Resolution-PC 2003-69~ ~i
RESOLUTION NO. PC2003-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2003-00096 BE GRANTED UNCONDITIONALLY
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did initiate Reclassification of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST %z OF THE NORTHWEST %z OF
THE NORTHWEST %Z OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11
WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, AS SAID SECTION IS SHOWN ON
A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11, MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS IN THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED IN THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 4, 1951 IN BOOK 2180 AT PAGE
241 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim on May 5, 2003 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of aIL evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is from the CH (Commercial,
Heavy) and CL (Commercial, Limited) zones to the CL (Commercial, Limited) or a less intense zone.
2. That the property is developed with a commercial center inctuding a fast food restaurant;
that the Anaheim General Plan designates the property for General Commercial land uses; and that the
property is located within the West Anaheim Commercial Corridors Redevelopment Project Area.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for
the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones
and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and
their permitted uses generally established throughout the communiry.
5. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal;
and that no correspondence was received in opposition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify a rectangularly-shaped 2.4-acre property
located at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Beach Boulevard and having frontages of 378 feet on
the south side of Ball Road and 277 feet on the east side of Beach Boulevard, and further described as
2954-2978 West Ball Road and 1218 South Beach Boulevard from the CH (Commercial, Heavy) and CL
(Commercial, Limited) zones to the CL (Commercial, Limited) or a less intense zone; and does hereby
approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of
the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments
received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on
the environment.
cr\PC2003-069.doc -1- PC2003-69
• ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning
Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to exclude the above-described property from the CH (Commercial,
Heary) and CL (Commercial, Limited) Zones and to incorporate said described property into the CL
(Commercial, Limited) Zone unconditionally.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a
commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of
the City Council, which shall be a legislative act which may be approved or denied by the City Council at
its sole discretion.
May 5, 2003.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
CHAIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
IOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on May 5, 2003, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, KOOS, ROMERO, VANDERBILT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EASTMAN
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~3 ~' day of
, 2003.
~
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PC2003-69