1976/06/29
76-451
City 1!all, AnaheiT'1, C:a]ifornia - COUNCIL HrmTES - June 20,1071;, J:1n P.H.
The City ~ot1ncil of the City of Anaheim met in rer;nlar session.
PPJ~ S T~"rr :
^' T~~ E":1' :
COUNCIL Hf.HT)ETlS: r:aYVJoo¿¡, Spymour, Kott, Rot}" and ThOM
COU~TCIL ~'fr,}ŒFrtS: none
ASSISTANT CITY !vfAN'AG~R: Pilliam (). Talley
CI'r~ ATTOR~TrY: Alan R. !"atts
DEPUTY CITY C1ERY-: Ljnòa n. Poherts
UTILITIES nIR~r.TnR: Crordon Poyt
PARr~, RECRENrI()lT, "~'1n THE APT~ nTPFCTf)R: Jailes T{uth
HANPOFER PLAJ'-P'Tf.R: T.Ti111am JTephurn
PUnT.IC TJORKf"., D1RF.CTf)R: Thornton Piersall
DEPPTY r:ITY ,^,T'r(rpNf.Y: Frank ^. Loprv, Jr.
DAT1\ PPJ')CP~~PW, nIREeJ'()P: YE':ith Parkyn
~o~nNG SUPERVI~np': hnni1~a Santalahti
n~[SE"~T :
Mayor T~OM called t~e ~eetinr to oròer a~d wel~oMed t},ose in
nttendance to thE' ~ouncil me€'tin~.
T"TUnC;\,"Im7: ^ spec ial t11ree pé1rt invocat ion ':"<1S given ry Pastor <::teiff of
~rRce Lutheran Churc~, ~onsirnor ~n]~or of St. rec~1in'R Po~An Catholic Church,
rruC'tin, and Rtl.1--bi r'.oodpin.
r"LÞr, C:;,\J-rTF: f'ounC":flM3Tl Pjl1Jar T. r'ott lcd t1- c 1\~seT1rly 1n the T>ledçe of
'11pninnce to the Flar.
"::~nLU"'In': '1F RFVv.l\nTf - n~l")rpp~rnF'rr:r nAY, 1 Q7f,¡: LA special resolution
en;oininr <1nc1 encollrafinr: the cjtl7..ens of /'f1a~eiYl to 1)e~in Tnrlependence Day,
, n7c, 1-;:'1 reeting in the chHrcl1(1~ ('\+ t'l,eir l"hoice ~.Jas unanÜ'ously approveri ty tt,C'
'T'pl"ciT" r{tv rouncil And prC'sctltC'd to T>ûr;tor ~teiff, 'fons1f.nor ~¿l.lr'on and Panl1i
r;()(ìi4'dn.
~<rT;"-::.: 1finlltes of the ~n:1he:tM rity r.ouncil ref'uL~r T"eetinr heli! June 1, 1"7("
nere1.pproved ý;rith corrections (typorrapnical errors) on rmtion l'y r.ouncilponAn
':.1~T\'lOOr1, ~I?conded by Councilman Path. F()T10~-r r,~T~RTfD.
~'\ Tprp)F nrf.DPTr: - ()PJ)Tn^JTrr~ t\1ID RE~nL(TTI()~T~: Counci lýlOTnan Kavwood moved to
qé'.ivp the readinr- in full of all ordinances ::Inñ re~olutionst and that consent
t () the pa:iver of read ing is here~y pivf"n by all r,ounc j1 1\fetr'hers unless, after.
reH(linrr of the title, speciftc request is made by A Council ~fp.M1;er for the
rpn~inr of suc~ or~inRnce or resolution. ~ounci1roan Thom spconded the ~otion.
H('\'¡'TrV'1 pnAìJIMoUSL Y CARRIED.
pr:T>npT - FPTN'.w,IJ'lL DEMAnDS AGAT'JST THE CITY: DeMands apainst the r'.ity in the
.'IT'10unt 0 f ~ '31;? ,145. 71 in accordance ",i th the 1 q7 5- 7 F 11uctret r<Jere .qpproved.
Rr:~J'LrTI()~1 nos. 7(,R-351 A~n 7fH-354 - "P,EIHBURSEMf.NT .AC,REf}TP'TTS - TEXACO AnAHEIM
HILL~ PIC.» HFSTFIELD D1<:VELOPMEfTT COMPANY I I~iC.: Upon receipt of recoMmenda-
tions suhnitted hy the Utilitip.s nirector daterl .Tune 15, IQ7ó and June lA,
1°7F, pertaininp: to reimhursf!ment agrel"rnents with 'T'exaco Anaheim Hills, Inc.
and Vestfield Development Company for special water facilities in accordan~e
"rj tli nule 15 of the Pater Rules, Rates and Repulat ions, (said recommendations
on file in the Office of the City Clery), ~ouncilman ~e)~our offered ~eso1ution
"Tos. 7fíP.-353 and 7óR-15l. for arloptlon.
~efer to Resolution Book.
RESO1UTION ;10. 7óR-353: A RESOLUTIO~T ()F THE CITY COUNCIL ()F THE CITY OF
A~"rAHEIM APPROVING THE TER}1S Ar--ID CONDITIONS OF AN AGREF:~ŒNT l-lITH TEXACO ANAlTFIH
HILLS, THC., IN CONnECTION \JITH REIMBURSEr-Œ~TT OF COSTS FOR A SPECIAL PATER
FACTT.ITY, AND .AUTTIORIZI~~ THE HAYOR N'ID CITY CLF.~K TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEHENT.
(Parkvie",' Pumpinp. Station)
RI:Sf'LUTION NO. 76~-354: ^ RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF
¡\NPPEP1 APP110VINr, THE T~RMS ANn CONDITIONS OF AN AGRF.E}fENT APPROVING THE TFR}1f".
A).m CONflITIONS OF AN AGREEi"ŒNT Rf.TT'7EEN ~'1f.c)TFIELD T)EVELOP!vfF,1\TT CONPANY, TNC., ANn
TPf CITY OF AnAHEIM IN CONNFCTION l"~I'rn REIHRUR~R!vfF.NT FOR SPECIAL HATER FACILT-
TIES A:ID AUTHORI7ING TBE NAYOR ArID CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID ^GRFE~mNT.
(Tract ~ro. R455)
1T
.r
_;.:.._m_.._- =...",~""ccc-"c;c=-~--:~-«-,-, ,-~~ ... ..
..,..-"~--._,,-"
7(..-1.1)'"
City Fall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL HIf\1HTFS - June ?Q, lQ7fi, 1:3() P.M.
~oll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMßERS:
COUNCIL MF.MBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution ~os. 76R-353 and 7~R-354 duly
passed and adopterl.
EMPLOYME!TT OF OLYMPIC PRODUCTIONS - TECHNICAL PRODUCER: Hr. James Ruth reported
on the recommended apreernent to employ Olympic Productions to produce
theatrical performances to be given at City parks during the summer months, the
budget for these items having been adopted earlier in the fiscal year.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-3~5:
adoption.
Counctlwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 76R-355 for
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTIIORIZING THE MAYOR
AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMFNT FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF OLYMPIC
PRODUCTIONS AS A TECHNICAL PRODUCER.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
'1()£S :
ABSENT:
COUNC It MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, SeYMour, Kott, ~oth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-355 duly passed and adopted.
PARK IN-LIEU FEES: Mr. Ruth verbally reported on the recommendation dated June
22, lQ76, and on file in the Qffice of the City Clerk, that park in-lieu fees
be increased 31.6% per single-family d","elling units, condominiums and mobile
homes. and 54.q2~ for apartments. He noted the unanimous support given this
recommendation by the Parks and Recreation Commission on June 17, 1976.
A letter in support of the in-lieu fee increase was also received from R.
Kenton Hines on behalf of the Board of Trustees of the Anaheim Union High
School District.
Mr. Ruth summarized that the fees which would be generated by these
proposed increases are needed to meet the goals established by the Parks,
Recreation and the Arts Department's S-year projection of 2.27 acres of
developed park land per thousand population and to reduce the existing back log
in park development. He reviewed the survey conducted of various Los Angeles
and Orange County cities indicating that Anaheim's standards are minimal com-
pared to some communities, and that this City's in-lieu fees are lower, even
with this proposed increase, than several Orange County cities.
Councilman Roth pointed out that there is usually a variation between
established park standards and actual development and contended that if the
figures for actual development in Orange County communities were compared with
Anaheim, it would show that this City has done a remarkable job and does not
compare badly with the other communities. He stressed that he is opposed to
increasing park in-lieu fees because this additional cost increment will be
added onto the eventual cost of a home, whereas he felt the City Council should
seek ways to reduce the ever-increasing cost of housing. He urged, instead,
that the City Council adopt a standard for developed park lands which is real-
istic and within economic reach of the community.
Mr. Ruth advised that there is tremendous pressure within the community
for development of that park land which the City has already acquired.
Councilman Seymour stated that he sympathi~es with Councilman Roth's
post t ion as it would relate t,o the raising of any fees which would have a nega-
tive impact on housing. He recalled that his voting record would indicate he
voted "no" on the last in-lieu fee increase in September of 1Q75. However, his
" " h f d
no vote at t at time re lecte the opinion that the Parks, Recreation and the
Arts Department had not taken sufficient steps to produce economies in their
administration and programs, ,and, therefore, was not justified. However, at
1T
>""'e~ ~ ~o'
~ """"""...U""""",,",,,Cj\J. r~"'.
-~""..'
7(,-453
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MImTTES - June 2Q. 197~. 1:30 P.M.
~ his t ir:\e, Councilman Seymour indicated that he felt the proposed increase to
be realistic and necessary to keep pace with the increasing population of the
City as it annexes eastward toward the Riverside County line. If the City
administration is not willin~ to accept the responsibility of providin~ park
and other services for that growing area. then the City should adopt a
different approach toward annexations.
At the conclusion of discussion, on motion by Councilman Thorn, seconded by
Councilman Seymour, the City Attorney was instructed to prepare the necessary
ordinance to increase park in-lieu fees by 31.6~ for single-family dwellinr
units, condominiums and mobile homes, and 54.92~ for apartments, as recom-
mended. Councilman Roth voted "no". MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTIon NO. 76R-356 THROUGH 76R-363 - SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING - CETA TITLE I AND
TITLE II PROGRAMS: Upon receipt of report from the Assistant City Manager and
Manpower Planner ~'¡illiam Hepburn, Councilman Kott offered Resolution Nos. 76R-
356 through 76R-363, both in(~lusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-356: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAlIE 1M APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE MANPO\O;T£R PROGRAM RUDGET MODIFICATION A}ID
AUTHORIlING DISBURSEMENT OF f~NDS FOR APPROVED ACTIVITIES.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-357: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIN APPROVING THE TERMS AND COr-mITIONS OF A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
tVITH NORTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF
THE TEID! THEREOF AND FOR ADDITIONAL COMPE~1SATION. (Housing Repair and
Maintenance, July 1 through September 3", 1976)
TŒSOLUTION NO. 76R-358: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE NORTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT RELATING
TO VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING SERVICES. (Manpower ..Tob Center)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-359: A RESOLUTION OF THF. CITY COUNCII4 OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIH APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM A..mJ THE NORTH ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL OCCUPATIONAL PROGRAM
RELATTNn TO A PRESCHOOL ASSISTANT PROGRAM.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-360: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ORANGE
COUNTY HANPOWER COMMISSION RELATING TO MANPOHER PROGRAMS AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT AND MODIFICATIONS THERETO ON BEHALF OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-361: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREIDŒNT BETHEEN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE I1AGNOLIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT RELATING TO THE
OPERATION OF A PUBLIC SERVICE EHPLOYME~IT PROGRAM.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-362: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEHENT BET'HEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, INC., RELATING TO THE OPERATION OF
A PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYm?HT PROGRAM.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-363: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TEID-!S AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT BET"1EEN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIH AND TIlE COUNTY OF ORANGE RELATING TO AN AUXILIARY PROGRAM FOR SUMMER
EMPLOY1ŒNT FOR YOUTH, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEnT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL f>1EMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-356 through 76R-363, both inclusive.
duly passed and adopted.
IT
,~
-TI<'.".-PC'~~;.~~.'"";=~..
...-",-.,." ,_.",
.,,-
7 f¡-4 56
City Eall. Anaheim. California - COU}JCIL MINlJTR~ - June 2(). lO7l;, l:~r) P.H.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-364 - ACCEPTING CORPORATION GRANT DEED: (Latter Day Saints
r.hurch) Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-164 for adoption.
~efer to Resolution Book.
1\ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU~rCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A CORPORATION
GRANT DEED MID ORDERING THE RECORDATION AND PAYMENT THEREFOR. (Purchase of 6
acres of property for park purposes in accordance with agreement - Church of
Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints and Natreyek Homes - Sln4,835)
Roll Call Vote:
A YI: S :
"TOES:
ARSEHT:
COUNCIL }ŒNBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
trone
none
The ~1ayor declared ~esolution No. 76R-364 duly passed and adopted.
LEASE AGREEMENT - IITDRA SE'~R CLEANER: Mr. Piersall reported on the recommended
lease of one hydra sewer cleaner unit from the City of Fountain Valley. at $300
per month, with option to pur'chase said equipment, the rental fee being
credited against the purchase: price. He advised that this rental would expand
the City's sewer maintenance program; that the equipment rental and manpower to
operate same would be CETA fi.nanced.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-365: Councilman Katt
adopt ion.
Refer to Resolution Rook.
offered Resolution No. 76R-365 for
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TEIU-ΠAND
CO!IDITIONS OF A LEASE AGREEMENT FITll THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY PERTAINING TO
THr LEASE OF A DY-NAMIC HYDRA SF.,^ffiR CLEANER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
'rOES:
ABSEnT:
COUNCIL ME~1BERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott. Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-3~5 duly passed and adopted.
MUNICIPAL DATA SYSTEMS: Mr. Keith Parkyn presented for Council consideration the
Joint Powers Agreement whereby the City of Anaheim would provide data process-
ing services to the consortium of cities in Municipal Data Systems (MDS). Also
presented were letter agreements with Security Pacific National Bank pertaining
to ~ms equipment and three lease agreements. He reported that, pursuant to
these agreements, the City would lease computers and other ~ms equipment at a
favorable interest rate (6-3/4%) over a 5-year period with six installment
payments. At the end of this period the City will have title to the equipment
and will have paid a total of Sl.306,590. He reported that nine cities have
entered into the Joint Powers Agreement for MDS services, but that La Habra is
expected to pullout on June 30, ¡q77.
In response to Councilman Kott, Mr. Parkyn advised that they anticipate no
unusual overtime activities in the Data Processing nepartment to provide these
services.
On motion by Councilman Seymour. seconded by Councilman Roth, the City
Council approved the three letter a~reements with Security Pacific National
Bank pertaining to lease of CMI STOR/145-256K Memory, Model HG2 Central
Processing Unit and Related Equipment, and IBM Computer Peripherals. MOTION
CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 7~R-366 THROUGH 76R-369: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution
Nos. 76R-366 through 76R-369, both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
1r
~
I I
~"""'""""~"'"'" ...".'...
-.""oc
7f'-455
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 29, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTIœ~ NO. 76R-366: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY DF
ANAHEI}1 PROVIDING A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ~rrTH MUNICIPAL DATA SYSTEMS. A JOINT
PO~1ERS AGENCY, PERTAINING TO T)ATA PROCE~SING SERVICES AtID AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAME.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-367: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEHENT WITH SECURITY
PACIFIC NATIONAL BAnK PERTAINING TO THE LEASE OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ANn CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. (ModellIG2
Central Processing Unit)
RF.SOLUTION NO. 76R-36B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TER1-1S AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREE1-fENT ,¡JITH SECURITY
PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK PERTAINING TO THE LEASE OF CERTAIn EQUIP}ŒNT AND
AUTHORIZING TIlE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. (IBM Computer
Peripherals)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-369: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TElUfS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT t.JITH SECURITY
PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK PERTAINING TO THE LEASE OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT A~m
AUTHORIZING TIlE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. (CMI STOR/145
156K ~emory)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEHBERS::
COUNC IL ~ŒMBERS::
COUNCIL MEHBERS::
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-366 through 76R-369. both inclusive
duly passed and adopted.
CITY LIABILITY INSURANCE: Memorandum from the City Attorney dated June 21, 1976,
(on file in the Office of the City Clerk), was submitted evaluating the four
different proposals received for the City's liability insurance. (Current
policy expires July 1. lq76)
Mr. Watts sunnnarized thatt with one exception. all proposals involve a
self-insured retention under which the City would administer its own liability
program for claims of less than $100.000. He also pointed out that there is a
degree of uncertainty as to costs in these proposals, as certain figures are
based upon estimated premiu~ls and not firm quotes. He concluded from his
analysis that Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 were those ~mich would deserve Council
considerationt andt of thes~~. he has recommended Proposal No.2 submitted by H.
H. Stabbert Insurance Inc., and further recommended that the City enter into an
agreement with Carl l.Jarren ::lnd Company to provide claims adjusting services.
He,cautioned, however, that this is really a judgmental question depending upon
what one expects could happEm in the future. and on that basis, Proposal No.1
might reasonably be accepted as well.
Mayor Thorn invited the representatives, Don Martin of Cal-Insurance, 3475
Torrance Boulevard. TorrancE~. Cal ifornia 90503. and Herb Stabbert and Ken
h1'hitney representing the H. H. Stabbert Insurance, Inc.t 1695 Hest Crescent
Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801 to ~ddress the Council, and each gave
detailed explanations as to the benefits of their respective insurance pro-
posals.
Mr. Martin emphasized that his proposal differs in that it will be on a
claims-made form. as opposed to a claims-filed form. which would ~ive the City
coverage for occurrences during the period of time that the policy was
enforced. should the claim not be reported until Ii later date. In addition,
they would be able to assist the City in a loss control program because of the
amount of business they are currently writing in municipal liabilities.
Messrs. Stabbert and vfuitney explained the difficulties in obtaining the
excess layers of insurance c:overage and the attendant delays which have
resulted. which are primarily attributable to the reactions in the current
insurance market to the reCE!nt failure of the Teton Dam. Therefore. the Halnut
Canyon Dam will probably cause portions of the City's excess liability insur-
ance premium to at least double.
If
;,~. - i.H~.':;;C---"iiC.,-~-~;-c-.:;;;..,.-._. '4"'" ,~"
~
.~~- ..-.'- "'~'~
7 (¡ -/¡ ':; 6
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 2Q, lQ76, 1:3() P.H.
In response to Councilman Seymour's query as to why certain of the premium
costs in the Cal-Insurance proposal cannot be quoted as firm, Mr. Hartin
explained that in seekinr to write the excess insurance coverage, because the
City had already issued a letter to ~tabbert as broker of record, he was unable
to nepotiate quotations from those insurance companies utilized by Stahbert.
lIe suggested that the City bind under the coverages provided by Stabbert and
request a 30-day extension, so as to permit his firM an opportunity to obtain
firm quotations for the excess layers of insurance.
Councilman Seymour expressed dissatisfaction with handling the City's
insurance decisions in this manner, i.e., immediately before expiration of the
current policy, representat1.ves of competitive insurance firms argue the merits
of their proposals at Council meetings. He stated that these decisions concern
significant amounts of money and should not be made in this environment.
Councilman Thom moved that Proposal No.2 submitted by H. H. Stabbert
Insurance, Inc. be approved as recommended by the City Attorney. Councilwoman
}~ywood seconded the motion.
Councilman Roth suggested that the City request a binder and defer
decision on the insurance proposal itself for one week, inasmuch as he is not
an insurance expert and would like more facts and figures on which to base his
dec ision.
Councilmen Seymour and Roth voted "No" to the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Seymour stated that to insure this same situation does not
occur for the third consecutive year, he would be prepared to create an
insurance commission whose duties would include evaluating insurance proposals
before these are submitted to Council for consideration.
Mayor Thom stated his belief that the way to handle the City's insurance
problems would be to employ a risk analyst to deal with the City's insurance
brokers, particularly in view of the fact that the City is now self-insured.
At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Seymour moved that the
Assistant City Manager be directed to report back to the Council in 90 days
with alternatives to presenting insurance proposals so that the Council might
have more meaningful informa.t ion on which to base such decisions. Councilman
Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood pa.rticularly urged that these last minute decisions
be avoided and that proposals for insurance or similar items be presented at
least thirty days prior to the anticipated expiration date.
RECESS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved for a five minute recess.
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:00 P.M.)
Councilman Thorn
AFTER RECESS: Hayor Thorn called the meeting to order, all Council Members being
present. (3: 07 P .H.)
UTILITIES COMMISSION: The ordinance prepared by the City Attorney's Office
Which, upon adoption, would establish a utilities commission, was submitted for
Council consideration. It y,¡ras noted that Council had received a communication
from William S. Woods, President of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, dated June
lA, 197(; containing comments on this proposed ordinance. The following items
were briefly discussed by CQiuncil in connection with the establishment of the
commission: 1) the suggesti.on that the number of members on the Board be
increased from five, as stated in the ordinance, to seven; 2) that the respec-
tive members of the commission should represent the various classes of utility
service customers; and 3) that the members of the proposed comrnission receive a
stipend or expense.
Council }tembers indicated that they felt the requirement that Board
members represent specified customer classes would be difficult to administer
since all would be members Qif the residential class category and some would, in
addition to that, be commercial or industrial customers by reason of their
business or employment.
1'£
.~
,II
", ,
,--_.. .-c-~.ccc~-oc;.-'----'."'""""11?~,-_.¥.m"',.., f.,' ~
"-""'-'
76-457
City Ball, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 29, 197(1, 1:30 P.H.
Councilman Seymour stated he was basically in agreement with recommenda-
tions discussed at the Chamber Task Force Committee meetings, except that he
felt the provision for paYITlent to these commissioners should be deleted at this
time and reconsidered in the future if it could be justified on the same basis
as the stipend-paid Planning Commissioners, i.e., the frequency and duration of
meet ings.
At the conclusion of discussion, Council Members determined to have first
reading of an ordinance which would provide for a seven-member Utilities
Commission, excluding provision for separate retail classes of customers being
represented and, further, excluding provision for payment of a stipend to the
commissioners.
ORDINM1CE NO. 3557:
readin~.
Councllman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3557 for first
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINA.1\JCE OF THE CITY OF' ANAHEIM CREATING A PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD.
RESIGNATION - AL~~ R. WATTS, CITY ATTORNEY: Mr. Watts submitted his letter of
resignation as City Attorney, effective September 10, 1976, which indicated his
intent to enter private law' practice.
Mr. Watts' letter of resignation was accepted with regret on motion by
Councilman Thorn, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-370 - AGræEMENT - FINANCIAL AUDIT, YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, ¡Q7ó,
ARTHUR YOUNG AND COHPANY: Councilman Thorn offered Resolution No. 76'R-370 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU!,¡CIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS Arm
CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT HITH ARTHUR YOUNG AND COMPANY TO PERFORM CONSULTING
SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE ~AYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYf,S:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL lmMBERS:
Kaywood. Seymour, Kott and Thorn
Roth
None
The ~ayor declared Resolution No. 76R-37Q duly passed and adopted.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, 1976-77 BUDGET: Mr. Talley reported that following his
review of budgetary figures and information presented at the Council Meeting of
June 22, 1976, he is satisfied that these are valid and that by taking a
~1,498,00O reduction in electric utilities transfer unrestricted to the General
Fund and, further, through reduction of ~721,OOO in expenses and an improvement
of approximately $420.000 in revenues, the budget would be $367,000 out of
balance. Of that amount, $165,000 could be obtained by reducing park develop-
ment and improvement, and a.nother $100,000 of this figure might be obtained by
delayinr, installation of the on-line TRES system to January 1, lQ77. These
adjustments would leave the, budget in a ~lOO,OOO deficit position, which sum,
in Mr. Talley's opinion, could be located prior to January 1, 1Q77. On this
basis, therefore, Mr. Talley recommended Council approval of the lq76-77
Budget, subject to minor adjustments.
In response to Councilman Seymour, Mr. Talley advised that revenue
projections from property taxes were predicated upon a continuation of the
$1.05 per $100 assessed valuation tax rate, and at a 15~ increase of assessed
valuation. Therefore, the City's projections are still within 2~, considering
the announcement that the valuation increase was 161.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGETS: Mr. Knowlton Fernald
submitted a modified budget for the Redevelopment Agency, noting that this
reflects the redirection given by the Council and was prepared in response to
meetings with tþe steering committee. He noted that the Agency budget shows a
IT
",.
--,
,,------~--c¡--:---,.. '~""".'L--'='.... .,- - ~-.."..1~C"""C--- -.-.--","
76-45A
City Hall, Anaheim, California - r,OUNCIL HmUTES - June ?Q, 1q7~, 1:30 P.M.
reduction in staff by four members (two Assistant Planners and two Intermediate
Tvpist Clerks). Also submitted is a gupp1ernentary 30-day hudget to extend
employment of these four personnel through July 31, 1q7~. The balance of the
Agency budget provides for the first quarter of the fiscal year only. It is
anticipated that at the end of that 90-day period the steering committee will
make recommendations and the Agency will act on financial decisions involving
the budget for the remainder of the fiscal year.
At the conclusion of discussion and comments of appreciation by Mr.
Fernald for the dedication demonstrated by the Redevelopment Agency staff, the
Council, by general consent, approved the modified Qn-day budget submitted for
the Redevelopment Agency in the total amount of ~2,43n,156, and the supple-
mentary budget to retain the four personnel to July 31. 1976; and, further,
approved the Housing Authority budget in the total amount of ~1,182,442.
ANAHEIH NEHSLETTER BUDGET: Councilman Seymour challenged the cost given for
puh1i.cation and distribution of four issues annually of the Anaheim Newsletter
(S24,522), noting that When broken down this amounts to 4.1Ç per copy, which is
an extremely low figure in today's economy. He furthermore indicated that he
was desirous of eliminating this allocation from the 197ó-77 Budget and gave
the following reasons: 1) the Hewsletter is subject to a lack of credibility;
and 2) he feels the City can depend upon the press at large to perform this
function.
Councilwoman Kaywood stated that she had received comments from the public
indicating that the AnaheiM Newsletter is the only vehicle which transmits
information about the City. She stated that she would agree to try Councilman
Seymour's proposal on the basis that if there is an important item which the
City wishes to communicate, an issue would be published. She also noted that
it mit7.ht be valuable to publish one annual "wrap-up" issue to summarize accom-
plishments and report on what is forthcoming.
Mr. Talley pointed out that the sum of ~24,522 in question covers not only
the cost of the Anaheim Newsletter but the "Anaheimer" as well. which is mailed
to City employees. He advised that he would prefer to continue publication and
mailin~ of the "Anaheimer" as a means of communication with City employees.
At the conclusion of discussion, by general Council consent, it was
determined that the appropriation for printing and distribution of the Anaheim
City :'¡ewsletter would be removed from the 1976-77 Budget and placed in the
~ouncil Contingency Fund, leaving only that portion of the $24.522 which would
cover the cost for printing and distribution of the "Anaheimer", the City
employee newsletter.
VISITOR &~D CONVENTION BUPillAU BUDGET: Councilman Kott quoted figures obtained
from a number of cities comparing the budget appropriation afforded and the
revenues directly attributable to their V and C Bureau or its counterpart. He
voiced the opinion that the budget request for 1976-77 fiscal year from the
Anaheim Area Visitor and Convention Bureau for S455,000 and the revenue
projected to be generated from these funds compares unfavorably with figures he
had quoted for such cities as San Francisco. Los Angeles, Las Vegas, San Diego
and Long Beach.
Councilman Kott also called attention to sections of the Arthur Young and
Company audit report on the V and C Rureau~ i.e.~ that during calendar year
lQ74 the V and C Bureau was responsible for 30 out of 2Q5 conventions at the
Convention Center, with direct revenues from these events amounting to
~394,OOO, which did not offset their total expenses; that Arthur Young and
Company was not certain that the City's expenditure of a lesser amount on the V
and C Bureau would result in a proportionate decrease in revenues; and that the
contract between the City and the V and C Bureau calls for the Bureau to pro-
vide services under the rlireetion of the City staff, and all items paid on
behalf of the City should be audited by the City. Councilman Kott voiced
concern that there has been no direction given to the Bureau and, to his
kno~ledge. the City has never conducted an audit of Bureau expenditures. He
stressed that he felt public accountability to be a highly important factor.
In order to obtain that level of credibility for elected officials with
the public, Councilman Kott proposed that two members of the City Council and
the Director of the Stadium and Convention Center become a part of the
1T
"C..- ~~f"""""'__""-'..Lf ,
-~'-' .
7 n -/~ '5 q
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 29, 1976, 1:30 P.H.
Executive Committee governing the V and C Bureau, and that if this is accept-
able, that the Council approve one-half of the V and C Bureau budget proposal
at this time to provide for six months of operation. During this period of
time he \~u1d also propose that a new contract be drawn up between the City and
the V and C Bureau defining more clearly areas of responsibility.
It was suggested that the Finance Director also participate with those
working on the Executive Board over the 6-month period, and also that represen-
tation from the City Attorney's Office be included in those sessions relatin~
to the new contract.
Mr. Bill Snyder, Manager of the Anaheim Area V and C Bureau, speaking on
behalf of the Board of Directors, welcomed a closer liason between themselves
and the City. He reported that the Board had unanimously approved the sugges-
tion made at the June 22. 1976 Council Meeting that the Mayor and r1ayor Pro-Ten
serve on the Executive Board, and that they were equally as anxious as the
Council for a high degree of accountability. In response to Mr. Talley's
suggestion that the Council incorporate a 10 or 60-day cancellation clause into
the contract, Mr. Snyder agreed that this is a business-like way to proceed.
He indicated that the Bureau would, however, prefer to proceed with approval of
a büdget for the full year.
At the conclusion of discussion, on motion by Councilman Kott, seconded by
Councilman Thorn, the City Council approved the appropriation of one-half of the
V and C Budget for a 6-month period, during which time two Council Members, the
City Manager, the City Attorney, the Director of the Stadium, Convention Center
and Golf Courses, and the Finance Director be appointed to the Executive
Committee of the V and C Bureau; and, further, that during this 6-month period
a new contract be '~rked out, and it be determined whether or not the full
budget request of $455,000 is necessary. To this motion Council Members
Kaywood and Roth voted "No". MOTION CARRIED.
It was determined, sinc ~ the Mayor Pro-Tem indicated that due to the
commitment he had already made to serve on the steering connnittee for
Redevelopment, he would be unable to serve and that Mayor Thom and Councilman
Kott would serve as the Counc:il representation on the Executive Committee.
UTILITY RATES: Councilwoman Kaywood questioned the reductions in working capital
to the water and electric ut:llity budgets, which amount to a total of $299,000
less. She queried Whether this left any working capital at all and why this
reduction was included.
Mr. Talley responded th;lt this reduction does severely restrict the amount
of money available, but was felt to be a better choice than raising the tax
rate when the budget was being formulated.
Mr. Hoyt concurred with Mr. Talley and added that these reductions placed
the utility at "rock bottom" and, therefore, it will be necessary to respond
very quickly to any contingency which comes up, even to the threat of a
Wholesale-rate increase, because there would be no cushion left to absorb any
increased wholesale rate. HE~ concluded that he felt the utility could get
through this fiscal year with the decreased 'WOrking capital appropriations as
presented, but, if their estj~ates are good, it is apparent they could not
withstand such a reduction in working capital next fiscal year.
Councilwoman Kaywood renlarked that she is proud of the accomplishments of
the City Council since April, 1974. and recognized the need for continued
economy; however, she cited the following reasons as factors which would bear
consideration toward the City' Council accepting and approving the budget with
the recommendation that the present 95~ of Rdison retail rate policy be amended
to a q8~ of Edison retail rate policy: 1) the expansion in size and population
of the City and attendant inc.rease in demand for services; 2) the unprecedented
and unpredictable inflation rate; 3) the finite nature of the energy supply;
and 4) the current price squeeze situation which the City faces with Southern
California Edison.
Councilwoman Kaywood called attention to the fact that the citizens of
Anaheim have benefited by almost $2.5 million in utility rates and sanitation
charges Which were not passed along by the City Council; however. since the
Council has now made a life-line rate available for those who are the most
If
-> -"",.;;c¡;.."L~~,__............ -", - o~";-,--- _. ,_.' .,.0..<0-_"'-"-4 .... .. . -""""'-",...,, - . '",'.. '..',.,"'
ì 6-/~h()
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL ~lINUTFS - June 29, 197f), 1 :30 P.>1.
hard-hit by any increased cost and since the economy has improved somewhat, she
felt it appropriate to consirler a change to the Council Policy on utility rates
to permit increase of rates to QR~ of Edison retail rates, as this would allow
the City to restore to the budget the means by which they might proceed with
some of the needed capital improvements in the park development area, land
acouisition for a new central garar-e facility and/or immerliate installation of
the TRT:S Computer billing system.
Councilman Seymour took strong exception to Councilwoman Kaywood's
position indicating that he would, as long as he remained an elected official,
continue to squeeze every cent in order to produce the highest monetary return
possible to the taxpayers. Together with this, he would support using some
prudence in order to accomplish good capital improvement projects, if possible.
He would, however, continue to oppose any "loosening-up" based upon a record of
two years of good performanc(~.
At the conclusion of discussion, Councilwoman Kaywood moved that the
Council approve adoption of a q~7 of Edison retail rate policy, as originally
recommended by the Assistant City Manager in his 1976-77 fiscal year budget
proposal.
The foregoing motion died for lack of a second.
SUPPLEHENTARY BUDGET REQUESTS: ~1ayor Thorn noted the receipt of a request from
Hr. Julius Dallman for City sponsorship of the Pacific States Band Review in
the amount of $4,875.
'fr. Dallman responrled that $4, R7 5 is the total budget for this event and
~.¡ould he the maximum amount the City could contribute.
Following brief discussion during which Council ~embers indicated they
felt the event should have broader financial representation within the
comITunity and that the City government should not provide the entire budget,
Council determined by general consent that the City would participate in this
event at least in the amount contributed last year ($1,106), but that rather
than set this expense out as a line item, that funds could be appropriated from
Council Contin~ency or Community Promotion Funds.
'10 further items from the supplementary budget requests were either
discussed or approved.
~1ayor Thorn called for any additional questions or comments froM the public
or Council Members on the proposed 1976-77 Budget, and, there being none forth-
condnrr, he declared the public hearing closed.
BUDGET TRfu~SFER: By general consent, the City Council authorized the transfer
of $62,525, representing the cost for surplus acreage and seventy acres of land
located adjacent to the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, from the Stadium-
Convention Center - Golf Course account to Parks, Recreation and the Arts
account.
SANITATIOt! RATE INCREASES: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by
Councilman ~oth, the City Attorney was directed to prepare the necessary
ordinance increasing the sanitation charges to residential customers by 30;,
and to set the charges for connnercial customers at $.25 per barrel with
increase in water closet charge to ~.80 and ~.40. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-371 AND 76R-372 - ESTABLISHING NEW JOB CLASSES:
Seymour offered Resolution Nos. 76R-371 and 76R-372 for adoption.
Councilman
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-371: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76R-314 MID ESTABLISHING ntH CLASSIFICATIONS
AND RATFS OF PAY. (Effective June 25, 1976)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-372: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIH ANENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76R-312 AND ESTABLISHING NEH CLASSIFICATIONS
N~D RATES OF PAY. (Effective June 25, 1976)
1T
i,~- ,~,--...~"H~~.=L~., '.f
"""""",-c
7(;-6(-'J
City Hall, Anaheim, California - Cr)n~'ICIL ì'lINUTf.S - June ~q, In7n, 1:1'1 P.N.
R()ll Call Vote:
AYES:
COUNC IL ~m~m[RS:
COUNCIL }m~mE~S:
COUNCIL HE~fB[RS:
Kav'I;"ood, Sevmonr, Kot t, Rotn anrl Thorn
None
None
':OES:
ABSENT:
The Mayor declarerl Resolution NOR. 7~R-371 and 7~R-37' dlIly paRRe~
and adopted.
TRANSFER TO SALARY ACCOUNT: On motion hy Councilman Seymour, seconcied hv
Councilman Tloth, the City CoLincil anthori7.ed the transfer of ~875,8"f) from
~eneral Fund unappropr1atect surplus, lo75-7~, to Salary Accounts in the lo7F-77
Budget. MOTION CARRIED.
APPROVAL OF lq7lí-77 BtTl)('.ET: On motion hv Collnc:f.lman Seymour, seconded rv
Councilman Kott, the City Council approved the nudget for the 1°7(;-77 fiscal
year amounting to a total of $111'),1',/11,/175 ',"-rÍ-tn revisions reflecting a reduction
of four personnel in the Cornnunjty Deve]onment Department; anproval of the V
and ~ Bllreau budget for six months only, and elimination of anpropriation for
printing and distrihution of four issues of the Anaheim Citv Newsletter.
'1OTION CARRIED.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITE~fS: On mot ion ny Council"'~oman Kayvrood, seconnerl ~v
Councilman Kott, the following ;}ctions tolere ::\uthorized in accordance ~.:dth thp-
reports and recommendations furnished each Council :"1emher and as listed on the
Consent Calendar Agenna:
1. CORRESPONDENCE:
filed:
The followin~ correspondence was ordered received and
a.
Community Redevelopment Commission - ~1inutes - Hav 2F anrl June 7.,
lQ7h.
h. Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission - ~anutes - May 2n, lq7~.
c. Financial and operatinß reports for the month of ~av, lo7~: Citv
Treasurer's Office, Customer Service Division, Police Department.
~. CHANGE ORDER :-10. III - \JORI: ORDER "~O. 5ílR: Change Order No. III,
increasing the contract amount for ~'¡ork Order No. 551R - Lewi.s Suhstation ~v
t)23,364.34, bringin~ the contract price to $1,lh/,2~5.81, was authorized i.n
accordance with the recommendations of the Citv Engineer. (Lord Electr::f.c
(ompany, Inc., contractor)
!10TION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION ~10S. 7ñR-173 AND 7líR-374: Councilman Roth offered Resolution '10.8
7~~-373 and 7~R-374 for adoption in accordance with the reports, recom-
mendations and certification~ furnished each Council Hernñer, and as listed on
the Consent Calendar Agenda.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-373 - FIliAL ACCEPTANCE, WORK ORDER NO. 1'538: A RESnLTJTIO'1
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINAY.L Y ACCr,PTIr-1C THE COHPT~F.Ttf)N MID
THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, HATERIALS AND EOTTIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES A!ID TRANSPORTATI()!¡ rICLtJT)INr. P()~TE~, FUEL A!'m HATER, AND THE PERFORlf-
ANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONST~UCT A"ID CO:1PLETE THE FOLLm-JING PUBLIC
IHPROVEMENT, TO l>1IT: PHASE I CO~ISTRTTr.TION AT LEHIS 230 KV SUnSTATION, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIN, HORK OP,DER NO. SC;JR. (Lorõ Electric Company, Inc.)
RESOLUTION NO. 7ñR-374 - ACCOUNT NO. 1()()-45fi-245: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AHAHEP'1 FIlmING ANn DETEreUNING THAT PURLIC CO~¡VENIE~1r,F:
AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTIon ANT) CO~WLETIO~1 OF A PUBLIC PfPRO'{,fE~E~TT,
TO l.JIT: HAINTENANCE CONTRACT FO~ TRAFFIC SIGNALS, IN THE CITY OF AHAHEP'1
ACCOUNT NUMBER 1()()-45ñ-2t~5; APP~OVINr. THE DESI(;NS, PLANS, PROFILES, nRAPINr,s
A.~D SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTIO~1 THEREOF; AUTHO~IZING THE CONSTRtTCTI()~T
OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVE:1E~¡T IN ACCORDAnCE WITH SAln PLANS, SPECIFICATION~, ETC.;
AND AUTHORIZIN('. AND DIRECTDTG THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITI!'1G
SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRTTCTIon THEREOF. (Bids to ñe onened July ~', If'47~
- /.: Of') P. H . )
1r
""...,=" .-~;~>~ ",- "<~'~-r--CWF".'""~c.,-,,. ... ""T "P'~""""~ '~",,--.,
7 (, -/¡ { :'
City !La II, An.1.heim, California - CO1TNr.IL HlnnTES - June ~(), lo7ñ, 1:3'1 P.~~.
T~()ll Call Vote:
^YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COTTNCIL HE~1BERS:
COTJ'1CIL HPŒERS:
COlTNe', IL ~tENR!"')\S:
Kaywoori, SeYMour, Kott, Roth r¡nrl Thorn
none
None
The ~ayor rleclarerl Resolution ~los. 7FR-J71 rind 7~R-174 rlulv pa~se~
and adopted.
rITY PLANNING COHMISSION ITF)fS: Actions taken hy the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held June 7, lQ7F, pertaining to the following applications were
<;uhmitted for City Council information anò consideration.
On motion by Councilman Rotl1, secondel! hv Councilman Thorn, the City
Counc il authori7.erl the act ions pprtaininr to the follm.,in?, envi.ronmental imp.'lct
requirements, as recornmenrled hy the City Planning Commission, anrl took no
further action on the following application~ (Item Nos. 1 throup,h q):
1. ENVIRONMENTAL Il'-1PACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: The Planninp, Director
has determined that the proposerl activities in the followin~ listed 7.onin?
applications fall within the definition of Section 3.n1, ClASS lor 11 of the
City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an environmentaJ impact
report and are, therefore, cateRoric.'llly exempt from the requirement to file an
EIR:
Variance No. 2~n7
Conditional Use Permit No. lñ25
~. CTVIRO~ŒNTAL IHPACT REPOr..T - ;'1EGATIVE DECLARATIOn: The Planning
rommission recommends to the City Council that the suhject pro1ect~ in the
following listed zoning applicationR be declarerl exeMPt from the reql1iremp-nt to
prepare ::in environment::il impact reT'ort, pursuant to the T'rovision of the
C~lifornia Environmental Quality Act:
Variance No. ?812
Conditional Use Permit No. l('?F
1. VA"I{IANCE :10. ?Q()7: Submitterl bv Rapt Company to construct a second free-
standing sign on ~fL zoned property located at 21f3() East Katella Avenue.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC7ñ-l12 denied variance No. 2R()7.
4. VARIM1CE NO. 2q12: Submitted hv Atlantic Richfielrl Company to establish an
automotive diagnostic center on C1 zoned propertv located at 2Rnn West Lincoln
Avenue.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC76-118 granted Variance ~o.
-),~12.
). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. If.25: Submitted by Hennen Industries, Inc. to
permit on-sale alcoholic beveraßes in a lodge on CL zonerl property located at
2131 East Ball Road.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC71i-llli granted Conditional Use
Permit No. 1~25 for a period of two years.
h. CONDITIONAL USE PER;1IT NO. ló2(;: Submitted rv Uk Ho and Chanr, Sock Ho to
permit expansion of an existing motel on CG zoned property located at ?7n North
'1anchestex Avenue.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC7n-117 Rranted Conditional Use
Permit No. 162f..
7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION - GRAT)I~tG PEIDIITS: It
was determined by the City Council that the filing for the following listert
8rading permits will have no significant effect on the environment and are,
therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact
report, as recommended by the City Planning Commission:
a. r.rading Permit filed hv Paul E. O'Kain, Jr., to construct a sinp,le-
family residence at 151 Peralta Hills Drive.
1T
u., r; ,-
. ----oc,---;-' 'C'»"".C~H_=_,.'.--r'-,'"
._Æ-
7 fi-I¡(, 1
City Hall, Anaheim, California - cnUNCIL ~njmTES - June 2°, 1°7(;, 1:1'1 P.H.
h. Grading
resirlence at 31n
c. Grading
residence at 255
Permit filer1 hv Rw:;h N. Hill to construct a ~in~lp-f:lm:U.v
South ~ohler Drive.
Permit filed hv Robert E. Barrett to con~truct a si.n~le-f:¡mily
South Peralta Hills Way.
8. G.C.D.P. ~O. Q1o: Oranße County Use Permit No. Qlq submitted hy Merlin J.
Barth for a proposed school huilrling addition to Cornelia Connelly JIigh SchonJ
located on the north si~e of Broadwav, west of Brookhurst Street, was approvpn
as submitted by the Plannin~ Commission on the hasis that said ad~itionR
conform to the site development standards of the RS-A-I~3, f)nn zone an (I are not
significant in view of their heing no increase in the student enrollment anct
1;~ould, therefore, re permissible.
No further action was taken hy the Citv Council.
~1()TI()"t\1 CARRIED.
TENTATIVE ~1AP TRACT NO. RL~OQ - REVISION NO.2 (E.I.R. NO. 171~): Developer,
Butler Housing Corporation; tract locatecl on the east side of AnaheiM Hills
Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, containing 5~ propo~ed RS-72nn zoned
lots.
~is~ Santalahti reported that Condition No. 15 imposed hv the City
Planning Commission provides for review ~y the Planning Department of t~e pro-
posed removal of any specimen trees within the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone.
ENVIRorp"ŒNTAL IHPACT RF.PO~T NO. 17/~ - CE~TIFICATIO~i: EIR No. 17b, Addendum to
EIR No. q7 which is a supplement to EIR No. Rf), having been reviewed by the
City staff and recommended by the City Planning Commission to he in compliance
with City and State Guirlelines and the State of California Environmental
l1uality Act, the City Council, acting upon such information and helipf, doe~
hereby certify on motion by Councilman Roth. seconded by Councilr:mn Sevmour,
that EIR No. 174 is in complfance with the California Environmental ~ualitv Act
and City and Stat e C;uideline!=;. 1\f()TI()~T CA~RIEn.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, the propoRen.
subdivision, Tentative Map Tract No. ~4n~, Revision Ho. ?, togEther with it~
design and improvement, was found to be consistent with the Citv's General
Plan, and the City Co\mcil approved said Tentative ~ap, su~ject to the
following condition~ recomrneTHlerl hy the City Planning Commission:
1. That should this subdivision he cleveloped as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision tnereof shall he submitted in tentative form for
approval.
2. That a comhinat ion 1andscaperl hem anrl ma~onry ~',TRll totalinp, a miniMum
height of ~ feet shall be con~tructed along the west si~e 0' Lot Nos. 1 thrO\l~h
12 and Anaheim Hills Road.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall he su~mitted to and
approved by the City Council and then he recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
5. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions sha].l he suhmitterl to
and approved by the City Attorney's Office and the City Engineer prior to City
Council approval of the final tract map anrl, f\lrther, that the approve~
covenants. conditions, and restrictions shal.1 he recorderl concurrent Iv with the
final tract map.
n. That street names shall he approved by the City Planning Department
prior to approval of a final tract map.
7. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the Citv
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the tiMe
perMit is issued.
8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site.
sufficient gradinr, is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on
grading will be permitted between October l~th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilitie~ have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall he providen the City that such drainape facilitie~
~~ill he completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-sitp
of Anaheim
he
the ht1ildin~
IT
,..
-:~=-~C""'--=:-:'--""- _.....~--
....
T"'~'" "..._-".,~,
7 (1 - /1 (, ,
City F:1J.l, '~naheim. California - COTfNr.IL NINUTFS - Jun~ ?(), ]()7h, 1~1f) ?H.
draina8e fl1.cilities shall he dedicated to the City, or tnP- Citv Council snall
hlVf' .fnitÜlted conòP-Mnation proceedjnrs therefor (the costs of Hhich c;}1Rll 'he
r)orne b~T the developer) prior to the COMrneneement of grA.(1in~ operations. Thp.
reollirecl drainage facilitip.s shall he of a s1~e anrl tvpe sufficient to carrv
runoff \vaters orig1nRting froM 1i~hp.r proT'ertie~ through sai~ !'ropertv to
ultimate clisposal as approved by tIle City Engineer. Saict drainape facilitie~
s11a11 he the first item of con~truetion anJ shall be coM~leted and be
functional throughout the tract and fron the downstream 'houndarv of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
huilòing inspections or occupancy pernits. nraina~e di~triet re1.rnhur~PMP-nt
a~reements may he made availahle to t',e developers of said property upon their
request.
Q. That grading, p-xcavation, and a1] other construction activities s~all
he conducted in such a manner so as to r1injrni~e the nossihility of any ~ilt
orip,inating from thi~ project he:ing cArried into the Santa Ann ~1ver hy storm
water oriRinating from or flowin~ thrnuph this project.
In. If permanent street name si3ns have not heen installed, temporary
street name signs shall he installed prior to any oeeupancv.
11. That all structures constructed in this tract shall meet the
rer¡ui.rements of Fire Zone No.4 as determined hy the City of Anaheim Fire
Department.
12. That the full-traveled way of the street at the ~outh side of the
tract (La Paz Way) shall be constructed with the improvements for this tract,
unless otherwise approved hy thp- City Enr,ineer.
11. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, the petitioner
shall submit final speeific floor plan~, plevations and plot plnns to the Citv
Council for approval.
14. That the eompletion nf Reelassification No. 72-71-~1 ~hall be to the
í~S- ì :->nf1 (Sr.) Zone.
15. That the proposed reMoval of any sneciMP-n treeq shall ~e su~Mitted for
review bv the Planning Denartment and shall he subject to the regtllation~
pertaining to tree preservation in the Scenic Corridor Zone-Overlav.
1 h. That mailboxes shall be provined in accordance ~'lith the reC"!uirp-ments
of the United States Post Offiee pertaininp: to curbside placement or an
alternate acceptable to t~e Post Office, as stipulated to by the petitionp-r.
17. That the petitioner 8h:111 submit a written rer¡uest for termination of
Conditional Use Permit No. 1415 prior to approval of the final tract map.
1R. That riding and hiking trails shall be provided in this tract, as may
be required and approved hy the City, and plans for said trails ~hall hp-
submitted prior to approval of t'1e final tract map, if at that time a trRils
plan has been adopted by tIle City, as stipulated to hy thp- petitioner.
lO. That a qualified archeologist shé\ll he present on the site ouring all
gradinlj activities to insure thRt no undiscovereò artifacts exist, é\S
stipulated to by the pP-titioner.
'lOTIO;; CARRIED.
TRACT no. q2nl - PRECISE PLANS: On Motion hv Councilman Seymour, seconded by
Councilman Roth, precise plans for Tract No. q2nl. including builòing elpva-
tions, floor plans and plot plan~ were approved as submitted by Fred W.
Kingdon, Pacesetter Homes, in accordance r.,ith the City Planning Commission
approval. provided the recoMmendatio~of the acoustical consultant shal1 he
ineorporated into the building plans in compliance with Couneil Policy No. ~4'.
'I()Tlm~ CARRIED.
FInAL :1AP TRACT NO. Q?f11: Developer, Pacesetter Homes; tract located on the
south side of Broadway, east side of Loara Street containin~ 88 proposed RS-
soon ~oned lots.
On Motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, the prono~ed
subdivision, together with its design and improvement, was found to be con-
sistent with the City's Genp-ral Plan and the City Council approved Final Map
Tract '10. Q201, as recommended hy the City EnRinep-r. MOTION CARRIED.
ADDRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL - MR. LOUIS DEXTER: The request of Hr. Louis Dexter
to addres~ the City Council re~arding the site location of a ne~., Citv Hall
facility was continued to the meeting of July (), 1117(" to he heard under the
unfinished business portion of the meetin~. on motion hy Councilman Thorn,
seconded by Councilman Roth. MOTIn~ CARRIED.
1T
J .
I I -
- ~.-=.~~.--c,_.-..- .... .""--__-q__TU
-------
7 r;-Id.. r;
City lIall, Anaheim, California - COTJ~¡CIL HrmTES - June 2(), 1°7fí, 1:3n P.~1.
PUBLIC FIRmmRKS DISPLAY PER?!IT: Permi t to allm.] a p1lnl ic fire~!Orks ni~plny con-
ducted by California Firework~ T)i~play Company, sponsor~d r,y Tommy Walker
Productions, on July 4, 1()7ó, corIMP-ncinr, at R:l) P.~1. at the Anaheim Starliuf1,
was approved :IS recommended hy thp. Fire Harshal, on mot ion hy Councilman Rott"
seconcled by CouncilMan Thom. HOrIOn CARRIED.
PURCHASE - SOCCER GOAL POSTS: Thp- request of :1r. ~villiam TIorp,er, An:lheim Soccpr
Club, that the City purchase three sets of goal posts to accommonate eqllinment
needs for the soccer program was suhmitted, together \<rfth inforMation from \..fr.
James ~uth that there are sufficient funds in the 1"75-7fí Parks, Recreation and
the Arts Department budget for ~aid purchase, ~12nn.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconcled nv Counc:f.lman Seymour, the City
Council approved the p\lrchase of 1 sets of goal posts as requested, with funns
from Parks, Recreation and the Art~ Department hudget ($l?'1n). HOTI()N CAR~Ir.n.
PURCHASI: OF EQUIP~ŒNT - 4Q-FOOT SPRAY BOOTH, BID NO. 1()q~: Thp. Assist:1nt City
~anager reported on informal hicls receiver! for the purcha!=;e of one I,O-foot
spray booth and recommencleò accp.ptance of the 1m" bi(l: ~]est Coast Spray Booth,
$1~,23ß.4R, including tax.
On motion by Councilman SeYMour, seconderl hy Councilman Thorn, the 10'" h:td
of Hest Coast Spray Booth wa~:; accP'Pted, and purchase authorizerl in the amount
of ~ 12, 23R .1+8, including tax.. nOTIOn CARP- lET).
RESOLUTIon :1os. 7óR-375 AND 7óR-37ó - AHART) OF conTRACTS, ~'JORK ORDER N(). fl12:
accordance with the recommendation of the City Engineer, CouncilMan Roth
offered Resolution Nos. 7óR-175 and 7~R-37~ for adoption.
In
Refer to nesolution Book.
RESOLUTIon :10. 7~R-375: A RESnLTTTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAIII:IH ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAl. A~m AHARDING A r.O~TRACT TO THE LOHEST
RESPŒISIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURTJISHPJG OF ALL PLANT, LAßOR, SERVICES, 'fATF.RIALS
AND E<1UIP1-fENT AND ALL UTILITIES Ann TRA"ISPORTATION, Inr.LUDI~IG POHER, FUEL ANn
WATER, AnD PERFORNPIG ALL ~'¡ORK NECESSARY TO CO1\ISTRTTCT AND COHPLETF. THE FOLT/Hl-
IHe PTJBLIC rœROVEMENT: TWILA REID ELECTl1ICAL PfPROVFJ1T:NTS, IN THE CITY OF
~~AHEp.I, ~'¡ORK ORDER NO. R12. (Arrow ßuilders - $1(),700)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-376: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY conNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEI~f ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL A~m AHARDINr, A CONTP~CT TO THE LOlmST
RESPo;'JS IBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHInG OF ALL PLANT, LAR()R, SERVICES, '1ATERIALS
AND LQUIP~ŒNT Arm ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATIOlJ, D1CLUDING POHER, FUEL A~m
HATER, AnD PERFORHIHC ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTPJTCT A~m C()HPLETE THE FOl.LOU-
IHe PUBLIC IHPROVE1-tr.NT: THIl.A REID HAINTENANCE ßUILDING INPROVEHENT, PI THE
CITY OF AnAIIEP1, WORK ORDER NO. R12. (Arrow Builders - ~1'5,7()f))
:;'011 Call Vote:
AYES:
ImES:
ABSEnT:
COUNCIL ~1EMBERS:
counCIL ~1EMBERS:
COUNCIL HEHBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth anrl Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 7~R-37'5 and 7~R-37~ duly pa~serl
and adopted.
ORDIN~~CE NO. 3554:
Councilman Seymour offered Orrlinance No. 3154 for ar1option.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAIIETI1 AME}IDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14. 4(), SECTIO~T
14.40. Of)O, SUBSECTION. 24f) OF THE ^,~AHEIH }1UNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SPEEn
LI~nTS. (Nohl Ranch Road, Serrano to the West City Limits, 35 ~1PII)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3554 duly passed and adopted.
If
¡..
=-- .""~
....
- _&&.' ,...;,_..
7fl1~.46h
City naIl, Anaheim, California - COTmCIL ~lINTJT'P.S - June 7°, lQ7ft, 1:1f) p.~.
ORDINA;¡CE 'JOS. 1515 A~m 351(.,:
and 35~h for adoption.
Counc i hvom:1n Kav,V'ooci of f f'red Orr1 inance Nos. 1 r:¡ r:¡ r:¡
~f>fer to Ordinance Book.
ORDn~NICE NO. 351)5: AN ORDINANCE OF TIm CITY nF ANAHEP1 Ann,1T)INe; TITtE 1~ OF
T11[' ANAHEIH :-.IDNICIPAL CODE REL^Tnl~ TO zm'TINr.. (ó7-r:;~-7(8), RS-Hs-¡n,()f)O(Sr.))
ORDINANCE NO. 355(;: An ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEPf A~fENnING TITLY. 1 P. OF
THE A1'IAHIE1-1 rnmICIPAL CODE RELATP,Jr. Tn 7I')jTINf'r. (73-7/1-55(1), Cl.)
:{oll Call Vote:
AYES:
HOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL ME:1BERS:
COUNCIL !'Œ~BERS:
COUNCIL ~1E~1BERS:
Kay"yooò, Seymour, Kot t, Roth and Thorn
Hone
None
The ~~yor declared Ordinance Nos. 35S5 and 355h duly passed
and adopted.
ORDINANCE ~~O. 3558:
reading.
Councilman Thorn offered Ordinance No. 151)8 for first
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIl'f A'fEDDWr TITLE 18 OF THE ANAlIEIH !-UmICIPAl.
CODE nELATING TO ZONIN~. (75-7(.,-1F., ~S-50nf))
PAPER ~ECYCLING: Councilwoman Kaywood requested that additional information he
provided regarding a possible waste paper recycling pro~ram in City offices.
UTILIZATION OF :~IKE BASE AS REGH)HAL PARK SITE: Councilwoman KaV\:,mod called
attention to a letter received from Supervisor Schmit requesting a resolution
of support from the Anaheim City Council for utili~ation of the Nike Base as a
regional park site, and thereupon moved that the City Attorney he directed to
prepare such a resolution of support. Councilman Thorn ~econded the motion.
To this motion Councilman Seymour voted "No", calling attention to the
fact that the City Council had received a telephone message from the ~avor of
Garden ~rove asking Council ~emhers to withhold action on this request for
support tmtil he had an opportunity to speak with them personally. MOTION
CARRIED.
DECLARATION OF VACANCY - CO7'fHUNITY REDEVELOPHENT C()\1r'HSSION: Councilman Kott
moved that the seat of Xr. Herb Leo on the Community Redeve]opmpnt Commission
he declared vacant. Councilman Thorn seconded the motion.
Prior to voting on the aforementioned motion, Councilman Roth expressed
his extreme concern over such a move to relieve a man from the Commission who
has no conflict ""hatsoever with Proj ect Alpha and ""ho has served his cornmunitv
so well. He stated that he considers the Council's action in this manner to he
very serious and dangerous.
The Mayor called for the vote on the foregoing motion.
vot eel "no". ~fOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Roth
APPOINrŒNT - COMt>fUNITY REDEVELOPHEHT CO~~fISSION: Councilman Kott moved that
'frs. :Iary Dinndorf, 131 La Paz Street, Anaheim, he appointed to fill Mr. Leo's
unexpired term on the Community Redevelopment Commission, said term ending June
3O, lQ7Q. Councilman Thorn seeonded the motion. To this motion, Councilman
Roth voted "~o". HOTION CARRIED.
RESIGNATION - COmIDNITY REDEVELOPMENT COHMISSION: Councilman Thom moved that the
letter of resignation from service on the Community Redevelopment Commission,
effective June 30, lQ7ó, received from Kenneth N. Cotler be accepted with
regret. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. }IDTION CARRIED.
1T
~
,CC,--',"-' ----="..........'-
~. .'..., + ,....
-,,~-,
7~-IJ67
C it y Hall, Anaheim» Cal iforn ia - r.mHiCIL MINUTES - June? q, 1 ()7 ~, 1: 1n P. '1.
i\ppnnnMENT - COMMUNITY REDEVELOP'ŒNT r.O\p:fIS~rrV;: CouncilMan Seymour moved that
~1r. Ben Bay, 211.8 H. Grayson Avenue, Anaheim, <)7901, he appointed to the
Community Redevelopment CommiRsion to fill the unexpired term of ~fr. J(enneth
Cotler, said term ending June In, 1°79. Councih'TOman Kav~.¡ooci ~econòecl the
motion. ~mTION CAQQIED.
APPOINTHENT - PARKS AND RECREATIOn CŒNISSION: It was reported that tJ,e term of
Mr. Bud ~1ahoney on the Parks anti Recreation ComMission expires June 3", lQ7~,
and that he does not wish to be reappointect. Councilwoman Kavwood thereupon
moved that ~rs. Mary Ruth Pin~on, 50~O Crescent Drive, Anaheim, o2~n7, he
appointed to the Parks and Recreation Commission for the term ending June In,
1980. Councilman Thorn seconded the motion. MOTION CAR~IED.
~EAPPOPTTI1ENT - PLANNING COHHISSIO~: On mot ion by Counc ilMan Sevmour, seconded
by Councilman ThoM, Hr. Floyd Farano "JaS reappointed to the AnaheiM City
Planning Commission for the ensuing term ending June 1'), lQ~"". rf()TIO"'T CARRIED.
TlEAPPOIlTTIfENT - CO~mNITY REnEVELOPHE~,IT C()~r.HSSION: On motion by CouncilMan
Seymour, seconded by CouncilwoMan Ka~'70od, '1r. ~fanuel Hende7. was reappoint~rÌ to
the Community Redevelopment Commission for the ensuing term ending June 3°,
lQ~f). ~1OTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-377 A~n 7f1R-378 - AHENDING RATES, RULES ANn RE~ULATI()!'T~ FO~
THE SALE A~m DISTRIBUTIŒT OF ELECTRIC mTERr.y ANn HATER: On recommenrlation of
the Utilities Director in his memorandum dated June 7.R, IQ7~ (on file in the
Dffiee of the City Clerk), Councilman Seymour offered Resolution Nos. 7~R-177
and 7n~-378 for adoption.
~efer to Resolution Book.
TZESOLUTION NO. 7()R-377: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIH A~NDING RATES, RULES AND REGULATIOT\TS FOR THE SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF
ELECTRIC ENERGY AS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION 110. 71 R-4 7 R AND A~ENDP.J) BY RESOLUTIONS
NOS. 73R-?5, 73R-343, 73R-531, 7hR-75, 74R-n30, 75R-243, 75R-344, 75R-345 ANn
76R-41. (Effective July 1, IQ7h)
REsnLUTION no. 76R-378: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIH AHENDING RATES, RULLS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF
WATER AS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO.7 2R-f;nn AND AMF.~1l)ET) BY RES()LUTI()~TS NOS. 73R-
255, 73R-387, 73R-532, 74R-4Jl, 75R-3I5, 75R-4nQ AND 75R-47Q. (Effective Julv
1, lQ7())
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
COUNCIL ME~1BERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
"JOES:
ABSENT:
The !~yor declared Resolution Nos. 7~R-377 and 7~R-37R duly passed
and adopted.
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Thorn moved to recess to Executive
Session. Councilman Seymour 8econded the motion. ~OTION CARRIED. (5: l~"" P .H.)
AFTER RECESS: Hayor Thorn called the meeting to order, all Council Memhers being
pre s en t . ( h : 0 Q P. H. )
RECESS:
By general consent, thE~ City Council recessed to 7:3n P.M.
«():lo P.tt.)
ALaNA ~,t. HOUGARD, CITY CLERK
By:
,/
~ ~ h . Xa-é-u-f:.~
\
Deputy
IT
"'~
--C-->I~;,.,"CC=;¡¡;"'.;~--c. ~;O=~~-Y
...
,~ .w. ~..,~~"
"'--
ì('-/4f,"
City lIull, Anaheim, California - CO1r'ICIL ~fInUTES - June 2Q, lQ7fi, 7:1('\ P.~L
PRESENT:
ABSEnT:
COU~ICIL 'ŒHBERS: Kaytvood, Seymour, TCot t, Roth nnd Thom
COU~TCIL ~fF}!RERS: ?Jone
ASSISTANT CITY HAJJAGE~: t-Jillian O. Talley
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Frank A. l..mvry, Jr.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
DEVELOPNENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Ronalò ThoMpson
TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Paul Sinp,er
ZONInG SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti
PREsnn:
AFTER RECESS: ;layor ThOI:l callen the meet in?, to order, all Council ~femhp-rs
being present. (7: 3() P. H.)
cmTTINHED PUBLIC HEARPIG - CœmITIf)NAL USE PF.R~~IT no. IhI';, VA~IA~TCE NO. ?Rf)?:
^pplication of Imperial Properties to permit a rlrive-through restaurant an~ to
construct t'(-10 comMercial buildinf,s in a planned unit shopping center ~vith the
following Code waivers on CL(SC) zone~ property locnterl on the north side of
Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Imperial Highway, was su~mitted toget~er with
application for negative declaration gtatus from the requirement to prepare an
ErR:
a.
Hinimum number of parl:ing spaces.
!1inimum structural s(~tback adj acent to an expresm..;ray.
~animum structural setbac}: adj acent to an expreSS"i'.1ay.
h.
c.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-8n
recommended that subject project be declared exempt from the requirement to
prepare an ErR, and further granted Conditional Use Permit No. l~l~, subject to
th~ followin~ conditions:
1. That the property owner(s) shall proportionately, on the basis of
acreage, participate in the costs of furnishing and installing a traffic si~nal
at the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Via Cortez, said participation
to he 35~< of the total cost (SIJo,onn) and amountin?, to SI4,nnn, and said amount
shall he paid prior to thA issuance of building permits.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
t.lith plans and specifications on file ",ith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
'10s. 1, 2, 3 and 4.
The City Planning CoTTlnission, pursuant to Resolution Ho. PC7(;-Rl, granted
Variance ~o. 2802 subject to the following conditions:
1. That the property owner(s) shall proportionately, on the basis of
acreage, participate in the costs of furnishing and installing a traffic si~nal
at the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Via Cortez, said participation
to be 15°~ of the total cost (~/~n,ono) and amounting to $ll+,nf)f), and said amount
shall he paid prior to the issuance of building remits.
~. That stiliject property shall he developed suhstantia11y in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhiñit
:T 0 S . 1, 2, 1, 4, 5 , ~, an n 7.
Review of action takC'1î by the City Planning Commission ,-ras requested by
'fayor W. J. Bill Thom at the City Council Heeting of Hay lR, 1()7", and public
hearing scheduled June 15, 1()7~. Said public hearing was further continued to
this date to allow time for an informational meeting between homeo\mers and th~
developer.
The ~ayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the
Council.
:"lr. Harry Rinker, representing Imperial Properties, 201 Via Quito, Ne'(.,rport
Beach, Q2660, gaye a brief presentation on the shopping center project using
photop,raphs of a similar development by his firm in Sacramento. He stressed
that because of the concerns of property owners in the Canyon area, a high
degree of attention has been pnid to the landscaping treatment in this develop-
ment proposal, to the extent that whereas the City requirement for landscapi.nr,
(2~ of the shopping area) would amount to 7,n~O square feet of landscaping,
they propose to put in 63,000 square feet of landscaping and, in addition,
there would be 30,000 square fE~et of landscaping on City right-of-way which
they have committed to install and maintain durin~ the life of the center.
1T
,r..
.,."" -..=C....""~.., "" ,,"~~"",,'-'--.-q
.-'"--
7fi-ld;'Q
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COU:1CIL ~HtTUTE~ - June ?"I, 1°7f, 7: 1') P.H.
This amounts to Q3,nnn sqtlare feet of lanrlscapinr, or 2~.h~ of thp total
pro; ect.
~rr. Rinker displayprl several different plot plans anrl expl~ined t~at t~e
need for the requested variance stems primarily from the parking and placement
of structures to the front of the project. lIe noted that it is proposerl to
locate a hank, a savings and loan institution and a ñrive-throu~h restaurant to
the front of the property, and for the optimum traffic circulation and parJ~in~
utilization of the center th:ls area should have parkin~ which would not compete
with the parkinR area for the food market. By adhering strictly to the sethack
requirements they would lose two rows of parking, ~.¡hich they feel to he criti-
cal for the USe of the savings and loan institution. ~fr. Rinker used overlavs
to Jescribe the findings and alternatives pro~uced by fifteen approaches to
this particular problem. The conclusion was that the project would have More
landscaping area with the proposed setback variance. In connection witl) the
fast-food restaurant proposed (Del Taco), a specially designed huilrling was
created which would conform to the overall appearance and maintain the
integrity of the shopping center. Renderings of this speciaJ. building were
displayed as well as the proposed savings and loan and hank huildinRs.
In response to Councilmnn Seymour, Hr. Rinker advised that if his firm
owned the property currently located in the Santa Ana Valley Irri~ation ease-
nent lying immediately in front of his property, then the setbacl~s would he R
feet, 2 feet and 0 feet from being within the required In~-foot setback, rather
than 3n feet, 36 feet and 7n feet, respectively, as proposed.
In response to objections expressed previously by property o~roers to t~e
all-night operation of a restaurant on the sotlthwest corner of the project, Mr.
Rinker explained that they hav~ ñiscontinued negotiations on that lease, and
read a letter dated June 2Q, l°lF, indicatinr, they "would he apreearle to the
placement of a restrictive COVenant in anv neu restaurant or tenant lease
prohibiting the operation of same between the hours of 2:nn A.M. to 6:00 A.'~.
Pc advised that the southwest corner of the proiect is currently vacant, and
his best estimate as to t~e proj ected plans for that corner ~,:rould he sone sort
of restaurant.
Hith respect, however, to the Albertson's food market, Hr. Rinker
explained that the developers and owners of the shopping center have no control
over their hours of operation, inasmuch as the lease has already been executed.
He added that he would assume that the market operation would be sensitive to
the Majority demands of the surrounding community.
The Mayor called for those who wished to address the Council, either in
favor or in opposition.
"Irs. nary Dinndorf, 131 La Paz Street, Anaheim, President of the Santa Ana
Canyon Improvement Association, Inc., summarized the circular distributed to
Canyon homeo~~ers by the Dunn Company, the leasing agent for subject shopping
center. She further noted that there are restrictions in hillside zoning
sections ~.,hich limit business activities to the hours between (i:3n A.H. and
12:00 P.~I. She contended that the problem the Canyon area faces is that there
is still a lot of land available for commercial development and the granting of
this variance would set an undesirable precedent in the face of that potential
development.
Further comments in opposition to the granting of any variances or excep-
tions to the Zoning Code were expressed by Mitzy Ozaki, 34n South Timken Road,
Anaheim, representing the Santa Ana Canyon Property Owners Association, and
Ste~Nart ~foss, 491 Via Vista, Anaheim, member of the Santa Ana Canyon General
Planning Task Force.
Hr. Cliff Barrett, .1374 l~illowick Drive, Anaheim, stated that he obj ected
to the proposed variance and (~onditional use permit based on the increaseft
traffic in the area which would eventually lead to the necessity for the
widening of Santa Ana Canyon Road, and this would then eliminate most of the
landscaping in front of the shopping center. In addition, he objects to the
location of a fast-food restaurant in the vicinity of a high school and ele-
mentary school as, in his expE~rience, this predisposes to drug problems.
1r
,..
1-
. H";;,,-=>.zec c-,,-=;¡¡ co.-- --=,~~. I='.__..~~. ... .
-~,--- -~".. ..
7 A-!+ 7 n
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COTJNCIL HINUTES - Jun~ 2c), 1()7~1 7!'3n P.~'L
~r. Gene TIetzel, ~2F~ Rio Grande, Anaheim, voicerl hig opposition to the
entire shopping center and su~gestect that one alternative to resolving the
prohlem faced hy the development rvoul(1 he to delete those three front
structures from the plans.
Sherry 'vay, 13~ Jerrile Lane, Anaheim, Secretary of the Santa Ana Canyon
Improvement Association, Inc., advised that the Albertson's food chain ~.vas
notified of the homeowners' objections to ?4-hour service and have neVer for-
warded any reply, nor has thig firm attended the public hearings regarding this
shopping center. She voiced the opinion that the Council '(.]ould still he ahle
to insist on some regulation on their operating hours.
Jan Hall, 545 Tumbleweed Road, Anaheim, President of the Hestrid~e
Homeowners' Association, indicated tnat mogt of the landscaping referrPJ1 to by
~1r. ~inker is located to the renr of the propertv and should not he considere~
a trade-off for the varinnce. She related that the residents wish the
integrity of the Canyon and Scenic Corrirlor Overlav zoning to he upheld.
~1rs. Hazel Naag, 17) North Solomon Drive, Anaheim, or.mer of pronertv
adjaèent and to the east of the shoppinE; center quegtioned the access roan
situation and the traffic signal assessment against her property.
'fr. ~farty Ondquist, C) 57 South Denton, Anal-}eim, homeowner in t1,e Annheim
11ills Area, stated that ohjectively it appears to him it would be a better
situation to permit the developer to proceed with the plan he propo~es, rather
than to make him conform to the required setbacks.
~lr. Dick Bloom, 658!~ E. Calle Del Norte, Anaheim, voiced the concern that
it is too late to stop this project now, inasmuch as it i~ half built. He
remarked that the developer has done a goon job in ma1~ing it look as 1;¥'ell as he
cant and that he would be in favor of granting the variance.
;lr. Dean Hesketh, 130 Timken Road, An.:1heiM, voiced the opinion that tllis
project is over-developed and that the Council should adhere to the ordinance
as Hri.tten.
:!r. Ben Bay, 2148 W. Grayson Avenuet AnaheiM, voiced concern añout this
proj ect as it ~vould establish a precedent, and recalled that it was hy granting
variances and waivers from Code requirements thnt strip commercial areas '{vere
proliferated in the City of Anaheim. He further stated that he helievec1 the
people desire that the ordinances be carried out as they are '{~itten and want
good general planning.
'lr. Bill Short, 482~ Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, spoke in favor of tne
~ranting of the variance and conditional use pe~it as requested.
Betty and Bob Segerstrom, 121 S. Quintana Drive, Anaheim, aJdressed the
Council regarding the differences in the plans presented and noted that they
are, and have been, business ten~nts in shoppin?, centers and have heen suhject
to limitations on t~eir hours of business.
~1r. Thomas Hebb, .535 S. Ranchviev.1 Circle, Anaheim, pre~ented a petition
containing names and addresses of eight buginess tenants in this shoppinB
center who are also homeowners in Anaheim Hills. He advised that he and those
listed on the petition are in favor of the requested variance inasmuch as they
believe the denial of it would act as a hardship on all of the tenants in the
center.
Pam Berry, 6()12 La Paz Circle, Anaheim, raised for discussion the point
that if Albertson's food market operates 24 hours per day, then the area will
require additional police protection.
Following the public comments section of the hearing, Mr. Rinker intro-
duced the architect for the project, Mr. Robert Haugaard, who gave his
professional opinion as a land planner on the benefits of the plan they pro-
pose.
There being no further persons who wtshed to speak, ~fayor Thorn closerl the
public hearing.
1T
, ~ L "".~"'-'.."_~h, ,
. -,.,~.."
7~-471
City Hall, Anaheim, Californi:"l - C()lr;T~IL HIHUTES - June 2Q, 1l17", 7:3(') P.~1.
Upon beinr, informed tl1<lt proj ected traffic volumes on Santa Ana r,anyon
Road would probably require that one additional west-hound Inne he a~~e~ in th~
future, and c1etermining th:1t it \vould he appropriate to require that the
developer of this shoppinR center continue at that time to provide an accel(>ra-
tion lane as a safety feature in conjunction with his access to Santa Ana
ranvon r~oarl, as is currently planned, and that the propp.rty incltH~ed ::In. the
Santa Ana Valley Irrigation easement nay he included in the City right-of-Hav,
Councilman Seymour stated th:1t he felt the intent of the Code re~ui.r~ment for
the ln~-foot setback would he met if the Imperial Properties development were
given the benefit of that easement toward the front sethacl-- re~uirement.
During Council
hours of operation,
the Canyon area and
the hirh school.
In response to her coMments, Hr. Rinker offered
Albertsons' executives and community representatives
tian.
ctiscussion, Councibvoman Kavwood voiced her concern r.!ith
especially over the possibility of a 24-hour operation in
also felt :1 drive-thru restaurant ~ms inappropriDte across fron
to host a meeting hetween
to discuss hours of opera-
f]J~/IRonHEnTAL IHPACT - NEGATIVE DECLARATIO~T: On motion 11y Councilman Seymour,
seconded by Councilman Kott, the City Council finds that this project will hnve
no significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report. ~10TION CARRIED.
RESOLUTIO:¡ :~OS. 7f1R-37q AND 7óR-3gf): Councilman Seymour offered Resolution 'Tos.
7~R-37Q and 76R-38n granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1616 and Variance No.
2802, respectively, suhject to the conditions recommended hy the City Planntnp;
Commission and, further, suhJect to an additional condition which reads as
f o11mvs :
"That all structures he located with a minimuM Inn-foot front setbac'" froM
any edge of pavement, current or planned in the future".
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-J79: A RESOLUTIOtT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAIIEPf GRANTING CŒ'mITIONAL USE l'ER1>nT NO. 1 ~ 1 h.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-38n: A RESOLUTlmr OF THE CITY COU~TCIL OF THE CITY OF
A~1AIIEIH GRANTING VARIAN~E no., 2302.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL HE~'1BERS:
COUNCIL HE'fBERS:
COUNCIL HEHBERS:
Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
Kaytvood
~1one
NOES:
ABSENT:
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 7~R-37q and 76R-38n duly passed
and adopted.
ADJOURNHENT: Councilman Seymour moved to adjourn.
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Roth second~d the
Adjourned:
10:07 P.H.
ALaNA M. HOUGARD, CITY CLERK
By:
}
-~~~h~ ~~---
Deputy
1r
Cc~" -