Resolution-PC 2004-98~ •
RESOLUTION NO: PC2004-98
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITYPCANNING COMMISSION
REINSTATING AND ARPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3511, AND
AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NOS. PC92-45,
PC94-134 ANDPC99-179; ADOPTED THEREWITH '
(1531 SOUTH SfNCLAIR STREET)
WHEREAS, on April 6, 1992,'the Planning Commission adopted Resolution Na PC92-
45 to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 3511 and permit a church with waiver of minimum number of parking
spaces for five years on property located at 1531 South Sinclair Street; and on'October 3, 1994,'the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No: PC94-134 to amend Condition Na 1 of said Resolution No: PC92-45 and
permit the use until October 1, 1999; and on October 11,'1999, the Commission adopted Resolution No. PC99-
179 to amend Condition No. 1 of said Resolution No. PC99-179 and permit the use until October 11, 2004; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. PC99-179 includes the following condition of approvaL•
. "1. That subject use permit shall expire five (5)years from the date of this resolution
(on October 11, 2004):'
W HEREAS, the petitioner has requested reinstatement of this conditional use permit under
authority of Section 18.60.180 of the Anaheim Municipal Code to retain the church; and
WHEREAS, this property is developed with an industrial building with tenant improvements for
this church facility (Stadium Vineyard Church) in the I(Industrial) zone; and that the Anaheim General Plan iand
Use Element designates this property for Industrial fand uses; and said property is described as fo{{ows:
PARCEL 13 AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 162, PAGES 27 TO 31 INCLUSIVE OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUN7Y,
CAUFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City
of Anaheim on September 8, 2004, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.66.040.030,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed amendment and to investigate and make findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in
its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts
1. That the church is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Code Section
18.08.030.040;
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and
development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to health and safety;
4. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and
5. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, will not be .
detrimental to'the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
` CR1PC2004=098 -1- PC2004=98
~ ~
6. That the facts necessary to support each and every finding for the original approval of the
entitlement as set forth in this chapter exist; ' '
7. That the permit is being exercised substantially in the same manner and in conformance with all
conditions and stipulations originally approved and as confirmed by inspection of the Code Enforcement Division
of the property and as indicated in a memorandum dated July 29, 2004;
8, That the permit is being exercised in a manner not detrimental to the particular area and
surrounding land uses, nor to the health and safety as the site is being well maintained and no open code
enforcement violations exist on the property; and
9. That with regard to the deletion of a time limitation, such deletion is appropriate because it has
been demonstrated that the use has operated in a manner that is appropriate in the underlying zone and the
surrounding area and that the periodicreview of the use is no longer necessary and it can be determined that,
due to changed circumstances, the use is consistent with the City's long-term plans for the area.
10. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition.
CALIFORNIAENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACTFINDING: 'That the Anaheim City Planning
, Commission has reviewed the proposal to reinstate this permit by the modification or deletion of a condition of
approval pertaining to a time limitation (approved on October 11, 1999 #o expire October 11;' 2004) to retain a
church; and does hereby find that the Negative Declaration previously approved in connection with Conditional
Use Permit No. 3511 is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation in connection with this
request upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has
considered the previously approved Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the
public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there
is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, 7HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby amend Resolution Nos. PC 92-45, PC94-134 AND PC99-179 in their entirety, adopted in connection
with Conditional Use Permit No. 3511, to reinstate this conditional use permit without a time limitation with the
following conditions of approvaL
1. That fire sprinklers and a local fire alarm system shall be maintained as required by the Fire Department.
2. That subject property shall be maintained substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted
to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4.
3. That the petitioner shall obtain a reciprocal parking agreement for additional off-site parking during any hours
when there are large congregations on the subject property. Said parking agreement shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, and the City Attorney. If required by the City
Attorney, said agreement shall be recorded with the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
4. That the hours ofi operation shall be as follow:
Worship services: Sunday \ 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
Office hours: Tuesday through Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.. '
Special meetings: Saturday Befinreen 12:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. or
Sunday -After 6:00 p.m.
5. That approval of this application constitutes approval of theproposed request only#o the extent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federa{
-2- PC2004-98
~ ~
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request
regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each ~
and alf of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared
' invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and
any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
September 8, 2004. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions sef forth in Chapter 18.60 "Procedures"
of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council
Resolution in the event of an appeaL
AIRPERSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION : '
AT T:
~, ~
ENIOR ECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Pat Chandler, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission
held on September 8, 2004, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EASTMAN, FLORES, O'CONNELL, ROMERO, VANDERBILT-LINARES,
VELASQUEZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BUFFA
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~ day o
2004.
ENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC2004-98