Loading...
1975/12/1675-1089 City tta..ll; 7u'~aheim; California - COUJCIL MINUTES - December 1.6~ 1975~ 1:30 P.?l. The City Council of the City of Ana;~eim met in regular session. Pi~SCJY: COUNCIL ~ID~llS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom A~SiJi~T: COUNCIL ~[E:IBEI.IS: i~one ~'XESEI;T: ~HINIST~TIVE ASSIST~'4T: Jolm l~rding CITY ATTOPJ~EY: Alan R. Watts CITY CLEFd~: Alone ~i. iiougard DEPUTY CITY CLI]~IX: Linde D. Roberts PL~%~NING DIRECTOR: Ronald Thompson ASSIST~T DIRECTOR, PLanNING: Don McDaniel ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti FIRE CHIEF: James Riley CITY ENGINEER: James P. Haddox POLICE DCPA~ITiH~i~T, Lt. ,'~orman Cook '~yor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed ti~ose in attendance to the Council meeting. Ii~OCATION: ~everend John Seville of St. ~'{ichael's Episcopal Church save Invo cat ion. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman John Seymour led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. i'tiESZi~TATION TO LEONAi'd) S~.{ITiI: ,~hyor Thom presented a framed, full color pl~otograph of the Anaheim Stadium to ~,tr. Leonard Smith in recognition and appreciation of his years of service on the Anaheim Stadium Corporation Board of Directors since its inception in 1964. ?Ir. Smith accepted with a brief statement of thanks. liIJUTES: tlinutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular ~Ieetings held November 4, and 11, 1975 and Adjourned Regular Heeting held November 13, 1975, were approved, subject to typographical corrections, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilrman Sneesas. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF i'dZ,~ADING - OllDINA/~CES A~D..RESOLUTI()~'~S: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to waive the reading in full of' all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. ~iOTION Ui~Ag~IHOUSLY CARRIED. ;I]~t'ORT - FINANCIAL DE~I~DS AGAI~ST ThE CITY: Demands against the City in the ~m~ount of $490,920.97, in accordance with the 1975-76 Budget, were approved. MULTIHODAL GROUP LEASE - STADIUM PROPERTY: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded' by Councilman Seyuour, the City Council continued decision on the request of Mr. Norman Smedegaard, Attorney for Multimodal Group, Inc., regarding the execution of a lease for City property located near the Anaheim Stadium, to the meeting of December 23, 1975. MOTION CARRIED. AGtlEE~CNT ~;ITII COUNTY OF OIQ~,IGE Ai~D ~AliEIM i~Hi~ORIAL ttOSPITAL - PARA~IEDIC SERVICES: Fire Chief James Riley reported that the proposed agreemen: presented this date is an outgrowth of the proposal received in April of 1974 from Anaheim ~'!emorial Hospital, who has expressed a strong desire to provide this service until the City can get their units into stree~ operation, In accordance wi~h this proposal~ funds were incorporated into the Budget to accomraodate the one full year program. Chief Riley advised that pursuant to this proposed agreement one paramedic unit would be provided which would be housed at the Anaheim Memorial Hospital and controlled by the Anaheim Fire Department Co~mnunication Center. This unit would be staffed with paramedic-trained nurses who would normally be on duty in the hospital emergency room. The contract expires at the time that the City's second paramedic unit goes into service, which should be approximately December 31, 1976. The contract agreement further provides for a $150 paymen~ per call with a ~aaximum monthly, rate of $1~),0~!], or $100,000 in the 12-month period. Due to the existing tine frar~e, Chief Riley advised it is unlikely tha~ the contract will be in effect for one full year and consequently the $100,000 75-1090 City ,lall~ Anaheim~ California - COU~CIL MINUTES - December 16~ 1975~ 1:30 P.~I. budgeted for this purpose should be more than adequate to cover She coats of the first year paramedic program. The hospital will provide full til~e, 24-hour service for the life of the contract. in response to Coumcilr~mn Sey~aour, Chief ~liley ext~lained that the charge for a "no service" call was included to provide for ti~ose situations in wl~ich a unit arrives on the scene go find that there is no need for paramedic services. It was felt that it would be more appropriate to pay $50 for these calls rather than the $150 charge. Councilman Sey~,~our questioned What Fire Chief Riley would consider to be a reasonable per call cost figure for the City once tl~ey take over the program. Chief Riley felt that rather the City should determine wl~ether or not this service is a governmental function such as other public safety services pro- vided by Police and Fire Departments, and then determine what is the cost per unit per year. On the current market a paramedic unit costs approximately $125,000 per year. Councilman Seymour stated that going into this program he realized ti'tat some of the cities already into paramedics have discovered that it costs more money than they had anticipated and they subsequently have had to increase tax rates, etc. lie remarked that it is his concern, now that the City of Anaheim is embarking on this much needed service, how far the City should go into sub- sidizing the costs for this type of service. He suggested that the Council might consider the establishment of some minimum fee on a per call basis for the service, using hypothetically the figure of $25. He remarked that such a per call fee would, in his opinion, accomplish two tilings: 1) help to recoup so~,~e of the costs for the operation of the paramedics program; and 2) it would preclude to some extent the unnecessary calling of the paramedic units for those medical emergencies which could be treated in a hospital emergency room or by private physician. Councilman Seymour cautioned however t]~at he wisl~ed to be certain that a citizen who could not afford the $25 fee would still be served in time of emergency. He concluded that the City should attempt to compose some legisla- tion which could accomplish these things as he felt it important that the citizens realize this type of service is not available for free, that it does cost the governmental body to operate it. ~[ayor Thom concurred with Coancilman Seymour's remarks and further indi- cated that he feels paramedic services to be analogous to police and fire ser- vices and that these should rightly be assumed by the municipal government, tie stated that he believed a formula has to be developed to implement a set of charge backs for paramedic services to prevent abuses as have been experienced by other communities, lie advised that he did not believe the charge back formula need be devised prior to entering into the proposed agreement with the County and Anaheim f~emorial Hospital. In response to Coancil questions about expected frequency of use of the progra~.~, Chief Riley advised that the Fire Department receives 170 medical aid calls per :aonth average and of these at least 100, he would estimate, would require paramedic services. He advised that the Police Department currently answers ~mny, many medical aid calls and transfers those that are critical to the Fire Department. He emphasized that the purpose of tile paramedic program is to stabilize the patient in trauma, lie advised that there are mocial i,,q~lications inasmuch as a good number of medical aid calls are from the lower income bracket and 13% to 20% of the County-wide paramedic calls are from ghose over age 65. The Council will therefore be faced with the decision as to whether or not they wish to charge these people; how tile charge back would be collected; or do they wish to exempt certain people. Brief discussion was held regarding the current payment situation on ~,lbulance services, and Mr. Watts advised that certainly one of the things wt~ich will have to be accomplished by staff would be to check with other governmental agencies such as the Orange County :iedical Center as to how they handle charges for emergency transportation. Prior to finalization of the proposed agreement, Mr. Watts suggested that the word "on" preceding a blank space at the end of Line No. 7 be removed and 75-1091 C. ity Jiali~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 16m 1975~ 1:30. P.M. the phrase "within 15 days after hospital personnel are certified pursuant to Section i~o. 10" be inserted. i',lr. Paul O'Neal, Director of Long Kange Planning for Anaheim blemorial liDs?itel, 1111 West La falr~m, was in the Council Chamber representin~ the hospital and advised that they feel they will be prepared to put the unit into operation in about April of 1976. ~i£SOLUTION NO. 75R-645: At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution I.~o. 75R-645 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TIiE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF ~d~AHEI~,I APPROVING TIHZ TEP~',~ AND CONDITIONS OF A2~ AGREEliENT BETWEEN Tt~ CITY OF ~'~AiiEIM ~D Ti~ COUNTY OF O}~GE ~D Tile ~IEIM I~MORI~ ilOSI'IT~ RELATING TO P ~ ' A~RLDIC SERVICES ~D AUTiiORIZING Tile b~YOR ~'O Tile CITY CL~kK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREI~I'~i'~T ON BCH~F OF · ~ CITY OF ~b~IEIll. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL ?[EILBERS: Ka~;ood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneesas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL ~.LE~IBERS: None ABSENT; COUNCIL I.[E~.LBERS: None The ilayor declared Resolution No. 75R-645 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Sneegas left the Council Chamber. (2:45 P.M.) iIOTION: Councilman Seymour moved that City staff be directed to research and report back to Council with a recommended plan for minimum charge backs for paramedic services as outlined above. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. Councilman Sneegas temporarily absent. MOTION CARRIED, Councilman Sneegas returned to the Council Chamber. (2:46 P.M.) CONTINU.ED PUBLIC HEARING - A~.~ENO~'LENT TO CONDITION NO. 1 OF RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-61: '.'irs. ~.~2rJorie Mize LeGaye, Attorney for the ~ t~IcJees, requested an additional one-week continuance to work out some matters with the City Engineering Division which was granted on motion by Councilra.~n Seyraour, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTIOi; CARRIED. P_UBLIC i~EARING - CONDITIOi~AL U~E FEi~IIT NO. 1562: Pursuant to the written request dated December 4, 1975, from Itt. John Hillick, Vice President, Anaheim ~iills, Inc., for a 30 day continuance on the public hearing for Conditional Use Permit Uo. 1562, tile Council on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley continued said public hearing to the meeting of January 20, 1976. :{OTION CARRIED. JUVEJILE DIVERSION PROJECT: lit. John Itarding reported that a request was received from Chief Bastrup of the Anaheim Police Departmen~ :hag tile City Council consider entering into a six-month juvenile pre-trial diversion project with tile City of Garden Grove, to run from January to June of 1976. The cost to the City of Anaheim would be $750 to participate in this Federally funded program which is already on-going in Garden Grove. It would provide for two counselors from the Psychology Department of U. C. Irvine to counsel juveniles referred to them by the Anaheim Police Department prior to trial. Lt. Norman Cook of the Anaheim Police Department explained that this program is designed to divert juveniles away from the criminal justice system and is an attempt to reduce the population in Juvenile l{all. The program addresses those juveniles who are truants, runaways or considered incorrigible, i.e., tile type of crime which would not be considered a crime if the individual were an adult. l)r. Arnold Binder, Professor at U. C. Irvine and Director of the Garden Grove Juvenile Diversion Project, explained that four professional counselors are involved in the project, all with ~iaster Degrees, and that they primarily counsel Section 601 offenders but also accept Section 602 cases depending upon what tile Police Department refers. 75-1092 City Hall) Anaheim) California - COUf~CIL :[INUTES - Dece~er 16) 1975) 1:30 P.M. T~le Program provides an alternative for tl~ese juveniles, which Or. Binder reported had a 48% recidivism reduction according to tile control group comparison, lie advised that the program will be funded through tI~e Criminal Justice Council in the amount of $15,1)00. Tile $750 requested of tt~e City of Anaheim is the 5% matching funds required, lie reiterated tibet the program expires in June, 1976 and advised that the counselors are employees of U. C, Irvine and as such, the City will have no additional employees on their ha~ds at contract termination. >~r. iiarding advised that a request was included in the Police Department ~e~.~orandum for the $750 m~tching funds to be appropriated from the Co~ncil Contingency Fund, but that the ~ianager's Office has requested this sum be found in the Police Department Budget. RESOLUTIOi~ i;O. 75R-646: Councilwo~n Kaywood offered Resolution ilo. 75R-646 for adoption, approving an agreement between t~m Cities of Anaheim and Garden Grove pertaining to participation in a juvenile diversion counseling project through U. C. Irvine. [lefer to Resolution Book. A iIESOLUTION OF Tile CITY COUi~CIL OF T~[E CITY OF A~A]iEI:<[ APPROVIi[G Ai~O AUTiiORiZiNG Tile FARTICIPATIOi~ OF TiiE CITY OF ANAiLEIiI WITH Tile CITY OF GARDEN GROVE IN THE JUVENILE PRE-TRIAL DIVERSIOi~ PROJECT ~jO AUTtlORIZIiIG THE EXPE~]DI- 'fU~E OF FUNDS Iii' SUPPORT TiiF, KEOF. (City's cost - $750) ](oll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL ?H],IBERS: Ka)~ood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom i,~'(.)ES: COUNCIL i','~i[BERS: None ABSEi;T: C(}Ui.~CIL i-'~iiBERS: None The l~yor declared Resolution !.~o. 75R-646 duly passed and adopted. iIEt)ORT - ~)ISPOSITIO~ OF PAi~iIXG TICi.~TS: ?~r. Watts reported that in accordance with direction given by Council at their meeting held Dece~aber 9, 1975, the series of parking citations issued in the area of Chevy Chase, Bluejay and Wren Streets, beginning November 29, 1975, have been dismissed. He reported that there were considerably more than 3i'} or 4() citations involved. Pi]~'.[ISSIOi; T(') IiSi] CITY FLOAT: ,'tr. Watts recalled t~at the Council recently apl)roved the use of t]~c City-built float by the First Christian Church, subject to certain temns and conditions, lie advised that he has received notification from the ~{everend Ragon Flannery that because of extenuating circumstances, the Ci~urch will not be able to proceed as they had anticipated. AUTilO[tIZATIOI] FOR SUBSTITUTE CO~TIhICTOR - UTILITIES SERVICE Ci.'NTEil PHASE IV: fir. Watts reported that request has been received from Contracting Services, tl~e contractor responsible for the Phase IV reconstruction at the Utilities Sera, ice Center to add a subcontractor - bi. E. ilarner and Son Construction Company, 16515 Plur, uaer Street, Sepulveda, California. On ~.~otion by Councilnmn Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council approved the addition of M. E. Harmer and Son Construction Company to the authorized list of subcontractors for the Phase IV Utilities Service CenSer Remodeling Project. i.~TION CARRIED. tlEPO,~IT Oil ELECTION PROCEDURES: Memorandum from Alona M. iIougard, City Clerk, dated December 5) 1975, pertaining to election procedures in the forthcoming municipal election, April 13, 1976, was submitted. Said memorandum contained the following recommendations: 1. that each Candidate's Statement be li~ited to 200 words and that each Candidate availing himself of this service be billed the actual pro-rated cost of printing, handling and translation; 2) that inclusion of "other materials" in the required mailing to each voter be prohibited; and 3) that the $25 filing fee imposed pursuant to Section 1.12.090 of tile Anaheim Municipal Code be retained. In reply to Councilwoman Ka.vwood's question as to whether any other cities have per~:~itted materials to be mailed with t]~e sample ballot, ~s. Hougard 75-1093 City .dall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL ML~UTES - December 16~1975m 1:30 P.M. explained that this is the first year this has been permitted by the Elections Code and that none of tile cities conducting elections in ~rCll are permitting the extra nmterials to be included in the sample ballot ~ailing. She further explained that if the Anaheim City Council chooses to allow a candidate to include this nmterial, they would then have to establish regulations as to the ~ize and weight of same and also determine whether or not to pass on the cost of additional postage. During brief discussion, Council Members indicated they did not feel it appropriate to include these other materials in the mailing with the sample ballot, and also concurred with the renminder of the City Clerk's recom- mendations. Discussion was held regarding the fact that it is no longer permissible for the City to require ~he $500 deposit for Candidate's 8tagement expenses, It was explained that only tl~e actual pro-rated cost of printing, translation, and handling can be billed to the candidate, once these are available. Council ~embers were concerned that these bills, if received after election day, would be less likely to be paid. The City Clerk advised that the statements are translated and forwarded to t}~e printer the day after the close of the nomination period and ~he billing information is available prior to election day. A Candidate's Statement cannot t]~en be withdrawn and would have to be included with the sample ballot whether or not the candidate has paid for same. At the conclusion of Council discussion, by general consent the City Attorney's Office was directed to prepare a resolution containin~ some method to collect the pro-rated costs of Statements from the candidate for Council consideration on or before January 6, 1976. >~. Watts further requested clarification from Council Members as ~o whether or not they intended to include on the April, 1976 Ballot the proposed Charter Amendment developed by the Task Force appointed by the City Council and presented to Council at the meeting of June 24, 1975. He advised that up to this point he has assumed that Council would not want to place ~hls i~em on the ballot with the anticipated recommendation from the Anaheim Chamber of Con~aerce and Task Force on Utilities which is considering the possibill:y of a Public Utilities Cormmission for the City Utilities Department. Councilman Seymour stated that while he agrees the effects of a Charter A~]endment to insure that profits realized from generation projects be passed onto consumers in the form of lower rates would not be realized un~il some time in the future, he was of the opinion that the issue should be placed on tile next ballot so it is not one of those issues which is put aside and forgotten. i.ks. Hougard reported to Council Members that she intended to again use the punch ballot machines and card ballot system for the April, 1976 election. Further the Federal Voting Ri8hts Act requires that the ballots be prin:ed in both English and Spanish. further action taken by Council at this time. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-647 - BALL-FREE.WAY Ai~NEXATION ~UNINi.IABITED~.' Pursuant to authority granted by the Local Agency Formation Commission, Resolution No. 75'- 141, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 75R-647 for adoption. i%efer to Resolution Book. A Ri]SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Ai~AiiEIM APPROVING THE TION TO TIlE CITY OF ANAIIEII{ OF THE TERRITORY Ki~O~ Ai~O DESIGNATED BALL-FREEWAY ~NEXATION. ~oll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~one ABSENT: COUNCIL b~EIiBERS: None The l.~yor declared Resolution No. 75R-647 duly passed and adopted. 75-1094 .City ~iall~ Anailcim~ California - COUHCIL HIi;UTdS - ;}ccember 16~ 1975~ 1:30 }.'.ii. JOI;~T ~JLTIi.~G - LIB~IA~i'f BOARD: Communication from Mrs. Elizabeth Schultz, Chairman of the Anaheiia Librarv fioard, suggesting January 7, 1976, at 3:00 in the ]~ibrary ~:lultipurpose ~Ioo~.~ as tl~e ti~e and date for a joint meeting i~etween the Library Loar~! and City Council, was submitted. Council ,leiabers indicated the date and time to be agreeable and directed that ins. Schultz be so notified. Rt,iI~iJEST FOR COHSULTAiIT PROPOSALS: (Anaheim Intracity Transportation System a~d l~isneyland/Convention Center to Do~ttow~ Feeder - Connector Link) Tile request for con~ultant proposals for a feasibility study of a feeder/connector transportation system was continued pending refinements to be submitted, pursuant to action taken by the Co~maunity Development Co~maission ti~is date regarding tile Hulti~aodal Transportation Center, on motion by Councilman r;e~',~our, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. i-IOTIOI~ CARRIED. SA~:TA ANA ~',IVEt'I/S~M~TIAGO CiIEEK GREE,~B£LT II. iPLE:[~,~fATIO~ PLAil~ P..~kSE I: On ~aotion bv Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council approved the boundaries for the Greenbelt Corridor and impact area as recoup- mended by tile Santa Aha River/Santiago Creek Greenbelt Connaission in accordance with recommendation by the Anaheim City Planning Department. IR)TION CARRIED. '"l~ REVISION i~O. 1 - RE~UESTED £U.'[E~O~fE~T TO COi4DITIO~-~ HO. 14: TIP\CT NO. o)82~ Submitted for Coun'cil consider'jtion was "rePort f"~'om the City Engineer reco~a- mending that Condition ~4o. 14 of Tract Ho. ~032, Revision No. 1 be revised to read as follows: that the tract developer si~all place one-half (1/2) the volame of the ultimate erabankment for Fai~n~ont Boulevard concurrently wit~ tl~e develop~aent of the tract. (The City of Anaheim s~all be responsible for installing tl~e balance of the e~abankment, landscaping and irrigation facilities and the street improvements in that portion of Fairmont Boulevard to be con- ~tructed on the above ~entioned embank~aent at such ti~ae as said improvements are necessary.) Hr. ~addox reported that tile remainder of this embankment is proposed as one of the City's A.fi.F.P. projects ~nder the 1966-67 program. On motion by Councilman Seyn~our, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council approved the revision to Condition No. 14 of Tract iqo. 80~2, Revision ~o. 1, as reco~mnended by tile City Engineer and shown above. HOTIO~i CARRIEO. OfiSIG,~ATIOfi ~F tiEALTt£ fiYST£Hfi PL~-~Y~I~G AGE~GY FOR Oi~t~'i(3J~ COU~{TY; The booklet of ~mterials to be used by the County of Orange in seeking designation as the Health Systems t'lanning f~gency for Orange County was submitted for Council con- sideration. fir. Bill Daly, the City's representative to the Orange County liealth Planning Council addressed the City Council an~ advised that con~aunity groups in the County of Orange will have an opportunity to help decide which of two agencies, the County Board of Supervisors or the Orange County Healt~ Planning Council, will perforza a more objective, impartial job of health planning. He advised that more than 50 co~nunity groups, including the City of Anaheim, have previously endorsed the ~iealth Planning Council. Hr. Oaly stated that one of the chief reasons in support of the iiealth ]~lanning Council as the designated Health Systems Planning Agency is that this Agency when designated will have tile responsibility of review and approval or disapproval of applications for health funds. The County Supervisors are the ~aost frequent applicants for these funds and therefore, in his opinion, this constitutes a conflict of interest on t]~eir part. ~ir. Daly submitted some ~aterial prepared by the Executive Director of the ilealt;~ ]~lanning Council sl~owing a comparison between what the Board of fiupervisors can offer and what t!~e ]iealth Planning Council has accon~plished in pas t. In sunm~ation, b~. Daly advised that the liealth Planning Council is t:~de up of consu~aers and providers as well as interested citizens. Presently there are 75 citizens represented on the Council from t~ro~ghout Orange County. 75-1095 City liall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 16; 1975; 1:30 P.M. :Ir. Stau Hatek, Executive Director of the itealti~ Planning Council sub- r:~itted additional n~aterial for Council review, ile advised tl~at this material includes information on the structure, budget, work program, election process, and how citizens are involved with the work of the Healtt~ Planning Cou~¢il. advised that the position paper submitted states very directly why the tleaith Planning Council feels this particular function should be k¢l*g ou~ of political arena. In conclusion, Mr. Ilatek stated that they would like to be notified when this matter is rescheduled for Council decision. Mayor Thom suggested that the decision on thi~ ~mtter be deferred for a period of time to permit the Council Members time to review what has been sub- mitted prior to either reaffirming or changing their position on the designation of the Health Systems Planning Agency for the County. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council continued their action on the re-endorsement of their position or cl~ange in position concerning the designation of the agency to be the Systems Planning Agency for Orange County to the meeting of December 30, 1975. iIOTIOi~ C~dlRIEO. TEf[PO~kRY - RAYIlOi~D FLOOD COi~TRi!L....RETA]~)ING BASIN: l.~r. Wat;s repor;~d ;ha; in connection with the development of T'ract No. 8~66, Revision No. 1, in order to provide temporary relief to the anticipated drainage problem un~il comple;ion of the storm drain in La Palma, it is proposed to provide a temporary inlet (curb cut) into the Raymond Flood Control Retarding Basin. In exchange, a~ a consideration, the City would agree to hold tile Flood Control District l~armless from any damage which flood waters might cause to ghe retarding basin. l~r. ~,~ddox reported that this is a temporary si;uation and ;here is v~ry minimum risk that any damage would occur from flood waters. 1LE8OLUTION NO. 75ii-643: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 75R-643 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A iiESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUi~CIL OF TeE CITY OF AN~iEIi~! APFROVING Ai~ A(;REE],[ENT WITli TliE COUNTY OF OP~GE FOR FLOOD CO~TROL CO~:~o~RUC~IO~ AT T'i~ I~4ONO RET~DIi;G BASIN ~i) AUTiiORIZIi;G THE CITY ~AGjiR ~%~i) CITY CLE~hl TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEiUii~T. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEiIBERS'. Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Snee8as and Thom ~OES: COUNCIL ?~'IBER$; None ,~"~' COUi~CIL :.~-[~ERS: i~one The' !~yor declared Resolution No. 75R-648 duly passed and a~op~e~, CONSENT CALENDAR ITEl, IS: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Gounciimau ]'ebley, tile f0'llo'wing actions were aut]~orized in accordance with the reports and reconnnendatlons furnished each Council ,~emb~r and as lis~ed on ~he Consent Calendar Agenda: 1. CLAI:IS AGAINST TiiE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred tO tile insurance carrier: a. Claim submitted by Katherine Chew for injuries purportedly sustained as a result of condition of floor at ~aheim Stadium, on or about September 3, 1975. b. Claim submitted by Steve Van Hoff for injuries purportedly sustained as a result of actions of Anaheim Police Officer, on or about September 13, 1975. c. Claim submitted by John Reid for damages purportedly sustained as a result of collision with City vehicle, on or about November 26, 1975. 2. DINi~ER-DANCING ~O A~S~IENT DEVICES PERMITS: The following permits were granted subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police: 75-1096 ~..ity .liall~ ~hlaheim~ California - COUNCIL Mi~U'f~S - December 16~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. a. i)inner-Dancing Place t'er~it to allow dancing Tuesday throug~ Saturday from 9:~)() p.m. to 1:30 a.~,~ at La l'osada Restaurant, 1050 West Katelia Avenue. (Walter ~leister, Applicant) b. Dinner-t)ancing Place Permit to allow dancing nigl~tiy from ~:30 p.l.~, to l:J0 a.m. at the Essex Ar~.~s Restaurant, 2916 West Lincoln Avenue. (i'iichael i-lud~ryan, Applicant) c. Amusement Devices Permit to allow one juke box at Royal Arci~er Oar, J15 3outh Brookhurst Street. (Edward D. Elmore, Applicant) 3. CO}~{ESt'ONOENCE: The followin~ correspondence was ordered received and filed: a. Before the PUC - Application of Greyhound Lines, Inc., for an order authorizing a statewide increase in intrastate passenger fares and express rates and Greyhound Lines, Inc., Las Ve~as - Tonopah - Reno Stage Line, Inc., Orange Belt Stages, a corporation, Peerless Stages, Inc., and Vaca Valley Bus Lines for an order authorizing a statewide increase in interline express rates. b. ICC Resolution Service. c. City of Garden Grove - Resolution i~o. 4922-75 - liequesting the Orange County i;oard of Supervisors to establish a county service area in unincor- porated areas of the County. d. Canyon Area General Planning Task Force - ~.{inutes - £'~ovember 25, 1975. e. PAC (Alpha) - tiinutes - £~ovember 11, 1975. f. Financial and operating report for the ~aontl~ of November, 1975, for tl~e Building Division. ii~iCESS: by general consent, the Council recessed for five minutes· (3:40 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: i~ayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Merabers of the City Council being present· (3:45 P.~[.) ?~ESOLUTIOI~ .IDS. 75R-649 T~iOUGi~ 75R-652: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution i~os. 75~-649 through 7oR-~o~ for adoption in accordance with the reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Hember and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. ]~efer to Resolution Book. · . , ~ · E~ ' rr~ / ~ ~tESOLUTI(L~ .~O 75R-64~ -DEEOS OF E~LSE~',~.~'f: A ~'~OLU~IO~ OF T~£E CITY COUNCIL OF Tike CITY OF ~AilEIi[ ACC~JPTIi~G DEEDS A~i) O]iDE~Ii~G TiYEIR RECORDATIONS. (Paul ~obert Suder, et ox.; Roy Van Horne, et ux.; Imperial Properties; Kenneth ilobert Trimble, et ux., et al.; Rosen~ary J. Reeves; William C. Vallade, et ux.; Elwood ~.I. Proud, et ux.; Lauretta Bradford; Bernice Jeannette Swain; Perry L. Curtis, et ux.) ~SOLUTION i~O. 75R-650 - WO!~i ORDER ~O. 9995: A iIESOLUTIO~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~'~7dlI]I.~.! FiNDIi~G A~D DETEI~{I~Ii~G ThAT PUBLIC COi~VLi~IEi~CE ~D i;ECESSITY ~iEQUII~ T~[E COi~STRUCTIO~{ A~{D CO~R~LETIO~.~ OF A PUBLIC I~,~ROVEIL~NT TO ~7IT: POLICE BUILi)II.~G COf~PLi]TIOi~ OF SECO~{D FLOOR~ 425 SOUTd ibkRDOR BOUL~VA~, Ii~ TiiE CITY OF z~AHEIi{, WOiGi ORDER i~O. 9995; ~PROVING THE DESIGNS, PL~4S, PRO- FILES, D]bkWIi]GS ~D SPLCIFICATIOI~S FOR T~lE COi~STRUCTIOi; TiiEREOF; AUT~ORIZI~G TIlE COi~STRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC I~'~ROVE~T I~ ACCOI~CE WITH SAID SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; ~ID AUTi~ORIZIi~G ~D DI~CTII,~G THE CITY CLE~ TO PUBLiSii A I~OTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR T~{E CO~4STRUCTION Ti~EI~OF. (Bids to be Opened - January 15, 1976, 2:0~) P.H.) RESOLUTION ~.]0. 75R-651 - FINAL ACCEPTA~,~CE,. wePt[ ORDER i;O. 716-B: A RESOLUTIO~ OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF TliE CITY OF A~Ai~EI.',~! FINALLY ACCEPTIi4G TtiE CObH?LETION Ai~D TI~E ~UiG~ISHIi-~G OF ALL PLAinT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS Ai~D EQUIPMENT A/~D ALL UTILITIES A~D T]LAZ~SPORTATIO~ I:~CLUDIi~G POWER, FUEL Ai~D WATER, Ai~D TBE PERFOR- .~tAi~CE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CO~STRUCT Ai'~D CO,~iPLETE T~IE FOLLOWING PUBLIC If.fl?ROVE~.~Ei~T, TO WIT: INSTALLATIO[~ OF TtLAFFIC SIGNALS Ai~D SAFETY LIGHTING AT Tile INTERSECTION OF EUCLID STREET A~O ROik~£YA DRIVE (WEST SIDE), IN T~IE CITY OF ~fh~EI~!, WORIi O?d)ER NO. 716-B. (C. T. & F. Inc.) I(ESOLUTiON i~O. 75R-652 - FIi~AJ~ ACCEPTANCE~ WORK OtlDER NO. 853: A RESOLUTIOi~ OF TltL CITY COU:~CIL OF THI~ CITY OF Ai4futEIil FL~ALLY ACCEPTING Tale COb~?LETIOi~ Ai~D Yii~ ~]Ji'.~.~ISHI~G OF ALL PLA~T, LA~OR, SERVICES, i~5tTLRIALS Ai~D EQUIPMENT AND AL~ 75-1097 City iiall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 16~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. UTILITIES ;2~D TRAi4SPORTATION Ii'~CLUDI~4G POWER, FUEL A~4D WATER, A~4D ThE PERFOR- ~taiiCE OF ALL WOIIK N£CESSARY TO CO,~STRUCT f~D CO~LETL T~II~ FOL,,OWING PUBLIC II'[PROVE~J~T, TO WIT: SE~IOR CITIZEf~'S BUILDIi~G Ali( CONDITIO~Ii~G, 222 E. Ci[ARTFd~S STREET, IN Tile CITY OF Ai~fulEIM, WORii ORDER NO. 853. (Artic Refrigeration & Air Conditioning, Inc) (The City Engineer reported that the contract amount was $50,000 and there were no change orders filed.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL i~ltBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom :~u~o: COUNCIL ~BERS: ~one AOSENT: COUNCIL ~I~BERS: None The ~yor declared Resolution Nos. 75R-649 through 75R-652, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. 1976-77 ARTERIAL tiIGlfWAY FINAi;CING Pi{OGRA2~ PROJECTS; (Removed from Consent Calendar for discussion.) Submitted was report from the City Engineer dated December 8, 1975 describing the proposed 1976-77 A.It.F.P. projects located at: a) Orangewood Avenue from i~]inth Street to Euclid Street; b) Lakeview Avenue from l'~ohl ~{anch Road to South City Limits; c) Fairmont Boulevard from lliverside freeway to ~300 feet north of Santa Aha Canyon Road; d) Euclid Street from the Riverside Freeway to La Paisa Avenue. ~ir. Y. F. ifammatt, 1540 West Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim, was recognized by the ~ayor and remarked that in order to accomplish the proposed s~ree~ widenin~ adjacent to his property it will be necessary to move one structure as well as a considerable amount of trees and s,~rubbery, iie questioned the amount allocated for this entire project, notiug that he had a landscape contracting esti~mte on the movin~ of his plants and shrubbery which was $26,650 jus~ for that portion of the project, lie indicated that it might also be necessary to raove the second residential structure located on ]~is property. He remarked that his primary concern is that an insufficient amount of money is being 'budgeted to accomplish the various portions of ~he project. ~. ~addox referred to his supplemental repor~ on the Orangewond Avenue Street Widening Project dated December 11, 1975, which recommends that this be submitted as a right-of-way acquisition project, and ~hat construction be planned for 1977-78 which would include storm drain, house moving, as well as curb and gutter installation. Mr. Maddox reported that the right-of-way acquisition cost is estimated to total $132,000, which would be equally shared by the City and A.H.F.P. program. ~. Maddox explained that the figures presented by Hammatt referred to work sheet estimates for the construction project and would not be valid any longer,'since the construction is not proposed in the forthcoming fiscal year. P~. ~iammatt stated that he is not opposed to ti~e project but wishes to preserve the plants, shrubbery and structures on his proper~y and therefore was concerned that these other costs attendant to street widening are taken into consideration. ~r. A1 Seiler, 1628 West Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim, stated that he is also one of the property owners who would be affected by the Orangewood Avenue Street widening project. He remarked that the original plan for this project was agreeable to him, however he would like to see plans made for the entire project and further felt that all construction should be performed at once, including the storm drains, ile noted that removal of parking as proposed creates a hazard for the children living in the area. Mr. Seiler stated that he was opposed to the street widening project inso- far as it would increase the traffic on Orangewood Avenue, particularly since there is no crossing guard in this vicinity to cross the children to the school bus stop. In response to Councilman Seymour, Mr. Seiler stated that he had purchased l~is property two years ago and was aware at the time of purchase that the street would be widened, however he expected that a complete plan for the 75-1098 Ci[y Hall.~ Anahei[~ California - COU~CIL ,~tIi'~UTJJS - December 16~ 1975~ 1:..30 P.;.I. project would be presented and that better protection would be afforded to the families still living on that street. [[r. '~[addox further e×plai~md that at the informational meeting tile resi- dents living on the north side of Orangewood objected to ti~e relocation of tl~e curb as it was pro?oscd since it would bring tl~c traffic closer ~o their home~, i~ut subsequent to that it was ascertained they would be agreeable to parking restrictions and it was detemnined to widen the street to four travel lanes by leaving the curb as it was but removing parking. However ti~e people on the south side of Oransewood wl~o would have dedicated property, felt they st~ould be entitled to parking adjacent to their homes. It was for tills reason that it was determined to submit the project for right-of-way acquisition only in the co~aing fiscal year. .'~r. David ;~eals, 1572 West Orangewood Avenue, stated that he is in favor of the street widening project, ile felt this is tile reasonable time to accon~plish the project inasn~uch as the street now carries 7,800 vehicles per day. i[e ~oted that his property juts out into the street w[lich is dangerous not only :for the traveling vet~icles but for those iivin~ there, lie was of the opinion tibet the street widening would raise property values and would ~:mke ~lriving ~auch safer on that particular stretch of road. :.tr. Lawrence Wade also spoke in favor of the street widening project. He also explained that there is an old water well whici~ it appears even with the street widening would block pedestrian access to the sidewalk to the extent that one would ]]ave to go out into the street to get around it. Brief discus- sion ensued relative to the possibility of undergrounding or removing saree. ;~r. :kaddox explained, in answer to the property owners, that the City would propose to perform the necessary street work in exchange for land dedication. Tl~is would include curbs, gutters and sidewalk and that a written agreement would be negotiated with each affected property owner, which would include the various details being questioned this date, to tile extent possible. Al the request of Council[',~an Seymour, ~.ir. I-laddox, using tile graphic dis- play posted in the Council Chamber, explained in detail how the street widening project is proposed to be accomplished. Councilman Seymour stated that now that he understands the plan, he could not see how it could be improved. It has attempted to take the property owners feelings into consideration. He agreed that it would be ideal to have a plan for the entire project from one City border to the other, but in reality this is not the way such projects are accomplislmd. RESOLUTIOn; ~.~O. 75R-653: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 75R-653 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COU,~CIL OF T~iE CITY OF Ai~A~iEIli REWUESTIi~G Tike COUNTY OF ORA/~GE TO Ii~CLUDE ~4ITIlIN Tile AP. TERIAL HIG~£~AY FI~Ai~CI,~{G PROGRA24 CERTAI~ lilGIB,~AY Ii~[PROVEMENT PIIOJECTS. (1976-77) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL ~[E/4BERS: Kaywood, Sey~nour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom i~OES: COUNCIL I~iEi. LBERS: i.~Ione ABSENT: COUNCIL I:[EI. tBERS: None Ti~e i~yor declared Resolution ;Io. 75R-653 duly passed and adopted. CITY I?LzK~I~IiIG COi~IISSION ITEl. IS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held 'i4ovember 24, 1975, pertaining to the following applications were sub~aitted for City Council infornation and consideration. On iaotion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilnmn Sneegas, the City Council authorized the actions pertaining to environmental impact report requirements as recommended by the City Planning Cox~unission and sustained the actions taken by the City Planning Cmmaission in connection with the following applications: (Item l~os. 1 througl~ 1,)) 75-1099 City ilall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL HIUUTES - December 16~ 1975~ 1:30 1. ENVIROi,~[ENTAL Ii, R~ACT REPOiiT - CATEGORICAL EXE~.[PTION: The Planning Director has determined that the proposed activities in tt~e following listed zonin~ applications fall within the definition of Section 3.01, Classes 1 or 11 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requiremen[s for an environmental impacu report and are, therefore, categorically exempt from the requiremont to file an environmental impact report: Variance No. 276~) Conditional Use Permit ~;o. 1560 2. ENVIROi'~iENTAL Ii~ACT REPORT -NEGATIV£ OECLA~ITION: The Planning Com- r~ission recommends to the City Council that the subject projects in the following listed zoning applications be declared exempt from tile requirement to prepare an environmental impact report, pursuant to the provisions of the~ California Environmental Quality Act: Variance ~o. 2756 Conditional Use Permit No. 1582 3. VARIA2tCE z{O. 2760: Submitted by Orange Unified Scltool District to con- struct a school on lIS-A-43,000 (SC) zoned property located a~ the nortl~east corner of llohl Ranch Road and Imperial Highway with Code waiver of: a. Prohibited roof-mounted equipment. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-241, denied said variance. 4. VARIANCE lie. 2756; Submitted by R. S. and Jan W. Minnick to establish an automobile tune-up shop on CL zoned property located at 1636 North Lemon Street, with Code waiver of: a. Permitted uses. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-243, granted said variance, subject to conditions. 5. COi{DITIONAL USE PEPR~{IT ilO. 1580: Submitted by Frank Stilwell to permit boat sales and servicing on CG and Cji zoned property located at ~51 North Anaheim Boulevard. The City Planning Co~mnission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-247, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. 6. CONDITIONAL USE PE~'iIT NO. 1582: Submitted by Herbert J. and Alice B. Belshe to permit a 22-unit motel on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located on the east side of Beach Boulevard, north of Ball Road, with Code waivers of: a. ~ximum building height. b. l{inimum building setback. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-24~, granted said conditional use permit, subject to conditions. 7. E.I.R - GRADING PE~.IIT - 121 SOUTH ELDORADO L~$E: On recommendation of the ~ity Planning Coramissi'on, 'th~ City council determined that'application for a grading permit for a single-family residence at 121 South Eldorado Lane, sub' n~itted by Edward Hiller, will have no significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. ~. E.I.R. - NEGATIVE DECLARATION - GRADING PERMITS; 4332 ~D 4338 EAST ADDINGTON DRIVE: On recommendtions of the City Planning Commission, the City Council determined that application for grading permits for single-family residences at 4332 and 4338 East Addington Drive submitted by C, Michael, Inc., will have no significant effect on the environment and are, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report. 9. TRACT NO. 8905: Developer, Texaco-Anaheim Hills, Inc.; tract containing 30 1~I-4000 (SC) zoned lots; located on the east side of Anaheim Hills Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road. 75-1100 City itall, ,'h~aheim~ Cal..ifornia - COU;~CIL ."IIi,~UTES -December 16~ 1975~ 1:30 Tract 2~o. ~q05 was continued to be considered in conjunction with Environ- mental I~.~pact tlcport ilo. 159, ~lccla~sification ~o. 75-76-20, Conditional Ose i;ermit I~o. 1534, and Variance i]o. 2766. 10. Tih~CT i;OS. 9133 ,_.9134 ~ 9135 At~i) 913(~: Developer, Anaheim ilills, Inc.; property located south of Serrano Avenue, east of i'.~oi~l !~nch Road; Tract '.)133 contains 44 i~'.S-5~)~.) zoned lots; Tract ~o. 91'i~4 contains 29 RS-5.000 zoned lots; 2~ract ~'o. 9135 contains 44 RS-5~3~)() zoned lots; Tract No. 9136 contains 29 KS-SO,,')O zoned lots. Tract [~os. 9133, 9134, 9135 and 9136 were continued to be considered in conjunction with Environmental Impact Report ~o. 161 and Variance No. 2763. CARRIED. TE;'~TATIVE 'P~ Ti-LtCT ~0. 5501 (i~VISIOil NO. 5).: Developer, A & C Connnercial t'roperties; tract containing 40 i~1-1200 zoned lots; located at the northeast corner of the Riverside Freeway and Iliraloi:~a Way. On motion by Councilwoman Ka~ood, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Tentative '.~p, Tract No. 5501 (Revision No. 5) was continued to be considered in conjunction with Environmental Impact Report l.Io. 15:~. I.~OTION CARRIEi). SOLICITATION PER~[IT - CiiILOtlE~,~ OF GOD: Application of Joseph A. ?loody, Children of God, 1'. O. Box 1905, Garden Grove, California, for permission to solicit funds within the City of Anaheii.~ frot.~ November 25, 1975 through January 25, 1976, was withdrawn by the applicant. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council approved the request for withdrawal of said permit to solicit. 1.lOTIOi~ CAI[RIEI). SOLICI~£ATIOil PEPdIIT - ISKCOi{ I~C.: Application by Fred tiawk, ISKOi~ Inc., (Inter- national Society for i[risl~na Consciousness) for permission ~o solicit funds in ti~e City of Anaheim from December 15, 1975 through February 15, 1976, was denied, as recommended by the City Attorney, on ~aotion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley. i,IOTIO~ CARRIED. TEi'~TATi.VE ..}L~P~ TP~ACT liD. 91~80: Developer, Woodbine Corporation; tract containing 31 RS-3OO0 (SC) zoned lots; located south of Serrano Avenue, west of iiidden Canyon l'.oad. On motion by Councilwoman I[aywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, action on Tentative [~ap, Tract No. 9'.)~0 was continued to be considered together with Environmental Impact Report No. 160 and Variance No. 2764. }.{OTION CARRIED. PURCiLASE OF E(~UI.P~flCNT - Oi.IE (1) TRUCll ,~IOUNTED OIL DISTRIBUTOR: The Ad~:~inistrative Assistant reported on the recommended purchase of one (1) truck mounted oil distributor (bid ilo. 3026) and advised that one manufacturer, Atlantic Welding has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the a~aount of $16,74~.00, including tax. iie thereupon recommended the purchase be authorized. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, purchase was authorized in the amount of $16,74~.90, including tax. MOTION CARRIED. PtlllCthkSE ~F EqUIPI.~ii{T - FOUll (4) COl[PACT SEDA~{S Ai~D Oi~E (1) STATIOi{ WAGON; The Administrative Assistant reported on inforr~ml bids received for the purchase of four (4) coiapact sedans and one (1) station wagon as follows and reco~,maended acceptance of the low bids sub~itted: bid i~o. 3019 - four (4) cold,pact se~lans, Santa Ana Dodge- $16,857.38, including tax, Bid No. 3019 - one (1) station wagon, i'lcCoy Ford - $4,935.12, including tax. On ~otion by Councilwoman ~ia)~zood, seconded by Councilwoman Thom, the low bids of '~',anta Ama Dodge and i~cCoy Ford were accepted and purchases aut'~orized in tile a~ounts of ~16,857.3~.~, includini~ tax, and ~4,9d5.12, including tax, respect ively. I~OTIOI! CARi~IED. 75-1101 City 4all~ Anaheim~ California - COU~CIL ;-[Ii,~UTi]S - December l~m 1975~ 1:30 P.~I. PURCIIASE OF E~UIPf.UJlIT - ONE. (1) TRUCIi MOUJTED WAT~cR TA/JK: The Administrative Assistant reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one (1) truck uounted water tank and reco~nended acceptance of the low bid submitted by Garwood-L.A. Truck, in nhe amount of ~12,333.10, including tax. On mo~ion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the low bid of Garwood-L.A. Truck, was accepted and t,urchase authorized in the amoung of $1')-, 333.10, including tax. ~'IOTION CARRIED. O~DINAI~CE 1]0. 3491: Councilnmn Thom offered Ordinance No. 3491 for adoption. ~(efer to Ordinance Book. Al'{ ORDINAi~CE OF TIiE CITY OF A:L\]IEI?! A/ff~f:DING £ECTION 1.05.030 OF T}iE Ai.;Anl~IH liU~ICIPAL CODE. (Assistant City Yk~nager) Roll Call Vote; ~-~YES: COUNCIL i.~MBERS; Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL .~fl~?iBEi'IS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL I,~:[BERS; None The l~yor declared Ordinance No. 3491 duly passed and adopted. OISB~U)~IENT - TASK FORCE FOR CAiIYO;; SITE NO. : (Pinney and Gerda) Councilman Seymour reported that the task force recently appointed to formulate a plan for development of the Canyon Park Site No. 1 located at Pinney and Gerda Drives, has accomplished that purpose, with unanimous agreement on the plan. Councilman Seymour thereupon moved that the Canyon Site No. 1 Task Force be disbanded. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded tl~e motion. HOTION CARRIED. COUXCIL POSITION ON AB 1432 Ai;D SB ~%~: (Anti-pornography legislation) In answer to Councilman Seymour, ~. Watts reported that a letter has been for- warded to the author of AB 14~2 indicating that the City Council of ~he City of Anaheim endorses such legislation and requesting its reintroduction in the next legislative session. Councilman Seymour further requested that copies of SB 886 be copied and distributed to Council Hembers to review prior to their considering the authorization of forwarding of letters, etc., in support. SUPPORT OF FEDElbkL REVENUE SHARING CONCEPT; Mayor Thom introduced a com- munication received from Bill Morgan, the City's b~n in Washington, urging ;hat the City Council iraraediately support t]~e concept of Federal Revenue Sharing with correspondence to Congressmen. By general consent, the City Council directed the Manager's Office to pre- pare letters to all Congressmen in Orange County advising of the City Council's support of Federal Revenue Sharing. [~J~CESS - EXECUTIVE SE.SSION: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to Executive Session. Councilman Sne'egas seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4;45 P.I~.) AFTER tLECESS: l.~ayor Thou called the meeting to order, all ?fembers of ;he City Council being present. ,%DJOUP~{~],i;T: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to adjourn. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5:20 P.M. ALONA ~I. HOUGARD, CITY