Loading...
2004-097RESOLUTION NO. 2004R- 97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2 AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NOS. 94R-236 AND 94R-237 ACCORDiNGLY TO ANNEX AND RECLASSIFY PROPERTIES iNTO THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA. WHEREAS, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 18.93 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, on September 20, 1994, the City Council of the City of Anaheim has heretofore adopted its Resolution No. 94-236 approving the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) and Resolution No. 94R-237 approving Zoning and Development Standards with conditions of approval for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan making certain findings in co, unction therewith pursuant to Chapter 18.93; and WHEREAS, Specific Plan No. 92-2 provides a long range, comprehensive plan for future development within the Anaheim Resort including zoning and development standards, design guidelines and a public facilities plan, and permits the development of hotel/motel, convention, retail and other visitor-serving uses; and WHEREAS, in connection with the adoption of Specific Plan No. 92-2, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94R-234 certifying Environmental Impact Report No. 313, with a Statement of Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085; and WHEREAS, on May 20, 1997, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 97R-74, amending Resolution Nos. 94R-236 and 94R-237, relating to Amendment No. 1 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which amendment revised the legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by reclassifying and incorporating a 4.67-acre parcel into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone; and WHEREAS, on October 12, 1998, the Planning Commission denied Amendment No. 2 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, to amend the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to the addition of"Coffee House" as a conditionally, permitted accessory use in conjunction with an automobile service station and the petition was subsequently withdrawn by the applicant at the January 26, 1999 City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5685 amending Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 1 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which adjustment amended the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to structural setbacks and yard requirements to reflect the local street status of Convention Way; and WHEREAS, on July 27, 1999, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 97R-74, · amending Resolution Nos. 94R-236 and 94R-237, relating to Amendment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which amendment revised the legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by reclassifying and incorporating a 0.73-acre parcel into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5703 amending Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 2 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which adjustment amended the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to the minimum landscape setback requirement for properties adjacent to Manchester Avenue between Katella Avenue and the southern boundary of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area; and WHEREAS, on May 1, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5769 amending Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 3 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which adjustment amended the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to temporary parking requirements; and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5910 amending Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 4 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, which adjustment proposes to amend the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to office uses in a legal non-conforming building; and WHEREAS, a fourth amendment to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, to amend the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to streamlined project processing has been incorporated into the City's Zoning Code Update; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2004, pursuant to Chapters 18.03 and 18.93 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the Anaheim City Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2004-22, initiated Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (for the purpose of presenting applications for study and consideration at a public hearing) for an approximate 27-acre area (hereafter referred to as the expansion area) located immediately south of the existing Specific Plan boundaries along the east and west sides of Harbor Boulevard between Orangewood Avenue and the southern ,City limits including properties fronting along the following streets (all frontage numbers are approximate): 1,363 feet adjacent to the west side and 2,641 feet adjacent to the east side of Harbor Boulevard; 626 feet adjacent to the south side of Orangewood Avenue, east and west of the centerline of Harbor Boulevard, 371 feet adjacent to the north and south sides of Wilken Way, west of the centerline of Harbor Boulevard; 190 linear feet on the north side and 608 linear feet on the south side, east of the centcrline of Harbor Boulevard; and, 850 feet adjacent to the north side of Chapman Avenue, east of the centerline of Harbor Boulevard. Property addresses include 2101-2207 South Harbor Boulevard, 2100-2340 South Harbor Boulevard, 500-510 and 614 West Orangewood Avenue, 450,460 and 620 West Wilken Way, and 421,503, and 531 West Chapman Avenue, located in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California and as dep!cted in Attachment A to this Resolution; and WHEREAS, as part of the General Plan Update, the General Plan land use designation for the expansion area was redesignated from General Commercial to Commercial Recreation; and that Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 amends said document to be consistent with the revised General Plan land use designation; and WHEREAS, the expansion area is located adjacent to the approximate 1,052-acre Anaheim Resort, which is designated on the City of Anaheim General Plan for Commercial Recreation land uses; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 is proposed to revise the legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by reclassifying and incorporating the subject properties within the expansion area from the CL (Commercial, Limited), CH (Commercial, Heavy), CO (Commercial, General), RSA-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural), and PLD-M (Parking/Landscape District - Manufacturing) Zones to the SP92-2 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, C-R District) Zone; amend Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Section 7.0 (Zoning and Development Standards) of the Specific Plan) to reflect said reclassification as set forth in Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029; and, incorporate an Addendum (Attachment B) to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan document; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan identifies maximum development densities for all properties in the Zone, and that the subject properties are proposed to be designated "Low Density" allowing up to 50 hotel/motel rooms per gross acre or 75 hotel/motel rooms per lot or parcel existing on the date of adoption of said Specific Plan Amendment, whichever is greater; ~-~ i~l. lll,.l WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard on April 19, 2004, at 1:30 P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said Specific Plan Amendment and investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and. study made by itself and on its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. PC2004-48 finding and recommending that the City Council (1) determine that Final EIR No. 330 and Mitigation Monitoring Program 0085A associated with The Anaheim Resort are in compliance with CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Actions; (2) adopt Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 to amend the Zoning and Development Standards and incorporate an Addendum into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 document as set forth in Attachment B to this Resolution; and, (3) reclassify the above described properties from the CL (Commercial, Limited), Cid (Commercial, Heavy), CG (Commercial, General), RS-A-43,000 (Residential/ Agricultural), and PLD-M (Parking/Landscape District - Manufacturing) zones to the SP92-2 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, C-R District with a Low De, nsity designation) zone; and WHEREA S, upon receipt o f said Resolution, summary o f evidence, report o f findings and recommendations of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, the City Council did fix the 25th of May, 2004, as the time, and the City Council Chambers in the Civic Center as the place for a public hearing on said proposed Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council did duly hold and conduct said public hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard, and did receive evidence, testimony and reports, and the recommendations and findings of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2004-48; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), on May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City Council, by its Resolution No. 2004R- certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, adopting Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419, the amended monitoring program described as Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 112 for The Platinum Triangle, and the amended monitoring program described as Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85a for The Anaheim Resort; determined that said Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320 fully complies with CEQA, reflects the independent judgment of the City Council, and is adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for (i) General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419, (ii) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, (iii) Reclassification No. 2004-00117, (iv) Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. ~2-2, (v) Amendment No. 2 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1, and (vii) future discretionary actions described in Environmental Impact Report No. 330; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 by its Resolution No. 2004- , amending the Land Use Element of the General Plan to change the current land use designation for the Property from "General Commercial" to the "Commercial Recreation" land use designation; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after due consideration of the recommendations and findings of the Ariaheim City Planning Commission set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 2004-48, and all evidence, testimony and reports offered at said hearing, does hereby find that Amendment No. 5 is consistent with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, and further finds: A. That the property proposed for this specific plan has unique site characteristics such as topography, location or surroundings which are enhanced by special land use and development standards in that it is located immediately adjacent to the existing Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area. Development of visitor-serving uses in accordance with the Specific Plan development standards along Harbor Boulevard between Orangewood Avenue and the southern city limits would provide for enhanced aesthetics and visitor-serving opportunities along this corridor which provides an entry to The Anaheim Resort. B. That the proposed specific plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the Anaheim General Plan as amended and with the purposes, standards, and land use guidelines therein in that the expansion area is proposed to be redesignated to the Commercial Recreation land use designation as part of the General Plan Update Program. The proposed amendment would implement the Commercial Recreation land use designation, goals and policies. C. That the proposed specific plan results in development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood in that incorporation and reclassification of the expansion area into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would encourage development of new quality facilities which complement the existing convention and visitor-serving uses in The Anaheim Resort and provide for the amendment area to be developed with enhanced development and signage standards. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment standards also address development standards (i.e., height and setback requirements) to minimize the impact of commercial development on adjacent residential neighborhoods. D. That the proposed specific plan amendment contributes to a balance of land uses in the City of Anaheim in that the proposed amendment would provide for the extension of Anaheim Resort visitor-serving uses along Harbor Boulevard to the southern city limits and would provide for a balance of land uses by providing a compatible transition between residential and commercial uses. E. That the proposed specific plan respects environmental and aesthetic resources consistent with economic realities. The expansion area would be subject to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan zoning and development standards (as proposed for amendment) and design guidelines and Mitigation Monitoring Program 0085A. WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 legal description (Attachment A) and Addendum (Attachment B) are attached to this resolution and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, proposed changes to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zoning and Development Standards reflecting the reclassification of the subject properties are incorporated into Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029 and are incorporated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Resolution Nos. 94R-236 and 94R-237, as previously amended, be, and the same are hereby amended to reclassify and incorporate subject Properties from the CL (Commercial, Limited), CH (Commercial, Heavy), CG (Commercial, General), RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural), and PLD-M (Parking/Landscape District - Manufacturing) zones to the SP92-2 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, C-R District with a Low Density designation) zone; incorporate an Addendum into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 document as set forth in Attachment B to this Resolution, which attachment is hereby incorporated herein as though set forth in full; and, revise the legal description and the depiction of the Legal Description Areas set forth as Attachment A to Ordinance No. 5454 to add the expansion area as set forth in Attachment A to this Resolution, which attachment is incorporated herein by this reference subject to the following conditions: 1. That completion of these reclassification proceedings to amend the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 is contingent upon .the City Council's adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029. 2. That the expansion area shall be subject to all of the conditions of approval adopted by City Council on September 27, 1994 in connection with the prior approval of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 as set forth in Ordinance No. 5454 and incorporated herein by reference. 3. That the expansion area shall be subject to all of the mitigation measures in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 00§ 5 a as set forth by General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 and its associated Final EIR No. 330 and incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Council does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each and all of the conditions set forth above. Should any such condition, or and part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approval herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that nothing contained in this resolution shall apply to certain projects submitted to the City prior to July 8, 2004, which may continue to completion subject to existing development standards in effect on July 7, 2004, if they satisfy one of the following: 1. Any project that received a valid building permit as of 5 p.m. on July 7, 2004, shall be permitted provided that construction shall have commenced and shall be completed within a period of 365 days from the date the building permit was issued, unless said time period is duly extended by the Building Official. 2. Nothing contained in this resolution shall apply to any project that is in plan check as of 5 p.m. on July 7, 2004. Such project shall be permitted provided that a valid building permit shall have been obtained within a period of 180 days from July 8, 2004, and construction shall have commenced and shall be completed within a period of 365 days from the date the building permit is issued, unless said time period is duly extended by the Building Official. 3. Nothing contained in this resolution shall apply to any project that has obtained any zoning entitlement (Administrative Adjustment, Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Parcel Map, Tentative Tract Map, Variance, etc.) that has been approved by the Planning Commission, City Council or Zoning Administrator as of 5 p.m. on July 7, 2004. Said project shall be permitted provided that such project shall have commenced within the time limitation specified in the Resolution adopted by the Planning Commission or the City Council, or in the Decision if approved by the Zoning Administrator, unless said time period is duly extended by the approval authority; and ifa building permit is required, construction shall have commenced and shall be completed within a period of 365 days from the date the building permit is issued, unless said time period is duly extended by the Building Official. Previously-approved entitlements which expire after the effective date of the ordinance and are not granted an extension of time by the approval authority shall be subject to the new Zoning Code. 4. Nothing contained in this resolution shall apply to any project that has submitted any zoning entitlement (Administrative Adjustment, Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Parcel Map, Tentative Tract Map, Variance, etc.) to the Planning Department and is deemed complete by staff'as of 5 p.m. on the day before the effective date of the ordinance. Said project shall be permitted provided that the proposal is approved or conditionally approved by the Planning Commission, City Council or Zoning Administrator; and that such project shall have commenced within the time limitation specified in the Resolution adopted by the Planning Commission or the City Council, or in the Decision if approved by the Zoning Administrator, unless said time period is duly extended by the approval authority; and if a building permit is required, construction shall have commenced and shall be completed within a period of 365 days from the date the building permit is issued, unless said time period is duly extended by the Building Official. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, except as expressly amended herein, Resolution Nos 94R-236 and 94R-237 and Specific Plan No. 92-2, as previously amended, shall remain in full force and effect. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this ZSt-h day of May ,2004, by the following roll call vote: AYES' NOES: Mayor Curt Pringle, Council Members, Tait, Chavez, M~Cracken no~e ABSENT: Hernandez ABSTAIN: none CITY (~NAHEIM ~~} ATTEST: ~ITY CLEaRK O~F THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 54208.1Xsim\May 18, 2004 Attachment A Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Expansion Area Legal Description 626 ' 371 ORANGEWOOD AVE. I[ II Attachment A Legal Description -ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN EXPANSION AREA LEGEND C, IAnaheim Resort Specific Plan !--"1 Anaheim Resort Specific PlanN Expansion Area 0 75 150 30~eet ~/'~~ Map Created: March 29, 2004 ~ ; L_ ) L I CLIFFWOOD AVE CLIFFW, 418 ' --~-----.-~.. TILLER AVE 296 ' ~ 524 ' 848' CHAPMAN AVENUE SIRIUS AVE 1200A(2004-4-1.5) Attachment B Addendum to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Anaheim Resort Expansion Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 On June _, 2004, The Anaheim City Council adopted Ordinance No. ~ approving Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, incorporating approximately 26.4 acres along Harbor Boulevard, south of Orangewood Avenue, to the Anaheim City Limits (see Exhibit A - Specific Plan Expansion Area), into the approximate 555-acre Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Zone, C-R District (see Exhibit B - Development Summary Plan), increasing The Anaheim Resort to 1,078 acres (See Exhibit C - The Anaheim Resort Boundaries). Land Use Existing land uses within the expansion area at the time of the amendment include a mix of commercial uses including hotels, restaurants, retail and professional offices (see Exhibit D - Existing Land Use). Zoning Designations Prior to reclassification to the SP92-2 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2) Zone, properties within the expansion area were designated CL (Commercial, Limited), CH (Commercial, Heavy), CG (Commercial, General), RSA-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural), and PLD-M (Parking/Landscape District - Manufacturing) (see Exhibit E - Zoning Prior to Reclassification to the SP 92-2 Zone). Permitted Uses Properties within the expansion area may develop per the land use and development standards of the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Code Section 18.116.070). However, hotels and motels, which are permitted primary uses and structures within the C-R District, north of Orangewood Avenue, require a conditional use permit when developed south of Orangewood Avenue within the expansion area. Development Density The expansion area is designated Low Density (see Exhibit F - C-R District Development Density Plan), which allows for up to 50 hotel/motel rooms per gross acre or 75 hotel/motel rooms per lot or parcel existing on the date of adoption of Amendment 5, whichever is greater. This density designation will allow for up to approximately 2,775 hotel/motel rooms to be built in the expansion area and up to approximately 28,675 hotel/motel rooms to be built within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area. Public Facilities/Mitiqation Monitoring Program EIR No. 330 in conjunction with GPA 2004-00419 (2004 General Plan Update) analyzed public improvements and other related environmental impacts for the amended area. Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085A was created for the amended area and specific mitigation monitoring plans will be created, incorporating mitigation measures within the monitoring program, for new development within the amended area. Public Realm The Public Works Department will determine improvements required within the public realm. For further information, please contact the Public Works Department. Buildinq Hei.qht Limitations The maximum structural height of any building or structure within the expanded area, including roof-mounted equipment, shall not exceed the maximum height defined by the Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Maximum Permitted Structural Height Map for the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue; however, any building located adjacent to a residential zone is limited to a maximum building height equal to one-half the distance from the building to the residential zone boundary, unless otherwise approved by a conditional use permit. ,Buildinq Setbacks Adjacent to Public Riqht-of-Way The minimum building setback along Harbor Boulevard, O~:angewood Avenue and Chapman Avenue is consistent with setback requirements for properties located adjacent to Major, Primary and Secondary Arterial Roads. The minimum setback for buildings seventy-five feet tall or'less shall be 20 feet; for buildings greater than seventy-five feet, the minimum setback shall be 30 feet. The minimum building setback adjacent to Acama Street, Mallul Drive and Wilken Way are consistent with setback requirements for local streets. The minimum setback for buildings three stories or less shall be ten feet; for buildings greater than three stories, the minimum setback shall be twenty feet. Tree Density Tree densities within required setbacks along Harbor Boulevard, ©rangewood Avenue and Wilken Way shall be "Moderately Dense", with the exception of that portion of Wilken Way where said street is also the boundary of the specific plan; setbacks along this boundary and all other setbacks of the amended area that are adjacent to the specific plan boundary shall have a tree density of "Very Dense" (see Exhibit G - Tree Density Plan). Le.qal Non-Conforming Signs Signs and/or any other advertising displays or structures which do not comply with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan shall be removed, altered or replaced within fifteen years after the adoption of Amendment No. 5 or on or before December 31,2019, whichever is later. However, the abatement will not be required unless the owner of said sign has received advance written notice from the Planning Director requiring the removal or alteration of sign. 371 ORANGEWOOD AVE. CLIFFWOOD AVE Exhibit A SPECIFIC PLAN EXPANSION AREA LEGEND ~ IAnaheim Resort Specific Plan ~/~llAnaheim Resort Specific Plan Expansion Area N 0 75 150 30~eet Map Created: March 29, 2004 s ) L. J WILKEN WAY L I CLIFFW TILLER AVE 296 ' '~ 524 CHAPMAN AVENUE SIRIUS AVE 1200A (2004-4-14) BALL ROAD lmm m m m DISNEY WAY Exhibit B DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY PLAN Legend [ ' 3 The Anaheim Resort Development Districts I C-R (Development Area 1) ~'~ P-R (Development Area 2) Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay Zone within the C-R District ~'~ Central Core m m · Designated for Future Extension in General Plan Circulation Element N 0 300 600 l l2~eet ~'~[I" ]~ Map Created: Februa~ 10, 2004 KATELLA AVENUE PACIFICO AVENUE u--'L~~,"',',',','/lll~~ mmli o..~.~oo,:,'.~',:,~'~ ~i ,~-~-~ ~~-~- /t,:/l' ~'- r'llllllllll D~r' BALL ROAD ~ The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ~ELL^ AVE. UE,~ i [¢ ~ Expansion Area ~ ~ [] Designated for Future Extension in General Plan Circulation Element N ~,, Map Created: Februan/10, 2004 g ~i ~!__DISNEY WAY ~ LL.LJl I [ I I I I I I I I I I I I [ __ CHAPMAN AVENUE PAClFICO AVENUE iOR^N~OO---~FNU~--~F] t i i I i ] i i i Ui ~ ~-~ 1200C(288~-4-14) mm m __mmm~ m -- -- -- ii iiim m [ I'-- ! ORANGEWOOD AVE. CLIFFWOOD AVE Exhibit D EXISTING LAND USE LEGEND {.'~The Anaheim Resort r~,~The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Land Use ~ Commercial ~ Office [/~ RV Park 0 75 150 30¢eet Map Created: February 18, 2004 WILKEN WAY WILl TILLER AVE SIRIUS AVE CHAPMAN AVENUE 1200D(2004.-4-14) ! I ORANGEWOOD AVE. CLIFFWOOD AVE Exhibit E ZONING PRIOR TO RECLASSIFICATION TO SP 92-2 ZONE LEGEND L~The Anaheim Resort ~r."JThe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan ~CG ~CH ['%-~ C L ~ PLD-M ~ RS-A-43000 N w E 0 7,5 150 30~6et -'~. ~- Map Created: February 18. 2004S WlLKEN WAY TILLER AVE SIRIUS AVE CHAPMAN AVENUE 1200E(2004-4-1.4) ! BALL ROAD KATELLA AVENUE · , ~ DISNEY WAY Exhibit F C-R DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT DENSITY PLAN LEGEND ir =_..~The Anaheim Resort DEVELOPMENT DENSITY L'~ convention center Medium ~ Low Density ~ Low-Medium Density ~ Medium Density ~ ~ ,= Designated for Future Extension in General Plan Circulation Element 0 300 ~00 l'20F0eet ~V'~E Map Create(l: February 10, 2004 )NVENTION CHAPMAN AVENUE -- PACIFICO AVENUE 1200F(2004~- 14) CONVENTION WAY I TREE DENSITY PLAN I LEGEND , r 1The Anaheim Resort I I-- r.'JThe Anaheim Resort Specific Plan _ i ~ Moderately Dense I very Dense [ W LAIdlARK DR ~ Map Created: February 18, 2004 _ BLUEBELL AVE..~ .. / / ~ WleKl::N WAY J ~ X rY I I -, CHAPMAN AVENUE 1200G(2004-4- ~ 4)