Loading...
Resolution-PC 2003-127~J RESOLUTION NO. PC2003-127 • A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REINSTATING AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4045, AND AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. PC98-120, ADOPTED THEREWITH WHEREAS, on August 3, 1998, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did, by its Resolution No. PC98-120, grant Conditional Use Permit No. 4045 to permit an outdoor portable food service use (hot dog cart) in conjunction with a permitted retail store (Home Depot) at 800 North Brookhurst Street; and that said resolution includes the following condition of approval: 1. That this use permit shall expire five (5) years from the date of this resolution, on August 3, 2003. WHEREAS, the property is developed with a 130,707 square foot retail home improvement store; that the underlying zoning is CL(BCC) (Commercial, Limited - Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Overlay); that the Anaheim General Plan land use designation is General Commercial; and that the property is located in the West Anaheim Commercial Corridors Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested reinstatement of this conditional use permit to retain the outdoor portable food service use (hot dog cart) in conjunction with a permitted retail store pursuant to Code Section 18.03.093 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on September 8, 2003, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed amendment and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the use, as proposed to be amended, is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Code. 2. That this conditional use permit is being exercised in a manner not detrimental to the particular area and surrounding land uses, as evidenced by the absence of Code Enforcement complaints; and that the use, as proposed to be amended, will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is located. 3. That the size and shape of the site for the use, as proposed to be amended, is adequate to allow full development of the use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare. 4. That the traffic generated by the use, as proposed to be amended, will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 5. That granting this reinstatement, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 6. That this conditional use permit is being exercised in a manner not detrimental to the pa~ticular area and surrounding land uses, nor to the public peace, health, safety and general welfare; that it has operated in substantially the same manner as originally approved by the Planning Commission; Tracking No. CUP2003-04749 cr\PC2003-127.doc -1- PC2003-127 ~ ~ and that Code Enforcement staff has inspected the premises and determined that the facility is in compliance with all applicable conditions of approval. 7. That deletion of the time limitation is necessary to permit reasonable operation of the use under the conditional use permit as originally granted. 8. That there have been no changes to the applicable zoning standards that would invalidate the findings that were the basis for the original approval of this conditional use permit. 9. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that no correspondence was received in opposition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: The Planning Director's authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 11, as defined in the State of California Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby reinstate and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 4045 to retain an outdoor portable food service use (hot dog cart) in conjunction with a permitted retail store without a time limitation; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Condition No. 1 pertaining to the 5-year time limitation is hereby deleted; and that the conditions of approval in Resolution No. PC98-120, adopted in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 4045, are hereby amended, in their entirety, to read as follows: 1. That only one (1) hot dog cart shall be permitted; and that no accessory equipment, displays or freestanding accessories shall be permitted in conjunction with this approval. 2. That no signs advertising this food service, other than signs affixed to the cart, shall be permitted. 3. That the subject property shall be developed and maintained substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1, and as conditioned herein. 4. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of September 8, 2003. ~ ERSON,~EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATT SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) -2- PC2003-127 ~ ~ I, Pat Chandler, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September 8, 2003, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VACANCY: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHE , 2003. BOSTWICK, EASTMAN, FLORES, ROMERO, VANDERBILT NONE O'CONNELL ONE SEAT REOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ day of R SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3- PC2003-127