Loading...
1967/03/14 (2)10018 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14~ 1967, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebleyo COUNCILMEN: Krein. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert A. Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddox. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas Ogden. PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Roy Heissnero Mayor Pro Tem Pebley called the meeting to order. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meetings held February 14 and 21, 1967 were approved on ~otion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte. Councilman Dutton abstained from voting on approval of February 14th Minutes, due to his absence from said meeting. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Chandler moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading Of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $1,454,372.50, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved. INTRODUCTION: Personnel Safety and Training Coordinator Thomas Tyre introduced a group of new employees attending the Council Meeting as part of their orienta- tion program. AWARD - ~2~300,000. BONDS - BANK OF AMERICA N.T. & S.A. AND ASSOCIATES: Finance Director Douglas K. Ogden reported on computations of bids received for the $2,300,000 bonds of the City of Anaheim designated Municipal Improvement Bonds, Election 1963, Series B, and verified that quotations received were mathematically correct and that the bid of Bank of America N.T. & S.A. and Associates is the bid yielding the lowest net interest costs. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-131: After considering the various bids and the report thereon, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 67R-131 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING $2,300,000 BONDS OF SAID CITY TO THE BEST BIDDER AND REJECTING ALL OTHER BIDS. On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 67R-131 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 6170 EXTENSION OF TIME: Request of C. E. Bever, dated February 24, 1967, was submitted for one year extension of time to Tentative Map, Tract No. 6170 for completion of conditions and filing of final tract map; R-E zoned property located west of Peralta Hills Drive, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road (Reclassification No. 64-65-110). On the recommendations of the City Engineer and the Development Services Department, one year extension of time was granted by the City Council 10019 City Hall~ Anaheim: California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14~ 1967: 1:30 P.M. on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. TRAILER REQUEST CENTRAL ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: The City Council, at their meeting held March 7, 1967, denied request of the Central Assembly of God Church to use 7 by 12 foot house trailer for temporary Sunday School classroom~ pending construction of additional educational unit; property located at 1026 South East Street. The City Clerk read communication dated March 9, 1967, from Pastor Ernest L. Friend, requesting reconsideration of the foregoing request. Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was noted that the request to use a trailer was denied on the recommendations of the Development Services Department, due to the inadequate size of the trailer for the proposed use, and the lack of two exits, as required by the Building Code. At the conclusion of the discussion, the Assistant Development Services Director was instructed to contact Pastor Friend and explain the reasons for denial, and to advise that if the trailer met safety requirements, a new request would be considered. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS NOS. 745 AND 858 - REVISED PLANS: Mr. Mickelson reported on property at 1840 South Harbor Boulevard, advising that Conditional Use Permit No. 745 was approved for a Royal Viking Restaurant and shops in con- junction with a wax museum; that approval of on-sale liquor in said restaurant was granted under Conditional Use Permit No. 858; subsequently, revised plans were approved January 10, 1967, involving a 10 foot expansion to the west. A second revision to plans approved January 10, 1967 is now sub- mitted to provide a further 7 foot encroachment into the front setback area (total of 17 feet) to provide for a cocktail lounge in conjunction with a Mannings Restaurant. Mr. Mickelson noted Ordinance No. 2364 establishing a 50 foot setback along Harbor Boulevard will be effective April 6, 1967. Revised plans were brought forward to the Council Table for review and discussion was held. Mr. Jack Walter, 5782 Mountainview, Yorba Linda, representing the applicants, advised that the proposed business would be a family-style restaurant, the expansion of the building is to allow the cocktail lounge to be separated from the dining area. He submitted a floor plan of the cocktail lounge, and reported that although the wax museum to the south has a 50 foot building setback, the colonnades and vaults extend 19 feet into the 50 foot front building setback. Mr. Walter noted that the existing paved parking area in front of the building will be removed and the area will be landscaped. He advised that the building would be leased on a long term basis. Further discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that if the City Council determined that the requested 33 foot setback should be approved, then a change to the 50 foot setback policy along Harbor Boulevard should be made. In answer to Council questioning Mr. Mickelson reported that build- ing setbacks on the east side of Harbor Boulevard north of Katella Avenue are nearly all 50 feet, with the exception of the restaurant at the northeast corner of the intersection, which has been established for some time. Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that a 35 foot landscaped setback would present a better appeaYan~e than ~he 50 feet, with up to 35 feet thereof used for p~rking of vehicles. It was suggested by thm City Attorney that an alternate provision bm includmd in Ordinancm No. 2364 for specie! setbacks iN the commercial re- crmation area, 50 feet with a minimum of 15 feet of landscaping, or 35 feet if fully landscaped, it being noted that the Development Smrvices Department has indicated that staggered setbacks are more attractive than those which are uniform. 10020 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. At the conclusion of the discussion, action on subject request was deferred one week (March 21, 1967)2 to allow visual inspection of subject property and the surrounding area in order to determine whether the pending 50 foot front setback is realistic, and whether the ordinance should be amended to allow a lesser setback with full landscaping and no parking. Plot plan submitted by Mr. Walter was retained for the file. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 67R-132: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 67R-132 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON THAT PORTION OF A RIGHT OF WAY FOR PIPE LINE PURPOSES FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF WATER UPON, ALONG, OVER, UNDER, ACROSS, AND THROUGH THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing April 4, 1967, 1:30 P.M.; Irrigation pipe line north of La Palma Avenue between Dowling and Linda Vista) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 67R-132 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - CALL FOR BIDS: Councilman Dutton offered Resolutions Nos. 67R-133 and 67R-134 for adoption, Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-133 - PROJECT NO. 504-B: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLER STREET AND MIRALOMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 504-B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened April 6, 1967, 2:00 P.M.) RESOLUTION NO. 07~{-134 PROJECT NO. 491B: A RESOLUTION OF 'i~HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND >~ECESS[TY REQI~IRE '['HE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETI. ON OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO Wi'g: '['HE I)O~'q~ING STREEI, ~ROWTHER AVENUE AND A.T. & S.F.R.R. CROSSING STREET IMPROVEMENT, I~q THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, SS PROJECT NO. 491B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWf?~GS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZIh'G FHE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE :~flTH SAiD PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY (]LERK 70 PUBLISH A NOTICE INV1T[NC SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION T}iEREOF. (Bids to be opened April 6, 1967, 2:00 P.M.) Roll call vote: AYES: EQUNCIL}~N: NOGS: COUNCILMEN: A~E~T: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebl. ey None Krein The Mayo[ Pro Tem declared Re§o~utfon~ No§. 67~-133 and 67R-134, du~y pa~e~ ~n~ a~optad. 10021 City Hall? Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14~ 19677 1~30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-135 - PROJECT NO. SS 481B: On receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution NOo 67R-135 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BALL ROAD AND NUTWOOD STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. SS 481B. (Smith Electric Supply Company) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution Noo 67R-135 duly passed and adopted. DEED OF EASEMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 67R-136: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No° 67R-136 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY oF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Herbert and Lela Neff) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 67R-136 duly passed and adopted. LA PALMA AVENUE EXTENSION RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION, PRIMUS HOLDING COMPANY: The City Manager reported on an offer by the Primus Holding Company to dedicate sufficient property for the ultimate full right-of-way along the La Palma Avenue extension, subject property located between Jefferson Street and a point where the extension cuts across properties to connect with Walnut Street° He advised that the offer would be subject to payment of $12,275~50 by the city for the loss of 105 orange trees, at varied costs, and for the necessary relocation of an irrigation line ($3,475~50). Mr, Murdoch further reported that the acquisition of this right-of- way would complete all necessary acquisition to insure the full street improvement from Jefferson Street to Walnut Street, with the exception of one small triangularly shaped corner, He submitted a map for Council review, illustrating the property owned by Primus Holding Company and the proposed dedication, The City Engineer reported that negotiations are pending for the triangularly shaped corner, and he advised that calculations have been made which disclose that if improvement of the street were delayed more than two years, construction co~ts would increase sufficiently to put the city at a disadvanta~e~ He noted that the en~i~e ~treet improvement should be accomplished in one proje~t~ re~lg~Bg im a ~etter job, and was of the opinion th~ th~ extension of the ~t~eet wou~ engou~age ~tional development in the are~. 10022 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14, 1967~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-137: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-137 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND PRIMUS HOLDING COMPANY WITH REFERENCE TO DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Improvement - La Palma Avenue extension) Roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMENg ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 67R-137 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-138: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 67R-138 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, (Primus Holding Company) Roll call voter AYES: COUNCILMEN; NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutten, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein adopted. The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 67R-138 duly passed and CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES~ On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel county taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for municipal purposes, pu[suant to Resolution No. 67R-100, formerly assessed to Fredericks Development Corporation and Security Title Insurance Company, deed recorded March 2, 1967 as Document No. 1410, in Book 8188, Page 801, Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED~ COMPROMISE OF EMINENT DOMAIN LITIGATION - UNITED STADIUM SERVICES INC.: The City Manager reported on eminent domain litigation, initiated pursuant to Resolution No. 67R-64 on a portion of property necessary for the construction of the Katella Avenue undercrossing of the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way, east of State College Boulevard. He advised that a compromise has been reached in the amount of $4,$00 00, ~nd ~ d~ed for the necessary right-of-way has been submit':ed Co the city by the ~,wners, [!nited Stadium Services, Inc., that in discussin'.4 the proposed compr,'.mise, it was agreed that the city would cooperate with [!~e management ~.f the proposed hotel and restaurant to be constructed on the north side of Katell-3 Average, directly across from the entrance from Anaheim Stadium, l!or use oi a pc~rtion ,~I the stadium parking lot for va]et overflow parkip, g, when a convention or ~,ther uvent would require such additional parking faciliuies, provided :i~ :be ..~sc c,[ the lot did not interfere with any events of the stadium. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-139:. On the recommendations of the City Manager and the City Attorp~ey, Counci]man Ducton otfered Resolntion No: 67R-139 for adoption. Refer to Reso]~tion Book A RESOI,UTiON OF TiiE E{TY q~tiNCll OF 'lite C['FY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DiRECT~N~ THE COMPROMISE ~F (ER'lAIN EMINENT I)O~IN LITIGATION, DIRECTING THE Di~EGTOg OF FINANCE 1'0 MAKh (~ERTAIN ['AYMEN'I'S tN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND ACCEPTING AN ~fiE~NT DEED IN FAV~It OF TUE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (United Stadium SeRviceS Inc. 54,500,00) 10023 Ci~ HalL Anaheim=_California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14, 1967~ loo30 PoMo Roll call vote~ AYES ~ COUNCILMEN: NOES ~ COUNCILMENoo ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No~ 67R-139 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO0 67R-140~ On report and recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No~ 67R-140 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DEDICATING CERTAIN PUBLIC-OWNED PARK LAND FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Northeast corner of Sunkist and Underhill, adjacent to Pioneer Park) Roll call vote; AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN~ ABSENToo COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution NOD 67R-139 duly passed and adopted. REPORT -. PROPOSED LEASE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY: Development Services Director Alan G, Orsborn reported on proposed lease of property owned by the City of Anaheim, adjacent to the Convention Center and fronting on Harbor Boulevard, advising that the firm of Executive House of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, with Executive House Inc. Headquarters in Chicago, Illinois, recently submitted an option lease proposal to construct a first class major hotel on the property~ Mr. Orsborn further reported that pursuant to telephone con- versation held March 13, 1967, with one of the principals of the hotel group, they had executed an amended agreement and were forwarding it for City Council consideration. He noted that the hotel group is interested in the northerly portion of the 12 plus acres of property fronting the west side of Harbor Boulevard, commencing approximately 300 feet south of the intersection with Katella Avenue~ In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Orsborn advised that the ground lease will be guaranteed by Executive House Inco, as negotiated by Executive House Group, Inc., which will be the local California Corporation developing the hotel Mr. Orsborn briefed provisions of the proposed agreement, reporting that in the event the option to lease is not exercised within 90 days, the city will retain the feasibility study for development of a hotel facility on the property, which was prepared at the expense of the hotel corporation. Mr. Murdoch reported that as of the present time, no other specific proposal for lease of the property in question is under considera- tion~ however other inquiries have been received. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims against the city were denied as recommended by the City Attorney, and ordered referred to the Insurance Agent on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton: a, Claim submitted by Robert Villegas for damages purportedly resulting from a city owned vehicle striking his parked automobile on or about February 2B, 1967. 10024 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES March 14, 1967, 1:30 P.M. bo Claim submitted by Automobile Club of Southern California on behalf of Dorothy E. Rister for injuries and damages purportedly resulting from a collision with a city owned vehicle, on or about December 30, 1966. c. Claim submitted by Automobile Club of Southern California on behalf of Delfina P. Castillo for damages purportedly resulting from collision with city owned vehicle on or about February 3, 1967. d. Claim submitted by F. C. Keller, M.D. for damages purportedly resulting from increased voltage in a city utility line on or about January 16, 1967. e. Claim submitted by Isabel V. Willhite for injuries purportedly received from a fall on city owned property, on or about December 9, 1966. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte: ao City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 67-17 requesting amendments to the Streets and Highways Code relating to administration of the Gas Tax Street Improvement Program. Mr. Maddox briefed report on the areas of concern to the City of Anaheim, as mentioned in the resolution from the City of Santa Ana, and advised that he had received a copy of Assembly Bill No. 210, pending before the Legislature, which contains some provisions that could be of benefit to the city. He recommended that he confer with the City Attorney to determine what items should be included in any resolution that the City Council might wish to adopt. Councilman Chandler moved that the City Attorney be instructed to draft a resolution similar to the resolution from the City of Santa Ana, said resolution to be written with the appropriate conditions and stipulations generally pertaining to the extension of the accumulation of matching funds from 2 to 5 years, and the possibility of a further condition allowing an extension to 10 years, together with subordinate provisions which the City Engineer may decide to include. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED° * SEE Page No. 10034 b~ Southern California Rapid Transit District - regmrding cha~ge~in-ro~r~ service~ City of San Clemente Resolution No. 21-67 - imploring citizens to show a greater respect for law and order to deter increasing criminal activity and urging Legislative reconsideration for just and fair adjudication of persons convicted of acts contrary to society. d. City of Fullerton Resolution No. 4626 inviting and urging the National Baseball League to establish headquarters in Orange County° Before the Public Utilities Commission - application of Santa Barbara Transit Company for authority to operate eleven sightseeing tours from Santa Barbara to various destinations in Southern California. f~ Minutes Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission - Meeting of February 9, 19670 g. Miq~es Community Center Authority Meeting of February 20, 1967. h~/~.~ginaa~ciat & Operating Reports for the month of February, t96Y. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2368: At the request of Councilman Chan41er, M~ Mu~och read in full proposed Ordinance governing prohibitive ac~m of pe~on§ bonding enter- tainment permit~. 10025 City Hall, Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14, 1967, 1:30 P.M. On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2368 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4, CHAPTER 4.18 of the ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 4.18.015. (Prohibitive Acts - Holders of entertainment permits) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Joseph A. and Thyra J. Bonifazi for a Person to Person Transfer of Off Sale Beer and "ine license at U-Tot-Em #10, 530 North Magnolia Avenue (C-1 Zone), was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. No Council action was taken on said application. MAJOR MEDICAL GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE: Personnel Director Roy Heissner reported on proposed increase in premiums for a major medical group health insurance for city employees, continued from the meetings of January 31, February 14 and February 21, 1967 for further study, advising that the increase would amount to 25 percent, or a $15,000.00 increase to cover the balance of the budget year and a $76,000.00 increase for the ensuing year. The increase is the result of a greater than normal amount of city employee claims during the past year, plus increased hospital rates. It was Mr. Heissner's recommendation that the city approve the increase in rates and renew the contract for one more year, the issue to be brought back in six to nine months to consider the possibility of reducing some areas of coverage in the future after reviewing the city's experience with the carrier. Discussion was held by the City Council and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Chandler moved that the proposed increase in major medical group insurance premius be approved for the balance of the year, and that the extension of the contract therefor be approved for an additional year. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that transfer of funds in the amount of $15,000.00 be authorized from the Council Contingency Account to Account No. 107-216-855 for payment of the increase in major medical group health insurance for the balance of the budget year. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ANAHEIM AREA VISITOR AND CONVENTION BUREAU: The City Manager reported on a re- commendation from the Board of the Anaheim Area Visitor and Convention Bureau that the Executive Director's compensation should be increased, and that such increase be accomplished using a deferred compensation approach. It was requested that an additional appropriation be added to the Bureau budget in the amount of $870.00 for the balance of this fiscal year, the annual increase to amount to approximately $3,500.00. Mr. Murdoch briefly described the activities of the Executive Director of the Bureau, and contrasted his responsibilities with those of the City's Convention Center staff. Discussion was held relative to the booking of events for the Convention Center facility without a definite fee schedule, and Councilman Chandler e×pre~ed concern about the possibility of a duplication of efforts between the City staff and the Vi ;itor and Convention Bureau, being of the opinion tha~ rules and regtxlations for the divisions of authority and the areas of responsibility should be set out in writing. Regarding the request for appropriation of additional compensation, Councilman Chandl. e~ noted that the Vi~itor and Convention Bureau staff are not ~'ity employee~, and in ~1~§ Op~B{og~ he had no authority to vote on that partic~lar point alone; ~ho~ i~ ~h~ld be considered together with the overall budget fo~ ~h~ ~e~ y~ar. 10026 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES March 14~ 1967~ 1:30 P.Mo Mr. Geisler reported that the city's commitment is to pay a yearly budgeted amount under contract with the Visitor and Convention Bureau, originally established on a fifty-fifty basis; that any salary over and above what the city contributes should be derived from other sources of revenue by the Bureau. If it is felt that additional funds are necessary from the city, the Bureau should submit to the City Council a budget analysis requesting such additional funds. Councilman Chandler stated he had no objection to the proposed in- crease in compensation for the Director of the Bureau, nor to the deferred compensation approach, except to the approval thereof within the current pay period. At the conclusion of the discussion, the City Council indicated they concurred with Councilman Chandler's position, that no one was opposed to the request, in principle; however any increase would be analyzed and acted upon as a part of the entire budget for the Visitor and Convention Bureau for the coming year. No action was taken by the City Council on the foregoing request. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-141 - LA PALMA AVENUE EXTENSION: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 67R-141 for adoption, authorizing execution of a grant deed to the Orange County Water District in connection with the exchange of properties for the extension of La Palma Avenue east of Jefferson Street. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT DEED CONVEYING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 67R-141 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:45 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pro Tem Pebley called the meeting to order. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. COUNCILMEN: Krein. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Aloha M. Farrens. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. INVOCATION: Reverend Fred Dommer, Lamb of God Lutheran Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Dutton led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 916: Submitted by Maurice Gale Hartman et al, requesting permission [o establSsh a coin-operated carwash; C-3 zoned property located ~outh of the inter~ecg~on of Harbor Boulevard and Palm Street. The City Planning Cormnai~lon p~[~aBg go g~§o~ug{og ~o, PC67-22 de,ied ~aid condSt{onal ume permit. 10027 Cit__~Z_~llz_Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14, 1967, 1~30 PoMo Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by the applicant and public hearing scheduled February 28, 1967, and re- scheduled to this date~ The Deputy City Clerk read communication dated March 7, 1967, from Mr~ Hartman, the applicant, requesting permission to withdraw their appeal~ On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, withdrawal of said appeal was approved~ MOTION CARRIED° PUBLIC HEARING ~ VARIANCE NO. 1850: Submitted by Atlantic Richfield Oil Company, owners, requesting a waiver of maximum permitted sign height for a proposed service station; R-A zoned property located at the northwest corner of Ball Road and West Street° The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No~ PC67-24 denied said variance~ Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by W. E. Lentz, Federal Sign and Signal Corporation, and public hearing scheduled February 28, 1967, and rescheduled to this date. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He noted single-family residential structures in the vicinity of subject property, one of which was located 140 feet to the south° Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if a representative of the applicants wished to address the City Council~ Mr~ W. Eo Lentz, of Federal Sign and Signal Corporation, 1100 North Main Street, Santa Aha, submitted for Council review a folder containing a plot map of the area, keyed to photographs illustrating existing signs, and the view of the proposed sign from various locations° He was of the opinion that a precedent had been established in this area for service station signs which are greater in height than the Sign Ordinance allows, and that the proposed service station should be adequately identified~ He called attention to the projected extension of West Street to the north, resulting in a through cross street in close proximity to the property. The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition~ Mr. C. Mo Chaplin, owner of the Stardust Motel adjacent to subject property on the west, submitted for Council review a copy of the brochure for the motel, advertising the view of the "Fantasy in the Sky" fireworks display at Disneyland, as seen from the motel. He was of the opinion that if the requested sign is approved, the displays would be blocked from view, since the fireworks are exploded at a point located in a southeasterly direction from the motel. He advised that the major portion of their business is comprised of families with children who look forward to observing the fireworks from the balconies and the patios on the motel grounds. In response to Council questioning, Mr~ Chaplin advised that the proposed sign would cause some problem at either the requested 70 foot height or the permitted 25 feet, and he reported that the highest sign on his pro- perty was at 35 feet; that the signs on the west side of the Santa Ana Freeway were not constructed in excess o~ the permitted height~ The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council~ Mr. Scott Brophy, Construction Engineer for Atlantic Richfield ©fl Company~ was of the opinion that the only possible detriment to the public welfare would be if the illumination from the sign reflected on the other properties. He advised that the proposed sign was especially designed to prevent any reflection, and the seventy foot 10028 City HAll~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14~ 1967~ 1:30 PoM~ height was selected because with the number of existing signs in the area, it was felt a lower sign height would not be noticeable. Relative to further findings of the Planning Commission, Mro Brophy was of the opinion that a precedent had already been established, and he advised that the signs were installed for these service stations to aid their business, Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that larger and higher signs are frequently being requested, and a problem is developing, in that these expensive signs are loosing their value, and they detract from an area rather than contribute anything~ He asked if the basis of the requested variance was that the applicants desired their sign to be seen from many areas, some being a good distance removed~ Mr. Brophy noted that although the freeway traffic was not the prime interest, the sign should be seen from the freeway to attract motorists in sufficient time to leave the freeway~ Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed~ RESOLUTION NO. 67R.-142: Councilman Chandler stated he found no special circumstances in connection with subject application to warrant a deviation from the Sign Ordinance, and he thereupon offered Resolution No. 67R-142 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1850~ Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 67R-142 duly passed and adopted~ PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-45 AND VARIANCE NO. 1849: Submitted by Dick H. and Eunice M. Ables, owners, requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-l, and permission to establish a convenience food market; R-1 zoned property located at the southeast corner of Euclid and Cerritos Avenues. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No~ PC67-25, recommended said reclassification be denied, and pursuant to Resolution No. PC67~26, denied said variance° Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area° He summarized the evidence considered by the City Planning Commission, and noted findings of the Commission in their recommendation for denial. Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if a representative of the applicants wished to address the City Council. Mr~ Jerry Brody, 730 North Euclid Street, Attorney representing the applicants, submitted a letter signed by the property owners giving a brief history of subject property. He noted that they had requested C-1 zoning, however at the second hearing before the Commission, it was suggested that only the variance be granted to permit the city to control development of the area, while not allowing the zoning which would permit a number of additional uses, In Mr. Brody's opinion, the granting of subject applications would not establish a precedent, inasmuch as there have been changes in the 10C29 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14, 1967, 1~30 PoM. residential character of the property, and he noted commercial development approved for similarly situated properties in other areas of the city. He felt that site development standards of the C-1 zone would provide adequate control of the property's development. Mro Brody referred to a study of convenient-type markets made by the Santa Ana City Planning Department, concluding that these facilities may be beneficial to an area when certain controls and standards are applied, particularly where an arterial highway is located in the area, even though the interior development is residential. The area bounded by Ball Road, Euclid Avenue, Katella Avenue and West Street is basically residential and the proposed market would be a convenience for the residents. In conclusion, Mr. Brody stated that if C-1 zoning seemed onerous because of the other allowable uses, the granting of only the variance could provide the controls desired by the City. Councilman Chandler noted that the City Council has previously expressed their opinion that properties being located on a heavily traveled thoroughfare is not a sufficient reason to approve C-1 uses. The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition. Mr. R. C. Morrison, owner of property immediately to the east of subject property, called attention to a petition of opposition submitted at the City Planning Commission's hearing, and advised that the basis of the opposition was the existing traffic problem in the area. He noted the high school located at the northwest corner of the intersection, and was of the opinion that neighborhood markets tend to become a gathering place for trash; and that the existing shopping facilities were sufficient for the needs of the area residents. Mr. John Wright, 620 South Euclid Street, addressed the Council in favor of the applications, and advised of his long standing acquaintance with the owners of subject property, pointing out that they had deeded property to the city for drainage purposes. He called attention to a serious drainage problem in the area, involving an underground catch basin which periodically becomes a health problem, and he noted that the property on the west side of Euclid Street has not been dedicated, which would alleviate some of this drainage problem, Mr. Wright noted the frequency of serious traffic accidents at the interse~;tion in question, aggravated on rainy days by insufficient drainage. this water standing in the streets also makes it extremely difficult for students to get across to and from the high school. Attention was called to similar areas in the city which have been apl>roved for service stat:ion and other commercial uses, and Mr. Wright was ~ th~ opinion tNat s~,bie~ t prop~,rty was ne longer suitable for residential use, due to th,_~ noise and gasoline fumes from the traffic, and that the proposed market was the best commercial use for this property. In response to Council questioning, the City Engineer advised be had not been aware of the drainage problem referred to, however the Engineering Division wo~]d invest~gat'c the matter and report back to the Council. 'lbe Mayor Pro Tern asked for a show of hands of those in favor of the market and tl~ose opposed; approximately three persons indicated opposition, and f~>nr were [ n tavor, Mrs. Marjorie E. Rumsey, 1570 Palais Road, expressed the opinion that: if the people in the residential area had known about the proposed market, many would oi been present in support of the application, as the small market would be a convenience in the neighborhood. Mr. A. K. Child, 4242 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, Agent representi~g the purchasers of the property, advised that there is an existing water well on the property having five owners, and in his opinion the sewerage problem 10030 City Hall~ Anaheim? California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14, 1967, 1:30 P.M. previously mentioned could contaminate the well. If the purchase is consum- mated, he advised that the developers would make provisions for the five owners to be provided with connections to the city's water supply. Mr. Child noted that in their acquisition of properties, they nearly always construct the markets near a service station or in a location similar to the one in question, therefore, they have developed a ranch-style store building which is compatible with residential dwellings. An artist's colored rendering of the proposed building, which had been submitted at the City Planning Commission hearing, was removed from the file and submitted for Council review, and Mr. Child advised that the ranch style could be modified to a colonial style with a shake roof. He noted the proposed landscaping, and reported that they had no objection to the installa- tion of block walls. Discussion was held relative to the people who share the well, and the legal methods of gaining the water rights in the event any of the holders do not relinquish their share. Also discussed was the elevation of subject property as compared with the property adjacent on the east, and it was estimated that the grade of subject parcel was approximately two and one-half feet above the street level. Councilman Chandler noted that if block walls were installed at the pro- perty lines, the effective height thereof would be reduced two and one-half feet, insofar as the adjacent properties were concerned. He asked whether this would affect the opposition offered by Mr. Morrison. Mr. Morrison advised that at the City Planning Con~nission hearing, the opposition was based on the C-1 zoning request, and in his opinion, they recognized the commercial nature of Euclid Street, but hoped to control the type of business that is allowed on the property. In a discussion with the property owners, he had found little objection to a C-O type of development, but businesses which would be opened during the evening hours were objectionable. Councilman Chandler noted that commercial office buildings apparently are lacking in tenants at the present time. Mr. Morrison was of the opinion that C-1 zoning could not be given to all properties in the city fronting on major thoroughfares. Mrs. Beulah Keenon, 1685 West Cerritos Avenue, addressed the Council advising that she could see no objection to the proposed convenience market, which would be an asset to the neighborhood. Mr. Jerry Brody advised that the C-1 site development standards were s_t out in the Anaheim Municipal Code to protect surrounding residential pro- perties, and the proposed development could be accomplished within these standards, with very little variation. Mayor Pro Tem Pebley stated that a good cross section of the evidence had been presented, and thereupon declared the hearing closed. In response to Councilman Chandler's question, the City Attorney advised that if the City Council did not wish to adopt the C-1 zone for subject property, a specific plan could be approved by variance. Councilman Chandler noted that the application states the development is a convenience food market and retail store. Mr. Brody advised that they plan only the single food market, and the developers are willing to install a shake roof to blend with the surrounding area. Discussion was held relative to the possibility that sale of packaged beer and wine might be requested, and Councilman Chandler noted that the State Alcoholic Beverage Control laws required that these licenses not be issued where there is a school property located within six hundred feet. He asked if the market would be developed if no alcoholic beverage license were possible. 10031 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES March 14~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Child advised that the proposed lessees usually do not open a market without the provision for sale of packaged beer and wine. Further, that there was 800 square feet of store space in conjunction with the market, for which no plans have been made at the present time. Councilman Chandler stated he was reluctant to approve a C-1 use which is, to a certain extent, dependant upon alcoholic beverage sales, when he was certain that a license could not be obtained. He advised that he would be in favor of a restriction on the variance, if granted, to prohibit any alcoholic beverage sales. Councilman Pebley and Schutte stated they would not be in favor of the alcoholic beverage sales, due to the close proximity of the school. Councilman Chandler moved that Council determination on subject reclassification and variance be continued two weeks (March 28, 1967) to allow the applicants an opportunity to determine whether they are interested in developing the property for a market without any packaged alcoholic beverage sales, and what type of business would be proposed for the additional 800 square feet of store space proposed. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 53-54-9: Public hearing was scheduled to consider request of E. D. Johnson and Company to amend Ordinance No. 878 (M-1 zoning, west side of East Street, extending from Water Street to South Street), which limited vehicular access to the property from East Street to one access only, with a peripheral road. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. City Engineer James P. Maddox reported that a contractor is now at work on a street widening project on this portion of East Street. The E. Do Johnson Company requests that the existing access drive be relocated to the north, and they will pay for the cost of an additional driveway for better traffic circulation. Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if anyone desired to address the City Council in opposition to or in favor of subject request, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Geisler briefed the history of the property, and the various access drives which have been allowed as individual properties developed. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Attorney was authorized to prepare an ordinance amending Ordinance No4 878 to allow the additional access drive on the E. D. Johnson property. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 917: Submitted by Ted and Doris M. Cornell requesting permission to establish a church and related facilities, with waiver of minimum permitted height of sign display surface; R-A zoned property located on the south side of Orangewood Avenue between Mountainview Avenue and Spinnaker Street (420-500 East Orangewood Avenue). %he City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-23 granted said conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Orangewood Avenue, for street widening purposes. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of ~he City of Anaheim along Orangewood Avenue, such as curbs and g~er~, ~idewalk~, 8~ree~ grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appur~enan~ work 8hall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with ~tandard plan~ and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall b~ posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 10032 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Orangewood Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Orangewood Avenue, for tree planting purposes. 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6. That the final parking plan be approved by Development Review. 7. That any lighting proposed for the parking area shall be of a "down lighting" type and be no greater than six feet in height. 8. That any landscaped areas in the parking area shall be protected with six inch high concrete curbs, and that concrete wheel stops shall be provided for all parking spaces. 9. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. 10o That Condition Nos'. 5, 6, 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 11o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council, and the City Clerk was directed to set date for public hearing. Mr° Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Mr. Thompson noted that the 145 seat church sanctuary is being proposed by the New Apostolic Church of North America; that the plans conform with site development standards of the Municipal Code; that the sign is pro- posed to be located in the front setback area with a face area of approximately 18 square feet; that the requested waiver is to allow a supporting pedestal for the sign at a height of three feet, rather than eight feet required by Code; that the Planning Commission felt that the orientation of the proposed sign would not present a traffic hazard. Mayor Pro Tem Pebley asked if the applicants or their representative wished to address the City Council. Mr. Hugh Scallon, Attorney representing the church group, advised that this relatively new church has religious beliefs similar to those of the Lutheran Church, and he displayed an architectural rendering of the proposed structure, noting off-street parking provided at the rear of the church, proposed landscaping, and a six foot wall surrounding the property. Mr. Scallon further advised that the church membership is currently meeting in a club facility in Santa Aha. He noted that the objections made at the Planning Commission hearing basically were that the proposed development might be a deterrent to future development of the adjacent properties. Councilman Schutte inquired as to the residency of the persons who would attend the proposed church. Mr. Ed Sackett, 928 South Webster Street, addressed the Council advising that to the best of his memory, the congregation is presently composed of three families from Santa Ana, four from Anaheim, two from Orange, two from Huntington Beach, and one from Fountain Valley. He stated that he was one of the members of the congregation, that another local family resided in the 1900 block of Oshkosh Street, and another in the 1700 block of Lincoln Avenue. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Sackett advised that they plan no school activities on the property with the exception of a regular Sunday School, and the property is centrally located for the membership. 10033 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. The Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition. Mr. Keith Presson, owner of property at 410 East Orangewood, adjacent to subject property on the west, advised that he was not objecting to the church use, however Orangewood Avenue is a major access to Anaheim Stadium, and the property owners have been discussing a planned development for these narrow and deep lots, and he requested that the Planning Department be instructed to study the matter and advise them how these properties could logically be developed to the benefit of all concerned. Mr. Presson submitted an area map illustrating ownership of properties in the immediate area along Orangewood Avenue (copies furnished each Councilman). He noted that many of the names on this map were included in the petition of opposition submitted to the City Planning Commission. Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the requested study should be made before allowing the proposed development of a narrow and deep parcel located in the midts of large undeveloped properties. Councilman Chandler stated he had heard no evidence that the property was not suited for the use proposed. Mr. William R. Reed, 2125 Nautical Street, south of subject property, advised that the property was too small for the proposed use and he noted his experience with the growth of the church which he attended. In response to Council questioning, Mr. Reed was of the opinion that multiple family residential development would be more in keeping with the residential area. Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council in opposition. Mr. Lee Vonseggern who had an interest in property adjacent on the east to subject parcel, advised that the community water system lines cross property boundaries, including subject property. He concurred with the objections previously stated. In rebuttal, Mr. Scallon stated they would protect the water lines. He noted that the church strongly believes in small parishes, and rarely has more than one hundred members in one congregation. He recognized the interest of property owners in the area, however felt that the interest of the petitioners should also be considered. The Mayor Pro Tem declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION: Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that any church group would emanate a certain amount of noise and thereby create disturbance in the neighborhood. He did not believe a wall would block out a sufficient amount of noise. He thereupon offered a resolution to deny subject use permit. Discussion was held by the City Council, and Mr. Ted Cornell, owner of the property, stated that he had no agreement with the other pro- perty owners for development of all the parcels together. He agreed that the parcel would lend itself well for inclusion in a large development, however in his opinion, it was almost impossible to accomplish such a development with all property owners in agreement on prices, etc. Mr. Cornel l noted that his original intent had been to develop uhis parcel himself; however he had been contacted by the church representa- tive for the development in question. Councilman (]handler was of the opinion that the issue under consideration was the use of the land, and he noted the truth in Mr. Cornell's ~tatement with reference to land assembly and the difficulties in reaching mutual agreements. He pointed out that the church plans are in conformance with ~he zoning laws of the city. 1OO34 City Hall7 Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - March 14~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. Councilman Dutton stated he preferred to see these properties developed on a land assembly basis, however that method could be employed on the remaining parcels. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Pebley ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Krein Mayor Pro Tem Pebley announced that the foregoing resolution had failed to carry. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-143: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 67R-143 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 917, subject to the re- commendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: 'COUNCILMEN: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Pebley Schutte Krein The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 67R-143 duly passed and adopted. ANAHEIM STADIUM RELAMPING: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for relamping Anaheim Stadium (1992 lamps), as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of E. D. Johnson & Co. E.D. Johnson & Co., Anaheim McFarlane Electric, Santa Ana Streech Electric Co., Fullerton $4,318.00 5,449.00 9,730.00 On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that the low bid of E.D. Johnson & Co. be accepted in the amount of $4,318.00. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ILLIRTiNATED BILLBOARD - ANAHEIM STADIUM: Mr. Geisler reported that the double faced reader panel vari-vision sign structure has been installed at Anaheim Stadium, and referred to discussion held by the City Council in approving said sign January 31, 1967 (Page 9941), subject to an agreement which gives the City the final authority for copy, in the event of failure to mutually agree. On the recormnendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton moved that payment be authorized to Carter Industries, Inc., for the entire cost of the sign, $14,750.00, plus tax, with the understanding that two-thirds of said amount will be returned to the City by the Canteen Corporation and tlhe California Angels prior to the end of the current fiscal year. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 9:15 P.M. City Clerk ~J b. Letter & Resolution to the Governor of California from Orange County Water District regarding the appointment of Robert A. Daily. c. Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District - Meeting of February 16, 1967. d. Minutes Community Center Authority - Meeting of February 6, 1967.