RA1993/11/30Anahe£m C£v£c Center~ ANAHEI]~4 R~.DEV~.LOPMEN~ AGENCY
NOVEMBER 30, 19~)3, 5:00 P.M.
PRESENT
ABSENT:
PRESENT
AGENCY MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
AGENCY MEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: James Ruth
CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
SECRETARY: Leonora N. Sohl
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Lisa Stipkovich
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment
Agency was posted at 2:45 p.m. on November 24, 1993 at the Civic Center kiosk,
containing all items as shown herein.
Chairman Daly called the regular meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency
to order at 5:43 p.m.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY in the amount of
$265,005.08 for the period ending November 22, 1993 and $51,344.32 for the
period ending November 29, 1993, in accordance with the 1993-94 Budget, were
approved.
ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST: No items of public interest were addressed.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS: Public input received on Agency Item 1 (see
discussion under that item).
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1 - 5: On motion by Agency Member Pickler, seconded by
Agency Member Feldhaus, the following actions were authorized in accordance
with the reports and recommendations furnished each Agency Member and as
listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Agency Member Pickler offered
Resolution Nos. ARA93-24 and ARA93-25 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
Lisa Stipkovich, Executive Director of Community Development. Under Items 1
and 2, she would like to remove from the list of agreements, the agreement by
and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the County of Orange and the
Orange County Flood Control District and to change the resolutions to reflect
the deletion of that agreement in both cases for the Brookhurst Commercial
Corridor Redevelopment Project and the Commercial/Industrial Redevelopment
Project.
Mr. Dick Clark, President, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. There is a letter on
file with the City Clerk and Agency/Council from him supporting the Brookhurst
Redeveloment project (see letter dated November 30, 1993 - made a part of the
record). The Chamber feels it will help improve the economy and local area by
public-private partnership opportunity.
1. 161: RESOLUTION NO. ARA93-24: Authorizing the execution of the following
agreements at such time that the City Council has considered the proposed
Redevelopment Plan for the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Redevelopment
Project and has taken action approving the Ordinance adopting the Plan, and
the governing bodies of the subject taxing agencies have approved the
following agreements:
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
Magnolia Elementary School District.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
County Sanitation District No. 3.
93-83
Anaheim Civic Cen%er~ ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AOENCY
NOVEMBER 30r 1993~ 5~00 P.M.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
Orange County Vector Control District.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
Orange County Water District.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
North Orange County Community College District.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
Orange County Department of Education.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
Anaheim Union High School District.
2. 161: RESOLUTION NO. ARA93-25: Authorizing the execution of the following
agreements at such time that the City Council has considered the proposed
Redevelopment Plan for the Commercial/Industrial Redevelopment Project and has
taken action approving the Ordinance adopting the Plan, and the governing
bodies of the subject taxing agencies have approved the following agreements:
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
County Sanitation District No. 2.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
Orange County Vector Control District.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
Orange County Water District.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
North Orange County Community College District.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
Orange County Department of Education.
An Agreement by and between the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and the
Anaheim Union High School District.
3. 123: Approving the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement between the Housing
Authority and Habitat for Humanity of Orange County, Inc., for the development
and construction of four condominium units for very-low income families.
4. 105: Receiving and filing a Disclosure of Property Interests in
Redevelopment Areas submitted by Julie Mayer.
5. 161: Approving minutes of the Redevelopment Agency meeting held
October 26, 1993.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA93-24: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS BY AND AMONG THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY AND TAXING ENTITIES AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
BROOKHURST COF~MERCIAL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA93-25: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS BY AND AMONG THE ANAHEIM REDVELOPMENT
93-84
Anaheim C~v£c Cen~er~ ANAHSI~ REDSVF. J~PMENT AGSNCY
NOVEMBER 30~ 1993, 5~00 P.M.
AGENCY AND TAXING ENTITIES AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. ARA93-24 and AKA93-25 for adoption~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
AGENCY MEMBERS: None
AGENCY MEMBERS: None
The Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA93-24 and ARA93-25 duly passed and
adopted. Motions and Consent Calendar carried.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR.
RECESS: Agency Member Daly moved to recess to 6:00 p.m. for joint public
hearing with the Community Redevelopment Commission and the City Council.
Agency Member Simpson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:46 p.m.)
Chairman Daly reconvened the meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency.
(6:56 p.m.)
Chairman Paul MacMillan called to order the Community Redevelopment
Commission. (6:56 p.m.) Present were: McMillan, Bostwick, Holguin, Linn,
Perreira, Pinson, Rennet.
D2. 155/161: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/CITY COUNCIL -
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN - BROOKHURST COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT:
To consider and act upon the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the
Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Redevelopment Project.
Submitted was a binder of documents entitled - joint public hearing documents
- proposed Redevelopment plan for the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor
Redevelopment project from the Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission and
the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency dated November 30, 1993 containing all of the
documentation relating to the proposed project as required.
Chairman/Council Member Daly. This is a joint session of the Community
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Anaheim, the Anaheim Redevelopment
Agency and the City Council of the City of Anaheim. The members of the City
Council also sit as members of the Redevelopment Agency.
The purpose of this session is to conduct a joint public hearing to consider
the proposed Redevelopment plan for the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor
Redevelopment project.
A verbatim transcript of the proceedings have been made a part of the record.
Paul MacMillan, Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Commission noted that
Item No. 1 of the Community Redevelopment Commission agenda gives an
opportunity for anyone who wishes to speak on Items of Public Interest or
agenda items under the jurisdiction of the Community Redevelopment Commission
at this time; no one wished to speak.
93-85
Anaheim Civic ten,eFt ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOVEMBER 30r 1993r 5~00 P.M,
Mr. MacMillan also noted that there are no minutes of the Community
Redevelopment Commission to be approved at this time. Item No. 3 of their
agenda is the joint public hearing on the subject proposed redevelopment plan.
Mayor/Chairman Daly. He declared the public hearing on the proposed
Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Redevelopment project open. He thereupon
introduced Lisa Stipkovich, Director of Community Development for the City to
provide background and describe the procedures that will be followed in
conducting the public hearing this evening.
Lisa Stipkovich, Director of Community Development. The State law under which
they are acting is the Community Redevelopment law of the State of California
which is part of the health and safety code and requires that they follow
certain procedures, some of them formal, in the conduct of tonight's joint
public hearing.
Notice of the Joint Public Hearing has been published and mailed as required
by law. The affidavits of publication and mailing of the notice to property
owners and to taxing agencies of this public hearing were submitted to the
City Clerk and are a part of the record.
Mrs. Stipkovich then gave a presentation on the history and background of the
Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Redevelopment Project; the reasons for
undertaking the project; the report to the City Council and the proposed
Redevelopment activities.
Audio tapes from public meetings sponsored by the Community Redevelopment
Commission dated April 21, August 3 and October 25, 1993 and also a video tape
submitted as an attachment to a letter dated July 24, 1992 from Mr. Robert
Spidell commenting on blighted conditions in the area were also made a part of
the record.
In concluding her presentation, Mrs. Stipkovich stated there is one issue she
would like to have Celeste Brady, Special Counsel to the Agency address and
that is the status of the tax-sharing agreement with the County.
Celeste Brady, Special Counsel to the Redevelopment Agency. With regard to
the tax sharing agreement being negotiated with the County, negotiations are
continuing but at the time of this hearing, they have not reached a final
agreement. For purposes of the joint public hearing and submitting a complete
record to the City Council for consideration and action, included in the
record for these proceedings is the offer provided by the Redevelopment Agency
to the County of Orange family of entities which includes the Orange County
General Fund, the Harbors, Beaches and Park's District and the Orange County
Flood Control District. The following is the offer:
That the County General Fund receive 56% of the tax increment net
and inclusive of all State mandated payments by the Redevelopment
Agency, that the Harbors, Beaches and Park's District receive that
same tax sharing arrangement and that the Orange County Flood
Control District receive 100% net of all Agency State mandated
payments as part of the mitigation of the fiscal burden and
detriment that the County may incur in the adoption and approval
of this Redevelopment project. She would also point out that all
items within the agenda binder and all items referenced during the
proceedings this evening are a part of the administrative record
93-86
Anahe4m Civic Cen4:er~ ANAHI~:I:M RI~D~P~ &t3~.NCY
NOVI~MBI~R 30~ 1993,~ 5~00 P.M.
of the project and part of the considerations and actions upon
which the Council/Agency/Commission will take action on tonight.
Lisa Stipkovlch, Director of Community Development. Unless there are any
questions of staff, she suggested that they begin to take public testimony.
Mayor/Chairman Daly. They will now begin taking public testimony and comments
on the adoption of the proposed redevelopment plan. He outlined the process
in taking such testimony. They will start first with written comments.
Lisa Stipkovich. They have not received any written comments at this point.
Mayor/Chairman Daly. Since there are no written comments, they will now hear
any statements, testimony or questions from the audience.
The following people then spoke relative to the adoption of the proposed
Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Redevelopment Plan:
Kelly Kucher, Orange County Administrative Office, speaking on
behalf of the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control
District and Orange County Harbors, Beaches and Park's District.
He is present to speak in opposition. The Agency has not provided
sufficient evidence of blight in the project area to justify the
Redevelopment proposal. In addition, this project would cause a
significant fiscal detriment or burden on the County taxing
entities which has not been mitigated at this point. The County
remains willing to work with the Redevelopment Agency in an
attempt to reach an agreement which would mandate these impacts.
Dick Clark, President, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. They have submitted
a letter of support (previously made a part of the record) on the
adoption of the proposed redevelopment plan. They endorse the project
and the economic benefit to the businesses in the community.
Ron Mullen, 312 N. Monterey, in the proposed redevelopment area. He
represents the Linhurst Association, a group of homeowners by the
intersection of Lincoln and Brookhurst. They have noted in recent years
the continuing increase in vacancies in buildings on the Brookhurst
Corridor from the intersection of the I-5 Freeway all the way down to
the Ball Road area. Businesses are moving out. There is an increase in
graffiti, gang activity and a great increase in prostitution. It is a
blighted area and he takes objection to the gentlemen who said it is
not. On behalf of the owners in the area, they strongly urge the
Council to consider adoption of this redevelopment project.
Richard Kato, he owns property at 314 S. Brookhurst. He has attended
several of the meetings staff has had on the project and they have done
an outstanding job. They recently had a break in and a vagrancy
problem. If there is a search for an incentive for a higher and better
use for vacant properties, it will produce places that have activity and
are well lit. Having owned two buildings on Brookhurst and being happy
to see Honeybaked Hams choose their street to construct a new building,
he is extremely encouraged that they can find a higher and better use
with very little impact to the residential area. He speaks in favor of
the project.
93-87
~nahe~m C~v~c Cen~er~ AN~ZM R~DEV~LOPMRNT
NOV~I4B~R 30~ 1993~ 5=00
Ross Davis, Mulliken Medical Center. He is not fully up to speed on the
redevelopment proposal. One question he would have, will existing
businesses in that area be left alone. Ne would like a response to that
concern. Also in that general area, in the past 6 to 8 months, there
has been a tremendous increase in vandalism and graffiti. It has gotten
bad in that area.
Lisa Stipkovich, Director of Community Development. Specifically
answering the question regarding whether they are going to work with
existing land owners, that is the intent - to assist them in becoming
more productive. In some cases, many properties that are vacant and not
utilized in any way they are trying to work with those property owners
to attract new uses to revitalize the site. They would like to do in
this area what they have done in the northeast industrial area where
there are 2400 acres in a redevelopment project and no acquisition or
eminent domain has been found to be necessary. They have worked with
the existing owners in the area and the existing businesses to assist
them in becoming more productive. They have provided infrastructure in
order to allow that development to occur. They have been able to
attract businesses to that area and that is the intent of the subject
project area as well.
Mayor/Chairman Daly. He asked if there are additional comments on the
proposed Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Redevelopment plans; there were
none.
Before closing the public hearing, Mayor Chairman Daly asked if there
were any questions of the Council/Agency, or Commission or any
additional staff comments. There being none, Mayor/Chairman Daly closed
the public hearing.
The following actions were then taken:
Agency Member Daly offered Resolution No. ARA93-26 for adoption, certifying
the Final Environmental Impact Report. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA93-26: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CERTIFYING THE COMPLETION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
BROOKHURST COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution No. ARA93-26 for adoption:
AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
The Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA93-26 duly passed and adopted.
Chairman McMillan offered Resolution Nos. CRC93-12 and CRC93-13 for adoption,
approving and adopting the redevelopment plan for the Brookhurst Commercial
Corridor Redevelopment project and recommending City Council approval. Refer
to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. CRC93-12: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION CONSIDERING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.
93-88
Anaheim Civic Centert ANAHEIM REDEVELOPN~NT AGENCY
NOVEMBER 30, 1993, 5~00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. CRC93-13: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BROOKHURST
COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. CRC93-12 and CRC93-1~ for adoptlon~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSION MEMBERS: Bostwick, Holguin, Linn, Perreira, Pinson,
Rennet, McMillan
COMMISSION MEMBERS: None
COMMISSION MEMBERS: None
The Chairman declared Resolution Nos. CRC93-12 and CRC93-13 duly passed and
adopted.
Agency Member Daly offered Resolution Nos. ARA93-27 through ARA93-29, both
inclusive, for adoption, the first approving and adopting Relocation
Assistance Guidelines for the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Redevelopment
Project, the second finding that the use of taxes allocated from the
Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Redevelopment Project for the purpose of
improving and increasing the Community's supply of iow and moderate income
housing outside the project area will be of benefit to the project and the
third approving and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Brookhurst
Commercial Corridor Redevelopment Project and recommending City Council
approval. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA93-27: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVING AND ADOPTING RELOCATION ASSISTANCE GUIDELINES FOR THE BROOKHURST
COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA93-28: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE BROOKHURST COMMERCIAL
CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPROVING AND INCREASING THE
COMMUNITY'S SUPPLY OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA
WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA93-29: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BROOKHURST COMMERCIAL
CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. ARA93-27 throuqh ARA93-29, both inclusive,
for adoption:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
AGENCY MEMBERS: None
AGENCY MEMBERS: None
The Chairman declared Resolution Nos. ARA93-27 through ARA93-29, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
Council Member Daly offered Resolution Nos. 93R-228 and 93R-229 for adoption,
first considering the Final Environmental Impact Report and the second finding
that the use of taxes allocated from the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor
Redevelopment Project for the purpose of improving and increasing the
Community's supply of Iow and moderate income housing outside the project area
will be of benefit to the project. Refer to Resolution Book.
93-89