Resolution-PC 2000-5~
RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-5
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 99-00-11 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Gity Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for
Reclassification for real properry situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION
7, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES,
CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PER
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7 DISTANT
N. 0° 35' S0" W., 18.30 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE FROM THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AS SAID
NORTHEAST CORNER IS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 35, PAGE 20
OF RECORD OF SURVEYS; 7HENCE S. 71° 01' 05" W., 74.16 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING
A RADIUS OF 2000.00 FEET; 7HENCE WESTERLY 211.48 FEET ALONG
SAID CURVE THROUGH A C~NTRAL ANGEL OF 6° 03' 30"; THENCE
TANGENT TO SAID CURVE S. 77° 04' 35" W,.323.24 FEET TO AN
INTERSECTION WITH A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 590.00 FEET
WESTERLY FROM THE EASTi LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SAID
INTERSECTION BEING S. 0° ~5' 50" E., 131.04 FEET ALONG SAID
PARALLEL LINE FROM THE wORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;
THENCE S. 0° 35' 50" E., 25.59 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO ITS
POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND
SOUTHERLY 25.00 FEET FROM THAT CERTAIN COURSE HEREINBEFORE
CITED AS HAVING A BEARING OF S. 77° 04' 35" W. AND A LENGTH OF
323.24 FEET; THENCE N. 77°~04' 35" E., 104.45 FEETALONG SAID
PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE TBiAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 164.00 FEET
SOUTHERLY FROM THAT CERTAIN COURSE IN THE CENTERLINE OF
CRESCENT AVENUE SHOWw AS HAVING A BEARING OF S. 88° 34' 54" W.
AND A LENGTH OF 2641.70 F~EET ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY, SAID
POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING N.
77° 04' 35" E., 161.56 FEET AL.ONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE EAST
LINE OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE S. 0° 36' 03" E., 233.98 FEET ALONG
SAID EAST LINE TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 365.40 FEET
SOUTHERLY FROM SAID CERTAIN COURSE IN THE CENTERLINE OF
CRESCENT AVENUE; THENCE S. 88° 42' 10" W., 59.85 FEET ALONG SAID
PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 200.00 FEET
EASTERLY FROM THE LINE HEREINBEFORE CITED AS BEING PARALLEL
WITH AND 590.00 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE N. 0° 35' 50" W., 201.42 FEET ALONG
SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 164.00
FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID CENTERLINE OF CRESCENT AVENUE;
THENCE S. 88 42' 10" W., 98.02 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CR3857PK.DOC -1- PC2000-5
~ ~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim on January 3, 2000 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate
and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from the RS-A-43,000
(Residential/Agricultural) zone to the CL (Commercial, Limited) zone.
2. That the subject prope~ty is currently vacant and zoned RS-A-43,000; and that the
Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element designates this property for Golf Course and General Open
Space land uses and designates the adjacent property to the east for General Commercial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassifcation of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for
the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones
and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and
their permitted uses generally established throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification is to construct a commercial parking lot, which is an
appropriate use for this landlocked parcel which only has access from the adjacent commercial parcel to
the east; and that there are no potentially adverse impacts associated with the proposed development of
this property that might adversely impact adjacent properties or the surrounding community.
6. That the Planning Commis5ion recommended the petitioner make an effort to retain
existing trees and landscaping in connection with development of this property.
7. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal;
and that no correspondence was received in opposition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the RS-A-43,000
"Residential/Agricultural" zone to the CL "Commercial, Limited" zone (to construct a commercial parking
lot that would serve an existing commercial office building to the east) on a irregularly-shaped 1.18-acre
landlocked property located south and west of the southwest corner of Crescent Avenue and Brookhurst
Street and adjacent to the eastern property line of the Dad Miller Golf Course, and further described as
511 North Brookhurst Street; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the
declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative
Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on
the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'p' RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby approve the subject Petition for Rectassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning
Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to exclude the above-described property from the RS-A-43,000
(Residential/Agricultural) Zone and to incorporate said described property into the CL (Commercial,
Limited) Zone upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the
City of Anaheim:
CR3857PK.DOC -2- PC2000-5
• ~
That a lot line adjustment plat to combine this lot with the adjacent property to the east shall be
submitted to the Subdivision Section, Development Services Division, for review and approval by
the City Engineer. The approved lot line adjustment plat shall then be recorded in the Office of the
Orange County Recorder.
2. That prior to the placement of an ordinance rezoning subject property on an agenda for City Council
consideration, Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The City Council may
approve or disapprove a zoning ordinance at its discretion. If the ordinance is disapproved, the
procedure set forth in Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.03.085 shall apply. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the Planning Commission
unless said conditions are complied with within one (1) year from the date of this resolution, or such
further time as the Planning CommisSion may grant.
3. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that
it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicanYs compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof,
be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a
commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of
the City Council which shall be a legislative act which may be approved or denied by the City Council at
its sole discretion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
January 3, 2000.
.~~ ~ G;~~~~~
CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CI Y PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/~
SECRE ARY, A HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
CR3857PK.DOC -3- PC2000-5
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on January 3, 2000, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNOLD, BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, KOOS, NAPOLES, VANDERBILT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this c/~ day of
~~I~~,~,~U}-+ _ - ~ 2000.
~!b'tiU
SECRETARY, A HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
CR3857PK.DOC -4- PC2000-5