1976/08/10
76-556
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
CITY ENGINEER: James P. MAddox
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Frank A. Lowry, Jr.
MANPOWER COORDINATOR: William Hepburn
HOUSING DIRECTOR: Rosario Mattessich
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti
'..,.
--
Mayor Thorn called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance
to the Council meeting.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilwoman Miriam Kaywood led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meeting held June 22, 1976,
were approved as corrected. on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by
Councilman Roth. MOTION CARRIED.
...
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent
to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council ~lembers unless, after
reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council ~{ember for the
reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Roth seconded ,the motion.
1-10TION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the
amount of $3,932,607.49, in accordance with the 1976-77 Budget, were approved.
NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION AREA DESIGNATION: A report from Rosario Mattessich and
- a film on the types of local applications and achievements under the
neighborhood preservation program were presented for Council. Mr. Mattessich
advised that if the City is interested in designation of a neighborhood
preservation area, the application to the California Housing Financing Agency
must be submitted by August 15, 1976. He reviewed that once the City has
established such an area, it will permit low and moderate income families to
secure subsidized loans for rehabilitation and improvement of their property.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-465:
for adoption.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered R~8o1ution No. 76R-465
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN
APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA HOUSING AND FINANCING AGENCY FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD
PRESERVATION AREA.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNC It MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-465 duly passed and adopted.
COMMUNITY SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD: Report and recommendation prepared by the
Community Development Department regarding the establishment of a Community
Services Advisory Board was submitted for Council consideration. The report
recommended that such a Board be established to integrate and coordinate the
normal community services functions with Housing, Redevelopment and Manpower
Programs. This board would, essentially, be composed of citizens from a
variety of walks of life who would work with five ex-officio members repre-
senting the City Manager's Office and the Departments of Community.Development,
Police, Personnel and Parks, Recreation and the Arts.
'"
.
. ,,¡¡
---"""",""'=--~-.=.~n,'_~""._,,- ,.,
_...~...
76-557
i=ity_Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August If), 1976, 1~3f) P.H.
~r. Mattessich pointed out that thi~ advisory board would investiRste to
determine what resources are available to the City. Certain Federal programs
alse require that tllere be a citizen participation process, and this board
would serve as a good advisory body for holding public hearings to determine
community priorities, etc.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by CounGilwoman Kaywood, the
City Council approved the establishment of a Community Services Advisory Board,
as recommended by the Community Development Department, and further directed
the City Attorney to prepare the ordinance creating such a board. MOTION
CARRIED.
"--
TAT! STREET COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAN: The consul tanto' s report on the Patt
Street improvement program was ~ubmitted for Council consideration, together
with a request from the consultant, Urban Projects, Inc., and the Patt Street
community that the Council meet with them to discuss their goals and the recom-
mendations contained in the report.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City
Council accepted the report: prepared by Urban Projects, Inc. and further indi-
cated their interest to adjourn to 7:30 P.M. from the regular meeting Tuesday,
August 17, 1976, to meet wlth the consultant and the members of the Patt Street
Community. MOTION CARRIED.
1ŒSOLUTION NO. 76R-466 - EXPANSION OF CETA HOUSING REPAIR PROGRAH: On report
dated August 2, 1976, from Mr. Hilliam Hepburn recommending that the current
housing repair program be expanded, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No.
76R-466 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF ACETA SUBCRANT AGREEMENT BETI-TEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND TIlE
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADVISORY OFFICE, EMPl.OTIillNT DEVELOPHENT
DEPARTMENTt RELATING TO A HOUSING REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE TRAINING PROJECT AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT AND MODIFICATIONS
THERETO ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND TO AUTHORIZE THE DISBURSEMENT OF
FUNDS PERTAINING THERETO.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL HEMBERS~
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
ABSENT:
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-466 duly passed and adopted.
,tillLTIHODAL GROUP, INC. - gO-DAY EXTENSION: Hr. Jack Sinclair reported that
Multimodal Group, Inc. is making progress toward attracting the type of
financial support necessary for their transportation program. He further noted
that Multimodal GrouPt Inc. feels the current request for a 90-day extensiön of
time to the condition precedent to execution of the lease agree~ent is
reasonable.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-46R:
adoption.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 468 for
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A FURTHER,
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR HUL TIMODAL GROUP, INC., TO COMPLY WITH TIlE CO}ID ITION
PRECEDEnT IN RESOLUTION NO. 76R-159 AS EXTENDED BY RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-239 AND
76R-382.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC II. MfJfBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-4~8 duly passed and adopted.
'"
~- T-~ c
,~ '~'"4'_"""'"
~-~,.,..,
~
76-55b
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1976, 1:3() P.N.
GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT EXTENSInN - TAYLOR-DUNN: On motion by
Councilman Kott, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council approved a 36-
month extension to the existing contract with Taylor-Dunn for the maintenance
by that firm of golf carts at the Anaheim Hills Golf Course. all other terms
and conditions remaining the same, authorized the Stadium-Convention Center-
Golf Director to execute said agreement. MOTION CARRIEp.
APPOINTMEnT - ACTING CITY MANAGER: On motion by Councilman Seymour. seconded by
Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council appointed Mr. John Harding as Acting
Ci.ty Manager for the 24-hour period of August 15. 1976. in the absence of ~fr.
William O. Talley. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-469 - CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODES: Mr. Frank Lowry presented
for Council consideration the resolution calling for conflict of interest codes
to be submitted by City departments and boards and commissions and establishing
August 31. 1976 as the public hearing date on said conflict of interest code.
Following brief discussion during which it was determined by the Council that
all City departments, as well as all City boards and commissions established by
Charter or ordinance. would be required to submit conflict of interest codes,
Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 76R-469 for adoption.
..
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DESIGNATING
COMMISSIONS. DEPARTtlliNTS OR AGIDICIES ,mICH ARE REQUIRED TO ADOPT A CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE AND ESTABLISHING THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 1976. AS THE DATE, TIME
AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood. Seymour, Kott. Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolutiort No. 76R-469 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-470 - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT, TRACT NO. 8015:
(Oaktree-Scottsdale Venture) Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-470
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A~tAHEIM APPROVING TIlE TERMS AND
AUTHORI7.ING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT BET\mEN OAKTREE-SCOTTSDALE VENTURE AND THE CITY OF ANMIEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEHT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 16R-470 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTIOtI NO. 76R-471 - PLACING ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER IN CLASSIFIED SERVICE
CATEGORY: Councilman Thorn offered Resolution No. 76R-471 for adoption repeal-
ing the previously adopted resolution placing the Assistant City Manager
position in the "exempt" classification and placing said position in the
"classified service" category.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING RESOLUTION
NO. 75R-638 PERTAINING TO THE Ct~SSIFICATION OF ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER.
....."
..
..".."_.d,,~... 0.."""""""".""'"
""""U..v...,.." . . ._-
76-559
~~_l!allJ Anaheim) California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
.AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT;
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
COUNCIL t-Œt1BERS:
Kaywood. Seymour. Kott. Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-471 duly pa~sed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-472 - AGREEMENT \-TITH CARL HARREN AND COMPANY - CLAIHS
ADJUSTERS: Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 76R-472 for adoption
approving an agreement to employ Carl ~]arren and Company to act as adjusters
for the City's self-funded general liability insurance program.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS A~rn
CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEHENT WITH CARL HARREN &. CO. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
-
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEnT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood. Seymour. Kott. Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-472 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTIon NO. 76R-473 - GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS: Councilman Thom offered
Resolution No. 76R-473 for adoption establishing a procedure for handling of
general liability claims, pursuant to California Government Code Section 935.4.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING TUE CITY
ATTOR.~EY TO ALLOW. COHPROHISE OR SETTLE CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IF
THE AMOUNT TO BE PAID IS $1,000.00 OR LESS AND AUTHORIZING TlIE CITY ATTORNEY TO
51 GN ON BEHALF OF THE CITY ANY ALLOWANCE. COMPROMISE OR SETTLEMENT AGREÐŒNTS
OR DOCIDŒNTS RELATING THERETO.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEnT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-473 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - P~CLASSIFICATION NO. 76-77-1: Application of Sylvester B.
Kramer requesting a change in zone from RS-A-43.000 to RS-7200 in order to
establish two RS-7200 lots on property located at 1613 East Santa Ana Street
was submitted, together with application for exemption status from the require-
ment to prepare an environmental impact report.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-127, recom-
mended subject project be declared exempt from the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report and further recommended approval of
Reclassification No. 76-77-1, subject to the following conditions:
1. That sidewalks shall be installed as required by the City Engineer and
in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of
the City Engineer.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60 cents per front foot along Elder Street and Santa Ana Street for
tree planting purposes.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Elder Street and Santa Ana Street for
street lighting purposes.
4. In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose of
sale. lease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved division of
".
"<> >~>.""'>---""'~">"'"
>--
7 6 - ') 'J')
City Ball, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
'3ubje t IHI)t"erty shn~: be '3ubm:ltteù to and approved by the City of Anaheim and
th'~n ~"e re(ord~d in thC' (Jffice of the f'range County Recorder.
~. T~at the O~ler 6f subject property shall pay to the City
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to
appropriate by the City Council. said fees to be paid at the time
pe'rmit Is issued.
f;. Tr:at in the event subject property is subdivided, the existing
structure(s) shall comply with all site development standards of the RS"":7200
(Residential, SingJ_e-.Family) Zone.
Î. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with pl::ms and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
No.1
of Anaheim
be
the building
...
'J Prior to thp introduction of an ordinance rezoninp; subject property,
Condition !~os. 2 and 3. above-mentioned. shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the
Cj.ty Council. unless said ccmditions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
'1, That Condition Nos. 1 and 7, above-mentioned. shall be complied with
prior ~O final building and zoning inspections.
The Hayor asked if the: applicant or his agent were present and satisfied
with the recommendation of the City Planning Commission.
..
'{r¡:; < Kraemer ~ appearing on behalf of her husband, stated they were in
agree:11ent ",,1 th the City Planning Commission recommendations.
Miss Santalahti brouBht to Council's attention a request from Mr. Gilbért
KllltheJ the gentleman who proposes to move a dwelling structure onto one of the
lots on subject property, for "miver of the park in-lieu fees 3S required in
Condition No.5 of City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC76-127, in
connectIon with the move-Of\ structure.
~r. K1Dthe stated that the rationale behind his request is that this
structure 'Will not increase the demand for parks.
Mr. Watts suggested that since the applicant intends a lot split, that
rather than delete Condition No.5 entirely. it be amended to provide that park
in-1 l(>u fees not be required for the move-on structure, but would be appl icable
to any new constructfonÞ
'The ~1ayor asked 1. f anyone wished to address the Counc 11. either in favor
or in opposition; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed.
E}f'V'IRONHEHTAL IMPACT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman Seymour,
seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood. the City Council finds that this project will
have r~o sIgnificant effect on the environment and is exempt from the
requirement to prepare 'an environmental impact report.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-474: Counc:Llman Seymour offered Resolùtion No. 76R-474 for
adoption authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the
zone 35 requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commisslon~ with amendment to Condition No.5 thereof to read as follows:
"5. That the O\offier of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim e1e appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees, as
determined to be appropriate by the City Council, in connection with
~ny new construction on the property; said fees to be paid at the
time the building permit is issued."
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLLJTIŒ~ OF 'fUr. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FUmING AND DETERMINING
THAT TITLE 18 OF TIlL ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (76-77-1,
RS-7200)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood. Seymour. Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-474 duly passed and adopted.
"IT
.
"'-""."'-,~ ~"'--"-'-" .
-,"-~."~"".,,, "
._.-
76-561
~;it)i-B.~11,_~~~~eim1,. Californ~- COUNCIL ~!INUTES - August 10. 1976, 1:30 P.M.
YUßLIC HEARING - HOUSEMOVnJC APPLICATION: Application of Gilbert Kluthe for a
special permit to move a dwelling structure from 831 South State Col1eRe
Boulevard to 1621 East Santa Ana Street (property within Reclassification No.
76-77-1) was submitted for Council consideration together with report from the
Planning Department.
The Hayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, either in favor
or in opposition to the proposed housernoving; there being no response. he
declared the hearing closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-475: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 76R-475 for
adoption approving a special permit to move a dwelling structure from 831 South
State College to 1621 East Santa Ana Street.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSEMOVING
PERMIT TO GILBERT KLUTIIE. (1621 East Santa Ana Street)
Roll Call Vote:
.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL HEHBERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-475 duly passed and adopted.
QRADING PERMITS - TRACT NOS. 9268 AND 8783: Requests were submitted by Anaheim
Hills. Inc. and Warmington Development Company in connection with Tract Nos.
9268 and 8783, respectively, for permission to grade said tracts prior to the
installation of an off-site storm drain. Tract No. 9268 is located south of
Nohl Ranch Road, west of Royal Oak Road; Tract No. 8783 is located east of
Royal Oak Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road.
Mr« Jack Gregory, 5128 E. Crescent Drive, Anaheim, was recognized by the
Mayor and stated that apparently these requests would have some effect on
Crescent Drive. He explained his concern that construction of the future storm
drain in that area would require removal of trees.
In response to Mr. Gregory, the City Engineer explained the status of the
proposed storm drain plans for the subject area and its probable location.
noting that no final plans for this drain have yet been submitted.
On motion by Councilman Kott. seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City
Council approved grading permits to allow grading in Tract Nos. 9268 and 8783
prior to installation of an off-site storm drain, subject to the condition that
provision for the temporary retention of the mud and/or debris within Tract
Nos. 9268 and 8783 be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
maintained by the respective developers during the grading operations of Tract
Nos. 9268 and 8783. and after the grading is completed until such time as the
downstream storm drain is constructed and operational, as recommended by the
City En~ineer and, further, subject to the submittal of final drainage plans
for the area to the Council with notification to Hr. Gregory as to the date
Council would consider same. MOTION CARRIED.
RI"CE" c: .
. ,) u .
By general consent. the Council recessed for five minutes.
(2:55P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Hayor Thorn called the meeting to order, all Council Members beinr,
present with the exception of Councilman Seymour. (3:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-476 - SALE OF CITy-oI.]NED PROPERTY: (Southeast corner of
Tustin and Jefferson) Upon receipt of report prepared by the City Engineer
regarding the sale of excess City-owned land (1,497.87 square feet) evaluated
at $525 by the Real Property Section, to Checkmate tfanagement Company in order
to incorporate same in development with their property adjacent and to the
east; the City to retain an easement for storm drain purposes. Councilman Roth
offered Resolution No. 76R-476 for adoption.
....'
.
",',,',' .'
7b-:>l'L
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1976,1:30 P.M.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TIIE TERMS AND
COrIDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT TO SELL CERTAIN CITy-oWNED PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING
~~ DIRECTING EXECUTION OF A DEED CONVEYING TITLE THERETO. (Checkmate)
Roll Call Vote:
.,
AYES:
NOES:
TEMPORARIL Y ABSEnT:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
Seymour
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-476 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-477 - FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEN:
Resolution No. 76R-477 for adoption.
Councilman Thorn offered
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TUE CITY OF
ANAHEIM PORTION OF THE 1980 FUNCTIONAL USAGE STUDY, THE URBAN BOUNDARIES OF
SAID CITY, AND THE DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL-AID URBAN ROUTES IN SAID CITY.
.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
TEMPORARILY ABSEnT:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
Seymour
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-477 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Seymour returned to the Council Chamber.
(3:05 P.M.)
CHAl¡GE ORDER NOS. 3 AND 4, WORK ORDER NOS. 1011 AND 1012: (Sunkist and Euclid
Branch Libraries) On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman
Seymour, the City Council approved Change Order No.3, Work Order No. 1011,
consisting of an increase of 5.86% or $16,919.36, and further approved Change
Order No.4, Work Order No. 1012, consisting of an increase of 2.9%, or
$10,014.14, bringing total contract amount's to $305,422.16 for Work Order No.
1011 and $352,914.88 for Work Order No. 1012. Councilman Kott voted "No".
MOTION CARRIED. .
RESOLUTIO1t NO. 76R-478 - COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - MEATS-LAKEVIE~'¡ CONNECTION: The
cooperative agreement proposed between the Cities of Anaheim, Orange, Villa
Park and the County of Orange with respect to the Meats-Lakeview connection
from Santiago Canyon Road to Nohl Ranch Road was submitted for Council
approval, together with the information that this project was requested to be
included in the AHFP program for this year.
Councilman Seymour voiced concern that approval of this cooperative
agreement by the City of Anaheim not be construed by other governmental
agencies as concurrence by the City Council of the City of Anaheim with the
extension of Lakeview Avenue. Following brief discussion, it was determined
appropriate to prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature setting forth
the City Council's opposition to the extension of Lakeview Avenue and forward
it to the cities or Orange and Villa Park and the County.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-478: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-478 for
adoption, and further directed that the above-referenced letter be mailed
together with said resolution.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TEIU-tS
AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH TIlE CONSTRUCTION OF A
LAKEVIEH AVENUE-MEATS AVENUE CONNECTION BETWEEN SANTIAGO CANYON ROAD ArID
NOHL RANCH ROAD, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
'..,'
.
76-563
~.lli !!~}), AnahplmL~,.;~allJ,,~-'rni~_COUNCIL HINUTES - August 10, 1976) 1 :30 P.N.
Roll Ca]' 'U.-.~"
AYES: COUNCIL HEHBERS: Kaywood,
NOES: COUNCIL ME~mERS: ~Jone
ABSEnT: COUNCIL MEHBERS: None
Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
'""
The Hayor declared Resolution No. 76R-478 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-I,79 - REJECTING BIDS - TRAFFIC SIGNAL HAINTENANCE CONTRACT:
. (Account No. 100-456-245) On report and recommendation from the City Engineer
that all bids received for the traffic signal maintenance contract be rejected
and this account be readvertised, with an interim agreement to cover the period
to September 15, 1976 being under negotiation with all those firms who
submitted bids, Councilman Thorn offered Resolution No. 76R-479 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS
RECEIVED UP TO THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1976, FOR TilE
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS, AND READVERTISING THE OPENING OF BIDS
THEREON, ACCOUNT NUHBER 100-456-245. (Bids to be Opened - 2: no P .H., September
2, 1976)
..
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNC IL HEl1BERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Hayor declared Resolution No. 76R-479 duly passed and adopted.
ANAHEIM BOULEVARD-llASTER STREET OVERCROSSING: On motion by Councilman Roth,
seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council authorized a letter be
forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors requesting that they unite with
the City of Anaheim in urging the California Department of Transportation to
amend their six-year program to include the Anaheim Boulevard-Haster Street
o,..ercrossing. MOTION CARRIED.
PUDLLC UTILITIES BOArS; - APPOINT11ENT: Councilman Roth appointed Hr. Ken I(eesee,
40f; North Dwyer Drive, AnahEdm, to the Public Utilities Board. On motion by
Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, all other appointments
an the designation of terms for appointees were continued to the meeting of
August 17, 1976. ~tOTION CARRIED.
CONTINUED DISCUSSION - CHARTEE REVIEH COHMITTEE RECONMENDATIONS: (Continued from
the meeting of August 3, 1976) Mayor Thorn recognized Mr. John Flocken 1320
South Hacienda Street, President of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, who read a
prepared statement which he indicated was unanimously authorized by their
Executive Committee. The opinion reflected in the statement ~as that a
decision by the Council this date on placement of the Charter Review Committee
recommendations on the ballot would be premature; that very careful delibera-
tions are requisite to changes of such magnitude and, further, that no clear
consensus was indicated on the proposed changes to Sections 604 and 701, the
vote of the Charter Review Committee being 8 to 7. Hr. Flocken further stated
thtit the changes proposed to make the hiring and firing of department heads the
responsibility of the City Council, rather than the City Manager, defies sound
principles of management and would render any effective management of the City
impo8S ib le.
Mr. Louis Dexter~ 305 North Ranchito Street, voiced his opinion that the
Charter Review Committee recommendations fell short of what he envisions
necessary to make the City Council and Mayor more responsive to the public need
and to make the administrative people more responsive to Council wishes. In
particular, Hr. Dexter felt that the recommendations fell short because they
did not expand the Council to seven members, nor did they provide for District
representation.
Hr. I. Gene McDaniel, 1818 Hest Harriet Lane, Anaheim, urged that the
Council take deep consideration of these proposed changes before moving into
any rapid action. He commented that the proposed changes would cause the City
..... '
7b-;)64
£!!..V Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1976, 1:30 P.H.
to be run in an unbusiness-like manner; that making responsible positions of
authority subject to a political body would drive good professionals away from
wéJnt1.ng positions in this City. He concluded that these recommendations
rE~quire a great deal of study as to their impact and that it would be a dis-
service to the taxpayers to proceed.
-",
--
Mr. Ray Campbell, 620 Gilbuck, Anaheim. member of the Charter Review
Committee, stated that he apparently was the "swing" vote on the issue of
requiring the Council. rather than the City Manager, to hire departMent heads.
He reported that what he personally desired to see come out of the recom-
mendation was a trulndatory "advise and consent" clause to the Charter, and
stated that if this were included in the Charter Review Committee's recom-
mpndation, he would then change his currently standing "yes" vote to a "no",
which would make the vote on this particular proposition 8 t~ 7 against.
- ... '"
~r. Jim Townsend. 808 North Pine Street. Anaheim. member of the Charter
Review Committee, stated that he was not in favor of sharing power between five
Council Members, but would choose to have the Hayor in complete charge in lieu
of the City Hanager. He cited the City's current population reaching 200,000
as additional reason for a change in the basic form of government. He urged
that this proposition be placed on the ballot for the electorate to decide.
~frs. Loretta Bowen, also a member of the Charter Review Committee,
contended that the propositions constitute a complete reorganization of the
C:ity government which the Committee did not even have time to discuss; that
many of these items were introduced during the last half-hour of the last
meeting, whereas she had originally understood the Council would review the
recommendations at a meeting with the Committee. She urged that the Council
schedule another meeting and allow the alternates. as well as the delegates. to
vote on these issues to obta1.n a fair picture of the Committee opinion.
Mr. Grant Hubbard. 1913 West Elm Place, Anaheim, stated that if the
Committee recommendation is to change the basic form of government structure,
then this should be clearly put to the people, that the City is moving away
from the Council-Manager form of government, and that there is a comprehensive
form of government being offered in its place. He stated that he personally
did not approve of a change. but that if one is to be made it should not be
made on a piece meal basis; that the proposal as set forth by the Charter
Review Committee is deficient. He concluded that the people elect their own
representatives with the confidence that they would not place on a ballot
anything Which the Council Members did not endorse or did not believe was a
sound proposal.
Councilwoman Kaywood strongly agreed with t1rs. Bowen that there has not
been sufficient time for discussion and input on these proposals, and pointed
out some areas contained in the recommendations which would cause difficulties
should they be passed by the electorate. She commented that this is indicative,
that there was not sufficient time for discussion to make such comprehensive.
far-reaching changes in the basic structure of government for the City.
Councilman Roth also felt that the Council has a responsibility to the
people to propose to them only those amendments which are responsible. He
stated that there is a need for additional public input via a public hearing,
and that due to the seriousness of the changes proposed he definitely felt that
there should be more direction received by the Council on What it is the people
want. He noted that even the (:omments given here by those members on the
Committee indicate the lack of consensus and need for additional discussion.
Councilman Seymour stated that his review of the Charter Review Committee
recommendations, as well as the public discussions, lead him to believe that
the real question which needs to be placed before the public is, specifically,
whether or not the electorate desires a strong }myor-Council form of government
as opposed to the existing Council-Manager form. He voiced his own personal
opin ioti as being against this <:hange; however, he stated that he would be
willing to place this question before the electorate.
MOTION: Councilman Seymour thereupon moved that the City Attorney be
instructed to draft three alternatives 8S to how the basic question of
".
..
..-14"-""",,+--
~- .." --C""-.._- ~""- - ," "..-..
r~~...m
--,-
76-.565
flt}~ :all, f¡flahLtm.ì.i,alt~ornia - COUNCIL ~nNUTES - August 10, 1976, 1:30 P.H.
¡ (iL1nLl1-~1.1na¡J'T \'~: Ccu.\(:!J-,
\ (11: ferrn (If governMent mir;ht nppcar on the hal10t.
uncilman Kott seconded the motion.
Prior to votin~ on the motion, in response to questions from Mr. Watts, it
wns clarified thtH the tntrnt~'as to place only one of the three proposed
wordings on the bqllot. tofether with precise amendmen~s to specific sections
of the Charter to accomplish the change to the Mayor-Council form of govern-
mr>nt.
Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that the Council is proposing a major
change in City government with less than one week's time to draft the wording
for the ballot. She stressed that she could not support any ballot proposition
unless the wording were drafted so as to be absolutely clear to all of the
voters, and that she did not think this could be accomplished in the short time
available.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, Councilman Seymour recalled that when
the Charter Review Committee was established and charged with its respon-
sibility. it was set forth at that time that the Council's emphasis was to
place Charter amendments before the electorate in the general election to be
held during November of 197h because of the anticipated maximum participation
in order to obtain a decision from a larger percentage of voters.
~
MOTIOf7: Councilman Seymour moved that Item Nos. 1, 7 and 9 of the Charter
Review Committee recommendations, as set forth on the City Attorney's draft
resolution, pertaining to Section SnI, Section 703(g) and Section 1211 of the
Charter of the City of :\naheim he placed on the ballot and that the City
Atton1ey prepare specific wording to be considered by the Council on August 17,
1976. Councilman Kott seconded the motion.
Council\.Jomal: Kaywc;)c1 '-¡~~qu:~sted some clarification to Item No.7,
specifically, what it ls intended to accomplish.
Hr. Talley reported th.~t the Committee merely wished to indicate the City
Attorney would ,york a ItO-hour ".;leek and did not intend to prohibit him from non-
conflict of interest consulting, writing, teaching, etc.
The proposed amendment to Section 607 of the Charter was also further
discussed, and Mr. Talley pointed out that if adopted this would provide an
opportunity, under the ground rules, for someone to harass or incapacitate one
or more City dep3rtments and thereby effectively remove the department head
from control of that department.
Followin~ discussion, both of the aforegoing motions carried by the
following vote:
AYES~
NOES:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
Seymour, Kott and Thorn
Kaywood and Roth
HaTTON: Councilman Seymour moved that an additional amendment be prepared
for Council consideration on August 17, 1976, relative to the setting of
utility rates; that these be worded so as to limit the amount of utility
revenues uhich could be transferred to the General Fund by using a step-down
formula such as the one set forth in the Utility Director's memorandum of July
JoJ 1976. specifically, usinp a first. second and third-year approach, starting
al. a liMitation of ~% the first year, 4% the second year. 2% the third year and
n7 in the fourth year and successive years thereé1fter.. Councilman Thorn
seccnded the motion.
Councilwoman Kaywood strongly objected to the proposal of this amendment
in£H,much as there has not been time for any discussion. She stated that no
advance notification was given that this would be discussed. She pointed out
that the City of Anaheim electric utility has contributed over the years to the
City's ability to maintain the Sl~O5 per $100 assessed valuation tax r~te, and
tl1at by effectively removing the ability of the utility to realize any profit,
this would also affect the Clty's ability to maintain that lower tax rate.
Sf
'( lie luded ~;' L r ¡ the
orruY¡,ent that "you've all lost your marbles."
'"
< -- <""""'U""~¿Ck<..<"<
-~«-
76-566
City Hall.! Anaheim, California - COUNCIL HINUTES - August 10, 1976, 1:30 P.H.
The aforegoing motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL HEHBERS:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
Kaywood
I
REQUEST FOR REDUCTION - CITY TAX RATE: :Mr. James Hebb, representinr; the Anaheim
Chamber of Commerce as Chairman of a task force to pro~est property taxes in
Anaheim, read a prepared statement to the Council indicating that the assessed
valuation of property in Anaheim has increased 13.3%, and if the City tax rate
remains the same, this will result in an intolerable increase in taxes for both
residential and business property owners of the City. Therefore, the Board of
Directors of the Chamber voted unanimously to ask the City of Anaheim to reduce
the tax rate by at least 9.1% to $.95 per $100 assessed valuation.
Mr. Webb recognized that the City's portion of the property tax accounts
for only 10% of the total amount, and that there are nunerous other taxing
agencies. He indicated that they would take this same appeal to those boards
as well. He Also recognized that the tax assessor's ability to upgrade the
assessments yearly with a computerized system have contributed greatly to the
increases.
.
Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that most cities the size of Anaheim have
property tax rates between $1.45 to $1.65, and noted that the City's electric
utility has had a good deal to do with its ability to maintain the $1.05 rate.
Further, Councilwoman Kaywood stressed that the entire picture be made very
clear, i.e., that with the current tax rate of $1.05 the owner of a $40,000
home, which is assessed at 1/4 its market value, pays City taxes of approxi-
mately $100 per year. She further urged that Mr. Webb, in the taxpayers'
protest meeting to be held, make the citizens aware that the City Council of
the City of Anaheim has held retail electric rates at 95% of Edison retail
rates, which would he equivalent to a 16% tax reduction, and which costs the
City $1.8 million dollars paid to Edison for electric power; that the City
Council did not pass on sanitatiqn rate increases, which again were paid to the
sanitation companies and which amounted to $500,000.
Councilman Kott challenged Hr. Hebb to supply the name of anyone home-
owner in the City of Anaheim who requested the Chamber of Commerce to assist
him with his taxation problem. He stated that the Chamber of Commerce does not
represent the residential homeowners. He voiced his opinion that the big
beneficiary of any lower tax rate would be the commercial and industrial
property owners. He suggested that Hr. Hebb review the budget and make some
suggestions as to where reductions might be made, and that perhaps a portion of
the reduction might come from the promotional budget appropriations for the
Chamber of Commerce which, in the 1976-77 Budget, amounts to $79,000.
Councilman Seymour stated that he was not fearful of taking another look
at the 1976-77 Budget to set up the alternatives and re-establish priorities so
as to find $700,000 to $800,000 to provide for a tax rate reduction and show
some leadership in this effort.
MOTION: Councilman Seymour moved that the City Manager be directed to
develop those alternatives Which would create a reduction in the budget of
expenses, of service levels, to equate to a 10% reduction in property taxes;
that these alternatives be brought before the City Council at the meeting of
August 24, 1976 for a decision. Councilman Kott seconded the motion.
Councilman Seymour clarified that he requested the City Manager to prepare
the alternatives inasmuch as he is familiar with those ~1ich would be the least
onerous to the Council. Those Which would not be considered for reduction in
service levels were enumerated as Police, Fire, Library and park development.
The aforegoing motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL ME}1BERS:
Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
Kaywood
Councilwoman Kaywood stated that she objected to this matter coming before
the Council after the budget had been adopted, M1ich, as far as she was
concerned, was a budget reduced dangerously close to the bottom line.
"
"'"
_. .
76-567
i=ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL HINUTE~ - August 10, lQ76. 1;30 P.rI.
~:orJSErJT CALENDAR ITEHS: On mot ion by Counc ilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman
Kaywood, the fol10winp actions were authorized in accordance with the reports
and recommendations furnished each Council Hember and as listed on the Consent
Calendar Agenda:
1. CLAIHS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to
the City's insurance carrier:
a. Claim submitted by Art Christensen for damage sustained to concrete
curb purportedly as a result of City truck activity during setting of a utility
pole on or about April 21, 1976.
b. Claim submitted by Ronald Leon and Edana Marie Paddock for personal
injuries and damages purportedly sustained as a result of traffic signal
malfunction, inadequate safety and warning devices on or about May 31, 197~.
c. Claim submitted by Robert Valdivia Garcia, Angela Flores Garcia, Jose
Flores Garcia, Evangeline Flores Garcia and Richard Flores Garcia for damages,
personal injuries and false imprisonment purportedly sustained as a result of
actions by Anaheim Police personnel on or about April 28, lq76.
d. Claim submitted by Henry M. Beans for damages sustained to vehicle
purportedly as a result of traffic signal malfunction on or about Hay 13, lq7~.
The following claims were denied and referred to the City's self-insurance
administrator:
a. Claim submitted by Hugh ~!. Glenn for damages to water pipe facilities
purportedly sustained from the water supply being turned off without notice on
or about July 14, 1976.
b. Claim submitted by David J. Yarnell for damages sustained to auto
exterior purportedly as a result of hot tar being sprayed on or about July 21,
1976.
2. AHUSE}1ENT DEVICE PERMIT: Amusement device permit to allow one T.V. Pon~
Game at the Hansa House, 1850 South Harbor Dou1evard, was approved in accord-
ance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police. (George R. Patterson,
applicant)
3. CORRESPONDENCE:
filed:
The following correspondence was ordered received and
a. Seal Beach Resolution No. 2478 - Requesting various taxing agencies to
lower their tax rate for 1976-77 in the same manner and proportion as the City
of Seal Beach.
b. Villa Park Resolut1.on no. 76-439 - Opposing the inadequate television
coverage of the Orange County elections.
c. Anaheim Public Library Monthly Statistical Report - June, 1976.
d. Community Redevelopment Commission - Minutes - July 14, 1976.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTIon NOS. 76R-480 THROUGH 76R-484: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution
Nos. 7~R-480 through 76R-484, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with
the reports and recommendations and certifications furnished each Council
Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-480 - STREET DEDICATION: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DEDICATING A PORTION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY FOR STREET,
HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Portion of Golf Course land adjacent to
Walnut Canyon Road)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-481 - PROPOSED ABANDONHENT NO. 75-17A: A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE ANn
ABANDON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND FIXING A DATE FOR HEARING THEREON. (August
31, 197~, 2:30 P.M.; to abandon a dedicated street commonly known as Trinidad
Street, south of Orangethorpe Avenue, west of Kellogg)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-482 - HaRK ORDER NO. 1602: A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF
"In'
,"1
'_"",',-d'~"'""""",,, "
-".o,
71 -';ht<
CitL.Jlall. Anaheim. C.alifornia .. COUNCIL ~lINUTES - August 10, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
.\',1. PLA~!T J tAilOR. ~FRVICE'; ~ HATETnA1.~ !\~m EQUIPMFJ!T AND ALL UTILITIF.S AND
T?ANSPORTATION prr.LUDINr. f'f1\-lER. F1JEL \~:n \,TATER t AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL HaRK
,_CESSARY TO CO'JSTRUCT NJn COHPU':TE THE FOLLOHING PUBL IC IMPROVEHENT, TO WIT:
STRECT LIGHT REcnN~TRUCTION~ ANAHEIM CENSUS TRACT 1'873. IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
~)RK ORDER NO. 160? (Steiny and Company, Inc.)
"--
RcsrLUTION NO. 76R-/¡83 - naRK ORDERS HOS. 788-1\ AND 81J: A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF TH[ CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERHININC THAT PUBLIC CON-
VENIC:1Cr. AnD NECESS ITY REOUIRE THE conSTRUCTION AND COHPLETION OF A PURL Ie
,
I"1?ROVE1ŒNT, TO HIT: THE HALLIDAY STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, ORANGE AVENUE TO
154' N/o RO~1E AVENU[. IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIH. \-YORK ORDER nos. 788 AND 812; .
APPRf1VIHG THE DESIGnS. PLANS. PROFILES, DRAUPIGS A}ID SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
conSTRUCTION THEREoF; !\UT11ORIZUIr, THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IHPROVfJ1ENT
PI ,COPJ)ANCE ~nTH ~;AID PLANS. SPEC IFICATIO!TS. ETC.; A~m AUTTIORI7.InC AND
DIRECTInG TIlE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A nOTICE IìJVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE
C'lNSTRUCTION THEREOF. (BIds to he Opened - September 2, 197';, 2:00 P.lf.)
Rr:SOLUTION ~~O. 7f;R-484 -- HORK ORDER NO.790-A: ^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUnCIl.
OF THE CITY OF ANAHrU1 FDTDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEIHENCE' A~m
n'::CESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COHPLETION OF ^ PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO
HfT: IllST ALLATION Of TRAFFIC SIGNALS .AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION
OF LA PALMA AND ROUIŒYA DRIVE. IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, \JORK ORDER NO. 790-A;
APPROVING THE DESIGNS. PLANS, PROFILES, DRAHINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
C)NSTRUCTION THEtillOF; AUT110RI;~IN(', THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEl'ŒNT
IJ ACCORDANCE \-JI TII SA In PLANS. SPECIFICATIOnS, ETC.; AtID AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTInG THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A HOTlCr. INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - September 9, 197h - 2:00 P.H.)
r, ~'1 ('" 11 "
"OJ. \~.i1., ,/ at,,~ :
À. "("1' r .
,c'. ,",.).
COUNCIL MEr-mET'S:
I".aywood, Seymour t Katt, Roth and Thorn
'.-r
COUNCIL>ŒImr:.S:
None
; ,.... .
ABSENT:
COUNCIL HEHBERS:
None
The Hayer declared Hesolution Nos. 76R-480 through 76R-484, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
CITY PLr\mn:¡C COHHISSION ITENS: The following actIons taken by the City Planning
Commission at their meetinf- held July 19, It)76, pertaining to the following
applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration.
nn motion by Councilr~n Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the
City Councl1 authorized the actions pertaining to the following envirönmental
impact requirements, as recommended by the City Planning CoMmission, and took
no further action on the following applications (Item Hos. 1 through 6):
1. ENVIROHMElJTAL DfPACT REPORT .-. CATEGORICAL EXEHPTION: The Planning Director
has determined that the proposed activities in the following listed zoning
applications fall within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, of the City
of Anaheim Guidelines to the 'requirements for an environmental impact report
and are. therefore. categorically exempt from the requirment to file an EIR:
Conditional Use Permit No~ 1634
Conditional Use Permit No. 1637
2. ENVIRONME1iTAL H1PACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: The Planning
Commission recommends to the City Council that the subject project in the
following listed zoning appli.:atlon be declared exempt from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report. pursuant to the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act:
Variance No. 2826
3. CONnITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1634: Submitted by K & B Center and Bechler
Corp.. to permit on-sale liquor in a bowling alley on CL zoned property located
at 1241 S~ Knott Street.
City Planning Commission Resolution Ho. PC76-138 granted Conditional Use
Permi t No. 1634..
'~'
..
.-.....-.-..,-.......-. --"._-~...-..
76-569
S=ltj Hall, Anaheim, Californta - COUNCIL PINUTES - August In, lQ7(;, 1 :3() P.M.
.. COHDITIŒJAL USE PERMIT NO. 1637: ~:ubmitted by Frederick 7.. D.eitler and
~1aurice Zief,ler to permit auto repair and painting in an existing industri;:¡l
complex on?~ zoned property located at 1290 Red Cum Street.
City Planning Commissi.on Resolution No. PC76-140 granted Conditional Vse
Permit Ho. 1637, conditionally.
'.,.
5. VARIAnCE no. 2826: Submitted by Bryan Industrial Properties, Inc. for
waiver of permitted primary uses to permit the retail sales of furniture on t~
zoned property located at Q9 East Orangethorpe Avenue.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC76-142 granted Variance Ho.
2826, conditionally.
6. VARIANCE 110. 2525: Submitted by Ambassador Industrial Corporation for an
extension of time to establish a mini-warehouse on ML zoned property located
southeast of Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana Freeway.
The City Planning Commission, by motion, granted a one-year extension of
time. MOTION CARRIED.
.
CITY PLANnING COMMISSION ITEMS: The following action taken by the City Planning
Commission at their meeting held July 19, 1976 was removed from the Consent
Calendar for discussion and separate action by the City Council:
1. COnDITIONAL USE PF.RtU.T NO. 1636: Submitted by Hilliam P. and Emma S.
Bredger to permit an80-unit motel on CG zoned property located at the north-
east corner of Katella Avenue and Easy Way was requested to be set for public
hearing by Councilman Seymour.
N~GATIVE DECLARATION - GRADING PEP~IT: On motion by Councilman Thorn, seconded by
Counci1nan Seymour, it was determined by the City Council th~t the application
for a grading permit filed by Anthony R. Coronado to construct a single-family
residence at 472 South Country Hill Road was exempt from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report, as recommended by the City Plannin~
Commission. HOTION CARRIED.
NEGATIVE nECLARATIO~ - GRADING PERMIT: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by
Councilwoman Y~ywood, it was determined by the City Council that the applica-
tion for a grading permit flIed by Jack O. Brown to construct a single-family
residence at 7630 Corto Road was exempt from the requirement to prepare an
env1romental impact report, as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
HCnION CARRIED.
NEGATIVE DECLARATIO~I - STREET IMPROVEMENT: (Euclid Street, from the Riverside
Freeway to La Palma Avenue) On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by
Councilwoman Kaywood, the application for negative declaration in connection
wtth a street improvement of Euclid Street from the Riverside Freeway to La
Palma Avenue submitted by the City of Anaheim Engineering Division was
continued to the meeting of August 17, 1976. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTIon NOS. 76R-485 THROUGH 76R-487 AND 76R-467: Councilman Kott offered
Resolution Nos. 76R-485 through 76R-487, both inclusive, and Resolution No.
76R-467 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-485 - HaRK ORDER NO. 783-A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THf. CITY OF ANAHEIH ACCEPTING A ~EALEJ) PROPO~AL AND AHARDING A
conTRACT TO TIlE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR, SERVICES, HATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT Ar-ID ALL UTILITIES AtID TRAN~PORTATION
INCLUDI11G POHF.R, ruEL AND PATER, AND PERFORMING ALL FORK NECESSAR'i TO CONSTRUCT
AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOHING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER
I!TSTALLATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF CRESCENT AVENUE AND NORTH STREET HITH LOARA
STREET, IN TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM, HORK ORDER NO. 783-A. (Steiny and Company -
$5.890.00)
RESOLUTI0l1 NO. 76R-486 - HaRK ORDER no. 868: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAllEIH ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AHARDltTG A CONTRACT TO
THE LOHEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR TIlE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES,
Tr
,',' .
'-~-'".'--'."'_.'.
,_.ü,-
.. '7 i :
City Hall. Anahein~.I .Cé~lifornia .. COUNCIL ~!INUTES - August 10, 197ó, 1:30 P.tt.
M\TfPl'F\IS ,^t-,Tlì [(\nTm1r'~1T "',ID ^<.1] 1frrII'I"'ìI'c. ^~' D mR~1<TSP(\ry'rATION IìTCLUDIHG PO,.Tr.R
".. ,,", I..~ iLi.. ~,'..)".:",.dl I,,;J 1"¡...- .10.4" ,,' ¡,<~ J.iu~", ,I, ~ 1'0:1 "O~.,
FUEL A!m HA TEF- p AND P[RFOrzÌ'~It1G tLL HOP-.K nECr:SSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COHPLETf. THE
FnLTfJiJU1G PUBLIC HiPROVEHENT: JUARE7. PARK CRAnING IHPROVEHEtIT, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEH1; HaRK ORDER NO. 868. (Raja Engineering - $11,554.00)
........
R:~SOLUTION NO. ì6R'~487 - ¡-JeRK ORDER NO. 1264: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAIIEIH ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND"AUARDING ^ CONTRACT TO
THE LOHEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHInG OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES,
t-tATERIALS AND EQUTPHENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POHER,
FlJEL t HATER, Atill PErFOR~ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE
FOLLOi,rrd1G PUBLIC IHPROVEtŒNT: Y,^TELLA AVENUE SEHER LATERAL EXTENSIONS, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHIEM, WORK ORDER NO. 1264. (George H. Robertson - $4,974.80)
RESOLUTIon !JO. 76R-/¡67 - LEGAL ADVERTISING OUTSIDE THE CITY LIr-nTS: A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH ACCEPTING A SEALED
P1<OPOSAL AND A~.:rARDnrC A COtlTRACT TO THE LO~ÆST RESPONSIBILE BIDDER m10SE BID
ErST RE~PO¡mS IN QUALITY t FITNESS AND CAPACITY, FOR ALL LEGAL ADVERTISING
REQUIRED BY L.\H TO BE PUBLISHED Dr A NEHSPAPER ()F GENERAL CIRCULATION, PRINTED
AND PUBLISHED OUTSIDE THE CITY, BUT HITHIN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. (Orange
County Evening News - $3.95 per column inch, first insertion; $3.16 per column
inch, second insertion)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES;
ABSEUT:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
COUNCIL l1EHTIERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 7óR-485 through 76R-487, both
inclusive, and Resolution No. 76R-467 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINj\l~CE NO. 3574:
Councilman Thorn offered Ordinance No. 3574 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
An ORDnlANCE OF THE CITyrFANAHEIH REPEALING SECTION 17.04.100.010 OF THE
Al1AHEIH Hu~nCIPAL CODE RELATING TO GRADING PERt-lIT FEES.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL HEHBERS:
COUNCIL ~JENBI~RS:
COUNCIL HEMBEP,S:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
none
none
NOES:
ABSENT:
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3574 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3575:
Councilman Thorn offered Ordinance, No. 3575 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
1.1'1 ORDIl1ANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMEtIDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZOnING. (74-75-39, RM-1200)
Roll Call Vote:
.\ YES ,~
~~OES :
ABSEITT :
COUNCIL }ŒMBERS:
COlmCIL HEMBERS:
COm~CIL MEHBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kett, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3575 duly passed and adopted.
ORI)n:A.~CE NOS. 3576 THROUGH 3581: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance Nos. 3576
through 3581, both inclusivet for first reading.
ORDINA~JCE NO. 3576: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH AJŒNDING TITLE 1,
CHAPTER 1. at.. SF-r.TIONS 1.04. 11 () AND 1.04. 190 OF THE ANAHEIH HUNICIPAJ., CODE
PERTAINInG TO CITY OEPARTHENTS.
.....;
1\
. --~..~<~~ -,_,~"_~."",,,,~'C.'.d U"",--_.
76-571
Cit)~ Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL HP¡UTES - August 10, 197/;, 1:30 P.H.
ORDr:^>~CE no. 3577: AN ORDINMICE (ìF TIfF CITY OF ANAHEIH REPEALING TITLE In,
CHAPTER 10.12. SECTIONS 10.12.020 AtID 10.12.025 AtTD TITLE fi, CHAPTER 6.21,
SECTION 6.21.140 OF THE ANAHEIH MJNICIPAL CODE RELATInG TO SAnITATION CHARGES.
ORDE¡k~CE ~m. 3578: AN ORDInANCE OF TIlE CITY OF ANAJIEIH AHENDTI7G TITLE 18 OF TIlE
A11AHEIH HUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (72-73-10(2), RH-1200)
'J'
ORDPIA:iCE NO. 3579: AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIH AMENDING TITLE 18 OF TITE
AUAlIEIH HUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO 7.0tTING. (72-73-51 (8), RS-HS-22 , 000)
ORDINANCE NO. 3580: AN ORDINfu~CE OF TIm CITY OF ANAHEIM AMEnDING TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (75-76-21, CO)
ORDInANCE NO. 3581: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AHENDING TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAIŒIH HUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69 (76). Nt)
Tlv\N~;FER - COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND - "FREDERICK LITTLE" HOUSE: On motion by
Councilwoman I:aywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council
authorized a transfer of $685 from the Council Contingency Fund for payment of
a deposit with the Pacific Telephone Company for relocation of telephone pole
lines in conjunction with the moving of the "Frederick Little" House. HOTION
CARRIED.
4
NO SHOKHIG BAN - CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER: Councilwoman Kaywood moved that the r..ity
Council ban smoking in the City Council Chamber. Councilman Roth seconded the
motion.
Councilman Kott left the Council Chamber.
(5:35 P.M.)
Said motion failed to carry by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
- ,tPORARIL Y ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL HEHBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood and Roth
Seymour and Thom
Kott
TEHPORARY UTILITY POLES - CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: Councilman Seymour requested
that a report be prepared and submitted to the City Council in conjunction with
the City of Anaheim utility policy on charging for temporary utility poles
placed at construction projects.
PERNISSION TO LEAVE THE STATE - COUNCILMAN ROTH: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, Councilman Roth was granted permission
to leave the state for 90 days. MOTION CARRIED.
~QU[ST TO OFFER ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITIONS: Councilman Roth stated that he would
like to be designated by the Council to write the arguments against the
proposed amendments to Sections 604, 701. 504 and 703(g) of the City Charter.
ADJOURÑ"MEHT: Councilman Roth moved to adj oum.
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Seymour seconded the
Adjourned:
5:40 P.M.
ALaNA H. HOUGARD. CITY CLERK
By:
".. ....¿,.'" f/...'I ,'0 <II--
~ -, ..~ '1[. '._£j"'{.,...,::....
De~
....'
,.¡', 1 ,