1976/05/11
76-329
City Hall, Anaheim,. Ca¿).fornL~ - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council
f the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom.
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY :1ANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch
ASSISTANT C[TY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY CLERK: Alana M. Hougard
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry O. McRae
UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon W. Hoyt
FIRE CHIEF: James Riley
MANPOWER COORDINATOR: William Hepburn
DATA PROCESSING MANAGER: Keith Parkyn
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti
Mayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance
to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION:
Invocation.
Reverend Gordon Sloan of the Melodyland Hotline Center gave the
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Don R. Roth led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Thom and
unanimously approved by the City Council:
"Anaheim Senior Citizens Day" - May 22, 1976 - accepted by
Fred Fleishour, President of the Anaheim Senior Citizen's Club.
"National Public Works Week" - May 23 through 29, 1976, accepted
by James Maddox, City Engineer.
"Girls" Club Week - 1976" - May 9 through 15, 1976.
"National Transportation Week" - Week of May 16, 1976, accepted with
appropriatè remarks by Supervisor Ralph Clark.
"Municipal Clerk's Week" - Hay 10 through 14, 1976, accepted by
Alana M. Hnugard, City Clerk.
YOUTH IN GOVERNMENT - PROCLAMATION: Noting that Miss Suzanne Delesk, the
Honorary Mayor of the City of Anaheim for Youth in Government Day 1976,
was present in the audience, Mayor Thorn offered the thanks of the Council
for the Youth Proclamation and noted that the City Council had attempted
last year to establish the Youth Council which they advocated without much
success because the student participating in Youth in Government Day were
Seniors. It was suggested that the participants next year be in their
Junior year.
Councilwoman Kaywood suggested that students be invited to participate
on the Citizen's Capital Improvement Committee,and it was determined that
letters of invitation would be mailed to each of the students who participated
in Youth in Government Day, if residents of the City, and to each high school
campus, requesting two nominees to be invited to attend as well.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meeting held April 6,1976
were approved on motIon by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom.
Council Members Kott and Roth abstained. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent
to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after
reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the
reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Seymour seconded the
motion. MOTION UNANINOlJSLY CARRIED.
REPORT - FINANCIAL DID1ANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the
amount of $4,2h3,340.50, in accordance with the 1975-76 Budget, were approved.
11
~----- -...~'~~~~~_.. "o,,~--
76-330
ficy Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
EXTENSION OF TIME - MULTIMODAL GROUP, INC: Mr. Murdoch reviewed the condition
precedent to execution of the Multimodal Lease Agreement and advised that this
firm has requested an extention of time in which to comply with the condition
which requires a $300,000 obligation on their part in a form acceptable to
the City. The original resolution set a time period of 45 days in which to
comply and they are now requesting an extension to July 15, 1976, a period of
60 days,in which to complete financial arrangements.
In reply to Councilman Roth, Mr. Murdoch explained the contingencies for
additional parking built into the lease agreement, and noted that the Angels'
parking rights would be protected.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-239: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 76R-239 for
adoption, extending the period of time to comply with the condition precedent
from May l5 to July 15, 1976.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MULTIMODAL GROUP, INC., TO COMPLY WITH THE CONDITION
PRECEDENT IN RESOLUTION NO. 76R-159.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-239 duly passed and adopted.
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO RETIRE - CITY MANAGER: Mr. Keith A. Murdoch read a letter
to the City Council indicating his intent to retir~ effective July 9. 1976. He
expressed gratitude for the more than 25 years he has spent as the City Manager
and reviewed some of the many accomplishments during those years.
Councilman Seymour voiced the Council's appreciation for the strength
dnd leadership offered the City by Mr. Murdoch during the past 25 years.
Councilwoman Kaywood added that he has also proven to be a marvelous public
relations man,as well as a fine leader, in every professional sense of the word.
On motion by Councilman Thorn, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City
Council accepted, with regret, the letter of intention to retire effective
July 9,1976, submitted by Keith A. Murdoch, City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-240 and 76R-24l - NEW JOB CLASSIFICATIONS: On report and
recommendation of the Personnel Director to create the classification of
Employee Benefits Representative, Golf Course Ranger, and Geo-Coding Project
Coordinator, Councilman Roth offered Resolution Nos. 76R-240 and 76R-241 for
adop tí on.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-240: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 74R-520 AND ESTABLISHING NEW CLASSIFICATIONS
AND RATES OF PAY. (Employee Benefits Representative and Golf Course Ranger)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-241: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
fu~AHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 74R-521 AND ESTABLISHING A NEW CLASSIFICATION
AND RATE OF PAY. (Geo-Coding Proj ec t Coordinator, Effective 4-30-76)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-240 and 76R-241 duly passed and
adopted.
AGREEMENT - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL/NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH CORPS: (1976 Summer
Youth Program) Mr. William Hepburn presented the proposed agreement with the
Orange County Community Development Council to establish the 1976 Summer Youth
1T
, ,
. .C~,T .",. "..,.~..=~~., ~
,~,- ".'-"-
76-331
~~iLHall, An;]heL~Ç?lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Program which will provide US jobs for disadvantaged Anaheim youths aged
14 to 21 in a combination work experience and counseling program. Total
funding for this program lS $270.620.00 which will be forwarded by the Orange
County Manpower Commission.
Councilman Seymour inquired what becomes of the staff of 7 people re-
quired to administer the program once it is terminated, and Mr. Hepburn replied
that these are permanent staff members of the Community Development Council
organization wþo have contracts to operate the In-School Program which ends
when the Summer Youth Program begins.
In response to Councilman Kott, Mr. Hepburn described some of the job
programs and how eligibility for same is determined.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-242:
for adoption.
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-242
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COlillCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
&~D THE ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, INC., RELATING TO
A SUMMER YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-242 duly passed and adopted.
ADDITIONAL ELECTRONIC COMPUTER MEMORY - CAMBRIDGE MEMORIES, INC: Mr. Keith Parkyn
reported that the Data Processing Division has attempted to defer purchase of
this additional memory to the next fiscal year with technical postponement
methods, but are unable to do so any longer as it would impede development of
the system which would cost the City approximately $7,000 per week. It is,
therefore, requested that the additional memory positions be added by modifica-
tion of the lease agreement with Cambridge Memories, Inc., and the agreement
be extended to June 30, 1977. The additional cost during the current fiscal
year which would result from the modification of the agreement is $1,800.00.
In response to Councilman Seymour, Mr. Parkyn advised that either way
the City decides to go with MDS, this additional equipment is necessary.
RESOLùIION NO. 76R-243:
for adoption.
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-243
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE
EXTENSION OF AN EQUIPI>1ENT LEASE AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM THERETO, AND &~
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH CAMBRIDGE MEMORIES, INC. FOR A COMPUTER
ELECTRONIC MEMORY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS.
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-243 duly passed and adopted.
REPORT - FIRE ACCESS TO WILSHIRE-WESTMONT CONDOMINIUM: Chief Riley submitted
his report dated May 7, 1976 prepared in response to Council's request at
their meeting of May 4, 1976. The Fire Chief concluded that in and of itself
neither the basic design of the apartment structure adjacent to the Wilshire-
Westmont Condominiu~nor its location on the Wilshire/Pearl land parcel,
caused abnormal effect upon the Fire Department's ability to attack the blaze.
Further, assuming complete construction of these units in accordance with the
existing plans and City Codes, no unreasonable fire danger would exist.
11
~---..'-"=.~' .
--,-
76-332
.~g.LlIall, Anaheim, C:aliJornia- COUNCIL MINUTES - M~ll, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
,"'Ir. Don Carmody, 278 Wilshire, Anaheim, representing Mrs. Jean Moreau
and the property owners 0 f the Wilshire-Westmont Condorliniums, stated that the
Fire Chief's report has answered their concerns and commented that in their
estimation both Police and Fire Departments did an excellent job on April 27
3t the fire in the adjacent apartment building. A copy of the Fire Chief's
report was supplied to Mr. Carmody.
PROPOSED AGREE~1ENT - NEVADA POWER COMPANY: Hr. Hoyt reported that negotiations
have been completed with the Nevada Power Company for the purchase and sale of
economy energy to the City of Anaheim which it is anticipated will result in
puchased power savings for Anaheim of $1,000,000 per year over the next four
years. The agreement is contemplated to be four and one-half years long and
involves a prepayment of $12,500,000 for which the City of Anaheim will issue
electric revenue bonds and amortize them over the period of the contract.
The savings which are expected include amortization costs. He outlined
that the Nevada Power Agreement would be brought to Council for approval on
Nay 18, 1976; on May 25, 1976 the Bond Resolution, Official Statement and
Notice of Sale for the $12,500,000 Bond Issue would be presented for Council
approval, in the hope that award of bonds might occur on June 8 and closing
with exchange of money and bonds would occur June 24 or June 29,1976 at the
latest.
Mr. Hoyt explained that these bonds would be second-lien bonds rather
than parity bonds because of the short term and expected to amortize in
a four and one-half year period. They would be payable out of surplus revenues
and the financial consultant advises the City should receive a triple A rating
with under 5% interest. He referred to the table presented together with the
copy of the final draft agreement which is intended to show the origin of the
savings.
Mr. Watts explained that the cumulative savings mentioned under Item A
which total $5,500,000 by the period ending June 30, 1980 should be vi~wed in
the light that this includes all costs except the cost of money, and in order
to reach the $3.8 million dollars,it is necessary to subtract from that the
City's cost of money.
In response to Councilman Kott, Mr. Hoyt explained that the $12,500,000
would come from a second issue of the $150,000,000 bonds authorized by the
Anaheim electorate in 1975. He commented that by 1980 the City will have
used up some of the bonding capacity on this transaction and will probably go
back to the electorate for more money to finance involvement in generation and
transmission projects as they appear. He further explained that this proposed
bond issue will be a second-lien bond inasmuch as should Proposition 15, the
nuclear initiative on the June 8 ballot, fail, he would expect to come back to
the Council with a recommendation late this year to participate in San Onofre
Generating Station Units 2 and 3, which would require $35,000,000. If this
current proposed issue were parity bonds and were still outstanding at that
time, the City could exceed its bonding capacity.
I.n reply
not aware of
placed on the
bond funds in
to Councilman Kott, Mr. Watts explained that while the City was
any forthcoming transactions of this nature, the bond issue
ballot was specifically worded to include the ability to use the
this manner.
In response to Councilman Seymour, Mr. Hoyt reiterated that the bonds would
be amortized in a four and one-half period; that the agreement calls for the
City to pay $12,500,000 in return for which Nevada Power Company agrees to sell
surplus energy. For the first year of the agreement, the City will pay cash for
the energy, there will be no credit against the $12,500,000. In the second,
third and fourth year, the Nevada Power Company will continue to sell energy
to the City of Anaheim and this cost will be debited from the $12,500,000.
In response to the concern raised by Councilman Kott as to whether or not
these savings will be passed on to the consumers, Councilman Seymour stated that
it is his ambition that the people decide this issue by means of a charter
amendment. He further inquired as to what the status is of the recommendation
on a Utilities Commission.
Mr. Hoyt replied that the Chamber Task Force is still active in this re-
gardand had requested the City Attorney and himself to prepare some materials
which would outline the duties and powers of such a Commission. These have
been drawn up and sent to that Task Force just last week.
1r
"."--C_~'.~""~""-'~"--~-"-~ ..,--
76-333
_Cilÿ Hall, AnaheimL_ÇaljfoI.1:!.ia -.:=- cml...Nq_L...:!v!IN_UTES - H~_11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Hoyt advised that hI" was not seeking any action from the Council
today, but 'Nished to present this information and advise the Council Members
he will be avai~able to ans~'r any que~tions Council may have during the week.
(Submitted to the Council was a copy èJf the final draft of the Nevada Power
:~ompany Agreement and schedu entitL_'d "Example of Transaction for 250,000,000
KWH per Year as Minimum Annual Energy Purchase Per Agreement")
CounciJman Seymo\¡r slatted that he did not believe a Charter Amendment
to insure that the Anaheim electrical consumers receive a percentage of
savings through generation is that complicated a matter. He thereupon moved
that a letter be forwarded to the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce requesting that
the Task Force charged with the responsibility of recommending a Charter
Amendment forward their report and recommendation to the City Council within
two weeks from today's date, or the City Council feels it must act independently
in this matter. Councilman Thorn seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS:
By general consent the Council recessed for five minutes. (2:55 p.m.)
--
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thorn called the meeting to order,
present. (3:00 p.m.)
all Council Members being
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING -- VARIANCE NO.2 788: Application of Everett H. and
Alma M. Miller for the following Code waiver to permit an unlawfully established
Photo-Kiosk on a service station site located on CL zoned property at 956 South
Brookhurst Street, was submitted together with application for exemption status
from the requirements to prepare an E.I.R.
a.
permitted uses.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-49, reported
that the Planning Director has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, the City of Anaheim Guidelines
to the requirements fDr an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt, and further denied Variance No. 2788.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by
,j. B. Holland, Terri tory Hanager, Shell Oi 1 Company, Agent for the Applicant,
and public hearing scheduled April 27, 1976. Said public hearing was continued
to this date at the request of the appellant.
Miss Santalahti described the location and s11rrounding land uses and
r-eviewed the staff report which was submitted to and considered by the Planning
Commission. She commented that subject Variance application was initiated
pursuant to actions taken by the Zoning Enforcement Officer.
The Mayor asked .L
'Jddress the Council.
the Applicant or his Agent was
present and wished to
Mr. John Holland, Territory Manager, Shell Oil Company, acting as an agent
lor the property owners described that the subject service station was rebuilt
in 1973 and converted from a 20-vear old unit to the self-service concept. He
stressed the differen,'es between the self-service style station versus the
traditional type which deals in automobile repair, service and accessories
and advised that the oil business and its marketing techniques are changing.
He disagreed with the City Planning Commission's opinion that the sale of film
ancí film processing service creates a second primary use. Rather, he contended
t hat the sale and processing does ful fill. a motorist's need and that this is
evidenced by the overall acceptance and use of this service in conjunction with
gasoline sales. In conclusion, Mr. Holland stated that his firm believes the
film processing and sale of film should be considered one of the allowable
and/or acceptable accessory uses for service stations.
Mr. Walter Degenfelter, identified himself as being a resident of the
condominium adjacent to the subject service station and questioned what
provisions for traffic control had been made in view of the film sales.
Mr. Holland responded that there are signs indicating exit only on both
sides of the exit drive which is a single drive and would not accommodate both
in and out traffic.
Tr
.. --~""'-'-"'"-'-~=<u.
-,,_.
76- 334
CitLHall, Anaheim, CaLifo~!:lLa__~C([~NCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor asked If anvone else wished to address the Council.
being no response, he declared the hearing closed.
there
Councilman Roth stated his observation of this particular station is
that it is particularly clean and attractive and is, therefore, deserving
of some consideration. In addition he noted that a service station located
only one-half mile away from this particular intersection is enjoying this
right because they instituted it prior to the City's adoption of the service
station ordinance.
In response to Councilman Kott, Mr. Watts stated that his opinion as to
the definition of an accessory would be contrary to that stated by Mr. Holland,
i.e., that the general rule of interpretation is that accessories are con-
sidered to be things that are associated with or are similar in use and it
would be difficult to construe films and film processing as an automotive
accessory.
Councilwoman Kaywood voiced her concern that by permitting the sale and
processing of film as an accessory use, it would create a precedent for
requests to sell all kinds of other unrelated items in conjunction with
gasoline at service stations.
Mayor Thorn stated that he felt the Council should
ordinance to provide for sale of a certain category of
stations without need for variance procedure or uphold
He stated that he saw no hardship in this situation to
approving of a variance.
either amend the
items in all service
the existing ordinance.
serve as rationale for
Councilman Roth indicated that he based his thinking on the changing
times and marketing techniques and therefore where an adjunct use would
support the desirability of the facility, then some latitude should be
given.
Councilman Seymour stated that he found this particular service station
to be a more desirable alteroative than some in the City and did not want to
deprive the operator of a source of revenue which may, in tur~ lead to some of
the less attractive conditions seen in other such facilities. On the other
hand, he indicated that he was not willing to set the ordinance aside.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thorn, the City Council ratified the determination
of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within the definition
of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements
for an environmental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to file an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION: Councilwoman Kaywood offered a resolution upholding the action
taken by the City Planning Commission to deny Variance No. 2788. Said
resolution failed to carry by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL
COUNCIL
COUNCIL
COUNCIL
MEMBERS:
MEMBERS:
MEMBERS:
MEMBERS:
Kaywood
Seymour
Kott
None
and Thom
and Roth
_RESOLUTION NO. 76R-244: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-244
granting Variance No. 2788 subject to the following condition recommended by
the Interdepartmental Committee:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
No.1.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
~O. 2788
11
0.... ... ..- ...... -~"'.'-'- -....
"-
76-335
Ci_!::"y- Hajl, Anaheim, Cali,-f~:.!:E!.:!c..?__~COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Seymour, Kott and Roth.
Kaywood and Thorn
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-244 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-19 & VARIANCE NO. 2793; Application
initiated by the Anaheim City Planning Commission for a change in zone from
CL to RM-1200 (Portions A and B) and the following Code waiver for property
located at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Empire Street was submitted
together with application for exemption status from the requirement to prepare
an E. I. R. :
a.
permitted uses (Porti.on A only)
The City Planning Coll@ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-62 re-
ported that the Planning Director has determined that the proposed activity
falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim
Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an E.I.R. and,
further, recommends that Reclassification No. 75-76-19 as readvertised, be
unconditionally approved.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-63, granted
Variance No. 2793 subject to the following condition:
1. That this variance is granted to permit the existing commercial
office uses ("information Research" at 2119 West Ball Road, "Robert W. Hardin"
at 2127 West Ball Road, and "Cotter Institute of Hypnosis" at 2l3l-A west
Ball Road) to continue on the subject property; provided, however, that when
the present office use of the property ceases, the applicable units shall
revert to residential usage and this variance shall then become null and
void on the affected portion of the property, unless otherwise approved by
the Planning Commission or City Council.
Miss Santalahti described the location and surrounding land uses. She
outlined the findings given in the staff report which was submitted to and
considered by the City Planning Commission.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Don Pauna, owner of two buildings on subject property, addressed the
Council. Although he initially stated he had no objection to the proposed
rezoning, it was determined following Council conversation with Mr. Pauna that
he wished to retain the ability to rent the apartment unit for either residen-
tial or commercial uses. Mr. Pauna contended that the parking, traffic and
noise situation on Ball Road make the units difficult to rent for residential
purposes.
There being no further persons who wished to address the Council, the
~1avor closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council ratified the determina-
tion of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within the defini-
tion of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements
for an environmental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to file an E.I.R. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-245: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 76R-245
for adoption authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing
the zone to RM-1200 as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-19,
RM-1200)
11
'~C~~~>..~L"
--
76-336
.C_~-~.Y_J:!~Ll, Anaheim, Califorr~_~él- - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUN CIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-245 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-246: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 76R-246
for adoption granting Variance No. 2793 as recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 2793.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-246 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-27: (Tentative Tract No. 9287,
Rev. No. l) Application of Cruz Vargas for a change of zone from RS-A-43,000
to RS-SOOO on property located on both sides of Waverly Drive, south of
Wakefield Avenue, was submitted together with application for exemption
status from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-6l,
recommended that subject project be declared exempt from the requirement
to prepare an environmental impact report and further recommended that
Reclassification No. 75-76-27 be approved for RS-7200 zoning, subject to
the following conditions.
1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 30 feet in width along each side of the projected centerline
of Waverly Drive, for a total width of 60 feet, for street construction
purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along
Waverly Drive, including preparation of improvement plans and installation
of all improvements such as curbs and gutters. sidewalks, street grading
and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work, shall be complied
with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans
and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; that street
lighting facilities along Waverly Drive shall be installed as required by
the Director of Public Utilities. and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the Office of the Director of Public Utilities; or
that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall
be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned
requirements.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framing.
4. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
5. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council. said fees to be paid at the time the
building permit is issued.
6. That a final tract map of subject property. indicating six (6) lots
in conformance with all RS-7200 Zone site development standards, shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the
Office of the Orange County Recorder.
7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit No.1; provided. however. that there shall be a maximum of six (6)
lots. which shall be developed in accordance with the RS-7200 Zone site
development standards, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
1T
- ~-=_. ~
,c-
76-337
City Hall, Anaheim, Cal_iforni~.- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
8. Prior (0 the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
(:ondition Nos. 1, 2, and 6, above--mentioned, shall be completed. The pro-
visions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by
action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within
one year from the dat !1ereo" or such further time as the City Council may
grant.
9. That Condition Nos. 4 and 7, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
10. That if any building is to be erected on the Southern California
Edison Company (Sierra Electric Company) easement along the south boundary
of subject property, petitioner stipulated to obtaining a letter from said
company, approving such construction, prior to issuance of a building permit.
Miss Santalahti briefed the staff report submitted to and considered by
the City Planning Commission.
Mr. Boh Avila of AnacaJ Engineering advised he was representing the
the developer and they agree with the RS-7200 Zoning.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor
or opposition to the proposed reclassification; there being no respons~ he
declared the hearing closed.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council finds that this
project will have no significant effect on the environment and is exempt from
the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-247: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 76R-247 for
adoption allthorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the
zone to RS-7200 as recommended by the City Planning Commission, subject to
'undit[ons.
Refer to Resolutlon Book.
,\ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-27,
RS- 7200)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL ~lliMBERS;
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-247 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO. 9287, REV. NO. l(RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-27): Owner
Cruz Vargas; tract located on both sides of Waverly Drive, south of Wakefield
Avenue; containing six proposed RS-7200 zoned lots.
On motion bv Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Kott, the proposed sub-
division, Tentative Map Tract No. 9287, Revision No.1, together with its design
auo improvement, was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan, and the
CHy Council approved said tentative map subject to the following conditions
recommended by the City Planning Commission:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9287 (Revision No.1)
is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 75-76-27.
2. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
3. That street names shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
approval of the final tract map.
4. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate
by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued.
5. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satis-
factory to the City Engineer.
6. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary street
name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
7. That precise floor plans, elevations and plot plans shall be submitted
to the Planning Commission for approval prior to City Council approval of the
final trac t map.
MOTION CARRI ED.
~
I!
.~C =, ~=-._._"c.c~".~
~~.,
76-338
Ci~~ Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
PLBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-28, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 172:
(Tentative Map Tract No. 9268) Application of Texaco/Anaheim Hills, Inc., for a
change in zone from County Al to City RS-HS-IO,OOO(SC) Portion A, for property
located on the south side of Nohl Ranch Road west of Royal Oak Road was sub-
mitted together with E.I.R. No. 172.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to PC76-64, recommended that
E.[.R. No. 172, Supplementary to E.I.R. No. 80, be certified as being in com-
pliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and further recommended
approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-28, subject to the following conditions:
1. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framing.
2. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
3. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to
completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim.
4. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions
or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of
the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from
the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
Miss Santalahti reviewed the location of the property and the findings
presented in the staff report which was submitted to and considered by the
City Planning Commission. She noted that at the Planning Commission hearing
the developer did stipulate to participation in a minimum of 25% of the cost
of installation of traffic signal(s) at the intersections of Nohl Ranch Road,
Rural Ridge Road and Royal Oak Road; payment to be made at the time said
signals are determined necessary by the City Traffic Engineer. This has
been made an added condition to the tentative map.
The Mayor asked if the Applicant or his Agent was
address the Council.
present and wished to
Mr. Horst Schor, representing Anaheim Hills, Inc., stated that the proposed
development was worked out in close cooperation with the Westridge Homeowners
Association. He noted that several adjustments were made to the tract to
correspond to homeowners' requests to protect view lots. He advised that at
the Planning Commission hearing the Westridge Homeowners Association spoke in
favor of the proposed development.
In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood's stated concern that slopes proposed,
which are as high as 80 feet, would present maintenance problems, Mr. Schor
commented that there are two slopes of that height and the revised grading
ordinance provides for vehicular access at mid-point of the slope bank and
further there will be a mandatory homeowners association responsible for
maintenance of said slopes.
Brief discussion was held regarding the poor visibility at intersections
in the existing Westridge development and the fact that the Traffic Engineer
will install stop signs which will be monitored and if not ádequate, then
traffic signals will be located at the intersections.
Councilwoman Kaywood was of the opinion that a circulation study of this
area should be undertaken.
Councilwoman Kaywood further noted that there was discussion at the
Canyon General Planning Task Force that Royal Oak Road might be the alternative
to the extension of Lakeview and inquired whether any consideration had been
given in the planning of Tract No. 9268 to the possible need in the future of
widening Royal Oak Road to accommodate additional traffic.
Mr. Schor replied that Royal Oak is proposed to be a 54-foot wide
collector street, with two travel and two parking lanes. He explained that
it would not be possible to merely widen Royal Oak Road to provide an arterial
highway, that the street gradients, curvature and alignment of the road would
be entirely different and would change the configuration of this proposed
project. He also noted that there would be as much opposition to the widening
of Royal Oak Road in that area as there is to the extension of Lakeview through
Peralta Hills.
1T
......,. ~.,,-~.r-..~..~.. -
.,-,
76-339
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Councilwoman Kaywood voiced her objection to voting to approve developments
such as this which may lie within the right-of-way needed to widen Royal Oak
Road and questioned whether, by approval of this particular project, the Council
would be encouraging the likelihood that Lakeview Avenue would be extended through
Peralta Hills.
Mr. Maddox stated that he did not believe Royal Oak Road could be economi-
cally widened inasmuch as it is developed on both sides for almost its entire
length and would require retaining walls and sidewalks be constructed. Further
he advised that City traffic analyses and outside consultants have indicated
that based upon the projected total development, the Lakeview Avenue extension
will be required, although whether it will be a collector street or a secondary
street would depend upon the final development. .
Councilman Seymour recalled that the Anaheim City Council has gone on
record that their current position is that Lakeview Avenue will not be extended.
He therefore felt it encumbent upon the City staff to proceed in their future
planning as though Lakeview Avenue were not going to be extended through Peralta
Hills. Councilman Seymour requested that staff take this matter into considera-
tion in future developments that come before the City Council and that they
aggressively pursue the alternatives to the Lakeview Avenue extension with
neighboring cities and governments.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
Mr. Herbert Christensen, 510BCrescent Drive, Anaheim, explained his concern
that Royal Oak Road as planned in this tract would create a traffic bottleneck.
Using the topographic model supplied by Anaheim Hills, Inc., Mr. Maddox explained
the access and traffic situation in that particular ,area. Following this dis-
cussion Mr. Christensen withdrew his objections.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 172 - CERTIFICATION: E.I.R. No. 172, Supplementary
to E.I.R. No. 80, having been reviewed by the City Staff and recommended by the
City Planning Commission to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and
the State of California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon
such information and belief does hereby certify, on motion by Councilman Seymour
seconded by Councilman Thom, that E.I.R. No. 172, Supplementary to E.I.R. No. 80,
is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City and State
Guidelines. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-248: Councilman Seymou~ offered Resolution No. 76R-248 for
adoption authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED
AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-28, RS-HS-lO,OOO(S<
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
Kaywood
Councilwoman Kaywood explained that she abstained from voting for approval
of this reclassification to reinforce the position that Lakeview Avenue so far
as this City Council is concerned will not be extended through Peralta Hills
and that City staff work with that in mind.
Mayor Thom declared Resolution No. 76R-248 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO.9268 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-28): Develope~
Texaco/Anaheim Hills, Inc.; tract located on the south side of Nohl Ranch Road,
west of Royal Oak Road; containing 132 proposed RS-HS-lO,OOO(SC) zoned lots.
T
~
7b-340
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11,1976, 1:30 P.M.
On motion by Councilman Thorn, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the proposed
subdivision, Tentative Map Tract No. 9268, together with its design and improve-
ment was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan, and the City Council
approved said tentative map subject to the following conditions recommended by
the City Planning Commission:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9268 is granted
subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-28.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval.
3. That, in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot high, open,
decorative wall shall be constructed on the top of the slope on the north
property line separating Lot Nos. 4 through 8 and Lot Nos. 127 through 132
from Nohl Ranch Road. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities
shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway
the full distance of said wall and plans for said landscaping to be submitted
to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance.
Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the
responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder; and said tract map shall indicate a reduction in the elevations
of the lots along the easterly property line to protect the view of certain lots
in the adjacent Tract No. 7566, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
6. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of
the final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and
restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
7. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the pro-
posed functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporat.Lon, byLaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
8. That street names shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
approval of a final tract map.
9. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate
by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued.
10. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site, suffi-
cient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading
\.¡Í1l be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all required off-
site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative. Positive
nssurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities will be
~ompleted prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site drainage
facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have
initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be borne
by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The re-
quired drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties through said property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be functional
throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the property to the
ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final building inspec-
tions or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may
he made available to the developers of said property upon their request.
11. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities
shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any
silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by
storm water originating from or flowing through this project.
12. That the alignment and terminal point of storm drains shown on this
tentative tract map shall not be considered final. These drains shall be
subject to precise design considerations and approval of the City Engineer.
13. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
14. That the owner of subject property shall pay appropriate drainage
assessment fees to the City of Anaheim as determined by the City Engineer
prior to approval of a final tract map.
1T
..~-..' "'."~"~~'-'~~.' '".,,~,.......,_.,
,.-
76-341
Cit
Hall
Anaheim
California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ma
11
1976
1:30 P.M.
15. That the developer of subject tract shall enter into a special
facilities agreement with the City for water facilities in the High Elevation
System, as required by Rule l5B of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and
Regulations prior to approval of a final tract map, as stipulated to by the
petitioner.
l6. That paved, vehicular access satisfactory to the Street and
Sanitation Superintendent shall be provided to all public storm drain inlets.
l7. That all cut or fill slopes along the southern tract boundary shall
be included within the boundaries of subject tract.
l8. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, the petitioner
shall submit final specific floor plans and' elevations to the City Council
for approval.
19. That no roof-mounted equipment shall be permitted. in accordance
with the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone.
20. That the developer of subject tract stipulated to participating in
the cost of installing a traffic signal(s) at the intersections of Nohl Ranch
Road, Rural Ridge Road, and Royal Oak Road. Said participation shall be a
minimum of 25% of said costs, and payment shall be made at the time said
traffic signal(s) is determined to be necessary by the City Traffic Engineer.
MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-29: Application of Pacific American
Properties, Inc., for change of zone from RS-A-43,OOO(0) to CL(O) on the west
side of Miller Street between Orangethorpe Avenue and Crowther Avenue, was
submitted together with request for exemption status from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-65, recom-
mended that subject project be declared exempt from the requirement to prepare
an E.I.R. and further recommended approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-29
subject to the following conditions:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of the street along
Crowther Avenue and 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along
Orangethorpe Avenue for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Crowther
Avenue and Orangethorpe Avenue, including preparation of improvement plans and
installation of all improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street
grading and paving, drainage facilities or other appurtenant work, shall be
complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; that
street lighting facilities along Crowther Avenue and Orangethorpe Avenue
shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities, and in
accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of
the Director of Public Utilities; or that a bond in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to
guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
3. That sidewalks shall be installed along Miller Street as required
by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications
on file in the Office of the City Engineer.
4. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60 cents per front foot along Crowther Avenue, Orangethorpe Avenue,
and Miller Street for tree planting purposes.
5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
6. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framing.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
9. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director
of Public Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
la. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 4, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions
or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of
the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from
the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
ll. That Condition Nos. 3, 5, 7 and 8, above-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
~
w
ì6-342
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Miss Santalahti briefed the Planning staff report submitted to and
considered by the City Planning Commission.
Mayor Thom asked if the Applicant or his Agent was present and satisfied
with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Mr. Victor J. Vidal, 11171 Brenda Lane, La Habra, California, replied in
the affirmative.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor
or opposition; there being no response,he declared the hearing closed.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City finds that this project will
have no significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the require-
ment to prepare an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-249: Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 76R-249 for
adoption authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
ïHAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED
AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-29. CL(O)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
Mayor Thorn declared Resolution No. 76R-249 duly passed and adopted.
Mayor Thom left the Council Chamber (4:29 p.m.) and Mayor Pro Tern Seymour
assumed Chairmanship of the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-30 (TRACT NO. 9300): Application of
Anaheim Union High School District for a change in zone from RS-A-43,000 to
RS-5000 on property located on the east side of Loara Street, south of
Broadway,was submitted together with request for exemption status from the
requirement to prepare an environmental impact report.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-66.
recommended that subject project be declared exempt from the requirement to
prepare an E.I.R. and further recommended approval of Reclassification No.
75-76-30 subject to the following conditions:
1. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framing.
2. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the
Orange County Recorder.
3. That, in order to minimize the visual impact
privacy of the existing homes to the south of subject
number of two-story homes will be located adjacent to
story homes, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
4. That development of subject property will conform to Council
Policy No. 542, pertaining to sound attenuation adjacent to railroads, and
that plans to reduce the noise level generated by the railroad shall be
submitted to the City Council for review and approval prior to introduction
of an ordinance rezoning subject property, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
5. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition No.2, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of
the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year
from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
and preserve the
property, a minimal
those existing one-
1ì
, '~,"'Ho ~,~..
'> ",_. '~- ~,~
_."'~,~, .,-..
76-343
Ci.rY..Jj~l.1..1, An,!-heim1 California -- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Miss Santalahti described the location and surrounding land uses and
zoning and briefed the staff report submitted to and considered by the City
PLanning Commission. She reported that during the Planning Connnission hearing
most of the objections received in connection with this project were related
to tIle proposed two-story homes and visual intrusion into the adjacent single-
family home tract to the south.
Mayor Pro Tern Seymour asked if the Applicant or his Agent was
and wished to address the Council.
present
Mr. Fred Kingdon, 25882 Pinewood Lane, Laguna Hills, representing Pace-
setter Homes, reviewed with Council a plot plan for the lots bordering the
single-family housing to the south of subject property and explained the
various steps taken to protect the privacy of those abutting rear yards;
primarily that these two-story units would be located a minimum of 25 feet
from the south property line; that out of 18 lots adjacent to the south tract
boundary, only 6 or 7 are proposed to have two-story homes, and only 2 would
have direct visibility into adjacent rear yards and this would be from 3 x 5 foot
windows in secondary bedrooms. The remainder of the two-story units would side
on or have garages between the residence and adjacent rear yards. Mr. Kingdon
reported that he has attempted to negotiate these problems with the adjacent
property owners and that his firm is willing to stipulate to the placement
proposed on the preliminary plot plan.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Kingdon remarked that it would
be a hardship to stipulate that no two-story homes would be located adjacent
to the south boundary inasmuch as this is the location of their larger lots
which are more suitable for two-story homes.
Mayor Thom returned to the Council Chamber.
(4:33 p.m.)
Mayor Thorn asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either in
favor or opposition.
Mr. Robert Reilly, 617 GUmar Street, and Mr. Murdock, 635 Wilde Place,
described the location of their homes on the preliminary plot plan exhibited
by the applicant and explained that they have swimming pools and would very
much object to visual intrusion into their rear yards. Mr. Reilly did
acknowledge that he was appreciative of the fact that this project would be
a single-family development.
Mrs. Christine Murdock apprised Council of the fact that Mr. Kingdon
had made attempts to contact and meet with property owners who would be
affected by his project.
At the conclusion of discussion, Mr. Kingdon, having stipulated to
conforming to the placement of homes as shown on the preliminary plot plan and
other measures as discussed, including the exclusion of windows from the
rear of certain two-story homes to reduce to the extent possible the visual
int~usion into rear yards of property adjacent to the south boundary of the
proposed tract, Councilman Seymour suggested that should this reclassification
and tentative map be approved, that prior to approval of the final specific
plans and plot plan, the applicant have written indications from these
affected property owners that their concerns have been alleviated.
Mr. Kingdon related that it would be necessary to ask for a waiver of
Council Policy No. 542 concerning certain of the lots on the east boundary
of the proposed tract and was advised it would be more appropriate to submit
saLt request at the time that specific floor plans and final map are presented.
There being no further persons who wished to speak, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council finds that this
project will have no significant effect on the environment and is exempt from
the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED.
11
.~~',~.~,--"~.
._-~.
76-344
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-250: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-250
for adoption authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing
the zone as requested subject to the conditions recommended by the City
Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED
AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-30, RS-5000)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
Mayor Thom declared Resolution No. 76R-250 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO. 9300: Developer, Pacesetter Homes; tract located on
the east side of Loara Street, south of Broadway; containing 116 proposed
RS-5000 zoned lots.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, the
proposed subdivision, Tentative Map Tract No. 9300, together with its design
and improvement,was found to be consistent with the City's General Pla~ and
the City Council approved said tentative map subject to the following condi-
tions reconnnended by the City Planning Cornmission:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9300 is granted
subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-30.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
5. That street names shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
approval of a final tract map.
6. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate
by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued.
7. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
8. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
9. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director
of Public Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
10. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, the petitioner
shall submit final specific plot plans, floor plans and elevations to the
City Council for approval; and that said plans shall indicate a minimal number
of two-story homes to be located adjacent to those existing one-story homes,
in order to minimize the visual impact and preserve the privacy of the
existing homes to the south.
11. That prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, the owner(s)
of subject property shall submit plans for City Council review and approval
showing the steps taken by the developer to reduce the noise level generated
by railroad traffic to 65 dbA in the rear yards of the lots adjacent to the
railroad (Lot Nos. 9 through l4 and 42 through 45) and to 45 dbA inside the
homes with windows and doors closed. The sound-attenuation devices shall
include a six-foot high earthen berm topped by a six-foot high, decorative
masonry wall, plus whatever additional measures are necessary to achieve the
levels stated above, as stipulated to by the petitioner. These plans shall
be certified by a recognized acoustical expert stipulating that the proposed
sound-attentuation measures will achieve the levels stated above.
MOTION CARRIED.
1r
."._o,,~._",.__., .
.' '...0. ..~_._~.."._-
".,-"
76-345
~~¡l_~~ll, A~aheim, Ca!.Uor':::2è~-~J.¿9_U}'¡_CIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
PUBLIC JŒARING =--t{ECLAS-,?lFICAl.:Ji~~ N(2..--1~j'6-:-_L?_: Application initiated by the
ìnaheim City Planning Commission for a change of zone from RS-A-43,000 to
RS-7200 for property Located on the south side of Burton Street, west of
\cacia Street (Portion A); and property located at the southwest corner of
P:inewood Avenue and ¡\¡:acia Street (Portion B),was submitted together with
request for exemption SUlCUS [rom the requirement to prepare and environmental
j rnpac t report.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-67,
reported that the Planning Director has determined that the proposed
activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, of the City
.)f Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact report
md is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file said
report and further recommended approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-32
in part, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 30 feet in width from the centerline of the street along
Burton Street and 32 feet in width from the centerline of the street along
Acacia Street for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along Burton
Street, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all
improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving,
drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; and that a bond
in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted
with the City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned
requirements.
3. That either:
(a) street lighting facilities along Burton Street shall be installed
as required by the Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance with
standard plans and specifications on File in the Office of the Director of
Public Utilities, or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the
City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation
of the above-mentioned requirements: or
(b) that the owner(c;) of subject property shall pay to the City of
~aheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Burton Street for street
lighting purposes; whichever is determined to be most appropriate by the
jJjrector of Public Utilities.
4. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
th~ sum of 60 cents per front foot along Burton Street, Acacia Street, and
Pinewood Avenue for tree planting purposes.
5. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director
of Public Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance
f a building permit.
6. That sidewalks shall be installed along Acacia Street as required by
t hl' City Engineer and Ln accordance with standard plans and specifications
un file in the Office of the City Engineer.
7. That either:
(a) street lighting faciJ ities along Acacia Street and Pinewood
Avenue shall be installed as required by the Director of Public Utilities,
and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the
Office of the Director of Public Utilities, or that a bond in an amount
dnd form satisfactory to the City \Jf Anaheim shall be posted with the City
t c) guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirements: or
(b) that the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Acacia Street and Pinewood
Avenue for street lighting purposes; whichever is determined to be most
appropriate by the Director of Public Utilities.
8. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as
~dch parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel;
provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing
parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council
for a lot split.
9. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void
by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with
within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City
Council may grant:.
1T
'-c"~"""-~"..,,,,="-.. . '"-.-
76- 346
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11,1976, l:30 P.M.
10. That Condition No. b above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior
to final building and zoning inspections.
Miss Santalahti reviewed the locations of both Portions A and B as well
as the surrounding land uses and zoning. She related that because of opposi-
tion expressed by the property owners to this action, a parcel of property
was removed from Portion A by the City Planning Commission, said parcel being
.8 acre in size and located adjacent to the Orange County Flood Control
District Channel on the south side of Burton Street.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor
or opposition to the proposed reclassification.
Mr. Bert Toth, 1146 Louise Drive, Anaheim, Agent for the owner of property
located at Pinewood and Acacia, which is a portion of subject property, read a
letter which he had forwarded to the City's Electrical Superintendent requesting
that the City accept street light fees rather than installation of said lights
to satisfy Condition No.3 as set forth in City Planning Commission Resolution
No. PC76-67, inasmuch as this is an isolated piece of property and no construc-
tion is proposed. He advised that he has not had any definitive decision on
this matter and would appreciate the Council's consideration of acceptance of
this fee as satisfaction for this condition.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being
no response, he declared the hearing closed.
Prior to action by the Council, Miss Santalahti reviewed that the
Planning Staff had attempted to explain to owners of the .8-acre parcel which
was removed, the effect of a resolution of intent to rezone their property
and that it would permit them to retain said property in the agricultural
zone until such time as they desire to split into two parcels. She noted
that staff was evidently unsuccessful in their explanation to the property
owners but she requested that Council take note of the situation in their
consideration of the reclassification petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman
Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council ratified the
determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, of the City of Anaheim
Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an E.I.R.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-25l: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-251
for adoption authorizing the necessary ordinance changing the zone as
recommended by the City Planning Commission, subject to the conditions re-
commended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT TITLE l8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-32,
RS- 7200)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-25l duly passed and adopted.
On
Council
located
satisfy
motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the
directed that street light fees be accepted in connection with
at Pinewood and Acacia in lieu of installation of said lights,
Condition No.3 of Resolution No. 76R-25l. MOTION CARRIED.
City
property
to
FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 7137: Develope~ Sant Construction Company; tract located
on the north side of La Palma Avenue, east of Fairmont Boulevard; containing
28 proposed RS-5000 zoned lots.
11
~.,C,,".....".~~"--,. -"..~, .,-......,~.~.,.,.~ -
...'", ,,-...
76- 34 7
Ci
.1l.él)1-2-.:'~ndheim..-L Cd 1í ~~_r.~1ji.l.::- COL'l1CLI~'ilkÐJTES-= ~1a.:.L-.l~..-L 1976, 1: 30 P. M.
The City Engineer recommends approval and reported that said final map
. unf'Jrms substantialI\' wi. th the tentative map previously approved, that bonds
¡d'~ebeen forwarded to the ,~iLy Attorney for approval and required fees paid.
On motion hy Councilman Roth. seconded hy Councilman Kott, the proposed
,ubdivision, together with its design and imprové>ment, was found to be con-
sistent with the City!s General Plan, and the City Council approved Final Map,
ract N"o. 7í3ì,as recommended by the City Engineer. Councilman Seymour
.!bstained from voting. To this motion Councilwoman Kaywood voted "no".
MOTION CARRIED.
ANAHEIM PACIFIC STATES BAND REVIEW - REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION: Mr. Julius
Dallman, Executive Director Anaheim Pacific States Band Review, addressed the
Council in connection with his request for sponsorship by the City of Anaheim
for the Annual Anaheim Pacific States Band Review to be held at Anaheim Stadium on
November 13, 1976. Copy of an estimated budget totaling $4,875 was submitted
together with this request. Mr. Dallman pointed out that the City has gone
on record by sponsoring this event for the past two years and indicated he
would appreciate any financial participation authorized in addition to the
use of the Show Wagon and 0. boom truck.
During brief discussion the Council generally indicated interest in some
participation but preferred to consider this expenditure as part of the over-
all 1976-77 Budget, rather than authorize same out of Council Contingency Fund.
At the conclusion of discussion, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded
by Councilman Seymour, the City Council indicated interest in participating
in the Pacific States Band Review to be held November 13, 1976, as co-host
with financial sponsorship of at least the sum spent last year ($l,l06) in
addition to the use of the Show Wagon, gratis, with final determination on
funds to be made during consideration of the 1976-77 Budget. MOTION CARRIED.
TEl'!P°RA.RY TENTS - ANAHEIM ST6.QJ.IJM - HDO P~ODUCTIONS, INC: Miss Santalahti
submitted request of Mr. William Haller, Vice Presiden~ HDO Productions, Inc.,
è'Jr Counci.l approval "f the use of three tents at the Anaheim Stadium from
1'1av 1¿~ to May 23, 1976 in connection with a Recreational Vehicle Show. She
dvised in accordance with (:ouncil Policy No. 605 pertaining to tents,
i'ir. Haller has obtained approvals for the tents from the Fire Department,
Public Works Department and Building Division and it is, therefore, recom-
mended hy the Planning Department that the request be approved subject to the
dPplicant securing approval i»m the City Attorney's Office and Police
'¡,.?partment.
On motion by Councilman ioth, seconded by Councilman Thorn, the City
ouncil granted approval for the use of three tents at the Anaheim Stadium
the HDO Productions, Inc., for the period Hay 14 to 23, 1976, subject to
approval by the City Attorney and Police Department. MOTION CARRIED.
PRUPOSED BUDGET 1976-77 -: PUBLIC HEARING: On motion by Councilman Thorn,
seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council set the public hearing date
()y the proposed 1976-77 Budget for June 8, 1976 at 2:30 p.m. NOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AREAS FROM PROJECT ALPHA: Mayor Thorn read a
prepared statement indicating that since the adoption of Redevelopment Project
Alpha in 1973, most of the Project area ease of Imperial Highway and the area
:,;(\uth of the Santa Ana River ;laS undergone private development and improve-
ment, and it is probable that the remaining undeveloped property in the area
wIll develop privately without the necessity of its continued inclusion within
the Redevelopment Project area. The statement proposes that the Redeve.lopment
Plan for Project Alpha be amended 1.0 exclude 634 acres. a portion of which is
lncated south of the Santa Ana Riv~~r and a portion of which is located east
of Imperial Highway, on which are located 765 existing dwelling units, from
the Project Alpha area. (Comp:ete statement on file ìn the Office of the City
('Jerk.)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-252:
adoption.
Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-252 for
Refer to Resolution Book
11
'.'." ".".~-~_. -
v~~'".c,.,
._-
76-348
CiΠHall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P_'1!.~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DIRECTING THE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION TO INSTITUTE PROCEEDINGS TO CONSIDER
THE AMENDMENT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ALPHA
TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN LAND FROM THE PROJECT AREA.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-252 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Roth left the Council Chamber. (5:30 P.M.)
ACCESS RIGHTS - LOTS 144 AND 145, TRACT NO. 2779: The City Attorney reported
that the City acquired all of the access rights to Euclid Street in connection
with Tract No. 2779, but that Council indicated at that time theYwere amenable
to granting some points of access although these were never fixed on a parti-
cular parcel. The property owners now wish to develop and in order to fix
the access points,a grant deed has been prepared, with the concurrence of the
Traffic Engineer, designating the access points to Lot Nos. 144 and 145 of
Tract 2779. (Property located on the west side of Euclid Street, south of
Ball Road).
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-253:
for adoption.
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-253
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A GRANT DEED OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ON LOTS l44
AND 145 OF TRACT 2779 ON EUCLID STREET TO TODD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND J. A.
STEWART DEVELOPMENT CO.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Thom
None
None'
Roth
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-253 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Roth returned to the Council Chamber. (5:35 P.M.)
EMPLOYMENT OF COUNSEL - CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS: (Fairmont Boulevard; Allee Bros)
Mr. Watts presented the proposed agreement which would employ the law firm of
Oliver, Stoever and Laskin to represent the City in condemnation proceedings already
authorized by the Council. He explained that he recommends this firm be utilized
for these actions inasmuch as they are experts in the field and further, due to
the current work load in his office.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-254:
adoption.
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-254 for
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES. (Oliver, Stoever and Laskin)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-254 duly passed and adopted.
1ì
. ,
-............_..~~......,..,.-..,-"~..,....~,--- -
-~..."._-
76-349
~~~t~~I!'~.!}--L An~tl~iITll C~lJ~.9.II1.ii~-=_CO_¡¿NCIL-!"1IN1~T!=S -lf~ LL, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
f{_E.:,>OLUT1!2N NO. 76R-:-25~_- ..!~~AHElM HI~¡~~~BJ;;)iliTION NO. 17: (Uninbabi ted) Pursuant
to authority granted by the Local Agency Formation C:ommission,Resolution No. 76-50,
. ouncUman Thorn offered Resolutton No. 76R-255 for 1doption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COlTNCLL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE
ANNEXllTION TO no: CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGT\TATED
ANAHEIM HILLS NO. 17 ANNEXó,TTdN.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCn MEMBERS:
COUNC IL ME}1BERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-255 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-256 - AGREEMENT-ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT:
- .
(Fullerton Creek Channel, Kimberly Storm Channel). In accordance with
mendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Thorn offered Resolution No.
for adoption.
recom-
76R-256
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
fu~D THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RELATING TO THE IMPROVEMENT
OF FULLERTON CREEK CHANNEL AND KIMBERLY STORM CHANNEL.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-256 duly passed and adopted.
STATUS REPORT - FLOOD MAPS: Hi.'3s Santalahti reported that both HUD and Firemen's
Fund have received their official copies of Anaheim's revised flood plain maps.
B~cause of a considerable delay in getting copies of these at other agencies
the Planning Department has printed a supply and they are available to the
public for 50 cents per set. The lending institutions are accepting these
cupie,:; and refunds are being processed on the basis of same.
By general conse;]t the City Council directed that this matter be removed
[,'¡ill the "unfinished business" section of the agenda, the documentation for
processing of refunds now being available.
REQFEST FOR SUPPORT - AB_P52: The request submitted at the Council meeting of
May 4, 1976 by the Orange County Transit District for support of AB 2752
the Anaheim City Counctl was removed from the agenda pursuant to further
communication from the Orange '~ounty Transit District, advising that the bill
has been taken back under submission by Assemblyman Richard Robinson.
CONSENT ClI.LENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman
Kuit, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports
and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
C:ai.endar Agenda:
1. AMUSEMENT DEVICES PERMr~; The following permit was granted subj ect to the
reconnnendation of the Chief of Police:
a. Amusement devices permit for two coin operated machines to be located
at The French Quarters, 919 South Knott Avenue (Roy L. Kelley, Applicant).
2.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed.
a. Community Center Authodty - Minutes - April 19, 1976.
h. LAFCO - Minutes - April 14, 1976.
c. Anaheim Golf Course Ac:visory Commission - Minutes - April 12, 1976.
MOTI ON CARRIED.
11
,--'"~_.._.'" .
76-350
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
AHFP PROJECT NOS. 741, 789 AND 801: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by
Councilman Kott, the Mayor and City Clerk, on behalf of the City of Anaheim,
were authorized to execute the following right-of-way certifications; as
recommended by the City Engineer:
1. Right of Way Certification for Projects Nos. 741 (R/W) and 789 (Const)
Fairmont Boulevard, Santa Ana Canyon Road to Canyon Rim Road.
2. Rieht of Way Certification for AHFP Project No. 801, Lincoln Avenue
from Sunkist Street to State College Boulevard.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-257 THROUGH 76R-259: Councilman Kott offered Resolution
Nos. 76R-257 through 76R-259, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with
the reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member
and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-257 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION.
(Walnut Canyon Mutual Water Company; Henry Del Giorgio, et al.; Nick
Pokrajac, Inc.; Alice D. Betzsold; Terry R. Hoskins, et ux.; Vincenzo
Lanni, et al.; Rajendra G. Desai, et ux.; Elbert F. Christensen, et ux.;
Witness Lee, et ux.)
RESOLUTION 76R-258 - FINAL ACCEPTANCE WORK ORDER NO. 766-A: A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND
THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND
ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE
PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: MODIFICATION AND INSTALLATION OF PEDESTRIAN
SIGNAL INDICATIONS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK
ORDER NO. 766-A. (Trascon, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-259 - WORK ORDER NO. 778-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER}1INING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN-
IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AND SAFETY LIGHTING
INSTALLATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF LAKEVIEW AVENUE AND RIVERDALE AVENUE,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 778-B;APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS,
PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF:
AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF. (Bids to be opened June 10, 1976, 2:00 p.m.).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-257 through 76R-259, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-260 - AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO. 868: In accordance with
recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Thorn offered Resolution
No. 76R-260 awarding Work Order No. 868 to the lowest qualified bidder.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER-
FOR}1ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: JUAREZ PARK PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
WORK ORDER NO. 868. (R. J. Noble, $37,l06.35)
1T
~-,,----.._"~_c .'. Co_.~'". -,~-- '-"'C.c,~-<~--
'--".,-,-- ,~"._..
76-351
~:.l~t}~la,~ AnaheLII1..L Ca)JfoEI1..L9...::__COUNCIL MINUTES - May 11, 1976, 1: 30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEHBIRS: Kavwood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
NOES: COUNCIL ME.HBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL t-IEHBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-260 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NOS ~_Z:U1- THROUGH_)S3J:
through 3537 for adoption.
C,Juncilman Seymour offered Ordinance Nos. 3532
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3532: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH AHENDING TITLE 4
BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 4.31 TO THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
BUSINESS REGULATIONS. (FIGURE HODEL STUDIO ESTABLISHMENTS)
ORDINANCE NO. 3533: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3
CHAPTER 3.52, SECTION 3.52.010 OF THE ANAHEIM HUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO
BUSINESS LICENSES, PUBLIC BATHS.
gRDINANCE NO. 3534: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4,
CHAPTER 4.29 OF THE ANAHEIM ~fu~ICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO APPLICATION FEE,
:~SSAGE ESTABLISHHENTS.
ORDINANCE NO. 3535: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3
OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 3.54, SECTION 3.54,010
PERTAINING TO BUSINESS LICENSES, MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT OR SIMILAR BUSINESSES.
ORDINANCE NO. 3536: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH AMENDING TITLE 3
OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 3.53, SECTION
. -13.010 PERTAINING TO BUSINESS LICENSES FOR MODELING STUDIOS OR SIMILAR
BUSINESSES.
(~f3.DINANCE__NO~?}.2: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SUB-
SECTION 18.61. 020. 280 OF THE ANAHEIH MUNICIPAL CODE AND ENACTING A NEW
SUBSECTION 18.61.020.280 IN ITS PLACE.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
[~one
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 3532 through 3537, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
ORD 1 NANCE NO. 3538:
Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 3538 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
A~~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (60-6l-84(l) - HL)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUN ClL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3538 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3539:
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3539 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
A...'J ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF A1\iAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69(73) - ML)
1r
.~~."~>~,-,~ ,-
-,.,...
76-352
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May ll~ 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3539 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3540:
Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3540 for adoption.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-44(16) - RS-5000)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
Kaywood
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3540 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3541:
Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 354l for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (74-75-31 - RM-2400)
FUNDING FOR ANAHEIM STATE MISDEMEANOR PROSECUTIONS: In response to Councilwoman
Kaywood, the City Attorney reported that the County Staff has included in the
discretionary portion of the budget a sum of approximately $72,000 to $75,000 for
refund to the City of Anaheim for State misdemeanor prosecutions handled by
the City Attorney's Office. This budget is now scheduled for public hearing
before the Board of Supervisors in the second week of Jun~ and it would be
appropriate for the City of Anaheim to be represented at said hearing. It
was determined by the Council that Mayor Thom would attend.
DRIVING RANGE - H. G. "DAD" MILLER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE: Councilman Seymour
introduced the recommendation received from the Golf Course Advisory Commission
that the Flood Control District property located adjacent to the H. G. "Dad" Miller
AnaheimMunicipal Golf Course be utilized for construction of a driving range.
He requested that this matter be taken into consideration during the 1976-77
Budget deliberations and Mr. Talley advised that it has already been placed on
the list of items to be considered.
QUARTERLY MEETINGS - CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS: Councilman Seymour commented
on the communication problems experienced by the Council with the various
boards and commissions and suggested that Council Members consider the
possibility of establishing regular quarterly joint meetings with the various
City boards and commissions, with the understanding that if, in fact~
no meaningful business is pending, the meeting for that particular quarter
be suspended. He requested that the Council members think this suggestion
over for future discussion.
COUNCILMAN ROTH: Councilman Roth requested that a list containing names of
members of all City boards and commissions be forwarded to him.
Councilman Roth further requested that certain agendas and correspondence
not be forwarded to him in order to cut down the amount of páper work which he
receives weekly. A list of those items which he prefers not to receive will be
submitted to the City Clerk's Office.
SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 8: Mayor Thorn suggested that the Council support
Proposition 8 on the June 8, 1976 primary ballot, which would permit State
and Local governments to deposit funds in savings and loan institutions
thereby stimulating housing activity by expanding the financial base of the
savings and loan industry which is the leading source of funding for
housing construction and purchasing. He pointed out the influence this
could have on the success of any housing or community development program.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-261:
for adoption.
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-26l
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM URGING SUPPORT OF
PROPOSITION 8 ON THE JUNE 8~ 1976, BALLOT.
1T
....".._..'.~,..~...,_."
""'~'".'.'~-- ...
-'-._,,~,-..
'-."
76-353
C~~-t,L.]~JJ,.LAnaheim, Califon~~__---_COlJBCI~)INUTES - May 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-26l duly passed and adopted.
Adjourned:
7:00 P.X.
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of the Assistant City Hanager,
Councilman Seymour moved to recess to Executive Session. Councilman Thom
seconded the motion. HOTION CARRIED. (6:06 P.H.)
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Kott moved to adjourn.
the motion. HOTION CARRIED.
ALONA M. HOUGARD, CITY CLERK
By:
, . \ ,'."'1'...:: {..j. r .' .
~ "" ~'.h ~-"'=' ". ,
lì
Councilman Seymour seconded
Deputy
. -.C.A~C'~~"._~-"-"~".,,.-.
--".,