2004-183RESOLUTION NO.2004-183
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU~NCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE
BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED
(RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2004-00130)
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted
Resolution No. 2004-95 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 in conjunction with
the approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00029, Reclassification No. 2004-00117,
Amendment No. 5 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SPN 2004-00023L Amendment
No. 2 to the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SPN 2004-00024), and other related actions;
and adopted Resolution No. 2004-94 certifying Final EIR No. 330, adopting a Statement of Findings
and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring
Programs (Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update,
the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle, and
the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085a for the Anaheim Resort
Expansion Area) associated with the project ("Final EIR No. 330"); and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419 provided for a
comprehensive citywide General Plan Update which included redesignating land uses within an
approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim
City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern
Cai ifomia Edison Company right-of-way on the north (referred to as "The Platinum Triangle") from
Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed Use, Office High,
Office Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional, generally corresponding to the property subject
to the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan, except lbr approximately 15 acres a4jacent to
the east side of the Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway, north of Katella Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan envisions The Platinum Triangle as
a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing,
employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit
systems and pedestrian promenades (as set forth in Goal 15.1 of the Land Use Element}; and
WHEREAS, the recently adopted General Plan includes policies in the Land Use
Element and the Community Design Element to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle
including providing for more detailed planning efforts to guide the future development of The
Platinum Triangle; encouraging mixed-use projects integrating retail, office and higher density
residential land uses; encouraging a regional inter-modal transportation hub in proximity to Angel
Stadium of Anaheim: maximizing and capitalizing upon the view corridor from the Santa Aha (I-5)
and Orange (SR-571 Freeways; maximizing views and recreation and development opportunities
afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Aha River: developing a comprehensive Mixed-Use
Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines to implement the vision for The Platinum Triangle; providing
for a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is integrated into the area through carefully
maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and arterial access; developing a Public Realm
Landscape and Identity Program to enhance the visibility and sense of arrival into The Platinum
Triangle through peripheral view corridors, gateways, and specialized landscaping; developing a
strong pedestrian orientation throughout the area, including wide sidewalks, pedestrian paths,
gathering places, ground-floor retail, and street-level landscaping; encouraging extensive office
development along the highly visible periphe~ of the area to provide a quality employment center;
developing criteria for comprehensive property management agreements for multiple-family
residential projects to ensure proper maintenance as the area develops; and, identifying and pursuing
opportunities for open space areas that serve the recreational needs of Platinum Triangle residents
and employees;
WHEREAS, the adopted General Plan establishes a maximum development intensity
for The Platinum Triangle for up to 9,175 dwelling units {at an intensity of up to 100 dwelling units
per acre/, 5.000,000 square feet of office space, slightly over 2,000,000 square feet of commercial
uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.50 and institutional development
at a maximum floor area ratio of 3.0~ and
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission approved a
motion to initiate the following applications and proceedings: Zoning Code Amendment No.
2004-00032 to replace the (SE) (Sports Entertainment) Overlay Zone with the (PTMU) (Platinum
Triangle Mixed Use) Overlay Zone; Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00082, 2004-00083, 2004-00084
and 2004-00085 to replace the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan with The Platinum
Triangle Master Land Use Plan lincluding rescinding Resolution No. 99R-39, which approved the
Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan) and to adopt a standard Development Agreement to
apply to development within the PTMU Overlay Zone; and, Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127,
2004-00128, 2004-00129 and 2004-00130 to reclassify properties within The Platinum Triangle to
the (PTMU) (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and the O-H (High Intensity Office) and
O- L ( Low Intensity Office i Zones to reflect General Plan designations (the "Proposed Actions" ); and
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission's July 12, 2004 motion did
include initiation ora petition for Reclassification No. 2004-00130 for certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
AREA A:
PARCEL A OF THAT CERTAIN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT
NO. 123. AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 1 AND 2 OF SAID LOT
LINE ADJUSTMENT. RECORDED JANUARY 7, 1985 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 85-004456. OFFICIAL RECORDS, ORANGE
COL%'TY. CALIFORNIA.
AREA B:
PARCEL 1: LOT4 AND THE EAST 46 FEET OF LOT 5 OF THE
TRAVIS TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
5, PAGE 120 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING FROM SAID LOT 4 THAT PORTION, LYING
EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE 40 FOOT COUNTY
ROAD SECOND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM B.R.
DOUGLASS AND OTHERS TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE,
RECORDED OCTOBER 7, 1926 IN BOOK 682, PAGE 109 OF
DEEDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED
1N THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION BY THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS
RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1964 IN BOOK 7285, PAGE 833 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION AS
DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION BY
THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF
WHICH WAS RECORDED AUGUST 30, 1965 IN BOOK 7648,
PAGE 943 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED IN
THAT CERTAIN AMENDED FINAL ORDER OF
CONDEMNAT1ON~ SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 178586[Y], A
CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED APRIL 5, 1972
IN BOOK 10069, PAGE 290 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL 2: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF
LOT Y OF THE VAN DE GRAAF TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 440 OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID
POINT BEING 1443.6 FEET EAST OF THE POINT WHERE THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT Y PRODUCED WEST,
INTERSECTS THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE RANCHO
SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA; THENCE NORTH 1012.35 FEET
TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY: THENCE NORTHEASTERLY
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY 455.9
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11904.25 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE
OF LOT Y; THENCE WEST 44'7.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF THAT
CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JUNE
20, 1928 IN BOOK 169, PAGE 417 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,
WHICH SAID POINT OF BEGINNING IS DISTANT SOUTH,
MEASURED ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE 81 FEET FROM
THE CENTER OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD AND
RUNNING THENCE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH
ALONG SAID EAST LINE 25 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT
ANGLES EAST 20 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTH
25 FEET: THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES WEST 20 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION AS
DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION BY
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH
WAS RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1964 IN BOOK 7285, PAGE
833 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED IN
THAT CERTAIN AMENDED FINAL ORDER OF
CONDEMNATION, SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 178586, A
CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED APRIL 5, 1972
IN BOOK 10069, PAGE 290 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS.
AREA C:
PARCELS I THROUGH 9, INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAP NO.
97-187, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP ON FILE IN
BOOK 304, PAGES 31 TO 36 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the proposed Reclassification No. 2004-00130 would reclassi~,'
Areas A. B. and C. as follows:
Area A. From the I (SE) (Industrial - Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone to the I
(PTMU) (Industrial - Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay) Zone on an approximately 3.7-acre
rectangularly shaped property having a frontage of approximately 287 feet on the west side of State
College Boulevard and a depth of 556 feet, being located 335 feet north of the centerline of
Orangewood Avenue, and further described as 2045 South State College Boulevard;
Area B. From the I (SE) (Industrial - Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone to the
(Low Intensity Office) Zone on an approximately 8.7-acre triangularly shaped parcel located at the
southwest comer of Cerritos Avenue and Douglass Road and adjoining the State Route 57/Orange
Freeway on the west, having a frontage of 1,474 feet on the west side of Douglass Road and a
maximum depth of 513 feet, and further described as 1501-1551 South Douglass Road;
Area C. From the O-L (SE) (Low Intensity Office - Sports Entertainment Overlay)
Zone to the O-L (Low Intensity Ofrice ) Zone on an approximately 24.5-acre irregularly shaped parcel
having a frontage of 1.120 feet on the east side of Douglass Road and a maximum depth of I 130
feet, and being located 1 ,{)81 feet north of the centerline of Katella Avenue.
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold
and conduct a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 18.60 (Procedures) and 18.76 (Zoning
Amendments) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and did give all persons interested therein an
opportunity to be heard, and did receive evidence and reports, and did consider the same; and
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. PC2004-86 finding and recommending that the City Council (a) as lead agency for
the Proposed Actions, find that the previously-certified Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and
Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with
CEQA and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required
environmental documentation for the proposed project actions based upon the findings set forth in
said Resolution and (b) recommending that the City Council approve the subject Petition for
Reclassification, unconditionally, to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim
Municipal Code to (1) exclude Area A from the I ISE) (Industrial - Sports Entertainment Overlay)
Zone and to incorporate said property into the 1 (PTMU) (Industrial - Platinum Triangle Mixed Use
Overlay) Zone: (2) exclude Area B from the 1 (SE) (Industrial - Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone
and to incorporate said property into the O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zone: and, (3) exclude Area C
from the O~L (SE) (Low Intensity Ofrice - Sports Entertainment Overlay) Zone and to incorporate
said property into the O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zone based upon the following facts:
1. That the Land Use Element of the ,Anaheim General Plan designates the property in
Area A lbr Mixed-Use, and the properlies in Areas B and C tbr Office-Low.
2. That no development shall occur on the above-described properties that exceeds the
maximum amounts analyzed by Environmental Impact Report No. 330, and further described below:
(a)
Area A is within the Gateway District of The Platinum Triangle as indicated
on Figure 5 of The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. The maximum
allowable development for this district shall be no greater than five hundred
thirty thousand (530,000) square feet of office uses; fifty thousand (50,000)
square feet of commercial uses; and one thousand seven hundred fifty (1,750)
dwelling units.
(b)
Areas B and C are designated Office Low by the General Plan. The
maximum allowable office development within The Platinum Triangle in that
portion of The Platinum Triangle designated Office-Low and/or Office-High
by the General Plan shall be no greater than one million seven hundred thirty
five thousand (1,735,000) square feet.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties is necessary and/or desirable
for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties does properly relate to the
zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to the subject properties and to
the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community.
WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004, the City Council did hold and conduct a duly
noticed public hearing, and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard, and did
receive evidence and reports, and did consider the same, including the Staff Report to the City
Council dated August 11, 2004, and the recommendations and findings of the Anaheim City
Planning Commission as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2004-86; and;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
("CEQA"), on August l 7, 2004, the Anaheim City Council, as lead agency for the Proposed Actions,
based upon the Initial Study prepared in connection with the Proposed Actions (Zoning Code
Amendment No. 2004-00032, Miscellaneous Case Nos. 2004-00083, 2004-00084 and 2004-00085
and Reclassification Nos. 2004-00127, 2004-00128, 2004-00 129 and 2004-00130) did consider
whether the Proposed Actions may cause any additional significant effect on the environment which
was not previously examined in FEIR No. 330, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Programs,
unless additional or contrary intbrmation is received during the public hearing, by motion, did find
and determined, based upon said Initial Study and the evidence received at the public hearing, that
no additional significant effect will result Iron] the proposal; no new mitigation measures or
alternatives are required: that the Proposed Actions are within the Scope of FEIR No. 330: that the
previously-certified Final EIR No. 330 and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring
Program No. 106 for The Platinum Triangle are in compliance with CEQA and the State and City
CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the
Proposed Actions, including the subject proposal, and satisfy' all of the requirements of CEQA: and,
that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the Proposed Actions. Moreover,
future individual development projects and infrastructure improvements which are proposed to
implement The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the PTMU Overlay Zone and the O-H and
O-L Zones, will require further environmental review and analysis of potential site specific
environmental impacts in conjunction with the processing of discretionary applications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after due consideration of the recommendations and
findings of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, and all evidence, testimony and reports offered
at said hearing, does hereby' determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed reclassification would reclassify the above-described properties,
unconditionally, as follows:
(a)
To exclude ,Area A from the I (SE) (Industrial - Sports Entertainment
Overlay) zone and to incorporate said property into the I (PTMU) (Industrial
- Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay') zone:
(b)
To exclude Area B from the I (SE) (Industrial - Sports Entertainment
Overlay) Zone and to incorporate said property into the O-L (Low Intensity'
Office) Zone: and,
(c)
To exclude Area C from the O-L(SE) (Low' Intensity Office - Sports
Entertainment Overlay) Zone and to incorporate said property into the O-L
(Low Intensity' Office) Zone.
2. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties is necessary and/or desirable
for the orderly and proper development of the community.
3. That the proposed reclassification ofsubj ect property does properly relate to the zones
and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to the subject properties and to the
zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification is compatible with surrounding zoning designations
and will implement the land use designations set forth tbr the properties in the City of Anaheim
General Plan: and that approval will establish consistent land use and site development standards
for the area: and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find and determine that the Zoning Map refen'ed
to in Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal ('ode should be amended and that the properties hereinafter
described should be excluded from the zone in which they' are now situated and incorporated in the
zones as hereinafter set forth.
NOW', THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Anaheim that the City Council does hereby declare and indicate its intention to amend the Zoning
Map of the City of Anaheim and to rezone and reclassify the following described properties, situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, to-wit:
AREA A:
PARCEL A OF THAT CERTAIN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT
NO. 123, AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL I AND 2 OF SAID LOT
LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED JANUARY 7, 1985 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 85-004456, OFFICIAL RECORDS, ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
into the "1 (PTMU) (Industrial - Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay)" Zone of the City of
Anaheim; and
AREA B:
PARCEL 1: LOT 4 AND THE EAST 46 FEET OF LOT 5 OF THE
TRAVIS TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
5, PAGE 120 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA~
EXCEPTING FROM SAID LOT 4 THAT PORTION, LYING
EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE 40 FOOT COUNTY
ROAD SECOND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM B.R.
DOUGLASS AND OTHERS TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE,
RECORDED OCTOBER 7, 1926 IN BOOK 682, PAGE 109 OF
DEEDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED
IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION BY THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS
RECORDED NOVEMBER 2. 1964 IN BOOK 7285, PAGE 833 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION AS
DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION BY
THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF
WHICH WAS RECORDED AUGUST 30, 1965 IN BOOK 7648,
PAGE 943 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED IN
THAT CERTAIN AMENDED FINAL ORDER OF
CONDEMNATION, SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 178586[Y], A
CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED APRIL 5, 1972
IN BOOK 10069, PAGE 290 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL 2: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF
LOT Y OF THE VAN DE GRAAF TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 440 OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SAID
POINT BEING 1443.6 FEET EAST OF THE POINT WHERE THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT Y PRODUCED WEST,
INTERSECTS THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE RANCHO
SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA; THENCE NORTH 1012.35 FEET
TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAYi THENCE NORTHEASTERLY
ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF' SAID RIGHT OF WAY 455.9
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11904.25 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE
OF LOT Y: THENCE WEST 447.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF THAT
CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JUNE
20, 1928 IN BOOK 169, PAGE 417 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS~
WHICH SAID POINT OF BEGINNING IS DISTANT SOUTH,
MEASURED ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE 81 FEET FROM
THE CENTER OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD AND
RUNNING THENCE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH
ALONG SAID EAST LINE 25 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT
ANGLES EAST 20 FEET: THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTH
25 FEET: THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES WEST 20 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION AS
DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION BY
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH
WAS RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1964 IN BOOK 7285, PAGE
~33 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE LAND DESCRIBED IN
THAT CERTAIN AMENDED FINAL ORDER OF
CONDEMNATION. SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. 178586~ A
CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECORDED APRIL 5, 1972
IN BOOK 10069, PAGE 290 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS.
into the "O-L (Low Intensity Office)" Zone of the City of Anaheim; and
AREA C:
PARCELS 1 THROUGH 9. INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAP NO.
97-187, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP ON FILE IN
BOOK 304, PAGES 31 TO 36 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
into the O-L (Low Intensity Office) Zones of the City of Anaheim.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning
oL or a commitment by the City to rezone, the subject properties; any such rezoning shall require an
ordinance of the City Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by
the City Council at its sole discretion as set forth in Section 18.76.070 (Effect of City Council's
Failure to Adopt Rezoning Ordinance) of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Anaheim does
hereby find and determine that this Resolution is conditioned upon and will take effect upon the
effective date of Ordinance 5935 establishing the PTMU Overlay Zone.
10
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of
the City of'Anaheim this 17th day of August. 2004. by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Pringle,
NOES: none
ABSENT: none
ABSTAIN: Council
Council Members
Member Tait
Chavez, Hernandez, McCracken
CITY OF~ ~
By__
MAYOR OF THE CI ANAHEIM
55264.2 mgordon'Augus! 12, 2004
11