Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1967/09/26
10374 C~ty Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PR ES EN T: ABSENT: PR ES EN T: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley COUNCIL~N: None CITY MANAGER: Keith Ao Murdoch ASSISTANT TO CiTY MANAGER: Fred Sorsabal CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Alan G. Orsborn ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson CITY ENGINEER: James Maddox TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Edward Granzow PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR: John Collier The Mayor called the meeting to order. Ih~OCATtON: Reverend Donald F. Carter, of Grace Brethren Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Krein led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCIA~TIONS: The following Proclamations were issued by Mayor Pebley: Columbus Commemoration Week, October 8 to 14, 1967. City and County Government Week, October 8 to 14, 1967. MINUTES: Hinutes of the Anaheim City Council Meeting of September 12, 1967 were approved on motion of Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Krein moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CI~Pf: Demands against the City in the amount of $633,496.03, in accordance with our 1967-68 Budget, were approved. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS NOS. 93 and 94 (General Plan Amendment No. 63): Public Hearings were continued to this date at the request of interested parties, for further consideration of proposed amendments to the Anaheim General Plan, Circulation Elements - Highway Rights-of-Way, es- tablishing the general alignment of Convention Way and Clementine Street, and designating said streets as secondary highways, and further establishing Convention Way between West Street and Harbor Boulevard as a major highway with exceptions. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council. Mr. Norman H. Smedegaard, 811 North Broadway, Santa Ana, Attorney representing Satellite Mobile Home Estates, at the southeast corner of Katella and Haster Street, addressed the City Council objecting to the alignment of Convention Way as projected on General Plan Amendment No. 93, extending across a portion of the Mobile Home property. He was of the opinion that the pro- jected alignment would result in a substantial loss to the owners, and that the extension of Convention Way to Anaheim Stadium would result in serious traffic congestion when events were scheduled at both facilities. Mr. James B. Smith, of Newport Beach, real estate appraiser, address- ed the City Council, estimating that the cost to the City for the land, not including building improvements nor a new overpass for the Freeway, would amount to approximately $280,000.00. This was based on the present day value of the existing Mobile Home property, severance damage to the Park, cost of 10 3 '; 5 C~iiL _Ha!~ei_~m- Ca! rf,p~rni~ -. COUNCIL MINUTES ,~ Septem?er 26 ~196 ? 1; 30 Po__~M~ rehabilitating the Park, etc. It was p,;inted out that the proposal did not include a precise: alignment, and nc land acquisiticn was prc,:posed at the pre:.~ent time~ Mr. Murdocb called attention to the pc;t~::ntial benefits to property owners as a result cf opening up streets cv:nnecting with the c:._,mmerciai re. crea~ tiop areas, which w'¢,sld be cf value in redevel.~ping the agricultural, multiple family re_~:ider~tial sod trailer park pre, petrie3 to their ultimate highest: and be~t use:so The ga?c,r s, sk,~d ii' an.y,c>2~, els~: wished to address th.e City C.~>'~:ncil. Mr: A.J B?mb, Att-srp.~y, addres~-:ed the City C~.~pcSl, acting as Trustee: l>z lz~is M~ R,.~bin, a.r'~d aisc, r¢'pre:~'enting the ¢-:wner ~;f tbs Riviera Mobile Home Trailer Park, [rc, nting c"o I!a~:e:,ila Avenue, between Harbor yard ~nd Haster Str,~et. H6 ¥'~ate~d that the pr',jected alignment ~;f Clemen~- tine Street w~ld diwidt-, the exi::ting traiier p,,rk iDt~; two parcels having frontage n Cl~.~mertineo He exFi~i'ned e?cr~:~w pr-ceedings pending on said pr~;perty:, tko stat~J~ [ f said :.,~persbip bei~g in some d>ubt at the present time, and req,s-?ted that final determipati'~,r~ c,n s~fbject amendment be de ferred .for n2nety' dc~.~, 'being c~f the' (~pini~,n th~.t within that time the ownership w:u!d be determir;ed. F~rtber dJscu:~'..icn was held~, a.,~d Mr. Bomb stated that they were. cpp~sed tc t:b~: ~ligr~mant of the str~,~-t acr~s any part of the trailer park property, a~d th~ gbt the ,',whet shc'~uld hav~ tko right t:. de"~;~al:;p the c~.~rc:~m-~: (ihar_,di'er e×pre:~ed th~'~ c,,pi'~ie, r: that: the tentative timing established f~'r ia. nd a. eq~isit:i.-~r~ of the pr~yp:~sed streets was two ?aarz. ~n the foture~ and he failed ~7., see the h~rm in delaying the de(is-. TiP,~ May~ >r e, sked if' a~v~,ne else wi~bed to, addre~.s the City Cc~'.tncil. Mr, Herbert L, Geisha. nd, 91Vi Wtlsbire B~..;alevard, Beverl~ Hills, Attorney, zepre~e~ti.cg Ll,~,?d B. Dancan~ t.h~~ lessee :f~ De! Ray Trailer Park, 19~9 ?~,~th Manch~t,r A. ven'u~ p~inted ,ut t'bat: the preliminary de.~ign plan ~c.r the pr:>p~ed streets wa~ situated so ~s to> c~t c~ff a substantial p~r~ ti.sp ~,f the trailez park~ as well a~ th~:, ingra, s~ and egress ~or a number ~;f' traiiez sites, p~rt :~f th~; ~t~eet, and p~:0rti..?ns ~,f the recreation area, and he expressed {,ppcs~tiv~n to the alignment as presently depicted. On mc~ic~n by Cc, uncilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler, P,.~blic Hearing on Gener~l Plan Amendment Nos, 95 and 94 w~s continued t47 .Jan'~ary 16~ 1968, 1:30 P.M~ MOTION CARRIED° PUBLIC H~_~RING ~ VARIANCE NO. 1906~ Submitted by James Emmi, requesting per~ missic~ tc c'~;ntinoe ',peratic, n of an industriallk.'=.oriented c. ptical service in the M-1 zone. pr'~.erty l:_,cated .?n the west side of' Raym~;nd Avenue, n~rth c,f Orar~.getherpe Ave, me (183] N,~;rt.h Raymond Avenue). The City Planning (;c~mm. ts~ic, n presented Resolution Nc;. PC67~183, granted said Variance, .~_.~bject tc the f,_'.li~wing conditions~ 1, That the .wner of subj~ct property shall pay to the City of: Anaheim the sum c,f $2.00 per front fo:~t along Raym~,,nd Avenue and Kimberly Avenue for street light purposes. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City cf Anaheim a 15~foct radius corner return for street widening purposes. 3~ That trash storage areas shall be pro¥ided in accordance with approved plans {~n file with the office o[ the Direct~;r of Public Works prior tc final building inspection~ That Cc, nditio~ Nos~ 1 a~d 2, above mentioned, shall be c;~mplied with prior to the t~me that th<e Building Permit is issued, cr wtthin a period c~f. i80 days ~r::m date here::~f, whichever occurs first, c,r such further time at the C~-~issioll :~I City Ccuncil may grant~ 10376 That subject prpperty shall be d~'t'el:~ped :~_h~t.ar~t. tai~? }p e;.::c,rdar~e with pimps and ~p~c;ficati~ms :n [~ls with the (rtv f Anah.~m~ mark~zd Exhibit. i. That :~nly uni:>n members shall bs ser,.ic~-d with glasses by the gran/zng :f this petition, Review cf act i :m take.~. by the Clty Pia~.niag C',mmi$.si-'r~ was rdered by th~. Clt? C; ,uncil, and the City (:ierk w~:?~ r'de:rad set d-~.~e f,,r P,bli. c Hearimg~ properly ~nd the existing ~s~:~. ~,d /' :~ing ir: th~ [mmedi~t~ area, ~:mmarizing the e'.'idan~e ::.~.bm~tt'e:d r.' ~nd ,: .nsid~,rad by '"' Purs:~.~,[ t ~ indicati tn b~, the (::..mcii Member~ the May.,r stated that the Cit'y (L':uncil wa..s in agr-~eme~t with 6'.:.mcilmar, (':oandi~:r"s statement:~ and asked if tb~ Petiti:mer had ~nyth.tng t: add~ add a~ ~'ais time. 10377 C_ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967, 1:30 P.M. Parcel No. 2 - north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Addington Drive, excluding those parcels on both sides of Beauty Street, Starfire Street and Starling Way; Parcel No. 5 - fronts on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of the west portion of Crescent Drive, further known as Peralta Hills Annexation No. 2. Pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-202, the City Planning Commission recommended approval of said Reclassification subject to the following con- dition: 1. That a final tract map of subject property be approved by the City Coun- cil and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Inasmuch as the foregoing applications both encompassed properties included in the Peralta Hills Annexation No. 2, it was determined that both Public Hearings be held concurrently by the City Council. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject properties, and pointed out the various parcels proposed for reclassification to City zoning. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council; there was no response. In answer to Council questioning, Mr. Thompson pointed out that if approved, property owner wishing to develop property included in Reclas- sification No. 67-68-13 would be able to obtain R-1 zoning by filing a tract map. It was noted that four persons appeared at the Public Hearing be- fore the Planning Commission, representing fifteen property owners, request- ing clarification of the proposed zoning, and apparently had no objections thereto. There being no one who wished to address the City Council, the Mayor declared the Hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-538: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 67R-538 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-12 - R-l, R-A and R-E). Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-538 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-539: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 67R-539 for adop- tion, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended, subject to the condition recommended by the City Planning Commis- sion. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-13 R-l) Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-539 duly passed and adopted. 10378 ~ity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-15 and VARIANCE NO. 1907 (Tentative Tract No. 6452): Submitted by Emma Mo Pellew, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-1 and permission to establish a 39-1ot R-1 Subdivision, with waivers of minimum required front yard setback and minimum lot width; pro- perty located at the southeast corner of South and Sunkist Streets. The Plamning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-193 recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following condition: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-194 the Planning Commission granted said Variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 67-68-15. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1; provided, however, that a maximum of 25% of the lots, exclusive of the cul-de-sac lots, be developed with a 20-foot setback, as stipulated by the petitioner. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the zoning and uses in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. Mayor Pebley asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the Hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-540: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-540 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing of zone as requested, subject to recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (67-68-15 - R-l) Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-540 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-541: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-541 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1907, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1907. Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-541 duly passed and adopted. 10379 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26, 1967~ 1:30 P.M. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 6452: Developer - De Ruff Construction Company; tract located at the southeast corner of Sunkist and South Streets, and contains 39 proposed R-1 zoned lots (Reclassification No. 67-68-15 - Variance No. 1907) The City Planning Commission, at their meeting held August 28, 1967, approved said Tentative Map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6452 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 67-68-15 and Variance No. 1907. 3. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the westerly and northerly property lines separa- ting Lot Nos. 1, and 26 through 39 and Sunkist and South Streets, except that corner lot Nos. 1 and 39 shall be stepped down to a height of thirty (30) inches in the front yard setback, and except that pedestrian openings shall be provided in said walls where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highway right-of-way line of an arterial highway. Reasonable landscaping, includ- ing irrigation facilities, shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superin- tendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume all responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 4. That the vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley open- ings, to Sunkist and South Streets shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 5. That Bethel Drive shall be developed with a 40-foot roadway within the 60-foot right-of-way. 6. That only 25% of the lots requiring a 25-foot front setback may be de- veloped with a 20-foot setback. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, Tentative Map, Tract No. 6452 was approved, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-16 and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 960: Submitted by Voge, Inc., requesting an amendment to deed restrictions which limit the use of subject property to business and professional offices, to permit a restaurant, with on-sale beer and wine, with waiver of required 6-foot masonry wall; C-1 zoned property located at the southwest corner of South Street and State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Xo. PC67-1qS, recommended that the City Council execute a written consent to the amendmeut to deed restrictions, heretofore imposed, to include a restaurant in confor- mance with plans submitted with petition for Reclassification No. 67-68-16, subject to the following conditions: 1. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent residential homes, prior to final building and zoning inspections. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along State College Boulevard and South Street, for tree planting purposes, prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. 3. That the completion of these Reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 960. 4. That a 6-foot decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along the west property line and along the north property line at the rear of a 6-foot landscaped area. 5. That the vehicular access rights to South Street shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspection. 10380 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4; provided, however, that the structure shall be reoriented to State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-196, granted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to the following conditions: 1o That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 67-68-16. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That parking areas shall be lighted with down-lighting a maximum 6 feet in height, and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area. 4. That the vehicular access rights to South Street shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 5. That a 6-foot decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along the west property line and along the north property line, to the rear of the required planting strip. 6. That Condition Nos. 2,3,4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. l, 2, 3, and 4; provided, however, that the structure shall be reoriented to State College Boulevard. Mr. Thompson noted the location of subject property and the uses and zoning in the immediate area, calling attention to existing Church and proposed Day School, adjacent on the west. He briefed excerpts from the City Planning Commission Meeting held September 25, 1967, concerning Commission review of revised plans for subject property, at which time said revised plans were approved, provided that no access were granted to South Street; that the petitioner comply with all conditions of Resolution No. PC67-196, in which access rights to South Street were to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim; that a masonry wall be constructed along the north and west property lines; and that a landscaped strip be provided adjacent to said masonry wall at the north. Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that to restrict access to South Street would tend to congest traffic, since motorists using South Street would have to enter State College Boulevard for ingress or egress to and from the property. Revised plans were reviewed by the City Council and the Mayor asked if the petitioners or the representative wished to address the City Council. Mr. Robert Orr, 336 North Central, Glendale, addressed the City Council, representing the property owner and the proposed tenant, advising that the architect had prepared revised plans, without realizing that there should be no access to South Street. He thereupon submitted for Council review an alternate plan, limiting access to State College Boule- vard only, and stated that it was the preference of the developer that access to South Street be allowed for better traffic flow. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council in favor of subject applications. Mr. Milton Fradelis, General Manager, Amigos Restaurants, Inc., briefly explained their restaurant concept, and displayed a colored render- ing of the building, submitting for the record a copy thereof. He was of the opinion that there was a definite need for this type of operation in the area, and noted that the people representing the Church establishment to the west, had expressed no opposition at the Hearing before the Planning Commission. 10381 City Ha]l~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. In response to Council questioning, Mr. Fradelis pointed out that the original plans oriented the building to State College Boulevard, near the corner of the property; however, revised plans show the building located at the opposite side, removed from South Street. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition. Mr. Robert K. Matheson, 1915 East South Street, addressed the Council, representing residents at 1903, 1909, and 1919 East South Street, expressing strong opposition to subject applications and to any restaurant facility on subject property. Specifically, he referred to the noise, bright lights, and traffic which would be generated by the use, in conflict to the residential atmosphere. Mr. Matheson was of the opinion that an application for on-sale beer and wine would be denied by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, due to the close proximity of the Church. He noted previous applications for development of subject property, and advised that residents of the area are not opposed to the development of the property, but are in hopes a more intelligent transition from the residential neighborhood to the "hard core" commercial area will be developed. He felt that circumstances had not changed sufficiently to warrant the proposed development. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council in opposition. Mrs. Ann Madison, representing Calvary Baptist Church, adjacent to subject property, stated that they were not taking a stand for or against the proposed restaurant, and advised the Church has purchased other property for future development, however, the Christian Day School was operated by another group. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to speak, there being no response, asked if the applicant wished an opportunity for rebuttal. Mr. Fradelis requested approval of subject application. Mayor Pebley declared the Hearing closed. RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton offered Resolutions approving both the Reclassi- fication and the Conditional Use Permit, subject to the conditions recom- mended by the City Planning Commission, deleting conditions number 5 and 4,respectively, therefrom, and omitting the reference to required 6-foot masonry wall on the north property line. Discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Schutte stated he would not vote to approve on-sale of alcoholic beverages next to a Church facility or a school. Roll Call vote: AY E S: CO UNC I LME N: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler Krein, Schutte and Pebley None Mayor Pebley declared the foregoing Resolution failed to carry. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-542: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-542 for adoption, disapproving Reclassification No. 67-68-16. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING THAT A C[{ANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED (67-68-16) 10382 City Hall~ Anaheim~ Califor~a - COUNCIL MINUTES Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. Krein, Schutte and Pebley Dutton and Chandler None The Mayor declared Resolution No.67R-542 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-543: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-543 for adoption, denying Conditional Use Permit No. 960. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PER~Y NO. 960. Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Krein, Schutte and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-543 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a ten minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:00 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pebley called the meeting to order, all members of the City Council being present. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-17~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 962~ VARIANCE NO. 1911 (Tentative Tract No. 6459): Submitted by Earl Dahlman and Clarke Wingert requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, and also request- ing permission to establish a 204-unit apartment complex, with waivers of minimum distance between buildings, maximum dwelling unit distance from a standard street and carport location on Portion No. 1; and requesting permis- sion to establish a 16-lot R-3 subdivision with waivers of minimum side yard setback and required masonry wall on Portion No. 2. Property briefly des- cribed as located at the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-198, recommended denial of subject Reclassification, and denied Conditional Use Permit No. 962, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-199, and Variance No. 1911, pursuant to Resolution No. PC67-200. The City Planning Commission also denied Tentative Map Tract No. 6459. Mr. Ronald Thompson, Zoning Supervisor, noted the location of subject property and existing uses in the immediate area. In referring to the area map, Portion 1, Mr. Thompson reported that the 204-unit planned residential development complex would be served by a road running easterly between Portions 1 and 2, and that Portion 2 would be developed as a standard, single story, R-3 subdivision. In summarizing the Hearing held before the City Planning Commission, Mr. Thompson reported on the findings of the Commission upon which their action of denial was based. In answer to Council questioning as to the ownership of the approxi- mate 20-acre agricultural parcel north of subject property, Mr. Thompson re- ported that it was in the ownership of Mr. Clarke Wingert. Discussion was held relative to the elevation of the proposed Orange Freeway, and Mr. Maddox reported that the Freeway proper would be approximately two feet to four feet above present land level; the overcrossing of Lincoln Avenue over the Freeway would be approximately twenty-one feet above elevation, and the off-ramp adjacent to subject property would be at variable elevation. 10383 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. The Mayor invited the applicant to address this Council. Mr. Henry Fredricks, 524 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton, California, proposed developer of subject property, advised that the pro- perty was presently in escrow. He referred to present holdings in the City and their concern for the general welfare of the area itself. He noted the present demand for apartments and advised that they have been building at the rate of one thousand units per year. In his opinion, the demand for apartments will grow even stronger and as a basis for this opinion Mr. Fredricks noted the slow movement in the sale of houses in the $25,000.00 bracket. Mr. Fredricks stated that apartments of the quality they intend to build would be comparable to, and would enhance the value of the homes in the area, and that this will be the situation in Anaheim in the future, as the barrack type - apartments were a thing of the past. Mr. Fredricks noted the reasons for selecting subject site; one being the design of the apartment complex would produce a good living environ- ment, where houses backing up to the Freeway would not. Further, an apartment complex would permit development of the property to its highest and best use. Secondly, was the advertising exposure afforded by the Freeway. He stated that the site was ideally suited for apartments and very poor for an R-1 sub- division, and that financing would be doubtful for an R-1 development. In conclusion, Mr. Fredricks advised that the orientation of the project was designed for future single-family residences to the north of subject property, as a natural transition and to the interest of the property owners in the area and the City. Mro Clarke Wingert, 125 South Rio Vista Street, with the aid of an area map posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers, noted the property owned by his family. He stated that as long as possible his family had not wanted to develop any of the ranches, however, the present economic conditions were more than the ranches could bear, and a program of development must be commenced. He called attention to the problems of development caused by the proposed Orange Freeway, and advised that Sunkist Street is projected to be a major four-lane connector street. Reference was made to the "Front-on Study" presently before the City and the problems created subsequent to the adoption of the General Plan. Mr. Wingert further advised that he had requested R-3 zoning because the lenders were not interested in an R-1 development of this property. Mr. Wingert reported on a canvass of the area in an effort to enlist support for their request, and stated that most of the people contacted wanted no development at all; this he, would also like, but the increase in taxes and other costs now makes this impossible. He further reported that with the power the sale of subject property would give, he hoped to hold the balance of the property to the north until there was a demand for a good R-1 development; that a good, high quality R-3, in his opinion, will protect the balance of his property and that of others. Reference was made to the traffic pattern lending ideally to the R-3 development of subject property. Mr. Wingert reported on a conversation with an appraiser from a local savings and loan association, and advised that it was the appraiser's opinion that an R-3 development would not be an infringement whatsoever on property values in the area, and that he did not know what other development could be made to the property, that might not start an injury to the R-1. In conclusion, Mr. Wingert submitted and read a petition not opposing their request, containing approximately sixty signatures. He stated that they 10384 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. would like to remain orange growers, but the houses came in around them, and eventual progress will make this area a solid, urban area. Further, it was true if the property could be held ten or fifteen years, it would be of greater value as a commercial use, but he, and his family, could not afford to wait that long. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to addcess the Counczl in opposition. Mr. Mike Pettite, 1]0 Normandy Court, requested a show of hands, both for and against subject apartments. (Those against exceeded those in favor.) Nr. Pettite requested to see the petition favoring the apartment complex. Mr. Wingert indicated on area map those properties adjoining his pro- perty that had signed his petition. Mr. Pettite stated that apartments were highly desirous in the proper area, but not in an area primarily established as low density residential. In his opinion, if the zoning of subject property was changed it could establish a precedent for all undeveloped land in the area, thereby saturating the area with apartments, and ultimately downgrading the residential area. Mr. Martin Wilson, 2232 E. Sycamore Street, representing the Sunkist Home Owners' Association, advised that they have been on record for several years, improving and maintaining the integrity of the residential attractiveness of the area under discussion. He further advised that the building of rental properties in the area could entirely change the character of the residential community, and on behalf of the Association, requested that the request for reclassification be denied. Mrs. Jean Garber, 303 North Sunkist Street, advised of the improve- ments made to her home and others, and also of traffic conditions at the present time in the area. Mrs. Garber requested that the traffic situation not be aggravated by increasing the number of cars. In conclusion, Mrs. Garber advised that she was not against apart- ments and realized the necessity, however, not in the East Anaheim neighbor- hood. Councilman Schutte stated that he would like to make further inves- tigations, before making a decision. Councilman Krein asked why the area would be suitable for R-3, if it was not suitable for R-1. Mrs. Garber called attention to the fact that many of the apartment house owners are absentee owners. Further, that she owna an apartment building in Anaheim, and finds that the tenants are extremely transient. Mr. Bob Shay, 204 Royal Place, stated that apartment tenants were transitory and had not the interest in the community. In his opinion, the basic problem was one of economics, and he failed to see why they, as home owners, should suffer with the problems that will arise should an apartment complex be developed in the area. Further, their greatest concern is that there was no guarantee that other areas would not be reclassified to the R-3 zoning. Dr. Howard Garber, 303 North Sunkist Street, filed a letter of oppo- sition with Mayor Pebley, dated September 24, 1967, and during his presentation enlarged on the points noted in said letter. Dr. Garber also recapped points of opposition expressed by previous speakers. It being determined that all and sufficient evidence had been pre- sented, Mayor Pebley declared the Hearing closed. 10385 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. Councilman Chandler moved that the Council decision on Reclassification No. 67-68-17, Conditional Use Permit No. 962, Variance No. 1911, and Tentative Tract No. 6459, be deferred to October 10, 1967, 1:30 P.M. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Application submitted by Jerry E. Huff, for permit to estab- list a three-piece band to supply music for Go-Go dancers (no topless) at the Golden Key, 2625 West Lincoln Avenue, was approved in accordance with the recom- mendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. FRONT-ON STUDY: THE STUDY ENTITLED "A STUDY OF THE PROBLEM OF RESIDENTIAL HOMES FRONTING ON ARTERIAL STREETS" was continued from the meeting of August 22, 1967, and on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, further con- tinued to November 7, 1967. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6451: Recommendations of the City Planning Commission, relative to Tentative Tract No. 6451, (J.W. Mc Michael Company, developers), located east of Euclid Street and west of Arden Street, containing 19 proposed R-2, 5,000 zoned lots, was continued to be considered in conjunction with the Public Hearing on Reclassification No. 67-68-20, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 957: Submitted by First Church of the Nazarene, requesting future expansion of an existing Church on Portion No. 1, and permission for a Sunday School and Pre-school Kindergarten in existing residential structures; R-1 zoned property, located east of East Street, between Lincoln Avenue and Oak Street, was approved in part by the City Planning Commission. Councilman Schutte withdrew request for review of action taken by the City Planning Commission, made September 19, 1967. Said withdrawal was approved by the City Council, and action taken by the City Planning Commission on subject Conditional Use Permit No. 957 sustained. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 952: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Council- man Krein, Irrevocable Offer of Dedication filed by Harry and La Vene Basse, in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 952 was approved as to form, and recordation authorized. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-544: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 67R-544 for adoption: Refer to Resolution nook. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING 'ft~T PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFEI~' LIGttTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF NINTH STREET AND ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 518-A; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION TIIEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC., AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUC'flON THEREOF. Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte and Pebley NOES: COUNCILMEN: None TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Chandler ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-544 duly passed and adopted. SEWER EASEMENT: Mr. Geisler reported on negotiations for sewer easement (Right- of-Way - 448-43), in connection with the Santa Ana Sewer Project, east of Imperial Avenue: Joseph Blanchard, et al, owners, Rinker-Frome, lessees. In accordance with the recommendations of the City Attorney, and on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, payment of $3,849.67 for acquisition of subject easement was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. 10386 City tIal[~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. DEEDS OF EASEMENTS: Councilman Schutte offered Resolutions Nos. 67R-545 through and inc]nding 67R-551 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-545: A RESOI,UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TItE CITY OF ANA- HEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT (;P~ANT DEEI) FROM JOSEPH BLANCILARD, LOIS K. BLANCIIARD, FREDERICK K. GLEASON, JO ANN G. TOMLINSON, AND CI[ARLOTTE M. RICKENBACHER, AND RINKER-FROME JOINT VENTURE, LESSEE, FOR SEWER AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING TIlE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE TO MAKE PAYMENT FOR TIlE SAME. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-546: A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY {',OUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAtlEIN ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEI'ING TO TI{E CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERLY FOR EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, INCLUDING A SANITARY SEMER, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION. (Financial Federation, Inc.) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-547: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVbXlNG TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERiT FOR EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND ELECTRICAL OVERHANG PURPOSES. (~Joseph K. Borges, Jr.) RESOLU£ION NO. 67R-548: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAtIEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEq~tNG TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPER'Il~ FOR EASEMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL OVERHANG AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Vincenzina A. [{utchison.) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-549: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONV~ING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND ELECTRICAL OVERHANG PURPOSES. (Covington Brothers Construction Company.) RESOLU['tON NO. 67R-550: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAtlEIM ACCEPTING AN EASE~EENT DEED CONVEh'ING TO THE CI~Ih' OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL POWER LINES, POLES, ETC., AND FOR ELECTRICAL POWER LINE OVERiLANG PURPOSES. (Covington Brothers Construction Company. ) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-551: A RESOLUTION OF T!IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A DEED FROM SOUTtIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY QUITCLAIMING TO TtIE CITY ALL RIGHTS ACQUIRED UNDER CERTAIN GRANTS OF EASEMENT HEREINAFTER DESCR!BED. (Southern California Edison Company.) Roll Call vote: AYES: (]0'~ N~; [ LI~iEN: NOES: COUNCI I~IEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. None None Mayor Pebley declared Resolutions Nos.67R-545 through and including 67R-55] duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-552: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 67R-552 for adop- tion. Refer to Reso]ution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTItORIZING AND DIRECTING TIlE EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED TO ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT. (Small drain,southerly from Orangethorpe Avenue to Santa Ana River.) Roll Call vote: AYES: COUN(iI LHEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: CO UNCI IDIEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley. None None Mayor Pebiey declared Resolution No. 67R-552 duly passed and adopted. 10387 City tlall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. SALE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY - RIFLE RANGE: Mr. Murdoch referred to offer received from l{obbs Trucking Company to purchase 3.658 acres of City owned property, at the rate of $27,500.00 per acre, and submitted a map indicating values of property recently sold in the area. Said map was reviewed by the City Council. At the conclusion of the discussion that followed, and on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, a counter-offer, based on $32,500.00 per acre, on condition said offer be accepted within thirty days was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. PURCI~SE OF PROPERTY: Mr. Murdoch reported on negotiations held for the purchase of property adjacent to the Valley Street Maintenance Yard, for parking pur- poses, from the Lear-Siegler Company. At the conclusion of the discussion held, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney was authorized to prepare necessary documents for the purchase of the above referred to property, at the cost of $36,194.40. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE FIRE HOSE: Mr. Murdoch reported on the following informal quotations received for the purchase of 1,500 feet of 1-1/2 inch, and 2,600 feet of 2-1/2 inch Double Jacket, Treated Fire Hose, and recommended the acceptance of the Iow bid. American Rubber Co., Los Angeles - - - Wardlaw Fire Equipment, La Habra - - - Albra Fire Equipment, Los Angeles - - - W.B.Equipment, Los Angeles ..... Western Fire Equipment, Orange - - - - - $4,422.6O 4,500.83 - - 4,751.25 -NO BID - -NO BID On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, purchase was authorized from the American Rubber Company, in the amount of $4,422.60, as recommended. MOTION CARRIED. PURChaSE - TILT-BED TRAILER: Mr. Murdoch reported on the following informal quo- tation received for the purchase of one 15-Ton Tilt-Bed Trailer, and recom- mended the acceptance of said bid. Callahan Engineering Co., South Gate - - Hawkeye Trailer, Santa Ana ....... T & H Equipment, Placentia ....... American Trailer & Mfg., Downey .... Utility Trailer Sales, Los Angeles .... - $4,788.00 NO QUOTE -NO QUOTE NO QUOTE -NO QUOTE On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, purchase of said trailer was authorized from Callahan Engineering Company, of South Gate, in the amount of $4,788.00, as the lowest and best bid meet- ing City specifications. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE - RADIO PAGE SYSTEM: Mr. Murdoch reported on bid received, being the the only bid that meets City specifications, for the purchase of a mobile page system, and reco~nended that the bid of E.F.Johnson Company, of Los Angeles, in the amount of $2,831.12, be accepted. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte, purchase of the above Mobile Page System was authorized, as recommended. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims against the City were submitted, denied, and ordered referred to the Insurance Carrier, on motion by Council- man Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein: ao William J. Graham, in the approximate amount of $300.00, for purported water damage on or about August 22, 1967, as a result of turning on water services at 615 South Clementine Street, at a time when the house was unoccupied. 10388 City ~{al], Anaheim~ California - COI~CIL MINUTES - September 267 19677 1:30 P.M. bo Robert Lo Johnson, in the amount of $40.00, for purported injury to hand while deflecting a foul ball on or about July 21, 1967, at the Anaheim Stadium. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton. a. Public Utilities Commission - Application No. 49201 - Santa Barbara Transit Company b. Public Utilities Commission - Application No. 49019 Douglas Bus Lines c. Minutes - AnaheSm Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of August 10, 1967 d. Financial and Operating Reports for the Month of August, 1967. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES FOR FINAL READING: ORDINANCE NO. 2423: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2423 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Reclassification No. 66-67-47 - C-I) Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILbIEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None Mayor Pebley declared Ordinance No. 2423 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2424: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2424 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Reclassification No. 67-68-8 - C-l) Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley None None Mayor Pebley declared Ordinance No. 2424 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCES FOR FIRST READING: ORDINANCE NO. 2425: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2425 for first read- ing. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Reclassification No.65-66-24 (4) - M-l) ORDINANCE NO. 2426: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 2426 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF T~E CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TH ERE~ CttAPTER 14.52 AND SECTION 14.52.010 RELATING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND TURNING MOVEMENTS. 10389 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE APPLICATIONS: The following applications before the Alcoholic Control Board were submitted to the City Council for their information, with no protest action taken: A. Alexander D. and Anita M. Zinda, for Person-to-Person Transfer, Off- Sale General, Zinda's Liquor Mart #2. B. Andrew B. Wright, Person-to-Person Transfer, On-Sale Beer and Wine, Country Girl, 226 North Manchester Avenue. CONVENTION CENTER DEDICATION - EXPENSES: Audit of expenses incurred for the Dedication Ceremony for the Convention Facility, previously submitted to the City Council, was reviewed and discussed. It was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Chandler, that payment of all unpaid bills be authorized and that outstanding bills, if any, be processed administratively; the remaining funds of the Dedication Committee to be turned over to the City, with final accounting made at a later date. MOTION CARRIED. CONVENTION CENTER - DEDICATION CEREMONY TOMMY WALKER~ PRODUCER: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler, request by Tommy Walker for certain adjustments in charges made in connection with the Dedication Ceremony, was submitted and approved in accordance with memo- randum from the City Attorney, dated September 28, 1967. Also approved was payment of $2,500.00 representing advertising costs directly related to the Dedication Ceremony. MOTION CARRIED. CONVENTION CENTER - ART DISPLAYS: On the recommendation of Mr. John Collier, Parks and Recreation Director, and on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the Park and Recreation Commission was requested to study and recommend a policy to be considered by the City Council, in approximately ninety days, on the display of art works at the Convention Center and possibly other public buildings, such as the Anaheim Stadium. MOTION CARRIED. CONVENTION FACILI2~Y 44th ANNUAL HALLOWEEN FESTIVAL - ANAHEIM CtLAAIBER OF COMMERCE: Request for endorsement and City participation of a "Teen Dance" (Arena), and "Adult Costume Ball" Festival program, was submitted. Since this is the only annual festival, and a community event, on recommendation of the City Manager, it was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler, that the proposed contract by the Chamber of Commerce for use of the Convention Facility include the rental amounts according to the fee schedule ($1,000.00 and $1,250.00), and the City pay to the Chamber of Commerce these specific amounts for community participa- tion in the Halloween Festival. MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALKS - WEST STREET AND WESTMONT DRIVE: Report of City Engineer, relative to installation of sidewalks on West Street and Westmont Drive, was con- tinued to the next meeting for further investigation. ROOM OCCUPANCY TAX: Recommendations of the Visitor and Convention Bureau to consider an additional 1% Room Occupancy Tax, was deferred to the next meeting for further investigation. PIGEON CONTROL CONTRACT - ANIMAL SPECIALTY AND CONTROL COMPANY: Mr. Murdoch reported on proposal received from the Animal Specialty and Control Company, to eliminate pigeons in the City of Anaheim. At the conclusion of the discussion, and on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney was requested to prepare necessary agreement with Animal Specialty and Control Company for for a period of six months, at the fee of $150.00 per month. MOTION CARRIED. i0390 City ltall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 26~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. REQUEST - PARKING AREA: Mr. Murdoch reported on verbal request of Mr. Wendell Payne, to clear and pave the property purchased by the City of Anaheim at 114 North Clementine Street (presently leased to tt.F. Peak), to provide an additional lighted parking lot to serve the theatre occupying one of his buildings. No action was taken by the City Council on the above request. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-553: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 67R-553 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE WITH REFERENCE TO LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE ON CERTAIN EMBANKMENT SLOPES. (Sunkist, La Palma, Jefferson and Batavia). Roll Call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Pebley None Krein and Schutte The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-553 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn, Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 5:50 P.M. City [lerk ~a_~j~ll Anaheim~ Calif~rnia =. COUNCIL MINUTES .~ October 3~ 1967~ 1~30 P.M. The City Council ©f the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Krein, Schutte, Chandler and Pebley ABSENT~ COU'NClLMEN~ N~ne iPRESENT~ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER~ Robert Da'vis CITY ATTORNEY; Joseph Geisler CITY CLERK~ Done M. Williams ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIREGTOR~ Robert Mickelson ZONING SUPERVISOR; Ronald Thompson PLANNING SUPERVISOR; Ronald Grudzinski CITY ENGINEER; James P. Madd~x May'~,r Pebley called the meeting te order. FLAG SALUTE; C~>uncilman Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance te the Flag. PROCLAMATIONS~ The following Proclamatimns were issued by Mayor Pebley: "Anaheim Art Association Month" ~ October, 1967. "Halloween Days in History and Literature" ~ October 27 and 28, 1967. MINUTES~ Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meeting of September 19, 1967, were apprcved cn motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED~