1975/12/3075-1120
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 30, 1975, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
STADIUM-CONVENTION CENTER-GOLF DIRECTOR: Tom Liegler
UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon W. Hoyt
CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox
!~UNFOWER PLANNER: William Hepburn
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR: Don McDaniel
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti
Mayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance
to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION; Reverend Gordon Sloan of Melodyland Hotline Center gave the
invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman John Seymour led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
SALE OF TICKETS TO THE FREEDOM TRAIN: Mr. Tom Liegler sold tickets and badges
for the Freedom Train exhibit which will be at the Anaheim Stadium from
January 9 to 13, 1976 to each member of the City Council.
MIN-O~ES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meetings held November 18
and November 25, 1975, were approved on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded
by Councilman Sneegas. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the
waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading
of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of
such ordinance or resolution. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion.
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the
amount of $1,467,119.71 in accordance with the 1975-76 Budget were approved.
PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT - ELECTRIC UTILITY: The City Attorney submitted a
memorandum regarding procedural steps to placement of the proposed charter
amendment on the ballot. He advised that should Council desire this proposed
amendment on the Municipal Ballot in April of 1976, action to accomplish this
must be taken by January 13, 1976. He advised that the text of the proposed
amendment as shown in this memorandum is identical to that which was presented
by the Charter Amendment Task Force Committee in June of 1975, with one
exception, the addition of one sentence added onto the language, which
would provide that monies paid for services from other city departments by the
electric utility be excluded from the 10% of gross revenues~figure which may be
transferred to the General Fund.
Mr. Watts also pointed out that in the language of the charter amendment
the term "Public Utility" is used. While it was certainly the intent of the
Council to deal with the Electrical Division, this terminology would include the
Water Division. If it is not the Council's desire to include the Water Division
in the charter amendment, then it will be necessary to revise that language.
In response to Councilman Seymour, Mr. Hoyt stated that the 10% of gross
revenues figure is an arbitrary number suggested at a meeting of the Charter
Amendment Task Force.
Councilman Seymour stated that he questioned this 10% figure inasmuch as in
most private enterprise companies the bottom line return is not much better than
10%. Therefore, if that situation is true with the City's Utility Department,
the effect of this proposed charter amendment would be to permit transfer of all
of the profit generated by the utility to the General Fund which is just what
the amendment is intended to preclude.
75-1121
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 30, 1975, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Watts stated that the language of the amendment indicates the transfer is
not to exceed 10% and the Council would not be obligated to transfer that
amount. In addition there is a clause which specifies that the lowest rates
possible will be maintained which are consistent with sound business principles
and the cost of service. He pointed out that it is difficult to accomplish the
objective of insuring the lowest rates possible with a charter amendment when
it is the City Council who sets the rates.
Councilman Seymour stated that he felt some research is required through a
sample of private utility companies' financial statements to ascertain how their
bottom line percentage compares to gross revenues, as this would indicate what
is reasonable to expect.
Mr. Hoyt stated that he would prepare such a comparison indicating also,
to the best of their ability, what transfers have been made to the general funds
in the past, expressed as a percent of the previous y~arts gross revenue. He also
advised that he has been meeting with the Chamber Task Force which is working on
a proposal to establish a Utilities Con~nission and that perhaps the Council would
prefer to receive their recommendation prior to the placement of this proposed
charter amendment on the ballot. Mr. Hoyt noted that since profits from
electrical generation are not expected to mmterialize until the 1980's, there
is no urgency in placing this item on the April ballot; that it could still be
included with the June or November elections in 1976.
Councilwoman Kmywood agreed that there is no urgency for placement on the
April ballot and stressed concern that the wording of the proposed amendment be
clear and easily understood by the electors.
Mr. Hoyt indicated he would present the results of his research at the
January 6, 1976 Council meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-672 - AGREEMENT WITH GALBRAITH & GREEN (ADMINISTRATORS OF SELF-
FUNDED EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN): Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No.
75R-672 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH GALBRAITH & GREEN, INC., (of Southern California)
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-672 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY ENGINEER TO ACCEPT DEDICATION ON PARCEl.
MAPS FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES: The City Attorney reported that this
resolution would delegate authority to the City Engineer to accept dedications
on parcel maps only insofar as these conform with the existing Circulation
Element of the General Plan or local street standards.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-673: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-673 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHIM DELEGATING TO THE CITY
ENGINEER THE AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT DEDICATION OF LAND FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY
PURPOSES IN PARCEL MAPS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~aywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
75-1122
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 30~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-673 duly passed and adopted.
USE OF GLOVER STADIUM "CALL TO ACTION" GROUP: Request of Michael & Diane Morgan,
Orange County Co-Chairman, "Call to Action" Group of the Family Life Bureau of
the Los Angeles Catholic Archdiocese, 15882 Maybrook Street, Westminster, 92683,
for permission to hold a rally at Glover Stadium, La Palma Park, on January 22,
1976, at 7:00 P.M. was, submitted together with report from Dick Kamphefner,
Acting Director of Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department, indicating that
arrangements have been made to allow the use of the west end of the park and
football grandstand with normal rental charges applied.
Mr. Watts advised that this item was inadvertently scheduled on the agenda
and no Council action would be necessary.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-674 - PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES, PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS:
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 75R-674 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ASCERTAINING AND DETERMIN-
ING THE PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID FOR EACH CRAFT, OR TYPE OF WORKMAN,
OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-674 duly passed and adopted.
THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT - NORTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT -
HOUSING REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE PROJECT: Request of William Hepburn for Council
authorization to expend an additional $10,425 of 1975-76 CETA Title 1 Entitlement
Funds for extension of the Housing Repair and Maintenance Program to June 30, 1976,
was submitted together with the proposed third amendment to the agreement with the
North Orange County Community College District which would accomplish this.
Councilman Seymour questioned the limited response from the Anaheim community
relative to hiring of those individuals 55 years of age and older in this program.
Mr. Hepburn attributed the lower response than anticipated to the delay in
receipt of funding until September and the fact that they consequently kept
recruitmcnt to a minimum since there were no on-site activities. He reported
that there are now 16 individuals in the program, with a waiting list of 12,
the median age being 48. He also noted that the program provides a training
allowance of $75 per week which is not much of a financial incentive. He stated
that the payment of wages which would be more reasonable compensation is under
consideration as an alternative in formulating this program. He agreed with
Councilman Seymour that it is one of their objectives to raise the median age of
individuals enrolled in this program from 48 to 55 and higher.
RESOLUTION NO. 75R-675: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-675 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF A THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH NORTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE TERM THEROF AND FOR ADDITIONAL
COMPENSATION. (Housing repair and maintenance program - through June 30, 1976,
$49,983 total)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-675 duly passed and adopted.
75-1123
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 30, 1975, 1:30 P.M.
ANAHEIM HOST LIONS CLUB - MARTIN RECREATION CENTER: Memorandum from Lloyd J.
Trapp, Recreation Superintendent~ reporting that the Anaheim Host Lions Club
financial obligation toward the cost of Martin Recreation Center, having
reached $83,736.84 has been met, was submitted for Council consideration.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Snaegas, the City
Council authorized the City Attorney to prepare a letter advising the Anaheim
Host Lions Club that their financial obligation at the Martin Recreation Center
has been fullfilled and thanking them for their civic leadership and cooperation
in this project. MOTION CARRIED.
PROPOSALS FOR CONCESSIONAIRE - ANAHEIM STADIUM: Mr. Tom Liegler presented
recommendation that the City Council meet in adjourned regular session on
January 14 or 15, 1976, for the purpose of hearing full proposals from the
following five national food and beverage operators: Araserve; Canteen
Corporation; Interstate United; Servomation; Szabo.
Mr. Liegler reported that preliminary to this recommendation, a proposal
interview committee has met with some 14 firms and heard their proposals at
length.
It is the unanimous recommendation, with one exception, of the City and
CaliforniaAngelsrepresentatives that the five above-mentioned firms be further
considered and evaluated according to a list of judgmental criteria prepared
by the interview committee. These criteria were utilized by all members of the
committee who came to the same conclusions independently. Mr. Liegler stated
that he would like to reserve the ability to conduct further negotiations with
the finally selected contractor following the Council meeting at which these
proposals are presented. He advised that they weighed the financial presenta-
tion heavily in the criteria, and although most of the proposals were originally
presented verbally, the firms will be asked to abide by the rule requesting
that their proposal not be changed for the normal presentation to Council.
Mr. Liegler stated that the only difference of opinion between the City
and Angels representatives was with the staff recommendation that, as courtesy,
the Canteen Corporation, the concessionaire for the past 10 years, be permitted
to present their proposal. Mr. Liegler advised that the first Angels home game
of the season will be held April 2, 1976, and there is a good deal of work to be
completed prior to opening. Therefore, it is hoped that Council will be able to
reach their final decision by February 3, 1976.
Mr. Red Patterson, President of the California Angels, stated that the Angels
are interested in the best food service and best contract for the City, which
they do not feel they have enjoyed in their association with the Canteen Corpor-
ation over the past I0~years. Therefore, they cannot wholeheartedly recommend
that Canteen Corporation be continued as the Anaheim Stadium concessionaire
although they have no objection to the Council hearing the proposals from that firm.
By general consent the Council determined to meet in adjourned regular
session on January 15, 1976, 1:30 P.M.,to hear proposals from the five
concession firms as recommended by Mr. Liegler.
DESIGNATION - HEALTH SYSTEMS PLANNING AGENCY FOR ORANGE COUNTY: Application by
the County of Orange for designation as the Health Systems Planning Agency for
Orange County and request for endorsement of their candidacy by the Anaheim
City Council was continued to the Council meeting of January 20, 1976, as
requested by the County, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman
Kmywood. MOTION CARRIED.
SUMMARY OF PARKING, SANITATION AND STORAGE STUDY - ROBIN, BLUEJAY, CHEVY CHASE
APARTMENT AREA: Pursuant to direction given by the City Council at their meeting
of December 9, 1975, to investigate the parking and sanitation problems in the
Robin, Bluejay, Chevy Chase apartment area~ a summary report dated December 30,
1975, was submitted by the Planning Department indicating recommendations for
both immediate and subsequent improvements which might be made to that area.
(Complete copy of said report and graphic summary of recommendations on file in
the office of the City Clerk.) The recommendations were reviewed with the City
Council by Miss Santalahti.
75-1124
City ~tall~ ~h~aheim~ California - COUJCIL MINUTES - December 30~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Seymour voiced the opinion that the easiest method ~o correct
the pro}~lem in that area would be to extend the sidewalk to "bend" into tt~e
parkway near the driveways, thereby providing a detour around any vehicles
parked which overi~ang into the normal pedestrian sidewalk area. He indicated
that he felt it would be appropriate to determine the costs of this alter-
native.
~,ir. Don McDaniel advised that it is the Planning Department's suggestion
that in order to pursue implementation of tiiese recommendations, the City staff
committee which was formed to resolve the street sweeping problem in the
multiple-family area, meet with owners and tenants in this subject area and
calculate costs of the various recommendations.
At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Seymour stated that staff has
reco~,u,aended the right approach, and with the consent of the remainder of the
Council, the Planning Department was so directed to proceed to meet and estab-
lisi{ an implementation plan to pursue ti~e immediate and subsequent improvements
as recommended in the memorandum.
~irs. }{arie L. Sutcliffe, 1245 North Wren, No. D, Anaheim, 92801, was pre-
sent representing the tenants of the area and was advised t~at an imple-
mentation plan for solutions to the problems will be presented to the City
Cou~lcil at their regular meeting of January 27, 1976. She was further invited
to work with this conumittee and give the necessary input from the tenants.
itEii()VAL A2.~D ~,ESTORATIOf; - T£LLEiIS-~i£i;T OiIG,JX;: (Continued fro~ the meeting of
Oece;',~ber 23, 1975 pending additional information.) b~s. Leta Archer, Director,
~h~aheim Foundation for Culture and the Arts, advised ghat during the past week
she i~as t~een in touch with Blaine Ricketts and has been advised that tl~e total
cost quoted of $3,509 does include restoration of the automatic player and harp
features of the Tellers-Kent Organ to be relocated at the Cultural Arts Center.
During brief discussion, Council Members indicated concern tibet someone
who is knowledgeable of this musical instrument be available to see that this
installation and restoration is properly performed prior to the City making the
final payment.
~irs. Archer advised that she knew of some people who could render that
service. She advised that although sl~e was more impressed with Newport Organs
from discussion held with them, she was certain that Blaine Ricketts was also
qualified to perform the services required.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
City Council authorized the City Attorney to prepare a letter agreement wit~ '
Blaine Riclcetts, P. O. Box 17069, Los Angeles, California, 90017~ for removal
and restoration of the Tellers-Kent Organ currently located at the Wagner ,~iouse
on State College Boulevard to the Cultural Arts Center for tt~e sum of $3~500~
said fee to include restoration of the automatic player and harp features of
ti~e organ. I~OTION CARRIED.
APPROVAL OF REVISED PLAi~S - R£CLASSIFICATION ;~O. 74-75-39; Revised pla~s were
submitted in conjunction with Reclassification No. 74-75-39 for property
located at 2683 West Ball Road on Deceraber 20, 1975, and were approved, subject
to the applicant, Hike Clark, submitting a letter this date indicating agree-
ment with said revised plans by the four property owners abutting the north
property line of subject parcel.
Hiss Santalahti reported that a letter was received containing signatures
of the three adjacent property owners all agreeing to the revised plans and
recognizing that they would be trading a 5-foot landscaped buffer zone and 12-
foot high building wall for a 10-foot high carport wall. The fourth affected
property owner, whose signature is not included on the letter, is I.~r. i-icAlister
wI~o was present aud addressed the Council at their meeting of December 23,
1975.
In connection with the direction given that the carport wall which would
abut the north property line be lowered as much as possible, Miss Santalahti
advised that according to Building Code regulations, in any area with less than
a ti~ree-foot setback from the rear property line, the carport would be required
to i~ave 30-inch high parapet walls and a i'.D 1/2-foot wall would be the lowest
7b-1125
City ~iall~ 7Ulaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 30! 1975~ 1:3
permitted. Any further reduction would require that tile wall be setback a
~:~inimux:~ of 3 feet fro~a the rear property line. She advised that all four of
the property owners are aware that the wall will be 10 1/2 feet as this is
indicated in the letter filed.
On motion by Council~aan Sey~aour, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City
Council confirraed approval of revised plans submitted in conjunction with
Reclassification i~o. 74-75-39. LIOYiO~ CARRIE~).
CONSE~T CALENDAR iTE~{S: On ~aotion by Councilman Sey~aour, seconded by Council~aan
Ti~o~a, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and
recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
C.~lendar Agenda:
1. CLAI?IS AGAINST TliE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to
the insurance carrier:
a. Claim submitted by Clarence C. Humphries for damages sustained to
property located at State College Boulevard and La Palma Avenue, purportedly
sustained as a result of exDlosion causing high voltage to be run into the
ground, on or about Septeraber 16, 1975.
b. Claim submitted by Micl~ael J. Richardson, for personal injuries pur-
portedly sustained as a result of actions of Anaaeim Police Officers, on or
about September 23, 1975.
c. Claim submitted by Morris B. Feigenbaun for property damages
purportedly sustained as a result of large opening in road before railroad
trac~cs on Brookhurst Street near Katella Avenue, on or about December ~, 1975.
d. Claim submitted by Richard E. Bell for injuries purportedly sustained
as a result of actions of Anaheim Police Officers, on or about September 20,
1975.
e. Claim submitted by Elaine P. Taylor for injuries and damages pur-
portedly sustained as a result of condition of sidewalk maintained by City, on
or about December 7, 1975.
2. PUBLIC OA~4CE, OINNER-DAi;CING FLACE~ Ai{USEMEi4T DEVICES AND PRIVATE PATROI.
PEi2'~ITS: The following permits were granted subject to the recommendations of
the Ct~ief of Police:
a. Public Dance Per, nit for dance to be held January 25, 1976, from 3:00
p.m. to 7:00 p.~a. at Carpenter's Hall, 608 West Vermont Avenue, Sociedad
Progresista blexicana Logia No. 24 (Ruth C. Hernandez, Applicant).
b. Amusement Devices Permit for one juke box to be located at Granada
Inn, 23~{3 West Lincoln Avenue (James V. Anders, Anders Music Company,
Applicant).
c. Amusement Devices Permit for one juke box to be located at Ellie's
Place, 1652 West Lincoln Avenue, (James V. Anders, Anders Music Company,
Applicant).
d. Amusement Devices Permit for one j uke box to be located at Golden Key,
2625 West Lincoln Avenue, (James V. Anders, Anders Music Company, Applicant)
e. Private Patrol Permit for Allsafe Security Inc., to engage in special
security services for special event activities (Ward A. Hall, Applicant).
3. CORRESPOi~DENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and
filed:
1975.
a. Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County Resolutions.
b. Orange County Human Relations Commission - Minutes - November 13,
c. Anaheim Public Library Board - Highlights and Minutes - November 17,
9fO,
d. Project Area Co~mnittee Meeting (Alpha) - Minutes - November 25, 1975.
e. California Coastal Plan.
f. Financial and operating reports for the month of November 1975, for
the ~]ngineering Oivision, Public Library and City Treasurer.
g. '£ask Force for Santa Ana Canyon Park Site No. 1 - Minutes -
i)ece~:~ber 15, 1975.
~. Joint Co~aunty Redevelopment Co~mnission and Intermode Committee
}:inutes- Oecember 3, 1975.
75-1126
City iiall~ Anaheim~ California - COU,4CIL MIi~OTES - December 30p 1975~ 1:30 P.:.I.
COIIRiiSPOi,rDEi~CE - CITY OF SAJ~TA Ai.;A RESOLUTIO~ ~'~O. 75-174; Councilman Sneegas
requested tl~is item be re~oved frogs the Consent Calendar and following, brief
discussion suggested that the Council go on record adopging the same position
as the City of Santa Aha, condemning the resolution of the United Nations
falsely accusin~ Zionists as being racist and urging tl~at ~he United ~ations
rescind this resolution.
KESOLUTIO'~.] NO. 75R-676: Counciih~an Sneegas offered Resolution No. 75R-676 for
adoption and further requested that letters indicating this position be for-
warded to all Orange County Congress~aen.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTIOi~ OF TIlE CITY COU:~C. IL OF Tile CITY OF Az{AIiEI:I COilDEHi'~ING TIlE
IiESOLUTIOi~ OF THE UNITED NATIOn, S F~SELY ACCUSIAG ZIONISM AS BEIi~G ~CIST ~D
Ut{CIVIC T~T Tile UNITi~D NATIOn, S RESCIND TiilS RESOLUTIONS.
~oll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL :~Ei. IBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, i'eOley, Sneegas and Thom
i~OES: COUi,ICIL ME~'IBERS: None
2kiS~;I~I~T: COUNCIL i%E~IBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-676 duly passed and adopted.
CORtlESPO~DENCE - CITY OF COLTOi~ RLSOLUTiOi; i~O. 3555: Councilman Seymour
requested this item be removed front the Consent Calendar and suggested that the
Anaheim City Council adopt a similar position to that of the City of Colton,
urging the National League of Cities to adopt a resolution requesting Federal
Legislation to correct the "rate squeeze" situation in regard to municipal
electrical systems and to provide for preliminary hearings before rate
increases are allowed under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act.
i~SOLUTION i~O. 75R-677: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-677 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF Tile CITY COU.~CIL OF TilE CITY OF A2~A~LEIM, CALIFORi~IA, URGI~IG TIiE
NATIOn,AL LEAGUE OF CITIES TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION REQUESTING FEDER~iL LEGISLATIOi~
TO CORIIECT THE "IIATE SQUEEZE" SITUATION Ii~ REGARD TO MUlqICIPAL ELECTRICAL
SYSTEi, iS AND TO PROVIDE FOR PRELI,qlNARY HEARINGS BEFORE RATE INCREASES ARE
ALLOWED U:~DER SECTIO~,I 2¢)5 OF T}iE FEDEIh~L POWER ACT,
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL ME'AidERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUiqCIL HE2,I2~ERS: None
ABSENT: COUi~CIL ME]IBERS: None
The ?layor declared Resolution No. 75R-677 duly passed, and adopted.
Councilman Sneega$ left the Council Chamber. (2:55 P.M.)
CITY PL~INING CO:.~iISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held Dece~tber ~, 1975, pertaining to the following applications
were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City
Council authorized the actions pertaining to environmenCal impact requirements
as recommended by the City Planning Co~mnission and sustained the actions taken
by the City Planning Co~:~aission in connection with the following applications:
(Item l~os. 1 through 9)
1. E.iVIRONi, IENTAL I~tPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXE~.LPTIONS: The Planning
Director has determined that the proposed activities in the following listed
zoning applications fall within the definition of Section 3.01, Classes 1 or 11
of tim City of Anahein~ Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental
i~pact report and are, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to
file an environmental impact report:
75-1127
City tlall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES -December 30~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M.
Conditional Use Permit No. 1579
Variance i~o. 2759
Variance No. 2762
Variance No. 2754
Variance No. 2761
2. EiIVIRO~ENTAL Ii-~ACT REPORT - NEGATIVE I)ECLA~.~TIO~: The Planning Com-
mission recommends to the City Council that the subject projects in
following lists zoning applications be declared exempt from the requirement to
prepare an environmental i~.~pact report, pursuant to the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act:
Conditional Use Permit ~o. 1573 Conditional Use Permit No. 1585
3. CO:;DITIONAL USE PLR2~IIT N~). 1573: Application by V. E. Renner and l,~. K.
Schunmcher to permit a motel and recreational vehicle park on RS-A-43,000 zoned
property located at 400 West Ball Road with Code waivers of:
a. l~ximum building heigl~t.
b. l~finimum building setback.
c. Required site screening.
The City Planning Co~mnission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-249, granted
said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
4. COI;DITIONAL USE PEI~.~IT NO. 1585: Application submitted on behalf of ~bel
A. Yorba to permit a lumberyard on RS-A-43,OO0 zoned property on the north side
of La Palma Avenue, west of Imperial Highway, with Code waiver of:
a. ~ximum sign area. (Withdrawn)
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-256, granted
said conditional use permit in part, waiver "a" having been withdrawn, subject
to conditions.
5. VARIanCE NO. 2754: Application by William i,I. Clow to permit outdoor
storage of trucks and tractors on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located at 203
East Sin~ons Avenue with Code waiver of:
a. Permitted accessory uses.
The City Planning Co[mnission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-257, granted
said variance, subject to conditions.
6. VARIA/~CE NO. 2759: Application by Warren L. Munyon to establish an office
in a single-family residence on RS-7200 zoned property located at 2274 West
Sequoia Avenue, with Code waiver of;
a. Permitted uses.
The City Planning Co~mnission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-258, denied
said variance.
7. VARIANCE i~O. 2761: Application by Deverity L. Gaines to permit an existing
garage conversion on RS-7200 zoned property located at 535 Jeanine Street with
Code waiver of:
a. Minimum number of enclosed parking spaces.
The City Planning Cormmission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-259, granted
said variance, subject to conditions.
~. VARIanCE i~O. 2762: Application by Holiday Harbor Apartments to permit an
existing sign on RM-1200 zoned property located at 440 West Orangewood Avenue
with Code waiver of:
a. ?~aximum sign area.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-260, granted
said variance, subject to conditions.
City tlall~ Anaheim~ California - CObi~CIL MINUTES - December 30.; 1975; 1:30
9. CO~II)iTiO~AL USE PEt~[IT NO. 1524 - APPROVAL OF TE~.H~ORARy FENCE: Request of
William E. Uhl, Project Arc~itect for Leroy Rose and Associates, for approval
of a temporary redwood fence to screen the nort~ boundary of property located
on ti~e east side of Claudine Street, west side of Emily Street, north of
Cypress Street (a proposed Salvation Arx~y Church facility) for an unspecified
period of time after which it would be replaced by portions of the proposed
building walls and a masonry wall·
The City Planning Co~.m~ission by ~otion granted approval of the temporary
redwood fence as requested for a period of one year, subject to conditions.
Council~n Sneegas temporarily absent. MOTIO,4 CARRIEO.
Councilman Sneegas returned to the Council Chamber. (2:56 P,I'I.)
CiTY ~'LBH~NING COb~IISSIO[~ ITZ['~iS: The followin~ actions taken by the City Planning
Commission at their meeting held December S, 1975, pertaining to the following
a~plications were removed from the above Consent Calendar for discussion and
separate action by the City Council·
1. COIIDITIONAL USE PEIC.,IIT NO. 1579: Application of Church of Jesus Christ to
permafit a church expansion on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located at 2446 West
Orange Avenue.
The City Planning Cona2ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-255, granted
said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
Following brief discussion regarding the possible parking ramifications
from the proposed expansion and upon ascertaining that there was no opposition
expressed at the Planning Conm~ission level, on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood,
seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council sustained the action taken by
the City Planning Co~aission, granting Conditional Use permit No. 1579. MOTION
CARRIEI).
o GENERAL PLAN {A~DOUT MAP: Proposed addition to this map, that a stamp be
prepared and affixed to said map with certain wording to clarify the intent of
the map to new home purchasers, i.e., that the General Plan is not a precise
plan.
Councilwoman Kay~ood explained that in the future she would prefer in all
references to this map~ that it be called the "General Plan Informational'}-~p".
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman 8neegas, the pro-
posed suamp to be prepared and affixed to the General Plan Informational
was approved. MOTION CARt',lED.
TENTATIVE MAP~ T~CT NO. 5501 (t~VISION NO. 5) AND E.I.R. NO. 158: Developer,
A ~ C Co~m~ercial Properties; property located at the northeast corner of the
Riverside Freeway and Miraloma Way; containing 40 ~.1-1200 zoned lots; submitted
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held December 8, 1975, by
motion recommended that the City Council certify E.I.R. No. 158 as being in
complaince with the California Environmental Quality Act and further approved
Tentative ~.iap, Tract No. 5501, Revision No. 5, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, Reclassification
No. 63-64-5, now pending shall be completed.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. Tt~at all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. 'fhat a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County ilecorder.
5. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council
approw~l of the final tract map, and, f~rt~er, tl~at the approved covenants,
75-1129
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MIRIUTE$ - December 30~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M.
conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final
tract ~ap.
6. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to
approval of a final tract
7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
tl~e appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appro-
priate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building per-
mit is issued.
8. That ¢lrainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
that is satisfactory to the City Engineer.
9. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
10. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
11. That Lot 31 shall be enlarged to 80.5 feet by taking 7 fee~ of front-
age from Lot 32, and the balance of Lot 32 to remain as open space, and as part
of the CC&Rs, duly owned and maintained by the homeo~ners group, and that play-
ground equipment shall be installed for the benefit of tenants.
12. That the area along the block wall at the rear of ~he garages, backing
up to thc Riverside Freeway shall be screened with Cypress trees on 5-foot
centers.
13. That the petitioner stipulated Walgreen Street would not be closed.
14. That noise attenuation shall be in accordance with Council Policy No.
542.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood's question regarding the final deter-
mination on the necessity for a traffic signal at the intersection of Sunshine
Way and .'Iiraloma Avenue, Miss Santalahti reported that a revised plan was sub-
mitted which provides full access on a public street through to Walgreen Street
and consequently the traffic signal is no longer necessary.
Hr. David Stone of I.P.S., lOq5 North Main Street, Orange, responded to
Councilwoman Kaywood's concerns about open space recreation and tile insulation
to be utilized in the units advising that a uini-park consisting of 12,00D-
square feet will be provided with playground equipmment; that all walls between
the units will be double stud with a one-inch separation and additional sound
control material will be utilized in these walls; that the toilet facilities
and other noisy plumbing apparatus will not be installed in connnon walls
between the units.
ENVIRONI,[Ei~TAL IiIPACT REPORT NO. 158 - CERTIFICATION: E.I.R. No. 158 having
been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the City Planning Con~ission
to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of California
Environmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such information and'
belief does hereby certify on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by
Councilman Seymour, that E.I.R. No. 158 is in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines. MOTION CARRIED.
On ~tion by Councilman Febley, seconded by Councilman Seymour, Tentative
~,[ap, Tract i]o. 5501, Revision No. 5, together with its design and improvement
was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and was approved,
subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. IIOTION
CARRIED.
VAP. IPUqCE ~O. 2764 Ai~D E.I.R. NO. 160 (TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9080): Application of
Woodbine Corporation for the following Code waivers to establish a 31-lot, 30-
unit i~S-5000 (SC) single-family subdivision on RS-A-43,000 (SC) zoned property
located on the south side of Serrano Avenue, west of Hidden Canyon Road, was
submitted together with E.I.R. No. 160:
a. ~inimum lot width.
b. Requirement that single-family structures rear on arterial
highways.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-262, recom-
mended that the City Council certify E.I.R. No. 160 as being in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act and further granted Variance No. 2764
subject to conditions. '
75-1130
Ci.ty Hall~ Anat~eim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 30~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M.
Ei,~VIROi~}'fENTAL Ii'H~ACT Ri'~PORT NO. 160 - CERTIFICATION; E.I.R. No. 160, having
been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the City Planning Co~mnission
to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of California
Environmental ~uality Act, the City Council acting upon such information and
belief does here certify, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by
Councilman Sneegas, that E.I.R. No. 160 is in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council took no further action on Variance No. 2764.
TENTATIVE ~h~ TiLACT NO. 9!)~0 (VARIANCE NO. 2764 AND E.I.R. 160): Developer,
Woodbine Corporation; property located on the south side of Serrano Avenue,
west of Hidden Canyon Road; containing 31 RS-5000 (SC) zoned lots.
The City Planning Co~aission at their meeting held December 8, 1975,
approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 9080, subject to ~he following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9080 is granted
subject to the approval of Variance No. 2764.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That in accordance with City Council Policy, a 6-foot open, decorative
fence at the top of the slope shall be constructed on the north property lines
separating Lot i~os. 1 - 11 and 14 - 18, and Serrano Avenue. Reasonable land-
scaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented
portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans
for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the
Superintendent of Parkway l~intenance; and following installation and
acceptance, the City of Anaheim sl~all assume the responsibility for maintenance
of said landscaping.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
6. That any proposed subdivision covenants, conditions, and restrictions
shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City
Council approval of the final tract map, and, furt~er, that the approved
covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the
final tract n~p.
7. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operating corporation, including but not limited to the
articles of incorporation bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of corm~on property and buildings, and such other inforn~atiou
as the City Attorney ~-my desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
8. That street names s]~all be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to
the approval of a final tract map.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as deter~nined to be appro-
priate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
10. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satis-
factory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site, sufficient
grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading shall
be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all required off-site
drainage facilities have been installed and are operative. Positive assurance
shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities will be completed
prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site drainage facilities
shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have initiated
condemnation proceedings t~erefor (the costs of which shall be borne by the
developer) prior to the comraencement of grading operations. The required
drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff
waters originating from higher properties through said property to ultimate
disposai as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be
the first item of construction and shall be completed and be functional
t~roughout the tract and from the down, stream boundary of the property to the
ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final building
75-1131
~jiall~ Anaheim~ California - COU~'~CIL HINUTES - December 30~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M.
inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement agreements
may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request.
11. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to mini~ize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into the San~a Aha River by storm
water originating from or flowing through this project.
12. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to occupancy.
13. That all sanitary sewers shall be constructed in public street rights
of way unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
14. That all roofing materials s~all be noncombustible and approved by the
Anaheim City Fire Department.
15, That a fire fuel break shall be provided at the perimeter of the tract
as required by the Anaheim City Fire Department.
16. That a final parcel map on subject tract shall be filed and recorded
wita the County Recorder prior to tl~e approval of the final tract map.
17. Petitioner shall conform to all parcel map requirements of 66426 et
seq. of the Government Code of California.
1~]. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, the petitioner
shall submit final specific floor and house plans and elevations ~o tile Plan-
ning CoI,unission for approval.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, fir. P~ddox assured Council }fembers
tibet storm drain requirements would be adequately handled by Condition No. 10
as imposed on subject tentative map.
i[r. George R. Putnam, Assistant Vice Presi.Jent, S & S Construction Com-
pany, addressed the Council requesting that the condition requiring final
specific floor and !louse plans and elevations be submitted to the Planning
Con~nission for approval (Condition No. 15) be removed since this would cause
his firm some inconvenience in pre-selling homes, i.e., allowing the home buyer
to select the model and lot preferred. However on being amsured by staff that
this condition is standard and routinely imposed on new subdivisions,
Mr. Putnam withdrew his request.
i~. Putnam further assured Councilwoman Kaywood that they do not intend to
construct fences which would obstruct views but rather the design of the sub-
division is intended to enhance and create views.
On uotion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, Tentative
~bzp, Tract :~o. 90,30, together with its design and improvement was found to be
consistent with the City's General Plan, and was approved, subject to the
conditions recommended by the City Planning Co~maission. MOTION CARRIED.
VARIA2,~CE NO. 2763 AND E.I.R. NO. 161iTENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 9133~ 9135 Ai4D
9136): Application of Anaheim Hills, Inc., for the following Code waiver to
establish a 147-1ot RS-500(] (SC) single-family subdivision on RS-A-43,000 (SC)
zoned property located on the southerly side of Serrano Avenue, east of Nohl
Ranch Road, was submitted together with E.I.R. No. 161;
a. Minimum lot width.
The City Planning Con~ission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-261, recom-
mended that the City Council certify E.I.R. No. 161 as being in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act and further granted Variance No. 2763
subject to conditions. ,
ENVIRON~.~NTAL I~7ACT REPORT NO. 161 - CERTIFICATION: E.I.R. No. 161 having
been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the City Planning Commission
to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of California
Environmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such information and
belief does hereby certify, on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by
Councilman Sneegas, that E.I.R. No. 161 is in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines. MOTION CARRIED.
Yhe City Council took no further action on Variance No. 2763.
TEi,~TAYIVE TFetCT NOS. 9133 9_~_~_~134 9135 and 9136 _(VARIA2[CE NO. 2763.~ E.I.R. NO.
~ Developer, Anaheim Hills, Inc.; property located south of Serrano
Avenue, east of i~ohl Ranch Road; Tract No. 9133 containing 44 proposed RS-5000
75-1132
City dall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 30~ 1975~ 1:30 P.i~i.
zoned lots; Tract No. 9134 containing 29 proposed RS-5000 zoned lots; Tract
0135 containing 44 proposed RS-_SOOq zoned lots and Tract No. 9136 containing 29
proposed RS-5000 zoned lots.
Tl/e City Planning Co:~m~ission at their meeting held December 8, 1975,
approved Tentative :~p of Tract No. 9133, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative ~lap of Tract No. 9133 is granted
subject to the approval of Variance ~o. 2763.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof si~all be sub:aitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That in accordance with City Council policy, an open, decorative fence
si~ailar to other properties at the top of the slope shall be constructed on the
north property line separat{ng Lot 1;os. 1 throush 20 and Serrano Avenue.
Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in
the unce~aented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of
said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the
approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance; and following installa-
tion and acceptance, the City of Anahei~ si~all assume the responsibility for
maintenance of said landscaping.
4. That all lots within this tract si~all be served by underground
utilities.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
County Recorder.
6. That any proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council
approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants,
conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract
~lap.
7. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of tile proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of con,non property and buildings and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purc!~asers of the project.
8. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to
approw~l of a final tract map.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
t}~e appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appro-
priate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
10. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site
sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on
grading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be
borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties through said property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy pern~its. Drainage district reimbursement
agrce~.~ents may be nmde available to the developers of said property upon tt~eir
requ es t.
11. That the alignment and terminal point of storm drains shown on this
tentative tract map shall not be considered final. These drains shall be
subject to precise design considerations and approval of the City Engineer.
12. That grading, excavation and all other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to n~inimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into tile Santa Ama River by storm
water originating from or flowing through this project.
75-1133
City /,Iai..1; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MIi~UTES -December 30, 1975, 1:30 P.M.
, ,,
13. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
14. That all sanitary sewers shall be constructed within public street
rigt~ts-of-way.
15. That all roofing materials shall be noncombustible and approved by the
Anaheim City Fire Department.
16. That a fire fuel break shall be provided at the perimeter of the tract
as required by the ~aheim City Fire Department.
17. That a final parcel map on subject tract shall be filed and recorded
with the Office of the County Recorder prior to approval of the final tract
map.
1.~. That prior to approval of final tract map, petitioner shall secure a
:Superior Court Order vacating Final Tract Hap 8101 per 66499.21 et seq of the
Government Code of California.
19. That petitioner shall conform to all parcel map requirements of 66424
et ~eq of the Government Code of California.
20. That prior to the approval of the finai tract map, tile petitioner
M~ail submit final specific floor and house plans and elevations to the
Planning Cormnission for approval.
Tim City Planning Cmmnission, at their meeting held December 8, 1975,
approved Tentative l~ap, Tract No. 9134, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9134 is granted
subject to the approval of Variance No. 2763.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
County Recorder.
5. That any proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council
approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants,
conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with tile final tract
la.a p.
6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of ghe proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure nmintenance of co~m~on property and buildings and such other infor~mtion
as the City Attorney ~my desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to
approval of a final tract map.
d. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appro-
priate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the buildin~
peruit is issued.
9. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site
sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on
grading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall be provided tile City that such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condmm~ation proceedings therefor (tile costs of which shall be
borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties through said property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
stmll be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to tile issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district rei~nbursement
agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their
re ques t.
75-1134
City ttall~ .Anahei.~ California - COUiiCIL MIiIUTLS - December 30~ 19.75~ 1:30 P.~-I.
10. That grading, excavation and all other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to mini~,~ize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project bein~ carried into the Santa Ana River by stor~a
water originating from or flowing through this project.
11. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
12. That all sanitary sewers shall be constructed within public street
rights-of-way.
13. That all roofing r~mterials shall be noncombustible and approved by the
Anahei~ City Fire Department.
14. That a fire fuel break shall be provided at the perimeter of the tract
as required by the Anaheim City Fire Department.
15. That a final parcel map on subject tract shall be filed and recorded
with the County Recorder prior to approval of the final tract map.
16. That a minimum 15-foot wide paved vehicular access easement shall be
provided to the inlet of any draina~e facilities alonS the tract boundary which
is intended to be dedicated to the city.
17. That prior to approval of final tract map~ petitioner shall secure a
Superior Court Order vacating Final Tract l{ap 8101 per 66499.21 et seq of the
Govern~.~ent Code of California.
lq. That petitioner shall confor~a to all parcel map requirements of 66426
et seq of the Government Code of California.
19. That prior to the approval of the final tract ~ap, the petitioner
shall submit final specific floor and l~ousc plans and elevations to the
Planning Conm~ission for approval.
fi~e City Planning Co~m~ission, at their me£tin}~ held Oece~nber ~, 1975,
approved Tentative ~-lap, Tract ~-~o. 9135, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative ~.~ap of Tract No. 9135 is granted
subject to the approval of Variance Uo. 2763.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
County Recorder.
5. That any proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be
submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council
approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants,
conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract
map.
6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall sub~.~it
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of co~:~aon property and buildings and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
7. That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to
approval of a final tract map.
~. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
9. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site
sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on
grading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated conde~nation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be
borne t~y the developer) prior to the cormaencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties through said property to
ultimate disposal as approved by thc City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
75-1135
City ilall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MI,'~UTES - December. 301 19751 1:30 P.M.
sllall be tile first item of construction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the dovn~stream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy pcr~:~its. Drainage district reimbursement
a%reements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their
request.
10. That grading, excavation and all otl~er construction activities shall
be conducted in such a ~,mnner so as to mini~lize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being5 carried into the Sanga Ana River by storm
water originating from or flowing through this project.
11. If per:~nent street na~:~e signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
12. That all sanitary sewers shall be constructed within public street
rights-of-way.
13. That all roofing ~terials shall be noncombustible and approved by the
Anaheim City Fire Department.
14. That a fire fuel break shall be provided at the perimeter of the tract
as required by the Anahei~a City Fire Department.
15. That a final parcel map on subject tract shall be filed and recorded
with the County Recorder prior to approval of the final tract map.
16. That a minimum 15-foot wide paved vehicular access easement shall be
provided to the inlet of any drainage facilities along the tract boundary wl~ich
is intended to be dedicated to tile city.
17. That prior to approval of final tract map, petitioner shall secure a
Superior Court Order vacating Final Tract ~p 8101 per 66499.21 et seq of the
Government Code of California.
1,q. That petitioner shall conform to ali parcel map requirements of 66426
et seq of the Government Code of California.
19. That prior to the approval of tile final tract nmp, tile petitioner
shall submit final specific floor and house plans and elevations to the
Planning Commission for approval.
The City Planning Co~m~ission, at their meeting held December 8, 1975,
approved Tentative l, lnp, Tract No. 9136, subject ~o the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9136 is granted
subject to the approval of Variance No. 2763.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That in accordance with City Council policy, an open, decorative' fence
similar to other properties at tile top of the slope shall be constructed on the
north property line separating Lot Nos. 1 through 4; Lot Nos. 7 through 9 and
Serrano Avenue. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall
be installed in the uncenented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full
distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and
subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway b~aintenance; and
following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the
responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
County Recorder.
6. That any proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be
sub~aitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council
approval of the final tract map, and, further, that th~ approved covenants,
conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with tile final tract
~:~ p ·
7. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure ~.~intenance of commo- property and buildings and sucl~ other information
as tl~e City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
S. That street names sl~all be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to
approval of a final tract map.
~. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
tl~e apt~ropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
75-1136
City liall, Anaheim~ California - COU~{CIL I, II~{UTES
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at thc ~i~ae ~he building
permit i~ issued.
lQ. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner
~anisf~c~ory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site
sufficient grading is required to necessitate a sr~ding permi~ no woFk o~
orad~no will be pe~itteq between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
l'ositive assurance shall be provided tlm City t]~at such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October ljth. ~{ecessary right-of-way for off-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated conde~ation proceedings therefor (tl~e costs of which shall be
borne ~)y the developer) prior to the co~aencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties througl~ said property
ulti~mte disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from ti~e do~stream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement
agreements ~y be ~de available to the developers of said proper~y upon ~hcir
11. That grading, excavation and all other constructiou activities shall
be conducted in such a ~nner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into the Santa Aha River by s~Orln
water originating from or flowing throug]~ tl~is project.
12. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, ~emporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
13. That all sanitary se~ers shall be constructed within public street
rights-of-way.
14. That Street "A" shall be 54 feet in width.
15. That all roofing materials shall be nonco~abustible and approved by the
Anaheira City Fire Department.
16. That a fire fuel break shall be provided at the perimeter of the tract
as reqnired by the Anaheim City Fire Department.
17. That a final parcel nap on subject tract shall be filed and recorded
witl~ the Office of the County Recorder prior to approval of the final tract
~ap.
18. That prior to approval of final tract ~mp, petitioner shall secure a
Superior Court Order vacating Final Tract Map 8101 per 664q9.21 et seq of the
Goverm~ent Code of California.
19. That petitioner shall confom:~ to all parcel map requirements of 66426
et seq of the Government Code of California.
20. That prior to the approval of t]~e final tract map, the petitioner
shall submit final specific floor and t~ouse plans and elevations to the
Planning Co:~ission for approval.
in response to Co-ncilwoman Kas~ood's question pertaining to Lot i'~o. A
which is designated to remain as open space, Miss Santalahti advised that the
maintenance of this area would be the responsibility of the ~andatory ho~te-
o~-a~ers association and would have to be landscaped in accordance with require-
ments of the Subdivision 1~Iap Act.
l, ir. Charles A. Reynolds, Civil Engineer, clarified that certain portions
of Lot ~o. A would be left in their natural state, lie illustrated with a map
of subject area the slope bank to be created and advised that it will be
irrigated and landscaped.
Councilwoman iiaywood suggested that the developer consider using fire
retardant plant materials in his landscaping plans and was advised by
Mr. Reynolds that they have already discussed this ~tter with the Fire
l~arshal.
On ~otion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, Tentative
~hps, Tract ~os. 9133, 9134, 9135 and 9136~ together with their design and
i~'q~rovcments were found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and were
approved, subject to the conditions reco~mnended by the City Planning
Co~ission. ~DTIOi~ CARRIED.
75-1137
City~_!t. all~ ih~aheira~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - December 30~ 1975~ 1:30 t'.~,I.
PETITION REQUESTING BLOCK WALL AND UPDATED LIGHTING - 1800 BLOCK OF CHANTICLEER
IIOAD: Petition containing 15 signatures and letter from l~ay Spencer, ldO7
Chanticleer Road regarding the problems encountered by residents on the 1800
block of Chanticleer Road due to use of their street for access to and from
Loara ltigh School grounds, was submitted· Said petition requests that the
Council consider installation of a brick wall without access gate ~o Lears
School grounds at the end of Chanticleer Road and further that the lighting on
that street be updated.
Also submitted were reports from the City Engineer, City Attorney's Office
and Police Department indicating that if such fence were built, it would have
to be placed on school property and therefore would constitute an improper use
of City funds. In addition, the closure of this access to the school grounds
would most likely generate additional complaints from other citizens in the
area,
Ti~e ~yor asked if Hr. Spencer or any other citizen spokesman from that
area was present and received no response.
()n motion by Councilman Sey~aour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council determined not to erect a block wall at the end of the lO00 block of
Chanticleer Road and further directed the Utilities Department to prepare a
report on the possibility of updating lighting and the attendant costs. HOTIO~
CARRIFD.
RECESS: Councilman Thom moved for a ten-~ainute recess. Councilwoman Kaywood
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:25 P.H.)
AFTER iCiCESS: I'h~yor Thom called the meeting to order, all Members of the City
Council being present· (3:35 P.H.)
TIbiCT ~O. ~831 - APPROVAL OF FIliAL FLOOR FL~..~S~ ELEVATIONS~ SITE PLAi~AND SOU2~D
ATTEi~ATION ?H~]ASUFdCS: Request for Council approval of final floor plans, eleva-
tions, site plan and sound attenuation r~masures in conjunction with Tentative
Tract lie. :~831, was submitte,.1 together with report from the Planning Department
reco~aaending subject items be denied on the basis that they do not conform to
Council Policy .~o 54n
· .~. wi~ich does not permit residential units less than 1.,30
feet from the railroad tracks to be constructed, 9 lots in said tract being
witl~in the 100-foot setback area varying from a distance of 71 to 90 feet from
the railroad tracks.
Council~.%an Seymour moved to deny final floor plans, elevations, site plan
and sound attenuation z~easures proposed for Tract No. $~31. Councilwoman
Ka?~,ood seconded the ~'aotion.
Prior to voting on the foregoing motion, the t-iayor recognized Hr. Mike
Jager, 20951 Brookhurst Street, ituntington Beach, who stated that they received
City Council approval of this tentative map on February 11, 1975; that they
have moved all of the two-story homes out of the lO0-foot setback area from the
railroad tracks; that they have received approval and are under construction on
an adjacent tract (Tract No. 7422) with essentially the same environmental
conditions as subject tract; that the sound attenuation wall would be over the
top of the homes in this tract· tie stressed that when the tentative map was
approved on February 11, 1975, Council Policy No. 542 had not yet been adopted.
To move these homes out of the 100-foot setback from the railroad tracks would
necessitate an entirely new set of plans at considerable expense· lie advised
that he had employed Dr. John tlilliard of Bio-Acoustical Engineering
Corporation to work with them on the other sound attenuation measures to be
provided in Tract No.
oo31.
Discussion ensued between Mr. Jager and the City Council relaeive to the
possibility of reducing the front setback on certain of these lots to between
six to ten feet with automatic garage door openers in order to move the
structures themselves as far from the railroad tracks as possible. Ramifica-
tions of such shortened driveways on the parking spaces available in this sub-
division were discussed, and Councilwoman Kaywood inquired whether it would be
possible to increase the garages to three-car capacity, to which Mr. Jager
replied negatively. The site plan was reviewed with Mr. Jager at the Council
table. It was noted that it would be possible to move five of the nine
structures further from the railroad track if front setbacks were reduced.
75-1133
City tlall; Anaheim; California - COUi'~CIL MINUTES - December 30~ 1.975~ 1:30 P.;I.
;Ir. Jager stipulated to revising the placement of structures on Lot Nos.
_°4, 25, 79, gQ and 31 to six to ten feet with automatic garage door openers.
At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Seymour withdrew his previous
motion to deny the final floor plans, elevations, site plans and sound attenua-
tion measures for Tract
Councilman Seymour reeved that the final floor plans, elevations, site
plans and sound attenuation measures for Tract Its. 8831 be approved, subject to
°5 79 30 and Gl being revised to six- to
the front setbacks on Lot Nos. 24, ~ , ,
ten-foot setbacks with auto~aatic garage door openers, thereby waiving the
provisions of Council Policy Ho. 542 as it pertains to certain lots within
Tract ;;o. 3,331, on the basis that the tentative map for this tract was approved
prior to adoption of said Council Policy. Councilraan Pebley seconded the
notion. To this motion, Councilwonan Kas~ood voted "no". HOTION CARRII]]).
?,ESOLUTIO?? JO. 75R-67..~ - AI.IA:~,) OF WO;IF, OtLDER IJOS. 764-B AI.JD 862: In accordance
with reco~:uaendations of t!te City Engineer, Councilman Seymour offered
~,esolution No. 75R-67'~ for adopt{on.
;iefer to llesolution Book.
A i'dJSOLUTION OF TiiE CITY COUJCIL OF T;iE CITY OF AN~iEIi. I ACCEPTI:~G A $i;ALLo P~iO-
POSAL ~{D A~/A~)I~;G A COi~TF&CT TO Tit;] LOWEST RESPOfiSIBLE BIDDER FOIl T~iE FUiLIlSi~-
I~iG OF ~L Pki~lT, LABOR, SERVICI~S, i~kTEi{IALS AND EqUIPHEJT ~;D ALL UTILITIES
A].ID TIF~;~S].'OiiTATIOi~, L~CLUDI~4G POWER, FUi;L ~i) IJATER, AiiD PEI~'O~IING ALL WOR~i
~J~'w~ Ti.E FOLLOUIiIG PUBLIC II'iPROV~i'I~iiT; LI'IGOL, 4
AVEi;Ui.; 3TREET I}~';{OVEi~i~T~ W/O SUiA~I3T STP~ET, I:~ Tile CITY OF ~AiiEIH, WO~[
ORDER ~OS. 764-B ~U.ID ~ ~
..>6~. (Griffith Company - ~25,837.30)
~o!1 Call Vote:
AYES: COUHCIL I-'iEiLBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COU:,ICIL ?~,':~,~Ra: None
A~,~iT: COUNCIL HEi~Ei{S; None
The ~iayor declared Resolution No. 75R-67~3 duly passed and adopted.
ORDI2,I~U;CE ~,~O. 3492: Council~aan Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3492 for adoption.
Refer to ()rdinance Book.
~Ug ()i[DIi4AiICE OF Tile CiTY OF AjDaiEIf4 Ai.~:~DI;~G ORDIiIANCE NO. 1445 RELATING TO
ZOiIlNG. (Deleting Condition No. 2 thereof, 59-60-65 readvertised)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL I.IEllB£RS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COU[~CIL .'.~.],~.IBERS: None
ABSENT: COUJCIL ~IE,'IBERS: i'~one
The I.~yor declared Ordinance No. 3492 duly passed and adopted.
ORDI,I~;CE NO. 3493: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3493 for first
reading.
~UI ORDIi/~CE OF THE CITY OF ANAltEIIi ~,~NDING TITLE 17, CIiAPTER 17.08 OF TiiE
~.~AIiEIiI :~NICIPAL CODE BY REPEALING SECTIONS 17.08.240, 17.08.250, 17.08.260,
17.08.340, 17.08.350 AND 17.08.360, &,ID ADDING THERETO NEW SECTIONS. (Park in-
lieu fees)
ORDINA:;CE NO. 3494: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3494 for first
read '
ln~.
,klJ OtIDIJA/ICE OF TIlE CITY OF ANAItEIH A2iENDING TITLE 13 OF TIlE A~AIIEIi'I Hb2{ICIPAL
CODE i~ELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-9 (4), CL)
SOUi~D D~M[RIER~ ROUTE 57 FREEWAY: Councilwoman Ka~eood reported that she had pre-
sented a request to the SCAG Transportation-Utilities Committee that the sound
barrier and site screening for Route 57 Freeway receive a priority designation.
75-1139
City liall~ Anahei~n~ California - COUi.~CIL MIUUTES - December 30~ 1975~ 1:30 P.ii.
AijA;IEI~'I B]1AUTIFUL PI.'OJI,]CT - 1,~Ai~CIiESTEit A~O BROADWAY; Xayor Thom introduced a
letter from Anaheim Beautiful rez~ard~ng the City s entrance into a lease a~ree-
ncnt with Southern Pacific P, ailroad to facilitate the proposed Bicentennial
project at ~[anchester and Broadway.
Tt~e City Attorney advised that he has a copy of the proposed lease and
will report back in apt)ro::iraately two weeks witl~ reco~lendation.
ADJOUtUIiH,'.iIT: Councilwo~,mn Kaywood ~aoved to adjourn. Councilman Seymour seconded
tt~e motion.
Adjourned: 4:10 P.H.
~LLOXA Il. HOUGARD, CITY CLEPdi