Loading...
1967/01/179896 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - January 10~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. PM)POSED MEMORIAL WALT DISNEY: Mayor Kreim reported on recent meeting with Mr. David Baker, of the Orange County Board of Supervisors and three members of the D~sneyland Staff, to consider the suggestion of forming a Walt Disney Memorial Commission, advising that it was considered appropriate to appoint a fifteen member commission composed of Orange County residents to review some of the recon~ended memorY, als suggested by the public. The Mayor requested that members of the City Council submit names of persons recommended to serve on the Commission, and advised that Super- visor Baker was also soliciting suggested membership from the Board of S~pervisors. INTRODUCTION: Safety and Training Coordinator Thomas Tyre, of the Personnel D~partment, introduced seve~ new employees, attenting the Council Meeting as part of the ~!entatJon Program. On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Krein welcomed the new personnel to the City Family. ADJOURNMENT'~ Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded the raotion. MOTION CARRIED~ ADJOURNED: 2:00 P.M. City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES January 17~ 1967~ 1:30 PoMo The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein~ COUNCILMEN: None~ CITY MANAGER: Keith A~ Murdocho CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler~ CITY CLERK: Dene Mo Williams° CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddoxo DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G~ Orsborno ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelsono ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson~ ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Marvin Krieger~ CONVENTION CENTER AND STADIUM DIRECTOR: Thomas Liegler~ ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF: Jim Heyingo Mayor Krein called the meeting to order° PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were unanimously ratified by the City Council: ao Jaycee Week - January 15 to 22, 1967~ 1967 Recreational Vehicle Show ~ January 20 through 29, 1967. Four Chaplains Sunday February 5, 1967~ MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meetings of December 27, 1966, January 3 and 10, 1967, were approved on motion by Councilman Dutton seconded by Councilman Pebley. Councilman Dutton abstained from voting on the January lOth Minutes~ MOTION CARRIED~ WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° 9897 Ci~ Hall Anah_eim, California COUNCIL MINUTES -_januar 17 1967 1:30 PoM~ REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $555,520~69, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved~ PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NOo 18~6: Submitted by Walter J. and Gladys Cannon Furie requesting waivers of aggregate sign area, number and location of free-standing signs, and maximum permitted sign height; M-1 zoned property briefly described as located at 1354 South Anaheim Boulevard, Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Noo PC66~172. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Walter L, Brooks, of Excell.-Ad Electric Signs, and public hearing scheduled this date. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and noted findings of the Commission precedent to their denial of subject variance. Mayor Krein asked if the applicants or their representatives wished to address the City Council~ Mr- Walter L. Brooks, of Excell-Ad Electric Signs, Santa Ana, representing the petitioners, advised that the basis for their request was that National Automobile Manufacturers have commenced the program of sign standarization for their sales agencies across the nation, and in his opinion the proposed signs would improve the aesthetic appearance of subject property. That the requested 39 foot height would not. be detrimental to the residential area to the west, since there were other existing automobile dealer signs in the area which were equal or greater in height and sizes; that the lighting would be directed a~a¥ from the residential area~ He noted that the three requested signs w¢:uld be integrated into one free-standing sign~ Mr~ Br~oks further advised that the existing sign to be removed was larger in area than the proposed sign, and the flashing arrow signs were to be removed. He n~,ted Lbat the existing 1120 square foot back-drop sign on the property served to screen the service area on the east portion of the property, and witl~out the back-drop, the proposed sign area would be permitted, 'In conclusion, Mr, Brooks stated that they were willing to relocate the small entrance signs to a height of 8 feet above grade, He submitted photographs oi existing signs i~ the area for Council review (said photographs were returned to Mr. Br~oks)~ Mr- Warren Latimer, General Manager of McClure Lincoln Mercury, Authorized Agent, addressed the Council advising that the proposed sign had been designed on behalf of the Ford Motor Company by qualified professional designers, and specifically for their automobile agency, as had the existing back-drop sign, The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition. Mr. Harry Levin, representing Astrodata, Incorporated, 251 East Palais Road, advised that they recently made a considerable investment in sidewalk construction and landscaping to help upgrade the industrial area~ He stated they had not reviewed subject application, and requested a continuance of the hearing to allow them an opportunity to ~neet with the petitioners and determine how the request might affect their property~ The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council; there was no response~ On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, public hearing on Variance No~ 1846 was continued to January 31, 1967~ MOTION CARRIED° 9898 Cit___h~Hal__~l._A~na__heim~ (alifc;rn±a (t'~liN( [t M]N['.IES ]dnuar,~z 1967, 1:30 P~M PUBLIC HEARING - RESIDENT[AL - H[LLS]OE Lt~W DENSITY SINGLE-EAM[LY ZONE: Public hearing was scheduled tc cumsider City Planning Commission Resolution No, PC66-146 recommending ::n 4m~:,ndmc'~ ~ Fitle [8 ~,f the Anaheim Municipal (]ode by the addition at ¢:hapter 18 1 }: R-H, 10,000 Residentfal-Hillside Low Density Single-Family Zone Associate Planner Marvin ~r~eger briefed preliminary draft of the proposed Residential-Hillside Single-Family Zone, dated November 7, ]966~ Mayor Krein =sked i~ ~nv,me wished t,~ ~ddress the City Council in opposition to the pr,?posed g,)ne ['her~ was no response. Discussion was he]d by the City Council relative to proposed site devel~,pment standards (Secti,,n 18 13 030 ([3) (1), Minimum Lot Area), wherein 8,000 square feet w,~s pr, p~+sed 4s ~ minimum lnt ~re~, pr,wided that the averase size cf ~ll Ir,ts cre~ted ,,r subdivided within the same subdivision be 10,000 s,q~ar(, feet, ex~l,~siv~ of streets~ City Attorn(.v l~,seph (;eisler e×?ressed concern as te the proposed average ]~,t area ir; a s,~bcliv~si,m, be~n,S of the opini~n El]at the 8,000 square foot minimum sho,~lcl b~ 4ll~wed ~,~ly where a neighboring lot has an area of, passim[',..,, 12,000 sq,,are I-cat tie felt il]at there could be a problem of Code interor~.t,'~tit~n which w~,uld result in the maj,,r[ty of lots in ._lne hill and Mr (;cisJer c~[led ~ttcnti;'.n to the proposed minimum side yard seE- backs ,:i 5 feet (Se~t i,,n !8 iJ 0~0 i~ ) (2), Minimum Setbacks and Landscaping Requirements), n<~ti,~& th-~t trailers, campers, boats, etc., could not be lo- cated o~ the rear lx~rtt~>n :,f tl~u i, t if the dwelling were constructed to a point 5 feet from ~ re:]cud pr~pcrtv lxn~ It was l~is snggestion that one or both nf the sidev-~rd serl>acks bc rerl,~ired at a mi]imam of 8 feet. [)evelopn]ent S~r~ i,'.es i) r~c!~)r Alan {, (~rsborn advised that approxi- ~nately lO,O00 homes c~ ~](i b, ,.~,rstr[,~ted ~ the i~ill and canyon area, and alt. ho,~gh i~ recognized tile i,r:,biem ruiative i,, the storage ~f trailers, etc., he was ,,f ~he opini,~n LH.~t ~ w..~ti ,'.r e~_ed h,~me c,n a reasonable size lot was {itv N~:~n~:ger !,ei[!~ ', M~,rd, ct~ noted that Section 18 13 0~0 (G) (4) wo[~ld nro',.'Jde that wi,ere l~'Ls ~t~ se~r,~.~d by private ~ccessw..~'ys, no main structu[es shdll be i:.c-~ted mere tb~n '~00 feet from a standard fire hydrant He expressed concern as t~: the pr~,ctic ~]itv of such ~ requirement in the zone, since n~,rmalty b,,'clr.,uts &, n,-t exist ~t the time iction is being taken on a s,abdiv/si~n, or <,x~p ~t: Lhe t~me ,'f c~,nstruction Hr Kri~x,r' r,p r:,d [b-.~t it l~d been prcpesed tc make the fire i~vdrant~ a r~q~ixcmcut: 1::, b~ m~ t)ri~,r t~' tin~] acceptance of the subdivision, !t w:~s sus!;~st~d tl~-~E [, r' ~ l.~rific:~tion, an additi~m be made to SectJ~,~ [8 ) ~ 030 ~B), tl',~, i!~it[-~l substance l:c read-,s f~,]lows: "B. ~_/.2~m2~_~_j.C.~._.%k..l/!kr_kU!~.!!t~... N,, main structures sb-,ll be lc,cared more required, .~nd 9899 Cit__~a_l_l__a_A~n_a_h_eim_~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - Ja. n2ar_z_17 1967~_Po_M_z' Residential Hillside Zone Ordinance be referred to the City Attorney to incorporate wording in accordence with the. foregoing discussion~ Councilman Schutte seconded the motion M(~T[(~N CARRIED, PUBLIC HEARIN6 C-P~ COMMERCIAL HILLSIDE ZONE: Public hearing was scheduled to consider City Planning Commission Reselution No, PC66-146-A, recommending the adoption of an amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code by the addi,_ion of Chapter 18 39 C-H Commercial Hillside Zone. Councilman Chandler called attention to Section 18~39.020, Permitted Uses, the sixth line from the bottom of Page 1, being of the opinion that the word "shall" shot~ld be changed, as the intent could be interpreted to mean that nc, use, n,-r equipment would be objectionable for the reasons noted~ Mr~ 6eisler suggested that the wording be changed to read: "No use nor equipment utilized will be permitted if objectionable by reason of sight, noise, ~'dor, duse, smoke, vibrations or other causes." Councilman Chandler noted, under Paragraph A, Subsection 1 of the same Secti~;n, Primar'v uses, permitted retail business, that the time limitation of 6:30 A M tc~ Midnight for Subsection i, Off-sale beer, wine or liquor establishment, ~nd possibly for other type businesses, may be an a~'ea pre-e~pted by ~ine S'ate~ Mr. Geisler advised that the Alcoholic Beverage Control laws give the city the power of zoning, and no alcoholic beverage licenses are issued c~ntr~rv to the zoning. Attention was called to report dated January 12, 1967, prepared by the City Traffic Engineering Section, entitled "Service Station Access" (copies furnished each Councilman). Mr Krieger briefed the proposed Commercial Hillside Zoning Ordinance, calling attention to the Hill and Canyon General Plan posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, and noting the general area neighbor- hood shopping centers indic=ted in red on the plan, together with a regional shopping center depicted for the area of Tustin Avenue, and advised that these locations did net specifically designate commercial sites, but only general areas S14de pl~otographs were displayed illustrating typical plot plan of a neighborhood shopping center, and existing commercial building pad in the Nohl Ranch area together with necessary grading operations therefor, and four s~mple service station layouts. Additional phc-tographs were projected illustrating existing service stations and shopping facilities in the City of Redlands, where 25 foot landscaped setbacks are required, as contrasted to the proposed 10 feet for the Commercial Hillside Zone Mr. Krieger called attention to Page 3 of the proposed ordinance, Section 18~39 030 CB) (1) Street setback advising that the staff recommends an addition to the first sentence, te read as follows: "All pr~:;perti~s -~bott~ng a pt~blic street s, hall have a ten (10) foot open l~ndsc,~ped setback ~re~ extending for the full width of th~ property, except where driveways cr,~ss s4id areas." M~v,~r ~r~in -~sked if anyone wished to address the City Council concerning the prep,-sed ,,,rdrn~nce Mr, Carl l,,.~,e, representing Western Oil and Gas Association, 609 South Gr.~nd Avenue, I~s Angeles, .~dvised that most of the well known oil companies ~re membvrs ;,f the Associ.atien~ ~nd they have submitted to the City (lo,2nc~l letters .ql-;d pertinent ~nfo~'mation relative to the proposed ordinance. He briefed the comments snd recommendations, ~nd with reference to the trees required f~ r shopping centers, he n,;zted tb.~t no exception for serxzice st~.tions w~.s pr,l, vided w~thin the proposed ordinance, and in his opinion t~:e¥ w,2,~ld b~ required to provide trees under the ordinance as drafted. 9900 ~~_~nahei~ California · COUNCIL MINUTES J~nuary 1__~ _1~967 1:30 P~M~__~. Concerning external lighting proposed for parking areas, Mr. Lowe noted that if this provision applies to service stations, the 6 foot maximum height would not be sufficient for adequate lighting; that lights could be directed from a greater height, with provision for prohibition of any glare onto adjoining properties, Councilman Chandler expressed the opinion that the object of the proposed new zone was to establish a high quality residential area, and it was understandable that service stations would encounter some difficulty located in such an area; however, an attempt was being made to provide some services for the residents, without jeopardizing the integrity of the area~ Councilmen Dutton and Pebley concurred with Councilman Chandler's statement. Mr~ David Collins, 1077 West Ball Road, was of the opinion that 10 feet of landscaped setback could be a waste of valuable land; that land- scaped areas are not always beautiful, and often become an accumulating place for trash~ He felt that the required Development Services Review of landz scaped plot plans should be subject to appeal to the City Council, In conclusion, Mr Ccllins noted that the Riverside Freeway is scheduled to be constructed from a point near the junction of the existing freeway and the Newport Freeway, to a point several miles east, running north of the existing Santa Ans Canyon Road; and he foresaw the need for a major street to suit the area, it being his opinion that commercial facilities along said ma]or street should be exempt from ~he rig:Cd restrictions pro- posed in the Commercial Hillside ~one, as there will be a need for more commercial facilities than ~re projected at the present time. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council there being no response, declared the hearing closed. ' Mr~ Geisler was of the opinion that Development Services Department decisions on landscaped plot plans could be appealed~ ORDINANCE NOG 2348: Councilm~n Chandler offered Ordinance No~ 2348 for first reading, amending Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code by adding a new chapter to be numbered 18 ]9, ~=s recommended by the City Planning Commission, incorporating changes in wording on Pages 1 and 3 as noted in the foregoing discussion AN ORDLNANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHE!M AMENDING TI'ILE' 18 OF ?HE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAP?ER TO BE NL~BERED 18 39, Attention was called to the City Planning Commission Resolution. No~ PC66-146-A, which further recommended consideration of the adoption of a Hill and Canyon Commercial Roof policy, separate from the Commercial-Hill- side Zone ordinance; and Mr Geisler advised that the roof policy would be submitted at a later date in the form of a resolution for Council consideration~ RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved for ten minute recess, Councilman Dutton seconded the motion MOTION CARRIED. (3:~0 P.M,) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order, .all members of the City Council being present~ PUBLIC HEARING -PROPOSED AMENDMENT ~O TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE: Public hearing was scheduled to consider City Planning Commission Resolution No, PC66-147 recommending an amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18~04 General Provisions Section 18.04.020(6) Use, to include the R-H, 10,000, Residential Hillside Zone. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, public hearing on the foregoing recommendations was continued to January 2~, 1967, to be considered in conjunction with public hearing on ~n R-H, i0,000 Residential Hillside Zone MOIION CARRIED 9901 Cit Hall Anaheim California -COUNCIL MINUTES - Janua. r~7 1967 i:30___~P,M__.~ ENTERTAINMENT: PERMITS: The following applications for renewal of entertainment permits were submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to the provisions of Chapter 4,18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a~ Application submitted by Marcel Moynier to allow dancers and fashion shows at the Cascade Restaurant, 2125 South Harbor Boulevard. bo Application submitted by Peter and Edith Petropoulus to allow piano bar, entertainers and musical entertainment at the Pla-Mor Cocktail Lounge, 156 South Anaheim Boulevard. MOT l ON CARR I ED, FIREWORKS PERMIT -TACO BELL: Communication dated January 12, 1967, from Taco Bell Drive-In Restaurants requesting permission for a fireworks display at Taco Bell, 400 South Brookhurst Street, January 20 and 21, 1967, was sub- mitted together with report from the Chief of the Fire Department. On the recommendations of the Fire Chief, said fireworks permit was denied d~.~e tn the lack of space and the proximity of the property to residential properties, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Council- man Schutte. MOTION CARRIED, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-116 AND VARIANCE NO. 1793 -EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of Mrs. Patrici~ F. Jackson, dated December 21, 1966, was submitted for extension of time to Reclassification No 65-66-116 and Variance No. 1793 for compliance with certain conditions, pursuant to Resolutions Nos~ 66R-480 and 66R-481~ 180 day extension of time was granted by the City Council on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley~ MOTION CARRIED° SIGN RE~UESI - SOUTHLAND MACH!NERY COMPANY [PARLANCE NO, 1838~: Request of Southland Machinery ('ompany for temporary permit to locate a free.-standing sign within 15 feet of the northerly property line, was submitted together with report and recommendation of the Zoning Division; M-1 property located on the east side of Lewis Street, approximately 250 feet south of Katella Avenue, in the Southeast industrial area~ Zoning Supervisor Ron~ld Thompson noted the loc~tion of subject property and the existing uses ~nd zoning in the immediate area, He reported that the petitioner has ~greed to file a variance application for a waiver of the sign loc~tion, ~nd requests temporary permit to proceed with the installation of the sign ~t his own risk Mr. Thompson briefed the recommendations of the Development Service Department St~ff and reported that a communication dated ~anuary 17, 1967, from Westport Development, owners of property irmmediately adjacent on the north, had been s~bmitted advising they wo~ld have no objection to the proposed sign Mr Alfred (tiles, 1784 East Commonwealth, Fullerton, the Manager of the Southland Machinery Company, ~dvised that their grand opening was scheduled for February, ~nd six months time would be adequate for the temporary sign permJt~ On the recommendations of the Development Services Department, Councilman Dutton mr~ved that the temporary sign permit be granted for a period of six months, subject to the submission cf a variance petition for a waiver t,, allow the loc.~tion of the sign, installation of said sign to proceed at the applicants' own risk. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion, MOTION CARRIFD. ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIAN[E NO, 5839: Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held January 16, 1967, pertaining to Orange County Use Variance No, 5839 requesting permission for a television repair sh~p in ,~ r~tdenti~l s:tr.~trt;re, and the ~[~min4tion of the 9902 .~Anaheimz California COUNCIL MINUTES Januar 17 1967 1:30 P.M. required residential covered parking, property located on the east side of North Breokhurst Street approximately 112 feet south of the centerline of Catalina Street, was submitted recommending that the Orange County Planning Commission be urged to deny said use variance and setting forth their reasons therefor, On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City concurred with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission and ordered a copy thereof forwarded to the Orange County Planning Commission~ MOTION CARRiED~ ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE Nee 5840: Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held January 16, 1967, pertaining to Orange County Use Variance No. 5840, for permission to construct a single-family dwelling unit with attached garage replacing the existing residence on pro- perty located at 17386 La Paloma Avenue in the Atwood area, was submitted recommending that Orange County Use Variance No~ 5840 be received and filed due to the fact that uses and development in the area were residential, that the structures would not be adaptable for commercial-manufacturing purposes, and that the area would not be developed for industrial purposes for a number of years, Recommendations of the City Planning Commission were approved by the City Council, RESOLUTION NO. 67R-23 - PROJE£T NO. SS 493B: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No~ 67R-23 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM iFINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPR('VEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF WAGNER AVENUE AND STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, SS PROJECT NO. 493B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS~ PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTR!ICIION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC iMPROYEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WI1H SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETCo; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR .HE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF° (Bids to be opened February 9, 1967, 2:00 P,M,) Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: D~tton, Pebley, Sch~tte, Chandler and Krein COUNCIi. MEN: None LOUN( !LM[N: None The Mayor declared Res~:lution Nee 67R,-23 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION Nee 67R-2~ WORK ORDER Nee 426~297: Upton receipt of certification from the Director c,[ Public W~ rks, Councilman Dutt~'~n offered Resolution No~ 67R-2a for adopti,~,n Refer to Resc, l,~tien Bcck~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COlIN(ilL O[ THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL I&BOR, SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF ALL WEEDS AND RANK GROWTH UPON ALL LOTS AND AREAS WITHIN ~HE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER Nee 426-297 (E & G Engineers) Roll coil vote: AYES: COUNC [ [_MEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: Cc}UNC !'IMEN: Dutten, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein N,:?ne N;_;ne The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-24 duly passed and adopted. 9903 Cit Hall Anaheim, California .-COUNCIL MINUTES - January 17~ 1967_~_~L1:30 PoMo DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolutions Nos° 67R-25 to 67R-31, both inclusive, for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book~ RESOLUTION NOo 67R-25: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Lawrence A. Muckenthaler, et al) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-26: ~A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (Lawrence .A. Muckenthaler, et al) RESOLUTION NOo 67R-27: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Anaheim Union High School District) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-28: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (Orangethorpe Industrial Park) RESOLUTION NOo 67R-29: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY DRAINAGE PURPOSES, (Orangethorpe Industrial Park) RESOLUTION NOo 67R-30: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Savanna School District of Orange County) RESOLUTION NOo 67R-31: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES~ (Santa Fe Land Improvement Company) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCI LMt~N: ABSENT: COUN(: l LMEN: Dutton, Pebley~ Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos: 67R-2.5 to 67R-31, both inclusive, duly passed s. nd adopted~ PURCHASE OF E__O~UIiPMENT: %'be City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of 50 7200 Volt 100 RVAR Capacitors, as follows, noting that the General Electric Company had submitted an alternate bid for a new improved quality capacitor at a greater cost, however the improvement would result in recovery of the difference in price: Westinghouse Electric Corpo, Los Angeles General Electric Coo, Los Angeles Bid 50-Magnavar Alternate Line Material Company, Los Angeles Sangamo Electric Company, Los Angeles $7,540~00 7,540~00 8,840.00 7,540°00 7,540~00 On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that the alternate bid of General Electric Company, in the amount of $8,8~0 including tax, be accepted and purchase authorized as the lowest and best qualified bid~ Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° PURCHASE: The City Manager reported on informal quotations received for the purchase of 1 Aerial Device for the Parkway Maintenance Division, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of Casey-Metcalf Machinery 9904 City Hall~ Anaheim, California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - January 17~ 1967~ 1:30 P~Mo Company: Casey-Metcalf Machinery Company, Delaware, Ohio $10,644.40 Pitman Manufacturing Company, Industry, California 12,724.40 On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that the low bid of Casey-Metcalf Machinery Company be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $10,644.40 including tax. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NOo 67R-32: On report and recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-32 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMPROMISE OF CERTAIN EMINENT DOMAIN LITIGATION, and DIRECTING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE CERTAIN PAYMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. (Carl 3. Bleck, et al - Fire Station No. 4) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: CO6~CiLMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 67R-32 duly passed and adopted. ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT - EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton moved that the City Manager be authorized to execute Escrow Instructions in connection with exchange of property between the Orange County Water District and the City of Anaheim (La Palma Avenue extension east of Jefferson Street). Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by .John F. Daly for damages purportedly resulting from excessively high voltage near his home prior to the Fall of 1966, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the Insurance Agent, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO~ 67R-33: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No~ 67R-33 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS TO EXECUTE DOCh~ENTS IN CONNECTION WITH FEDERAL CIVIL DEFENSE PROGRAMS~ (City Manager and Coordinator of Disaster Services) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 67R-33 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-34: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 67R-34 for adoption, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC ROAD CONNECTIONS ON THE MASTER PLAN OF ROADS AND STREETS FOR THE SANTA ANA CANYON AREA° (Access points, Exhibit No~ 7- Resolution No~ 66R-27 adopted January 11, 1966) Roll call vote: 9905 ~A~n~ California ,t COUNCIL MINUTES - Januar'y 17 1967 1:30 PoM= AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 67R-34 duly passed and adopted° CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton: Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application NoD 47365 for Tanner Motor Tours, LTD. regarding transportation of persons in sight- seeing service in and around the City of Los Angeles; and Application No, 47382 for Southern California Sightseeing Company, llnc. to establish fares and to issue securities and application of Greyhound Lines, Inc. to acquire control of Southern California Sightseeing Company, Inco Before the Public Utilities Commission - Case Nco 8244 - Investigation for the purpose of establishing a list for the year 1966 of railroad grade crossings of city streets or county roads most urgently in need of separation, or existing separations in need of alteration or re- construction as contemplated by Section 189 of the Streets and Highway Code. Summary cf Apportionments of Motor Vehicle License Fees for the period of June 1, 1966 through November 30, 1966. Minutes Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Meeting of December ]5, 1966. e Annual report ef the Building Division for 1966. fo Financial & Operating Reports for the Month of December, 1966~ MOTION CARRIED ORDINANCE NOo 2344: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No° 2344 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Bcok~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF' ANAHEIM AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2307 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 63-64-103. (Deleting Parcel B) Roll call veto: AYES: COUN( 1 LMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENI: CO!;NC ILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, C!handler and Krein None None Maycr Krein declared Ordinance No~ 2344 duly passed and adopted, ORDINANCE NOD 2345: (cuncilman Dutton offered Ordinance No~ 2345 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Beck AN ORDiNaNCE OF THE CITY OF ANAH~tM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING (66-67-33 ~ C.-1) Roll call vote: AYES: ( OI:NC ! LMEN: NOES: CO UNf !LMEN: ABS ENI:: CO UNf [IMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mavor Krein declared Ordinance No, 2345 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2346: (cuncilman Pebley offered Ordinance Nco 2346 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book 9906 Ci_~_x_Hal_~j_~i _Anaheim, California .- C~UNCIL MINUTES Jan~7 1967 1:30 PoMe AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELAI'INC TO ZONING° (66-67-34 - C-I) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayer Krein declared Ordinance Ne~ 2346 duly passed and adoptedo ORDINANCE NO° 2347: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance Nee 2347 for adoption. Refer te Ordinance Bocko AN ORDINAN(E OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A_MENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELA?ING TO ZONING~ (66-67-37 Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: CO lrN¢ ILMEN: ABSENT: t O[!'NCi I MEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None Mayer Krein declared Ordinance No, 2347 duly passed and adopted~ ORDINANCE Nee 2349: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No~. 2349 for first reading, AN ORDINAN6E OF IHE CiTY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING I!ITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL £ODE REI~TING I'O ZON£N¢-r. (66~-67-36 M~i) ORDINANCE ~iO~ 2350: C,:.oncilman Pebley offered Ordinance No~ 2~50 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING 7ITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM ML~]CIP~L CODE R~iATING %O ZONING~ (65-66-104 - C-l) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLiCA?iON: Application submitted by Takeo Matsunaga and Yasumi Miyamoto for New On Sale Beer and Wine license (Bona Fide Eating Place) for Midori, 923 South Beach Boulevard (C-1 zone, Conditional Use Permit No. 907), w=s presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. No Council action was taken on the foregoing application. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPL[CAI!ON: Application submitted by Louis S. and Allene Albano for New On Sale Beer and Wine license at Albano's Bit of Italy, 1935 East Lincoln Avenue (£-1 zone), was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application on the basis that the C-1 zone does not permit on-sale sale of alcoholic beverages~ MOTION CARRIED° RESOLUTION NO. 67R-35: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Reso]ution No 67R-35 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN OPTION TO LEASE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH ANAHEIM 7RANSPORTATION CENTER liN CONNECTION THERE- WITH, (Airport Coach Service) 9907 ~naheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES January 17~ 1967~ 1:30 PoM~ Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos 67R-35 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-36: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 67R-36 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WITH REFERENCE TO IMPROVEMENT OF LA PALMA AVENUE AND DEDICATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE PURPOSES. (La Palma Avenue extension east of Jefferson Street) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-36 duly passed and adopted. SURVEY -AMBULANCE RATES: The City Council determined that consideration of ambulance service rates be deferred to January 31, 1967, for review of report submitted to Council this date. PROPOSED AGREEMENT - MADISON S_~UARE GARDEN CORPORATION AND CITY OF ANAHEIM: The City Manager briefly reviewed the proposed agreement between Madison Square Garden Corporation and the City of Anaheim for use of Anaheim Con- vention Center facilities, and called attention to obvious errors in dates, recommending that the following changes be made: Page 1, Line 22 Term of Agreement: Change "second" to "first" Monday in September, 1987~ Page 19, Line 9 Opening Day of/ Convention Center: Change "June" to "August" 15, 1967. Councilman Chandler left the Council Table, and requested the record to show that he did not participate in the discussion, nor vote on this issue~ (4:20 P~M,) Mr Murdoch further suggested that on Page 4, commencing at Line 4, where events not in direct competition with events to be presented by the exhibitor are outlined, specific reference should be made to include public dances, which may be of a community nature. Mr- Danny Dare, 235 West Orangewood Avenue, addressed the City Council advising that he had read the proposed agreement, and requested that action be deferred to allow him an opportunity to meet with the City Manager and City Attorney to present suggestions and comments. Mr. Geisler noted that although the agreement was not in final 9908 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 17~ 1967~ 1:30 P.Mo form, the City Council, by motion, could approve the concept, subject to minor changes in wording, and to the addition of the essential exhibits; that other specific areas which may come up as result of the suggested meeting with Mr. Dare could be worked out and presented for further consideration. Mr. Tommy Walker, 722 Westwood Place, advised that he had briefly reviewed the proposed agreement, and in the mutual interest of the pending decision, he would welcome an opportunity to discuss the proposal. He was particularly concerned as to how the term "non-competitive events" would be defined~ The City Manager was of the opinion that the City should take advantage of Mr. Dare's and Mr. Walker's knowledge and experience in the field of staging various types of events. He noted that the Council could approve the concept, and the wording content of the agreement could be worked out and included in the final documents. Mr. Dare advised that he spoke only for himself, and he could see no reason why the City should not enter into an agreement with Madison Square Garden Corporation; however, he felt that the final decision should be postponed, pending the requested meeting. Mr. Murdoch suggested that the requested meeting be held during this evening's session of the City Council; and the matter continued to the evening session. Mayor Krein advised that he would not be present at the 7:00 P.M. session, however he could be reached by telephone, if necessary. Councilman Dutton moved that the proposed agreement between the City of Anaheim and Madison Square Garden Corporation be approved in concept. Mayor Krein was of the opinion that the approval of the concept should be withheld until after the meeting of City representatives with Mr. Dare and Mr. Walker. The foregoing motion was lost for the lack of a second. At the conclusion of the discussion, Council decision on the proposed agreement with Madison Square Garden Corporation was continued to the 7:00 P.M. session of the Council Meeting, to allow a meeting of the City Manager, City Attorney, and the Convention Center and Stadium Director with Mr. Dare and Mr. Walker. (See Page No. 9918) Councilman Chandler returned to the Council Table, 4:35 P.M. APPOINTMENT - ANAHEIM HALLOWEEN FESTIVAL BOARD OF GOVERNORS: The City Manager reported on communication received from Mr. Marvin F. Essenmacher, President Anaheim Halloween Festival, announcing that the Festival is now a separate division of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, that the organization and the establishment of policy for the festival will be vested in a Board of Governors consisting of eight regular members representing the Chamber of Commerce, the School District and City Government, and three exofficio members, that they request a representative from the City Government to serve as regular member of the Board. Mayor Krein appointed Councilman Calvin L. Pebley as member 9909 ~ity Hall_~__Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 17~ 1967, 1:~0 P.M. of the Anaheim Halloween Festival Board of Governors. Said appointment was unan~nous]y ~atified by the City Council~ LITIGATION CITY OF ANAHEIM VERSUS FLACK~ ET AL: The City Attorney reported on lhe results of litigation between the City of Anaheim and Flack, et al, and recommended that the offer of John Gallagher to prepare necessary first brief on appeal, in the event of an appeal, for the equivalent of one week's salary, be accepted. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, offer of John Gallagher to prepare first brief, if appealed, was authorized~ MOTION CARRIED~ RESOLUTION NO. 67R-37: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-37 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT AMENDING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO ON OCTOBER 16, 1962 BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE SANTA ANA STREET WATER COMPANY; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 66R-359. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 67R-'37 duly passed and adopted~; RESOLUTION NO~ 67R-38: On the reconm~endations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No~ 67R-38 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES, (Seccion 2107 South Harbor Boulevard) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R.-38 duly passed and adopted~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 878: Councilman Dutton called attention to conditions under which Conditional Use Permit No. 878 was granted by the City Council October 4, 1966, to allow establishment of a motorcycle sales and service agency on property located at the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Stonybrook Drive (720 South Beach Boulevard), advising that he had again been receiving complaints from the residential area to the south, relative to the noise, dust and dirt caused by the motorcyles. He requested that the City Attorney investigate the situation and report to the City Council. PERMISSION TO LEAVE THE STATE: Councilman Dutton was granted permission to 9910 Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 17~ 1967~ 1:30 PoM_______~o leave the State for approximately three weeks, commencing February 2, 1967. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED~ ANAHEIM CONVENTION CENTER AND STADIL~ FACILITIES: Reference was made by Council- man Dutton and Mr. Murdoch to recent articles appearing in the Anaheim Bulletin with reference to the Convention Facility and the Anaheim Stadium. It was reported that the arena of the Convention Center was purposely designed to exclude professional basketball and hockey games~ further, in negotiating with Golden West Baseball Company, Incorporated, the provision regulating television proceeds was thoroughly explored, and the contract written accordingly. RECE__SS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P~M~ seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. (4:45 PoMe) Councilman Schutte AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pro Tem Pebley called the meeting to order. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutten, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. COUNCILMEN: Krein, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis~ ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson. CITY CLERK: Dene M~ Williams DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G~ Orsbern~ ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson~ CITY ENGINEER: James P~ Maddox~ ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson~ ASSISTANT PLANNER: Charles Roberts~ INVOCATION: Rabbi Aaron Tofie]d, of Temple Beth Emet, gave the Invocation~ FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Dutton let the Assembly in the Plege of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 66-67-42 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Nee 905: Submitted by Earl Spratlen and Hector Pelayo requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-l, and permission to establish a service station at the intersec- tion of a secondary street and a local street within 75 feet of a residential zone, with waiver of maximum building height; property briefly described as located at the northeast corner of East Street and Kenwood Avenue (1302 and 1308 North East Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolutions Nos~ PC66-173 and PC66-i74 recommended denial of said reclassification and denied said conditional use permit. Communication dated January 17th, 1967, from William A. Topliker, Authorized Agent, was submitted requesting continuance of said public hearing to January 24, 1967, due to the illness of one of the property owners. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, public hearing on Reclassification No. 66-67-42 and Conditional Use Permit No. 905 was continued to January 31, 1967, 7:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIEDo PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66-67-143 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO~ 906: Submitted by William H. Grebel and Voge, Incorporated, requesting a change of zone from C-1 to delete deed restrictions which limit the use of the property and to permit full range of C-1 Uses. Further, requesting per- mission to establish a service station at the intersection of a collector street and a primary street within 75 feet of a residential zone with waiver of required six foot masonry wall of Parcel l; property briefly described as located at the southwest corner of South Street and State College Boulevard~ 9911 C_~Ana___~hei__m~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolutions Nos~ PC66-177 and PC66-178 recommended denial of said reclassification and denied said conditional use permit~ Communication dated January 9, 1967, from Mr. O. W. Louderback of Standard Oil Company of California, Authorized Agent, was submitted requesting that subject public hearing be continued to allow one of the property owners to be present~ On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, public hearing on Reclassification No~ 66-67-143 and Conditional Use Permit No, 906 was continued to January 31, 1967, 7:00 PoM~ MOTION CARRIED° PUBLIC HEARING VARIANCE NOo 1637: Request of Mr. Marvin Liles, owner of M and M Market, 500 South Citron Street, for approval of revised remodeling plans~ was considered by the City Council at their meeting held December 27, 1966, at which time said matter was scheduled for public hearing before the City Council and supplemental reports requested from the Planning Commission and Zoning Division of the Development Services Department. Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held January 16, 1967, was read by the City Clerk reporting that the Commission advised the City Council the land use in the area of subject property has not changed to warrant amendment to the previous action taken on subject variance, that the proposed expansion to the south into the single family residential structure would establish an undesirable precedent for conversion of other dwellings, and would have deleterious effect on the residential integrity of the area~ Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council together with reports from the Development Services Department and Building Division~ Mr~ Marvin Liles requested that the recommendation of the City Planning Commission be overruled, due to the fact that the store has been in existance since 1921 and is located adjacent to the railroad track and on the only truck route through Anaheim~ He further advised that the outside appearance of the residence had not been changed, Mr~ Liles thereupon submitted photographs of the immediate neighborhood surrounding subject property. The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council. Mr. D. F. Lehmer, 510 South Citron Street, read his communication dated January ~, 1967, signed by four other residents in the 500 block on South Citron Street, requesting that the variance be denied, and setting forth their reasons therefor, Mr~ A. Fo Habener, 600 Grove Avenue, advised that although he did not reside in the immediate area, he and many other customers travel out of their way to patronize the market with its friendly atmosphere, that there is still a need for the corner grocery store as a convenience to neighborhood residents. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question whether the expansion would be for storage, Mro Liles advised that the additional space re- quested would be used for merchandising. Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. At the request of Councilman Schutte, approximately five persons in the Council Chamber raised their hands in opposition to the expansion of the market, and a large number of persons indicated their approval of said request. 9912 Cit Hall Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January_ lZ, 1967, 1:30 P.Mo Councilman Chandler referred to petition in favor of the expansion of the market, previously submitted and on file with subject variance, advising that approximately 27 persons residing on Citron Street from the 400 block to the 600 block, had signed in approval of the expansion as re- quested on the original plan. Mr. Austin Mougey, 509 South Citron Street, addressed the Council in opposition and advised that it was his understanding that only those persons within a 300 foot radius of subject property would be notified of this public hearing, and he failed to see how anyone residing a greater distance away could be affected. Mr. Mougey called attention to the construction problems of the applicant, and was of the opinion that the building permit obtained allowed construction of a patio roof only Mr~ Mougey advised that he would not object to an improvement, but did object to the small additions made from time to time. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Pebley's question, Mr. Liles advised that the market and dwelling were both on one lot. Mro Orsborn reported that a building permit was issued covering the breeze-way only, and not for remodeling the residence. RESOLUTION NO~ 67R-~9: At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No~ 67R-39 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 64R-551, Condition No~ 2, Variance No~ 1637, by approving expansion to the south, subject to the following conditions: That the structure be brought up to code requirements. Subject to obtaining a building permit, and that the plans be filed consistant with the code, which would permit inspection according to code requirements. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64R-551 IN VARIANCE NO~ 1637. (Condition Noo 2) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUN£II~EN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pre Tem declared Resolution No~ 67R-39 duly passed and adopted. Regarding the "stop order" on the property, the City Council determined that the stop order would remain in effect until required plans are received and approved by the Building Division and building permit is issued~ Mr. Orsborn reported that the construction work already completed, has precluded some framing and electrical inspection, and it should be understood that it was possible that inspection might require removal of some paneling and possible re-installation of beams and studs in order to meet code requirements- 9913 City Hall~ Anaheim~ Califg.,rnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 1~.~ 1967, 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-22 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89 (TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 6311 AND 6314): RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-22: Submitted by Reichert & Son requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3 on Parcel No~ 1, and from R-A to C-1 on Parcel No~ 2; Parcel No~ 1 located on the east side of Lewis Street, north of the centerline of Chapman Avenue, and Parcel No. 2 located on the west side of Manchester Avenue, north of the Anaheim City Limits as measured along Manchester Avenue, and adjacent on the east to Parcel No~ 1~ The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-179 recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 35 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Lewis Street, for street widening purposes~ That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lewis Street and Manchester Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer} and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Lewis Street and Manchester Avenue, for street lighting purposes. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Lewis Street and Manchester Avenue, for tree planting purposes~ 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the F~re Department. o That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and re- creation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. o That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. o That any air-conditioning facilities proposed for the commercial portion, shall be properly shielded from view and all sound buffered from ad- jacent residential development. 10. That Condition Nos~ 5, 6, and 9, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89: City Planning Commission Resolution No~ 9914 ~i. ty Hall~ Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - January 17~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M~ PC66-180 was submitted recommending consideration of an amendment to the General Plan affecting uses of land, bounded on the north by Orange- wood Avenue, on the east by Manchester Avenue and the Santa Ana Freeway, on the west by Lewis Street, and on the south by the Anaheim City Boundary. Assistant Planner Charles Roberts briefly presented General Plan Amendment No~ 89, initiated as result of the application for change of zone on Parcels 1 and 2, noting that the General Plan presently depicts low density residential land uses for much of the area, with medium density land uses indicated for the northwestern section of the area around the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Lewis Street, and a neighborhood shopping center symbol at the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Lewis Street~ He noted the existing land uses in the study area, vising that the uses immediately surrounding the area are primarily low density residential in nature~ Reference was made to the brochures of "The City" (copies furnished each Councilman), a planned metropolitan development including retail and commercial office facilities, and high-rise apartment buildings, to be located generally between Chapman Avenue and the Garden Grove Freeway, and Manchester Avenue and Lewis Street. Mr. Roberts reported that the commercial influence of the development could possibly extend northerly, having a substantial effect upon the development of the area under con- sideration~ Attention was called to Alternative Exhibits "A" and "B", posted on the west wall of the Council Chamber, Exhibit "A" proposing commercial uses extending northerly of Chapman Avenue, and including front- ages on Chapman and Manchester Avenues, with medium density residential for the remainder of the study area; Exhibit "B" depicting medium density residential for that portion of the study area within the City of Anaheim, and not proposing changes in the areas outside the City of Anaheim. The recommended approval of Exhibit "A" by the City Planning Commission indicated their approval of commercial expansion north of Chapman Avenue° Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of subject reclassification, as being consistent with their recommendation on General Plan Amendment No~ 89, which would allow development of subject property to its highest and best use. Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council A representative of the petitioners indicated his presence for the purpose of answering any questions of the Council~ The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed~ RESOLUTION NOo 67R-40: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No~ 67R-40 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to R-3 and C-l, as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (66-67-22 R-3 and C-i) Roll call vote: 9915 ~~ahei~z_Ca_li_j~ornia COUN¢IL MINUTES ~- Jan~1967~ 11:.30 PoM~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCIiLMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No, 67R-40 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO~ 67R-41: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 67R-41 for adoption, approving General Plan Amendment Non 89, Exhibit "A". Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 89~ (E×hibit ~'A") Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No, 67R-41 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAPS~RACTS NOS~ 6311 AND 6314: Developer, Reichert & Son tracts located southerly of Orangewood Avenue, between Lewis Street and the Santa Aha Freeway, and proposed for subdivision into 57 R.-2, 5,000 lots each, with a a acre commercial site fronting on Manchester Avenue~ Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held December 19, 1966, was submitted being noted that at the request of the developer, the City Planning Commission terminated all proceedings on Tentative Tracts Nos~ 6311 and 631h, on the basis that a change in development plans required termination of subject tracts~ No further action was taken by the City' Council on Tentative Tracts Nos, 6311 ~nd 6314, PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66-67.-.hl AND VARIANCE NOo 1845: Submitted by Edwin Frahm and Henry Wesseln requesting change of zone from R-A to C-2, and permission for heavy equipment rentals; property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue west of Euclid Street (1717 and 1721 West Lincoln Avenue), The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No, PC66-166 recommended approval of said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1, That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lincoln Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 2, That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2 O0 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue, for street lighting purposes~ That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15c per front foot along Lincoln Avenue, for tree planting purposes~ 4 That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 57 That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view. That Condition Nos, 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 9916 Cit Hall An ha eim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Januar 17 1967 1:30 PoM~ 7. That Condition Nos 4 and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections~ That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Variance No. 1845, The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No~ PC66-167 granting said variance subject to the following conditions: That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifica- tion No~ 66.-67~41~ That a time limitation of two years shall be granted for use of subject property, and upon request of the petitioner, an additional time extension may be granted, if approved by the Planning Commission or City Council° That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos~ 1 and 2, provided, however, that the site development standards of the C-1 Zone pertaining to parking and landscaping shall be complied witb~ Mro Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, advising that plans subz mitted indicate use of existing residential structures for real estate and equipment rental offices He called attention to Condition No~ 2 of the Planning Commission's resolution granting subject variance for a period of two years~ In answer to Council questioning, Mr~ Thompson reported it was his understanding that the equipment to be rented was small, and would be located to the rear of the structures, with off.-street parking in front of the offices~ The Mayor Pro Tem asked if the applicant had any additional evidence to present, the response being negative, asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed~ RESOLUTION NOo 67R-42: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No~ 67R-42 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ Refer to Resolution Book A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED~ (66-67-41 C-2) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No: 67R-42 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 67R-43: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-43 for adoption, granting Variance No 18a5, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolt~tion Book A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO, 1845~ Roll call vote: 9917 CitHall Anah~l_j_i~orni~ - COU__NCI.L MINUTES January 17, 1967, 1:30 AYES: COUNC I LMEN: NOES: CO UN£I LMEN: ABSENT: £OUNC I LMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No~ 6'7R.-43 duly passed and adopted PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 66~67~44 AND VARIANCE NOo 1847: Submitted by Eugene O. and Mary O. Holabird requesting change of zone from R-A to C-1 and permission for automobile parking on the front setback of a re- sidential structure with waiver of required six foot masonry wall, in order to establish use of existing residential building as a general morgage loan, real estate and insurance office; property briefly described as located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue west of Dale Street (2840 West Lincoln Avenue). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No, iPC66-175 recommending approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions 1, That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Lincoln Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and speci- fications on file in the office of the City Engineer; or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 2 That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 3, That the owners cf subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15c per front foot along Lincoln Avenue, for tree planting purposes h. That Condition Nos~ 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. Pursuant to Resolution No, PC66~176, the City Planning Commission granted said variance, subject to the following conditions: 1, That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifi- cation No 66-67-44~ 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No 1, provided, however, that all site development standards of the C-1 zone shall be complied with~ Mr~ Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing land uses and zoning in the immediate area, advising that the dwelling is located more than 70 feet from the front property line, and the north half of the property would be utilized for commercial purposes- He noted that the properties in this area are extremely deep with the southerly portions thereof being mostly land-locked parcels, Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if one of the petitioners or their representative wished to address the City Council~ Mr. Kenneth Sarvak, 9802 Messersmith Street, advised that he was the proposed owner of subject property, and intended to comply with all conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission. The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. 9918 Cit Hall .Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Sanuar 17 1967 1:30 PoMe RESOLUTION NOs 67R-44: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 67R-44 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the name as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED~ (66-67-44 ~ C-l) Roll call vote~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein %'he Mayor Pro Tem declared Reso]ution No, 67R-44 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 67R-45: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No~ 67R-45 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1847 subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, Refer to Resolution Book~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution Noo 67R-45 duly passed and adopted~ RECESS: Councilman Schutte moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED° (8:00 P'~M.o) AFTER RECESS: Mayer Pro Tem Peble'v called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present with the exception of Councilman Krein, PROPOSED AGREEMENT - MADISON SQUARE GARDEN CORPORATION (Continued from the. 1:30 PoM, Meetin~_~_a_g~ No. 91~07~i Due to the fact that the meeting between the City Manager, City Attorney, Convention Center and Stadium Director, and other interested parties bad not yet been concluded, it was determined that further Council censideration of the proposed agreement between the City of Anaheim and Madison Square Garden Corporation be de~erred to January 18, 1967, ]0:00 A~M, ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn to January 18, 1967, 10:00 A~Mo, and also moved w~iver of further notice of said adjournment~ Councilman Schutte seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED° ADJOURNED: 8:25 PoMe SIGNED: