1975/10/14City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, 1975, 1:30 P~
The City Council of the City of Anaheim me.~ in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ka~qood, Seymour, Pebley (left at 4:30 P.M.), Sneegas
and Thom
~BSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
PRESEiqT: INTERIM ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William Griffith ~
CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Frank A. Lowry, Jr.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR; Garry O. McRae
STADIUM-CO}~ENTION CENTER-GOLF DIRECTOR: T. F. Liegler
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Ronald Thompson
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahtl
CITY ENGINEER: James F. Maddox
PARK SUPERINTENDENT: Dick Kamphefner
RECREATION SUPERINTENDEI~: Lloyd J. Trapp
RECREATION SUPERVISOR: Patsy Ray
Mayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance
to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Reverend Richard Carmen of the West Anaheim Baptist Church gave
the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ralph G. Sneegas led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION: A Resolution of Appreciation for KWIZ Radio
Station in Santa Aha, unanimously adopted by the Anaheim City Council was pre-
sented to Mr. Pat Michaels.
PROCL~MATIONS: The following prOclamations were issued by Mayor Thom and
unanimously approved by the City Council:
"B'nai B'rith Women Membership Week" - October 12 through 18, 1975 - accepted
by Helen Yamron of the Anaheim Chapter.
"Disabled American Veterans Forget-Me-Not Days" - October 15 through
November 15, 1975 - accepted by Members of the Northern Orange County
Chapter, #94.
MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held August 26,
1975 and Adjourned Regular Meeting held August 27, 1975, were approved, on
motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman SeymoUr. MOTION
CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
_ _
waive the reading 'i'n f~ll 0'f'"~ll ordinances and resolutions, and that consent
to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after
reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the
reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion.
MOTIONUNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT - FINA~NCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the
amoung of $3,333,823.35, in accordance with the 1975-76 Budget, were approved.
REPORT - MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AUDIT - STADIUM-CONVEI~ION CENTER: (Arthur Young &
Company) Mr. Ed Cummins, representing Arthur Young & Company, presented the
final report on results of the Management Practices Audit for the Stadium-
Convention Center Department. He identified the objectives of the report and
outlined the scope of their analysis. He called to Council's attention the
fact that the figures presented in this final report for the year ending
June 30, 1975 are unaudited figures since the Arthur Young & Company is still
in the process of performing the financial audit.
Mr. Cummins reported that the report concludes, on an overall basis, that
the operation of the Stadium-Convention Center Department is well conducted in
an eff±c~ea~ and co$~ effective manner. Hc pointed out that the Arthur Young &
Company was extremely impressed with the "Anaheim Way" philosophy, which was in
evidence at both facilities, and with the planning and coordinating for
efficient staging of events and maximum enjoyment of the attendees. They were
75-915
City Hall,. Anaheim~ .C~lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, 1975,...1.:3~p. P~bl.
also impressed with the efforts made by the Department personnel and Director
to promote the facilities for lncrease~ revenues an~ co L~du~ ~v~k~ wl,~,~v~,
practical.
The major recommendations for improvements reported by Mr. Cummins were as
follows:
1. Increase the Convention Center exhibit space rental rate from $.07 to
$.08 per net square foot per show day. This should result in an increase in
annual revenue of $40,000.
2. Increase the parking lot fee structure at both facilities by a minimum
of $.25. This .should result in an annual increase in revenues to the City of
$150,000.
3. Review the communications setup at the Convention Center and study the
feasibility of providing telephone service to exhibitors. This should result
in both increased revenues for the City from the phone installation, as well as
an improved competitive position through offering service at lower costs than
competitors.
4. Maintenance - in connection with the on-going program of task
scheduling, they suggest the use of cost estimates or planning values to
augment the currently used system. The Arthur Young & Company feels this would
assist in budget preparation activities and that such a system would result in
increased productivity levels equaling an annual cost savings of $50,000.
5. Although box office cash controls appear adequate, the Arthur Young &
Company recommend an in-depth City audit at least once per year. Specific
procedures and guidelines for this audit are presented in the report.
6. It is recommended that the City exercise its contractual right to
conduct an annual audit of the Visitor and Convention Bureau expenditure of
City funds; and provide some direction to the Visitors and Convention Bureau on
expenditure of City funds at the Board level and by participating in budget
preparation.
In connection with the recommendation pertaining to the Visitors and
Convention Bureau, Mr. C-mmins remarked that Arthur Young & Company is
concerned inasmuch as the City's $395,000 support to the Bureau appears as a
line item expense on the Convention Center enterprise fund statement. This
presupposes that Convention Center personnel are controlling the expenditure of
this sum, which is not the case.
At the conclusion of his verbal report, Mr. Cummins presented final copies
of the report on the results of the Management Practices Audit for the Golf
Courses, which had been previously presented in draft form at the Adjourned
Regular Council Meeting of September 23, 1975.
Mr. Liegler commented that he concurs with all of the Arthur Young &
Company recommendations and reported that some of these have already been
implemented. He advised that they agree certain increases in rates at the
Stadium and Convention Center would be in the best interests of the City, but
noted because of the current economic situation and the problems being
experienced by the World Football League, he would not recommend increases in
parking fees at the Stadium for these events, whereas other fees might be
increased relatively soon. He advised that the Arthur Young & Company recom-
mendation on parking fee increases is perhaps low in comparison to similar
facilities in the Southern California area. He advised that the Stadium and
Convention Center staff have prepared an evaluation of the situation and a
recommended fee schedule will be presented for Council consideration in the
near future.
Councilman Seymour remarked that from his evaluation of the Arthur Young &
Company report, he concludes that the Stadium and Convention Center has
received the most outstanding departmental evaluation submitted by the Arthur
Young & Company. He congratulated Mr. Liegler and his staff.
Councilman Seymour stated that recognizing throughout the country there is
no stadium or convention center which is, in fact, profitable, the fact that
Tom Liegler and his organization have been able to bring these operations in
f.~' ' .... ~ = break-even point tbi~ year, and bo~e t~ show a profit next year~
is highly commendable.
75-916
City Hall., Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, !.775~ 1.:.30 P.M.
Mr. Liegler reminded Council Members that while he is present to take the
credit, in addition to the three Division ~ea~s,
Dick Benson, and many Section Chiefs, there, are many Stadium and Convention
Center employees who deserve credit for getting the job done. He advised that
the portion of the Council meeting relating to the Arthur Young & Company
report on the Stadium and Convention Center is being taped and will be played
at an organizational meeting tomorrow, regardless of the findings of the Arthur
Young & Company. He advised that these positive remarks on their work will
serve as a motivator to Stadium and Convention Center employees in continuing
to do such an outstanding job.
b~yor Thom echoed Councilman Seymour's congratulatory remarks.
Councilwoman Kaywood stated that she has heard many compliments, but never
heard any complaints about any function at either the Convention Center or the
Stadium, and considering the fact that people are always quick to criticize,
she felt this to be an amazing record.
MOTION: Councilman Seymour moved that the Arthur Young & Company report on the
results of the Management Practices Audit for the Stadium and Convention Center
be accepted and the recommendations implemented as outlined, and agreed to by
the Stadium-Convention Center Director; and further that the Director present a
time table prior to the first of the year as to when these recommendations will
be implemented. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION: Councilman Thom moved that the City Auditor be requested to audit the
Visitor and Convention Bureau books as recommended by Arthur Young & Company.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Seymour clarified that this audit is not being requested
because of any concerns regarding the management of these funds, but rather
because the City has never exercised its contractual right to do so and good
business practice dictates it be done.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-529 - ESTABLISHING NEW JOB CLASSIFICATIONS - DATA
PROCESSING SCHEDULER: On report and recommendation of Mr. Garry McRae dated
September 30, 1975, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-529 for
adoption, establishing a new job classification of Data Processing Scheduler,
effective October 3, 1975, recommended in the Arthur Young & Company ~nagement
Practices Audit of Data Processing.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.
74R-520 ESTABLISHING A NEW JOB CLASSIFICATION. (Data Processing Scheduler -
schedule 693, $988.00- $1,201.20)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES; COUNCIL ME~EBERS; Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL M~tBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-529 duly passed and adopted.
POLICE SELECTION PROCEDURE - VALIDATION STUDY: Mr. McRae reported that the City
Personnel Department had budgeted funds to conduct a Police Selection Procedure
Validation Study. This study was originally intended to be performed by the
Selection Consultant Center, State of California. However, the technical
personnel who were to conduct that study have left the Center and are now with
a firm which is proposing to do a study specifically in Orange County, Wollock,
Waibel and Associates. He advised that it would be necessary, if Council
wishes to continue to conduct ~hese studies, to authorize the City's
participation in same. The cost to the City would be $3,000 during Fiscal Year
1975-76 and $1,000 during 1976-77. The purpose of the study is to validate the
City's selection standards, interviews, written examinations, performance tests
a[~d b,~:- '- ~ ~ '
~,~ ~n;estiga~ions, to ansur-~ .... ~,~ ~o.~_.,~ . . ce~oly, with current
legislative regulations and are therefore defensible under the law.
75-917
Ci. ty Hall, Anah?im, Ca.!ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, 1975, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. McRae stated that since this work is now required and is of monumental
expense when undertaken by individual jurisdictions, ~ne co~u to pa~Li~i~ iL~
this study is considered very reasonable.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-530: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-530 for
adoption, authorizing the Personnel Director to execute an agreement with
Wollock, Waibel and Associates, as outlined.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND WOLLOCK, WAIBEL & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
RELATING TO CONSULTING SERVICES FOR PERSONNEL SELECTION AI~ AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION THEREOF BY THE CITY PERSONNEL DIRECTOR.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBEr: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-530 duly passed and adopted.
REPORT - SELECTION OF ADMINISTRATOR - SELF-FUNDED HEALTH INSURANCE: (Bayly,
Martin & Fay, Inc.) Mr. Barnes of Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc., presented his
letter dated October 10, 1975 and exhibits attached thereto, which indicate
their recommendations as to a consultant to assist in the selection of an
administrator for the City's proposed self-funded health benefits insurance
program. Me offered to answer'any questions the Council might have regarding
the letter and recommendation.
Councilman Seymour asked for clarification of the statement made in the
letter that both Bayly, }~rtin & Fay, Inc., and Imperial Industries are
subsidiaries of Sperry and Hutchinson Company, New York.
Mr. Barnes replied that this is true, both firms are owned by Sperry and
Hutchinson, however, these two subsidiaries are independently operated and
there is no interlocking management or financial considerations. He pointed
out that they are competitors in certain areas.
Discussion ensued between Council Members and Mr. Barnes during which the
Mayor indicated that since both companies are oWned by the same firm, in his
opinion that would bias the report, making it unacceptable to him.
Councilman Seymour stated that he could not understand how a bid from
Imperial was permitted to be considered or co-mingled with the others and
evaluated by a firm with an obvious conflict. He stated that there is no way
he could vote favorably on the Imperial Industries proposal even if it did
appear to be the best bidder and could provide the best services for the City.
Mr. Barnes responded that his firm submitted the report in order of
preference, listing in priority the four firms they feel could handle the
City's insurance program, and with removal of Imperial Industries from con-
sideration, they would still stand on their recommendation for the second firm.
Ignoring the fact that there is a conflict of interest, Councilman Sneegas
remarked that from the information submitted in the exhibits, he was not
convinced Imperial Industries was actually the best bid. He noted that the
other firms did not submit fee projections in dollar amounts for the second
year, and it would appear to him that the Imperial Industries proposal would
cost the City more in the first year.
Councilman Seymour referred to a letter received from Mr. Roy L. Hurts,
Vice President, Toral-Vahey Associates, 1200 North Main Street, Santa Aha,
which indicates that although they had submitted a bid through the Admar
Corporation, they were not called or notified of any action being taken. The
i~c=~ f~th~r pro~ot~ th~ City's use of a con~u!ti~z fi~ to ~eco~end a
group medical administrator which is also submitting a bid through their own
firm.
75-918
Ci.ty Hall~ A.n.~heim, Ca%ifoKnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - October.14, 1975~. 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Barnes replied that his firm was not involved in the solicitation for
bids processed, that the ~lty itse±r requeste~ an~ received Li~ bid
and they picked up the seven proposals for~administration of the health
benefits program for evaluation. He advised that out of these they eliminated
three for financial reasons, their costs were substantially higher than the
four recommended firms.
In further reply to questions, Mr. Barnes informed the Council t~mt. they
had notified the City of their subsidiary relationship with Imperial Industries
and that Imperial had submitted a bid. He stated that they were advised by the
group working with them from the City Manager's Office that there was the
possibility that Imperial Industries would be eliminated from consideration,
however, since they had submitted the quotations, Bayly, Martin & Fay should
evaluate it along with the rest.
In response to Councilman Sneegas' concern that the Imperial Industries'
proposal appears to cost more than the others based on the information
submitted, Mr. Barnes explained that with a claim assumption in the first year
of $900,000, the difference between the Imperial Industries and the lowest bid
cost on the exhibit is $5,288. He stated that with $900,000 in estimated
claims a 1% claim factor is worth $9,000. He remarked that it is their opinion
that the review and audit systems used by Imperial Industries would more than
equalize the cost differential. He pointed out that other factors were taken
into consideration in their recommendation such as: 'consistency of payment;
the efforts to be put forth by the Anaheim City staff; and concern that the
City would not require a change in administrators after one year of operation.
In reply to Councilman Sneegas, Mr. Barnes stated that no other firms
indicated they had Blue Cross experience and none had submitted a dollar figure
for the second year proposal.
At the conclusion of discussion, it was the consensus of Council opinion
that the relationship between Bayly, Martin & Fay and Imperial Industries
places a cloud over the entire recommendation since there is no way to
determine whether it is unbiased and unprejudiced. Councilman Seymour also
felt it was a matter of bad judgment for a City staff member to suggest tlmt
Bayly, Martin & Fay proceed to evaluate a bid even though associated with the
company making the proposal.
Mr. Roy Campbell, Insurance Broker, introduced Mr. Harvey Christensen,
representing the Independent Insurance Agents Association of Anaheim, who
advised that they have a proposal they would like to submit for review by the
City Council and employee associations. He explained that this insurance
program is based on a multiple employer trust concept, under which large groups
of individual employers bind together to pool claims, experience and premiums.
This type of program could result in a savings of $500,000 for the City from
the existing premium and $892,000 if the 30% increase proposed by Blue Cross is
considered. He briefed the Council on some of the details of the program.
Mayor Thom explained that because of the status of negotiations with the
City's various employee groups, it would not be possible to enter or further
evaluate a new concept in health insurance at this juncture. It was further
suggested by individual Council Members that Mr. Christensen present his
proposal for discussion to the A.M.E.A., Police and Fire Associations and the
I.B.E.W. for their evaluation, as it might be considered a viable alternative
in the following year.
Mr. Paul Ashton, President of Galbraith & Green, stated that they had some
question as to how the proposal they submitted for administration of the self-
funded insurance program for the City would be reviewed when they learned that
Bayly, Martin & Fay would evaluate it. He advised that Bayly, }~rtin & Fay is
one of their competitors. He informed the Council that his firm has had many
years of experience in the field of self-funded insurance benefit
administration. He emphasized that their experience in Blue Cross claims
adjudication was stated incorrectly, that they do have experience in this
field. In response to questions as to why a second year dollar cost fee was
· ,
~,~ ~ ~ ?~ ~o~ '~-. ~nn indicated that t~v ~tid not
interpret the question as asking for a dollar figure.
75-919
City Hall~..~ Anaheim,. California. - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14~ 1975, 1:30.. P.M...
Ar the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Seymour stated that it was
obvious the City would have to retrace its steps insofar as selection o~ an
administrator is concerned. Since the City has already expended funds on the
selection process and is now unable to accept the consultant's recommendations
because of the cloud of doubt cast by the conflict issue, he felt the Council
would now have to rely on the City Personnel Department to complete this
process once again.
By general Council consent, the City Personnel Department was directed to
again solicit proposals for administration of the City's self-funded employees
health benefit program and to notify those firms which have submitted bids that
all bids have been rejected, therefore, in order to be considered they must
resubmit a proposal.
Mr. McRae stated that he would also advise Blue Cross that the City
anticipates they will require a month-to-month arrangement to continue coverase
for the months of November and December at a minimum.
PUBLIC ~F~dtlNG - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-3 A~q3 VARIANCE NO. 2732: Application
of William Lyo~ C0m~'any 'f'°r a change in zone from RS-A-43,000 to P~[-1200 and
the following Code waivers to construct a 304-unit apartment complex on the
north side of Orangethorpe Avenue, west of Imperial Highway, was submitted,
together with E.I.R. No. 153.
a. Minimum floor area.
b. Required enclosure of carports.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-187, condi-
tionally recommended that E.I.R. No. 153 be certified as in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and further recommended that
Reclassification No. 75-76-3 be approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 73 feet in width from the centerline of the street
along Orangethorpe Avenue for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along
Orangethorpe Avenue, including preparation of improvement plans and
installation of all improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street
grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be
complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; that
street lighting facilities along Orangethorpe Avenue shall be installed as
required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public
Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of the
above-mentioned requirements.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60 cents per front foot along Orangethorpe Avenue for tree planting
purposes.
4. That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings,
to Orangethorpe Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
6. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framing.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to tile City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appro-
priate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time tile building
permit is issued.
10. That a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the southerly
approximately one-half of tile east property line and/or that a bond in an
amount and ~orm satisfactory co the City of~a~-~ '*"~* -':'~-~'~ ~-* ...... ~' ~'' ~*'"-~'~. ~ ~--.-
City to guarantee the installation of said six-foot masonry wall.
11. That the setback area along the north and northeast property lines
shall be fully landscaped, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
75-920
pity Hall, Anaheim.,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, 1975~. 1:30 P.M,
l?. That comDletion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of Variance No. 2732.
13. That appropriate water assessment fees, as determined by the Director
of Public Utilities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
14. That all private streets shall be developed in accordance with the
City of Anaheim's standards for private streets.
15. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by
action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one
year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
16. That Condition Nos. 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, and 14, above-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-188,
conditionally recommended that E.I.R. No. 153 be certified as in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act and granted Variance No. 2732,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 75-76-3.
2. That the setback area along the north and northeast property lines
shall be fully landscaped, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
Miss Santalahti briefly described the location of subject property and the
surrounding land uses. She reported that the applicant proposes to develop a ·
304-unit, two-story apartment complex which would include 64 bachelor-type
units, 160 one-bedroom units and 80 two-bedroom units, the net density being
approximately 26 units per acre. She described the vehicular access proposed
and advised that the 499 parking spaces to be provided would be in conformance
with RM-1200 Code standards.
Miss Santalahti further reported that the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the Code waivers requested and also approved the applicant's
proposal that a chain-link fence, rather than masonry wall, be provided at the
northerly property line separating the project from the Yorba Linda Golf
Course, inasmuch as there is a significant topographical difference between the
properties; the applicant has stipulated to a fUlly landscaped setback area and
chain-link fence.
The City Planning Commission approved the use of 304 open carport spaces,
subject to the applicant providing the required 100 cubic feet of general
storage area at each of the respective apartment units.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent were present and wished to
address the Council.
Mr. David Kelly, David Kelly Development Company, advised that he has been
working with the William Lyon Company for about six months on the final plans
for this project. He reported that he has recently completed a 258-unit
apartment project in Costa Mesa which has been very well received and is now
100% occupied. He introduced Mr. Gated Smith, the Architect, who prepared
plans for both these apartment complexes.
Mr. Smith described the topography of the property and stressed that
because of the 30-foot difference a block wall on the northerly property line
would serve little purpose, that the 45-foot landscaped area and chain-link
fence at the top would provide adequate buffering. He described the
architectural style as Spanish. Ha advised that they are in receipt of staff
recommendations in connection with the development and concur with same.
Mr. Smith related that there were several problems to be overcome in the
development of this particular property, namely the Flood Cmntro! District
Channel and a 15-foot sewer easement. He stated that they intend to completely
enclose the flood channel, in accordance with Flood Control District Standards.
This will provide an 8- by 24-foot area to be used as open space, with
75-921
City Hall~ Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14~' ~..97.5, .I:30. P.,M.
~l~nqn~ or driveways. The 15-foot sewer easement will also be utilized as
open space, with no structures being placed on it.
Mr. Smith advised that they are interested in a moderate rental program
for these units, ranging from $175 to $265 per month in the current market.
In reply to Councilwoman Ka~ood, Mr. Smith stated that they are not
permitted by law to limit rentals to adults only, but that the design of the
project is such that it would not lend itself to being a family project. In
addition, 21% of ~he units would be bachelor units, and only 26% of the project
has two bedrooms, and no three bedroom units are proposed.. This would also
tend not to attract families.
In further reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Smith described the measures
planned for noise mitigation from the railroad to the south of the property,
which would include the placement of parking structures between the residential
units and the railroad tracks; no windows or other openings on the railroad
side; and a masonry wall and earthen berm to be constructed to a height one
foot above the line drawn from eight feet at the railroad to six feet above the
building pad height.
For the convenience of interested parties in the audience, plans were
posted on the Council wall.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor or
in opposition.
Mr. John Sponsta, 5463-A Candlewood Circle, Anaheim, advised that he
represents 300 homeowners living in the condominium project adjacent to subject
property who are opposed to the development of an apartment complex because of
the problems which arise in relation to overcrowded schools, increase of
malicious mischief, traffic congestion and noise. He submitted a petition
containing approximately 300 signatures in opposition.
Mr. Sponsta also noted that he had not received notification of the
Planning Commission or City Council hearing on this zoning petition.
Mr. David Kelly responded in rebuttal that they are building this project
with the intent of remaining in ownership. They have not experienced the
problems indicated with tenants in their other facilities and intend to screen
tenants for this project. He noted'that the recreational amenities.which will
be provided include two tennis courts, substantial open space, and swimming
pools and are sufficient for the apartment complex. Therefore, this complex
should place no overload on municipal park facilities.
Mr. Dennis Fick, 5461-B Candlewood Circle, Anaheim, stated that he lives
in the condominium tract adjacent to this property and that he opposed the
development of the apartment complex because of the lack of adequate parking
spaces currently and that the developer is proposing to locate 304 units on a
parcel one-fifth the size of their condominium project. He stated that many
people paid extra for their condominium units because they were told the
William Lyon Company could not acquire the adjacent property and no
construction would take place on it. He also stated that he had not received
notice of public hearings although he lives close to subject property, and that
he called and ascertained that only 29 notices were sent out, but there are 300
property owners living adjacent to subject property.
Mayor Thom pointed out that no variance has been requested from the
parking requirements, therefore, the applicant will be providing the maximum
number which the City could require in conformance with the R~l-1200 Zone.
In response to Councilman Seymour, Mr. Fick reported that he would prefer
that subject property be developed in additional condominium units or a single-
family residential project, rather than apartments. He stated that the
apartment complex is objectionable to every one in his homeowners' association.
In response to comments r~gak'ding lac~ nc.~' .-.~ ion of .~lann~n.o~
Commission and City Council hearings, Miss Santalahti advised that identical
mailing lists were used for both public hearings and that addresses listed as
5463 through 5461 Candlewood Circle and one side of Willow Woods Drive were
75-922
Ci.,ty. Hall, Anahe.im, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, 19,75~ 1:3.0 P.M.
notified. It appears that each of these street addresses actually covers four
units and, therefore, one out of each four property owners rece~ve~
notification.
Councilwoman Kaywood commented that many times the legal notices are
thrown out because they appear to the residents to be junk mail. She stated
that this is one of the reasons she has suggested that a stamp be used to
denote the contents of the envelopes as notices of public hearings.
Mr. Thomas Sarochman, 5459 East Candlewood Circle, Anaheim, stated that
when he and his wife purchased their home in the condominium project, they were
told that single-family homes would be built around them. He stated that he
especially objects to the apartment complex because he bought this condominium
to get away from apartments.
Mr. Peter Ochs, President of the William Lyon Company, clarified that his
firm intends to build this project in conjunction with the David Kelly Develop-
ment Company, which specializes in apartments. They intend to remain involved
as owners of the property.
Mayor Thom clomed the public hearing.
Councilman Seymour stated that the zoning and proposed use of subject
property, although it appears to be a surprise to the condominium owners, is of
no surprise to the City Council or Planning Commission inasmuch as this type of
project for the property was discussed from the beginning of development in the
area approximately three years ago. He related that at public hearings to
consider the zoning of the condominium property, essentially the same arguments
set forth by the condominium owners regarding the apartment complex were
expressed regarding the condominium projects in which they are now living. He
voiced the opinion that the traffic pattern proposed by the developer is much
better than that which was originally planned and certainly to the benefit of
the condominium project. Because the two variances applied for are typical of
those granted for apartment units and the chain link fence justifiable because
of the topography, he could see no legal or moral basis for denying the
reclassification and variance.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 153 - CERTIFICATION: Environmental Impact
Report No. 153, having been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the
City Planning Commission to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and
the State of California Environmental Quality Act, conditioned upon submittal
of supplemental environmental impact information pertaining to the existing
natural spring on the property and the proposed treatment for same, said
supplement to be provided at the time said spring is located on the property
and prior to commencement of construction of the proposed development, the City
Council, acting upon such information and belief, does hereby certify on motion
by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that E.I.R. No. 153 is in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City and State
Guidelines subject to submission of the supplemental report as recommended by
the Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-531: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-531 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance, changing the
zone as reqUested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FI~ING AND DETERMINING
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-76-3,
mX-1200)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES; COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour, Pebley and Sneegam
ABSENT: COUNCIL M~BERS; None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-531 duly passed and adopted.
75-923
City Hall, Anahe.im, Ca.lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - Octobe.r !4, .1975, _.1:30 P,M.~
P~.~T.UTION NO. 75R-532: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-532 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2732, subject to the conditions recommenaea my
the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO.
2732.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour, Pebley and Sneegas
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood and Thom
ABSENT: COUNCIL PlEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-532 duly passed and adopted.
Councilwoman Kaywood explained that she had not voted to approve the
condominium project because she was unhappy with the type of construction
proposed, and since the same developer is involved with this project, she is
voting negatively on the same basis.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1560; Application of Gulf Oil Corporation to con-
struct a billboard exceeding the maximum permitted display area on CL property
at 1201 South Beach Boulevard was submitted together with application for
exemption status from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact
report.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-183,
reported that the Planning Director has determined the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3, of the City of Anaheim
Guidelines to the requirement for an environmental impact report and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file same and further
denied Conditional Use Permit No. 1560.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by
Mr. Robert'F. Reid of Foster and Kleiser, and public hearing scheduled this
date.
Miss Santalahti described the location and use of subject property. She
reported that the applicant proposes to remove an existing double-faced
illuminated "posted panel" billboard located at the northwest corner of subject
property and replace it with a single-faced illuminated billboard with a
display area of 672 square feet. She advised that there is in addition to this
sign, which is proposed to be removed and replaced, a service station
identification sign and another billboard on the property.
Miss Santalahti read the findings upon which the City Planning Commission
denied the conditional use permit; primarily because the size of the proposed
billboard is more than twice as large as is permitted and that a second
billboard would remain on subject property.
Mr. Robert F. Reid, representing Foster and Kleiser, 1550 West Washington
Boulevard, Los Angeles, referred to his firm's cooperative attitude as
displayed in 1968 when the new outdoor advertising ordinance was enacted and
they removed all of their billboards from the freeways.
He contended that one of the reasons the section in the ordinance which
allows that signs exceeding 300 feet maximum display area may be permitted, via
the conditional use permit procedure, was written into the ordinance to provide
his firm and other sign companies an opportunity to recoup some of their losses
as to the removal of the signs adjacent to the freeways.
Mr. Reid voiced the opinion that the approval of this particular sign
would not set a precedent because these are very expensive to build. He called
attention to the fact that this poster panel would replace the billboard which
· ac~ ~o~ou~ traff~-c ~" ~ Read,
is in place and thag i~ is plat, ned to ~' - th= ..... ' ~ ' ·
whereas the other sign on the property faces Beach Boulevard. He advised that
he had personally inspected the proposed site and found that it is not close to
a residential area and the sign would fit in with the surrounding businesses.
75-924
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14~ 7975, 1.:~0 P.M.
Mr. Reid submitted photographs of the existing sign and the proposed
poster panel for Council review. He descr~be~
billboard is 14 feet by 48 feet, rectangular, and when used as a painted
bulletin, would be 2 feet higher.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Maddox indicated that he was not
aware of any study which has been conducted to determine whether or not bill-
boards are a causative factor in accidents.
In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Reid stated that he believes the
proposed sign fits in the area because billboards are recognized as a
legitimate business by the State of California and should be permitted in
commercial and industrial zones.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor or
in opposition to Conditional Use Permit No. 1560.
Mr. Ben Bay, 2148 West Grayson Avenue, Anaheim, stated that he could not
understand the reason for the debate, that the Council should either change or
enforce the existing sign ordinance.
Mayor Thom advised that the appellate procedure built into the ordinance
provides for the appliCant's right to appeal the Planning Commission decision
to the City Council.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being
no response, he declared the hearing closed.
CATEGORICAL EX~PTION - ENVIRONMENTAL I~ACT REPORT: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council ratified the
determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within
the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to
the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to file an environmental impact
report. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-533: Councilwoman Radwood offered Resolution No. 75R-533
for adoption, upholding the decision of the City Planning Commission, denying
Conditional Use Permit No. 1560.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHE~[ DEI~ING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 1560.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS; Kaywood, Seymour and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MF~MBERS: Pebley and Sneegas
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The l,~yor declared Resolution No. 75R-533 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved for a five-minute recess. Councilman Thom
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:50 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Members of the City
Council being present. (3:55 P.M.)
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PEP~MIT NO. 1564: Application by Recreational
Vehicles Service Center ~/1 for the following Code waivers to permit an outdoor
recreational center on ML zoned property located at the southwest corner of
Carpenter Avenue and Shepard Street, was submitted together with application
for negative status from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact
report.
a. Fe£~aitced u~Cacor-'~ ' .... ~oco.
b. Required enclosure of outdoor uses.
75-925
Ci~ .~1!, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, ~975,.1:30 P.~[.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-191, recom-
mended that the City Council declare suDject project ~x~a~ f~.uu~ ~h= ~=~ui~-
sent to file an environmental impact report and further denied Conditional Use
Permit No. 1564.
Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Mr.
John M. Huish, Huish b~nagement Company, and public hearing scheduled this
date.
Miss Santalahti described the location of subject property as well as the
surrounding land uses and zoning. She reported that the proposal is to
construct an outdoor recreational facility in three phases. The first two
phases would include batting cages, trampolines, dragster track and an
amusement building.
Miss Santalahti read the findings upon which the City Planning Commission
based their denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 1564, primarily that the
proposed recreational center would be an intrusion into the industrial area and
that further breakdown of the integrity and protection of said area would be to
the detriment of existing industrial uses and future development of same;
further that there is extremely limited access to subject property which could
create potential traffic problems which might curtail industrial expansion.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present and wished to
address the Council.
Mr. Rick Dentt, 2150 4th Avenue, San Diego, California, representing
Mr. John. M. Huish presented a plot plan and pictures of similar recreational
establishments owned and operated by the Huish Mmnagement Company for Council
review.. He stated that Mr. Huish has been in the recreational facilities
business for 18 years in various cities and his enterprises include Golf World
in Anaheim.
Mr. Dentt described the type of projects proposed for this site and noted
that this particular property is well-suited to their use for the following
reasons: 1) visibility from the freeway; 2) easy access to the property from
the freeway; and 3) the existing Camelot Golf Course development.
Mr. Dentt remarked that it is the trend now to add on to existing
commercial recreational centers and congregate more uses. This enables the
entire family to attend and participate in the various recreational amenities
either individually or collectively. Mr. Dentt stated that this project would
act as a buffer between the freeway and the industrial development to the
north. The traffic which would be generated by this type of project would be
experienced primarily on weekends and in the evening hours and, therefore,
would not conflict with traffic to and from the industrial area during normal
business hours. He stated that they believe this proposal would be more
compatible with the Camelot Miniature Golf Course than the recreational vehicle
sales, repair and service center for which there is an approved variance
(Variance No. 2361) on the property.
In response to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Dentt advised they had contacted
most of the industries in the immediate area prior to the Planning Commission
hearing and at that time there was no opposition to this project.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either in
favor or in opposition.
Mr. Robert Kenney, representing Kenney Golf Enterprises, Inc., which firm
owns and operates the Camelot Miniature Golf Course establis~nent located
immediately adjacent to subject site, advised that they have issued a letter in
opposition to the proposal dated September 9, 1975 and addressed to the City
Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Kenney stated that their golf course
project was accepted by the City in 1970 because it provided a source of
entertainment for families; a park for the City; as well as a good tax base.
He related that they believe the proposed use is not in keeping with their
~i~in~l in~ntion and would not further ~h~ ?,rpo~e o~ family recreational
activities. In their experience, the type of recreational amenities to be
provided in this proposed project attracts the age groups between 14 and 20
years, and the type of groups which make an area undesirable for families to
75-926
C__ity. ~all,. A~aheim,..~.Ca!i.f?Knia .~ COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, 197~,.1:..30 P.M.
£re~uent. Additionally, this group generates security problems; in some
instances security men with guns and guard'dogs have nag no oe use~. ~ney feel
this ~uld tend to disrupt their business and be detrimental.
Mayor Thom pointed out that he was a member of the City Council in 1970
when the application to place the Camelot Miniature Golf Course in the
industrial area was originally presented and recalled that this recreational
land use in the industrial zone was denied by the City Planning Commission and
bitterly opposed by the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce and the industrial area.
However the City Council saw fit to permit the golf course, and now he views
subject application in much the same way.
Mr. Uldis Dailacis, Kilroy Company Project Manager, 515 South Flower,
Los Angeles, owners of the property and two large industrial buildings located
to the east of the proposed recreational park site, submitted a letter stating
that they vigorously oppose the development of drag racing strips and batting
cages as described in the application for Conditional Use Permit No. 1564; that
they believe this would be an unnecessary and undesirable intrusion upon the
Northeast Anaheim Industrial Area.
Councilman Seymour questioned whether it was Kilroy Company who had
originally sold the property to the owners of the Camelot Golf Course, and upon
receiving an affirmative reply fromMr. Dailacis, remarked that the comments they
have submitted regarding the preservation of the integrity of the industrial
area are invalidated by their prior action.
Mr. James Caine of Colwell Banker representing Mr. Fred Ritler, owner of a
five-acre parcel immediately north of subject property, advised that his client
wishes to register objection to the proposed conditional use permit because
this property is currently in escrow to an industrial developer who opposes the
project.
Mr. Ben Bay, 2148 West Grayson Avenue, questioned whether the traffic
increase on La ?alma Avenue from the proposed development has been estimated,
to which Mr. Maddox replied negatively since no anticipated attendance figures
were available.
Mr. John Huish reiterated that during the daytime hours and especially
between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. this recreational facility would attract very little
traffic; their primary hours of business are Friday and Saturday nights, Sunday
afternoons and holidays and during the summer, In general, he emphasized that
this project will not generate traffic which will present a problem for the
industrial uses.
Mayor Thom closed the public hearing.
Miss Santalahti read the resolution submitted by the Industrial Relations
Committee of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce which places them on record in
support of the Planning Commission action in denying Conditional Use Permit No.
1564.
Councilman Pebley left the Council Chamber. (4:25 P.M.)
Mayor Thom pointed out that when the Camelot Miniature Golf Course was
originally proposed, the City Council acted favorably on it over the Planning
Commission's denial and that activity has proven to be, in his opinion, one of
the more attractive businesses in the community and has not caused any problem
whatsoever to the industrial sector by its operation. He felt that the current
proposal would not pose a threat to either the industrial area nor to the
operation of the Camelot Golf Course.
Councilman Seymour stated that he was one of those Planning Commissioners
who vehemently opposed the Camelot Golf Course, as well as the recreational
vehicle facility, because of the intrusion of a different use in each case into
an industrial area. However, the facts being what they are, he advised that he
now concurs with the remarks made by the Mayor in support of this project. He
urged a~diniona~iy, so ~ no further intrusions are created int~
industrial area, that the Planning Commission be directed to review and make
recommendation relative to redrawing of the boundary line of the industrial
area which has been typically the Riverside Freeway. He stated it would appear
75-927
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14~ 1975, 1:30 P.M.
'~ l.ir. tk-_t La P~_!m~ A?'~_n,,= wn,,1d fnrm the most lozical southerly boundary for
the industrial uses. He advised that on that basis he would vote in favor of
the conditional use permit.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that she also was opposed as a Planning Com-
missioner to the introduction of these other uses in the industrial zone and
has not changed her mind. She pointed out that there is a very limited amount
of land for industrial use whereas there is an ample supply of C-R area in the
City.
At the conclusion of discussion, Miss Santalahti reported that it would be
appropriate to include an additional condition regarding the lighting on
subject property as well as to terminate Variance No. 2361 should the Council
approve subject conditional use permit.
Councilman Pebley returned to the Council Chamber. (4:29 P.M.)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council finds that the proposed
project will have no significant effect on the environment and is exempt from
the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-534: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 75R-534 for
adoption, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 1564, subject to the
Interdepartmental Conditions with the addition of the following condition:
"That the lighting of subject property shall be oriented in such a way as
not to interfere with traffic on the Riverside Freeway; and that petitioner
shall obtain a favorable letter from CalTrans, indicating the proposed lighting
will not be detrimental nor hazardous to the safety of the freeway traffic;
and, furthermore, that said letter shall be submitted to the Planning Depart-
ment prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this
resolution."
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHE~ GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PE~IT NO. 1564.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood
ABSENT: COUNCIL M~ItBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-534 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-535; Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 75R-535 for
adoption, terminating Varianc~ No. 2361.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL
PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 2361.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL M~ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT'. COUNCIL M~-~ERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-535 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - SUBDIVISION MAP ORDINANCE: To consider repealing Chapter 17.08
of the Anaheim Municipal Code and adding a new Chapter 17.08 relating to
subdivisions.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-201, recom-
mended adoption of a new Chapter 17.08 relating to subdivisions, shown as
Exhibit "A", attached, which includes Option "C".
75-924
City Hall, ~nahei~,..California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14~.1975, .~:3Q P.M.
Staff report to the City Planning Commission and City Council dated
· September 29, 1975, was previously submitte~ £or ~ounczi i~fv~,~,~i~,~ =,~
consideration.
Councilwoman Kaywood referred to Page Nos. 3 and 4 of said staff report
which outlined the three options available to the Council (Option "A" relating'
to school site dedication; Option "B" relating to reservation for "public"
uses; and Option "C" relating to soil reports). Of these three options, only
"C" was recommended for inclusion by the City Planning Commission, and
Councilwoman Kaywood stressed that she would prefer Options "A" and "B" be
included in the ordinance adopted by Council as well.
Councilman Pebley left the Council Chamber. (4;30 P.M.)
The Mayor asked if anyone in the Chamber wished to address the Council
regarding the proposed subdivision map ordinance.
Mr. James Barisic, Vice President, Anaheim Hills, Inc., restated their
opinion as presented to the City Planning Commission, that Options "A" and "B"
penalize~ the developer since they would allow the taking of property without
recognizing its full fair market value.
Mr. Lowry reported that there is a method provided in the State law for
computing the compensations to be made to developers by means of a complicated
formula. He advised, in reply to Council questions, that the Planning
Commission basically concurred with Mr. Barisic that Options "A" and "B" were
not necessary in the ordinance. He indicated that "A" is an option available
to elementary school districts and not the City. The Planning Commission felt
that since no input was received from the school districts, this clause could
be added to the ordinance in the future if needed. They had basically the same
opinion regarding Option "B", i.e., it could be inserted at a later date if
necessary.
Councilman Seymour pointed out that there are some serious ramifications
inherent in these tw6 options. He specifically pointed out the possibility
that with Options "A" and "B" included in the ordinance, the City Council could
then arbitrarily decide to impose a condition of land dedication which could
make the project economically infeasible.
During discussion, Councilman Sneegas also raised the point of whether or
not these options would be imposed against a property owner who has held his
property for some length of time, or against the developer of a single acre
versus the person who has accumulated 40 acres.
The ~yor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being
no response, he declared the public hearing closed.
At the conclusion of Council discussion, it was the opinion of several
Council Members and the City Attorney that there are questions remaining to be
resolved regarding the imposition of Options "A" and "B", which should be
reviewed by staff for further report to the Council.
Councilman Seymour suggested, as an alternative, that the City explore a
school fee similar to the park in-lieu fee concept.
ORDINA~,~CE NO. 3474: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3474 for first
reading as recommended by the City Planning Commission (without Options "A" and
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING CHAPTER 17.08 AND ADDING A NEW
CHAPTER 17.08 RELATING TO SUBDIVISIONS.
FINAL MA~,.. TR~,CT_ NO. ~992: Developer, Warmington Company; tract located on the
east side of P~gnolia Avenue, south of Lincoln Avenue; containing 64 IBM-1200
lots.
',ne Cxty Engin~~ r=co~ended apprcva! and reported that s,~id final map
conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that public
improvements have been accepted and no additional bonds or fees are required.
75-929
Cigy H~ll~ Anaheim,~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 1,4~ i,~75~ ,1:3.0 P.M.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5, Final Map of Tract No. 8992,
together with its ~eslgn ana mmprovemen~ wa~
City's General Plan and was further approved as recommended by the City
Engineer, on motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Thom.
Councilwoman Kaywood voted "no". Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
TRACT NO. 7945 - REQUEST FOR A2~E}~MENT TO REQUIR~,~ENT FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESSWAY:
Request of Mr. Jack Peterson, President, Kaliedoscope Homeowners Associa~{0n,
for an amendment to the requirement for a pedestrian accessway at the terminus.
of Feather and Hampstead Streets, dated September 17, 1975, was submitted for
Council consideration. Tract No. 7945 is located on the west side of Walnut
Street, north of Cerritos Avenue, and was daveloped pursuant to
Reclassification No. 72-73-10 (1).
Council discussion centered upon the reason that this requirement was
included originally, which as far as anyone could recall, or the written record
disclosed, was for the purpose of permitting children living within Tract }~o.
7945 and the adjacent single-family tract access to the north to travel to and
from school.
Mr. Jack Peterson, 1381 Walnut, Unit No. 1904, Anaheim, advised that the
only accessway the closure of this opening would affect would be that of the
children living within Tract No. 7945 who travel to the north to school. He
stated that this route is not actually a short cut, that the school is just as
easily accessible to the children by traveling down Walnut Street and Ball
Road. Mr. Peterson stated that the residents on Feather Street are also in
favor of closing this accessway since it brings transient traffic through their
cul-de-sac. He related that there have been problems with vandalism and even a
burglary, which have been aided by the availability of this pedestrian access,
through which motorized vehicles cannot travel.
Mr. Watts suggested that the best way to ensure that everyone who might be
affected by such a change is notified, would be to set the matter for public
hearing.
Councilman Sneegas suggested for Mr. Peterson's convenience, that he
circulate a letter to all those property owners who receive a notice of public
hearing and have it signed to the effect that they do not oppose the closing of
the pedestrian accessway at Feather and Hampstead Streets, as this might
obviate the necessity for him making another trip for the public hearing.
MOTION: Councilman Seymour moved that amendment to Condition No. 6 of
Resolution No. 72R-406 and Condition No. 5 of Ordinance No. 3198 relating to
Reclassification Nos. 72-73-10 and 72-73-10 (1) be set for public hearing.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Sneegas moved to recess to Executive
Session. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. Councilman Pebley absent.
MOTION CARRIED. (5:00 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Members of the City
Council being present with the exception of Councilman Pebley. (6:30 P'M.)
PARCEL MAP NO. 441 - DRAINAGE FEES: Request from Cecil C. Wright, 60 Plaza,
Orange, California, on behalf of his client, a property owner in the northeast
industrial area, for permission to postpone payment of drainage fees until the
time of application for building permits, was submitted at the City Council
meeting of September 30, 1975 and continued to this date, pending report from
the City Attorney's Office.
Councilman Seymour left the Council Chamber. (6:32 P.M.)
Report from the City Attorney's Of£ice dated October 10, 1975 was
submitted recommending that the City not change its policy of collecting drain-
age fees prior to approval of parcel maps and prior to Council approval of sub-
divi~i~ tr~ '~p~ f~r all re~ident~l co~me~cia! and industrial property with
the exception of the Anaheim Canyon Industrial Area. where it is recommended
drainage fees be charged and collected at the time of application for building
permits.
75-930
.City ~al~, ~na. heim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, 1975, 1:30. P~M.
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the
City Council accepted the recommendation regarui~ d~iL~ f~c~ ~o .... ~-~ i~
the City Attorney's memorandum of October 10, 1975, with provision for
exceptions in the Anaheim Canyon Industrial Area to allow the developers to pay
drainage fees at the time of application for building permits. Council Members
Seymour and Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-536 - PELANCONI PAP~: On report and recommendation from the
City Attorney's Office, Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 75R-536 for
adoption, approving the terms and conditions of an agreement with certain
developers relating to Pelanconi Park.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROViNG THE TE~MS AND
CONDITIONS OF AN AGREF~[ENT AND ADDEI~UM THERETO ESTABLISHING PELANCONI PARK,
PROVIDING FOR THE DEDICATION OF LA}~, THE PAYMENT OF FEES IN LIEU THEREOF, AND
THE TE~{S AND CONDITIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAID PAP~K; AN-D AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ~XECUTE SAID AGREemENT. (70-71-13 and Tract No. 8783)
Roll Call Vote: -
AYES: COUNCIL M~ERS: Kaywood, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MIR.~ERS: None
b~ORARILY ABSEI'~: COUNCIL M~BERS: Seymour
ABSENT: COUNCIL M~ERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-536 duly passed and adopted.
REPRESENTATION ON TASK FORCE - CULTURAL ARTS ORGANIZATIONS: (Discussion con-
tinued from the meetings of July 8, 1975 and September 30, 1975.) A list of
organizations interested in representation on a permanent Cultural Arts
Facility Task Force was submitted by the Cultural Arts Commission together with
recommendation that each of these organizations listed be requested to select a
representative to serve on said task force.
Councilman Seymour returned to the Council Chamber. (6:33 P.M.)
Councilman Seymour stated that he was under the impression originally that
there were some 35 to 40 cultural groups interested in the establishment of a
permanent Cultural Arts Facility and, therefore, questioned the fact that so
few organizations were listed as being interested in this project. He stated
this indicates to him that either there is not the problem which was
communicated earlier, or there is a lack of interest.
Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that the Anaheim Arts Council represents
23 separate groups.
Mr. Trapp advised the list submitted represents those organizations who
attended the Cultural Arts Commission meeting on this subject Monday,
October 6, 1975.
Discussion ensued between Council Members and representatives o£ Par~s,
Recreation and the Arts Department, Patsy Ray and Lloyd Trapp, during which
Miss Ray pointed out that there is no one facility around which the Cultural
Arts orsanizations can gravitate and identify. She advised the Cultural Arts
Commission has diligently extended the Council's invitation to participate on
the Task Force to the various Cultural Arts groups in the City. These groups
are perhaps reluctant to come forward because of a credibility gap.
Councilman Seymour stated that he did not wish to endorse a Cultural Arts
Task Force as being representative of the broad spectrum of Cultural Arts
organizations when, in fact, it would not be. He suggested that this matter be
referred back to the Cultural Arts Commission and that they attempt to put this
proposal into a more cohesive form, perhaps by appointing a subcommittee under
its jurisdiction to study the establishment of a permanent Cultural Arts
Facility.
TRACT NO. 7417 - ~ O FOR .........~~o~,,~ _ Po~,,~=~.~_~__o submitted b
Mr. Leonard F. Goodman of Pacesetter Homes, Inc. for issuance of 12 building
permits currently being withheld by the Planning Department, continued from the
meeting of October 7, 1975, was resubmitted.
75-931
City .Hal.1, .Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MIMUTES - october, 1~4, 197,5, 1:.3,0 P.M.
Mr. Thompson reported that the developer requires additional time to
evaluate the report from the Orange ~ounr_y
attenuation measures adjacent to the railroad track.
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the
request regarding ·issuance of building permits for Tract No. 7417 was continued
to. the meeting of October 28, 1975. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARP, lED.
CONSEi~ CALENDAR ITE~: On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by
Councilwoman Kaywood, the following actions were authorized in accordance with
the reports and recommendations as furnished each Council Member and as listed
on the Consent Calendar Agenda:
1. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to
the insurance carrier:
a. Claim. submitted by Robert P. Schneiderhan for injuries purportedly
sustained as a result of condition of floor of restroom at Anaheim Stadium, on
or about August 30, 1975.
b. Claim submitted by Steve Moore for damage purportedly sustained as a
result of actions of Anaheim Police Officers, on or about September 19, 1975.
c. Claim submitted by Glenn F. Thomas for damages purportedly sustained
as a result of collision with City vehicle, on or about October 2, 1975.
2. PUBLIC DANCE PERMITS: The following permits were granted subject to the
recommendations of the Chief of Police:
a. Permit requested by Martha L. Morris, Kallman Productions for dance to
be held October 19, 1975 from 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at the Anaheim
Convention Center, 800 West Katella Avenue.
b. Permit requested by Martha L. Morris, Kallman Productions for dance to
be held October 26, 1975, from 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at the Anaheim
Convention Center, 800 West Katella Avenue.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed:
a. Before the PUC -Application of~The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph
Company, a corporation, for a permanent tariff covering the offering of 80lA
Dial PBX Service - Interim Opinion.
b. Orange County Board of Supervisors Resolution - Tentatively approvimg
Anaheim Memorial Hospital Nurse Paramedic Unit Proposal.
c. Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County - Resolution
Service.
d. Cultural Arts Commission - Minutes - September i1, 1975 and Anaheim
Arts Council - Minutes - September 9, 1975.
e. Anaheim Golf Course Advisory Commission - Minutes - September 23 and
25, 1975.
f. Community Center Authority - Minutes - September 22, 1975.
g. Orange County Mosquito Abatement District -Minutes - September 18~
1975.
h. Community Redevelopment Commission - Minutes - September 3~ 10, and
17, 1975.
Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOS. 75R-537 AND 75R-538: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution
Nos. 75R-537 and 75R-538 for adoption, in accordance with the reports and
recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
Calendar Agenda.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-537 - DEEDS OF EASE~ENT. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE -~ITY OF ANAHEI'M 'AccEf~I~:G cERTAIN DEEDS A>m ORDERI~,'G T~EIR RECORDATION.
(Douglas S. Johns, et al.; State Industries, a California corp.; Harold R.
Jones, et ux.; William J. Murphy, et al.; Joseph M. Anton, et al.; Esther M.
,~=... ~enn, et ux.; Cel~, A. Ar~ining.n: .~arry !4eibs, et ux,;
David A. Bock, et ux.; Robert J. Hockenberry, et ux.; C. O. Watters, et ~.;
Brian Kimball, et ux.; Jack C. McGreevey, et ux.)
75-932
~Anaheim~_z_California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14LI975, 1:30 P..M.
,,^ , ~ · ~ p~..R~I.IITION OF TIlE CI~ COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-DJO - ~o~ o~
OF THE CI~ OF ~AtlEIbi FINDING AND DETERMINING T~T PUBLIC CO~ENIENCE
NECESSI~ REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION Al,rD COI?LETION OF A PUBLIC ~ROV~4ENT TO
WIT; ~CLID ~ SU~IST LIBP~RY FURNITURE, IN TIlE CI~ OF AN~EIM, WORK ORDER
NO. 1051. ~PROVING THE DESIGNS, P~NS~ PROFILES, D~WINGS A~ SPECIFICATIONS
, , AUTt.~ORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC
FOR THE GOz~S~UCTION THEREOF;
iI~ROV~{ENT IN ACCO~ANCE WI~ SAID P~NS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; A~
AUTHORIZING ~ DIRECTING THE CI~ CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING S~ED
PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION TtiEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - November 6, 1975,
2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote;
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS; Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES; COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSE~rr: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 75R-537 and 75R-538 duly passed
and adopted ·
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held September 29, 1975, pertaining to the following applications
were submitted for City Council information and consideration.
Mrs. Roberts advised that the appeal period for these items expires
October 21, 1975 at 5:00 p.m., but that they are included on this Agenda
because a Council quorum is not anticipated on that date.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
City Council authorized the actions pertaining to environmental impact require-
ments as recommended by the City Planning Commission and sustained the actions
taken by the City Planning Commission in connection with the following
applications:
1. F2~VIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: The Planning Com-
mission recommends to the City Council that the subject projects in the
following listed zoning applications be declared exempt from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report, pursuant to the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act:
Conditional Use Permit No. 1565 Conditional Use Permit No. 1567
Variance No. 2735
2. ENVIRONM~.NTAL I~ACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EX~2~PTIONS: The Planning
Director has determined that the proposed activities in the following listed
zoning applications fall within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the
City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact
report and are, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an
environmental impact report:
Conditional Use Permit No. 1566 Conditional Use Permit No. 1568
Variance No. 2734 Variance No. 2736
Variance No. 2737
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1565: Southern Pacific Industrial Development
Company to permit an outdoor lumber storage yard on ML zoned property at 1213
East Howell Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-193,
approved said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1566: Ronald R. and Shirley J. Cosby to permit
an automobile auction and reconditioning facility on ~-~ zoned property at 1320
Tustin Avenue.
£h~ ~icy ~" ~.~ ~i~s~on. oursuant to Resolution No. PC75-194,
approved said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
5. COICDITIONAL USE PERPilT NO. 1567: Application by Lloyd Klein to permit
automobile sales agencies on RS-A-43,000 (0) property on the south side of La
75-933
City, Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, 1975~ 1:30 P.M.
~ ~ _ ~ ....... ~ ....... T.~ ~o~ A,~n,,~ mhd Armando Street, with Code waivers
of:
a. Minimum structural setback.
b. Required site screening. (Withdrawn)
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-195,
approved said conditional use permit in part, waiver "b" having been withdrawn,
subject to conditions.
6. CO~PDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1568: Application by Comet, Inc., to establish
an automobile painting and body repair shop on ML property at 1713 North
Orangethorpe Park.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-196,
approved said conditional use permit for a period of two years, subject to
conditions.
7. VARIANCE NO. 2734: Application by Robert L. and Clara L. Aberegg to permit
an existing garage conversion on RS-A-43,000 property at 2201 North Redwood
Drive, with Code waivers of:
a. Minimum front setback.
b. Minimum number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-197, granted
said variance.
8. VARIAI~CE NO. 2736: Application by Stafac, Inc., to establish an automobile
upholstery shop on CL zoned property at 3174 West Ball Road, with Code waiver
of:
a. Permitted uses in the CL Zone.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-199, granted
said variance, subject to conditions.
9. VARIANCE NO. 2737: Application by b~rtha Bircher to establish retail sales
.
in a converted residence on RS-A-43,000 zoned property at 312 North Brookhurst
Street, with Code waivers of:
a. Minimum number of parking spaces.
b. Permitted uses.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-200, denied
said variance.
10. E.I.R. - NEGATIVE DECLARATION - GRADING PERMIT, 6474 VIA COF~tAL: On
recommendation of the City Planning Commission, the City Council determined
that application for grading permit to construct a swimming pool and recreation
building for an existing single-family residence at 6474 Via Corral will have
no significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, exempt from the
requirement to prepare an environmental impact report.
11. E.I.R. - NEGATIVE DECLAP, ATION - GRADING PER>IIT, 5231 CRESCENT DRIVE: On
recommendation of the City Planning Commission, the City Council determined
that application for grading permit for a single-family residence at 5231
Crescent Drive will have no significant effect on the environment and is,
therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact
report.
12. CONDITIONAL USE PEPR~IT NO. 1558: City Planning Commission Resolution No.
PC75-202 amending Condition No. 1 of Resolution No. PC75-177, nunc pro tunc due
to clerical error. Conditional Use permit No. 1558 relates to ML zoned prop-
erty located at the southeast corner of Santa Ana and Atchison Streets and was
~proved to mermit metal reclamation and outdoor storage of rags, paper and
metal.
75-934
C.~.ty Hall, Anaheim, California - CO.U~CIL MINUTES - October 14., 1~7.5, l:3,Q .p..~..
.... ~,~n,,, ~Tn 7. n .... l~r C.. Michael. Inc.: tract
located at the southeast corner of Vermont Avenue and East Street; containing
,
119 proposed P&I-4000 zoned lots.
Tract No. 8758, Revision No. 1, was continued to be considered in
conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 133 and Variance No. 2-728.
Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING COb~ISSION IT~IS: The following action taken by the City Planning
Commission at their meeting held September 29, 1975 pertaining to the following
application was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
VARIANCE NO. 2735: Application by Richard Lutz to construct an office building
on RS-A-43,000 zoned property at 505 South Euclid Street, with Code waivers of:
a. Minimum number of parking spaces.
b. Maximum building height.
c. Minimum building setback.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-198, recom-
mended that subject project be declared exempt by the City Council and approved
said variance subject to conditions.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that there is a proposal described in the
application for this variance for use of one of the buildings as a massage
parlor. She stated that she did not wish to vote favorably on the variance if
this would allow a massage parlor as one of the tenants.
Miss Santalahti explained that the City Planning Commission was also
concerned about the inclusion of a massage parlor as one of the tenants in the
proposed building and at the Planning Commission hearing this matter was
discussed, and the applicant indicated that this prospective tenant was no
longer interested in the location, and therefore advised they were not going to
have a massage parlor. In any event Miss Santalahti explained that a massage
parlor, or any other use in any zone, which would restrict the age of patrons
or employees to 18 years or older would require a separate conditional use
permit application.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
City Council found that this project will have no significant effect on the
environment and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report as recommended by the City Planning Commission and
took no further action on said application thereby sustaining the action taken
by the City Planning Commission. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
ACCESS TRAIL TO YORBA REGIONAL PAP. K: In response to the request submitted by
H. G. Osborne, Director, Environmental Management Agency, County of Orange, for
determination as to the conformity with the City of Anaheim's General Plan of
the access trail to Yorba Regional Park, the City Council, on motion by
Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, sustained the City Planning
Commission action determining said access trail to be in conformance With the
Anaheim General Plan and that it would have no adverse environmental impact and
is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to file an environmental impact
report. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-539 - AWARD OF CONTRACT (ACCOUNT NO. 2~0-462-922-01 AND
100-425-241: in accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman
Sneegas offered Resolution No. 75R-539 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PRO-
POSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISH-
ING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, ~ATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES
~.~ ~o^~ooowA~ON~ INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AI~ WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK
I,IECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT A~ COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPRUV~iENT:
APPLICATION OF TRAFFIC STRIPE PAINT, PAVLMENT btaRIKINGS, AND DEVICES ON VARIOUS
STREETS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NOS. 2~0-462-922-01 AND 100-425-241.
(Safety Striping Service, Inc. - $98,685.00)
75-935
City Hall~ Anah.~eim~.~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14, 1975, !;30 P.M.
AYES: COUNCIL M~.IBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES' COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSEh~f; COUNCIL M~fBERS: Pebley
The F~yor declared Resolution No. 75R-539 duly passed and adopted.
PURCHASES - DUCTILE IRON PIPE AND SHUNT CAPACITORS:_ The Interim Assistant City
,Manager reported on informal bids received fo~ the following purchases and
recommended acceptance of the low bid in each case:
Ductile Iron Pipe (Bid No. 3005) - Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe - $27,341.33,
including tax.
150 KVAR 7200 volts single phase Shunt Capacitors (Bid No. 3006) - Westinghouse
Electric Supply Company- $17,973.36, including tax.
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council authorized the purchase of Ductile Iron Pipe and 80 Shunt Capacitors
from the low bidders as recommended by the City Manager's Office in the amounts
shown above. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3472: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3472 for
adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING TITLE 13, CHAPTER 13.08, SECTION
13.08.045 TO THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO RECREATION PER,MITS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEb~ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL M~WBERS: None
ABSE~f: COUNCIL M~tBERS: Pebley
The ~yor declared Ordinance No. 3472 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3473: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3473 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-59 (4), CO)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEb[BERS: None
ABSE~,~f: COUNCIL M~2-[BERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3473 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3475: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3475 for first
reading.
AN OP~DINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAttEIM REPEALING SECTION 4.32.050 OF THE AI~AHEIM
b~JNICIPAL CODE.
ORDINANCE NO. 3476: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3476 for first
reading.
AN ORDIN~CE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A>!ENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3443, NqJNC PRO TUNC,
RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-63 (4), corrects legal description)
OF, DINANCE NO. 3477: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance i~o. 3477 fu£ flrst
reading.
= 6
7~-93
City ~all., Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINIJTES, - Octobe. r .1,.4~ .1,975, .!.:3Q. P:M.
.......... .~,.,~= mo mu= mT~v n~ A~.A~P. TH AMEMDING TI~E 18 OF THE ~N~EIM ~NICIP~
CODE RE~TING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (65), C-R)
O~INANCE NO. 3478: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3478 for firs~
read~ng.
AN OP, DINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM DfUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-33 (12), RS-A-43,000)
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-540 - ANAHEIM LAKE AGREEMEnt: On report and recommendation of
the City Attorney relative to the proposed agreement between the City and
Orange County Water District setting forth the disposition of the City's
responsibilities in connection with Anaheim Lake, Councilman Seymour offered
Resolution No. 75R-540 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF AN AGREFRIENT WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT CONCERNING
CRILL BASIN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO F~XECUTE SAID AGREEMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL ME2~BERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL M~MBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL~ERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-540 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-541 - SUN FOOTBALL, INC. - LICENSE AGREEMENT: On report and
recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution
No. 75R-541 for adoption, approving the terms of a license agreement with Sun
Football, Inc. for rental of office space.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A~HEIMAPPROVING THE TERMS AND
CO~ITIONS OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH SUN FOOTBALL, INC., AND AUTtlORIZING THE
MAYOR A~ CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. {$2,500 per month, effective
date May 1, 1975)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEltERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL M~MBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL M~ERS: Pebley
The b~yor declared Resolution No. 75R-541 duly passed and adopted.
TRA~NSFER OF GOLF COURSES TO STADIUM AND CO~Eb~ION CENTER DEPARtmENT; In
accordance with action taken by the Council at the adjourned regular meeting
held October 2, 1975, Mr. Watts presented the resolution which would effect the
transfer of responsibility for the golf courses from the Parkm, Recreation and
the Arts Department to the Stadium and Convention Center Department. He
pointed out that this transfer includes the maintenance people involved on the
golf courses so that they would be under Mr. Liegler's jurisdiction.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-542; Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 75R-542
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TRANSFERRING THE DIVI-
SION OF GOLF COURSES FROM THE JURISDICTION OF THE PARKS, RECREATION AD~ THE
ARTS DEPAR~iENT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE STADIUM AND CON~ENTION CENTER
~EPARTMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
75-937
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 14~ .1.~75~ .1.~30 P.M.
A¥~Z.~: COUNCIL MF2[BERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL M~ERS: None
ABSEI,~f: COUNCIL M~-~BERS: Pebley
The P~yor declared Resolution No. 75R-542 duly passed and adopted.
AMERICAN LEGION POST NO. 72 - POSTING AND RETRIEVING OF FLAGS: Mrs. Roberts'
reported on the request submitted by the American Legion Anaheim Post No. 72
under date of September 18, 1975, that the City inspect the flag pole standards
located on Lincoln Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard and either replace or repair
these, and provide replacement flags for however many standards are made
usable. They wish to reactivate the contract between the City and the American
Legion Post No. 72 for posting and retrieving of colors on seven specified
holidays with an increase from $1.50 to $2.00 per flag.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-543: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-543 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHELM APPROVING THE TEPeeS AND
CONDITIONS OF AN AGREF~ENT WITH ANAHEIM POST NO. 72 AMERICAN LEGION CONCERNING
THE DISPLAY OF FLAGS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL M~ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL M~tBERS: None
ABSEnt: COUNCIL M~[BERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-543 duly passed and adopted.
MASTER PLAN OF BIKEWAYS: Mr. Dick Kamphefner submitted a Master Plan of Bikeways
for the City of Anaheim. He reported that the City has recently applied for
bicycle route funding in the amount of $64,000 under provisions of Senate Bill
No. 821. In order to receive approval of these or any amount of funds, a
Council approved Master Plan of Bikeways is necessary. He recommended that the
Council adopt the plan submitted, advising that it is a long-range, compre-
hensive plan which can be amended as necessary, to keep pace with om-going
needs. Once the plan is adopted, it will be printed and sent to the Advisory
Committee and SCAG for approval.
In answer to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Kamphefner advised that the $64,000
under current application is in addition to approximately $30,000 previously
approved for bicycle trail planning purposes.
Mr. Watts counseled that since this Master Plan of Bikeways is a
discretionary plan to be included in the City's General Plan, it would be
necessary to conduct public hearings prior to adoption of same. To date, no
such hearings have been held. He recommended, therefore, that should Council
wish to approve the b~ster Plan of Bikeways as submitted, they might do this
with the stipulation that it is approved for the sole purpose of submittal for
obtaining grant funds only.
MOTION: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council approved the Master Plan of Bikeways presented by the Parks, Recreation
and the Arts Department, for the purpose of grant application for obtaining
funds only. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-544 - AMEI,~}.[E}~ TO JAYCOX COntRACT: Councilman Seymour
offered Resolution No. 75R-544 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN ~E~MENT
TO CONTRACT FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF ' .... "~ - .~ ~ .. '~
BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ WARREN W. JAYCOX, Ai%~ PROVIDING FOR AN AUDIT TO SUB-
ST~TIATE COST INCREASE BY JAI~AllY 31, 1976. (increase of $.25 per unit
effective July 1, 1975)
75-938
City. H,a!l,.' Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October !,4, .1.975~..!:30. P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL M~ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL M~f~ERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MF~ERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-544 duly passed and adopted.
TP~CT NO. 8513 - GRADING PLA~.~: Mr. Maddox gave a verbal report on the problems
encountered by S.I.R. Development Company in connection with the grading plan
for Tract No. 8513 which is located north of Serrano Avenue and south of the
Walnut Canyon Reservoir. Mr. Lowry explained specifically that this particular
tract map was one of those which became void as a result of the new State
Subdivision Map Act and consequently had to be resubmitted. When resubmitted,
the grading plan became s~bject to the provisions of the City's Revised
Hillside Grading Ordinance and no longer was in full compliance.
Mr. Maddox explained that in three instances lot lines on the grading plan
for Tract No. 8513 are actually on the slope itself rather than at the top as
required in ~he Grading Ordinance; there are also three lots with lines on a
slope in similar fashion with a grade differential.
Mr. Watts stated that basically the developer is requesting the Council to
grant exceptions for these variances from the requirements set forth in the
Revised Hillside Grading Ordinance for a tract map which was already approved.
He advised that the Council does have the ability to grant these without public
hearing since this authority is built into the ordinance.
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City
Council approved the exceptions from the Grading Ordinance as outlined by the
City Engineer for Tract No. 8513. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
HEARINGS - NATIONAL FLOOD PROTECTION ACT: Councilwoman. Kaywood advised that a
hearing is planned on the National Flood Insurance and National Flood
Protection Act on October 17, 1975, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at Golden West
College.
Mr. Thompson advised that members of the Planning Department staff have
been involved with preparations for this event and do plan to attend.
APPOII~fMENT - LIBRARY BOARD: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by
Councilman Seymour, the City Council appointed Mr. Ralph I. Callen, B.B.C.
Building, Suite C, 2141 West La Palma, to the Anaheim Library Board of
Trustees, to fill the unexpired term of Reuben P. Hughes, said term ending June
30, 1979. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION C~RRIED.
ADJOUR~NT: Councilman Sneegas moved to adjourn. Councilwoman Kaywood .seconded
the motion. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 7: 18 P.M.
ALONA M. HOUGARD, CITY CLERK
Deputy