Resolution-PC 2004-123~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC2004-123
A RESOWTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF
RESOLUTION NO. PC98-189 ADOPTED IN CONNECTION WITH
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4074
:(2411-2461 WEST CA PALMAAVENUE AND 1212NORTH HUBBELL WAY) -
WHEREAS,:on November 23, 1998, the Anaheim Planning Commission did, by Resolution
No. PC98-189, grantConditional Use Permit No. 4074#o permit 21,289 square foot adult career/training
center for up to 200 students with waiver of minimum number'of parking spaces.
WHEREAS, Resolution Na PC98-189, adopted in connection with subject usepermit,
includes the following condition of approval pertaining to a time limitation:
WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested to amend said condition of approval
"2. That this conditional use permit shall expire seven (7) years from the date of this
resolution, on November 23, 2005; to coincide with expiration of the current lease."
WHEREAS, this property is currently developed with two (2) mixed use industrial/office
complexes with a total of eight (8) buildings having a cumulative floor. area of approximately 543,000 square
feet, the underlying zoning is I(Industrial); the Anaheim General Plan designates this propertyfor lndustrial
Jand uses; and this property is located within the West Anaheim Commercial Corridors Redevelopment
Project Area; and is: situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
, PARCELA: PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 141, PAGES 26 AND 27 OF PARCEL
MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL B: PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 26, PAGE 49 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL C: PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 26, PAGE 49 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on October 18, 2004, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to
hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed amendment and to investigate and make fiindings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and
in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the
Zoning Code.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and
development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to health and safety;
CR\PC2004-123 '-1- PC2004-123
: ~ •
4. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; '
5. That the granting of the conditional use permitUnder the conditions imposed, if any, will not be
detrimental fo the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the #acts necessary to support each and every finding for the original approval of the
entitlemenf exists,
7. That the permit is being exercised in a manner not detrimental to the particular area and
surrounding land uses, nor to the public health and safety and;
8. That with regard only to any deletion of a timeJimitation, such deletion is appropriate because '
it has been demonstrated that the use has operated in a manner that is appropriate in the underlying zone
and the surrounding area and that the periodic review of the use is no longer necessary and/or it can be
determined that, due to changed circumstances, the use is consistent with the City's long-term plans for the
area.
9. °< Thaf no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no'
correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to delete a condition of approval pertaining to a timelimitation to
retain an adult/career training center and does herebyfind that the Negative Declaration previously approved
in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 4074 is adequate to serve as the required environmental
documentation in connection with this request upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent
judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any
comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and
any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project wili have a significant effect on
the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby
amend, in its entirety, the conditions contained in Resolution No. PC98-189 to read as follows:
1. That the maximum number of students shall be limited to one hundred seventy-five (175) students on-
site at any given time.
2. That there shall be no housing of students on these premises.
3. That the career center shall limit instruction to vocational health services and computer training.
4. That signage on the subject property shall be limited to that which is shown on Exhibit No. 4, as
submitted by the petitioner and approved by the Planning Commission. Any additional signs shall be :
subject to reviewing approval by the Planning Services Division. Any decision by staff may be
appealed to the Planning Commission as a"Reports and Recommendations° item.
5. That prior to this business commencing operation, a valid business license shall be obtained from the
City Business License Division.
6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, and as conditioned herein.
7. That prior to the commencement of the activity authorized by this resolution, Condition No. 5,
above-mentioned, shall be complied with. ~
8. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City; State and Federal
-2- PC2004-123
' ~' ~
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement:
AND BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges
related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the finai invoice
or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges
shall result in delays in the issuance of required permifs or the revocation of the approvai of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the' Planning Commission meeting of
October 18, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter,18.60"Procedures"
of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal proc dure may be aced by a City Council
Resolution in the event of an appeaL ' _
~
HAIRMAN, AHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: '
~~C~-- i~~~-'° '
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION _
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on October 18, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUFFA, EASTMAN, FLORES, O'CONNELL, ROMERO, VANDERBILT-LINARES,
VELASQUEZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ,G n d day of -
A1 , 2004.
/r~2'.~c.o
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION