Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1967/05/31
10159 CitZ Hall~ ~naheim_= California COUNCIl MINUTES -. May 31., 1967 1:30 PoM,. The City Council cf the City of Anaheim met in regular session~ PRESENT~ ABSENT~ PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN: Duttcn~ Krein. Schutte~ Chandler and Pebley~ COUNCiLM~N~ None. CITY MANAGER~ Keith A~, Murdocho CITY ATTORNEY~ Joseph Geis!er~ CiTY CLERK: Dene Mo Williams~ CITY ENGINEER: James Pt Maddox~ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR~ Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DiRECTOR~ Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR~ Ronald Thompson~ PERSONNEL DIRECTOR~ Roy Heissner~ Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order~ RECOMMENDATION - KINGSMEN DRUM & BUGLE CORPS: The City Clerk read recommendation from the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce that the Kingsmen Drum & Bugle Corps be officially recognized by the City of Anaheim as the Anaheim Kingsmen Drum & Bugle Corps, that they be presented with an official City of Anaheim flag, and be called opon to appear at appropriate city functions~ Discussion was held pertaining to liability insurance coverage held by the city, and at the conclusion thereof, action was deferred one week (June 6, 1967) for further investiga, tion~ MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held May 9 and 16, 1967, were approved on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING -. ORDINANCES .AND RESOLUTiONS~ Councilman Krein moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution~ £ounciiman Schu~te secoaded the motion~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~ REPORT - ~'INANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE C!T'Y~ Demands against the city in the amount of $126,829.29, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved~ PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSEMOVING PERMIT: Application submitted by Donald J. Casmero requesting permission to move a dwelling from 722 Solway Street, Glendale, to 1405 East Romneya Drive, Anaheim, was reviewed by the City Council together with recommendations of the Building and Zoning Divisions that said request be approved subject to street dedication, and street and sidewalk improvements by the petitioner~ Attention was called to communication dated May 24~ 1967~ from Howard W~ and Sarah J. Doering, 1140 Liberty Lane~ expressing opposition to sabject housemoving permit. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson reported that to move the dwelling unto subject property would require removal of the existing barn and a small structure~ He called attention to recommendations of the Zoning and Boilding Divisions, noting that the dedication and improvements could be required prior to final building inspection, or the City Council might require an agreement with the applicants for said improvements and dedication- The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council. Mrs. Marlene Casmero, 140.5 East Romneya Drive, addressed the Council advising that the easement for dedication of property for the widening of Romneya Drive had been signed this week~ that the improvements would be installed~ Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition, there being no response~ declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-294: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 67R-294 for adoption, granting housemoving permit subject to the recommendations the provision FROM ?72 SOLWAY STREET, ,~?,l~HE'!M, C~L/. .... F'ORNJ_~ '5/" ~' d ':-~.:, 'v,:-::~ ds" '-:-id o~=.:, .... -! ,~i::,n,.. N> ,..': :'R-29,a duly passed and adopted~ PUBliC 5iAR:>,~G -.:,~::?&: :-- x :'v:: ,<r, v~a'x::, ;e", 9:;." 7'u~bJi.~ v-~-~ scheduled to ,.~ ~,,pmen[ Services ""',' R..-~d if--.::r:;:::c :-:.p,:'rt:e.~ th:.-,t .The Deve~''~ "' De:g,::rcmenC :~;~::t z::Fie~: ~ c,~'<:t:lnc~snc. 6 '..f ~ub]ect pu,~z_c hearing to allow (o~::ciL:~5.: Ct::':,d'~:.~ ::~:::~e:~[(::d th.'t t':?:: ~ep:>-rt tic the City Council. ~r'I~,~t5 >5:!d '?'6.'lYliYlg 1' fT<U~l~:li/.J 3~ .~5: ~:: ~':.::.W {[',::.~,?P[iCR W~w wc, uJ_d cross the ~ 4,: :: :. c. :-~.. ? }: ,:::..: !,,;S '. {' 'i ' PERM/i! ,/':l, '¢)8; 5uLm:_::ced h,:, ]',!e:,, I ~r:d P':...,!~ne N, (l;~aves requesting amendment ~'.r;.,: 5t:,.::~ ,.lt]'..~z~ ~ '-:, e..-rd .00 a. nd :008 &ppiLtc,a:o(~ 2zzs:.d = ~ ¢'1:.c .... 4Jti/c.:0.1 ¢'¢r;it t:.: de-velop subject '~ ~ -,~ State ,..,l~_,ge ~';,.:J~v'~:r'¢ {'::r :.2;1i ] t'.. ?., :_:.ii::~:_:,e.; >;,nj ?arc:itl i0, Rec?rd:~ticn of ten <i0 {:<-.:. '{, JqF :~.:<i<-:!3 dIT;vs8 between Lcts } end & ard lots ' "~' '7 to the: rear :,,b-,,:c~ "'::::::, , :> $ i::a;.:~-;:e. 2e. dic:,Ci,:.n ~'f access rights t,> State B,.-,,~!,-..~ = .... ~,,~ .......... :..~ '-~-~, ~ ~:'~ ~. z..cct~si~:~ w~t'b, th.e e~ception :~f the two :,~,~d~ d~'.~' m~::ti~'::u~4, ~:,.~-d .~,tr ~ot LO., e%cepE of the s~,utherly 0,:; f.?.~ : r: :,,ii,':: i:,: , ........ ~ 10161 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31~ 1967~ 1:30 PoM. Avenue on Parcel 10 and the westerly 22~50 feet of Parcel 9~ Further subject to the dedication by the owners of access rights to be drawn up by the private parties to run in favor of Lots 1 to 8 inclusive, as to access to the two dedicated driveways~ so that the lots on which the driveways are located will not have complete control and cannot shut off the access to all except themselves~" Mr~ Thompson reviewed the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing findings and action taken by the City Planning Commission. He reported that the conditional use permit was terminated at the Planning Commission hearing at the request of the applicants; however they asked for Council consideration of the request for access to Underhill Avenue and State College Boulevard, and for signs to be in conformance with the C-1 Zone, to allow more flexibility for commercial development of the property° Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant had any additional evidence to offer; there was no response. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed° RESOLUTION NO. 67R-295: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No~ 67R-295 for adoption~ authorizing amendment to Reclassifications Nos. 60-61-96 and 61-62-30, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A .:,£-Z©~[l,]."; OF T~iE Ci F'~ ~PUi%CIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION '~?. 735~ i~ [;~f:i~SSI!~ICATION P~IOCEEDINGS NOS. 6~-61-96 AND 61-62-30. (C-1 Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-295 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-57: Submitted by Frank L. Taylor requesting change of zone from R-3 to C-1 to allow development of a con- venience market; property located at the southwest corner of Walnut Street and Cerrito$ Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-82 recommended denial of said reclassification. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, calling attention to findings of the Commission in t~eir recommended denial of subject reclassification° Mayor Pebley asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council~ Mr. M, S~ Bernard, 615 West 8th Street, Santa Ana, Attorney representing the petitioner, advised that the petitioner purchased the property with an existing variance for a service station, which subsequently expired. Due to the location of the property, across the street from the hotel, parking lot and golf course, he was of the opinion that the market would be ~:~patib].e to the a?~,a, a~i would serve the R-3 zoned properties ~c ~i~e sou~h a.:.~.l west~ Mr. Bernard further advised of the fact that the property owner is an invalid, and due to circumstances beyond his control, the anticipated income from the property has never been realized because of the expiration of the variance prior to development. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition. 10162 ~_Anaheim~ California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES Mj?~_yS~_~_~l~l~30 P~Mo Mr,. Robert G~ Seaman~ representing the Disneyland Hotel~ 1441 South West Street~ .amvised that in accordance with the master plan for the hotel property, there were existing and futu~e hotel rooms and suites which would over-iock the proposed development~ and the development of said property would have a bearing on the hotel, Tb~t he was strongly opposed to the pro~ posed development~ ~aing '~f the opinion that there was no sufficient need for a convenience market to warran~ ~he change~ a~d he thereupop requested that the R-3 zoning be retained~ Councilman Chandler pointed cut the area designated as commercial- recreation on the General Plan map~ bordering on. the east side of Walnut Street across from subject property~ and noted agricultural areas that cross Cerritos Avenue to the north~ He asked why a neighborhood market would be more objectionable than the service station which was previously approved for the property~ Mr~ Seaman advised it was his personal opinion that there was no principal need for a service station at that location today~ although there may be at some future time; that he did not believe a neighborhood market would be compatible at the location under discussion. Mr~ Gene Meuller, representing Magnum Trust~ Inc~, addressed the City Council advising that the 7-~Eleven Markets based their proposed development on a market study conducted in the area~ In rebuttal~ Mr~ Bernard called attention to the attractively built and well maintained markets of Magnum Trust~ Inc.~ and failed to see how the proposed market could be detrimental to the area~ Mayor Peb!ey declared t~e hearing cl~sed~ In answer to Council questioning~ Mr~ Murdoch advised that although there has been n.o definite proposal submitted~ the owner o~ properties to the north has indicated at various meetings that he is interested in a commercial-recreation type of development~ Mro Murdoch was of the opinion that there would be requests made for' expansion of the co~arciai~recreation area~ or for uses which would be cc~,patible therewith. RESOLUTION NO, 67R-296: Councilman Krein stated that he saw no b&sis for granting subject request at this time~ and there~pon offered Resolution Noo 67R-296 for adopt~on~ upholding action taken by the City Planning Commission denying subject reclassification. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF THE 6.~Y OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED 'IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED~ (66'"67~'57) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILM~N: Dutton, Krein~ Schutte and Pebley NOES~ COUNCILMEN: Chandler ABSENT: CO~7NCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 67R-296 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that the issue should be studied~ inasmuch as subject property has not been included in the commercial- recreation area,~ PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 66.~67-60: initiated by the City Planning Commission requesting change o~ zone from R-A to M-1 in order to establish an existing industrial use and ~ts most appropriate zone~ property located on the south side o~ Crescent Avenue~ approximately 370 feet west of Muller Avenue~ The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Noo PC67-87 recommended approval of said reclassification~ subject to the followiqg con-. ditions: 10163 rb;t t.~s ,sv~ars .:,f s'._:h;ac~ pz.;.pert? ~h~.!i submit ~ ~.~r .... o ble offer og dedx:c}6tJor: cl a stcip of ]~,~i 4.5 .{ee~ in 'widt'h~ from tlne center line .~s tee ~c~'e~ ~' "~,~ 'ir~scent AYer~3..a~ t? N~ used [o~ street widening I%%r t~-s:~p st-:r;'8~::_ ~_._~.~' .... ,....~}-?~'... h~, ..... provided in accordance, with approved o]~zns o7: ~ilc 7'~'::h re!6 >ff~ee <f ~h~ Di.;rector cf Public Works~ !b;,{ f~-r:~ kudr-::',, ~ shsJl be ~,~F--:ied .e~ ¥,~-ui~ed end determined to be nece.~s,er,v t~: hy t.}':9 2'~ [~f ::,:l the: Fire Department. Th.~ 57he }i,i<~w6. l.k¥..RF*~:~'i[ h,.s ~_r'.,stal~ied along Cra,scent Avenue~ ~s required ................. = ....... w~tc'~ ,s:t~ndardpzans and specifics- [ions cn f{ i4 ';~ '-' ~ --- ..... ~ ...... %~c~ii~-!es Fro:posed sh~'Ll be properly shielded f r C t~ 'V i That C:::ndi(':lon No l:, a.b,::v,a me'~tic'o, sd. shall t.e cc.,mpiied with within Th~.t (':-.n,4, ...... z-... n N,s ..... a., 50 % =.;.~ 7 ~ e.b:yve mentioned~ shall be complied 7~i~h .:)'cl,x t,': fir;.al b'~:a-~'g and zoning in. spac~'ions ._,~srn- noc?d tNe '~---'~{on_ of subi,:'c~. ._ ~ property and the c ' ~_. 3.~ ~ ~,r_d a,c.,ning i~ tho i~nediate area~ and advised that the owners 0~ ~U2bjeC~: pr:3percy were ir, ~.<'.,:.?~'d~nce with the proposed change~ '~,'!lr. 'rb,?:::ps:n fuYtn, ar n:>tad that si. enough the property adjacent on the west to the sc~th portion cf subject property is zoned R-3, the trsct ws.~ s.a~;e':7 ,Jece]slpeo3 ~tnd ~-e R-] sres. to the south of subject property has been developed ~,,:~tb ~:ingie family homes~ Napor ?able? .~sksd if an?one wi;.~hed to address the City Council f~._ or ,s ~i:r;~t' :~s V~opcsed .... ':,-o.¢~ ~,~ -~ ~-;--- o being no response, dec] area RESOLUTION NO. 67R...d9'12 Counu~,.ima:~' Dutton offered Reso]_ution No~ 67R-297 for adsption: ,{.~',.~::kzr:~z,i_r_,g pre~re'.t:[<;n of encases, fy ordinance changing the zone as ,:eqdested. ;~.b ;e.:t ::o t:hs rec:>m_mendations of the Cit'v Planning Co~n:[ s s i. on Refer A RES'i:L/TiC.~: -l.l' 'iL:.E~ CL!Y Ti, UNCiL Of' THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING A~ BETE:~MINiNG 7E&? Pll'~ E i8 'i'F %A}i ANAHEIM HU~iC!FAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING S91)ULD BP; ~_~[EN[)iS]_; egND 'FNA. I' i!{E BC~JNDAR!T.S OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BI CFAbiCP;D (66-67'-0~0 H.i) Du:t~ r:.~ Krain;, Sc'hutte~ Chandler and Pebley ~'~ ~l!. r,. e Th'~ Map'.:x' declared Rasc, lui:ic:r: No. 67R-297 duly passed and adopted, RECLASSIFiCATiON NC~ 56-5'7-5&; Cemmu. nication dated }{{ay 9~: :.6,,, was submitted renuest~n~ ;'e!e~se of c .... ~' Bon,J .;ur.:~. Nc. 32585 reouired under Resolution No~ 3784,. Reclassification Nc 56~5'7-5,~; C-1 and R-3 zoned property located on the sour_h s]de' ?,f [incc:]~. Avenue The City Clerk r'ec, orted that a telephone call was received in her office tbx.s date f:rcm the ~ppiicant requesting rna,_ Council consideration be continued coo week Aci:en~ion_ was called irc) r cpc% 'r =~ from the City Engineer~ dated May. 18, · ~,~' released until comp]_etion :.. c,~:e i967~ recto~r~end~ng that Bop. d of the ~,'31 i. S~-- t _ ~r=e l?~ght:~ to be inst..4lled i~, ,.sccc~dance with requirements and ... ' ' -' ir',p specificauiop.~ c'f r'he E/ec[zzc~ Divis 2 .eaym~nt c,f street }.5~bcin~ * · tn , , · ee t:he a. moent of SYn. 3 10164 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIl MINUTES - May 31~ 1967~ 1:30 PoMo Councilman Chandler moved that the request for release of bond be granted, subject to the prior installation of street lights in accordance with requirements and specifications of the Electrical Division, or the payment of street lighting fee in the amount of $743~00, as recommended by the City Engineer~ Councilman Krein seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held May 8, 1967, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 931: Submitted by Nicholas P. and Lucy Barletta requesting permission to establish a rest home with waivers of required set- back, parking requirements, and permission to park within the setback; R-A zoned property located at 1652 West Broadway~ The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC-67-92 approved the requested use of subject property as a rest home, subject to conditions, and denied the requested waivers. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 941: Submitted by Helen Foertmeyer requesting permission to use an existing residential structure for church offices, a language school and limited church services; R-A zoned property located at 405 North Dale Avenue. Approved by the City Planning Commission, subject to conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-94. VARIANCE NO. 1872: Submitted by Southland Machinery Corporation requesting permission to construct a free-standing sign with waiver of sign location and sign area; M-1 zoned property located at 1822 South Lewis Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-95 approved the waiver of sign location, subject to conditions, and denied the waiver of maximum sign area. VARIANCE NO, 1873: Submitted by Frank W. and Edith Rose Sackett requesting permission to establish a free-standing sign 30 feet in height, and 450 square feet in area, with waivers of maximum number of free-standing signs, maximum permitted sign height and maximum permitted sign area; C-1 zoned property located at the northeast corner of Wilshire and Lincoln Avenues. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-96 approved the waiver of maximum number and height of signs, subject to a condition, and denied the requested waiver of maximum permitted sign area. VARIANCE NO, 1875: Submitted by Lee Vaughan requesting waivers of maximum building height and minimum building setback; C-1 zoned property located at 1233 South Brookhurst Street. F(;b7~97. Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 892: Submitted by Anaheim Masonic Temple Association requesting an extension of time; permit previously granted to establish a private lodge on the west side of Harbor Boulevard, south of South Street. Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held May 8, 1967, was submitted granting 6 months extension of time, to expire November 10, 1967, subject to compliance with Conditions Nos. 1 and 4 of Resolution No. PC66-130 in two weeks. VARIANCE NO. 18~6: Submitted by Margaret H. Haas requesting an extension of time; Variance previously granted to establish a real estate office in the M-1 Zone, located at 1850 South Anaheim Boulevard. Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held May 8, 1967, was submitted granting 6 months extension of time to expire November 10, 1967, subject to the plans of Condition No. 1 of Resolution PC66-i32 in two weeks~ 10165 City H.~!I. gnaheim~ S~lifcrni.~ ~. CO?NC.iL MINUTES - Ma_z=_31_~ 1962 1230 PoM. \iARiA!~CE N2:. 770~ City Planning Resoiution No~ PC67-93 was submitted terminat~i, ng ail prc;~.:eed, ings on V'az'ic~nce No, 770; previously granted to permit ?s_ztiel c~.~nv~..r~ion z:.f ~.n existing residence: to a modeling school~ property ic:c~t-ad at 1632~ We~t Broadway (Cc. nditicnal Use Permit Nco 931, granted May 8:~ CON~iI'i©NA.L USD FERFflT NO~ 598~ Submitted by G. eneral Golf~ operatcrs cf the miniatur~ gzif cz'ursa~ trampoline center and drive-in restaurant at the southeast corner of La Palma and Magnolia Avenues~ requesting approval .... ~ t' ~,~ a'b~r ~i~s~ amusement slide C.-1 zoned property located at the $~_~nheast corner of La Palma and Magnolia Avenues~ The City Planning Commission, by Minute Motion, approved concept plans for the amusement slide a~ an asscci.~.ted activity under Conditional Use Permit No~ 598~ subject tg the relocation thereof adjacent to La Palma Avenue and the Mobil Gas service station, at the intezsectiono Th~ fc, reg,3ing actic, ns weze reviewed by the City Council and no furthez' action taken cn the ~bove numbered conditional use permit and variance appiicaticns, PROPOSED AMENDMEN'~S TO ~.NAHE!M MUNICIPAL CODE - SETBACK DEPTHSi SIGNS, ADVERTIS!N~..~'S_J_N~_Q_S~2~URE~_~SA__ND TEMPORARY DiSPLAY~ On motion by Councilman Chandler~, seconded by Councilman Schutte, public hearings before the City Council were scheduled June 127, 1967, 1~30 PoM~, to consider City Planning Commissic, n Resolutions Nos. PC67~102 and PC67-103, recommending amendments to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code~ MOTION CARRIED~ SIGN REL©CA'~ION 108 ~kST LINCOLN AVENUE: Communication dated May 29, 1967, from J~e Kessie:r:, Anaheim Drapery and Curtain, was submitted requesting permission to rehzng sign at said location~ said sign having been remcved and zapainted with ~ addi~i~n~' charges~ ais<~ submitted and reviewed was report f~om the Building Division recommending approval of said request, On motion by Ccun~ilmaz~ Chandler~ seconded by Councilman Dutton, permissic,n to rehang sign at ]08 East Lincoln Avenue~ with 4 foot encroachment over the public ~lght of way~ was granted~ MOTION CARRIED~ PUBLIC IMPRC'VE~,NT PROJECTS ... CALL FOR BIDS: Councilman Chandler offered Resoluti~ns ~¢os, 67R-298 and 67R-299 for adoption° Re,er to Resolution Book., RESOLUTION NO~ 67R-.298~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE 'FHE CONSTRUCT.iON AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC !MPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: THE !M~KOVYFiENT ©~ S:B3DDARD PgRK~ ON NINTH STREET~ FROM APPROXIMATELY 600 FE5~i T.? ~FP~XiMA?EL? 1500 FEET SOUTH OF KATELLA AVENUE~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ jOB NO~ 1.100; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS~ PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND $PECiFiL~.TION$ FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAiD PUBLIC IMPRO~PEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAED PLANS, SPECIFICAI!¢)NS, [iTC,; AS]D AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTIC[, iNVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF° (Bids to be opened 3uno 22nd~ 1967, 2:00 P~M,) RESOLUTION NO~ 67R-299: A RI'SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT 'PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COM?LETION OF A PUBLIC iMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING ~ND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING .AT THE INTERSECTION OF £A PALM6 gVFNUE AND MILLER STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO~ L75~B; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PI~NS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 60NS~RUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC. IMPROVEM[iNT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SF~ALED PROPOSALS ~'OR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF., (Bids to be opened June 22nd~ 196'7~ 2~00 P,M,) Roll call vote: 101~6 Cit'~2 Hali- Anaheim~ :]]~lifcroJa ~, COB~NCIL MINUTES -May 31, 19674 1:30 PoMo AY ES t CO [Nfl l I,MEN: NqES ~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None The Ma77cr declared Resolutions N©so 67R-298 and 67R-.299 duly passed and ~dopted~ RESOLUTION N[~. 67R-.300; Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No~ 67R-300 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONFIRMING THE ITEMIZED WRITTEN SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS SHOWING THE COST ©~' WEED ABATEMENT IN FRONT OF OR ON EACH SEPARATE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE CITY W!~:.ERE SUCH WEEDS H&VE BEEN REMOVED OR ABATED BY THE CITY, AND DIRECTING THE FILING OF A CERTIFIED COPY THEREOF WITH THE COUNTY AUDITOR. Roll call veto; AYES: CO UNO I IiMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-300 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of one Billing Machine and one Accounting Machine, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid, that of National Cash Register Coo: National Cash Register COo, Santa Ana Burroughs Corpo, Santa Ana I~BoMo Corp. Remingt~n Rand $:.6,800.56 12,I58.43 No Quote No Quote On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that low bid gf National Cash Register Co., be accepted and purchase authorized in the total amount of $6,800.56 including tax. Councilman Krein sec~nded tbe mcticno MOTION CARRIED° RESOL~IION N©o 67R-301: On the recommendations of the Director of Public Works, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No0 67R-301 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A. RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE BY THE CiTY b~DER THE STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1931. (Street Lighting District 1967-1 - Tract No. 2309, Work Order No. 1147) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COL~CILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No0 67R-301 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOo 67R-302: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 67R-302 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO T~ MAKE CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1931, DESCRIBING THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE, NAMING THE STREETS UPON WHICH THE IMP~)¥EMENTS ARE TO BE MADE, REFERRING TO THE REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS ON FII,E IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, FIXING THE PERIOD OF TIME FOR WHICH THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE MADE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS~ (Public hearing June 27, 1967, 1:30 P,Mo) 10167 Ci'tv Hai.1.._z,..J.~?,3~im~ C~.iifornia ~- COUNCI. I: MINUTES -May 31, 1967, 1:30 PoM: R:il call Ni!E;i; ,;3,3'ilNCi LMEN: Dutt:?n, Krein> Schutte~ Chandler and Pebley Nc, ne None The MaN,;r deciared Resc. lution No, 67R-302 duly passed and adopted° ' ",~-' ':,-' ': ,x.?} RESk~,~I._~-.~ , 6'?Rq~02: '.~n t~,e rec,~':mxnendati, ons of the City Manager, Councilmn Ch~ndla'r ~;ff~:red Res:::luti~.;n No~ 6~R=303 for adoption, R .....r t~: Resol uti. }n Bc::k A RESOLUTi.2N OP %'RE OlT~' C.3i~SiL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING GREEN ...... R~:-ED THE.ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE, AND REPEALING FEES TO BE c~a "- ,AT RESOLUT!PN NOo 63R~652. (Effective July 1, 1967) call v?te: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None Nc. ne The Mai?or declared Resolution No. 67R-303 duly passed and adopted~ CORRESPONDENCE; The fallowing correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Dutton: a, City ,;~f Tustin irea General Plano Before tNe Public Utilities Commission - application of Los Angeles kirways~ !nc. f~r an increase in intrastate air passenger fares~ State ef 6alJfc'rnia~ Division of Highways, invitation to public hearing regarding pr.:pposed location c~ Route 39 Freeway between Route 1 Freeway, in Huntington Beach~ and Lampson Avenue, The Cit:v Manager advised that a report would be made to the City C:,unci.] r~garding the pr~pesed location of Route 39 Freeway at the next Council meeting. June 6~ 1967~ MOTION GARRiED~ ORDIN2~NCE NO~ 2392; Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance Nco 2392 for adoption° Refer' AN ORDIiR~NCE OF THE CITY OF &~&HEIM g_MENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM HL'NiCiPAi, OODE Ri~2ATING TO ZONING° (66-67.~41 - C-.2) cai] vete; AYES: CO UNC! I,M_EN: NOES: COUNCI. LMEN: ABSENT; COUNCi I&iE.N ~ Duttcn, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None Mayor Pebley declared Ordinance No., 2392 duly passed and adopted, ALCOHOLIC BEVE~A. GE LICENSE APPLICATIONS; The following applications were presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information; a, Appiicatio~ submitted by' Elmo and Sue K~ Decker for Person to Person Transfer of Off~.Sale Beer and Wine license at U-Tote-M Market, 541 South State College Boulevard (C.-i zone). bo Application submitted by Phillip Mitchell for Person to Person Transfer of Off-Sale Beer and WTne license at Phil's Ranch Market #2, 555 South Anaheim Boulevard (C-3 zone)° No Council action was taken on the foregoing applications. 10168 Ci. tv Ha;j:_~ in. ab~~:f'?~l~nia COUNCIL MINUTES -. May 31~ '1967, 1:30 P.Mo ANAHEIM S~ADIb~.- MODi~'iED FEE SCHEDULE: Discussion was held on a recommended modified fee schedule for the .Anaheim Stadium, to be used as an alternate for special events urder certain, conditions. Mr. Murd. och reported that the modified schedule would provide for the fellowing~ Seated Events: $5~000.00 basic charge payable in advance, plus 10 percent of all gross sold admissions~ Concess~or~.s receipts to be shared, 2/3 to the City, and 1/3 to the lessee. Parking receipts and expense to be that of the City. Non-.Seatin~ Events: 10 percent of total paid admissions, plus 110 percent of all costs and services rendered to cover amortization, etco Parking receipts and expense to be that of the City. Concession revenues to be that of the City. At the conclusion of the discussion, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, Alternate Fee Schedule, as briefly outlined above.? was apprc~vedo MOTION CARRIED. CITY PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGgAM: Reference was made to communication dated May 23, 1967, from Insurance Consultants Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc~ recommending termination of the city's current property insurance policies, effective July 1, 1967, and new coverage placed, consolidating the Convention Center with the City's Basic Property Program° Also recommended was that competitive bids be secured from any interested agent or broker who is a resident of Anaheim. Due to a possible conflict of interest, Councilman Chandler abstained from the discussion and action on this issue. The City Manager called attention to the fact that the current method of insurance coverage is through an insurance association. At the invitation of Mayor Pebley, Mr. William J. Walker, representing the Anaheim Insurance Agents Association, advised that the Association is composed of a large majority of the active insurance agents in the city, and in his opinion~ the difference in the recommended competitive bidding and the current method of going through the Association is that there would be a number of bids from agents outside the Association, and possibly some agencies would withdraw from the organization in order to be eligible for bidding. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Walker advised that all members of the Association make a cOnsiderable effort to obtain the lowest possibl'e', premium price for municipal insurance coverage. Discussion was held by the City Council, City Manager and City Attorney, and it was the consensus of the City Council that there was no basis for a change in the present policy of obtaining property insurance through the Anaheim Insurance Agents Association; thereupon it was moved by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Schutte, that the consolidation of the Convention Center with the City's Basic Property Insurance Program be approved, current policies to be terminated or negotiated by July 1, 1967. Councilman Chandler abstained from voting, MOTION CARRIED° RECLASSIFICATION NOo 61.-62-46 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 65-66-59): Request of Delmar Pebley for waiver of certain conditions, pursuant to Resolutions Nos. 62R-183 and 62R-30~ was submitted; proposed C-1 property located at the southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Water Street, being one of three parcels included in Reclassification No. 61-62-46 (Lot 14). Subject parcel was subsequently included in Reclassification No. 65-66-59, initiated by the City Planning Commission for C-0 zoning of certain properties along Harbor Boulevard (Resolution of Intent No. 66R-68). 10169 C_i_t_~y~_aji_l~.~_Ana_~b~i__.m.._~~ i]iaiifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1967~ 1.~30 PoMo Th~ ~7. ity Council at their meeting held May 23, 1967, reviewed subject r~'~q,~est t~gether with recommendations of the City Engineer, and c~'ntir;~ed the. ~.,.tter t~ this date t~ allow wisual inspection of the property~ Because cf a p~ssible conflict of interest~ Mayor Pebley and Councilman Chandler withdrew from the discussion and action cn this issue~ and Mayor Pr:~ Tem Schutte assumed chairmanship of the meeting~ Mayor Pr~~ Tem Schutte reviewed subject request, and the discussion held at the. previous Council Meeting~ Councilman Krein advised of his inspection of,the property, noting that there is a serious problem in meeting the alley dedication requirement in order to finalize the zoning~ He was of the opinion that a solution would be to require an irrevocable o~er of dedication for. the Widening of the alley, to be exercised only at such time as the entire~area~is developed for commercial purposes~ ~[iity Engineer James P~ Maddcx noted that a study made approximately two years ago determined that the alley on the easterly side of subject property could be used as a one-~way alley, and in his opinion, the suggestion made by ~ou~cilman Krein was practical~ Mr~ Delmar Pebley, Petitioner, addressed the City Council advising that he preferred not to obligate any further dedication of subject property~ He noted the fact that his building, approved by Variance Noo 369, was required to be set back 10 feet further from the front property line than cnrrent provisions require; he again stated his preference for C~.i zoning~ Council discussion was held, and City Attorney Joseph Geisler pointed out that the finalization of C-i zoning on subject parcel would allow the building to be set ten feet closer to the front property line, however any expansion, structural change or relocation of the building on the property would constitute redevelopment, and under the' sugge~ted~ irrevocable o~fer of dedication, would require the additional alley dedication° Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson advised that the C-O zone had been recommended by the City Planning Commission in order to eliminate the need for deed restrictions for business and professional office uses, Mrs~ Ann Madison, of Madison Realty, questioned the difference between C~-O zoning and C-1 zoning with deed restrictions, as related to ~.dentificatiop signs for the property° Reference was made to Condition No~ 7 of Resolution No, 62R-32, approving C-1 zoning on subject property, which states that any proposed signs otbez~ than ~nlighted signs having a maximum area of 8 square feet shall be submitted tc and approved by the City Council, RESOI,UTION NOo 67R-304: At the conclusion cf the discussion that followed, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No~ 67R-304 for adoption., amending Resolution No. 62R-.32, Reclassification No~ 61-~62~-46~ by adding the following condition: "%he filing of an irrevocable o~fer of dedicaticn of three feet for alley widening purposes, and two additional feet for public utility easement, to be made at the time the property is redeveloped or structurally changed"° Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLU- TION NO, 62R-32 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 61-62-460 (C-l, Lot 14 - Adds condition) Roll call vote: 10170 _C_it~~ Ha__jl.~_~J.naheim~Ca__lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES May 31, 1967, 1:30 P.Mo AYES: N~DES: T~JMPO~g. RiLY ABS~N%: ABSENT: COi~-NCI LMEN: COUNCILMEN: C OL~NC I IMEN: C O [7NC ! LME N: Dutton, Krein,and Schutte None Chandler and Pebley None The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 67R-304 duly passed and adopted. Mayor Pebley and Councilman Chandler returned to the Council Table, and Mayor Pebley resumed chairmanship of the meeting° DYKE WATER COMPANY - REFUND OF CHARGES, PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DECISION NO. 72496: On report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton moved that the City Council approve amendment to proposed plan of interim rate refund to verified customers of Dyke Water Company residing within the cities of Garden. Grove, Anaheim, Westminster and Huntington Beach, for increased water rates, as set forth in Public Utilities Commission Decision No. 72496, Case Ne. 5841, dated May 23, 1967. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED BUDGET 1967-68: City Manager Keith A. Murdoch presented the proposed Budget for the year 1967-68, together with the following message: "To the City Council and Citizens of Anaheim: The program for next year's operation, as expressed in the proposed budget for 1967~68, is primarily an operating budget, although it does include some sizeable capital improvements which cannot logically be postponed. This budget does not carry out the initial phase of a tentative long range capital improvement program, It is doubtful that much of the long range program can be carried out on a pay-as-you-go basis. The capital improvements are too costly to include in any single year's expenditures, therefore, many should be financed ena long range basis consistent with the usable life of the improvements. Anaheim's capital improvement requirements have not had a good community appraisal since 1959, when a Citizen's Committee of approximately one hundred persons studied the community's needs in considerable detail. With such major items facing the city as additional fire stations; an alley reconstruction program; continued expansion and acquisition of electrical system; purchase and development of park sites; completion of telemetry for the utilities system; extension of water system, various maintenance buildings; addition to the police facility; construction of a city hall; continued street widening; continuation of storm drainage construction and sewerage; completion of development of existing parks, including additional swimming pools; library branch construction; build-up of bond inventory; installation of additional traffic signals and safety devices; construction of rifle, skeet and archery range; additional golf courses; participation in downtown redevelopment and other improvements, a determined effort should be made to provide those improvements deemed essential. It is suggested that the City Council consider the appointment of a new Capital Improvement Committee to critically review and analyze the needs of the community in light of the developments of the past few years and bring the 1959 Committee recommendations up to date. In the meantime, this year's budget of $33,573,392 can be met without increase in property tax rate for the 16th consecutive year. The adoption of a cigarette tax, however, will increase revenue by about $300,000. Examination of present water rates indicates that there should also be an upward adjustment of rates applicable to customers served outside of the city limits. No adjustments are contemplated for utility rates ~or An&heim residents~.~or customers inside the city limits. The budget shows an increase of $4,353,309 or 14.9%, although only $200,000 of this amount is expected from property taxes. Much of the increase in both revenue and expenditure is due to the opening of the Convention Center. It is expected that the Center will be able to operate in the black even in its first year. Present bookings and estimated revenues give a strong indication 10171 City Hall~A_~_nahe_i~m_z Ca]iforni~ - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1967, 1~30 .Po. Mo in this directi~n, if diligence is exercised in operation~ Total expected reve~ue from Convention Center operation will be $1,631,317. The Room Oc.c~panc/ Tax will probably reach $525,000~ Sales and promotional activities for Stadium and Convention Center evepts reflect increases in the Visitor and Convention Bureau contract and in the Fublic tnL)rmation Office budget as well as the direct costs shown in the Stadium and Convention Center budgets~ The Utilities Department budgets with an increase of $1,566,698 make up m~.~st <~f the remaining budgetary increase~ Purchases of additional wholesale electricity ~or distribution to an increasing number of customers at favorable rates increase the budget by $810,000~ Additional water quantities, a higher rate for water purchased from the Metropolitan Water District and an increase in the Orange County Water District "pump tax", all combine to increase the amount needed for water pumped and purchased by $220,250° Additional monies needed to complete the Walnut Canyon Reservoir partially offset by a reduction in the amount needed for water main extensions, bring the total increase in the Water Division budget to $413,226~ Initial construction of the Yorba Electric Substation in the northeast industrial area together with other additions to the electrical system and the aforementioned additional electricity purchased add up to an increase cf $1,153,472 in the Electrical Division budget° An increase in employee retirement system costs of at least $159,980 is caused primarily by a premium adjustment due to additional benefits authorized since the last actuarial study 4 years ago~ The Stadium budget shows an increase of $467,502 due mainly to the inclusion cf a full year's rental payment to the City of Anaheim (California) Stadium~ Inc~ The Police Department budget shows an increase of $187,181 which includes a small addition to the south side of the Police Building and some additional personnel. The Fire Department budget shows an increase of $174,844, reflecting a new station, some additional personnel, and the operation of an alarm system. Although the Park Department shows an increase of $111,209, reflecting additional personnel to maintain an increase in developed acr'eage and a continuation of the development program, nothing has been provided again this year for new park land acquisition. Other departments show lesser increases, but several show decreases, reflecting a reduced activity in building construction and related activities. Revenues from construction activities are down approximately $500,000 from last year, while much of the personnel normally'required for this activity has been shifted to catch up on maintenance~ Forecasts indicate an upswing in construction by late autumn. Engineering services are already feeling this Upsurge. The City Manager's office will be restructured to provide an adminis- ~' trative research team. No additional personnel will be required for this restructuring, The team will concentrate on systems analysis throughout the City's operation to increase efficiency and quality° It will also carry a continuing budget review responsibility~ Better enforcement of zoning laws is now available through a shift of personnel in Development Services, The public assembly regulations will be better enforced with the addition of one fire inspector and occasional detailing of other fire personnel to evening and night inspection duties. The Park and Recreation Department is concentrating on a rather new concept of recreation supervision. The spot light is on training of volunteers and maximum use of volunteer programs. Varsity athletes have 10172 ~ ~ ~ ~ ....... ('~i~'j~-i MINUTES '- May 'ii ] 9.67~ 1~ 30 PoMe .Cir'~_~2C..~al~ .Anaheim~ C~lif>>rnia ~' shown ccn. sider~.'t<~e intelest in s-.~per?'ising and training ;_~thel's in their special_ties ~ An 'up~.sua] e::~:ampi~ ~ f sch ~-.:.i .c.~tv c,~op~.raticn is recommended to provide a little the~ter~ i. mproveme~t of: t.be .ld a~ditorium at L~_:a[a School i.s the least expensive method :3.:f cre~t:i, ng ~. l~--cati,~:n f~r ~.mate'or dr~?.m~ and music activity~ An initially e::xpensive b'~t l~bor sa'ring electrical line truck is now av'ai, iable icr e]ectrica] c~nstr.~cticr and ma. intenanc, e. Providing this type cf equipment will lad:~ce cc~nstr,~ction and meintenapce ccsts~ g. swing shift ~:~r mechanical m~intenance i.s being inaugurated to substantially reduce d~wn time <~f vehic]es and equipment~ We expect considerable crew time wii] be sa~ed with this prccedu, re~ No additional personnel is required tc provide this ser~ice~ A Centrex Telephone System s'hc.~ld be in service by November to provide better response to customer calls and wi. Ii e~able the city to operate the telephone system without additional perscnne]~ These are some of the hi. gh]igbts of the prc.~pcsed 1967~-'68 budget~ Others are covered in the departme, ntal sections~ Although this budget has been. the most di.~ficult so far in my experience, I hasten tc express my gratitude to the department heads and supervisors for their realistic and understanding appr~Jach to programming activities within their areas of responsibility. I am pr<~,~d c~ our emplo]yaes and the cooperation and leadership provided by tb. em~ All of us are grateful for the inspiration ccntinua!ly provided by' the City Council and the citizens of Anaheim~ The challenge of leadership continues~ Anaheim has accepted that Chal] enge ~ Respectfully s~bmitted, /s/ Keith Ao Murdcch Keith Ao M,~rdoch C~ty Manager On motion by Councilman Krein~ seconded Dy Cc,~ncilman Dutton~ the City Clerk was instructed t¢ sched~le public hearing to conside~ the 1967-.68 Budget~ June 13~ 1967, 1:30 P~M. MOTION CARRIED° FIREWORKS DISPLAYS = AN~_HEiM $%A~iOMt Applfcaticn by Atlas Fireworks Company, dated May 25~ ]967~ for permit to conduct limited fireworks displays at Anaheim Staditm~ June~ 9th and 30th~ !967~ in connection with the California Angels baseball games~ was submitted~ On the recommendations oi the City' Manager and the City Attorney, Councilman Krein moved that permissior~ for the two displays be granted as ~equ. ested, subject tc approval by the Fire Chief; further, that the City Attorney be instructed to pre,pare draft of! a ~,~un¢:ii Policy for administrative handling of fireworks display permits throughout the city~ where such requests are in. accordance with provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code and recom- mendations of the Fire Chief and the State ~ira Marshall, Councilman Dutten seconded the moticno ~>Ti©N INVITATIONt lnvitatic:n was extended tc the City' Council by the Southern California Edison Company to attend a luncheon with representatives of the Company, Wednesday June 7, 1967~ ~t the Golden Phesant Restaurant~ GENERAL PIAN AivfE~M]~.~NT NO. 90~ Council decision on ~eD. eral Plan Amendment No~ 90 was continued from the meeting of March 21~ 1967 to June 20~ 1967 tc allow the City Planning Commission to coDduct a city-wide study o~ residential homes fronting on arterial highways; said amendment involving properties briefly described as located on East Street, between Lincoln and La Palma Avenues: 10173 City Hall~ Anahei~ Cslifc, rnJa ~' C,~PL'NCi. t MiN!TTES ,-May 31~ 1967~ 1:30 P,~M. O~ mc'~tion b~~ C,~uncilman Chandler~ seconded by Councilman Dutton, the Citi~ Cler~ was instructed to ~urther continue the decision of General Plan Amendment Nc~ 90 fr,?m June 20 tc~ ~ugust 1~ 1967, 7:00 P~Mo, in accordance~ with the rec~mend~tic~ns of the Development Services Department te atlcw fo~ submissio~ ~>~ ¢ity'~wide fr~nt~en report~ MOTION CARRIED° APPOINI~MENTS: App~int~ent~s by Mayer Pebley~ as follows, were ratified by the City Council: C~unc.i. lman ~ j. Schutte ~. Rlternate Delegate to the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 2 and 3~ Ceuncilm~n Fred T. Krein -, Mosquito Abatement District~ Councilman Odra L~ Chandler .- Fly Abatement District. Councilman Jack C~ Dutton ~ Re-affirming appointment to Park and Recreation Commission (term ending June~ 1968). EXECUTIVE SESSI~.~: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to Executive Session. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED~ (4~15 PoM.) RECESS: The City C~uncil returned from Executive Session &nd recessed to 7:00 P.M~, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRiED~ <5:25 PoM.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein~ Schutte, Chandler (entered the meeting 7:10 P~M.) and Pebleyo CCUNCILMEN: None, CITY MANAGER: Keith Ao Murdoch~ CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler= CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James Po Maddox, ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thcmpson~ ASSOCiATE PI~NNER: Marvin Krieger. PARKS AND RECRFATiCN DIRECTOR: John Collier, INVOCATION: Reverend Walter J~ Vernon, of the First Congregational Church, gave the invocation° F!AG SALUTE: Councilman Krein led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-305: On the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 67R-305 for adoption. Refer t,p Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION 01~ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A PROPOSED LEASE WITH SAVANNA SCHOOl. DISTRICT FOR THE LEASING OF CERTAIN PREMISES FROM SAID SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR A PUBLIC PARK AND PLAYGROUND; AND AUTHORIZING THE M~AYOR RND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID LF~RSE FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY~ (Hansen Elementary School) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-305 duly passed and adopted. PARK SITE - STODDARD SCHOOL: Parks and Recreation Director John Collier displayed a colored sketch of plans for public park in conjunction with the Stoddard Elementary School, 15 acre site located on the west side of Ninth Street, south of Katella Avenue (copies furnished each Councilman). For information of the City Council~ he noted that the proposed development is in accordance 10174 ~Haii~ A.nahe~m~ = ~'~- -~- _ '~"~xq~t'.~ Mai 3i~ 196'?~ 1~30 PoMe with the ccnti.r~ui, ng pr.~gra'm a>f the dity w~rking together with the School District fc'r j:J_~t d.e'vei:~:.pm.e~t '~ sc'n~:'~is ~nd parkso Mr~ ~'3~llier ~ep._~t~d c~.~t th~ pl ~ plan ?~s 5e.:en reviewed by the Parks and Recre~.t]~?n 6-:~ssi~n ~'nd the Sch' :1 B~-.~rd~ He n~-~ted the loca® tion ~f the vari~.~s sc~,~.~'i ~%:,.p.d pa~k fs. cilities.~ ~nd th~ park. lng ares which would serve both f:=~..i]ities~ &l~. u ted was the meth~,d used t~ solve a drainage problem ~'n the pr~oerty. (f: :uncilm.~n _;handler ,~tc~r~d the meeti, ng~ At the invitati,;n :-.'f. u%~e City C:_'uncii~ Mr. David Snow, President of the Anaheim Eiement,~.ry Scho.~i District B::ard~ came forward and introduced the other members of the B~:.ard~ Messrs. Victor Franzen~ Delmar Pebley, Lewis R. Mote~ and Schoc, 1 Superintende~t~ Dr, R.:'bert E. Shanks. it was nou. ed that the (~,ity ,Souncil t,:ok action earlier in the meeting approving t~e pl.:~ns ~,:~r the St~:dd,~.rd Park impr~>vement, and to authorize the advertising for bids for said deve!opmento No further acti.~n was taken by the (:ity Council~ PUBLIC H~RING - REC.~SSiFiCA%LON N'~P. 66=67'~8 A~ ~3ONDI%:!ONAL uSE PE~iT NO~ 935: Submitted by Max F. and May li~ Hiltscher requesting change cf zone from R-3 to C-i~ and permission t~ establish a walk=up restaurant; property briefly described as located on tBe ca, st side cf State C~.llege Boulevard between La Palma Avenue and Romneya Drive (1100 North State College Boulevard), The (:ity Planning Commissi,~n p~rsus~nt to Resolution No. PC67-83, recommended denial ~;f s,~.id reclassification~ ~.nd pursuant to Resolution Nee PC67.-84, denied sa. id conditi:?nal use permit. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property~ immediately adjace.t cn the nc. rth t,~ C-,1 z.~'ned shopping center under constructi'_n.~ and called attention t~ e~.isting uses and zoning in the immediate area. He sununarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the Citv Planning (.ommissi..n~ and n(,ted findings ~.;f the Com~nission in recemmending denial of subject applica, tions~ Mayor Pebiey asked if the applicants or their representative wished to address the City Council. Mr. I,eonard Smith~ 125 S(:,uth Claudine Street~ Authorized Agent for the petitioners~ advised that the existing R-3 zoning on subject property was established approximately nine years ago~ and since that time, State College Boulevard has become a major highway, having an approximate daily traffic volume of 38~500 vehicles. He called attention to the many recrea- tional and commercial developments cn the Boulevard which have taken place in the past few years~ and noted that the service station property north of Balsam Street was zoned R~$ until approximately two years agc~ Mro Smith was of the opinion that the major portion of the opposi- tion to the proposed walk~up restaurant was expressed by the owner of the multiple-family residential te the north~ because ~f the close proximity to the apartments° Mr~ Smith advised that the proposed restaurant building would be located approximately fifty feet from the north and east property lines, and the alley along the east side of the property would act as a buffer, He further noted the commercial property under development to the south~ advising that multiple-family residential development of subject property would result in a similar situation~ placing the restaurant in the adjacent shopping center complex approximately 50 ~eet from subject property. In summ_ary~ Mr, Smith was of the opinion that the location of subject property is ideal for the proposed 'use; that the R-.3 area to the north would eventually become commercial property; and he noted that the McDonald Restaurant operations are clean and well maintained. He submitted a statement signed by' approximately thirteen persons residing within 300 feet to the north and east of subject parcel~ indicating no objections to the proposed restaurant, 10175 Cit~n~akei~___~n~a~.li~fornia .-. COUN£'.IL M'IIqL~fES ~" May 31, 1967, 1:30 P.oM~_ Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and the Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. Mr~ Henr? Freder'icks~ of Fredericks Development Company~ owners of the multiple--famiJy residential property adjacent on the west and east, and devel;:,pers of the shopping area and restaurant adjacemt on the south, addressed the Council noting the improvements made to the apartment develop- ment since acquisition by their company, and the fence they were required to install effecting a distinct separation between their commercial devel- opment and their own apartment units~ In his opinion~ the proposed use was not the highest and best use for tbe property~ nor desirable to the living environment or the commercial property they are attempting to establish. The Mayor asked if anyone else had opposition to express, there being no response~ asked if anyone else wished tc address the Council. Mr. Luigi Salvaneschi, 24202 Stanhurst, Lomita, California, representing McDonalds Restaurants~ advised that they plan to erect decora- tive block walls around the property and to install attractive landscaping; that the restaurant would be an asset to the area. Mayor Pebley declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held by the City Council~ and Councilman Dutton was of the opinion, that a business of the nature proposed was not satis- factory~ due to the close proximity of residential properties on two sides° RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton offered Resolutions~ disapproving Reclassi- fication No. 66-67-58 and Conditional Use Permit No. 935° Councilman Chandler noted that the residential property to the north, and the commercial property to the south, was under one ownership, and that a great portion of the commercial development immediately abuts the Owner's residential development. He failed to see the line of demarkation justifying denying the petitioner a right presently enjoyed by the opposi- tion. Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that the issue was not commercial use adjacent to a residential area, but the nature of the commercial use° Roll call vote on the foregoing resolutions: AYES: COUNCIIg~EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCi!~EN: Dutton. Krein, $chutte~ Chandler and Pebleyo None° Said resolutions failed to carry by a majority vote. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-306: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Nee 67R-306 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1o That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along State College Boulevard for street lighting purposes. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along State College Boulevard for tree planting purposes. 3. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view. 4. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2~ above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 10176 .5. Ded:i.,:~ation of all pedest, ria:.:~ ~3.r~d -,~e~,~icul. ar access rights to the alley along the e.?.~t 'b,:~und,~.rv ::[ s~bj~act: property, A RESOLU!'ION O£ THE CiTY (,OUNCil ©!; 'rEdE ~[]7[TY OF A~.%HEIM FINDING A~ DETE~iINiNG T~,T %iTLE i8 OF THE ANAH][fM MUNICIPAL CODE RE~TiNG TO ZONING SHOULD BE AfMENDED ~ND Tt~T THE BOU~D.%RIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CF&_NGED~ Roil. call vote: AYES: CO UNO i LiREN: NO ES: f:O IR~'C iLMtN: ABSENT: COUNGI I~.VLEN: Krain~ Scb:ztta, Chandler and Pebley Dt~tton None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R=306 duly passed and adopted° RESOLUTION NO. 67R=307: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Nc. 67R-307 Cc,.d~.tm~r ..... 'Use Permit Nc 935, subject to the following for adoption, ' conditions: 1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification iNo~ 66-67-58° 2. That the sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along State College Boulevard, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 4. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3~ above mentioned~ shall be complied with prior to final, building and zc. ning inspections. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specificaticns on file with the City of An&heim~ marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 6. Erection of 6 foot masonry wall on the north, south and east property lines where such walls are not already existing. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOL0'TiON ~_~ THE ~-x.~v COLrNC:iL :OF 2~,'E CITY O~~ ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PEKFiiT NO. 935. AYES: COi]~Ci.LM~N: Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley NOES: COi~CiLMEN: Duttop. AB~EN%: COUNCZLMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R--307 duly passed and adopted. P~UBLIC HEARING - RECLASSiFiCATION NO. 66-67-~59 AND VARIANCE NO, 1871: Submitted by M. J~ and Marjorie Gobert requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, and permission to establish a 48-unit apartment building (Parcel 1), and a 72~ unit apartment building (Parcel 2); with waivers of minimum floor area~ and maximum building height .(Parcels 1 and 2); minimum lot area per dwelling unit, maximum coverage and. permitted carport location (Parcel 1); property briefly described as follows: Parcel 1: Parcel 2: Located on the west side of Magnolia Avenue, south of Crescent Avenue. Located west of and sdjacent to tb.e westerly property line of Parcel i, The City Planr~.i. ng Commission~ pursuant to Resolution No. PC67.-85 recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 10177. City ~{~iI Ana~eim~ California - C..oNCzL MINUTES TI~_~ the ~ners ef subject prc~pe, rty shall deed tc the City of Anaheim ~ ~trip ~f 1,~nd 53 feet in width~ fr~.m the centerline of the street, ~ ..... ~[a~lia Avepue~ fcr street widening purp,~SeSo 2~ That s~re~'t improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering ?~qulr~,.ents c,f the City ~f Anaheim ~.~l,c~ng Magn.?lia Avepue, such as curbs sr~d ~ .... ~ $idewalks~ street gr~'.din~ and oav~ing~, drainage facilities, ~r ~,th~.~r ~ppurtenant wc. rk s?_ali be ¢,~mpieted .~s required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on fii~ ~ the ~office of the City Engineer'~ a~r that a b~nd in an amount and for~ ~tisf~.ctery to the City c~f An&heim shall be pc~sted with the City t~ -~u=r~ntee the instailati~n of e.~id engineering requirements~ 3~ Tha~ the ~?wners of s~bject properS? sb~all p~y t~' the City ~f Anaheim nhe s~um ~'~f ~92.00 per front fe~t ~l~.~g Magnc~lia Avenue, for street light- !rig purpc, ses ~ 4. That ~'~ owners of subject property. . shall pa~, too the City of Anaheim the sum of !5c per front foot along Magnoti.e Avenue~ for tree planting pur-. poses. 5~ Treat a P..~.rce! Map to record the ~pprcved divisi~n of subject property be eubmitted to the Cit~y ef Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the ~ffice of the Orange County Recorder~ 6~ That the vehicular access rights tc Baylor Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim~ 7~ That a modified cul~-de-sac be provided at the terminus of Baylor Avenue subject to the approval cf the City Engineer~ That Cc~,ndition Nos. 1~ 2~ 3, g~ 5~ 6 and 7'~ aba.ye mentioned, shall be c..~mplied with within a period of 18C days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant~ The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to Resolution No~ PC67-86, granted ssid variance, subject to the following c.s~nditi{~ns~ 1. .?hat this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifi- cation ~o~ 66-67-59~ 2. That the owners of subject property' shall pay to the City ef Anaheim the sum of ~25~00 per dwelling unit~ to be used for park and recreatio, n pur- poses,,, s~id amount to be paid an tb.e time the building permis is issued. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved pt~ans ~?n file with the office of the Director of Public Works~ 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be ~,ecessary by the Chief of the Fire Dep~rtment. That Cc~0.dition Nos~ 3 and 4, above mentioned~ shall be complied with prier to final building and zoning inspection~ Mr. Thompson noted the location ef subject property- ~nd the exist- ing uses and zoning in the immediate area~ He called attention to the waivers originally requested~ and advised that revised plans of development, submitted by the petitioner, eliminated the necessiny for a portion of the waivers, That the City Planning Commission approval was based on said revised plans, granting waiver of maximum building height adjacent to R-A property on. the North, and waiver of permitted carport location, In. response to Council questioning~ Mr o Thompson repo~ted that ~he devei~opment would contain a total of 118 units on approximately 4~ acres~ Par~_-el i having 33.6 dwelling units per net residential acre, Parcel 2 having 29 dwelling units per net residential acre~ Mayor Pebley asked if the petitioners or their representative had anything additional to submit in evidence. Mr~ Gared Smith, Architect representing Covington Brothers, the developers, submitted a rendering of the proposed development in color, advising that tbe units were planned for adults, and were smaller than family type apartments, allowing a greater number of dwelling units per acre. He was of the opinion that the R-A property to the North was desir- able for multiple family residential development~ which was one reason the waiver ~f permitted height limitation adjacent to an R-.A Zone w&s requested° That the waiver of carport location was requested~ based on the fact that the carports on R-3 property to the South are similarly situated~ ,"2e M ..... ask~.t if .:.n'~-'ne elsa wi~t-:ed to ~.o.d,e=s r_he City Council for or againsL the ';wr '~l:i~t. in .'.;:o{~.5:~r.~ 2~}.1:$ °r~-'-~ .qc;e the ............. ~_.~.,~E. Avenue~ . st~ned extent . . , _ ~duo..~=.._.t t,3 P .... ' ". S2d ....... ..- the property '.'4.r. .[~psse~ ~7~.s {a~d_ted t': ~,.'.~.tew the p2a. ns at: the Council 7able~ and Hr, Thompson n_:~ed the a:ncl.:;sed cs~p.?rts were to be placed adjacent to the westerly prope:[c} i]na~ how~.¥e~' tide. re ;~/cul. d be nc ailey~ and .no access from Lhe property tc St,:c~tc, x A,;er~hs- The Me}.,.'?r asked if ~.:nvot::e el. se wislned n/-', addr ..... the City Cou. nc. il~ t'her~ be:lng rvr ~;~;D-,e~.~ d~c!ered _'_'n~ he,?ring cl;>sed~ RESOLUTJ_ON NO, 61'R.--208; C.~::uncil. ms.n scot:tLc a, ffered Resc, iuhion No. 67R-308 for ~:eo~_::,n.,~ .. ~ 5. uthcri~.,_ng p~.~,~'-'~$-':*i ,p .......... of_ necessary, erdin~:nce changing_ the ,~ -' ~ ..... ' ;-~ Cna City P]enning Com- zor~e as ~e,aues'~ad.~ s. ubj~at Lo ~'ne' t ._c.._,mmen,as.~l ~s .~ misslcn~ Refer t,.:' Rasciu, tic, r, A RES:)L:iTI,iiN' :i;~i' T'd.E 2P!'f 2i, JNCii. OF TRE ;liEf !'-r,, AN}I{EiN. FINDING AND DETER-' MiNINC 7']%%T l!Tlg 18 27 D:!' A>ilz~bE2/'d N'7.'NI(i~i.P~7~ 5ODL R.EL~TiNG TO ZONING S-ffOdhD EE AMENDE'[} eND 2r{~T ZiCE S:.'{J"i¢D.%RiE$ )Y (:~'R"fkA}.N ZC~ES SHOULD BE C~NEfiD. (66-.67 59 "R 'k~ b~:tr:-r_. 7grei. z~. S. chutCe, Chimd]er and Pebley. N..., o e. T'!~.e hJ~'yc'- dec~.ara-'d Re..?etutiop Nc., 67R-.308 duly passed and adopted, .~s'~l)l122-"l12~i~'.'~ ~.. ...... ~ tl :'2'_,z}.~i~*., R ........ ,:?-:aec t .... I ma:' ...ch~t~ te · f fared Res:',iutien Nco 67'R.-309 the Ci~y Refe'c t::, Resci,~'ti'~n Bo:,k. " q & A. RESOLUTION OF TKE :iiTY (k)."NCi! (.P T~iE (;.[I!' 07 ANAHEIM ,=P~NTING ,'ARI..N E NO, 187i o Roll AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: C:OUNC I iMEN: ABSENT: COUNC l' LMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and P.ebl. ey~ None. 'None, The .Ytayor clec,_az~.,~ Resolution No, 67R-309 duly passed and adopt, ed. PUBLIC HEARING - KECLASSiFLCATION NO. 66-,67~.6!; initiated by the Anaheim Plan- n. ing Commission requesting chsnge of zone frcm R.-A, C~.I and M-l, to C-R, Commercial Recreation Zeroes, to establish properties in the C-R area to the most appropriate zone; said area gepera}.ly bounded by the Santa ina Freeway and Walnut Stree': on the East and West, and Orangewood Avenue ~nd Ball Road on the South and Nort:h (Commercisl Recreation Aregt), The City Pia~ni. ng C:.:,mmission, pursuant to Resolution No., PC67-88, recommended approv'.~l of ss. id reclassificstien; subject to the following copdi, tions: 10179 City Hall, Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. 1. That dedication shall be made to the City of Anaheim on all streets within the area, according to the Circulation Element of the General Plan Highway Right of Way, prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning the property. 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer at the time the property is developed. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the property is developed. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot for tree planting purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the property is developed. 5. That a preliminary title report shall be furnished prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning the property, showing legal vesting of title, legal description and containing a map of the property. 6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 7. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view and shall be in architectural conformance with the structure. 8. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel; provided however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. The City Clerk read communication received from Morgan Adams, Jr., President of Morgan Adams, Inc., owner of property at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Zeyn Street, expressing opposition to the proposed reclassification. Mr. Thompson referred to the General Plan map posted on the west wall of the Council Chambers, pointing out the area designated commercial- recreation which has been included in the Council's policy for developments of a recreational nature, or a use compatible therewith. He called atten- tion to the recent adoption of Chapter 18.37 to the Anaheim Municipal Code, establishing the C-R, Commercial-Recreation Zone, and advised that approval of subject reclassification would establish a resolution of intention to rezone to C-R, all properties in the area; that this action would not remove the M-1 zoning from properties where industrial uses exist, but would allow any owner of land in the area to comply with the conditions of the resolution of intent in order to obtain C-R Zoning, should they so desire. Councilman Chandler pointed out that the approval of subject petition would not alter the rights of any property owner, as reclassifica- tion is a two-phase procedure; no one would be required to complete the C-R zoning requirements, if C-R zoning was not desired. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mr. Richard Bruce, 9200 Kraemer Road, Whittier, Attorney repre- senting Ling Altec, Inc., located at 1515 Manchester Avenue, advised that he was present to obtain clarification of the proposed reclassification, which he felt had been given in the preceding reports and discussion; that their property is located in an M-1 Zone, and they were concerned that their operation not become a non-conforming use at some future time. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-310: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 67R-310 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinances changing subject properties to the C-R Zone as requested, subject to the recommen- dations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. 10180 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 196.77 1:30 ~.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (66-67-61) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-310 duly passed and adopted. INTRODUCTION: Parks and Recreation Director John Collier introduced members of the Savanna School District Board, Messrs. Paxton and Punter, and the Superintendent of Schools, Mr. Del Smeltzer. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Chandler moved to adjourn. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 8:05 P.M. City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6, 1967, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdocho ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: John Dawson. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph O. Pease. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan Go Orsborno ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelsono ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts. Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order. INTRODUCTION: Safety and Training Coordinator Thomas Tyre introduced a number of new City employees, attending the Council meeting in conjunction with the City's orientation program. MINUTES: Approval of the minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held May 23 and 31, 1967 was deferred one week, June 13, 1967. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Krein moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded said motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $508,051.30, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY FRANCHISE: Public hearing was held to consider application made by Southern Pacific Company for permission to con- struct and operate standard gauge railroad tracks across Vernon Avenue, north of Cerritos Avenue, and across Winston Road.