Loading...
1975/02/2575-171 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25~ 1975, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 'PRESBNT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts CITY CLERK: Alona M. Hougard DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Thom called the meeting to order at 1:45 p.m. FLAG SALUTE: Councilwoman Miriam Kaywood led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Thom and unanimously approved the City Council. "American Red Cross Month" - March 1975, accepted by Mrs. Eileen Anthony who presented the Mayor with an honorary Red Cross membership. "Student Vocational Nurses' Day" - April 28, 1975 and "Licensed Vocational Nurses' Week" - April 28 thru May 1, 1975. MINUTES: Approval of the minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meetings held February 4, and February 11, 1975, and adjourned regular meetings held February 5, February 10 and February 17, 1975 were deferred to the meeting of March 4, 1975. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $415,382.27, in accordance with the 1974-75 Budget, were approved. COMMENTS REGARDING PROPOSITION "A" PAMPHLET: Mayor Thom introduced a pamphlet published by the "Consumers for Lower Cost Electricity" and for the purposes of clarifidation, he stated he felt this brochure to be misleading and deceptive, and that he,as a Council Member of the City of Anaheim, does not believe it. He wished it to be known that he had nothing to do with assembling this pamphlet or with those who have affixed their names and are distributing same through the mail to residents of the City. He voiced the opinion that the only truth on this piece of literature is the wording of the ballot proposition itself printed on the back and he did not want any of the citizens to be under the impression that he had either endorsed or supported preparation of this brochure in any way. Councilman Seymour indicated that he was not familiar with the particular literature described by the Mayor, nor has he read any other literature, but he felt the electorate deserves to hear the truth, albeit difficult to com- ~municate on such a complex issue as generation of electrical power. Councilman Seymour further remarked that to the best of his ability to investi- gate the question of whether or not the city should become involved in genera- tion of electric power versus the purchase of same wholesale from Southern California Edison, his conclusion is that - yes, in fact there are dollars to be saved and there can be rate 'savings in the magnitude of 25% if the City invests in generation. Conversely, because of the fact that it is the City Council of the City of Anaheim who sets the electrical rates, the Anaheim electrical consumer has no assurance that, in fact, the city Council will pass these savings to them in the form of reduced electrical rates. Councilman Seymour remarked that he felt that it is incumbent upon this City Council to take some positive action to insure that when these savings occur, they are passed back to the consumer, as was promised. In this con- nection, he suggested that a question be placed on the ballot to amend the ID-ZIZ City. Ha.1..l~ ~n~heim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25, 1975, 1:30 P.M. City Charter to provide that all profits not less than 25% accrued by the City of Anaheim participating in generation should be passed directly back to the consumer and any profits above 25% could be used to relieve taxation. If such a Charter Amendment were approved by the voters,then they would be assured that they would receive the benefits promised from investment in the power generation projects because the decision would be removed from the field of politics. Councilman Seymour summarized that he would be in favor of such a charter amend- ment. Mayor Thom maintained that the literature was misleading and erroneous. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that the pamphlet does not indicate that these savings will not begin until 1979 or 1980 at the earliest. However, she stressed that if Anaheim does not go into generation and have some substantial means of saving large amounts, it means that those additional amounts will just be transferred to Edison instead of the people. Councilman Sneegas concurred that the pamphlet leaves something to be desired as to total validity, but noted that unfortunately most political advertising is of this nature. He remarked that he felt the total program has a lot of advantages to offer the people of Anaheim. He pointed out that no matter which way the savings are funneled back to the people, either through lower retail electrical rates or lower taxes, there are benefits to be derived from power generation inasmuch as the City will be saving tax dollars which are not being paid to Southern California Edison. ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY REPORT - RESULTS OF THE AUDIT PLANNING PROJECT: Mr. David White representing Arthur Young & Company presented the report on results of the review of audit planning. He indicated that the report submitted contains an in-depth discussion of the findings and recommendations and he would present a verbal summation of the highlights. The purpose of this review was to identify deficiencies in accounting systems and records which would prevent the City from obtaining an unqualified opinion on its financial statements. He described the procedures used to accomplish this task. The results of the project disclosed that certain changes must be made in the format of the City's annual financial statements in order to com~ly with the new guidelines set forth by the American Institute of Certified Public Account- ants which will be effective for the 1974-75 fiscal year. Mr. White stated that the fixed asset records, as currently maintained by the City, are not adequate to permit issuance of an unqualified opinion of a Certified Public Accountant, and he related certain of the inadequacies. If the City wished to immediately correct these deficiencies to obtain an unqualified opinion, it would be necessary to conduct a complete inventory of fixed assets coupled with reconstruction of costs and accumulated depreciation records, or have an appraisal of fixed assets performed by an independent appraising firm. Because such appraisals are very costly and because, at this time,Arthur Young & Company cannot attach any clear, direct, economic benefit to the obtaining of an appraisal and/or unqualified opinion on financial state- ments, it is recommended that the City not have such an appraisal made until it can be economically justified. However, because accurate fixed asset records are necessary to fulfill the stewardship relationship and further accurate cost and depreciation records are necessary for meaningful profit measurement for enterprise funds and for use in cost accounting procedures, it is recommended by Arthur Young & Company that the City develop and implement a fixed asset accounting system for all newly acquired assets. Once this system is opera- tional for 4 to 5 years, the City could obtain an unqualified opinion by per- forming appraisal of only long-life assets obtained prior to implementation of the fixed asset accounting system. This could be done at lower cost to the CitY. Mr. White reported that Arthur Young & Company anticipates further recom- mendations concerning the City's accounting system as the overall project pro- ceeds and would, therefore, suggest that implementation and development of this fixed asset accounting system be delayed for from 3 to 6 months until all of the recommended changes can be considered at once to assure the most efficient interface of all accounting system modifications. Councilman Seymour noted that it is a weighty decision which requires appropriate time for analysis,and he would prefer to defer decision in order to review the alternatives and recommendations. 7~-173 City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Murdoch stated that he receives the impression from this report that the Arthur Young & Company will describe the costs of providing or implementing a partial fixed asset accounting system at such time as the recommendations on the remainder of accounting procedures are presented. Mr. White replied affirmatively, noting that these costs will be presented together with detailed plans for system modifications. Councilman Seymour moved that the Council receive the'Arthur Young report om results of the audit planning project and, further, that the Council select which recommendation they will take action on, from those presented in this report two weeks from this date. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PRESENTATION AND REQUEST - KINGSMEN DRUM & BUGLE CORPS: Mr. Rocco Oliverio, Executive Director of the Southern California Kingsmen Drum & Bugle Corps was recognized by the Mayor and addressed the Council relative to the composition am~ activity of this group. He advised that this organization is celebrating their 10th ann/versary this year and involves 1200 young people from Anaheim and other Orange County Cities. Their performances have won 7 National Champion- ships and they currently have the World Championship. He noted that they per- form throughout the United States and have had more than $600,000 worth of National TV exposure. Their annual budget runs to $100,000 and they are spon- sored by various groups. Mr. Oliverio indicated that their problem, and the reason for this presen- tation today, is that they do not have a home for the Corps and consequently no address at which they can be reached. He stated that they would very much like to be officially sanctioned as the "Anaheim Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps" since that is the name they began with and they still feel most closely asso- ciated with this City. He further noted that 74% of their organization is from the City of Anaheim and they have had over 900 people involved in this group in the last 9 years from the City of Anaheim. An il-minute film was shown to the Council of the Kingsmen during the per-- formance which won their World Championship. At the conclusion of the presentation Mr. Oliverio advised that what the organization is seeking from the City basically is a home and a place to practice and perhaps store trophies and equipment. He noted they are not re- questing any financial support from the City. He outlined the type of consult- ing band programs in which they are currently involved and commented that they would propose to perform other services for the City, such as conduct free concerts in the parks or for Senior C~tizens and continue with the assistance currently being given the high school band groups. Mayor Thom thanked Mr. Oliverio for attending the meeting and for the presentation. He advised the members of Council that his reason for inviting the Kingsmen to the meeting this date was to solicit a reaction to Mr. Oliverio's request, that the City of Anaheim be the sponsoring organiza- tion and provide a home for the Kingsmen. Councilwoman Kaywood stated she would be interested in knowing what liability and costs to the City would be involved. Councilman Seymour stated he would be in favor of providing some of the capital needs of the organization, such as a structure for rehearsals and storage of equipment, but that he did not feel it is in the best interests of the Kingsmen organization to have the City subsidize its ongoing financial responsibilities. Mr. Oliverio reiterated that they are not, in fact, asking for any financial subsidy. He indicated they do have means to provide for these needs and are expanding them. The primary concern in this request is for a home for the organization. Councilman Seymour moved that the City Parks, Recreation and the Arts staff be directed to work with Mr. Oliverio on the possibility of the establishment of a home for the Kingsmen. Council Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 75-174 City Hall, AnaheJ.m, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25, 1975, %.:30 P.M. Mayor Thom stated that he felt this an outstanding organization with a fine reputation and he would like to see them able to use the name "Anaheim Kingsmen". Councilman Seymour left the Council Chamber (2:50 p.m.) CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the following actions were authorized in accordance with reports and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda: 1. PUBLIC DANCE, AMUSEMENT DEVICES PERMITS: The following permits were granted subject to the recommendations of the Chief Of Police: a. Public Dance Permit requested by Isabel A. Lopez, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana Lodge #24, for public dance to be held March 30, 1975 at Carpenter's Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. b. Public Dance Permit requested by Isabel A. Lopez, on behalf of Sociedad Pregresista Mexicana Lodge #24, for public dance to be held May 11, 1975 at Carpenter's Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. c. Amusement Devices Permit for one cocktail table pingpong game to be located at the Loose Caboose, 801 East Katella Avenue (Glen E. Batdorf, applicant). 2. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to the insurance carrier: a. Claim submitted by Daryl and Cheryl Kraft for damage sustained pur- portedly as a result of deficiency of water supply furnished by the City of Anaheim on and after November 20, 1974. b. Claim submitted by Mrs. Anna J. LiPuma for injuries purportedly sustained as a result of a fall at the Anaheim Convention Center on or about December 26, 1974. c. Claim submitted by Gwyneth Smiley for injuries sustained purportedly as a result of traffic signal malfunction on or about December 25, 1974. d. Claim submitted by Thomas Southwick for injuries and damage purportedly sustained as a result of the operating condition of a traffic signal on or about December 25, 1974 e. Claim submitted by Rex E. Allen for damage purportedly sustained as a condition of street while City crews were working on or about February 14, 1975. f. Claim submitted by Allstate District Claims Office (Douglas C. Elliott) for damages purportedly sustained as a result of collision with City vehicle on or about October 24, 1974. 3. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - WORK ORDER NO. 830: Change Order No. 1, Work Order No. 830 for Parkway Maintenance Office Building Addition was authorized con- sisting of increasing the amount by $663.00 as recommended by the City Engineer. 4. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed. a. Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County: Placentia Resolution No. 75-R-105. Newport Beach Resolutions Nos. 8434, 8435 & 8438. Los Alamitos Resolutions Nos. 713 & 717. b. City of Orange - Resolution No. 4081 - Requesting that the State of California give its highest priority to sound attenuation measures along the impacted portions of Route 57 freeway. c. State Solid Waste Management Board - Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Additions and Changes in the Regulations of the State Solid Waste Management Board. d. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Minutes - January 16, 1975. e. Airport Land Use Commission - Minutes - February 6, 1975. f. Anaheim Public Library Board - Highlights - Minutes - January 20, 1975. g. Community Redevelopment Commission - Minutes - January 22 and January 29, 1975. 75-175 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februar~ 25~ ~.975~ .1:30 P.M. h. Financial and Operating Reports for the months of Decembcr~ 1974 and January, 1975: December - Electrical Division January - Engineering Division " - Library " - Customer Service i. Cultural Arts Commission - Minutes - January 8, 1975. 5. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18(ZONING) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE - PUBLIC HEARING DATE: The date of March 18, 1975, 2:30 p.m.,was set as the public hearing date to consider amending Chapter 18.84 proposing tree preser- vation in the (SC) Scenic Corridor Zone - Overlay. 6. STREET NAME FOR PRIVATE STREET ("HENNING WAY"): The action and recommenda- tion of the City Planning Commission to approve the proposal to name an existing private street "Henning Way" to facilitate assignment of street numbers was ratified. Subject street is located east and roughly parallel to Anaheim Hills Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road and running south from Arboretum Drive. (Councilman Seymour temporarily absent) MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Seymour returned to Council Chamber (2:53 p.m.) CONSENT CALENDAR - RESOLUTION NOS. 75R-98 THROUGH 75R-99: Councilma~ Pebley offered Resolution Nos. 75R-98 and 75R-99 for adoption in accordance with the recommended action listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 74R-98 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Frank A. Billmeier, et ux.; Earl F. Vipond, et ux.; Vonde E. Pierson; Seymour Adler, et ux.; Fred Mohr) RESOLUTION NO.75R-99 - WORK ORDER NO. 830: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING FOWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FARKWAY MAINTENANCE OFFICE BUILDING ADDITION, 1426 EAST VERMONT AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 830. (Orange County Environ- mental Developers, Inc.) Roll Call Vote on the foregoing resolutions: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 75R-98 and 75R-99 duly passed and adopted. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS; Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held February 3, 1975 pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council authorized the actions pertaining to environmental impact require- ments as recommended by the Planning Commission and sustained the actions taken by the City Planning Commission in connection with the following applications (Item Nos. 1 through 6): 1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1130 (READVERTISED): The City Council ratified the determination of the Director of Development Services that the proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore, cate- gorically exempt from the requirement to file said report. 75-176 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25~ .1975~ 1:30 P.M. 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1130 (READVERTISED): Submitted by Martin Luther Hospital Inc., for an amendment to Resolution No. PC69-173 adopted in connec- tion with Conditional Use Permit No. 1130, to delete Condition No. 6 requiring that a parkway maintenance assessment district to provide for perpetual main- tenance of the median planter proposed on Romneya Drive shall be established in accordance with Council Policy No. 532. RM-1200 zoned property is located on the south side of Romneya Drive, west of Euclid Street (Martin Luther Hospital). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-24, denied without prejudice the request for deletion of Condition No. 6. 3. REQUEST - ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT: Request by the Orange County Sanitation District for an easement from the County.of Orange for an underground sewer transmission line south of the Riverside Freeway~ west of the Santa Fe Railroad, for a distance of approximately 350 feet. The property is on the site of an old refuse disposal station. The District has requested a determination as to whether the easement would be in conformance with the City of Anaheim General Plan. The City Planning Commission, by motion, determined that the proposed grant of easement to the Orange County Sanitation District for the Santa Ana River Imterceptor Sewer south of Riverside Freeway is in conformance with the City of Anaheim General Plan. 4. REQUEST - HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT: Submitted by Raymond Knecht requesting approval of a home occupation permit to allow a worm farm (for fishing bait) to be operated in the backyard of his residence at 1775 Bayless Street located in the RS-7200 Zone. The City Planning Commission, by motion, approved this activity as appro- priate as a home occupation. 5. TERMINATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1313: Submitted by Robert E. Maurer, President, Maurer Development Company, requesting termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 1313, in accordance with Planning Commission's recommendation in connection with the approval of Tentative Tract No. 7876, Revision No. 3. Property is located on the north side of Orangethorpe Avenue between Kellogg Drive and Post Lane. (V 2658). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-30, ter- minated Conditional Use Permit No. 1313. 6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1406 - CHANGE IN REQUIREMENTS: Submitted by 3ohn Millick, Vice President,Anaheim Hills, Inc., requesting a change in requirements regarding the roofing materials for the Anaheim Hills Racquet Club, property located at the northwest corner of Anaheim Hills Road and Nohl Ranch Road. The City Planning Commission, by motion, approved the use of "shangle" for this building only; and to be reviewed by them prior to use in other construction in the city. MOTION CARRIED. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: The following actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held February 3, 1975 were removed from the above mentioned Consent Calendar and submitted separately for City Council information and consideration: 1. VARIANCE NO. 2672 - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council ratified the determination of the Director of Development Services that the proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file said report. 75-177 City H~ll~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. 2. VARIANCE NO. 2672: Submitted by Bernardo Yorba to construct one integrated offsite tract sign on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located at the southeast corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Imperial Highway with code waivers of: a. maximum site. b. required temporary nature of offsite signs. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-29, granted said variance for a period of three years, subject to conditions. Councilwoman Kaywood inquired whether the applicant in connection with this variance which has been granted for a three-year period has paid a tract sign fee for this period. Mr. Roberts indicated that no such fee has been paid to date and there has been a question raised as to whether or not this type of incorporated signing would be subject to the existing fee schedule. However, if the existing fee schedule is used, the applicant would be required to pay a fee for a sign per- mit for a one-year period, renewable each.year. No further action was taken by the City Council. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 132 - (WITH SUPPLEMENTS NOS. 1 AND 2) AND TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 8418 AND 8647 Revision Nos. 2:' Developer John D. Lusk and Son, property located on the north side of Nohl Ranch Road east of the centerline of Nohl Canyon Road, Tract No. 8418 containing 80 propo§ed RS-HS- 10,000 zoned lots, Tract No. 8647 containing 104 proposed RS-HS-10,000 zoned lots. The City Planning Commission, at their regular meeting held February 3, 1975, approved tentative map of Tract No. 8418, Revision No. 2, subject to the following conditions~ 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivi- sion, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That a six-foot high, decorative, openwork wall shall be constructed at the top of the slope adjacent to Nohl Ranch Road. Plans for said wall shall be submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval prior to approval of the final tract map. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed within the slope areas of each lot adjacent to the roadway and in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall. Plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the property owner(s) shall assume responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping to the lot lines, and the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of the land- scaping in the Nohl Ranch Road right-of-way. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satis- factory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative. Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site drainage facilities 75-178 ~ity Hall~ Anahe.im~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have initiated condem- nation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 10. That all of the lots along the northerly perimeter of subject property which abuts Peralta Hills shall be developed with one-story single-family dwellings, and any two-story dwellings shall be constructed on the interior of the tract, as stipulated to by the developer. 11. That the lot lines for those lots lying along the north side of Street "A" shall be extended southerly across said Street "A" and include the slope area adjacent to Nohl Ranch Road, as stipulated to by the petitioner. 12. That Street "K" shall be developed according to the City of Anaheim standard detail for a Hillside Collector Street. 13. This tract shall not be constructed until after the street improvements for Tract No. 8647 (Revision No. 2) have been constructed. 14. That prior to approval of the final tract map, the petitioner shall make some provision, acceptable to the City Council, for the landscaping and maintenance of the slopes within and/or created by the development of this property. 15. That prior to approval of the final tract map, the petitioner shall submit final floor plans and elevations to the City Council for approval. The City Planning Commission, at their regular meeting held February 3, 1975, approved tentative map of Tract No. 8647, Revision No. 2, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That a 6-foot high, decorative, openwork wall shall be constructed at the top of the slope adjacent to Nohl Ranch Road on Lot Nos. 1 through 5. Plans for said wall shall be submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council for approval prior to approval of the final tract map. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed within the slope areas of each lot adjacent to the roadway and in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall. Plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superinten- dent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the prop- erty owner(s) shall assume responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping to the lot lines, and the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of the landscaping in the Nohl Ranch Road right-of-way. 3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That any proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropri&te by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satis- factory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading will be 75-179 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February. 25~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative. Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have initiated condem- nation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The required drainage facili- ties shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from higher properties through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request. 9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 10. That all of the lots along the northerly perimeter of subject property which abuts Peralta Hills shall be developed with one-story single-family dwellings, and any two-story dwellings shall be constructed On the interior of the tract, as stipulated to by the developer. 11. That the lot lines for those lots lying along the north side of Street "A" shall be extended southerly across said Street "A" and include the slope area adjacent to Nohl Ranch Road, as stipulated to by the petitioner. 12. That prior to approval of the final tract map, the petitioner shall make some provision, acceptable to the City Council, for the landscaping and maintenance of the slopes within and/or created by the development of this property. 13. That this tract shall be developed prior to the development of Tract No. 8418 (Revision No. 2). 14. That prior to approval of the final tract map, the petitioner shall submit final floor plans and elevations to the City Council for approval. The City Clerk submitted correspondence dated February 23, 1975 relative to Tentative Maps Tract Nos. 8418 and 8647, Revisions 2, from Mr. Cyrus Buzo on behalf of Mrs. Amador Buao indicating that the grading planned on subject tracts would create steep banks adjacent to their property creating a deep artificial canyon. Councilwoman Kaywood noted from the staff report that there is a recommenda- tion that bicycle lanes and walkways be provided in these tracts in an attempt to reduce traffic, but the plans do not indicate these. Mr. William D. Lusk, President of ,John D. Lusk & Son, advised that although bicycle lanes and walkways were considered originally, it was later decided that because of the topography of the area neither would be used very much and that is the only reason they were not included. Councilwoman Kaywood inquired how Mr. Lusk intended to alleviate the prob- lem just described in Mr. Buzo's letter. Mr. Lusk stated that subsequent to the last hearing before the Planning Commission, in response to this concern, his firm has been working with the City Engineering Department to alleviate this grade and soften the intersection which would tend to lower the slope bank. He further reported that at the time that an adjacent tract is built to the east, which he estimates to be 3 to 4 years away, the same grading criteria will be used to soften the areas in question and to create an undulating system of banks rather than a steep bank. He stated that in accordance with the agreement between his firm and the Peralta Hills Homeowner's Association they would submit maps to that Associa- tion before coming to the City regarding a new tract. Mr. Lusk indicated that he had offered and would still be willing to prepare a plan for Mr. Buzo and would like to meet with his engineer and his attorney to prepare such a plan for transitional area between the properties. He further reported, in answer to Councilwoman Kaywood, on negotiations under way with the City of Orange relative to the Meats Avenue extension. 75-180 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25, 1975~ 1:30 P.M. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 132 - CERTIFICATION: E.I.R. No. 132, togather with Supplements No. 1 and 2, having been reviewed by the City staff and recom- mended by the City Planning Commission to be in compliance with City and State guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such information and belief does hereby certify that E.I.R. No. 132, together with Supplement Nos. 1 and 2, is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour. MOTION CARRIED. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour, tentative maps,Tract Nos. 8418 and 8647, Revision Nos. 2, were approved subject to the recommendatiomof the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Pebley left the Council Chamber (3:10 p.m.). 3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 143: E.I.R. No. 143 (Supplementary to E.I.R. 80) regarding Anaheim Hills Equestrian Center was submitted together with City Planning Commission recommendation that the City Council certify said E.I.R. to be in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act. Property is located south of the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, southwest of the intersection of Nohl Ranch Road and Country Club Road. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, E.I.R. No. 143, supplementary to E.I.R. No. 80, having been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the City Planning Commission to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council, acting upon such information and belief, does hereby certify that E.I.R. No.143 is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines. (Councilman Pebley temporarily absent). MOTION CARRIED. 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1453: Submitted by Doris Gibson, President, Home of the Ministering Angel, for approval of revised plans for the conver- sion of an existing cement block barn and tack room into sleeping quarters. Property is located on the southwest side of a private road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road. and is developed with a boarding and lodging home for the care of 15 emotionally disturbed, mentally retarded children (in an existing dwelling). The City Planning Commission determined that the revised plans are sub- stantially in accordance with the original approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 1453 and approved the conversion subject to the condition that the structure be brought up to Code and that the number of children housed at the subject location shall not exceed the originally approved number of 15. Councilman Pebley returned to the Council Chamber (3:12 p.m.). In answer to Councilwoman Kaywood's concern as to whether or not the children to be housed in this ancillary structure would be completely supervised by adults, Mr. Roberts reported that although this aspect was not discussed with the applicant at the Planning Commission level, it was indi- cated in discussions with said applicant that the children would be super- vised at all times. He further pointed out that this facility is regulated in this regard by the State of California. No further action was taken by the City Council. 5. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF REVISED PLANS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 72-73-34 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1375: Submitted by James W. McAlvin, Administrator, Anaheim Memorial Hospital, requesting.approval of revised plans for a proposed addition to the existing hospital facilities. C-O zoned property is located at the northwest corner of La Palma Avenue and West Street and is developed with the Anaheim Memorial Hospital medical complex. The City Planning Commission, by motion, approved the revised plans for the proposed addition as being substantially in conformance with the original approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 1375. No further action was taken by the City Council. 75-181 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL.~_~M_I_N_U~..E_S_~L..~T~.~2?.ry 25, 1975, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-100 - PROPOSED STREET N~ME CHANGE: Proposal to consider a change from the name State College Boulevard to University Boulevard for that portion of State College Boulevard extending north and south within the City of Anaheim was submitted,together with City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC75-26 recommending denial of said proposed street name change. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-100: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 75R-100 for adoption, sustaining the recommendation of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING A REQUEST FOR STREET NAME CHANGE (STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD). Roll Call Vote. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom. NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 75R-100 duly passed and adopted. EXTENSION OF TIME - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 73-74-44, TENTATIVE'TRACT NO. 8340: Request of Mr. Thomas J. O'Keefe of O'Keefe, Recht, Schwarzstein & Howald, 2323 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California, 92706, was submitted for a six- month extension of time to Reclassification No. 73-74-44 and Tentative Tract No. 8340,together with report from the City Engineer and Development Services Department recommending said extension be granted. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, a one- year extension of time to Reclassification No. 73-74-44 and Tentative Tract No. 8340 was granted, to expire April 2, 1976. MOTION CARRIED. EXTENSION OF TIME - TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NO. 7422, REVISION NO. 2: Request of Mr. Dudley B. Frank, Bill Miller Realty, 2062 Business Center Drive, Irvine, California 92664, was submitted for extension of time to Tentative Map Tract No. 7422, Revision No. 2, together with report from the City Engineer and Development Services Department. In reply to Council question as to whether or not current site development standards would be applicable to this tract, Mr. Roberts reported that the subject tract map designates only the configuration of the lots and street patterns and does not show setbacks or parking, but that these things would be considered when he requests a building permit, and the project would then be subject to the regulations in force at the time the building permit is requested. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, a one-year extension of time was granted to Tentative Map Tract No. 7422, Revision No. 2 to expire March 27, 1976. To this motion Councilwoman Kaywood ~oted "no". MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 8678: Developer I. P. S. of Orange,California; tract located north of Miraloma Avenue, west of the Orange Freeway; containing 8 RM 1200 zoned lots. The City Engineer reported that said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved and required fees were paid. He recommended approval subject to receipt of tract improvement bonds. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Seymour moved that Final Map Tract No. 8678 be approved subject to receipt of tract improvement bonds and approval thereof by the City Attorney. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. To this motion Councilwoman Kaywood voted "no". MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 7735: Developer Classic Development Corporation; tract located on the north side of Santa Aha Canyon Road between Eucalyptus Drive and Fairmont Boulevard; containing 58 RS-7200 zoned lots. 75-182 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February...25~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. The City Engineer recommended approval and reported that said final map conforms substantially to the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been posted and forwarded to the City Attorney for approval and required fees paid. In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Roberts reported that a variance was approved in conjunction with this tract (Variance No. 2327) and to allow some of the lots within said tract to be reduced to 6,000 square feet, but that there are none smaller than 6,000 square feet and the average lot size of all lots approved was at least 7,200 square feet. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that Final Map Tract No. 7735 be approved subject to approval of required bond by the City Attorney. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. To this motion Councilwoman Kaywood voted "no". MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Seymour pointed out that approval of a final tract map is basically a ministerial act and by that definition, there is no other action which the Council can take but to approve same. He stated that at the final map stage, it does not matter whether a Council Member approves the project itself, the zoning or density those questions were resolved a long time previous, and there is nothing which can be done at this point to change these decisions. He noted that other members of the Council might also be opposed to the particular project, but if they too voted "no", then the City Council would place th~ City in jeopardy of a lawsuit. Councilwoman Kaywood was of the opinion that it would be very unlikely with t he present Council that this would occur and she stated that she wishes to register her vote as an objection. Councilman Seymour voiced the opinion that this constitutes irresponsible voting unless Councilwoman Kaywood is willing to utilize the taxpayer's money to face the lawsuit which might ensue. FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 8075: Developer, Anaheim Hills, Inc.; tract located both north and south of Serrano Avenue, east of Hidden Canyon Road; containing 180 RS-7200 zoned lots. The City Engineer reported that said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been forwarded to the City Attorney for approval and required fees paid. Further, the City Engineer recommended approval of Final Map Tract No. 8075, subject to approval of the Landscape Maintenance Agreement by the City Attorney's Office and approval of final specific plans by the City Planning Commission. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Seymour moved that Final Map Tract No. 8075 be approved subject to the conditions recommended by the City Engineer and listed hereinabove. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 8514: Developer, S.I.R. Development Company; property located northwest of Hidden Canyon Road, west of Serrano Avenue; containing 44 RM-2400 zoned lots. The City Engineer reported that said final map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been forwarded to the City Attorney for approval and required fees paid. The City Engineer recommended approval of Final Map Tract No. 8514 subject to approval of the final specific plans by the Planning Commission. On recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that Final Map Tract No. 8514 be approved subject to approval of the final specific plans by the Planning Commission. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PARCEL MAP NO. 452 CONDI%IONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1468: Report from the City Engineer recommending that Parcel MaP No. 452, 'filed as a condition of Conditional Use Permit No. 1468,be approved subject to recordation of an offer of conditional dedication for Medical Center Drive, was submitted. Property in question is located between Medical Center Drive and Romneya Drive, west of Euclid Street. 75-183 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February ,25~ 1975; 1:30 P.M. Mr. Maddox advised that it would be necessary to revise the conditions set forth in his report to approve Parcel Map No. 452 subject to receipt by the City of an offer of conditional dedication for Medical Center Drive. Mr. Clough, General Engineer for Forest Lawn Memorial Parks and Mortuaries explained the reason for the requested change. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council approved Parcel Map No. 452 subject to receipt of an offer of condi- tional dedication for Medical Center Drive as recommended by the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Sneegas left the Council Chamber (3:35 p.m.). TEMPORARY ACCESS TO HARBOR BOULEVARD - VARIANCE NO. 2663: On recommendation from the City Planning Commission an additional period of time was granted for temporary access to Harbor Boulevard, retroactive to May 24, 1972,and expiring May 24, 1978, for property located on the east side of Harbor Boulevard, north of Hampshire Avenue, until such time as adjacent parcels are zoned CO and an alternate method of access established to serve all the lots on the east side of Harbor Boulevard, on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley. Councilman Sneegas temporarily absent. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-101 - SUPPORTING THE ORANGE COL~TY HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL AS DESIGNATED HEALTH SYSTEMS AGENCY: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 75R-101 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPPORTING THE ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL AND ITS DESIGNATION AS THE HEALTH'SERVICES AGENCY FOR ORANGE COUNTY. Roll Call Vote. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom. NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-101 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Sneegas returned to Council Chamber (3:36 p.m.). PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - POWER SWEEPER: The City Manager reported on the recommended purchase of one power sweeper for the Stadium and advised that Tennant Company has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $8,439.04 including tax. He thereupon recommended the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, purchase was authorized in the amount of $8,439.04 including tax, as recommended by the City Manager. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - FOUR-DOOR SEDAN: The City Manager reported on · informal bids received for the purchase of one four-door sedan and recommended acceptance of the low bid received from Hardin Oldsmobile in the amount of $6,625.00 including tax. The City Manager reported that this vehicle is proposed to replace the one currently assigned to his use and that the car offered by the low bidder is not actually new, it has been used in a parade and consequently they have quoted a very competitive price. Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of purchasing a more economical model, and Mr. Murdoch explained the rationale behind purchasing a higher quality car for top administrative use has been that this vehicle would be used whenever it is necessary to transport visiting dignitaries. 75-184 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the low bid of Hardin Oldsmobile was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $6,625.00 including tax. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 3402: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3402 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 7, CHAPTER 7.28 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 7.28.020, RELATING TO LOITERING ON PUBLIC SCHOOL PREMISES. (Unlawful to loiter in or upon grounds of public schools between the hours of 10:30 P.M. and 5:00 A.M. of the following day unless authorized.) ORDINANCE NO. 3403: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3403 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-5 (3) - RS-5000, Tract No. 7787) RESOLUTION NO. 75R-102 - AMENDMENT TO MANPOWER CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT: The City Manager outlined in detail the revisions which were proposed to the Manpower Consortium Agreement by the member entities and he recommended that if Council approves of these delineated changes that the Council adopt a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and order of intent. (Proposed amendment with suggested changes indicated thereon on file in the office of the City Clerk.) Mr. Murdoch reported that the following is an alternative paragraph which may be included at Council's discretion, and would constitute paragraph No. 14 on page 8 of the Agreement: "A management review panel is hereby created consisting of the Chief Administrative Officers of the parties to this agreement to assist the Executive Director in developing administrative procedures and management guidelines." RESOLUTION NO. 75R-102: At the conclusion of the City Manager's explanation of proposed changes and discussion, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-102 for adoption authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the Orange County Manpower Com- mission as outlined by the City Manager and on file in the office of the City Clerk, including the alternative paragraph No. 14 on page 8. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, THE CITIES OF SANTA ANA, ANAHEIM, HUNTINGTON BEACH, AND GARDEN GROVE RELATING TO THE ORANGE COUNTY MANPOWER COMMISSION, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roi1 Call Vote. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom. NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-102 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Seymour left the Council Chamber (4:00 P.M.). RESOLUTION NO. 75R-103 - AUTHORIZING CERTAIN NAMED INDIVIDUALS TO REPRESENT THE CITY IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT: On report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 75R-103 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING CERTAIN PERSONS TO REPRESENT THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IN SMALL CLAIMS ACTIONS: AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 73R-456. 75-185 City ~all~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25~ 1975, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom. NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-103 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Seymour returned to Council Chamber (4:03 P.M.). STATUS OF HERMAN MARGULIBUX PRODUCE STAND (VARIANCE NO. 2647): The City Attorney stated that copies of "Notice of Motion for Preliminary Injunction" filed by Mr. Margulieux's attorney have been distributed to the Council. Further, the City's Zoning Enforcement Officer has issued a citation to Mr. Margulieux this date which will have the effect of getting this matter into Municipal Court to determine whether or not his use of the premises is lawful. REPORT - AVAILABILITY OF SPACE IN CITY PARKING LOTS FOR USE BY THE ANTLERS HOTEL: In response to Council direction given at the meeting of February 18, 1975, Mr. Murdoch reported on the availability of parking spaces in City Lots 1, 2 and 3 situated in the downtown area Following brief discussion on recommendations of the City Manager and the City Attorney, the Council directed the City Attorney's Office to draft an amendment to the Code to allow early morning parking on either City Lots 2 or 3 without the two-hour restriction; the particular lot to be at the discretion of the Antler's Hotel Management. BUENA PARK VARIANCE NO. 714: Continued from the meeting of February 18, 1975, pending receipt of verbatim transcripts of proceedings before the Buena Park Planning Commission pertaining to discussion of potential annexation of property located at the westerly terminus of Savanna Street, to the City of Anaheim. Councilman Seymour recapitulated the proceedings which had taken place at the February 18, 1975 Council meeting and advised that at the conclusion of discussion the Council, by motion, recommended that the City of Buena Park deny Variance No. V714 and recommend to the developer that he apply for annexa- tion to the City of Anaheim; or in lieu thereof, if said variance is approved by the City of Buena Park, and if the property owner indicates his intent to annex to the City of Anaheim, that the development conform to all applicable site development standards of the City of Anaheim. Further~ at that meeting verbatim transcripts were requested of the proceedings before the Buena Park Planning Commission because of allegation made that certain City of Anaheim employees were directly recommending circumvention of the City of Anaheim's site development standards. The City Clerk submitted the requested transcripts which were forwarded from the City of Buena Park and advised that these were just received this afternoon during the Council meeting. She further reported that this matter will be heard on appeal before the Buena Park City Council on Monday, March 3, 1975. Mrs. William Todd, Jr., 3620 Savanna Street, and Mrs. Hart, 3640 Savanna Street, requested that the Anaheim City Council stand behind this motion. They called attention to the potential parking problems which the apartment complex would generate. Mrs. Hart pointed out that if the cul-de-sac is constructed as planned, with one-half of it on Mr. Rossworn's property, the other one-half,when ultimately constructed, would be right at her front door. Discussion ensued regarding the 1969 general plan amendment which designated this particular area for multiple-family residential, and the citizens present indicated to Council that much of the ownership of the property has changed in the past five years, and these current property owners are not interested in developing their property but wish to retain its rural atmosphere. J i .I . I I _ I i 75-186 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25; 1975~ 1:30 P.M. At the conclusion of this discussion Council suggested that the Anaheim citizens contact Development Services Department to obtain specific information as to what regulations the R$-A-43~00 zone would impose on the area, and if they wish the City Planning Commission to review the general plan amendment for the area and make further recommendations on rezoning the property to agricultural, they may make such a request. Mrs. Todd questioned several points, specifically as to whether the arrangement whereby Mr. Rossworn's property would be located in Buena Park and serviced by Anaheim Utilities would cause any problems and further, whether the Buena Park or Anaheim Police would respond to calls in complaint regarding this property. Council replied that the two 'cities mutually provide water, sewer and/or electric services along the boundaries according to the manner most logical. In the event of necessity for police and fire service, there are reciprocal agreements with neighboring fire departments and although no such agreement exists for the police departments, usually units from both departments respond. At the conclusion of discussion, by general consent, the Council deter'- mined to stand on the motion, duly made, seconded and carried at the meeting of February 18, 1975, with respect to their recommendation to the City Council of the City of Buena Park in regard to Buena Park Variance No. V-714. CONTINUED DECISION - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION BUDGET FOR FIRST YEAR PROGRAM: Subsequent to Council discussion and direction given following the public hearing held February 18, 1975 on the Community Development Act proposal, specifically that the $102,000 allocated for air conditioning at the Chartres Recreation Center be deleted and these funds placed into housing or neighborhood improvements, Mr. Ron Thompson reported on the following proposed revisions to the draft budget: 1. That $24,000 be added to the housing repair project, increasing the number of houses to be repaired from +5 to +10 in the first year. 2. Addition of $78,000 to the project area for neighborhood improvements a. $66,000 for upgrading of 4 KV electrical transmission system to 12 KV. b. $12,000 for additional sidewalk, curb and gutter repair. In addition, Mr. Thompson reported that subsequent to the preparation of this report to Council, staff has ascertained that there are some additional monies which could be applied to the project area in the way of indirect costs, which would allow another $14,000 to be used within the target project area which had not previously been indicated. Staff would recommend that this additional sum be used for sewer reconstruction. He concluded that if Council concurs with the proposed revisions as delineated to the draft budget, this will be revised to incorporate same and presented at the Council meeting of March 4, 1975 for formal action following consideration of the environmental impact report. Councilman Seymour stated that once the allocation of $102,000 for the air conditioning of the Chartres Recreation Center is removed from the Community Development Act Budget, it would be his suggestion that this air conditioning system be provided through a redevelopment fund or included in the 1975-76 budget, to be accomplished during the calendar year 1975. Councilwoman Kaywood urged that if the air conditioning project is going to be accomplished in 1975 that it be undertaken quickly, before the onset of the summer season so as to obtain a better price and also so that the system be installed and operational when it is needed during the summer, months. Councilman Sneegas stated that he had no objections to the theory of the proposed budget revision, however, he pointed out that conversion of electrical distribution system from 4 KV to 12 KV is a capital improvement of the electric utility and should, therefore, come out of utility funds. He indicated that if the electric utility is operating as a revenue producing enterprise, then the proceeds should be able to cover the costs for such capital improvements,and it should not be necessary to utilize Federal funds to accomplish these things. 75-187 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25~ 1975; 1:30 P.M. Mayor Thom indicated he was glad that Councilman Sneegas brought this point out and added that he also felt this type of capital improvement should be done as a part of the operation of the utility, and if there are not suffi- cient funds to take care of these items, then he would question whether the City should be in the utility business. Councilman Seymour pointed out that the same philosophy would apply to the undergrounding of existing utilities, and realizing what a tremendous financial burden that would place on the City's utility, he personally would be willing to seek Federal monies to accomplish that project as well if it were possible. Councilman Sneegas stated that he felt the expenditure of these funds on air conditioning for the Recreation Center is an area which will certainly make life better for some of the people,whereas he was not convinced that the conversion of the electric distribution system would upgrade the lives of the people in the project area in any direct way. Furthen he noted that this conversion program has not been listed as a priority, nor was it budgeted previousl~ whereas conversely the air conditioning has been talked about and listed as a priority item several times. He compared the situation to his own business, noting that if he has to borrow money to replace fixtures or make capital improvements then he is aware that there are bookkeeping problems in that an insufficient amount of money ia being put away to take care of these expenditures. Councilman Seymour agreed that this analogy may apply to the Anaheim electric utility in the area of depreciation and that he would suggest the question be raised during the 1975-76 Budget hearings. Councilman Seymour further pointed out that Council so far in this discussion has mentioned the fact that the public input received'during the two public hearings showed the citizens obviously in favor of spending the $102,000 in question on housing repairs and neighborhood improvement. There- fore if the community development plan is supposed to reflect community input, then the Council~hould be consistent with what the public has requested and what staff has recommended in accordance with this input. Councilwoman Kaywood noted that the funds made available to the City through the Community Development Act of 1974 were earmarked specifically for repair and upgrading of existing facilities and structures and pointed out that sewer and alley reconstruction were not listed on any priority list either, but given the opportunity provided by these funds and having selected this particular target area for ,the first year's project, these items listed in the budget are the priority items for the pilot project neighborhood. Further Council discussion ensued during which Mr. Murdoch explained what impact upgrading of the electrical transmission system would have on the homes in the project area, which mainly would be in better voltage regula- tion and would not have any effect on capacity. Councilman Seymour stated that part of the effect would be that the lights in this particular section of the City would not be as likely to go dim and as susceptible to "brown-outs" and he would consider this a direct improvement for the homes in that area. Councilman Seymour thereupon moved that the Council approve the amendments as outlined by staff to be included in the final budget for the Community Development Act application. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. To this motion Councilmen Pebley and Sneegas voted "no". MOTION CARRIED. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING - FAIRMONT BOULEVARD GENERAL ALIGNMRNT: Councilwoman Kaywood stated that'she had received correspondence which calls attention to the fact that the public hearing on the general alignment of Fair- mont Boulevard, continued from the Council meeting of November 19, 1974, is scheduled on March 4, 1975 which is election day. She suggested that Council consider postponing this continued public hearing to another date. The City Clerk ascertained that the City Engineer was preparing to request this hearing be continued to April 15, 1975, and, by general Council consent, it was determined that the intent of the Council is that at the March 4, 1975 meeting they would continue the scheduled public hearing on the general align- ment of Fairmont Boulevard to April 15, 1975. 75-188 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES .- February 25, 1975, 1:30 P.M. STATUS OF FLOOD PLAIN INSURANCE: In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Murdoch reported that both he and Councilman Seymour intend to attend sessions in Washington D.C. next week, together with Mr. William Morgan, the City's Man in Washington, regarding the Flood Plain Insurance. SANTA BARBARA NEWSRACKS: Councilwoman Kaywood questioned whether the City had received any plans, specifications or pictures of the newsracks in Santa Barbara which she called attention to some time ago. Mr. Murdoch replied that the City of Santa Barbara, in compliance with their request, forwarded a copy of an ordinance describing the methods used to provide these newsracks, but no pictures or specifications were received. He stated he would follow up on the request. INVESTMENT ANALYSIS INFORMATION - CONTRACT MANAGEMENT OF THE ANAHEIM HILLS GOLF COURSE: Councilman Seymour read to the Council a letter which he had received from Mr. Lewis Dexter, 305 North Ranchito Street, Anaheim, California 92801, a University Instructor in Business and Managerial Economics, dated February 25, 1975, on the subject of the information reported to Council in connection with the proposed golf course lease at their meeting of February 11, 1975. Mr. Dexter's letter indicates that the City Manager's report presented information which was ~nadequate from an investment analysis viewpoint and was simplistic in its approach. He recommended that the Council require the following be included in information presented in connection with the proposed lease-manage- ment contract: 1. Cost benefit approach using discounted future dollar streams of income and costs. 2. Evaluation o£ all alternative investment possibilities for all the City property involved in this issue and portions of this property as feasible. 3. Evaluation of all costs involved including the escapable costs - those costs that can be eliminated through a closing or withdrawal of an operation. Councilman Seymour concluded that it is obvious to him the data which has been provided the City Council to make an investment decision of this magnitude is totally inadequate. He, therefore, requested that the appropriate financial studies and reports be provided to the Council which would supply the information with which to make a rationale analysis of the situation. Mr. Murdoch pointed out that Mr. Dexter's letter is appropriate from the standpoint of analyzing comparative values of an investment or a business enter- prise to operate the golf courses, however, that was not the purpose for which this particular information was presented; the purpose of that information was to show what the effect would be of the sale of City properties which could be determined excess. Councilman Seymour advised that the information which was provided is being used to evaluate the advantages or disadvantages of management by the City versus management by private enterprise because no other information has been supplied. Discussion ensued relative to the sale of property set aside for the third 9 holes of the golf course, during which Councilman Pebley stated that the value of this property will be determined by the density which the Council permits. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that the Canyon Area General Plan and Task Force is very much against the suggestS, on of selling any of that property ad- jacent to the golf course for development since it was designated open space. Councilman Seymour emphasized during this discussion that the relative value of that property cannot tell the Council whether or not a management concern can do a better job of managing the golf course than the City itself. He stated that he would like to receive data on which he could base an intelligent deci- sion in this matter; i.e., data which tells the story factually and projects it realistically in terms of the proposed contract and it also may seek alternatives. APPOINTMENT - VOTING DELEGATE, ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES: Councilman Seymour moved that Councilwoman Kaywood be appointed the Anaheim City Council's voting delegate to the Orange County Division of the League of Cali- fornia Cities, in the absence of Mayor Thom and himself. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 74-189 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 25~ 1975, 1:30 P.M. RESIGNATION - REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - GENE MC DANIEL: Mayor Thom read a letter dated February 19, 1975 from Mr. Gene McDaniel, submitting his resignation from the Community Redevelopment Commission effective March 1,, 1975. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council accepted Mr. McDaniel's resignation with regret and advised the City Clerk to express their sincere appreciation for services rendered on the Commission. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to Executive Session. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:20 P.M.) After recess Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 6:15 P.M. City Clerk