1976/04/2776-288
City Hallt Anahe~nt California - COI~CIL HINUTES - April 271 197,61 1:30 P.H.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTOILNEY: Alan R. Watts
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linde D. Roberts
UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon W. Hoyt
PAR~$, RECREATION AND THE ARTS DIRECTOR: James D. Ruth
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry O. McRae
PLANN~C DIRECTOR: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR; Annika Santalahti
FIRE CHIEF: James Riley
POLICE CHIEF; Harold Bastrup
CITY ENCINEER: James P. Maddox
SCIENCE ADVISOR: Dr. Owen Grifflth
DISASTER SERVICES COORDINATOR: Paul Hayes
Mayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance
to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Reverend Randy Rhodes of the Melodyland Hotline Center gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman John Seymour led :he Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
PROCLAMATIONS t The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Thom and
unanimously approved by the City Council:
"Respect for Law Week" - May 1 through 7, 1976.
"Cultural Arts Month" - May, 1~76.
Mrs. Eileen Anthony accepted the latter proclamation on behalf of the
Women's Division of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. In turn she presented
Council Members with copies of the booklet "Original Paintings of Anaheim
Landmarks" published in celebration of America's Bicentennial by.the Women's
Division of the Chamber of Commerce.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held March 23,
197'6, Were approved, with the following corrections, on motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour:
Page No. 76-221 - second paragraph, place period after the word "complex"
and strike the rest of the sentence.
Page No. 76-222 - fourth paragraph, change Anaheim Savings to Hom Savings
and Loan.
Page No. 76-226 - third paragraph, complete last line with the phrase "use
without planning eonsideration."
Council Members Kott and Roth abstained. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances 'and resolutions, and that consent
to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after
reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the
reading of such ordinance or resolution. Council~,~ Thom seconded the motion.
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST T~E CITY; Demands against the City in the
amount of $637,547.66, in accordance with the 1975-76 Budget, were approved.
AWARD O~ ~6 .MILLION ELE~..~EIC REVEKUE B~DS: Mr. aoy~ reported that sealed bids
~are opened this date for the $6 million Electric Revenue Bonds, Issue of 1976,
the first series of the total issue of $150 million, authorized by the voters
in 1975. The lo, bid received was that of Blyth Eastman 9illon & Company at
6.0670% in~eres~. Since the Bond Buyer Index currently stands at 6.59%, Mr.
Hoyt pointed out that this bid is a good reflection on the City. Mr. Hoyt
76-28~
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 271 1976~ 1.'30 P'M'
recommended that the $6 million bonds be awarded to Blyth Eastman Dillon &
Company in accordance with their proposal dated April 21, 1976, opened April
27, 1976 and further recommended adoption of the resolutions certifying the
Official Statement and appointing paying a§ents in San Francisco and Los
Angeles, California, Chicago, Illinois and New York, New York.
In response to Councilman Kott, the City Attorney advised that there is no
question under Proposition "A" approved by the voters that the $6 million issue
is, in fact, a legal issue. This will be attested to in an opinion from the
City Attorney, as well as from Bond Counsel O'Melveny and Myers, which will
accompany delivery of the bonds. The City Attorney summarized that proceeds of
the funds will be used to pay for various generation studies and also for
extensions of the electrical distribution system, which purposes are legal and
valid under Proposition "A".
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution Nos. 76R-204 through 76R-206, both
inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
CI. TY OF ANAHEIM - RESOLUTION....NO. 76R-204: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA AWARDING $6,000,000 ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS OF
SAID CITY TO THE BEST BIDDER AND REJECTING ALL OTHER BIDS. (Blyth Eastman
Dillon & Company, 6.0670%)
CITY OF ANAHEIM - RESOLUTION NO. 76R-205: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA RE OFFICIAL STATEMENT.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-206: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING PAYING AGENTS FOR $6,000,000 ELECTRIC REVENUE
BONDS, ISSUE OF 1976.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTA~IED; COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kott
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: }lone
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-204 through 76R-206, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY PROPOSAL - FINANCIAL AUDIT AND IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW:
Letter dated April 8, 1976, from Arthur Young & Company describing their pro-
posal to audit of the City's financial statements of June 30, 1976, and to
review implementation of the recommendations presented by them in the
Management Practices Audit recently completed, was submitted.
In response to Councilman Seymour's request for clarification as to the
cost of the implements:ion review segment of :he proposal, Mr. Haidinger
explained that this would be broken down into three phases: 1) a brief review
of each of :he City Departments; 2) the performance of whatever work they
would be directed to perform by the Steering Committee in connection with their
findings; and 3) participation in limited fashion with City Management in
developing a Management by Objectives Program. He estimated that this would
require 20 hours Der department and the eo~t would r~nge hetw. en g20,O00 to
$30,000 dependent upon the direction given by the Audit Steering Committee.
Councilman Seymour noted that the Arthur Young & Company would present
work plans for approval by full Council prior to each engagement.
Councilman Roth voiced his concern over this proposal to expend funds in'
addition to the $375,000 already paid to Arthur Youn8 & Company as a
consultant, noting that this appeared to him to be a "hunting and fishing
expedition, hunting for work and fishing for problem areas". He further noted
that the City organization includes a City Manager and Assistant City Manager,
as well as Department Heads, who should certainly be capable of impleanenting
those Arthur Young & Company recommendations which are of value to the City.
76-290
City Hallt Anahelmt California - COUNCIL MINUTES -April 27t 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Seymour agreed that it is a "hunting and fishing expedition" co
the extent that it would be a cooperative search to find, identify and assist
the City employees to implement more effective and less expensive ways of
delivering services. 'He stated that he felt as long as Arthur Young & Company
shows a return to the taxpayers of 10 to 15 times their fee in savings, it is a
good deal for the City.
In response to Councilman Kott, Councilman Seymour adVised that in his
opinion the Arthur Young & Company's engagement would Be considered complete
when their recommendations no longer produce savings of at least twice their
fee and that these activities would be closely monitored by the Assistant City
Manager to insure that the savings are realized.
In further response to Councilman Kott, it was clarified that the
reference in the proposal letter that the reviews would be performed by meeting
with senior personnel was not meant to preclude them from speaking with other
personnel, but to assure that departmental managers are included in the dis-
cussions with the Steering Committee, as was not always the case during the
Management Practices Audit.
With respect to the financial audit, Councilman Roth questioned whether
anx bids were solicited or received from other accounting firms, and Mr. Talley
explained the rationale was that utilizing the same firm for an additional year
would be beneficial, and the price quoted is considered competitive with fees
charged by the larger accounting firms.
Both Council Members Seymour and Thom voiced the opinion that for
financial audits and accounting systems, it behooves the City to have the best
possible, as this will ultimately save the taxpayers money as evidenced by the
excellent financing obtained for the recent $6 million bond issue.
Councilman Seymour moved that the City Attorney be directed to prepare a
contract to employ Arthur Young & Company in the relationship and capacities
described in the letter proposal dated April 8, 1976 and as discussed by the
Council at this meeting. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. Councilman Roth
voted "no". MOTION CARRIED.
AIR POLLUTION EMERGENCY EPISODE PLAN: Mr. Paul Hayes reported that the plan sub-
mitred was prepared in response to directives of the State and Federal Govern-
sent, i.e., the EPA and State Resources Board, to meet requirements of Regula-
tion No. 7 of the Southern California Air Pollution Control District that any
company or employer employing over 100 persons at one location prepare and
submit an emergency episode plan. This plan described minimum actions to be
taken by the City government related to its own activities and employees in the
event of the declaration or forecast of a first, second or third stage air
pollution episode.
..RESOLUTION NO. 76R-207: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-207 for
adoPtion'~ with modification to Page No. 4, last line, wherein reference to the
Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.04.06(c) should read 6.04 06 03, striking the
"(c)". ' '
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AIR
POLLUTION EMERGENCY EPISODE PLAN AND AUTHORIZINC THE 5tAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE SAID PLAN.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-207 duly passed and adopted.
BUS..INESS AND INDUSTRY SAFETY AWARDS - 1975: Mayor Thom presented the following
safety awards, a program sponsored by the Greater Los Angeles Chapter of the
National Safety Council - Governmental Agencies Division:
7f~. 2 91
ClOy Hall, AnaheimI California -COUNCIL MINUTES -.Apri!. 2.7a. 1976e !:30 P.M,
First Place - Anaheim Fire Department, accepted by Fire Chief Riley.
Second Place - Ceneral City Administration, accepted by William O. Talley.
Third Place - Anaheim Police Department, accepted by Chief Bastrup.
ENVISTA - ENERCY. MANACEMENT PROGRAM:. (California Innovation Group) Dr. Owen
GrlfflCh presented the proposed agreement with Envista, Inc., thr~ughwhieh the
City of Anaheim would participate as a member of the California Innovation
Group in a program involving an audit of energy uses in the City and develop-
ment of an energy management plan. The cost of this study is not to exceed
$5,000 and is fully funded by HUD and the FEA (Federal Energy Administration).
Dr. Griffith explained in reply to Councilman Kott tha~ the end pro~uct of
chis study would be an energy conservation management plan which the City could
use on both a short- and long-term basis.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-208: Councilman Roth of£ere~ Resolution No. 76R-208 for
ad o pC ion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AN~IM APPROVING AN AC,~~
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND ENVISTA, INC., RELATING TO C(~SULTING SERVICES
FOR THE CALIFORNIA INNOVATION GROUP URBAN MANAGMENT
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Ro~h and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-208 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-209: On report and recommendation of Dr. Griffith,
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 76R-209 for adoption.
Refer Co Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXPRESSING ITS DESIRE
TO PARTICIPATE IN AN INNOVATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE FIELD OF'
GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OF THE
CITY OF SANTA CLARA TO FILE AN APPLICATION ON ITS BEHALF FOR A BLOCK GRANT
PURSUANT TO TITLE V OF THE HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1970.
(Title U - HUD)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kote, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSE}Vf: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-209 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-210 AND 76R-211 - PERSONNEL: On report and recommendation, of
the Personnel Director, CounCilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution Nom. 76R-210
and 76R-211 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-210: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CXTT OF
ANA/{EIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 74R-521 AND MODIFTING THE SA_~Y SCHEDULE
THE CLASSIFICATION OF COMPUTER OPERATIONS MANAGER. (Schedule XllI3, ef~ec~ive
April 30, 1976)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-211: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Crl"f OF
ANAHEIM' AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 74R-520 AND MODIFTIN~ A JOB CLA~ TO BEC~ AN
UPGRADE POSITION. (Data Processing Scheduler, Schedule 728, effective Ap~il
16, 1976)
76-292
tit7 Halle A~aheimm Califor~ia : ,COUNCIL, MINUTES, ,- Apri! 12,71 1976,I !=30 P.M,
Roll Call Vote=
AYES= COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kenwood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-210 and 76R-211, duly
passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-212 - REVISED CONTRACT - STATE PERSONN~. BOARD.' (Technical
Personnel Services Inciden~ to Written Examination Development)" Councilman
Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-212 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A REVISED
CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, RELATING TO
TECHNICAL PERSONNEL SERVICES INCIDENT TO WRITTEN EXAMINATION DEVELOPMENT AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION THEREOF BY THE CITY PERSONNEL DIRECTOR.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-212 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-213 -APPLICATION~ GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVE!4FNT CRA};T:
(Title V of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970.) On report by Mr.
Talley that this grant would create a planning package model for street
modification improvements for the City of Anaheim which is transferable to
other cities of similar size, Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 76R-213
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR A GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT
UNDER TITLE V OF THE HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1970 RELATING TO
INNOVATIVE PROJECTS PROGRAMS IN LOCAL PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEME}~f. ($18,000 in-
kind services to be provided by City)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-213 duly passed and adopted.
AGREEMENT - ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR PARK CONTROL BUTL~INCS - ALLEN AND MILLER:
(Schweitzer, Rio Vista and Juarez Parks) Mr. Ruth reported that contractual
agreement has been prepared following negotiations with the firm of Allen and
Miller to perform architectural services for the design of three park control
building facilities at a fee not to exceed $8,000. Additional funding from the
State Bond Act will be available for construction of these buildings, which
COSt iS estimated at $100,000.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-'214: Councilwoman Ka~ood offered Resolution No. 76R-214
,, ·
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE'CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZINC THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEHENT WITH ALLEN AND MILLER TO PERFORM
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF PARK BUILDINCS IN SCHWEITZER, RIO
VISTA AND JUAREZ PARKS. (Not to exceed $8,000)
Roll Call Vote:
76-293
City Hall; Anaheim, California -..,COUNCIL MINUTES - April 2.7, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, KotE, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL ,MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-214 duly passed and adopted.
EMPLOYMt~T - CHARLES SCHULTE - "AMERICAN FOLK TALES": (Held over from the
meeting of April 20, 1976 for full Council.) Mr. Ruth advised that this
contract agreement provides for Mr. Schulte to produce 17 performances of
"American Folk Tales" at various elementary schools as a portion of a program
which has been in existence for three years. The estimated cost is ~9,465.00,
of which one-third would be absorbed by the School Districts.
_RESOLUTION NO. 76.R-215: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 76R-215
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TItE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
A}ID THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF CHARLES
SCI~LTE, tN INDIVIDUAL.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, k'ott and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS; None
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Roth
ABSE.~f ~ COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Ilo. 76R-215 duly passed and adopted.
E}fPLOYEE EXCHANGE PROGRAM - PARICS, RECREATION A~ND T~-!E ARTS DEPARTMENT: Mr. Ruth
explained the proposed Employee Exchange Program with the Southeast Park and
Recreation District in the City of Norwalk, which would permit the
Superintendent of Recreation to be assigned to said District for a period of 30
days beginning April 26, through May 21, 1976. He reported that a letter has
been received from the Southeast Park and Recreation District indicating agree-
ment to the conditions set forth for the exchange, i.e., that the City of
Anaheim would continue to provide the salary and basic benefits and assume
liability.
Councilman Kott inquired how Mr. Ruth felt this proposal related to the
Arthur Youn~ & Company recommendation on Management by Objectives.
}(r. Ruth replied that he is familiar with the operations in this
particular District and that they have defined their objectives and goals and
developed planning calendars and other methods to implement Management by
Objectives. He felt that the exposure of the Recreation Superintendent to
these operations would be very helpful in development of such a goals-oriented
system in his Department.
On motion by Councilwom~n Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
City Council authorized the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Director to execute
a letter agreement with the Southeast Park and Recreation District for a 30-day
pilot Employee Exchange Program as recommended. MOTION CARRIED.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-2~ VARIANCE NO. 2733 AND
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 156: Application of Raymond Spehar for a change
in zone from RM-1200 (SC) to CL (SC) and the following Code waivers to con-
struct a commercial shopping center north and .east of the northeast corner of
La Palms Avenue and Imperial Highway was submitted together with E.I.R. No.
156.
a. Permitted display surface of a shopping center identification sign.
b. Minimum building setback.
c. Prohibited roof-mounted equipment.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-213, recom-
mended that the Council certify E.I.R. No. 156 as being in compliance with the
76-294
City Hall; Anahelm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 27, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
.... iiiii
California Environmental Quality Act and further recommended approval of
Reclassiication No. 75-76-2, subject to the following conditions~
1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along
Imperial Highway, La Palma Avenue, and Street "A", including preparation of
improvement plans and ins~alla:ion of all improvements such as curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, street grding and paving, drainage faeilitie~, or other appurtenant
work, shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City
Engineer; that street lighting facilities along Imperial Itighway, La Palma
Avenue and Street "A" shall be installed as required by the Director of Public
Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in
the Office of the Director of Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount
and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to
guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
2. That th~ owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60 cents per front foot along Street "At' for tree planting purposes.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Uorks.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framing.
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject property shall he disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
7. In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose of
sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved division of
subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and
then be recorded in the Office of :he Orange County Recorder.
8. That completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of Variance No. 2733.
9. That appropriate water assessment fees, as determined by the Director
of Public Utilities, shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
10. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 7, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provi-
sions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action
of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one (1)
year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
11. That Condition Nos. 3, 5, and 6, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-214, granted
approval in part of Variance No. 2733, waiver "b" being unnecessary, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 75-76-2.
2. That subject property shall be developed precisely in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos.
1, 2, and 3, provided, however, that plans and specifications for screening of
the roof-mounted equipment shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Said public hearing was continued from the meetings of April 6 and 20,
1976 at the request of the Applicant. Copies o~ the staff report to the
Planning Commission were supplied to Council Members previously and the details
of said report were summarized by Miss Santalahti on two separate occasions,
consequently Council declined further report on the staff findings.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the
Count il.
Mr. Horace Camp, 1234 East Lincoln Avenue, advised that the previous post-
ponemants were requested to give Council Members an opportunity to visit a
similar project in Riverside. He advised that the applicant requests approval
of his petition for CL (SC) zoning on that portion of the property located at
the northeast corner of the intersection and that the balance of his property
be retained in its present zone classification of RM-1200.
76-295
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL HINUTES .- April 271 19761 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Seymour reported that he had visited the project in Riverside
which is only 45 feet from the railroad tracks and spoke with a number of the
tenants and the manager. In his opinion there was obviously no objection to
living that close to the railroad tracks as evidenced by the rental schedule he
was shown indicating that the average length of tenancy was one to one and one-
half years. He noted that these particular units were built five years ago and
that he would imagine sound attenuation measures on the new project would be
substantially improved. Furthermore he noted that the apartment project to be
built on the applicant's property would be located 100 feet from the railroad
tracks. Therefore, Councilman Seymour remarked that he would be satisfied if
given some assurance that the ~ound requirements can be handled on the proposed
apartment project and that vibration such as was experienced on the second
floor of the Riverside project will not take place in these proposed units.
Dr. John Hilliard of Bio-Acoustics advised that these apartments will be
more than 100 feet from the centerline of the nearest tracks and it has been
repeatedly demonstrated that areas less than 100 feet are subject to vibration
which has led to regulations that structures be required to be removed a
minimum of 100 feet from railroad tracks. He outlined some of the noise
mitigation measures planned ~r this project and advised Councilwoman Kaywood
that the carport walls will be 50 feet from the centerline of ~he railroad
tracks and there will be an additional 51 feet from this sound wall to the
apartments for a total of 101 feet which should control the vibration problem.
Mr. Bob Sant of IPS, 1095 North Main Street, Orange, presented a report on
soil conditions at the subject site prepared by Kenneth G. Orsborne &
Associates, dated April 26, 1976, reporting that it is their opinion the
existing railroad track will have no adverse effect on the stability of the
proposed structures. He referred Council Members to another similar apartment
project which his firm hn~ under c¢~nstruction in Brea which is adjacent to the
Orange Freeway and the railroad tracks.
In response to Councilman Se~our's request for a professional opinion as
to whether or not one would feel vibration on the second floor of subject
project when complete, Dr. tlilliard replied that he saw no reason to believe
this would be so.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either in
favor or in opposition to the proposed reclassification and variance; there
being no response, he declared the hearing closed.
CERTIFICATION - ENVIRONME?IT~J~ I>{PACT REPORT NO. 156: E.I.R. No. 156 having
'been 'reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the City Planning Commission
to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of California
Environmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such information and
belief does hereby certify, on rao~ion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by
Councilwoman Kaywood that E.I.R. No. 156 is in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-216; Councilman Seymour offered Resolution ~]o. 76R-216 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commis s i on.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A P~§OLUTION OF TlS CITY COm~CIL OF THE CITY OF ANfd4EIM FINDII'TO AND DETERMINI?~G
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE AN;dlEIM >~K~ICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
A}~,~DED AND T}LiT TIlE BOU/.~DARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-2,
c,,., ('sc))
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: CO~;CIL MEMBERS: ~[aywood, Seymour, ]',ott, P~th and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL }~MBEES; None
ABSE~f: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The ~ayor declared Resolution No. 76R-216 duly passed and adopted.
76-Z96
City_Hal. l! Anaheim! California - COUNCIL MINUTE8 - Aprll 27t 1976t 1~.30 F.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-Z17; Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-217 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2733, in part, waiver "b'l being unnecessary,
subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer ~o Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TItE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO.
1733, IN PART.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-217 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION ~:0. 75-76-24 AND VARIANCE NO. 2791 -
, ,,
CO~CrINUATION: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood,
application of Lowell W. Hauck for a change in zone from RS-7200 to CL and for
certain Code waivers to establish a commercial office at 2183 Niobe Avenue was
continued to the meeting of May 25, 1976 as requested by the applicant. MOTION
CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-22; VARIANCE N?. 27791 CONDITIONAL
U. SE PERMIT NO. 1602 "AND ENVIkONMENTAL 'IMPACT REPORT NO. 166. 'Application of
Anaheim Hills, Inc., for a change in zone (Portion A) from RS-A-43,000 (SC) to
RS-5000 (SC) and the following Code waivers to permit a six-unit model home
complex and to establish a 214-1ot, 210-unit subdivision (Portions A and B) on
the south and west sides of Nohl Ranch Road, easterly of Anaheim Hills Road,
was submitted together with E.I.R. No. 166, supplementary to Master E.I.R. No.
80.
a. Minimum lot width.
b. Requirement that single-family lots rear-on arterial highways.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-52, recom-
mended that E.I.R. No. 166, supplementary to Master E.I.R. No. 80 be certified
as being in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and
further recommended approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-22, subject to the
following conditions;
1. Tha: trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public %!orks.
2. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framing.
3. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site,
su/ficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on
grading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be
borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties through subject property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall Be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement
agreements may~be made available to the' developers of subject property upon
their request.
4. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm
water originating or flowing through this project.
76-297
City HallI AnaheimI Cal:Lfornta - COUNCIL HXNUTF,.5 - Apr'l__~ 271 .1976,... 1=3..0 p.M.
5. Thac the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
6. Thac a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the O££tce of the Orange
County Recorder, prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property. The provisions or rights sranted by this resolution shall become
null and void by action of the City Council unless said condition is complied
with within one year from the date hereo£, or such further time as the City
Council may grant.
7. That completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of Variance No. 2779.
8. Thac the roofs of all structures shall be constructed of non-
combustible material as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
9. ThaC Condition NOSe 1, 3, 4, and 8, above-mentioned, shall be complied
~rith prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-53, granted
Variance No. 2779, subject to the following conditions;
1, Thac this Variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 75-76-22, nov pending.
2. That subject proper~y shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City o£ Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution NO. PC76-5&, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 1602, subject to the following conditions:
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
2. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framin§.
3. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
4. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed, of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
5. That public utility easements shall be granted as required by the
Director'of Public Utilities.
6. That this Conditional Use Permit shall remain in full force and effect
~or a period of two (2) years from the date hereof or until all of the homes in
Tract Nos. 9212, 9213, 9214 and 9215 are initially Sold, whichever occurs
first, or such further time as the Planning Commission and/or City Council may
granC.
7. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shall be posted with the City to guarantee the removal of the models in the
event the final maps of Tract Nos. 9212, 9213, 9214 and 9215 are not recorded,
said bonding to be complied with prior to the commencement of the activity
au=horized under ~his resolu=ion or prior co the time cha~ the building permit
is issued, or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs
first, or such further time as the Plannin$ Commission and/or City Council may
grant.
8. That subject, property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1 and 2.
9. That Condition Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8, above-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior co final building and zoning inspections.
Miss Santalahti briefed the Council on the surrounding land uses and
zoning and reviewed the findings submitted to .and considered by the City
Planning Commission.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent vas present and vished to
address the Council.
Mr. James Baldwin, 16811 Hale Avenue, Irvine, aesuredCouncilwoman Ka~ood
that they intend to retain all oak trees on this site with the exception of
some mall scrub oak in the canyon areas. He advised that their proposal
reduces the density from 560 units as shown on the Anaheim Hills plan to 210
76-Z98
City HallI Anaheiml California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 27; 1976! 1:30 P.M.
units; that all grading would be in conformance with the City's Revised
Hillside Crading Ordinance; that there are 29 acres out of 92 which will be
dedicated to permanent open space. The slopes would be contoured and
landscaped with natural vegetation. The roofing material for the proposed
project is concrete tile.
During brief discussion addressed to the County's responsibility for main-
raining this open space area, Mr. Watts counseled that this responsibility
would most likely be set forth in the conveyance documents of that property to
the County or in an asreement in some form between the developer and the
County. Councilman Seymour wished the record to be clear that approval of
subject zonin§ petitions and/or tentative tract maps does not constitute any
agreement on the City's part to maintenance of the 29 acres of open space
located on subject site.
ENVIRONI.m-NTAL IMPACT P, EPORT NO. 166 - CERTIFICATION; Environmental Impact
Report No. 166, supplementary to Master E.I.R. No. 80, having been reviewed By
the City staff and recoznended by the City Planning Commission to be in
compliance with City and State Cuidelines and the State of California Environ-
mental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such information and belief
does hereby certify, on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman
Kaywood that E.I.R. No. 166, Supplementary to Master E.I.R. No. 80, is in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City and State
Guidelines. MOTION CARRIED.
XESOLUTION NO. 76R-218: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-218 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions reco~ended by the City Planning
Commiss ion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONI/{C SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-22,
RS-5000 (SC))
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth, and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-218 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION. NO. 76R-219: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-219 for
adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1602, subject to the conditions
recommended by the City Planning Comission.
R~fer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 1602.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSE~rf: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor' declared Resolution No. 76R-219 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTIpN...~O. 76R-220: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-220 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2779, subject to the conditions recommended by
the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO.
2779.
_
76-299
City Hall, Anaheim, Californi.a .- COUNCI. L lfINUTES - April 27! 1976! 1130
Roll Call Vote!
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Ro:h and Thom
NOES ~ COUNCIL }~MBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL ~MBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-220 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVe. MAPS! TRACT NOS. 9212~ 9213; 9214 AND 9215, REVISION NOS. 1:
(Reclassification No. 75-76-22, Conditional Uge Permit }lo. 1602, Variance No.
2779 and Environmental Impact Report No. 166) Developer, Anaheim Hills, Inc.,
tracts located on the south and west sides of Nohl Ranch Road, easterly of
Anaheim Hills Road; the zoning proposed for these tracts is RS-5000 (SC); the
number of lots proposed is as follows:
Tract No. 9212 - 50 lots.
Tract No. 9213 - 68 lots.
Tract No. 9214 - 46 lots.
Tract No. 9215 - 50 lots.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, the proposed
subdivisions, Tentative .Maps, Tract Nos. 9212, 9213, 9214 and 9215, Revision
Nos. 1, together with their design and improvements, were found to be con-
sistent with the City's General Plan and the City Council approved said
tentative maps, subject to the following conditions, as recommended by the City
Planning Commis sion:
.T. entative Map~ Tract No. 9212; Revision No. 1:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9212 (Revision No. 1)
is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-22 and
Variance No. 2779.
2. That each of the lots in the proposed tract shall be in conformance
with the minimum site requirements of the RS-5000 Zone pertaining to the number
of bedrooms proposed on the sites, and plot plans indicating said conformity
shall be submitted for approval prior to City Council approval of the final
tract map.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
5. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of
the final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and
restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning o~ the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
7. That street'names shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
approval of a final tract map.
8. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
9. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site,
sufficient ~radin$ is require4 to necessitate a gradin§ permit, no work on
§fading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be
borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
76-300
City Hall,L Anaheim, California -. C..OUNCIL MINUTES - A~.ril 27, ..1.976a 1:30 .P..M.
runoff waters originating from higher properties through subject property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement
agreements may be made available to the developers of subject property upon
their request.
10. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originatin8 from this project being carried into the Santa Aha River by storm
water originating from or. flowing through this project.
11. That the alignment and terminal point of storm drains shown on this
tentative tract map mhall not be considered final. Theme drains shall be
subject to precis= design considerations and approval of the City Engineer.
12. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
13. That "L" Street and '~{" Street north and west of the intersection with
"L" Street shall be standard 54-foot wide streets.
14. That all grading shall be in accordance with the requirements of the
City of Anaheim Hillside Grading Ordinance.
15. That the roofs of all structures shall be constructed of non-
combustible material as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
16. That a fire break shall be established around the perimeter of the
tract as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
17. That a parcel map shall be approved and recorded prior to approval of
the final tract map.
Tentative Mapt Tract No. 9213t Revision No. 1:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9213 (P. evision No. 1)
is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-22 and
Variance No. 2779.
2. That each of the lots in the proposed tract shall be in conformance
with the minimum site requirements of the RS-5000 Zone pertaining to the number
of bedrooms proposed on the sites, and plot plans indicating said conformity
shall be submitted for approval prior to City Council approval of the final
tract map.
3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall
shall be constructed on the east and north property lines separating Lot Nos.
16 through 31 and Nohl Ranch Road.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
u t il it ie s.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
6. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of
the final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and
restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
7. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
8. That street names shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
approval of a final tract map.
9. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the buildin8
permit is issued.
10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site,
sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on
grading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site
76-301
City Hall~, Anaheim! California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 27m 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be
borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties through subject property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. §aid drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement
agreements may be made available to the developers of subject property upon
their request.
!1. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into the Santa Aha River by storm
water originatin$ from or flowing through this project.
12. That the alignment and terminal point of storm drains shown on this
tentative tract map shall not be considered final. These drains shall be
subject to precise design considerations and approval of the City Engineer.
13. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
14. That 'E'm Street at the intersection of 'tAm' Street shall be a standard
54-foot wide street.
15. That all grading shall be in accordance with the requirements of the
City of Anaheim Hillside Crading Ordinance.
16. That the roofs of all structures shall be constructed of non-
combustible material as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
17. That a fire break shall be established around the perimeter of the
tract as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
18. That a parcel map shall be approved and recorded prior to approval of
the final tract map.
Tentative Map} Trac.t No. 9214~ Revision No. 1'.
1. THat the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9214 (Revision No. 1)
is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-22 and
Variance No. 2?79.
2. That each of the lots in the proposed tract shall be in conformance
with the minimum site requirements of the RS-5000 Zone pertaining to the number
of bedrooms proposed on the sites, and plot plans indicating said conformity
shall be-submitted for approval prior to City Council approval of the final
tract map.
3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall
shall be constructed on the east property line separating Lot Nos. 33 through
37 and Nohl Ranch Road.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
6. That the.covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Attorneyts Office prior to City Council approval of
the final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and
restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
7. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
8. That street names shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
approval of a final tract map.
9. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
10. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site,
sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on
76-302
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ap=il 27j lq76, 1:3~ P.M.
grading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for o~f-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemation proceedings therefor (the costs o~ which shall be
borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties through subject property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. ~aid drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement
agreements may be made available to the developers of subject property upon
their request.
11. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ama River by storm
water originating from or flowing through this project.
12, That the alignment and terminal point of storm drains shown on this
tentative tract map shall not be considered final. These drains shall be
subject to precise design considerations and approval of the City Engineer.
13. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
14. That all grading shall be done in accordance with the requirements of
the City of Anaheim Hillside Grading Ordinance.
15. That the roofs of all structures shall be constructed of non-
combustible material as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
16. That a fire break shall be established around the perimeter of the
tract as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
17. That a parcel map shall be approved and recorded prior to approval of
the final tract map.
Tentative Map, Tract No. 9215, Revision No. 1:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9215 (Revision No. 1)
is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-22 and
Variance No. 277q.
2. That each of the lots in the proposed tract shall be in conformance
with the minimum site requirements of the RS-5000 Zone pertaining to the number
of bedrooms proposed on the sites, and plot plans indicating said conformity
shall be submitted for approval prior to City Council approval of the final
tract map.
3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall
shall be constructed on the east property line separating Lot No. 1 and Nohl
Ranch Road.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
ut il it les.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of tbs Orange
County Recorder.
6. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of
the final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and
restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
7. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
,q. That street names shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
approval of a final tract map.
9. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to he
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
76-303
City Itall, Anaheim,. Ca~!..f..ornia - couNcIL MI:rO.TES...- A~.rl!' ..2....7, 197_t~,...!:30..P.I!_.
19. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site,
sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on
grading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be
borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties through subject property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement
agreements may be made available to the developers of subject property upon
their request.
11. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ama River by storm
water originating from or flowing through this project.
12. That the alignment and terminal point of storm drains shown on this
tentative tract map shall not be considered final. These drains shall be
subject to precise design considerations and approval of the City Engineer.
13. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
14. That all grading shall be done in accordance with the requirements of
the City of Anaheim Hillside Grading Ordinance.
15. THat the roofs of all structures shall be constructed of non-
combustible material as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
16. That a fire break shall be established around the perimeter of the
tract as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
17. That a parcel map shall be approved and recorded prior to approval of
the final tract map.
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC REARINC - VARIANCE NO. 2788. - Co}~r!~NUAT.!QN...'' On motion by Councilwoman
..... Kaywoo'd, SecOnded by Councilman Seymour, public hearing on the application of
Everett H. and Elms M..Miller to permit an unlawfully established photo-kiosk
located on a service station site on CL zoned property at ~56 South Brookhurst
Street, was continued to the meeting of May 11, 1976, as requested by the
applicant. MOTION CARRIED.
REI!EAKING - VARIA}ICE lie. 2780: Rehearing requested in conjunction with the
application of Paul J. Hubbs, D. Raymond and Ada May !.~o11, to establish a large
equipment rental yard in the ~,~ (SC) Zone at the southwest corner of La Palms
Avenue and Lakeview Avenue, with the following Code waivers, was granted and
public hearing scheduled this date:
a. Minimum landscaped setback.
b. Maximum wall height.
c. Prohibited encroachment of outdoor uses into setback.
d. Required tree screen.
e. Permitted uses.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. PC76-33,
denied Variance No. 2780, which decision was appealed by }ir. Gerard F. Warde,
Oranco Construction, Agent, and the City Council pursuant to their Resolution
No. 76R-121, denied said variance at their meeting of March 16, 1976. Request
for rehearing was granted by the City Council at their meeting of ,March 30,
1976.
Mr. Gerard Warde, 4334 East La Palms Avenue, representing the applicant,
advised that since they were able to negotiate a better price on the additional
property than originally anticipated, they are now able to accept approval
conditioned upon review in five years of those waivers pertaining to the prop-
erty immediately adjacent to Lakeview, which is in escrow currently.
76-304
City Hall, Anaheim,_ California - C.O~CIL. ~II~TES - April 27, 1976
For the benefit of the newly-elected Council Members, Mayor Thom
summarized that at the previous public hearing before the City Council it was
the consensus of opinion that the use with the waivers requested would be
acceptable to the Council with a review of said activity in five years.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either in
favor or in opposition to Variance No. 2780; there being no response, he
declared the hearing closed.
ENVIRONI'~NTAL IMPACT .REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLAP~TIOM.. EubJect project was
granted negative declara~ion status from the requirement to prepare an environ-
mental impact report at the Council meeting of March 1~, 1976, as recommended
By the City Planning Commission and this action was reaffirmed on motion by
Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-221: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-221 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2780, subject to the following
Interdepartmental Committee recommendations, with review in five years, and
further subject to the stipulation contained in the applicant's letter dated
March 23, 1976:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street
along La Palma and Lakeview Avenues for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along La
Palma and Lakeview Avenues including preparation of improvement plans and
installation of all improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street
grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be
complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer and that
street lighting facilities along La Palma and Lakeview Avenues shall be
installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance
with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the Director of
Public Utilities and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City
of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the
above mentioned requirements.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public 1,7orks.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay appropriate drainage
assessment fees to the City of Anaheim as determined by the City Engineer prior
to approval of a grading plan.
8. That this variance is granted subject to completion of annexation of
subject property to the City of Anaheim.
9. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of
Rec2assification No. 70-71-47.
10. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file %rlth the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
},~os. 1, ~, and 3.
11. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 8, and q, above mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this
resolution, or prior to the tim~ that the building permit ~s issue~, or within
a period of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further
time as the Planning Commission and/or City Council may grant.
12. That Condition Nos. 3, 5, 6, and 10, above mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TItE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRAY,TING VARIANCE NO.
2780.
Roll Call Vote:
II
City N~ll!l, ..Ana!~eim.! Cali.f..ornia - .COUN.CIL ..MINUTES -..April...27, 1976, 1.:3.0 P_.M.
AYES: COUNCIL D~E~BERS: !laywood, Seymour, gott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COLPNCIL ~E~ER.S: ~one
ABSE',:T: COUNCIL ~EMBERS: ~one
The ~ayor declared ~solution No. 76R-221 duly passed and adopted.
general consent the Council recessed for ten minu~es, (3:15 P.~.)
AFTER RECESS; Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all ~embers of the City
Council ~eing present. (3:P_5 P.~..)
PUELIC FIP. E~.OOI:E DISPLAY PEP?IT - DIg?.:E%~;CID: Application of R. Souza, General
Manager, California Fireworks Display Company, for permit to stage nightly
fireworks displays at Disneyland beginning June 1n through September
an~ at midnight New Year's Eve, Decem]~er 31, ln76, wns approved as recommended
by the Anaheim Fire ,~'~arshal, on motion by Councilman ~eym.~our, seconded by
Councilman Roth. }~OTION CARRIED.
SOLICITATIOi~ P.E?~.'[IT - EDUCATIO~_IAL ACIIIEVEi~E:.~T FOLP.~DATION: Application submitted
by Art!mr E. Ftndley, Educational Achievement Foundation, 1.~778 l~Teaver, South
E1 ~'!onte, California, for permission to conduct door-to-door solicitation
within the City of Anaheim from April 15 through May 15, 1076, together with
report and recommendation by the City Attorney's Office and License Division,
was denied, on motion by Councilman Roth, seconded hy Councilman gott, on the
basis of written and verbal evidence presented. MOTION CARRIED.
OVE~I~{T PARIII~.IG OF CAMPERS - ~{AHEIM PLAZA: Request of Chris W. Roscoe,
General Manager, Anaheim Plaza, 500 l~orth Euclid Street, for permission to
allow visiting artists to park campers overnight during exhibitions of their
work at Anaheim Plaza during the periods of April 2~ to May 2, 1~76,
September 17 to 20, lq76 and February 24 through 28, 1Q77, was submitted
together with recommendation from the Planning Department.
Following brief discussion between Council Members and Mr. Roscoe during
which it was pointed out that business licenses would be necessary only if the
works of art were to be sold, as opposed to exhibition only, on motion by
Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilnu~n ~eymour, the City Council approved the
overnight parking of campers at the Anaheim Plaza during ~he periods requested,
subject to the obtainment by the Anaheim Plaza management of a Special Events
Permit from the Planning Department prior to any occupancy with approvals from
the Anaheim Fire Chief, Police Chief, Director of Public Works and the City
Attorney. MOTION CARRIED.
CO~!DITIO~]AL USE PE~IT IIO. 1587: Request of Lloyd McDonald to address the
Council relative to the ML zoned property located southwesterly of the inter-
section of Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, (Pacific l~orld) on which
Conditional Use Permit No. 1587 has been approved, was continued to the meeting
of May 4, le76, at his request, on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by
Councilman Seymour. MOTIOM CARRIED.
E~I~E~T DO}WkIN PROCEEDINGS - FAIrmONT BOULEVARD; 7~'~r, ~*a~ts reported on the
resolution prepared for Council adoption declaring the public need and neces-
sity ~o initiate eminent domain proceedings against several separate parcels of
property under three.different ownerships in connection with right-of-way for
Fairmont Boulevard between Santa Ama Canyon Road to Canyon Rim ~oad (Reynolds,
Nicolas and I{urata). He reported that these property owners were made aware
that this action would be reco.~nended to Council this date.
Councilman Seymour reviewed for the benefit of the newly-elected Council
Members the efforts which the City Council and City staff have conducted over
the past two years in connection with this right-of-way, including three to
four public hearings, four general informational r~eetings and many meetings of
the Canyon General Planning Tasl~ Force. lie referred to the rip. hr-of-way plan
posted in the Council CharYer and advised that altkough it may not appear to be
an equitable arrangement for certain of the property owners, thi,~ plan does
represent the best efforts of all those involved over the past two years. He
advised that delay of this particular road alignment would preclude any further
development in the area and would leave certain properties landlocked.
76-306
_City ii~llI Anaheimj Callfomia ~,,- COUNCIL HII~,.TES -Apri! 27~ .1976,
,RESOLUTION NO. 76R-222: Councilman ge~nour offered Resolution No. 76R-222 fear
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINrNC ~ NECES-
SITY FOR AND DIRECTING TIlE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN OF REAL PROPERTY FOR
ROAD~ PUBLIC UTILITY AND SLOPE PURPOSES FOR FAIRMONT BOULEVARD. (Reynolds,
Mutate and Nicolas)
Roll Call Vote:
·
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kerr, Roth 'and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENTs COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-222 duly passed, and adopCedo
Mr. Watts reported for Council information only, that because there.is
some urgency to settling this ~tter, the roadway being an AHFP proJect,"he
would shortly report to Council with a rec~endation for retention of.outside
Counsel Co represent the City in this case.
PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT - VIETNAMESE AMERICAN MUTUAL ASSOCIATION: On motion by
Councilman Thom, Seconded by Councilman S~ysmur', publ'~c dance permit requested
by Bien QuA Le on behalf of the Vietnamese American Mutual Associa~ion for~
dance to be held April 30, 1976, at the Anaheim High School Auditorium (Cook
Auditorium) from 11:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., was approved, subject to provisions
of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as reconnnended by the Chief of
Police. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT - CINCO DE MAYO FIESTA~ On motion by Councilman Seymour,
seConde~ by councilman ~hom, pUblic dance permit for a dance to be held in
Martin Recreation Hall by the Fremont Junior ltigh School Parent Advisory
Committee in conjunction with the CAnto De Mayo Fiesta at La Palina Park, May 1,
1976, from 8:00 p.m. to midnight was approved, subject to the provisions of
Chapter ~.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as recowanended by the Chief of
Police. MOTION CARRIED.
DEFERME. N~. OF DRAINAGE FEESs PARCEL ~AP NO, ~17~ The City Engineer presented
request of ~r. Robert Wises, 7536 Vista Del Sol, Anaheim, that he be. permitted
to pay drainage fees in connection with Parcel Map No. 517 (amounting to a
total of $16,392.60) on the basis of the parcel affected by the building permit
which he wishes to take out rather than on all undeveloped land in the parcel
map.
Mr. Maddox reported that he has received other similar requests but is
holding up letters pending direction from the Council on this particula~ case.
During Council discussion, Councilman Seymour stated that he sees no logic
in collection of these fees at the ~ime of filing of a parcel map, if the
rationale of doing it at that point is Just to collect the money sooner and he
would support a change in this policy if this be the case. However if there
are valid reasons for proceeding with collection of drainage fees on filing of
parcel maps he would like to be notified of these as they vould assist in
determining whether ~he curren~ policy is equitable.
At the conclusion of discussion, on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded
by Councilman Eott, the City Council approved the collection of drainage fees
for only the property affected by the building permit application in Parcel Nap
No. 517, and further directed that staff review the policy on collection of
drainage fees with report to Council on the ramifications, if any, of
permitting these fees to be paid on parcels individually at the ~ime of
building permit application. MOTION CARRIED.
NATIONAL FLOOD. INSURANCE - HA~__AU!~_ MAPS: Mr. Thompson presented a brief status
report on the flood maps indicating that they have been in contact with both
the Federal and local office of HUD and these agencies still have not received
their copies of Anaheim's Revised Flood Plan Hazard Maps. The Firenen's Fund
has indicated that their copies are an route. The Federal office has assured
76-307
City Ha!l, A~ah~,im, Cali£ornia, ~,,C0,,UN, CIL ,MINU~E$- April 27! 1976m l~30 P.M.
the Planning Department that every step is beinS taken to mail these copies out
so that the citizens who had to purchase the insurance can obtain refunds.
Councilman Seymour voiced the opinion that this is an extremely important
matter in which he refuses to become disinterested because of the bureaucratic
problems. He suggested, if the other members of the Council were not desirous
of hearinS weekly reports at Council meetings, that the Flanning Director be
directed to report to him pereonelly on the proBress of requirements Being met
so ~ha~ the refunds can be distributed,
Council Members felt that weekly progess reports should be made at Council
meetings, under the "Unfinished Business" section of the A§enda.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: O~ motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by
Councilman Thom, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the
reports and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the
Consent Calendar Agenda:
1. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to
the insurance carrier:
a. Claim submitted by Auto Club of Southern California on behalf of
Michael P. Murphy for damages purportedly sustained as a result of condition in
street at Tustin Avenue, between La Palma and Orangethorpe Avenues, on or about
March 13, 1976.
B. Claim submitted by Robert Wiens for damage sustained tovehicle
purported as a result of being struck By City of Anaheim truck, on or about
December 15, 1975.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed:
a. City of Seal Beach - Resolution No. 2541 - Opposing any plan to remove
the Navy from administration of the Los Alamitos Naval Air Station and
supporting the current level of operations at LANAS as the maximum, compatible,
safe use of Los Alamitos Air Station.
b. 'City of Garden Grove - Resolution No. 4995-76 - Supporting the
maintenance of operations control o£ the Naval Air Station at Los Alamitos by
the Department of the Navy.
c. City of Garden Grove - Resolution No. 4998-76 - Supporting the
development of nuclear energy in California.
d. City of Irvine - Resolution No. 540 - Supporting the position of the
City of Yorba Linde in its opposition to the development of an airport in the
Chino Hills area.
e. LAFCO - Minutes - March 24, 1976.
f. Parks and Recreation Commission - Minutes - March 18, 1976.
g. Anaheim Sports Council Executive Board -Minutes -March 3, 1976.
h. Anaheim Intermode System Committee - Minutes - March I0, 1976.
i. Financial and operating reports for the month of March 1976 for the
?olice Department and the City Treasurer.
MOTION CAI{PIED.
F. gSOLUTION Nos, 76R-223 THROUGH 76R-226: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution
Nos. 76R-223 through-76R-226, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with
the reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member
and as listed on the Consent Calendar A~enda.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-223 - FINAL ACCEPTANCE! WORK ORDER NO. 731-A~ A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY c'o~NC'iL' OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND
THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFOR-
MANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE MODIFICATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING
AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 731-A. (Steiny and
Company, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-2.21..- WORK ORDER NO. 1613: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND
76-308
City ,HallI Anaheim! California - ,COUNCIL MINUTES - ,April ,,27! 1976! ,1 ~30 P.~,,~
NECESSITY RE~JIRE T~E CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TO
WIT: 1975-76 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM - ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS, IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1613~ APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES,
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF I AUTHORIZING THE CON-
STRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMF-NT IN ACCOBDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICA-
TIONS, ETC. I AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE
INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids =o be Opened -
May 27, 1976, 2:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-225 - WORK ORDER NO. 776-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
TO WIT: SYCAMORE STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, W/O STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, IN
T~E CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 776-B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PRO-
FILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF~ AUTHORIZING
THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A
NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be
Opened - May 27, 1976, 2:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-226 - WORK ORDER NO. 1263: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEME}~ TO
WIT: COUNTRY HILL ROAD SEWER IMPROVEMENT, S/O MOHLER DRIVE, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1263~ APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF~ AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION
OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC. I
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING
SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - .May 27,
1976, 2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Selmour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-223 throulh 76R-226, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-227 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 775-A: Councilman Roth offered
Resolution No. 76R-227 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PRO-
POSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOW~ST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISH-
ING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES
AND TKANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WI)ILK
NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT'.
BROADWAY-MANCHESTER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, NORTHWEST CORNER, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 775-A. (Venture Contracting - 92,370.50)
Roll Call Vote=.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Rott, Roth and Thom
NOES ~ COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-227 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NOS. 3526 AND 3527: Councilwoman Radwood offered Ordinance Nos. 3526
and 3527 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3526: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SUSPENDING TIlE POWERS
OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND REPEALING CHAPTER 1.24 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE.
76-309
City Hall~ Anaheim;California - CO,.UNCIL MINUTES.- .April 27, .!976, 1.:~.0 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 3527: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SECTIONS
1.04.600, 1.04.610, 1.04.620, 1.04.630 ~ND 1.04.640 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 1.04.600, 1.04.610, 1.04.620, 1.04.630 AND 1.04.640
THE AN~IEIMMUNICIPAL CODE. (Itousing Commission)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES; COUNCIL MEMBERS; Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT; COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nog. 3526 and 3527 duly passed
and adopted.
0RD. INANCE NO. 3528: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3528 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ~NAItEIMAMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (75-76-10, RS-7200)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNC IL MEMBERS; None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3528 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE }lOS. 3529 TI~OUGIt 3531: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance Nos. 3529
through 3531 for first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 3529: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AN~IEIM
AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND TI~ BOARD
OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREI~NT SYSTEM. (One
year final compensation)
ORDINANCE NO. 3530: AN ORDINANCE OF T}~ CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (75-76-18, RM-1200)
ORDINA~NCE NO. 3531: ~=N ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAitEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (74-75-9, RM-4000)
APPOINTMENT - CANYON GENERAL PLANNING TASK FORCE: On motion by Councilman
Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Phillip Bettencourt of Anaheim
Hills, Inc., was appointed to the Canyon General Planning Task Force to replace
Mr. John Millick. MOTION CARRIED.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL - LAKEVIEW AND RIVERDALE: Councilman Seymour noted that he has
received a memor~'dum from the City Engineer's Office in reply to the traffic
situation at the intersection of Lakeview and Riverdale which prompted a
petition containing over 300 signatures urging early installation of a signal.
He questioned whether there is any way this signal might be installed in less
than the 150 days as'reported and suggested that funds which were allocated in
the current budget year for one-half the cost of a traffic signal, but not
used, be reallocated to assist in providing a signal at this particular inter-
sect ion.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaln~ood, the
City Council authorized a transfer of $21,000 in undesignated traffic signal
funds to be reallocated toward the cost of installation of a traffic signal at
the intersection of Lakeview and Riverdale Avenues. MOTION CARRIED.
FLOOD MAPS: At the request of Councilwoman Kaywood, the following portion of the
meeting has been transcribed verbatim from the tape recording:
"ROTH; I have one thing I would like to say, I would like to comm~nd the
previous Council for obtaining the Revised Flood Hazard Maps. I think it is
really a fantastic thing that this body felt and willed enough to do something
about it. Evidently it will mean lower costs for home buyers in Anaheim, lover
76-310
City Hall~ Anaheim! California
monthly payments, and it is a step in the right direction. I think this
Council should be commended for sticking w/th it and going co %)ashingCon co do
something about it.
THOM: Particularly John Seymour.
SEYMOUR: Don, I Just hope in 78, when maybe there are some new Councilmen
sitting up here they are not say~ng the same th/.ng about the old Councilmen in
the same status.
ROTH; I think it is a fantastic ]ob, Just great."
GHARTERKEVIEW COMMITTEE ORGANIZATION: Brief discussion was held regarding the
size and format of the Char:er Review Committee to be established and it was
suggested that each Council Member appoint 3 voting members and 3 alternates for
a work number of 15 on the ¢omnittee.
Councilman Roth advised that this system worked quite well in 1963 and
1964 and provided sufficient back up and continuity, should voting members not
be present. The alternates would be encouraged to attend all meetings. The
remainder of the Council were agreeable to this proposal.
Councilman Seymour stressed that he would very much like to see the
efforts of the Charter Review Committee culminate in a ballot proposal in time
for the November 1976 election, at which there is anticipated a much greater
voter turnout than usual. He stressed that if the Committee recommends any
Charter amendments, he would very much like these to be voted on by a larger
percentage of the Anaheim citizenry than is generally experienced in a
municipal or other general election. Therefore, the November Presidential
ballot presents an excellent opportunity to place such amendments before the
public for their decision. Councilman Seymour stressed that he felt it is
critical these proposed amendments be prepared in time for that election as the
next such opportunity will not be for another four years.
Since the placement on the November ballot would require that the Charter
Review Committee be completed with their work by approximately the end of July,
in order to allow sufficient time for wording to be drawn up for placement on
the ballot and to submit same to the County of Orange, the Council determined
that they would advise potential Committee appointees that they would be
meeting weekly at least and perhaps twice a week for a period of two months.
Council Members further determined that prospective Committee Members should be
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
Further discussion was directed to the charge to be given to the Committee
Members, and Council determined they would initially present the items included
by Councilman Kott in his ori~inal motion for their consideration.
At the conclusion of discussion, Council Members agreed to present the
names of appointees at the Council meeting of May 4, 1976.
Councilwoman 'KaF~ood commented on communication received from the Anaheim
Chamber of Commerce 'offering to participate and to submit names from the
business community for possible inclusion on the Committee.
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Seymour moved to recess to Executive
Session. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:30
P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Members of the City
Council being present. (6:00 P.M.)
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Seymour moved to adjourn. Councilman Thom seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 6:00 P.M.
ALONA. M. HOUCARD, CITY CLERK
Deputy