Loading...
1967/06/1310187 City Hmll~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 6~ 1967~ 1:30 P~M. ANAHEIM BULLETIN - SPECIAL CONVENTION CENTER SOUVENIR SECTION: Discussion was held relative to communication dated June 6, 1967, from Jim Lyons, Adver- tising Director of the Anaheim Bulletin newspaper, inviting the City Council to participate in special Convention Center Souvenir Section to be published by the Bulletin. At the conclusion thereof, it w~s moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler, that the request be referred to the Convention Center Dedication Committee. MOTION CARRIED. REPORT - LITIGATION: At the request of Councilman Dutton, Deputy City Attorney Alan Watts briefly reported on the status of litigation pending with the American Friends Service Committee and the Liberal Religious Peace Fellow- ship~ INTRODUCTION: Recognized and welcomed to the Council meeting was former Director of Public Utilities, Mr. George Oelkers. EXECUTIVE SESSION: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Council recessed to Executive Session. MOTION CARRIED° (3:00 PoM~) ADJOURNMENT: The City Council returned from Executive Session and adjourned, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 4:00 P~Mo SIGNED: ~F~~ ~ ~ City Clerk City Hall~ An~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.Mo The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler (entered the meet- ing, 1:40 P.M.), and Pebley. COUNCILMEN: None. ~SSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert A. Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan Watts. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ron~ld Thompson. ASSOCIATE PLANNER~ Marvin Krieger. Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Pebley proclaimed Sunday, July 2, 1967, as "DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ADOPTION DAY". ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - RESOLUTION: The City Clerk read resolution from the Chamber of Commerce declaring the need for a new City Hall in the City of Anaheim, urging the City Administration to proceed with planning for the new facility, and plans for the site and the facility to include the needs for an expanded population, as well as consideration for the maximum enhance- ment for the image of the City as a major city. Ssid resolution was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED° 10188 City' Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. (Councilman Chandler entered the meeting, 1:40 P~M~) MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held May 23, 1967, were approved as corrected, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Krein seconded said motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED~ REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City, in the amount of $420,378.21, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 1861: Submitted by Victor Loudon and Alvin B&ker requesting permission to construct a seventeen-story high rise apartment building, briefly described as located at the southeast corner of Sycamore and Lemon Streets, with waivers of the following: 1. Minimum required parking spaces. 2. Minimum land area per dwelling unit. 3. Minimum dwelling unit floor area. 4. Maximum building height. Minimum recreational leisure area° The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Noo PC67-91 technical]y denied said variance by operation of law. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by the applicant and public hearing scheduled this date. The City Clerk reported receipt of the following communications: 1. Dorothy and Norval Ulvestad, recommending denial, setting forth reasons therefor~ 2. James H. Townsend, Chairman of the Telephone Taxpayers Committee, in opposition. 3. Petition of Protest, containing approximately 300 signatures. 4. Telegram from Wendell H. Payne, in support of the project. Mr. Ronald Thompson, with the aid of a sectional zoning map, noted the location of subject property, and in summarizing the hearing held before the City Planning Commission, advised that on two separate occasions, resolutions of approval and denial were offered, and both resolutions resulted in a tie vote. As result, the petition was forwarded to the City Council without recommendation~ and denied by operation of law. Slides of the Luther Tower development in San Diego were shown, depicting the exterior and interior of some of the typical living units and recreational areas~ The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr. Robert B. Cummings, 99 South Chester Avenue, P&sadena, Cali- fornia, representing a firm of development consultants and representing the Churchman's Foundation, advised of their experience in this field, and further advised that they were the consultants for the development of the Luther Tower, which had just previously been shown on the slides, and that the Luther Tower was the first of this type development in California, financed and constructed under the provisions of the 1959 Housing Act, Section 202, which permits non-profit organizations to secure direct loans from the Federal Government in order to create housing in the urban situa- tion for the elderly~ being sixty~.two years of age or older. Other requirements ~or tenancy were reported, such as letters of recommendation, income restrictions~ etc. 10189 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. Reference was made to parking provisions, and Mr. Cummings reported that the San Diego project has, as a part of the project, seven parking spaces, plus an additional eighteen spaces on the Lutheran Church property, which accommodates 202 apartments, or at this time, 247 residents° He stated their survey indicated more than sufficient need in Anaheim, and the proposed development being across from the city park was, in their opinion, an optimum site. Reference was again made to the Housing Act, Section 202, and the criteria for obtaining a loan under this section. Mr. Cummings advised that the period of this loan would be fifty years, and could be compared to a Cai-Vet Loan. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Cummings reported that it was their intention to request tax exemption of the property; however, they would abide by the decision which is presently before the Courts on the matter of interpretation of the legislation. Mayor Pebley questioned the situation, particularly as it relates to parking, should the age limit be reduced by the Federal Government from sixty-two to fifty-two. Mr. Cummings advised that the age limitation was a matter of legis- lation, and to reduce it would require an act of Congress; however, in the City of Pasadena and in Santa Monica, where they also serve as consultants for similar projects, the applicants have agreed, and the cities have accepted a Covenant, to run with the title of the land, should the use of the building change, parking would be provided in accordance with the then existing standards for that type of use. As to the height of the building and the locations, Mr. Cummings replied that the people who occupied these facilities are those who have been living and contributing to the cultural growth of a city, and who do not want to be out of the heart of the city or away from the normal activity. As to the cost of the land, Mr. Cummings advised that the Federal Government has established maximum costs on the basis of the total cost of the project divided by the number of units, which cannot exceed an average of $14,000.00, and of the $14,000.00, not more than $1,000.00 can be land costs. Mr. Howard Loudon, 1412 Janeen Way, Anaheim, owner of the property, read from a prepared statement, advising that the main force behind their efforts was to produce a catalyst for the redevelopment of the downtown area. He explained the matter of taxation as it would apply to the project and reported statistics pointing up the need and probable success of such a venture. Mr. Bernard Jordan, in an effort to clear what he termed "mis- information" that had been circulating, read a letter sent to the City Council setting forth the reasons for his support of subject project. Mr. Jordan further advised that before Mr. Loudon entered into an agreement with the Churchman's Foundation to option the property, the Foundation, the type of project, and its appropriateness of location was thoroughly researched by them. Contacts with the San Diego officials and businessmen, regarding Luther Towers project, were explained. Mr. Jordan stated that one of the claims made was that this would bring undesirables into the community, and it seemed to him that the reputation of those involved in the project would discount the possibility of bringing anything into the area that would not be an asset. Regarding the development loan, Mr. Jordan reported that if all federal or government monies were rejected by this community, the City of Anaheim could not have grown and prospered. Comparison to the proposed loan was made to that of F.H.A., V.A., and the Cai-Vet programs. 10190 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13, 1967, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Cummings requested permission for Mr. Pete Remmel, of the Labor Union, to address the Council, and Mayor Pebley announced he had just received a message advising that Mr. Remmel could not be present. Mr. Wayne Do Lamont, 1826 East Kemper Street, Santa Ana, Execu- tive Secretary of the Orange County Real Estate Council, advised that they had no direct interest or participation in the proposed project; however, they were interested in the welfare of Orange County, and were in accord with the implication of the proposed project. Mr~ Lamont stated that his presence was due to the fact that it appeared that some of the objections have been motivated by other than civic interest, and for this reason, urged that the program be evaluated on the basis of its merits and objective benefits. Mayor Pebley asked if the City Council wished to have letters received by the City Clerk read at this time. It was determined that the verbal testimony should first be received. Mr. John T. O'Neill, State President of the California Apartment Owners Association, appearing on behalf of the Orange County Apartment House Association and the California Apartment Owners Association, advised that both organizations had unanimously approved resolutions of opposition and requesting denial of said variance. Excerpt of the Orange County Apartment House Association meeting minutes, held June 7, 1967, was read clarifying the Association's stand on this issue; that the proposed high-rise apartment building in Anaheim should not be supported because of the low interest direct Federal financing, and the developer's statement that tax-exempt status would be requested. Both resolutions previously referred to were read in full; how- ever, prior to reading of the resolutions, Mr. O'Neill advised that in his opinion, if this was considered a proper land use, it would mean a complete abolishment of the existing zoning code. Reference was made to the proposed loan, interest rates, etc., and Mr. O'Neill reported that the Federal Government, along with the direct loan, will insist that those who cannot afford the established rents also participate in the rent subsidy program, which would be an additional sub- sid~tion by the Federal Government. He made clear that their interest was other than "civic interest", because every citizen in this community would be asked to pay for this building, and gave as an example some of the improvements that would necessarily be required, such as a new trunk sewer line. He stated that the organization enjoys a tax-exempt status at the present time, and doubted if the building of another project would change that status. Miss Leta Archer, 425 Leonora, Anaheim, referred to the signa- tures on the petition of opposition, advising that they number approximately 1200 people, and further advised that contrary to reports, the downtown business area did not support the proposed project. Miss Archer submitted and read a telegram received from Congressman James B. Utt, advising that he had made no commitment of any kind regarding the proposed project° Miss Archer reported on her "unplanned" tour of the Luther Towers in San Diego. Communication from former City Councilman Leo J. Sheridan was submitted and read, opposing the granting of the variance. Mrs. Cortez Hoskins, 320 West Alberta Street, presented a map indicating a few of the signers of the petition in the immediate area, who were known to them to be in opposition to the variance. 10191 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13, 1967, 1:30 P.M. Mrs. Hoskins was of the opinion that the request before the City Council far exceeded what could be classified as a variance, and if granted, could only result in a substandard development, devaluating the surrounding properties. Regarding the parking provisions and their contention that the number of parking spaces would be sufficient, Mrs. Hoskins was of the opinion that a great number of people over age sixty-two maintain and operate their own automobile for many years; further, since the residents sign a document agreeing to. leave, once they can no longer care for them- selves, this would mean that there was a good possibility that many of the former tenants would qualify and be reciprocants of the California State and County charity programs° Mrs. Hoskins failed to see the advantage in putting forth an effort to attract low income residents, as in any area, there are presently long-time tax supporting citizens who eventually need financial assistance, and to actually encourage more with low-type housing and subsidy could prove quite a burden to the community. Another area referred to was the lack of control over the social, cultural and financial backgrounds of the occupants. Mrs° Hoskins compared estimated taxes and development costs in relation to returns as they affected returns which, in her opinion, indi- cated the amount the project would actually be subsidized. In summary, Mrs. Hoskins felt strongly that the variance should be denied, as there was no need for this type of development in the community; the present property taxes are a burden, and the economic impact of such a project would be negligible to the downtown merchants. Mro Joseph Farber, downtown Anaheim merchant, reported that out of the proposed 197 people occupying the apartment building, in his opinion at least 50 would own their own automobiles, and it would be ridiculous to estimate any less. It was his further opinion that when the parking situation became critical, pressure would be placed on the City Council to provide parking from the Pearson Park property. In conclusion, Mro Farber referred to the precedent that would be established if subject variance was granted, and the fact that occu- pancy was established on a first come, first served basis could likely eliminate many Anaheim residents who over the years have contributed to the community through taxes. Mro Norbert Faessel, 500 North Clementine Street, stated that the site chosen for the project was completely wrong, as this was not a blighted area, but one of the prime areas in Anaheim, and a prime area for new apartment development under Code standards° Mr. Faessel noted that the tenants would be sixty-two or older, and further noted that none of the services that might be needed were near, and even the closest grocery store was four blocks distance. Reference was made to the present capacity of the six-inch Lemon Street sewer line, and Mr. Faessel reported that the City Engineering Department informed him that the proposed building, with 196 units would require an eight-inch line, necessitating the installation of an entire new system in Lemon Street. He asked if the taxpayers of Anaheim were expected to subsidize a new sewer system, furnish fire and police protec- tion, floating libraries, recreational facilities, etc. for this building and its tenants, who might not necessarily be Anaheim people, and who, when they become ill, stand to be evicted and then wards of our County. Mr. Glenn Fry, Jrt, 1115 Boden Drive, stated his presence was due to his interest and concern in the adjoining eight unit apartment building. He reported that taxes each year require the total revenue or rent from one unit. To him it seemed neither fair nor equitable that a seventeen story adjacent building be tax exempt. 10192 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL M~NUTES - June 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Joe White, 809 West Broadway, projected and related differ- ences in interest rates between a 3% loan and a 6% loan, the difference being, in his opinion, the subsidy of the building. RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:40 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present, and public hearing on Variance No. 1861 continued. Mr. James Quinnelly, 319 West Alberta Street, one of the cir- culators of the petition of opposition, reported that a large majority of those contacted favored denial of the variance. Mrs. Mary Campbell, 1564 Wakefield, advised of the fact that Anaheim was presently a metropolis, and what affected one section of the city affected all, and for this reason, in her opinion, the subject pro- ject was neither good on Lemon Street, nor any other street in the city. Mr. Harry Milligan, developer, 411 South Gilbert Street, stated that to consider dropping all of the standards and building codes established for the city was a real concern to him. He further advised that he pres- ently was developing a mobile home park, catering to the retired people, and he was developing parking on a two-to-one basis; that instead of having no cars, the majority of these retired people own two automobiles. Mr. John Sturgeon, 621 North Clementine Street, was of the opin- ion that a high class development could be accomplished on subject property, and that this, being one of the finest sections of the city, should not be taken off the tax rolls. Further, in his opinion, Pearson Park was presently over-extended. Mrs. Sarah Pearson, 685 North Helena Street, addressed the Council in opposition to Variance No. 1861, which, in totaling the variances required for the building, numbered 980. Mrs. Pearson noted that Anaheim had neither subsidized industry, nor people to lure them to this city. She reported that she had been studying and visiting similar projects, not just in California, and knew definitely that tax exemption is certain while city services are obliga- tory. Other facts determined by study were: (a) One community has denied the request of a second such project in a residential zone. (b) Month-to-month rental procedures provide for fluctuation of rental rates, thereby removing philanthropic assurances. (c) Such projects are usually placed in strictly urban areas, and on much larger parcels of property. Mrs. Pearson was of the opinion that the local tax burden would be increased by the furnishing of benefits requested by the federal govern- ment; further, any benefits to our own senior citizens would be doubtful, as occupancy is based on seniority of application from any place in the United States by any citizen in the United States. She realized that it was impossible to guarantee the future, however the many unknowns in this project, in her opinion, made it a very great risk. Mrs. Pearson stated that the granting of the variance would establish a very dangerous precedent, and the large non-conforming build- ing would dictate the character of future development, and discourage private capital investments; and she thereupon requested that the current restrictions be upheld, and that Variance No. 1861 be denied. Mr. Cummings, in rebuttal, and answering questions raised, advised that the rent subsidy program was not yet a reality; the tax exemption status does not now exist for Churchman's Foundation in Pasadena, and in the Pasadena application, applica~ion for tax exemption is made to the County only, and not ~he ~ity. 10193 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 13, 1967, 1:30 P.M. Regarding evictions, when a person becomes incapacitated, Mr. Cummings reported that it was the responsibility of the operator of the facility to provide and make arrangements for the future proper care of the person. He thereupon related the activity in this area experienced by the Luther Towers over the last two years, being thirty-seven moveouts. Regarding land values, Mr. Cummings advised that Luther Tower property was acquired four years ago at $10.00 a square foot, and adjacent property recently sold at $J3.00 per square foot. Regarding other similar projects and a precedent that might be established, Mr. Cummings reported that the Department of Housing and Urban Development would not permit but one unit per every 1,000 popula- tion. The proposed facility in Anaheim would fulfill the entire need as now seen by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Regarding use of the park, and the over-extension thereof, he related the occupancy factor of the proposed development as compared to the current existing factor in the area, indicating the density to be much less for the proposed project. Regarding the reduction of the age limit, Mr. Cummings reported that the Covenant that runs with the land, and approved by the Santa Monica City Council and City Attorney, provides if the age is reduced, that the parking requirements be met, accordingly. Fluctuation of rental rates are possible only on approval of the Federal Government. In the case of Pasadena, of the 150 apartments, 131 have been rented, and 125 of the 131 are Pasadena residents. It being determined that sufficient evidence had been presented, Mayor Pebley declared the hearing closed. Discussion was held between the City Council, and Councilman Dutton stated that although he was very much adverse to postponing any issue, five minutes before entering the meeting he had received informa- tion relative to the Victor Gruen report. It was his understanding that the City Planning Commission will finally consider the Victor Gruen Report June 19, and transmit their recommendations to the City Council soon thereafter. In his opinion, subject application would have quite a bearing on how the downtown area is redeveloped, and for this reason, suggested the decision be delayed until a decision is made on the Victor Gruen report. Councilman Schutte felt a fair hearing had been held, and that a decision should be forthcoming. Councilman Dutton felt that a decision on this issue would be a partial decision on whether or not the Victor Gruen report would be implemented, and would be a decision made prior to securing a recommen- dation from the City Planning Commission. Councilman Krein advised that he suggested to the owner that he build some very fine apartments on the property, and if he did this, he would sign a lease immediately for one of the units. It was Mr. Krein's opinion that this was not the proper location for such a project, and he thereupon offered the Resolution denying said variance. Councilman Chandler concurred with the position of Councilman Dutton, and was of the opinion, that there was more to consider before making a decision, and that the Victor Gruen Report should be a part in the determination of any building that is projected for the downtown core area. He further advised that all he wanted to do was to see what could be done with the downtown core area, and make a clear-cut determin- ation. If there is to be no high-rise in this particular area, this determination should be made; and if high-rise is permitted, both sides of the issue should know this and the determination should be made on a logical basis, taking everything into consideration. 10194 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO~ 67R-322: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 67R-322 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1861o Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Krein, Schutte and Pebley. Dutton and Chandler. None. Prior to voting "No", Councilmen Dutton and Chandler explained that their "No" vote was based on the reasons previously expressed, and in their opinion the Victor Gruen Report should first be considered, prior to a determination on this issue. Mayor Pebley, in explaining his vote, stated that regardless of what action is to be taken on the Victor Gruen Report, he would still disapprove subject variance, because of the financing, the many required waivers, etc., and he thereupon declared Resolution No. 67R-322 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - HOUSE MOVING PERMIT: ApplicAtion submitted by Martindaniel, Inc., requesting permission to move two dwellings from 234 and 230 Truckey, Playa del Rey to 715 West Juliana Street, Anaheim, was reviewed by the City Council together with recommendations of the Zoning and Building Divisions. It was noted that Variance No. 1886, requesting waiver of certain minimum requirements, was approved by the City Planning Commission June 5, 1967. (Councilman Schutte left the meeting, 4:35 P.M.) The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against the proposed House Moving Permit, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-323: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 67R-323 for adoption, granting said permit, subject to final determination on Variance No. 1886. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A HOUSE MOVING PERMIT TO MARTINDANIEL, INCo TO MOVE TWO DWELLINGS FROM 234 AND 230 TRUCKEY, PLAYA DEL RAY, CALIFORNIA, TO 715 WEST JULIANA STREET, ANAHEIM, CA~IFORNIA~ Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. Dutton, Krein, ChAndler and Pebley. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-323 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 54-55-6 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 940: Submitted by the Young Men's Christian Association of Anaheim requesting an amendment to conditions pertaining to sizes and types of buildings, and further requesting permission to construct a Y.M.C.A. facility with waiver of required setback for parking; R-3 zoned property located at the north- east corner of Loara and North Streets. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-98 recommended that the City Council consent to the removal of Deed Restric- tions imposed under Reclassification No. 54-55-6, 10195 City Hall, An~heim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - June. 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-99, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 940, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a 15-foot radius corner return for street widening purposes. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along North and Loara Streets for street lighting purposes. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along North and Loara Streets for tree planting purposes. That a Parcel Map to record the approved division of subject property be submitted to the City of Anaheim for approval and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 6. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 7. That the existing driveways, not proposed to be used along North and Loara Streets shall be removed and sidewalk, curb and gutter constructed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 8. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the time the Building Permit is issued, or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. 9. That Condition Nos. 5, 6 and 7, above mentioned shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 10o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. 11. That all air-conditioning equipment shall be properly shielded from view. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He called attention to findings of the Commission in recommending removal of the existing deed restrictions~ that said restrictions were designed to main- tain the quality of originally proposed apartment development in connection with the R-3 zoning application (Reclassification No. 54-55-6); that the proposed establishment of a Y.M.C.A. f~cility would nullify the necessity for the restrictions. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Thompson stated that the City Planning Commission considered the recommendation of the Development Services Staff for requirement of a wall on the easterly boundary of subject property, however this was not made a condition of their action, since the parking area would be adjacent to the east property line, and would require a wall under provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; further, any R-3 development on the adjacent parcel to the East would require a wall along the balance of the property. The Mayor asked if the applicant wished to address the City Council. Mr° Lew Overholt, President of the Y.M.C.A. Board of Directors, advised that their groundbreaking was scheduled to take place at an early date, the first unit of the plant to consist of a swimming pool, health club, administrative offices, etc.; the second stage of development to include a gymnasium, a diving pool and other facilities. Mr. Don Brown, Architect for the project, ~ddressed the City Council advising that many months had been spend in making a study and in designing the plans, prior to submitting subject applications to the City. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. 10196 City ~-~ail~ An_~heim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-324: Councilman Krein offered I~esolution No. 67R-324 for adap' ion. Refer to Resolution ]Book. g i~ESOLUTION OF THE CI(Y COUUC'IL OF Ti;E CITY OF aNAUEIM CONSENTING TO THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN DEED RESTRICTIO~:!S Fl;DH TiIE PROFEKRY i[EREIN~'TER DESCRIBED, ~,~:COkDkD FEBRUA~iY 15, 19~0, iN BOOK 3399 PAGE 9i_, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUYfY. CALiFOI;NIA', AND AiJFqOF, IZINC FdE NAYOR J~JD CITY CLERK TO SIGN T~E CONSENT 7_0 REMOVAI, THE!lEaF. Zoll call vote: AYES: NO ES: TEMPORARILY ABSENT; ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: CO UNCi LMEN: CO UNC I LMEZ: COU[','C I LMEN: Dutton, Krein, Chmndler and Pebley. None. Schuttc. None. 7he Muyor declared i-'.eso!ution No. 67R-324 duly passed and adopted. 7_x-325 Lounciiman Krein offered ,:,eso]ution No. 67R-325 RESOLUTION NO. 6 P" for adoption. Refer to Reso].ut[on i3ook. A RESOLUTION OF TIlE C£TY COUNCIL OF TIiE CI:Pf OF zkNAI{EIM GRA~iTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94('). Roll c~[l vote: AYES: NOE'S: TEN?OP, AR1LY ABSENT; ABS EN T: COUNCII HEN: COUNCI CO UN C I ]24E N: COUNCI D.~utc, n, Krein, Chandler and PeblRy. None. Schutte. None. Thc bi,yet declared P, sso]ocion ~';o. 67R-325 duly passed and adopted. PUBI.IC IIEARiNG - GENER,~& fL:iN g<~iEN1)M£N',' NO. 92: Public he~ring was held to con- sider City Plan,~ing Con~nission ~esolution No. PC67-10~*, recommending an amendment to t!~e Ci. rc~lation Element, =[igl.way ~'lights-o~-Way List of Excep- ti. ohS of the General Plan, designati~*g East. Street between La Palina Avenue o~ thc north, ond Bolt Road aa the south, as a Secondary Highway, exception with an 80-foot qight of Way. Associate Planner Narcin Krieger referred to the General Plan map posted on mhe west wall of the Codnci. 1 Chandlers, noting the location of that pot-t4o~ of East Street under cons£deration, and briefed findings of the Planniag Commission ~,rec:~dant to their recommended adoption of General Plan ~nendment No. 92. M~yor Peb'ley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council ,:elative to the proposed amen&aent, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. ;iESOLU]ilON NO. 67R-326; Councilman Dutton o,.fered ~tesolution No. 67t',-326 for adoption. T~efec to esoltttLon Book. A ttESOLUTION OF Tile CITY (,OU:-,,_zL OF I7}}F_. C]'[Y OF ANz:~!EIM APPROVING ~3.~ ANENI)- MFNT TO %:E GENERA].. PlAN I)IJSIC~ATED AS aMENDMFNT NO. 92. (E~st Street, bet:ween 1,.", Pal. ma Avenue ~'ad 15,ql..'l Y. oad) AYES: iqOES: AB SENT: C(;UNCi LNE?'<: (7() UNC l LblEN: COUNCJ The M~yor declared 7:esol.t£on No. 67R-326 duly passed and adopted. 10197 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13~ 19677 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - ~BANDONMENT: Public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of 10 foot public utility easement for water purposes; property located south of Vermont Street, east of Olive Street, pursuant to Resolution No. 67R-285, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin June 1, 1967, and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against the proposed abandonment, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. The City Engineer recommended approval of said abandonment, and reported that all departments and affected agencies have approved the request. RESOLUTION NOo 67R~327: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 67R=327 for adoption, approving said abandonment. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~NAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF AN EASEMENT FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. (South of Vermont Street, east of Olive Street - Abandonment No. 67-4A) Roll c~ll vote: AYES: NOES: TEMPO RARI LY ~B SENT: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN CO UNC I LMEN COUNCILMEN COUNCILMEN Dutton, Krein, Chandler and Pebley. None. Schutte. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-327 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING 1967-68 BUDGET, CITY OF ~NAHEIM: Copies of the proposed 1967- 68 Budget were presented to the City Council on May 31, 1967, and public hearing scheduled this date for consideration thereof, said proposed budget having been reviewed by the Council. It was noted that the City Department Heads were present to answer any questions which might arise. The City Clerk read communication dated June 13, 1967, from the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce advising that recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce could not be submitted until June 27th. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council; there was no response. Assistant City Manager Robert Davis reported that the City Mana- ger, representatives of the Public Information Office, and he met with the Chamber of Commerce and members of their Civic Affairs Committee, and went through the budget proposal with them, answering questions. He pointed out that adoption of the budget would no preclude possible future amendment. Discussion was held by the City Council, and it was the consensus of the Council to further continue this hearing would place the City in a difficult position to meet City Charter provisions. Mayor Pebley declared the hearing closed. Councilman Krein moved that the proposed 1967-68 Budget be approved and adopted. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST: Application submitted by Jo W. McMichael for sign permit to allow sign on the west side of Manchester Avenue, north of Freedman Way, was con- tinued from the meetings of March 28 and April 25, 1967, at the request of the applicant. 10198 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 137 1967~ 1:30 PoM. Communication dated June 12, 1967, from Mr. McMichael, requesting permission to withdraw subject request from the Council agenda, was read. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, request to withdraw subject sign application was granted. MOTION CARRIED. KINGSMEN DRUM & BUGLE CORPS: On report ~nd recommehdation of the City Attorney, Councilm~n Krein moved that the Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps be designated Honorary Representatives of the City of Anaheim for the year 1967. Council- man Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° AMUSEMENT DEVICE PERMIT: Application filed by Erlinda Arbls Bayles f~r Amuse- ment Device Permit to allow installation of coin-operated pool tables at several motels in the City of Anaheim, was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 3.24 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recon~ended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Council- man Krein. MOTION CARRIED, PUBLIC DANCE PERMITS: The following ~pplications for permit to conduct public dances were submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: (a) Application filed by Carmen Moreno, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana No. 14, Garden Grove, for public dance July 16, 1967, at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Street. (b) Application filed by Carmen Moreno, on behalf of Sociedad Progresista Mexicana No. 25, Westminster, for public dance July 2, 1967, at Carpenters Hall, 608 West Vermont Street. MOTION CARRIED. AN.AHEIM JITNEY SYSTEMS~ INCo - EXTENSION OF TIME~ INTERIM PERMIT: On motion by Councilm~n Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, one year extension of time to interim permit held by Anaheim Jitney Systems, Inc., to provide jitney bus services in the City of Anaheim, was granted to June, 1968, under the same terms and conditions previously granted. Councilman Chandler abstained from voting on said motion; MOTION CARRIED. To further clmrify the Jitney Permit, it was determined that said permit was not an exclusive permit. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions t~ken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held May 22, 1967, pertaining to the following applications, were submitted for City Council information and consideration: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO0 939: Submitted by An~ Park, Incorporated, request- ing permission to establish a private school and related facilities; M-1 zoned property located at the southeast corner of Loara and Mable Streets. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-105, granted said permit, subject to conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 942: Submitted by Ruby S~mples requesting permis- sion to establish a boarding house; R-3 zoned property located at 312 South Kroeger Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-106, granted said permit, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NOo 1876: Submitted by C. W. M~uerhan requesting permission to construct new free-standing sign, replacing existing sign, with waivers of sign area, sign height, and flashing sign provisions; R-A zoned property located at 1166 West Katella Avenue. Denied by the City Plmnning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-107. 10199 City Hall~ An~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. (Councilman Schutte returned to the meeting, 4:55 P.Mo) VARIANCE NOs 1877: Submitted by Skeoch Company, requesting permission for the construction of both a free-standing sign and a roof sign, with waivers of distance between signs, sign height, sign area, sign location and aggregate area~ C-1 zoned property located at the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue end Syracuse Street. Denied by the City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-108. VARIANCE NOs 1878: Submitted by E. M. Denver requesting the w~iver of minimum lot widths on R-1 zoned property, located at 712 North Clemen- tine Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67~109, granted said variance, subject to conditions. VARIANCE NOo 1880: Submitted by Andrew Gimnelli requesting permission to expand an existing residential structure, with waiver of minimum rear yard setback; R-1 zoned property located at 1232 North Citron Lane. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67~110, granted said variance, subject to a condition. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 702: Submitted by Byron D~hl requesting an extension of time to establish a church on R-A zoned property located on the south side of South Street, the east boundary being 235 feet from the centerline of Harbor Boulevard. The City Planning Commission granted six months extension of time to said permit, subject to payment of necessary fees in thirty days. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 799: Submitted by Dmvid D. Webster requesting an extension of time for completion of conditions imposed under Condi- tional Use Permit previously granted to permit walk-up restaurant, with waiver of minimum required parking spaces; C-1 zoned property located at 120 North East Streets Six months extension of time was granted by the City Planning Commission, effective January 22, 1967. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 894: Submitted by Heritmge Construction Company requesting an extension of time to Conditional Use Permit, previously granted to permit construction of a twelve-story (151 foot) office building, with waiver of minimum required parking spaces; R-A zoned property located at 415 West Katella Avenue. Six months extension of time wms granted by the City Planning Commission, subject to compliance with Condition No. 1, street dedica- tion, within thirty days. VARIANCE NO. 1817: City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC67-115 terminated all proceedings on Variance No. 1817, previously granted to allow waiver of minimum front setback; M-1 zoned property located on the southwest side of Manchester Avenue, south of K~tella Way. The foregoing actions were reviewed by the City Council and no further action taken on the above numbered conditional use permit and variance applications. TENTATIVE TRACT NOo 6412: Developer, J0 W. McMichael; tract located on the south side of South Street, the west boundary being east of State College Boulevard. At the request of the developer, Council consideration of subject tentative map was deferred, to be considered in conjunction with public hearing on Reclassification No. 66~67-71 and Variance 1885, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler.' MOTION CARRIED. 10200 City Hall: Anaheim: California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13: 1967: 1:30 P.Mo ~EQUEST - RECONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING: Communication dated June 19, 1967, from Charles E. and Marietta Lo Davis, was submitted requesting permission to commence immediate reconstruction of business at 85'7 North Harbor Boulevard, at their own risk, pending action on petition for Reclassification No. 67-68~3 (R~2 to C~i). Also submitted and reviewed was report from the Zoning Division, dated June 13, 1967. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, said request was granted, it being understood that the applicant was proceeding at his own risk, subject to approval of Reclassification No. 67~68~3. MOTION CARRIED~ RESOL'UTION NO. 67R-328 ~ PROJECT NOo 473B: On receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R~328 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AN~A~HEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL .AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF LEMON STREET, FROM ORANGETHORPE AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1600 FEET SOUTH THEREOF, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NOo 473B. (Industrial Contract- ing) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN; Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-328 duly passed and adopted. DEED OF EASEMENT - RESOLUTION NOo 67R-329: Councilmsn Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-329 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR ~AN EASEMENT FOR RO~ AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (George E./Georgia B. Taber, Virginia Lo Vaugeois) Roll call vote: AYES; COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chsndler and Pebley. None. None. The M$yor declared Resolution No. 67R-329 duly passed and adopted. CANCELLRTION OF CITY TAXES: Oh motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, cancellation of City taxes was authorized on property acquired by the State of California, Division of Highways for public purposes, formerly assessed to Gerald Edward Nearhood, Ora 57~1.5.3; deed recorded March 27, 1967 in Book 8209, Page 65, Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED: RESOLUTION NO. 67R=330: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 67R-330 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT DEED AND AUTHORIZING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE CERTAIN PAYMENTS TO THE UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK IN CONNECTION WITH THE BOISSERANC ESCROW. (Yorba Substation) 10201 City Hall~ Anmheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ NOES~ COUNCILMEN: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-330 duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of an acoustical shell for the Convention Center stage, as follows, and recommended the acceptance of the low bid, that of Wenger Corporation: Wenger Corporation, Owatonna, Minnesota Christopher Jaffee & Associates, Palo Alto $ 5,189.14 15,288.00 On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Krein moved that the low bid of Wenger Corporation be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $5,189.14, including tax. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° PURCHASE: Mr= Dmvis reported on informal bids received for the purchase of One Hundred ~ns of fertilizer, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the lowest and best bid, that of Mission Fertilizer Co., Oxnard: McAn~lly Egg Enterprises, Inc., Yucaipa Mission Fertilizer Co., Oxnard Robinson Fertilizer Co., Orange Golden State Plant Food Co., Glendora Bandini Fertilizer Co., Los Angeles Swift & Co., Los Angeles Orange County Farm Supply, Orange $ 4,160.00 4,316.00 4,720.56 4,721.60 4,966.00 5,257.20 5,449.60 On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that the bid of Mission Fertilizer Co., Oxnard, California, in the amount of $4,316.00 including tax, be accepted and purchase authorized as the lowest and best qualified bid, as the Iow bid received did not meet specifications. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED~ YORBA SUBSTATION DESIGN: On report ~nd recommendation of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that R. W. Beck & Associates be authorized to proceed with the design of the Yorba Substation in the northeast area of the city, for a'fee not to exceed $48,887.00, and that formal contract be presented to the City Council as soon as possible; and that the design be commenced and the type of trans~ formers needed be determined, so that an order for said transformers can be placed, prior to July i, 1967. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by Southern California Edison Company for damages to their overhead facilities purportedly resulting from being struck by equipment, on or about March 21, 1967, was denied as recommended by the City Attorney, end ordered referred to the insurance agent, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schntte. MOTION CARRIED~ PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - RESOLUTION NO. 67R-331: Councilm~n Krein offered Resolution No. 67R-~B1 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO vACATE AND ABANDON ALL VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS TO DUTCH AVENUE OVER AND ACROSS THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY; FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON; AND DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THiS RESOLUTION. (Public hearing July 5, 1967, 1:30 P.M,; Tract No. 6138, No. 67-7A) 10202, City Hall? Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-331 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: (a) Orange County Street Naming Committee Progress Report. (b) Before the Public Utilities Commission - Application No. 49201 of Santa Barbara Transit Company for authority to operate eleven sight- seeing tours from Santa Barbara to various destinations in Southern California. (c) Minutes - Orange County Mosquito Abatement District, Meeting of May 18, 1967. (d) Minutes Anaheim Parks and Recreation Commission, Meeting of May 11, 1967. MOTION CARRIED~ ORDINANCE NO. 2393: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2393 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT, RECON- STRUCT, MAINTAIN AND OPERATE ITS STANDARD GAUGE RAILROAD TRACKS IN, UPON AND ACROSS VERNON AVENUE AND WINSTON ROAD IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll call vote: AYES: CO UNC I LMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. None. None. The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2393 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2394: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2394 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61 (1) ~ C-R) ORDINANCE NO. 2395: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2395 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69 (23) - M-l) RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-46 - DEDICATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS, AND IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION: Due to a possible conflict of interests, Mayor Pebley and Councilman Chandler withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue, and Mayor Pro Tem Schutte assumed Chairmanship of the meeting. Dedication of Vehicular Access Rights to Harbor Boulevard, by Delmar Pebley and Nina Pebley, was accepted and the recordation thereof authorized; and Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of three feet for alley widening, and two feet for public utility easement along said alley, as described therein, executed by Delmar and Nina Pebley, was submitted and approved as to form; both items in connection with Reclassification No. 61-62-46, Lot 14; on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. Councilmen Chandler and Pebley abstained from voting on the foregoing motion; MOTION CARRIED° Mayor Pebley resumed Chairmanship of the meeting. 10203 City Hall~ Anaheim, California , COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13~ 1967, 1:30 PoMo ORDINANCE NO o 2396: reading. Councilman Putton offered Ordinance No.~ 2396 for first AN ORDIN~NCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING° (61-62-.46 - C-l, Lot 14) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Arm~ndo Mendez, Sr., for New On-Sale Beer license for Arm~ndo's Hofbrau, 3414 West Ball Road, No. A (C-1 Zone), was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Attorney wes authorized to file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverege Control Board against said application, on the basis of improper zoning of the property. MOTION CARRIED° REPORT - PROPOSED LOC~TION~ ROUTE 39 FREEWAY: Director of Public Works Thornton E. Piers,ll reported that a public hearing will be held by the State Divi.- sion of Highways June 22, 1967, to discuss various proposed locations for the Route 39 Freeway, between the Route 1 Freeway in Huntington Beach and Lampson Avenue, epproximately 3/a mile north of the Route 22 Freeway. This hearing to be summarized and forwarded to the State Highway Engineer and State Highway Commission prior to their determination on the issue. Although the proposed segment of the freewey will not come in contact with the City of Anaheim, Mr. Piersall was of the opinion that thoughts of the City Council should be made known for consideration. He called attention to aerial maps posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, illustrating the proposed alter,ate locations and interchanges, and advised it was felt the segment lengths under consideration were not of sufficient distance; that it would be more logical to consider adopting a segment from the Route 1 Freeway to the Riverside or Santa Ane Freeway, for example, rather than a five to six mile alignment. Relative to the locations of the proposed routes, Mr. Piersall advised the Staff is most concerned with the easterly route and the com.- plications in the interchange with the Santa Ane and Riverside Freeways. He recommended that the facts and data be made available for longer seg- ments, which would permit the City tc hold a public hearing and take a position on this issue. In the event that the Highway Commission edopts a shorter route, it was Mr~ Piersall's further recommendation that the City request that the northerly extension of the freeway route retain sufficient flexibility to permit utilization of the study routes. Councilman Schutte moved that the City Council concur with the recommendations of the Public Works Director. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO~ 67R~332~ Councilmen Krein offered Resolution No. 67R~332 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~NAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 66R-459 AND ESTABLISHING R~ATE OF COMPENSATION FOR A NEW JOB CLASS. (Electrical and Air Conditioning Le~dman) Roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chendler and Pebley. None. None. The M~yor declared Resolution No. 67R-332 duly passed and adopted. 10204 City Hall? An~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 13, 1967~ 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-62 AND VARIANCE NO. 1874: Submitted by Fullerton Mortgage & Escrow Company, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, mnd to permit the development of a 45-unit apartment complex, with waivers of building height, setback, distance from a dedicated street, and masonry wall; property located at 727 South Beach Boulevard. The City Planning Commission recommended denial of said reclassi- fication, and denied subject variance. The City Clerk called attention to communication dated June 12, 1967, from Robert S. Borden, Authorized Agent for the petitioners, request- ing that the public hearing be continued to July 25, 1967. Mrs. George Borell, 3035 Rome Avenue, ~ddressed the Council requesting that the matter be continued to an evening session of the City Council, as originally scheduled. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, public hearing on Reclassification No. 66-67-62 and Variance No. 1874 was continued to July 25, 1967, 7:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. POLICY OF THE CITY COUNCIL: Councilm~n Chandler moved that it be the Policy of the City Council that all future public hearings before the City Council be scheduled at 1:30 P.M.. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. Councilmmn Chandler requested a roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. None. None. The Mmyor declared the foregoing MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilm~n Krein moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 5:35 P.M. SIGNED:~ ~- ~~ City Clerk C_~ty Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 20~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. PRESENT: DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrens. The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim was called to order by the Deputy City Clerk and adjourned for lack of quorum to the next regular meeting, June 27, 1967, 1:30 P.M. ADJOURNED: 1:30 P.M. Deputy City Clerk