Resolution-PC 2001-174•
RESOLUTION NO. PC2001-174
u
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REINSTATING AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2876
AND AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. PC87-17,
AS AMENDED, ADOPTED THEREWITH
WHEREAS, on January 19, 1987, the Anaheim City Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. PC87-17 to grant Conditional Use Permit No. 2876 (permitting continuation of an outdoor
recreational vehicle storage yard with a caretaker's residence at 4420 East La Palma Avenue) for five
years; and that said use was originally established in connection with Orange County Use Permit No.
3895 prior to annexation to the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, on February 4, 1992, the Anaheim City Council adopted Resolution No.
PC92R-23 to amend the conditions of approval and permit the use for an additional 10 years until
December 1, 2001; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, the City Council adopted the Northeast Area
Specific Plan No. 94-1 for a large area including subject property; and that subject property is now
located in Development Area 2(Expanded Industrial Area) of the SP 94-1 zone; and
WHEREAS, this property is developed with a recreational vehicle storage yard with a
caretaker's unit; that the property is zoned SP 94-1, DA 2(SC) (Northeast Area Specific Plan, Expanded
Industriaf Area = Scenic Cc~rridorOverlay); that the property is-located i~ the A4pha No~tkteas~ -
Redevelopment Project Area; and that the Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element designates the
property for General Industrial land uses; and
WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested reinstatement of this conditional use permit,
which expired on December 1, 2001, to retain the outdoor recreational vehicle storage yard with
caretaker's residence under authority of Code Sections 18.03.093 and 18.110.070.050 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Pianning Commission did hofd a public hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim on December 17, 2001, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code,
Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed amendment and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the use, as proposed to be reinstated, is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by the Zoning Code in Development Area 2(Expanded Industrial Area) of the
Northeast Area Specific Plan.
2. That the proposal will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and
development of the area in which it is located; that the use has operated in substantially the same
manner as approved by the City Council; and that Code Enforcement Division staff has inspected the
premises and determined that the recreational vehicle storage facility with caretaker's unit is in
compliance with all applicable conditions of approval.
CR5264PK.doc -1- PC2001-174
• •
3. That the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequate to allow full
development of the proposal in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare.
4. That the traffic generated by the use, as proposed to be reinstated, will not impose an
undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
5. That this conditional permit is being exercised in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area and surrounding land uses, as evidenced by the absence complaints to Code Enforcement
Division.
6. That reinstating this conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will not be
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal;
and that no correspondence was received in opposition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City
Planning Director's authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the
definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 1(Existing Facilities), as defined in the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to
prepare additional environmental documentation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
daes herebyamenct Resolatiort No. PC~7-17, as amended, adop~ed in connection witk~ Eondi~ional Use
Permit No. 2876, to reinstate and retain the outdoor recreational vehicle storage yard with a caretaker's
residence and without a time limitation; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does amend the conditions
of approval, in their entirety, to read as follows and which conditions are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
Proposed Condition No. 1 was deleted at the December 97, 2001 Planning Commission hearing.
2. That no barbed wire shall be visible to the public right-of-way.
3. That the on-site landscaping and irrigation system shall be refurbished and maintained in
compliance with City standards.
4. That no on-site maintenance of vehicles, including cleaning and detailing, or storage of vehicle
lubricants or vehicle parts, shall be permitted.
That a valid business license shall be maintained with the Business License Division of the City of
Anaheim Finance Department.
6. That flags, banners, pennants, balloons and other outdoor displays shall not be permitted in
conjunction with the business authorized by this conditional use permit.
7. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of
regular landscaping maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty
four (24) hours from time of occurrence.
-2- PC2001-174
~
•
8. That signage for subject facility shall be limited to that shown on the exhibits submitted by the
petitioner and approved by the Planning Commission. Any additional signage shall be subject to
approval by the Planning Commission as a"Reports and Recommendations" item.
9. That within a period of three (3) months from the date of this resolution, Condition Nos. 2 and 3,
aforementioned, shall be complied with. An extension for further time to complete said conditions
may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
10. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that
it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and
Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval
of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
December 17, 2001.
~ % ii~?3 _7~//~
CHAIRPERSON PRO TEMPORE,
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ . ~.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Fernandes, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on December 17, 2001, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, EASTMAN, KOOS, VANDERBILT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ARNOLD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this l s i day of
e~n c~^, 2001.
~ ~-~,.~°~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Tracking No. CUP2001-04474
-3- PC2001-174