLR~CIL M~ERS: None
ABS~,~T: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~1one
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-148 duly passed and adopted.
~EORC~IZATION OF HOUSING COMMISSION; By general consent the City Council deter-
mined that it would be appropriate to amend the City ordinance establishing the
Housing Commission to provide for a seven member commission rather than five
members as currently constituted.
AUTHORIZATION - ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS: Memorandum from the Utilities Director
dated March 18, 1976, recommending that the City Council authorize issuance of
$6 million in electric revenue bonds was submitted.
Mr. Hoyt reviewed the terms and conditions as outlined in the resolution
authorizing the sale of $6 million of electric revenue bonds from the ~150
million approved by the electorate on }~arch 4, 1975. These will be 30-year
bonds issued at competitive bid. It is hoped that the interest rate will b.e in
the area of 6.5%. lie reviewed the differences between this proposed bond issue
and the 1972 issue. He reviewed the potential list of generation, transmission
and distribution projects which would be included in the $6 million bond issue
as set forth in the }'~arch 18, 1976 memorandum. }te-stressed that in all cases,
the money is uncommitted, and each specific project or use would be subject to
Council approval.
In response to Councilman Seymour's question as to the City's position
should the $6 million in bonds be sold and then the projects for which these
bonds were issued did not proceed for whatever reason, Mr. Watts explained the
general rule relating to arbitrage provided by the Internal Revenue Service is
that if the bond funds are not utilized for the purpose intended within three
years, they become subject to arbitrage provisions. If, however, it can be
demonstrated that the City has taken diligent steps toward finding replacement
projects, this time period might be extended.
Mr. Joe L~ite, 809 South Broadway, Anaheim, was recognized by the ~'~ayor
and stated his opposition to the use of $3 million in bond funds for expansion
of the City's distribution system as proposed because this constitutes, in his
opinion, deficit spending. He remarked that he did not think this was the
intent for issuance of the bonds.
Brief discussion was held between Mr. Itoyt and Council ?~embers relative to
the use of bond funds for capital improvements in the City's distribution
system.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-149: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-149 for
adopt ion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION OF TILE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE OF $6,000,000 ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS OF SAID CITY ;diD PROVIDING
~IE TEP~fS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SAID BONDS. (Issue of 1976)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL ~lEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, and Sneegas
NOF~: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
ABSE~Cf: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-149 duly passed and adopted.
76-241
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL..MINUTES - March 30; 1976; 1.:30 p.M.
Mayor Thom advised that he has opposed these electric bonds from their
inception inasmuch as he did not think they were honestly represented to the
public; he stated that he does however recognize the public's acceptance of the
bonds and consequently supports the investment of bond money in generation
facilities. IIowever he will not vote for approval of any portion of the bond
monies which do not go directly into a generating plant.
RESOLUTIOI~. NO. 76R-150 - AGP~EE}[ENT - ATCHISON; TOPEKA ;~ND SANTA FE RAILWAY
dOll';uNY - C'~RRITOS AVENUE: (NO. 2 - 169.7) Councilman Thom offered Resolution
No. 76R-150 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A P£SOLUTION OF ~tE CITY COUNCIL OF T!i~ CITY OF A~A/IEII{ APPROVING TIIE T7.?CIS OF
~'~ AG~E~NT I.~TH ~E ATCtlISON, TOPEt~ ~ND SANTA FE ~ILUAY COMP~IY
CONNECTION ]~Ttl STF~ET ~DENING ~2~D INST~TION OF CROSSING PROTECTION DEVICES
AT CERR~OS AV~. (No. 2 - 169.7)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Eneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL }~MBERS: ~:one
ABSE~: COUNCIL }-~EMBEtIS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-150 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-151 - AE~AHEIM BOULEVARD-ILASTER STREET OVERCROSSING OF S~;TA
FREEWAY - AIIFP NO. 779: In accordance with the recommendation submitted by the
City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 76R-151 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF 1%{E CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAIIEIM REQUESTING TI~ COLrE'~TY
OF OR~/]GE TO CAI~CEL ~JtTERIAL HIGtBfAY FINANCING PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 779.
(Anaheim Boulevard - Haster Street Overcrossing of the Santa Ana Freeway)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL ~E}fBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL ~MBERS: None
ABS~T: COUNCIL M~MBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-151 duly passed and adopted.
A/{ENDMENT TO P.E.R.S. CONTRACT: ~:r. Garry O. McRae presented the proposed
resolution of intention to amend the P.E.R.S. contract to provide final
compensation on the basis of one year (instead of three) for miscellaneous
and/Or safety members.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, Hr. McRae advised that this amendment
will cost the City $106,000 per year for the miscellaneous members and $136,000
per year for the safety members out of a total retirement budget of $4.275
mil lion.
Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-152 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF LNTENTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDb[ENT TO CONTRACT BE~.;EEN TIlE BOARD
OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIRE~.~NT SYSTEM AND TI~ CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHELM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ymywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABS~T: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-152 duly passed and adopted.
76-242
City Hall; Anaheims California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30~ 1976~ 1:30 F.~.I.
R~.SOLUTION NO. 76R-153 - WAGE RATE§ - UNREPRESENTED JOB CLA~§ES~ PART TI~:
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-153 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI~ CITY OF A2~AHEIM ESTABLISHING RATES OF
COMPENSATION FOR PART-TE{E CLASSES, AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 75R-104 ;2qD
A~P.IDME~TS I~IERETO. (Average 4.6% increase, effective March 19, 1976)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL }~ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, ~qneegas and Thom
NOES: COU}~CIL ~MBERS: ~one
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-153 duly passed and adopted.
MOI{T!ILY PREMIUM RATES - RETIRED .EMPLOYEES IN .!~ALTH PLkN: The following recom-
mended rate structure"for retired employees in the Employee Health Plan was
submitted by the Personnel Director:
Under A~.e 65:
Retired Employee only - $23.00 per month
Retired Employee and One Dependent - $59.00 per month
Retired Employee and Family - $76.00 per month
Not Under A~e 65:
Retired Employee or Dependent over age 65 enrolled in ,'.Iedicare - $13.00
per month
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council approved the monthly premium rate structure for retired employees for
the 12-~onth period January 1, 1976 through December 31, 1976 as recommended by
the Personnel Director. I[OTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-154 - MODIFYING SALARY SCI~DULE - FE'~Ai~CE DIRECTOR:
Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 76R-154 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF I~{E CITY CO~CIL OF TttE CITY OF A2~AHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION iiO.
74R-555 AND MODIFYING T~ SALARY SCIIEDULE FOR Ti~ CLASSIFICATION OF FINA/~CE
DIRECTOR. (Effective March 19, 1976)
Roll Call Vo~e:
AYES: COU~CIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL I.~MBERS: None
I~%e Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-154 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-155 THROUGH 76R-157 - RATES OF COMPENSATION - POLICE AND FIRE
PERSONNEL: Councilman Thom offered Resolution Nos. 76R-155 through 76R-157, both
inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-155: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR JOB CLASSES REPRESENTED BY TIlE
ANAHEI}! POLICE ASSOCIATION, A~ND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 75R-563. (Effective
April 2, 1976)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-156: A RESOLUTION OF TItE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING P~ATES OF CO.~PENSATION FOR JOB CLASSES REPRESENTED BY T}~
AI{A/{EIM FIRE ASSOCIATION, AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 75R-564. (Effective
April 2, 1976)
76-243
City HallI _Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30; 1976~ 1:30
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-157: A R~.~OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T}Z CITY OF
~NAHEiM ESTABLISHING' RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR DEPUTY FIRE MARSIIAL, FIRE
BATTALION CHIEF AND POLICE LIEUTENANT JOB CLASSES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION
74R-521 AND 74R-522 AND RESC]2IDING RESOLUTION NO. 75R-593. (Effective April 2,
1976)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL I~MBERS.. None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS; None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-155 through 76R-157, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-158 - ESTABLISHING JOB CLASSIFICATION - TOUR COORDI/~ATOF,;
Councilman Pebley of'~ered Resolution }lo. 76R-158 for adoption, establishing a
new Job classification of Tour Coordinator and allocating said position to
Compensation Schedule X644.
Refer =o Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF %/{E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A~A}IEIM ~JiE.~ING RESOLUTION NO.
74R-520 ESTABLISHING A NEW 3OB CLASSIFICATION. (Tour Coordinator, $918.67 -
$1,116.27)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSElrf: COUNCIL ~MBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Ho. 76R-158 duly passed and adopted.
SOLICITATION OF C/{ARITY FUllS: Request of the Community Crusade Against Drugs
and Disease for permit to solicit door-to-door, continued from the meeting of
March 23, 1976, pending additional information, was resubmitted together with a
letter received from Carl B. Watts, Pastor of the Seventh-Day Adventist Church
at 900 South Sunkist Street, Anaheim, indicating their support of the Com~nunity
Crusade Against Drugs and Disease.
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Thom, a
solicitation permit was granted to the Community Crusade Against Drugs and
Disease for a period of 60 days in accordance with Chapter 7.32 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code. MOTION CARRIED.
}..CJLTIMODAL TRAI~SPO.RTATION C.ENTER LEASE PROPOSAL (MULTIMODAL GROUP! Ii~C.):
Mr. Murdoch presented the proposed Multimodal Group, Inc., lease together with
a cover memorandum dated March 26, 1976 and financial projections based on
assumed Multimodal Center activity. He briefed the contents of the memorandum
(on file in :he Office of the City Clerk).
Mr. Murdoch reported that since ~he lease itself does not give the City
the cash guarantee which has been indicated to be a favorable consideration, a
condition precedent to approval of execution of the lease has been prepared as
follows: that there shall be presented to the City Manager acceptable plans
for the platform complex, excluding all commercial development; and a deposit
of $300,000 in escrow a~ an independent depositor, to insure completion of said
platform complex; in-lieu of this deposit, an irrevocable financial commitment
in the sa~ amount ($300,000) issued by a lender acceptable to the City shall
be considered to satisfy this requirement. This presentation must be made on
or before May 15, 1976, otherwise the lease aEreement must be returned ~o the
City Council for further action. Mr. ~lurdoch recommended, if Council is
satisfied with the terms and conditions of the lease agreement~ that the
resolution approving same be adopted with the condition precedent to signing
the lease as outlined here and above.
Mr. Everett Byler, representing the Santa Fe Railroad, reported that
station pla~s have been prepared and reviewed by Amtrak and the Santa Fe
76-244
City Hall; AnaheimI California - CouNcIL MINUT.ES - March 30; 1976, 1:30 P.M_~.
Railroad and meetings held at the site. All e££orts are being made to ~rin$
service to the Anaheim site on .June 15, 1976.
Mr. Joe %~ite, 809 West Broadway, Anaheim, voiced his concern over this
lease, based on the disapproval of i~ by a local group three months ago. It
was understood that Multimodal Group, Inc., would reappear before that group to
answer questions relative ~o their proposed plans, however this was never
ac compl ished.
At the invitation of Councilman Seymour to ask whatever questions he might
have on the proposal at this time, Mr. White inquired about the parking situa-
tion and in particular, if a parking structure were required, who would be
responsible to pay for same.
Mr. Murdoch explained that the contract between the City and the
California Angels calls for 12,000 parking spaces and there are spaces in
excess of that number at the Stadium now. The Multimodal lease proposal will
retain the provision for these 12,000 spaces intact, nevertheless, a provision
has been added to the proposed lease agreement to protect the Angels' parking
specifically. In addition there is a joint use capability and a provision that
Multimodal, or the Transportation Fund, or a combination of both, has the
responsibility o£ assuring that 2,285 parking spaces are available at all tir~es
for Multimodal use as well as the Stadium use and must replace any parking
stalls which are not available because of construction or other development on
the property.
Councilman Seymour requested that staff imagine the heaviest impact which
could be placed on both uses simultaneously and project how the situation might
be resolved. -
Mr. Watts responded that this is one of the purposes for the establishment
of the Transportation Center Fund, and that either additional property would be
sought for acquisition or a parking structure might be considered, lie reported
that there would be created an Advisory Committee to recommend on
appropriations from the Transportation Fund.
Councilman Seymour pointed out that this lease will provide a financial
vehicle for a source of revenue to meet the future long-term transportation
needs of the City without using any tax monies. He noted that even in the
worst situation, i.e., if the project does not move past point "A" - the train
platform itself - the City will receive, in exchange for the development
rights, the platform which is valued at $300,000.
Mayor Thom concurred with Councilman Seymour's remarks and further pointed
out that this will be the most positive reinforcement to the City's redevelop-
ment efforts.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-159: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-159 for
adoption, approving the lease with Multimodal Group, Inc., subject to the
condition precedent to the lease as recommended by the City Manager.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF %1{E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TEPeeS AND
CONDITIONS OF A TRANSPORTATION CENTER DEVELOPMENT LEASE AGREE~fENT BETWEEi? THE
CITY OF ~2~AItEIM AND MULTI~ODAL GROUP, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF A~AHEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL }fEb~BERS: None
ABSEITr: COUNCIL ~MBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-159 duly passed and adopted.
REQUEST FOR REI~ARE~G - VARIANCE NO. 2780: Request of Gerarde Warde, Oranco
Construction, 4332 East La Palma, for rehearing of Variance No. 2780, public
hearing for which was held on March 16, 1976 and denied by the City Council
pursuant to Resolution No. 76R-121, was submitted. Said variance would allow
76-245
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - ~areh .30~ 1976~ 1:30 P.~.!.
certain Code waiverm and would permft the establishment o~ a large equ{pment
rental yard in the ~ (SC) Zone on property located at the southwest corner of
La Palina Avenue and Lakeview Avenue.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City
Council granted a rehearing on Variance No. 2780, subject to payment by the
applicant of a $50 fee to defray publication costs. ~{OTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pebley left the Council Chamber. (5:35 P.M.)
P~ESOLUTION NOS. 7~6R-160 AND 76R-161 - AWARD OF UOR/% ORDER NOS. 773-B AND 1602:
In accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Sneegas
offered Resolution ~os. 76R-160 and 76R-161 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
PJZSO.LUTION NO. 76R-160 - WOPJ~ ORDER NO. 773-D; A EESOLUTIO~ OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF I~{E CITY OF iNAHEIM ACCEPTI!~C A SEALED PROPOSAL A/~D AWAP~ING A
~W~lTM
TRACT TO TltE LO%,~ST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR TIIE ~URNISttlI]G OF ALL PLA..~,, LABOR,
SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMEI!T AND ;AL UTILITIES AND TP~P~SPORTATION, E'TCLUD-
E'~G PO~R~ FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFOI~III~:G ALL WOR/. !iIECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT
COi'~LETE ~IE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IHPROVE~NT: TIIE LAKEVIEI7 AVEI.;UE STPdZET
E'iPROVEMENT, I~ THE CITY OF ;~]AI~IM, WORK ORDER i'~0. 773-B. (R. J. I;oble
Company - $4,569.80)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-161 - UORK ORDER ~O. 1602: A P~SOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COLq.;CIL
,,
OF ~{E CITY OF A~AHEI~! ACCEPTE]G A SEALED PROPOSAL ;/~D AWAP~Ii;G A CO~ITP~ACT TO
%lie LONEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR T!~ FUPCIISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES,
I~IATERIALS AI{D EQUI~r A1;D ALL UTILITIES AND TRA~SPORTATION, INCLUDING POI,~R,
FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL I~ORK ~;ECESSARY TO CO.~ISTRUCT A2~D C~OLPL~E ~ =' Tt!E
FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVE~.fENT: STREET LIGHT RECONSTRUCTION, A?~;AHEIM CEi?£UE
TP~ACT ~.~873, E.~ THE CITY OF A~]AHEI~.[, UOPJ'. ~RDER ~.IO. 1602. (Steiny and Company,
Inc. - $15,870.00)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COL~.~CIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: l;one
ABSENT: COUNCIL ~%MBERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-160 and 76R-161, duly passed
and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3517: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance ~'~o. 3517 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
A2~ ORDII;AI;CE OF THE CITY OF A~N~IM A}~NDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM >f0NICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-25 (3), RS-5000)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL !~MBERS: Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood
ABSE~Ff: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3517 duly passed and adopted.
ORDE~NCE NOS. 3518 AND 3519: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance 7'Ios. 3518 and
3519 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINanCE NO. 351-9: AN ORDINANCE OF T}~E CITY OF ANAttEI}{ AMENDINC TITLE 18 OF
TIlE AN;RhEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (74-75-40, CO (SC)
ORDINA/~CE NO. 3519; ~ ORDIN~2~CE OF TIlE CITY OF ANA]IEIM A~{Ei~DING TITLE 18 OF
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZON]2~G. (66-67-61 (6C), C-11)
Roll Call Vote:
76-246
City Hall.~ Anaheim~ Ca!ifqr.n.ia - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 30~ 19761 1:30 P...~J..
AYES: COUNCIL ME~BERS: Kaywood, P~blay, Snaagag .,md Thom
NOES: COUNCIL }.~MBERS; Uone
ABS~IT COUNCIL ME;.~BnRS Pebley
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 3518 and 3519, duly passed and
adopted.
OXDIi4~NCE NO. 3521; Councilman Sneegas offered Ordinance No. 3521 for first
reading.
;~.: ORDINANCE OF T%tE CITY OF ANA/HEIM ;J{E~IDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM ~NICIPAL
CODE RE]2%TING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (69), CK)
SUPPORT - ROBIiI YOUNG~ OCTD BOARD OF DIRECTORS VACANCY: On motion by
Councilwoman tCaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council adopted
a position of support for the appointment of Mayor Robin Young of La Habra to
the OC.~D Board of Directors and directed that notification of said position be
forwarded to the Orange County Division, League of California Cities.
Councilman Pebley absent. ~OTION CARRIED.
DISCUSSION - ACCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC }~ETINGS BY THE PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED;
Brief discussion was held between Council ~embers and staff regarding the
accessibility of the Council Chamber to physically handicapped citizens
desiring to participate in public meetings.
At the conclusion of discussion, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by
Councilnmn Seymour, the City s~aff was ins:ructed ~o investigate the cost of
making the City Hall building accessible to the physically handicapped to the
extent the: ~hey would be able ~o arrive a: the Council Chamber without human
assistance other than their own.. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
COI~RtITTEE APPODITMENTS:Councilwoman Kaywood commented that there are various
SCAG and Orange County League of Cities Committees which require the
participation of duly elected officials from the member cities. She suggested
that all members of the Anaheim City Council make themselves available to serve
on these committees.
By general consent, the Council determined the matter of appointments to
committees would best be held over pending the outcome of the General ~unicipal
Election to be held April 13, 1976.
APPOIh'f.'.~rr - GOLF COURSE CO}~ISSION: On mo:ion by Councilman Seymour, seconded
by Councilman Thom, Mr. Marty Herling, 945 .North Summer Street, 'Anaheim, was
appointed to the Golf Course Commission, replacing Julio Macedo. Councilman
Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess to Executive
Session. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. Councilman Pebley absent.
MOTION CARRIED. (6:00 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Hayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Members of the City
CounCil being present with the exception of Councilman Pebley. (7:00 P.M.)
ADJOURNM.riNT I~ MEMORY OF EDLriN KOUPAL: Mayor Thom called attention to the recent
passing of Mr. Edwin Koupal. He outlined some of Mr. Koupal's accomplishments
in the forming of the initiative petition process and requested that the
meeting this date be adjourned in memory of Mr. Koupal, with appropriate
notification to his family.
Councilman Seymour moved to adjourn. Councilwoman Xaywood seconded the
motion. Councilman Pebley absent. ~OTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 7:04 P.M.
ALONA ~I. HOUGARD, CITY CLERK