Loading...
1975/08/197.5-752 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19, 1975~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom ABSENT: COUNCIL M~,~ERS: None PRESENT; ACTING ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William Griffith CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts CITY CLERK: Alona M. Hougard DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts FIRE CHIEF: James Riley DISASTER SERVICES COORDINATOR: Paul Hayes ELECTRICAL SUFERINTEWOENT; George Edwards DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson FINANCE DIRECTOR: Mike Ringer ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santahlati MANPOWER PLANNER: William Hepburn PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry McRae City Clerk Alona Hougard called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. and advised those in attendance that the Council Members.were attending the funeral of Police Officer Gary Nelson, and the items scheduled on the agenda will be considered upon their return. The City Council convened at 2:35 p.m., immediately following the adjournment of the Community Development Commission meeting. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ralph Sneegas led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE: The following Resolution of Condolence was unanimously adopted by the City Council: "RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Council and the municipal staff are saddened by the untimely death of Officer Gary Anthony Nelson while he was engaged in a police surveillance operation on August 15, 1975; and WHEREAS, Officer Nelson had served with honor and distinction on the Anaheim Police Department for 11 years; and WHEREAS, Officer Nelson was one of the original volunteers for service in the Angel Helicopter program of the Anaheim Police Department; and WHEREAS, Officer Nelson had attained great proficiency in the operation of the helicopters of the Anaheim Police Department, achieving the status of Flight Instructor with certification by the Federal Aviation Administration. NOW BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the City of Anaheim has suffered great loss in the passing of Officer Gary Anthony Nelson and the City Council extends deepest sympathy to the family of this dedicated servant of peace, justice and. the most noble principles of the American way of life. AUTHORIZED by the Anaheim City Council this 19th day of August, 1975. ATTEST: /s/ Alona M. Hougard CITY CLERK, CITY OF ANAHEIM /s/ W. J. Bill Thom W. J. BILL THOM, MAYOR /s/ John Seymour JOHN SEYMOUR, MAYOR PRO T~.! /s/ Miriam Ka...~wood MIRIAM KAYWOOD, COUNCILWOMAN /s/ Calvin L. Pebley CALVIN L. PEBLEY, COUNCILMAN /s/ Ralph G. Snee~as RALPH O. SNEEOAS, COUNCILMA'~" 75-753 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19~ 1975~ 1;30 P.M. RESOLUTION - EXTENDING SYMPATHY AND WISHES FOR RECOVERY: A Resolution extending deepest sympathy and prayerful wishes for a speedy and complete recovery to Anaheim Police Officer Eugene DePartee from the serious injuries sustained while engaged in a police surveillance operation was unanimously authorized by the City Council. MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved that the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting held June 24, 1975 be approved with the following corrections to Page 75-566: Add the words "including our Manpower Planning Office" at the'end of the final sentence under the Title "Audit Report - The People Center, Inc. Activity". Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held July 1, 1975 and Adjourned Regular Meeting held June 30, 1975 were approved as corrected (typographical errors) on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCE AN~ RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Sneegas moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $711,353.48, in accordance with the 1975-76 Budget were approved. REPORT - RESULTS OF THE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AUDIT - FIRE DEPARTMENT, ARTtiUR YOUNG & COMPANY: Mr. Roger Hewitt of Arthur Young & Company presented copies of the report to Council Members on the results of the management practices audit conducted in the Fire Department. (Copy of said report on file in the office of the City Clerk.) Mr. Hewitt briefly explained the objectives of the study and summarized the scope of the review which was conducted. Mr. Hewitt reported that the results of the review showed the Anaheim Fire Department to be operating in an efficient and effective manner in delivering fire protection to the community. They are extremely well managed by highly competent leadership, which has contributed a great deal towards increasing the fire protection services to the community without unnecessarily increasing costs. There is a significant increase in the level of services provided during what might be termed non-utilization time with fire prevention and training programs implemented by Chief Riley. Mr. Hewitt indicated that they believe the budget increases experienced in the Fire Department are reasonable and reflect actual needs. He noted that the cost for fire service in Anaheim is presently comparable to that in other cities. The two major factors involved in increased costs are the geographical expansion of the City and work hour reductions resulting from labor negotia- tions and application of the Fair Labor Standards Act. With respect to their review of the Fire Department for potential savings, Mr. Hewitt explained that they believe any reduction in costs or savings in this department would have to be done with a conscientious decision on reduction of the service level to the citizens. Manpower staffing levels were reviewed and Mr. Hewitt related that the present department standard is a four- man company but this will be possible only approximately 30% of the time in the coming year. Be remarked that while there may be some potential savings in that the current response capability level is not necessarily for the majority of fires, no recommendation is made because a reduction would decrease the effectiveness of responsibility to major and life hazard fires, and constitute a reduction in the fire/rescue service level. An inventory is presently being conducted of the 24-hour work day in the department, and if it is proven feasible, there are plans to expand the Fire Inspection Program to private residences. Mr. Hewitt stated that because they found the department to be operating in an effective manner, the recommendations offered are few and many of these 75-754 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 1~ 1975~ 1:.30 P.M. are advisory observations of minor or potential problems. The one recommen- dation of substantial importance is that the department develop an apparatus replacement plan. At the present time there are five fire units which are seventeen or more years old and two which are fourteen years old. The standard life expectancy for fire apparatus is for twenty years, fifteen years first line service and 5 years reserve. Therefore, there is a definite need for ~he City of Anaheim and its fire service to develop an equipment replacement plan, preferably in five- year blocks, and the anticipated expenditures identifie~ and budgeted. The second recommendation of importance is that the department increase the training section by one man, preferably of the rank of Captain, inasmuch as they believe the present one-man training operation is not sufficient for an organization of this size. Mr. Hewitt stated t~at the remaining recommendations are more in the nature of organizational observation than they are in identification of deficiencies. He noted that thc department is currently operating on a one battalion system, which they do not feel is sufficient for a fire department of this size. However, they hesitate to make a recommendation that the department proceed to two battalions at this time because the present one battalion organization, although larger than usually encountered, is operating effectively. They would suggest this be considered in t~e near future. Mr. Hewitt concluded that the remainder of the Arthur Young & Company recommendations are confined to administrative communications and changes in the reporting system to provide for more meaninzful management information data and would be considered minor. Chief Riley commented that 1~ does support the Arthur Young & Company recommendations. He pointed out that several of these are items which the department had wanted to pursue in the past, and given a different financial climate, most likely would have accomplished these. The Chief indicated he was ready to implement the Arthur Young & Company recommendations as soon as the Council can make it feasible for the department to do so. Councilman Seymour congratulated Chief Riley for the outstanding leadership he has demonstrated in his department. He advised that he would expect, in accordance with the recommendations presented by Aruthur Young & Company, that recommendations for replacement of fire equipment wiii be presented at 1976-77 Budget deliberations and stated that he would be ready to support taese requests. Councilman Seymour advised that he would rely on the CRief's judgment as to when a second training officer anda two- battalion system are needed. Councilwoman Kaywood concurred with Councilman Seymour's comments and added her thanks to Chief Riley for exemplary leadership. Councilman Seymour moved to accept the Arthur Young & Company report on results of the management review of the Fire Department. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CAFdlIED. REPORT - RESULTS OF THE ~NAG~[ENT PRACTICES AUDIT - DISASTER SERVICES;. ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY: Mr. Hewitt submitted copies of the final report of the Arthur Young & Company review of Disaster Services to Council Members (copy on file in the of£ice o£ the City Clerk) and explained that the purpose o£ the study was to determine whether or not the division was providing disaster planning services to the City in an effective manner. The scope of the review included the present status of planning; current and past projects, as well as anticipated future projects. Mr. Hewitt reported that their findings indicated a moderate level of disaster planning and training being provided. This reduction in the planning level is partially attributed to problems within the office associated with illness of the director and moving. A great deal is also attributed to the City's actual commitment to the disaster planning effort. Mr. Hewitt explained that they do feel, at the conclusion of the review, that the program is worthy of continuation but at a reduced level of staffing. 75-755 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. They suggested deletion of the assistant to the Disaster Services Coordinator and Disaster Services Technician positions. The program merits continuation since it provides the City with eligibility for the surplus property program and also provides some level of training in Disaster Services. The department also provides the City Manager with additional staff for unusual occurrence activities, which are related to disaster services planning, at a reduced cost because of the 50% reimbursement from the Federal Government. Mr. Hewitt advised that the City Manager agrees with these recommendations and they have already been implemented, the two positions having been deleted from the program. Mr. Paul Hayes indicated agreement with the report and advised that they have either already carried out, or are in the process of implementing, the recommendations made by Arthur Young & Company. Councilman Seymour moved to accept the Arthur Young & Company report on the results of the management practices audit of the Disaster Services Office. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 73-74-36 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1130 (READVERTISED): Initiated by the City Flanning Commission, proposing deletion of condition requiring perpetual maintenance agreement in connection with Reclassification No. 73-74-36 and condition requiring a parkway maintenance assessment district in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 1130, on property located northwesterly of the corner of La Palma Avenue and Euclid Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-159, recommended to the City Council that Resolution No. 74R-235 adopted in connection with Reclassification No. 73-74-36 be amended to delete Condition No. 11 pertaining to a perpetual maintenance agreement. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-160 deleted Condition No. 6 of their Resolution No. PC69-173 adopted in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 1130, pertaining to establishment of a parkway maintenance assessment district. Miss Santahlati reported that the subject property includes both the proposed Anaheim Shores Planned Commlunity development (Reclassification No. 73-74-36) and the Martin Luther Hospital expansion program (Conditional Use Permit No. 1130). ~{iss Santahlati explained that the conditions were imposed at the time the zoning petitions were granted. In both instances, the City has, since the time of approval of these petitions, determined that Romneya Drive would be a secondary arterial highway. In view of the fact that it has been the City's policy to maintain such streets, including landscaping, the Director of Public Works, is, therefore, recommending removal of these conditions. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council relative to the proposed deletion of the conditions. Mr. Ben Bay, 2148 West Grayson Avenue, Anaheim, questioned, if the City had changed the designation of Romneya Drive to a secondary arterial highway, why a new traffic study was not conducted by the City and why Environmental Impact Report No. 113, submitted by Matreyek Homes, was not amended to reflect this. He stated that if there has been a change in traffic projections significant enough to release the developers from the perpetual maintenance agreement, he would think that the traffic projections would have changed considerably as compared to those described in the original Environmental Impact Report. He inquired whether there had been a new study, and if so, why isn't this reflected in an amendment to Environmental Impact Report No. 113. Mr. Thompson replied that he would prefer to respond to Mr. Bay following review of the written record and Environmental Impact Report. Mr. Bay requested that any additional traffic study undertaken at this time also include review of the impact projected for Coronet and Falmouth Avenues. 75-756 City hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MIi~UTES - August 19~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebiey, the City Council continued the public hearing on deletion of conditions relating to perpetual maintenance agreement and parkway maintenance assessment district in connection with Reclassification No. 73-74-36 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1130 to September 2, 1975, pending preparation of written response to Mr. Bay's inquiries. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE COUNTY MANPOWER CO~.~ISSION - AGREEMEnt: (Expenditure of CETA funds) Mr. William Hepburn reported on the three contracts proposed with the Orange County Manpower Commission which would authorize the expenditure of CETA funds as follows: 1. Contract No. H81320 - Title I: A multipurpose contract in the amount of $126,000 for the period of July 1, 1975 through June 30, 1976 which provides $25,000 in Manpower Planner funding and $101,000 to support a Manpower Services Center. 2. Contract No. H82301 - Title II: A contract which provides for a Public Service Employment Program in the amount of $374,465 for the period July 1, 1975 through June 30, 1976 to maintain 45 positions. 3. Contract No. H~6301 - Title VI: A contract to support the Work Experience Program in the amount of $2,431,314 for the period from January 10, 1975 through June 30, 1976 to maintain 96 positions from January 1975 to June 30, 1975 and 206 positions from July 1, 1975 through June 30, 1976. Mr. Hepburn advised that the procedure has changed this year so that in lieu of individual contracts for each program, one agreement will be entered into with the Orange County Manpower Commission, which will be amended as necessary to reflect increases in dollar amounts or to show additional programs. Councilwoman Kaywood inquired whether the term "Clinical Training Project" as shown on page 6 of the CETA VI Contract was correct and this was subsequently changed to read "Clerical Training Project". Councilman Seymour questioned the statement shown on the contract in reference to the 10% limitation on administrative costs and noted that while the Title II Budget is within this framework, the Title VI administrative budget would appear to exceed that percentage. Mr. Hepburn explained that these agreements are printed on a form provided by the Manpower Commission which has this statement printed on it. Statutory limitation for Title VI - Contract Administration - is 20% and the figure proposed in the budget would amount to approximately 17% of the cost. Councilman Seymour suggested that if this statement relative to a 10% administrative ceiling is incorrect, that it be removed from the Title VI contract forms so as to avoid any confusion when they are submitted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-439: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-439 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CERTAIN AGREE~iENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF A~kHEIM AND THE ORANGE COUrt'fY MANPOWER CO~fl{ISSION RELATING TO MANPOWER PROGRAMS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENTS AN=D MODIFICATIONS THERETO ON BEIiALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL M~4BERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL M~iBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-439 duly passed and adopted. In connection with the additional Title VI Grant for Work Experience Programs, the Personnel Director advised that applications for these positions would be accepted beginning September 2, 1975. City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19~ 1975~ 1:30 ~.M. REqUE~? FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION - PERSONNEL MATTER: At the request of the Personnel Director, the City Council, by general consent, determined they would meet in executive session on Wednesday, August 27, 1975 at 3:00 p.m. ACQUISITION OF PARK PROPERTY ADJACENT TO TRACT NO. 7787: Mr. Alan Watts reported on negotiations conducted at the direction of the City Council for acquisition of approximately 11 acres of property for park purposes, subject property being located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Imperial Highway and adjacent to Tract No. 7787. (The acquisition of %his property was directly involved with an additional access point provided onto Santa Aha Canyon Road from Tract No. 7787 and its acquisition and street alignments were discussed in connection therewith, see Council Minutes of January 14~ 1975, pages 75-36 through 75-35,) Mr. Watts advised that the purchase of this property would involve the payment of approximately $215,000 to each of two property owners for parcels which are both slightly in excess of five and one-half acres each. The property would be acquired through an agreement which would utilize the park in lieu fees as a special fund committed to this acquisition for a period of six years at an interest rate of 6~. Mr. Watts reported that both owners had been operating poultry ranches and one has terminated his business. The otRer property owner, on tile easterly parcel which is adjacent to a residential tract, wishes to continue to conduct that operation to the end of the current year and then phase it out. Therefore a lease agreement is proposed with this property owner (Clark) permitting such use of the property. Councilwoman Kaywood noted that there have been complaints of fly infestation in connection with the poultry ranch and inquired whether there would be any way to require that this be rectified. Mr. Watts advised that one of the attorneys in his office has been working on the fly control problem with the Orange County Mosquito Abatement Oistrict. Further, he noted that the lease agreement proposed provides the City with the right to enter the property for inspection. Councilman Seymour noted the lease agreement indicates the rental of $100 per month, and stated that although he assumed someone determined this to be a reasonable rental, it would appear to him to be extremely iow for five acres. Councilman Seymour questioned what geographic boundaries are delineated from Which the in lieu fees will be committed to this promissory note, and Mr. Watts replied that no geographical limitations were set up insofar as the agreement was concerned; that all in lieu fees would be placed in the fund and applied to reduce this note. He added that if in lieu fees to be utilized for this purpose were limited as to the area it came from, it is possible there would be insufficient security in the fund to persuade the property owners to enter into the agreement. Councilman Seymour stated that the special fund from a specific geographic location for park needs was set forth in an Arthui Young & Company recommendation, and this was the first opportunity to utilize this concept. He indicated that although he would have preferred that the Arthur Young & Company recommendation be adhered to with respect to the establistunent of a separate park in lieu fund account, in the interest of time and expediency, he would offer the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-440: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-440 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ~N AGREEMENT WITH JAMES .G. WILDER TO PURCHASE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE I~%YOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEME~T. Roll Call Vote: 75-758 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Au~u.~t 19~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES; COUNCIL M~BERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-440 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-441: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 75R-441 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEME~f WITt~ DOROTHY A. CLARK TO PURCHASE CERTAI,'~ REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL M~iBERS: Ka~ood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL M~2'tBERS; None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-441 d~,ly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-442: Mr. Watts reported that it would be appropriate to insert in the blank on the second page of the proposed lease agreement the term "twentieth (20th) day" and on lines eleven (11) and twelve (12) to insert "twentieth (20th) day of August" so that the payment period would commence on August 20, 1975. Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-442 with the insertions as recommended by the City Attorney: Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREE~EN~f WITt~ DOROTHY A. CLARK TO LEASE C~RTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL biEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL M~MBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-442 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-443: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-443 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRA~NT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Wilder - park site) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL M~{BERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL Mk~MBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-443 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-444: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 75R-444 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. City Hall~ Anahelm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19~ 1975~ 1;30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRA~ DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANfd{EIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES. (Clark - park site) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL M~MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES; COUNCIL M~ERS; None ABSENT: COUNCIL M~4BERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-444 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-445 - WORK ORDER NO. 847: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 75R-445 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLy ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AWO THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, ~TERIALS A~ND EQUIPi{Eh~ AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AI~ COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT; FIRE STATION NO. 5 ADDITION TO APPARATUS ROOM, 1154 NORTH KRAEMER AVEI~E, IN TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 847. (James P. Reid) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL ~MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL M~fBERS: None ABSEi~: COUNCIL M~MBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-445 duly passed and adopted. TRACT NO. 8775 - STORM DRAIN FACILITIES: The City Engineer presented a recommended agreement to be entered into by Matreyek Homes, Inc., Orange County Flood Control District and the City to provide for the installation of storm drain facilities from Tract No. 8775 to the Houston Storm Channel. Councilman Seymour questioned whether this agreement for improvement of an underground drainage system is intended to facilitate drainage for the entire Matreyek Homes, Inc. project or for just a portion of it. Mr. Maddox responded that this particular agreement provides for recon- struction of the Orange County Flood Control District storm channel and does not involve on-site drainage. On-site drainage facilities planned for this project will include a retention basin and an underground system which would flow into the reconstructed storm channel. The capacity of the basin is based on the total drainage requirement of the Matreyek Homes, Inc. project, as well as the Martin Luther Hospital, and drainage from both would flow into the Houston Storm Channel. In response to Councilman Seymour~s concern, Mr. Maddox assured Council members that approval of this particular Resolution would not be considered as satisfying the drainage requirement of the developer as set forth in the approval of the tentative tract map. Mr. Ben Bay, 2148 West Grayson Avenue, Anaheim was recognized by the Mayor. He advised that he is pleased to hear that improvements will be made to the Houston Storm Channel to accommodate the drainage from the Matreyek Homes project. He questioned the fact that the current drainage plan presented by this developer to the City Engineering Department shows only one-half to two- thirds of the drainage area directed toward an underground pipe system and that as the plan stands now, all of the property to the west of the proposed lake will drain across the surface and through the single-family residential development immediately to the west, ultimately draining to tile Houston Storm Channel under the Riverside Freeway at Brookhurst Street. Be stressed that this is his prime concern and the reason that he is questioning the planning which will occur between the developer and Orange County Flood Control District. If the developer intends to enlarge and improve Houston Storm 75-760 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19.; 1975; 1:30 P.M. Channel to sufficient capability to accommodate all the drainage from this project, then Mr. Bay indicated he is in 100% agreement, however, if they are going to plan this channel improvement with the storm facilities currently described in their drainage plan, Mr. Bay contended this would not accommodate a two-year storm level and would require that run-off water drain through the residential tract to the immediate west which already has a drainage problem. Mr. Maddox stated that to his knowledge no drainage plan has been sub- mitred by the developer and from his conversation with Mr. Jim Chrlste~sen of Matreyek Homes, Inc., his understanding is that all of the drainage from the development will ultimately go into the Houston Storm Channel. Mr. Bay advised that a tentative drainage plan has been on file with the City for one and one-half years, which has not yet been approved. On this tentative plan no underground drainage system is show~ on tile western side of the project which, in his opinion, would result in approximately One-third of the drainage water running through the western residential tract to Brookhurst Street. ?ir. Maddox responded that Matreyek Homes, Inc. has not submitted a final plan for drainage inasmuch as they are not yet sure how the project would proceed because of some changes in the total concept. He added that it would be unusual to submit a drainage plan until the final development plan is determined. During Council discussion, Council Members Thom and Seymour both felt it would be beneficial if Mr. Bay would monitor the drainage plans as they proceed, and that further discussion would not be productive until such final plans are submitted and there is something specific to review. Mr. Maddox advised that the drainage plans are documents of public record and that he would advise Mr. Bay when these were received in order to assist him in monitoring their progress. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-446: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 75R-446 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANJdIEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONOITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN MATREYEK HOMES, INC., THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PROVIDING FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STORM DRAIN FACILITIES FROM TRACT 8775 TO THE HOUSTON STO~'! CHANNEL, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL M~BERS: None ABSEIff: COUNCIL M~BERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-446 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-447 - AGREEMENT - PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO~ANY: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 75R-447 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS OF AN AGRE~iENT WITH PACIFIC TELEPHONE A}~ TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH THE OVERBUILD OF JOINTLY OWNED FACILITIES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGRE~E~ (66k~ CIRCUIT FROM SHARP TO ~%NNUM SUBSTATIONS). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL ldEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-447 duly passed and adopted. 7~-76! City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19, 1975, 1:30 P.M. Councilman Sneegas left the Council Chamber. (3:45 p.m.) SALE OF CERTAIN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES TO ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL~ AUTONETICS OIVISION; In connection with the recommended sale, Councilman Seymour asked what type of depreciation schedule was used on these items. Electrical Superintendent Edwards replied that Federal Power Commission depreciation tables were used for this equipment and each element was calculated at its own rate. Councilman Seymour inquired whether Mr. Edwards, in his professional opinion, felt this was a realistic rate of depreciation for these items and that they are being offered at a fair market value, to which Mr. Edwards replied affirmatively. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-448: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution 75R-448 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TgRM8 OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL Il: CO~ECTION WITH THE SALE AND REARRANGEMENT OF CERTAIN ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION FACILITIL$ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEbfE~. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour, Pebley, Kaywood and Thom NOES: COUNCIL M~BERS: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-448 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Sneegas returned to Council Chamber. (3:50 p.m.) RANCHO YORBA HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION PROTEST - UTILITY POLES: Protest submitted by Dr. Vernon L. Armstrong on behalf of the Rancho Yorba Homeowner'.s Association relative to the proposed overhead installation of utility poles and wires along Imperial Highway, continued from the meetings of July 22, July 29, and August 5, 1975, was further continued to September 2, 1975, by general Council consent. SOUND ATTENUATION IN RESIDgNTIAL PROJECTS; On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the recommendation of the City Planning Commission pertaining to Sound Attenuation in Residential Projects, which was continued to this date from the meeting of July 29, 1975, was further continued to the meeting of September 9, 1975 to allow for receipt of anticipated comments from the Orange County Health Department. MOTION CARRIED. Z'BERG LITTERABATEMENTLEGISLATION (AB 2353~:. Mr. Watts presented a brief analysis of AB 2353, the Z'berg Litter Abatement Bill, as was requested by the City Council at the meeting of August 12, 1975. He recalled that the last time the Council discussed this subject, their principal question was whether or not it would be possible to support the anti-littering provisions of the bill without supporting the revenue generating portions whereby a 1.5 percent tax would be levied on manufacturers and importers on certain items. Mr. Watts advised that their conclusion, following review of the proposed legislation, was the State would have to fund by some means, either taxes or other State revenue sources, the anti-littering provisions proposed in AB 2353. Mayor Thom related that while he supports the philosophical intent of the legislation, he could not support the taxing authority proposed. Councilwoman Kaywood voiced the opinion that government should take some steps to eliminate the litter problem. She related that currently a phenomenal amount of money is spent on litter clean up and she felt this legislation would more fairly tax the sources of litter and provide for its clean up. She also was of the opinion that the passage of this legislation would encourage the development and use of anti-litter containers. 75-762 City liall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. Councilwoman Kaywood moved that the City Council support AB 2353. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. To this motion, Council Members Seymour, Cebley and Sneegas voted "no". The Mayor declared that the motion failed to carry. CONSEi~T CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda: 1. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to the City's insurance carrier: a. Claim submitted by Marian D. Eyre on behalf of Gregory Scott Eyre, a r~inor, for mental anguish and distress purportedly sustained as a result of actions by Anaheim Police Officers on or about June 3, 1975. b. Claim submitted by Wayne Owens for damage purportedly sustained to clothing as result of burr on chair while attending a convention at the Anaheim Convention Center on or about July 23, 1975. c. Claim submitted by Mrs. John D. Bowler for injury purportedly sustained by her son as a result of playin5 ball without proper equipment at Anaheim Fark, Recreation and Arts softball tournament on or about August 5, 1075. 2. ENTERTAII~NT AY~D ;2tUSE~NT DEVICES PEi~iITS: The following permits were granted subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police: a. Entertainment Permafit for a four piece Country-Western Group at the Flowing Well, 405 South brookhurst Street, Thursday through Saturday, 9:00 p.m. to 1:30 a.m. (Frank N. Radcliff, II, Applicant) b. Amusement Devices Permit for twenty (20) assorted amusement device ~mchines to be installed at Pinball Palace, 2761 West Lincoln Avenue. (John P. Duerner, Applicant) 3. COPdtESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed: a. Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County - Minutes - July 23, 1975. SERY~O AVE~E STREET Ii~ROVE?~NT~ WOIiK Oi~ER NO. 729-B - CIh~GE ORDER NO. 1: Contract Change Order I~o.~ 1 in the anDunt of $7,221.30 was approved, increasing the total contract price to $155,924.75. MOTION CARRIED. RIO VISTA PARK I~ROVE~NT~ WORK ORDER NO. 851 - SUBSTITUTION OF SUBCONTRACTOR: The Deputy City Clerk reported that the City Engineer reco~mnends substitution of George Angevine of Whittier for C. W. White of Garden Grove, as masonry sub- contractor on the Rio Vista Park Improvement, Work Order No. 851, as requested by the prime contractor, Jacco Construction Company. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council authorized the substitution of George Angevine as masonry subcontractor, as recommended by the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NOS. 75R-449 THROUGII 75R-451: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nos. 75R-449 through 75R-451, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with the reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-449 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: A RESOLUTION OF Ti-~ CITY COUNCIL OF TltE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIi~ DEEDS ~D ORDERING Ti~IR RECORDATION. (Clarence L. Conzelman, et al.; Robert Lee Haitbrink, et ux.; Albert R. Bradley, et ux.; Albert R. Bradley, et ux.) 75-763 City tball~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19m 1975m 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-450 - FINAL ACCEPTAg~CE WOI~ ORDER NO. 729-B: A RESOLUTIO;~ OF TILE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ;H-~At[EI!! FIi~ALLY ACCEl)TING TdE COI~?LETION Ai~D Tile ~]JRi~ISHING OF ALL PLA~,~T, LABOR, SERVICES, ~IATERIALS Ai~D EQUIPMENT ;u~O ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FJEL Ai]D WATER, A/i~D THE PERFOR}~CE OF ALL WORI~ UECESSARY TO COiqSTIlUCT A~D CO~,fPLETE Tile FOLLOWING I'UBLIC I~ROVEi'rE, NT, TO WIT: TiLE I~.~ROVEi,~ENT OF SERIL~NO AVEi'~UE, W/O IIIDDEN C.~4YON ROAD TO CANYON RIH ROAD, IN TIlE CITY OF ANAi{EIM, UORK ORDER NO. 729-B, A.1t.F.P. NO. 735. (R. J. Noble Company) I~ESOLUTION NO. 75i{-451 - PROPOSED AB.~,~DON~,IENT NO. 75-3A: A RESOLUTION OF T~iE CITY COUNCIL OF TIiE CITY OF ANA, iEI~{ DEC~.ARING ITS INT~i~TION TO VACATE ~D ABle'DON CERTAIN REAL ~,~.:-~ ~.~:1 FIXINC A DATE FOR I~ARING TI~ON. (75-3A; September 9, 1975~ 2:30 p.m.; Lots A~ B and C~ Tract No. 3825~ north of Wagner Street east of Sunkist Street) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL ~iIBE!IS: l.(aywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES; COUNCIL ABSENT: COUNCIL ~}~ERS: None The 5~yor declared Resolution Nos. 75R-449 through 75R-451~ bosh inclu- sive, duly passed and adopted. ORAJGL COUNTY tiEALTiI FLAi~NIHG COUNCIL - PRESENTATION OF REFERENCE HATERIAL: i.{r. Bill Daly, Anaheim representative to the Orange County Health Planning Council, presented a number of inforpmtional booklets which had been published by the Council relative to the health care field. Mr. Daly thanked the City Council for his reappointment as Anaheim's representative to the llealth Planning Council and for their endorsement of same. lie pointed out that the broad scope and professional nature of the reference materials prepared by the Orange County Health Planning Council are indicative of the caliber of that organization. The Council thanked :~. Daly for his presentation and requested these materials be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. DOUBLE CilECK RETREAT - SOLICITATION PE~IT: Request of Mr. Vincent Bo Dailey, Double Check Retreat, Post Office Box 639, l{emet, California 92343, for permission to solicit charitable funds in the City of Anaheim was submitted for Council consideration together with reports from the City Attorney's Office, License Division and Police Department. On motion by Councilman Se~aour, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, City Council granted Oouble Check Retreat permission to solicit charitable funds for a period of sixty (60) days effective August 19, 1975 and expiring October 18, 1975, in accordance with Chapter 7.32 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. MOTION CARRIED. VARI~CE NO. 2693 - REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CODE SECTIONS; Request of Hervyn Phelan, Anaheim Plaza Building Ltd., for waiver of Sections 4.08.020 and 4.08.070 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to a "changing copy" electric sign to be located at 505 North Euclid Street (granted under Variance No. 2693 for on-site advertising) was submitted for Council consideration, together with a report from Development Services Department. Hr. Thompson pointed out that this request involved a policy decision by the City Council. He advised that signs such as this which can be viewed from a highway, roadway or freeway would fall into the classification of billboards and as such would not be permitted. To permit a sign of this nature, the Council would have to amend certain sections of the Code. He noted that the State does control billboards within 600 feet of the freeway. Councilwoman Kaywood inquired whether this proposed sign would be a distraction to motorists on the freeway, and Mr. ~ddox replied that a communication has been addressed to CalTrans advising them o'f this proposal and that, while no written reply has been received as yet, he has been informed verbally they have no comment. 75-764 City ~iall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19, 1975~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. iJalter Brooks, 3307 Benton Way, Santa Ana, QRS Electrical Advertising, representing the applicant, emphasized that t~e State does not consider the type of message unit which they propose to install, a billboard, tie related that although they were granted the variance for on-site advertising purposes, the economics of installation of this si~{n would not make it feasible to use it strictly for on-site advertising. He noted that the merchants in Anaheim Plaza are interested in utilizing the si~n. fir. Brooks su~aarizcd that their problems arise from the fact that the State does not consider this type of sign a billboard, whereas under the Anahei~a b~nicipal Code, it would be so construed, and therefore he is seeking relief. Councilwoman tlaywood left the Council Chamber. (4:05 p.m.) In response to Councilr~mn Pebley, Mr. Brooks elaborated on the type of sign proposed, which would be an electronically controlled message center which uses indirectly lighted luminescent discs, ~ich can be programmed to either run a message or flash it. He advised that these units are very expensive and generally used only in metropolitan areas, lie felt it would be an enhancement to the community and advised that they do plan to relay public service messages as well. Councilwoman Kaywood returned to the Council Charaber. (4:10 p.m.) Plans from the variance file and pictures of the proposed sign were reviewed at Council table. Councilman Seymour noted that six to nine months ago when he was first asked his opinion of the City Planning Conunission's potential reaction to this sign proposal, he was assured that it was intended for on-site advertising only. iie indicated concern that now, subsequent to City Planning Commission approval of the variance for on-site advertising only, the applicant is requesting permission to advertise other products and businesses in the community, ile asked if the City Planning Con,mission was aware of the applicant's intent when the variance was considered by them. i~. Thompson stated that the Planning Conm~ission was agreeable to tenants of t~e Anaheim Plaza Building using the sign, but less than enthusiastic about its use for off-site advertising. b[r. Brooks contended that almost no discussion of off-site advertising was held at the Planning Commission level because of the wording in the Anaheim i~nicipal Code which places this sign in the billboard category. He was informed that the Planning Commission could not amend the Code or grant the requested waiver and, therefore, has submitted his request to the City Council. Councilman Pebley stated that he favored the idea of the message center and cor~ented that it would appear imperative that the owner display off-site advertising because of the cost. Councilnmn Seymour stated that he is not opposed to the applicant deriving profits from the message center and further stated that he would be agreeable to helping the Anaheim Plaza merchants and the Anaheim Plaza Buildin$, however~ he felt that if the Council approved the message unit as it is now defined, contrary to the way it was approved by the Planning Commission, it would establish a precedent for future such requests which might not be actual ~:~essage centers but could be interpreted as flashing or lighted signs, etc. ~lr. Brooks contended that there would not be a proliferation of requests for this type of sign since the minimum cost for same would be $60,000, and there are only two locations in Orange County which would be suitable for this type of sion. ~lr. Watts explained the two methods which Council could employ to permit the applicant to utilize the sign for off-site advertising, define this type of sign as not being included in the description within Title 4 as a billboard or pemnit off-site items to be advertised upon these types of structures. Councilwoman llaywood left the Council Chamber. (4:25 p.m.) 7~-765 .City l{all~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL ~-{Ii{UTES - August 19; 1975; 1;37 P.II. Councilman Pebley reiterated that he thought tile idea has merit, tiler it would be a real asset to the Anaheim Plaza Shopping Center and to any other merchant in Anaheim who would use it. Councilman Seymour observed that his and Councilman Pebley'$ philosophy on st.~nxn~ differ, that although he (Councilman Seymour) would like to assist the shopping center merchants, he felt the Council should adhere to the sign ordinance. Councilman Thom moved that the request for waiver of Sections 4.08.020 and 4.0'-3.070 of the Anaheim .~!unicipal Code in connection with a "changing copy" sign to be located at 505 ~orth Euclid Street be denied. Councilman Seymo~r seconded the motion. To this notion Council :iembers Pebley and Sneegas voted "no". Councilwoman Kaywood absent. The ~{ayor declared that the motion failed to carry. PZlOPOSAL TO REPLACE PA~[ Lf6~D - A~Ai]'2I]-i HILLS~ I!!C.: Proposal submitted by Anaheim Hills for replacement of ten acres of park land relinquished by the City for school and library purposes at the northeast corner of Imperial Highway and Nohl F~nch Road, was presented together with communication and exhibit "A" from Jack ~i. Sickler, President, Anaheim Hills, Inc. dated August 15, 1975, which indicated that an additional four-acre park site located on the south side of Nohl Ranch Road, directly across from the Oak Knoll Townhomes would also be dedicated for park purposes. This brings the total amount of acreage proposed for substitution to 15.5 acres. b~. John Millick, Vice President, Anaheim Hills, Inc. related that they have been working with City staff to provide an acceptable substitution for the ten acres to be used for school and library purposes. Although one singular ten acre parcel could not be located, they have identified property in three different locations which they feel would be acceptable. Councilwoman Kaywood returned to the Council Chamber (4:35 p.m.) Mr. :[illick described the proposed substitute park sites as follows: a. Two parcels located north of Canyon Rim Road and southof Mohler Drive, consisting of 6.5 acres. This park land is adjacent to the open space ~lich was established by agreement with the County of Orange. These parcels are developable and would lend themselves to use as a small neighbor- hood park with some improvement. Such a neighborhood parl~ would serve the Westfield Development, the Broad,moor Homes and any future homes on Canyon Rim ~oad. b. A 4.99 acre parcel located south of the base of the Walnut Canyon Dam, which is completely surrounded by the existing Oak Canyon Nature Park. It is one of the key vista spots in the canyon and would provide an added amenity to the park. The parcel also contains a stand of over 100 natural oak trees in its canyon portion. c. A. 4.0 acre parcel located south of ~ohl Ranch Road, directly across from the Oak i~oll Townhomes. The majority of this property is level and, in fact, Anaheim Hills, Inc. has been operating this as a private public park, i.e., providing picnic tables and trash storage and collection. This parcel also has a stand of oak trees and is well-used currently. ik. John ~lardzno advised Council that he had reviewed these proposed substitute park sites, as well as the Park, Recreation and the Arts Department staff, and it has been detemnined that they would fit into the present park program. i{r. Owen Drown, 6694 Pasco del Norte, Anaheim, was recognized by the ~yor and advised that his home backs up to one of these proposed substitute park sites, lie stated that he would very much like to see such site utilized for a park, however, he wished to bring to Council's attention one potential problem. lie explained that one possible accessway into this park would be through an easement located between his home and that of his immediate neighbor. He stated that the residents living at the end of the cul-de-sac would not be in favor of the City's use of the easement for park access since they feel it would create a parking proble~.t and the foot traffic between the homes would not be acceptable. 75-766 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Harding stated that this easment has already been the subject of discussion between the City and Broadmoor Homes. It appears, from preliminary investigation, that the City can abandon that easement inammuch as there is other access to the proposed park. >Ir. Watts counseled that the original parcel at the northeast corner of Imperial Itighway and Nohl Ranch Road, for which these three parcels are proposed in substitution thereof, was acquired through an agreement between the City and Anaheim Hills, and if the City Council is agreeable to accepting the substitutions, this could be accomplished n~st expeditiously by amending the original agreement and modifying the exhibit contained therein to reflect the park land to be dedicated and to show conveyance of these particular parcels. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council directed the City Attorney's Office to prepare an amendment to the agreement with Anaheim Hills, Inc./Texaco Ventures, Inc., authorized pursuant to Resolution No. 72R-455, to show acceptance by the City of the substitute parcels of land amounting to 15.5 acres as shown on Exhibit "A". MOTIOi'~ C~X~.~I~D. YGAD CLUB - WAIVER OF PARADE FEE: Mr. Steve Tsubota of the Cerritos Chapter, YGAD Club, was recognized by the Mayor and related to Council the problems he has had in attempting to obtain proper permits for the YGAD Club to push a bath tub a total of twelve miles, only a portion of which would be within the City of Anaheim. He advised that they requested waiver of the $25.00 fee and a sixty-day application period, which was denied by the City Council at the meeting of August 20, 1975. He stated that funds in their club treasury are low, and this event is being conducted to raise charitable funds which will be split evenly, 50% going to the YGAD Club and 50% to the Lung Association. In response to Council questions ~r. Tsubota indicated that they have sub~itted a copy of the modified route, which will not go to Disneyland Park but to the Disneyland Hotel parking lot and that they are willing to stop at the edge of the parking lot or at a nearby service station if it is necessary. ~.~. Richard Loya, Health Education teacher at Huntington Park High School stated that he is the YGAD Club's advisor, and that he has offered to pay tl~e ~25.00 pernit fee. It was stressed that the problem is iz,~mediate, inasmuch as the event is scheduled to take place tomorrow and they are connnitted to this date because of arrangements nmde with the three other cities involved and press coverage. Councilman Pebley suggested that part of the problem encountered is due to the fact that the students had not contacted the Police Department for this permit as required, since the Chief of Police is the City Official who issues these. ~..tr. l~'atts, in reviewing the Ordinance indicated that it clearly spells out the procedure to obtain a parade per,nit, however, he could find no reference to the sixty-day application period, from which the YGPu) Group is requesting a wa iv e r. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Sneegas moved that the $25.00 parade permit fee be waived in connection with the YGAD Club Bath Tub Push-A-Thon to be conducted August 20, 1975, and that the Club make necessary arrangements with the Police Department to ensure the safety of all concerned. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTIOII CARRIED. At the suggestion of Council and the City Attorney, the YGf~ Club's repre- sentatives were dispatched to Lt. A1 Rogers of the Anaheim Police Department Traffic Bureau since time was of the essence. Councilman Sneegas commented that he had originally felt the amended ordinance relating to parades and parade permits to be too far reaching and is still opposed to it because of the types of problems encountered by the YG~LD Club. 75-767 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 19z 1975,~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NOS. 75R-452 Ai~D 75R-453 - AWARD OF CONTRACT WORK ORDER NOS. 749-B AND 855: In accordance with the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution Nos. 75R-452 and 75R-453 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-452 - WORii OILDER 749-B: A RESOLUTION OF TiLE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL A~D AWAROING A COi;TRACT TO THE LOLq~ST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FO~ THE FUI~IStiING OF ALL PL~2~T, LABOR, SERVICES, I~biTERIALS AND EQUIPMENT Ai~D ALL UTILITIES AND TRAi,~SPORTATION, INCLUDING POIC£R, FUEL AND WATER, ;2~l) PERFOPC{ING ALL WOl~i NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COI,~LETE ThE FOLLOWING PUBLIC Ii~PROVE?~NT: INSTALLATION OF TI~kFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGt{TING AT TitE INTERSECTION OF LAiiEVIEW AVENUE AND OILAi.~GETHOFdFE AVENUE, iH Ti~E CITY OF ANBJ{EIM, WOt~ ORDER ?.~0. 749-B. (Steiny and Company, Inc. $35,426.00) ~ ~ ~ r T T~ ~ ~ I~]SOLUTION NO. 75R-453 - UOilll ORDER 855~ A R~..oO.~JTIO.~ OF T~ CITy COUNCIL OF Ti-iE CITY OF ~4AIiEIi[ ACCEFTIi~G A 8]iz~i;O Pi%OFOSAL ~D AWAi~)IiIG A CONTACT TO LO%~ST RESPONSIBLE EIDDEi% FO2 l~J2.~Ig~lll.!G OF ALL PL,U~T, LA, Oil, SERVICES~ I.~TEi%IALS ~.~ EQUIPI'~NT AND ALL UTILITIES ANO Ti~NSPORTATION,. Ii~CLUDIi~G PO~.~R, FUEL ~]D WATER, ~4D PE~OtLqlNG ALL WOPGI NECESSARY TO CONST~CT ~D COMPLETE TIlE FOLLOWING PUBLIC I~ROVEI.ff]NT: LA PA~,~ AVENUE DIA%INAGE I}.'~ROVEi,~NT, 180' E/O BLUE GUi-I STREET TO RIVERSIDE FREEWAY~ IN THE CITY OF ~II.~ WORK OilER 855. (Poulsom-Crowley Company - $3,777.00) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUHCIL iiE~[~EKS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom UOES: COUNCIL ~]~'~BE'~{S: i~one ABSENT: COUNCIL i'.H~iiiERS: None The Hayor declared Resolution i~os. 75R-452 and 75R-453 duly passed and adopted. PUKCiiASE OF EqUIPI.~NT - SEVEi.~ (7) llOTO?%CYCLES: The interim Assistant City !~ana~er reported upon the recon~nended purchase of seven motorcycles for the Police Department and advised that the one supplier, Ilarley-Davidson of Fullerton, has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of $24,493.42 including tax. He thereupon recor, nnended the purchase be authorized and advised that these are budgeted replacement vehicles. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, purchase was authorized in the amount of $24,493.42 as recommended by the City I.~nager's Office. :-~TION CARRIED. ORDINanCE NO. 3457: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3457 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ~AHEI~iA~.~NDIi~G TITLE 18 OF THE ~AiiEI~{MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONIi~G. (74-75-37 - RS-7200) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL ME~LBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL i~Ei~LBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL liE~tBERS: None The ~yor declared Ordinance No. 3457 duly passed and adopted. OI~IN~CE NO. 3458: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3458 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF A~A/iEIM AgiENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-47 (11) - bfL) ORDINA~CE NO. 3459: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3459 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF Ai~AHEIM AS.~NDING TITLE 18 OF TIlE ANA/tEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-9 (3) - CL) 75-768 Cit7 lfall; .Anaheim; California - COUi~CIL MIiIUTES -Ausust 19; 1975; 1;30 P.M. Ot;OI.~CE NO. 3460: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3460 for first read lng. ~ ORDINAi~CE OF TtIE CITY OF AiIAi~EIH FIXING A24D LEVYING A PROPERTY TAX Oi~ ALL PROPERTY WITIIIN THE CORPOR~TE LI~IITS OF THE CITY OF ;d~A~fi~IH FOR TIlE FISCAL YEAR 1975-76. ($1.05 per $100 assessed valuation) CO?[PLAINT ~ND PETITION REGARDING DUi.~IiIG ACTIVITIES: (South of Nohl Ranch Road, east of Spyglass Way) Councilman Seymour introduced ~Ir. Steve Severy, 543~ Spyglass Way, Anaheim, and advised ~'~. Severy has had a problem relating to du~]ping of rubbish and lack of weed abatement on property adjacent to his home which is owned by the Grant Corporation of California. Councilman Seymour described the attempts made by ~k. Severy and himself ti]rough telephone contact with the City of Anaheim, Anaheim Hills Inc., and the Grant Corporation, to correct the situation, all of which were futile. There- fore, he suggested that ~. Severy attend a Council meeting and request the aid of ti~e City Council. :Ir. Severy presented a petition signed by homeox~mers in the immediate vicinity of the problem area, requesting that the City of Anaheim prevail upon the Grant Corporation of California to refrain from using the subject area for du~xping and to discourage others from using that land for dumpinS purposes by blochin~ the access road and posting the area. The homeo~,mers further requested that existing refuse and equipment be reraoved and chat the slope banks bordering the area be nmintained to the same degree as is required of the l~o~eo~.~ers for slopes belonging to them. fir. Severy presented several photourap}~s of the offensive area which were reviewed by Council Members. lle pointed out that there are abandoned con- struction vehicles, rubbish and weeds. Mr. Severy indicated that since the Grant Corporation has provided a paved access road into the subject area and has utilized this property for dumpin~ of their own refuse, o~her homeowners i~ave also used the property for dumping. The area now constitutes an eyesore, as well as a fire hazard. Councilman Seymour apologized to fir. Severy for ghe inconvenience of zno to attend the City Council meeting to rectify a situation which should rightly have been handled pursuant to one of his many telephone calls several months ago. He stated that he is prepared to take whatever legal action is necessary to correct the situation. The City Attorney advised that the problem is two-fold, the weeds being in violation of the City's weed abatement regulations and the dumping constituting a public nuisance. Councilman Seymour thereupon ~mved that the City Attorney be directed to take legal action against the owner of property located south of Nohl Ranch Road, east of Spyglass Way to enforce weed abatement regulations, to dis- continue use of the property as a dumping site and to restore the area to its natural state. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. The photographs submitted by bir. Severy were retained in the custody of the City Attorney. APPOI~T~NTS - RIDING AND HIKING TF~ILS SUBCOmmITTEE: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwor. mn Kaywood, the following delegates and alternates were appointed to the Riding and Hiking Trails Subcommittee of the Canyon ~'~rea General Planning Task Force: I. Hrs. Louis L. Curtis, 777 Peralta Hills Drive (Alternate Mrs. Richard Cramer, 601Peralta Hills Drive). 2. ~iiss Carla Kleist, 4038 b~ple Tree Drive (Alternate Mr. Bill McKay~ 5251Gatewood Lane). 3. ~. William Fritz, 540q Willowick Circle (Alternate Mrs. Grace Fritz, 54,)9 Willowick Circle) 4. i~s. Dione Hesketh, 1126 Timken Road (Alternate Hs. Linda Bedford, 1141 Country ]{ill Road). 5. lit. ilorst Schor, 380 Anaheim Hills Road (Alternate Mr. Bill Lusk, P.O. Box 2140, Newport Beach, California). 75-769 City HallI Anaheim;. California - COUI~CIL MINUTES - August 191 1975! 1:30 P.M. 6. Alternate l[e~-~ber, firs. Jean Morris, 400 Torrey Pines Circle~ Anaheim. HOTION CARRIED. Ai'POINT}.~NT - CA~'~YON AREA GEi~qiibkL PLA2~HING TASK FORCE; On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Owen Brown,*6694 Pasco ])el Norte, Anaheim, 92807, was appointed to thc Canyon Area General Planning Task Force, replacing Charlene oarnes. MOTIOi! CARRIED. PROPOSED ~NA~tING OF ;~.~7d-{EIl.[ ~'.~q~ICIPAL GOLF. COURSE: I~[ayor Thom presented a com- munication received from i'{r. Don Sparks suggesting that the City Council con- sider renaming the Ana]~eim ilunicipal Golf Course to the Henry G. "Dad" ~{iiler ~[unicipal Golf Course. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council referred the suggestion to the Golf Course Advisory Commission for recommendation, said recommendation to be fon~arded to the City Council as soon as possible, as final decision on the renazaing should be ~ade prior to September 11, 1975. ?.lOTiOil AOJOU}'tNi.~i~T: Councilman Febley moved to adjourn. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. Adjourned: 5:20 P.M. ALOi~A l'I. !iOUGAIID, CITY Deputy ~HomeoWner, Barnes, who now represents the Planning Commission. See Minutes of September 30, 1975, Page 75-878, '~inutes".