1975/10/3075-96!
City ttallm Anaheim~ California - COUi~CIL MINUTES - October 30~. 1975~ 3:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular
session.
PI~SE2IT: COUNCIL ~ERS: Kaywood, Sneegas and Thom
ABSENT: COUNCIL I,~I~ERS: Seymour and Pebley
PRESENT: INTERIH ASSISTA2]T CITY MAJ~AGER: William Griffith
CITY ATTO~{EY: Alan R. Watts
CITY CLERK: Alona 5I. Ilougard
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry O. McRae
SENIOR PERSONNEL ~L~YST: David Hill
A quorum having been established, Mayor Thom called the meeting
to order at 4:15
AG~',EEI. hEHTS - SALARY NEGOTIATIONS - Ai~AliEII~ POLICE A/~D FIRE ASSOCI~tTIONS:
I{r. ~,icRae reported that agreements have.been reached in salary negotiations
with the Anaheim Police and Anaheim Fire Associations. Ile outlined the Fire
Association agreement for an increase on October 17, 1~75 of 6~% for Fire
Fighter, Fire Engineer and related classes; 7½% for Captains and related
classes. This agreement further provides for a 4.1% increase on April 16, 1976
for Fire Fighter, Fire Engineer affd related classes and a 7.1% increase on that
date for Fire Captains and related classes.
The agreement with the Anaheim Police Association provides for an increase
effective October 17, 1975 of 7.~% for Patrolmen and related classes, as well
as for Sergeant and related classes. Additionally, the Police Association
Agreement calls for an increase on April 2, 1976 of 2.8% for Police Patrolmen,
Police Officer and related classes and an increase of 5.4% for Sergeant and
related classes.
}~ I.IcP, ae advised that resolutions have been prepared establishing the
rates effective October 17, 1975 for both Police and Fire Associations and that
resolutions effecting the increases in the Spring will be prepared for Council
adoption at that time. tlc pointed out that the resolution adopting the
increase for the Police Association may be adopted subject to ratification by
vote of the Anaheim Police Association membership.
RESOLUTION NOS. 75R-563 ~.~D 75R-564: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution
Nos. 75R-563 and 75R-564 for adoption, Resolution No. 75R-563 to be contingent
upon approval by the membership of the Anaheiu Police Association.
Refer to Resolution Book.
IIESOLUTIOi] NO. 75R-563 - POLICE ASSOCIATIO~ AGREEiLENT: A ~SOLUTION OF Ti~
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A~AIIEII.! ESTABLISHING PJkTES OF COi, R~ENSATION FOR JOB
CLASSES IiEPPdZSENTED BY THE Ai~AJIEI~'! POLICE ASSOCIATION, AUD SUPERSEDING
RESOLUTION i~O. 75R-71.
.RESOLUTIO!{.NO.. 75R-564 - FIRE ASSOCIATION AG~EiIEjT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ~AHEIM ESTABLISHING P~TES OF COMPENSATION FOR JOB
CLASSES REPRESEI~TED BY THE ~EIM FIRE ASSOCIATIO~, ~D SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION
NO. 74R-619.
?,oll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL ~IE~IBERS: Kaywood, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL ~¥~I'~]ERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL .~fBERS: Seymour and Pebley
The ~yor declared Resolution lies. 75R-563 and 75R-564 duly passed
and adopted.
CHA~;GES IN PERSONNEL RULES NOS. 5 A/~D 15: Mr. McRae reported that the
Agreements with the Anaheim Police and Fire Associations also contain a number
Of changes in personnel rules. He indicated that in most cases the Personnel
Department would prefer that the Council not adopt the rule changes at this
time, because these are still under discussion with the other employee
organizations. Mr. McRae reported that the modification to Rule No. 5 applies
to hours worked by Fire employees working on 24-hour shifts, and this agreement
?5-962
Cit7 iiall~ Anaheim~ California - COU~CIL }IINUTES - October 30s 1975~ 3:30 P.H.
ctxan(]es the description of hours worked from 36..3 hours to 36 ltours, Which is
I~lO~ ~ accurate·
~lodification of Personnel Rule No. 15 is applicable only in the Anaheim
Police Association agreement and it provides for a system wherein holiday pay
will not be paid during the pay period of the holiday, except at the request of
the eraployee. Holiday pay will be accumulated throughout the year, and the
el~ployee may take the holiday day off at a later time. If ]~oliday time is not
taken during that year, holiday pay will be paid the employee during the pay
period which includes December 1 of that year.
RESOLUTION NOS. 75~-565 AND 75R-566: Councilman Thom offered Resolution i~os.
7~,-565~'~ and ~=P~o ~-~66= for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
~,~oOLUTIO~I NO. 75~-~6~ - .:~:-,o ~,.~u RULE 5: A RLSOLUIIO,I ¢)~? THE CITY COUNCIL OF
TIE~ CITY OF Ai~II]I~i AZ[Ei~DING PZRSONi'~EL RULE 5, ilObqIS OF iIOi:lii Ai~D PAY DAY, A~.~D'
]IESCI~.q)Ii~G RESOLUTIOi~ I~OS. 73R-605 Ai'~D 74R-620.
XESOLUTION NO 75R-566 pv~ ,~
· - M,oO:L]EL RULE 15: A RESOLUTIOI,~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL
~)F T~{E CITY OF A~:A]IEIH A2IENDING PERSO!~NEL RULi] 15, HOLIDAYS, Ai,ID RESCII~DIi~C
iU]SOLUTIOi'~ ~0. 74R-55.
]~oll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL ~Z~.'~U3~..RS: Kaywood, Sneegas and Thom
]~OES: COUNCIL iIE]'.~ERS: None
ABSEiIT: COUNCIL ?iE..IBERS: Seymour and Pebley
The b~yor declared 'Resolution Nos. 75R-565 and 75R-566 duly passed
and adopted.
· '? ...... - tErROACIIVE TO OCTOBER 17;
SUBSE(~UEHT SALARY NEGOTIATION AGREE,4n~iS EFFECTIVE
1!)75: !~. ~.~cRae presented a resolution which provides that any agreement with
e~.q)loyee organizations reached prior to November 13, 1975 will be effective to
()ctober 17, 1975. Additionally, this resolution provides that any resolution
adopted during that time period would also be applicable for the unrepresented
classes of employees, effective October 17, 1 7~.9 =
i~yor Thom requested clarification as to what employees constitute tim
unrepresented classes and ~. HcRae outlined these and explained that this
resolution would not apply to any Department or Division lleads.
P~S()LUTION NO. 75R-567: Council~.~an Thom offered Resolution I~o. 75R-567 for
adoption with the stipulation that all Department and Division Heads be
excluded from the provisions of same.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTIO~I OF Tile CITY COUi~ICIL OF Tile CITY OF Ai'~AHEII[ PERTAI]i~Ii;G TO TIiE
EFiq~CTIVE DATE OF
()F Tifi] CITY OF
?,oll Call Vote:
AY];S: COUNCIL rlEABzRS: Kaywood, Sneegas and Thom
~IOES: COUNCIL ~[E~.~ERS: None
ABSiT. iT: COUNCIL ~".FCP[BERS: Seymour and Pebley
The .'layor declared Resolution No. 75R-567 duly passed and adopted.
Inspector Fossek representing the Anaheim Fire Association stated that his
organization and membership agree that the package offered by the City was a
very good one. lie hoped that future ne~Iotiations would be as productive.
:4ayor Thom stated that the attitudes of the Police and Fire Associations
in beinb the first organizations to cor~le to agreement are indicative of the
high caliber of personnel in these services, tie added that he was most
75-963
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 3.0~ 1975a 3:30 P.M.
appreciative of the efforts made by both the Police and Fire Associations with
regard to negotiations.
ACCEPTanCE OF DEED - RIVE?~ALE PAFd( CONDEMNATIOi~: l.~. Watts'reported that in
connection with the condemnation settlement authorized at the Council meeting
of September 9, 1975, the City Attorney's Office is now in a position to
recon~end acceptance of the deed.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-568: Councilwoman Ka~ood offered Resolution No. 75R-568
for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A i:ESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COU~'~CIL OF THE CITY OF Ai~AHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS
AIID ORDERING T~tEIR RECORDATION. (Eugene L. Davis, Executor; Verle Boyer
Chambers, Executrix)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL [fEMBERS: Kaga~ood, Sneegas and Thom
~.~OES: COUNCIL i[EI~h~ERS: None
ABSEiIT: COUNCIL ~[EI, IBERS: Seymour and Pebley
The l~yor declared Resolution No. 75R-56[~ duly passed and adopted.
RIVERDALE PARK CA2~CELLATION OF COUi~TY T~<ES: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood,
seconded by Councilman Thom, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was
requested to cancel County taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim
for municipal purposes, pursuant to Resolution No. 75R-568, acquired from
Eugene L. Davis and Verle Boyer Chambers. Councilmen Se~nour and Pebley
absent, ~TION CARRIED.
z~)JOU?d~ENT: Councilman Sneegas moved to adjourn. Councilman Thom seconded the
motion. Councilmen Seyraour and Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 4: 25 P.I.~.
City Clerk